dfan14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant o
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant þ
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
þ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §. 240.14a-12
TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required |
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) (4) and 0-11. |
|
1. |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by
registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date
of its filing. |
|
1. |
|
Amount previously paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements made in this communication that are not statements of historical fact, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations, including any benefits of the proposed acquisition
of Tenet Healthcare Corporation (Tenet), are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
federal securities laws and should be evaluated as such. Forward-looking statements include
statements that may relate to our plans, objectives, strategies, goals, future events, future
revenues or performance, and other information that is not historical information. These
forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as anticipate, expect, suggest,
plan, believe, intend, estimate, target, project, could, should, may, will,
would, continue, forecast, and other similar expressions.
These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and you should be aware that many
factors could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements. Factors that may materially affect such forward-looking statements
include: our ability to successfully complete any proposed transaction or realize the anticipated
benefits of a transaction, our ability to obtain stockholder, antitrust, regulatory and other
approvals for any proposed transaction, or an inability to obtain them on the terms proposed or on
the anticipated schedule, uncertainty of our expected financial performance following completion of
any proposed transaction and other risks and uncertainties referenced in our filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Forward-looking statements, like all statements in
this communication, speak only as of the date of this communication (unless another date is
indicated). We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Additional Information
This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any
securities. This communication relates to a business combination transaction with Tenet
proposed by Community Health Systems, Inc. (CHS), which may become the subject of a registration
statement filed with the SEC. CHS intends to file a proxy statement with the SEC in connection with
Tenets 2011 annual meeting of shareholders. Any definitive proxy statement will be mailed to
shareholders of Tenet. This material is not a substitute for any prospectus, proxy statement or any
other document which CHS may file with the SEC in connection with the proposed transaction.
INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ ANY SUCH DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY IN
THEIR ENTIRETY IF AND WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION
ABOUT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION. Such documents would be available free of charge through the web
site maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov or by directing a request to Community Health
Systems, Inc. at 4000 Meridian Boulevard, Franklin, TN 37067, Attn: Investor Relations.
Participant Information
CHS and its directors, executive officers and nominees may be deemed to be participants in the
solicitation of proxies in connection with Tenets 2011 annual meeting of shareholders. The
directors of CHS are: Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash, John A. Clerico, James S. Ely III, John A.
Fry, William N. Jennings, M.D., Julia B. North and H. Mitchell Watson, Jr. The executive officers
of CHS are: Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash, David L. Miller, William S. Hussey, Michael T. Portacci,
Martin D. Smith, Thomas D. Miller, Rachel A. Seifert and T. Mark Buford. The nominees of CHS are:
Thomas M. Boudreau, Duke K. Bristow, Ph.D., John E. Hornbeak, Curtis S. Lane, Douglas E. Linton,
Peter H. Rothschild, John A. Sedor, Steven J. Shulman, Daniel S. Van Riper, David J. Wenstrup,
James O. Egan, Jon Rotenstreich, Gary M. Stein and Larry D. Yost. CHS and its subsidiaries
beneficially owned approximately 420,000 shares of Tenet common stock as of January 7, 2011.
Additional information regarding CHSs directors and executive officers is available in its proxy
statement for CHSs 2011 annual meeting of stockholders, which was filed with the SEC on April 7,
2011. Other information regarding potential participants in such proxy solicitation and a
description of their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, will be
contained in the proxy statement that CHS intends to file with the SEC in connection with Tenets
2011 annual meeting of shareholders.
On May
2, 2011, W. Larry Cash, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Community Health Systems, Inc. (CHS), presented at the Deutsche Bank Annual Healthcare Conference. Some of his remarks included
a discussion of CHSs proposed acquisition of Tenet Healthcare Corporation (Tenet) and the expected proxy solicitation in
connection with Tenets 2011 annual meeting of shareholders.
Below are excerpts from the transcript of the presentation
relating to Tenet.
*****
CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS
Larry Cash
Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
CONFERENCE CALL PARTICIPANTS
Darren Lehrich
Deutsche Bank Analyst
PRESENTATION
*****
Larry Cash - Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
*****
Turning to the Tenet transaction, just to repeat some of the slides we had before, it is a very
good fit. 10 or 11 states are existing states. We can put our operating efficiencies and best
practice, managed care negotiations. We have been very successful in physician recruitment.
We have had success in integrating acquisitions. And the transaction is actually smaller than Triad
on a relative basis, and it should be accretive the first year.
We made the offer subsequent events here recently. There was a lawsuit they filed against us. We
responded to that on April 28. We made an all-cash offer of $6, and that was rejected April 22.
This morning, we put out an offer of $7.25 and gave them until Monday to respond and look for a
prompt response about that. [And if theres] not a meaningful engagement of activity during that
timeframe, we will move forward and remove our offer in support of the directors.
Just to size the company, we hope the transaction is received positively by the Board. We think it
is a compelling offer. It is 69% above the first offer of the price before the offer was made. And
it is a 20% premium there. And it is above the current trading price of their stock, still from
Friday and today.
$22 billion of revenue. It will be 180 hospitals, almost 33,000 beds. And again, 10 of the 29
states are similar states, only Nebraska. You will see Triad was 56%. Tenet would be 42%. EBITDA
55%, 36%, and so forth.
We improved the margin about 280 basis points. First full calendar-year synergy is $145 million to
over $275 million, which did not include any revenue-generated items other than managed care
negotiations. And we recruited 2400 physicians, and we felt there are some high
*****
We made the we think a compelling offer for Tenet and given them a week to respond to the 20% increase in the price, and, again, 69% over the price before this all got started.
*****
QUESTION AND ANSWER
Darren Lehrich - Deutsche Bank Analyst
*****
Can you define good faith? How are you looking at Tenets next move in relation to your definition?
And what would represent meaningful engagement on your part or on their part to basically prevent
this deadline from passing?
Larry Cash - Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
The first letter offered back in December 45 days to do due diligence and work on the
agreement. I just think if that could be planned and started, it would have that kind of activity.
We are operating off the data available to us. If there is other data available to us, we will
review that as part of the components of our due diligence if any such information [agrees].
I think if
they want to start a dialogue, we are open to do that, and wed always hope to have some
form of due diligence to confirm what we thought would be a good transaction for us and their
shareholders. So it would be predominantly hearing from them they would like to do that type of a
due diligence.
Darren Lehrich - Deutsche Bank Analyst
So, any type of meeting or a movement to a meeting between your advisors and their advisors
would fall in that definition?
Larry Cash - Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
I think that would be a definition of good faith, yes.
*****
Unidentified Audience Member
Just wondering if you are making any operational changes to counteract any behavioral changes
on the part of your medical staff as they respond to all the investigations from the government.
Larry Cash - Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
The only operational change that weve made, we decided about, say, seven or eight weeks ago
to install InterQual. We believe that the InterQual is fairly close to our current Blue Book
criteria, which we discussed last Thursday a great deal.
We are still recruiting for our physicians. We do have, of course, we have once a year medical
staff chief of staff meetings, which well have in a few months. And we have been in constant
communication with our CEOs and dont expect rapid changes need to be done. We have been in
constant communication with them and the management and operations to make sure we continue to
operate the Company and continue to move the Company going forward.
I just would add, theres a lot of discussions, and what we had often said, Wayne, who is in front
of our physician advisor groups and ER management groups and hospice groups and Chief of Staff
groups, as our Presidents are, no one has ever commented on anything similar to the allegations
which Tenet accused us on April 11.
Darren Lehrich - Deutsche Bank Analyst
A question for you, Larry. What happens if this deal dies? And what is the next step for
Community in terms of using the balance sheet? Youre obviously willing to use the balance sheet
with Tenet. You have done buybacks in the past. How should we be thinking about what Community
could do if this particular deal went away?
Larry Cash - Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
Lets dont be quite so negative yet. But if the deal were not there, what we would do is
continue to focus, as we have done. I think we said last December and January we will continue to
look for not-for-profit hospitals. Weve got a pretty reasonably active pipeline of both physician
transactions and hospital transactions, which we think will help grow the Company.
I think the indication in Scranton shows that during all this, we did close that transaction. We
will have other transactions similars to that that we will do.
Weve got the opportunity of the four hospitals bought last year, plus this hospital, to improve
the margin and continue to do what we have done, is move the margin up of acquired hospitals and
add more acquired hospitals to it.
From a balance sheet perspective, we dont have any call on our debt until 2014, which is about
three years away. We did do an [imminent spend] of $1.5 billion in November. Wed consider doing
something like that to structure the balance sheet. And we do have a call option, which [well]
evaluate that at the time, for our bonds coming up in July.
Darren Lehrich - Deutsche Bank Analyst
Larry, what is the significance of $7.25? Many Tenet shareholders would argue that you
certainly could pay more than that, and maybe it is worth more than that. So maybe just walk us
through your thought process around the $7.25 level.
Larry Cash - Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
That is the price that we and our advisors, based on our due diligence and our models and
looking at it and what we thought was being sure you had an accretive transaction.
Darren Lehrich - Deutsche Bank Analyst
And how does leverage play into that thought, Larry?
Larry Cash - Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
The leverage we are very adequately financed right now. We are capable of handling this
transaction at the $7.25 with what we believe our debt and covenants will be at the time.
Unidentified Audience Member
Was wondering if your financial advisors are willing to provide something more than a highly
confident letter in support of your transaction.
Larry Cash - Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
I think the first step is due diligence.
Unidentified Audience Member
Are you willing to (multiple speakers)
Larry Cash - Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
They are not willing to indicate any willingness or they havent said one way or the other.
We really think due diligence will be the next step. I dont think financing should be a limiting
factor here. And we have also offered our financial advisors to talk to any of the Tenet advisors.
I believe that was in the press release.
Darren Lehrich - Deutsche Bank Analyst
Just a question about the rebuttal presentation you made last week. I think one of the more
striking elements was the change in admission pre- and post- the Triad integration worked out to be
something like 2500 admissions if you apply the math to the national averages on one-day stays, as
you said in your analysis.
How does that square relative to what Tenet has alleged? And if you could maybe just talk about it
on an aggregate basis and then maybe more on an individual hospital basis to help the audience
think about that allegation.
Larry Cash - Community Health Systems, Inc. CFO
Well, the observation rate appeared to be a contrived statistic. And I notice they also left
off another competitor here with a similar observation rate. We do not believe an observation rate
defined as observation visits divided by observation visits plus all your admissions is a relevant
statistic. And we tend to show that.
I think if you work through the math, what we attempted to do was show that they had alleged 20,000
to 31,000 inappropriate admissions. You assume a reasonable percentage of that based on history
would be one-day stays. It is something like a 40% to 60% of our 38,000 one-day stays would be
inappropriate, which seems absurd.
And also, we have tried to restate what our one-day-stay admission percentage would be if you did
believe their 20,000 to 31,000, [when] suggested for a reasonable estimate what would be one-day
stays. We would have an average of something like 4% to 8%, the national average of 12%. So we just
thought that the logic was flawed in the way they did that.
I think the 2500 youre alluding to was the increase in the Triad hospitals counter 07, counter
08. I think weve pointed out that the one-day admissions actually started in May of grew 8%
from May of 2007 to August of 2007, the first full month we had it unrelated to anything we did. So
it started growing in 07.
The 2500 had to do with probably our physician recruitment, recruitment and case management. We
opened a good-sized hospital in Clarksville, Tennessee. I think we had, oh, four to six other major
projects we had done. We also had a strong flu season in 2008, plus one extra day in 2008. So that
tried to explain what happened in some of those Triad admissions in 07 and 08.
And I think we also demonstrated that we reduced the observation hours for people under eight hours
and over 24 to 48 hours.