UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

__________

 

FORM 10-QSB

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

 

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

 

For the transition period from ______ to ______

 

__________

 

Commission file number: 0-50765

 

VILLAGE BANK AND TRUST FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x Noo.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x  

 

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:

 

2,573,485 shares of common stock, $4.00 par value, outstanding as of July 23, 2007.

 

---

Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp.

Form 10-QSB

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

2

 

---

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

3

 

---

 

 

 

4

 

---

 

 

5

 

---

 

 

6

 

---

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

Note 1 - Principles of presentation

 

Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. (the “Company”) is the holding company of Village Bank (the “Bank”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank and the Bank’s three wholly-owned subsidiaries, Village Bank Mortgage Corporation, Village Insurance Agency, Inc., and Village Financial Services Corporation. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared on the accrual basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2007. The unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes to financial statements that are presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Note 2 - Use of estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheets and statements of income for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

 

Note 3 - Earnings per common share

 

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. For the three month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the weighted-average number of common shares totaled 2,565,692 and 2,071,159, respectively. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the weighted-average number of common shares totaled 2,563,900 and 1,971,239, respectively. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in the net income of the Company. Outstanding options and warrants to purchase common stock were considered in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the periods presented. For the three month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the weighted-average number of common shares on a fully diluted basis totaled 2,713,512 and 2,163,716, respectively. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the weighted-average number of common shares on a fully diluted basis totaled 2,701,743 and 2,066,713, respectively. There were no options to acquire common stock that were anti-dilutive for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

 

 

7

 

---

Note 4 – Stock warrant and incentive plans

 

On March 21, 2000, the Company approved the Organizational Investors Warrant Plan which made available 140,000 warrants for grant to the Company’s initial (organizational) investors for certain risks associated with the establishment of the Bank. The warrants have an exercise price of $10 per share (which approximated the fair value per share of common stock at issuance date) and expire in April 2008. At June 30, 2007, 140,000 warrants had been issued and none had been exercised.

 

Also on March 21, 2000, the Company established the Incentive Plan, a stock incentive plan, which authorizes the issuance of up to 455,000 shares of common stock (increased from 255,000 shares by amendment to the Incentive Plan approved by the Company’s shareholders at its 2006 annual meeting on May 23, 2006) to assist the Company in recruiting and retaining key personnel.

 

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company applied Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), in accounting for stock based compensation granted to employees and directors pursuant to the stock incentive plan. Under APB 25, compensation expense was determined based upon the fair value of the awards at the grant date consistent with the method under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), and the impact of this expense on net income and earnings per share was disclosed in the notes to financial statements. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” issued in December 2004, a revision of SFAS 123, and superseding APB 25, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123 (Revised 2004) requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award rather than disclosed in the financial statements.

 

The aggregate intrinsic value of the options outstanding was $1,003,000 and $737,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $1,815,000 and $713,000 at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

The following table summarizes stock options outstanding under the stock incentive plan at the indicated dates:

 

 

 

8

 

---

During the first quarter of 2007, we granted to certain officers 5,725 restricted shares of common stock and 5,725 performance shares of common stock with a weighted average fair market value of $15.95 at the date of grant. During the second quarter an additional 175 restricted shares of common stock and 175 performance shares of common stock were granted with a weighted average fair market value of $16.75 at the date of grant. These restricted stock awards have three-year graded vesting, and the performance shares cliff vest at the end of the three years. The number of performance shares that ultimately vest is dependent upon achieving specific performance targets. Prior to vesting, these shares are subject to forfeiture to us without consideration upon termination of employment under certain circumstances. The total number of shares underlying non-vested restricted stock and performance share awards was 11,200 at June 30, 2007.

 

Stock-based compensation expense was $30,446 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Unamortized stock-based compensation as of June 30, 2007 was $73,100 for stock options and $178,900 for restricted stock and performance shares.

 

Note 5 – Trust preferred securities

 

During the first quarter of 2005, Southern Community Financial Capital Trust I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable securities. On February 24, 2005, $5.2 million of Trust Preferred Capital Notes were issued through a pooled underwriting. The securities have a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest (three-month LIBOR plus 2.15%) which adjusts, and is payable, quarterly. The interest rate at June 30, 2007 was 7.50%. The securities may be redeemed at par beginning on March 15, 2010 and each quarter after such date until the securities mature on March 15, 2035. The principal asset of the Trust is $5.2 million of the Company’s junior subordinated debt securities with like maturities and like interest rates to the Trust Preferred Capital Notes.

 

The Trust Preferred Capital Notes may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy determination purposes up to 25% of Tier 1 capital after its inclusion. The portion of the Trust Preferred Capital Notes not considered as Tier 1 capital may be included in Tier 2 capital.

 

The obligations of the Company with respect to the issuance of the Trust Preferred Capital Notes constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trust’s obligations with respect to the Trust Preferred Capital Notes. Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, the Company may elect from time to time to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debt securities, which would result in a deferral of distribution payments on the related Trust Preferred Capital Notes and require a deferral of common dividends.

 

9

 

---

ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

Certain information contained in this discussion may include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by phrases such as “we expect,” “we believe” or words of similar import. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks including, but not limited to, the following factors:

 

 

Although we believe that our expectations with respect to the forward-looking statements are based upon reliable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business and operations, there can be no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements of the Company will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

 

General

 

The Company was organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia as a bank holding company whose activities consist of investment in its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank. The Bank is engaged in commercial and retail banking. We opened to the public on December 13, 1999. We place special emphasis on serving the financial needs of individuals, small and medium sized businesses, entrepreneurs, and professional concerns.

 

The Bank has three subsidiaries: Village Bank Mortgage Company, Village Insurance Agency, Inc., and Village Financial Services Corporation. Through our combined companies, we offer a wide range of banking and related financial services, including checking, savings, certificates of deposit and other depository services, and commercial, real estate and consumer loans. We are a community-oriented and locally owned and managed financial institution focusing on providing a high level of responsive and personalized services to our customers, delivered in the context of a strong direct relationship with the customer. We conduct our operations from our main office/corporate headquarters location and nine branch offices.

 

10

 

---

Net interest income is our primary source of earnings and represents the difference between interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The level of net interest income is affected primarily by variations in the volume and mix of those assets and liabilities, as well as changes in interest rates when compared to previous periods of operation. In addition, revenues are generated from fees charged on deposit accounts and gains from sale of mortgage loans to third-party investors.

 

Our total assets increased to $331,120,000 at June 30, 2007 from $291,218,000 at December 31, 2006, an increase of $39,902,000, or 13.7%. The increase in assets resulted primarily from increases in net loans of $47,276,000. The net increase in assets was funded by increases in deposits of $32,366,000 and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta of $8,000,000, and a decrease in liquid assets of $11,416,000.

 

The following presents management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition of the Company at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and results of operations for the Company for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as the second quarter 2007 financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

 

Results of operations

 

Net income totaled $178,000, or $0.07 per share on a fully diluted basis, in the second quarter of 2007 compared to net income of $341,000, or $0.16 per share on a fully diluted basis, in the second quarter of 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, net income totaled $537,000, or $0.20 per share on a fully diluted basis, compared to net income of $624,000, or $0.30 per share on a fully diluted basis, for the same period in 2006.This represents a decrease in net income of $163,000, or 48%, and $167,000, or 14%, for the three and six month periods, respectively.

 

The decline in earnings for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same periods in 2006 is a result of the growth in branches and loans of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Village Bank. The Bank also experienced several extraordinary expenses in June 2007 including a litigation settlement and the expenses associated with moving the retail operations from our headquarters to an independent location. This growth is demonstrated in the following schedule (dollars in thousands):

 

11

 

---

 

 

The Bank’s growth, which included the addition of two new branches since June 30, 2006, resulted in increases in noninterest expense of $517,000 when comparing the second quarter of 2006 to the second quarter of 2007, and $1,003,000 when comparing the first six months of 2006 to the first six months of 2007. For the second quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006, the largest increases in noninterest expense occurred in salaries and benefits of $277,000, occupancy costs of $61,000, equipment costs of $45,000 and data processing costs of $18,000. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006, the largest increases in noninterest expense occurred in salaries and benefits of $610,000, occupancy costs of $100,000, equipment costs of $102,000 and data processing costs of $65,000. The 2007 periods were also negatively affected by a litigation settlement in the amount of $82,000.

 

Coupled with additional expenses associated with the opening and staffing of the new branches, we had unexpected strong loan growth during the first six months of 2007 of $47 million, which resulted in the highest quarterly provision for loan losses in the Bank’s history. The amount of the provision for loan losses is determined by many factors, but is primarily determined by the amount of loans outstanding. The provisions for loan losses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 amounted to $360,000 and $568,000, respectively, which was $214,000 and $205,000, respectively, higher than the provisions for the same periods in 2006.

 

Net interest income

 

Net interest income is our primary source of earnings and represents the difference between interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The level of net interest income is affected primarily by variations in the volume and mix of those assets and liabilities, as well as changes in interest rates when compared to previous periods of operation.

 

Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $5,677,000 and $4,738,000, respectively. This increase of $939,000, or 20%, in net interest income was due to growth in loans, offset by a decline in the net interest margin. Loans net of deferred fees increased by $85,006,000, or 42%, from $203,799,000 at June 30, 2006 to $288,805,000 at June 30, 2007. Loans net of deferred fees averaged $262,562,000 for the first six months of 2007 as compared to $189,471,000 for the first six months of 2006, an increase of $73,091,000, or 39%. However, our net interest margin (net interest income expressed as a percentage of

 

12

 

---

average earning assets) for the six months ended June 30, 2007 declined to 4.00% from 4.65% for the same period in 2006. The declining net interest margin is a result of increasing cost of funds as rates on liabilities reprice upwards. While we believe that our net interest margin will not decline significantly during the remainder of 2007 as interest rates have stabilized, we can provide no assurance that it will not.

 

Average interest-earning assets for the first six months of 2007 increased by $80,552,000, or 39%, compared to the first six months of 2006. The increase in interest-earning assets was due primarily to the growth of our loan portfolio. The average yield on interest-earning assets increased to 8.35% for the first six months of 2007 compared to 8.18% for the first six months of 2006. The increase in the average yields from 2006 to 2007 was due primarily to an improvement in the yield on loans.

 

Our average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $75,746,000, or 41%, for the first six months of 2007 compared to the first six months of 2006. The growth in interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to growth in deposits. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased to 4.79% for the first six months of 2007 from 3.95% for the first six months of 2006. The principal reason for the increase in liability costs was increasing interest rates as liabilities reprice. The increasing interest rates were a result of increases in short term interest rates by the Federal Reserve. See our discussion of interest rate sensitivity below for more information.

 

The following table illustrates average balances of total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated, showing the average distribution of assets, liabilities, shareholders' equity and related income, expense and corresponding weighted-average yields and rates. The average balances used in these tables and other statistical data were calculated using daily average balances. We had no tax exempt assets for the periods presented.

 

13

 

---

 

Provision for loan losses

 

The provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was $360,000 compared to $146,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $568,000 compared to $363,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The 56% increase when comparing the six month periods was primarily due to the higher loan volume in 2007 compared to 2006. Net loans increased by $47,754,000

 

14

 

---

during the first six months of 2007 compared to an increase of $31,420,000 during the first six months of 2006. The amount of the loan loss provision is determined by an evaluation of the level of loans outstanding, the level of non-performing loans, historical loan loss experience, delinquency trends, the amount of actual losses charged to the reserve in a given period and assessment of present and anticipated economic conditions. See our discussion of the allowance for loan losses under Allowance for loan losses and Critical accounting policies below.

 

Noninterest income

 

Noninterest income increased from $635,000 for the first three months of 2006 to $685,000 for the first three months of 2007. Noninterest income also increased from $1,213,000 for the first six months of 2006 to $1,350,000 for the first six months of 2007, a $137,000, or 11%, increase. This increase was attributable to an increase in loan originations in the mortgage company and increased service charges and fees resulting from a larger deposit base. Gains on loan sales increased from $758,000 for the first six months of 2006 to $773,000 for the first six months of 2007, a $14,000, or 2% increase. Service charges and fees increased by $94,000, or 36%, from $263,000 for the first six months of 2006 to $357,000 for the first six months of 2007.

 

Noninterest expense

 

Noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was $3,006,000 compared to $2,489,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $517,000 or 21%. Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 totaled $5,645,000, an increase of $1,002,000, or 22%, from $4,642,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Salaries and benefits represented the largest increase in both periods, increasing by $277,000 or 19% from $1,440,000 for the first three months of 2006 to $1,717,000 for the first three months of 2007 and increasing by $610,000, or 23%, from $2,673,000 for the first six months of 2006 to $3,283,000 for the first six months of 2007. This increase and other increases in noninterest expense were primarily attributable to the growth of the Company both in personnel and in new branches. Occupancy and equipment expenses increased by $202,000, or 38%, when comparing the six month periods.

 

Income taxes

 

The provision for income taxes of $277,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 is based upon the results of operations. Certain items of income and expense are reported in different periods for financial reporting and tax return purposes. The tax effects of these temporary differences are recognized currently in the deferred income tax provision or benefit. Deferred tax assets or liabilities are computed based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the applicable enacted marginal tax rate.

 

The Company must also evaluate the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. If any such assets are not likely to be recovered, a valuation allowance must be recognized. We determined that a valuation allowance was not required for deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2007. The assessment of the carrying value of deferred tax assets is based on certain assumptions, changes in which could have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

Commercial banking organizations conducting business in Virginia are not subject to Virginia income taxes. Instead, they are subject to a franchise tax based on bank capital. The Company recorded a franchise tax expense of $105,000 and $60,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

15

 

---

Loan portfolio

 

The following table presents the composition of our loan portfolio (excluding mortgage loans held for sale) at the dates indicated.

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2007 was $3,030,000, compared to $2,553,000 at December 31, 2006. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to gross portfolio loans (net of unearned income and excluding mortgage loans held for sale) at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was 1.05% and 1.06%, respectively. The amount of the loan loss provision is determined by an evaluation of the level of loans outstanding, the level of non-performing loans, historical loan loss experience, delinquency trends, the amount of actual losses charged to the reserve in a given period and assessment of present and anticipated economic conditions. See our discussion of the allowance for loan losses under Critical accounting policies below.

 

16

 

---

The following table presents an analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.

 

 

 

 

17

 

---

Investment portfolio

 

At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, all of our securities were classified as available-for-sale. The following table presents the composition of our investment portfolio at the dates indicated.

 

 

 

 

18

 

---

Goodwill

 

Goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired, is evaluated at least annually for impairment by comparing its fair value with its recorded amount and is written down when appropriate. Projected net operating cash flows are compared to the carrying amount of the goodwill recorded and, if the estimated net operating cash flows are less than the carrying amount, a loss is recognized to reduce the carrying amount to fair value.

 

Goodwill of $689,000 at June 30, 2007 was related to the Bank’s acquisition of Village Bank Mortgage in 2003. There was no impairment of goodwill at June 30, 2007.

 

Deposits

 

Total deposits increased by $32,366,000, or 13%, during the first six months of 2007 as compared to an increase of $14,825,000, or 8%, during the first six months of 2006. The increase in deposits in 2007 resulted primarily from an increase in certificates of deposit of $27,405,000. The increase in certificates of deposit was due primarily to efforts to increase liquidity to fund the large increase in loans discussed previously.

 

The mix of our deposits continues to be weighted toward time deposits, which represent 79% of our total deposits at each of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. As our branch network increases and becomes more convenient to a larger segment of our targeted customer base, we believe that a move to a higher percentage of our deposits in checking accounts will occur. Additionally, we are emphasizing checking account deposit growth at our existing branches by providing incentives to branch personnel for reaching new checking account growth goals.

 

The average cost of interest-bearing deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was 4.76% and 3.85%, respectively. This increase in our average cost of interest-bearing deposits has mirrored the overall increase in interest rates resulting from the actions by the Federal Reserve to increase short-term interest rates during 2005 and 2006. We expect our cost of deposits to stabilize now that the Federal Reserve has stopped increasing short-term interest rates.

 

The variety of deposit accounts that we offer has allowed us to be competitive in obtaining funds and has allowed us to respond with flexibility to, although not to eliminate, the threat of disintermediation (the flow of funds away from depository institutions such as banking institutions into direct investment vehicles such as government and corporate securities). Our ability to attract and retain deposits, and our cost of funds, has been, and is expected to continue to be, significantly affected by money market conditions.

 

Borrowings

 

We use borrowings to supplement deposits when they are available at a lower overall cost to us or they can be invested at a positive rate of return.

 

As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”), the Bank is required to own capital stock in the FHLB and is authorized to apply for borrowings from the FHLB. Each FHLB credit program has its own interest rate, which may be fixed or variable, and range of maturities. The FHLB may prescribe the acceptable uses to which the advances may be put, as well as on the size of the advances and repayment provisions. Borrowings from the FHLB were $12,000,000 and $4,000,000 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The

 

19

 

---

FHLB advances are secured by the pledge of first mortgage loans and the pledge of our FHLB stock.

 

Capital resources

 

Stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2007 was $26,250,000, compared to $25,644,000 at December 31, 2006. The $606,000 increase in equity during the first six months of 2007 was primarily due to net income of $537,000. Stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2006 was $24,950,000 compared to $17,152,000 at December 31, 2005. The $7,798,000 increase in equity during the first six months of 2006 was due to proceeds from the issuance of common stock in stock options and warrants exercises of $7,204,000 and net income of $624,000.

 

During the first quarter of 2005, the Company issued $5.2 million in Trust Preferred Capital Notes. The Trust Preferred Capital Notes may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy determination purposes up to 25% of Tier 1 capital after its inclusion.

 

20

 

---

The following table presents the composition of regulatory capital and the capital ratios at the dates indicated.

 

 

 

Liquidity

 

Liquidity provides us with the ability to meet normal deposit withdrawals, while also providing for the credit needs of customers. We are committed to maintaining liquidity at a level sufficient to protect depositors, provide for reasonable growth, and fully comply with all regulatory requirements.

 

At June 30, 2007, cash, cash equivalents and investment securities available for sale totaled $18,889,000, or 6% of total assets, which we believe is adequate to meet short-term liquidity needs.

 

At June 30, 2007, we had commitments to originate $104,189,000 of loans. Fixed commitments to incur capital expenditures were $12,000,000 at June 30, 2007 and relate to the construction of a new headquarters building in Chesterfield County. Time deposits scheduled to mature in the 12-month period ending June 30, 2008 totaled $131,566,000 at June 30, 2007. Based on past experience, we believe that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us. We further believe that loan repayments and other sources of funds such as deposit growth will be adequate to meet our foreseeable short- and long-term liquidity needs.

 

21

 

---

Interest rate sensitivity

 

An important element of asset/liability management is the monitoring of our sensitivity to interest rate movements. In order to measure the effects of interest rates on our net interest income, management takes into consideration the expected cash flows from the securities and loan portfolios and the expected magnitude of the repricing of specific asset and liability categories. We evaluate interest sensitivity risk and then formulate guidelines to manage this risk based on management’s outlook regarding the economy, forecasted interest rate movements and other business factors. Our goal is to maximize and stabilize the net interest margin by limiting exposure to interest rate changes.

 

Contractual principal repayments of loans do not necessarily reflect the actual term of our loan portfolio. The average lives of mortgage loans are substantially less than their contractual terms because of loan prepayments and because of enforcement of due-on-sale clauses, which gives us the right to declare a loan immediately due and payable in the event, among other things, the borrower sells the real property subject to the mortgage and the loan is not repaid. In addition, certain borrowers increase their equity in the security property by making payments in excess of those required under the terms of the mortgage.

 

The sale of fixed rate loans is intended to protect us from precipitous changes in the general level of interest rates. The valuation of adjustable rate mortgage loans is not as directly dependent on the level of interest rates as is the value of fixed rate loans. As with other investments, we regularly monitor the appropriateness of the level of adjustable rate mortgage loans in our portfolio and may decide from time to time to sell such loans and reinvest the proceeds in other adjustable rate investments.

 

The data in the following table reflects repricing or expected maturities of various assets and liabilities at June 30, 2007. The gap analysis represents the difference between interest-sensitive assets and liabilities in a specific time interval. Interest sensitivity gap analysis presents a position that existed at one particular point in time, and assumes that assets and liabilities with similar repricing characteristics will reprice at the same time and to the same degree.

 

22

 

---

 

 

At June 30, 2007, our assets that reprice within one year exceeded liabilities that reprice within one year by $28,650,000 and therefore we were in an asset positive position. An asset positive position, or positive gap, can adversely affect earnings in periods of falling interest rates, but can improve earnings in periods of rising interest rates. This positive position is due primarily to our adjustable rate loan portfolio.

 

23

 

---

Critical accounting policies

 

The financial condition and results of operations presented in the financial statements, accompanying notes to the financial statements and management's discussion and analysis are, to a large degree, dependent upon our accounting policies. The selection and application of these accounting policies involve judgments, estimates, and uncertainties that are susceptible to change.

 

Presented below is a discussion of those accounting policies that management believes are the most important accounting policies to the portrayal and understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. These critical accounting policies require management's most difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. In the event that different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, and depending upon the severity of such changes, the possibility of materially different financial condition or results of operations is a reasonable likelihood. See also Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

We monitor and maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb an estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We maintain policies and procedures that address the systems of controls over the following areas of maintenance of the allowance: the systematic methodology used to determine the appropriate level of the allowance to provide assurance they are maintained in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; the accounting policies for loan charge-offs and recoveries; the assessment and measurement of impairment in the loan portfolio; and the loan grading system.

 

We evaluate various loans individually for impairment as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, and SFAS 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan - Income Recognition and Disclosures. Loans evaluated individually for impairment include non-performing loans, such as loans on non-accrual, loans past due by 90 days or more, restructured loans and other loans selected by management. The evaluations are based upon discounted expected cash flows or collateral valuations. If the evaluation shows that a loan is individually impaired, then a specific reserve is established for the amount of impairment. If a loan evaluated individually is not impaired, then the loan is assessed for impairment under SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies, with a group of loans that have similar characteristics.

 

For loans without individual measures of impairment, we make estimates of losses for groups of loans as required by SFAS 5. Loans are grouped by similar characteristics, including the type of loan, the assigned loan classification and the general collateral type. A loss rate reflecting the expected loss inherent in a group of loans is derived based upon estimates of default rates for a given loan grade, the predominant collateral type for the group and the terms of the loan. The resulting estimate of losses for groups of loans is adjusted for relevant environmental factors and other conditions of the portfolio of loans and leases, including: borrower and industry concentrations; levels and trends in delinquencies, charge-offs and recoveries; changes in underwriting standards and risk selection; level of experience, ability and depth of lending management; and national and local economic conditions.

 

The amounts of estimated impairment for individually evaluated loans and groups of loans are added together for a total estimate of loan losses. This estimate of losses is compared to our allowance for loan losses as of the evaluation date and, if the estimate of losses is greater than the allowance, an additional provision to the allowance would be made. If the estimate of losses is less than the allowance, the degree to which the allowance exceeds the estimate is evaluated

 

24

 

---

to determine whether the allowance falls outside a range of estimates. If the estimate of losses is below the range of reasonable estimates, the allowance would be reduced by way of a credit to the provision for loan losses. We recognize the inherent imprecision in estimates of losses due to various uncertainties and variability related to the factors used, and therefore a reasonable range around the estimate of losses is derived and used to ascertain whether the allowance is too high. If different assumptions or conditions were to prevail and it is determined that the allowance is not adequate to absorb the new estimate of probable losses, an additional provision for loan losses would be made, which amount may be material to the financial statements.

 

Impact of inflation and changing prices and seasonality

 

The financial statements in this document have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without consideration of changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.

 

Unlike industrial companies, most of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the price of goods and services, since such prices are affected by inflation.

 

25

 

---

ITEM 3 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Based upon an evaluation as of June 30, 2007 under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are effective in ensuring that all material information required to be disclosed in reports that it files or submits under such Act are made known to them in a timely fashion.

 

Our management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of it that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

26

 

---

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

 

 

ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

 

 

ITEM 3 – DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

 

 

 

ITEM 4 – SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

The Company held its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. at the Salisbury Country Club, 13620 Salisbury Road, Midlothian, Virginia.

 

There were 2,033,116 shares represented in person or by proxy, which represented 79.2% of the outstanding shares. There was a quorum for all purposes.

 

The shareholders were asked to vote on the election of three directors of the Company for a term of three years each and to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for 2007.

 

The votes cast for or withheld for the election of directors were as follows:

 

 

The votes cast for, against or abstain to ratify the appointment of BDO Seidman, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for 2007 were as follows:

 

 

There were no broker non-votes in connection with the ratification of the appointment of BDO Seidman, LLP.

 

27

 

---

ITEM 5 – OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

ITEM 6 – EXHIBITS

 

 

 

 

 

28

 

---

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

VILLAGE BANK AND TRUST FINANCIAL CORP.

(Registrant)

 

 

Thomas W. Winfree

President and

Chief Executive Officer

 

C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

29

 

---

Exhibit Index

 

Exhibit