Form 6-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
Commission file number 1- 33198
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
4th Floor, Belvedere Building, 69 Pitts Bay Road, Hamilton, HM 08, Bermuda
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover
Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40- F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7).
Yes o No þ
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON FORM 6-K FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 28
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES (note 9d) |
|
|
233,771 |
|
|
|
233,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
25,465 |
|
|
|
34,954 |
|
Vessel operating expenses (note 9d, 10) |
|
|
75,130 |
|
|
|
63,388 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
20,270 |
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
45,570 |
|
|
|
45,008 |
|
General and administrative (note 9b, 9c, 9d, 10) |
|
|
18,730 |
|
|
|
16,634 |
|
Loss on sale of vessel |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of vessel (note 4a, 15) |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge (note 7) |
|
|
3,924 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
190,160 |
|
|
|
185,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
43,611 |
|
|
|
48,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (note 6, 9b, 9c, 9d) |
|
|
(8,469 |
) |
|
|
(9,880 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on non-designated derivative instruments
(note 10) |
|
|
10,840 |
|
|
|
(24,475 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange (loss) gain (note 10) |
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
1,622 |
|
Other income net (note 8) |
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
(30,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax (expense) recovery |
|
|
46,622 |
|
|
|
18,351 |
|
Income tax (expense) recovery (note 11) |
|
|
(2,653 |
) |
|
|
6,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
43,969 |
|
|
|
25,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest in net income |
|
|
20,593 |
|
|
|
10,849 |
|
Dropdown Predecessors interest in net income (note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
General Partners interest in net income |
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Limited partners interest: (note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
21,369 |
|
|
|
13,862 |
|
Net income per common unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
Weighted-average number of common units outstanding (basic and diluted)
(note 13) |
|
|
57,170,219 |
|
|
|
38,206,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions declared per unit |
|
|
0.475 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party transactions (note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 3 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (note 6) |
|
|
123,422 |
|
|
|
166,483 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
77,744 |
|
|
|
64,993 |
|
Net investments in direct financing leases current |
|
|
20,379 |
|
|
|
21,157 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
37,138 |
|
|
|
29,740 |
|
Due from affiliates (note 9e) |
|
|
9,459 |
|
|
|
19,135 |
|
Current portion of derivative instruments (note 10) |
|
|
10,945 |
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
280,368 |
|
|
|
308,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment (note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $1,225,168 (December 31, 2010 $1,200,325) |
|
|
2,218,025 |
|
|
|
2,247,323 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts |
|
|
53,670 |
|
|
|
52,184 |
|
Net investments in direct financing leases |
|
|
45,347 |
|
|
|
50,413 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 10) |
|
|
10,869 |
|
|
|
5,202 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
19,285 |
|
|
|
22,652 |
|
Intangible assets net |
|
|
26,983 |
|
|
|
28,763 |
|
Goodwill shuttle tanker segment |
|
|
127,113 |
|
|
|
127,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,781,660 |
|
|
|
2,842,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
17,231 |
|
|
|
12,749 |
|
Accrued liabilities (note 10) |
|
|
84,260 |
|
|
|
88,538 |
|
Due to affiliates (note 9e) |
|
|
84,501 |
|
|
|
67,390 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 6) |
|
|
137,468 |
|
|
|
152,096 |
|
Current portion of derivative instruments (note 10) |
|
|
46,510 |
|
|
|
45,793 |
|
Due to joint venture partners |
|
|
14,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
384,470 |
|
|
|
366,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 6) |
|
|
1,667,768 |
|
|
|
1,565,044 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 10) |
|
|
97,690 |
|
|
|
119,491 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
19,282 |
|
|
|
19,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,169,721 |
|
|
|
2,072,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 6, 10, 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable non-controlling interest (note 12a) |
|
|
40,614 |
|
|
|
41,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
48,323 |
|
|
|
170,876 |
|
Partners equity |
|
|
520,322 |
|
|
|
556,828 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
571,325 |
|
|
|
728,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and total equity |
|
|
2,781,660 |
|
|
|
2,842,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation of variable interest entities (note 12c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 4 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
43,969 |
|
|
|
25,262 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments (note 10) |
|
|
(30,298 |
) |
|
|
13,370 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
45,570 |
|
|
|
45,008 |
|
Loss on sale and write down of vessels and equipment |
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (recovery) (note 11) |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
(8,686 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange loss and other |
|
|
5,965 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating activities |
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
Expenditures for drydocking |
|
|
(7,169 |
) |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
61,318 |
|
|
|
73,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from drawdown of long-term debt |
|
|
177,644 |
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt (note 6) |
|
|
(44,441 |
) |
|
|
(11,839 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(50,360 |
) |
|
|
(110,163 |
) |
Advances to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,410 |
) |
Joint venture partner advances |
|
|
14,500 |
|
|
|
4,532 |
|
Contribution by Teekay Corporation relating to acquisition of Rio das Ostras (note 9c) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of 49% interest in Teekay Offshore Operating L.P. (note 9a) |
|
|
(160,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity contribution from joint venture partner |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,581 |
|
Expenses of equity offerings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,452 |
) |
Cash distributions paid by the Partnership |
|
|
(27,723 |
) |
|
|
(17,665 |
) |
Cash distributions paid by subsidiaries to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(17,449 |
) |
|
|
(19,472 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
(106,079 |
) |
|
|
(40,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
(9,197 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in direct financing lease assets |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
(886 |
) |
Direct financing lease payments received |
|
|
5,473 |
|
|
|
6,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(43,061 |
) |
|
|
38,480 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
166,483 |
|
|
|
109,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
123,422 |
|
|
|
147,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosure (note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 5 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN TOTAL EQUITY
(in thousands of U.S. dollars and units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
Limited Partner |
|
|
General |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
(Note 10) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
55,238 |
|
|
|
540,355 |
|
|
|
16,473 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
170,876 |
|
|
|
728,449 |
|
|
|
41,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,369 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,593 |
|
|
|
43,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of redeemable non-controlling
interest in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
1,338 |
|
Unrealized net gain on qualifying cash flow hedging
instruments (note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
Realized net gain on qualifying cash flow hedging
instruments (note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,238 |
) |
|
|
(1,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(42,723 |
) |
|
|
(2,449 |
) |
Contribution of capital from joint venture partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution of capital from Teekay Corporation to
Rio das Ostras (note 9c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity offering (note 9a, 13) |
|
|
7,563 |
|
|
|
221,742 |
|
|
|
4,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of 49% of Teekay Offshore Operating L.P.
(note 9a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(254,237 |
) |
|
|
(5,189 |
) |
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
(128,003 |
) |
|
|
(386,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
62,801 |
|
|
|
503,971 |
|
|
|
16,351 |
|
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
48,323 |
|
|
|
571,325 |
|
|
|
40,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 6 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
43,969 |
|
|
|
25,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net gain (loss) on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments (note 10) |
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
(2,355 |
) |
Realized net (gain) loss on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments (note 10) |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
713 |
|
Pension adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
(1,926 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
45,187 |
|
|
|
23,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest in comprehensive income |
|
|
21,038 |
|
|
|
10,115 |
|
Dropdown Predecessors interest in comprehensive income (note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(895 |
) |
Partners interest in comprehensive income |
|
|
24,149 |
|
|
|
14,116 |
|
Page 7 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles (or GAAP). These financial statements
include the accounts of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P., which is a limited partnership organized
under the laws of the Republic of The Marshall Islands, its wholly owned or controlled
subsidiaries and the Dropdown Predecessor, as described in Note 2 below and variable interest
entities (or VIEs) for which Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. or its subsidiaries are the primary
beneficiaries (see Note 12) (collectively, the Partnership). The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Certain information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete annual financial
statements have been omitted and, therefore, these interim financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the Partnerships audited consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2010, which are included in our Annual Report on Form 20-F. In the opinion of
management of our general partner, Teekay Offshore GP L.L.C. (or the General Partner), these
interim unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, of a normal
recurring nature, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the Partnerships
consolidated financial position, results of operations, changes in total equity and cash flows
for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods presented
are not necessarily indicative of those for a full fiscal year. Historically, the utilization of
shuttle tankers in the North Sea is higher in the winter months and lower in the summer months,
as generally there is higher maintenance in the oil fields during the summer months, which leads
to lower oil production, and thus, lower shuttle tanker utilization during that period.
Significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
On April 1, 2010, the Partnership acquired from Teekay Corporation a floating storage and
offtake (or FSO) unit, the Falcon Spirit, together with its charter contract. This transaction
was accounted for as a business acquisition between entities under common control. As a result,
the Partnerships consolidated statements of income, cash flows and comprehensive
income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 have been retroactively adjusted to include the
results of the acquired vessel (referred to herein, together with the results of the Cidade de
Rio das Ostras (or Rio das Ostras), described below, as the Dropdown Predecessor), from the date
that the Partnership and the acquired vessel were both under common control of Teekay
Corporation and had begun operations. The vessel began operations under the ownership of Teekay
Corporation on December 15, 2009. The effect of adjusting the Partnerships financial statements
to account for the common control transfer of the Falcon Spirit increased the Partnerships net
income and comprehensive income by $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
On October 1, 2010, the Partnership acquired from Teekay Corporation a floating production,
storage and offloading (or FPSO) unit, the Rio das Ostras. This transaction was accounted for as
a business acquisition between entities under common control. As a
result, the Partnerships consolidated statements of income, cash flows and comprehensive income for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 have been retroactively adjusted to include the results of the Rio
das Ostras from the date that the Partnership and the acquired vessel were both under common
control of Teekay Corporation and had begun operations. Teekay Corporation had an 82% interest
in the Rio das Ostras when it commenced operations on April 1, 2008. Teekay Corporation
acquired the remaining 18% interest on June 30, 2008. Adjusting the Partnerships financial
statements to account for the common control transfer of the Rio das Ostras decreased the
Partnerships net income and comprehensive income by ($1.4) million and ($1.8) million,
respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
3. |
|
Adoption of New Accounting Policies |
In January 2011, the Partnership adopted an amendment to Financial Accounting Standards Board
(or FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (or ASC) 605, Revenue Recognition, that provides for
a new methodology for establishing the fair value for a deliverable in a multiple-element
arrangement. When a vendor specific objective or third-party evidence for deliverables in a
multiple-element arrangement cannot be determined, the Partnership will be required to develop a
best estimate of the selling price of separate deliverables and to allocate the arrangement
consideration using the relative selling price method. The adoption of this standard did not
have an impact on the Partnerships consolidated financial statements.
Page 8 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
a) |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
For a description on how the Partnership estimates fair value, see Note 2 in the
Partnerships audited consolidated financial statements filed with its Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010. The estimated fair value of the Partnerships
financial instruments and categorization using the fair value hierarchy for these financial
instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Hierarchy |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
|
Level (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
123,422 |
|
|
|
123,422 |
|
|
|
166,483 |
|
|
|
166,483 |
|
Due from affiliates (note 9e) |
|
|
|
|
9,459 |
|
|
|
9,459 |
|
|
|
19,135 |
|
|
|
19,135 |
|
Due to affiliates (note 9e) |
|
|
|
|
(84,501 |
) |
|
|
(84,501 |
) |
|
|
(67,390 |
) |
|
|
(67,390 |
) |
Long-term debt (note 6) |
|
|
|
|
(1,805,236 |
) |
|
|
(1,713,398 |
) |
|
|
(1,717,140 |
) |
|
|
(1,620,355 |
) |
Derivative instruments (note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(154,775 |
) |
|
|
(154,775 |
) |
|
|
(175,784 |
) |
|
|
(175,784 |
) |
Cross currency swap agreement |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
10,503 |
|
|
|
10,503 |
|
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
4,233 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
11,432 |
|
|
|
11,432 |
|
|
|
6,909 |
|
|
|
6,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value hierarchy level is only applicable to each financial instrument on the
consolidated balance sheets that is recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. |
The Partnership has determined that there were no non-financial assets or non-financial
liabilities carried at fair value at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, except for a
1992-built shuttle tanker, which was written down to an estimated fair value of $11.0 million at December
31, 2010 and a 1993-built conventional tanker, which was written down to an estimated fair value of $16.9
million at March 31, 2011. The fair value of the vessels were determined based on directly
observable inputs (level 2).
The Partnership employs a number of vessels on long-term time charters and assembles,
installs, operates and leases equipment that reduces volatile organic compound emissions (or
VOC Equipment) during loading, transportation and storage of oil and oil products. The
long-term time-charters and the leasing of the VOC Equipment are accounted for as direct
financing leases, with lease payments received by the Partnership being allocated between the
net investment in the lease and other income using the effective interest method so as to
produce a constant periodic rate of return over the lease term.
The following table contains a summary of the Partnerships financing receivables by type of
borrower and the method by which the Partnership monitors the credit quality of its financing
receivables on a quarterly basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Indicator |
|
Grade |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Direct financing leases |
|
Payment activity |
|
Performing |
|
|
65,726 |
|
|
|
71,570 |
|
The following tables include results for the Partnerships segments for the periods presented in
these consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
138,232 |
|
|
|
35,763 |
|
|
|
17,491 |
|
|
|
42,285 |
|
|
|
233,771 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
19,028 |
|
|
|
6,146 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,465 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
40,785 |
|
|
|
5,825 |
|
|
|
9,148 |
|
|
|
19,372 |
|
|
|
75,130 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
20,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,270 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
27,432 |
|
|
|
6,045 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
8,912 |
|
|
|
45,570 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
12,482 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
18,730 |
|
Loss on sale of vessel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
Write-down of vessel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
17,008 |
|
|
|
15,098 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
10,565 |
|
|
|
43,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 9 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
141,993 |
|
|
|
31,565 |
|
|
|
20,650 |
|
|
|
39,371 |
|
|
|
233,579 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
29,054 |
|
|
|
5,651 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,954 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
34,163 |
|
|
|
5,714 |
|
|
|
8,405 |
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
63,388 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
25,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24,955 |
|
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
8,894 |
|
|
|
45,008 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
11,260 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
16,634 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
17,404 |
|
|
|
13,265 |
|
|
|
5,569 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
48,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and
administrative expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). |
A reconciliation of total segment assets to total assets presented in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Shuttle tanker segment |
|
|
1,691,459 |
|
|
|
1,711,341 |
|
Conventional tanker segment |
|
|
300,841 |
|
|
|
304,655 |
|
FSO segment |
|
|
112,522 |
|
|
|
119,844 |
|
FPSO segment |
|
|
528,590 |
|
|
|
513,886 |
|
Unallocated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
123,422 |
|
|
|
166,483 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
24,826 |
|
|
|
26,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
|
2,781,660 |
|
|
|
2,842,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Revolving Credit Facilities due through 2018 |
|
|
1,188,243 |
|
|
|
1,066,909 |
|
Norwegian Kroner Bond due in 2013 |
|
|
108,315 |
|
|
|
103,061 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2017 |
|
|
211,423 |
|
|
|
244,958 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2023 |
|
|
297,255 |
|
|
|
302,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,805,236 |
|
|
|
1,717,140 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
137,468 |
|
|
|
152,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion |
|
|
1,667,768 |
|
|
|
1,565,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2011, the Partnership had nine long-term revolving credit facilities, which, as
at such date, provided for borrowings of up to $1,446.60 million, of which $258.5 million was
undrawn. The total amount available under the revolving credit facilities reduces by $163.8
million (remainder of 2011), $187.0 million (2012), $333.5 million (2013), $659.4 million
(2014), $17.5 million (2015) and $85.4 million (thereafter). Six of the revolving credit
facilities are guaranteed by the Partnership and certain of its subsidiaries for all outstanding
amounts and contain covenants that require the Partnership to maintain the greater of a minimum
liquidity (cash, cash equivalents and undrawn committed revolving credit lines with at least six
months to maturity) of at least $75.0 million and 5.0% of the Partnerships total consolidated
debt. The Partnership also has a revolving credit facility of which Teekay Corporation
guarantees $65.0 million of the final repayment. In addition to the Partnership covenants
described above, Teekay Corporation is also required to maintain the greater of a minimum
liquidity (cash, cash equivalents and undrawn committed revolving credit lines with at least six
months to maturity) of at least $50.0 million and 5.0% of Teekay Corporations total
consolidated debt which has recourse to Teekay Corporation. The remaining two revolving credit
facilities are guaranteed by Teekay Corporation and contain covenants that require Teekay
Corporation to maintain the greater of a minimum liquidity (cash and cash equivalents) of at
least $50.0 million and 5.0% of Teekay Corporations total consolidated debt which has recourse
to Teekay Corporation. The revolving credit facilities are collateralized by first-priority
mortgages granted on 35 of the Partnerships vessels, together with other related security.
Page 10 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
On November 30, 2010, the Partnership issued NOK 600 million in senior unsecured bonds that
mature in November 2013 in the Norwegian bond market. The Partnership capitalized issuance costs
of $1.3 million, which is recorded in other non-current assets in the consolidated balance sheet
and is amortized over the term of the senior unsecured bonds. The
bonds have been listed on the Oslo
Stock Exchange. Interest payments on the senior unsecured bonds are based on NIBOR plus a
margin of 4.75%. The Partnership entered into a cross currency swap to swap the interest
payments from NIBOR into LIBOR and principal from Norwegian Kroner to US dollars. (See Note 10).
As at March 31, 2011, five of the Partnerships 50% owned subsidiaries each had an outstanding
term loan, which in the aggregate totaled $211.4 million. The term loans reduce over time with
quarterly and semi-annual payments and have varying maturities through 2017. These term loans
are collateralized by first-priority mortgages on the five vessels to which the loans relate,
together with other related security. As at March 31, 2011, the Partnership had guaranteed $59.7
million of these term loans, which represents its 50% share of the outstanding vessel mortgage
debt of four of these 50% owned subsidiaries. The other owner and Teekay Corporation have
guaranteed $105.7 million and $46.0 million, respectively.
As at March 31, 2011, the Partnership had term loans outstanding for the shuttle tankers the
Amundsen Spirit and the Nansen Spirit, which in the aggregate totaled $184.7 million. For each
of these loans, one tranche reduces in semi-annual payments while the other tranche
correspondingly is drawn up every six months with a final $29.1 million bullet payment per
vessel due 12 years and three months from each vessel delivery date. These term loans are
collateralized by first-priority mortgages on the vessels to which the loans relate, together
with other related security and are guaranteed by Teekay Corporation.
As at March 31, 2011, the Partnership had term loans outstanding for the Rio das Ostras FPSO
unit and the shuttle tanker the Peary Spirit, which in the aggregate totaled $112.6 million and
are guaranteed by Teekay Corporation. The term loans reduce over time with quarterly and
semi-annual payments and have varying maturities through 2023. These term loans are
collateralized by first-priority mortgages on the vessels to which the loans relate, together
with other related security.
Interest payments on the revolving credit facilities and the term loans are based on LIBOR plus
a margin. At March 31, 2011, the margins ranged between 0.30% and 3.25%. The weighted-average
effective interest rate on the Partnerships variable rate long-term debt as at March 31, 2011
was 1.5%. This rate does not include the effect of the Partnerships interest rate swaps (see
Note 10).
The aggregate annual long-term debt principal repayments required to be made subsequent to March
31, 2011 are $122.0 million (remainder of 2011), $201.5 million (2012), $350.3 million (2013),
$799.1 million (2014), $53.7 million (2015), and $278.6 million (thereafter).
As at March 31, 2011, the Partnership and Teekay Corporation were in compliance with all
covenants related to the credit facilities and long-term debt.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Partnership sold the FSO unit, Karratha
Spirit, and the time-charter contract for the Basker Spirit was terminated. The Partnership committed to
plans for termination of the employment of certain seafarers of the two vessels. Under the
plans, the Partnership recorded restructuring charges of approximately $3.9 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2011. At March 31, 2011, restructuring liabilities of $3.8 million
were recorded in accrued liabilities.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Partnership completed the remaining reflagging of
two of its vessels from Norwegian flag to Bahamian flag and changed the nationality mix of its
crews. The Partnership commenced the reflagging of a total of seven vessels in March 2009.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Partnership incurred $0.1 million in
restructuring costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Volatile organic compound emissions plant lease income |
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income net |
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
|
Related Party Transactions and Balances |
|
a) |
|
On March 8, 2011, the Partnership acquired Teekay Corporations 49% interest in Teekay
Offshore Operating L.P. (or OPCO) for a combination of $175 million in cash (less $15
million in distributions made by OPCO to Teekay Corporation between December 31, 2010 and
the date of acquisition) and the issuance of 7.6 million of the Partnerships common units
to Teekay Corporation and a 2% proportionate interest to the General Partner in a private
placement (see Note 13). The acquisition increased the Partnerships ownership of OPCO to
100%. The excess of the proceeds paid by the Partnership over Teekay Corporations
historical book value of $128.0 million for the 49% interest in OPCO was accounted for as
an equity distribution to Teekay Corporation of $258.3 million. |
|
b) |
|
On April 1, 2010, the Partnership acquired Teekay Corporations 100% interest in an FSO
unit, the Falcon Spirit, together with its charter contract, for a purchase price of $44.1
million. The purchase was partially financed through proceeds from a public offering of
common units. The Falcon Spirit is chartered to a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum of
Qatar Ltd., on a fixed-rate time charter contract for 7.5 years (beginning December 2009)
with an option for the charterer to extend the contract for an additional 1.5 years. The
acquisition consisted of the Partnership acquiring Teekay Corporations equity interest in
Teekay Al Raayan LLC for $11.3 million and Teekay Corporations interest in amounts due to
Teekay Corporation from Teekay Al Raayan LLC for $32.8 million. |
Page 11 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, $0.3 million of general and administrative
expenses (consisting primarily of vessel management fees and legal and professional fees) and
$0.4 million of interest expense from credit facilities that were used to finance the
acquisition of the Falcon Spirit were incurred by Teekay Corporation and have been allocated
to the Partnership as part of the results of the Dropdown Predecessor.
|
c) |
|
On October 1, 2010, the Partnership acquired from Teekay Corporation the Rio das Ostras
FPSO unit, which is on a long-term charter to Petroleo Brasileiro SA (or Petrobras), for a
purchase price of $157.7 million, plus working capital of $12.4 million. The purchase
agreement provides that Teekay Corporation shall reimburse the Partnership for upgrade
costs in excess of the upgrade estimate as of the closing date. During the three months
ended March 31, 2011, Teekay Corporation reimbursed the Partnership for $1.0 million of
such upgrade costs, which is reflected as a capital contribution. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the following costs attributable to the operations
of the Rio das Ostras were incurred by Teekay Corporation, and have been allocated to the
Partnership as part of the results of the Dropdown Predecessor:
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses (consisting primarily of salaries, defined
benefit pension plan benefits, and other employee related costs, office rent, legal
and professional fees, and travel and entertainment) of $1.8 million. |
|
|
|
Interest expense from credit facilities that were used to finance the acquisition
of the Rio das Ostras of $0.5 million. |
|
|
|
Loss from changes in the foreign exchange rate on the foreign exchange forward
contracts of ($0.1) million is reflected in other comprehensive income. |
|
d) |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, nine conventional tankers, two shuttle
tankers and two FSO units of the Partnership were employed on long-term charter contracts
with subsidiaries of Teekay Corporation, and two conventional tankers of the Partnership
were employed on long-term charter contracts with a joint venture in which Teekay
Corporation has a 50% interest. Teekay Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries
provide substantially all of the Partnerships commercial, technical, crew training,
strategic and administrative services needs. In addition, the Partnership reimburses the
General Partner for all expenses incurred by the General Partner that are necessary or
appropriate for the conduct of the Partnerships business. Revenues (expenses) from such
related party transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Revenues(1) |
|
|
42,288 |
|
|
|
37,780 |
|
Vessel operating expenses(2) |
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
|
|
(1,066 |
) |
General and administrative(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
(14,688 |
) |
|
|
(12,262 |
) |
Interest expense(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,240 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenue from long-term charter contracts with subsidiaries or affiliates of
Teekay Corporation. |
|
(2) |
|
Crew training fees charged from Teekay Corporation. |
|
(3) |
|
Commercial, technical, strategic and administrative management fees charged
from Teekay Corporation. |
|
(4) |
|
Amounts include $0.1 million in 2011 and $0.2 million in 2010 of reimbursements
of costs incurred by the General Partner. |
|
(5) |
|
Amounts are net of $0.9 million in 2011 and $0.9 million in 2010 of management
fees from ship management services provided by the Partnership to a subsidiary of Teekay
Corporation. |
|
(6) |
|
Interest paid to Teekay Corporation for financing the Partnerships acquisition
of a FPSO unit and interest allocated from Teekay Corporation as a result of the
Dropdown Predecessor. |
|
e) |
|
At March 31, 2011, due from affiliates totaled $9.5 million (December 31, 2010 $19.1
million) and due to affiliates totaled $84.5 million (December 31, 2010 $67.4 million).
Due to and from affiliates are non-interest bearing and unsecured and are expected to be
settled within the next fiscal year in the normal course of operations. |
10. |
|
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
The Partnership uses derivatives to manage certain risks in accordance with its overall risk
management policies.
Foreign Exchange Risk
The Partnership economically hedges portions of its forecasted expenditures denominated in
foreign currencies with foreign currency forward contracts. Certain foreign currency forward
contracts are designated, for accounting purposes, as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign
currency expenditures.
Page 12 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
As at March 31, 2011, the Partnership was committed to the following foreign currency forward
contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
|
Fair Value / Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Foreign |
|
|
Amount of Asset/(Liability) |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Expected Maturity |
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
|
Forward |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
Non-hedge |
|
|
Rate (1) |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
Norwegian Kroner |
|
|
515,000 |
|
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
6,742 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
43,812 |
|
|
|
37,585 |
|
British Pound |
|
|
3,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
Euro |
|
|
14,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
13,058 |
|
|
|
6,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
7,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,777 |
|
|
|
45,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average forward rate represents the contracted amount of foreign currency one U.S. Dollar
will buy. |
The Partnership incurs interest expense on its Norwegian Kroner-denominated bonds. The
Partnership entered into a cross currency swap to economically hedge the foreign exchange risk
on the principal and interest. As at March 31, 2011, the Partnership was committed to one cross
currency swap with the notional amounts of NOK 600 million and $98.5 million, which exchanges a
receipt of floating interest based on NIBOR plus a margin 4.75% with a payment of floating
interest based on LIBOR plus a margin of 5.04%. In addition, the cross currency swap locks in
the transfer of principal to $98.5 million upon maturity in exchange for NOK 600 million. The
fair value of the swap as at March 31, 2011 was $10.5 million.
Interest Rate Risk
The Partnership enters into interest rate swaps, which exchange a receipt of floating interest
for a payment of fixed interest to reduce the Partnerships exposure to interest rate
variability on its outstanding floating-rate debt. The Partnership has not designated, for
accounting purposes, its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of its U.S. Dollar
LIBOR-denominated borrowings.
As at March 31, 2011, the Partnership was committed to the following interest rate swap
agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Index |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
(%)(1) |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
(96,974 |
) |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
730,271 |
|
|
|
(57,801 |
) |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,530,271 |
|
|
|
(154,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the margin the Partnership pays on its variable-rate debt, which as at March
31, 2011, ranged between 0.30% and 3.25%. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Principal amount reduces quarterly or semi-annually. |
Tabular disclosure
The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments,
segregated by type of contract, on the Partnerships balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
portion of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
portion of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
assets |
|
|
assets |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
As at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts cash flow hedges |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts not designated as hedges |
|
|
5,843 |
|
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cross currency swap not designated as hedges |
|
|
2,696 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps not designated as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,694 |
) |
|
|
(46,391 |
) |
|
|
(97,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,945 |
|
|
|
10,869 |
|
|
|
(10,454 |
) |
|
|
(46,510 |
) |
|
|
(97,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts cash flow hedges |
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts not designated as hedges |
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Cross currency swap not designated as hedges |
|
|
2,031 |
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps not designated as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,939 |
) |
|
|
(45,385 |
) |
|
|
(119,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
|
|
5,202 |
|
|
|
(10,740 |
) |
|
|
(45,793 |
) |
|
|
(119,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 13 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
For the periods indicated, the following table presents the effective portion of gains
(losses) on foreign currency forward contracts designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges
that were (1) recognized in other comprehensive income, (2) recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income (or AOCI) during the term of the hedging relationship and reclassified to
earnings, and (3) recognized in the ineffective portion of gains (losses) on derivative
instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
(AOCI) |
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
(AOCI) |
|
|
Statement of Income |
Effective |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Ineffective |
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Ineffective |
|
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
(2,355 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(665 |
) |
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2,355 |
) |
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
(1,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2011, the Partnerships accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of
unrealized gains on foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges. As at
March 31, 2011, the Partnership estimated, based on the current foreign exchange rates, that it
would reclassify approximately $7.1 million of net gains on foreign currency forward contracts
from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings during the next 12 months.
Realized and unrealized (losses) gains of interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward
contracts that are not designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges, are recognized in
earnings and reported in realized and unrealized (losses) gains on non-designated derivatives in
the consolidated statements of income. The effect of the (loss) gain on derivatives not
designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated statements of income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Realized (losses) gains relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(13,702 |
) |
|
|
(12,787 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,284 |
) |
|
|
(12,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
20,765 |
|
|
|
(10,949 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
(584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,124 |
|
|
|
(11,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on non-designated derivative instruments |
|
|
10,840 |
|
|
|
(24,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains of the cross currency swap are recognized in earnings and reported
in foreign exchange (loss) gain in the consolidated statements of income. For the three months
ended March 31, 2011, an unrealized gain of $6.2 million (2010 $nil) and a realized gain of
$0.7 million (2010 $nil) were recognized in earnings.
The Partnership is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counter-parties
to the foreign currency forward contracts and the interest rate swap agreements. In order to
minimize counterparty risk, the Partnership only enters into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A- or better by Standard & Poors or A3 or better by Moodys at
the time of the transactions. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate
swaps are entered into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
Page 14 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
11. |
|
Income Tax (Expense) Recovery |
The components of the provision for income tax (expense) recovery are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Current |
|
|
(1,484 |
) |
|
|
(1,775 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
(1,169 |
) |
|
|
8,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) recovery |
|
|
(2,653 |
) |
|
|
6,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
a) |
|
During 2010, an unrelated party contributed a shuttle tanker with a value of $35.0
million to a subsidiary of OPCO for a 33% equity interest in the subsidiary. The equity
issuance resulted in a dilution loss of $7.4 million. The non-controlling interest owner in
the subsidiary holds a put option which, if exercised, would obligate OPCO to purchase the
non-controlling interest owners 33% share in the entity for cash in accordance with a
defined formula. The redeemable non-controlling interest is subject to remeasurement if the
formulaic redemption amount exceeds the carrying value. |
|
b) |
|
The Partnership may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings and claims
that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Partnership believes that any adverse
outcome, individually or in the aggregate, of any existing claims would not have a material
effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows, when taking into
account its insurance coverage and indemnifications from charterers or Teekay Corporation. |
|
c) |
|
The Partnership consolidates certain VIEs. In general, a VIE is a corporation,
partnership, limited-liability company, trust or any other legal structure used to conduct
activities or hold assets that either (1) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out
its principal activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) has a group
of equity owners that are unable to make significant decisions about its activities, or (3)
has a group of equity owners that do not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right
to receive returns generated by its operations. A party that is a variable interest holder
is required to consolidate a VIE if it has both (a) the power to direct the activities of a
VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (b) the obligation
to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right
to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. |
On October 1, 2010, OPCO agreed to acquire all of Teekay Corporations interests in the Peary
Spirit LLC, which owns the newbuilding shuttle tanker, Peary Spirit. On that date the Peary
Spirit LLC became a VIE and the Partnership became its primary beneficiary. The Partnership
consolidates the Peary Spirit LLC in its consolidated financial statements effective October
1, 2010. The purchase of the Peary Spirit LLC is expected to coincide with the commencement
of the time-charter contract for the Peary Spirit in July 2011.
The following table summarizes the balance sheets of the Peary Spirit LLC as at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts |
|
|
53,680 |
|
|
|
52,195 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
55,166 |
|
|
|
53,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
Advances from affiliates |
|
|
30,241 |
|
|
|
28,760 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
23,843 |
|
|
|
23,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
55,181 |
|
|
|
53,696 |
|
Total deficit |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and total deficit |
|
|
55,166 |
|
|
|
53,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets and liabilities of Peary Spirit LLC are reflected in the Partnerships
consolidated financial statements at historical cost as the Partnership and the VIE are under
common control. The Partnerships maximum exposure to loss as of March 31, 2011, as a result
of its commitment to purchase Teekay Corporations interests in the Peary Spirit LLC, is
limited to the purchase price of its interest in the Peary Spirit, which is expected to be
approximately $133 million. The assets of the Peary Spirit LLC cannot be used by the
Partnership and the creditors of the Peary Spirit LLC have no recourse to the general credit
of the Partnership.
Page 15 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
13. |
|
Partners Equity and Net Income Per Unit |
Private Placement
On March 8, 2011, the Partnership issued 7.6 million common units to Teekay Corporation and a 2%
proportionate interest to the General Partner as part of the consideration for the Partnerships
acquisition of the remaining interests in OPCO (see Note 9a). As a result of the transaction,
Teekay Corporations ownership of the Partnership was increased
from 28.26% to 36.90%, including the 2% General Partner interest.
Net Income Per Unit
Net income per unit is determined by dividing net income, after deducting the amount of net
income attributable to the Dropdown Predecessor, the non-controlling interest and the General
Partners interest, by the weighted-average number of units outstanding during the applicable
period.
The General Partners and common unit holders interests in net income are calculated as if all
net income was distributed according to the terms of the Partnerships partnership agreement,
regardless of whether those earnings would or could be distributed. The partnership agreement
does not provide for the distribution of net income; rather, it provides for the distribution of
available cash, which is a contractually defined term that generally means all cash on hand at
the end of each quarter less the amount of cash reserves established by the Partnerships board
of directors to provide for the proper conduct of the Partnerships business including reserves
for maintenance and replacement capital expenditure and anticipated credit needs. Unlike
available cash, net income is affected by non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization,
unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments and foreign currency translation gains.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, cash distributions exceeded $0.4025 per
unit and, consequently, the assumed distributions of net income resulted in the use of the
increasing percentages to calculate the General Partners interest in net income for the
purposes of the net income per unit calculation.
Pursuant to the partnership agreement, allocations to partners are made on a quarterly basis.
14. |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
a) |
|
The Partnerships consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended March
31, 2010 reflects the Dropdown Predecessor as if the Partnership had acquired the Dropdown
Predecessor when the vessels began operations under the ownership of Teekay Corporation.
For non-cash changes related to the Dropdown Predecessor, see Note 9. |
|
b) |
|
The contribution from the non-controlling interest owner described in Note 12a has been
treated as a non-cash transaction in the Partnerships consolidated statement of cash
flows. |
The Partnerships consolidated statement of income for three months ended March 31, 2011
includes a total write-down of $0.9 million for impairment on a 1993-built conventional tanker,
as the conventional tankers carrying value exceeded its estimated fair value. The fair value of
the conventional tanker was calculated based on the value of its estimated discounted cash flows
which primarily includes an estimated sales price of the vessel. The write-down is included within the
Partnerships conventional tanker segment.
Page 16 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2011
PART
I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 2 |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
OVERVIEW
We are an international provider of marine transportation, oil production and storage services to
the offshore oil industry. We operate shuttle tankers, floating storage and offtake (or FSO)
units, floating production, storage and offloading (or FPSO) units and conventional crude oil
tankers.
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS
On March 8, 2011, we acquired the remaining 49% interest in Teekay Offshore Operating L.P. (or
OPCO) from Teekay Corporation for a combination of $175 million in cash (less $15 million in
distributions made by OPCO to Teekay Corporation between December 31, 2010 and the date of
acquisition) and 7.6 million of common units (and associated General Partner interest) to Teekay
Corporation.
On October 1, 2010, we agreed to acquire from Teekay Corporation a newbuilding shuttle tanker, the
Peary Spirit, for approximately $133 million, concurrent with the commencement of its time-charter
contract in July 2011. Teekay Corporation is obligated to offer the Partnership an additional
shuttle tanker newbuilding (the Scott Spirit) within 365 days after its delivery, provided the
vessel is servicing a charter contract in excess of three years in length.
Potential Additional Shuttle Tanker, FSO and FPSO Projects
Pursuant to an omnibus agreement we entered into in connection with our initial public offering in
December 2006, Teekay Corporation is obligated to offer to us its interest in certain shuttle
tankers, FSO units, FPSO units and joint ventures it may acquire in the future, provided the
vessels are servicing contracts with remaining durations of three years or greater. We also may
acquire other vessels that Teekay Corporation may offer us from time to time in the future.
Pursuant to the omnibus agreement and a subsequent agreement, Teekay Corporation is obligated to
offer to sell to us the Petrojarl Foinaven FPSO, an existing FPSO unit of Teekay Petrojarl AS (or
Teekay Petrojarl), a wholly owned subsidiary of Teekay Corporation, prior to July 9, 2012. The
purchase price for the Petrojarl Foinaven FPSO would be its fair market value plus any additional
tax or other similar costs to Teekay Petrojarl that would be required to transfer the FPSO unit to
us.
On October 19, 2010, Teekay Corporation announced that it had signed a contract with Petroleo
Brasileiro SA (or Petrobras) to provide a FPSO unit for the Tiro and Sidon fields located in the
Santos Basin offshore Brazil. The contract with Petrobras will be serviced by a newly converted
FPSO unit, to be named the Petrojarl Cidade de Itajai, which is currently under conversion from an
existing Aframax tanker at Sembcorp Marines Jurong Shipyard in Singapore, for a total estimated
cost of approximately $370 million. This new FPSO is scheduled to deliver in the second quarter of
2012 when it will commence operations under a nine-year, fixed-rate time-charter contract with
Petrobras with six additional one-year extension options. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement,
Teekay Corporation is obligated to offer to us its interest in this FPSO unit at Teekay
Corporations fully built-up cost within 365 days after the commencement of the charter to
Petrobras.
Teekay Corporation recently entered into a joint venture agreement with Odebrecht Oil & Gas S.A. (a
member of the Odebrecht group) to jointly pursue FPSO projects in Brazil. Teekay Corporation
and Odebrecht are 50% partners in the Tiro Sidon FPSO project and are currently working on potential FPSO project opportunities which, pursuant to the omnibus agreement,
may result in the future sale of new FPSO units to us.
Teekay Corporation recently signed a Letter of Intent with a major oil and gas company to provide a
new harsh weather FPSO which will operate in the North Sea. Teekay Corporation has been involved
in the front-end engineering and design study for this project over the past several months, and is
currently working towards finalizing a contract with the customer. In connection with this
project, Teekay Corporation recently signed a conditional contract with Samsung Heavy
Industries to construct a newbuilding FPSO unit. If Teekay Corporation is awarded an operating
contract that is three years or greater in duration, pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Teekay
Corporation would be obligated to offer to us its interest in this FPSO project at Teekay
Corporations fully built-up cost within 365 days after the commencement of the charter.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
There are a number of factors that should be considered when evaluating our historical financial
performance and assessing our future prospects and we use a variety of financial and operational
terms and concepts when analyzing our results of operations. These can be found in
Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2010. In accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (or
GAAP), we report gross revenues in our income statements and include voyage expenses among our
operating expenses. However, shipowners base economic decisions regarding the deployment of their
vessels upon anticipated time charter equivalent (or TCE) rates, and industry analysts typically
measure bulk shipping freight rates in terms of TCE rates. This is because under time charters and
bareboat charters the customer usually pays the voyage expenses, while under voyage charters and
contracts of affreightment the shipowner usually pays the voyage expenses, which typically are
added to the hire rate at an approximate cost. Accordingly, the discussion of revenue below focuses
on net revenues (i.e. revenues less voyage expenses) and TCE rates of our four reportable segments
where applicable. TCE rates represent net revenues divided by revenue days. Please read Item 1
Financial Statements: Note 5 Segment Reporting.
We manage our business and analyze and report our results of operations on the basis of four
business segments: the shuttle tanker segment, the conventional tanker segment, the FSO segment and
the FPSO segment, each of which are discussed below.
Page 17 of 28
Shuttle Tanker Segment
As at March 31, 2011, our shuttle tanker fleet consisted of 35 vessels
that operate under fixed-rate contracts of affreightment, time charters and bareboat charters. Of
the 35 shuttle tankers, six were owned through 50% owned subsidiaries, three through a 67% owned
subsidiary and five were chartered-in. All of these shuttle tankers provide transportation services
to energy companies, primarily in the North Sea and Brazil. Our shuttle tankers service the
conventional spot market from time to time.
The following table presents our shuttle tanker segments operating results for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, and compares its net revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial
measure) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 to revenues, the most directly
comparable GAAP financial measure, for the same periods. The following table also provides a
summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days by owned and chartered-in vessels for our shuttle
tanker segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
138,232 |
|
|
|
141,993 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Voyage expenses |
|
|
19,028 |
|
|
|
29,054 |
|
|
|
(34.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
119,204 |
|
|
|
112,939 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
40,785 |
|
|
|
34,163 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
20,270 |
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
|
|
(19.0 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
27,432 |
|
|
|
24,955 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
12,482 |
|
|
|
11,260 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
931.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
17,008 |
|
|
|
17,404 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
3,141 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the shuttle tanker segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). |
The average size of our owned shuttle tanker fleet for the three months ended March 31, 2011
increased compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
the purchase from Teekay Corporation of two newbuilding shuttle tankers, the Amundsen
Spirit and the Nansen Spirit, in October 2010 and December 2010, respectively (or the 2010
Newbuilding Shuttle Tanker Acquisitions); and |
|
|
|
the acquisition of one previously chartered-in vessel in February 2010 by our majority
owned subsidiary (or the 2010 Shuttle Tanker Acquisition). |
The average size of our chartered-in shuttle tanker fleet decreased for the three months ended
March 31, 2011, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
the redelivery of two chartered-in vessels to their owners in February 2010 and November
2010, respectively; and |
|
|
|
the 2010 Shuttle Tanker Acquisition. |
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from the same period
last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $10.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to the 2010
Newbuilding Shuttle Tanker Acquisitions; |
|
|
|
an increase of $8.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to a net
increase in rates as provided in certain contracts of affreightment, bareboat and
time-charter contracts as well as from entering into new contracts during 2010; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to an increase
in reimbursable bunker costs as provided for in new contracts during 2010; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $11.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to fewer
revenue days from our shuttle tankers due to declining oil production at mature oil fields
in the North Sea and a decrease in revenue days in the conventional spot market from
decreased demand for conventional crude transportation; |
|
|
|
a net decrease of $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the
same period last year due to an increase in the number of offhire days resulting from more
scheduled drydockings in the time-chartered fleet and higher unexpected repair offhire
days; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to the
redelivery of one vessel in March 2011 as it completed its time-charter agreement; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to higher
bunker prices as compared to the same period last year. |
Page 18 of 28
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three months ended March 31,
2011 from the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to
the 2010 Newbuilding Shuttle Tanker Acquisitions; |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to
an increase in the number of vessels drydocked, and costs related to services and spares. Certain
repair and maintenance items are more efficient to complete while a
vessel is in drydock. Consequently, repair and maintenance costs will typically increase in
periods when there is an increase in the number of vessels drydocked; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 in
crew and manning costs as compared to the same period last year resulting primarily from a
planned increase in wages; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011
relating to the net realized and unrealized changes in fair value of our foreign currency
forward contracts that are or have been designated as hedges for accounting purposes; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011
relating to the settlement of a claim from a customer in 2010. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three months ended March 31,
2011 from the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $5.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to
the redelivery of two chartered-in vessels to their owners in February 2010 and November
2010; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to
the 2010 Shuttle Tanker Acquisition; |
|
|
|
an increase of $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to
increased spot in-chartering of vessels; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to
less off-hire in the in-chartered fleet; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to
an increase in rates on certain contracts in the in-chartered fleet. |
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 from the same period last year, primarily due to the 2010
Newbuilding Shuttle Tanker Acquisitions and the 2010 Shuttle Tanker Acquisition.
Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges were $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011 resulting from the termination of the charter contract of one of our vessels. Restructuring
charges were $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, relating to the completion of
the reflagging of seven of our vessels from Norwegian flag to Bahamian flag and a change in the
nationality mix of our crews. Under this plan, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately
$4.9 million in total since the plan began in 2009.
Conventional Tanker Segment
We have a fleet of 11 Aframax conventional crude oil tankers, nine of which operate under
fixed-rate time charters with Teekay Corporation. The remaining two vessels, which have additional
equipment for lightering, operate under fixed-rate bareboat charters with Skaugen PetroTrans,
Teekay Corporations 50% owned joint venture.
Page 19 of 28
The following table presents our conventional tanker segments operating results for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, and compares its net revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial
measure) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 to revenues, the most directly
comparable GAAP financial measure, for the same periods. The following table also provides a
summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days by owned vessels for our conventional tanker segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
35,763 |
|
|
|
31,565 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
6,146 |
|
|
|
5,651 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
29,617 |
|
|
|
25,914 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
5,825 |
|
|
|
5,714 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,045 |
|
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
Write-down of vessel |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
15,098 |
|
|
|
13,265 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the conventional tanker segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). |
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from the same period
last year primarily due to a net increase of $3.5 million in net bunker revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 due to an increase in bunker index prices compared to the same period
last year.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 from the same period last year primarily due to increased
drydockings in the last three quarters of 2010.
Write-down of Vessel. Write
down of vessel for the three months ended March 31, 2011 relates to the valuation impairment
of one conventional tanker. The vessels carrying value exceeded its estimated
fair value due to an expected sale of the vessel and termination of its existing charter
contract. The fair value of the vessel was written-down based on the value of its projected
discounted cash flows.
FSO Segment
Our FSO fleet consists of five vessels that operate under fixed-rate time charters or fixed-rate
bareboat charters. FSO units provide an on-site storage solution to oil field installations that
have no oil storage facilities or that require supplemental storage. Our revenues and vessel
operating expenses for the FSO segment are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, as
a significant component of revenues are earned and vessel operating expenses are incurred in
Norwegian Kroner and Australian Dollars for certain vessels. The strengthening of the U.S. Dollar
relative to the Norwegian Kroner and Australian Dollar may result in a significant decrease in our
revenues and a decrease in vessel operating expenses.
The following table presents our FSO segments operating results for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010, and compares its net revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP financial
measure, for the same periods. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in
calendar-ship-days for our FSO segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
17,491 |
|
|
|
20,650 |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
Voyage expenses |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
17,200 |
|
|
|
20,401 |
|
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
9,148 |
|
|
|
8,405 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
(41.3 |
) |
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Loss on sale of vessel |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
5,569 |
|
|
|
(83.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and
administrative expenses (allocated to the FSO segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). |
We acquired the Falcon Spirit from Teekay Corporation in April 2010. However, as a result of the
inclusion of the Dropdown Predecessor, the Falcon Spirit has been included for accounting purposes
in our results as if it was acquired on December 15, 2009, when the vessel began operations under
the ownership of Teekay Corporation. Please read Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this report.
Page 20 of 28
On March 18, 2011 we sold one of our FSO units, the Karratha Spirit for proceeds of $5.1 million,
resulting in a loss of $0.2 million. As described below, we committed to plans for termination of
the employment of certain seafarers of this vessel resulting in restructuring charges.
Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from the same
period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to
a lower charter rate on the Navion Saga in accordance with the charter contract that took
effect in the second quarter of 2010 and a one-time reimbursement from customers for
certain crewing costs in the three months ended March 31, 2010; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to
lower revenues related to the sale of the Karratha Spirit; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to
foreign currency exchange differences as compared to the same period last year. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased $0.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 from the same period last year, primarily due to the weakening of the U.S.
Dollar against the Australian Dollar compared to the same period last year.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation decreased by $2.2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 from the same period last year as the costs relating to the conversion of the Navion
Saga from a shuttle tanker to an FSO unit were fully depreciated at the end of the fixed term of
its contract in April 2010.
Loss on sale of vessel. Loss on sale of vessel for the three months ended March 31, 2011 relates
to the sale of the Karratha Spirit.
Restructuring charge. Restructuring charges for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were
incurred in connection with the termination of employment for certain of the crew members of the
Karratha Spirit following the sale of the vessel in March 2011.
FPSO Segment
Our FPSO fleet consists of the Petrojarl Varg and Rio das Ostras, which are owned by us and operate
under fixed-rate time charters. FPSO units provide production, processing and storage services to
oil companies operating offshore oil field installations. These services are typically provided
under long-term, fixed-rate charter contracts or FPSO service contracts. Historically, the
utilization of FPSO units and other vessels in the North Sea is higher in the winter months, as
favorable weather conditions in the summer months provide opportunities for repairs and maintenance
to our vessels and the offshore oil platforms, which generally reduces oil production.
The following table presents our FPSO segments operating results for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010 and also provides a summary of the calendar-ship-days for our FPSO segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
42,285 |
|
|
|
39,371 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
19,372 |
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,912 |
|
|
|
8,894 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
10,565 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the FPSO segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
We acquired the Rio das Ostras from Teekay Corporation in October 2010. However, as a result of
the inclusion of the Dropdown Predecessor, the Rio das Ostras has been included for accounting
purposes in our results as if it was acquired on April 1, 2008, when Teekay Corporation acquired
its initial 82% interest in the Rio das Ostras. Please read Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this report.
Revenues. Revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from the same period last
year, primarily due to a one-time accrual of $3.1 million relating to back-pay for services
previously rendered to the charterer of the Rio das Ostras.
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three months ended March 31,
2011 from the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to increased
repairs on the Rio das Ostras while on yard stay; |
|
|
|
increase of $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to planned
crewing and manning wage increases; and |
|
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to the
weakening of the U.S. Dollar against the Norwegian Kroner compared to the same period last year. |
Page 21 of 28
Other Operating Results
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $18.7 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $16.6 million for the same period last year mainly
relating to a one-time management fee charged to us by Teekay Corporation associated with the
portion of stock-based compensation grants of Teekay Corporations former Chief Executive Officer
that had not yet vested prior to the date of his retirement on March 31, 2011.
Interest Expense. Interest expense, which excludes realized and unrealized gains and losses from
interest rate swaps, decreased to $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $9.9
million for the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from the financing
of the Falcon Spirit and Rio das Ostras (including the Dropdown Predecessor) mainly due to
a decrease in debt balances; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 related to
scheduled repayments and prepayments of debt during 2011 and 2010; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 mainly related to
loan costs. |
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Non-designated Derivatives. Net realized and unrealized
gains (losses) on non-designated derivatives were $10.8 million for the three months ended March
31, 2011, compared to ($24.5) million for the same period last year, as detailed in the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Realized (losses) gains relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(13,702 |
) |
|
|
(12,787 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,284 |
) |
|
|
(12,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
20,765 |
|
|
|
(10,949 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
(584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,124 |
|
|
|
(11,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on
non-designated derivative instruments |
|
|
10,840 |
|
|
|
(24,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange (Losses) Gains. Foreign currency exchange losses were ($0.8) million for
the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to gains of $1.6 million for the same period last
year. Our foreign currency exchange losses and gains, substantially all of which are unrealized,
are due primarily to the relevant period-end revaluation of Norwegian Kroner-denominated monetary
assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes. Gains reflect a stronger U.S. Dollar
against the Norwegian Kroner on the date of revaluation or settlement compared to the rate in
effect at the beginning of the period. Losses reflect a weaker U.S. Dollar against the Norwegian
Kroner on the date of revaluation or settlement compared to the rate in effect at the beginning of
the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, foreign currency exchange losses and gains
include a realized gain of $0.7 million (2010 nil) and an unrealized gain of $6.2 million (2010
nil) on the cross currency swap.
Income Tax (Expense) Recovery. Income tax (expense) recovery was ($2.7) million for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $6.9 million for the same period last year. The $9.6
million increase to income tax expense was primarily due to an increase in deferred income tax
expense relating to unrealized foreign exchange translation gains.
Other Income. Other income was $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to
$2.5 million for the same period last year, which was primarily comprised of leasing income from
our volatile organic compound equipment. The leasing income is decreasing as the contracts near
completion.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity and Cash Needs
As at March 31, 2011, our total cash and cash equivalents were $123.4 million, compared to $166.5
million at December 31, 2010. Our total liquidity, including cash, cash equivalents and undrawn
long-term borrowings, was $381.9 million as at March 31, 2011, compared to $557.6 million as at
December 31, 2010. The decrease in liquidity is primarily the result of our acquisition of the
remaining 49% of OPCO from Teekay Corporation on March 8, 2011.
In addition to distributions on our equity interests, our primary short-term liquidity needs are to
fund general working capital requirements and drydocking expenditures, while our long-term
liquidity needs primarily relate to expansion and investment capital expenditures and maintenance
capital expenditures and debt repayment. Expansion capital expenditures are primarily for the
purchase or construction of vessels to the extent the expenditures increase the operating capacity
of or revenue generated by our fleet, while maintenance capital expenditures primarily consist of
drydocking expenditures and expenditures to replace vessels in order to maintain the operating
capacity of or revenue generated by our fleet. Investment capital expenditures are those capital
expenditures that are neither maintenance capital expenditures nor expansion capital expenditures.
Page 22 of 28
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and undrawn long-term borrowings, in
addition to all other sources of cash including cash from operations, will be sufficient to meet
our existing liquidity needs for at least the next 12 months. Generally, our long-term sources of
funds are from cash from operations, long-term bank borrowings and other debt or equity financings,
or a combination thereof. Because we distribute all of our available cash, we expect that we will
rely upon external financing sources, including bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity
securities, to fund acquisitions and expansion and investment capital expenditures, including
opportunities we may pursue under the omnibus agreement with Teekay Corporation and other of its
affiliates.
Cash Flows. The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
61,318 |
|
|
|
73,951 |
|
Net cash
flow used for financing activities |
|
|
(106,079 |
) |
|
|
(40,555 |
) |
Net cash flow from investing activities |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
Operating
Cash Flows. Net cash flow from operating activities decreased to
$61.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2011, from $74.0 million for the same period in 2010, due primarily to
fewer revenue days from our shuttle tanker operations, an increase in drydock expenditures and
restructuring charges, and a lower charter rate on one of our FSO units, partially offset by a net
increase in changes to non-cash working capital items, increased rates on our shuttle tankers, the
acquisitions of the Amundsen Spirit and Nansen Spirit shuttle tankers, increases in the bunker
index prices and daily hire rates on our conventional fleet and the redelivery of two in-chartered
vessels.
Financing Cash Flows. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, scheduled debt repayments and
prepayments on debt totaled $94.8 million. Net proceeds from long-term debt of $177.6 million were
mainly used to finance our acquisition of the remaining 49% of OPCO from Teekay Corporation.
On March 22, 2010, we completed a public offering of 5.1 million common units (including 660,000
common units acquired by the underwriters upon exercise of their overallotment option). The total
net proceeds from the offering (including our General Partners total contribution of $2.0 million)
were $96.1 million. The net proceeds were used to repay the remaining $60.0 million of the Teekay
Corporation vendor financing related to the September 2009 acquisition of the Petrojarl Varg and to
finance a portion of the April 2010 acquisition of Teekay Corporations interest in the Falcon
Spirit.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, scheduled debt repayments and prepayments on debt
totaled $122.0 million.
Cash distributions paid by our subsidiaries to non-controlling interests during the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 totaled $17.4 million and $19.5 million, respectively. Cash
distributions paid by us to our unitholders and our General Partner during the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, totaled $27.7 million and $17.7 million, respectively. Subsequent to March
31, 2011, cash distributions related to the three months ended March 31, 2011 of
$33.6 million was declared and subsequently paid on May 13, 2011.
Investing
Cash Flows. During the three months ended March 31, 2011,
net cash flow from investing activities was $1.7 million
relating to $5.1 million in proceeds from the
vessel sale and scheduled lease payments of $5.5 million received from the leasing
of our volatile organic compound emissions equipment and direct
financing lease assets, partially offset by expenditures for vessels
and equipment.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, net cash flow from investing activities was $5.1
million, primarily relating to scheduled lease payments of $6.2 million received from the leasing
of our volatile organic compound emissions equipment and direct financing lease assets, partially
offset by expenditures for vessels and equipment.
Credit Facilities
As at March 31, 2011, our total debt was $1.81 billion, compared to $1.72 billion as at December
31, 2010. Our revolving credit facilities and term loans are described in Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 6 Long-Term Debt of this report. All of our vessel financings are collateralized
by the applicable vessels. As a result of our acquiring the remaining 49% limited partner interest
in OPCO in March 2011, our obligations under the Bond Agreement related to our issuance of NOK 600
million in senior unsecured bonds are now guaranteed by us. The term loans used to finance five of
our 50% owned subsidiaries and our revolving credit facility agreements contain typical covenants
and other restrictions, including, in some cases, those that restrict the relevant subsidiaries
from:
|
|
|
incurring or guaranteeing indebtedness; |
|
|
|
changing ownership or structure, including by mergers, consolidations,
liquidations and dissolutions; |
Page 23 of 28
|
|
|
making dividends or distributions when in default of the relevant loans; |
|
|
|
making capital expenditures in excess of specified levels; |
|
|
|
making certain negative pledges or granting certain liens; |
|
|
|
selling, transferring, assigning or conveying assets; or |
|
|
|
entering into a new line of business. |
We conduct our funding and treasury activities within corporate policies designed to minimize
borrowing costs and maximize investment returns while maintaining the safety of the funds and
appropriate levels of liquidity for our purposes. We hold cash and cash equivalents primarily in
U.S. Dollars.
Contractual Obligations and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations as at March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
Beyond |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
|
1,805.2 |
|
|
|
122.0 |
|
|
|
551.8 |
|
|
|
852.8 |
|
|
|
278.6 |
|
Chartered-in vessels (Operating leases) |
|
|
146.5 |
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
79.6 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
|
1,951.7 |
|
|
|
168.0 |
|
|
|
631.4 |
|
|
|
873.7 |
|
|
|
278.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $19.3 million (remainder of 2011), $37.0 million (2012
and 2013), $9.6 million (2014 and 2015) and $5.1 million (beyond 2015). Expected interest
payments are based on LIBOR, plus margins which ranged between 0.30% and 3.25% as at March 31,
2011, and on NIBOR plus a margin of 4.75%. |
Critical Accounting Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make
estimates in the application of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions, judgments
and opinions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions,
estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly
and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined
with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such
differences could be material. Accounting estimates and assumptions discussed in this section are
those that we consider to be the most critical to an understanding of our financial statements,
because they inherently involve significant judgments and uncertainties. For a further description
of our material accounting policies, please read Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2011, the shuttle tanker segment had goodwill attributable to it. As of the date of
this filing, we do not believe that there is a reasonable possibility that the goodwill
attributable to this reporting unit might be impaired within the next year. However, certain
factors that impact this assessment are inherently difficult to forecast and as such we cannot
provide any assurances that an impairment will or will not occur in the future. An assessment for
impairment involves a number of assumptions and estimates that are based on factors that are beyond
our control. These are discussed in more detail in the following section entitled Forward-Looking
Statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 6-K for the three months ended March 31, 2011 contains certain forward-looking
statements (as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) concerning future
events and our operations, performance and financial condition, including, in particular,
statements regarding:
|
|
|
our future growth prospects; |
|
|
|
results of operations and revenues and expenses; |
|
|
|
offshore and tanker market fundamentals, including the balance of supply and
demand in the offshore and tanker market; |
|
|
|
future capital expenditures and availability of capital resources to fund
capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
offers of shuttle tankers, FSOs and FPSOs and related contracts from Teekay
Corporation and our accepting the offers; |
|
|
|
obtaining offshore projects that we or Teekay Corporation bid on or may be
awarded; |
|
|
|
delivery dates of and financing for newbuildings or existing vessels; |
|
|
|
vessel operating and crewing costs for vessels; |
Page 24 of 28
|
|
|
entrance into joint ventures and partnerships with companies; |
|
|
|
the commencement of service of newbuildings or existing vessels; |
|
|
|
the duration of drydockings; |
|
|
|
potential newbuilding order cancellations; |
|
|
|
the future valuation of goodwill; |
|
|
|
our compliance with covenants under our credit facilities; |
|
|
|
our hedging activities relating to foreign exchange, interest rate and spot
market risks; |
|
|
|
the ability of the counterparties for our derivative contracts to fulfill
their contractual obligations; and |
|
|
|
our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, particularly in Norwegian
Kroner. |
Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast,
indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words believe,
anticipate, expect, estimate, project, will be, will continue, will likely result,
plan, intend or words or phrases of similar meanings. These statements involve known and
unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently subject
to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual
results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited
to: changes in production of oil from offshore oil fields; changes in the demand for offshore oil
transportation, production and storage services; greater or less than anticipated levels of vessel
newbuilding orders or greater or less than anticipated rates of vessel scrapping; changes in
trading patterns; changes in the Partnerships expenses; changes in applicable industry laws and
regulations and the timing of implementation of new laws and regulations; potential inability to
implement our growth strategy; competitive factors in the markets in which we operate; potential
for early termination of long-term contracts and our potential inability to renew or replace
long-term contracts; loss of any customer, time charter or vessel; shipyard production or vessel
delivery delays; our potential inability to raise financing to purchase additional vessels; our
exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations; changes to the amount of proportion of revenues
and expenses denominated in foreign currencies; and other factors detailed from time to time in our
periodic reports filed with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2010. We do not intend to release publicly any updates or revisions to any
forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with respect
thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Page 25 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2011
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 3 |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our floating-rate
borrowings. Significant increases in interest rates could adversely affect operating margins,
results of operations and our ability to service debt. From time to time, we use interest rate
swaps to reduce exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates. The principal objective of
these contracts is to minimize the risks and costs associated with the floating-rate debt.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, we only enter into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A- or better by Standard & Poors or A3 or better by Moodys at the
time of the transactions. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps
are entered into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
The tables below provide information about financial instruments as at March 31, 2011 that are
sensitive to changes in interest rates. For long-term debt, the table presents principal payments
and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For interest rate swaps,
the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by expected contractual
maturity dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
after |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages) |
|
Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate (2) |
|
|
122.0 |
|
|
|
201.5 |
|
|
|
350.3 |
|
|
|
799.1 |
|
|
|
53.7 |
|
|
|
278.6 |
|
|
|
1,805.2 |
|
|
|
(1,713.4 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount (3) |
|
|
116.7 |
|
|
|
226.3 |
|
|
|
132.0 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
|
216.8 |
|
|
|
746.8 |
|
|
|
1,530.3 |
|
|
|
(154.8 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (2) |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for our debt, including the
margin paid on our floating-rate debt and the average fixed pay rate for interest rate swaps.
The average fixed pay rate for interest rate swaps excludes the margin paid on the
floating-rate debt, which as of March 31, 2011 ranged between 0.30% and 3.25% based on LIBOR
and 4.75% based on NIBOR. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Interest payments on floating-rate debt and interest rate swaps are based on LIBOR and NIBOR. |
|
|
(3) |
|
The average variable receive rate for interest rate swaps is set quarterly at the 3-month
LIBOR or semi-annually at the 6-month LIBOR. |
Foreign Currency Fluctuation Risk
Our functional currency is U.S. dollars because virtually all of our revenues and most of our
operating costs are in U.S. Dollars. We incur certain vessel operating expenses and general and
administrative expenses in foreign currencies, the most significant of which is the Norwegian
Kroner and, to a lesser extent, Australian Dollars, British Pounds, Euros and Singapore Dollars.
There is a risk that currency fluctuations will have a negative effect on the value of cash flows.
We may continue to seek to hedge certain of our currency fluctuation risks in the future. At March
31, 2011, we were committed to the following foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Expected Maturity |
|
|
|
in Foreign Currency |
|
|
Forward |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Rate (1) |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
Norwegian Kroner |
|
|
515,000 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
$ |
43,812 |
|
|
$ |
37,585 |
|
British Pound |
|
|
3,840 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
Euro |
|
|
14,323 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
13,058 |
|
|
|
6,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60,777 |
|
|
$ |
45,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average forward rate represents the contracted amount of foreign currency one U.S. Dollar
will buy. |
We incur interest expense on our Norwegian Kroner-denominated bonds. We have entered into a cross
currency swap to economically hedge the foreign exchange risk on the principal and interest. As at
March 31, 2011, we were committed to one cross currency swap with the notional amounts of NOK 600
million and $98.5 million, which exchanges a receipt of floating interest based on NIBOR plus a
margin 4.75% with a payment of floating interest based on LIBOR plus a margin of 5.04%. In
addition, the cross currency swap locks in the transfer of principal to $98.5 million upon maturity
in exchange for NOK 600 million.
Although the majority of transactions, assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. Dollars, we
had Norwegian Kroner-denominated deferred income taxes of approximately 59.7 million ($10.8
million) at March 31, 2011. We have not entered into any forward contracts to protect against
currency fluctuations on any future taxes.
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to changes in forecasted bunker fuel costs for certain vessels being
time-chartered-out and for vessels servicing certain contracts of affreightment. We may use bunker
fuel swap contracts as economic hedges to protect against changes in bunker fuel costs. As at
March 31, 2011, we were not committed to any bunker fuel swap contracts.
Page 26 of 28
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2011
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1 |
|
Legal Proceedings |
See Item 8. Financial Information Legal Proceedings in our Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report on Form 6-K, you should
carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 3. Key Information Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
|
Item 2 |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
|
|
|
Item 3 |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
|
|
|
Item 5 |
|
Other Information |
None
None
THIS REPORT ON FORM 6-K IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FOLLOWING REGISTRATION
STATEMENT OF THE PARTNERSHIP:
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (NO. 333-147682) FILED WITH THE SEC ON NOVEMBER 28,
2007 |
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (NO. 333-174221) FILED WITH THE SEC ON MAY 13, 2011 |
Page 27 of 28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Teekay Offshore GP L.L.C., its general partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 26, 2011 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Peter Evensen
Peter Evensen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
Page 28 of 28