ATC 10-Q 07-25-06

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

OR
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

 
For the transition period from______________________ to ______________________

Commission File Number 0-21803
 

AFTERMARKET TECHNOLOGY CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 

Delaware
95-4486486
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1400 Opus Place - Suite 600, Downers Grove, IL
60515
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)

 
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (630) 271-8100

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes xNo o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer x    Non-accelerated filer o  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o Nox

As of July 21, 2006, there were 22,104,530 shares of common stock of the Registrant outstanding.
 

AFTERMARKET TECHNOLOGY CORP.

FORM 10-Q

Table of Contents

PART I.
Financial Information
   
Item 1.
Financial Statements:
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
   
   
   
   
PART II.
Other Information
   
   
   
   


i

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
   
   
June 30,
  
December 31,
   
2006
  
2005
   
(Unaudited)
    
Assets
          
Current Assets:
              
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
5,610
  
$
45,472
  
Accounts receivable, net
    
78,504
   
71,881
 
Inventories
    
58,356
   
50,058
 
Prepaid and other assets
    
3,689
   
4,396
 
Refundable income taxes
    
1,490
   
689
 
Deferred income taxes
    
12,372
   
11,446
 
Assets of discontinued operations
    
5,982
   
18,562
 
Total current assets
    
166,003
   
202,504
 
               
Property, plant and equipment, net
    
51,995
   
54,153
 
Debt issuance costs, net
    
743
   
1,981
 
Goodwill
    
146,653
   
146,176
 
Intangible assets, net
    
579
   
292
 
Other assets
    
1,625
   
427
 
Assets of discontinued operations
    
-
   
2,247
 
Total assets
  
$
367,598
  
$
407,780
  
               
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
              
Current Liabilities:
              
Accounts payable
  
$
36,377
  
$
41,294
  
Accrued expenses
    
18,098
   
23,130
 
Credit facility
    
-
   
10,062
 
Amounts due to sellers of acquired companies
    
76
   
94
 
Deferred compensation
    
136
   
136
 
Liabilities of discontinued operations
    
3,546
   
4,757
 
Total current liabilities
    
58,233
   
79,473
 
               
Amount drawn on credit facility, less current portion
    
49,200
   
80,623
 
Deferred compensation, less current portion
    
2,062
   
847
 
Other long-term liabilities
    
2,074
   
2,200
 
Deferred income taxes
    
24,851
   
23,407
 
               
Stockholders' Equity:
              
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; shares authorized - 2,000,000; none issued
    
-
   
-
 
Common stock, $.01 par value; shares authorized - 30,000,000;
              
Issued (including shares held in treasury) - 27,096,220 and 26,539,926
             
as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively
    
271
   
265
 
Additional paid-in capital
    
221,484
   
212,678
 
Retained earnings
   
81,454
   
77,890
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    
2,271
   
1,186
 
Unearned compensation
    
-
   
(1,160
)
Common stock held in treasury, at cost - 4,991,690 and 4,774,374 shares
              
as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively
    
(74,302
)
  
(69,629
)
Total stockholders' equity
    
231,178
   
221,230
 
               
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
  
$
367,598
  
$
407,780
  
               
See accompanying notes.
              

1

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
                   
   
For the three months ended June 30,
  
For the six months ended June 30,
   
2006
  
2005
  
2006
  
2005
   
(Unaudited)
  
(Unaudited)
                           
Net sales:
                          
Products
  
$
55,864
  
$
65,301
  
$
113,571
  
$
122,025
  
Services
    
66,157
   
33,793
   
127,856
   
64,990
 
Total net sales
    
122,021
   
99,094
   
241,427
   
187,015
 
                           
Cost of sales:
                          
Products
    
43,739
   
48,697
   
89,297
   
91,667
 
Services
    
51,836
   
25,431
   
101,445
   
48,649
 
Total cost of sales
    
95,575
   
74,128
   
190,742
   
140,316
 
                           
Gross profit
    
26,446
   
24,966
   
50,685
   
46,699
 
                           
Selling, general and administrative expense
    
13,659
   
12,018
   
26,234
   
23,485
 
Amortization of intangible assets
    
30
   
32
   
61
   
63
 
Exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges
   
581
   
348
   
687
   
434
 
                           
Operating income
   
12,176
   
12,568
   
23,703
   
22,717
 
                           
Interest income
    
43
   
408
   
468
   
1,210
 
Other income (expense), net
    
(98
)
  
624
   
(71
)
  
600
 
Equity in income of investee
    
-
   
20
   
-
   
-
 
Write-off of debt issuance costs
    
-
   
-
   
(1,691
)
  
-
 
Interest expense
    
(919
)
  
(1,920
)
  
(2,757
)
  
(3,871
)
                           
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    
11,202
   
11,700
   
19,652
   
20,656
 
                           
Income tax expense
    
4,390
   
4,270
   
7,111
   
7,539
 
                           
Income from continuing operations
    
6,812
   
7,430
   
12,541
   
13,117
 
                           
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations,
                         
net of income taxes
    
(48
)
  
24
   
(8,977
)
  
(313
)
                           
Net income
  
$
6,764
  
$
7,454
  
$
3,564
  
$
12,804
  
                           
                           
Per common share - basic:
                          
Income from continuing operations
  
$
0.31
  
$
0.35
  
$
0.58
  
$
0.62
  
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
(0.41
)
$
(0.01
)
Net income
 
$
0.31
  
$
0.35
  
$
0.16
  
$
0.60
  
                           
Weighted average number of common shares
                          
outstanding
    
21,780
   
21,255
   
21,722
   
21,213
 
                           
Per common share - diluted:
                          
Income from continuing operations
  
$
0.31
  
$
0.35
  
$
0.57
  
$
0.61
  
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
(0.41
)
$
(0.01
)
Net income
 
$
0.31
  
$
0.35
  
$
0.16
  
$
0.60
  
                           
Weighted average number of common and
                          
common equivalent shares outstanding
    
22,024
   
21,436
   
21,989
   
21,414
 
                           
See accompanying notes.
                          

2

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
           
   
For the six months ended June 30,
   
2006
  
2005
   
(Unaudited)
Operating Activities:
              
Net income
 
$
3,564
  
$
12,804
  
               
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
              
operating activities - continuing operations:
              
Net loss from discontinued operations
    
8,977
   
313
 
Write-off of debt issuance costs
    
1,691
   
-
 
Depreciation and amortization
    
6,646
   
6,544
 
Noncash stock-based compensation
    
1,118
   
447
 
Amortization of debt issuance costs
    
333
   
661
 
Adjustments to provision for losses on accounts receivable
    
96
   
128
 
Loss on sale of equipment
    
185
   
3
 
Deferred income taxes
    
495
   
6,165
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
              
net of businesses acquired or discontinued/sold:
              
Accounts receivable
    
(6,223
)
  
(12,856
)
Inventories
    
(6,884
)
  
4,300
 
Prepaid and other assets
    
(84
)
  
2,152
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    
(9,080
)
  
(9,575
)
Net cash provided by operating activities - continuing operations
    
834
   
11,086
 
               
Net cash provided by operating activities - discontinued operations
    
4,279
   
811
 
               
Investing Activities:
              
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
    
(4,143
)
  
(10,830
)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
    
(2,911
)
  
-
 
Purchase of assets of a business
    
(1,746
)
  
-
 
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities
    
1,741
   
-
 
Proceeds from redemption of note receivable from sale of business
    
-
   
8,365
 
Proceeds from sale of equipment
    
24
   
-
 
Net cash used in investing activities - continuing operations
    
(7,035
)
  
(2,465
)
               
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities - discontinued operations
    
110
   
(15
)
               
Financing Activities:
              
Payments on term debt     
    
(90,685
)
  
(15,834
)
Borrowings on revolving credit facility, net
    49,200     -  
Payment of debt issuance costs
    
(786
)
  
-
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    
7,363
   
1,173
 
Tax benefit from stock-based award transactions
    
1,492
   
-
 
Payments on amounts due to sellers of acquired companies
    
(25
)
  
(2,425
)
Repurchases of common stock for treasury
    
(4,673
)
  
(280
)
Net cash used in financing activities
    
(38,114
)
  
(17,366
)
               
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    
64
   
(32
)
               
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    
(39,862
)
  
(7,981
)
               
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    
45,472
   
18,085
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  
$
5,610
  
$
10,104
  
               
Cash paid during the period for:
              
Interest
  
$
2,944
  
$
3,348
  
Income taxes, net
    
1,456
   
1,116
 
               
See accompanying notes.
              

3

AFTERMARKET TECHNOLOGY CORP.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


Note 1.
Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Aftermarket Technology Corp. (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2006 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company discontinued its Independent Aftermarket businesses. These businesses were reported as “Other” in segment information previously disclosed. The results of these businesses are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements. As a result of the discontinuance of the Independent Aftermarket businesses, for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, revenues of $3,078 and $6,026, and an after-tax loss of $48 ($0.00 per common share - basic and diluted) and an after-tax gain of $24 ($0.00 per common share - basic and diluted), and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, revenues of $7,714 and $12,066, and after-tax losses of $8,977 ($0.41 per common share - basic and diluted) and $229 ($0.01 per common share - basic and diluted) were reported as discontinued operations. (See Note 12 - Discontinued Operations.)

Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation.


Note 2.
Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

 
June 30, 2006
  
December 31, 2005
           
Raw materials, including core inventories
$
47,989
  
$
42,742
Work-in-process
  
1,756
    
1,538
Finished goods
  
8,611
    
5,778
 
$
58,356
  
$
50,058


4

Note 3.
Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment, stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, is summarized as follows:

 
June 30, 2006
  
December 31, 2005
             
Property, plant and equipment
$
127,903
  
$
124,697
  
Accumulated depreciation
  
(75,908
)
  
(70,544
)
 
$
51,995
  
$
54,153
  


Note 4.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment is summarized as follows:
 
 
  
Drivetrain  
    
Logistics
    
Other/Unallocated
    
Consolidated
Balance at December 31, 2005
$
127,068
  
$
18,973
  
$
135
  
$
146,176
Effect of exchange rate changes from the translation of U.K. subsidiary
  
477
    
−
    
−
    
477
Balance at June 30, 2006
$
127,545
  
$
18,973
  
$
135
  
$
146,653

The Company’s intangible assets, primarily consisting of non-compete agreements being amortized over their estimated useful lives are summarized as follows:

 
June 30, 2006
  
December 31, 2005
             
Intangible assets
$
1,615
  
$
1,261
  
Less: Accumulated amortization 
  
(1,036
)
  
(969
)
 
$
579
  
$
292
  

During June 2006, the Company purchased assets valued at $1,746 from one of its suppliers, acquiring a business which the Company had previously outsourced to this supplier. As part of the asset purchase agreement, the Company received from the supplier a three year non-compete agreement valued at $348.

Estimated amortization expense for the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:

 
Estimated Amortization Expense
     
2006 (remainder)
$
124
2007
  
241
2008
  
138
2009
  
55
2010
  
1

5

Note 5.
Warranty Liability

The Company offers various product warranties for transmissions and engines sold to its customers in the Drivetrain segment. The specific terms and conditions of the warranties vary depending upon the customer and the product sold. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include number of products sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims and cost per claim. The Company accrues for estimated warranty costs as sales are made and periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability, included in accrued expenses, and adjusts the amount as necessary.

Changes to the Company’s warranty liability during the six months ended June 30, 2006 are summarized as follows:
     
Balance at December 31, 2005
$
2,499
  
Warranties issued
  
625
  
Claims paid/settlements
  
(449
)
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties
  
(292
)
Balance at June 30, 2006
$
2,383
   
 
 
Note 6.
Credit Facilities
 
On March 21, 2006, the Company repaid the $85,985 balance outstanding under its 2002 credit facility and terminated the related credit and security agreements.  As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $1,691 to write off deferred debt issuance costs associated with the early termination of the facility.

On March 21, 2006, the Company entered into a new credit agreement and a related security agreement with certain banks (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility provides the Company with a $150,000 five-year senior secured revolving credit facility. The Credit Facility can be increased by up to $75,000 under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions (including the receipt from one or more lenders of the additional commitment). The Company used $57,000 of borrowings under the Credit Facility plus available cash on hand to repay the balance under its old credit facility.

Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility generally bear interest at LIBOR plus a specified margin or the prime rate plus a specified margin, depending on the type of borrowing being made. The applicable margin is based on the Company’s ratio of debt to EBITDA from time to time.  Currently, the Company’s LIBOR margin is 1.0% and its prime rate margin is zero.

Amounts advanced under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries and secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets and its domestic subsidiaries' assets. The Credit Facility contains several covenants, including ones that require the Company to maintain specified levels of net worth, leverage and interest coverage and others that may limit its ability to create liens, make investments, incur indebtedness, make fundamental changes, make asset dispositions, make restricted payments (including dividends) and engage in transactions with the Company’s affiliates and affiliates of its subsidiaries. The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants at June 30, 2006.

Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility are generally due and payable on the March 31, 2011 expiration date of the credit agreement. The Company can elect to prepay some or all of the outstanding balance from time to time without penalty.

6

At June 30, 2006, $49,200 was outstanding under the Credit Facility and the Company had $2,015 of letters of credit issued against the Credit Facility.


Note 7.
Comprehensive Income 

The following table sets forth the computation of comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively:

 
For the three months ended June 30,
  
For the six months ended June 30,
   
2006
    
2005
    
2006
    
2005
Net income
$
6,764
  
$
7,454
  
$
3,564
  
$
12,804
  
Other comprehensive income (loss):
                        
Currency translation adjustments
  
856
    
(851
)
  
1,075
    
(1,401
)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of income taxes
  
(34
)
  
−
    
10
    
−
  
 
$
7,586
  
$
6,603
  
$
4,649
  
$
11,403
  


Note 8.
Repurchases of Common Stock

On February 16, 2006, the Company announced its intention to commence a program for the repurchase of up to 2% of its outstanding common stock during the balance of 2006. The Company plans to repurchase shares, from time to time, to offset the potential dilutive impact of stock option exercises and restricted stock grants under our stock incentive plans. As part of this program, the Company purchased 200,169 shares of its common stock at an aggregate cost of $4,333 during 2006.
 
Also during 2006, certain officers and employees of the Company delivered to the Company 13,980 shares of the Company’s common stock in payment of $340 of withholding tax obligations arising from the vesting of restricted stock awards. Per the stock incentive plan under which the stock awards were granted, (i) the withholding tax obligation was based upon the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the vesting date and (ii) the shares returned to the Company in satisfaction of the withholding tax obligation were returned to their respective plan and are available for future grant.

In May 2006, 3,167 shares of the Company’s common stock were returned to treasury at no cost, from the forfeiture of restricted stock awards.


Note 9.
Stock-Based Compensation

Stock Incentive Plans

The Company provides stock options and other incentive stock awards (“Stock Awards”) to employees, non-employee directors and independent contractors under its 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”), 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”), its 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”), its 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2000 Plan”), its 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1998 Plan”) and its 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, which expired on July 29, 2004, (the “1996 Plan”) (collectively the “Plans”), all of which have been approved by the Company’s shareholders. The 1996, 1998, 2000 and 2002 plans provide for granting of non-qualified and incentive stock option awards while the 2004 and 2006 plans

7

provide for the granting of non-qualified stock option awards but not incentive options. Stock options under the Plans are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant with vesting periods ranging from six months to five years, as determined by the Board of Directors or the Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors. Options under the Plans expire 10 years from the date of grant. For options exercised by participants of the Plans, the Company issues new shares of its common stock. The 2006, 2004, 2002, 2000 and 1998 plans authorize the issuance of 1,100,000, 1,000,000, 1,000,000, 750,000 and 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively. Shares available for grant under the Plans in the aggregate were 1,177,104 and 346,559 as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.


Accounting and Reporting for Stock-Based Awards

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company applied the intrinsic value method of accounting for the stock options granted to its employees and directors under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Accordingly, employee and director compensation expense was recognized only for those options whose exercise price was less than the market value of the Company’s common stock at the measurement date.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective transition method. Under the modified prospective method, (i) compensation expense for share-based awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 are recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation cost calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes under SFAS No. 123 and (ii) compensation expense for all share-based awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 are based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Results for periods prior to January 1, 2006 have not been restated.

For stock options granted by the Company with graded vesting provisions, the Company applies an accelerated attribution method and separately amortizes each vesting tranche over its particular vesting period.

As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006, the Company’s income from continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was lowered by $172 (net of income taxes of $102) and $319 (net of income taxes of $188), respectively. The Company classified the pre-tax stock options compensation cost of $274 and $507 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, as part of selling, general and administrative expense in its consolidated statements of income, respectively. The impact on both basic and diluted earnings per share for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.01 per share. In addition, prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company presented the tax benefit of stock option exercises as operating cash flows in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options are classified as financing cash inflows.


8

Pro Forma Information under SFAS No. 123

During June 2005, the Company granted 406,125 stock options to certain directors and employees at an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. These options became fully exercisable after a six month vesting period. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recognized $178, net of tax, of pro forma compensation expense related to this grant. Also during June 2005, the Company accelerated the vesting of 74,672 stock options whose exercise prices were above the Company’s closing stock price on the date the vesting of the options was accelerated. As a result, included in pro forma compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 is a charge of $376, net of tax, resulting from the accelerated vesting of such options. The accelerated vesting of these stock options was intended to eliminate a possible compensation expense associated with these options in future periods due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.

Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock-based award plans been determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123, and recognized as compensation expense on a ratable basis over the applicable vesting period, the Company’s reported income from continuing operations and earnings per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

 
  
For the three months ended June 30, 2005 
    
For the six
months ended
June 30, 2005
Income from continuing operations as reported
$
7,430
  
$
13,117
  
Stock-based employee compensation costs included in the determination of income from continuing operations as reported,
 net of income taxes
  
117
    
284
  
Stock-based employee compensation costs that would have been included in the determination of income from continuing operations if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards, net of income taxes
  
(924
)
  
(1,535
)
Pro forma income from continuing operations as if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards
$
6,623
  
$
11,866
  
             
Basic earnings per common share:
            
Income from continuing operations as reported
$
0.35
  
$
0.62
  
Pro forma as if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards
$
0.31
  
$
0.56
  
             
Diluted earnings per common share:
            
Income from continuing operations as reported
$
0.35
  
$
0.61
  
Pro forma as if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards
$
0.31
  
$
0.55
  


Stock Option Valuation Information

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model assuming no expected dividends. During 2006, the Company performed a review of past stock option exercise and forfeiture activity and identified two groups of optionees for purposes of applying the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The expected term of stock option awards granted is derived from historical exercise and forfeiture experience for each of the two groups of optionees and represents the period of time that stock options awards granted are expected to be outstanding for each optionee group. The expected term assumption incorporates the contractual term of an option grant

9

 as well as the vesting period of an award. The expected volatility assumption is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock over a term equal to the expected term of the option granted. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield on a U.S Treasury constant maturity with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option granted.

Following are the weighted-average assumptions used to calculate the fair value of stock options granted by the Company during the time periods indicated:

 
For the six months ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the years ended December 31,
   
2006
    
2005
    
2004
    
2003
Expected volatility
  
38.11
%
  
39.39
%
  
65.71
%
  
78.77
%
Risk-free interest rates
  
5.01
%
  
3.69
%
  
3.05
%
  
2.95
%
Expected lives
  
3.7 years
    
2.5 years
    
3.7 years
    
4.3 years
  


Stock Options
 
A summary of the Plans’ stock option activities during the six months ended June 30, 2006 is presented below:
 
 
Shares 
    
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
  
Weighted-
Average
Remaining Contractual
Term (in years)
 
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
1,798,139
  
$
18.43
          
Granted at market price
200,998
  
$
24.63
          
Exercised
(462,690
)
$
15.91
          
Forfeited
(8,000
)
$
14.89
          
Outstanding at June 30, 2006
1,528,447
  
$
20.03
  
7.3
  
$
9,168
                   
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2006
1,499,390
  
$
19.98
  
7.2
  
$
9,101
Exercisable at June 30, 2006
1,131,946
  
$
20.18
  
6.7
  
$
7,093

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on June 30, 2006 and the exercise price of each stock option, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options. This amount changes based upon the fair market value of the Company’s common stock. Total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $2,638 and $3,707, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was estimated at $8.67 per share.


10

The following summarizes information about options outstanding as of June 30, 2006:

 
Options Outstanding
 
Options Exercisable
Range of
Exercise
Prices
Shares
  
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
  
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Prices
  
Shares
  
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Prices
                           
 
$4.56 - $7.00
  
42,165
    
4.8 years
  
$
  5.01
    
42,165
  
$
  5.01
$7.01 - $12.00
  
97,499
    
5.8 years
  
$
10.08
    
86,166
  
$
10.09
$12.01 - $15.00
  
398,827
    
7.6 years
  
$
14.49
    
220,657
  
$
14.43
$15.01 - $20.00
  
292,958
    
8.2 years
  
$
16.55
    
286,958
  
$
16.49
$20.01 - $30.00
  
696,998
    
7.0 years
  
$
26.96
    
496,000
  
$
27.91
   
1,528,447
    
7.3 years
  
$
20.03
    
1,131,946
  
$
20.18

Restricted Stock

The Company also awards shares of its common stock to certain directors and employees in the form of unvested stock (“Restricted Stock”). These awards are recorded at the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance as unearned compensation and amortized ratably as expense over the applicable vesting period.

The following summarizes the status of the Restricted Stock as of June 30, 2006 and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2006:
  
 
Number of Shares 
    
Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair Value
Unvested balance at January 1, 2006
144,121
  
$
15.38
Granted
93,604
  
$
24.65
Vested
(52,791
)
$
15.44
Forfeited
(3,167
)
$
15.65
Unvested balance at June 30, 2006
181,767
  
$
20.13

As of June 30, 2006, there was $2,805 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to Restricted Stock granted under the Plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average period of 1.56 years. The total fair value of shares that vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $1,105 and $1,287, respectively.


Note 10.
Segment Information

Within the Company, financial performance is measured by lines of business. The Company aggregates certain of its operating units to form two reportable segments: the Drivetrain segment and the Logistics segment. The Drivetrain segment primarily sells remanufactured transmissions directly to Ford, Honda, DaimlerChrysler, Allison and certain foreign OEMs, primarily for use as replacement parts by their domestic dealers during the warranty and/or post-warranty periods following the sale of a vehicle. In addition, the Drivetrain segment sells select remanufactured engines primarily to certain European OEMs. The Company’s Logistics segment provides the following: (i) value-added warehouse, distribution and reverse logistics, test and repair, turnkey order fulfillment and information services for Cingular and, to a lesser extent, certain other customers in the wireless

11

electronics industry including Nokia, T-Mobile and LG; (ii) logistics and reverse logistics services and automotive electronic components remanufacturing, primarily for General Motors, Delphi, Visteon and Thales; and (iii) returned material reclamation and disposition services and core management services primarily for General Motors. The reportable segments are each managed and measured separately primarily due to the differing customers and distribution channels.

The Company evaluates performance based upon operating income. The reportable segments’ accounting policies are the same as those of the Company. The Company fully allocates (i) corporate overhead generally based upon budgeted full year profit before tax and (ii) internal information systems costs based upon usage estimates.

The following table summarizes financial information relating to the Company’s reportable segments:

 
Drivetrain
  
Logistics
  
Consolidated
For the three months ended June 30, 2006:
  
Net sales from external customers
$
55,864
  
$
66,157
  
$
122,021
Exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges
  
581
    
−
    
581
Operating income
  
4,584
    
7,592
    
12,176

For the three months ended June 30, 2005:
  
Net sales from external customers
$
65,301
  
$
33,793
  
$
99,094
Exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges
  
−
    
348
    
348
Operating income
  
9,280
    
3,288
    
12,568

For the six months ended June 30, 2006:
  
Net sales from external customers
$
113,571
  
$
127,856
  
$
241,427
Exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges
  
687
    
−
    
687
Operating income
  
10,117
    
13,586
    
23,703

For the six months ended June 30, 2005:
  
Net sales from external customers
$
122,025
  
$
64,990
  
$
187,015
Exit, disposal, certain severance and other (credits) charges
  
(20
)
  
454
    
434
Operating income
  
15,928
    
6,789
    
22,717


Note 11.
Exit, Disposal, Certain Severance and Other Charges

The Company has periodically incurred certain costs, primarily associated with restructuring and other initiatives that include consolidation of operations or facilities, management reorganization and cost-outs, rationalization of certain products, product lines and services and asset impairments. Examples of these costs include severance benefits for terminated employees, lease termination and other facility exit costs, moving and relocation costs, losses on impairments of fixed assets and write-down of inventories.

12

In 2003, the Company recorded compensation costs payable to its former CEO of $1,953, related to his conversion from full time to part time employment. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company paid the remaining amounts related to this obligation.

During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company incurred severance and related charges of $106 primarily related to cost reductions at its manufacturing facility in the United Kingdom.

During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company incurred severance and related charges of $581 primarily related to cost reduction initiatives at its Drivetrain segment manufacturing facilities in the United States.

Following is an analysis of the reserves relating to these activities: 
 
Termination Benefits
       
Reserve as of December 31, 2005
$
260
  
Provision
  
687
  
Payments
  
(857
)
Adjustment
  
3
  
Reserve as of June 30, 2006
$
93
  


During 2003, the Company completed a facilities consolidation activity within its Drivetrain segment. Following is an analysis of the remaining reserves related to this activity:

 
Exit / Other Costs
  
Loss on Write-Down of Assets
  
Total
                   
Reserve as of December 31, 2005
$
83
  
$
200
  
$
283
  
Payments
  
(18
)
   -    
(18
)
Asset write-offs
  
−
    
(200
)
  
(200
)
Adjustment
  
(3
)
  
−
    
(3
)
Reserve as of June 30, 2006
$
62
  
$
−
  
$
62
  
 
 
Note 12.
Discontinued Operations
 
The Company’s Independent Aftermarket businesses remanufactured engines and distributed non-OEM branded remanufactured engines and transmissions directly to independent transmission and general repair shops and certain aftermarket parts retailers. These businesses had incurred operating losses since their beginning. On February 15, 2006, the Company made the decision to exit its Independent Aftermarket transmission and engine businesses. The transmission business ceased operations during the three months ended March 31, 2006. The Company signed an agreement dated June 1, 2006 to sell the engine business (see Note 14 - Subsequent Event). These businesses were not reportable segments and were reported as “Other” in segment information previously disclosed. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $12,670 related to the exit from these businesses which included (i) $10,190 for the write-down of inventory to estimated net realizable value, (ii) $1,385 for the impairment of goodwill, (iii) $780 for the


13

write-down of property, plant and equipment and (iv) $315 for the write-down of accounts receivable. In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company adjusted its previous estimates and recorded (a) a gain of $287 related to the write-down of inventory, (b) a charge of $39 related to the write-down of accounts receivable and (c) $37 of severance costs.

Net sales for the Independent Aftermarket businesses were $3,078 and $6,026 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and $7,714 and $12,066 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of June 30, 2006, the current assets of discontinued operations included accounts receivable and inventory of $3,050 and $2,014, respectively. As of December 31, 2005, the current assets of discontinued operations included accounts receivable and inventory of $3,414 and $15,093, respectively.

During 2004, General Motors resourced its remanufactured transmission program from the Company’s facility located in Gastonia, North Carolina, and consequently, the Company closed this facility. Upon the closure of the facility in the fourth quarter of 2004, the operations of this operating unit within the Company’s Drivetrain segment were reclassified as discontinued operations.

In connection with the Gastonia facility closure, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $28,379 during the third quarter of 2004 and an additional charge of $394 during the fourth quarter of 2004. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company recorded an additional charge of $131 primarily related to workers compensation claims from this discontinued operation. In addition, at the end of 2004, the Company transferred property, plant and equipment with a book value estimate of $1,896 from its Gastonia facility to other Drivetrain segment facilities located in the United States. During the third quarter of 2005, the Company completed its review and assessment of the equipment transferred from its Gastonia facility and revised its impairment estimate made on December 31, 2004, resulting in an additional charge of $1,012 ($643 net of tax) classified as loss from discontinued operations.

Details of the gain (loss) from discontinued operations are as follows:

   
For the three months ended June 30,
  
For the six months ended June 30,
   
2006
  
2005
  
2006
  
2005
Exit from Independent Aftermarket
                          
Income (loss) from closure and pending disposition of businesses
  
$
211
  
$
−
  
$
(12,459
)
$
−
  
Operating income (loss)
    
(584
)
  
39
    
(1,040
)
  
(360
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
    
(373
)
  
39
    
(13,499
)
  
(360
)
Income tax benefit (expense)
    
325
    
(15
)
  
4,522
    
131
  
Income (loss) from Independent Aftermarket, net of income taxes
    
(48
)
  
24
    
(8,977
)
  
(229
)
                           
Disposal of Gastonia Operations:
                          
Loss before income taxes
    
−
    
−
    
−
    
(131
)
Income tax benefit
    
−
    
−
    
−
    
47
  
Loss from Gastonia operation, net of income taxes
    
−
    
−
    
−
    
(84
)
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
  
$
(48
)
$
24
  
$
(8,977
)
$
(313
)


14

Note 13.
Contingencies

The Company is subject to various evolving federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, emissions to air, discharge to waters and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of a variety of hazardous and non-hazardous substances and wastes. These laws and regulations provide for substantial fines and criminal sanctions for violations and impose liability for the costs of cleaning up, and damages resulting from, past spills, disposals or other releases of hazardous substances.

In connection with the acquisition of certain subsidiaries, some of which have been subsequently divested or relocated, the Company conducted certain investigations of these companies' facilities and their compliance with applicable environmental laws. The investigations, which included Phase I assessments by independent consultants of all manufacturing and various distribution facilities, found that a number of these facilities have had or may have had releases of hazardous materials that may require remediation and also may be subject to potential liabilities for contamination from off-site disposal of substances or wastes. These assessments also found that reporting and other regulatory requirements, including waste management procedures, were not or may not have been satisfied. Although there can be no assurance, the Company believes that, based in part on the investigations conducted, in part on certain remediation completed prior to or since the acquisitions, and in part on the indemnification provisions of the agreements entered into in connection with the Company's acquisitions, the Company will not incur any material liabilities relating to these matters.

In connection with the sale of the Distribution Group, a former segment of the Company’s business discontinued and sold during 2000 (the "DG Sale") and now known as Axiom Automotive Technologies, the Company agreed to certain matters with the buyer that could result in contingent liability to the Company in the future. These include the Company's indemnification of the buyer against (i) environmental liability at former Distribution Group facilities that had been closed prior to the DG Sale, including former manufacturing facilities in Azusa, California, Mexicali, Mexico and Dayton, Ohio, (ii) any other environmental liability of the Distribution Group relating to periods prior to the DG Sale, in most cases subject to a $750 deductible and a $12,000 cap except with respect to closed facilities and (iii) any tax liability of the Distribution Group relating to periods prior to the DG Sale. During 2002, the Company negotiated an additional $100 deductible applicable to all Distribution Group claims for indemnification. In addition, prior to the DG Sale several of the Distribution Group's real estate and equipment leases with terms ending on various dates through 2007, were guaranteed by the Company. These guarantees, which originated prior to the time of the DG Sale, remain in effect after the DG Sale so the Company continues to be liable for the Distribution Group's obligations under such leases in the event that the Distribution Group does not honor those obligations. As of June 30, 2006, minimum lease obligations related to these leases totaled $601 for which the Company has no liability recognition requirement. The Distribution Group has indemnified the Company against any damages relating to the Company’s guarantees, however the Company holds no assets as collateral for these obligations.

Note 14.
Subsequent Event

On July 17, 2006, the Company completed the sale of its Independent Aftermarket engine business to Proformance Technologies, LLC. As part of the sale, the Company received proceeds of $2,051 which is subject to increase or decrease based upon the finalization of certain inventory and receivable amounts. The Company does not expect to record any significant additional adjustments to the loss from the sale of this business (see Note 12 - Discontinued Operations).
 



15

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statement Notice

Readers are cautioned that certain statements contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations that are not related to historical results are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are predictive, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as "may," "could," "should," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "predict" and similar expressions and their variants, as they relate to us or our management, may identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements concerning future financial performance (including future revenues, earnings or growth rates), ongoing business strategies or prospects, and possible future Company actions are also forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, projections and assumptions regarding future events that may not prove to be accurate. These statements reflect our judgment as of the date of this Quarterly Report with respect to future events, the outcome of which are subject to risks, which may have a significant impact on our business, operating results or financial condition. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results or outcomes may differ materially from those described herein. We undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, dependence on significant customers, possible component parts and/or core shortages, the ability to achieve and manage growth, future indebtedness and liquidity, environmental matters, and competition. For a discussion of these and certain other factors, please refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Please also refer to our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies, some of which require management to make estimates and assumptions regarding matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe that the following are the more critical judgment areas in the application of our accounting policies that currently affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the failure of our customers to make required payments. We evaluate the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts and make judgments and estimates in determining the appropriate allowance at each reporting period based on historical experience, credit evaluations, specific customer collection issues and the length of time a receivable is past due. Since our accounts receivable are often concentrated in a relatively few number of customers, a significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any one of these customers could have a material adverse impact on our financial statements. For each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, our write-offs were less than $0.1 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, our write-offs were approximately $0.1 million and $10 thousand, respectively. As of June 30, 2006, we had $78.5 million of accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.0 million.

16

Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence. We make adjustments to write down our inventories for estimated excess and obsolete inventory equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about market conditions, future demand and expected usage rates. Changes in economic conditions, customer demand, product introductions or pricing changes can affect the carrying value of our inventory. Demand for our products has fluctuated in the past and may do so in the future, which could result in an increase in excess quantities on hand. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, causing usage rates to vary from those estimated, additional inventory write-downs may be required. Although no assurance can be given, these write-downs would not be expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial statements. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we recorded charges for excess and obsolete inventory of approximately $0.8 million, $1.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, we recorded charges for excess and obsolete inventory of approximately $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2006 we had inventory of $58.4 million, net of a reserve for excess and obsolete inventory of $4.2 million.

Warranty Liability. We provide an allowance for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including inspection and testing at various stages of the remanufacturing process and the testing of each finished assembly on equipment designed to simulate performance under operating conditions, our warranty obligation is affected by the number of products sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims and costs per unit and actual product failure rates. Additionally, we participate in the tear-down and analysis of returned products with certain of our customers to assess responsibility for product failures. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, we (i) recorded charges for estimated warranty costs of approximately $1.3 million and $3.4 million, respectively and (ii) paid and/or settled warranty claims of approximately $1.5 million and $3.7 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, we (i) recorded charges for estimated warranty costs of approximately $0.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively and (ii) paid and/or settled warranty claims of approximately $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Should actual product failure rates differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability may be required. Although no assurance can be given, these revisions would not be expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial statements.

Goodwill and Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets. Effective with the adoption of SFAS No. 142, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized, however they are tested annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill may be impaired, and if the carrying value is greater than the fair value an impairment loss is recorded. Impairment is tested at a level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit, which generally is an operating segment or a component of an operating segment as defined in paragraph 10 of SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. In accordance with paragraph 30 of SFAS No. 142, certain components of an operating segment with similar economic characteristics are aggregated and deemed a single reporting unit. In estimating the fair value of our reporting units, we utilize a valuation technique based on multiples of projected cash flow, giving consideration to unusual items, cost reduction initiatives, new business initiatives and other factors that generally would be considered in determining value. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. If we were to lose a key customer within a particular operating segment or its sales were to decrease materially, impairment adjustments that may be required could have a material adverse impact on our financial statements. As of June 30, 2006, goodwill is recorded at a carrying value of approximately $146.7 million. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of September 30th of each year unless events or circumstances would require an immediate review.

17

Deferred Income Taxes and Valuation Allowances. Tax law requires items to be included in the tax return at different times than when these items are reflected in the consolidated financial statements. As a result, our annual tax rate reflected in our consolidated financial statements is different than that reported in our tax return. Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in our tax return, and some differences reverse over time, such as depreciation expense. These timing differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The tax rates used to determine deferred tax assets or liabilities are the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Based on the evaluation of all available information, we recognize future tax benefits, such as net operating loss carryforwards, to the extent that realizing these benefits is considered more likely than not.

We evaluate our ability to realize the tax benefits associated with deferred tax assets by analyzing our forecasted taxable income using both historical and projected future operating results, the reversal of existing temporary differences, taxable income in prior carry-back years (if permitted) and the availability of tax planning strategies. A valuation allowance is required to be established unless management determines that it is more likely than not that we will ultimately realize the tax benefit associated with a deferred tax asset.

Accounting for Stock-Based Awards. On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. Prior to January 1, 2006, we had applied the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock options granted to our employees and directors under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, as permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Accordingly, employee and director compensation expense was recognized only for those options whose exercise price was less than the market value of the our common stock at the measurement date.

We have adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, using the modified prospective transition method. Under the modified prospective method, (i) compensation expense for share-based awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 are recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation cost calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes under SFAS No. 123 and (ii) compensation expense for all share-based awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 are based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Results for periods prior to January 1, 2006 have not been restated. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 we recorded pre-tax expense of $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for stock options compensation and classified this cost as part of selling, general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of income. The impact on both basic and diluted earnings per share for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was approximately $0.01 per share. The proforma pre-tax cost of stock options compensation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was $1.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively, for which no expense was recorded as allowed under the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25. For stock options granted as of June 30, 2006, we have yet to record, on a pre-tax basis, a total of $1.9 million of compensation expense which includes $0.8 million to be recognized over the last six months of 2006.


18

During 2006, we awarded share-based compensation to our employees and non-employee directors. A mix of stock options and restricted stock were granted to our non-employee directors, executive officers and business unit vice presidents and only restricted stock was granted to other employees. As compared to past awards, this award generally contained a greater number of restricted stock awards and a lower number of stock options. We made this change in an effort to match current market trends. See Note 9. - “Stock-Based Compensation.” For restricted stock granted as of June 30, 2006, we have yet to record, on a pre-tax basis, a total of $2.8 million of compensation expense which includes $1.0 million to be recognized over the last six months of 2006.


Results of Operations for the Three Month Period Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to the Three Month Period Ended June 30, 2005

During the three month period ended March 31, 2006, we exited our independent aftermarket businesses. These businesses remanufactured and distributed domestic and foreign engines and distributed domestic transmissions to independent aftermarket customers and were reported as “Other” in segment information previously disclosed. Accordingly, the operations of these businesses have been reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and this management’s discussion and analysis as discontinued operations for all periods presented. 

Income from continuing operations decreased $0.6 million, or 8.1%, to $6.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $7.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Income from continuing operations per diluted share was $0.31 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and $0.35 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Our results for 2006 included exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges of $0.4 million (net of tax) and an income tax charge of $0.2 million related to the revaluation of our deferred income tax attributes related to a change in certain state tax law. Our results for 2005 included (i) a gain of $0.4 million (net of tax) from the early redemption of a note receivable and (ii) exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges of $0.2 million (net of tax). Other factors which caused an increase to income from continuing operations in 2006 as compared to 2005 included :
 
 
·
an increase in volumes in our Logistics segment, primarily related to an increase in our base business with Cingular and the launch and roll-out of new business added during 2005 with Cingular, and to a lesser extent, Nokia, LG, T-Mobile and Thales; 

partially offset by:

 
·
lower volumes of Ford and Chrysler transmissions we believe to be primarily associated with inventory corrections in our customers’ distribution channels; we believe these inventory corrections were largely completed during the second quarter of 2006;
 
 
·
a reduction in volume of DaimlerChrysler remanufactured transmissions due to DaimlerChrysler’s decision not to use remanufactured transmissions for warranty repairs generally for model years 2003 and later, resulting in one less model year being in our warranty program each year (in 2005 DaimlerChrysler reversed this decision so we expect to see an increase in warranty volume in the future as they  begin  to add later  models and model years to the warranty program); and 

 
·
scheduled price reductions to certain customers in our Drivetrain and Logistics segments pursuant to recent contract renewals.

19

Net Sales

Net sales increased $22.9 million, or 23.1%, to $122.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $99.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily due to:
 
·
 an increase in volumes in our Logistics segment, primarily related to an increase in our base business with Cingular and the launch and roll-out of new business added during 2005 with Cingular, and to a lesser extent, Nokia, LG, T-Mobile and Thales; and
 
 
·
an increase in volume of medium/heavy duty remanufactured transmissions in our Drivetrain segment related to the roll-out of the program we launched for Allison in the fourth quarter of 2005 (under the terms of our remanufacturing program with Allison, we are required to purchase the transmission core; accordingly, our results for the three months ended June 30, 2006 reflect $5.3 million for core included in both net sales and cost of goods sold);

partially offset by:

 
·
lower volumes of Ford and Chrysler transmissions we believe to be primarily associated with inventory corrections in our customers’ distribution channels; we believe these inventory corrections were largely completed during the second quarter of 2006;

 
·
a reduction in volume of DaimlerChrysler remanufactured transmissions due to DaimlerChrysler’s decision not to use remanufactured transmissions for warranty repairs generally for model years 2003 and later, resulting in one less model year being in our warranty program each year (in 2005 DaimlerChrysler reversed this decision so we expect to see an increase in warranty volume in the future as they begin to add later models and model years to the warranty program); and

 
·
scheduled price reductions to certain customers in our Drivetrain and Logistics segments pursuant to recent contract renewals.

Of our net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, Cingular accounted for 45.7% and 28.4%, Ford accounted for 16.2% and 30.2%, Honda accounted for 14.5% and 17.3% and DaimlerChrysler accounted for 7.3% and 15.0%, respectively.
 
 
Gross Profit

Gross profit increased $1.4 million, or 5.6%, to $26.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $25.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily the result of the factors described above under “Net Sales,” combined with benefits from our on-going lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reduction initiatives. Additionally, gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased to 21.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 25.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to the change in mix of new business in our Logistics segment, the impact of core revenue from our medium/heavy-duty transmission remanufacturing program and scheduled price reductions, partially offset by benefits from our on-going lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reduction initiatives.


20

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense increased $1.7 million, or 14.2%, to $13.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $12.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The net increase is primarily the result of an increase in costs associated with revenue growth in our Logistics segment as well as for new product development in our Drivetrain segment, partially offset by benefits from our on-going lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reduction initiatives. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expense decreased to 11.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 12.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2005.


Exit, Disposal, Certain Severance and Other Charges.

During the three months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded $0.6 million ($0.4 million net of tax) of certain severance costs recorded in our Drivetrain segment. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we recorded $0.3 million ($0.2 million net of tax) of exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges primarily related to our capacity expansion within the Logistics segment.

As an on-going part of our planning process, we continue to identify and evaluate areas where cost efficiencies can be achieved through consolidation of redundant facilities, outsourcing functions or changing processes or systems. Implementation of any of these could require us to incur additional exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges, which would be offset over time by the projected cost savings.


Operating Income

Operating income decreased $0.4 million, or 3.2%, to $12.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $12.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This net decrease is primarily the result of the factors described above under “Net Sales,” “Gross Profit” and “SG&A Expense.” As a percentage of net sales, operating income decreased to 10.0% from 12.7%. This decrease was primarily due to the change in mix of new business in our Logistics segment, the impact of core revenue from our medium/heavy-duty transmission remanufacturing program and scheduled price reductions, partially offset by benefits from our on-going lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reduction initiatives.


Interest Income

Interest income decreased to $43 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was primarily due to the redemption of the note receivable from the Distribution Group in the second quarter of 2005, combined with lower cash balances invested in cash and equivalents during 2006 as compared to 2005. We expect lower interest income in 2006 as compared to 2005, due to the structure of our new revolving credit facility, which allows us to use cash to repay outstanding debt without a corresponding reduction in borrowing capacity.


21

Other Income (Expense), net

Other income (expense), net decreased to a loss of $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from income of $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. During 2005 we recorded a gain of $0.6 million from the early redemption of the note receivable we received as part of the proceeds from our former Distribution Group business, which we sold in October 2000. 


Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $1.0 million, or 52.6%, to $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in total debt outstanding, partially offset by a general increase in interest rates in 2006 as compared to 2005. We expect lower interest expense in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to the structure of our new revolving credit facility, which in addition to a reduced borrowing cost, allows us to use cash to repay outstanding debt, thereby reducing our total debt outstanding without a corresponding reduction in borrowing capacity.


Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense as a percentage of income from continuing operations increased to 39.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 36.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2005. During the three months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded an after-tax charge of $0.2 million related to the valuation of our deferred income taxes attributes due to a change in a state tax law. Based on our current estimate of the distribution of taxable income by state and currently enacted laws, we expect an effective income tax rate of approximately 36.9% for the balance of 2006.
 

Discontinued Operations

During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we made a decision to discontinue our Independent Aftermarket businesses. These businesses remanufactured and distributed domestic and foreign engines and distributed domestic transmissions to independent aftermarket customers and were reported as “Other” in segment information previously disclosed. During the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, we reported a loss of $48 thousand (net of tax) and a gain of $24 thousand (net of tax), respectively, from the reclassified results of our Independent Aftermarket businesses.

See Note 12 -- “Discontinued Operations” and Note 14 -- “Subsequent Event” in the financial statements. 



22

Reportable Segments

Drivetrain Segment

The following table presents net sales and segment profit expressed in millions of dollars and as a percentage of net sales:

 
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
 
2006
2005
Net sales
$
55.9
    
100.0
%
$
65.3
    
100.0
%
Segment profit
$
4.6
    
8.2
%
$
9.3
    
14.2
%

Net Sales. Net sales decreased $9.4 million, or 14.4%, to $55.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $65.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease was primarily due to:
 
 
·
lower volumes of Ford and Chrysler transmissions we believe to be primarily associated with inventory corrections in our customers’ distribution channels; we believe these inventory corrections were largely completed during the second quarter of 2006;

 
·
the impact of a 2005 sale of $2.6 million of transmission components at cost relating to end-of-life support for an OEM transmission program that ceased production in late 2000;
 
 
·
a reduction in volume of DaimlerChrysler remanufactured transmissions due to DaimlerChrysler’s decision not to use remanufactured transmissions for warranty repairs generally for model years 2003 and later, resulting in one less model year being in our warranty program each year (in 2005 DaimlerChrysler reversed this decision so we expect to see an increase in warranty volume in the future as they  begin  to add later  models and model years to the warranty program); and
 
 
·
scheduled price reductions to certain customers pursuant to recent contract renewals,
 
partially offset by:

 
·
an increase in volume of medium/heavy duty remanufactured transmissions related to the roll-out of the program we launched for Allison in the fourth quarter of 2005 (under the terms of our remanufacturing program with Allison, we are required to purchase the transmission core; accordingly, our results for the three months ended June 30, 2006 reflect $5.3 million for core included in both net sales and cost of goods sold); and

 
·
an increase in volume of Honda remanufactured transmissions.

Of our segment net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, Ford accounted for 35.3% and 45.6%, Honda accounted for 31.6% and 26.2% and DaimlerChrysler accounted for 15.9% and 22.8%, respectively.

Exit, Disposal, Certain Severance and Other Charges. During the three months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded a charge of $0.6 million related to certain severance costs incurred in our U.S. manufacturing operations. There were no similar costs recorded in 2005.

23

Segment Profit. Segment profit decreased $4.7 million, or 50.5%, to $4.6 million (8.2% of segment net sales) for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $9.3 million (14.2% of segment net sales) for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease resulted primarily from the factors described above under “Net Sales” and an increase in costs related to new product development, partially offset by benefits resulting from our lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reductions and a reduction of $0.5 million in allocated corporate overhead pursuant to our accounting policy of allocating corporate overhead based upon segment profitability.

 
Logistics Segment

The following table presents net sales and segment profit expressed in millions of dollars and as a percentage of net sales:

 
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
 
2006
2005
Net sales
$
66.2
    
100.0
%
$
33.8
    
100.0
%
Segment profit
$
7.6
    
11.5
%
$
3.3
    
9.8
%

Net Sales. Net sales increased $32.4 million, or 95.9%, to $66.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $33.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in volumes, primarily related to an increase in our base business with Cingular and the launch and roll-out of new business added during 2005 with Cingular, and to a lesser extent, Nokia, LG, T-Mobile and Thales. Sales to Cingular accounted for 84.3% and 83.3% of segment net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Exit, Disposal, Certain Severance and Other Charges. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we recorded $0.3 million of these costs primarily related to our capacity expansion. There were no similar costs recorded in 2006.

Segment Profit. Segment profit increased $4.3 million, or 130.3%, to $7.6 million (11.5% of segment net sales) for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $3.3 million (9.8% of segment net sales) for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily the result of the factors described above under “Net Sales” coupled with benefits of our lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by scheduled price reductions to certain customers pursuant to recent contract renewals and an increase of $0.5 million in allocated corporate overhead pursuant to our stated accounting policy of allocating corporate overhead based upon segment profitability.

24

Results of Operations for the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2005

Income from continuing operations decreased $0.6 million, or 4.6%, to $12.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $13.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Income from continuing operations per diluted share was $0.57 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to $0.61 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Our results for 2006 included (i) a charge of $1.1 million (net of tax) related to the write-off of deferred debt issuance costs associated with the early termination of our old credit facility and (ii) exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges of $0.4 million (net of tax), partially offset by an income tax benefit of $0.1 million (net of tax) related to the revaluation of our deferred income tax attributes. Our results for 2005 included (i) a gain of $0.4 million (net of tax) from the early redemption of a note receivable and (ii) exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges of $0.3 million (net of tax). Other factors which caused an increase to income from continuing operations in 2006 as compared to 2005 included: 

 
·
new business wins in our Logistics segment, including our test and repair program, and an increase in our base logistics business with Cingular;

 
·
benefits from our on-going lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reduction initiatives;

 
·
the launching of our medium/heavy duty remanufactured transmission program with Allison; and

 
·
an increase in volume of Honda remanufactured transmissions,

partially offset by:

 
·
lower volumes of Ford and Chrysler transmissions we believe to be primarily associated with inventory corrections in our customers’ distribution channels; we believe these inventory corrections were largely completed during the second quarter of 2006; and

 
·
scheduled price reductions to certain customers in our Drivetrain and Logistics segments pursuant to recent contract renewals;

 
·
a reduction in volume of DaimlerChrysler remanufactured transmissions due to DaimlerChrysler’s decision not to use remanufactured transmissions for warranty repairs generally for model years 2003 and later, resulting in one less model year being in our warranty program each year (in 2005 DaimlerChrysler reversed this decision so we expect to see an increase in warranty volume in the future as they  begin  to add later  models and model years to the warranty program); and

 
·
an increase in new business and product development cost in our Drivetrain segment.


25

Net Sales

Net sales increased $54.4 million, or 29.1%, to $241.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $187.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily due to:
 
 
·
an increase in volumes in our Logistics segment, primarily related to an increase in our base business with Cingular and the launch and roll-out of new business added during 2005 with Cingular, and to a lesser extent, Nokia, LG, T-Mobile and Thales; and

 
·
an increase in volume of medium/heavy duty remanufactured transmissions in our Drivetrain segment related to the roll-out of the program we launched for Allison in the fourth quarter of 2005 (under the terms of our remanufacturing program with Allison, we are required to purchase the transmission core; accordingly, our results for the six months ended June 30, 2006 reflect $11.8 million for core included in both net sales and cost of goods sold);

partially offset by:

 
·
lower volumes of Ford and Chrysler transmissions we believe to be primarily associated with inventory corrections in our customers’ distribution channels; we believe these inventory corrections were largely completed during the second quarter of 2006;

 
·
a reduction in volume of DaimlerChrysler remanufactured transmissions due to DaimlerChrysler’s decision not to use remanufactured transmissions for warranty repairs generally for model years 2003 and later, resulting in one less model year being in our warranty program each year (in 2005 DaimlerChrysler reversed this decision so we expect to see an increase in warranty volume in the future as they  begin  to add later  models and model years to the warranty program); and

 
·
scheduled price reductions to certain customers in our Drivetrain and Logistics segments pursuant to recent contract renewals.

Of our net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, Cingular accounted for 43.5% and 28.9%, Honda accounted for 15.6% and 18.9%, Ford accounted for 15.1% and 27.4% and DaimlerChrysler accounted for 7.8% and 15.3%, respectively.


Gross Profit

Gross profit increased $4.0 million, or 8.6%, to $50.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $46.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily the result of the factors described above under “Net Sales,” combined with benefits from our on-going lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reduction initiatives. Additionally, as a percentage of net sales, gross profit decreased to 21.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 25.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to the change in mix of new business in our Logistics segment, the impact of core revenue from our medium/heavy-duty transmission remanufacturing program and scheduled price reductions, partially offset by benefits from our on-going lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reduction initiatives.


26

SG&A Expense

SG&A expense increased $2.7 million, or 11.5%, to $26.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $23.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The net increase is primarily the result of an increase in costs associated with revenue growth in our Logistics segment as well as for new product development in our Drivetrain segment, partially offset by benefits from our on-going lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reduction initiatives. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expense decreased to 10.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 12.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2005.


Exit, Disposal, Certain Severance and Other Charges.

During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded $0.7 million ($0.4 million net of tax) of certain severance costs recorded in our Drivetrain segment. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we recorded $0.4 million ($0.3 million net of tax) of exit, disposal, certain severance and other charges primarily related to our capacity expansion within the Logistics segment.


Operating Income

Operating income increased $1.0 million, or 4.4%, to $23.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $22.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This net increase is primarily the result of the factors described above under “Net Sales,” “Gross Profit” and “SG&A Expense.” As a percentage of net sales, operating income decreased to 9.8% from 12.1%. This decrease was primarily due to the change in mix of new business in our Logistics segment, the impact of core revenue from our medium/heavy-duty transmission remanufacturing program and scheduled price reductions, partially offset by benefits from our on-going lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reduction initiatives. 


Interest Income

Interest income decreased $0.7 million, or 58.3%, to $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was primarily due to the redemption of the note receivable from the Distribution Group in the second quarter of 2005, partially offset by higher cash balances invested in cash and equivalents during 2006 as compared to 2005. Additionally, we expect lower interest income in 2006 as compared to 2005, due to the structure of our new revolving credit facility, which allows us to use cash to repay outstanding debt without a corresponding reduction in borrowing capacity.


Other Income (Expense), net

Other income (expense), net decreased to a loss of $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from income of $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was primarily due to a gain of $0.6 million recorded from the early redemption of the note receivable from the Distribution Group during 2005. 


Write-Off of Debt Issuance Costs

On March 21, 2006, we paid the balance outstanding under our old credit facility and terminated the related credit and security agreements.  As a result, we recorded a non-cash charge of $1.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2006 to write off deferred debt issuance costs associated with the early termination of the facility.

27

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $1.1 million, or 28.2%, to $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in total debt outstanding, partially offset by a general increase in interest rates in 2006 as compared to 2005. Additionally, we expect lower interest expense in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to the structure of our new revolving credit facility, which in addition to a reduced borrowing cost, allows us to use cash to repay outstanding debt, thereby reducing our total debt outstanding without a corresponding reduction in borrowing capacity.


Reportable Segments

Drivetrain Segment
 
The following table presents net sales and segment profit expressed in millions of dollars and as a percentage of net sales:
 
   
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
   
2006
2005
Net sales
  
$
113.6
    
100.0
%
$
122.0
    
100.0
%
Segment profit
  
$
10.1
    
8.9
%
$
15.9
    
13.0
%

Net Sales. Net sales decreased $8.4 million, or 6.9%, to $113.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $122.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease was primarily due to:
 
·
lower volumes of Ford and Chrysler transmissions we believe to be primarily associated with inventory corrections in our customers’ distribution channels; we believe these inventory corrections were largely completed during the second quarter of 2006;
 
·
the impact of a 2005 sale of $2.9 million of transmission components at cost relating to end-of-life support for an OEM transmission program that ceased production in late 2000;
 
·
a reduction in volume of DaimlerChrysler remanufactured transmissions due to DaimlerChrysler’s decision not to use remanufactured transmissions for warranty repairs generally for model years 2003 and later, resulting in one less model year being in our warranty program each year (in 2005 DaimlerChrysler reversed this decision so we expect to see an increase in warranty volume in the future as they  begin  to add later  models and model years to the warranty program); and
 
·
scheduled price reductions to certain customers pursuant to recent contract renewals,
 
partially offset by:

 
·
an increase in volume of medium/heavy duty remanufactured transmissions related to the roll-out of the program we launched for Allison in the fourth quarter of 2005 (under the terms of our remanufacturing program with Allison, we are required to purchase the transmission core; accordingly, our results for the six months ended June 30, 2006 reflect $11.8 million for core included in both net sales and cost of goods sold); and

28
·
an increase in volume of Honda remanufactured transmissions.

Of our segment net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, Honda accounted for 33.1% and 29.0%, Ford accounted for 32.0% and 41.7% and DaimlerChrysler accounted for 16.5% and 23.4%, respectively.

Segment Profit. Segment profit decreased $5.8 million, or 36.5%, to $10.1 million (8.9% of segment net sales) for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $15.9 million (13.0% of segment net sales) for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This resulted primarily from the factors described above under “Net Sales” and an increase in new business and product development costs, partially offset by benefits resulting from our lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reductions and a reduction of $1.0 million in allocated corporate overhead pursuant to our accounting policy of allocating corporate overhead based upon segment profitability.

Exit, Disposal, Certain Severance and Other Charges. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded $0.7 million of certain severance costs including $0.6 million incurred in our U.S. manufacturing operations and $0.1 million incurred in our European operations. There were no similar costs recorded in 2005.


Logistics Segment
 
The following table presents net sales and segment profit expressed in millions of dollars and as a percentage of net sales:

   
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
   
2006
2005
Net sales
  
$
127.9
    
100.0
%
$
65.0
    
100.0
%
Segment profit
  
$
13.6
    
10.6
%
$
6.8
    
10.5
%
 
Net Sales. Net sales increased $62.9 million, or 96.8%, to $127.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $65.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to new business programs, including our test and repair, kitting and other programs with Cingular, combined with an increase in our base fulfillment business, partially offset by scheduled price reductions to certain customers pursuant to contracts entered into in 2003. Sales to Cingular accounted for 82.1% and 83.0% of segment net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Segment Profit. Segment profit increased $6.8 million, or 100.0%, to $13.6 million (10.6% of segment net sales) for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $6.8 million (10.5% of segment net sales) for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily the result of the factors described above under “Net Sales,” combined with the benefits of our lean and continuous improvement program and other cost reductions, partially offset by costs and other start-up inefficiencies associated with our capacity expansion efforts and an increase of $1.2 million in allocated corporate overhead pursuant to our accounting policy of allocating corporate overhead based upon segment profitability.

Exit, Disposal, Certain Severance and Other Charges. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we recorded $0.5 million of these costs primarily related to our capacity expansion. There were no similar costs recorded in 2006.

29

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had total cash and cash equivalents on hand of $5.6 million at June 30, 2006. Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $0.8 million for the six-month period then ended. During the period, we used $22.3 million of cash from our working capital accounts including:
 
·
$6.2 million for accounts receivable primarily as the result of increased sales volumes to customers in our Logistics segment,
 
·
$6.9 million for inventories primarily related to increased test and repair volume in our Logistics segment; and
 
·
$9.1 million for accounts payable and accrued expenses primarily due to the payment of 2005 incentive compensation and the settlement of payables pursuant to the purchase of a portion of a business from one of our suppliers
 
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations of $7.0 million for the period included $4.1 million of capital spending primarily related to machinery and equipment for new business initiatives and capacity maintenance efforts, $1.7 million for assets of a business purchased from one of our suppliers and $1.2 million of net purchases of available-for-sale securities for our nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Net cash used in financing activities of $38.1 million included payments of $90.7 million related to the termination of our old credit facility, $4.7 million for treasury stock repurchases of 217,316 shares of our common stock and $0.8 million of payments for debt issuance costs related to our new credit facility (see discussion below), partially offset by $49.2 million of borrowings under our new credit facility and $7.4 million of cash proceeds and $1.5 million of tax benefits from the exercise of stock options by our employees and non-employee directors.

For 2006, we have planned approximately $10-12 million for capital expenditures, consisting of approximately $5-6 million in support of new business initiatives and $5-6 million in support of capacity maintenance and cost reduction initiatives.

Our new credit agreement provides for a $150.0 million revolving credit facility available through March 2011. Our credit facility also provides for the ability to increase the facility by up to $75.0 million in the aggregate, subject to certain conditions (including the receipt from one or more lenders of the additional commitments that may be requested) and achievement of certain financial ratios. Amounts advanced under the credit facility are guaranteed by all of our domestic subsidiaries and secured by substantially all of our assets and the assets of our domestic subsidiaries.

At our election, amounts advanced under the revolving credit facility will bear interest at either (i) the Base Rate plus a specified margin or (ii) the Eurocurrency Rate plus a specified margin. The Base Rate is equal to the higher of (a) the lender’s prime rate or (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%. The applicable margins for both Base Rate and Eurodollar Rate loans are subject to quarterly adjustments based on our leverage ratio as of the end of the four fiscal quarters then completed.
 
As of June 30, 2006, our borrowing capacity under the new credit facility was $98.8 million, net of $2.0 million for outstanding letters of credit.

We were in compliance with all the credit facility’s debt covenants as of June 30, 2006.

30

Our revolving credit agreement with HSBC Bank Plc provides for £0.5 million, or $0.9 million in U.S. dollars, to finance the working capital requirements of our U.K. subsidiary. Amounts advanced are secured by substantially all the assets of our U.K. subsidiary. Interest accrues at the HSBC Bank prime lending rate plus 1.50% and is payable monthly. HSBC Bank may at any time demand repayment of all sums owing. As of June 30, 2006, there were no amounts outstanding under this line of credit.

On October 8, 2005, our customer, Delphi Corporation filed a voluntary petition for business reorganization under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. Our pre-bankruptcy net receivable from Delphi is less than $0.3 million, of which $0.1 million has been currently reserved. We cannot estimate the impact of the Delphi bankruptcy on our future business or on the collectibility of our receivables but we expect that its effect will not be material to our business or financial position.

On February 16, 2006, we announced our intention to commence a program for the repurchase of up to 2% of our outstanding common stock during the balance of 2006. It is our intent to repurchase shares, from time to time, to offset the potential dilutive impact of stock option exercises and restricted stock grants under our stock incentive plans. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we repurchased 200,169 shares of our common stock for approximately $4.3 million pursuant to this program.

On July 17, 2006, we completed the sale of our Independent Aftermarket engine business and received proceeds of $2.1 million.

We believe that cash on hand, cash flow from operations and existing borrowing capacity will be sufficient to fund ongoing operations and budgeted capital expenditures. In pursuing future acquisitions, we will continue to consider the effect any such acquisition costs may have on liquidity. In order to consummate such acquisitions, we may need to seek funds through additional borrowings or equity financing.



31

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
Derivative Financial Instruments. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. We have used derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. Neither the aggregate value of these derivative financial instruments nor the market risk posed by them has been material to our business. As of June 30, 2006, we were not using any derivative financial instruments.

Interest Rate Exposure. Based on our overall interest rate exposure during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and assuming similar interest rate volatility in the future, a near-term (12 months) change in interest rates would not materially affect our consolidated financial position, results of operation or cash flows. As of June 30, 2006, interest rate movements of 100 basis points would have resulted in an approximate $0.5 million increase or decrease in interest expense over a one-year period.

Foreign Exchange Exposure. Our revenue, expense and capital purchasing activities are primarily transacted in U.S. dollars. We have one foreign operation that exposes us to translation risk when the local currency financial statements are translated to U.S. dollars. Since changes in translation risk are reported as adjustments to stockholders' equity, a 10% change in the foreign exchange rate would not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operation or cash flows. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, a 10% change in the foreign exchange rate would have increased or decreased our consolidated net income by approximately $11 thousand.


Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Our management, including Chief Executive Officer Donald T. Johnson, Jr. and Chief Financial Officer Todd R. Peters, have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter covered by this report. Under rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, disclosure controls and procedures are defined as those "controls or other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms." Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, management determined that such controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2006, the date of the conclusion of the evaluation.

Further, there were no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls after June 30, 2006, the date of the conclusion of the evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

During the second quarter of 2006 we started the process of converting our two U.S.-based Drivetrain operations to a general ledger system also used by our Logistics business. As of June 30, 2006, we have converted one of the Drivetrain operations and expect to convert the other Drivetrain operation during the three months ending September 30, 2006. We believe these conversions did not and will not have a material effect on our internal controls over financial reporting.

There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the second quarter of 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


32

AFTERMARKET TECHNOLOGY CORP.

Part II.    Other Information

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On February 16, 2006, we announced our intention to commence a program for the repurchase of up to 2% of our outstanding common stock during the balance of 2006. We plan to repurchase shares, from time to time, to offset the potential dilutive impact of stock option exercises and restricted stock grants under our stock incentive plans. As part of this program, we purchased 200,169 shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of $4,333,152 during the three months ended March 31, 2006. There were no purchases made under this plan during the three months ended June 30, 2006.

During May and June 2006, certain employees of the Company delivered to us 11,525 shares of our outstanding common stock in payment of $286,419 of withholding tax obligations arising from the vesting of restricted stock previously awarded under our stock incentive plans. Per the stock incentive plan under which the stock awards were granted, the shares delivered to us were valued at an average price of $24.85 per share, the average of the closing prices of our common stock on the vesting dates of the restricted stock.

Following is a summary of treasury stock acquisitions made during the three month period ended June 30, 2006:
 
Period
  
Total
number of
Shares
Purchased
  
 Weighted-
Average Price
Paid per Share
  
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of a
Publicly
Announced Plan
  
Maximum
Number of
Shares that May
Yet Be
Purchased
Under the Plan (1)
April 1-30, 2006
  
-
  
$
−
  
-
  
-
May 1-31, 2006
  
3,833
  
$
24.80
  
3,833
  
235,865
June 1-30, 2006
  
7,692
  
$
24.88
  
7,692
  
235,865
(1)  Excludes shares acquired under our stock incentive plans to satisfy withholding tax obligations of employees and non-employee directors upon the vesting of  restricted stock.
 
As a holding company with no independent operations, our ability to pay cash dividends is dependent upon the receipt of dividends or other payments from our subsidiaries. In addition, the agreement for our bank credit facility contains certain covenants that, among other things, place significant limitations on the payment of dividends.

33
 
Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The 2006 annual meeting of stockholders of the Company was held on May 31, 2006 for the purpose of (i) electing seven directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and thereafter until their successors are elected and qualified and (ii) approving the adoption of our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.

The following directors were elected by the following vote:
 
 
Votes
 
For
Against
Robert L. Evans
19,696,107
   470,475
Curtland E. Fields
19,696,257
   470,325
Dr. Michael J. Hartnett
19,318,927
   847,655
Donald T. Johnson, Jr.
19,639,791
   526,791
Michael D. Jordan
19,696,257
   470,325
S. Lawrence Prendergast
19,025,495
 1,141,087
Edward Stewart
19,318,777
   847,805


The proposal to approve the adoption of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan was approved by the following vote:

 
For
 
Against
Nonvotes and
  Abstentions  
14,181,413
5,118,598
114,304
 
 
Item 6.  Exhibits

          31.1    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
    
          31.2    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
 
          32.1    Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
 
          32.2    Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

34

AFTERMARKET TECHNOLOGY CORP.


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
     
  AFTERMARKET TECHNOLOGY CORP.
 
 		  
 		  
 
Date:  July 25, 2006 By:   /s/ Todd R. Peters
  Todd R. Peters, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
·
Todd R. Peters is signing in the dual capacities as i) the principal financial officer, and ii) a duly authorized officer of the company.

35