e20vf
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 20-F
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR
(g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
or
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file
number: 1-10409
InterContinental Hotels Group
PLC
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
England and Wales
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
Broadwater Park,
Denham, Buckinghamshire UB9 5HR
(Address of principal executive
offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
American Depositary Shares
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Ordinary Shares of
1329/47
pence each
|
|
New York Stock Exchange*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Not for trading, but only in
connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares,
pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
|
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a
reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the
issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close
of the period covered by the annual report:
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares of
1329/47
pence each
|
|
289,472,651
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act: Yes þ No o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934: Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past
90 days: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the
registrant has elected to follow:
Item 17
o Item 18 þ
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act):
Yes o
No þ
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant
has used to prepare the financial statements included in this
filing:
|
|
|
|
|
US
GAAP o
|
|
International Reporting Standards as issued by
the International Standards Accounting
Board þ
|
|
Other o
|
INTRODUCTION
As used in this document, except as the context otherwise
requires, the terms:
|
|
|
|
|
ADR refers to an American Depositary Receipt, being
a receipt evidencing title to an ADS;
|
|
|
|
ADS refers to an American Depositary Share, being a
registered negotiable security, listed on the New York
Stock Exchange, representing one InterContinental Hotels Group
PLC ordinary share of
1329/47 pence
each;
|
|
|
|
Board refers to the Board of directors of
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC or, where appropriate, the
Boards of directors of InterContinental Hotels Limited or Six
Continents Limited;
|
|
|
|
Britvic refers to Britannia Soft Drinks Limited for
the period up to November 18, 2005, and thereafter,
Britannia SD Holdings Limited (renamed Britvic plc on
November 21, 2005) which became the holding company of
the Britvic Group on November 18, 2005;
|
|
|
|
Britvic Group refers to Britvic and its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
Company refers to InterContinental Hotels Group PLC,
InterContinental Hotels Limited or Six Continents Limited or
their respective Board of directors as the context requires;
|
|
|
|
EMEA refers to Europe, the Middle East and Africa;
|
|
|
|
Group refers to InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
and its subsidiaries or, where appropriate, InterContinental
Hotels Limited or Six Continents Limited and their subsidiaries
as the context requires;
|
|
|
|
Hotels refers to the hotels business of the Group;
|
|
|
|
IHG refers to InterContinental Hotels Group PLC or,
where appropriate, its Board of directors;
|
|
|
|
IHL refers to InterContinental Hotels Limited,
previously InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, former parent
company of the Group and re-registered as a private limited
company on June 27, 2005;
|
|
|
|
ordinary share or share refers, before
April 14, 2003, to the ordinary shares of 28 pence each in
Six Continents Limited; following that date and until
December 10, 2004 to the ordinary shares of £1 each in
IHL; following that date and until June 27, 2005 to the
ordinary shares of 112 pence each in IHL; following that date
and until June 12, 2006 to the ordinary shares of 10 pence
each in IHG; following that date until June 4, 2007 to the
ordinary shares of
113/7
pence each in IHG; and following June 4, 2007 to the
ordinary shares of
1329/47
pence each in IHG;
|
|
|
|
Six Continents refers to Six Continents Limited;
previously Six Continents PLC and re-registered as a private
limited company on June 6, 2005;
|
|
|
|
Soft Drinks refers to the soft drinks business of
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, which the Company had through
its controlling interest in Britvic and which the Company
disposed of by way of an initial public offering effective
December 14, 2005; and
|
|
|
|
VAT refers to UK value added tax levied by HM
Revenue and Customs on certain goods and services.
|
References in this document to the Companies Act
mean the Companies Act 2006 of Great Britain; references to the
EU mean the European Union; references in this
document to UK refer to the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland; references to US refer
to the United States of America.
The Company publishes its Consolidated Financial Statements
expressed in US dollars following a management decision to
change the reporting currency from sterling during 2008. The
change was made to reflect the profile of the Groups
revenue and operating profit, which are primarily generated in
US dollars or US dollar-linked currencies.
In this document, references to US dollars,
US$, $ or ¢ are to
United States currency, references to euro or
are to the euro, the currency of the European
Economic and Monetary Union, references to pounds
sterling, sterling, £,
pence or p are to UK currency. Solely
for convenience, this Annual Report on
4
Form 20-F
contains translations of certain pound sterling amounts into US
dollars at specified rates. These translations should not be
construed as representations that the pound sterling amounts
actually represent such US dollar amounts or could be
converted into US dollars at the rates indicated. The noon
buying rate in The City of New York for cable transfers in
pounds sterling as certified for customs purposes by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York on March 25, 2011 was £1.00 =
$1.6086. For further information on exchange rates please refer
to
page F-23.
The Companys fiscal year ends on December 31. The
December 31 fiscal year end is in line with the calendar
accounting year ends of the majority of comparable US and
European hotel companies. IHG will continue to report on a
December 31 fiscal year-end basis, as the Group believes this
facilitates more meaningful comparisons with other key
participants in the industry. References in this document to a
particular year are to the fiscal year unless otherwise
indicated. For example, references to the year ended
December 31, 2010 are shown as 2010 and references to the
year ended December 31, 2009 are shown as 2009, unless
otherwise specified, and references to other fiscal years are
shown in a similar manner.
The Companys Consolidated Financial Statements are
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and in accordance
with IFRS as adopted by the European Union (EU).
IFRS as adopted by the EU differs in certain respects from IFRS
as issued by the IASB. However, the differences have no impact
on the Groups Consolidated Financial Statements for the
years presented.
In keeping with UK practice IHG believes that the reporting of
profit and earnings measures before exceptional items provides
additional meaningful information on underlying returns and
trends to shareholders. The Groups key performance
indicators used in budgets, monthly reporting, forecasts,
long-term planning and incentive plans for internal financial
reporting focus primarily on profit and earnings measures before
exceptional items. Throughout this document earnings per
ordinary share is also calculated excluding the effect of all
exceptional operating items, exceptional interest, exceptional
tax and gain on disposal of assets and is referred to as
adjusted earnings per ordinary share.
The Company furnishes JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Depositary,
with annual reports containing Consolidated Financial Statements
and an independent auditors opinion thereon. These
Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared on the basis of
IFRS. The Company also furnishes to the Depositary all notices
of shareholders meetings and other reports and
communications that are made generally available to shareholders
of the Company. The Depositary makes such notices, reports and
communications available for inspection by registered holders of
ADRs and mails to all registered holders of ADRs voting
instruction cards with specific reference to the section of the
Companys website on which such notices, reports and
communications can be viewed. During 2010, the Company reported
interim financial information at June 30, 2010 in
accordance with the Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority.
In addition, it provided quarterly financial information at
March 31, 2010 and at September 30, 2010 and intends
to continue to provide quarterly financial information during
fiscal 2011. The Consolidated Financial Statements may be found
on the Companys website at www.ihgplc.com.
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Form 20-F
contains certain forward-looking statements as defined in
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with
respect to the financial condition, results of operations and
business of InterContinental Hotels Group and certain plans and
objectives of the Board of Directors of InterContinental Hotels
Group PLC with respect thereto. These forward-looking statements
can be identified by the fact that they do not relate only to
historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often
use words such as anticipate, target,
expect, estimate, intend,
plan, goal, believe, or
other words of similar meaning. These statements are based on
assumptions and assessments made by InterContinental Hotels
Groups management in light of their experience and their
perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected
future developments and other factors they believe to be
appropriate.
Such statements in the
Form 20-F
include, but are not limited to, statements under the following
headings; (i) Item 4. Information on the
Company; (ii) Item 5. Operating and financial
review and prospects; (iii) Item 8.
5
Financial information; and (iv) Item 11.
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market
risk. Specific risks faced by the Company are described
under Item 3. Key information Risk
factors commencing on page 10.
By their nature, forward-looking statements are inherently
predictive, speculative and involve risk and uncertainty. There
are a number of factors that could cause actual results and
developments to differ materially from those expressed in, or
implied by, such forward-looking statements, including, but not
limited to: the risks involved with the Groups reliance on
the reputation of its brands and the protection of its
intellectual property rights; the risks related to identifying,
securing and retaining franchise and management agreements; the
effect of political and economic developments; the ability to
acquire and retain the right people and skills and capability to
manage growth and change; the risk of events that adversely
impact domestic or international travel; the risks involved in
the Groups reliance upon its proprietary reservations
system and increased competition in reservations infrastructure;
the risks in relation to technology and systems; the risks of
the hotel industry supply and demand cycle; the possible lack of
selected development opportunities; the risks related to
corporate responsibility; the risk of litigation; the risks
associated with the Groups ability to maintain adequate
insurance; the risks associated with the Groups financial
stability, its ability to borrow and satisfy debt covenants;
compliance with data privacy regulations; the risks related to
information security; and the risks associated with funding the
defined benefits under its pension plans.
6
PART I
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
IDENTITY
OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
OFFER
STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
|
Not applicable.
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Summary
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006
has been prepared in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and
in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the European Union
(EU), and is derived from the Consolidated Financial
Statements of the Group which have been audited by its
independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst &
Young LLP.
IFRS as adopted by the EU differs in certain respects from IFRS
as issued by the IASB. However, the differences have no impact
on the Groups Consolidated Financial Statements for the
years presented. The selected consolidated financial data set
forth below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to, the Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual
Report.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the selected
consolidated financial data differs from the consolidated
financial statements issued to UK listing authorities on
February 15, 2011, as explained in Note 1 of Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Consolidated
Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
($ million, except earnings per ordinary share)
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
1,817
|
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit before exceptional operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptional operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit/(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) before tax
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On profit before exceptional items
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
On exceptional operating items
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Exceptional tax credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets, net of tax*
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the parent
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per ordinary share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
96.5¢
|
|
|
|
72.6¢
|
|
|
|
89.5¢
|
|
|
|
134.1¢
|
|
|
|
127.5¢
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
93.9¢
|
|
|
|
70.2¢
|
|
|
|
86.8¢
|
|
|
|
130.4¢
|
|
|
|
124.3¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
97.2¢
|
|
|
|
74.7¢
|
|
|
|
91.3¢
|
|
|
|
144.7¢
|
|
|
|
193.8¢
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
94.6¢
|
|
|
|
72.2¢
|
|
|
|
88.5¢
|
|
|
|
140.7¢
|
|
|
|
189.0¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Relates to discontinued operations.
|
8
Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
($ million, except number of shares)
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
Investments and other financial assets
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
Retirement benefit assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
Non-current assets classified as held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
3,118
|
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
3,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
Equity share capital
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
IHG shareholders equity
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
1,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares in issue at period end (millions)
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC paid an interim dividend of
8.0 pence per share (equivalent to 12.8 cents per ADS at the
closing exchange rate of August 6, 2010) on
October 1, 2010. The IHG Board has proposed a final
dividend of 22.0 pence per share (equivalent to
35.2 cents per ADS at the closing exchange rate on February
11, 2011), payable on June 3, 2011, if approved by
shareholders at the Annual General Meeting to be held on
May 27, 2011, bringing the total IHG dividend for the year
ended December 31, 2010 to 30.0 pence per share
(equivalent to 48.0 cents per ADS).
The table below sets forth the amounts of interim, final and
total dividends on each ordinary share in respect of each fiscal
year indicated. Comparative dividends per share have been
restated using the aggregate of the weighted average number of
shares of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC. For the purposes of
showing the dollar amount per ADS in respect of the interim and
final dividends for each of 2006 and 2007, such amount is
translated into US dollars per ADS at the Noon Buying Rate on
the UK payment date. In respect of the interim and final
dividends for each of 2008, 2009 and 2010 such amounts are
translated from US dollars into GBP at the prevailing
exchange rate immediately prior to their announcement.
Ordinary
dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pence per ordinary share
|
|
$ per ADS
|
|
|
Interim
|
|
Final
|
|
Total
|
|
Interim
|
|
Final
|
|
Total
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
5.10
|
|
|
|
13.30
|
|
|
|
18.40
|
|
|
|
0.096
|
|
|
|
0.259
|
|
|
|
0.355
|
|
2007
|
|
|
5.70
|
|
|
|
14.90
|
|
|
|
20.60
|
|
|
|
0.115
|
|
|
|
0.292
|
|
|
|
0.407
|
|
2008
|
|
|
6.40
|
|
|
|
20.20
|
|
|
|
26.60
|
|
|
|
0.122
|
|
|
|
0.292
|
|
|
|
0.414
|
|
2009
|
|
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
18.70
|
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
|
|
0.122
|
|
|
|
0.292
|
|
|
|
0.414
|
|
2010
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
22.00
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
0.128
|
|
|
|
0.352
|
|
|
|
0.480
|
|
Special
dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pence per
|
|
|
|
|
ordinary share
|
|
$ per ADS
|
|
June 2006
|
|
|
118.00
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
June 2007
|
|
|
200.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
9
RISK
FACTORS
This section describes the principal risks that could materially
affect the Groups business. The factors below should be
considered in connection with any financial and forward-looking
information in this
Form 20-F
and the cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements
contained on pages 5 and 6.
The risks below are not the only ones that the Group faces. Some
risks are not yet known to the Group and some that the Group
does not currently believe to be material could later turn out
to be material.
The
Group is reliant on the reputation of its brands and the
protection of its intellectual property rights
Any event that materially damages the reputation of one or more
of the Groups brands
and/or
failure to sustain the appeal of the Groups brands to its
customers could have an adverse impact on the value of that
brand and subsequent revenues from that brand or business.
In addition, the value of the Groups brands is influenced
by a number of other factors, some of which may be outside the
Groups control, including commoditization (whereby price
and/or
quality becomes relatively more important than brand
identifications due, in part, to the increased prevalence of
third-party intermediaries), consumer preference and perception,
failure by the Group or its franchisees to ensure compliance
with the significant regulations applicable to hotel operations
(including fire and life safety requirements), or other factors
affecting consumers willingness to purchase goods and
services, including any factor which adversely affects the
reputation of those brands.
In particular, where the Group is unable to enforce adherence to
its operating and quality standards, or the significant
regulations applicable to hotel operations, pursuant to its
franchise and management contracts, there may be further adverse
impact upon brand reputation or customer perception and
therefore the value of the hotel brands.
Given the importance of brand recognition to the Groups
business, the Group has invested considerable resources in
protecting its intellectual property, including registration of
trademarks and domain names. However, the controls and laws are
variable and subject to change. Any widespread infringement,
misappropriation or weakening of the control environment could
materially harm the value of the Groups brands and its
ability to develop the business.
The
Group is exposed to a variety of risks related to identifying,
securing and retaining franchise and management
agreements
The Groups growth strategy depends on its success in
identifying, securing and retaining franchise and management
agreements. This is an inherent risk for the hotel industry and
franchise business model. Competition with other hotel companies
may generally reduce the number of suitable franchise,
management and investment opportunities offered to the Group and
increase the bargaining position of property owners seeking to
become a franchisee, or engage a manager. The terms of new
franchise or management agreements may not be as favorable as
current arrangements and the Group may not be able to renew
existing arrangements on similarly favorable terms or at all.
There can also be no assurance that the Group will be able to
identify, retain or add franchisees to the Group system or to
secure management contracts. For example, the availability of
suitable sites, planning and other local regulations or the
availability and affordability of finance may all restrict the
supply of suitable hotel development opportunities under
franchise or management agreements. In connection with entering
into franchise or management agreements, the Group may be
required to make investments in, or guarantee the obligations
of, third parties or guarantee minimum income to third parties.
There are also risks that significant franchisees or groups of
franchisees may have interests that conflict, or are not
aligned, with those of the Group including, for example, the
unwillingness of franchisees to support brand improvement
initiatives.
Changes in legislation or regulatory changes may be implemented
that have the effect of favoring franchisees relative to brand
owners.
10
The
Group is exposed to the risks of political and economic
developments
The Group is exposed to the inherent risks of global and
regional adverse political, economic and financial market
developments, including recession, inflation, availability of
affordable credit and currency fluctuations that could lower
revenues and reduce income. A recession reduces leisure and
business travel to and from affected countries and adversely
affects room rates
and/or
occupancy levels and other income-generating activities. This
may result in deterioration of results of operations and
potentially reduce the value of properties in affected
economies. The owners or potential owners of hotels franchised
or managed by the Group face similar risks which could adversely
impact the Groups ability to retain and secure franchise
or management agreements. More specifically, the Group is highly
exposed to the US market and, accordingly, is particularly
susceptible to adverse changes in the US economy.
Further political or economic factors or regulatory action could
effectively prevent the Group from receiving profits from, or
selling its investments in, certain countries, or otherwise
adversely affect operations. For example, changes to tax rates
or legislation in the jurisdictions in which the Group operates
could decrease the proportion of profits the Group is entitled
to retain, or the Groups interpretation of various tax
laws and regulations may prove to be incorrect, resulting in
higher than expected tax charges.
The
Group requires the right people, skills and capability to manage
growth and change
In order to remain competitive, the Group must employ the right
people. This includes hiring and retaining highly skilled
employees with particular expertise or leadership capability.
The implementation of the Groups strategic business plans
could be undermined by failure to build resilient corporate
culture, recruit or retain key personnel, unexpected loss of key
senior employees, failures in the Groups succession
planning and incentive plans, or a failure to invest in the
development of key skills.
Some of the markets in which the Group operates are experiencing
economic growth and the Group must compete against other
companies inside and outside the hospitality industry for
suitably qualified or experienced employees. Failure to attract
and retain these employees may threaten the success of the
Groups operations in these markets. Additionally, unless
skills are supported by a sufficient infrastructure to enable
knowledge and skills to be passed on, the Group risks losing
accumulated knowledge if key employees leave the Group.
The
Group is exposed to the risk of events that adversely impact
domestic or international travel
The room rates and occupancy levels of the Group could be
adversely impacted by events that reduce domestic or
international travel, such as actual or threatened acts of
terrorism or war, epidemics, travel-related accidents,
travel-related industrial action, increased transportation and
fuel costs and natural disasters, resulting in reduced worldwide
travel or other local factors impacting individual hotels. A
decrease in the demand for hotel rooms as a result of such
events may have an adverse impact on the Groups operations
and financial results. In addition, inadequate preparedness,
contingency planning or recovery capability in relation to a
major incident or crisis may prevent operational continuity and
consequently impact the value of the brand or the reputation of
the Group.
The
Group is reliant upon its proprietary reservations system and is
exposed to the risk of failures in the system and increased
competition in reservations infrastructure
The value of the brands of the Group is partly derived from the
ability to drive reservations through its proprietary
HolidexPlus reservations system, a central repository of all
hotel room inventories linked electronically to multiple sales
channels including the Groups own websites, call centers
and hotels, third-party intermediaries and travel agents.
Lack of resilience in operational availability could lead to
prolonged service disruption and may result in significant
business interruption and subsequent impact on revenues. Lack of
investment in these systems may also result in reduced ability
to compete. Additionally, failure to maintain an appropriate
e-commerce
strategy and select the right partners could erode the
Groups market share.
11
The
Group is exposed to inherent risks in relation to technology and
systems
The Group is reliant upon certain technologies and systems
(including IT systems) for the running of its business,
particularly those which are highly integrated with business
operational processes. Disruption to those technologies or
systems could adversely affect the efficiency of the business,
notwithstanding business continuity or disaster recovery
processes. The Group may have to make substantial additional
investments in new technologies or systems to remain
competitive. Failing to keep pace with developments in
technologies or systems may put the Group at a competitive
disadvantage. The technologies or systems that the Group chooses
may not be commercially successful or the technology or system
strategy employed may not be sufficiently aligned with the needs
of the business or responsive to changes in business strategy.
As a result, the Group could lose customers, fail to attract new
customers or incur substantial costs or face other losses.
The
Group is exposed to the risks of the hotel industry supply and
demand cycle
The future operating results of the Group could be adversely
affected by industry overcapacity (by number of rooms) and weak
demand due, in part, to the cyclical nature of the hotel
industry, or other differences between planning assumptions and
actual operating conditions. Reductions in room rates and
occupancy levels would adversely impact the results of Group
operations.
The
Group may experience a lack of selected development
opportunities
While the Group is operating in 100 countries and territories,
if the availability of suitable development sites becomes
limited for the Group and its prospective hotel owners, for
example, due to saturation or changing geo-political
circumstances, this could adversely affect the Groups
future growth pipeline.
The
Group is exposed to risks related to corporate
responsibility
The reputation of the Group and the value of its brands are
influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the
perception of key stakeholders and the communities in which the
Group operates. The social and environmental impacts of business
are under increasing scrutiny, and the Group is exposed to the
risk of damage to its reputation if it fails to demonstrate
sufficiently responsible practices, ethical behavior or fails to
comply with regulatory requirements in a number of areas such as
fraud, bribery and corruption, safety and security,
sustainability and responsible tourism, environmental
management, equality, diversity and human rights, and support
for local communities.
The
Group is exposed to the risk of litigation
The Group could be at risk of litigation from many parties,
including guests, customers, joint venture partners, suppliers,
employees, regulatory authorities, franchisees
and/or the
owners of hotels managed by it. Claims filed in the US may
include requests for punitive damages as well as compensatory
damages. Exposure to litigation or fines imposed by regulatory
authorities may also affect the reputation of the Group.
The
Group may face difficulties insuring its business
Historically, the Group has maintained insurance at levels
determined to be appropriate in light of the cost of cover and
the risk profiles of the business in which it operates. However,
forces beyond the Groups control including market forces,
may limit the scope of coverage the Group can obtain and the
Groups ability to obtain coverage at reasonable rates.
Other forces beyond the Groups control, such as terrorist
attacks or natural disasters may be uninsurable or simply too
expensive to insure. Inadequate or insufficient insurance could
expose the Group to large claims or could result in the loss of
capital invested in properties, as well as the anticipated
future revenue from properties, and could leave the Group
responsible for guarantees, debt or other financial obligations
related to such properties.
12
The
Group is exposed to a variety of risks associated with its
financial stability, ability to borrow and satisfy debt
covenants
While the strategy of the Group is to extend the hotel network
through activities that do not involve significant amounts of
its own capital, the Group does require capital to fund some
development opportunities, and to maintain and improve owned
hotels. The Group is reliant on having financial strength and
access to borrowing facilities to meet these expected capital
requirements. The majority of the Groups borrowing
facilities are only available if the financial covenant in the
facilities are complied with. Non-compliance with covenants
could result in the lenders demanding repayment of the funds
advanced. If the Groups financial performance does not
meet market expectations, it may not be able to refinance
existing facilities on terms considered favorable.
The
Group is required to comply with data privacy
regulations
Existing and emerging data privacy regulations limit the extent
to which the Group can use personal identifiable information.
Compliance with these regulations in each jurisdiction in which
the Group operates may require changes in the way data is
collected, monitored, shared and used, which could increase
operating costs or limit the advantages from processing such
data. In addition, non-compliance with data privacy regulations
may result in fines, damage to reputation or restrictions on the
use or transfer of information.
The
Group is exposed to the risks related to information
security
The Group is increasingly dependent upon the availability,
integrity and confidentiality of information including, but not
limited to, guest and employee credit card, financial and
personal data, business performance and financial reporting.
The reputation and performance of the Group may be adversely
affected if it fails to maintain appropriate confidentiality of
information and ensure relevant controls are in place to enable
the release of information only through the appropriate channels
in a timely and accurate manner.
The
Group is exposed to funding risks in relation to the defined
benefits under its pension plans
The Group is required by law to maintain a minimum funding level
in relation to its ongoing obligation to provide current and
future pensions for members of its UK pension plans who are
entitled to defined benefits. In addition, if certain plans of
the Group are
wound-up,
the Group could become statutorily liable to make an immediate
payment to the trustees to bring the funding of defined benefits
to a level which is higher than the minimum legal requirements.
The contributions payable by the Group must be set with a view
to making prudent provision for the benefits accruing under the
plans of the Group.
In particular, the trustees of the Groups UK defined
benefit plan may demand increases to the contribution rates
relating to the funding of this plan, which would oblige
relevant employers of the Group to contribute extra amounts. The
trustees must consult the plans actuary and principal
employer before exercising this power. In practice, contribution
rates are agreed between the Group and the trustees on actuarial
advice, and are set for
three-year
terms. The funding implications of the last actuarial review are
disclosed in the notes to the Groups Consolidated
Financial Statements on page F-30.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
INFORMATION
ON THE COMPANY
|
SUMMARY
Group
overview
The Group is an international hotel business which owns a
portfolio of established and diverse hotel brands, including
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts
(InterContinental), Crowne Plaza Hotels &
Resorts (Crowne Plaza), Holiday Inn
Hotels & Resorts (including Holiday Inn Club
Vacations) (Holiday Inn), Holiday Inn Express,
Staybridge Suites, Candlewood Suites and Hotel Indigo. At
December 31, 2010, the Group had 4,437 franchised, managed,
owned and leased hotels and 647,161 guest rooms in 100 countries
and territories around the world. The Group also manages the
hotel loyalty program, Priority Club Rewards.
13
The Groups revenue and earnings are derived from hotel
operations, which include franchise and other fees paid under
franchise agreements, management and other fees paid under
management contracts, where the Group operates
third-parties hotels, and operation of the Groups
owned and leased hotels.
At March 25, 2011, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC had a
market capitalization of approximately £3.7 billion,
and was included in the list of FTSE 100 companies, a list
of the 100 largest companies by market capitalization on the
London Stock Exchange.
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC is the holding company for the
Group. Six Continents Limited (formerly Six Continents PLC),
which was formed in 1967, is the principal subsidiary company.
The Companys corporate headquarters are in the United
Kingdom, and the registered address is:
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
Broadwater Park
Denham
Buckinghamshire UB9 5HR
Tel: +44 (0) 1895 512000
Internet address: www.ihgplc.com
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC was incorporated in Great
Britain on May 21, 2004 and registered in, and operates
under, the laws of England and Wales. Operations undertaken in
countries other than England and Wales are subject to the laws
of those countries in which they reside.
Group
history and recent developments
The Group, formerly known as Bass and, more recently, Six
Continents, was historically a conglomerate operating as, among
other things, a brewer, soft drinks manufacturer, hotelier,
leisure operator, and restaurant, pub and bar owner. In the last
several years, the Group has undergone a major transformation in
its operations and organization, as a result of the Separation
(as discussed below) and a number of significant disposals
during this period, which has narrowed the scope of its business.
On April 15, 2003, following shareholder and regulatory
approval, Six Continents PLC (as it then was) separated into two
new listed groups, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (as it then
was) comprising the Hotels and Soft Drinks businesses and
Mitchells & Butlers plc comprising the Retail and
Standard Commercial Property Developments businesses (the
Separation).
The Group disposed of its interests in the soft drinks business
by way of an initial public offering (IPO) of
Britvic, a manufacturer and distributor of soft drinks in the
United Kingdom, in December 2005.
Acquisitions
and dispositions
From Separation to December 31, 2010, 185 hotels with a net
book value of $5.3 billion have been sold, generating
aggregate proceeds of $5.6 billion. Of these 185 hotels,
166 hotels have remained in the Groups global system (the
number of hotels and rooms franchised, managed, owned and leased
by the Group) through either franchise or management agreements.
At December 31, 2010, the Group owned 15 hotels.
The following provides details relating to the hotels disposed
and retained pursuant to the asset disposal program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset disposal program detail
|
|
Number of hotels
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
Net book value
|
|
|
($ billion)
|
|
Disposed since April 2003
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Remaining owned and leased hotels as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
During 2010, the Group disposed of the Holiday Inn Lexington for
$5 million and the InterContinental Buckhead, Atlanta for
$105 million. During 2009, the Group disposed of the
InterContinental Sao Paulo for $22 million. During 2008,
the Group disposed of the Holiday Inn Jamaica for
$30 million.
14
The Group also divested a number of equity interests for total
proceeds of $17 million, $15 million and
$61 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The most
significant interests sold were a 31.25% interest in the Crowne
Plaza Christchurch and a 17% interest in the Crowne Plaza
Amsterdam in 2008. In 2010, a loan repayment of $11 million was
also received.
The asset disposal program which commenced in 2003 has
significantly reduced the capital requirements of the Group
whilst largely retaining the hotels in the Groups system
through management and franchise agreements.
Capital expenditure in 2010 totaled $95 million compared
with $148 million in 2009 and $108 million in 2008.
2009 included the $65 million purchase of the Hotel Indigo San
Diego.
At December 31, 2010 capital committed, being contracts
placed for expenditure on property, plant and equipment and
intangible assets not provided for in the Consolidated Financial
Statements, totaled $14 million.
On October 24, 2007 the Group announced a worldwide
relaunch of its Holiday Inn brand family which is now
substantially complete. In support of this relaunch, the Group
has made a non-recurring revenue investment of $63 million
which has been charged to the Consolidated income statement as
an exceptional item since the 2007 relaunch. During 2010,
$9 million (2009 $19 million, 2008 $35 million)
was charged.
Return
of funds
Since March 2004, the Group has returned over
£3.5 billion of funds to shareholders by way of
special dividends, share repurchase programs and capital returns
(see table below).
A £150 million share repurchase program was announced
on February 20, 2007. During 2010 no shares were
repurchased. By March 25, 2011, a total of
14.4 million shares had been repurchased under the
£150 million repurchase program at an average price
per share of 831 pence per share (approximately
£120 million). Purchases are made under the existing
authority from shareholders which will be renewed at the
Companys Annual General Meeting. Any shares repurchased
under these programs will be canceled.
Information relating to the purchases of equity securities can
be found in Item 16E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return of funds program
|
|
Timing
|
|
Total return
|
|
Returned to
date(i)
|
|
Still to be returned
|
|
£501 million special dividend
|
|
|
Paid in December 2004
|
|
|
|
£501m
|
|
|
|
£501m
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
First £250 million share buyback
|
|
|
Completed in 2004
|
|
|
|
£250m
|
|
|
|
£250m
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
£996 million capital return
|
|
|
Paid in July 2005
|
|
|
|
£996m
|
|
|
|
£996m
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Second £250 million share buyback
|
|
|
Completed in 2006
|
|
|
|
£250m
|
|
|
|
£250m
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
£497 million special dividend
|
|
|
Paid in June 2006
|
|
|
|
£497m
|
|
|
|
£497m
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Third £250 million share buyback
|
|
|
Completed in 2007
|
|
|
|
£250m
|
|
|
|
£250m
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
£709 million special dividend
|
|
|
Paid in June 2007
|
|
|
|
£709m
|
|
|
|
£709m
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
£150 million share buyback
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
£150m
|
|
|
|
£120m
|
|
|
|
£30m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£3,603m
|
|
|
|
£3,573
|
|
|
|
£30m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
As of March 25, 2011.
|
Hotels
The Group is an international hotel business which owns a
portfolio of established and diverse hotel brands, including
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts, Crowne Plaza
Hotels & Resorts, Holiday Inn Hotels &
Resorts (including Holiday Inn Club Vacations), Holiday Inn
Express, Staybridge Suites, Candlewood Suites and Hotel Indigo.
At December 31, 2010, the Group had 4,437 franchised,
managed, owned and leased hotels and 647,161 guest rooms in 100
countries and territories around the world. The Group also
manages the hotel loyalty program, Priority Club Rewards.
15
SEGMENTAL
INFORMATION
Geographic
segmentation
The following table show the Groups revenue and operating
profit before exceptional operating items and the percentage by
geographical area, for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Revenue(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Central(2)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional operating
items(1)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Central
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
Central
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
79.3
|
|
|
|
84.7
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Central
|
|
|
(31.3
|
)
|
|
|
(28.6
|
)
|
|
|
(28.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The results of operations have been
translated into US dollars at the average rates of exchange for
the year. In the case of sterling, the translation rate is $1 =
£0.65 (2009 $1 = £0.64, 2008 $1 = £0.55). In the
case of the euro, the translation rate is $1 = 0.76 (2009
$1 = 0.72, 2008 $1 = 0.68).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Central revenue primarily relates
to Holidex (the Groups proprietary reservation system) fee
income. Central operating profit includes central revenue less
costs related to global functions.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional
operating items does not include exceptional operating items for
all periods presented. Exceptional operating items (charge
unless otherwise noted) by region were the Americas
$8 million (2009 $301 million, 2008 $99 million);
EMEA credit of $3 million (2009 $22 million, 2008
$21 million); Asia Pacific $2 million (2009
$7 million, 2008 $2 million); and Central $nil (2009
$43 million, 2008 $10 million).
|
16
BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
The Group is an international hotel business which owns a
portfolio of established and diverse hotel brands, including
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts, Crowne Plaza
Hotels & Resorts, Holiday Inn Hotels &
Resorts (including Holiday Inn Club Vacations), Holiday Inn
Express, Staybridge Suites Candlewood Suites and Hotel Indigo.
At December 31, 2010, the Group had 4,437 franchised,
managed, owned and leased hotels and 647,161 guest rooms in 100
countries and territories around the world. The Group also
manages the hotel loyalty program, Priority Club Rewards.
Industry
and market trends
2010 was a turnaround year for the global economy, with
clear signs that the global recession was easing during the
second half and business and consumer confidence returning. This
assisted the hotel industrys recovery from a challenging
economic period. The lodging industry is cyclical, tending to
reflect the state of the general economic cycle. Historically,
in previous cycles the industry has experienced periods of five
to eight years of growth in revenue per available room (RevPAR)
followed by up to two years of decline. Demand has rarely fallen
for sustained periods and it is the interplay between hotel
supply and demand that drives longer-term fluctuations in RevPAR.
The expected recovery in demand took place in 2010. The more
modest increases in industry pricing, or average daily rate,
which along with occupancy make up RevPAR, was caused by the
increase in supply of hotel rooms globally, a legacy of the
growth in hotel construction which began prior to the downturn.
The sustained success of the economic recovery is likely to be
determined by both the challenging choices policy makers are
faced with regarding austerity measures and the issues
surrounding sovereign debt, along with the response of
corporations and the financial sector. Corporations will need to
play an important role in the recovery through sustained
investment and job creation, and the Group, with an ambitious
program to open new hotels, anticipates the need to recruit
approximately 160,000 people over the next few years.
The Group monitors key industry drivers and business
fundamentals, such as RevPAR, to ensure its strategy remains
well suited to the environment and the Groups capabilities.
Different regions, countries and types of demand vary in the
speed they recover and it is our understanding of local demand
drivers, combined with a global outlook, that help us anticipate
the needs of different types of guest demand and so continue to
develop the business to meet these needs. As an example, the
Groups recent launch of new tools to support meetings and
events in our hotels was well-timed with the earlier than
anticipated recovery in this type of demand. Many commentators
thought meetings and events business would remain subdued into
2011.
There are a number of external drivers from which IHG expects to
benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
global economic recovery the global economy grew by
3.8% during 2010 (Oxford Economics), and US historic market data
show that following recessions, hotel industry revenues broadly
increase ahead of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (Smith Travel
Research). We expect the current recovery to be similar, and are
investing in the business to capture demand as it continues to
strengthen;
|
|
|
|
increase in affluence and freedom to travel in emerging
markets countries such as China are increasingly
significant as domestic and international travel markets. They
already have a sizeable hotel industry, and the importance of
hotel brands in such emerging markets is growing;
|
|
|
|
rising global travel volumes airline capacity
continues to grow, with affordability of travel improving
globally. Business travel is expected to recover in most markets
in 2011 and leisure travellers who have been
resilient in the downturn will continue to travel
both internationally and within domestic markets;
|
|
|
|
change in demographics as the population ages and
becomes wealthier in developed markets, increased leisure time
and incomes encourage more travel and hotel stays; conversely,
younger generations are increasingly seeking a better work/life
balance, with higher expectations from those providing their
accommodation. This has positive implications for increased
leisure travel; and
|
|
|
|
demand for branded hotels is growing faster than that for
independent hotels.
|
17
Our
strategy
With a portfolio of well-established brands, in the best
developed and emerging markets, the Group is using its size,
scale, people and expertise to realize its Vision of becoming
one of the worlds great companies. The Group will be a
great company when guests love to stay with us, people love to
work for us, owners love our brands and investors love our
performance. This strategy is measured by a series of key
performance indicators around Where we
compete and How we win
(pages 22 and 23).
The Groups strategy has ensured that it remains the
largest hotel company in the world, by number of rooms. By
grounding its operations and growth in its core purpose of
creating Great Hotels Guests Love, the Company uses elements of
its strategy, such as the business model of third-party
ownership, to grow faster than its global competitors.
Delivering
the elements of the Groups strategy
Competing
with an appropriate business model
The Groups business model has a clear focus on franchising
and managing hotels, rather than owning them outright, enabling
the Group to grow at an accelerated pace, with limited capital
investment. Furthermore, the Group benefits from the reduced
volatility of fee-based income streams, as compared with the
ownership of assets.
A key characteristic of the franchised and managed business is
that it generates more cash than is required for investment in
the business, with a high return on capital employed. At
December 31, 2010 87% of operating profit before regional
and central overheads, exceptional items, interest and tax is
derived from franchised and managed operations.
Where necessary, the Group actively supports its brands by
employing its own capital to showcase
best-in-class
operations through flagship assets.
The Groups business model creates opportunities to build
relationships with independent hotel owners and generate
revenues by offering access to our global demand delivery
systems, where guests can book their hotels through the
Groups booking channels, including branded websites and
call centers. The latest example is our strategic relationship
with Summit Hotel Properties Inc. (Summit), a US
hotel investment company focused on branded hotels. On any
unbranded hotel bought by Summit, the Group now has first rights
to give the hotel a Groups brand and earn fee revenues
through generating demand for that hotel.
The key features of the Groups business model are
represented in the following table and charts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Groups
|
|
The Groups
|
|
|
Brand
|
|
distribution
|
|
Staff
|
|
Ownership
|
|
capital
|
|
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
This is the largest part of our business: 3,783 hotels operate
under franchise agreements
|
|
The Groups
brands
|
|
The Group
|
|
Third party
|
|
Third party
|
|
None
|
|
Fee % of
rooms
revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed
The Group manages 639 hotels worldwide
|
|
The Groups
brands
|
|
The Group
|
|
The Group
usually
supplies
general
manager as
a minimum
|
|
Third party
|
|
Low/none
|
|
Fee % of
total
revenue
plus % of
profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned and leased
The Group owns 15 hotels worldwide (less than 1% of our
portfolio)
|
|
The Groups
brands
|
|
The Group
|
|
The Group
|
|
The Group
|
|
High
|
|
All
revenues
and profits
|
18
The following table shows the number of hotels and rooms
franchised, managed, owned and leased by the Group as at
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contracts and joint
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
ventures
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
Total
|
|
|
No. of
|
|
No. of
|
|
No. of
|
|
No. of
|
|
No. of
|
|
No. of
|
|
No. of
|
|
No. of
|
|
|
hotels
|
|
rooms
|
|
hotels
|
|
rooms
|
|
hotels
|
|
rooms
|
|
hotels
|
|
rooms
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,783
|
|
|
|
479,320
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
162,711
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
5,130
|
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
|
|
647,161
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
483,541
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
157,287
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
5,851
|
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
|
|
646,679
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,585
|
|
|
|
465,967
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
148,240
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
5,644
|
|
|
|
4,186
|
|
|
|
619,851
|
|
The Groups continuing operating profit* by ownership
type for the year ended December 31, 2010:
The Groups global room count by ownership type at
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
*
|
|
Before regional and central
overheads, exceptional items, interest and tax
|
Competing
in developed and emerging markets
When considering open hotel rooms and those in development, the
Group has leadership positions in 15 of the top 20 markets
globally. These markets alone account for over 80% of global
lodging spend. These include large developed markets such as the
United States (US), United Kingdom (UK),
and Germany, as well as emerging markets like China.
The US is the largest market for branded rooms, with
3.4 million. The segment in the US with the greatest share
is midscale, with 1.3 million branded hotels rooms, and the
Groups Holiday Inn brand family is the largest operator in
this segment.
The Group is also focused on growing in large markets such as
the UK and Germany where it ranks second and third, respectively
in terms of number of available rooms. The benefits of a large
hotel presence across these high-value self-supporting markets
for the Group include the ability to build relationships with
the largest possible number of guests.
The Group is the largest hotel company in China, the emerging
market with the greatest scale, having 0.5 million branded
rooms. The Group, which was the first international chain to
open hotels in the country, remains the largest, with close to
50,000 rooms. The rapid pace of openings for the Group and the
wider lodging industry shows that China, and other emerging
markets are behaving as the Group has seen in developed markets
over the past 50 years. The strong demand drivers for
hotels suggest these will remain key growth markets.
Outside the largest markets, the Group focuses on achieving
presence for its biggest brands in key gateway cities which show
the potential for high demand from business and leisure guests,
and where its brands can generate revenue premiums.
In the hotel industry, the future supply of hotels and hotel
rooms is visible through the pipeline, and the Groups
pipeline reflects the sustainability of its leadership position.
In 2010, the Groups portfolio opened 35,744 rooms in 29
countries, and signed a further 55,598 into the pipeline, across
38 countries. The Group currently has 204,859 rooms in 1,275
hotels under development in 64 countries.
19
The Groups pipeline ensures sustainable development in new
and emerging markets that best suit the Companys strengths
and anticipate the future needs of customers. The Group has
committed development teams ensuring a sizeable pipeline in
developing markets: during 2010 the Group opened 7,253 rooms in
Greater China, representing 20% of all new rooms opened by it
across the globe during 2010.
The Groups pipeline is the largest branded hotel pipeline
in the world, representing 18% of all hotels under development,
including those that are independent or unaffiliated.
Winning
with our scale and expertise
The major benefit the Group brings to guests who stay in the
Groups portfolio of hotels, and owners who invest with us,
is our system to help guests book and stay with us, and then
maintain the relationship with them after they leave. This
includes having hotels in key locations, great brands with
consumer appeal, efficient reservations systems, global web
presence, our loyalty rewards schemes, along with other
elements. Together, these form the largest such
system in the industry and are the engine of our
business, delivering, on average, 68% of total rooms revenue in
2010.
With continued focus on the success of this global system, we
have developed
best-in-class
marketing and technology to support our hotels and drive
incremental revenues.
Our focus on key geographical markets where we operate a large
number of hotels, such as the US, UK, China, Middle East and
Germany, means we can run hotels and our operating system with
greater efficiencies, delivering more to the consumer at a lower
cost.
The size of the global hotel market is estimated by the Group to
be close to 20 million rooms. Competitors in the market
include other branded hotel companies, both large and small,
international and domestic, and independently owned hotels.
IHG remains the largest branded hotel company, with our share
currently at approximately 10% of the branded rooms (Smith
Travel Research), and a presence in 100 countries and
territories. Leading research (Smith Travel Research) calculates
that there are 6.6 million branded hotel rooms, with the
remainder a combination of independent hotels, guesthouses and
other types of lodging.
Although currently less than half of all hotel rooms are
branded, the benefits of being part of a brand are recognized by
many owners and the growth of branded rooms has exceeded the
growth of unbranded rooms over the past 10 years. Raising
finance is still an issue globally, and branded hotels are
perceived as offering greater security through global
reservations systems, loyalty schemes, and international
networks. Branded hotel companies, such as the Group, are
attractive to independent hotel owners and are therefore gaining
market share at the expense of the unbranded portion of the
industry. The Group is well positioned to benefit from this
trend.
Hotel owners are increasingly recognising the benefits of
franchising or managing with the Group, which can offer a
portfolio of brands to suit the different real estate
opportunities an owner may have, together with effective revenue
delivery through global reservations channels. Furthermore,
hotel ownership is increasingly being separated from hotel
operations, encouraging hotel owners to use third parties, such
as the Group, to manage their hotels.
Winning
with our people and values
Our Vision can only be realized if we have collaborative and
engaged employees, delivering the right experience to our guests
through shared values and living our brands. We have extensive
on-boarding, communication, development and recognition
programs, aligned under our employment brand, Room to be
yourself, providing the right environment for our people
to be successful.
20
Our people dictate our culture, and the Group is aligned around
great values which are consistently brought to life through a
set of five behaviors, the Winning Ways:
|
|
|
|
|
Do the right thing;
|
|
|
|
Show we care;
|
|
|
|
Aim Higher;
|
|
|
|
Celebrate difference; and
|
|
|
|
Work better together.
|
Business
relationships with others
The Group maintains effective relationships across all aspects
of its operations. The Groups operations are not dependent
upon any single customer, supplier or hotel owner due to the
extent of its brands, market segments and geographical coverage.
For example, the Groups largest third-party hotel owner
controls just 3% of the Groups total room count.
The Group continued to enhance and streamline its procurement
processes during 2010, and with the implementation of
initiatives to combat waste and enhance relationships with
suppliers, the Group is striving to ensure best-practice is
employed throughout the Group. With a focus on ensuring
high-quality goods and services are sourced at competitive
prices, the Group strives to ensure enhanced value for the
Group, our hotel owners and shareholders.
IHG is proud of its strong and important relationship with the
IAHI, the Owners Association for owners of hotels in the
Groups seven brands across the world. IHG meets with the
IAHI, in large and small groups, on a regular basis and works
together to support and facilitate the continued development of
the Groups brands and systems. During 2010, the combined
work of the Group and IAHI implemented several enhancements to
the Groups system.
Examples of such enhancements include:
Holiday Inn relaunch the near completion of
the $1 billion global relaunch of the Holiday Inn brand
family;
InnSupply improving purchasing efficiencies
and streamlining the procurement processes across both
organizations;
Way of Sales developing
best-in-class
practices for the sales operations of both organizations, having
identified critical roles for generating revenues;
Celebrate Service week giving recognition and
thanks to the many thousands of front-line employees, and
emphasizing engagement through the Groups brands; and
People Tools enhancing the recruitment,
hiring, training and retention practices across both
organizations, with specific focus on reflecting the individual
qualities of each brand. These tools are supplied to all hotels:
managed, franchised and owned and leased.
Many jurisdictions and countries regulate the offering of
franchise agreements and recent trends indicate an increase in
the number of countries adopting franchise legislation. As a
significant percentage of the Groups revenue is derived
from franchise fees, the Groups continued compliance with
franchise legislation is important to the successful deployment
of the Groups strategy.
21
Measuring
our success
We measure our success in terms of shareholder value, as well as
through a set of strategic priorities. These form our key
performance indicators (KPIs) to ensure a consistent approach to
running the business. These KPIs consist of Where we
compete, including the appropriate business model, key
target markets and consumer segments; and How we
win, including financial returns, our people, the guest
experience and responsible business.
Where we compete
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key performance
|
|
Current status and
|
|
|
Strategic priorities
|
|
indicators (KPIs)
|
|
2010 developments
|
|
2011 priorities
|
|
To accelerate profitable growth of our core business in the
largest markets where presence and scale really count and also
in key global gateway cities. Seek opportunities to leverage our
scale in new business areas.
|
|
Sustained system size growth; and
deal signings focused in scale markets
and key gateway cities.
|
|
System size maintained at 647,161
rooms;
over 90% of deals signed in scale
markets and key gateway cities;
re-entry into Hawaii with a Holiday Inn
Resort;
opening our second Hotel Indigo in
London, and our first in Asia Pacific, on the Bund in
Shanghai;
17 signings of Hotel Indigo and
Staybridge Suites outside of North America; and
259 hotels opened globally.
|
|
Continue international roll-out of
Staybridge Suites and Hotel Indigo;
accelerate growth strategies in quality
locations in agreed scale markets; and
continue to leverage scale and build
upon improved strategic position during the economic downturn.
|
22
How we win
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic priorities
Financial returns
To generate higher returns for owners and the Group through
increased revenue share, improved operating efficiency and
growing margins.
Our people
Creating hotels that are well run, with brands brought to
life by people who are proud of the work they do.
Guest experience
To operate a portfolio of brands attractive to both owners
and guests that have clear market positions and differentiation
in the eyes of the guest.
Responsible business
To take a proactive stance and seek creative solutions
through innovation and collaboration on environment and
community issues, and to drive increased value for the Group,
owners, guests and the communities where we operate.
|
|
|
|
Current status and 2010 developments
Further procurement efficiencies made;
enhanced Customer Relationship Management with new
technology and campaign management tools to involve non-Priority
Club Rewards (PCR) members; and
enhanced communications with PCR loyalty program
members with refreshed loyalty systems.
Launched and cascaded our Vision to become one of
the worlds great companies;
developed management tools to deliver a branded
guest experience;
further emphasis on our culture of learning and
development with industry recognition;
Celebrate Service week a
global event to recognize our people, in partnership with the
IAHI ownership community; and
managing employee engagement.
Global pilots to identify opportunities to create
branded hallmarks with guest appeal;
near completion of the Holiday Inn
relaunch; and
grew our industry-leading loyalty program PCR, to
56 million members, contributing $6.5 billion of
global system rooms revenue.
Green Engage developed (patent pending);
rolled out to over 1,000 hotels by December 31, 2010;
collaborated with the University of Oxfords
Department of Plant Sciences to understand better how hotel
design and development impacts the environment; and
Corporate Responsibility approach defined and agreed.
|
|
2011 priorities
Capitalize on recovery of group and meetings
business;
strengthen global sales force effectiveness;
optimize revenues from third party and Group
websites;
ensure the Groups industry leading system of
delivering demand and revenue to hotels retains competitive
advantage; and
strengthen loyalty program, with enhanced member
offer.
Cascade of branded management tools to whole hotel
estate, including our franchised hotels;
ongoing partnership with IAHI ownership community
for people events;
continued focus on developing skills to deliver our
Vision and branding capability; and
opportunities for employees and communities to be
involved with Olympics partnership.
Leverage strong position of Holiday Inn relaunch
with roll-out of global marketing initiatives;
ensure growth plans of each brand aligns fully with
corporate Vision;
focus on strength of Priority Club Rewards and
visibly enhance offering to its members in hotels and across
global reservations channels; and
increase the Groups business from Priority
Club Rewards members.
Continue to roll out Green Engage to our
owned and managed hotels, and expand into the franchised estate
in all regions;
work with stakeholders, such as Harvard University,
to educate decision-makers on the Groups economic
impacts; and
continue to embed our community strategy, including
establishing the IHG Academy program and activating
our strategic partner in providing disaster recovery.
|
23
Segmental
Results by Activity
The following table shows the Groups continuing revenue
and operating profit before exceptional operating items by
activity and the percentage contribution of each activity, for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Revenue(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central(2)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional operating
items(1)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Regional overheads
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Regional overheads
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Regional overheads
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central(2)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Footnotes on page 25.
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
88.3
|
|
|
|
100.2
|
|
|
|
77.6
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Regional overheads
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
79.3
|
|
|
|
84.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Regional overheads
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Regional overheads
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central
|
|
|
(31.3
|
)
|
|
|
(28.6
|
)
|
|
|
(28.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The results of operations have been
translated into US dollars at the average rates of exchange for
the year. In the case of sterling, the translation rate $1 =
£0.65 (2009 $1 = £0.64, 2008 $1 = £0.55). In the
case of the euro, the translation rate is $1 = 0.76 (2009
$1 = 0.72, 2008 $1 = 0.68).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Central revenue primarily relates
to Holidex (the Groups proprietary reservation system) fee
income. Central operating profit includes central revenue less
costs related to global functions.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional
operating items does not include exceptional operating items for
all periods presented. Exceptional operating items (charge
unless otherwise noted) by region were the Americas
$8 million (2009 $301 million, 2008 $99 million);
EMEA credit of $3 million (2009 $22 million, 2008
$21 million); Asia Pacific $2 million (2009
$7 million, 2008 $2 million); and Central $nil (2009
$43 million, 2008 $10 million).
|
25
Global
System
In addition to management or franchise fees, hotels within the
Groups system pay cash assessments and contributions which
are collected by the Group for specific use within the System
Fund (the Fund). The Fund also receives proceeds
from the sale of Priority Club Rewards points. The Fund is
managed for the benefit of hotels in the system with the
objective of driving revenues for the hotels. The Fund is used
to pay for marketing, the Priority Club Rewards loyalty program
and the global reservations system.
Priority Club Rewards: The Groups
worldwide loyalty scheme, Priority Club Rewards, is the largest
of its kind in the hotel industry. Members enjoy a variety of
privileges and rewards as they stay at the Groups hotels
around the world. The global system room revenue generated from
Priority Club Rewards members during 2010 was $6.6 billion.
Priority Club Rewards membership reached 56 million
customers as at December 31, 2010, compared to
48 million as at December 31, 2009.
Central Reservations System Technology: The
Group operates the HolidexPlus reservations system. The
HolidexPlus system receives reservations requests entered on
terminals located at most of the Groups reservations
centers, as well as from global distribution systems operated by
a number of major corporations and travel agents. Where local
hotel systems allow, the HolidexPlus system immediately confirms
reservations or indicates alternative accommodation available
within the Groups network. Confirmations are transmitted
electronically to the hotel for which the reservation is made.
Reservations Call Centers: The Group operates
10 reservations call centers around the world which enable it to
sell in local languages in many countries and offer a high
quality service to customers.
Internet: The Group introduced electronic
hotel reservations in 1995. The Internet is an important
communications, branding and distribution channel for hotel
sales. During 2010, 24% (24% in 2009) of global system room
revenue booked via the Internet through various branded
websites, such as www.intercontinental.com and
www.holidayinn.com, as well as certified third parties.
The Group has established standards for working with third-party
intermediaries online travel
distributors who sell or re-sell the Groups
branded hotel rooms via their Internet sites. Under the
standards, certified distributors are required to respect the
Groups trademarks, ensure reservations are guaranteed
through an automated and common confirmation process, and
clearly present fees to customers.
During 2010, global system room revenue booked through the
Groups global systems (which includes Priority Club
Rewards members, central reservations and call centers, global
distribution systems and the Internet) was 68% (68% in 2009).
Sales
and Marketing
The Group targets its sales and marketing expenditure in each
region on driving revenue and brand awareness or, in the case of
sales investments, targeting segments such as corporate
accounts, travel agencies and meeting organizers. The majority
of the Groups sales and marketing expenditure is funded by
contractual fees paid by most hotels in the system.
26
Global
Brands
Brands
Overview
The Group offers hotel brands that appeal to guests with
different needs and tastes. This requires a portfolio of large
global brands, growing alongside innovative new brands to meet
the unique experiences our guests desire.
The hotel industry is usually split into segments based upon
price point and consumer expectations. The Group is focused on
the three segments that together generate over 90% of branded
hotel revenues: midscale (broadly 3 star hotels), upscale
(mostly 4 star), and luxury (5 star).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
Brands
|
|
Room numbers
|
|
Hotels
|
|
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts
|
|
|
58,429
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Crowne Plaza Hotels & Resorts
|
|
|
106,155
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
Holiday Inn Hotels &
Resorts(1)
|
|
|
230,117
|
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
Holiday Inn Express
|
|
|
191,228
|
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
Staybridge Suites
|
|
|
20,762
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Candlewood Suites
|
|
|
28,253
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
Hotel Indigo
|
|
|
4,548
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,669
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
647,161
|
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes Holiday Inn Club Vacations
(2,892 rooms, 6 hotels)
|
InterContinental
Hotels & Resorts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
Average room rate
$(1)
|
|
|
158.54
|
|
|
|
232.90
|
|
|
|
174.76
|
|
Room
numbers(2)
|
|
|
19,120
|
|
|
|
20,111
|
|
|
|
19,198
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2010; quoted at constant US$ exchange rate.
Average room rate is for comparable InterContinental hotels.
|
|
(2)
|
|
At December 31, 2010.
|
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts
(InterContinental) is the Groups 5-star brand
located in major cities in over 60 countries worldwide. With
over 60 years experience, the brands
understanding of high quality, understated service and
outstanding facilities, coupled with a genuine interest in our
guests differentiate it in a competitive segment. The philosophy
of the brand is to enable every guest to maximize the enjoyment
of their stay specializing in engaging guests with
the destination by sharing local knowledge to create authentic
experiences that enrich our guests lives and help them
broaden their outlook.
InterContinental hotels are principally managed by the Group. At
December 31, 2010, there were 171 InterContinental
hotels which represented 9% of the Groups total hotel
rooms. During 2010, nine InterContinental hotels were added to
the portfolio, while four hotels were removed.
27
Crowne
Plaza Hotels & Resorts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
Average room rate
$(1)
|
|
|
101.94
|
|
|
|
140.39
|
|
|
|
105.16
|
|
Room
numbers(2)
|
|
|
57,073
|
|
|
|
22,941
|
|
|
|
26,141
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2010; quoted at constant US$ exchange rate.
Average room rate is for comparable Crowne Plaza hotels.
|
|
(2)
|
|
At December 31, 2010.
|
Crowne Plaza Hotels & Resorts (Crowne Plaza),
in the upscale, 4 star segment, specializes in offering
state-of-the-art
business and meeting facilities that provide productive,
successful and energizing experiences to guests who believe
travel is fun and rewarding.
The majority of Crowne Plaza hotels are operated under franchise
agreements in the US and Europe, and managed in other markets by
the Group. At December 31, 2010, there were 388 Crowne
Plaza hotels which represented 16% of the Groups total
hotel rooms. During 2010, 29 Crowne Plaza hotels were added to
the portfolio, while seven hotels were removed.
The
Holiday Inn Family of Brands
The Holiday Inn family of brands is the worlds largest
midscale hotel brand family by number of rooms, and the
Groups most significant operation. Focused around a
relaxed atmosphere, the brands are designed to support both
business travellers and families. During 2010, the brand family
neared completion of a $1 billion refresh, updating their
image by upgrading facilities, service and amenities, ensuring
the brands continue to remain competitive within their midscale
markets. The Holiday Inn family was the first international
hotel chain to open in China in 1984 and the first hotel chain
to launch a direct bookings website in 1995.
Holiday
Inn Hotels & Resorts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
Average room rate
$(1)
|
|
|
95.12
|
|
|
|
115.51
|
|
|
|
88.57
|
|
Room
numbers(2)(3)
|
|
|
147,575
|
|
|
|
52,945
|
|
|
|
29,597
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2010; quoted at constant US$ exchange rate.
Average room rate is for comparable Holiday Inn hotels.
|
|
(2)
|
|
At December 31, 2010.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The Americas total includes Holiday
Inn Club Vacations (2,892 rooms).
|
Holiday Inn Hotels & Resorts (including Holiday Inn Club
Vacations) (Holiday Inn) are predominantly operated
under franchise agreements. At December 31, 2010, there
were 1,247 Holiday Inn hotels which represented 36% of the
Groups total hotel rooms, of which 64% were located in the
Americas. During 2010, 53 Holiday Inn hotels were added to the
portfolio, while 131 hotels were removed.
Holiday
Inn Express
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
Average room rate
$(1)
|
|
|
95.55
|
|
|
|
95.18
|
|
|
|
45.70
|
|
Room
numbers(2)
|
|
|
159,867
|
|
|
|
23,706
|
|
|
|
7,655
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2010; quoted at constant US$ exchange rate.
Average room rate is for comparable Holiday Inn Express hotels.
|
|
(2)
|
|
At December 31, 2010.
|
Holiday Inn Express hotels are almost entirely operated under
franchise agreements. At December 31, 2010, there were
2,075 Holiday Inn Express hotels worldwide which represented 30%
of the Groups total hotel rooms, of which 84% were located
in the Americas. During 2010, 122 new Holiday Inn Express hotels
were added to the portfolio, while 116 hotels were removed.
28
Staybridge
Suites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Average room rate
$(1)
|
|
|
94.16
|
|
|
|
112.18
|
|
Room
numbers(2)
|
|
|
20,014
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2010; quoted at constant US$ exchange rate.
Average room rate is for comparable Staybridge Suites hotels.
|
|
(2)
|
|
At December 31, 2010.
|
Staybridge Suites is the Groups upscale extended stay
brand, offering a sociable, family-like atmosphere. It was the
fastest upper-tier extended stay brand to reach the 50-hotel and
100-hotel milestones, and was ranked highest in the prestigious
J.D. Power and Associates 2009 North America Hotel Guest
Satisfaction Index Study for extended stay hotels. In 2008
Staybridge Suites opened its first EMEA hotel in Liverpool and
has since opened properties in Cairo, Abu Dhabi and Newcastle.
The Staybridge Suites brand is principally operated under
management contracts and franchise agreements. At
December 31, 2010 there were 188 Staybridge Suites hotels,
which represented 3% of the Groups total hotel rooms, of
which 96% (183 hotels) were located in the Americas. During
2010, seven hotels were added to the portfolio, and one hotel
was removed.
Candlewood
Suites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
Average room rate
$(1)
|
|
|
62.30
|
|
Room
numbers(2)
|
|
|
28,253
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2010; quoted at constant US$ exchange rate.
Average room rate is for comparable Candlewood Suites hotels.
|
|
(2)
|
|
At December 31, 2010.
|
Candlewood Suites is the Groups midscale extended stay
brand that gives its guests all the essentials they need for a
home-like stay at great value. Shortly after being acquired by
IHG in 2003, Candlewood Suites won J.D. Powers award for
highest extended stay guest satisfaction in North America in
2004 whilst also ranking first in the Market Metrix Hospitality
Index survey for customer satisfaction. Candlewood Suites
continues to lead the way in midscale extended stay lodging,
with the most properties under development.
The Candlewood Suites brand is operated under management
contracts and franchise agreements. At December 31, 2010,
there were 288 Candlewood Suites hotels, which represented 4% of
the Groups total rooms, all of which were located in the
Americas. During 2010, 35 hotels were added to the portfolio,
and one hotel was removed.
Hotel
Indigo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
Average room rate
$(1)
|
|
|
104.36
|
|
|
|
204.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room
numbers(2)
|
|
|
4,254
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2010; quoted at constant US$ exchange rate.
Average room rate is for comparable Hotel Indigo hotels.
|
|
(2)
|
|
At December 31, 2010.
|
Hotel Indigo is the Groups boutique and youngest brand,
launched in 2004, and focuses on a guest that appreciates art
and design and that is seeking affordable luxury. Hotel Indigo
provides guests with the refreshing design and intimate service
synonymous with a boutique along with the consistency,
reliability, and accessibility of a branded hotel. Each hotel is
unique and reflects its local neighborhood with local murals and
images, a vibrant color palette and locally sourced and seasonal
menu items.
The Hotel Indigo brand is principally operated under franchise
agreements. At December 31, 2010, there were 38 Hotel
Indigo hotels, 35 located in the Americas. During 2010, five
hotels were added to the portfolio, and no hotels were removed.
29
Geographical
Analysis
Although it has worldwide hotel operations, the Group is most
dependent on the Americas for operating profit, reflecting the
structure of the branded global hotel market. The Americas
region generated 63% of the Groups operating profit before
central overheads and exceptional operating items during 2010.
The geographical analysis, split by number of rooms and
operating profit, is set out in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
Room
numbers(1)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Regional operating profit (before central overheads and
exceptional operating
items)(2)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
At December 31, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2010.
|
Americas
In the Americas, the largest proportion of rooms is operated
under the franchise business model (89% of rooms in the Americas
operate under this model) primarily in the midscale segment
(Holiday Inn and Holiday Inn Express). Similarly, in the upscale
segment, Crowne Plaza is predominantly franchised, whereas the
majority of the InterContinental branded hotels are operated
under franchise and management agreements. With 3,458 hotels
(439,375 rooms), the Americas represented 68% of the
Groups room count and 63% of the Groups operating
profit before central overheads and exceptional operating items
during the year ended December 31, 2010. The key profit
producing region is the United States, although the Group is
also represented in each of Latin America, Canada, Mexico
and the Caribbean.
EMEA
In EMEA, the largest proportion of rooms is operated under the
franchise business model primarily in the midscale segment
(Holiday Inn and Holiday Inn Express). Similarly, in the upscale
segment, Crowne Plaza is predominantly franchised whereas the
majority of the InterContinental branded hotels are operated
under management agreements. Comprising 694 hotels (120,852
rooms) at the end of 2010, EMEA represented 22% of the
Groups operating profit before central overheads and
exceptional operating items during the year ended
December 31, 2010. Profits are primarily generated from
hotels in the United Kingdom, Continental European gateway
cities and the Middle East portfolio.
Asia
Pacific
In Asia Pacific, the largest proportion of rooms are operated
under the managed business model. The majority of hotels are in
the midscale and upscale segments. Comprising 285 hotels (86,934
rooms) at December 31, 2010, Asia Pacific represents 15% of
the Groups operating profit before central overheads and
exceptional operating items during the year ended
December 31, 2010. The Chinese tourism market continues to
grow, with the country forecast to become one of the
worlds biggest tourist destinations within 10 years.
At December 31, 2010 the Group had 145 hotels in
Greater China and a further 147 hotels in development.
30
The following table shows information concerning the
geographical locations and ownership of the Groups hotels
as at December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
Managed
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Hotels
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Hotels
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Hotels
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Hotels
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
7,616
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
10,015
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
19,120
|
|
Crowne Plaza
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
50,761
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
6,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
57,073
|
|
Holiday
Inn(1)
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
137,691
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
8,825
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
147,575
|
|
Holiday Inn Express
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
|
|
159,615
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
|
159,867
|
|
Staybridge Suites
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
14,280
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
5,501
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
20,014
|
|
Candlewood Suites
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
18,934
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
9,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
28,253
|
|
Hotel Indigo
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
3,639
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
4,254
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,230
|
|
|
|
392,536
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
43,848
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2,991
|
|
|
|
3,458
|
|
|
|
439,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
16,540
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
20,111
|
|
Crowne Plaza
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
15,888
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
7,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
22,941
|
|
Holiday Inn
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
38,250
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
14,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
52,945
|
|
Holiday Inn Express
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
23,241
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
23,706
|
|
Staybridge Suites
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
Hotel Indigo
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
79,950
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
39,456
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
120,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
16,889
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
19,198
|
|
Crowne Plaza
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
25,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
26,141
|
|
Holiday Inn
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
27,573
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
29,597
|
|
Holiday Inn Express
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
7,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
7,655
|
|
Hotel Indigo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
4,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
6,834
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
79,407
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
86,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
11,708
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
43,444
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3,277
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
58,429
|
|
Crowne Plaza
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
67,131
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
39,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
106,155
|
|
Holiday
Inn(1)
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
177,767
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
51,093
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
230,117
|
|
Holiday Inn Express
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
182,994
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
8,081
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
|
|
191,228
|
|
Staybridge Suites
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
14,463
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
6,066
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
20,762
|
|
Candlewood Suites
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
18,934
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
9,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
28,253
|
|
Hotel Indigo
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
3,749
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
4,548
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
7,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,783
|
|
|
|
479,320
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
162,711
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
5,130
|
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
|
|
647,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes Holiday Inn Club Vacations
(6 hotels, 2,892 rooms) within franchised.
|
Room
Count and Pipeline
During 2010, the Groups global system (the number of
hotels and rooms which are franchised, managed, owned or leased
by the Group) remained in line with 2009 at 4,437 hotels
(647,161 rooms). Openings of 259 hotels (35,744 rooms) were
driven, in particular, by continued expansion in the US and
China and offset the removal of 260 hotels (35,262 rooms).
In Asia Pacific, demand for upscale brands (InterContinental,
Crowne Plaza and Hotel Indigo) contributed 65% of total room
openings in the region.
31
The Holiday Inn brand family relaunch is substantially complete
with 2,956 hotels (89% of the total Holiday Inn brand family)
open under the updated signage and brand standards at
December 31, 2010. During 2010, the removal of
non-brand-conforming hotels contributed to the total removal of
247 Holiday Inn and Holiday Inn Express hotels (30,892 rooms).
At the end of 2010, the pipeline totaled 1,275 hotels (204,859
rooms). The Groups pipeline represents hotels and rooms
where a contract has been signed and the appropriate fees paid.
Signings of 319 hotels (55,598 rooms) represent an increase in
rooms signed from 2009 levels. Demonstrating the continued
demand for the Groups brands globally, 50% of the rooms
pipeline is now outside the Americas region. There were 25 hotel
signings (3,025 rooms) for Hotel Indigo as it gains real
momentum in Europe and Asia Pacific where, together, 12 hotels
(1,456 rooms) were signed. The Group also entered into an
InterContinental Alliance relationship with the Las Vegas Sands
Corp. to bring the 6,874 all-suite Venetian and Palazzo
Resorts into the Groups system in 2011.
During 2010, the opening of 35,744 rooms contributed to a net
pipeline decline of 5,504 rooms. Terminations from the pipeline
in 2010 totaled 25,358 rooms, a decrease of 21% compared with
2009. Terminations occur for a number of reasons such as the
withdrawal of financing and changes in local market conditions.
There are no assurances that all of the hotels in the pipeline
will open. The construction, conversion and development of
hotels is dependent upon a number of factors, including meeting
brand standards, obtaining the necessary permits relating to
construction and operation, the cost of constructing, converting
and equipping such hotels and the ability to obtain suitable
financing at acceptable interest rates. The supply of capital
for hotel development in the United States and major economies
may not continue at previous levels and consequently the
pipeline could decrease.
Americas
The Americas hotel and room count in 2010 decreased by 21 hotels
(5,979 rooms) to 3,458 hotels (439,375 rooms). Openings of 194
hotels (20,980 rooms) included key openings of the
InterContinental New York Times Square and the first Staybridge
Suites in New York, taking IHGs room count in New York
city to 6,570. The Holiday Inn brand family generated openings
of 137 hotels (13,446 rooms) and the Groups extended stay
brands, Staybridge Suites and Candlewood Suites, achieved
openings of 41 hotels (3,862 rooms). Removals of 215 hotels
(26,959 rooms) were mainly from Holiday Inn and Holiday Inn
Express hotels.
The Americas pipeline totaled 890 hotels (102,509 rooms) at
December 31, 2010. Overall signings of 30,223 rooms were
flat on 2009 as slow real estate and construction activity
continued into 2010. Notable signings included the
InterContinental Alliance established with the Las Vegas Sands
Corp., and the re-entry to the Hawaii market with the Holiday
Inn Beachcomber Resort in Waikiki Beach.
EMEA
During 2010, EMEA hotel and room count decreased by one hotel (a
net increase of 556 rooms) to 694 hotels (120,852 rooms).
Activity included openings of 33 hotels (5,767 rooms) and
removals of 34 hotels (5,211 rooms). The net decrease of seven
Holiday Inn and Holiday Inn Express hotels comprised 25 openings
and 32 removals.
The pipeline in EMEA increased by one hotel (a net decrease of
26 rooms) to 153 hotels (31,435 rooms). There were 9,303 room
signings in 2010, with continued demand for the Groups
brands in the UK and Germany. Demand was particularly strong in
the midscale segment which represented 61% of room signings.
There were eight signings for the Groups lifestyle brand,
Hotel Indigo, including four in the UK and entry into new
markets in Lisbon, Madrid and Berlin. There were also six Crowne
Plaza signings including the strategic markets of Istanbul, St
Petersburg and Amsterdam.
Asia
Pacific
Asia Pacific hotel and room count increased by 21 hotels (5,905
rooms) to 285 hotels (86,934 rooms). Openings of 32 hotels
(8,997 rooms) were partially offset by the removal of 11
hotels (3,092 rooms). The growth
32
was driven by 24 hotel openings in 17 cities across Greater
China (7,253 rooms), seven hotels (1,477 rooms) more than in
2009. This included key hotel openings in Shanghai of the
InterContinental at the Expo site and the Hotel Indigo on the
Bund, the first opening for this brand in Asia Pacific. Across
the region 65% of rooms opened were in upscale brands
(InterContinental, Crowne Plaza and Hotel Indigo).
The pipeline in Asia Pacific increased by 19 hotels (5,741
rooms) to 232 hotels (70,915 rooms). Pipeline growth was evenly
balanced between the Greater China market (nine hotels, 3,128
rooms) and Asia Australasia (10 hotels, 2,613 rooms) including
six hotel signings in India taking its total pipeline to 10,073
rooms.
Across the region there were 18 Holiday Inn Express signings,
more than double the number for this brand in 2009, indicating
the potential for midscale growth in the region. In Vietnam two
new Holiday Inn resorts were signed in the prime beachfront
locations of Cam Ranh Bay and Phu Quoc. There were also 12
Crowne Plaza signings, including the Crowne Plaza Lumpini Park
in Bangkok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotels
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
Global hotel and room count at December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
over 2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
over 2009
|
|
Analyzed by brand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
58,429
|
|
|
|
56,121
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
Crowne Plaza
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
106,155
|
|
|
|
100,994
|
|
|
|
5,161
|
|
Holiday
Inn(1)
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
230,117
|
|
|
|
243,460
|
|
|
|
(13,343
|
)
|
Holiday Inn Express
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
191,228
|
|
|
|
188,007
|
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
Staybridge Suites
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
20,762
|
|
|
|
19,885
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
Candlewood Suites
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
28,253
|
|
|
|
25,283
|
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
Hotel Indigo
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4,548
|
|
|
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
Other
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
7,669
|
|
|
|
8,899
|
|
|
|
(1,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
647,161
|
|
|
|
646,679
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analyzed by ownership type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised(1)
|
|
|
3,783
|
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
479,320
|
|
|
|
483,541
|
|
|
|
(4,221
|
)
|
Managed
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
162,711
|
|
|
|
157,287
|
|
|
|
5,424
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
5,130
|
|
|
|
5,851
|
|
|
|
(721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
647,161
|
|
|
|
646,679
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes Holiday Inn Club Vacations
(6 hotels, 2,892 rooms in both 2010 and 2009).
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotels
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
Global pipeline at December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
over 2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
over 2009
|
|
Analyzed by brand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
19,374
|
|
|
|
20,173
|
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
Crowne Plaza
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
38,994
|
|
|
|
38,555
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
Holiday Inn
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
57,505
|
|
|
|
59,008
|
|
|
|
(1,503
|
)
|
Holiday Inn Express
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
53,219
|
|
|
|
57,756
|
|
|
|
(4,537
|
)
|
Staybridge Suites
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
10,760
|
|
|
|
13,360
|
|
|
|
(2,600
|
)
|
Candlewood Suites
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
10,506
|
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
(4,345
|
)
|
Hotel Indigo
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
7,627
|
|
|
|
6,660
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
204,859
|
|
|
|
210,363
|
|
|
|
(5,504
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analyzed by ownership type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
113,940
|
|
|
|
126,386
|
|
|
|
(12,446
|
)
|
Managed
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
90,919
|
|
|
|
83,977
|
|
|
|
6,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
204,859
|
|
|
|
210,363
|
|
|
|
(5,504
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seasonality
Although the performance of individual hotels and geographic
markets might be highly seasonal due to a variety of factors
such as the tourist trade and local economic conditions, the
geographical spread of the Groups hotels in 100 countries
and territories and the relative stability of the income stream
from franchising and management activities, diminishes, to some
extent, the effect of seasonality on the results of the Group.
Competition
The Groups hotels compete with a wide range of facilities
offering various types of lodging options and related services
to the public. The competition includes several large and
moderate sized hotel chains offering upper, mid and lower priced
accommodation and also includes independent hotels in each of
these market segments, particularly outside of North America
where the lodging industry is much more fragmented. Major hotel
chains which compete with the Group include Marriott
International, Inc., Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Worldwide, Inc., Choice Hotels International, Inc., Best Western
International, Inc., Hilton Hotels Corporation, Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation, Four Seasons Hotels Inc. and Accor S.A.
The Group also competes with non-hotel options, such as
timeshare offerings and cruises.
RevPAR
The following tables present RevPAR statistics for the year
ended December 31, 2010 and a comparison to 2009. RevPAR is
a meaningful indicator of performance because it measures
period-over-period
change in rooms revenue for comparable hotels. RevPAR is
calculated by dividing rooms revenue for comparable hotels by
room nights available to guests for the period.
Franchised, managed, owned and leased statistics are for
comparable hotels, and include only those hotels in the
Groups system at December 31, 2010 and franchised,
managed, owned or leased by the Group since January 1, 2009.
34
The comparison with 2009 is at constant US$ exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
Managed
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
|
|
Change vs
|
|
|
|
Change vs
|
|
|
|
Change vs
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
58.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%pts
|
|
|
68.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%pts
|
|
|
79.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%pts
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
124.05
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
170.14
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
223.15
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
116.93
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
177.22
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Crowne Plaza
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
58.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%pts
|
|
|
70.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
97.79
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
125.36
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
57.04
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
88.63
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Inn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
58.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.8
|
%pts
|
|
|
68.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%pts
|
|
|
72.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%pts
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
94.10
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
106.74
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
106.24
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
54.64
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
73.56
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
76.98
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
Holiday Inn Express
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
61.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%pts
|
|
|
80.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
95.45
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
133.96
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
58.95
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
107.59
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staybridge Suites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
70.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%pts
|
|
|
75.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%pts
|
|
|
76.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%pts
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
92.17
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
98.16
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
89.10
|
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
64.91
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
73.96
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
68.38
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
Candlewood Suites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
67.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%pts
|
|
|
71.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.7
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
66.92
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
57.13
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
44.88
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
41.10
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel Indigo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%pts
|
|
|
62.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
102.99
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
111.17
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
60.76
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
69.65
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
Managed
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
|
|
Change vs
|
|
|
|
Change vs
|
|
|
|
Change vs
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
57.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%pts
|
|
|
65.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%pts
|
|
|
76.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%pts
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
283.71
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
210.41
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
359.89
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
162.68
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
138.55
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
275.43
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
Crowne Plaza
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
66.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%pts
|
|
|
75.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
135.32
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
156.14
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
90.48
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
118.03
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Inn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
64.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%pts
|
|
|
71.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
117.37
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
111.30
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
75.99
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
79.73
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Inn Express
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
69.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%pts
|
|
|
50.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%pts
|
|
|
70.2
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%pts
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
95.23
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
75.33
|
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
110.30
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
66.43
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
38.26
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
77.49
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
Staybridge Suites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.3
|
%
|
|
|
7.7
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112.18
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
83.39
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel Indigo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
93.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.4
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
204.65
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
191.16
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
Managed
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
|
|
Change vs
|
|
|
|
Change vs
|
|
|
|
Change vs
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
69.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%pts
|
|
|
66.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%pts
|
|
|
71.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%pts
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
181.67
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
165.41
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
358.55
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
126.65
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
110.59
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
254.97
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
Crowne Plaza
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.5
|
%pts
|
|
|
67.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
125.74
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
104.93
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
74.21
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
71.05
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Inn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
74.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%pts
|
|
|
67.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%pts
|
|
|
90.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%pts
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
84.20
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
88.51
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
129.34
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
62.86
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
59.57
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
116.52
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Holiday Inn Express
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
61.3
|
%
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%pts
|
|
|
66.2
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
47.79
|
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
45.61
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
29.27
|
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
30.20
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%pts
|
|
|
77.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily rate
|
|
$
|
108.52
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
92.30
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
76.31
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
71.03
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Regulation
Both in the United Kingdom and internationally, the Groups
hotel operations are subject to regulation, including health and
safety, zoning and similar land use laws as well as regulations
that influence or determine wages, prices, interest rates,
construction procedures and costs.
TRADEMARKS
Group companies own a substantial number of service brands upon
which it is dependent and the Group believes that its
significant trademarks are protected in all material respects in
the markets in which its brands currently operate.
ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE
Principal
operating subsidiary undertakings
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC was the beneficial owner of
all of the equity share capital, either itself or through
subsidiary undertakings, of the following companies during the
year. The companies listed below include those which principally
affect the amount of profit and assets of the Group.
Six Continents
Limited(a)
Hotel Inter-Continental London
Limited(a)
IHG Hotels
Limited(a)
Six Continents Hotels,
Inc.(b)
Inter-Continental Hotels
Corporation(b)
111 East
48th
Street Holdings,
LLC(b)
InterContinental Hotels Group Resources,
Inc.(b)
InterContinental Hong Kong
Limited(c)
Société Nouvelle du Grand Hotel
SA(d)
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Incorporated in Great Britain and
registered in England and Wales.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Incorporated in the United States.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Incorporated in Hong Kong.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Incorporated in France.
|
37
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Group companies own and lease properties throughout the world,
principally hotels but also offices. The table below analyzes
the net book value of the Groups property, plant and
equipment at December 31, 2010. Approximately 45% of hotel
properties by value were directly owned, with 50% held under
leases having a term of 50 years or longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value at December 31, 2010
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
Fixtures, fittings and equipment
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 85% of the net book value relates to the top five
owned and leased hotels (in terms of value) of a total of 15
hotels, including $183 million relating to assets held
under finance leases.
There were no assets classified as held for sale at
December 31, 2010. Subsequent to December 31, 2010,
four hotels, including the InterContinental Barclay in New York,
met the held for sale criteria of IFRS 5
Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued
Operations. Three of the properties are located in North
America and one in Australia, and all are expected to be sold
within the next 12 months. The fair value less estimated
costs to sell for each property exceeds its net book value.
Contracts placed for expenditure on property, plant and
equipment not included in the Consolidated Financial Statements
at December 31, 2010 amounted to $10 million.
Charges over one hotel totaling $85 million exist as
security provided to the Groups pension plans.
ENVIRONMENT
With over 4,400 hotels globally and almost 1,300 in the
pipeline, the Group has an opportunity to make a positive
difference in the communities in which it operates.
As such the Group is committed to:
|
|
|
|
|
Implementing sound environmental practices in the design,
development and operation of its hotels;
|
|
|
|
Encouraging the development and integration of sustainable
technologies;
|
|
|
|
Endeavoring to reduce its use of energy, water and re-use and
recycle the resources consumed by its business wherever
practical;
|
|
|
|
Engaging its customers, colleagues, hotel owners, suppliers and
contractors in its efforts to protect the environment;
|
|
|
|
Providing the training and resources required to meet its
objectives;
|
|
|
|
Monitoring, recording and benchmarking its environmental
performance on a regular basis;
|
|
|
|
Making business decisions taking into account these
commitments; and
|
|
|
|
Communicating its policies, practices and programs to all its
stakeholders.
|
Corporate responsibility (CR) is central to the way
the Group does business. Acting responsibly creates value for
its brands while helping its hotels to manage costs, drive
revenue and be prepared for the future. It also keeps the Group
in tune with the thinking of its stakeholders, and supports its
mission to champion and protect the Groups trusted
reputation, which in turn reinforces trust in the Groups
brands, builds competitive advantage and strengthens its
corporate reputation.
The Group is focused on developing better ways to design, build
and run its hotels. The Groups strategy is based on
innovation and collaboration.
38
|
|
|
|
|
Innovation the Group develops innovative
concepts and technologies, and works closely with its partners
to find creative solutions to the challenges it faces.
|
|
|
|
Collaboration the Groups stakeholders
play a key role in helping it identify and tackle its
priorities. Stakeholders include guests and corporate clients,
hotel owners and franchise holders, local communities,
employees, shareholders, suppliers, academic institutions,
non-government organizations, governments and industry-specific
institutions.
|
The Groups innovation and collaboration activities are
focused on the areas that make most sense to its business, and
where it believes it can make most difference, in its
communities. The Groups CR strategy focuses on two main
pillars:
|
|
|
|
|
Environment reduce energy use in the
Groups owned and managed estate by between 6% and 10% over
three years
(2010-2012)
via the use of Green Engage; and
|
|
|
|
Communities generate local economic
opportunities, particularly through the IHG
Academy, and provide support through disaster relief.
|
The Group chooses not simply to mitigate its greenhouse gas
emissions through the purchase of voluntary carbon offsets. The
Group believes that as a global organization with operations in
many markets, its biggest contribution towards cutting
greenhouse gas emissions will come from delivering real emission
cuts through innovating new and better ways to
design, build and run its hotels not through
offsetting.
The Groups key programs include;
|
|
|
|
|
Green Engage Green Engage is the Groups
innovative online sustainability management system, which
launched in 2009 and, which defines the Groups vision of a
sustainable hotel. Green Engage is designed to help hotels
reduce energy costs, with hotels achieving energy savings of up
to 25%. The system, which has recently received a LEED
(Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) endorsement,
allows hotels to track, measure and report on their energy,
water and waste, and recommends actions that will cut energy
bills without compromising the guest experience. The Group is
the worlds first hotel company to be awarded LEED
endorsement for an existing hotel program, further cementing its
place as an industry leader in sustainability.
|
|
|
|
IHG Academy The
IHG Academy is a public/private
partnership with education providers and community organizations
that helps the Group create local economic opportunities.
|
|
|
|
The Innovation Hotel The Groups online
innovation hotel takes visitors on a
tour of the model hotel of the future, pointing out practical
solutions and technology that can make its hotels greener and
more efficient.
|
Over 1,000 of the Groups hotels are registered to use
Green Engage and 2,000 individuals are registered as users. The
Groups aim is to have its entire global system using it
over time. In 2011 the Group will launch version 2.0 of Green
Engage based on feedback from existing users. The new version
retains all the features and benefits of the original but is
easier to use with better benchmarking.
|
|
ITEM 4A.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
INTRODUCTION
Business
and Overview
The Group is an international hotel business which owns a
portfolio of established and diverse hotel brands, including
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts, Crowne Plaza
Hotels & Resorts, Holiday Inn Hotels &
Resorts (including Holiday Inn Club Vacations), Holiday Inn
Express, Staybridge Suites, Candlewood Suites and Hotel Indigo.
At December 31, 2010, the Group had 4,437 franchised,
managed, owned and leased hotels and 647,161
39
guest rooms in 100 countries and territories around the world.
The Group also manages the hotel loyalty program, Priority Club
Rewards.
The Groups revenue and earnings are derived from hotel
operations, which include franchise and other fees paid under
franchise agreements, management and other fees paid under
management contracts, where the Group operates
third-parties hotels, and operation of the Groups
owned hotels.
Operational
Performance
Revenue increased by 5.9% to $1,628 million and operating
profit before exceptional items increased by 22.3% to
$444 million during the year ended December 31, 2010.
The 2010 results reflect a return to RevPAR growth in a
recovering global market, with an overall RevPAR increase of
6.2% led by occupancy. 2010 fourth quarter comparable RevPAR
increased 8.0% compared to the same quarter in 2009, including a
2.4% increase in average daily rate. During 2010, average daily
rate for the InterContinental and Holiday Inn brands increased
by 1.3% and 0.5% respectively.
The $1 billion roll-out of the Holiday Inn brand family
relaunch is substantially complete. By December 31, 2010,
2,956 hotels were converted globally under the relaunch program,
representing 89% of all Holiday Inn hotels. The required
improvement in quality standards contributed to the removal of a
total of 35,262 rooms from the Groups global system during
2010. In spite of this necessary reduction, the closing global
room count was 647,161 rooms, in line with 2009 levels.
The performance of the Group is evaluated primarily on a
regional basis. The regional operations are split by business
model: franchise agreement, management contract, and owned and
leased operations. All three income types are affected by
occupancy and room rates achieved by hotels, the ability to
manage costs and the change in the number of available rooms
through acquisition, development and disposition. Results are
also impacted by economic conditions and capacity. The
Groups segmental results are shown before exceptional
operating items, interest expense, interest income and income
taxes.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of the financial statements requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and costs and expense
during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management
evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those relating
to revenue recognition, bad debts, investments, property, plant
and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, income taxes,
guest program liability, self insurance claims payable,
restructuring costs, retirement benefits and contingencies and
litigation.
Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical
experience and on other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of
assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions and conditions.
The Groups critical accounting policies are set out below.
Revenue
recognition
Revenue is the gross inflow of economic benefits received and
receivable by the Group on its own account where those inflows
result in increases in equity.
Revenue is derived from the following sources: franchise fees;
management fees; owned and leased properties and other revenues
which are ancillary to the Groups operations, including
technology fee income.
Generally, revenue represents sales (excluding VAT and similar
taxes) of goods and services, net of discounts, provided in the
normal course of business and recognized when services have been
rendered. The following is a description of the composition of
revenues of the Group.
40
Franchise fees received in connection with the
license of the Groups brand names, usually under long-term
contracts with the hotel owner. The Group charges franchise
royalty fees as a percentage of room revenue. Revenue is
recognized when earned and realized or realizable under the
terms of the agreement.
Management fees earned from hotels managed by the
Group, usually under long-term contracts with the hotel owner.
Management fees include a base fee, which is generally a
percentage of hotel revenue, and an incentive fee, which is
generally based on the hotels profitability or cash flows.
Revenue is recognized when earned and realized or realizable
under the terms of the contract.
Owned and leased primarily derived from hotel
operations, including the rental of rooms and food and beverage
sales from owned and leased hotels operated under the
Groups brand names. Revenue is recognized when rooms are
occupied and food and beverages are sold.
In addition to management or franchise fees, hotels within the
IHG system pay cash assessments and contributions which are
collected for specific use within the System Fund
(the Fund). The Fund also receives proceeds
from the sale of Priority Club Rewards points. The Group exerts
significant influence over the operation of the Fund, however,
the Fund is managed for the benefit of hotels in the system with
the objective of driving revenues for the hotels. The Fund is
used to pay for marketing, the Priority Club Rewards loyalty
program and the global reservations system. The Fund is planned
to operate at breakeven with any short-term timing surplus or
deficit carried in the Consolidated statement of financial
position within working capital. As all Fund income is
designated for specific purposes and does not result in a profit
or loss for the Group, the revenue recognition criteria as
outlined in the accounting policy above are not met and
therefore the income and expenses of the Fund are not included
in the Consolidated income statement. Financial information
relating to the Fund is included in Note 31 of Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill,
intangible assets, and property, plant and
equipment
Goodwill arising on acquisitions prior to October 1, 1998
was eliminated against equity. From October 1, 1998 to
December 31, 2003, acquired goodwill was capitalized and
amortized over a period not exceeding 20 years. Since
January 1, 2004, goodwill continued to be capitalized but
amortization ceased as at that date, replaced by an impairment
review on an annual basis or more frequently if there are
indicators of impairment. The annual review is performed in the
fourth quarter. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units
for impairment testing purposes.
Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment are
capitalized and amortized over their expected useful lives, and
reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Assets that do
not generate independent cash flows are combined into
cash-generating units.
The impairment testing of individual assets or cash-generating
units requires an assessment of the recoverable amount of the
asset or cash-generating unit. If the carrying value of the
asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its estimated recoverable
amount, the asset or cash-generating unit is written down to its
recoverable amount. Recoverable amount is the greater of fair
value less cost to sell and value in use. Value in use is
assessed based on estimated future cash flows discounted to
their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that is based
on the Groups weighted average cost of capital adjusted to
reflect the risks specific to the business model and territory
of the cash-generating unit or asset being tested. The outcome
of such an assessment is subjective, and the result sensitive to
the assumed future cashflows to be generated by the
cash-generating units or assets and discount rates applied in
calculating the value in use. Any impairment arising is charged
to the income statement.
Following the full impairment of Americas managed goodwill in
2009, the remaining balance of goodwill of $92 million at
December 31, 2010, relates to Asia Australasia franchised
and managed operations. Given the substantial valuation headroom
relating to this goodwill, management believe that the carrying
value of the cash-generating unit would only exceed its
recoverable amount in the event of highly unlikely changes in
the key assumptions.
During 2010, the Group recognized total impairment charges of
$7 million across two asset categories as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment $6 million in
respect of one hotel in the Americas; and
|
|
|
|
Other financial assets $1 million in respect of
two equity investments in North America.
|
41
The hotel impairment charge was measured by reference to value
in use calculations using a pre-tax discount rate of 11.8%.
Following the impairment charge, the hotel had a net book value
of $4 million at December 31, 2010.
The equity investments were impaired following significant and
prolonged declines in their fair value below cost. Following the
impairment charges, the combined investments had a net book
value of $5 million.
Income
taxes
The Group provides for deferred tax in accordance with IAS 12
Income Taxes in respect of temporary differences
between the tax base and carrying value of assets and
liabilities including accelerated capital allowances, unrelieved
tax losses, unremitted profits from overseas where the Group
does not control remittance, gains rolled over into replacement
assets, gains on previously revalued properties and other
short-term temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are
recognized to the extent that it is regarded as probable that
the deductible temporary differences can be realized. The Group
estimates deferred tax assets and liabilities based on current
tax laws and rates, and in certain cases, business plans,
including managements expectations regarding the manner
and timing of recovery of the related assets. Changes in these
estimates may affect the amount of deferred tax liabilities or
the valuation of deferred tax assets.
Provisions for tax contingencies require judgments on the
expected outcome of tax exposures which may be subject to
significant uncertainty, and therefore the actual results may
vary from expectations resulting in adjustments to contingencies
and cash tax settlements. During 2010, exceptional provision
releases of $7 million were made in relation to tax matters
which have been settled or in respect of which the relevant
statutory limitation period has expired.
Loyalty
program
The hotel loyalty program, Priority Club Rewards enables members
to earn points, funded through hotel assessments, during each
qualifying stay and redeem the points at a later date for free
accommodation or other benefits. The future redemption liability
is included in trade and other payables and is estimated using
eventual redemption rates determined by actuarial methods and
points values. Actuarial gains and losses on the future
redemption liability are borne by the System Fund and any
resulting changes in the liability would correspondingly adjust
the amount of short-term timing differences held in the Group
statement of financial position. The future redemption liability
amounted to $531 million at December 31, 2010.
Pensions
and other post-employment benefit plans
Accounting for pensions and other post-employment benefit plans
requires the Group to make assumptions including, but not
limited to, future asset returns, discount rates, rates of
inflation, life expectancies and health care costs. The use of
different assumptions could have a material effect on the
accounting values of the relevant assets and liabilities which
could result in a material change to the cost of such
liabilities as recognized in the income statement over time.
These assumptions are subject to periodic review. A sensitivity
analysis to changes in various assumptions is included in
Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
OPERATING
RESULTS
Accounting
Principles
The following discussion and analysis is based on the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group, which are
prepared in accordance with IFRS.
For the year ended December 31, 2010 the results include
exceptional items totaling a net charge of $4 million (2009
$80 million, 2008 $85 million). For comparability of
the periods presented, some performance indicators in this
Operating and financial review and prospects discussion have
been calculated after eliminating these exceptional items. Such
indicators are prefixed with adjusted. An analysis
of exceptional items is included in Note 5 of Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional operating items
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptional operating items
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit/(loss)
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
417
|
|
Net financial expenses
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) before tax
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
316
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets, net of tax
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per ordinary share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
97.2¢
|
|
|
|
74.7¢
|
|
|
|
91.3¢
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
98.6¢
|
|
|
|
102.8¢
|
|
|
|
120.9¢
|
|
Year
ended December 2010 compared with year ended December
2009
Revenue increased by 5.9% to $1,628 million and operating
profit before exceptional items increased by 22.3% to
$444 million during the year ended December 31, 2010.
In 2010, the InterContinental Buckhead, Atlanta and the Holiday
Inn Lexington were sold for $105 million and
$5 million, respectively, with proceeds used to reduce net
debt. These disposals resulted in a reduction in owned and
leased revenue and operating profit of $19 million and
$4 million, respectively, compared to 2009.
The average US dollar exchange rate to sterling strengthened
during 2010 (2010 $1=£0.65, 2009 $1=£0.64). Translated
at constant currency, applying 2009 exchange rates, revenue
increased by 6.0% and operating profit increased by 22.3%.
Exceptional
operating items
Exceptional operating items of $7 million consisted of a
litigation provision of $22 million, an impairment charge
of $7 million, severance costs of $4 million and costs
of $9 million to complete the Holiday Inn brand family
relaunch offset by gains of $35 million from the disposal
of assets, including a $27 million profit on the sale of
the InterContinental Buckhead, Atlanta.
Compared with the previous year, exceptional operating items in
2010 were significantly lower as 2009 was impacted by difficult
trading which resulted in exceptional operating costs of
$373 million, primarily due to the recognition of
impairment charges, an onerous contract provision and the cost
of office closures.
Exceptional operating items are treated as exceptional by reason
of their size or nature and are excluded from the calculation of
adjusted earnings per ordinary share in order to provide a more
meaningful comparison of performance.
Net
financial expenses
Net financial expenses increased from $54 million in 2009
to $62 million in 2010, as the effect of the
£250 million 6% bond offset lower net debt levels and
low interest rates. Average net debt levels in 2010 were lower
than 2009 primarily as a result of improved trading, the
disposal of the InterContinental Buckhead, Atlanta and a
continuing focus on cash management.
43
Financing costs included $2 million (2009 $2 million)
of interest costs associated with Priority Club Rewards where
interest is charged on the accumulated balance of cash received
in advance of the redemption points awarded. Financing costs in
2010 also included $18 million (2009 $18 million) in
respect of the InterContinental Boston finance lease.
Taxation
The effective rate of tax on the combined profit from continuing
and discontinued operations, excluding the impact of exceptional
items, was 26% (2009 5%). The rate was particularly low in 2009
due to the impact of prior year items relative to a lower level
of profit than in 2010. By excluding the impact of prior year
items, which are included wholly within continuing operations,
the equivalent tax rate would be 35% (2009 42%). This rate is
higher than the UK statutory rate of 28% due mainly to certain
overseas profits (particularly in the US) being subject to
statutory rates higher than the UK statutory rate, unrelieved
foreign taxes and disallowable expenses.
Taxation within exceptional items totaled a credit of
$1 million (2009 $287 million) in respect of
continuing operations. This represented the release of
exceptional provisions relating to tax matters which were
settled during 2010, or in respect of which the statutory
limitation period had expired, together with tax relief on
exceptional costs, tax arising on disposals and also tax
relating to an internal reorganization in 2010.
Net tax paid in 2010 totaled $68 million (2009
$2 million) including $4 million paid (2009
$1 million) in respect of disposals. Tax paid is lower than
the current period income tax charge, primarily due to the
receipt of refunds in respect of prior years, together with
provisions for tax for which no payment of tax was made.
Earnings
per ordinary share
Basic earnings per ordinary share in 2010 was 97.2 cents,
compared with 74.7 cents in 2009. Adjusted earnings per ordinary
share was 98.6 cents, against 102.8 cents in 2009.
Highlights
for the year ended December 31, 2010
The following is a discussion of the year ended
December 31, 2010 compared with the year ended
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
%
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
Central
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional operating
items(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
71.2
|
|
Central
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(33.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional
operating items does not include exceptional operating items for
all periods presented. Exceptional operating items (charge
unless otherwise noted) by region were Americas $8 million
(2009 $301 million); EMEA credit of $3 million (2009
$22 million); Asia Pacific $2 million (2009
$7 million); and Central $nil (2009 $43 million).
|
44
Revenue increased by 5.9% to $1,628 million and operating
profit before exceptional items increased by 22.3% to
$444 million during the year ended December 31, 2010.
The 2010 results reflect a return to RevPAR growth in a
recovering global market, with an overall RevPAR increase of
6.2% led by occupancy. 2010 fourth quarter comparable RevPAR
increased 8.0% compared to the same quarter in 2009, including a
2.4% increase in average daily rate. During 2010, average daily
rate for the InterContinental and Holiday Inn brands increased
by 1.3% and 0.5% respectively.
The $1 billion roll-out of the Holiday Inn brand family relaunch
is substantially complete. By December 31, 2010, 2,956
hotels were converted globally under the relaunch program,
representing 89% of all Holiday Inn hotels. The required
improvement in quality standards contributed to the removal of a
total of 35,262 rooms from the Groups global system during
2010. In spite of this necessary reduction, the Groups
closing global room count was 647,161 rooms, in line with 2009
levels.
The ongoing focus on efficiency across the Group largely
sustained underlying cost reductions achieved in 2009. Regional
and central overheads increased by $49 million, from $209
million in 2009 to $258 million in 2010, driven by incremental
performance based incentive costs of $47 million and charges of
$4 million relating to a self-insured healthcare benefit plan.
Primarily as a result of these actions taken across the Group to
improve efficiencies, operating profit margin was 35.7%, up
1.1 percentage points on 2009, after adjusting for owned
and leased hotels, Americas managed leases, significant
liquidated damages received in 2009, an onerous contract
provision established in 2009 and non-payment of performance
based incentive costs in 2009.
In 2010 the InterContinental Buckhead, Atlanta and the Holiday
Inn Lexington were sold for $105 million and
$5 million respectively, with proceeds used to reduce net
debt. These disposals resulted in a reduction in owned and
leased revenue and operating profit of $19 million and
$4 million, respectively, compared to 2009.
Americas
Americas
Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
%
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
152.5
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
Regional overheads
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(21.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue and operating profit before exceptional items increased
by $35 million to $807 million (4.5%) and
$81 million to $369 million (28.1%) respectively.
Franchised revenue increased by $28 million to
$465 million (6.4%) and operating profit by
$28 million to $392 million (7.7%) compared to 2009.
Royalties growth was driven by RevPAR gains across all brands
and by a 4.5% RevPAR increase in total. While franchised hotel
and room count at December 31, 2010 was lower than at
45
December 31, 2009, the weighting of removals towards the
end of 2010 meant that daily rooms available actually increased
in 2010 from 2009 levels, further boosting royalty growth. Non
royalty revenues and profits remained flat on 2009, as real
estate financing for new activity remained constrained.
Managed revenue increased by $9 million to
$119 million (8.2%) in line with the RevPAR growth of 7.5%.
Operating profit increased by $61 million to
$21 million from a $40 million loss in 2009. The loss
in 2009 included a charge for priority guarantee shortfalls
relating to a portfolio of hotels. A provision for onerous
contracts was established on December 31, 2009 and further
payments made during 2010 were charged against this provision.
Excluding the effect of the provision, managed operating profit
increased by $3 million, driven by RevPAR growth of 23.3%
in Latin America.
Results from managed operations included revenues of
$71 million (2009 $71 million) and operating profit of
$1 million (2009 nil) from properties that are
structured, for legal reasons, as operating leases but with the
same characteristics as management contracts.
Owned and leased revenue declined by $2 million to
$223 million (0.9%) and operating profit increased by
$2 million to $13 million (18.2%). Improving trading
conditions led to a RevPAR increase of 6.4%, including an 8.1%
increase at the InterContinental New York Barclay. The
disposal of the InterContinental Buckhead, Atlanta in July 2010
and its subsequent conversion to a management contract resulted
in reductions of $15 million in revenue and $4 million
in operating profit when compared to 2009. The Holiday Inn
Lexington was also sold in March 2010, which led to a
$4 million reduction in revenue and no reduction in
operating profit compared to 2009. Excluding the impact of these
two disposals, owned and leased revenue increased by
$17 million (9.0%) and operating profit by $6 million
(150.0%) compared to 2009.
Regional overheads increased by $10 million (21.3%) from
$47 million in 2009 to $57 million in 2010. The
increase was attributable primarily to performance based
incentives and $4 million from increased claims in a
self-insured healthcare benefit plan.
EMEA
EMEA
Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
%
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
Managed
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
Managed
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Regional overheads
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue increased by $17 million to $414 million
(4.3%) and operating profit before exceptional items decreased
by $2 million to $125 million (1.6%) compared to 2009. At
constant currency, revenue increased by $30 million (7.6%)
and operating profit before exceptional items increased by
$3 million (2.4%). Excluding $3 million of liquidated
damages received in 2009, revenue at constant currency increased
by 8.4% and operating profit by 4.8%.
46
Franchised revenue and operating profit decreased by
$2 million to $81 million (2.4%) and $1 million
to $59 million (1.7%) respectively compared to 2009. At
constant currency, revenue increased by 1.2% and operating
profit increased by 1.7% respectively. Excluding the impact of
$3m in liquidated damages received in 2009, revenue and
operating profit at constant currency increased by 5.0% and 7.0%
respectively. The underlying increase was driven by a RevPAR
increase of 7.6%. Revenues associated with new signings,
relicensing and terminations decreased compared to 2009 as real
estate activity remained slow.
EMEA managed revenue increased by $11 million to
$130 million (9.2%) and operating profit decreased by
$3 million to $62 million (4.6%) compared to 2009. At
constant currency, revenue increased by 10.9% while operating
profit declined by 3.1%. Positive RevPAR growth in key European
cities and markets, including growth of 14.8% in the
Groups managed properties in Germany, was offset by
unfavorable trading across much of the Middle East where RevPAR
declined overall by 0.7%. At the year end, a provision of
$3 million was made for future estimated cash outflows
relating to guarantee obligations for one hotel.
In the owned and leased estate, revenue increased by
$8 million to $203 million (4.1%) and operating profit
increased by $7 million to $40 million (21.2%), or at
constant currency, revenue and operating profit increased by
8.2% and 27.3% respectively. RevPAR increase of 11.9% benefited
from average daily rate growth of 6.5% across the year. The
InterContinental London Park Lane and InterContinental Paris Le
Grand delivered strong
year-on-year
RevPAR growth of 15.0% and 11.5% respectively. Margins improved
in both these hotels as the focus remained on cost control.
Regional overheads increased by $5 million to
$36 million (16.1%) compared to 2009, mainly attributable
to performance based incentive costs.
Asia
Pacific
Asia
Pacific Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
%
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
65.9
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
Regional overheads
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
71.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific revenue and operating profit before exceptional
items increased by $58 million to $303 million (23.7%)
and by $37 million to $89 million (71.2%) respectively
compared to 2009.
Continued strong economic growth in the region was given a
further boost by the World Expo held in Shanghai from May to
October 2010. Resulting RevPAR growth in key Chinese cities was
exceptional, with increases of 55.9% and 29.9% in Shanghai and
Beijing respectively.
Franchised revenue increased by $1 million to
$12 million (9.1%) and operating profit increased by
$2 million to $7 million (40.0%).
47
Managed revenue increased by $50 million to
$155 million (47.6%) and operating profit increased by
$29 million to $73 million (65.9%) compared to 2009.
In addition to strong comparable RevPAR performance, there was a
positive contribution from recently opened hotels, with a 9%
room increase in the size of the Asia Pacific managed estate
during 2010 following a 10% increase in 2009, and a
$4 million operating profit increase due to the collection
of old or previously provided for debts.
In the owned and leased estate, revenue increased by
$7 million to $136 million (5.4%) and operating profit
by $5 million to $35 million (16.7%). These results
were driven by the InterContinental Hong Kong, where RevPAR
increased 15.3% during 2010.
Regional overheads decreased by $1 million to
$26 million (3.7%), with an increase in performance-based
incentive costs offset by the effect of the 2009 restructuring.
Central
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
%
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
Gross central costs
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net central costs
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(33.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, net central costs increased by $35 million
from $104 million to $139 million (33.7%). The increase was
primarily driven by an increase in performance based incentive
costs where no payments were made on some plans in 2009. At
constant currency, net central costs increased by
$36 million (34.6%) compared to 2009.
System
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
%
|
|
Assessment fees and contributions received from hotels
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Proceeds from sale of Priority Club Rewards points
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
(20.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the year ended December 31, 2010, System Fund income
increased by 4.2% to $1.1 billion primarily as a result of
growth in hotel room revenues and marketing programs. Sale of
Priority Club Rewards points declined by 20.3% due to the impact
of a special promotional program in 2009.
In addition to management or franchise fees, hotels within the
Groups system pay cash assessments and contributions which
are collected by the Group for specific use within the Fund. The
Fund also receives proceeds from the sale of Priority Club
Rewards points. The Fund is managed for the benefit of hotels in
the system with the objective of driving revenues for the
hotels. The Fund is used to pay for marketing, the Priority Club
Rewards loyalty program and the global reservation system. The
operation of the Fund does not result in a profit or loss for
the Group and consequently the revenues and expenses of the Fund
are not included in the Group Income Statement.
Highlights
for the year ended December 31, 2009
The following is a discussion of the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared with the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Group
results
Revenue decreased by 18.9% to $1,538 million and operating
profit before exceptional items decreased by 33.9% to
$363 million during the year ended December 31, 2009.
The results reflect the challenging global
48
economic environment faced by the Group throughout 2009. Group
RevPAR fell 14.7% during the year, with declines in both
occupancy and rate. However, stabilizing occupancy levels in the
fourth quarter indicated a slight rebound in trading conditions
which resulted in a RevPAR decline of 10.9% compared to the
fourth quarter in 2008. Furthermore, the Group continued to
achieve organic growth during the year, increasing its net room
count by 4.3% or 26,828 rooms. The Group also made significant
progress in the roll-out of the Holiday Inn brand family
relaunch, with 1,697 hotels converted globally at
December 31, 2009.
In the year, the Group took a number of actions to improve
efficiency and reduce costs which led to a reduction in regional
and central overheads of $95 million, from
$304 million in 2008 to $209 million in 2009,
including a $23 million favorable movement in foreign
exchange.
Americas
Revenue and operating profit before exceptional items decreased
by 19.8% to $772 million and 38.1% to $288 million
respectively compared to 2008. Excluding the receipt of
significant liquidated damages of $13 million in 2008,
revenue and operating profit declined by 18.7% and 36.3%
respectively.
The region experienced challenging trading conditions throughout
the year leading to RevPAR, revenue and profit declines across
all ownership types. Despite RevPAR declines, the regions
US comparable hotels demonstrated outperformance relative to the
US market.
Franchised revenue and operating profit decreased by 11.7% to
$437 million and 14.6% to $364 million respectively,
compared to 2008. This decrease was predominantly driven by a
fall in royalty revenues as a consequence of a RevPAR decline of
14.3%. Revenues also included the impact of a decline in real
estate activity leading to lower fees associated with activities
such as the signing of new hotels and conversions. An increase
in overall room supply partially offset the decline in revenue
and profit.
Managed revenues decreased by 34.5% to $110 million during
the year or, by 29.0% excluding the impact of $13 million
in liquidated damages received in 2008. All brands were impacted
by the economic downturn which resulted in RevPAR declines of
17.8%. Operating profit declined by $91 million
($78 million excluding liquidated damages) resulting in a
loss of $40 million. The loss was due to the RevPAR driven
revenue declines, the Group funding owners priority return
shortfalls on a number of hotels managed by one owner and
certain guarantee payments. At 2009 year end, an exceptional
charge of $91 million was recognized comprising the write
off of a deposit related to the priority return contracts and
the total estimated net cash outflows to this owner under the
guarantee. Therefore, future payments to this owner will be
charged against the provision and will not impact operating
results. The managed results also included the impact of
provisions recognized following the devaluation of the
Venezuelan currency and the potential impact of asset
nationalization.
Results from managed operations include revenues of
$71 million (2008 $88 million) and operating profit of
$nil (2008 $6 million) from properties that are structured,
for legal reasons, as operating leases but with the same
characteristics as management contracts.
Owned and leased revenue declined by 25.0% to $225 million
and operating profit decreased by 80.0% to $11 million.
Underlying trading was driven by RevPAR declines, including the
InterContinental brand with a decline of 28.2%. Trading at the
InterContinental New York Barclay, in particular, was severely
impacted by the collapse of the financial markets. Results also
included the impact of the sale of the Holiday Inn Jamaica, sold
in August 2008, which led to a reduction in revenue and
operating profit of $16 million and $2 million
respectively when compared to 2008.
As a result of the declining real estate market the
InterContinental Buckhead, Atlanta and Staybridge Suites Denver
Cherry Creek no longer met the criteria for designation as held
for sale assets and consequently the results of these hotels are
no longer categorized as discontinued operations and comparative
figures have been re-presented accordingly.
Regional overheads declined 29.9% during the year, from
$67 million to $47 million. The favorable movement was
driven by increased efficiencies and the impact of an
organizational restructuring undertaken to further align the
regional structure with the requirements of the Groups
owners and hotels.
49
EMEA
Revenue and operating profit before exceptional items decreased
by 23.4% to $397 million and 25.7% to $127 million,
respectively. At constant currency, revenue and operating profit
before exceptional items decreased by 16.8% and 22.8%,
respectively. The region received significant liquidated damages
totaling $16 million in 2008 and $3 million in 2009.
Excluding these receipts, revenue declined by 21.5% and
operating profit before exceptional items declined by 20.0%, and
at constant currency by 14.7% and 16.8%, respectively.
During the year, RevPAR declines were experienced across the
region, with declines in key markets ranging from 9.8% in the UK
to 17.8% in Continental Europe.
Franchised revenue and operating profit decreased by 24.5% to
$83 million and 20.0% to $60 million, respectively, or
at constant currency by 18.2% and 13.3%, respectively. Excluding
the impact of $3 million in liquidated damages received in
2009 and $7 million received in 2008, revenue and operating
profit declined by 22.3% and 16.2% respectively, or at constant
currency by 15.5% and 8.8% respectively. The decline was
principally driven by RevPAR declines across Continental Europe
and the UK, partly offset by a 6% increase in room count.
EMEA managed revenue and operating profit decreased by 29.2% to
$119 million and by 31.6% to $65 million,
respectively, or at constant currency by 25.0% and 29.5%,
respectively. Excluding the impact of $9 million in
liquidated damages received in 2008, revenue and operating
profit declined by 25.2% and 24.4%, respectively, or at constant
currency by 20.8% and 22.1%, respectively. The results were
driven by managed RevPAR declines of 14.9%.
Owned and leased revenue decreased by 18.8% to $195 million
and operating profit decreased by 26.7% to $33 million, or
at constant currency by 10.4% and 17.8% respectively. The
InterContinental Paris Le Grand, in particular, was adversely
impacted by the economic downturn as both business and leisure
travel declined in Paris. However, trading at the
InterContinental London Park Lane was more resilient, with
RevPAR down just 1.7% during the year.
Regional overheads decreased by 29.5% to $31 million due to
improved efficiencies and cost savings, as well as a favorable
movement in foreign exchange of $6 million.
Asia
Pacific
Asia Pacific revenue and operating profit before exceptional
items decreased by 15.5% to $245 million and 23.5% to
$52 million, respectively. Excluding the receipt of
$4 million in significant liquidated damages in 2008,
revenue and operating profit declined by 14.3% and 18.8%
respectively. Despite RevPAR declines of 13.5%, the
regions brands demonstrated outperformance relative to the
market.
Franchised revenues and operating profit decreased by 38.9% to
$11 million and by 37.5% to $5 million, respectively.
Excluding the impact of $4 million liquidated damages
received in 2008, revenue decreased by 21.4% and profit
increased by $1 million or 25.0%. The decline in revenue
was driven by lower RevPARs and the loss of royalties following
the removal of six hotels (1,067 rooms) which did not meet
IHGs brand and quality standards.
Managed revenue decreased by 7.1% to $105 million and
operating profit decreased by 20.0% to $44 million. RevPAR
across the Greater China managed estate declined 15.6%,
primarily due to room oversupply in key Chinese cities, such as
Beijing and trading upside in 2008 from the Olympic Games.
Owned and leased revenue decreased by 18.9% to $129 million
and operating profit decreased by 30.2% to $30 million.
These results were driven by the InterContinental Hong Kong,
where RevPAR declined 22.2% during the year.
Regional overheads decreased by 28.9% to $27 million, due
to the impact of regional restructuring and lower marketing
costs associated with the ANA joint venture in Japan.
Central
During 2009, net central costs decreased by 32.9% from
$155 million to $104 million. The significant
reduction was driven by management actions to increase
efficiencies and implement cost-saving measures across
50
the Group. Relative to 2008, the 2009 net central costs
also benefited from a $16 million favorable movement in
foreign exchange whilst the 2008 results included the receipt of
a favorable $3 million insurance settlement.
System
Fund
In the year ended December 31, 2009, System Fund income
increased by 1.8% to $1.01 billion primarily as a result of
the growth in system size and marketing programs.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources
of Liquidity
The Group is primarily financed by a $1.6 billion
syndicated bank facility which expires in May 2013 (the
Syndicated Facility) and £250 million of
public bonds which are repayable on December 9, 2016.
Short-term borrowing requirements are met from drawings under
bilateral bank facilities. Additional funding is provided by the
99-year
finance lease on the InterContinental Boston.
The £250 million public bonds were issued on
December 9, 2009 at a coupon of 6% and were initially
priced at 99.465% of face value and are unsecured. Interest is
payable annually on December 9, in each year commencing
December 9, 2010 to the maturity date. Currency swaps were
transacted at the same time the bonds were issued in order to
swap its proceeds and interest flows into US dollars. The
reasons for issuing the bonds were to diversify the Groups
funding sources and extend the duration of a portion of its
borrowings.
At December 31, 2010, total borrowings were
$794 million, including the finance lease creditor of
$206 million. The currency denomination of the borrowings
was $303 million of US dollar denominated borrowings,
$385 million of sterling denominated borrowings,
$100 million of euro denominated borrowings and
$6 million of borrowings denominated in other currencies,
mainly Hong Kong dollars. The impact of currency swaps traded in
December 2009 is to convert the sterling denominated borrowings
above into US dollar denominated borrowings.
At December 31, 2010, total committed bank facilities
amounted to $1,605 million of which $1,400 million
were unutilized. Uncommitted facilities totaled
$53 million. In the Groups opinion, the available
facilities are sufficient for the Groups present
requirements.
The Group held cash and short-term deposits at December 31,
2010 amounting to $78 million. Credit risk is minimized by
operating a policy that generally restricts the investment of
surplus cash to counterparties with an A credit rating or better
or those providing adequate security. Limits are also set on the
amounts invested with individual counterparties. Notwithstanding
that counterparties must have an A credit rating or better,
during periods of significant financial market turmoil,
counterparty exposure limits are significantly reduced and
counterparty credit exposure reviews are broadened to include
the relative placing of credit default swap pricings. Most of
the Groups surplus funds are held in the United Kingdom or
United States and there are no material funds where repatriation
is restricted as a result of foreign exchange regulations.
The Syndicated Facility contains two financial covenants:
interest cover and net debt divided by earnings before interest,
tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Net
debt is calculated as total borrowings less cash and cash
equivalents. The Group is in compliance with all of the
financial covenants in its loan documents, none of which is
expected to present a material restriction on funding in the
near future.
Further details of exchange and interest rate risk and financial
instruments are disclosed in Item 11. Quantitative
and qualitative disclosures about market risk.
Cash
From Operating Activities
Net cash from operating activities totaled $462 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010 (2009 $432 million).
Cash flow from operating activities is the principal source of
cash used to fund the ongoing operating expenses, interest
payments, maintenance capital expenditure and dividend payments
of the Group. The Group believes that
51
the requirements of its existing business and future investment
can be met from cash generated internally, disposition of assets
and external finance expected to be available to it.
Cash
From Investing Activities
Net cash inflows from investing activities totaled
$36 million (2009 $114 million outflow) comprising
proceeds (net of tax paid) from the disposal of hotels and
investments of $131 million (2009 $34 million) and
capital expenditure of $95 million (2009
$148 million). Proceeds in 2010 included $105 million
from the sale of the InterContinental Buckhead, Atlanta. Capital
expenditure in 2009 included $65 million for the
acquisition of the Hotel Indigo San Diego.
Cash
Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $447 million
(2009 $362 million), including a reduction in gross
borrowings of $292 million (2009 $249 million).
Returns to shareholders, comprising dividend payments, totaled
$121 million (2009 $118 million). The share repurchase
program was suspended in 2008.
Overall net debt decreased during the year by $349 million
to $743 million at December 31, 2010.
The Group had committed contractual capital expenditure of
$14 million at December 31, 2010 (2009
$9 million).
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2010, the Group had no off-balance sheet
arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a
current or future effect on the Groups financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or
capital resources that is material to investors.
Contractual
Obligations
The Group had the following contractual obligations outstanding
as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
committed
|
|
1 year
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Long-term
debt(i)(ii)
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
Interest
payable(ii)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Finance lease
obligations(iii)
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
Agreed pension scheme
contributions(iv)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Capital contracts placed
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,886
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
4,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Repayment period classified
according to the related facility maturity date.
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Including the impact of derivatives.
|
|
(iii)
|
|
Represents the minimum lease
payments related to the
99-year
lease on the InterContinental Boston. Payments under the lease
step up at regular intervals over the lease term.
|
|
(iv)
|
|
Primarily relates to the recovery
plan agreed with trustees of the InterContinental Hotels UK
Pension Plan (see below).
|
In limited cases, the Group may provide performance guarantees
to third-party hotel owners to secure management contracts.
Forecast payments of $32 million have been provided for in
the financial statements and the maximum unprovided exposure
under such guarantees was $90 million at December 31,
2010.
As of December 31, 2010, the Group had outstanding letters
of credit of $54 million mainly relating to self insurance
programs.
52
The Group may guarantee loans made to facilitate third-party
ownership of hotels in which the Group has an equity interest
and also a management contract. As of December 31, 2010,
there were no such guarantees in place.
The Group has given warranties in respect of the disposal of
certain of its former subsidiaries and hotels. It is the view of
the Directors that, other than to the extent that liabilities
have been provided for in the Consolidated Financial Statements,
such warranties are not expected to result in material financial
loss to the Group.
Pension
Plan Commitments
The Group operates the following material defined benefits
plans: the InterContinental Hotels UK Pension Plan and, in the
United States, the InterContinental Hotels Pension Plan and the
InterContinental Hotels non-qualified plans.
On an IAS 19 Employee Benefits basis, the
InterContinental Hotels UK Pension Plan had a deficit of
$34 million at December 31, 2010, including the tax
that would be deducted at source in respect of a refund of
surplus taking into account amounts payable under funding
commitments. The defined benefits section of this Plan is closed
to new members. In addition, there are unfunded UK pension
arrangements for certain members affected by the lifetime
allowance; at December 31, 2010, these arrangements had an
IAS 19 deficit of $55 million. In 2011, the Group expects
to make regular contributions to the UK pension plan of
£5 million.
The most recent actuarial valuation of the InterContinental
Hotels UK Pension Plan was carried out as of March 31, 2009
and showed a deficit of £129 million on a funding
basis. Under the recovery plan agreed with the trustees, the
Group aims to eliminate this deficit by March 2017 through
additional Company contributions of up to £100 million
and projected investment returns. The agreed additional
contributions comprise three annual payments of
£10 million; £10 million was paid in August
2010 and two further payments of £10 million are due
on or before July 31, 2011 and 2012, together with further
payments related to the disposal of hotels (7.5% of net sales
proceeds) and growth in the Groups EBITDA above specified
targets. If required in 2017, a top-up payment will be made to
bring the total additional contributions up to
£100 million. The InterContinental Hotels UK Pension
Plan is formally valued every three years and future valuations
could lead to changes in the amounts payable beyond March 2012.
In 2011, the Group expects to make additional contributions of
£14 million under these arrangements with further
amounts payable if there are any hotel disposals.
The US-based plans are closed to new members and pensionable
service no longer accrues for current employee members. On an
IAS 19 basis, at December 31, 2010 the plans had a combined
deficit of $82 million. In 2011, the Group expects to make
contributions to these plans of $10 million.
The Group is exposed to the funding risks in relation to the
defined benefit sections of the InterContinental Hotels UK
Pension Plan and the US-based InterContinental Hotels Pension
Plan, as explained in Item 3. Key
information Risk factors.
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
DIRECTORS,
SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
DIRECTORS
AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
Overall strategic direction of the Group is provided by the
Board of directors, comprising executive and non-executive
directors, and by members of the executive committee.
53
The directors and officers of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
at March 25, 2011 were:
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initially
|
|
Date of next
|
|
|
|
|
appointed to
|
|
reappointment
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
the Board
|
|
by
shareholders(1)
|
|
James Abrahamson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Graham
Allan(2)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
Director and Chief Executive
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
David
Kappler(2)
|
|
Director and Senior Independent Director
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Kirk Kinsell
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Ralph
Kugler(2)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Jennifer
Laing(2)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Jonathan
Linen(2)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
Director and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
David Webster
|
|
Director and Chairman
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Ying
Yeh(2)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The new UK Corporate Governance
Code recommends that all Directors of FTSE 350 companies
submit themselves for election or re-election (as appropriate)
by shareholders every year. Although IHG is not obliged to
follow this recommendation until its Annual General Meeting in
2012, the Board has decided to submit the appointment of all its
Directors for shareholder approval in 2011. Therefore, all
Directors will retire and offer themselves for election or
re-election at the next Annual General Meeting.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Non-executive independent director.
|
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initially appointed
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
to position
|
|
Tom Conophy
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Tracy Robbins
|
|
Executive Vice President, Human Resources & Group
Operations Support
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Tom Seddon
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
George Turner
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Company Secretary
|
|
|
2009
|
|
On March 16, 2011 the Company announced that Andrew
Cosslett will step down as Chief Executive on June 30,
2011, and will be succeeded by Richard Solomons. A Director
since 2003 and currently Chief Financial Officer and Head of
Commercial Development, Richard Solomons will start in his new
position as Chief Executive on July 1, 2011.
Directors
and Officers
David
Webster, Non-Executive Chairman
Appointed Deputy Chairman and Senior Independent Director of
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC on the separation of Six
Continents PLC in April 2003. Appointed Non-Executive Chairman
on January 1, 2004. Also Non-Executive Chairman of Makinson
Cowell Limited, a capital markets advisory firm, a Non-Executive
Director of Amadeus IT Holding SA, a transaction processing and
technology solutions company for the travel and tourism
industry, a member of the Appeals Committee of the Panel on
Takeovers and Mergers and a Director of Temple Bar Investment
Trust PLC. Formerly Chairman of Safeway plc and a
Non-Executive Director of Reed Elsevier PLC. Chairman of the
Nomination Committee. Age 66.
54
Andrew
Cosslett, Chief Executive
Appointed Chief Executive in February 2005, joining the Group
from Cadbury Schweppes plc where he was most recently President,
Europe, Middle East & Africa. During his career at
Cadbury Schweppes he held a variety of senior regional
management and marketing roles in the UK and Asia Pacific. Also
has over 11 years experience in brand marketing with
Unilever. A member of the Executive Committee of the World
Travel & Tourism Council and a member of the
Presidents Committee of the CBI. Andrew Cosslett will step
down as Chief Executive on June 30, 2011. Age 55.
James
Abrahamson, President, The Americas
Appointed a Director in August 2010. Has over
32 years experience in hotel operations, branding,
development and franchise relations. Joined the Group as an
Executive Committee member with responsibility for the Americas
region in January 2009 from Global Hyatt Corporation, where he
served as Head of Development, The Americas. Previously Senior
Vice President, Hilton Hotels Corporation for 12 years.
Responsible for the business development and performance of all
the hotel brands and properties in the Americas region.
Age 55.
Kirk
Kinsell, President, EMEA
Appointed a Director in August 2010, retaining his
responsibility for the EMEA region, which he had held as an
Executive Committee member since September 2007. Has over
28 years experience in the hospitality industry,
including senior franchise positions with Holiday Inn
Corporation and ITT Sheraton, prior to joining the Group in 2002
as Senior Vice President, Chief Development Officer for the
Americas region. Responsible for the business development and
performance of all the hotel brands and properties in the EMEA
region. Age 56.
Richard
Solomons, Chief Financial Officer and Head of Commercial
Development
Qualified as a chartered accountant in 1985, followed by seven
years in investment banking, based in London and New York.
Joined the Group in 1992 and held a variety of senior finance
and operational roles. Appointed Finance Director of the Hotels
business in October 2002 in anticipation of the separation of
Six Continents PLC in April 2003. Responsible for corporate and
regional finance, Group financial control, strategy, investor
relations, tax, treasury, commercial development and
procurement. Richard Solomons will be appointed Chief Executive
on July 1, 2011. Age 49.
Graham
Allan, Non-Executive Director
Appointed a Director in January 2010. Became Chief Executive
Officer of Yum! Restaurants International, a subsidiary of Yum!
Brands, Inc., in 2010 after serving as President since 2003.
Previously Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
of Yum! Restaurants International in Europe. Has over
19 years experience in brand management, marketing,
franchising and retail development. Age 55.
David
Kappler, Senior Independent Non-Executive Director
Appointed a Director and Senior Independent Director in June
2004. A Non-Executive Director of Shire plc. A qualified
accountant and formerly Chief Financial Officer of Cadbury
Schweppes plc and Non-Executive Chairman of Premier Foods plc.
Also served as a Non-Executive Director of Camelot Group plc and
HMV Group plc. A member of the Trilantic Europe Advisory
Council. Chairman of the Audit Committee. Age 64.
Ralph
Kugler, Non-Executive Director
Appointed a Director in April 2003. Also Chairman of
Byotrol plc, a hygiene technology company, a Non-Executive
Director of Discovery Group Holdings Ltd, a PR services company,
Board Adviser at Mars, Incorporated, the global consumer
business, a Non-Executive Director of Spotless Holding SAS, a
consumer products business, and Senior Advisor to 3i plc.
Previously Director on the boards of Unilever PLC and Unilever
N.V. until May 2008 with his last role as Global President,
Unilever Home and Personal Care. Chairman of the Remuneration
Committee. Age 55.
55
Jennifer
Laing, Non-Executive Director
Appointed a Director in August 2005. Was Associate Dean,
External Relations at London Business School, until 2007. A
Fellow of the Marketing Society and of the Institute of
Practitioners in Advertising, has over 30 years
experience in advertising including 16 years with
Saatchi & Saatchi. Also a Non-Executive Director of
Hudson Highland Group Inc., a US human resources company.
Chairman of the Corporate Responsibility Committee. Age 64.
Jonathan
Linen, Non-Executive Director
Appointed a Director in December 2005. Was formerly Vice
Chairman of the American Express Company, having held a range of
senior positions throughout his career of over 35 years
with American Express. A Non-Executive Director of Yum! Brands,
Inc. and of Modern Bank N.A., a US private banking company. Also
serves on a number of US Councils and advisory boards.
Age 67.
Ying Yeh,
Non-Executive Director
Appointed a Director in December 2007. Vice President and
Chairman, Greater China Region, Nalco Company, a water
treatment and process improvement company. Previously Chairman
and President, North Asia Region, President, Business
Development, Asia Pacific Region and Vice President, Eastman
Kodak Company. Also a Non-Executive Director of AB Volvo. Was,
for 15 years, a diplomat with the US Foreign Service in
Hong Kong and Beijing until 1997. Age 62.
Other
members of the Executive Committee
Tom
Conophy, Executive Vice President and Chief Information
Officer
Has over 30 years experience in the IT industry,
including management and development of new technology solutions
within the travel and hospitality business. Joined the Group in
February 2006 from Starwood Hotels & Resorts
International where he held the position of Executive Vice
President & Chief Technology Officer. Responsible for
global technology, including IT systems and information
management throughout the Group. Age 50.
Tracy
Robbins, Executive Vice President, Human Resources &
Group Operations Support
Has over 25 years experience in line and HR roles in
service industries. Joined the Group in December 2005 from
Compass Group PLC, a world leading food service company, where
she was Group Human Resources Leadership & Development
Director. Previously Group HR Director for Forte Hotels Group.
Has global responsibility for talent management, leadership
development, reward strategy, organizational capability and
operations support. Age 47.
Tom
Seddon, Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing
Officer
Has over 18 years experience in sales and marketing
in the hospitality industry, including with IHGs
predecessor parent companies from 1994 to 2004. Rejoined the
Group in November 2007, from restaurant business
SUBWAY®
where he was responsible for worldwide sales and marketing
activities. Has responsibility for worldwide brand management,
reservations,
e-commerce,
global sales, relationship and distribution marketing and
loyalty programs. Age 42.
George
Turner, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Company
Secretary
Solicitor, qualified to private practice in 1995. After
12 years with Imperial Chemical Industries PLC, where he
was most recently Deputy Company Secretary, he joined the Group
in September 2008. Appointed Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Company Secretary in January 2009. Responsible for
corporate governance, risk management, insurance, data privacy,
internal audit, company secretariat, legal and corporate
responsibility & public affairs. Age 40.
56
There are no family relationships between any of the persons
named above.
There are no arrangements or understandings with major
shareholders, customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which
any person named above was selected as a director or member of
senior management.
COMPENSATION
In fiscal 2010, the aggregate compensation (including pension
contributions, bonus and awards under the long term incentive
plans) of the directors and officers of the Company was
$23.6 million. The aggregate amount set aside or accrued by
the Company in fiscal 2010 to provide pension retirement or
similar benefits for those individuals was $0.6 million. An
amount of $9.4 million was charged in fiscal 2010 in
respect of bonuses payable to them under performance related
cash bonus schemes and long term incentive plans.
Note 3 of Notes to the Financial Statements sets out the
individual compensation of the directors. The following are
details of the Companys principal share schemes, in which
the directors of the Company participated during the period.
Annual
Bonus Plan
The IHG Annual Bonus Plan (ABP), enables eligible employees,
including Executive Directors, to receive all or part of their
bonus in the form of shares together with, in certain cases, a
matching award of free shares up to half the deferred amount.
The bonus and any matching shares awarded are released on the
third anniversary of the award date. The bonuses in 2007 were
eligible for matching shares, all of which were released on the
third anniversary of the award date. In 2007, participants could
defer up to 100% of the total annual bonus, with the deferred
amount being accounted for as a share-based payment. Under the
terms of the 2008, 2009 and 2010 plans a fixed percentage of the
bonus is awarded in the form of shares with no voluntary
deferral and no matching shares.
The awards in all of the plans are conditional on the
participants remaining in the employment of a participating
company or leaving for a qualifying reason as set out in the
plan rules. Participation in the ABP is at the discretion of the
Remuneration Committee. The number of shares is calculated by
dividing a specific percentage of the participants annual
performance-related bonus by the middle market quoted prices on
the three consecutive dealing days immediately preceding the
date of grant. A number of executives participated in the plan
during the year, however, no conditional rights over shares were
awarded to participants.
Long Term
Incentive Plan
The Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) allows Executive Directors
and eligible employees to receive share awards, subject to the
satisfaction of performance conditions, set by the Remuneration
Committee, which are normally measured over a three year period.
Awards are normally made annually and, except in exceptional
circumstances, will not exceed three times salary for Executive
Directors and four times salary in the case of other eligible
employees. During 2010, conditional rights over
2,602,773 shares were awarded to employees under the plan.
The plan provides for the grant of nil cost options
to participants as an alternative to conditional share awards.
Executive
Share Option Plan
For options granted, the option price is not less than the
market value of an ordinary share, or the nominal value if
higher. The market value is the quoted price on the business day
preceding the date of grant, or the average of the middle market
quoted prices on the three consecutive dealing days immediately
preceding the date of grant. A performance condition has to be
met before options can be exercised. The performance condition
is set by the Remuneration Committee. The plan was not operated
during 2010 and no options were granted in the year under the
plan. The latest date that any options may be exercised is
April 4, 2015.
Options
and Ordinary Shares held by Directors
Details of the directors interests in the Companys
shares are set out on page 62 and pages F-46 to F-48.
57
BOARD
PRACTICES
Contracts
of Service
The Remuneration Committees policy is for Executive
Directors to have rolling contracts with a notice period of
12 months. All new appointments are intended to have
12-month
notice periods. However, on occasion, to complete an external
recruitment successfully, a longer initial notice period
reducing to 12 months may be used.
Andrew Cosslett, James Abrahamson, Kirk Kinsell and Richard
Solomons have service agreements with a notice period of
12 months.
David Websters appointment as Non-executive Chairman,
effective from January 1, 2004, is subject to six
months notice.
Non-executive director, Ralph Kugler signed a letter of
appointment effective from the listing of IHG in April 2003.
This was renewed, effective from completion of the capital
reorganization of the Company and the listing of new IHG shares
on June 27, 2005. David Kappler signed a letter of
appointment effective from his date of original appointment to
the Board on June 21, 2004. This was also renewed,
effective from June 27, 2005. Jennifer Laing and Jonathan
Linen signed letters of appointment effective from their
appointment dates, respectively August 25, 2005 and
December 1, 2005. Ying Yeh signed a letter of appointment
effective from her appointment date of December 1, 2007.
Graham Allan signed a letter of appointment effective from his
appointment date of January 1, 2010.
Directors
Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
effective
|
|
Unexpired term/
|
Directors
|
|
date
|
|
notice period
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
|
February 3, 2005
|
|
|
|
3 months
|
|
James Abrahamson
|
|
|
August 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
12 months
|
|
Kirk Kinsell
|
|
|
August 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
12 months
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
April 15, 2003
|
|
|
|
12 months
|
|
Each of Andrew Cosslett and Richard Solomons signed a letter of
appointment, effective from completion of the capital
reorganization of the Company and the listing of new IHG shares
on June 27, 2005. The terms of each appointment were as set
out in each executive directors original service agreement.
On March 16, 2011 the Company announced that Andrew
Cosslett will step down as Chief Executive on June 30,
2011, and will be succeeded by Richard Solomons.
Richard Solomons signed a contract on March 16, 2011
relating to his employment as Chief Executive, effective from
July 1, 2011.
See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for details of directors service contracts.
Payments
on Termination
No provisions for compensation for termination following change
of control, or for liquidated damages of any kind, are included
in the current directors contracts. In the event of any
early termination of an executive directors contract the
policy is to seek to minimize any liability.
Upon retirement, and under certain other specified circumstances
on termination of his employment, a director will become
eligible to receive benefit from his participation in a Company
pension plan. See Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for details of directors pension
entitlements at December 31, 2010.
Committees
Each Committee of the Board has written terms of reference which
are approved by the Board and which are subject to review each
year.
58
Executive
Committee
The Executive Committee is chaired by the Chief Executive. It
consists of the executive directors and the most senior
executives from the Group and usually meets monthly. Its role is
to consider and manage a range of important strategic and
business issues facing the Group. It is responsible for
monitoring the performance of the business. It is authorized to
approve capital and revenue investment within levels agreed by
the Board. It reviews and recommends to the Board the most
significant investment proposals.
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee is chaired by David Kappler who has
significant recent and relevant financial experience and is the
Committees financial expert. During 2010, the other
Committee members were Graham Allan, Ralph Kugler and
Jennifer Laing. All Audit Committee members are independent.
The Audit Committees principal responsibilities are to:
|
|
|
|
|
review the Groups public statements on internal control,
risk management and corporate governance compliance prior to
their consideration by the Board;
|
|
|
|
review the Groups processes for detecting and addressing
fraud, misconduct and control weaknesses and to consider the
response to any such occurrence, including overseeing the
process enabling the anonymous submission of concerns;
|
|
|
|
review reports from management, internal audit and external
audit concerning the effectiveness of internal control,
financial reporting and risk management processes;
|
|
|
|
review with management and the external auditor any financial
statements required under UK or US legislation before
submission to the Board;
|
|
|
|
establish, review and maintain the role and effectiveness of the
internal audit function, including overseeing the appointment of
the Head of Global Internal Audit;
|
|
|
|
assume responsibility for the appointment, compensation,
resignation, dismissal and the overseeing of the external
auditor, including review of the external audit, its cost and
effectiveness;
|
|
|
|
pre-approve non-audit work to be carried out by the external
auditor and the fees to be paid for that work, along with the
monitoring of the external auditors independence; and
|
|
|
|
oversee the Groups Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and
associated procedures for monitoring adherence.
|
The Audit Committee discharges its responsibilities through a
series of Committee meetings during the year at which detailed
reports are presented for review. The Audit Committee
commissions reports, either from external advisers, the Head of
Global Internal Audit, or Group management, after consideration
of the major risks to the Group or in response to developing
issues. The Chief Financial Officer attends its meetings as do
the external auditor and the Head of Global Internal Audit, both
of whom have the opportunity to meet privately with the Audit
Committee, in the absence of Group management, at the conclusion
of each meeting.
All proposals for the provision of non-audit services by the
external auditor are pre-approved by the Audit Committee or its
delegated member, the overriding consideration being to ensure
that the provision of non-audit services does not impact the
external auditors independence and objectivity.
Remuneration
Committee
The Remuneration Committee, chaired by Ralph Kugler, also
comprises the following Non-Executive, directors: David Kappler,
Jonathan Linen and Ying Yeh. The Remuneration Committee agrees,
on behalf of the Board, all aspects of the remuneration of the
Executive Directors and the Executive Committee members, and
agrees the strategy, direction and policy for the remuneration
of senior executives who have a significant influence over the
Companys ability to meet its strategic objectives.
Nomination
Committee
The Nomination Committee comprises the Chairman of the Board and
all the Non-Executive Directors. It is chaired by the Chairman
of the Board except when matters relating to this position are
to be discussed, in which case
59
it is chaired by an independent Non-Executive Director. The
Committee leads the process for Board appointments and nominates
candidates for approval by the Board. The balance of skills,
experience, independence and knowledge of Board members is
evaluated in order to define the requirements for a particular
appointment. The Committee generally engages external
consultants to advise on candidates for Board appointments and
appointments are made on merit, against objective criteria,
including ability to commit time, and with due regard for the
benefits of diversity, including gender. The Committee also has
responsibility for succession planning and assists in
identifying and developing the role of the Senior Independent
Director.
During 2010 the Committee discussed succession planning for both
the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors, considered
and recommended new Executive Director appointments, which have
now been implemented, and considered the appointment of an
additional Non-Executive Director.
Corporate
Responsibility Committee
The Corporate Responsibility Committee, chaired by Jennifer
Laing, was established in February 2009. The other Committee
member during 2010 was Ralph Kugler. Graham Allan joined the
Committee in January 2011. Meetings are regularly attended by
other members of the Board and Executive Committee. The
Corporate Responsibility Committee ensures that the Company has
in place the right policies, management and measurement systems
to enable it to deliver against its strategy.
Disclosure
Committee
The Disclosure Committee, chaired by the Groups Financial
Controller, and comprising the Company Secretary and other
senior executives, reports to the Chief Executive, the Chief
Financial Officer and to the Audit Committee. Its duties include
ensuring that information required to be disclosed in reports
pursuant to UK and US accounting, statutory or listing
requirements, fairly represents the Groups position in all
material respects.
General
Purposes Committee
The General Purposes Committee comprises any one Executive
Committee member together with a senior officer from an agreed
and restricted list of senior executives. It is always chaired
by an Executive Committee member. It attends to business of a
routine nature and to the administration of matters, the
principles of which have been agreed previously by the Board or
an appropriate Committee.
A description of the significant ways in which the
Companys actual corporate governance practices differ from
the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance requirements
followed by US companies can be found on page 82.
60
EMPLOYEES
The Group directly employed an average of 7,858 people worldwide
in the year ended December 31, 2010. Of these, 96% were
employed on a full-time basis and 4% were employed on a
part-time basis.
The table below analyzes the distribution of the average number
of employees for the last three fiscal periods by division and
by geographic region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Total
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,309
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
7,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,384
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
7,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The costs of the above employees are borne by the Group. In
addition, the Group employs 4,489 (2009 4,561, 2008 4,353)
people who work in managed hotels or directly on behalf of the
System Fund and whose costs of $282 million (2009
$267 million, 2008 $272 million) are borne by those
hotels or by the Fund.
Under EU law, many employees of Group companies are now covered
by the Working Time Regulations which came into force in the
United Kingdom on October 1, 1998. These regulations
implemented the European Working Time Directive and parts of the
Young Workers Directive, and lay down rights and protections for
employees in areas such as maximum working hours, minimum rest
time, minimum days off and paid leave.
In the United Kingdom there is in place a national minimum wage
under the National Minimum Wage Act. At December 31, 2010,
the minimum wage for individuals between 18 and under the age of
21 was £4.92 per hour and £5.93 per hour for
individuals age 21 and above. This particularly impacts
businesses in the hospitality and retailing sectors. Compliance
with the National Minimum Wage Act is being monitored by the Low
Pay Commission, an independent statutory body established by the
UK Government.
Less than 5% of the Groups UK employees are covered by
collective bargaining agreements with trade unions.
Continual attention is paid to the external market in order to
ensure that terms of employment are appropriate. The Group
believes the Group companies will be able to conduct their
relationships with trade unions and employees in a satisfactory
manner.
61
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
During 2010, conditional rights over 2,602,773 shares were
awarded to employees under the Long Term Incentive Plan. No
awards were granted under the Annual Bonus Plan or Executive
Share Option Plan. Details regarding the option pricing model
and assumptions used to determine the fair value of the awards
is included in Note 26 of Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
SHARE
OWNERSHIP
The interests of the directors and officers of the Group at
March 25, 2011 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
% of shares
|
|
|
of
1329/47
pence
|
|
outstanding(4)
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Abrahamson
|
|
|
146,759
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Graham Allan
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
|
622,718
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
David Kappler
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Kirk Kinsell
|
|
|
109,547
|
(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Ralph Kugler
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Jennifer Laing
|
|
|
3,998
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Jonathan Linen
|
|
|
7,343
|
(1)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
252,166
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
David Webster
|
|
|
34,905
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Ying Yeh
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Conophy
|
|
|
93,071
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Tracy Robbins
|
|
|
43,108
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Tom Seddon
|
|
|
54,678
|
(3)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
George Turner
|
|
|
35,182
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Held as American Depositary Shares
(ADSs).
|
|
(2)
|
|
637 of which are held as ADSs.
|
|
(3)
|
|
24,000 of which are held as ADSs.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Where no figure is given the
shareholding represents less than 0.1% of shares outstanding.
|
The above shareholdings are all beneficial interests. The
percentage of ordinary share capital owned by each of the
directors is negligible.
The directors interests as at December 31, 2010 in
options to subscribe for shares in InterContinental Hotels Group
PLC are set out on
page F-48.
The directors do not have different voting rights from other
shareholders of the Company.
The Company announced on March 16, 2011 that Andrew
Cosslett will step down as Chief Executive on June 30,
2011, and will be succeeded by Richard Solomons. A Director
since 2003 and currently Chief Financial Officer and Head of
Commercial Development, Richard Solomons will start in his new
position as Chief Executive on July 1, 2011.
62
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS
As far as is known to management, IHG is not directly or
indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or by any
government. As at the dates shown, the Company had been
notified, in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency
Rules of the UK Financial Services Authority, of the following
significant holdings of voting rights in its ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25, 2011
|
|
March 19, 2010
|
|
March 23, 2009
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Percent
|
|
Number of
|
|
Percent
|
|
Number of
|
|
Percent
|
Identity of person or group
|
|
shares/ADSs
|
|
of class
|
|
shares/ADSs
|
|
of class
|
|
shares/ADSs
|
|
of class
|
|
Ellerman Corporation Limited
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
29,921,742
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
%
|
|
|
29,921,742
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
%
|
Southeastern Asset Management, Inc.
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
14,860,671
|
|
|
|
5.16
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
FIL Limited (Fidelity International)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
14,687,743
|
|
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Cedar Rock Capital Limited
|
|
|
14,923,417
|
|
|
|
5.15
|
%
|
|
|
14,923,417
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
|
|
14,923,417
|
|
|
|
5.23
|
%
|
JP Morgan Asset Management Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
14,592,363
|
|
|
|
5.03
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Blackrock, Inc.
|
|
|
14,505,612
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
14,434,598
|
|
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Capital Research and Management Company
|
|
|
14,495,664
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Legal & General Group Plc
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
11,336,113
|
|
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
|
|
11,416,590
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Lloyds Banking Group plc
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
13,619,563
|
|
|
|
4.73
|
%
|
|
|
13,619,563
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
%
|
The Companys major shareholders do not have different
voting rights from other shareholders of the Company. The
Company does not know of any arrangements the operation of which
may result in a change in its control.
As of March 25, 2011, 15,035,669 ADSs equivalent to
15,035,669 ordinary shares, or approximately 5.18% of the total
ordinary shares in issue, were outstanding and were held by
1,024 holders. Since certain ordinary shares are registered in
the names of nominees, the number of shareholders of record may
not be representative of the number of beneficial owners.
As of March 25, 2011, there were a total of 54,074 record
holders of ordinary shares, of whom 353 had registered addresses
in the United States and held a total of 1,540,796 ordinary
shares (0.53% of the total issued).
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has not entered into any related party transactions
or loans for the period beginning January 1, 2010 up to
March 25, 2011.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Financial
Statements
See Item 18. Financial Statements.
Legal
Proceedings
Group companies have extensive operations in the United Kingdom,
as well as internationally, and are involved in a number of
legal and arbitration proceedings incidental to those
operations. It is the Companys view that such proceedings,
either individually or in the aggregate, have not in the recent
past and are not likely to have a significant effect on the
Groups financial position or profitability.
Notwithstanding the above, Holiday Hospitality Franchising,
Inc., a Group company, is defending a lawsuit filed by Hotel
Associates, Inc., a former franchisee, regarding an unfavorable
ruling on appeal on February 23, 2011. The final outcome is
not yet known, however, a litigation provision for
$22 million has been reflected in the
63
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended
December 31, 2010, further details of which are set out in
Note 1 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on
page F-13.
Dividends
See Item 3. Key information
Dividends.
SIGNIFICANT
CHANGES
Except as otherwise stated in this Form 20-F, there have been no
significant changes subsequent to December 31, 2010.
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
THE
OFFER AND LISTING
|
The principal trading market for the Companys ordinary
shares is the London Stock Exchange on which InterContinental
Hotels Group PLC shares are traded. The ordinary shares are also
listed on the New York Stock Exchange trading in the form of
ADSs evidenced by ADRs. Each ADS represents one ordinary share.
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC has a sponsored ADR facility
with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Depositary.
The following tables show, for the fiscal periods indicated, the
reported high and low middle market quotations (which represent
an average of closing bid and ask prices) for the ordinary
shares on the London Stock Exchange, as derived from the Daily
Official List of the UK Listing Authority, and the highest and
lowest sales prices of the ADSs as reported on the New York
Stock Exchange composite tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£ per
|
|
|
|
|
ordinary share
|
|
$ per ADS
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2006
|
|
|
12.65
|
|
|
|
8.07
|
|
|
|
26.27
|
|
|
|
14.40
|
|
2007
|
|
|
14.20
|
|
|
|
8.73
|
|
|
|
32.59
|
|
|
|
17.37
|
|
2008
|
|
|
8.84
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
|
|
|
17.40
|
|
|
|
6.52
|
|
2009
|
|
|
9.04
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
|
|
14.67
|
|
|
|
6.04
|
|
2010
|
|
|
12.66
|
|
|
|
8.87
|
|
|
|
20.04
|
|
|
|
13.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£ per
|
|
|
|
|
ordinary share
|
|
$ per ADS
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
6.22
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
|
|
9.33
|
|
|
|
6.04
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
11.19
|
|
|
|
8.20
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
8.27
|
|
|
|
5.92
|
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
9.57
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
9.04
|
|
|
|
7.64
|
|
|
|
14.67
|
|
|
|
12.26
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
|
|
8.87
|
|
|
|
15.71
|
|
|
|
13.84
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
12.24
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
|
|
18.34
|
|
|
|
14.86
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
11.99
|
|
|
|
9.82
|
|
|
|
18.49
|
|
|
|
15.24
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
12.66
|
|
|
|
10.81
|
|
|
|
20.04
|
|
|
|
17.20
|
|
2011 First quarter (through March 25, 2011)
|
|
|
14.35
|
|
|
|
12.28
|
|
|
|
23.28
|
|
|
|
19.60
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£ per
|
|
|
|
|
ordinary share
|
|
$ per ADS
|
Month ended
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
September 2010
|
|
|
11.50
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
|
|
18.17
|
|
|
|
16.16
|
|
October 2010
|
|
|
12.25
|
|
|
|
11.27
|
|
|
|
19.35
|
|
|
|
17.89
|
|
November 2010
|
|
|
12.22
|
|
|
|
10.81
|
|
|
|
20.04
|
|
|
|
17.20
|
|
December 2010
|
|
|
12.66
|
|
|
|
11.55
|
|
|
|
19.73
|
|
|
|
18.29
|
|
January 2011
|
|
|
13.53
|
|
|
|
12.43
|
|
|
|
21.86
|
|
|
|
19.73
|
|
February 2011
|
|
|
14.35
|
|
|
|
13.03
|
|
|
|
23.28
|
|
|
|
21.35
|
|
March 2011 (through to March 25, 2011)
|
|
|
13.39
|
|
|
|
12.28
|
|
|
|
22.03
|
|
|
|
19.60
|
|
Fluctuations in the exchange rates between pounds sterling and
the US dollar will affect the dollar equivalent of the pounds
sterling price of the ordinary shares on the London Stock
Exchange and, as a result, are likely to affect the market price
of ADSs.
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
Not applicable.
SELLING
SHAREHOLDERS
Not applicable.
DILUTION
Not applicable.
EXPENSES
OF THE ISSUE
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
|
ARTICLES OF
ASSOCIATION
The Companys articles of association were adopted at the
Annual General Meeting held on May 28, 2010.
The following summarizes material rights of holders of the
Companys ordinary shares under the material provisions of
the Companys articles of association and English law. This
summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
Companies Act and the Companys articles of association.
The Companys articles of association are filed as an
exhibit to this 20-F.
The Companys shares may be held in certificated or
uncertificated form. No holder of the Companys shares will
be required to make additional contributions of capital in
respect of the Companys shares in the future.
In the following description, a shareholder is the
person registered in the Companys register of members as
the holder of the relevant share.
Principal
Objects
The Company is incorporated under the name InterContinental
Hotels Group PLC and is registered in England and Wales with
registered number 5134420. The Companys articles of
association do not restrict its objects.
Directors
Under the Companys articles of association, a director may
not vote in respect of any proposal in which he, or any person
connected with him, has any material interest other than by
virtue of his interests in securities of, or otherwise in or
through, the Company. This is subject to certain exceptions
relating to proposals (a) indemnifying
65
him in respect of obligations incurred on behalf of the Company,
(b) indemnifying a third party in respect of obligations of
the Company for which the director has assumed responsibility
under an indemnity or guarantee, (c) relating to an offer
of securities in which he will be interested as an underwriter,
(d) concerning another body corporate in which the director
is beneficially interested in less than one percent of the
issued shares of any class of shares of such a body corporate,
(e) relating to an employee benefit in which the director
will share equally with other employees and (f) relating to
liability insurance that the Company is empowered to purchase
for the benefit of directors of the Company in respect of
actions undertaken as directors (or officers) of the Company.
The directors are empowered to exercise all the powers of the
Company to borrow money, subject to the limitation that the
aggregate amount of all moneys borrowed by the Company and its
subsidiaries shall not exceed an amount equal to three times the
Companys share capital and consolidated reserves, unless
sanctioned by an ordinary resolution of the Company.
Directors are not required to hold any shares of the Company by
way of qualification.
Rights
Attaching to Shares
Under English law, dividends are payable on the Companys
ordinary shares only out of profits available for distribution,
as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United Kingdom and by the Companies Act. Holders
of the Companys ordinary shares are entitled to receive
such dividends as may be declared by the shareholders in general
meeting, rateably according to the amounts paid up on such
shares, provided that the dividend cannot exceed the amount
recommended by the directors.
The Companys Board of directors may pay shareholders such
interim dividends as appear to them to be justified by the
Companys financial position. If authorized by an ordinary
resolution of the shareholders, the Board of directors may also
direct payment of a dividend in whole or in part by the
distribution of specific assets (and in particular of paid up
shares or debentures of any other company).
Any dividend unclaimed after six years from the date the
dividend was declared, or became due for payment, will be
forfeited and will revert to the Company.
Voting
Rights
Voting at any general meeting of shareholders is by a show of
hands unless a poll, which is a written vote, is duly demanded.
On a show of hands, every shareholder who is present in person
or by proxy at a general meeting has one vote regardless of the
number of shares held. On a poll, every shareholder who is
present in person or by proxy has one vote for every
1329/47
pence in nominal amount of the shares held by that shareholder.
A poll may be demanded by any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the chairman of the meeting;
|
|
|
|
at least five shareholders present in person or by proxy and
entitled to vote at the meeting;
|
|
|
|
any shareholder or shareholders representing in the aggregate
not less than one-tenth of the total voting rights of all
shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting; or
|
|
|
|
any shareholder or shareholders holding shares conferring a
right to vote at the meeting on which there have been
paid-up sums
in the aggregate equal to not less than one-tenth of the total
sum paid up on all the shares conferring that right.
|
A proxy form will be treated as giving the proxy the authority
to demand a poll, or to join others in demanding one.
The necessary quorum for a general meeting is three persons
carrying a right to vote upon the business to be transacted,
whether present in person or by proxy.
66
Matters are transacted at general meetings of the Company by the
proposing and passing of resolutions, of which there are two
kinds:
|
|
|
|
|
an ordinary resolution, which includes resolutions for the
election of directors, the approval of financial statements, the
cumulative annual payment of dividends, the appointment of
auditors, the increase of authorized share capital or the grant
of authority to allot shares; and
|
|
|
|
a special resolution, which includes resolutions amending the
Companys articles of association, disapplying statutory
pre-emption rights, modifying the rights of any class of the
Companys shares at a meeting of the holders of such class
or relating to certain matters concerning the Companys
winding up or changing the Companys name.
|
An ordinary resolution requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes of those persons voting at a meeting at
which there is a quorum.
Special resolutions require the affirmative vote of not less
than three-fourths of the persons voting at a meeting at which
there is a quorum.
Annual General Meetings must be convened upon advance written
notice of 21 days. Other meetings must be convened upon
advance written notice of 14 days. The days of delivery or
receipt of the notice are not included. The notice must specify
the nature of the business to be transacted. The Board of
directors may if they choose make arrangements for shareholders
who are unable to attend the place of the meeting to participate
at other places.
The articles of association specify that each Director shall
retire every three years at the Annual General Meeting and
unless otherwise decided by the Directors, shall be eligible for
re-election. However, the new UK Corporate Governance Code
recommends that all Directors of FTSE 350 companies submit
themselves for election or re-election (as appropriate) by
shareholders every year. Although IHG is not obliged to follow
this recommendation until its Annual General Meeting in 2012,
the Board has decided to submit the appointment of all its
Directors for shareholder approval in 2011. Therefore, all
Directors will retire and offer themselves for election or
re-election at the next Annual General Meeting.
Variation
of Rights
If, at any time, the Companys share capital is divided
into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any
class may be varied, subject to the provisions of the Companies
Act, with the consent in writing of holders of three-fourths in
nominal value of the issued shares of that class or upon the
adoption of a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of
the holders of the shares of that class. At every such separate
meeting, all of the provisions of the articles of association
relating to proceedings at a general meeting apply, except that
the quorum is to be the number of persons (which must be two or
more) who hold or represent by proxy not less than one-third in
nominal value of the issued shares of the class.
Rights
in a
Winding-up
Except as the Companys shareholders have agreed or may
otherwise agree, upon the Companys winding up, the balance
of assets available for distribution:
|
|
|
|
|
after the payment of all creditors including certain
preferential creditors, whether statutorily preferred creditors
or normal creditors; and
|
|
|
|
subject to any special rights attaching to any class of shares;
|
is to be distributed among the holders of ordinary shares
according to the amounts
paid-up on
the shares held by them. This distribution is generally to be
made in cash. A liquidator may, however, upon the adoption of an
extraordinary resolution of the shareholders, divide among the
shareholders the whole or any part of the Companys assets
in kind.
67
Limitations
on Voting and Shareholding
There are no limitations imposed by English law or the
Companys articles of association on the right of
non-residents or foreign persons to hold or vote the
Companys ordinary shares or ADSs, other than the
limitations that would generally apply to all of the
Companys shareholders.
MATERIAL
CONTRACTS
The following contracts have been entered into otherwise than in
the course of ordinary business by members of the Group either
(i) in the two years immediately preceding the date of this
document in the case of contracts which are or may be material
or (ii) which contain provisions under which any Group
member has any obligation or entitlement which is material to
the Group as at the date of this document. To the extent that
these agreements include representations, warranties and
indemnities, such provisions are considered standard in an
agreement of that nature, save to the extent identified below.
£750,000,000
Euro Medium Term Note Program
1. On November 27, 2009, a trust deed (the
Trust Deed) was executed by InterContinental
Hotels Group PLC as issuer (the Issuer), Six
Continents Limited and InterContinental Hotels Limited as
guarantors (the Guarantors) and HSBC Corporate
Trustee Company (UK) Limited as trustee (the
Trustee), in accordance with which the Issuer
established a Euro medium term note program (the
Program) pursuant to which the Issuer may issue
notes (Notes) unconditionally and irrevocably
guaranteed by the Guarantors, up to a maximum nominal amount
from time to time outstanding of £750,000,000 (or its
equivalent in other currencies).
Notes are to be issued in series (each a Series) in
bearer form. Each Series may comprise one or more tranches (each
a Tranche) issued on different issue dates. Notes
may be issued either (1) pursuant to the Base Prospectus
dated November 27, 2009 (the Base Prospectus)
as amended
and/or
supplemented by a document setting out the final terms (the
Final Terms) of the Notes or (2) pursuant to a
separate prospectus specific to such Tranche (the Drawdown
Prospectus). The terms and conditions applicable to any
particular Tranche of Notes will be the Terms and Conditions of
the Notes as supplemented, amended
and/or
replaced to the extent described in the relevant Final Terms or,
as the case may be, the relevant Drawdown Prospectus.
Under the Trust Deed, each of the Issuer and the Guarantors
has given certain customary covenants in favor of the Trustee.
Final Terms were issued on December 9, 2009 in respect of
the issue of a Tranche of £250,000,000 6 per cent
Notes due December 9, 2016. These Final Terms stipulate
that the holders of the Notes have the right to repayment if the
Notes (a) become non-investment grade within the period
commencing on the date of announcement of a change of control
and ending 90 days after the change of control (the
Change of Control Period) and are not subsequently,
within the Change of Control Period, reinstated to investment
grade; (b) are downgraded from a non-investment grade and
are not reinstated to its earlier credit rating or better within
the Change of Control Period; or (c) are not credit rated
and do not become investment-grade credit rated by the end of
the Change of Control Period. Further details of the Program and
the Notes are set out in the Base Prospectus, a copy of which is
available (as is a copy of Final Terms dated December 7,
2009) on the Companys website at www.ihgplc.com.
These Notes are referred to as £250 million 6%
bonds in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. On November 27, 2009, the Issuer and the Guarantors
entered into an agency agreement (the Agency
Agreement) with HSBC Bank PLC as principal paying agent
and the Trustee, pursuant to which the Issuer and the Guarantors
appointed paying agents and calculation agents in connection
with the Program and the Notes.
Under the Agency Agreement, each of the Issuer and the
Guarantors has given a customary indemnity in favor of the
paying agents and the calculation agents.
3. On November 27, 2009, the Issuer and the Guarantors
entered into a dealer agreement (the Dealer
Agreement) with Barclays Bank PLC, HSBC Bank PLC and The
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC as arrangers (the
Arrangers) and Barclays Bank PLC, HSBC Bank PLC,
Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, Merrill Lynch International,
68
Société Générale and The Royal Bank of
Scotland PLC as dealers (the Dealers), pursuant to
which the Dealers were appointed in connection with the Program
and the Notes.
Under the Dealer Agreement, each of the Issuer and the
Guarantors has given customary warranties and indemnities in
favor of the Dealers.
Syndicated
Facility
On May 2, 2008, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC signed
the Syndicated Facility, which comprises a five year
$2,100 million bank facility agreement with Bank of America
N.A., The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Barclays Capital,
HSBC Bank plc, Lloyds TSB Bank plc, The Royal Bank of Scotland
plc, Société Générale Corporate &
Investment Banking and WestLB AG, London Branch, all acting as
mandated lead arrangers and underwriters and HSBC Bank plc as
agent bank.
The facility was split into a $1.6 billion five year
revolving credit facility and a $500 million 30 month
term loan facility. The term loan reduced to $85 million in
December 2009 following repayment of $415 million. The
outstanding sum of $85 million was repaid in full in
September 2010.
The interest margin payable on borrowings under the Syndicated
Facility is linked to IHGs consolidated net debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio. The margin can vary between LIBOR +
0.475% and LIBOR + 1.05% depending on the level of the ratio.
Disposal
to Hospitality Properties Trust (HPT)
On December 17, 2004, BHR Texas L.P., InterContinental
Hotels Group Resources, Inc., Crowne Plaza LAX, LLC, Crowne
Plaza Hilton Head Holding Company, Holiday Pacific Partners
Limited Partnership, 220 Bloor Street Hotel Inc. and Staybridge
Markham, Inc. (together, the Vendors) entered into a
Purchase and Sale Agreement (as amended and restated on
February 9, 2005) with HPT IHG 2
Properties Trust (HPT IHG-2), pursuant to which HPT
IHG-2 purchased from the Vendors 12 hotels situated in the
United States and Canada. On the same date, Six Continents
International Holdings B.V. (SIH), entered into a
Stock Purchase Agreement (as amended and restated on
February 9, 2005) with HPT IHG-2, pursuant to which
HPT IHG-2 purchased from SIH all of the shares in Crowne Plaza
(Puerto Rico) Inc., which is the owner of a hotel in Puerto
Rico. The total consideration payable by HPT IHG-2 for the sales
amounted to $425 million, before transaction costs,
equivalent to net book value (of which $395 million was
received upon the main completion of the sale on
February 16, 2005, with the remaining $30 million
received upon the completion of the sale of the InterContinental
Hotel in Austin, on June 1, 2005). The Group continues to
manage the hotels.
Under the Purchase and Sale Agreement and Stock Purchase
Agreement, the Vendors have given certain customary warranties
and indemnities to HPT IHG-2.
In connection with the disposals referred to above and as part
of both prior and subsequent transactions with HPT in relation
to managed hotels, the Group agreed to guarantee certain amounts
payable to HPT TRS IHG-1, HPT TRS IHG-2 and HPT TRS IHG-3 (being
subsidiaries of the HPT group). The guarantee is for a maximum
amount of $125 million, of which $118 million had been
utilized at December 31, 2010, and requires amounts to be
paid by IHG to HPT TRS IHG-1, HPT TRS IHG-2 and HPT TRS IHG-3
irrespective of the revenue generated by the relevant hotels.
The guarantee may be terminated if certain financial tests are
met. In addition to the guarantee, the Group paid a deposit to
HPT in three transactions between July 2003 and December 2006 in
the aggregate amount of $37 million which may be used by
HPT to supplement any shortfall between the amounts required to
be paid and the amounts actually paid by the Group to HPT (or
its affiliates) if the maximum amount of the guarantee has been
met.
UK
Hotels Disposal
A Share Purchase Agreement (the SPA) was entered
into on March 10, 2005 between Six Continents,
IHC London (Holdings) Limited (IHC Holdings)
and LRG. Pursuant to the SPA, Six Continents and
IHC Holdings (the Sellers) agreed to sell all
of the issued ordinary share capital of Six Continents
Hotels & Holidays Limited, Holiday Inn Limited, NAS
Cobalt No. 2 Limited and London Forum Hotel Limited
respectively (together, the LRG Shares) to LRG and
to transfer to LRG certain contractual rights to the extent they
related to
69
the hotels LRG indirectly acquired under the SPA (the LRG
Hotels) and which remained to be completed or performed,
or remained in force, after completion of the sale of the LRG
Shares to LRG.
The agreed sale price for the LRG Shares was
£1 billion. Proceeds of £40 million were
deferred and were contingent upon certain pre-agreed performance
targets being reached. Following completion, the Group continues
to manage the LRG Hotels.
Under the SPA, the Sellers gave certain warranties in relation
to the assets disposed of and LRG gave certain warranties in
relation to its authority to enter into the SPA and its capacity
to perform its obligations under the SPA. Certain indemnities
were also given by the Sellers.
Australasian
Hotels Disposals
On September 1, 2005, Holiday Inn Holdings (Australia) Pty
Limited, SPHC Group Pty Limited and HIA(T) Pty Limited (for the
Australian assets) and Hale International Limited (for the New
Zealand asset), all three of which are members of the Group,
(IHG) entered into two sale and purchase agreements
with HANZ (Australia) Pty Limited (for the Australian assets)
and HANZ Holdings (New Zealand) Limited (for the New Zealand
asset), both companies being subsidiaries of the Hotel
Alternative (Australia and New Zealand) Private Syndicate
managed by Eureka Funds Management Limited (Eureka)
pursuant to which Eureka purchased from IHG nine hotels situated
in Australia and New Zealand for AUS$390 million in cash (before
transaction costs) which is AUS$75 million above the net
book value of AUS$315 million. IHG gave to Eureka normal
warranties in relation to the hotels and an indemnity for
pre-completion tax liabilities. The transaction completed on
October 31, 2005.
The Group continues to manage the hotels for Eureka under ten
year management contracts entered into at the time of the
transaction, with an option to extend for ten further years at
the Groups discretion.
Britvic
Underwriting Agreement
An Underwriting Agreement was entered into on November 25,
2005 between, inter alia, Britvic, IHG in its capacity as a
selling shareholder, the directors of Britvic, Citigroup and
Deutsche Bank AG (as joint sponsors) and Citigroup, Deutsche
Bank AG, Lehman Brothers International (Europe) and Merrill
Lynch International (as joint Underwriters). This set out the
mechanics for the Britvic initial public offering and included
customary termination rights. Britvic gave customary warranties,
indemnities and undertakings in the context of an agreement of
this sort. IHG also gave customary warranties and indemnities in
its capacity as a selling shareholder. Under this agreement,
each of the selling shareholders paid a commission equal to 2%
of the offer price multiplied by the number of shares sold by
that selling shareholder to the joint Underwriters.
Disposal
to Westbridge
On March 10, 2006 a Sale and Purchase Agreement
(SPA) was entered into between BHR Luxembourg
S.a.r.l. and other wholly owned subsidiaries of IHG as sellers
(BHR Luxembourg S.a.r.l. being the principal seller) and
Cooperatie Westbridge Europe I U.A. as purchaser and Westbridge
Hospitality Fund L.P. as the purchasers guarantor.
Under the SPA the sellers agreed to sell 23 hotels situated
across Europe in France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands,
Austria, Italy and Spain.
The agreed sale price was 352 million. IHGs
share of the proceeds was 345.2 million (before
transaction costs), in cash and the assumption of debt, and the
balance of 6.8 million relates to third-party
minority interests.
The hotels continue to be operated by the purchaser under the
same brands under 15 year franchise agreements.
Under the SPA the sellers gave certain customary warranties and
indemnities to the purchaser.
Disposal
to Morgan Stanley Real Estate Funds
On July 13, 2006 a sale and purchase agreement
(SPA) was entered into between BHR Holdings BV and
other wholly owned subsidiaries of IHG as sellers (BHR Holdings
BV being the principal seller) and a subsidiary of Morgan
Stanley Real Estate Funds MSREF VI Danube BV. Under the SPA the
sellers agreed to sell seven
70
InterContinental branded hotels situated across Europe in
France, Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Hungary, Italy and
Spain.
The agreed sale price for the seven hotels was
634 million. The Group retained 30 year
management contracts on the hotels, with two ten year renewals
at the Groups discretion, giving a total potential
contract length of 50 years.
Under the SPA the sellers gave certain customary warranties and
indemnities to the purchaser.
EXCHANGE
CONTROLS
There are no restrictions on dividend payments to US citizens.
Although there are currently no UK foreign exchange control
restrictions on the export or import of the capital or the
payment of dividends on the ordinary shares or the ADSs, from
time to time English law imposes restrictions on the payment of
dividends to persons resident (or treated as so resident) in or
governments of (or persons exercising public functions in)
certain countries (each of the foregoing, a Prohibited
Person).
There are no restrictions under the articles of association or
under English law that limit the right of non-resident or
foreign owners to hold or vote the ordinary shares. However,
under current English law, ordinary shares or ADSs may not be
owned by a Prohibited Person. In addition, the Companys
articles of association contain certain limitations on the
voting and other rights of any holder of ordinary shares, whose
holding may, in the opinion of the directors, result in the loss
or failure to secure the reinstatement of any license or
franchise from any US governmental agency held by Six
Continents Hotels Inc or any subsidiary thereof.
TAXATION
This section provides a summary of the material US federal
income tax and UK tax consequences to US holders, as
defined below, of owning and disposing of ordinary shares or
ADSs of the Company. This section addresses only the tax
position of a US holder who holds ordinary shares or ADSs as
capital assets. This section does not, however, discuss the tax
consequences of members of special classes of holders subject to
special rules, such as
|
|
|
|
|
certain financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
dealers and traders in securities or foreign currencies;
|
|
|
|
persons holding ordinary shares or ADSs as part of a hedge,
straddle, conversion transaction, integrated transaction or
similar transaction;
|
|
|
|
persons whose functional currency for US federal income tax
purposes is not the US dollar;
|
|
|
|
partnerships or other entities classified as partnerships for US
federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
persons liable for the alternative minimum tax;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
|
persons who acquired our ADSs or ordinary shares pursuant to the
exercise of any employee stock option or otherwise as
compensation;
|
|
|
|
holders that, directly or indirectly, hold 10% or more of the
Companys voting stock.
|
This section does not generally deal with the position of a US
holder who is resident or ordinarily resident in the United
Kingdom for UK tax purposes or who is subject to UK taxation on
capital gains or income by virtue of carrying on a trade,
profession or vocation in the United Kingdom through a branch,
agency or permanent establishment and such ADSs or ordinary
shares are or have been used, held or acquired for the purposes
of such trade, profession or vocation.
A US holder is a beneficial owner of ordinary shares or ADSs who
is for US federal income tax purposes (i) an individual
citizen or resident of the US, (ii) a US domestic
corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation,
71
created or organized in or under the laws of the United States
or any political subdivision thereof; (iii) an estate whose
income is subject to US federal income tax regardless of its
source, or (iv) a trust if a US court can exercise primary
supervision over the trusts administration and one or more
United States persons are authorized to control all substantial
decisions of the trust.
This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed
regulations, published rulings and court decisions, and on UK
tax laws and published practice of the UK HM Revenue and
Customs, all as of the date hereof. These laws are subject to
change, possibly on a retroactive basis.
This section is further based in part upon the representations
of the Depositary and assumes that each obligation in the
deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in
accordance with its terms. For US federal income tax purposes,
an owner of ADRs evidencing ADSs will generally be treated as
the owner of the underlying shares represented by those ADSs.
Generally, exchanges of ordinary shares for ADRs, and ADRs for
ordinary shares, will not be subject to US federal income tax or
UK taxation on capital gains.
The US Treasury has expressed concerns that parties to whom ADRs
are pre-released may be taking actions that are inconsistent
with the claiming of foreign tax credits for US holders of ADRs.
Such actions would also be inconsistent with the claiming of the
reduced rate of tax, described below, for qualified dividend
income. Accordingly, the analysis of the availability of the
reduced rate of tax for qualified dividend income described
below could be affected by actions taken by parties to whom the
ADRs are pre-released.
Investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding the
US federal, state and local, the UK and other tax consequences
of owning and disposing of shares and ADSs in their particular
circumstances.
Taxation
of Dividends
United
Kingdom Taxation
Under current UK tax law, the Company will not be required to
withhold tax at source from dividend payments it makes.
A US holder who is not resident or ordinarily resident for
United Kingdom tax purposes in the United Kingdom will generally
not be liable for UK taxation on dividends received in respect
of the ADSs or ordinary shares.
United
States Federal Income Taxation
Subject to the passive foreign investment company
(PFIC) rules discussed below, a US holder is subject
to US federal income taxation on the gross amount of any
dividend paid by the Company out of its current or accumulated
earnings and profits (as determined for US federal income tax
purposes). Distributions in excess of the Companys current
and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for US
federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a return of
capital to the extent of the US holders basis in the
shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain. Because the
Company has not historically maintained, and does not currently
maintain, books in accordance with US tax principles, the
Company does not expect to be in a position to determine whether
any distribution will be in excess of the Companys current
and accumulated earnings and profits as computed for US federal
income tax purposes. As a result, the Company expects that
amounts distributed will be reported to the Internal Revenue
Service as dividends.
Subject to applicable limitations and the discussion above
regarding concerns expressed by the US Treasury, dividends paid
to a non-corporate US holder in taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2013 that constitute qualified dividend income
will be taxable to the holder at a maximum tax rate of 15%. The
Company expects that dividends paid by the Company with respect
to the shares or ADSs will constitute qualified dividend income.
U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors to
determine whether they are subject to any special rules that
limit their ability to be taxed at this favorable rate.
Dividends must be included in income when the US holder, in the
case of shares, or the Depositary, in the case of ADSs, actually
or constructively receives the dividend, and will not be
eligible for the dividends-received
72
deduction generally allowed to US corporations in respect
of dividends received from other US corporations. For
foreign tax credit limitation purposes, dividends will generally
be income from sources outside the United States.
The amount of any dividend paid in pounds will be the US dollar
value of the pound sterling payments made, determined at the
spot pound sterling/US dollar rate on the date the dividend
distribution is includible in income, regardless of whether the
payment is in fact converted into US dollars. If the dividend is
converted into US dollars on the date of receipt, a US holder
should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or
loss in respect of the dividend income. Generally, any gain or
loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the
period from the date the dividend payment is includible in
income to the date the payment is converted into US dollars will
be treated as ordinary income or loss and, for foreign tax
credit limitation purposes, from sources within the
United States.
Taxation
of Capital Gains
United
Kingdom Taxation
A US holder who is not resident or ordinarily resident for UK
tax purposes in the United Kingdom will not generally be liable
for UK taxation on capital gains realized or accrued on the sale
or other disposal of ADSs or ordinary shares.
A US holder of ADSs or ordinary shares who is an individual and
who, broadly, has temporarily ceased to be resident or
ordinarily resident in the UK or has become temporarily treated
as non-resident for UK tax purposes for a period of less than
five years of assessment and who disposes of ordinary shares or
ADSs during that period may, for the year of assessment when
that individual becomes resident again in the UK, also be liable
to UK tax on capital gains (subject to any available exemption
or relief), notwithstanding the fact that such US holder was not
resident or ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom at the
time of the sale or other disposal.
United
States Federal Income Taxation
Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, a US holder that
sells or otherwise disposes of ordinary shares or ADSs will
recognize a capital gain or loss for US federal income tax
purposes equal to the difference between the US dollar value of
the amount realized and its tax basis, determined in US dollars,
in the ordinary shares or ADSs. Such capital gain or loss will
be long-term capital gain or loss where the holder has a holding
period greater than one year. The gain or loss will generally be
income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign
tax credit limitation purposes. The deductibility of losses is
subject to limitations.
PFIC
Rules
The Company believes that it was not a PFIC for US federal
income tax purposes for its 2010 taxable year. However, this
conclusion is an annual factual determination and thus may be
subject to change. If the Company were to be treated as a PFIC,
gain realized on the sale or other disposition of ordinary
shares or ADSs would in general not be treated as capital gain.
Instead, gain would be treated as if the US holder had realized
such gain ratably over the holding period for the ordinary
shares or ADSs and, to the extent allocated to the taxable year
of the sale or other exchange and to any year before the Company
became a PFIC, would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount
allocated to each other taxable year would be taxed at the
highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain
was allocated, together with an interest charge in respect of
the tax attributable to each such year. In addition, similar
rules would apply to any excess distribution
received on the ordinary shares or ADSs (generally, the excess
of any distribution received on the ordinary shares or ADSs
during the taxable year over 125% of the average amount of
distributions received during a specified prior period), and the
preferential rate for qualified dividend income
received by certain non-corporate US holders would not apply.
Certain elections may be available (including a
market-to-market
election) to US holders that would result in alternative
treatments of the ordinary shares or ADSs. Pursuant to
legislation enacted in 2010, if the Company were to be treated
as a PFIC in any taxable year, a US holder may be required
to file an annual report with the Internal Revenue Service
containing such information as the Treasury Department may
require.
73
Additional
Tax Considerations
United
States Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
Payments of dividends and other proceeds with respect to ADSs
and ordinary shares may be reported to the IRS and to the US
holder. Backup withholding may apply to these payments if the US
holder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification
number or certification of exempt status or fails to report all
interest and dividends required to be shown on its US federal
income tax returns. Certain US holders (including, among others,
corporations) are not subject to backup withholding. US holders
should consult their tax advisors as to their qualification for
exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for
obtaining an exemption.
United
Kingdom Inheritance Tax
An individual who is neither domiciled nor deemed domiciled in
the UK (under certain UK rules relating to previous domicile or
long residence) is only chargeable to UK inheritance tax to the
extent the individual owns assets situated in the UK. As a
matter of UK law, it is not clear whether the situs of an ADS
for UK inheritance tax purposes is determined by the place where
the depositary is established and records the entitlements of
the depositholders, or by the situs of the underlying share
which the ADS represents.
However, an individual who is domiciled in the United States
(for the purposes of the Estate and Gift Tax Convention) and is
not a UK national as defined in the Convention will not be
subject to UK inheritance tax (to the extent UK inheritance tax
applies) in respect of ADSs on the individuals death or on
a transfer of the ADSs during their lifetime, provided that any
applicable US federal gift or estate tax is paid, unless the
ADSs are part of the business property of a UK permanent
establishment or pertain to a UK fixed base of an individual
used for the performance of independent personal services. Where
the ADSs have been placed in trust by a settlor, they may be
subject to UK inheritance tax unless, when the trust was
created, the settlor was domiciled in the United States and was
not a UK national. Where ADSs are subject to both UK
inheritance tax and to US federal gift or estate tax, the Estate
and Gift Tax Convention generally provides for either a credit
against US federal tax liabilities for UK inheritance tax
paid or for a credit against UK inheritance tax liabilities for
US federal tax paid, as the case may be.
United
Kingdom Stamp Duty and Stamp Duty Reserve Tax
(SDRT)
The transfer of ordinary shares will generally be liable to
stamp duty at the rate of 0.5% of the amount or value of the
consideration given (rounded up to the nearest £5). An
unconditional agreement to transfer ordinary shares will
generally be subject to SDRT at 0.5% of the agreed
consideration. However, if within the period of six years of the
date of such agreement becoming unconditional an instrument of
transfer is executed pursuant to the agreement and duly stamped,
any liability to SDRT will usually be repaid, if already paid,
or canceled. The liability to pay stamp duty or SDRT is
generally satisfied by the purchaser or transferee.
No stamp duty or SDRT will generally arise on a transfer of
ordinary shares into CREST, unless such transfer is made for a
consideration in money or moneys worth, in which case a
liability to SDRT will arise, usually at the rate of 0.5% of the
value of the consideration.
A transfer of ordinary shares effected on a paperless basis
within CREST will generally be subject to SDRT at the rate of
0.5% of the value of the consideration.
Stamp duty, or SDRT, may be payable upon the transfer or issue
of ordinary shares to, or to a nominee or, in some cases, agent
of, a person whose business is or includes issuing depositary
receipts or the provision of clearance services. For these
purposes, the current rate of stamp duty and SDRT is usually
1.5% (rounded up, in the case of stamp duty, to the nearest
£5). The rate is applied, in each case, to the amount or
value of the consideration or, in some circumstances, to the
value or the issue price of the ordinary shares. In accordance
with the terms of the deposit agreement, any tax or duty payable
on deposits of ordinary shares by the depositary or by the
custodian of the depositary will be charged to the party to whom
ADSs are delivered against such deposits.
Provided that the instrument of transfer is not executed in the
United Kingdom and remains at all subsequent times outside the
United Kingdom, no stamp duty should be payable on the transfer
of ADSs. An agreement to transfer ADSs in the form of depositary
receipts will not give rise to a liability to SDRT.
74
DOCUMENTS
ON DISPLAY
It is possible to read and copy documents referred to in this
Annual Report on
Form 20-F
that have been filed with the SEC at the SECs public
reference room located at 100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference rooms and their
copy charges. The Companys SEC filings since May 22,
2002 are also publicly available through the SECs website
located at www.sec.gov.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Exchange
and Interest Rate Risk, and Financial Instruments
The Groups treasury policy is to manage financial risks
that arise in relation to underlying business needs. The
activities of the treasury function are carried out in
accordance with Board approved policies and are subject to
regular internal audit. The treasury function does not operate
as a profit center.
Treasury
Risk Management
The treasury function seeks to reduce the financial risk of the
Group and manages liquidity to meet all foreseeable cash needs.
Treasury activities include money market investments, spot and
forward foreign exchange instruments, currency options, currency
swaps, interest rate swaps and options and forward rate
agreements. One of the primary objectives of the Groups
treasury risk management policy is to mitigate the adverse
impact of movements in interest rates and foreign exchange rates.
Credit
Risk
Credit risk on treasury transactions is minimized by operating a
policy on the investment of surplus cash that generally
restricts counterparties to those with an A credit rating or
better or those providing adequate security.
Notwithstanding that counterparties must have an A credit rating
or better, during periods of significant financial market
turmoil, counterparty exposure limits are significantly reduced
and counterparty credit exposure reviews are broadened to
include the relative placing of credit default swap pricings.
The Group trades only with recognized, creditworthy third
parties. It is the Groups policy that all customers who
wish to trade on credit terms are subject to credit verification
procedures.
In respect of credit risk arising from financial assets, the
Groups exposure to credit risk arises from default of the
counterparty, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying
amount of these instruments.
Most of the Groups surplus funds are held in the United
Kingdom or United States and there are no material funds where
repatriation is restricted as a result of foreign exchange
regulations.
Interest
Rate Risk
Interest rate exposure is managed within parameters that
stipulate that fixed rate borrowings should normally account for
no less than 25% and no more than 75% of net borrowings for each
major currency. This is achieved through the use of interest
rate swaps. Due to relatively low interest rates and the level
of the Groups debt, 100% of borrowings were fixed rate
debt or had been swapped into fixed rate borrowings at
December 31, 2010.
At December 31, 2010, the Group held interest rate swaps
(swapping floating for fixed) with notional principals of
$100 million and 75 million (2009
$250 million and 75 million). These swaps are
held to fix the interest payable on borrowings under the
Syndicated Facility. At December 31, 2010,
$100 million of US dollar borrowings were fixed at 1.99%
until May 2012 and 75 million of euro borrowings were
fixed at 5.25% until June 2011.
Based on the year-end net debt position and given the underlying
maturity profile of investments, borrowings and hedging
instruments at December 31, 2010, a one percentage point
rise in US dollar interest rates would increase the annual net
interest charge by approximately $nil (2009 $0.8 million,
2008 $4.7 million). A similar rise
75
in euro and sterling interest rates would increase the annual
net interest charge by approximately $nil (2009
$1.1 million, 2008 $1.2 million) and $nil (2009 $nil,
2008 $0.9 million), respectively.
Currency
Risk
The US dollar is the predominant currency of the Groups
revenue and cash flows. Movements in foreign exchange rates can
affect the Groups reported profits, net assets and
interest cover. To hedge translation exposure, wherever
possible, the Group matches the currency of its debt (either
directly or via derivatives) to the currency of its net assets,
while maximizing the amount of US dollars borrowed to reflect
the predominant trading currency. At December 31, 2010, the
Group held currency swaps with a principal of $415 million
(2009 $415 million) and short dated foreign exchange swaps
with principals of 75 million (2009 nil) and
HK$ 70 million (2009 nil).
The Group is exposed to foreign currency risk on income streams
denominated in foreign currencies. From time to time, the Group
hedges a portion of forecast foreign currency income by taking
out forward exchange contracts. The designated risk is the spot
foreign exchange risk. There were no such contracts in place at
either December 31, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
A general strengthening of the US dollar (specifically a five
cent fall in the sterling: US dollar rate) would increase the
Groups profit before tax by an estimated $3.5 million
(2009 $1.6 million, 2008 $4.0 million) and decrease
net assets by an estimated $5.6 million (2009
$4.1 million, 2008 $1.1 million). Similarly, a five
cent fall in the euro: US dollar rate would reduce the
Groups profit before tax by an estimated $1.4 million
(2009 $0.7 million, 2008 $2.0 million) and decrease
net assets by an estimated $8.2 million (2009
$4.5 million, 2008 $4.3 million).
76
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
The tables below provide information about the Groups
derivative and other financial instruments that are sensitive to
changes in interest rates, including interest rate swaps,
currency swaps and debt obligations. For long-term debt
obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related
weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For
interest rate swaps and currency swaps, the table presents
notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by expected
maturity dates. Weighted average variable rates are based on
rates set on the last day of the period. The actual currencies
of the instruments are indicated in parentheses.
At
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to mature before December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair
value(i)
|
|
|
($ million, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate public bonds (sterling)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
Fixed rate payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate lease debt (US dollar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Fixed rate payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate bank debt (various currencies)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Average interest rate payable
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(local currency million, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal (US dollar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Fixed rate payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Principal (euro)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Fixed rate payable
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate receivable
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(local currency million, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal receivable (sterling)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Fixed rate receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payable (US dollar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Represents the net present value of
the expected cash flows discounted at current market rates of
interest, except for the public bonds which are shown at market
value.
|
77
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Fees
and Charges Payable to a Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
Category (as defined by SEC)
|
|
Depositary actions
|
|
Associated fee
|
|
(a) Depositing or substituting the underlying shares
|
|
Each person to whom ADRs are issued against deposits of Shares,
including deposits and issuances in respect of:
|
|
$5 for each 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)
|
|
|
share distributions, stock split,
rights, merger
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of securities or any other
transactions or event or other distribution affecting the ADSs
or the Deposited Securities
|
|
|
(b) Receiving or distributing dividends
|
|
Distribution of stock dividends
|
|
$5 for each 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)
|
|
|
Distribution of cash
|
|
$0.02 or less per ADS (or portion thereof)
|
(c) Selling or exercising rights
|
|
Distribution or sale of securities, the fee being in an amount
equal to the fee for the execution and delivery of ADSs which
would have been charged as a result of the deposit of such
securities
|
|
$5.00 for each 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)
|
(d) Withdrawing an underlying security
|
|
Acceptance of ADRs surrendered for withdrawal of deposited
securities
|
|
$5.00 for each 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)
|
(e) Transferring, splitting or grouping receipts
|
|
Transfers, combining or grouping of depositary receipts
|
|
$1.50 per ADS
|
(f) General depositary services, particularly those charged on
an annual basis
|
|
Other services performed by the
depositary in administering the ADRs
|
|
$0.02 per ADS (or portion thereof)* not more than once each
calendar year and payable at the sole discretion of the
depositary by billing Holders or by deducting such charge from
one or more cash dividends or other cash distributions
|
(g) Expenses of the depositary
|
|
Expenses incurred on behalf of Holders in connection with:
Compliance with foreign exchange control
regulations or any law or regulation relating to foreign
investment
|
|
Expenses payable at the sole discretion of the depositary by
billing Holders or by deducting charges from one or more cash
dividends or other cash distributions $20 per transaction
|
|
|
The depositarys or its
custodians compliance with applicable law, rule or
regulation
|
|
|
|
|
Stock transfer or other taxes and other
governmental charges
|
|
|
|
|
Cable, telex, facsimile
transmission/delivery
|
|
|
|
|
transfer or registration fees in
connection with the deposit and withdrawal of Deposited
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses of the depositary in connection
with the conversion of foreign currency into US dollars
(which are paid out of such foreign currency)
|
|
|
|
|
Any other charge payable by depositary
or its agents
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
These fees are not currently being
charged by the depositary.
|
78
Fees
and Charges Payable by a Depositary
Direct
Payments
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is the depositary for IHGs ADS
program. The depositarys principal executive office is at:
1 Chase Manhattan Plaza, Floor 58, New York, NY
10005-1401,
United States of America. The depositary, has agreed to
reimburse certain reasonable Company expenses related to the
Companys ADR Program and incurred by the Company in
connection with the ADR Program. During the year ended December
31, 2010 the Company received $296,016.62 from the depositary in
respect of legal, accounting and other fees incurred in
connection with preparation of Form 20-F and ongoing SEC
compliance and listing requirements, investor relations programs
and advertising and public relations expenditure.
Indirect
Payments
As part of its service to the Company, JPMorgan has agreed to
waive fees for the standard costs associated with the
administration of the ADR Program, associated operating expenses
and investor relations advice. In the year ended December 31,
2010, JPMorgan agreed to waive fees and expenses amounting to
$20,000.
79
PART II
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
DEFAULTS,
DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
MATERIAL
MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
As at the end of the period covered by this report, the Group
carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the
participation of the Groups management, including the
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(c)
and
15d-15(e)).
These are defined as those controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports
filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the specified periods.
Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Groups disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Management has issued a report on the effectiveness of the
Groups Internal Control over Financial reporting as at
December 31, 2010. This report appears on
page F-1
of the Groups Consolidated Financial Statements contained
in this Annual Report.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. This
report appears on
page F-2
of the Groups Consolidated Financial Statements contained
in this Annual Report.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Groups internal controls
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
by this
Form 20-F
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Groups internal control over
financial reporting.
|
|
ITEM 16A.
|
AUDIT
COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
|
The Senior Independent Director David Kappler, who has
significant recent and relevant financial experience is the
Audit Committee Financial Expert as defined under
the regulations of the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
David Kappler is independent as that term is defined under the
listing standards of the NYSE.
The Board has adopted a global Code of Ethics and Business
Conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees of
the Group, including the Chief Executive and Chief Financial
Officer. This Code of Ethics has been signed by the Chief
Executive and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and by
the Group Financial Controller and regional financial heads. The
Company has published its Code of Ethics and Business Conduct on
its website www.ihgplc.com.
80
|
|
ITEM 16C.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Fees for professional services provided by Ernst &
Young LLP, the Groups independent auditors in each of the
last two fiscal periods in each of the following categories are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Audit related fees
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further detail is provided in Note 4 Auditors
remuneration paid to Ernst & Young LLP of
Item 18 Financial Statements.
Audit fees in respect of the pension scheme were not material.
The Audit Committee has a process to ensure that any non-audit
services do not compromise the independence and objectivity of
the external auditor and that relevant United Kingdom and United
States professional and regulatory requirements are met. A
number of criteria are applied when deciding whether
pre-approval for such services should be given. These include
the nature of the service, the level of fees and the
practicality of appointing an alternative provider, having
regard to the skills and experience required to supply the
service effectively. Cumulative fees for audit and non-audit
services are presented to the Audit Committee on a quarterly
basis for review. The Audit Committee is responsible for
monitoring adherence to the pre-approval policy.
|
|
ITEM 16D.
|
EXEMPTIONS
FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 16E.
|
PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total number
|
|
number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares (or
|
|
approximate dollar
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Average
|
|
units) purchased
|
|
value) of shares (or
|
|
|
(a) Total number
|
|
price paid
|
|
as part of publicly
|
|
units) that may yet be
|
|
|
of shares (or
|
|
per share
|
|
announced plans
|
|
purchased under the
|
Period of fiscal year
|
|
units) purchased
|
|
(or unit)
|
|
or programs
|
|
plans or programs
|
|
Month 1 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
866,100
|
|
|
|
£9.24
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,557,390
|
|
Month 2 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
£8.98
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,557,390
|
|
Month 3 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
215,900
|
|
|
|
£9.71
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,557,390
|
|
Month 4 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,557,390
|
|
Month 5 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,557,390
|
|
Month 6 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,777,533
|
*
|
Month 7 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,777,533
|
|
Month 8 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,777,533
|
|
Month 9 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,777,533
|
|
Month 10 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
£11.53
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,777,533
|
|
Month 11 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,777,533
|
|
Month 12 (no purchases in this month)
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
£12.32
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,777,533
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Reflects the resolution passed at
the Companys Annual General Meeting held on May 28,
2010.
|
The first share repurchase program was announced on
March 11, 2004 with the intention to repurchase
£250 million worth of shares. A second
£250 million share repurchase program followed,
announced September 9,
81
2004. A third £250 million share repurchase program
was announced on September 8, 2005. These programs were
completed on December 20, 2004, April 11, 2006, and
June 28, 2007 respectively.
On February 20, 2007, the Company announced a fourth,
£150 million share repurchase program. No shares were
repurchased in 2010. By March 25, 2011,
14,446,554 shares had been repurchased at an average price
of 831 pence per share (approximately £120 million).
During fiscal 2010, 3,109,000 ordinary shares were purchased by
the Companys Employee Share Ownership Trust at prices
ranging from 892 pence to 1232 pence per share, for the purpose
of satisfying future share awards to employees.
|
|
ITEM 16F.
|
CHANGE
IN REGISTRANTS CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 16G.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DIFFERENCES FROM NYSE
LISTING STANDARDS
|
The Group is committed to compliance with the principles of
corporate governance and aims to follow the corporate governance
practices specified in the Combined Code on Corporate
Governance, the Combined Code issued by the
Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom.
IHG has also adopted the corporate governance requirements of
the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules and of the NYSE, to
the extent that they are applicable to it as a foreign private
issuer. As a foreign private issuer IHG is required to disclose
any significant ways in which its corporate governance practices
differ from those followed by US companies. These are as follows:
Basis of
regulation
The Combined Code contains a series of principles and
provisions. It is not, however, mandatory for companies to
follow these principles. Instead, companies must disclose how
they have applied them and disclose, if applicable, any areas of
non-compliance along with an explanation for the non-compliance.
In contrast, US companies listed on the NYSE are required
to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines adopted by
the NYSE. IHGs statement of compliance with the UK
Combined Codes requirements for 2010 is contained in the
Companys Annual Report and Financial Statements for the
year ended December 31, 2010.
Independent
Directors
The Combined Codes principles recommend that at least half
the Board, excluding the Chairman, should consist of independent
Non-Executive Directors. As at March 25, 2011 the Board
consisted of the Chairman, independent at the time of his
appointment, four Executive Directors and six independent
Non-Executive Directors. NYSE listing rules applicable to US
companies state that companies must have a majority of
independent directors. The NYSE set out five bright line tests
for director independence. The Boards judgment is that all
of its Non-Executive Directors are independent. However it did
not explicitly take into consideration the NYSEs tests in
reaching this determination.
Chairman
and Chief Executive
The Combined Code recommends that the Chairman and Chief
Executive should not be the same individual to ensure that there
is a clear division of responsibility for the running of the
Companys business. There is no corresponding requirement
for US companies. The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive
were, as at March 25, 2011 and throughout 2010 fulfilled by
separate individuals.
Committees
The Company has a number of Board Committees which are similar
in purpose and constitution to those required for domestic
companies under NYSE rules. The Remuneration, Audit and
Nomination Committees consist
82
only of Non-Executive Directors. The NYSE requires US companies
to have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed
entirely of independent directors. The committee is responsible
for identifying individuals qualified to become Board members
and to recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance
principles. As the Company is subject to the Combined Code, the
Companys Nomination Committee is only responsible for
nominating, for approval of the Board, candidates for
appointment to the Board, though it also assists in developing
the role of the Senior Independent Director. The Companys
Nomination Committee consists of the Company Chairman and all
the independent Non-Executive Directors. The Chairman of the
Company is not a member of either of the Remuneration or the
Audit Committees. The Audit Committee is chaired by an
independent Non-Executive Director who, in the Boards
view, has the experience and qualifications to satisfy the
criteria under US rules for an audit committee financial
expert.
Non-Executive
Director Meetings
Non-management directors of US companies must meet on a regular
basis without management present, and independent directors must
meet separately at least once per year. The Companys
Non-Executive Directors have met without Executive Directors
being present, and intend to continue this practice, before
every Board meeting if possible.
Shareholder
approval of Equity Compensation Plans
The NYSE rules require that shareholders must be given the
opportunity to vote on all equity compensation plans and
material revisions to those plans. The Company complies with UK
requirements which are similar to the NYSE rules. The Board does
not, however, explicitly take into consideration the NYSEs
detailed definition of material revisions.
Code of
Ethics
The NYSE requires companies to adopt a code of business conduct
and ethics, applicable to directors, officers and employees. Any
waivers granted to directors or officers under such a code must
be promptly disclosed. The Companys Code of Ethics,
applicable to all directors, officers and employees, is
available on the Companys website. No waivers have been
granted under this Code.
Compliance
Certification
Each Chief Executive of a US company must certify to the NYSE
each year that he or she is not aware of any violation by the
Company of any NYSE corporate governance listing standard. As
the Company is a foreign private issuer, the Companys
Chief Executive is not required to make this certification.
However he is required to notify the NYSE promptly in writing
after any of the Companys Executive Officers become aware
of any non-compliance with those NYSE corporate governance rules
applicable to the Company.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 17.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Not applicable.
83
|
|
ITEM 18.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
The following Consolidated Financial Statements and related
schedule, together with the report thereon of Ernst &
Young LLP, are filed as part of this Annual Report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
|
|
Schedule for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report:
|
|
|
Exhibit 1
|
|
Articles of Association of IHG
|
Exhibit 4(a)(i)
|
|
Trust Deed dated November 27, 2009 relating to a £750
million Euro Medium Term Note Program, among InterContinental
Hotels Group PLC, Six Continents Limited, InterContinental
Hotels Limited and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company
(UK) Limited incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4(a)(i) of the InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
Annual Report on
Form 20-F
(file
No. 1-10409)
dated April 1, 2010).
|
Exhibit 4(a)(ii)
|
|
$2,100 million Facility Agreement dated May 2, 2008 among Bank
of America N.A., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd., Barclays
Capital, HSBC Bank plc, Lloyds TSB Bank plc, The Royal Bank of
Scotland plc, Société Générale Corporate
& Investment Banking and West LB AG (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4(a)(i) of the InterContinental Hotels
Group PLC Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 1-10409) dated
April 7, 2009)
|
Exhibit 4(b)(i)
|
|
Sale and Purchase Agreement dated March 10, 2006 among BHR
Luxembourg S.à.r.l., Others, Cooperatie Westbridge Europe
I.U.A., Others and Westbridge Hospitality Fund L.P. relating to
a portfolio of certain companies and businesses in continental
Europe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)(viii) of the
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Annual Report on Form 20-F
(File No. 1-10409) dated March 31, 2006)
|
Exhibit 4(b)(ii)
|
|
Sale and Purchase Agreement dated July 13, 2006 between BHR
Holdings BV and MSREF VI Danube BV relating to the sale of
certain companies and businesses in continental Europe and Side
Letter dated September 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4(b)(ix) of the InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Annual
Report on Form 20-F (File No. 1-10409) dated March 30, 2007)
|
Exhibit 4(c)(i)
|
|
James Abrahamsons service contract dated January 5,
2009, as amended by a letter dated July 5, 2010.
|
Exhibit 4(c)(ii)
|
|
Kirk Kinsells service contract commencing on
August 1, 2010, as amended by a letter dated July 5,
2010.
|
Exhibit 4(c)(iii)
|
|
Richard Solomons service contract dated March 16, 2011,
commencing on July 1, 2011.
|
84
|
|
|
Exhibit 4(c)(iv)
|
|
Richard Solomons service contract dated February 12, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)(iv) of
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Annual Report on Form 20-F
(File No. 1-10409) dated April 8, 2004)
|
Exhibit 4(c)(v)
|
|
Richard Solomons letter of appointment dated April 2005,
effective from June 27, 2005 on completion of the Scheme of
Arrangement and the introduction of the new parent company to
the Group (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)(vi) of the
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Annual Report on Form 20-F
(File No. 1-10409) dated March 31, 2006)
|
Exhibit 4(c)(vi)
|
|
Andrew Cossletts service contract dated December 13, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)(v) of
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Annual Report on Form 20-F
(File No. 1-10409) dated May 3, 2005)
|
Exhibit 4(c)(vii)
|
|
Andrew Cossletts letter of appointment dated April 2005,
effective from June 27, 2005 on completion of the Scheme of
Arrangement and the introduction of the new parent company to
the Group (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)(viii) of
the InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Annual Report on Form 20-F
(File No. 1-10409) dated March 31, 2006)
|
Exhibit 8
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
Exhibit 12(a)
|
|
Certification of Andrew Cosslett filed pursuant to 17 CFR
240.13a-14(a)
|
Exhibit 12(b)
|
|
Certification of Richard Solomons filed pursuant to 17 CFR
240.13a-14(a)
|
Exhibit 13(a)
|
|
Certification of Andrew Cosslett and Richard Solomons furnished
pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.1350
|
Exhibit 15(a)
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (included on page F-4)
|
85
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
(Company and together with its subsidiaries the
Group) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
Groups principal executive and principal financial
officers and effected by the Companys Board of Directors,
management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
The Groups internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the Groups transactions and
dispositions of the Groups assets; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the Group are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of the Groups management
and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the Groups assets that
could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In connection with the preparation of the Groups annual
Consolidated Financial Statements, management has undertaken an
assessment of the effectiveness of the Groups internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010
based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO).
Based on this assessment, management has concluded that as of
December 31, 2010, the Groups internal control over
financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public
accounting firm that audited the Groups Consolidated
Financial Statements, has issued an attestation report on the
Groups internal control over financial reporting, a copy
of which appears on the next page of this Annual Report.
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of InterContinental
Hotels Group PLC:
We have audited InterContinental Hotels Group PLCs
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010 based on criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the
COSO criteria). InterContinental Hotels Group
PLCs management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
Form 20-F.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Groups
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A groups internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A groups
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
group; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the group are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the group; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
groups assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
accompanying Consolidated statements of financial position of
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC as of December 31, 2010
and 2009, and the related Consolidated income statements,
Consolidated statements of comprehensive income, Consolidated
statements of changes in equity and Consolidated statements of
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010, and the financial statement schedule
listed in the Index at Item 18. Financial
Statements, and our report dated April 11, 2011 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
London, England
April 11, 2011
F-2
INTERCONTINENTAL
HOTELS GROUP PLC
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of InterContinental
Hotels Group PLC
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated statements of
financial position of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related Consolidated
income statements, Consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, Consolidated statements of changes in equity and
Consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits
also included the financial statements schedule listed in the
Index at Item 18. These financial statements and schedule
are the responsibility of the Groups management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its consolidated cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
adopted by the European Union and International Financial
Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board. Also, in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of InterContinental Hotels Group PLCs
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated April 11, 2011 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
London, England
April 11, 2011
F-3
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements
(Form F-3
No. 333-108084
and
Form S-8
Nos.
333-01572,
333-08336,
333-99785,
333-104691
and
333-126139)
of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC of the reference to our
name in Item 3. Key information and our reports
dated April 11, 2011, with respect to the Consolidated
Financial Statements and Schedule of InterContinental Hotels
Group PLC, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC,
included in this Annual Report
(Form 20-F)
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
London, England
April 11, 2011
F-4
INTERCONTINENTAL
HOTELS GROUP PLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Before
|
|
Exceptional
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
Exceptional
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
Exceptional
|
|
|
|
|
exceptional
|
|
items
|
|
|
|
exceptional
|
|
items
|
|
|
|
exceptional
|
|
items
|
|
|
|
|
items
|
|
(Note 5)
|
|
Total
|
|
items
|
|
(Note 5)
|
|
Total
|
|
items
|
|
(Note 5)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Revenue (Note 2)
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(753
|
)
|
|
|
(769
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(860
|
)
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
Other operating income and expenses
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
625
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (Note 2)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
Impairment (Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit/(loss) (Note 2)
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
417
|
|
Financial income (Note 6)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Financial expenses (Note 6)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) before tax
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
316
|
|
Tax (Note 7)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year from continuing operations
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
257
|
|
Profit for the year from discontinued operations (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the parent
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
262
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per ordinary share (Note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.5¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72.6¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89.5¢
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.9¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.2¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.8¢
|
|
Total operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.2¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.7¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91.3¢
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.6¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72.2¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.5¢
|
|
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an
integral part of these Financial Statements.
F-5
INTERCONTINENTAL
HOTELS GROUP PLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains/(losses) on valuation
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Losses/(gains) reclassified to income on impairment/disposal
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses arising during the year
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Reclassified to financial expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Defined benefit pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial losses, net of related tax credit of $7m (2009 $1m,
2008 $13m)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Change in asset restriction on plans in surplus and liability in
respect of funding commitments, net of related tax credit of
$10m (2009 $nil, 2008 $nil)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Exchange differences on retranslation of foreign operations,
including related tax credit of $1m (2009 $4m, 2008 $1m)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Tax related to pension contributions
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss)/income for the year
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to
equity holders of the parent
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an
integral part of these Financial Statements.
F-6
INTERCONTINENTAL
HOTELS GROUP PLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings and other reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
held by
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
employee
|
|
|
|
gains and
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
IHG
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Share
|
|
redemption
|
|
share
|
|
Other
|
|
losses
|
|
translation
|
|
Retained
|
|
shareholders
|
|
controlling
|
|
Total
|
|
|
shares(i)
|
|
value(i)
|
|
premium(ii)
|
|
reserve(ii)
|
|
trusts(iii)
|
|
reserves(iv)
|
|
reserve(v)
|
|
reserve(vi)
|
|
earnings
|
|
equity
|
|
interest
|
|
equity
|
|
|
($ million, number of shares millions)
|
|
At January 1, 2010
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2,900
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
2,656
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on valuation of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Losses reclassified to income on impairment of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Losses on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified to financial expenses on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Change in asset restriction on pension plans in surplus and
liability in respect of funding commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Exchange differences on retranslation of foreign operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Tax related to pension contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
Issue of ordinary shares
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Purchase of own shares by employee share trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Release of own shares by employee share trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Equity-settled share-based cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Tax related to share schemes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Equity dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(2,894
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
2,775
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All items are shown net of tax.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an
integral part of these Financial Statements.
F-7
INTERCONTINENTAL
HOTELS GROUP PLC
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN
EQUITY (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings and other reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
held by
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
employee
|
|
|
|
gains and
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
IHG
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Share
|
|
redemption
|
|
share
|
|
Other
|
|
losses
|
|
translation
|
|
Retained
|
|
shareholders
|
|
controlling
|
|
Total
|
|
|
shares(i)
|
|
value(i)
|
|
premium(ii)
|
|
reserve(ii)
|
|
trusts(iii)
|
|
reserves(iv)
|
|
reserve(v)
|
|
reserve(vi)
|
|
earnings
|
|
equity
|
|
interest
|
|
equity
|
|
|
($ million, number of shares millions)
|
|
At January 1, 2009
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(2,890
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
2,624
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on valuation of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Losses reclassified to income on impairment of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Losses on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified to financial expenses on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Change in asset restriction on pension plans in surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Exchange differences on retranslation of foreign operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Issue of ordinary shares
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Purchase of own shares by employee share trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Release of own shares by employee share trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Equity-settled share-based cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Tax related to share schemes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Equity dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2,900
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
2,656
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All items are shown net of tax.
F-8
INTERCONTINENTAL
HOTELS GROUP PLC
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN
EQUITY (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings and other reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
held by
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
employee
|
|
|
|
gains and
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
IHG
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Share
|
|
redemption
|
|
share
|
|
Other
|
|
losses
|
|
translation
|
|
Retained
|
|
shareholders
|
|
controlling
|
|
Total
|
|
|
shares(i)
|
|
value(i)
|
|
premium(ii)
|
|
reserve(ii)
|
|
trusts(iii)
|
|
reserves(iv)
|
|
reserve(v)
|
|
reserve(vi)
|
|
earnings
|
|
equity
|
|
interest
|
|
equity
|
|
|
($ million, number of shares millions)
|
|
At January 1, 2008
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(2,918
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on valuation of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Gains reclassified to income on disposal of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Losses on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified to financial expenses on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Change in asset restriction on pension plans in surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Exchange differences on retranslation of foreign operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Tax related to pension contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Issue of ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
Transfer to capital redemption reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of own shares by employee share trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Release of own shares by employee share trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Equity-settled share-based cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Tax related to share schemes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Equity dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(2,890
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
2,624
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All items are shown net of tax.
At December 31, 2007 the
authorized share capital was £160,050,000 comprising
1,175,000,000 ordinary shares of 13
29/47
pence each and one redeemable preference share of £50,000.
F-9
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
The Company was incorporated and
registered in England and Wales with registered number 5134420
on May 21, 2004 as a limited company under the Companies
Act 1985 with the name Hackremco (No. 2154) Limited.
On March 24, 2005 Hackremco (No. 2154) Limited
changed its name to New InterContinental Hotels Group Limited.
On April 27, 2005 New InterContinental Hotels Group Limited
re-registered
as a public limited company and changed its name to New
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC. On June 27, 2005
New InterContinental Hotels Group PLC changed its name to
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC.
|
|
|
|
On June 1, 2006, shareholders
approved a share capital consolidation on the basis of seven new
ordinary shares for every eight existing ordinary shares. This
provided for all the authorized ordinary shares of 10 pence each
(whether issued or unissued) to be consolidated into new
ordinary shares of
113/7
pence each. The share capital consolidation became effective on
June 12, 2006.
|
|
|
|
On June 1, 2007, shareholders
approved a share capital consolidation on the basis of 47 new
ordinary shares for every 56 existing ordinary shares. This
provided for all the authorized ordinary shares of
113/7
pence each (whether issued or unissued) to be consolidated into
new ordinary shares of
1329/47
pence each. The share capital consolidation became effective on
June 4, 2007.
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, the
authorized share capital was £160,050,000, comprising
1,175,000,000 ordinary shares of
1329/47
pence each and one redeemable preference share of £50,000.
As a result of the resolution passed at the Annual General
Meeting on May 29, 2009 amending the articles of
association in line with the Companies Act 2006, from
October 1, 2009 the Company no longer has an authorized
share capital.
|
|
|
|
During 2004 and 2005, the Company
undertook to return funds of up to £750 million to
shareholders by way of three consecutive £250 million
share repurchase programs, the third of which was completed in
the first half of 2007. In June 2007, a further
£150 million share repurchase program commenced.
|
|
|
|
During 2008, 9,219,325 (2007
7,724,844) ordinary shares were repurchased and canceled under
the authorities granted by shareholders at the Extraordinary
General Meeting held on June 1, 2007 and at the Annual
General Meeting held on May 30, 2008. The Company deferred
its £150 million share repurchase program in November
2008 in order to preserve cash and maintain the strength of the
Groups financial position. No shares were repurchased in
2010 or 2009.
|
|
|
|
The authority given to the Company
at the Annual General Meeting on May 28, 2010 to purchase
its own shares was still valid at December 31, 2010. A
resolution to renew the authority will be put to shareholders at
the Annual General Meeting on May 27, 2011.
|
|
(ii)
|
|
The share premium reserve and
capital redemption reserve are not distributable. The share
premium reserve has a balance of $94 million (2009
$79 million, 2008 $61 million) representing the amount
of proceeds received for shares in excess of their nominal
value. The capital redemption reserve maintains the nominal
value of the equity share capital of the Company when shares are
repurchased or canceled.
|
|
(iii)
|
|
The shares held by employee share
trusts comprises $34.6 million (2009 $3.8 million,
2008 $49.2 million) in respect of 1.9 million (2009
0.3 million, 2008 3.0 million) InterContinental Hotels
Group PLC ordinary shares held by employee share trusts, with a
market value at December 31, 2010 of $37 million (2009
$4 million, 2008 $25 million).
|
|
(iv)
|
|
Other reserves comprises the merger
and revaluation reserves previously recognized under UK GAAP,
together with the reserve arising as a consequence of the
Groups capital reorganization in June 2005. Following the
change in presentational currency to the US dollar in 2008, this
reserve also includes exchange differences arising on the
retranslation to period-end exchange rates of equity share
capital, the capital redemption reserve and shares held by
employee share trusts.
|
|
(v)
|
|
The unrealized gains and losses
reserve records movements to fair value of
available-for-sale
financial assets and the effective portion of the cumulative net
change in the fair value of the cash flow hedging instruments
related to hedged transactions that have not yet occurred.
|
|
|
|
The fair value of cash flow hedging
instruments outstanding at December 31, 2010 was a
$4 million liability (2009 $7 million, 2008
$10 million).
|
|
(vi)
|
|
The currency translation reserve
records the movement in exchange differences arising from the
translation of the financial statements of foreign operations
and exchange differences on foreign currency borrowings and
derivative instruments that provide a hedge against net
investments in foreign operations. On adoption of IFRS,
cumulative exchange differences were deemed to be $nil as
permitted by IFRS 1.
|
|
|
|
The fair value of derivative
instruments designated as hedges of net investments in foreign
operations outstanding at December 31, 2010 was a
$40 million liability (2009 $13 million, 2008 $nil).
|
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an
integral part of these Financial Statements.
F-10
INTERCONTINENTAL
HOTELS GROUP PLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment (Note 10)
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
Goodwill (Note 12)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Intangible assets (Note 13)
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
Investment in associates (Note 14)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Retirement benefit assets (Note 3)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Other financial assets (Note 15)
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Deferred tax assets (Note 25)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories (Note 16)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Trade and other receivables (Note 17)
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
Current tax receivable
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 18)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other financial assets (Note 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (Note 2)
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and other borrowings (Note 22)
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
|
(106)
|
|
Derivative financial instruments (Note 23)
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Trade and other payables (Note 19)
|
|
|
(722)
|
|
|
|
(668)
|
|
Provisions (Note 20)
|
|
|
(30)
|
|
|
|
(65)
|
|
Current tax payable
|
|
|
(167)
|
|
|
|
(194)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
(943)
|
|
|
|
(1,040)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and other borrowings (Note 22)
|
|
|
(776)
|
|
|
|
(1,016)
|
|
Derivative financial instruments (Note 23)
|
|
|
(38)
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
Retirement benefit obligations (Note 3)
|
|
|
(200)
|
|
|
|
(142)
|
|
Trade and other payables (Note 19)
|
|
|
(464)
|
|
|
|
(408)
|
|
Provisions (Note 20)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities (Note 25)
|
|
|
(84)
|
|
|
|
(118)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,564)
|
|
|
|
(1,697)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities (Note 2)
|
|
|
(2,507)
|
|
|
|
(2,737)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity share capital
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
Capital redemption reserve
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Shares held by employee share trusts
|
|
|
(35)
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Other reserves
|
|
|
(2,894)
|
|
|
|
(2,900)
|
|
Unrealized gains and losses reserve
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Currency translation reserve
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,775
|
|
|
|
2,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IHG shareholders equity
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an
integral part of these Financial Statements.
F-11
INTERCONTINENTAL
HOTELS GROUP PLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Adjustments for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financial expenses
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Income tax charge/(credit)
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Other exceptional operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets, net of tax
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Equity-settled share-based cost, net of payments
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow before movements in working capital
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Net change in loyalty program liability and System Fund surplus
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in other trade and other payables
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
Utilization of provisions
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefit contributions, net of cost
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Cash flows relating to exceptional operating items
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
Interest received
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Tax (paid)/received on operating activities
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Purchases of intangible assets
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Investment in associates and other financial assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Disposal of assets, net of costs and cash disposed of
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Proceeds from associates and other financial assets
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Tax paid on disposals
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issue of share capital
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Purchase of own shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
Purchase of own shares by employee share trusts
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Proceeds on release of own shares by employee share trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Dividends paid to shareholders
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Issue of £250m 6% bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in other borrowings
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net movement in cash and cash equivalents in the year
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Exchange rate effects
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an
integral part of these Financial Statements.
F-12
|
|
Note 1
|
Accounting
policies
|
General
information
The consolidated financial statements of InterContinental Hotels
Group PLC (the Group or IHG) for the
year ended December 31, 2010 were authorized for issue to
the UK listing authorities in accordance with a resolution of
the Directors on February 14, 2011. InterContinental Hotels
Group PLC (the Company) is incorporated in Great
Britain and registered in England and Wales.
On February 23, 2011, the Group received an unfavorable
court judgment in respect of a prior year litigation claim. As
required by IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and
Contingent Assets and IAS 10 Events after the
Reporting Period, the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended December 31, 2010, authorized by the
Directors on April 11, 2011, for issue on Form 20-F include a
litigation provision of $22 million ($13 million net
of tax) to reflect this adjusting post balance sheet event.
The impact of the above adjusting post balance sheet event is
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial
|
|
|
Statements authorized on
|
|
|
February 14, 2011
|
|
April 11, 2011
|
|
Profit before tax ($ million)
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
Profit for the year ($ million)
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
Net assets ($ million)
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Basic earnings per share (cents)
|
|
|
101.7
|
|
|
|
97.2
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (cents)
|
|
|
99.0
|
|
|
|
94.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the provision has been recorded as an exceptional item, there
was no impact on results before exceptional items and adjusted
earnings per share.
Summary
of significant accounting policies
Basis
of preparation
The Consolidated Financial Statements of IHG have been prepared
in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board (IASB) and in accordance with IFRS
as adopted by the European Union (EU), and as
applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act
2006. IFRS as adopted by the EU differs in certain respects from
IFRS as issued by the IASB, however, the differences have no
impact on the Groups Consolidated Financial Statements for
the years presented.
Changes
in accounting policies
With effect from January 1, 2010, the Group has implemented
the following new accounting standards, amendments and
interpretations. None of these have had a material impact on the
Groups financial performance or position during the year
and there has been no requirement to restate prior year
comparatives.
IFRS 3 (Revised) Business Combinations changes the
accounting for transaction costs, the valuation of
non-controlling interests, the initial recognition and
subsequent measurement of contingent consideration, and business
combinations achieved in stages. These changes will impact the
amount of goodwill recognized and the reported results in the
period when an acquisition occurs and future reported results.
These changes only apply to new acquisitions and there have been
none during the year.
IAS 27 (Revised) Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements requires the effects of all transactions with
non-controlling interests to be recorded in equity if there is
no change in control and such transactions no longer result in
goodwill or gains and losses. The standard also specifies the
accounting when control is lost; any remaining interest in the
entity is remeasured to fair value with a gain or loss
recognized in profit or loss.
IFRIC 17 Distribution of Non-cash assets to Owners
provides guidance on accounting for arrangements where non-cash
assets are distributed to shareholders.
F-13
IAS 39 (amendment) Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement Eligible Hedged Items clarifies
that an entity is permitted to designate a portion of the fair
value changes or cash flow variability of a financial instrument
as a hedged item. The amendment also specifies that inflation is
not a separately identifiable risk and cannot be designated as
the hedged risk unless it represents a contractually specified
cash flow.
IFRS 2 (amendment) Share-based Payment: Group Cash-settled
Share-based Payment Arrangements provides guidance on
accounting for inter-group cash-settled share-based payment
transactions in the separate financial statements of an entity.
IFRS 5 (amendment) Non-current Assets Held for Sale and
Discontinued Operations clarifies that disclosures
required in respect of non-current assets and disposal groups
classified as held for sale or discontinued operations are only
those set out in IFRS 5.
IFRS 8 (amendment) Operating Segments clarifies that
segment assets and liabilities need only be reported when
included in information reviewed by the chief operating decision
maker.
IAS 7 (amendment) Statement of Cash Flows states
that only expenditure resulting in recognition of an asset can
be presented as a cash flow from investing activities.
IAS 17 (amendment) Leases clarifies that a lease of
land should be classified as an operating or finance lease in
accordance with the economic substance of the arrangement.
IAS 36 (amendment) Impairment of Assets clarifies
that the largest permitted unit for allocation of goodwill is
the IFRS 8 operating segment before aggregation for reporting
purposes.
IFRIC 16 (amendment) Hedges of a Net Investment in a
Foreign Operation removes the restriction on a hedged
foreign operation holding the hedging instruments.
Changes
in presentation
The Consolidated statement of changes in equity has been
expanded to include an analysis of other comprehensive income by
each component of equity. The additional information is
presented in accordance with best practice and will become
mandatory in 2011.
The fair values of derivative financial instruments are
presented separately on the face of the Consolidated statement
of financial position for the first time (previously included
within current Trade and other payables) due to
their increased materiality and in accordance with best
practice.
Net debt has been redefined to include the exchange element of
the fair value of currency swaps that fix the value of the
Groups £250m 6% bonds. This change has been made to
reflect the commercial rationale of the hedging relationship.
See Notes 23 and 24 for further details.
Presentational
currency
The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in millions
of US dollars following a management decision to change the
reporting currency from sterling during 2008. The change was
made to reflect the profile of the Groups revenue and
operating profit which are primarily generated in US dollars or
US dollar-linked currencies.
The currency translation reserve was set to nil at
January 1, 2004 on transition to IFRS and this reserve is
presented on the basis that the Group has reported in US dollars
since this date. Equity share capital, the capital redemption
reserve and shares held by employee share trusts are translated
into US dollars at the rates of exchange on the last day of the
period; the resultant exchange differences are recorded in other
reserves.
The functional currency of the parent company remains sterling
since this is a non-trading holding company located in the
United Kingdom that has sterling denominated share capital and
whose primary activity is the payment and receipt of interest on
sterling denominated external borrowings and inter-company
balances.
F-14
Basis
of consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements comprise the financial
statements of the parent company and entities controlled by the
Company. All intra-group balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
The results of those businesses acquired or disposed of are
consolidated for the period during which they were under the
Groups control.
Foreign
currencies
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the
functional currency at the exchange rates ruling on the dates of
the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies are retranslated to the functional currency
at the relevant rates of exchange ruling on the last day of the
period. All foreign exchange differences arising on translation
are recognized in the income statement except on foreign
currency borrowings that provide a hedge against a net
investment in a foreign operation. These are taken directly to
the currency translation reserve until the disposal of the net
investment, at which time they are recycled against the gain or
loss on disposal.
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including
goodwill, are translated into US dollars at the relevant rates
of exchange ruling on the last day of the period. The revenues
and expenses of foreign operations are translated into US
dollars at average rates of exchange for the period. The
exchange differences arising on the retranslation are taken
directly to the currency translation reserve. On disposal of a
foreign operation, the cumulative amount recognized in the
currency translation reserve relating to that particular foreign
operation is recycled against the gain or loss on disposal.
Property,
plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less
depreciation and any impairment.
Borrowing costs attributable to the acquisition or construction
of an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time
to prepare for its intended use or sale are capitalized as part
of the asset cost. All other borrowing costs are expensed as
incurred. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs
that an entity incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds.
However, all borrowing costs relating to projects commencing
before January 1, 2009 were expensed.
Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Land is not depreciated. All other property, plant and equipment
are depreciated to a residual value over their estimated useful
lives, namely:
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
lesser of 50 years and unexpired term of lease; and
|
Fixtures, fittings and equipment
|
|
three to 25 years.
|
All depreciation is charged on a straight-line basis. Residual
value is reassessed annually.
Property, plant and equipment are tested for impairment when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value may not be recoverable. Assets that do not generate
independent cash flows are combined into cash-generating units.
If carrying values exceed their estimated recoverable amount,
the assets or cash-generating units are written down to the
recoverable amount. Recoverable amount is the greater of fair
value less costs to sell and value in use. Value in use is
assessed based on estimated future cash flows discounted to
their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects
current market assessments of the time value of money and the
risks specific to the asset. Impairment losses, and any
subsequent reversals, are recognized in the income statement.
On adoption of IFRS, the Group retained previous revaluations of
property, plant and equipment at deemed cost as permitted by
IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial
Reporting Standards.
F-15
Goodwill
Goodwill arises on consolidation and is recorded at cost, being
the excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value at the
date of acquisition of the Groups share of identifiable
assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities. With effect from
January 1, 2010, transaction costs are expensed and therefore
not included in the cost of acquisition. Following initial
recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated
impairment losses.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually by comparing
carrying values of cash-generating units with their recoverable
amounts. Impairment losses cannot be subsequently reversed.
Intangible
assets
Software
Acquired software licenses and software developed in-house are
capitalized on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and
bring to use the specific software. Costs are amortized over
estimated useful lives of three to five years on a straight-line
basis.
Internally generated development costs are expensed unless
forecast revenues exceed attributable forecast development
costs, at which time they are capitalized and amortized over the
life of the asset.
Management
contracts
When assets are sold and a purchaser enters into a franchise or
management contract with the Group, the Group capitalizes as
part of the gain or loss on disposal an estimate of the fair
value of the contract entered into. The value of management
contracts is amortized over the life of the contract which
ranges from six to 50 years on a straight-line basis.
Other
intangible assets
Amounts paid to hotel owners to secure management contracts and
franchise agreements are capitalized and amortized over the
shorter of the contracted period and 10 years on a
straight-line basis.
Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may
not be recoverable.
Associates
An associate is an entity over which the Group has the ability
to exercise significant influence, but not control, through
participation in the financial and operating policy decisions of
the entity.
Associates are accounted for using the equity method unless the
associate is classified as held for sale. Under the equity
method, the Groups investment is recorded at cost adjusted
by the Groups share of post-acquisition profits and
losses. When the Groups share of losses exceeds its
interest in an associate, the Groups carrying amount is
reduced to $nil and recognition of further losses is
discontinued except to the extent that the Group has incurred
legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of
an associate.
Financial
assets
The Group classifies its financial assets into one of the two
following categories: loans and receivables or
available-for-sale
financial assets. Management determines the classification of
financial assets on initial recognition and they are
subsequently held at amortized cost (loans and receivables) or
fair value
(available-for-sale
financial assets). Interest on loans and receivables is
calculated using the effective interest rate method and is
recognized in the income statement as interest income.
Changes in fair values of
available-for-sale
financial assets are recorded directly in equity within the
unrealized gains and losses reserve. On disposal, the
accumulated fair value adjustments recognized in equity are
recycled to the income statement. Dividends from
available-for-sale
financial assets are recognized in the income statement as other
operating income and expenses.
F-16
Financial assets are assessed for impairment at each period-end
date. In the case of an equity investment classified as
available-for-sale,
a significant or prolonged decline in fair value below cost is
evidence that the asset is impaired. If an
available-for-sale
financial asset is impaired, the difference between original
cost and fair value is transferred from equity to the income
statement to the extent of any cumulative loss recorded in
equity, with any excess charged directly to the income
statement. Impairment losses on equity instruments are not
reversed through the income statement.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable
value.
Trade
receivables
Trade receivables are recorded at their original amount less
provision for impairment. It is the Groups policy to
provide for 100% of the previous months aged receivables
balances which are more than 180 days past due. Adjustments
to the policy may be made due to specific or exceptional
circumstances when collection is no longer considered probable.
The carrying amount of the receivable is reduced through the use
of a provision account and movements in the provision are
recognized in the income statement within cost of sales. When a
previously provided trade receivable is uncollectable, it is
written off against the provision.
Cash
and cash equivalents
Cash comprises cash in hand and demand deposits.
Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments with
an original maturity of three months or less that are readily
convertible to known amounts of cash and subject to
insignificant risk of changes in value.
In the Consolidated statement of cash flows, cash and cash
equivalents are shown net of short-term overdrafts which are
repayable on demand and form an integral part of the
Groups cash management.
Assets
held for sale
Non-current assets and associated liabilities are classified as
held for sale when their carrying amount will be recovered
principally through a sale transaction rather than continuing
use and a sale is highly probable.
Assets designated as held for sale are held at the lower of
carrying amount at designation and fair value less costs to sell.
Depreciation is not charged against property, plant and
equipment classified as held for sale.
Financial
liabilities
Financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the
effective interest rate method. A financial liability is
derecognized when the obligation under the liability expires, is
discharged or canceled.
Trade
payables
Trade payables are non-interest-bearing and are stated at their
nominal value.
Bank
and other borrowings
Bank and other borrowings are initially recognized at the fair
value of the consideration received less directly attributable
transaction costs. They are subsequently measured at amortized
cost. Finance charges, including the transaction costs and any
discount or premium on issue, are charged to the income
statement using the effective interest rate method.
Borrowings are classified as non-current when the repayment date
is more than 12 months from the period-end date or where
they are drawn on a facility with more than 12 months to
expiry.
F-17
Derivative
financial instruments and hedging
Derivatives are initially recognized and subsequently remeasured
at fair value. The method of recognizing the remeasurement
depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging
instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income and the
unrealized gains and losses reserve to the extent that the
hedges are effective. When the hedged item is recognized, the
cumulative gains and losses on the related hedging instrument
are reclassified to the income statement.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as net
investment hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income and
the currency translation reserve to the extent that the hedges
are effective. The cumulative gains and losses remain in equity
until a foreign operation is sold, at which point they are
reclassified to the income statement.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives which have either not
been designated as hedging instruments or relate to the
ineffective portion of hedges are recognized immediately in the
income statement.
Documentation outlining the measurement and effectiveness of any
hedging arrangements is maintained throughout the life of the
hedge relationship.
Interest arising from currency derivatives and interest rate
swaps is recorded in financial income or expenses on a net basis
over the term of the agreement, unless the accounting treatment
for the hedging relationship requires the interest to be taken
to reserves.
Self
insurance
The Group undertakes self insurance for various insurable risks
including property damage/business interruption, fidelity
guarantee, general liability, workers
compensation/employers liability and employee medical and
dental coverage from time to time in line with economic
conditions and trends within the global insurance market.
Insurance reserves for self insurance include projected
settlements for known and incurred but not reported claims.
Projected settlements are estimated based on historical trends
and actuarial data.
Provisions
Provisions are recognized when the Group has a present
obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that a
payment will be made and a reliable estimate of the amount
payable can be made. If the effect of the time value of money is
material, the provision is discounted.
An onerous contract provision is recognized when the unavoidable
costs of meeting the obligations under a contract exceed the
economic benefits expected to be received under it.
Taxes
Current
tax
Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current and
prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be
recovered from or paid to the tax authorities including
interest. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount
are those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the end
of the reporting period.
Deferred
tax
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized in respect of
temporary differences between the tax base and carrying value of
assets and liabilities, including accelerated capital
allowances, unrelieved tax losses, unremitted profits from
overseas where the Group does not control remittance, gains
rolled over into replacement assets, gains on previously
revalued properties and other short-term temporary differences.
F-18
Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is
regarded as probable that the deductible temporary differences
can be realized. The recoverability of all deferred tax assets
is reassessed at the end of each reporting period.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to
apply in the periods in which the asset or liability will be
settled, based on rates enacted or substantively enacted at the
end of the reporting period.
Retirement
benefits
Defined
contribution plans
Payments to defined contribution schemes are charged to the
income statement as they fall due.
Defined
benefit plans
Plan assets are measured at fair value and plan liabilities are
measured on an actuarial basis, using the projected unit credit
method and discounting at an interest rate equivalent to the
current rate of return on a high quality corporate bond of
equivalent currency and term to the plan liabilities. The
difference between the value of plan assets and liabilities at
the period-end date is the amount of surplus or deficit recorded
in the statement of financial position as an asset or liability.
An asset is recognized when the employer has an unconditional
right to use the surplus at some point during the life of the
plan or on its wind up. If a refund would be subject to a tax
other than income tax, as is the case in the United Kingdom, the
asset is recorded at the amount net of tax. A liability is also
recorded for any such tax that would be payable in respect of
funding commitments based on the accounting assumption that the
related payments increase the asset.
The service cost of providing pension benefits to employees for
the year is charged to the income statement. The cost of making
improvements to pensions is recognized in the income statement
on a straight-line basis over the period during which any
increase in benefits vests. To the extent that improvements in
benefits vest immediately, the cost is recognized immediately as
an expense.
Actuarial gains and losses may result from: differences between
the expected return and the actual return on plan assets;
differences between the actuarial assumptions underlying the
plan liabilities and actual experience during the year; or
changes in the actuarial assumptions used in the valuation of
the plan liabilities. Actuarial gains and losses, and taxation
thereon, are recognized in the Consolidated statement of
comprehensive income.
Actuarial valuations are normally carried out every three years
and are updated for material transactions and other material
changes in circumstances (including changes in market prices and
interest rates) up to the end of the reporting period.
Revenue
recognition
Revenue is the gross inflow of economic benefits received and
receivable by the Group on its own account where those inflows
result in increases in equity.
Revenue is derived from the following sources: franchise fees;
management fees; owned and leased properties and other revenues
which are ancillary to the Groups operations, including
technology fee income.
Generally, revenue represents sales (excluding VAT and similar
taxes) of goods and services, net of discounts, provided in the
normal course of business and recognized when services have been
rendered. The following is a description of the composition of
revenues of the Group.
Franchise fees received in connection with the
license of the Groups brand names, usually under long-term
contracts with the hotel owner. The Group charges franchise
royalty fees as a percentage of rooms revenue. Revenue is
recognized when earned and realized or realizable under the
terms of the agreement.
Management fees earned from hotels managed by the
Group, usually under long-term contracts with the hotel owner.
Management fees include a base fee, which is generally a
percentage of hotel revenue, and an incentive fee, which is
generally based on the hotels profitability or cash flows.
Revenue is recognized when earned and realized or realizable
under the terms of the contract.
F-19
Owned and leased primarily derived from hotel
operations, including the rental of rooms and food and beverage
sales from owned and leased hotels operated under the
Groups brand names. Revenue is recognized when rooms are
occupied and food and beverages are sold.
Share-based
payments
The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is
measured by reference to fair value at the date at which the
right to the shares is granted. Fair value is determined by an
external valuer using option pricing models.
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognized, together
with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in
which any performance or service conditions are fulfilled,
ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully
entitled to the award (vesting date).
The income statement charge for a period represents the movement
in cumulative expense recognized at the beginning and end of
that period. No expense is recognized for awards that do not
ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional
upon a market or non-vesting condition, which are treated as
vesting irrespective of whether or not the market or non-vesting
condition is satisfied, provided that all other performance
and/or
service conditions are satisfied.
The Group has taken advantage of the transitional provisions of
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment in respect of
equity-settled awards and has applied IFRS 2 only to
equity-settled awards granted after November 7, 2002 that
had not vested before January 1, 2005.
Leases
Operating lease rentals are charged to the income statement on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Assets held under finance leases, which transfer to the Group
substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership
of the leased item, are capitalized at the inception of the
lease, with a corresponding liability being recognized for the
fair value of the leased asset or, if lower, the present value
of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned
between the reduction of the lease liability and finance charges
in the income statement so as to achieve a constant rate of
interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Assets held
under finance leases are depreciated over the shorter of the
estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term.
Disposal
of non-current assets
The Group recognizes sales proceeds and any related gain or loss
on disposal on completion of the sales process. In determining
whether the gain or loss should be recorded, the Group considers
whether it:
|
|
|
|
|
has a continuing managerial involvement to the degree associated
with asset ownership;
|
|
|
|
has transferred the significant risks and rewards associated
with asset ownership; and
|
|
|
|
can reliably measure and will actually receive the proceeds.
|
Discontinued
operations
Discontinued operations are those relating to hotels or
operations sold or those classified as held for sale when the
results relate to a separate line of business, geographical area
of operations, or where there is a co-ordinated plan to dispose
of a separate line of business or geographical area of
operations.
Exceptional
items
The Group discloses certain financial information both including
and excluding exceptional items. The presentation of information
excluding exceptional items allows a better understanding of the
underlying trading performance of the Group and provides
consistency with the Groups internal management reporting.
Exceptional items are identified by virtue of either their size
or nature so as to facilitate comparison with prior periods and
to assess underlying trends in financial performance.
Exceptional items can include, but are not restricted to, gains
and losses on the disposal of assets, impairment charges and
reversals, restructuring costs and the release of tax provisions.
F-20
Use of
accounting estimates and judgments
The preparation of financial statements requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions and conditions.
The estimates and assumptions that have the most significant
effect on the amounts recognized in the financial statements are:
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables a provision for impairment of
trade receivables is made on the basis of historical experience
and other factors considered relevant by management.
|
|
|
|
Impairment the Group determines whether goodwill is
impaired on an annual basis or more frequently if there are
indicators of impairment. Other non-current assets, including
property, plant and equipment, are tested for impairment if
there are indicators of impairment. Impairment testing requires
an estimate of future cash flows and the choice of a suitable
discount rate and, in the case of hotels, an assessment of
recoverable amount based on comparable market transactions.
|
|
|
|
System Fund in addition to management or franchise
fees, hotels within the IHG system pay cash assessments and
contributions which are collected by IHG for specific use within
the System Fund (the Fund). The Fund also receives
proceeds from the sale of Priority Club Rewards points. IHG
exerts significant influence over the operation of the Fund,
however the Fund is managed for the benefit of hotels in the
system with the objective of driving revenues for the hotels.
The Fund is used to pay for marketing, the Priority Club Rewards
loyalty program and the global reservation system. The Fund is
planned to operate at breakeven with any short-term timing
surplus or deficit carried in the Consolidated statement of
financial position within working capital.
|
As all Fund income is designated for specific purposes and does
not result in a profit or loss for the Group, the revenue
recognition criteria as outlined in the accounting policy above
are not met and therefore the income and expenses of the Fund
are not included in the Consolidated income statement.
The assets and liabilities relating to the Fund are included in
the appropriate headings in the Consolidated statement of
financial position as the related legal, but not beneficial,
rights and obligations rest with the Group. These assets and
liabilities include the Priority Club Rewards liability,
short-term timing surpluses and deficits and any receivables and
payables related to the Fund.
The cash flows relating to the Fund are reported within
cash flow from operations in the
Consolidated statement of cash flows due to the close
interrelationship between the Fund and the trading operations of
the Group.
Further information on the Fund is included in Note 31.
|
|
|
|
|
Loyalty program the hotel loyalty program, Priority
Club Rewards, enables members to earn points, funded through
hotel assessments, during each qualifying stay at an IHG branded
hotel and redeem points at a later date for free accommodation
or other benefits. The future redemption liability is included
in trade and other payables and is estimated using eventual
redemption rates determined by actuarial methods and points
values. Actuarial gains and losses on the future redemption
liability are borne by the System Fund and any resulting changes
in the liability would correspondingly adjust the amount of
short-term timing differences held in the Consolidated statement
of financial position.
|
|
|
|
Retirement and other post-employment benefits the
cost of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment
benefits is determined using actuarial valuations. The actuarial
valuation involves making assumptions about discount rates,
expected rates of return on assets, future salary increases,
mortality rates and future pension increases.
|
|
|
|
Tax provisions for tax accruals require judgments on
the interpretation of tax legislation, developments in tax case
law and the potential outcomes of tax audits and appeals. In
addition, deferred tax assets are recognized for unused tax
attributes to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit
will be available
|
F-21
|
|
|
|
|
against which they can be utilized. Judgment is required as to
the amount that can be recognized based on the likely amount and
timing of future taxable profits, taking into account expected
tax planning. Deferred tax balances are dependent on
managements expectations regarding the manner and timing
of recovery of the related assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other the Group also makes estimates and judgments
in the valuation of franchise and management agreements acquired
on asset disposals, the valuation of financial assets classified
as
available-for-sale,
the outcome of legal proceedings and claims and in the valuation
of share-based payment costs.
|
New
standards issued but not effective
The following accounting standards, amendments and
interpretations with an effective date after the date of these
financial statements have not been adopted early by the Group
and will be adopted in accordance with the effective date. The
Directors do not anticipate that the adoption of these
standards, amendments and interpretations will have a material
impact on the Groups reported income or net assets in the
period of adoption.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments: Classification and
Measurement which is effective from January 1, 2013,
introduces new requirements for classifying and measuring
financial assets and for measuring financial liabilities at fair
value through profit or loss.
IAS 24 (amendment) Related Party Disclosures which
is effective from January 1, 2011, clarifies and simplifies
the definition of a related party.
IFRIC 14 (amendment) Prepayments of a Minimum Funding
Requirement which is effective from January 1, 2011
with retrospective application, permits an entity to treat the
prepayment of a minimum funding requirement as an asset.
IFRIC 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity
Instruments which is effective from July 1, 2010,
clarifies that equity instruments issued to a creditor to
extinguish a financial liability are measured at fair value with
any gain or loss recognized immediately in profit or loss.
IFRS 7 (amendment) Financial Instruments:
Disclosures, which is effective from January 1, 2011,
amends the credit risk disclosures for financial assets.
IFRIC 13 (amendment) Customer Loyalty Programmes,
which is effective from January 1, 2011, clarifies that
when the fair value of an award is measured based on redemption
value, the amount of discounts granted to customers not in the
loyalty program should be taken into account.
Note: the effective dates are in respect of accounting periods
beginning on or after the date shown and so will be effective
for the Group from January 1, 2011, other than IFRS 9 which
will be effective for the Group from January 1, 2013.
F-22
|
|
Note 2
|
Exchange
Rates and Segmental Information
|
Exchange
Rates
The results of operations have been translated into US dollars
at the average rates of exchange for the year. In the case of
sterling, the translation rate is $1 = £0.65 (2009 $1 =
£0.64, 2008 $1 = £0.55). In the case of the euro, the
translation rate is $1 = 0.76 (2009 $1 = 0.72, 2008
$1 = 0.68).
Assets and liabilities have been translated into US dollars at
the rates of exchange on the last day of the year. In the case
of sterling, the translation rate is $1 = £0.64 (2009 $1 =
£0.62, 2008 $1 = £0.69). In the case of the euro, the
translation rate is $1 = 0.75 (2009 $1 = 0.69, 2008
$1 = 0.71).
Segmental
Information
The management of the Groups operations, excluding Central
functions, is organized within three geographical regions:
Americas;
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA); and
Asia Pacific.
These, together with Central functions, comprise the
Groups four reportable segments.
The Asia Pacific reportable segment comprises the aggregation of
two operating segments, Greater China and Asia Australasia.
Central functions include costs of global functions, including
technology, sales and marketing, finance, human resources and
corporate services; revenue arises principally from technology
fee income. Central liabilities include the loyalty program
liability and the cumulative short-term System Fund surplus.
Each of the geographical regions derives its revenues from
either franchising, managing or owning hotels and additional
segmental disclosures are provided accordingly.
Management monitors the operating results of the geographical
regions and Central functions separately for the purpose of
making decisions about resource allocation and performance
assessment. Segmental performance is evaluated based on
operating profit or loss and is measured consistently with
operating profit or loss in the Consolidated Financial
Statements, excluding exceptional items. Group financing and
income taxes are managed on a group basis and are not allocated
to reportable segments.
F-23
Segmental
Information
Year
ended December 31, 2010
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
Central
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue*
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segmental
result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Regional and central
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable segments operating profit
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
444
|
|
Exceptional operating items (Note 5)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit*
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Reportable segments operating profit
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
Exceptional operating items
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
Net finance costs
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before tax
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Relates to continuing operations.
|
F-24
Year
ended December 31, 2010
Assets
and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
2,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Current tax receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment liabilities
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
|
|
(1,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Loans and other borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,507
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
segmental information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Capital expenditure (see below)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onerous management contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization(i)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Share-based payments cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Included in the $108 million
of depreciation and amortization is $31 million relating to
administrative expenses and $77 million relating to cost of
sales.
|
Reconciliation
of capital expenditure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Capital expenditure per management reporting
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Management contract acquired on disposal
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Timing differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure per the financial statements
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprising additions to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
Segmental
Information
Year
ended December 31, 2009
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
Central
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue*
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segmental
result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Regional and central
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable segments operating profit
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
363
|
|
Exceptional operating items (Note 5)
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss*
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Reportable segments operating profit
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
Exceptional operating items
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Net finance costs
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before tax
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Tax
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Relates to continuing operations.
|
F-26
Year
ended December 31, 2009
Assets
and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Current tax receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment liabilities
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
(1,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Loans and other borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,737
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
segmental information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Capital expenditure (see below)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onerous management contracts
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization(i)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Share-based payments costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Included in the $109 million
of depreciation and amortization is $29 million relating to
administrative expenses and $80 million relating to cost of
sales.
|
Reconciliation
of capital expenditure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Capital expenditure per management reporting
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Timing differences
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure per the financial statements
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprising additions to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Investment in associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
Segmental
Information
Year
ended December 31, 2008
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
Central
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue*
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segmental
result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Franchised
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Owned and leased
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Regional and central
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable segments operating profit
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
549
|
|
Exceptional operating items (Note 5)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit*
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Reportable segments operating profit
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
Exceptional operating items
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Net finance costs
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before tax
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Relates to continuing operations.
|
F-28
Year
ended December 31, 2008
Other
segmental information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Central
|
|
Group
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Capital expenditure (see below)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization(i)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Share-based payments costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Included in the $112 million
of depreciation and amortization is $32 million relating to
administrative expenses and $80 million relating to cost of
sales.
|
Geographical
information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
United States
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Rest of World
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue per Consolidated income statement
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the purposes of the above table, hotel revenue is determined
according to the location of the hotel and other revenue is
attributed to the country of origin. In addition to the United
Kingdom, revenue relating to an individual country is separately
disclosed when it represents 10% or more of total revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
United States
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
805
|
|
France
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Peoples Republic of China (including Hong Kong)
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
Rest of World
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
2,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the purposes of the above table, non-current assets comprise
property, plant and equipment, goodwill, intangible assets and
investments in associates. Non-current assets relating to an
individual country are separately disclosed when they represent
10% or more of total non-current assets, as defined above.
F-29
|
|
Note 3
|
Staff
costs and Directors emoluments
|
With regards to this note,
pages F-30
to F-35 and
F-44 to
F-48 are
audited. Pages
F-36 to
F-43 are
unaudited.
Staff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wages and salaries
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
Social security costs
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Pension and other post-retirement benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Defined contribution plans
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of employees, including part-time employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Number)
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
3,309
|
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
3,384
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
Central
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,858
|
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
|
|
7,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The costs of the above employees are borne by IHG. In addition,
the Group employs 4,489 (2009 4,561, 2008 4,353) people who work
in managed hotels or directly on behalf of the System Fund and
whose costs of $282 million (2009 $267 million, 2008
$272 million) are borne by those hotels or by the Fund.
Retirement
benefits
Retirement and death in service benefits are provided for
eligible Group employees in the United Kingdom principally by
the InterContinental Hotels UK Pension Plan. The plan, which is
funded and HM Revenue & Customs registered, covers
approximately 500 (2009 460, 2008 460) employees, of which
140 (2009 150, 2008 170) are in the defined benefit section
which provides pensions based on final salaries and 360 (2009
310, 2008 290) are in the defined contribution section. The
defined benefit section of the plan closed to new entrants
during 2002 with new members provided with defined contribution
arrangements. The assets of the plan are held in
self-administered trust funds separate from the Groups
assets. In addition, there are unfunded UK pension arrangements
for certain members affected by the lifetime allowance. The
Group also maintains the following US-based defined benefit
plans; the funded InterContinental Hotels Pension Plan, unfunded
InterContinental Hotels non-qualified pension plans and
post-employment benefits schemes. These plans are now closed to
new members. The Group also operates a number of minor pension
schemes outside the United Kingdom, the most significant of
which is a defined contribution scheme in the United States;
there is no material difference between the pension costs of,
and contributions to, these schemes.
F-30
In respect of the defined benefit plans, the amounts recognized
in the Consolidated income statement, in administrative
expenses, are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans
|
|
employment
|
|
|
|
|
UK
|
|
US and other
|
|
benefits
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Current service costs
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional items
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Exceptional items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 23, 2009, approval was given for the payment of
enhanced pension transfers to those deferred members of the
InterContinental Hotels UK Pension Plan who had accepted an
offer to receive the enhancement either as a cash lump sum or as
an additional transfer value to an alternative pension provider.
The payments, comprising lump sum amounts of
£5.9 million and additional contributions of
£4.3 million, were made by the Group in the first
quarter of 2009. The transfer values subsequently paid by the
plan were £45 million and the corresponding IAS19
liability extinguished was £38 million. The settlement
loss arising of £7 million (being the $11 million
exceptional item above), together with the lump sum payment and
costs of arrangement, was charged to the Consolidated income
statement as an exceptional item in 2009 (see Note 5).
The amounts recognized in the Consolidated statement of
comprehensive income are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans
|
|
employment
|
|
|
|
|
UK
|
|
US and other
|
|
benefits
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Less: expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Other actuarial (losses)/gains
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total actuarial (losses)/gains
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Change in asset restriction and liability in respect of funding
commitments*
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Relates to tax that would be
deducted at source in respect of a refund of the surplus taking
into account amounts payable under funding commitments.
|
F-31
The assets and liabilities of the schemes and the amounts
recognized in the Consolidated statement of financial position
are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans
|
|
employment
|
|
|
|
|
UK
|
|
US and other
|
|
benefits
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Retirement benefit assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
Present value of benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surplus in schemes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Asset restriction*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Present value of benefit obligations
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit in schemes
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
Asset restriction and liability in respect of funding
commitments*
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total present value of benefit obligations
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
(461
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
(678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Relates to tax that would be
deducted at source in respect of a refund of the surplus taking
into account amounts payable under funding commitments.
|
The US and other surplus of $5 million (2009
$4 million) relates to a defined benefit pension scheme in
Hong Kong. Included within the US and other deficit
is $2 million (2009 $1 million) relating to a defined
benefit pension plan in the Netherlands.
Assumptions
The principal financial assumptions used by the actuaries to
determine the benefit obligation are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans
|
|
Post-employment
|
|
|
UK
|
|
US
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Wages and salaries increases
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Pensions increases
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Inflation rate
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
-Pre 65 (ultimate rate reached in 2021)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Post 65 (ultimate rate reached in 2023)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate rate that the cost trend rate trends to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortality is the most significant demographic assumption. The
current assumptions for the UK plans are based on the S1NA
tables with long cohort projections and a one percent per annum
underpin to future mortality improvements with age rated down by
1.75 years for pensioners and 1.5 years for
non-pensioners. In the United States, the current assumptions
are based on the RP-2000 IRS PPA@ 2011 Non-Annuitant/Annuitant
healthy tables, for males and females.
F-32
In both territories, the assumptions have been revised during
the year to reflect increased life expectancy at retirement age
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans
|
|
|
UK
|
|
US
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
Current pensioners at 65
male(i)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Current pensioners at 65
female(i)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Future pensioners at 65
male(ii)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Future pensioners at 65
female(ii)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Relates to assumptions based on
longevity (in years) following retirement at the end of the
reporting period.
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Relates to assumptions based on
longevity (in years) relating to an employee retiring in 2030.
|
The assumptions allow for expected increases in longevity.
Sensitivities
The value of plan assets is sensitive to market conditions,
particularly equity values. Changes in assumptions used for
determining retirement benefit costs and obligations may have a
material impact on the income statement and the consolidated
statement of financial position. The main assumptions are the
discount rate, the rate of inflation and the assumed mortality
rate. The following table provides an estimate of the potential
impact of each of these variables on the principal pension plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK
|
|
US
|
|
|
Higher/
|
|
Increase/
|
|
Higher/
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
(lower)
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
(lower)
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
pension cost
|
|
in liabilities
|
|
pension cost
|
|
in liabilities
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Discount rate 0.25% decrease
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Discount rate 0.25% increase
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(25.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
Inflation rate 0.25% increase
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation rate 0.25% decrease
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(24.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortality rate one year increase
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A one percentage point increase/(decrease) in assumed healthcare
costs trend rate would increase/(decrease) the accumulated
post-employment benefit obligations as of December 31,
2010, by approximately $2.5 million (2009
$1.6 million, 2008 $1.7 million).
F-33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans
|
|
employment
|
|
|
|
|
UK
|
|
US and other
|
|
benefits
|
|
Total
|
Movement in benefit obligation
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Benefit obligation at January 1,
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
Current service cost
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Members contributions
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Enhanced pension transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Actuarial loss/(gain) arising in the year
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Exchange adjustments
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at December 31,
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprising:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded plans
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
Unfunded plans
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans
|
|
employment
|
|
|
|
|
UK
|
|
US and other
|
|
benefits
|
|
Total
|
Movement in plan assets
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at January 1,
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Members contributions
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Enhanced pension transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Actuarial (loss)/gain arising in the year
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange adjustments
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at December 31,
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funding
commitments
The most recent actuarial valuation of the InterContinental
Hotels UK Pension Plan was carried out as at March 31, 2009
and showed a deficit of £129 million on a funding
basis. Under the recovery plan agreed with the trustees, the
Group aims to eliminate this deficit by March 2017 through
additional Company contributions of up to £100 million
and projected investment returns. The agreed additional
contributions comprise three annual payments of
£10 million; £10 million was paid in August
2010 and two further payments of £10 million are due
on or before July 31, 2011 and 2012, together with further
payments related to the disposal of hotels (7.5% of net sales
proceeds) and growth in the Groups EBITDA above specified
targets. If required in 2017, a
top-up
payment will be made to bring the total additional contributions
up to £100 million. The Plan is formally valued every
three years and future valuations could lead to changes in the
amounts payable beyond March 2012.
Company contributions are expected to be $41 million in
2011, including known UK additional contributions of
£14 million with further amounts payable if there are
any hotel disposals.
F-34
The combined assets of the principal plans and expected rate of
return are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
|
rate of
|
|
|
|
rate of
|
|
|
|
rate of
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
expected
|
|
Value
|
|
expected
|
|
Value
|
|
expected
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
($ million)
|
|
(%)
|
|
($ million)
|
|
(%)
|
|
($ million)
|
|
UK pension plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability matching investment funds
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Hedge funds
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total market value of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US pension plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total market value of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected overall rates of return on assets, being 5.9% (2009
6.2%, 2008 5.5%) for the UK plans and 7.5% (2009 8.0%, 2008
8.0%) for the US plans, have been determined following advice
from the plans independent actuaries and are based on the
expected return on each asset class together with consideration
of the long-term asset strategy.
History of experience gains and losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK pension plans
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
Present value of benefit obligations
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
(461
|
)
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
|
|
(585
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Deficit)/surplus in the plans
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experience adjustments arising on plan liabilities
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experience adjustments arising on plan assets
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US and other pension plans
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Present value of benefit obligations
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit in the plans
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experience adjustments arising on plan liabilities
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experience adjustments arising on plan assets
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US post-employment benefits
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Present value of benefit obligations
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experience adjustments arising on plan liabilities
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
The cumulative amount of net actuarial losses recognized since
January 1, 2004 in the Consolidated statement of
comprehensive income is $253 million (2009
$208 million, 2008 $150 million). The Group is unable
to determine how much of the pension scheme deficit recognized
on transition to IFRS of $298 million and taken directly to
total equity is attributable to actuarial gains and losses since
inception of the schemes. Therefore, the Group is unable to
determine the amount of actuarial gains and losses that would
have been recognized in the Consolidated statement of
comprehensive income before January 1, 2004.
Unaudited
information on Directors emoluments
Policy
on remuneration of Executive Directors and senior
executives
Remuneration
policy and structure
IHGs overall remuneration is intended to:
|
|
|
|
|
attract and retain high-quality executives in an environment
where compensation is based on global market practice;
|
|
|
|
drive aligned focus of the senior executive team and reward the
achievement of strategic objectives;
|
|
|
|
align rewards of executives with returns to shareholders;
|
|
|
|
support equitable treatment between members of the same
executive team; and
|
|
|
|
facilitate global assignments and relocation.
|
The Remuneration Committee believes that it is important to
reward management, including the Executive Directors, for
targets achieved, provided those targets are stretching and
aligned with shareholders interests.
IHGs remuneration structure for senior executives places a
strong emphasis on performance-related reward. The individual
elements are designed to provide the appropriate balance between
fixed remuneration and variable risk reward,
linked to both the performance of the Group and the achievements
of the individual. Approximately two-thirds of variable reward
is delivered in the form of shares, to enhance alignment with
shareholders.
In reaching its decisions, the Remuneration Committee takes into
account a number of factors, including the relationship between
remuneration and risk, strategic direction and affordability.
Performance-related measures are chosen to ensure a strong link
between reward and underlying financial and operational
performance.
Summarized below are the individual elements of remuneration
provided to Executive Directors and other Executive Committee
members, including the purpose of each element. For variable
incentive plans, the plan measures and link to Group strategic
objectives are also included.
F-36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element
|
|
Maximum value
|
|
Purpose
|
|
Measures and link to strategic objectives
|
|
Base Salary (cash)
|
|
n/a
|
|
Recognizes the market value of the role and the
individuals skill, performance and experience
|
|
n/a
|
Annual Bonus (one-half cash and one-half deferred shares)
|
|
200% of base
salary(1)
|
|
Drives and rewards annual performance of individuals and teams against both financial and non-financial metrics
Aligns individual employee objectives with those of the Group
Aligns short-term annual performance with long-term returns to shareholders
|
|
Group earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) Provides focus on earnings growth, driven by core operating inputs, namely rooms growth, RevPAR, royalty fees and profit margins
Individual Overall Performance Rating (OPR) Provides focus on key performance objectives (KPOs) and leadership competencies relative to the individual role. KPOs are linked to strategic priorities, notably:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Returns deliver budget and growth targets (EBIT, system size, margin, overheads)
Our People employee engagement survey results
Guest Experience deliver brand performance targets (guest satisfaction, market share)
Responsible Business continue hotel roll-out and adoption of Green Engage sustainability management system
|
Long Term Incentive Plan (shares)
|
|
205% of base
salary(2)
|
|
Drives and rewards delivery of sustained long-term
performance on measures that are aligned with the interests of
shareholders
|
|
Total shareholder return (TSR) growth relative to Dow Jones World Hotels index Aligned with our Vision to become one of the worlds great companies by creating Great Hotels Guests Love
Net Rooms growth relative to major competitors(3)
Aligned with Where we compete, supporting our business model, segment and market strategies to grow system size
Like-for-like revenue per available room (RevPAR) growth relative to major competitors(3)
Aligned with How we win, reflecting the power of our brands, scale and experience, and engaged workforce
|
Pension and benefits (varied)
|
|
n/a
|
|
Provides a competitive level of benefits, including
short-term protection and long-term savings opportunities
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Combined Annual Bonus award (cash
and shares) was subject to a temporary maximum cap of 175% of
base salary in 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Until 2009, maximum awards were
normally granted at 270% of salary.
|
|
(3)
|
|
As outlined on
page F-40,
from 2011, earnings per share (EPS) is replaced by
net Rooms growth and RevPAR growth in the LTIP.
|
F-37
The normal policy for all Executive Directors and Executive
Committee members is that their target performance-related
incentives will equate to approximately 70% of total annual
remuneration (excluding pensions and benefits).
The Remuneration Committee also reviews the balance of fixed and
variable remuneration provided to the wider management
population, to ensure these are appropriate given relativities
to the Executive Directors and to market practice.
The Company recognizes that its Executive Directors may be
invited to become Non-Executive Directors of other companies and
that such duties can broaden experience and knowledge, and
benefit the Company. Executive Directors are, therefore,
permitted to accept one non-executive appointment (in addition
to any positions where the Director is appointed as the
Groups representative), subject to Board approval, as long
as this is not, in the reasonable opinion of the Board, likely
to lead to a conflict of interest. Executive Directors are
generally authorized to retain the fees received. Current
Executive Directors hold no Non-Executive Directorships of other
companies.
Base
salary and benefits
The salary for each Executive Director is reviewed annually and
is based on both individual performance and relevant competitive
market data. Base salary is the only element of remuneration
which is pensionable. In addition, benefits are provided to
Executive Directors in accordance with local market practice.
In assessing levels of pay and benefits, IHG analyzes those
offered by different groups of comparator companies. These
groups are chosen having regard to participants:
|
|
|
|
|
size market capitalization, turnover, profits and
the number of people employed;
|
|
|
|
diversity and complexity of business;
|
|
|
|
geographical spread of business; and
|
|
|
|
relevance to the hotel industry.
|
Internal relativities and Group-wide remuneration approaches are
also taken into account. The Remuneration Committee reviews
average base salary levels and average salary increase
percentages for the broader IHG workforce.
Executive Directors annual base salaries are shown in the
table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Salary
|
|
2010 Salary
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
|
£850,780
|
|
|
|
£826,000
|
|
James Abrahamson
|
|
|
£477,117
|
*
|
|
|
£469,348
|
|
Kirk Kinsell
|
|
|
£477,117
|
*
|
|
|
£462,875
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
£540,000
|
|
|
|
£523,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Messrs Abrahamson and Kinsell are
paid in US dollars. James Abrahamsons annual base salary
for 2010 was $725,000 and for 2011 is $737,000. Kirk
Kinsells annual base salary for 2010 was $715,000 and for
2011 is $737,000. The sterling values in the table above have
been calculated using an exchange rate of $1= £0.65.
|
Annual
Bonus Plan (ABP)
Structure
and outcomes in 2010
Awards under the ABP require the achievement of challenging
performance goals before bonus is payable. Achievement of target
performance results in a bonus of 115% of salary. Half of any
bonus earned is compulsorily deferred in the form of shares for
three years. No matching shares are awarded by the Company.
Awards under the ABP are linked to individual performance and
EBIT. Individual performance is measured by the achievement of
specific KPOs linked directly to the Groups strategic
objectives, a selection of which is set out in the table on page
F-37, and an assessment against leadership competencies and
behaviors.
F-38
Each year, specific quantitative targets are set for each
Executive Director and Executive Committee member, as relevant
to their role. Performance is reviewed at the end of each year
to determine an OPR. The OPR determines 30% of the bonus outcome.
EBIT performance determines 70% of the bonus outcome. In 2010,
under the financial measure (EBIT), threshold payout was 90% of
target performance, with maximum payout at 120% or more of
target. Payout for individual performance would be reduced by
half if EBIT performance was below threshold. In addition, no
annual bonus would be payable on any measure if EBIT performance
was lower than 85% of target.
The maximum result for each measure is double its target value.
However the combined payout result of the two measures was
capped at 175% of base salary.
The 2010 EBIT result was 159%, resulting in a maximum combined
payout for all Directors, as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout as % of salary
|
|
Measure
|
|
Key performance indicator
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Max
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
EBIT (70%)
|
|
|
80.5
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Individual
|
|
OPR (30%)
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Total for 2010
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
175
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual 2010 result as % of salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
|
175
|
|
James Abrahamson
|
|
|
175
|
|
Kirk Kinsell
|
|
|
175
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Combined EBIT and OPR payout
subject to a maximum of 175% of base salary.
|
Structure
in 2011
The Annual Bonus structure remains largely unchanged in 2011
with awards under the ABP continuing to require the achievement
of challenging EBIT goals before target bonus is payable.
For 2011, the maximum bonus opportunity for the Executive
Directors will revert to 200% of salary. Under the financial
measure, the EBIT threshold for payout remains at 90% of target
performance. However, maximum payout will revert to 110% or more
of target.
As with previous years, the achievement of target performance
will result in a bonus of 115% of salary. Half of any bonus
earned will be deferred in the form of shares for three years.
Payout for individual performance will be reduced by half if
EBIT performance is below threshold, and no annual bonus will be
payable on any measure if EBIT performance is lower than 85% of
target.
Long
Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
The LTIP allows Executive Directors and eligible management
employees to receive share awards, subject to the achievement of
performance conditions set by the Remuneration Committee,
measured over a three-year period. Awards are made annually and,
other than in exceptional circumstances, will not exceed three
times annual salary for Executive Directors.
Structure
for 2010/2012 cycle
For the 2010/2012 cycle awards were made at 205% of base salary.
The performance conditions for the cycle are:
|
|
|
|
|
IHGs TSR relative to the Dow Jones World Hotels index (50%
weighting); and
|
|
|
|
growth in adjusted EPS over the period (50% weighting).
|
F-39
Awards under the LTIP lapse if performance conditions are not
met there is no re-testing. Performance conditions
for all outstanding awards are shown in the table on
page F-41.
Structure
for 2011/2013 cycle
For the 2011/2013 cycle, maximum award levels will remain at
205% of base salary. The Remuneration Committee believes
relative TSR is well aligned with the goal of achieving enduring
top quartile returns and so TSR will continue to retain a 50%
weighting in the LTIP.
Furthermore, the Remuneration Committee concluded that the LTIP
can be better aligned with IHGs strategy by replacing EPS
with two equally weighted relative growth measures, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
25% of the maximum award will be based on cumulative annual
growth of net Rooms; and
|
|
|
|
25% of the maximum award will be based on cumulative annual
like-for-like
RevPAR growth.
|
Growth in both Rooms and RevPAR will be measured on a relative
basis against a comparator group of the major globally-branded
competitors: Accor, Choice, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, Starwood
and Wyndham.
Threshold vesting will occur if IHGs TSR growth is equal
to the Dow Jones World Hotels index. Maximum vesting will occur
if IHGs TSR growth exceeds the index by 8% or more.
In setting the TSR performance target, the Remuneration
Committee has taken into account a range of factors, including
IHGs strategic plans, historical performance of the
industry and FTSE 100 market practice.
For both Rooms growth and RevPAR measures, threshold vesting
will occur if IHG performance at least equals the average of the
comparator group. Maximum vesting for either measure will only
occur if IHG is ranked first in the comparator group. Vesting
for points between threshold and maximum will be calculated on a
straight-line basis.
The vesting range and weighting for each measure is set out in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Weighting
|
|
% of award vesting
|
|
20%
|
|
100%
|
|
|
TSR relative to Dow Jones World Hotels index
|
|
Match index
|
|
Index + 8% per annum
|
|
50%
|
Net Rooms growth relative to comparator group
|
|
Average
|
|
1st
position
|
|
25%
|
RevPAR growth relative to comparator group
|
|
Average
|
|
1st
position
|
|
25%
|
After testing the performance conditions set on grant, the
Remuneration Committee will review the vesting outcomes of the
Rooms and RevPAR measures against an assessment of earnings and
quality of the financial performance of the Company over the
period. The Remuneration Committee may reduce the number of
shares which vest if they determine such an adjustment is
appropriate. IHGs performance and vesting outcomes will be
fully disclosed and explained in the relevant Remuneration
Report.
F-40
Outcomes
in 2010 and progress on all current LTIP cycles
The specific vesting performance conditions and position as at
December 31, 2010 for all conditional LTIP awards made
between 2008 and 2010 are set out in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome/
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Threshold(1)
|
|
Maximum(1)
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
current
|
Performance measure
|
|
performance
|
|
performance
|
|
vesting
|
|
vesting
|
|
Weighting
|
|
award
|
|
position
|
|
2008/2010 cycle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSR
|
|
Growth equal to the index
|
|
Growth exceeds the index by 8% or more
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
135
|
%
|
|
Growth outperformance of 8.0%
|
EPS
|
|
Growth of 6% per annum
|
|
Growth of 16% per annum or more
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
135
|
%
|
|
Growth of 9.6% per annum
|
Total Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.8% of maximum award
|
2009/2011
cycle(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSR
|
|
Growth equal to the index
|
|
Growth exceeds the index by 8% or more
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
66.7
|
%
|
|
|
102.5
|
%
|
|
Growth outperformance of 6.1%
|
EPS
|
|
Growth of 0% per annum
|
|
Growth of 10% per annum or more
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
|
102.5
|
%
|
|
Growth of -1.0% per annum
|
2010/2012
cycle(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSR
|
|
Growth equal to the index
|
|
Growth exceeds the index by 8% or more
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
102.5
|
%
|
|
Growth outperformance of -5.4%
|
EPS
|
|
Growth of 5% per annum
|
|
Growth of 15% per annum or more
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
102.5
|
%
|
|
Growth of 26% per annum
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Vesting between threshold and
maximum occurs on a straight-line basis.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Two years of cycle completed.
|
|
(3)
|
|
One year of cycle completed.
|
Shareholding
policy
Share
ownership
The Remuneration Committee believes that share ownership by
Executive Directors and senior executives strengthens the link
between the individuals personal interests and those of
the shareholders. Executive Directors are expected to hold twice
their base salary in shares, or three times in the case of the
Chief Executive. Executives are expected to hold all shares
earned (net of any share sales required to meet personal tax
liabilities) until their shareholding requirement is achieved.
Executive
share options
From 2006, executive share options have not formed part of the
Companys remuneration structure. Details of prior share
option grants are given on page F-48.
Share
capital
No awards or grants over shares were made during 2010 that would
be dilutive of the Companys ordinary share capital.
Current policy is to settle the majority of awards or grants
under the Companys share plans with shares purchased in
the market. A number of options granted up to 2005 are yet to be
exercised and will be settled with the issue of new shares.
F-41
The following table shows the guideline and actual shareholdings
of the Executive Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guideline
|
|
Actual shareholding
|
|
|
shareholding
|
|
at Dec 31, 2010
|
|
|
as % of salary
|
|
as % of
salary(1)
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
James
Abrahamson(2)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Kirk
Kinsell(2)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Based on share price of 1,243 pence
per share as at December 31, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Shareholding requirement took
effect upon appointment to the Board on August 1, 2010.
|
Policy
regarding pensions
Andrew Cosslett, Richard Solomons and other senior UK-based
executives participate on the same basis in the executive
section of the registered defined benefit InterContinental
Hotels UK Pension Plan and, if appropriate, the InterContinental
Executive
Top-Up
Scheme (ICETUS). The latter is an unfunded
arrangement, but with appropriate security provided via a fixed
charge on a hotel asset. As an alternative to these unfunded
arrangements, a cash allowance may be taken. Following recent
changes to UK pensions legislation, the pension provision is
under review. This Plan is now closed to new entrants.
James Abrahamson, Kirk Kinsell and other senior US-based
executives participate in US retirement benefit plans.
Executives outside the United Kingdom and United States
participate in the InterContinental Hotels Group International
Savings and Retirement Plan or other local plans.
Non-Executive
Directors pay policy and structure
Non-Executive Directors are paid a fee which is approved by the
Board, taking into account fees paid in other companies of a
similar complexity. These fees also reflect the time commitment
and responsibilities of the roles. Accordingly, higher fees are
payable to the Senior Independent Director who chairs the Audit
Committee and to the Chairmen of the Remuneration and Corporate
Responsibility Committees, reflecting the additional
responsibilities of these roles.
Non-Executive Directors fee levels are reviewed annually.
In the final quarter of 2010 an increase of 2% for the Chairman
and 3% for the Non-Executive Directors was agreed by the Board
to be effective from January 1, 2011. This increase is
broadly in line with anticipated salary increases for executive
and senior management employees across the wider organization.
The following table sets out the change in annual fee rates from
2010 to 2011 for the Non-Executive Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees at
|
|
|
Fees at
|
|
|
|
Role
|
|
Jan 1, 2011
|
|
|
Jan 1, 2010
|
|
|
David Webster
|
|
Chairman
|
|
£
|
406,000
|
|
|
£
|
398,000
|
|
David Kappler
|
|
Senior Independent Director &
Chairman of Audit Committee
|
|
£
|
103,000
|
|
|
£
|
99,750
|
|
Ralph Kugler
|
|
Chairman of Remuneration Committee
|
|
£
|
86,500
|
|
|
£
|
84,000
|
|
Jennifer Laing
|
|
Chairman of Corporate Responsibility Committee
|
|
£
|
76,000
|
|
|
£
|
73,500
|
|
Others
|
|
Non-Executive Director
|
|
£
|
65,000
|
|
|
£
|
63,000
|
|
F-42
Service
contracts
Policy
The Remuneration Committees policy is for Executive
Directors to have rolling contracts with a notice period of
12 months. Messrs. Cosslett, Abrahamson, Kinsell and
Solomons have service agreements with a notice period of
12 months. All new appointments are intended to have
12-month
notice periods. However, on occasion, to complete an external
recruitment successfully, a longer initial notice period
reducing to 12 months may be used, in accordance with the
Combined Code.
No provisions for compensation for termination following change
of control, nor for liquidated damages of any kind, are included
in the current Directors contracts. In the event of any
early termination of an Executive Directors contract, the
policy is to seek to minimize any liability.
Non-Executive Directors have letters of appointment. David
Websters appointment as Non-Executive Chairman, effective
from January 1, 2004, is subject to six months
notice. The dates of appointment of the other Non-Executive
Directors are set out on page 54.
All Directors appointments and subsequent reappointments
are subject to election and re-election by shareholders.
Biographies of each of the Directors and their main
responsibilities can be found on pages 54-56.
The Company announced on March 16, 2011 that Andrew
Cosslett will step down as Chief Executive on June 30, 2011
and will be succeeded by Richard Solomons. A Director since 2003
and currently Chief Financial Officer and Head of Commercial
Development, Richard Solomons will start in his new position as
Chief Executive on July 1, 2011.
Directors
contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
effective date
|
|
Notice period
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
|
February 3, 2005
|
|
|
|
3 months
|
|
James Abrahamson
|
|
|
August 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
12 months
|
|
Kirk Kinsell
|
|
|
August 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
12 months
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
April 15, 2003
|
|
|
|
12 months
|
|
Messrs Cosslett and Solomons signed a letter of appointment,
effective from completion of the June 2005 capital
reorganization of the Group, incorporating the same terms as
their original service agreements.
Richard Solomons signed a contract on March 16, 2011
relating to his employment as Chief Executive, effective from
July 1, 2011.
F-43
Audited
information on Directors emoluments
Directors
remuneration in 2010
The following table sets out the remuneration paid or payable to
the Directors in respect of the year to December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base salaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total emoluments
|
|
|
and fees
|
|
Performance
payments(1)
|
|
Benefits(2)
|
|
excluding pensions
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(£ thousand)
|
|
Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
James
Abrahamson(3)
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kirk
Kinsell(3)
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Webster
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Graham
Allan(4)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Kappler
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Ralph Kugler
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Jennifer
Laing(5)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Jonathan Linen
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Ying Yeh
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Former
Directors(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Performance payments comprise cash
payments in respect of participation in the ABP but exclude
bonus payments in deferred shares, details of which are set out
in the ABP table on page F-46. For James Abrahamson and
Kirk Kinsell, this also includes a cash payment in lieu of
dividends relating to share awards as outlined on page F-46.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Benefits incorporate all tax
assessable benefits arising from the individuals
employment. This includes, but is not limited to, benefits such
as the provision of a fully expensed company car, private
healthcare, financial counseling and other benefits as
applicable to the individuals work location. This includes
the cost of expatriate benefits related to Kirk Kinsells
international assignment.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Messrs. Abrahamson and Kinsell
were appointed as Directors on August 1, 2010. Base
salaries, performance payments and benefits have been pro-rated
from their date of appointment. James Abrahamsons
pro-rated base salary is $302,083 and Kirk Kinsells
pro-rated base salary is $297,917. Sterling values have been
calculated using an exchange rate of $1= £0.65.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Graham Allan was appointed as a
Director on January 1, 2010.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Jennifer Laings fee was
increased, pro rata, from March 1, 2009 when she became
Chairman of the Corporate Responsibility Committee.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Sir Ian Prosser retired as a
Director on December 31, 2003. However, he had an ongoing
healthcare benefit of £1,179 during the year.
|
F-44
Directors
pension benefits
The following information relates to the pension arrangements
provided for Messrs Cosslett and Solomons under the executive
section of the InterContinental Hotels UK Pension Plan (IC
Plan) and the unfunded ICETUS.
The executive section of the IC Plan is a funded, registered,
final salary, occupational pension scheme. The main features
applicable to the Executive Directors are:
|
|
|
|
|
a normal pension age of 60;
|
|
|
|
pension accrual of 1/30th of final pensionable salary for
each year of pensionable service;
|
|
|
|
life assurance cover of four times pensionable salary;
|
|
|
|
pensions payable in the event of ill health; and
|
|
|
|
spouses, partners and dependants pensions on
death.
|
When benefits would otherwise exceed a members lifetime
allowance under the post-April 2006 pensions regime, these
benefits are limited in the IC Plan, but the balance is provided
instead by ICETUS.
James Abrahamson has retirement benefits provided via the Six
Continents Hotels, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan
(DCP). Kirk Kinsell has retirement benefits provided
via the 401(k) Retirement Plan for employees of Six Continents
Hotels, Inc. (401(k)) and the DCP. The 401(k) is a
tax qualified plan providing benefits on a defined contribution
basis, with the member and the relevant company both
contributing. The DCP is a non-tax qualified plan, providing
benefits on a defined contribution basis, with the member and
the relevant company both contributing.
The following table sets out the pension benefits of the
Executive Directors in the final salary plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
transfer value
|
|
Absolute
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
Transfer value of
|
|
over the year,
|
|
increase in
|
|
Increase
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
|
|
contributions
|
|
accrued benefits
|
|
less Directors
|
|
accrued
|
|
in accrued
|
|
pension at
|
|
|
Age at
|
|
in the
year(1)
|
|
Jan 1, 2010
|
|
Dec 31, 2010
|
|
contributions
|
|
pension(2)
|
|
pension(3)
|
|
Dec 31,
2010(4)
|
Directors
|
|
Dec 31, 2010
|
|
(£)
|
|
(£)
|
|
(£)
|
|
(£)
|
|
(£ pa)
|
|
(£ pa)
|
|
(£ pa)
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
40,100
|
|
|
|
2,574,100
|
|
|
|
3,438,100
|
|
|
|
823,900
|
|
|
|
30,300
|
|
|
|
23,600
|
|
|
|
161,500
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
|
|
3,934,700
|
|
|
|
4,708,400
|
|
|
|
748,200
|
|
|
|
21,500
|
|
|
|
10,400
|
|
|
|
239,200
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Contributions paid in the year by
the Directors under the terms of the plans. Contributions were
5% of full pensionable salary.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The absolute increase in accrued
pension during the year.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The increase in accrued pension
during the year, excluding any increase for inflation.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Accrued pension is that which would
be paid annually on retirement at 60, based on service to
December 31, 2010.
|
Contributions made by and in respect of James Abrahamson and
Kirk Kinsell in the defined contributions plans are*:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age at
|
|
Directors
|
|
Directors
|
|
Company
|
|
Company
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
contributions to
|
|
contributions to
|
|
contribution to
|
|
contribution to
|
|
|
2010
|
|
DCP in the year
|
|
401(k) in the year
|
|
DCP in the year
|
|
401(k) in the year
|
|
|
|
|
(£)
|
|
(£)
|
|
(£)
|
|
(£)
|
|
James Abrahamson
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kirk Kinsell
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
22,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Messrs. Abrahamson and Kinsell
were appointed as Directors on August 1, 2010. Pension
contributions have been pro-rated from their date of
appointment. Sterling values have been calculated using an
exchange rate of $1 = £0.65.
|
F-45
Annual
Bonus Plan deferred share awards
All Directors participated in the ABP during the year ended
December 31, 2010. No matching shares are provided on
awards. Directors pre-tax share interests during the year
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
based on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share
|
|
|
Financial year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
ABP
|
|
|
|
price of
|
|
|
on which
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
price
|
|
ABP shares
|
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
|
awards
|
|
|
|
1,243 pence
|
|
|
performance
|
|
ABP awards
|
|
ABP awards
|
|
|
|
per share
|
|
vested
|
|
|
|
per share
|
|
Value
|
|
held at
|
|
Planned
|
|
at Dec 31,
|
|
|
is based for
|
|
held at
|
|
during
|
|
Award
|
|
at award
|
|
during
|
|
Vesting
|
|
at vesting
|
|
at vesting
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
vesting
|
|
2010
|
Directors
|
|
award*
|
|
Jan 1, 2010
|
|
the year
|
|
date
|
|
(pence)
|
|
the year
|
|
date
|
|
(pence)
|
|
(£)
|
|
2010
|
|
date
|
|
(£)
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
55,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.26.07
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
55,870
|
|
|
|
2.26.10
|
|
|
|
914.66
|
|
|
|
511,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
71,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.25.08
|
|
|
|
819.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,287
|
|
|
|
2.25.11
|
|
|
|
886,097
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
104,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.23.09
|
|
|
|
472.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,652
|
|
|
|
2.23.12
|
|
|
|
1,300,824
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,186,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Abrahamson
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kirk Kinsell
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.26.07
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
2.26.10
|
|
|
|
914.66
|
|
|
|
124,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
19,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.25.08
|
|
|
|
819.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,731
|
|
|
|
2.25.11
|
|
|
|
245,256
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
41,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.23.09
|
|
|
|
472.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,427
|
|
|
|
2.23.12
|
|
|
|
514,938
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
35,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.26.07
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
35,757
|
|
|
|
2.26.10
|
|
|
|
914.66
|
|
|
|
327,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
45,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.25.08
|
|
|
|
819.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,634
|
|
|
|
2.25.11
|
|
|
|
567,231
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
66,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.23.09
|
|
|
|
472.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,549
|
|
|
|
2.23.12
|
|
|
|
827,204
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,394,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
For financial year 2006, the award
was based on EPS and EBIT measures and total shares held include
matching shares. For financial year 2007, the award was based on
Group EBIT and net annual rooms additions measures and total
shares held include matching shares. For financial year 2008,
the award was based on Group EBIT, net annual rooms additions
and individual performance measures. No matching shares were
awarded. For financial year 2009, no bonus was paid.
|
Special
share award
James Abrahamson received a special share award which vests over
three years as part of his recruitment terms in 2009. Vesting
each year is subject to continued service. The details are set
out below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
based on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
price of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
price
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
1,243 pence
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
per share
|
|
vested
|
|
|
|
per share
|
|
Value
|
|
held at
|
|
Planned
|
|
at Dec 31,
|
|
|
held at
|
|
Award
|
|
at award
|
|
during
|
|
Vesting
|
|
at vesting
|
|
at vesting
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
vesting
|
|
2010
|
Director
|
|
Jan 1, 2010
|
|
date
|
|
(pence)
|
|
the year
|
|
date
|
|
(pence)
|
|
(£)
|
|
2010
|
|
date
|
|
(£)
|
|
James Abrahamson
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
2.23.09
|
|
|
|
454.25
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
2.17.10
|
|
|
|
900.07
|
|
|
|
405,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
2.23.09
|
|
|
|
454.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
2.16.11
|
|
|
|
559,350
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
2.23.09
|
|
|
|
454.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
2.15.12
|
|
|
|
559,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,118,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
Long
Term Incentive Plan awards
The awards made in respect of cycles ending on December 31,
2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 and the maximum pre-tax number of
ordinary shares due if performance targets are achieved in full
are set out in the table below. In respect of the cycle ending
December 31, 2009, 46% of the award vested on
February 17, 2010. In respect of the cycle ending on
December 31, 2010, the Company outperformed the Dow Jones
World Hotels index in TSR by 8 percentage points and achieved
9.6% per annum adjusted EPS growth. Accordingly, 73.8% of the
award vested on February 16, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
based on
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share
|
|
|
to which
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
price of
|
|
|
performance
|
|
Maximum
|
|
LTIP shares
|
|
|
|
price
|
|
LTIP shares
|
|
price
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP awards
|
|
1,243 pence
|
|
|
is based
|
|
LTIP awards
|
|
awarded
|
|
|
|
per share
|
|
vested
|
|
per share
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
held at
|
|
at Dec 31,
|
|
|
for award
|
|
held at
|
|
during
|
|
Award
|
|
at award
|
|
during
|
|
at vesting
|
|
at vesting
|
|
Vesting
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
2010
|
Directors
|
|
(Dec
31,)(1)
|
|
Jan 1, 2010
|
|
the year
|
|
date
|
|
(pence)
|
|
the year
|
|
(pence)
|
|
(£)
|
|
date
|
|
2010
|
|
(£)
|
|
Andrew Cosslett
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
159,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.07
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
73,372
|
(2)
|
|
|
901.5
|
|
|
|
661,449
|
|
|
|
2.17.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
253,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.19.08
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.16.11
|
|
|
|
253,559
|
|
|
|
3,151,738
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
272,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.09
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.15.12
|
|
|
|
272,201
|
|
|
|
3,383,458
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,807
|
|
|
|
4.8.10
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.13.13
|
|
|
|
160,807
|
|
|
|
1,998,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685,266
|
|
|
|
160,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686,567
|
|
|
|
8,534,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Abrahamson
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
82,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.23.09
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
37,943
|
(2)
|
|
|
901.5
|
|
|
|
342,056
|
|
|
|
2.17.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
164,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.23.09
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.16.11
|
|
|
|
164,973
|
|
|
|
2,050,614
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
138,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.09
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.15.12
|
|
|
|
138,730
|
|
|
|
1,724,414
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,008
|
|
|
|
4.8.10
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.13.13
|
|
|
|
79,008
|
|
|
|
982,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,189
|
|
|
|
79,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382,711
|
|
|
|
4,757,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kirk Kinsell
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
30,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.07
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
13,871
|
(2)
|
|
|
901.5
|
|
|
|
125,047
|
|
|
|
2.17.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
16,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.12.07
|
|
|
|
961.5
|
|
|
|
7,814
|
(2)
|
|
|
901.5
|
|
|
|
70,443
|
|
|
|
2.17.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
84,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.19.08
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.16.11
|
|
|
|
84,397
|
|
|
|
1,049,055
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
132,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.09
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.15.12
|
|
|
|
132,256
|
|
|
|
1,643,942
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,411
|
|
|
|
4.8.10
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.13.13
|
|
|
|
75,411
|
|
|
|
937,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,796
|
|
|
|
75,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292,064
|
|
|
|
3,630,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
102,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.07
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
46,970
|
(2)
|
|
|
901.5
|
|
|
|
423,435
|
|
|
|
2.17.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
161,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.19.08
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.16.11
|
|
|
|
161,241
|
|
|
|
2,004,226
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
173,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.09
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.15.12
|
|
|
|
173,096
|
|
|
|
2,151,583
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,818
|
|
|
|
4.8.10
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.13.13
|
|
|
|
101,818
|
|
|
|
1,265,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436,446
|
|
|
|
101,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436,155
|
|
|
|
5,421,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
All details of performance
conditions in relation to the awards made in respect of cycles
ending on December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012 are provided on
page F-41.
|
|
(2)
|
|
This award was based on performance
to December 31, 2009. Performance was measured against both
the Companys TSR relative to a group of eight other
comparator companies and the cumulative annual growth rate
(CAGR) in adjusted EPS over the performance period.
The number of shares released was determined, according to
(a) where the Company finished in the TSR comparator group,
with 50% of the award being released for first position and 10%
of the award being released for median position; and
(b) the cumulative annual growth in adjusted EPS, with 50%
of the award being released for growth of 20% per annum or more
and 10% of the award being released for growth of 10% per annum.
The Company finished in fourth position in the TSR group and
achieved 15.2% per annum adjusted EPS growth. Accordingly, 46%
of the award vested on February 17, 2010.
|
F-47
Share
options
Between 2003 and 2005, grants of options were made under the IHG
Executive Share Option Plan. No executive share options have
been granted since then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares under option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
Options held
|
|
Lapsed
|
|
Exercised
|
|
Options
|
|
option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
at Jan 1,
|
|
during
|
|
during
|
|
held at
|
|
price
|
|
price
|
Directors
|
|
2010
|
|
the year
|
|
the year
|
|
Dec 31, 2010
|
|
(pence)
|
|
(pence)
|
|
Kirk Kinsell
|
|
|
77,110
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,110
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494.17
|
|
|
|
|
32,040
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,040
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
109,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,150
|
|
|
|
531.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Solomons
|
|
|
230,320
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,320
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494.17
|
|
|
|
|
100,550
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,550
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
330,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,870
|
|
|
|
532.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Executive share options granted in
2004 became exercisable in April 2007 up to April 2014.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Executive share options granted in
2005 became exercisable in April 2008 up to April 2015.
|
Option prices during the year ranged from 494.17 pence to 619.83
pence per IHG share. The closing market value share price on
December 31, 2010 was 1,243 pence and the range during the
year was 887 pence to 1,266 pence per share.
No Director exercised options during the year; therefore there
is no disclosable gain by Directors in aggregate for the year
ended December 31, 2010 (2009 £437,732).
|
|
Note 4
|
Auditors
remuneration paid to Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Group audit fees
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Audit fees in respect of subsidiaries
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Interim review fees
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Other services pursuant to legislation
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees in respect of the pension scheme were not material.
The Audit Committee has a process to ensure that any non-audit
services do not compromise the independence and objectivity of
the external auditor and that relevant United Kingdom and United
States professional and regulatory requirements are met. A
number of criteria are applied when deciding whether
pre-approval for such services should be given. These include
the nature of the service, the level of fees and the
practicality of appointing an alternative provider, having
regard to the skills and experience required to supply the
service effectively. Cumulative fees for audit and non-audit
services are presented to the Audit Committee on a quarterly
basis for review. The Audit Committee is responsible for
monitoring adherence to the pre-approval policy.
F-48
|
|
Note 5
|
Exceptional
items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptional operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onerous management
contracts(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Inn brand
relaunch(ii)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Reorganization and related
costs(iii)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Litigation
provision(iv)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced pension
transfer(v)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of associate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Gain on sale of other financial
assets(vi)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Gain/(loss) on disposal of hotels
(Note 11)*
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization and related
costs(iii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment (Note 10)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Assets held for sale (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Intangible assets (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Other financial assets (Note 15)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax on exceptional operating items
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Exceptional tax
credit(vii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations(viii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of hotels**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credit
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Relates to hotels classified as continuing operations.
|
**
|
Relates to hotels classified as discontinued operations.
|
The above items are treated as exceptional by reason of their
size or nature.
F-49
|
|
(i)
|
An onerous contract provision of $65 million was recognized
at December 31, 2009 for the future net unavoidable costs
under the performance guarantee related to certain management
contracts with one US hotel owner. In addition to the provision,
a deposit of $26 million was written off as it is no longer
considered recoverable under the terms of the same management
contracts.
|
|
(ii)
|
Relates to costs incurred in support of the worldwide relaunch
of the Holiday Inn brand family that was announced on
October 24, 2007.
|
|
(iii)
|
Primarily relates to the closure of certain corporate offices
together with severance costs arising from a review of the
Groups cost base.
|
|
(iv)
|
Estimate of the amount potentially payable in respect of a prior
year claim following an unfavorable court judgment on
February 23, 2011. Any final amount will not be known until
the court process is complete.
|
|
(v)
|
Related to the payment of enhanced pension transfers to those
deferred members of the InterContinental Hotels UK Pension Plan
who had accepted an offer to receive the enhancement either as a
cash lump sum or as an additional transfer value to an
alternative pension plan provider. The exceptional item in 2009
comprised the lump sum payments ($9 million), the IAS 19
settlement loss arising on the pension transfers
($11 million) and the costs of the arrangement
($1 million). The payments and transfers were made in
January 2009.
|
|
(vi)
|
Relates to the gain on sale of an investment in the EMEA region,
in both 2010 and 2008.
|
|
(vii)
|
Represents the release of provisions of $7 million (2009
$175 million, 2008 $25 million) which are exceptional
by reason of their size or nature relating to tax matters which
had been settled or in respect of which the relevant statutory
limitation period has expired, together with, in 2010, a $7
million charge relating to an internal reorganization. This
charge comprises the recognition of deferred tax assets of
$24 million for capital losses and other deductible
amounts, offset by tax charges of $31 million.
|
|
(viii)
|
In 2010, relates to tax refunded relating to the sale of a hotel
in a prior year. In 2009 and 2008, related to tax arising on
disposals together with the release of provisions no longer
required in respect of hotels disposed of in prior years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Fair value gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Finance charge payable under finance leases
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and expense relate to financial assets and
liabilities held at amortized cost, calculated using the
effective interest rate method.
Included within interest expense is $2 million (2009
$2 million, 2008 $12 million) payable to the Priority
Club Rewards loyalty program relating to interest on the
accumulated balance of cash received in advance of the
redemption of points awarded.
F-50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK corporation tax at 28% (2009 28%, 2008 28.5%):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Adjustments in respect of prior periods
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
tax(i):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Benefit of tax reliefs on which no deferred tax previously
recognized
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Adjustments in respect of prior
periods(ii)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current tax
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origination and reversal of temporary differences
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
Changes in tax rates
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustments to estimated recoverable deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Adjustments in respect of prior periods
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax charge/(credit) for the year
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further analyzed as tax relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before exceptional items
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Exceptional items (Note 5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptional operating items
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Exceptional tax
credit(iii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of assets
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total tax charge/(credit) can be further analyzed as
relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
Discontinued operations gain on disposal of assets
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Represents corporate income taxes
on profit taxable in foreign jurisdictions, a significant
proportion of which relates to the Groups US subsidiaries.
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Includes $7 million (2009 $165
million, 2008 $nil) of exceptional releases included at
(iii) below together with other releases relating to tax
matters which have been settled or in respect of which the
relevant statutory limitation period has expired.
|
|
(iii)
|
|
Represents the release of
provisions of $7 million (2009 $175 million, 2008
$25 million) which are exceptional by reason of their size
or nature relating to tax matters which have been settled or in
respect of which the relevant statutory limitation period has
expired, together with, in 2010, a $7 million charge relating to
an internal reorganization. This charge comprises the
recognition of deferred tax assets of $24 million for
capital losses and other deductible amounts, offset by tax
charges of $31 million.
|
F-51
Reconciliation
of tax charge/(credit), including gain on disposal of
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
exceptional
|
|
|
Total(i)
|
|
items(ii)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
UK corporation tax at standard rate
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
Non-deductible expenditure and non-taxable income
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Net effect of different rates of tax in overseas businesses
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
(43.0
|
)
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
Effect of changes in tax rates
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Benefit of tax reliefs on which no deferred tax previously
recognized
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Effect of adjustments to estimated recoverable deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Adjustment to tax charge in respect of prior periods
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
185.5
|
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
(37.6
|
)
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Exceptional items and gain on disposal of assets
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
298.3
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
441.3
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Calculated in relation to total
profits/losses including exceptional items.
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Calculated in relation to profits
excluding exceptional items.
|
Tax
paid
Total net tax paid during the year of $68 million (2009
$2 million, 2008 $2 million) comprises
$64 million paid (2009 $1 million paid, 2008
$1 million received) in respect of operating activities and
$4 million paid (2009 $1 million, 2008
$3 million) in respect of investing activities.
Tax paid is lower than the current period income tax charge
primarily due to the receipt of refunds in respect of prior
years together with provisions for tax for which no payment of
tax has currently been made.
Tax
risks, policies and governance
It is the Groups objective to comply fully with its
worldwide corporate income tax filing, payment and reporting
obligations, whilst managing its tax affairs within acceptable
risk parameters on a basis consistent with the Groups
overall business conduct principles in order to minimize its
worldwide liabilities in the best interests of its shareholders.
The Group adopts a policy of open co-operation with tax
authorities, with full disclosure of relevant issues.
The Groups tax objectives and policies, and any changes
thereto, are reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee.
Regular tax reports are made to the Chief Financial Officer in
addition to an annual presentation to the Audit Committee
covering the Groups tax position, strategy and major
risks. Tax is also encompassed within the Groups formal
risk management procedures and any material tax disputes,
litigation or tax planning activities are subject to internal
risk review and management approval procedures.
F-52
|
|
Note 8
|
Dividends
paid and proposed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(cents per share)
|
|
($ million)
|
|
|
|
Paid during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final (declared for previous year)
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Interim
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed (not recognized as a liability at December 31):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The final dividend of 22.0 pence (35.2 cents converted at
the closing exchange rate on February 11, 2011) is
proposed for approval at the Annual General Meeting on
May 27, 2011 and is payable on the shares in issue at
March 25, 2011.
|
|
Note 9
|
Earnings
per ordinary share
|
Basic earnings per ordinary share is calculated by dividing the
profit for the year available for IHG equity holders by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares, excluding investment
in own shares, in issue during the year.
Diluted earnings per ordinary share is calculated by adjusting
basic earnings per ordinary share to reflect the notional
exercise of the weighted average number of dilutive ordinary
share options outstanding during the year.
Adjusted earnings per ordinary share is disclosed in order to
show performance undistorted by exceptional items, to give a
more meaningful comparison of the Groups performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
Total
|
|
operations
|
|
Total
|
|
operations
|
|
Total
|
|
Basic earnings per ordinary share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit available for equity holders ($ million)
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Basic weighted average number of ordinary shares (millions)
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Basic earnings per ordinary share (cents)
|
|
|
96.5
|
|
|
|
97.2
|
|
|
|
72.6
|
|
|
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
89.5
|
|
|
|
91.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per ordinary share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit available for equity holders ($ million)
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of ordinary shares (millions)
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (cents)
|
|
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
94.6
|
|
|
|
70.2
|
|
|
|
72.2
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
|
|
|
88.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
Diluted weighted average of ordinary shares is calculated as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of ordinary shares
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Dilutive potential ordinary shares employee share
options
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
Total
|
|
operations
|
|
Total
|
|
operations
|
|
Total
|
|
Adjusted earnings per ordinary share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit available for equity holders ($ million)
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Adjusting items (Note 5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptional operating items ($ million)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Tax on exceptional operating items ($ million)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Exceptional tax credit ($ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of assets, net of tax ($ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted earnings ($ million)
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
Basic weighted average number of ordinary shares (millions)
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Adjusted earnings per ordinary share (cents)
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
|
|
102.8
|
|
|
|
102.8
|
|
|
|
120.9
|
|
|
|
120.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted earnings ($ million)
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of ordinary shares (millions)
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Adjusted diluted earnings per ordinary share (cents)
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
|
|
117.2
|
|
|
|
117.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
Fixtures,
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
fittings and
|
|
|
|
|
buildings
|
|
equipment
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2009
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Net transfers from non-current assets classified as held for sale
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
Reclassification
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and impairment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2009
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(482
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
Provided
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Net transfers from non-current assets classified as held for sale
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
Impairment charge (see below)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Valuation adjustments arising on reclassification from held for
sale (Note 11)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
Fixtures,
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
fittings and
|
|
|
|
|
buildings
|
|
equipment
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2010
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Net transfers to non-current assets classified as held for sale
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
2,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and impairment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2010
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
Provided
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Net transfers to non-current assets classified as held for sale
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Impairment charge (see below)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
|
|
(855
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impairment charge in 2010 arose in respect of one hotel in
the Americas following a re-assessment of its recoverable
amount, based on value in use. Estimated future cash flows were
discounted at a pre-tax rate of 11.8%. The charge is included
within impairment on the face of the Consolidated income
statement.
The impairment charge in 2009 arose as a result of the economic
downturn and a re-assessment of the recoverable amount of
certain properties, based on value in use. The charge, which is
included within impairment on the face of the Consolidated
income statement, comprised $20 million in respect of a North
American hotel and $8 million relating to a European hotel.
Estimated future cash flows were discounted at pre-tax rates of
14.0% and 12.5% respectively.
The carrying value of property, plant and equipment held under
finance leases at December 31, 2010 was $183 million
(2009 $187 million).
The carrying value of assets in the course of construction was
$nil (2009 $nil).
No borrowing costs were capitalized during the year (2009 $nil).
Charges over one hotel totaling $85 million exist as security
provided to the Groups pension plans.
|
|
Note 11
|
Assets
sold, held for sale and discontinued operations
|
There were no assets or liabilities classified as held for sale
at either December 31, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
Subsequent to December 31, 2010, four hotels, including the
InterContinental Barclay in New York, met the held for
sale criteria of IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held
for Sale and Discontinued Operations. Three of the
properties are located in North America and one in Australia,
and all are expected to be sold within 12 months. The fair
value less estimated costs to sell for each property exceeds its
net book value.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, two hotels in the
Americas were sold including the InterContinental Buckhead,
Atlanta on July 1, 2010 for a profit of $27 million.
F-55
During the year ended December 31, 2009, one hotel was sold
and four others were reclassified as property, plant and
equipment at June 30, 2009 when they no longer met the
held for sale criteria of IFRS 5 Non-current
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations as sales
were no longer considered highly probable within the next
12 months. On reclassification, valuation adjustments of
$45 million were recognized, comprising $14 million of
depreciation not charged whilst held for sale and
$31 million of further write-downs to recoverable amounts,
as required by IFRS 5. Recoverable amounts were assessed by
reference to value in use with the expected future cash flows
for the North American hotels comprising substantially all of
the write-downs discounted at a pre-tax rate of 12.5%. The
valuation adjustments are included within impairment on the face
of the Consolidated income statement.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, one hotel was sold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year disposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration, net of costs paid
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Management contract value
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of hotels sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year disposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision release
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analyzed as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(loss) on disposal of hotel assets from continuing
operations (Note 5)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of assets from discontinued operations
(Note 5)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash inflow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year disposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration, net of costs paid
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Cash disposed of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Prior year disposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs paid
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Tax
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
The results of discontinued operations comprise gains arising
from prior year hotel disposals of $2 million (2009
$6 million 2008 $5 million) and do not impact on segmental
results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(cents)
|
|
Earnings per ordinary share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows attributable to discontinued operations were $2
million (2009 $nil, 2008 $nil).
F-56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1,
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1,
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value at December 31,
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value at January 1,
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill arising on business combinations that occurred before
January 1, 2005 was not restated on adoption of IFRS as
permitted by IFRS 1.
Impairment charges are included within impairment on the face of
the Consolidated income statement and all cumulative impairment
losses relate to the Americas managed cash-generating unit (see
below).
Goodwill has been allocated to cash-generating units
(CGUs) for impairment testing as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Net book value
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Asia Australasia franchised and managed operations
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Americas managed operations
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Group tests goodwill for impairment annually, or more
frequently if there are any indications that an impairment may
have arisen. The recoverable amounts of the CGUs are determined
from value in use calculations. These calculations use pre-tax
cash flow forecasts derived from the most recent financial
budgets and strategic plans approved by management covering a
five-year period or, in absence of
up-to-date
strategic plans, the financial budget for the next year with an
extrapolation of the cash flows for the following four years,
using growth rates based on managements past experience
and industry growth forecasts. After the five-year planning
period, the terminal value of the future cash flows is
calculated based on perpetual growth rates that do not exceed
the average long-term growth rates for the relevant markets.
Pre-tax discount rates are used to discount the cash flows based
on the Groups weighted average cost of capital adjusted to
reflect the risks specific to the business model and territory
of the CGU being tested.
Asia
Australasia goodwill
At December 31, 2010, the recoverable amount of the CGU has
been assessed based on the approved budget for 2011 and
strategic plans covering a five-year period, a perpetual growth
rate of 3.5% (2009 3.5%) and a discount rate of 14.4% (2009
14.2%).
Impairment was not required at either December 31, 2010 or
December 31, 2009 and management believe that the carrying
value of the CGU would only exceed their recoverable amounts in
the event of highly unlikely changes in the key assumptions.
F-57
Americas
goodwill
Americas managed operations incurred significant operating
losses during 2009 as a result of the global economic downturn
and, in particular, IHGs funding obligations under certain
management contracts with one US hotel owner. As a consequence,
goodwill was tested on a quarterly basis during 2009 using
updated five-year projections prepared by management, a
perpetual growth rate of 2.7% and a discount rate of 12.5%. Due
to the expectation of continuing losses, the recoverable value
of the CGU declined resulting in the impairment of the remaining
goodwill balance during 2009. Total impairment charges of
$78 million were recognized in 2009 ($57 million at
June 30, 2009 and $21 million at September 30,
2009). As the goodwill is impaired in full, there is no
sensitivity around any assumptions that could lead to a further
impairment charge.
|
|
Note 13
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Software
|
|
contracts
|
|
intangibles
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2009
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and impairment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2009
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
Provided
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Impairment charge (see below)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2010
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and impairment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2010
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
Provided
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impairment charge in 2009 arose as a result of the economic
downturn and a revision to the fee income expected to be earned
under a US management contract. Estimated future cash flows were
discounted at a pre-tax rate of 12.5% (previous valuation 12.5%).
The charge is included within impairment on the face of the
Consolidated income statement.
F-58
The weighted average remaining amortization period for
management contracts is 21 years (2009 22 years).
|
|
Note 14
|
Investment
in associates
|
The Group holds five investments (2009 five) accounted for as
associates. The following table summarizes the financial
information of the associates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Share of associates statement of financial position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of associates revenue and profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Amounts owed by related parties
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 15
|
Other
financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Other
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets, which are included in the Consolidated
statement of financial position at fair value, consist of equity
investments in listed and unlisted shares. Of the total amount
of equity investments at December 31, 2010, $3 million
(2009 $2 million) were listed securities and
$84 million (2009 $69 million) unlisted;
$41 million (2009 $39 million) were denominated in US
dollars, $17 million (2009 $14 million) in Hong Kong
dollars and $29 million (2009 $18 million) in other
currencies. Unlisted equity shares are mainly investments in
entities that own hotels which the Group manages. The fair value
of unlisted equity shares has been estimated using valuation
guidelines issued by the British Venture Capital Association and
is based on assumptions regarding expected future earnings.
Listed equity share valuation is based on observable market
prices. Dividend income from
available-for-sale
equity securities of $8 million (2009 $7 million, 2008
$11 million) is reported as other operating income and
expenses in the Consolidated income statement.
Other financial assets consist of trade deposits and restricted
cash. These amounts have been designated as loans and
receivables and are held at amortized cost. Restricted
cash of $42 million (2009 $47 million) relates to cash
held in bank accounts which is pledged as collateral to
insurance companies for risks retained by the Group.
F-59
The movement in the provision for impairment of other financial
assets during the year is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
At January 1,
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Provided exceptional items (Note 5)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts provided as exceptional items relate to
available-for-sale
equity investments and have arisen as a result of significant
and prolonged declines in their fair value below cost. In 2009,
a deposit of $26 million was written off directly to the
income statement as an exceptional item (see
Note 5) as it is no longer considered recoverable
under the terms of the related management contracts which are
deemed onerous.
The provision is used to record impairment losses unless the
Group is satisfied that no recovery of the amount is possible;
at that point the amount considered irrecoverable is either
written off directly to the income statement, or, if previously
provided, against the financial asset with no impact on the
income statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Consumable stores
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 17
|
Trade and
other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Prepayments
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables are designated as loans and
receivables and are held at amortized cost.
Trade receivables are non-interest-bearing and are generally on
payment terms of up to 30 days. The fair value of trade and
other receivables approximates their carrying value.
The maximum exposure to credit risk for trade and other
receivables, excluding prepayments, at the end of the reporting
period by geographic region is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
Europe, the Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
The aging of trade and other receivables, excluding prepayments,
at the end of the reporting period is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Provision
|
|
Net
|
|
Gross
|
|
Provision
|
|
Net
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Not past due
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
171
|
|
Past due 1 to 30 days
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
Past due 31 to 180 days
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
Past due more than 180 days
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The movement in the provision for impairment of trade and other
receivables during the year is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
At January 1,
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Provided
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Amounts written back
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Amounts written off
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 18
|
Cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Cash at bank and in hand
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Short-term deposits
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term deposits are highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less, in various currencies.
|
|
Note 19
|
Trade and
other payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Other tax and social security payable
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables are non-interest-bearing and are normally settled
within an average of 45 days.
F-61
Other payables includes $531 million (2009
$470 million) relating to the future redemption liability
of the Groups loyalty program, of which $92 million
(2009 $86 million) is classified as current and
$439 million (2009 $384 million) as non-current.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onerous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contracts
|
|
Litigation
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
At January 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provided: exceptional items (Note 5)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Provided:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before exceptional items
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Exceptional items (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Utilized
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Analyzed as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The onerous management contracts provision relates to the
unavoidable net cash outflows that are expected to be incurred
under performance guarantees associated with certain management
contracts. The non-current portion of the provision is expected
to be utilized over the period to 2020.
For accounting purposes, provision is made for outstanding
litigation when management consider it probable that an outflow
of economic benefit may occur even though defense of such claims
may still be ongoing through the relevant court processes.
|
|
Note 21
|
Financial
risk management
|
Overview
The Groups treasury policy is to manage financial risks
that arise in relation to underlying business needs. The
activities of the treasury function are carried out in
accordance with Board approved policies and are subject to
regular audit. The treasury function does not operate as a
profit center.
The treasury function seeks to reduce the financial risk of the
Group and manages liquidity to meet all foreseeable cash needs.
Treasury activities include money market investments, spot and
forward foreign exchange instruments, currency options, currency
swaps, interest rate swaps and options and forward rate
agreements. One of the primary objectives of the Groups
treasury risk management policy is to mitigate the adverse
impact of movements in interest rates and foreign exchange rates.
Market
risk exposure
The US dollar is the predominant currency of the Groups
revenue and cash flows. Movements in foreign exchange rates can
affect the Groups reported profit, net assets and interest
cover. To hedge translation exposure,
F-62
wherever possible, the Group matches the currency of its debt
(either directly or via derivatives) to the currency of its net
assets, whilst maximizing the amount of US dollars borrowed to
reflect the predominant trading currency.
Foreign exchange transaction exposure is managed by the forward
purchase or sale of foreign currencies or the use of currency
options. Most significant exposures of the Group are in
currencies that are freely convertible.
A general strengthening of the US dollar (specifically a five
cent fall in the sterling : US dollar rate) would increase the
Groups profit before tax by an estimated $3.5 million
(2009 $1.6 million, 2008 $4.0 million) and decrease
net assets by an estimated $5.6 million (2009
$4.1 million, 2008 $1.1 million). Similarly, a five
cent fall in the euro : US dollar rate would reduce the
Groups profit before tax by an estimated $1.4 million
(2009 $0.7 million, 2008 $2.0 million) and decrease
net assets by an estimated $8.2 million (2009
$4.5 million, 2008 $4.3 million).
Interest rate exposure is managed within parameters that
stipulate that fixed rate borrowings should normally account for
no less than 25% and no more than 75% of net borrowings for each
major currency. This is usually achieved through the use of
interest rate swaps. Due to relatively low interest rates and
the level of the Groups debt, 100% of borrowings were
fixed rate debt or had been swapped into fixed rate borrowings
at December 31, 2010.
Based on the year-end net debt position and given the underlying
maturity profile of investments, borrowings and hedging
instruments at that date, a one percentage point rise in US
dollar interest rates would increase the annual net interest
charge by approximately $nil (2009 $0.8 million, 2008
$4.7 million). A similar rise in euro and sterling interest
rates would increase the annual net interest charge by
approximately $nil (2009 $1.1 million, 2008
$1.2 million) and $nil (2009 $nil, 2008 $0.9 million)
respectively.
Liquidity
risk exposure
The treasury function ensures that the Group has access to
sufficient funds to allow the implementation of the strategy set
by the Board. At the year end, the Group had access to
$1,452 million of undrawn committed facilities. Medium and
long-term borrowing requirements are met through the
$1.6 billion Syndicated Facility which expires in May 2013
and through the £250 million 6% bonds that are
repayable on December 9, 2016. Short-term borrowing
requirements are met from drawings under bilateral bank
facilities.
The Syndicated Facility contains two financial covenants:
interest cover and net debt divided by earnings before interest,
tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Net
debt is calculated as total borrowings less cash and cash
equivalents. The Group is in compliance with all of the
financial covenants in its loan documents, none of which is
expected to present a material restriction on funding in the
near future.
At the year end, the Group had cash of $78 million which
is held in short-term deposits and cash funds which allow daily
withdrawals of cash. Most of the Groups funds are held in
the United Kingdom or United States and there are no material
funds where repatriation is restricted as a result of foreign
exchange regulations.
Credit
risk exposure
Credit risk on treasury transactions is minimized by operating a
policy on the investment of surplus cash that generally
restricts counterparties to those with an A credit rating or
better or those providing adequate security.
Notwithstanding that counterparties must have an A credit rating
or better, during periods of significant financial market
turmoil, counterparty exposure limits are significantly reduced
and counterparty credit exposure reviews are broadened to
include the relative placing of credit default swap pricings.
The Group trades only with recognized, creditworthy third
parties. It is the Groups policy that all customers who
wish to trade on credit terms are subject to credit verification
procedures.
In respect of credit risk arising from financial assets, the
Groups exposure to credit risk arises from default of the
counterparty, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying
amount of these instruments.
Capital
risk management
The Group manages its capital to ensure that it will be able to
continue as a going concern. The capital structure consists of
net debt, issued share capital and reserves totaling
$1,014 million at December 31, 2010 (2009
F-63
$1,241 million). The structure is managed to maintain an
investment grade credit rating, to provide ongoing returns to
shareholders and to service debt obligations, whilst maintaining
maximum operational flexibility. A key characteristic of
IHGs managed and franchised business model is that it
generates more cash than is required for investment in the
business, with a high return on capital employed. Surplus cash
is either reinvested in the business, used to repay debt or
returned to shareholders. The Group maintains a conservative
level of debt which is monitored on the basis of a cashflow
leverage ratio, being net debt divided by EBITDA.
Hedging
Interest
rate risk
The Group hedges its interest rate risk by taking out interest
rate swaps to fix the interest flows on between 25% and 75% of
its net borrowings in major currencies, although 100% of
interest flows were fixed at December 31, 2010. At
December 31, 2010, the Group held interest rate swaps
(swapping floating for fixed) with notional principals of
$100 million and 75 million (2009
$250 million and 75 million). The Group
designates its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges (see Note
23 for further details).
Foreign
currency risk
The Group is exposed to foreign currency risk on income streams
denominated in foreign currencies. From time to time, the Group
hedges a portion of forecast foreign currency income by taking
out forward exchange contracts. The designated risk is the spot
foreign exchange risk. There were no such contracts in place at
either December 31, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
Hedge of
net investment in foreign operations
The Group designates its foreign currency bank borrowings and
currency derivatives as net investment hedges of foreign
operations. The designated risk is the spot foreign exchange
risk for loans and short dated derivatives and the forward risk
for the seven-year currency swaps. The interest on these
financial instruments is taken through financial income or
expense except for the seven-year currency swaps where interest
is taken to the currency translation reserve.
At December 31 2010, the Group held currency swaps with a
principal of $415 million (2009 $415 million) and short dated
foreign exchange swaps with principals of 75 million (2009
nil) and HK$70 million (2009 nil). See Note 23 for further
details. The maximum amount of foreign exchange derivatives held
during the year as net investment hedges and measured at
calendar quarter ends were currency swaps with a principal of
$415 million (2009 $415 million) and short dated
foreign exchange swaps with principals of HK$280 million and
75 million.
Hedge effectiveness is measured at calendar quarter ends. No
ineffectiveness arose in respect of either the Groups cash
flow or net investment hedges during the current or prior year.
F-64
Liquidity
risk
The following are the undiscounted contractual cash flows of
financial liabilities, including interest payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
Between 1 and
|
|
Between 2 and
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
2 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-derivative financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured bank loans
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
£250m 6% bonds
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
Finance lease obligations
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
Unsecured bank loans
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Derivative financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Currency swaps - outflows
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
Currency swaps - inflows
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
Between 1 and
|
|
Between 2 and
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
2 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-derivative financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured bank loans
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
£250m 6% bonds
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
Finance lease obligations
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
3,364
|
|
|
|
3,444
|
|
Unsecured bank loans
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Derivative financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Currency swaps - outflows
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
Currency swaps - inflows
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows relating to unsecured bank loans are classified
according to the maturity date of the loan drawdown rather than
the facility maturity date.
Interest rate swaps are expected to affect profit or loss in the
same periods that the cash flows are expected to occur.
F-65
Credit
risk
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum
exposure to credit risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Equity securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Loans and receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Trade and other receivables, excluding prepayments
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
values
The table below compares carrying amounts and fair values of the
Groups financial assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
Fair value
|
|
value
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
available-for-sale*
(Note 15)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Loans and receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 18)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other financial assets (Note 15)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Trade and other receivables, excluding prepayments (Note 17)
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£250 million 6% bonds (Note 22)
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
Finance lease obligations (Note 22)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
Other borrowings (Note 22)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
Trade and other payables (Note 19)
|
|
|
(1,186
|
)
|
|
|
(1,186
|
)
|
|
|
(1,076
|
)
|
|
|
(1,076
|
)
|
Derivatives* (Note 23)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Provisions (Note 20)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Financial assets and liabilities
which are measured at fair value.
|
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates book
value due to the short maturity of the investments and deposits.
Equity securities
available-for-sale
and derivatives are held in the Consolidated statement of
financial position at fair value as set out in Note 15 and
Note 23. The fair value of other financial assets approximates
book value based on prevailing market rates. The fair value of
borrowings, excluding finance lease obligations and the fixed
rate $250 million 6% bonds, approximates book value as
interest rates reset to market rates on a frequent basis. The
fair value of the £250 million 6% bonds is based on
the quoted market price. The fair value of the finance lease
obligations is calculated by discounting future cash flows at
prevailing interest rates. The fair value of trade and other
receivables, trade and other payables and provisions
approximates to their carrying value, including the future
redemption liability of the Groups loyalty program.
F-66
Fair
value hierarchy
The Group uses the following valuation hierarchy to determine
the carrying value of financial instruments that are measured at
fair value:
Level 1: quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: other techniques for which all inputs which have a
significant effect on the recorded fair value are observable,
either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: techniques which use inputs which have a
significant effect on the recorded fair value that are not based
on observable market data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2
fair value measurements during the year and no transfers into
and out of Level 3.
The following table reconciles movements in instruments
classified as Level 3 during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
($ million)
|
|
At January 1,
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repaid
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation gains recognized in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Impairment*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
The impairment charge recognized in
the income statement (see Note 5) also includes $1
million (2009 $4 million) of losses reclassified from
equity.
|
The Level 3 equity securities relate to investments in
unlisted shares which are valued by applying an average
price-earnings (P/E) ratio for a competitor group to the
earnings generated by the investment. A 10% increase in the
average P/E ratio would result in a $4 million increase in
the fair value of the investments (2009 $5 million) and a
10% decrease in the average P/E ratio would result in a
$4 million decrease in the fair value of the investments
(2009 $5 million).
F-67
|
|
Note 22
|
Loans and
other borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Non-current
|
|
Total
|
|
Current
|
|
Non-current
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Secured bank loans
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
£250 million 6% bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
Unsecured bank loans
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominated in the following currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
US dollars
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
bank loans
These mortgages are secured on the hotel properties to which
they relate. The rates of interest and currencies of these loans
vary.
Non-current amounts include $4 million (2009
$5 million) repayable by installments.
Finance
leases
Finance lease obligations, which relate to the
99-year
lease on the InterContinental Boston, are payable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Present
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Present
|
|
|
lease
|
|
value of
|
|
lease
|
|
value of
|
|
|
payments
|
|
payments
|
|
payments
|
|
payments
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Between one and five years
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
More than five years
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
3,364
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
3,444
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
Less: amount representing finance charges
|
|
|
(3,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Group has the option to extend the term of the lease for two
additional 20-year terms. Payments under the lease step up at
regular intervals over the lease term.
£250 million
6% bonds
The 6% fixed interest sterling bonds were issued on
December 9, 2009 and are repayable in full on
December 9, 2016. Interest is payable annually on
December 9, in each year commencing December 9, 2010
to the maturity date. The bonds were initially priced at 99.465%
of face value and are unsecured. Currency swaps were transacted
at the same time the bonds were issued in order to swap its
proceeds and interest flows into US dollars (see Note 23
for further details).
F-68
Unsecured
bank loans
Unsecured bank loans are borrowings under the Groups
Syndicated Facility and its short-term bilateral loan
facilities. Amounts are classified as non-current when the
facilities have more than 12 months to expiry. These
facilities contain financial covenants and, as at the end of the
reporting period, the Group was not in breach of these
covenants, nor had any breaches or defaults occurred during the
year. At January 1, 2009 the Group had access to a
$0.5 billion term loan with a
30-month
maturity and a $1.6 billion five-year revolving credit
facility. In December 2009, $415 million of the term loan
was repaid with proceeds from the bond issue and the remaining
$85 million was repaid in September 2010. The
$1.6 billion revolving credit facility matures in May 2013.
Facilities
provided by banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Utilized
|
|
Unutilized
|
|
Total
|
|
Utilized
|
|
Unutilized
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Committed
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
Uncommitted
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Unutilized facilities expire:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
After two but before five years
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilized facilities are calculated based on actual drawings and
may not agree to the carrying value of loans held at amortized
cost.
|
|
Note 23
|
Derivative
financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
restated*
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analyzed as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Restated for a $13 million
reclassification from current liabilities to non-current
liabilities.
|
Derivatives are recorded at their fair values, estimated using
discounted future cash flows taking into consideration interest
and exchange rates prevailing on the last day of the reporting
period.
F-69
Currency
swaps
At December 31, 2010, the Group held currency swaps with a
principal of $415 million (2009 $415 million). These swaps were
transacted at the same time as the £250 million 6%
bonds were issued in December 2009 in order to swap the
bonds proceeds and interest flows into US dollars. Under
the terms of the swaps, $415 million was borrowed and
£250 million deposited for seven years at a fixed
exchange rate of 1.66. The fair value of the currency swap
comprises two components; $27 million (2009
$10 million) relating to the repayment of the underlying
principal and $11 million (2009 $3 million) relating
to interest payments. The element relating to the underlying
principal is disclosed as a component of net debt (see
Note 24). The currency swaps are designated as net
investment hedges.
Interest
rate swaps
At December 31, 2010, the Group held interest rate swaps
with notional principals of $100 million and
75 million (2009 $250 million and
75 million). These swaps are held to fix the interest
payable on borrowings under the Syndicated Facility; at
December 31, 2010, $100 million of US dollar
borrowings were fixed at 1.99% until May 2012 and
75 million of euro borrowings were fixed at 5.25%
until June 2011. The interest rate swaps have been
designated as cash flow hedges.
Forward
foreign exchange contracts
At December 31, 2010, the Group held short dated foreign
exchange swaps with principals of 75 million and
HK$70 million (2009 nil). The swaps are used to manage
US dollar surplus cash and reduce euro and Hong Kong dollar
borrowings whilst maintaining operational flexibility. The
foreign exchange swaps have been designated as net investment
hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
At
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
restated*
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Loans and other borrowings current
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Loans and other borrowings non-current
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
(1,016
|
)
|
Derivatives hedging debt values (Note 23)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt
|
|
|
(743
|
)
|
|
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
With effect from January 1,
2010, net debt includes the exchange element of the fair value
of currency swaps that fix the value of the Groups
£250 million 6% bonds at $415 million. An equal
and opposite exchange adjustment on the retranslation of the
£250 million 6% bonds is included in non-current loans
and other borrowings. Comparatives have been restated on a
consistent basis.
|
F-70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
restated*
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Movement in net debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Add back cash flows in respect of other components of net debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of £250m 6% bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
Decrease in other borrowings
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net debt arising from cash flows
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
Non-cash movements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance lease liability
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net debt
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Net debt at beginning of the year
|
|
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
|
(1,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt at end of the year
|
|
|
(743
|
)
|
|
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
With effect from January 1,
2010, net debt includes the exchange element of the fair value
of currency swaps that fix the value of the Groups
£250 million 6% bonds at $415 million. An equal
and opposite exchange adjustment on the retranslation of the
£250 million 6% bonds is included in non-current loans
and other borrowings. Comparatives have been restated on a
consistent basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
short-term
|
|
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
gains on
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
Intangible
|
|
temporary
|
|
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
loan notes
|
|
Losses
|
|
benefits
|
|
assets
|
|
differences
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
At January 1, 2009
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
Income statement
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
Statement of comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Statement of changes in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Income statement
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Statement of comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Statement of changes in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Exchange and other adjustments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Analyzed as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-71
Deferred gains on loan notes includes $55 million (2009
$55 million) which is expected to fall due for payment in
2016.
The deferred tax asset of $150 million (2009
$146 million) recognized in respect of losses includes
$113 million (2009 $97 million) in respect of capital
losses available to be utilized against the realization of
capital gains which are recognized as a deferred tax liability
and $37 million (2009 $49 million) in respect of
revenue tax losses. Deferred tax assets of $88 million are
recognized in relation to legal entities which suffered a tax
loss in the current or preceding period. These assets are
recognized based upon future taxable profit forecasts for the
entities concerned.
Tax losses with a net tax value of $411 million (2009
$517 million), including capital losses with a value of
$148 million (2009 $196 million), have not been
recognized. These losses may be carried forward indefinitely
with the exception of $16 million which expires after six
years (2009 $1 million which expires after 15 years,
$1 million which expires after nine years and
$14 million which expires after seven years). Deferred tax
assets with a net tax value of $nil (2009 $9 million)
in respect of share-based payments, $15 million (2009
$13 million) in respect of employee benefits and
$5 million (2009 $7 million) in respect of other items
have not been recognized. These losses and other deferred tax
assets have not been recognized as the Group does not anticipate
being able to offset these against future profits or gains in
order to realize any economic benefit in the foreseeable future.
However, future benefits may arise depending on future profits
arising or on the outcome of EU case law and legislative
developments.
At December 31, 2010 the Group has not provided deferred
tax in relation to temporary differences associated with
post-acquisition undistributed earnings of subsidiaries as the
Group is in a position to control the timing of reversal of
these temporary differences and it is probable that they will
not reverse in the foreseeable future. Following the
introduction of a UK dividend exemption regime, the tax which
would arise upon reversal of the temporary differences is not
expected to exceed $20 million.
Other short-term temporary differences relate primarily to
provisions and accruals and share-based payments.
|
|
Note 26
|
Share-based
payments
|
Annual
Bonus Plan
The IHG Annual Bonus Plan enables eligible employees, including
Executive Directors, to receive all or part of their bonus in
the form of shares together with, in certain cases, a matching
award of free shares of up to half the deferred amount. The
bonus and any matching shares awarded are released on the third
anniversary of the award date. The bonuses in 2007 were eligible
for matching shares, all of which will be released on the third
anniversary of the award date. In 2007, participants could defer
up to 100% of the total annual bonus, with the deferred amount
being accounted for as a share-based payment. Under the terms of
the 2008, 2009 and 2010 plans, a fixed percentage of the bonus
is awarded in the form of shares with no voluntary deferral and
no matching shares. The awards in all of the plans are
conditional on the participants remaining in the employment of a
participating company or leaving for a qualifying reason as per
the plan rules. Participation in the Annual Bonus Plan is at the
discretion of the Remuneration Committee. The number of shares
is calculated by dividing a specific percentage of the
participants annual performance-related bonus by the
middle market quoted prices on the three consecutive dealing
days immediately preceding the date of grant. A number of
executives participated in the plan during the year however, no
conditional rights over shares (2009 1,058,734, 2008 661,657)
were awarded to participants. In 2009 this number included
228,000 shares awarded as part of recruitment terms or for
one-off individual performance-related awards.
Long
Term Incentive Plan
The Long Term Incentive Plan allows Executive Directors and
eligible employees to receive share awards, subject to the
satisfaction of performance conditions, set by the Remuneration
Committee, which are normally measured over a three-year period.
Awards are normally made annually and, except in exceptional
circumstances, will not exceed three times salary for Executive
Directors and four times salary in the case of other eligible
employees. During the year, conditional rights over 2,602,773
(2009 5,754,548, 2008 5,060,509) shares were
F-72
awarded to employees under the plan. The plan provides for the
grant of nil cost options to participants as an
alternative to conditional share awards.
Executive
Share Option Plan
For options granted, the option price is not less than the
market value of an ordinary share, or the nominal value if
higher. The market value is the quoted price on the business day
preceding the date of grant, or the average of the middle market
quoted prices on the three consecutive dealing days immediately
preceding the date of grant. A performance condition has to be
met before options can be exercised. The performance condition
is set by the Remuneration Committee. The plan was not operated
during 2010 and no options were granted in the year under the
plan. The latest date that any options may be exercised is
April 4, 2015.
Sharesave
Plan
The Sharesave Plan is a savings plan whereby employees contract
to save a fixed amount each month with a savings institution for
three or five years. At the end of the savings term, employees
are given the option to purchase shares at a price set before
savings began. The Sharesave Plan is available to all UK
employees (including Executive Directors) employed by
participating Group companies provided that they have been
employed for at least one year. The plan provides for the grant
of options to subscribe for ordinary shares at the higher of
nominal value and not less than 80% of the middle market
quotations of the ordinary shares on the three dealing days
immediately preceding the invitation date. The plan was not
operated during 2010 and no options were granted in the year
under the plan. There were no options outstanding at
January 1, 2010.
US
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The US Employee Stock Purchase Plan will allow eligible
employees resident in the United States an opportunity to
acquire Company American Depositary Shares
(ADSs) on advantageous terms. The option to
purchase ADSs may be offered only to employees of designated
subsidiary companies. The option price may not be less than the
lesser of either 85% of the fair market value of an ADS on the
date of grant or 85% of the fair market value of an ADS on the
date of exercise. Options granted under the plan must generally
be exercised within 27 months from the date of grant. The
plan was not operated during 2010 and at December 31, 2010
no options had been granted under the plan.
Former
Six Continents Share Schemes
Under the terms of the separation of Six Continents PLC in 2003,
holders of options under the Six Continents Executive Share
Option Schemes were given the opportunity to exchange their Six
Continents PLC options for equivalent value new options over IHG
shares. As a result of this exchange, 23,195,482 shares
were put under option at prices ranging from 308.5 pence to
593.3 pence. The exchanged options were immediately exercisable
and are not subject to performance conditions. During 2010,
1,016,572 (2009 380,457) such options were exercised and 82,076
(2009 43,088) lapsed, leaving a total of 902,412 (2009
2,001,060) such options outstanding at prices ranging from 308.5
pence to 434.2 pence. The latest date that any options may be
exercised is October 3, 2012.
F-73
The Group recognized a cost of $32 million (2009
$22 million, 2008 $47 million) in operating profit and
$1 million (2009 $2 million, 2008 $2 million)
within exceptional administrative expenses related to
equity-settled share-based payment transactions during the year.
The aggregate consideration in respect of ordinary shares issued
under option schemes during the year was $19 million (2009
$11 million, 2008 $2 million).
The following table sets forth awards and options granted during
2010. No awards were granted under the Annual Bonus Plan,
Executive Share Option Plan, Sharesave Plan or US Employee Stock
Purchase Plan during the year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Number of shares awarded in 2010
|
|
|
2,602,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Group uses separate option pricing models and assumptions
depending on the plan. The following tables set forth
information about options granted in 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term
|
2010
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
Valuation model
|
|
Monte Carlo
|
|
|
Simulation and
|
|
|
Binomial
|
|
Weighted average share price (pence)
|
|
|
1,033.0
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
3.10
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
Volatility*
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Term (years)
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Long Term
|
2009
|
|
Bonus Plan
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
Valuation model
|
|
Binomial
|
|
Monte Carlo
|
|
|
|
|
Simulation and
|
|
|
|
|
Binomial
|
|
Weighted average share price (pence)
|
|
|
454.0
|
|
|
|
612.0
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
4.89
|
%
|
|
|
5.26
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
Volatility*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Term (years)
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Long Term
|
2008
|
|
Bonus Plan
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
Valuation model
|
|
Binomial
|
|
Monte Carlo
|
|
|
|
|
Simulation and
|
|
|
|
|
Binomial
|
|
Weighted average share price (pence)
|
|
|
836.0
|
|
|
|
865.0
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
|
2.76
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
Volatility*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Term (years)
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
The expected volatility was
determined by calculating the historical volatility of the
Companys share price corresponding to the expected life of
the share award.
|
F-74
Movements in the awards and options outstanding under the
schemes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
Bonus Plan
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
11,463
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(2,752
|
)
|
Lapsed or canceled
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
11,153
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
5,755
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(434
|
)
|
|
|
(3,124
|
)
|
Lapsed or canceled
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(1,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,854
|
|
|
|
12,266
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,603
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
Lapsed or canceled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
|
|
11,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of awards granted during the year (cents)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
n/a
|
*
|
|
|
1,181.9
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
735.6
|
|
|
|
414.1
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,436.0
|
|
|
|
870.4
|
|
Weighted average remaining contract life (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
No awards were granted during the
year.
|
The above awards do not vest until the performance and service
conditions have been met.
F-75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharesave Plan
|
|
Executive Share Option Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Range of
|
|
average
|
|
Number of
|
|
Range of
|
|
average
|
|
|
shares
|
|
option prices
|
|
option price
|
|
shares
|
|
option prices
|
|
option price
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
(pence)
|
|
(pence)
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
(pence)
|
|
(pence)
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
8,194
|
|
|
|
308.5-619.8
|
|
|
|
487.4
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
434.2-619.8
|
|
|
|
543.6
|
|
Lapsed or canceled
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
349.1-593.2
|
|
|
|
431.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
7,635
|
|
|
|
308.5-619.8
|
|
|
|
486.3
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
(1,518
|
)
|
|
|
308.5-619.8
|
|
|
|
496.2
|
|
Lapsed or canceled
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
420.5
|
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
438.0-619.8
|
|
|
|
509.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,870
|
|
|
|
308.5-619.8
|
|
|
|
482.8
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
349.1-619.8
|
|
|
|
478.6
|
|
Lapsed or canceled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
349.1
|
|
|
|
349.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
308.5-619.8
|
|
|
|
489.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
308.5-619.8
|
|
|
|
489.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,870
|
|
|
|
308.5-619.8
|
|
|
|
482.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,635
|
|
|
|
308.5-619.8
|
|
|
|
486.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included within the options outstanding under the Executive
Share Option Plan are options over 902,412 (2009 2,001,060, 2008
2,424,605) shares that have not been recognized in accordance
with IFRS 2 as the options were granted on or before
November 7, 2002. These options, relating to former Six
Continents share schemes, have not been subsequently modified
and therefore do not need to be accounted for in accordance with
IFRS 2.
The weighted average share price at the date of exercise for
share options vested during the year was 1,063.8 pence. The
closing share price on December 31, 2010 was 1,243.0 pence
and the range during the year was 887.0 pence to 1,266.0 pence
per share.
Summarized information about options outstanding at
December 31, 2010 under the share option schemes is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding and exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
remaining
|
|
average
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
contract life
|
|
option price
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
(years)
|
|
(pence)
|
|
Range of exercise prices (pence)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Share Option Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308.5
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
308.5
|
|
422.8 to 494.2
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
460.7
|
|
619.8
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
619.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
489.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-76
|
|
Note 27
|
Operating
leases
|
During the year ended December 31, 2010, $53 million
(2009 $51 million, 2008 $61 million) was recognized as
an expense in the Consolidated income statement in respect of
operating leases, net of amounts borne by the System Fund.
Total commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
One to two years
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Two to three years
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Three to four years
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Four to five years
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
More than five years
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average remaining term of these leases, which generally
contain renewal options, is approximately 21 years (2009
19 years). No material restrictions or guarantees exist in
the Groups lease obligations.
Included above are commitments of $12 million (2009
$8 million) which will be borne by the System Fund.
Total future minimum rentals expected to be received under
non-cancellable sub-leases are $17 million (2009
$20 million).
|
|
Note 28
|
Capital
and other commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Contracts placed for expenditure on property, plant and
equipment and intangible assets not provided for in the
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Contingent liabilities not provided for in the Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In limited cases, the Group may provide performance guarantees
to third-party hotel owners to secure management contracts. The
maximum unprovided exposure under such guarantees was
$90 million at December 31, 2010 (2009
$106 million).
As of December 31, 2010, the Group had outstanding letters
of credit of $54 million (2009 $54 million) mainly
relating to self insurance programs.
The Group may guarantee loans made to facilitate third-party
ownership of hotels in which the Group has an equity interest
and also a management contract. As of December 31, 2010,
there were no such guarantees in place (2009 $22 million).
From time to time, the Group is subject to legal proceedings the
ultimate outcome of each being always subject to many
uncertainties inherent in litigation. The Group has also given
warranties in respect of the disposal of certain of its former
subsidiaries. It is the view of the Directors that, other than
to the extent that liabilities have been provided for in these
financial statements, such legal proceedings and warranties are
not expected to result in material financial loss to the Group.
F-77
|
|
Note 30
|
Related
party disclosures
|
Key management personnel comprises the Board and Executive
Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Total compensation of key management personnel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term employment benefits
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
Post-employment benefits
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation benefits
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no other transactions with key management personnel
during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 or 2008.
The Group operates a System Fund (the Fund) to
collect and administer assessments and contributions from hotel
owners for specific use in marketing, the Priority Club Rewards
loyalty program and the global reservation system. The Fund and
loyalty program are accounted for in accordance with the
accounting policies set out on
page F-21.
The following information is relevant to the operation of the
Fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Income:*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment fees and contributions received from hotels
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
Proceeds from sale of Priority Club Rewards points
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Key elements of expenditure:*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Priority Club
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
Payroll costs
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Net (deficit)/surplus for the year*
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Interest payable to the Fund
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Not included in the Consolidated
income statement in accordance with the Groups accounting
policies.
|
The payroll costs above relate to 3,927 (2008 4,019, 2008 3,853)
employees of the Group whose costs are borne by the Fund.
The following liabilities relating to the Fund are included in
the Consolidated statement of financial position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Cumulative short-term net surplus
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Loyalty program liability
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net change in the loyalty program liability and System Fund
surplus contributed an inflow of $10 million (2009
$42 million, 2008 $55 million) to the Groups
cash flow from operations.
F-78
INTERCONTINENTAL
HOTELS GROUP PLC
VALUATION
AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
beginning
|
|
costs and
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
end of
|
|
|
of period
|
|
expenses
|
|
differences
|
|
Deductions
|
|
period
|
|
|
($ million)
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for bad and doubtful debts
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for bad and doubtful debts
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for bad and doubtful debts
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
110
|
|
S-1
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on
Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this Annual Report on its behalf.
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP PLC
(Registrant)
Name: Richard Solomons
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: April 11, 2011