Form 6-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
Commission file number 1-33198
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
4th floor, Belvedere Building, 69 Pitts Bay Road, Hamilton, HM 08, Bermuda
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant files or will file annual reports under cover
Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this
Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON FORM 6-K FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 34
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated - Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated - Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOYAGE REVENUES (including $49,546 and $90,711 from
related parties for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, and $37,344 and $76,258
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively notes 9a, 9b and 9c) |
|
|
224,484 |
|
|
|
193,214 |
|
|
|
429,416 |
|
|
|
385,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
59,811 |
|
|
|
36,859 |
|
|
|
111,188 |
|
|
|
71,394 |
|
Vessel operating expenses (including ($749) and
($1,145) from related parties for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, respectively notes 9h
and 9l, note 10) |
|
|
45,507 |
|
|
|
36,136 |
|
|
|
87,438 |
|
|
|
67,494 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
32,262 |
|
|
|
36,473 |
|
|
|
65,908 |
|
|
|
74,588 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
36,447 |
|
|
|
30,128 |
|
|
|
69,359 |
|
|
|
58,952 |
|
General and administrative (including $13,903 and
$26,720 from related parties for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and $15,988
and $29,419 for the three and six months ended June
30, 2007, respectively notes 9d, 9e and 9f, note
10) |
|
|
15,684 |
|
|
|
16,590 |
|
|
|
31,002 |
|
|
|
32,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
189,711 |
|
|
|
156,186 |
|
|
|
364,895 |
|
|
|
304,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
34,773 |
|
|
|
37,028 |
|
|
|
64,521 |
|
|
|
81,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest gain (expense) (notes 6 and 10, including
$1,236 from related parties for both the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007 note 9n) |
|
|
23,153 |
|
|
|
10,594 |
|
|
|
(44,036 |
) |
|
|
(9,421 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
Foreign currency exchange loss (note 10) |
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
(4,578 |
) |
|
|
(3,573 |
) |
|
|
(8,550 |
) |
Income tax recovery (note 11) |
|
|
7,542 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
7,345 |
|
|
|
4,628 |
|
Other income net (note 8) |
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
2,582 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
5,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
32,950 |
|
|
|
10,069 |
|
|
|
(33,024 |
) |
|
|
(5,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before non-controlling interest |
|
|
67,723 |
|
|
|
47,097 |
|
|
|
31,497 |
|
|
|
75,566 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
(42,498 |
) |
|
|
(35,343 |
) |
|
|
(19,021 |
) |
|
|
(56,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
25,225 |
|
|
|
11,754 |
|
|
|
12,476 |
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dropdown Predecessors interest in net income (note 1) |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
General partners interest in net income |
|
|
7,145 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
6,880 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
Limited partners interest: (note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
17,232 |
|
|
|
10,341 |
|
|
|
4,263 |
|
|
|
16,677 |
|
Net income per: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Common unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
- Subordinated unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
- Total unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Common units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
11,151,648 |
|
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
|
|
10,475,824 |
|
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
- Subordinated units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
- Total units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
20,951,648 |
|
|
|
19,600,000 |
|
|
|
20,275,824 |
|
|
|
19,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions declared per unit |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 3 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (note 6) |
|
|
113,021 |
|
|
|
121,224 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
43,242 |
|
|
|
42,245 |
|
Net investment in direct financing leases current |
|
|
21,727 |
|
|
|
22,268 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
38,735 |
|
|
|
34,219 |
|
Other current assets (note 9m) |
|
|
8,752 |
|
|
|
8,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
225,477 |
|
|
|
228,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment (note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $755,563
(December 31, 2007 $692,754) |
|
|
1,751,281 |
|
|
|
1,662,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in direct financing leases |
|
|
67,068 |
|
|
|
78,199 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
13,311 |
|
|
|
14,423 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 5) |
|
|
50,323 |
|
|
|
55,355 |
|
Goodwill shuttle tanker segment |
|
|
127,113 |
|
|
|
127,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,234,573 |
|
|
|
2,166,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
17,399 |
|
|
|
12,076 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
39,197 |
|
|
|
38,464 |
|
Due to affiliate (note 9m) |
|
|
9,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 6) |
|
|
96,988 |
|
|
|
64,060 |
|
Current portion of derivative instruments (note 10) |
|
|
17,377 |
|
|
|
5,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
180,433 |
|
|
|
119,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 6) |
|
|
1,521,519 |
|
|
|
1,453,407 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
76,623 |
|
|
|
77,306 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 10) |
|
|
9,146 |
|
|
|
17,770 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
25,399 |
|
|
|
27,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,813,120 |
|
|
|
1,696,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (notes 6, 9, 10 and 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
254,662 |
|
|
|
392,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners equity |
|
|
164,830 |
|
|
|
77,108 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (note 7) |
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners equity |
|
|
166,791 |
|
|
|
77,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners equity |
|
|
2,234,573 |
|
|
|
2,166,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 4 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated - Note 14) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
12,476 |
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments (note 10) |
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
(28,594 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
69,359 |
|
|
|
58,952 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
19,021 |
|
|
|
56,578 |
|
Deferred income tax recovery |
|
|
(7,345 |
) |
|
|
(4,993 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange loss and other net |
|
|
5,783 |
|
|
|
8,979 |
|
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating activities |
|
|
16,096 |
|
|
|
(49,857 |
) |
Distribution from subsidiaries to minority owners |
|
|
(46,788 |
) |
|
|
(24,269 |
) |
Expenditures for drydocking |
|
|
(16,243 |
) |
|
|
(28,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
55,439 |
|
|
|
7,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
111,338 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(14,298 |
) |
|
|
(6,361 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(41,000 |
) |
|
|
(86,000 |
) |
Net advances (to) from affiliate |
|
|
(46,544 |
) |
|
|
13,829 |
|
Equity distribution from Teekay Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common units |
|
|
209,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses from issuance of common units |
|
|
(5,431 |
) |
|
|
(1,542 |
) |
Distribution to Teekay Corporation relating to purchase of SPT Explorer
L.L.C. and SPT Navigator L.L.C. (note 9k) |
|
|
(16,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess of purchase price over the contributed basis of a 25% interest
in Teekay Offshore Operating L.P. (note 9j) |
|
|
(93,782 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions paid |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
85,487 |
|
|
|
(15,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
(49,055 |
) |
|
|
(5,216 |
) |
Investment in direct financing lease assets |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(1,980 |
) |
Direct financing lease payments received |
|
|
11,701 |
|
|
|
10,235 |
|
Purchase of a 25% interest in Teekay Offshore Operating L.P. (note 9j) |
|
|
(111,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
(149,129 |
) |
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(8,203 |
) |
|
|
(4,642 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
121,224 |
|
|
|
113,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
113,021 |
|
|
|
109,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosure (note 15)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 5 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS EQUITY
(in thousands of U.S. dollars and units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners |
|
|
PARTNERS EQUITY |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Limited Partners |
|
|
General |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dropdown |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Predecessor) |
|
|
Units |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Units |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Balance as at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
119,844 |
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
(41,795 |
) |
|
|
(941 |
) |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
77,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
6,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,476 |
|
Unrealized net gain on
qualifying cash flow hedging
instruments (notes 7 and 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
Realized net gain on
qualifying cash flow hedging
instruments (notes 7 and 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
Proceeds from follow-on public
offering of limited
partnership interests, net of
offering costs of $5,735 (note
3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,250 |
|
|
|
199,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,449 |
|
Purchase of a 25% interest in
Teekay Offshore Operating L.P.
from Teekay Corporation (note
9j) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,258 |
) |
|
|
(3,746 |
) |
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
(93,782 |
) |
Purchase of SPT Explorer
L.L.C. and SPT Navigator
L.L.C. from Teekay Corporation
(note 9k) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,253 |
) |
|
|
(638 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,455 |
) |
Cash distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,840 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,050 |
|
|
|
277,981 |
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
(118,570 |
) |
|
|
5,419 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
166,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 6 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles (or GAAP). These financial statements
include the accounts of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P., which is a limited partnership organized
under the laws of the Republic of The Marshall Islands, its wholly owned or controlled
subsidiaries and the Dropdown Predecessor, as described below (collectively, the Partnership).
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete annual financial
statements have been omitted and, therefore, these interim financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the Partnerships restated audited consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2007, which are included on Form 20-F/A filed on April 2, 2009. In the
opinion of management of our general partner, Teekay Offshore GP L.L.C. (or the General
Partner), these interim unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, of
a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the
Partnerships consolidated financial position, results of operations, changes in partners
equity and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the
interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of those for a full fiscal year.
Significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
As required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (or SFAS) No. 141, Business
Combinations, the Partnership accounts for the acquisition of interests in vessels from Teekay
Corporation as a transfer of a business between entities under common control. The method of
accounting prescribed by SFAS No. 141 for such transfers is similar to the pooling of interests
method of accounting. Under this method, the carrying amount of net assets recognized in the
balance sheets of each combining entity is carried forward to the balance sheet of the combined
entity, and no other assets or liabilities are recognized as a result of the combination. The
excess of the proceeds paid, if any, by the Partnership over Teekay Corporations historical
cost is accounted for as an equity distribution to Teekay Corporation. In addition, transfers of
net assets between entities under common control are accounted for as if the transfer occurred
from the date that the Partnership and the acquired vessels were under the common control of
Teekay Corporation and had begun operations. As a result, the Partnerships financial statements
prior to the date the interests in these vessels were actually acquired are retroactively
adjusted to include the results of these vessels during the periods they operated under the
common control of Teekay Corporation.
In July 2007, the Partnership acquired from Teekay Corporation ownership of its 100% interest in
the 2000-built shuttle tanker Navion Bergen and its 50% interest in the 2006-built shuttle
tanker Navion Gothenburg, respectively. The acquisitions included the assumption of debt,
related interest rate swap agreements and Teekay Corporations rights and obligations under
13-year, fixed-rate bareboat charters. In October 2007, the Partnership acquired from Teekay
Corporation its interest in the FSO unit Dampier Spirit, along with its 7-year fixed-rate
time-charter. In June 2008, the Partnership acquired from Teekay Corporation its interest in two
2008-built Aframax lightering tankers, the SPT Explorer and the SPT Navigator. The acquisition
included the assumption of debt and Teekay Corporations rights and obligations under 10-year,
fixed-rate bareboat charters (with options exercisable by the charterer to extend up to an
additional five years). All of these transactions were deemed to be business acquisitions
between entities under common control. As a result, the Partnerships statement of income for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Partnerships statement of cash flows
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the Partnerships statement of changes in
partners equity for the six months ended June 30, 2008 have been retroactively adjusted to
include the results of these acquired vessels (referred to herein as the Dropdown Predecessor),
from the date that the Partnership and the acquired vessels were both under common control of
Teekay Corporation and had begun operations. These vessels began operations on April 16, 2007
(Navion Bergen), July 24, 2007 (Navion Gothenburg), March 15, 1998 (Dampier Spirit), January 7,
2008 (SPT Explorer) and March 28, 2008 (SPT Navigator). The effect of adjusting the
Partnerships financial statements to account for these common control transfers increased the
Partnerships net income by $0.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $0.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the
same periods last year.
The consolidated financial statements include the financial position, results of operations and
cash flows of the Dropdown Predecessor. In the preparation of these consolidated financial
statements, general and administrative expenses and interest expense were not identifiable as
relating solely to each specific vessel with respect to the Dropdown Predecessor. General and
administrative expenses (consisting primarily of salaries and other employee-related costs,
office rent, legal and professional fees, and travel and entertainment) were allocated based on
the Dropdown Predecessors proportionate share of Teekay Corporations total ship-operating
(calendar) days for the period presented. In addition, to the extent the Dropdown Predecessor
was capitalized with non-interest bearing loans from Teekay Corporation and its subsidiaries,
these intercompany loans were generally used to finance the acquisition of the vessels. Interest
expense includes the allocation of interest to the Dropdown Predecessor from Teekay Corporation
and its subsidiaries based upon the weighted-average outstanding balance of these intercompany
loans and the weighted-average interest rate outstanding on Teekay Corporations loan facilities
that were used to finance these intercompany loans. Management believes these allocations
reasonably present the general and administrative expenses and interest expense of the Dropdown
Predecessor.
Certain of the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have been restated. The
nature of the restatements and the effect on the consolidated financial statement line items are
discussed in Note 14 of the Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 7 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
2. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
Effective January 1, 2008, the Partnership adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. In
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157, the Partnership will defer the adoption of SFAS No. 157 for its
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those items recognized or disclosed at
fair value on an annual or more frequently recurring basis, until January 1, 2009. The adoption
of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Partnerships fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair
value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value and
expands disclosure about the use of fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy has three
levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1.
|
|
Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; |
|
|
|
Level 2.
|
|
Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and |
|
|
|
Level 3.
|
|
Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own
assumptions. |
The following table presents the Partnerships assets and liabilities that are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements (1) |
|
|
(29,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts (1) |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value of the Partnerships derivative agreements is the estimated amount that
the Partnership would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date,
taking into account current interest rates, foreign exchange rates and the current credit
worthiness of both the Partnership and the swap counterparties. The estimated amount is the
present value of future cash flows. Given the current volatility in the credit markets, it
is reasonably possible that the amount recorded as a derivative liability and as a
derivative asset could vary by a material amount in the near term. |
On June 18, 2008, the Partnership completed a follow-on public offering (or the Follow-on
Offering) of 7.0 million common units at a price of $20.00 per unit, for gross proceeds of
$140.0 million. Concurrently with the public offering, Teekay Corporation, which controls the
Partnership, acquired 3.25 million common units of the Partnership in a private placement at the
same public offering price for a total cost of $65.0 million. On July 16, 2008, the
underwriters for the public offering partially exercised their over-allotment option and
purchased an additional 375,000 common units for an additional $7.5 million in gross proceeds to
the Partnership.
As a result of these equity transactions, the Partnership raised gross proceeds of $216.8
million (including the General Partners proportionate 2% capital contribution), and Teekay
Corporations ownership of the Partnership was reduced from 59.8% to 50.0% (including its
indirect 2% general partner interest). The Partnership used the net proceeds from the equity
offerings of approximately $210.8 million to fund the acquisition of an additional 25% interest
in Teekay Offshore Operating L.P. (or OPCO) from Teekay Corporation and to repay a portion of
advances to the Partnership from OPCO.
The Partnership has three reportable segments: its shuttle tanker segment; its conventional
tanker segment; and its floating storage and offtake (or FSO) segment. The Partnerships shuttle
tanker segment consists of shuttle tankers operating primarily on fixed-rate contracts of
affreightment, time-charter contracts or bareboat charter contracts. The Partnerships
conventional tanker segment consists of conventional tankers operating on fixed-rate,
time-charter contracts or bareboat charter contracts. The Partnerships FSO segment consists of
its FSO units subject to fixed-rate, time-charter contracts or bareboat charter contracts.
Segment results are evaluated based on income from vessel operations. The accounting policies
applied to the reportable segments are the same as those used in the preparation of the
Partnerships consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Page 8 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
The following tables present results for these segments for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
FSO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
FSO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
167,266 |
|
|
|
38,769 |
|
|
|
18,449 |
|
|
|
224,484 |
|
|
|
146,482 |
|
|
|
33,759 |
|
|
|
12,973 |
|
|
|
193,214 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
45,642 |
|
|
|
13,787 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
59,811 |
|
|
|
27,074 |
|
|
|
9,689 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
36,859 |
|
Vessel operating
expenses |
|
|
31,975 |
|
|
|
6,152 |
|
|
|
7,380 |
|
|
|
45,507 |
|
|
|
24,896 |
|
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
|
|
36,136 |
|
Time-charter hire
expense |
|
|
32,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,262 |
|
|
|
36,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,473 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
23,168 |
|
|
|
5,718 |
|
|
|
7,561 |
|
|
|
36,447 |
|
|
|
20,442 |
|
|
|
5,110 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
30,128 |
|
General and
administrative
(1) |
|
|
12,602 |
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
15,684 |
|
|
|
13,769 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
16,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel
operations |
|
|
21,617 |
|
|
|
11,243 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
34,773 |
|
|
|
23,828 |
|
|
|
12,065 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
37,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
FSO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
FSO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
320,325 |
|
|
|
73,596 |
|
|
|
35,495 |
|
|
|
429,416 |
|
|
|
292,628 |
|
|
|
72,648 |
|
|
|
20,238 |
|
|
|
385,514 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
84,195 |
|
|
|
26,263 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
111,188 |
|
|
|
51,895 |
|
|
|
19,153 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
71,394 |
|
Vessel operating
expenses |
|
|
61,635 |
|
|
|
12,111 |
|
|
|
13,692 |
|
|
|
87,438 |
|
|
|
47,650 |
|
|
|
11,062 |
|
|
|
8,782 |
|
|
|
67,494 |
|
Time-charter hire
expense |
|
|
65,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,908 |
|
|
|
74,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,588 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
45,719 |
|
|
|
10,976 |
|
|
|
12,664 |
|
|
|
69,359 |
|
|
|
41,137 |
|
|
|
10,695 |
|
|
|
7,120 |
|
|
|
58,952 |
|
General and
administrative
(1) |
|
|
24,887 |
|
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
2,042 |
|
|
|
31,002 |
|
|
|
26,477 |
|
|
|
3,858 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
32,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel
operations |
|
|
37,981 |
|
|
|
20,173 |
|
|
|
6,367 |
|
|
|
64,521 |
|
|
|
50,881 |
|
|
|
27,880 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
81,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and
administrative expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). |
A reconciliation of total segment assets to total assets presented in the consolidated
balance sheets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle tanker segment |
|
|
1,560,808 |
|
|
|
1,559,261 |
|
Conventional tanker segment |
|
|
337,463 |
|
|
|
255,460 |
|
FSO segment |
|
|
119,241 |
|
|
|
131,080 |
|
Unallocated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
113,021 |
|
|
|
121,224 |
|
Accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
104,040 |
|
|
|
99,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
|
2,234,573 |
|
|
|
2,166,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 9 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, intangible assets consisted of contracts of
affreightment with a weighted-average amortization period of 10.2 years.
The carrying amount of intangible assets as at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
124,250 |
|
|
|
124,250 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(73,927 |
) |
|
|
(68,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
50,323 |
|
|
|
55,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008 was $2.5 million ($2.5 million 2007) and $5.0 million ($5.5 million 2007),
respectively. Amortization of intangible assets for the five years subsequent to June 30, 2008
is expected to be $5.0 million (remainder of 2008), $9.1 million (2009), $8.1 million (2010),
$7.0 million (2011) and $6.0 million (2012).
6. Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Revolving Credit Facilities due through 2018 |
|
|
1,318,230 |
|
|
|
1,205,808 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2017 |
|
|
300,277 |
|
|
|
311,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,618,507 |
|
|
|
1,517,467 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
96,988 |
|
|
|
64,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,521,519 |
|
|
|
1,453,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2008, the Partnership had five long-term revolving credit facilities, which, as
at such date, provided for borrowings of up to $1.46 billion, of which $145.8 million was
undrawn. The total amount available under the revolving credit facilities reduces by $57.0
million (remainder of 2008), $118.9 million (2009), $125.6 million (2010), $132.8 million
(2011), $140.4 million (2012) and $889.3 million (thereafter). Three of the revolving credit
facilities are guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Partnership for all outstanding amounts
and contain covenants that require OPCO to maintain the greater of a minimum liquidity (cash,
cash equivalents and undrawn committed revolving credit lines with at least six months to
maturity) of at least $75.0 million and 5.0% of OPCOs total consolidated debt. The remaining
revolving credit facilities are guaranteed by Teekay Corporation and contain covenants that
require Teekay Corporation to maintain the greater of a minimum liquidity of $50.0 million and
5.0% of Teekay Corporations total consolidated debt, which has recourse to Teekay Corporation.
The revolving credit facilities are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on 31 of
the Partnerships vessels, together with other related security.
As at June 30, 2008, each of the Partnerships six 50% owned subsidiaries had an outstanding
term loan, which in aggregate totaled $300.3 million. The term loans have varying maturities
through 2017 and semi-annual payments that reduce over time. All term loans are collateralized
by first-priority mortgages on the vessels to which the loans relate, together with other
related security. As at June 30, 2008, the Partnership had guaranteed $99.0 million of these
term loans, which represents its 50% share of the outstanding vessel mortgage debt of five of
these 50% owned subsidiaries. The other owner and Teekay Corporation have guaranteed the
remaining $201.3 million.
Interest payments on the revolving credit facilities and term loans are based on LIBOR plus a
margin. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the margins ranged between 0.45% and 0.80%. The
weighted-average effective interest rate on the Partnerships long-term debt as at June 30, 2008
was 3.5% (December 31, 2007 5.7%). This rate does not reflect the effect of the interest rate
swaps (Note 10).
The aggregate annual long-term debt principal repayments required to be made subsequent to June
30, 2008 are $53.1 million (remainder of 2008), $126.9 million (2009), $132.3 million (2010),
$169.3 million (2011), $147.1 million (2012) and $989.8 million (thereafter).
Page 10 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
Net income |
|
|
25,225 |
|
|
|
11,754 |
|
|
|
12,476 |
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net gain on qualifying
cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
|
|
Realized net gain on qualifying
cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
25,283 |
|
|
|
11,754 |
|
|
|
13,178 |
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Partnerships accumulated other comprehensive
income of $2.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively, consisted of net unrealized gains on
derivative instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Volatile organic
compound emissions
plant lease income |
|
|
2,395 |
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
4,965 |
|
|
|
5,488 |
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income net |
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
2,582 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
5,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
|
Related Party Transactions |
|
a. |
|
Nine of OPCOs conventional tankers are employed on long-term time-charter contracts
with a subsidiary of Teekay Corporation. Under the terms of eight of these nine
time-charter contracts, OPCO is responsible for the bunker fuel expenses; however, OPCO
adds the approximate amounts of these expenses to the daily hire rate plus a 4.5% margin.
Pursuant to these charter contracts, OPCO earned voyage revenues of $36.0 million and $69.7
million, respectively, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to
$30.8 million and $63.7 million, respectively, for the same periods last year. |
|
|
b. |
|
Two of OPCOs shuttle tankers are employed on long-term bareboat charters with a
subsidiary of Teekay Corporation. Pursuant to these charter contracts, OPCO earned voyage
revenues of $3.3 million and $6.8 million, respectively, during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, compared to $3.5 million and $7.0 million, respectively, for the same
periods last year. |
|
|
c. |
|
Two of OPCOs FSO units are employed on long-term bareboat charters with a subsidiary
of Teekay Corporation. Pursuant to these charter contracts, OPCO earned voyage revenues of
$2.8 million and $5.6 million, respectively, during the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to $3.1 million and $5.6 million, respectively, for the same periods last
year. |
|
|
d. |
|
A subsidiary of Teekay Corporation has entered into a services agreement with a
subsidiary of OPCO, pursuant to which the subsidiary of OPCO provides the Teekay
Corporation subsidiary with ship management services. Pursuant to this agreement, OPCO
earned management fees of $0.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $0.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively,
for the same periods last year. |
|
|
e. |
|
The Partnership, OPCO and certain of the Partnerships and OPCOs operating
subsidiaries have entered into services agreements with certain subsidiaries of Teekay
Corporation, pursuant to which Teekay Corporation subsidiaries provide the Partnership,
OPCO and their respective operating subsidiaries with administrative, advisory, technical
and ship management services. Pursuant to these services agreements, the Partnership
incurred $14.5 million and $28.0 million, respectively, of these costs during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $16.2 million and $29.8 million, respectively,
for the same periods last year. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, $0.1
million and $0.3 million, respectively, of general and administrative expenses attributable
to the operations of vessels the Partnership acquired from Teekay Corporation were incurred
by Teekay Corporation, but also allocated to the Partnership as part of the results of the
Dropdown Predecessor. See note 1. |
|
|
f. |
|
Pursuant to the Partnerships partnership agreement, the Partnership reimburses the
General Partner for all expenses incurred by the General Partner or its affiliates that are
necessary or appropriate for the conduct of the Partnerships business. Pursuant to this
agreement, the Partnership reimbursed $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of these
costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $0.3 million and
$0.5 million, respectively, for the same periods last year. |
Page 11 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
g. |
|
The Partnership has entered into an omnibus agreement with Teekay Corporation, Teekay
LNG Partners L.P., the General Partner and others governing, among other things, when the
Partnership, Teekay Corporation and Teekay LNG Partners L.P. may compete with each other
and certain rights of first offer on certain liquefied natural gas carriers, oil tankers,
shuttle tankers, FSO units and floating production, storage and offloading units. |
|
|
h. |
|
In March 2008, Teekay Corporation agreed to reimburse the Partnership for $0.4 million
of repair costs relating to one of the Partnerships shuttle tankers. The vessel was
purchased from Teekay Corporation in July 2007 and had, as of the date of acquisition, an
inherent minor defect that required repairs. |
|
|
i. |
|
In March 2008, a subsidiary of OPCO sold certain vessel equipment to a subsidiary of
Teekay Corporation for proceeds equal to its net book value of $1.4 million. |
|
|
j. |
|
Concurrently with the closing of the Partnerships Follow-on Offering, the Partnership
acquired from Teekay Corporation an additional 25% interest in OPCO for $205.0 million,
thereby increasing the Partnerships ownership interest in OPCO to 51%. The Partnership
financed the acquisition with the net proceeds from the Follow-on Offering and a concurrent
private placement of common units to Teekay Corporation. See Note 3. The excess of the
proceeds paid by the Partnership over Teekay Corporations historical book value for the
25% interest in OPCO was accounted for as an equity distribution to Teekay Corporation of
$93.8 million. |
|
|
k. |
|
On June 18, 2008, OPCO acquired from Teekay Corporation two ship owning subsidiaries
(SPT Explorer L.L.C. and the SPT Navigator L.L.C.) for a total cost of approximately $106.0
million, including the assumption of third-party debt of approximately $90.0 million and
the non-cash settlement of related party working capital of $1.2 million. The acquired
subsidiaries own two 2008-built Aframax lightering tankers (the SPT Explorer and the SPT
Navigator) and their related 10-year, fixed-rate bareboat charters (with options
exercisable by the charterer to extend up to an additional five years) entered into with
Skaugen PetroTrans Inc., a company in which Teekay Corporation owns a 50% beneficial
interest. These two lightering tankers are specially designed to be used in ship-to-ship
oil transfer operations. This purchase was financed with the assumption of debt, together
with cash balances. The excess of the proceeds paid by the Partnership over Teekay
Corporations historical book value was accounted for as an equity distribution to Teekay
Corporation of $16.2 million. Pursuant to the bareboat charters for the vessels, OPCO
earned voyage revenues of $2.5 million and $3.7 million, respectively, for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 (including voyage revenues earned prior to OPCOs
acquisition of the vessels see Note 1). |
|
|
l. |
|
In June 2008, Teekay Corporation agreed to reimburse OPCO for certain costs relating to
events which occurred prior to the Partnerships initial public offering in December 2006,
totalling $0.7 million, primarily relating to the settlement of repair costs not covered by
insurance providers for work performed in early 2006 on two of OPCOs shuttle tankers. |
|
|
m. |
|
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, due to and from affiliate totaled $9.5 million
and $0.8 million, respectively. Due to and from affiliate are non-interest bearing and
unsecured. The balances as at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are included in due to
affiliate and other current assets, respectively. |
|
|
n. |
|
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, $1.2 million of interest expense
attributable to the operations of the Navion Bergen was incurred by Teekay Corporation and
has been allocated to the Partnership as part of the results of the Dropdown Predecessor. |
|
|
o. |
|
Two of OPCOs shuttle tankers were employed on single-voyage charters with a subsidiary
of Teekay Corporation. Pursuant to these charter contracts, OPCO earned voyage revenues of
$5.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. |
10. |
|
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
The Partnership uses derivatives in accordance with its overall risk management policies. The
following summarizes the Partnerships risk strategies with respect to market risk from foreign
currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates.
The Partnership hedges portions of its forecasted expenditures denominated in foreign currencies
with foreign exchange forward contracts. These foreign exchange forward contracts are generally
designated, for accounting purposes, as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency
expenditures. Where such instruments are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the
effective portion of the changes in their fair value is recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. At such time, the
respective amount in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is released to earnings and
is recorded within operating expenses, based on the nature of the related expense. The
ineffective portion of these foreign exchange forward contracts has also been reported in
operating expenses, based on the nature of the
Page 12 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
expense being economically hedged. During the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Partnership recognized the following
unrealized gains (losses) in vessel operating expenses, general and administrative and foreign
currency exchange loss relating to the ineffective portion of its foreign currency forward
contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts that are not designated for
accounting purposes as cash flow hedges are recognized in earnings and are reported in operating
expenses, based on the nature of the expense being hedged. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Partnership recognized the following unrealized gains (losses) in
vessel operating expenses, general and administrative and foreign currency exchange loss
relating to foreign exchange forward contracts that are not designated as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange loss |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2008, the Partnership was committed to the following foreign exchange contracts
for the forward purchase of foreign currency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount in |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Expected Maturity |
|
|
|
Foreign Currency |
|
|
Forward Rate(1) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) |
|
Norwegian Kroner |
|
|
345.7 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
Australian Dollar |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British Pound |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
Euro |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Foreign currency per U.S. Dollar. |
The Partnership enters into interest rate swaps, which exchange a receipt of floating interest
for a payment of fixed interest to reduce the Partnerships exposure to interest rate
variability on its outstanding floating-rate debt. The Partnership has not designated, for
accounting purposes, its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of its USD LIBOR denominated
borrowings. Unrealized gains or losses relating to the change in fair value of the Partnerships
interest rate swaps have been reported in interest expense in the consolidated statements of
income. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Partnership recognized
unrealized gains (losses) of $41.9 million and ($3.5) million, respectively, compared to
unrealized gains of $30.1 million and $28.6 million, respectively, for the same periods in the
previous year, relating to the changes in fair value of its interest rate swaps.
As at June 30, 2008, the Partnership was committed to the following interest rate swap
agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Remaining Term |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Index |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
(%)(1) |
|
U.S.
Dollar-denominated
interest rate swaps |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
935,000 |
|
|
|
(15,418 |
) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
U.S.
Dollar-denominated
interest rate
swaps(2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
405,886 |
|
|
|
(14,221 |
) |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the margin the Partnership pays on its variable-rate debt, which as at June 30,
2008, ranged from 0.50% and 0.80%.
|
|
(2) |
|
Principal amount reduces quarterly or semiannually. |
Page 13 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
The Partnership is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counter-parties
to the foreign exchange forward contracts and the interest rate swap agreements. In order to
minimize counterparty risk, the Partnership only enters into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A or better by Standard & Poors or Aa3 or better by Moodys at
the time of the transactions. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate
swaps are entered into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
The components of the provision for income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
7,542 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
7,345 |
|
|
|
4,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax recovery |
|
|
7,542 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
7,345 |
|
|
|
4,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
|
Partners Capital and Net Income Per Unit |
Partners Capital
At June 30, 2008, of our total units outstanding, 49.41% were held by the public and the
remaining units were held by a subsidiary of Teekay Corporation.
Limited Partners Rights
Significant rights of the limited partners include the following:
|
|
|
Right to receive distribution of available cash within approximately 45 days after the
end of each quarter. |
|
|
|
|
No limited partner shall have any management power over the Partnerships business and
affairs; the general partner shall conduct, direct and manage our activities. |
|
|
|
|
The General Partner may be removed if such removal is approved by unitholders holding at
least 66 2/3% of the outstanding units voting as a single class, including units held by
the General Partner and its affiliates. |
Subordinated Units
All of the Partnerships subordinated units are held by a subsidiary of Teekay Corporation.
Under the partnership agreement, during the subordination period applicable to the Partnerships
subordinated units, the common units will have the right to receive distributions of available
cash from operating surplus in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.35
per quarter, plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the
common units from prior quarters, before any distributions of available cash from operating
surplus may be made on the subordinated units. Distribution arrearages do not accrue on the
subordinated units. The purpose of the subordinated units is to increase the likelihood that
during the subordination period there will be available cash to be distributed on the common
units.
For the purpose of the net income per unit calculation (as defined below), during the quarters
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, net income exceeded the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.35
per unit and, consequently, the assumed distribution of net income resulted in an equal
distribution of net income between the subordinated unit holders and common unit holders.
Incentive Distribution Rights
The General Partner is entitled to incentive distributions if the amount the Partnership
distributes to unitholders with respect to any quarter exceeds specified target levels shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Distribution Target Amount (per unit) |
|
Unitholders |
|
|
General Partner |
|
Minimum quarterly distribution of $0.35 |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Up to $0.4025 |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Above $0.4025 up to $0.4375 |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Above $0.4375 up to $0.525 |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
Above $0.525 |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
For the purpose of the net income per unit calculation, during the quarters ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, net income exceeded $0.4025 per unit and, consequently, the assumed distribution of
net income resulted in the use of the increasing percentages to calculate the General Partners
interest in net income.
Page 14 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
Net Income Per Unit
Net income per unit is determined by dividing net income, after deducting the amount of net
income attributable to the Dropdown Predecessor and the amount of net income allocated to the
General Partners interest, by the weighted-average number of units outstanding during the
applicable period.
As required by Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and Two-Class
Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share, the General Partners, common unit
holders and subordinated unitholders interests in net income are calculated as if all net
income was distributed according to the terms of the Partnerships partnership agreement,
regardless of whether those earnings would or could be distributed. The partnership agreement
does not provide for the distribution of net income; rather, it provides for the distribution of
available cash, which is a contractually defined term that generally means all cash on hand at
the end of each quarter after establishment of cash reserves. Unlike available cash, net income
is affected by non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization, unrealized gains and losses
on derivative instruments and foreign currency translation gains (losses).
Pursuant to the partnership agreement, income allocations are made on a quarterly basis;
therefore, earnings per limited partner unit for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is
calculated as the sum of the quarterly earnings per limited partner unit for each of the first
two quarters of the year.
13. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
The Partnership may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings and claims that arise
in the ordinary course of business. The Partnership believes that any adverse outcome,
individually or in the aggregate, of any existing claims would not have a material affect on its
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, when taking into
account its insurance coverage and indemnifications from charterers or Teekay Corporation.
14. |
|
Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements |
|
(a) |
|
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
In August 2008, the Partnership commenced a review of its application of SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. Based on its review
the Partnership concluded that certain of its interest rate swap agreements and foreign currency
forward contracts did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007. The Partnerships findings were as follows:
|
|
|
One of the requirements of SFAS No. 133 is that hedge accounting is appropriate only for
those hedging relationships that a company expects will be highly effective in achieving
offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged. To
determine whether transactions satisfy this requirement, entities must periodically assess
the effectiveness of hedging relationships both prospectively and retrospectively. Based
on the Partnerships review, the Partnership concluded that the prospective hedge
effectiveness assessment that was conducted for certain of the Partnership interest rate
swap agreements on the date of designation was not sufficient to conclude that the interest
rate swaps would be highly effective in accordance with the strict technical requirements
of SFAS No. 133, in achieving offsetting changes in cash flows attributable to the risk
being hedged. |
|
|
|
|
To conclude that hedge accounting is appropriate, another requirement of SFAS No. 133 is
that the applicable hedge documentation specifies the method that will be used to assess,
retrospectively and prospectively, the hedging instruments effectiveness, and the method
that will be used to measure hedge ineffectiveness. Certain of the Partnerships interest
rate swap agreements did not clearly specify the method to be used to measure hedge
ineffectiveness. |
|
|
|
|
Certain of the Partnerships derivative instruments were designated as hedges when the
derivative instruments had a non-zero fair value. However, this designation was not
appropriate as the Partnership used certain methods of measuring ineffectiveness that are
prohibited in the case of non-zero fair value derivatives. |
For accounting purposes the Partnership should have reflected changes in fair value of these
derivative instruments as increases or decreases to the Partnerships net income (loss) on its
consolidated statements of income (loss), instead of being reflected as increases or decreases
to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of partners equity on the
consolidated balance sheets and statements of changes in partners equity.
The change in accounting for these transactions does not affect the Partnerships cash flows,
liquidity or cash distributions to partners.
Page 15 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
(b) |
|
Vessels Acquired from Teekay Corporation |
In connection with the Partnership assessing the potential impact of SFAS No. 141(R), which
replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, the Partnership re-assessed its accounting treatment of interests in vessels
it purchased from Teekay Corporation subsequent to the Partnerships initial public offering in
December 2006. The Partnership has historically treated the acquisition of interests in these
vessels as asset acquisitions, not business acquisitions. If the acquisitions were deemed to be
business acquisitions, the acquisitions would have been accounted for in a manner similar to the
pooling of interest method whereby the Partnerships consolidated financial statements prior to
the date the interests in these vessels were acquired by it would be retroactively adjusted to
include the results of these acquired vessels, or the Dropdown Predecessor from the date that
the Partnership and the acquired vessels were both under common control of Teekay Corporation
and had begun operations. The Partnership now has determined that the acquisitions should have
been accounted for as business acquisitions under GAAP.
The impact of the retroactive Dropdown Predecessor adjustments does not affect the limited
partners interest in net income, earnings per unit, or cash distributions to partners. However,
the impact of the retroactive Dropdown Predecessor adjustments has resulted in an increase in
previously reported net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
In July 2007, the Partnership acquired from Teekay Corporation ownership of its 100% interest in
the 2000-built shuttle tanker Navion Bergen and its 50% interest in the 2006-built shuttle
tanker Navion Gothenburg, respectively. The acquisitions included the assumption of debt,
related interest rate swap agreements and Teekay Corporations rights and obligations under
13-year, fixed-rate bareboat charters. In October 2007, the Partnership acquired from Teekay
Corporation its interest in the FSO unit Dampier Spirit, along with its 7-year fixed-rate
time-charter. These transactions were deemed to be business acquisitions between entities under
common control. As a result, the Partnerships statements of income for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007 and its statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007
reflect these vessels as if the Partnership had acquired them when each respective vessel began
operations under the ownership of Teekay Corporation. These vessels began operations on April
16, 2007 (Navion Bergen), July 24, 2007 (Navion Gothenburg) and March 15, 1998 (Dampier Spirit).
As a result of the conclusions described above in this Note 14, the Partnership is restating
herein its statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and its
statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the Partnerships previously reported and its
restated net income for the periods shown (in thousands of U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Partners Equity |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
10,546 |
|
|
|
138,942 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, net of non-controlling interest |
|
|
7,531 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dropdown Predecessor (1) |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
51,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As restated |
|
|
11,754 |
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
|
|
190,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to the results for the pre-acquisition periods in which the Partnership and the
acquired interest in vessels, as listed below, were both in operation and under the common
control of Teekay Corporation, as follows: |
|
|
|
Dampier Spirit (FSO unit) for March 15, 1998 to June 30, 2007; |
|
|
|
|
Navion Bergen (shuttle tanker) for April 16, 2007 to June 30, 2007; and |
|
|
|
|
Navion Gothenburg (shuttle tanker) began operations concurrently with the
Partnerships acquisition of it on July 24, 2007. |
Page 16 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement on the Partnerships unaudited
consolidated statement of income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands of U.S.
dollars, except unit and per unit amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Dropdown |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
VOYAGE REVENUES |
|
|
189,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
193,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
36,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
36,859 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
33,559 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2,566 |
|
|
|
36,136 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
36,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,473 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
30,128 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
16,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
16,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
152,118 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4,057 |
|
|
|
156,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
37,071 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
37,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest gain (expense) |
|
|
(17,553 |
) |
|
|
29,485 |
|
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
10,594 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
Foreign currency exchange (loss) gain |
|
|
(5,797 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
(4,578 |
) |
Income tax (expense) recovery |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Other income net |
|
|
2,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
(19,953 |
) |
|
|
29,481 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
10,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before non-controlling interest |
|
|
17,118 |
|
|
|
29,470 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
47,097 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
(13,404 |
) |
|
|
(21,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
7,531 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
11,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dropdown predecessors interest in net
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509 |
|
General partners interest in net income |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
904 |
|
Limited partners interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,341 |
|
Net income per: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Common unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
- Subordinated unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
- Total unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of units
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Common units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
- Subordinated units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
- Total units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
19,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions declared per unit |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 17 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement on the Partnerships unaudited
consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands of U.S.
dollars, except unit and per unit amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Dropdown |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
VOYAGE REVENUES |
|
|
379,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,573 |
|
|
|
385,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
71,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
71,394 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
63,778 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
67,494 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
74,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,588 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
57,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
58,952 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
31,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
32,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
298,752 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
304,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
81,189 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
81,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest gain (expense) |
|
|
(36,062 |
) |
|
|
27,985 |
|
|
|
(1,344 |
) |
|
|
(9,421 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
Foreign currency exchange (loss) gain |
|
|
(9,957 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
(8,550 |
) |
Income tax recovery |
|
|
3,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
4,628 |
|
Other income net |
|
|
5,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
(34,860 |
) |
|
|
27,981 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
(5,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before non-controlling interest |
|
|
46,329 |
|
|
|
27,959 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
75,566 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
(35,783 |
) |
|
|
(20,795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
10,546 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dropdown predecessors interest in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
General partners interest in net income |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
Limited partners interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
10,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,677 |
|
Net income per: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Common unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
- Subordinated unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
- Total unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Common units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
- Subordinated units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
- Total units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
19,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions declared per unit |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 18 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement on the Partnerships unaudited
statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands of U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Dropdown |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
10,546 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,594 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
57,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
58,952 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
35,783 |
|
|
|
20,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,578 |
|
Deferred income tax recovery |
|
|
(3,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,619 |
) |
|
|
(4,993 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange loss (gain) and other
net |
|
|
10,465 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
(2,121 |
) |
|
|
8,979 |
|
Change in non-cash working capital items related
to operating activities |
|
|
(52,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
(49,857 |
) |
Distribution from subsidiaries to minority owners |
|
|
(24,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,269 |
) |
Expenditures for drydocking |
|
|
(18,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,427 |
) |
|
|
(28,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
15,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,150 |
) |
|
|
7,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(6,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,361 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(86,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86,000 |
) |
Net advances from affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,829 |
|
|
|
13,829 |
|
Equity distribution from Teekay Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
Expenses from issuance of common units |
|
|
(1,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,542 |
) |
Cash distributions paid |
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
(31,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,776 |
|
|
|
(15,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
(5,216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,216 |
) |
Investment in direct financing lease assets |
|
|
(1,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,980 |
) |
Direct financing lease payments received |
|
|
10,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(13,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,626 |
|
|
|
(4,642 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the
period |
|
|
113,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
100,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,626 |
|
|
|
109,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 19 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
15. |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
The Partnerships consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 reflect the Dropdown Predecessor as if the Partnership had acquired the Dropdown
Predecessor when each respective vessel began operations under the ownership of Teekay
Corporation. If Teekay Corporation financed the construction or purchase of the vessel prior to
the Dropdown Predecessor being included in the results of the Partnership, the expenditures for
the vessel by Teekay Corporation have been treated as a non-cash transaction in the
Partnerships consolidated statement of cash flows. The non-cash investing activities related
to the Dropdown Predecessor are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
89,419 |
|
|
|
71,646 |
|
16. |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncement |
In October 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (or FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (or SFAS) No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial
Asset in a Market That Is Not Active, which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 when the
market for a financial asset is inactive. Specifically, SFAS No. 157-3 clarifies how (1)
managements internal assumptions should be considered in measuring fair value when observable
data are not present, (2) observable market information from an inactive market should be taken
into account, and (3) the use of broker quotes or pricing services should be considered in
assessing the relevance of observable and unobservable data to measure fair value. The guidance
in SFAS No. 157-3 is effective immediately but does not have any impact on the Partnerships
consolidated financial statements.
Page 20 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2008
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements
The discussion and analysis below reflects the impact of our restatement. Please read Note 14 of
the notes to the consolidated financial statements for a more detailed discussion of our restated
results and the basis for them. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of previously
reported and restated net income (loss) for the periods shown (in thousands of US dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net income, as previously reported |
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
10,546 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, net of non-controlling interest |
|
|
7,531 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
Dropdown Predecessor (1) |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as restated |
|
|
11,754 |
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to the results for the pre-acquisition periods in which we and vessels we
acquired from Teekay Corporation, as listed below, were both in operation and under the
common control of Teekay Corporation, as follows: |
|
|
|
Dampier Spirit (FSO unit) for March 15, 1998 to June 30, 2007; |
|
|
|
|
Navion Bergen (shuttle tanker) for April 16, 2007 to June 30, 2007; and |
|
|
|
|
Navion Gothenburg (shuttle tanker) began operations concurrently with our
acquisition of this vessel on July 24, 2007. |
OVERVIEW
We are an international provider of marine transportation and storage services to the offshore oil
industry. We were formed in August 2006 by Teekay Corporation, a leading provider of marine
services to the global oil and natural gas industries, to further develop its operations in the
offshore market. Our principal asset is a 51% controlling interest in Teekay Offshore Operating
L.P. (or OPCO), which operates a substantial majority of our shuttle tankers and floating storage
and offtake (or FSO) units and all of our conventional crude oil tankers. Our growth strategy
focuses on expanding our fleet of shuttle tankers and FSO units under long-term, fixed-rate time
charters. We intend to continue our practice of acquiring shuttle tankers and FSO units as needed
for approved projects only after the long-term charters for the projects have been awarded to us,
rather than ordering vessels on a speculative basis. We intend to follow this same practice in
acquiring floating production, storage and offloading (or FPSO) units, which produce and process
oil offshore in addition to providing storage and offloading capabilities. We seek to capitalize on
opportunities emerging from the global expansion of the offshore transportation, storage and
production sectors by selectively targeting long-term, fixed-rate time charters. We may enter into
joint ventures and partnerships with companies that may provide increased access to these
opportunities or may engage in vessel or business acquisitions. We seek to leverage the expertise,
relationships and reputation of Teekay Corporation and its affiliates to pursue these growth
opportunities in the offshore sectors and may consider other opportunities to which our competitive
strengths are well suited. We view our conventional tanker fleet primarily as a source of stable
cash flow as we seek to expand our offshore operations.
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS
Equity Offerings; Acquisition of Additional 25% Interest in OPCO
On June 18, 2008, we completed a follow-on public offering of 7.0 million common units at a price
of $20.00 per unit, for gross proceeds of $140.0 million. Concurrently with the public offering,
Teekay Corporation acquired 3.25 million of our common units in a private placement at the same
public offering price for a total cost of $65.0 million. On July 16, 2008, the underwriters for
the public offering partially exercised their over-allotment option and purchased an additional
375,000 common units for an additional $7.5 million in gross proceeds to us.
As a result of these equity transactions, we raised gross proceeds of $216.8 million (including our
general partners proportionate 2% capital contribution), and Teekay Corporations ownership of us
was reduced from 59.8% to 50.0% (including its indirect 2% general partner interest). We used the
net proceeds from the equity offerings of approximately $210.8 million to fund the acquisition for
$205.0 million of an additional 25% interest in OPCO from Teekay Corporation and to repay a portion
of advances from OPCO to us.
Acquisition of Vessels in 2008
In June 2008, OPCO acquired from Teekay Corporation two 2008-built Aframax lightering tankers, the
SPT Explorer and the SPT Navigator, for a total cost of approximately $106.0 million, including
assumption of debt of $90.0 million. These two lightering tankers are specially designed to be used
in ship-to-ship oil transfer operations. They operate under 10-year, fixed-rate bareboat charters
to Skaugen PetroTrans Inc., a company in which Teekay Corporation owns a 50% beneficial interest,
with options exercisable by the charterer to extend up to an additional five years.
The Partnership accounts for the acquisition of vessels as business combinations between entities
under common control.
Page 21 of 34
In June 2007, OPCO exercised its option to purchase a 2001-built shuttle tanker from a third party,
the Navion Oslo, for $41.7 million, which vessel previously had been in-chartered by OPCO and
included in our shuttle tanker fleet. The vessel was delivered to OPCO in March 2008.
Potential Additional Shuttle Tanker, FSO and FPSO Projects
Pursuant to an omnibus agreement we entered into in connection with our initial public offering,
Teekay Corporation is obligated to offer us certain shuttle tankers, FSO units, and FPSO units it
may acquire in the future, provided the vessels are servicing contracts in excess of three years in
length.
Teekay Corporation has ordered four Aframax shuttle tanker newbuildings, which are scheduled to
deliver in 2010 and 2011, for a total delivered cost of approximately $463.3 million. It is
anticipated that these vessels will be offered to us and will be used to service either new
long-term, fixed-rate contracts Teekay Corporation may be awarded prior to the vessel deliveries or
OPCOs contracts-of-affreightment in the North Sea.
The omnibus agreement also obligates Teekay Corporation to offer to us (a) its interest in certain
future FPSO and FSO projects it may undertake in the future through its 50%-owned joint venture
with Teekay Petrojarl ASA and (b) by July 9, 2009 as a result of Teekay Corporations obtaining
100% ownership of Teekay Petrojarl ASA on July 9, 2008, the opportunity to purchase for fair market
value the existing FPSO units owned by Teekay Petrojarl ASA that are servicing contracts in excess
of three years in length.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We use a variety of financial and operational terms and concepts when analyzing our results of
operations, which can be found in Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects in our
Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2007. In accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles (or GAAP), we report gross revenues in our income
statements and include voyage expenses among our operating expenses. However, shipowners base
economic decisions regarding the deployment of their vessels upon anticipated time charter
equivalent (or TCE) rates, and industry analysts typically measure bulk shipping freight rates in
terms of TCE rates. This is because under time charters and bareboat charters the customer usually
pays the voyage expenses, while under voyage charters and contracts of affreightment the shipowner
usually pays the voyage expenses, which typically are added to the hire rate at an approximate
cost. Accordingly, the discussion of revenue below focuses on net voyage revenues (i.e. voyage
revenues less voyage expenses) and TCE rates of our three reportable segments where applicable. TCE
rates represent net voyage revenues divided by revenue days. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 4 Segment Reporting.
Items You Should Consider When Evaluating Our Results of Operations
You should consider the following factors when evaluating our historical financial performance and
assessing our future prospects:
|
|
|
Our financial results reflect the results of the interests in vessels acquired from
Teekay Corporation for all periods the vessels were under common control. In July 2007, we
acquired from Teekay Corporation ownership of its 100% interest in the 2000-built shuttle
tanker Navion Bergen and its 50% interest in the 2006-built shuttle tanker Navion
Gothenburg, respectively. The acquisitions included the assumption of debt, related
interest rate swap agreements and Teekay Corporations rights and obligations under
13-year, fixed-rate bareboat charters. In October 2007, we acquired from Teekay Corporation
its interest in the FSO unit Dampier Spirit, along with its 7-year fixed-rate time-charter.
In June 2008, we acquired from Teekay Corporation its interests in two 2008-built Aframax
lightering tankers, the SPT Explorer and the SPT Navigator. The acquisition included the
assumption of debt and Teekay Corporations rights and obligations under 10-year,
fixed-rate bareboat charters (with options exercisable by the charterer to extend up to an
additional five years). |
These transactions were deemed to be business acquisitions between entities under common
control. Accordingly, we have accounted for these transactions in a manner similar to the
pooling of interest method. Under this method of accounting, our financial statements prior
to the date the interests in these vessels were actually acquired by us are retroactively
adjusted to include the results of these acquired vessels. The periods retroactively
adjusted include all periods that we and the acquired vessels were both under common control
of Teekay Corporation and had begun operations. As a result, our statements of income (loss)
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 reflect these vessels, referred to
herein as the Dropdown Predecessor, as if we had acquired them when each respective vessel
began operations under the ownership of Teekay Corporation. These vessels began operations
on April 16, 2007 (Navion Bergen), July 24, 2007 (Navion Gothenburg), March 15, 1998
(Dampier Spirit), January 7, 2008 (SPT Explorer) and March 28, 2008 (SPT Navigator).
|
|
|
The size of our fleet continues to change. Our results of operations reflect changes in
the size and composition of our fleet due to certain vessel deliveries and vessel
dispositions. For instance, the average number of owned vessels in our shuttle tanker fleet
increased from 24 in 2007 to 27 in 2008, our conventional tanker segment increased from 10
in 2007 to 11 in 2008 and our FSO segment increased from 4 in 2007 to 5 in 2008. Please
read Results of Operations below for further details about vessel dispositions and
deliveries. Due to the nature of our business, we expect our fleet to continue to fluctuate
in size and composition. |
|
|
|
Our vessel operating costs are facing industry-wide cost pressures. The shipping
industry is experiencing a global manpower shortage due to significant growth in the world
fleet. This shortage has resulted in crew wage increases during 2007 and 2008, the effect
of which is included the Results of Operations. We expect a trend of increasing crew
compensation to continue during 2009. |
Page 22 of 34
|
|
|
Our financial results of operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange
rates. Under GAAP, all foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities, such
as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, advances from
affiliates and deferred income taxes are revalued and reported based on the prevailing
exchange rate at the end of the period. OPCO has entered into services agreements with
subsidiaries of Teekay Corporation whereby the subsidiaries operate and crew the vessels.
Under these service agreements, OPCO pays all vessel operating expenses in U.S. Dollars,
and will not be subject to currency exchange fluctuations until 2009. Beginning in 2009,
payments under the service agreements are adjusted to reflect any change in Teekay
Corporations cost of providing services based on fluctuations in the value of the
Norwegian Kroner relative to the U.S. Dollar, which may result in increased payments under
the services agreements if the strength of the U.S. Dollar declines relative to the
Norwegian Kroner. At June 30, 2008, we were committed to foreign exchange contracts for the
forward purchase of approximately Norwegian Kroner 345.7 million for U.S. Dollars at an
average rate of Norwegian Kroner 5.54 per U.S. Dollar, maturing in 2009 and 2010. |
|
|
|
Our operations are seasonal. Historically, the utilization of shuttle tankers in the
North Sea is higher in the winter months, as favorable weather conditions in the summer
months provide opportunities for repairs and maintenance to our vessels and to offshore oil
platforms. Downtime for repairs and maintenance generally reduces oil production and, thus,
transportation requirements. |
We manage our business and analyze and report our results of operations on the basis of three
business segments: the shuttle tanker segment, the conventional tanker segment and the FSO segment.
Shuttle Tanker Segment
Our shuttle tanker fleet consists of 37 vessels that operate under fixed-rate contracts of
affreightment, time charters and bareboat charters. Of the 37 shuttle tankers, 25 are owned by OPCO
(including 5 through 50% owned subsidiaries), 10 are chartered-in by OPCO and two are owned by us
(including one through a 50% owned subsidiary). All of these shuttle tankers provide transportation
services to energy companies, primarily in the North Sea and Brazil.
The following table presents our shuttle tanker segments operating results for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and compares its net voyage revenues (which is a non-GAAP
financial measure) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 to voyage revenues,
the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, for the same periods. The following table also
provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days by owned and chartered-in vessels for our
shuttle tanker segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
167,266 |
|
|
|
146,482 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
45,642 |
|
|
|
27,074 |
|
|
|
68.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
121,624 |
|
|
|
119,408 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
31,975 |
|
|
|
24,896 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
32,262 |
|
|
|
36,473 |
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
23,168 |
|
|
|
20,442 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
12,602 |
|
|
|
13,769 |
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
21,617 |
|
|
|
23,828 |
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,355 |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 23 of 34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
320,325 |
|
|
|
292,628 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
84,195 |
|
|
|
51,895 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
236,130 |
|
|
|
240,733 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
61,635 |
|
|
|
47,650 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
65,908 |
|
|
|
74,588 |
|
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
45,719 |
|
|
|
41,137 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
24,887 |
|
|
|
26,477 |
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
37,981 |
|
|
|
50,881 |
|
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
4,830 |
|
|
|
4,420 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,680 |
|
|
|
6,557 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and
administrative expenses (allocated to the shuttle tanker segment based on estimated use of
corporate resources). |
The average size of OPCOs owned shuttle tanker fleet increased for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to the acquisition from Teekay
Corporation in July 2007 of a 2000-built shuttle tanker (the Navion Bergen) and a 50% interest in a
2006-built shuttle-tanker (the Navion Gothenburg) (collectively, the 2007 Shuttle Tanker
Acquisitions). However, as a result of the inclusion of the Dropdown Predecessor, the Navion
Bergen had been included for accounting purposes in our results as if it was acquired on April 16,
2007, when it completed its conversion and began operations as a shuttle tanker for Teekay
Corporation. The Navion Gothenburg completed its conversion and began operations as a shuttle
tanker concurrently with our acquisition in July 2007; thus, it has not been included in the
Dropdown Predecessor. Please read Items You Should Consider When Evaluating Our Results of
Operations Our financial results reflect the results of the interests in vessels acquired from
Teekay Corporation for all periods the vessels were under common control. above.
The average size of OPCOs chartered-in shuttle tanker fleet decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to the purchase of an
in-chartered shuttle tanker, which was delivered to us in late March 2008 (or the 2008 Shuttle
Tanker Acquisition) and the redelivery of one chartered-in vessel back to its owner in December
2007.
Net Voyage Revenues. Net voyage revenues increased for the three months ended June 30, 2008
compared with the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $5.0 million due to more revenue days from shuttle tankers servicing
contracts of affreightment in the conventional spot market and earning a higher average
daily charter rate than the same period last year; |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.5 million due to the 2007 Shuttle Tanker Acquisitions (including
the impact of the Dropdown Predecessor); and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.2 million due to the redeployment of one shuttle tanker from
servicing contracts of affreightment to a time-charter effective October 2007, and
earning a higher average daily charter rate than for the same period last year; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.3 million due to an increase in bunker costs which are not passed
on to the charterer under certain contracts; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.2 million due to declining oil production at mature oil fields in
the North Sea that are serviced by certain shuttle tankers on contracts of
affreightment; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.6 million due to customer performance claims under the terms of
charter party agreements. |
Page 24 of 34
Net Voyage Revenues. Net voyage revenues decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared
with the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $5.3 million due to declining oil production at mature oil fields in
the North Sea which are serviced by certain shuttle tankers on contracts of
affreightment; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $4.0 million due to an increased number of offhire days resulting from
an increase in scheduled drydockings and unexpected repairs performed during the six
months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period last year; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $3.9 million due to an increase in bunker costs which are not passed
on to the charterer under certain contracts; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $3.8 million due to customer performance claims under the terms of
charter party agreements; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $9.2 million due to the 2007 Shuttle Tanker Acquisitions (including
the impact of the Dropdown Predecessor); |
|
|
|
an increase of $2.5 million due to the redeployment of one shuttle tanker from
servicing contracts of affreightment to a time-charter effective October 2007, and
earning a higher average daily charter rate than the same period last year; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.3 million due to more revenue days for shuttle tankers servicing
contracts of affreightment, partially offset by fewer revenue days from shuttle tankers
servicing contracts of affreightment in the conventional spot market, earning a higher
average daily charter rate, compared to the same period last year. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, from the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $3.5 million and $5.9 million, respectively, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, in salaries for crew and officers primarily due to general
wage escalations and a change in the crew rotation system; |
|
|
|
increases of $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, due to an increase in prices for consumables, freight and
lubricants; |
|
|
|
increases of $1.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, relating to the 2008 Shuttle Tanker Acquisition; and |
|
|
|
increases of $1.2 million and $2.9 million, respectively, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, relating to repairs and maintenance performed for certain
vessels during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, from the same periods last year, primarily due to the 2008 Shuttle Tanker
Acquisition and the redelivery of one chartered-in vessel back to its owner in December 2007.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, from the same periods last year, primarily due to the 2007 and 2008
Shuttle Tanker Acquisitions.
Conventional Tanker Segment
OPCO owns eleven Aframax-class conventional crude oil tankers. In June 2008, OPCO acquired the
lightering tankers SPT Explorer and SPT Navigator (collectively, the 2008 Conventional Tanker
Acquisitions), which operate under fixed-rate bareboat charters to Skaugen PetroTrans Inc., a
company in which Teekay Corporation owns a 50% beneficial interest. However, as a result of the
inclusion of the Dropdown Predecessor, the SPT Explorer and the SPT Navigator have been included
for accounting purposes in our results as if they were acquired on January 7, 2008 and March 28,
2008, respectively, when they completed construction and began operations as conventional tankers
for Teekay Corporation. Please read Items You Should Consider When Evaluating Our Results of
Operations Our financial results reflect the results of the interests in vessels acquired from
Teekay Corporation for all periods the vessels were under common control above. The remaining nine
tankers operate under fixed-rate time charters with Teekay Corporation.
Page 25 of 34
The following table presents our conventional tanker segments operating results for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and compares its net voyage revenues (which is a non-GAAP
financial measure) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 to voyage revenues,
the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, for the same periods. The following table also
provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days by owned vessels for our conventional
tanker segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
38,769 |
|
|
|
33,759 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
13,787 |
|
|
|
9,689 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
24,982 |
|
|
|
24,070 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
6,152 |
|
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,718 |
|
|
|
5,110 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
11,243 |
|
|
|
12,065 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
73,596 |
|
|
|
72,648 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
26,263 |
|
|
|
19,153 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
47,333 |
|
|
|
53,495 |
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
12,111 |
|
|
|
11,062 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,976 |
|
|
|
10,695 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
3,858 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
20,173 |
|
|
|
27,880 |
|
|
|
(27.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and
administrative expenses (allocated to the conventional tanker segment based on estimated
use of corporate resources). |
During 2007, OPCO operated ten conventional crude oil tankers, including the Navion Saga, which
was included as a conventional crude oil tanker within the conventional tanker segment until its
conversion to an FSO unit was completed and it commenced a three-year FSO time-charter contract in
early May 2007.
Net Voyage Revenues. Net voyage revenues increased during the three months ended June 30, 2008
compared with the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $2.2 due to the 2008 Conventional Tanker Acquisitions (including the
impact of the Dropdown Predecessor); and |
|
|
|
a relative increase of $1.9 million due to fewer scheduled drydockings; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.4 million in net bunker revenues (under the terms of eight of the
nine time-charter contracts with Teekay Corporation, OPCO is responsible for the bunker
fuel expenses and the approximate amounts of these expenses are added to the daily hire
rate; during the annual review of the daily hire rate in the third quarter of 2007, the
rate per day was adjusted downwards based on the average daily bunker consumption for
the preceding year); and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.1 million due to the transfer of the Navion Saga to the FSO segment
in early May 2007. |
Net Voyage Revenues. Net voyage revenues decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2008
compared with the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $7.8 million in net bunker revenues as discussed above; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $3.4 million due to the transfer of the Navion Saga to the FSO segment
in early May 2007; |
Page 26 of 34
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $3.4 million due to the 2008 Conventional Tanker Acquisitions
(including the impact of the Dropdown Predecessor); and |
|
|
|
a relative increase of $1.3 million due to fewer scheduled drydockings. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, from the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, due to an increase in repairs and maintenance and an
increase in prices for consumables, freight and lubricants; and |
|
|
|
increases of $0.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, in salaries for crew and officers primarily due to general
wage escalations; |
partially offset by;
|
|
|
decreases of $0.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, due to the transfer of the Navion Saga to the FSO segment
in early May 2007. |
FSO Segment
Our FSO fleet consists of five vessels that operate under fixed-rate time charters or fixed-rate
bareboat charters. Of the five FSO units, four are owned by OPCO and one is owned by us. FSO units
provide an on-site storage solution to oil field installations that have no oil storage facilities
or that require supplemental storage.
The following table presents our FSO segments operating results for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, and compares its net voyage revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial
measure) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 to voyage revenues, the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measure, for the same periods. The following table also provides
a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days by owned vessels for our FSO segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
18,449 |
|
|
|
12,973 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
297.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
18,067 |
|
|
|
12,877 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
7,380 |
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,561 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
35,495 |
|
|
|
20,238 |
|
|
|
75.4 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
111.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
34,765 |
|
|
|
19,892 |
|
|
|
74.8 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
13,692 |
|
|
|
8,782 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,664 |
|
|
|
7,120 |
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
2,042 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
6,367 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
181.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and
administrative expenses (allocated to the FSO segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). |
During most of 2007, we were deemed to have operated four FSO units, including the Dampier Spirit
as a result of the inclusion of the Dropdown Predecessor, which we acquired from Teekay Corporation
in October 2007. The Dampier Spirit has been included in our results as if it was acquired on
January 1, 2007. Please read Items You Should Consider When Evaluating Our Results of Operations
Our financial results reflect the results of the interests in vessels acquired from Teekay
Corporation for all periods the vessels were under common control above.
Page 27 of 34
A fifth FSO unit, the Navion Saga, was included as a conventional crude oil tanker within our
conventional tanker segment until May 2007, as discussed above. As a result of the inclusion of the
Navion Saga, income from vessel operations for the FSO segment for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 increased from the same periods in 2007. In addition, the Dampier Spirit was offhire
for 110 days during 2007 due to a scheduled drydock. Depreciation and amortization expense also
increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, from the same periods last year, due to
a change in the estimated useful life of a specific vessel upgrade on one of our FSO units.
Other Operating Results
Interest Gain (Expense). Interest gain was $23.2 million and interest expense was $44.0 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to interest gain of $10.6
million and interest expense of $9.4 million for the same periods last year. The increase in
interest gain during the three months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $11.8 million relating to the change in fair value of our interest
rate swaps; |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.0 million relating to the timing difference in the reset dates
between OPCOs loans and related interest rate swaps; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.2 million relating to the scheduled repayment of debt during 2007
and 2008 for five of our 50% owned subsidiaries; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.3 million due to the assumption of debt relating to the 2007
Shuttle Tanker Acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.1 million relating to additional debt drawn under OPCOs long-term
revolving credit facilities, which was used to partially finance the acquisition of the
2007 Shuttle Tanker Acquisitions, the Dampier Spirit, and an in-chartered shuttle
tanker, the Navion Oslo. |
The increase in interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $32.1 million relating to the change in fair value of our interest
rate swaps; |
|
|
|
an increase of $4.7 due to the assumption of debt relating to the 2007 Shuttle
Tanker Acquisitions and the increase in debt relating to the purchase of the Dampier
Spirit; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $2.1 million relating to additional debt drawn under OPCOs long-term
revolving credit facilities, which was used to partially finance the acquisition of the
2007 Shuttle Tanker Acquisitions, the Dampier Spirit and the Navion Oslo. |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.8 million relating to the scheduled repayment of debt during 2007
and 2008 for five of our 50% owned subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.6 million relating to the timing difference in the reset dates
between OPCOs loans and related interest rate swaps. |
We have not designated our interest rate swaps as hedges for accounting purposes and as such, the
unrealized changes in the fair values of the swaps are reflected in interest gain (expense) in our
consolidated statements of income.
Foreign Currency Exchange Losses. Foreign currency exchange losses were $1.1 million and $3.6
million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $4.6 million
and $8.6 million for the same periods last year. Our foreign currency exchange losses and gains,
substantially all of which are unrealized, are due primarily to the relevant period-end revaluation
of Norwegian Kroner-denominated monetary assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes.
Gains reflect a stronger U.S. Dollar against the Kroner on the date of revaluation or settlement
compared to the rate in effect at the beginning of the period. Losses reflect a weaker U.S. Dollar
against the Norwegian Kroner on the date of revaluation or settlement compared to the rate in
effect at the beginning of the period.
Income Tax Recovery. Income tax recovery was $7.5 million and $7.3 million, respectively, for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to income tax recoveries of $nil and
$4.6 million for the same periods last year. The $7.5 million and $2.7 million increase to income
tax recoveries were primarily due to increases in deferred income tax recoveries relating to
unrealized foreign exchange translation losses and operational losses for tax purposes for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
Other Income. Other income was $2.3 million and $4.9 million, respectively, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $2.6 million and $5.3 million for the same periods last
year, which was primarily comprised of leasing income from our volatile organic compound emissions
equipment.
Page 28 of 34
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity and Cash Needs
As at June 30, 2008, our total cash and cash equivalents was $113.0 million, compared to $121.2
million at December 31, 2007. Our total liquidity, including cash, cash equivalents and
undrawn long-term borrowings, was $258.8 million as at June 30, 2008, compared to $286.7
million as at December 31, 2007. The decrease in liquidity was primarily the result of the
$16.7 million cash payment made to Teekay Corporation for the purchase of the subsidiaries
that own the lightering tankers, SPT Explorer and SPT Navigator, the payment of cash
distributions by us and OPCO and expenditures for drydocking, vessels and equipment, partially
offset by cash generated by our operating activities during the six months ended June 30,
2008.
In addition to distributions on our equity interests, our primary short-term liquidity needs are
to fund general working capital requirements and drydocking expenditures, while our long-term
liquidity needs primarily relate to expansion and investment capital expenditures and other
maintenance capital expenditures and debt repayment. Expansion capital expenditures are
primarily for the purchase or construction of vessels to the extent the expenditures increase
the operating capacity of or revenue generated by our fleet, while maintenance capital
expenditures primarily consist of drydocking expenditures and expenditures to replace vessels
in order to maintain the operating capacity of or revenue generated by our fleet. Investment
capital expenditures are those capital expenditures that are neither maintenance capital
expenditures nor expansion capital expenditures.
We anticipate that our primary sources of funds for our short-term liquidity needs will be cash
flows from operations. We believe that cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet
our existing liquidity needs for at least the next 12 months. Generally, we anticipate that
our long-term sources of funds will be from cash from operations, long-term bank borrowings
and other debt or equity financings, or a combination thereof. Because we and OPCO distribute
all of our and its available cash, we expect that we and OPCO will rely upon external
financing sources, including bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity securities,
to fund acquisitions and expansion and investment capital expenditures, including any
acquisition opportunities we may pursue under the omnibus agreement with Teekay Corporation
and other of its affiliates.
Cash Flows. The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
Net cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
55,439 |
|
|
|
7,446 |
|
Net cash flow from financing activities |
|
|
85,487 |
|
|
|
(15,127 |
) |
Net cash flow from investing activities |
|
|
(149,129 |
) |
|
|
3,039 |
|
Operating Cash Flows. Net cash flow from operating activities increased to $55.4 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2008, from $7.4 million for the same period in 2007, primarily reflecting
the inclusion of the Navion Bergen and the Navion Gothenburg since April 2007 and July 2007,
respectively, partially offset by a $22.5 million increase in cash distributions paid by OPCO to
non-controlling interest owners, an increase in vessel operating expenses due to a trend of
increasing crew compensation and an increase in interest expense from the increase in debt due to
our acquisition of the SPT Explorer, the SPT Navigator, the Navion Oslo, the Navion Bergen and the
Dampier Spirit, and our 50% interest in the Navion Gothenburg. Net cash flow from operating
activities depends upon the timing and amount of drydocking expenditures, repairs and maintenance
activity, vessel additions and dispositions, foreign currency rates, changes in interest rates,
fluctuations in working capital balances and spot market hire rates. The number of vessel
drydockings tends to be uneven between years.
Financing Cash Flows. Scheduled debt repayments were $14.3 million and $6.4 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net proceeds from long-term debt of $111.3
million were used to finance our acquisition of the SPT Explorer., the SPT Navigator and the Navion
Oslo, which is explained in more detail below, and to partially fund debt prepayments and advances
to affiliate. The amount of the distribution paid to Teekay Corporation relating to the purchase of
the SPT Explorer. and the SPT Navigator was $16.7 million and is reflected as a financing cash
flow.
On June 18, 2008, we completed a follow-on public offering of 7.0 million common units at a price
of $20.00 per unit, for gross proceeds of $140.0 million. Concurrently with the public offering,
Teekay Corporation acquired 3.25 million of our common units in a private placement at the same
public offering price for $65.0 million. As a result, we raised gross equity proceeds of $209.2
million (including our general partners proportionate 2% capital contribution). The net proceeds
were used to fund the purchase of an additional 25% interest in OPCO. The excess of the purchase
price over the contributed basis of a 25% additional interest in OPCO was $93.8 million and is
reflected as a distribution to Teekay Corporation as a financing cash flow.
Cash distributions paid by us during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $16.0
million and $8.0 million, respectively. Subsequent to June 30, 2008, cash distributions for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 were declared and paid during the third quarter of 2008 and
totaled $12.4 million.
Investing Cash Flows. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, net cash used by investing
activities relates primarily to the $111.7 million acquisition from Teekay Corporation of an
additional 25% interest in OPCO. Since this ownership interest was purchased from Teekay
Corporation, the transaction was between entities under common control, and has been accounted for
at historical cost. Therefore the amount reflected as cash used in investing activities for this
purchase represents the historical cost to Teekay Corporation. During the six months ended June 30,
2008, we incurred $49.1 million of expenditures for vessels and equipment, primarily relating to
the acquisition of the Navion Oslo. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we incurred $5.2
million of expenditures for vessels and equipment. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, we received $11.7 million and $10.2 million, respectively, in scheduled repayments from the
leasing of our volatile organic compound emissions equipment.
Page 29 of 34
Credit Facilities
As at June 30, 2008, our total debt was $1.62 billion, compared to $1.52 billion as at December 31,
2007. As at June 30, 2008, we had five revolving credit facilities available, which, as at such
date, provided for borrowings of up to $1.46 billion, of which $145.8 million was undrawn. As at
June 30, 2008, each of our six 50% owned subsidiaries had an outstanding term loan, which, in
aggregate, totaled $300.3 million. The term loans for these 50% owned subsidiaries reduce in
semi-annual payments with varying maturities through 2017. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 6 Long-Term Debt.
Our five revolving credit facilities are described in Note 6, Long-Term Debt, to our consolidated
financial statements included in this report.
Three of the revolving credit facilities contain covenants that require OPCO to maintain the
greater of a minimum liquidity (cash, cash equivalents and undrawn committed revolving credit lines
with at least six months of maturity) of $75.0 million and 5.0% of OPCOs total consolidated debt.
The remaining two revolving credit facilities are guaranteed by Teekay Corporation and contain
covenants that require Teekay Corporation to maintain the greater of a minimum liquidity of
$50.0 million and 5.0% of Teekay Corporations total debt, which has recourse to Teekay
Corporation. As at June 30, 2008, we, OPCO and, to our knowledge, Teekay Corporation were in
compliance with all of our and its covenants under these credit facilities.
The term loans of our 50% owned subsidiaries are collateralized by first-priority mortgages on the
vessels to which the loans relate, together with other related security. As at June 30, 2008, we
had guaranteed $99.0 million of these term loans, which represents our 50% share of the outstanding
vessel mortgage debt in five of these 50% owned subsidiaries. The other owner and Teekay
Corporation have guaranteed the remaining $201.3 million.
Interest payments on the revolving credit facilities and term loans are based on LIBOR plus a
margin. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the margins ranged between 0.45% and 0.80%.
All of our vessel financings are collateralized by the applicable vessels. The term loans used to
finance the six 50% owned subsidiaries and our revolving credit facility agreements contain typical
covenants and other restrictions, including those that restrict the relevant subsidiaries from:
|
|
|
incurring or guaranteeing indebtedness (applicable to our term loans and two of our
revolving credit facility facilities); |
|
|
|
changing ownership or structure, including by mergers, consolidations, liquidations and
dissolutions; |
|
|
|
making dividends or distributions when in default of the relevant loans; |
|
|
|
making capital expenditures in excess of specified levels; |
|
|
|
making certain negative pledges or granting certain liens; |
|
|
|
selling, transferring, assigning or conveying assets; or |
|
|
|
entering into a new line of business. |
We conduct our funding and treasury activities within corporate policies designed to minimize
borrowing costs and maximize investment returns while maintaining the safety of the funds and
appropriate levels of liquidity for our purposes. We hold cash and cash equivalents primarily in
U.S. Dollars.
Contractual Obligations and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations as at June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
Beyond |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
|
1,618.5 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
259.2 |
|
|
|
316.4 |
|
|
|
989.8 |
|
Chartered-in vessels (operating leases) |
|
|
427.6 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
173.1 |
|
|
|
118.7 |
|
|
|
75.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
|
2,046.1 |
|
|
|
113.1 |
|
|
|
432.3 |
|
|
|
435.1 |
|
|
|
1,065.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $28.0 million (second half of 2008), $101.0 million
(2009 and 2010), $80.4 million (2011 and 2012) and $64.0 million (beyond 2012). Expected
interest payments are based on LIBOR plus margins which ranged between 0.45% and 0.80% as at
June 30, 2008. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make
estimates in the application of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions, judgments
and opinions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions,
estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly
and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined
with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such
differences could be material. Accounting estimates and assumptions that we consider to be the most
critical to an understanding of our financial statements because they inherently involve
significant judgments and uncertainties, can be found in Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects, in our Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Page 30 of 34
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 6-K for the three months ended June 30, 2008 contains certain forward-looking
statements (as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) concerning future
events and our operations, performance and financial condition, including, in particular,
statements regarding:
|
|
|
our future growth prospects; |
|
|
|
results of operations and revenues and expenses; |
|
|
|
offshore and tanker market fundamentals, including the balance of supply and demand
in the offshore and tanker market; |
|
|
|
future capital expenditures and availability of capital resources to fund capital
expenditures; |
|
|
|
offers of shuttle tankers, FSOs and FPSOs and related contracts from Teekay
Corporation; |
|
|
|
obtaining offshore projects that we or Teekay Corporation bid on or have been
awarded; |
|
|
|
delivery dates of and financing for newbuildings or existing vessels; |
|
|
|
the commencement of service of newbuildings or existing vessels; |
|
|
|
our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, particularly in Norwegian Kroner; and |
|
|
|
the outcome of claims and legal action arising from the collision involving the
Navion Hispania. |
Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast,
indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words believe,
anticipate, expect, estimate, project, will be, will continue, will likely result,
plan, intend or words or phrases of similar meanings. These statements involve known and
unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently subject
to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual
results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited
to: changes in production of oil from offshore oil fields; changes in the demand for offshore oil
transportation, production and storage services; greater or less than anticipated levels of vessel
newbuilding orders or greater or less than anticipated rates of vessel scrapping; changes in
trading patterns; changes in applicable industry laws and regulations and the timing of
implementation of new laws and regulations; potential inability to implement our growth strategy;
competitive factors in the markets in which we operate; potential for early termination of
long-term contracts and our potential inability to renew or replace long-term contracts; loss of
any customer, time charter or vessel; shipyard production or vessel delivery delays; our potential
inability to raise financing to purchase additional vessels; our exposure to currency exchange rate
fluctuations; changes to the amount of proportion of revenues and expenses denominated in foreign
currencies; and other factors detailed from time to time in our periodic reports filed with the
SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2007. We do not
intend to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained
herein to reflect any change in our expectations with respect thereto or any change in events,
conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Page 31 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2008
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowings that require
us to make interest payments based on LIBOR. Significant increases in interest rates could
adversely affect operating margins, results of operations and our ability to service debt. We use
interest rate swaps to reduce exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates. The principal
objective of these contracts is to minimize the risks and costs associated with the floating-rate
debt.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, we only enter into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A or better by Standard & Poors or Aa3 by Moodys at the time of the
transactions. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps are entered
into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
The table below provides information about financial instruments as at June 30, 2008 that are
sensitive to changes in interest rates. For long-term debt, the table presents principal payments
and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For interest rate swaps,
the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by expected contractual
maturity dates.
Expected Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Rate (1) |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages) |
|
Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate (2) |
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
|
132.3 |
|
|
|
169.3 |
|
|
|
147.1 |
|
|
|
989.8 |
|
|
|
1,618.5 |
|
|
|
(1,618.5 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount (3) |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
552.6 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
723.7 |
|
|
|
1,340.9 |
|
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (2) |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for our debt, including the
margin paid on our floating-rate debt and the average fixed pay rate for interest rate swaps.
The average fixed pay rate for interest rate swaps excludes the margin paid on the
floating-rate debt, which as of June 30, 2008 ranged from 0.50% to 0.80%. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest payments on floating-rate debt and interest rate swaps are based on LIBOR. |
|
(3) |
|
The average variable receive rate for interest rate swaps is set quarterly at the 3-month
LIBOR or semi-annually at the 6-month LIBOR. |
Foreign Currency Risk
Our primary economic environment is the international shipping market. This market utilizes the
U.S. Dollar as its functional currency. Consequently, virtually all of our revenues and most of our
operating costs are in U.S. Dollars. We incur certain vessel operating expenses and general and
administrative expenses in foreign currencies, the most significant of which is the Norwegian
Kroner and, to a lesser extent, Australian Dollars, British Pounds, Euros and Singapore Dollars.
There is a risk that currency fluctuations will have a negative effect on the value of cash flows.
On the closing of our initial public offering in December 2006, OPCO entered into new services
agreements with subsidiaries of Teekay Corporation whereby the subsidiaries operate and crew OPCOs
vessels. Under these service agreements, OPCO pays all vessel operating expenses in U.S. Dollars
and will not be subject to Norwegian Kroner exchange fluctuations until 2009. Beginning in 2009,
payments under the service agreements are adjusted to reflect any change in Teekay Corporations
cost of providing services based on fluctuations in the value of the Norwegian Kroner relative to
the U.S. Dollar. We have begun to hedge this currency fluctuation risk. At June 30, 2008, we were
committed to foreign exchange contracts for the forward purchase of approximately Norwegian Kroner
345.7 million, Australian Dollars 1.3 million, British Pounds 0.9 million, and Euros 11.8 million
for U.S. Dollars at an average rate of Norwegian Kroner 5.54 per U.S. Dollar, Australian Dollar
1.18 per U.S. Dollar, British Pound 0.52 per U.S. Dollar, and Euro 0.65 per U.S. Dollar. The
foreign exchange forward contracts mature as follows: $11.2 million in 2008; $67.6 million in 2009;
and $4.7 million in 2010.
Although the majority of transactions, assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. Dollars, OPCO
had Norwegian Kroner-denominated deferred income taxes of approximately 361.9 ($71.1 million) at
June 30, 2008. Neither we nor OPCO has entered into any forward contracts to protect against
currency fluctuations on any future taxes.
Page 32 of 34
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2008
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
On November 13, 2006, a Teekay Offshore Operating L.P. (or OPCO) shuttle tanker, the Navion
Hispania, collided with the Njord Bravo, a floating storage and offtake unit, while
preparing to load an oil cargo from the Njord Bravo. The Njord Bravo services the Njord
field, which is operated by StatoilHydro Petroleum AS (or StatoilHydro) and is located off
the Norwegian coast. At the time of the incident, StatoilHydro was chartering the Navion
Hispania from OPCO. The Navion Hispania and the Njord Bravo both incurred damages as a
result of the collision.
In November 2007, Navion Offshore Loading AS, a subsidiary of OPCO, and two subsidiaries of
Teekay Corporation were named as co-defendants in a legal action filed by Norwegian Hull
Club (the hull and machinery insurers of the Njord Bravo), StatoilHydro and various
licensees in the Njord field. The claim seeks damages for vessel repairs, expenses for a
replacement vessel and other amounts related to production stoppage on the field, totaling
NOK256,000,000 (or approximately USD$37 million). As anticipated, the Stavanger
Conciliation Council has referred the matter to the Stavanger District Court. The claimants
must continue the proceedings by September 1, 2009 in order to avoid the matter being
time-barred.
The Partnership believes the likelihood of any losses relating to the claim is remote. The
Partnership believes that the charter contract relating to the Navion Hispania requires that
StatoilHydro be responsible and indemnify Navion Offshore Loading AS for all losses relating
to the damage to the Njord Bravo. OPCO and Teekay Corporation also maintain insurance for
damages to the Navion Hispania and insurance for collision-related costs and claims. The
Partnership believes that these insurance policies will cover the costs related to this
incident, including any costs not indemnified by StatoilHydro, subject to standard
deductibles. In addition, Teekay Corporation has agreed to indemnify the Partnership, OPCO
and OPCOs subsidiaries for any losses they may incur in connection with this incident.
Item 1A Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report on Form 6-K, you should
carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 3. Key Information Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, which
could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. There
have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our 2007 Annual
Report on Form 20-F/A.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5 Other Information
None
Item 6 Exhibits
None
THIS REPORT ON FORM 6-K IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FOLLOWING REGISTRATION
STATEMENT OF THE PARTNERSHIP:
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (NO. 333-147682) FILED WITH THE SEC ON NOVEMBER 28,
2007 |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (NO. 333-150682) FILED WITH THE SEC ON MAY 6, 2008 |
Page 33 of 34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Teekay Offshore GP L.L.C., its general partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 2, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Peter Evensen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Evensen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
Page 34 of 34