e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended
March 31,
2011
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Transition Period From
to
|
001-33289
Commission File Number
ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
N/A
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
P.O. Box HM
2267
Windsor Place,
3rd
Floor
18 Queen Street
Hamilton HM JX
Bermuda
(Address of principal executive
office, including zip code)
(441) 292-3645
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 4, 2011, the registrant had outstanding
13,698,066 ordinary shares, par value $1.00 per share.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
As
of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share
data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments,
available-for-sale,
at fair value (amortized cost: 2011 $nil
2010 $7,209)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,263
|
|
Short-term investments, trading, at fair value
|
|
|
425,727
|
|
|
|
507,978
|
|
Fixed maturities,
available-for-sale,
at fair value (amortized cost: 2011 $974,385;
2010 $1,068,540)
|
|
|
1,006,350
|
|
|
|
1,094,947
|
|
Fixed maturities, trading, at fair value
|
|
|
913,847
|
|
|
|
524,122
|
|
Equities, trading, at fair value
|
|
|
63,655
|
|
|
|
60,082
|
|
Other investments, at fair value
|
|
|
233,878
|
|
|
|
234,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
2,643,457
|
|
|
|
2,429,106
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
630,386
|
|
|
|
799,154
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
570,815
|
|
|
|
656,200
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
23,884
|
|
|
|
19,980
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
20,208
|
|
|
|
24,790
|
|
Income taxes recoverable
|
|
|
6,458
|
|
|
|
7,968
|
|
Reinsurance balances receivable
|
|
|
1,006,627
|
|
|
|
961,442
|
|
Funds held by reinsured companies
|
|
|
244,959
|
|
|
|
274,699
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
21,222
|
|
|
|
21,222
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
63,028
|
|
|
|
41,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
5,231,044
|
|
|
$
|
5,235,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
3,394,988
|
|
|
$
|
3,291,275
|
|
Reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
191,434
|
|
|
|
231,435
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
41,168
|
|
|
|
94,390
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
28,498
|
|
|
|
50,075
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
204,430
|
|
|
|
245,278
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
157,097
|
|
|
|
107,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
4,017,615
|
|
|
|
4,020,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized, issued and fully paid, par value $1 each (authorized
2011: 156,000,000; 2010: 156,000,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares (issued and outstanding 2011: 12,983,532;
2010:12,940,021)
|
|
|
12,984
|
|
|
|
12,940
|
|
Non-voting convertible ordinary shares (issued 2011: 2,972,892;
2010: 2,972,892)
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
Treasury shares at cost (non-voting convertible ordinary shares
2011: 2,972,892; 2010: 2,972,892)
|
|
|
(421,559
|
)
|
|
|
(421,559
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
668,751
|
|
|
|
667,907
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
41,920
|
|
|
|
35,017
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
654,646
|
|
|
|
651,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Enstar Group Limited Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
959,715
|
|
|
|
948,421
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
253,714
|
|
|
|
267,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
1,213,429
|
|
|
|
1,215,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
5,231,044
|
|
|
$
|
5,235,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
1
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
For
the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2011 and
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
|
|
|
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting fees
|
|
$
|
4,036
|
|
|
$
|
14,128
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
18,542
|
|
|
|
26,121
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
Gain on bargain purchase
|
|
|
13,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,051
|
|
|
|
42,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses
|
|
|
(2,612
|
)
|
|
|
(1,942
|
)
|
Reduction in provisions for bad debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,339
|
)
|
Reduction in provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
(11,537
|
)
|
|
|
(8,965
|
)
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
10,077
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,072
|
)
|
|
|
(9,596
|
)
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
10,382
|
|
|
|
15,190
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
17,750
|
|
|
|
10,487
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
Net foreign exchange loss
|
|
|
7,334
|
|
|
|
7,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,360
|
|
|
|
26,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND SHARE OF NET EARNINGS OF PARTLY
OWNED COMPANY
|
|
|
5,691
|
|
|
|
16,388
|
|
INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
(5,922
|
)
|
SHARE OF NET EARNINGS OF PARTLY OWNED COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
|
17,616
|
|
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
(1,695
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED
|
|
$
|
3,503
|
|
|
$
|
15,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE BASIC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Enstar Group Limited ordinary
shareholders
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE DILUTED:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Enstar Group Limited ordinary
shareholders
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
12,945,838
|
|
|
|
13,619,741
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
13,220,332
|
|
|
|
13,831,697
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
2
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
For
the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2011 and
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS
|
|
$
|
5,074
|
|
|
$
|
17,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on investments arising during the period
|
|
|
8,736
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net realized and unrealized
gains included in net earnings
|
|
|
(3,368
|
)
|
|
|
(2,202
|
)
|
Decrease in defined benefit pension liability
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
2,206
|
|
|
|
5,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
7,846
|
|
|
|
4,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
12,920
|
|
|
|
21,746
|
|
Less comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(2,514
|
)
|
|
|
(3,160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED
|
|
$
|
10,406
|
|
|
$
|
18,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Share Capital Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
12,940
|
|
|
$
|
13,581
|
|
Issue of shares
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Share awards granted/vested
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
12,984
|
|
|
$
|
13,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital Non-Voting Convertible Ordinary
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning and end of period
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning and end of period
|
|
$
|
(421,559
|
)
|
|
$
|
(421,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
667,907
|
|
|
$
|
721,120
|
|
Share awards granted/vested
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
5,286
|
|
Issue of shares
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Amortization of share awards
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
668,751
|
|
|
$
|
726,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Attributable to Enstar
Group Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
35,017
|
|
|
$
|
8,709
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
3,887
|
|
Net movement in unrealized holdings gains (losses) on investments
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
|
(1,221
|
)
|
Decrease in defined benefit pension liability
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
41,920
|
|
|
$
|
11,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
651,143
|
|
|
$
|
477,057
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Enstar Group Limited
|
|
|
3,503
|
|
|
|
15,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
654,646
|
|
|
$
|
492,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
267,400
|
|
|
$
|
274,271
|
|
Return of capital
|
|
|
(16,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,010
|
)
|
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
Net movement in unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
253,714
|
|
|
$
|
271,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
4
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
For
the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2011 and
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
5,074
|
|
|
$
|
17,616
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash flows used in
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on bargain purchase
|
|
|
(13,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share of undistributed net earnings of partly owned company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,150
|
)
|
Net realized and unrealized investment gain
|
|
|
(3,368
|
)
|
|
|
(2,202
|
)
|
Share of net gain from other investments
|
|
|
(2,993
|
)
|
|
|
(7,797
|
)
|
Other items
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
(1,878
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
Amortization of bond premiums and discounts
|
|
|
4,538
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
Net movement of trading securities held on behalf of
policyholders
|
|
|
7,110
|
|
|
|
3,342
|
|
Sales and maturities of trading securities
|
|
|
374,473
|
|
|
|
32,106
|
|
Purchases of trading securities
|
|
|
(654,563
|
)
|
|
|
(127,351
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance balances receivable
|
|
|
(43,567
|
)
|
|
|
(149,686
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
11,793
|
|
|
|
(18,204
|
)
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
90,505
|
|
|
|
145,230
|
|
Reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
(40,079
|
)
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(51,265
|
)
|
|
|
(17,638
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
26,048
|
|
|
|
(12,744
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in operating activities
|
|
|
(290,354
|
)
|
|
|
(142,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(7,949
|
)
|
|
|
157,184
|
|
Sales and maturities of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
101,109
|
|
|
|
40,993
|
|
Purchase of
held-to-maturity
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(381,817
|
)
|
Maturity of
held-to-maturity
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,960
|
|
Movement in restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
85,384
|
|
|
|
(55,479
|
)
|
Funding of other investments
|
|
|
(4,108
|
)
|
|
|
(3,048
|
)
|
Redemption of bond funds
|
|
|
10,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
184,429
|
|
|
|
(75,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of loans
|
|
|
(40,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of capital to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(16,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in financing activities
|
|
|
(56,700
|
)
|
|
|
(6,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT
|
|
|
(6,143
|
)
|
|
|
19,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(168,768
|
)
|
|
|
(204,520
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
799,154
|
|
|
|
1,266,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
630,386
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
25,254
|
|
|
$
|
15,372
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
2,231
|
|
|
$
|
3,687
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
5
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(Tabular information expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars
except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
BASIS OF
PREPARATION AND CONSOLIDATION
|
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements
have not been audited. These statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for
interim financial information and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of management, these financial
statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
of the Companys financial position and results of
operations as at the end of and for the periods presented.
Results of operations for subsidiaries acquired are included
from the dates of their acquisition by the Company. The results
of operations for any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of the results for a full year. Inter-company
accounts and transactions have been eliminated. In these notes,
the terms we, us, our, or
the Company refer to Enstar Group Limited and its
direct and indirect subsidiaries. The following information
should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Adoption
of New Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the new
guidance issued by the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB), which provides additional guidance for
performing Step 1 of the test for goodwill impairment when an
entity has reporting units with zero or negative carrying
values. As of March 31, 2011, none of the Companys
reporting units were at risk of failing Step 1 of the test
for goodwill impairment. Under the new guidance, Step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test must be performed when adverse
qualitative factors indicate that goodwill is more likely than
not impaired. The adoption of the revised guidance did not have
a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the new
guidance issued by FASB, which specifies that if a public entity
presents comparative financial statements, the entity should
disclose, in its supplementary pro-forma information, revenue
and earnings of the combined entity as though the business
combination that occurred during the current year had occurred
as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting
period only. The adoption of the revised guidance did not have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The Company has determined that all other recently issued
accounting pronouncements will not have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements, or do not apply to its
operations.
The Company accounts for acquisitions using the purchase method
of accounting, which requires that the acquirer record the
assets and liabilities acquired at their estimated fair value.
The fair values of reinsurance assets and liabilities acquired
are derived from probability weighted ranges of the associated
projected cash flows, based on actuarially prepared information
and managements run-off strategy. Any amendment to the
fair values resulting from changes in such information or
strategy will be recognized when the changes occur.
Laguna
On March 25, 2011, the Company, through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Kenmare Holdings Ltd. (Kenmare),
completed the acquisition of Laguna Life Limited, formerly known
as CitiLife Financial Limited (Laguna), from
Citigroup Insurance Holding Corporation (Citigroup),
an affiliate of Citigroup Inc. Laguna is an Ireland-based life
insurer that is in run-off. The purchase price was
15.0 million (approximately $21.2 million) and
was funded from available cash on hand. The previously disclosed
purchase price of 30.0 million (approximately $42.4
6
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
ACQUISITIONS (contd)
|
million) was reduced, prior to completion of the acquisition,
after Citigroup received approval from Lagunas regulator
to distribute 15.0 million (approximately $21.2
million) to its shareholders.
The purchase price and fair value of the assets acquired in the
Laguna acquisition were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
21,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired at fair value
|
|
$
|
34,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of net assets over purchase price (gain on bargain
purchase)
|
|
$
|
(13,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gain on bargain purchase of approximately
$13.1 million, relating to the acquisition of Laguna, arose
primarily as a result of the reassessment by the Company, upon
acquisition, of the total required estimated costs to manage the
business to expiry. The Companys assessment of costs was
lower than the acquired costs recorded by the vendor in the
financial statements of Laguna.
The following summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
13,274
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments, trading
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
Fixed maturities, trading
|
|
|
30,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
31,919
|
|
Reinsurance balances receivable
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(11,898
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired at fair value
|
|
$
|
34,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From March 25, 2011, the date of acquisition, to
March 31, 2011, the Company has recorded $nil revenues and
net earnings related to Laguna in its consolidated statement of
earnings.
Clarendon
On December 22, 2010, the Company, through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Clarendon Holdings, Inc., entered into a definitive
agreement for the purchase of Clarendon National Insurance
Company (Clarendon) from Clarendon Insurance Group,
Inc., an affiliate of Hannover Re. Clarendon is a New
Jersey-domiciled insurer that is in run-off. The purchase price
is approximately $200 million and will be financed in part
by a bank loan facility provided by a London-based bank entered
into on March 4, 2011 and in part from available cash on
hand. Completion of the transaction is conditioned on, among
other things, regulatory approval and satisfaction of various
customary closing conditions. The transaction is expected to
close in the second quarter of 2011.
|
|
3.
|
SIGNIFICANT
NEW BUSINESS
|
Shelbourne RITC Transactions
In December 2007, Enstar, in conjunction with JCF FPK I L.P.
(JCF FPK) and a newly-hired executive management
team, formed U.K.-based Shelbourne Group Limited
(Shelbourne) to invest in Reinsurance to Close or
RITC transactions (the transferring of liabilities
from one Lloyds syndicate to another) with Lloyds of
London insurance and reinsurance syndicates in run-off. The
Company owns approximately 56.8% of Shelbourne,
7
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
SIGNIFICANT
NEW BUSINESS (contd)
|
which in turn owns 100% of Shelbourne Syndicate Services
Limited, the Managing Agency for Lloyds Syndicate 2008, a
syndicate approved by Lloyds of London on
December 16, 2007 to undertake RITC transactions with
Lloyds syndicates in run-off.
JCF FPK is a joint investment program between Fox-Pitt, Kelton,
Cochran, Caronia & Waller (USA) LLC (FPK)
and J.C. Flowers II, L.P. (the Flowers Fund). The
Flowers Fund is a private investment fund advised by J.C.
Flowers & Co. LLC. J. Christopher Flowers, one of the
Companys largest shareholders and formerly a member of the
Companys board of directors, is the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of J.C. Flowers & Co. LLC. In
addition, an affiliate of the Flowers Fund controlled
approximately 41% of FPK until its sale of FPK in December 2009.
In February 2011, Lloyds Syndicate 2008 entered into RITC
agreements with two Lloyds syndicates with total gross
insurance reserves of approximately $129.6 million. The
capital commitment to Lloyds Syndicate 2008 with respect
to these two RITC agreements amounted to £21.3 million
(approximately $34.1 million), which was fully funded by
the Company from available cash on hand.
|
|
4.
|
RESTRICTED
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents were $570.8 million
and $656.2 million as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. The restricted cash and
cash equivalents are used as collateral against letters of
credit and as guarantees under trust agreements. Letters of
credit are issued to ceding insurers as security for the
obligations of insurance subsidiaries under reinsurance
agreements with those ceding insurers.
Available-for-sale
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the
Companys fixed maturity securities and short-term
investments classified as
available-for-sale
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Non-OTTI
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
63,952
|
|
|
$
|
662
|
|
|
$
|
(131
|
)
|
|
$
|
64,483
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
236,004
|
|
|
|
11,308
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
247,307
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
612,486
|
|
|
|
17,939
|
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
630,089
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
18,839
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
19,250
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
17,178
|
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
18,882
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
25,926
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
26,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
974,385
|
|
|
$
|
32,837
|
|
|
$
|
(872
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,006,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Non-OTTI
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
65,115
|
|
|
$
|
766
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
65,789
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
248,487
|
|
|
|
8,832
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
257,005
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
695,372
|
|
|
|
16,513
|
|
|
|
(1,615
|
)
|
|
|
710,270
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
20,036
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
20,107
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
19,667
|
|
|
|
2,083
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
21,739
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
27,072
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
27,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,749
|
|
|
$
|
29,073
|
|
|
$
|
(2,612
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,102,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize the Companys fixed maturity
securities and short-term investments classified as
available-for-sale
in an unrealized loss position as well as the aggregate fair
value and gross unrealized loss by length of time the security
has continuously been in an unrealized loss position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,910
|
|
|
$
|
(131
|
)
|
|
$
|
32,910
|
|
|
$
|
(131
|
)
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,995
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
4,995
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
23,241
|
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
18,403
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
41,644
|
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
5,324
|
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5,535
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,206
|
|
|
$
|
(678
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,995
|
|
|
$
|
(194
|
)
|
|
$
|
89,201
|
|
|
$
|
(872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,976
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,777
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
7,710
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
31,128
|
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
38,838
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
22,039
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
107,735
|
|
|
|
(1,297
|
)
|
|
|
129,774
|
|
|
|
(1,615
|
)
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
11,274
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
13,642
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
10,554
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,641
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,002
|
|
|
$
|
(874
|
)
|
|
$
|
174,716
|
|
|
$
|
(1,738
|
)
|
|
$
|
218,718
|
|
|
$
|
(2,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the number
of securities classified as
available-for-sale
in an unrealized loss position was 77 and 136, respectively,
with a fair value of $89.2 million and $218.7 million,
respectively. Of these securities, the number of securities that
had been in an unrealized loss position for twelve
9
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
months or longer was 40 and 32, respectively. As of
March 31, 2011, none of these securities were considered to
be other than temporarily impaired. The Company has no intent to
sell and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be
required to sell these securities before their fair values
recover above the adjusted cost. The unrealized losses from
these securities were not as a result of credit, collateral or
structural issues.
The contractual maturities of the Companys fixed maturity
securities and short-term investments, classified as
available-for-sale,
are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
387,872
|
|
|
$
|
397,483
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
518,079
|
|
|
|
537,321
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
%
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
3,846
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
912,442
|
|
|
|
941,879
|
|
|
|
93.6
|
%
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
18,839
|
|
|
|
19,250
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
17,178
|
|
|
|
18,882
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
25,926
|
|
|
|
26,339
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
974,385
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,350
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
373,683
|
|
|
$
|
379,203
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
625,463
|
|
|
|
643,252
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
%
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
5,307
|
|
|
|
5,539
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
4,521
|
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008,974
|
|
|
|
1,033,064
|
|
|
|
93.7
|
%
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
20,036
|
|
|
|
20,107
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
19,667
|
|
|
|
21,739
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
27,072
|
|
|
|
27,300
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,749
|
|
|
$
|
1,102,210
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the
credit ratings (provided by major rating agencies) of the
Companys fixed maturity securities and short-term
investments classified as
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
391,116
|
|
|
$
|
406,612
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
255,904
|
|
|
|
263,424
|
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
A
|
|
|
263,827
|
|
|
|
270,869
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
BBB or lower
|
|
|
63,150
|
|
|
|
64,934
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Not Rated
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
974,385
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,350
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
405,682
|
|
|
$
|
416,526
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
267,917
|
|
|
|
273,500
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
A
|
|
|
332,401
|
|
|
|
341,447
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
%
|
BBB or lower
|
|
|
69,359
|
|
|
|
70,274
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Not Rated
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,749
|
|
|
$
|
1,102,210
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
The estimated fair values of investments in fixed maturity
securities, short-term investments and equities classified as
trading securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
200,531
|
|
|
$
|
162,014
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
205,083
|
|
|
|
129,861
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
814,112
|
|
|
|
637,114
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
82,507
|
|
|
|
82,399
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
29,857
|
|
|
|
17,102
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
5,917
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
63,655
|
|
|
|
60,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,403,229
|
|
|
$
|
1,092,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the
credit ratings (provided by major rating agencies) of the
Companys fixed maturity securities and short-term
investments classified as trading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
555,704
|
|
|
|
41.5
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
224,801
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
A
|
|
|
479,129
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
BBB or lower
|
|
|
64,528
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Not Rated
|
|
|
15,412
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,339,574
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
395,881
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
177,302
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
A
|
|
|
400,314
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
BBB or lower
|
|
|
51,983
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Not Rated
|
|
|
6,620
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,032,100
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Private equities
|
|
$
|
110,485
|
|
|
$
|
104,109
|
|
Bond funds
|
|
|
93,916
|
|
|
|
102,279
|
|
Hedge fund
|
|
|
23,230
|
|
|
|
22,037
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,247
|
|
|
|
6,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
233,878
|
|
|
$
|
234,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company
had $110.5 million and $104.1 million, respectively,
of other investments recorded in private equities, which
represented 2.9% and 2.4% of total investments and cash and cash
equivalents at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. All of the Companys investments in private
equities are subject to restrictions on redemptions and sales
that are determined by the governing documents and limit the
Companys ability to liquidate these investments in the
short term. Due to a lag in the valuations reported by the
managers, the Company records changes in the investment value
with up to a three-month lag. These investments are accounted
for at estimated fair value determined by the Companys
proportionate share of the net asset value of the investee
reduced by any impairment charges. As at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the Company had unfunded capital
commitments relating to its other investments of
$80.8 million and $84.7 million, respectively. See
Note 12 for details of other investments with related
parties.
12
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
Our bond fund holdings comprise a number of positions in
diversified bond mutual funds managed by third-party managers.
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment Process
The Company assesses whether declines in the fair value of its
fixed maturity investments classified as
available-for-sale
represent impairments that are
other-than-temporary
by reviewing each fixed maturity investment that is impaired
and: (1) determining if the Company has the intent to sell
the fixed maturity investment or (2) determining if it is
more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell
the fixed maturity investment before its anticipated recovery;
and (3) assessing whether a credit loss exists, that is,
where the Company expects that the present value of the cash
flows expected to be collected from the fixed maturity
investment is less than the amortized cost basis of the
investment.
The Company had no planned sales of its fixed maturity
investments classified as
available-for-sale
as at March 31, 2011. In assessing whether it is more
likely than not that the Company will be required to sell a
fixed maturity investment before its anticipated recovery, the
Company considers various factors including its future cash flow
requirements, legal and regulatory requirements, the level of
its cash, cash equivalents, short term investments and fixed
maturity investments classified as available-for-sale in an
unrealized gain position, and other relevant factors. For the
three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company did not
recognize any
other-than-temporary
impairments due to required sales.
In evaluating credit losses, the Company considers a variety of
factors in the assessment of a fixed maturity investment
including: (1) the time period during which there has been
a significant decline below cost; (2) the extent of the
decline below cost and par; (3) the potential for the fixed
maturity investment to recover in value; (4) an analysis of
the financial condition of the issuer; (5) the rating of
the issuer; and (6) failure of the issuer of the fixed
maturity investment to make scheduled interest or principal
payments.
Based on the factors described above, the Company determined
that, as at March 31, 2011, no credit losses existed.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the price at which to sell an asset or
transfer a liability (i.e. the exit price) in an
orderly transaction between market participants. The Company
uses a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to
quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to
unobservable data. The hierarchy is broken down into three
levels as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuations based on unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Company has the ability to access. Valuation
adjustments and block discounts are not applied to Level 1
instruments.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuations based on quoted prices in
active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices
for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or for
which significant inputs are observable (e.g. interest rates,
yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities,
etc.) or can be corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are
unobservable and significant to the overall fair value
measurement. The unobservable inputs reflect the Companys
own assumptions about assumptions that market participants might
use.
|
The following is a summary of valuation techniques or models the
Company uses to measure fair value by asset and liability
classes.
13
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
Fixed Maturity Investments
The Companys fixed maturity portfolio is managed by the
Companys Chief Investment Officer and outside investment
advisors. The Company uses inputs from nationally recognized
pricing services, including pricing vendors, index providers and
broker-dealers to estimate fair value measurements for all of
its fixed maturity investments. These pricing services include
FT Interactive Data, Barclays Capital Aggregate Index (formerly
Lehman Index), Reuters Pricing Service and others.
In general, the pricing services use observable market inputs
including, but not limited to, investment yields, credit risks
and spreads, benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities,
non-binding broker-dealer quotes, reported trades and sector
groupings to determine the fair value. In addition, pricing
services use valuation models, such as an Option Adjusted Spread
model, to develop prepayment and interest rate scenarios. The
Option Adjusted Spread model is commonly used to estimate fair
value for securities such as mortgage-backed and asset-backed
securities.
The following describes the techniques generally used to
determine the fair value of the Companys fixed maturities
by asset class.
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency securities consist of securities
issued by the U.S. Treasury and mortgage pass- through
agencies such as the Federal National Mortgage Association, the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and other agencies. The
significant inputs include the spread above the risk-free yield
curve, reported trades and broker-dealer quotes. These are
considered to be observable market inputs and, therefore, the
fair values of these securities are classified within
Level 2.
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. government
securities consist of bonds issued by
non-U.S. governments
and agencies along with supranational organizations. The
significant inputs include the spread above the risk-free yield
curve, reported trades and broker-dealer quotes. These are
considered to be observable market inputs and, therefore, the
fair values of these securities are classified within
Level 2.
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities consist primarily of investment-grade debt
of a wide variety of corporate issuers and industries. The fair
values of these securities are determined using the spread above
the risk-free yield curve, reported trades, broker-dealer
quotes, benchmark yields, and industry and market indicators.
These are considered observable market inputs and, therefore,
the fair values of these securities are classified within
Level 2. Where pricing is unavailable from pricing
services, the Company obtains non-binding quotes from
broker-dealers. This is generally the case when there is a low
volume of trading activity and current transactions are not
orderly. In this event, securities are classified within
Level 3. As at March 31, 2011, the Company had one
corporate security classified as Level 3.
|
|
|
|
Municipal securities consist primarily of bonds issued by
U.S.-domiciled
state and municipal entities. The fair values of these
securities are determined using the spread above the risk-free
yield curve, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes and benchmark
yields. These are considered observable market inputs and,
therefore, the fair values of these securities are classified
within Level 2.
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities consist primarily of investment-grade
bonds backed by pools of loans with a variety of underlying
collateral. The significant inputs used to determine the fair
value of these securities include the spread above the risk-free
yield curve, reported trades, benchmark yields, broker-dealer
quotes, prepayment speeds, and default rates. These are
considered observable market inputs and, therefore, the fair
values of these securities are classified within Level 2.
|
|
|
|
Residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities include
both agency and non-agency originated securities. The
significant inputs used to determine the fair value of these
securities include the spread above the risk-free yield curve,
reported trades, benchmark yields, broker-dealer quotes,
prepayment speeds, and
|
14
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
|
|
|
|
|
default rates. These are considered observable market inputs
and, therefore, the fair values of these securities are
classified within Level 2. Where pricing is unavailable
from pricing services, the Company obtains non-binding quotes
from broker-dealers. This is generally the case when there is a
low volume of trading activity and current transactions are not
orderly. In this event, securities are classified within
Level 3. As at March 31, 2011, the Company had one
commercial mortgage-backed security classified as Level 3.
|
To validate the techniques or models used by the pricing
services, the Company compares the fair value estimates to its
knowledge of the current market and challenges any prices deemed
not to be representative of fair value.
As of March 31, 2011, there were no material differences
between the prices obtained from the pricing services and the
fair value estimates developed by the Company.
Equity Securities
The Companys equity securities are managed by two external
advisors. The Company uses nationally recognized pricing
services, including pricing vendors, index providers and
broker-dealers to estimate fair value measurements for all of
its equity securities. These pricing services include FT
Interactive Data and others.
The Company has categorized all of its investments in common
stock as Level 1 investments because the fair values of
these securities are based on quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities. The Company has categorized
all of its investments in preferred stock as Level 2
(except one which was categorized as Level 3) because
their fair value estimates are based on observable market data.
Other Investments
For its investments in private equities, the Company measures
fair value by obtaining the most recently published net asset
value as advised by the external fund manager or third-party
administrator. The use of net asset value as an estimate of the
fair value for investments in certain entities that calculate
net asset value is a permitted practical expedient. The
Companys private equity investments are mainly in the
financial services industry. The fund advisors continue to
evaluate the overall market environment, as well as specific
areas in the financial services sector, in order to identify
segments they believe will offer the most attractive investment
opportunities. The financial statements of each fund generally
are audited annually under U.S. GAAP, using fair value
measurement for the underlying investments. For all
publicly-traded companies within the funds, the Company has
valued those investments based on the latest share price. The
value of Affirmative Investment LLC (in which the Company owns a
non-voting 7% membership interest) is based on the market value
of the shares of Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc., a
publicly-traded company.
All of the Companys investments in private equities are
subject to restrictions on redemptions and sales that are
determined by the governing documents and limit the
Companys ability to liquidate those investments in the
short term. These restrictions have been in place since the
initial investments. The capital commitments are discussed in
detail in Note 12 to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements. The Company has classified private
equities as Level 3 investments because they reflect the
Companys own judgment about the assumptions that market
participants might use.
For its investment in the hedge fund, the Company measures fair
value by obtaining the most recently published net asset value
as advised by the external fund manager or third-party
administrator. The use of net asset value as an estimate of the
fair value for investments in certain entities that calculate
net asset value is a permitted practical expedient. The adviser
of the fund intends to seek attractive risk-adjusted total
returns for the funds investors by acquiring, originating,
and actively managing a diversified portfolio of debt
securities, with a focus on various forms of asset-backed
securities and loans. The fund will focus on investments that
the adviser believes to be
15
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
fundamentally undervalued with current market prices that are
believed to be compelling relative to intrinsic value. The units
of account that are valued by the Company are its interests in
the fund and not the underlying holdings of such fund. Thus, the
inputs used by the Company to value its investment in the fund
may differ from the inputs used to value the underlying holdings
of such fund. The hedge fund is not currently eligible for
redemption due to imposed
lock-up
periods of three years from the time of the initial investment.
Once eligible, redemptions will be permitted quarterly with
90 days notice. There are no unfunded capital commitments
in relation to the hedge fund. The investment in the fund is
classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
The bond funds in which the Company invests have been classified
as Level 2 investments because their fair value is
estimated using the net asset value reported by Bloomberg and
they have daily liquidity.
Fair
Value Measurements
In accordance with the provisions of the Fair Value Measurement
and Disclosure topic of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification, the Company has categorized its investments that
are recorded at fair value among levels as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,014
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,014
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,390
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,443,650
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
1,444,201
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,757
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,777
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
48,739
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,256
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
59,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
63,655
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,916
|
|
|
|
139,962
|
|
|
|
233,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
59,680
|
|
|
$
|
2,438,327
|
|
|
$
|
145,450
|
|
|
$
|
2,643,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
227,803
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
227,803
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,866
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,346,854
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
1,347,384
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,506
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,927
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
38,841
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,613
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
56,369
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
3,575
|
|
|
|
60,082
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,279
|
|
|
|
132,435
|
|
|
|
234,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
56,369
|
|
|
$
|
2,235,283
|
|
|
$
|
137,454
|
|
|
$
|
2,429,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for all investments measured at fair value
on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs during the three
months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of January 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
|
$
|
132,435
|
|
|
$
|
3,575
|
|
|
$
|
137,454
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Total realized and unrealized losses through earnings
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
139,962
|
|
|
$
|
3,975
|
|
|
$
|
145,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of net gains/(losses) for the period included in
earnings attributable to the fair value of changes in assets
still held at March 31, 2011 was $2.5 million. Of this
amount, $0.5 million was included in net realized and
unrealized gains and $2.0 million was included in net
investment income.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for all investments measured at fair value
on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs during the three
months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
81,801
|
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
85,742
|
|
Net purchases (sales and distributions)
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,628
|
|
Total realized and unrealized losses through earnings
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
6,444
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
6,710
|
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,336
|
|
|
$
|
91,294
|
|
|
$
|
3,450
|
|
|
$
|
96,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
The amount of net gains for the period included in earnings
attributable to the fair value of changes in assets still held
at March 31, 2010 was $7.9 million. Of this amount,
$0.3 million was included in net realized and unrealized
gains and $7.6 million was included in net investment
income.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
proceeds from the sales and maturities of
available-for-sale
securities were $101.1 and $41.0 million, respectively.
Gross realized gains on the sale of
available-for-sale
securities were, for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010, $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million,
respectively, and gross realized losses on the sale of
available-for-sale
securities, were $0.3 million and $nil, respectively.
Unrealized gains on trading securities were $2.0 million and
$1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
Restricted
Investments
The Company is required to maintain investments on deposit with
various regulatory authorities to support its insurance and
reinsurance operations. The investments on deposit are available
to settle insurance and reinsurance liabilities. The Company
also utilizes trust accounts to collateralize business with its
insurance and reinsurance counterparties. These trust accounts
generally take the place of letter of credit requirements. The
investments held in trust as collateral are primarily highly
rated fixed maturity securities. The carrying value of the
Companys restricted investments as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Assets used for collateral in trust for third-party agreements
|
|
$
|
452,444
|
|
|
$
|
371,834
|
|
Deposits with regulatory authorities
|
|
|
33,064
|
|
|
|
33,970
|
|
Others
|
|
|
63,722
|
|
|
|
62,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
549,230
|
|
|
$
|
468,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS
|
In October 2010, the Company entered into a foreign currency
forward exchange contract as part of its overall foreign
currency risk management strategy. On the value date,
June 30, 2011, the Company will sell AU$45.0 million
for $42.5 million. The contract exchange rate is AU$1 for
$0.9439. As at March 31, 2011, the change in the fair value
of the contract was $(0.4) million, the effect of which the
Company has recognized as a foreign exchange loss included as
part of its net earnings.
|
|
7.
|
REINSURANCE
BALANCES RECEIVABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Recoverable from reinsurers on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding losses
|
|
$
|
460,464
|
|
|
$
|
425,336
|
|
Losses incurred but not reported
|
|
|
162,325
|
|
|
|
141,118
|
|
Fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(39,311
|
)
|
|
|
(41,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
583,478
|
|
|
|
525,440
|
|
Paid losses
|
|
|
423,149
|
|
|
|
436,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,627
|
|
|
$
|
961,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
REINSURANCE
BALANCES RECEIVABLE (contd)
|
The fair value adjustment, determined on acquisition of
reinsurance subsidiaries, was based on the estimated timing of
loss and loss adjustment expense recoveries and an assumed
interest rate equivalent to a risk free rate for securities with
similar duration to the reinsurance receivables acquired plus a
spread to reflect credit risk, and is amortized over the
estimated recovery period, as adjusted for accelerations on
commutation settlements, using the constant yield method.
The Companys acquired reinsurance subsidiaries, prior to
acquisition, used retrocessional agreements to reduce their
exposure to the risk of reinsurance assumed. The Company remains
liable to the extent that retrocessionaires do not meet their
obligations under these agreements, and therefore, the Company
evaluates and monitors concentration of credit risk among its
reinsurers. Provisions are made for amounts considered
potentially uncollectible.
At March 31, 2011, the Companys top 10 reinsurers
accounted for 72.7% (December 31, 2010: 75.5%) of
reinsurance recoverables (which includes loss reserves
recoverable and recoverables on paid losses) and included
$102.9 million of incurred but not reported, or IBNR,
recoverable (December 31, 2010: $99.6 million).
Reinsurance recoverables by reinsurer were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Recoverable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Recoverable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Top 10 reinsurers
|
|
$
|
731,955
|
|
|
|
72.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
726,201
|
|
|
|
75.5
|
%
|
Other reinsurers balances > $1 million
|
|
|
235,843
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
198,737
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
Other reinsurers balances < $1 million
|
|
|
38,829
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
36,504
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,006,627
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
961,442
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the provision
for uncollectible reinsurance relating to losses recoverable was
$419.0 million and $381.4 million, respectively. To
estimate the provision for uncollectible reinsurance
recoverables, the reinsurance recoverables are first allocated
to applicable reinsurers. This determination is based on a
detailed process rather than an estimate, although an element of
judgment is applied. As part of this process, ceded IBNR is
allocated by reinsurer.
The Company uses a detailed analysis to estimate uncollectible
reinsurance. The primary components of the analysis are
reinsurance recoverable balances by reinsurer and bad debt
provisions applied to these balances to determine the portion of
a reinsurers balance deemed to be uncollectible. These
provisions require considerable judgment and are determined
using the current rating, or rating equivalent, of each
reinsurer (in order to determine their ability to settle the
reinsurance balances), as well as other key considerations and
assumptions, such as claims and coverage issues.
As at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
reinsurance receivables with a carrying value of
$405.2 million and $398.8 million, respectively, were
each associated with two reinsurers which represented 10% or
more of total reinsurance balances receivable. As at
March 31, 2011, the two reinsurers had credit ratings of
AA- or higher. In the event that all or any of the reinsuring
companies are unable to meet their obligations under existing
reinsurance agreements, the Company will be liable for such
defaulted amounts.
19
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
LOSSES
AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES
|
The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and
ending reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Losses incurred and paid are reflected net of reinsurance
recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance as at January 1
|
|
$
|
3,291,275
|
|
|
$
|
2,479,136
|
|
Less: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
525,440
|
|
|
|
347,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,765,835
|
|
|
|
2,131,408
|
|
Effect of exchange rate movement
|
|
|
34,372
|
|
|
|
(35,975
|
)
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
(4,072
|
)
|
|
|
(9,596
|
)
|
Net losses paid
|
|
|
(88,131
|
)
|
|
|
(83,225
|
)
|
Acquired on purchase of subsidiaries
|
|
|
10,439
|
|
|
|
222,042
|
|
Retroactive reinsurance contracts assumed
|
|
|
93,067
|
|
|
|
230,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance as at March 31
|
|
|
2,811,510
|
|
|
|
2,455,043
|
|
Plus: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
583,478
|
|
|
|
435,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at March 31
|
|
$
|
3,394,988
|
|
|
$
|
2,890,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the components of the movement in the
net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net losses paid
|
|
$
|
(88,131
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83,225
|
)
|
Net change in case and loss adjustment expense reserves
|
|
|
83,430
|
|
|
|
78,854
|
|
Net change in incurred but not reported reserves
|
|
|
7,313
|
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
Reduction in provisions for bad debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,339
|
|
Reduction in provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
11,537
|
|
|
|
8,965
|
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(10,077
|
)
|
|
|
(6,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,072
|
|
|
$
|
9,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in case and loss adjustment expense reserves, or
LAE reserves, comprises the movement during the quarter in
specific case reserve liabilities as a result of claims
settlements or changes advised to the Company by its
policyholders and attorneys, less changes in case reserves
recoverable advised by the Company to its reinsurers as a result
of the settlement or movement of assumed claims. Net reduction
in IBNR represents the change in the Companys actuarial
estimates of losses incurred but not reported.
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of
$4.1 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $2.6 million and a reduction in
provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense liabilities
of $11.5 million, relating to 2011 run-off activity,
partially offset by the amortization, over the estimated payout
period, of fair value adjustments relating to companies acquired
amounting to $10.1 million.
20
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
LOSSES
AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT
EXPENSES (contd)
|
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$2.6 million comprised net incurred loss development of
$4.7 million and reductions in IBNR reserves of
$7.3 million.
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of
$9.6 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $1.9 million, a reduction in
aggregate provisions for bad debt of $5.3 million and a
reduction in provisions for unallocated loss and loss adjustment
expense liabilities of $9.0 million, relating to 2010
run-off activity, partially offset by the amortization, over the
estimated payout period, of fair value adjustments relating to
companies acquired amounting to $6.7 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$1.9 million comprised net incurred loss development of
$4.4 million and reductions in IBNR reserves of
$6.3 million. The reductions in provisions for bad debts of
$5.3 million resulted from the collection of receivables
against which bad debt provisions had been provided in earlier
periods.
The Companys long-term debt consists of loan facilities
used to partially finance certain of the Companys
acquisitions or significant new business transactions along with
a loan outstanding in relation to the share repurchase
agreements (the Repurchase Agreements) entered into
with three of its executives and certain trusts and a
corporation affiliated with the executives. The Unionamerica,
Knapton and Enstar Group Facilities and the Repurchase
Agreements are described in Note 11 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010.
Total amounts of loans payable outstanding as of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010 totaled $204.4 million and
$245.3 million, respectively, and were comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
Date of Facility
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Unionamerica Facility A
|
|
December 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
30,242
|
|
|
$
|
71,259
|
|
Unionamerica Facility B
|
|
December 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Knapton
|
|
April 20, 2010
|
|
|
21,528
|
|
|
|
21,532
|
|
Enstar Group Facility A
|
|
December 29, 2010
|
|
|
52,100
|
|
|
|
52,100
|
|
Enstar Group Facility B
|
|
December 29, 2010
|
|
|
62,900
|
|
|
|
62,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term bank debt
|
|
|
|
|
166,770
|
|
|
|
207,945
|
|
Repurchase Agreements
|
|
October 1, 2010
|
|
|
37,660
|
|
|
|
37,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans payable
|
|
|
|
$
|
204,430
|
|
|
$
|
245,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2011, the accrued interest outstanding of
$0.2 million relating to Unionamerica Facility B was
settled. In addition, on March 3, 2011, the Company repaid
$40.5 million of the outstanding loan balance of
Unionamerica Facility A.
On March 4, 2011, the Company, through Clarendon Holdings,
Inc., entered into a $106.5 million term facility agreement
(the Clarendon Facility) with a London-based bank.
The Clarendon Facility provides for a four-year term loan
facility, which will be available to be drawn to fund up to 50%
of the purchase price of Clarendon. As of March 31, 2011,
Clarendon Holdings, Inc. has not borrowed any of the amount
available under the Clarendon Facility. The Clarendon Facility
will be secured by a security interest in all of the assets of
Clarendon Holdings, Inc., as well as a first priority lien on
the stock of both Clarendon Holdings, Inc. and Clarendon.
Interest is payable at the end of each interest period chosen by
Clarendon Holdings, Inc. or, at the latest, each six months. The
interest rate is
21
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
LOANS
PAYABLE (contd)
|
LIBOR plus 2.75%. The Clarendon Facility is subject to various
financial and business covenants, including limitations on
mergers and consolidations, restrictions as to disposition of
stock, restrictions on the declaration and payment of dividends
and limitations on liens on the stock.
As of March 31, 2011, all of the covenants relating to the
Companys outstanding credit facilities were met.
The Companys share-based compensation plans provide for
the grant of various awards to its employees and to members of
the board of directors. These are described in Note 14 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010. The information below
includes both the employee and director components of the
Companys share-based compensation.
Employee stock awards for the three months ended March 31,
2011 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Fair
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
the Award
|
|
|
Nonvested January 1, 2011
|
|
|
153,930
|
|
|
$
|
13,019
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
67,767
|
|
|
|
5,625
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(17,767
|
)
|
|
|
(1,575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested March 31, 2011
|
|
|
203,930
|
|
|
$
|
20,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
2006-2010
Annual Incentive Compensation Program,
2011-2015
Annual Incentive Compensation Program and 2006 Equity Incentive
Plan
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, 16,328
and 78,664 shares were awarded to directors, officers and
employees under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The total values
of the awards for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 were $1.5 million and $5.4 million, respectively,
and were charged against the
2006-2010
Annual Incentive Compensation Program accrual established for
the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
On February 23, 2011, the Company adopted the Enstar Group
Limited
2011-2015
Annual Incentive Compensation Program.
In addition, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, 50,000 and 153,930 restricted shares were awarded to
certain employees under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The
total unrecognized compensation cost related to the non-vested
share awards as at March 31, 2011 and 2010 was
$12.5 million and $10.5 million, respectively. This
cost is expected to be recognized over the next 4.5 years.
Compensation costs of $0.5 million and $0.1 million
relating to the share award were recognized in the
Companys statement of earnings for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The accrued expense relating to the
2006-2010
Annual Incentive Compensation Program for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $nil and $2.8 million,
respectively.
|
|
(ii)
|
Enstar
Group Limited Employee Share Purchase Plan
|
On February 26, 2008, the Companys board of directors
approved the Amended and Restated Enstar Group Limited Employee
Share Purchase Plan (the Purchase Plan), and
subsequently, on June 11, 2008, the Companys
shareholders approved the Purchase Plan at the Annual General
Meeting.
22
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS (contd)
|
Compensation costs of less than $0.1 million relating to
the shares issued have been recognized in the Companys
statement of earnings for each of the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010. As at March 31, 2011,
15,593 shares have, in total, been issued to employees
under the Purchase Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Outstanding January 1, 2011
|
|
|
152,015
|
|
|
$
|
34.55
|
|
|
$
|
7,606
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(49,037
|
)
|
|
|
19.63
|
|
|
|
(3,709
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding March 31, 2011
|
|
|
102,978
|
|
|
$
|
41.61
|
|
|
$
|
5,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding and exercisable as of March 31,
2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ranges of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
Exercise
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Remaining
|
Prices
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
$40 - $60
|
|
|
102,978
|
|
|
$
|
41.65
|
|
|
|
2.5 years
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Deferred
Compensation and Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, 1,283
and 1,472 restricted share units, respectively, were credited to
the accounts of Non-Employee Directors under the Enstar Group
Limited Deferred Compensation and Ordinary Share Plan for
Non-Employee Directors.
The Company provides pension benefits to eligible employees
through various plans sponsored by the Company. All pension
plans, except as disclosed below, are structured as defined
contribution plans. Pension expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $1.1 million and
$0.9 million, respectively.
The Company acquired, as part of the acquisition of PW
Acquisition Company (PWAC) on July 20, 2010, a
noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the PWAC
Plan) that covers substantially all PWAC employees hired
before April 1, 2003 and provides pension and certain death
benefits. Effective April 1, 2004, PWAC froze the PWAC
Plan. As at the date of acquisition of PWAC by the Company, the
PWAC Plan had an unfunded liability of $6.7 million that
had been accrued by PWAC. Subsequent to acquisition, an
actuarial review was performed of the PWAC Plan which determined
that the PWAC Plans unfunded liability was
$8.1 million. As at March 31, 2011, PWAC had an
accrued liability of $7.9 million for the unfunded PWAC
Plan liability.
The Company recorded pension expense relating to the PWAC Plan,
for the three months ended March 31, 2011, of
$0.2 million.
23
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the comparison of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Enstar Group Limited
|
|
$
|
3,503
|
|
|
$
|
15,921
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
12,945,838
|
|
|
|
13,619,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to Enstar Group
Limited basic
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Enstar Group Limited
|
|
$
|
3,503
|
|
|
$
|
15,921
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
12,945,838
|
|
|
|
13,619,741
|
|
Share equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested shares
|
|
|
174,486
|
|
|
|
39,313
|
|
Restricted share units
|
|
|
17,489
|
|
|
|
14,397
|
|
Options
|
|
|
82,519
|
|
|
|
158,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
13,220,332
|
|
|
|
13,831,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to Enstar Group
Limited diluted
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The Company has entered into certain transactions with companies
and partnerships that are affiliated with J. Christopher
Flowers. Mr. Flowers is one of the largest shareholders of
the Company and formerly was a member of the Companys
board of directors.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company
funded $3.9 million of its remaining outstanding capital
commitment to entities affiliated with Mr. Flowers. The
Company had, as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, excluding its investment in Varadero International Ltd. (a
hedge fund affiliated with the Company and Mr. Flowers with
respect to which the Company has funded 100% of its capital
commitment), investments in entities affiliated with
Mr. Flowers with a total value of $102.4 million and
$96.1 million, respectively, and outstanding commitments to
entities managed by Mr. Flowers, as of those same dates, of
$80.7 million and $84.6 million, respectively. The
Companys outstanding commitments may be drawn down over
approximately the next five years.
As at March 31, 2011, related party investments associated
with Mr. Flowers accounted for 99.9% of the total unfunded
capital commitments of the Company and 53.7% of the total amount
of investments classified as other investments by the Company.
Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and March 31, 2010 was $0.6 million and
$5.9 million, respectively.
Under current Bermuda law, the Company and its Bermuda
subsidiaries are not required to pay any taxes in Bermuda on
their income or capital gains. On March 25, 2011, the
Company received confirmation from the Minister of Finance in
Bermuda that, in the event of any taxes being imposed, the
period for which the Company and its Bermuda subsidiaries will
be exempt from taxation in Bermuda would be extended until March
2035.
24
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has operating subsidiaries and branch operations in
the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States and Europe
and is subject to federal, foreign, state and local taxes in
those jurisdictions. In addition, certain distributions from
some foreign sources may be subject to withholding taxes.
The expected income tax provision for the foreign operations
computed on pre-tax income at the weighted average tax rate has
been calculated as the sum of the pre-tax income in each
jurisdiction multiplied by that jurisdictions applicable
statutory tax rate.
The actual income tax rate for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 differed from the amount computed
by applying the effective rate of 0% under Bermuda law to
earnings before income taxes as shown in the following
reconciliation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax
|
|
$
|
4,120
|
|
|
$
|
21,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected tax rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Foreign taxes at local expected rates
|
|
|
50.9
|
%
|
|
|
54.2
|
%
|
Benefit of loss carryovers
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)%
|
Change in uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.1
|
)%
|
Impact of Australian tax consolidation
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had net deferred tax assets of approximately
$8.3 million and $3.2 million as of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Deferred income
taxes arise from the recognition of temporary differences
between income determined for financial reporting purposes and
income tax purposes. The temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities
are net operating loss carryforwards, claims reserves, due
principally to the discounting for tax, and investments.
The Company has estimated future taxable income of its foreign
subsidiaries and has provided a valuation allowance in respect
of those loss carryforwards where it does not expect to realize
a benefit. The Company has considered all available evidence
using a more likely than not standard in determining
the amount of the valuation allowance.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
Company has unrecognized tax benefits of $5.6 million and
$5.6 million, respectively, relating to uncertain tax
positions.
The Companys operating subsidiaries in specific countries
may be subject to audit by various tax authorities and may have
different statutes of limitations expiration dates. With limited
exceptions, the Companys major subsidiaries that operate
in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia are no longer
subject to tax examinations for years before 2005, 2008 and
2005, respectively.
Because the Company operates in many jurisdictions, its net
earnings are subject to risk due to changing tax laws and tax
rates around the world. The current, rapidly changing economic
environment may increase the likelihood of substantial changes
to tax laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates. The
Company cannot predict what, if any, legislation, will actually
be proposed or enacted, or what the effect of any such
legislation might be on the Companys financial condition
and results of operations.
25
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On April 20, 2011, the Company entered into an Investment
Agreement (the Investment Agreement) with GSCP VI
AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Offshore Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Parallel
AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Employee Navi, Ltd., and GSCP VI GmbH
Navi, L.P. (collectively, the Purchasers), each of
which is an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co. Under the
Investment Agreement, the Company agreed to issue and sell, and
the Purchasers agreed to purchase, at several different closings
described immediately below, securities representing 19.9% of
the Companys outstanding share capital pro forma for all
of the issuances, with the right to acquire an additional 2.0%
on a fully diluted basis pro forma for all the issuances through
the exercise of warrants as described below, although the
Purchasers voting interest in the Company purchased
pursuant to the Investment Agreement will be less than 4.9%. The
securities that the Purchasers have acquired or, subject to
certain conditions, will be acquiring at these closings can be
further summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
At the first closing, which occurred on April 20, 2011 (the
First Closing), 531,345 of the Companys voting
ordinary shares, par value $1.00 per share (Voting Common
Shares), and 749,869 of the Companys newly created
Series A convertible non-voting preference shares, par
value $1.00 per share (the Non-Voting Preferred
Shares), at a purchase price of $86.00 per share, or
approximately $110.2 million in the aggregate. Subject to
the receipt of shareholder approval of certain amendments to the
Companys bye-laws to, among other things, create three new
classes of non-voting ordinary shares (the Shareholder
Approval), the Non-Voting Preferred Shares will convert on
a
share-for-share
basis (subject to adjustment in certain circumstances) into
non-voting ordinary shares of the Company, par value $1.00 (the
Non-Voting Common Shares). At the First Closing, the
Company also issued to the Purchasers warrants to acquire
340,820 Non-Voting Preferred Shares or, subject to the receipt
of the Shareholder Approval, Non-Voting Common Shares for an
exercise price of $115.00 per share, subject to certain
adjustments (the Warrants). The Purchasers may, at
their election, satisfy the exercise price of the Warrants on a
cashless basis by surrender of shares otherwise issuable upon
exercise of the Warrants in accordance with a formula set forth
in the Warrants. The Warrants expire on the ten year anniversary
of the First Closing.
|
|
|
|
At the second closing (the Second Closing), which is
expected to occur after receipt of applicable regulatory
approvals and satisfaction of other closing conditions (but not
before December 23, 2011), 134,184 Voting Common Shares and
827,504 Non-Voting Preferred Shares (unless the Company receives
the Shareholder Approval, in which case the Purchasers will
purchase Non-Voting Common Shares instead of Non-Voting
Preferred Shares at the Second Closing), at a purchase price of
$86.00 per share, or approximately $82.7 million in the
aggregate.
|
|
|
|
Subject to approval by the Companys shareholders of the
issuance of securities in excess of limits imposed by the
listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market and satisfaction
of other closing conditions, at a third closing (the Third
Closing), 1,148,264 Non-Voting Preferred Shares (unless
the Company receives the Shareholder Approval, in which case the
Purchasers will purchase Non-Voting Common Shares instead of
Non-Voting Preferred Shares at the Third Closing), at a purchase
price of $86.00 per share, or approximately $98.7 million
in the aggregate. If the Third Closing occurs, it is expected to
occur simultaneously with the Second Closing.
|
The Purchasers may also elect, at their option, to receive
Non-Voting Preferred Shares or, if applicable, Non-Voting Common
Shares in lieu of Voting Common Shares that might otherwise be
issuable to them at any of the closings discussed above. Any
such non-voting shares would be convertible on a
share-for-share
basis, subject to certain adjustments, into Voting Common Shares
at the option of the Purchasers. The total investment expected
to be made by the Purchasers for the purchase of the Voting
Common Shares, the Non-Voting Common Shares, the Non-Voting
Preferred Shares and the Warrants is approximately
$291.6 million.
In addition, certain directors and officers of the Company and
other persons have entered into voting agreements (the
Voting Agreements) with the Company concurrently
with the signing of the Investment
26
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS (contd)
|
Agreement with respect to shares representing 34.3% of the
Companys outstanding voting power. Under the Voting
Agreements, each such shareholder has committed, among other
things, to vote all voting securities of the Company that such
shareholder holds and is entitled to vote in favor of the
matters required to be approved by the Companys
shareholders in connection with the Investment Agreement.
In connection with the First Closing, the Company appointed
Sumit Rajpal, a managing director of Goldman, Sachs & Co.,
to its board of directors, effective May 16, 2011.
Due to the growing insignificance of the Companys
consulting activities in relation to its core reinsurance
operations, the Company has reevaluated its segment reporting
and concluded that it has one reportable segment. Due to the
decreasing relative significance of consulting activities and
the associated revenues and earnings, the Company no longer
monitors the results of consulting activities separately for
evaluating business performance and for making resource
allocation decisions. Accordingly, effective January 1,
2011, the Company will no longer report separately the results
of its consulting activities. Prior to 2011, the Company
reported two segments: reinsurance and consulting.
27
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Enstar Group Limited
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet of Enstar Group Limited and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of March 31, 2011, and the related
condensed consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive
income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for
the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A
review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements
taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material
modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated
interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the consolidated balance sheet of Enstar Group Limited and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income,
changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended; and in our report dated March 4, 2011, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from
which it has been derived.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche
Hamilton, Bermuda
May 6, 2011
28
|
|
Item 2.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following is a discussion and analysis of our results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction
with the attached unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto and the audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Business
Overview
Enstar Group Limited, or Enstar, was formed in August 2001 under
the laws of Bermuda to acquire and manage insurance and
reinsurance companies in run-off and portfolios of insurance and
reinsurance business in run-off, and to provide management,
consulting and other services to the insurance and reinsurance
industry.
Since our formation, we have acquired 31 insurance and
reinsurance companies and 15 portfolios of insurance and
reinsurance business and are now administering those businesses
in run-off. Insurance and reinsurance companies and portfolios
of insurance and reinsurance business we acquire that are in
run-off no longer underwrite new policies. We derive our net
earnings from the ownership and management of these companies
and portfolios of business in run-off primarily by settling
insurance and reinsurance claims below the acquired value of
loss reserves and from returns on the portfolio of investments
retained to pay future claims. In addition, we provide
management and consultancy services, claims inspection services
and reinsurance collection services to our affiliates and
third-party clients for both fixed and success-based fees.
Recent
Transactions
Laguna
On March 25, 2011, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary,
Kenmare Holdings Ltd., or Kenmare, completed the acquisition of
Laguna Life Limited, formerly known as CitiLife Financial
Limited, or Laguna, from Citigroup Insurance Holding
Corporation, or Citigroup, an affiliate of Citigroup Inc. Laguna
is an Ireland-based life insurer that is in run-off. The
purchase price was 15.0 million (approximately
$21.2 million) and was funded from available cash on hand.
The previously disclosed purchase price of 30.0 million
(approximately $42.4 million) was reduced, prior to completion
of the acquisition, after Citigroup received approval from
Lagunas regulator to distribute 15.0 million
(approximately $21.2 million) to its shareholders.
Clarendon
On December 22, 2010, we, through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Clarendon Holdings, Inc., entered into a definitive
agreement for the purchase of Clarendon National Insurance
Company, or Clarendon, from Clarendon Insurance Group, Inc., an
affiliate of Hannover Re. Clarendon is a New Jersey-domiciled
insurer that is in run-off. The purchase price is approximately
$200 million and will be financed in part by a bank loan
facility provided by a London-based bank entered into on
March 4, 2011 and in part from available cash on hand.
Completion of the transaction is conditioned on, among other
things, regulatory approval and satisfaction of various
customary closing conditions. The transaction is expected to
close in the second quarter of 2011.
Significant
New Business
Shelbourne
RITC Transactions
In December 2007, we, in conjunction with JCF FPK I L.P., or JCF
FPK, and a newly-hired executive management team, formed
U.K.-based Shelbourne Group Limited, or Shelbourne, to invest in
Reinsurance to Close or RITC transactions (the
transferring of liabilities from one Lloyds syndicate to
another) with Lloyds of London insurance and reinsurance
syndicates in run-off. We own approximately 56.8% of Shelbourne,
which in turn owns 100% of Shelbourne Syndicate Services
Limited, the Managing Agency for Lloyds Syndicate 2008, a
syndicate approved by Lloyds of London on
December 16, 2007 to undertake RITC transactions with
Lloyds syndicates in run-off.
29
JCF FPK is a joint investment program between Fox-Pitt, Kelton,
Cochran, Caronia & Waller (USA) LLC, or FPK, and J.C.
Flowers II, L.P., or the Flowers Fund. The Flowers Fund is a
private investment fund advised by J.C. Flowers & Co.
LLC. J. Christopher Flowers, one of our largest shareholders and
formerly a member of our board of directors, is the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of J.C. Flowers & Co. LLC. In
addition, an affiliate of the Flowers Fund controlled
approximately 41% of FPK until its sale of FPK in December 2009.
In February 2011, Lloyds Syndicate 2008 entered into RITC
agreements with two Lloyds syndicates with total gross
insurance reserves of approximately $129.6 million. The
capital commitment to Lloyds Syndicate 2008 with respect
to these two RITC agreements amounted to £21.3 million
(approximately $34.1 million), which was fully funded from
our available cash on hand.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated
statement of operations data for each of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting fees
|
|
$
|
4,036
|
|
|
$
|
14,128
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
18,542
|
|
|
|
26,121
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
Gain on bargain purchase
|
|
|
13,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,051
|
|
|
|
42,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses
|
|
|
(2,612
|
)
|
|
|
(1,942
|
)
|
Reduction in provisions for bad debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,339
|
)
|
Reduction in provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
(11,537
|
)
|
|
|
(8,965
|
)
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
10,077
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,072
|
)
|
|
|
(9,596
|
)
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
10,382
|
|
|
|
15,190
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
17,750
|
|
|
|
10,487
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
Net foreign exchange loss
|
|
|
7,334
|
|
|
|
7,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,360
|
|
|
|
26,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes and share of net earnings of partly
owned company
|
|
|
5,691
|
|
|
|
16,388
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
(5,922
|
)
|
Share of net earnings of partly owned company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
|
17,616
|
|
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
(1,695
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED
|
|
$
|
3,503
|
|
|
$
|
15,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Comparison
of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and
2010
We reported consolidated net earnings, before net earnings
attributable to noncontrolling interest, of approximately $5.1
million and $17.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in
earnings of approximately $12.5 million was primarily
attributable to the following:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
a decrease in consulting fees of $10.1 million mainly related to
lower fees earned from incentive based engagements;
|
|
|
(ii)
|
lower net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities of $5.5 million;
|
|
|
(iii)
|
an increase in general and administrative expenses of
$7.3 million due predominantly to an increase in
professional fees relating largely to audit and third-party
management fees as a result of 2010 acquisition activity;
|
|
|
(iv)
|
a decrease in net investment income of $7.6 million
primarily as a result of lower unrealized gains in our private
equity portfolio, classified as other investments, from
$7.7 million in 2010 to $0.9 million in 2011; and
|
|
|
(v)
|
a decrease in our share of net earnings of partly owned company
from $7.2 million in 2010 to $nil in 2011 as a result of
our disposition of our investment in the partly owned company
during 2010; partially offset by
|
|
|
(vi)
|
the gain on bargain purchase of $13.1 million in 2011,
which arose in relation to our acquisition of Laguna;
|
|
|
(vii)
|
a decrease in income tax expense of $5.3 million due in
large part to lower net earnings within our taxable
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
(viii)
|
a decrease in salary and benefit costs of $4.8 million due
primarily to the release back to earnings of the unallocated
portion of the 2010 year end bonus accrual provision.
|
We recorded noncontrolling interest in earnings of
$1.6 million and $1.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net earnings
attributable to Enstar Group Limited decreased from
$15.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010 to $3.5 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011.
We no longer report our results of operations by segments. We
previously reported our results of operations under the
consulting and reinsurance business segments, but we believe the
consulting business no longer meets the criteria of an operating
segment, as more fully described in Note 15 to our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consulting
Fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,036
|
|
|
$
|
14,128
|
|
|
$
|
(10,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We earned consulting fees of approximately $4.0 million and
$14.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in consulting fees
primarily related to the decrease in incentive fees earned from
third-party agreements. Consulting fee income as a percentage of
net earnings has declined in recent periods, and we would expect
it to remain at or around current levels in future periods,
excluding the impact of any one time incentive based fees that
we might receive. While we intend to continue to provide
management and consultancy services, claims inspection services
and reinsurance collection services to third-party clients in
limited circumstances, our core focus continues to be acquiring
and managing insurance and reinsurance companies and portfolios
of business in run-off.
31
Net
Investment Income and Net Realized and Unrealized
Gains:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Variance
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,542
|
|
|
$
|
26,121
|
|
|
$
|
(7,579
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,368
|
|
|
$
|
2,202
|
|
|
$
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income for the three months ended March 31,
2011 decreased by $7.6 million to $18.5 million, as
compared to $26.1 million for the same period in 2010. The
decrease was attributable largely to lower unrealized gains in
our private equity portfolio, classified as other investments,
from $7.7 million in 2010 to $0.9 million in 2011.
The average return on the cash and fixed maturities for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 was 1.87%, as compared to
the average return of 2.18% for the three months ended
March 31, 2010. The average credit rating of our fixed
maturity investments at March 31, 2011 was AA-.
Net realized and unrealized gains for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $3.4 million and
$2.2 million, respectively. The net realized and unrealized
gains relate predominantly to
mark-to-market
changes in the market value of our equity investments.
Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with the provisions of the Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures topic of the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Codification, we have categorized our investments
that are recorded at fair value among levels as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identified Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,014
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,014
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,390
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,443,650
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
1,444,201
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,757
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,777
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
48,739
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,256
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
59,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
63,655
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,916
|
|
|
|
139,962
|
|
|
|
233,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
59,680
|
|
|
$
|
2,438,327
|
|
|
$
|
145,450
|
|
|
$
|
2,643,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on
Bargain Purchase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,105
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on bargain purchase of $13.1 million and $nil, was
recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively. The gain on bargain purchase was earned in
connection with our acquisition of Laguna and represents the
excess of the cumulative fair value of net assets acquired of
$34.3 million over the cost of $21.2 million. This
excess has, in accordance with the provisions of the Business
Combinations topic of the FASB Codification, been recognized as
income for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The gain
on bargain purchase
32
arose mainly as a result of our reassessment, upon acquisition,
of the total required estimated costs to manage the business to
expiry. Our assessment of costs was lower than the acquired
costs recorded by the vendor in the financial statements of
Laguna.
Net
Reduction in Ultimate Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense
Liabilities:
The following table shows the components of the movement in the
net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Net losses paid
|
|
$
|
(88,131
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83,225
|
)
|
Net change in case and LAE reserves
|
|
|
83,430
|
|
|
|
78,854
|
|
Net change in IBNR
|
|
|
7,313
|
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
Reduction in provisions for bad debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,339
|
|
Reduction in provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
11,537
|
|
|
|
8,965
|
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(10,077
|
)
|
|
|
(6,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,072
|
|
|
$
|
9,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in case and loss adjustment expense reserves, or
LAE reserves, comprises the movement during the quarter in
specific case reserve liabilities as a result of claims
settlements or changes advised to us by our policyholders and
attorneys, less changes in case reserves recoverable advised by
us to our reinsurers as a result of the settlement or movement
of assumed claims. Net reduction in incurred but not reported,
or IBNR, represents the change in our actuarial estimates of
losses incurred but not reported.
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of
$4.1 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $2.6 million and a reduction in
provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense liabilities
of $11.5 million, relating to 2011 run-off activity,
partially offset by the amortization, over the estimated payout
period, of fair value adjustments relating to companies acquired
amounting to $10.1 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$2.6 million comprised net incurred loss development of
$4.7 million and reductions in IBNR reserves of
$7.3 million.
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of
$9.6 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $1.9 million, a reduction in
aggregate provisions for bad debt of $5.3 million and a
reduction in provisions for unallocated loss and loss adjustment
expense liabilities of $9.0 million, relating to 2010
run-off activity, partially offset by the amortization, over the
estimated payout period, of fair value adjustments relating to
companies acquired amounting to $6.7 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$1.9 million comprised net incurred loss development of
$4.4 million and reductions in IBNR reserves of
$6.3 million. The reductions in aggregate provisions for
bad debt of $5.3 million resulted from the collection of
receivables against which bad debt provisions had been provided
in earlier periods.
The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and
ending reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. Losses incurred
and paid are reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1
|
|
$
|
3,291,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,479,136
|
|
Less: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
525,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,765,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,131,408
|
|
Effect of exchange rate movement
|
|
|
34,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,975
|
)
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
(4,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,596
|
)
|
Net losses paid
|
|
|
(88,131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,225
|
)
|
Acquired on purchase of subsidiaries
|
|
|
10,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,042
|
|
Retroactive reinsurance contracts assumed
|
|
|
93,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance as at March 31
|
|
$
|
2,811,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,455,043
|
|
Plus: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
583,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31
|
|
$
|
3,394,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,890,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and Benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,382
|
|
|
$
|
15,190
|
|
|
$
|
4,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits, which include expenses relating to our
discretionary bonus and employee share plans, were
$10.4 million and $15.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The decrease in salaries and benefits was attributable to:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
the reduction in the discretionary bonus accrual of
$6.3 million due to the release back to earnings in 2011 of
approximately $4.0 million relating to the unallocated
portion of the 2010 year end bonus accrual provision and
the reduction in net earnings for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 as compared to 2010; partially offset by
|
|
|
(ii)
|
increased staff costs due to an increase in the average staff
numbers from 296 for the three months ended March 31, 2010
to 339 for the three months ended March 31, 2011; and
|
|
|
(iii)
|
an increase from $0.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 to $0.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 in relation to the amortization of the
unrecognized compensation costs in respect of the restricted
shares that were awarded under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan to
an executive officer in 2011 and certain employees in 2010.
|
Expenses relating to our discretionary bonus plan will be
variable and are dependent on our overall profitability.
General
and Administrative Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,750
|
|
|
$
|
10,487
|
|
|
$
|
(7,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses increased by
$7.3 million during the three months ended March 31,
2011, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The increase was due principally to: (i) increased legal
fees of approximately $1.1 million due to ongoing due
diligence and financing activities; (ii) increased audit
and audit
34
related fees of $0.6 million due to our overall growth;
(iii) increased third-party management fees paid of
$1.2 million due primarily to transition fees paid in
respect of a recently completed acquisition, along with other
contractor fees; (iv) increased other professional and
consulting fees of $1.1 million; (v) increased rent
and rent related expenses of $0.7 million due largely to a
rent recovery reflected in 2010; (vi) increased
irrecoverable value added tax and disallowed federal excise
taxes paid of $0.9 million; and (vii) increased bank
and letter of credit charges of $0.7 million.
Interest
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,966
|
|
|
$
|
2,394
|
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense of $2.0 million and $2.4 million was
recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively. The decrease in interest expense was
attributable predominantly to the reduction in principal levels
on loans outstanding and an overall lower interest rate on loan
amounts outstanding during the three months ended March 31,
2011.
Net Foreign Exchange Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,334
|
|
|
$
|
7,588
|
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded a net foreign exchange loss of $7.3 million and
$7.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The net foreign exchange loss arose
primarily as a result of: (i) holding surplus British pound
liabilities at a time when the British pound was appreciating
against the U.S. dollar; (ii) the currency mismatch
that is created by holding foreign currency
available-for-sale
security assets whereby any net foreign currency translation
gains or losses on those assets are reflected in the balance
sheet as part of accumulated other comprehensive income, but the
net foreign currency gains or losses on the corresponding
liabilities impact the statement of earnings; (iii) net
foreign exchange losses arising as a result of holding surplus
U.S. dollar assets in one of our subsidiaries whose
functional currency is Australian dollars at a time when the
U.S. dollar was depreciating against the
Australian dollar; and (iv) a decrease in the fair
value of our Australian dollar foreign currency forward exchange
contract, which was recognized as part of net foreign exchange
loss.
Income
Tax Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
|
$
|
5,922
|
|
|
$
|
5,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded income tax expense of $0.6 million and
$5.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The decrease in taxes for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 was due predominantly to lower
earnings as a result of lower incentive fees earned from
third-party agreements as compared to those earned in the same
period for 2010, along with reduced tax expense attributable to
lower overall net earnings in our tax paying subsidiaries.
Share of
Net Earnings of Partly Owned Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,150
|
|
|
$
|
(7,150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded $nil
as our share of net earnings of partly owned company as compared
to $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010. The decrease was attributable to the fact that we no
longer have an investment in a partly owned company; during
2010, we disposed of our 44.4% indirect interest in Stonewall
Insurance Company and we acquired a 100% interest in Seaton
Insurance Company.
Noncontrolling
Interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,571
|
|
|
$
|
1,695
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded a noncontrolling interest in earnings of
$1.6 million and $1.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 in noncontrolling
interest was due primarily to a decrease in earnings for those
companies where there exists a noncontrolling interest.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Long-term
Debt
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were
several developments regarding the two facilities under the term
facilities agreement we entered into in connection with our
acquisition of Unionamerica Holdings Limited in December 2008.
In January 2011, the accrued interest outstanding of
$0.2 million relating to Unionamerica Facility B was
settled. In addition, on March 3, 2011, we repaid
$40.5 million of the outstanding loan balance of
Unionamerica Facility A. As of March 31, 2011, the
remaining outstanding loan balance of Unionamerica Facility A,
inclusive of accrued interest, was $30.2 million.
On March 4, 2011, we, through Clarendon Holdings, Inc.,
entered into a $106.5 million term facility agreement, or
the Clarendon Facility, with a London-based bank. The Clarendon
Facility provides for a four-year term loan facility, which will
be available to fund up to 50% of the purchase price of our
acquisition of Clarendon, described above. As of March 31,
2011, Clarendon Holdings, Inc. has not borrowed any of the
amount available under the Clarendon Facility. The Clarendon
Facility will be secured by a security interest in all of the
assets of Clarendon Holdings, Inc., as well as a first priority
lien on the stock of both Clarendon Holdings, Inc. and
Clarendon. Interest is payable at the end of each interest
period chosen by Clarendon Holdings, Inc. or, at the latest,
each six months. The interest rate is LIBOR plus 2.75%. The
Clarendon Facility is subject to various financial and business
covenants, including limitations on mergers and consolidations,
restrictions as to disposition of stock and limitations on liens
on the stock.
As of March 31, 2011, all of the covenants relating to our
outstanding credit facilities were met.
Private
Placement
On April 20, 2011, we entered into an Investment Agreement
(or the Investment Agreement) with GSCP VI AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP
VI Offshore Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Parallel AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI
Employee Navi, Ltd., and GSCP VI GmbH Navi, L.P. (or,
collectively, the Purchasers), each of which is an affiliate of
Goldman, Sachs & Co. Under the Investment Agreement,
we agreed to issue and sell, and the Purchasers agreed to
purchase, at several different closings described below,
securities representing 19.9% of our outstanding share capital
pro forma for all of the issuances, with the right to acquire an
additional 2.0% on a fully diluted basis pro forma for all the
issuances through the exercise of warrants as described below,
although the Purchasers voting interest in us purchased
pursuant to the Investment Agreement will be less than 4.9%. The
Investment Agreement and the securities that the Purchasers have
acquired, or subject to certain conditions, will be acquiring at
each of the closings are further summarized above in
Note 14 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In connection with the first closing under the Investment
Agreement, which occurred on April 20, 2011, we issued to
the Purchasers 531,345 of our voting ordinary shares, par value
$1.00 per share (or the Voting Common Shares), and 749,869 of
our Series A convertible non-voting preference shares, par
value $1.00 per share (or the
36
Non-Voting Preferred Shares), at a purchase price of $86.00 per
share, and warrants to acquire 340,820 Non-Voting Preferred
Shares or, subject to the receipt of shareholder approval of
certain amendments to our bye-laws to, among other things,
create three new classes of non-voting ordinary shares (or the
Shareholder Approval), Non-Voting Common Shares for an exercise
price of $115.00 per share, for aggregate proceeds of
approximately $110.2 million.
In connection with the second closing under the Investment
Agreement, which is expected to occur after receipt of
applicable regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other
closing conditions (but not before December 23, 2011), we
would issue to the Purchasers 134,184 Voting Common Shares and
827,504 Non-Voting Preferred Shares (unless we receive the
Shareholder Approval, in which case we would issue Non-Voting
Common Shares instead of Non-Voting Preferred Shares), at a
purchase price of $86.00 per share, for aggregate proceeds of
approximately $82.7 million.
In connection with the third closing under the Investment
Agreement, which is subject to approval by our shareholders of
the issuances of securities in excess of limits imposed by the
listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market and satisfaction
of other closing conditions, we would issue to the Purchasers
1,148,264 Non-Voting Preferred Shares (unless we receive the
Shareholder Approval, in which case we would issue Non-Voting
Common Shares instead of Non-Voting Preferred Shares), at a
purchase price of $86.00 per share, for aggregate proceeds of
approximately $98.7 million. If the third closing occurs,
it is expected to occur simultaneously with the second closing.
The proceeds received and to be received in connection with the
closings under the Investment Agreement will provide us with
capital and financial flexibility to pursue desirable
acquisitions of insurance and reinsurance companies in run-off
and portfolios of insurance and reinsurance business in run-off.
In connection with the first closing under the Investment
Agreement, we appointed Sumit Rajpal, a managing director of
Goldman, Sachs & Co., to our board of directors, effective
May 16, 2011.
Other than the above, there have been no material changes to our
liquidity position or capital resource requirements since
December 31, 2010. For more information refer to
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources included in Item 7 of our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Cash
Flows
With respect to the three month periods ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, net cash used in our operating activities was
$290.4 million and $142.9 million, respectively. The
increase in cash used was attributable primarily to:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
an increase in the net amount of purchases, sales and maturities
of trading securities of $184.8 million. This increase
reflects the decision of our investment committee to increase
the allocation of our investment portfolio to trading
securities; and
|
|
|
(ii)
|
a decrease in the net changes in assets and liabilities of
$44.1 million.
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities for the
three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was
$184.4 million and $(75.2) million, respectively. The
increase in cash flows was attributable primarily to:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
an increase of $101.1 million in the sales and maturities of
available-for-sale securities due to the decision of our
investment committee to increase the allocation of our
investment portfolio to trading securities;
|
|
|
(ii)
|
a decrease in the net amount of purchases and maturities of
held-to-maturity securities of $214.9 million due to the
decision of our investment committee, discussed above, to
increase the allocation of our investment portfolio to trading
securities; and
|
|
|
(iii)
|
a decrease of $85.4 million of restricted cash and cash
equivalents arising as a result of the purchase of restricted
investments classified as trading securities.
|
37
Net cash used in financing activities for the three month
periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was
$56.7 million and $6.0 million, respectively. The
increase of $50.7 million in cash used in financing
activities was attributable primarily to the following:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
an increase of $40.5 million in the repayment of
outstanding bank loans; and
|
|
|
(ii)
|
an increase of $16.2 million in distribution of capital
paid to noncontrolling interest in 2011; partially offset by
|
|
|
(iii)
|
a decrease of $6.0 million in dividends paid to
noncontrolling interest.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
In February 2011, Lloyds Syndicate 2008 entered into RITC
agreements with two Lloyds syndicates with total gross
insurance reserves of approximately $129.6 million. Our
capital commitment to Lloyds Syndicate 2008 with respect
to these two RITC agreements amounted to £21.3 million
(approximately $34.1 million).
There have been no other material changes in our commitments or
contingencies since December 31, 2010. Refer to Item 7
included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Our critical accounting estimates are discussed in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition contained in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Off-Balance
Sheet and Special Purpose Entity Arrangements
At March 31, 2011, we did not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements, as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of
Regulation S-K.
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report contains statements that constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, with respect to our financial
condition, results of operations, business strategies, operating
efficiencies, competitive positions, growth opportunities, plans
and objectives of our management, as well as the markets for our
ordinary shares and the insurance and reinsurance sectors in
general. Statements that include words such as
estimate, project, plan,
intend, expect, anticipate,
believe, would, should,
could, seek, and similar statements of a
future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking
statements for purposes of the federal securities laws or
otherwise. All forward-looking statements are necessarily
estimates or expectations, and not statements of historical
fact, reflecting the best judgment of our management and involve
a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those suggested by the
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
should, therefore, be considered in light of various important
factors, including those set forth in this quarterly report.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those suggested by the forward-looking statements include:
|
|
|
|
|
risks associated with implementing our business strategies and
initiatives;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our loss reserves and the need to adjust such
reserves as claims develop over time;
|
|
|
|
risks relating to the availability and collectability of our
reinsurance;
|
|
|
|
risks that we may require additional capital in the future which
may not be available or may be available only on unfavorable
terms;
|
|
|
|
changes and uncertainty in economic conditions, including
interest rates, inflation, currency exchange rates, equity
markets and credit conditions, which could affect our investment
portfolio, our ability to finance future acquisitions and our
profitability;
|
|
|
|
operational risks as a result of our past and future
acquisitions, such as cash flow shortages, personnel recruitment
challenges, additional integration costs and excessive
management time and effort;
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
losses due to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
tax, regulatory or legal restrictions or limitations applicable
to us or the insurance and reinsurance business generally;
|
|
|
|
increased competitive pressures, including the consolidation and
increased globalization of reinsurance providers;
|
|
|
|
emerging claim and coverage issues;
|
|
|
|
lengthy and unpredictable litigation affecting assessment of
losses
and/or
coverage issues;
|
|
|
|
loss of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
changes in our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations or
intentions, which may happen at any time at managements
discretion;
|
|
|
|
operational risks, including system or human failures;
|
|
|
|
the risk that ongoing or future industry regulatory developments
will disrupt our business, or mandate changes in industry
practices in ways that increase our costs, decrease our revenues
or require us to alter aspects of the way we do business;
|
|
|
|
changes in Bermuda law or regulation or the political stability
of Bermuda;
|
|
|
|
changes in tax laws or regulations applicable to us or our
subsidiaries, or the risk that we or one of our
non-U.S. subsidiaries
become subject to significant, or significantly increased,
income taxes in the United States or elsewhere; and
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies or practices.
|
The factors listed above should be not construed as
exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other
cautionary statements and Risk Factors that are included in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, as well as in the
other materials filed and to be filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update or review any forward looking
statement, whether as a result of new information, future
developments or otherwise.
|
|
Item 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
There have been no material changes in our market risk exposures
since December 31, 2010. For more information refer to
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk included in Item 7A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
Item 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management performed an evaluation, with the participation
of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2011. Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to ensure that information that we are required to
disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission and is accumulated and
communicated to management, including our principal executive
and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Controls
Our management has performed an evaluation, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, of changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended
March 31, 2011. Based upon that evaluation there were no
changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2011 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
39
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings
in the ordinary course of business, including litigation
regarding claims. We do not believe that the resolution of any
currently pending legal proceedings, either individually or
taken as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations or financial condition.
Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that lawsuits, arbitrations
or other litigation will not have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition or results of operations. We
anticipate that, similar to the rest of the insurance and
reinsurance industry, we will continue to be subject to
litigation and arbitration proceedings in the ordinary course of
business, including litigation generally related to the scope of
coverage with respect to asbestos and environmental claims.
There can be no assurance that any such future litigation will
not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
Our results of operations and financial condition are subject to
numerous risks and uncertainties described in Risk
Factors included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010. The risk factors
identified therein have not materially changed.
|
|
Item 5.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
On May 6, 2011, J. Christopher Flowers resigned from our
board of directors. Mr. Flowers departure from our
board of directors was not due to any disagreement, including
any disagreement relating to our operations, policies or
practices.
40
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Term Facility Agreement dated March 4, 2011 between Clarendon
Holdings, Inc. and National Bank Limited.
|
|
10
|
.2+
|
|
Enstar Group Limited 2011-2015 Annual Incentive Compensation
Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2011).
|
|
10
|
.3*+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Dominic F. Silvester, amending Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Enstar Group
Limited and Dominic F. Silvester.
|
|
10
|
.4*+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Paul J. OShea, amending
Employment Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and
Paul J. OShea.
|
|
10
|
.5*+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Nicholas A. Packer, amending Employment
Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and Nicholas A.
Packer.
|
|
10
|
.6*+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Richard J. Harris, amending Employment
Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and Richard J.
Harris.
|
|
15
|
.1*
|
|
Deloitte & Touche Letter Regarding Unaudited Interim
Financial Information.
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1**
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32
|
.2**
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
+ |
|
Denotes management contract or compensatory arrangement |
41
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on
May 6, 2011.
ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Richard
J. Harris
|
Richard J. Harris,
Chief Financial Officer, Authorized Signatory and
Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
42
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Term Facility Agreement dated March 4, 2011 between
Clarendon Holdings, Inc. and National Bank Limited.
|
|
10
|
.2+
|
|
Enstar Group Limited 2011-2015 Annual Incentive Compensation
Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2011).
|
|
10
|
.3*+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Dominic F. Silvester, amending Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Enstar Group
Limited and Dominic F. Silvester.
|
|
10
|
.4*+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Paul J. OShea, amending
Employment Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and
Paul J. OShea.
|
|
10
|
.5*+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Nicholas A. Packer, amending Employment
Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and Nicholas A.
Packer.
|
|
10
|
.6*+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Richard J. Harris, amending Employment
Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and Richard J.
Harris.
|
|
15
|
.1*
|
|
Deloitte & Touche Letter Regarding Unaudited Interim
Financial Information.
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Certification pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Certification pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1**
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2**
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
+ |
|
Denotes management contract or compensatory arrangement |
43