UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended May 1, 2010
Commission File Number 1-6049
TARGET CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota |
|
41-0215170 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
1000 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota |
|
55403 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 612/304-6073
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller Reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. Total shares of common stock, par value $.0833, outstanding at May 26, 2010 were 736,470,956.
TARGET CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
||
|
||
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
12 |
|
19 |
||
19 |
||
|
|
|
|
||
20 |
||
20 |
||
20 |
||
21 |
||
21 |
||
21 |
||
21 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
24 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
Three Months Ended |
||||||
|
|
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
|
||
(millions, except per share data) (unaudited) |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Sales |
|
|
$ |
15,158 |
|
$ |
14,361 |
|
Credit card revenues |
|
|
435 |
|
472 |
|
||
Total revenues |
|
|
15,593 |
|
14,833 |
|
||
Cost of sales |
|
|
10,412 |
|
9,936 |
|
||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,143 |
|
3,015 |
|
||
Credit card expenses |
|
|
280 |
|
384 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
516 |
|
472 |
|
||
Earnings before interest expense and income taxes |
|
|
1,242 |
|
1,026 |
|
||
Net interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Nonrecourse debt collateralized by credit card receivables |
|
|
23 |
|
26 |
|
||
Other interest expense |
|
|
165 |
|
177 |
|
||
Interest income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
||
Net interest expense |
|
|
187 |
|
202 |
|
||
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
1,055 |
|
824 |
|
||
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
384 |
|
302 |
|
||
Net earnings |
|
|
$ |
671 |
|
$ |
522 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
|
739.9 |
|
752.2 |
|
||
Diluted |
|
|
745.7 |
|
753.0 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
|
|
May 1, |
|
January 30 |
, |
May 2, |
|
|||
(millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|||
Assets |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents, including marketable securities of $1,015, $1,617 and $849 |
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
$ |
1,371 |
|
Credit card receivables, net of allowance of $930, $1,016 and $1,005 |
|
6,330 |
|
6,966 |
|
7,452 |
|
|||
Inventory |
|
7,249 |
|
7,179 |
|
6,993 |
|
|||
Other current assets |
|
2,065 |
|
2,079 |
|
1,735 |
|
|||
Total current assets |
|
17,222 |
|
18,424 |
|
17,551 |
|
|||
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Land |
|
5,803 |
|
5,793 |
|
5,775 |
|
|||
Buildings and improvements |
|
22,332 |
|
22,152 |
|
20,994 |
|
|||
Fixtures and equipment |
|
4,597 |
|
4,743 |
|
4,295 |
|
|||
Computer hardware and software |
|
2,428 |
|
2,575 |
|
2,504 |
|
|||
Construction-in-progress |
|
497 |
|
502 |
|
1,427 |
|
|||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(10,445 |
) |
(10,485 |
) |
(9,195 |
) |
|||
Property and equipment, net |
|
25,212 |
|
25,280 |
|
25,800 |
|
|||
Other noncurrent assets |
|
889 |
|
829 |
|
861 |
|
|||
Total assets |
|
$ |
43,323 |
|
$ |
44,533 |
|
$ |
44,212 |
|
Liabilities and shareholders investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
$ |
6,511 |
|
$ |
6,004 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
3,183 |
|
3,120 |
|
2,990 |
|
|||
Unsecured debt and other borrowings |
|
797 |
|
796 |
|
1,255 |
|
|||
Nonrecourse debt collateralized by credit card receivables |
|
67 |
|
900 |
|
|
|
|||
Total current liabilities |
|
10,197 |
|
11,327 |
|
10,249 |
|
|||
Unsecured debt and other borrowings |
|
10,642 |
|
10,643 |
|
12,012 |
|
|||
Nonrecourse debt collateralized by credit card receivables |
|
4,152 |
|
4,475 |
|
5,502 |
|
|||
Deferred income taxes |
|
916 |
|
835 |
|
487 |
|
|||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
1,819 |
|
1,906 |
|
1,843 |
|
|||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
|
17,529 |
|
17,859 |
|
19,844 |
|
|||
Shareholders investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Common stock |
|
62 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
|
|||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
3,010 |
|
2,919 |
|
2,788 |
|
|||
Retained earnings |
|
13,098 |
|
12,947 |
|
11,821 |
|
|||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(573 |
) |
(581 |
) |
(553 |
) |
|||
Total shareholders investment |
|
15,597 |
|
15,347 |
|
14,119 |
|
|||
Total liabilities and shareholders investment |
|
$ |
43,323 |
|
$ |
44,533 |
|
$ |
44,212 |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
738.9 |
|
744.6 |
|
752.0 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Three Months Ended |
||||||
|
|
|
May 1 |
, |
May 2 |
, |
||
(millions) (unaudited) |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net earnings |
|
|
$ |
671 |
|
$ |
522 |
|
Reconciliation to cash flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
516 |
|
472 |
|
||
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
25 |
|
24 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
109 |
|
69 |
|
||
Bad debt expense |
|
|
197 |
|
296 |
|
||
Loss/impairment of property and equipment, net |
|
|
8 |
|
18 |
|
||
Other non-cash items affecting earnings |
|
|
22 |
|
10 |
|
||
Changes in operating accounts providing/(requiring) cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable originated at Target |
|
|
201 |
|
160 |
|
||
Inventory |
|
|
(70 |
) |
(288 |
) |
||
Other current assets |
|
|
(94 |
) |
27 |
|
||
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
|
(361 |
) |
(333 |
) |
||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
|
63 |
|
113 |
|
||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(91 |
) |
(91 |
) |
||
Cash flow provided by operations |
|
|
1,158 |
|
999 |
|
||
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expenditures for property and equipment |
|
|
(407 |
) |
(540 |
) |
||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
12 |
|
6 |
|
||
Change in accounts receivable originated at third parties |
|
|
238 |
|
175 |
|
||
Other investments |
|
|
(18 |
) |
(13 |
) |
||
Cash flow required for investing activities |
|
|
(175 |
) |
(372 |
) |
||
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Reductions of long-term debt |
|
|
(1,170 |
) |
(1 |
) |
||
Dividends paid |
|
|
(126 |
) |
(121 |
) |
||
Repurchase of stock |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
||
Stock option exercises and related tax benefit |
|
|
69 |
|
2 |
|
||
Cash flow required for financing activities |
|
|
(1,605 |
) |
(120 |
) |
||
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(622 |
) |
507 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
2,200 |
|
864 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
$ |
1,371 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
||||||||
(millions, except footnotes) |
|
Common |
|
Stock |
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Pension and |
|
Derivative |
|
Total |
|
||||||
January 31, 2009 |
|
752.7 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
2,762 |
|
$ |
11,443 |
|
$ |
(510 |
) |
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
13,712 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
||||||
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Pension and other benefit liability adjustments, net of taxes of $17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
||||||
Net change on cash flow hedges, net of taxes of $2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
||||||
Currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,463 |
|
||||||
Dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(503 |
) |
||||||
Repurchase of stock |
|
(9.9 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(482 |
) |
||||||
Stock options and awards |
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
||||||
January 30, 2010 |
|
744.6 |
|
$ |
62 |
|
$ |
2,919 |
|
$ |
12,947 |
|
$ |
(537 |
) |
$ |
(44 |
) |
$ |
15,347 |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
|
671 |
|
||||||
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Pension and other benefit liability adjustments, net of taxes of $3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
||||||
Net change on cash flow hedges, net of taxes of $0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
||||||
Currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679 |
|
||||||
Dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
||||||
Repurchase of stock |
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
||||||
Stock options and awards |
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
||||||
May 1, 2010 |
|
738.9 |
|
$ |
62 |
|
$ |
3,010 |
|
$ |
13,098 |
|
$ |
(532 |
) |
$ |
(41 |
) |
$ |
15,597 |
|
Dividends declared per share were $0.17 and $0.16 for the three months ended May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively. For the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010, dividends declared per share were $0.67.
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
1. Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statement disclosures contained in the 2009 Form 10-K for Target Corporation (Target or the Corporation). The same accounting policies are followed in preparing quarterly financial data as are followed in preparing annual data. See Note 1 in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 for those policies. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of quarterly operating results are reflected herein and are of a normal, recurring nature.
Due to the seasonal nature of our business, quarterly revenues, expenses, earnings and cash flows are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.
2. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is net earnings divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS includes the incremental shares assumed to be issued upon the exercise of stock options and under performance share and restricted stock unit arrangements.
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
Diluted EPS |
|
||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||||
Earnings Per Share |
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
|
||||
(millions, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
671 |
|
$ |
522 |
|
$ |
671 |
|
$ |
522 |
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
739.9 |
|
752.2 |
|
739.9 |
|
752.2 |
|
||||
Incremental stock options, performance share units and restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
0.8 |
|
||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
739.9 |
|
752.2 |
|
745.7 |
|
753.0 |
|
||||
Earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
For the May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009 computations, 11.6 million and 33.8 million stock options, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of weighted average shares for diluted EPS because their effects were antidilutive.
3. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liabilitys fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Fair value measurements are categorized into one of three levels based on the lowest level of significant input used: Level 1 (unadjusted quoted prices in active markets); Level 2 (observable market inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1); and Level 3 (unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data).
The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring Basis |
|
Fair Value at |
|
Fair Value at |
|
Fair Value at |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Marketable securities |
|
$ |
1,015 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Prepaid forward contracts |
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest rate swaps(a) |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Company-owned life insurance investments(b) |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
$ |
461 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
$ |
436 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
$ |
462 |
|
$ |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
|
|
(a) |
There were no interest rate swaps designated as accounting hedges at May 1, 2010, January 30, 2010 or May 2, 2009. |
(b) |
Company-owned life insurance investments consist of equity index funds and fixed income assets. Amounts are presented net of loans of $236 million at May 1, 2010, $244 million at January 30, 2010, and $197 million at May 2, 2009 that are secured by some of these policies. |
Position |
|
Valuation Technique |
Marketable securities |
|
Initially valued at transaction price. Carrying value of cash equivalents (including money market funds) approximates fair value because maturities are less than three months. |
|
|
|
Prepaid forward contracts |
|
Initially valued at transaction price. Subsequently valued by reference to the market price of Target common stock. |
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps/ forward and equity swaps |
|
Valuation models are calibrated to initial trade price. Subsequent valuations are based on observable inputs to the valuation model (e.g., interest rates and credit spreads). Model inputs are changed only when corroborated by market data. A credit risk adjustment is made on each swap using observable market credit spreads. |
|
|
|
Company-owned life insurance investments |
|
Includes investments in separate accounts that are valued based on market rates credited by the insurer. |
Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The fair value measurements related to long-lived assets held for sale and held and used in the following table were determined using available market prices at the measurement date based on recent investments or pending transactions of similar assets, third-party independent appraisals, valuation multiples or public comparables. We classify these measurements as Level 2.
Fair Value Measurements Nonrecurring Basis |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Other current assets |
|
Property and equipment |
|
||
|
|
Long-lived assets |
|
Long-lived assets |
|
||
(millions) |
|
held for sale(a) |
|
held and used(b) |
|
||
Measured as of May 1, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Carrying amount |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
Fair value measurement |
|
|
|
26 |
|
||
Gain/(loss) |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
||
Measured as of May 2, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Carrying amount |
|
30 |
|
11 |
|
||
Fair value measurement |
|
24 |
|
6 |
|
||
Gain/(loss) |
|
(6 |
) |
(5 |
) |
||
(a) |
Reported measurement is fair value less cost to sell. Costs to sell were approximately $2 million at May 2, 2009. |
(b) |
Primarily relates to real estate and buildings intended for sale in the future but not currently meeting the held for sale criteria. |
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments not measured at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. The fair value of marketable securities is determined using available market prices at the reporting date. The fair value of debt is measured using a discounted cash flow analysis based on our current market interest rates for similar types of financial instruments.
Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value |
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
||
(millions) |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
||
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Marketable securities(a) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Marketable securities(a) |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
37 |
|
$ |
37 |
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total debt(b) |
|
$ |
15,291 |
|
$ |
16,659 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,291 |
|
$ |
16,659 |
|
(a) |
Amounts include held-to-maturity government and money market investments that are held to satisfy the regulatory requirements of Target Bank and Target National Bank. |
(b) |
Represents the sum of nonrecourse debt collateralized by credit card receivables and unsecured debt and other borrowings excluding unamortized swap valuation adjustments and capital lease obligations. |
The carrying amounts of credit card receivables, net of allowance, accounts payable, and certain accrued and other current liabilities approximate fair value at May 1, 2010.
Credit card receivables are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance, recognized in an amount equal to the anticipated future write-offs of existing receivables, was $930 million at May 1, 2010, $1,016 million at January 30, 2010 and $1,005 million at May 2, 2009. This allowance includes provisions for uncollectible finance charges and other credit-related fees. We estimate future write-offs based on historical experience of delinquencies, risk scores, aging trends, and industry risk trends. Substantially all accounts continue to accrue finance charges until they are written off. Total receivables past due ninety days or more and still accruing finance charges were $279 million at May 1, 2010 and $371 million at both January 30, 2010 and May 2, 2009. Accounts are written off when they become 180 days past due.
Under certain circumstances, we offer cardholder payment plans that modify finance charges and minimum payments, which meet the accounting definition of a troubled debt restructuring (TDRs). These concessions are made on an individual cardholder basis for economic or legal reasons specific to each individual cardholders circumstances. As a percentage of period-end gross receivables, receivables classified as TDRs were 6.5 percent at May 1, 2010, 6.7 percent at January 30, 2010, and 6.1 percent at May 2, 2009. Receivables classified as TDRs are treated consistently with other aged receivables in determining our allowance for doubtful accounts.
As a method of providing funding for our credit card receivables, we sell on an ongoing basis all of our consumer credit card receivables to Target Receivables Corporation (TRC), a wholly owned, bankruptcy remote subsidiary. TRC then transfers the receivables to the Target Credit Card Master Trust (the Trust), which from time to time will sell debt securities to third parties either directly or through a related trust. These debt securities represent undivided interests in the Trust assets. TRC uses the proceeds from the sale of debt securities and its share of collections on the receivables to pay the purchase price of the receivables to the Corporation.
We consolidate the receivables within the Trust and any debt securities issued by the Trust, or a related trust, in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. The receivables transferred to the Trust are not available to general creditors of the Corporation. The payments to the holders of the debt securities issued by the Trust or the related trust are made solely from the assets transferred to the Trust or the related trust and are nonrecourse to the general assets of the Corporation. Upon termination of the securitization program and repayment of all debt securities, any remaining assets could be distributed to the Corporation in a liquidation of TRC.
In the second quarter of 2008, we sold an interest in our credit card receivables to a JPMorgan Chase affiliate (JPMC). The interest sold represented 47 percent of the receivables portfolio at the time of the transaction. This transaction was accounted for as a secured borrowing, and accordingly, the credit card receivables within the Trust and the note payable issued are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Notwithstanding this accounting treatment, the accounts receivable assets that collateralize the note payable supply the cash flow to pay principal and interest to the note holder; the receivables are not available to general creditors of the Corporation; and the payments to JPMC are made solely from the Trust and are nonrecourse to the general assets of the Corporation. Interest and principal payments due on the note are satisfied provided the cash flows from the Trust assets are sufficient. If the cash flows are less than the periodic interest, the available amount, if any, is paid with respect to interest. Interest shortfalls will be paid to the extent subsequent cash flows from the assets in the Trust are sufficient. Future principal payments will be made from JPMCs prorata share of cash flows from the Trust assets.
In the event of a decrease in the receivables principal amount such that JPMCs interest in the entire portfolio would exceed 47 percent for three consecutive months, TRC (using the cash flows from the assets in the Trust) would be required to pay JPMC a pro rata amount of principal collections such that the portion owned by JPMC would not exceed 47 percent, unless JPMC provides a waiver. Conversely, at the option of the Corporation, JPMC may be required to fund an increase in the portfolio to maintain their 47 percent interest up to a maximum JPMC principal balance of $4.2 billion. Due to the continuing declines in gross credit card receivables, TRC repaid JPMC $268 million in April 2010 and $163 million in November 2009 under the terms of this agreement. On May 25, 2010, TRC repaid an additional $67 million to JPMC.
If a three-month average of monthly finance charge excess (JPMCs prorata share of finance charge collections less write-offs and specified expenses) is less than 2 percent of the outstanding principal balance of JPMCs interest, the Corporation must implement mutually agreed upon underwriting strategies. If the three-month average finance charge excess falls below 1 percent of the outstanding principal balance of JPMCs interest, JPMC may compel the Corporation to implement underwriting and collections activities, provided those activities are compatible with the Corporations systems, as well as consistent with similar credit card receivable portfolios managed by JPMC. If the Corporation fails to implement the activities, JPMC has the right to cause the accelerated repayment of the note payable issued in the transaction. As noted in the preceding paragraph, payments would be made solely from the Trust assets.
We are exposed to claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business and use various methods to resolve these matters in a manner that we believe serves the best interest of our shareholders and other constituents. We believe the recorded reserves in our consolidated financial statements are adequate in light of the probable and estimable liabilities. We do not believe that any of the currently identified claims or litigation matters will materially affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
We obtain short-term financing from time to time under our commercial paper program, a form of notes payable. There were no amounts outstanding under our commercial paper program at May 1, 2010, January 30, 2010, or May 2, 2009.
In April 2010, TRC repurchased and retired the entire $900 million series of nonrecourse debt collateralized by credit card receivables, at par, that otherwise would have matured on October 25, 2010. No gain or loss was recorded other than insignificant expenses associated with retiring this debt.
In addition, TRC has made payments to JPMC to reduce its interest in our credit card receivables as described in Note 4, Credit Card Receivables.
Derivative financial instruments are reported at fair value on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Our derivative instruments have been primarily interest rate swaps. We use these derivatives to mitigate our interest rate risk. We have counterparty credit risk resulting from our derivative instruments. This risk lies primarily with two global financial institutions. We monitor this concentration of counterparty credit risk on an ongoing basis.
Historically, the majority of our derivative instruments qualified for fair value hedge accounting treatment. During 2008, we terminated or de-designated certain interest rate swaps. Total net gains amortized into net interest expense for terminated or de-designated swaps were $11 million and $18 million during the three months ended May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively. The amount remaining on unamortized hedged debt valuation gains from terminated or de-designated interest rate swaps that will be amortized into earnings over the remaining lives totaled $186 million, $197 million and $245 million, at May 1, 2010, January 30, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively.
Periodic payments, valuation adjustments and amortization of gains or losses related to derivative contracts are summarized below:
Derivative Contracts Effect on Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
(millions) |
|
|
|
Income/(Expense) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
||
Type |
|
Classification of Income/(Expense) |
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
||
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
Other interest expense |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
16 |
|
At May 1, 2010, there were no derivative instruments designated as accounting hedges.
For further description of the fair value measurement of derivative contracts and their classification on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, see Note 3, Fair Value Measurements.
8. Income Taxes
We file a U.S. federal income tax return and income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations for years before 2008 and, with few exceptions, are no longer subject to state and local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2003.
We accrue for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest.
During the first quarter of 2010, we filed a tax accounting method change that resolved the uncertainty surrounding the timing of deductions for one of our tax positions, resulting in a $130 million decrease to our unrecognized tax benefit liability. Because this matter solely related to the timing of the deduction, this change had virtually no effect on net tax expense in the first quarter of 2010. As of May 1, 2010, our unrecognized tax benefit liability was $338 million.
It is possible that up to $55 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of May 1, 2010 will be recognized within the next twelve months as a variety of issues may be resolved. If these issues are favorably resolved, they would result in a corresponding reduction to income tax expense of approximately the same amount.
9. Share Repurchase
Since the inception of our share repurchase program, which began in the fourth quarter of 2007, we have repurchased 111.1 million shares of our common stock, for a total cash investment of $5,713 million (average price per share of $51.42).
During the three months ended May 1, 2010, we repurchased 7.5 million shares of our common stock, including 0.3 million shares through settlement of prepaid forward contracts, for a total cash investment of $394 million (average price per share of $52.27), of which $15 million was paid in prior periods. The prepaid forward contracts settled during the three months
ended May 1, 2010 had a total cash investment of $15 million and an aggregate market value of $16 million at their respective settlement dates.
During the three months ended May 2, 2009, we repurchased 0.7 million shares of our common stock, for a total cash investment of $22 million ($30.09 per share), of which $12 million was paid in prior periods. All the shares reacquired during the three months ended May 2, 2009 were delivered upon settlement of prepaid forward contracts. The prepaid forward contracts settled during the three months ended May 2, 2009 had a total cash investment of $22 million and an aggregate market value of $23 million at their respective settlement dates.
See Note 10, Pension, Postretirement Health Care and Other Benefits, for further details of our prepaid forward contracts.
We have qualified defined benefit pension plans covering team members who meet age and service requirements, including in certain circumstances, date of hire. We also have unfunded, nonqualified pension plans for team members with qualified plan compensation restrictions. Eligibility for, and the level of, these benefits varies depending on team members date of hire, length of service and/or team member compensation. Upon early retirement and prior to Medicare eligibility, team members also become eligible for certain health care benefits if they meet minimum age and service requirements and agree to contribute a portion of the cost. Effective January 1, 2009, our qualified defined benefit pension plan was closed to new participants, with limited exceptions.
The following table provides a summary of the amounts recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position for our postretirement benefit plans:
Net Pension and Postretirement |
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Postretirement Health Care Benefit |
|
||||||||
Health Care Benefits Expense |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||||
(millions) |
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
|
||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
32 |
|
31 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
||||
Expected return on assets |
|
(48 |
) |
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Recognized losses |
|
11 |
|
6 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
||||
Recognized prior service cost |
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
|
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
We also maintain a nonqualified, unfunded deferred compensation plan for approximately 3,500 current and retired team members whose participation in our 401(k) plan is limited by statute or regulation. These team members choose from a menu of crediting rate alternatives that are the same as the investment choices in our 401(k) plan, including Target common stock. We credit an additional two percent per year to the accounts of all active participants, excluding executive officer participants, in part to recognize the risks inherent to their participation in a plan of this nature. We also maintain a nonqualified, unfunded deferred compensation plan that was frozen during 1996, covering 11 current and 50 retired participants. In this plan, deferred compensation earns returns tied to market levels of interest rates plus an additional six percent return, with a minimum of 12 percent and a maximum of 20 percent, as determined by the plans terms.
We control some of our risk of offering the nonqualified plans by investing in vehicles that offset a substantial portion of our economic exposure to the returns of the plans. These investment vehicles include company-owned life insurance on approximately 4,000 highly compensated, current and former team members who have given their consent to be insured and prepaid forward contracts in our own common stock. All of these investments are general corporate assets and are marked-to-market with the related gains and losses recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period they occur.
The total change in fair value for contracts indexed to our own common stock recorded in earnings was a pretax gain of $7 million and $19 million for the three months ended May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively. For the three months ended May 1, 2010, we made no investments in prepaid forward contracts in our own common stock. For the three months ended May 2, 2009, we invested approximately $9 million in such investment instruments, and these investments are included in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows within other investing activities. Adjusting our position in these investment vehicles may involve repurchasing shares of Target common stock when settling the forward contracts. For the three months
ended May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, these repurchases totaled 0.3 million and 0.7 million shares, respectively, and are included in the total share repurchases described in Note 9, Share Repurchase.
At May 1, 2010, January 30, 2010 and May 2, 2009, our outstanding interest in contracts indexed to our common stock was as follows:
Prepaid Forward Contracts on Target |
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Number of |
|
Price Paid |
|
Fair |
|
Total Cash |
|||
(millions, except per share data) |
|
Shares |
|
per Share |
|
Value |
|
Investment |
|||
May 2, 2009 |
|
1.8 |
|
$ |
41.11 |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
76 |
January 30, 2010 |
|
1.5 |
|
42.77 |
|
79 |
|
66 |
|||
May 1, 2010 |
|
1.2 |
|
41.67 |
|
69 |
|
51 |
|||
11. Segment Reporting
Our measure of profit for each segment is a measure that management considers analytically useful in measuring the return we are achieving on our investment.
Business Segment Results |
|
Three Months Ended May 1, 2010 |
|
|
Three Months Ended May 2, 2009 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
||||||
(millions) |
|
Retail |
|
Card |
|
Total |
|
|
Retail |
|
Card |
|
Total |
|
||||||
Sales/Credit card revenues |
|
$ |
15,158 |
|
$ |
435 |
|
$ |
15,593 |
|
|
$ |
14,361 |
|
$ |
472 |
|
$ |
14,833 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
10,412 |
|
|
|
10,412 |
|
|
9,936 |
|
|
|
9,936 |
|
||||||
Bad debt expense(a) |
|
|
|
197 |
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
296 |
|
||||||
Selling, general and administrative/Operations and marketing expenses(a), (b) |
|
3,126 |
|
100 |
|
3,226 |
|
|
2,995 |
|
107 |
|
3,103 |
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
512 |
|
4 |
|
516 |
|
|
468 |
|
4 |
|
472 |
|
||||||
Earnings before interest expense and income taxes |
|
1,108 |
|
134 |
|
1,242 |
|
|
962 |
|
65 |
|
1,026 |
|
||||||
Interest expense on nonrecourse debt collateralized by credit card receivables |
|
|
|
23 |
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
26 |
|
||||||
Segment profit |
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
$ |
111 |
|
1,219 |
|
|
$ |
962 |
|
$ |
39 |
|
1,000 |
|
||
Unallocated (income)/expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Other interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
||||||
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
824 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The combination of bad debt expense and operations and marketing expenses within the Credit Card Segment represent credit card expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
(b) |
New account and loyalty rewards redeemed by our guests reduce reported sales. Our Retail Segment charges the cost of these discounts to our Credit Card Segment, and the reimbursements of $17 million for the three months ended May 1, 2010 and $20 million for the three months ended May 2, 2009 are recorded as a reduction to SG&A expenses within the Retail Segment and an increase to operations and marketing expenses within the Credit Card Segment. |
Note: The sum of the segment amounts may not equal the total amounts due to rounding.
Total Assets by Segment |
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|||||||||
(millions) |
|
Retail |
|
Card |
|
Total |
|
Retail |
|
Card |
|
Total |
|
Retail |
|
Card |
|
Total |
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
36,633 |
|
$ |
6,690 |
|
$ |
43,323 |
|
$ |
37,200 |
|
$ |
7,333 |
|
$ |
44,533 |
|
$ |
36,389 |
|
$ |
7,823 |
|
$ |
44,212 |
|
Substantially all of our revenues are generated in, and long-lived assets are located in, the United States.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Summary
Our financial results for the first quarter of 2010 reflect better than expected earnings from both our Retail and Credit Card Segments. Performance in our Retail Segment reflects increased sales of 5.5 percent over the comparable prior year period due to a 2.8 percent comparable-store increase and the contribution of new stores. In addition, we experienced gross margin rate and selling, general and administrative expense rate improvements. In the Credit Card Segment, we achieved a significant increase in segment profit primarily due to declining bad debt expense driven by improved trends in key measures of risk.
Cash flow provided by operations was $1,158 million and $999 million for the three months ended May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively. During the three months ended May 1, 2010, we did not open any new stores or close any existing stores. During the three months ended May 2, 2009, we opened 27 new stores representing 16 stores net of 6 relocations and 5 closings.
Analysis of Results of Operations
Retail Segment
Retail Segment Results |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Percent |
|
||||
(millions) |
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
Change |
|
||
Sales |
|
$ |
15,158 |
|
$ |
14,361 |
|
5.5 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
10,412 |
|
9,936 |
|
4.8 |
|
||
Gross margin |
|
4,746 |
|
4,425 |
|
7.3 |
|
||
SG&A expenses (a) |
|
3,126 |
|
2,995 |
|
4.4 |
|
||
EBITDA |
|
1,620 |
|
1,430 |
|
13.3 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
512 |
|
468 |
|
9.4 |
|
||
EBIT |
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
$ |
962 |
|
15.2 |
% |
EBITDA is earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
EBIT is earnings before interest expense and income taxes.
(a) New account and loyalty rewards redeemed by our guests reduce reported sales. Our Retail Segment charges the cost of these discounts to our Credit Card Segment, and the reimbursements of $17 million for the three months ended May 1, 2010 and $20 million for the three months ended May 2, 2009 are recorded as a reduction to SG&A expenses within the Retail Segment.
Retail Segment Rate Analysis |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
Gross margin rate |
|
31.3% |
|
30.8% |
|
SG&A expense rate |
|
20.6% |
|
20.9% |
|
EBITDA margin rate |
|
10.7% |
|
10.0% |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense rate |
|
3.4% |
|
3.3% |
|
EBIT margin rate |
|
7.3% |
|
6.7% |
|
Retail Segment rate analysis metrics are computed by dividing the applicable amount by sales.
Sales
Sales include merchandise sales, net of expected returns, from our stores and our online business, as well as gift card breakage. Comparable-store sales is a measure that indicates the performance of our existing stores by measuring the growth in sales for such stores for a period over the comparable, prior-year period of equivalent length. The method of calculating comparable-store sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our comparable-store sales calculation is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Comparable-store sales are sales from our online business and sales from general merchandise and SuperTarget stores open longer than one year, including:
· sales from stores that have been remodeled or expanded while remaining open
· sales from stores that have been relocated to new buildings of the same format within the same trade area, in which the new store opens at about the same time as the old store closes
Comparable-store sales do not include:
· sales from general merchandise stores that have been converted, or relocated within the same trade area, to a SuperTarget store format
· sales from stores that were intentionally closed to be remodeled, expanded or reconstructed
Comparable-Store Sales |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
|
Comparable-store sales |
|
2.8% |
|
(3.7)% |
|
Drivers of changes in comparable-store sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of transactions |
|
2.2% |
|
(1.3)% |
|
Average transaction amount |
|
0.7% |
|
(2.4)% |
|
Units per transaction |
|
1.3% |
|
(3.2)% |
|
Selling price per unit |
|
(0.7)% |
|
0.8% |
|
The comparable-store sales increases or decreases above are calculated by comparing sales in fiscal year periods with comparable prior fiscal year periods of equivalent length.
Transaction-level metrics are influenced by a broad array of macroeconomic, competitive and consumer behavioral factors, and comparable-store sales rates are negatively affected by transfer of sales to new stores.
Gross Margin Rate
Gross margin rate represents gross margin (sales less cost of sales) as a percentage of sales. See Note 3 in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 for a description of costs included in cost of sales. Markup is the difference between an items cost and its retail price (expressed as a percentage of its retail price). Factors that affect markup include vendor offerings and negotiations, vendor income, sourcing strategies, market forces like raw material and freight costs, and competitive influences. Markdowns are the reduction in the original or previous price of retail merchandise. Factors that affect markdowns include inventory management, competitive influences and economic conditions.
For the three months ended May 1, 2010, our gross margin rate was 31.3 percent, compared with 30.8 percent in the same period last year. This increase was due to margin rate improvements within merchandise categories. Sales mix had little impact on gross margin rate as sales growth rates were similar for both lower margin rate categories (generally product categories of household essentials and food) and higher margin categories (generally product categories of apparel and home).
Selling, General and Administrative Expense Rate
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense rate represents SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales. See Note 3 in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 for a description of costs included in SG&A expenses. SG&A expenses exclude depreciation and amortization, as well as expenses associated with our credit card operations, which are reflected separately in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For the three months ended May 1, 2010, SG&A expense rate was 20.6 percent, compared with 20.9 percent for the same period last year primarily caused by continued productivity improvements in our stores, which contributed a 0.4 percentage point improvement in the expense rate.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense Rate
Our depreciation and amortization expense rate represents depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of sales. For the three months ended May 1, 2010, our depreciation and amortization expense rate was 3.4 percent compared with 3.3 percent for the same period last year. The increase was primarily due to the accelerated depreciation on assets that are being replaced as part of our 2010 remodel program.
Store Data
During the three months ended May 1, 2010, we did not open any new stores or close any existing stores. During the three months ended May 2, 2009, we opened 27 new stores, including 21 general merchandise stores (10 net of store closings) and 6 SuperTarget stores.
Number of Stores and Retail Square Feet |
|
Number of Stores |
|
Retail Square Feet(a) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
May 1, |
|
January 30, |
|
May 2, |
|
May 1, |
|
January 30, |
|
May 2, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Target general merchandise stores |
|
1,489 |
|
1,489 |
|
1,453 |
|
187,449 |
|
187,449 |
|
182,087 |
|
|
SuperTarget stores |
|
251 |
|
251 |
|
245 |
|
44,492 |
|
44,492 |
|
43,385 |
|
|
Total |
|
1,740 |
|
1,740 |
|
1,698 |
|
231,941 |
|
231,941 |
|
225,472 |
|
|
(a) |
In thousands; reflects total square feet, less office, distribution center and vacant space. |
|||||||||||||
Credit Card Segment
We offer credit to qualified guests through our REDcard products, the Target Visa and the Target Card. Our credit card program supports our core retail operations and remains an important contributor to our overall profitability and engagement with our guests. Effective April 29, 2010, all new qualified credit card applicants will receive the Target Card, and we will no longer issue the Target Visa to new credit card applicants. Existing Target Visa cardholders are not affected.
Credit card revenues are comprised of finance charges, late fees and other revenues, and third party merchant fees, or the amounts received from merchants who accept the Target Visa credit card.
Credit Card Segment Results |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Annualized |
|
Amount |
|
Annualized |
|
||||||
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Rate(d) |
|
(in millions) |
|
Rate(d) |
|
||||||
Finance charge revenue |
|
$ |
350 |
|
18.5 |
% |
$ |
355 |
|
16.3 |
% |
||||
Late fees and other revenue |
|
59 |
|
3.1 |
|
87 |
|
4.0 |
|
||||||
Third party merchant fees |
|
26 |
|
1.4 |
|
30 |
|
1.4 |
|
||||||
Total revenues |
|
435 |
|
23.0 |
|
472 |
|
21.7 |
|
||||||
Bad debt expense |
|
197 |
|
10.5 |
|
296 |
|
13.6 |
|
||||||
Operations and marketing expenses(a) |
|
100 |
|
5.3 |
|
107 |
|
4.9 |
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
4 |
|
0.2 |
|
4 |
|
0.2 |
|
||||||
Total expenses |
|
301 |
|
16.0 |
|
407 |
|
18.7 |
|
||||||
EBIT |
|
134 |
|
7.1 |
|
65 |
|
3.0 |
|
||||||
Interest expense on nonrecourse debt collateralized by credit card receivables |
|
23 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
||||||
Segment profit |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|||||
Average receivables funded by Target(b) |
|
$ |
2,361 |
|
|
$ |
3,200 |
|
|
|
|||||
Segment pretax ROIC(c) |
|
18.8 |
% |
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|||||||
(a) |
New account and loyalty rewards redeemed by our guests reduce reported sales. Our Retail Segment charges the cost of these discounts to our Credit Card Segment, and the reimbursements of $17 million for the three months ended May 1, 2010 and $20 million for the three months ended May 2, 2009, are recorded as an increase to operations and marketing expenses within the Credit Card Segment. |
(b) |
Amounts represent the portion of average gross credit card receivables funded by Target. These amounts exclude $5,186 million for the three months ended May 1, 2010 and $5,496 million for the three months ended May 2, 2009 of receivables funded by nonrecourse debt collateralized by credit card receivables. |
(c) |
ROIC is return on invested capital, and this rate equals our segment profit divided by average gross credit card receivables funded by Target, expressed as an annualized rate. |
(d) |
As an annualized percentage of average gross credit card receivables. |
Spread Analysis - Total Portfolio |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||||
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
|||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Annualized |
|
Amount |
|
Annualized |
|
|||
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Rate |
|
(in millions) |
|
Rate |
|
|||
EBIT |
|
$ |
134 |
|
7.1% |
(c) |
$ |
65 |
|
3.0% |
(c) |
|
LIBOR(a) |
|
|
|
0.2% |
|
|
|
0.5% |
|
|||
Spread to LIBOR(b) |
|
$ |
129 |
|
6.9% |
(c) |
$ |
54 |
|
2.5% |
(c) |
|
(a) |
Balance-weighted one-month LIBOR. |
|||||||||||
(b) |
Spread to LIBOR is a metric used to analyze the performance of our total credit card portfolio because the vast majority of our portfolio earned finance charge revenue at rates tied to the Prime Rate, and the interest rate on all nonrecourse debt securitized by credit card receivables is tied to LIBOR. |
|||||||||||
(c) |
As a percentage of average gross credit card receivables. |
|||||||||||
Our primary measure of segment profit in our Credit Card Segment is the EBIT generated by our total credit card receivables portfolio less the interest expense on nonrecourse debt collateralized by credit card receivables. We analyze this measure of profit in light of the amount of capital we have invested in our credit card receivables. In addition, we measure the performance of our overall credit card receivables portfolio by calculating the dollar Spread to LIBOR at the portfolio level. This metric approximates the overall financial performance of the entire credit card portfolio we manage by measuring the difference between EBIT earned on the portfolio and a hypothetical benchmark rate financing cost applied to the entire portfolio. The interest rate on all nonrecourse debt securitized by credit card receivables is tied to LIBOR. As a result of regulatory actions that affect our portfolio, effective January 2010, we implemented a terms change that converted the minimum APR for the majority of our accounts to a variable rate, and we eliminated penalty pricing for all current, or nondelinquent accounts.
Credit Card Segment profit for the three months ended May 1, 2010 increased to $111 million from $39 million for the three months ended May 2, 2009. Segment revenues were $435 million, a decrease of $38 million, or 7.9 percent, from the same period in the prior year, primarily driven by lower average receivables. Segment expenses were $301 million, a decrease of $107 million, or 26.2 percent, from prior year driven primarily by lower bad debt expense due to lower expected write-offs as well as a reduction in operations and marketing expenses. Segment interest expense declined by $3 million from last year, benefitting from a lower LIBOR rate compared with the prior year.
Receivables Rollforward Analysis |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||||
|
|
May 1, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
|||
(millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|||
Beginning gross credit card receivables |
|
$ |
7,982 |
|
|
$ |
9,094 |
|
|
|
Charges at Target |
|
719 |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|||
Charges at third parties |
|
1,426 |
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|||
Payments |
|
(2,989 |
) |
|
(3,261 |
) |
|
|||
Other |
|
122 |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|||
Period-end gross credit card receivables |
|
$ |
7,260 |
|
|
$ |
8,457 |
|
|
|
Average gross credit card receivables |
|
$ |
7,547 |
|
|
$ |
8,697 |
|
|
|
Accounts with three or more payments (60+ days) past due as a percentage of period-end gross credit card receivables |
|
5.3 |
% |
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|||
Accounts with four or more payments (90+ days) past due as a percentage of period-end gross credit card receivables |
|
3.8 |
% |
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|||
Credit card penetration(a) |
|
4.7 |
% |