UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

þ Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

o Transition Report to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number 1-11415

AMERICAN STANDARD COMPANIES INC.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (732) 980-6000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes þ      No o

The aggregate market value of the voting stock (Common Stock) held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the close of business on June 30, 2004 was approximately $8.6 billion based on the closing sale price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date. The company does not have any non-voting common equity.

Number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of Common Stock, as of the close of business on February 18, 2005: Common Stock, $.01 par value, 214,501,304 shares.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Important Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

     Certain of the statements contained in this report (other than the historical financial data and other statements of historical fact), including, without limitation, statements as to management’s expectations and beliefs, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s good faith expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect upon the Company. There can be no assurance that future developments will be in accordance with such expectations or that the effect of future developments on the Company will be those anticipated by management. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “plans,” “strategy,” “prospects,” “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “intends” and other words of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. For further information as to important risks and factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s expectations, see “Item 1. Business”, “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements.”

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

     American Standard Companies Inc. (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation formed in 1988 to acquire all the outstanding common stock of American Standard Inc., a Delaware corporation (“American Standard Inc.”) incorporated in 1929. “American Standard” or the “Company” refers to the Company, or to the Company and American Standard Inc. or American Standard International Inc. (“ASII”), its wholly-owned subsidiary, including their subsidiaries, as the context requires.

Business Segments

     American Standard is a global, diversified manufacturer of high-quality, brand-name products in three major business segments: air conditioning systems and services; bath and kitchen fixtures and fittings; and vehicle control systems. American Standard is one of the largest providers of products in each of its three major business segments. An overview of each of the segments follows below.

Air Conditioning Systems and Services Segment (“Air Conditioning”)

     Air Conditioning Systems and Services is a global manufacturer of commercial and residential heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment, systems and controls. It also provides aftermarket parts to the HVAC industry, performance contracting for the installation and maintenance of HVAC systems featuring its products, and service for its products and those of other manufacturers. Air Conditioning markets and sells its products and services globally under the TRANE^â name and, for U.S. residential and light commercial applications, under both the TRANE^â and AMERICAN STANDARD^â names.

     Air Conditioning, with revenues of $5.345 billion in 2004, accounted for 56% of Company sales and 56% of its segment income. Approximately 60% of Air Conditioning’s revenue in 2004 was derived from sales of equipment, parts and services to the replacement, renovation and repair market segment, and the remainder was derived from new construction. Revenue from the commercial and residential markets accounted for approximately 75% and 25%, respectively, of Air Conditioning’s total revenue in 2004. In 2004, Air Conditioning derived 27% of its revenue from sales outside the U.S. For sales by geographic region and end markets, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

     The products manufactured by Air Conditioning include chillers and air handlers, light and large commercial unitary equipment, heat pumps, residential condensing units and furnaces, and fan coils. Air Conditioning also produces a wide range of HVAC controls: from electromechanical controls on its equipment, to thermostats that regulate room and building temperature, to integrated building automation systems that automatically control a building’s performance, including its energy consumption, air quality and comfort.

     Air Conditioning has a broad global network of company-owned and independent agents and distributors distributing its products primarily through two separate distribution channels: a commercial channel and a “dealer” channel. The commercial channel is served by 188 company-owned and independent commercial sales offices (CSOs), about half in the U.S. and Canada and the remainder throughout Europe, mid-East, Latin America and Asia Pacific regions. CSOs sell equipment, systems and controls primarily to mechanical contractors and building owners’ agents, such as architects and consulting engineers. A growing area is sales direct to building owners, primarily through national account relationships with owners or operators that manage a distributed network of facilities such as retail and hospitality chains, federal, state and local governments and agencies, and process manufacturers (e.g., pharmaceuticals and electronics). In addition to selling original equipment, the Trane CSOs also manage a network of over 120 parts centers serving the needs of company-owned and independent HVAC service companies. In North America and Europe, the CSOs also have an extensive network of service technicians and applications engineers that provide design, installation, consulting and maintenance services and controls contracting. Outside the U.S. and

1

Canada, in addition to servicing the commercial channel, CSOs sell residential products to independent dealer/installers.

     In the U.S. and Canada, the dealer channel is served by Company-owned sales offices and independent wholesale distributors with over 500 stocking locations who sell residential and light commercial unitary products (up to 25 tons) to dealers and contractors who sell and install the equipment. Trane brand residential products are also well positioned in the retail sales channel through an arrangement with Home Depot, the leading home improvement retailer, through which certain central heating and air conditioning systems are marketed to residential customers.

     Air Conditioning competes in all of its markets on the basis of the breadth, quality and reliability of its products and services, technological leadership, energy efficiency, price and value. Air Conditioning’s major competitors for residential products in the U.S. are Carrier, York, Rheem, Lennox and Goodman Industries. Major competitors of Air Conditioning’s commercial equipment in the U.S. and Canada are Carrier, York and McQuay. Major competitors of Air Conditioning’s control products in the U.S. and Canada are Johnson Controls, Siemens and Honeywell International Inc.

     As of December 31, 2004, Air Conditioning Systems and Services employed approximately 26,500 people and had 29 manufacturing plants in 10 countries.

Bath and Kitchen Segment

     Bath and Kitchen is a leading producer of bathroom and kitchen fixtures and fittings in Europe, the U.S., Central America and Asia. Its products, including sinks, toilets, faucets, tubs, showers, bathroom furniture and accessories, are marketed through retail and wholesale sales channels for residential and commercial markets.

     In 2004, Bath and Kitchen, with revenues of $2.440 billion, accounted for 26% of the Company’s sales and 20% of its segment income. Bath and Kitchen derived 66% of its total 2004 sales from operations outside the U.S. For sales by geographic region and end markets, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

     Bath and Kitchen sales in 2004 were derived 51% from chinaware fixtures, 29% from fittings (typically brass), 9% from tubs, with the remainder from related bath and kitchen products. Throughout the world these products are generally sold through wholesalers and installed by plumbers and contractors. In the U.S., a significant and growing number of products are also sold through home improvement centers. In total, sales to the residential market account for approximately 79% of Bath and Kitchen sales, with sales to the commercial and industrial markets providing the remainder.

     Bath and Kitchen operates through three primary groups that are regionally focused: Europe, Americas and Asia

     Bath and Kitchen sells products in Europe primarily under the brand names IDEAL STANDARD, JADO, ARMITAGE SHANKS, DOLOMITE and PORCHER. The Company is currently increasing its focus on expanding the presence and scope of offerings of the Ideal Standard brand. It manufactures and distributes bathroom and kitchen fixtures and fittings through subsidiaries or joint ventures in Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, the U.K., Spain, and distributes products in other European countries.

     Bath and Kitchen Americas Group manufactures bathroom and kitchen fixtures and fittings selling under the brand names AMERICAN STANDARD, STANDARD, PORCHER and JADO (manufactured in Europe) in the U.S. and under the brand names AMERICAN STANDARD, IDEAL STANDARD, and STANDARD through the Company’s wholly-owned operations in Mexico, Canada and Brazil, its majority-owned joint venture in Central

2

America and its unconsolidated joint venture in the Dominican Republic.

     In Asia, Bath and Kitchen manufactures bathroom and kitchen fixtures and fittings, selling under the brand names AMERICAN STANDARD, IDEAL STANDARD, and STANDARD through the Company’s wholly-owned operations in South Korea and Indonesia, and its majority-owned operations in Thailand and Vietnam. The group also operates in China through a majority-owned joint venture, which has ownership interests in seven joint ventures.

     The Company’s bath and kitchen products are sold in the replacement and remodeling market and the new construction market. The replacement and remodeling market accounts for about 60% of the Company’s European and Americas sales and about 17% of the sales in Asia, where there is more growth in new construction. In the U.S., the replacement and remodeling markets have shown substantial growth over the last few years and the Company has benefited from that growth. In Europe, the replacement and remodeling markets have historically been more stable than the new construction markets and have shown moderate growth over the past several years. The U.S. residential new construction market grew strongly in 2004 and the two prior years while the commercial new construction market grew slightly in 2004 but declined in 2003 and 2002. The residential new construction and commercial new construction markets in Europe have been rather static overall, with the exception of Germany, which declined in each of those years. The new construction market, in which builders or contractors make product selection, is more price-competitive than the replacement and remodeling market. In the replacement and remodeling market, consumers make the model selections and, therefore, this market is more responsive to quality and design than price, making it the principal market for higher-margin luxury products. Through expansion of manufacturing in low-cost locations, Bath and Kitchen has become more competitive, enabling it to increase sales of products in the lower and middle segments of both the new construction and remodeling markets.

     In an effort to capture a larger share of the replacement and remodeling market, Bath and Kitchen has introduced a variety of new product designs, new products with best-in-class performance characteristics and suites and collections designed to suit a variety of customer tastes. New offerings include additional colors and ensembles, bathroom suites designed by internationally known designers and electronically controlled products. The new Champion toilet, with America’s Best™ Flushing System, established strong presence and achieved good distribution in the wholesale and retail channels at product margins that are better than the category average. In Europe, Bath and Kitchen is increasing its focus on health and wellness through its bathing and showering businesses via new products, increased functionality and the addition of new consumer benefits. Faucet technology programs are focused on anti-leak, anti-scald, filtering and other features to meet emerging consumer and legislative requirements. The “total bathroom” concept, which, provides customers and consumers with fully coordinated and integrated suites of products, including sinks, toilets, faucets, tubs, showers, bathroom furniture and accessories, has been used successfully and broadly in Europe and Asia, is being expanded in the U.S. retail channel. Bath and Kitchen is also continuing programs to expand its presence in high-quality showrooms and showplaces featuring its higher-end products in certain countries. These programs, along with expanded sales training activities, have enhanced the image of the Company’s products with interior designers, decorators, consumers and plumbers.

     In the U.S., Bath and Kitchen products are marketed through both the wholesale and retail channels. Sales through the retail home center market channel have become a significant part of Bath and Kitchen sales (approximately 19% in 2004), but represent only approximately 5% of total Company sales.

     Many of the Company’s bathtubs sold in the U.S. are made from a proprietary porcelain-on-metal composite, AMERICAST^â. Products made with AMERICAST have only one-half the weight of cast iron products and are resistant to breaking and chipping. AMERICAST products are easier to ship, handle and install and are less expensive to produce than cast iron products. Use of this advanced composite has been extended to kitchen sinks and bathroom lavatories. In Europe, a similar composite called IDEALCAST is also used on acrylic-surfaced products.

     As of December 31, 2004, Bath and Kitchen employed approximately 27,700 people and, including affiliated companies, had 63 manufacturing plants in 25 countries.

     Bath and Kitchen has several major competitors in foreign markets, for the most part operating nationally. Friederich Grohe, the major manufacturer of fittings in Europe, is a pan-European competitor. In Europe, Sanitec and Roca are the major fixtures competitors and, in Asia, Toto is the major competitor. In the U.S., Bath and

3

Kitchen has several major competitors, including Kohler and, in selected product lines, Masco (Delta) and Fortune Brands (Moen). Bath and Kitchen competes in most of its markets on the basis of service to customers, product quality and design, reliability, price and value.

Vehicle Control Systems Segment

     Vehicle Control Systems, operating under the WABCO^â name (“WABCO”), designs, manufactures and sells braking and control systems primarily for the worldwide commercial vehicle industry. WABCO’s largest-selling products are pneumatic braking control systems and related electronic braking controls (“ABS” and “EBS”) and conventional components for heavy and medium-sized trucks, trailers and buses. In 2004 WABCO, with sales of $1.724 billion, accounted for 18% of the Company’s sales and 24% of its segment income. 78% of its 2004 revenue was derived from sales in Europe. The Company believes that WABCO is the worldwide technology leader for braking, stability, suspension and transmission controls for commercial vehicles. WABCO has a strong reputation for technological innovation and is a leading systems development partner with several major vehicle manufacturers. Electronic controls, first introduced in ABS in the early 1980s, are increasingly applied in other control systems sold to the commercial vehicle industry. WABCO also supplies electronic suspension controls to the luxury car and sport utility vehicle market.

     WABCO’s products are sold directly to vehicle and component manufacturers. Spare parts are sold through both original equipment manufacturers and an independent aftermarket distribution network. Although the business is not dependent on a single or related group of customers, sales of truck braking systems are dependent on the demand for heavy trucks. Some of the Company’s largest customers are DaimlerChrysler (Mercedes and Freightliner), Ford, GMC, Hino, Iveco (Fiat), MAN, Nissan, Paccar (Paccar and DAF), Scania, Volvo (Volvo and RVI) and Volkswagen. WABCO’s principal competitor is Knorr/Bremse. WABCO competes primarily on the basis of customer service, quality and reliability of products, global technological leadership, vehicle life-cycle expertise and price and value. For sales by geographic region and end markets, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

     The Western European market for new truck and bus production increased 17% in 2004 following an increase of 3% in 2003 and a decrease of 8% in 2002. The Brazilian market increased 23% in 2004 following an increase of 10% in 2003 and a decrease of 10% in 2002. During the years 2000 through 2004, WABCO has generally outperformed the heavy vehicle manufacturing markets as a whole, primarily from increased content per vehicle and improved market penetration.

     In North America, WABCO markets ABS and other vehicle control products through its fifty percent-owned, unconsolidated joint venture with Arvin Meritor Automotive Inc. (“Meritor WABCO”). In 2004, the North American truck market grew 34% following a 1% increase in 2003. In 2002, the North American truck market experienced 12% growth as U.S. customers actively purchased vehicles before the change in diesel engine emissions regulations affecting trucks manufactured after October 1, 2002.

     WABCO has developed an advanced electronic braking system, stability control systems, electronically controlled air suspension systems, automated transmission controls, tire pressure monitoring, automatic climate-control and door-control systems for the commercial vehicle industry. These systems have resulted in greater sales per vehicle for WABCO. WABCO participates in the passenger car market with an advanced, electronically controlled air suspension system now featured by the three leading German luxury car manufacturers. WABCO has expanded the air suspension system family to other luxury car and sport utility vehicle manufacturers in Europe and North America. A leading European truck manufacturer now includes WABCO electronic controls for automated transmissions in heavy vehicles as standard equipment. The Company believes that automated transmission control will be increasingly important in the industry. Other new products under development include further advancements in electronic braking, stability and safety controls, and driveline-control and suspension-control systems.

     Vehicle Control Systems is headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. Its principal manufacturing operations are in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Poland, the Netherlands, Brazil and South Korea. In the U.S., the Meritor WABCO joint venture supplies the North American truck manufacturing market. The Company also has a majority-

4

owned partnership in the U.S. with Cummins Engine Co. (WABCO Compressor Manufacturing Co., a manufacturing partnership formed to produce air compressors designed by WABCO), and a majority-owned joint venture in China with MAFF to produce conventional products for the local market and export. In addition, WABCO has minority equity investments in joint ventures in India with TVS Group (Sundaram Clayton Ltd.) and in South Africa (WABCO SA).

     As of December 31, 2004, WABCO and affiliated companies employed approximately 6,700 people and had 11 manufacturing facilities and 17 sales organizations operating in 24 countries.

Business Segment Data

     Information concerning sales and segment income attributable to each of the Company’s business segments and geographic areas is set forth in Item 6, “Selected Financial Data,” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and in Note 15 of Notes to Financial Statements, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Information concerning identifiable assets of each of the Company’s business segments is set forth in Note 15 of Notes to Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference. Information on backlogs and the seasonal aspects of the Company’s business are set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” under the captions “Results of Operations by Business Segment” and “Cyclical and Seasonal Nature of Business,” respectively.

Company Goals

     American Standard has adopted the following performance goals:

     Materials Management

     The Materials Management initiative is centered on leveraging collective buying power on a global basis to improve purchasing efficiency, reduce the number of suppliers and improve the supply chain. Materials Management also involves working with suppliers to develop effective components with lower part counts and easier assembly, resulting in improved quality and reduced costs. It is also intended to identify opportunities to substitute lower-cost materials for higher-cost ones, without compromising quality, durability and safety. With material costs representing a significant portion of total costs, management believes that continued improvements realized through Materials Management could result in substantial savings.

5

     Management continues to adopt challenging goals for continuous performance improvement. In 2004, improvements from Materials Management programs were able to offset increasing commodity costs related to the purchase of steel, copper, aluminum and energy, which negatively impacted the Company by $98 million. Incremental benefits from this program were approximately $37 million in 2004, $100 million in 2003 and $105 million in 2002. The Company expects to incur approximately $200 million in additional costs from the commodities mentioned above, in 2005. The Company expects to generate savings from its Materials Management initiative that will significantly offset these additional costs.

     Six Sigma

     Six Sigma is a structured approach to achieving significant productivity improvements in business and manufacturing processes through data-driven decisions. Originally introduced to American Standard in 2000, more than 20,000 employees have been trained in Six Sigma tools that have contributed approximately $170 million in productivity gains.

     The Company continues to develop and deploy technical experts (called Six Sigma Master Black Belts, Black Belts and Green Belts) through aggressive training and project deployment programs. By the end of 2004, the Company had 44 Master Black Belts, 673 Black Belts and 4,302 Green Belts who were certified or in training. To achieve such a designation, specific projects, timelines, milestones and savings must be achieved. Management is continually broadening the Six Sigma approach to cover functions beyond manufacturing. In the past two years it has provided specific Six Sigma training in safety, Materials Management, transactional analysis and design, deployment of new products, lean manufacturing, sales/marketing, maintenance and administrative processes.

     Linkage of Goals with Incentive Compensation Plans

     Management has adopted incentive compensation plans that are directly linked to achievement of the company-wide goals described above. Management believes the attainment of these goals will result in improved financial performance and enhanced shareholder value.

General

     Raw Materials

     The Company purchases a broad range of materials and components throughout the world in connection with its manufacturing activities. Major items include steel, copper tubing, aluminum, ferrous and nonferrous castings, clays, motors, electronics and energy. The ability of the Company’s suppliers to meet performance and quality specifications and delivery schedules is important to the Company’s operations. Since 2000, the Company has integrated much of its raw materials procurement efforts into its Materials Management initiative. The energy and materials required for its manufacturing operations have been readily available. Although the Company does not foresee any significant raw material shortages, it does expect to incur higher costs for certain commodity raw materials in 2005. Also see “Company Goals–Materials Management.”

6

     Patents, Licenses and Trademarks

     The Company’s operations are not dependent to any significant extent upon any single or related group of patents, licenses, franchises or concessions. The Company’s operations also are not dependent upon any single trademark, although some trademarks are identified with a number of the Company’s products and services and are of importance in the sale and marketing of such products and services. Some of the Company’s trademarks are:

     The Company from time to time has granted patent licenses to, and has licensed technology from, other parties.

7

     Research and Product Development

     The Company made expenditures of $206 million in 2004, $192 million in 2003 and $185 million in 2002 for research and product development and for product engineering in its three business segments. The expenditures for research and product development alone were $140 million in 2004, $128 million in 2003 and $129 million in 2002 and were incurred primarily by Vehicle Control Systems and Air Conditioning Systems and Services. Vehicle Control Systems, which expended the largest amount, has conducted research and development in recent years on advanced electronic braking systems, stability control systems, electronically controlled air suspension systems, automated transmission controls, tire pressure monitoring, automatic climate-control and door-control systems for the commercial vehicle industry. Air Conditioning Systems and Services’ research and development expenditures were primarily related to alternative refrigerants, compressors, heat transfer surfaces, airflow technology, acoustics and micro-electronic controls. Expenditures made by Bath and Kitchen related primarily to enhancing the functionality, performance and design of its products.

     Regulations and Environmental Matters

     The Company’s U.S. operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The Company has a number of proactive programs underway to minimize its impact on the environment and believes that it is in substantial compliance with environmental laws and regulations. A number of the Company’s plants are undertaking responsive actions to address soil and groundwater issues. In addition, the Company is a party to a number of remedial actions under various federal and state environmental laws and regulations that impose liability on companies to clean up, or contribute to the cost of cleaning up, sites at which hazardous wastes or materials were disposed or released. Remedial actions to which the Company is a party include approximately 28 current proceedings under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund) and similar state statutes in which the Company has potential liability based either on a past or current ownership interest in the site requiring remedial actions or based on disposal or alleged disposal of waste products at the site requiring remedial actions. Expenditures in 2004, 2003 and 2002 to evaluate and remediate such sites were not material.

     Additional sites may be identified for environmental remediation in the future, including properties previously transferred by the Company and with respect to which the Company may have contractual indemnification obligations. The Company cannot estimate at this time the ultimate aggregate costs of all remedial actions because of (a) uncertainties surrounding the nature and application of environmental regulations, (b) the Company’s lack of information about additional sites at which it may be listed as a potentially responsible party, (c) the level of cleanup that may be required at specific sites and choices concerning the technologies to be applied in corrective actions, (d) the number of contributors and the financial capacity of others to contribute to the cost of remediation at specific sites and (e) the time periods over which remediation may occur. On the basis of the Company’s historical experience and information currently available, these environmental actions should not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

     The Company’s international operations are also subject to various environmental statutes and regulations. Generally, these requirements tend to be no more restrictive than those in effect in the U.S. Currently, 19 of the Company’s international operations have ISO 14001 certification, and the Company believes it is in substantial compliance with existing domestic and foreign environmental statutes and regulations. As in the U.S., a number of the Company’s facilities are undertaking responsive actions to address groundwater and soil issues. Expenditures in 2004, 2003 and 2002 to evaluate and remediate these sites were not material. On the basis of the Company’s historical experience and information currently available, these environmental actions should not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

     The Company has derived significant revenues in recent years from sales of Air Conditioning Systems and Services using chlorofluorocarbons (“CFCs”) and hydrochloroflurocarbons (“HCFCs”). Production of certain CFCs, HCFCs and other chemicals with ozone-depletion potential is being phased out over various periods under regulations that require use of substitute permitted refrigerants in new equipment. Also, utilization of new refrigerants will encourage replacement or modification of existing air conditioning equipment. The Company believes that these regulations will have the effect of generating additional product sales and parts and service revenues, as existing air conditioning equipment utilizing CFCs or HCFCs, is converted to operate on other

8

refrigerants or replaced. The Company is unable to estimate the magnitude or timing of these conversions or replacements. The Company has been working closely with refrigerant manufacturers that are developing refrigerant substitutes for CFCs and HCFCs, so that the Company’s products will be compatible with those substitutes. Although some of the Company’s commercial, residential and light commercial products will require modification for refrigerant substitutes, the Company does not expect any significant problems in complying with this changing regulatory environment.

     Certain federal and state statutes, including the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987, as amended, impose energy efficiency standards for certain of the Company’s air conditioning systems. The Company is a leader in developing energy-efficient products that meet or exceed these standards. However, providing more energy-efficient products will require additional research and development expense and capital expenditures for air conditioning manufacturers to continue to offer energy-efficient product choices to the customer. The Company believes that it has adequate financial resources to fund these efforts.

     Employees

     The Company employed approximately 61,500 people as of December 31, 2004 (excluding employees of unconsolidated joint venture companies). The Company has 16 major labor union contracts in the Americas (covering approximately 11,500 employees); three of which (covering approximately 2,200 employees) expired in 2004 and were renegotiated. Five of these contracts expire in 2005 (covering approximately 2,200 employees), and three expire in 2006 (covering approximately 2,600 employees). In addition, five contracts in Mexico (covering 4,500 employees) are negotiated on an annual basis. There can be no assurance that the Company will negotiate the labor contracts expiring during 2005 without a work stoppage. However, the Company does not anticipate any problems in renegotiating these contracts that would materially affect operational results.

     The Company also has 30 major labor contracts outside North America (covering approximately 22,000 employees). The Company does not anticipate any problems in renegotiating these contracts that would materially affect operational results.

     In March 2002, 450 Air Conditioning Systems and Services employees went on strike for approximately three weeks at the Ft. Smith, AR manufacturing facility. Since that time there have been no significant work stoppages. Although the Company believes relations with its employees are good, there can be no assurance that the Company will not experience significant work stoppages in the future.

     Customers

     The business of the Company taken as a whole is not dependent upon any single customer or a few customers.

     International Operations

     The Company conducts operations through subsidiaries in most of the countries of Western Europe, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Poland, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Central American countries, China, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan, Vietnam and Egypt. In addition, the Company conducts business in some of these countries and in other countries through affiliated companies and partnerships in which the Company owns 50% or less of the stock or partnership interest. Because the Company has manufacturing operations in 28 countries, fluctuations in currency exchange rates may have a significant impact on its financial statements. Such fluctuations have much less effect on local operating results, because the Company to a significant extent sells its products within the countries in which they are manufactured. However, a growing portion of the Company’s products are manufactured in lower-cost locations and sold in various countries, resulting in increased exposure to foreign exchange effects. The asset exposure of foreign operations to the effects of exchange volatility has also been partly mitigated by the denomination in foreign currencies of a portion of the Company’s borrowings. The Company is also subject to political risks related to its foreign operations.

9

Available Information

     The Company’s Web site is www.americanstandard.com. Our periodic reports and all amendments to those reports required to be filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through the Web site. During the period covered by this report, the Company posted its periodic reports on Form 10-K and 10-Q and its current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those documents to its Web site as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports were filed or furnished electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company will continue to post to its Web site such reports and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. There were no amendments to the Company’s periodic reports in 2004, 2003 and 2002.

Availability of Corporate Governance Principles and Board of Director Committee Charters

     The Board of Directors has adopted charters for its Audit Committee, Management Development and Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Board has also adopted Corporate Governance Principles, which include the Company’s Definition of Director Independence. The Corporate Governance Principles and each of the charters are available on the Company’s Web site. These materials, together with the Code of Conduct and Ethics referenced below, are available in print to any shareholder who requests them in writing by contacting the Secretary of the Company at One Centennial Avenue, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

     The Company’s Code of Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all employees, including all executive officers and senior financial officers (including the Chief Financial Officer and the Controller) and directors, is posted on its Web site www.americanstandard.com. The Code of Conduct and Ethics is compliant with Item 406 of SEC Regulation S-K and the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. Any changes to the Code of Conduct and Ethics that affect the provisions required by Item 406 of Regulation S-K will also be disclosed on the Web site. Any waivers of the Code of Conduct and Ethics for our executive officers, directors or senior financial officers must be approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and those waivers, if any are ever granted, would be disclosed on our Web site under the caption “Exemptions to the Code of Conduct and Ethics.” There have been no waivers to the Code of Conduct and Ethics.

New York Stock Exchange Annual Chief Executive Officer Certification

     The Company’s Chief Executive Officer submitted the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) Annual CEO Certification as to the Company’s compliance with the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards to the NYSE on May 7, 2004

Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 Certifications

     The certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have been filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K.

10

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

     As of February 23, 2005, the Company conducted its manufacturing activities through 103 plants in 28 countries of which the principal facilities are:

     All of the plants described above are owned by the Company or a subsidiary except for the properties located in Taipei, Taiwan; Monterrey, Mexico (Air Conditioning); and Claye-Souilly, France, which are leased. The Company considers that its properties are generally in good condition, are well maintained, and are generally suitable and adequate to carry on the Company’s business. In 2004, the Company’s manufacturing plants, taken as a whole, operated moderately below capacity.

     The Company also owns or leases warehouse and office space for administrative and sales staff. The Company headquarters, which is leased, is located in Piscataway, New Jersey.

11

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     In October 1999, in Haynes Trane Service Agency, Inc. and Frederick M. Haynes v. American Standard, Inc., d/b/a The Trane Company, in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, verdicts were returned against the Company for a total of $18 million on the claim that it wrongfully terminated distribution agreements. On August 28, 2002, the appellate court ruled in favor of the Company and vacated the $18 million judgment. The appellate court also reinstated the Company’s counterclaims, including fraud, and remanded to the trial court limited portions of Haynes’ initial claims. Currently, there is no date set for a new trial on such claims.

     As previously reported, in November 2004 the Company was contacted by the European Commission as part of an industry-wide investigation into alleged infringement of European Union competition regulations relating to the distribution of bath and kitchen fixtures and fittings in certain European countries. In February 2005, the Company was named as a defendant in several lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and in various state courts in the State of California alleging that the Company and certain of its competitors conspired to fix prices for fittings and fixtures in the U.S. On February 23, 2005, the Company received a grand jury subpoena from the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice seeking information primarily related to the sale and marketing of bathroom fittings by its European affiliates from January 1997 to the present.

     On February 16, 2005, the French Competition Council issued a statement of objections (“notification de griefs”) addressed to more than 100 separate enterprises, including a Bath and Kitchen subsidiary of the Company, and to various trade associations and purchasing organizations active in the sanitary, heating, air-conditioning and canalization equipment and installation sectors. The addressees of the statement of objections are alleged to have restricted the distribution of products to large “do-it-yourself” retailers and to small installer cooperatives in France in the period 1993 through 1998 in violation of the French and European Union competition regulations.

     The Company is cooperating fully with these investigations and intends to vigorously defend itself against these lawsuits. The Company believes that the resolution of the matters described above would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or liquidity of the Company but could be material to the Company’s operating results for the periods in which the liabilities, if any, would be recognized.

     Over the years, the Company has been named as a defendant in numerous lawsuits alleging various asbestos-related personal injury claims arising primarily from sales of boilers and railroad brake shoes. In these asbestos-related lawsuits, the Company is usually named as one of a large group of defendants, often in excess of one hundred companies. Many of these lawsuits involve multiple claimants, do not specifically identify the injury or disease for which damages are sought and/or do not allege a connection between any Company product and a claimed injury or disease. As a result, numerous lawsuits have been placed and may remain on inactive or deferred dockets, which some jurisdictions have established.

     Historically, the Company recorded a liability only for filed asbestos claims. Costs associated with claims that might be filed against the Company in the future were not recorded because the Company did not believe its history and experience with asbestos-related litigation was sufficient to allow it to make a reasonable estimate of this liability. Because of stabilization in the rate at which new claims are being filed and the Company’s added experience in resolving claims, the Company now believes a reasonable estimate of this liability can be made.

     In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company retained Dr. Francine F. Rabinovitz of Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler, Inc. (“HR&A”) to assist it in calculating an estimate of the Company’s total liability for pending and unasserted potential future asbestos-related claims. Dr. Rabinovitz is a respected expert in performing complex calculations such as this. She has been involved in a number of asbestos-related valuations of current and future liabilities, and her valuation methodologies have been accepted by numerous courts.

     The methodology used by HR&A to project the Company’s total liability for pending and unasserted potential future asbestos-related claims relied upon and included the following factors:

12

     Based on these factors, HR&A calculated a total estimated liability for the Company to resolve all pending and unasserted potential future claims through 2055, which is HR&A’s reasonable best estimate of the time it will take to resolve asbestos-related claims, of $699 million. This amount is on a pre-tax basis, not discounted for the time-value of money, and excludes legal fees. Based on HR&A’s analysis, in the fourth quarter of 2004 the Company increased its recorded liability for asbestos claims by $616 million, from $83 million to $699 million.

     As of December 31, 2004, the Company recorded an increase in the receivable for probable asbestos-related insurance recoveries of $309 million. This represents amounts due to the Company for previously settled and paid claims and the probable reimbursements relating to its estimated liability for pending and future claims. In calculating this amount, the Company used the estimated asbestos liability for pending and projected future claims calculated by HR&A. It also considered the amount of insurance available, gaps in coverage, applicable deductibles, allocation methodologies, solvency ratings and credit-worthiness of the insurers, the published dividend rates of insolvent insurers, amounts already recovered from and the potential for settlements with insurers, and estimated annual legal fees.

     In the 4^th quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a non-cash charge to income of $307 million ($188 million after tax), which, is the difference between the amount by which the Company increased its total estimated liability for pending and projected future asbestos-related claims and the amount the Company expects to recover from insurers with respect to that increased liability. This difference is due primarily to gaps in coverage, deductibles associated with the policies and settlements for less than the full coverage limits with carriers in insolvency proceedings and carriers with questionable credit-worthiness (“Gaps, Deductibles and Discounts”). In addition, because some insurance policy buy-out arrangements result in insurers paying the Company before liability payments are due to claimants, such settlements typically take into account the time-value of money and include some discount to reflect the early payment. This discount also contributes to the gap between the recorded liability and the recorded insurance receivable.

     The Company is in litigation against certain carriers whose policies it believes provide coverage for pending claims. The insurance carriers named in this suit are challenging the Company’s right to recovery. While the Company cannot predict the outcome of this litigation with certainty, the Company believes that the amount recorded is probable of recovery based on its analysis of the coverage, the applicable law, historical trends in its and other insured parties’ settlements with insurers and the likelihood of achieving a settlement with some or all of the insurers.

     The aggregate amount of the stated limits in insurance policies available to the Company for asbestos-related claims, acquired over many years and from many different carriers, is substantial, significantly exceeding the projected liability against the Company. However, limitations in that coverage, primarily due to Gaps, Deductibles and Discounts, are expected to result in the projected total liability to claimants and related expenses exceeding the probable insurance recovery. The Company settled with most of the insolvent carriers and carriers with poor credit quality whose policies it believes provide coverage for pending and projected future claims. 85% of the remaining recorded insurance recovery receivable will be from carriers rated A or better by AM Best.

     The amounts recorded by the Company for asbestos-related liability and insurance-related receivables are based on currently known facts. The Company’s actual expenses or insurance recoveries could be significantly higher or lower than those recorded if assumptions used in the Company’s or HR&A’s calculations vary significantly

13

from actual results. Key variables in these assumptions are identified above and include the number and type of new claims to be filed each year, the average cost of disposing of each such new claim, average annual defense costs, the resolution of coverage issues among insurance carriers including allocation methodologies, and the solvency risk with respect to the Company’s insurance carriers. Furthermore, predictions with respect to these variables are subject to greater uncertainty as the projection period lengthens. Other factors that may affect the Company’s liability and ability to recover under its insurance policies include uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, reforms that may be made by state and federal courts, and the passage of state or federal tort reform legislation.

     In 2003, the Company began a program of seeking recovery from excess carriers on the lower layers of its coverage. By early February 2005, the Company had reached significant settlements on two elements of this coverage, KWELM Management Services Ltd (“KWELM”) and Underwriters at Lloyd’s London through Equitas (“Equitas”).

     In July 2004, the Company agreed to a settlement with KWELM, as agent for various London-based carriers in bankruptcy, for a small portion of the Company’s insurance coverage, of which $29.5 million was received in the third quarter of 2004. In connection with the future liquidation of the bankruptcy trust the Company may receive additional payments.

     In February 2005, the Company reached agreement with Equitas, the London-based entity responsible for certain pre-1993 Lloyd’s of London policies in its insurance coverage, in the amount of $84.5 million. During the first quarter of 2005, $10 million of this will be paid directly to the Company to cover past asbestos and environmental costs, and $74.5 million will be placed in a trust until January 3, 2007. If during the trust period there is federal legislation that takes asbestos claims out of the courts and requires Equitas to make a duplicate payment to the asbestos trust, this money will be used by Equitas for the legislative payment less some allowance to the Company for claims settlements that may be made in the period January 1, 2005 through January 3, 2008. If there is no such legislation by January 3, 2007, the funds in the trust, including accrued interest, will be disbursed to the Company.

     From receipt of its first asbestos claim more than twenty years ago to December 31, 2004, the Company has resolved 25,389 claims, and settlements of approximately $51 million have been made, for an average payment per claim of $2,003. The table below provides additional information regarding asbestos-related claims filed against the Company, reflecting updated information for all periods.

     Because claims are frequently filed and settled in large groups, the amount and timing of settlements, as well as the number of open claims, can fluctuate significantly from period to period. This is demonstrated by the fact that approximately 40% of all claims filed against the Company were filed in a 20-plus year period prior to 2002, 40% were filed in the 16-month period from January 2002 through April 2003, and the remaining 20% were spread relatively evenly over the next 20 months through December 2004. The Company believes that the dramatic increase in filings in the 16-month period from January 2002 through April 2003 was influenced by the bankruptcy filings of numerous asbestos defendants in asbestos-related litigation and the prospect of various forms of state and federal judicial and legislative reforms.

     For a discussion of environmental issues see “Item 1. Business–General–Regulations and Environmental Matters.” See also Note 14 of Notes to Financial Statements.

14

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     No matter was submitted to a vote of the Company’s shareholders during the fourth quarter of 2004.

ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

     The following table sets forth certain information as of February 23, 2005 with respect to each person who is an executive officer of the Company:

     Each officer of the Company is elected by the Board of Directors to a term of office expiring on the date of the first Board meeting after the Annual Meeting of Shareholders next succeeding his or her election or such officer’s earlier resignation or removal.

     Set forth below is the principal occupation of each of the executive officers named above during the past five years.

     Mr. Poses was elected as a Director in October 1999 and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2000. Prior to assuming that position, Mr. Poses was President and Chief Operating Officer at AlliedSignal Inc. (now known as Honeywell). Previously he was President of AlliedSignal’s Engineered Materials sector from 1988 to 1998 and served as Director of that company from 1997 until 1999. Mr. Poses is a Director of Raytheon Company and Centex Corporation.

     Mr. Costello was elected Senior Vice President, Human Resources, effective June 2000. From April 1994 until that date, he served in various capacities at Campbell Soup Company, including Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources.

     Mr. D’Aloia was elected Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective February 2000. Prior to that he was employed by AlliedSignal Inc., most recently serving as Vice President-Business Development. He spent 27 years with AlliedSignal Inc. in diverse management positions, including Vice President-Taxes, Vice President and Treasurer, Vice President and Controller, and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for the Engineered Materials sector. Mr. D’Aloia is a Director of FMC Corporation and AirTran Airways.

     Mr. Dwyer was elected Senior Vice President of the Company and President, Bath and Kitchen effective September 2004. Prior to joining the Company, he spent a decade in senior executive roles with major consumer enterprises, including PepsiCo Inc., where he served as President of Tropicana Products, North America, Vice President of Merger Integration and Senior Vice President, Marketing North America during his career.

15

     Ms. Gustafsson was elected Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company effective January 2005. From January 2003 until January 2005, Ms. Gustafsson served as chief counsel for the air conditioning systems and services business of the Company. Upon joining the Company in September 2001 until January 2003, she served as chief corporate counsel with responsibility for corporate legal activities for the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Gustafsson spent five years with Allied Signal Inc./Honeywell where she held positions of increasing responsibility including chief counsel to Allied Signal Inc./Honeywell’s $1 billion electronic materials business.

     Mr. Kissel was elected Senior Vice President of the Company in January 1998 and serves as President of Trane Commercial Systems, effective January 2004. From 1998 through December 2003 he served as President of Vehicle Control Systems. Before that he was Vice President of Air Conditioning Systems and Services’ Unitary Products Group, and later named Group Executive.

     Mr. Esculier was elected President of Vehicle Control Systems effective January 1, 2004. He joined the company in June 2002 as Vice President of Trane’s International Commercial Systems business in Europe. Prior to that he spent more than six years in a variety of leadership positions with AlliedSignal Inc./Honeywell.

     Mr. Massengill was elected Vice President and Treasurer effective April 2001 and assumed additional responsibility for Business Services Operations in January 2004. He was Assistant Treasurer of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company from 1999 to March 2001 and before that was with AlliedSignal Inc. and Exxon Corporation (now ExxonMobil) in various financial management positions.

     Mr. Pannier was elected Vice President of the Company in January 1998, and since January 2002 has served as President, Residential Systems. From January 1998 until January 2002 he served as Group Executive, North American Unitary Products Group.

     Mr. Paradise was elected Vice President and Controller in July 2002. He joined the Company as Assistant Controller in February 2000. Prior to that he spent ten years with AlliedSignal Inc. where he held financial positions of increasing responsibility, including Director of Six Sigma and Credit, after beginning his career with PricewaterhouseCoopers as an auditor.

16

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

     The common stock of the Company is listed on The New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”) under the symbol “ASD.” The common stock was first traded on the Exchange on February 3, 1995 concurrent with the underwritten initial public offering of shares of the Company’s common stock. Prior to the offering there was no established public trading market for the Company’s shares.

     The Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, authorizes the Company to issue up to 560,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, of which the Board of Directors designated 900,000 shares as a new series of Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock. The Company also has a Rights Agreement. Each outstanding share of common stock has associated with it one right to purchase a specified amount of Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock at a stipulated price in certain circumstances relating to changes in ownership of the common stock of the Company.

     On May 27, 2004, the Company completed a three-for-one common stock split.

     As of February 15, 2005 there were 702 holders of record of the Company’s common stock. A significant number of the outstanding shares of common stock which are beneficially owned by individuals or entities are registered in the name of a nominee of The Depository Trust Company, a securities depository for banks and brokerage firms. The Company believes that there are approximately 65,700 beneficial owners of its common stock as of February 14, 2005.

     On January 31, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share of outstanding common stock. The quarterly dividend will be paid on March 25, 2005 to all common shareholders of record as of February 28, 2005.

     Set forth below are the high and low sales prices for shares of the Company’s common stock for each quarterly period in 2003 and 2004. The 2003 and first and second quarter of 2004 prices have been adjusted for the Company’s three-for-one stock split. The split became effective May 27, 2004, for holders of record as of May 18, 2004.

     On February 3, 2005 the Company’s Board of Directors approved an additional $400 million to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in the open market. As of February 11, 2005, the unexpended authorization on the current program, together with amounts remaining under prior programs totaled $412,236,204. The Company plans to expend $400 million for share repurchases in 2005. A summary of the repurchase activity for 2004 follows. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a description of the Company’s stock repurchase program. All share and per-share amounts reflect the three-for-one stock split effective May 27, 2004.

17

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

18

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

     (b) In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a $307 million ($188 million, net of tax benefit, or $.85 per diluted share) charge covering estimated net payments for pending and future asbestos-related claims. Certain reclassifications were made to prior periods to reflect asbestos indemnity charges, to be consistent with 2004. For a detailed description of the asbestos indemnity charge, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

     (c) In 2000, the Company sold its Calorex water heater business for a gain of $57 million ($52 million after tax, or $.24 per diluted share).

19

     (d) In 2000, the Company recorded a net restructuring and asset impairment charge of $70 million ($51 million, net of tax benefits, or $.24 per diluted share). These charges consisted of $26 million for Air Conditioning Systems and Services, $34 million for Bath and Kitchen and $15 million for Vehicle Control Systems, partly offset by a $5 million reduction of charges taken in prior years.

     For a comparative analysis of certain line items in the Segment and Income Statement Data section of this table, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” which follows.

20

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

     American Standard has three business segments: Air Conditioning Systems and Services, Bath and Kitchen and Vehicle Control Systems. The Company achieved record sales and segment income for the full year of 2004. Sales were $9.509 billion, up 11% from $8.568 billion a year ago and segment income was $984.3 million up 18% from a year ago. Earnings were $1.42 per diluted share, down 22% from $1.83 per diluted share a year ago. The Company generated $764.7 million in net cash provided by operating activities and reduced debt by $171 million to $1.508 billion. Management believes that the Company’s sales growth outperformed or was in line with most of its markets in 2004, with all segments contributing to the gain. The 18% increase in Segment Income in 2004 as compared with 2003, was driven primarily by a 41% increase in Bath and Kitchen and a 31% increase in Vehicle Control Systems. The primary drivers of the increase were improved volume and mix, savings from our Materials Management and Six Sigma programs, benefits from 2003 job eliminations, foreign exchange and price improvements in Bath and Kitchen. These increases were partially offset by higher raw material commodity costs, primarily in Air Conditioning and investments and other cost escalations in all of our businesses. 2004 segment income included $46.1 million ($31.8 million net of a $14.3 million tax benefit, or $.15 per diluted share) of operational consolidation expenses, primarily for the elimination of 1,694 jobs as compared with 2003 which included expenses of $38.9 million ($27.3 million net of an $11.6 million tax benefit, or $.12 per diluted share) for the elimination of 870 jobs as a result of streamlining actions initiated in the fourth quarter of 2003. The 2003 job eliminations contributed $30 million of savings in 2004. The 2004 actions are expected to result in approximately $30 million of savings in 2005. Additionally, the Company expects to incur approximately $200 million in higher raw material commodity costs in 2005. These costs are expected to be significantly offset by savings from our Materials Management initiative. The reason for the decline in earnings per diluted share in 2004 as compared with 2003, was a charge of $307 million ($188 million net of a $119 million tax benefit, or $.85 per diluted share) covering estimated net payments for pending and future asbestos-related claims, which was recorded in the fourth quarter. For a detailed description of the asbestos indemnity charge, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings. The income tax provision for 2004 included a $39.2 million tax benefit ($.18 per diluted share) from the following items: $18.5 million from the resolution of tax audits, $18 million related to a reduction in withholding tax liabilities arising from a decision to not distribute the earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and $2.7 million related to the benefit recognized on other tax items. The combined effect of the $39.2 million tax benefits that occurred in 2004, the $119 million tax benefit related to the asbestos indemnity charge, together with other ongoing tax planning activities, reduced the effective income tax rate to 13.6% for the year. Without the $39.2 million of tax benefits discussed above and the asbestos indemnity charge and the related tax benefit, the tax rate for 2004 would have been 31%.

     The following discussion and analysis addresses year-over-year changes in the line items shown in the Summary Segment and Income Statement Data in Item 6, “Selected Financial Data”. Year-over-year changes in segment sales and segment income and, in certain cases, segment operating margins, for 2004 compared with 2003 and 2003 compared with 2002 are presented both with and without the effects of foreign exchange translation. Presenting results of operations excluding the translation effects of foreign exchange amounts is not in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), but management analyzes the data in this manner because it is useful to them in understanding the operational performance of the business. Management also uses data adjusted in this manner for purposes of determining incentive compensation. Accordingly, management believes that presenting the analysis in this manner is also useful to shareholders in understanding the core business segment operating results and trends. Approximately half of our business is outside the U.S., therefore changes in exchange rates can have a significant effect on results of operations when presented in U.S. dollars. Changes in sales and segment income excluding foreign exchange effects are calculated using current year sales and segment income translated at prior year exchange rates. These additional measurements are not meant to be a substitute for measurements prepared in conformity with GAAP, nor to be considered in isolation.

     For a five-year summary of segment sales and segment income and other income statement information, refer to Item 6, “Selected Financial Data” on page 19, and for additional data on segments refer to Note 15 of Notes to Financial Statements. The following discussion and analysis addresses year-to-year changes in certain line items shown in the

21

Segment and Income Statement Data in the Selected Financial Data on page 19. The Geographic Distribution of Sales is presented based upon country of destination.

Results of Operations for 2004 Compared with 2003 and 2003 Compared with 2002

     Consolidated sales for 2004 were $9.509 billion, an increase of $941 million or 11% (7% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), from $8.568 billion in 2003. Sales increased 7% for Air Conditioning Systems and Services, 9% for Bath and Kitchen and 27% for Vehicle Control Systems.

     Segment income for 2004 was $984.3 million, an increase of $146.6 million, or 18% (14% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), from $837.7 million in 2003. Segment income increased 7% for Air Conditioning Systems and Services, 41% for Bath and Kitchen and 31% for Vehicle Control Systems. Segment income for 2004 included $46.1 million of operational consolidation expenses, primarily for the elimination of 1,694 jobs, comprised of $7.7 million for Air Conditioning Systems and Services, $33.0 million for Bath and Kitchen and $5.4 million for Vehicle Control Systems. Segment income for 2003 included $38.9 million of expense for the elimination of 870 jobs, comprised of $8.4 million for Air Conditioning Systems and Services, $20.8 million for Bath and Kitchen and $9.7 million for Vehicle Control Systems.

     Consolidated sales for 2003 were $8.568 billion, an increase of $773 million, or 10% (5% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), from $7.795 billion in 2002. Sales increased 5% for Air Conditioning Systems and Services, 12% for Bath and Kitchen and 28% for Vehicle Control Systems.

     Segment income for 2003 was $837.7 million, an increase of $7 million, or 1% (a decrease of 4% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), from $830.8 million in 2002. Segment income increased 27% for Vehicle Control Systems, but decreased 3% for Air Conditioning Systems and Services and 10% for Bath and Kitchen. Segment income for 2003 included $38.9 million of expense for the elimination of 870 jobs, comprised of $8.4 million for Air Conditioning Systems and Services, $20.8 million for Bath and Kitchen and $9.7 million for Vehicle Control Systems.

22

     Following are tables showing the percentage of total sales and segment income for each of the Company’s business segments and the geographic distribution of sales and segment income.

Results of Operations by Business Segment

Air Conditioning Systems and Services Segment

     In 2004, sales of Air Conditioning Systems and Services increased 7% (6% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects).

     Following is an analysis of changes in sales, segment income and operating margin from 2003 to 2004 showing the effect of foreign exchange translation.

23

     The sales gain in 2004 was led by an 11% increase in residential air conditioning sales in the U.S., and a 13% (9% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects) increase in international commercial equipment sales. Sales in commercial parts, services and solutions were up 8% (6% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), sales in North American unitary were up 5%, in line with North American unitary equipment markets and sales in North American applied equipment were down 6%. The commercial equipment market in the U.S. was up an estimated 4% in 2004 (based upon preliminary Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration Institute (“ARI”) data for commercial unitary markets and our own estimates for applied markets), following drops of 5% in 2003 and 11% in 2002. 2004 marks the first year that the commercial equipment markets have increased since 2000. The North American unitary equipment market was up an estimated 5% and the North American applied equipment market was up an estimated 3% for the year. The increasing demand for unitary products in the U.S. has led to better pricing. The Company announced commercial equipment price increases of 2-3% in the second quarter of 2004 and additional price increases of 3-5% in the fourth quarter of 2004. International sales were led by strong sales in Latin America and Asia. Commercial Equipment markets in Europe and the Middle East continue to improve slowly, while Asia Pacific markets overall remain strong. Sales in China were stronger in the fourth quarter of 2004 than in the first three quarters. Equipment prices outside of the U.S. were down modestly for the year as markets continued to be more competitive.

     Sales of our U.S. residential products increased 11% in 2004 as compared with 2003. The residential unitary markets were up an estimated 9% in 2004 based upon data published by ARI. Residential sales benefited from a strong demand for replacement units and a shift in demand towards high-efficiency units. Our strong position in the premium, high efficiency residential market was evidenced by an increase in sales of new, higher efficiency models. We implemented a price increase of up to 5%, effective December 1, 2004 following a 3% increase in the second quarter. Additionally, we strengthened our residential distribution as we continued to upgrade our current dealer network and sign new dealers. Our market share in the residential unitary market was essentially flat in 2004 as compared with 2003. Inventory levels at our distributors at the end of 2004 are slightly higher than they have been the past few years.

     Segment income of Air Conditioning Systems and Services in 2004 increased 7% (6% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects) to $556.1 million from $521.6 million in 2003. The increase in segment income was driven by higher volume and improved mix in the international commercial equipment business and in residential products, including a favorable shift in customer demand to higher-capacity, higher-efficiency products with higher margins, and savings from productivity initiatives. The higher volume, improved mix and productivity savings were moderated by higher commodity metal prices, investments in new products and technologies and cost escalations. Overall margins decreased from 10.5% in 2003 to 10.4% in 2004. Segment income for 2004 included $7.7 million of operational consolidation expenses, primarily from the elimination of 205 jobs. Segment income for

24

2003 included $8.4 million of job elimination costs.

     Following is an analysis of changes in sales, segment income and operating margin from 2002 to 2003 showing the effect of foreign exchange translation.

     The sales gain in 2003 was led by a 10% increase in residential air conditioning sales in the U.S., and an 8% increase in commercial parts, service and solutions sales. Those increases were partly offset by lower sales in the North American and European applied equipment markets. In our commercial air conditioning business, sales performance was in line with the equipment markets on a global basis. Commercial equipment sales, which account for approximately 45% of the air conditioning segment sales, continued to feel the effects of a difficult economic environment and were flat year over year (down 2% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects). Commercial applied equipment sales decreased 3% and commercial unitary equipment sales decreased 1% on an exchange-adjusted basis, with the unitary business achieving sales gains in the second half of the year. The commercial equipment market in the U.S. was down an estimated 5% in 2003 (based upon ARI data), following drops of 11% in 2002 and 8% in 2001. This represents a cumulative decline of 22% since 2000. Customers continued to defer replacement of equipment, which accounted for about 57% of our equipment sales, and we estimate that non-residential construction activity in the U.S. declined approximately 4% year over year. Overall, we believe our share remained stable in these commercial markets, which, were weak, and price competitive. Sales of parts, services and solutions continued to grow, with double-digit growth rates outside the U.S. and 4% growth domestically. Sales of parts and solutions were strongest, as customers have less discretion to defer those types of purchases, with lower growth in routine services, where customers have more flexibility to defer spending. Sales outside the U.S., which are substantially commercial, grew 13% (7% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), led by strong growth in Asia.

     We outperformed the domestic residential unitary market, which was up 2% for 2003 compared with 2002, based upon data published by ARI. In addition, the furnace market was up an estimated 2%. Residential sales benefited from strong demand for replacement units and a shift in demand towards high-efficiency units. Our strong position in the premium, high-efficiency market was evidenced by a substantial sales increase of new higher-efficiency models. Sales of our high-efficiency furnaces were up approximately 20% for 2003 compared with the prior year. We also saw growth in our marketing arrangement with Home Depot through which certain residential central heating and air conditioning systems are offered. The Company’s market share for residential products increased slightly more than one-half percentage point year over year, aided by the successful introduction of new products.

25

     Segment income of Air Conditioning Systems and Services in 2003 decreased 3% (4% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects) to $521.6 million from $537.4 million in 2002. The decrease was attributable primarily to lower volume, price, and unfavorable mix in applied and unitary products in the commercial equipment business. Additionally, segment income for 2003 included $8.4 million of expense for the elimination of 234 jobs primarily in the U.S. The declines mentioned above were partly offset by improved results in the residential business, from higher volumes and a favorable shift in customer demand to higher-capacity, higher-efficiency products with higher margins, and growth in commercial parts, service and solutions. Operating results also improved in all international operations, where segment income almost doubled. The positive impact of Materials Management and Six Sigma productivity initiatives offset cost escalations and investments in new product initiatives. Overall margins decreased from 11.3% in 2002 to 10.5% in 2003.

     BACKLOG–The worldwide backlog for Air Conditioning Systems and Services as of December 31, 2004, was $663 million, an increase of 15% (13% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects) from December 31, 2003. This increase primarily reflected an increase in commercial equipment markets in North America. Backlog is not necessarily predictive of future business as it relates only to some of our products and services. We expect markets to be up slightly in 2005.

Bath and Kitchen Segment

     Following is an analysis of changes in sales, segment income and operating margin from 2003 to 2004 showing the effect of foreign exchange translation.

26

     Sales by Bath and Kitchen were $2.440 billion in 2004, an increase of 9% (4% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), from $2.235 billion in 2003. Sales in the Americas increased 5% (with little effect from foreign exchange translation), which came on top of 4% growth in 2003 (3% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects). Sales in 2004 benefited from sales of our Champion toilet, expanded marketing and promotional efforts and continued growth in the remodeling market in the U.S. Champion is having a positive impact on sales and margins in both wholesale and retail channels in the U.S. Both Home Depot and Lowe’s featured the Champion product line in circulars, magazines and promotions and we continue to feature Champion in television advertisements and public relations programs. We believe these programs not only benefit the Champion product line, but also help create awareness and interest in all American Standard products. Sales in the retail channel continue to grow, benefiting from our expanded luxury product offerings. In Europe, where our business is larger and our margin structure is better, sales increased 12% (2% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects). In Europe, where economic growth is slow, we continued to strengthen our market positions. We launched new suites and faucets and we introduced new products for the showering and wellness markets, which are the fastest growing segments in Europe. Additionally, we continued to strengthen our position in Eastern Europe. In Asia, sales increased 11% (10% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), off a small but growing base. The new residential market in China grew at a slower pace in 2004, and our sales were essentially in line with the market. We continued to work on the development of several new products, product extensions and technologies and increased our investments in marketing and brand programs.

     Segment income of Bath and Kitchen was $196.9 million for 2004, an increase of 41% (35% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects) from $139.5 million for 2003. Operating margin was 8.1%, up from 6.2% in 2003. Segment income and margins for 2004 benefited from volume and price increases, mix improvement and productivity savings including the benefits of 2003 job eliminations. We continued to invest in new products with better performance features, new suite introductions, and our “total bathroom” strategy. We continued to decrease costs and improve productivity through Materials Management and Six Sigma initiatives. Segment income in 2004 included $33 million of operational consolidation expenses for the closure of two facilities and the elimination of 1,338 jobs in the Americas, Europe and Asia. Segment income in 2003 included $20.8 million of expense for the elimination of 526 jobs in the Americas and Europe. Excluding the $33 million of operational consolidation expenses in 2004, the $20.8 million of job elimination expenses in 2003 and foreign exchange translation effects, operating margin would have been up 240 basis points for 2004 as compared to 2003.

     Following is an analysis of changes in sales, segment income and operating margin from 2002 to 2003 showing the effect of foreign exchange translation.

27

     Sales by Bath and Kitchen were $2.235 billion in 2003, an increase of 12% (4% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), from $1.994 billion in 2002. Sales of $25 million from a small acquisition in Europe completed in the first quarter of 2003 represented one percentage point of that gain. Sales in the Americas increased 4% (3% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), which came on top of 14% growth in 2002 (with little effect from foreign exchange translation) when sales were helped by the expansion of our jetted-tub program at Home Depot. Sales in 2003 benefited from our expanded faucet business and the continued success of our “total bathroom” concept in the retail channel, selling integrated suites of products. Examples of these are the Standard Collection at Home Depot, introduced in 2002, and the Sottini suites, introduced near the end of 2002 at Lowe’s, both of which continued to experience good sales growth. In the wholesale channel, sales of luxury faucets increased significantly for the year and contributed to margin expansion. The Champion toilet, with America’s Best™ Flushing System, established strong presence and achieved good distribution in the wholesale channel in the last half of 2003 at product margins that were better than the category average. Champion had a positive impact on sales and margins in both wholesale and retail channels in the U.S. In Europe, where our business is larger and our margin structure is better, sales increased 20% (4% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects). Approximately half of that increase came from a small acquisition we made in the first quarter of 2003, and half from volume increases in markets that we estimate were flat overall, year over year. We continued to reinforce our strong market positions across Europe. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we launched new suites, advertising and promotional campaigns in France, Italy, the U.K. and Eastern Europe. In Asia, sales increased 14% (11% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), off a small but growing base. The new residential market continues to be strong in China, and our sales significantly outgrew the market, driven by promotional activities surrounding our suites and the refurbishment of retail outlets. Sales in Korea and Thailand also increased strongly in 2003, resulting from successful new suite introductions.

     Segment income of Bath and Kitchen was $139.5 million for 2003, a decrease of 10% (18% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects) from $154.7 million for 2002. Operating margin was 6.2%, down from 7.8% in 2002. Segment income in 2003 included $20.8 million of expense for the elimination of 526 jobs in the Americas and Europe. Segment income and margins for 2003 benefited from volume increases and from fixing the operational issues that adversely affected our results in 2002. Those benefits were more than offset by continued investment in new products with better performance features, new suite introductions, and our “total bathroom” strategy, unfavorable pricing overall and an unfavorable sales mix of lower-margin fittings products. We continued to decrease costs and improve productivity through Materials Management and Six Sigma initiatives that offset cost escalations.

     BACKLOG–Backlog is not an important indicator of future business in the plumbing industry, which typically has a short cycle between customer order and shipment.

28

Vehicle Control Systems Segment

     Following is an analysis of changes in sales, segment income and operating margin from 2003 to 2004 showing the effect of foreign exchange translation.

     Vehicle Control Systems’ sales for 2004 were $1.724 billion, an increase of 27% (16% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), from $1.358 billion in 2003. The increase, exclusive of foreign exchange translation effects, was attributable primarily to increased bus and truck production, expanded content per vehicle, including new applications, continued globalization of our technology and strong growth in our aftermarket business. We had strong performance in truck and bus brake control systems, transmission control systems, and compressors. Sales in Europe, our largest market, increased 26% (14% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects) in 2004. Original equipment sales exceeded the European truck and bus market, which increased an estimated 17%. Sales increased 36% in North America, slightly outperforming a market that increased an estimated 34%. In Asia and Latin America, our sales also outperformed truck and bus markets in the year. Our sales continued to grow in line with or outpace the heavy vehicle manufacturing markets through sales of our new control systems, expanding penetration on other vehicle platforms, new applications with existing customers, and geographic expansion in Asia.

     Segment income in 2004 increased 31% (20% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects) to $231.3 million from $176.6 million in 2003. Segment operating margin was 13.4%, up from 13.0% in 2003. Segment income in 2004 included $5.4 million of operational consolidation expenses related to the transfer of production from a facility in Europe to a lower-cost facility and the associated elimination of 135 jobs. The improvements in segment income and margins, excluding the favorable effects of foreign exchange translation,

29

primarily reflected higher volume and savings from Materials Management and Six Sigma initiatives, which more than offset cost escalations and investments in new products and technologies. Additionally, we settled a warranty issue with one of our customers in the second quarter of 2004 that caused us to recognize an additional $14 million of warranty expense. Segment income in 2003 included $9.7 million of expense for the elimination of 110 jobs in Europe.

     Following is an analysis of changes in sales, segment income and operating margin from 2002 to 2003 showing the effect of foreign exchange translation.

     Vehicle Control Systems’ sales for 2003 were $1.358 billion, an increase of 28% (10% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects), from $1.057 billion in 2002. The increase was attributable primarily to increased content per vehicle, including new applications, and continued globalization of our technology. We had strong performance in truck and bus brake control systems and transmission control systems, and in air suspension systems for luxury cars and sport utility vehicles. Sales in Europe, our largest market increased 29% (6% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects) in 2003, outperforming the European truck and bus market, which increased 3%. Sales increased 18% in North America, outperforming a market that increased an estimated 1%. In Asia and Latin America, our sales also outperformed truck and bus markets in the year. Our sales continue to outperform the heavy vehicle manufacturing markets through sales of our new control systems, expanding penetration on other vehicle platforms, new applications with existing customers, and geographic expansion in Asia.

     Segment income in 2003 increased 27% (8% excluding favorable foreign exchange translation effects) to $176.6 million from $138.7 million in 2002. Segment operating margin was 13.0%, down from 13.1% in 2002. Segment income in 2003 included $9.7 million of expense for the elimination of 110 jobs in Europe. The improvements in segment income and margins primarily reflected volume leverage, savings from Materials Management and Six Sigma initiatives, and lower warranty costs incurred in 2003.

     BACKLOG–Vehicle Control Systems’ backlog as of December 31, 2004, was $823 million, an increase of 24% from December 31, 2003, excluding foreign exchange translation effects, primarily reflecting an increase in Europe related to market growth and expansion of business in Asia. Backlog is not necessarily predictive of future business as it relates only to some of our products. We expect markets in Europe to be up modestly in 2005.

Other Income Statement Data (as summarized in Item 6, Selected Financial Data)

     The $2.3 million increase in equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures for 2004 compared with 2003 primarily relates to improved earnings at the Company’s Air Conditioning compressor joint venture. The small decrease in equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures for 2003 compared with 2002 primarily reflects our decision to terminate our receivables discounting joint venture with TransAmerica in the third quarter of 2002; a decision which has resulted in lower interest costs. That decrease was partly offset by higher net income for both our Vehicle Control Systems’ joint venture in India from higher volume and our Air Conditioning compressor joint venture in the U.S. from higher volume and improved productivity.

30

     Interest expense decreased by $2.1 million in 2004 as compared to 2003, primarily driven by lower average debt balances, partially offset by higher interest rates and unfavorable foreign exchange translation effects. Interest expense decreased by $12.0 million in 2003 compared with 2002 primarily because of lower average debt balances. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 11 of Notes to Financial Statements.

     In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a $307 million ($188 million net of $119 million tax benefit or $.85 per diluted share) charge covering estimated net payments for pending and future asbestos-related claims. For a detailed description of the asbestos indemnity charge, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

     Corporate and other expenses as shown in the Segment and Income Statement Data table in Item 6, were $214.5 million for 2004, compared with $187.4 million for 2003. The increase in 2004 was primarily due to higher incentive compensation costs, increased provisions for various self-insured costs, post-retirement and medical costs, higher minority interest expense and foreign exchange losses related to short-term third party and intercompany debt. Corporate and other expenses were $187.4 million for 2003, compared with $168.9 million for 2002. The increase in 2003 was due principally to increased provisions for various self-insured costs, third-party-provided insurance, post-retirement and medical costs, and higher minority interest expense. The increase in post-retirement and medical costs includes higher accretion expense on retirement plans. The increase in accretion expense on retirement plans is attributable primarily to lower assumed discount rates and projected increases in future medical costs. See Notes 5 and 6 of Notes to Financial Statements for additional information on accretion expense and foreign exchange transactions. Those increases were partly offset by lower receivables discounting fees, reflecting our decision to terminate our receivables discounting joint venture with TransAmerica in the third quarter of 2002. Corporate and other expenses, shown in the Segment and Income Statement Data table in Item 6, primarily include some of the expenses classified as selling and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income on page 43. Corporate and other expenses also include certain items classified in “Other expense” in the Consolidated Statement of Income (see Note 5 of Notes to Financial Statements). Year-to-year changes in the significant components of “Other expense” are explained by the comments in this paragraph on corporate expenses, or in the first paragraph of this section on equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures.

     The income tax provisions for 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $49.5 million, $144.0 million and $185.2 million, respectively. The effective income tax rates were 13.6% of pre-tax income in 2004, 26.2% in 2003 and 33.3% in 2002. The income tax provision for 2004 included a $39.2 million tax benefit ($.18 per diluted share) from the following items: $18.5 million from the resolution of tax audits, $18 million related to a reduction in withholding tax liabilities arising from a decision to not distribute the earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and $2.7 million related to the benefit recognized on other tax items. The combined effect of the $39.2 million tax benefits that occurred in 2004, the $119 million tax benefit related to the asbestos indemnity charge, together with other ongoing tax planning activities, reduced the effective income tax rate to 13.6% for the year. Without the $39.2 million of tax benefits discussed above and the asbestos indemnity charge and the related tax benefit, the tax rate for 2004 would have been 31%. The effective tax rate in 2003 was 26.2%, principally from the resolution in the fourth quarter of 2003 of tax audit issues and approval of claims for research and development tax credits. Excluding these items, the tax rate in 2003 would have been 31%. The Company expects that its effective income tax rate in 2005 will be 30% excluding prior year adjustments such as tax audit settlements, etc. See Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements and Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates on page 36.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Net cash provided by operating activities was $764.7 million for 2004. This compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $651.2 million for 2003. Major factors contributing to the increase in 2004 were higher net income (excluding the non-cash asbestos indemnity charge in the fourth quarter of 2004), higher accounts payable balances primarily due to higher volume and the timing of payments related to capital expenditures, and proceeds from an insurance settlement in the third quarter, partially offset by higher tax payments and higher inventory levels.

     In investing activities, the Company made capital expenditures of $264 million for 2004, including $216 million on plant and equipment, $2 million of investments in affiliated companies, and $46 million in computer

31

software. This compared with capital expenditures of $241 million in 2003, including $171 million on plant and equipment, $25 million of investments in affiliated companies and other businesses, and $45 million in computer software. The Company also received $29 million from the sale of property, plant and equipment in 2004, compared with $23 million in 2003. The 2004 period also included a $16 million loan, net of payments, to the Company’s Air Conditioning compressor joint venture, which is unconsolidated.

     Most of the excess of cash provided by operating activities over cash used for investing activities in 2004 was used to fund financing activities totaling $404.6 million. This included net cash debt repayments of $204 million. Total Company debt reflected on the balance sheet was reduced by a net $171 million during 2004, as those cash repayments were partly offset by net non-cash increases of $33 million, including a $38 million foreign exchange translation effect. Other financing activities included payment of $253 million for the purchase of 7.0 million shares of common stock pursuant to the Company’s share repurchase program. Those were partly offset by proceeds realized from the exercise of stock options of $37 million and cash proceeds of $8 million from the settlement of foreign exchange forward contracts. The net effect of all operating, investing and financing activities for 2004 was an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $118 million. In 2003, financing activities totaled $420 million, including net debt repayments of $371 million and purchases of 5.9 million shares of the Company’s common stock for $150 million, offset primarily by proceeds realized from the exercise of stock options totaling $55 million.

     Over the past several years, the Company has reduced its debt outstanding from approximately $2.6 billion to $1.5 billion. The Company believes that its debt is at an appropriate level and in 2005 the Company intends to use its excess cash to provide a cash return to its investors. This cash return will be in the form of a quarterly dividend and share repurchases. The Company’s Board of Directors has approved a quarterly dividend of $.15 per share of common stock. The dividend will be paid on March 25, 2005, to shareholders of record on February 28, 2005. On February 3, 2005 the Company’s Board of Directors also approved an additional $400 million to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in the open market. As of February 11, 2005, the unexpended authorization on the current program, together with any amounts remaining under prior programs totaled $412,236,204. The Company plans to expend approximately $400 million for share repurchases in 2005.

     The Company has one primary bank credit agreement. That agreement provides the Company and certain subsidiaries (the “Borrowers”) with a senior, unsecured, five-year $1 billion multi-currency revolving credit facility that expires in November 2006. The Company also has a Euro-denominated, 364-day bank credit agreement of $55 million (at December 31, 2004 exchange rates) that expires on October 31, 2005, and that was not utilized as of December 31, 2004. Debt outstanding under that agreement was classified as long-term debt in the balance sheet as of December 31, 2003, because the Company had the ability and the intent to renew it or to refinance it with borrowings under the five-year facility. In addition, the Company has other lines of credit for $325 million.

     The aggregate borrowings of up to $1 billion provided by the primary bank credit facility can be used for general corporate purposes, of which up to $250 million may be used for issuing letters of credit and up to $125 million for same-day, short-term borrowings. Each loan outstanding under these facilities is due at the end of each interest period (a maximum of 12 months). The Company can, however, concurrently re-borrow equivalent amounts subject to compliance with certain conditions contained in the agreement.

     The Company, American Standard Inc., American Standard International Inc. and certain of their domestic subsidiaries guarantee obligations under the primary credit agreement. In addition, certain foreign subsidiaries guarantee obligations of certain foreign subsidiaries that borrow under that credit agreement.

     The primary bank credit agreement contains various covenants that limit, among other things, priority indebtedness, liens, sale and leaseback transactions, subsidiary indebtedness, certain fundamental business changes and the making of certain investments, loans and advances. The covenants also require the Company to meet certain financial tests: ratio of consolidated debt to EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), and consolidated free cash flow to interest expense. The Company is currently in compliance with the covenants contained in the credit agreement. See Note 11 of Notes to Financial Statements.

32

     At December 31, 2004, the Company’s total indebtedness was $1.508 billion. Annual scheduled debt maturities were $211 million, $370 million, $1 million, $306 million and $213 million for the years 2005 through 2009, respectively and $306 million thereafter. The Company plans to repay the $208 million of 7 3/8% Senior Notes maturing on April 15, 2005 with borrowings from its bank credit agreements or under its 1998 Shelf Registration Statement (as described below) and therefore this amount has been classified as long-term on the balance sheet. The Company had remaining availability under its primary bank credit agreement at December 31, 2004, of $863 million after reduction for borrowings of $35 million and $102 million of outstanding letters of credit. The Company has $11 million available under other bank credit facilities after reduction for borrowings of $77 million and letters of credit usage of $12 million. In addition, the Company had $225 million available at December 31, 2004, under overdraft facilities that can be withdrawn by the banks at any time and outstanding letters of credit issued by other banks of $56 million as of December 31, 2004. See Note 11 of Notes to Financial Statements.

     The Company’s improved cash flows, the reduction in total debt outstanding and an improved credit rating have made alternative sources of financing more readily available to the Company. The Company believes that the amounts available from operating cash flows, funds available under its credit agreements and future borrowings under the remaining $540 million of a $1 billion shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in 1998 (the “1998 Shelf Registration”) and access to public and private debt markets will be sufficient to meet its expected operating needs and planned capital expenditures for the foreseeable future.

     The Company redeemed its 7 1/8% Senior Notes on their due date, February 15, 2003, for $129.5 million, including accrued interest with borrowings under its five-year bank credit facility.

     In January 2003, a European subsidiary of the Company issued €30 million ($41 million at December 31, 2004 exchange rates) of 7.59% Guaranteed Senior Bonds due 2013 in a private placement as part of certain changes in the financial structure and organization of its European subsidiaries. The proceeds were used to repay borrowings under bank credit agreements. The bonds are guaranteed by the Company.

     Debt securities (Senior Notes) sold under the 1998 Shelf Registration are issued by American Standard Inc. and unconditionally guaranteed by American Standard Companies Inc. and ASII. These Senior Notes cannot be redeemed prior to their maturity date. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from any future sales of such debt securities under the 1998 Shelf Registration for general corporate purposes, which may include refinancing existing debt as it matures, certain investments, acquisitions, additions to working capital or capital expenditures.

     Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     The Company employs several means to manage its liquidity and is not dependent upon any one source of funding. In addition to funds available from operating cash flows, bank credit agreements and the public debt and equity markets as described above, the Company uses two principal off-balance-sheet techniques: operating leases and receivables financing arrangements. Operating leases are employed as an alternative to purchasing certain property, plant and equipment. Receivables financing arrangements are used to reduce borrowing costs. Future rental commitments under all non-cancelable operating leases in effect at December 31, 2004, total $562 million. That total represents the equivalent of approximately $467 million of off-balance-sheet debt, discounted at an assumed rate of 6.0%. See the following table of Aggregate Contractual Obligations for a summary of amounts due under operating leases.

     To reduce its borrowing cost, during 2002 the Company established new accounts receivable financing facilities in Europe and the U.S., and terminated a previously existing arrangement in the U.S. See Note 8 of Notes to Financial Statements. As part of these facilities, the Company formed wholly-owned, special-purpose entities (the “SPEs”) for the sole purpose of buying and selling receivables generated by the Company. Under these facilities, the Company, irrevocably and without recourse, transfers all eligible accounts receivable to the SPEs, which in turn, sell them, or undivided ownership interests in them, to conduits administered by banks. The assets of the SPEs are not

33

available to pay the claims of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Company retains a subordinated interest in the receivables sold of approximately 11% in Europe and approximately 46% in the U.S. The conduits obtain the funds to purchase the receivables, other than the retained interest, by selling commercial paper to third-party investors. Advances from the conduits to the SPEs are limited to approximately $550 million (€275 million, or approximately $375 million at December 31, 2004 exchange rates, under the European facility, and $175 million under the U.S. facility). At December 31, 2004 advances from conduits were $369 million and $135 million under the European and U.S. facilities, respectively. The Company retains responsibilities for the collection and administration of receivables subject to these facilities. These facilities are for three years, subject to annual renewals and for the European facility, the maintenance of specified debt-rating levels, and for the U.S. facility, the maintenance of certain financial covenants. The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants. The receivables sold are removed from the balance sheet since they meet the applicable criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The Company’s retained interest is recorded at fair value in other current assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. To the extent that the cash received and value of the retained interest is less than the net book value of the receivables sold, losses are recognized at the time of sale. Those losses amounted to $40.2 million for 2004 and $41.7 million for 2003 and are included in other expense on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The accounts receivable financing facility in Europe expires in May 2005 and the U.S. facility expires in September 2005. The Company has the ability to renew these facilities and intends to renew them upon their expiration.

     The Company has commitments and performance guarantees, including energy savings guarantees totaling $55 million extending from 2005 to 2022, under long-term service and maintenance contracts related to its air conditioning equipment and system controls. Through 2004 the Company has only experienced one insignificant loss under such arrangements and considers the probability of any significant future losses to be unlikely. The Company also guarantees debt of third parties in the amount of $3 million as of December 31, 2004.

     Following is a summary of contractual obligations, both on and off the balance sheet as of December 31, 2004.

Aggregate Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2004
(Millions of dollars)

Notes to table

34

Capital Expenditures

     The Company’s capital expenditures for 2004 were $264 million (including $216 million on plant and equipment, $2 million of investments in affiliated companies and other businesses, and $46 million on computer software), compared with $241 million for 2003 (including $171 million on plant and equipment, $25 million of investments in affiliated companies and other businesses, and $45 million on computer software). Capital spending on plant and equipment in 2004 was devoted primarily to equipment for the manufacture of new products and productivity improvements.

     Capital expenditures for Air Conditioning Systems and Services for 2004 were $112 million (including $97 million on plant and equipment, $1 million of investments in affiliated companies and $14 million for computer software), an increase of 24% from 2003 expenditures of $90 million (including $16 million for computer software). Major expenditures in 2004 primarily related to projects for new products, product improvements and improvements related to productivity.

     Bath and Kitchen’s capital expenditures for 2004 were $77 million (including $58 million on plant and equipment, $1 million of investments in affiliated companies and $18 million on computer software), essentially flat with 2003 capital expenditures of $76 million (including $18 million for computer software). Bath and Kitchen also expended $25 million in 2003 on several small acquisitions and investments in affiliated companies. Major expenditures on plant and equipment in 2004 included projects related to productivity (process improvements), new products and product improvements.

     Capital expenditures for Vehicle Control Systems in 2004 were $69 million (including $58 million on plant and equipment and $11 million for computer software) an increase of 53% from expenditures of $45 million in 2003 (including $8 million for computer software). Expenditures on plant and equipment in 2004 were primarily related to capital equipment for new products, cost reduction and capacity expansion.

     Corporate headquarters incurred minor amounts of spending on leasehold improvements and computer software in each of the last two years.

     The Company believes capital spending in recent years has been sufficient to maintain efficient production capacity, to implement important product and process redesigns, to expand capacity to meet increased demand and to make strategic investments and acquisitions. Six Sigma projects have freed up capacity in our manufacturing facilities and are expected to continue to do so. The Company expects to continue investing to expand and modernize its existing facilities and invest in its facilities to create capacity for new product development. The Company expects to make capital expenditures on plant and equipment in 2005 of approximately $300 million, excluding potential acquisitions and computer software.

35

Effect of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

     The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has recently issued several new Statements and Interpretations. For the disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation–Transition and Disclosure, see Note 12 of Notes to Financial Statements. For the interim period disclosures required by Statement No. 132 (revised 2003) Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, see Note 6 of Notes to Financial Statements. Some of the disclosure requirements of the revised Statement No. 132 related to foreign plans and certain other matters are not effective until 2005. For a discussion of the impact of FASB Staff Position No. 106-2, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, which addresses the accounting and disclosure required as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 enacted on December 8, 2003, see Note 6 of Notes to Financial Statements. Statement No. 151, Inventory Costs, an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, was issued in 2004. This statement will be effective for the Company in 2006. The Company is currently in the process of determining the impact. Other Statements and Interpretations recently issued by the FASB that are applicable to the Company have had no impact to the Company upon adoption. Those statements included No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities; and No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity; Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, parts of which became effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2004. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(revised 2004) (“FAS 123”), Share Based Payments, was issued on December 16, 2004. The new standard requires companies to recognize in their financial statements the cost of employee services received in exchange for valuable equity instruments issued. The Company plans to adopt FAS 123 in the third quarter of 2005 with retroactive adjustment for all prior periods presented using the pro-forma amounts disclosed in Note 2 Accounting Policies – Stock-based Compensation. The Company estimates that the impact of this compensation expense will amount to approximately $.08 - $.09 per diluted share in 2005.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with those accounting principles requires management to make judgments and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Those judgments and estimates have a significant effect on the financial statements because they result primarily from the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company frequently re-evaluates its judgments and estimates that are based upon historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

     The Company believes that of its significant accounting policies (see Note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements), the ones that may involve a higher degree of uncertainty, judgment and complexity are post-retirement benefits, warranties, income taxes and commitments and contingencies. Management has reviewed the following disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

     Post-retirement benefits–The Company has significant pension and post-retirement benefit costs and liabilities that are developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions including discount rates, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, merit and promotion increases and the health care cost trend rate. The Company is required to consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates and health care costs, in making its assumptions. Changes in the related pension and post-retirement benefit costs or liabilities may occur in the future due to changes in the assumptions. The assumptions as to the expected long-term rates of return on plan assets are based upon the composition of plan assets, historical long-term rates of return on similar assets and current and expected market conditions. Similarly, the discount rate used to calculate the present value of projected benefit obligations is based upon interest rates on the Moody’s AA Corporate Bond Index for U.S. plans and a long-term corporate bond interest rate for foreign plans. A decrease of one percentage point in the

36

assumed rate of return on plan assets and a decrease of one percentage point in the discount rate applied to projected benefit obligations would increase annual pension expense by approximately $30 million. An increase of one percentage point in the assumed health care cost trend rate in each future year would increase annual health insurance costs by approximately $1 million. See the disclosures about pension and post-retirement obligations, the composition of plan assets, assumptions and other matters in Note 6 of Notes to Financial Statements.

     Warranties–Products sold are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from one to ten years and for the lifetime of certain bath and kitchen faucets. At the time of sale the Company accrues a warranty reserve for estimated costs to provide equipment, parts or services to satisfy warranty obligations. The Company’s estimate of costs to service its warranty obligations is based on historical experience and expectations of future conditions. To the extent the Company experiences changes in warranty claim activity or costs associated with servicing those claims, its warranty accrual is adjusted accordingly. The Company also sells extended warranty contracts for up to 10 years on some of its products. Revenues from the sales of extended warranties are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the contracts or based upon historical experience. Costs to satisfy obligations under extended warranty contracts are charged to cost of sales as incurred. Warranty accrual estimates made in prior years can change significantly, and sometimes unexpectedly, based upon the most current warranty claims information available. Such changes in estimates increased warranty expense by a net $3 million in 2004, $8 million in 2003, and $6 million in 2002. See Note 14 of Notes to Financial Statements for a three-year summary of warranty costs.

     Income taxes–The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that it believes is more likely than not to be realized. While the Company has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event the Company were to determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to decrease the net deferred tax assets would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to increase the net deferred tax assets would increase income in the period such determination was made. Deferred tax assets have been reduced by a valuation allowance of $175 million. A decrease in that valuation allowance of 10% would increase net income by approximately $17.5 million. The Company also estimates its effective income tax rate periodically, considering all known factors and the estimated effects of future events or tax planning strategies that can cause that rate to vary from the statutory rate. Estimating the outcome of future events is inherently uncertain and final resolution of those events can cause the effective rate to vary significantly. For example, in the second quarter of 2004, the Company recognized a $2.7 million tax benefit related to certain tax items; in the third quarter of 2004, the Company recognized an $18 million tax benefit related to a reduction in withholding tax liabilities; in the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company resolved certain tax audit issues and recorded an $18 million tax benefit; and recorded a $119 million tax benefit related to the asbestos indemnity charge.

     Commitments and Contingencies–The Company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, asbestos, labor, product and other matters. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of liability to be recorded, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue. The liability recorded may change in the future, possibly by significant amounts, due to new developments in any of the matters.

     Over the years, the Company has been named as a defendant in numerous lawsuits alleging various asbestos-related personal injury claims arising primarily from sales of boilers and railroad brake shoes. In these asbestos-related lawsuits, the Company is usually named as one of a large group of defendants, often in excess of one hundred companies. Many of these lawsuits involve multiple claimants, do not specifically identify the injury or disease for which damages are sought and/or do not allege a connection between any Company product and a claimed injury or disease. As a result, numerous lawsuits have been placed and may remain on inactive or deferred dockets, which some jurisdictions have established.

37

     Historically, the Company recorded a liability only for filed asbestos claims. Costs associated with claims that might be filed against the Company in the future were not recorded because the Company did not believe its history and experience with asbestos-related litigation was sufficient to allow it to make a reasonable estimate of this liability. Because of stabilization in the rate at which new claims are being filed and the Company’s added experience in resolving claims, the Company now believes a reasonable estimate of this liability can be made and accordingly has recorded this liability and an increase in the associated receivable for probable asbestos-related recoveries as of December 31, 2004. Key assumptions in determining the Company’s asbestos liability and associated receivable include the amount of insurance available, gaps in coverage, applicable deductibles, allocation methodologies, solvency ratings and credit-worthiness of the insurers, the published dividend rates of insolvent insurers, amounts already recovered from and the potential for settlements with insurers, and estimated annual legal fees.

     For additional disclosures on asbestos and other contingent liabilities see Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Cyclical and Seasonal Nature of Business

               Approximately 60% of Air Conditioning Systems and Services and Bath and Kitchen sales on a combined basis are to the replacement, remodeling and repair markets that tend to be less cyclical than other markets. The Company’s geographic diversity mitigates the effects of fluctuations in individual new construction markets. Vehicle Control Systems’ sales are dependent to a large extent on production levels of medium-sized and heavy trucks and buses, particularly in Europe and the U.S., which have been cyclical. Vehicle Control Systems has generally outperformed the medium-sized and heavy vehicle markets, primarily from increased content per vehicle and improved market penetration.

     Total Company sales and related segment income tend to be seasonally higher in the second and third quarters of the year because, in the U.S. and other Northern Hemisphere markets, summer is the peak season for sales of Air Conditioning Systems and Services. In addition, a significant percentage of Air Conditioning Systems and Services’ sales are related to U.S. residential and commercial construction activity, which is generally higher in the second and third quarters of the year.

Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

     Certain of the statements contained in this report (other than the historical financial data and other statements of historical fact), including, without limitation, statements as to management’s expectations and beliefs, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s good faith expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect upon the Company. There can be no assurance that future developments will be in accordance with such expectations or that the effect of future developments on the Company will be those anticipated by management. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “plans,” “strategy,” “prospects,” “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “intends” and other words of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. This Report on Form 10-K includes important information as to risk factors in the sections titled “Business”, “Legal Proceedings” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Many important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s expectations, including:

38

39

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

     The Company is exposed to fluctuations in the price of major raw material commodities used in the manufacturing process, foreign currency fluctuations and interest rate changes. From time to time the Company enters into hedge agreements to reduce its risks related to commodity price, foreign currency and interest rates. Such agreements hedge only specific transactions or commitments. To minimize the risk of counter-party nonperformance, such agreements are made only through major financial institutions with significant experience in such financial instruments.

     To minimize the risk of fluctuations in the market price of major raw material commodities, such as copper and aluminum used in the manufacturing process, the Company may enter commodity-forward contracts to effectively fix the cost of the commodity. Maturity dates of the contracts are scheduled to coincide with market purchases of the commodity. Cash proceeds or payments between the Company and the counter-party at maturity of the contracts are recognized as an adjustment to the cost of the commodity purchased, to the extent the hedge is effective. Charges or credits resulting from ineffective hedges are recognized in income immediately. The Company generally does not enter commodity hedges extending beyond eighteen months. The notional value of commodity-forward contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $95 million and $57 million, respectively. A 10% change in the price of commodities hedged would change the fair value of the hedge contracts by approximately $11 million as of December 31, 2004 and $7 million as of December 31, 2003.

     The Company conducts operations through subsidiaries in most of the major countries of Western Europe, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Poland, Central American countries, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan and Egypt. In addition, the Company conducts business in some of these countries through affiliated companies and partnerships in which the Company owns 50% or less of the stock or partnership interest. Because the Company has manufacturing operations in 28 countries, fluctuations in currency exchange rates may have a significant impact on its financial statements. Such fluctuations have much less effect on local operating results, however, because the Company to a significant extent sells its products within the countries in which they are manufactured. However, a significant and growing portion of the Company’s products are manufactured in lower-cost locations and sold in various countries, resulting in increased exposure to foreign exchange effects. The asset exposure of foreign operations to the effects of exchange volatility has also been partly mitigated by the denomination in foreign currencies of a portion of the Company’s borrowings. The Company is also subject to political risks in its foreign operations.

     To manage the balance between floating interest rate debt and fixed interest rate debt, the Company has entered into interest rate swaps that effectively convert fixed-rate debt to variable-rate debt. The maturity date of these swap contracts coincides with the maturity date of the underlying debt. Under these swaps, the Company pays a specified variable interest rate and receives the fixed rate applicable to the underlying debt. The interest rate swaps are designated as fair-value hedges of the underlying debt. The fair value of the hedges is recorded in other long-term assets or liabilities with a corresponding increase or decrease in the debt obligation. The change in fair values of the hedge instrument and the debt are recorded as equal and offsetting unrealized gains and losses. The existing fair value hedges are 100% effective and therefore there is no effect on current earnings from hedge ineffectiveness. The notional value (the value of the underlying debt) of interest rate swaps outstanding as of December 31, 2004, was $300 million. Including that $300 million, as of December 31, 2004, approximately $406 million of the Company’s $1.5 billion total debt bore interest at variable rates based upon the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). A 10% change in swap rates would change the fair value of the interest rate swaps by approximately $3 million as of December 31, 2004.

     To convert Pounds Sterling financing under the European receivables securitization program to U.S. dollar equivalent financing, the Company enters into currency-forward contracts that effectively fix the transaction costs in U.S. dollars. These forward contracts are defined as speculative hedges and accordingly, changes in the market

40

value of the contracts are recorded in other income/expense as incurred, with a corresponding increase or decrease in other assets. The recorded gains or losses are essentially offset by gains or losses on the Company’s Sterling-denominated debt. Use of similar currency-forward contracts on Euro financing of receivables was discontinued in the third quarter of 2003.

     The Company has commitments and performance guarantees, including energy savings guarantees totaling $55 million as of December 31, 2004, extending from 2005 to 2022, under long-term contracts related to its air conditioning equipment and system controls. Through 2004 the Company has only experienced one insignificant loss under such arrangements and considers the probability of any significant future losses to be unlikely.

41

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of American Standard Companies Inc.

     We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of American Standard Companies Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity, and consolidated statement of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of American Standard Companies Inc. at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

     We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of American Standard Companies Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

New York, New York
February 23, 2005

42

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
AMERICAN STANDARD COMPANIES INC.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

43

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AMERICAN STANDARD COMPANIES INC.