e424b1
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1)
Registration No. 333-145386
Prospectus
53,595,665 Shares
SandRidge
Energy, Inc.
Common
Stock
This prospectus relates to up to 53,595,665 shares of the
common stock of SandRidge Energy, Inc., which may be offered for
sale by the selling stockholders named in this prospectus. The
shares of common stock offered by this prospectus were acquired
by the selling stockholders, or are issuable upon conversion of
securities acquired by the selling stockholders, in connection
with our December 2005, November 2006 and March 2007 private
placements. We are registering the offer and sale of the shares
of common stock to satisfy registration rights we have granted.
We are not selling any shares of common stock under this
prospectus and will not receive any proceeds from the sale of
common stock by the selling stockholders. The shares of common
stock to which this prospectus relates may be offered and sold
from time to time directly from the selling stockholders or
alternatively through underwriters or broker-dealers or agents.
The shares of common stock may be sold in one or more
transactions, at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at
the time of sale or at negotiated prices. Please read Plan
of Distribution.
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol SD.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
See Risk Factors beginning on page 13.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved these
securities or determined if this prospectus is accurate or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is
January 7, 2008
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus or to which we have referred you. We and the selling
stockholders have not authorized anyone to provide you with
different information. We and the selling stockholders are not
making an offer of these securities in any jurisdiction where
such offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the
information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of the
date on the front of this prospectus only. Our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects may
have changed since that date.
This prospectus is part of a shelf registration
statement that we filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) for a continuous offering.
Under this prospectus, the selling stockholders may, from time
to time, sell the shares of our common stock described in this
prospectus in one or more offerings. This prospectus may be
supplemented from time to time to add, update or change
information in this prospectus. Any statement contained in this
prospectus will be deemed to be modified or superseded for the
purposes of this prospectus to the extent that a statement
contained in a prospectus supplement modifies such statement.
Any statement so modified will be deemed to constitute a part of
this prospectus only as so modified, and any statement so
modified will be deemed to constitute a part of this
prospectus.
i
The registration statement containing this prospectus,
including the exhibits to the registration statement, provides
additional information about us, the selling stockholders and
the shares of our common stock offered under this prospectus.
The registration statement, including the exhibits, can be read
on the SEC website or at the SEC offices mentioned under the
heading Where You Can Find More Information.
Information contained in our website does not constitute part of
this prospectus.
SandRidge Energy, Inc., our logo and other trademarks mentioned
in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.
This prospectus includes market share and industry data that we
obtained from internal research, publicly available information
and industry publications and surveys. Our internal research and
forecasts are based upon managements understanding of
industry conditions. Industry surveys and publications generally
state that the information contained therein has been obtained
from sources believed to be reliable.
ii
This summary contains basic information about us and the
offering. Because it is a summary, it does not contain all of
the information that you should consider before investing in our
common stock. You should read and carefully consider this entire
prospectus before making an investment decision, especially the
information presented under the heading Risk Factors
and the consolidated and pro forma condensed combined financial
statements and the accompanying notes thereto included elsewhere
in this prospectus. We have provided definitions for some of the
natural gas and oil industry terms used in this prospectus in
the Glossary of Natural Gas and Oil Terms on
page A-1
of this prospectus. Natural gas equivalents are determined using
the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl of crude oil,
condensate or natural gas liquids. Unless otherwise noted, all
natural gas amounts are net of
CO2
or have
CO2
levels within pipeline specifications.
On December 29, 2006, we merged with and into a newly
formed Delaware corporation and changed our name from Riata
Energy, Inc. to SandRidge Energy, Inc. The purpose of the merger
was to change our jurisdiction of incorporation from Texas to
Delaware. Except as otherwise indicated or required by the
context, references in this prospectus to we,
us, our, SandRidge,
Riata, or the Company refer to the
business of SandRidge Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries after
the merger and its predecessor, Riata Energy, Inc., and its
subsidiaries prior to the merger.
Overview
SandRidge is a rapidly expanding independent natural gas and oil
company concentrating in exploration, development and production
activities. We are focused on expanding our continuing
exploration and exploitation of our significant holdings in an
area of West Texas that we refer to as the West Texas
Overthrust, or WTO, a natural gas prone geological
region where we have operated since 1986 that includes the
Piñon Field and our South Sabino and Big Canyon prospects.
We intend to add to our existing reserve and production base in
this area by increasing our development drilling activities in
the Piñon Field and our exploration program in other
prospects that we have identified. As a result of our 2006
acquisitions, including the NEG acquisition, we have nearly
tripled our net acreage position in the WTO since January 2006.
We believe that we are the largest operator and producer in the
WTO and have assembled the largest acreage position in the area.
We also operate significant interests in the Cotton Valley Trend
in East Texas, the Gulf Coast area, the Gulf of Mexico and the
Piceance Basin of Colorado.
We have assembled an extensive natural gas and oil property base
in which we have identified over 4,500 potential drilling
locations including over 2,600 in the WTO. As of June 30,
2007, our proved reserves were 1,174.0 Bcfe, of which 82%
were natural gas and 97.5% of which were prepared by independent
petroleum engineers. We had 1,469 gross (1,040 net)
producing wells, substantially all of which we operate. As of
September 30, 2007, we had interests in approximately
1,112,231 gross (763,032 net) natural gas and oil
leased acres. We had 30 rigs drilling in the WTO as of
September 30, 2007.
We also operate businesses that are complementary to our primary
exploration, development and production activities, which
provides us with operational flexibility and an advantageous
cost structure. We own a fleet of 32 drilling rigs, five of
which are currently being retrofitted. In addition, we are party
to a joint venture that owns an additional twelve rigs, eleven
of which are currently operating. We own related oil field
services businesses, gas gathering and treating facilities and a
marketing business. We also capture and supply
CO2
to support our tertiary oil recovery projects undertaken by us
or third-parties. These assets are primarily located in our
primary operating area in West Texas.
We expanded our management team significantly in 2006. Tom L.
Ward, the co-founder and former President and Chief Operating
Officer of Chesapeake Energy Corporation
(Chesapeake), purchased a significant ownership
interest in us June 2006 and joined us as Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board. During Mr. Wards
17 year tenure at Chesapeake, Chesapeake became one of the
most active onshore drillers in the United States. From 1998 to
2005, Chesapeake drilled over 6,500 wells. Since
Mr. Ward joined us, we have added eight new executive
officers, substantially all of whom have experience at public
1
exploration and production companies. We have also added key
professionals in exploration, operations, land, accounting and
finance.
In addition, we significantly increased our proved reserves and
producing properties through the acquisition of NEG Oil and Gas
LLC, or NEG, in November 2006. NEG owned core assets in the Val
Verde and Permian Basins of West Texas, including overlapping or
contiguous interests in the properties that we own in the WTO.
Our estimated capital expenditures for 2007 of approximately
$1,200 million (excluding recent acquisitions of
approximately $71 million) include $943 million
allocated to exploration and development (including land and
seismic acquisitions and our tertiary recovery operations),
$115 million allocated to drilling and oil field services
and $103 million allocated to midstream operations.
Approximately $704 million of our 2007 capital expenditures
will be spent on our Piñon Field development and our
exploratory projects in the WTO (including land and seismic
acquisitions). Under this capital budget, we plan to drill
approximately 296 gross (256 net) wells in 2007,
including approximately 207 gross (177 net) wells in
the WTO. The actual number of wells drilled and the amount of
our 2007 capital expenditures will be dependent upon market
conditions, availability of capital and drilling and production
results. We have made capital expenditures of
$895.2 million in the first nine months of 2007.
Our
Strategy
Our primary objective is to achieve long-term growth and
maximize stockholder value over multiple business cycles by
pursuing the following strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Grow Through Exploration and Aggressive Drilling and
Development of Existing Acreage. We expect to
generate long-term reserve and production growth by exploring
and aggressively drilling and developing our large acreage
position. Our primary exploration and development focus will be
in the WTO, where we have identified over 2,600 potential
drilling locations and had 30 rigs operating as of
September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Apply Technological Improvements to Our Exploration and
Development Program. We intend to enhance our
drilling success rate and completion efficiency with improved
3-D seismic
acquisition and interpretation technologies, together with
advanced drilling, completion and production methods that
historically have not been widely used in the under-explored WTO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seek Opportunistic Acquisitions in Our Core Geographic
Area. Since January 2006, through acquisitions
and leasing activities, we have nearly tripled our net acreage
position in the WTO. We intend to continue to seek other
opportunities to optimize and enhance our exploratory acreage
position in the WTO and other strategic areas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduce Costs, Enhance Returns and Maintain Operating
Flexibility by Controlling Drilling Rigs and Midstream
Assets. Our rig fleet enables us to aggressively
develop our own acreage while maintaining the flexibility of a
third-party contract drilling business. By controlling our fleet
of drilling rigs and gathering and treating assets, we believe
we will be able to better control overall costs and maintain a
high degree of operational flexibility.
|
|
|
|
Capture and Utilize
CO2
for Tertiary Oil Recovery. We intend to
capitalize on our access to
CO2
reserves and
CO2
flooding expertise to pursue enhanced oil recovery in mature oil
fields in West Texas. By utilizing this
CO2
in our own tertiary recovery projects, we expect to recover
additional oil that would have otherwise been abandoned
following traditional waterfloods.
|
Competitive
Strengths
We have a number of strengths that we believe will help us
successfully execute our strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Large Asset Base with Substantial Drilling
Inventory. Our producing properties are
characterized by long-lived predominantly natural gas reserves
with established production profiles. Our estimated proved
reserves of 1,174.0 Bcfe as of June 30, 2007 had a
proved reserves to production ratio of
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 19 years. Our core area of operations in the
WTO has expanded to 581,961 gross (480,721 net) acres
as of June 30, 2007. We have identified over 2,600
potential drilling locations in the WTO and believe that we will
be able to expand the number of drilling locations in the
remainder of the WTO through exploratory drilling and our use of
3-D seismic
technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographically Concentrated Exploration and Development
Operations. We intend to focus our drilling and
development operations in the near term on the WTO to fully
exploit this unique geological region. This geographic
concentration allows us to establish economies of scale in both
drilling and production operations to achieve lower production
costs and generate increased cash flows from our producing
properties. We believe our concentrated acreage position will
enable us to organically grow our reserves and production for
the next several years.
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team Focused on Delivering Long-term
Stockholder Value. During 2006, we significantly
expanded our management team when Tom L. Ward, co-founder and
former president of Chesapeake, purchased a significant interest
in us and became our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. We
also hired a new chief financial officer, three additional
executive vice presidents and other additional senior
executives. Our management team, board of directors and
employees owned over 35% of our capital stock on a fully-diluted
basis as of November 30, 2007, which we believe aligns
their objectives with those of our stockholders.
|
|
|
|
High Degree of Operational Control. We operate
over 95% of our production in the WTO, East Texas and the Gulf
Coast area, which permits us to manage our operating costs and
better control capital expenditures and the timing of
development and exploitation activities.
|
|
|
|
Large Modern Fleet of Drilling Rigs. By
controlling a large, modern and more efficient drilling fleet,
we can develop our existing reserves and explore for new
reserves on a more economic basis.
|
Our
Businesses and Primary Operations
Exploration
and Production
We explore for, develop and produce natural gas and oil
reserves, with a focus on increasing our reserves and production
in the WTO. We operate substantially all of our wells in the
WTO. We also have significant operated leasehold positions in
the Cotton Valley Trend in East Texas and the Gulf Coast area,
as well as other non-core operating areas.
The following table identifies certain information concerning
our exploration and production business as of September 30,
2007 unless otherwise noted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified
|
|
|
|
Net Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
PV-10
(in
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Reserves/
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
Area
|
|
(Bcfe)(1)
|
|
|
millions)(1)(2)
|
|
|
(Mmcfe/d)(3)
|
|
|
Production(1)
|
|
|
Acreage
|
|
|
Acreage
|
|
|
Locations(1)
|
|
|
WTO
|
|
|
648.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,190.9
|
|
|
|
69.1
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
(4)
|
|
|
581,961
|
|
|
|
480,721
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
East Texas
|
|
|
156.3
|
|
|
|
310.2
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
48,606
|
|
|
|
32,557
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
Gulf Coast
|
|
|
104.5
|
|
|
|
410.7
|
|
|
|
44.2
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
53,464
|
|
|
|
34,765
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Other(5)
|
|
|
265.9
|
|
|
|
646.9
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
428,200
|
|
|
|
214,989
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,174.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,558.8
|
|
|
|
176.7
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
1,112,231
|
|
|
|
763,032
|
|
|
|
4,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimated net proved reserves, PV-10 and identified potential
drilling locations are as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
PV-10 generally differs from Standardized Measure of Discounted
Net Cash Flows, or Standardized Measure, which is measured only
at fiscal year end, because it does not include the effects of
income taxes on future net revenues. For a reconciliation of
PV-10 to
Standardized Measure as of December 31, 2006, see
Summary Historical Operating and Reserve Data. Our
Standardized Measure was $1,440.2 million at
December 31, 2006. |
3
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Represents average daily net production for the third quarter
2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Our proved reserves to production ratio in the WTO is
significantly higher than our other areas of operation because
of the high volume of our proved undeveloped reserves in this
area. We expect this ratio to decrease as our production in the
WTO increases. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes our properties located offshore in the Gulf of Mexico,
the Piceance Basin of Colorado, Other West Texas areas,
including our tertiary oil recovery projects, and the Arkoma and
Anadarko Basins and other non-strategic areas. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 828 identified potential drilling locations in the
Piceance Basin. |
West
Texas Overthrust (WTO)
We have drilled and developed natural gas in the WTO since 1986.
This area is located in Pecos and Terrell Counties in West Texas
and provides for multi-pay exploration and development
opportunities. The WTO has historically been largely
under-explored due primarily to the remoteness and lack of
infrastructure in the region, as well as historical limitations
of conventional subsurface geological and geophysical methods.
However, several fields including our prolific Piñon Field
have been discovered. These fields have produced more than
255 Bcfe from less than 410 wells through
September 30, 2007. We believe our access to and control of
the necessary infrastructure combined with application of modern
seismic techniques will allow us to identify further exploration
and development opportunities in the WTO.
In May 2007, we began the first phase of
3-D seismic
data acquisition in the WTO. This is the first of six phases
planned over the next three years to acquire 1,300 square
miles of 3-D
seismic data in the WTO. We believe this
3-D seismic
program may identify structural details of potential reservoirs,
thus lowering the risk of exploratory drilling and improving
completion efficiency. The first two phases of the seismic
program will cover 360 square miles and should both be
completed by the end of 2007.
We have aggressively acquired leasehold acreage in the WTO,
nearly tripling our position since January 2006. As of
September 30, 2007, we owned 581,961 gross
(480,721 net) acres in the WTO, substantially all of which
are along the leading edge of the WTO.
Piñon Field. The Piñon Field,
located in Pecos County, is our most significant producing
field, and accounts for 55% of our proved reserve base as of
June 30, 2007, and approximately 75% of our 2007
exploration and development budget (including land and seismic
acquisitions). The Piñon Field lies along the leading edge
of the WTO.
As of June 30, 2007, our estimated proved natural gas and
oil reserves in the Piñon Field were 648.3 Bcfe, 66%
of which were proved undeveloped reserves. This field has
produced approximately 205 Bcfe through September 30,
2007 and currently produces in excess of
118 gross Mmcfe per day.
Our interests in the Piñon Field included 351 producing
wells as of September 30, 2007. We had an 84.4% average
working interest in the producing area of Piñon Field and
were running 30 drilling rigs in the Piñon Field as of
September 30, 2007. We estimate that we will drill
approximately 205 wells in the field during 2007, the
majority of which will be development wells. As of June 30,
2007, we have identified 2,658 potential well locations in the
Piñon Field, including 406 proved undeveloped drilling
locations.
West Texas Overthrust Prospects. Through our
exploratory drilling program, we have identified two prospect
areas in the WTO, the South Sabino Prospect and the Big Canyon
Prospect areas, on which we will drill exploratory wells in late
2007 or early 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
South Sabino Prospect Area. The South Sabino
prospect area is located approximately twelve miles east of the
Piñon Field. We have drilled two wells that appear to be on
trend with the Piñon Field and are structurally higher
against one of several thrust faults that make up the WTO. We
began the first phase of our
3-D seismic
program in this area in 2007 and may drill additional wells in
late 2007 following the integration of this data and new
subsurface well control.
|
|
|
|
Big Canyon Prospect Area. Located
approximately 20 miles east of the Piñon Field along
the WTO, this prospect area represents potential opportunities
for future development. We plan to conduct a
3-D
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
seismic survey over the Big Canyon prospect area as part of
Phase II of our
3-D seismic
program in 2007. Exploratory wells may be planned in late 2007
and early 2008 to further evaluate both the Tesnus and the
Caballos in a location structurally updip to the Big Canyon
Ranch 106-1 well.
|
WTO Development Opportunities. The following
table provides additional information concerning our development
in the WTO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Net
|
|
|
Gross PUD
|
|
|
Gross PUD
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
Gross 2007
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Rigs
|
|
PUD Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
Budget
|
|
|
End Rigs
|
|
|
Working at 3Q
|
|
(Bcfe)(1)
|
|
|
(Bcfe)(1)
|
|
|
Locations(1)
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
|
(in millions)(2)
|
|
|
Working
|
|
|
2007 End
|
|
|
|
431.1
|
|
|
|
675.2
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of June 30, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes capital expenditures related to land and seismic
acquisitions. |
East Texas Cotton Valley Trend. We
own significant interests in the natural gas bearing Cotton
Valley Trend, which covers a portion of East Texas and Northern
Louisiana. The production in this region is generally
characterized as long-lived. We intend to target the tight sands
reservoirs and plan to have five rigs running in this region
during the remainder of 2007. As of June 30, 2007, East
Texas accounted for 156.3 Bcfe of proved reserves, 566
potential drilling locations of which 49 are anticipated to be
drilled in 2007, and approximately $110 million of budgeted
2007 capital expenditures.
Gulf Coast Area. We own natural gas and oil
interests in the Gulf Coast area, which encompasses the large
coastal plain from the southernmost tip of Texas through the
southern portion of Louisiana. Operations in this area are
generally characterized as being comparatively higher risk and
higher potential than in the other primary areas in which we
operate, with successful wells typically having relatively
higher initial production rates with steeper declines and
shorter production lives. As of June 30, 2007, the Gulf
Coast area accounted for 105.7 Bcfe of proved reserves, 51
potential drilling locations and approximately $28 million
of budgeted 2007 capital expenditures.
Other Exploration and Production Areas. We own
significant natural gas and oil assets in the Gulf of Mexico and
the Piceance Basin. Our Gulf of Mexico properties are located in
bay and other shallow waters and produce a significant amount of
natural gas and oil. Our acreage in the Piceance Basin of
northwestern Colorado, a sedimentary basin in one of the
countrys most prolific natural gas producing regions, is
substantially undeveloped. We intend to manage our investments
in the Gulf of Mexico and the Piceance Basin area to maximize
returns without increasing future capital expenditures
significantly.
We also own natural gas and oil interests in West Texas other
than the WTO, including our tertiary oil recovery operations. In
addition, we own interests in properties in the Arkoma and
Anadarko Basins and other non-strategic areas that are primarily
operated by third-parties.
Drilling
and Oil Field Services
We drill onshore for our own interests through our drilling and
oil field services subsidiary, Lariat Services, Inc.
(Lariat Services). We also drill wells for other
natural gas and oil companies, primarily in West Texas. We own
or operate a total of 38 operational rigs, including eleven
operational rigs owned by Larclay, L.P. (Larclay), a
joint venture with Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.
(CWEI). We also own five rigs that are currently
being retrofitted. Our rig fleet is designed to drill in our
specific areas of operation in West Texas and the WTO. The rigs
average in excess of 800 horsepower and have an average depth
capacity greater than 10,500 feet.
Our oil field services divisions provide services that
complement our exploration and production operations. These
services include location and road construction, trucking,
roustabout services, pulling units, coiled tubing units, rental
tools and air drilling equipment. These services are primarily
used for our own
5
account, however, some of our service divisions also perform
work for third parties. We also provide under-balanced drilling
systems services for our own account.
Midstream
Gas Services and Other Operations
To complement our exploration and production operations,
particularly in the Piñon Field and surrounding areas, we
provide gathering, compression, processing and treating services
of natural gas. We have a 100% interest in and operate the
Pikes Peak gas treatment plant in West Texas and a 50%
interest in the partnership that leases and operates the Grey
Ranch gas treatment plant located in the WTO. The Pikes
Peak and Grey Ranch gas treatment plants have capacity of
58 Mmcf per day and 82 Mmcf per day of high
CO2
gas, respectively. These two gas treatment plants, along with
two third-party plants in this area, serve as the primary source
of
CO2
for our current and planned tertiary oil recovery operations. We
also operate or own approximately 300 miles of West Texas
natural gas gathering pipelines. At September 30, 2007 we
operated or owned approximately 39,200 horsepower of gas
compression.
In order to ensure sufficient capacity for our existing and
future Piñon Field production, we plan to install an
additional 13,400 horsepower of compression and
approximately 20 miles of large diameter pipeline by the
end of 2007.
Additionally, with our anticipated increase of high
CO2
gas production from the WTO over the next several years, we
intend to build supplemental treating capacity, pipeline
gathering infrastructure and compression facilities to
accommodate our aggressive growth plans.
Our
CO2
gathering and tertiary oil recovery operations are conducted
through our subsidiary, PetroSource Energy Company, L.P.
(PetroSource). PetroSource is the sole gatherer of
CO2
from the four natural gas treatment plants located in the WTO.
PetroSource owns 231 miles of
CO2
pipelines in West Texas with approximately 92,000 horsepower of
owned and leased
CO2
compression.
CO2
injection has proven to be ideal in recovering additional oil
that remains after traditional water flooding has been
completed. We have interests in four current or potential
CO2
flood tertiary oil recovery projects in the West Texas region,
the Wellman Unit, the George Allen Unit, the South Mallet Unit
and the Jones Ranch area. We believe we have a competitive
advantage in identifying, acquiring and developing these
properties because of our strong expertise and available
CO2
supply.
Initial
Public Offering
On November 9, 2007, we completed the initial public
offering of our common stock. We sold 28,700,000 shares of
our common stock, including 4,170,000 shares sold directly
to an entity controlled by Tom L. Ward. The shares were sold at
a price of $26 per share. We received net proceeds of
approximately $705.4 million after deducting underwriting
discounts of approximately $38.3 million and estimated
offering expenses of approximately $2.5 million net. In
conjunction with the offering, we granted the underwriters an
option to purchase 3,679,500 additional shares of our common
stock, which was exercised in full. After deducting underwriting
discounts of approximately $5.7 million, we received net
proceeds of approximately $89.9 million from these
additional shares. The aggregate net proceeds of approximately
$795.3 million were utilized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of outstanding balance on senior credit facility
|
|
$
|
515.9
|
|
Repayment of note payable and accrued interest incurred in
connection with recent acquisition
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
Excess cash to fund future capital expenditures
|
|
|
230.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
795.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Risk
Factors
Investing in our common stock involves risks, including, without
limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
natural gas and oil prices are volatile, and a decline in
natural gas and oil prices can significantly affect our
financial results and impede our growth;
|
|
|
|
our estimated reserves are based on many assumptions that may
turn out to be inaccurate, and any significant inaccuracies in
these reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will
materially affect the quantities and present value of our
reserves;
|
|
|
|
unless we replace our natural gas and oil reserves, our reserves
and production will decline, which would adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations;
|
|
|
|
our potential drilling location inventories are scheduled out
over several years, making them susceptible to uncertainties
that could materially alter the occurrence or timing of their
drilling;
|
|
|
|
the development of the proved undeveloped reserves in the WTO
may take longer and may require higher levels of capital
expenditures than we currently anticipate;
|
|
|
|
a significant portion of our operations are located in the WTO,
making us vulnerable to risks associated with operating in one
major geographic area;
|
|
|
|
we have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which may
adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to operate our
business; and
|
|
|
|
certain stockholders shares are restricted from immediate
resale but may be sold into the market in the near future, which
could cause the market price of our common stock to drop
significantly.
|
Our
Offices
Our company was founded in 1984 and is incorporated in Delaware.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1601 N.W.
Expressway, Suite 1600, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118, and
our telephone number at that address is
(405) 753-5500.
7
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders(1) |
|
53,595,665 shares |
|
Common stock outstanding(2) |
|
141,845,661 shares |
|
Common Stock to be outstanding assuming the conversion of our
convertible preferred stock |
|
164,121,472 shares |
|
Dividend policy |
|
We do not anticipate that we will pay cash dividends in the
foreseeable future. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of
common stock by the selling stockholders. |
|
New York Stock Exchange Symbol |
|
SD |
|
|
(1)
|
See Selling Stockholders for information on the
selling stockholders.
|
|
(2)
|
As of November 30, 2007. The shares exclude
22,275,871 shares issuable upon conversion of our
convertible preferred stock and the exercise of all warrants for
convertible preferred stock.
|
8
Summary
Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Combined Financial
Data
Set forth below is our summary consolidated historical and
unaudited pro forma combined financial data for the periods
indicated. The historical financial data for the periods ended
December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and the balance sheet data
as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 have been derived from our
audited financial statements. Our historical financial data as
of September 30, 2007 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007 are derived from our unaudited
financial statements and, in our opinion, have been prepared on
the same basis as the audited financial statements and include
all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair statement of this information. The pro
forma financial data have been derived from our unaudited pro
forma financial statements included in this prospectus, which
give pro forma effect to the transactions described in
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements. You should read the following summary
financial data in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our historical and pro forma financial
statements and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
175,995
|
|
|
$
|
287,693
|
|
|
$
|
388,242
|
|
|
$
|
263,177
|
|
|
$
|
461,775
|
|
|
$
|
439,557
|
|
|
$
|
565,256
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
10,230
|
|
|
|
16,195
|
|
|
|
35,149
|
|
|
|
21,625
|
|
|
|
77,707
|
|
|
|
64,009
|
|
|
|
84,895
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
12,328
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
9,770
|
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
26,442
|
|
|
|
52,122
|
|
|
|
98,436
|
|
|
|
72,670
|
|
|
|
30,935
|
|
|
|
56,556
|
|
|
|
77,453
|
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
96,180
|
|
|
|
141,372
|
|
|
|
115,076
|
|
|
|
85,525
|
|
|
|
61,191
|
|
|
|
44,307
|
|
|
|
66,848
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization natural gas
and crude oil
|
|
|
4,909
|
|
|
|
9,313
|
|
|
|
26,321
|
|
|
|
13,932
|
|
|
|
115,876
|
|
|
|
174,101
|
|
|
|
217,013
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization other
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
29,305
|
|
|
|
22,106
|
|
|
|
36,545
|
|
|
|
22,106
|
|
|
|
29,701
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,554
|
|
|
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
55,634
|
|
|
|
32,024
|
|
|
|
45,781
|
|
|
|
38,126
|
|
|
|
67,629
|
|
Loss (gain) on derivative contracts
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
(12,291
|
)
|
|
|
(16,176
|
)
|
|
|
(55,228
|
)
|
|
|
(107,039
|
)
|
|
|
(111,998
|
)
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(1,704
|
)
|
|
|
(851
|
)
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
155,245
|
|
|
|
253,640
|
|
|
|
351,261
|
|
|
|
233,436
|
|
|
|
323,431
|
|
|
|
293,894
|
|
|
|
440,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
20,750
|
|
|
|
34,053
|
|
|
|
36,981
|
|
|
|
29,741
|
|
|
|
138,344
|
|
|
|
145,663
|
|
|
|
124,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
5,236
|
|
|
|
5,984
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
|
(5,277
|
)
|
|
|
(16,904
|
)
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
(88,630
|
)
|
|
|
(59,774
|
)
|
|
|
(74,056
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
Income (loss) from equity investments
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(1,920
|
)
|
|
|
(6,192
|
)
|
|
|
(15,124
|
)
|
|
|
(3,883
|
)
|
|
|
(81,351
|
)
|
|
|
(54,668
|
)
|
|
|
(67,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
18,830
|
|
|
|
27,861
|
|
|
|
21,857
|
|
|
|
25,858
|
|
|
|
56,993
|
|
|
|
90,995
|
|
|
|
57,678
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
9,968
|
|
|
|
6,236
|
|
|
|
6,931
|
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
|
|
33,668
|
|
|
|
21,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
12,397
|
|
|
|
17,893
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
|
|
18,927
|
|
|
|
35,991
|
|
|
|
57,327
|
|
|
|
36,337
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
25,392
|
|
|
|
18,122
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
|
|
18,927
|
|
|
|
35,991
|
|
|
|
57,327
|
|
|
|
36,337
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,573
|
|
|
|
27,155
|
|
|
|
40,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) available (applicable) to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
25,392
|
|
|
$
|
18,122
|
|
|
$
|
11,654
|
|
|
$
|
18,927
|
|
|
$
|
5,418
|
|
|
$
|
30,172
|
|
|
$
|
(3,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain on acquisition
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share available (applicable) to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding(2):
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,559
|
|
|
|
73,727
|
|
|
|
71,692
|
|
|
|
102,562
|
|
|
|
122,429
|
|
|
|
122,426
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain on acquisition
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share available (applicable) to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of outstanding shares(2):
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,737
|
|
|
|
74,664
|
|
|
|
72,633
|
|
|
|
103,778
|
|
|
|
123,370
|
|
|
|
123,363
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We recognized an extraordinary gain from the recognition of the
excess of fair value over acquisition cost of $12.5 million
related to an acquisition we made in 2004. |
|
(2) |
|
The number of shares has been adjusted to reflect a
281.552-to-1
stock split in December 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
At September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
45,731
|
|
|
$
|
38,948
|
|
|
$
|
32,013
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
337,881
|
|
|
$
|
2,134,718
|
|
|
$
|
2,889,495
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
458,683
|
|
|
$
|
2,388,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,170,456
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
43,133
|
|
|
$
|
1,066,831
|
|
|
$
|
1,451,504
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
439,643
|
|
|
$
|
450,356
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
289,002
|
|
|
$
|
649,818
|
|
|
$
|
965,123
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
458,683
|
|
|
$
|
2,388,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,170,456
|
|
10
Summary
Historical Operating and Reserve Data
The following historical estimates of net proved natural gas and
oil reserves are based on reserve reports dated
December 31, 2005 and 2006 and June 30, 2007,
substantially all of which were prepared by our independent
petroleum engineers. You should refer to Risk
Factors, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and
Business Exploration and Production in
evaluating the material presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Estimated Proved Reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf)(2)
|
|
|
237.4
|
|
|
|
850.7
|
|
|
|
967.6
|
|
Oil (MmBbls)
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
Total (Bcfe)
|
|
|
300.0
|
|
|
|
1,001.8
|
|
|
|
1,174.0
|
|
PV-10 (in
millions)
|
|
$
|
733.3
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
1,734.3
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
2,558.8
|
(3)
|
Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows (in
millions)(4)
|
|
$
|
499.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,440.2
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our estimated proved reserves and the future net revenues,
PV-10, and
Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows were
determined using end of the period prices for natural gas and
oil that we realized as of December 31, 2005,
December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2007, which were
$8.40 per Mcf of natural gas and $54.04 per barrel of
oil at December 31, 2005, $5.64 per Mcf of natural gas
and $57.75 per barrel of oil at December 31, 2006 and
$6.70 per Mcf of natural gas and $63.78 per barrel of oil at
June 30, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Given the nature of our natural gas reserves, a significant
amount of our production, primarily in the WTO, contains natural
gas high in
CO2
content. These figures are net of volumes of
CO2
in excess of pipeline quality specifications. |
|
(3) |
|
PV-10 is a
non-GAAP financial measure and represents the present value of
estimated future cash inflows from proved natural gas and oil
reserves, less future development and production costs,
discounted at 10% per annum to reflect timing of future
cash flows and using pricing assumptions in effect at the end of
the period.
PV-10
differs from Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows
because it does not include the effects of income taxes and
other items on future net revenues. Neither
PV-10 nor
Standardized Measure represent an estimate of fair market value
of our natural gas and oil properties.
PV-10 is
used by the industry and by our management as an arbitrary
reserve asset value measure to compare against past reserve
bases and the reserve bases of other business entities that are
not dependent on the taxpaying status of the entity. |
|
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of our
Standardized Measure to
PV-10: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows
|
|
$
|
499.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,440.2
|
|
Present value of future income tax and other discounted at 10%
|
|
|
234.1
|
|
|
|
294.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PV-10
|
|
$
|
733.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,734.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows represents
the present value of estimated future cash inflows from proved
natural gas and oil reserves, less future development and
production costs, and income tax expenses, discounted at
10% per annum to reflect timing of future cash flows and
using the same pricing assumptions as were used to calculate
PV-10.
Standardized Measure differs from
PV-10
because Standardized Measure includes the effect of future
income taxes and other items. |
|
(5) |
|
Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows is only
calculated at fiscal year end under applicable accounting rules. |
11
The following tables set forth information regarding our net
production of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids and
certain price and cost information for each of the periods
indicated. Because of the relatively high volumes of
CO2
produced with natural gas in certain areas of the WTO, our
reported sales and reserves volumes and the related unit prices
received for natural gas in these areas are reported net of
CO2
volumes stripped at the gas plants. The gas plant fees for
removing
CO2
from our high
CO2
natural gas in the WTO have been taken into account in our lease
operating expenses as processing and gathering fees. In all
areas, natural gas sales are delivered to sales points with
CO2
levels within pipeline specifications and thus are included in
sales and reserves volumes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Production Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Mmcf)
|
|
|
6,708
|
|
|
|
6,873
|
|
|
|
13,410
|
|
|
|
6,856
|
|
|
|
35,148
|
|
Oil (MBbls)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
Combined Equivalent Volumes (Mmcfe)
|
|
|
6,930
|
|
|
|
7,305
|
|
|
|
15,342
|
|
|
|
7,275
|
|
|
|
43,793
|
|
Average Daily Combined Equivalent Volumes (Mmcfe/d)
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Average Prices(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
|
$
|
6.54
|
|
|
$
|
6.19
|
|
|
$
|
6.14
|
|
|
$
|
6.56
|
|
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$
|
34.03
|
|
|
$
|
48.19
|
|
|
$
|
56.61
|
|
|
$
|
61.89
|
|
|
$
|
61.67
|
|
Combined Equivalent (per Mcfe)
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
|
$
|
6.63
|
|
|
$
|
6.60
|
|
|
$
|
6.38
|
|
|
$
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reported prices represent actual prices for the periods
presented and do not give effect to hedging transactions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expenses per Mcfe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Processing and gathering(1)
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
Other lease operating expenses
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease operating expenses
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
|
|
$
|
2.97
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
.35
|
|
|
$
|
.28
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes costs attributable to gas treatment to remove
CO2
and other impurities from our high
CO2
natural gas. |
12
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully consider the following risks and all
of the other information contained in this prospectus before
deciding to invest in our common stock.
Risks
Related to the Natural Gas and Oil Industry and Our
Business
Natural
gas and oil prices are volatile, and a decline in natural gas
and oil prices can significantly affect our financial results
and impede our growth.
Our revenue, profitability and cash flow depend upon the prices
and demand for natural gas and oil. The markets for these
commodities are very volatile. Even relatively modest drops in
prices can significantly affect our financial results and impede
our growth. Changes in natural gas and oil prices have a
significant impact on the value of our reserves and on our cash
flow. Prices for natural gas and oil may fluctuate widely in
response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand
for natural gas and oil and a variety of additional factors that
are beyond our control, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the domestic and foreign supply of natural gas and oil;
|
|
|
|
the price of foreign imports;
|
|
|
|
worldwide economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
political and economic conditions in oil producing countries,
including the Middle East and South America;
|
|
|
|
the ability of members of the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries to agree to and maintain oil price and
production controls;
|
|
|
|
the level of consumer product demand;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
technological advances affecting energy consumption;
|
|
|
|
availability of pipeline infrastructure, treating,
transportation and refining capacity;
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes; and
|
|
|
|
the price and availability of alternative fuels.
|
Lower natural gas and oil prices may not only decrease our
revenues on a per share basis, but also may reduce the amount of
natural gas and oil that we can produce economically. This may
result in our having to make substantial downward adjustments to
our estimated proved reserves.
Our
estimated reserves are based on many assumptions that may turn
out to be inaccurate. Any significant inaccuracies in these
reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will materially
affect the quantities and present value of our
reserves.
The process of estimating natural gas and oil reserves is
complex and inherently imprecise. It requires interpretations of
available technical data and many assumptions, including
assumptions relating to production rates and economic factors
such as natural gas and oil prices, drilling and operating
expenses, capital expenditures and availability of funds. Any
significant inaccuracies in these interpretations or assumptions
could materially affect the estimated quantities and present
value of reserves shown in this prospectus. See
Business Our Business and Primary
Operations for information about our natural gas and oil
reserves.
Actual future production, natural gas and oil prices, revenues,
taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses and
quantities of recoverable natural gas and oil reserves most
likely will vary from our estimates. Any significant variance
could materially affect the estimated quantities and present
value of reserves shown in this prospectus. In addition, we may
adjust estimates of proved reserves to reflect production
history, results
13
of exploration and development, prevailing natural gas and oil
prices and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
The
present value of future net cash flows from our proved reserves
will not necessarily be the same as the current market value of
our estimated natural gas and oil reserves.
We base the estimated discounted future net cash flows from our
proved reserves on prices and costs in effect on the day of
estimate. Actual future net cash flows from our natural gas and
oil properties also will be affected by factors such as:
|
|
|
|
|
actual prices we receive for natural gas and oil;
|
|
|
|
actual cost of development and production expenditures;
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of actual production;
|
|
|
|
supply of and demand for natural gas and oil; and
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or taxation.
|
The timing of both our production and our incurrence of expenses
in connection with the development and production of natural gas
and oil properties will affect the timing of actual future net
cash flows from proved reserves, and thus their actual present
value. In addition, the 10% discount factor we use when
calculating discounted future net cash flows may not be the most
appropriate discount factor based on interest rates in effect
from time to time and risks associated with us or the natural
gas and oil industry in general.
Unless
we replace our natural gas and oil reserves, our reserves and
production will decline, which would adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our future natural gas and oil reserves and production, and
therefore our cash flow and income, are highly dependent on our
success in efficiently developing and exploiting our current
reserves and economically finding or acquiring additional
recoverable reserves. We may not be able to develop, find or
acquire additional reserves to replace our current and future
production at acceptable costs.
Our
potential drilling location inventories are scheduled over
several years, making them susceptible to uncertainties that
could materially alter the occurrence or timing of their
drilling.
As of June 30, 2007, only 699 of our 4,573 identified
potential future well locations were attributable to proved
undeveloped reserves. These potential drilling locations,
including those without proved undeveloped reserves, represent a
significant part of our growth strategy. Our ability to drill
and develop these locations is subject to a number of
uncertainties, including the availability of capital, seasonal
conditions, regulatory approvals, natural gas and oil prices,
costs and drilling results. Because of these uncertainties, we
do not know if the numerous potential drilling locations we have
will ever be drilled or if we will be able to produce natural
gas or oil from these or any other potential drilling locations.
As such, our actual drilling activities may materially differ
from our current expectations, which could adversely affect our
business.
We
will not know conclusively prior to drilling whether natural gas
or oil will be present in sufficient quantities to be
economically viable.
We describe some of our current prospects and drilling locations
and our plans to explore those prospects and drilling locations
in this prospectus. A prospect is a property on which we have
identified what our geoscientists believe, based on available
seismic and geological information, to be indications of natural
gas or oil. Our prospects and drilling locations are in various
stages of evaluation, ranging from a prospect that is ready to
drill to a prospect that will require substantial additional
seismic data processing and interpretation. The use of seismic
data and other technologies and the study of producing fields in
the same area will not enable us to know conclusively prior to
drilling whether oil or natural gas will be present or, if
present, whether oil or natural gas will be present in
sufficient quantities to be economically viable. Even if
sufficient amounts of oil or natural gas exist, we may damage
the potentially productive hydrocarbon bearing formation
14
or experience mechanical difficulties while drilling or
completing the well, resulting in a reduction in production from
the well or abandonment of the well. From January 1, 2007
through September 30, 2007, we participated in drilling a
total of 189 gross wells, of which six have been identified
as a dry hole. If we drill additional wells that we identify as
dry holes in our current and future prospects, our drilling
success rate may decline and materially harm our business. In
sum, the cost of drilling, completing and operating any well is
often uncertain, and new wells may not be productive.
Properties
that we buy may not produce as projected, and we may be unable
to determine reserve potential, identify liabilities associated
with the properties or obtain protection from sellers against
them.
Our reviews of properties we acquire are inherently incomplete
because it generally is not feasible to review in depth every
individual property involved in each acquisition. Even a
detailed review of records and properties may not necessarily
reveal existing or potential problems, nor will it permit a
buyer to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to
assess fully their deficiencies and potential. Inspections may
not always be performed on every well, and environmental
problems, such as soil or ground water contamination, are not
necessarily observable even when an inspection is undertaken.
Even when problems are identified, we often assume certain
environmental and other risks and liabilities in connection with
acquired properties, which risks and liabilities could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
The
development of the proved undeveloped reserves in the WTO and
other areas of operation may take longer and may require higher
levels of capital expenditures than we currently
anticipate.
Approximately 66% of the estimated proved reserves that we own
or have under lease in the WTO as of June 30, 2007 are
proved undeveloped reserves and 62% of our total reserves are
proved undeveloped reserves. Development of these reserves may
take longer and require higher levels of capital expenditures
than we currently anticipate. Therefore, ultimate recoveries
from these fields may not match current expectations. Delays in
the development of our reserves or increases in costs to drill
and develop such reserves will reduce the
PV-10 value
of our estimated proved undeveloped reserves and future net
revenues estimated for such reserves.
A
significant portion of our operations are located in WTO, making
us vulnerable to risks associated with operating in one major
geographic area.
As of June 30, 2007, approximately 55% of our proved
reserves and approximately 40% of our production were located in
the WTO. In addition, a substantial portion of our WTO natural
gas contains a high concentration of
CO2
and requires treating. As a result, we may be disproportionately
exposed to the impact of delays or interruptions of production
from these wells caused by transportation and treatment capacity
constraints, curtailment of production or treatment plant
closures for scheduled maintenance or unanticipated occurrences.
Many
of our prospects in the WTO may contain natural gas that is high
in
CO2
content, which can negatively affect our
economics.
The reservoirs of many of our prospects in the WTO may contain
natural gas that is high in
CO2
content. The natural gas produced from these reservoirs must be
treated for the removal of
CO2
prior to marketing. If we cannot obtain sufficient capacity at
treatment facilities for our natural gas with a high
CO2
concentration, or if the cost to obtain such capacity
significantly increases, we could be forced to delay production
and development or experience increased production costs.
Furthermore, when we treat the gas for the removal of
CO2,
some of the methane is used to run the treatment plant as fuel
gas and other methane and heavier hydrocarbons, such as ethane,
propane and butane, cannot be separated from the
CO2
and is lost. This is known as plant shrink. Historically our
plant shrink has been approximately 14% in the WTO. We do not
know the amount of
CO2
we will encounter in any well until it is drilled. As a result,
sometimes we encounter
CO2
levels in our wells that are higher than expected. The
15
amount of
CO2
in the gas produced affects the heating content of the gas. For
example, if a well is 65%
CO2,
the gas produced often has a heating content of between 300 and
350 MBtu per Mcf. Giving consideration for plant shrink, as
many as four Mcf of high
CO2
gas must be produced to sell one MmBtu of natural gas. We report
our volumes of natural gas reserves and production net of
CO2
volumes that are removed prior to sales. Since the treatment
expenses are incurred on an Mcf basis, we will incur a higher
effective treating cost per MmBtu of natural gas sold for
natural gas with a higher
CO2
content. As a result, high
CO2
gas wells must produce at much higher rates than low
CO2
gas wells to be economic, especially in a low natural gas price
environment.
We may
experience difficulty in staffing and retaining employees on our
new drilling rigs, which may adversely affect the efficiency of
our drilling program.
We have increased our number of drilling rigs and the level of
our activity substantially. This has required us to add
additional employees to staff our drilling rigs and to add
professional and support staff to other departments. If we are
unable to retain these employees, we may experience decreased
efficiency and delays in our drilling program.
A
significant decrease in natural gas production in our areas of
midstream gas services operation, due to the decline in
production from existing wells, depressed commodity prices or
otherwise, would adversely affect our revenues and cash flow for
our midstream gas services segment.
The profitability of our midstream business is materially
impacted by the volume of natural gas we gather, transmit and
process at our facilities. Most of the reserves backing up our
midstream assets are operated by our exploration and production
segment. A material decrease in natural gas production in our
areas of operation would result in a decline in the volume of
natural gas delivered to our pipelines and facilities for
gathering, transmitting and processing. The effect of such a
material decrease would be to reduce our revenues, operating
income and cash flows. Fluctuations in energy prices can greatly
affect production rates and investments by our exploration and
production business and third-parties in the development of new
natural gas and oil reserves. Drilling activity generally
decreases as natural gas and oil prices decrease. We have no
control over factors affecting production activity, including
prevailing and projected energy prices, demand for hydrocarbons,
the level of reserves, geological considerations, governmental
regulation and the availability and cost of capital. Failure to
connect new wells to our gathering systems would, therefore,
result in the amount of natural gas we gather, transmit and
process being reduced substantially over time and could, upon
exhaustion of the current wells, cause us to abandon our
gathering systems and, possibly cease gathering, transmission
and processing operations. Our ability to connect to new wells
will be dependent on the level of drilling activity in our areas
of operations and competitive market factors. As a consequence
of these declines, our revenues and cash flows could be
materially adversely affected.
Our
use of 2-D
and 3-D
seismic data is subject to interpretation and may not accurately
identify the presence of natural gas and oil, which could
adversely affect the results of our drilling
operations.
A significant aspect of our exploration and development plan
involves seismic data. Even when properly used and interpreted,
2-D and
3-D seismic
data and visualization techniques are only tools used to assist
geoscientists in identifying subsurface structures and
hydrocarbon indicators and do not enable the interpreter to know
whether hydrocarbons are present in those structures. Other
geologists and petroleum professionals, when studying the same
seismic data, may have significantly different interpretations
than our professionals. In addition, the use of
2-D and
3-D seismic
and other advanced technologies requires greater predrilling
expenditures than traditional drilling strategies, and we could
incur losses due to such expenditures. As a result, our drilling
activities may not be geologically successful or economical, and
our overall drilling success rate or our drilling success rate
for activities in a particular area may not improve.
We often gather
2-D and
3-D seismic
data over large areas. Our interpretation of seismic data
delineates for us those portions of an area that we believe are
desirable for drilling. Therefore, we may choose not to acquire
option or lease rights prior to acquiring seismic data, and in
many cases, we may identify hydrocarbon indicators before
seeking option or lease rights in the location. If we are not
able to lease those locations on
16
acceptable terms, it would result in our having made substantial
expenditures to acquire and analyze
2-D and
3-D data
without having an opportunity to attempt to benefit from those
expenditures.
Drilling
for and producing natural gas and oil are high risk activities
with many uncertainties that could adversely affect our
business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Our drilling and operating activities are subject to many risks,
including the risk that we will not discover commercially
productive reservoirs. Drilling for natural gas and oil can be
unprofitable, not only from dry holes, but from productive wells
that do not produce sufficient revenues to return a profit. In
addition, our drilling and producing operations may be
curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of other factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
unusual or unexpected geological formations and miscalculations;
|
|
|
|
pressures;
|
|
|
|
fires;
|
|
|
|
blowouts;
|
|
|
|
loss of drilling fluid circulation;
|
|
|
|
title problems;
|
|
|
|
facility or equipment malfunctions;
|
|
|
|
unexpected operational events;
|
|
|
|
shortages of skilled personnel;
|
|
|
|
shortages or delivery delays of equipment and services;
|
|
|
|
compliance with environmental and other regulatory
requirements; and
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions.
|
Any of these risks can cause substantial losses, including
personal injury or loss of life; damage to or destruction of
property, natural resources and equipment; pollution;
environmental contamination or loss of wells; and regulatory
fines or penalties.
Insurance against all operational risks is not available to us.
Additionally, we may elect not to obtain insurance if we believe
that the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to
the perceived risks presented. We do not carry environmental
insurance, thus, losses could occur for uninsurable or uninsured
risks or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage.
The occurrence of an event that is not covered in full or in
part by insurance could have a material adverse impact on our
business activities, financial condition and results of
operations.
Market
conditions or operational impediments may hinder our access to
natural gas and oil markets or delay our
production.
Market conditions or a lack of satisfactory natural gas and oil
transportation arrangements may hinder our access to natural gas
and oil markets or delay our production. The availability of a
ready market for our natural gas and oil production depends on a
number of factors, including the demand for and supply of
natural gas and oil and the proximity of reserves to pipelines
and terminal facilities. Our ability to market our production
depends in substantial part on the availability and capacity of
gathering systems, pipelines and processing facilities. For
example, we are currently experiencing capacity limitations in
the Piñon Field. Our failure to obtain such services on
acceptable terms or expand our midstream assets could materially
harm our business. We may be required to shut in wells for a
lack of a market or because access to natural gas pipelines,
gathering system capacity or processing facilities may be
limited or unavailable. If that were to occur, then we would be
unable to realize revenue from those wells until production
arrangements were made to deliver the production to market.
17
Our
development and exploration operations require substantial
capital and we may be unable to obtain needed capital or
financing on satisfactory terms, which could lead to a loss of
properties and a decline in our natural gas and oil
reserves.
The natural gas and oil industry is capital intensive. We make
and expect to continue to make substantial capital expenditures
in our business and operations for the exploration, development,
production and acquisition of natural gas and oil reserves. To
date, we have financed capital expenditures primarily with
proceeds from the sale of equity, bank borrowings and cash
generated by operations. We intend to finance our future capital
expenditures with the sale of equity, asset sales, cash flow
from operations and current and new financing arrangements. Our
cash flow from operations and access to capital are subject to a
number of variables, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our proved reserves;
|
|
|
|
the level of natural gas and oil we are able to produce from
existing wells;
|
|
|
|
the prices at which natural gas and oil are sold; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to acquire, locate and produce new reserves.
|
If our revenues decrease as a result of lower natural gas and
oil prices, operating difficulties, declines in reserves or for
any other reason, we may have limited ability to obtain the
capital necessary to sustain our operations at current levels.
In order to fund our capital expenditures, we must seek
additional financing. Our senior credit facility and term loan
contain covenants restricting our ability to incur additional
indebtedness without the consent of the lenders. Our lenders may
withhold this consent in their sole discretion.
In addition, we may not be able to obtain debt or equity
financing on terms favorable to us, or at all. The failure to
obtain additional financing could result in a curtailment of our
operations relating to exploration and development of our
prospects, which in turn could lead to a possible loss of
properties and a decline in our natural gas and oil reserves.
We
have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which may adversely
affect our cash flow and our ability to operate our
business.
As of September 30, 2007, our total indebtedness was
$1.5 billion, which represented approximately 51% of our
total capitalization. Our substantial level of indebtedness
increases the possibility that we may be unable to generate cash
sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of, interest on or
other amounts due in respect of our indebtedness. Our
substantial indebtedness, combined with our lease and other
financial obligations and contractual commitments, could have
other important consequences to you. For example, it could:
|
|
|
|
|
make us more vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic,
industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in
government regulation;
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
reducing the availability of our cash flows to fund working
capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general
corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business and the industry in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that are less leveraged and, therefore, may be able
to take advantage of opportunities that our leverage prevents us
from pursuing; and
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional amounts for working
capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service
requirements, execution of our business strategy or other
purposes.
|
Any of the above listed factors could materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
18
Our
senior credit facility and term loan have restrictions and
financial covenants which could adversely affect our
operations.
We will depend on our senior credit facility for a portion of
future capital needs. The senior credit facility and term loan
restrict our ability to obtain additional financing, make
investments, lease equipment, sell assets and engage in business
combinations. We also are required to comply with certain
financial covenants and ratios. Our ability to comply with these
restrictions and covenants in the future is uncertain and will
be affected by the levels of cash flow from our operations and
events or circumstances beyond our control. Our failure to
comply with any of the restrictions and covenants under the
senior credit facility, term loan or other debt financing could
result in a default under those facilities, which could cause
all of our existing indebtedness to be immediately due and
payable.
The senior credit facility limits the amounts we can borrow to a
borrowing base amount, determined by the lender in its sole
discretion on a semi-annual basis, based upon projected revenues
from the natural gas and oil properties securing our loan. The
lender can unilaterally adjust the borrowing base and the
borrowings permitted to be outstanding under the senior credit
facility, and any increase in the borrowing base requires its
consent. Outstanding borrowings in excess of the borrowing base
must be repaid immediately, or we must pledge other natural gas
and oil properties as additional collateral. We do not currently
have any substantial unpledged properties, and we may not have
the financial resources in the future to make any mandatory
principal prepayments required under the senior credit facility.
Our
derivative activities could result in financial losses or could
reduce our earnings.
To achieve a more predictable cash flow and to reduce our
exposure to adverse fluctuations in the prices of natural gas
and oil, we currently, and may in the future, enter into
derivative instruments for a portion of our natural gas and oil
production, including collars and price-fix swaps. We have not
designated any of our derivative instruments as hedges for
accounting purposes and record all derivative instruments on our
balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of our
derivative instruments are recognized in current earnings.
Accordingly, our earnings may fluctuate significantly as a
result of changes in fair value of our derivative instruments.
Derivative instruments also expose us to the risk of financial
loss in some circumstances, including when:
|
|
|
|
|
production is less than expected;
|
|
|
|
the counter-party to the derivative instrument defaults on its
contract obligations; or
|
|
|
|
there is a change in the expected differential between the
underlying price in the derivative instrument and actual prices
received.
|
In addition, these types of derivative arrangements limit the
benefit we would receive from increases in the prices for
natural gas and oil and may expose us to cash margin
requirements.
Competition
in the natural gas and oil industry is intense, which may
adversely affect our ability to succeed.
The natural gas and oil industry is intensely competitive, and
we compete with companies that have greater resources. Many of
these companies not only explore for and produce natural gas and
oil, but also carry on refining operations and market petroleum
and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis.
These companies may be able to pay more for productive natural
gas and oil properties and exploratory prospects or identify,
evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties
and prospects than our financial or human resources permit. In
addition, these companies may have a greater ability to continue
exploration activities during periods of low natural gas and oil
market prices. Our larger competitors may be able to absorb the
burden of present and future federal, state, local and other
laws and regulations more easily than we can, which would
adversely affect our competitive position. Our ability to
acquire additional properties and to discover reserves in the
future will be dependent upon our ability to evaluate and select
suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly
competitive environment. In addition, because
19
we have fewer financial and human resources than many companies
in our industry, we may be at a disadvantage in bidding for
exploratory prospects and producing natural gas and oil
properties.
Downturns in natural gas and oil prices can result in decreased
oil field activity which, in turn, can result in an oversupply
of service providers and drilling rigs. This oversupply can
result in severe reductions in prices received for oil field
services or a complete lack of work for crews and equipment.
We are
subject to complex federal, state, local and other laws and
regulations that could adversely affect the cost, manner or
feasibility of conducting our operations.
Our natural gas and oil exploration, production, transportation
and treatment operations are subject to complex and stringent
laws and regulations. In order to conduct our operations in
compliance with these laws and regulations, we must obtain and
maintain numerous permits, approvals and certificates from
various federal, state and local governmental authorities. We
may incur substantial costs in order to maintain compliance with
these existing laws and regulations. In addition, our costs of
compliance may increase if existing laws and regulations are
revised or reinterpreted, or if new laws and regulations become
applicable to our operations. For instance, we may be unable to
obtain all necessary permits, approvals and certificates for
proposed projects. Alternatively, we may have to incur
substantial expenditures to obtain, maintain or renew
authorizations to conduct existing projects. If a project is
unable to function as planned due to changing requirements or
public opposition, we may suffer expensive delays, extended
periods of non-operation or significant loss of value in a
project. All such costs may have a negative effect on our
business and results of operations.
Our business is subject to federal, state and local laws and
regulations as interpreted and enforced by governmental agencies
and other bodies vested with much authority relating to the
exploration for, and the development, production and
transportation of, natural gas and oil. Failure to comply with
such laws and regulations, as interpreted and enforced, could
have a material adverse effect on us. For instance, the
U.S. Department of the Interiors Minerals Management
Service (MMS), may suspend or terminate our
operations on federal leases for failure to pay royalties or
comply with safety and environmental regulations.
Our
operations expose us to potentially substantial costs and
liabilities with respect to environmental, health and safety
matters.
We may incur substantial costs and liabilities as a result of
environmental, health and safety requirements applicable to our
natural gas and oil exploration, development, production,
transportation, treatment, and other activities. These costs and
liabilities could arise under a wide range of environmental,
health and safety laws, that cover, among other things,
emissions into the air and water, habitat and endangered species
protection, the containment and disposal of hazardous
substances, oil field waste and other waste materials, the use
of underground injection wells, and wetlands protection. These
laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have
tended to become increasingly strict over time. Failure to
comply with environmental, health and safety laws or regulations
may result in assessment of administrative, civil, and criminal
penalties, imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs and
liens, and the issuance of orders enjoining or limiting our
current or future operations. Compliance with these laws and
regulations also increases the cost of our operations and may
prevent or delay the commencement or continuance of a given
operation. Specifically, we may incur increased expenditures in
the future in order to maintain compliance with laws and
regulations governing emissions of air pollutants from our
natural gas treatment plants. See Business
Environmental Matters and Regulation.
Under certain environmental laws that impose strict, joint and
several liability we may be required to remediate our
contaminated properties regardless of whether such contamination
resulted from the conduct of others or from consequences of our
own actions that were or were not in compliance with all
applicable laws at the time those actions were taken. In
addition, claims for damages to persons or property may result
from environmental and other impacts of our operations.
Moreover, new or modified environmental, health or safety laws,
regulations or enforcement policies could be more stringent and
impose unforeseen liabilities or significantly increase
compliance costs. Therefore, the costs to comply with
environmental, health or safety
20
laws or regulations or the liabilities incurred in connection
with them could significantly and adversely affect our business,
financial condition or results of operations. In addition, many
countries as well as several states of the U.S. have agreed to
regulate emissions of greenhouse gases. Methane, a
primary component of natural gas, and carbon dioxide, a
byproduct of burning of natural gas and oil are greenhouse
gases. Regulation of greenhouse gases could adversely impact
some of our operations and demand for some of our services or
products in the future. See Business
Environmental Matters and Regulation.
The
inability of one or more of our customers to meet their
obligations may adversely affect our financial
results.
Substantially all of our accounts receivable for natural gas and
oil sales, drilling and oil field services and midstream gas
services result from billings to third-parties in the energy
industry. This concentration of customers and joint interest
owners may impact our overall credit risk in that these entities
may be similarly affected by changes in economic and other
conditions. In addition, our natural gas and oil derivative
arrangements expose us to credit risk in the event of
nonperformance by counterparties.
We
have identified a material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting. If additional material weaknesses are
detected or if we fail to maintain an adequate system of
internal control over financial reporting this could adversely
affect our ability to accurately report our
results.
We are not currently required to comply with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, and are therefore not required to
make an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls
over financial reporting for that purpose. As disclosed
elsewhere in this prospectus and in Note 1 to our consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus, we have
restated our consolidated financial statements for our December
31, 2006 year end. We have considered the internal control over
financial reporting implications of the error which resulted in
the restatement of our consolidated financial statements and
determined a material weakness existed as it relates to
financial reporting process and accounting for derivatives. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Restatement of
Previously Issued Financial Statements Correction of
an Accounting Error.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
material weakness is a control deficiency or a combination of
control deficiencies, that results in a more than remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide
reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. If we
cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our
reputation and operating results would be harmed. Our efforts to
develop and maintain our internal controls may not be
successful, and we may be unable to maintain adequate controls
over our financial processes and reporting in the future,
including future compliance with the obligations under Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We will be required to
comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
effective as of December 31, 2008. Any failure to develop or
maintain effective controls, or difficulties encountered in
their implementation or other effective improvement of our
internal controls could harm our operating results. Ineffective
internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence
in our reported financial information.
Risks
Related to Our Common Stock
A
significant portion of our outstanding shares of common stock
may be sold into the market in the near future. This could cause
the market price of our common stock to drop
significantly.
As of November 30, 2007, we had outstanding
141,845,661 shares of common stock. In addition,
22,275,871 shares of common stock will be issuable upon
conversion of our outstanding convertible preferred stock. Of
these shares, the 53,595,665 shares the selling
stockholders are selling in this offering will be freely
21
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act except for
any shares purchased by one of our affiliates as
defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
The resale of these shares in the future could cause the market
price of our stock to drop significantly.
The
market price for shares of our common stock may be highly
volatile and could be subject to wide
fluctuations.
The market price for shares of our common stock may be highly
volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations, even if an
active trading market develops. Some of the factors that could
negatively affect our share price include:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in our reserve estimates and
quarterly operating results;
|
|
|
|
liquidity and the registration of our common stock for public
resale;
|
|
|
|
sales of our common stock by our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
changes in natural gas and oil prices;
|
|
|
|
changes in our cash flows from operations or earnings estimates;
|
|
|
|
publication of research reports about us or the exploration and
production industry generally;
|
|
|
|
increases in market interest rates which may increase our cost
of capital;
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable laws or regulations, court rulings and
enforcement and legal actions;
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
|
|
|
|
adverse market reaction to any increased indebtedness we incur
in the future;
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key management personnel;
|
|
|
|
actions by our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
speculation in the press or investment community regarding our
business;
|
|
|
|
large volume of sellers of our common stock pursuant to our
resale registration statement with a relatively small volume of
purchasers;
|
|
|
|
general market and economic conditions; and
|
|
|
|
domestic and international economic, legal and regulatory
factors unrelated to our performance.
|
We do
not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future.
We do not expect to declare or pay any cash or other dividends
in the foreseeable future on our common stock, as we intend to
use cash flow generated by operations to expand our business.
Our senior credit facility and term loan restrict our ability to
pay cash dividends on our common stock, and we may also enter
into credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the
future that restrict our ability to declare or pay cash
dividends on our common stock. In addition, the certificate of
designation for our convertible preferred stock prohibits the
payment of dividends to holders of our common stock without the
consent of holders of a majority of our outstanding convertible
preferred stock.
You
may experience dilution of your ownership interests due to the
future issuance of additional shares of our common
stock.
We may in the future issue our previously authorized and
unissued securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership
interests of our present stockholders and purchasers of common
stock offered hereby. As of September 30, 2007, we were
authorized to issue 400 million shares of common stock and
50 million shares of preferred stock with preferences and
rights as determined by our Board of Directors. As of
November 30, 2007, we had 141,854,661 shares of common
stock outstanding and pursuant to our stock incentive plan, we
have also reserved approximately 2.2 million shares of our
common stock for future issuance as restricted stock, stock
options or other equity-based grants to employees and directors.
We may also issue additional shares of our common stock or other
securities that are convertible into or exercisable for common
stock in connection with the hiring of personnel, future
acquisitions, future private placements of our securities for
22
capital raising purposes or for other business purposes. We have
2,184,287 shares of convertible preferred stock
outstanding, which may be converted into 22,275,871 shares
of common stock at any time by the holders of such preferred
stock or by us at any time following May 7, 2008 upon
satisfaction of other conditions. See Description of
Capital Stock Preferred Stock
Convertible Preferred Stock. The potential issuance or
sale of additional shares of common stock may create downward
pressure on the trading price of our common stock.
Our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as Delaware
law, contain provisions that could discourage acquisition bids
or merger proposals, which may adversely affect the market price
of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of
directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval.
If our board of directors elects to issue preferred stock, it
could be more difficult for a third party to acquire us. In
addition, some provisions of our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party to
acquire control of us, even if the change of control would be
beneficial to our stockholders, including:
|
|
|
|
|
a classified board of directors, so that only approximately
one-third of our directors are elected each year;
|
|
|
|
limitations on the removal of directors;
|
|
|
|
the prohibition of stockholder action by written consent;
|
|
|
|
and limitations on the ability of our stockholders to call
special meetings and establish advance notice provisions for
stockholder proposals and nominations for elections to the board
of directors to be acted upon at meetings of stockholders.
|
Delaware law prohibits us from engaging in any business
combination with any interested stockholder, meaning
generally that a stockholder who beneficially owns more than 15%
of our stock cannot acquire us for a period of three years from
the date this person became an interested stockholder, unless
various conditions are met, such as approval of the transaction
by our board of directors.
23
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Various statements contained in this prospectus, including those
that express a belief, expectation, or intention, as well as
those that are not statements of historical fact, are
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements may
include projections and estimates concerning the timing and
success of specific projects and our future production,
revenues, income and capital spending. Our forward-looking
statements are generally accompanied by words such as
estimate, project, predict,
believe, expect, anticipate,
potential, could, may,
foresee, plan, goal or other
words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes.
The forward-looking statements in this prospectus speak only as
of the date of this prospectus; we disclaim any obligation to
update these statements unless required by securities law, and
we caution you not to rely on them unduly. We have based these
forward-looking statements on our current expectations and
assumptions about future events. While our management considers
these expectations and assumptions to be reasonable, they are
inherently subject to significant business, economic,
competitive, regulatory and other risks, contingencies and
uncertainties relating to, among other matters, the risks
discussed under the heading Risk Factors and the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the volatility of natural gas and oil prices;
|
|
|
|
discovery, estimation, development and replacement of natural
gas and oil reserves;
|
|
|
|
cash flow and liquidity;
|
|
|
|
financial position;
|
|
|
|
business strategy;
|
|
|
|
amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures, including
future development costs;
|
|
|
|
availability and terms of capital;
|
|
|
|
timing and amount of future production of natural gas and oil;
|
|
|
|
availability of drilling and production equipment;
|
|
|
|
timing of drilling rig fabrication and delivery;
|
|
|
|
customer contracting of drilling rigs;
|
|
|
|
availability of oil field labor;
|
|
|
|
availability and regulation of
CO2;
|
|
|
|
operating costs and other expenses;
|
|
|
|
prospect development and property acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
availability of pipeline infrastructure to transport natural gas
production;
|
|
|
|
marketing of natural gas and oil;
|
|
|
|
competition in the natural gas and oil industry;
|
|
|
|
governmental regulation and taxation of the natural gas and oil
industry; and
|
|
|
|
developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing
countries.
|
24
The selling stockholders will receive all of the proceeds from
any sales of our common stock pursuant to this registration
statement, and we will not receive any such proceeds. See
Selling Shareholders.
We do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends to
holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. We
currently intend to retain all available funds and any future
earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business,
including exploration, development and acquisition activities.
In addition, the terms of our revolving credit facility and term
loan restrict our ability to pay dividends to holders of common
stock. In addition, the certificate of designation for our
convertible preferred stock prohibits the payment of dividends
to holders of our common stock without the consent of holders of
a majority of our outstanding convertible preferred stock.
Accordingly, if our dividend policy were to change in the
future, our ability to pay dividends would be subject to these
restrictions and our then existing conditions, including our
results of operations, financial condition, contractual
obligations, capital requirements, business prospects and other
factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. In December
2003, we paid a cash dividend on our common stock in the amount
of $0.02 per share on the 56,312,400 shares then
outstanding.
25
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information reflects our historical results as adjusted on a pro
forma basis to give effect to the NEG acquisition and other 2006
acquisitions and the related financing transactions, which were
entered into in order to fund these transactions. The unaudited
pro forma condensed combined statements of operations
information for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 give effect to these
transactions as if they occurred on January 1, 2006. The
pro forma adjustments are based on available information and
assumptions that our management believes are reasonable and are
described in the related notes.
NEG
acquisition
We acquired all the outstanding membership interests of NEG on
November 21, 2006 for approximately $990.4 million in
cash, 12,842,000 shares of our common stock (valued at
approximately $231.2 million) and the assumption of
$300 million in debt, and received $21.1 million in
available cash. The cash requirements were funded from the
issuance of $550 million in preferred stock, common units
and additional banking arrangements.
Prior to our acquisition of NEG, NEG acquired the remaining 50%
membership interests in NEG Holding LLC that NEG did not already
own, and NEG distributed all of its 50.1% capital stock and
$148 million senior notes investment in National Energy
Group, Inc. (NEGI). As a result, we acquired 100% of
the membership interests in NEG Holding LLC and no interest in
NEGI.
Other
2006 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
Our acquisition in March 2006 from a former director and former
executive officer of additional equity interests in PetroSource
to increase our ownership percentage from 86.5% to 99% in
exchange for the extinguishment of subordinated debt of
approximately $1.0 million and a $4.5 million cash
payment for a total consideration of approximately
$5.5 million.
|
|
|
|
Our acquisition in May 2006 of working interests in WTO leases
for cash consideration of $40.9 million.
|
|
|
|
Our acquisition in May 2006 of working interests in leases in
WTO for $4.7 million of common stock at $18.50 per
share and cash of $8.2 million for a total consideration of
$12.9 million.
|
|
|
|
Our acquisition in June 2006 from a former director and former
executive officer of additional working interests in WTO leases
in which we already held interests in exchange for cash
consideration of $9.0 million.
|
|
|
|
Our acquisition in June 2006 of the remaining 1% equity interest
in PetroSource in exchange for common stock of $0.5 million
at $17.25 per share.
|
The historical statement of operations information for the year
ended December 31, 2006 is derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements. The historical statement of
operations information for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 is derived from our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements. We have provided the
historical information regarding us and our subsidiaries and the
assumptions and adjustments for the pro forma information.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
are presented for informational purposes only and are not
necessarily indicative of the combined results of operations
which would have been realized had the transactions been
effective for the period presented or the combined results of
operations of SandRidge and its subsidiaries (including the
entities to be acquired in the NEG acquisition) in the future.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
for the period presented may have been different had the
transactions actually been completed during the period due to,
among other factors, those factors discussed in Risk
Factors.
You should read the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information in conjunction with our historical
financial statements and related notes and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in this
prospectus.
26
SandRidge
Energy, Inc.
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
SandRidge
|
|
|
|
SandRidge
|
|
|
(January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
November 21, 2006)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
388,242
|
|
|
$
|
253,832
|
|
|
$
|
(76,818
|
)(a)(b)
|
|
$
|
565,256
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
35,149
|
|
|
|
50,527
|
|
|
|
(781
|
)(a)(b)
|
|
|
84,895
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
|
|
5,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,770
|
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
98,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,983
|
)(a)
|
|
|
77,453
|
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
115,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,228
|
)(a)
|
|
|
66,848
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization natural gas
and crude oil
|
|
|
25,723
|
|
|
|
91,611
|
|
|
|
99,081
|
(a)(c)
|
|
|
216,415
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization other
|
|
|
29,903
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,299
|
|
General and administrative cost
|
|
|
55,634
|
|
|
|
16,566
|
|
|
|
(4,571
|
)(a)
|
|
|
67,629
|
|
Gain on derivative contracts
|
|
|
(12,291
|
)
|
|
|
(99,707
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,998
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
36,981
|
|
|
|
189,323
|
|
|
|
(101,336
|
)
|
|
|
124,968
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
4,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,984
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(16,904
|
)
|
|
|
(10,411
|
)
|
|
|
(46,741
|
)(d)
|
|
|
(74,056
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
(e)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
Income from equity investments
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision
|
|
|
21,857
|
|
|
|
183,787
|
|
|
|
(147,966
|
)
|
|
|
57,678
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
6,236
|
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
12,962
|
(f)
|
|
|
21,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
|
|
181,644
|
|
|
|
(160,928
|
)
|
|
|
36,337
|
|
Preferred dividends and accretion
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,207
|
(g)
|
|
|
40,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) available (applicable) to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
11,654
|
|
|
$
|
181,644
|
|
|
$
|
(197,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share available (applicable) to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in calculating earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
73,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,699
|
(h)(i)
|
|
|
122,426
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
74,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,699
|
(h)(i)
|
|
|
123,363
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information
27
SandRidge
Energy, Inc.
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA COMBINED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
SandRidge
|
|
|
|
SandRidge
|
|
|
2006 through
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
2006)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
263,177
|
|
|
$
|
239,613
|
|
|
$
|
(63,233
|
)(a)(b)
|
|
$
|
439,557
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
21,625
|
|
|
|
38,332
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)(a)(b)
|
|
|
59,863
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
4,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
72,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,114
|
)(a)
|
|
|
56,556
|
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
85,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,218
|
)(a)
|
|
|
44,307
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization natural gas
and crude oil
|
|
|
13,932
|
|
|
|
76,189
|
|
|
|
83,649
|
(a)(c)
|
|
|
173,770
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization other
|
|
|
22,106
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,437
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
32,024
|
|
|
|
10,281
|
|
|
|
(4,179
|
)(a)
|
|
|
38,126
|
|
Gain on derivative contracts
|
|
|
(16,176
|
)
|
|
|
(90,863
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,039
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(851
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
29,741
|
|
|
|
201,199
|
|
|
|
(85,277
|
)
|
|
|
145,663
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
4,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,236
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
(16,738
|
)
|
|
|
(38,946
|
)(d)
|
|
|
(59,774
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
(e)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
Income from equity investments
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision
|
|
|
25,858
|
|
|
|
189,249
|
|
|
|
(124,112
|
)
|
|
|
90,995
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
6,931
|
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
24,594
|
(f)
|
|
|
33,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
18,927
|
|
|
|
187,106
|
|
|
|
(148,706
|
)
|
|
|
57,327
|
|
Preferred dividend and accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,155
|
(g)
|
|
|
27,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
18,927
|
|
|
$
|
187,106
|
|
|
$
|
(175,861
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share available to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in calculating earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
71,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,737
|
(h)(i)
|
|
|
122,429
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
72,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,737
|
(h)(i)
|
|
|
123,370
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information
28
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Basis of
Presentation
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 give effect to the NEG
acquisition and the other 2006 acquisitions and the related
financing transactions as if they occurred on January 1,
2006.
NEGs combined financial statements include the accounts of
NEG and subsidiaries excluding NEGI, and the
103/4% Senior
Notes due from NEGI, but including NEGIs 50% membership
interest in NEG Holding LLC, from January 1, 2006 through
November 21, 2006, the date of the NEG acquisition for
purposes of the pro forma condensed combined statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 and
January 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 for
purposes of the pro forma condensed combined statement of
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 have been prepared
based on the following information:
(a) audited consolidated financial statements of SandRidge
and its subsidiaries as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006;
(b) unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
of SandRidge and its subsidiaries as of and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006; and
(c) other supplementary information we considered necessary
for the purpose of reflecting the transactions contemplated in
the pro forma combined financial statements.
We accounted for this acquisition using the purchase method of
accounting for business combinations. Under the purchase method
of accounting, we are deemed to be the acquirer for accounting
purposes based on a number of factors determined in accordance
with GAAP. The purchase method of accounting requires the assets
we acquired and liabilities we assumed to be recorded at their
estimated fair values.
For purposes of these pro forma condensed combined financial
statements, the presentation of certain historical NEG financial
information has been modified to conform to this pro forma
presentation.
Statement
of Operations Adjustments
(a) Reflects the pro forma elimination of activity between
us and NEG. We provided services to NEG as the operator of
certain oil and gas properties and also provided other services
to NEG.
(b) Reflects the increase in revenues and expenses related
to the other 2006 acquisitions of $5.2 million in revenues
and $1.5 million in production expenses. These acquisitions
were completed by September 30, 2006.
(c) Reflects a $97.0 million and $81.7 million
incremental increase in depletion expense resulting from the
step-up of
property, plant and equipment acquired based on the allocation
of the purchase price to the properties fair value at
December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006,
respectively. Adjustment assumes no material changes in the
estimated lives or amortization periods for acquired assets as a
result of the purchase price allocation.
(d) Reflects adjustment to increase interest expense for
the effect of the additional debt assumed from the merger and
the amounts borrowed as well as to recognize amortization
expense associated with our estimated debt issuance costs. The
interest rate used in the calculation of interest expense is
monthly LIBOR plus 4.5%, the expected actual interest rates, and
the life used in the calculation of amortization expense is
based on the expected life of the new debt. If the actual
interest rate is
1/8%
more or less than the assumed rate, the interest
29
cost will increase or decrease by approximately
$0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and
$0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006.
(e) Reflects the net pro forma adjustment to minority
interest as a result of the acquisition of additional interests
in PetroSource in our financial statements.
(f) Reflects adjustment to income tax expense to reflect
total combined pro forma income tax expense at a 37% statutory
income tax rate as NEG was organized as a limited liability
company for the period presented, thus not subject to corporate
taxes.
(g) Reflects preferred dividends of 7.75% per annum
and accretion on convertible preferred stock.
(h) Reflects shares issued for the NEG and other 2006
acquisitions adjusted for the inclusion of weighted average
share amounts at December 31, 2006 and September 30,
2006.
Year ended December 31, 2006
Shares issued for the NEG and other 2006 acquisitions are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
NEG acquisition and related financing arrangements
|
|
|
18,174
|
|
Other 2006 acquisitions
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,453
|
|
Less: weighted shares included in historical results
|
|
|
(2,134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
Shares issued for the NEG and other 2006 acquisitions are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
NEG acquisition and related financing arrangements
|
|
|
18,174
|
|
Other 2006 acquisitions
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,453
|
|
Less: weighted shares included in historical results
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Reflects the issuance of 32,379,500 shares on
November 9, 2007.
30
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
Set forth below is our selected consolidated historical
financial data for the periods indicated. The historical
statement of operations data for the periods ended
December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and the
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004,
2005 and 2006 have been derived from our audited financial
statements. Our historical statement of operations data as of
and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007
are derived from our unaudited financial statements and, in our
opinion, have been prepared on the same basis as the audited
financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of
this information. You should read the following summary
financial data in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our historical and pro forma financial
statements and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003(1)
|
|
|
2004(2)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
59,247
|
|
|
$
|
155,337
|
|
|
$
|
175,995
|
|
|
$
|
287,693
|
|
|
$
|
388,242
|
|
|
$
|
263,177
|
|
|
$
|
461,775
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
7,949
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
10,230
|
|
|
|
16,195
|
|
|
|
35,149
|
|
|
|
21,625
|
|
|
|
77,707
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
12,328
|
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
8,858
|
|
|
|
13,847
|
|
|
|
26,442
|
|
|
|
52,122
|
|
|
|
98,436
|
|
|
|
72,670
|
|
|
|
30,935
|
|
Midstream marketing
|
|
|
23,689
|
|
|
|
94,620
|
|
|
|
96,180
|
|
|
|
141,372
|
|
|
|
115,076
|
|
|
|
85,525
|
|
|
|
61,191
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization natural gas
and crude oil
|
|
|
3,142
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
4,909
|
|
|
|
9,313
|
|
|
|
26,321
|
|
|
|
13,932
|
|
|
|
115,876
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization other
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
5,284
|
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
29,305
|
|
|
|
22,106
|
|
|
|
36,545
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,355
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
|
6,554
|
|
|
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
55,634
|
|
|
|
32,024
|
|
|
|
45,781
|
|
Loss (gain) on derivative contracts
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
|
|
3,450
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
(12,291
|
)
|
|
|
(16,176
|
)
|
|
|
(55,228
|
)
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,284
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(1,704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
54,278
|
|
|
|
132,999
|
|
|
|
155,245
|
|
|
|
253,640
|
|
|
|
351,261
|
|
|
|
233,436
|
|
|
|
323,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
4,969
|
|
|
|
22,338
|
|
|
|
20,750
|
|
|
|
34,053
|
|
|
|
36,981
|
|
|
|
29,741
|
|
|
|
138,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,208
|
)
|
|
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
|
(5,277
|
)
|
|
|
(16,904
|
)
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
(88,630
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
Income (loss) from equity investments
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
1,056
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(1,285
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(1,920
|
)
|
|
|
(6,192
|
)
|
|
|
(15,124
|
)
|
|
|
3,883
|
|
|
|
81,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
3,684
|
|
|
|
22,193
|
|
|
|
18,830
|
|
|
|
27,861
|
|
|
|
21,857
|
|
|
|
25,858
|
|
|
|
56,993
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
7,585
|
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
9,968
|
|
|
|
6,236
|
|
|
|
6,931
|
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,350
|
|
|
|
14,608
|
|
|
|
12,397
|
|
|
|
17,893
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
|
|
18,927
|
|
|
|
35,991
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,455
|
|
|
|
12,887
|
|
|
|
25,392
|
|
|
|
18,122
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
|
|
18,927
|
|
|
|
35,991
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) available (applicable) to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
3,455
|
|
|
$
|
12,887
|
|
|
$
|
25,392
|
|
|
$
|
18,122
|
|
|
$
|
11,654
|
|
|
$
|
18,927
|
|
|
$
|
5,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003(1)
|
|
|
2004(2)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of
income tax
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain on acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of
income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding(3):
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,559
|
|
|
|
73,727
|
|
|
|
71,692
|
|
|
|
102,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of
income tax
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain on acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of
income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding(3):
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,737
|
|
|
|
74,664
|
|
|
|
72,633
|
|
|
|
103,778
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We adopted the provisions of SFAS 143 Accounting for
Retirement Obligations, resulting in a cumulative effect
of change in accounting principal of $1.6 million. |
|
(2) |
|
We recognized an extraordinary gain from the recognition of the
excess of fair value over acquisition cost of $12.5 million
related to an acquisition we made in 2004. |
|
(3) |
|
The number of shares has been adjusted to reflect a 281.562-to-1
stock split in December 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,876
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
12,973
|
|
|
$
|
45,731
|
|
|
$
|
38,948
|
|
|
$
|
10,718
|
|
|
$
|
32,013
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
43,839
|
|
|
$
|
70,289
|
|
|
$
|
114,818
|
|
|
$
|
337,881
|
|
|
$
|
2,134,718
|
|
|
$
|
517,465
|
|
|
$
|
2,889,495
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
88,247
|
|
|
$
|
127,744
|
|
|
$
|
197,017
|
|
|
$
|
458,683
|
|
|
$
|
2,388,384
|
|
|
$
|
607,717
|
|
|
$
|
3,170,456
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
20,549
|
|
|
$
|
24,740
|
|
|
$
|
59,340
|
|
|
$
|
43,133
|
|
|
$
|
1,066,831
|
|
|
$
|
160,913
|
|
|
$
|
1,451,504
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
439,643
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
450,356
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
22,106
|
|
|
$
|
33,940
|
|
|
$
|
59,330
|
|
|
$
|
289,002
|
|
|
$
|
649,818
|
|
|
$
|
311,849
|
|
|
$
|
965,123
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
88,247
|
|
|
$
|
127,744
|
|
|
$
|
197,017
|
|
|
$
|
458,683
|
|
|
$
|
2,388,384
|
|
|
$
|
607,717
|
|
|
$
|
3,170,456
|
|
32
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with the Selected Consolidated Historical
Financial Data and the accompanying financial statements
and related notes thereto and the Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Financial Information included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our future plans,
estimates, beliefs and expected performance. The forward-looking
statements are dependent upon events, risks and uncertainties
that may be outside our control. Our actual results could differ
materially from those discussed in these forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such
differences include, but are not limited to, market prices for
natural gas and oil, economic and competitive conditions,
regulatory changes, estimates of proved reserves, potential
failure to achieve production from development projects, capital
expenditures and other uncertainties, as well as those factors
discussed below and elsewhere in this registration statement,
particularly in Risk Factors and Cautionary
Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements, all of
which are difficult to predict. In light of these risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events
discussed may not occur.
Overview
of Our Company
We are a rapidly expanding independent natural gas and oil
company concentrating on exploration, development and production
activities. We are focused on continuing the exploration and
exploitation of our significant holdings in the West Texas
Overthrust, which we refer to as the WTO, a natural gas prone
geological region where we have operated since 1986 that
includes the Piñon Field and our South Sabino and Big
Canyon Prospects. We also own and operate drilling rigs and
conduct related oil field services, and we own and operate
interests in gas gathering, marketing and processing facilities
and
CO2
gathering and transportation facilities.
On November 21, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding
membership interests in NEG Oil & Gas, or NEG, for
total consideration of approximately $1.5 billion,
excluding cash acquired. With core assets in the Val Verde and
Permian Basins of West Texas, including overlapping or
contiguous interests in the WTO, the NEG acquisition has
dramatically increased our exploration and production segment
operations. The NEG acquisition, coupled with numerous
acquisitions of additional working interests completed during
2007, 2006 and late 2005, have significantly increased our
holdings in the WTO. We also operate significant interests in
the Cotton Valley Trend in East Texas and the Gulf Coast region.
During November 2007, we completed an initial public offering of
our common stock, a portion of the proceeds from which were used
to repay indebtedness outstanding under our senior credit
facility as well as a note payable outstanding related to a
recent acquisition. See further discussion of these transactions
in Note 17 to the September 30, 2007 condensed
consolidated financial statements contained in this prospectus.
Restatement
of Previously Issued Financial Statements
Change
in Method of Accounting for Oil and Gas Operations
In the fourth quarter of 2006, we changed from the successful
efforts method to the full cost method of accounting for our oil
and gas operations. All prior years financial statements
presented have been restated to reflect the change.
Our management believes that the full cost method is preferable
for a company more actively involved in the exploration and
development of oil and gas reserves. The full cost method was
also utilized by NEG prior to the NEG acquisition, and the
assets acquired from NEG constituted more than our total oil and
natural gas assets at that time.
Our financial results have been retroactively restated to
reflect the conversion to the full cost method. As required by
full cost accounting rules, all costs associated with property
acquisition, exploration and
33
development activities are capitalized. Exploration and
development costs include dry hole costs, geological and
geophysical costs, direct overhead related to exploration and
development activities and other costs incurred for the purpose
of finding oil and gas reserves.
In accordance with full cost accounting rules, we are subject to
a limitation on capitalized costs. The capitalized cost of
natural gas and oil properties, net of accumulated depreciation,
depletion and amortization, may not exceed the estimated future
net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves discounted at
10%, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved
properties as adjusted for related tax effects which is known as
the ceiling limitation. If capitalized costs exceed the ceiling
limitation, the excess must be charged to expense. We did not
have any adjustment to earnings due to the ceiling limitation
for the periods presented herein.
Correction
of an Accounting Error
In May 2007, we determined that we had incorrectly accounted for
certain derivative instruments as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 due to a clerical error. For the year
ended December 31, 2006, we recognized an unrealized gain
on change in fair value of derivatives related to mark-to-market
adjustments of derivative instruments with a counterparty of
approximately $3.0 million. As part of our first quarter
2007 closing process, we discovered that the mark-to-market
adjustments booked in 2006 for the derivative instruments with
this counterparty were recorded incorrectly. As part of our
normal closing procedures, we requested from the counterparty
our mark-to-market position. Historically, the counterparties
have sent the statement in terms of our position. During the
fourth quarter of 2006, we entered into derivative instruments
with a new counterparty. The new counterparty confirmed the
mark-to-market loss (gain) with respect to the
counterpartys position, not our position, which we had
requested. The position terms of the statement were not
specified on the confirmation and it was recorded in error
during the 2006 year end closing process. The restatement
had no effect on our previously presented net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities, investing activities or
financing activities for any period presented.
Management took steps during the second quarter of 2007 to
improve our internal control over financial reporting, including
the hiring of experienced financial reporting professionals,
redefining and realigning responsibilities and defining
additional controls, reporting processes and procedures.
Segment
Overview
Operating income is computed as segment operating revenue less
direct operating costs. These measurements provide important
information to us about the activity and profitability of our
lines of business. Set forth in the table below is financial
information regarding each of our current segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Segment revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
37,564
|
|
|
$
|
54,051
|
|
|
$
|
106,413
|
|
|
$
|
50,350
|
|
|
$
|
320,410
|
|
Drilling and oil field services
|
|
|
39,211
|
|
|
|
80,151
|
|
|
|
138,657
|
|
|
|
106,255
|
|
|
|
56,999
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
99,044
|
|
|
|
147,499
|
|
|
|
122,892
|
|
|
|
91,214
|
|
|
|
71,131
|
|
Other
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
5,992
|
|
|
|
20,280
|
|
|
|
15,358
|
|
|
|
13,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
175,995
|
|
|
|
287,693
|
|
|
|
388,242
|
|
|
|
263,177
|
|
|
|
461,775
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Segment operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
14,886
|
|
|
|
17,069
|
|
|
|
8,203
|
|
|
|
138,306
|
|
Drilling and oil field services
|
|
|
4,206
|
|
|
|
18,295
|
|
|
|
32,946
|
|
|
|
27,178
|
|
|
|
14,252
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
3,528
|
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
5,958
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(3,224
|
)
|
|
|
(16,562
|
)
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
(20,172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
|
20,750
|
|
|
|
34,053
|
|
|
|
36,981
|
|
|
|
29,741
|
|
|
|
138,344
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
|
(5,277
|
)
|
|
|
(16,904
|
)
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
(88,630
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
18,830
|
|
|
$
|
27,861
|
|
|
$
|
21,857
|
|
|
$
|
25,858
|
|
|
$
|
56,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Production data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (Mmcf)
|
|
|
6,708
|
|
|
|
6,873
|
|
|
|
13,410
|
|
|
|
6,856
|
|
|
|
35,148
|
|
Oil (MBbls)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
Combined equivalent volumes (Mmcfe)
|
|
|
6,930
|
|
|
|
7,305
|
|
|
|
15,342
|
|
|
|
7,275
|
|
|
|
43,793
|
|
Daily combined equivalent volumes (Mmcfe/d)
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
160.4
|
|
Average prices(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
|
$
|
6.54
|
|
|
$
|
6.19
|
|
|
$
|
6.14
|
|
|
$
|
6.56
|
|
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$
|
34.03
|
|
|
$
|
48.19
|
|
|
$
|
56.61
|
|
|
$
|
61.89
|
|
|
$
|
61.67
|
|
Combined equivalent (per Mcfe)
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
|
$
|
6.63
|
|
|
$
|
6.60
|
|
|
$
|
6.38
|
|
|
$
|
7.30
|
|
Drilling and oil field services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of operational drilling rigs owned at end of period
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
(3)
|
Average number of operational drilling rigs owned during the
period
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
(3)
|
Average total revenue per rig per day(2)
|
|
$
|
9,128
|
|
|
$
|
11,503
|
|
|
$
|
17,034
|
|
|
$
|
17,089
|
|
|
$
|
17,302
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reported prices represent actual average prices for the periods
presented and do not give effect to hedging transactions. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include revenues for related rental equipment. |
|
(3) |
|
Does not include five rigs being retrofitted as of
September 30, 2007. |
We report the results of our operations in the following
segments:
Exploration
and Production Segment
We explore for, develop and produce natural gas and oil
reserves, with a focus on our proved reserves and extensive
undeveloped acreage positions in the WTO. We operate
substantially all of our wells in our core areas and employ our
drilling rigs and other drilling services in the exploration and
development of our operated wells and, to a lesser extent, on
our non-operated wells.
The primary factors affecting the financial results of our
exploration and production segment are the prices we receive for
our natural gas and oil production, the quantity of our natural
gas and oil production and changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments we use to reduce the volatility of the
prices we receive for
35
our natural gas and oil production. Because we are vertically
integrated, our exploration and production activities affect the
results of our oil field service and midstream segments. The NEG
acquisition substantially increased our revenues and operating
income in our exploration and production segment. However,
because our working interest in the Piñon Field increased
to approximately 83%, there are greater intercompany
eliminations that affect the consolidated financial results of
our oil field service and midstream segments.
Exploration and production segment revenues increased to
$320.4 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2007 from $50.4 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, an increase of 536.4%, as a result of a
502.0% increase in volumes and a 14.4% increase in the average
price we received for the natural gas and oil we produced. In
the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 we increased
natural gas production by 28.3 Bcf, to 35.2 Bcf and
increased crude oil production by 1,371 MBbls to
1,441 MBbls. The total combined 36.5 Bcfe increase in
production was due primarily to acquisitions and successful
drilling in the WTO.
The average price we received for our natural gas production for
the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 increased
6.8%, or $0.42 per Mcf, to $6.56 per Mcf from $6.14 per Mcf in
the comparable period in 2006. The average price received for
our crude oil production decreased slightly, however, to $61.67
from $61.89 for the comparable period in 2006. Including the
impact of derivative contract settlements, the effective price
received for natural gas for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2007 was $7.11 per Mcf as compared to $8.21
per Mcf during the comparable period in 2006. Our derivatives
contracts had no impact on effective oil prices during the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 or the comparable period in
2006.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we had
$138.3 million in operating income in our exploration and
production segment, compared to $8.2 million operating
income for the same period in 2006. Our $270.1 million
increase in exploration and production revenues was offset by a
$56.1 million increase in production expenses, and a
$101.9 million increase in depreciation, depletion and
amortization, or DD&A, due to the step up in basis on the
NEG properties. The increase in production expenses was
attributable to the additional properties acquired in the NEG
acquisition and operating expenses on our new wells. During the
nine month period ended September 30, 2007, the exploration
and production segment reported a $55.2 million net gain on
our derivatives positions ($19.2 million realized gains and
$36.0 million in unrealized gains) compared to a
$16.2 million gain ($14.2 realized gains and $2.0
unrealized gains) in the comparable period in 2006. During 2007,
we selectively entered into natural gas swaps and basis swaps by
capitalizing on what we perceived as spikes in the price of
natural gas or favorable basis differences between the NYMEX
price and natural gas prices at our principal West Texas pricing
point of Waha Hub. Unrealized gains or losses on derivative
contracts represent the change in fair value of open derivative
positions during the period. The change in fair value is
principally measured based on period end prices as compared to
the contract price. The unrealized gain recorded in the nine
month period ended September 30, 2007 was attributable to a
decrease in average natural gas prices at September 30,
2007 as compared to the average natural gas prices at the
various contract dates.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, exploration and
production segment revenues increased to $106.4 million
from $54.1 million in 2005 and from $37.6 million in
2004. The increase in 2006 compared to 2005 was attributable to
increased production due to successful drilling activity and
approximately 40 days of production from the NEG
acquisition effective November 21, 2006. NEG contributed
approximately $36.9 million of revenues in the 2006 period.
Production volumes increased to 15,342 Mmcfe in 2006 from
7,305 Mmcfe in 2005, representing a 8,037 Mmcfe, or
110% increase. Approximately 4,902 Mmcfe, or 61%, of the
increase was attributable to the NEG production for the period
from November 21, 2006 to December 31, 2006. Average
combined prices were essentially unchanged at $6.60 per Mcfe as
compared to $6.63 in 2005. The increase in 2005 compared to 2004
was primarily due to a 48% increase in prices. Production
volumes increased approximately 6% during 2005 as compared to
2004 with average daily volumes of 20.0 Mmcfe per day and
18.9 Mmcfe per day, respectively.
Exploration and production segment operating income increased
$2.2 million in 2006 to $17.1 million from
$14.9 million in 2005. The increase was primarily
attributable to the increased production revenues
36
described above, approximately $12.3 million in derivative
gains ($1.9 million unrealized loss) in 2006 as compared to
a $4.1 million derivative loss ($1.3 million
unrealized loss) in 2005, and the addition of NEG for the period
from November 21, 2006 to December 31, 2006. The
increase in the exploration and production segment income was
substantially offset by a $20.5 million, or 106%, increase
in production costs, a $26.7 million, or 380%, increase in
general and administrative expenses and a $19.3 million
increase in DD&A. Approximately $7.0 million of the
increase in production costs was attributable to the NEG
acquisition with remainder of the increase attributable to the
increase in the number of wells operated in 2006 as compared to
2005. The increase in DD&A for our exploration and
production segment was attributable to higher production and the
increase in the full-cost pool due to the NEG acquisition.
Exploration and production operating income increased to
$14.9 million in 2005 from $14.0 million in 2004, due
primarily to higher natural gas and oil prices and a 6% increase
in volumes.
As of December 31, 2006, we had 1,001.8 Bcfe of
estimated net proved reserves with a
PV-10 of
$1,734.3 million, while at December 31, 2005 we had
300.0 Bcfe of estimated net proved reserves with a
PV-10 of
$733.3 million. Our Standardized Measure of Discounted
Future Net Cash Flows was $499.2 million at
December 31, 2005 and $1,440.2 million at
December 31, 2006. For a discussion of
PV-10 and a
reconciliation to Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash
Flows, see Summary Historical Operating and Reserve
Data. The increase is primarily related to the addition of
the NEG reserves which was partially offset by a decrease in the
price of natural gas from $8.40 per Mcf at December 31,
2005 to $5.64 per Mcf at December 31, 2006. Our estimated
proved reserves at December 31, 2005 were considerably
higher than our estimated proved reserves at December 31,
2004, which were 148.5 Bcfe, with an increase of
$300.2 million in
PV-10, due
to an increase in the price of natural gas and oil, the
acquisition of PetroSource and the establishment of additional
proved reserves in the Piñon Field area. Estimates of net
proved reserves are inherently imprecise. In order to prepare
our estimates, we must analyze available geological,
geophysical, production and engineering data and project
production rates and the timing of development expenditures. The
process also requires economic assumptions about matters such as
natural gas and oil prices, drilling and operating expenses,
capital expenditures, taxes and the availability of funds. We
may adjust estimates of proved reserves to reflect production
history, results of exploration and development, prevailing
natural gas and oil prices and other factors, many of which are
beyond our control. Over 98% of our mid-year and year-end
reserve estimates are reviewed by independent petroleum reserve
engineers.
Over the past several years, higher natural gas and oil prices
have led to higher demand for drilling rigs, operating personnel
and field supplies and services. Higher prices have also caused
increases in the costs of those goods and services. To date, the
higher sales prices have more than offset the higher field
costs. Our ownership of drilling rigs has also assisted us in
stabilizing our overall cost structure. Given the inherent
volatility of natural gas and oil prices that are influenced by
many factors beyond our control, we plan our activities and
budget based on conservative sales price assumptions, which
generally are lower than the average sales prices received in
2006. We focus our efforts on increasing natural gas reserves
and production while controlling costs at a level that is
appropriate for long-term operations. Our future earnings and
cash flows are dependent on our ability to manage our overall
cost structure to a level that allows for profitable production.
Like all exploration and production companies, we face the
challenge of natural production declines. As initial reservoir
pressures are depleted, natural gas and oil production from a
given well naturally decreases. Thus, a natural gas and oil
exploration and production company depletes part of its asset
base with each unit of oil or natural gas it produces. We
attempt to overcome this natural decline by drilling and
acquiring more reserves than we produce. Our future growth will
depend on our ability to continue to add reserves in excess of
production. We will maintain our focus on managing the costs
associated with adding reserves through drilling and
acquisitions as well as the costs associated with producing such
reserves. Our ability to add reserves through drilling is
dependent on our capital resources and can be limited by many
factors, including our ability to timely obtain drilling permits
and regulatory approvals. In the WTO, this has not posed a
problem. However, in other areas, the permitting and approval
process has been more difficult in recent years due to increased
activism from environmental and other groups. This has increased
the time it takes to receive permits in some locations.
37
Drilling
and Oil Field Services Segment
We drill for our own account primarily in the WTO through our
drilling and oil field services subsidiary, Lariat Services. We
also drill wells for other natural gas and oil companies,
primarily located in the West Texas region. Our oil field
services business conducts operations that complement our
drilling services operation. These services include providing
pulling units, mud logging, trucking, rental tools, location and
road construction and roustabout services to ourselves and to
third-parties. Additionally, we provide under-balanced drilling
systems only for our own account.
In October 2005, we entered into a joint venture, Larclay, with
CWEI, pursuant to which we jointly acquired twelve
newly-constructed rigs to be used for drilling on CWEIs
prospects and for contracting to third-parties on daywork
drilling contracts. All of these rigs have been delivered,
although one rig has not been assembled. CWEI was responsible
for financing the purchase of the rigs by the terms of the joint
venture and has financed 100% of the acquisition cost of the
rigs. We operate the rigs owned by the joint venture, and after
the initial construction and equipping, all operating costs to
maintain the equipment are borne proportionately between us and
CWEI. We have a 50% interest in Larclay, and we account for this
joint venture as an equity investment.
The financial results of our drilling and oil field services
segment depend on many factors, particularly the demand for and
the price we can charge for our services. We provide drilling
services for our own account and for others, generally on a
daywork, footage or turnkey contract basis. The majority of our
drilling contract revenues are derived from daywork drilling
contracts. However, we generally assess the complexity and risk
of operations, the
on-site
drilling conditions, the type of equipment to be used, the
anticipated duration of the work to be performed and the
prevailing market rates in determining the contract terms we
offer.
Daywork Contracts. Under a daywork drilling
contract, we provide a drilling rig with required personnel to
our customer who supervises the drilling of the well. We are
paid based on a negotiated fixed rate per day while the rig is
used. Daywork drilling contracts specify the equipment to be
used, the size of the hole and the depth of the well. Under a
daywork drilling contract, the customer bears a large portion of
the out-of-pocket drilling costs, and we generally bear no part
of the usual risks associated with drilling, such as time delays
and unanticipated costs. As of September 30, 2007, 26 of
our rigs were operating under daywork contracts and 20 of
these were working for our account. Also as of
September 30, 2007, the 11 operational rigs owned by
Larclay were operating under daywork contracts and seven of
these were working for our account. The remaining four
operational Larclay rigs were working for CWEI as of
September 30, 2007.
Footage Contracts. Under a footage contract,
we are paid a fixed amount for each foot drilled, regardless of
the time required or the problems encountered in drilling the
well. As of September 30, 2007, none of our rigs were
operating under footage contracts.
Turnkey Contracts. Under a typical turnkey
contract, a customer will pay us to drill a well to a specified
depth and under specified conditions for a fixed price,
regardless of the time required or the problems encountered in
drilling the well. We provide most of the equipment and drilling
supplies required to drill the well. We subcontract for related
services such as the provision of casing crews, cementing and
well logging. Generally we do not receive progress payments and
are paid only after the well is drilled. We routinely enter into
turnkey contracts in areas where our experience and expertise
permit us to drill wells more profitably than under a daywork
contract. As of September 30, 2007, one of our rigs was
operating under turnkey contracts.
Drilling and oil field services segment revenue decreased to
$57.0 million in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2007 from $106.3 million in the nine
month period ended September 30, 2006. Operating income
decreased to $14.3 million in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2007 from $27.2 million in the same
period in 2006. The decline in revenues and operating income is
primarily attributable to an increase in the number of rigs
operating on our properties and an increase in our ownership
interest in our natural gas and oil properties. Our drilling and
oil field services segment records revenues and operating income
only on wells drilled for or on behalf of third parties. The
portion of drilling costs incurred by our drilling and oil field
services segment relating to our ownership interest are
capitalized as part of our full-cost pool. With the NEG
acquisition and other WTO property acquisitions, our average
working interest has increased to approximately 85% in the wells
we operate in the WTO, and the third party interest has declined
to less than 20%. During
38
the nine month period ended September 30, 2007,
approximately 70% ($131.9 million) of the drilling and oil
field service revenues were generated by work performed on our
own account and eliminated in consolidation as compared to
approximately 31% ($48.0 million) for the comparable period
in 2006. The number of drilling rigs we owned increased 23.8% to
an average of 26.0 rigs during the nine month period ended
September 30, 2007 from an average of 21.0 rigs in the
comparable period in 2006. The average daily rate we received
per rig of $17,302, excluding revenues for related rental
equipment and before intercompany eliminations was essentially
unchanged from the comparable period in 2006. Our rig
utilization rate was 91.0%, representing 826 stacked rig days in
2007. The decline in operating income was principally
attributable to the increase in the number and working interest
ownership in wells drilled for our own account.
During 2006, our drilling and oil field services segment
reported $138.7 million in revenues, an increase of
$58.5 million, or 73%, from 2005. Operating income
increased to $32.9 million in 2006 from $18.3 million
in 2005. The increase in revenue and operating income was
primarily attributable to an increase in the number of rigs we
owned and an increase in the average revenue per rig per day we
earned from the rigs. The number of rigs we owned increased 32%
to 25 rigs as of December 31, 2006 and the average revenue
we received per rig, excluding revenues for related rental
equipment, increased 48% (before intercompany eliminations) to
$17,034 per day from $11,503 per day. Our margins increased
primarily due to our rig rates increasing faster than our
operating costs.
Drilling and oil field services segment revenue increased to
$80.2 million in 2005 from $39.2 million in 2004.
Operating income increased to $18.3 million in 2005 from
$4.2 million in 2004. The increase in revenue and operating
income was primarily attributable to an increase in the number
of rigs we owned and an increase in the average revenue per rig
per day we earned from the rigs. The average number of rigs we
owned in 2005 increased 79% from 2004 and the average revenue we
received per rig per day, excluding revenues for related rental
equipment, in 2005 increased 26% from 2004 (before intercompany
eliminations).
We believe our ownership of drilling rigs and related oil field
services will continue to be a major catalyst of our growth. As
of August 15, 2007, our drilling fleet consisted of 44
rigs, including the twelve rigs owned by Larclay. Currently, 26
of our rigs are working on properties that we operate; ten of
our rigs are drilling on a contract basis for third-parties;
five are being retrofitted and three are idle or being repaired.
In 2005 we placed an order for 26 drilling rigs to be
constructed by Chinese manufacturers for an approximate
aggregate purchase price of $126.4 million, of which
$75.6 million was attributable to Larclay. We believe this
is a lower cost when compared to newly built
U.S. manufactured rigs with similar capabilities. In the
first quarter of 2007, we took delivery of the three remaining
rigs that we ordered from Chinese manufacturers bringing our
total deliveries to ten rigs.
Midstream
Gas Services Segment
We provide gathering, compression, processing and treating
services of natural gas in West Texas and the Piceance Basin in
northwestern Colorado, primarily through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, ROC Gas. Through our gas marketing subsidiary,
Integra Energy LLC (Integra Energy), we buy and sell
natural gas produced from our operated wells as well as
third-party operated wells. Gas marketing revenue is one of our
largest revenue components; however, it is a very low margin
business. Substantially all of our marketing fees are billed on
a per unit basis. On a consolidated basis, gas purchases and
other costs of sales includes the total value we receive from
third-parties for the gas we sell and the amount we pay for gas,
which are reported as midstream and marketing expense. The
primary factors affecting our midstream gas services are the
quantity of gas we gather, treat and market and the prices we
pay and receive for natural gas.
Midstream gas services revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was $71.1 million compared to
$91.2 million in the comparable period in 2006. The
quarterly and nine month decrease in midstream gas services
revenues is attributable to the increase in our working interest
in the WTO as a result of the NEG and other acquisitions.
Midstream gas services segment revenue decreased
$24.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
from $147.5 million in 2005 to $122.9 million in 2006.
The NEG acquisition significantly decreased our
39
midstream gas services revenue as more gas was transported for
our own account. We do not record midstream gas revenue for
transportation, treating and processing of our own gas. Prior to
the NEG acquisition, transportation, treating and processing of
gas for NEG was recorded as midstream gas services revenue.
Operating income decreased to $3.5 million in 2006 from
$4.1 million in the 2005 period, primarily due to the NEG
acquisition and
start-up
operating expenses for our Sagebrush processing plant in 2006.
The Sagebrush plant was placed into full operation during May
2007. We have the contractual right to periodically increase
fees we receive for transportation and processing based on
certain indexes.
Midstream gas services revenue increased to $147.5 million
in 2005 from $99.0 million in 2004, primarily due to an
increase in the price of natural gas. Volumes in the midstream
gas services segment increased 5% in 2005 from 2004 due to two
acquisitions completed in 2005. Operating income also increased
to $4.1 million in 2005 from $2.6 million in 2004, due
primarily to a $1.5 million contribution from our
consolidating subsidiary, Cholla Pipeline, L.P.
Other
Segment
Our other segment consists primarily of our
CO2
gathering and tertiary oil recovery operations and other
investments. We conduct our
CO2
gathering and tertiary oil recovery operations through
PetroSource. In the fourth quarter of 2005 we acquired a
majority interest in PetroSource, and in the first and second
quarters of 2006 we acquired the remaining interests in
PetroSource. Prior to the majority acquisition of PetroSource we
accounted for PetroSources results of operation as an
equity investment in an unconsolidated subsidiary. We now
include PetroSource in our other segment. Currently most of the
natural gas and oil revenue we receive is from the production of
natural gas; however, we expect more of our revenue to come from
oil production after we initiate our
CO2
flood operations. PetroSource gathers
CO2
from natural gas treatment plants located in West Texas and
transports this
CO2
for use in our and third-parties tertiary oil recovery
operations.
While it is extremely difficult to accurately forecast future
natural gas and oil production, we believe tertiary oil recovery
operations will provide significant long-term production growth
potential at reasonable rates of return with relatively low
risk. The increasing emphasis on
CO2
tertiary oil recovery projects has had, and will continue to
have, an impact on our financial condition in the following
manner:
|
|
|
|
|
there is a significant delay between the initial capital
expenditures for infrastructure and
CO2
injections and the resulting production increases, if any, as
tertiary oil recovery operations require the construction of
facilities before
CO2
flooding can commence. After the infrastructure is in place and
injections begin, it usually takes an additional 18 months
before the field responds (i.e. oil production increases) to the
injection of
CO2;
|
|
|
|
it is anticipated that PetroSource will not be profitable for
the first several years after this offering closes. The
anticipated lack of profitability in the initial years is due
largely to the significant outlay of capital investment in the
CO2
flood projects and the lag of revenues associated with such
expenditures. Thereafter, we will recognize profits only if the
tertiary oil recovery efforts are successful; and
|
|
|
|
our tertiary oil recovery projects are more expensive to operate
than conventional oil fields because of the additional cost of
injecting and recycling the
CO2
(primarily due to the cost of
CO2
and the significant energy requirements to re-compress the
CO2
back into a liquid state for re-injection purposes). If
commodity and energy prices increase, our operating expenses in
these fields will also increase because we use natural gas to
compress the
CO2.
|
40
Results
of Operations
Nine
months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2007
Revenue. Total revenue increased 75.5% to
$461.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 from $263.2 million in the same period in 2006. This
increase was due to a $273.1 million increase in natural
gas and oil sales and was partially offset by lower revenues in
our other segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas and crude oil
|
|
$
|
46,419
|
|
|
$
|
319,556
|
|
|
$
|
273,137
|
|
|
|
588.4
|
%
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
105,713
|
|
|
|
56,928
|
|
|
|
(48,785
|
)
|
|
|
(46.1
|
)%
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
91,218
|
|
|
|
71,131
|
|
|
|
(20,087
|
)
|
|
|
(22.0
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
19,827
|
|
|
|
14,160
|
|
|
|
(5,667
|
)
|
|
|
(28.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
263,177
|
|
|
$
|
461,775
|
|
|
$
|
198,598
|
|
|
|
75.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total natural gas and crude oil revenues increased
$273.1 million to $319.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, compared to $46.4 million
for the same period in 2006, primarily as a result of an
increase in natural gas and crude oil production volumes. Total
natural gas production increased 412.7% to 35,148 Mmcf in
2007 compared to 6,856 Mmcf in 2006, while crude oil
production increased 1,958.6% to 1,441 MBbls in 2007 from
70 MBbls in 2006. Approximately 32,964 Mmcfe of the
36,518 Mmcfe increase in production was attributable to the
NEG acquisition. Average price received for our natural gas and
crude oil production increased 14.4% in the 2007 period to $7.30
per Mcfe compared to $6.38 per Mcfe in 2006, excluding the
impact of derivative contracts.
Drilling and services revenue decreased 46.1% to
$56.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007, compared to $105.7 million in the same period in
2006. The decline in revenues is primarily attributable to an
increase in the number of rigs operating on our properties and
an increase in our ownership interest in our natural gas and oil
properties as a result of the NEG acquisition. The number of
rigs we owned increased to 26.0 (average for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007) in 2007 compared to 21.0
(average for the nine months ended September 30,
2006) in 2006, an increase of 23.8%, and the average daily
revenue per rig, after considering the effect of the elimination
of intercompany usage, was essentially unchanged at $17,302 per
day.
Midstream and marketing revenue decreased $20.1 million, or
22.0%, with revenues of $71.1 million in the nine month
period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to
$91.2 million in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006. The NEG acquisition significantly
decreased our midstream gas services revenues as more gas was
transported for our own account. Prior to the acquisition,
transportation, treating and processing of gas for NEG was
recorded as midstream gas services revenue. We have the
contractual right to periodically increase fees we receive for
transportation and processing based on certain indexes.
Other revenue decreased to $14.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 from $19.8 million for
the same period in 2006. The decrease was primarily due to the
sale of various non-energy related assets to our former
President and Chief Operating Officer. Revenues related to these
assets are included in the 2006 period prior to its sale in
August 2006. This decrease was slightly offset by an increase in
revenues generated by the sale of
CO2.
Other revenue is generated primarily by our
CO2
gathering and sales operations.
41
Operating Costs and Expenses. Total operating
costs and expenses increased to $323.4 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, compared to
$233.4 million for the same period in 2006, primarily due
to increases in our production-related costs as well as an
increase in corporate staff. These increases were partially
offset by decreases in costs attributable to our drilling and
services and midstream and marketing operations as well as
increased gains on derivative instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
$
|
21,625
|
|
|
$
|
77,707
|
|
|
$
|
56,082
|
|
|
|
259.3
|
%
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
12,328
|
|
|
|
9,749
|
|
|
|
378.0
|
%
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
72,670
|
|
|
|
30,935
|
|
|
|
(41,735
|
)
|
|
|
(57.4
|
)%
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
85,525
|
|
|
|
61,191
|
|
|
|
(24,334
|
)
|
|
|
(28.5
|
)%
|
Depreciation, depletion, and
amortization natural gas and crude oil
|
|
|
13,932
|
|
|
|
115,876
|
|
|
|
101,944
|
|
|
|
731.7
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization other
|
|
|
22,106
|
|
|
|
36,545
|
|
|
|
14,439
|
|
|
|
65.3
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
32,024
|
|
|
|
45,781
|
|
|
|
13,757
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
%
|
Gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(16,176
|
)
|
|
|
(55,228
|
)
|
|
|
(39,052
|
)
|
|
|
(241.4
|
)%
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(1,704
|
)
|
|
|
(855
|
)
|
|
|
(100.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
233,436
|
|
|
$
|
323,431
|
|
|
$
|
89,995
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production expense includes the costs associated with our
exploration and production activities, including, but not
limited to, lease operating expense and processing costs.
Production expenses increased $56.1 million primarily due
to a $53.6 million increase because of the addition of the
NEG properties in 2007. The remainder of the increase was due to
an increase in lease operating expenses due to an increase in
the number of wells we operate. Production taxes increased
$9.7 million, or 378.0%, to $12.3 million primarily
due to the addition of the NEG properties in 2007.
Drilling and services and midstream and marketing expenses
decreased 57.4% and 28.5% respectively, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the same period in
2006 primarily because of the increase in the number and working
interest ownership of the wells we drilled for our own account.
DD&A for our natural gas and crude oil properties increased
to $115.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, from $13.9 million in the same
period in 2006. Our DD&A per Mcfe increased $0.73 to $2.65
from $1.92 in the comparable period in 2006. The increase is
primarily attributable to the NEG acquisition, which increased
our depreciable properties by the purchase price plus future
development costs and increased production. Our production
increased 502.0% to 43.8 Bcfe from 7.3 Bcfe in 2006.
DD&A for our other assets consists primarily of
depreciation of our drilling rigs and other equipment. The
increase in DD&A for our drilling and oil field services
equipment was due primarily to the increase in the number of
rigs we own. We calculate depreciation of property and equipment
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives
of the assets, which range from three to 25 years. Our
drilling rigs and related oil field services equipment are
depreciated over an average seven-year useful life.
General and administrative expenses increased $13.8 million
to $45.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, from $32.0 million for the
comparable period in 2006. The increase was principally
attributable to a $21.7 million increase in corporate
salaries and wages which was due to a significant increase in
corporate and support staff. As of September 30, 2007, we
had 2,205 employees as compared to 1,319 at
September 30, 2006. The increase in salaries and wages was
partially offset by a $3.2 million decrease in stock
compensation expense. As part of a severance package for certain
executive officers, the Board of
42
Directors approved the acceleration of vesting of certain stock
awards resulting in increased compensation expense recognized
during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2007, we
recorded a gain of $55.2 million ($36.1 million
unrealized gain and $19.1 million realized gain) on our
derivatives instruments compared to a $16.2 million gain
($2.0 million unrealized gain and $14.2 million
realized gain) for the comparable period in 2006. During 2007,
we selectively entered into natural gas swaps and basis swaps by
capitalizing on what we perceived as spikes in the price of
natural gas or favorable basis differences between the NYMEX
price and natural gas prices at our principal West Texas pricing
point of Waha Hub. Unrealized gains or losses on derivatives
contracts represent the change in fair value of open derivatives
positions during the period. The change in fair value is
principally measured based on period end prices as compared to
the contract price. The unrealized gain recorded in the nine
month period ended September 30, 2007 was attributable to a
decrease in average natural gas prices at September 30,
2007 as compared to the average natural gas prices at the
various contract dates.
Other Income (Expense). Total other expense
increased to $81.4 million in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2007, from $3.9 million in the nine
month period ended September 30, 2006. The increase is
reflected in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
$
|
4,201
|
|
|
$
|
3,753
|
|
|
|
837.7
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
(88,630
|
)
|
|
|
(84,540
|
)
|
|
|
(2067.0
|
)%
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)%
|
Income (loss) from equity investments
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
3,359
|
|
|
|
8397.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(3,883
|
)
|
|
|
(81,351
|
)
|
|
|
(77,468
|
)
|
|
|
(1995.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
25,858
|
|
|
|
56,993
|
|
|
|
31,135
|
|
|
|
120.4
|
%
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,931
|
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
|
|
14,071
|
|
|
|
203.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
18,927
|
|
|
$
|
35,991
|
|
|
$
|
17,064
|
|
|
|
90.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income increased to $4.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, from $0.4 million for
the same period in 2006. This increase was due to interest
income from investment of excess cash after the repayment of
debt.
Interest expense increased to $88.6 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, from $4.1 million for
the same period in 2006. This increase was attributable to
increased average debt balances. To finance the NEG acquisition,
we entered into a $750 million senior credit facility,
which has an initial borrowing base of $300 million, and an
$850 million senior bridge facility. In March 2007, we
entered into a $1.0 billion term loan and sold
17.8 million shares of common stock in a private placement.
A portion of the proceeds from the senior unsecured term loan
was used to repay the bridge loan. Please read
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we
reported income from equity investments of $3.4 million as
compared to $40,000 in the comparable period in 2006.
Approximately $1.6 million of the increase was attributable
to income from our interest in the Grey Ranch processing plant
which has experienced increased profitability due to higher
levels of utilization during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006.
Approximately $1.8 million of the increase was attributable
to income from Larclay as all of Larclays rigs have now
been delivered and all but one rig are operational.
We reported an income tax expense of $21.0 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to an
expense of $6.9 million for the same period in 2006. The
current period income tax expense
43
represents an effective income tax rate of 36.9% as compared to
26.8% in the comparable period in 2006. The lower effective
income tax rate in 2006 was attributable to favorable percentage
depletion deductions during that period.
Year
Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Revenue. Total revenue increased to
$388.2 million in 2006 from $287.7 million in 2005,
which is further explained by the categories below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas and crude oil
|
|
$
|
49,987
|
|
|
$
|
101,252
|
|
|
$
|
51,265
|
|
|
|
102.6
|
%
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
80,343
|
|
|
|
139,049
|
|
|
|
58,706
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
%
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
147,133
|
|
|
|
122,896
|
|
|
|
(24,237
|
)
|
|
|
(16.5
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
10,230
|
|
|
|
25,045
|
|
|
|
14,815
|
|
|
|
144.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
287,693
|
|
|
$
|
388,242
|
|
|
$
|
100,549
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas and crude oil revenue increased $51.3 million
to $101.3 million in 2006 from $50.0 million in 2005.
This was primarily a result of an increase in natural gas
production volumes. Total natural gas production almost doubled
to 13,410 Mmcf in 2006 compared to 6,873 Mmcf in 2005.
Natural gas prices decreased $0.35, or 5%, in the 2006 period to
$6.19 per Mcf compared to $6.54 per Mcf in 2005.
Drilling and services revenue increased 73% to
$139.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
compared to $80.3 million in the same period in 2005,
primarily due to an increase in the number of drilling rigs we
owned and to an increase in the average daily revenue per rig.
The number of rigs we owned increased to 25 (21.9 average for
the year) as of December 31, 2006 compared to 19 (14.3
average for the year) in 2005, an increase of 32%, and the
average daily revenue per rig, after considering the effect of
the elimination of intercompany usage, increased 48% to $17,034
in 2006 compared to $11,503 in 2005. Additionally, the revenue
from our heavy hauling trucking subsidiary increased
$7.8 million during the comparison period due to an
expansion of our trucking services. The revenue from our pulling
unit operations increased $7.7 million because of an
increase in the demand for these oil field services and an
increase in the rate we charge.
Midstream and marketing revenue decreased $24.2 million
from 2005 with revenues of $122.9 million during the year
ended December 31, 2006 as compared to $147.1 million
in 2005. We do not record midstream and marketing revenues for
marketing, transportation, treating and processing of our own
gas. The NEG acquisition significantly decreased our midstream
gas services revenues as more gas was transported and marketed
for our own account. Prior to the NEG acquisition,
transportation, treating and processing of gas for NEG was
recorded as midstream and marketing revenue. We have the
contractual right to periodically increase fees we receive for
transportation and processing based on certain indexes.
Other revenues increased $14.8 million to
$25.0 million in 2006 from $10.2 million in 2005. The
increase was primarily attributable to an increase of
$12.0 million in
CO2
and tertiary oil recovery revenues. In December 2005, we
acquired an additional equity interest in PetroSource which
increased our ownership interest to 86.5%, resulting in the
consolidation of PetroSource commencing in the fourth quarter of
2005. We recorded PetroSource revenues for the full year in
2006. The remainder of the increase was attributable to
additional administration fees collected from operating natural
gas and oil wells and lease acreage income received as a result
of an increase in the number of wells, an increase in overhead
rates and an increase in leasing activities. Approximately
$0.9 million of the increase was related to an increase of
revenue from Stockton Plaza.
44
Operating Costs and Expenses. Total operating
costs and expenses increased $97.6 million to
$351.3 million in 2006 from $253.6 million in 2005,
which is further explained by the categories below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
$
|
16,195
|
|
|
$
|
35,149
|
|
|
$
|
18,954
|
|
|
|
117.0
|
%
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
%
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
52,122
|
|
|
|
98,436
|
|
|
|
46,314
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
%
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
141,372
|
|
|
|
115,076
|
|
|
|
(26,296
|
)
|
|
|
(18.6
|
)%
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization-natural gas and oil
|
|
|
9,313
|
|
|
|
26,321
|
|
|
|
17,008
|
|
|
|
182.6
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization-other
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
29,305
|
|
|
|
14,412
|
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
55,634
|
|
|
|
43,726
|
|
|
|
367.2
|
%
|
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
(12,291
|
)
|
|
|
(16,423
|
)
|
|
|
(397.5
|
)%
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
(1,570
|
)
|
|
|
(287.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
253,640
|
|
|
$
|
351,261
|
|
|
$
|
97,621
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production expense increased to $35.1 million in 2006 from
$16.2 million in 2005 primarily due to the increase in the
number of wells operated in 2006 as compared to 2005, the
addition of NEG for the period from November 21, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 and the addition of PetroSource for the
full year in 2006 as compared to one quarter in 2005.
Approximately $7.5 million of the increase was attributable
to the NEG acquisition and approximately $3.2 million of
the increase was attributable to PetroSource with the remainder
of the increase due to an increase in the number of wells we
operate.
Production taxes increased $1.5 million, or 47%, to
$4.7 million due to the increase in natural gas production,
which was partially offset by a decline in realized natural gas
prices. Production taxes are generally assessed at the wellhead
and are based on the volumes produced times the price received.
Drilling and services expenses increased 89% to
$98.4 million in 2006 from $52.1 million in 2005,
primarily due to an increase in our oil field services operating
expense. Oil field services operating expenses, including fuel,
repairs and maintenance, increased $14.2 million due to an
increase in the number of drilling rigs we owned as well as work
we performed on a turnkey and footage basis rather than a day
rate basis.
Midstream and marketing expenses decreased $26.3 million,
or 19%, to $115.1 million in 2006 as compared to
$141.4 million in 2005 due to a decrease in the average
price paid for gas that we market and a decrease in gas
purchased from third parties as we focused our marketing efforts
more on our own production.
DD&A relating to our natural gas and oil properties
increased 183% to $26.3 million in 2006 from
$9.3 million in 2005. The increase was primarily
attributable to a 110% increase in year-over-year production and
a 35% increase in DD&A. The average DD&A per Mcfe was
$1.72 for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to
$1.27 in 2005. The increase in the DD&A was attributable to
the NEG acquisition which added significantly higher reserves at
a higher cost per Mcfe.
DD&A related to our other property, plant and equipment
increased $14.4 million, or 97%, primarily due to our
investment in additional drilling rigs and oil field service
equipment.
General and administrative expense increased $43.7 million
to $55.6 million in 2006 from $11.9 million in 2005,
due in part to an increase in expense related to salaries and
wages as we added a significant amount of staff to accommodate
our acquisitions and our increased drilling activities, a
$5 million dispute settlement, a $3.6 million increase
in property and franchise taxes, higher administrative costs
associated with our increase in staff including rent, utilities,
insurance and office equipment and supplies, a $2.5 million
increase in bad debt expense and an increase in legal and
professional expenses. Legal and professional fees increased
$4.7 million due primarily to an increase in legal fees
relating to two legal issues and increased audit fees.
45
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded a gain on
derivative instruments of $12.3 million compared to a loss
of $4.1 million in 2005. We entered into collars and
fixed-price swaps to mitigate the effect of price fluctuations
of natural gas and oil. We enter into natural gas basis swaps to
mitigate the risk of fluctuations in pricing differentials
between our natural gas well head prices and benchmark spot
prices. We have not designated any of these derivative contracts
as hedges for accounting purposes. We record derivatives
contracts at fair value on the balance sheet, and gains or
losses resulting from changes in the fair value of our
derivative contracts (unrealized) are recognized as a component
of operating costs and expenses. Unrealized gains or losses are
realized upon settlement. During the first eleven months of
2006, we settled or terminated all of our natural gas derivative
contracts and realized a net gain of approximately
$14.2 million. We did not enter into any new derivative
instruments until December 2006 and the first quarter of 2007.
Offsetting the 2006 net realized gain on the settlement or
early termination of our derivative instruments was a net
unrealized loss of $1.9 million which represented the
change in fair value of our derivatives instruments from the
purchase date in early December 2006 to December 31, 2006.
Generally, we record unrealized gains on our swaps and
fixed-price swaps when natural gas and oil commodity prices
decrease and record unrealized losses as natural gas and oil
prices increase. We record unrealized gains on our basis swaps
if the pricing differential increases and unrealized losses as
the pricing differential decreases. Gains or losses on
derivatives contracts are realized upon settlement. During 2005
we did not terminate any derivatives positions and realized a
loss of $2.8 million due to normal settlements. Future
volatility in natural gas and oil prices could have an adverse
effect on the operating results of our exploration and
production segment.
Other Income (Expense). Total other expense
increased to $15.1 million in 2006 from $6.2 million
in 2005. The increase is discussed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
|
|
438.3
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(5,277
|
)
|
|
|
(16,904
|
)
|
|
|
(11,627
|
)
|
|
|
(220.3
|
)%
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
%
|
Income (loss) from equity investments
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
351.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(6,192
|
)
|
|
|
(15,124
|
)
|
|
|
(8,932
|
)
|
|
|
(144.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
27,861
|
|
|
|
21,857
|
|
|
|
(6,004
|
)
|
|
|
(21.5
|
)%
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9,968
|
|
|
|
6,236
|
|
|
|
(3,732
|
)
|
|
|
(37.4
|
)%
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
18,122
|
|
|
$
|
15,621
|
|
|
$
|
(2,501
|
)
|
|
|
(13.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income increased to $1.1 million in 2006 from
$0.2 million in 2005. This increase was due to interest
income recognized in 2006 related to excess cash balances with
various financial institutions.
Interest expense increased to $16.9 million in 2006 from
$5.3 million in 2005. This increase was due to the
additional debt that we incurred to finance our purchase of NEG.
We recorded income from equity investments of $1.0 million
in 2006 as compared to a $0.4 million loss in 2005. The
2005 loss was primarily due to PetroSource. We accounted for
PetroSource under the equity method during the first nine months
of 2005.
Income tax expense decreased to $6.2 million in 2006 from
$10.0 million in 2005 primarily due to a decrease in our
effective income tax rate. During 2006, we realized a
$3.5 million reduction in tax expense from our percentage
depletion deduction, which was partially offset by
$1.3 million in additional state income taxes.
46
Year
Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2005
Revenue. Total revenue increased to
$287.7 million in 2005 from $176.0 million in 2004,
which is further explained by the categories below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas and crude oil
|
|
$
|
33,685
|
|
|
$
|
49,987
|
|
|
$
|
16,302
|
|
|
|
48.4
|
%
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
39,417
|
|
|
|
80,343
|
|
|
|
40,926
|
|
|
|
103.8
|
%
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
98,906
|
|
|
|
147,133
|
|
|
|
48,227
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
3,987
|
|
|
|
10,230
|
|
|
|
6,243
|
|
|
|
156.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
175,995
|
|
|
$
|
287,693
|
|
|
$
|
111,698
|
|
|
|
63.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas and crude oil revenue increased $16.3 million
to $50.0 million in 2005 from $33.7 million in 2004.
This was due to an increase in the average price we received for
the natural gas and oil we produced, which increased to $6.63
per Mcfe in 2005 from $4.47 per Mcfe in 2004. Combined volumes
were essentially unchanged from 2004 to 2005.
Drilling and services revenue increased to $80.3 million in
2005 from $39.4 million in 2004, primarily due to an
increase in the number of drilling rigs we owned and an increase
in the average daily revenue we earned from our rigs. Average
daily revenue per rig, after considering the effect of the
elimination of intercompany usage, increased to $11,503 in 2005
from $9,128 in 2004, and our rig fleet increased to 19
(14.3 average) rigs in 2005 from ten (8.0 average) rigs in
2004. Revenue from our oil field trucking division increased
$2.9 million because this division started operations in
2005, and our air compression rental increased $2.0 million
due to an increase in the number of compressor units in
operation.
Midstream and marketing revenue increased to $147.1 million
in 2005 from $98.9 million in 2004, primarily due to an
increase in the price of natural gas and a 5% increase in
volumes. Following a review of area gathering fees in May 2005,
we recommended and our partners accepted a 43% increase in the
gathering fees we charge to $0.10 per Mcf from $0.07 per Mcf.
The plant fee also increased in April 2005 from $0.21 to $0.22,
a 3% increase.
Other revenues increased $6.2 million, or 157%, primarily
due to a $3.8 million increase in
CO2
and tertiary oil recovery revenue in 2005 from $0 in 2004. The
increase was due to our consolidation of PetroSource in 2005.
Through September 30, 2005, PetroSource was accounted for
under the equity method. The remainder of the increase was due
to an increase in the fees and other income collected from
operating natural gas and oil wells and conducting related
activities.
47
Operating Costs and Expenses. Total operating
costs and expenses increased $98.4 million to
$253.6 million in 2005 from $155.2 million in 2004,
which is further explained by the categories below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
$
|
10,230
|
|
|
$
|
16,195
|
|
|
$
|
5,965
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
%
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
26,442
|
|
|
|
52,122
|
|
|
|
25,680
|
|
|
|
97.1
|
%
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
96,180
|
|
|
|
141,372
|
|
|
|
45,192
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization-natural gas and oil
|
|
|
4,909
|
|
|
|
9,313
|
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
|
|
89.7
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization-other
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
7,128
|
|
|
|
91.8
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,554
|
|
|
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
81.7
|
%
|
Loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
3,254
|
|
|
|
370.6
|
%
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
360.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
155,245
|
|
|
$
|
253,640
|
|
|
$
|
98,395
|
|
|
|
63.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production expense increased to $16.2 million in 2005 from
$10.2 million in 2004 primarily as a result of an increase
in lease operating expense. Lease operating expense increased
$1.6 million, primarily due to an increase in the number of
wells operated. The consolidation of PetroSource added
$2.2 million in 2005 production expense. In December 2005,
we increased our equity interest in PetroSource to 86.5% which
required us to consolidate PetroSource effective in the fourth
quarter of 2005. Generally, our production expense has increased
along with the growth in our exploration and production
activities.
Production taxes increased 27% primarily as a result of an
increase in the average price realized on our natural gas
production of $2.11 per Mcf.
Drilling and services expenses increased 97% to
$52.1 million in 2005 from $26.4 million in 2004,
primarily due to an increase in our oil field services operating
expense. Oil field services operating expenses, including fuel,
repairs and maintenance, increased $14.2 million due to an
increase in the number of drilling rigs we owned as well as work
we performed on a turnkey and footage basis rather than a day
rate basis.
Midstream and marketing increased 47% to $141.4 million in
2005 from $96.2 million in 2004, primarily due to a 48%
increase in the average price of natural gas paid by our
marketing company. Volumes during 2005 were essentially
unchanged from 2004.
DD&A relating to our natural gas and oil properties
increased 90% to $9.3 million in 2005 from
$4.9 million in 2004. The increase was primarily
attributable to a 79% increase in our DD&A in 2005 and a 5%
increase in production volumes. The average DD&A was $1.27
per Mcfe for the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared
to $0.71 per Mcfe in 2004. The increase in the DD&A was
attributable to our increased drilling activities which added
reserves at a higher cost per Mcfe.
DD&A for our other property, plant and equipment increased
$7.1 million, or 92%, primarily due to our investment in
additional drilling rigs and oil field service equipment.
General and administrative expense increased $5.3 million
to $11.9 million in 2005 from $6.6 million in 2004,
primarily as a result of an increase in salaries and wages of
$4.3 million and a slight increase in legal and
professional expenses.
48
Other Income (Expense). Total other expense
increased to $6.2 million in 2005 from $1.9 million in
2004. The increase is discussed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
|
267.9
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
|
(5,277
|
)
|
|
|
(3,599
|
)
|
|
|
(214.5
|
)%
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
(181.3
|
)%
|
Loss from equity investments
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
(966.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(1,920
|
)
|
|
|
(6,192
|
)
|
|
|
(4,272
|
)
|
|
|
(222.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
18,830
|
|
|
|
27,861
|
|
|
|
9,031
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
9,968
|
|
|
|
3,535
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
(49.2
|
)%
|
Extraordinary gain
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,544
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
25,392
|
|
|
$
|
18,122
|
|
|
$
|
(7,270
|
)
|
|
|
(28.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense increased to $5.3 million in 2005 from
$1.7 million in 2004. This increase was due to the
additional debt that we incurred to finance our investment in
natural gas and oil properties and oil field services equipment,
including the additional drilling rigs.
The increase in loss from equity investments was primarily due
to the operating loss from our equity investment in Grey Ranch,
L.P. in 2005.
Income tax expense increased to $10.0 million in 2005 from
$6.4 million in 2004 primarily due to an increase in income
before taxes, which increased to $27.9 million in 2005 from
$18.8 million in 2004. Our effective tax rate for the year
ended December 31, 2005 increased slightly to 36% from 34%
in 2004.
The extraordinary gain was attributable to our purchase of the
Foreland Corporation in 2004 and represented the difference
between the fair value of assets acquired and the purchase
price. The fair value of the assets acquired was
$13.8 million and the purchase price was $1.2 million.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Summary
Our operating cash flow is influenced mainly by the prices that
we receive for our natural gas and oil production; the quantity
of natural gas we produce; and, to a lesser extent, the quantity
of oil we produce; the success of our development and
exploration activities; the demand for our drilling rigs and oil
field services and the rates we receive for these services; and
the margins we obtain from our natural gas and
CO2
gathering and processing contracts.
During 2006 and the first quarter of 2007, we entered into
various debt and equity transactions to fund the acquisition of
NEG and our 2007 capital expenditure program. As of
September 30, 2007, our cash and cash equivalents were
$32.0 million, and we had approximately $300.0 million
available under our senior credit facility. The significant cash
balance at September 30, 2007 was the result of borrowings
under our senior credit facility in anticipation of an
acquisition that closed subsequent to quarter-end. On
November 9, 2007, we repaid amounts outstanding under our
senior credit facility with a portion of the proceeds from our
initial public offering. There are currently no amounts
outstanding under our senior credit facility. As of
September 30, 2007, we had $1,452 million in total
debt outstanding.
49
Cash
Flows from Continuing Operations
Our cash flows from continuing operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
38,458
|
|
|
$
|
63,297
|
|
|
$
|
67,349
|
|
|
$
|
67,500
|
|
|
$
|
239,556
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(59,408
|
)
|
|
|
(155,826
|
)
|
|
|
(1,340,567
|
)
|
|
|
(223,256
|
)
|
|
|
(897,341
|
)
|
Cash flows provided by financing activities
|
|
|
34,700
|
|
|
|
126,413
|
|
|
|
1,266,435
|
|
|
|
120,743
|
|
|
|
650,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13,750
|
|
|
$
|
33,884
|
|
|
$
|
(6,783
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,013
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by
operating activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 were $239.6 million and
$67.5 million, respectively. The increase in cash provided
by operating activities from 2006 to 2007 was primarily due to
our 502.0% increase in production volumes as a result of the NEG
and various other acquisitions as well as our drilling success.
Also, contributing to this increase was a 241.4% increase in
realized and unrealized gains on our derivative contracts. These
increases were partially offset by increases in general and
administrative costs such as salaries and wages.
Cash flows provided by operating activities increased
$4.0 million to $67.3 million in 2006 from
$63.3 million in 2005 primarily due to an increase in
non-cash DD&A of $31.4 million and an increase in
non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $8.3 million
as net income decreased approximately $2.5 million in 2006
over 2005. The increases were substantially offset by changes in
operating assets and liabilities.
Cash flows provided by continuing operating activities increased
$24.8 million to $63.3 million in 2005 from
$38.5 million in 2004, due primarily to an increase in
operating income and an increase in non-cash expenses. Operating
income increased $13.3 million whereas net income decreased
$7.3 million. The 2004 period included a $12.5 million
extraordinary gain that had no effect on cash flow from
operations. DD&A increased $11.5 million, and the
remainder of the change was due to a $0.9 million net
increase in operating assets and liabilities and a
$3.1 million change due to changes in fair value of
derivatives contracts.
Investing Activities. Cash flows used in
investing activities increased to $897.3 million in the
nine month period ended September 30, 2007 from
$223.3 million in the 2006 period as we continued to ramp
up our capital expenditure program. For the nine month period
ended September 30, 2007, our capital expenditures were
$706.6 million in our exploration and production segment,
$104.8 million for drilling and oil field services,
$45.4 million for midstream gas services and
$38.4 million for other capital expenditures. During the
same period in 2006, capital expenditures were
$88.9 million in our exploration and production segment,
$53.8 million for drilling and oil field services,
$25.4 million for midstream gas services and
$13.1 million for other capital expenditures.
Cash flows used in investing activities increased to
$1,341 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
from $155.8 million in 2005 and $59.4 million in 2004.
During 2006, our cash flows used in investing activities
included acquisitions of $1,054 million, including the NEG
acquisition described above. During the comparison period,
exploration and production capital expenditures increased to
$170.9 million in 2006 from $61.2 million in 2005 and
$29.1 million in 2004 primarily because of the additional
wells that were drilled in the Piñon Field in 2006 and
2005. Capital expenditures for drilling and oil field services
increased to $89.8 million in 2006 from $43.7 million
in 2005 and $22.7 million in 2004 due to an increase in the
number
50
of drilling rigs. Proceeds from the sale of assets increased to
$19.7 million in 2006 from $3.3 million in 2005 and
$1.4 million in 2004.
Financing Activities. Since December 2005, we
have used equity issuances, borrowings and, to a lesser extent,
our cash flows from operations to fund our rapid growth.
Proceeds from borrowings increased to $1,262.8 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, and we repaid
approximately $879.6 million leaving net borrowings during
the period of approximately $383.2 million. We also
received net proceeds of approximately $318.7 million from
a private placement of our common stock. We used the net
proceeds from the term loan and the common stock issuance to
repay the senior bridge facility and to repay all of our
outstanding borrowings under our senior credit facility. Our
financing activities provided $650.9 million in cash for
the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to
$120.7 million in the comparable period in 2006.
During the year ended December 31, 2006 we incurred net
borrowings of $743 million, raised $100.8 million from
issuances of common stock and raised $439.5 million from an
issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock. Our net
borrowings, common stock issuances and issuance of redeemable
preferred stock in 2006 were primarily used to finance the NEG
acquisition as well as our 2006 capital expenditure program.
During 2005 we received proceeds of $173.1 million from the
issuance of common stock and had net repayments of
$53.8 million as compared to net borrowings of
$34.8 million in 2004. Most of our borrowings in 2005
funded the acquisition of our drilling rigs, our exploration and
production activities and the expansion of our gathering and
treating assets. In December 2005, we received
$173.1 million in net proceeds from a private placement of
12.5 million shares of common stock, which was primarily
used to reduce outstanding borrowings.
Credit
Facilities and Other Indebtedness
Senior Credit Facility. On November 21,
2006, we entered into a new $750 million senior secured
revolving credit facility (the senior credit
facility) with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative
Agent and Banc of America Securities LLC as Lead Arranger and
Book Running Manager. The senior credit facility matures on
November 21, 2011.
The proceeds of the senior credit facility were used to
(i) partially finance the NEG acquisition,
(ii) refinance our existing senior secured revolving credit
facility and NEGs existing credit facility, and
(iii) pay fees and expenses related to the NEG acquisition
and our existing credit facility. Future borrowings under the
senior credit facility will be available for capital
expenditures, working capital and general corporate purposes and
to finance permitted acquisitions of natural gas and oil
properties and other assets related to the exploration,
production and development of natural gas and oil properties.
The senior credit facility will be available to be drawn on and
repaid without restriction so long as we are in compliance with
its terms, including certain financial covenants.
The senior credit facility contains various covenants that limit
our and certain of our subsidiaries ability to grant
certain liens; make certain loans and investments; make
distributions; redeem stock; redeem or prepay debt; merge or
consolidate with or into a third party; or engage in certain
asset dispositions, including a sale of all or substantially all
of our assets. Additionally, the senior credit facility limits
our and certain of our subsidiaries ability to incur
additional indebtedness with certain exceptions, including under
the senior unsecured bridge facility (as discussed below), which
was repaid in full during March 2007.
The senior credit facility also contains financial covenants,
including maintenance of agreed upon levels for the ratio of
(i) our total funded debt to EBITDAX (as defined in the
senior credit facility), which may not exceed 4.5:1.0 calculated
using the last fiscal quarter on an annualized basis as of the
end of fiscal quarters ending on or before September 30,
2008 and calculated using the last four completed fiscal
quarters thereafter, (ii) our ratio of EBITDAX to interest
expense plus current maturities of long-term debt, which must be
at least 2.5:1.0 calculated using the last fiscal quarter on an
annualized basis as of the end of fiscal quarters ending on or
before September 30, 2008 and calculated using the last
four completed fiscal quarters thereafter, and (iii) our
current ratio, which must be at least 1.0:1.0. As of the end of
the third quarter 2007 we were in compliance with these
financial covenants.
51
The obligations under the senior credit facility are secured by
first priority liens on all shares of capital stock of each of
our present and future subsidiaries; all intercompany debt of us
and our subsidiaries; and substantially all of our assets and
the assets of our guarantor subsidiaries, including proven
natural gas and oil reserves representing at least 80% of the
present discounted value (as defined in the senior credit
facility) of our proven natural gas and oil reserves reviewed in
determining the borrowing base for the senior credit facility
(as determined by the Administrative Agent). Additionally, the
obligations under the senior credit facility will be guaranteed
by certain of our subsidiaries.
The borrowing base for the senior credit facility is determined
by the administrative agent in its sole discretion in accordance
with its normal and customary natural gas and oil lending
practices and approved by lenders. The reaffirmation of an
existing borrowing base amount or an increase in the borrowing
base will require approval by Required Lenders (as defined in
the senior credit facility). The borrowing base is subject to
review semi-annually; however, Required Lenders reserve the
right to have (a) one additional redetermination within the
first twelve months from the closing date and (b) one
additional redetermination of the borrowing base per calendar
year thereafter. Unscheduled redeterminations may be made at our
request, but are limited to two such requests during the twelve
months following the closing date and one request per twelve
months thereafter.
The borrowing base includes proved developed producing reserves,
proved developed non-producing reserves and proved undeveloped
reserves and was $700.0 million as of September 2007. As of
September 30, 2007, we had outstanding indebtedness of
$400 million on our senior credit facility. We repaid all
outstanding borrowings under this facility on November 9,
2007, and there are currently no amounts outstanding under the
senior credit facility.
At our election, interest under the senior credit facility is
determined by reference to (i) the British Bankers
Association LIBOR rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin
between 1.25% and 2.00% per annum or (ii) the higher of the
federal funds rate plus 0.5% or the prime rate plus, in either
case, an applicable margin between 0.25% and 1.00% per annum.
Interest will be payable quarterly for prime rate loans and at
the applicable maturity date for LIBOR loans, except that if the
interest period for a LIBOR loan is six months, interest will be
paid at the end of each three-month period. The average interest
rates paid on amounts outstanding under our senior credit
facility for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2007 were 7.08% and 7.62%, respectively.
If an event of default exists under the senior credit facility,
the lenders may accelerate the maturity of the obligations
outstanding under the senior credit facility and exercise other
rights and remedies. Each of the following will be an event of
default:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to pay any principal when due or any interest, fees or
other amount within certain grace periods;
|
|
|
|
failure to perform or otherwise comply with the covenants in the
credit agreement or other loan documents, subject, in certain
instances, to certain grace periods;
|
|
|
|
bankruptcy or insolvency events involving us or our subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
a change of control (as defined in the senior credit facility).
|
March 2007 Term Loan. On March 22, 2007,
we entered into a $1 billion senior unsecured term loan.
The proceeds of the term loan were used to partially repay the
senior bridge facility described below. The term loan includes
both a floating rate tranche and fixed rate tranche.
We issued $350 million at a variable rate with interest
payable quarterly and principal due on April 1, 2014 (the
Variable Rate Term Loans). The Variable Rate Term
Loans bear interest, at our option, at LIBOR plus 3.625% or the
higher of (i) the federal funds rate, as defined, plus
3.125% or (ii) a Banks prime rate plus 2.625%. After
April 1, 2009 the Variable Rate Term Loans may be prepaid
in whole or in part with a prepayment penalty. The average
interest rates paid on amounts outstanding under our variable
rate term loans for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2007 were 8.99% and 8.98%, respectively.
52
We issued $650 million at a fixed rate of 8.625% with
principal due on April 1, 2015 (the Fixed Rate Term
Loans). Under the terms of the Fixed Rate Term Loans,
interest is payable quarterly and during the first four years
interest may be paid, at our option, either entirely in cash or
entirely with additional Fixed Rate Term Loans. If we elect to
pay the interest due during any period in additional Fixed Rate
Term Loans, the interest rate increases to 9.375% during such
period. After April 1, 2011 the Fixed Rate Term Loans may
be prepaid in whole or in part with prepayment penalties.
After March 22, 2008, we are required to offer to exchange
the term loan for senior unsecured notes with registration
rights. The senior unsecured notes will have substantially
similar terms and conditions as the term loan. If we are unable
to or do not offer to exchange the term loan for senior
unsecured notes with registration rights by April 30, 2008,
the interest rate on the term loan will increase by 0.25% every
90 days up to a maximum of 0.50%. The term loan contains
other covenants which are ordinary and customary including
limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness, payment of
dividends, asset sales, certain asset purchases, transactions
with related parties and consolidation or merger agreements.
Other Indebtedness. We have financed a portion
of our drilling rig fleet and related oil field services
equipment through notes with Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation.
At September 30, 2007, the aggregate outstanding balance of
these credit agreements was $51.3 million, with a fixed
interest rate ranging from 7.64% to 8.87%. The notes have a
final maturity date of November 1, 2010, aggregate monthly
installments for principal and interest in the amount of
$1.2 million and are secured by the equipment. The notes
have a prepayment penalty (currently 1-3%) in the event we repay
the notes prior to maturity.
We have financed the purchase of various vehicles, oil field
services equipment and other equipment used in our business. The
aggregate outstanding balance of these notes as of
December 31, 2006 was $4.5 million. These notes were
repaid during the three months ended September 30, 2007
with borrowings under our senior credit facility.
On October 14, 2005, Sagebrush Pipeline, LLC borrowed
$4.0 million from Bank of America, N.A. for the purpose of
completing the gas processing plant and pipeline in Colorado.
This loan was repaid in full in July 2007.
Senior Bridge Facility. On November 21,
2006, we also entered into an $850 million senior unsecured
bridge facility (the senior bridge facility) with
Banc of America Bridge LLC, as the Initial Bridge Lender and
Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities,
Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., and Lehman Brothers Inc., as
joint lead arrangers and bookrunners. This facility was repaid
in full during March 2007 with proceeds from our senior
unsecured term loan.
Together with borrowings under the senior credit facility, the
proceeds from the senior bridge facility were used to
(i) partially finance the NEG acquisition,
(ii) refinance our existing senior secured revolving credit
facility and NEGs existing credit facility, and
(iii) pay fees and expenses related to the NEG acquisition
and our existing credit facility. The obligations under the
senior bridge facility are general unsecured obligations of our
company and certain of our subsidiaries. The senior bridge
facility was paid in full in March 2007 with the proceeds
from the term loan and the common stock issuance described above.
The senior bridge facility contained customary restrictive
covenants pertaining to management and operations of our company
and our subsidiaries similar to those contained in the senior
credit facility. Generally, amounts outstanding under the senior
bridge facility bore interest at a base rate equal to the
greater of (i) three-month LIBOR plus an applicable margin
initially equal to 4.50% per annum or (ii) 9.0% per annum
plus an applicable margin initially equal to 0% per annum;
provided that the applicable margin for the senior bridge
facility will increase by 0.5% at the end of the period that is
six months after the closing date for the senior bridge facility
and an additional 0.25% per quarter thereafter for as long as
the senior bridge facility, Rollover Loans or Exchange Notes
remain outstanding subject to a cap of 11% (subject to certain
additional interest rate increases in certain circumstances). In
addition, the senior bridge facility included a covenant that
obligated us to use commercially reasonable efforts to refinance
the senior bridge facility as promptly as practicable.
53
Prior Senior Credit Facility. Prior to its
termination on November 21, 2006, we had a
$130 million revolving credit facility in place with Bank
of America, N.A. (the prior senior credit facility).
The prior senior credit facility included a $20 million
sub-limit for letters of credit. The prior senior credit
facility was replaced by the senior credit facility as of
November 21, 2006. Advances under the prior senior credit
facility were subject to a borrowing base based on our proved
developed producing reserves, our proved developed non-producing
reserves and proved undeveloped reserves. The borrowing base was
subject to re-determination semi-annually at the sole discretion
of the lender based on the reports of independent petroleum
engineers in accordance with normal and customary natural gas
and oil lending practices.
The prior senior credit facility bore interest at our option at
either LIBOR plus 2.15% or the Bank of America, N.A. prime rate.
We paid a commitment fee on the unused portion of the borrowing
base amount equal to 1/8% per annum. The prior senior credit
facility was collateralized by natural gas and oil properties
representing at least 80% of the present discounted value of our
proved reserves and by a negative pledge on any of our
non-mortgaged properties.
Building Mortgage. On November 15, 2007,
we entered into a note payable in the amount of $20 million
with a lending institution which is fully secured by our
downtown property. The mortgage bears interest at 6.08% ,and
matures November 15, 2022. Payments of principal and
interest in the amount of approximately $0.5 million are
due on a quarterly basis through the maturity date. We expect to
make payments of principal and interest on this note totaling
$1.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively, over the
next twelve months.
Convertible
Preferred Stock
We have 2,184,286 shares of convertible preferred stock
issued and outstanding. Each holder of our convertible preferred
stock is entitled to quarterly cash dividends at the annual rate
of 7.75% of the accreted value of its convertible preferred
stock. At our option, we may choose to increase the accreted
value of the convertible preferred stock in lieu of paying any
quarterly cash dividend. The accreted value is $210 per share as
of September 30, 2007. Each share of convertible preferred
stock is currently convertible into approximately
10.2 shares of common stock at the option of the holder,
subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. In addition,
beginning in the second quarter of 2008, we may convert all
outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock at the same
conversion rate if we have satisfied certain conditions.
Initial
Public Offering
On November 9, 2007, we completed the initial public
offering of our common stock. We sold 28,700,000 shares of
SandRidge common stock, including 4,170,000 shares sold
directly to an entity controlled by Tom L. Ward, at a price of
$26 per share. We received net proceeds of approximately
$705.4 million after deducting underwriting discounts of
approximately $38.3 million and estimated offering expenses
of approximately $2.5 million. In conjunction with the IPO,
the underwriters were granted an option to purchase 3,679,500
additional shares of the our common stock. The underwriters
fully exercised this option and purchased the additional shares
on November 6, 2007. After deducting underwriting discounts
of approximately $5.7 million, we received net proceeds of
approximately $89.9 million from these additional shares.
This offering generated total gross proceeds to us of
approximately $841.8 million and total net proceeds of
approximately $795.3 million to us after deducting total
underwriting discounts of $44.0 million and other offering
expenses estimated to be approximately $2.5 million. After
the payment of offering expenses, we used a portion of the
aggregate net proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness under
our senior credit facility as well as a note payable related to
a recent acquisition. Funds remaining after these repayments
will be used to fund future capital expenditures.
54
Contractual
Obligations
A summary of our contractual obligations as of
September 30, 2007 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder
|
|
|
Payments Due by Year
|
|
|
|
of 2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
After 2011
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3,629
|
|
|
$
|
14,450
|
|
|
$
|
15,664
|
|
|
$
|
11,541
|
|
|
$
|
406,220
|
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,451,504
|
|
Interest on term loan(1)
|
|
|
35,502
|
|
|
|
85,944
|
|
|
|
85,944
|
|
|
|
85,944
|
|
|
|
85,944
|
|
|
|
249,436
|
|
|
|
628,714
|
|
Firm transportation(2)
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
4,592
|
|
|
|
8,625
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
4,525
|
|
|
|
2,707
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,597
|
|
Third party drilling rig commitments(3)
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
|
|
8,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,271
|
|
Dispute settlement payments(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
8,582
|
|
|
|
47,731
|
|
|
|
57,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,523
|
|
|
$
|
120,039
|
|
|
$
|
110,414
|
|
|
$
|
103,743
|
|
|
$
|
506,741
|
|
|
$
|
1,301,759
|
|
|
$
|
2,189,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on interest rates as of November 14, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
We entered into a firm transportation agreement with Questar
Pipeline Company giving us guaranteed capacity on their pipeline
for 10 MmBtu per day at an estimated charge of
$0.9 million per year, with a total commitment of
$9.1 million. In December 2006 we assigned our rights and
obligations to a third party. |
|
(3) |
|
Drilling contracts with third party drilling rig operators at
specified day rates. All of our drilling rig contracts contain
operator performance conditions that allow for pricing
adjustments or early termination for operator nonperformance.
Subsequent to September 30, 2007, the Company signed
short-term contracts (approximately 100 days) for two
additional rigs for total commitments of approximately
$3.8 million. |
|
(4) |
|
In January 2007, we settled a royalty interest dispute and
agreed to pay five installments of $5 million each, plus
interest commencing April 1, 2007. The remaining
installments are due on July 1 of each year commencing
July 1, 2008. |
In connection with the NEG acquisition, we acquired restricted
deposits aggregating $31.9 million. The restricted deposits
represent bank trust and escrow accounts required to be set up
by surety bond underwriters and certain former owners of a
subsidiary on NEGs offshore properties. In accordance with
requirements of MMS, the NEG subsidiary was required to put in
place surety bonds or escrow agreements to provide satisfaction
of its eventual responsibility to plug and abandon wells and
remove structures when certain offshore fields are no longer in
use. As part of the agreement with the surety bond underwriter
or the former owners of the particular fields, bank trust and
escrow accounts were set up and funded based on the terms of the
escrow agreements. Certain amounts are required to be paid upon
receipt of proceeds from production.
In connection with one of the escrow accounts, we are required
to make quarterly deposits to the escrow accounts of
$0.8 million. Additionally, for some of the offshore
properties, we will be required to deposit additional funds in
an escrow account, representing the difference between the
required escrow deposit under the surety bond and actual escrow
deposit balance at various points in time in the future.
Aggregate payments to the escrow accounts are estimated as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2007
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make
assumptions and prepare estimates that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses. We base our
estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions
that we believe are reasonable; however, actual results may
differ. See Consolidated Financial Statements,
Note 1 Summary of Organization and Significant
Accounting Policies for a discussion of our significant
accounting policies.
Proved Reserves. Over 97% of our reserves are
estimated on an annual basis by independent petroleum engineers.
Our estimates of proved reserves are based on the quantities of
natural gas and oil which geological and engineering data
demonstrate, with reasonable certainty, to be recoverable in
future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and
operating conditions. However, there are numerous uncertainties
inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and in
projecting future revenues, rates of production and timing of
development expenditures, including many factors beyond our
control. The estimation process is very complex and relies on
assumptions and subjective interpretations of available
geologic, geophysical, engineering and production data, and the
accuracy of reserve estimates is a function of the quality and
quantity of available data, engineering and geological
interpretation and judgment. In addition, as a result of
volatility and changing market conditions, commodity prices and
future development costs will change from period to period,
causing estimates of proved reserves to change, as well as
causing estimates of future net revenues to change. For the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we revised our
proved reserves upward from prior years reports by
approximately 26.6 Bcfe and 12.3 Bcfe and revised our
proved reserves downward 18.5 Bcfe in 2004 due to proved
undeveloped reserves that were determined to contain greater (or
lesser) quantities than originally estimated, due to market
prices at the end of the applicable period or from production
performance indicating more (or less) reserves in place or
larger (or smaller) reservoir size than initially estimated.
Estimates of proved reserves are key components of our most
significant financial estimates involving our rate for recording
depreciation, depletion and amortization and our full-cost
ceiling limitation. These revisions may be material and could
materially affect our future depletion, depreciation and
amortization expenses.
Method of accounting for natural gas and oil
properties. Our natural gas and oil properties
are accounted for using the full-cost method of accounting. All
direct costs and certain indirect costs associated with the
acquisition, exploration and development of natural gas and oil
properties are capitalized. Exploration and development costs
include dry hole costs, geological and geophysical costs, direct
overhead related to exploration and development activities and
other costs incurred for the purpose of finding natural gas and
oil reserves. Amortization of natural gas and oil properties is
provided using the unit-of-production method based on estimated
proved natural gas and oil reserves. No gains or losses are
recognized upon the sale or disposition of natural gas and oil
properties unless the sale or disposition represents a
significant quantity of natural gas and oil reserves, which
would have a significant impact on the depreciation, depletion
and amortization rate.
In accordance with full-cost accounting rules, capitalized cost
are subject to a limitation. The capitalized cost of natural gas
and oil properties, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion,
and amortization, may not exceed the estimated future net cash
flows from proved natural gas and oil reserves discounted at
10%, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved
properties as adjusted for related tax effects. The full-cost
ceiling limitation is calculated using natural gas and oil
prices in effect as of the balance sheet date and adjusted for
basis or location differential, held constant over
the life of the reserves. If capitalized costs exceed this limit
(the ceiling limitation), the excess must be charged
to expense. Once incurred, a write-down is not reversible at a
later date. We did not have any adjustment to earnings due to
the ceiling limitation for the periods presented herein.
Unevaluated Properties. The balance of
unevaluated properties is comprised of capital costs incurred
for undeveloped acreage, wells and production facilities in
progress and wells pending determination, together with
capitalized interest costs for these projects. These costs are
initially excluded from our amortization base until the outcome
of the project has been determined, or generally, until it is
known whether proved reserves
56
will or will not be assigned to the property. We assess all
items classified as unevaluated property on a quarterly basis
for possible impairment or reduction in value. We assess our
properties on an individual basis or as a group if properties
are individually insignificant. Our assessment includes
consideration of the following factors, among others: intent to
drill; remaining lease term; geological and geophysical
evaluations; drilling results and activity; the assignment of
proved reserves; and the economic viability of development if
proved reserves are assigned. During any period in which these
factors indicate an impairment, the cumulative drilling costs
incurred to date for such property and all or a portion of the
associated leasehold costs are transferred to the full-cost pool
and are then subject to amortization. We estimate that
substantially all of our costs classified as unproved as of the
balance sheet date will be evaluated and transferred within a
four-year period.
Asset Retirement Obligations. Asset retirement
obligations represent the estimated future abandonment costs of
tangible long-lived assets such as platforms, wells, service
assets, pipelines and other facilities. We estimate the fair
value of an assets retirement obligation in the period in
which the liability is incurred, if a reasonable estimate can be
made. We employ a present value technique to estimate the fair
value of an asset retirement obligation, which reflects certain
assumptions, including an inflation rate, our credit-adjusted,
risk-free interest rate, the estimated settlement date of the
liability and the estimated current cost to settle the liability
based on third party quotes and current actual costs. Changes in
timing or to the original estimate of cash flows will result in
changes to the carrying amount of the liability.
Revenue Recognition and Gas Balancing. Oil and
natural gas revenues are recorded when title passes to the
customer, net of royalties, discounts and allowances, as
applicable. We account for oil and natural gas production
imbalances using the sales method, whereby we recognize revenue
on all oil and natural gas sold to our customers notwithstanding
the fact that its ownership may be less than 100% of the oil and
natural gas sold. Liabilities are recorded for imbalances
greater than our proportionate share of remaining estimated oil
and natural gas reserves.
We recognize revenues and expenses generated from
daywork drilling contracts as the services are
performed, since we do not bear the risk of completion of the
well. Under footage and turnkey
contracts, we bear the risk of completion of the well;
therefore, revenues and expenses are recognized when the well is
substantially completed. Under this method, substantial
completion is determined when the well bore reaches the
negotiated depth as stated in the contract. The duration of all
three types of contracts range typically from 20 to
90 days. The entire amount of a loss, if any, is recorded
when the loss is determinable. The costs of uncompleted drilling
contracts include expenses incurred to date on
footage or turnkey contracts, which are
still in process at the end of the period.
We may receive lump-sum fees for the mobilization of equipment
and personnel. Mobilization fees received and costs incurred to
mobilize a rig from one market to another are recognized over
the term of the related drilling contract. The contract terms
are typically from 20 to 90 days.
Revenues of our midstream gas services segment are derived from
providing supply, transportation, balancing and sales services
for producers and wholesale customers on our natural gas
pipelines, as well as other interconnected pipeline systems.
Midstream gas services are primarily undertaken to realize
incremental margins on gas purchased at the wellhead, and
provide value-added services to customers. In general, natural
gas purchased and sold by our midstream gas business is priced
at a published daily or monthly index price. Sales to wholesale
customers typically incorporate a premium for managing their
transmission and balancing requirements. Revenues are recognized
upon delivery of natural gas to customers
and/or when
services are rendered, pricing is determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured.
Revenue from sales of
CO2
is recognized when the product is delivered to the customer. We
recognize service fees related to the transportation of
CO2
as revenue when the related service is provided.
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net. Other
capitalized costs, including drilling equipment, natural gas
gathering and processing equipment, transportation equipment and
other property and equipment are carried at cost. Renewals and
improvements are capitalized while repairs and maintenance are
expensed. Depreciation of drilling equipment is recorded using
the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives.
Depreciation of
57
other property and equipment is computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging
from 3 to 39 years.
Realization of the carrying value of property and equipment is
reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Assets are determined to be impaired if a forecast
of undiscounted estimated future net operating cash flows
directly related to the asset including disposal value if any,
is less than the carrying amount of the asset. If any asset is
determined to be impaired, the loss is measured as the amount by
which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.
An estimate of fair value is based on the best information
available, including prices for similar assets. Changes in such
estimates could cause us to reduce the carrying value of
property and equipment.
When property and equipment components are disposed of, the cost
and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the
accounts and any resulting gain or loss is generally reflected
in operations.
Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are
provided on temporary differences between financial statement
and income tax reporting. Temporary differences are differences
between the amounts of assets and liabilities reported for
financial statement purposes and their tax bases. Deferred tax
assets are recognized for temporary differences that will be
deductible in future years tax returns and for operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance if it is deemed more likely
than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for temporary
differences that will be taxable in future years tax
returns.
Derivative Financial Instruments. To manage
risks related to increases in interest rates and changes in
natural gas and oil prices, we enter into interest rate swaps
and natural gas and oil futures contracts.
We recognize all of our derivative instruments as either assets
or liabilities at fair value. The accounting for changes in the
fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument
depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part
of a hedging relationship, and further, on the type of hedging
relationship. For those derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we designate the
hedging instrument, based on the exposure being hedged, as
either a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. For derivative
instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or
loss is recognized in current earnings during the period of
change. None of our derivatives were designated as hedging
instruments during 2007, 2006 and 2005.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which establishes a formal
framework for measuring fair values of assets and liabilities in
financial statements that are already required by
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) to be measured at fair value.
SFAS No. 157 clarifies guidance in FASB Concepts
Statement (CON) No. 7 which discusses present
value techniques in measuring fair value. No new fair value
measurements are prescribed, and SFAS No. 157 is
intended to codify the several definitions of fair value
included in various accounting standards. However, the
application of this Statement may change current practices for
certain companies. SFAS No. 157 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are
currently evaluating the impact of adopting
SFAS No. 157 on the financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS No. 159), which
permits an entity to choose to measure certain financial assets
and liabilities at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also
revises provisions of SFAS No. 115 that apply to
available-for-sale and trading securities. This statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting
SFAS No. 157 on the financial statements.
58
Effects
of Inflation
The effect of inflation in the natural gas and oil industry is
primarily driven by the prices for natural gas and oil.
Increased commodity prices increase demand for contract drilling
rigs and services, which supports higher drilling rig activity.
This in turn affects the overall demand for our drilling rigs
and the dayrates we can obtain for our contract drilling
services.
Over the last three years, natural gas and oil prices have been
more volatile, and during periods of higher utilization we have
experienced increases in labor cost and the cost of services to
support our drilling rigs.
During this same period, when commodity prices declined, labor
rates did not return to the levels that existed before the
increases. If natural gas prices increase substantially for a
long period, shortages in support equipment (such as drill pipe,
third-party services and qualified labor) may result in
additional increases in our material and labor costs. These
conditions may limit our ability to realize improvements in
operating profits. How inflation will affect us in the future
will depend on additional increases, if any, realized in our
drilling rig rates and the prices we receive for our natural gas
and oil.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The discussion in this section provides information about the
financial instruments we use to manage commodity price and
interest rate volatility. All contracts are financial contracts,
which are settled in cash and do not require the delivery of a
physical quantity to satisfy settlement.
Commodity Price Risk. Our most significant
market risk is the prices we receive for our gas and oil
production, which can be highly volatile. In light of this
historical volatility, we periodically have entered into, and
expect in the future to enter into, derivative arrangements
aimed at reducing the variability of gas and oil prices we
receive for our production. We will from time to time enter into
commodities pricing derivative instruments for a portion of our
anticipated production volumes depending upon our
managements view of opportunities under the then current
market conditions. We do not intend to enter into derivative
instruments that would exceed our expected production volumes
for the period covered by the derivative arrangement. Our
current credit agreement limits our ability to enter into
derivatives transactions to 85% of expected production volumes
from estimated proved reserves. Future credit agreements could
require a minimum level of commodity price hedging.
We use, or may use, a variety of derivative instruments
including collars and fixed-price swaps. These transactions
generally require no cash payment upfront and are settled in
cash at maturity. While this strategy may result in lower
operating profits than if we were not party to these derivative
instruments in times of high natural gas prices, we believe that
the stabilization of prices and protection afforded us by
providing a revenue floor for our production is very beneficial.
For natural gas derivatives, transactions are settled based upon
the New York Mercantile Exchange price of natural gas at the
Waha hub, a West Texas gas marketing and delivery center, on the
final trading day of the month. Settlement for natural gas
derivative contracts occurs in the month following the
production month. We currently do not enter into derivative
arrangements with respect to our oil production, but we may do
so in the future if our oil production increases as a result of
the initiation of our
CO2
tertiary oil recovery operations. Generally, our trade
counterparties are affiliates of the financial institution that
is a party to our credit agreement, although we do have
transactions with counterparties that are not affiliated with
this institution.
While we believe that the gas and oil price derivative
arrangements we enter into are important to our program to
manage price variability for our production, we have not
designated any of our derivative contracts as hedges for
accounting purposes. We record all derivative contracts on the
balance sheet at fair value, which will be significantly
affected by changes in gas and oil prices. We establish fair
value of our derivative contracts by market price quotations of
the derivative contract or, if not available, market price
quotations of derivative contracts with similar terms and
characteristics. When market quotations are not available, we
will estimate the fair value of derivative contracts using
option pricing models that management believes represent its
best estimate. Changes in fair values of our derivative
contracts that are not designated as hedges for accounting
purposes are recognized as unrealized gains and losses in
current period earnings. As a result, our
59
current period earnings may be significantly affected by changes
in fair value of our commodities derivative arrangements. The
gain recognized in earnings, included in operating costs and
expenses, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
2007 was a gain of $16.2 million and $55.2 million,
respectively.
At September 30, 2007, our open commodity derivative
contracts consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fix Price
|
|
|
Fixed price swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2007 - October 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
4,280,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
7.02
|
|
April 2007 - October 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
4,280,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
September 2007 - December 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
1,220,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.88
|
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
920,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
7.60
|
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
920,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
7.82
|
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
920,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
920,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.04
|
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
920,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.77
|
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
920,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
9.04
|
|
November 2007 - June 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
4,860,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
November 2007 - June 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
9,720,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.20
|
|
November 2007 - March 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
1,520,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.51
|
|
January 2008 - June 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
3,640,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
7.99
|
|
January 2008 - June 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
3,640,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
7.99
|
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
3,660,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.23
|
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
3,660,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.48
|
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
3,660,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
May 2008 - August 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
2,460,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.38
|
|
July 2008 - September 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
920,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.23
|
|
July 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
1,840,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.31
|
|
Collars:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2007 - December 2007
|
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
|
|
60,000 Bbls
|
|
|
$
|
50.00 - $84.50
|
|
January 2008 - June 2008
|
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
|
|
42,000 Bbls
|
|
|
$
|
50.00 - $83.35
|
|
July 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
|
|
54,000 Bbls
|
|
|
$
|
50.00 - $82.60
|
|
Waha basis swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2007 - December 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
7,300,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.5925
|
)
|
January 2007 - December 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
14,600,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
April 2007 - October 2007
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
4,280,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.530
|
)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
10,980,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
7,320,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.585
|
)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
7,320,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.59
|
)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
3,660,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.595
|
)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
3,660,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.625
|
)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
7,320,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.635
|
)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
7,320,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6525
|
)
|
May 2008 - August 2008
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
2,460,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
January 2009 - December 2009
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
3,650,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
January 2009 - December 2009
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
3,650,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
January 2009 - December 2009
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
3,650,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4975
|
)
|
60
These derivative instruments have not been designated as hedges.
Interest Rate Risk. We are subject to interest
rate risk on our long-term fixed and variable interest rate
borrowings. Fixed rate debt, where the interest rate is fixed
over the life of the instrument, exposes us (i) to changes
in market interest rates reflected in the fair value of the debt
and (ii) to the risk that we may need to refinance maturing
debt with new debt at a higher rate. Variable rate debt, where
the interest rate fluctuates, exposes us to short-term changes
in market interest rates as our interest obligations on these
instruments are periodically redetermined based on prevailing
market interest rates, primarily LIBOR and the federal funds
rate.
The indebtedness evidenced by our other notes payable related to
our drilling rig fleet and related oil field services equipment,
Sagebrush Pipeline, insurance financing, and other equipment and
vehicles and a portion of our term loan is a fixed-rate debt,
which exposes us to cash-flow risk from market interest rate
changes on these notes. The fair value of that debt will vary as
interest rates change.
Borrowings under our senior credit facility and a portion of our
term loan expose us to certain market risks. We use sensitivity
analysis to determine the impact that market risk exposures may
have on our variable interest rate borrowings. At
September 30, 2007, borrowings outstanding under our senior
credit facility totaled $400 million. Based on the
approximately $350.0 million outstanding balance of the
variable rate portion of our term loan at September 30,
2007, a one percent change in the applicable rate, with all
other variables held constant, would result in a change in our
interest expense of approximately $2.6 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007.
In addition to commodity price derivative arrangements, we may
enter into derivative transactions to fix the interest we pay on
a portion of the money we borrow under our credit agreements. At
September 30, 2007, we are not party to any interest rate
swap instruments. Future interest rate derivative instruments,
if any, are expected to be with affiliates of the financial
institution that are party to our credit agreements.
61
Overview
SandRidge is a rapidly expanding independent natural gas and oil
company concentrating in exploration, development and production
activities. We are focused on expanding our continuing
exploration and exploitation of our significant holdings in an
area of West Texas we refer to as the West Texas Overthrust, or
WTO, a natural gas prone geological region where we
have operated since 1986 that includes the Piñon Field and
our South Sabino and Big Canyon prospects. We intend to add to
our existing reserve and production base in this area by
increasing our development drilling activities in the Piñon
Field and our exploration program in other prospects that we
have identified. As a result of our 2006 acquisitions, including
the NEG acquisition, we have nearly tripled our net acreage
position in the WTO since January 2006. We believe that we are
the largest operator and producer in the WTO and have assembled
the largest position in the area. We also operate significant
interests in the Cotton Valley Trend in East Texas, the Gulf
Coast area, the Gulf of Mexico and the Piceance Basin of
Colorado.
We have assembled an extensive natural gas and oil property base
in which we have identified over 4,500 potential drilling
locations including over 2,600 in the WTO. As of June 30,
2007, our proved reserves were 1,174.0 Bcfe, of which 82%
were natural gas and 97.5% of which were prepared by independent
petroleum engineers. We had 1,469 gross (1,040 net)
producing wells, substantially all of which we operate. As of
September 30, 2007, we had interests in approximately
1,112,231 gross (763,032 net) natural gas and oil leased
acres. We had 30 rigs drilling in the WTO as of
September 30, 2007.
We also operate businesses that are complementary to our primary
exploration, development and production activities, which
provides us with operational flexibility and an advantageous
cost structure. We own a fleet of 32 drilling rigs, five of
which are currently being retrofitted. In addition, we are a
party to a joint venture that owns an additional twelve rigs,
eleven of which are currently operating. We own related oil
field services businesses, gas gathering and treating facilities
and a marketing business. We capture and supply
CO2
to support our tertiary oil recovery projects undertaken by us
or third-parties. We use this
CO2
in our own tertiary oil recovery projects and market it to
third-parties for use in tertiary oil recovery projects. These
assets are primarily located in our primary operating area in
West Texas.
We expanded our management team significantly in 2006. Tom
L. Ward, the co-founder and former President and Chief Operating
Officer of Chesapeake Energy Corporation
(Chesapeake), purchased a significant ownership
interest in us in June 2006 and joined us as Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board. During Mr. Wards
17 year tenure at Chesapeake, Chesapeake became one of the
most active onshore drillers in the United States. From 1998 to
2005, Chesapeake drilled over 6,500 wells. Since
Mr. Ward joined us, we have added eight new executive
officers, substantially all of which have experience at public
exploration and production companies. In July 2006, we relocated
our corporate headquarters to Oklahoma City to take advantage of
the broader market of experienced energy professionals. We have
also added key professionals in exploration, operations, land,
accounting and finance.
Our estimated capital expenditures for 2007 of approximately
$1,200 million (excluding recent acquisitions of
approximately $71 million) include $943 million
allocated to exploration and development (including land and
seismic acquisitions and our tertiary recovery operations),
$115 million allocated to drilling and oil field services
and $103 million allocated to midstream gas operations.
Approximately $704 million of our capital expenditures are
to be spent in our Piñon Field development and our
exploratory projects in the WTO (including land and seismic
acquisitions). Under this capital budget, we plan to drill
approximately 296 gross (256 net) wells in 2007, including
approximately 207 gross (177 net) wells in the WTO. The
actual number of wells drilled in our drilling program and the
amount of our 2007 capital expenditures will be dependent upon
market conditions, availability of capital and drilling and
production results.
The NEG
Acquisition
On November 21, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding
membership interests of NEG from a subsidiary of American Real
Estate Partners, L.P., or AREP, for approximately
$990.4 million in cash, the
62
assumption of $300 million in debt, the receipt of cash of
$21.1 million, and the issuance of 12,842,000 shares
of our common stock valued at approximately $231.2 million.
NEG owned core assets in the Val Verde and Permian Basins of
West Texas, including overlapping or contiguous interests in the
properties that we own in the WTO. Based on reserve reports
prepared as of June 30, 2006 by DeGolyer &
MacNaughton and Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.,
the estimated proved reserves of NEG were 519.7 Bcfe.
Pursuant to our acquisition agreement with AREP, we agreed to
acquire NEG including all of the membership interests in NEG
Holding LLC, but excluding any investment in NEGI. Prior to our
acquisition of NEG:
|
|
|
|
|
NEG acquired the remaining 50% membership interest in NEG
Holding LLC that NEG did not already own by exercising an option
it had to redeem this interest from NEGI for fair value; and
|
|
|
|
NEG distributed to its former parent, a subsidiary of AREP, all
of its investment in National Energy Group, Inc.
(NEGI), consisting of 50.1% of the outstanding
shares of NEGI capital stock and $148 million of
outstanding
103/4% senior
notes due from NEGI.
|
As a result, when we acquired NEG, it owned 100% of the
membership interests of NEG Holding LLC and had no interest or
investment in NEGI. The operating oil and gas assets of NEG are
held in wholly-owned operating subsidiaries of NEG, including
NEG Holding LLC.
We have included elsewhere in this prospectus the combined
financial statements of NEG and subsidiaries, excluding NEGI and
the
103/4% senior
notes due from NEGI, but including NEGIs 50% membership
interest in NEG Holding LLC for certain periods and dates prior
to our acquisition of NEG. Because of the changes effected at
NEG prior to our acquisition, we believe that these combined NEG
financial statements provide a clearer and more relevant
presentation for our investors of the financial condition and
results of operations of the acquired business of NEG than
consolidated financial statements of NEG for these periods and
dates.
Our
Strategy
Our primary objective is to achieve long-term growth and
maximize stockholder value over multiple business cycles by
pursuing the following strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Grow Through Exploration and Aggressive Drilling and
Development of Existing Acreage. We expect to
generate long-term reserve and production growth by exploring
and aggressively drilling and developing our large acreage
position. Our primary exploration and development focus will be
in the WTO, where we have identified over 2,600 potential
drilling locations and had 30 rigs operating as of
September 30, 2007. We have also identified 566 potential
drilling locations in the Cotton Valley Trend in East Texas and
plan to have five rigs running in this region through the end of
2007.
|
|
|
|
Apply Technological Improvements to Our Exploration and
Development Program. We intend to enhance our
drilling success rate and completion efficiency with improved
3-D seismic
acquisition and interpretation technology and applying advanced
drilling, completion and production methods in the exploration
and development of our large acreage position in the WTO. We
believe that this area is under-explored with modern technology
and that the application of this technology has the potential to
result in a higher overall drilling success rate and higher
initial production rates and ultimate well recoveries, thereby
improving overall economics.
|
|
|
|
Seek Opportunistic Acquisitions in Our Core Geographic
Area. Since January 2006, through acquisitions
and leasing activities, we have nearly tripled our net acreage
position in the WTO. We intend to continue to seek other
opportunities to optimize and enhance our exploratory acreage
position in the WTO and other strategic areas.
|
|
|
|
Reduce Costs, Enhance Returns and Maintain Operating
Flexibility by Controlling Drilling Rigs and Midstream
Assets. Our rig fleet enables us to aggressively
develop our own acreage while maintaining the flexibility of a
third-party contract drilling business. We plan to capitalize on
opportunities to utilize our rigs primarily in the WTO, where we
had 30 of our rigs drilling our own wells as of June 30,
2007.
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
By controlling our fleet of drilling rigs and gathering and
treating assets, we believe we will be able to better control
overall costs and maintain a high degree of operational
flexibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capture and Utilize
CO2
for Tertiary Oil Recovery. We intend to
capitalize on our access to
CO2
reserves and
CO2
flooding expertise to pursue enhanced oil recovery in mature oil
fields in West Texas. By utilizing this
CO2
in our own tertiary recovery projects, we expect to recover
additional oil that would have otherwise been abandoned
following traditional waterfloods.
|
Competitive
Strengths
We have a number of strengths that we believe will help us
successfully execute our strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Large Asset Base with Substantial Drilling
Inventory. Our producing properties are
characterized by long-lived predominantly natural gas reserves
with established production profiles. Our estimated proved
reserves of 1,174.0 Bcfe as of June 30, 2007 had a
proved reserves to production ratio of approximately
19 years. Our core area of operations in the WTO has
expanded to 581,961 gross (480,721 net) acres as of
September 30, 2007. We have identified over 2,600 potential
drilling locations in the WTO and believe that we will be able
to expand the number of drilling locations in the remainder of
the WTO through exploratory drilling and our use of
3-D seismic
technology.
|
|
|
|
Geographically Concentrated Exploration and Development
Operations. We intend to focus our drilling and
development operations in the near term on the WTO to fully
exploit this unique geological area. The WTO was created by the
collision of the ancestral North and South American continents,
which fractured and thrust the reservoir rock to come to rest in
repeating layers. We believe the geological environment of the
WTO and the height of the prospective pay zones create
opportunities for significant conventional accumulations of
natural gas and oil. To a lesser extent, we will also focus on
the highly prolific Cotton Valley Trend in East Texas. This
geographic concentration allows us to establish economies of
scale in both drilling and production operations to achieve
lower production costs and generate increased cash flows from
our producing properties. We believe our concentrated acreage
position will enable us to organically grow our reserves and
production for the next several years.
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team Focused on Delivering Long-term
Stockholder Value. During 2006, we significantly
expanded our management team when Tom L. Ward, co-founder and
former president of Chesapeake, purchased a significant interest
in us and became our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. We
also hired a new chief financial officer and three additional
executive vice presidents. Our nine executive officers and 27
senior executives average over 23 years of experience
working in or servicing the natural gas and oil industry. Our
management team, board of directors and employees owned over 35%
of our capital stock on a fully-diluted basis as of
November 30, 2007, which we believe aligns their objectives
with those of our stockholders.
|
|
|
|
High Degree of Operational Control. We operate
over 95% of our production in the WTO, East Texas and the Gulf
Coast area, which permits us to manage our operating costs and
better control capital expenditures and the timing of
development and exploitation activities.
|
|
|
|
Large Modern Fleet of Drilling Rigs. We own a
fleet of 32 drilling rigs, five of which are currently being
retrofitted. In addition, we are a party to a joint venture that
owns an additional twelve rigs, eleven of which are currently
operating. By controlling a large, modern and more efficient
drilling fleet, we can develop our existing reserves and explore
for new reserves on a more economic basis.
|
Our
Businesses and Primary Operations
Exploration
and Production
We explore for, develop and produce natural gas and oil
reserves, with a focus on increasing our reserves and production
in the WTO. We operate substantially all of our wells in the
WTO. We also have significant
64
operated leasehold positions in the Cotton Valley Trend in East
Texas and the Gulf Coast area, as well as other non-core
operating areas.
The following table identifies certain information concerning
our exploration and production business as of September 30,
2007 unless otherwise noted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
PV-10 (in
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Reserves/
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
|
(Bcfe)(1)
|
|
|
millions)(1)(2)
|
|
|
(Mmcfe/d)(3)
|
|
|
Production(1)
|
|
|
Acreage
|
|
|
Acreage
|
|
|
Locations(1)
|
|
|
Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WTO
|
|
|
648.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,190.9
|
|
|
|
69.1
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
(4)
|
|
|
581,961
|
|
|
|
480,721
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
East Texas
|
|
|
156.3
|
|
|
|
310.2
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
48,606
|
|
|
|
32,557
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
Gulf Coast
|
|
|
105.7
|
|
|
|
416.4
|
|
|
|
44.2
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
53,464
|
|
|
|
34,765
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf of Mexico
|
|
|
57.3
|
|
|
|
176.7
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
73,614
|
|
|
|
36,770
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Other West Texas
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
111.2
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
23,059
|
|
|
|
22,140
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
PetroSource
|
|
|
120.8
|
|
|
|
243.8
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
220.6
|
|
|
|
9,064
|
|
|
|
8,195
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Piceance Basin
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
40,334
|
|
|
|
15,686
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
Other
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
110.5
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
282,129
|
|
|
|
132,198
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,174.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,558.8
|
|
|
|
176.7
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
1,112,231
|
|
|
|
763,032
|
|
|
|
4,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimated net proved reserves, PV-10 and identified potential
drilling locations are as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
PV-10 generally differs from Standardized Measure of Discounted
Net Cash Flows, or Standardized Measure, which is measured only
at fiscal year end, because it does not include the effects of
income taxes on future net revenues. For a reconciliation of
PV-10 to
Standardized Measure as of December 31, 2006, see
Summary Historical Operating and Reserve Data. Our
Standardized Measure was $1,440.2 million at
December 31, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents average daily net production for the third quarter
2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Our proved reserves to production ratio in the WTO is
significantly higher than our other areas of operation because
of the high volume of our proved undeveloped reserves in this
area. We expect this ratio to decrease as our production in the
WTO increases. |
West
Texas Overthrust (WTO)
We have drilled and developed natural gas in the WTO since 1986.
This area is located in Pecos and Terrell Counties in West Texas
and is associated with the Marathon-Ouachita fold and thrust
belt that extends east-northeast across the United States into
the Appalachian Mountain Region. The WTO was created by the
collision of the ancestral North American and South American
continents resulting in source rock and reservoir rock,
including potential hydrocarbon traps, becoming thrusted upon
one another in multiple layers (imbricate stacking) along the
leading edge of the WTO. The collision and thrusting resulted in
the reservoir rock becoming highly fractured, increasing the
likelihood of conventional natural gas and oil accumulations in
the reservoir rock and creating a unique geological setting in
North America.
The primary reservoir rocks in the WTO range in depth from 2,000
to 10,000 feet and range in geologic age from the Permian
to the Devonian. The imbricate stacking of these conventional
gas-prone reservoirs provides for multi-pay exploration and
development opportunities. Despite this, the WTO has
historically been largely under-explored due primarily to the
remoteness and lack of infrastructure in the region, as well as
historical limitations of conventional subsurface geological and
geophysical methods. However, several fields including our
prolific Piñon Field have been discovered. These fields
have produced more than 255 Bcfe from less than
410 wells through September 30, 2007. We believe our
access to and control of the necessary
65
infrastructure combined with application of modern seismic
techniques will allow us to identify further exploration and
development opportunities in the WTO.
In May 2007, we began the first phase of
3-D seismic
data acquisition in the WTO. This is the first of six phases
planned over the next three years to acquire 1,300 square
miles of modern
3-D seismic
data in the WTO. We believe this enhanced
3-D seismic
program may identify structural details of potential reservoirs,
thus lowering risk of exploratory drilling and improving
completion efficiency. The first two phases of the seismic
program will cover 360 square miles and should both be
completed by the end of 2007.
We have aggressively acquired leasehold acreage in the WTO,
nearly tripling our position since January 2006. As of
September 30, 2007 we owned 581,961 gross (480,721
net) acres in the WTO, substantially all of which are along the
leading edge of the WTO.
Piñon Field. The Piñon Field,
located in Pecos County, is our most significant producing
field, and accounts for 55% of our proved reserve base as of
June 30, 2007 and approximately 75% of our 2007 exploration
and development budget (including land and seismic
acquisitions). The Piñon Field lies along the leading edge
of the WTO. The primary reservoirs are the Wolfcamp sands
(average depth of 2,500 to 3,500 feet), the Tesnus sands
(average depth of 3,700 to 4,750 feet), the Upper Caballos
chert (average depth of 5,500 feet), and the Lower Caballos
chert (average depth of 7,300 to 10,000 feet).
As of June 30, 2007, our estimated proved natural gas and
oil reserves in the Piñon Field were 648.3 Bcfe, 66%
of which were proved undeveloped reserves. This field has
produced more than 205 Bcfe through September 30, 2007
and currently produces in excess of 118 gross Mmcfe
per day.
Our interests in the Piñon Field include 351 producing
wells as of September 30, 2007. We had an 84.4% average
working interest in the producing area of Piñon Field and
were running 30 drilling rigs in the Piñon Field as of
September 30, 2007. We estimate that we will drill
approximately 207 wells in the field during 2007, the
majority of which will be development wells. As of June 30,
2007, we have identified over 2,600 potential well locations in
the Piñon Field, including 406 proved undeveloped drilling
locations.
West Texas Overthrust Prospects. Through our
exploratory drilling program, we have identified two prospect
areas in the WTO, the South Sabino Prospect and the Big Canyon
Prospect areas on which we will drill exploratory wells in late
2007 or early 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
South Sabino Prospect Area. The South Sabino
prospect area is located approximately twelve miles east of the
Piñon Field. We have drilled two wells which have
encountered the Caballos chert and hydrocarbons in zones less
than 7,000 feet deep. Those wells were selected using
2-D seismic
and limited subsurface well control. The wells appear to be on
trend with the Piñon Field and are structurally higher
against one of several thrust faults that make up the WTO. We
began the first phase of our
3-D seismic
program in this area in 2007 and may drill additional wells in
late 2007 following the integration of this data and new
subsurface well control.
|
|
|
|
Big Canyon Prospect Area. Located
approximately 20 miles east of the Piñon Field along
the WTO, this prospect area represents potential opportunities
for future development. The key well, Big Canyon Ranch
106-1, was
drilled by a third party to a depth of 24,075 feet and was
abandoned in December 1993 after testing gas from the Tesnus
sands and Caballos chert. We plan to conduct a
3-D seismic
survey over the Big Canyon prospect area as part of
Phase II of our
3-D seismic
program in 2007. Exploratory wells may be planned in late 2007
and early 2008 to further evaluate both the Tesnus and the
Caballos in a location structurally updip to the Big Canyon
Ranch 106-1 well.
|
66
West Texas Overthrust Development. The
following table provides information concerning development in
the WTO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rigs
|
|
Net PUD
|
|
|
Gross PUD
|
|
|
Gross PUD
|
|
|
Total Gross
|
|
|
Gross 2007
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
2006 Year
|
|
|
Working
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
Budget
|
|
|
End Rigs
|
|
|
at 3Q
|
|
(Bcfe)(1)
|
|
|
(Bcfe)(1)
|
|
|
Locations(1)
|
|
|
Locations(1)
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
|
(in millions)(2)
|
|
|
Working
|
|
|
2007 End
|
|
|
|
431.1
|
|
|
|
675.2
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of June 30, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes capital expenditures related to land and seismic
acquisitions. |
East
Texas Cotton Valley Trend
We own significant natural gas and oil interests in the natural
gas bearing Cotton Valley Trend in East Texas, which covers
parts of East Texas and Northern Louisiana. We held interests in
48,606 gross (32,557 net) acres in East Texas as of
June 30, 2007. At September 30, 2007, our estimated
net proved reserves in East Texas were 156.3 Bcfe, with net
production of approximately 26.8 Mmcfe per day. We intend
to target the tight sand reservoirs of the Cotton Valley, Pettit
and Travis Peak formations at depths of 6,500 to
10,500 feet. These sands are typically distributed over a
large area, which has led to a near 100% success rate in this
area. Due to the tight nature of the reservoirs, significant
hydraulic fracture stimulation is required to obtain commercial
production rates and efficiently drain the reservoir. Production
in this area is generally characterized as long-lived, with
wells having high initial production and decline rates that
stabilize at lower levels after several years. Moreover, area
operators continue to focus on infill development drilling as
many areas have been down spaced to 80 acres per well, with
some areas down spaced to as little as 40 acres per well.
Recently, operators have begun drilling horizontal wells and we
are monitoring their success. Thirty-seven wells have been
drilled in the nine months of 2007. We plan to have five rigs
running in this region for the remainder of 2007 with an
additional 12 wells planned.
Gulf
Coast
We own natural gas and oil interests in 53,464 gross
(34,765 net) acres in the Gulf Coast area as of
September 30, 2007, which encompasses the large coastal
plain from the southernmost tip of Texas through the southern
portion of Louisiana. As of June 30, 2007, our estimated
net proved reserves in the Gulf Coast area were 105.7 Bcfe,
with net production of approximately 35.0 Mmcfe per day.
This is a predominantly gas prone, multi-pay, geologically
complex area with significant faulting and compartmentalized
reservoirs where
3-D seismic
and other advanced exploration technologies are critical to our
efforts. This area is comprised of sediments ranging from
Cretaceous through Tertiary age and is productive from very
shallow depths of several thousand feet to depths in excess of
18,000 feet. We target shallower geological formations such
as the Frio and the Miocene, as well as deeper horizons such as
Wilcox and Vicksburg. Operations in this area are generally
characterized as being higher risk and higher potential than in
our other core areas, with successful wells typically having
higher initial production rates with steeper declines and
shorter production lives. Drilling cost per well also tends to
be significantly higher than in our other areas due to the
increased depth and complexity of wellbore conditions. Three
wells have been drilled in the first nine months of 2007. We are
evaluating additional drilling opportunities for the remainder
of 2007.
Other
Areas
Gulf of Mexico. We own natural gas and oil
interests in 73,614 gross (36,770 net) acres in State and
federal waters off the coast of Texas and Louisiana as of
September 30, 2007. At June 30, 2007 our estimated net
proved reserves were 57.3 Bcfe, with net production of
approximately 20.5 Mmcfe per day for the month of June
2007. The water depth ranges from 30 feet to
1,100 feet and activity extends from the coast to more than
100 miles offshore. The Gulf of Mexico is one of the
premier producing basins in the United States and is an area
where we have achieved value-added growth through exploitation
and exploration. Our production will range in depth from several
thousand feet to in excess of 17,000 feet. The reservoir
rocks range in age from the Plio-Pleistocene through the
Oligocene. Typical Gulf of Mexico reservoirs have high porosity
and
67
permeability and wells historically flow at prolific rates.
Overall, the Gulf of Mexico is known as an area of high quality
3-D seismic
acquisition. Our major areas of activity will include the blocks
in East Breaks and High Island areas that are located off the
Texas coast, and the East Cameron area located off the Louisiana
coast. In most cases in this area we own non-operating interests
with larger companies such as Chevron Corporation, BP plc and
Apache Corporation. We are currently evaluating our future
drilling plans and intend to manage our investment in this area
to maximize returns without significantly increasing future
capital expenditures.
Piceance Basin. The Piceance Basin in
northwestern Colorado is a sedimentary basin consisting of
multiple productive sandstone formations in one of the
countrys most prolific natural gas regions. We entered the
Piceance Basin in 1993 with the purchase of leasehold interests
predominantly located on federal lands. We acquired this
position in order to utilize the experience we had gained in
underbalanced drilling and foam fracture simulations in West
Texas. Initially, development of these natural gas reserves was
limited due to high drilling costs and complex completion
requirements. However, new drilling and completion technologies
now enable successful development in this area.
We are currently evaluating wells we have drilled, but not
completed, on the western portion of our acreage block. At
September 30, 2007, we had identified 828 potential
drilling locations on the eastern portion of our
40,334 gross (15,686 net) acres. We will continue to
evaluate our position in 2007 and intend to manage our
investment in this area to maximize returns without
significantly increasing future capital expenditures.
Other West Texas. Our other non-tertiary West
Texas assets include our Brooklaw field and the Goldsmith Adobe
Unit in the Permian Basin. As of September 30, 2007, we own
23,059 gross (22,140 net) acres in these prospects. As of
June 30, 2007, our estimated net proved reserves were
27.0 Bcfe. We have identified 68 potential drilling
locations in these fields, including 56 proved undeveloped
locations, and intend to drill approximately 17 development
wells in 2007.
Other. We own interests in properties in the
Arkoma and Anadarko Basins and other non-strategic areas. As of
September 30, 2007, we hold interests in 282,129 gross
(132,198 net) leasehold and option acres in these non-strategic
areas.
Tertiary
Oil Recovery
Wellman Unit. The Wellman Unit is part of our
tertiary oil recovery operations. The Wellman Field, located in
Terry County, was discovered in 1950 and produces from the
Canyon Reef limestone formation of Permian age from an average
depth of 9,500 feet. The Wellman Unit is on the western
edge of the Horseshoe Atoll, a geologic feature in the northern
part of the Midland Basin. There are approximately 110 separate
fields that are contained within this feature, including seven
existing
CO2
floods. The Wellman Unit covers approximately 2,120 acres,
1,200 of which are well-suited for both water and
CO2
floods. The Wellman Field has been partially
CO2
flooded and water flooded to produce 79.9 Mmboe to date. We
recently re-initiated injection of
CO2,
and our injection rate is expected to reach 32.0 Mmcf per
day in 2007 and to average 30.9 Mmcf per day over the next
10 years. As of June 30, 2007, net proved reserves
attributable to the Wellman Unit were 9.3 Mmboe. We also
own a
CO2
recycling plant at this unit with a capacity of 28 Mmcf per
day. The plant includes 6,000 horsepower of
CO2
compression and 4,850 horsepower of processing compression,
which is sufficient to handle the recycling of the
CO2
that will be produced in association with the production of
these reserves.
George Allen Unit. The George Allen Unit,
located in Gaines County, covers 800 gross acres in the
George Allen Field and produces from the San Andres
formation from an average depth of 4,950 feet, in the
George Allen Field. An additional 320 acres adjacent to the
unit to the south have also been leased. The field is located
within the greater Wasson area which contains seven active
CO2
floods including the largest in the world, the Denver Unit. The
George Allen Unit has produced 0.5 Mmboe to date, but it
also contains a significant transition zone which has been
proven to be a tertiary oil target at the nearby Denver Unit. We
are currently moving ahead with the implementation of a nine
pattern pilot program which is expected to begin
CO2
injection in the third quarter of 2007. As of June 30,
2007, net proved reserves attributable to the George
68
Allen Unit were 8.2 Mmboe. The
CO2
injection rate is expected to reach 15 Mmcf per day by end
of year 2007.
South Mallet Unit. The South Mallet Unit,
located in Hockley County, covers 3,540 gross acres in the
Slaughter/Levelland Field complex and produces from the
San Andres formation from an average depth of
5,000 feet. These fields are some of the largest in West
Texas and currently have ten active
CO2
floods and four more at various stages of readiness. The South
Mallet Unit has produced 27.8 Mmboe to date. We plan to
begin injection of
CO2
in 2009, and we expect to reach an injection rate of
approximately 7,100 Mcf per day by the beginning of 2010.
As of June 30, 2007, net proved reserves attributable to
the South Mallet Unit were 2.5 Mmboe.
Jones Ranch Area. Several miles west of the
George Allen Unit, in Gaines County, PetroSource has acquired
various leases in the Jones Ranch Area. These leases produce
from various depths and formations from approximately
2,400 gross acres. We are evaluating these leases for both
conventional development and tertiary potential.
Proved
Reserves
The following tables present our historical estimated net proved
natural gas and oil reserves and the present value of our
estimated proved reserves as of December 31, 2005 and 2006
and June 30, 2007. The
PV-10 and
Standardized Measure shown in the table are not intended to
represent the current market value of our estimated market value
or our estimated natural gas and oil reserves. At June 30, 2007
approximately 62% of our proved reserves were proved undeveloped
reserves. Based on our current drilling schedule, we estimate
that 97% of our current proved undeveloped reserves will be
developed by 2011 and all of our current proved undeveloped
reserves will be developed by 2012.
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent oil and
gas consultants, have prepared the reports of proved reserves of
natural gas and crude oil for our net interest in oil and gas
properties, which constitute approximately 92% of our total
proved reserves as of December 31, 2006 and 87.2% of our
total proved reserves as of June 30, 2007. DeGolyer and
MacNaughton prepared the reports of proved reserves for
PetroSource, which constitute approximately 7% of our total
proved reserves as of December 31, 2006 and 10.3% of our
total proved reserves as of June 30, 2007. Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc. and DeGolyer and MacNaughton
prepared independent engineering reports for 97.5% of our total
reserves represented by SandRidge on June 30, 2007 and are
included exactly as represented by the respective firms. The
remaining 2.5% of the proved reserves were estimated internally
by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Estimated Proved Reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf)(2)
|
|
|
237.4
|
|
|
|
850.7
|
|
|
|
967.6
|
|
Oil (MmBbls)
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
Total (Bcfe)
|
|
|
300.0
|
|
|
|
1,001.8
|
|
|
|
1,174.0
|
|
PV-10 (in
millions)
|
|
$
|
733.3
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
1,734.3
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
2,558.8
|
(3)
|
Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows
(in millions)(4)
|
|
$
|
499.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,440.2
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our estimated proved reserves and the future net revenues,
PV-10, and
Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows were
determined using end of the period prices for natural gas and
oil that we realized as of December 31, 2005,
December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2007, which were $8.40 per
Mcf of natural gas and $54.04 per barrel of oil at
December 31, 2005, $5.64 per Mcf of natural gas and $57.75
per barrel of oil at December 31, 2006, and $6.70 per Mcf
of natural gas and $63.78 per barrel of oil at June 30, 2007. |
69
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Given the nature of our natural gas reserves, a significant
amount of our production, primarily in the WTO, contains natural
gas high in
CO2
content. These figures are net of volumes of
CO2
in excess of pipeline quality specifications. |
|
(3) |
|
PV-10 is a
non-GAAP financial measure and represents the present value of
estimated future cash inflows from proved natural gas and oil
reserves, less future development and production costs,
discounted at 10% per annum to reflect timing of future cash
flows and using pricing assumptions in effect at the end of the
period.
PV-10
differs from Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows
because it does not include the effects of income taxes and
other items on future net revenues. Neither
PV-10 nor
Standardized Measure represent an estimate of fair market value
of our natural gas and oil properties.
PV-10 is
used by the industry and by our management as an arbitrary
reserve asset value measure to compare against past reserve
bases and the reserve bases of other business entities that are
not dependent on the taxpaying status of the entity. The
following tables provide a reconciliation of our Standardized
Measure to
PV-10: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows
|
|
$
|
499.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,440.2
|
|
Present value of future income tax and other discounted at 10%
|
|
|
234.1
|
|
|
|
294.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PV-10
|
|
$
|
733.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,734.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows represents
the present value of estimated future cash inflows from proved
natural gas and oil reserves, less future development and
production costs, and income tax expenses, discounted at 10% per
annum to reflect timing of future cash flows and using the same
pricing assumptions as were used to calculate
PV-10.
Standardized Measure differs from
PV-10
because Standardized Measure includes the effect of future
income taxes and other items. |
|
(5) |
|
Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows is only
calculated at fiscal year end under applicable accounting rules. |
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of
crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids which geological
and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing
economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of
the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of
changes in existing prices provided only by contractual
arrangements, but not on escalations based upon future
conditions.
Reservoirs are considered proved if economic producibility is
supported by either actual production or conclusive formation
test. The area of a reservoir considered proved includes
(i) that portion delineated by drilling and defined by
gas-oil
and/or
oil-water contacts, if any, and (ii) the immediately
adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which can be reasonably
judged as economically productive on the basis of available
geological and engineering data. In the absence of information
on fluid contacts, the lowest known structural occurrence of
hydrocarbons controls the lower proved limit of the reservoir.
Reserves which can be produced economically through application
of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injection) are
included in the proved classification when successful testing by
a pilot project, or the operation of an installed program in the
reservoir, provides support for the engineering analysis on
which the project or program was based.
Estimates of proved reserves do not include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
oil that may become available from known reservoirs but is
classified separately as indicated additional reserves;
|
|
|
|
crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, the recovery of
which is subject to reasonable doubt because of uncertainty as
to geology, reservoir characteristics, or economic factors;
|
|
|
|
crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may occur
in undrilled prospects; and
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may be
recovered from oil shales, coal, gilsonite and other such
sources.
|
Of our total proved reserves at June 30, 2007,
20.1 million barrels of oil equivalent, or 10.3% of our
total proved reserves, are attributable to our tertiary oil
recovery projects using
CO2
injection. Our reserve report of June 30, 2007 estimates
total future costs of recovering proved reserves from tertiary
oil recovery projects, including estimated capital costs and
taxes, of approximately $30.04 per barrel of oil equivalent.
Production
and Price History
The following tables set forth information regarding our net
production of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids and
certain price and cost information for each of the periods
indicated. Because of the relatively high volumes of
CO2
produced with natural gas in certain areas of the WTO, our
reported sales and reserves volumes and the related unit prices
received for natural gas in these areas are reported net of
CO2
volumes stripped at the gas plants. The gas plant fees for
removing
CO2
for our high
CO2
natural gas have been taken into account in our lease operating
expenses as processing and gathering fees. In all other areas,
natural gas sales are delivered to sales points with
CO2
levels within pipeline specifications and thus are included in
sales and reserves volumes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Production Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Mmcf)
|
|
|
6,708
|
|
|
|
6,873
|
|
|
|
13,410
|
|
|
|
6,856
|
|
|
|
35,148
|
|
Oil (MBbls)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
Combined Equivalent Volumes (Mmcfe)
|
|
|
6,930
|
|
|
|
7,305
|
|
|
|
15,342
|
|
|
|
7,275
|
|
|
|
43,793
|
|
Average Daily Combined Equivalent Volumes (Mmcfe/d)
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Average Prices(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
|
$
|
6.54
|
|
|
$
|
6.19
|
|
|
$
|
6.14
|
|
|
$
|
6.56
|
|
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$
|
34.03
|
|
|
$
|
48.19
|
|
|
$
|
56.61
|
|
|
$
|
61.89
|
|
|
$
|
61.67
|
|
Combined Equivalent (per Mcfe)
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
|
$
|
6.63
|
|
|
$
|
6.60
|
|
|
$
|
6.38
|
|
|
$
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reported prices represent actual prices for the periods
presented and do not give effect to hedging transactions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expenses per Mcfe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Processing and gathering(1)
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
Other lease operating expenses
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease operating expenses
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
|
|
$
|
2.97
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes costs attributable to gas treatment to remove
CO2
and other impurities from our high
CO2
natural gas. |
71
Productive
Wells
The following table sets forth information at September 30,
2007, relating to the productive wells in which we owned a
working interest as of that date. Productive wells consist of
producing wells and wells capable of producing, including
natural gas wells awaiting pipeline connections to commence
deliveries and oil wells awaiting connection to production
facilities. Gross wells are the total number of producing wells
in which we have an interest, and net wells are the sum of our
fractional working interests owned in gross wells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
WTO
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
East Texas
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Gulf Coast
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf of Mexico
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other West Texas
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
PetroSource
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Piceance Basin
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Other
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
and Undeveloped Acreage
The following table sets forth information at September 30,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
|
Acreage(1)
|
|
|
Acreage(2)
|
|
Area
|
|
Gross(3)
|
|
|
Net(4)
|
|
|
Gross(3)
|
|
|
Net(4)
|
|
|
WTO
|
|
|
11,741
|
|
|
|
8,854
|
|
|
|
570,220
|
|
|
|
471,867
|
|
East Texas
|
|
|
29,084
|
|
|
|
25,817
|
|
|
|
19,522
|
|
|
|
6,740
|
|
Gulf Coast
|
|
|
39,438
|
|
|
|
24,678
|
|
|
|
14,026
|
|
|
|
10,087
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf of Mexico
|
|
|
73,614
|
|
|
|
36,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other West Texas
|
|
|
13,680
|
|
|
|
13,544
|
|
|
|
9,379
|
|
|
|
8,598
|
|
PetroSource
|
|
|
9,064
|
|
|
|
8,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piceance Basin
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
38,534
|
|
|
|
15,234
|
|
Other
|
|
|
84,258
|
|
|
|
41,770
|
|
|
|
197,871
|
|
|
|
90,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
262,679
|
|
|
|
160,079
|
|
|
|
849,552
|
|
|
|
602,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Developed acres are acres spaced or assigned to productive wells. |
|
(2) |
|
Undeveloped acres are acres on which wells have not been drilled
or completed to a point that would permit the production of
commercial quantities of oil or natural gas, regardless of
whether such acreage contains proved reserves. |
|
(3) |
|
A gross acre is an acre in which a working interest is owned.
The number of gross acres is the total number of acres in which
a working interest is owned. |
|
(4) |
|
A net acre is deemed to exist when the sum of the fractional
ownership working interests in gross acres equals one. The
number of net acres is the sum of the fractional working
interests owned in gross acres expressed as whole numbers and
fractions thereof. |
72
Many of the leases comprising the acreage set forth in the table
above will expire at the end of their respective primary terms
unless production from the leasehold acreage has been
established prior to such date, in which event the lease will
remain in effect until the cessation of production. We generally
have been able to obtain extensions of the primary terms of our
federal leases when we have been unable to obtain drilling
permits due to a pending Environmental Assessment, Environmental
Impact Statement or related legal challenge. The following table
sets forth as of September 30, 2007 the expiration periods
of the gross and net acres that are subject to leases in the
acreage summarized in the above table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acres Expiring
|
|
Twelve Months Ending
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
46,068
|
|
|
|
35,074
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
165,302
|
|
|
|
134,500
|
|
December 31, 2010 and later
|
|
|
564,843
|
|
|
|
395,187
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
336,018
|
|
|
|
198,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,112,231
|
|
|
|
763,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Leases remaining in effect until the cessation of development
efforts or cessation of production on the developed portion of
the particular lease. |
Drilling
Results
The following table sets forth information with respect to wells
we completed during the periods indicated. The information
should not be considered indicative of future performance, nor
should it be assumed that there is necessarily any correlation
between the number of productive wells drilled, quantities of
reserves found or economic value. Productive wells are those
that produce commercial quantities of hydrocarbons, regardless
of whether they produce a reasonable rate of return.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Development:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Exploratory:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
132.3
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
73
Drilling
Rigs
The following table sets forth information with respect to the
drilling on our acreage as of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
Area
|
|
Owned(1)
|
|
|
Third Party
|
|
|
Owned(1)
|
|
|
Third Party
|
|
|
WTO
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
East Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Gulf Coast
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes both rigs owned by Lariat, our wholly owned subsidiary,
and by Larclay, a joint venture. |
Marketing
and Customers
Through Integra Energy, our subsidiary, we market our natural
gas production in accordance with standard industry practices.
Each month we develop a portfolio of natural gas sales by
arranging for a percentage of Integra Energys natural gas
to be sold on a first of the month index price basis with the
remaining volume sold on a daily swing basis at current market
rates. Most of the natural gas is sold on a month-to-month
basis, and any longer term or evergreen agreements that we are
subject to provide pricing provisions that allow us to receive
monthly market area based prices. During the year ended
December 31, 2006, we sold natural gas to 20 different
purchasers.
Our top five natural gas purchasers of our WTO production for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and each
companys approximate percentage of total sales during that
period are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Purchasers
|
|
%
|
|
|
ANP Funding I, LLC
|
|
|
26.4%
|
|
Magnus Energy Marketing, Ltd.
|
|
|
17.8%
|
|
Atmos Energy Corporation
|
|
|
13.9%
|
|
El Paso Industrial Energy, LP
|
|
|
10.4%
|
|
Southern Union Gas Services, Ltd.
|
|
|
10.1%
|
|
Title
to Properties
As is customary in the natural gas and oil industry, we
initially conduct only a cursory review of the title to our
properties on which we do not have proved reserves. Prior to the
commencement of drilling operations on those properties, we
conduct a thorough title examination and perform curative work
with respect to significant defects. To the extent title
opinions or other investigations reflect title defects on those
properties, we are typically responsible for curing any title
defects at our expense. We generally will not commence drilling
operations on a property until we have cured any material title
defects on such property. In addition, prior to completing an
acquisition of producing natural gas and oil leases, we perform
title reviews on the most significant leases, and depending on
the materiality of properties, we may obtain a title opinion or
review previously obtained title opinions. To date, we have
obtained title opinions on substantially all of our producing
properties and believe that we have satisfactory title to our
producing properties in accordance with standards generally
accepted in the natural gas and oil industry. However, we have
drilled wells in the Piceance Basin, which are subject to
litigation that may affect that property. Please read
Legal Proceedings. Our natural gas and
oil properties are subject to customary royalty and other
interests, liens for current taxes and other burdens which we
believe do not materially interfere with the use of or affect
our carrying value of the properties.
74
Drilling
and Oil Field Services Operations
We provide drilling and related oil field services to our
exploration and production business and to third-parties in both
West Texas and the Piceance Basin.
Drilling
Operations
We drill for our own account in the WTO through our drilling and
oil field services subsidiary, Lariat Services, Inc. In
addition, we also drill wells for other natural gas and oil
companies, primarily located in the West Texas region. We
believe that drilling with our own rigs allows us to control
costs and maintain operating flexibility. We are a party to a
joint venture, Larclay, with CWEI, where we currently have
eleven rigs working for our own account and CWEI. Larclay
has one rig that has currently not been assembled. We believe
that we are one of the largest privately held drilling
contractors in the United States on a footage drilled basis. We
believe that our ownership of drilling rigs and our related oil
field services will continue to be a catalyst of our growth.
Currently, 28 of our rigs are working on properties operated by
us, and we are operating 38 rigs, including eleven of the twelve
rigs owned by Larclay. Our rig fleet is designed to drill in our
specific areas of operation and have an average horsepower of
over 800 and an average depth capacity of greater than
10,500 feet.
In 2005, we ordered 22 rigs from Chinese manufacturers for an
aggregate purchase price of $126.4 million, which include
the cost of assembling and equipping the rigs in the
U.S. Due in part to the shortage of experienced drilling
employees and various operational challenges, we have deemed it
prudent to retrofit five Chinese rigs to a conventional
operation. This involves the replacement of the Chinese trailer
mounted unit with the traditional box-on-box substructure,
cantilever mast and hand-brake drawworks. We anticipate the
retrofit will be completed in the second quarter 2008.
The table below identifies certain information concerning our
contract drilling operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Number of operational rigs owned at end of period
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
27
|
(3)
|
Average number of operational rigs owned during the period
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
26
|
(3)
|
Average number of rigs utilized
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
Utilization rate
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
Average drilling revenue per day(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
73,023
|
|
|
$
|
164,495
|
|
|
$
|
373,051
|
|
|
$
|
358,867
|
|
|
$
|
409,541
|
|
Average drilling revenue per rig per day(2)
|
|
$
|
9,128
|
|
|
$
|
11,503
|
|
|
$
|
17,034
|
|
|
$
|
17,089
|
|
|
$
|
17,302
|
|
Total footage drilled (feet in thousands)
|
|
|
635,684
|
|
|
|
1,749,700
|
|
|
|
2,124,079
|
|
|
|
1,746,763
|
|
|
|
1,440,247
|
|
Number of wells drilled
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the total revenues from our contract drilling
operations divided by the total number of days our drilling rigs
were used during the period. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include revenues for related rental equipment. |
|
(3) |
|
Does not include five rigs being retrofitted as of June 30,
2007. |
75
The table below identifies certain information concerning our
drilling rigs as of September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating for
|
|
|
Operating for
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Operational
|
|
|
SandRidge
|
|
|
Third Parties
|
|
|
Lariat
|
|
|
32
|
(1)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Larclay
|
|
|
12
|
(2)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes five rigs that were being retrofitted. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes one rig that has not been assembled. |
Oil
Field Services
Our oil field services business began in 1986 and conducts
operations that complement our drilling services operation.
These services include providing pulling units, coiled-tubing
units, trucking, location and road construction roustabout
services, mud logging and rental tools to ourselves and to
third-parties. Less than 13% of our oil field services revenues
are from third-parties. We also provide underbalanced drilling
systems for our own wells. Our expected capital expenditures for
2007 related to our oil field services are $115 million.
Types
of Drilling Contracts
We obtain our contracts for drilling natural gas and oil wells
either through competitive bidding or through direct
negotiations with customers. Our drilling contracts generally
provide for compensation on a daywork, footage or turnkey basis.
The contract terms we offer generally depend on the complexity
and risk of operations, the
on-site
drilling conditions, the type of equipment used, the anticipated
duration of the work to be performed and prevailing market
rates. For a discussion of these contracts, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Segment
Overview Drilling and Oil Field Services.
Our
Customers
We perform approximately two-thirds of our drilling services in
support of our exploration and production business. We also have
significant customer relationships with other operators in West
Texas, including Mariner Energy, Inc. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, we generated revenues of
$28.9 million, for drilling services performed for
third-parties, with Mariner Energy, Inc. accounting for
$18.1 million of those revenues.
In addition, we began receiving delivery of rigs to our Larclay
joint venture in the first quarter of 2006. Larclay began
drilling wells in the first quarter of 2006. CWEI will utilize
fewer Larclay rigs on its own projects than initially
anticipated.
76
Midstream
Gas Services
We provide gathering, compression, processing and treating
services of natural gas in the TransPecos region of West Texas
and the Piceance Basin. Our midstream operations and assets not
only serve our exploration and production business, but also
service other natural gas and oil companies. The following
tables set forth our primary midstream assets as of
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant Capacity
|
|
Average
|
|
Third Party
|
ROC Gas Operated Plants
|
|
(Mmcf/d)
|
|
Utilization(1)
|
|
Usage
|
|
Pikes Peak(2)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
|
less than 1.0%
|
|
Grey Ranch(3)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
89.0
|
%
|
|
|
33.4%
|
|
Sagebrush(4)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
|
|
17.8%
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average utilization for nine months ended September 30,
2007. |
|
(2) |
|
A project to expand Pikes Peak capacity to 70 Mmcf
per day is planned for completion by the fourth quarter of 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
The Grey Ranch plant is operated by Southern Union. A project to
expand the plant to 90 Mmcf/d will be completed during the
fourth quarter of 2007. We expect the plant capacity will be
further increased to 170 Mmcf/d by July of 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Sagebrush commenced processing operations on May 1, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CO2
Compression
|
|
Average
|
PetroSource Facilities
|
|
Capacity (Mmcf/d)
|
|
Utilization(1)
|
|
Pikes Peak
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
Mitchell
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Grey Ranch
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
67.5
|
%
|
Terrell
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average utilization for nine months ended September 30,
2007. |
West
Texas
In Pecos County, we operate and own 92.5% of the Pikes
Peak gas treating plant, which has the capacity to treat
58 Mmcf per day of gas for the removal of
CO2
from natural gas produced in the Piñon Field and nearby
areas. We intend to expand Pikes Peaks capacity to
70 Mmcf per day during the fourth quarter of 2007. We also
have a 50% interest in the partnership that leases and operates
the Grey Ranch
CO2
treatment plant located in Pecos County, which has the capacity
to treat 82 Mmcf per day of gas. A project to increase the
plant capacity to 90 Mmcf per day will be completed during
the fourth quarter of 2007. Further expansion to 170 Mmcf
per day may be accomplished with additional capital
expenditures. The treating capacities for both the Pikes
Peak and Grey Ranch plants are dependent upon the quality of
natural gas being treated. The above numbers for the Pikes
Peak and Grey Ranch plants are based on a natural gas stream
that is about 65%
CO2.
We also operate or own approximately 300 miles of natural
gas gathering pipelines and numerous dehydration units. Within
the Piñon Field, we operate separate gathering systems for
sweet natural gas and produced natural gas containing high
percentages of
CO2.
In addition to servicing our exploration and production
business, these assets also service other natural gas and oil
companies.
A portion of our West Texas assets, including the Pikes
Peak plant and approximately 44 miles of pipeline, was
acquired from TXU Lone Star in 1999. We have since constructed
or acquired approximately 250 miles of pipeline. In 2003,
we entered into a 50% joint venture with Southern Union Gas
Services, whose primary assets are a lease on the Grey Ranch
natural gas treatment plant and a
22-mile
pipeline gathering system. The term of the lease expires in
mid-2010, however we plan to purchase the Grey Ranch plant
during the fourth quarter of 2007. Our two West Texas plants
remove
CO2
from natural gas production and deliver
77
residue gas into the Atmos Lone Star and Enterprise Energy
Services pipelines. These assets are operated on fixed fees
based upon throughput of natural gas. We have also secured
50 Mmcf/d of treating capacity at Anadarkos Mitchell
Plant under a long term favorable fixed fee arrangement.
Approximately 90% of the produced natural gas gathered by our
midstream assets in West Texas requires compression from the
wellhead to the final sales meter. We began replacing
third-party rental compression through ROC Gas in 2003. ROC Gas
currently owns and operates approximately 27,000 horsepower of
gas compression and that number will grow to approximately
53,000 horsepower by the end of 2007.
Other
Areas
Our Piceance Basin system consists of 50 Mmcf per day of
processing plants and approximately 53 miles of pipeline
gathering systems. We gather and transport our natural gas and
third-party natural gas to market delivery points on Colorado
Interstate Gas Company, Questar and Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
Pipelines.
We also own approximately 65 miles of pipeline gathering
systems in East Texas and approximately 44 miles of
pipeline gathering systems in the Gulf Coast area.
Capital
Expenditures
The growth of our midstream assets is driven by our exploration
and development operations. Historically, pipeline and facility
expansions are made when warranted by the increase in production
or the development of additional acreage. As a result of our
increased production from the Piñon Field during 2007, we
have experienced some compressor capacity limitations and
relatively poor runtime during the first half of 2007. The
current system does not have surplus horsepower to compensate
for periods of scheduled maintenance. When units are serviced or
go down unexpectedly, we lose throughput and experience higher
line pressures, which impact the deliverability. Additionally,
some of our compressor units in the Piñon Field have been
operating at high loads, which may result in excessive wear and
downtime. In order to ensure sufficient capacity for our
existing and future Piñon Field production, we plan to
install approximately 26,000 horsepower of additional
compression by the end of 2007. These new units will provide
surplus capacity and allow us to provide stable, low pressures
to maximize the deliverability of our wells. We also intend to
install over 40 miles of large diameter pipeline and
implement treating expansions in the Piñon Field, which we
expect to be operational by the fourth quarter of 2007.
Additionally, with our anticipated increase of high
CO2
gas production in the WTO over the next several years, we intend
to build supplemental treating capacity, pipeline gathering
infrastructure and compression facilities to accommodate our
aggressive growth plans.
Marketing
Through Integra Energy, our subsidiary, we buy and sell the
natural gas and oil production from SandRidge-operated wells and
third-party operated wells within our West Texas operations.
Through Integra Energy, we will purchase and sell residue gas
from the Sagebrush plant into Questar and Colorado Interstate
Gas pipelines. We generally buy and sell natural gas on
back-to-back
contracts using a portfolio of baseload and spot sales
agreements. Identical volumes are bought and sold on monthly and
daily contracts using a combination of Inside F.E.R.C. and Gas
Daily pricing indices to eliminate price exposure. We market our
oil and condensate production in both Texas and Colorado to
Shell Trading U.S. Company at current market rates.
We do not actively seek to buy and sell third-party natural gas
due to onerous credit requirements and minimal margin
expectations. We conduct thorough credit checks with all
potential purchasers and minimize our exposure by contracting
with multiple parties each month. We do not engage in any
hedging activities with respect to these contracts. We manage
several interruptible natural gas transportation agreements in
order to take advantage of price differentials or to secure
available markets when necessary. At present, we do not have any
firm transportation agreements, but we are in the process of
securing firm transportation for a portion of our Piñon
Field production.
78
Other
Operations
Our
CO2
gathering, merchant sales and tertiary oil recovery operations
are conducted through our wholly-owned subsidiary, PetroSource.
PetroSource owns 231 miles of
CO2
pipelines in West Texas with approximately 92,000 horsepower of
owned and leased
CO2
compression available with approximately 54,000 horsepower
currently operational. In addition, PetroSource has exclusive
long-term supply contracts to gather
CO2
from natural gas treatment plants in West Texas and is the sole
gatherer of
CO2
from the four natural gas treatment plants located in the
Delaware and Val Verde Basins of West Texas. The primary use of
our
CO2
supply is for use in our and third-parties tertiary oil
recovery operations. We have assembled an experienced
CO2
management team, including engineers and geologists with
extensive experience in
CO2
flooding with industry leaders.
Production from most oil reservoirs includes three distinct
phases: primary, secondary, and tertiary, or enhanced recovery.
During primary recovery, the natural pressure of the reservoir
or gravity drives oil into the wellbore and artificial lift
techniques (such as pumps) produce the oil to the surface.
However, only about 10% to 15% of a reservoirs original
oil in place is typically produced during primary recovery.
Secondary recovery techniques, most commonly waterflooding,
often increase ultimate recovery to more than 20% to 45% of the
original oil in place. This technique involves injecting water
to displace oil and drive it to the wellbore. Even after a water
flood, the majority of the original oil in place is still
un-recovered. Tertiary, or enhanced recovery techniques, such as
CO2
flooding, can recover additional oil. In
CO2
flooding, the
CO2
is injected into the reservoir. At high pressures (approximately
2,000 psi), the
CO2
is in a liquid phase and can become miscible with the oil, which
means the
CO2
and oil mix together and form one fluid. This mixing changes the
fluid properties of the oil and enables this trapped oil to
begin to move in the reservoir again. The result is a
potentially significant increase in production.
CO2
injection can recover, on average, an additional 10% to 16% of
the original oil in place in a field over a period of 20 to
30 years. Mature fields that have been abandoned may still
be viable candidates for
CO2
floods.
CO2
flooding typically extends the life of oil fields by
20 years.
In 2004 and 2005, we acquired West Texas waterfloods, the
Wellman and South Mallet Units and the George Allen Unit for the
purpose of evaluating for potential implementation of tertiary
oil recovery operations utilizing our equity
CO2
supply. For a discussion of our tertiary reserves and production
at the units, please read Exploration and
Production Operations Tertiary Oil Recovery.
We have also identified numerous other properties that are
attractive candidates for implementing
CO2
projects. We believe we have a competitive advantage in
identifying, acquiring and developing these properties because
of our expertise and large available
CO2
supply.
PetroSource currently has approximately 95 Mmcf per day of
CO2
in available supply. We currently deliver the majority of this
supply to Occidental Permian Ltd. and Chevron Corporation. In
September 2007, we captured and sold 79.5 Mmcf per day. Our
long term contracts in place with Occidental provide for the
exchange of up to 60% of the delivered volumes. We believe our
current tertiary oil recovery properties will require
approximately 60 Mmcf of
CO2
per day over the next five years. We intend to increase our
supply of
CO2
in order to provide sufficient capacity as our tertiary oil
recovery operations grow through additional acquisitions and
expansions. We expect the supply of
CO2
to increase as additional natural gas reserves with a high
CO2
content are developed in the Piñon and surrounding fields.
In addition, we intend to increase the capacity of our
CO2
treating, gathering and transportation assets which will
continue to provide for our equity
CO2
needs, as well as the expansion of our merchant sales business.
We recently completed the refurbishment of an additional
compressor unit at the Grey Ranch plant at a cost of
approximately $1.2 million. The unit added 6,350
operational horsepower and 16 Mmcf per day of capacity to
our system.
In addition to gathering
CO2
for use in tertiary oil recovery operations, our
CO2
assets may create another economic benefit by generating
Emissions Reduction Credits (ERCs). Recently, a
number of states of the U.S. have passed laws, adopted
regulations or undertaken regulatory initiatives to reduce the
emission of greenhouse gases, such as
CO2
and methane. In addition, the U.S. Congress is actively
considering legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases,
and in light of the U.S. Supreme Courts recent
decision in Massachusetts, et al. v. EPA, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency may be required to
regulate
79
greenhouse gas emissions from mobile sources (e.g., cars
and trucks) even if Congress does not adopt new legislation
specifically addressing emissions of greenhouse gases. Other
nations (not including the United States) have already agreed to
regulate emissions of greenhouse gases pursuant to the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, also known as
the Kyoto Protocol. We believe that we are well
positioned to benefit from the developing market for trading
ERCs. We currently capture approximately 1.5 million tons
of
CO2
per year. Since that
CO2
would otherwise escape into the atmosphere, the resulting
capture of
CO2
generates ERCs that can be sold to parties either needing or
desiring to offset their own
CO2
emissions. In the past, we have sold a portion of our ERCs;
however, this market is still in its infancy and has not been a
material source of income. In the coming years, we expect ERCs
to become a greater source of income.
Competition
We believe that our leasehold acreage position, oil field
service businesses, midstream assets,
CO2
supply and technical and operational capabilities generally
enable us to compete effectively. However, the natural gas and
oil industry is intensely competitive, and we face competition
in each of our business segments.
We believe our geographic concentration of operations and
vertical integration enable us to compete effectively with our
exploration and production operations. However, we compete with
companies that have greater financial and personnel resources
than we do. These companies may be able to pay more for
producing properties and undeveloped acreage. In addition, these
companies may have a greater ability to continue exploration
activities during periods of low natural gas and oil market
prices. Our larger or integrated competitors may be able to
absorb the burden of any existing and future federal, state, and
local laws and regulations more easily than we can, which would
adversely affect our competitive position. Our ability to
acquire additional properties and to discover reserves in the
future will be dependent upon our ability to evaluate and select
suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly
competitive environment. In addition, because we have fewer
financial and human resources than many companies in our
industry, we may be at a disadvantage in bidding for exploratory
prospects and producing natural gas and oil properties.
We believe the type, age and condition of our drilling rigs, the
quality of our crew and the responsiveness of our management
generally enable us to compete effectively. However, to the
extent we drill for third-parties, we encounter substantial
competition from other drilling contractors. Our primary market
area is highly competitive. The drilling contracts we compete
for are sometimes awarded on the basis of competitive bids. We
believe pricing and rig availability are the primary factors our
potential customers consider in determining which drilling
contractor to select. While we must be competitive in our
pricing, our competitive strategy generally emphasizes the
quality of our equipment, the experience of our rig crews and
our willingness to drill on a turnkey basis, to differentiate us
from our competitors. This strategy is less effective when
demand for drilling services is weak or there is an oversupply
of rigs, as these conditions usually result in increased price
competition, which makes it more difficult for us to compete on
the basis of factors other than price. Many of our competitors
have greater financial, technical and other resources than we
do. Their greater capabilities in these areas may enable them to
better withstand industry downturns and better retain skilled
rig personnel.
We believe our geographic concentration of operations enables us
to compete effectively in our midstream business segment. Most
of our midstream assets are integrated with our production.
However, with respect to third-party gas and acquisitions, we
compete with companies that have greater financial and personnel
resources than we do. These companies may be able to pay more
for acquisitions. In addition, these companies may have a
greater ability to price their services below our prices for
similar services. Our larger or integrated competitors may be
able to absorb the burden of any existing and future federal,
state, and local laws and regulations more easily than we can,
which would adversely affect our competitive position.
We believe our supply of
CO2,
focus on small to mid-sized acquisitions and technical expertise
enable us to compete effectively in our PetroSource business.
However, we face the same competitive pressures in this business
that we do in our traditional exploration and production segment.
80
Seasonal
Nature of Business
Generally, the demand for natural gas decreases during the
summer months and increases during the winter months. Seasonal
anomalies such as mild winters or cool summers sometimes lessen
this fluctuation. In addition, certain natural gas users utilize
natural gas storage facilities and purchase some of their
anticipated winter requirements during the summer. This can also
lessen seasonal demand fluctuations. Seasonal weather conditions
and lease stipulations can limit our drilling and producing
activities and other natural gas and oil operations in a portion
of our operating areas. These seasonal anomalies can pose
challenges for meeting our well drilling objectives and can
increase competition for equipment, supplies and personnel
during the spring and summer months, which could lead to
shortages and increase costs or delay our operations.
Environmental
Matters and Regulation
General
We are subject to various stringent and complex federal, state
and local laws and regulations governing environmental
protection including the discharge of materials into the
environment. These laws and regulations may, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
require the acquisition of various permits before drilling
commences;
|
|
|
|
require the installation of expensive pollution control
equipment;
|
|
|
|
restrict the types, quantities and concentration of various
substances that can be released into the environment in
connection with natural gas and oil drilling production,
transportation and processing activities;
|
|
|
|
suspend, limit, prohibit or require approval before
construction, drilling and other activities in certain lands
lying within wilderness, wetlands and other protected
areas; and
|
|
|
|
require remedial measures to mitigate pollution from historical
and ongoing operations, such as the closure of pits and plugging
of abandoned wells.
|
These laws, rules and regulations may also restrict the rate of
natural gas and oil production below the rate that would
otherwise be possible. The regulatory burden on the natural gas
and oil industry increases the cost of doing business in the
industry and consequently affects profitability.
Governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance
with environmental laws, regulations and permits, and violations
are subject to injunction, as well as administrative, civil and
even criminal penalties. The effects of these laws and
regulations, as well as other laws or regulations that may be
adopted in the future, could have a material adverse impact on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Below is a discussion of the environmental laws and regulations
that could have a material impact on the oil and gas industry.
Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act, or CERCLA, also known as the Superfund law,
imposes joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
legality of conduct, on classes of persons who are considered to
be responsible for the release of a hazardous substance into the
environment. These persons include the owner or operator of the
site where the release occurred, and anyone who disposed or
arranged for the disposal of a hazardous substance released at
the site. Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject to joint and
several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous
substances that have been released into the environment, for
damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health
studies. In addition, it is not uncommon for neighboring
landowners and other third-parties to file claims for personal
injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous
substances released into the environment. In the course of our
operations, we generate wastes that may fall within
CERCLAs definition of hazardous substances. Further,
natural gas and oil exploration, production, processing and
other activities have been conducted at some of our properties
by previous owners and operators, and materials from these
81
operations remain on some of our properties and in some cases
may require remediation. Therefore, governmental agencies or
third-parties could seek to hold us responsible under CERCLA or
similar state laws for all or part of the costs to clean up a
site at which hazardous substances may have been released or
deposited.
Waste
Handling
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, and
comparable state statutes, regulate the generation,
transportation, treatment, storage, disposal and cleanup of
hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. Under the auspices of the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, the
individual states administer some or all of the provisions of
RCRA, sometimes in conjunction with their own more stringent
requirements. Drilling fluids, produced waters, and most of the
other wastes associated with the exploration, development, and
production of crude oil or natural gas are currently regulated
under RCRAs non-hazardous waste provisions. However, it is
possible that certain natural gas and oil exploration and
production wastes now classified as non-hazardous could be
classified as hazardous wastes in the future. Any such change
would likely increase our operating expenses, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
Air
Emissions
The Federal Clean Air Act, and comparable state laws regulate
emissions of various air pollutants through air emissions
permitting programs and the imposition of other requirements. In
addition, the EPA has developed, and continues to develop,
stringent regulations governing emissions of toxic air
pollutants at specified sources. These regulatory programs may
require us to obtain permits before commencing construction on a
new source of air emissions, and may require us to reduce
emissions at existing facilities. As a result, we may be
required to incur increased capital and operating costs. For
instance, the Grey Ranch natural gas treatment plant currently
operates under a grandfather clause, which expires, possibly in
as early as September 2008. Southern Union, the operator of
the Grey Ranch plant, has been in discussions with the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality concerning an extension of
the grandfather clause protection until January 2011. We
expect that the State of Texas will require us to obtain an air
emissions permit for the plant prior to the expiration of the
grandfather clause. The new air permit may impose new, lower air
emissions limits for nitrogen oxides and possibly other
contaminants, and we may be required to incur capital costs to
upgrade the plants air emissions control equipment in
order to achieve these new, lower air emissions limits. Based on
information currently available to us, we estimate that the cost
to upgrade the plant if new, lower air emissions limits are
imposed by the new air permit could be approximately
$7 million, of which we would be responsible for
approximately $3.5 million and Southern Union would be
responsible for approximately $3.5 million. Additionally,
federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative,
civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance with air permits
or other requirements of the federal Clean Air Act and analogous
state laws and regulations.
Water
Discharges
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, or the Clean Water Act,
and analogous state laws, impose restrictions and strict
controls with respect to the discharge of pollutants, including
spills and leaks of oil and other substances into waters of the
United States, including wetlands. These laws prohibit the
discharge of produced waters and sand, drilling fluids, drill
cuttings and other substances related to the oil and natural gas
industry into onshore, coastal and offshore waters without
appropriate permits. Some of the pollutant limitations have
become more restrictive over the years and additional
restrictions and limitations may be imposed in the future. The
Clean Water Act also regulates storm water discharges from
industrial and construction activities. Regulations promulgated
by the EPA and state regulatory agencies require industries
engaged in certain industrial or construction activities to
acquire permits and implement storm water management plans and
best management practices, to conduct periodic monitoring and
reporting of discharges, and to train employees. Further,
federal and state regulations require certain oil and natural
gas exploration and production facilities to obtain permits for
storm water discharges. There are costs associated with each of
82
these regulatory requirements. In addition, federal and state
regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil and
criminal penalties for non-compliance with discharge permits or
other requirements of the Clean Water Act and analogous state
laws and regulations.
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, which amends and augments
the Clean Water Act, establishes strict liability for owners and
operators of facilities that are the site of a release of oil
into waters of the United States. In addition, OPA and
regulations promulgated pursuant thereto impose a variety of
regulations on responsible parties related to the prevention of
oil spills and liability for damages resulting from such spills.
For example, certain natural gas and oil operators must develop,
implement and maintain facility response plans, conduct annual
spill training for certain employees and provide varying degrees
of financial assurance.
National
Environmental Policy Act
Natural gas and oil exploration and production activities on
federal lands are subject to the National Environmental Policy
Act, or NEPA. NEPA requires federal agencies, including the
Department of Interior, to evaluate major agency actions having
the potential to significantly impact the environment. In the
course of such evaluations, an agency will prepare an
Environmental Assessment that assesses the potential direct,
indirect and cumulative impacts of a proposed project and, if
necessary, will prepare a more detailed Environmental Impact
Statement that may be made available for public review and
comment. All of our current exploration and production
activities, as well as proposed exploration and development
plans on federal lands require governmental permits that are
subject to the requirements of NEPA. This process has the
potential to delay or limit our development of natural gas and
oil projects.
Other
Laws and Regulations
Recent scientific studies have suggested that emissions of
certain gases, commonly referred to as greenhouse
gases and including carbon dioxide and methane, may be
contributing to warming of the Earths atmosphere. In
response to such studies, the U.S. Congress is actively
considering legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.
In addition, several states have declined to wait on Congress to
develop and implement climate control legislation and have
already taken legal measures to reduce emissions of greenhouse
gases. Also, as a result of the U.S. Supreme Courts
decision on April 2, 2007 in Massachusetts, et al. v.
EPA, the EPA may be required to regulate greenhouse gas
emissions from mobile sources (e.g., cars and trucks)
even if Congress does not adopt new legislation specifically
addressing emissions of greenhouse gases. Other nations have
already agreed to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases
pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, an international treaty pursuant
to which participating countries (not including the United
States) have agreed to reduce their emissions of greenhouse
gases to below 1990 levels by 2012. Passage of climate control
legislation or other regulatory initiatives by Congress or
various states of the U.S., or the adoption of regulations by
the EPA and analogous state agencies that restrict emissions of
greenhouse gases in areas in which we conduct business could
have an adverse affect on some of our operations and demand for
some of our services or products.
New and more stringent laws and regulations concerning the
security of industrial facilities, including natural gas and oil
facilities could be adopted in the future. Our operations may in
the future be subject to such laws and regulations. Presently,
it is not possible to accurately estimate the costs we could
incur to comply with any such facility security laws or
regulations, but such expenditures could be substantial.
Other
Regulation of the Natural Gas and Oil Industry
The natural gas and oil industry is extensively regulated by
numerous federal, state and local authorities, including Native
American tribes. Legislation affecting the natural gas and oil
industry is under constant review for amendment or expansion,
frequently increasing the regulatory burden. Also, numerous
departments and agencies, both federal and state, and Native
American tribes are authorized by statute to issue rules and
regulations binding on the natural gas and oil industry and its
individual members, some of which carry substantial penalties
for failure to comply. Although the regulatory burden on the
natural gas and oil industry increases our cost of doing
business and, consequently, affects our profitability, these
burdens generally do not affect us any differently or to any
greater or lesser extent than they affect other companies in the
industry with similar types, quantities and locations of
production.
83
Drilling
and Production
Our operations are subject to various types of regulation at
federal, state, local and Native American tribal levels. These
types of regulation include requiring permits for the drilling
of wells, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. Most
states, and some counties, municipalities and Native American
tribes, in which we operate also regulate one or more of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the location of wells;
|
|
|
|
the method of drilling and casing wells;
|
|
|
|
the rates of production or allowables;
|
|
|
|
the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells
are drilled and other third-parties;
|
|
|
|
the plugging and abandoning of wells; and
|
|
|
|
notice to surface owners and other third-parties.
|
State laws regulate the size and shape of drilling and spacing
units or proration units governing the pooling of natural gas
and oil properties. Some states allow forced pooling or
integration of tracts to facilitate exploration while other
states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and leases. In some
instances, forced pooling or unitization may be implemented by
third-parties and may reduce our interest in the unitized
properties. In addition, state conservation laws establish
maximum rates of production from natural gas and oil wells,
generally prohibit the venting or flaring of natural gas and
impose requirements regarding the ratability of production.
These laws and regulations may limit the amount of natural gas
and oil we can produce from our wells or limit the number of
wells or the locations at which we can drill. Moreover, each
state generally imposes a production or severance tax with
respect to the production and sale of oil, natural gas and
natural gas liquids within its jurisdiction.
Federal, state and local regulations provide detailed
requirements for the abandonment of wells, closure or
decommissioning of production facilities and pipelines, and for
site restoration, in areas where we operate. MMS regulations
require that owners and operators plug and abandon wells and
decommission and remove offshore facilities located in federal
offshore lease areas in a prescribed manner. The MMS requires
federal leaseholders to post performance bonds or otherwise
provide necessary financial assurances to provide for such
abandonment, decommissioning and removal. The Railroad
Commission of Texas has financial responsibility requirements
for owners and operators of facilities in state waters to
provide for similar assurances. The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, or ACOE, and many other state and local
municipalities have regulations for plugging and abandonment,
decommissioning and site restoration. Although the ACOE does not
require bonds or other financial assurances, some other state
agencies and municipalities do have such requirements.
Natural
Gas Sales Transportation
Historically, federal legislation and regulatory controls have
affected the price of the natural gas we produce and the manner
in which we market our production. The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, or FERC, has jurisdiction over the transportation
and sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce by
natural gas companies under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 and the
Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978. Since 1978, various federal laws
have been enacted which have resulted in the complete removal of
all price and non-price controls for sales of domestic natural
gas sold in first sales, which include all of our
sales of our own production.
FERC also regulates interstate natural gas transportation rates
and service conditions, which affects the marketing of natural
gas that we produce, as well as the revenues we receive for
sales of our natural gas. Commencing in 1985, FERC promulgated a
series of orders, regulations and rule makings that
significantly fostered competition in the business of
transporting and marketing gas. Today, interstate pipeline
companies are required to provide nondiscriminatory
transportation services to producers, marketers and other
shippers, regardless of whether such shippers are affiliated
with an interstate pipeline company. FERCs initiatives
have led to the development of a competitive, unregulated, open
access market for gas purchases and sales that permits all
purchasers of gas to buy gas directly from third-party sellers
other than pipelines. However, the
84
natural gas industry historically has been very heavily
regulated; therefore, we cannot guarantee that the less
stringent regulatory approach recently pursued by FERC and
Congress will continue indefinitely into the future nor can we
determine what affect, if any, future regulatory changes might
have on our natural gas related activities.
Under FERCs current regulatory regime, transmission
services must be provided on an open-access, non-discriminatory
basis at cost-based rates or at market-based rates if the
transportation market at issue is sufficiently competitive.
Gathering service, which occurs upstream of jurisdictional
transmission services, is regulated by the states onshore and
instate waters. Although its policy is still in flux, FERC
recently has reclassified certain jurisdictional transmission
facilities as non-jurisdictional gathering facilities, which has
the tendency to increase our costs of getting gas to
point-of-sale
locations.
Employees
As of September 30, 2007, we had approximately
2,200 full-time employees and eight part-time employees,
including more than 100 geologists, geophysicists,
petroleum engineers, technicians, land and regulatory
professionals. Of our approximately 2,220 employees, 292 are
located at our headquarters in Oklahoma City, nine in Amarillo,
Texas and the remaining 1,907 employees are working in our
various field offices and drilling sites.
Offices
We currently lease 67,347 square feet of office space in
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma at 1601 N.W. Expressway, where our
principal offices are located, and another 28,059 square
feet in Enterprise Plaza, which is nearby. The term of the
leases expires for our space at 1601 N.W. Expressway on
August 31, 2009. For our space at Enterprise Plaza, the
term of lease expires on October 31, 2009 for
18,547 square feet, and April 31, 2008 for
9,433 square feet. We also lease or sublease
37,873 square feet of office space in Amarillo, Texas at
701 S. Taylor Street, where our principal offices were
previously located. The leases for our Amarillo office expire in
April 2009. We also lease 6,725 square feet of office space
at 16801 Greenspoint Park Drive in Houston, Texas. This lease
expires in January 2014. PetroSource currently leases
approximately 3,529 square feet in Midland, Texas. The
PetroSource lease expires in December 2008. We also own an
approximate 10,000 square foot office building in Midland,
Texas. We also own 4,358 square feet of office space and
6,240 square feet of shop space in Odessa, Texas, which
serves as the headquarters of Lariat Services. In addition, we
have a field office located in Terry County, Texas and Rifle,
Colorado. We believe that our office facilities are adequate for
our short-term needs.
On July 12, 2007, we purchased several buildings in
downtown Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, including the Kerr-McGee
Tower, from Chesapeake for approximately $25 million. These
properties are located at 123 Robert S. Kerr Avenue and
contain approximately 450,000 square feet of office space.
We intend to relocate our principal offices from 1601 N.W.
Expressway to the Kerr-McGee Tower.
Legal
Proceedings
On May 18, 2004, we commenced a civil action seeking
declaratory judgment against Elliot Roosevelt, Jr., E.R.
Family Limited Partnership and Ceres Resource Partners, L.P. in
the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, 101st Judicial
District, SandRidge Energy, Inc. and Riata Energy Piceance,
LLC v. Elliot Roosevelt, Jr. et al, Cause
No. 92.717-C.
This suit sought a declaratory judgment relating to the rights
of the parties in and to certain leases in a defined area of
mutual interest in the Piceance Basin pursuant to an acquisition
agreement entered into in 1989, including our 41,454 gross
(16,193 net) acreage position. We tried the case to a jury
in July 2006. Before the case was submitted to the jury, the
trial court granted Roosevelt a directed verdict stating that he
owned a 25% deferred interest in our acreage after project
payout. The directed verdict is not likely to affect our proved
reserves of 11.7 Bcfe, because of the requirement that
project payout be
85
achieved before the deferred interest shares in revenue. Other
issues of fact were submitted to the jury. The trial court
recently entered a judgment favorable to Roosevelt. We have
filed a motion to modify the judgment and for a new trial.
Depending on the outcome of this motion, we expect to appeal, at
a minimum, from the entry of the directed verdict. If we do not
ultimately prevail, the deferred interest will reduce our
economic returns from the project, if project payout is achieved.
We are subject to other claims in the ordinary course of
business. However, we believe that the ultimate resolution of
the above mentioned claims and other current legal proceedings
will not have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition or results of operations.
86
The following table sets forth information regarding our
executive officers, our directors and other key employees as of
September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Tom L. Ward
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|
Dirk M. Van Doren
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Matthew K. Grubb
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Larry K. Coshow
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Executive Vice President Land
|
Todd N. Tipton
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Executive Vice President Exploration
|
Rodney E. Johnson
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Reservoir Engineering
|
V. Bruce Thompson
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Legal and General Counsel
|
Thomas L. Winton
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Information Technology and
Chief
Information Officer
|
Mary L. Whitson
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Human Resources
|
Randall D. Cooley
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Vice President Accounting
|
Bill Gilliland
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Director
|
Dan Jordan
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director
|
Roy T. Oliver, Jr.
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Director
|
Stuart W. Ray
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director
|
D. Dwight Scott
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Director
|
Jeffrey Serota
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Director
|
Tom L. Ward (Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President)
Mr. Ward has served as our Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer since June 2006 and as our President since December
2006. Prior to joining SandRidge, he served as President, Chief
Operating Officer and a director of Chesapeake Energy
Corporation (NYSE: CHK) from the time he co-founded the company
in 1989 until February 2006. From February 2006 until June 2006,
Mr. Ward managed his private investments. Chesapeake Energy
Corporation is the second largest independent natural gas
producer in the U.S. Mr. Ward graduated from the
University of Oklahoma in 1981 with a Bachelor of Business
Administration in Petroleum Land Management. He is a member of
the Board of Trustees of Anderson University in Anderson,
Indiana.
Dirk M. Van Doren (Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer) Mr. Van Doren has served as our
Chief Financial Officer since June 2006. He served in High Yield
Research at Goldman Sachs from 1999 until May 2006 and prior to
that he was in Equity Research at Bear Stearns. Mr. Van
Doren graduated from Colgate University in 1981 with a Bachelor
of Arts in Political Science and International Relations and
earned a Masters degree in Business Administration from Duke
University, The Fuqua School of Business in 1985.
Matthew K. Grubb (Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer) Mr. Grubb has served as our
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since June
2007. Prior to this, he had served as our Executive Vice
President Operations since August 2006.
Mr. Grubb was employed by Samson Resources beginning in
1995 and served as Division Operations Manager of East
Texas and Southeast U.S. Regions for Samson Resources from
2002 through July 2006. Prior to that he was in Business
Development at Enogex Inc. and held various technical positions
at ConocoPhillips. Mr. Grubb holds a Bachelor of Science
degree in Petroleum Engineering in 1986 and a Master of Science
degree in Mechanical Engineering in 1988, both from Texas
A&M University.
Larry K. Coshow (Executive Vice President Land)
Mr. Coshow has served as our Executive Vice
President Land since September 2006. He previously
worked in various land management capacities for Chesapeake
Energy Corporation from 1999 through August 2006.
Mr. Coshow also worked in various land management
capacities at JMA Energy Company, Samson Resources and Texas
Oil & Gas Corp. Mr. Coshow received a Bachelor of
Business Administration in Petroleum Land Management from the
University of Oklahoma in 1981 and earned his Masters degree in
Business Administration from Oklahoma City Universitys
Meinders School of Business in 1993. A founding board member for
the University of Oklahoma Football
87
Lettermens Association, Mr. Coshow serves on the
board of directors for the University of Oklahomas Varsity
O Club and is also an active member of the Oklahoma
state board for the Fellowship of Christian Athletes.
Todd N. Tipton (Executive Vice President
Exploration) Mr. Tipton joined us as Executive Vice
President of Exploration in September 2006. Prior to this, he
was Exploration Manager of the Western Division from 2001
through August 2006 for Devon Energy. His career began with
Conoco in geophysical acquisition, processing and interpretation
and he continued to hold corporate and management positions of
increasing responsibilities until he left in 1994 to join
Alberta Energy Company (EnCana). After EnCana, Mr. Tipton
worked for Samson Resources and in private consulting. He
received a Bachelor degree in Geology from The State University
of New York at Buffalo in 1977, and completed an executive
development program at The Johnson Graduate School of Management
at Cornell University. Mr. Tipton is a member of the Rocky
Mountain Association of Geologists and a member of the
Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States.
Rodney E. Johnson (Senior Vice President
Reservoir Engineering) Mr. Johnson joined us as Vice
President of Reservoir Engineering in January 2007 and was
promoted to Senior Vice President Reservoir
Engineering in June 2007. He most recently served as Manager of
Reservoir Engineering over Texas and Louisiana Regions for
Chesapeake Energy Corporation from October 2003 through December
2006. Prior to this, Mr. Johnson served as Manager of
Technology for Aera Energy (a joint venture of Exxon/Shell)
where he held positions of increasing importance from 1996
through September 2003. Mr. Johnson graduated from Wichita
State University in 1980 with a Bachelor of Science degree in
Mechanical Engineering; he has also been a registered
Professional Engineer since 1988.
V. Bruce Thompson (Senior Vice President
Legal and General Counsel) Mr. Thompson has served as
our General Counsel, Senior Vice President Legal and
Secretary since March 2007. From 2003 until joining us, he was
Senior Counsel with the law firm of Brownstein Hyatt Farber
Schreck, working in the firms Washington, D.C. and
Denver offices. From July 2002 until joining Brownstein Hyatt
Farber Schreck, Mr. Thompson was a self employed lobbyist
and consultant for oil and gas related companies, both
domestically and internationally. Mr. Thompson has also
served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Forest
Oil Corporation and Chief of Staff for then Congressman, now
U.S. Senator, James Inhofe. Mr. Thompson graduated
from the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business
with a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics in 1969 and
received his Juris Doctorate from the University of Tulsa
College of Law in 1974.
Thomas L. Winton (Senior Vice President
Information Technology & CIO) Mr. Winton has
served as our Senior Vice President Information
Technology and Chief Information Officer since May 2006. Prior
to joining us, Mr. Winton served as Senior Vice President
and Chief Information Officer for Chesapeake Energy Corporation
from July 1998 until retiring in July 2005. Mr. Winton
obtained a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics from
Oklahoma Christian University in 1969, a Masters degree in
Mathematics from Creighton University in 1973, and Masters
degree in Business Administration from the University of Houston
in 1980. Mr. Winton also completed the Tuck Executive
Program, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College in 1987.
Mary L. Whitson (Senior Vice President Human
Resources) Ms. Whitson has served as our Senior Vice
President Human Resources since September 2006.
Ms. Whitson was the Vice President Human
Resources for Chesapeake Energy Corporation through August 2006,
where she held human resources management positions of
increasing responsibility for more than eight years. Prior to
1998, she was the Human Resources Manager for FKW, Incorporated,
an architecture and government services contracting firm, where
she was employed for 16 years. She attended Oklahoma State
University and received a Bachelor of Science degree from the
University of Central Oklahoma in 1996. Certified as a Senior
Professional in Human Resources (SPHR), Ms. Whitson is a
graduate of Leadership Oklahoma City Class XXIV and
currently serves as a member of the board of directors for the
YWCA of Oklahoma City.
Randall D. Cooley (Vice President Accounting)
Mr. Cooley has served as our Vice President, Accounting
since November 2006, upon the closing of the NEG acquisition.
Prior to joining SandRidge, Mr. Cooley served as the senior
financial officer with National Energy Group, Inc. until the
time of the NEG
88
acquisition, most recently as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. From 1989 until 2001, Mr. Cooley was Vice
President, Controller and Chief Financial Officer for Shana
Petroleum Company. He began his career in 1978 with Pennzoil Oil
Company in Houston. From 1980 until 1984, he was employed in
public accounting and from 1984 until 1989, he was controller
for Rebel Drilling Company and Wildcat Well Service.
Mr. Cooley earned a Bachelor of Science in Business
Administration, with a major in Accounting, from the University
of Southern Mississippi in 1978 and is a Certified Public
Accountant.
Bill Gilliland (Director) Mr. Gilliland was
appointed as a director on January 7, 2006.
Mr. Gilliland has served as managing partner of several
personal and family investment partnerships, including Gillco
Energy, L.P. and Gillco Investments, L.P., since April 1999.
Prior to this, Mr. Gilliland was the founder, Chief
Executive Officer, President and Chairman of Cross-Continent
Auto Retailers, Inc. Mr. Gilliland holds a Bachelor of
Business Administration from North Texas State University.
Dan Jordan (Director) Mr. Jordan was appointed as a
director of SandRidge in December 2005. Mr. Jordan also has
served as a director of PetroSource since May 2004 and served as
a Vice President and director of Symbol Underbalanced Air
Services and Larco from August 2003 to September 2005. From
October 2005 through August 2006, Mr. Jordan served as our
Vice President, Business. Since September 2006, Mr. Jordan
has been involved in private investments. Prior to joining
SandRidge, Mr. Jordan founded Jordan Drilling Fluids, Inc.
and served as its Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer from March 1984 to July 2005. Mr. Jordan sold
Jordan Drilling Fluids, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary,
Anchor Drilling Fluids USA Inc., in August 2005. At that time,
Anchor Drilling Fluids USA Inc. was the largest privately held
domestic drilling fluids firm.
Roy T. Oliver, Jr. (Director) Mr. Oliver was
appointed as a director on July 13, 2006. Mr. Oliver
has served as President of R.T. Oliver Investments, Inc., a
diversified investment company with interests in energy, energy
services, media and real estate, since August, 2001. The company
presently owns the largest portfolio of class A office
properties in Oklahoma. He has served as President and Chairman
of the Board of Valliance Bank, N.A. since August 2004. He
founded U.S. Rig and Equipment, Inc. in 1980 and served as
its President until its assets were sold in August 2003.
Mr. Oliver is a graduate of The University of Oklahoma with
a Bachelor of Business Administration degree. He serves on The
University of Oklahoma Michael F. Price College of Business
Board of Advisors.
Stuart W. Ray (Director) Mr. Ray was appointed as a
director on December 14, 2007. Mr. Ray is a Partner of
Sonenshine Partners LLC, a New York City based investment
banking firm, and a Partner of Urban American Partners, LLC, a
New Jersey based real estate investment and management firm that
owns and operates portfolios of workforce housing units.
Mr. Ray is a Chartered Financial Analyst, a member of the
New York Society of Security Analysts, and a registered broker
with the NASD. He received his Bachelor of Arts from Harvard
College and Master in Business Administration from Harvard
Business School.
D. Dwight Scott (Director) Mr. Scott was
appointed as a director on March 20, 2007. He has been a
Managing Director of GSO Capital Partners, an investment advisor
specializing in the leveraged finance marketplace since
September 2005. Prior to joining GSO, Mr. Scott was
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for
El Paso Corporation from October 2002 until August 2005. He
is a member of the Board of Directors of MCV Investors, Inc.,
United Engines Holding Company LLC, KIPP, Inc. and the Board of
Trustees of the Council on Alcohol and Drugs Houston.
Mr. Scott earned a Bachelors degree from the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a Masters
of Business Administration from the University of Texas at
Austin.
Jeffrey Serota (Director) Mr. Serota was appointed
as a director of SandRidge Energy, Inc. on March 20, 2007.
He has served as a Senior Partner with Ares Management LLC, an
independent Los Angeles based investment firm, since September
1997. Prior to joining Ares, Mr. Serota worked at Bear
Stearns from March 1996 to September 1997, where he specialized
in providing investment banking services to financial sponsor
clients of the firm. He currently serves on the Board of
Directors of Marietta Holding Corporation, Douglas Dynamics,
LLC, AmeriQual Group LLC, WCA Waste Corporation and White
Energy, Inc. Mr. Serota graduated magna cum laude with a
Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from the University of
89
Pennsylvanias Wharton School of Business and received a
Masters of Business Administration degree from UCLAs
Anderson School of Management.
Board of
Directors
Our board of directors currently consists of seven directors,
Messrs. Ward, Gilliland, Jordan, Oliver, Ray, Scott and
Serota. We are subject to all of the provisions of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules. In addition,
because our common stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange, a majority of our directors will be required to meet
standards of independence by November 5, 2008. We believe
that Messrs. Oliver, Ray, Scott and Serota currently meet
these independence standards.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for a
classified board of directors consisting of three classes of
directors, each serving staggered three-year terms. As a result,
stockholders will elect a portion of our board of directors each
year. Class I directors terms will expire at the
annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2010, Class II
directors terms will expire at the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2008 and Class III
directors terms will expire at the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2009. The Class I directors are
Messrs. Gilliland, Scott and Serota, the Class II
directors are Messrs. Ward and Oliver, and the
Class III directors are Messrs. Jordan and Ray. At
each annual meeting of stockholders held after the initial
classification, the successors to directors whose terms will
then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election
until the third annual meeting following election. The division
of our board of directors into three classes with staggered
terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a
change in control. See Description of Capital
Stock Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of
Delaware Law, Our Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws Classified Board; Renewal of Directors.
In addition, our bylaws provide that the authorized number of
directors, which shall constitute the whole board of directors,
may be changed by resolution duly adopted by the board of
directors. Any additional directorships resulting from an
increase in the number of directors will be distributed among
the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class
will consist of one-third of the total number of directors.
Vacancies and newly created directorships may be filled by the
affirmative vote of a majority of our directors then in office,
even if less than a quorum.
Committees
of the Board
Audit Committee. We established an audit
committee during the second quarter of 2007 consisting of
Messrs. Scott, Oliver and Serota, each of whom has been
determined to be independent under the rules of the SEC and the
listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange by our board
of directors. Upon the appointment of Mr. Ray to our board of
directors in December 2007, Mr. Oliver resigned from our
audit committee, and Mr. Ray was appointed to our audit
committee. Mr. Ray has been determined to be independent under
the rules of the SEC and the listing requirements of the New
York Stock Exchange by our board of directors. Mr. Scott
serves as chairman of this committee and has been determined by
our board of directors to be an audit committee financial
expert as defined under the rules of the SEC. This
committee oversees, reviews, acts on and reports on various
auditing and accounting matters to our board of directors,
including: the selection of our independent accountants, the
scope of our annual audits, fees to be paid to the independent
accountants, the performance of our independent accountants and
our accounting practices. In addition, the audit committee
oversees our compliance programs relating to legal and
regulatory requirements.
Compensation Committee. We established a
compensation committee in the fourth quarter of 2007 consisting
of Messrs. Gilliland, Oliver and Scott. Messrs. Oliver
and Scott have been determined to be independent under the
listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange by our board
of directors. We expect that this committee will consist solely
of independent directors within one year of listing. Mr.
Gilliland serves as chairman of this committee. This committee
will establish salaries, incentives and other forms of
compensation for officers and other employees. Our compensation
committee will also administer our incentive compensation and
benefit plans. We have adopted a compensation committee charter
defining the committees primary duties in a manner
consistent with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, which
is available on our website.
90
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. We established a nominating and
corporate governance committee in the fourth quarter of 2007
consisting of Messrs. Jordan and Serota. In
December 2007, Mr. Ray was appointed to our nominating
and corporate governance committee. Each of Messrs. Ray and
Serota has been determined to be independent under the listing
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange by our board of
directors. We expect that this committee will consist solely of
independent directors within one year of listing.
Mr. Jordan serves as chairman of this committee. This
committee will identify, evaluate and recommend qualified
nominees to serve on our board of directors, develop and oversee
our internal corporate governance processes and maintain a
management succession plan. We have adopted a nominating and
corporate governance committee charter defining the
committees primary duties in a manner consistent with the
rules of the New York Stock Exchange, which is available on our
website.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our executive officers serve as a member of the board of
directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one
or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our
board of directors. We do not currently have a compensation
committee. During the last fiscal year, both Mr. Ward, our
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and
Mr. Mitchell, our former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President, participated in the deliberations of our board of
directors concerning executive officer compensation.
Director
Compensation
Directors who also serve as employees receive no compensation
for serving on our board of directors. Non-employee directors
receive a $50,000 retainer and $12,500 for each of the four
regular meetings of the board of directors attended by such
director. In addition, in 2006, each non-employee director
received an annual restricted stock grant in the amount of
$100,000 based on the fair market value of common stock at the
date of grant, which will vest in 25% increments on each of the
first four anniversaries following the date of grant.
From January 1, 2006 to July 10, 2006, each of our
non-employee directors received an annual retainer of $30,000
and $1,000 per board meeting attended in person. Directors
who also served as employees during this period received no
compensation for serving on our board of directors.
The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation
awarded to, earned by or paid to our directors during 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Bill Gilliland
|
|
$
|
78,000(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,385
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
92,385
|
|
Dan Jordan
|
|
$
|
50,000(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,259
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
62,259
|
|
Roy T. Oliver, Jr.
|
|
$
|
50,000(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,385
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
64,385
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of (i) $50,000 received as a retainer for one year
of service as a non-employee director, and (ii) $28,000 for
attending three meetings before July 10, 2006 and two
regular meetings following July 10, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists of (i) $25,000 received as a retainer for six
months of service as a non-employee director and
(ii) $25,000 received for attending two regular meetings
after July 10, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes the dollar amount of compensation expense we recognized
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 in accordance
with FAS 123R. Pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, the
amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures
related to service-based vesting conditions. These amounts
reflect our accounting expense for these awards, and do not
correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by our
directors. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts
are included in Note 18 to our audited financial statements
included in this prospectus. As of December 31, 2006, the
number of shares of stock held by each non-employee director
was: Mr. Gilliland 1,348,489;
Mr. Jordan 633,333 and
Mr. Oliver 400,000. |
91
Indemnification
We have entered into indemnification agreements with all of our
directors and executive officers. These indemnification
agreements are intended to permit indemnification to the fullest
extent now or hereafter permitted by the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware. It is possible that the applicable law
could change the degree to which indemnification is expressly
permitted.
The indemnification agreements cover expenses (including
attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement incurred as a result of the fact that such person, in
his or her capacity as a director or officer, is made or
threatened to be made a party to any suit or proceeding. The
indemnification agreements generally cover claims relating to
the fact that the indemnified party is or was an officer,
director, employee or agent of us or any of our affiliates, or
is or was serving at our request in such a position for another
entity. The indemnification agreements also obligate us to
promptly advance all reasonable expenses incurred in connection
with any claim. The indemnitee is, in turn, obligated to
reimburse us for all amounts so advanced if it is later
determined that the indemnitee is not entitled to
indemnification. The indemnification provided under the
indemnification agreements is not exclusive of any other
indemnity rights; however, double payment to the indemnitee is
prohibited.
We are not obligated to indemnify the indemnitee with respect to
claims brought by the indemnitee against:
|
|
|
|
|
claims regarding the indemnitees rights under the
indemnification agreement;
|
|
|
|
claims to enforce a right to indemnification under any statute
or law; and counter-claims against us in a proceeding brought by
us against the indemnitee; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
any other person, except for claims approved by our board of
directors.
|
We have also agreed to obtain and maintain director and officer
liability insurance for the benefit of each of the above
indemnitees. These policies include coverage for losses for
wrongful acts and omissions and to ensure our performance under
the indemnification agreements. Each of the indemnitees is named
as an insured under such policies and provided with the same
rights and benefits as are accorded to the most favorably
insured of our directors and officers.
Web
Access
We provide access through our website at
http://www.sandridgeenergy.com
to current information relating to governance, including a copy
of each board committee charter, our Code of Conduct, our
corporate governance guidelines and other matters impacting our
governance principles. You may also contact our chief financial
officer for paper copies of these documents free of charge.
92
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (1) provides an
overview of our compensation policies and programs;
(2) explains our compensation objectives, policies and
practices with respect to our executive officers; and
(3) identifies the elements of compensation for each of the
individuals identified in the following table, whom we refer to
in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis as our named
executive officers.
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Principal Position
|
|
Current Officers:
|
|
|
Tom L. Ward
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|
Dirk M. Van Doren
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Matthew K. Grubb
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Former Officers:
|
|
|
N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd
|
|
Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|
John Gaines
|
|
Former Chief Financial Officer
|
Barbara Pope
|
|
Former Vice President, Accounting
|
Todd Dutton
|
|
Former Chief Operating Officer and Vice President
Land
|
Matthew McCann
|
|
Former Senior Vice President Legal
|
Since our inception through June 2006, we were controlled by
Mr. Mitchell, our founder and former Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President. During this time,
Mr. Mitchell held ultimate decision making power with
respect to the compensation of our executive officers. In June
2006, Mr. Ward purchased a significant portion of
Mr. Mitchells common stock and was appointed as our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Wards
initial compensation level and employment agreement were
recommended by a special committee consisting of our independent
directors at that time and were approved by our full board of
directors. Following Mr. Wards appointment, we have
experienced significant changes in management, including
replacement of substantially all of our executive officers, as
well as our compensation objectives, policies and practices as
described in more detail below.
Setting
Executive Compensation
Role of our Board and Executive Officers. Our
board of directors does not currently have a separate
compensation committee due to the size of our existing board of
directors and the lack of independent directors. Prior to June
2006, Mr. Mitchell held ultimate decision making control
with respect to the compensation levels of our named executive
officers, including himself. In determining compensation levels,
Mr. Mitchell relied primarily on his personal experience as
chief executive officer and founder of the company.
Mr. Mitchell did not participate in the deliberations of
the special committee or the board of directors related to the
compensation of Mr. Ward.
Since Mr. Wards appointment in June 2006, executive
compensation decisions are generally made on a semi-annual basis
by our board of directors or Mr. Ward. Each December,
Mr. Ward provides recommendations to our board of directors
regarding the compensation levels for our existing executive
officers (including himself) and our executive compensation
program. After considering these recommendations, our board of
directors adjusts base salary levels, determines the amounts of
cash bonus awards and determines the amount and vesting of
restricted stock grants for each of our executive officers. Each
June, Mr. Ward reviews and may adjust the compensation
levels of our executive officers, including his own
compensation. In making executive compensation decisions and
recommendations, Mr. Ward relies primarily on his business
judgment,
93
competitive practices and personal experience as co-founder and
former President and Chief Operating Officer of Chesapeake. In
the future, our compensation committee will adjust executive
compensation levels on a semi-annual basis based on the
recommendations of Mr. Ward.
No other named executive officer assumed an active role in the
evaluation, design or administration of our 2006 executive
officer compensation program.
Role of the Compensation Committee. We
established a compensation committee in the fourth quarter of
2007 consisting of Messrs. Gilliland, Oliver and Scott.
Messrs. Oliver and Scott have been determined to be
independent under the listing requirements of the New York Stock
Exchange by our board of directors. We expect that this
committee will consist solely of independent directors within
one year of listing. The authority of the committee includes,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
approving, in advance, the compensation and employment
arrangements for our executive officers;
|
|
|
|
reviewing all of the compensation and benefit-based plans and
programs in which our executive officers participate and
adjusting such plans and programs based on our current
management team and in anticipation of becoming a public company;
|
|
|
|
administration of our Well Participation Plan; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending all changes to our stock plan to our
board of directors, as appropriate, subject to stockholder
approval as required.
|
The charter of our compensation committee grants the committee
the sole authority to retain, at our expense, outside
consultants or experts to assist it in its duties.
Our board of directors did not engage the services of a
compensation consultant to design, review or evaluate our
executive compensation arrangements for 2006 or prior thereto.
Objectives
of our Executive Compensation Program
Prior to June 2006, our primary executive compensation strategy
was to retain our executive officers and reward performance in a
manner consistent with similar employers in Amarillo, Texas, the
former location of our headquarters. Mr. Mitchell exercised
ultimate decision making with respect the compensation of all
named executive officers.
Since June 2006, our primary executive officer compensation
strategy has been to structure our compensation program to
enable us to seek out highly qualified individuals capable of
growing the size and enterprise value of our company, complete a
successful initial public offering and effectively transition
into the new obligations we will face as a public company. Due
to our significant growth, our move from Amarillo, Texas to
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and our anticipated initial public
offering, we have hired numerous new employees, including
several of the named executive officers. These new hires have
been made in a competitive compensation environment for highly
qualified and experienced energy industry executives, frequently
from larger, established public companies. Accordingly, our
compensation philosophy has been to strategically and
opportunistically attract executive officers by offering
competitive cash compensation packages with the potential for
the increased returns associated with a high-growth company.
Our board of directors has established a number of processes to
assist it in ensuring that our executive compensation program
supports these objectives and our company culture. Among those
are competitive benchmarking and assessment of individual and
company performance, which are described in more detail below.
Competitive Benchmarking. Our board of
directors compares pay practices for our executives against
other companies to assist it in the review and comparison of
each element of compensation for our executive officers. This
practice recognizes that (1) our compensation practices
must be competitive in the marketplace and (2) marketplace
information is one of the many factors considered in assessing
the reasonableness of our executive compensation program.
94
The comparative compensation data used in our board of
directors analysis is derived solely from competitive
market analysis. For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006, our board of directors reviewed the annual reports or
similar information of Chesapeake and Devon Energy Corporation,
which are public companies within our industry of comparable or
greater size and in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (collectively,
Peer Companies). Due to our organizational
structure, comparisons of survey data to the job descriptions of
our executive officers is sometimes difficult. Furthermore, the
complexities of our operations and the skills needed of our
executive officers are, we believe, greater than those of most
companies with comparable total revenues. Therefore, we at times
target compensation levels of our Peer Companies, which are
significantly larger or more developed. Our board of directors
believes that targeting this level of compensation helps to meet
our overall total rewards strategy and executive compensation
objectives outlined above.
Our board of directors believes that these industry specific and
general industry comparisons provide the most useful information
that is reasonably assessable. The market data described above
is used collectively by our board of directors to make informed
decisions regarding executive compensation.
Assessment of Individual and Company
Performance. While we generally do not adhere to
rigid formulas in determining the amount and mix of compensation
elements, our board of directors reviews specific company
performance measures when determining the size of incentive
payouts for our executive officers. In addition, a portion of
the incentive payouts are based on evaluations of individual
performance. These performance measures are discussed in more
detail below.
Elements
of our Executive Compensation Program
In furtherance of our compensation objectives, our executive
compensation program during 2006 consisted of three basic
components:
|
|
|
|
|
base salaries;
|
|
|
|
discretionary semi-annual cash bonus awards; and
|
|
|
|
restricted stock grants.
|
Base Salaries. Since June 2006, we have
provided our executive officers and other employees with an
annual base salary to compensate them for services rendered
during the year. Our philosophy has been to establish base
salaries that are competitive with our Peer Companies. In
addition to providing a base salary that is competitive with the
market, we target salary compensation to align each
positions salary level so that it accurately reflects the
relative importance of the position within our organization. To
that end, semi-annual salary adjustments are based on a number
of individual factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the responsibilities of the officer;
|
|
|
|
period over which the officer has performed these
responsibilities;
|
|
|
|
the scope, level of expertise and experience required for the
officers position;
|
|
|
|
the strategic impact of the officers position; and
|
|
|
|
potential future contribution and demonstrated individual
performance of the officer.
|
In addition, adjustments are made based on our overall
performance and competitive market conditions. Although no
particular weight is assigned to these factors, significant
emphasis is placed on current market levels and the
individuals skills, seniority and previous industry
experience, which are evaluated on a
case-by-case
basis. For example, when reviewing Mr. Wards
experience, the special committee of our board of directors
considered that Mr. Ward co-founded and served as President
and Chief Operating Officer of Chesapeake, one of our Peer
Companies, for 17 years. For our executive officers that
were newly hired, significant emphasis was placed on the
individuals base salary level at their previous employer.
Prior to June 2006, base salaries were established based
primarily on each executive officers responsibilities at
the discretion of Mr. Mitchell. Base salary levels were
competitive with employers of similar size in Amarillo, Texas
and were adjusted from time to time at the discretion of
Mr. Mitchell.
95
Cash Bonus Awards. As one way of accomplishing
our compensation objectives, our board of directors rewards our
executive officers for their contribution to our financial and
operational success through the award of semi-annual cash
bonuses intended to encourage the attainment of our near-term
strategic, operational and financial goals and individual
performance measures. The payment of semi-annual bonuses also
facilitates the retention of our executive officers because an
executive officer must be employed by us on the relevant bonus
payment date in order to receive his or her bonus installment
payment. In addition, we have paid several of our recently hired
named executive officers cash signing bonuses. Cash bonus awards
are paid in the discretion of the board of directors upon the
recommendation of Mr. Ward.
The factors we consider when determining the amount of any
discretionary cash bonus awards are similar to those we consider
when setting and adjusting base salaries and no particular
weight is assigned to these factors. Currently, the primary
measures upon which we base cash bonus decisions are strategic
and operational, rather than financial. For example, in 2006 we
focused on the effective execution of the NEG acquisition,
successful access to capital to fund our capital expenditures
and the results of our drilling program. These goals were
selected as the most appropriate measures upon which to base the
bonus decisions because they will result in long term value to
our stockholders.
Our board of directors approves the personal goals for our Chief
Executive Officer and assesses his performance against those
goals in determining the amount of the Chief Executive
Officers cash bonus. Our board of directors expects our
Chief Executive Officer to establish and approve personal
performance goals for the other executive officers and to review
and assess each officers performance against those goals,
reporting the results to our board of directors.
The personal performance goals relate to the achievement of
goals unique to the responsibilities of the individual officer,
including, for example:
|
|
|
|
|
the successful completion of particular projects;
|
|
|
|
the attainment of productivity metrics unique to an
officers responsibilities;
|
|
|
|
management of an officers budgetary responsibilities
within specified parameters;
|
|
|
|
the acquisition and implementation of new technical knowledge;
|
|
|
|
the achievement of individual goals that further those of the
company; and
|
|
|
|
exceptional performance of functional responsibility.
|
For 2006, Messrs. Ward, Van Doren, Grubb, Dutton and McCann
each received a cash bonus payment as reflected in the Bonus
column of the Summary Compensation Table.
We generally did not pay cash bonus awards prior to
June 2006.
Restricted Stock Grants. Our board of
directors has the discretion to grant restricted stock under our
stock plan pursuant to our restricted stock awards program. Our
restricted stock awards are granted on a
semi-annual
basis and typically vest over a four-year vesting period. We
anticipate that we will continue to make grants of restricted
stock awards on a semi-annual basis. We believe these awards
help us to attract highly qualified individuals by providing the
potential for the increased returns associated with a high
growth company and better aligns the interests of our named
executive officers with those of our stockholders. In addition,
the gradual vesting period of these awards serves as a tool for
the retention of our employees.
In determining the level of equity-based compensation, we make a
subjective determination based on the same factors that are used
to determine the base salary levels described above.
96
Other
Benefits
In addition to base salaries, cash bonus awards and restricted
stock grants, we provide the following forms of compensation:
Health and Welfare Benefits. Our executive
officers are eligible to participate in medical, dental, vision,
disability insurance and life insurance to meet their health and
welfare needs. These benefits are provided so as to assure that
we are able to maintain a competitive position in terms of
attracting and retaining officers and other employees. This is a
fixed component of compensation and the benefits are provided on
a non-discriminatory basis to all of our employees in the United
States.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits. We
believe that the total mix of compensation and benefits provided
to our executive officers is competitive and perquisites should
generally not play a large role in our executive officers
total compensation. As a result, the perquisites and other
personal benefits we provide to our executive officers are
limited. Pursuant to our employment agreement with
Mr. Ward, we pay the fees and expenses related to one
country club membership in either Amarillo, Texas or Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma. In addition, Mr. Ward receives accounting
support from our employees for his personal investments and
activities. We have also agreed to provide access to an aircraft
at our expense for the personal travel of Mr. Ward and his
family and other guests who accompany him. If Mr. Ward does
not accompany his family or other guests, he will reimburse us
for the variable cost of the use of such aircraft. Mr. Ward
will pay all personal income taxes accruing as a result of
aircraft use.
401(k) Savings Plan. We have a defined
contribution profit sharing/401(k) plan, which is designed to
assist our eligible officers and employees in providing for
their retirement. We match the contributions of our employees to
the plan, in shares of our common stock, at the rate of 100% of
up to 15% of an employees eligible wages or salary.
Employees contributions are immediately 100% vested; however,
company contributions vest in equal annual increments over a
four-year period.
Well Participation Program. Mr. Ward also
has the opportunity to participate as a working interest owner
in the oil and natural gas wells that we drill. The Well
Participation Program (WPP) fosters and promotes the
development and execution of our business by: (a) retaining
and motivating our chief executive officer; (b) aligning
the financial rewards and risks of Mr. Ward with the
Company more effectively and directly than other performance
incentive programs maintained by many of our peers; and
(c) imposing on Mr. Ward the same risks we incur in
our exploration and production operations.
Employment
Agreements, Severance Benefits and Change in Control
Provisions
Employment Agreement of Tom L. Ward. We
maintain an employment agreement with our Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President, Mr. Ward, to ensure that
he will perform his role for an extended period of time. This
agreement is described in more detail elsewhere. Please read
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation
Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
Employment Agreements Employment Agreement of Tom L.
Ward. This agreement provides for severance compensation
to be paid if the employment of Mr. Ward is terminated
under certain conditions, such as a change in control and
termination without cause, each as defined in the agreement.
The employment agreement between us and Mr. Ward and the
related severance provisions are designed to meet the following
objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Control. In certain scenarios, the
potential for merger or being acquired may be in the best
interests of our stockholders. As a result, we have agreed to
provide severance compensation to Mr. Ward if his employment is
terminated following a change in control transaction to promote
the ability of Mr. Ward to act in the best interests of our
stockholders even though his employment could be terminated as a
result of the transaction.
|
|
|
|
Termination without Cause. If we terminate
Mr. Wards employment without cause, we are obligated
to pay him certain compensation and other benefits as described
in greater detail in Potential Payments upon
Termination or Change in Control below. We believe these
payments are appropriate
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
because they represent the general market triggering events
found in employment agreements of companies against whom we
compete for executive-level talent at the time these provisions
were negotiated. It is also beneficial for the Company and
Mr. Ward to have mutually agreed to a severance package
that is in place prior to any termination event. This provides
us with more flexibility to make a change in senior management
if such a change is in our and our stockholders best
interests.
|
We believe that the triggering events and severance payments set
forth under Mr. Wards employment agreement are
appropriate for the company and fair for stockholders and
represent the general market triggering events found in
employment agreements of companies against whom we competed for
executive-level talent at the time these provisions were
negotiated.
Employment Agreement of N. Malone Mitchell,
3rd. Prior to his resignation effective at the
completion of 2006, Mr. Mitchell was party to an employment
agreement with terms identical to those of the employment
agreement of Mr. Ward described above. This agreement was
entered into in June 2006, simultaneously with the employment
agreement with Mr. Ward, and was terminated upon his
resignation.
We have not entered into an employment agreement with any of our
other named executive officers and there was no severance plan
affecting our other named executive officers. See
Employment Agreements Other Executive
Officers. We intend to enter into additional employment
agreements and severance plans with other executive officers
during 2007.
Other
Matters
Stock Ownership Guidelines and Hedging
Prohibition. We do not currently have ownership
requirements or a stock retention policy for our named executive
officers. However, Mr. Wards employment agreement
requires that the value of the shares of our common stock that
he beneficially owns remain above 500% of his annual salary.
Based on Mr. Wards existing salary and the offering
price of our common stock, Mr. Ward must continue to
beneficially own at least 228,621 shares of our common
stock. Because Mr. Ward beneficially owns in excess of
31 million shares of our common stock and has shown no
indication of reducing his holdings, we have not determined how
this provision would work in practice. In the future, if we
believed there was a reasonable likelihood of this provision
being triggered, we anticipate that our compensation committee
at that time would determine the appropriate interpretation of
the employment agreement.
We do not have a policy that restricts our executive officers
from limiting their economic exposure to our stock. We will
continue to periodically review best practices and re-evaluate
our position with respect to stock ownership guidelines and
hedging prohibitions.
Tax Treatment of Executive Compensation
Decisions. Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code limits the deductibility of compensation in excess
of $1,000,000 paid to our principal executive officer, our
principal financial officer or any of the three other most
highly compensated executive officers, unless the compensation
qualifies as performance-based compensation. In
order to be deemed performance-based compensation, the
compensation must be based, among other things, on the
achievement of pre-established, objective performance criteria
and must be pursuant to a plan that has been approved by our
stockholders. Our board of directors has not yet adopted a
policy with respect to the limitation under Section 162(m).
Executive
Compensation Changes In Fiscal 2007
During 2007, we have made the following changes and adjustments
to the compensation packages of our named executive officers. We
have not modified our general compensation objectives, policies
or procedures.
Base
Salaries
Effective January 1, 2007, the annualized base salary
levels for Messrs. Ward and Grubb increased from $900,000
to $1,050,000 and $325,000 to $400,000, respectively. In
approving the increases, Mr. Ward considered the individual
factors described above under Elements of our Executive
Compensation Program Base Salaries, the
successful completion of the NEG acquisition and related
financings in November 2006
98
and subsequent integration of the acquired business, general
results of our drilling and exploration program and integration
of our new management team.
Effective July 1, 2007, the annualized base salary levels
for Messrs. Ward, Van Doren and Grubb increased from
$1,050,000 to $1,100,000, $450,000 to $500,000 and $400,000 to
$450,000, respectively. In approving the increases,
Mr. Ward considered the individual factors described above
under Elements of our Executive Compensation
Program Base Salaries, integration of our new
management team, completion of the NEG Acquisition and
successful execution of our March 2007 private placement.
Additionally, Mr. Grubb was promoted to Chief Operating
Officer and his compensation was adjusted accordingly.
Cash Bonus Awards. On January 10, 2007,
Messrs. Ward, Van Doren and Grubb received bonus
compensation in the amount of $950,000, $225,000 and $150,000,
respectively. When determining the bonus amounts, our board of
directors considered the factors described above under
Elements of our Executive Compensation Program
Cash Bonus Awards. In addition, our board of directors
took into account the same operational factors used in adjusting
base salary levels.
On July 11, 2007, Messrs. Ward, Van Doren and Grubb
received bonus compensation in the amount of $950,000, $300,000
and $200,000, respectively. When determining the bonus amounts,
our board of directors and Mr. Ward considered the factors
described above under Elements of our Executive
Compensation Program Cash Bonus Awards. In
addition, our board of directors and Mr. Ward took into
account the same operational factors used in adjusting base
salary levels.
Restricted Stock Grants. On January 10,
2007, Messrs. Ward, Van Doren and Grubb were issued
restricted stock grants of 300,000 shares,
40,000 shares and 20,000 shares, respectively. The
restricted shares vest in equal increments over a four-year
period. In determining the level of equity-based compensation,
our board of directors considered the factors described above
under Elements of our Executive Compensation
Program Restricted Stock Grants. In addition,
our board of directors took into account the same operational
factors used in adjusting base salary levels.
On July 11, 2007, Messrs. Ward, Van Doren and Grubb
were issued restricted stock grants of 325,000 shares,
60,000 shares and 25,000 shares, respectively. The
restricted shares vest in equal increments over a four-year
period. In determining the level of equity-based compensation,
our board of directors and Mr. Ward considered the factors
described above under Elements of our Executive
Compensation Program Restricted Stock Grants.
In addition, our board of directors and Mr. Ward took into
account the same operational factors used in adjusting base
salary levels.
Deferred Compensation Plan. Effective
February 1, 2007, we established a non-qualified deferred
compensation plan in order to provide our employees with
flexibility in meeting their future income needs and assisting
them in their retirement planning. Pursuant to the terms of the
deferred compensation plan, eligible highly compensated
employees are provided the opportunity to defer income in excess
of the IRS annual limitations on qualified 401(k) retirement
plans. The 2007 annual 401(k) deferral limit for employees under
age 50 is $15,500. Employees turning age 50 or over in
2007 can defer up to $20,500.
99
Summary
Compensation
The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation
awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers
for services rendered in all capacities during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006.
Summary
Compensation Table for the Year Ended December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards(9)
|
|
Compensation(10)
|
|
Total
|
|
Current Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom L. Ward
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
526,154
|
|
|
$
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
374,657
|
|
|
$
|
1,850,811
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dirk M. Van Doren
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
251,923
|
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
|
$
|
72,512
|
|
|
$
|
7,961
|
|
|
$
|
557,396
|
|
Executive Vice
President
and Chief Financial
Officer(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew K. Grubb
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
136,250
|
|
|
$
|
307,000
|
|
|
$
|
34,226
|
|
|
$
|
8,944
|
|
|
$
|
486,420
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating
Officer(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
611,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
137,692
|
|
|
$
|
749,231
|
|
Former Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and
President(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Gaines
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
89,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,437,494
|
|
|
$
|
72,739
|
|
|
$
|
1,599,656
|
|
Former Chief
Financial
Officer(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barbara Pope
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
103,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,109,000
|
|
|
$
|
136,391
|
|
|
$
|
2,349,349
|
|
Former Vice President,
Accounting(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd Dutton
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
237,021
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
377,914
|
|
|
$
|
92,502
|
|
|
$
|
717,437
|
|
Former Chief Operating Officer and Vice
President Land(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew McCann
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
183,173
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
377,914
|
|
|
$
|
72,877
|
|
|
$
|
733,964
|
|
Former Senior Vice
President Legal(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Ward was appointed as our Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer on June 8, 2006. Prior to this date, he received no
compensation from us. He was also appointed as our President
upon the resignation of Mr. Mitchell effective at the end
of 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Van Doren was appointed as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer on June 8, 2006 and began
receiving compensation effective May 15, 2006. Prior to
this date, he received no compensation from us. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Grubb became an employee on August 1, 2006. Prior
to this date, he received no compensation from us. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Mitchell served as our Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President until June 8, 2006. Following this
date, Mr. Mitchell served as our President and Chief
Operating Officer until his resignation as an executive officer,
effective as of December 31, 2006. Mr. Mitchell
continued to serve as one of our directors until his resignation
in September 2007. |
100
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Gaines served as our Chief Financial Officer until
June 8, 2006. Upon Mr. Gaines resignation, the
board of directors elected to accelerate the vesting of
83,333 shares of restricted stock held by Mr. Gaines. |
|
(6) |
|
Ms. Pope served as our Vice President, Accounting until
August 31, 2006. Upon Ms. Popes resignation, the
board of directors elected to accelerate the vesting of
111,000 shares of restricted stock held by Ms. Pope. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Dutton served as our Chief Operating Officer until June
2006 and as Vice President Land until September 2006. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr. McCann served as our Senior Vice President
Legal until May 7, 2007. |
|
(9) |
|
This column includes the dollar amount of compensation expense
we recognized for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
in accordance with FAS 123R. Pursuant to the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and regulations, the amounts
shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to
service-based vesting conditions. These amounts reflect our
accounting expense for these awards, and do not correspond to
the actual value that will be recognized by our named executive
officers. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts
are included in Note 18 to our audited financial statements
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 included in
this prospectus. See Narrative Disclosure to Summary
Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
below for a description of the material features of these awards. |
|
(10) |
|
All Other Compensation consists of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Club
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Matching
|
|
|
Relocation
|
|
|
Retention or
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership
|
|
|
Accounting
|
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Contributions to
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
Reimbursement
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Dues
|
|
|
Support
|
|
|
Use(a)
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
401(k) Plan
|
|
|
or Bonus
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
of HSR Fees
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom L. Ward
|
|
$
|
2,926
|
|
|
$
|
123,960
|
|
|
$
|
122,598
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
374,657
|
|
Dirk M. Van Doren
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
7,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,961
|
|
Matthew K. Grubb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,944
|
|
Former Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,827
|
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
137,692
|
|
John Gaines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,500
|
|
|
$
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,739
|
|
Barbara Pope
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
4,298
|
|
|
$
|
30,200
|
|
|
$
|
66,667
|
|
|
$
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
136,391
|
|
Todd Dutton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
|
$
|
10,125
|
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,502
|
|
Matthew McCann
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,877
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Value based on the incremental cost calculated per hour of use
by the named executive officer. |
|
(b) |
|
Fees paid by Mr. Ward in connection with obtaining
regulatory approval of his purchase of common stock from
Mr. Mitchell on June 8, 2006 under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. We agreed to reimburse such fees in
connection with the approval of Mr. Wards initial
investment in the company. |
101
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information about each grant of
an award made to our named executive officers in 2006 under our
stock plan pursuant to our restricted stock awards program,
including awards, if any, that have been transferred.
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Stock or Units
|
|
|
Current Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom L. Ward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dirk M. Van Doren
|
|
|
July 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
September 29, 2006
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Matthew K. Grubb
|
|
|
August 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Former Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Gaines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barbara Pope
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd Dutton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew McCann
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative
Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table
The following is a discussion of material factors necessary to
gain an understanding of the information disclosed in the
Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards
Table.
Employment
Agreements
Employment Agreement of Tom L.
Ward. Mr. Ward serves as our President and
Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an employment agreement that
is currently set to expire on June 30, 2009. Unless either
party gives written notice to terminate the agreement, the
agreement automatically renews each year on the anniversary of
the effective date for a successive three-year term.
Mr. Wards employment agreement entitles him to a base
salary of not less than $950,000, subject to increase at the
discretion of the board of directors, and the opportunity to
earn a cash bonus in the sole discretion of the board of
directors or any compensation committee thereof. The employment
agreement also provides that we will pay the fees and expenses
related to one country club membership in either Amarillo, Texas
or Oklahoma City, Oklahoma during the term of the employment
agreement. Mr. Ward receives accounting support from our
employees for his personal investments and activities. He
reimburses us for 50% of the salaries and bonuses paid to the
employees primarily engaged in supporting Mr. Ward. We have
also agreed to provide access to our aircraft at our expense for
the personal travel of Mr. Ward and his family and other
guests who accompany him. The employment agreement provides that
Mr. Ward is entitled to participate in all of our benefit
plans and programs and also contains non-compete and
confidentiality provisions in the event Mr. Wards
employment with us is terminated.
Mr. Wards employment agreement also includes
provisions governing the payment of severance benefits if his
employment is terminated by us without cause or in connection
with a Change in Control. The agreement also addresses
termination due to death or disability. For a description of
these payments, please read Potential Payments
Upon Termination or Change in Control below.
Additionally, if any of the payments or benefits described above
are subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, then
Mr. Ward is entitled to receive a
gross-up
payment equal to the amount of excise tax imposed plus all taxes
imposed on the
gross-up
payment.
102
Other Named Executive Officers. Prior to his
resignation effective at the end of 2006, Mr. Mitchell was
party to an employment agreement with terms identical to those
of the employment agreement of Mr. Ward described above.
This agreement was entered into in June 2006, simultaneously
with the employment agreement with Mr. Ward and terminated
upon his resignation. We have not entered into an employment
agreement with any of our other named executive officers.
However, we have entered into an employment agreement with
another executive officer. See Employment
Agreements Other Executive Officers. We intend
to enter into additional employment agreements with other named
executive officers in 2007.
Other Executive Officers. While we have not
entered into any employment agreements with any of our other
named executive officers, we have entered into an employment
agreement with Larry Coshow, our Executive Vice
President Land. Mr. Coshows employment
agreement is currently set to expire on September 2, 2008.
Unless we provide written notice to terminate the agreement, the
agreement automatically renews each year on the anniversary of
the effective date for a successive one year term.
Mr. Coshows employment agreement entitles him to a
base salary of not less than $300,000, a minimum bonus payment
of $175,000 during the first year of employment, and the
opportunity to earn additional bonuses in the sole discretion of
the board of directors or any compensation committee thereof.
The employment agreement also entitles Mr. Coshow to
participate in our medical, life and disability plans.
Mr. Coshows employment agreement also includes
provisions governing the payment of severance benefits if his
employment is terminated by us without cause or in connection
with a Change of Control. The agreement also addresses
termination due to death or disability.
Restricted
Stock Awards Program
Prior to 2006, the board of directors granted several of our
named executive officers restricted stock pursuant to our
restricted stock awards program which vested on the fourth and
seventh anniversaries of the date of the grant. Following the
resignations of Mr. Gaines and Ms. Pope, the board of
directors elected to accelerate the vesting of the restricted
stock that had been granted to Mr. Gaines and Ms. Pope
under the program. The board of directors also accelerated the
vesting of 25% of Mr. Duttons four-year restricted
stock upon his resignation.
Following June 2006, our restricted stock award program has
continued to be used to retain our named executive officers and
better align their interests with those of our stockholders. In
addition, the program is intended to enable us to effectively
recruit highly qualified individuals by offering the potential
for significant return following our initial public offering.
Grants of restricted stock are made in the discretion of the
board of directors. On July 1, 2006 and September 29,
2006, our board of directors approved grants of
10,000 shares of restricted stock and 25,000 shares of
restricted stock, respectively, to Mr. Van Doren, 10,000 of
which vest in 25% increments on each of the next four
anniversaries of the date of the grant, 12,500 of which vest in
25% increments on January 1, 2008 and each of the next
three anniversaries thereof, and 12,500 of which vest in 25%
increments on July 1, 2008 and each of the next three
anniversaries thereof. On August 1, 2006, the board of
directors approved a grant of 20,000 shares of restricted
stock to Mr. Grubb, 10,000 of which vest in 25% increments
on January 1, 2008 and each of the next three anniversaries
thereof and 10,000 of which vest in 25% increments on
July 1, 2008 and each of the next three anniversaries
thereof.
103
Salary
and Cash Bonus Awards in Proportion to Total
Compensation
The following table sets forth the percentage of each named
executive officers total compensation that we paid in the
form of base salary and annual cash bonus awards during 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Total
|
|
Name
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Current Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Tom L. Ward
|
|
|
79.7
|
%
|
Dirk M. Van Doren
|
|
|
85.6
|
%
|
Matthew K. Grubb
|
|
|
91.1
|
%
|
Former Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd
|
|
|
81.6
|
%
|
John Gaines
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
Barbara Pope
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
Todd Dutton
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
Matthew McCann
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards Value Fiscal Year-End
The following table reflects all outstanding equity awards held
by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2006.
Outstanding
Equity Awards as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
or Units of
|
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Name
|
|
Have Not Vested
|
|
|
Have Not Vested(1)
|
|
|
Current Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom L. Ward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dirk M. Van Doren
|
|
|
35,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
630,000
|
|
Matthew K. Grubb
|
|
|
20,000
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
360,000
|
|
Former Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Gaines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barbara Pope
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd Dutton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew McCann
|
|
|
100,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
1,800,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Valuation based on $18.00 per share. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes (a) 10,000 shares that vest in 25% increments on
each of the next four anniversaries of the date of the grant
(July 1, 2006), (b) 12,500 shares that vest in
25% increments on January 10, 2008 and each of the next
three anniversaries thereof, and (c) 12,500 shares
that vest in 25% increments on July 2, 2008 and each of the
next three anniversaries thereof. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes (a) 10,000 shares that vest in 25% increments on
January 10, 2008 and each of the next three anniversaries
thereof, and (b) 10,000 shares that vest in 25%
increments on July 1, 2008 and each of the next three
anniversaries thereof. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes (a) 66,667 shares that began to vest in 25%
increments beginning on January 1, 2007 and will continue
to vest on each of the next three anniversaries thereof, and
(b) 33,333 shares that vest June 30, 2013.
Mr. McCann forfeited all unvested shares upon his
resignation effective June 30, 2007. |
104
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table reflects the restricted stock of our named
executive officers that vested during 2006. No stock options
were outstanding in 2006.
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested for the Year Ended December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
Name
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
|
Current Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom L. Ward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dirk M. Van Doren
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew K. Grubb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Gaines
|
|
|
83,333
|
|
|
$
|
1,437,494
|
|
Barbara Pope
|
|
|
111,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,109,000
|
|
Todd Dutton
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
|
$
|
490,006
|
|
Matthew McCann
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
190,000
|
|
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Severance Under Employment Agreement of Tom L. Ward
Termination Other Than For Cause. In the event
we terminate Mr. Wards employment other than for
Cause (as defined below), Mr. Ward is entitled to receive
(1) his base salary as in effect on the date of termination
during the remaining term of the employment agreement or through
the expiration date of the agreement and (2) any vacation
pay accrued through the date of termination. If Mr. Ward
was terminated other than for Cause on December 31, 2006,
his severance would equal $2,250,000 (base salary for
30 months, which is the remaining term of his employment
agreement), and the maximum value of his accrued vacation
(assuming he took no time off during the year) would be $86,538.
For purposes of his employment agreement, the term
Cause means (1) the willful and continued
failure of Mr. Ward to perform substantially his duties
after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered
to him by the board of directors which specifically identifies
the manner in which the Board believes he has not substantially
performed his duties or (2) the willful engaging by
Mr. Ward in illegal conduct, gross misconduct or a clearly
established violation of our written policies and procedures, in
each case which is materially and demonstrably injurious to us.
An act or failure to act, on the part of Mr. Ward, will not
be considered willful unless it is done, or omitted
to be done, by him in bad faith or without reasonable belief
that the action or omission was in our best interests.
Termination in Connection with Change in
Control. In the event that Mr. Wards
employment is terminated within one year of a Change in Control
event (as defined below) other than for Cause, death or
disability, Mr. Ward is entitled to receive (1) a
single, lump sum severance payment within 10 days of
termination equal to 3 times his base salary for the last 12
calendar months and bonus paid (based on an average of the last
three years annual bonuses or such lesser number of years as he
was employed) and (2) any applicable
gross-up
payment (as defined below). To the extent that any payment or
distribution is subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of
the Code or any other interest of penalties related to such
excise tax (collectively Excise Tax), the agreement
provides we will pay an additional amount (the
Gross-Up
Payment) such that after payment by Mr. Ward of all
taxes on the
Gross-Up
Payment, he will retain an amount of the
Gross-Up
Payment equal to the Excise Tax. If Mr. Ward were
terminated within one year of a Change in Control event other
than for Cause, death or disability, his severance would equal
$5,500,000 (3 times the sum of his base salary in 2006 of
$900,000 plus his bonus of $950,000) plus a
Gross-Up
Payment equal to $2,508,535 for a total payment of $8,058,535.
105
Under the employment agreement, a Change in Control
is defined as follows: (1) the acquisition of any
individual, entity or group (within the meaning of
Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) (a
Person), other than Executive or his affiliates or
Malone Mitchell 3rd or his affiliates (the Exempt
persons), of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of
Rule 13d-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 40% or more of either
(i) the then outstanding shares of our common stock of (the
Outstanding Company Common Stock) or (ii) the
combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities
of the company entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors (the Outstanding Company Voting
Securities); (2) the individuals who, as of the date
hereof, constitute the board of directors (the Incumbent
Board) cease for any reason to constitute at least a
majority of the board of directors. Any individual becoming a
director subsequent to the date hereof whose election, or
nomination for election by our stockholders, is approved by a
vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the
Incumbent Board will be considered a member of the Incumbent
Board as of the date hereof, but any such individual whose
initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or
threatened election contest with respect to the election or
removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation
of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a person other than
the Incumbent Board will not be deemed a member of the Incumbent
Board as of the date hereof; (3) the consummation of a
reorganization, merger, consolidation or sale or other
disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the
company (a Business Combination), unless following
such Business Combination: (i) the individuals and entities
who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding
Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities
immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own,
directly or indirectly, more than 60% of respectively, the then
outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power
of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of
the corporation resulting from such Business Combination
(including, without limitation, a corporation which as a result
of such transaction owns the company or all or substantially all
of our assets either directly or through one or more
subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their
ownership, immediately prior to such Business Combination of the
Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting
Securities, as the case may be, (ii) no Person (excluding
any corporation resulting from such Business Combination or any
employee benefit plan (or related trust) of the company or such
corporation resulting from such Business Combination) other than
one or more of the Exempt Persons beneficially owns, directly or
indirectly, 40% or more of, respectively, the then outstanding
voting securities of such corporation except to the extent that
such ownership existed prior to the Business Combination and
(iii) at least a majority of the members of the board of
directors of the corporation resulting from such Business
Combination were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of
the execution of the initial agreement, or of the action of the
Board, providing for such Business Combination; or (4) the
approval by our stockholders of a complete liquidation or
dissolution of the company.
In addition, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in
any option agreement, restricted stock agreement, plan or other
agreement relating to equity based compensation, in the event of
a termination without Cause or in connection with a Change in
Control, all Mr. Wards units, stock options,
incentive stock options, performance shares, stock appreciation
rights and restricted stock (collectively awards)
will immediately become 100% vested. Further,
Mr. Wards right to exercise any previously
unexercised options will not terminate until the latest date on
which such option would expire but for Mr. Wards
termination. To the extent, we are unable to provide for one or
both of the foregoing rights, we will provide in lieu thereof a
lump-sum cash payment equal to the difference between the total
value of such awards with the foregoing rights and the total
value without the foregoing rights. Mr. Ward currently has
no unvested compensatory equity awards.
Termination for Cause. In the event
Mr. Ward is terminated for Cause, we will have no further
obligation to provide further payments or benefits. If
Mr. Ward desires to voluntarily terminate, he must give
90 days notice of his intent to termination during
which time he can use accrued vacation time or be paid for such
days. If Mr. Ward was terminated for Cause on
December 31, 2006, the maximum value of his accrued
vacation time (assuming he took no time off during the year)
would be $86,538.
106
Voluntary Termination. In the event
Mr. Ward voluntarily terminates with or without Cause, we
have no further obligations except for any obligations expressly
surviving termination of employment.
Termination due to Disability. If
Mr. Wards employment is terminated due to disability,
then he is entitled to receive base salary through the remaining
term of his employment agreement or through the Expiration Date
of the agreement. If Mr. Ward was terminated due to
disability on December 31, 2006, his severance would equal
$2,250,000 (base salary for 30 months, which is the
remaining term of his employment agreement).
Termination due to Death. In the event
Mr. Wards employment terminates due to death, then he
will be entitled to receive (1) base salary payment for
12 months after termination and (2) any accrued
benefits. If Mr. Ward was terminated due to death on
December 31, 2006, his severance would equal $900,000
(12 months salary) plus the maximum value of his
accrued vacation (assuming he took no time off during the year)
equal to $86,538.
Stock Plan
Upon disability (as defined below) or death of any named
executive officer, any benefits awarded under the 2005 Stock
Plan will become vested to the extent that vesting would have
occurred had the named executive officer remained a participant
for a period of 12 months after termination. Disability is
defined as the inability to engage in any substantial gainful
activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or
mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or
which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous
period of 12 months. An option or stock appreciation right
that is vested pursuant to disability must be exercised within
18 months or such shorter time as specified in the grant
from the date on which termination occurred or the option or
stock appreciation right will terminate. If a named executive
officer dies who was no longer a participant at the time of
death and his options or stock appreciation rights have not yet
expired, those options or stock appreciation rights may be
exercised within 12 months following death. Mr. Van
Doren holds two separate grants of 10,000 and 25,000 shares
of restricted stock respectively; only 2,500 shares of the
grant of 10,000 shares of restricted stock would vest
within the 12 months following his death or disability on
December 31, 2006. (See Outstanding Equity
Awards Fiscal Year-End for vesting schedule). The value of
the shares of restricted stock vesting upon the death or
disability of Mr. Van Doren on December 31, 2006 is
$45,000 ($18 per share times 2,500 shares). Mr. Grubb
holds 20,000 shares of restricted stock; none of his shares
would vest within 12 months of his death or disability
occurring on December 31, 2006. (See
Outstanding Equity Awards Fiscal Year-End for
vesting schedule).
Upon a Change in Control, the board of directors may take any
action with respect to outstanding Awards under the Plan as it
deems appropriate, which action may vary among Awards granted to
individual participants.
Description
of Stock Plan
Scope
Our board of directors and stockholders have approved our Stock
Plan (the Plan). The Plan authorizes the granting of
stock options to purchase common stock, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock, phantom stock and other stock-based
awards to our employees, directors and consultants. In addition,
the Plan authorizes cash-denominated awards that may be settled
in cash, stock or any combination thereof. The purpose of the
Plan is to attract, retain and provide incentives to our
officers, other associates, directors and consultants and to
thereby increase overall stockholder value.
The Plan authorizes 7,074,252 shares of common stock to be
used for awards. As of June 30, 2007, approximately
1.6 million shares had been awarded as restricted
stock subject to vesting periods of one, four and seven years
(other than shares cancelled or forfeited), and 5.6 million
shares, representing 4.2% of the outstanding shares of common
stock as of the closing of our initial public offering, 2007,
are available to be used for future awards. If an award made
under the Plan expires, terminates or is forfeited, canceled,
settled in cash without issuance of shares of common stock
covered by the award, or if award shares are used to pay for
107
other award shares, those shares will be available for future
awards under the Plan. We have not made any awards under the
Plan to date.
Eligibility
Our employees, directors and consultants may be selected by the
compensation committee to receive awards under the Plan. In the
discretion of the compensation committee, an eligible person may
receive an award in the form of a stock option, stock
appreciation right, restricted stock award, phantom stock, other
stock-based award or any combination thereof, including a
cash-based award, and more than one award may be granted to an
eligible person.
Stock Options
The Plan authorizes the award of both non-qualified and
incentive stock options (ISO). Under the Plan and
pursuant to awards made thereunder, common stock may be
purchased at a fixed exercise price during a specified time.
Unless otherwise provided in the award agreement, the exercise
price of each share of common stock covered by a stock option
shall not be less than the fair market value of the common stock
on the date of the grant of such stock option, and one-third
(1/3) of the shares covered by the stock option shall become
exercisable on the first anniversary of its grant and an
additional one-third (1/3) of such shares shall become
exercisable on each of the second and third anniversaries of its
grant. A limited number of options and SARs may be granted with
an exercise price below fair market value on the date of grant,
but not less than 75% of fair market value.
Under the Plan, an ISO may be exercised at any time during the
exercise period established by the compensation committee,
except that (i) no ISO may be exercised more than three
months after employment with us terminates by reason other than
death or disability and (ii) no ISO may be exercised more
than one year after employment with us terminates by reason of
death or disability. The aggregate fair market value (determined
at the time of the award) of the common stock with respect to
which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by any employee
during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000. The term of
each ISO is determined by the compensation committee, but in no
event may such term exceed 10 years from the date of grant
(or five years in the case of ISOs granted to stockholders
owning 10% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock).
The exercise price of ISOs cannot be less than the fair market
value of the common stock on the date of the grant (or 110% of
the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant
in the case of ISOs granted to stockholders owning 10% or more
of our outstanding shares of common stock). The exercise price
of options may be paid in cash, in shares of common stock
through a cashless exercise program with previously owned common
stock or by such other methods as the compensation committee
deems appropriate.
Stock Appreciation Rights
The Plan authorizes the grant of stock appreciation rights
(SARs). The SARs may be granted either separately or
in tandem with options. An SAR entitles the holder to receive an
amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share
of common stock at the time of exercise of the SAR over the
option exercise price or other specified amount (or deemed
option price in the event of an SAR that is not granted in
tandem with an option), multiplied by the number of shares of
common stock subject to the option or deemed option as to which
the SAR is being exercised (subject to the terms and conditions
of the option or deemed option). An SAR may be exercised at any
time when the option or deemed option to which it related may be
exercised and will terminate no later than the date on which the
right to exercise the tandem option (or deemed option)
terminates (or is deemed to terminate).
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock awards are grants of common stock made to
eligible persons subject to restrictions, terms and conditions
as established by the compensation committee. The grants of
restricted stock are issued and outstanding shares from the date
of the grant, but subject to forfeiture. An eligible person will
become the holder of shares of restricted stock free of all
restrictions if he or she complies with all restrictions, terms
and
108
conditions. Otherwise, the shares will be forfeited. The
eligible persons will not have the right to vote the shares of
restricted stock until all restrictions, terms and conditions
are satisfied.
Other Stock Based Awards
The compensation committee may grant other stock based awards,
upon such terms as it may elect.
Dollar-Denominated Awards
The compensation committee may grant an award in terms of a
specific dollar amount on such terms as it may elect. Upon the
vesting of such award, the award earned may be paid in cash,
stock or any combination thereof as the compensation committee
may choose.
Adjustments
In the event of any changes in the outstanding shares of common
stock by reason of any stock dividend, split, spinoff,
recapitalization, merger, consolidation, combination, exchange
of shares or other similar change, the aggregate number of
shares with respect to which awards may be made under the Plan,
and the terms and the number of shares of any outstanding
option, restricted stock or other stock-based award, may be
equitably adjusted by the compensation committee in its sole
discretion.
Change of Control
Upon a change in control, which is defined in the Plan to
include certain third-party acquisitions of 50% or more of our
then outstanding common stock or the combined voting power of
the then outstanding common stock entitled to vote generally in
the election of directors, changes in the composition of the
board of directors, stockholder approval of certain significant
corporate transactions such as a reorganization, merger,
consolidation, sale of assets or the liquidation or dissolution
of the company, the board of directors may take any action with
respect to outstanding Awards under the Plan as it deems
appropriate, which action may vary among Awards granted to
individual participants.
Administration
The Plan is administered by the board of directors or, if
directed by the board of directors, the compensation committee
of the board of directors or another committee designated by the
board of directors (in each event, the compensation
committee). The compensation committee makes
determinations with respect to the participation of employees,
directors and consultants in the Plan and, except as otherwise
required by law or the Plan, the grant terms of awards,
including vesting schedules, retirement and termination rights,
payment alternatives such as cash, stock, contingent award or
other means of payment consistent with the purposes of the Plan,
and such other terms and conditions as the board or the
compensation committee deems appropriate. The compensation
committee has the authority at any time to provide for the
conditions and circumstances under which awards shall be
forfeited. The compensation committee has the authority to
accelerate the vesting of any award and the time at which any
award becomes exercisable.
Termination and Amendment
The board may at any time terminate the Plan or from time to
time make such modifications or amendments of the Plan as it may
deem advisable; provided, however, that the board shall not make
any amendments to the Plan which require stockholder approval
under applicable law, rule or regulation unless approved by the
requisite vote of our stockholders. No termination, modification
or amendment of the Plan may adversely affect the rights
conferred by an award without the consent of the recipient
thereof.
109
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of
November 30, 2007 by:
|
|
|
|
|
each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more
than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
our current directors;
|
|
|
|
our named executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and
subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe
that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated
as beneficially owned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Tom L. Ward
|
|
|
31,457,707
|
(1)
|
|
|
25.3
|
%(2)
|
Dirk M. Van Doren
|
|
|
169,009
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Matthew K. Grubb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bill Gilliland
|
|
|
1,348,489
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dan Jordan
|
|
|
766,666
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Roy T. Oliver, Jr.
|
|
|
850,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Stuart W. Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Dwight Scott
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Serota
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Ares Management LLC
|
|
|
13,333,333
|
(7)
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
Entities affiliated with Farallon Partners, L.L.C.
|
|
|
6,985,068
|
(8)
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd
|
|
|
17,280,214
|
(9)
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
All directors and named executive officers as a group
|
|
|
34,591,362
|
(1)
|
|
|
27.5
|
%(2)
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes (a) 5,076,624 shares of common stock and
2,680,677 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of convertible preferred stock held by TLW Properties, L.L.C.
for which Mr. Ward exercises voting and dispositive power,
(b) 79,000 shares held through an IRA and
(c) 13,000 shares of common stock held by
Mr. Wards minor child. Does not include
6,509,601 shares held through a family trust.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes 4,170,000 shares offered directly to TLW
Properties, L.L.C., an entity controlled by Mr. Ward.
|
|
(3)
|
Such shares are held by Gillco Energy, LP, for which
Mr. Gilliland exercises voting and dispositive power.
|
|
(4)
|
Such shares are held by Oliver Active Investments, LLC, for
which Mr. Oliver exercises voting and dispositive power.
|
|
(5)
|
Mr. Scott serves as a managing director of GSO Capital
Partners LP, the investment manager for each of GSO Credit
Opportunities Fund (Helios), L.P. (GSO Helios), GSO
Special Situations Overseas Master Fund Ltd. (GSO
Overseas) and GSO Special Situations Fund LP
(GSO SS and, together with GSO Helios and GSO
Overseas, the GSO Funds). Each of GSO Helios
(286,354 shares), GSO Overseas (405,262 shares) and
GSO SS (419,495 shares) are the holders of record of our
common stock. As investment manager of the GSO Funds, GSO
Capital Partners LP is vested with investment discretion with
respect to investments held by the GSO Funds. GSO LLC (GSO
General Partner) is the general partner of GSO Capital
Partners LP, and in that capacity, directs the operations of GSO
Capital Partners LP. Bennett J. Goodman
(Mr. Goodman), J. Albert Smith III
(Mr. Smith) and Douglas I. Ostrover
|
110
|
|
|
(Mr. Ostrover and together with
Mr. Goodman and Mr. Smith, the GSO Managing
Members) are the managing members of the General Partner,
and in that capacity, direct the General Partners
operations. Each of the GSO Funds, GSO Capital Partners LP,
General Partner and the Managing Members (collectively, the
GSO Persons) may be deemed a beneficial owners of
our common stock. However, the foregoing should not be deemed to
constitute an admission that any of the GSO Persons are the
beneficial owners of any of common stock owned by the GSO Funds.
Mr. Scott disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares
of our common stock owned by the GSO Funds.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Mr. Serota is a senior partner in the Private Equity Group
of Ares Management LLC (Ares Management), a private
investment management firm that indirectly controls Ares
Corporate Opportunities Fund II, L.P. (ACOF
II), Ares SandRidge, L.P. (Ares SandRidge),
Ares SandRidge 892 Investors, L.P. (Ares 892
Investors) and Ares SandRidge Co-Invest, LLC (together
with Ares SandRidge and Ares 892 Investors, the ACOF II
AIVs). Mr. Serota disclaims beneficial ownership of
the shares owned by ACOF II and the ACOF II AIVs, except to the
extent of any pecuniary interest therein.
|
|
(7)
|
The shares of common stock listed in the table above are owned
as follows: ACOF II 7,376,636 shares; Ares
SandRidge 1,996,851 shares; Ares 892
Investors 3,126,513 shares; and Ares SandRidge
Co-Invest, LLC 833,333 shares. The general
partner of ACOF II and certain of the ACOF II AIVs is ACOF
Management II, L.P. (ACOF Management II) and the
general partner of ACOF Management II is ACOF Operating
Manager II, L.P. (ACOF Operating Manager II). ACOF
Operating Manager II is indirectly controlled by Ares
Management, which, in turn, is indirectly controlled by Ares
Partners Management Company LLC. Each of the foregoing entities
(collectively, the Ares Entities) and the partners,
members and managers thereof, other than ACOF II and the ACOF II
AIVs, disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common
stock owned by ACOF II and the ACOF II AIVs, except to the
extent of any pecuniary interest therein. The address of each
Ares Entity is 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1900, Los
Angeles, CA 90067.
|
|
(8)
|
The shares of common stock listed in the table above are owned
as follows: Farallon Capital Partners, L.P.
4,516,005 shares, 626,896 of which are issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock; Farallon Capital
Institutional Partners, L.P. 1,921,924 shares,
499,907 of which are issuable upon conversion of convertible
preferred stock; Farallon Capital Institutional Partners II,
L.P. 268,911 shares, 39,671 of which are
issuable upon conversion of convertible preferred stock;
Farallon Institutional Partners III, L.P.
139,114 shares, 23,792 of which are issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock; and Tinicum Partners,
L.P. 139,114 shares, 23,792 of which are
issuable upon conversion of convertible preferred stock. As the
general partner of each of these partnerships (such partnerships
being the Farallon Partnerships), Farallon Partners,
L.L.C. (FPLLC), may, for purposes of
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, be deemed to beneficially own the shares
beneficially owned by the Farallon Partnerships. As managing
members of FPLLC, each of William F. Duhamel, Richard B. Fried,
Monica R. Landry, Douglas M. MacMahon, William F. Mellin,
Stephen L. Millham, Jason E. Moment, Ashish H. Pant, Rajiv A.
Patel, Derek C. Schrier, Andrew J.M. Spokes, Thomas F. Steyer
and Mark C. Wehrly (together, the Farallon Managing
Members) may, for purposes of
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, be deemed to beneficially own the shares
beneficially owned by the Farallon Partnerships. Each of FPLLC
and the Farallon Managing Members disclaim any beneficial
ownership of such shares. All of the above-mentioned entities
and persons disclaim group attribution.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes (a) 485,630 shares issuable upon conversion
of convertible preferred stock and 4,548 shares of common
stock held by Dalea Partners for which Mr. Mitchell
exercises voting and dispositive power and (b) 5,000 shares
held by Mr. Mitchells minor child. The address for
Mr. Mitchell is 4801 Gaillardia Parkway, Suite 225,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73142.
|
111
No stockholder may offer or sell shares of our common stock
under this prospectus unless such stockholder has notified us of
his or her intention to sell shares of our common stock and this
prospectus has been declared effective by the SEC and remains
effective at the time such selling stockholder offers or sells
such shares. We are required to amend this prospectus to reflect
material developments in our business, financial position and
results of operations. Each time we file an amendment to this
prospectus with the SEC, it must first be declared effective
prior to the offer or sale of shares of our common stock by the
selling stockholders.
The selling stockholders listed below may from time to time
offer and sell pursuant to this prospectus all of the common
shares covered by this prospectus as indicated in the table
below, including shares issuable upon conversion of our
convertible preferred stock. The selling stockholders may not
offer or sell any of our convertible preferred stock pursuant to
this prospectus. The common shares being offered by the selling
stockholders are outstanding or issuable upon conversion of
outstanding convertible preferred stock, and were, or will be,
originally issued as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
common shares issued in connection with a private placement to
eligible investors in December 2005 and January 2006;
|
|
|
|
common shares that may be issued upon conversion of our
convertible preferred stock issued to eligible investors in
November 2006;
|
|
|
|
common shares issued in connection with a private placement of
common shares and warrants to purchase our convertible preferred
stock to eligible institutional investors in November 2006;
|
|
|
|
common shares issued in connection with a private placement to
eligible institutional investors in March 2007; and
|
|
|
|
common shares issued in March 2007 to certain holders of our
convertible preferred stock pursuant to the contractual
preemptive rights exercised in connection with the March 2007
private placement of common shares.
|
The following table, which we have prepared based on information
provided to us by the applicable selling stockholder, sets forth
the name, the number of shares of common stock beneficially
owned by the selling stockholders intending to sell our common
stock and the number of shares of common stock to be offered.
Unless set forth below, none of the selling stockholders selling
in connection with the prospectus has held any position or
office with, been employed by, or otherwise has had a material
relationship with us or any of our affiliates during the three
years prior to the date of the prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
Being
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
After
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
to Offering
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
to Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Kings Road Investments Ltd.(1)
|
|
|
2,285,138
|
|
|
|
2,285,138
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetar Capital Fund, Ltd.(2)
|
|
|
1,247,367
|
|
|
|
1,247,367
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetar Capital Fund, LP(3)
|
|
|
1,143,650
|
(4)
|
|
|
1,143,650
|
(4)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highbridge International LLC(5)
|
|
|
526,316
|
|
|
|
526,316
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portside Growth and Opportunity Fund(6)(7)
|
|
|
97,128
|
(8)
|
|
|
97,128
|
(8)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
RCG Baldwin, LP(9)(7)
|
|
|
64,387
|
(10)
|
|
|
64,387
|
(10)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
RCG Energy, LLC(11)(7)
|
|
|
196,284
|
(12)
|
|
|
196,284
|
(12)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
RCG Carpathia Master Fund, Ltd.(13)(7)
|
|
|
254,413
|
(14)
|
|
|
254,413
|
(14)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ares SandRidge, L.P.(15)
|
|
|
1,996,851
|
|
|
|
1,996,851
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Ares SandRidge Co-Invest, LLC(15)
|
|
|
833,333
|
|
|
|
833,333
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund II, L.P.(15)
|
|
|
7,376,636
|
|
|
|
7,376,636
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Ares SandRidge 892 Investors, L.P.(15)
|
|
|
3,126,513
|
|
|
|
3,126,513
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Partners(C), Ltd(16)(7)
|
|
|
1,248,690
|
(17)
|
|
|
1,248,690
|
(17)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
Being
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
After
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
to Offering
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
to Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
QRA SR, Ltd(18)(7)
|
|
|
300,084
|
(19)
|
|
|
300,084
|
(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
HBK Fund L.P.(20)(7)
|
|
|
1,500,393
|
(21)
|
|
|
1,500,393
|
(21)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
HBK Master Fund L.P.(20)(7)
|
|
|
1,960,000
|
|
|
|
1,610,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
|
SOLA Ltd.(22)
|
|
|
2,100,548
|
(23)
|
|
|
2,100,548
|
(23)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Capital LLC(24)
|
|
|
740,556
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
555,556
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Cornelis Frans Wit
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore L. Koenig
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linda Hink Kissler
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Carlton Buchanan
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Pulver Coplan
|
|
|
6,666
|
|
|
|
6,666
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dirk M. Van Doren(25)
|
|
|
221,000
|
|
|
|
111,000
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Prism Partners I, L.P.(26)
|
|
|
145,350
|
|
|
|
145,350
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prism Partners III Leveraged L.P.(27)
|
|
|
141,075
|
|
|
|
141,075
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prism Partners IV Leveraged Offshore Fund(28)
|
|
|
141,075
|
|
|
|
141,075
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles A. Vose III
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wesley West Minerals, Ltd.(29)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
RCH Energy Opportunity Fund II, L.P.(30)
|
|
|
376,471
|
|
|
|
256,471
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gary Weber
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Steven Greenberg
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mary Lou Craig
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pearson Street Limited Partnership(31)
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Leo J. Portman
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey M. Oakley
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles W. Hill
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Gibson Cooper III
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.C. Vose 1965 Trust U/A Dtd 4/07/1965(32)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy Jay Cummings
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Cullison & Diana Kissil Trust
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Gibert
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Sidney Palmour
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Montine P. Sprehe Living Trust(33)
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Price Foerster Revocable Trust(34)
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
William S. Price
|
|
|
10,750
|
|
|
|
10,750
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judith Heller Rev Trust Dated 01/07/88(35)
|
|
|
6,094
|
|
|
|
6,094
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Heller
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Heller Rev Trust U/A/D 01/07/88(36)
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Edward Bennan
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Howard & Phyllis Goldblatt Trust
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph & Eda Pell Trust
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henrik H. Hansen
|
|
|
49,949
|
|
|
|
49,949
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
KLAS Family Partners LTD(37)
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Bank of Canada(38)
|
|
|
947,833
|
|
|
|
947,833
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garrett Family Equity Investment, LLC(39)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff & Terri Nelson
|
|
|
2,630
|
|
|
|
2,630
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Nelson IRA R/O
|
|
|
5,265
|
|
|
|
5,265
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Ridge Investments, L.L.C.(40)(7)
|
|
|
884,270
|
(41)
|
|
|
884,270
|
(41)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
Being
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
After
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
to Offering
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
to Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Jeffrey A. Shaw The Shaw Revocable Trust
|
|
|
22,700
|
|
|
|
22,700
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberto J. Mendoza
|
|
|
52,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Greg & Kathleen Kern Rev. Trust
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 Investments, L.L.C.(42)
|
|
|
6,509,601
|
|
|
|
712,500
|
|
|
|
5,797,101
|
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
Tom L. Ward, IRA(43)
|
|
|
79,000
|
|
|
|
79,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom L. Ward(43)
|
|
|
23,608,406
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
23,108,406
|
|
|
|
16.64
|
%
|
|
|
16.29
|
%
|
Romi Nirel Ward(44)
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Davis Ward(45)
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott C. Hartman(46)
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott C. Hartman, IRA(46)
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Leffler
|
|
|
247,905
|
|
|
|
247,905
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom C. Blanton
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Joshua Leffler
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joshua Leffler Trust(47)
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ed Cook / Edward Hahn Cook, II
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Oliver Bolding
|
|
|
13,666
|
|
|
|
13,666
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clare Dana Schiedermayer
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
William Henry James III / Debra Herman James
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lincoln O. Clifton
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
TLW Properties, L.L.C.(48)
|
|
|
11,927,301
|
(49)
|
|
|
6,090,634
|
(49)
|
|
|
5,836,667
|
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
|
4.11
|
%
|
Marlin Capital Corp.(50)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry Allen Davies
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward L. Tucker
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
William T. Rapp 1985 Revocable Trust(51)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharon Rapp Wade Family Trust(52)
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Glen Wade
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tempo Master Fund LP(53)
|
|
|
1,529,345
|
|
|
|
1,529,345
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
GS Investment Strategies, LLC(54)
|
|
|
2,175,620
|
(55)
|
|
|
2,175,620
|
(55)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Michael Hodges
|
|
|
122,400
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
42,400
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Bar-Co Investments, LLC(56)
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
JRC Revocable Trust(57)
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dalea Partners(58)
|
|
|
490,178
|
(59)
|
|
|
490,178
|
(59)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie Givens
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn S. Harris Revocable Trust
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
RRCM Onshore I, LP(60)
|
|
|
22,079
|
|
|
|
22,079
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Gerber Merrill
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Tony Ray McKaig
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
James S. Ginsburg
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harbour Whitaker
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colley Jay Andrews
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Glenn E. Harris Roll-over IRA
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn E. Harris & Norma J. Harris Trust
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark and Elly Rogers
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rick D. Webb
|
|
|
25,823
|
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
22,222
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
Being
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
After
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
to Offering
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
to Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Chris Gordon
|
|
|
281,300
|
|
|
|
239,000
|
|
|
|
42,300
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Darvin Richard Knapp Jr.
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
McClendon Childrens Trust(61)
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael K. Shores
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Clay Coffeen
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Mark Potts
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oliver Family Trust FBO William R. Oliver (62)
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas M. Annesly
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Katrina J. Martin Revocable Trust(63)
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Oliver Family Trust FBO Jackson T. Oliver(62)
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael K. Shores
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael John Massad
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver Oak Capital LLC(64)(7)
|
|
|
1,229,385
|
|
|
|
870,292
|
|
|
|
359,093
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Leonardo, L.P.(65)(7)
|
|
|
1,229,385
|
|
|
|
359,093
|
|
|
|
870,292
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Emmanuel Labrinos and Joyce Labrinos Trust
UA 12-18-04(66)
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farallon Capital Partners, L.P.(67)
|
|
|
4,516,005
|
(68)
|
|
|
4,516,005
|
(68)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Farallon Capital Institutional Partners, L.P.(67)
|
|
|
1,921,924
|
(69)
|
|
|
1,921,924
|
(69)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Farallon Capital Institutional Partners II, L.P.(67)
|
|
|
268,911
|
(70)
|
|
|
268,911
|
(70)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farallon Capital Institutional Partners III, L.P.(67)
|
|
|
139,114
|
(71)
|
|
|
139,114
|
(71)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tinicum Partners, L.P.(67)
|
|
|
139,114
|
(71)
|
|
|
139,114
|
(71)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCW Energy Fund XB NL, L.P.(72)
|
|
|
1,096,575
|
(73)
|
|
|
1,096,575
|
(73)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCW Energy Fund XD NL, L.P.(72)
|
|
|
809,382
|
(74)
|
|
|
809,382
|
(74)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCW Asset Management Company Ensign Peak(72)
|
|
|
261,095
|
(75)
|
|
|
261,095
|
(75)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCW Asset Management Company ING Life Insurance(72)
|
|
|
261,095
|
(75)
|
|
|
261,095
|
(75)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
90,997,202
|
|
|
|
53,595,665
|
|
|
|
37,401,537
|
|
|
|
58.08
|
%
|
|
|
26.37
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Kings Road Investments Ltd. (Kings Road) is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Polygon Global Opportunities Master
Fund (the Master Fund). Polygon Investment Partners
LLP, Polygon Investment Partners LP and Polygon Investment
Partners HK Limited (the Investment Managers),
Polygon Investments Ltd. (the Manager), the Master
Fund, Alexander Jackson, Reade Griffith and Paddy Dear share
voting and dispositive power of the securities held by Kings
Road. |
|
(2) |
|
Magnetar Financial LLC is the General Partner of Magnetar
Capital Fund, Ltd. (The Magnetar Fund) and
consequently has voting control and investment discretion over
securities held by the Magnetar Fund. Magnetar Financial LLC
disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the
Magnetar Fund. Alec Litowitz has voting control over Supernova
Management LLC, the general partner of Magnetar Capital Partners
Ltd., the sole managing member of Magnetar Financial LLC. As a
result, Mr. Litowitz may be considered the beneficial owner
of any shares deemed to be beneficially owned by Magnetar
Financial LLC. Mr. Litowitz disclaims beneficial ownership
of these shares. |
|
(3) |
|
Magnetar Financial LLC is the General Partner of Magnetar
Capital Fund, LP (The Magnetar Capital Fund) and
consequently has voting control and investment discretion over
securities held by the Magnetar Capital Fund. Magnetar Financial
LLC disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the
Magnetar Capital Fund. Alec Litowitz has voting control over
Supernova Management LLC, the general partner of Magnetar
Capital Partners LP, the sole managing member of Magnetar
Financial LLC. As a result, Mr. Litowitz may be considered
the beneficial owner of any shares deemed to be beneficially
owned by Magnetar Financial LLC. Mr. Litowitz disclaims
beneficial ownership of these shares. |
115
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes 971,280 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(5) |
|
Highbridge Capital Management, LLC is the trading manager of
Highbridge International LLC and has voting control and
investment discretion over the securities held by Highbridge
International LLC. Glenn Dubin and Henry Swieca control
Highbridge Capital Management, LLC and have voting control and
investment discretion over the securities held by Highbridge
International LLC. Each of Highbridge Capital Management, LLC,
Glenn Dubin and Henry Swieca disclaims beneficial ownership of
the securities held by Highbridge International LLC. |
|
(6) |
|
Ramius Capital Group, L.L.C. (Ramius Capital) is the
investment adviser of Portside Growth and Opportunity Fund
(Portside) and consequently has voting control and
investment discretion over securities held by Portside. Ramius
Capital disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held by
Portside. Peter A. Cohen, Morgan B. Stark,
Thomas W. Strauss and Jeffrey M. Solomon are the sole
managing members of C4S & Co., L.L.C., the sole
managing member of Ramius Capital. As a result,
Messrs. Cohen, Stark, Strauss and Solomon may be considered
beneficial owners of any securities deemed to be beneficially
owned by Ramius Capital. Messrs. Cohen, Stark, Strauss and
Solomon disclaim beneficial ownership of these securities. |
|
(7) |
|
An affiliate of such selling stockholder is a broker-dealer
registered pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act.
The selling stockholder has represented that the selling
stockholder (i) purchased the securities for the selling
stockholders own account, not as a nominee or agent, in
the ordinary course of business and with no intention of selling
or otherwise distributing securities in any transaction in
violation of securities laws and (ii) at the time of
purchase, the selling stockholder did not have any agreement or
understanding, direct or indirect, with any other person to sell
or otherwise distribute the purchased securities. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 97,128 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(9) |
|
Ramius Advisors, LLC (Ramius Advisors) is the sole
member of RCG Baldwin, LP (Baldwin) and consequently
has voting control and investment discretion over securities
held by Baldwin. Ramius Advisors disclaims beneficial ownership
of the securities held by Baldwin. Ramius Capital Group, L.L.C.
(Ramius Capital) is the sole member of Ramius
Advisors. As a result, Ramius Capital may be considered the
beneficial owner of any securities deemed to be beneficially
owned by Ramius Advisors. Ramius Capital disclaims beneficial
ownership of these securities. Peter A. Cohen,
Morgan B. Stark, Thomas W. Strauss and Jeffrey M.
Solomon are the sole managing members of C4S & Co., L.L.C.,
the sole managing member of Ramius Capital. As a result, Messrs.
Cohen, Stark, Strauss and Solomon may be considered beneficial
owners of any securities deemed to be beneficially owned by
Ramius Capital. Messrs. Cohen, Stark, Strauss and Solomon
disclaim beneficial ownership of these securities. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 48,564 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(11) |
|
RCG Enterprise, Ltd (Enterprise) is the sole member
of RCG Energy, LLC (RCG Energy) and consequently has
voting control and investment discretion over securities held by
RCG Energy. Enterprise disclaims beneficial ownership of the
securities held by RCG Energy. Ramius Capital is the investment
manager of Enterprise. As a result, Ramius Capital may be
considered the beneficial owner of any securities deemed to be
beneficially owned by Enterprise. Ramius Capital disclaims
beneficial ownership of these securities. Peter A. Cohen,
Morgan B. Stark, Thomas W. Strauss and Jeffrey M.
Solomon are the sole managing members of C4S & Co., L.L.C.,
the sole managing member of Ramius Capital. As a result, Messrs.
Cohen, Stark, Strauss and Solomon may be considered beneficial
owners of any securities deemed to be beneficially owned by
Ramius Capital. Messrs. Cohen, Stark, Strauss and Solomon
disclaim beneficial ownership of these securities. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 145,682 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(13) |
|
Ramius Capital is the investment adviser of RCG Carpathia Master
Fund, Ltd. (Carpathia) and consequently has voting
control and investment discretion over securities held by
Carpathia. Ramius Capital disclaims beneficial ownership of the
securities held by Carpathia. Peter A. Cohen,
Morgan B. Stark, Thomas W. Strauss and Jeffrey M.
Solomon are the sole managing members of C4S & Co., L.L.C.,
the sole managing member of Ramius Capital. As a result, Messrs.
Cohen, Stark, Strauss and Solomon may be considered beneficial
owners of any securities deemed to be beneficially owned by
Ramius Capital. Messrs. Cohen, Stark, Strauss and Solomon
disclaim beneficial ownership of these securities. |
|
(14) |
|
Includes 194,256 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of convertible preferred stock. |
116
|
|
|
(15) |
|
Ares Management LLC (Ares Management) is a private
investment management firm that indirectly controls Ares
Corporate Opportunities Fund II, L.P. (ACOF II),
Ares SandRidge, L.P. (Ares SandRidge), Ares
SandRidge 892 Investors, L.P. (Ares 892 Investors)
and Ares SandRidge Co-Invest, LLC (together with Ares SandRidge
and Ares 892 Investors, the ACOF II AIVs) The
general partner of ACOF II and certain of the ACOF II AIVs is
ACOF Management II, L.P. (ACOF Management II) and
the general partner of ACOF Management II is ACOF Operating
Manager II, L.P. (ACOF Operating Manager II). ACOF
Operating Manager II is indirectly controlled by Ares
Management, which, in turn, is indirectly controlled by Ares
Partners Management Company LLC. Each of the foregoing entities
(collectively, the Ares Entities) and the partners,
members and managers thereof, other than ACOF II and the ACOF II
AIVs, disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common
stock owned by ACOF II and the ACOF II AIVs, except to the
extent of any pecuniary interest therein. |
|
(16) |
|
Investment Partners (C), Ltd. is controlled by its Investment
Advisor, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. BlackRock
Financial Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary
of BlackRock Inc., a publicly traded entity. |
|
(17) |
|
Includes 446,785 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(18) |
|
QRA SR, Ltd. is controlled by its Investment Advisor, BlackRock
Financial Management, Inc. BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.
is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of BlackRock Inc., a
publicly traded entity. |
|
(19) |
|
Includes 242,820 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(20) |
|
HBK Investments L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, has shared
voting and dispositive power over the Registrable Securities
pursuant to an Investment Management Agreement between HBK
Investments L.P. and the Registered Holder. HBK Investments has
delegated discretion to vote and dispose of the Registrable
Securities to HBK Services LLC. The following individuals maybe
deemed to have control over HBK Investments L.P.: Jamiel A.
Akhtar, Richard L. Booth, David C. Haley, Laurence H. Lebowitz,
and William E. Rose. |
|
(21) |
|
Includes 1,214,079 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(22) |
|
The beneficial holder of the securities is SOLA LTD
(SOLA), a Cayman Islands exempted company. The
investment advisor of SOLA is Solus Alternative Asset Management
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, which is an investment
advisor registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission under the U.S. Investment Advisors Act of 1940, as
amended. The principals of the Investment Advisors are
Christopher Pucillo, Christopher Bondy, Steven Renehan, and
Nicholas Signorile, each of whom disclaims beneficial ownership
of the securities owned by SOLA. |
|
(23) |
|
Includes 1,699,709 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(24) |
|
Solar Capital Partners, LLC is the investment advisor of Solar
Capital LLC and consequently has voting and investment power
over the Transfer Restricted Securities owned by Solar Capital
LLC. In addition, Michael S. Gross owns and controls Solar
Capital partners, LLC. As a result, Mr. Gross may be deemed
to be the beneficial owner of the Transfer Restricted Securities
owned by Solar Capital LLC. Solar Capital Partners, LLC and
Mr. Gross both disclaim beneficial ownership of the
Transfer Restricted Securities owned by Solar Capital LLC. |
|
(25) |
|
Mr. Van Doren currently serves as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
(26) |
|
Weintraub Capital Management LP is the general partner of Prism
Partners I, L.P., and Jerald M. Weintraub exercises sole
voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by
Prism Partners I, L.P. |
|
(27) |
|
Weintraub Capital Management LP is the general partner of Prism
Partners III Leveraged L.P., and Jerald M. Weintraub
exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the
shares held by Prism Partners III Leveraged L.P. |
|
(28) |
|
Weintraub Capital Management LP is the general partner of Prism
Partners IV Leveraged Offshore Fund, and Jerald M.
Weintraub exercises sole voting and dispositive power with
respect to the shares held by Prism Partners IV Leveraged
Offshore Fund. |
|
(29) |
|
Stedman West Land and Cattle Company L.L.C.
(Stedman) is the general partner of Wesley West
Minerals, Ltd. Stedman is owned by Betty Ann Stedman, Stuart W.
Stedman, Lynn Stedman Meagher and Clare Stedman. Stuart W.
Stedman is the Sole Manager of the General Partner of Stedman
and exercises sole voting and dispositive power over the shares
held by Wesley West Minerals, Ltd. |
117
|
|
|
(30) |
|
RR Advisors, LLC (RR Advisors) is the general
partner of RCH Energy Opportunity Fund II GP, L.P., which
is the general partner of RCH Energy Opportunity Fund II,
L.P. Robert Raymond is the Sole Member of RR Advisors and
William Mark Meyer is the President of RR Advisors, and each of
them shares voting and dispositive power over shares held by RCH
Energy Opportunity Fund II, L.P. |
|
(31) |
|
Shannon Self and Tiffany Self are the general and limited
partners of Pearson Street Limited Partnership. |
|
(32) |
|
Paul Brett Combs serves as Trustee. |
|
(33) |
|
Montine P. Sprehe serves as Trustee. |
|
(34) |
|
Steven Price Foerster serves as Trustee. |
|
(35) |
|
Judith Heller serves as Trustee. |
|
(36) |
|
John Heller serves as Trustee. |
|
(37) |
|
IMMT, LLC is the general partner of KLAS Family Partners, Ltd.
David A. Smith and Anna Ruth Smith are the managers of IMMT, LLC
and exercise shared voting and dispositive power over shares
held by KLAS Family Partners, Ltd. |
|
(38) |
|
Royal Bank of Canada is a publicly traded entity. |
|
(39) |
|
William P. Garrett exercises voting and dispositive power over
the shares held by Garrett Family Investment, LLC. |
|
(40) |
|
Blue Ridge Investments, L.L.C. is controlled by Bank of America
Corporation, a publicly held corporation. |
|
(41) |
|
Includes 777,003 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(42) |
|
William R. Blaik is the Manager of 192 Investments, L.L.C. and
exercises voting and dispositive control over shares held by 192
Investments, L.L.C. |
|
(43) |
|
Mr. Ward currently serves as our Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President. |
|
(44) |
|
Romi Nirel Ward is the daughter of Tom L. Ward, our Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and President. |
|
(45) |
|
James Davis Ward is the minor son of Tom L. Ward, our Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and President. |
|
(46) |
|
Mr. Hartman is currently employed by us. |
|
(47) |
|
John Leffler serves as Trustee. |
|
(48) |
|
Tom L. Ward, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
serves as Manager of TLW Properties, L.L.C. Mr. Ward
exercises voting and dispositive power over shares held by TLW
Properties, L.L.C. |
|
(49) |
|
Includes 2,680,677 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(50) |
|
Marlin Capital Corp. is controlled by Mark G. Egan. |
|
(51) |
|
William Turner Rapp serves as Trustee. |
|
(52) |
|
Sharon Rapp Wade serves as Trustee. |
|
(53) |
|
Tempo Capital Management Ltd. is the general partner of Tempo
Master Fund LP. J. David Rogers has sole voting and dispositive
power over shares held by Tempo Master Fund LP. |
|
(54) |
|
GS Investment Strategies, LLC is the Investment Manager of
Goldman Sachs Investment Partners Master Fund, L.P., which is
the direct holder of the shares referred to in footnote 55.
GS Investment Strategies, LLC has an investment team of senior
portfolio managers that are responsible for the day-to-day
management of Goldman Sachs Investment Partners Master Fund,
L.P. As a result, no single natural person has voting or
investment power over the shares held by Goldman Sachs
Investment Partners Master Fund, L.P. |
|
(55) |
|
Comprised of 2,175,620 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(56) |
|
Jackie Cooper and Barbara Cooper exercise voting and dispositive
power of the shares held by Bar-Co Investments, LLC. |
|
(57) |
|
Jackie Cooper serves as Trustee. |
|
(58) |
|
Dalea Partners is controlled by N. Malone Mitchell 3rd, our
former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. |
|
(59) |
|
Includes 485,630 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
118
|
|
|
(60) |
|
RoundRock Capital Management, LLC (RoundRock) is the
general partner of RRCM Onshore I, LP. Peter Vig is the
owner of RoundRock and exercises sole voting and dispositive
power over shares held by RRCM Onshore I, LP. |
|
(61) |
|
John D. Garrison serves as Trustee. |
|
(62) |
|
Thomas M. Annesly serves as Trustee. |
|
(63) |
|
Katrina J. Martin serves as Trustee. |
|
(64) |
|
Silver Oak Capital, L.L.C. holds the shares as nominee for
private investment funds and separately managed accounts managed
by Angelo, Gordon & Co., L.P. Mr. John M.
Angelo and Mr. Michael L. Gordon are controlling
members of Silver Oak Capital, L.L.C. and, in such capacities,
may be deemed to have beneficial ownership over the shares and
other securities held for the account of Silver Oak Capital,
L.L.C. Mr. Angelo and Mr. Gordon disclaim beneficial
ownership of the shares and other securities held by Silver Oak
Capital L.L.C. |
|
(65) |
|
Leonardo Capital Management, Inc. (LCMI) is the sole
general partner of Leonardo, L.P. Angelo, Gordon &
Co., L.P. (Angelo, Gordon) is the sole director of
LCMI. John M. Angelo and Michael L. Gordon are the
principal executive officers of Angelo, Gordon. Each of Angelo,
Gordon and Messrs. Angelo and Gordon disclaim beneficial
ownership of the shares held by Leonardo, L.P. |
|
(66) |
|
Emmanuel and Joyce K. Labrinos serve as Trustees. |
|
(67) |
|
As the general partner of each of the noted partnerships (such
partnerships being the Farallon Partnerships),
Farallon Partners, L.L.C. (FPLLC), may, for purposes
of Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, be deemed to beneficially own the shares beneficially
owned by the Farallon Partnerships. As managing members of
FPLLC, each of William F. Duhamel, Richard B. Fried,
Monica R. Landry, Douglas M. MacMahon, William F.
Mellin, Stephen L. Millham, Jason E. Moment,
Ashish H. Pant, Rajiv A. Patel, Derek C. Schrier,
Andrew J.M. Spokes, Thomas F. Steyer and Mark C.
Wehrly (together, the Farallon Managing Members)
may, for purposes of Rule 13d-3 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, be deemed to beneficially own
the shares beneficially owned by the Farallon Partnerships. Each
of FPLLC and the Farallon Managing Members disclaim any
beneficial ownership of such shares. All of the above-mentioned
entities and persons disclaim group attribution. |
|
(68) |
|
Includes 626,896 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(69) |
|
Includes 499,907 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(70) |
|
Includes 39,671 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(71) |
|
Includes 23,792 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(72) |
|
TCW Asset Management Company is the ultimate general partner or
investment manager and
sub-custodian
of the entity and is a subsidiary of Société
Générale, a publicly-held corporation. |
|
(73) |
|
Comprised of 1,096,575 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(74) |
|
Comprised of 809,382 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
(75) |
|
Comprised of 261,095 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible preferred stock. |
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
We prepared this table based on the information supplied to us
by the selling stockholders named in the table, and we have not
sought to verify such information.
The selling stockholders listed in the above table may have sold
or transferred, in transactions exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act, some or all of the shares of
our common stock since the date on which the information in the
above table was provided to us. Information about the selling
stockholders may change over time.
Because the selling stockholders may offer all or some of their
shares of our common stock from time to time, we cannot estimate
the number of shares of our common stock that will be held by
the selling stockholders upon the termination of any particular
offering by such selling stockholder. Please refer to Plan
of Distribution.
119
We are registering the common stock covered by this prospectus
to permit selling stockholders to conduct public secondary
trading of these shares from time to time after the date of this
prospectus. In connection with our December 2005, November 2006
and March 2007 private placements, we entered into Registration
Rights Agreements with the selling stockholders, pursuant to
which we agreed to, among other things, bear all expenses, other
than brokers or underwriters discounts and
commissions, in connection with the registration and sale of the
common stock covered by this prospectus. We will not receive any
of the proceeds of the sale of the common stock offered by this
prospectus. The aggregate proceeds to the selling stockholders
from the sale of the common stock will be the purchase price of
the common stock less any discounts and commissions. A selling
stockholder reserves the right to accept and, together with
their agents, to reject, any proposed purchases of common stock
to be made directly or through agents.
The common stock offered by this prospectus may be sold from
time to time to purchasers:
|
|
|
|
|
directly by the selling stockholders and their successors, which
includes their donees, pledgees or transferees or their
successors-in-interest, or
|
|
|
|
through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, who may receive
compensation in the form of discounts, commissions or
agents commissions from the selling stockholders or the
purchasers of the common stock. These discounts, concessions or
commissions may be in excess of those customary in the types of
transactions involved.
|
The selling stockholders and any underwriters, broker-dealers or
agents who participate in the sale or distribution of the common
stock may be deemed to be underwriters within the
meaning of the Securities Act. Any selling stockholder that is a
registered broker-dealer will be deemed to be an underwriter. As
a result, any profits on the sale of the common stock by such
selling stockholders and any discounts, commissions or
agents commissions or concessions received by it may be
deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the
Securities Act. Selling stockholders who are deemed to be
underwriters within the meaning of
Section 2(11) of the Securities Act will be subject to
prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act.
Underwriters are subject to certain statutory liabilities,
including, but not limited to, Sections 11, 12 and 17 of
the Securities Act.
The common stock may be sold in one or more transactions at:
|
|
|
|
|
fixed prices;
|
|
|
|
prevailing market prices at the time of sale;
|
|
|
|
prices related to such prevailing market prices;
|
|
|
|
varying prices determined at the time of sale; or
|
|
|
|
negotiated prices.
|
These sales may be effected in one or more transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
on any national securities exchange or quotation on which the
common stock may be listed or quoted at the time of the sale;
|
|
|
|
in the
over-the-counter
market;
|
|
|
|
in transactions other than on such exchanges or services or in
the
over-the-counter
market;
|
|
|
|
through the writing of options (including the issuance by the
selling stockholders of derivative securities), whether the
options or such other derivative securities are listed on an
options exchange or otherwise;
|
|
|
|
through the settlement of short sales; or
|
|
|
|
through any combination of the foregoing.
|
120
These transactions may include block transactions or crosses.
Crosses are transactions in which the same broker acts as an
agent on both sides of the trade.
In connection with the sales of the common stock, the selling
stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with
broker-dealers or other financial institutions which in turn may:
|
|
|
|
|
engage in short sales of the common stock in the course of
hedging their positions;
|
|
|
|
sell the common stock short and deliver the common stock to
close out short positions;
|
|
|
|
loan or pledge the common stock to broker-dealers or other
financial institutions that in turn may sell the common stock;
|
|
|
|
enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or
other financial institutions that require the delivery to the
broker-dealer or other financial institution of the common
stock, which the broker-dealer or other financial institution
may resell under the prospectus; or
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions in which a broker-dealer makes purchases
as a principal for resale for its own account or through other
types of transactions.
|
To our knowledge, there are currently no plans, arrangements or
understandings between any selling stockholders and any
underwriter, broker-dealer or agent regarding the sale of the
common stock by the selling stockholders.
Our common stock is listed on NYSE under the symbol SD.
There can be no assurance that any selling stockholder will sell
any or all of the common stock under this prospectus. Further,
we cannot assure you that any such selling stockholder will not
transfer, devise or gift the common stock by other means not
described in this prospectus. In addition, any common stock
covered by this prospectus that qualifies for sale under
Rule 144 or Rule 144A of the Securities Act may be
sold under Rule 144 or Rule 144A rather than under
this prospectus. The common stock covered by this prospectus may
also be sold to
non-U.S. persons
outside the U.S. in accordance with Regulation S under
the Securities Act rather than under this prospectus. The common
stock may be sold in some states only through registered or
licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the
common stock may not be sold unless it has been registered or
qualified for sale or an exemption from registration or
qualification is available and complied with.
The selling stockholders and any other person participating in
the sale of the common stock will be subject to the Exchange
Act. The Exchange Act rules include, without limitation,
Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and
sales of any of the common stock by the selling stockholders and
any other such person. In addition, Regulation M may
restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution
of the common stock to engage in market-making activities with
respect to the particular common stock being distributed. This
may affect the marketability of the common stock and the ability
of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities
with respect to the common stock.
We have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against
certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities
Act.
We have agreed to pay substantially all of the expenses
incidental to the registration, offering and sale of the common
stock to the public, including the payment of federal securities
law and state blue sky registration fees, except that we will
not bear any underwriting discounts or commissions or transfer
taxes relating to the sale of shares of our common stock.
121
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following is a discussion of transactions between us and our
officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 5% of our
common stock. During the fourth quarter of 2007, we adopted a
written policy requiring any related party transaction (as
defined below) to be reviewed and approved by the disinterested
members of our board of directors. A related party transaction
is a transaction, proposed transaction, or series of similar
transactions, in which (a) we are a participant,
(b) the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and (c) a
related person (as defined below) has or will have a direct or
indirect material interest. A related person is (i) any
person who is, or at any time since the beginning of our last
fiscal year was, a director, executive officer, or nominee to
become a director, (ii) a person known to be the 5%
beneficial owner of any class of our voting securities,
(iii) an immediate family member of any of the foregoing
persons, which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent,
spouse, sibling,
mother-in-law,
father-in-law,
son-in-law,
daughter-in-law,
brother-in-law,
or
sister-in-law
of such director, executive officer, nominee for director or
more than 5% beneficial owner, and (iv) any person (other
than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such
director, executive officer, nominee for director or more than
5% beneficial owner. The written policy includes factors for
disinterested board members to consider in exercising their
judgment including terms of the transaction with the related
party, availability of comparable products or services from
unrelated third parties, terms available from unrelated third
parties and the benefits to us.
Well
Participation Plan
On June 8, 2006, we adopted the Well Participation Program
(the WPP) which permitted Messrs. Ward and
Mitchell to participate as working interest owners in the wells
that we drill in the future. The WPP was adopted at a time when
Mr. Ward proposed to become a significant stockholder of
the Company. Our board of directors view was that drilling
participation by senior management with significant ownership in
us was in our best interest. The payment of proportionate costs
of drilling of these wells is similar to a heads up
drilling participation that we may, from time to time, enter
into with unaffiliated industry participants on specific wells.
Mr. Mitchell ceased to participate in the WPP upon his
resignation, effective December 31, 2006. On
September 21, 2007, Mr. Mitchell agreed to sell us all of
his interests under the WPP. Please see Other
Transactions with N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd. Mr. Ward
remains a participant in the WPP.
Under the WPP, Mr. Ward is permitted to participate in all
of the Program Wells, as defined in the WPP, spudded by or on
behalf of SandRidge during each calendar year. In order to
participate, at least 30 days prior to the beginning of
each year, Mr. Ward must provide written notice to the
members of the board of directors of his election to participate
in the WPP and the percentage working interest which the
participant proposes to participate with during the year.
Mr. Wards working interest percentage may not exceed
a 3.0% working interest. Mr. Mitchell participated for a
2.0% working interest from June 8, 2006 through
December 31, 2006, his effective date of resignation as an
officer of SandRidge. Mr. Ward does not participate in any
well where our working interest after Mr. Wards
participation would be reduced to below 12.5%. If Mr. Ward
fails to provide notice of his election to participate or of the
working interest percentage, the amount of the working interest
percentage for the relevant calendar year will be deemed to be
equal to the working interest percentage for the immediately
preceding calendar year. Mr. Ward has participated for a
3.0% working interest in 2006 and elected to a 3.0% working
interest for 2007.
The WPP is administered and interpreted by a committee of the
board of directors consisting of Messrs. Gilliland and
Jordan. Once a compensation committee is established, it will
administer and interpret the WPP. In addition, the board of
directors, in its sole discretion, may take any action with
respect to the WPP that would otherwise be the responsibility of
or delegated to the compensation committee. The board of
directors has the right to suspend or terminate the WPP after
December 31, 2015 by providing written notice of
termination to Mr. Ward one year before the effective date
of such termination. Mr. Wards right to participate
in the WPP during any calendar year will terminate on the
earlier of (1) December 31 of such year; (2) the
termination of Mr. Wards employment by us for cause
or death; or (3) the expiration or termination of any and
all covenants not to compete subsequent to the termination of
Mr. Ward for any reason not included in the foregoing
clause (2).
122
Mr. Wards working interest percentage cannot be
changed during any calendar year without the prior approval of
the compensation committee. Participation by Mr. Ward under
the WPP is conditioned on his participation in each Program Well
spudded during the calendar year in an amount equal to the
greater of the elected working interest percentage or his prior
interest in the drilling unit for such Program Well.
The amount paid by Mr. Ward for the acreage assigned in
connection with his participation in the WPP is computed as of
the first day of each calendar year and is equal to the
following amount computed on a per acre basis: (1) all
direct third-party costs paid by the Company Entities (as
defined in the WPP) and capitalized in the appropriate
accounting pool in accordance with our accounting procedures
(including capitalized interest, leasehold payments, acquisition
costs, landman charges and seismic charges); divided by
(2) the acreage in the applicable pool. The acreage charge
amount is recomputed by us as of the first day of each calendar
year and submitted to the compensation committee for approval.
All other costs for Program Wells are billed in accordance with
our accounting procedures applicable to third-party participants
pursuant to any applicable joint operating agreement or
exploration agreement relating to a particular Program Well.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, in each case the
participants participation in a Program Well will be on no
better terms than the terms agreed to by unaffiliated
third-party participants in connection with the participation in
such Program Well or similar wells operated by the Company
Entities.
Since the inception of the Well Participation Program in 2006,
Messrs. Ward and Mitchell have participated in the drilling
of 209 and 127 Program Wells, respectively. During 2006,
Messrs. Ward and Mitchell were invoiced $1,951,904 and
$1,592,136, respectively, for their share of costs for their
interests in Program Wells, and received oil and gas revenues
from their interests in Program Wells totaling $17,560 and
$11,707 respectively. During the first six months of 2007,
Messrs. Ward and Mitchell were invoiced $8,024,948 and
$2,436,192, respectively, for their share of costs for their
interests Program Wells, and received oil and gas revenues from
all of their interests in all Program Wells, including Program
Wells drilled in 2006, totaling $945,701 and $530,232,
respectively Mr. Mitchell has agreed to sell us all of his
interests under the WPP. Please see the Other
Transactions with N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd.
Employee
Participation Plan
We adopted an Employee Participation Plan in December 2005 that
allowed certain employees to participate in the drilling of
natural gas and oil wells of our company for up to 5% of our
interest in the well. Before that date, a similar plan was
informally administered. Our board of directors view was
that drilling participation by these key employees was in our
best interest. We provided certain employees, including our
named executive officers, an allowance to participate in these
wells. These allowances were funded by us and treated as
compensation. Participating employees were all entitled to
invest amounts in addition to the Company funded allocations
under the plan. The purpose of the plan was to associate the
interest of our employees with the stockholders, maintain
competitive compensation levels and provide an incentive for
employees to continue employment with us. The plan was
terminated effective for all wells drilled on or after
May 1, 2006. From January 1, 2006 through the
termination of the plan, we awarded $707,000 in allowances under
the plan, including $35,000 for each of Mr. Gaines and Ms.
Pope and $42,000 for each of Mr. Dutton and
Mr. McCann. These allowances were treated as coupons from
the Company. Following the termination of the plan, all
interests in the plan were assigned to the applicable
participant and no further payments were made pursuant to the
plan.
No current executive officers of the Company participated in the
Employee Participation Plan. During 2006, the following former
executive officers were invoiced or assessed compensatory
allowances for costs for their interests in the plan wells:
Ms. Pope $98,399; Mr. Dutton
$83,184; Mr. Gaines $46,902;
Mr. McCann $338,635; and each of these former
executive officers received oil and gas revenues from their
interests in all plan wells, including interests in plan wells
drilled in prior years, in the following amounts: Ms. Pope
- $65,439; Mr. Dutton $18,491;
Mr. Gaines $9,746; Mr. McCann
$250,178.
During the first six months of 2007, the following former
executive officers were invoiced for costs for their interests
in the plan wells: Ms. Pope $11,485;
Mr. Dutton $5,351; Mr. Gaines
$3,287; Mr. McCann $43,879; and each of these
former executive officers received oil and gas revenues from
their interests in plan wells, including interests in wells
drilled in prior years, in the following amounts:
Ms. Pope
123
$30,826; Mr. Dutton $10,378;
Mr. Gaines $6,539; Mr. McCann
$152,640. Following their departure from the Company in 2007,
the Company purchased the interests in all plan wells from three
of the former executive officers in negotiated acquisitions for
the following cash payments: Ms. Pope $201,581;
Mr. Dutton $75,394; Mr. Gaines - $53,534.
December
2005 Transactions
In December 2005, we entered into the following transactions
with related parties as part of an effort to consolidate various
interests in energy assets held by management, directors and
independent third parties:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of interests in our Piceance Basin acreage, West
Texas undeveloped acreage and Larco from Mr. Jordan, a
director and our former Vice President, Business, for
1,418,182 shares of common stock valued at $15 per share;
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of interests in PetroSource, our Piceance Basin
acreage and our Missouri and Nevada projects from Gillco Energy,
L.P., an entity controlled by Mr. Gilliland, a director,
for 1,406,000 shares of common stock valued at $15 per
share; and
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of an interest in PetroSource from
Mr. McCann, our former Senior Vice President
Legal, for $135,000.
|
The disinterested members of our board of directors reviewed and
approved the terms of the transactions with Messrs. Jordan,
Gilliland and McCann. Simultaneously with the consummation of
these transactions, we purchased other interests in the same
assets from independent third parties on substantially similar
terms and at substantially similar prices.
Private
Placements
Affiliates of Mr. Ward and Mr. Mitchell purchased
securities in our November 2006 and March 2007 private
placements. Affiliates of Mr. Ward purchased
262,857 shares of our convertible preferred stock in our
November 2006 private placement for $210 per share and
3,409,957 shares of common stock in our March 2007 private
placement for $18 per share. Affiliates of
Mr. Mitchell purchased 47,619 shares of our
convertible preferred stock in our November 2006 private
placement for $210 per share and 4,548 shares of
common stock in connection with a preemptive right in our March
2007 private placement for $18 per share. These purchases
were on identical terms and at identical prices as purchases
made by independent third parties.
Other
Transactions With N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd
Mr. Mitchell, our former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President, and his family, on September 30, 2005,
traded 2.5% of our then outstanding common stock to us for our
100% interest in Longfellow Ranch Partners, LP
(Longfellow). The purpose of this transaction was to
separate the Longfellow ranch operations from our ongoing energy
operations. While this transaction was approved by our board of
directors and a majority of our stockholders, none of our
directors at that time were disinterested and Mr. Mitchell
controlled a majority of our outstanding common stock. Because
of the unique nature of the transaction and the fact that none
of our current officers or directors were officers or directors
of the company at that time, we are unable to determine whether
this transaction was on terms similar to those obtainable from
third parties. Longfellow owns surface or minerals or royalty
under a significant amount of our exploration and development
lands in West Texas, including the WTO. We have natural gas and
oil leaseholds that cover all of Longfellows minerals.
Under the leases, we will pay Longfellow royalties, based on
production. The lease is for a seven-year primary term, with the
option of extending the primary term another three years by
paying a market value bonus. The lease royalty is 20% for wells
completed before 2009, escalating to maximum of 25% in 2012. At
the end of the primary term, the lease will break into
approximately 3,000-acre tracts, and each tract will be subject
to a 120-day
continuous development clause. We also are party to a surface
use agreement with Longfellow for use of the surface of the
Longfellow Ranch. Under this agreement, we pay Longfellow fees,
pursuant to a set schedule, for use of the surface for our
natural gas and oil operations and for damages and rights of
way. We believe the rates are equivalent to, or less than, the
rates paid to other landowners in the area. As described below,
this agreement was amended and restated on September 21,
2007. For 2003, 2004
124
and the nine months ended September 30, 2005, when
operations were discontinued income (loss) from
Longfellows operations were ($128,000), $683,000 and
$638,000, respectively. These numbers included, among other
things, royalties, damages and agricultural operations on the
lands, minerals and royalties now indirectly owned by the
Mitchell family. For the last three months of 2005, the year
ended 2006, and the six months ended June 30, 2007, we paid
Longfellow $1,019,710, $4,156,082 and $1,458,958, respectively.
On November 29, 2007, pursuant to a letter agreement with
Mr. Mitchell, Longfellow and certain of his affiliates, we
purchased certain natural gas and oil working interests from
Mr. Mitchell for a cash purchase price of $32 million.
These natural gas and oil interests included the interests
located on the West Ranch, a ranch adjacent to Longfellow Ranch
recently acquired by Mr. Mitchell. The natural gas and oil
interests also included all other working interests of
Mr. Mitchell and his affiliates in wells and leasehold
acreage owned or operated by us or our affiliates, including
interests owned through our Well Participation Program. For the
years 2004, 2005, 2006 and the six months ended June 30,
2007, we paid Mr. Mitchell $147,000, $170,963, $140,538 and
$18,183, respectively, in connection with his ownership interest
in these assets. In connection with the letter agreement, we
also entered in to an amended and restated surface use and
rights agreement regarding our access and use of the surface of
lands owned by Mr. Mitchell in connection with our natural
gas and oil interests on such lands.
The disinterested members of our board of directors determined
that the transactions contemplated by the letter agreement,
including the amended and restated surface use agreement, are on
terms not materially less favorable than those that might
reasonably have been obtained in a comparable transaction on an
arms-length basis from a party that is not our affiliate and are
fair to us from a financial point of view. Simultaneously with
the execution of the letter agreement, Mr. Mitchell
resigned as a director.
In August 2006, Mr. Mitchell acquired our interest in
entities which owned Stockton Plaza, a commercial shopping
center located in Fort Stockton, Texas, a restaurant
franchise, and other non-core assets and investments, for an
aggregate purchase price of $6,128,899. This transaction was
determined to be in our best interests by the disinterested
members of our board of directors and we believe it to be on
terms similar to those available from unaffiliated third parties.
On May 2, 2007, we acquired oil and gas leaseholds on
mineral interests held by the State of Texas underlying surface
properties owned by Longfellow. Under Texas law, Longfellow
executed these leases as agent for the State of Texas and is
entitled to receive one-half of the payments made to the lessor
under the leases. As a result, we paid Longfellow
$8.3 million for its share of lease bonus payments. The
terms of these lease transactions were similar to other State of
Texas lease transactions that we negotiated in the ordinary
course of our business with third party surface owners for
nearby leaseholds. Our senior officers negotiated the terms of
the lease transactions at arms length with Mr. Mitchell,
acting as an officer of Longfellow in its capacity as agent for
the State of Texas, and the transactions were approved by the
disinterested members of our board of directors.
Other
Transactions With Dan Jordan
Mr. Jordan, a director and our former Vice President,
Business, has participated in projects since 2000. In March
2006, we acquired Mr. Jordans 12.5% interest in
PetroSource for $5,489,401. In July 2006 we acquired
Mr. Jordans interests in our producing natural gas
and oil properties for $9,000,000. For the years 2004, 2005,
2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2007, we recognized
the capital contributions from Mr. Jordan related to our
drilling projects of $4,274,000, $5,670,081, $2,397,188 and
$324,950, respectively. For the same periods, we paid
Mr. Jordan $1,532,000, $2,113,020, $1,496,598 and $6,156,
respectively. From August 2002 until October 2005, he received
consulting fees from Larco of $40,000 per month. In June 2007,
we purchased all of the interests in twelve producing wells and
one well being drilled, which interests were owned by Wallace
Jordan, LLC, a limited liability company a majority interest in
is owned and controlled by Mr. Jordan (Wallace
Jordan). In addition and as a part of this same
transaction, we purchased the interest owned by Wallace Jordan
in the Sabino pipeline and the West Piñon Gathering System
and certain oil and gas leases covering lands in Pecos County,
Texas, as well as the interest owned by Mr. Jordan
individually in Integra Energy. The purchase price for these
assets was $3.3 million plus the reimbursement of
approximately
125
$236,000 of costs attributable to Wallace Jordans 10%
working interest in one of our wells. Each of the transactions
with Mr. Jordan was determined to be in our best interests
by the disinterested members of our board of directors. We
believe the terms of these transactions were similar to those
that could have been obtained from an unrelated third party.
Other
Transactions With Bill Gilliland
Mr. Gilliland has served as a director since January 2006.
In 2003, Mr. Gilliland assisted us in the acquisition of
the PetroSource assets and acquired an approximate 18.8%
interest in PetroSource through Gillco Energy, L.P. Through that
same entity, he also participated in our Piceance Basin acreage,
and various drilling projects in Missouri and Nevada. As
described above under December 2005
Transactions, we acquired these interests in December
2005. In February 2006, we acquired an office building in
Midland, Texas from a partnership affiliated with
Mr. Gilliland for $950,000. This transaction was determined
to be in our best interests by the disinterested members of our
board of directors. We believe the terms of this transaction
were similar to those that could have been obtained from an
unrelated third party.
Transaction
With Roy Oliver
In September 2006, we entered into a new facilities lease with a
director, Mr. Oliver. The lease extends to August 2009 with
annual future rental payments of $1.1 million in 2007 and
2008 and $0.7 million in 2009. The terms of the lease were
received and approved by our board of directors and we believe
that the rent expense it must pay under this lease is at fair
market rates. Rent expense in 2006 related to this facilities
lease was $0.3 million.
126
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
Our authorized capital stock consists of 400,000,000 shares
of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and
50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value. As of
November 30, 2007, we had 141,845,661 outstanding shares of
common stock and 2,184,286 shares of convertible preferred
stock outstanding. We have no outstanding options to purchase
common stock, however, we have granted restricted stock awards
for approximately 1.6 million shares (other than shares
cancelled or forfeited).
Common
Stock
Subject to any special voting rights of any series of preferred
stock that we may issue in the future, each share of common
stock has one vote on all matters voted on by our stockholders,
including the election of our directors. Because holders of
common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, the holders
of a majority of the shares of common stock can elect all of the
members of the board of directors standing for election, subject
to the rights, powers and preferences of any outstanding series
of preferred stock.
No share of common stock affords any preemptive rights or is
convertible, redeemable, assessable or entitled to the benefits
of any sinking or repurchase fund. Holders of common stock will
be entitled to dividends in the amounts and at the times
declared by our board of directors in its discretion out of
funds legally available for the payment of dividends.
Holders of common stock will share equally in our assets on
liquidation after payment or provision for all liabilities and
any preferential liquidation rights of any preferred stock then
outstanding. All outstanding shares of common stock are fully
paid and non-assessable.
Preferred
Stock
Convertible
Preferred Stock
Dividends. Each holder of our convertible
preferred stock is entitled to receive a quarterly cash dividend
at an annual rate of 7.75% of the accreted value of each share
of convertible preferred stock held by such holder. The accreted
value is currently $210 per share. In lieu of making any
such quarterly cash dividend, we may, at our option, increase
the accreted value of each share of convertible preferred stock
by 2.3125% of the existing accreted value. We are prohibited
from paying any cash dividends on any capital stock junior or
equal in rank to our convertible preferred stock, including our
common stock, without the consent of holders of a majority of
our outstanding convertible preferred stock. In addition, each
holder is entitled to any dividend or distribution made with
respect to our common stock as if such holder had converted its
shares of convertible preferred stock to common stock on the
record date.
Voting. Each holder of our convertible
preferred stock is entitled to vote with the holders of our
common stock on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders
as if such holder had converted its shares of convertible
preferred stock to common stock on the record date for such
vote. In addition, certain actions, including the issuance of
any capital stock senior or equal in rank to our convertible
preferred stock, any amendment to our Certificate of
Incorporation and certain other fundamental transactions, shall
require the approval of the holders of a majority of our
convertible preferred stock.
Liquidation. In the event of any voluntary or
involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of SandRidge, subject to the payments of any debts or other
liabilities of SandRidge and prior to any payment to the holders
of our common stock, each holder of our convertible preferred
stock shall receive with respect to each share an amount equal
to the greater of (i) the accreted value as of the date of
the liquidation and (ii) the amount that such holder would
have received had it converted its shares of convertible
preferred stock on the date of such liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up.
Conversion at the Option of the Holders. Each
holder of our convertible preferred stock may convert any or all
of its shares into common stock at any time. The shares of
convertible preferred stock shall be converted into a number of
shares of common stock equal to the product of the number of
shares of
127
convertible preferred stock being converted multiplied by the
quotient of (i) the accreted value and (ii) the
conversion price. The conversion price is currently
$20.59 per share.
Issuances of common stock following our proposed initial public
offering will not result in any adjustment to the conversion
price.
Conversion at the Option of SandRidge. At any
time after 180 days following our proposed initial public
offering, if the conditions described below have been satisfied,
we may, at our option, cause all the shares of convertible
preferred stock to be converted into a number of shares of
common stock equal to the number of shares of convertible
preferred stock multiplied by the quotient of (i) the
accreted value and (ii) the conversion price then in
effect. We may not effect such a conversion unless the following
conditions have been satisfied:
|
|
|
|
|
we have completed our proposed initial public offering or an
offering of similar size and price;
|
|
|
|
this shelf registration statement shall be effective;
|
|
|
|
our common stock is listed on a national exchange and the
closing price exceeds 100% of the conversion price for at least
20 trading days in any 30 consecutive trading day
period; and
|
|
|
|
certain other conditions, including no event of default.
|
In connection with any conversion by us, unless the closing
price of our common stock exceeds 150% of the conversion price
for at least 20 trading days in any 30 consecutive trading day
period, we must also make a payment to each holder of shares of
convertible preferred stock equal to (i) the accreted
value, multiplied by (ii) 0.155.
Warrant
to Purchase Convertible Preferred Stock
We have issued warrants to purchase 482,381 shares of our
convertible preferred stock. Generally, the warrant entitles the
warrantholder to exercise the warrant by tendering a certain
number of shares of common stock purchased in connection with
the warrant for a number of shares of convertible preferred
stock with an aggregate accreted value at the time of exercise
equal the number of shares of common stock tendered as exercise
consideration multiplied by $19. The accreted value of a share
of convertible preferred stock is subject to increase in the
event of non-payment of preferred stock dividends in cash, in
which event the number of shares of convertible preferred stock
that may be issued upon exercise of the Warrant and tender of
common stock will be reduced.
The warrant may be exercised in whole or in part (through the
tender of whole shares of common stock) commencing on the date
of issue and ending at 5:00 p.m., New York time, on the
earlier of (i) May 15, 2013 and (ii) the first
day in which all outstanding shares of convertible preferred
stock have been fully redeemed or converted (voluntarily or
involuntarily) pursuant to the Certificate of Designations of
the convertible preferred stock. Holders of warrants are
entitled to all notices delivered to holders of convertible
preferred stock and certain other notices as set forth in the
warrant.
Additional
Preferred Stock
Our board of directors may, without any action by holders of the
common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
adopt resolutions to issue preferred stock in one or more
classes or series;
|
|
|
|
fix or change the number of shares constituting any class or
series of preferred stock; and
|
|
|
|
establish or change the rights of the holders of any class or
series of preferred stock.
|
The rights of any class or series of preferred stock may
include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
general or special voting rights;
|
|
|
|
preferential liquidation or preemptive rights;
|
|
|
|
preferential cumulative or noncumulative dividend rights;
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
redemption or put rights; and
|
|
|
|
conversion or exchange rights.
|
We may issue shares of, or rights to purchase, preferred stock
the terms of which might:
|
|
|
|
|
adversely affect voting or other rights evidenced by, or amounts
otherwise payable with respect to, the common stock;
|
|
|
|
discourage an unsolicited proposal to acquire us; or
|
|
|
|
facilitate a particular business combination involving us.
|
Any of these actions could discourage a transaction that some or
a majority of our stockholders might believe to be in their best
interests or in which our stockholders might receive a premium
for their stock over its then market price.
Amended
and Restated Shareholders Agreement
In connection with the closing of the NEG acquisition, we
entered into a Shareholders Agreement with certain of our
stockholders, including Mr. Ward, our Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President, Mr. Mitchell, a director,
and affiliates of AREP. The Shareholders Agreement was
subsequently amended and restated in connection with the sale of
the shares held by AREP to other stockholders (the New
Investors). The Amended and Restated Shareholders
Agreement contains certain restrictions on transfer, tagalong
rights, a selected preemptive right and registration rights,
each of which is described more fully below.
Transfer Restrictions. The Amended and
Restated Shareholders Agreement prohibits the parties from
transferring any of their securities prior to 180 days
following the consummation of a qualified public
offering, other than to family members and affiliates
other than SandRidge or pursuant to the tagalong provisions
described below. However, the Amended and Restated Shareholders
Agreement allows Messrs. Ward and Mitchell to pledge their
shares subject to certain conditions, in connection with a bona
fide loan. The New Investors may also transfer their securities
on the PORTAL market or pursuant to an exemption under the
securities laws. Qualified public offering is
defined as an underwritten, broad based public offering in
excess of $100 million of common stock (which results in
gross proceeds to the sellers of at least $100 million) and
results in not less than 20 million shares of common stock
(including common stock covered by any registration rights
agreement and any shares sold pursuant to any previous public
offerings) being listed for trading on a national securities
exchange (including Nasdaq). We anticipate that our proposed
initial public offering will be a qualified public offering for
the purposes of the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement.
Tag-Along Rights. If Messrs. Ward or
Mitchell propose to sell shares of our common stock (other than
to family members and affiliates other than SandRidge) prior to
a qualified public offering, the New Investors have the right to
elect to sell all of their shares of our common stock on the
same terms. Following a qualified public offering, if
Messrs. Ward or Mitchell propose to sell shares of our
common stock in excess of 3% of our outstanding common stock on
a fully diluted basis (other than to family members and
affiliates other than SandRidge to Rule 144 or in a
registered offering other than a block trade), the New Investors
have the right to elect to sell their proportionate number of
shares of our common stock on the same terms. The tagalong
rights expire on the earlier of (i) the date upon which the
New Investors cease to own at least 20% of our shares of common
stock on purchased from affiliates of AREP and (ii) two
years following a qualified public offering.
Registration Rights. The Amended and Restated
Shareholders Agreement provides each of Mr. Ward,
Mr. Mitchell and the affiliates of AREP certain
registration rights. For a description of these rights, please
read Registration Rights Amended
and Restated Shareholders Agreement.
129
Ares
Shareholder Agreement
In connection with our March 2007 private placement, we entered
into a Shareholders Agreement (the Ares Shareholders
Agreement) with certain affiliates of Ares Management LLC
(Ares) and Mr. Ward. The Ares Shareholder
Agreement contains tag-along rights and a voting requirement,
each of which is described more fully below.
Tag-Along Rights. If Mr. Ward proposes to
sell shares of common stock (other than to family members and
affiliates other than SandRidge), he has agreed to use his
commercially reasonable efforts to structure such sale in a
manner as to allow Ares to sell the same proportionate amount of
its shares on the same terms. To the extent Ares is unable to
sell its proportionate amount of shares as a result of other
tag-along rights, Mr. Ward shall decrease the amount of
shares he is selling to allow for Ares to sell the same
proportionate amount of its shares as Mr. Ward. The
tag-along rights expire two years following the completion of
this offering.
Voting Agreement. We have agreed, upon the
request of Ares, to include its designee for director to be
placed on the ballot for election at our 2008 annual meeting. In
addition, Mr. Ward has agreed to vote his shares in favor
of such designee at our 2008 annual meeting.
Registration
Rights
Amended and Restated Shareholders
Agreement. Pursuant to a Amended and Restated
Shareholders Agreement among us and certain of our stockholders,
including Messrs. Ward and Mitchell and certain of their
respective affiliates, we have agreed to allow such parties to
offer their shares of our common stock in certain future
registered offerings of our common stock, subject to our
priority and customary limitations. We have also agreed to use
our reasonable best efforts to cause a shelf registration
statement to become effective with respect to the securities
held by the stockholders party to the Amended and Restated
Shareholders Agreement upon their request. Such request may not
be made within 120 days of the effectiveness of a
registration statement requested pursuant to the Amended and
Restated Shareholders Agreement or that such stockholders are
entitled to participate in pursuant to the Amended and Restated
Shareholders Agreement. In addition, the stockholders party to
the agreement (other than Messrs. Ward and Mitchell and their
affiliates) may not request that we file a shelf registration
statement prior to the date which is 201 days following the
consummation of our proposed initial public offering. The
stockholders party to the agreement (other than Messrs. Ward and
Mitchell and their affiliates) may transfer their registration
rights under this agreement in connection with sales in excess
of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock. Each of the
parties to the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement have
agreed not to effect any sale or distribution of our common
stock or securities convertible or exchangeable or exercisable
for our common stock for a period of 180 days from the date
of our proposed initial public offering.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions of Delaware Law, Our Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws
Written
Consent of Stockholders
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that any
action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders
must be taken at a duly called meeting of stockholders and not
by written consent.
Amendment
of the Bylaws
Under Delaware law, the power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws
is conferred upon the stockholders. A corporation may, however,
in its certificate of incorporation also confer upon the board
of directors the power to adopt, amend or repeal its bylaws. Our
charter and bylaws grant our board the power to adopt, amend and
repeal our bylaws on the affirmative vote of a majority of the
directors then in office. Our stockholders may adopt, amend or
repeal our bylaws but only at any regular or special meeting of
stockholders by the holders of not less than
662/3%
of the voting power of all outstanding voting stock.
130
Special
Meetings of Stockholders
Our bylaws preclude the ability of our stockholders to call
special meetings of stockholders.
Other
Limitations on Stockholder Actions
Advance notice is required for stockholders to nominate
directors or to submit proposals for consideration at meetings
of stockholders. In addition, the ability of our stockholders to
remove directors without cause is precluded.
Classified
Board
Only one of three classes of directors is elected each year. See
Management Board of Directors.
Limitation
of Liability of Officers and Directors
Our certificate of incorporation provides that no director shall
be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary
damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for
liability as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to us or
our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of laws;
|
|
|
|
for unlawful payment of a dividend or unlawful stock purchase or
stock redemption; and
|
|
|
|
for any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
The effect of these provisions is to eliminate our rights and
our stockholders rights, through stockholders
derivative suits on our behalf, to recover monetary damages
against a director for a breach of fiduciary duty as a director,
including breaches resulting from grossly negligent behavior,
except in the situations described above.
Business
Combination Under Delaware Law
We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law. In general, Section 203
prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in
a business combination with an interested
stockholder for a period of three years after the date of
the transaction in which the person became an interested
stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a
prescribed manner.
Section 203 defines a business combination as a
merger, asset sale or other transaction resulting in a financial
benefit to the interested stockholders. Section 203 defines
an interested stockholder as a person who, together
with affiliates and associates, owns, or, in some cases, within
three years prior, did own, 15% or more of the
corporations voting stock. Under Section 203, a
business combination between us and an interested stockholder is
prohibited unless:
|
|
|
|
|
our board of directors approved either the business combination
or the transaction that resulted in the stockholders becoming an
interested stockholder prior to the date the person attained the
status;
|
|
|
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding
at the time the transaction commenced, excluding, for purposes
of determining the number of shares outstanding, shares owned by
persons who are directors and also officers and issued employee
stock plans, under which employee participants do not have the
right to determine confidentially whether shares held under the
plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
|
|
the business combination is approved by our board of directors
on or subsequent to the date the person became an interested
stockholder and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
the stockholders by the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
131
This provision has an anti-takeover effect with respect to
transactions not approved in advance by our board of directors,
including discouraging takeover attempts that might result in a
premium over the market price for the shares of our common
stock. With approval of our stockholders, we could amend our
certificate of incorporation in the future to elect not to be
governed by the anti-takeover law. This election would become
effective twelve months after the adoption of the amendment and
would not apply to any business combination with any person who
became an interested stockholder on or before the adoption of
the amendment.
132
CERTAIN
U.S. TAX CONSEQUENCES TO
NON-U.S. HOLDERS
The following is a general discussion of the principal
U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences of the
ownership and disposition of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder.
As used in this discussion, the term
non-U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is not, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation or partnership (including any entity treated as a
corporation or partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States, or of any political subdivision of the United
States (unless, in the case of a partnership, U.S. Treasury
Regulations are adopted which provide otherwise);
|
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust, if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary
supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more
United States persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust, or if it has a valid
election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury
Regulations to be treated as a United States person.
|
In any calendar year, an individual may be treated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes as a resident of the
United States by, among other ways, being present in the United
States for at least 31 days in that calendar year and for
an aggregate of at least 183 days during a three-year
period ending in the current calendar year. For purposes of the
183-day
calculation, all of the days on which such individual was
present in the current year, one-third of the days in the
immediately preceding year and one-sixth of the days in the
second preceding year are counted. Residents are taxed for
U.S. federal income tax purposes as if they were
U.S. citizens. This discussion does not consider:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. state or local or
non-U.S. tax
consequences;
|
|
|
|
all aspects of U.S. federal income and estate taxes or
specific facts and circumstances that may be relevant to a
particular
non-U.S. holders
tax position, including, in the case of a
non-U.S. holder
that is an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, the fact that the U.S. tax
consequences of holding and disposing of our common stock may be
affected by certain determinations made at the partner level;
|
|
|
|
the tax consequences for the stockholders, partners or
beneficiaries of a
non-U.S. holder;
|
|
|
|
special tax rules that may apply to particular
non-U.S. holders,
such as financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt
organizations, U.S. expatriates, broker-dealers, and
traders in securities; or
|
|
|
|
special tax rules that may apply to a
non-U.S. holder
that holds our common stock as part of a straddle,
hedge, conversion transaction,
synthetic security or other integrated investment.
|
The following discussion is based on provisions of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), existing and proposed U.S. Treasury
Regulations and administrative and judicial interpretations, all
as of the date of this prospectus, and all of which are subject
to change, retroactively or prospectively. The following summary
assumes that a
non-U.S. holder
holds our common stock as a capital asset. Each
non-U.S. holder
should consult a tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal,
state, local and
non-U.S. income
and other tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing
of shares of our common stock.
Distributions
on Common Stock
We do not expect to pay any cash distributions on our common
stock in the foreseeable future; however, in the event that we
do make such cash distributions, these distributions generally
will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax
purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated
earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal
income tax principles. Any amount paid in excess of such
earnings and profits generally will be treated as a recovery of
tax basis, to the extent thereof, and then gain from sale.
Distributions
133
paid to
non-U.S. holders
of our common stock that are not effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a U.S. trade or business generally will be
subject to U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate, or if a tax
treaty applies, a lower rate specified by the treaty.
A
non-U.S. holder
that claims the benefit of an applicable income tax treaty
generally will be required to provide an Internal Revenue
Service
Form W-8
BEN and meet certain other requirements. However,
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of common stock held by a foreign partnership, the
certification requirement will generally be applied to the
partners of the partnership and the partnership will be required
to provide certain information;
|
|
|
|
in the case of common stock held by a foreign trust, the
certification requirement will generally be applied to the trust
or the beneficial owners of the trust depending on whether the
trust is a foreign complex trust, foreign
simple trust or foreign grantor trust as
defined in the U.S. Treasury Regulations; and
|
|
|
|
look-through rules will apply for tiered partnerships, foreign
simple trusts and foreign grantor trusts.
|
A
non-U.S. holder
that is a foreign partnership or a foreign trust is urged to
consult its own tax advisor regarding its status under these
U.S. Treasury Regulations and the certification
requirements applicable to it.
A
non-U.S. holder
that is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. federal
withholding tax under an income tax treaty may obtain a refund
or credit of any excess amounts withheld by filing an
appropriate claim for refund with the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service.
Non-U.S. holders
should consult their tax advisors regarding their entitlement to
benefits under a relevant income tax treaty.
Dividends that are effectively connected with a
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States and, if an
income tax treaty applies, are attributable to a permanent
establishment in the United States, are taxed on a net income
basis at the regular graduated rates and in the manner
applicable to United States persons. In that case, we will not
withhold U.S. federal withholding tax if the
non-U.S. holder
complies with applicable certification and disclosure
requirements (including providing Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8
ECI). In addition, a branch profits tax may be
imposed at a 30% rate, or a lower rate under an applicable
income tax treaty, on dividends received by a foreign
corporation that are effectively connected with its conduct of a
trade or business in the United States.
Disposition
of Common Stock
We believe that we are a United States real property holding
corporation. Generally, a corporation is a United States real
property holding corporation if the fair market value of its
United States real property interests equals or exceeds 50% of
the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide real property
interests and its other assets used or held for use in a trade
or business. Notwithstanding our status as a United States real
property holding corporation, a
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock generally will not be subject to
U.S. federal income tax on gain recognized on a disposition
of our common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States and, if an
income tax treaty applies, is attributable to a permanent
establishment maintained by the
non-U.S. holder
in the United States; in these cases, the gain will be taxed on
a net income basis at the rates and in the manner applicable to
United States persons, and if the
non-U.S. holder
is a foreign corporation, the branch profits tax described above
may also apply;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of the disposition and
meets other requirements; or
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
actually or constructively owns more than five percent of our
common stock at any time during the shorter of the five-year
period ending on the date of disposition or the period that the
non-U.S. holder
held our common stock, provided that our common stock is
regularly traded on an established securities
market, within the meaning of Section 897 of the Code
and applicable Treasury Regulations, during the calendar year in
which the sale or other disposition occurs.
|
134
Non-United
States holders should consult their own tax advisors with
respect to the application of the foregoing rules.
U.S. Federal
Estate Tax
Common stock owned or treated as owned by an individual who is a
non-U.S. holder
for U.S. federal estate tax purposes at the time of death
will be included in the individuals gross estate for
U.S. federal estate tax purposes, unless an applicable
estate tax or other treaty provides otherwise, and therefore may
be subject to U.S. federal estate tax.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax
Generally, we must report annually to any
non-U.S. holder
and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service the amount of any
dividends paid to such holder, the holders name and
address, and the amount, if any, of tax withheld. Copies of the
information returns reporting those dividends and amounts
withheld also may be made available to the tax authorities in
the country in which the
non-U.S. holder
resides under the provisions of any applicable tax treaty or
exchange of information agreement.
In addition to information reporting requirements, dividends
paid to a
non-U.S. holder
may be subject to U.S. backup withholding tax. A
non-U.S. holder
generally will be exempt from this backup withholding tax,
however, if such holder properly provides a
Form W-8BEN
certifying that such holder is a
non-United
States person or otherwise establishes an exemption and we do
not know or have reason to know that the holder is a United
States person.
The gross proceeds from the disposition of our common stock may
be subject to information reporting and backup withholding. If a
non-U.S. holder
sells shares of our common stock outside the United States
through a
non-U.S. office
of a
non-U.S. broker
and the sales proceeds are paid to such holder outside the
United States, then the U.S. backup withholding and
information reporting requirements generally will not apply to
that payment. However, U.S. information reporting, but not
backup withholding, generally will apply to a payment of sales
proceeds, even if that payment is made outside the United
States, if the
non-U.S. holder
sells shares of our common stock through a
non-U.S. office
of a broker that:
|
|
|
|
|
is a United States person;
|
|
|
|
derives 50% or more of its gross income in specific periods from
the conduct of a trade or business in the United States;
|
|
|
|
is a controlled foreign corporation for
U.S. federal tax purposes; or
|
|
|
|
is a foreign partnership, if at any time during its tax year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
one or more of its partners are United States persons who in the
aggregate hold more than 50% of the income or capital interests
in the partnership; or
|
|
|
|
the foreign partnership is engaged in a U.S. trade or
business,
|
unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that the
holder is not a U.S. person and certain other conditions
are met, or the holder otherwise establishes an exemption.
If a
non-U.S. holder
receives payments of the proceeds of a sale of our common stock
to or through a U.S. office of a broker, the payment will
be subject to both U.S. backup withholding and information
reporting unless such holder properly provides a
Form W-8BEN
certifying that such holder is not a United States person or
otherwise establishes an exemption, and we do not know or have
reason to know that such holder is a United States person.
A
non-U.S. holder
generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the
backup withholding rules that exceed such holders
U.S. federal income tax liability by timely filing a
properly completed claim for refund with the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service.
135
The validity of the shares offered hereby will be passed upon
for us by Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
The financial statements of SandRidge Energy, Inc. as of
December 31, 2005 and 2006 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2006 included in this
prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
The combined financial statements of NEG Oil & Gas LLC
and subsidiaries, excluding National Energy Group, Inc. and the
103/4% Senior
Notes due from National Energy Group Inc., but including
National Energy Group Inc.s 50% membership interest in NEG
Holding LLC as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005
included in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration
statement have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, as indicated in their report
with respect thereto, and is included herein in reliance upon
the authority of said firm as experts in giving said report.
The estimated reserve evaluations and related calculations for
our WTO properties as of December 31, 2005 and PetroSource
properties as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and
June 30, 2007 have been included in this prospectus in
reliance upon the report of DeGolyer and MacNaughton,
independent petroleum engineering consultants, given upon their
authority as experts in petroleum engineering. The estimated
reserve evaluations and related calculations for our Piceance
Basin properties as of December 31, 2005 and our WTO, East
Texas, Gulf of Mexico, Gulf Coast and certain other properties
as of December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2007 have been
included in this prospectus in reliance upon the report of
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent
petroleum engineering consultants, given upon their authority as
experts in petroleum engineering. The estimated reserve
evaluations for certain of our other properties as of
December 31, 2005 have been included in this report in
reliance upon the report of Harper & Associates, Inc.,
independent petroleum engineering consultants, given upon their
authority as experts in petroleum engineering.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock being
sold in this offering. This prospectus, which forms part of the
registration statement, does not contain all of the information
set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and
schedules to the registration statement. For further information
with respect to us and our common stock being sold in this
offering, we refer you to the registration statement and the
exhibits and schedules filed as a part of the registration
statement. Statements contained in this prospectus concerning
the contents of any contract or any other document are not
necessarily complete. If a contract or document has been filed
as an exhibit to the registration statement, we refer you to the
copy of the contract or document that has been filed as an
exhibit and is qualified in all respects by the filed exhibit.
The registration statement, including exhibits and schedules
filed, may be inspected without charge at the Public Reference
Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies of all or any part of it
may be obtained from that office after payment of fees
prescribed by the SEC. Information on the operation of the
Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and
information statements and other information regarding
registrants that file electronically with the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
The other information we file with the SEC is not part of the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. These filings are available
on our website at
http://www.sandridgeenergy.com.
Information on, or accessible through, this website is not a
part of, and is not incorporated into, this prospectus. In
addition, we will provide copies of our filings free of charge
to our stockholders upon request.
136
|
|
|
|
|
SandRidge Energy, Inc. Audited Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
SandRidge Energy, Inc. Unaudited Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
|
|
NEG Oil & Gas LLC Audited Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
|
|
|
|
|
F-63
|
|
|
|
|
F-64
|
|
|
|
|
F-65
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
|
|
NEG Oil & Gas LLC Unaudited Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-92
|
|
|
|
|
F-93
|
|
|
|
|
F-94
|
|
|
|
|
F-95
|
|
|
|
|
F-96
|
|
F-1
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors
and Stockholders of SandRidge Energy, Inc.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders equity and of cash flows present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and
2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the
Company changed the manner in which it accounts for oil and gas
operations from the successful efforts method to the full cost
method in 2006, and accordingly, the financial statements have
been retroactively restated. Also, as discussed in Note 1,
the 2006 consolidated financial statements have been restated to
correct the fair value of derivative contracts.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
March 30, 2007, except for Restatement section of
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, as to
which the date is May 11, 2007.
F-2
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amount)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
45,731
|
|
|
$
|
38,948
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
59,180
|
|
|
|
89,774
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
5,376
|
|
|
|
5,731
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
2,544
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
6,315
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
31,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
118,833
|
|
|
|
174,806
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties, using full cost method of
accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
160,789
|
|
|
|
1,636,832
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
33,974
|
|
|
|
282,374
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
(35,029
|
)
|
|
|
(60,752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,734
|
|
|
|
1,858,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
178,147
|
|
|
|
276,264
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,198
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
3,584
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,189
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
15,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
458,683
|
|
|
$
|
2,388,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
12,997
|
|
|
$
|
26,201
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
95,435
|
|
|
|
129,799
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
110,642
|
|
|
|
158,792
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
30,136
|
|
|
|
1,040,630
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,219
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
6,979
|
|
|
|
45,216
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
13,747
|
|
|
|
24,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
161,504
|
|
|
|
1,293,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
8,177
|
|
|
|
5,092
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value,
2,650 shares authorized, 2,137 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,643
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par; 50,000 shares authorized; no
shares issued and outstanding in 2005 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 400,000 shares
authorized; 74,332 issued and 72,917 outstanding at 2005 and
93,048 issued and 91,604 outstanding at 2006
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
243,920
|
|
|
|
574,868
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(14,885
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(17,335
|
)
|
|
|
(17,835
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
77,229
|
|
|
|
92,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
289,002
|
|
|
|
649,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
458,683
|
|
|
$
|
2,388,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas and crude oil
|
|
$
|
33,685
|
|
|
$
|
49,987
|
|
|
$
|
101,252
|
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
39,417
|
|
|
|
80,343
|
|
|
|
139,049
|
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
98,906
|
|
|
|
147,133
|
|
|
|
122,896
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,987
|
|
|
|
10,230
|
|
|
|
25,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
175,995
|
|
|
|
287,693
|
|
|
|
388,242
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
10,230
|
|
|
|
16,195
|
|
|
|
35,149
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
26,442
|
|
|
|
52,122
|
|
|
|
98,436
|
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
96,180
|
|
|
|
141,372
|
|
|
|
115,076
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization natural gas
and crude oil
|
|
|
4,909
|
|
|
|
9,313
|
|
|
|
26,321
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization other
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
29,305
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,554
|
|
|
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
55,634
|
|
Loss (gain) on derivative contracts
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
(12,291
|
)
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
155,245
|
|
|
|
253,640
|
|
|
|
351,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
20,750
|
|
|
|
34,053
|
|
|
|
36,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
|
(5,277
|
)
|
|
|
(16,904
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
Income (loss) from equity investments
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(1,920
|
)
|
|
|
(6,192
|
)
|
|
|
(15,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
18,830
|
|
|
|
27,861
|
|
|
|
21,857
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
9,968
|
|
|
|
6,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
12,397
|
|
|
|
17,893
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
Income from discontinued operations (net of tax expense of $232
and $118 in 2004 and 2005, respectively)
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary gain
|
|
|
12,848
|
|
|
|
18,122
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
Extraordinary gain on Foreland acquisition
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
25,392
|
|
|
|
18,122
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
25,392
|
|
|
$
|
18,122
|
|
|
$
|
11,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain on Foreland acquisition
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income per share available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,559
|
|
|
|
73,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,737
|
|
|
|
74,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Restated for 2004, 2005 and 2006)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2004 (previously reported)
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,628
|
|
|
$
|
27,851
|
|
Prior period adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,090
|
|
|
|
6,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2004 (restated)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,718
|
|
|
|
33,941
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,392
|
|
|
|
25,392
|
|
Dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,108
|
|
|
|
59,331
|
|
Exchange of preferred stock for common stock
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,335
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,340
|
)
|
Stock split (change in par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock in acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
55,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,285
|
|
Stock offering, net of $18.0 million in offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
173,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,122
|
|
Restricted shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15,366
|
|
|
|
(15,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,122
|
|
|
|
18,122
|
|
Dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
243,920
|
|
|
|
(14,885
|
)
|
|
|
(17,335
|
)
|
|
|
77,229
|
|
|
|
289,002
|
|
Stock offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
Change in accounting principle for stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,885
|
)
|
|
|
14,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock in acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
236,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,284
|
|
Stock offering, net of $3.9 million in offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
97,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,433
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,792
|
|
Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
574,868
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17,835
|
)
|
|
$
|
92,693
|
|
|
$
|
649,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
25,392
|
|
|
$
|
18,122
|
|
|
$
|
15,621
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
24,941
|
|
|
|
17,893
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
12,674
|
|
|
|
24,206
|
|
|
|
55,626
|
|
Debt issuance cost amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
9,460
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
Extraordinary gain
|
|
|
(12,544
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives
|
|
|
(1,803
|
)
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
Interest income restricted deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
Loss (gain) from equity investments, net of distributions
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
(956
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
8,792
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities increasing
(decreasing) cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(6,950
|
)
|
|
|
(25,494
|
)
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(938
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
(22,238
|
)
|
Other assets and liabilities, net
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
(2,131
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
33,709
|
|
|
|
12,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities by continuing
operations
|
|
|
38,458
|
|
|
|
63,297
|
|
|
|
67,349
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities by discontinued
operations
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
39,436
|
|
|
|
63,644
|
|
|
|
67,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(57,926
|
)
|
|
|
(134,596
|
)
|
|
|
(306,541
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
3,327
|
|
|
|
19,742
|
|
Contributions on equity investments
|
|
|
(1,976
|
)
|
|
|
(1,350
|
)
|
|
|
(3,388
|
)
|
Acquisitions of assets, net of cash received of $0, $66 and
$21,100
|
|
|
(1,169
|
)
|
|
|
(21,247
|
)
|
|
|
(1,054,075
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,051
|
)
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,373
|
)
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities for continuing operations
|
|
|
(59,408
|
)
|
|
|
(155,826
|
)
|
|
|
(1,340,567
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities for discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,931
|
)
|
|
|
(1,473
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(61,339
|
)
|
|
|
(157,299
|
)
|
|
|
(1,340,567
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
41,620
|
|
|
|
247,460
|
|
|
|
1,261,910
|
|
Repayments of borrowings
|
|
|
(6,840
|
)
|
|
|
(301,285
|
)
|
|
|
(518,870
|
)
|
Dividends paid-preferred
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests contributions (distributions)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
7,117
|
|
|
|
(618
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,122
|
|
|
|
100,776
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,486
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities for continuing
operations
|
|
|
34,700
|
|
|
|
126,413
|
|
|
|
1,266,435
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities for discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
34,700
|
|
|
|
126,413
|
|
|
|
1,266,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
12,797
|
|
|
|
32,758
|
|
|
|
(6,783
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
12,973
|
|
|
|
45,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year
|
|
$
|
12,973
|
|
|
$
|
45,731
|
|
|
$
|
38,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$
|
2,024
|
|
|
$
|
7,222
|
|
|
$
|
15,079
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued in connection with acquisitions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,285
|
|
|
$
|
236,284
|
|
Assumption of restricted deposits and notes payable in
connection with acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313,628
|
|
Assets disposed in exchange for common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium financed
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
5,023
|
|
Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated)
|
|
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Nature of Business. SandRidge Energy, Inc. and
its subsidiaries (formerly known as Riata Energy Inc.)
(collectively, the Company or SandRidge)
is an oil and gas company with its principal focus on
exploration, development and production related to oil and gas
activities. SandRidge also owns and operates drilling rigs and
provides related oil field services, midstream gas services
operations, and
CO2
and tertiary oil recovery operations. SandRidges primary
exploration, development and production areas are concentrated
in West Texas. The Company also operates significant interests
in the Cotton Valley Trend in East Texas and Gulf Coast area.
On November 21, 2006, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding membership interests of NEG Oil & Gas LLC
(NEG) (See Note 3).
Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of SandRidge Energy,
Inc. and its wholly owned or majority owned subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications
have been made in prior period financial statements to conform
with current period presentation.
Restatement. The Company has restated the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The restatement relates to the loss
(gain) on derivative contracts in the statement of operations.
In 2006, the Company recognized an unrealized gain on change in
fair value of derivatives related to mark-to-market adjustments
of derivative contracts with a counterparty for approximately
$3.0 million. The Company recently discovered that the
mark-to-market adjustments booked in 2006 for the derivative
contracts with this counterparty were recorded incorrectly. As
part of its normal closing procedures, the Company requests from
the counterparty the Companys mark-to-market position.
Historically, the Companys counterparties have sent the
statement in terms of SandRidges position. During the
fourth quarter of 2006, the Company entered into derivative
contracts with a new counterparty. The new counterparty
confirmed to the Company the mark-to-market loss (gain) in their
position, not the Companys. The position terms of the
statement were not specified on the report and recorded in error
during the 2006 year end closing process. As part of the
first quarter 2007 closing process, the Company discovered the
error.
F-7
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
The restatement affects Note 12 Derivatives,
Note 14 Income Taxes, and
Note 21 Industry Segment Information. The
restatement had no effect on the Companys previously
presented net cash provided by (used in) operating activities,
investing activities, or financing activities for any period
presented. A comparison of the Companys previously
presented deferred tax assets, derivative contracts
current assets, derivative contracts non current
assets, derivative contracts current liabilities,
derivative contracts non current liabilities,
deferred tax liabilities, and retained earnings to its restated
financial position disclosed herein are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(As originally
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
|
presented)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
5,244
|
|
|
$
|
6,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts current assets
|
|
$
|
279
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts non current assets
|
|
$
|
1,736
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts current liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts non current liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
26,020
|
|
|
$
|
24,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
$
|
96,549
|
|
|
$
|
92,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A comparison of the Companys previously presented net
income, income available to common stockholders, and earnings
per share to its results of operations disclosed herein are as
follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(As originally
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
|
presented)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
19,477
|
|
|
$
|
15,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
15,510
|
|
|
$
|
11,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Method of Accounting for Oil and Gas
Operations. In the fourth quarter of 2006, the
Company changed from the successful efforts method to the full
cost method of accounting for its oil and gas operations. All
prior years financial statements presented herein have
been restated to reflect the change.
Management believes that the full cost method is preferable for
a company more actively involved in the exploration and
development of oil and gas reserves. The full cost method was
also utilized by NEG prior to the acquisition, and the assets
acquired from NEG constitute more than SandRidges total
oil and gas assets.
SandRidges financial results have been retroactively
restated to reflect the conversion to the full cost method. As
prescribed by full cost accounting rules, all costs associated
with property acquisition, exploration, and development
activities are capitalized. Exploration and development costs
include dry hole costs, geological and geophysical costs, direct
overhead related to exploration and development activities and
other costs incurred for the purpose of finding oil and gas
reserves.
In accordance with full cost accounting rules, SandRidge is
subject to a limitation on capitalized costs. The capitalized
cost of oil and gas properties, net of accumulated depreciation,
depletion, and amortization, may not exceed the estimated future
net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves discounted at
10%, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved
properties as adjusted for related tax effects. If capitalized
F-8
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
costs exceed this limit (the ceiling limitation),
the excess must be charged to expense. SandRidge did not have
any adjustment to earnings due to the ceiling limitation for the
periods presented herein.
A comparison of the Companys previously presented
property, plant and equipment, net, deferred income taxes and
retained earnings under the successful efforts method of
accounting to its financial position disclosed herein are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(As originally
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
|
presented)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
318,284
|
|
|
$
|
337,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
6,857
|
|
|
$
|
13,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
$
|
64,522
|
|
|
$
|
77,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A comparison of the Companys previously presented income
from continuing operations, net income, and earnings per share
under the successful efforts method of accounting to its results
of operations disclosed herein are as follows (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, as originally presented
|
|
$
|
8,327
|
|
|
$
|
15,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as originally presented
|
|
$
|
21,322
|
|
|
$
|
15,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share, as originally presented
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, as restated
|
|
$
|
12,397
|
|
|
$
|
17,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as restated
|
|
$
|
25,392
|
|
|
$
|
18,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share, as restated
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of Estimates. The preparation of the
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Estimates of oil and natural gas reserves and their values,
future production rates and future costs and expenses are
inherently uncertain for numerous reasons, including many
factors beyond the Companys control. Reservoir engineering
is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations
of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact
manner. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of
the quality of data available and of engineering and geological
interpretation and judgment. In addition, estimates of reserves
may be revised based on actual production, results of subsequent
exploitation and development activities, prevailing commodity
prices, operating cost and other factors. These revisions may be
material and could materially affect the Companys future
depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses.
The Companys revenue, profitability, and future growth are
substantially dependent upon the prevailing and future prices
for oil and natural gas, which are dependent upon numerous
factors beyond its control such as economic, regulatory
developments and competition from other energy sources. The
energy markets have historically been volatile and there can be
no assurance that oil and natural gas prices will not be subject
to wide fluctuations in the future. A substantial or extended
decline in oil and natural gas prices could have a
F-9
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
material adverse effect on the Companys financial
position, results of operations, cash flows and quantities of
oil and natural gas reserves that may be economically produced.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company
considers all highly-liquid instruments with a maturity of three
months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Those
securities are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and
bear insignificant risk of changes in value due to their short
maturity period.
Restricted Cash. Restricted cash of
approximately $2.4 million at December 31, 2005 was
pledged as collateral on certain bank debt and is classified as
restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets. The
restriction was released in April 2006.
Accounts Receivable, net. The Company has
receivables for sales of oil, gas and natural gas liquids, as
well as receivables related to the exploration and extraction
services for oil, gas and natural gas liquids. Management has
established an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance is
evaluated by management and is based on managements
periodic review of the collectibility of the receivables in
light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the
receivables, and other subjective factors.
Inventories. Inventories consist of oil field
services supplies and are stated at the lower of cost or market
with cost determined on an average cost basis.
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the amount by
which the total purchase price SandRidge has paid to acquire
businesses accounted for as purchases exceeds the estimated fair
value of the net assets acquired. The Company tests goodwill for
impairment annually and charges income for any impairment
recognized, but goodwill is not otherwise amortized.
Debt Issue Costs. The Company amortizes debt
issue costs related to its senior credit facility and senior
bridge facility as interest expense over the scheduled maturity
period of the debt. Unamortized debt issuance costs were $0 as
of December 31, 2005 and approximately $15.5 million
as of December 31, 2006. The Company includes those
unamortized costs in other assets.
Revenue Recognition and Gas Balancing. Oil and
natural gas revenues are recorded when title passes to the
customer, net of royalties, discounts and allowances, as
applicable. The Company accounts for oil and natural gas
production imbalances using the sales method, whereby the
Company recognizes revenue on all oil and natural gas sold to
its customers notwithstanding the fact that its ownership may be
less than 100% of the oil and natural gas sold. Liabilities are
recorded by the Company for imbalances greater than the
Companys proportionate share of remaining estimated oil
and natural gas reserves. The Company did not have significant
gas imbalance positions at December 31, 2005. The Company
has recorded a liability for gas imbalance positions related to
gas properties with insufficient proved reserves of
$0.9 million at December 31, 2006. The Company
includes the gas imbalance positions in other long-term
obligations.
The Company recognizes revenues and expenses generated from
daywork drilling contracts as the services are
performed, since the Company does not bear the risk of
completion of the well. Under footage and
turnkey contracts, the Company bears the risk of
completion of the well; therefore, revenues and expenses are
recognized when the well is substantially completed. Under this
method, substantial completion is determined when the well bore
reaches the negotiated depth as stated in the contract. The
duration of all three types of contracts range typically from 20
to 90 days. The entire amount of a loss, if any, is
recorded when the loss is determinable. The costs of uncompleted
drilling contracts include expenses incurred to date on
footage or turnkey contracts, which are
still in process at the end of the period.
The Company may receive lump-sum fees for the mobilization of
equipment and personnel. Mobilization fees received and costs
incurred to mobilize a rig from one market to another are
recognized over the term of the related drilling contract. The
contract terms are typically from 20 to 90 days.
F-10
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
Revenues from the midstream gas services segment are derived
from providing supply, transportation, balancing and sales
services for producers and wholesale customers on natural gas
pipelines, as well as other interconnected pipeline systems.
Midstream gas services are primarily undertaken to realize
incremental margins on gas purchased at the wellhead, and
provide value-added services to customers. In general, natural
gas purchased and sold by the midstream gas business is priced
at a published daily or monthly index price. Sales to wholesale
customers typically incorporate a premium for managing their
transmission and balancing requirements. Revenues are recognized
upon delivery of natural gas to customers
and/or when
services are rendered, pricing is determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured.
Revenue from sales of
CO2
is recognized when the product is delivered to the customer. The
Company recognizes service fees related to the transportation of
CO2
as revenue when the related service is provided.
Environmental Costs. Environmental
expenditures are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate,
depending on their future economic benefit. Expenditures that
relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and
that do not have future economic benefit, are expensed.
Liabilities related to future costs are recorded on an
undiscounted basis when environmental assessments
and/or
remediation activities are probable and costs can be reasonably
estimated. Environmental costs accrued at December 31, 2005
and 2006 were not material.
Oil and Natural Gas Operations. The Company
uses the full cost method to account for its natural gas and oil
properties. Under full cost accounting, all costs directly
associated with the acquisition, exploration and development of
natural gas and oil reserves are capitalized into a full
cost pool. These capitalized costs include costs of all
unproved properties, internal costs directly related to the
Companys acquisition, exploration and development
activities and capitalized interest. These costs are amortized
using a unit-of-production method. Under this method, the
provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization is
computed at the end of each quarter by multiplying total
production for such quarter by a depletion rate. The depletion
rate is determined by dividing the total unamortized cost base
by net equivalent proved reserves at the beginning of the
quarter.
Costs associated with unproved properties are excluded from the
total unamortized cost base until a determination has been made
as to the existence of proved reserves. Unproved properties are
reviewed at the end of each quarter to determine whether the
costs incurred should be reclassified to the full cost pool and,
thereby, subject to amortization. Sales and abandonments of
natural gas and oil properties being amortized are accounted for
as adjustments to the full cost pool, with no gain or loss
recognized, unless the adjustments would significantly alter the
relationship between capitalized costs and proved natural gas
and oil reserves. A significant alteration would not ordinarily
be expected to occur upon the sale of reserves involving less
than 25% of the reserve quantities of a cost center.
Under full cost accounting, total capitalized costs (net of
accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization) less
related deferred taxes may not exceed an amount equal to the
present value of future net revenues from proved reserves,
discounted at 10% per annum, plus the lower of cost or fair
value of unevaluated properties, plus estimated salvage value,
less income tax effects (the ceiling limitation). A
ceiling limitation calculation is performed at the end of each
quarter. If total capitalized costs (net of accumulated
depreciation, depletion and amortization) less related deferred
taxes are greater than the ceiling limitation, a write-down or
impairment of the full cost pool is required. A write-down of
the carrying value of the full cost pool is a non-cash charge
that reduces earnings and impacts stockholders equity in
the period of occurrence and typically results in lower
depreciation, depletion and amortization expense in future
periods. Once incurred, a write-down is not reversible at a
later date.
The ceiling test is calculated using natural gas and oil prices
in effect as of the balance sheet date, as adjusted for
basis or location differentials as of the balance
sheet date and held constant over the life of the reserves
(net wellhead prices). If applicable, these net
wellhead prices would be further adjusted to include the effects
of any fixed price arrangements for the sale of natural gas and
oil. The Company may, from time-
F-11
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
to-time, use derivative financial instruments to hedge against
the volatility of natural gas prices. Derivative contracts that
qualify and are designated as cash flow hedges and, are included
in estimated future cash flows. Historically, the Company has
not designated any of its derivative contracts as cash flow
hedges. In addition, the future cash outflows associated with
future development wells are included in the computation of the
discounted present value of future net revenues for the purposes
of the ceiling test calculation.
The costs associated with unproved properties are not initially
included in the amortization base and relate to unproved
leasehold acreage, wells and production facilities in progress
and wells pending determination of the existence of proved
reserves, together with capitalized interest costs for these
projects. Unproved leasehold costs are transferred to the
amortization base with the costs of drilling the related well
once a determination of the existence of proved reserves has
been made or upon impairment of a lease. Costs of seismic data
are allocated to various unproved leaseholds and transferred to
the amortization base with the associated leasehold costs on a
specific project basis. Costs associated with wells in progress
and completed wells that have yet to be evaluated are
transferred to the amortization base once a determination is
made whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the
property. Costs of dry holes are transferred to the amortization
base immediately upon determination that the well is
unsuccessful. The Company capitalized exploration expense of
$3.7 million in 2004, $2.1 million in 2005 and
$13.7 million in 2006.
All items classified as unproved property are assessed on a
quarterly basis for possible impairment or reduction in value.
Properties are assessed on an individual basis or as a group if
properties are individually insignificant. The assessment
includes consideration of the following factors, among others:
intent to drill; remaining lease term; geological and
geophysical evaluations; drilling results and activity; the
assignment of proved reserves; and the economic viability of
development if proved reserves are assigned. During any period
in which these factors indicate an impairment, the cumulative
drilling costs incurred to date for such property and all or a
portion of the associated leasehold costs are transferred to the
full cost pool and are then subject to amortization.
Property, Plant and Equipment, net. Other
capitalized costs, including drilling equipment, natural gas
gathering and processing equipment, transportation equipment and
other property and equipment are carried at cost. Renewals and
improvements are capitalized while repairs and maintenance are
expensed. Depreciation of drilling equipment is recorded using
the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives.
Depreciation of other property and equipment is computed using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets ranging from 3 to 39 years.
Realization of the carrying value of property and equipment is
reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Assets are determined to be impaired if a forecast
of undiscounted estimated future net operating cash flows
directly related to the asset including disposal value if any,
is less than the carrying amount of the asset. If any asset is
determined to be impaired, the loss is measured as the amount by
which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.
An estimate of fair value is based on the best information
available, including prices for similar assets. Changes in such
estimates could cause the Company to reduce the carrying value
of property and equipment.
When property and equipment components are disposed of, the cost
and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the
accounts and any resulting gain or loss is generally reflected
in operations.
Investments. Investments in affiliated
companies are accounted for under the cost or equity method,
based on the Companys ability to exercise significant
influence.
Asset Retirement Obligation. The Company owns
oil and natural gas properties which require expenditures to
plug and abandon the wells when the oil and natural gas reserves
in the wells are depleted. These expenditures are recorded in
the period in which the liability is incurred (at the time the
wells are drilled or acquired). Asset retirement obligations are
recorded as a liability at their estimated present value at the
assets
F-12
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
inception, with the offsetting charge to property cost. Periodic
accretion expense of the estimated liability is recorded in the
statement of operations.
The asset retirement obligations primarily represent the
Companys estimate of fair value to plug, abandon and
remediate the oil and natural gas properties at the end of their
productive lives, in accordance with applicable state laws. The
Company has determined the asset retirement obligations by
calculating the present value of estimated expenses related to
the liability. Estimating the future asset retirement
obligations requires management to make estimates and judgments
regarding timing, existence of a liability, and what constitutes
adequate restoration. Inherent in the present value calculation
rates, are the timing of settlement, and changes in the legal,
regulatory, environmental and political environments. To the
extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the present
value of the existing asset retirement obligations liability, a
corresponding adjustment is made to the related asset. The
following is a reconciliation of the asset retirement obligation
for the years ended December 31, (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation, January 1
|
|
$
|
3,883
|
|
|
$
|
4,394
|
|
|
$
|
6,979
|
|
Liability incurred upon acquiring and drilling wells
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
NEG acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,343
|
|
Revisions in estimated cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,700
|
)
|
Liability settled in current period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of discount expense
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation, December 31
|
|
$
|
4,394
|
|
|
$
|
6,979
|
|
|
$
|
45,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are
provided on temporary differences between financial statement
and income tax reporting. Temporary differences are differences
between the amounts of assets and liabilities reported for
financial statement purposes and their tax bases. Deferred tax
assets are recognized for temporary differences that will be
deductible in future years tax returns and for operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance if it is deemed more likely
than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for temporary
differences that will be taxable in future years tax
returns.
Minority Interest. As of December 31,
2006, minority interest in the Companys consolidated
subsidiaries consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the 15.00% interest in Integra Energy;
|
|
|
|
the 30.38% interest in Sagebrush Pipeline; and
|
|
|
|
the 46.71% interest in Cholla Pipeline.
|
Concentration of Risk. The Company maintains
cash balances at several banks. Accounts at each institution are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to
$100,000. From time to time, the Company may have balances in
these accounts that exceed the federally insured limit. The
Company does not anticipate any loss associated with balances in
excess of the federally insured limit.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. For
certain of the Companys financial instruments, including
cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the carrying
value approximates fair value because of their short maturity.
The carrying value of borrowings under the senior credit
facility and the notes payable approximates fair value because
their interest rates are based on fair value indexes. The fair
value of the Companys senior bridge facility and
convertible preferred stock approximate book value based on
current material transactions completed by the Company
subsequent to year end.
F-13
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
Derivative Financial Instruments. To manage
risks related to increases in interest rates and changes in oil
and gas prices, the Company occasionally enters into interest
rate swaps and oil and gas futures contracts.
The Company recognizes all of its derivative instruments as
either assets or liabilities at fair value. The accounting for
changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a
derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated
and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, and further, on
the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative
instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging
instruments, the Company designates the hedging instrument,
based on the exposure being hedged, as either a fair value hedge
or a cash flow hedge. For derivative instruments not designated
as hedging instruments, the gain or loss is recognized in
current earnings during the period of change. None of the
Companys derivatives were designated as hedging
instruments during 2004, 2005 and 2006.
Stock-Based Compensation. Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123-R,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
SFAS 123R establishes the accounting for equity instruments
exchanged for employee services. Under SFAS 123R,
share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date
based on the calculated fair value of the award. The expense is
recognized over the employees requisite service period,
generally the vesting period of the award. SFAS 123R also
requires the related excess tax benefit received upon exercise
of stock options or vesting of restricted stock, if any, to be
reflected in the statement of cash flows as a financing activity
rather than an operating activity. The Company does not have any
excess tax benefits.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, or FIN 48, which is
effective for the Company as of the interim reporting period
beginning January 1, 2007. The validity of any tax position
is a matter of tax law, and generally there is no controversy
about recognizing the benefit of a tax position in a
companys financial statements when the degree of
confidence is high that the tax position will be sustained upon
examination by a taxing authority. The tax law is subject to
varied interpretation, and whether a tax position will
ultimately be sustained may be uncertain. Under FIN 48, the
impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax
provision must be recognized at the largest amount that is more
likely than not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant
taxing authority. A benefit based on an uncertain income tax
position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50%
likelihood of being sustained. FIN 48 also requires
additional disclosures about unrecognized tax benefits
associated with uncertain income tax positions and a
reconciliation of the change in the unrecognized benefit. In
addition, FIN 48 requires interest to be recognized on the
full amount of deferred benefits for uncertain tax positions. An
income tax penalty is recognized as expense when the tax
position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid
the imposition of a penalty. The Company continues to evaluate
the impact of FIN 48 on the consolidated financial
statements. At this time, the Company is evaluating the impact
of FIN 48.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which establishes a formal
framework for measuring fair values of assets and liabilities in
financial statements that are already required by U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be measured
at fair value. SFAS No. 157 clarifies guidance in FASB
Concepts Statement (CON) No. 7 which discusses
present value techniques in measuring fair value. Additional
disclosures are also required for transactions measured at fair
value. No new fair value measurements are prescribed, and
SFAS No. 157 is intended to codify the several
definitions of fair value included in various accounting
standards. However, the application of this Statement may change
current practices for certain companies. SFAS No. 157
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting
SFAS No. 157 on the financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option For Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS No. 159), which
permits an entity to choose to measure certain financial assets
and liabilities at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also revises
provisions of SFAS No. 115 that apply to
available-for-sale and trading securities. This statement is
F-14
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. The Company has not yet evaluated the potential impact of
this standard.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, the Company performs an annual
impairment test (or more frequently if impairment indicators
arise) for goodwill and other intangibles with indefinite lives.
The Company allocates goodwill to various reporting units to
perform its impairment test. SFAS No. 142 requires
that the implied fair value of the reporting unit be compared
with its carrying amount on an annual basis to determine if
there is a potential impairment. If the fair value of the
reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the Company
would record an impairment loss to the extent of that
difference. The Company bases the fair values of its reporting
units on a combination of valuation approaches, including
discounted cash flows, multiples of sales and earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization and
comparisons of recent transactions. In the fourth quarter of
2006, the Company conducted its annual valuation test and
determined it was not required to recognize any goodwill
impairment. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had no
intangible assets and goodwill. As of December 31, 2006,
the Company had no intangible assets.
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for 2006 was as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
26,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
26,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Acquisitions
and Dispositions
|
2005
Acquisitions
The Company closed the following acquisitions in 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of additional equity interests in PetroSource,
which increased the Companys ownership from 22.4% to
86.5%, resulting in the consolidation of PetroSource in the
Companys financial statements;
|
|
|
|
The acquisition from an executive officer and director of the
remaining 50% equity interest in the Companys compression
services subsidiary, Larco, resulting in it becoming a
wholly-owned subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
The acquisition from an executive officer and director of
approximately 7,400 net acres of additional leasehold
interest in West Texas in properties in which the Company
previously held interests;
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of approximately 2,503 net acres of
additional leasehold interest in property in the Piceance Basin
in which the Company previously held interests;
|
|
|
|
The acquisition from a director of additional working interests
in Missouri and Nevada leases in which the Company previously
held interests;
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of an additional 19.5% before pay-out interest
in the Companys subsidiary, Sagebrush Pipeline LLC; and
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of certain interests in several oil and natural
gas properties in West Texas from Carl E. Gungoll Exploration,
LLC and certain other parties. The purchase price was
approximately $8.0 million, comprised of $5.4 million
in cash, and 174,833 shares of common stock (valued at
$2.6 million).
|
F-15
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
The acquisitions were financed with approximately
$21.3 million in cash and the issuance of
3,685,690 shares of common stock with an aggregate value of
approximately $55.3 million. Details are set forth below
for each of the acquisition transactions (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration Paid
|
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Cash, Net
|
|
|
|
Plant &
|
|
|
Addition to Net
|
|
|
Elimination of
|
|
|
Minority
|
|
|
Stock No.
|
|
|
Stock at
|
|
|
of Cash
|
|
Acquisition Transaction
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
Assets(1)
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
$15/Share
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
PetroSource additional interests
|
|
$
|
73,744
|
|
|
$
|
(37,381
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,052
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
$
|
14,372
|
|
|
$
|
15,686
|
|
Piceance Basin additional interests
|
|
|
17,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
17,456
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
West Texas additional lease interests
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larco remaining interest
|
|
|
5,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,446
|
)
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gungoll lease interests
|
|
|
8,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
Various additional lease interests
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sagebrush additional interests
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,378
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
3,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
115,394
|
|
|
$
|
(37,381
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,052
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
$
|
55,285
|
|
|
$
|
21,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The purchase price for additional interests in PetroSource was
approximately $30.1 million, comprised of
$15.7 million in cash (net of $0.1 million in cash
acquired), and approximately 958,000 shares of SandRidge
common stock (valued at $14.4 million). The purchase price
has been allocated to accounts receivable of $4.5 million,
other current assets of $0.1 million, other assets of
$0.4 million, accounts payable and accrued expenses of
$2.6 million, long-term debt of $37.4 million, and
asset retirement obligations of $2.4 million in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2005. |
The Company completed its purchase accounting allocations for
the 2005 acquisitions in 2006 and recorded an additional
$3.8 million deferred tax liability related to the Larco
stock acquisition.
2006
Acquisitions and Dispositions
The Company closed the following acquisitions and dispositions
in 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
On March 15, 2006, the Company acquired from an executive
officer and director, an additional 12.5% interest in
PetroSource Energy Company, a consolidated subsidiary. The
acquisition consisted of the retirement of subordinated debt of
approximately $1.0 million and a $4.5 million cash
payment for the ownership interest acquired for a total
acquisition price of approximately $5.5 million.
|
|
|
|
On May 1, 2006, the Company purchased certain leases in
developed and undeveloped properties from an oil and gas
company. The purchase price was approximately $40.9 million
in cash. The cash consideration was paid in July 2006.
|
|
|
|
On May 26, 2006, the Company purchased several oil and
natural gas properties from an oil and gas company. The purchase
price was approximately $12.9 million, comprised of
$8.2 million in cash, and 251,351 shares of SandRidge
Energy, Inc. common stock (valued at $4.7 million). The
cash and equity consideration was paid in July 2006.
|
F-16
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
On June 1, 2006, the Company purchased certain producing
well interest from an executive officer and director. The
purchase price was approximately $9.0 million in cash. The
cash consideration was paid in July 2006.
|
|
|
|
On June 7, 2006, the Company acquired subordinated debt
plus accrued interest of approximately $0.1 million and the
remaining 1% interest in PetroSource Energy Company, a
consolidated subsidiary, from an oil and gas company. The
purchase price was 27,749 shares of SandRidge Energy, Inc.
common stock (valued at $0.5 million). The Company now owns
100% of PetroSource Energy Company.
|
The preceding 2006 acquisitions were financed with approximately
$63.7 million in cash and the issuance of
279,100 shares of common stock with an aggregate value of
approximately $5.1 million. Details are set forth below for
each of the acquisition transactions (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration Paid
|
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Retirement of
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant &
|
|
|
Minority
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Stock No. of
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Transaction
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Debt(1)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
PetroSource additional interests March 15, 2006
|
|
$
|
2,116
|
|
|
$
|
(2,370
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,489
|
|
Purchased leases May 1, 2006
|
|
|
40,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,960
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties May 26, 2006
|
|
|
12,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
4,650
|
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
Producing well interest from an executive officer and
director June 1, 2006
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
PetroSource additional interest (remaining 1%
interest) June 7, 2006
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
65,011
|
|
|
$
|
(2,763
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
$
|
5,128
|
|
|
$
|
63,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes retirement of subordinated debt of $972,000 and accrued
interest of $31,000. |
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2006, the Company sold leaseholds and lease and well
equipment for $16.0 million. The book basis of the assets
at the time of the sale transaction was $3.7 million. The
sale was accounted for as an adjustment to the full cost pool,
with no gain recognized.
|
|
|
|
In August 2006, the Company sold certain assets (Stockton Plaza,
Authentix Investment and certain other assets) to the
Companys former President and Chief Operating Officer, N.
Malone Mitchell, 3rd, for approximately $6.1 million in
cash. These investments had been accounted for under the cost
method and reflected as investments in the consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2005. The sale transaction
resulted in a $0.8 million gain recognized in earnings by
the Company in August 2006. The gain is included in loss (gain)
on sale of assets in the consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
On November 21, 2006, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding membership interests of NEG for approximately
$990.4 million in cash, the assumption of $300 million
in debt, the receipt of cash of $21.1 million, and the
issuance of 12,842,000 shares of SandRidge Energy, Inc.
common stock (valued at approximately $231.2 million). NEG
owned core assets in the Val Verde and Permian Basins of West
Texas, including overlapping or contiguous interests in the
properties that the Company owns in the West Texas Overthrust.
To finance the NEG acquisition, the Company entered into a new
$750 million senior secured credit facility and an
$850 million senior unsecured bridge loan facility. The
Company also issued $550 million of redeemable convertible
preferred stock and common units (consisting of
|
F-17
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase convertible
preferred stock upon the surrender of the common stock) in a
private placement to certain eligible purchasers.
|
The accompanying balance sheet at December 31, 2006
includes the allocations of the purchase price for the NEG
acquisition. The allocation of the purchase price to specific
assets and liabilities were based, in part, upon an appraisal of
the fair value of NEG assets. The Company continues to obtain
information to refine the fair value of the assets acquired and
the liabilities assumed. The Company expects that a final
allocation of the purchase price will be completed in fiscal
year 2007.
The following table presents the NEG acquisition purchase price
allocation, including professional fees and other related
acquisition costs, to the net assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, based on the fair values with the balance of the
purchase price, $26.2 million, included in goodwill at the
acquisition date (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
21,100
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
30,840
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
6,025
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,497,874
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
26,198
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
31,987
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
1,614,294
|
|
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
|
|
|
46,082
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,189
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
281,641
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
40,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
1,242,682
|
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
|
|
(21,100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount paid for acquisition
|
|
$
|
1,221,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has assigned all of the NEG goodwill to the
Exploration and Production segment. Goodwill in the amount of
$24.0 million is deductible for tax purposes.
F-18
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
Pro Forma
Information
The unaudited financial information in the table below
summarizes the combined results of operations of SandRidge and
NEG, on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been
combined as of January 1, 2005. The pro forma financial
information is presented for informational purposes only and is
not indicative of the results of operations that would have been
achieved if the acquisition had taken place on January 1,
2005 or of results that may occur in the future. The pro forma
adjustments include estimates and assumptions based on currently
available information. The Company believes the estimates and
assumptions are reasonable, and the significant effects of the
transactions are properly reflected. However, actual results may
differ materially from this pro forma financial information. The
following table presents the actual results for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2006 and the respective unaudited pro
forma information to reflect the NEG acquisition (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
287,693
|
|
|
$
|
560,235
|
|
|
$
|
388,242
|
|
|
$
|
565,256
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
17,893
|
|
|
|
(49,594
|
)
|
|
|
19,477
|
|
|
|
40,133
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
18,122
|
|
|
|
(49,594
|
)
|
|
|
19,477
|
|
|
|
40,133
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share available (applicable) to
common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
(0.96
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
(0.96
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
On September 30, 2005, the Company exchanged substantially
all of its land and agriculture operations with its majority
stockholder. The majority stockholder exchanged
1,414,849 shares of the Companys common stock for
these operations. The shares were exchanged at their historical
basis and the exchange was reflected as a treasury share
transaction. The net book value of assets exchanged was
$23.6 million. There was no gain (loss) recognized in this
transaction. The land and agriculture operations are presented
as discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the
consolidated statements of operations.
The following table summarizes net revenue and net income (loss)
from discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,968
|
|
|
$
|
1,683
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(1,285
|
)
|
|
|
(1,336
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No assets were classified as held for sale at December 31,
2005 or 2006.
F-19
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
A summary of accounts receivable is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Oil and gas service
|
|
$
|
12,809
|
|
|
$
|
8,489
|
|
Oil and gas sales
|
|
|
29,113
|
|
|
|
57,458
|
|
Joint interest billing
|
|
|
18,109
|
|
|
|
26,553
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,031
|
|
|
|
92,799
|
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(851
|
)
|
|
|
(3,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
59,180
|
|
|
$
|
89,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables show the balance in the allowance for
doubtful accounts and activity for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Deductions(1)
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
602
|
|
|
$
|
761
|
|
|
$
|
(289
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,074
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
1,074
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
(256
|
)
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
|
$
|
2,528
|
|
|
$
|
(354
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,025
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Deductions represent the write-off/recovery of receivables. |
Other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
$
|
2,369
|
|
|
$
|
7,604
|
|
Prepaid drilling
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
6,244
|
|
Post closing receivable NEG acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,232
|
|
Other
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current assets
|
|
$
|
3,244
|
|
|
$
|
31,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
$
|
160,789
|
|
|
$
|
1,636,832
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
33,974
|
|
|
|
282,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
194,763
|
|
|
|
1,919,206
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
(35,029
|
)
|
|
|
(60,752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and natural gas properties capitalized costs
|
|
|
159,734
|
|
|
|
1,858,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
738
|
|
Non oil and gas equipment
|
|
|
210,380
|
|
|
|
337,294
|
|
Buildings and structures
|
|
|
4,708
|
|
|
|
6,564
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
216,207
|
|
|
|
344,596
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(38,060
|
)
|
|
|
(68,332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs
|
|
|
178,147
|
|
|
|
276,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
337,881
|
|
|
$
|
2,134,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of capitalized interest in 2006 was approximately
$1.4 million and is included in the above non oil and gas
equipment balance. The Company did not capitalize any interest
in 2004 or 2005.
Costs
Excluded
Costs associated with unproved properties related to continuing
operations of $282.4 million as of December 31, 2006
are excluded from amounts subject to amortization. The majority
of the evaluation activities are expected to be completed within
a four-year period. In addition, the Companys internal
engineers evaluate all properties on an annual basis. The
average composite rates used for depreciation, depletion and
amortization were $0.69 per Mcfe in 2004, $1.23 per Mcfe in 2005
and $1.68 per Mcfe in 2006.
Costs
Excluded by Year Incurred (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluded
|
|
|
|
Year Cost Incurred
|
|
|
Costs at
|
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Property acquisition
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
251,839
|
|
|
$
|
251,839
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,535
|
|
|
|
30,535
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs incurred
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
282,374
|
|
|
$
|
282,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Investment
in Affiliated Companies
|
The Company has certain investments that it accounts for under
the equity method of accounting because its owns more than 20%
and has significant influence but does not control.
Additionally, the Company had various investments in other
companies in which it did not have the ability to exercise
significant influence and accounted for these investments under
the cost method. The carrying values of these other investments
were approximately $790,000 as of December 31, 2005 and
were sold in 2006 (Note 3).
The equity method investments include the following:
Grey Ranch, L.P. Grey Ranch is primarily engaged in
process and transportation of gas and natural gas liquids. The
Company purchased its investment during 2003. At
December 31, 2005 and 2006, the Company owned 50% of Grey
Ranch, L.P. and had approximately $824,000 and $2,201,000,
respectively, recorded in the consolidated balance sheets
relating to this investment. The Company contributed a
disproportionate amount of capital into the Partnership,
amounting to approximately $217,000 and $750,000, respectively,
as of December 31, 2005 and 2006. The excess amount
contributed is being amortized over the average life of the
partnerships long-lived assets.
Larclay, L.P. Larclay is a joint venture between the
Company and Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. (CWEI) and
was formed to acquire drilling rigs and provide land drilling
services. The Company purchased its investment in 2006 and
accounts for it under the equity method of accounting. The
Company and CWEI each own 50% interest in the joint venture. The
Company serves as the operations manager of the joint venture.
CWEI is responsible for financing and purchasing of the rigs. At
December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately $1,383,000
recorded in the consolidated balance sheet relating to this
investment.
Restricted deposits represent bank trust and escrow accounts
required (by the U.S. Department of Interiors
Minerals Management Service) to be set up to provide
satisfaction of the Companys eventual responsibility to
plug and abandon wells and remove structures when certain
offshore fields are no longer in use. These restricted deposits
were acquired as part of the NEG acquisition in November 2006
(See Note 3).
The restricted deposits include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
A $4.4 million escrow account for the East Breaks 109 and
110 fields set up in favor of the surety bond underwriter who
provides a surety bond to the MMS. The escrow account is fully
funded as of December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
A $7.2 million escrow account for the East Breaks 165 and
209 fields set up in favor of the surety bond underwriter who
provides a surety bond to the former owners of the fields and
the MMS. The escrow account is fully funded as of
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
A $6.6 million escrow account set up in favor of a major
oil company. The Company is required to make additional deposits
to the escrow account in an amount equal to 10% of the net cash
flow (as defined in the escrow agreement) from the properties
that were acquired from the major oil company.
|
|
|
|
A $6.2 million escrow account that was required to be set
up by the bankruptcy settlement proceedings of NEG. The Company
is required to make monthly deposits based on cash flows from
certain wells, as defined in the agreement.
|
|
|
|
A $8.8 million escrow account required to be set up by the
MMS relating to East Breaks properties. The Company is required
to make quarterly deposits to the escrow account of
$0.8 million. Additionally, for some of the East Break
properties, the Company will be required to deposit additional
funds in the East Break escrow accounts, representing the
difference between the required escrow deposit under
|
F-22
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
the surety bond and actual escrow deposit balance at various
points in time in the future. Aggregate payments to the East
Breaks escrow accounts are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
3,200
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
2010 and none thereafter
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Accounts
Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Accounts payable-trade
|
|
$
|
69,937
|
|
|
$
|
103,683
|
|
Payroll and benefits
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
10,718
|
|
Drilling advances
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
|
|
5,318
|
|
Legal (current)
|
|
|
15,643
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,850
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
95,435
|
|
|
$
|
129,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Senior credit facility
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
Senior bridge facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
Other notes payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rig fleet and related oil field services equipment
|
|
|
34,710
|
|
|
|
61,105
|
|
Sagebrush
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Insurance financing
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
7,240
|
|
Other equipment and vehicles
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
4,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
43,133
|
|
|
|
1,066,831
|
|
Less: Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
12,997
|
|
|
|
26,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
30,136
|
|
|
$
|
1,040,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility. On November 21,
2006, the Company entered into a $750 million senior
secured revolving credit facility (the senior credit
facility). The senior credit facility matures on
November 21, 2011.
The proceeds of the senior credit facility were used to
(i) partially finance the NEG acquisition,
(ii) refinance the existing senior secured revolving credit
facility and NEGs existing credit facility, and
(iii) pay fees and expenses related to the NEG acquisition
and the existing credit facility. Future borrowings under the
senior credit facility will be available for capital
expenditures, working capital and general corporate purposes and
to finance permitted acquisitions of oil and gas properties and
other assets related to the exploration, production and
development of oil and gas properties. The senior credit
facility will be available to be drawn
F-23
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
on and repaid without restriction so long as the Company is in
compliance with its terms, including certain financial covenants.
The senior credit facility contains various covenants that limit
the Company and certain of its subsidiaries ability to
grant certain liens; make certain loans and investments; make
distributions; redeem stock; redeem or prepay debt; merge or
consolidate with or into a third party; or engage in certain
asset dispositions, including a sale of all or substantially all
of the Companys assets. Additionally, the senior credit
facility limits the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries ability to incur additional indebtedness with
certain exceptions, including under the senior unsecured bridge
facility (as discussed below).
The senior credit facility also contains financial covenants,
including maintenance of agreed upon levels for the ratio of
(i) total funded debt to EBITDAX (as defined in the senior
credit facility), (ii) EBITDAX to interest expense plus
current maturities of long-term debt, and (iii) current
ratio.
The obligations under the senior credit facility are secured by
first priority liens on all shares of capital stock of each of
the Companys present and future subsidiaries; all
intercompany debt of the Company and its subsidiaries; and
substantially all of the Company assets and the assets of its
subsidiaries, including proven oil and gas reserves representing
at least 80% of the present discounted value (as defined in the
senior credit facility) of proven oil and gas reserves reviewed
in determining the borrowing base for the senior credit
facility. Additionally, the obligations under the senior credit
facility will be guaranteed by certain Company subsidiaries.
The borrowing base of proved reserves was initially set at
$300.0 million. As of December 31, 2006, the Company
had $140.0 million of outstanding indebtedness on the
senior credit facility.
At the Companys election, interest under the senior credit
facility is determined by reference to (i) the British
Bankers Association LIBOR rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable
margin between 1.25% and 2.00% per annum or (ii) the higher
of the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or the prime rate plus, in
either case, an applicable margin between 0.25% and 1.00% per
annum. Interest will be payable quarterly for prime rate loans
and at the applicable maturity date for LIBOR loans, except that
if the interest period for a LIBOR loan is six months, interest
will be paid at the end of each three-month period.
If an event of default exists under the senior credit facility,
the lenders may accelerate the maturity of the obligations
outstanding under the senior credit facility and exercise other
rights and remedies. Each of the following will be an event of
default:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to pay any principal when due or any interest, fees or
other amount within certain grace periods;
|
|
|
|
failure to perform or otherwise comply with the covenants in the
credit agreement or other loan
|
|
|
|
documents, subject, in certain instances, to certain grace
periods;
|
|
|
|
bankruptcy or insolvency events involving the Company or its
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
a change of control (as defined in the senior credit facility).
|
Senior Bridge Facility. On November 21,
2006, the Company also entered into a $850.0 million senior
unsecured bridge facility (the senior bridge
facility).
Together with borrowings under the senior credit facility, the
proceeds from the senior bridge facility were used to
(i) partially finance the NEG acquisition,
(ii) refinance existing senior secured revolving credit
facility and NEGs existing credit facility, and
(iii) pay fees and expenses related to the NEG acquisition
and the existing credit facility. The obligations under the
senior bridge facility are general unsecured obligations of the
company and certain of its subsidiaries.
F-24
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
The senior bridge facility will nominally mature 12 months
from the closing date for the facility (the Bridge
Maturity Date), or November 21, 2007, subject to the
automatic conversion described below. Any outstanding term loans
on the Bridge Maturity Date will automatically be converted into
new term loans with a five year term from the date of conversion
(the Rollover Loans). On and after the Bridge
Maturity Date, each bridge lender may elect to exchange its
Rollover Loans for senior unsecured exchange notes (the
Exchange Notes). Concurrent with the senior bridge
facility, the Company entered into an Exchange Notes
registration rights agreement whereby the Company is required to
file a shelf registration with respect to resales of the
Exchange Notes and have it declared effective no later than the
Bridge Maturity Date and to keep such registration statement
effective for as long as required by the holders to resell the
Exchange Notes. If the Company fails to comply with the terms of
the registration rights agreement the Company is required to pay
liquidated damages of 0.5% per annum on the principal amount of
Exchange Notes held for the first
90-day
period, increasing 0.5% per annum for each
90-day
period that the Company is in noncompliance, up to a maximum of
1.5% per annum.
The senior bridge facility contains customary restrictive
covenants pertaining to management and operations of the Company
and its subsidiaries similar to those contained in the senior
credit facility. Generally, amounts outstanding under the senior
bridge facility will bear interest at a base rate equal to the
greater of (i) three-month LIBOR plus an applicable margin
initially equal to 4.50% per annum or (ii) 9.0% per annum
plus an applicable margin initially equal to 0% per annum;
provided that the applicable margin for the senior bridge
facility will increase by 0.5% at the end of the period that is
six months after the closing date for the senior bridge facility
and an additional 0.25% per quarter thereafter for as long as
the senior bridge facility, Rollover Loans or Exchange Notes
remain outstanding subject to a cap of 11% (subject to certain
additional interest rate increases in certain circumstances). In
addition, the senior bridge facility includes a covenant that
obligates the Company to use commercially reasonable efforts to
refinance the senior bridge facility as promptly as practicable.
If the senior bridge facility is not refinanced or repaid within
12 months, the senior bridge facility will convert to a
Rollover Loan described above on the same terms and interest
rate as the senior bridge facility. The senior bridge facility
also requires net proceeds from any new debt or equity offering
to be applied to reduce indebtedness outstanding on the senior
bridge facility. Generally, these covenants can be waived by
lenders under the senior bridge facility that hold a majority of
the indebtedness outstanding.
The senior bridge facility also includes events of default
similar to those contained in the senior credit facility. If an
event of default under the senior bridge facility shall occur
and be continuing, the principal amount outstanding thereunder,
together with all accrued unpaid interest and other amounts owed
thereunder, may be declared immediately due and payable.
The Company repaid the senior bridge facility in March 2007 (See
Note 20).
Other Indebtedness. The Company has financed a
portion of its drilling rig fleet and related oil field services
equipment through notes. At December 31, 2006, the
aggregate outstanding balance of these credit agreements was
$61.1 million, with a fixed interest rate ranging from
7.64% to 8.87%. The notes have a final maturity date of
November 1, 2010, aggregate monthly installments for
principal and interest in the amount of $1.2 million and
are secured by the equipment. The notes have a prepayment
penalty (currently 1-3%) in the event the Company repays the
notes prior to maturity.
The Company has financed the purchase of various vehicles, oil
field services equipment and other equipment. The aggregate
outstanding balance of these notes as of December 31, 2006
was $4.5 million. Additionally, the Company has financed
its insurance payment made in 2006. The aggregate outstanding
balance of these notes as of December 31, 2006 was
$7.2 million.
On October 14, 2005, Sagebrush Pipeline, LLC borrowed
$4.0 million from Bank of America, N.A. for the purpose of
completing the gas processing plant and pipeline in Colorado.
This loan matures in July 2007,
F-25
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
and the interest rate is LIBOR plus 215 basis points. The
Company guaranteed this loan, and could be required to repay
this debt in full. The Company owns approximately 70% of
Sagebrush Pipeline, LLC. The Company anticipates that the
Sagebrush members will make additional equity investments to
Sagebrush to retire the debt when the loan matures.
Prior Senior Credit Facility. As of
December 31, 2005, we had a $90 million revolving
credit facility (the prior senior credit facility).
The prior senior credit facility included a $20 million
sub-limit for letters of credit. The prior senior credit
facility was replaced by the senior credit facility as of
November 21, 2006. Advances under the prior senior credit
facility were subject to a borrowing base based on the
Companys proved developed producing reserves, proved
developed nonproducing reserves and proved undeveloped reserves.
It was subject to re-determination semi-annually at the sole
discretion of the lender based on the reports of independent
petroleum engineers in accordance with normal and customary oil
and gas lending practices.
The prior senior credit facility bore interest at the
Companys option at either LIBOR plus 2.15% or the Bank of
America, N.A. prime rate. The Company paid a commitment fee on
the unused portion of the borrowing base amount equal to 1/8%
per annum. The prior senior credit facility was collateralized
by natural gas and oil properties representing at least 80% of
the present discounted value of the Companys proved
reserves and by a negative pledge on any of the Companys
nonmortgaged properties.
As of December 31, 2005, the borrowing base under the
Companys prior senior credit facility was $90 million
and no amounts were outstanding.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt during the next five
years are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
26,201
|
|
2008
|
|
|
15,818
|
|
2009
|
|
|
16,863
|
|
2010
|
|
|
11,819
|
|
2011
|
|
|
146,130
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
1,066,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has entered into various derivative contracts
including collars and fixed price swaps with a financial
institution. The contracts expire on various dates through
December 31, 2008.
F-26
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
At December 31, 2006, the Companys open commodity
derivative contracts consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg.
|
|
Period
|
|
Commodity
|
|
Notional
|
|
Fix Price
|
|
|
Fixed price swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2007 - September 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
3,060,000 MmBtu
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
January 2008 - June 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
3,640,000 MmBtu
|
|
$
|
7.987
|
|
January 2008 - June 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
3,640,000 MmBtu
|
|
$
|
7.99
|
|
Collars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
60,000 Bbls
|
|
$
|
50.00 - $84.50
|
|
January 2008 - June 2008
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
42,000 Bbls
|
|
$
|
50.00 - $83.35
|
|
July 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
54,000 Bbls
|
|
$
|
50.00 - $82.60
|
|
Waha basis swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
14,600,000 MmBtu
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
January 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
7,300,000 MmBtu
|
|
$
|
(0.5925
|
)
|
May 2007 - September 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
3,060,000 MmBtu
|
|
$
|
(0.65
|
)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
7,320,000 MmBtu
|
|
$
|
(0.6525
|
)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
7,320,000 MmBtu
|
|
$
|
(0.635
|
)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
7,320,000 MmBtu
|
|
$
|
(0.59
|
)
|
These derivatives have not been designated as hedges.
The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair
value. Changes in derivative fair values are recognized in
earnings. Cash settlements and valuation gains and losses are
included in loss (gain) on derivative contracts in the
consolidated statements of operations. The following summarizes
the cash settlements and valuation gains and losses for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Realized loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
2,681
|
|
|
$
|
2,836
|
|
|
$
|
(14,169
|
)
|
Unrealized loss (gain)
|
|
|
(1,803
|
)
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on derivative contracts
|
|
$
|
878
|
|
|
$
|
4,132
|
|
|
$
|
(12,291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company maintains a 401(k) retirement plan for its
employees. Under the plan, eligible employees may elect to defer
a portion of their earnings up to the maximum allowed by
regulations promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service. Prior
to August 2006, the Company made matching contributions equal to
50% on the first 6% of employee deferred wages (maximum 3%
matching). The Company modified the 401(k) retirement plan in
August 2006 to change the matching contributions to equal a
match of 100% on the first 15% of employee deferred wages
(maximum 15% matching). The plan was also modified to make the
matching contributions payable in Company common stock. As of
December 31, 2006, the Company has issued no shares related
to the matching contribution. An accrued payable in the amount
of $1.3 million is reflected in the consolidated balance
sheet related to the matching contributions. For 2004, 2005 and
2006, retirement plan expense was approximately
$0.2 million, $0.3 million and $1.5 million,
respectively.
F-27
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
(liabilities) as of December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
953
|
|
|
$
|
4,451
|
|
Other
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
|
$
|
6,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
(33,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,692
|
)
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
19,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(13,747
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,922
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provisions for income taxes for continuing operations
consisted of the following components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
3,235
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
5,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
9,460
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
6,433
|
|
|
$
|
9,460
|
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes from
continuing operations at the statutory federal tax rates to the
Companys actual provision for income taxes is as follows
for the year ended December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Computed at federal statutory rates
|
|
$
|
6,412
|
|
|
$
|
9,543
|
|
|
$
|
7,650
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Percentage depletion deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,488
|
)
|
Change in rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
6,433
|
|
|
$
|
9,968
|
|
|
$
|
6,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
As of December 31, 2006, the Company has fully utilized its
net operating loss carryforwards during 2006. The Company, as of
December 31, 2006, has approximately $770,000 of
alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire.
Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted
earnings per share are computed using the weighted average
shares outstanding during the year, but also include the
dilutive effect of awards of restricted stock. The following
table summarizes the calculation of weighted average common
shares outstanding used in the computation of diluted earnings
per share, for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and
2006 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,559
|
|
|
|
73,727
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common and potential common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
56,737
|
|
|
|
74,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In computing diluted earnings per share, the Company evaluated
the if-converted method. Under this method, the Company assumes
the conversion of the outstanding redeemable convertible
preferred stock to common stock and determines if this is more
dilutive than including the preferred stock dividends (paid and
unpaid) in the computation of income available to common
stockholders. The Company determined the if-converted method is
not more dilutive and has included preferred stock dividends in
the determination of income available to common stockholders.
|
|
16.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company has obligations under noncancelable operating
leases, primarily for the use of office space and equipment.
Total rental expense under operating leases for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, was approximately
$0.8 million, $1.1 million and $1.1 million,
respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating
leases (with initial lease terms in excess of one year) as of
December 31, 2006, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
2,180
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
2010
|
|
|
235
|
|
2011
|
|
|
235
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidated
Damages Under Registration Rights Agreements
December 2005 Private Placement. In connection
with the Companys private placement of common stock in
December 2005, the Company entered into a registration rights
agreement that requires the Company to use commercially
reasonable efforts to maintain effectiveness of this
registration statement or other shelf registration statements
covering the shares sold in such private placement until
December 21, 2007.
F-29
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
Generally, if the Company fails to maintain an effective
registration statement, the Company will be subject to
liquidated damages payments equal to a percentage of the gross
proceeds of the offering for each day that the Company is not in
compliance. The payments increase every 90 days, up to a
maximum as specified in the registration rights agreement as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Compliance Period
|
1-90 Days
|
|
91-180 Days
|
|
181-270 Days
|
|
270+ Days
|
|
$1.2 million plus
|
|
1.0% per annum
|
|
1.5% per annum
|
|
2.0% per annum
|
0.5% per annum ($3,300 per day)
|
|
($6,600 per day)
|
|
($9,900 per day)
|
|
($13,200 per day)
|
November 2006 Private Placement. In connection
with the Companys private placement of convertible
preferred stock and common stock units, the Company entered into
a registration rights agreement that requires the Company to use
commercially reasonable efforts to maintain effectiveness of
this registration statement or other shelf registration
statements covering the shares sold in such private placement.
In general, if the Company fails to meet these deadlines or
maintain effectiveness, the Company will be subject to
liquidated damage payments equal to a percentage of the purchase
price of the securities sold in the November 2006 private
placement.
During the first nine months following any failure to meet the
deadlines described above, the payments will be equal to a
percentage of the purchase price of $550 million on a per
month basis until the default is cured. During the first month
following a default, the payment shall be equal to 0.25% of the
purchase price and shall increase by 0.25% per month to a
maximum of 0.75%. If the default has not been cured within eight
months, the payments will become equal to 2.0% per annum paid on
a monthly basis until such default is cured.
March 2007 Private Placement. In connection
with the Companys private placement of common stock in
March 2007, the Company entered into a registration rights
agreement that requires the Company to use commercially
reasonable efforts to maintain effectiveness of this
registration statement or other shelf registration statements
covering the shares sold in such private placement. Generally,
if the Company fails to maintain an effective registration
statement, the Company will be subject to liquidated damages
payments equal to a percentage of the gross proceeds of the
offering for each day that we are not in compliance. The
payments increase every 90 days, up to a maximum as
specified in the registration rights agreement as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Compliance Period
|
1-90 Days
|
|
91-180 Days
|
|
181-270 Days
|
|
270+ Days
|
|
$1.6 million plus
|
|
1.0% per annum
|
|
1.5% per annum
|
|
2.0% per annum
|
0.5% per annum ($4,400 per day)
|
|
($8,800 per day)
|
|
($13,200 per day)
|
|
($17,600 per day)
|
The Company has not recorded any amount related to liquidated
damages and does not believe any amounts will be paid.
The Company is a defendant in certain lawsuits from time to time
in the normal course of business. In managements opinion,
the Company is not currently involved in any legal proceedings
other than those specifically identified below, which
individually or in the aggregate, could have a material effect
on the financial condition, operations
and/or cash
flows of the Company.
Litigation with Conoco, Inc. In January 2007,
the Company settled outstanding litigation with Conoco, Inc. for
alleged unpaid overriding royalties on production by the Company
on certain leases in Pecos County, Texas. Conoco, Inc. alleged
that it was entitled to 12.5% of the proceeds from production
and the Company alleged that Conoco, Inc., at most, was only
entitled to a 5.0% overriding royalty on production. At
December 31, 2006, as a result of the settlement whereby
the Company will pay approximately $25.0 million plus
interest to settle the outstanding litigation, the Company had
approximately $25.0 million recorded as an
F-30
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
accrual to reflect the settlement amount. Interest accrues from
the settlement date in January 2007. The settlement payments are
to be made in $5.0 million increments on April 1,
2007, July 1, 2008, July 1, 2009, July 1, 2010,
and July 1, 2011. The settlement amount is included in
accrued expenses ($5.0 million) and other long-term
obligations ($20.0 million) in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006.
Roosevelt Litigation. On May 18, 2004,
the Company commenced a civil action seeking declaratory
judgment against Elliot Roosevelt, Jr., E.R. Family Limited
Partnership and Ceres Resource Partners, L.P. in the District
Court of Dallas County, Texas, 101st Judicial District,
SandRidge Energy, Inc. and Riata Energy Piceance, LLC v.
Elliot Roosevelt, Jr. et al, Cause
No. 92.717-C.
This suit sought a declaratory judgment relating to the rights
of the parties in and to certain leases in a defined area of
mutual interest in the Piceance Basin pursuant to an acquisition
agreement entered into in 1989, including the Companys
41,454 gross (16,193 net) acreage position. The Company
tried the case to a jury in July 2006. Before the case was
submitted to the jury, the trial court granted Roosevelt a
directed verdict stating that he owned a 25% deferred interest
in the Companys acreage after project payout. The directed
verdict is not likely to affect the Companys proved
reserves of 11.7 Bcfe, because of the requirement that
project payout be achieved before the deferred interest shares
in revenue. Other issues of fact were submitted to the jury. The
trial court recently entered a judgment favorable to Roosevelt.
The Company has filed a motion to modify the judgment and for a
new trial. Depending on the outcome of this motion, the Company
expects to appeal, at a minimum, from the entry of the directed
verdict. If the Company does not ultimately prevail, the
deferred interest will reduce the Companys economic
returns from the project, if project payout is achieved.
Yates Litigation. On April 29, 2005,
Harvey E. Yates Company (Heyco), filed a trespass to
try title suit against us in the District Court for Pecos
County, Texas, 112th Judicial District, Harvey E. Yates
Company v. Riata Energy, Inc., Cause No. 10376. In
February 2006, additional parties joined the case as plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs seeks title to a 44.57% working interest in a
lease covering three sections of land and a 18.66% working
interest in a lease covering 1.5 sections of land, each located
in West Texas, as well as unspecified damages based on
production attributable to these working interests. The
plaintiffs claims stem from the alleged failure of the
Companys predecessors in title to assign the disputed
working interest in 1994. The Company believes that it has
record title to the interest claimed by plaintiffs. Further, the
Company believes the claims are barred by the four year statute
of limitations, which the Company believes ran in 1998. If the
plaintiffs prevail, any recovery would not be expected to have a
material impact on proved reserves. The Company is currently in
the preliminary stages of discovery.
The Company is subject to other claims in the ordinary course of
business. However, the Company believes that the ultimate
resolution of the above mentioned claims and other current legal
proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its
results of operations or its financial condition.
|
|
17.
|
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock
|
In November 2006, the Company sold 2,136,667 shares of
redeemable convertible preferred stock as part of the NEG
acquisition and received net proceeds from this sale of
approximately $439.5 million after deducting offering
expenses of approximately $9.3 million (See Note 3).
Each holder of the redeemable convertible preferred stock is
entitled to quarterly cash dividends at the annual rate of 7.75%
of the accreted value of its redeemable convertible preferred
stock. The accreted value is $210 per share as of
December 31, 2006. The redeemable convertible preferred
stock is mandatorily redeemable at a future determinable date
and thus classified as mezzanine equity. Each share of
convertible preferred stock is initially convertible into ten
shares of common stock at the option of the holder, subject to
certain anti-dilution adjustments.
On January 31, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a dividend on the outstanding shares of redeemable
convertible preferred stock. The dividend of $3.21 per share was
paid in cash on February 15, 2007. The dividend covered the
time period from November 21, 2006, when the shares were
issued, through
F-31
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
February 1, 2007. Approximately $3.8 million of
dividends (pro rata amount from November 21, 2006 through
December 31, 2006) has been included in the
Companys earnings per share calculation in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
On June 8, 2006, Tom L. Ward purchased approximately
29 million shares of common stock from the Companys
founder, N. Malone Mitchell, 3rd, and other existing
stockholders for $500 million at $17.25 per share. The
purchase made Mr. Ward the Companys largest
stockholder. He joined the Company as Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Mitchell
retained approximately 22 million shares and continues to
serve as a member of the Board of Directors.
The following table presents information regarding
SandRidges common stock (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Shares authorized
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
72,917
|
|
|
|
91,604
|
|
Shares held in treasury
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
The Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, no par value, of which no shares were
outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and 2006. On
September 23, 2005, 1,000 shares of preferred stock
were converted into common stock.
Stock Split. On December 19, 2005, the
Company entered into a 281.562 for 1 stock split. All references
in the accompanying financial statements have been restated to
reflect this stock split. The Company also authorized
400,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of
$0.001 per share.
Common Stock Issuance. In December 2005, the
Company sold 12.5 million shares of common stock in a
private placement and received net proceeds from this sale of
approximately $173.1 million after deducting the initial
purchasers discount of $16.8 million and offering
expenses of approximately $1.2 million. Approximately
$105.5 million of the proceeds of the offering were used to
repay outstanding bank debt and finance the Companys
December 2005 acquisitions (See Note 3).
In January 2006, the Company issued an additional
239,630 shares of common stock upon exercise by the
underwriters of an over-allotment option. The Company issued
these shares at a price of $15.00 per share after deducting the
purchasers fee of $0.3 million. The Company received
net proceeds from sale of approximately $3.3 million.
In November 2006, the Company sold 5.3 million common units
(consisting of shares of common stock ($18.00 per share) and a
warrant ($1.00 per share) to purchase convertible preferred
stock upon the surrender of the common stock) as part of the NEG
acquisition and received net proceeds from this sale of
approximately $97.4 million after deducting the offering
expenses of approximately $3.9 million (See Note 3).
Treasury Stock. Employees may elect to satisfy
their tax obligations on the vesting of their restricted stock
by having the Company make the required tax payments and
withhold a number of vested shares having a value on the date of
vesting equal to the tax obligation. As a result of such
employee elections, during the year ended December 31, 2006
the Company withheld approximately 29,000 shares at a total
value of $0.5 million, and those shares were accounted for
as treasury stock. No shares were withheld in 2004 or 2005.
Restricted Stock. The Company issues
restricted stock awards under incentive compensation plans which
vest over specified periods of time (one, four and seven years).
These shares of restricted common stock are subject to
restriction on transfer and certain conditions to vesting.
F-32
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
The Company granted restricted stock awards for approximately
1.6 million shares in December 2005. The stock awards were
granted with one, four, and seven year vesting periods as
follows: (i) 153,667 shares vest on the earlier of
(x) December 31, 2006 or (y) the expiration of
the lock-up
agreement entered into by officers in connection with the
Companys December 2005 private placement,
(ii) 904,833 shares vest on the earlier of
(x) June 30, 2010 or (y) the fourth anniversary
of the completion of a registered initial public offering, and
(iii) 493,667 shares vest on the earlier of
(x) June 30, 2013 or (y) the seventh anniversary
of the completion of a registered initial public offering.
In June 2006, the Company modified the vesting periods of the
one year period and four year period restricted stock awards.
One year restricted stock awards granted under the Riata 2005
Stock Plan were modified to vest on October 1, 2006, rather
than December 31, 2006. Four year restricted stock awards
granted under the Riata 2005 Stock Plan were modified to vest
25% each January 1, for four years, beginning
January 1, 2007 rather than cliff vesting on June 30,
2010. The modification of the four year awards was completed
pursuant to a plan that all restricted stock awards, in the
future, will be four year terms vesting 25% each year. The
Company recognized compensation cost related to this
modification of $17,250 in June 2006.
Additionally, the Company modified the vesting period related to
restricted shares awarded to certain executive officers, due to
the executive officers resignations in June 2006 and
August 2006. As part of the executive officers separation
from the Company, the Board of Directors agreed to immediately
vest all of the executive officers restricted stock. At
the time of the modification and resignation in June 2006, one
of the executive officers had 83,333 restricted stock awards
(6,667 one year vesting, 66,666 four year vesting, 10,000 seven
year vesting). The Company recognized compensation cost related
to these shares of $1.3 million in the year ended
December 31, 2006. At the time of the other modifications
and resignations in August 2006, these executive officers had
138,667 restricted stock awards (13,667 one year vesting, 83,334
four year vesting, 41,666 seven year vesting). The Company
recognized compensation cost related to these shares of
$2.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2006.
In December 2006, the Company modified the vesting period
related to restricted shares for employees due to these
employees resignations from the Company in late December
2006. As part of these employees separation from the
Company, the Board of Directors agreed to immediately vest the
restricted stock for these employees that were previously due to
vest on January 1, 2007. At the time of the modification
and resignations of the employees in December 2006, the number
of shares that were immediately vested was 39,960. The employees
forfeited the remaining amounts of their unvested restricted
shares. The Company recognized additional compensation cost in
December 2006 for these shares of approximately
$0.1 million due to the modification.
Restricted stock activity for the year ended December 31,
2006 was as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unvested restricted shares outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
18.49
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
17.22
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted shares outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
$
|
15.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, the Company recognized
stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock of
approximately $8.8 million in 2006 and $0.5 million in
2005. Stock-based compensation expense is reflected in general
and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of
operations.
F-33
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
As of December 31, 2006, there was approximately
$11.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested restricted stock awards which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 2.6 years.
|
|
19.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
During the ordinary course of business, the Company has
transactions with certain stockholders and other related
parties. These transactions primarily consist of purchases of
drilling equipment and sales of oil field service supplies and
gas sales. Following is a summary of significant transactions
with such related parties as of and for the year ended December
31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Sales to related parties
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
$
|
12,673
|
|
|
$
|
14,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from related parties for services rendered
|
|
$
|
1,116
|
|
|
$
|
5,376
|
|
|
$
|
5,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables to related parties for services rendered
|
|
$
|
3,757
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of services from related parties
|
|
$
|
9,556
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
4,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the Company entered into a new facilities
lease with a member of its Board of Directors. The lease extends
to August 2009 with annual future rental payments of
$1.1 million in 2007 and 2008 and $0.7 million in
2009. The Company believes that the rent expense it must pay
under this lease is at fair market rates. Rent expense in 2006
related to this facilities lease was $0.3 million.
On March 22, 2007 the Company entered into
$1.0 billion in senior unsecured term loans (the Term
Loans). The closing of the Term Loans was generally
contingent upon closing the private placement of common equity
described below. The Term Loans included both fixed rate term
loans and floating rate term loans. Approximately
$650.0 million was issued at a fixed rate of 8.625% with
principal due on April 1, 2015 (the Fixed Rate Term
Loans). Under the terms of the Fixed Rate Term Loans,
interest is payable quarterly and during the first four years
interest may be paid, at the Companys option, either
entirely in cash or entirely with additional Fixed Rate Term
Loans. If the Company elects to pay the interest due during any
period in additional Fixed Rate Term Loans, the interest rate
increases to 9.375% during such period. After April 1, 2011
the Fixed Rate Term Loans may be prepaid in whole or in part
with prepayment penalties as follows (the prepayment penalty is
multiplied by the principal amount prepaid):
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Prepayment Penalty
|
|
|
April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012
|
|
|
4.313
|
%
|
April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013
|
|
|
2.156
|
%
|
April 1, 2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $350.0 million of the Term Loans was issued
at a variable rate with interest payable quarterly and principal
due on April 1, 2014 (the Variable Rate Term
loans). The Variable Rate Term Loans bear interest, at the
Companys option, at the British Bankers Association LIBOR
rate plus 3.625% or the higher of (i) the federal funds
rate, a defined, plus 3.125% or (ii) a Banks prime
rate plus 2.625%. After
F-34
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
April 1, 2009 the Variable Rate Term Loans may be prepaid
in whole or in part with a prepayment penalty as follows (the
prepayment penalty is multiplied by the principal amount
prepaid):
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Prepayment Penalty
|
|
|
April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
April 1, 2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
After one year from the closing date, the Company is required to
offer to exchange the Term Loans for senior unsecured notes with
registration rights. The senior unsecured notes will have
identical terms and conditions as the Term Loans. If the Company
is unable to or does not offer to exchange the Term Loans for
senior unsecured notes with registration rights by the specified
date, the interest rate on the Term Loans will increase by 0.25%
every 90 days up to a maximum of 0.50%.
Debt covenants under the Term Loans are ordinary and customary
and include limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness,
payment of dividends, asset sales, certain asset purchases,
transactions with related parties, and consolidation or merger
agreements.
On March 20, 2007, the Company sold approximately
17.8 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of
$320.0 million. The stock was sold in private sales to
various investors including Tom Ward, the Companys
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer,
who invested $61.4 million in exchange for approximately
3.4 million shares of common stock.
A portion of the proceeds from the Term Loans was used to repay
the Companys $850.0 million senior bridge facility.
|
|
21.
|
Industry
Segment Information
|
SandRidge has four business segments: Exploration and
Production, Drilling and Oil Field Services, Midstream Gas
Services, and Other representing its four main business units
offering different products and services. The Exploration and
Production segment is engaged in the development, acquisition
and production of oil and natural gas properties. The Drilling
and Oil Field Services segment is engaged in the land contract
drilling of oil and natural gas wells, and the Midstream Gas
Services segment is engaged in the purchasing, gathering,
processing and treating of natural gas. The Other segment
transports
CO2
to market for use by the Company and others in tertiary oil
recovery operations and other miscellaneous operations.
F-35
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(Note 1). Management evaluates the performance of
SandRidges operating segments based on operating income,
which is defined as operating revenues less operating expenses
and depreciation, depletion and amortization. Summarized
financial information concerning the Companys segments is
shown in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
39,226
|
|
|
$
|
54,425
|
|
|
$
|
106,990
|
|
Elimination of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production, net of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
37,564
|
|
|
|
54,051
|
|
|
|
106,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling and oil field services
|
|
|
59,179
|
|
|
|
109,766
|
|
|
|
211,055
|
|
Elimination of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
19,968
|
|
|
|
29,615
|
|
|
|
72,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling and oil field services, net of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
39,211
|
|
|
|
80,151
|
|
|
|
138,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream services
|
|
|
132,158
|
|
|
|
192,503
|
|
|
|
192,960
|
|
Elimination of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
33,114
|
|
|
|
45,004
|
|
|
|
70,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream services, net of inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
99,044
|
|
|
|
147,499
|
|
|
|
122,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
6,164
|
|
|
|
21,411
|
|
Elimination of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
5,992
|
|
|
|
20,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
175,995
|
|
|
$
|
287,693
|
|
|
$
|
388,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,886
|
|
|
$
|
17,069
|
|
Drilling and oil field services
|
|
|
4,206
|
|
|
|
18,295
|
|
|
|
32,946
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
3,528
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(3,224
|
)
|
|
|
(16,562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
|
20,750
|
|
|
|
34,053
|
|
|
|
36,981
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(1,622
|
)
|
|
|
(5,071
|
)
|
|
|
(15,795
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
18,830
|
|
|
$
|
27,861
|
|
|
$
|
21,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Assets(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
125,745
|
|
|
$
|
243,612
|
|
|
$
|
2,091,459
|
|
Drilling and oil field services
|
|
|
35,807
|
|
|
|
100,995
|
|
|
|
175,169
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
25,208
|
|
|
|
33,845
|
|
|
|
75,606
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,258
|
|
|
|
80,231
|
|
|
|
46,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
197,018
|
|
|
$
|
458,683
|
|
|
$
|
2,388,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
29,105
|
|
|
$
|
61,227
|
|
|
$
|
170,872
|
|
Drilling and oil field services
|
|
|
22,679
|
|
|
|
43,730
|
|
|
|
89,810
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
2,026
|
|
|
|
25,904
|
|
|
|
16,975
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,116
|
|
|
|
3,735
|
|
|
|
28,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
57,926
|
|
|
$
|
134,596
|
|
|
$
|
306,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
4,911
|
|
|
$
|
8,796
|
|
|
$
|
28,104
|
|
Drilling and oil field services
|
|
|
5,932
|
|
|
|
11,851
|
|
|
|
20,268
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
Other
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$
|
12,674
|
|
|
$
|
24,206
|
|
|
$
|
55,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Identifiable assets are those used in SandRidges
operations in each industry segment. Corporate assets are
principally cash and cash equivalents, corporate leasehold
improvements, furniture and equipment. |
|
|
22.
|
Supplemental
Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities
(Unaudited)
|
The Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas Producing
Activities is presented as required by SFAS No. 69,
Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities.
The supplemental information includes capitalized costs related
to oil and gas producing activities; costs incurred for the
acquisition of oil and gas producing activities, exploration and
development activities; and the results of operations from oil
and gas producing activities. Supplemental information is also
provided for per unit production costs; oil and gas production
and average sales prices; the estimated quantities of proved oil
and gas reserves; the standardized measure of discounted future
net cash flows associated with proved oil and gas reserves; and
a summary of the changes in the standardized measure of
discounted future net cash flows associated with proved oil and
gas reserves.
The Companys capitalized costs consisted of the following
(in thousands):
Capitalized
Costs Related to Oil and Gas Producing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Consolidated Companies(a)
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
$
|
94,758
|
|
|
$
|
160,789
|
|
|
$
|
1,636,832
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
33,974
|
|
|
|
282,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
95,502
|
|
|
|
194,763
|
|
|
|
1,919,206
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
(26,034
|
)
|
|
|
(35,029
|
)
|
|
|
(60,752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and natural gas properties capitalized costs
|
|
$
|
69,468
|
|
|
$
|
159,734
|
|
|
$
|
1,858,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts relate to SandRidge and Consolidated Subsidiaries.
Includes capitalized asset retirement costs and associated
accumulated depreciation. |
F-37
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
Costs
Incurred in Property Acquisition, Exploration and Development
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Acquisitions of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,554
|
|
|
$
|
1,311,029
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
21,085
|
|
|
|
268,839
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
2,527
|
|
|
|
18,612
|
|
Development
|
|
|
27,357
|
|
|
|
60,364
|
|
|
|
115,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost incurred
|
|
$
|
30,363
|
|
|
$
|
98,530
|
|
|
$
|
1,713,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys results of operations from oil and gas
producing activities for each of the years 2004, 2005 and 2006
are shown in the following table (in thousands):
Results
of Operations for Oil and Gas Producing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Companies(a)
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
30,976
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs
|
|
|
12,727
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses
|
|
|
4,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
17,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
13,479
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities
|
|
$
|
8,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
48,405
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs
|
|
|
19,352
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses
|
|
|
8,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
28,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
20,058
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
7,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities
|
|
$
|
13,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Companies(a)
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
101,252
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs
|
|
|
39,363
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses
|
|
|
25,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
65,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
36,166
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
10,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities
|
|
$
|
25,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below represents the Companys estimate of proved
crude oil and natural gas reserves attributable to the
Companys net interest in oil and gas properties based upon
the evaluation by the Company and its independent petroleum
engineers of pertinent geological and engineering data in
accordance with United States Securities and Exchange Commission
regulations. Estimates of substantially all of the
Companys proved reserves have been prepared by the team of
independent reservoir engineers and geoscience professionals and
are reviewed by members of the Companys senior management
with professional training in petroleum engineering to ensure
that the Company consistently applies rigorous professional
standards and the reserve definitions prescribed by the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., DeGolyer and
MacNaughton and Harper & Associates, Inc., independent oil
and gas consultants, have prepared the estimates of proved
reserves of natural gas and crude oil attributable to several
portions of the Companys net interest in oil and gas
properties as of the end of one or more of 2004, 2005 and 2006.
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., DeGolyer and
MacNaughton and Harper & Associates, Inc. are independent
petroleum engineers, geologists, geophysicists and
petrophysicists and do not own an interest in us or our
properties and are not employed on a contingent basis.
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. prepared the
estimates of proved reserves for all of our properties other
than those held by PetroSource, which constitute approximately
97% of our total proved reserves as of December 31, 2006.
DeGolyer and MacNaughton prepared the estimates of proved
reserves for PetroSource, which constitute approximately 2% of
our total proved reserves as of December 31, 2006. The
small remaining portion of estimates of proved reserves were
based on Company estimates.
The Company believes the geologic and engineering data examined
provides reasonable assurance that the proved reserves are
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing
economic and operating conditions. Estimates of proved reserves
are subject to change, either positively or negatively, as
additional information is available and contractual and economic
conditions change.
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of
crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids which geological
and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing
economic and operating conditions, that is, prices and costs as
of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration
of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual
arrangements, but not on escalations based upon future
conditions. Proved developed reserves are the quantities of
crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas expected to be
recovered through existing investments in wells and field
infrastructure under current operating conditions. Proved
undeveloped reserves require additional investments in wells and
related infrastructure in order to recover the production.
During 2006, the Company recognized additional reserves
attributable to extensions and discoveries as a result of
successful drilling in the Piñon Field. Drilling
expenditures of $18.6 million resulted in the addition
F-39
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
of 10.9 Bcfe of net proved developed reserves by extending
the field boundaries as well as proving the producing
capabilities of formations not previously captured as proved
reserves. The remaining 83.1 Bcfe of net proved reserves
for 2006 are proved undeveloped reserves associated with direct
offsets to the 2006 drilling program extending the boundaries of
the Piñon Field and zone identification. Changes in
reserves associated with the development drilling have been
accounted for in revisions of previous reserve estimates.
Reserve
Quantity Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Companies(a)
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
|
Nat. Gas
|
|
|
|
(MBbls)
|
|
|
(MMcf)(b)
|
|
|
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2003
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
121,256
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(18,955
|
)
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,859
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(6,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
144,452
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
11,679
|
|
Acquisitions of new reserves
|
|
|
9,518
|
|
|
|
32,022
|
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
56,133
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(6,873
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
10,436
|
|
|
|
237,413
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
19,139
|
|
Acquisitions of new reserves
|
|
|
13,753
|
|
|
|
514,170
|
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
93,396
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(13,410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
25,175
|
|
|
|
850,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2003
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
48,513
|
|
As of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
50,981
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
69,377
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
10,259
|
|
|
|
255,654
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts relate to SandRidge and Consolidated Subsidiaries. |
|
(b) |
|
Natural gas reserves are computed at 14.65 pounds per square
inch absolute and 60 degrees Fahrenheit. |
The standardized measure of discounted cash flows and summary of
the changes in the standardized measure computation from year to
year are prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 69. The
assumptions that underlie the computation of the standardized
measure of discounted cash flows may be summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the standardized measure includes the Companys estimate of
proved crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas reserves
and projected future production volumes based upon year-end
economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
pricing is applied based upon year-end market prices adjusted
for fixed or determinable contracts that are in existence at
year-end;
|
F-40
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
future development and production costs are determined based
upon actual cost at year-end;
|
|
|
|
the standardized measure includes projections of future
abandonment costs based upon actual costs at year-end; and
|
|
|
|
a discount factor of 10% per year is applied annually to the
future net cash flows.
|
Standardized
Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Related to
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Companies(a)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows from production
|
|
$
|
843,647
|
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
(227,257
|
)
|
Future development costs(b)
|
|
|
(77,588
|
)
|
Future income tax expenses
|
|
|
(183,193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted future net cash flows
|
|
|
355,609
|
|
10% annual discount
|
|
|
(156,647
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
198,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows from production
|
|
$
|
2,558,668
|
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
(653,748
|
)
|
Future development costs(b)
|
|
|
(296,489
|
)
|
Future income tax expenses
|
|
|
(546,867
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted future net cash flows
|
|
|
1,061,564
|
|
10% annual discount
|
|
|
(562,410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
499,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows from production
|
|
$
|
5,901,660
|
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
(1,623,216
|
)
|
Future development costs(b)
|
|
|
(931,947
|
)
|
Future income tax expenses
|
|
|
(638,599
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted future net cash flows
|
|
|
2,707,898
|
|
10% annual discount
|
|
|
(1,267,752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
1,440,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts relate to SandRidge and Consolidated Subsidiaries. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes abandonment costs. |
F-41
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
The following table represents the Companys estimate of
changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net
cash flows from proved reserves (in thousands):
Changes
in the Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
From
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Companies (a)
|
|
|
Present value as of December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
157,299
|
|
Changes during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues less production and other costs
|
|
|
(18,249
|
)
|
Net changes in prices, production and other costs
|
|
|
5,911
|
|
Development costs incurred
|
|
|
21,912
|
|
Net changes in future development costs
|
|
|
(16,360
|
)
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
105,603
|
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
|
|
(38,234
|
)
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
25,244
|
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
(20,720
|
)
|
Timing differences and other(b)
|
|
|
(23,444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change for the year
|
|
|
41,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value as of December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
198,962
|
|
Changes during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues less production and other costs
|
|
|
(29,053
|
)
|
Net changes in prices, production and other costs
|
|
|
225,227
|
|
Development costs incurred
|
|
|
56,368
|
|
Net changes in future development costs
|
|
|
(86,828
|
)
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
96,514
|
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
|
|
47,501
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
28,981
|
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
(155,250
|
)
|
Purchases of reserves in-place
|
|
|
196,206
|
|
Timing differences and other(b)
|
|
|
(79,474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change for the year
|
|
|
300,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Restated) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Companies (a)
|
|
|
Present value as of December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
499,154
|
|
Revenues less production and other costs
|
|
|
(61,889
|
)
|
Net changes in prices, production and other costs
|
|
|
(294,437
|
)
|
Development costs incurred
|
|
|
75,323
|
|
Net changes in future development costs
|
|
|
(75,466
|
)
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
126,061
|
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
|
|
54,313
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
73,643
|
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
(36,962
|
)
|
Purchases of reserves in-place
|
|
|
1,135,062
|
|
Timing differences and other(b)
|
|
|
(54,656
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change for the year
|
|
|
940,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value as of December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
1,440,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts relate to SandRidge and Consolidated Subsidiaries. |
|
(b) |
|
The change in timing differences and other are related to
revisions in the Companys estimated time of production and
development. |
F-43
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
38,948
|
|
|
$
|
32,013
|
|
Accounts receivable, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
89,774
|
|
|
|
71,957
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
5,731
|
|
|
|
16,727
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,903
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,544
|
|
|
|
4,249
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
6,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
31,494
|
|
|
|
20,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
174,806
|
|
|
|
173,397
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties, using full cost method of
accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
1,636,832
|
|
|
|
2,388,534
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
282,374
|
|
|
|
247,757
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
(60,752
|
)
|
|
|
(174,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,858,454
|
|
|
|
2,461,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
276,264
|
|
|
|
427,756
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,139
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
26,198
|
|
|
|
27,076
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
3,584
|
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
33,189
|
|
|
|
39,851
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
15,889
|
|
|
|
29,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,388,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,170,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
26,201
|
|
|
$
|
14,293
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
129,799
|
|
|
|
181,227
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
3,182
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,740
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
158,792
|
|
|
|
205,442
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,040,630
|
|
|
|
1,437,211
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
21,219
|
|
|
|
16,219
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
45,216
|
|
|
|
57,508
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
24,922
|
|
|
|
32,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,293,831
|
|
|
|
1,749,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
5,092
|
|
|
|
5,605
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value,
2,650 shares authorized; 2,137 and 2,184 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2006 and September 30,
2007, respectively
|
|
|
439,643
|
|
|
|
450,356
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par; 50,000 shares authorized; no
shares issued and outstanding in 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 400,000 shares
authorized; 93,048 issued and 91,604 outstanding at
December 31, 2006 and 109,272 issued and 107,820
outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
574,868
|
|
|
|
889,211
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(17,835
|
)
|
|
|
(18,496
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
92,693
|
|
|
|
94,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
649,818
|
|
|
|
965,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,388,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,170,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-44
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas and crude oil
|
|
$
|
46,419
|
|
|
$
|
319,556
|
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
105,713
|
|
|
|
56,928
|
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
91,218
|
|
|
|
71,131
|
|
Other
|
|
|
19,827
|
|
|
|
14,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
263,177
|
|
|
|
461,775
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
21,625
|
|
|
|
77,707
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
12,328
|
|
Drilling and services
|
|
|
72,670
|
|
|
|
30,935
|
|
Midstream and marketing
|
|
|
85,525
|
|
|
|
61,191
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization natural gas
and crude oil
|
|
|
13,932
|
|
|
|
115,876
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization other
|
|
|
22,106
|
|
|
|
36,545
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
32,024
|
|
|
|
45,781
|
|
Gain on derivative contracts
|
|
|
(16,176
|
)
|
|
|
(55,228
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(1,704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
233,436
|
|
|
|
323,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
29,741
|
|
|
|
138,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
(88,630
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
Income from equity investments
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(3,883
|
)
|
|
|
(81,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
25,858
|
|
|
|
56,993
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,931
|
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
18,927
|
|
|
|
35,991
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
18,927
|
|
|
$
|
5,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income per share available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
71,692
|
|
|
|
102,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
72,633
|
|
|
|
103,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-45
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
574,868
|
|
|
$
|
(17,835
|
)
|
|
$
|
92,693
|
|
|
$
|
649,818
|
|
Stock offering, net of $1.4 million in offering costs
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
318,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318,670
|
|
Conversion of common stock to redeemable convertible preferred
stock
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(9,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,651
|
)
|
Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,062
|
)
|
|
|
(1,062
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,579
|
)
|
Common stock issued under retirement plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,962
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,991
|
|
|
|
35,991
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,322
|
)
|
|
|
(33,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
889,211
|
|
|
$
|
(18,496
|
)
|
|
$
|
94,300
|
|
|
$
|
965,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-46
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
18,927
|
|
|
$
|
35,991
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
36,038
|
|
|
|
152,421
|
|
Debt issuance cost amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,903
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,662
|
|
|
|
20,004
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
(2,007
|
)
|
|
|
(36,052
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(1,704
|
)
|
Interest income restricted deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,024
|
)
|
Income from equity investments, net of distributions
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(3,399
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
8,156
|
|
|
|
4,962
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
1,862
|
|
|
|
53,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
|
|
239,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(181,231
|
)
|
|
|
(895,160
|
)
|
Acquisition of assets
|
|
|
(63,125
|
)
|
|
|
(3,001
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
19,742
|
|
|
|
6,458
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions on equity investments
|
|
|
(3,388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,638
|
)
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(223,256
|
)
|
|
|
(897,341
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
295,215
|
|
|
|
1,262,769
|
|
Repayments of borrowings
|
|
|
(177,425
|
)
|
|
|
(879,592
|
)
|
Dividends paid preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,366
|
)
|
Minority interest contributions (distributions)
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
192
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
319,966
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,579
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,540
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
120,743
|
|
|
|
650,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(35,013
|
)
|
|
|
(6,935
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
|
|
|
45,731
|
|
|
|
38,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
|
$
|
10,718
|
|
|
$
|
32,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums financed
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,496
|
|
Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,062
|
|
Common stock issued in connection with acquisitions
|
|
$
|
5,128
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock dividends, net of
dividends paid
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,956
|
|
Property, plant and equipment addition due to settlement
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,500
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-47
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Nature of Business. SandRidge Energy, Inc. and
its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company,
SandRidge, we, us, or
our) is an oil and gas company with its principal
focus on exploration, development and production related to oil
and gas activities. SandRidge also owns and operates drilling
rigs and provides related oil field services, midstream gas
services operations, and
CO2
and tertiary oil recovery operations. SandRidges primary
exploration, development and production areas are concentrated
in West Texas. The Company also operates significant interests
in the Cotton Valley Trend in East Texas and Gulf Coast area.
On November 21, 2006, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding membership interests of NEG Oil & Gas LLC
(NEG).
Interim Financial Statements. The accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2006 has been derived from our audited financial statements
contained in the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1/A
filed October 23, 2007 (the Registration
Statement). The unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements of SandRidge and its subsidiaries have been
prepared by the Company in accordance with the accounting
policies stated in the audited consolidated financial statements
contained in the Companys
S-1/A filed
October 23, 2007 pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted,
although we believe that the disclosures contained herein are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation
in accordance with GAAP have been included in these unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements. These
condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the
Registration Statement.
|
|
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
For a description of the Companys accounting policies,
refer to Note 1 of the 2006 consolidated financial
statements included in the Companys Registration
Statement, as well as Note 10 herein.
Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications
have been made in prior period financial statements to conform
with current period presentation.
Change in Method of Accounting for Oil and Gas
Operations. In the fourth quarter of 2006, the
Company changed from the successful efforts method to the full
cost method of accounting for its oil and gas operations. Prior
period financial statements presented herein have been restated
to reflect the change.
SandRidges financial results have been retroactively
restated to reflect the conversion to the full cost method. As
prescribed by full cost accounting rules, all costs associated
with property acquisition, exploration, and development
activities are capitalized. Exploration and development costs
include dry hole costs, geological and geophysical costs, direct
overhead related to exploration and development activities and
other costs incurred for the purpose of finding oil and gas
reserves.
F-48
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A comparison of the Companys previously presented income
tax expense, net income, and earnings per share under the
successful efforts method of accounting to its results of
operations disclosed herein are as follows (in thousands, except
per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(As originally
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
|
presented)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
8,998
|
|
|
$
|
6,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,175
|
|
|
$
|
18,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Natural Gas Operations. The Company
uses the full cost method to account for its natural gas and oil
properties. Under full cost accounting, all costs directly
associated with the acquisition, exploration and development of
natural gas and oil reserves are capitalized into a full
cost pool. These capitalized costs include costs of all
unproved properties, internal costs directly related to the
Companys acquisition, exploration and development
activities and capitalized interest. These costs are amortized
using a unit-of-production method. Under this method, the
provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization is
computed at the end of each quarter by multiplying total
production for such quarter by a depletion rate. The depletion
rate is determined by dividing the total unamortized cost base
by net equivalent proved reserves at the beginning of the
quarter.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In September
2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, which establishes a formal framework for
measuring fair values of assets and liabilities in financial
statements that are already required by GAAP to be measured at
fair value. SFAS No. 157 clarifies guidance in FASB
Concepts Statement (CON) No. 7 which discusses
present value techniques in measuring fair value. Additional
disclosures are also required for transactions measured at fair
value. No new fair value measurements are prescribed, and
SFAS No. 157 is intended to codify the several
definitions of fair value included in various accounting
standards. However, the application of this Statement may change
current practices for certain companies. SFAS No. 157
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting
SFAS No. 157 on the financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option For Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115(SFAS No. 159), which
permits an entity to choose to measure certain financial assets
and liabilities at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also revises
provisions of SFAS No. 115 that apply to
available-for-sale and trading securities. This statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. The Company has not yet evaluated the potential impact of
this standard.
|
|
3.
|
Acquisitions
and Dispositions
|
On March 15, 2006, the Company acquired from an executive
officer and director, an additional 12.5% interest in
PetroSource Energy Company, a consolidated subsidiary. The
acquisition consisted of the extinguishment of subordinated debt
of approximately $1.0 million and a $4.5 million cash
payment for the ownership interest acquired for a total
acquisition price of approximately $5.5 million.
On May 1, 2006, the Company purchased certain leases in
developed and undeveloped properties from an oil and gas
company. The purchase price was approximately $40.9 million
in cash. The cash consideration was paid in July 2006.
F-49
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
On May 26, 2006, the Company purchased several oil and
natural gas properties from an oil and gas company. The purchase
price was approximately $12.9 million, comprised of
$8.2 million in cash, and 251,351 shares of SandRidge
Energy, Inc. common stock (valued at $4.7 million). The
cash and equity consideration was paid in July 2006.
On June 7, 2006, the Company acquired the remaining 1%
interest in PetroSource Energy Company, a consolidated
subsidiary, from an oil and gas company. The purchase price was
27,749 shares of SandRidge Energy, Inc. common stock
(valued at $0.5 million). As a result of this acquisition,
the Company became a 100% owner of PetroSource Energy Company.
In July 2006, the Company sold leaseholds and lease and well
equipment for $16.0 million. The book basis of the assets
at the time of the sale transaction was $3.7 million
resulting in a gain of $12.3 million. The sale was
accounted for as an adjustment to the full cost pool, with no
gain recognized.
|
|
4.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
$
|
1,636,832
|
|
|
$
|
2,388,534
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
282,374
|
|
|
|
247,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
1,919,206
|
|
|
|
2,636,291
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
(60,752
|
)
|
|
|
(174,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and natural gas properties capitalized costs
|
|
|
1,858,454
|
|
|
|
2,461,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
Non oil and gas equipment
|
|
|
337,294
|
|
|
|
491,000
|
|
Buildings and structures
|
|
|
6,564
|
|
|
|
37,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
344,596
|
|
|
|
530,069
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(68,332
|
)
|
|
|
(102,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs
|
|
|
276,264
|
|
|
|
427,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
2,134,718
|
|
|
$
|
2,889,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of capitalized interest in the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007 was approximately
$1.0 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and is
included in the above non oil and gas equipment balance.
On July 11, 2007, the Company purchased property to serve
as its future corporate headquarters. The 3.51-acre site
contains four buildings and is located in downtown Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma. The purchase price of the property was
approximately $25 million in cash plus the assumption of an
obligation to indemnify the sellers in connection with pending
litigation involving the property. Payment of the purchase price
was funded through a draw on the Companys senior credit
facility. The related litigation was settled subsequent to
September 30, 2007, resulting in an additional cost to the
Company of $4.5 million which was treated as an adjustment
to the purchase price of the property. For additional discussion
of this settlement, refer to Note 17 herein.
F-50
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill from
December 31, 2006 to September 30, 2007 was as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
26,198
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
27,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjustments made in the nine months ended September 30,
2007 related to the preliminary purchase allocation in
connection with the NEG acquisition in November 2006. The
Company has assigned all of the NEG goodwill to the Exploration
and Production segment.
|
|
6.
|
Asset
Retirement Obligation
|
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying
amounts of the asset retirement obligations for the period of
December 31, 2006 to September 30, 2007 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
45,216
|
|
Liability incurred upon acquiring and drilling wells
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
Revisions in estimated cash flows
|
|
|
7,747
|
|
Liability settled in current period
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Accretion of discount expense
|
|
|
2,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation, September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
57,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Senior credit facility
|
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Senior bridge facility
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Other notes payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rig fleet and related oil field services equipment
|
|
|
61,105
|
|
|
|
51,261
|
|
Sagebrush
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance financing
|
|
|
7,240
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Other equipment and vehicles
|
|
|
4,486
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,066,831
|
|
|
|
1,451,504
|
|
Less: Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
26,201
|
|
|
|
14,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,040,630
|
|
|
$
|
1,437,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility. On November 21,
2006, the Company entered into a $750 million senior
secured revolving credit facility (the senior credit
facility). The senior credit facility matures on
November 21, 2011.
The proceeds of the senior credit facility were used to
(i) partially finance the NEG acquisition,
(ii) refinance the existing senior secured revolving credit
facility and NEGs existing credit facility, and
(iii) pay fees and expenses related to the NEG acquisition
and the existing credit facility. Future borrowings under the
F-51
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
senior credit facility will be available for capital
expenditures, working capital and general corporate purposes and
to finance permitted acquisitions of oil and gas properties and
other assets related to the exploration, production and
development of oil and gas properties. The senior credit
facility will be available to be drawn on and repaid without
restriction so long as the Company is in compliance with its
terms, including certain financial covenants.
The senior credit facility contains various covenants that limit
the Company and certain of its subsidiaries ability to
grant certain liens; make certain loans and investments; make
distributions; redeem stock; redeem or prepay debt; merge or
consolidate with or into a third party; or engage in certain
asset dispositions, including a sale of all or substantially all
of the Companys assets. Additionally, the senior credit
facility limits the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries ability to incur additional indebtedness with
certain exceptions, including under the senior unsecured bridge
facility (as discussed below) which was repaid in full during
March 2007.
The senior credit facility also contains financial covenants,
including maintenance of agreed upon levels for the ratio of
(i) total funded debt to EBITDAX (as defined in the senior
credit facility), (ii) EBITDAX to interest expense plus
current maturities of long-term debt, and (iii) current
ratio. The Company was in compliance with these financial
covenants as of September 30, 2007.
The obligations under the senior credit facility are secured by
first priority liens on all shares of capital stock of each of
the Companys present and future subsidiaries; all
intercompany debt of the Company and its subsidiaries; and
substantially all of the Company assets and the assets of its
guarantor subsidiaries, including proven oil and gas reserves
representing at least 80% of the present discounted value (as
defined in the senior credit facility) of proven oil and gas
reserves reviewed in determining the borrowing base for the
senior credit facility. Additionally, the obligations under the
senior credit facility will be guaranteed by certain Company
subsidiaries.
At the Companys election, interest under the senior credit
facility is determined by reference to (i) the British
Bankers Association LIBOR rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable
margin between 1.25% and 2.00% per annum or (ii) the higher
of the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or the prime rate plus, in
either case, an applicable margin between 0.25% and 1.00% per
annum. Interest will be payable quarterly for prime rate loans
and at the applicable maturity date for LIBOR loans, except that
if the interest period for a LIBOR loan is six months, interest
will be paid at the end of each three-month period. The average
interest rates paid on amounts outstanding under our senior
credit facility for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2007 were 7.08% and 7.62%, respectively.
The borrowing base of proved reserves was initially set at
$300.0 million. As of December 31, 2006, the Company
had $140.0 million of outstanding indebtedness on the
senior credit facility. Proceeds from the Companys sale of
common stock on March 20, 2007, as described in
Note 14, were used to repay outstanding borrowings under
the Companys senior credit facility.
The borrowing base was increased to $400 million on
May 2, 2007, and to $700 million on September 14,
2007. At September 30, 2007, the Company had
$400 million in outstanding indebtedness under this
facility. The Company repaid all amounts outstanding under this
facility subsequent to September 30, 2007.
See Note 17 for further discussion.
Senior Bridge Facility. On November 21,
2006, the Company also entered into an $850.0 million
senior unsecured bridge facility (the senior bridge
facility), which was repaid in March 2007. The Company
expensed remaining unamortized debt issuance costs related to
the senior bridge facility of approximately $12.5 million
to interest expense in March 2007.
Together with borrowings under the senior credit facility, the
proceeds from the senior bridge facility were used to
(i) partially finance the NEG acquisition,
(ii) refinance existing senior secured revolving credit
F-52
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
facility and NEGs existing credit facility, and
(iii) pay fees and expenses related to the NEG acquisition
and the existing credit facility.
Senior Term Loans. On March 22, 2007 the
Company entered into $1.0 billion in senior unsecured term
loans (the senior term loans). The closing of the
senior term loans was generally contingent upon closing the
private placement of common equity as described in Note 14.
The senior term loans include both floating rate term loans and
fixed rate term loans. Approximately $350.0 million of the
senior term loans was issued at a variable rate with interest
payable quarterly and principal due on April 1, 2014 (the
variable rate term loans). The variable rate term
loans bear interest, at the Companys option, at the
British Bankers Association LIBOR rate plus 3.625% or the higher
of (i) the federal funds rate, as defined, plus 3.125% or
(ii) a Banks prime rate plus 2.625%. After
April 1, 2009 the variable rate term loans may be prepaid
in whole or in part with certain prepayment penalties. The
average interest rates paid on amounts outstanding under our
variable term loans for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2007 were 8.99% and 8.98%, respectively.
Approximately $650.0 million was issued at a fixed rate of
8.625% with the principal due on April 1, 2015 (the
fixed rate term loans). Under the terms of the fixed
rate term loans, interest is payable quarterly and during the
first four years interest may be paid, at the Companys
option, either entirely in cash or entirely with additional
fixed rate term loans. If the Company elects to pay the interest
due during any period in additional fixed rate term loans, the
interest rate increases to 9.375% during such period. After
April 1, 2011 the fixed rate term loans may be prepaid in
whole or in part with certain prepayment penalties.
After March 22, 2008, the Company is required to offer to
exchange the senior term loans for senior unsecured notes with
registration rights and with identical terms and conditions as
the term loans. If the Company is unable or does not offer to
exchange the senior term loans for senior unsecured notes with
registration rights by April 30, 2008, the interest rate on
the senior term loans will increase by 0.25% every 90 days
up to a maximum of 0.50%.
Debt covenants under the senior term loans include financial
covenants similar to those of the senior credit facility and
include limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness, payment
of dividends, asset sales, certain asset purchases, transactions
with related parties, and consolidation or merger agreements.
The Company incurred $26.1 million of debt issuance costs
in connection with the senior term loans. These costs are
included in other assets and amortized over the term of the
senior term loans. A portion of the proceeds from the senior
term loans was used to repay the Companys
$850.0 million senior bridge facility.
For the nine months ended September 30, interest payments,
net of amounts capitalized were approximately $4.6 million
in 2006 and $59.5 million in 2007.
|
|
8.
|
Other
Long-Term Obligations
|
The Company has recorded a long-term obligation for amounts to
be paid under a settlement agreement with Conoco, Inc.
(Conoco). During January 2007, the Company agreed to
pay approximately $25.0 million plus interest to Conoco to
settle outstanding litigation. Under this agreement, payments
are to be made in $5.0 million increments on April 1,
2007, July 1, 2008, July 1, 2009, July 1, 2010,
and July 1, 2011. On March 30, 2007, the Company made
the first $5.0 million settlement payment plus accrued
interest. The $5.0 million payment to be made on
July 1, 2008 has been included in accounts payable-trade in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
September 30, 2007. Unpaid settlement amounts of
approximately $20.0 million and $15.0 million have
been included in other long-term obligations in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31,
2006 and September 30, 2007, respectively.
F-53
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company has entered into various derivative contracts
including collars, fixed price swaps, and basis swaps with
counterparties. The contracts expire on various dates through
December 31, 2009.
At September 30, 2007, the Companys open commodity
derivative contracts consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg.
|
Period
|
|
Commodity
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Fix Price
|
|
Fixed price swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2007 - October 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
4,280,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$7.02
|
April 2007 - October 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
4,280,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$7.50
|
September 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
1,220,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.88
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
920,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$7.60
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
920,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$7.82
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
920,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.00
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
920,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.04
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
920,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.77
|
October 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
920,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$9.04
|
November 2007 - June 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
4,860,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.05
|
November 2007 - June 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
9,720,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.20
|
November 2007 - March 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
1,520,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.51
|
January 2008 - June 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
3,640,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$7.99
|
January 2008 - June 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
3,640,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$7.99
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
3,660,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.23
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
3,660,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.48
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
3,660,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$9.00
|
May 2008 - August 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
2,460,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.38
|
July 2008 - September 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
920,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.23
|
July 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
1,840,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$8.31
|
Collars:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
|
60,000
|
Bbls
|
|
$50.00 - $84.50
|
January 2008 - June 2008
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
|
42,000
|
Bbls
|
|
$50.00 - $83.35
|
July 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
|
54,000
|
Bbls
|
|
$50.00 - $82.60
|
Waha basis swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
7,300,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.5925)
|
January 2007 - December 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
14,600,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.70)
|
April 2007 - October 2007
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
4,280,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.530)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
10,980,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.57)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
7,320,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.585)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
7,320,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.59)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
3,660,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.595)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
3,660,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.625)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
7,320,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.635)
|
January 2008 - December 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
7,320,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.6525)
|
May 2008 - August 2008
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
2,460,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.45)
|
January 2009 - December 2009
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
3,650,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.47)
|
January 2009 - December 2009
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
3,650,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.49)
|
January 2009 - December 2009
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
3,650,000
|
MmBtu
|
|
$(0.4975)
|
F-54
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
These derivatives have not been designated as hedges and the
Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair
value. Changes in derivative fair values are recognized in
earnings. Cash settlements and valuation gains and losses are
included in gain on derivative contracts in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations. The following summarizes
the cash settlements and valuation gains and losses for the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Realized gain
|
|
$
|
(14,169
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,176
|
)
|
Unrealized loss (gain)
|
|
|
(2,007
|
)
|
|
|
(36,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on derivative contracts
|
|
$
|
(16,176
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting
principles, the Company estimates for each interim reporting
period the effective tax rate expected for the full fiscal year
and uses that estimated rate in providing income taxes on a
current year-to-date basis.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of
FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The
Company has determined that no uncertain tax positions exist
where the Company would be required to make additional tax
payments. As a result, the Company has not recorded any
additional liabilities for any unrecognized tax benefits as of
September 30, 2007. The Company and its subsidiaries file
income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state
jurisdictions. Tax years 1994 to present remain open for the
majority of taxing authorities. The Companys accounting
policy is to recognize penalties and interest related to
unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. The Company
does not have an accrued liability for the payment of penalties
and interest at September 30, 2007.
For the nine months ended September 30, income tax payments
were approximately $1.9 million in 2006 and
$2.7 million in 2007.
Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted
earnings per share are computed using the weighted average
shares outstanding during the year, but also include the
dilutive effect of awards of restricted stock. The following
table summarizes the calculation of weighted average common
shares outstanding used in the computation of diluted earnings
per share, for the nine month periods ended September 30,
2006 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
|
|
71,692
|
|
|
|
102,562
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common and potential common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
72,633
|
|
|
|
103,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In computing diluted earnings per share, the Company evaluated
the if-converted method. Under this method, the Company assumes
the conversion of the outstanding redeemable convertible
preferred stock to common stock and determines if this is more
dilutive than including the preferred stock dividends (paid and
unpaid) in the computation of income available to common
stockholders. The Company determined the
F-55
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
if-converted
method is not more dilutive and has included preferred stock
dividends in the determination of income available to common
stockholders.
|
|
12.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company is a defendant in certain lawsuits from time to time
in the normal course of business. In managements opinion,
the Company is not currently involved in any legal proceedings
other than those specifically identified below, which
individually or in the aggregate, could have a material effect
on the financial condition, operations
and/or cash
flows of the Company.
Roosevelt Litigation. On May 18, 2004,
the Company commenced a civil action seeking declaratory
judgment against Elliot Roosevelt, Jr., E.R. Family Limited
Partnership and Ceres Resource Partners, L.P. in the District
Court of Dallas County, Texas, 101st Judicial District,
SandRidge Energy, Inc. and Riata Energy Piceance, LLC v.
Elliot Roosevelt, Jr. et al, Cause
No. 92.717-C.
This suit sought a declaratory judgment relating to the rights
of the parties in and to certain leases in a defined area of
mutual interest in the Piceance Basin pursuant to an acquisition
agreement entered into in 1989, including the Companys
41,454 gross (16,193 net) acreage position. The Company
tried the case to a jury in July 2006. Before the case was
submitted to the jury, the trial court granted Roosevelt a
directed verdict stating that he owned a 25% deferred interest
in the Companys acreage after project payout. The directed
verdict is not likely to affect the Companys proved
reserves of 11.7 Bcfe, because of the requirement that
project payout be achieved before the deferred interest shares
in revenue. Other issues of fact were submitted to the jury. The
trial court recently entered a judgment favorable to Roosevelt.
The Company has filed a motion to modify the judgment and for a
new trial. Depending on the outcome of this motion, the Company
expects to appeal, at a minimum, from the entry of the directed
verdict. If the Company does not ultimately prevail, the
deferred interest will reduce the Companys economic
returns from the project, if project payout is achieved.
The Company is subject to other claims in the ordinary course of
business. However, the Company believes that the ultimate
resolution of the above mentioned claims and other current legal
proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its
results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
|
|
13.
|
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock
|
In November 2006, the Company sold 2,136,667 shares of
redeemable convertible preferred stock as part of the NEG
acquisition and received net proceeds from this sale of
approximately $439.5 million after deducting offering
expenses of approximately $9.3 million. Each holder of the
redeemable convertible preferred stock is entitled to quarterly
cash dividends at the annual rate of 7.75% of the accreted value
of its redeemable convertible preferred stock. The accreted
value is $210 per share as of September 30, 2007. Each
share of convertible preferred stock is initially convertible
into ten shares of common stock at the option of the holder,
subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.
On January 31, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a dividend on the outstanding shares of redeemable
convertible preferred stock. The dividend of $3.21 per share was
paid in cash on February 15, 2007. The dividend covered the
time period from November 21, 2006, when the shares were
issued, through February 1, 2007.
On March 30, 2007, certain holders of the Companys
common units (consisting of shares of common stock and a warrant
to purchase redeemable convertible preferred stock upon the
surrender of common stock) exercised warrants to purchase
redeemable convertible preferred stock. The holders converted
526,316 shares of common stock into 47,619 shares of
redeemable convertible preferred stock.
On May 8, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a dividend on the outstanding shares of redeemable
convertible preferred stock. The dividend of $3.97 per share was
paid in cash on May 15, 2007. The dividend covered the time
period from February 2, 2007 through May 1, 2007.
F-56
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
On June 8, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a dividend on the outstanding shares of redeemable
convertible preferred stock. The dividend of $4.10 per share was
paid in cash on August 15, 2007. The dividend covered the
time period from May 2, 2007 through August 1, 2007.
On September 24, 2007, the Companys Board of
Directors declared a dividend on the outstanding shares of
redeemable convertible preferred stock. The dividend of $4.10
per share was paid in cash on November 15, 2007. The
dividend covers the time period from August 2, 2007 to
November 1, 2007.
Approximately $29.5 million in paid and unpaid dividends
have been included in the Companys earnings per share
calculations for the nine month period ended September 30,
2007, as presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
The following table presents information regarding
SandRidges common stock (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Shares authorized
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
91,604
|
|
|
|
107,820
|
|
Shares held in treasury
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
The Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, no par value, of which no shares were
outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and September 30,
2007.
Common Stock Issuance. In March 2007, the
Company sold approximately 17.8 million shares of common
stock for net proceeds of $318.7 million after deducting
offering expenses of approximately $1.4 million. The stock
was sold in private sales to various investors including Tom L.
Ward, the Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer, who invested $61.4 million in
exchange for approximately 3.4 million shares of common
stock.
Treasury Stock. The Company makes required tax
payments on behalf of employees as their stock awards vest and
then withholds a number of vested shares having a value on the
date of vesting equal to the tax obligation. As a result of such
transactions, the Company withheld 41,095 shares at a total
value of $0.7 million during the nine month period ended
September 30, 2007. These shares were accounted for as
treasury stock.
On June 28, 2007, the Company purchased 39,844 shares
of its common stock into treasury through an open market
repurchase program in order to fund a portion of its 401(K)
matching obligation as described below. Cash consideration for
these shares of approximately $0.8 million was paid in July
2007.
On June 29, 2007, the Company transferred
72,044 shares of its treasury stock to the Companys
401k Plan brokerage account. The transfer was made in order to
satisfy the Companys $1.3 million accrued payable to
match employee contributions made to the plan during 2006.
Historical cost of the shares transferred totaled approximately
$0.9 million, resulting in an increase to the
Companys additional paid-in capital of approximately
$0.4 million.
Restricted Stock. The Company issues
restricted stock awards under incentive compensation plans which
vest over specified periods of time. Awards issued prior to 2006
vest over periods of one, four, or seven years. All awards
issued during and after 2006 have four year vesting periods.
These shares of restricted common stock are subject to
restriction on transfer and certain conditions to vesting.
For the nine months ended September 30, the Company
recognized stock-based compensation expense related to
restricted stock of approximately $8.2 million in 2006 and
$5.0 million in 2007. Stock-based compensation expense is
reflected in general and administrative expense in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations.
F-57
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
During the ordinary course of business, the Company has
transactions with certain shareholders and other related
parties. These transactions primarily consist of purchases of
drilling equipment and sales of oilfield service supplies.
Following is a summary of significant transactions with such
related parties for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
Sales to and reimbursements from related parties
|
|
$
|
12,070
|
|
|
$
|
72,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of services from related parties
|
|
$
|
3,656
|
|
|
$
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On June 1, 2006, the Company purchased certain producing
well interest from an executive officer and director. The
purchase price was approximately $9.0 million in cash. The
cash consideration was paid in July 2006.
In August 2006, the Company sold various non-energy related
assets to the Companys former President and Chief
Operating Officer, N. Malone Mitchell,
3rd,
for approximately $6.1 million in cash. The sale
transaction resulted in a $0.8 million gain recognized in
earnings by the Company in August 2006. The gain is included in
gain on sale of assets in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations.
In September 2006, the Company entered into a facilities lease
with a member of its Board of Directors. The Company believes
that the payments to be made under this lease are at fair market
rates. Rent expense related to the lease totaled
$0.1 million and $1.7 million for the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
The lease extends to August 2009.
On May 2, 2007, the Company purchased certain leasehold
acreage from a partnership controlled by a director. The
purchase price was approximately $8.3 million in cash.
On June 11, 2007, the Company purchased certain producing
well interests from a director. The purchase price was
approximately $3.5 million in cash.
Larclay, L.P. Larclay is a joint venture between the
Company and Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. (CWEI) and
was formed to acquire drilling rigs and provide land drilling
services. Larclay currently owns 12 rigs, one of which has not
been assembled. The Company purchased its investment in 2006 and
accounts for it under the equity method of accounting. The
Company serves as the operations manager of the joint venture.
CWEI is responsible for financing and purchasing of the rigs.
The Company had sales to and cost reimbursements from Larclay
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 of
$0.8 million. The Company had sales to and cost
reimbursements from Larclay for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 of $48.9 million. As of
December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007, the Company
had accounts receivable related party due from
Larclay of $3.0 million and $16.0 million,
respectively. Additionally, the Company made no purchases from
Larclay in 2006. The Company had purchases from Larclay for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 of $25.6 million.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had accounts payable
related party due to Larclay of $2.2 million.
|
|
16.
|
Industry
Segment Information
|
SandRidge has four business segments: Exploration and
Production, Drilling and Oilfield Services, Midstream Gas
Services, and Other representing its four main business units
offering different products and services. The Exploration and
Production segment is engaged in the development, acquisition
and production of oil and natural gas properties. The Drilling
and Oilfield Services segment is engaged in the land contract
drilling of oil and natural gas wells. The Midstream Gas
Services segment is engaged in the purchasing, gathering,
processing and treating of natural gas. The Other segment
transports
CO2
to market for use by the Company and others in tertiary oil
recovery operations and other miscellaneous operations.
F-58
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Management evaluates the performance of SandRidges
operating segments based on operating income, which is defined
as operating revenues less operating expenses and depreciation,
depletion and amortization. Summarized financial information
concerning our segments is shown in the following table (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
50,704
|
|
|
$
|
320,984
|
|
Elimination of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production, net of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
50,350
|
|
|
|
320,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling and oilfield services
|
|
|
154,295
|
|
|
|
188,887
|
|
Elimination of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
(48,040
|
)
|
|
|
(131,888
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling and oilfield services, net of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
106,255
|
|
|
|
56,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
137,329
|
|
|
|
189,143
|
|
Elimination of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
(46,115
|
)
|
|
|
(118,012
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream gas services, net of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
91,214
|
|
|
|
71,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15,578
|
|
|
|
19,780
|
|
Elimination of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(6,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net of inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
15,358
|
|
|
|
13,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
263,177
|
|
|
$
|
461,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
8,203
|
|
|
$
|
138,306
|
|
Drilling and oilfield services
|
|
|
27,178
|
|
|
|
14,252
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
5,958
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
(20,172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
|
29,741
|
|
|
|
138,344
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
(88,630
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
$
|
25,858
|
|
|
$
|
56,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
88,861
|
|
|
$
|
706,550
|
|
Drilling and oilfield services
|
|
|
53,832
|
|
|
|
104,796
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
25,406
|
|
|
|
45,427
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,132
|
|
|
|
38,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
181,231
|
|
|
$
|
895,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
14,902
|
|
|
$
|
117,329
|
|
Drilling and oilfield services
|
|
|
14,070
|
|
|
|
25,962
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,828
|
|
|
|
4,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$
|
36,038
|
|
|
$
|
152,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Identifiable Asset(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production
|
|
$
|
2,091,459
|
|
|
$
|
2,712,621
|
|
Drilling and oilfield services
|
|
|
175,169
|
|
|
|
264,272
|
|
Midstream gas services
|
|
|
75,606
|
|
|
|
108,031
|
|
Other
|
|
|
46,150
|
|
|
|
85,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,388,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,170,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Identifiable assets are those used in SandRidges
operations in each industry segment. |
Acquisitions. On October 9, 2007, the
Company purchased developed and undeveloped properties located
in West Texas from an oil and gas company. The purchase price
was approximately $74 million, comprised of
$25 million in cash and a $49 million note payable.
The $25 million cash consideration paid was funded through
a draw on the Companys senior credit facility. All
principal and accrued interest (interest at 7% annually) due on
the note payable were repaid on November 9, 2007 with
proceeds from the Companys initial public offering.
On November 28, 2007, the Company purchased additional
ownership in a gas treatment plant and related gathering system
located in Pecos County, Texas. The purchase price of
approximately $10.0 million was paid in cash.
On November 29, 2007, the Company purchased leasehold
acreage and producing well interests located predominately in
the WTO from a group of entities. The purchase price of
approximately $32.0 million was paid in cash.
Litigation Settlement. On October 29,
2007, the Company entered into an agreement whereby it settled
outstanding litigation related to certain property purchased by
the Company during July 2007. Under the terms of the agreement,
the Company paid $4.5 million to the counterparties on
November 15, 2007 and the litigation was dismissed. The
amount paid has been included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of September 30, 2007.
Note Payable. On November 15, 2007, the
Company entered into a note payable in the amount of
$20 million with a lending institution as a mortgage on the
downtown property purchased by the Company during July 2007 (see
additional discussion in Note 4). This note is fully
secured by one of the buildings and a parking garage located on
the downtown property, bears interest at 6.08%, and matures
November 15, 2022. Payments of principal and interest in
the amount of approximately $0.5 million are due on a
quarterly basis through the maturity date. During the next
twelve months, the Company expects to make payments of principal
and interest on this note totaling $1.0 million and
$1.1 million, respectively.
Initial Public Offering. On November 9,
2007, the Company completed an initial public offering (the
IPO) of its common stock. The Company sold
28,700,000 shares of SandRidge common stock, including
4,170,000 shares sold directly to an entity controlled by
Tom L. Ward. The shares were sold at a price of $26 per
share. After deducting underwriting discounts of approximately
$38.3 million and estimated offering expenses of
approximately $2.5 million, the Company received net
proceeds of approximately $705.4 million. This transaction
priced after market close on November 5, 2007. In
conjunction with the IPO, the underwriters were granted an
option to purchase 3,679,500 additional shares of the
Companys common stock. The underwriters fully exercised
this option and purchased the additional shares on
November 6, 2007. After deducting underwriting discounts of
approximately $5.7 million, the Company received net
proceeds of
F-60
SandRidge
Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
approximately $89.9 million from these additional shares.
This offering generated total gross proceeds to the Company of
$841.8 million and total net proceeds of approximately
$795.3 million to us after deducting total underwriting
discounts of approximately $44.0 million and other offering
expenses estimated to be approximately $2.5 million. The
aggregate net proceeds of approximately $795.3 million
received by the Company at closing on November 9, 2007 were
utilized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of outstanding balance and accrued interest on senior
credit facility
|
|
$
|
515.9
|
|
Repayment of note payable and accrued interest incurred in
connection with recent acquisition
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
Excess cash to fund future capital expenditures
|
|
|
230.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
795.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Member
NEG Oil & Gas LLC
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of NEG
Oil & Gas LLC and subsidiaries excluding National
Energy Group, Inc., and the
103/4%
Senior Notes due from National Energy Group, Inc., but including
National Energy Group Inc.s 50% membership interest in NEG
Holding LLC (collectively, the Company) as of
December 31, 2004 and 2005 and the related statements of
operations, changes in total members equity and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of NEG Oil & Gas LLC and subsidiaries
excluding National Energy Group, Inc. and the
103/4%
Senior Notes due from National Energy Group Inc., but including
National Energy Group Inc.s 50% membership interest in NEG
Holding LLC as of December 31, 2004 and 2005, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As discussed in Note 12 to the financial statements, the
Company adopted SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations on January 1, 2003, which is
considered as a change in accounting policy.
Houston, Texas
October 27, 2006
F-62
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC. AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP
INTEREST IN NEG HOLDING LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
30,846
|
|
|
$
|
102,322
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
36,613
|
|
|
|
53,378
|
|
Accounts receivable affiliates
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Drilling prepayments
|
|
|
3,460
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,993
|
|
|
|
9,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
79,251
|
|
|
|
168,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, at cost (full cost method)
|
|
|
929,088
|
|
|
|
1,229,923
|
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(397,870
|
)
|
|
|
(488,560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and gas properties
|
|
|
531,218
|
|
|
|
741,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property and equipment
|
|
|
5,595
|
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(4,593
|
)
|
|
|
(4,934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other property and equipment
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
Note receivable
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investment
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
23,519
|
|
|
|
24,267
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
4,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
642,296
|
|
|
$
|
940,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
28,914
|
|
|
$
|
18,105
|
|
Accounts payable revenue
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
11,454
|
|
Accounts payable affiliates
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
1,660
|
|
Current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
Current portion of note payable to affiliate
|
|
|
10,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance from affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,800
|
|
Prepayments from partners
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Accrued interest affiliates
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
Income tax payable affiliate
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
8,911
|
|
|
|
68,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
63,981
|
|
|
|
146,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility
|
|
|
51,834
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Notes payable, net of current maturities
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to affiliate net of current maturities
|
|
|
55,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas balancing
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
7,766
|
|
|
|
17,893
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
12,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
56,524
|
|
|
|
41,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
251,765
|
|
|
|
507,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members equity
|
|
|
390,531
|
|
|
|
433,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members equity
|
|
$
|
642,296
|
|
|
$
|
940,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-63
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.,
BUT INCLUDING NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50%
MEMBERSHIP
INTEREST IN NEG HOLDING LLC
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales gross
|
|
$
|
100,777
|
|
|
$
|
144,430
|
|
|
$
|
261,398
|
|
Unrealized derivative losses
|
|
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
(9,179
|
)
|
|
|
(69,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues net
|
|
|
97,790
|
|
|
|
135,251
|
|
|
|
192,144
|
|
Plant revenues
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
2,737
|
|
|
|
6,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
99,909
|
|
|
|
137,988
|
|
|
|
198,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
11,517
|
|
|
|
14,912
|
|
|
|
27,437
|
|
Transportation and gathering
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
3,144
|
|
|
|
4,978
|
|
Plant and field operations
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
|
|
3,918
|
|
|
|
3,769
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
8,144
|
|
|
|
10,883
|
|
|
|
16,560
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
39,409
|
|
|
|
60,394
|
|
|
|
91,100
|
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
3,019
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
7,703
|
|
|
|
11,650
|
|
|
|
14,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
70,599
|
|
|
|
105,494
|
|
|
|
161,015
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
29,310
|
|
|
|
32,494
|
|
|
|
37,840
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,034
|
)
|
|
|
(3,428
|
)
|
|
|
(8,198
|
)
|
Interest expense affiliate
|
|
|
(971
|
)
|
|
|
(3,054
|
)
|
|
|
(3,047
|
)
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
Interest income from related parties
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss on investment
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(1,118
|
)
|
Severance tax refund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitment fee income
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Gain on sale of equity investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,512
|
|
Loss on marketable securities
|
|
|
(954
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
26,005
|
|
|
|
32,727
|
|
|
|
31,808
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
12,615
|
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
2,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
38,620
|
|
|
|
32,467
|
|
|
|
34,740
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(1,741
|
)
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
36,879
|
|
|
|
31,655
|
|
|
|
34,740
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
38,791
|
|
|
$
|
31,655
|
|
|
$
|
34,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-64
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC. AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP
INTEREST IN NEG HOLDING LLC
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
38,791
|
|
|
$
|
31,655
|
|
|
$
|
34,740
|
|
Noncash adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
(14,953
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(2,935
|
)
|
Depreciation depletion and amortization
|
|
|
39,409
|
|
|
|
60,394
|
|
|
|
91,100
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized derivative losses
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
|
9,179
|
|
|
|
69,254
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(1,686
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
3,019
|
|
Equity in loss on investment
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
Gain on sale of equity investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,512
|
)
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(1,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income-restricted deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
Amortization of note discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Amortization of note costs
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,677
|
|
|
|
(6,340
|
)
|
|
|
(13,496
|
)
|
Drilling prepayments
|
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Derivative deposit
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
(1,030
|
)
|
|
|
(4,883
|
)
|
Note receivable
|
|
|
(1,832
|
)
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
12,014
|
|
|
|
(8,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
68,169
|
|
|
|
108,222
|
|
|
|
168,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition, exploration, and development costs
|
|
|
(40,962
|
)
|
|
|
(114,974
|
)
|
|
|
(315,880
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
4,981
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
Purchases of furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Equity investment
|
|
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
Investment in restricted deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,973
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of equity investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(41,553
|
)
|
|
|
(111,482
|
)
|
|
|
(313,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
(4,666
|
)
|
Net cash contributed by member
|
|
|
15,312
|
|
|
|
23,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from affiliate borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,800
|
|
Repayment of affiliate borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,357
|
)
|
Guaranteed payment to member
|
|
|
(18,229
|
)
|
|
|
(15,978
|
)
|
|
|
(15,978
|
)
|
Priority distribution
|
|
|
(40,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,326
|
|
Dividend payment to member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from credit facility
|
|
|
91,625
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
379,100
|
|
Principal payments on debt
|
|
|
(55,514
|
)
|
|
|
(9,365
|
)
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
Repayment of credit facility
|
|
|
(1,090
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130,934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
|
|
(9,354
|
)
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
216,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
17,262
|
|
|
|
(1,426
|
)
|
|
|
71,476
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
15,010
|
|
|
|
32,272
|
|
|
|
30,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
32,272
|
|
|
$
|
30,846
|
|
|
$
|
102,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
1,681
|
|
|
$
|
5,471
|
|
|
$
|
8,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of member note payable
|
|
$
|
10,940
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-65
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN TOTAL
MEMBERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total equity December 31, 2002
|
|
$
|
199,842
|
|
Contribution from member National Onshore
|
|
|
116,253
|
|
Guaranteed payment to member
|
|
|
(18,229
|
)
|
Payment of priority amount to member
|
|
|
(51,446
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
38,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total members equity December 31, 2003
|
|
|
285,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from member National Offshore
|
|
|
91,561
|
|
Contribution from member National Onshore minority
interest
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
Purchase of minority membership interest
|
|
|
(4,136
|
)
|
Guaranteed payment to member
|
|
|
(15,978
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
31,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total members equity December 31, 2004
|
|
|
390,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution of Notes Payable to AREP
|
|
|
89,143
|
|
Equity Contribution
|
|
|
5,326
|
|
Contribution of deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(5,471
|
)
|
Contribution of deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
12,799
|
|
Guaranteed payment to member
|
|
|
(15,978
|
)
|
Dividend distribution
|
|
|
(78,000
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
34,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total members equity December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
433,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-66
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Background
|
The accompanying combined financial statements present NEG
Oil & Gas LLC and subsidiaries, excluding National
Energy Group, Inc. and the
103/4% Senior
Notes due from National Energy Group, but including National
Energy Groups 50% membership interest in NEG Holding LLC
(collectively, the Company). The Company is an oil
and natural gas exploration and production company engaged in
the exploration, development, production and operations of
natural gas and oil properties, primarily located in Texas,
Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana (both onshore and in the Gulf
of Mexico).
NEG Oil & Gas LLC is wholly-owned by American Real
Estate Holdings Limited Partnership (AREH). AREH is
99% owned by American Real Estate Partners, L.P.
(AREP). AREP is a publicly traded limited
partnership that is majority owned by Mr. Carl C. Icahn.
NEG Oil & Gas LLC was formed on December 2, 2004
to hold the oil and gas investments of the Companys
ultimate parent company, AREP and, as of December 31, 2005
had the following assets and operations:
|
|
|
|
|
A 50.01% ownership interest in National Energy Group, Inc
(National Energy Group), a publicly traded oil and gas
management company. National Energy Groups principal asset
consists of its 50% membership interest in NEG Holding LLC
(Holding, LLC).
|
|
|
|
$148.6 million principal amount of
103/4% Senior
Notes due from National Energy Group (the
103/4% Senior
Notes).
|
|
|
|
A 50% managing membership interest in Holding, LLC.
|
|
|
|
The oil and gas operations of National Onshore LP (formerly
TransTexas Gas Corporation); and
|
|
|
|
The oil and gas operations of National Offshore LP (formerly
Panaco, Inc.)
|
All of the above assets initially were acquired by entities
owned or controlled by Mr. Icahn and subsequently acquired
by AREP (through subsidiaries) in various purchase transactions.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
assets transferred between entities under common control are
accounted for at historical cost similar to a pooling of
interest and the financial statements are combined from the date
of acquisition by an entity under common control. The financial
statements include the combined results of operations, financial
position and cash flows of each of the above entities since its
initial acquisition by entities owned or controlled by
Mr. Icahn (the Period of Common Control).
On September 7, 2006, AREP signed a letter of intent to
sell NEG Oil & Gas LLC and subsidiaries, excluding
National Energy Group, Inc. and the
103/4%
Senior Notes due from National Energy Group, but including
National Energy Groups 50% membership interest in Holding
LLC to Riata Energy, Inc., DBA SandRidge Energy, Inc.
(Riata Energy) The combined financial statements
include the entities to be sold to Riata Energy.
Background
National Energy Group, Inc. In February, 1999
National Energy Group was placed under involuntary, court
ordered bankruptcy protection. Effective August 4, 2000
National Energy Group emerged from involuntary bankruptcy
protection with affiliates of Mr. Icahn owning 49.9% of the
common stock and $165 million principal amount of debt
securities (Senior Notes). As mandated by National
Energy Groups Plan of Reorganization, Holding LLC was
formed and on September 1, 2001, National Energy Group
contributed to Holding LLC all of its oil and natural gas
properties in exchange for an initial membership
F-67
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
interest in Holding LLC. National Energy Group retained
$4.3 million in cash. On September 1, 2001, an
affiliate of Mr. Icahn contributed to Holding LLC oil and
natural gas assets, cash and a $10.9 million note
receivable from National Energy Group in exchange for the
remaining membership interest, which was designated the managing
membership interest. Concurrently, in September, 2001, but
effective as of May 2001, Holding LLC formed a 100% owned
subsidiary, NEG Operating Company, LLC (Operating
LLC) and contributed all of its oil and natural gas assets
to Operating LLC.
In October 2003, AREP acquired all outstanding Senior Notes
($148.6 million principal amount at October 2003) and
5,584,044 shares of common stock of National Energy Group
from entities affiliated with Mr. Icahn for aggregate
consideration of approximately $148.1 million plus
approximately $6.7 million of accrued interest on the
Senior Notes. As a result of this transaction and the
acquisition by AREP of additional shares of National Energy
Group, AREP beneficially owned 50.01% of the outstanding stock
of National Energy Group and had effective control. In June
2005, all of the stock of National Energy Group and the
$148.6 million principal amount of Senior Notes owned by
AREP was contributed to the Company and National Energy Group
became a 50.01% owned subsidiary. The accrued, but unpaid
interest on the $148.6 million principal amount of Senior
Notes was retained by AREP. National Energy Group and the Senior
Notes will be retained by AREP and not purchased by Riata Energy.
NEG Holding LLC On June 30, 2005, AREP
acquired the managing membership interest in Holding LLC from an
affiliate of Mr. Icahn for an aggregate consideration of
approximately $320 million. The membership interest
acquired constituted all of the membership interests other than
the membership interest already owned by National Energy Group.
The combined financial statements include the consolidation of
the acquired 50% membership interest in Holding LLC, together
with the 50% membership interest owned by National Energy Group.
The Period of Common Control for Holding LLC began on
September 1, 2001, the initial funding of Holding LLC.
The Holding LLC Operating Agreement Holding
LLC is governed by an operating agreement effective May 12,
2001, which provides for management and control of Holding LLC
by the Company and distributions to National Energy Group and
the Company based on a prescribed order of distributions (the
Holding LLC Operating Agreement).
Order
of Distributions
Pursuant to the Holding LLC Operating Agreement, distributions
from Holding LLC to National Energy Group and the Company shall
be made in the following order:
1. Guaranteed payments (Guaranteed Payments)
are to be paid to National Energy Group, calculated on an annual
interest rate of
103/4%
on the outstanding priority amount (Priority
Amount). The Priority Amount includes all outstanding debt
owed to the Company, including the amount of National Energy
Groups
103/4% Senior
Notes. As of December 31, 2005, the Priority Amount was
$148.6 million. The Guaranteed Payments will be made on a
semi-annual basis.
2. The Priority Amount is to be paid to National Energy
Group. Such payment is to occur by November 6, 2006.
3. An amount equal to the Priority Amount and all
Guaranteed Payments paid to National Energy Group, plus any
additional capital contributions made by the Company, less any
distributions previously made by Holding LLC to the Company, is
to be paid to the Company.
4. An amount equal to the aggregate annual interest
(calculated at prime plus
1/2%
on the sum of the Guaranteed Payments), plus any unpaid interest
for prior years (calculated at prime plus
1/2%
on the sum
F-68
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
of the Guaranteed Payments), less any distributions previously
made by Holding LLC to the Company, is to be paid to NEG
Oil & Gas.
5. After the above distributions have been made, any
additional distributions will be made in accordance with the
ratio of NEG Oil & Gas and National Energy
Groups respective capital accounts. (Capital accounts as
defined in the Holding LLC Operating Agreement.)
Redemption Provision
in the Holding LLC Operating Agreement
The Holding LLC Operating Agreement contains a provision that
allows the managing member (NEG Oil & Gas), at any
time, in its sole discretion, to redeem National Energy
Groups membership interest in Holding LLC at a price equal
to the fair market value of such interest determined as if
Holding LLC had sold all of its assets for fair market value and
liquidated.
Prior to closing the Riata Energy purchase transaction, AREP
will cause NEG Oil & Gas to exercise the redemption
provision and dividend the
103/4%
Senior Notes to AREP or enter into transactions with a similar
effect such that NEG Oil & Gas will own 100% of
Holding LLC and no longer own the
103/4% Senior
Notes receivable from National Energy Group. AREP will indemnify
NEG Oil & Gas for any costs associated with the
exercise of the redemption provision. The Holding LLC Operating
Agreement will be cancelled.
National Onshore LP On November 14,
2002, National Onshore filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
Texas, Corpus Christi Division. National Onshores First
Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization submitted by an entity
affiliated with Mr. Icahn, as modified on July 8, 2003
(the National Onshore Plan), was confirmed by the
Bankruptcy Court on August 14, 2003 effective
August 28, 2003.
As of the effective date of the National Onshore Plan, an entity
affiliated with Mr. Icahn owned 89% of the outstanding
shares of National Onshore. During June 2004, the entity
affiliated with Mr. Icahn acquired an additional 5.7% of
the outstanding shares of National Onshore from certain other
stockholders. During December 2004, National Onshore acquired
the remaining 5.3% of the outstanding shares that were not owned
by an affiliate of Mr. Icahn. The difference between the
purchase price for both acquisitions and the minority interest
liability was treated as a purchase price adjustment which
reduced the full cost pool.
On December 6, 2004, AREP purchased from an affiliates of
Mr. Icahn $27.5 million aggregate principal amount, or
100%, of the outstanding term notes issued by National Onshore
(the National Onshore Notes). The purchase price was
$28.2 million, which equals the principal amount of the
National Onshore Notes plus accrued unpaid interest. The notes
are payable annually in equal consecutive annual payments of
$5.0 million, with the final installment due
August 28, 2008. Interest is payable semi-annually in
February and August at the rate of 10% per annum.
On April 6, 2005, AREP acquired 100% of the outstanding
stock of National Onshore from entities owned by Mr. Icahn
for an aggregate consideration of $180 million. The
operations of National Onshore are considered to have been
contributed to the Company on August 28, 2003 at a
historical cost of approximately $116.3 million,
representing the historical basis in the assets and liabilities
of National Onshore of the entities owned by Mr. Icahn.
AREP contributed the National Onshore Notes, but not the accrued
and unpaid interest through the date of contribution, to the
Company on June 30, 2005. The Period of Common Control of
National Onshore began on August 28, 2003.
National Offshore LP On July 16, 2002,
National Offshore filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the
United States Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of
Texas. On November 3, 2004, the Bankruptcy Court entered a
confirmation order for the National
F-69
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Offshores Plan of Reorganization (the National
Offshore Plan). The National Offshore Plan became
effective November 16, 2004 and National Offshore began
operating as a reorganized entity. Upon emergence from
bankruptcy, an entity controlled by Mr. Icahn owned 100% of
the outstanding common stock of National Offshore.
On December 6, 2004, AREP purchased $38.0 million
aggregate principal amount of term loans issued by National
Offshore, which constituted 100% of the outstanding term loans
of National Offshore from an affiliate of Mr. Icahn. On
June 30, 2005, AREP contributed the National Offshore term
loan, but not the accrued and unpaid interest through the date
of contribution, to the Company.
On June 30, 2005, AREP acquired 100% of the equity of
National Offshore from affiliates of Mr. Icahn for
consideration valued at approximately $125.0 million. The
Period of Common Control for National Offshore began on
November 16, 2004 when National Offshore emerged from
bankruptcy. The acquisition of National Offshore has been
recorded effective December 31, 2004. The historical cost
of approximately $91.6 million, representing the historical
basis in the assets and liabilities of National Offshore of the
affiliates of Mr. Icahn, was considered to have been
contributed to the Company on December 31, 2004.
|
|
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
Basis
of Presentation
The combined financial statements include the accounts of NEG
Oil & Gas LLC and subsidiaries excluding National
Energy Group and the
103/4% Senior
Notes due from National Energy Group, but including National
Energy Groups 50% membership interest in NEG Holding LLC
(the Company). All material intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in the combined financial
statements. Investments in subsidiaries over which the Company
has significant influence, but not control, are reported using
the equity method.
Accounting
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from these estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents may include demand deposits,
short-term commercial paper,
and/or
money-market investments with maturities of three months or less
when purchased. Cash in bank deposit accounts are generally
maintained at high credit quality financial institutions and may
exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced
any losses in such accounts and does not believe it is exposed
to any significant risk of loss.
Oil
and Natural Gas Properties
The Company utilizes the full cost method of accounting for its
crude oil and natural gas properties. Under the full cost
method, all productive and nonproductive costs incurred in
connection with the acquisition, exploration, and development of
crude oil and natural gas reserves are capitalized and amortized
on the
units-of-production
method based upon total proved reserves. The Company elects to
include its current unevaluated properties in the full cost
pool. Conveyances of properties, including gains or losses on
F-70
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
abandonments of properties, are treated as adjustments to the
cost of crude oil and natural gas properties, with no gain or
loss recognized unless the sale or disposition represents a
significant portion of the Companys oil and natural gas
reserves.
Under the full cost method, the net book value of oil and
natural gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, may
not exceed the estimated after-tax future net revenues from
proved oil and natural gas properties, discounted at
10% per year (the ceiling limitation) plus the lower of
cost or fair value of unevaluated properties, if any. In
arriving at estimated future net revenues, estimated lease
operating expenses, development costs, abandonment costs,
certain production related ad-valorem taxes, and estimated
corporate income taxes relating to oil and gas properties, if
any, are deducted. In calculating future net revenues, prices
and costs in effect at the time of the calculation are held
constant indefinitely, except for changes which are fixed and
determinable by existing contracts. Such contracts may include
derivative contracts that meet the accounting requirements and
are documented, designated and accounted for as cash flow
hedges. None of the Companys derivatives contracts were
accounted for as cash flow hedges. Consequently, prices were
held constant indefinitely. The net book value is compared to
the ceiling limitation on a quarterly basis. The excess, if any,
of the net book value above the ceiling limitation is required
to be written off as a non-cash expense. The Company did not
incur a ceiling writedown in 2003, 2004 and 2005. There can be
no assurance that there will not be writedowns in future periods
under the full cost method of accounting as a result of
sustained decreases in oil and natural gas prices or other
factors.
The Company has capitalized internal costs of $0.6 million;
$1.0 million and $1.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively, as cost of
oil and natural gas properties. Oil and natural gas properties
include cumulative capitalized internal costs of
$2.4 million and $3.5 million as of December 31,
2004 and 2005. Such capitalized costs include salaries and
related benefits of individuals directly involved in the
Companys acquisition, exploration, and development
activities based on a percentage of their salaries. These costs
do not include any costs related to production, general
corporate overhead, or similar activities.
Costs associated with production and general corporate
activities are expensed in the period incurred. Production costs
are costs incurred to operate and maintain the Companys
wells and related equipment and include cost of labor, well
service and repair, location maintenance, power and fuel,
transportation, cost of product, property taxes, production and
severance taxes and production related general and
administrative costs.
The Company receives reimbursement for administrative and
overhead expenses incurred on behalf of other working interest
owners on properties the Company operates. Such reimbursements
are recorded as reductions to general and administrative
expenses to the extent of actual costs incurred. Reimbursements
in excess of actual costs incurred, if any, are credited to the
full cost pool to be recognized through lower cost amortization
as production occurs. Historically, the Company has not received
any administrative and overhead reimbursements in excess of
costs incurred.
The Company is subject to extensive federal, state, and local
environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are
constantly changing, regulate the discharge of materials into
the environment and may require the Company to remove or
mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal or release of
petroleum or chemical substances at various sites. Environmental
expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their
future economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing
condition caused by past operations and that have no future
economic benefits are expensed. Liabilities for expenditures of
a noncapital nature are recorded when environmental assessment
and/or
remediation is probable, and the costs can be reasonably
estimated.
F-71
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The Companys operations are subject to all of the risks
inherent in oil and natural gas exploration, drilling and
production. These hazards can result in substantial losses to
the Company due to personal injury and loss of life, severe
damage to and destruction of property and equipment, pollution
or environmental damage, or suspension of operations. The
Company maintains insurance of various types customary in the
industry to cover its operations and believes it is insured
prudently against certain of these risks. In addition, the
Company maintains operators extra expense coverage that
provides coverage for the care, custody and control of wells
drilled by the Company. The Companys insurance does not
cover every potential risk associated with the drilling and
production of oil and natural gas. As a prudent operator, the
Company does maintain levels of insurance customary in the
industry to limit its financial exposure in the event of a
substantial environmental claim resulting from sudden and
accidental discharges. However, 100% coverage is not maintained.
The occurrence of a significant adverse event, the risks of
which are not fully covered by insurance, could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition and
results of operations. Moreover, no assurance can be given that
the Company will be able to maintain adequate insurance in the
future at rates it considers reasonable. The Company believes
that it operates in compliance with government regulations and
in accordance with safety standards which meet or exceed
industry standards.
Other
Property and Equipment
Other property and equipment includes furniture, fixtures, and
other equipment. Such assets are recorded at cost and are
depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the
straight-line method.
The Companys investment in Longfellow Ranch Field includes
an interest in a gas separation facility. This investment is
included in the oil and natural gas properties and depleted over
the life of the reserves.
Maintenance and repairs are charged against income when
incurred; renewals and betterments, which extend the useful
lives of property and equipment, are capitalized.
Income
Taxes
NEG Oil & Gas and Holding LLC are taxed as
partnerships under applicable federal and state laws. No income
taxes have been provided on the income of NEG Oil &
Gas since these taxes are the responsibility of the member.
Income tax liabilities and assets reflect the obligations and
assets of its consolidated entities.
National Onshore and National Offshore were organized as
corporations and were subject to corporate income tax until
their acquisition by NEG Oil & Gas. For income tax
purposes, through the date of acquisition by NEG Oil & Gas,
the taxable income or loss of National Onshore and its
subsidiaries and National Offshore are included in the
consolidated income tax return of the Starfire Holding Corp.
(Starfire) controlled group. National Onshore and
its subsidiaries and National Offshore entered into tax
allocation agreements with Starfire, an entity owned by
Mr. Icahn. The tax allocation agreements provide for
payments of tax liabilities to Starfire, calculated as if
National Onshore and its subsidiaries and National Offshore each
filed a consolidated income tax return separate from the
Starfire controlled group. Additionally, the agreements provide
for payments from Starfire to National Onshore and its
subsidiaries or National Offshore for any previously paid tax
liabilities that are reduced as a result of subsequent
determinations by any government authority, or as a result of
any tax losses or credits that are allowed to be carried back to
prior years.
The Company accounts for income tax assets and liabilities of
its consolidated corporate entities in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). SFAS 109 requires
the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
expected future tax consequences of temporary differences
between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing
assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax
F-72
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a
change in tax rates is recognized in the period that includes
the enactment date. The Company maintains valuation allowances
where it is determined more likely than not that all or a
portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Changes in
valuation allowances from period to period are included in the
Companys tax provision in the period of change. In
determining whether a valuation allowance is warranted, the
Company takes into account such factors as prior earnings
history, expected future earnings, carryback and carryforward
periods, and tax planning strategies.
Accounts
Receivable
The Company sells crude oil and natural gas to various
customers. In addition, the Company participates with other
parties in the operation of crude oil and natural gas wells.
Substantially all of the Companys accounts receivable are
due from either purchasers of crude oil and natural gas or
participants in crude oil and natural gas wells for which the
Company serves as the operator. Generally, operators of crude
oil and natural gas properties have the right to offset future
revenues against unpaid charges related to operated wells. Crude
oil and natural gas sales are generally unsecured.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate of the losses
in the Companys accounts receivable. The Company
periodically reviews the accounts receivable from customers for
any collectability issues. An allowance for doubtful accounts is
established based on reviews of individual customer accounts,
recent loss experience, current economic conditions, and other
pertinent factors. Accounts deemed uncollectible are charged to
the allowance. Provisions for bad debts and recoveries on
accounts previously charged-off are added to the allowance.
Accounts receivable allowance for bad debt totaled approximately
$0.3 million at December 31, 2004 and
$0.2 million at December 31, 2005. At
December 31, 2004 and 2005, the carrying value of the
Companys accounts receivable approximates fair value.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues from the sale of natural gas and oil produced are
recognized upon the passage of title, net of royalties.
Natural
Gas Production Imbalances
The Company accounts for natural gas production imbalances using
the sales method, whereby the Company recognizes revenue on all
natural gas sold to its customers notwithstanding the fact that
its ownership may be less than 100% of the natural gas sold.
Liabilities are recorded by the Company for imbalances greater
than the Companys proportionate share of remaining
estimated natural gas reserves. The Company has recorded a
liability for gas balancing of $0.9 million at
December 31, 2004 and $1.1 million at
December 31, 2005.
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a
business enterprise during a period from transactions and other
events and circumstances from non-owner sources. There were no
differences between net earnings and total comprehensive income
in 2003, 2004 and 2005.
F-73
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Derivatives
From time to time, the Company enters into various derivative
instruments consisting principally of no cost collar options
(the Derivative Contracts) to reduce its exposure to
price risk in the spot market for natural gas and oil. The
Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133 (SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, which was amended by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 138,
Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain
Hedging Activities. These pronouncements established accounting
and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for
hedging activities, which generally require recognition of all
derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet
at their fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value
depends on the intended use of the derivative and its resulting
designation. The Company elected not to designate these
instruments as hedges for accounting purposes, accordingly the
cash settlements and valuation gains and losses are included in
oil and natural gas sales. The following summarizes the cash
settlements and valuation gains and losses for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Realized loss (net cash payments)
|
|
$
|
8,309
|
|
|
$
|
16,625
|
|
|
$
|
51,263
|
|
Unrealized loss
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
|
9,179
|
|
|
|
69,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Derivative Contracts
|
|
$
|
11,296
|
|
|
$
|
25,804
|
|
|
$
|
120,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Companys Derivative
Contracts as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Contract
|
|
Production Month
|
|
|
Volume per Month
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
Ceiling
|
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
31,000 Bbls
|
|
|
$
|
41.65
|
|
|
$
|
45.25
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
16,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
41.75
|
|
|
|
45.40
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
570,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
7.25
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
120,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
7.28
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
500,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
46,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
60.00
|
|
|
|
68.50
|
|
(The Company participates in a second ceiling at $84.50 on the
46,000 Bbls)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
30,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
57.00
|
|
|
|
70.50
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
30,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
57.50
|
|
|
|
72.00
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
930,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
46,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
55.00
|
|
|
|
69.00
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
750,000 MmBtu
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
While the use of derivative contracts can limit the downside
risk of adverse price movements, it may also limit future gains
from favorable movements. The Company addresses market risk by
selecting instruments whose value fluctuations correlate
strongly with the underlying commodity. Credit risk related to
derivative activities is managed by requiring minimum credit
standards for counter parties, periodic settlements, and mark to
market valuations.
A liability of $16.7 million (including a current liability
of $8.9 million) and $85.9 million (including a
current liability of $68.0 million) was recorded by the
Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 respectively, in
connection with these contracts. As of December 31, 2004,
the Company had issued $11.0 million in letters of credit
securing the Companys derivative position. During 2005,
the Company was required to provide security to counter parties
for its Derivative Contracts in loss positions.
F-74
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
On December 22, 2005, concurrent with the execution of the
Companys new credit facility (see note 9) the
Company novated all of Derivative Contracts with Shell Trading
(US) outstanding as of that date with identical Derivative
Contracts with Citicorp (USA), Inc. as the counter party. Under
this transaction, no contracts were settled, Citicorp (USA)
replaced Shell Trading (US) as the counter party and no gain or
loss was recorded. Under the new credit facility, Derivatives
Contracts with certain lenders under the credit facility do not
require cash collateral or letters of credit and rank pari passu
with the credit facility. All cash collateral and letters of
credit have been released as of December 31, 2005.
Accounting
for Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company accounts for its asset retirement obligations under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143
(SFAS 143), Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.
SFAS 143 provides accounting requirements for costs
associated with legal obligations to retire tangible, long-lived
assets. Under SFAS 143, an asset retirement obligation is
recorded at fair value in the period in which it is incurred by
increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset.
In each subsequent period, the liability is accreted to its
present value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the
useful life of the related asset.
The Companys asset retirement obligation represents
expected future costs to plug and abandon its wells, dismantle
facilities, and reclamate sites at the end of the related
assets useful lives.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued Statement 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment that will
require compensation costs related to share-based payment
transactions (e.g., issuance of stock options and restricted
stock) to be recognized in the financial statements. With
limited exceptions, the amount of compensation cost will be
measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or
liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards will
be remeasured each reporting period. Compensation cost will be
recognized over the period that an employee provides service in
exchange for the award. Statement 123(R) replaces
SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees. For us, SFAS 123(R) is
effective for the first reporting period beginning after
June 15, 2005. Entities that use the fair-value-based
method for either recognition or disclosure under SFAS 123
are required to apply SFAS 123(R)using a modified version
of prospective application. Under this method, an entity records
compensation expense for all awards it grants after the date of
adoption. In addition, the entity is required to record
compensation expense for the unvested portion of previously
granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.
In addition, entities may elect to adopt SFAS 123(R)using a
modified retrospective method whereby previously issued
financial statements are restated based on the expense
previously calculated and reported in their pro forma footnote
disclosures. The Company had no share based payments subject to
this standard.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB
Opinion No. 29, to clarify the accounting for nonmonetary
exchanges of similar productive assets. SFAS 153 provides a
general exception from fair value measurement for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A
nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash
flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a
result of the exchange. The Statement will be applied
prospectively and is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges
occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005.
The Company does not have any nonmonetary transactions for any
period presented that this Statement would apply.
In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 143 (Interpretation). This Interpretation
clarifies
F-75
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
that the term conditional asset retirement obligation as used in
FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset
retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of
settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not
be within the control of the entity. The obligation to perform
the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though
uncertainty exists about the timing and (or) method of
settlement. Thus, the timing and (or) method of settlement may
be conditional on a future event. Accordingly, an entity is
required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a
conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the
liability can be reasonably estimated. This Interpretation also
clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to
reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement
obligation. This Interpretation is effective for the
Companys year ended December 31, 2005. The adoption
of this Interpretation did not impact the Companys
combined financial position or results of operations.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion
No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3
(SFAS No. 154). SFAS No. 154
requires retrospective application to prior period financial
statements for changes in accounting principle, unless it is
impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or
the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 also
requires that retrospective application of a change in
accounting principle be limited to the direct effects of the
change. Indirect effects of a change in accounting principle
should be recognized in the period of the accounting change.
SFAS No. 154 will become effective for the
Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006. The
impact of SFAS No. 154 will depend on the nature and
extent of any voluntary accounting changes and correction of
errors after the effective date, but management does not
currently expect SFAS No. 154 to have a material
impact on the Companys combined financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
On February 16, 2006, the FASB issued Statement 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. The
statement amends Statement 133 to permit fair value
measurement for certain hybrid financial instruments that
contain an embedded derivative, provides additional guidance on
the applicability of Statement 133 and 140 to certain
financial instruments and subordinated concentrations of credit
risk. The new standard is effective for the first fiscal year
that begins after September 15, 2006 (January 1, 2007
for the Company). We have no hybrid instruments subject to this
standard.
The management and operation of Operating LLC is being
undertaken by National Energy Group pursuant to the Management
Agreement (the Operating LLC Management Agreement)
which Operating LLC entered into with National Energy Group.
However, neither National Energy Groups officers nor
directors control the strategic direction of Operating
LLCs oil and natural gas business, including oil and
natural gas drilling and capital investments, which are
controlled by the managing member of Holding LLC (NEG
Oil & Gas). The Operating LLC management agreement
provides that National Energy Group will manage Operating
LLCs oil and natural gas assets and business until the
earlier of November 1, 2006, or such time as Operating LLC
no longer owns any of the managed oil and natural gas
properties. National Energy Groups employees conduct the
day-to-day
operations of Operating LLCs oil and natural gas business,
and all costs and expenses incurred in the operation of the oil
and natural gas properties are borne by Operating LLC, although
the Operating LLC Management Agreement provides that the salary
of National Energy Groups Chief Executive Officer shall be
70% attributable to the managed oil and natural gas properties,
and the salaries of each of the General Counsel and Chief
Financial Officer shall be 20% attributable to the managed oil
and natural gas properties. In exchange for National Energy
Groups management services, Operating LLC pays National
Energy Group a management fee equal to 115% of the actual direct
and indirect administrative and reasonable overhead costs that
National Energy Group incurs in operating the oil and natural
gas
F-76
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
properties. National Energy Group or Operating LLC may seek to
change the management fee to within the range of 110%-115% as
such change is deemed warranted. However, both have agreed to
consult with each other to ensure that such administrative and
reasonable overhead costs attributable to the managed properties
are properly reflected in the management fee that is paid. In
addition, Operating LLC has agreed to indemnify National Energy
Group to the extent National Energy Group incurs any liabilities
in connection with National Energy Groups operation of the
assets and properties of Operating LLC, except to the extent of
National Energy Groups gross negligence or misconduct.
Operating LLC incurred $6.6 million, $6.2 million and
$5.6 million in general and administrative expenses for the
years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively
under this agreement.
On August 28, 2003, National Energy Group entered into a
management agreement to manage the oil and natural gas business
of National Onshore. The National Onshore management agreement
was entered in connection with a plan of reorganization for
National Onshore proposed by Thornwood Associates LP, an entity
affiliated with Carl C. Icahn (the National Onshore
Plan). On August 28, 2003, the United States
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas, issued an order
confirming the National Onshore Plan. NEG Oil & Gas
owns all of the reorganized National Onshore, which is engaged
in the exploration, production and transmission of oil and
natural gas, primarily in South Texas, including the Eagle Bay
field in Galveston Bay, Texas and the Southwest Bonus field
located in Wharton County, Texas. Bob G. Alexander and
Philip D. Devlin, National Energy Groups
President and CEO, and National Energy Groups Vice
President, Secretary and General Counsel, respectively, have
been appointed to the reorganized National Onshore Board of
Directors and act as the two principal officers of National
Onshore and its subsidiaries, Galveston Bay Pipeline Corporation
and Galveston Bay Processing Corporation. Randall D. Cooley,
National Energy Groups Vice President and CFO, has been
appointed Treasurer of reorganized National Onshore and its
subsidiaries.
The National Onshore Management Agreement provides that National
Energy Group shall be responsible for and have authority with
respect to all of the
day-to-day
management of National Onshore business, but will not function
as a Disbursing Agent as such term is defined in the National
Onshore Plan. As consideration for National Energy Group
services in managing the National Onshore business, National
Energy Group receives a monthly fee of $0.3 million. The
National Onshore Management Agreement is terminable
(i) upon 30 days prior written notice by National
Onshore, (ii) upon 90 days prior written notice by
National Energy Group, (iii) upon 30 days following
any day where High River designees no longer constitute the
National Onshore Board of Directors, unless otherwise waived by
the newly-constituted Board of Directors of National Onshore, or
(iv) as otherwise determined by the Bankruptcy Court. The
Company recorded $1.4 million, $4.7 million and
$4.8 million in general and administrative expenses for the
years ended December 31, 2003, and 2004 and 2005,
respectively, under this agreement.
On November 3, 2004, the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Texas issued an order effective
November 16, 2004 confirming a plan of reorganization for
National Offshore (National Offshore Plan). In
connection with the National Offshore Plan, National Energy
Group entered into a Management Agreement with National Offshore
(the National Offshore Management Agreement) pursuant to
the Bankruptcy Courts order confirming the effective date
of the National Offshore Plan. NEG Oil & Gas owns all
of the reorganized National Offshore. Mr. Bob G. Alexander,
National Energy Groups President and CEO, has been
appointed to the reorganized National Offshore Board of
Directors and acts as the reorganized National Offshores
President. Mr. Philip D. Devlin, National Energy
Groups Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, has
been appointed to serve in the same capacities for National
Offshore. Mr. Randall D. Cooley, National Energy
Groups Vice President and CFO, has been appointed as
Treasurer of the reorganized National Offshore. In exchange for
management services, National Energy Group receives a monthly
fee equal to 115% of the actual direct and indirect
administrative overhead costs that are incurred in operating and
administering the National Offshore oil and natural gas
properties. The Company recorded $0.7 million and
$4.2 million in
F-77
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
general and administrative expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively, under this
agreement.
Substantially concurrent with the Riata Energy purchase
transaction the management agreements will be terminated.
|
|
4.
|
Contributions
of National Onshore and National Offshore
|
National Onshore On August 28, 2003, the
effective date of the confirmation of National Onshores
bankruptcy plan, an entity affiliated with Mr. Icahn owned
89% of the outstanding shares of National Onshore. The assets
and liabilities of National Onshore were considered to have been
contributed to the Company on that date at the historical cost
of the entity affiliated with Mr. Icahn as follows (amounts
in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
Assets contributed
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
15,312
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
11,236
|
|
Drilling prepayments
|
|
|
505
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
186,288
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
214,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,761
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
6,038
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
10,158
|
|
Accounts payable other
|
|
|
27
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
Note payable to affiliate net of current maturities
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
Production payments net of current maturities
|
|
|
5,617
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,096
|
|
Income tax liability
|
|
|
27,926
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
3,381
|
|
Minority interest liability
|
|
|
7,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
98,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets contributed
|
|
$
|
116,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During June 2004, the entity affiliated with Mr. Icahn
acquired an additional 5.7% of the outstanding shares of
National Onshore from certain other stockholders at a cost of
approximately $2.2 million. The $2.2 million purchase
is recorded as a capital contribution from member in 2004. In
December 2004, the remaining 5.3% of National Onshore shares not
owned by the entity affiliated with Mr. Icahn was purchased
by National Onshore at a cost of $4.1 million. The share
repurchase is reflected as a purchase of membership interest in
2004. The difference between the purchase price for both
acquisitions and the minority interest liability was treated as
an adjustment to the historical cost basis which reduced the
full cost pool.
F-78
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
National Offshore Effective December 31,
2004, the Period of Common Control of National Offshore, the
following assets and liabilities were considered to have been
contributed to the Company (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Assets contributed
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
23,753
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
10,482
|
|
Drilling prepayments
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
128,673
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
23,519
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
193,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
11,235
|
|
Accounts payable affiliate
|
|
|
555
|
|
Current portion of note payable to affiliate
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
Prepayments from partners
|
|
|
652
|
|
Accrued interest affiliates
|
|
|
288
|
|
Income tax payable affiliate
|
|
|
156
|
|
Accounts payable revenue
|
|
|
716
|
|
Accounts payable other
|
|
|
10
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
903
|
|
Note payable to affiliate net of current maturities
|
|
|
32,571
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
49,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
102,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets contributed
|
|
$
|
91,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2005, the Company purchased an additional interest in
Longfellow Ranch for $31.9 million.
In October 2005, the Company executed a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire Minden Field assets near its existing
production properties in East Texas. This acquisition consists
of 3,500 acres with 17 producing wells and numerous
drilling opportunities. The purchase price was approximately
$85.0 million, which was subsequently reduced to
$82.3 million after purchase price adjustments, and the
transaction closed on November 8, 2005.
|
|
6.
|
Sale of
West Delta Properties
|
In March 2005, the Company sold its rights and interest in West
Delta 52, 54, and 58 to a third party in exchange for the
assumption of existing future asset retirement obligations on
the properties and a cash payment of $0.5 million. The
estimated fair value of the asset retirement obligations assumed
by the purchaser
F-79
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
was approximately $16.8 million. In addition, the Company
transferred to the purchaser approximately $4.7 million in
an escrow account that the Company had funded relating to the
asset retirement obligations on the properties. The full cost
pool was reduced by approximately $11.6 million and no gain
or loss was recognized on the transaction.
|
|
7.
|
Investments/Note Receivable
|
In January 2002, the Company acquired stock valued at
$49.95 million, which was sold at a gain of
$8.7 million in February 2002. In an unrelated transaction,
the Company completed a short sale of stock in November 2002 for
$10.4 million. At December 31, 2002, this short sale
position remained open and the
mark-to-market
value of such stock resulted in an unrealized loss of
$0.3 million. In January 2003, the Company settled this
position and recorded a loss of $1.0 million on the
transaction.
In October 2003, the Company committed to an investment of
$6.0 million in PetroSource Energy Company, LLC
(PetroSource). The Companys commitment was to
acquire 24.8% of the outstanding stock for a price of
$3.0 million and to advance $3.0 million as a
subordinated loan bearing 6% interest due in six years. The
Company initially purchased $1.8 million in stock and
funded $1.8 million of the loan in October 2003. In
February 2004, the Company purchased an additional
$1.2 million of stock and funded the remaining
$1.2 million loan commitment. PetroSource is in the
business of selling CO(2) and also owns pipelines and compressor
stations for delivery purposes. During 2004, PetroSource sold
additional equity shares which reduced the Companys
ownership to 20.63%. The Company recorded losses of
$0.1 million, $0.5 million, and $1.1 million in
2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively, as a result of accounting for
the PetroSource investment under the equity method. During 2005,
the Company invested an additional $0.5 million in
PetroSource stock. In December 2005, the Company sold its entire
investment in PetroSource, including the subordinate loan, for
total proceeds of $10.5 million and recorded a gain of
$5.5 million.
In April 2002, the Company entered into a revolving credit
commitment to extend advances to an unrelated third party. Under
the terms of the revolving credit arrangement, the Company
agreed to make advances from time to time, as requested by the
unrelated third party and subject to certain limitations, in an
amount up to $5.0 million. Advances made under the
revolving credit commitment bear interest at prime rate plus 2%
and are collateralized by inventory and receivables. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company determined that a portion of
the total outstanding advances of $1.3 million had been
impaired and recorded a loss of $0.8 million. As of
December 31, 2005, the Company determined that the majority
of the total outstanding advance of $1.27 million had been
impaired and recorded an additional loss of $0.5 million
bringing the total allowance to $1.26 million. The loss is
recorded as an impairment of note receivable and is included in
general and administrative expenses.
In connection with the National Offshore transaction, the
Company acquired restricted deposits aggregating
$23.5 million. The restricted deposits represent bank trust
and escrow accounts required to be set up by surety bond
underwriters and certain former owners of National
Offshores offshore properties. In accordance with
requirements of the U.S. Department of Interiors
Minerals Management Service (MMS), National Offshore
was required to put in place surety bonds
and/or
escrow agreements to provide satisfaction of its eventual
responsibility to plug and abandon wells and remove structures
when certain offshore fields are no longer in use. As part of
National Offshores agreement with the surety bond
underwriter or the former owners of the particular fields, bank
trust and escrow accounts were set up and funded based on the
terms of the escrow agreements. Certain amounts are required to
be paid upon receipt of proceeds from production.
F-80
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The restricted deposits include the following:
1. A $4.2 million escrow account for the East Breaks
109 and 110 fields set up in favor of the surety bond
underwriter who provides a surety bond to the MMS. The escrow
account is fully funded as of December 31, 2005.
2. A $6.9 million escrow account for the East Breaks
165 and 209 fields set up in favor of the surety bond
underwriter who provides a surety bond to the former owners of
the fields and the MMS. The escrow account is fully funded as of
December 31, 2005.
3. A $4.1 million escrow account set up in favor of a
major oil company. The Company is required to make additional
deposits to the escrow account in an amount equal to 10% of the
net cash flow (as defined in the escrow agreement) from the
properties that were acquired from the major oil company.
4. A $3.8 million escrow account that was required to
be set up by the bankruptcy settlement proceedings of National
Offshore. The Company is required to make monthly deposits based
on cash flows from certain wells, as defined in the agreement.
5. A $5.3 million escrow account required to be set up
by the MMS relating to East Breaks properties. The Company is
required to make quarterly deposits to the escrow account of
$0.8 million. Additionally, for some of the East Break
properties, the Company will be required to deposit additional
funds in the East Break escrow accounts, representing the
difference between the required escrow deposit under the surety
bond and actual escrow deposit balance at various points in time
in the future. Aggregate payments to the East Breaks escrow
accounts are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
3,200
|
|
2007
|
|
|
6,100
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys debt consists of credit facilities, notes
payable, note payable to affiliates and senior notes payable to
affiliates.
Credit
Facilities
The
Operating LLC Credit Facility
On December 29, 2003, Holding LLC entered into a Credit
Agreement (the Mizuho Facility) with certain
commercial lending institutions, including Mizuho Corporate
Bank, Ltd. as the Administrative Agent and the Bank of Texas,
N.A. and the Bank of Nova Scotia as Co-Agents.
The Credit Agreement provided for a loan commitment amount of up
to $145.0 million and a letter of credit commitment of up
to $15 million (provided, the outstanding aggregate amount
of the unpaid borrowings, plus the aggregate undrawn face amount
of all outstanding letters of credit shall not exceed the
borrowing base under the Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement
provided further that the amount available to the
F-81
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Operating LLC at any time was subject to certain restrictions,
covenants, conditions and changes in the borrowing base
calculation. In partial consideration of the loan commitment
amount, Operating LLC has pledged a continuing security interest
in all of its oil and natural gas properties and its equipment,
inventory, contracts, fixtures and proceeds related to its oil
and natural gas business.
At Operating LLCs option, interest on borrowings under the
Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate based upon either the
prime rate or the LIBOR rate plus, in each case, an applicable
margin that, in the case of prime rate loans, can fluctuate from
0.75% to 2.50% per annum. Fluctuations in the applicable
interest rate margins are based upon Operating LLCs total
usage of the amount of credit available under the Credit
Agreement, with the applicable margins increasing as Operating
LLCs total usage of the amount of the credit available
under the Credit Agreement increases.
At the closing of the Credit Agreement, Operating LLC borrowed
$43.8 million to repay $42.9 million owed by Operating
LLC to an affiliate of Mr. Icahn under the secured loan
arrangement which was then terminated and to pay administrative
fees in connection with this borrowing. Approximately
$1.4 million of loan issuance costs was capitalized in
connection with the closing of this transaction.
The Credit Agreement required, among other things, semiannual
engineering reports covering oil and natural gas properties, and
maintenance of certain financial ratios, including the
maintenance of a minimum interest coverage, a current ratio, and
a minimum tangible net worth.
NEG
Oil & Gas LLC Senior Secured Revolving Credit
Facility
On December 22, 2005, the Company entered into a credit
agreement, dated as of December 20, 2005, with Citicorp
USA, Inc., as administrative agent, Bear Stearns Corporate
Lending Inc., as syndication agent, and other lender parties
thereto (the NEG Credit Facility). The NEG Credit
Facility is secured by substantially all the assets of the
Company and its subsidiaries, has a five-year term and permits
payments and re-borrowings, subject to a borrowing base
calculation based on the proved oil and gas reserves of the
Company and its subsidiaries. Under the NEG Credit Facility, the
Company will be permitted to borrow up to $500 million, and
the initial borrowing base is set at $335 million. The
Company used a portion of the initial $300 million funding
under the NEG Credit Facility to purchase the Mizuho Facility.
On a combined basis, the Mizuho Facility is no longer
outstanding.
In consideration of each lenders commitment to make loans
under the NEG Credit Facility, the Company is required to pay a
quarterly commitment fee ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% of the
available borrowing base. Commitment fees are based upon the
facility utilization levels.
At the Companys option, borrowings under the NEG Credit
Facility bear interest at Base Rate or Euro Dollar Rate, as
defined in the borrowing agreement, plus, in each case, an
applicable margin that, in the case of Base Rate loans, can
fluctuate from 0.00% to 0.75% per annum, and, in the case
of Euro Dollar loans, can fluctuate from 1.00% to 1.75% per
annum. Fluctuations in the applicable interest rate margins are
based upon the Companys total usage of the amount of
credit available under the NEG Credit Facility, with the
applicable margins increasing as the Companys total usage
of the amount of the credit available under the NEG Credit
Facility increases. Base Rate and Euro Dollar Rate fluctuate
based upon Prime rate or LIBOR, respectively. At
December 31, 2005, the interest rate on the outstanding
amount under the credit facility was 6.44% and
$14.6 million was available for future borrowings.
NEG Credit Facility agreement requires, among other things,
semiannual engineering reports covering oil and natural gas
properties, limitation on distributions, and maintenance of
certain financial ratios, including maintenance of leverage
ratio, current ratio and a minimum tangible net worth. The
Company was in compliance with all covenants at
December 31, 2005.
F-82
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
In addition to purchasing the Mizuho Facility, the Company used
the proceeds from the NEG Credit Facility to (1) repay a
loan of approximately $85 million by AREP used to purchase
properties in the Minden Field; (2) pay a distribution of
$78.0 million, and (3) pay transaction costs.
Notes Payable
Notes payable consist of the following (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Notes payable to various prior creditors of National Onshore in
settlement of bankruptcy claims. The notes are generally payable
over a 30 month period with a stated interest rate of 6%;
however, the notes have been discounted to an effective rate of
10%
|
|
$
|
4,320
|
|
|
$
|
2,503
|
|
Note payable asset acquisition
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,403
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
Less Current maturities
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
(2,503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,642
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable
to Affiliates
Notes payable to affiliates consist of the following (amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
In connection with the National Onshore plan of reorganization,
on August 28, 2003, National Onshore entered into a note
agreement with an affiliate of Mr. Icahn. The note is a
term loan in the amount of $32.5 million and bears interest
at a rate of 10% per annum. Interest is payable semi-annually.
Annual principal payments in the amount of $5 million are
due on the first through fourth anniversary dates of the note
with the final principal payment of $12.5 million due on
the fifth anniversary date. The note is secured by substantially
all of the assets of National Onshore. On December 6, 2004,
AREP purchased the note from the affiliate of Mr. Icahn and
on June 30, 2005, contributed the note, excluding accrued
and unpaid interest, to the Company
|
|
$
|
27,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Note payable to an affiliate of Mr. Icahn arising from the
bankruptcy plan of National Offshore. The note bears interest at
Wall Street Journal LIBOR plus 4% (6.35% at December 31,
2004) and is payable in quarterly principal installments of
$1.4 million plus interest commencing March 31, 2005.
The loan was secured by substantially all of the assets of
National Offshore. On December 6, 2004, the note was
purchased by AREP from an affiliate of Mr. Icahn and on
June 30, 2005, the note, excluding accrued and unpaid
interest was contributed to the Company
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
65,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Current maturities
|
|
|
(10,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,071
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2005, the Company borrowed additional $25.0 million
from AREP and repaid $1.4 million. The remaining
outstanding balance of $23.6 million, excluding accrued and
unpaid interest, along with notes payable detailed above, were
contributed to the Company.
F-83
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Advance
from Affiliate
During 2005, AREP made unsecured non-interest bearing advance of
$49.8 million, payable on demand, to fund their drilling
programs as well as to fund derivative contract deposits, of
which $39.8 million were outstanding at December 31,
2005. The outstanding balance was repaid in January 2006.
Deferred
Loan Costs
The Company capitalized approximately $1.5 million in
external direct costs associated with the Credit Agreement which
was being amortized (approximately $0.05 million per month)
as deferred loan costs. Upon execution of the NEG Credit
Facility, the Company expensed the unamortized deferred loan
cost of $0.4 million relating to the Mizuho Facility in
December 2005.
Additionally, the Company capitalized $4.7 million in
external direct costs associated with the NEG Credit Facility
executed on December 22, 2005. The deferred costs will be
amortized over the term of the facility as additional interest
expense.
Five Year
Maturities
Aggregate annual maturities of debt for fiscal years 2006 to
2010 are as follows: 2006 $42.3 million;
2007 $0 million; 2008 $0;
2009 $0; 2010 $300.0 million.
National Onshore and National Offshore were organized as
corporations until their respective acquisitions by NEG
Oil & Gas LLC, and were subject to corporate taxes up
until the date of acquisition as part of a tax sharing agreement
with the Starfire, Inc. consolidated group. The Company accounts
for income taxes of National Onshore and National Offshore
according to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS 109). SFAS 109 requires the recognition of
deferred tax assets, net of applicable reserves, related to net
operating loss carryforwards and certain temporary differences.
The standard requires recognition of a future tax benefit to the
extent that realization of such benefit is more likely than not.
Otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied.
The (provision) benefit for U.S. federal income taxes
attributable to continuing operations is as follows (amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
(2,338
|
)
|
|
$
|
(404
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
14,953
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,615
|
|
|
$
|
(260
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-84
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The tax effect of significant differences representing net
deferred tax assets (the difference between financial statement
carrying values and the tax basis of assets and liabilities) for
the Company is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
National
|
|
|
National
|
|
|
|
Onshore
|
|
|
Offshore
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
21,434
|
|
|
|
14,917
|
|
AMT and other credit carryforwards
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
Property, plant & equipment undeveloped properties
|
|
|
64,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
2,217
|
|
|
|
8,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,884
|
|
|
|
23,816
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(49,793
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
40,091
|
|
|
|
23,816
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,943
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
40,091
|
|
|
$
|
21,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant & equipment developed properties
|
|
$
|
(52,890
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(52,890
|
)
|
|
|
(21,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset/(liabilities)
|
|
$
|
(12,799
|
)
|
|
$
|
592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, after the filing of prior years
amended returns, TransTexas Gas Corporation
(TransTexas) had net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $150.0 million, which begin expiring in 2020.
On April 6, 2005, TransTexas merged into National Onshore,
a limited partnership, resulting in the treatment of an asset
sale for tax purposes and subsequent liquidation into its parent
company. Pursuant to the asset sale, TransTexas utilized
approximately $75.0 million of its net operating loss
carryforwards on its final corporate tax return and the
remainder transferred to its parent company in the liquidation.
Additionally, upon the TransTexas merger into National Onshore,
the net deferred tax liabilities of approximately
$9.9 million were credited to equity, in accordance with
SFAS 109.
At December 31, 2004, Panaco, Inc. (Panaco) had
net operating loss carryforwards available for federal income
tax purposes of approximately $39.2 million, which begin
expiring in 2019. On June 30, 2005, pursuant to the Panaco
purchase agreement, Panaco merged into National Offshore LP. The
purchase was a non-taxable transaction resulting in the net
operating loss carryforwards remaining with the former Panaco
stockholders. Additionally, in accordance with SFAS 109,
for financial reporting purposes, the net deferred tax assets of
approximately $2.6 million were debited to equity.
F-85
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The reconciliation of income taxes computed at the
U.S. federal statutory tax rates to the provision (benefit)
for income taxes on income from continuing operations is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Income not subject to taxation
|
|
|
(39.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(31.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(44.0
|
)%
|
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(45.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48.5
|
)%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
During 2000 and 2001 National Energy Group entered into several
hedge contracts with Enron North America Corp (Enron
NAC). In 2001 Enron Corporation and many Enron Corporation
affiliates and subsidiaries, including Enron NAC filed for
protection under Chapter 11 of the US bankruptcy code. The
derivative contracts were subsequently contributed to Holding
LLC and then to Operating LLC. Operating LLC has filed a claim
for damages in the Enron NAC bankruptcy proceeding and our
designee has been appointed as a representative to the official
committee of unsecured creditors. The Companys claim is
unsecured. During 2005, we received $0.2 million in partial
settlement of our claims which was recorded in interest income
and other. In April 2006, we received an additional payment of
$1.0 million and we should receive additional distributions
from the Enron bankruptcy proceeding in accordance with its plan
of reorganization. We will record such additional payments, if
any, when the amounts are known.
Other than routine litigation incidental to its business
operations which are not deemed by the Company to be material,
there are no additional legal proceedings in which the Company,
is a defendant.
Environmental
Matters
The Companys operations and properties are subject to
extensive federal, state, and local laws and regulations
relating to the generation, storage, handling, emission,
transportation, and discharge of materials into the environment.
Permits are required for various of the Companys
operations, and these permits are subject to revocation,
modification, and renewal by issuing authorities. The
Companys operations are also subject to federal, state,
and local laws and regulations that impose liability for the
cleanup or remediation of property which has been contaminated
by the discharge or release of hazardous materials or wastes
into the environment. Governmental authorities have the power to
enforce compliance with their regulations, and violations are
subject to fines or injunctions, or both. The Company believes
that it is in material compliance with applicable environmental
laws and regulations. Noncompliance with such laws and
regulations could give rise to compliance costs and
administrative penalties. Management does not anticipate that
the Company will be required in the near future to expend
amounts that are material to the financial condition or
operations of the Company by reason of environmental laws and
regulations, but because such laws and regulations are
frequently changed and, as a result, may impose increasingly
strict requirements, the Company is unable to predict the
ultimate cost of complying with such laws and regulations.
|
|
12.
|
Asset
Retirement Obligation
|
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations (SFAS 143). The Company
adopted SFAS 143 on January 1, 2003 and recorded an
abandonment obligation of $3.0 million,
F-86
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
increased oil and natural gas properties $4.9 million and
recorded a cumulative transition gain of $1.9 million.
SFAS No. 143 requires the Company to record the fair
value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the
period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the
acquisition, construction, development,
and/or
normal use of the assets. It also requires the Company to record
a corresponding asset that is depreciated over the life of the
asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the asset
retirement obligation, the obligation will be adjusted at the
end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in
the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation. The
ARO assets are recorded on the balance sheet as part of the
Companys full cost pool and are included in the
amortization base for the purposes of calculating depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense. For the purpose of
calculating the ceiling test, the future cash outflows
associated with settling the ARO liability are excluded from the
computation of the discounted present value of estimated future
net revenues.
The following is a rollforward of the abandonment obligation as
of December 31, 2004 and 2005 (amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2004
|
|
$
|
6,745
|
|
Add: Accretion
|
|
|
593
|
|
Drilling additions
|
|
|
216
|
|
Panaco
|
|
|
49,538
|
|
Less: Revisions
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
56,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Accretion
|
|
$
|
3,019
|
|
Drilling additions
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
Less: Revisions
|
|
|
(2,813
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
(17,138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
41,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2002, the Company applied for high-cost/tight-gas
formation designation from the Railroad Commission of
Texas for a portion of the Companys South Texas
production. For qualifying wells, high-cost/tight-gas
formation production is either exempt from tax or taxed at
a reduced rate until certain capital costs are recovered. The
designation was approved in 2004 and was retroactive to the date
of initial production. During 2004, the Company recognized a
gain of approximately $4.5 million for the refund of prior
period severance taxes, for which the Companys severance
tax payments were reduced by approximately $3.2 million. At
December 31, 2004, accounts receivable includes
$1.3 million in prior period severance tax refunds all of
which was realized as reductions in severance tax payments in
2005.
F-87
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Crude Oil
and Natural Gas Producing Activities
|
Costs incurred in connection with the exploration, development,
and exploitation of the Companys crude oil and natural gas
properties for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and
2005 are as follows (amounts in thousands except depletion rate
per Mcfe):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Acquisition of properties
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
114,244
|
|
Properties contributed by member
|
|
|
186,289
|
|
|
|
128,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration costs
|
|
|
6,950
|
|
|
|
62,209
|
|
|
|
75,357
|
|
Development costs
|
|
|
34,012
|
|
|
|
52,765
|
|
|
|
124,305
|
|
Depletion rate per Mcfe
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
2.11
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
As of December 31, 2004 and 2005, all capitalized costs are
included in the full cost pool and are subject to amortization.
Revenues from individual purchasers that exceed 10% of crude oil
and natural gas sales are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Plains All American
|
|
$
|
15,667
|
|
|
$
|
19,857
|
|
|
$
|
41,345
|
|
Duke Energy
|
|
|
10,572
|
|
|
|
33,958
|
|
|
|
44,850
|
|
Kinder Morgan
|
|
|
5,787
|
|
|
|
18,005
|
|
|
|
14,402
|
|
Crosstex Energy Services, Inc.
|
|
|
9,228
|
|
|
|
5,081
|
|
|
|
22,790
|
|
Riata Energy, Inc.
|
|
|
30,672
|
|
|
|
29,846
|
|
|
|
52,300
|
|
Seminole Energy Services
|
|
|
7,216
|
|
|
|
19,568
|
|
|
|
27,315
|
|
Louis Dreyfus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,790
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Supplementary
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Reserve Information
(Unaudited)
|
The revenues generated by the Companys operations are
highly dependent upon the prices of, and demand for, oil and
natural gas. The price received by the Company for its oil and
natural gas production depends on numerous factors beyond the
Companys control, including seasonality, the condition of
the U.S. economy, foreign imports, political conditions in
other oil and natural gas producing countries, the actions of
the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and domestic
governmental regulations, legislation and policies.
The Company has made ordinary course capital expenditures for
the development and exploitation of oil and natural gas
reserves, subject to economic conditions. The Company has
interests in crude oil and natural gas properties that are
principally located onshore in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma,
Arkansas, Gulf Coast and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. The
Company does not own or lease any crude oil and natural gas
properties outside the United States.
In 2003 and 2004, estimates of the Companys reserves and
future net revenues were prepared by Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc., Prator Bett, LLC and
DeGolyer and MacNaughton. In 2005, estimates of the
Companys reserves and future net revenues were prepared by
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. and DeGolyer and
MacNaughton. Estimated proved net recoverable reserves as shown
below include only those quantities that can be expected to be
recoverable at prices and costs in effect at the balance sheet
dates under existing regulatory practices and with conventional
equipment and operating methods.
F-88
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
In 2003, extension and discovery reserve additions were largely
impacted by the successful drilling on the Longfellow Ranch.
Drilling on the Longfellow Ranch in 2003 extended field
producing boundaries as well as identifying deeper Caballos and
Devonian reservoirs not previously captured as proved reserves.
The drilling program in 2004 had continued success in the
Longfellow Ranch Area extending field boundaries along with the
discovery of two new fields. The East Texas Region in 2004
extended producing boundaries adding proved reserves for the
Cotton Valley Reservoir. A new field discovery in the Gulf Coast
area resulted in new reserves along with three extension wells.
In 2005, continued drilling in the West Texas Region, Longfellow
Ranch, and the East Texas Region, Cotton Valley development
resulted in 86% of the added extension and discovery gas
reserves. Changes in reserves associated with development
drilling have been accounted for in revisions of previous
estimates.
Proved developed reserves represent only those reserves expected
to be recovered through existing wells. Proved undeveloped
reserves include those reserves expected to be recovered from
new wells on undrilled acreage or from existing wells on which a
relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.
Net quantities of proved developed and undeveloped reserves of
natural gas and crude oil, including condensate and natural gas
liquids, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
|
( MMcf)
|
|
|
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
5,209
|
|
|
|
122,567
|
|
Reserves of TransTexas contributed by member
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
41,441
|
|
Sales of reserves in place
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
61,638
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
(2,729
|
)
|
Production
|
|
|
(976
|
)
|
|
|
(15,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
8,166
|
|
|
|
206,260
|
|
Reserves of Panaco contributed by member
|
|
|
5,204
|
|
|
|
25,982
|
|
Sales of reserves in place
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
50,226
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
9,810
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(1,484
|
)
|
|
|
(18,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
12,598
|
|
|
|
273,039
|
|
Purchase of reserves in place
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
94,937
|
|
Sales of reserves in place
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
(7,426
|
)
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
79,592
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
17,015
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(1,790
|
)
|
|
|
(28,107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
11,904
|
|
|
|
429,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
6,852
|
|
|
|
125,765
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
8,955
|
|
|
|
151,452
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
8,340
|
|
|
|
200,520
|
|
F-89
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating the
volumes of underground accumulations of oil and natural gas
which cannot be measured precisely. The accuracy of any reserve
estimates is a function of the quality of available data and of
engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Reserve
estimates prepared by other engineers might differ from the
estimates contained herein. Results of drilling, testing, and
production subsequent to the date of the estimate may justify
revision of such estimate. Future prices received for the sale
of oil and natural gas may be different from those used in
preparing these reports. The amounts and timing of future
operating and development costs may also differ from those used.
Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the
quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered.
The following is a summary of a standardized measure of
discounted net cash flows related to the Companys proved
crude oil and natural gas reserves. For these calculations,
estimated future cash flows from estimated future production of
proved reserves were computed using crude oil and natural gas
prices as of the end of each period presented. Future
development, production and net asset retirement obligations
attributable to the proved reserves were estimated assuming that
existing conditions would continue over the economic lives of
the individual leases and costs were not escalated for the
future.
The Company cautions against using the following data to
determine the fair value of its crude oil and natural gas
properties. To obtain the best estimate of fair value of the
crude oil and natural gas properties, forecasts of future
economic conditions, varying discount rates, and consideration
of other than proved reserves would have to be incorporated into
the calculation. In addition, there are significant
uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved
reserves and in projecting rates of production that impair the
usefulness of the data.
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
relating to proved crude oil and natural gas reserves are
summarized as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
|
$
|
2,203,900
|
|
|
$
|
4,891,094
|
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
(488,473
|
)
|
|
|
(1,029,393
|
)
|
Future development costs
|
|
|
(347,619
|
)
|
|
|
(527,399
|
)
|
Future income tax expense
|
|
|
(32,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows
|
|
|
1,334,829
|
|
|
|
3,334,302
|
|
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows
|
|
|
(563,549
|
)
|
|
|
(1,562,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
771,280
|
|
|
$
|
1,772,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-90
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following are the principal sources of change in the
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Beginning of Period
|
|
$
|
310,632
|
|
|
$
|
613,752
|
|
|
$
|
771,280
|
|
Purchases of reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,208
|
|
Contribution of reserves by member
|
|
|
101,804
|
|
|
|
75,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of reserves in place
|
|
|
(2,476
|
)
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
|
|
(34,820
|
)
|
Sales and transfers of crude oil and natural gas produced, net
of production costs
|
|
|
(74,186
|
)
|
|
|
(130,640
|
)
|
|
|
(205,838
|
)
|
Net changes in prices and production costs
|
|
|
76,655
|
|
|
|
16,686
|
|
|
|
408,909
|
|
Development costs incurred during the period and changes in
estimated future development costs
|
|
|
(76,545
|
)
|
|
|
(89,491
|
)
|
|
|
(150,639
|
)
|
Extensions and discoveries, less related costs
|
|
|
211,324
|
|
|
|
193,022
|
|
|
|
411,092
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,097
|
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
|
|
37,718
|
|
|
|
31,730
|
|
|
|
68,937
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
34,457
|
|
|
|
62,050
|
|
|
|
77,128
|
|
Changes in production rates (timing) and other
|
|
|
(5,631
|
)
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
(13,294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change
|
|
|
303,120
|
|
|
|
157,528
|
|
|
|
1,000,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
$
|
613,752
|
|
|
$
|
771,280
|
|
|
$
|
1,772,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During recent years, there have been significant fluctuations in
the prices paid for crude oil in the world markets. The net
weighted average prices of crude oil and natural gas at
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, used in the above table
were $29.14 and $41.80 and $57.28 per barrel of crude oil,
respectively, and $5.89, $5.93 and $9.59 per thousand cubic
feet of natural gas, respectively.
F-91
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND
SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
102,322
|
|
|
$
|
26,362
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
53,378
|
|
|
|
53,436
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Drilling prepayments
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
3,755
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,158
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9,798
|
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
168,789
|
|
|
|
103,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, at cost (full cost method)
|
|
|
1,229,923
|
|
|
|
1,409,776
|
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(488,560
|
)
|
|
|
(562,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and gas properties
|
|
|
741,363
|
|
|
|
847,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property and equipment
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
|
|
6,232
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(4,934
|
)
|
|
|
(5,173
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other property and equipment
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
24,267
|
|
|
|
30,713
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,787
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,842
|
|
|
|
8,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
940,356
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
18,105
|
|
|
$
|
20,058
|
|
Accounts payable revenue
|
|
|
11,454
|
|
|
|
9,759
|
|
Accounts payable affiliates
|
|
|
1,660
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
Current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance from affiliate
|
|
|
39,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayments from partners
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Accrued interest affiliates
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
Income tax payable affiliate
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
68,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
146,787
|
|
|
|
37,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Gas balancing
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
17,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
41,228
|
|
|
|
47,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
507,266
|
|
|
|
388,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members equity
|
|
|
433,090
|
|
|
|
618,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members equity
|
|
$
|
940,356
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-92
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC. AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC.,
BUT INCLUDING NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP
INTEREST
IN NEG HOLDING LLC
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2005 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales gross
|
|
$
|
193,633
|
|
|
$
|
208,800
|
|
Unrealized derivatives (losses) gains
|
|
|
(111,631
|
)
|
|
|
115,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues net
|
|
|
82,002
|
|
|
|
324,677
|
|
Plant revenues
|
|
|
4,707
|
|
|
|
5,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
86,709
|
|
|
|
330,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
19,632
|
|
|
|
26,817
|
|
Transportation and gathering
|
|
|
3,764
|
|
|
|
3,441
|
|
Plant and field operations
|
|
|
2,644
|
|
|
|
3,270
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
11,184
|
|
|
|
8,948
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
65,756
|
|
|
|
74,408
|
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
10,651
|
|
|
|
10,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
115,921
|
|
|
|
129,277
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(29,212
|
)
|
|
|
201,199
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,856
|
)
|
|
|
(16,738
|
)
|
Interest expense affiliate
|
|
|
(3,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
4,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(36,930
|
)
|
|
|
189,249
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
2,932
|
|
|
|
(2,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(33,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
187,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-93
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2005 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(33,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
187,106
|
|
Noncash adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,932
|
)
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
65,756
|
|
|
|
74,408
|
|
Unrealized derivative losses (gains)
|
|
|
111,631
|
|
|
|
(115,877
|
)
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
Amortization of note discount
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Equity in loss on investment
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income-restricted deposits
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
Amortization of note costs
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(9,270
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
Drilling prepayments
|
|
|
(1,616
|
)
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
Derivative deposit
|
|
|
(64,068
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
|
3,920
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(7,605
|
)
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
63,793
|
|
|
|
154,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition, exploration, and development costs
|
|
|
(183,479
|
)
|
|
|
(175,619
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Purchases of furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
Equity investment
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in restricted deposits
|
|
|
(3,538
|
)
|
|
|
(5,832
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(187,190
|
)
|
|
|
(181,707
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
Guaranteed payment to member
|
|
|
(7,989
|
)
|
|
|
(7,989
|
)
|
Equity contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,989
|
|
Proceeds from/repayment of affiliate borrowings
|
|
|
73,443
|
|
|
|
(39,800
|
)
|
Dividend payment to member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from credit facility
|
|
|
59,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on debt
|
|
|
(1,554
|
)
|
|
|
(2,530
|
)
|
Deferred equity costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
123,000
|
|
|
|
(48,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
(75,960
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
30,846
|
|
|
|
102,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
30,449
|
|
|
$
|
26,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
13,205
|
|
|
$
|
16,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-94
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN TOTAL MEMBERS EQUITY
Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2006
(2006 Amounts Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total members equity December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
433,090
|
|
Dividend distribution
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
Equity contribution
|
|
|
7,989
|
|
Guaranteed payment to member
|
|
|
(7,989
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
187,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total members equity September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
618,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-95
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Organization,
Basis of Presentation and Background
|
The accompanying combined financial statements present NEG
Oil & Gas LLC and subsidiaries excluding National
Energy Group, Inc., and the
103/4% Senior
Notes due from National Energy Group, Inc., but including
National Energy Group, Inc.s 50% interest in NEG Holding
LLC (collectively the Company). The Company is an
oil and gas exploration and production company engaged in the
exploration, development, production and operations of natural
gas and oil properties, primarily located in Texas, Oklahoma,
Arkansas and Louisiana (both onshore and in the Gulf of Mexico).
NEG Oil & Gas, LLC is wholly-owned by American Real
Estate Holdings Limited Partnership (AREH). AREH is
99% owned by American Real Estate Partners, L.P.
(AREP). AREP is a publicly traded limited
partnership that is majority owned by Mr. Carl C. Icahn.
NEG Oil & Gas LLC was formed on December 2, 2004
to hold the oil and gas investments of the Companys
ultimate parent company, AREP. As of September 30, 2006 the
Companys assets and operations consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
A 50.01% ownership interest in National Energy Group, Inc
(National Energy Group), a publicly traded oil and gas
management company. National Energy Groups principal asset
consists of its 50% membership interest in NEG Holding LLC
(Holding, LLC);
|
|
|
|
$148.6 million principal amount of
103/4% Senior
Notes due from National Energy Group (the
103/4% Senior
Notes).
|
|
|
|
A 50% managing membership interest in Holding, LLC;
|
|
|
|
The oil and gas operations of National Onshore LP; and
|
|
|
|
The oil and gas operations of National Offshore LP.
|
All of the above assets initially were acquired by entities
owned or controlled by Mr. Icahn and subsequently acquired
by AREP (through subsidiaries) in various purchase transactions.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
assets transferred between entities under common control are
accounted for at historical cost similar to a pooling of
interest and the financial statements are combined from the date
of acquisition by an entity under common control. The financial
statements include the results of operations, financial position
and cash flows of each of the above entities since its initial
acquisition by entities owned or controlled by Mr. Icahn
(the Period of Common Control).
On September 7, 2006, AREP signed a letter of intent to
sell NEG Oil & Gas LLC and subsidiaries, excluding
National Energy Group and the
103/4% Senior
Notes due from National Energy Group, but including National
Energy Groups 50% interest in Holding LLC to Riata Energy,
Inc., DBA Riata Energy, Inc. (Riata Energy) The
combined financial statements include the entities to be sold to
Riata Energy.
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited combined interim financial statements
have been prepared in accordance both with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America for interim
financial information, and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X
and are fairly presented. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, these financial statements contain all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary
to present fairly the financial position, results of operations
and cash
F-96
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
flows for the periods indicated. The preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from these
estimates. Our financial data for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006 should be read in conjunction
with our audited financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2005 including the notes thereto.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement 109
(FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return, including issues relating to financial statement
recognition and measurement. FIN 48 provides that the tax
effects from an uncertain tax position can be recognized in the
financial statements only if the position is
more-likely-than-not of being sustained if the
position were to be challenged by a taxing authority. The
assessment of the tax position is based solely on the technical
merits of the position, without regard to the likelihood that
the tax position may be challenged. If an uncertain tax position
meets the more-likely-than-not threshold, the
largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than
50 percent likely of being recognized upon ultimate
settlement with the taxing authority, is recorded. The
provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative
effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an
adjustment to opening retained earnings. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on its
financial statements.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). SAB 108 provides guidance on
how to evaluate prior period financial statement misstatements
for purposes of assessing their materiality in the current
period. If the prior period effect is material to the current
period, then the prior period is required to be corrected.
Correcting prior year financial statements would not require an
amendment of prior year financial statements, but such
corrections would be made the next time the company files the
prior year financial statements. Upon adoption, SAB 108
allows a one-time transitional cumulative effect adjustment to
retained earnings for corrections of prior period misstatements
required under this statement. SAB 108 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2006. The
adoption of SAB 108 is not expected to be material to the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
Background
National Energy Group, Inc In
February, 1999 National Energy Group was placed under
involuntary, court ordered bankruptcy protection. Effective
August 4, 2000 National Energy Group emerged from
involuntary bankruptcy protection with affiliates of
Mr. Icahn owning 49.9% of the common stock and
$165 million principal amount of debt securities
(Senior Notes). As mandated by National Energy
Groups Plan of Reorganization, Holding LLC was formed and
on September 1, 2001, National Energy Group contributed to
Holding LLC all of its oil and natural gas properties in
exchange for an initial membership interest in Holding LLC.
National Energy Group retained $4.3 million in cash. On
September 1, 2001, an affiliate of Mr. Icahn
contributed to Holding LLC oil and natural gas assets, cash and
a $10.9 million note receivable from National Energy Group
in exchange for the remaining membership interest, which was
designated the managing membership interest. Concurrently, in
September, 2001, but effective as of May 2001, Holding LLC
formed a 100% owned subsidiary, NEG Operating Company, LLC
(Operating LLC) and contributed all of its oil and
natural gas assets to Operating LLC.
In October 2003, AREP acquired all outstanding Senior Notes
($148.6 million principal amount at October 2003) and
5,584,044 shares of common stock of National Energy Group
from entities affiliated with Mr. Icahn for aggregate
consideration of approximately $148.1 million plus
approximately $6.7 million of accrued interest on the
Senior Notes. As a result of this transaction and the
acquisition by AREP of additional
F-97
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
shares of National Energy Group, AREP beneficially owned 50.01%
of the outstanding stock of National Energy Group and had
effective control. In June 2005, all of the stock of National
Energy Group and the $148.6 million principal amount of
Senior Notes owned by AREP was contributed to the Company and
National Energy Group became a 50.01% owned subsidiary. The
accrued, but unpaid interest on the $148.6 million
principal amount of Senior Notes was retained by AREP. National
Energy Group and the
103/4% Senior
Notes will be retained by AREP.
NEG Holding LLC On June 30, 2005,
AREP acquired the managing membership interest in Holding LLC
from an affiliate of Mr. Icahn for an aggregate
consideration of approximately $320 million and contributed
it to the Company. The membership interest acquired constituted
all of the membership interests other than the membership
interest already owned by National Energy Group. The combined
financial statements include the consolidation of the acquired
50% membership interest in Holding LLC, together with the 50%
membership interest owned by National Energy Group. The Period
of Common Control for Holding LLC began on September 1,
2001, the initial funding of Holding LLC.
The
Holding LLC Operating Agreement
Holding LLC is governed by an operating agreement effective
May 12, 2001, which provides for management and control of
Holding LLC by the Company and distributions to National Energy
Group and the Company based on a prescribed order of
distributions (the Holding LLC Operating Agreement).
Order of
Distributions
Pursuant to the Holding LLC Operating Agreement, distributions
from Holding LLC to National Energy Group and the Company shall
be made in the following order:
1. Guaranteed payments (Guaranteed Payments)
are to be paid to National Energy Group, calculated on an annual
interest rate of
103/4%
on the outstanding priority amount (Priority
Amount). The Priority Amount includes all outstanding debt
owed to NEG Oil & Gas, including the amount of
National Energy Groups
103/4% Senior
Notes. As of December 31, 2005, the Priority Amount was
$148.6 million. The Guaranteed Payments will be made on a
semi-annual basis.
2. The Priority Amount is to be paid to National Energy
Group. Such payment is to occur by November 6, 2006. This
did not occur November 6, 2006 due to the pending
transaction with Riata Energy as described above.
3. An amount equal to the Priority Amount and all
Guaranteed Payments paid to National Energy Group, plus any
additional capital contributions made by NEG Oil &
Gas, less any distributions previously made by Holding LLC to
NEG Oil & Gas, is to be paid to NEG Oil &
Gas.
4. An amount equal to the aggregate annual interest
(calculated at prime plus
1/2%
on the sum of the Guaranteed Payments), plus any unpaid interest
for prior years (calculated at prime plus
1/2%
on the sum of the Guaranteed Payments), less any distributions
previously made by Holding LLC to NEG Oil & Gas, is to
be paid to NEG Oil & Gas.
5. After the above distributions have been made, any
additional distributions will be made in accordance with the
ratio of NEG Oil & Gas and National Energy
Groups respective capital accounts. (Capital accounts as
defined in the Holding LLC Operating Agreement.)
F-98
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Redemption Provision
in the Holding LLC Operating Agreement
The Holding LLC Operating Agreement contains a provision that
allows the managing member (NEG Oil & Gas), at any
time, in its sole discretion, to redeem National Energy
Groups membership interest in Holding LLC at a price equal
to the fair market value of such interest determined as if
Holding LLC had sold all of its assets for fair market value and
liquidated.
Prior to closing the Riata Energy purchase transaction, AREP
will cause NEG Oil & Gas to exercise the redemption
provision and dividend the
103/4%
Senior Notes to AREP or enter into transactions with a similar
effect such that NEG Oil & Gas will own 100% of
Holding LLC and no longer own the
103/4% Senior
Notes receivable from National Energy Group. AREP will indemnify
NEG Oil & Gas for any costs associated with the
exercise of the redemption provision. The Holding LLC Operating
Agreement will be cancelled.
National Onshore LP On
November 14, 2002, National Onshore filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division.
National Onshores First Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization submitted by an entity affiliated with
Mr. Icahn, as modified on July 8, 2003 (the
National Onshore Plan), was confirmed by the
Bankruptcy Court on August 14, 2003 effective
August 28, 2003.
As of the effective date of the National Onshore Plan, an entity
affiliated with Mr. Icahn owned 89% of the outstanding
shares of National Onshore. During June 2004, the entity
affiliated with Mr. Icahn acquired an additional 5.7% of
the outstanding shares of National Onshore from certain other
stockholders. During December 2004, National Onshore acquired
the remaining 5.3% of the outstanding shares that were not owned
by an affiliate of Mr. Icahn. The difference between the
purchase price for both acquisitions and the minority interest
liability was treated as a purchase price adjustment which
reduced the full cost pool.
On December 6, 2004, AREP purchased from an affiliate of
Mr. Icahn $27.5 million aggregate principal amount, or
100%, of the outstanding term notes issued by National Onshore
(the National Onshore Notes). The purchase price was
$28.2 million, which equaled the principal amount of the
National Onshore Notes plus accrued unpaid interest. The notes
are payable annually in equal consecutive annual payments of
$5.0 million, with the final installment due
August 28, 2008. Interest is payable semi-annually in
February and August at the rate of 10% per annum.
On April 6, 2005, AREP acquired 100% of the outstanding
stock of National Onshore from entities owned by Mr. Icahn
for an aggregate consideration of $180 million. The
operations of National Onshore are considered to have been
contributed to the Company on August 28, 2003 at a
historical cost of approximately $116.3 million,
representing the historical basis in the assets and liabilities
of National Onshore of the entities owned by Mr. Icahn.
AREP contributed The National Onshore Notes, but not the accrued
and unpaid interest through the date of contribution, to the
Company on June 30, 2005. The Period of Common Control of
National Onshore began on August 28, 2003.
National Offshore LP On July 16,
2002, National Offshore filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in
the United States Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of
Texas. On November 3, 2004, the Bankruptcy Court entered a
confirmation order for the National Offshores Plan of
Reorganization (the National Offshore Plan). The
National Offshore Plan became effective November 16, 2004
and National Offshore began operating as a reorganized entity.
Upon emergence from bankruptcy, an entity controlled by
Mr. Icahn owned 100% of the outstanding common stock of
National Offshore.
On December 6, 2004, AREP purchased $38.0 million
aggregate principal amount of term loans issued by National
Offshore, which constituted 100% of the outstanding term loans
of National Offshore from an
F-99
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
affiliate of Mr. Icahn. On June 30, 2005, AREP
contributed the National Offshore term loan, but not the accrued
and unpaid interest through the date of contribution, to the
Company.
On June 30, 2005, AREP acquired 100% of the equity of
National Offshore from affiliates of Mr. Icahn for
consideration valued at approximately $125.0 million. The
Period of Common Control for National Offshore began on
November 16, 2004 when National Offshore emerged from
bankruptcy. The acquisition of National Offshore has been
recorded effective December 31, 2004. The historical cost
of approximately $91.6 million, representing the historical
basis in the assets and liabilities of National Offshore of the
affiliates of Mr. Icahn, was considered to have been
contributed to the Company on December 31, 2004.
The management and operation of Operating LLC is being
undertaken by National Energy Group pursuant to the Management
Agreement (the Operating LLC Management Agreement)
which Operating LLC entered into with National Energy Group.
However, neither National Energy Groups officers nor
directors control the strategic direction of Operating
LLCs oil and natural gas business, including oil and
natural gas drilling and capital investments, which are
controlled by the managing member of Holding LLC (NEG
Oil & Gas). The Operating LLC management agreement
provides that National Energy Group will manage Operating
LLCs oil and natural gas assets and business until the
earlier of December 15, 2006 (previously November 1,
2006, before the amendment of such agreement effective
October 30, 2006) or such time as Operating LLC no
longer owns any of the managed oil and natural gas properties.
National Energy Groups employees conduct the
day-to-day
operations of Operating LLCs oil and natural gas business,
and all costs and expenses incurred in the operation of the oil
and natural gas properties are borne by Operating LLC, although
the Operating LLC Management Agreement provides that the salary
of National Energy Groups Chief Executive Officer shall be
70% attributable to the managed oil and natural gas properties,
and the salaries of each of the General Counsel and Chief
Financial Officer shall be 20% attributable to the managed oil
and natural gas properties. In exchange for National Energy
Groups management services, Operating LLC pays National
Energy Group a management fee equal to 115% of the actual direct
and indirect administrative and reasonable overhead costs that
National Energy Group incurs in operating the oil and natural
gas properties. National Energy Group or Operating LLC may seek
to change the management fee to within the range of 110%-115% as
such change is deemed warranted. However, both have agreed to
consult with each other to ensure that such administrative and
reasonable overhead costs attributable to the managed properties
are properly reflected in the management fee that is paid. In
addition, Operating LLC has agreed to indemnify National Energy
Group to the extent National Energy Group incurs any liabilities
in connection with National Energy Groups operation of the
assets and properties of Operating LLC, except to the extent of
National Energy Groups gross negligence or misconduct.
Operating LLC incurred $3.7 million and $5.5 million
in general and administrative expenses for the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively
under this agreement.
On August 28, 2003, National Energy Group entered into a
management agreement to manage the oil and natural gas business
of National Onshore. The National Onshore management agreement
was entered in connection with a plan of reorganization for
National Onshore proposed by Thornwood Associates LP, an entity
affiliated with Carl C. Icahn (the National Onshore
Plan). On August 28, 2003, the United States
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas, issued an order
confirming the National Onshore Plan. NEG Oil & Gas
owns all of the reorganized National Onshore, which is engaged
in the exploration, production and transmission of oil and
natural gas, primarily in South Texas, including the Eagle Bay
field in Galveston Bay, Texas and the Southwest Bonus field
located in Wharton County, Texas. Bob G. Alexander and
Philip D. Devlin, National Energy Groups
President and CEO, and National Energy Groups Vice
President, Secretary and General Counsel, respectively, have
been appointed to the reorganized National Onshore Board of
Directors
F-100
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
and act as the two principal officers of National Onshore and
its subsidiaries, Galveston Bay Pipeline Corporation and
Galveston Bay Processing Corporation. Randall D. Cooley,
National Energy Groups Vice President and CFO, has been
appointed Treasurer of reorganized National Onshore and its
subsidiaries.
The National Onshore Management Agreement provides that National
Energy Group shall be responsible for and have authority with
respect to all of the
day-to-day
management of National Onshore business, but will not function
as a Disbursing Agent as such term is defined in the National
Onshore Plan. As consideration for National Energy Group
services in managing the National Onshore business, National
Energy Group receives a monthly fee of $0.3 million. The
National Onshore Management Agreement is terminable
(i) upon 30 days prior written notice by National
Onshore, (ii) upon 90 days prior written notice by
National Energy Group, (iii) upon 30 days following
any day where High River designees no longer constitute the
National Onshore Board of Directors, unless otherwise waived by
the newly-constituted Board of Directors of National Onshore, or
(iv) as otherwise determined by the Bankruptcy Court. The
Company recorded $3.5 million and $3.6 million in
general and administrative expenses for the nine month periods
ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively, under this
agreement.
On November 3, 2004, the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Texas issued an order effective
November 16, 2004 confirming a plan of reorganization for
National Offshore (National Offshore Plan). In
connection with the National Offshore Plan, National Energy
Group entered into a Management Agreement with National Offshore
(the National Offshore Management Agreement)
pursuant to the Bankruptcy Courts order confirming the
effective date of the National Offshore Plan. NEG
Oil & Gas owns all of the reorganized National
Offshore. Mr. Bob G. Alexander, National Energy
Groups President and CEO, has been appointed to the
reorganized National Offshore Board of Directors and acts as the
reorganized National Offshores President. Mr. Philip
D. Devlin, National Energy Groups Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary, has been appointed to serve in the same
capacities for National Offshore. Mr. Randall
D. Cooley, National Energy Groups Vice President and
CFO, has been appointed as Treasurer of the reorganized National
Offshore. In exchange for management services, National Energy
Group receives a monthly fee equal to 115% of the actual direct
and indirect administrative overhead costs that are incurred in
operating and administering the National Offshore oil and
natural gas properties. The Company recorded $2.9 million
and $4.1 million in general and administrative expenses for
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2006,
respectively, under this agreement.
Substantially concurrent with the Riata Energy purchase
transaction the management agreements will be terminated.
From time to time, the Company enters into various derivative
instruments consisting principally of no cost collar options
(the Derivative Contracts) to reduce its exposure to
price risk in the spot market for natural gas and oil. The
Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133 (SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, which was amended by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 138,
Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain
Hedging Activities. These pronouncements established
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments
and for hedging activities, which generally require recognition
of all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the
balance sheet at their fair value. The accounting for changes in
fair value depends on the intended use of the derivative and its
resulting designation. The Company elected not to designate
these instruments as hedges for accounting purposes, accordingly
the cash settlements and valuation gains and losses are included
in oil and
F-101
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
natural gas sales. The following summarizes the cash settlements
and valuation gains and losses for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Realized loss (net cash payments)
|
|
$
|
(19,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,014
|
)
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
(111,631
|
)
|
|
|
115,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on Derivative Contracts
|
|
$
|
(131,117
|
)
|
|
$
|
90,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Companys Derivative
Contracts as of September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Contract
|
|
Production Month
|
|
|
Volume per Month
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
Ceiling
|
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Oct-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
31,000 BBLS
|
|
|
$
|
41.65
|
|
|
$
|
45.25
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Oct-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
16,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
41.75
|
|
|
|
45.40
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Oct-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
570,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
7.25
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Oct-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
120,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
7.28
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Oct-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
500,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Oct-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
46,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
60.00
|
|
|
|
68.50
|
|
(The Company participates in a second ceiling at $84.50 on the
46,000 Bbls)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
30,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
57.00
|
|
|
|
70.50
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
30,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
57.50
|
|
|
|
72.00
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
930,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
1,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
65.00
|
|
|
|
87.40
|
(A)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
7,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
65.00
|
|
|
|
86.00
|
(A)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
330,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
9.60
|
|
|
|
12.10
|
(A)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
100,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
9.55
|
|
|
|
12.60
|
(A)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
46,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
55.00
|
|
|
|
69.00
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
750,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
9,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
65.00
|
|
|
|
81.25
|
(A)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
70,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
8.75
|
|
|
|
11.90
|
(A)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
270,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
|
|
11.45
|
(A)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
19,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
65.00
|
|
|
|
78.50
|
(A)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
26,000 Bbls
|
|
|
|
65.00
|
|
|
|
77.00
|
(A)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
330,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
7.90
|
|
|
|
10.80
|
(A)
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
580,000 MMBTU
|
|
|
|
7.90
|
|
|
|
11.00
|
(A)
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
On October 17, 2006 the Company terminated the derivative
contract. See Note 12. |
While the use of derivative contracts can limit the downside
risk of adverse price movements, it may also limit future gains
from favorable movements. The Company addresses market risk by
selecting instruments whose value fluctuations correlate
strongly with the underlying commodity. Credit risk related to
derivative activities is managed by requiring minimum credit
standards for counter parties, periodic settlements, and mark to
market valuations.
F-102
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
A liability of $85.9 million (including a current liability
of $68.0 million) and an asset of $29.9 million
(including a current asset of $14.1 million) was recorded
by the Company as of December 31, 2005 and
September 30, 2006, respectively, in connection with these
contracts. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had issued
$11.0 million in letters of credit securing the
Companys derivative position. During 2005, the Company was
required to provide security to counter parties for its
Derivative Contracts in loss positions.
On December 22, 2005, concurrent with the execution of the
companys new credit facility the Company novated all of
Derivative Contracts with Shell Trading (US) outstanding as of
that date with identical Derivative Contracts with Citicorp
(USA), Inc. as the counter party. Under this transaction, no
contracts were settled, Citicorp (USA) replaced Shell Trading
(US) as the counterparty and no gain or loss was recorded. Under
the new credit facility, Derivatives Contracts with certain
lenders under the credit facility do not require cash collateral
or letters of credit and rank pari passu with the credit
facility. All cash collateral and letters of credit have been
released as of December 31, 2005.
As a condition to closing the Riata purchase transaction, all
derivatives contracts will be terminated or assumed by AREP. See
Note 12.
On July 10, 2006, we acquired an additional interest in our
East Breaks 160 offshore block from BP America for approximately
$14.1 million which increased our interest in East Breaks
to approximately 66%. As a condition to closing the acquisition,
we were required to issue a $16.0 million letter of credit
to BP America to collaterize the potential plugging and
abandonment liability associated with the offshore block. The
purchase price was paid from cash on hand.
In March 2005, the Company purchased an additional interest in
Longfellow Ranch for $31.9 million.
In October 2005, the Company executed a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire Minden Field assets near its existing
production properties in East Texas. This acquisition consists
of 3,500 acres with 17 producing wells and numerous
drilling opportunities. The purchase price was approximately
$85.0 million, which was subsequently reduced to
$82.3 million after purchase price adjustments, and the
transaction closed on November 8, 2005.
|
|
5.
|
Sale of
West Delta Properties
|
In March 2005, the Company sold its rights and interest in West
Delta 52, 54, and 58 to a third party in exchange for the
assumption of existing future asset retirement obligations on
the properties and a cash payment of $0.5 million. The
estimated fair value of the asset retirement obligations assumed
by the purchaser was approximately $16.8 million. In
addition, the Company transferred to the purchaser approximately
$4.7 million in an escrow account that the Company had
funded relating to the asset retirement obligations on the
properties. The full cost pool was reduced by approximately
$11.6 million and no gain or loss was recognized on the
transaction.
|
|
6.
|
Investments/Note Receivable
|
In October 2003, the Company committed to an investment of
$6.0 million in PetroSource Energy Company, LLC
(PetroSource). The Companys commitment was to
acquire 24.8% of the outstanding stock for a price of
$3.0 million and to advance $3.0 million as a
subordinated loan bearing 6% interest due in six years. The
Company initially purchased $1.8 million in stock and
funded $1.8 million of the loan in October 2003. In
February 2004, the Company purchased an additional
$1.2 million of stock and funded the remaining
$1.2 million loan commitment. PetroSource is in the
business of selling
CO2
and also owns
F-103
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
pipelines and compressor stations for delivery purposes. During
2004, PetroSource sold additional equity shares which reduced
the Companys ownership to 20.63%. During 2005, the Company
invested an additional $0.5 million in PetroSource stock.
In December 2005, the Company sold its entire investment in
PetroSource, including the subordinate loan, for total proceeds
of $10.5 million and recorded a gain of $5.5 million.
In April 2002, the Company entered into a revolving credit
commitment to extend advances to an third party. Under the terms
of the revolving credit arrangement, the Company agreed to make
advances from time to time, as requested by the third party and
subject to certain limitations, in an amount up to
$5.0 million. Advances made under the revolving credit
commitment bear interest at prime rate plus 2% and are
collateralized by inventory and receivables. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company determined that a portion of
the total outstanding advances of $1.3 million had been
impaired and recorded a loss of $0.8 million. As of
December 31, 2005, the Company determined that the majority
of the total outstanding advance of $1.27 million had been
impaired and recorded an additional loss of $0.5 million
bringing the total allowance to $1.26 million.
In connection with the National Offshore transaction, the
Company acquired restricted deposits aggregating
$23.5 million. The restricted deposits represent bank trust
and escrow accounts required to be set up by surety bond
underwriters and certain former owners of National
Offshores offshore properties. In accordance with
requirements of the MMS, National Offshore was required to put
in place surety bonds
and/or
escrow agreements to provide satisfaction of its eventual
responsibility to plug and abandon wells and remove structures
when certain offshore fields are no longer in use. As part of
National Offshores agreement with the surety bond
underwriter or the former owners of the particular fields, bank
trust and escrow accounts were set up and funded based on the
terms of the escrow agreements. Certain amounts are required to
be paid upon receipt of proceeds from production.
The restricted deposits include the following at
September 30, 2006:
1. A $4.4 million escrow account for the East Breaks
109 and 110 fields set up in favor of the surety bond
underwriter who provides a surety bond to the MMS. The escrow
account was fully funded as of September 30, 2006.
2. A $7.0 million escrow account for the East Breaks
165 and 209 fields set up in favor of the surety bond
underwriter who provides a surety bond to the former owners of
the fields and the MMS. The escrow account was fully funded as
of September 30, 2006.
3. A $6.0 million escrow account set up in favor of a
major oil company. The Company is required to make additional
deposits to the escrow account in an amount equal to 10% of the
net cash flow (as defined in the escrow agreement) from the
properties that were acquired from the major oil company.
4. A $5.5 million escrow account that was required to
be set up by the bankruptcy settlement proceedings of National
Offshore. The Company is required to make monthly deposits based
on cash flows from certain wells, as defined in the agreement.
5. $7.8 million in escrow accounts required to be set
up by the MMS relating to East Breaks properties. The Company is
required to make quarterly deposits to the escrow accounts of
$0.8 million. Additionally, for some of the East Break
properties, the Company will be required to deposit additional
funds in the East Break escrow accounts, representing the
difference between the required escrow deposit
F-104
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
under the surety bond and actual escrow deposit balance at
various points in time in the future. Aggregate payments to the
East Breaks escrow accounts are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2006
|
|
|
800
|
|
2007
|
|
|
6,100
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys debt consists of credit facilities, notes
payable, note payable to affiliates and senior notes payable to
affiliates.
Credit
Facilities
The
Operating LLC Credit Facility
On December 29, 2003, Holding LLC entered into a Credit
Agreement (the Mizuho Facility) with certain
commercial lending institutions, including Mizuho Corporate
Bank, Ltd. as the Administrative Agent and the Bank of Texas,
N.A. and the Bank of Nova Scotia as Co-Agents.
The Credit Agreement provided for a loan commitment amount of up
to $145.0 million and a letter of credit commitment of up
to $15 million (provided, the outstanding aggregate amount
of the unpaid borrowings, plus the aggregate undrawn face amount
of all outstanding letters of credit shall not exceed the
borrowing base under the Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement
provided further that the amount available to the Operating LLC
at any time was subject to certain restrictions, covenants,
conditions and changes in the borrowing base calculation. In
partial consideration of the loan commitment amount, Operating
LLC has pledged a continuing security interest in all of its oil
and natural gas properties and its equipment, inventory,
contracts, fixtures and proceeds related to its oil and natural
gas business.
At Operating LLCs option, interest on borrowings under the
Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate based upon either the
prime rate or the LIBOR rate plus, in each case, an applicable
margin that, in the case of prime rate loans, can fluctuate from
0.75% to 2.50% per annum. Fluctuations in the applicable
interest rate margins are based upon Operating LLCs total
usage of the amount of credit available under the Credit
Agreement, with the applicable margins increasing as Operating
LLCs total usage of the amount of the credit available
under the Credit Agreement increases.
At the closing of the Credit Agreement, Operating LLC borrowed
$43.8 million to repay $42.9 million owed by Operating
LLC to an affiliate of Mr. Icahn under the secured loan
arrangement which was then terminated and to pay administrative
fees in connection with this borrowing. Approximately
$1.4 million of loan issuance costs was capitalized in
connection with the closing of this transaction.
The Credit Agreement required, among other things, semiannual
engineering reports covering oil and natural gas properties, and
maintenance of certain financial ratios, including the
maintenance of a minimum interest coverage, a current ratio, and
a minimum tangible net worth.
F-105
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
NEG
Oil & Gas LLC Senior Secured Revolving Credit
Facility
On December 22, 2005, NEG Oil & Gas entered into
a credit agreement, dated as of December 20, 2005, with
Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent, Bear Stearns
Corporate Lending Inc., as syndication agent, and other lender
parties thereto (the NEG Credit Facility). The NEG
Credit Facility is secured by substantially all the assets of
NEG Oil & Gas and its subsidiaries, has a five-year
term and permits payments and re-borrowings, subject to a
borrowing base calculation based on the proved oil and gas
reserves of the Company and its subsidiaries. Under the NEG
Credit Facility, the Company will be permitted to borrow up to
$500 million, and the initial borrowing base is set at
$335 million. The Company used a portion of the initial
$300 million funding under the NEG Credit Facility to
purchase the Operating LLC Credit Facility. On a combined basis,
the Operating LLC Credit Facility is no longer outstanding.
In consideration of each lenders commitment to make loans
under the NEG Credit Facility, the Company is required to pay a
quarterly commitment fee ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% of the
available borrowing base. Commitment fees are based upon the
facility utilization levels.
At the Companys option, borrowings under the NEG Credit
Facility bear interest at Base Rate or Euro Dollar Rate, as
defined in the borrowing agreement, plus, in each case, an
applicable margin that, in the case of Base Rate loans, can
fluctuate from 0.00% to 0.75% per annum, and, in the case
of Euro Dollar loans, can fluctuate from 1.00% to 1.75% per
annum. Fluctuations in the applicable interest rate margins are
based upon the Companys total usage of the amount of
credit available under the NEG Credit Facility, with the
applicable margins increasing as the Companys total usage
of the amount of the credit available under the NEG Credit
Facility increases. Base Rate and Euro Dollar Rate fluctuate
based upon Prime rate or LIBOR, respectively. At
September 30, 2006 the interest rate on the outstanding
amount under the credit facility was 7.38% and
$14.8 million was available for future borrowings.
NEG Credit Facility agreement requires, among other things,
semiannual engineering reports covering oil and natural gas
properties, limitation on distributions, and maintenance of
certain financial ratios, including maintenance of leverage
ratio, current ratio and a minimum tangible net worth. The
Company was in compliance with all covenants at
September 30, 2006.
In addition to purchasing the Operating LLC Credit Facility, the
Company used the proceeds from the NEG Credit Facility to
(1) repay a loan of approximately $85 million by AREP
used to purchase properties in the Minden Field; (2) pay a
distribution of $78.0 million, and (3) pay transaction
costs.
Notes Payable
Notes payable consist of the following (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Notes payable to various prior creditors of National Onshore in
settlement of bankruptcy claims. The notes are generally payable
over a 30 month period with a stated interest rate of 6%;
however, the notes have been discounted to an effective rate of
10%
|
|
$
|
2,503
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Less Current maturities
|
|
|
(2,503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-106
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Advance
from Affiliate
During 2005, AREP made unsecured non-interest bearing advance of
$49.8 million, payable on demand, to fund their drilling
programs as well as to fund derivative contract deposits, of
which $39.8 million were outstanding at December 31,
2005. The outstanding balance was repaid in January 2006.
National Onshore and National Offshore were organized as
corporations until their respective acquisitions by NEG
Oil & Gas, LLC, and were subject to corporate taxes up
until the date of acquisition as part of a tax sharing
arrangement with the Starfire, Inc. consolidated group. The
Company accounts for income taxes of National Onshore and
National Offshore according to Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS 109). SFAS 109 requires the recognition of
deferred tax assets, net of applicable reserves, related to net
operating loss carryforwards and certain temporary differences.
The standard requires recognition of a future tax benefit to the
extent that realization of such benefit is more likely than not.
Otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied.
In May 2006, the State of Texas enacted legislation that
replaces the taxable capital and earned surplus components of
its franchise tax with a new franchise tax that is based on
modified gross revenue. The new franchise tax becomes effective
beginning with the 2007 tax year. The current franchise tax
remains in effect through the end of 2006.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States, the new franchise tax is based on a measure
of income, and thus accounted for in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 Accounting
for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). The provisions of
SFAS 109 require recognition of the effects of the tax law
change in the period of enactment. During the nine month period
ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded an income
tax expense and a deferred tax liability of $2.1 million to
record effects of the change in Texas franchise law.
|
|
10.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
During the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, we
entered into four drilling contracts to provide us with drilling
rigs at specified drilling day rates. Due to previous
commitments of the drilling rig operators, we have not taken
delivery of the drilling rigs as of September 30, 2006. Our
future obligations, and the estimated year of expenditure, under
the drilling rig contracts are estimated as follows (dollar
amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Commitment as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
Expected Drilling Location
|
|
Contract Duration
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Onshore West Texas
|
|
|
Six wells (approximately 3 months
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,201
|
|
|
$
|
1,201
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Onshore East Texas
|
|
|
18 months
|
|
|
|
10,900
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
7,300
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
Onshore East Texas
|
|
|
18 months
|
|
|
|
10,900
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
7,300
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
Offshore
|
|
|
6 months
|
|
|
|
8,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,101
|
|
|
$
|
4,201
|
|
|
$
|
22,700
|
|
|
$
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2000 and 2001 National Energy Group entered into several
hedge contracts with Enron North America Corp (Enron
NAC). In 2001, Enron Corporation and many Enron
Corporation affiliates and subsidiaries, including Enron NAC
filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the US bankruptcy
code. The
F-107
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
derivative contracts were subsequently contributed to Holding
LLC and then to Operating LLC. Operating LLC has filed a claim
for damages in the Enron NAC bankruptcy proceeding and our
designee has been appointed as a representative to the official
committee of unsecured creditors. The Companys claim is
unsecured. We received $0.2 million and $1.0 million
for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and
2006, respectively, in partial settlement of our claims, which
was recorded in interest income and other. In October 2006, we
received an additional $.9 million.
The Company expects to receive additional distributions from the
Enron bankruptcy proceeding in accordance with its plan of
reorganization. We will record such additional payments, if any,
when the amounts are known.
Other than routine litigation incidental to its business
operations which are not deemed by the Company to be material,
there are no additional legal proceedings in which the Company,
is a defendant.
Environmental
Matters
The Companys operations and properties are subject to
extensive federal, state, and local laws and regulations
relating to the generation, storage, handling, emission,
transportation, and discharge of materials into the environment.
Permits are required for various of the Companys
operations, and these permits are subject to revocation,
modification, and renewal by issuing authorities. The
Companys operations are also subject to federal, state,
and local laws and regulations that impose liability for the
cleanup or remediation of property which has been contaminated
by the discharge or release of hazardous materials or wastes
into the environment. Governmental authorities have the power to
enforce compliance with their regulations, and violations are
subject to fines or injunctions, or both. The Company believes
that it is in material compliance with applicable environmental
laws and regulations. Noncompliance with such laws and
regulations could give rise to compliance costs and
administrative penalties. Management does not anticipate that
the Company will be required in the near future to expend
amounts that are material to the financial condition or
operations of the Company by reason of environmental laws and
regulations, but because such laws and regulations are
frequently changed and, as a result, may impose increasingly
strict requirements, the Company is unable to predict the
ultimate cost of complying with such laws and regulations.
|
|
11.
|
Asset
Retirement Obligation
|
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations (SFAS 143).
SFAS No. 143 requires the Company to record the fair
value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the
period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the
acquisition, construction, development,
and/or
normal use of the assets. It also requires the Company to record
a corresponding asset that is depreciated over the life of the
asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the asset
retirement obligation, the obligation will be adjusted at the
end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in
the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation. The
ARO assets are recorded on the balance sheet as part of the
Companys full cost pool and are included in the
amortization base for the purposes of calculating depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense. For the purpose of
calculating the ceiling test, the future cash outflows
associated with settling the ARO liability are excluded from the
computation of the discounted present value of estimated future
net revenues.
F-108
NEG
OIL & GAS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, EXCLUDING NATIONAL
ENERGY GROUP, INC.
AND THE
103/4%
SENIOR NOTES DUE FROM NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC., BUT
INCLUDING
NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP INC.S 50% MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN NEG
HOLDING LLC
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The following is a rollforward of the asset retirement
obligation as of December 31, 2005 and September 30,
2006 (amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
41,228
|
|
Add: Accretion
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
Drilling additions
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired properties
|
|
|
4,269
|
|
Less: Revisions
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
47,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a condition to closing the Riata Energy purchase transaction,
the Company is required to terminate or otherwise assign all
derivatives contracts to AREP. On October 17, 2006, the
Company terminated all of its derivatives contracts for 2009
production and some of it derivatives contracts relating to 2007
and 2008 production. The Company received $17.6 million in
cash upon termination of the contracts. No gain or loss was
recognized upon termination because the derivatives contracts
are recorded at fair market value.
F-109
ANNEX A
GLOSSARY
OF NATURAL GAS AND OIL TERMS
The following is a description of the meanings of some of the
natural gas and oil industry terms used in this prospectus.
2-D
seismic or
3-D
seismic. Geophysical data that depict the
subsurface strata in two dimensions or three dimensions,
respectively.
3-D seismic
typically provides a more detailed and accurate interpretation
of the subsurface strata than
2-D seismic.
Bbl. One stock tank barrel, or 42
U.S. gallons liquid volume, used in this prospectus in
reference to crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
Bcf. Billion cubic feet of natural gas.
Bcfe. Billion cubic feet equivalent,
determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl
of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
Boe. Barrels of oil equivalent, with six
thousand cubic feet of natural gas being equivalent to one
barrel of oil.
Btu or British thermal unit. The quantity of
heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by
one degree Fahrenheit.
Completion. The process of treating a drilled
well followed by the installation of permanent equipment for the
production of natural gas or oil, or in the case of a dry hole,
the reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency.
Condensate. Liquid hydrocarbons associated
with the production of a primarily natural gas reserve.
CO2. Carbon
Dioxide.
Developed acreage. The number of acres that
are allocated or assignable to productive wells or wells capable
of production.
Development well. A well drilled into a proved
natural gas or oil reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic
horizon known to be productive.
Dry hole. A well found to be incapable of
producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such that
proceeds from the sale of such production exceed production
expenses and taxes.
Environmental Assessment (EA). A study to
determine whether a federal action significantly affect the
environment, which federal agencies may be required by the
National Environmental Policy Act or similar state statutes to
undertake prior to the commencement of activities that would
constitute federal actions, such as natural gas and oil
exploration and production activities on federal lands.
Environmental Impact Statement. A more
detailed study of the environmental effects of a federal
undertaking and its alternatives than an EA, which may be
required by the National Environmental Policy Act or similar
state statutes, either after the EA has been prepared and
determined that the environmental consequences of a proposed
federal undertaking, such as natural gas and oil exploration and
production activities on federal lands, may be significant, or
without the initial preparation of an EA if a federal agency
anticipates that a proposed federal undertaking may
significantly impact the environment.
Exploratory well. A well drilled to find and
produce natural gas or oil reserves not classified as proved, to
find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be
productive of natural gas or oil in another reservoir or to
extend a known reservoir.
Field. An area consisting of either a single
reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to
the same individual geological structural feature
and/or
stratigraphic condition.
A-1
Gross acres or gross wells. The total acres or
wells, as the case may be, in which a working interest is owned.
High
CO2
gas. Natural gas that contains more than 10%
CO2
by volume.
Imbricate stacking. A geological formation
characterized by multiple layers lying lapped over each other.
MBbls. Thousand barrels of crude oil or other
liquid hydrocarbons.
Mcf. Thousand cubic feet of natural gas.
Mcf/d. Mcf per day.
Mcfe. Thousand cubic feet equivalent,
determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl
of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
MmBbls. Million barrels of crude oil or other
liquid hydrocarbons.
Mmboe. Million barrels of oil equivalent.
MBtu. Thousand British Thermal Units.
MmBtu. Million British Thermal Units.
Mmcf. Million cubic feet of natural gas.
Mmcf/d. Mmcf per day.
Mmcfe. Million cubic feet equivalent,
determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl
of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
Mmcfe/d. Mmcfe per day.
Net acres or net wells. The sum of the
fractional working interest owned in gross acres or gross wells,
as the case may be.
Plugging and abandonment. Refers to the
sealing off of fluids in the strata penetrated by a well so that
the fluids from one stratum will not escape into another or to
the surface. Regulations of all states require plugging of
abandoned wells.
Present value of future net revenues
(PV-10). The
present value of estimated future revenues to be generated from
the production of proved reserves, before income taxes,
calculated in accordance with SEC guidelines, net of estimated
production and future development costs, using prices and costs
as of the date of estimation without future escalation and
without giving effect to hedging activities, non-property
related expenses such as general and administrative expenses,
debt service and depreciation, depletion and amortization.
PV-10 is
calculated using an annual discount rate of 10%.
Productive well. A well that is found to be
capable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such
that proceeds from the sale of the production exceed production
expenses and taxes.
Prospect. A specific geographic area which,
based on supporting geological, geophysical or other data and
also preliminary economic analysis using reasonably anticipated
prices and costs, is deemed to have potential for the discovery
of commercial hydrocarbons.
Proved developed reserves. Has the meaning
given to such term in Rule 4-10(a)(3) of Regulation S-X, which
defines proved developed reserves as:
Proved developed oil and gas reserves are reserves that can be
expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing
equipment and operating methods. Additional oil and gas expected
to be obtained through the application of fluid injection or
other improved recovery techniques for supplementing the natural
forces and mechanisms of primary recovery should be included as
proved developed
A-2
reserves only after testing by a pilot project or after the
operation of an installed program has confirmed through
production response that increased recovery will be achieved.
Proved reserves. Has the meaning given to such
term in Rule 4-10(a)(2) of Regulation S-X, which defines proved
reserves as:
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of
crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids which geological
and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing
economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of
the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of
changes in existing prices provided only by contractual
arrangements, but not on escalations based upon future
conditions.
(i) Reservoirs are considered proved if economic
producibility is supported by either actual production or
conclusive formation test. The area of a reservoir considered
proved includes (A) that portion delineated by drilling and
defined by gas-oil and/or oil-water contacts, if any, and (B)
the immediately adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which
can be reasonably judged as economically productive on the basis
of available geological and engineering data. In the absence of
information on fluid contacts, the lowest known structural
occurrence of hydrocarbons controls the lower proved limit of
the reservoir.
(ii) Reserves which can be produced economically through
application of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid
injection) are included in the proved classification when
successful testing by a pilot project, or the operation of an
installed program in the reservoir, provides support for the
engineering analysis on which the project or program was based.
(iii) Estimates of proved reserves do not include the
following: (A) Oil that may become available from known
reservoirs but is classified separately as indicated additional
reserves; (B) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids,
the recovery of which is subject to reasonable doubt because of
uncertainty as to geology, reservoir characteristics, or
economic factors; (C) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas
liquids, that may occur in undrilled prospects; and (D) crude
oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may be recovered
from oil shales, coal, gilsonite and other such sources.
Proved undeveloped reserves. Has the meaning
given to such term in Rule 4-10(a)(4) of Regulation
S-X, which
defines proved undeveloped reserves as:
Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are
expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or
from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is
required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage shall
be limited to those drilling units offsetting productive units
that are reasonably certain of production when drilled. Proved
reserves for other undrilled units can be claimed only where it
can be demonstrated with certainty that there is continuity of
production from the existing productive formation. Under no
circumstances should estimates for proved undeveloped reserves
be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid
injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated,
unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual
tests in the area and in the same reservoir.
Pulling Units. Pulling units are used in
connection with completions and workover operations.
PV-10. See
Present value of future net revenues.
Rental Tools. A variety of rental tools and
equipment, ranging from trash trailers to blow out preventors to
sand separators, for use in the oil field.
Reservoir. A porous and permeable underground
formation containing a natural accumulation of producible
natural gas
and/or oil
that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is
separate from other reservoirs.
Roustabout Services. The provision of manpower
to assist in conducting oil field operations.
A-3
Standardized Measure or Standardized Measure of Discounted
Future Net Cash Flows. The present value of
estimated future cash inflows from proved natural gas and oil
reserves, less future development and production costs and
future income tax expenses, discounted at 10% per annum to
reflect timing of future cash flows and using the same pricing
assumptions as were used to calculate
PV-10.
Standardized Measure differs from
PV-10
because Standardized Measure includes the effect of future
income taxes and asset retirement obligations on future net
revenues.
Stratigraphic play. An oil or natural gas
formation contained within an area created by permeability and
porosity changes characteristic of the alternating rock layer
that result from the sedimentation process.
Trucking. The provision of trucks to move our
drilling rigs from one well location to another and to deliver
water and equipment to the field.
Undeveloped acreage. Lease acreage on which
wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would
permit the production of commercial quantities of natural gas
and oil regardless of whether such acreage contains proved
reserves.
Working interest. The operating interest that
gives the owner the right to drill, produce and conduct
operating activities on the property and receive a share of
production and requires the owner to pay a share of the costs of
drilling and production operations.
A-4