e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 2, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 1-5480
Textron Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
05-0315468 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
40 Westminster Street, Providence, RI
|
|
02903 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(401) 421-2800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 15, 2011, there were 277,332,707 shares of common stock outstanding.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEXTRON INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing revenues |
|
$ |
2,695 |
|
|
$ |
2,653 |
|
|
$ |
5,148 |
|
|
$ |
4,787 |
|
Finance revenues |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
2,728 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
5,207 |
|
|
|
4,919 |
|
|
Costs, expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
|
3,963 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
Provision for losses on finance receivables |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Total costs, expenses and other |
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
4,809 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
TEXTRON INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
$ |
898 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
5,441 |
|
|
|
5,047 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization of $3,040 and $2,869 |
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
Total Manufacturing group assets |
|
|
10,748 |
|
|
|
10,333 |
|
|
Finance group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Finance receivables held for investment, net |
|
|
3,345 |
|
|
|
3,871 |
|
Finance receivables held for sale |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
Total Finance group assets |
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
14,839 |
|
|
$ |
15,282 |
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
351 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
2,865 |
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
Total Manufacturing group liabilities |
|
|
8,065 |
|
|
|
7,933 |
|
|
Finance group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
Due to Manufacturing group |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
Debt |
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
Total Finance group liabilities |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
4,377 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
11,665 |
|
|
|
12,310 |
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
1,301 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
3,037 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
3,057 |
|
Less cost of treasury shares |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
3,174 |
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
14,839 |
|
|
$ |
15,282 |
|
|
Common shares outstanding (in thousands) |
|
|
277,224 |
|
|
|
275,739 |
|
|
See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
TEXTRON INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
Provision for losses on finance receivables held for investment |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Portfolio losses on finance receivables |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(217 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
Captive finance receivables, net |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Other operating activities, net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables originated or purchased |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
Finance receivables repaid |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
Proceeds on receivable sales |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
Net cash used in acquisitions |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets and properties |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term lines of credit |
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
Increase in short-term debt |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
(1,491 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Proceeds from option exercises |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(1,009 |
) |
|
|
(1,974 |
) |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(701 |
) |
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
651 |
|
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
See Notes to the consolidated financial statements
5
TEXTRON INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited) (Continued)
For the Six Months Ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing Group |
|
|
Finance Group |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from TFC |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution paid to TFC under Support Agreement |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Provision for losses on finance receivables held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Portfolio losses on finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
Other operating activities, net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables originated or purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(471 |
) |
Finance receivables repaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
Proceeds on receivable sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in acquisitions |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets and properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in short-term debt |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intergroup financing |
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Proceeds from option exercises |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions paid to TFC under Support Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Other capital contributions paid to Finance group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
(1,289 |
) |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
1,748 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
$ |
1,021 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6
TEXTRON INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Textron Inc. and its majority-owned
subsidiaries. We have prepared these unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for interim financial information.
Accordingly, these interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for complete financial statements.
The consolidated interim financial statements included in this quarterly report should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended January 1, 2011. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements
reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary for
the fair presentation of our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows
for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain prior period
amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
Our financings are conducted through two separate borrowing groups. The Manufacturing group
consists of Textron Inc. consolidated with its majority-owned subsidiaries that operate in the
Cessna, Bell, Textron Systems and Industrial segments. The Finance group, which also is the
Finance segment, consists of Textron Financial Corporation, its consolidated subsidiaries and three
other finance subsidiaries owned by Textron Inc. We designed this framework to enhance our
borrowing power by separating the Finance group. Our Manufacturing group operations include the
development, production and delivery of tangible goods and services, while our Finance group
provides financial services. Due to the fundamental differences between each borrowing groups
activities, investors, rating agencies and analysts use different measures to evaluate each groups
performance. To support those evaluations, we present balance sheet and cash flow information for
each borrowing group within the consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany
transactions are eliminated from the consolidated financial statements, including retail and
wholesale financing activities for inventory sold by our Manufacturing group and financed by our
Finance group.
Note 2: Special Charges
In 2010, special charges included restructuring costs incurred under a restructuring program that
was completed at the end of 2010. There were no special charges in the first half of 2011.
Restructuring costs by segment and type for the three and six months ended July 3, 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Costs |
|
|
Terminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Three Months Ended July 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cessna |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Textron Systems |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Finance |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
Six Months Ended July 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cessna |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Bell |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Textron Systems |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Finance |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
An analysis of our restructuring reserve activity is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Costs |
|
|
Terminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
Cash paid |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
Balance at July 2, 2011 |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
7
Note 3: Retirement Plans
We provide defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefits to eligible employees.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for these plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Than Pensions |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
Note 4: Comprehensive Income
Our comprehensive income, net of taxes, is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of prior service cost and unrealized
losses on pension and postretirement benefits |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Deferred gains on hedge contracts |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
Note 5: Earnings Per Share
We calculate basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) based on net income, which approximates
income available to common shareholders for each period. Basic earnings per share is calculated
using the two-class method, which includes the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
during the period and restricted stock units to be paid in stock that are deemed participating
securities as they provide nonforfeitable rights to dividends. Diluted earnings per share
considers the dilutive effect of all potential future common stock, including stock options,
restricted stock units and the shares that could be issued upon the conversion of our convertible
notes and upon the exercise of the related warrants. The convertible note call options purchased
in connection with the issuance of the convertible notes are excluded from the calculation of
diluted EPS as their impact is always anti-dilutive.
Upon conversion of our convertible notes, as described in Note 8, the principal amount would be
settled in cash and the excess of the conversion value, as defined, over the principal amount may
be settled in cash and/or shares of our common stock. Therefore, only the shares of our common
stock potentially issuable with respect to the excess of the notes conversion value over the
principal amount, if any, are considered as dilutive potential common shares for purposes of
calculating diluted EPS.
8
The weighted-average shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
277,406 |
|
|
|
274,098 |
|
|
|
276,882 |
|
|
|
273,636 |
|
Dilutive effect of convertible notes,
warrants, stock options and restricted stock
units |
|
|
37,802 |
|
|
|
28,299 |
|
|
|
40,379 |
|
|
|
28,133 |
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
315,208 |
|
|
|
302,397 |
|
|
|
317,261 |
|
|
|
301,769 |
|
|
Stock options to purchase 3 million shares of common stock outstanding are excluded from our
calculation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding for both the three- and six-month
periods ended July 2, 2011 as the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of our
common stock for the periods. Stock options to purchase 6 million shares of common stock
outstanding are excluded from our calculation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding for
both the three- and six-month periods ended July 3, 2010 as the exercise prices were greater than
the average market price of our common stock for the periods. These securities could potentially
dilute earnings per share in the future.
Note 6: Accounts Receivable and Finance Receivables
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable is composed of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
572 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
U.S. Government contracts |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
We have unbillable receivables on U.S. Government contracts that arise when the revenues we have
appropriately recognized based on performance cannot be billed yet under terms of the contract.
Unbillable receivables within accounts receivable totaled $165 million at July 2, 2011 and $195
million at January 1, 2011.
Finance Receivables
Finance receivables by product line, which includes both finance receivables held for investment
and finance receivables held for sale, are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
|
Aviation |
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Golf equipment |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Golf mortgage |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Timeshare |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Structured capital |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Other liquidating |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total finance receivables |
|
|
3,824 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4,626 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Less: Allowance for losses |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Finance receivables held for sale |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finance receivables held for investment, net |
|
$ |
3,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Indicators and Nonaccrual Finance Receivables
We internally assess the quality of our finance receivables held for investment portfolio based on
a number of key credit quality indicators and statistics such as delinquency, loan balance to
collateral value, the liquidity position of individual borrowers and guarantors, debt service
coverage in the golf mortgage product line and default rates of our notes receivable collateral in
the timeshare product line. Because many of these indicators are difficult to apply across an
entire class of receivables, we evaluate individual loans on a quarterly basis and classify these
loans into three categories based on the key credit quality indicators for the
individual loan. These three categories are performing, watchlist and nonaccrual.
We classify finance receivables held for investment as nonaccrual if credit quality indicators
suggest full collection is doubtful. In addition, we automatically classify accounts as nonaccrual
that are contractually delinquent by more than three
9
months unless collection is not doubtful. Cash payments on nonaccrual accounts, including finance charges, generally are
applied to reduce the net investment balance. We resume the accrual of interest when the loan
becomes contractually current through payment according to the original terms of the loan or, if a
loan has been modified, following a period of performance under the terms of the modification,
provided we conclude that collection of all principal and interest is no longer doubtful.
Previously suspended interest income is recognized at that time.
Accounts are classified as watchlist when credit quality indicators have deteriorated as compared
with typical underwriting criteria, and we believe collection of full principal and interest is
probable but not certain. All other finance receivables held for investment that do not meet the
watchlist or nonaccrual categories are classified as performing.
A summary of finance receivables held for investment categorized based on the internally assigned
credit quality indicators discussed above is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Performing |
|
|
Watchlist |
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Performing |
|
|
Watchlist |
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Aviation |
|
$ |
1,640 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
|
$ |
1,713 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
Golf equipment |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
Golf mortgage |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
Timeshare |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
Structured capital |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
Other liquidating |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,447 |
|
|
$ |
501 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
3,644 |
|
|
$ |
2,656 |
|
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
4,213 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
67.2 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.0 |
% |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
We measure delinquency based on the contractual payment terms of our loans and leases. In
determining the delinquency aging category of an account, any/all principal and interest received
is applied to the most past-due principal and/or interest amounts due. If a significant portion of
the contractually due payment is delinquent, the entire finance receivable balance is reported in
accordance with the most past-due delinquency aging category.
Finance receivables held for investment by delinquency aging category is summarized in the tables
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 Days |
|
|
31-60 Days |
|
|
61-90 Days |
|
|
90 Days |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Total |
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aviation |
|
$ |
1,842 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
Golf equipment |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Golf mortgage |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
Timeshare |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Structured capital |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281 |
|
Other liquidating |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,273 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
3,644 |
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aviation |
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
Golf equipment |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
Golf mortgage |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
Timeshare |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
Structured capital |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
Other liquidating |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,694 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
4,213 |
|
|
At July 2, 2011, accrual status loans that were 90 days past due totaled $7 million. We had no
accrual status loans that were 90 days past due at January 1, 2011. At July 2, 2011, the 60+ days
contractual delinquency as a percentage of finance receivables held for investment was 8.29%,
compared with 9.77% at January 1, 2011.
Impaired Loans
We evaluate individual finance receivables held for investment in non-homogeneous portfolios and
larger accounts in homogeneous loan portfolios for impairment on a quarterly basis. Finance
receivables classified as held for sale are reflected at the lower of cost or fair value and are
excluded from these evaluations. A finance receivable is considered impaired when
10
it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement based on our review of the credit quality indicators discussed above. Impaired finance
receivables include both nonaccrual accounts and accounts for which full collection of principal and interest remains probable, but the
accounts original terms have been, or are expected to be, significantly modified. If the
modification specifies an interest rate equal to or greater than a market rate for a finance
receivable with comparable risk, the account is not considered impaired in years subsequent to the
modification. There was no significant interest income recognized on impaired loans in the first
half of 2011 or 2010.
The average recorded investment in impaired loans
for the first half of 2011 and 2010 is provided
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golf |
|
|
Golf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Aviation |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Timeshare |
|
|
Liquidating |
|
|
Total |
|
|
For the six months ended July 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with a related
allowance for losses recorded |
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
660 |
|
Impaired loans with no related allowance
for losses recorded |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
838 |
|
|
For the six months ended July 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with a related
allowance for losses recorded |
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
Impaired loans with no related allowance
for losses recorded |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
420 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
A summary of impaired finance receivables, excluding leveraged leases, and related allowance for
losses is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golf |
|
|
Golf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Aviation |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Timeshare |
|
|
Liquidating |
|
|
Total |
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with
a related allowance for
losses recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment |
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
582 |
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
Related allowance |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
Impaired loans with no
related allowance for
losses recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
Total impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
Related allowance |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with
a related allowance for
losses recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment |
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
697 |
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
Related allowance |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
Impaired loans with no
related allowance for
losses recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
Total impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
Related allowance |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
11
Allowance for Losses
We maintain the allowance for losses on finance receivables held for investment at a level
considered adequate to cover inherent losses in the portfolio based on managements evaluation and
analysis by product line. For larger balance accounts specifically identified as impaired,
including large accounts in homogeneous portfolios, a reserve is established based on comparing the
carrying value with either a) the expected future cash flows, discounted at the finance
receivables effective interest rate; or b) the fair value, if the finance receivable is collateral
dependent. The expected future cash flows consider collateral value; financial performance and
liquidity of our borrower; existence and financial strength of guarantors; estimated recovery
costs, including legal expenses; and costs associated with the repossession/foreclosure and
eventual disposal of collateral. When there is a range of potential outcomes, we perform multiple
discounted cash flow analyses and weight the potential outcomes based on their relative likelihood of
occurrence using the probability-weighted approach.
The
evaluation of our portfolios is inherently subjective as it requires
estimates. These estimates include the
amount and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired finance receivables and
the underlying collateral, which may differ from actual results. While our analysis is specific to
each individual account, the most critical factors included in this analysis vary by product line.
For the aviation product line, these factors include industry valuation guides, physical condition
of the aircraft, payment history, and existence and financial strength of guarantors. For the golf
equipment line, the critical factors are the age and condition of the collateral, while the factors
for the golf mortgage line include historical golf course, hotel or marina cash flow performance;
estimates of golf rounds and price per round or occupancy and room rates; market discount and
capitalization rates; and existence and financial strength of guarantors. For the timeshare
product line, the critical factors are the historical performance of consumer notes receivable
collateral, real estate valuations, operating expenses of the borrower, the impact of bankruptcy
court rulings on the value of the collateral, legal and other professional expenses and borrowers
access to capital.
We also establish an allowance for losses by product line to cover probable but specifically
unknown losses existing in the portfolio. For homogeneous portfolios, including the aviation and
golf equipment product lines, the allowance is established as a percentage of non-recourse finance
receivables, which have not been identified as requiring specific reserves. The percentage is
based on a combination of factors, including historical loss experience, current delinquency and
default trends, collateral values, and both general economic and specific industry trends. For
non-homogeneous portfolios, including the golf mortgage and timeshare product lines, the allowance
is established as a percentage of watchlist balances, as defined on page 10, which represents a
combination of assumed default likelihood and loss severity based on historical experience,
industry trends and collateral values. In establishing our allowance for losses to cover accounts
not specifically identified, the most critical factors for the aviation product line include the
collateral value of the portfolio, historical default experience and delinquency trends; for golf
equipment, factors considered include historical loss experience and delinquency trends; and for
golf mortgage, factors include an evaluation of individual loan credit quality indicators such as
delinquency, loan balance to collateral value, debt service coverage, existence and financial
strength of guarantors, historical progression from watchlist to nonaccrual status and historical
loss severity. For the timeshare product line, we evaluate individual loan credit quality
indicators such as borrowing base shortfalls for revolving notes receivable facilities, default
rates of our notes receivable collateral, borrowers access to capital, historical progression from
watchlist to nonaccrual status and estimates of loss severity based on analysis of impaired loans
in the product line.
Finance receivables held for investment are written down to the fair value (less estimated costs to
sell) of the related collateral at the earlier of the date when the collateral is repossessed or
when no payment has been received for six months unless management deems the receivable
collectable. Finance receivables are charged off when the remaining balance is deemed to be
uncollectible.
12
A rollforward of the allowance for losses on finance receivables held for investment and a
summary of its composition, based on how the underlying finance receivables are evaluated for
impairment, is presented below. The finance receivables reported in the following table
specifically exclude $281 million of leveraged leases at both July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, in
accordance with authoritative accounting standards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golf |
|
|
Golf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Aviation |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Timeshare |
|
|
Liquidating |
|
|
Total |
|
|
For the six months ended July 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
342 |
|
Provision for losses |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Net charge-offs and transfers |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
Ending balance based on individual evaluations |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Ending balance based on collective evaluation |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
Finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
787 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
619 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
3,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended July 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
Provision for losses |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
Ending balance based on individual evaluations |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Ending balance based on collective evaluation |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
Finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
1,007 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
3,789 |
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
788 |
|
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
$ |
4,796 |
|
|
Note 7: Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
989 |
|
|
$ |
784 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,716 |
|
|
|
3,415 |
|
Progress/milestone payments |
|
|
(1,154 |
) |
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
2,562 |
|
|
$ |
2,277 |
|
|
Note 8: Debt
On May 5, 2009, we issued $600 million of convertible notes with a maturity date of May 1, 2013 and
concurrently purchased call options to acquire our common stock and sold warrants to purchase our
common stock for the purpose of reducing the potential dilutive effect to our shareholders and/or
our cash outflow upon the conversion of the convertible notes. For more information on these
transactions, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Textrons 2010 Annual Report
on Form 10-K. For at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ended June 30,
2011, our common stock price exceeded the $17.06 per share conversion threshold price set forth for
these convertible notes. Accordingly, the notes are convertible at the holders option through
September 30, 2011. We may deliver shares of common stock, cash or a combination of cash and
shares of common stock in satisfaction of our obligations upon conversion of the convertible notes.
We intend to settle the face value of the convertible notes in cash. Based on a July 2, 2011
stock price of $23.94, the if converted value exceeds the face amount of the notes by $494
million; however, after giving effect to the exercise of the call options and warrants, the
incremental cash or share settlement in excess of the face amount would
13
result in either a 15.6 million net share issuance or a cash payment of $374 million, or a
combination of cash and stock, at our option. We have continued to classify these convertible
notes as long-term based on our intent and ability to maintain the debt outstanding for at least
one year through the use of various funding sources available to us.
Note 9: Accrued Liabilities
We provide limited warranty and product maintenance programs, including parts and labor, for
certain products for periods ranging from one to five years. Changes in our warranty and product
maintenance liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Accrual at the beginning of period |
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
Provision |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Adjustments to prior accrual estimates |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at the end of period |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
Note 10: Commitments and Contingencies
We are subject to legal proceedings and other claims arising out of the conduct of our business,
including proceedings and claims relating to commercial and financial transactions; government
contracts; compliance with applicable laws and regulations; production partners; product liability;
employment; and environmental, safety and health matters. Some of these legal proceedings and
claims seek damages, fines or penalties in substantial amounts or remediation of environmental
contamination. As a government contractor, we are subject to audits, reviews and investigations to
determine whether our operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable regulatory
requirements. Under federal government procurement regulations, certain claims brought by the U.S.
Government could result in our being suspended or debarred from U.S. Government contracting for a
period of time. On the basis of information presently available, we do not believe that existing
proceedings and claims will have a material effect on our financial position or results of
operations.
Note 11. Derivative Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
We measure fair value at the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We
prioritize the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
into a three-tier fair value hierarchy. This fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority
(Level 1) to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest
priority (Level 3) to unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exist, requiring
companies to develop their own assumptions. Observable inputs that do not meet the criteria of
Level 1, and include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted
prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active are categorized as Level
2. Level 3 inputs are those that reflect our estimates about the assumptions market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the
circumstances. Valuation techniques for assets and liabilities measured using Level 3 inputs may
include methodologies such as the market approach, the income approach or the cost approach and may
use unobservable inputs such as projections, estimates and managements interpretation of current
market data. These unobservable inputs are utilized only to the extent that observable inputs are
not available or cost-effective to obtain.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consist primarily
of our derivative financial instruments, which are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value
hierarchy. The fair value amounts of these instruments that are designated as hedging instruments
are provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(In millions) |
|
Borrowing Group |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate exchange contracts* |
|
Finance |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate exchange contracts* |
|
Finance |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Interest rate exchange contracts represent fair value hedges. |
14
The Finance groups interest rate exchange contracts are not exchange traded and are measured at
fair value utilizing widely accepted, third-party developed valuation models. The actual terms of
each individual contract are entered into a valuation model, along with interest rate and foreign
exchange rate data, which is based on readily observable market data published by third-party
leading financial news and data providers. Credit risk is factored into the fair value of these
assets and liabilities based on the differential between both our credit default swap spread for
liabilities and the counterpartys credit default swap spread for assets as compared with a
standard AA-rated counterparty; however, this had no significant impact on the valuation at July 2,
2011. At July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, we had interest rate exchange contracts with notional
amounts of $0.9 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.
Foreign currency exchange contracts are measured at fair value using the market method valuation
technique. The inputs to this technique utilize current foreign currency exchange forward market
rates published by third-party leading financial news and data providers. These are observable
data that represent the rates that the financial institution uses for contracts entered into at
that date; however, they are not based on actual transactions so they are classified as Level 2.
At July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, we had foreign currency exchange contracts with notional
amounts of $713 million and $635 million, respectively.
The Finance group also has investments in other marketable securities totaling $23 million and
$51 million at July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively, that are classified as available for
sale. These investments are classified as Level 2 as the fair value for these notes was determined
based on observable market inputs for similar securitization interests in markets that are
relatively inactive compared with the market environment in which they were originally issued and based on
bids received from prospective purchasers.
Fair Value Hedges
Our Finance group enters into interest rate exchange contracts to mitigate exposure to changes in
the fair value of its fixed-rate receivables and debt due to fluctuations in interest rates. By
using these contracts, we are able to convert our fixed-rate cash flows to floating-rate cash
flows. The amount of ineffectiveness on our fair value hedges and the gain (loss) recorded in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations were both insignificant in the first half of 2011 and 2010.
Cash Flow Hedges
We manufacture and sell our products in a number of countries throughout the world, and, therefore,
we are exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The primary purpose of our foreign
currency hedging activities is to manage the volatility associated with foreign currency purchases
of materials, foreign currency sales of products, and other assets and liabilities in the normal
course of business. We primarily utilize forward exchange contracts and purchased options with
maturities of no more than three years that qualify as cash flow hedges and are intended to offset
the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on forecasted sales, inventory purchases and overhead
expenses. At July 2, 2011, we had a net deferred gain of $28 million in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss related to these cash flow hedges. Net gains and
losses recognized in earnings and Accumulated other comprehensive
loss on these cash flow hedges, including gains and losses related to
hedge ineffectiveness, were not material in the three- and six-month periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010. We
do not expect the amount of gains and losses in Accumulated other comprehensive loss that will be reclassified to earnings in the next twelve months to be
material.
We hedge our net investment position in major currencies and generate foreign currency interest
payments that offset other transactional exposures in these currencies. To accomplish this, we
borrow directly in foreign currency and designate a portion of foreign currency debt as a hedge of
net investments. We also may utilize currency forwards as hedges of our related foreign net
investments. We record changes in the fair value of these contracts in other comprehensive income
to the extent they are effective as cash flow hedges. If a contract does not qualify for hedge
accounting or is designated as a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the contract are
recorded in earnings. Currency effects on the effective portion of these hedges, which are
reflected in the foreign currency translation adjustment account within OCI, produced a $27 million
after-tax gain in the first half of 2011, resulting in an accumulated net gain balance of $41
million at July 2, 2011. The ineffective portion of these hedges was insignificant.
15
Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The table below presents those assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that
had fair value measurement adjustments during the first half of 2011 and 2010. These assets were
measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) and include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Finance group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired finance receivables |
|
$ |
407 |
|
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
(104 |
) |
Finance receivables held for sale |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
Impaired Finance Receivables Impaired nonaccrual finance receivables are included in the table
above since the measurement of required reserves on our impaired finance receivables is
significantly dependent on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Fair values of collateral
are determined based on the use of appraisals, industry pricing guides, input from market
participants, our recent experience selling similar assets or internally developed discounted cash
flow models. Fair value measurements recorded on impaired finance receivables resulted in charges
to provision for loan losses and primarily were related to initial fair value adjustments.
Finance Receivables Held for Sale Finance receivables held for sale are recorded at the lower of
cost or fair value. As a result of our plan to exit the non-captive Finance business certain
finance receivables are classified as held for sale. At July 2, 2011, the finance receivables held
for sale are primarily assets in the golf mortgage, other
liquidating and timeshare product lines. Timeshare and other
liquidating finance
receivables classified as held for sale were identified at the individual loan level; whereas golf
course mortgages were identified as a portion of a larger portfolio with common characteristics
based on the intention to balance the sale of certain loans with the collection of others to
maximize economic value. These finance receivables are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis during periods in which the fair value is lower than the cost value.
There are no active, quoted market prices for our finance receivables. The estimate of fair value
was determined based on the use of discounted cash flow models to estimate the exit price we expect
to receive in the principal market for each type of loan in an orderly transaction, which includes
both the sale of pools of similar assets and the sale of individual loans. The models we used
incorporate estimates of the rate of return, financing cost, capital structure and/or discount rate
expectations of current market participants combined with estimated loan cash flows based on credit
losses, payment rates and credit line utilization rates. Where available, assumptions related to
the expectations of current market participants are compared with observable market inputs,
including bids from prospective purchasers of similar loans and certain bond market indices for
loans perceived to be of similar credit quality. Although we utilize and prioritize these market
observable inputs in our discounted cash flow models, these inputs are not typically derived from
markets with directly comparable loan structures, industries and collateral types. Therefore, all
valuations of finance receivables held for sale involve significant management judgment, which can
result in differences between our fair value estimates and those of other market participants.
Other assets Other assets include repossessed assets and properties, operating assets received
in satisfaction of troubled finance receivables and other investments, which are accounted for
under the equity method of accounting and have no active, quoted market prices. The fair value of
these assets is determined based on the use of appraisals, industry pricing guides, input from
market participants, our recent experience selling similar assets or internally developed
discounted cash flow models. For our other investments, the discounted cash flow models
incorporate assumptions specific to the nature of the investments business and underlying assets
and include industry valuation benchmarks such as discount rates, capitalization rates and cash
flow multiples.
16
Assets and Liabilities Not Recorded at Fair Value
The carrying value and estimated fair values of our financial instruments that are not reflected in
the financial statements at fair value are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
(In millions) |
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Manufacturing group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding leases |
|
$ |
(2,219 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,776 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,172 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,698 |
) |
Finance group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables held for investment, excluding leases |
|
|
2,878 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
3,345 |
|
|
|
3,131 |
|
Debt |
|
|
(2,499 |
) |
|
|
(2,442 |
) |
|
|
(3,660 |
) |
|
|
(3,528 |
) |
|
Fair value for the Manufacturing group debt is determined using market observable data for similar
transactions. At July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, approximately 44% and 33%, respectively, of the
fair value of term debt for the Finance group was determined based on observable market
transactions. The remaining Finance group debt was determined based on discounted cash flow
analyses using observable market inputs from debt with similar duration, subordination and credit
default expectations. We utilize the same valuation methodologies to determine the fair value
estimates for finance receivables held for investment as used for finance receivables held for
sale.
Note 12: Income Tax Expense
For both the three and six months ended July 2, 2011, income tax expense equated to an effective
income tax rate (provision on income from continuing operations) of 32%, compared to the Federal
statutory income tax rate of 35%.
For the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, income tax expense equated to an effective income
tax rate of 18% and 30%, compared to the Federal statutory income tax rate of 35%. In the second
quarter of 2010, the rate was significantly lower than the statutory rate primarily due to $10
million in benefits related to changes in the functional currency of two Canadian subsidiaries as a
result of the termination of the qualified business status for one subsidiary and a Quebec
legislative change for another subsidiary. For the first half of 2010, the effective tax rate
included the write-off of an $11 million deferred tax asset related to a change in the tax
treatment of the Medicare Part D program related to U.S. health-care legislation enacted in the
first quarter of 2010, partially offset by $10 million in benefits related to changes in the
functional currency of two Canadian subsidiaries noted above.
Note 13: Segment Information
We operate in, and report financial information for, the following five business segments: Cessna,
Bell, Textron Systems, Industrial and Finance. Segment profit is an important measure used for
evaluating performance and for decision-making purposes. Segment profit for the manufacturing
segments excludes interest expense, certain corporate expenses and special charges. The
measurement for the Finance segment excludes special charges and includes interest income and
expense along with intercompany interest expense. Provisions for losses on finance receivables
involving the sale or lease of our products are recorded by the selling manufacturing division when
our Finance group has recourse to the Manufacturing group.
17
Our revenues by segment and a reconciliation of segment profit to income from continuing operations
before income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cessna |
|
$ |
652 |
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
1,208 |
|
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
Bell |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
Textron Systems |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
2,653 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
4,787 |
|
Finance Group |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
2,728 |
|
|
$ |
2,709 |
|
|
$ |
5,207 |
|
|
$ |
4,919 |
|
|
SEGMENT OPERATING PROFIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cessna |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
Bell |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Textron Systems |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
Finance Group |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
Corporate expenses and other, net |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Interest expense, net for Manufacturing group |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
18
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Consolidated Results of Operations
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,728 |
|
|
$ |
2,709 |
|
|
$ |
5,207 |
|
|
$ |
4,919 |
|
% change compared with prior period |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues increased $19 million, 0.7%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, as revenue increases in the Industrial, Bell and Cessna segments were
partially offset by lower revenue in the Textron Systems and Finance segments. The net revenue
increase included the following factors:
|
|
|
Higher Industrial segment revenues of $58 million, primarily due to a favorable foreign
exchange impact of $43 million, largely due to fluctuations with the euro; |
|
|
|
|
Higher revenues of $49 million in the Bell segment, largely due to higher volume in our
military programs reflecting higher deliveries of H-1 aircraft; and |
|
|
|
|
An increase in Cessnas revenue of $17 million, primarily related to pricing; |
|
|
|
|
Partially offset by a decrease in Textron Systems revenue of $82 million, primarily due
to lower volume in the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) and Mission Support and Other product
lines; and |
|
|
|
|
Lower revenues at the Finance segment of $23 million, primarily attributable to the
lower average finance receivable portfolio balance resulting from the continued
liquidation. |
Revenues increased $288 million, 5.9%, in the first half of 2011, compared with the corresponding
period of 2010, as revenue increases in the Bell, Cessna, and Industrial segments were
partially offset by lower revenue in the Textron Systems and Finance segments. The net revenue
increase included the following factors:
|
|
|
Higher revenues of $180 million in the Bell segment, largely due to higher volume in our
military programs reflecting higher deliveries of V-22 and H-1 aircraft; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in Cessna revenues of $140 million, primarily due to a $108 million impact
related to the mix of light- and mid-size Citation business jets sold
in the first half of 2011; and |
|
|
|
|
Higher Industrial segment revenues of $136 million, largely due to higher volume of $68
million, reflecting continued improvements in the automotive industry, and a favorable
foreign exchange impact of $50 million, largely due to fluctuations with the euro; |
|
|
|
|
Partially offset by a decrease in Textron Systems revenue of $95 million, primarily due
to lower volume in the UAS and Mission Support and Other product lines; and |
|
|
|
|
Lower revenues at the Finance segment of $73 million, primarily attributable to the
lower average finance receivable portfolio balance resulting from the continued
liquidation. |
Cost of Sales and Selling and Administrative Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
2,520 |
|
|
$ |
2,487 |
|
|
$ |
4,879 |
|
|
$ |
4,548 |
|
% change compared with prior period |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
2,225 |
|
|
$ |
2,188 |
|
|
$ |
4,280 |
|
|
$ |
3,963 |
|
% change compared with prior period |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Gross margin percentage of Manufacturing revenues |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
599 |
|
|
$ |
585 |
|
% change compared with prior period |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing cost of sales and selling and administrative expenses together comprise our operating
expenses. Consolidated operating expenses remained flat at $2.5 billion in both the second quarter
of 2011 and 2010 and were $4.9 billion and $4.5
billion in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Changes in operating expenses are more
fully discussed in our Segment Analysis below.
19
Consolidated manufacturing cost of sales as a percentage of Manufacturing revenues was 82.6% and
82.5% in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. On a dollar basis, Consolidated
manufacturing cost of sales increased $37 million, 1.7%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared
with the corresponding period of 2010, principally due to higher net sales volume changes in the
Bell and Cessna segments, partially offset by lower net sales volume at Textron Systems. Cost of
sales increased at the Industrial segment, primarily due to the impact of foreign exchange on
direct materials and labor of $30 million, largely due to fluctuations with the euro.
Consolidated manufacturing cost of sales as a percentage of Manufacturing revenues was 83.1% and
82.8% in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. On a dollar basis, consolidated cost of
sales increased $317 million, 8%, in the first half of 2011, principally due to higher net sales
volume changes in the Bell, Cessna, and Industrial segments, partially offset by lower net sales
volume at Textron Systems. Cost of sales also increased at the
Industrial segment due to the impact
of foreign exchange on direct materials and labor of $35 million, largely due to fluctuations with
the euro.
On a consolidated basis, selling and administrative expense decreased $4 million, 1.3%, to $295
million in the second quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010. For the
first half of 2011, selling and administrative expense increased $14 million, 2%, to $599 million,
compared with the corresponding period of 2010. These changes were largely driven by fluctuations
in our sales volume.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
% change compared with prior period |
|
|
(11.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on the Consolidated Statement of Operations includes interest for both the Finance
and Manufacturing borrowing groups with interest related to intercompany borrowings eliminated.
Our consolidated interest expense decreased for both the second quarter and first half of 2011,
compared to the corresponding periods of 2010, primarily due to a decrease for the Finance group,
largely due to the reduction in its debt as it liquidates the non-captive commercial finance
business.
Special Charges
Special charges of $10 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $22 million in the first half of
2010 represent restructuring costs incurred under the program that was completed at the end of 2010
and primarily represent severance costs. There were no special charges in 2011.
Income Tax Expense
For both the three and six months ended July 2, 2011, income tax expense equated to an effective
income tax rate (provision on income from continuing operations) of 32%, compared to the Federal
statutory income tax rate of 35%.
For the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, income tax expense equated to an effective income
tax rate of 18% and 30%, compared to the Federal statutory income tax rate of 35%. In the second
quarter of 2010, the rate was significantly lower than the statutory rate primarily due to $10
million in benefits related to changes in the functional currency of two Canadian subsidiaries as a
result of the termination of the qualified business status for one subsidiary and a Quebec
legislative change for another subsidiary. For the first half of 2010, the effective tax rate
included the write-off of an $11 million deferred tax asset related to a change in the tax
treatment of the Medicare Part D program related to U.S. health-care legislation enacted in the
first quarter of 2010, partially offset by $10 million in benefits related to changes in the
functional currency of two Canadian subsidiaries noted above.
Backlog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Bell |
|
$ |
6,953 |
|
|
$ |
7,199 |
|
Cessna |
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
2,928 |
|
Textron Systems |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
Backlog at
Bell decreased $246 million in the first half of 2011, primarily reflecting deliveries related to the V-22 and H-1 programs, partially
offset by commercial aircraft orders in excess of deliveries. Backlog declined $406 million at
Cessna primarily reflecting deliveries in excess of orders.
20
Segment Analysis
We operate in, and report financial information for, the following five business segments:
Cessna, Bell, Textron Systems, Industrial and Finance. Segment profit is an important measure used
for evaluating performance and for decision-making purposes. Segment profit for the manufacturing
segments excludes interest expense, certain corporate expenses and special charges. The
measurement for the Finance segment excludes special charges and
includes interest income and expense along with intercompany interest
expense.
In our discussion of comparative results for the Manufacturing group, changes in revenue and
segment profit typically are expressed for our commercial business in terms of volume, pricing,
foreign exchange and acquisitions. Additionally, changes in segment profit may be expressed in
terms of mix, inflation and cost performance. Volume changes in revenue represent
increases/decreases in the number of units delivered or services provided. Pricing represents
changes in unit pricing. Foreign exchange is the change resulting from translating
foreign-denominated amounts into U.S. dollars at exchange rates that are different from the prior
period. Acquisitions refer to the results generated from businesses that were acquired within the
previous 12 months. For segment profit, mix represents a change due to the composition of products
and/or services sold at different profit margins. Inflation represents higher material, wages,
benefits, pension or other costs. Cost performance reflects an increase or decrease in research
and development, depreciation, selling and administrative costs, warranty, product liability,
quality/scrap, labor efficiency, overhead, product line profitability, start-up, ramp up and
cost-reduction initiatives or other manufacturing inputs.
Approximately 34% of our revenues are derived from contracts with the U.S. Government. For our
segments that have significant contracts with the U.S. Government, we typically express changes in
segment profit related to the government business in terms of volume, changes in program
performance or changes in contract mix. Changes in volume that are discussed in net sales
typically drive corresponding changes in our segment profit based on the profit rate for a
particular contract. Changes in program performance typically relate to profit recognition
associated with revisions to total estimated costs at completion that reflect improved or
deteriorated operating performance or award fee rates. Changes in contract mix refer to changes in
operating margin due to a change in the relative volume of contracts with higher or lower fee rates
such that the overall average margin rate for the segment changes.
Cessna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
652 |
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
1,208 |
|
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Profit margin |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
(2.7 |
)% |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
The following factors contributed to the change in Cessnas revenue for the periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
|
versus |
|
|
versus |
|
(In millions) |
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Volume and mix |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
Pricing |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Total change |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
In the second quarter of 2011, Cessnas revenues increased $17 million, 3%, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010. Cessnas aftermarket revenues grew
to
29% of its segment revenue in the second quarter of 2011, compared
with 26% of segment revenue in the second quarter of 2010. We delivered 38 and 43 Citation business jets in the second quarter of 2011 and
2010, respectively.
In the first half of 2011, Cessnas revenues increased $140 million, 13%, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to a $108 million impact related to the mix of light-
and mid-size Citation business jets sold during the period. We delivered 69 and 74 Citation
business jets in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Cessnas aftermarket revenues
represented $32 million of the higher volume, while accounting for 31% of Cessnas segment
revenue in both the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
21
The following factors contributed to the change in Cessnas segment profit for the periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
|
versus |
|
|
versus |
|
(In millions) |
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Volume and mix |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
14 |
|
Pricing, net of inflation |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Performance |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
Total change |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
Cessnas segment profit increased $2 million in the second quarter of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to higher pricing, net of inflation of $10 million,
partially offset by unfavorable performance of $6 million. Performance included $14 million in
higher engineering and development expenses as we increased our investment in future product
offerings.
Cessnas
operating expenses increased by $15 million, 2%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared
with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to the $14 million of higher engineering and
development expenses as discussed above.
Cessnas segment loss was $12 million higher in the first half of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to unfavorable performance of $32 million, partially
offset by a $14 million impact related to volume and mix, primarily related to business jet mix.
Performance included higher engineering and development expenses of $23 million, primarily due to
new product development, and lower income from forfeited deposits of $15 million.
Cessnas operating expenses increased by $152 million, 14%, in the first half of 2011, compared
with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to an $81 million increase in direct material
costs and a $37 million increase in manufacturing overhead largely in correlation with the revenue
increase. As discussed above, operating expenses also increased due to higher engineering and
development expenses and lower income from forfeited deposits.
Bell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V-22 program |
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
718 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
Other military |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Profit margin |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
Bell manufactures helicopters, tiltrotor aircraft, and related spare parts and provides services
for military and/or commercial markets. Bells major U.S. Government programs at this time are the
V-22 tiltrotor aircraft and the H-1 helicopter platforms, which are both in the production stage
and represent a significant portion of Bells revenues from the U.S. Government. During 2011, we
continued to ramp up production and deliveries to meet customer schedule requirements for these
programs.
The following factors contributed to the change in Bells revenue for the periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
|
versus |
|
|
versus |
|
(In millions) |
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Volume |
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total change |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
Bells revenues increased $49 million, 6%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to higher volume. We delivered 9 V-22 aircraft during
the second quarter of 2011, compared with 8 deliveries in the second quarter of 2010. These higher
deliveries were partially offset by lower production support volume. We also delivered 8 H-1
aircraft in the second quarter of 2011, compared with 3 deliveries in the second quarter of 2010,
which primarily contributed to the $49 million, 23%, increase in other military revenues.
Commercial revenues were
22
essentially unchanged on 22 commercial aircraft deliveries in the second quarter of 2011, compared
with 21 aircraft in the second quarter of 2010.
Bells revenues increased $180 million, 12%, in the first half of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to higher volume. We delivered 18 V-22 aircraft during
the first half of 2011, compared with 12 deliveries in the first half of 2010, which was the
primary driver in the $150 million, 26%, increase in V-22 revenues in the first half of 2011. We
also delivered 12 H-1 aircraft in the first half of 2011, compared with 6 deliveries in the first
half of 2010. Other military revenues increased $21 million, 5%, in 2011 largely due to the higher
deliveries of H-1 aircraft, partially offset by a $70 million decrease in aftermarket volume
reflecting the completion of several non-recurring programs in 2010, along with timing of
deliveries for other programs. Commercial revenues increased $9 million, 2%, on 37 commercial
aircraft deliveries in the first half of 2011, compared with 36 aircraft in the first half of 2010,
primarily due to higher aftermarket volume.
The following factors contributed to the change in Bells segment profit for the periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
|
versus |
|
|
versus |
|
(In millions) |
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Volume and mix |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
Pricing, net of inflation |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Performance |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Total change |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
Bells segment profit increased $12 million, 11%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to improved program performance of $28 million,
partially offset by unfavorable mix primarily related to commercial aircraft sold. Bells improved
program performance primarily reflects the impact from efficiencies in our military programs that
were realized in connection with the ramp up of production lines and lower overhead costs over the
contract periods. Program performance also included the impact of a $21 million program adjustment
recognized in the second quarter of 2010 related to the recognition of profit on the H-1 and V-22
programs for reimbursement of prior year costs.
Bells
operating expenses increased $37 million, 54%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared with
the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to higher net sales volume discussed above.
Bells segment profit increased $29 million, 16%, in the first half of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to improved program performance of $38 million,
partially offset by unfavorable mix primarily in commercial aircraft sold. Bells improved program
performance primarily reflects the impact from efficiencies in our military programs that were
realized in connection with the ramp up of production lines and lower overhead and material costs
over the contract periods. Program performance also included the impact of a $21 million program
adjustment recognized in the second quarter of 2010 related to the recognition of profit on the H-1
and V-22 programs for reimbursement of prior year costs.
Bells operating expenses increased $151 million, 12%, in the first half of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to higher sales volume discussed above.
Textron Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
$ |
992 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Profit margin |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
23
The following factors contributed to the change in Textron Systems revenue for the periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
|
versus |
|
|
versus |
|
(In millions) |
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Volume |
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total change |
|
$ |
(82 |
) |
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
|
Revenues at Textron Systems decreased $82 million, 15%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared
with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to lower volume in the UAS and Mission Support
and Other product lines of $58 million and $36 million, respectively. The lower UAS volume was
largely due to the timing of revenues from various programs, while the lower Mission Support and
Other volume was largely due to the completion of several test and training programs.
Revenues at Textron Systems decreased $95 million, 10%, in the first half of 2011, compared with
the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to lower volume in the UAS and Mission Support and
Other product lines of $53 million and $37 million, respectively. The lower UAS volume was largely
due to the timing of revenues from various programs, while the lower Mission Support and Other
volume was largely due to the completion of several test and training programs.
The following factors contributed to the change in Textron Systems segment profit for the periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
|
versus |
|
|
versus |
|
(In millions) |
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Volume |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Total change |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
Segment profit at Textron Systems decreased $21 million, 30%, in the second quarter of 2011,
compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to the impact of lower volume
described above. Textron Systems operating expenses decreased $61 million, 13%, in the second
quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to lower sales
volume.
Segment profit at Textron Systems decreased $23 million, 18%, in the first half of 2011, compared
with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to the impact of lower volume described above.
Textron Systems operating expenses decreased $72 million, 8%, in the first half of 2011, compared
with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to lower sales volume.
Industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel systems and functional components |
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
$ |
823 |
|
Other industrial |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Profit margin |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
The following factors contributed to the change in Industrials revenue for the periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
|
versus |
|
|
versus |
|
(In millions) |
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Volume |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total change |
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
24
Industrial segment sales increased $58 million, 9%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared with
the corresponding period of 2010. Sales of the segments fuel systems and functional components
increased $33 million, 8% in the second quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of
2010, primarily due to a favorable foreign exchange impact of $35 million, largely due to
fluctuations with the euro. Other industrial revenues increased primarily due to a favorable
foreign exchange impact of $8 million, largely due to fluctuations with the euro and the impact of
acquisitions.
Industrial segment sales increased $136 million, 11%, in the first half of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010. Sales of the segments fuel systems and functional components
increased $98 million, 12%, in the first half of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of
2010, primarily due to higher volume of $60 million, reflecting continued improvements in the
automotive industry, and a favorable foreign exchange impact of $42 million, largely due to
fluctuations with the euro. Other industrial revenues increased primarily due to higher volume in
the powered tools, testing and measurement equipment product line.
The following factors contributed to the change in Industrials segment profit for the periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
|
versus |
|
|
versus |
|
(In millions) |
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Volume |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
Inflation, net of pricing |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Performance |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Total change |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
Industrial segment profit increased $4 million, 8%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared with
the corresponding period of 2010, largely due to improved performance of $10 million,
reflecting continued cost reduction activities. Inflation, net of pricing
of $12 million was primarily due to higher direct material costs for various commodity
and material components throughout the Industrial businesses that
exceed related price increases.
Operating expenses for the Industrial segment
increased $54 million, 9%, in the second quarter of
2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, largely due to $38 million in higher direct
material and labor costs, primarily due to the impact of foreign exchange due to fluctuations
with the euro, and $16 million in cost inflation for various commodity and material components
throughout the Industrial businesses.
Industrial segment profit increased $16 million, 16%, in the first half of 2011, compared with
the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to an $18 million impact from higher volume and
improved performance of $16 million, partially offset by inflation, net of pricing of $23
million. Performance was favorable for the period due to continued cost reduction activities and
improved manufacturing leverage resulting from higher volume.
Operating expenses for the Industrial segment increased $120 million, 10%, in the first half of
2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to $93 million in higher
direct material and labor costs, principally due to higher sales volume, a $35 million impact of
foreign exchange due to fluctuations with the euro and $21 million in cost inflation for various
commodity and material components throughout the Industrial businesses. Operating expenses were
also favorably impacted by improved performance due to continued cost reduction activities and
improved manufacturing leverage resulting from higher volume.
Finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
Provision for losses on finance receivables |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
Our plan to exit the non-captive commercial finance business in our Finance segment is being
effected through a combination of orderly liquidation and selected sales of the remaining
non-captive finance receivables. The exit plan is expected to be substantially complete over the
next three to five years.
25
Finance segment revenues decreased $23 million, 41%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared with
the corresponding period of 2010, primarily attributable to the impact of a $2.0 billion lower
average finance receivable balance. Finance segment
revenues decreased $73 million, 55%, in the first half of 2011, compared with the corresponding
period of 2010, primarily attributable to the impact of a $2.1 billion lower average finance
receivable balance.
Finance segment loss decreased $38 million, 54%, in the second quarter of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to the following factors:
|
|
|
$32 million in lower provision for loan losses, primarily the result of a decline in the
accounts identified as nonaccrual during the quarter as compared to last year; and |
|
|
|
|
$15 million in lower operating and administrative expenses, primarily due to lower
compensation expense associated with a workforce reduction and other cost reductions
related to the exit of the non-captive business; |
|
|
|
|
Partially offset by a $17 million reduction in interest margin resulting from the lower
average finance receivable portfolio balance. |
Finance segment loss decreased $52 million, 40%, in the first half of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to the following factors:
|
|
|
$75 million in lower provision for loan losses, primarily the result of a decline in the
accounts identified as nonaccrual during the first half of 2011 as compared to last year;
and |
|
|
|
|
$25 million in lower operating and administrative expenses, primarily due to lower
compensation expense associated with a workforce reduction and other cost reductions
related to the exit of the non-captive business; |
|
|
|
|
Partially offset by a $37 million reduction in interest margin resulting from the lower
average finance receivable portfolio balance. |
Finance Portfolio Quality
The following table reflects information about the Finance segments credit performance related to
finance receivables held for investment. Finance receivables held for sale are reflected at fair
value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As a result, finance receivables held for sale are not
included in the credit performance statistics below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Finance receivables held for investment |
|
$ |
3,644 |
|
|
$ |
4,213 |
|
Nonaccrual finance receivables |
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
Allowance for losses |
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
342 |
|
Ratio of nonaccrual finance receivables to finance receivables held for investment |
|
|
19.10 |
% |
|
|
20.17 |
% |
Ratio of allowance for losses on impaired nonaccrual finance receivables to impaired nonaccrual finance
receivables |
|
|
27.46 |
% |
|
|
23.82 |
% |
Ratio of allowance for losses on finance receivables to nonaccrual finance receivables held for investment |
|
|
42.96 |
% |
|
|
40.30 |
% |
Ratio of allowance for losses on finance receivables to finance receivables held for investment |
|
|
8.21 |
% |
|
|
8.13 |
% |
60+
days contractual delinquency as a percentage of finance receivables
held for investment |
|
|
8.29 |
% |
|
|
9.77 |
% |
60+ days contractual delinquency |
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
Repossessed assets and properties |
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
Operating assets received in satisfaction of troubled finance receivables |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
At July 2, 2011, finance receivables held for investment included $1.5 billion of non-captive
finance receivables, compared with $1.9 billion at the end of 2010. Finance receivables held for
sale by the non-captive business totaled $180 million at July 2, 2011, compared with $413 million
at the end of 2010.
Nonaccrual finance receivables decreased $154 million, 18%, from the year-end balance, primarily
due to reductions of $105 million in the timeshare portfolio, $27 million in the aviation portfolio
and $21 million in the other liquidating portfolio. The reduction in the timeshare portfolio was
mostly due to the resolution of one significant account and cash collections on several other
accounts. The decrease in the aviation portfolio was due to the resolution of several accounts
through cash collections and repossession of collateral, partially offset by new accounts
identified as nonaccrual in 2011.
We believe that the percentage of nonaccrual finance receivables generally will remain high as we
execute our liquidation plan. The liquidation plan is also likely to result in a slower rate of
liquidation for nonaccrual finance receivables. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for more detailed information on the nonaccrual finance receivables by product line,
along with a summary of finance receivables held for investment based on our internally assigned
credit quality indicators.
26
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our financings are conducted through two separate borrowing groups. The Manufacturing group
consists of Textron Inc. consolidated with its majority-owned subsidiaries that operate in the
Cessna, Bell, Textron Systems and Industrial segments. The Finance group, which also is the
Finance segment, consists of TFC, its consolidated subsidiaries and three other finance
subsidiaries owned by Textron Inc. We designed this framework to enhance our borrowing power by
separating the Finance group. Our Manufacturing group operations include the development,
production and delivery of tangible goods and services, while our Finance group provides financial
services. Due to the fundamental differences between each borrowing groups activities, investors,
rating agencies and analysts use different measures to evaluate each groups performance. To
support those evaluations, we present balance sheet and cash flow information for each borrowing
group within the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Key information that is utilized in assessing our liquidity is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Manufacturing group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
$ |
898 |
|
Debt |
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
3,174 |
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
Capital (debt plus shareholders equity) |
|
|
5,717 |
|
|
|
5,274 |
|
Net debt (net of cash and equivalents) to capital |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
Debt to capital |
|
|
44.5 |
% |
|
|
43.6 |
% |
Finance group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Debt |
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
We believe that our calculations of debt to capital and net debt to capital are useful measures as
they provide a summary indication of the level of debt financing (i.e., leverage) that is in place
to support our capital structure, as well as to provide an indication of the capacity to add
further leverage. We believe that with our existing cash balances, coupled with the continued
successful execution of the exit plan for the non-captive portion of the commercial finance
business, and cash we expect to generate from our manufacturing operations, we will have sufficient
cash to meet our future needs.
We maintain an effective shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that allows us to issue an unlimited amount of public debt and other securities.
On March 23, 2011, Textron Inc. entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit facility for an
aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. This facility agreement expires in March 2015 and
replaces the $1.25 billion 5-year facility that was scheduled to expire in April 2012. TFC also has
a credit facility that expires in April 2012. During the first half of 2011, the borrowing
capacity of TFCs facility was reduced to an aggregate principal amount of $700 million. At July
2, 2011, there were no amounts outstanding under the Textron Inc. facility and $500 million
outstanding under TFCs facility.
In the first half of 2011, we liquidated $802 million of the Finance groups finance receivables,
net of originations. These finance receivable reductions occurred in both the non-captive and
captive finance portfolios, but were primarily driven by the non-captive portfolio in connection
with our exit plan, including $351 million in the timeshare product line. These reductions
resulted from the combination of scheduled finance receivable collections, sales, discounted
payoffs, repossession of collateral, charge-offs and impairment charges. At July 2, 2011, $1.7
billion of finance receivables remained in the non-captive portfolio.
In 2009, we issued $600 million of 4.5% Convertible Senior Notes with a maturity date of May 1,
2013 as discussed in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For at least 20 trading days
during the 30 consecutive trading days ended June 30, 2011, our common stock price exceeded the
$17.06 per share conversion threshold price set forth for these convertible notes. Accordingly,
the notes are convertible at the holders option through September 30, 2011. We may deliver shares
of common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of common stock in satisfaction of our
obligations upon conversion of the convertible notes. We intend to settle the face value of the
convertible notes in cash. We have continued to classify these convertible notes as long term
based on our intent and ability to maintain the debt outstanding for at least one year through the
use of various funding sources available to us.
27
Manufacturing Group Cash Flows
Cash flows from continuing operations for the Manufacturing group are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
Operating activities generated less cash in 2011 largely due to $170 million in higher pension
contributions in the first half of 2011, which offset improvement in our working capital and higher
earnings, adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization. Cash used for
restructuring activities totaled $31 million and $28 million in the first half of 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
We used more cash for investing activities largely due to higher capital expenditures, which
totaled $169 million and $83 million in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
We used less cash for financing activities in the first half of 2011, largely due to the repayment
in 2010 of $502 million on our bank credit lines. We also began to issue commercial paper again in
2011 for our short-term financing needs, for which we ended the quarter with $189 million in
outstanding borrowings, which was offset by a $183 million increase in intergroup financing for our
Finance group.
Capital Contributions Paid To and Dividends Received From TFC
Under a Support Agreement between Textron Inc. and TFC, Textron Inc. is required to maintain a
controlling interest in TFC. The agreement also requires Textron Inc. to ensure that TFC maintains
fixed charge coverage of no less than 125% and consolidated shareholders equity of no less than
$200 million. Cash contributions paid to TFC to maintain compliance with the Support Agreement and
dividends paid by TFC to Textron Inc. are detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Dividends paid by TFC to Textron Inc. |
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
Capital contributions paid to TFC under Support Agreement |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
An
additional cash contribution of $40 million was paid to TFC on
July 12, 2011 as required by the
Support Agreement.
Due to the nature of these contributions, we classify these contributions within cash flows used by
operating activities for the Manufacturing group in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
Capital contributions to support Finance group growth in the ongoing captive finance business are
classified as cash flows from financing activities. The Finance groups loss is excluded from the
Manufacturing groups cash flows, while dividends from the Finance group are included within cash
flows from operating activities for the Manufacturing group as they represent a return on
investment.
Finance Group Cash Flows
The cash flows from continuing operations for the Finance group are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
(1,289 |
) |
|
Cash flow from operating activities improved in the first half of 2011, compared with the
corresponding period of 2010 largely due to a $51 million payment made to the Manufacturing group
in the first half of 2010 under the tax sharing agreement, compared with a $40 million refund
received in the first half of 2011. This was partially offset by lower earnings for the Finance
group after adjusting for non-cash items such as provision for losses on finance receivables.
Cash receipts from the collection of finance receivables continued to outpace finance receivable
originations, which resulted in net cash inflow from investing activities in both 2011 and 2010.
Finance receivables repaid and proceeds from sales totaled $919 million and $1.7 billion in the
first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively, while cash outflows for originations
28
declined to $244 million and $471 million, respectively. These decreases were largely driven by the wind down of
the non-captive finance receivable portfolio.
In the first half of 2011, TFC paid $940 million against the outstanding balance on its bank line
of credit; however, cash used for financing activities was lower in 2011 primarily, due to $498
million in long-term debt repayments in the first half of 2011, compared with $1.5 billion in the
first half of 2010. In addition, the Finance group received $265 million in proceeds from the
issuance of long-term debt in the first half of 2011, compared with $28 million in the first half
of 2010.
TFC borrowed $395 million and $212 million from Textron Inc. with interest in the first half of
2011 and 2010, respectively, to pay down maturing debt. As of July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011,
the outstanding balance due to Textron Inc. for these borrowings was $710 million and $315 million,
respectively.
Consolidated Cash Flows
The consolidated cash flows from continuing operations, after elimination of activity between the
borrowing groups, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
(1,009 |
) |
|
|
(1,974 |
) |
|
Operating activities generated less cash in 2011 largely due to $170 million in higher pension
contributions, which offset working capital improvements and higher earnings, adjusted for non-cash
items such as depreciation and amortization.
Cash receipts from the collection of finance receivables continued to outpace finance receivable
originations, which resulted in net cash inflow from investing activities in both 2011 and 2010.
Finance receivables repaid and proceeds from sales totaled $679 million and $1.3 billion in the
first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively, while cash outflows for originations declined to $110
million and $270 million, respectively. These decreases were largely driven by the wind down of
the non-captive finance receivable portfolio.
Cash used for financing activities was lower in 2011 primarily due to lower repayments of long-term
debt of $511 million in the first half of 2011, compared with $1,491 million in the first half of
2010. In addition, we received proceeds of $265 million in the first half of 2011 from the
issuance of debt, compared with $28 million in the first half of 2010. In the first half of 2011,
we began to issue commercial paper again for our short-term financing needs, ending the period with
$189 million of outstanding borrowings. The increase in proceeds from these borrowings was offset
by a $438 million increase in discretionary payments made against the outstanding balance on our
bank lines of credit.
Captive Financing and Other Intercompany Transactions
The Finance group finances retail purchases and leases for new and used aircraft and equipment in
support of our Manufacturing group, otherwise known as captive financing. In the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, cash received from customers or from securitizations is reflected as
operating activities when received from third parties. However, in the cash flow information
provided for the separate borrowing groups, cash flows related to captive financing activities are
reflected based on the operations of each group. For example, when product is sold by our
Manufacturing group to a customer and is financed by the Finance group, the origination of the
finance receivable is recorded within investing activities as a cash outflow in the Finance groups
statement of cash flows. Meanwhile, in the Manufacturing groups statement of cash flows, the cash
received from the Finance group on the customers behalf is recorded within operating cash flows as
a cash inflow. Although cash is transferred between the two borrowing groups, there is no cash
transaction reported in the consolidated cash flows at the time of the original financing. These
captive financing activities, along with all significant intercompany transactions, are
reclassified or eliminated from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
29
Reclassification and elimination adjustments included in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Reclassifications from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivable originations for Manufacturing group inventory sales |
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
|
$ |
(201 |
) |
Cash received from customers and sale of receivables |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
Other capital contributions made to Finance group |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
Total reclassifications from investing activities |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
Reclassifications from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution paid by Manufacturing group to Finance group under
Support Agreement |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Dividends received by Manufacturing group from Finance group |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
Other capital contributions made to Finance group |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Total reclassifications from financing activities |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
Total reclassifications and adjustments to cash flow from operating activities |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other oral and written statements
made by us from time to time are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements, which may describe
strategies, goals, outlook or other non-historical matters, or project revenues, income, returns or
other financial measures, often include words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend,
plan, estimate, guidance, project, target, potential, will, should, could,
likely or may and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other
factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which
they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
In addition to those factors described herein under RISK FACTORS, factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from past and projected future results are the following:
|
|
|
Changing priorities or reductions in the U.S. Government
defense budget, including those related to military operations in foreign countries; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in worldwide economic or political conditions that
impact demand for our products, interest rates or foreign exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to perform as anticipated and to control costs
under contracts with the U.S. Government; |
|
|
|
|
The U.S. Governments ability to unilaterally modify or
terminate its contracts with us for the U.S. Governments convenience or for our failure to
perform, to change applicable procurement and accounting policies, or, under certain
circumstances, to suspend or debar us as a contractor eligible to receive future contract
awards; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in foreign military funding priorities or budget
constraints and determinations, or changes in government regulations or policies on the
export and import of military and commercial products; |
|
|
|
|
Our Finance segments ability to maintain portfolio credit
quality or to realize full value of receivables and of assets acquired upon foreclosure of
receivables; |
|
|
|
|
Textron Financial Corporations (TFC) ability to maintain
certain minimum levels of financial performance required under its committed bank line of
credit and under Textrons support agreement with TFC; |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to access the capital markets at reasonable rates; |
|
|
|
|
Performance issues with key suppliers, subcontractors or
business partners; |
|
|
|
|
Legislative or regulatory actions impacting our operations or
demand for our products; |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to control costs and successfully implement
various cost-reduction activities; |
|
|
|
|
The efficacy of research and development investments to
develop new products or unanticipated expenses in connection with the launching of
significant new products or programs; |
|
|
|
|
The timing of our new product launches or certifications of
our new aircraft products; |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to keep pace with our competitors in the
introduction of new products and upgrades with features and technologies desired by our
customers; |
30
|
|
|
The extent to which we are able to pass raw material price
increases through to customers or offset such price increases by reducing other costs; |
|
|
|
|
Increases in pension expenses or employee and retiree medical
benefits; |
|
|
|
|
Uncertainty in estimating reserves, including reserves
established to address contingent liabilities, unrecognized tax benefits, or potential
losses on TFCs receivables; |
|
|
|
|
Difficult conditions in the financial markets which may
adversely impact our customers ability to fund or finance purchases of our products; and |
|
|
|
|
Continued volatility in the economy resulting in a prolonged
downturn in the markets in which we do business. |
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There has been no significant change in our exposure to market risk during the six months ended
July 2, 2011. For discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7A. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk contained in Textrons 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act)) as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered
by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that (a) the information required to
be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, and (b) such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter
ended July 2, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business, financial condition and results of
operations are subject to various risks, including the following risk factor as well as the risk factors
discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2011, all of which
should be carefully considered by investors in our securities.
We have customer concentration with the U.S. Government.
During 2010, we derived approximately 34% of our revenues from sales to a variety of U.S. Government entities.
Our ability to compete successfully for and retain U.S. Government business is highly dependent on technical excellence,
management proficiency, strategic alliances, cost-effective performance, and the ability to recruit and retain key
personnel. Our revenues from the U.S. Government largely result from contracts awarded to us under various U.S. Government
defense-related programs. The funding of these programs is subject to congressional appropriation decisions.
Although multiple-year contracts may be planned in connection with major procurements, Congress generally appropriates
funds on a fiscal year basis even though a program may continue for several years. Consequently, programs often are
only partially funded initially, and additional funds are committed only as Congress makes further appropriations.
The reduction or termination of funding, or changes in the timing of funding, for a U.S. Government program in
which we provide products or services would result in a reduction or loss of anticipated future revenues attributable
to that program and could have a negative impact on our results of operations. Significant changes in national
and international priorities for defense spending could impact the funding, or the timing of funding, of our programs,
which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, as has been widely reported, the U.S. Government
is reportedly approaching its existing statutory limit on the amount of permissible federal debt, and this limit
must be raised in order for the U.S. Government to continue to pay its obligations on a timely basis.
If the debt ceiling is not raised, it is unclear how the U.S.
Government would prioritize its payments towards its various programs and
where our payments would fall in that priority list. In addition, all
forms of U.S. Government financing, such as performance-based
payments and milestone payments may be delayed until the debt crisis
is resolved. As described above, a significant portion of our products and
services are provided under U.S. Government contracts. U.S. Government contracts generally require the contractor
to continue to perform on the contract even if the U.S. Government is unable to make timely payments; failure to
continue
31
contract performance places the contractor at risk of termination for default. Should conditions occur
such that the U.S. Government does not pay us on a timely basis, we would need to finance our continued performance
of the impacted contracts from our available cash resources, credit facilities and/or access to the capital markets,
if available. An extended delay in the timely payment by the U.S. Government could result in a material adverse
effect on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of ratio of income to fixed charges of Textron Inc. Manufacturing Group |
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Computation of ratio of income to fixed charges of Textron Inc. including all majority-owned subsidiaries |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
101
|
|
The following materials from Textron Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 2, 2011,
formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEXTRON INC.
|
|
Date: July 29, 2011 |
/s/ Richard L. Yates
|
|
|
Richard L. Yates |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
(principal accounting officer) |
|
32
LIST OF EXHIBITS
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of ratio of income to fixed charges of Textron Inc. Manufacturing Group |
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Computation of ratio of income to fixed charges of Textron Inc. including all majority-owned subsidiaries |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
101
|
|
The following materials from Textron Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
July 2, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated
Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows and (iv) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
33