UNITED STATES | ||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | ||
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 | ||
FORM 10-Q | ||
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2015 |
Commission File Number 1-9750 |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | ||
Delaware | 38-2478409 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1334 York Avenue New York, New York | 10021 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 606-7000 | ||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of the Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ý | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No ý
As of July 31, 2015, there were 69,496,777 outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE | ||
2#
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SOTHEBY’S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(Thousands of dollars, except per share data)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Agency commissions and fees | $ | 310,377 | $ | 316,187 | $ | 438,259 | $ | 439,315 | ||||||||
Inventory sales | 7,005 | 8,733 | 19,988 | 34,734 | ||||||||||||
Finance | 11,970 | 8,140 | 24,657 | 13,822 | ||||||||||||
License fees | 2,468 | 2,462 | 4,442 | 4,159 | ||||||||||||
Other | 186 | 295 | 335 | 598 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | 332,006 | 335,817 | 487,681 | 492,628 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Agency direct costs | 32,730 | 31,617 | 44,569 | 42,054 | ||||||||||||
Cost of inventory sales | 16,989 | 7,518 | 28,702 | 32,020 | ||||||||||||
Cost of Finance revenues | 3,874 | 2,024 | 7,262 | 2,734 | ||||||||||||
Marketing | 4,748 | 4,564 | 8,808 | 7,697 | ||||||||||||
Salaries and related | 108,182 | 97,833 | 171,112 | 163,589 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 44,731 | 38,210 | 79,460 | 75,542 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,781 | 5,066 | 9,563 | 10,213 | ||||||||||||
CEO separation and transition costs (see Note 13) | 43 | — | 4,232 | — | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges, net (see Note 14) | (530 | ) | — | (889 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Special charges (see Note 15) | — | 18,554 | — | 24,257 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses | 215,548 | 205,386 | 352,819 | 358,106 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 116,458 | 130,431 | 134,862 | 134,522 | ||||||||||||
Interest income | 630 | 402 | 759 | 818 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (9,074 | ) | (8,768 | ) | (17,735 | ) | (17,551 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense) | 245 | 694 | (1,714 | ) | (748 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before taxes | 108,259 | 122,759 | 116,172 | 117,041 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of investees | 1,982 | 230 | 3,126 | 384 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 42,789 | 45,344 | 46,713 | 45,675 | ||||||||||||
Net income | 67,452 | 77,645 | 72,585 | 71,750 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest | (120 | ) | 13 | (189 | ) | 232 | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 67,572 | $ | 77,632 | $ | 72,774 | $ | 71,518 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share - Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 0.97 | $ | 1.12 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.02 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share - Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 0.96 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.01 | ||||||||
Weighted average basic shares outstanding | 69,332 | 68,938 | 69,211 | 69,041 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding | 69,884 | 69,491 | 69,794 | 69,619 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 4.54 | ||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3#
SOTHEBY’S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(Thousands of dollars)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 67,452 | $ | 77,645 | $ | 72,585 | $ | 71,750 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $2,047 and $380 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 | 17,553 | 4,029 | (1,716 | ) | 5,497 | |||||||||||
Reclassification of cumulative translation adjustment included in net income | — | — | — | 2,058 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of previously unrecognized net pension losses and prior service costs included in net income, net of tax of $217, $120, $432, and $237 | 867 | 479 | 1,725 | 951 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | 18,420 | 4,508 | 9 | 8,506 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 85,872 | 82,153 | 72,594 | 80,256 | ||||||||||||
Less: Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest | (120 | ) | 13 | (189 | ) | 232 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 85,992 | $ | 82,140 | $ | 72,783 | $ | 80,024 | ||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4#
SOTHEBY’S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) (Thousands of dollars) | ||||||||||||
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||
A S S E T S | ||||||||||||
Current Assets: | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 613,688 | $ | 693,829 | $ | 576,445 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 37,072 | 32,837 | 56,656 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,854, $7,318, and $6,995 | 822,725 | 913,743 | 993,302 | |||||||||
Notes receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $1,359, $1,166, and $1,001 | 57,847 | 130,796 | 96,883 | |||||||||
Inventory | 257,993 | 217,132 | 218,878 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes and income tax receivable | 32,509 | 17,078 | 41,336 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 34,266 | 34,107 | 27,633 | |||||||||
Total Current Assets | 1,856,100 | 2,039,522 | 2,011,133 | |||||||||
Notes receivable | 748,204 | 568,942 | 510,905 | |||||||||
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $200,181, $191,260, and $188,273 | 357,768 | 364,382 | 373,476 | |||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $5,247, $5,760, and $6,415 | 14,153 | 14,341 | 14,914 | |||||||||
Equity method investments | 41,557 | 10,210 | 10,862 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes and income tax receivable | 18,940 | 38,202 | 38,836 | |||||||||
Trust assets related to deferred compensation liability | 48,370 | 50,490 | 52,041 | |||||||||
Pension asset | 31,671 | 28,993 | 41,525 | |||||||||
Other long-term assets | 20,756 | 19,738 | 19,309 | |||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 3,137,519 | $ | 3,134,820 | $ | 3,073,001 | ||||||
L I A B I L I T I E S A N D S H A R E H O L D E R S’ E Q U I T Y | ||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Due to consignors | $ | 781,927 | $ | 980,470 | $ | 1,000,029 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 101,255 | 111,639 | 129,071 | |||||||||
Accrued salaries and related costs | 69,011 | 88,915 | 56,174 | |||||||||
York Property Mortgage | 6,542 | 218,728 | 3,730 | |||||||||
Accrued and deferred income taxes | 35,547 | 13,828 | 46,808 | |||||||||
Other current liabilities | 15,684 | 15,627 | 16,068 | |||||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 1,009,966 | 1,429,207 | 1,251,880 | |||||||||
Credit facility borrowings | 593,000 | 445,000 | 345,000 | |||||||||
Long-term debt, net | 512,067 | 300,000 | 515,031 | |||||||||
Accrued and deferred income taxes | 18,621 | 21,192 | 21,182 | |||||||||
Deferred compensation liability | 48,269 | 49,633 | 51,350 | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 8,915 | 11,550 | 11,413 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities | 2,190,838 | 2,256,582 | 2,195,856 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 9) | ||||||||||||
Shareholders’ Equity: | ||||||||||||
Common Stock, $0.01 par value | 700 | 695 | 695 | |||||||||
Authorized shares—200,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Issued shares—70,054,948, 69,550,073, and 69,525,947 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding shares—69,496,777, 68,991,902, and 68,967,776 | ||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 418,764 | 408,874 | 394,261 | |||||||||
Treasury stock, at cost: 558,171 shares at June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014 | (25,000 | ) | (25,000 | ) | (25,000 | ) | ||||||
Retained earnings | 628,626 | 569,894 | 537,565 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (76,757 | ) | (76,766 | ) | (30,947 | ) | ||||||
Total Shareholders’ Equity | 946,333 | 877,697 | 876,574 | |||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 348 | 541 | 571 | |||||||||
Total Equity | 946,681 | 878,238 | 877,145 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 3,137,519 | $ | 3,134,820 | $ | 3,073,001 | ||||||
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5#
SOTHEBY’S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) (Thousands of dollars) | ||||||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | |||||||
Operating Activities: | ||||||||
Net income attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 72,774 | $ | 71,518 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income attributable to Sotheby's to net cash used by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 9,563 | 10,213 | ||||||
Loss from cumulative translation adjustment upon liquidation of foreign subsidiary | — | 2,058 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense | 14,360 | 11,980 | ||||||
Share-based payments | 17,235 | 12,895 | ||||||
Net pension cost (benefit) | 784 | (350 | ) | |||||
Inventory writedowns and bad debt provisions | 13,825 | 3,316 | ||||||
Amortization of debt discount | 1,782 | 1,782 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments | (1,067 | ) | (3,625 | ) | ||||
Equity in earnings of investees | (3,126 | ) | (384 | ) | ||||
Other | (222 | ) | 1,366 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | 81,662 | (192,351 | ) | |||||
Due to consignors | (194,480 | ) | 50,770 | |||||
Inventory | (53,997 | ) | (34,495 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (5,857 | ) | (4,872 | ) | ||||
Other long-term assets | 3,251 | (1,391 | ) | |||||
Deferred income tax assets and income tax receivable | (10,512 | ) | (22,405 | ) | ||||
Accrued income taxes and deferred income tax liabilities | 18,543 | 20,098 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other liabilities | (30,818 | ) | 10,318 | |||||
Net cash used by operating activities | (66,300 | ) | (63,559 | ) | ||||
Investing Activities: | ||||||||
Funding of notes receivable | (262,060 | ) | (297,903 | ) | ||||
Collections of notes receivable | 163,373 | 247,234 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | (2,785 | ) | (3,634 | ) | ||||
Funding of equity method investment | (30,725 | ) | — | |||||
Distributions from equity investees | 2,500 | 875 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of equity method investment | 150 | 125 | ||||||
Increase in restricted cash | (6,434 | ) | (24,822 | ) | ||||
Net cash used by investing activities | (135,981 | ) | (78,125 | ) | ||||
Financing Activities: | ||||||||
Debt issuance and other borrowing costs | (2,572 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from credit facility borrowings | 162,000 | 345,000 | ||||||
Repayments of credit facility borrowings | (14,000 | ) | — | |||||
Repayments of York Property Mortgage | (1,901 | ) | (1,799 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of common stock | — | (25,000 | ) | |||||
Dividends paid | (16,439 | ) | (317,702 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options | — | 967 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments | 1,067 | 3,625 | ||||||
Funding of employee tax obligations upon the vesting of share-based payments | (8,897 | ) | (11,835 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | 119,258 | (6,744 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 2,882 | 3,558 | ||||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (80,141 | ) | (144,870 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 693,829 | 721,315 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 613,688 | $ | 576,445 | ||||
Supplemental information on non-cash investing and financing activities:
See Note 5 for information regarding non-cash transfers between Accounts Receivable (net) and Notes Receivable (net).
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6#
SOTHEBY’S
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein have been prepared by Sotheby’s pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America (the “U.S.”) have been condensed or omitted from this report, as is permitted by such rules and regulations; however, the management of Sotheby’s believes that the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading and that all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are reflected in the interim periods presented. It is suggested that these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Sotheby’s 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Sotheby’s wholly-owned subsidiaries and Sotheby's Beijing Auction Co., Ltd ("Sotheby's Beijing"), a joint venture in which Sotheby's has a controlling 80% ownership interest. The net (loss) income attributable to the minority owner of Sotheby's Beijing is reported as "Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest" in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements and the non-controlling 20% ownership interest is reported as "Noncontrolling Interest" within the Equity section of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Equity investments through which Sotheby’s exercises significant influence over the investee, but does not control, are accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, Sotheby’s share of investee earnings or losses is recorded within Equity in Earnings of Investees in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements. Sotheby’s interest in the net assets of the investee is recorded within Equity Method Investments on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Sotheby's equity method investees include RM Sotheby's (see Note 7) and Acquavella Modern Art.
2. Seasonality of Business
The worldwide art auction market has two principal selling seasons, which generally occur in the second and fourth quarters of the year. In the aggregate, second and fourth quarter Net Auction Sales1 represented 79% and 83% of total Net Auction Sales in 2014 and 2013, respectively, with auction commission revenues comprising approximately 81% of Sotheby's total revenues in those years. Accordingly, Sotheby’s financial results are seasonal, with peak revenues and operating income generally occurring in the second and fourth quarters. Consequently, first and third quarter results have historically reflected lower revenues when compared to the second and fourth quarters and, typically, a net loss due to the fixed nature of many of Sotheby’s operating expenses.
3. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share—Basic earnings per share attributable to Sotheby's common shareholders is computed under the two-class method using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The two-class method requires that the amount of net income attributable to participating securities be deducted from consolidated net income in the computation of basic earnings per share. In periods with a net loss, the net loss attributable to participating securities is not deducted from consolidated net loss in the computation of basic loss per share as the impact would be anti-dilutive. Sotheby's participating securities include unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock shares, which have non-forfeitable rights to dividends. (See Note 12 for information on Sotheby's share-based payment programs.)
Diluted earnings per share—Diluted earnings per share attributable to Sotheby's common shareholders is computed in a similar manner to basic earnings per share under the two-class method, using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and, if dilutive, the weighted average number of potential common shares outstanding during the period. Sotheby's potential common shares currently include unvested performance share units held by employees, incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of employee stock options, and deferred stock units held by members of the Board of Directors. (See Note 12 for information on Sotheby's share-based payment programs.)
___________________________________________________________________
1 Net Auction Sales represents the hammer or sale price of property sold at auction.
7#
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, 0.9 million and 1 million potential common shares, respectively, related to unvested performance share units were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the profitability or stock price targets inherent in such awards were not achieved as of the balance sheet date. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, 1.1 million and 1.2 million potential common shares, respectively, related to unvested performance share units were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the profitability targets inherent in such awards were not achieved as of the balance sheet date.
The table below summarizes the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||
Basic: | |||||||||||||||||
Numerator: | |||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sotheby’s | $ | 67,572 | $ | 77,632 | $ | 72,774 | $ | 71,518 | |||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to participating securities | 590 | 256 | 485 | 1,001 | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 66,982 | $ | 77,376 | $ | 72,289 | $ | 70,517 | |||||||||
Denominator: | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted average basic shares outstanding | 69,332 | 68,938 | 69,211 | 69,041 | |||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share - Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 0.97 | $ | 1.12 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.02 | |||||||||
Diluted: | |||||||||||||||||
Numerator: | |||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sotheby’s | $ | 67,572 | $ | 77,632 | $ | 72,774 | $ | 71,518 | |||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to participating securities | 590 | 256 | 485 | 1,001 | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 66,982 | $ | 77,376 | $ | 72,289 | $ | 70,517 | |||||||||
Denominator: | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 69,332 | 68,938 | 69,211 | 69,041 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average effect of Sotheby's dilutive potential common shares: | |||||||||||||||||
Performance share units | 368 | 362 | 404 | 386 | |||||||||||||
Deferred stock units | 164 | 172 | 159 | 168 | |||||||||||||
Stock options | 20 | 19 | 20 | 24 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average dilutive potential common shares outstanding | 552 | 553 | 583 | 578 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding | 69,884 | 69,491 | 69,794 | 69,619 | |||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share - Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 0.96 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.01 | |||||||||
8#
4. Segment Reporting
Sotheby’s is a global art business whose operations are currently organized under two segments—Agency and Finance. The Agency segment earns commissions by matching buyers and sellers of authenticated fine art, decorative art, and jewelry (collectively, “art” or “works of art” or “artwork” or "property") through the auction or private sale process. To a much lesser extent, the Agency segment also earns revenues from the sale of artworks that have been purchased opportunistically by Sotheby’s. The Finance segment earns interest income through art-related financing activities by making loans that are secured by works of art.
Prior to the second quarter of 2015, Sotheby's also separately reported the results of the Principal segment, which was comprised of its dealer activities and principally included the sale of artworks purchased opportunistically by Sotheby’s. In the second quarter of 2015, Sotheby's transitioned to its new CEO and Chief Operating Decision Maker, and the information regularly reviewed for the purpose of allocating resources and assessing performance changed, reflecting a simplified internal reporting structure which was implemented in the quarter. As a resuly, beginning in the second quarter of 2015, the sale of artworks purchased opportunistically by Sotheby’s is reported as part of the Agency segment. The remaining activities of the former Principal segment are reported within All Other. Such activities include Sotheby’s retail wine operations, Acquavella Modern Art ("AMA"), an equity investee, and sales of the remaining inventory of Noortman Master Paintings, an art dealer that was owned and operated by Sotheby's from its acquisition in June 2006 until its closure in December 2013. Prior period amounts have been restated to reflect this new segment presentation.
The table below presents Sotheby’s revenues and income before taxes by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 | Agency (a) | Finance (a) | All Other | Reconciling items (a) | Total | |||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 314,403 | $ | 16,339 | $ | 5,633 | $ | (4,369 | ) | $ | 332,006 | |||||||||
Segment income before taxes | $ | 106,189 | $ | 10,170 | $ | 3,426 | $ | (11,526 | ) | $ | 108,259 | |||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 322,873 | $ | 12,344 | $ | 4,804 | $ | (4,204 | ) | $ | 335,817 | |||||||||
Segment income before taxes | $ | 130,930 | $ | 8,891 | (b) | $ | 1,910 | $ | (18,972 | ) | $ | 122,759 | ||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 454,092 | $ | 32,296 | $ | 8,932 | $ | (7,639 | ) | $ | 487,681 | |||||||||
Segment income before taxes | $ | 106,627 | $ | 20,990 | $ | 5,414 | $ | (16,859 | ) | $ | 116,172 | |||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 470,811 | $ | 21,291 | $ | 7,995 | $ | (7,469 | ) | $ | 492,628 | |||||||||
Segment income before taxes | $ | 123,901 | $ | 14,787 | (b) | $ | 3,308 | $ | (24,955 | ) | $ | 117,041 | ||||||||
(a) | The reconciling items related to Revenues consist principally of amounts charged by the Finance segment to the Agency segment, including interest and facility fees related to certain loans made to Agency segment clients, as well as, beginning on January 1, 2015, fees charged for term loan collateral sold at auction or privately through the Agency segment. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, such fees totaled $2.3 million and $4.3 million, respectively. Prior period segment results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 have been adjusted to include $2.2 million and $2.9 million of such fees, respectively. Each of the individual reconciling items related to segment income before taxes is listed in the table below. |
(b) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, Finance segment income before taxes includes $0.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of intercompany charges from Sotheby's global treasury function.
9#
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, Agency segment revenues consist of the following (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Auction commissions | $ | 287,487 | $ | 299,167 | $ | 400,502 | $ | 403,840 | ||||||||
Private sale commissions | 22,292 | 16,876 | 33,750 | 29,931 | ||||||||||||
Auction guarantees, net | (7,508 | ) | (6,215 | ) | (8,259 | ) | (5,545 | ) | ||||||||
Other Agency revenues (a) | 8,106 | 6,359 | 12,266 | 11,089 | ||||||||||||
Total Agency commissions and fees | 310,377 | 316,187 | 438,259 | 439,315 | ||||||||||||
Inventory sales | 4,026 | 6,686 | 15,833 | 31,496 | ||||||||||||
Total Agency segment revenues | $ | 314,403 | $ | 322,873 | $ | 454,092 | $ | 470,811 | ||||||||
(a) | Includes commissions and other fees earned by Sotheby's on sales brokered by third parties, fees charged to consignors for property withdrawn prior to auction and for catalogue production and insurance, and catalogue subscription and advertising revenues. |
The table below presents a reconciliation of segment income before taxes to consolidated income before taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Agency | $ | 106,189 | $ | 130,930 | $ | 106,627 | $ | 123,901 | ||||||||
Finance | 10,170 | 8,891 | 20,990 | 14,787 | ||||||||||||
All Other | 3,426 | 1,910 | 5,414 | 3,308 | ||||||||||||
Segment income before taxes | 119,785 | 141,731 | 133,031 | 141,996 | ||||||||||||
Reconciling items: | ||||||||||||||||
CEO separation and transition costs (see Note 13) | (43 | ) | — | (4,232 | ) | |||||||||||
Leadership transition severance costs (a) | (9,501 | ) | — | (9,501 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Special charges (see Note 15) | — | (18,554 | ) | — | (24,257 | ) | ||||||||||
Equity in earnings of investees (b) | (1,982 | ) | (418 | ) | (3,126 | ) | (698 | ) | ||||||||
Income before taxes | $ | 108,259 | $ | 122,759 | $ | 116,172 | $ | 117,041 | ||||||||
(a) | In the second quarter of 2015, in conjunction with its leadership transition, Sotheby's incurred severance costs of $9.5 million associated with the termination of the employment of certain Executive Officers, including its Chief Operating Officer. |
(b) | For segment reporting purposes, Sotheby's share of earnings related to its equity investees is included as part of income before taxes. However, such earnings are reported separately below income before taxes in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, Agency segment results include $1 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of equity earnings related to RM Sotheby's. For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, All Other includes $1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of equity earnings related to Acquavella Modern Art. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, All Other includes $1.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, of equity earnings related to Acquavella Modern Art. |
10#
The table below presents Sotheby's assets by segment, as well as a reconciliation of segment assets to consolidated assets as of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||
Agency | $ | 2,247,411 | $ | 2,391,763 | $ | 2,350,976 | ||||||
Finance | 812,012 | 658,710 | 611,461 | |||||||||
All Other | 26,647 | 29,067 | 30,392 | |||||||||
Total segment assets | 3,086,070 | 3,079,540 | 2,992,829 | |||||||||
Unallocated amounts: | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets and income tax receivable | 51,449 | 55,280 | 80,172 | |||||||||
Consolidated assets | $ | 3,137,519 | $ | 3,134,820 | $ | 3,073,001 | ||||||
5. Receivables
Accounts Receivable, Net—Through its Agency segment, Sotheby's accepts property on consignment and matches sellers, also known as consignors, to buyers through the auction or private sale process. Following an auction or private sale, Sotheby's invoices the buyer for the purchase price of the property (including any commissions owed by the buyer), collects payment from the buyer, and remits to the consignor the net sale proceeds after deducting its commissions, expenses and applicable taxes and royalties.
Under Sotheby’s standard auction payment terms, payments from buyers are due no more than 30 days from the sale date and payments to consignors are due 35 days from the sale date. For private sales, payment from the buyer is typically due on the sale date, with the net sale proceeds being due to the consignor shortly thereafter. Extended payment terms are sometimes provided to an auction or private sale buyer. For auctions, the extent to which extended payment terms are provided to buyers can vary considerably from selling season to selling season. Extended payment terms typically extend the payment due date to a date that is no longer than one year from the sale date. In limited circumstances, the payment due date may be extended to a date that is beyond one year from the sale date. All extended payment term arrangements are approved by management under Sotheby's internal corporate governance policy. When providing extended payment terms, Sotheby’s attempts to match the timing of cash receipt from the buyer with the timing of payment to the consignor, but is not always successful in doing so.
In the limited circumstances when the payment due date is extended to a date that is beyond one year from the sale date, if the consignor does not provide Sotheby's matched payment terms, the receivable balance is reclassified from Accounts Receivable to Notes Receivable in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, Notes Receivable within the Agency segment included $22.6 million and $22.7 million, respectively, of amounts reclassified from Accounts Receivable. As of June 30, 2014, there were no such Notes Receivable outstanding. (See discussion of Agency segment Notes Receivable below.)
Under the standard terms and conditions of its auction and private sales, Sotheby’s is not obligated to pay the consignor for property that has not been paid for by the buyer. If a buyer defaults on payment, the sale may be cancelled, and the property will be returned to the consignor. Alternatively, the consignor may reoffer the property at a future Sotheby's auction or negotiate a private sale with Sotheby's acting as its agent. In certain instances and subject to management approval under Sotheby’s internal corporate governance policy, the consignor may be paid the net sale proceeds before payment is collected from the buyer and/or the buyer may be allowed to take possession of the property before making payment. In situations when the buyer takes possession of the property before making payment, Sotheby’s is liable to the seller for the net sales proceeds whether or not the buyer makes payment. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, Accounts Receivable (net) included $107.6 million, $116 million, and $126.6 million, respectively, related to situations when Sotheby's paid the consignor all or a portion of the net sales proceeds before payment was collected from the buyer. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, Accounts Receivable (net) also included $75.4 million, $96.5 million, and $48.9 million, respectively, related to situations when the buyer was allowed to take possession of the property before making payment to Sotheby’s.
Notes Receivable (Finance Segment)—The Finance segment provides certain collectors and art dealers with financing secured by works of art that Sotheby's either has in its possession or permits borrowers to possess. The Finance segment generally makes two types of secured loans: (1) advances secured by consigned property where the borrowers are contractually committed, in the near term, to sell the property through Sotheby's Agency segment (a “consignor advance”) and (2) general purpose term loans secured by property not presently intended for sale (a “term loan”).
11#
Consignor advances allow sellers to receive funds upon consignment for an auction or private sale that will typically occur up to one year in the future and normally have short-term maturities. Term loans allow Sotheby's to establish or enhance mutually beneficial relationships with borrowers and may generate future auction or private sale consignments and/or purchases. Term loans normally have initial maturities of up to two years and typically carry a variable market rate of interest.
As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, Notes Receivable (net) related to the Finance segment consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||
Consignor advances | $ | 30,291 | $ | 25,994 | $ | 71,091 | ||||||
Term loans | 743,749 | 618,447 | 523,279 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 774,040 | $ | 644,441 | $ | 594,370 | ||||||
In certain situations, term loans are also made to refinance client auction and private sale purchases. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Finance segment made $32.6 million and $34.6 million, respectively, of such loans. These loans are accounted for as non-cash transfers between Accounts Receivable (net) and Notes Receivable (net) and are, therefore, not reflected as the funding of Notes Receivable within Investing Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Upon repayment, the cash received in settlement of such loans is classified within Operating Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, such repayments totaled $16.4 million and $19.6 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, Notes Receivable (net) included $106.5 million, $90.4 million, and $87.9 million, respectively, of such loans.
Prior to 2014, the lending activities of the Finance segment were funded primarily by the operating cash flows of the Agency segment, with the ability to supplement those cash flows with revolving credit facility borrowings. In January 2014, in order to reduce the Finance segment's cost of capital and enhance returns, Sotheby's established a separate capital structure for the Finance segment through which client loans are predominantly funded with borrowings drawn from a dedicated revolving credit facility. The establishment of the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility in February 2014 has allowed management to debt fund a substantial portion of pre-existing loans and fund further growth of the loan portfolio. Cash balances are also used to fund a portion of the Finance segment loan portfolio, as appropriate. (See Note 6 for information related to the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility.)
The collection of secured loans can be adversely impacted by a decline in the art market in general or in the value of the particular collateral. In addition, in situations when there are competing claims on the collateral and/or when a borrower becomes subject to bankruptcy or insolvency laws, Sotheby’s ability to realize on its collateral may be limited or delayed.
Sotheby’s target loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio, which is defined as the principal loan amount divided by the low auction estimate of the collateral, is 50%, but loans are sometimes made with LTV ratios between 51% and 60% as the Finance segment credit facility permits borrowings on loans with an LTV of up to 60%. In rare circumstances, loans are also made at an initial LTV ratio higher than 60%. In addition, the LTV ratio of certain loans may increase above the 50% target due to decreases in the low auction estimates of the collateral. The revaluation of loan collateral is performed by Sotheby’s specialists on an annual basis or more frequently if there is a material change in circumstances related to the loan, the value of the collateral, the disposal plans for the collateral, or if an event of default occurs. Management believes that the LTV ratio is the critical credit quality indicator for Finance segment secured loans.
The table below provides the aggregate LTV ratio for the Finance segment loan portfolio as of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||
Finance segment secured loans | $ | 774,040 | $ | 644,441 | $ | 594,370 | ||||||
Low auction estimate of collateral | $ | 1,539,092 | $ | 1,349,094 | $ | 1,299,433 | ||||||
Aggregate LTV ratio | 50 | % | 48 | % | 46 | % | ||||||
12#
The table below provides the aggregate LTV ratio for Finance segment secured loans with an LTV ratio above 50% as of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||
Finance segment secured loans with an LTV ratio above 50% | $ | 441,246 | $ | 329,135 | $ | 294,956 | ||||||
Low auction estimate of collateral related to Finance segment secured loans with an LTV ratio above 50% | $ | 784,119 | $ | 556,662 | $ | 485,088 | ||||||
Aggregate LTV ratio of Finance segment secured loans with an LTV ratio above 50% | 56 | % | 59 | % | 61 | % | ||||||
The table below provides other credit quality information regarding Finance segment secured loans as of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||
Total secured loans | $ | 774,040 | $ | 644,441 | $ | 594,370 | ||||||
Loans past due | $ | 420 | $ | 22,409 | $ | 88,931 | ||||||
Loans more than 90 days past due | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14,630 | ||||||
Non-accrual loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Impaired loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses: | ||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses for impaired loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses based on historical data | 1,359 | 1,166 | 1,001 | |||||||||
Total allowance for credit losses - secured loans | $ | 1,359 | $ | 1,166 | $ | 1,001 | ||||||
Management considers a loan to be past due when principal payments are not paid in accordance with the stated terms of the loan. Sotheby's received a $0.2 million payment on the past due loan balance in July 2015 and intends to offer loan collateral at auction in the fourth quarter of 2015 to settle the remaining balance.
A non-accrual loan is a loan for which future Finance revenue is not recorded due to management’s determination that it is probable that future interest on the loan is not collectible. Any cash receipts subsequently received on non-accrual loans are first applied to reduce the recorded principal balance of the loan, with any proceeds in excess of the principal balance then applied to interest owed by the borrower. The recognition of Finance revenue may resume on a non-accrual loan if sufficient additional collateral is provided by the borrower or if management becomes aware of other circumstances that indicate that it is probable that the borrower will make future interest payments on the loan. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, there were no non-accrual loans outstanding.
A loan is considered to be impaired when management determines that it is probable that a portion of the principal and interest owed by the borrower will not be recovered after taking into account the estimated realizable value of the collateral securing the loan, as well as the ability of the borrower to repay any shortfall between the value of the collateral and the amount of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, Finance Revenue is no longer recognized and bad debt expense is recorded for any principal or accrued interest that is deemed uncollectible. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, there were no impaired loans outstanding.
During the period January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015, activity related to the Allowance for Credit Losses was as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Allowance for credit losses as of January 1, 2015 | $ | 1,166 | |
Change in loan loss provision | 193 | ||
Allowance for credit losses as of June 30, 2015 | $ | 1,359 | |
As of June 30, 2015, unfunded commitments to extend additional credit through Sotheby's Finance segment were $10.2 million.
13#
Notes Receivable (Agency Segment)—Sotheby’s is obligated under the terms of certain auction guarantees to advance a portion of the guaranteed amount prior to the auction. In addition, in certain limited situations, the Agency segment will also provide advances to consignors that are secured by property scheduled to be offered at auction in the near term. Such auction guarantee and Agency segment consignor advances are recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets within Notes Receivable (net). As of June 30, 2015, Agency segment consignor advances totaled $2.5 million and there were no auction guarantee advances outstanding. As of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, auction guarantee advances totaled $25 million and $5.5 million, respectively, and there were no Agency segment consignor advances outstanding. (See Note 10 for additional information related to auction guarantees.)
In the limited circumstances when the payment due date for an auction or private sale receivable is extended to a date that is beyond one year from the sale date, if the consignor does not provide Sotheby's matched payment terms, the receivable balance is reclassified from Accounts Receivable to Notes Receivable in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, Notes Receivable within the Agency segment included $22.6 million and $22.7 million, respectively, of amounts reclassified from Accounts Receivable against which Sotheby's held $3.7 million of collateral. As of June 30, 2014, there were no such Notes Receivable outstanding. These Notes Receivable are accounted for as non-cash transfers between Accounts Receivable (net) and Notes Receivable (net) and are, therefore, not reflected within Investing Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Upon repayment, the cash received in settlement of such Notes Receivable is classified within Operating Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Under certain circumstances, Sotheby's provides loans to certain art dealers to finance the purchase of works of art. In these situations, Sotheby's acquires a partial ownership interest or a security interest in the purchased property in addition to providing the loan. Upon the eventual sale of the property acquired, the loan is repaid. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, such loans totaled $4.4 million, $4.9 million, and $5.0 million, respectively. Sotheby's is no longer accruing interest with respect to one of these loans with a balance of $2.1 million, but management believes that this balance is collectible.
Notes Receivable (Other)—In the second quarter of 2013, Sotheby's sold its interest in an equity method investee for $4.3 million and, as a result, recognized a gain of $0.3 million. The sale price was funded by an upfront cash payment to Sotheby's of $0.8 million and the issuance of a $3.5 million unsecured loan. This loan matures in December 2018, has a variable market rate of interest, and requires monthly payments during the loan term. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014 the carrying value of this loan was approximately $2.6 million, $2.7 million, and $2.9 million, respectively.
6. Debt
Revolving Credit Facilities—Sotheby's and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries are parties to a credit agreement with an international syndicate of lenders led by General Electric Capital Corporation, which provides for separate dedicated revolving credit facilities for the Agency segment (the “Agency Credit Agreement”) and the Finance segment (the “Finance Credit Agreement”) (collectively, the “Credit Agreements”). On June 15, 2015, the Credit Agreements were amended to increase the commitments under the Finance Credit Agreement in order to support the continued growth of the Finance segment's loan portfolio and to extend the maturity date of the Credit Agreements by one year to August 22, 2020.
The Agency Credit Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving credit facility the proceeds of which may be used primarily for the working capital and other general corporate needs of the Agency segment. The Finance Credit Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving credit facility the proceeds of which may be used primarily for the working capital and other general corporate needs of the Finance segment, including the funding of client loans. The Credit Agreements allow Sotheby's to transfer the proceeds of borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities between the Agency and Finance segments.
The maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements, which is subject to a borrowing base, is approximately $1.335 billion, with $300 million committed to the Agency segment and $1.035 billion committed to the Finance segment, including a $485 million increase that was secured for the Finance segment in conjunction with the June 2015 amendment. The borrowing capacity of the Agency Credit Agreement includes a $50 million incremental revolving credit facility with higher advance rates against certain assets and higher commitment and borrowing costs (the "Incremental Facility"). As a result of the June 2015 amendment of the Credit Agreements, the Incremental Facility has a maturity date of August 22, 2016, which may be extended for an additional 365 days on an annual basis with the consent of the lenders who agree to extend their commitments under the Incremental Facility. Prior to the amendment, the maturity date of the Incremental Facility was August 21, 2015.
14#
The Credit Agreements have a sub-limit of $400 million for borrowings in the U.K. and Hong Kong, with up to $50 million available for foreign borrowings under the Agency Credit Agreement and up to $350 million available for foreign borrowings under the Finance Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreements also include an accordion feature, which allows Sotheby’s to seek an increase to the combined borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements until February 23, 2020 by an amount not to exceed $150 million in the aggregate. Though new commitments would need to be obtained, the uncommitted accordion feature permits Sotheby’s to seek an increase to the aggregate commitments of either or both of the Agency and Finance credit facilities under an expedited arrangement process.
The borrowing base under the Agency Credit Agreement is determined by a calculation that is primarily based upon a percentage of the carrying values of certain auction guarantee advances, a percentage of the carrying value of certain inventory, a percentage of the carrying value of certain extended payment term receivables arising from auction or private sale transactions, and the fair value of certain of Sotheby's trademarks. The borrowing base under the Finance Credit Agreement is determined by a calculation that is primarily based upon a percentage of the carrying values of certain loans in the Finance segment loan portfolio and the fair value of certain of Sotheby's trademarks. The borrowing base of the Incremental Facility is determined by a calculation that is based on a percentage of the carrying value of certain inventory and the fair value of certain of Sotheby's trademarks.
The obligations under the Credit Agreements are cross-guaranteed and cross-collateralized. Domestic borrowers are jointly and severally liable for all obligations under the Credit Agreements and, subject to certain limitations, borrowers in the U.K. and Sotheby's Hong Kong Limited, are jointly and severally liable for all obligations of the foreign borrowers under the Credit Agreements. In addition, the obligations of the borrowers under the Credit Agreements are guaranteed by certain of their subsidiaries. Sotheby's obligations under the Credit Agreements are secured by liens on all or substantially all of the personal property of the entities that are borrowers and guarantors under the Credit Agreements.
The Credit Agreements contain certain customary affirmative and negative covenants including, but not limited to, limitations on capital expenditures, a $600 million limitation on net outstanding auction guarantees (i.e., auction guarantees less the impact of related risk and reward sharing arrangements), and limitations on the use of proceeds from borrowings under the Credit Agreements. However, the Credit Agreements do not limit dividend payments and Common Stock repurchases provided that, both before and after giving effect thereto: (i) there are no events of default, (ii) the aggregate available borrowing capacity equals or exceeds $100 million, and (iii) the Liquidity Amount, as defined in the Credit Agreements, equals or exceeds $200 million. The Credit Agreements also contain certain financial covenants, which are only applicable during certain defined compliance periods. These financial covenants were not applicable for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2015.
Since August 2009, Sotheby’s has incurred aggregate fees of approximately $21.2 million in conjunction with the establishment of and subsequent amendments to its credit agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation. These fees are being amortized on a straight-line basis through the August 22, 2020 maturity date of the Credit Agreements.
15#
The following tables summarize information relevant to the Credit Agreements as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
As of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 300,000 | $ | 1,035,000 | $ | 1,335,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 221,812 | $ | 622,849 | $ | 844,661 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 593,000 | $ | 593,000 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 221,812 | $ | 29,849 | $ | 251,661 | ||||||
Average Borrowings Outstanding: | ||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2015 | $ | — | $ | 538,868 | $ | 538,868 | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2015 | $ | — | $ | 506,052 | $ | 506,052 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs: | ||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2015 | $ | 751 | $ | 3,874 | $ | 4,625 | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2015 | $ | 1,457 | $ | 7,262 | $ | 8,719 | ||||||
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 300,000 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 850,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 237,830 | $ | 519,255 | $ | 757,085 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 445,000 | $ | 445,000 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 237,830 | $ | 74,255 | $ | 312,085 | ||||||
Average borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 306,448 | $ | 306,448 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs | $ | 2,240 | $ | 8,740 | $ | 10,980 | ||||||
As of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 150,000 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 600,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 61,647 | $ | 451,057 | $ | 512,704 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 345,000 | $ | 345,000 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 61,647 | $ | 105,000 | $ | 166,647 | ||||||
Average Borrowings Outstanding: | ||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2014 | $ | — | $ | 284,176 | $ | 284,176 | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2014 | $ | — | $ | 188,591 | $ | 188,591 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs: | ||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2014 | $ | 371 | $ | 2,024 | $ | 2,395 | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2014 | $ | 968 | $ | 2,734 | $ | 3,702 | ||||||
(a) In August 2014, the Credit Agreements were amended and restated to, among other things, increase the maximum borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements from $600 million to $850 million. In June 2015, the Credit Agreements were amended to, among other things, increase the maximum borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements from $850 million to approximately $1.335 billion.
(b) The available borrowing capacity is calculated as the borrowing base less borrowings outstanding.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, borrowing costs related to the Finance Credit Agreement include interest of $3.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively, and fee amortization of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, borrowing costs related to the Finance Credit Agreement include interest of $6.8 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and fee amortization of $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, borrowing costs related to the Finance Credit Agreement include interest of $7.7 million and fee amortization of $1 million. Such borrowing costs are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements as the Cost of Finance Revenues. The weighted average cost of borrowing related to the Finance Credit Agreement was approximately 2.9% for all periods presented.
16#
Borrowing costs related to the Agency Credit Agreement, which include interest and fee amortization, are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements as Interest Expense.
Long-Term Debt—As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, Long-Term Debt consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||
York Property Mortgage, net of unamortized discount of $0, $1,782, and $3,564 | $ | 218,609 | $ | 218,728 | $ | 218,761 | ||||||
2022 Senior Notes | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||
Less current portion: | ||||||||||||
York Property Mortgage | (6,542 | ) | (218,728 | ) | (3,730 | ) | ||||||
Total Long-Term Debt, net | $ | 512,067 | $ | 300,000 | $ | 515,031 | ||||||
(See the captioned sections below for information related to the York Property Mortgage and the 2022 Senior Notes.)
York Property Mortgage—On February 6, 2009, Sotheby's purchased the land and building located at 1334 York Avenue, New York, New York (the “York Property”) from RFR Holding Corp. (“RFR”) for a purchase price of $370 million. The York Property is home to Sotheby's sole North American auction salesroom and principal North American exhibition space, including S|2, Sotheby's private sale exhibition gallery. The York Property is also home to the U.S. operations of the Finance segment, as well as Sotheby's corporate offices.
Sotheby's financed the $370 million purchase price through an initial $50 million cash payment made in conjunction with the signing of the related purchase and sale agreement on January 11, 2008, an $85 million cash payment made when the purchase was consummated on February 6, 2009, and the assumption of a $235 million mortgage that carried an initial annual rate of interest of approximately 5.6% (the "York Property Mortgage"). The York Property Mortgage was due to mature on July 1, 2035, but had an optional pre-payment date of July 1, 2015, after which the annual rate of interest was scheduled to increase to 10.6%. As of June 30, 2015, the carrying value and fair value of York Property Mortgage was approximately $218.6 million.
On July 1, 2015, Sotheby's entered into a seven-year, $325 million mortgage loan (the "New Mortgage") to refinance the York Property Mortgage. After the repayment of the York Property Mortgage and the funding of all closing costs, reserves, and expenses, Sotheby's received net cash proceeds of approximately $98 million. The interest rate for the New Mortgage is the one-month LIBOR rate (the "LIBOR rate") plus a spread of 2.25%. The New Mortgage amortizes based on a 25-year mortgage-style amortization schedule.
In connection with the New Mortgage, Sotheby's entered into interest rate protection agreements secured by the York Property, consisting of a two-year swap and a five-year collar, both of which have a notional amount equal to the applicable principal balance of the New Mortgage and have an identical amortization schedule. These interest rate protection agreements effectively hedge the LIBOR rate on the entire outstanding principal balance of the New Mortgage at a rate equal to 0.877% per annum for the first two years and no more than 3.75% per annum for the remainder of the seven-year term. Therefore, after taking into account the interest rate protection agreements, the interest rate for the first two years of the New Mortgage will be approximately 3.13% per annum and no more than 6% per annum for the remainder of the seven-year term.
17#
The loan agreement governing the New Mortgage contains the following financial covenants, which are subject to additional terms and conditions as provided in the underlying loan agreement:
• | As of July 1, 2020, the LTV ratio may not exceed 65% (the “Maximum LTV”) based on the then-outstanding principal balance of the New Mortgage. If the LTV ratio exceeds the Maximum LTV, Sotheby's may, at its option, post cash or a letter of credit or pay down the New Mortgage without any prepayment penalty or premium, in an amount that will cause the LTV ratio not to exceed the Maximum LTV. |
• | At all times during the term of the New Mortgage, the Debt Yield (as defined in the loan agreement governing the New Mortgage) will not be less than 8.5% (the “Minimum Debt Yield”). If the Debt Yield falls below the Minimum Debt Yield, Sotheby's has the option to post cash or a letter of credit or prepay the New Mortgage without any prepayment penalty or premium, in an amount that will cause the Debt Yield to exceed the Minimum Debt Yield. |
• | If Sotheby’s corporate credit rating from Standard & Poor’s Rating Services is downgraded to “BB-”, Sotheby's must establish a cash management account (the "Cash Management Account") under the control of the lender, whereby any excess cash remaining after the monthly payment of debt service, insurance, and taxes would remain in the account. If the rating is downgraded to “B+” or “B”, Sotheby's must deposit a certain amount of debt service into the Cash Management Account. If the rating is downgraded to lower than “B”, Sotheby's must make principal payments on the New Mortgage such that the LTV ratio does not exceed 65%. |
• | At all times during the term of the New Mortgage, Sotheby’s will, subject to a cure period, maintain a net worth of at least $425 million. If, however, Sotheby's fails to maintain the required minimum net worth, it will have 60 days to cure such default. |
As a result of the refinancing of the York Property Mortgage, $212.7 million of its $218.6 million carrying value as of June 30, 2015 is classified within Long-Term Debt on Sotheby's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The $6.5 million recorded within current liabilities represents the principal payments due on the New Mortgage within one year from the June 30, 2015 balance sheet date.
The York Property and the related mortgage are held by 1334 York, LLC, a separate legal entity of Sotheby's that maintains its own books and records and whose results are ultimately consolidated into Sotheby's financial statements. The assets of 1334 York, LLC are not available to satisfy the obligations of other Sotheby's affiliates or any other entity.
2022 Senior Notes—On September 27, 2012, Sotheby's issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% Senior Notes, due October 1, 2022 (the "2022 Senior Notes"). The 2022 Senior Notes were offered only to qualified institutional buyers in accordance with Rule 144A and to non-U.S. Persons under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Holders of the 2022 Senior Notes do not have registration rights, and the 2022 Senior Notes have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act.
The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2022 Senior Notes were approximately $293.7 million, after deducting fees paid to the initial purchasers, and were principally used to retire previously outstanding debt.
The 2022 Senior Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by certain of Sotheby's existing and future domestic subsidiaries to the extent and on the same basis that such subsidiaries guarantee borrowings under the Credit Agreements. Interest on the 2022 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in cash on April 1 and October 1 of each year.
The 2022 Senior Notes are redeemable by Sotheby's, in whole or in part, on or after October 1, 2017, at specified redemption prices set forth in the underlying indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. Prior to October 1, 2017, the 2022 Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date, plus a premium equal to the greater of 1% of the principal amount of the 2022 Senior Notes and a make-whole premium (as defined in the underlying indenture).
In addition, at any time prior to October 1, 2015, Sotheby's may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Senior Notes with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings at the redemption price of 105.25% plus accrued and unpaid interest. The 2022 Senior Notes are not callable by holders unless Sotheby's is in default under the terms of the underlying indenture.
As of June 30, 2015, the $300 million principal amount of 2022 Senior Notes had a fair value of approximately $294 million based on a broker quoted price derived via a pricing model using observable and unobservable inputs. As such, this fair value measurement is considered to be a Level 3 fair value measurement in the fair value hierarchy as per Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements ("ASC 820").
18#
Future Principal and Interest Payments—The aggregate future payments due under the York Property Mortgage and the 2022 Senior Notes during the five-year period after the June 30, 2015 balance sheet date are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
July 2015 to June 2016 | $ | 28,586 | |
July 2016 to June 2017 | $ | 29,867 | |
July 2017 to June 2018 | $ | 32,084 | |
July 2018 to June 2019 | $ | 32,110 | |
July 2019 to June 2020 | $ | 32,120 | |
Interest Expense—For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, Interest Expense consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Agency Credit Agreement: | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of amendment and arrangement fees | $ | 314 | $ | 181 | $ | 629 | $ | 505 | ||||||||
Commitment fees | 437 | 190 | 828 | 463 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total | 751 | 371 | 1,457 | 968 | ||||||||||||
York Property Mortgage | 4,064 | 4,115 | 8,075 | 8,175 | ||||||||||||
2022 Senior Notes | 4,098 | 4,098 | 8,196 | 8,196 | ||||||||||||
Other interest expense | 161 | 184 | 7 | 212 | ||||||||||||
Total Interest Expense | $ | 9,074 | $ | 8,768 | $ | 17,735 | $ | 17,551 | ||||||||
In the table above, Interest Expense related to the York Property Mortgage and the 2022 Senior Notes includes the amortization of debt issuance costs and, when applicable, the amortization of discount.
7. Investment in RM Sotheby's
On February 18, 2015, Sotheby's acquired a 25% ownership interest in RM Auctions, an auction house for investment-quality automobiles, for $30.7 million. Following this investment, RM Auctions is now known as RM Sotheby's. In addition to the initial 25% ownership interest, Sotheby’s has governance participation and a comprehensive partnership agreement to work together to drive growth in the business. Over time, Sotheby’s will have opportunities to increase its ownership stake as the partnership evolves and grows. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, Sotheby's results include $1 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of equity earnings related to RM Sotheby's.
8. Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Sotheby’s sponsors a defined benefit pension plan covering U.K. employees who entered service prior to April 1, 2004 (the “U.K. Pension Plan”). The table below summarizes the components of the net pension cost (benefit) related to the U.K. Pension Plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 1,126 | $ | 1,149 | $ | 2,241 | $ | 2,279 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 3,237 | 3,993 | 6,442 | 7,920 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (5,053 | ) | (5,918 | ) | (10,057 | ) | (11,737 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of previously unrecognized net pension losses | 993 | 599 | 1,977 | 1,188 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 91 | — | 181 | — | ||||||||||||
Net pension cost (benefit) | $ | 394 | $ | (177 | ) | $ | 784 | $ | (350 | ) | ||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2015, Sotheby's contributed $1.2 million to the U.K. Pension Plan, and total contributions for the year ending December 31, 2015 are expected to be approximately $2.2 million.
19#
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Compensation Arrangements—Sotheby’s has compensation arrangements with certain senior employees, which expire at various points between August 31, 2015 and March 31, 2020. Such arrangements may provide, among other benefits, for minimum salary levels and for compensation under Sotheby's incentive compensation programs that is payable only if specified Company and individual goals are attained. Additionally, under certain circumstances, certain of these arrangements provide annual share-based payments, severance payments, and other cash compensation. The aggregate remaining commitment for salaries and other cash compensation related to these compensation arrangements, excluding any participation in Sotheby’s incentive compensation programs, was approximately $27.4 million as of June 30, 2015.
Legal Actions—Sotheby’s becomes involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to the ordinary course of its business, including the matters described below. Management is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes in these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable or reasonably possible losses. A determination of the amount of losses, if any, to be recorded or disclosed as a result of these contingencies is based on a careful analysis of each individual exposure with, in some cases, the assistance of outside legal counsel. The amount of losses recorded or disclosed for such contingencies may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or a change in settlement strategy. Management does not believe that the outcome of any of these pending claims or proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on Sotheby’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows.
Estate of Robert Graham, et al. v. Sotheby's, Inc. is a purported class action commenced in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in October 2011 on behalf of U.S. artists (and their estates) whose artworks were sold by Sotheby's in the State of California or at auction by California sellers and for which a royalty was allegedly due under the California Resale Royalties Act (the “Resale Royalties Act”). Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, punitive damages and injunctive relief for alleged violations of the Resale Royalties Act and the California Unfair Competition Law. In January 2012, Sotheby’s filed a motion to dismiss the action on the grounds, among others, that the Resale Royalties Act violates the U.S. Constitution and is preempted by the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976. In February 2012, the plaintiffs filed their response to Sotheby's motion to dismiss. The court heard oral arguments on the motion to dismiss on March 12, 2012. On May 17, 2012, the court issued an order dismissing the action on the ground that the Resale Royalties Act violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs appealed this ruling. On May 5, 2015, an en banc panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision affirming the lower court decision that the Resale Royalties Act was unconstitutional insofar as it sought to apply to sales outside of the state of California.
(See Note 5 for information related to unfunded commitments to extend additional credit through Sotheby's Finance segment. See Note 6 for information related to Sotheby's debt commitments. See Note 10 for information related to Sotheby's auction guarantees. See Note 17 for information related to Sotheby's income tax contingencies.)
20#
10. Auction Guarantees
From time-to-time in the ordinary course of its business, Sotheby’s will guarantee to a consignor a minimum sale price in connection with the sale of property at auction (an “auction guarantee”). Sotheby’s is generally entitled to a share of the excess proceeds (the “overage”) if the property under the auction guarantee sells above the guaranteed price. In the event that the property sells for less than the guaranteed price, Sotheby’s must perform under the auction guarantee by funding the difference between the sale price at auction and the amount of the auction guarantee. If the property does not sell, the amount of the auction guarantee must be paid, but Sotheby’s has the right to recover such amount through the future sale of the property. Depending on the mix of items subject to a guarantee, in advance of peak selling seasons, a small number of guaranteed items may represent a substantial portion of the aggregate amount of outstanding auction guarantees.
In situations when the guaranteed property does not sell, the property is recorded as Inventory on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at the lower of cost (i.e., the amount paid under the auction guarantee) or management’s estimate of the property's net realizable value (i.e., the expected sale price upon disposition). The sale proceeds ultimately realized by Sotheby’s in these situations may equal, exceed, or be less than the amount recorded as Inventory.
Sotheby’s may reduce its financial exposure under auction guarantees through contractual risk and reward sharing arrangements. Such auction guarantee risk and reward sharing arrangements include irrevocable bids and partner sharing arrangements. An irrevocable bid is an arrangement under which a counterparty commits to bid a predetermined price on the guaranteed property. If the irrevocable bid is the winning bid, the counterparty purchases the property at the predetermined price plus the applicable buyer’s premium, which is the same amount that any other successful bidder would pay at that price. If the irrevocable bid is not the winning bid, the counterparty is generally entitled to receive a share of the auction commission earned on the sale and/or a share of any overage. In a partner sharing arrangement, a counterparty commits to fund: (i) a share of the difference between the sale price at auction and the amount of the auction guarantee if the property sells for less than the minimum guaranteed price or (ii) a share of the minimum guaranteed price if the property does not sell while taking ownership of a proportionate share of the unsold property. In exchange for accepting a share of the financial exposure under the auction guarantee, the counterparty in a partner sharing arrangement is generally entitled to receive a share of the auction commission earned if the property sells and/or a share of any overage.
The counterparties to Sotheby's auction guarantee risk and reward sharing arrangements are typically major international art dealers or major art collectors. Sotheby’s could be exposed to losses in the event any of these counterparties do not perform according to the terms of these contractual arrangements.
Although irrevocable bid and partner sharing arrangements may be used to reduce the risk associated with auction guarantees, Sotheby's may also enter into auction guarantees without securing such arrangements. In these circumstances, Sotheby's could be exposed to auction guarantee losses and/or deterioration in auction commission margins if the underlying property fails to sell at the minimum guaranteed price. Furthermore, in such situations, Sotheby's liquidity could be reduced.
Sotheby's credit agreement has a covenant that imposes a $600 million limitation on net outstanding auction guarantees (i.e., auction guarantees less the impact of related risk and reward sharing arrangements). In addition to compliance with this covenant, Sotheby's use of auction guarantees and related risk and reward sharing arrangements is also subject to management and, in some cases, Board of Directors, approval.
As of June 30, 2015, Sotheby’s had outstanding auction guarantees totaling $16.2 million. Sotheby's financial exposure under these auction guarantees is reduced by irrevocable bids totaling $11.9 million. Each of these auction guarantees has a minimum guaranteed price that is within the range of the pre-sale auction estimates for the underlying property. A substantial portion of the property related to these auction guarantees was offered at an auction in July 2015 with the remainder scheduled to be offered in the fourth quarter of 2015.
Sotheby's is obligated under the terms of certain auction guarantees to advance all or a portion of the guaranteed amount prior to auction. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, the carrying value of the liability representing the estimated fair value of Sotheby’s obligation to perform under its auction guarantees totaled $0.5 million, $5.3 million, and $1.5 million, respectively, and is recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets within Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities.
As of July 30, 2015, Sotheby's had outstanding auction guarantees totaling $3.8 million and, as of that date, Sotheby's financial exposure was reduced by risk and reward sharing arrangements totaling $3.3 million. Each of the auction guarantees outstanding as of July 30, 2015 had a minimum guaranteed price that was within the range of the pre-sale auction estimates for the underlying property. All of the property related to these auction guarantees is being offered at auctions in the fourth quarter of 2015. As of July 30, 2015, $0.2 million of the guaranteed amount had been advanced by Sotheby's.
21#
11. Shareholders' Equity and Dividends
Special Dividend and Common Stock Repurchase Program—In January 2014, Sotheby's completed a review of its capital allocation and financial policies and as a result: (i) established separate capital structures and financial policies for its Agency and Finance segments, (ii) declared a special dividend of $300 million ($4.34 per share), and (iii) authorized a 5-year, $150 million Common Stock repurchase program principally to offset the annual vesting of employee share-based payments.
The $300 million special dividend was paid on March 17, 2014 and was funded principally by the repatriation of $250 million of cash from Sotheby’s foreign subsidiaries, with the remaining $50 million funded by existing domestic cash balances. In conjunction with this special dividend, dividend equivalents of approximately $11 million were accrued on share-based payments to Sotheby's employees and charged against retained earnings, of which approximately $2 million and $4 million was paid in March 2015 and March 2014, respectively. (See Note 12 for information related to Sotheby's share-based payment programs.)
In conjunction with the Common Stock repurchase program, Sotheby's repurchased 558,171 shares of its Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $25 million ($44.79 per share) pursuant to an accelerated stock buyback agreement that was concluded in March 2014.
Quarterly Cash Dividends—On February 26, 2015, Sotheby's Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share (approximately $6.9 million) that was paid on March 16, 2015 to shareholders of record as of March 9, 2015. On May 7, 2015, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share (approximately $6.9 million) that was paid on June 15, 2015 to shareholders of record as of June 1, 2015. On August 6, 2015, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share (approximately $6.9 million) payable on September 15, 2015 to shareholders of record as of September 1, 2015. On February 27, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share (approximately $6.9 million) that was paid on March 17, 2014 to shareholders of record as of March 10, 2014. On May 6, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share (approximately $6.9 million) that was paid on June 16, 2014 to shareholders of record as of June 2, 2014.
Subsequent Event—On August 6, 2015, Sotheby’s Board of Directors approved an increase of $125 million to Sotheby's remaining share repurchase authorization of $125 million, resulting in a total share repurchase authorization of $250 million. The Board of Directors has concluded that this share repurchase program, which is expected to be funded from existing cash balances, provides a balance between preserving capital for growth, downside risk protection, and returning available capital to shareholders. Sotheby’s intends to repurchase $125 million of its Common Stock from shareholders in the near term via an Accelerated Share Repurchase (“ASR”) Program. Management expects that the balance of the share repurchase program will be executed in the next 12 months to 18 months, via open market transactions and/or additional ASR Programs.
12. Share-Based Payments
Share-based payments to employees include performance-based stock unit awards, market-based stock unit awards, restricted stock units, restricted stock shares, and stock options. A description of each of these share-based payments is provided below. Compensation expense related to share-based payments is generally recorded as a component of Salaries and Related Costs in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements. However, share-based payment expense of $2 million recognized in the first quarter of 2015 related to fully vested restricted stock units granted to Thomas S. Smith, Jr. upon the commencement of his employment as Sotheby's President and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") is reported within CEO Separation and Transition Costs (see Note 13).
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, compensation expense related to share-based payments, including the $2 million charge recognized and classified within CEO Separation and Transition Costs in the first quarter of 2015, was as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Pre-Tax | $ | 9,582 | $ | 6,648 | $ | 17,235 | $ | 12,895 | ||||||||
After-Tax | $ | 6,623 | $ | 4,503 | $ | 11,453 | $ | 8,655 | ||||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, Sotheby's recognized $1.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, of excess tax benefits related to share-based payment arrangements. These tax benefits represent the amount by which the tax deduction resulting from the exercise or vesting of share-based payments exceeded the tax benefit initially recognized in Sotheby's financial statements upon the amortization of compensation expense for these awards. Such excess tax benefits are recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as an increase to Additional Paid-in Capital and are classified within Financing Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
22#
As of June 30, 2015, unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of share-based payments was $43.9 million. This compensation expense is expected to be amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.7 years. Sotheby’s does not capitalize any compensation expense related to share-based payments to employees.
Sotheby's Restricted Stock Unit Plan—Sotheby's Second Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Plan (the “Restricted Stock Unit Plan”) provides for the issuance of Restricted Stock Units (“RSU's”) to employees, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”). In making awards under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan, the Compensation Committee takes into account the nature of the services rendered by employees, their present and potential future contributions to Sotheby's success, and such other factors as the Compensation Committee in its discretion deems relevant.
RSU's issued under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan generally vest evenly over a three-year service period. Prior to vesting, holders of RSU's do not have voting rights, but are entitled to receive dividend equivalents. Dividend equivalents paid to holders of unvested RSU's are not forfeitable. RSU's may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered until they vest.
Performance Share Units (or “PSU's”) are RSU's that generally vest over three or four years, subject to the achievement of certain profitability targets. Prior to vesting, holders of PSU's do not have voting rights and are not entitled to receive dividends or dividend equivalents. Dividend equivalents are generally credited to holders of PSU's and are only paid for the portion of PSU's that vest and become shares of Common Stock. PSU's may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered until they vest.
As discussed in more detail below, in the first quarter of 2015, Sotheby's granted Thomas S. Smith, Jr., its new President and CEO, PSU's under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan with a single vesting opportunity after a five-year service period contingent upon the achievement of pre-determined levels of Sotheby's stock price appreciation. These PSU's do not have any voting or dividend equivalent rights. In addition, as discussed in more detail below under "CEO Share-Based Payment Awards," in the first quarter of 2015, Sotheby's also granted Mr. Smith 158,638 restricted stock shares and 47,070 fully vested RSU's outside of the Restricted Stock Unit Plan.
For the six months ended June 30, 2015, in addition to the PSU's granted to Mr. Smith, Sotheby's issued share-based payment awards under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan with a total fair value of $28.7 million, as follows:
• | 384,664 PSU's with a fair value of $16.9 million and a single vesting opportunity after a three-year service period, including: |
◦ | 304,882 PSU's with a fair value of $13.4 million, related almost entirely to Sotheby's incentive compensation programs, and |
◦ | 79,782 PSU's with a fair value of $3.5 million issued to William F. Ruprecht, Sotheby's former President and CEO. In accordance with the terms of his amended employment agreement, upon the termination of his employment on March 31, 2015, Mr. Ruprecht forfeited 60,109 PSU's from this award. Accordingly, Mr. Ruprecht ultimately retained 19,673 PSU's with a fair value of $0.9 million. |
• | 268,865 RSU's with annual vesting over a three-year service period and a fair value of $11.8 million, related almost entirely to Sotheby's incentive compensation programs. |
23#
CEO Share-Based Payment Awards—In the first quarter of 2015, share-based payment awards with a fair value of $16.5 million were granted to Thomas S. Smith, Jr., Sotheby's new President and CEO, upon the commencement of his employment on March 31, 2015. These awards consist of the following:
• | An inducement award of 158,638 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $6.5 million, with periodic vesting opportunities between March 4, 2016 and September 1, 2017, which substantially correspond to the times when forfeited opportunities at Mr. Smith's previous employer would otherwise have become eligible to vest. These restricted stock shares were not issued pursuant to the Restricted Stock Unit Plan and have not been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These shares have voting rights and a non-forfeitable right to dividends. |
• | An inducement award of 47,070 fully vested RSU's with a fair value of $2 million awarded to Mr. Smith to compensate him for a portion of the annual bonus that he would have received from his previous employer. The Common Stock shares associated with this award will be distributed in three approximately equal installments on the third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. These RSU's were not issued pursuant to the Restricted Stock Unit Plan and have not been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These RSU's will be credited with dividend equivalents based on the dividends paid on the underlying number of shares of Common Stock. |
• | An award of 94,140 PSU's under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan with a fair value of $8 million and with a single vesting opportunity after a five-year service period contingent upon the achievement of pre-determined levels of Sotheby's stock price appreciation. This award provides opportunities to vest in incremental PSU's up to 350% of the initial award, such that the maximum number of shares that may be payable with respect to this award is 329,490 shares. These PSU's do not have a right to earn dividend equivalents. |
Summary of Outstanding Share-Based Payment Awards—For the six months ended June 30, 2015, changes to the number of outstanding RSU’s, PSU’s, and Restricted Stock shares were as follows (shares in thousands):
Number of RSU’s, PSU’s, and Restricted Stock Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2015 | 1,806 | $ | 40.32 | |||
Granted | 953 | 47.36 | ||||
Vested | (549 | ) | 39.31 | |||
Canceled | (190 | ) | 42.48 | |||
Outstanding at June 30, 2015 | 2,020 | $ | 43.72 | |||
As of June 30, 2015, 3.2 million units were available for future awards pursuant to the Restricted Stock Unit Plan. The aggregate fair value of RSU’s and PSU's that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $22.9 million and $28.1 million, respectively, based on the closing price of Sotheby's Common Stock on the dates the shares vested.
Stock Options—Stock options issued pursuant to the Sotheby's 1997 Stock Option Plan are exercisable into authorized, but unissued shares of Sotheby's Common Stock. Stock options vest evenly over four years and expire ten years after the date of grant. As of June 30, 2015, 104,100 shares of Common Stock were available for the issuance of stock options under the Stock Option Plan. As of June 30, 2015, 50,000 stock options were outstanding and exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $22.11 per share, a weighted average remaining contractual term of 4.6 years, and an aggregate intrinsic value of $1.2 million.
No stock options were exercised or granted during the six months ended June 30, 2015. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $1.2 million, the cash proceeds received as a result of these exercises was $1 million, and the associated excess tax benefit recognized was $0.3 million.
13. CEO Separation and Transition Costs
In the first quarter of 2015, Sotheby's recognized $4.2 million in costs associated with the hiring of Thomas S. Smith, Jr. as its President and Chief Executive Officer which are classified within CEO Separation and Transition Costs. These costs principally relate to compensation of $3.1 million owed to Mr. Smith to replace incentive compensation that he expected to receive from his previous employer, consisting of a fully vested restricted stock unit award with a fair value of $2 million granted on March 31, 2015 and a $1.1 million cash payment due in September 2015. There is no required service period associated with this compensation. CEO Separation and Transition Costs also include approximately $1.1 million in recruitment and other professional fees associated with the CEO hiring process.
24#
14. Restructuring Charges
On July 16, 2014, Sotheby's Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan (the "2014 Restructuring Plan") principally impacting Sotheby's operations in the United States and the U.K. The 2014 Restructuring Plan resulted in Restructuring Charges (net) of approximately $14.2 million in 2014, consisting of $13.9 million in employee termination benefits recognized in the second half of 2014 and approximately $0.3 million of lease exit costs recognized in the fourth quarter of 2014. Substantially all of the headcount reductions resulting from the 2014 Restructuring Plan have been completed.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, Sotheby's recognized benefits in Restructuring Charges (net) of $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, related to adjustments to the accrual for employee termination benefits. As of June 30, 2015, Sotheby's has made payments of approximately $9.6 million related to the 2014 Restructuring Plan, and the related accrued liability has been reduced by $0.9 million as a result of foreign currency exchange rate changes. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2015, the remaining accrued liability related to the 2014 Restructuring Plan recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets within Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities was $2.8 million. This liability is expected to be settled through cash payments to be made in the third quarter of 2015.
15. Special Charges
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, Sotheby's recognized special charges of $18.6 million and $24.3 million, respectively, related to third party advisory, legal, and other professional service fees directly associated with issues related to shareholder activism, the resulting proxy contest with Third Point LLC ("Third Point"), and the litigation concerning Sotheby's former shareholder rights plan and the change in control provision in its credit agreement. Included in these amounts is $10 million for the reimbursement by Sotheby's of Third Point's documented, out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the proxy contest and the litigation concerning Sotheby's former shareholder rights plan. This reimbursement was part of a support agreement Sotheby's entered into with Third Point, Daniel S. Loeb, Olivier Reza, Harry J. Wilson and other entities affiliated with Third Point (together with Third Point, the “Third Point Entities”) on May 4, 2014 pursuant to which Sotheby's and Third Point settled the previously pending proxy contest for the election of directors (the "Support Agreement"). Pursuant to the Support Agreement, Mr. Loeb, Mr. Reza and Mr. Wilson (the “Third Point Nominees”) were appointed to Sotheby's Board of Directors. The Support Agreement also contains various other terms and provisions, including with respect to standstill and voting commitments entered into by Third Point, Third Point's withdrawal of the litigation concerning Sotheby's former shareholder rights plan, and the accelerated expiration of Sotheby's former shareholder rights plan.
25#
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following is a summary of the changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 | Foreign Currency Items | Defined Benefit Pension Items | Total | |||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2015 | $ | (54,681 | ) | $ | (40,496 | ) | $ | (95,177 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 20,079 | (2,526 | ) | 17,553 | ||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | — | 867 | 867 | |||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) | 20,079 | (1,659 | ) | 18,420 | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2015 | $ | (34,602 | ) | $ | (42,155 | ) | $ | (76,757 | ) | |||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 | Foreign Currency Items | Defined Benefit Pension Items | Total | |||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2014 | $ | 2,572 | $ | (38,027 | ) | $ | (35,455 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 4,880 | (851 | ) | 4,029 | ||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | — | 479 | 479 | |||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) | 4,880 | (372 | ) | 4,508 | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2014 | $ | 7,452 | $ | (38,399 | ) | $ | (30,947 | ) | ||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 | Foreign Currency Items | Defined Benefit Pension Items | Total | |||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2015 | $ | (33,223 | ) | $ | (43,543 | ) | $ | (76,766 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (1,379 | ) | (337 | ) | (1,716 | ) | ||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | — | 1,725 | 1,725 | |||||||||
Net other comprehensive (loss) income | (1,379 | ) | 1,388 | 9 | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2015 | $ | (34,602 | ) | $ | (42,155 | ) | $ | (76,757 | ) | |||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 | Foreign Currency Items | Defined Benefit Pension Items | Total | |||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2014 | $ | (1,352 | ) | $ | (38,101 | ) | $ | (39,453 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 6,746 | (1,249 | ) | 5,497 | ||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | 2,058 | 951 | 3,009 | |||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) | 8,804 | (298 | ) | 8,506 | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2014 | $ | 7,452 | $ | (38,399 | ) | $ | (30,947 | ) | ||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) reflects the change in the foreign currency translation adjustment account during the period, including the change in the foreign currency translation adjustment account related to the U.K. Pension Plan. Such amounts are reported on a cumulative basis in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, $0.9 million and $1.7 million (respectively, net of taxes) was reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and recorded on a pre-tax basis to Salaries and Related Costs in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements as a result of the amortization of previously unrecognized U.K. Pension Plan losses and prior service costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, $0.5 million and $1 million (respectively, net of taxes) was reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and recorded on a pre-tax basis to Salaries and Related Costs in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements as a result of the amortization of previously unrecognized U.K. Pension Plan losses. (See Note 8 for information related to the U.K. Pension Plan.)
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, $2.1 million was reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss to Other Expense in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements as a result of the cumulative translation adjustment that was recognized upon the liquidation of a foreign subsidiary.
26#
17. Uncertain Tax Positions
As of June 30, 2015, Sotheby’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, was $20.5 million, representing a net decrease of $2.3 million when compared to the liability of $22.8 million as of December 31, 2014. This net decrease is primarily the result of both the expiration of the statute of limitations for certain tax years and the closing of tax audits for certain tax years, partially offset by the accrual of tax reserves related to transfer pricing. As of June 30, 2014, Sotheby’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, was $23.9 million. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect Sotheby’s effective tax rate was $12.7 million, $12.3 million, and $12.5 million, respectively. Sotheby’s believes it is reasonably possible that a decrease of $4.7 million in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits can occur within 12 months of the June 30, 2015 balance sheet date as a result of the expiration of statutes of limitations and the expected settlements of ongoing tax audits.
Sotheby’s is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions and, as a result, is subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. Sotheby’s is currently under examination by various U.S. state and foreign taxing authorities. The earliest open tax year for the major jurisdictions in which Sotheby's does business, which include the U.S. (including various state and local jurisdictions), the U.K., and Hong Kong, is 2007.
Sotheby’s recognizes interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of Income Tax Expense. The accrual for such interest and penalties decreased by $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
Sotheby’s policy is to record interest expense related to sales, value added and other non-income based taxes as Interest Expense in its Condensed Consolidated Income Statements. Penalties related to such taxes are recorded as General and Administrative Expenses in its Condensed Consolidated Income Statements. Interest expense and penalties related to income taxes are recorded as a component of Income Tax (Benefit) Expense in Sotheby’s Condensed Consolidated Income Statements.
18. Related Party Transactions
From time-to-time, in the ordinary course of business, related parties such as members of the Board of Directors and management transact with Sotheby's to buy and sell property at auction and through private sales. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, Sotheby’s recognized Agency Revenues of $1.3 million and $2 million, respectively, related to the sale and purchase of property by related parties. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, Sotheby’s recognized Agency Revenues of $2.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively, related to the sale and purchase of property by related parties. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, Accounts Receivable (net) included $0.3 million, $1.1 million, and $9.8 million, respectively, associated with auction or private sale purchases made by related parties.
19. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2014-09, which introduces a new five-step framework for revenue recognition. The core principal of the standard is that entities should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers. This standard can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. In July 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to January 1, 2018 with early adoption beginning January 1, 2017. Management is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting this new accounting standard on Sotheby’s financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02 which eliminates the deferral of the requirements of ASU 2009-17 for certain interests in investment funds and provides a scope exception from Accounting Standards Codification Topic 810 for certain investments in money market funds. ASU 2015-02 also makes several modifications to the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities ("VIEs") and general partners’ investments in limited partnerships, as well as modifications to the evaluation of whether limited partnerships are VIEs or voting interest entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting this new accounting standard on Sotheby’s financial statements.
27#
In March 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet. ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs to be included as a direct deduction from the related debt liability in the balance sheet. Under the current guidance, unamortized debt issuance costs are reported as assets in the balance sheet, but under the new standard, debt issuance costs will no longer be reported as assets. ASU 2015-03 will be effective for Sotheby’s beginning January 1, 2016 and must be applied retrospectively to each period presented. Management is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting this new accounting standard on Sotheby’s financial statements.
28#
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (or “MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with Note 4 (“Segment Reporting”) of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Sotheby's Business
Sotheby’s is a global art business whose operations are organized under two segments—Agency and Finance. The Agency segment earns commissions by matching buyers and sellers of authenticated fine art, decorative art, and jewelry (collectively, “art” or “works of art” or “artwork” or "property") through the auction or private sale process. To a much lesser extent, the Agency segment also earns revenues from the sale of artworks that have been purchased opportunistically by Sotheby’s. The Finance segment earns interest income through art-related financing activities by making loans that are secured by works of art. (See Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding a change in Sotheby's segment reporting that became effective in the second quarter of 2015.)
The global art market is influenced over time by the overall strength and stability of the global economy, the financial markets of various countries, geopolitical conditions, and world events, all of which may impact the willingness of potential buyers and sellers to purchase and sell art. In addition, the amount and quality of art consigned for sale is influenced by other factors not within Sotheby’s control, and many consignments often become available as a result of the death or financial or marital difficulties of the owner. These factors cause the supply and demand for works of art to be unpredictable and may lead to significant variability in Sotheby's revenues from period to period.
Competition in the international art market is intense. A fundamental challenge facing any auctioneer or art dealer is the sourcing of high quality and valuable property for sale either as agent or as principal. Sotheby's primary global competitor is Christie’s International, PLC, a privately held, French-owned, auction house. In response to the competitive environment, Sotheby’s may offer consignors a variety of financial inducements such as auction commission sharing arrangements and auction guarantees as a means to secure high-value consignments. Although these inducements may lead to a higher level of auction consignments, they put pressure on auction commission margins, and auction guarantees introduce the possibility of incurring a loss on the transaction and reduced liquidity if the underlying property fails to sell at the minimum guaranteed price. To mitigate the pressure on auction commission margins, from time-to-time, Sotheby’s adjusts its commission rate structures. In addition, Sotheby’s may reduce its financial exposure under auction guarantees through contractual risk and reward sharing arrangements such as irrevocable bids under which a counterparty commits to bid a predetermined price on the guaranteed property. However, Sotheby’s could be exposed to losses in the event any of its counterparties do not perform according to the terms of these contractual arrangements.
Sotheby's is a service business in which the ability of its employees to source high-value works of art and develop and maintain relationships with potential sellers and buyers of art is essential to its success. Sotheby's business is highly dependent upon attracting and retaining qualified personnel and employee compensation is its most substantial operating expense. Sotheby’s also incurs significant costs to promote and conduct its auctions, as well as general and administrative expenses to support its global operations. While a large portion of Sotheby’s expenses are fixed, certain categories of expense are variable. For example, sale marketing costs are dependent upon the volume of auction activity and certain elements of employee compensation are a function of Sotheby’s profitability.
Business and Industry Trends
In late-2009, the global art market began a period of expansion that has resulted in some of the most profitable years in Sotheby’s history, and the art market has remained strong to date. A significant driver of the expansion of the global art market and Sotheby’s profitability during this period has been the growth of the Contemporary and Asian art markets, as well as increased demand for art from clients in China and other emerging markets across several collecting categories.
As the global art market has grown, the value of the property sold by Sotheby's has increased and the competitive environment between Sotheby’s and Christie’s has intensified. These factors have resulted in a decline in auction commission margins over the past few years, with the competitive environment for high-value consignments causing an increase in the use of auction commission sharing arrangements and an increase in the use of auction guarantees, sometimes without the protection of irrevocable bids. To help mitigate the recent decline in auction commission margins, in March 2013 and again in February 2015, management enacted increases in Sotheby’s buyer’s premium rate structure. (See "Auction Commission Margin" within the discussion of Agency segment results below for additional commentary.)
29#
In recent years, there has also been an increase in the demand for art-related financing. In response, and in an effort to reduce the Finance segment's cost of capital and enhance returns, in January 2014, Sotheby's established a separate capital structure for the Finance segment through which client loans are predominantly funded with borrowings drawn from a dedicated revolving credit facility. The establishment of the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility has allowed management to debt fund 77% of the loan portfolio, and has contributed to a 63% increase in the client loan portfolio when compared to December 31, 2013 resulting in a 35% increase in Finance segment gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2015 when compared to the same period in the prior year.
Strategic Review
In the second quarter of 2015, Sotheby’s initiated a broad review of its business, with the objective of implementing a multi-faceted growth strategy for the Company. More details will be provided as management refines and implements these initiatives.
Seasonality
The worldwide art auction market has two principal selling seasons, which generally occur in the second and fourth quarters of the year. In the aggregate, second and fourth quarter Net Auction Sales represented 79% and 83% of total Net Auction Sales in 2014 and 2013, respectively, with auction commission revenues comprising approximately 81% of Sotheby's total revenues in those years. Accordingly, Sotheby's financial results are seasonal, with peak revenues and operating income generally occurring in the second and fourth quarters. Consequently, first and third quarter results have historically reflected lower revenues when compared to the second and fourth quarters and, typically, a net loss due to the fixed nature of many of Sotheby's operating expenses. Management believes that investors should focus on results for six and twelve month periods, which better reflect the business cycle of the art auction market.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015
Overview
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, Sotheby's reported operating income of $116.5 million and $134.9 million, respectively, as compared to $130.4 million and $134.5 million, respectively, for the same periods in the prior year. Excluding CEO and other leadership transition costs in the current year, and special charges associated with shareholder activism in the prior year, Adjusted Operating Income* for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was $125.5 million and $147.7 million, respectively, representing decreases of $23.5 million (16%) and $11.1 million (7%), respectively, versus the prior year.
The lower level of Adjusted Operating Income* in the current periods is largely due to a change in the timing of Sotheby's evening sale of Contemporary Art in London, which was held in the third quarter in 2015 after being held in the second quarter in 2014, as well as a loss incurred on a painting acquired by Sotheby’s earlier in the year and sold at auction in the second quarter. This painting was acquired along with another painting that was sold at auction for an offsetting profit which will be recognized later in the year when payment is received and title passes to the buyer. Also unfavorably influencing the comparison to the prior periods is the impact of provisions recorded in the second quarter of 2015 as a result of recent developments, including a cancelled sale provision due to a buyer default and the cost associated with a client authenticity claim, both related to property sold through Sotheby's in prior years. The comparison of Adjusted Operating Income* between the periods is favorably impacted by the increase in Sotheby's buyer's premium rate structure that was enacted in February 2015 and a higher level of private sale commissions, as well as continued growth in the profitability of Sotheby's Finance segment.
___________________
* See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for a description of this non-GAAP financial measure.
30#
Outlook
The third quarter at Sotheby’s is a seasonally slow period, with only a few important sales - Contemporary Art and Old Masters in London, in July, and Asia Week in New York, upcoming in September - along with only a few sales across other collecting categories. Based on the results of the July sales in London, management projects that Adjusted Operating Income* for the third quarter of 2015 will be similar to the third quarter a year ago. Although the results for the third quarter of 2015 will include the typically low margin Contemporary Art evening sale in London, which was held in the second quarter in 2014, management has seen weaker sales results in the quarter in other collecting categories that typically have higher margins, including Old Masters. Final results for the third quarter of 2015 will depend on the remaining sales in the period, including the New York Asia Week sales in September. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
On August 6, 2015, Sotheby’s Board of Directors approved an increase of $125 million to Sotheby's remaining share repurchase authorization of $125 million, resulting in a total share repurchase authorization of $250 million. The Board of Directors has concluded that this share repurchase program, which is expected to be funded from existing cash balances, provides a balance between preserving capital for growth, downside risk protection, and returning available capital to shareholders. Sotheby’s intends to repurchase $125 million of its Common Stock from shareholders in the near term via an Accelerated Share Repurchase (“ASR”) Program. Management expects that the balance of the share repurchase program will be executed in the next 12 to 18 months, via open market transactions and/or additional ASR Programs. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
___________________
* See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for a description of this non-GAAP financial measure.
31#
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
The table below presents a summary of Sotheby’s consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars, except per share data):
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Agency commissions and fees | $ | 310,377 | $ | 316,187 | $ | (5,810 | ) | (2 | %) | ||||||
Inventory sales | 7,005 | 8,733 | (1,728 | ) | (20 | %) | |||||||||
Finance | 11,970 | 8,140 | 3,830 | 47 | % | ||||||||||
License fees | 2,468 | 2,462 | 6 | — | % | ||||||||||
Other | 186 | 295 | (109 | ) | (37 | %) | |||||||||
Total revenues | 332,006 | 335,817 | (3,811 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Agency direct costs | 32,730 | 31,617 | (1,113 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Cost of inventory sales | 16,989 | 7,518 | (9,471 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Cost of Finance revenues | 3,874 | 2,024 | (1,850 | ) | (91 | %) | |||||||||
Marketing | 4,748 | 4,564 | (184 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Salaries and related | 108,182 | 97,833 | (10,349 | ) | (11 | %) | |||||||||
General and administrative | 44,731 | 38,210 | (6,521 | ) | (17 | %) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,781 | 5,066 | 285 | 6 | % | ||||||||||
CEO separation and transition costs (a) | 43 | — | (43 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Restructuring charges, net (b) | (530 | ) | — | 530 | N/A | ||||||||||
Special charges (c) | — | 18,554 | 18,554 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
Total expenses | 215,548 | 205,386 | (10,162 | ) | (5 | %) | |||||||||
Operating income | 116,458 | 130,431 | (13,973 | ) | (11 | %) | |||||||||
Net interest expense (d) | (8,444 | ) | (8,366 | ) | (78 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||
Other income | 245 | 694 | (449 | ) | (65 | %) | |||||||||
Income before taxes | 108,259 | 122,759 | (14,500 | ) | (12 | %) | |||||||||
Equity in earnings of investees | 1,982 | 230 | 1,752 | * | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 42,789 | 45,344 | 2,555 | 6 | % | ||||||||||
Net income | 67,452 | 77,645 | (10,193 | ) | (13 | %) | |||||||||
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest | (120 | ) | 13 | (133 | ) | N/A | |||||||||
Net income attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 67,572 | $ | 77,632 | $ | (10,060 | ) | (13 | %) | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share - Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 0.96 | $ | 1.11 | $ | (0.15 | ) | (14 | %) | ||||||
Statistical Metrics: | |||||||||||||||
Aggregate Auction Sales (e) | $ | 2,201,464 | $ | 2,323,976 | $ | (122,512 | ) | (5 | %) | ||||||
Net Auction Sales (f) | $ | 1,856,643 | $ | 1,971,338 | $ | (114,695 | ) | (6 | %) | ||||||
Private Sales (g) | $ | 232,702 | $ | 146,681 | $ | 86,021 | 59 | % | |||||||
Consolidated Sales (h) | $ | 2,439,086 | $ | 2,477,390 | $ | (38,304 | ) | (2 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted Expenses (i) | $ | 185,671 | $ | 177,290 | $ | (8,381 | ) | (5 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted Operating Income (i) | $ | 125,472 | $ | 148,985 | $ | (23,513 | ) | (16 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted Net Income (i) | $ | 73,061 | $ | 87,836 | $ | (14,775 | ) | (17 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share (i) | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.26 | $ | (0.22 | ) | (17 | %) | ||||||
EBITDA (i) | $ | 127,460 | $ | 138,620 | $ | (11,160 | ) | (8 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (i) | $ | 136,474 | $ | 157,174 | $ | (20,700 | ) | (13 | %) | ||||||
EBITDA Margin (i) | 38.4 | % | 41.3 | % | (2.9 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (i) | 41.1 | % | 46.8 | % | (5.7 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
Effective income tax rate | 39.5 | % | 36.9 | % | (2.6 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
32#
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Agency commissions and fees | $ | 438,259 | $ | 439,315 | $ | (1,056 | ) | — | % | ||||||
Inventory sales | 19,988 | 34,734 | (14,746 | ) | (42 | %) | |||||||||
Finance | 24,657 | 13,822 | 10,835 | 78 | % | ||||||||||
License fees | 4,442 | 4,159 | 283 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
Other | 335 | 598 | (263 | ) | (44 | %) | |||||||||
Total revenues | 487,681 | 492,628 | (4,947 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Agency direct costs | 44,569 | 42,054 | (2,515 | ) | (6 | %) | |||||||||
Cost of inventory sales | 28,702 | 32,020 | 3,318 | 10 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of Finance revenues | 7,262 | 2,734 | (4,528 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Marketing | 8,808 | 7,697 | (1,111 | ) | (14 | %) | |||||||||
Salaries and related | 171,112 | 163,589 | (7,523 | ) | (5 | %) | |||||||||
General and administrative | 79,460 | 75,542 | (3,918 | ) | (5 | %) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 9,563 | 10,213 | 650 | 6 | % | ||||||||||
CEO separation and transition costs (a) | 4,232 | — | (4,232 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Restructuring charges, net (b) | (889 | ) | — | 889 | N/A | ||||||||||
Special charges (c) | — | 24,257 | 24,257 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
Total expenses | 352,819 | 358,106 | 5,287 | 1 | % | ||||||||||
Operating income | 134,862 | 134,522 | 340 | — | % | ||||||||||
Net interest expense (d) | (16,976 | ) | (16,733 | ) | (243 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||
Other expense | (1,714 | ) | (748 | ) | (966 | ) | * | ||||||||
Income before taxes | 116,172 | 117,041 | (869 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||
Equity in earnings of investees | 3,126 | 384 | 2,742 | * | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 46,713 | 45,675 | (1,038 | ) | (2 | %) | |||||||||
Net income | 72,585 | 71,750 | 835 | 1 | % | ||||||||||
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest | (189 | ) | 232 | (421 | ) | N/A | |||||||||
Net income attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 72,774 | $ | 71,518 | $ | 1,256 | 2 | % | |||||||
Diluted earnings per share - Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.01 | $ | 0.03 | 3 | % | |||||||
Statistical Metrics: | |||||||||||||||
Aggregate Auction Sales (e) | $ | 3,096,907 | $ | 3,191,657 | $ | (94,750 | ) | (3 | %) | ||||||
Net Auction Sales (f) | $ | 2,612,460 | $ | 2,705,708 | $ | (93,248 | ) | (3 | %) | ||||||
Private Sales (g) | $ | 370,193 | $ | 294,031 | $ | 76,162 | 26 | % | |||||||
Consolidated Sales (h) | $ | 3,476,624 | $ | 3,497,281 | $ | (20,657 | ) | (1 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted Expenses (i) | $ | 304,011 | $ | 299,095 | $ | (4,916 | ) | (2 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted Operating Income (i) | $ | 147,706 | $ | 158,779 | $ | (11,073 | ) | (7 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted Net Income (i) | $ | 80,484 | $ | 84,859 | $ | (4,375 | ) | (5 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share (i) | $ | 1.15 | $ | 1.20 | $ | (0.05 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||
EBITDA (i) | $ | 153,288 | $ | 147,187 | $ | 6,101 | 4 | % | |||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (i) | $ | 166,132 | $ | 171,444 | $ | (5,312 | ) | (3 | %) | ||||||
EBITDA Margin (i) | 31.4 | % | 29.9 | % | 1.5 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (i) | 34.1 | % | 34.8 | % | (0.7 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
Effective income tax rate | 40.2 | % | 39.0 | % | (1.2 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
33#
Legend: | |
* | Represents a change in excess of 100%. |
(a) | Includes compensation-related costs and professional fees associated with the hiring of Thomas S. Smith, Jr. as Sotheby's President and Chief Executive Officer. |
(b) | Relates to adjustments made to the accrual for employee termination benefits associated with the 2014 Restructuring Plan. |
(c) | Consists of expenses directly associated with issues related to shareholder activism and the resulting proxy contest with Third Point LLC ("Third Point"). |
(d) | Represents interest expense less interest income. |
(e) | Represents the total hammer price of property sold at auction plus buyer’s premium. |
(f) | Represents the total hammer price of property sold at auction. |
(g) | Represents the total purchase price of property sold in private sales brokered by Sotheby’s, including its commissions. |
(h) | Represents the sum of Aggregate Auction Sales, Private Sales, and Inventory sales. For the purposes of this calculation, the aggregate sale price associated with Sotheby's inventory sold at auction during the period is eliminated. For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, such sales totaled $2.1 million and $2 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, such sales totaled $10.5 million and $23.1 million, respectively. |
(i) | See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for a description of this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure. |
34#
Agency Segment
The Agency segment earns commissions by matching buyers and sellers (also known as consignors) of authenticated fine art, decorative art, and jewelry through the auction or private sale process. To a much lesser extent, the Agency segment also earns revenues from the sale of artworks that have been purchased opportunistically by Sotheby's. (See Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding a change in Sotheby's segment reporting that became effective in the second quarter of 2015.)
The table below presents a summary of Agency segment gross profit and related statistical metrics for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Agency commissions and fees: | |||||||||||||||
Auction commissions | $ | 287,487 | $ | 299,167 | $ | (11,680 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||
Private sale commissions | 22,292 | 16,876 | 5,416 | 32 | % | ||||||||||
Auction guarantees, net | (7,508 | ) | (6,215 | ) | (1,293 | ) | (21 | %) | |||||||
Other | 8,106 | 6,359 | 1,747 | 27 | % | ||||||||||
Total Agency commissions and fees | 310,377 | 316,187 | (5,810 | ) | (2 | %) | |||||||||
Inventory sales | 4,026 | 6,686 | (2,660 | ) | (40 | %) | |||||||||
Total Agency segment revenues | 314,403 | 322,873 | (8,470 | ) | (3 | %) | |||||||||
Agency direct costs: | |||||||||||||||
Auction direct costs | 31,386 | 30,100 | (1,286 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Private sale expenses | 1,344 | 1,517 | 173 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Total Agency direct costs | 32,730 | 31,617 | (1,113 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Cost of inventory sales | 15,017 | 5,184 | (9,833 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Total Agency direct costs and cost of inventory sales | 47,747 | 36,801 | (10,946 | ) | (30 | %) | |||||||||
Intersegment costs: | |||||||||||||||
Interest (a) | 1,557 | 1,510 | (47 | ) | (3 | %) | |||||||||
Facility fees (b) | 494 | 536 | 42 | 8 | % | ||||||||||
Consignment fees (c) | 2,318 | 2,158 | (160 | ) | (7 | %) | |||||||||
Total intersegment costs | 4,369 | 4,204 | (165 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Agency segment gross profit (d) | $ | 262,287 | $ | 281,868 | $ | (19,581 | ) | (7 | %) | ||||||
Statistical Metrics: | |||||||||||||||
Aggregate Auction Sales (e) | $ | 2,201,464 | $ | 2,323,976 | $ | (122,512 | ) | (5 | %) | ||||||
Net Auction Sales (f) | $ | 1,856,643 | $ | 1,971,338 | $ | (114,695 | ) | (6 | %) | ||||||
Items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $1 million | 261 | 305 | (44 | ) | (14 | %) | |||||||||
Total hammer price of items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $1 million | $ | 1,280,536 | $ | 1,292,115 | $ | (11,579 | ) | (1 | %) | ||||||
Items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $2 million | 148 | 179 | (31 | ) | (17 | %) | |||||||||
Total hammer price of items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $2 million | $ | 1,139,803 | $ | 1,116,567 | $ | 23,236 | 2 | % | |||||||
Items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $3 million | 97 | 125 | (28 | ) | (22 | %) | |||||||||
Total hammer price of items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $3 million | $ | 1,014,503 | $ | 987,908 | $ | 26,595 | 3 | % | |||||||
Auction commission margin (g) | 15.5 | % | 15.2 | % | 0.3 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Auction direct costs as a percentage of Net Auction Sales | 1.69 | % | 1.53 | % | (0.16 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
Private Sales (h) | $ | 232,702 | $ | 146,681 | $ | 86,021 | 59 | % | |||||||
35#
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Agency commissions and fees: | |||||||||||||||
Auction commissions | $ | 400,502 | $ | 403,840 | $ | (3,338 | ) | (1 | %) | ||||||
Private sale commissions | 33,750 | 29,931 | 3,819 | 13 | % | ||||||||||
Auction guarantees, net | (8,259 | ) | (5,545 | ) | (2,714 | ) | (49 | %) | |||||||
Other | 12,266 | 11,089 | 1,177 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Total agency commissions and fees | 438,259 | 439,315 | (1,056 | ) | — | % | |||||||||
Inventory sales | 15,833 | 31,496 | (15,663 | ) | (50 | %) | |||||||||
Total Agency segment revenues | 454,092 | 470,811 | (16,719 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Agency direct costs: | |||||||||||||||
Auction direct costs | 41,468 | 38,978 | (2,490 | ) | (6 | %) | |||||||||
Private sale expenses | 3,101 | 3,076 | (25 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||
Total Agency direct costs | 44,569 | 42,054 | (2,515 | ) | (6 | %) | |||||||||
Cost of inventory sales | 25,911 | 28,837 | 2,926 | 10 | % | ||||||||||
Total Agency direct costs and cost of inventory sales | 70,480 | 70,891 | 411 | 1 | % | ||||||||||
Intersegment costs: | |||||||||||||||
Interest (a) | 2,458 | 3,545 | 1,087 | 31 | % | ||||||||||
Facility fees (b) | 918 | 1,034 | 116 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Consignment fees (c) | 4,263 | 2,890 | (1,373 | ) | (48 | %) | |||||||||
Total intersegment costs | 7,639 | 7,469 | (170 | ) | (2 | %) | |||||||||
Agency segment gross profit (d) | $ | 375,973 | $ | 392,451 | $ | (16,478 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||
Statistical Metrics: | |||||||||||||||
Aggregate Auction Sales (e) | $ | 3,096,907 | $ | 3,191,657 | $ | (94,750 | ) | (3 | %) | ||||||
Net Auction Sales (f) | $ | 2,612,460 | $ | 2,705,708 | $ | (93,248 | ) | (3 | %) | ||||||
Items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $1 million | 373 | 412 | (39 | ) | (9 | %) | |||||||||
Total hammer price of items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $1 million | $ | 1,757,419 | $ | 1,709,608 | $ | 47,811 | 3 | % | |||||||
Items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $2 million | 212 | 240 | (28 | ) | (12 | %) | |||||||||
Total hammer price of items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $2 million | $ | 1,550,833 | $ | 1,466,242 | $ | 84,591 | 6 | % | |||||||
Items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $3 million | 136 | 160 | (24 | ) | (15 | %) | |||||||||
Total hammer price of items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $3 million | $ | 1,363,003 | $ | 1,273,608 | $ | 89,395 | 7 | % | |||||||
Auction commission margin (g) | 15.3 | % | 14.9 | % | 0.4 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Auction direct costs as a percentage of Net Auction Sales | 1.59 | % | 1.44 | % | (0.15 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
Private Sales (h) | $ | 370,193 | $ | 294,031 | $ | 76,162 | 26 | % | |||||||
36#
Legend: | |||||||
* | Represents a change in excess of 100%. | ||||||
(a) | Represents interest charged by the Finance segment for secured loans issued with an interest rate below the Finance segment's target rate. Such loans are sometimes issued by the Finance segment as an accommodation to the Agency segment in order to obtain consigned property or enhance a client relationship. | ||||||
(b) | Represents facility fees charged by the Finance segment for secured loans where a reduced or no facility fee is collected from the borrower. Such fees are sometimes reduced or waived by the Finance segment as an accommodation to the Agency segment in order to secure consignments or enhance a client relationship. | ||||||
(c) | Represents fees charged by the Finance segment for term loan collateral consigned to and sold at auction or privately during the period. The Finance segment began charging this fee effective January 1, 2015. Prior period segment results are presented on a comparable basis. | ||||||
(d) | The calculation of Agency segment gross profit does not include the impact of salaries and related costs, general and administrative expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense. However, these items are deducted in the determination of segment income before taxes as reported in Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||||||
(e) | Represents the total hammer price of property sold at auction plus buyer's premium. | ||||||
(f) | Represents the total hammer price of property sold at auction. | ||||||
(g) | Represents total auction commission revenues as a percentage of Net Auction Sales. | ||||||
(h) | Represents the total purchase price of property sold in private sales brokered by Sotheby's, including its commissions. | ||||||
Overview—For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, Agency segment gross profit decreased $19.6 million (7%) and $16.5 million (4%), respectively, due in large part to a change in the timing of the evening sale of Contemporary Art in London, which was held in the third quarter in 2015 after being held in the second quarter in 2014. This shift in timing contributed to the lower level of auction commission revenues during the current three and six month periods, which saw decreases of 4% and 1%, respectively, when compared to the prior year. Also significantly contributing to the decline in Agency segment gross profit for the current periods are unfavorable movements in foreign currency exchange rates, as well as higher auction direct costs and a loss incurred on a painting acquired by Sotheby’s earlier in the year and sold at auction in the second quarter. This painting was acquired along with another painting that was sold at auction for an offsetting profit which will be recognized later in the year when payment is received and title passes to the buyer. Partially offsetting these factors is the increase in Sotheby's buyer's premium rate structure that was enacted in February 2015, as well as increases of $5.4 million (32%) and $3.8 million (13%), respectively, in private sale commissions.
Auction Commission Revenues—In its role as auctioneer, Sotheby’s accepts property on consignment and matches sellers to buyers through the auction process. Sotheby’s invoices the buyer for the purchase price of the property (including the commission owed by the buyer), collects payment from the buyer, and remits to the seller the net sale proceeds after deducting its commissions, expenses and applicable taxes and royalties. Sotheby’s auction commissions include those paid by the buyer (“buyer’s premium”) and those paid by the seller (“seller’s commission”) (collectively, “auction commission revenue”), both of which are calculated as a percentage of Net Auction Sales.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, auction commission revenues decreased by $11.7 million (4%) and $3.3 million (1%), respectively, and were significantly impacted by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate changes which contributed $11.3 million and $18.2 million, respectively, to the overall decreases. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, and despite the change in the timing of the evening sale of Contemporary Art in London discussed above, auction commission revenues remained relatively constant in relation to the second quarter of 2014 and increased by $14.8 million (4%) when compared to the prior year-to-date period principally due to an improvement in Auction Commission Margin. See "Net Auction Sales" and "Auction Commission Margin" below for a more detailed discussion of these statistical metrics.
Net Auction Sales—For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, Net Auction Sales decreased by $114.7 million (6%) and $93.2 million (3%), respectively, and were significantly influenced by the timing of the evening sale of Contemporary Art in London which, in 2014, was held in the second quarter and totaled $137.4 million in Net Auction Sales. In 2015, the comparable sale was held in the third quarter and totaled approximately $177.3 million in Net Auction Sales. The comparisons to prior year periods were also significantly impacted by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate changes which contributed $61.7 million and $111.8 million, respectively, to the overall decreases. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, Net Auction Sales decreased $53 million (3%) in relation to the second quarter of 2014 and increased $18.6 million (1%) when compared to the prior year-to-date period. The comparisons versus the prior year periods are also influenced by the strong performance of Sotheby's Impressionist and Modern Art sales during the periods, with second quarter results improving $174.6 million (36%) and year-to-date results improving $196.6 million (25%), partially offset by lower sales of other fine art, decorative art, and collectibles, due in part to a lower level of single-owner sales in those categories.
37#
The tables below summarize Sotheby's Net Auction Sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in millions of dollars):
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Impressionist and Modern Art | $ | 661.3 | $ | 486.7 | $ | 174.6 | 36 | % | |||||||
Contemporary Art | 429.9 | 589.4 | (159.5 | ) | (27 | %) | |||||||||
Asian Art | 267.6 | 294.7 | (27.1 | ) | (9 | %) | |||||||||
Jewelry | 244.4 | 240.2 | 4.2 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
Old Master and British Paintings and Drawings | 29.0 | 25.6 | 3.4 | 13 | % | ||||||||||
Other fine art, decorative art and collectibles | 286.1 | 334.7 | (48.6 | ) | (15 | %) | |||||||||
Sub-total | 1,918.3 | 1,971.3 | (53.0 | ) | (3 | %) | |||||||||
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes | (61.7 | ) | N/A | (61.7 | ) | N/A | |||||||||
Total | $ | 1,856.6 | $ | 1,971.3 | $ | (114.7 | ) | (6 | %) | ||||||
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Impressionist and Modern Art | $ | 975.2 | $ | 778.6 | $ | 196.6 | 25 | % | |||||||
Contemporary Art | 701.3 | 764.7 | (63.4 | ) | (8 | %) | |||||||||
Asian Art | 331.5 | 346.6 | (15.1 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Jewelry | 256.6 | 252.8 | 3.8 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
Old Master and British Paintings and Drawings | 98.1 | 92.6 | 5.5 | 6 | % | ||||||||||
Other fine art, decorative art and collectibles | 361.6 | 470.4 | (108.8 | ) | (23 | %) | |||||||||
Sub-total | 2,724.3 | 2,705.7 | 18.6 | 1 | % | ||||||||||
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes | (111.8 | ) | N/A | (111.8 | ) | N/A | |||||||||
Total | $ | 2,612.5 | $ | 2,705.7 | $ | (93.2 | ) | (3 | %) | ||||||
Auction Commission Margin—Auction Commission Margin represents total auction commission revenues as a percentage of Net Auction Sales. Typically, Auction Commission Margin is higher for lower value works of art or collections, while higher valued property earns a lower Auction Commission Margin. Accordingly, Auction Commission Margin may be adversely impacted by the mix of property sold in a period. Auction Commission Margin may also be adversely impacted by arrangements whereby Sotheby's shares its buyer's premium with a consignor in order to secure a high-value consignment, as well as by Sotheby's use of auction guarantees. For example, when issuing an auction guarantee, Sotheby's may enter into a risk and reward sharing arrangement with a counterparty whereby Sotheby's financial exposure under the auction guarantee is reduced in exchange for sharing its buyer's premium. Also, in situations when guaranteed property sells for less than the guaranteed price, Sotheby's buyer's premium from that sale is used to reduce the loss on the transaction. (See Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to Sotheby's use of auction guarantees.)
In order to enhance revenue and strengthen auction commission margins, on February 1, 2015, Sotheby’s enacted a new buyer's premium rate structure that is generally 25% on the first $200,000 of hammer (sale) price; 20% on the portion of hammer (sale) price above $200,000 up to and including $3 million; and 12% on any remaining amount above $3 million. The hammer (sale) price thresholds in other currencies have been adjusted in a commensurate manner. The previous buyer’s premium rate structure, which was in effect since March 15, 2013, was 25% on the first $100,000 of hammer (sale) price; 20% on the portion of hammer (sale) price above $100,000 up to and including $2 million; and 12% on any remaining amount above $2 million.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, Auction Commission Margin increased 0.3% (from 15.2% to 15.5%) and 0.4% (from 14.9% to 15.3%), respectively, primarily due to the change in the buyer's premium rate structure enacted on February 1, 2015, which added $25 million and $31 million in incremental buyer's premium revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, partially offset by a higher level of shared auction commissions. Auction Commission Margin was also unfavorably impacted by a change in sales mix, as a higher value of property was sold in the upper price bands of Sotheby's buyer's premium rate structure in the current periods.
38#
Private Sale Commission Revenues—Private sale commission revenues are earned through the direct brokering of purchases and sales of art. Private sales are initiated either by a client wishing to sell property with Sotheby's acting as its exclusive agent in the transaction, or by a prospective buyer who is interested in purchasing a certain work of art privately. Because private sales are individually negotiated non-recurring transactions, the volume and value of transactions completed can vary from period to period, with associated variability in revenues. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, private sale commissions increased $5.4 million (32%) and $3.8 million (13%) due to an increase in the volume of high-value transactions completed during the periods.
Other Agency Revenues—Other Agency revenues principally includes commissions and other fees earned by Sotheby's on sales brokered by third parties, fees charged to consignors for property withdrawn prior to auction and for catalogue production and insurance, and catalogue subscription and advertising revenues. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, other Agency revenues increased $1.7 million (27%) and $1.2 million (11%), respectively, primarily due to an increase in property withdrawal fees.
Agency Direct Costs—The table below presents a summary of Agency direct costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, as well as a comparison between the current and prior year periods (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable / (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Auction direct costs: | |||||||||||||||
Sale marketing | $ | 13,795 | $ | 12,920 | $ | (875 | ) | (7 | %) | ||||||
Shipping | 5,035 | 4,397 | (638 | ) | (15 | %) | |||||||||
Sale venue | 6,581 | 6,201 | (380 | ) | (6 | %) | |||||||||
Other | 5,975 | 6,582 | 607 | 9 | % | ||||||||||
Total auction direct costs | 31,386 | 30,100 | (1,286 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Private sale expenses | 1,344 | 1,517 | 173 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Total Agency direct costs | $ | 32,730 | $ | 31,617 | $ | (1,113 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||
Statistical Metric: | |||||||||||||||
Auction direct costs as a % of Net Auction Sales | 1.69 | % | 1.53 | % | (0.16 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
Favorable / (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Auction direct costs: | |||||||||||||||
Sale marketing | $ | 18,534 | $ | 16,806 | $ | (1,728 | ) | (10 | %) | ||||||
Shipping | 7,837 | 6,472 | (1,365 | ) | (21 | %) | |||||||||
Sale venue | 7,807 | 7,327 | (480 | ) | (7 | %) | |||||||||
Other | 7,290 | 8,373 | 1,083 | 13 | % | ||||||||||
Total auction direct costs | 41,468 | 38,978 | (2,490 | ) | (6 | %) | |||||||||
Private sale expenses | 3,101 | 3,076 | (25 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||
Total Agency direct costs | $ | 44,569 | $ | 42,054 | $ | (2,515 | ) | (6 | %) | ||||||
Statistical Metric: | |||||||||||||||
Auction direct costs as a % of Net Auction Sales | 1.59 | % | 1.44 | % | (0.15 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
Auction Direct Costs—A large portion of auction direct costs relate to sale marketing expenses such as catalogue production and distribution, advertising and promotion costs, and traveling exhibition costs. Auction direct costs also include the cost of shipping property, sale venue costs, and other direct costs such as debit and credit card processing fees. The level of auction direct costs incurred in a period is generally dependent upon the volume and composition of Sotheby's auction sale offerings. For example, direct costs attributable to auctions of single-owner or other high-value collections are typically higher than those associated with standard various-owner auctions, mainly due to higher promotional costs for catalogues, special events, and traveling exhibitions, as well as higher shipping expenses.
39#
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, changes in foreign currency exchange rates reduced Agency direct costs by $0.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Excluding the the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, auction direct costs increased $2 million (6%) and $4.2 million (10%), respectively, primarily due to higher costs incurred to promote and conduct Sotheby's Impressionist and Contemporary Art sales in New York and London and costs associated with Sotheby's Contemporary Art auction held in Doha. Sotheby's did not conduct auction sales in Doha in the first half of 2014.
Inventory Sales and Cost of Inventory Sales—The tables below summarize the results of Sotheby's inventory activities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Inventory sales | $ | 4,026 | $ | 6,686 | $ | (2,660 | ) | (40 | %) | ||||||
Cost of inventory sales | 15,017 | 5,184 | (9,833 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Gross (loss) profit | $ | (10,991 | ) | $ | 1,502 | $ | (12,493 | ) | N/A | ||||||
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Inventory sales | $ | 15,833 | $ | 31,496 | $ | (15,663 | ) | (50 | %) | ||||||
Cost of inventory sales | 25,911 | 28,837 | 2,926 | 10 | % | ||||||||||
Gross (loss) profit | $ | (10,078 | ) | $ | 2,659 | $ | (12,737 | ) | N/A | ||||||
Legend: | |||||||||||||||
* Represents a change in excess of 100%. | |||||||||||||||
The unfavorable comparison of Sotheby's inventory activities to the prior periods is significantly impacted by a loss incurred on a painting acquired by Sotheby’s earlier in the year and sold at auction in the second quarter. This painting was acquired along with another painting that was sold at auction for an offsetting profit which will be recognized later in the year when payment is received and title passes to the buyer. Also impacting the unfavorable comparison to the prior periods is a series of profitable sales in the first and second quarter of 2014 of items acquired for investment purposes.
Finance Segment
The Finance segment provides certain collectors and art dealers with financing secured by works of art that Sotheby's either has in its possession or permits borrowers to possess. The Finance segment generally makes two types of secured loans: (1) advances secured by consigned property where the borrowers are contractually committed, in the near term, to sell the property through Sotheby's Agency segment (a “consignor advance”); and (2) general purpose term loans secured by property not presently intended for sale (a “term loan”).
Prior to 2014, the lending activities of the Finance segment were funded primarily by the operating cash flows of the Agency segment, with the ability to supplement those cash flows with revolving credit facility borrowings. In January 2014, in order to reduce the Finance segment's cost of capital and enhance returns, Sotheby's established a separate capital structure for the Finance segment through which client loans are predominantly funded with borrowings drawn from a dedicated revolving credit facility. The establishment of the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility in February 2014 allowed management to debt fund a substantial portion of pre-existing loans and fund further growth of the loan portfolio. Cash balances are also used to fund a portion of the Finance segment loan portfolio, as appropriate.
On June 15, 2015, Sotheby's credit agreement was amended to increase the borrowing capacity of the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility by $485 million to $1.035 billion in order to support the continued growth of the Finance segment's loan portfolio.
40#
The table below presents a summary of Finance segment gross profit and related statistical metrics as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, as well as a comparison between the current and prior year periods (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable/(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Finance revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Client paid revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 10,528 | $ | 7,157 | $ | 3,371 | 47 | % | |||||||
Fees | 1,442 | 983 | 459 | 47 | % | ||||||||||
Total client paid revenues | 11,970 | 8,140 | 3,830 | 47 | % | ||||||||||
Intersegment revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Interest (a) | 1,557 | 1,510 | 47 | 3 | % | ||||||||||
Facility fees (b) | 494 | 536 | (42 | ) | (8 | %) | |||||||||
Consignment fees (c) | 2,318 | 2,158 | 160 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
Total intersegment revenues | 4,369 | 4,204 | 165 | 4 | % | ||||||||||
Total Finance revenues | 16,339 | 12,344 | 3,995 | 32 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of Finance revenues (d) | 3,874 | 2,024 | (1,850 | ) | (91 | %) | |||||||||
Finance segment gross profit (e) | $ | 12,465 | $ | 10,320 | $ | 2,145 | 21 | % | |||||||
Loan Portfolio Metrics: | |||||||||||||||
Loan Portfolio Balance (f) | $ | 774,040 | $ | 594,370 | $ | 179,670 | 30 | % | |||||||
Average Loan Portfolio (g) | $ | 752,874 | $ | 561,730 | $ | 191,144 | 34 | % | |||||||
Credit Facility Borrowings Outstanding (h) | $ | 593,000 | $ | 345,000 | $ | 248,000 | 72 | % | |||||||
Average Credit Facility Borrowings (i) | $ | 538,868 | $ | 284,176 | $ | 254,692 | 90 | % | |||||||
Average Equity in Loan Portfolio (j) | $ | 214,006 | $ | 277,554 | $ | 63,548 | 23 | % | |||||||
Finance Revenue Margin (k) | 8.7 | % | 8.8 | % | (0.1%) | N/A | |||||||||
Finance Segment Leverage Ratio (l) | 76.6 | % | 58.0 | % | 18.6 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Finance Segment LTM Return on Equity (m) | 12.3 | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
41#
Favorable/(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Finance revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Client paid revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 20,244 | $ | 12,318 | $ | 7,926 | 64 | % | |||||||
Fees | 4,413 | 1,504 | 2,909 | * | |||||||||||
Total client paid revenues | 24,657 | 13,822 | 10,835 | 78 | % | ||||||||||
Intersegment revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Interest (a) | 2,458 | 3,545 | (1,087 | ) | (31 | %) | |||||||||
Facility fees (b) | 918 | 1,034 | (116 | ) | (11 | %) | |||||||||
Consignment fees (c) | 4,263 | 2,890 | 1,373 | 48 | % | ||||||||||
Total intersegment revenues | 7,639 | 7,469 | 170 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
Total Finance revenues | 32,296 | 21,291 | 11,005 | 52 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of Finance revenues (d) | 7,262 | 2,734 | (4,528 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Finance segment gross profit (e) | $ | 25,034 | $ | 18,557 | $ | 6,477 | 35 | % | |||||||
Loan Portfolio Metrics: | |||||||||||||||
Loan Portfolio Balance (f) | $ | 774,040 | $ | 594,370 | $ | 179,670 | 30 | % | |||||||
Average Loan Portfolio (g) | $ | 715,464 | $ | 521,463 | $ | 194,001 | 37 | % | |||||||
Credit Facility Borrowings Outstanding (h) | $ | 593,000 | $ | 345,000 | $ | 248,000 | 72 | % | |||||||
Average Credit Facility Borrowings (i) | $ | 506,052 | $ | 188,591 | $ | 317,461 | * | ||||||||
Average Equity in Loan Portfolio (j) | $ | 209,412 | $ | 332,872 | $ | 123,460 | 37 | % | |||||||
Finance Revenue Margin (k) | 9.0 | % | 8.2 | % | 0.8 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Finance Segment Leverage Ratio (l) | 76.6 | % | 58.0 | % | 18.6 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Finance Segment LTM Return on Equity (m) | 12.3 | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
42#
Legend: | ||||
* | Represents a change in excess of 100%. | |||
(a) | Represents interest earned from the Agency segment for secured loans issued with an interest rate below the Finance segment's target rate. Such loans are sometimes issued by the Finance segment as an accommodation to the Agency segment in order to secure consignments or enhance a client relationship. | |||
(b) | Represents facility fees earned from the Agency segment for secured loans where a reduced or no facility fee is collected from the borrower. Such fees are sometimes reduced or waived by the Finance segment as an accommodation to the Agency segment in order to obtain consigned property or enhance a client relationship. | |||
(c) | Represents fees earned from the Agency segment for Finance segment term loan collateral sold at auction or privately during the period. The Finance segment began charging this fee effective January 1, 2015. Prior period segment results are presented on a comparable basis. | |||
(d) | The cost of Finance revenues includes borrowing costs related to the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility, including interest expense, commitment fees, and the amortization of amendment and arrangement fees. | |||
(e) | The calculation of Finance segment gross profit does not include the impact of salaries and related costs, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization expense, and intercompany charges from Sotheby's global treasury function. However, these items are deducted in the determination of segment income before taxes as reported in Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. | |||
(f) | Represents the period ending net loan portfolio balance for the Finance segment. | |||
(g) | Represents the average loan portfolio outstanding during the period. | |||
(h) | Represents the period ending balance of borrowings outstanding under the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility. | |||
(i) | Represents average borrowings outstanding during the period under the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility. | |||
(j) | Represents the average loan portfolio balance outstanding during the period less the average borrowings outstanding during the period under the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility. | |||
(k) | Represents the annualized margin of total client paid and intersegment Finance revenues in relation to the Average Loan Portfolio. | |||
(l) | Calculated as Credit Facility Borrowings Outstanding divided by the Loan Portfolio Balance. | |||
(m) | Represents the return of Finance segment net income, excluding allocated corporate overhead costs, over the last twelve months ("LTM") in relation to the Average Equity in Loan Portfolio during that period. For the purposes of this calculation, income taxes are provided using Sotheby's consolidated effective tax rate for the period. On a pro-forma basis, assuming the current period-end Finance segment Leverage Ratio of 76.6%, the Finance segment LTM Return on Equity for the period ended June 30, 2015 would be 16.6%. This metric is not applicable for the LTM period ended June 30, 2014, as the debt funding of the Finance segment loan portfolio did not begin until February 2014. | |||
For three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the improvement in Finance segment gross profit reflects the continued growth of the client loan portfolio, which can be attributed to a number of factors, including an increase in the demand for art-related financing, the increased ability to fund loans through revolving credit facility borrowings, the relatively low nominal interest rate environment, and the improved global reach of Sotheby's art-financing business. Finance segment results for the six months ended June 30, 2015, are also favorably impacted by a $1.3 million collateral withdrawal fee earned in the first quarter of 2015. Intersegment revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were flat when compared to the prior year, as an increase in fees earned from the sale of term loan collateral through the Agency segment was offset by a lower balance of below target loans issued to Agency segment clients. The overall improvement in Finance segment gross profit is partially offset by the higher cost of revolving credit facility borrowings as management began the process of debt financing the loan portfolio after establishing the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility on February 13, 2014.
43#
Marketing Expenses
Marketing expenses are costs related to the promotion of the Sotheby’s brand and include corporate advertising, Sotheby’s lifestyle magazines, client service initiatives, and strategic sponsorships of and charitable donations to cultural institutions. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, marketing expenses increased $0.2 million (4%) and $1.1 million (14%), respectively, as a result of initiatives to enhance Sotheby's brand preeminence and accessibility, partially offset by a lower level of contributions to cultural institutions.
Salaries and Related Costs
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, salaries and related costs consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable / (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Full-time salaries | $ | 36,769 | $ | 38,069 | $ | 1,300 | 3 | % | |||||||
Incentive compensation expense | 33,228 | 33,023 | (205 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||
Leadership transition severance costs | 9,501 | — | (9,501 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Share-based payment expense | 9,582 | 6,648 | (2,934 | ) | (44 | %) | |||||||||
Payroll taxes | 6,379 | 6,250 | (129 | ) | (2 | %) | |||||||||
Employee benefits | 7,346 | 8,905 | 1,559 | 18 | % | ||||||||||
Other compensation expense | 5,377 | 4,938 | (439 | ) | (9 | %) | |||||||||
Total salaries and related costs | $ | 108,182 | $ | 97,833 | $ | (10,349 | ) | (11 | %) | ||||||
Favorable / (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Full-time salaries | $ | 73,545 | $ | 75,978 | $ | 2,433 | 3 | % | |||||||
Incentive compensation expense | 35,041 | 36,040 | 999 | 3 | % | ||||||||||
Leadership transition severance costs | 9,501 | — | (9,501 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Share-based payment expense | 15,235 | 12,895 | (2,340 | ) | (18 | %) | |||||||||
Payroll taxes | 11,985 | 12,842 | 857 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
Employee benefits | 16,249 | 15,585 | (664 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Other compensation expense | 9,556 | 10,249 | 693 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
Total salaries and related costs | $ | 171,112 | $ | 163,589 | $ | (7,523 | ) | (5 | %) | ||||||
Statistical Metric: | |||||||||||||||
Salaries and related costs as a % of total revenues | 35.1 | % | 33.2 | % | (1.9 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, changes in foreign currency exchange rates reduced salaries and related costs by $5.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively, when compared to the prior year periods. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, salaries and related costs increased $15.5 million (16%) and $16 million (10%) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.
See below for a detailed discussion of the significant factors impacting the comparison of the various elements of salaries and related costs between the current and prior periods.
Full-Time Salaries—For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, full-time salaries decreased $1.3 million (3%) and $2.4 million (3%), respectively, principally due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates ($2.1 million and $4 million, respectively) and savings resulting from the restructuring plan enacted in July 2014 (see "Restructuring Charges" below), partially offset by base salary increases and headcount reinvestments in the current year. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, full-time salaries increased $0.8 million (2%) and $1.5 million (2%) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.
44#
Incentive Compensation—Incentive compensation principally includes the expense associated with cash payments made under Sotheby's incentive compensation program. The amount of incentive compensation paid under this program is awarded based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee to the Board of Directors after assessing Sotheby's annual earnings, as measured by Adjusted EBITDA*. In addition, incentive compensation includes amounts awarded to employees for brokering certain eligible private sale transactions under a formula established by the Compensation Committee and, to a much lesser extent, amounts awarded to employees with respect to other selling activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the 3% decrease in incentive compensation expense is consistent with the decrease in Adjusted EBITDA* when compared to the prior year.
Leadership Transition Severance Costs—In the second quarter of 2015, in conjunction with Sotheby's leadership transition, Sotheby's incurred severance costs of $9.5 million associated with the termination of the employment of certain Executive Officers, including its Chief Operating Officer.
Share-Based Payment Expense—Share-based payment expense relates to the amortization of equity compensation awards such as performance share units, market-based share units, restricted stock units, restricted stock, and stock options. Equity compensation awards are generally granted annually in the first quarter of the year, primarily under Sotheby's incentive compensation program, with the annual award value generally dependent upon the level of Sotheby’s financial results for the prior year. The amount of compensation expense recognized for share-based payments is based on management’s estimate of the number of units or shares ultimately expected to vest as a result of employee service. In addition, for performance share units, the amount and timing of expense recognition is significantly impacted by management’s quarterly assessment of the likelihood and timing of achieving certain profitability targets.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, share-based payment expense increased $2.9 million (44%) and $2.3 million (18%), respectively, largely due to the accelerated recognition of $2.1 million of compensation expense in the second quarter of 2015 pursuant to the terms of the severance agreement with Sotheby's Chief Operating Officer, as well as higher amortization of CEO share-based payment awards. (See Note 12 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information related to Sotheby’s share-based compensation programs.)
Employee Benefits—Employee benefits include the cost of Sotheby’s retirement plans and health and welfare programs, as well as certain employee severance costs. Sotheby’s material retirement plans include defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans for its employees in the U.K. and defined contribution and deferred compensation plans for its U.S. employees.
Generally, the amount of employee benefit costs recognized in a period is dependent upon headcount and overall compensation levels, as well as Sotheby’s financial performance. Additionally, the level of expense related to Sotheby’s defined benefit pension plan in the U.K. is significantly influenced by interest rates, investment performance in the debt and equity markets, and actuarial assumptions. Also, the amount recorded in a period for Sotheby’s Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”) is dependent upon changes in the fair value of the DCP liability resulting from gains and losses in deemed participant investments. Gains in deemed participant investments increase the DCP liability and, therefore, increase employee benefit costs. Losses in deemed participant investments decrease the DCP liability and, therefore, decrease employee benefit costs. On a consolidated basis, cost increases (decreases) related to the DCP liability are largely offset by market gains (losses) in the trust assets related to the DCP liability, which are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements within other expense.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, employee benefit costs decreased $1.6 million (18%) primarily due to a decrease of $1.3 million in expense associated with the DCP as a result of a decline in the performance of deemed participant investments, a $0.6 million decrease in other employee severance costs, and favorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These factors are partially offset by higher pension costs in the U.K., including $0.6 million related to the defined benefit plan (see Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) and $0.3 million related to defined contribution plan profit-sharing accruals. Beginning in 2015, Sotheby's may contribute an annual discretionary amount to the U.K. defined contribution plan, depending on Sotheby's profitability.
___________________
* See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for a description of this non-GAAP financial measure.
45#
For the six months ended June 30, 2015, employee benefit costs increased $0.7 million (4%) primarily due to higher pension costs in the U.K., including $1.1 million related to the defined benefit plan (see Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), $0.6 million related to defined contribution plan profit-sharing accruals, and higher other employee severance costs. These increases are partially offset by a $1 million decrease in costs associated with the DCP and favorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
For the year ending December 31, 2015, the net cost associated with the U.K. defined benefit plan is expected to increase $2.3 million primarily due to a decrease in the assumption for the weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets (from 6.1% to 5.4%) and an increase in the required amortization of prior year actuarial losses. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Other Compensation Expense—Other compensation expense typically includes the cost of certain retention-based, new-hire and other employment arrangements, as well as the cost of temporary labor and overtime. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, other compensation expense decreased $0.7 million (7%) primarily due to a lower level of amortization expense associated with retention-based employment arrangements.
46#
General and Administrative Expenses
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, general and administrative expenses consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Professional fees: | |||||||||||||||
Operations | $ | 6,234 | $ | 6,176 | $ | (58 | ) | (1 | %) | ||||||
Legal and compliance | 3,735 | 4,310 | 575 | 13 | % | ||||||||||
Other | 4,057 | 3,207 | (850 | ) | (27 | %) | |||||||||
Total professional fees | 14,026 | 13,693 | (333 | ) | (2 | %) | |||||||||
Facilities-related expenses | 9,544 | 10,768 | 1,224 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Travel and entertainment | 7,707 | 7,278 | (429 | ) | (6 | %) | |||||||||
Telecommunication and technology | 2,249 | 2,247 | (2 | ) | — | % | |||||||||
Insurance | 1,668 | 1,556 | (112 | ) | (7 | %) | |||||||||
Other indirect expenses | 9,537 | 2,668 | (6,869 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Total general and administrative expenses | $ | 44,731 | $ | 38,210 | $ | (6,521 | ) | (17 | %) | ||||||
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Professional fees: | |||||||||||||||
Operations | $ | 10,851 | $ | 11,438 | $ | 587 | 5 | % | |||||||
Legal and compliance | 6,990 | 8,411 | 1,421 | 17 | % | ||||||||||
Other | 7,263 | 6,915 | (348 | ) | (5 | %) | |||||||||
Total professional fees | 25,104 | 26,764 | 1,660 | 6 | % | ||||||||||
Facilities-related expenses | 20,226 | 22,131 | 1,905 | 9 | % | ||||||||||
Travel and entertainment | 14,282 | 13,428 | (854 | ) | (6 | %) | |||||||||
Telecommunication and technology | 4,285 | 4,458 | 173 | 4 | % | ||||||||||
Insurance | 2,951 | 2,900 | (51 | ) | (2 | %) | |||||||||
Other indirect expenses | 12,612 | 5,861 | (6,751 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Total general and administrative expenses | $ | 79,460 | $ | 75,542 | $ | (3,918 | ) | (5 | %) | ||||||
* Represents a change in excess of 100%. | |||||||||||||||
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, changes in foreign currency exchange rates decreased general and administrative expenses by $2.4 million and $3.9 million, respectively, when compared to the prior periods. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, general and administrative expenses increased $8.9 million (23%) and $7.8 million (10%), respectively, during the periods.
See below for a detailed discussion of the significant operating factors impacting the comparison of the various elements of general and administrative expenses between the current and prior periods.
Professional fees (Operations)—Sotheby's incurs professional fees to outsource certain business functions such as catalogue production and its client contact management center, as well as for assistance with personnel recruiting, website maintenance and development, and other activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, this category of professional fees decreased $0.6 million (5%) primarily due to negotiated rate reductions related to outsourced functions and reduced usage of service providers in other areas.
Professional fees (Legal and Compliance)—Sotheby's incurs professional fees related to legal, audit and other compliance-related activities. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, this category of professional fees decreased $0.6 million (13%) and $1.4 million (17%), respectively, primarily due to a recovery of legal fees resulting from a favorable court ruling.
47#
Professional fees (Other)—Other professional fees include business consulting costs incurred to assist management in the analysis and development of business and operational strategies, Board of Director fees, and costs related to various administrative areas. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, this category of professional fees increased $0.9 million (27%) primarily due to strategic business consulting costs incurred in the second quarter of 2015.
Facilities-related expenses—Facilities-related expenses principally include rent expense, real estate taxes and other costs related to the operation, security and maintenance of Sotheby's worldwide premises. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, facilities-related expenses decreased $1.2 million (11%) and $1.9 million (9%), respectively, principally due to real estate tax rebates received in respect of Sotheby's London premises and favorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Other indirect expenses—Other indirect expenses include costs related to client goodwill gestures and claims, uncollectible accounts and other miscellaneous indirect costs. The increase in other indirect expenses during the current periods is primarily due to an unexpected authenticity claim related to property sold through Sotheby's several years ago. The comparison to the prior periods is also unfavorably influenced by a $0.8 million reduction to the Finance segment's allowance for credit losses recorded in the second quarter of 2014 as a result of better than anticipated loan loss rates.
CEO Separation and Transition Costs
In the first quarter of 2015, Sotheby's recognized $4.2 million in costs associated with the hiring of Thomas S. Smith, Jr. as its President and Chief Executive Officer which are classified within CEO Separation and Transition Costs. These costs principally relate to compensation of $3.1 million owed to Mr. Smith to replace incentive compensation that he expected to receive from his previous employer, consisting of a fully vested restricted stock unit award with a fair value of $2 million granted on March 31, 2015 and a $1.1 million cash payment due in September 2015. There is no required service period associated with this compensation. CEO Separation and Transition Costs also include approximately $1.1 million in recruitment and other professional fees associated with the CEO hiring process.
Restructuring Charges
On July 16, 2014, Sotheby's Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan (the "2014 Restructuring Plan") principally impacting Sotheby's operations in the United States and the U.K. The 2014 Restructuring Plan resulted in Restructuring Charges (net) of approximately $14.2 million in 2014, consisting of $13.9 million in employee termination benefits recognized in the second half of 2014 and approximately $0.3 million of lease exit costs recognized in the fourth quarter of 2014. Substantially all of the headcount reductions resulting from the 2014 Restructuring Plan have been completed.
For the three and six months ended June, 2015, Sotheby's recognized benefits in Restructuring Charges (net) of $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, related to adjustments to the accrual for employee termination benefits. As of June 30, 2015, Sotheby's has made payments of approximately $9.6 million related to the 2014 Restructuring Plan, and the related accrued liability has been reduced by $0.9 million as a result of foreign currency exchange rate changes. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2015, the remaining accrued liability related to the 2014 Restructuring Plan recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets within Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities was $2.8 million. This liability is expected to be settled through cash payments to be made in the third quarter of 2015.
Special Charges
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, Sotheby's recognized special charges of $18.6 million and $24.3 million, respectively, related to third party advisory, legal, and other professional service fees directly associated with issues related to shareholder activism, the resulting proxy contest with Third Point LLC ("Third Point"), and the litigation concerning Sotheby's former shareholder rights plan and the change in control provision in its credit agreement. Included in these amounts is $10 million for the reimbursement by Sotheby's of Third Point's documented, out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the proxy contest and the litigation concerning Sotheby's former shareholder rights plan. This reimbursement was part of a support agreement Sotheby's entered into with Third Point, Daniel S. Loeb, Olivier Reza, Harry J. Wilson and other entities affiliated with Third Point (together with Third Point, the “Third Point Entities”) on May 4, 2014 pursuant to which Sotheby's and Third Point settled the previously pending proxy contest for the election of directors (the "Support Agreement"). Pursuant to the Support Agreement, Mr. Loeb, Mr. Reza and Mr. Wilson (the “Third Point Nominees”) were appointed to Sotheby's Board of Directors. The Support Agreement also contains various other terms and provisions, including with respect to standstill and voting commitments entered into by Third Point, Third Point's withdrawal of the litigation concerning Sotheby's former shareholder rights plan, and the accelerated expiration of Sotheby's former shareholder rights plan.
48#
Net Interest Expense
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, net interest expense was relatively flat when compared to the prior year periods. However, for the year ending December 31, 2015 net interest expense is expected to decrease approximately $2.4 million when compared to 2014, due in large part to the refinancing of the mortgage on Sotheby's headquarters at 1334 York Avenue in New York. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below and Note 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
Income Tax Expense
The quarterly income tax provision is calculated using an estimated annual effective income tax rate for the period based on actual historical information and forward looking estimates. The estimated annual effective income tax rate may fluctuate due to changes in forecasted annual pre-tax income, changes in the jurisdictional mix of forecasted pre-tax income, and changes to actual or forecasted permanent book to tax differences (e.g., non-deductible expenses). Furthermore, the effective income tax rate may fluctuate as the result of positive or negative changes to the valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets, the impact of future tax settlements with federal, state or foreign tax authorities, or the impact of tax law changes. Management identifies items which are unusual and non-recurring in nature and treats these as discrete events. The tax effect of discrete items is booked entirely in the quarter in which the discrete event occurs.
As of June 30, 2015, management estimates that Sotheby’s annual effective income tax rate, excluding discrete items, will be approximately 35% as compared to its estimate of approximately 38% as of June 30, 2014. The decrease in the estimate of the annual effective income tax rate is primarily due to a reduction in state and local taxes as a result of legislation enacted during the current quarter, as discussed below, and, to a lesser extent, a change in the jurisdictional mix of Sotheby’s pre-tax income. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Sotheby’s effective income tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 is approximately 40%, as compared to an effective income tax rate of approximately 37% and 39% for the same periods in the prior year, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the current periods are higher than the 2015 estimated annual effective income tax rate and higher than the effective income tax rates for the prior periods primarily due to a discrete tax expense of approximately $4 million recorded in the second quarter to reflect the impact of New York tax legislation enacted during the period, as discussed in more detail below. The current year-to-date period also includes tax expense of $1.2 million associated with Sotheby’s share of the earnings of its equity investees (see “Equity in Earnings of Investees” below) and discrete tax expense of $1.1 million related to the conclusion of income tax audits.
Sotheby’s effective income tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 includes tax benefits related to previously unrecognized tax positions, as well as a discrete tax benefit related to deductions recorded in 2014 at U.S. federal, state and local tax rates, which together, were higher than Sotheby's 2014 estimated annual effective income tax rate. These benefits were more than offset by approximately $3.1 million of tax expense recorded in the first quarter of 2014 to reduce the value of certain deferred tax assets to reflect the enactment of New York State tax legislation during the quarter.
On April 13, 2015, New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo signed legislation that reforms several provisions of the state’s revised corporate franchise tax, including legislation that reforms business taxes in New York City, retroactively to January 1, 2015. The legislation reduced the amount of Sotheby’s taxable income apportioned to New York City, thereby reducing Sotheby’s state and local effective income tax rate. The discrete tax expense of approximately $4 million recorded in the second quarter of 2015 reduced the value of certain deferred tax assets to the amount that will be recognized in the future as a result of the reduction of the New York City effective income tax rate.
49#
Equity in Earnings of Investees
Sotheby's equity method investments include a 25% ownership interest in RM Sotheby's, which was acquired on February 18, 2015 (see Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), and a 50% ownership interest in Acquavella Modern Art ("AMA"). For the six months ended June 30, 2015, Sotheby's equity in earnings of investees increased by $2.7 million when compared to the prior year due to the earnings contributed by RM Sotheby's ($1.7 million) and an increase in earnings from AMA ($1 million).
Impact of Changes in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, foreign currency exchange rates had a net unfavorable impact of $3.3 million and $5.3 million, respectively, on Sotheby's operating income when compared to the prior periods, with revenues unfavorably impacted by $12.4 million and $20.5 million, respectively, and expenses favorably impacted by $9.1 million and $15.1 million, respectively.
USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
GAAP refers to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Included in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (or “MD&A”) are financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP and also on a non-GAAP basis. In MD&A, Sotheby’s presents Adjusted Expenses, Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, and Adjusted EBITDA Margin, which are supplemental financial measures that are not required by or presented in accordance with GAAP. Sotheby's definition of these non-GAAP financial measures is provided in the following paragraphs.
Adjusted Expenses is defined as total expenses excluding the cost of inventory sales, the cost of Finance revenues, CEO separation and transition costs, leadership transition severance costs, restructuring charges (net), and special charges. Adjusted Operating Income is defined as operating income excluding CEO separation and transition costs, leadership transition severance costs, restructuring charges (net), and special charges. Adjusted Net Income is defined as net income attributable to Sotheby's, excluding after-tax CEO separation and transition costs, leadership transition severance costs, restructuring charges (net), and special charges. Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share is defined as diluted earnings per share excluding the per share impact of CEO separation and transition costs, leadership transition severance costs, restructuring charges (net), and special charges. EBITDA is defined as net income attributable to Sotheby's, excluding income tax expense, interest expense, interest income, the cost of Finance revenues, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA excluding CEO separation and transition costs, leadership transition severance costs, special charges (net), and restructuring charges (net). EBITDA Margin is defined as EBITDA as a percentage of total revenues. Adjusted EBITDA Margin is defined as Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of total revenues.
Adjusted Expenses is used by the Board of Directors and management to assess Sotheby’s cost structure when compared to prior periods and on a forward-looking basis, particularly in evaluating performance against management's cost control initiatives. Accordingly, Adjusted Expenses allows investors to assess Sotheby's performance on the same basis as the Board of Directors and management. Adjusted Expenses provides insight into Sotheby's ongoing cost structure, absent the costs of funding the Finance segment loan portfolio, the volatility associated with the cost of inventory sales, which is unpredictable and can vary significantly from one period to the next, and the cost of unusual items.
Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, and Adjusted EBITDA Margin are important supplemental measures used by the Board of Directors and management in their financial and operational decision making processes, for internal reporting, and as part of Sotheby’s forecasting and budgeting processes, as they provide helpful measures of Sotheby’s core operations. These measures allow the Board of Directors and management to view operating trends, perform analytical comparisons, and benchmark performance between periods. In addition, incentive compensation is awarded by Sotheby’s Board of Directors after an assessment of annual earnings as measured by Adjusted EBITDA. Management also believes that these measures may be used by securities analysts, investors, financial institutions, and other interested parties in their evaluation of Sotheby's.
Management cautions users of Sotheby's financial statements that amounts presented in accordance with its definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies because not all companies and analysts calculate such measures in the same manner.
50#
The following is a reconciliation of total expenses to Adjusted Expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||
Total expenses | $ | 215,548 | $ | 205,386 | $ | 352,819 | $ | 358,106 | |||||||||
Subtract: Cost of inventory sales | 16,989 | 7,518 | 28,702 | 32,020 | |||||||||||||
Subtract: Cost of Finance revenues | 3,874 | 2,024 | 7,262 | 2,734 | |||||||||||||
Subtract: CEO separation and transition costs | 43 | — | 4,232 | — | |||||||||||||
Subtract: Leadership transition severance costs | 9,501 | — | 9,501 | — | |||||||||||||
Subtract: Restructuring charges, net | (530 | ) | — | (889 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Subtract: Special charges | — | 18,554 | — | 24,257 | |||||||||||||
Adjusted Expenses | $ | 185,671 | — | $ | 177,290 | $ | 304,011 | $ | 299,095 | ||||||||
The following is a reconciliation of operating income to Adjusted Operating Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 116,458 | $ | 130,431 | $ | 134,862 | $ | 134,522 | ||||||||
Add: CEO separation and transition costs | 43 | — | 4,232 | — | ||||||||||||
Add: Leadership transition severance costs | 9,501 | — | 9,501 | — | ||||||||||||
Add: Restructuring charges, net | (530 | ) | — | (889 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Add: Special charges | — | 18,554 | — | 24,257 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted Operating Income | $ | 125,472 | $ | 148,985 | $ | 147,706 | $ | 158,779 | ||||||||
The following is a reconciliation of net income attributable to Sotheby's to Adjusted Net Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 67,572 | $ | 77,632 | $ | 72,774 | $ | 71,518 | ||||||||
Add: CEO separation and transition costs, net of tax | 118 | — | 2,564 | — | ||||||||||||
Add: Leadership transition severance costs, net of tax | 5,758 | — | 5,758 | — | ||||||||||||
Add: Restructuring charges (net), net of tax | (387 | ) | — | (612 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Add: Special charges, net of tax | — | 10,204 | — | 13,341 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted Net Income | $ | 73,061 | $ | 87,836 | $ | 80,484 | $ | 84,859 | ||||||||
The following is a reconciliation of diluted earnings per share to Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.96 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.01 | ||||||||
Add: CEO separation and transition costs, per share | 0.01 | — | 0.04 | — | ||||||||||||
Add: Leadership transition severance costs, per share | 0.08 | — | 0.08 | — | ||||||||||||
Add: Restructuring charges (net), per share | (0.01 | ) | — | (0.01 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Add: Special charges, per share | — | 0.15 | — | 0.19 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.26 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 1.20 | ||||||||
51#
The following is a reconciliation of net income attributable to Sotheby's to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 67,572 | $ | 77,632 | $ | 72,774 | $ | 71,518 | |||||||
Add: Income tax expense | 42,789 | 45,344 | 46,713 | 45,675 | |||||||||||
Add: Income tax expense related to equity investees | — | 188 | — | 314 | |||||||||||
Subtract: Interest income | 630 | 402 | 759 | 818 | |||||||||||
Add: Interest expense | 9,074 | 8,768 | 17,735 | 17,551 | |||||||||||
Add: Cost of Finance revenues | 3,874 | 2,024 | 7,262 | 2,734 | |||||||||||
Add: Depreciation and amortization | 4,781 | 5,066 | 9,563 | 10,213 | |||||||||||
EBITDA | 127,460 | 138,620 | 153,288 | 147,187 | |||||||||||
Add: CEO separation and transition costs, net | 43 | — | 4,232 | — | |||||||||||
Add: Leadership transition severance costs | 9,501 | — | 9,501 | — | |||||||||||
Add: Restructuring charges, net | (530 | ) | — | (889 | ) | — | |||||||||
Add: Special charges, net | — | 18,554 | — | 24,257 | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 136,474 | $ | 157,174 | $ | 166,132 | $ | 171,444 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 AND 2014
This discussion should be read in conjunction with Sotheby’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, total cash and cash equivalents decreased $80.1 million to $613.7 million, as compared to a decrease of $144.9 million to $576.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily due to the factors discussed below.
Net Cash Used by Operating Activities—Sotheby's is predominantly an agency business that collects and remits cash on behalf of its clients. Accordingly, the net amount of cash provided or used in a period by Sotheby's operating activities is significantly influenced by the timing of auction and private sale settlements. As discussed in Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, under Sotheby’s standard auction payment terms, payments from buyers are due no more than 30 days from the sale date and payments to consignors are due 35 days from the sale date. Accordingly, it is not unusual for Sotheby's to hold significant balances of consignor net sale proceeds at the end of a quarterly accounting period that are disbursed soon thereafter. Additionally, Sotheby's sometimes provides extended payment terms to auction and private sale buyers and the level of such extended payment terms for auctions can vary considerably from selling season to selling season. In certain of these situations, the consignor may be paid the net sale proceeds before payment is collected from the buyer, with the collection from the buyer sometimes occurring after the current balance sheet date. The amount of net cash provided or used by Sotheby's operating activities in a reporting period is also a function of its net income or loss, the timing of payments made to vendors, the timing of compensation-related payments, and the timing of the collection and/or payment of tax-related receivables and payables.
Net cash used by operating activities of $66.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is principally the result of net cash outflows of $112.8 million associated with the settlement of auction and private sale transactions during the period. This net cash outflow is particularly influenced by the payment of net sale proceeds to certain consignors for property sold in Sotheby's second quarter auctions in London and New York and first quarter auctions in London in advance of collecting the purchase price from the buyer. Cash flows from operating activities are also impacted by the funding of approximately $62 million of 2014 incentive compensation payments and $55 million used to fund the acquisition of property sold at auctions in the second quarter of 2015. Sotheby's expects to receive payment for these items in the second half of 2015, at which point title will pass to the buyers and the sales will be recognized in Sotheby's financial statements. These net cash outflows are partially offset by Sotheby's net income for the period. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Net cash used by operating activities of $63.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was principally the result of net cash outflows of $141.6 million associated with the settlement of auction and private sale transactions, as sales proceeds collected from buyers late in 2013 were paid to consignors early in 2014. Cash flows from operating activities were also impacted by $34.5 million used to fund acquisitions of property acquired for resale and guaranteed property that failed to sell at auction. These net cash outflows were partially offset by Sotheby's net income for the period.
52#
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities—Net cash used by investing activities of $136 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is principally the result of the net funding of client loans of $98.7 million and Sotheby's acquisition of a 25% ownership interest in RM Auctions for $30.7 million in the first quarter of 2015 (see Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
Net cash used by investing activities of $78.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was principally the result of cash used to fund client loans, including a $107 million loan issued to one borrower in the second quarter of 2014. Net cash used by investing activities for the period was also the result of a $24.8 million increase in restricted cash related to certain foreign jurisdictions where there is a legal requirement for auction houses to maintain consignor funds in segregated accounts.
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities—Net cash provided by financing activities of $119.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is largely due to $148 million in net borrowings under the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility, partially offset by dividend and dividend equivalent payments of $16.4 million, and the funding of employee tax obligations related to share-based payments of $8.9 million.
Net cash used by financing activities of $6.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was largely due to the payment of a $300 million special dividend, Common Stock repurchases of $25 million, quarterly dividend payments of $13.8 million, and the funding of employee tax obligations related to share-based payments ($11.8 million), almost entirely offset by $345 million of borrowings under the Finance segment's revolving credit facility.
53#
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The following table summarizes Sotheby’s material contractual obligations and commitments as of June 30, 2015 (in thousands of dollars):
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less Than One Year | 1 to 3 Years | 3 to 5 Years | After 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Debt (a): | |||||||||||||||||||
York Property Mortgage: | |||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments | $ | 218,609 | $ | 6,542 | $ | 15,336 | $ | 16,695 | $ | 180,036 | |||||||||
Interest payments | 89,440 | 6,294 | 15,115 | 16,035 | 51,996 | ||||||||||||||
Sub-total | 308,049 | 12,836 | 30,451 | 32,730 | 232,032 | ||||||||||||||
2022 Senior Notes: | |||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments | 300,000 | — | — | — | 300,000 | ||||||||||||||
Interest payments | 118,125 | 15,750 | 31,500 | 31,500 | 39,375 | ||||||||||||||
Sub-total | 418,125 | 15,750 | 31,500 | 31,500 | 339,375 | ||||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility borrowings | 593,000 | — | — | — | 593,000 | ||||||||||||||
Total debt and interest payments | 1,319,174 | 28,586 | 61,951 | 64,230 | 1,164,407 | ||||||||||||||
Other commitments: | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations (b) | 90,254 | 17,726 | 24,795 | 10,446 | 37,287 | ||||||||||||||
Compensation arrangements (c) | 27,424 | 16,571 | 8,173 | 2,680 | — | ||||||||||||||
Auction guarantees (d) | 16,180 | 16,180 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Unfunded loan commitments (e) | 10,220 | 10,220 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Uncertain tax positions (f) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total other commitments | 144,078 | 60,697 | 32,968 | 13,126 | 37,287 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,463,252 | $ | 89,283 | $ | 94,919 | $ | 77,356 | $ | 1,201,694 | |||||||||
(a) | On July 1, 2015, Sotheby's entered into a seven-year, $325 million mortgage loan (the "New Mortgage") to refinance the York Property Mortgage. (See Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.) |
(b) | These amounts represent the undiscounted future minimum rental commitments under non-cancellable operating leases. |
(c) | These amounts represent the remaining commitment for future salaries and other cash compensation, excluding any participation in Sotheby’s incentive compensation and share-based payment programs, related to compensation arrangements with certain senior employees. (See Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.) |
(d) | Represents the amount of auction guarantees outstanding net of amounts advanced, if any, as of June 30, 2015. (See Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to auction guarantees.) |
(e) | Represents unfunded commitments to extend additional credit through Sotheby's Finance segment. (See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to Sotheby's Finance segment loan portfolio.) |
(f) | Excludes the $22.2 million liability recorded for uncertain tax positions that would be settled by cash payments to the respective taxing authorities, which are classified as long-term liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2015. This liability is excluded from the table above because management is unable to make reliable estimates of the period of settlement with the respective taxing authorities. (See Note 17 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information related to uncertain tax positions.) |
54#
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
For information related to off-balance sheet arrangements see: (i) Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses unfunded Finance segment loan commitments and (ii) Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses auction guarantees.
CONTINGENCIES
For information related to contingencies see: (i) Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses legal contingencies, (ii) Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses auction guarantees, and (iii) Note 17 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses income tax contingencies.
UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS
For information related to uncertain tax positions, see Note 17 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview—Sotheby's continues to have strong liquidity with significant cash balances and borrowing capacity available under its revolving credit facility (see below for borrowing capacity details). As of June 30, 2015, cash and cash equivalents totaled $613.7 million, with $148.6 million held in the U.S. and $465.1 million held by foreign subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2015, Sotheby's also held $37.1 million of restricted cash that is almost entirely in certain foreign jurisdictions where there is a legal requirement for auction houses to maintain consignor funds in segregated accounts. After taking into account funds held that are due to consignors, management estimates that approximately $462 million of Sotheby's total cash and cash equivalents is available to support its capital needs, which include its current business requirements, the pursuit of business opportunities and growth initiatives, the execution of its share repurchase program, as discussed below, and to ensure appropriate liquidity for a market downturn that could occur due to the cyclical nature of the global art market. The current focus of Sotheby’s cash investment policy is to preserve principal and ensure liquidity. Accordingly, Sotheby's cash balances are primarily invested in the highest rated overnight deposits.
On July 1, 2015, Sotheby's entered into a seven-year, $325 million mortgage loan to refinance the existing mortgage on its headquarters at 1334 York Avenue in New York. After the repayment of the existing mortgage and the funding of all closing costs, reserves, and expenses associated with the refinancing, Sotheby's received net cash proceeds of approximately $98 million. The interest rate for the new mortgage is one month LIBOR plus a spread of 2.25%. In connection with the new mortgage, Sotheby's entered into interest rate protection agreements secured by 1334 York Avenue, consisting of a two year swap and a five year collar, both of which have a notional amount equal to the applicable principal balance of the new mortgage and have an identical amortization schedule. These interest rate protection agreements effectively hedge the LIBOR rate on the entire outstanding principal balance of the new mortgage at a rate equal to 0.877% per annum for the first two years and no more than 3.75% per annum for the remainder of the seven-year term. Therefore, after taking into account the interest rate protection agreements, the interest rate for the first two years of the new mortgage will be approximately 3.13% per annum and no more than 6% per annum for the remainder of the seven-year term. (See Note 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information with respect to the mortgage on 1334 York Avenue.)
On August 6, 2015, Sotheby’s Board of Directors approved an increase of $125 million to Sotheby's remaining share repurchase authorization of $125 million, resulting in a total share repurchase authorization of $250 million. The Board of Directors has concluded that this share repurchase program, which is expected to be funded from existing cash balances, provides a balance between preserving capital for growth, downside risk protection, and returning available capital to shareholders. Sotheby’s intends to repurchase $125 million of its Common Stock from shareholders in the near term via an Accelerated Share Repurchase (“ASR”) Program. Management expects that the balance of the share repurchase program will be executed in the next 12 to 18 months, via open market transactions and/or additional ASR Programs. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Based on its current projections and planned uses of foreign cash balances, management believes that foreign earnings accumulated through December 31, 2013 will be indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. and will not be needed to fund Sotheby's U.S. operations or commitments. However, based on these plans and projections, for years beginning in 2014, management believes that the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries will not be indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
55#
Revolving Credit Facilities—Sotheby's and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries are parties to a credit agreement with an international syndicate of lenders led by General Electric Capital Corporation, which provides for separate dedicated revolving credit facilities for the Agency segment (the “Agency Credit Agreement”) and the Finance segment (the “Finance Credit Agreement”) (collectively, the “Credit Agreements”). On June 15, 2015, the Credit Agreements were amended to increase the commitments under the Finance Credit Agreement in order to support the continued growth of the Finance segment's loan portfolio and to extend the maturity date of the Credit Agreements by one year to August 22, 2020.
The Agency Credit Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving credit facility the proceeds of which may be used primarily for the working capital and other general corporate needs of the Agency segment. The Finance Credit Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving credit facility the proceeds of which may be used primarily for the working capital and other general corporate needs of the Finance segment, including the funding of client loans. The Credit Agreements allow Sotheby's to transfer the proceeds of borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities between the Agency and Finance segments.
The maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements, which is subject to a borrowing base, is approximately $1.335 billion, with $300 million committed to the Agency segment and $1.035 billion committed to the Finance segment, including a $485 million increase that was secured for the Finance segment in conjunction with the June 2015 amendment. The borrowing capacity of the Agency Credit Agreement includes a $50 million incremental revolving credit facility with higher advance rates against certain assets and higher commitment and borrowing costs (the "Incremental Facility"). As a result of the June 2015 amendment of the Credit Agreements, the Incremental Facility has a maturity date of August 22, 2016, which may be extended for an additional 365 days on an annual basis with the consent of the lenders who agree to extend their commitments under the Incremental Facility. Prior to the amendment, the maturity date of the Incremental Facility was August 21, 2015.
The Credit Agreements have a sub-limit of $400 million for borrowings in the U.K. and Hong Kong, with up to $50 million available for foreign borrowings under the Agency Credit Agreement and up to $350 million available for foreign borrowings under the Finance Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreements also include an accordion feature, which allows Sotheby’s to seek an increase to the combined borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements until February 23, 2020 by an amount not to exceed $150 million in the aggregate. Though new commitments would need to be obtained, the uncommitted accordion feature permits Sotheby’s to seek an increase to the aggregate commitments of either or both of the Agency and Finance credit facilities under an expedited arrangement process.
The borrowing base under the Agency Credit Agreement is determined by a calculation that is primarily based upon a percentage of the carrying values of certain auction guarantee advances, a percentage of the carrying value of certain inventory, a percentage of the carrying value of certain extended payment term receivables arising from auction or private sale transactions, and the fair value of certain of Sotheby's trademarks. The borrowing base under the Finance Credit Agreement is determined by a calculation that is primarily based upon a percentage of the carrying values of certain loans in the Finance segment loan portfolio and the fair value of certain of Sotheby's trademarks. The borrowing base of the Incremental Facility is determined by a calculation that is based on a percentage of the carrying value of certain inventory and the fair value of certain of Sotheby's trademarks.
The obligations under the Credit Agreements are cross-guaranteed and cross-collateralized. Domestic borrowers are jointly and severally liable for all obligations under the Credit Agreements and, subject to certain limitations, borrowers in the U.K. and Sotheby's Hong Kong Limited, are jointly and severally liable for all obligations of the foreign borrowers under the Credit Agreements. In addition, the obligations of the borrowers under the Credit Agreements are guaranteed by certain of their subsidiaries. Sotheby's obligations under the Credit Agreements are secured by liens on all or substantially all of the personal property of the entities that are borrowers and guarantors under the Credit Agreements.
The Credit Agreements contain certain customary affirmative and negative covenants including, but not limited to, limitations on capital expenditures, a $600 million limitation on net outstanding auction guarantees (i.e., auction guarantees less the impact of related risk and reward sharing arrangements), and limitations on the use of proceeds from borrowings under the Credit Agreements. However, the Credit Agreements do not limit dividend payments and Common Stock repurchases provided that, both before and after giving effect thereto: (i) there are no events of default, (ii) the aggregate available borrowing capacity equals or exceeds $100 million, and (iii) the Liquidity Amount, as defined in the Credit Agreements, equals or exceeds $200 million. The Credit Agreements also contain certain financial covenants, which are only applicable during certain defined compliance periods. These financial covenants were not applicable for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2015.
Since August 2009, Sotheby’s has incurred aggregate fees of approximately $21.2 million in conjunction with the establishment of and subsequent amendments to its credit agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation. These fees are being amortized on a straight-line basis through the August 22, 2020 maturity date of the Credit Agreements.
56#
The following tables summarize information relevant to the Credit Agreements as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
As of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 300,000 | $ | 1,035,000 | $ | 1,335,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 221,812 | $ | 622,849 | $ | 844,661 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 593,000 | $ | 593,000 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 221,812 | $ | 29,849 | $ | 251,661 | ||||||
Average Borrowings Outstanding: | ||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2015 | $ | — | $ | 538,868 | $ | 538,868 | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2015 | $ | — | $ | 506,052 | $ | 506,052 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs: | ||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2015 | $ | 751 | $ | 3,874 | $ | 4,625 | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2015 | $ | 1,457 | $ | 7,262 | $ | 8,719 | ||||||
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 300,000 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 850,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 237,830 | $ | 519,255 | $ | 757,085 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 445,000 | $ | 445,000 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 237,830 | $ | 74,255 | $ | 312,085 | ||||||
Average borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 306,448 | $ | 306,448 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs | $ | 2,240 | $ | 8,740 | $ | 10,980 | ||||||
As of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 150,000 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 600,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 61,647 | $ | 451,057 | $ | 512,704 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 345,000 | $ | 345,000 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 61,647 | $ | 105,000 | $ | 166,647 | ||||||
Average Borrowings Outstanding: | ||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2014 | $ | — | $ | 284,176 | $ | 284,176 | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2014 | $ | — | $ | 188,591 | $ | 188,591 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs: | ||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2014 | $ | 371 | $ | 2,024 | $ | 2,395 | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2014 | $ | 968 | $ | 2,734 | $ | 3,702 | ||||||
(a) In August 2014, the Credit Agreements were amended and restated to, among other things, increase the maximum borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements from $600 million to $850 million. In June 2015, the Credit Agreements were amended to, among other things, increase the maximum borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements from $850 million to approximately $1.335 billion.
(b) The available borrowing capacity is calculated as the borrowing base less borrowings outstanding.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, borrowing costs related to the Finance Credit Agreement include interest of $3.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively, and fee amortization of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, borrowing costs related to the Finance Credit Agreement include interest of $6.8 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and fee amortization of $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, borrowing costs related to the Finance Credit Agreement include interest of $7.7 million and fee amortization of $1 million. Such borrowing costs are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements as the Cost of Finance Revenues. The weighted average cost of borrowing related to the Finance Credit Agreement was approximately 2.9% for all periods presented.
57#
Borrowing costs related to the Agency Credit Agreement, which include interest and fee amortization, are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statements as Interest Expense.
Assessment of Liquidity and Capital Requirements—Sotheby's has separate capital structures and financial policies for its Agency and Finance segments. The Agency segment generally relies on existing cash balances (including amounts collected on behalf of and owed to consignors), operating cash flows, and revolving credit facility borrowings, if needed, to meet its liquidity and capital requirements. The timing and extent of any revolving credit facility borrowings by the Agency segment is dependent upon a number of factors including, but not limited to, the cyclical nature of the global art market, the seasonality of the art auction market, the timing of auction and private sale settlements, the potential funding of auction guarantees, the pursuit of business opportunities and growth initiatives, and the geographic mix of cash and cash equivalent balances.
The Finance segment predominantly relies on revolving credit facility borrowings to fund client loans. To a lesser extent, cash balances are also used to fund a portion of the Finance segment loan portfolio, as appropriate. The timing and extent of revolving credit facility borrowings by the Finance segment is dependent upon a number of factors including, but not limited to, the demand for art-related financing, which can be significantly influenced by overall economic conditions and by the often unpredictable financial requirements of owners of major art collections, the timing of the funding of new client loans, and the timing of the settlement of existing client loans.
Sotheby’s short-term operating needs and capital requirements include the funding of net sales proceeds to consignors when unmatched extended payment terms are granted to auction and private sale buyers (see Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), the potential funding of auction guarantees, the funding of potential inventory purchases, the funding of client loans, the potential repayment of revolving credit facility borrowings, the funding of capital expenditures, the funding of possible business initiatives and/or investments, the payment of quarterly dividends, and the funding of Common Stock repurchases, as well as the funding of the other short-term commitments due on or before June 30, 2016, as summarized in the table of contractual obligations and commitments above. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Sotheby’s long-term operating needs and capital requirements include the funding of net sales proceeds to consignors when unmatched extended payment terms are granted to auction and private sale buyers (see Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), the potential funding of auction guarantees, the funding of potential inventory purchases, the funding of client loans, the repayment of revolving credit facility borrowings, the funding of capital expenditures, the funding of possible business initiatives and/or investments, the payment of quarterly dividends, and the funding of potential Common Stock repurchases, as well as the funding of the presently anticipated long-term contractual obligations and commitments summarized in the table of contractual obligations and commitments above. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Management believes that operating cash flows, existing cash balances and revolving credit facility borrowings will be adequate to meet Sotheby’s anticipated short-term and long-term commitments, operating needs and capital requirements through the August 22, 2020 expiration of the Credit Agreements. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
FUTURE IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
See Note 19 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued accounting standards.
PREMISES UPDATE
In 2013 and 2014, management performed a review of its real estate holdings, including the York Property in New York and the New Bond Street premises in London. The results of this review will be further evaluated by the Board in consultation with Sotheby's new CEO after taking into account the strategic and operating requirements for these locations.
58#
LEGISLATION
In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law in the U.S. This legislation significantly changed the banking and financial institution regulatory structure and impacted the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of such financial institutions. Management continues to review the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act as they are finalized, and to assess its impact on Sotheby’s operations. This legislation has not had, nor does management believe it will have, a material impact on Sotheby's business. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Over the past year, there have been a number of Federal and State policy changes that impact the import, sale and export of objects containing ivory and other endangered species material. Sotheby’s continues to engage with Federal and State legislators and regulators to ensure the preservation of the existing exemption for antique artworks, furniture and other collectibles containing such material. Although Sotheby’s faces some new limitations in its ability to transact with property containing endangered species, management does not believe that the changes effected to date will have a material impact on Sotheby’s business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward looking statements; as such term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, relating to future events and the financial performance of Sotheby’s. Such statements are only predictions and involve risks and uncertainties, resulting in the possibility that the actual events or performance will differ materially from such predictions. Major factors which could cause the actual results to differ materially from the predicted results in the forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors listed below under Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” which are not ranked in any particular order.
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Sotheby's continually evaluates the market risk associated with its financial instruments in the normal course of its business. As of June 30, 2015, Sotheby's material financial instruments include: (i) cash and cash equivalents, (ii) restricted cash, (iii) notes receivable, (iv) credit facility borrowings, (v) the York Property Mortgage, (vi) long-term debt, (vii) the DCP liability and related trust assets, and (viii) outstanding forward exchange contracts. (See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to notes receivable. See Note 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to credit facility borrowings, the York Property Mortgage, and long-term debt.)
Management believes that the interest rate risk associated with its financial instruments is minimal as a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in interest rates is immaterial to its cash flow, earnings, and the fair value of its financial instruments. As of June 30, 2015, a hypothetical 10% strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to all other currencies would result in a decrease or increase in Sotheby's cash balances of approximately $56.6 million.
Sotheby’s utilizes forward exchange contracts to hedge cash flow exposures related to foreign currency exchange rate movements, which primarily arise from short-term foreign currency denominated intercompany balances and, to a much lesser extent, foreign currency denominated client payable balances, as well as foreign currency denominated auction guarantee obligations. Such forward exchange contracts are typically short-term with settlement dates less than six months from their inception. Additionally, on rare occasions, Sotheby’s may purchase foreign currency option contracts to hedge risks associated with foreign currency denominated client payable balances. All derivative financial instruments are entered into by Sotheby’s global treasury function, which is responsible for monitoring and managing Sotheby's exposure to foreign currency exchange rate movements. As of June 30, 2015, the notional value of outstanding forward exchange contracts was $98.1 million. Notional values do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities of Sotheby’s, but are used to calculate cash settlements under outstanding forward exchange contracts. Sotheby’s is exposed to credit-related risks in the event of nonperformance by the three counterparties to its outstanding forward exchange contracts. Sotheby’s does not expect any of these counterparties to fail to meet their obligations, given their high short-term (A1/P1) credit ratings.
59#
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2015, the Company has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) were effective as of June 30, 2015.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For information related to legal proceedings, see Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
Sotheby's operating results and liquidity are significantly influenced by a number of risk factors, many of which are not within its control. These factors, which are not ranked in any particular order, are discussed below.
The global economy and the financial markets and political conditions of various countries may negatively affect Sotheby's business and clients, as well as the supply of and demand for works of art.
The international art market is influenced over time by the overall strength and stability of the global economy and the financial markets of various countries, although this correlation may not be immediately evident. In addition, global political conditions and world events may affect Sotheby's business through their effect on the economies of various countries, as well as on the willingness of potential buyers and sellers to purchase and sell art in the wake of economic uncertainty. Sotheby's business can be particularly influenced by the economies, financial markets and political conditions of the U.S., the U.K., China, and the other major countries or territories of Europe and Asia (including the Middle East). Accordingly, weakness in those economies and financial markets can adversely affect the supply of and demand for works of art and Sotheby's business. Furthermore, global political conditions may also influence the enactment of legislation that could adversely impact Sotheby's business.
Government laws and regulations may restrict or limit Sotheby's business or impact the value of its real estate assets.
Many of Sotheby's activities are subject to laws and regulations including, but not limited to, import and export regulations, cultural property regulations, data protection and privacy laws, anti-money laundering laws, antitrust laws, copyright and resale royalty laws, laws and regulations involving sales, use, value-added and other indirect taxes, and regulations related to the use of real estate. In addition, Sotheby's is subject to local auction regulations, such as New York City Auction Regulations Subchapter M of Title 6 §§ 2-121-2-125, et. seq. Such regulations currently do not impose a material impediment to the worldwide business of Sotheby's, but do affect the art market generally. A material adverse change in such regulations, such as the American Royalties Too Act of 2014 introduced in the U.S. Congress, which would impose a 5% resale royalty (with a cap of $35,000) on sales of art through large auction houses, could affect Sotheby's business. Additionally, export and import laws and cultural property ownership laws could affect the availability of certain kinds of property for sale at Sotheby's principal auction locations, increase the cost of moving property to such locations, or expose Sotheby's to legal claims or government inquiries.
60#
Foreign currency exchange rate movements can significantly impact Sotheby's results of operations and financial condition.
Sotheby's has operations throughout the world. Approximately 59% of Sotheby's total revenues were earned outside of the U.S. in 2014, including 29% of its total revenues earned in the U.K. Additionally, Sotheby's has significant assets and liabilities denominated in the Pound Sterling, the Euro, and the Swiss Franc. Revenues, expenses, gains, and losses recorded in foreign currencies are translated using the monthly average exchange rates prevailing during the period in which they are recognized. Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Accordingly, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly for the Pound Sterling, the Euro, and the Swiss Franc can significantly impact Sotheby's results of operations and financial condition.
Competition in the international art market is intense and may adversely impact Sotheby's results of operations.
Sotheby's competes with other auctioneers and art dealers to obtain valuable consignments to offer for sale either at auction or through private sale. The level of competition is intense and can adversely impact Sotheby's ability to obtain valuable consignments for sale, as well as the commission margins achieved on such consignments.
Sotheby's cannot be assured of the amount and quality of property consigned for sale, which may cause significant variability in its financial results.
The amount and quality of property consigned for sale is influenced by a number of factors not within Sotheby's control. Many major consignments, and specifically single-owner sale consignments, often become available as a result of the death or financial or marital difficulties of the owner, all of which are unpredictable and may cause significant variability in Sotheby's financial results from period to period.
The demand for art is unpredictable, which may cause significant variability in Sotheby's results of operations.
The demand for art is influenced not only by overall economic conditions, but also by changing trends in the art market as to which collecting categories and artists are most sought after and by the collecting preferences of individual collectors, all of which are difficult to predict and which may adversely impact the ability of Sotheby's to obtain and sell consigned property, potentially causing significant variability in Sotheby's results from period to period.
The loss of key personnel could adversely impact Sotheby's ability to compete.
Sotheby's is largely a service business in which the ability of its employees to develop and maintain relationships with potential sellers and buyers of works of art is essential to its success. Moreover, Sotheby's business is unique, making it important to retain key specialists and members of management. Accordingly, Sotheby's business is highly dependent upon its success in attracting and retaining qualified personnel.
The business plans and strategic initiatives being implemented by Sotheby's may not succeed.
Sotheby's future operating results are dependent, in part, on management's success in implementing its business plans and strategic initiatives. The inability of Sotheby's to successfully implement its business plans and strategic initiatives could result in, among other things, the loss of clients, the impairment of assets, and inefficiencies from operating in new and emerging markets. Also, Sotheby's short-term operating results and liquidity could be unfavorably impacted by the implementation of its business plans and strategic initiatives.
Sotheby's joint venture and wholly-owned subsidiary in China are foreign-invested enterprises under Chinese law. As such, enforcement of certain of Sotheby's rights within these entities are subject to approval from the Chinese government, which could limit the ability of the entities to operate and succeed.
Sotheby's operates an equity joint venture with Beijing GeHua Art Company in China and, in 2014, established a wholly-owned subsidiary in China after obtaining the license required to operate as a Foreign-Invested Commercial Enterprise. Because these entities are foreign-invested enterprises under Chinese law, enforcement of certain of Sotheby's rights within these entities is subject to approval from the Chinese government. For example, all changes in ownership and constitution of the joint venture will be subject to approval by the Chinese government, including in the event Sotheby's is seeking to terminate the joint venture agreement, exercise its put option, or wind-up the joint venture. Accordingly, Sotheby's ability to successfully operate its businesses in China could be constrained by the Chinese government and other unforeseen circumstances.
61#
Sotheby's capital allocation and financial policies may impact its liquidity, financial condition, market capitalization and business, and Sotheby's ongoing ability to return capital to its shareholders (and the size and timing of such return) is subject to ongoing business variables.
The actions taken by management based on its review of Sotheby's capital allocation and financial policies may impact its current and future liquidity, financial condition, market capitalization, and business. In addition, the amount and timing of any potential return of capital to shareholders depends on various factors, including the amount of excess cash generated by the business in the future, the ability to continue to debt finance the Finance segment loan portfolio, the business initiatives contemplated and implemented by management, and the amount of capital that may be required to support Sotheby’s future liquidity needs, among other factors.
A breach of the security measures protecting Sotheby's global network of information systems and those of certain third-party service providers utilized by Sotheby's may occur.
Sotheby's is dependent on a global network of information systems to conduct its business and is committed to maintaining a strong infrastructure to secure these systems. As part of its information systems infrastructure, Sotheby's relies, to a certain extent, upon third-party service providers to perform services related to its live auction bidding platform BIDnowTM, retail wine e-commerce, video broadcasting, website content distribution, and SAP hosting, as well as the live auction streaming and bidding via eBay's Live Auctions channel that commenced in April 2015. While these third-party service providers offer unique and specialized information security measures, certain elements of Sotheby's global information system security are outside management's direct control due to the use of these service providers. These third-party service providers are contractually obligated to host and maintain the service in a professional manner, in accordance with the rules and standards generally accepted within the industry. This includes conventional security measures such as firewall, password and encryption protection, breach notification requirements, and PCI practices for credit card processing services. A breach of the security measures protecting Sotheby's information systems could adversely impact its operations, reputation, and brand.
Sotheby's business continuity plans may not be effective in addressing the impact of unexpected events that could impact its business.
Sotheby's inability to successfully implement its business continuity plans in the wake of an unexpected event, such as an act of God or a terrorist attack occurring near one of its major selling and/or sourcing offices and/or any other unexpected event, could disrupt its ability to operate and adversely impact its operations.
Sotheby's relies on a small number of clients who make a significant contribution to its revenues, profitability, and operating cash flows.
Sotheby's relies on a small number of clients who make a significant contribution to its revenues, profitability, and operating cash flows. Accordingly, Sotheby's revenues, profitability, and operating cash flows are highly dependent upon its ability to develop and maintain relationships with this small group of clients, as well as the financial strength of these clients.
Subject to management approval under Sotheby's internal corporate governance policy, Sotheby's may pay a consignor the net sale proceeds from an auction or private sale before payment is collected from the buyer and/or may allow the buyer to take possession of purchased property before payment is received. In these situations, Sotheby's is exposed to losses in the event the buyer does not make payment.
Under the standard terms and conditions of its auction and private sales, Sotheby's is not obligated to pay the consignor for property that has not been paid for by the buyer. However, in certain instances and subject to management approval under Sotheby's internal corporate governance policy, the consignor may be paid the net sale proceeds before payment is collected from the buyer while Sotheby's retains possession of the property. In such situations, if the buyer does not make payment, Sotheby's will take title to the property, but could be exposed to losses if the value of the property declines. In certain other situations and subject to management approval under Sotheby's internal corporate governance policy, the buyer is allowed to take possession of purchased property before making payment. In these situations, Sotheby's is liable to the seller for the net sale proceeds whether or not the buyer makes payment and would incur losses in the event of buyer default. (See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information about auction and private sale receivables.)
62#
Sotheby's ability to collect auction receivables may be adversely impacted by buyers from emerging markets, as well as by the banking and foreign currency laws and regulations, and judicial systems of the countries in which it operates and in which its clients reside.
Sotheby's operates in 40 countries and has a worldwide client base that has grown in recent years due in part to a dramatic increase in the activity of buyers from emerging markets, and in particular, China. The collection of auction receivables related to buyers from emerging markets may be adversely impacted by the buyer's lack of familiarity with the auction process and the buyer's financial condition. Sotheby's ability to collect auction receivables may also be adversely impacted by the banking and foreign currency laws and regulations regarding the movement of funds out of certain countries, as well as by Sotheby's ability to enforce its rights as a creditor in jurisdictions where the applicable laws and regulations may be less defined, particularly in emerging markets.
Demand for art-related financing is unpredictable, which may cause variability in Sotheby's results of operations.
Sotheby's business is, in part, dependent on the demand for art-related financing, which can be significantly influenced by overall economic conditions and by the often unpredictable financial requirements of owners of major art collections. Accordingly, the results of Sotheby's Finance segment are subject to variability from period to period.
The ability of Sotheby's to realize proceeds from the sale of collateral for Finance segment loans may be delayed or limited.
In situations when there are competing claims on the collateral for Finance segment loans and/or when a borrower becomes subject to bankruptcy or insolvency laws, Sotheby's ability to realize proceeds from the sale of its collateral may be limited or delayed.
The value of the property held in inventory and the property pledged as collateral for Finance segment loans is subjective and often fluctuates, exposing Sotheby's to losses and significant variability in its results.
The market for fine art, decorative art, and jewelry is not a highly liquid trading market. As a result, the valuation of these items is inherently subjective and their realizable value often fluctuates over time. Accordingly, Sotheby's is at risk both as to the realizable value of the property held in inventory and as to the realizable value of the property pledged as collateral for Finance segment loans. In estimating the realizable value of the property held in inventory and the property pledged as collateral for Finance segment loans, management relies on the opinions of Sotheby's specialists, who consider the following complex array of factors when valuing these items: (i) whether the property is expected to be offered at auction or sold privately, and the timing of any such sale, (ii) the supply and demand for the property, taking into account economic conditions and, when relevant, changing trends in the art market as to which collecting categories and artists are most sought after; and (iii) recent sale prices achieved for comparable items within a particular collecting category and/or by a particular artist. If there is evidence that the estimated realizable value of a specific item held in inventory is less than its carrying value, a loss is recorded to reflect management's revised estimate of realizable value. In addition, if the estimated realizable value of the property pledged as collateral for a Finance segment loan is less than the corresponding loan balance, management assesses whether it is necessary to record a loss to reduce the carrying value of the loan, after taking into account the ability of the borrower to repay any shortfall between the value of the collateral and the amount of the loan. These factors may cause significant variability in Sotheby's results from period to period.
The low rate of historic losses on the Finance segment loan portfolio may not be indicative of future loan loss experience.
Sotheby's has historically incurred minimal losses on the Finance segment loan portfolio. However, despite management's stringent loan underwriting standards, Sotheby's previous loan loss experience may not be indicative of the future performance of the loan portfolio.
The collateral supporting the Finance segment loan portfolio is concentrated within certain collecting categories. A material decline in these markets could impair Sotheby’s ability to collect the principal and interest owed on certain loans and could require repayments of borrowings on such affected loans under Sotheby's revolving credit facility.
The collateral supporting the Finance segment loan portfolio is concentrated within certain collecting categories. Although management believes the Finance segment loan portfolio is sufficiently collateralized due to its current aggregate loan-to-value ratio of 50%, a material decline in these markets could impair Sotheby’s ability to collect the principal and interest owed on certain loans. Additionally, the eligibility of individual Finance segment loans included in the borrowing base of Sotheby's revolving credit facility requires a minimum loan-to-value ratio of 60%. A material decline in the value of Finance segment loan collateral could result in an increase in the loan-to-value ratio above 60% for individual loans and could require repayment of a portion of the borrowings associated with such loans.
63#
Sotheby's could be exposed to losses and/or reputational harm as a result of various claims and lawsuits incidental to the ordinary course of its business.
Sotheby's becomes involved in various legal proceedings, lawsuits, and other claims incidental to the ordinary course of its business. Management is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes in these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable or reasonably possible losses. A determination of the amount of losses, if any, to be recorded or disclosed as a result of these contingencies is based on a careful analysis of each individual exposure with, in some cases, the assistance of outside legal counsel. The amount of losses recorded or disclosed for such contingencies may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or a change in settlement strategy.
Sotheby's could be exposed to reputational harm as a result of wrongful actions by certain third parties.
Sotheby's is involved in various business arrangements and ventures with unaffiliated third parties. Wrongful actions by such parties could harm Sotheby's brand and reputation.
Sotheby's could be exposed to losses in the event of title or authenticity claims.
The assessment of property offered for auction or private sale can involve potential claims regarding title and authenticity. Items sold by Sotheby's may be subject to statutory warranties as to title and to a limited guarantee as to authenticity under the Conditions of Sale and Terms of Guarantee that are published in Sotheby's auction sale catalogues and the terms stated in, and the laws applicable to, agreements governing private sale transactions. The authentication of the items offered by Sotheby's is based on scholarship and research, but necessarily requires a degree of judgment from Sotheby's specialists. In the event of a title or authenticity claim against Sotheby's, Sotheby's may have recourse against the seller of the property and may have the benefit of insurance, but a claim could nevertheless expose Sotheby's to losses and to reputational risk.
Auction guarantees create the risk of loss resulting from the potential inaccurate valuation of art.
As discussed above, the market for fine art, decorative art, and jewelry is not a highly liquid trading market and, as a result, the valuation of these items is inherently subjective. Accordingly, Sotheby's is at risk with respect to management's ability to estimate the likely selling prices of property offered with auction guarantees. If management's judgments about the likely selling prices of property offered with auction guarantees prove to be inaccurate, there could be a significant adverse impact on Sotheby's results, financial condition, and liquidity. (See Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to auction guarantees.)
Sotheby's could be exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by its counterparties in auction guarantee risk and reward sharing arrangements.
In certain situations, Sotheby's reduces its financial exposure under auction guarantees through risk and reward sharing arrangements. Sotheby's counterparties to these risk and reward sharing arrangements are typically major international art dealers or major art collectors. Sotheby's could be exposed to losses in the event any of these counterparties do not perform according to the terms of these contractual arrangements. (See Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to auction guarantees.)
Future costs and obligations related to Sotheby's U.K. Pension Plan are dependent on unpredictable factors, which may cause significant variability in employee benefit costs.
Future costs and obligations related to Sotheby's defined benefit pension plan in the U.K. are heavily influenced by changes in interest rates, investment performance in the debt and equity markets, changes in statutory requirements in the U.K., and actuarial assumptions, each of which is unpredictable and may cause significant variability in Sotheby's employee benefit costs. (See "Results of Operations" within Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the U.K. Pension Plan.)
64#
Tax matters may cause significant variability in Sotheby's financial results.
Sotheby's operates in many tax jurisdictions throughout the world and the provision for income taxes involves a significant amount of management judgment regarding interpretation of relevant facts and laws in the jurisdictions in which Sotheby's operates. Sotheby's effective income tax rate can vary significantly between periods due to a number of complex factors including, but not limited to: (i) future changes in applicable laws; (ii) projected levels of taxable income; (iii) changes in the jurisdictional mix of forecasted and/or actual pre-tax income; (iv) increases or decreases to valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets; (v) tax audits conducted by various tax authorities; (vi) adjustments to income taxes upon the finalization of income tax returns; (vii) the ability to claim foreign tax credits; (viii) the repatriation of foreign earnings for which Sotheby's has not previously provided income taxes; and (ix) tax planning strategies.
Sotheby's clients reside in various tax jurisdictions throughout the world. To the extent that there are changes to tax laws or tax reporting obligations in any of these jurisdictions, such changes could adversely impact the ability and/or willingness of clients to purchase or sell works of art through Sotheby's. Additionally, Sotheby's is subject to laws and regulations in many countries involving sales, use, value-added and other indirect taxes which are assessed by various governmental authorities and imposed on certain revenue-producing transactions between Sotheby's and its clients. The application of these laws and regulations to Sotheby's unique business and global client base, and the estimation of any related liabilities, is complex and requires a significant amount of judgment. These indirect tax liabilities are generally not those of Sotheby’s unless it fails to collect the correct amount of sales, use, value-added, or other indirect taxes. Failure to collect the correct amount of indirect tax on a transaction may expose Sotheby's to claims from tax authorities.
Insurance coverage for artwork may become more difficult to obtain, exposing Sotheby's to losses for artwork in Sotheby's possession.
Sotheby's maintains insurance coverage for the works of art it owns, works of art consigned by clients, and all other property that may be in Sotheby's custody, which are exhibited and stored at Sotheby's facilities around the world. An inability to adequately insure such works of art due to limited capacity of the global art insurance market could, in the future, have a material adverse impact on Sotheby's business.
Due to the nature of its business, valuable works of art are exhibited and stored at Sotheby's facilities around the world. Such works of art could be subject to damage or theft, which could have a material adverse effect on Sotheby's business and reputation.
Valuable works of art are exhibited and stored at Sotheby's facilities around the world. Although Sotheby's maintains state of the art security measures at its premises, valuable artworks may be subject to damage or theft. The damage or theft of valuable property despite Sotheby's security measures could have a material adverse impact on Sotheby's business and reputation. Sotheby's maintains insurance coverage for the works of art that are exhibited and stored at its facilities, which could significantly mitigate any potential losses resulting from the damage or theft of such works of art.
ITEM 4: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
65#
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
10.1 | Severance Agreement, dated June 1, 2015, between Sotheby's and David Goodman. |
10.2 | Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Auction Credit Agreement and Amended and Restated SFS Credit Agreement, dated June 15, 2015, by and among Sotheby’s, a Delaware corporation, Sotheby’s, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services California, Inc., Oberon, Inc., Sotheby’s Ventures, LLC, Sotheby’s Financial Services Limited, Oatshare Limited, Sotheby’s, a company registered in England, and Sotheby’s Hong Kong Limited as Borrowers, the Other Credit Parties signatory hereto, General Electric Capital Corporation, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and the Lenders signatory hereto. |
10.3 | Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Auction Revolving Credit Facility), dated June 15, 2015, among Sotheby’s, a Delaware corporation, Sotheby’s, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services California, Inc., Oberon, Inc., Sotheby’s Ventures, LLC, Sotheby’s Financial Services Limited, Oatshare Limited, Sotheby’s, a company registered in England, and Sotheby’s Hong Kong Limited as Borrowers, the Other Credit Parties signatory hereto, as Credit Parties, the Lenders Signatory Hereto from time to time, as Lenders, General Electric Capital Corporation, as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent, and a Lender, and GE Capital Markets, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners. |
10.4 | Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the SFS Revolving Credit Facility), dated June 15, 2015, among Sotheby’s, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services California, Inc., Oberon, Inc., Sotheby’s Ventures, LLC, Sotheby’s Financial Services Limited, Sotheby’s, a company registered in England, and Sotheby’s Hong Kong Limited as Borrowers, the Other Credit Parties signatory hereto, as Credit Parties, the Lenders Signatory Hereto from time to time, as Lenders, General Electric Capital Corporation, as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent, and a Lender, and GE Capital Markets, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners. |
10.5 | Second Amended and Restated Sotheby's Restricted Stock Unit Plan, reflecting amendments effective as of January 1, 2015. |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
66#
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
i. | On May 11, 2015, Sotheby's filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 2.02, “Results of Operations and Financial Condition" and Item 9.01, “Financial Statements and Exhibits.” |
ii. | On June 1, 2015, Sotheby's filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 5.02, “Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers." |
iii. | On June 15, 2015, Sotheby's filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 1.01, "Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement" and Item 2.03, "Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant." |
iv. | On June 26, 2015, Sotheby's filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 5.02, “Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers." |
67#
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SOTHEBY’S | ||
By: | /s/ KEVIN M. DELANEY | |
Kevin M. Delaney | ||
Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer | ||
Date: August 7, 2015
68#
EXHIBIT INDEX
10.1 | Severance Agreement, dated June 1, 2015, between Sotheby's and David Goodman. |
10.2 | Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Auction Credit Agreement and Amended and Restated SFS Credit Agreement, dated June 15, 2015, by and among Sotheby’s, a Delaware corporation, Sotheby’s, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services California, Inc., Oberon, Inc., Sotheby’s Ventures, LLC, Sotheby’s Financial Services Limited, Oatshare Limited, Sotheby’s, a company registered in England, and Sotheby’s Hong Kong Limited as Borrowers, the Other Credit Parties signatory hereto, General Electric Capital Corporation, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and the Lenders signatory hereto. |
10.3 | Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Auction Revolving Credit Facility), dated June 15, 2015, among Sotheby’s, a Delaware corporation, Sotheby’s, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services California, Inc., Oberon, Inc., Sotheby’s Ventures, LLC, Sotheby’s Financial Services Limited, Oatshare Limited, Sotheby’s, a company registered in England, and Sotheby’s Hong Kong Limited as Borrowers, the Other Credit Parties signatory hereto, as Credit Parties, the Lenders Signatory Hereto from time to time, as Lenders, General Electric Capital Corporation, as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent, and a Lender, and GE Capital Markets, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners. |
10.4 | Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the SFS Revolving Credit Facility), dated June 15, 2015, among Sotheby’s, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services, Inc., Sotheby’s Financial Services California, Inc., Oberon, Inc., Sotheby’s Ventures, LLC, Sotheby’s Financial Services Limited, Sotheby’s, a company registered in England, and Sotheby’s Hong Kong Limited as Borrowers, the Other Credit Parties signatory hereto, as Credit Parties, the Lenders Signatory Hereto from time to time, as Lenders, General Electric Capital Corporation, as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent, and a Lender, and GE Capital Markets, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners. |
10.5 | Second Amended and Restated Sotheby's Restricted Stock Unit Plan, reflecting amendments effective as of January 1, 2015. |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
69#