e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                     to                    
Commission File number 1-9487
ATLANTIS PLASTICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
DELAWARE   06-1088270
     
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (IRS Employer Identification No.)
     
1870 The Exchange, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia   30339
     
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including Area Code) (800) 497-7659
     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer þ
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. Yes o No þ
     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date.
     
Class   Outstanding at October 31, 2006
     
Class A Common Stock, $.0001 par value   6,113,997
Class B Common Stock, $.0001 par value   2,141,826
 
 

 


 

ATLANTIS PLASTICS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2006
INDEX
         
    Page
Part I. Financial Information
       
 
       
Item 1. Financial Statements
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    15  
 
       
    21  
 
       
    21  
 
       
       
 
       
    22  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    23  
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2

2


Table of Contents

ATLANTIS PLASTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
(In thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited)   2006   2005   2006   2005
 
Net sales
  $ 108,261     $ 106,585     $ 328,648     $ 308,591  
 
                               
Cost of sales
    97,120       90,259       289,646       261,635  
 
Gross profit
    11,141       16,326       39,002       46,956  
 
                               
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    8,171       8,968       25,022       26,117  
Severance expense
    655               952          
Costs of unconsummated financing
                      555  
 
Operating income
    2,315       7,358       13,028       20,284  
 
                               
Unamortized deferred financing cost write-off
                      (3,794 )
Net interest expense
    (5,083 )     (4,481 )     (14,655 )     (10,341 )
Other (expense) income
    (17 )     85       96       26  
 
(Loss) income before (benefit) provision for income taxes
    (2,785 )     2,962       (1,531 )     6,175  
 
                               
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
    (1,031 )     1,016       (567 )     2,116  
 
 
                               
Net (loss) income
  $ (1,754 )   $ 1,946     $ (964 )   $ 4,059  
 
 
                               
Basic (loss) earnings per share
  $ (0.21 )   $ 0.24     $ (0.12 )   $ 0.50  
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
  $ (0.21 )   $ 0.24     $ (0.12 )   $ 0.50  
 
 
                               
Weighted average number of shares used in computing (loss) earnings per share:
                               
Basic
    8,256       8,256       8,256       8,147  
Diluted
    8,256       8,256       8,256       8,147  
 
 
                               
Cash dividends paid per common share
  $     $     $     $ 12.50  
 
See accompanying notes.

3


Table of Contents

ATLANTIS PLASTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                 
    September 30,   December 31,
(In thousands, except share and per share data)   2006 (1)   2005
 
ASSETS
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 47     $ 178  
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $1,944 and $1,835, respectively)
    57,750       57,075  
Inventories, net
    41,824       41,667  
Other current assets
    8,127       7,513  
Deferred income tax assets
    3,981       3,694  
 
Total current assets
    111,729       110,127  
 
               
Property and equipment, net
    68,195       69,208  
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization
    51,351       51,351  
Other assets
    6,703       8,226  
 
Total assets
  $ 237,978     $ 238,912  
 
 
               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
               
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  $ 37,095     $ 47,944  
Current maturities of long-term debt, including long-term debt classified as current of $129,900 as of September 30, 2006
    131,632       1,970  
Other current liabilities
    356       356  
 
Total current liabilities
    169,083       50,270  
 
               
Long-term debt
    77,550       197,195  
Deferred income tax liabilities
    10,877       10,628  
Other liabilities
    1,174       702  
 
Total liabilities
    258,684       258,795  
 
               
Commitments and contingencies
           
 
               
Shareholders’ deficit:
               
Class A Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 6,113,158 shares issued and outstanding in 2006 and 2005
    1       1  
Class B Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, 7,000,000 shares authorized, 2,142,665 shares issued and outstanding in 2006 and 2005
           
Additional paid-in capital
    284        
Accumulated other comprehensive income (net of income taxes of $768 and $862, respectively)
    1,509       1,652  
Accumulated deficit
    (22,500 )     (21,536 )
 
Total shareholders’ deficit
    (20,706 )     (19,883 )
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit
  $ 237,978     $ 238,912  
 
(1)   Unaudited
See accompanying notes.

4


Table of Contents

ATLANTIS PLASTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                 
    Nine Months Ended
    September 30,
(In thousands) (Unaudited)   2006   2005
 
Operating Activities:
               
Net (loss) income
  $ (964 )   $ 4,059  
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used for operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    9,205       8,744  
Loan fee, other amortization and unamortized financing cost write-off
    698       4,441  
Amortization of gain realized on swap redemption
    (650 )      
Share-based compensation expense
    284       461  
Unconsummated financing cost write-off
          555  
Interest receivable from shareholder loans
          (5 )
Gain on disposal of assets
          (8 )
Deferred income taxes
    57       163  
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable, net
    (675 )     (10,558 )
Inventories, net
    (157 )     (2,945 )
Other current assets
    (614 )     (2,653 )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (10,849 )     (6,130 )
Other assets and liabilities
    (1,566 )     106  
 
Net cash used for operating activities
    (5,231 )     (3,770 )
 
 
               
Investing Activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (8,194 )     (12,201 )
Proceeds from asset dispositions
          38  
 
Net cash used for investing activities
    (8,194 )     (12,163 )
 
 
               
Financing Activities:
               
Net repayments under old revolving credit facility
          (17,160 )
Net borrowings under new revolving credit facility
    11,600       12,900  
Borrowings from term loans under new credit agreement
          195,000  
Repayments under old term loans
          (70,587 )
Repayments under new term loans
    (1,200 )     (600 )
Financing costs associated with new credit agreement
    (140 )     (6,680 )
Repayments on bonds
    (383 )      
Proceeds from swap redemption
    3,417        
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
          2,522  
Income tax benefit from employee stock options
          3,718  
Payment of special dividend
          (103,198 )
Repayments on notes receivable from shareholders
          457  
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
    13,294       16,372  
 
 
               
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (131 )     439  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    178       51  
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 47     $ 490  
 
 
               
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:
               
Non-cash increase (decrease) of accounts receivable and accounts payable in connection with supplier agreements
  $ 908     $ (338 )
See accompanying notes.

5


Table of Contents

ATLANTIS PLASTICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2006.
     The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.
     The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis and consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Atlantis Plastics, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
     Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform with the current year presentation.
Note 2. Inventories
     Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Market is established based on the lower of replacement cost or estimated net realizable value, with consideration given to deterioration, obsolescence, and other factors. Cost includes materials, direct and indirect labor, and factory overhead and is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
     The components of inventory consist of the following at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
                 
    September 30,   December 31,
(In thousands)   2006   2005
 
Raw Materials
  $ 20,371     $ 23,747  
Work in Process
    439       421  
Finished Products
    21,014       17,499  
     
Inventories, net
  $ 41,824     $ 41,667  
     

6


Table of Contents

Note 3. (Loss) Earnings Per Share Data
     The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share for the periods indicated:
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,  
(In thousands, except per share data)   2006     2005     2006     2005  
Net (loss) income
  $ (1,754 )   $ 1,946     $ (964 )   $ 4,059  
 
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic
    8,256       8,256       8,256       8,147  
Net effect of dilutive stock options – based on treasury stock method
                       
 
                       
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted
    8,256       8,256       8,256       8,147  
 
                               
(Loss) earnings per share – basic
  $ (0.21 )   $ 0.24     $ (0.12 )   $ 0.50  
 
                               
(Loss) earnings per share – diluted
  $ (0.21 )   $ 0.24     $ (0.12 )   $ 0.50  
Note 4. Comprehensive (Loss) Income
     Total comprehensive (loss) income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,  
(In thousands)   2006     2005     2006     2005  
Net (loss) income as reported
  $ (1,754 )   $ 1,946     $ (964 )   $ 4,059  
 
                               
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives, net of income taxes
    (910 )     1,103       (143 )     1,316  
 
                       
Total comprehensive (loss) income
  $ (2,664 )   $ 3,049     $ (1,107 )   $ 5,375  

7


Table of Contents

Note 5. Debt
     Long-term debt consisted of the following balances at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
                 
    September 30,   December 31,
(In thousands)   2006   2005
 
Senior secured term loans
  $ 118,200     $ 119,400  
Junior secured term loans
    75,000       75,000  
Revolving line of credit
    12,900       1,300  
Bonds
    3,082       3,465  
     
Total debt
    209,182       199,165  
Less current maturities
    (1,732 )     (1,970 )
Less long-term debt classified as current
    (129,900 )      
     
Long-term debt
  $ 77,550     $ 197,195  
     On March 22, 2005, the Company entered into a new $220 million secured credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) provided by a syndicate of financial institutions, replacing its previously existing $120 million credit facility (the “Retired Credit Facility”). The new financing included a $25 million revolving credit facility maturing March 2011 priced, at the Company’s discretion, at either the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a spread of 2.75% or the prime interest rate plus a spread of 0.75%, a $120 million senior secured term loan (the “Senior Term Loan”) priced at LIBOR plus a spread of 2.75% maturing September 2011 and a $75 million junior secured term loan (the “Junior Term Loan”) priced at LIBOR plus a spread of 7.25% maturing in March 2012. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement were used to repay the Company’s then existing senior secured debt of $83.9 million outstanding on March 22, 2005 and to pay related fees and expenses. The remainder of the proceeds was used on April 8, 2005 to pay a special one-time dividend of $103.2 million ($12.50 per share) to the Company’s shareholders and to pay approximately $4.4 million to holders of outstanding stock options in exchange for the cancellation of those options. In conjunction with the pay-off of the Company’s Retired Credit Facility in the first quarter of 2005, the Company wrote-off approximately $3.8 million of deferred financing costs related to the Retired Credit Facility. Additionally in 2005, the Company expensed approximately $0.6 million of costs associated with a financing effort that was not consummated.
     On June 6, 2005, the Company entered into an interest rate swap contract with a notional amount of $125 million to effectively fix the interest rate on a portion of its floating rate debt. This contract had the effect of converting a portion of the Company’s floating rate debt to a fixed 30-day LIBOR of 3.865%, plus the applicable spread. The interest rate swap was to expire on June 6, 2008. On May 16, 2006, the Company terminated this swap realizing $3.4 million upon termination, and concurrently entered into a new swap that also terminates on June 6, 2008. The $3.4 million is being amortized monthly as an offset to interest expense over the life of the original swap. Cash flows from the termination of this interest rate swap are classified as financing activities, the same category as the cash flows from the items being hedged. The new contract, which has substantially identical terms as the terminated contract, has the effect of converting a portion of the Company’s floating rate debt to a fixed 30-day LIBOR of 5.265%, plus the applicable spread. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreement is the estimated amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreement at the reporting date, taking into account the current interest rate environment and the remaining term of the interest rate swap agreement. The fair value of the interest rate swap outstanding at September 30, 2006 was a long-term liability of approximately $0.5 million, and the change in fair value was recorded as part of other comprehensive income, net of income taxes (see also Note 4, Comprehensive Income (Loss); Note 7, Capital Structure; and Note 8, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities).

8


Table of Contents

      In October 2006, the Company amended its senior secured term loan and revolving credit facility agreement to waive September 30, 2006 financial covenants, impose monthly minimum EBITDA requirements for October 2006 and November 2006, increase applicable borrowing spreads beginning November 1, 2006, and require us to maintain availability under our credit facilities of at least $3.0 million. The amendment allows the Company to prepay its junior credit facility subject to certain provisions. In addition, the amendment requires the Company to retain a financial advisor to examine its financial forecast and its performance relative to its peers. The Company is currently negotiating with the senior secured lenders to amend certain financial covenants through the remainder of the loan term. While the Company believes it will be successful in negotiating acceptable financial covenants, it can make no such guarantee. Without an amendment to the covenants, the Company’s projections indicate that it would not be able to comply with the current covenants for the remainder of 2006 and throughout 2007. Failure to comply with covenants contained in the Company’s senior secured credit agreement, if not waived or amended, would result in a default under the agreement. Under an event of default, the lender may, (a) reduce the aggregate amount of the obligations, (b) declare all or any portion of the obligations immediately due and payable, or (c) terminate future advances. Any default under the Company’s senior secured credit agreement, particularly any default that results in acceleration of indebtedness or foreclosure on collateral, would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company classified all of its senior secured debt as a current liability as of September 30, 2006 as a result of the potential for the acceleration of the loans outstanding under the senior secured term loan in the event that the Company is unable to obtain an amendment to the current covenants.
      In October 2006, the Company amended its junior secured term loan agreement to waive September 30, 2006 financial covenants, increase the applicable borrowing spread from 7.25% to 9.00%, amend certain covenant ratios, restrict certain of our expenditures subject to maintaining certain financial ratios, and pay a fee. The Company is in full compliance with this loan agreement, and its projections indicate that it is probable the Company will remain in compliance for the remainder of 2006 and throughout 2007. Accordingly, the Company has classified this obligation as a long-term liability.

9


Table of Contents

Note 6. Stock-based Compensation
     Prior to January 1, 2005, the Company accounted for its stock-based employee compensation plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). No stock-based employee compensation cost was recognized in the consolidated income statements as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
     Effective January 1, 2005, the Company elected to early adopt the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which requires all share-based payments, including stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values and no longer allows pro forma disclosure as an alternative. The Company adopted this statement based on the “modified prospective” method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R that remain unvested on the effective date. The Company recognized stock-based expense of $53,000 during the first six months of 2005, prior to the Company’s agreement to cancel all outstanding stock options (discussed below), which resulted in expensing the remaining unrecognized compensation of $408,000. For the first nine months of 2006, the Company recognized share-based expense of $284,000 in connection with the granting of stock options as discussed below.
     On January 31, 2005, the Company agreed to cancel certain outstanding stock options of Anthony F. Bova, its then President and Chief Executive Officer, which would have otherwise expired on that date. In exchange for the cancellation of his 350,000 stock options, Mr. Bova received a cash payment of approximately $2.4 million on April 8, 2005. The purpose of this option cancellation agreement was to provide Mr. Bova with a payment similar to the one-time dividend he would otherwise have received on that date on the shares issuable upon the exercise of the options cancelled.
     On March 11, 2005, the Company agreed to cancel the outstanding stock options of its management, officers and directors (the “Participants”) in exchange for cash payments, on April 8, 2005, of approximately $2.0 million in aggregate in anticipation of the one-time dividend payment. The purpose of the option cancellation agreements was to provide each Participant with a payment similar to the dividend he or she would otherwise have received on the shares issuable upon the exercise of the options cancelled. Accordingly, the Company cancelled an aggregate of 228,800 outstanding stock options previously granted to the Participants. Upon the cancellation of those options, the Company recorded previously unrecognized compensation expense of $408,000 during the first six months of fiscal 2005.
     On March 15, 2005, the shareholders of the Company approved the amendment and restatement of its 2001 Stock Award Plan. The amended and restated Plan increased the number of shares available for grant from 500,000 to 865,000 and allows the granting of share-based awards other than stock options, such as stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock units, bonus stock, dividend equivalents, other stock-related awards and performance awards that may be settled in cash, stock, or other property.
     In the first quarter of 2006, the Company granted stock options to certain key employees and directors. As of September 30, 2006, there was approximately $1.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the stock option plans. The Company expects to amortize this cost over a remaining weighted average period of 4.6 years. The cost does not include the impact of any future share-based compensation awards.

10


Table of Contents

Note 7. Capital Structure
     The Company’s capital stock consists of Class A Common Stock, with holders entitled to one vote per share, and Class B Common Stock, with holders entitled to 10 votes per share. Holders of the Class B Common Stock are entitled to elect 75% of the Board of Directors; holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to elect the remaining 25%. Each share of Class B Common Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, into one share of Class A Common Stock. Class A Common Stock is not convertible into shares of any other equity security. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, zero shares and 84,392 shares, respectively, of Class B Common Stock were converted into Class A Common Stock.
     In March 2005, the shareholders of the Company approved a proposal to change the Company’s state of incorporation from Florida to Delaware. Upon completion of this reincorporation, the par value of the Company’s Class A and Class B Common Stock decreased to $0.0001 per Common Share from $0.10 per Common Share.
     On March 22, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a special, one-time cash dividend of $12.50 per common share, payable April 8, 2005, to shareholders of record as of April 1, 2005. This dividend aggregated approximately $103.2 million and was funded by proceeds from the Company’s new financing arrangement.
     The following table summarizes changes in Shareholders’ Deficit during the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
                                                 
                                    Accumulated    
                                    Other    
    Class A   Class B   Additional           Compre-   Total
    Common   Common   Paid-In   Accumulated   hensive   Shareholders’
(In thousands)   Stock   Stock   Capital   Deficit   Income   Deficit
 
Balance at January 1, 2006
  $ 1     $     $     $ (21,536 )   $ 1,652     $ (19,883 )
 
                                               
Net (loss)
                      (964 )           (964 )
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of income tax benefit of $73
                            (143 )     (143 )
Share-based compensation
                284                   284  
     
 
                                               
Balance at September 30, 2006
  $ 1     $     $ 284     $ (22,500 )   $ 1,509     $ (20,706 )
 

11


Table of Contents

Note 8. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
     All derivatives are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. On the date the derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as either (1) a fair value hedge of a recognized liability, (2) a cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction, (3) the hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, or (4) a non-designated derivative instrument. The Company has entered into an interest rate swap agreement that is classified as a cash flow hedge. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are classified as a cash flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income until reclassified into earnings at the time of settlement of the hedged transaction.
     The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items as well as the risk management objectives and strategy. The Company formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged items. The Company does not utilize derivatives for speculative purposes.

12


Table of Contents

Note 9. Segment Information
     The Company has three operating segments: Plastic Films, Injection Molding, and Profile Extrusion. Information related to such segments is as follows:
                                         
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
    Plastic   Injection   Profile        
(In thousands)   Films   Molding   Extrusion   Corporate   Consolidated
 
Net sales
  $ 207,891     $ 94,000     $ 26,757     $     $ 328,648  
Operating income (loss)
    8,135       5,389       (496 )           13,028  
Capital expenditures
    4,268       2,086       1,498       342       8,194  
Depreciation
    3,953       3,472       895       885       9,205  
                                         
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
    Plastic   Injection   Profile        
(In thousands)   Films   Molding   Extrusion   Corporate   Consolidated
 
Net sales
  $ 194,135     $ 88,144     $ 26,312     $     $ 308,591  
Operating income
    10,911       7,040       2,333             20,284  
Capital expenditures
    7,644       2,767       992       798       12,201  
Depreciation
    3,648       3,430       934       732       8,744  
                                         
Identifiable assets   Plastic   Injection   Profile        
(In thousands)   Films   Molding   Extrusion   Corporate   Consolidated
 
At September 30, 2006
  $ 145,929     $ 113,514     $ 47,559     $ (69,024 )(1)   $ 237,978  
At December 31, 2005
  $ 150,079     $ 110,287     $ 49,235     $ (70,689 )(1)   $ 238,912  
 
(1)   Corporate identifiable assets are primarily intercompany balances that eliminate when combined with other segments.
     
    Severance expense allocated to each operating segment was approximately $412,000, $160,000 and $83,000, respectively, for Plastic Films, Injection Molding, and Profile Extrusion.

13


Table of Contents

Note 10. New Accounting Standards
     In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, (“FIN 48”), with respect to Financial Accounting Standard No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FAS 109”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that we recognize in our consolidated financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 in its consolidated financial statements.
     In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (“SAB 108”) to address diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 requires that we quantify misstatements based on their impact on each of our financial statements and related disclosures. SAB 108 is effective as of the end of our 2006 fiscal year, allowing a one-time transitional cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2006 for errors that were not previously deemed material, but are material under the guidance in SAB 108. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SAB 108 on its consolidated financial statements.
     In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective as of the beginning of the Company’s 2008 fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 11. Severance Expense
     On September 22, 2006, we announced the appointment of Earl W. Powell as Executive Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer as a result of the resignation of Anthony F. Bova, former CEO. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standard No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”, in the third quarter of 2006, the Company recorded approximately $603,000 in severance expense and $151,000 for a non-compete agreement with Mr. Bova. The present value of both the severance and non-compete payments will be amortized over 15 months. The non-compete agreement will be amortized over a period of 15 months. As of September 30, 2006, the unpaid portion of Mr. Bova’s severance of approximately $756,000 is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated interim balance sheet. As of September 30, 2006, the unamortized portion of Mr. Bova’s non-compete agreement of approximately $141,000 is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated interim balance sheet. In addition, the Company recorded approximately $52,000 of additional severance expense in the third quarter of 2006. In the second quarter of 2006, the Company recorded approximately $297,000 in severance expense due to the resignation of John A. Geary, former Senior Vice President and General Manager of our Molded Products Group.

14


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion And Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations
Overview
     Atlantis Plastics, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a leading manufacturer of specialty plastic films and custom injection molded and extruded plastic products with 16 manufacturing plants located throughout the United States. We operate through three operating business segments: Plastic Films, Injection Molding, and Profile Extrusion.
     Plastic Films is a leading manufacturer of specialty plastic films. Three operating divisions comprise the Plastic Films segment: (1) Stretch Films, (2) Custom Films, and (3) Institutional Products. Stretch Films produces high-quality, monolayer and multilayer plastic films used to cover, package and protect products for storage and transportation applications, i.e. for palletization. We are, with our Linear brand, one of the two original producers and one of the largest producers of stretch film in North America. Custom Films produces customized monolayer and multilayer films used as converter sealant webs, acrylic masking, industrial packaging, and in laminates for foam padding of carpet, automotive and medical applications. Institutional Products converts custom films into disposable products such as table covers, gloves and aprons, which are used primarily in the institutional food service industry.
     Injection Molding is a leading manufacturer of both custom and proprietary injection molded products. Injection Molding produces a number of custom injection molded components that are sold primarily to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, in the home appliance, and automotive parts industries. Injection Molding also manufactures a line of proprietary injection molded siding panels for the home building and remodeling markets.
     Profile Extrusion manufactures custom profile extruded plastic products, primarily for use in both trim and functional applications in commercial and consumer products, including mobile homes, residential doors and windows, office furniture and appliances, and recreational vehicles, where we have a leading market share.

15


Table of Contents

     Selected income statement data for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2005 through September 30, 2006 are as follows:
                                                                 
    2006   2005
(In millions)   Q3   Q2   Q1   Year   Q4   Q3   Q2   Q1
     
PLASTIC FILMS VOLUME
    69.3       69.3       60.1       284.0       74.0       75.3       65.8       68.9  
(In pounds)
                                                               
 
                                                               
NET SALES
                                                               
Plastic Films
  $ 71.1     $ 68.7     $ 68.1     $ 272.9     $ 78.8     $ 66.0     $ 62.4     $ 65.7  
Injection Molding
    29.2       32.6       32.2       116.1       27.9       32.0       30.1       26.1  
Profile Extrusion
    8.0       9.3       9.5       35.3       9.0       8.6       9.1       8.6  
     
Total
  $ 108.3     $ 110.6     $ 109.8     $ 424.3     $ 115.7     $ 106.6     $ 101.6     $ 100.4  
 
                                                               
GROSS MARGIN
                                                               
Plastic Films
    11 %     11 %     13 %     15 %     15 %     15 %     15 %     14 %
Injection Molding
    12 %     13 %     16 %     16 %     16 %     16 %     17 %     13 %
Profile Extrusion
    1 %     14 %     8 %     19 %     18 %     16 %     20 %     20 %
     
Total
    10 %     12 %     13 %     15 %     16 %     15 %     16 %     14 %
 
                                                               
OPERATING MARGIN
                                                               
Plastic Films
    3 %     4 %     5 %     6 %     7 %     6 %     6 %     4 %
Injection Molding
    4 %     5 %     8 %     8 %     10 %     9 %     10 %     5 %
Profile Extrusion
    -11 %     4 %     0 %     8 %     5 %     6 %     10 %     11 %
     
Total
    2 %     4 %     5 %     7 %     8 %     7 %     8 %     5 %
Results of Operations
Net Sales
     Net sales for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 were $108.3 million and $328.6 million, respectively, compared to $106.6 million and $308.6 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2005.
     Net sales for the Plastic Films segment increased 8% to $71.1 million for the third quarter of 2006 compared with $66.0 million for the third quarter of 2005. Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased 7% to $207.9 million compared to $194.1 million for the same period in 2005. These increases are primarily due to increased average selling prices, reflecting the pass-through of higher resin costs compared to the prior year. Sales volume (measured in pounds) decreased 8% and 5% for the third quarter and the nine months, respectively, in comparison to the prior year periods.
     Net sales for the Injection Molding segment for the quarter declined 9% but increased 7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2005. Volume growth within the Injection Molding segment has been slowed by weakness in the housing market.
     Net sales for the Profile Extrusion segment for the quarter declined 7% but increased 2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2005. The slow down is primarily due to weakness in the recreational vehicle market and continued operating inefficiencies in our Elkhart, Indiana facilities.

16


Table of Contents

Gross Margin and Operating Margin
     Gross margin decreased to 10% and 12% for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 15% for both periods, respectively, in 2005. Operating margins were 2% and 4% for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 7% for both periods, respectively, in 2005. Operating expenses for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 include severance expenses of $0.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 include $0.6 million of costs associated with a financing effort that was not consummated during the first quarter of 2005 and $0.5 million of compensation expense relating to the cancellation of stock options, also in the first quarter of 2005.
     In the Plastic Films segment, gross margin and operating margin were 11% and 3%, respectively, for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared with 15% and 6%, respectively, for the same period in the 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, gross margin and operating margin were 12% and 4%, respectively, compared to 15% and 6%, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2005. During the first nine months of 2006, our volume shipped was down 5% year-over-year as we saw a continuing weakness in order rates as inventory levels were reduced throughout the distribution channel.
     In the Injection Molding segment, gross margin was 12% and 16% for the quarters ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and operating margin decreased to 4% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to 9% for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, gross margin and operating margin were 14% and 6%, respectively, compared to 16% and 8%, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2005. The downturn in the housing sector, in both new home construction and remodeling markets, has resulted in a weakening of order rates from both our OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) appliance and building products customers.
     In the Profile Extrusion segment, gross margin and operating margin decreased to 1% and -11%, respectively, for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, from 16% and 6%, respectively, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, gross margin and operating margin declined to 8% and -2%, respectively, from 19% and 9%, respectively, for the same period of 2005. These declines were due to weakness in recreational vehicle demand and operational inefficiencies in our Elkhart, Indiana facilities.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense
     Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased to $8.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, including severance charges of $0.7 million, from $9.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, and decreased to $26.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, including $1.0 million in severance charges, compared to $26.7 million in the prior year including $0.6 million of costs associated with a financing effort that was not consummated. Selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of net sales were 8% for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 8% for the quarter and 9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Net Interest Expense and Unamortized Deferred Financing Cost
     Net interest expense for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased to $5.1 million and $14.7 million, respectively, compared to $4.5 million and $10.3 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2005. The increases were primarily due to higher average outstanding borrowings under our new $220.0 million credit facility and higher average interest rates on borrowings outstanding. Unamortized deferred financing costs written off during the first quarter of 2005 were $3.8 million as a result of replacing our

17


Table of Contents

previously existing credit facility of $120.0 million with our new $220.0 million credit facility in March 2005.
Operating and Net (Loss) Income
     As a result of the factors described above, operating income decreased to $2.3 million, 2% of net sales, during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, compared with $7.4 million, 7% of net sales, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, operating income decreased to $13.0 million, 4% of net sales, compared to $20.3 million, 7% of net sales, for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
     Net (loss) income and basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months   Nine Months
    Ended September 30,   Ended September 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)   2006   2005   2006   2005
 
Net (loss) income
  $ (1,754 )   $ 1,946     $ (964 )   $ 4,059  
 
                               
(Loss) earnings per share – basic
  $ (0.21 )   $ 0.24     $ (0.12 )   $ 0.50  
(Loss) earnings per share – diluted
  $ (0.21 )   $ 0.24     $ (0.12 )   $ 0.50  
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     At September 30, 2006, we had $47 thousand in cash and cash equivalents, $209.2 million of outstanding indebtedness, and an additional $10.6 million of unused availability, net of outstanding letters of credit of approximately $1.6 million, under our new $220.0 million secured financing credit facility entered into on March 22, 2005. The new financing includes a $25.0 million revolving credit facility maturing March 2011, a $120.0 million senior secured term loan facility maturing September 2011 and a $75.0 million junior secured term loan facility maturing March 2012. Substantially all of our accounts receivable, inventories and property and equipment are pledged as collateral under this credit facility.
     Proceeds from the new financing facility were used to repay previously existing senior secured debt of $83.9 million outstanding on March 22, 2005 and to pay related fees and expenses. In connection with the cancellation of our previous credit facility, we wrote-off approximately $3.8 million of deferred financing costs associated with the old facility during the first quarter of fiscal 2005. Additionally, we expensed approximately $0.6 million of costs associated with a financing effort that was not consummated. Furthermore, on March 22, 2005, our Board of Directors declared a special one-time cash dividend of $12.50 per common share, which was paid on April 8, 2005, to shareholders of record as of April 1, 2005. This dividend aggregated approximately $103.2 million and was funded by proceeds from our new credit facility. Along with the special dividend payment, we paid approximately $4.4 million to holders of outstanding stock options in exchange for the cancellation of those options. As a result of the option cancellations, we recorded compensation expense in the amount of $408,000 during the first quarter of 2005 in accordance with the provision of FAS 123R, which we adopted on January 1, 2005.
     In October 2006, we amended our senior secured term loan and revolving credit facility agreement to waive September 30, 2006 financial covenants, impose monthly minimum EBITDA requirements for October 2006 and November 2006, increase applicable borrowing spreads beginning November 1, 2006, and require us

18


Table of Contents

to maintain availability under our credit facilities of at least $3.0 million. The amendment allows us to prepay our junior credit facility subject to certain provisions. In addition, the amendment requires us to retain a financial advisor to examine our financial forecast and our performance relative to our peers. We are currently negotiating with the senior secured lenders to amend certain financial covenants through the remainder of the loan term. While we believe we will be successful in negotiating acceptable financial covenants, we can make no such guarantee. Without an amendment to the covenants, our projections indicate that we would not be able to comply with the current covenants for the remainder of 2006 throughout 2007. Failure to comply with covenants contained in our senior secured credit agreement, if not waived or amended, would result in a default under the agreement. Under an event of default, the lender may, (a) reduce the aggregate amount of the obligations, (b) declare all or any portion of the obligations immediately due and payable, or (c) terminate future advances. Any default under our senior secured credit agreement, particularly any default that results in acceleration of indebtedness or foreclosure on collateral, would have a material adverse effect on us. We classified all of our senior secured debt as a current liability as of September 30, 2006 as a result of the potential for the acceleration of the loans outstanding under the senior secured term loan in the event that we are unable to obtain an amendment to the current covenants.
     In October 2006, we amended our junior secured term loan agreement to waive September 30, 2006 financial covenants, increase the applicable borrowing spread from 7.25% to 9.00%, amend certain covenant ratios, restrict certain of our expenditures subject to maintaining certain financial ratios, and pay a fee. We are in full compliance with this loan agreement, and our projections indicate that it is probable we will remain in compliance for the remainder of 2006 and throughout 2007. Accordingly, we have classified this obligation as a long-term liability.
     Our principal needs for liquidity, on both a short and long-term basis, relate to working capital (principally accounts receivable and inventories), debt service, and capital expenditures. Presently, we do not have any material commitments for future capital expenditures.
     Our high debt level and our continuing ability to comply with debt covenants present substantial risks and could have negative consequences. For example, it could (1) require us to dedicate all or a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to debt service, limiting the availability of cash for other purposes; (2) increase our vulnerability to adverse general economic conditions by making it more difficult to maintain compliance with our debt covenants or to borrow additional funds to maintain our operations if we suffer shortfalls in net sales; (3) hinder our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry by preventing us from borrowing money to upgrade equipment or facilities; and (4) limit or impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, or general corporate purposes.
     In the event that our cash flow from operations is not sufficient to fund our expenditures or to service our indebtedness, we would be required to raise additional funds through the sale of assets or subsidiaries. There can be no assurance that any of these sources of funds would be available in amounts sufficient for us to meet our obligations. Moreover, even if we were able to meet our obligations, our highly leveraged capital structure could significantly limit our ability to finance our expansion program and other capital expenditures, to compete effectively, or to operate successfully under adverse economic conditions.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
     Net cash used for operating activities was $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $3.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The use of operating cash flow during 2006 resulted primarily from higher working capital requirements, comprised of a reduction in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $10.9 million, an increase in other assets and liabilities of $1.6 million, an increase in other current assets of $0.6 million, an increase in accounts receivable of $0.7 million, amortization of $0.7 million for a redeemed swap, and an increase in inventory of $0.2 million, and, partially offset by $9.2 million in depreciation and $0.7 million of loan fee amortization. The use of operating cash flow during the same period in 2005 was attributable to an increase in accounts receivable of $10.6 million, a decrease of $6.1 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses, an increase in inventories of $2.9 million, and an increase of other current assets of $2.7 million, partially offset by depreciation of $8.7 million, other amortization of $4.4 million, an unconsummated finance charge of $0.6 million, and $0.5 million share-based compensation expense.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
     Net cash used for investing activities decreased to $8.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $12.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as a result of decreased capital expenditures, net of proceeds from asset dispositions, between the periods.

19


Table of Contents

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
     Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $13.3 million, compared with net cash provided of $16.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 resulted primarily from net borrowings of $11.6 million under our revolving credit facility and proceeds of $3.4 million from the swap redemption, offset by $1.2 million of repayments under term loans, $0.4 million in repayments of bonds, and $0.1 million in financing costs associated with credit agreements. Net cash provided by financing activities for the first nine months of 2005 reflect net borrowings of $207.9 million under our new credit agreement, a $3.7 million income tax benefit due to the exercise of employee stock options, $2.5 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the receipt of approximately $0.5 million in repayments of shareholder notes. These amounts were offset by a $103.2 million payment of a one-time special dividend to shareholders on April 8, 2005, net repayments of $87.7 million on our retired credit facility, and $6.7 million of financing costs associated with our credit agreements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, (“FIN 48”), with respect to Financial Accounting Standard No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FAS 109”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that we recognize in our consolidated financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting FIN 48.
     In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (“SAB 108”) to address diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 requires that we quantify misstatements based on their impact on each of our financial statements and related disclosures. SAB 108 is effective as of the end of our 2006 fiscal year, allowing a one-time transitional cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2006 for errors that were not previously deemed material, but are material under the guidance in SAB 108. We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting SAB 108.
     In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS 157.
Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Additional written or oral forward-looking statements may be made from time to time, in press releases, annual or quarterly reports to shareholders, filings with the Securities Exchange Commission, presentations or otherwise. Statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions referenced above.

20


Table of Contents

     Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of net sales, income or losses, or capital expenditures; plans for future operations; financing needs or plans; compliance with financial covenants in loan agreements; plans for liquidation or sale of assets or businesses; plans relating to our products or services; assessments of materiality; predictions of future events; the ability to obtain additional financing; our ability to meet obligations as they become due; the impact of pending and possible litigation; as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing. In addition, when used in this discussion, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the impact of leverage, dependence on major customers, fluctuating demand for our products, risks in product and technology development, fluctuating resin prices, competition, litigation, labor disputes, capital requirements, and other risk factors detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified based on current expectations.
     Consequently, future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak only as of the date hereof. We do not undertake an obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     For a discussion of certain market risks related to the Company, see the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk section in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
     On March 22, 2005, the Company replaced its existing credit facility with a new credit agreement resulting in variable rate debt outstanding at September 30, 2006. Currently, the Company has an interest rate swap agreement which matures in June 2008 that has the effect of converting $125 million of the Company’s floating rate debt to a fixed rate. The Company has designated this interest rate swap agreement as a cash flow hedge (see also Note 5. Debt and Note 8. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities). The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to manage its exposure of interest rate changes on the Company’s variable rate debt. For each $10.0 million of variable rate debt outstanding, a 25 basis point increase or decrease in the level of interest rates (primarily LIBOR) would, respectively, increase or decrease annual interest expense by approximately $25,000.
     There have been no other significant changes with respect to market risks related to the Company since December 31, 2005.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
     Our Interim Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2006. Based on this evaluation, our Interim CEO and CFO have each concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that we record, process, summarize, and report information required to be disclosed by us in our quarterly reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. During the quarterly period covered by this report, there have not been any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Subsequent to the date of their evaluation, there have not been any significant changes in our internal controls or in other facts that could significantly effect these controls.

21


Table of Contents

Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     The Company is not a party to any legal proceeding other than routine litigation incidental to its business, none of which is expected to have a material effect on the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 6. Exhibits
(A) EXHIBITS
         
  31.1    
CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  31.2    
CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.1    
CEO Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.2    
CFO Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

22


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  ATLANTIS PLASTICS, INC.
 
 
Date: November 14, 2006  By:   /s/ V.M Philbrook    
    V.M. PHILBROOK   
    President and Chief Operating Officer   
 
     
Date: November 14, 2006  By:   /s/ Paul G. Saari    
    PAUL G. SAARI   
    Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
 
 

23


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit Index
         
  31.1    
CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  31.2    
CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.1    
CEO Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.2    
CFO Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.