UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

Commission File Number 0-22664

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(325) 574-6300

Securities Registered Pursuant to 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities Registered Pursuant to 12(g) of the Act:

(Title of class)

Common Stock, $.01 Par Value

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ         No o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes þ         No o

      The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2004, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $2,648,551,638, calculated by reference to the closing price of $16.67 for the common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on that date.

      As of February 24, 2005, the registrant had outstanding 168,651,600 shares of common stock, $.01 par value, its only class of voting common stock.

      Documents incorporated by reference:

      Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Part III).

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

      This Annual Report on Form 10-K/ A (including documents incorporated by reference herein) (the “Report”) contains statements with respect to our expectations and beliefs as to future events. These types of statements are “forward-looking” and subject to uncertainties. Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with our disclosures under the heading: “Forward Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements for Purposes of the ‘Safe Harbor’ Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995” beginning on page 18.

      This Annual Report on Form 10-K/ A, along with our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are available through our Internet website (www.patenergy.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

      This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/ A (“Form 10-K/ A”) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, initially filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 25, 2005 (“Original Filing”), reflects a restatement of our Consolidated Financial Statements as discussed in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Previously issued financial statements are being restated to properly reflect losses incurred as a result of an embezzlement whereby payments were made to or for the benefit of Jonathan D. Nelson (“Nelson”), our former Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), that had been reflected in previously issued financial statements as payments for assets and services that were not received by the Company. Previously issued financial statements are also being restated for the effects of the correction of other errors that are immaterial both individually and in the aggregate. These other adjustments relate primarily to previously reported property and equipment balances that result from our review of our property and equipment records and the underlying physical assets in connection with investigation of the embezzlement.

      The total amount embezzled was approximately $77.5 million in cash, excluding any tax effects, beginning with the year ended December 31, 1998 through November 3, 2005 as follows (in thousands):

      On November 16, 2005, the SEC obtained a freeze order on Nelson’s assets (including assets held by entities controlled by him) and a Receiver was appointed to collect those assets. The Company understands that the Receiver will ultimately liquidate the assets and propose a plan to distribute the proceeds. While the Company believes it has a claim for at least the full amount embezzled, other creditors have or may assert claims on the assets held by the Receiver. As a result, recovery by the Company from the Receiver is uncertain as to timing and amount, if any. Recoveries, if any, will be recognized when they are considered collectable.

      The effects of the embezzlement on the Company’s financial position follow (in thousands):

      The effects of the restatement due to the embezzlement and other adjustments on operating income as previously reported for 2004 and prior years, with no provision for potential recoveries, follow:

      The effects of the restatement due to the embezzlement and other adjustments on net income as previously reported for 2004 and prior years follow:

      The effects of the restatement due to the embezzlement and other adjustments on selected balance sheet data as previously reported for 2004 and prior years follow:

      The financial statements and related financial and statistical data contained in this Report have been restated to provide for, net of related tax effects, (1) the effects of losses incurred as a result of the embezzlement and (2) the effects of the correction of other errors that are immaterial both individually and in the aggregate.

      Management has reassessed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and has restated its report on internal control over financial reporting included as Item 9A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

      Except for the foregoing amended information, this Form 10-K/ A continues to speak as of the date of the Original Filing, and we have not updated the disclosure contained herein to reflect events that occurred at a later date.

PART I

Overview

      Based on publicly available information, we believe we are the second largest owner of land-based drilling rigs in North America. The Company was formed in 1978 and reincorporated in 1993 as a Delaware corporation. Our contract drilling business operates primarily in:

      As of December 31, 2004, we had a drilling fleet of 361 drilling rigs. A drilling rig includes the structure, power source and machinery necessary to cause a drill bit to penetrate earth to a depth desired by the customer.

      We provide pressure pumping services to oil and natural gas operators primarily in the Appalachian Basin. These services consist primarily of well stimulation and cementing for completion of new wells and remedial work on existing wells. We provide drilling fluids, completion fluids and related services to oil and natural gas operators in Texas, Southeastern New Mexico, Oklahoma, the Gulf Coast region of Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico. Drilling and completion fluids are used by oil and natural gas operators during the drilling process to control pressure when drilling oil and natural gas wells. We are also engaged in the development, exploration, acquisition and production of oil and natural gas. Our oil and natural gas operations are focused primarily in producing regions of West Texas, South Texas, Southeastern New Mexico, Utah and Mississippi.

Patterson/UTI Merger

      Patterson Energy, Inc. and UTI Energy Corp. consummated a merger on May 8, 2001. The transaction was treated as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and accounted for as a pooling of interests for financial accounting purposes. Historical financial statements and related financial and statistical data contained in this Report have been restated to provide for the retroactive effect of the merger.

Industry Segments

      Our revenues, operating results and identifiable operating assets are attributable to four industry segments:

      With respect to these four segments:

      See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as a part of Items 7 and 8, respectively, of this Report for financial information pertaining to these industry segments.

Contract Drilling Operations

      General — We market our contract drilling services to major and independent oil and natural gas operators. As of December 31, 2004, we owned 361 drilling rigs which were based in the following regions:

      Our drilling rigs have rated maximum depth capabilities ranging from 4,000 feet to 30,000 feet. Of our drilling rigs, 40 are SCR electric rigs and 321 are mechanical rigs. An electric rig differs from a mechanical rig in that the electric rig converts the diesel power (the sole energy source for a mechanical rig) into electricity to power the rig.

      Drilling rigs are typically equipped with:

      Over time, components on a drilling rig are replaced or rebuilt. We spend significant funds each year on an ongoing program to modify and upgrade our drilling rigs to ensure that our drilling equipment is well maintained and competitive. During fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, we spent approximately $141 million, $77 million and $60 million, respectively, on capital improvements to modify and upgrade our drilling rigs.

      Depth of the well and drill site conditions are the principal factors in determining the size of drilling rig used for a particular job. We use our rigs for developmental and exploratory drilling and they are capable of vertical or horizontal drilling.

      Our contract drilling operations depend on the availability of:

some of which have been in short supply from time to time.

      Drilling Contracts — Most of our drilling contracts are with established customers on a competitive bid or negotiated basis. Typically, the contracts are short-term to drill a single well or a series of wells.

      The drilling contracts obligate us to provide and operate a drilling rig and to pay certain operating expenses, including wages of drilling personnel and necessary maintenance expenses. The contracts are generally subject to termination by the customer on short notice. We generally indemnify our customers against claims by our employees and claims that might arise from surface pollution caused by spills of fuel, lubricants and other solvents within our control. The customers generally indemnify us against claims that might arise from other surface and subsurface pollution, except claims that might arise from our gross negligence.

      The contracts provide for payment on a daywork, footage, or turnkey basis, or a combination thereof. In each case, we provide the rig and crews. Our bid for each contract depends upon:

Daywork Contracts

      Under daywork contracts, we provide the drilling rig and crew to the customer. The customer supervises the drilling of the well. Our compensation is based on a contracted rate per day during the period the drilling rig is utilized. We generally receive a lower rate when the drilling rig is moving, or when drilling operations are interrupted or restricted by conditions beyond our control. In addition, daywork contracts typically provide separately for mobilization of the drilling rig.

Footage Contracts

      Under footage contracts, we contract to drill a well to a certain depth under specified conditions for a fixed price per foot. The customer provides drilling fluids, casing, cementing and well design expertise. These contracts require us to bear the cost of services and supplies that we provide until the well has been drilled to the agreed depth. If we drill the well in less time than estimated, we have the opportunity to improve our profits over those that would be attainable under a daywork contract. Profits are reduced and losses may be incurred if the well requires more days to drill to the contracted depth than estimated. Footage contracts generally contain greater risks for a drilling contractor than daywork contracts. Under footage contracts, the drilling contractor assumes certain risks associated with loss of the well from fire, blowouts and other risks.

Turnkey Contracts

      Under turnkey contracts, we contract to drill a well to a certain depth under specified conditions for a fixed fee. In a turnkey arrangement, we are required to bear the costs of services, supplies and equipment beyond those typically provided under a footage contract. In addition to the drilling rig and crew, we are required to provide the drilling and completion fluids, casing, cementing, and the technical well design and engineering services during the drilling process. We also assume certain risks associated with drilling the well such as fires, blowouts, cratering of the well bore and other such risks. Compensation occurs only when the agreed scope of the work has been completed which requires us to make larger up-front working capital commitments prior to receiving payments under a turnkey drilling contract. Under a turnkey contract, we have the opportunity to improve our profits if the drilling process goes as expected and there are no complications or time delays. However, given the increased exposure we have under a turnkey contract, profits can be significantly reduced and losses incurred if complications or delays occur during the drilling process. Turnkey contracts generally involve the highest degree of risk among the three different types of drilling contracts: daywork, footage and turnkey.

      Revenues by Contract Type — Information regarding our contract drilling activity for the last three years follows:

      Contract Drilling Activity — Information regarding our contract drilling activity for the last three years follows:

      Drilling Rigs and Related Equipment — Certain drilling rig information as of December 31, 2004 follows:

      At December 31, 2004, we owned 288 trucks and 360 trailers used to rig down, transport and rig up our drilling rigs. This reduces our dependency upon third parties for these services and enhances the efficiency of our contract drilling operations particularly in periods of high drilling rig utilization.

      Most repair and overhaul work to our drilling rig equipment is performed at our yard facilities located in Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Western Canada.

Pressure Pumping Operations

      General — We provide pressure pumping services to oil and natural gas operators primarily in the Appalachian Basin. Pressure pumping services are primarily well stimulation and cementing for the completion of new wells and remedial work on existing wells. Most wells drilled in the Appalachian Basin require some form of fracturing or other stimulation to enhance the flow of oil and natural gas by pumping fluids under pressure into the well bore. Generally, Appalachian Basin wells require cementing services before production commences. The cementing process inserts material between the wall of the well bore and the casing to center and stabilize the casing.

      Equipment — Our pressure pumping equipment at December 31, 2004 follows:

Drilling and Completion Fluids Operations

      General — We provide drilling fluids, completion fluids and related services to oil and natural gas operators in Texas, Southeastern New Mexico, Oklahoma, the Gulf Coast region of Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico. We serve our offshore customers through six stockpoint facilities located along the Gulf of Mexico in Texas and Louisiana and our land-based customers through eleven stockpoint facilities in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico.

      Drilling Fluids — Drilling fluid products and systems are used to cool and lubricate the bit during drilling operations, contain formation pressures (thereby minimizing blowout risk), suspend and remove rock cuttings from the hole and maintain the stability of the wellbore. Technical services are provided to ensure that the products and systems are applied effectively to optimize drilling operations.

      Completion Fluids — After a well is drilled, the well casing is set and cemented into place. At that point, the drilling fluid services are complete and the drilling fluids are circulated out of the well and replaced with completion fluids. Completion fluids, also known as clear brine fluids, are solids-free, clear salt solutions that have high specific gravities. Combined with a range of specialty chemicals, these fluids are used to control bottom-hole pressures and to meet specific corrosion, inhibition, viscosity and fluid loss requirements.

      Raw Materials — Our drilling and completion fluids operations depend on the availability of the following raw materials:

      We obtain these raw materials through purchases made on the spot market and supply contracts with producers of these raw materials.

      Barite Grinding Facility — We own and operate a barite grinding facility with two barite grinding mills in Houma, Louisiana. This facility allows us to grind raw barite into the powder additive used in drilling fluids.

      Other Equipment — We own 20 trucks and 71 trailers and lease another 22 trucks which are used to transport drilling and completion fluids and related equipment.

Oil and Natural Gas Operations

      General — We are engaged in the development, exploration, acquisition and production of oil and natural gas. Our oil and natural gas business operates primarily in producing regions of West Texas, South Texas, Southeastern New Mexico, Utah and Mississippi. We significantly expanded our oil and natural gas operations in 2004 through our acquisition of TMBR/ Sharp Drilling, Inc. (“TMBR”). The oil and natural gas assets acquired in the acquisition of TMBR included both proved reserves and undeveloped properties. Management is assessing the acquired undeveloped prospects and will make determinations as to the extent future capital will be expended to develop those prospects. We also selectively acquire leasehold acreage and producing properties.

      Oil and Natural Gas Reserves — Estimates, derived from reserve reports provided by M. Brian Wallace, an independent petroleum engineer, of our proved reserves and estimated future net revenues from our proved reserves as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are in the table below. The estimates were based upon production histories, current market prices for oil and natural gas, and other geologic, ownership and engineering data provided by us. The present values (discounted at 10% before income taxes) of estimated future net revenues shown in the table are not intended to represent the current market value of the estimated oil and natural gas reserves. For further information concerning the present value of estimated future net revenues from these proved reserves, see Note 21 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as a part of Item 8 of this Report.

      Proved oil and natural gas reserves are the estimated quantities of oil and natural gas which geological and engineering data demonstrate, with reasonable certainty, to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Reserves are considered proved if they are supported by either actual production or conclusive formation tests and future production is determined to be economical.

      A barrel (Bbl) of oil is 42 U.S. gallons and represents the basic unit for measuring production of crude oil and condensate.

      An Mcf of natural gas refers to a volume of 1,000 cubic feet under prescribed conditions of pressure and temperature and represents the basic unit for measuring volumes of produced natural gas. A barrel of equivalent (BOE) in reference to natural gas equivalents is determined using the rate of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl of crude oil or condensate.

      Production — At December 31, 2004, we held a working interest in 440 productive wells, of which 266 were considered oil and 174 were considered natural gas. A productive well is a well producing oil or natural gas in commercial quantities. A working interest is the operating interest under an oil or natural gas lease which gives the owner the right to explore for and produce oil or natural gas from the lease. We were the operator of 199 of these productive wells at December 31, 2004. The following table sets forth our average net oil and natural gas production, average sales price and average production costs. Production costs are costs incurred to operate and maintain our wells and related equipment. These costs include labor, well service and repair, utilities, field supervision, property taxes, production and severance taxes and related charges.

      Productive Wells — The number of productive wells in which we held a working interest as of December 31, 2004 are in the table below. One or more completions in the same well bore are reflected as one well.

      Developed and Undeveloped Acreage — Developed and undeveloped acreage in which we owned a working interest at December 31, 2004 follows:

      Undeveloped acreage is leased acres on which wells have not been drilled to a point that would permit production of commercial quantities of oil and natural gas. Developed acreage is leased acres that have been assigned to productive wells. Our gross acreage is the total number of acres in which we own a working

interest, regardless of the size of our working interest in the acreage. Our net acreage is the gross acreage proportionally reduced to our working interest percentage in the acreage.

      Many of our leases summarized in the table above as undeveloped acreage will expire at the end of their respective primary terms unless production has been obtained from the acreage prior to that date. If production is obtained, the lease will remain in effect until the cessation of production. Undeveloped acreage subject to leases summarized in the table above are scheduled to expire as follows:

      Drilling Activities — The results of our participation in the drilling of developmental and exploratory wells during 2004, 2003 and 2002 follows:

      In addition, we were participating in nine wells, 1.92 net, that were being drilled at December 31, 2004.

      Generally, a developmental well is a well that is drilled into an oil and natural gas reservoir that is known to be productive. An exploratory well is a well that is drilled to find oil and natural gas in an unproved area.

Customers

      The customers of each of our four business segments are oil and natural gas operators or purchasers of these commodities. Our customer base includes both major and independent oil and natural gas operators. During 2004, no single customer accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated operating revenues.

Competition

      Contract Drilling and Pressure Pumping Businesses — Our land drilling and pressure pumping businesses are highly competitive. Often times, available land drilling rigs and pressure pumping equipment exceed the demand for such equipment. The equipment can also be moved from one market to another in response to market conditions.

      Drilling and Completion Fluids Business — The drilling and completion fluids industry is highly competitive and price is generally the most important factor. Other competitive factors include the availability of chemicals and experienced personnel, the reputation of the fluids services provider in the drilling industry and relationships with customers. Some of our competitors have substantially more resources and longer operating histories than we have.

      Oil and Natural Gas Business — There is substantial competition for the acquisition of oil and natural gas leases suitable for development and exploration and for experienced personnel. Our competitors in this business include:

      Our ability to increase our oil and natural gas reserves in the future is directly dependent upon our ability to select, acquire and develop suitable prospects. Many of our competitors have facilities and financial and human resources greater than ours.

Government and Environmental Regulation

      All of our operations and facilities are subject to numerous Federal, state, foreign, and local laws, rules and regulations related to various aspects of our business, including:

      To date, applicable environmental laws and regulations have not required the expenditure of significant resources. We do not anticipate any material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities or extraordinary expenditures to comply with environmental rules and regulations in the foreseeable future. However, compliance costs under existing laws or under any new requirements could become material and we could incur liability in any instance of noncompliance.

      Our business is generally affected by political developments and by Federal, state, foreign, and local laws and regulations, which relate to the oil and natural gas industry. The adoption of laws and regulations affecting the oil and natural gas industry for economic, environmental and other policy reasons could increase costs relating to drilling and production. They could have an adverse effect on our operations. Several state and Federal environmental laws and regulations currently apply to our operations and may become more stringent in the future.

      We use operating and disposal practices that are standard in the industry. However, hydrocarbons and other materials may have been disposed of or released in or under properties currently or formerly owned or operated by us or our predecessors. In addition, some of these properties have been operated by third parties over whom we have no control of their treatment of hydrocarbon and other materials or the manner in which they may have disposed of or released such materials.

      The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, commonly known as CERCLA, and comparable state statutes impose strict liability on:

      The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), as amended, and comparable state statutes govern the disposal of “hazardous wastes.” Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from the definition of “hazardous substances,” and RCRA also excludes certain classes of exploration and production wastes from regulation, such exemptions by Congress under both CERCLA and RCRA may be deleted, limited, or modified in the future. If such changes are made to CERCLA and/or RCRA, we could be required to remove and remediate previously disposed of materials (including materials disposed of or released by prior owners or operators) from properties (including ground water contaminated with hydrocarbons) and to perform removal or remedial actions to prevent future contamination.

      The Federal Water Pollution Control Act and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, as amended, and implementing regulations govern:

      The Oil Pollution Act is more comprehensive and stringent than previous oil pollution liability and prevention laws. It imposes strict liability for a comprehensive and expansive list of damages from an oil spill into waters from facilities. Liability may be imposed for oil removal costs and a variety of public and private damages. Penalties may also be imposed for violation of Federal safety, construction and operating regulations, and for failure to report a spill or to cooperate fully in a clean-up.

      The Oil Pollution Act also expands the authority and capability of the Federal government to direct and manage oil spill clean-up and operations, and requires operators to prepare oil spill response plans in cases where it can reasonably be expected that substantial harm will be done to the environment by discharges on or into navigable waters. We have spill prevention control and countermeasure plans in place for our oil and natural gas properties in each of the areas in which we operate and for each of the stockpoints operated by our drilling and completion fluids business. Failure to comply with ongoing requirements or inadequate cooperation during a spill event may subject a responsible party, such as us, to civil or criminal actions. Although the liability for owners and operators is the same under the Federal Water Pollution Act, the damages recoverable under the Oil Pollution Act are potentially much greater and can include natural resource damages.

      Our operations are also subject to Federal, state and local regulations for the control of air emissions. The Federal Clean Air Act, as amended, and various state and local laws impose certain air quality requirements on us. Amendments to the Clean Air Act revised the definition of “major source” such that emissions from both wellhead and associated equipment involved in oil and natural gas production may be added to determine if a source is a “major source.” As a consequence, more facilities may become major sources and thus would be required to obtain operating permits. This permitting process may require capital expenditures in order to comply with permit limits.

Risks and Insurance

      Our operations are subject to the many hazards inherent in the drilling business, including:

      These hazards could cause:

      Damage to the environment, including property contamination in the form of either soil or ground water contamination, could also result from our operations, particularly through:

      In addition, we could become subject to liability for reservoir damages. The occurrence of a significant event, including pollution or environmental damages, could materially affect our operations and financial condition.

      As a protection against operating hazards, we maintain insurance coverage we believe to be adequate, including:

      We believe that we are adequately insured for public liability and property damage to others with respect to our operations. However, such insurance may not be sufficient to protect us against liability for all consequences of:

      We also carry insurance coverage for major physical damage to our drilling rigs. However, we do not carry insurance against loss of earnings resulting from such damage. In view of the difficulties that may be encountered in renewing such insurance at reasonable rates, no assurance can be given that:

      In addition to insurance coverage, we also attempt to obtain indemnification from our customers for certain risks. These indemnity agreements typically require our customers to hold us harmless in the event of loss of production or reservoir damage. These contractual indemnifications may not be supported by adequate insurance maintained by the customer.

Employees

      We employed approximately 6,800 full-time persons (300 office personnel and 6,500 field personnel) at December 31, 2004. The number of field employees fluctuates depending on the current and expected demand for our services. We consider our employee relations to be satisfactory. None of our employees are represented by a union.

Seasonality

      Seasonality does not significantly affect our overall operations. However, our pressure pumping division in Appalachia and our drilling operations in Canada are subject to slow periods of activity during the Spring thaw. In addition, our drilling operations in Canada are subject to slow periods of activity during the Fall.

Raw Materials and Subcontractors

      We use many suppliers of raw materials and services. These materials and services have historically been available, although there is no assurance that such materials and services will continue to be available on favorable terms or at all. We also utilize numerous independent subcontractors from various trades.

Incorporation by Reference

      The various factors disclosed under the caption “Forward Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements for Purposes of the ‘Safe Harbor’ Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,” beginning on page 18 of this Report, are incorporated by this reference into Items 1 and 2 of this Report. Readers of this Report should review those factors in conjunction with their review of Items 1 and 2.

Corporate Headquarters, Field Offices and Other Facilities

      Our corporate headquarters are located in Snyder, Texas. We also have a number of offices, yards and stockpoint facilities located in our various operating areas.

      Our corporate headquarters are located at 4510 Lamesa Highway, Snyder, Texas, and our telephone number at that address is (325) 574-6300. There are a number of improvements at our headquarters, including:

      We have regional administrative offices, yards and stockpoint facilities in many of the areas in which we operate. The facilities are primarily used to support day-to-day operations, including the repair and maintenance of equipment as well as the storage of equipment, inventory and supplies and to facilitate administrative responsibilities and sales.

      Contract Drilling Operations — Our drilling services are supported by several administrative offices and yard facilities located throughout our areas of operations including:

      Pressure Pumping — Our pressure pumping services are supported by several offices and yard facilities located throughout our areas of operations including:

      Drilling and Completion Fluids — Our drilling and completion fluids services are supported by several administrative offices and stockpoint facilities located throughout our areas of operations including:

      Oil and Natural Gas — Our oil and natural gas services are supported by administrative and field offices in Texas.

      We own our headquarters in Snyder, Texas, as well as several of our other facilities. We also lease a number of facilities and we do not believe that any one of the leased facilities is individually material to our operations. We believe that our existing facilities are suitable and adequate to meet our needs.

      We are party to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. We do not believe that the outcome of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

      None.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS AND CAUTIONARY

STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS

OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

      From time to time, we make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, our other filings with the SEC, press releases and reports to stockholders. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the “Safe Harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include, without limitation, statements relating to liquidity, financing of operations, sources and sufficiency of funds and impact of inflation. The words “believes,” “budgeted,” “expects,” “project,” “will,” “could,” “may,” “plans,” “intends,” “strategy,” or “anticipates,” and similar expressions are used to identify our forward-looking statements. We do not undertake to update, revise, or correct any of our forward-looking information.

      We include the following cautionary statement in accordance with the “Safe Harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for any forward-looking statement made by us, or on our behalf. The factors identified in this cautionary statement are important factors (but not necessarily all of the important factors) that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by us, or on our behalf. Where any such forward-looking statement includes a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying such forward-looking statement, we caution that, while we believe such assumptions or bases to be reasonable and make them in good faith, assumed facts or bases almost always vary from actual results. The differences between assumed facts or bases and actual results can be material, depending upon the circumstances.

      Where, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to the future results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, there can be no assurance that the statement of expectation or belief will result, or be achieved or accomplished. Taking this into account, the following are identified as important risk factors currently applicable to, or which could readily be applicable to, us:

      Our revenue, profitability and rate of growth are substantially dependent upon prevailing prices for oil and natural gas. For many years, oil and natural gas prices and, therefore, the level of drilling, exploration, development and production, have been extremely volatile. Prices are affected by:

      All of these factors are beyond our control. Natural gas prices fell from an average of $6.23 per Mcf in the first quarter of 2001 to an average of $2.51 per Mcf for the same period in 2002. During this same period, the average number of our rigs operating dropped by approximately 50%. The average market price of natural gas improved from $3.36 in 2002 to $5.45 in 2003 and $5.95 in 2004 resulting in an increase in demand for our drilling services. Our average number of rigs operating increased from 126 in 2002 to 188 in 2003 and to 211 in 2004. We expect oil and natural gas prices to continue to be volatile and to affect our financial condition and operations and ability to access sources of capital.

      The North American land drilling industry has experienced many downturns in demand over the last several years. During these periods, there have been substantially more drilling rigs available than necessary to meet demand. As a result, drilling contractors have had difficulty sustaining profit margins.

      In addition to adverse effects that future declines in demand could have on us, ongoing factors which could adversely affect utilization rates and pricing, even in an environment of high oil and natural gas prices and increased drilling activity, include:

      We cannot predict either the future level of demand for our contract drilling services or future conditions in the oil and natural gas contract drilling business.

      During periods of increased demand for drilling services, the industry has experienced shortages of drill pipe, replacement parts and other related rig equipment. These shortages can cause the price of these items to increase significantly and require that orders for the items be placed well in advance of expected use. These price increases and delays in delivery may require us to increase capital and repairs expenditures in our contract drilling segment. Severe shortages could impair our ability to operate our drilling rigs.

      Our land drilling and pressure pumping businesses are highly competitive. Often times, available land drilling rigs and pressure pumping equipment exceed the demand for such equipment. This excess capacity has resulted in substantial competition for drilling and pressure pumping contracts. The fact that drilling rigs and pressure pumping equipment are mobile and can be moved from one market to another in response to market conditions heightens the competition in the industry.

      We believe that price competition for drilling and pressure pumping contracts will continue for the foreseeable future due to the existence of available rigs and pressure pumping equipment.

      In recent years, many drilling and pressure pumping companies have consolidated or merged with other companies. Although this consolidation has decreased the total number of competitors, we believe the competition for drilling and pressure pumping services will continue to be intense.

      The drilling and completion fluids services industry is highly competitive. Price is generally the most important factor. Other competitive factors include the availability of chemicals and experienced personnel, the reputation of the fluids services provider in the drilling industry and relationships with customers. Some of our competitors have substantially more resources and longer operating histories than we have.

      During periods of increasing demand for contract drilling services, the industry experiences shortages of qualified drilling rig personnel. During these periods, our ability to attract and retain sufficient qualified personnel to market and operate our drilling rigs is adversely affected which negatively impacts both our operations and profitability. Operationally, it is more difficult to hire qualified personnel which adversely affects our ability to mobilize inactive rigs in response to the increased demand for our contract drilling services. Additionally, wage rates for drilling personnel are likely to increase, resulting in greater operating costs.

      We have increased our drilling rig fleet over the past several years through mergers and acquisitions. The land drilling industry has experienced significant consolidation over the past several years, and there can be no

assurance that acquisition opportunities will continue to be available. Additionally, we are likely to continue to face intense competition from other companies for available acquisition opportunities.

      There can be no assurance that we will:

      We may incur substantial indebtedness to finance future acquisitions and also may issue equity securities or convertible securities in connection with any such acquisitions. Debt service requirements could represent a significant burden on our results of operations and financial condition and the issuance of additional equity would be dilutive to existing stockholders. Also, continued growth could strain our management, operations, employees and other resources.

      Our operations are subject to many hazards inherent in the contract drilling, pressure pumping, and drilling and completion fluids businesses, which in turn could cause personal injury or death, work stoppage, or serious damage to our equipment. Our operations could also cause environmental and reservoir damages. We maintain insurance coverage and have indemnification agreements with many of our customers. However, there is no assurance that such insurance or indemnification agreements would adequately protect us against liability or losses from all consequences of the hazards. Additionally, there can be no assurance that insurance would be available to cover any or all of these risks, or, even if available, that insurance premiums or other costs would not rise significantly in the future, so as to make such insurance prohibitive.

      We have elected in some cases to accept a greater amount of risk through increased deductibles on certain insurance policies. For example, we maintain a $1.0 million per occurrence deductible on our workers’ compensation insurance and our general liability insurance coverages. These levels of self-insurance expose us to increased operating costs and risks.

      The drilling of oil and natural gas wells is subject to various Federal, state, foreign, and local laws, rules and regulations. The cost of compliance with these laws and regulations could be substantial. Failure to comply with these requirements could expose us to substantial civil and criminal penalties. In addition, Federal law imposes a variety of regulations on “responsible parties” related to the prevention of oil spills and liability for damages from such spills. As an owner and operator of land-based drilling rigs, we may be deemed to be a responsible party under Federal law. Our operations and facilities are subject to numerous state and Federal environmental laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, laws concerning the containment and disposal of hazardous substances, oil field waste and other waste materials, the use of underground storage tanks and the use of underground injection wells.

      A portion of our contract drilling is performed under turnkey and footage contracts, which involve significant risks. Under turnkey drilling contracts, we contract to drill a well to a certain depth under specified

conditions at a fixed price. Under footage contracts, we contract to drill a well to a certain depth under specified conditions at a fixed price per foot. The risk to us under these types of drilling contracts are greater than on a well drilled on a daywork basis. Unlike daywork contracts, we must bear the cost of services until the target depth is reached. In addition, we must assume most of the risk associated with the drilling operations, generally assumed by the operator of the well on a daywork contract, including blowouts, loss of hole from fire, machinery breakdowns and abnormal drilling conditions. Accordingly, if severe drilling problems are encountered in drilling wells under such contracts, we could suffer substantial losses.

      We are a Delaware corporation subject to the Delaware General Corporation Law, including Section 203, an anti-takeover law enacted in 1988. We have also enacted certain anti-takeover measures, including a stockholders’ rights plan. In addition, our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to one million shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights (including voting rights), conversion ratios, preferences and privileges of that stock without further vote or action by the holders of the common stock. As a result of these measures and others, potential acquirers might find it more difficult or be discouraged from attempting to effect an acquisition transaction with us. This may deprive holders of our securities of certain opportunities to sell or otherwise dispose of the securities at above-market prices pursuant to any such transactions.

PART II

      Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, is publicly traded on the Nasdaq National Market and is quoted under the symbol “PTEN.” Our common stock is included in the S&P MidCap 400 Index and several other market indexes. The following table provides high and low sales prices of our common shares for the periods indicated, adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split on June 30, 2004:

      As of January 24, 2005, there were approximately 940 holders of record and approximately 48,000 beneficial holders of our common shares.

      No dividend was declared or paid in 2003. On April 28, 2004, our Board of Directors approved the initiation of a quarterly cash dividend of $0.02 on each share of our common stock which was paid on June 2, 2004. Quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.02 per share were also paid on September 1, 2004 and December 1, 2004. Total cash dividends paid in 2004 were approximately $10 million. In February 2005, our Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend on our common stock to $0.04 per share form $0.02 per share. The next quarterly cash dividend is to be paid to holders of record on February 28, 2005 and paid on March 4, 2005. On April 28, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a two-for-one stock split in the form of a stock dividend which was distributed on June 30, 2004. The amount and timing of all future dividend payments is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon business conditions, results of operations, financial conditions, terms of our credit facilities and other factors.

      On June 7, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a stock buyback program for the purchase of up to $30 million of our outstanding common stock. Repurchases may be made from time to time as, in the opinion of management, market conditions warrant, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. We did not repurchase any of our shares in the fourth quarter of 2004.

      Equity compensation to our employees, officers and directors as of December 31, 2004 follows:

      This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, amends and restates the financial statements and related financial information for all years presented herein. The determination to restate these financial statements and other information was made as a result of management’s identification of an embezzlement. Further information on the restatement can be found in Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements included as a part of Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

      Our selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and for each of the five years then ended should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto, included as Items 7 and 8, respectively, of this Report. The historical financial data presented below, was previously reported as restated to provide for (i) the retroactive effect of the merger with UTI Energy Corp., on May  8, 2001 accounted for as a pooling of interest; (ii) the retroactive application of the equity method of accounting for our investment in TMBR and (iii) a two-for-one stock split that occurred in 2004. Certain reclassifications have been made to the historical financial data to conform with the 2004 presentation.

      This Item 7 contains forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the “Safe Harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

      This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, amends and restates the financial statements and related financial information for all years presented herein. The determination to restate these financial statements and other information was made as a result of management’s identification of an embezzlement. Further information on the restatement can be found in Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements included as a part of Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

      Management Overview — We are a leading provider of contract services to the North American oil and natural gas industry. Our services primarily involve the drilling, on a contract basis, of land-based oil and natural gas wells and to a lesser extent, we provide pressure pumping services and drilling and completion fluid services. In addition to the aforementioned contract services, we also engage in the development, exploration,

acquisition and production of oil and natural gas. For the three years ended December 31, 2004, our operating revenues consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

      We provide our contract services to oil and natural gas operators in many of the oil and natural gas producing regions of North America. Our contract drilling operations are focused in various regions of Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Mississippi, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and Western Canada while our pressure pumping services are focused primarily in the Appalachian Basin. Our drilling and completion fluids services are provided to operators in Texas, Southeastern New Mexico, Oklahoma, the Gulf Coast region of Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico. Our oil and natural gas operations are primarily focused in West Texas, South Texas, Southeastern New Mexico, Utah and Mississippi.

      We have been a leading consolidator of the land-based contract drilling industry over the past several years increasing our drilling fleet to 361 rigs as of December 31, 2004. Based on publicly available information, we believe we are the second largest owner of land-based drilling rigs in North America. Our most significant transaction occurred in May 2001 when we merged with UTI Energy Corp. in a merger of equals which basically doubled our drilling fleet and added the pressure pumping services business. Growth by acquisition has been a corporate strategy intended to expand both revenues and profits.

      The profitability of our business is most readily assessed by two primary indicators: our average number of rigs operating and our average revenue per operating day. During 2004, our average number of rigs operating increased to 211 from 188 in 2003 and our average revenue per operating day increased to $10,470 from $9,300 in 2003. Primarily due to these improved operating results, we experienced an increase of approximately $52 million in consolidated net income in 2004.

      Our revenues, profitability and cash flows are highly dependent upon the market prices of oil and natural gas. During periods of improved commodity prices, the capital spending budgets of oil and natural gas operators tend to expand, which results in increased demand for our contract services. Conversely, in periods of time when these commodity prices deteriorate, the demand for our contract services generally weakens and we experience downward pressure on pricing for our services. In addition, our operations are highly impacted by competition, the availability of excess equipment, labor issues and various other factors which are more fully described as risk factors in our “Forward Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements for Purposes of the ‘Safe Harbor’ Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995” contained on page 18 of this Report.

      Management believes that the liquidity of our balance sheet as of December 31, 2004, which includes approximately $235.5 million in working capital (including $112 million in cash), no long term debt and a $200 million line of credit with availability of $151 million (net of outstanding letters of credit totaling $49 million) provides us with the ability to pursue acquisition opportunities, expand into new regions, make improvements to our property and equipment and survive downturns in our industry.

      Commitments and Contingencies — We have no commitments or contingencies which require disclosure in our financial statements other than letters of credit of approximately $49 million at December 31, 2004, maintained for the benefit of various insurance companies as collateral for retrospective premiums and retained losses which may become payable under the terms of the underlying insurance contracts. No amounts have been drawn under the letters of credit.

      Net income for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 include embezzled funds expense of $19.1 million, $17.8 million and $8.6 million, respectively. On November 16, 2005, the SEC obtained a freeze order on Nelson’s assets (including assets held by entities controlled by him) and a Receiver was appointed to

collect those assets. The Company understands that the Receiver will ultimately liquidate the assets and propose a plan to distribute the proceeds. While the Company believes it has a claim for at least the full amount embezzled, other creditors have or may assert claims on the assets held by the Receiver. As a result, recovery by the Company from the Receiver is uncertain as to timing and amount, if any. Recoveries, if any, will be recognized when they are considered collectable. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2002, includes a charge of $4.7 million related to the financial failure in 2002 of a workers’ compensation insurance carrier that had provided coverage for us in prior years.

      Trading and investing — We have not engaged in trading activities that include high-risk securities, such as derivatives and non-exchange traded contracts. We invest cash primarily in highly liquid, short-term investments such as overnight deposits, money markets and highly rated municipal and commercial bonds.

      Description of business — We conduct our contract drilling operations in Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Mississippi, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and Western Canada. As of December 31, 2004, we owned 361 drilling rigs. We provide pressure pumping services to oil and natural gas operators primarily in the Appalachian Basin. These services consist primarily of well stimulation and cementing for completion of new wells and remedial work on existing wells. We provide drilling fluids, completion fluids and related services to oil and natural gas operators in Texas, Southeastern New Mexico, Oklahoma, the Gulf Coast region of Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico. Drilling and completion fluids are used by oil and natural gas operators during the drilling process to control pressure when drilling oil and natural gas wells. We are also engaged in the development, exploration, acquisition and production of oil and natural gas. Our oil and natural gas operations are focused primarily in producing regions in West Texas, South Texas, Southeastern New Mexico, Utah and Mississippi.

      The North American land drilling industry has experienced many downturns in demand over the last several years. During these periods, there have been substantially more drilling rigs available than necessary to meet demand. As a result, drilling contractors have had difficulty sustaining profit margins.

      In addition to adverse effects that future declines in demand could have on us, ongoing factors which could adversely affect utilization rates and pricing, even in an environment of stronger oil and natural gas prices and increased drilling activity, include:

      We cannot predict either the future level of demand for our contract drilling services or future conditions in the oil and natural gas contract drilling business.

Critical Accounting Policies

      In addition to established accounting policies, our consolidated financial statements are impacted by certain estimates and assumptions made by management. The following is a discussion of our critical accounting policies pertaining to property and equipment, oil and natural gas properties, goodwill, revenue recognition and the use of estimates.

      Property and equipment — Property and equipment, including betterments which extend the useful life of the asset, are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred. We provide for the depreciation of our property and equipment using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives. Our method of depreciation does not change when equipment becomes idle; we continue to depreciate idled equipment on a straight-line basis. No provision for salvage value is considered in determining depreciation of our property and equipment. We review our assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of certain assets either exceed their respective fair values or may not be recovered over their estimated remaining useful lives. The cyclical nature of our industry has resulted in fluctuations in rig utilization over periods of time. Management believes that the contract drilling industry will continue to be cyclical and rig utilization will fluctuate. Based on management’s expectations of future trends,

we estimate future cash flows in our assessment of impairment assuming the following four-year industry cycle: one year projected with low utilization, one year projected as a recovery period with improving utilization and the remaining two years projecting higher utilization. Provisions for asset impairment are charged to income when estimated future cash flows, on an undiscounted basis, are less than the asset’s net book value. Impairment charges are recorded based on discounted cash flows. There were no impairment charges to property and equipment during the years 2004, 2003 or 2002.

      Oil and natural gas properties — Oil and natural gas properties are accounted for using the successful efforts method of accounting. Under the successful efforts method of accounting, exploration costs which result in the discovery of oil and natural gas reserves and all development costs are capitalized to the appropriate well. Exploration costs which do not result in discovering oil and natural gas reserves are charged to expense when such determinations are made. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 19, “Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies,” (“SFAS No. 19”) costs of exploratory wells are initially capitalized to wells in progress until the outcome of the drilling is known. We review wells in progress quarterly to determine the related reserve classification. If the reserve classification is uncertain after one year following the completion of drilling, we consider the costs of the well to be impaired and recognize the costs as expense. Geological and geophysical costs, including seismic costs and costs to carry and retain undeveloped properties, are charged to expense when incurred. The capitalized costs of both developmental and successful exploratory type wells, consisting of lease and well equipment, lease acquisition costs and intangible development costs, are depreciated, depleted and amortized on the units-of-production method, based on engineering estimates of proved oil and natural gas reserves of each respective field. We review our proved oil and natural gas properties for impairment when an event occurs such as downward revisions in reserve estimates or decreases in oil and natural gas prices. Proved properties are grouped by field and undiscounted cash flow estimates are provided by an independent petroleum engineer. If the net book value of a field exceeds its undiscounted cash flow estimate, impairment expense is measured and recognized as the difference between its net book value and discounted cash flow. Unproved oil and natural gas properties are reviewed quarterly to determine impairment. Our intent to drill, lease expiration and abandonment of area are considered. Assessment of impairment is made on a lease-by-lease basis. If an unproved property is determined to be impaired, then costs related to that property are expensed. Impairment expense of approximately $3.2 million, $1.4 million and $700,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, is included in depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment in the accompanying financial statements.

      Goodwill — Goodwill is considered to have an indefinite useful economic life and is not amortized. As such, we assess impairment of our goodwill annually or on an interim basis if events or circumstances indicate that the fair value of the asset has decreased below its carrying value. With respect to our drilling and completion fluids business, the determination that no impairment existed as of December 31, 2004, was based on the segment’s improved operating results in 2004 and on our expectations that these improved results will continue. If the improved results do not continue, all or part of the goodwill of approximately $10 million associated with that business segment may be determined to be impaired.

      Revenue recognition — Revenues are recognized when services are performed, except for revenues earned under turnkey contract drilling arrangements which are recognized using the completed contract method of accounting, as described below. We follow the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for footage contract drilling arrangements. Under the percentage-of-completion method, management estimates are relied upon in the determination of the total estimated expenses to be incurred drilling the well. Due to the nature of turnkey contract drilling arrangements and risks therein, we follow the completed contract method of accounting for such arrangements. Under this method, revenues and expenses related to a well in progress are deferred and recognized in the period the well is completed. Provisions for losses on incomplete or in-process wells are made when estimated total expenses are expected to exceed estimated total revenues.

      In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-14, we recognize reimbursements received from third parties for out-of-pocket expenses incurred as revenues and account for out-of-pocket expenses as direct costs.

      Use of estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates.

      Key estimates used by management include:

      For additional information on our accounting policies, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as a part of Item 8 of this Report.

Related Party Transactions

      We operate certain oil and natural gas properties in which certain of our affiliated persons have participated, either individually or through entities they control, in the prospects or properties in which we have an interest. These participations, which have been on a working interest basis, have been in prospects or properties we originated or acquired. At December 31, 2004, affiliated persons were working interest owners in 237 of 300 total wells we operated. We make sales of working interests to reduce our economic risk in the properties. Generally, it is more efficient for us to sell the working interests to these affiliated persons than to market them to unrelated third parties. Sales of working interests were made at cost, including our costs of acquiring and preparing the working interests for sale. These costs were paid by the working interest owners on a pro rata basis based upon their working interest ownership percentage. The price at which working interests were sold to affiliated persons was the same price at which working interests were sold to unaffiliated persons.

      Production revenues and joint interest costs of each of the affiliated persons during 2004 for all wells operated by us in which the affiliated persons have working interests are presented in the table below. These amounts do not necessarily represent their profits or losses from these interests because the joint interest costs do not include the parties’ related drilling and leasehold acquisition costs incurred prior to January 1, 2004. These activities resulted in a payable to the affiliated persons of approximately $1.2 million and $871,000 and a

receivable from the affiliated persons of approximately $856,000 and $888,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      In 2004, 2003 and 2002, we paid approximately $914,000, $740,000 and $279,000, respectively, to TMP Truck and Trailer LP (“TMP”), an entity owned by Thomas M. Patterson (son of A. Glenn Patterson), for certain equipment and metal fabrication services. Purchases from TMP were at current market prices.

      In 2004 and 2003, we paid approximately $39,000 and $209,000, respectively, to Melco Services (“Melco”) for dirt contracting services and $44,000 and $59,000, respectively, to L&N Transportation (“L&N”) for water hauling services. Both entities are owned by Lance D. Nelson, brother of Jonathan D. Nelson. Purchases from Melco and L&N were at current market prices.

      See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as a part of Item 8 of this Report for information pertaining to fraudulent payments made to or for the benefit of Jonathan D. Nelson, our former CFO.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      As of December 31, 2004, we had working capital of $235.5 million including cash and cash equivalents of $112.4 million. For 2004, our sources of cash flow included:

      We used approximately $205.0 million:

      Additionally, $10.0 million was used to pay quarterly dividends on our common stock, $1.5 million was used to buy 100,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the stock buyback program authorized by our Board of Directors on June 7, 2004 and issuance costs of $780,000 were incurred during 2004 relating to our new $200 million credit facility. As of December 31, 2004, $1.8 million of cash was pledged as collateral for losses which could become payable under the terms of our workers’ compensation insurance contracts and was therefore restricted as to use.

      In February 2004, we completed the acquisition of TMBR in which one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries acquired 100% of the remaining outstanding shares of TMBR for a net cash payment of $32.5 million ($40.4 million paid to TMBR shareholders less $7.9 million in cash acquired in the transaction) and the issuance of 2.78 million shares of our common stock valued at $17.82 per share (adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split on June 30, 2004). The assets of TMBR included 18 land-based drilling rigs and related equipment, shop facilities, equipment yards and their oil and natural gas properties. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination and the purchase price was allocated among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair market values.

      We replaced our prior credit facility in December 2004 with a five-year, $200 million unsecured revolving line of credit (“LOC”). Interest is to be paid on outstanding LOC balances at a floating rate ranging from LIBOR plus 0.625% to 1.0% or the prime rate. This arrangement includes various fees, including a commitment fee on the average daily unused amount (0.15% at December 31, 2004). There are customary restrictions and covenants associated with the LOC. Financial covenants provide for a maximum debt to capitalization ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. We do not expect that the restrictions and covenants will restrict our ability to operate or react to opportunities that might arise. Availability under the LOC is reduced by outstanding letters of credit which totaled $49 million at December 31, 2004. There were no outstanding borrowings under the LOC at December 31, 2004. We incurred approximately $445,000 in costs to terminate the previous $100 million credit facility. These costs were expensed in 2004.

      In December 2004, we entered into an agreement to acquire the U.S. land drilling assets of Key Energy Services, Inc. for approximately $62 million. The assets include 25 active and 10 stacked land-based drilling rigs, related drilling equipment, four yard facilities and a rig moving fleet consisting of approximately 45 trucks and 100 trailers. This transaction was completed in January 2005 using approximately $62 million of cash.

      In February 2005, our Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend on the Company’s common stock to $0.04 per share from $0.02 per share. The next quarterly cash dividend is to be paid to holders of record on February 28, 2005 and paid on March 4, 2005.

      We believe that the current level of cash and short-term investments, together with cash generated from operations, should be sufficient to meet our capital needs. From time to time, acquisition opportunities are evaluated. The timing, size or success of any acquisition and the associated capital commitments are

unpredictable. Should opportunities for growth requiring capital arise, we believe we would be able to satisfy these needs through a combination of working capital, cash generated from operations, our existing credit facility and additional debt financing or equity financing. However, there can be no assurance that such capital would be available.

Results of Operations

      A summary of operations by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 follows:

      The market price of natural gas remained high in 2004. In fact, the average market price of natural gas improved to $5.95 per Mcf in 2004 compared to $5.45 per Mcf in 2003, resulting in an increase in demand for our contract drilling services. Our average number of rigs operating increased to 211 in 2004 from 188 in 2003. The average market price of natural gas and our average rigs operating for each of the fiscal quarters in 2004 and 2003 follow: