e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
Commission file number 001-34435
EMDEON INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-5799664 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
3055 Lebanon Pike, Suite 1000 |
|
|
Nashville, TN
|
|
37214 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(615) 932-3000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes
o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding as of November 5, 2010 |
Class A common stock, $0.00001 par value
|
|
90,869,542 |
Class B common stock, $0.00001 par value
|
|
24,689,142 |
Emdeon Inc.
Table of Contents
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
3
Emdeon Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
216,996 |
|
|
$ |
211,999 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,454
and $4,433 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
166,127 |
|
|
|
150,009 |
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
4,344 |
|
|
|
4,924 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
17,646 |
|
|
|
16,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
405,113 |
|
|
|
383,564 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
200,486 |
|
|
|
152,091 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
740,252 |
|
|
|
703,027 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
959,095 |
|
|
|
989,280 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
9,501 |
|
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,314,447 |
|
|
$ |
2,229,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
6,378 |
|
|
$ |
9,910 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
85,850 |
|
|
|
72,493 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
10,108 |
|
|
|
11,140 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
10,904 |
|
|
|
9,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
113,240 |
|
|
|
103,515 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
|
839,840 |
|
|
|
830,710 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
153,921 |
|
|
|
145,914 |
|
Tax receivable agreement obligations to related parties |
|
|
139,430 |
|
|
|
142,044 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
40,035 |
|
|
|
27,361 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (par value, $0.00001), 25,000,000 shares authorized and
0 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock (par value, $0.00001), 400,000,000 shares authorized
and 90,869,542 and 90,423,941 shares outstanding at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009 respectively |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Class B common stock, exchangeable (par value, $0.00001), 52,000,000 shares
authorized and 24,689,142 and 24,752,955 shares outstanding at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
745,276 |
|
|
|
730,941 |
|
Contingent consideration |
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(3,562 |
) |
|
|
(11,198 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
43,556 |
|
|
|
33,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emdeon Inc. equity |
|
|
787,226 |
|
|
|
753,448 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
240,755 |
|
|
|
226,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,027,981 |
|
|
|
979,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,314,447 |
|
|
$ |
2,229,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Emdeon Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
245,923 |
|
|
$ |
235,462 |
|
|
$ |
726,490 |
|
|
$ |
679,888 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization below) |
|
|
150,918 |
|
|
|
146,471 |
|
|
|
443,349 |
|
|
|
418,079 |
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
8,596 |
|
|
|
10,045 |
|
|
|
25,845 |
|
|
|
24,425 |
|
Sales, marketing, general and administrative |
|
|
28,494 |
|
|
|
34,305 |
|
|
|
80,856 |
|
|
|
85,888 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
30,001 |
|
|
|
26,667 |
|
|
|
87,054 |
|
|
|
77,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
27,914 |
|
|
|
17,974 |
|
|
|
89,386 |
|
|
|
74,445 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
16,163 |
|
|
|
17,219 |
|
|
|
47,747 |
|
|
|
52,330 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
14,125 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
45,791 |
|
|
|
22,196 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
7,498 |
|
|
|
9,245 |
|
|
|
27,650 |
|
|
|
12,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
6,627 |
|
|
|
(8,463 |
) |
|
|
18,141 |
|
|
|
9,311 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
|
|
8,289 |
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Emdeon Inc. |
|
$ |
3,737 |
|
|
$ |
(7,217 |
) |
|
$ |
9,852 |
|
|
$ |
6,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Class A common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
90,271,216 |
|
|
|
84,522,085 |
|
|
|
90,011,783 |
|
|
|
79,809,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
90,989,313 |
|
|
|
84,522,085 |
|
|
|
90,740,909 |
|
|
|
79,856,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Emdeon Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Contingent |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Controlling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Consideration |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
77,413,610 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
22,586,390 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
670,702 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,123 |
|
|
$ |
(23,195 |
) |
|
$ |
206,522 |
|
|
$ |
878,153 |
|
Capital contribution from stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
Distribution to stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(434 |
) |
Reclassification of liability awards
to equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,183 |
|
|
|
26,731 |
|
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
3,854 |
|
Purchase of eRx Network L.L.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,850,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
19,707 |
|
|
|
23,555 |
|
Issuance of Units of EBS Master to members
of management, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
18,245 |
|
|
|
6,660 |
|
Issuance of Class A common stock to
employees and directors, net of taxes |
|
|
349,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
Conversion of EBS Master Units held by eRx
to shares of Class A common stock,
net of taxes |
|
|
1,850,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,850,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
(17,443 |
) |
|
|
4,100 |
|
Issuance of Class A shares in connection with
IPO (includes costs paid in 2008) |
|
|
10,725,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,211 |
|
Issuance of Units of EBS Master to
Emdeon Inc., net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
(21,025 |
) |
|
|
(7,674 |
) |
Repurchase of Class A shares (to satisfy
tax withholding obligation) |
|
|
(101,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
Repurchase of units of EBS Master issued to
members of management, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(370,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(3,500 |
) |
|
|
(4,689 |
) |
Tax receivable agreement with related parties,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,556 |
) |
Issuance of Class A common stock upon
vesting of Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
2,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
9,311 |
|
Change in the fair value of
interest rate swap, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
4,918 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other comprehensive income amortization,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,072 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
90,238,893 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
24,752,955 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
732,836 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,563 |
|
|
$ |
(15,511 |
) |
|
$ |
213,852 |
|
|
$ |
961,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
90,423,941 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
24,752,955 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
730,941 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
33,704 |
|
|
$ |
(11,198 |
) |
|
$ |
226,421 |
|
|
$ |
979,869 |
|
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
|
12,691 |
|
Exchange of units of EBS Master to Class A
common stock, net of taxes |
|
|
36,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
Cancellation of Class B common stock,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Issuance of Class A common stock upon
vesting of Restricted Stock Units,
net of taxes |
|
|
47,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
Issuance of Class A common stock in
connection with acquisitions, net of
taxes |
|
|
361,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,365 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
7,033 |
|
Tax receivable agreements with related parties,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
Settlement of liability related to IPO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Contribution of data sublicense intangible to
EBS Master |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,289 |
|
|
|
18,141 |
|
Changes in the fair value of interest rate swap,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,587 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
5,836 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other comprehensive income
amortization, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
3,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,875 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
90,869,542 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
24,689,142 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
745,276 |
|
|
$ |
1,955 |
|
|
$ |
43,556 |
|
|
$ |
(3,562 |
) |
|
$ |
240,755 |
|
|
$ |
1,027,981 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Emdeon Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited and amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,141 |
|
|
$ |
9,311 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
87,054 |
|
|
|
77,051 |
|
Equity compensation expense |
|
|
12,691 |
|
|
|
21,499 |
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
7,870 |
|
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs |
|
|
9,536 |
|
|
|
8,842 |
|
Amortization of discontinued cash flow hedge from other comprehensive loss |
|
|
4,395 |
|
|
|
5,968 |
|
Change in contingent consideration |
|
|
(4,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(8,418 |
) |
|
|
(3,990 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
(5,691 |
) |
|
|
4,911 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(3,444 |
) |
|
|
3,515 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
(6,199 |
) |
Deferred revenues |
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
|
|
737 |
|
Tax receivable agreement obligations to related parties |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
120,840 |
|
|
|
121,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(63,835 |
) |
|
|
(30,563 |
) |
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(42,477 |
) |
|
|
(75,871 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(109,312 |
) |
|
|
(106,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from initial public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,261 |
|
Repurchase of Class A common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
Repurchase of Units of EBS Master LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,372 |
) |
Debt principal payments |
|
|
(5,663 |
) |
|
|
(21,663 |
) |
Payments on revolver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,201 |
) |
Payment of loan costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(796 |
) |
|
|
203 |
|
Distribution to shareholders |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(6,531 |
) |
|
|
108,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
123,511 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
211,999 |
|
|
|
71,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
216,996 |
|
|
$ |
194,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business and Organization
Nature of Business
Emdeon Inc. (the Company), through its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a provider of revenue
and payment cycle management solutions, connecting payers, providers and patients of the U.S.
healthcare system. The Companys product and service offerings integrate and automate key business
and administrative functions for healthcare payers and healthcare providers throughout the patient
encounter, including pre-care patient eligibility and benefits verification, clinical exchange
capabilities, claims management and adjudication, payment integrity, payment distribution, payment
posting and denial management, and patient billing and payment processing.
Organization
Prior to November 2006, the group of companies that comprised Emdeon Business Services (EBS)
was owned by HLTH Corporation, currently known as WebMD Health Corp. (WebMD). EBS Master LLC
(EBS Master) was formed by WebMD to act as a holding company for EBS. EBS Master, through its
100% owned subsidiary, Emdeon Business Services LLC (EBS LLC), owns EBS.
In September 2006, EBS Acquisition LLC (EBS Acquisition) was formed as a Delaware limited
liability company by affiliates of General Atlantic LLC (General Atlantic). On November 16, 2006,
pursuant to the terms of an Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November
15, 2006, among WebMD and certain of its subsidiaries (including EBS Master) and EBS Acquisition
and two of its subsidiaries, a subsidiary of EBS Acquisition merged into a subsidiary of WebMD. As
a result of the merger, EBS Acquisition acquired a 52% interest in EBS Master, and WebMD received
approximately $1.2 billion in cash and retained a 48% interest in EBS Master. The transactions
through which EBS Acquisition acquired a 52% interest in EBS Master are referred to herein as the
2006 Transaction. The 2006 Transaction was financed with $925,000 in bank debt and an equity
investment of approximately $320,000 by EBS Acquisition. As the 2006 Transaction was deemed to be a
highly leveraged transaction, the 2006 Transaction was accounted for in accordance with Emerging
Issues Task Force Issue No. 88-16, Basis in Leveraged Buyout Transactions, and 52% of the net
assets of EBS Master were stepped up to fair market value.
On February 8, 2008, WebMD sold its 48% noncontrolling interest in EBS Master to affiliates of
General Atlantic and Hellman & Friedman LLC (H&F) for $575,000 in cash (the 2008 Transaction).
As a result, following the 2008 Transaction, EBS Master was owned 65.77% by affiliates of General
Atlantic (including EBS Acquisition) and 34.23% by affiliates of H&F.
In September 2008, EBS Acquisition was converted into a Delaware corporation and its name was
changed to Emdeon Inc.
Reorganization
On August 5, 2009, the Company completed a restructuring (collectively, the reorganization
transactions) in anticipation of completing an initial public offering.
Prior to the reorganization transactions, the Company owned a 52% interest in EBS Master and
affiliates of General Atlantic and H&F owned the remaining 48% interest in EBS Master. The Company
did not engage in any business or other activities except in connection with its investment in EBS
Master and the reorganization transactions, and had nominal assets other than its interest in EBS Master.
8
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
In the reorganization transactions, the Company became the
sole managing member of EBS Master and acquired additional interests in EBS Master.
Prior to the reorganization transactions, the Company was authorized to issue a single class
of common stock. In connection with the reorganization transactions, the Company amended and
restated its certificate of incorporation and is currently authorized to issue two classes of
common stock: Class A common stock and Class B common stock.
This reorganization and the changes to the capital structure are reflected in all periods
presented.
Effective August 11, 2009, the Company priced its initial public offering of Class A common
stock (the IPO).
2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant New Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and, in the opinion of
management, reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results
for the unaudited interim periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for the interim period are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for the full fiscal year. All material
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform
to the current period presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2009-13, an update to FASB ASC Revenue Recognition Topic, which amends existing
accounting standards for revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements. To the extent a
deliverable within a multiple-element arrangement is not accounted for pursuant to other accounting
standards, the update establishes a selling price hierarchy that allows for the use of an estimated
selling price to determine the allocation of arrangement consideration to a deliverable in a
multiple element arrangement where neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party
evidence is available for that deliverable. The update is to be applied prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified after January 1, 2011 in the case of the
Company. The Company does not expect that the pending adoption of the update will have a
material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the clarification and additional disclosure provisions
of FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, an update to FASB ASC Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures Topic. This update clarifies that companies must provide fair value measurement
disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and expands the requirements to include
disclosure of amounts and reasons for transfers among different levels within the fair value
hierarchy and information within a reconciliation about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements
on a gross basis. The adoption of the clarification and additional disclosure provisions of this update had no material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. The disclosures required by this
9
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
update are presented within Note 8 to the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements. The remaining provisions become effective in the
fiscal period beginning after December 31, 2010 (January 1, 2011 in the case of the Company). The
Company does not expect that the pending adoption of the remaining provisions of the update will
have a material effect on the Companys disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.
3. Concentration of Credit Risk
The Companys revenue is primarily generated in the United States. Changes in economic
conditions, government regulations or demographic trends, among other matters, in the United States
could adversely affect the Companys revenue and results of operations.
The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalent balances in either insured depository
accounts or money market mutual funds. The money market mutual funds are limited to investments in
low-risk securities such as U.S. or government agency obligations, or repurchase agreements secured
by such securities.
4. Business Combinations
2009 Acquisitions
Sentinel Group Acquisition
On June 5, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of The Sentinel Group
from Optimal Business Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Trustmark Mutual Holding Company, for $3,067
in cash (which was funded with cash on hand). The Sentinel Group is a provider of payment integrity
solutions.
eRx Acquisition
On July 2, 2009, the Company acquired all of the voting equity interests of eRx Network,
L.L.C. (eRx). eRx is a provider of electronic pharmacy healthcare solutions. The Company valued
the total consideration transferred for the eRx acquisition at approximately $100,707, which
consisted of approximately $74,575 in cash, 1,850,000 EBS Master Units issued to certain members of
eRx, valued at $13.92 per unit or approximately $25,754 in the aggregate, and a working capital
settlement of approximately $378.
2010 Acquisitions
FVTech Acquisition
On January 26, 2010, the Company acquired all of the voting interest of FutureVision
Investment Group, L.L.C. and substantially all of the assets of two related companies, FVTech, Inc.
and FVTech Arizona, Inc. (collectively, FVTech).
FVTech is a provider of outsourced services specializing in electronic data conversion and
information management solutions.
The Company has valued the total consideration transferred at $34,158, which consisted of
$20,005 cash at closing, estimated contingent consideration of $13,850 and a working capital
settlement of $303. The contingent consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay additional consideration ranging from $0 to $40,000 based
upon the financial performance of the acquired business for the two and three year periods
following the acquisition. The Company has valued the contingent consideration at the acquisition
date, using a probability-weighted
10
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
discounted cash flow model, at $13,850. This fair value
measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level
3 measurement. The key assumptions in applying the income approach were as follows: 11.6% discount
rate and a FVTech performance measure during the earnout period of between approximately $1,500 and
$27,000. Through September 30, 2010, the Company has lowered its range of the FVTech performance
measure during the earnout period which, combined with the reduced impact of discounting, resulted
in a net increase to pre-tax income of $2,270 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the acquisition date.
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
372 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
1,736 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
35 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
18,423 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
29 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts (16-year weighted average useful life) |
|
|
560 |
|
Tradename (3-year weighted average useful life) |
|
|
160 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
14,038 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(338 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(550 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred |
|
$ |
34,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs reflected within sales, marketing, general and
administrative expenses in the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of the acquisition date, FVTech had gross contractual accounts receivable of $1,774, of
which approximately $38 is not expected to be collected.
The goodwill recorded in the FVTech acquisition was assigned to the Companys payer services
and provider services segments based on revenue effects the acquisition is expected to have on each
respective segment. The goodwill recognized is attributable to expected synergies and the assembled
workforce of FVTech. The Company expects that approximately $18,700 of goodwill attributable to the
FVTech acquisition is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
HTMS Acquisition
On March 24, 2010, the Company acquired Healthcare Technology Management Services, Inc.
(HTMS), a consulting company focused primarily on the healthcare payer market.
11
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Company has preliminarily valued the total consideration transferred at $18,710, which
consisted of: (i) $7,841 in cash and 152,532 shares of Class A common stock (fair value of $2,263)
paid at closing, (ii) estimated contingent consideration of $8,230 and (iii) an estimated working
capital settlement of $409. The contingent consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay,
to the extent a financial performance target is achieved, additional specified amounts in cash
related to each of the calendar years 2010, 2011 and 2012. The Company has valued the contingent
consideration at the acquisition date, using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model, at
$8,230. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and
thus represents a Level 3 measurement. The key assumptions in applying the income approach at the
acquisition date were as follows: 20.5% discount rate and a probability of achieving the specified
financial target of 80%, 90%, and 90% for each of the calendar years 2010, 2011 and 2012,
respectively. Through September 30, 2010, the Company has lowered the probability of HTMS achieving
the 2010 financial performance target. This change in probability, combined with the reduced
impact of discounting, resulted in a net increase to pre-tax income of $1,060 for the nine month
period ended September 30, 2010.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The preliminary values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are subject to change based on the outcome of a working capital settlement
(expected to be finalized in 2011).
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
3,270 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Tradename (3-year weighted average useful life) |
|
|
190 |
|
Noncompetition agreements (5-year weighted average useful life) |
|
|
3,150 |
|
Backlog (1-year weighted average useful life) |
|
|
1,630 |
|
Goodwill (Provisional) |
|
|
12,414 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,786 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred |
|
$ |
18,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs reflected within sales, marketing, general and administrative
expenses in the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of the acquisition date, HTMS had gross contractual accounts receivable of $3,286, of which
approximately $16 is not expected to be collected.
The goodwill recorded in the HTMS acquisition was assigned to the Companys payer services
segment. The goodwill recognized is attributable to expected synergies and the assembled workforce
of HTMS. The Company expects that approximately $9,100 of goodwill attributable to the HTMS
acquisition will be deductible for income tax purposes.
Chapin Revenue Cycle Management, LLC
On June 21, 2010, the Company acquired all of the equity interests of Chapin Revenue Cycle
Management, LLC (Chapin), a technology-enabled provider of hospital-based revenue cycle services.
12
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Company has preliminarily valued the total consideration transferred at $22,933, which
consisted of (i) $16,096 in cash and 209,026 shares of Emdeon Inc. Class A common stock (fair value
of $2,554) paid at closing, (ii) estimated contingent consideration of $3,885 and (iii) an
estimated working capital settlement of $398. The contingent consideration arrangement requires the
Company to issue, to the extent that certain financial performance targets are achieved, a maximum
of 627,080 additional shares of Class A common stock to the former owners of Chapin. These shares
are generally issuable in installments in each of the three years following the acquisition, to the
extent that the specified financial performance measures are achieved with respect to those years.
The Company has valued the contingent consideration at the acquisition date at $3,885 (including
$1,955 classified within equity). This value was estimated as the product of a probability-weighted
number of shares to be issued and the fair value of the Class A common stock at the acquisition
date, as reduced by a discount for lack of marketability. This fair value measurement is based on
significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. The key
assumptions in estimating this fair value are as follows: closing price of the Class A common
stock on the acquisition date of $13.28, discount for lack of marketability of 8% and a probability
of achieving the specified financial performance targets of between 20% and 70%. Through
September 30, 2010, the Company has lowered its range of the Chapin performance measures during the
first earnout period which, combined with the reduced impact of discounting, resulted in a net
increase to pre-tax income of $810.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The preliminary values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are subject to change based on the receipt of a final valuation of intangible
assets and the outcome of a working capital settlement (expected to be finalized in 2011).
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
62 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
1,681 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
46 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
3,065 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
12 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Tradename (2-year weighted average useful life) |
|
|
50 |
|
Noncompetition agreements (5-year weighted average useful life) |
|
|
3,350 |
|
Customer contracts (9 -year weighted average useful life) |
|
|
4,640 |
|
Goodwill (Provisional) |
|
|
10,521 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(146 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred |
|
$ |
22,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs reflected within sales, marketing, general and administrative
expenses in the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of the acquisition date, Chapin had gross contractual accounts receivable of $1,720, of
which $39 is not expected to be collected.
The goodwill recorded in the Chapin acquisition was assigned to the Companys provider
services segment. The goodwill recognized is attributable to expected synergies and the assembled
workforce of Chapin. The Company expects that approximately $17,400 of goodwill attributable to the
Chapin acquisition will be deductible for tax purposes.
13
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer |
|
|
Provider |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
303,650 |
|
|
$ |
315,647 |
|
|
$ |
83,730 |
|
|
$ |
703,027 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
18,451 |
|
|
|
18,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,973 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
322,101 |
|
|
$ |
334,169 |
|
|
$ |
83,982 |
|
|
$ |
740,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization as of September 30, 2010 consist of the following:
Amortization expense was $50,255 and $46,101 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Aggregate future
amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Life |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Customer relationships |
|
15.2 |
|
$ |
970,722 |
|
|
$ |
(162,003 |
) |
|
$ |
808,719 |
|
Trade names |
|
17.1 |
|
|
117,948 |
|
|
|
(18,882 |
) |
|
|
99,066 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
4.4 |
|
|
17,996 |
|
|
|
(11,534 |
) |
|
|
6,462 |
|
Data sublicense agreement |
|
7.3 |
|
|
49,600 |
|
|
|
(5,532 |
) |
|
|
44,068 |
|
Backlog |
|
0.5 |
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,157,896 |
|
|
$ |
(198,801 |
) |
|
$ |
959,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (remainder) |
|
$ |
17,069 |
|
2011 |
|
|
67,008 |
|
2012 |
|
|
66,619 |
|
2013 |
|
|
66,406 |
|
2014 |
|
|
66,356 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
675,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
959,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
14
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
6. Long-Term Debt
As of September 30, 2010, long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Credit Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$755 million First
Lien Term Loan
facility, expiring
on November 16,
2013, bearing
interest payable
quarterly at a
variable base rate
(LIBOR) plus a
spread rate (total
rate 2.38% and
2.26%) and net of
unamortized discount
of $30,974 and
$38,105 at September
30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009,
respectively
(effective interest
rate of 3.99% at
September 30, 2010) |
|
|
649,713 |
|
|
|
648,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$170 million Second
Lien Term Loan
facility, expiring
on May 16, 2014,
bearing interest at
a variable base rate
(LIBOR) plus a
spread rate (total
rate 5.38% and
5.26%) and net of
unamortized discount
of $12,916 and
$15,169 at September
30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009,
respectively
(effective interest
rate of 7.98% at
September 30, 2010) |
|
|
157,084 |
|
|
|
154,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation under data sublicense agreement |
|
|
43,947 |
|
|
|
37,606 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(10,904 |
) |
|
|
(9,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
839,840 |
|
|
$ |
830,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2006, EBS LLC entered into two credit agreements with several lenders that
provided a $755,000 term loan (First Lien Term Loan), a $50,000 revolving credit agreement
(Revolver) and a $170,000 term loan (Second Lien Term Loan). In connection with these credit
agreements, EBS LLC paid fees of approximately $17,900 to the lenders of which the unamortized
portion is classified as a reduction of the carrying value of the credit agreements in each period.
Additionally, in connection with the 2008 Transaction, 48% of the carrying value of these credit
agreements was adjusted to fair value which resulted in a discount of $66,395, the unamortized
portion of which has similarly been classified as a reduction of the carrying value of the credit
agreements.
The Revolver expires November 2012 and provides for revolving loans not to exceed $50,000, of
which $12,000 may be used for letters of credit in support of payment obligations of the Company.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had no borrowings outstanding, undrawn letters of credit
totaling $4,250 and $45,750 available for future borrowings under the Revolver. The Company pays a
quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolver that fluctuates, based upon certain
leverage ratios, between 0.375% and 0.5% per annum.
The First Lien Term Loan is payable in quarterly principal installments of approximately
$1,800, plus accrued interest, beginning in March 2007 through September 2013, with a balloon
payment of the remaining principal amount outstanding due upon maturity in November 2013. These
installment payments are subject to adjustment based upon optional and
mandatory prepayment activity. Mandatory prepayments of principal related to excess cash flow,
as defined, and other circumstances are also required.
The Second Lien Term Loan is subordinate to the First Lien Term Loan and matures in May 2014.
15
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
In October 2010, the Company borrowed an additional $100,000 under an incremental term loan
facility through an amendment to the First Lien Term Loan (see Note 18).
The credit agreements require EBS LLC to maintain certain financial covenants, including a
maximum total leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio. The credit agreements also impose
restrictions related to capital expenditures, investments, additional debt or liens, asset sales,
transactions with affiliates and equity interests, among other items. Additionally, the credit
agreements include restrictions on the payment of dividends or distributions (other than to fund
income tax liabilities) to or advances or loans to parties that are not party to the credit
agreements. In the case of dividends, the credit agreements generally limit payments to non-loan
parties (including the Company) with such limitations increasing based on achievement of certain
leverage ratios. Transactions with affiliates are limited to those which are approved by a majority
of the non-interested members of the EBS LLC board of directors and whose terms are no less
favorable than those available to an unrelated person. Substantially all of the Companys net
assets are subject to the restrictions of these credit agreements. EBS LLC believes it was in
compliance with all debt covenants at September 30, 2010. This debt is secured by substantially all
of the assets of EBS LLC.
Obligation Under Data Sublicense Agreement
In October 2009, the Company acquired certain additional rights to specified uses of its data
from WebMD in order to broaden the Companys ability to pursue business intelligence and data
analytics solutions for payers and providers. The Company previously licensed exclusive rights to
this data to WebMD pursuant to an Amended and Restated Data License Agreement in connection with
the 2008 Transaction. The Company has recorded an amortizable intangible asset and a corresponding
obligation related to this agreement.
In April 2010, the Company exercised an option to acquire certain additional rights to
specified uses of its data from WebMD. The Company recorded an additional amortizable intangible
asset with an estimated life of approximately eight years and an obligation of approximately $6,300
based on the present value of the scheduled annual payments through 2018.
7. Interest Rate Swap
Derivative financial instruments are used to manage the Companys interest rate exposure. The
Company does not enter into financial instruments for speculative purposes. Derivative financial
instruments are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Derivatives and Hedging Topic and are
measured at fair value and recorded on the balance sheet. For derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the
derivative
instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings
in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods
during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (for example, in interest expense when the
hedged transactions are interest cash flows associated with floating-rate debt). The remaining gain
or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of
future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is recognized in interest expense in current earnings
during the period of change.
16
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the fair value of the Companys derivative instrument at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
Asset (Liability) Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
$ |
(14,646 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
In December 2006, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement, which matures in
December 2011, to reduce the variability of interest payments associated with its total long-term
debt. The notional amount of the swap was $352,369 and $355,200 as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. Changes in the cash flows of the interest rate swap are intended
to offset the changes in cash flows attributable to fluctuations in the variable base rates
underlying the Companys long-term debt obligations. As of September 30, 2010, $12,411 of net
losses associated with the existing cash flow hedge, which have been recorded within accumulated
other comprehensive income, are expected to be reclassified to interest expense within the next
twelve months.
The 2008 Transaction represented a redesignation event. As the Companys interest rate swap
did not meet all the criteria for hedge accounting at that time, changes in the fair value
subsequent to the 2008 Transaction but prior to its redesignation as a cash flow hedge on September
30, 2008 were recorded within interest expense during the period from February 8, 2008 to September
30, 2008. Additionally, the amortization of the amounts reflected in other comprehensive income at
the date of the 2008 Transaction related to the discontinued cash flow hedge are and continue to be
reflected within interest expense in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements
of operations. Amortization of amounts included in other comprehensive income related to the
discontinued original hedge is expected to total approximately $4,450 over the next twelve months.
The effect of the derivative instrument on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain related to
effective portion of
derivative recognized
in other comprehensive
loss |
|
$ |
2,224 |
|
|
$ |
1,113 |
|
|
$ |
6,690 |
|
|
$ |
5,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain related to
effective portion of
derivative
reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive loss to
interest expense |
|
$ |
5,460 |
|
|
$ |
7,338 |
|
|
$ |
16,712 |
|
|
$ |
20,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Effective October 1, 2010, the Company removed the designation of its interest rate swap
agreement as a cash flow hedge. Accordingly, all subsequent changes in the fair value of the
interest rate swap during each quarter are expected to be recorded within interest expense.
8. Fair Value Measurements
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Companys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis
consist principally of the Companys derivative financial instrument and contingent consideration
associated with business combinations. The table below presents the Companys assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010, aggregated by the
level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted in |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Description |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
Identical (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Interest Rate Swap |
|
$ |
(14,646 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(14,646 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Contingent Consideration
Obligations |
|
|
(19,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(34,516 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(14,646 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The valuation of the Companys derivative financial instrument is determined using widely
accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows
of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the
period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The
fair value of the interest rate swap is determined using the market standard methodology of netting
the discounted future fixed cash payments (or receipts) and the discounted expected variable cash
receipts (or payments). The variable cash receipts (or payments) are based on an expectation of
future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.
The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own
nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of
nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit
enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its
derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and by its counterparties. However, as of September
30, 2010, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit
valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result,
the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level
2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The valuation of the Companys contingent consideration obligations is determined using a
probability weighted discounted cash flow method. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of
the purchase agreements (e.g., minimum and maximum payments, length
18
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
of earn-out periods, manner of calculating any amounts due, etc.) and
utilizes assumptions with regard to future cash flows, probabilities of achieving such future cash
flows and a discount rate.
The table below presents a reconciliation of the fair value of our liabilities that use
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
For the Nine |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
(21,875 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Issuances of contingent consideration |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(24,010 |
) |
Total changes included in other income (loss) |
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
(19,870 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value upon Initial Recognition
The carrying amount and the estimated fair value of financial instruments held by the Company
as of September 30, 2010 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
216,996 |
|
|
$ |
216,996 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
166,127 |
|
|
$ |
166,127 |
|
Long-term debt (credit facilities) |
|
$ |
806,797 |
|
|
$ |
830,165 |
|
Cost method investment |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,800 |
|
The carrying amounts of cash equivalents and accounts receivable approximate fair value
because of their short-term maturities. The fair value of long-term debt is based upon market
trades by investors in partial interests of these instruments. The fair value of the cost method
investment is estimated using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model.
9. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various claims and legal
proceedings. While the ultimate resolution of these matters has yet to be determined, the Company
does not believe that their outcomes will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
19
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
10. Capital Stock
Common Stock
Under the Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the Company is
authorized to issue 400,000,000 shares of Class A common stock and 52,000,000 shares of Class B
common stock, each with a par value of $0.00001 per share. The Class A common stock and Class B
common stock each provide holders with one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders;
however, the holders of Class B common stock do not have any of the economic rights (including
rights to dividends and distributions upon liquidation) provided to the holders of the Class A
common stock. Shares of Class B common stock, together with corresponding EBS Master Units, may be
exchanged with the Company for shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to
customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and reclassifications. All
shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock generally vote together, as a single class,
on all matters submitted to a vote of the Companys stockholders.
Preferred Stock
Under the Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the Company is
authorized to issue 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.00001 per share.
Initial Public Offering
On August 11, 2009, the Company priced the IPO of its Class A common stock pursuant to a
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-153451), as amended, and Registration Statement on
Form S-1MEF (File No. 333-161270) (collectively, the Registration Statements) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In the IPO, an aggregate of 27,255,000 shares of Class A common
stock, consisting of 10,725,000 Class A shares registered on behalf of the Company and 16,530,000
Class A shares registered on behalf of selling stockholders (including 3,555,000 Class A shares
representing an over-allotment option granted by the selling stockholders to the underwriters in
the IPO) were offered and sold to the public at a price per share of $15.50. The IPO closed on
August 17, 2009, and the Company raised a total of approximately $166,238 in gross proceeds from
the IPO, or $144,915 in net proceeds after deducting underwriting commissions and other associated
costs (including approximately $3,100 of offering expenses paid in 2008).
20
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Noncontrolling Interests
The Company has executed transactions that both increased and decreased its ownership interest
in EBS Master. These changes are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income attributable to Emdeon Inc. |
|
$ |
9,852 |
|
|
$ |
6,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from the noncontrolling interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for the issuance of 1,850,000 EBS Units in
connection with the acquisition of eRx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,530 |
|
Decrease in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for the issuance of 2,537,325 EBS Units to
management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,979 |
) |
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for the issuance of 10,703,406 EBS Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,358 |
|
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital related to exchange of EBS Units held by
eRx selling stockholders for shares of Emdeon Inc. Class A common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,919 |
|
Decrease in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for purchase of 370,760 EBS Units from
management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for issuance of 361,558 EBS Master
Units in connection with the acquisition of HTMS and Chapin |
|
|
4,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for issuance of 47,214 EBS Master Units in
connection with vesting of restricted Class A common stock units of Emdeon Inc. |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for exchange of 36,829 EBS Master
Units to Class A common stock of Emdeon Inc. |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for cancellation of 26,984 EBS Master Units |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfers from noncontrolling interest |
|
|
5,043 |
|
|
|
26,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change from net income attributable to Emdeon Inc. and transfers from noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
14,895 |
|
|
$ |
33,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Equity-Based Compensation Plans
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 283,035 restricted Class A
common stock units and 1,417,200 options to purchase Class A common stock to certain of the
Companys employees and directors with an aggregate grant date fair value of $15,345. These
restricted Class A common stock units and options to purchase Class A common stock generally vest
ratably over a four-year period.
The Emdeon Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) became effective July 1, 2010. Under
the ESPP, the Company is authorized to issue up to 8,900,000 shares of Class A common stock to
qualifying employees. Eligible employees may direct the Company, during each six month option
period, to withhold between 1% and 10% of their base pay, the proceeds from which are used to
purchase shares of Class A common stock at a price equal to the lesser of 85% of the closing market
price on the exercise date or the grant date. For accounting purposes, the ESPP is considered a
compensatory plan such that the Company recognizes equity-based compensation expense based on the
fair value of the options held by the employees to purchase the Companys shares.
21
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized equity-based
compensation expense of $12,691 and $21,499, respectively.
12. Income Taxes
Income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to an expense of
$27,650 and $12,885, respectively. The Companys effective tax rate was 60.4% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 compared with 58.1% during the same period in 2009. The Companys
effective tax rate is affected by deferred tax expense resulting from differences between the book
and income tax basis of its investment in EBS Master, as well by changes in the Companys valuation
allowances. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against $337,272 of state net operating
losses and $7,935 of capital losses as of September 30, 2010. Changes in these valuation
allowances resulted in $1,140 and $6,902 of additional income tax expense for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $1,898 of income tax expense and $8,123 of income
tax benefit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized benefit January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
5,982 |
|
Increase in nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized benefit September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
7,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company increased its liability for uncertain tax positions by $1,853 during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 which was primarily related to state net operating losses (recorded
as an adjustment to the valuation allowance), that if recognized, would affect the effective income
tax rate.
The Company does not currently anticipate that the total amount of unrecognized tax
positions will significantly increase or decrease in the next twelve months.
The Company recognizes interest income and expense (if any) related to income taxes as a
component of income tax expense.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and
various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Companys U.S. federal and state income tax returns
for the tax years 2007 and beyond remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
With respect to state and local jurisdictions and countries outside of the United States, the
Company and its subsidiaries are typically subject to examination for a number of years after the
income tax returns have been filed. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the
Company believes that adequate amounts of tax, interest and penalties have been provided for in the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for any adjustments that may be
incurred due to state, local or foreign audits.
13. Tax Receivable Agreement Obligation to Related Parties
In connection with the IPO, the Company entered into tax receivable agreements which obligate
the Company to make payments to certain parties affiliated with General Atlantic, H&F and former
EBS Master Grant Unit holders generally equal to 85% of the applicable cash savings that the
Company realizes as a result of tax attributes arising from the 2006 Transaction, the 2008
Transaction and the former EBS Master Grant Unit holders exchange of EBS Master Units for cash or
shares of Class A common stock. The Company will retain the benefit of the remaining 15% of these
tax savings.
22
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
All future exchanges of EBS Master Units for cash or shares of Class A common stock related to
the affiliates of General Atlantic, H&F and the former EBS Master Grant Unit holders who are
parties to the tax receivable agreements are expected to result in an additional tax receivable
obligation for the Company with a corresponding offset to the Companys additional paid in capital
account. Subsequent adjustments of the tax receivable obligations due to certain events (e.g.,
realization of net operating losses, tax rate changes or the timing of cash settlement obligations)
are expected to result in a corresponding adjustment of the Companys net income. As a result of
changes in the Companys income tax rate during the period, the Company recognized changes in
estimate related to this obligation of approximately $1,162 (decrease to pre-tax income) and $318
(increase to pre-tax income) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010,
respectively.
23
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
14. Net Income Per Share
The following tables sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share of Class A common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Emdeon Inc. |
|
$ |
3,737 |
|
|
$ |
(7,217 |
) |
|
$ |
9,852 |
|
|
$ |
6,440 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
90,271,216 |
|
|
|
84,522,085 |
|
|
|
90,011,783 |
|
|
|
79,809,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss excluding EBS Master |
|
$ |
(6,822 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,346 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,324 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,804 |
) |
Weighted average effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emdeon Inc. allocation of EBS Master net
income |
|
|
10,563 |
|
|
|
(4,011 |
) |
|
|
30,107 |
|
|
|
10,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,741 |
|
|
$ |
(7,357 |
) |
|
$ |
9,783 |
|
|
$ |
6,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in basic computation |
|
|
90,271,216 |
|
|
|
84,522,085 |
|
|
|
90,011,783 |
|
|
|
79,809,140 |
|
Weighted average effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Class A common stock units |
|
|
124,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,951 |
|
|
|
47,448 |
|
Contingently issuable Class A common stock |
|
|
593,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
651,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,989,313 |
|
|
|
84,522,085 |
|
|
|
90,740,909 |
|
|
|
79,856,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to their antidilutive effect, the following securities have been excluded from diluted net income per share for the respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Class B common stock |
|
|
23,474,722 |
|
|
|
23,658,441 |
|
|
|
23,430,654 |
|
|
|
22,947,667 |
|
Options to purchase Class A common stock |
|
|
5,875,887 |
|
|
|
2,588,881 |
|
|
|
5,541,234 |
|
|
|
872,443 |
|
Restricted Class A common stock units |
|
|
468,853 |
|
|
|
142,344 |
|
|
|
422,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, 627,080 contingently issuable shares of Class A common stock have
been excluded from diluted net income per share for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2010
because the contingencies have not been resolved.
24
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
15. Loss on Abandonment of Leased Properties
During 2009, the Company ceased use of certain properties in Jessup, Maryland and Largo,
Florida. During 2008, the Company ceased use of property subject to operating leases in Nashville,
Tennessee and Scottsdale, Arizona.
The following table summarizes the activity related to these contract termination costs
for nine months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,170 |
|
Costs incurred |
|
|
(408 |
) |
Costs paid or otherwise settled |
|
|
(1,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
The estimate of the original loss, changes in expected timing and amounts of cash flows and
all subsequent amortization associated with the abandonment of these operating leases, is
classified within sales, general and administrative expense in the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had incurred
cumulative costs associated with the abandonment of these operating leases of $4,347.
16. Segment Reporting
Management views the Companys operating results in three reportable segments: (a) payer
services, (b) provider services and (c) pharmacy services. Listed below are the results of
operations for each of the reportable segments. This information is reflected in the manner
utilized by management to make operating decisions, assess performance and allocate resources.
Segment assets are not presented to management for purposes of operational decision making, and
therefore are not included in the accompanying tables. The accounting policies of the reportable
segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in the
notes to the Companys 2009 audited consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Payer Services Segment
The payer services segment provides payment cycle solutions to healthcare payers, both
directly and through the Companys channel partners, that simplify the administration of healthcare
related to insurance eligibility and benefit verification, claims filing, payment integrity and
claims and payment distribution. Additionally, the payer services segment provides consulting
services primarily to healthcare payers.
Provider Services Segment
The provider services segment provides revenue cycle management solutions, patient billing and
payment services and clinical exchange capabilities to healthcare providers, both directly and
through the Companys channel partners, that simplify the providers revenue cycle, reduce related
costs and improve cash flow.
Pharmacy Services Segment
The pharmacy services segment provides electronic prescribing services and other electronic
solutions to pharmacies, pharmacy benefit management companies, government agencies and other
payers related to prescription benefit claim filing, adjudication and management.
25
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Other
Inter-segment revenue and expenses primarily represent claims management and patient statement
services provided between segments.
Corporate and eliminations includes personnel and other costs associated with the Companys
management, administrative and other corporate services functions and eliminations to remove
inter-segment revenues and expenses.
The revenue and total segment contribution for the reportable segments are as follows:
26
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer |
|
|
Provider |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
49,438 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,438 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
58,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,369 |
|
Patient statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,920 |
|
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,064 |
|
Dental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,925 |
|
Pharmacy services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,207 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
108,565 |
|
|
|
117,992 |
|
|
|
20,207 |
|
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
245,923 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
71,206 |
|
|
|
72,710 |
|
|
|
7,811 |
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
150,918 |
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
2,873 |
|
|
|
3,943 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,596 |
|
Sales, marketing, general
and administrative |
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
7,526 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
13,076 |
|
|
|
28,494 |
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution |
|
$ |
28,053 |
|
|
$ |
33,813 |
|
|
$ |
9,157 |
|
|
$ |
(13,108 |
) |
|
|
57,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,001 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,163 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer |
|
|
Provider |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
46,072 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46,072 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
53,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,345 |
|
Patient statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,840 |
|
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,041 |
|
Dental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,978 |
|
Pharmacy services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
Inter-segment revenue |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
99,714 |
|
|
|
117,275 |
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
235,462 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
65,805 |
|
|
|
75,070 |
|
|
|
6,158 |
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
146,471 |
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
3,847 |
|
|
|
4,297 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,045 |
|
Sales, marketing, general and
administrative |
|
|
8,037 |
|
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
|
13,817 |
|
|
|
34,305 |
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution |
|
$ |
22,025 |
|
|
$ |
28,870 |
|
|
$ |
7,714 |
|
|
$ |
(13,968 |
) |
|
|
44,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,667 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer |
|
|
Provider |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
145,090 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
145,090 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
171,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,693 |
|
Patient statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,214 |
|
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,855 |
|
Dental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,808 |
|
Pharmacy services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,830 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
319,094 |
|
|
|
350,118 |
|
|
|
59,830 |
|
|
|
(2,552 |
) |
|
|
726,490 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
208,231 |
|
|
|
215,785 |
|
|
|
21,790 |
|
|
|
(2,457 |
) |
|
|
443,349 |
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
8,938 |
|
|
|
11,607 |
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,845 |
|
Sales, marketing, general
and administrative |
|
|
19,422 |
|
|
|
21,049 |
|
|
|
4,520 |
|
|
|
35,865 |
|
|
|
80,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution |
|
$ |
82,503 |
|
|
$ |
101,677 |
|
|
$ |
28,220 |
|
|
$ |
(35,960 |
) |
|
|
176,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,054 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,747 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer |
|
|
Provider |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
137,440 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
137,440 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
156,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,433 |
|
Patient statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,304 |
|
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,825 |
|
Dental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,690 |
|
Pharmacy services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,196 |
|
Inter-segment revenue |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
294,307 |
|
|
|
347,207 |
|
|
|
40,196 |
|
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
|
|
679,888 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
188,094 |
|
|
|
221,464 |
|
|
|
9,947 |
|
|
|
(1,426 |
) |
|
|
418,079 |
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
9,172 |
|
|
|
11,283 |
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,425 |
|
Sales, marketing, general and
administrative |
|
|
20,461 |
|
|
|
24,335 |
|
|
|
5,439 |
|
|
|
35,653 |
|
|
|
85,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution |
|
$ |
76,580 |
|
|
$ |
90,125 |
|
|
$ |
20,840 |
|
|
$ |
(36,049 |
) |
|
|
151,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,051 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
17. Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
The following is a summary of the accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income balances, net of taxes and
noncontrolling interest, as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
Net Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
on Cash Flow |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Hedging |
|
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,439 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,727 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,198 |
) |
Change associated with foreign currency
translation |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
Change associated with current period hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,736 |
) |
Reclassification into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,317 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
15,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
(3,724 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Subsequent Event
Chamberlin Edmonds Acquisition
On October 1, 2010, the Company acquired all of the equity interests of Chamberlin Edmonds
Holdings Inc. and Chamberlin Edmonds & Associates, Inc. (collectively, Chamberlin), a provider of
government program eligibility and enrollment services. The acquisition will allow the Company to
use Chamberlins technology-enabled services to assist hospitals in lowering the incidence of
uncompensated care, reducing bad-debt expense and increasing overall cash flow. Under the terms
of the merger agreement, the purchase price was $260,000 in cash, which consisted of: (i) payments of
$209,522 to former stockholders of Chamberlin and $44,502 in satisfaction of
Chamberlins debt and transaction related obligations and (ii) other transaction related
adjustments benefitting the Company of $5,976.
The Company has preliminarily valued the total consideration transferred at $209,522, which is
subject to change based on the outcome of a working capital settlement.
The initial accounting for this acquisition was incomplete as of the date of this report. As
such, certain of the disclosures for business combinations occurring after the balance sheet date,
but before the financial statements are issued, are not disclosed herein. These disclosures
include: (i) the amounts of revenues and earnings of Chamberlin since the acquisition date that are
included in the consolidated statements of operations for the reporting period; (ii) the revenue
and earnings of the combined entity for the current reporting period as though the acquisition had
occurred as of the beginning of the current period; (iii) the revenue and earnings of the combined
entity for the comparable prior reporting period as though the acquisition had occurred as of the
beginning of the comparable prior period; and (iv) the amounts recognized as of the acquisition
date for each major class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (including goodwill). Based
on the date of this acquisition, (i) above is not applicable as the latest reporting date is prior
to the date of the acquisition. As it relates to items (ii), (iii) and (iv) above, the disclosure
of each is dependent upon the completion of a valuation of the tangible and intangible assets
acquired and/or liabilities assumed.
29
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Amendment to First Lien Credit Agreement
On
October 1, 2010, the Company, through certain of its
subsidiaries, borrowed an additional $100,000 under an incremental term loan facility through
an amendment to the First Lien Credit Agreement. The incremental term loan facility bears interest
at the Companys option at either an adjusted LIBOR rate plus 3.00% (subject to a LIBOR floor of
1.50%) or the lenders alternate base rate plus 2.00% (subject to an alternate base rate floor of
2.50%). Other than the interest rate, the incremental term loans are on substantially the same
terms as the Companys existing First Lien Term Loan. The proceeds of the borrowing under the
incremental term loans were used to partially finance the acquisition of Chamberlin.
30
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included in Part I, Item 1
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Quarterly Report), together with the risk factors
contained in the section titled Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (Form 10-K) and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references in this Quarterly
Report to we, us, our, Emdeon and the Company refer to Emdeon Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should not place undue reliance on those
statements because they are subject to numerous uncertainties and factors relating to our
operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are
beyond our control. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or
assumed future results of operations, including descriptions of our business strategy. These
statements often include words such as may, will, should, believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, estimate or similar expressions. These statements are based upon assumptions
that we have made in light of our experience in the industry, as well as our perceptions of
historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe
are appropriate under the circumstances. As you read this Quarterly Report, you should understand
that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. They involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are
based upon reasonable assumptions, you should be aware that many factors could affect our actual
financial results or results of operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from
those in the forward-looking statements. For further information about these and other factors that
could affect our future results, please see the risk factors contained in the section titled Risk
Factors in our Form 10-K and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2010.
Our forward looking statements made herein speak only as of the date on which made. We
expressly disclaim any intent, obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking
statements made herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change
in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements are based. All subsequent
written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are
expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this Quarterly
Report.
Overview
We are a leading provider of revenue and payment cycle management solutions, connecting
payers, providers and patients in the U.S. healthcare system. Our product and service offerings
integrate and automate key business and administrative functions of our payer and provider
customers throughout the patient encounter, including pre-care patient eligibility and benefits
verification, clinical exchange capabilities, claims management and adjudication, payment
integrity, payment distribution, payment posting and denial management and patient billing and
payment processing. Our customers are able to improve efficiency, reduce costs, increase cash flow
and more efficiently manage the complex revenue and payment cycle process by using our
comprehensive suite of products and services.
We deliver our solutions and operate our business in three business segments: (i) payer
services, which provides solutions to commercial insurance companies, third party administrators
and governmental payers; (ii) provider services, which provides services to hospitals,
31
physicians,
dentists and other healthcare providers, such as labs and home healthcare providers; and (iii)
pharmacy services, which provides services to pharmacies, pharmacy benefit management companies,
government agencies and other payers. Through our payer services segment, we provide payment cycle
solutions, both directly and through our network of companies with which we have contracted to
market and sell some of our products and services, including healthcare information system vendors,
such as physician practice management system, hospital information system, payer administration
system and electronic medical record vendors (channel partners). These payment cycle solutions
simplify the administration of healthcare related to insurance eligibility and benefit
verification, claims filing, payment integrity and claims and payment distribution. Additionally,
we provide consulting services through our payer services segment. Through our provider services
segment, we provide revenue cycle management solutions, patient billing and payment services and
clinical exchange capabilities, both directly and through our channel partners, that simplify
providers revenue cycle, reduce related costs and improve cash flow. Through our pharmacy services
segment, we provide electronic prescribing services and other electronic solutions related to
prescription benefit claim filing, adjudication and management.
There are a number of company-specific initiatives and industry trends that may affect our
transaction volumes, revenues, cost of operations and margins. As part of our strategy, we
encourage our customers to migrate from paper-based claim, patient statement, payment and other
transaction processing to electronic, automated processing in order to improve efficiency. Our
business is aligned with our customers to support this transition, and as they migrate from
paper-based transaction processing to electronic processing, even though our revenues for an
applicable customer generally will decline, our margins and profitability will typically increase.
For example, because the cost of postage is included in our revenues for patient statement and
payment services (which is then also deducted as a cost of operations), when our customers
transition to electronic processing, our revenues and costs of operations are expected to decrease
as we will no longer incur or be required to charge for postage. As another example, as our payer
customers migrate to exclusive or other comprehensive management services agreements with us, our
electronic transaction volume usually increases while the rebates we pay and the per transaction
rates we charge under these agreements are typically reduced.
Part of our strategy also includes the development and introduction of new products and
services. Our new and updated products and services are likely to require us to incur development
and engineering expenditures at levels similar to, and possibly greater than, recent years
expenditures in order to successfully develop and achieve market acceptance of such products and
services. We also may acquire, or enter into agreements with third parties to assist us in
providing, new products and services. For example, we offer our electronic payment solutions
through banks or vendors who contract with banks and other financial service firms. The costs of
these initiatives or the failure to achieve broad penetration in target markets with respect to new
or updated products and services may negatively affect our results of operations and margins.
In addition to our internal development efforts, we actively evaluate opportunities to improve
and expand our solutions through strategic acquisitions. Our acquisition strategy focuses on
identifying acquisitions that improve and streamline the healthcare revenue and payment cycle. We
believe our broad customer footprint allows us to deploy acquired products and services into our
installed base, which, in turn, can help to accelerate growth of our acquired businesses. We also
believe our management teams ability to identify acquisition opportunities that are complementary
and synergistic to our business, and to integrate them into our existing operations with minimal
disruption, will continue to play an important role in the expansion of our business and in our
growth. Our success in acquiring and integrating acquired businesses into our existing operations,
the associated costs of such acquisitions, including integration costs, and the operating
characteristics of the acquired businesses also may impact our results of operations and margins.
We also expect to continue to be affected by general economic, regulatory and demographic
factors affecting the healthcare industry. For several years, there has been pricing pressure in
our industry, which has led and is expected to continue to lead to reduced prices for the same
services. We have sought in the past and will continue to seek to mitigate pricing pressure by
(i) providing additional value-added products and services, (ii) increasing the volume of services
we provide and (iii) managing our costs. In addition, significant changes in regulatory
32
schemes,
such as the updated Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Version
5010 standard electronic transaction code set requirements for ICD-10, American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (as amended by the
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) ( PPACA) and other federal healthcare
policy initiatives could impact our customers healthcare activities. Demographic trends affecting
the healthcare industry, such as population growth and aging or continued high unemployment rates
as a result of ongoing adverse economic conditions, also could affect the frequency and nature of
our customers healthcare transactional activity. The impact of such changes could impact our
revenues, cost of operations and infrastructure expenses and thereby affect our results of
operations and the way we operate our business. For example, an increase in the U.S. population, if
such increase is accompanied by an increase in the U.S. population that has health benefits, or the
aging of the U.S. population, which requires an overall increased need for healthcare services, may
result in an increase in our transaction volumes which, in turn, may increase our revenues and
costs of operations. Alternatively, a continuation of the ongoing general economic downturn, which
reduces the number of discretionary health procedures by patients, or a persistent high
unemployment rate, if such unemployment rate is accompanied by a decrease in the U.S. population
that has health benefits, may decrease or offset other growth in our transaction volumes, which, in
turn, may adversely impact our revenues and cost of operations. For example, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, revenues for each of our payer services, provider services and pharmacy
services segments were adversely affected by the impact of lower healthcare utilization trends
driven by continued high unemployment and other adverse economic factors.
In March 2010, the President signed PPACA into law. PPACA will change how healthcare services
are covered, delivered and reimbursed through expanded coverage of uninsured individuals, reduced
Medicare program spending and insurance market reforms. By January 2014, PPACA requires states to
expand Medicaid coverage significantly, requires states to establish health insurance exchanges to
facilitate the purchase of health insurance by individuals and small employers and provides
subsidies to states to create non-Medicaid plans for certain low-income residents. Effective in
2014, PPACA imposes penalties on individuals who do not obtain health insurance and employers that
do not provide health insurance to their employees. PPACA also sets forth several health insurance
market reforms, including increased dependent coverage, prohibitions on excluding individuals based
on pre-existing conditions and mandated minimum medical loss ratios for health plans. In addition,
PPACA provides for significant new taxes, including an industry user tax paid by health insurance
companies beginning in 2014, as well as an excise tax on health insurers and employers offering
high cost health coverage plans. PPACA also imposes significant Medicare Advantage funding cuts and
material reductions to Medicare and Medicaid program spending. PPACA provides for additional
resources to combat healthcare fraud, waste and abuse and also requires the Department of Health &
Human Services to adopt standards for electronic transactions in addition to those required under
HIPAA and to establish operating rules to promote uniformity in the implementation of each
standardized electronic transaction. In addition to federal reform, several states are considering,
or may consider, legislative proposals that could affect our business or our customers.
Because of the many variables involved, including PPACAs complexity, lack of implementing
regulations or interpretive guidance, gradual implementation, and possible amendment or repeal, we
are unable to predict all of the ways in which PPACA could impact us. While many of the provisions
of PPACA will not be directly applicable to us, PPACA will affect the business of our payer,
provider and pharmacy customers and will also affect the Medicaid programs of the states with which
we have contracts. Because it is too early to fully understand the impacts of the legislation on
our business or on the business of our customers, we are currently unable to predict with any
reasonable certainty or otherwise quantify the likely impact of PPACA on our business model,
financial condition or result of operations.
Organizational Structure
The Company is a Delaware corporation. A brief history of our organizational structure is
as follows:
33
|
|
|
Prior to November 2006, the group of companies that comprised
Emdeon Business Services (EBS) was owned by HLTH
Corporation, currently known as WebMD Health Corp.
(WebMD). EBS Master LLC (EBS Master) was formed by WebMD
to act as a holding company for EBS. EBS Master, through its
100% owned subsidiary, Emdeon Business Services LLC (EBS
LLC), owns EBS. |
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, we were formed by General Atlantic LLC
(General Atlantic) as a Delaware limited liability company
for the purpose of making an investment in EBS Master. In
November 2006, we acquired a 52% interest in EBS Master from
WebMD (the 2006 Transaction). WebMD retained a 48% interest
in EBS Master upon closing of the 2006 Transaction. |
|
|
|
|
In February 2008, WebMD sold its remaining 48% interest in
EBS Master (the 2008 Transaction) to affiliates of General
Atlantic and Hellman & Friedman LLC (H&F). As a result,
following the 2008 Transaction, EBS Master was owned 65.77%
by affiliates of General Atlantic (including us) and 34.23%
by affiliates of H&F. General Atlantic and H&F are sometimes
referred to herein as the Principal Equityholders. |
|
|
|
|
In connection with our initial public offering (IPO), we
were converted into a Delaware corporation and changed our
name to Emdeon Inc. in September 2008 and completed a
corporate restructuring on August 5, 2009 (collectively, the
reorganization transactions). |
|
|
|
|
On August 11, 2009, we priced the IPO of our Class A common
stock and began trading on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) under the symbol EM. |
Recent Developments
In January 2010, we acquired Future Vision Investment Group L.L.C. and the assets of two
related companies (collectively, FVTech), a provider of outsourced services specializing in
electronic data conversion and information management solutions. This acquisition allows us to
electronically process virtually all patient and third party healthcare payments regardless of the
format in which the payments are submitted.
In March 2010, we acquired Healthcare Technology Management Services (HTMS), a consulting
company focused primarily on the healthcare payer market. This acquisition allows us to assist
payers in evaluating their existing information technology strategies, systems and technologies in
order to help our customers implement effective solutions.
In April 2010, we exercised an option to acquire certain additional rights to
specified uses of our data from WebMD.
In June 2010, we acquired all of the equity interests of Chapin Revenue Cycle Management, LLC
(Chapin), a technology-enabled provider of hospital-based revenue cycle services. This
acquisition allows us to offer an added service layer designed to enhance the financial performance
of institutional healthcare providers across our network, as well as strengthen our ability to
drive acceleration of the hospital revenue cycle.
In October 2010, we acquired all of the equity interests of Chamberlin Edmonds Holdings Inc.
and Chamberlin Edmonds & Associates, Inc. (collectively, Chamberlin), a provider of government
program eligibility and enrollment services, for approximately
$260.0 million in cash. Under the terms of the merger agreement,
the purchase price consisted of:
(i) payments of approximately $209.5 million to former stockholders of Chamberlin and $44.5 million
in satisfaction of Chamberlins debt and transaction related obligations and (ii) other transaction
related adjustments benefitting the Company of approximately $6.0 million. This acquisition will
allow us to use Chamberlins technology-enabled services to assist hospitals in lowering the
incidence of uncompensated care, reducing bad-debt expense and increasing overall cash flow.
34
Our Revenues and Expenses
We generate virtually all of our revenue by providing products and services that automate and
simplify business and administrative functions for payers and providers, generally on either a per
transaction, per document, per communication or per member per month basis, or, in some cases, on a
monthly flat-fee or contingent fee basis. For certain services, we may charge an implementation fee
in conjunction with related setup and connection to our network and other systems. We also receive
software license fees and software and hardware maintenance fees, primarily from payers who license
our systems for converting paper claims into electronic ones, and occasionally, sell additional
software and hardware products to such payers. Additionally, we receive consulting services fees on
an hourly or project basis through our payer services segment.
Cost of operations consists primarily of costs related to products and services we
provide to customers and costs associated with the operation and maintenance of our networks. These
costs include (i) postage and materials costs related to our patient statement and payment
services, (ii) rebates paid to our channel partners and (iii) data communications costs, all of
which generally vary with our revenues and/or volumes. Cost of operations also includes
(i) personnel costs associated with production, network operations, customer support and other
personnel, (ii) facilities expenses and (iii) equipment maintenance, which vary less directly with
our revenue and/or volumes due to the fixed or semi-fixed nature of these expenses.
The largest component of our cost of operations is currently postage which is primarily
incurred in our patient statements and payment services businesses and which is also a component of
our revenue in those businesses. Our postage costs increase as our patient statement and payment
services volumes increase and also when the U.S. Postal Service increases postage rates. U.S.
postage rate increases, while generally billed as pass-through costs to our customers, affect our
cost of operations as a percentage of revenue. In recent years, we have offset the impact of
postage rate increases through cost reductions from efficiency measures, including data
communication expense reductions and production efficiencies. Though we plan to continue our
efficiency measures, we may not be able to offset the impact of postage rate increases in the
future and, as a result, cost of operations as a percentage of revenue may rise if postage rate
increases continue. Although the U.S. Postal Service increased postal rates annually from 2006 to
2009, such annual increases may not occur as regularly in the future. For example, no postage rate
increase has occurred to date or is expected in 2010.
Rebates are paid to channel partners for electronic and other volumes delivered through
our network to certain payers and can be impacted by the number of exclusive or other comprehensive
management services agreements we execute with payers, the associated rate structure with our payer
customers, the success of our direct sales efforts for provider revenue cycle management products
and services and the extent to which direct connections to payers are developed by channel
partners.
Our data communication expense consists of telecommunication and transaction processing
charges. Over the last several years, we have been able to reduce our data communication expense
due to efficiency measures and contract pricing changes. Due to the significance of these past
reductions in recent years, further reductions may have a lesser impact in future periods.
Our material costs relate primarily to our patient statement and payment services
volumes, and consist primarily of paper and printing costs.
Development and engineering expense consists primarily of personnel costs related to the
development, management and maintenance of our current and future products and services. We plan to
invest more in this area in the future as we develop new products and enhance existing products.
35
Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense (excluding corporate expense
described in the next paragraph) consists primarily of personnel costs associated with our sales,
account management and marketing functions and management and administrative services related to
the operations of our business segments.
Our corporate expense relates to personnel costs associated with management, administrative,
finance, human resources, legal, marketing, public and investor relations and other corporate
service functions as well as professional services, costs incurred in connection with acquisitions,
certain facilities costs, advertising and promotion, insurance and other expenses related to our
overall business operations. Since the IPO, we have incurred costs and we expect to incur
additional costs related to operating as a public company, including additional directors and
officers liability insurance, outside director compensation, additional personnel costs and
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley) and other compliance costs.
Our development and engineering expense, sales, marketing, general and administrative expense
and our corporate expense, while related to our current operations, are also affected and
influenced by our future plans including the development of new products and services, business
strategies and enhancement and maintenance of our infrastructure.
Significant Items Affecting Comparability
Certain significant items or events should be considered to better understand differences in
our results of operations from period to period. We believe that the following items or events have
had a significant impact on our results of operations for the periods discussed below or may have a
significant impact on our results of operations in future periods:
Acquisitions and Divestitures
We actively evaluate opportunities to improve and expand our business through targeted
acquisitions that are consistent with our strategy. On occasion, we also may dispose of certain
components of our business that no longer fit within our overall strategy. Because of our
acquisition and divestiture activity, our results of operations may not be directly comparable
among periods. The following summarizes our acquisitions and divestitures since January 1, 2009 and
the affected segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
Business |
|
Description |
|
Affected Segment |
Acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2009 |
|
The Sentinel Group |
|
Fraud and abuse management solutions |
|
Payer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2009 |
|
eRx Network, L.L.C. |
|
Electronic pharmacy healthcare solutions |
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
(eRx) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2009 and
April 2010 |
|
Data Rights |
|
Acquired certain additional rights to specified uses of data from WebMD |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2010 |
|
FVTech |
|
Electronic data conversion and management solutions |
|
Provider; Payer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2010 |
|
HTMS |
|
Consulting solutions |
|
Payer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
Business |
|
Description |
|
Affected Segment |
June 2010 |
|
Chapin |
|
Hospital-based revenue cycle services |
|
Provider |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2010 |
|
Chamberlin |
|
Government program eligibility and enrollment services |
|
Provider |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestiture: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2009 |
|
Control-o-Fax |
|
Office supplies and print services |
|
Provider |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For certain of our acquisitions, we agreed to transfer additional consideration to the sellers
of the acquired businesses in the event that specified performance measures are achieved. U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles generally require us to recognize the initial fair value
of the expected amount to be paid under such contingent consideration arrangements as a component
of the total consideration transferred. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the amounts
expected to be paid, however, are generally required to be recognized as a component of net income.
Such changes in fair value may occur based on changes in the expected timing or amount of payments
or the effect of discounting the liability for the time value of money. During the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2010, we recognized an increase in pretax income of $2.4 million
and $4.1 million, respectively related to changes in fair value of contingent consideration.
Income Taxes
Our statutory federal and state income tax rate generally ranges from 38% to 40%. Several
factors, however, can affect the Companys effective tax rate for particular periods. Among these
factors are the following items:
|
|
|
Valuation allowance changes We record valuation allowances or reverse existing
valuation allowances related to assumed future income tax benefits depending on
circumstances and factors related to our business. Changes in these valuation allowances
resulted in approximately $1.1 million and $6.9 million of additional income tax expense
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and approximately
$1.9 million of income tax expense and $8.1 million of income tax benefit
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in our book and tax basis in EBS Master Certain items, including certain
equity-based compensation, other comprehensive income and income of corporate
consolidated subsidiaries of EBS Master, affect our book basis in EBS Master without
similarly affecting our tax basis in EBS Master. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in apportioned state income tax rate Changes in our operations also may
cause our apportioned state income tax rate to change from period to period. Such rate
changes may require adjustment to our existing deferred income tax assets and liabilities
that have been recorded primarily as a result of our investment in EBS Master, as well as
the 2006 Transaction and 2008 Transaction. |
Stock-Based and Equity-Based Compensation Expense
Prior to the IPO, certain of our employees and directors participated in one of two
equity-based compensation plansthe Amended and Restated EBS Executive Equity Incentive Plan (the
EBS Equity Plan) and the Amended and Restated EBS Incentive Plan (the EBS Phantom Plan). In
connection with the IPO, outstanding awards under the EBS Phantom Plan were converted into awards
under the Emdeon Inc. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan adopted by the Companys stockholders in July 2009
(the 2009 Plan) and outstanding awards under the EBS Equity Plan were converted into units of
membership interest in EBS Master (EBS Units) that are governed by individual agreements with
certain directors and members of executive management, as well as awards under the 2009 Plan. The
EBS Equity Plan
37
consisted of a class of non-voting EBS Master equity units called Grant Units.
The Grant Units represented profits interests in EBS Master and appreciated with increases in value
of EBS Master. The EBS Phantom Plan was designed to allow individual employees to participate
economically in the future growth and value creation at EBS LLC. Each participant received a
specified number of units in the EBS Phantom
Plan called Phantom Units. These Phantom Units appreciated with increases in value of EBS
Master. These Phantom Units did not give employees an ownership interest in the Company and had no
voting rights.
We incurred stock-based and equity-based compensation expense of $4.8 million and $12.7
million for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to
$12.6 million and $21.5 million during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. Comparability among the respective periods has been impacted by the following
factors:
|
|
|
Change in the estimated fair value of liability awards. All
equity-based awards granted under the EBS Equity Plan and EBS Phantom
Plan prior to the second quarter of 2009 were classified as
liabilities due to certain repurchase features. As liabilities, we
were required to adjust the equity-based awards to fair value at the
end of each quarter. The fair value of these liabilities generally
fluctuated with the value of the underlying EBS Units. |
|
|
|
|
Modification of equity-based awards. In June 2009, we modified the
repurchase features of all Grant Units previously granted under the
EBS Equity Plan. Following this modification, all Grant Units were
reclassified as equity awards. Immediately prior to this
reclassification, we adjusted the value of these Grant Units to their
fair value. In addition to a change in estimate recognized at the
modification date, we also began recognizing compensation expense
prospectively based on the increased fair value of these Grant Units
at the modification date as compared to the fair value of such awards
at September 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Conversion in connection with the IPO. In connection with the IPO and
reorganization transactions, the Phantom Units were converted into
shares of our Class A common stock, restricted Class A common stock
units and options to purchase shares of our Class A common stock under
the 2009 Plan. As a result of the IPO and this conversion, in addition
to a change in estimate recognized at the IPO date, we also began
recognizing compensation expense prospectively based on the fair value
of these Phantom Units at the IPO date. |
|
|
|
|
Additional 2009 Plan Grants. On and since the IPO date, we have
granted restricted Class A common stock units and options to purchase
shares of our Class A common stock to certain of our employees and
directors. |
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue, expense and related disclosures. We base our estimates and assumptions on the
best information available to us at the time the estimates and assumptions are made, on historical
experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.
We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe there have been no significant changes during the nine months ended September 30,
2010 to the items we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Form 10-K.
38
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue(1) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue(1) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue(1) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue(1) |
|
Revenues (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer Services |
|
$ |
108,565 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
% |
|
$ |
99,714 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
% |
|
$ |
319,094 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
$ |
294,307 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
% |
Provider Services |
|
|
117,992 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
117,275 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
|
|
|
350,118 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
|
|
|
347,207 |
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
Pharmacy Services |
|
|
20,207 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
59,830 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
40,196 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(2,552 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
245,923 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
235,462 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
726,490 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
679,888 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer Services |
|
|
71,206 |
|
|
|
65.6 |
|
|
|
65,805 |
|
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
|
208,231 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
188,094 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
Provider Services |
|
|
72,710 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
75,070 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
215,785 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
221,464 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
Pharmacy Services |
|
|
7,811 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
6,158 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
21,790 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
9,947 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs of operations |
|
|
150,918 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
146,471 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
443,349 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
418,079 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer Services |
|
|
2,873 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3,847 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
8,938 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
9,172 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Provider Services |
|
|
3,943 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
4,297 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
11,607 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
11,283 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Pharmacy Services |
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total development and engineering |
|
|
8,596 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
10,045 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
25,845 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
24,425 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, marketing, general and admin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer Services |
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
8,037 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
19,422 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
20,461 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Provider Services |
|
|
7,526 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
21,049 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
24,335 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Pharmacy Services |
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
4,520 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
5,439 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales, marketing, general and admin
excluding corporate |
|
|
15,386 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
20,337 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
44,896 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
49,837 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from segment operations |
|
|
71,023 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
58,609 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
212,400 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
187,547 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
Corporate expense |
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
13,968 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
35,960 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
36,051 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
30,001 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
26,667 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
87,054 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
77,051 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
27,914 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
17,974 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
89,386 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
74,445 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
16,163 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
17,219 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
47,747 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
52,330 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Other (gain) loss |
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,140 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
14,125 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
45,791 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
22,196 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
7,498 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
9,245 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
27,650 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
12,885 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
6,627 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
(8,463 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
|
|
18,141 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
9,311 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Emdeon Inc. |
|
$ |
3,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(7,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All references to percentage of revenues for expense components refer to the percentage of revenues for such segment. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 16-Segment Reporting to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further detail of our revenues within each reportable segment. |
39
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Revenues
Our total revenues were $245.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to $235.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
approximately $10.5 million, or 4.4%.
On an overall basis, revenues for our payer services, provider services and pharmacy services
segments were adversely affected during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to
the prior year period by the impact of lower healthcare utilization driven by continued high
unemployment and other adverse economic factors. Additional factors affecting our various product
line revenues are described in the following paragraphs.
Our payer services segment revenue is summarized by product line in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
49,438 |
|
|
$ |
46,072 |
|
|
$ |
3,366 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
58,369 |
|
|
|
53,345 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
108,565 |
|
|
$ |
99,714 |
|
|
$ |
8,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased by
approximately $3.4 million, or 7.3%, primarily due to the inclusion of the FVTech and HTMS acquired
businesses in the current year period. This increase in revenue was partially offset by the impact
of market pricing pressures on our average transaction rates. Payment services revenues for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 increased by approximately $5.0 million, or 9.4%, as compared
to the prior year period. This increase was primarily driven by new sales and implementations.
Additionally, all payer services segment revenues were adversely affected by the impact of lower
healthcare utilization during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Our provider services segment revenue is summarized by product line in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
Patient statements |
|
$ |
65,920 |
|
|
$ |
69,840 |
|
|
$ |
(3,920 |
) |
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
44,064 |
|
|
|
39,041 |
|
|
|
5,023 |
|
Dental |
|
|
7,925 |
|
|
|
7,978 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
117,992 |
|
|
$ |
117,275 |
|
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patient statements revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased by
approximately $3.9 million, or 5.6%, primarily due to the sale of our office supplies and print
services business in October 2009 and customer attrition. This decrease was partially offset by
new sales and implementations. Revenue cycle management revenues for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 increased by approximately $5.0 million, or 12.9%, primarily due to new sales
and implementations and the inclusion of the Chapin business which
40
was acquired in June 2010.
Dental revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were generally consistent with those
reflected in the comparable prior year period.
Additionally, all provider services segment revenues were adversely affected by the impact of lower
healthcare utilization during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Our pharmacy services segment revenues were $20.2 million for the three months ended September
30, 2010 as compared to $19.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
approximately $1.0 million, or 5.3%. This increase was primarily due to new sales and
implementations, partially offset by the impact of lower healthcare utilization during the three
months ended September 30, 2010.
Cost of Operations
Our total cost of operations was $150.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010
as compared to $146.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
approximately $4.4 million, or 3.0%.
Our cost of operations for our payer services segment was approximately $71.2 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $65.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $5.4 million, or 8.2%. As a percentage of revenue,
our payer services cost of operations decreased to 65.6% for the three months ended September 30,
2010 as compared to 66.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Cost of operations for our
payer services segment includes approximately $0.7 million and $2.6 million of equity-based
compensation for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Excluding this
equity-based compensation, payers services costs of operations were $70.5 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $63.3 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009, an increase of approximately $7.3 million or 11.5%. The increase in our payer services
cost of operations is primarily due to revenue growth in payment services and the inclusion of
businesses acquired in 2010. Excluding equity-based compensation, as a percentage of revenue, our
payer services costs of operations increased to 64.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2010
as compared to 63.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. This increase as a percentage
of revenue was primarily due to changes in revenue mix between our payment services solutions and
recently acquired claims management businesses, which generally have higher cost of operations, and
our historical claims management services, which generally have lower cost of operations.
Our cost of operations for our provider services segment was $72.7 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $75.1 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $2.4 million, or 3.1%. As a percentage of revenue, our
provider services segment cost of operations decreased to 61.6% for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to 64.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Cost of
operations for our provider services segment includes approximately $0.3 million and $1.7 million
of equity-based compensation for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Excluding this equity-based compensation, provider services cost of operations were $72.4 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $73.3 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $1.0 million or 1.3%. The decrease in our
provider services cost of operations and as a percentage of revenue is primarily due to changes in
revenue mix between our patient statements services, which generally have higher cost of
operations, and revenue cycle management services, which generally have lower cost of operations.
This decrease was partially offset by the inclusion of revenue and associated costs of the Chapin
business which was acquired in June 2010.
Our cost of operations for our pharmacy services segment was $7.8 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $6.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
an increase of approximately $1.7 million, or 26.8%. This increase is primarily attributable to the
integration of the acquired eRx business with the Companys pharmacy operations.
Development and Engineering Expense
Our total development and engineering expense was $8.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as
41
compared to $10.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a
decrease of approximately $1.4 million, or 14.4%. Development and engineering expense includes
approximately $0.3 million and $0.9 million of equity-based compensation for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Excluding this equity-based compensation, development
and engineering expense was $8.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to $9.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately
$0.8 million or 9.1%. The decrease is primarily attributable to the absence in the three months
ended September 30, 2010, of severance, compensation and facility consolidation costs related to
2009 efficiency measures.
Sales, Marketing, General and Administrative Expense (Excluding Corporate Expense)
Our total sales, marketing, general and administrative expense (excluding corporate expense)
was $15.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $20.3 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $5.0 million, or 24.3%.
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our payer services segment was
approximately $6.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $8.0
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $1.6 million, or
20.0%. Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our payer services segment includes
approximately $0.7 million and $2.3 million of equity-based compensation for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Excluding this equity-based compensation, payer services
sales, marketing, general and administrative expense was $5.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to $5.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a
decrease of approximately $0.1 or 1.7%, which reflects a generally consistent level of activity.
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our provider services segment was
approximately $7.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $9.0
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $1.5 million, or
16.7%. Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our provider services segment
includes approximately $0.5 million and $1.4 million of equity-based compensation for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Excluding this equity-based compensation,
provider services sales, marketing, general and administrative expense was $7.0 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $7.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $0.6 million or 7.9%. The decrease in our provider
services sales, marketing, general and administrative expense is primarily due to reduced bad debt
expense in our revenue cycle management business and reduced compensation costs from efficiency
measures. This decrease was partially offset by the inclusion of the infrastructure associated
with the Chapin business which was acquired in June 2010.
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our pharmacy services segment was
approximately $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $3.4
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $2.0 million, or
57.3%. This decrease is primarily attributable to the integration of the acquired eRx business
with the Companys pharmacy operations.
Corporate Expense
Our corporate expense was $13.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to $14.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of
approximately $0.9 million, or 6.2%. Corporate expense includes approximately $2.1 million and $3.3
million of equity-based compensation for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Excluding this equity-based compensation, corporate expense was $11.0 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $10.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $0.3 million, or 2.7%.
42
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Our depreciation and amortization expense was $30.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to $26.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an
increase of approximately $3.3 million, or 12.5%. This increase was primarily due to depreciation
of property and equipment placed in service subsequent to September 30, 2009, as well as additional
depreciation and amortization expense related to acquisition method adjustments associated with
technology and intangible assets acquired in connection with recently acquired businesses and the
acquisition from WebMD of certain additional rights to specified uses of our data.
Interest Expense
Our interest expense was $16.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to $17.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of
approximately $1.1 million, or 6.1%. This decrease is primarily due to a scheduled decrease in the
notional amount of our interest rate swap agreement of approximately $123.6 million that occurred
on December 31, 2009 which caused less of our debt to be subject to the higher fixed rate of our
interest rate swap agreement during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense was $7.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to $9.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately
$1.7 million, or 18.9%. Differences between the federal statutory rate and the effective income
tax rates for these periods principally relate to the change in our book basis versus tax basis of
our investment in EBS Master, including the effect of income allocated to a noncontrolling
interest, valuation allowance changes, state income tax rate changes and the impact of other
permanent differences relative to pre-tax income. During the three months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, the Company recognized an increase in income tax expense of approximately $1.1 million
and $1.9 million, respectively, related to changes in valuation allowances.
43
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Revenues
Our total revenues were $726.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to $679.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
approximately $46.6 million, or 6.9%.
On an overall basis, revenues for our payer services, provider services and pharmacy services
segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were adversely affected as compared to the
prior year period by the impact of lower healthcare utilization driven by continued high
unemployment and other adverse economic factors. Additional factors affecting our various product
line revenues are described in the following paragraphs.
Our payer services segment revenue is summarized by product line in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
145,090 |
|
|
$ |
137,440 |
|
|
$ |
7,650 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
171,693 |
|
|
|
156,433 |
|
|
|
15,260 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
319,094 |
|
|
$ |
294,307 |
|
|
$ |
24,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by
approximately $7.7 million, or 5.6%, primarily due to the inclusion of the FVTech and HTMS acquired
businesses, as well as increased payment integrity revenue, in the current year period. This
increase in revenue was partially offset by the impact of market pricing pressures on our average
transaction rates and by volume impacts from weather conditions and a milder than expected flu
season in the first quarter of 2010. Payment services revenues for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 increased by approximately $15.3 million, or 9.8%, as compared to the prior year period.
This increase was primarily driven by new sales and implementations, as well as the impact of the
U.S. postage rate increase effective in May 2009. Additionally, all payer services segment revenues
were adversely affected by the impact of lower healthcare utilization during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
Our provider services segment revenue is summarized by product line in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
Patient statements |
|
$ |
198,214 |
|
|
$ |
207,304 |
|
|
$ |
(9,090 |
) |
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
127,855 |
|
|
|
114,825 |
|
|
|
13,030 |
|
Dental |
|
|
23,808 |
|
|
|
23,690 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
(1,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
350,118 |
|
|
$ |
347,207 |
|
|
$ |
2,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patient statements revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased by
approximately $9.1 million, or 4.4%, primarily due to the sale of our office supplies and print
services business in October 2009 and customer attrition. This decrease was partially offset
44
by
new sales and implementations and the impact of the U.S. postage rate increase in May 2009. Revenue
cycle management revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by approximately
$13.0
million, or 11.3%, primarily due to new sales and implementations and the inclusion of Chapin
business which was acquired in June 2010, partially offset by the impact of weather conditions and
the mild flu season in the first quarter of 2010. Dental revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 were generally consistent with those reflected in the comparable prior year
period. Additionally, all provider services segment revenues were adversely affected by the impact
of lower healthcare utilization during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Our pharmacy services segment revenues were $59.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $40.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
an increase of approximately $19.6 million, or 48.8%. This increase was primarily due to our
acquisition of eRx in July 2009 and new sales and implementations, partially offset by the impact
of lower healthcare utilization during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Cost of Operations
Our total cost of operations was $443.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
as compared to $418.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
approximately $25.3 million, or 6.0%.
Our cost of operations for our payer services segment was approximately $208.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $188.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $20.1 million, or 10.7%. As a percentage of
revenue, our payer services cost of operations increased to 65.3% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to 63.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Cost of
operations for our payer services segment includes approximately $1.8 million and $3.8 million of
equity-based compensation for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Excluding this equity-based compensation, payer services costs of operations were $206.5 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $184.3 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $22.2 million or 12.0%. The increase in our
payer services cost of operations is primarily due to revenue growth in payment services, including
increased postage costs resulting from the U.S. postage rate increase effective in May 2009, and
the inclusion of businesses acquired in 2010. Excluding equity-based compensation, as a percentage
of revenue, our payer services costs of operations increased to 64.7% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to 62.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase
as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to changes in revenue mix between our payment services
solutions and recently acquired claims management businesses, which generally have higher cost of
operations, and our historical claims management services, which generally have lower cost of
operations.
Our cost of operations for our provider services segment was $215.8 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $221.5 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $5.7 million, or 2.6%. As a percentage of revenue, our
provider services segment cost of operations decreased to 61.6% for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 as compared to 63.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Cost of operations for
our provider services segment includes approximately $0.9 million and $2.0 million of equity-based
compensation for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Excluding this
equity-based compensation, provider services cost of operations were $214.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $219.5 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $4.6 million or 2.1%. The decrease in our provider services
cost of operations and as a percentage of revenue is primarily due to changes in revenue mix
between our patient statements services, which generally have higher cost of operations, and
revenue cycle management services, which generally have lower cost of operations. This decrease
was partially offset by the inclusion of revenue and associated costs of the Chapin business which
was acquired in June 2010.
45
Our cost of operations for our pharmacy services segment was $21.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
an increase of approximately $11.8 million, or 119.1%. This increase is primarily related to the
integration of the acquired eRx business with the Companys pharmacy operations.
Development and Engineering Expense
Our total development and engineering expense was $25.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to $24.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an
increase of approximately $1.4 million, or 5.8%. Development and engineering expense includes
approximately $1.0 million and $1.0 million of equity-based compensation for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase is primarily related to increased product
development activity in our payer services and provider services segments and the inclusion of the
product development infrastructures associated with our recently acquired businesses.
Sales, Marketing, General and Administrative Expense (Excluding Corporate Expense)
Our total sales, marketing, general and administrative expense (excluding corporate expense)
was $44.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $49.8 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $4.9 million, or 9.9%.
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our payer services segment was
approximately $19.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $20.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $1.0 million, or
5.1%. Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our payer services segment includes
approximately $1.8 million and $4.0 million of equity-based compensation for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Excluding this equity-based compensation, payer services
sales, marketing, general and administrative expense was $17.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to $16.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an
increase of approximately $1.2 million or 7.1%, The increase in our payer services sales,
marketing, general and administrative expense is primarily due to the inclusion of the
infrastructures associated with recently acquired businesses.
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our provider services segment was
approximately $21.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $24.3
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $3.3 million, or
13.5%. Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our provider services segment
includes approximately $1.3 million and $2.5 million of equity-based compensation for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Excluding this equity-based compensation,
provider services sales, marketing, general and administrative expense was $19.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $21.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $2.1 million or 9.5%. The decrease in our provider
services sales, marketing, general and administrative expense is primarily due to reduced bad debt
expense in our revenue cycle management business and reduced compensation costs from efficiency
measures. This decrease was partially offset by the inclusion of the infrastructure associated
with the Chapin business which was acquired in June 2010.
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our pharmacy services segment was
approximately $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $5.4 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $0.9 million, or 16.9%.
This decrease is primarily attributable to the integration of the acquired eRx business with the
Companys pharmacy operations.
Corporate Expense
Our corporate expense was $36.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to $36.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately
$0.1 million, or 0.3%. Corporate expense includes approximately $5.6 million and $7.7 million of
equity-based compensation for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Excluding this equity-based compensation, corporate expense was $30.3 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $28.3 million
46
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
an increase of approximately $2.0 million, or 7.2%. This increase was primarily attributable to
incremental costs in the current year period associated with the infrastructure required to operate
as a public company and legal and other professional fees related to 2010 acquisition activity.
These increases were partially offset by changes in estimate of our tax receivable obligations
which reduced corporate expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 by approximately $0.3
million and the impact of a reduction in scheduled rent payments under our former corporate
headquarters office lease.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Our depreciation and amortization expense was $87.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to $77.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an
increase of approximately $10.0 million, or 13.0%. This increase was primarily due to depreciation
of property and equipment placed in service subsequent to September 30, 2009, as well as additional
depreciation and amortization expense related to acquisition method adjustments associated with
technology and intangible assets acquired in connection with recently acquired businesses and the
acquisition from WebMD of certain additional rights to specified uses of our data.
Interest Expense
Our interest expense was $47.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to $52.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately
$4.6 million, or 8.8%. This decrease was primarily due to a scheduled decrease in the notional
amount of our interest rate swap agreement of approximately $123.6 million that occurred on
December 31, 2009 which caused less of our debt to be subject to the higher fixed rate of our
interest rate swap agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense was $27.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to $12.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
approximately $14.8 million. Differences between the federal statutory rate and the effective
income tax rates for these periods principally relate to the change in our book basis versus tax
basis of our investment in EBS Master, including the effect of income allocated to a noncontrolling
interest, valuation allowance changes, state income tax rate changes and the impact of other
permanent differences relative to pre-tax income. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
the Company recognized an increase in income tax expense of approximately $6.9 million related to
changes in valuation allowances. During the prior year period, the Company recognized a decrease in
income tax expense of approximately $8.1 million related to changes in valuation allowances.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
We are a holding company with no material business operations. Our principal asset is the
equity interests we own in EBS Master. We conduct all of our business operations through the direct
and indirect subsidiaries of EBS Master. Accordingly, our only material sources of cash are the IPO
proceeds, borrowings under our credit agreement and dividends or other distributions or payments
that are derived from earnings and cash flow generated by the subsidiaries of EBS Master.
We have financed our operations primarily through cash provided by operating activities,
private sales of EBS Units to the Principal Equityholders, borrowings under our credit agreements
and the IPO. We believe that our existing cash on hand, cash generated from operating activities
and available borrowings under our revolving credit agreement ($45.7 million as of September 30,
2010) will be sufficient to service our existing debt, finance internal growth, fund capital
expenditures and fund small to mid-size acquisitions. As of September 30, 2010, we had cash and
cash equivalents of $217.0 million as compared to $212.0 million as of December 31, 2009.
47
On October 1, 2010, we borrowed an additional $100.0 million under an incremental term loan
facility through an amendment to our first lien credit agreement and used the net proceeds, along
with $160.0 million cash on hand, to acquire Chamberlin for approximately $260.0 million in cash.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, the purchase price consisted of: (i) payments of approximately $209.5 million to former stockholders of
Chamberlin and $44.5 million in satisfaction of Chamberlins debt and transaction related
obligations and (ii) other transaction related adjustments benefitting the Company of approximately
$6.0 million.
Our cash balances in the future may be reduced if we expend our cash on capital expenditures,
future acquisitions or elect to make optional prepayments under our credit agreements. In addition,
if as a result of the current conditions in the credit
markets, any of the lenders participating in our revolving credit agreement become insolvent, it
may make it more difficult for us to borrow under our revolving credit agreement, which could
adversely affect our liquidity. Credit market instability also may make it more difficult for us to
obtain additional financing or refinance our existing credit facilities in the future on acceptable
terms or at all. If we were unable to obtain such additional financing when needed or were unable
to refinance our credit facilities, our financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Cash Flows
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $120.8 million as
compared to $121.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Cash provided by
operating activities can be significantly impacted by our non-cash working capital assets and
liabilities, which may vary based on the timing of cash receipts that fluctuate by day of week
and/or month and be impacted by cash management decisions. For example, the timing of our cash
disbursements during the fourth quarter of 2008 affected the amounts of our prepaid expenses,
accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2008 and the cash provided by operating
activities during 2009.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $109.3
million as compared to $106.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Cash used in
investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 primarily reflects cash
paid for acquisitions. In addition, we also increased our capital expenditures during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to our investment in a new data center in Nashville,
Tennessee and equipment upgrades in our patient statements business.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $6.5
million as compared to cash provided by financing activities of $108.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we paid only scheduled
principal payments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we (i) received net proceeds
of approximately $148.3 million from our IPO and (ii) in addition to scheduled principal payments,
also paid amounts previously borrowed under our revolving credit facility and made an optional
principal payment under our first lien credit agreement.
Credit Facilities
In November 2006, our subsidiary, EBS LLC, entered into the first lien credit agreement, which
we refer to as the First Lien Credit Agreement, and the second lien credit agreement, which we
refer to as the Second Lien Credit Agreement, each as amended from time to time. Together, we
refer to the First Lien Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Agreement as the Credit
Agreements. The First Lien Credit Agreement provided us $805.0 million of total available
financing, consisting of a secured $755.0 million term loan facility and a secured $50.0 million
revolving credit facility. In October 2010, we, through our subsidiaries, borrowed an additional
48
$100.0 million pursuant to an incremental term loan facility under an amendment to the First Lien
Credit Agreement.
The revolving credit facility provides for the issuance of standby letters of credit, in an
aggregate face amount at any time not in excess of $12.0 million. The issuance of standby letters
of credit reduces the available capacity under our revolving credit facility. In addition, under
the terms of the First Lien Credit Agreement, we can borrow up to an additional $100.0 million in
additional incremental term loans and increase the available capacity under the revolving credit
facility by $25.0 million, provided that the aggregate amount of such increases may not exceed
$100.0 million. There were no borrowings on our revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2010.
Borrowings outstanding under the First Lien Credit Agreement amounted to $680.7 million as of
September 30, 2010, and currently bear interest, at our option, at either an adjusted LIBOR rate
plus 2.00% or the lenders alternate base rate plus 1.00%, or a combination of the two. In
addition, under the October 2010 $100.0 million incremental term loan facility, we are required to
pay interest, at our option, at either an adjusted LIBOR rate plus 3.00% (subject to a LIBOR floor
of 1.50%) or the lenders alternate base rate plus 2.00% (subject to an alternate base rate floor
of 2.50%). Other than the interest rate, the incremental term loans are on substantially the same
terms as the Companys existing term loans incurred under the First Lien Credit Agreement. Not
including optional prepayments, we are generally required to make quarterly principal payments
through 2013 of approximately $1.8 million and $0.3 million on the original and additional $100.0
million incremental term loan facilities, respectively, under the First Lien Credit Agreement.
We are required to pay a commitment fee of 0.5% per annum, provided that our total leverage
ratio is greater than or equal to 4.0:1, and otherwise 0.375% per annum on the undrawn portion of
the revolving credit facility. We are permitted to prepay the revolving credit facility or the term
loans (including the $100.0 million incremental term loans) under the First Lien Credit Agreement
at any time. We are required to prepay amounts outstanding under the First Lien Credit Agreement
with proceeds we receive from asset sales that generate proceeds in excess of $1.0 million if not
reinvested (as defined in the Credit Agreements), from indebtedness we incur that is not
specifically permitted to be incurred under the First Lien Credit Agreement, with any excess cash
flow (as defined in the First Lien Credit Agreement) we generate in any fiscal year and from
casualty events.
Our Second Lien Credit Agreement is a term loan facility with an aggregate principal amount of
$170.0 million, which was the amount outstanding as of September 30, 2010. Borrowings outstanding
under the Second Lien Credit Agreement currently bear interest, at our option, at either an
adjusted LIBOR rate plus 5.00% or the lenders alternate base rate plus 4.00%, or a combination of
the two. We are required to make quarterly interest payments. Although we are permitted to prepay
the loans under our Second Lien Credit Agreement at any time, the terms of our First Lien Credit
Agreement restrict our ability to make such prepayments to the amount of previous years retained
excess cash flow (as defined under the Credit Agreements) and only if our total leverage ratio is
4.0:1 or better.
The revolving portion of the First Lien Credit Agreement matures in November 2012 and the term
loans (including the additional $100.0 million incremental term loans) mature in November 2013. The
Second Lien Credit Agreement matures in May 2014. We anticipate refinancing our Credit Agreements
prior to or as of their maturity dates. Given the state of the current credit environment resulting
from, among other things, ongoing adverse economic conditions, we cannot be certain that we will be
successful in our refinancing efforts on acceptable terms or at all, which could have an adverse
effect on our liquidity and results of operations.
The obligations of EBS LLC under the Credit Agreements are unconditionally guaranteed by EBS
Master and all of its subsidiaries and are secured by liens on substantially all of EBS Masters
assets, including the stock of its subsidiaries.
49
As of September 30, 2010, total borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreements amounted to
$850.7 million (excluding the additional $100.0 million incremental term loan facility borrowed in
October 2010 and before unamortized debt discount of $43.9 million primarily related to the
adjustment of our long-term debt to fair value in connection with the 2008 Transaction). Under the
revolving portion of our First Lien Credit Agreement, net of $4.3 million of outstanding but
undrawn letters of credit issued, we had $45.7 million in available borrowing capacity at September
30, 2010.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the weighted average cash interest rate of
our borrowings under our Credit Agreements (including the net cash payments under our interest rate
swap) was approximately 4.9%. Approximately $354.2 million of our weighted average debt
outstanding during the period was subject to a fixed interest rate of 4.94% under our interest rate
swap agreement.
Covenants
The Credit Agreements require us to satisfy specified financial covenants, including a minimum
interest coverage ratio and a maximum total leverage ratio, as set forth in the Credit Agreements.
The minimum interest coverage ratio permitted was 2.5:1.0 at September 30, 2010 and increases at
varying intervals over time until October 1, 2011, at which time it is fixed at 3.5:1.0. At
September 30, 2010, we estimate our interest coverage ratio as defined under the Credit Agreements
to be approximately 6.0 to 1.0. The maximum total leverage ratio permitted was 4.0:1.0 at September
30, 2010 and declines at varying intervals over time until October 1, 2011, at which time it is
fixed at 3.0:1.0. At September 30, 2010, we estimate our total leverage ratio to be approximately
3.2 to 1.0 which, under the terms of the Credit Agreements, reflected only $35.0 million of the
cash on our balance sheet at September 30, 2010 as a reduction of our net debt.
The Credit Agreements also limit us with respect to amounts we may spend on capital
expenditures. As defined in the Credit Agreements, capital expenditures exclude certain items such
as the expenditures made with the retained portion of excess cash flow, replacement of property and
equipment, additions funded with equity offering proceeds and additions funded with proceeds of
asset sales. The limitation varies based on certain base expenditure levels included in the Credit
Agreements and the amount of unused capital expenditures from the previous calendar year, if any,
as well as allowable amounts transferred from future year expenditure limits. For the year ending
December 31, 2010, our capital expenditures (as defined under the Credit Agreements) are limited to
approximately $60.5 million including allowable transfers from 2011. For the years ending December
31, 2011 and 2012, our capital expenditures are limited to $41.0 million and $42.0 million,
respectively, excluding any carryovers from previous years and allowable transfers from future
years. During 2010, in addition to our normal level of capital expenditures, we currently expect to
incur approximately $25.0 million to replace our primary data center in Nashville, Tennessee and
approximately $15.0 million to upgrade equipment in our patient statements business. A portion of
these additional capital expenditures may extend into 2011 depending on timing of the projects.
The Credit Agreements contain negative covenants that may restrict the operation of our
business, including our ability to incur additional debt, create liens, make investments, engage in
asset sales, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into sale-leaseback transactions and
enter into hedging arrangements. In addition, our Credit Agreements restrict the ability of EBS
Master and its subsidiaries to make dividends or other distributions to us, issue equity interests,
repurchase equity interests or certain indebtedness or enter into mergers or consolidations.
As of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all of the financial and other covenants
under the Credit Agreements.
The Credit Agreements do not contain provisions that would accelerate the maturity date of the
loans under the Credit Agreement upon a downgrade in our credit ratings. However, a downgrade in
our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to obtain other capital sources in the future
and could increase our cost of borrowings.
50
Events of default under the Credit Agreements include non-payment of principal, interest, fees
or other amounts when due; violation of certain covenants; failure of any representation or
warranty to be true in all material respects when made or deemed made; cross-default and
cross-acceleration to indebtedness with an aggregate principal amount in excess of $20.0 million;
certain ERISA events; dissolution, insolvency and bankruptcy events; and actual or asserted
invalidity of the guarantees or security documents. In addition, a Change of Control (as such
term is defined in the Credit Agreements) is an event of default under the Credit Agreements. Some
of these events of default allow for grace periods and materiality qualifiers.
Commitments and Contingencies
The Form 10-K discloses certain commitments and contractual obligations that existed as of
December 31, 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we acquired FVTech, HTMS and
Chapin. The consideration transferred in connection with these acquisitions included contingent
obligations to make additional payments based on the achievement of certain financial performance
targets. At September 30, 2010, based on current facts and circumstances, we have estimated
the aggregate fair value of these contingent obligations at $18.8 million which we anticipate will
be paid at various intervals, if earned, over the next three years.
Additionally, in October 2010, we, through our subsidiaries, borrowed an additional $100.0
million pursuant to an incremental term loan facility under an amendment to the First Lien Credit
Agreement to partially fund the acquisition of Chamberlin. We are required to make quarterly
payments of principal and interest on the incremental term loan facility of approximately $0.3
million through 2013 at which time the remaining balance becomes due.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements or obligations, other than
those related to our letters of credit, our interest rate swap agreement, operating leases,
contingent consideration related to certain of our acquisitions and surety bonds of an
insignificant amount.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2009-13, an update to FASB ASC Revenue Recognition Topic, which amends existing
accounting standards for revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements. To the extent a
deliverable within a multiple-element arrangement is not accounted for pursuant to other accounting
standards, the update establishes a selling price hierarchy that allows for the use of an estimated
selling price to determine the allocation of arrangement consideration to a deliverable in a
multiple element arrangement where neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party
evidence is available for that deliverable. The update is to be applied prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified after January 1, 2011 in the case of the Company.
The Company does not expect that the pending adoption of the update will have a material effect on
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the clarification and additional disclosure provisions
of FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, an update to FASB ASC Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures Topic. This update clarifies that companies must provide fair value measurement
disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and expands the requirements to include
disclosure of amounts and reasons for transfers among different levels within the fair value
hierarchy and information within a reconciliation about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements
on a gross basis. The adoption of the clarification and additional disclosure provisions of this
update had no material impact on the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The disclosures required by this update
are presented within Note 8 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The
remaining provisions become effective in the fiscal period beginning after December 31, 2010
(January 1, 2011 in the case of the Company).
51
The Company does not expect that the pending adoption
of the remaining provisions of the update will have a material effect on the Companys disclosures
in its consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We have interest rate risk primarily related to borrowings under the Credit Agreements.
The original term loan borrowings under the First Lien Credit Agreement bear interest, at our
option, at either an adjusted LIBOR rate plus 2.00% or the lenders alternate base rate plus 1.00%,
or a combination of the two, and borrowings under the Second Lien Credit Agreement bear interest,
at our option, at either an adjusted LIBOR rate plus 5.00% or the lenders alternate base rate plus
4.00%, or a combination of the two. As of September 30, 2010, we had outstanding borrowings (before
unamortized debt discount of $43.9 million) of $680.7 million under the First Lien Credit Agreement
and $170.0 million under the Second Lien Credit Agreement.
In October 2010, we borrowed an additional $100.0 million under an incremental term loan
facility through an
amendment to the First Lien Credit Agreement. The incremental term loan facility bears
interest at our option at either an adjusted LIBOR rate plus 3.00% (subject to a LIBOR floor of
1.50%) or the lenders alternate base rate plus 2.00% (subject to an alternate base rate floor of
2.50%).
We manage our interest rate risk through the use of an interest rate swap agreement. Effective
December 31, 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap to exchange three month LIBOR rates for
fixed interest rates, resulting in the payment of an all-in fixed rate of 4.944% on an initial
notional amount of $786.3 million which amortizes on a quarterly basis until maturity at December
30, 2011. At September 30, 2010, the notional amount of the interest rate swap was $352.4 million.
As a result, as of September 30, 2010, $498.3 million of our total borrowings were effectively
subject to a variable interest rate.
A change in interest rates on variable rate debt impacts our pre-tax earnings and cash flows.
Since its redesignation on September 30, 2008, our interest rate swap has qualified for hedge
accounting as a cash flow hedge. Therefore, future changes in market fluctuations related to the
effective portion of this cash flow hedge have not impacted our pre-tax earnings until the accrued
interest is recognized on the derivative and the associated hedged debt. Based on our outstanding
debt as of September 30, 2010, and assuming that our mix of debt instruments, interest rate swap
and other variables remain the same, the annualized effect of a one percentage point change in
variable interest rates would have a pre-tax impact on our earnings and cash flows of approximately
$5.8 million. Effective October 1, 2010 the Company removed the designation of the interest rate
swap as a cash flow hedge such that future changes in fair value of the interest rate swap will be
reflected within our pre-tax earnings.
In the future, in order to manage our interest rate risk, we may enter into additional
interest rate swaps, modify our existing interest rate swap or make changes that may impact our
ability to treat our interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge. However, we do not intend or expect
to enter into derivative or interest rate swap transactions for speculative purposes.
|
|
|
ITEM 4T. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2010. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2010, our
52
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in causing material information relating to us (including
our consolidated subsidiaries) to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management on
a timely basis and to ensure the quality and timeliness of our public disclosures with SEC
disclosure obligations.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not
expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control
system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must
be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems,
no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, with the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of
simple error and mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of controls.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to claims, lawsuits and legal
proceedings. While it is not possible to ascertain the ultimate outcome of such matters, in
managements opinion, the liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts provided or covered by
insurance, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or liquidity.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The discussion of the Companys business and operations should be read together with the risk
factors contained under the heading Risk Factors in our Form 10-K and Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010, which describes various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may be
subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations, cash flows and prospects in a material adverse manner. As of
September 30, 2010, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in our Form
10-K and Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
53
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
On August 11, 2009, we commenced the IPO of our Class A common stock, par value of $0.0001 per
share, pursuant to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-153451), as amended, that
was declared effective on August 11, 2009 and our Registration Statement on Form S-1MEF (File No.
333-161270) (collectively, the Registration Statements).
Following is a description of our use of IPO proceeds since June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
We used approximately $84.0 million of the proceeds from the IPO to purchase
Chamberlin on October 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
From June 2010 through September 2010, we used approximately $0.4 million of
the proceeds from the IPO to fund expenses related to operating as a public company. |
As of October 1, 2010, we have used all of the total net proceeds from the IPO, leaving no
balance. All IPO net proceeds were used in a manner consistent with the descriptions contained in
the Registration Statements.
Issuances of Class A common stock
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed, furnished or incorporated by
reference (as stated therein) as part of this Quarterly Report.
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMDEON INC.
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ George I. Lazenby
|
|
|
|
George I. Lazenby, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Bob A. Newport
|
|
|
|
Bob A. Newport, Jr., Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
55
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
2.1*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 3, 2010 by
and among Medifax-EDI Holding Company, Medifax Merger Sub
Inc., Medifax CEA Merger Sub Inc., Chamberlin Edmonds
Holdings, Inc., Chamberlin Edmonds & Associates, Inc., and CEA
Rep, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on September 8, 2010, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of
October 1, 2010, among EBS Master LLC, Emdeon Business
Services LLC, as borrower, Medifax-EDI Holding Company, as
additional borrower, the lenders from time to time party
thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent,
collateral agent, Swingline Lender and Issuing Bank (included
as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on October 4, 2010, and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
* |
|
Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to
Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Emdeon undertakes to furnish
supplemental copies of any of the omitted schedules and
exhibits upon request by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission. |
56