e424b3
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-161076
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT NO. 5
TO THE PROSPECTUS DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2009
Resolute Energy Corporation
This Prospectus Supplement No. 5 updates, amends and supplements our Prospectus dated
September 14, 2009, as previously supplemented by Prospectus Supplement No. 1 dated September 22,
2009, Prospectus Supplement No. 2 dated November 23, 2009, Prospectus Supplement No. 3 dated March
15, 2010 and Prospectus Supplement No. 4 dated April 9, 2010.
We have attached to this Prospectus Supplement No. 5 the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 and Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A of Resolute Energy Corporation,
each filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2010. The attached information
updates, amends and supplements our Prospectus dated September 14, 2009, as previously
supplemented.
This Prospectus Supplement No. 5 should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus, as
previously supplemented. To the extent information in this Prospectus Supplement No. 5 differs
from, updates or conflicts with information contained in the Prospectus, as previously
supplemented, the information in this Prospectus Supplement No. 5 is the more current information.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should review carefully the
Risk Factors beginning on page 46 of the Prospectus dated September 14, 2009, on page 29 of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and on page 30 of the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 for a discussion of certain risks that you
should consider.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has
approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus supplement. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this prospectus supplement is May 11, 2010.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File No. 001-34464
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
27-0659371 |
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
1675 Broadway, Suite 1950 Denver, CO
|
|
80202 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(303) 534-4600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes
o No þ
As of May 7, 2010, 54,769,956 shares of the Registrants $0.0001 par value Common Stock were
outstanding.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements as that term is
defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The use of any statements
containing the words anticipate, intend, believe, estimate, project, expect, plan,
should or similar expressions are intended to identify such statements. Forward-looking
statements included in this report relate to, among other things, expected future production,
expenses and cash flows in 2010, the nature, timing and results of capital expenditure projects,
amounts of future capital expenditures, our future debt levels and liquidity and future compliance
with covenants under our revolving credit facility. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, those expectations may prove to be
incorrect. Disclosure of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from our expectations, or cautionary statements, are included under the heading Risk Factors in
this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the
date made. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or
persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary
statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statement. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations
include, among others, those factors referenced in the Risk Factors section of this report and
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and such things as:
|
|
|
volatility of oil and gas prices, including reductions in prices that would adversely
affect our revenue, income, cash flow from operations, liquidity and reserves; |
|
|
|
|
discovery, estimation, development and our ability to replace oil and gas reserves; |
|
|
|
|
our future cash flow, liquidity and financial position of the Company; |
|
|
|
|
the success of our business and financial strategy, hedging strategies and plans of the
Company; |
|
|
|
|
the amount, nature and timing of our capital expenditures, including future development
costs; |
|
|
|
|
a lack of available capital and financing; |
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness and results of our CO2 flood program; |
|
|
|
|
the success of the development plan and production from our Aneth Field Properties; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and amount of future production of oil and gas; |
|
|
|
|
exploratory drilling in the Bakken trend of the Williston Basin; |
|
|
|
|
availability of drilling and production equipment; |
|
|
|
|
success of refracs scheduled in the Muddy formation; |
|
|
|
|
inaccuracy in reserve estimates and expected production rates; |
|
|
|
|
our operating costs and other expenses; |
|
|
|
|
the success in marketing oil and gas; |
|
|
|
|
competition in the oil and gas industry; |
|
|
|
|
uninsured or underinsured losses in, or operational problems affecting, our operations; |
|
|
|
|
the impact and costs related to compliance with or changes in laws or regulations
governing our oil and natural gas operations; |
|
|
|
|
our relationship with the Navajo Nation and Navajo Nation Oil and Gas, as well as the
timing of when certain purchase rights held by Navajo Nation Oil and Gas become
exercisable; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of weather and the occurrence of disasters, such as fires, floods and other
events and natural disasters; |
|
|
|
|
environmental liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated CO2 supply to be sourced from Kinder Morgan; |
|
|
|
|
risks related to our level of indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
developments in oil-producing and gas-producing countries;
|
|
|
|
the success of strategic plans, expectations and objectives of our future operations; |
|
|
|
|
loss of senior management or technical personnel; |
|
|
|
|
acquisitions and other business opportunities (or the lack thereof) that may be
presented to and pursued by us; |
|
|
|
|
risk factors discussed or referenced in this report and in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 30, 2010; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors, many of which are beyond our control. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,373 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
28,918 |
|
|
|
27,047 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6,945 |
|
|
|
7,050 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
7,748 |
|
|
|
6,958 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
47,534 |
|
|
|
43,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, full cost method of accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved |
|
|
13,189 |
|
|
|
7,306 |
|
Proved |
|
|
640,971 |
|
|
|
634,383 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
Accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(21,834 |
) |
|
|
(11,323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
634,809 |
|
|
|
632,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
14,781 |
|
|
|
12,965 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
4,935 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
4,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
706,734 |
|
|
$ |
693,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
42,557 |
|
|
$ |
42,508 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
23,399 |
|
|
|
20,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
65,956 |
|
|
|
62,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt |
|
|
115,400 |
|
|
|
109,575 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
9,383 |
|
|
|
9,217 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
55,260 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
65,012 |
|
|
|
62,467 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
308,267 |
|
|
|
299,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 225,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding
53,160,375 and 53,154,883 shares at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
432,876 |
|
|
|
432,650 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(34,414 |
) |
|
|
(39,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
398,467 |
|
|
|
393,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
706,734 |
|
|
$ |
693,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
- 1 -
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
$ |
35,857 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
4,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
41,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating |
|
|
13,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
6,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization, and asset retirement obligation accretion |
|
|
10,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,653 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Write-off of deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
32,914 |
|
|
|
3,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
8,218 |
|
|
|
(3,805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains on derivative instruments |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(829 |
) |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
7,389 |
|
|
|
(3,347 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
(2,685 |
) |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,704 |
|
|
$ |
(2,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Common stock, subject to redemption |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
49,906 |
|
|
|
45,105 |
|
Common stock, subject to redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,560 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
- 2 -
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010 |
|
|
53,155 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
432,650 |
|
|
$ |
(39,118 |
) |
|
$ |
393,537 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock and
equity based compensation |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,704 |
|
|
|
4,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
53,160 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
432,876 |
|
|
$ |
(34,414 |
) |
|
$ |
398,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
- 3 -
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,704 |
|
|
$ |
(2,209 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and asset retirement obligation accretion |
|
|
10,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-off of deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments |
|
|
(2,346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
(1,112 |
) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
(849 |
) |
Accounts payable related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
14,619 |
|
|
|
(631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents held in trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,007 |
|
Purchase of marketable securities held in trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249,965 |
) |
Oil and gas exploration and development expenditures ` |
|
|
(12,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties and other |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of other property and equipment |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(14,488 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from bank borrowings |
|
|
52,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of bank borrowings |
|
|
(46,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(4,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
2,373 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
- 4 -
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Organization and Nature of Business
Resolute Energy Corporation (Resolute or the Company), a Delaware corporation incorporated
on July 28, 2009, was formed to consummate a business combination with Hicks Acquisition Company I,
Inc. (HACI), a Delaware corporation incorporated on February 26, 2007. Resolute is an independent
oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil,
gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The Company conducts all of its activities in the United
States of America, principally in the Paradox Basin in southeastern Utah and the Powder River Basin
in Wyoming.
HACI was a blank check company that was formed to acquire one or more businesses or assets.
HACIs initial public offering (the Offering) was consummated on October 3, 2007, and HACI
received proceeds of approximately $529.1 million. HACI sold to the public 55,200,000 units (one
share and one warrant) at a price of $10.00 per unit. Simultaneous with the consummation of the
Offering, HACI consummated the private sale of 7,000,000 warrants (Sponsor Warrants) to HH-HACI,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (Sponsor), at a price of $1.00 per Sponsor Warrant,
generating gross proceeds, before expenses, of $7.0 million (Private Placement). Net proceeds
received from the consummation of both the Offering and Private Placement of Sponsor Warrants
totaled approximately $536.1 million, net of underwriters commissions and offering costs. HACI had
neither engaged in any operations nor generated any operating revenue prior to the business
combination with Resolute.
On September 25, 2009 (Acquisition Date), HACI consummated a business combination under the
terms of a Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement (Acquisition Agreement) with Resolute and
Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC (Sub), whereby, through a series of transactions, HACIs stockholders
collectively acquired a majority of the outstanding shares of Resolute common stock (the Resolute
Transaction). Immediately prior to the consummation of the Resolute Transaction, Resolute owned,
directly or indirectly, 100% of the equity interests of Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC
(Resources), WYNR, LLC (WYNR), BWNR, LLC (BWNR), RNRC Holdings, Inc. (RNRC), and Resolute
Wyoming, Inc. (RWI), and owned a 99.996% equity interest in Resolute Aneth, LLC (Aneth),
(collectively, Predecessor Resolute). The entities comprising Predecessor Resolute prior to the
Resolute Transaction were wholly owned by Sub (except for Aneth, which was owned 99.996%), which in
turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of Resolute Holdings, LLC (Holdings).
Note 2 Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Resolute Transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method, with HACI as the
accounting acquirer, and resulted in a new basis of accounting reflecting the fair values of the
Predecessor Resolute assets and liabilities at the Acquisition Date. Accordingly, the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements are presented on Resolutes new basis of accounting.
HACI is the surviving entity for accounting purposes, and periods prior to September 25, 2009
reflected in this report represent activity related to HACIs formation, its initial public
offering and identification and consummation of a business combination. The operations of
Predecessor Resolute have been incorporated beginning September 25, 2009. The condensed
consolidated financial statements include the historical accounts of HACI and, subsequent to the
Acquisition Date, include Resolute and its subsidiaries.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim
financial reporting and Regulation S-X for interim financial reporting. Except as disclosed
herein, there has been no material change from the information disclosed in the notes to Resolutes
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a
fair presentation of the interim financial information have been included. Operating results for
the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
full year. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In connection with the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements,
Resolute evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date. Certain prior period amounts
have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Significant Accounting Policies
The significant accounting policies followed by Resolute are set forth in Note 2 Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies to Resolutes consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009. These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements are to be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements appearing in Resolutes Annual
Report on Form 10-K and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2009.
- 5 -
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs are amortized over the estimated life of the related obligation. The unamortized balance of these costs was approximately
$4.0 million as of March 31, 2010.
Assumptions, Judgments and Estimates
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make various assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and in the disclosures of commitments and
contingencies. Changes in these assumptions, judgments and estimates will occur as a result of the
passage of time and the occurrence of future events. Accordingly, actual results could differ from
amounts previously established.
Significant estimates with regard to the condensed consolidated financial statements include
the estimate of proved oil and gas reserve volumes and the related present value of estimated
future net cash flows and the ceiling test applied to capitalized oil and gas properties, the
estimated cost and timing related to asset retirement obligations, the estimated fair value of
derivative assets and liabilities, the estimated expense for share based compensation and
depletion, depreciation, and amortization.
Note 3 Accounting Standards Update
In January of 2010, the FASB issued additional guidance to improve disclosure requirements
related to fair value measurements and disclosures. Specifically, this guidance requires
disclosures about transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements, activity in Level
3 fair value measurements (See Note 14 for Level 1, 2 and 3 definitions), greater disaggregation of
the amounts on the condensed consolidated balance sheets that are subject to fair value
measurements and additional disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used in fair
value measurements. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 31, 2009, except for disclosure of Level 3 fair value measurement roll forward
activity, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. This
guidance was adopted in the first quarter of 2010 and had no impact on the condensed consolidated
financial statements other than the additional disclosures.
Note 4 Asset Retirement Obligation
Asset retirement obligations relate to future costs associated with the plugging and
abandonment of oil and gas wells, removal of equipment and facilities from leased acreage and
returning such land to its original condition. The fair value of a liability for an asset
retirement obligation is recorded in the period in which it is incurred and the cost of such
liability is recorded as an increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset by the
same amount. The liability is accreted each period and the capitalized cost is depleted on a
units-of-production basis as part of the full cost pool. Revisions to estimated retirement
obligations result in adjustments to the related capitalized asset and corresponding liability.
The restricted cash of $14.8 million located on the Companys condensed consolidated balance
sheet at March 31, 2010 in non-current other assets is legally restricted for the purpose of
settling asset retirement obligations related to Predecessor Resolutes purchase of properties from
a subsidiary of ExxonMobil Corporation and its affiliates.
Resolutes estimated asset retirement obligation liability is based on estimated economic
lives, estimates as to the cost to abandon the wells in the future, and federal and state
regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using a credit- adjusted risk-free rate
estimated at the time the liability is incurred or revised. Revisions to the liability could occur
due to changes in estimated abandonment costs or well economic lives, or if federal or state
regulators enact new requirements regarding the abandonment of wells. Asset retirement obligations
are valued utilizing Level 3 fair value measurement inputs.
The following table provides a reconciliation of Resolutes asset retirement obligations for
the three months ended March 31, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Asset retirement obligations at beginning of period * |
|
$ |
10,438 |
|
Additional liability incurred |
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
202 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
Revisions to previous estimates |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations at end of period |
|
$ |
9,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
At December 31, 2009 $1,221,000 of asset retirement obligations were accrued in accounts
payable and accrued expenses. |
- 6 -
Note 5 Oil and Gas Properties
Resolute uses the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities. All
costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development of properties, including costs of
unsuccessful exploration, costs of surrendered and abandoned leaseholds, delay lease rentals and
the fair value of estimated future costs of site restoration, dismantlement and abandonment
activities, improved recovery systems and a portion of general and administrative expenses are
capitalized on a country-wide basis (the Cost Center).
Resolute conducts tertiary recovery projects on certain of its oil and gas properties in order
to recover additional hydrocarbons that are not recoverable from primary or secondary recovery
methods. Under the full cost method, all development costs are capitalized at the time incurred.
Development costs include charges associated with access to and preparation of well locations,
drilling and equipping development wells, test wells, and service wells including injection wells,
and acquiring, constructing, and installing production facilities and providing for improved
recovery systems. Improved recovery systems include all related facility development costs and the
cost of the acquisition of tertiary injectants, primarily purchased carbon dioxide
(CO2). The development cost related to the purchase of CO2 is incurred
solely for the purpose of gaining access to incremental reserves that would not be recoverable
without the injection of such CO2. The accumulation of injected CO2, in
combination with additional purchased and recycled CO2, provides future economic value
over the life of the project.
In contrast, other costs related to the daily operation of the improved recovery systems are
considered production costs and are expensed as incurred. These costs include, but are not limited
to, compression, electricity, separation, re-injection of recovered CO2 and water, and
reservoir pressure maintenance.
Capitalized general and administrative and operating costs include salaries, employee
benefits, costs of consulting services and other specifically identifiable costs and do not include
costs related to production operations, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Resolute
capitalized general and administrative and operating costs related to its acquisition, exploration
and development activities of $0.2 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2010.
Investments in unproved properties are not depleted, pending determination of the existence of
proved reserves. The Companys investments in unproved properties are related to exploration plays
in the Black Warrior Basin in Alabama, the Big Horn Basin in Wyoming and the Williston Basin in
North Dakota. Unproved properties are assessed at least annually to ascertain whether impairment
has occurred. Unproved properties whose costs are individually significant are assessed
individually by considering the primary lease terms of the properties, the holding period of the
properties, and geographic and geologic data obtained relating to the properties. Where it is not
practicable to assess individually the amount of impairment of properties for which costs are not
individually significant, such properties are grouped for purposes of assessing impairment. The
amount of impairment assessed is added to the costs to be amortized, or is reported as a period
expense as appropriate.
No gain or loss is recognized upon the sale or abandonment of undeveloped or producing oil and
gas properties unless the sale represents a significant portion of oil and gas properties and the
gain or loss significantly alters the relationship between the capitalized costs and proved oil
reserves of the Cost Center.
Depletion and amortization of oil and gas properties is computed on the unit-of-production
method based on proved reserves. Amortizable costs include estimates of asset retirement
obligations and future development costs of proved reserves, including, but not limited to, costs
to drill and equip development wells, constructing and installing production and processing
facilities, and improved recovery systems, including the cost of required future CO2
purchases.
Pursuant to full cost accounting rules, Resolute must perform a ceiling test each quarter on
its proved oil and gas assets. The ceiling test requires that capitalized costs less related
accumulated depletion and deferred income taxes for the Cost Center may not exceed the sum of (1)
the present value of future net revenue from estimated production of proved oil and gas reserves
using current prices, excluding the future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement
obligations that have been accrued on the balance sheet, and a discount factor of 10%; plus (2) the
cost of properties not being amortized, if any; plus (3) the lower of cost or estimated fair value
of unproved properties included in the costs being amortized, if any; less (4) income tax effects
related to differences in the book and tax basis of oil and gas properties (the full cost
ceiling). Should the net capitalized costs for the Cost Center exceed the full cost ceiling, an
impairment charge would be recognized to the extent of the excess capitalized costs.
The Companys full cost pool is primarily comprised of assets attributable to the Resolute
Transaction. In accordance with Regulation S-X Article 4-10 and rules for full cost accounting
for proved oil and gas properties, Resolute performed a ceiling test at March 31, 2010 and at
December 31, 2009 using its reserve estimates prepared in accordance with the recently promulgated
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. At March 31, 2010, the full cost ceiling
exceeded capitalized costs. At December 31, 2009, total capitalized costs exceeded the full cost
ceiling by approximately $150 million; however, no impairment was recognized at December 31, 2009,
as the Company requested and received an exemption from
- 7 -
the SEC to exclude the Resolute
Transaction from the full cost ceiling assessment for a period of twelve months following the
acquisition, provided the Company can demonstrate that the fair value of the acquired
properties exceeds the carrying value in the interim periods through June 30, 2010. The request
for exemption was made because the Company could demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the
fair value of the Resolute Transaction oil and gas properties exceed unamortized cost at the
Acquisition Date and at December 31, 2009.
At the Acquisition Date, Resolute valued its oil and gas properties using NYMEX forward strip
prices for a period of five years and then held prices flat thereafter. The Company also used
various discount rates and other risk factors depending on the classification of reserves.
Management believes this internal pricing model reflected the fair value of the assets acquired.
While commodity prices have increased since September 30, 2009, the Company recognizes that
due to the volatility associated with oil and gas prices future realized commodity prices could be
lower. If that were to occur and were deemed to be other than temporary, the Company would assess
the Resolute Transaction properties for impairment during the exemption period. Further, if the
Company cannot demonstrate that fair value exceeds the unamortized carrying costs during the
exemption period, the Company will recognize impairment.
Note 6 Acquisitions and Divestitures
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information in the table below summarizes the
results of operations of the Company as though the Resolute Transaction had occurred as of the
beginning of the period presented. The pro forma financial information is presented for
informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been
achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the period presented or that may
result in the future. The pro forma adjustments made are based on certain assumptions that Resolute
believes are reasonable based on currently available information.
The unaudited pro forma financial information for the three months ended March 31, 2009
combine the historical results of HACI and Predecessor Resolute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share amount) |
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
22,488 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(23,594 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(9,229 |
) |
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
Note
7 Earnings per Share
The Company computes earnings per share using the two class method. Basic net income per
share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and,
if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive shares
consist of the incremental shares issuable under the outstanding warrants and outstanding earnout
shares, which are shares of Company common stock (with voting rights) that will be forfeited if the
price of Company common stock does not exceed $15.00 per share for 20 trading days in any 30 day
trading period within five years from the date of the Resolute Transaction (Earnout Shares).
Warrants entitle the holder to purchase one share of Company common stock at a price of $13.00 per
share and expire on September 25, 2014.
The treasury stock method is used to measure the dilutive impact of potentially dilutive
shares. There are no dilutive shares for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 as (i) 34,600,000
warrants were anti-dilutive as their exercise price is greater than the average price of the
Companys common stock during the three months then ended;
(ii) 13,800,000 warrants were considered
contingently issuable as the last sales price of the Companys common stock, through March 31,
2010, has not exceeded $13.75 for any 20 days within any 30 day trading period; and (iii) Earnout
Shares are considered contingently issuable and are not included in the earnings per share
calculation until all necessary conditions for issuance are satisfied. Therefore, the impact of
48,400,000 warrants and 3,250,000 Earnout Shares outstanding during the period were not included in
the calculation of earnings per share. There was a loss during the three months ended March 31,
2009, and all potentially dilutive shares were anti-dilutive. Accordingly, 76,000,000 warrants
were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share.
The liquidation rights of the holders of the Companys common stock and common stock subject
to redemption are identical, except with respect to redemption rights for dissenting shareholders
in an acquisition by the Company. As a result, the undistributed earnings for periods prior to the
Resolute Transaction were allocated based on the contractual participation
- 8 -
rights of the common
stock and common stock subject to redemption as if the earnings for the year had been distributed.
The undistributed earnings were allocated to common stock subject to redemption based on their
pro-rata right to income earned
on Offering proceeds by the trust. Subsequent to the Resolute Transaction, no common stock
subject to redemption remains outstanding.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share for
common stock and common stock subject to redemption (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Subject to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Redemption |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Redemption |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of undistributed earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
4,704 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,314 |
) |
|
$ |
105 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of issued shares outstanding |
|
|
49,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,105 |
|
|
|
16,560 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Note 8 Related Party Transactions
HACI agreed to pay up to $10,000 a month for office space and general and administrative
services to Hicks Holdings Operating LLC (Hicks Holdings), an affiliate of HACIs founder and
chairman of the board, Thomas O. Hicks. Services commenced after the effective date of the Offering
and were terminated during 2009 due to the consummation of the Resolute Transaction.
Note 9 Long Term Debt
Resolutes credit facility is with a syndicate of banks led by Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (the Credit Facility) with Resolute as the borrower. The Credit Facility specifies a
maximum borrowing base as determined by the lenders. The determination of the borrowing base takes
into consideration the estimated value of Resolutes oil and gas properties in accordance with the
lenders customary practices for oil and gas loans. On March 30, 2010, the Company entered into an
amended and restated credit facility agreement. Under the terms of the restated agreement, the
borrowing base was increased from $240.0 million to $260.0 million and the maturity date was
extended to March 2014. At Resolutes option, the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility
accrues interest at either (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus a margin which varies from
2.25% to 3.0% or (b) the Alternative Base Rate defined as the greater of (i) the Administrative
Agents Prime Rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%, or (iii) an adjusted London
Interbank Offered Rate plus 1%, plus a margin which ranges from 1.25% to 2.0%. Each such margin is
based on the level of utilization under the borrowing base. As of March 31, 2010, the weighted
average interest rate on the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility was 3.17%.
The borrowing base is re-determined semi-annually, and the amount available for borrowing
could be increased or decreased as a result of such re-determinations. Under certain circumstances,
either Resolute or the lenders may request an interim re-determination. As of March 31, 2010,
outstanding borrowings were $115.4 million and unused availability under the borrowing base was
$136.1 million. The borrowing base availability has been reduced by $8.5 million in conjunction
with letters of credit issued to vendors at March 31, 2010. To the extent that the borrowing base,
as adjusted from time to time, exceeds the outstanding balance, no repayments of principal are
required prior to maturity. The Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the
proved oil and gas assets of Aneth and RWI, and is guaranteed by Resolutes subsidiaries.
The Credit Facility includes terms and covenants that place limitations on certain types of
activities, the payment of dividends, and require satisfaction of certain financial tests. Resolute
was in compliance with all terms and covenants of the Credit Facility at March 31, 2010.
As of May 7, 2010, Resolute had borrowings of $130.3 million under the borrowing base,
resulting in an unused availability of $121.2 million.
Note 10 Income Taxes
Income tax expense during interim periods is based on applying an estimated annual effective
income tax rate to year-to-date income, plus any significant unusual or infrequently occurring
items which are recorded in the interim period. The provision for income taxes for the three month
periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 differ from the amount that would be provided by applying
the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes. This difference
relates primarily to state income taxes and estimated permanent differences.
- 9 -
The following table summarizes the components of the provision for income taxes (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Current income tax benefit (expense) |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
$ |
26 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
(2,650 |
) |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax benefit (expense) |
|
$ |
(2,685 |
) |
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has not recorded any uncertain tax positions as of March 31, 2010 or 2009.
The Company is subject to the following material taxing jurisdictions: U.S. federal, Colorado
and Utah. The tax years that remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service are the
years 2006 through 2009. The tax years that remain open to examination by Colorado and Utah are
2005 through 2009. Resources 2007 tax return is currently under examination by the Internal
Revenue Service.
Note 11 Stockholders Equity and Equity Based Awards
Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.0001 with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from
time to time by the Board of Directors. No shares were issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010
or December 31, 2009.
Common Stock
The authorized common stock of the Company consists of 225,000,000 shares. The holders of the
common shares are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock. In addition, the holders of
the common stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Board of
Directors. At March 31, 2010, the Company had 53,160,375 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding. HACI had 69,000,000 common shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009.
Of the 53,160,375 shares of common stock outstanding at March 31, 2010, 3,250,000 are
classified as Earnout Shares. Earnout Shares are common stock of Resolute subject to forfeiture in
the event that the market price earnout target of $15.00 per share is not met by September 25,
2014. The Earnout Shares have voting rights and are transferable; however, they are not registered
for resale and do not participate in dividends until the trigger price is met.
Prior to consummation of the Resolute Transaction, holders of 30% of public common stock, less
one share, had the right to vote against any acquisition proposal and demand conversion of their
shares for a pro rata portion of cash and marketable securities held in trust, less certain
adjustments. As a result, HACI classified 16,559,999 of the total 69,000,000 common shares issued
during 2007 as common stock, subject to possible redemption for $160.8 million. The common stock
subject to redemption participated in income earned by Offering funds held in trust prior to the
Resolute Transaction. Income or loss attributable to common stock subject to redemption was
considered in the calculation of earnings per share and the deferred interest attributable to
common stock subject to possible redemption was classified as temporary equity. Upon consummation
of the Resolute Transaction, the $160.8 million temporary equity was reclassified to common stock
and additional paid-in capital and 11,592,084 shares were redeemed. The deferred interest
attributable to the shares of common stock not redeemed of $1.9 million was reclassified to
stockholders equity.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Stock
Compensation.
On July 31, 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Performance Incentive Plan (the Incentive
Plan), providing for long-term equity based awards intended as a means for the Company to attract,
motivate, retain and reward directors, officers, employees and other eligible persons through the
grant of awards and incentives for high levels of individual performance and improved financial
performance of the Company. Equity-based awards are also intended to further align the interests of
award recipients and the Companys stockholders. The Companys Board of Directors or one or more
committees appointed by the Companys Board of Directors will administer the Incentive Plan. The
maximum number of shares of Company common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards under the
Incentive Plan is 2,657,744.
The Incentive Plan authorizes stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, stock bonuses and other forms of awards that may be granted or denominated
in Company common stock or units of Company common stock, as well as cash bonus awards. The
Incentive Plan retains flexibility to offer competitive incentives and to tailor benefits to
specific needs and circumstances. Any award may be paid or settled in cash at the Companys option.
On March 16, 2010,
- 10 -
the Companys Board of Directors were granted 5,492 shares of Company common
stock under the Incentive Plan. One quarter of each Board of Director award was granted without
restriction with the remainder vesting over a service period
ending on March 16, 2013. The compensation expense to be recognized for the awards was
measured based on the Companys traded stock price on March 16, 2010.
On September 25, 2009, the Company and Sub entered into a Retention Bonus Award Agreement
calling for the award to employees of the Company of 200,000 shares of Company common stock that
would otherwise have been issued to Sub in the Resolute Transaction. Fifty percent of each
employee award was awarded without restriction and fifty percent of each employee award was granted
contingent upon the employee remaining employed by the Company for one year following the closing
of the Resolute Transaction. As of March 31, 2010, employees had forfeited 11,697 shares under this
agreement, leaving 88,303 shares unvested. The compensation expense to be recognized for the
awards was measured based on the Companys traded stock price at the date of the Resolute
Transaction. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded $0.2 million of
stock based compensation expense for this award. The remaining expense will be recognized over the
remaining vesting period ending on September 25, 2010.
Note
12 Employee Benefits
The Company offers a variety of health and benefit programs to all employees, including
medical, dental, vision, life insurance and disability insurance. The Companys executive officers
are generally eligible to participate in these employee benefit plans on the same basis as the rest
of the Companys employees. The Company offers a 401(k) plan for all eligible employees. Employee
benefit plans may be modified or terminated at any time by the Companys Board of Directors.
Time Vested Cash Awards
Prior to the Resolute Transaction, certain employees of Predecessor Resolute held time vested
cash awards (Awards). All of the Awards bear simple interest of 15% per annum commencing
January 1, 2008, and are payable in three installments, with the first installment paid on January
1, 2009 and the remaining two installments payable on January 1, 2010 and 2011. The Awards are
accounted for as deferred compensation. The annual payments are paid contingent upon the employees
continued employment with Resolute and there is potential for forfeiture of the Awards.
Accordingly, Resolute will accrue the Awards and related return for the respective year on an
annual basis. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, $0.1 million of compensation expense
related to the Awards was recognized.
Note 13 Derivative Instruments
Resolute enters into commodity derivative contracts to manage its exposure to oil and gas
price volatility. Resolute has not elected to designate derivative instruments as hedges under the
provisions of FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. As a result, these derivative
instruments are marked to market at the end of each reporting period and changes in the fair value
are recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Realized and
unrealized gains and losses from Resolutes price risk management activities are recognized in
other income (expense), with realized gains and losses recognized in the period in which the
related production is sold. The cash flows from derivatives are reported as cash flows from
operating activities unless the derivative contract is deemed to contain a financing element.
Derivatives deemed to contain a financing element are reported as financing activities in the
condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. Commodity derivative contracts may take the form of
futures contracts, swaps or options.
For financial reporting purposes, Resolute does not offset the fair value amounts of
derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty. See Note 14 for the location and fair
value amounts of Resolutes commodity derivative instruments reported in the condensed consolidated
balance sheet at March 31, 2010.
The table below summarizes the location and amount of commodity derivative instrument losses
reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
Realized losses |
|
$ |
(2,136 |
) |
Unrealized gains |
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains on derivative instruments |
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 11 -
As of March 31, 2010, Resolute had entered into certain commodity swap contracts. The
following table represents Resolutes commodity swaps through 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (NYMEX HH) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Price per |
|
Year |
|
Bbl per Day |
|
|
Hedge Price per Bbl |
|
|
MMBtu per Day |
|
|
MMBtu |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
$ |
67.24 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
$ |
9.69 |
|
2011 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
$ |
68.26 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
$ |
9.32 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
$ |
68.26 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
$ |
7.42 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
60.47 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
$ |
7.40 |
|
Resolute also uses basis swaps in connection with gas swaps in order to fix the price
differential between the NYMEX Henry Hub price and the index price at which the gas production is
sold. The table below sets forth Resolutes outstanding basis swaps as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differential per |
|
Year |
|
Index |
|
|
MMBtu per Day |
|
|
MMBtu |
|
2010 2013 |
|
Rocky Mountain NWPL |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
As of March 31, 2010, Resolute had entered into certain commodity collar contracts. The
following table represents Resolutes commodity collars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (NYMEX HH) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Price per |
|
Year |
|
Bbl per Day |
|
|
Hedge Price per Bbl |
|
|
MMBtu per Day |
|
|
MMBtu |
|
2010 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
$ |
105.00-151.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk and Contingent Features in Derivative Instruments
Resolute is exposed to credit risk to the extent of nonperformance by the counterparties in
the derivative contracts discussed above. All counterparties are lenders under Resolutes Credit
Facility. Accordingly, Resolute is not required to provide any credit support to its counterparties
other than cross collateralization with the properties securing the Credit Facility. Resolutes
derivative contracts are documented with industry standard contracts known as a Schedule to the
Master Agreement and International Swaps and Derivative Association, Inc. Master Agreement
(ISDA). Typical terms for each ISDA include credit support requirements, cross default
provisions, termination events, and set-off provisions. Resolute has set-off provisions with its
lenders that, in the event of counterparty default, allow Resolute to set-off amounts owed under
the Credit Facility or other general obligations against amounts owed for derivative contract
liabilities.
The maximum amount of loss in the event of all counterparties defaulting is $0 as of March 31,
2010, due to the set off provisions noted above.
Note 14 Fair Value Measurements
FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes
market or observable inputs as the preferred sources of values, followed by assumptions based on
hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for
determining the fair values of assets and liabilities, based on the significance level of the
following inputs:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and
model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are
observable. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable. |
An asset or liability subject to the fair value requirements is categorized within the
hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Resolutes assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in
its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. Following
is a description of the valuation methodologies used by Resolute as well as the general
classification of such instruments pursuant to the hierarchy.
- 12 -
As of March 31, 2010, Resolutes commodity derivative instruments were required to be measured
at fair value on a recurring basis. Resolute used the income approach in determining the fair value
of its derivative instruments, utilizing
present value techniques for valuing its swaps and basis swaps and option-pricing models for
valuing its collars. Inputs to these valuation techniques include published forward index prices,
volatilities, and credit risk considerations, including the incorporation of published interest
rates and credit spreads. Substantially all of these inputs are observable in the marketplace
throughout the full term of the contract, can be derived from observable data or are supported by
observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace and are therefore
designated as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
The following is a listing of Resolutes assets and liabilities required to be measured at
fair value on a recurring basis and where they are classified within the hierarchy as of March 31,
2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,600 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commodity collars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: derivative instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,748 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,935 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: derivative instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,935 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,399 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: derivative instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,399 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term liabilities: derivative instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies
CO2Take-or-Pay Agreements
Resolute is party to two take-or-pay purchase agreements, each with a different supplier,
under which Resolute has committed to buy specified volumes of CO2. The purchased
CO2 is for use in Resolutes tertiary enhanced recovery projects in Aneth Field. In each
case, Resolute is obligated to purchase a minimum daily volume of CO2 or pay for any
deficiencies at the price in effect when delivery was to have occurred. The CO2 volumes
planned for use on the enhanced recovery projects exceed the minimum daily volumes provided in
these take-or-pay purchase agreements. Therefore, Resolute expects to avoid any payments for
deficiencies.
One contract was effective July 1, 2006, with a four year term. As of March 31, 2010, future
commitments under this purchase agreement amounted to approximately $1.1 million, based on prices
in effect at March 31, 2010. The second contract was entered into on May 25, 2005, was amended on
July 1, 2007, and has a ten year term. Future commitments as of March 31, 2010 under this purchase
agreement amounted to approximately $58.2 million through June 2016 based on prices in effect on
March 31, 2010.
The annual minimum CO2 purchase obligation by year is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
CO2 Purchase Commitments |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
9,765 |
|
2011 |
|
|
15,267 |
|
2012 |
|
|
11,948 |
|
2013 |
|
|
11,543 |
|
2014 |
|
|
5,126 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
5,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
59,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 13 -
RESOLUTE NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC,
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC, WYNR, LLC, BWNR, LLC,
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.,
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Combined Statements of Operations (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
$ |
18,305 |
|
Gas |
|
|
3,324 |
|
Other |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
22,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
Lease operating |
|
|
16,295 |
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization, and asset retirement obligation accretion |
|
|
8,210 |
|
Impairment of proved properties |
|
|
13,295 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
39,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(17,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,248 |
) |
Gain on derivative instruments |
|
|
9,860 |
|
Other income |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(13,790 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(9,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(23,597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
- 14 -
RESOLUTE NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Combined Statements of Cash Flows (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(23,597 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,972 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
522 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9,792 |
|
Equity-based compensation |
|
|
960 |
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments |
|
|
461 |
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
|
238 |
|
Impairment of proved properties |
|
|
13,295 |
|
Other |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
4,597 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
233 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(8,977 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
6 |
|
Accounts payable Holdings |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
5,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition, exploration and development expenditures |
|
|
(4,099 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties |
|
|
3 |
|
Purchase of other property and equipment |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Notes receivable affiliated entities |
|
|
2 |
|
Other |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(4,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Proceeds from bank borrowings |
|
|
25,270 |
|
Payment of bank borrowings |
|
|
(28,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(3,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
7,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
Decrease to asset retirement obligations |
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures financed through current liabilities |
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
- 15 -
RESOLUTE NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Statements of Operations and of Cash Flows (UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Description of the Companies and Business
Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC (Resources), previously a Delaware corporation
incorporated on January 22, 2004 and converted to a limited liability company on September 30,
2008, Resolute Aneth, LLC (Aneth), a Delaware limited liability company established on November
12, 2004, WYNR, LLC (WYNR), a Delaware limited liability company established on August 25, 2005,
BWNR, LLC (BWNR), a Delaware limited liability company established on August 19, 2005, RNRC
Holdings, Inc. (RNRC), a Delaware corporation incorporated on September 19, 2008 and Resolute
Wyoming, Inc. (RWI) (formerly Primary Natural Resources, Inc. (PNR)), a Delaware corporation
incorporated on November 21, 2003 (the change of name to RWI was effective September 29, 2008)
(together, Predecessor Resolute or the Companies) are engaged in the acquisition, exploration,
development, and production of oil, gas and natural gas liquids (NGL), primarily in the Paradox
Basin in southeastern Utah and the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. The Companies are wholly owned
subsidiaries of Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC (Sub), which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Resolute Holdings, LLC (Holdings).
Note 2Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
On September 25, 2009 (Acquisition Date), Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. (HACI)
consummated a business combination under the terms of a Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement
(Acquisition Agreement) with Resolute Energy Corporation (Resolute), pursuant to which, through
a series of transactions, HACIs stockholders collectively acquired a majority of the outstanding
equity of the Companies (Resolute Transaction), and Resolute owns, directly or indirectly, 100%
of the equity interests of Resources, WYNR, BWNR, RNRC, and RWI, and indirectly owns a 99.996%
equity interest in Aneth.
The accompanying unaudited combined statements of operations and of cash flows of Predecessor
Resolute have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and Regulation S-X for interim
financial reporting. No combined balance sheet of Predecessor Resolute is required to be presented
as the condensed consolidated balance sheets of Resolute Energy Corporation include the acquired
balances. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals,
considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial information have been
included. Operating results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the full year. These companies are under common ownership and
common management. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in combination.
Significant Accounting Policies
The significant accounting policies followed by Resolute are set forth in Note 2 to
Predecessor Resolutes combined financial statements for the period ended September 24, 2009
appearing in Resolutes Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. These
unaudited combined interim financial statements are to be read in conjunction with the combined
financial statements and related notes for the period ended September 24, 2009.
Assumptions, Judgments, and Estimates
The preparation of the combined interim financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make various assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and in the disclosures of commitments and
contingencies. Changes in these assumptions, judgments and estimates will occur as a result of the
passage of time and the occurrence of future events. Accordingly, actual results could differ from
amounts previously established.
Significant estimates with regard to the combined financial statements include the estimated
carrying value of unproved properties, the estimate of proved oil and gas reserve volumes and the
related present value of estimated future net cash flows and the ceiling test applied to
capitalized oil and gas properties, the estimated cost and timing related to asset retirement
obligations, the estimated fair value of derivative assets and liabilities, the estimated expense
for equity based compensation and depletion, depreciation, and amortization.
- 16 -
Note 3 Oil and Gas Properties
Predecessor Resolute uses the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas producing
activities. All costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development of properties,
including costs of unsuccessful exploration, costs of surrendered and abandoned leaseholds, delay
lease rentals and the fair value of estimated future costs of site restoration, dismantlement and
abandonment activities, improved recovery systems and a portion of general and administrative
expenses are capitalized within the cost center.
Predecessor Resolute conducts tertiary recovery projects on certain of its oil and gas
properties in order to recover additional hydrocarbons that are not recoverable from primary or
secondary recovery methods. Under the full cost method, all development costs are capitalized at
the time incurred. Development costs include charges associated with access to and preparation of
well locations, drilling and equipping development wells, test wells, and service wells including
injection wells; acquiring, constructing, and installing production facilities and providing for
improved recovery systems. Improved recovery systems include all related facility development costs
and the cost of the acquisition of tertiary injectants, primarily purchased
CO2. The development cost related to CO2 purchases are
incurred solely for the purpose of gaining access to incremental reserves not otherwise
recoverable. The accumulation of injected CO2, in combination with additional
purchased and recycled CO2, provide future economic value over the life of the
project.
In contrast, other costs related to the daily operation of the improved recovery systems are
considered production costs and are expensed as incurred. These costs include, but are not limited
to, compression, electricity, separation, re-injection of recovered CO2 and
water. Costs incurred to maintain reservoir pressure are also expensed as incurred.
Capitalized general and administrative and operating costs include salaries, employee
benefits, costs of consulting services and other specifically identifiable costs and do not include
costs related to production operations, general corporate overhead or similar activities.
Predecessor Resolute capitalized general and administrative and operating costs of $0.1 million
related to its acquisition, exploration and development activities for the three month period ended
March 31, 2009.
Investments in unproved properties are not depleted, pending determination of the existence of
proved reserves. Unproved properties are assessed periodically to ascertain whether impairment has
occurred. Unproved properties whose costs are individually significant are assessed individually
by considering the primary lease terms of the properties, the holding period of the properties, and
geographic and geologic data obtained relating to the properties. Where it is not practicable to
assess individually the amount of impairment of properties for which costs are not individually
significant, such properties are grouped for purposes of assessing impairment. The amount of
impairment assessed is added to the costs to be amortized, or is reported as a period expense as
appropriate.
Pursuant to full cost accounting rules, Predecessor Resolute performed a ceiling test each
quarter on its proved oil and gas assets. The ceiling test requires that capitalized costs less
related accumulated depletion and deferred income taxes for each cost center may not exceed the sum
of (1) the present value of future net revenue from estimated production of proved oil and gas
reserves using current prices, excluding the future cash outflows associated with settling asset
retirement obligations that have been accrued on the balance sheet, and a discount factor of 10%;
plus (2) the cost of properties not being amortized, if any; plus (3) the lower of cost or
estimated fair value of unproved properties included in the costs being amortized, if any; less (4)
income tax effects related to differences in the book and tax basis of oil and gas properties.
Should the net capitalized costs for a cost center exceed the sum of the components noted above, an
impairment charge would be recognized to the extent of the excess capitalized costs. As a result
of this limitation on capitalized costs, the accompanying combined financial statements include a
provision for an impairment of oil and gas property cost for the three months ended March 31, 2009
of $13.3 million.
No gain or loss is recognized upon the sale or abandonment of undeveloped or producing oil and
gas properties unless the sale represents a significant portion of oil and gas properties and the
gain or loss significantly alters the relationship between the capitalized costs and proved oil
reserves of the cost center.
Depletion and amortization of oil and gas properties is computed on the unit-of-production
method based on proved reserves. Amortizable costs include estimates of asset retirement
obligations and future development costs of proved reserves, including, but not limited to, costs
to drill and equip development wells, constructing and installing production and processing
facilities, and improved recovery systems, including the cost of required future CO2
purchases.
Note 4 Asset Retirement Obligations
Asset retirement obligations relate to future costs associated with the plugging and
abandonment of oil and gas wells, removal of equipment and facilities from leased acreage and
returning such land to its original condition. The fair value of a liability for an asset
retirement obligation is recorded in the period in which it is incurred and the cost of such
liability increases the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset by the same amount. The
liability is accreted each period and the
- 17 -
capitalized cost is depleted on a units-of-production basis as part of the full cost pool.
Revisions to estimated asset retirement obligations result in adjustments to the related
capitalized asset and corresponding liability.
Predecessor Resolutes estimated asset retirement obligation liability is based on estimated
economic lives, estimates as to the cost to abandon the wells in the future, and federal and state
regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate
estimated at the time the liability is incurred or revised. Revisions to the liability could occur
due to changes in estimated abandonment costs or well economic lives, or if federal or state
regulators enact new requirements regarding the abandonment of wells.
The following table provides a reconciliation of Predecessor Resolutes asset retirement
obligation for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Asset retirement obligations at beginning of period |
|
$ |
9,828 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
238 |
|
Additional liability incurred |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Revisions to previous estimates |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations at end of period |
|
|
9,941 |
|
Less current asset retirement obligations |
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term asset retirement obligations |
|
$ |
8,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5Related Party Transactions
Resources has received payments due Holdings for Holdings transactions not related to
Predecessor Resolute. Such payments have not yet been fully reimbursed to Holdings. Payments to
Holdings are reflected on the combined statements of cash flows under the caption Accounts Payable
Holdings.
Note 6Long Term Debt
First Lien Facility
Predecessor Resolutes credit facility was with a syndicate of banks led by Wachovia Bank,
National Association (the First Lien Facility) with Aneth as the borrower. At Aneths option, the
outstanding balance under the First Lien Facility accrued interest at either (a) the London
Interbank Offered Rate, plus a margin which varied from 1.5% to 2.25%, or (b) the Alternative Base
Rate defined as the greater of (i) the Administrative Agents Prime Rate, (ii) the Administrative
Agents Base CD rate plus 1%, or (iii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%, plus a margin
which varied from 0% to 0.75%. Each such margin was based on the level of utilization under the
borrowing base. As of March 31, 2009 the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding balance
under the facility was approximately 3.64%
On September 25, 2009, Resolute repaid $99.5 million outstanding under the First Lien Facility
with cash received from the Resolute Transaction.
Second Lien Facility
Predecessor Resolutes term loan was with a group of lenders, with Wilmington Trust FSB as the
agent (the Second Lien Facility) and with Aneth as the borrower. Balances outstanding under the
Second Lien Facility accrued interest at either (a) the adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate plus
the applicable margin of 4.5%, or (b) the greater of (i) the Administrative Agents Prime Rate,
(ii) the Administrative Agents Base CD rate plus 1%, or (iii) the Alternative Base Rate, plus the
applicable margin of 3.5%. As of March 31, 2009 the weighted average interest rate on the
outstanding balance under the facility was approximately 3.85%.
On September 25, 2009, Resolute repaid all amounts outstanding under the Second Lien Facility
with cash received from the Resolute Transaction.
- 18 -
Note 7 Income Taxes
Income tax expense during interim periods is based on applying an estimated annual effective
income tax rate to year-to-date income, plus any significant unusual or infrequently occurring
items which are recorded in the interim period. The provision for income taxes for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 differs from the amount that would be provided by applying the
statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes primarily related to
state income taxes and estimated permanent differences.
The following table summarizes the components of the provision for income taxes (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Current income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
State |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
Valuation allowance* |
|
|
(8,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax benefit (expense)** |
|
$ |
(9,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Resolute recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset at March 31,
2009, as Predecessor Resolute believed that this asset may not be realized if it was unable to
generate future taxable income. |
|
** |
|
Tax expense (benefit) is calculated based on taxable income of RNRC and RWI, which are
taxable entities. Aneth, Sub, BWNR and WYNR are pass-through entities for federal and state income
tax purposes. As such, neither current nor deferred income taxes are recognized by these entities. |
Note 8 Shareholders/Members Equity and Equity Based Awards
Common Stock
At March 31, 2009, RNRC and RWI each had 1,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 and
$1.00 per share, authorized, issued and outstanding.
Members Equity
At March 31, 2009, members equity included Aneth, WYNR, BWNR and Resources.
Incentive Interests
Resources
Incentive Units were granted by Holdings to certain of its members who were also officers,
as well as to other employees of Resources. The Incentive Units were intended to be compensation
for services provided to Resources. The original terms of the five tiers of Incentive Units are as
follows. Tier I units vest ratably over three years, but are subject to forfeiture if payout is not
realized. Tier I payout is realized at the return of members invested capital and a specified rate
of return. Tiers II through V vest upon certain specified multiples of cash payout. Incentive Units
are forfeited if an employee of Predecessor Resolute is either terminated for cause or resigns as
an employee. Any Incentive Units that are forfeited by an individual employee revert to the
founding senior managers of Predecessor Resolute and, therefore, the number of Tier II through V
Incentive Units is not expected to change.
On June 27, 2007, Holdings made a capital distribution of $100 million to its equity owners
from the proceeds of the Second Lien Facility. This distribution caused both the Tier I payout to
be realized and the Tier I Incentive Units to vest. As a result of the distribution, management
determined that it was probable that Tiers II-V incentive unit payouts would be achieved.
Predecessor Resolute recorded $1.0 million of equity based compensation expense in
general and administrative expense in the combined statements of operations for the three months
ended March 31 2009.
Predecessor Resolute amortizes the estimated fair value of the Incentive Units over the
remaining estimated vesting period using the straight-line method. The estimated weighted average
fair value remaining of the Incentive Units was calculated using a discounted future net cash flows
model. No Incentive Units vested during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
- 19 -
At March 31, 2009, there were 17,797,801 incentive units outstanding, of which 6,190,539 were
not vested and have a weighted average grant date fair value of $2.08 per unit. There were no
grants or forfeitures during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Note 9 Derivative Instruments
Predecessor Resolute enters into commodity derivative contracts to manage its exposure to oil
and gas price volatility. Predecessor Resolute has not elected to designate derivative instruments
as cash flow hedges under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. As a
result, these derivative instruments are marked to market at the end of each reporting period and
changes in the fair value are recorded in the accompanying combined statements of operations.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses from Predecessor Resolutes price risk management
activities are recognized in other income (expense), with realized gains and losses recognized in
the period in which the related production is sold. The cash flows from derivatives are reported as
cash flows from operating activities unless the derivative contract is deemed to contain a
financing element. Derivatives deemed to contain a financing element are reported as financing
activities in the statement of cash flows. Commodity derivative contracts may take the form of
futures contracts, swaps or options.
As of March 31, 2009, Predecessor Resolute had entered into certain commodity swap contracts.
The following table represents Predecessor Resolutes commodity swaps at March 31, 2009 with
respect to its estimated oil and gas production from proved developed producing properties through
2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (NYMEX HH) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI) |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Price per |
Year |
|
Bbl per Day |
|
Hedge Price per Bbl |
|
MMBtu per Day |
|
MMBtu |
2009 |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
$ |
63.07 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
9.93 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
$ |
57.83 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
$ |
9.69 |
|
2011 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
$ |
68.26 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
$ |
9.32 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
$ |
68.26 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
$ |
7.42 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
60.47 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
$ |
7.40 |
|
Predecessor Resolute also used basis swaps in connection with gas swaps in order to fix
the price differential between the NYMEX Henry Hub price and the index price at which the gas
production is sold. The table below sets forth Predecessor Resolutes outstanding basis swaps as of
March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differential per |
Year |
|
Index |
|
MMBtu per Day |
|
MMBtu |
2009 2013 |
|
Rocky Mountain NWPL |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
As of March 31, 2009, Predecessor Resolute had entered into certain commodity collar
contracts. The following table represents Predecessor Resolutes commodity collars at March 31,
2009 with respect to its estimated oil and gas production from proved developed producing
properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (NYMEX HH) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI) |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Price per |
Year |
|
Bbl per Day |
|
Hedge Price per Bbl |
|
MMBtu per Day |
|
MMBtu |
2009 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
$ |
105.00-151.00 |
|
|
|
3,288 |
|
|
$ |
5.00-9.35 |
|
2010 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
$ |
105.00-151.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes the location and amount of commodity derivative instrument
gains and losses reported in the combined statements of operations for the periods presented below
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
10,321 |
|
Unrealized losses |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total: gain on derivative instruments |
|
$ |
9,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Fair Value Measurements
FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures clarifies the definition of fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. Predecessor Resolute fully adopted FASB ASC Topic 820 as of January 1, 2009. The full
adoption did not have a material impact on Predecessor Resolutes combined financial statements or
its disclosures.
- 20 -
FASB ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exact price) in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. The statement establishes market or observable inputs as the preferred
sources of values, followed by assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of
market inputs. The statement establishes a hierarchy for grouping these assets and liabilities,
based on the significance level of the following inputs:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and
model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are
observable. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable. |
An asset or liability subject to the fair value requirements is categorized within the
hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Predecessor Resolutes assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or
liability. Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by Predecessor Resolute
as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the hierarchy.
As of March 31, 2009, Predecessor Resolutes commodity derivative instruments were required to
be measured at fair value. Predecessor Resolute used the income approach in determining the fair
value of its derivative instruments, utilizing present value techniques for valuing its swaps and
basis swaps and option-pricing models for valuing its collars. Inputs to these valuation techniques
include published forward index prices, volatilities, and credit risk considerations, including the
incorporation of published interest rates and credit spreads. Substantially all of these inputs are
observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the contract, can be derived from
observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the
marketplace and are therefore designated as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
Note 11 Commitments and Contingencies
CO2Take-or-Pay Agreements
Predecessor Resolute entered into two take-or-pay purchase agreements, each with a different
supplier, under which Predecessor Resolute has committed to buy specified volumes of
CO2. The purchased CO2 is for use in Predecessor Resolutes tertiary enhanced
recovery projects in Aneth Field. In each case, Predecessor Resolute is obligated to purchase a
minimum daily volume of CO2 or pay for any deficiencies at the price in effect when
delivery was to have occurred. The CO2volumes planned for use on the enhanced recovery
projects exceed the minimum daily volumes provided in this take-or-pay purchase agreement.
Therefore, Predecessor Resolute expects to avoid any payments for deficiencies.
One contract was effective July 1, 2006, with a four year term. As of March 31, 2009, future
commitments under this purchase agreement amounted to approximately $3.0 million, based on prices
in effect at March 31, 2009. The second contract was entered into on May 25, 2005, was amended on
July 1, 2007, and had a ten year term. Future commitments under this purchase agreement amounted to
approximately $31.8 million through June 2016 based on prices in effect on March 31, 2009. The
annual minimum obligation by year is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitments |
|
|
|
(millions) |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
2010 |
|
|
7.8 |
|
2011 |
|
|
6.1 |
|
2012 |
|
|
4.8 |
|
2013 |
|
|
4.6 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 21 -
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
References to the Company, us or we refer to Resolute Energy Corporation (Resolute), a
corporation formed to consummate a business combination between Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
(HACI), Resolute and Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC. Predecessor Resolute refers to Resolute
Natural Resources Company, LLC (Resources), WYNR, LLC (WYNR), BWNR, LLC (BWNR), RNRC
Holdings, Inc. (RNRC), and Resolute Wyoming, Inc. (RWI) (formerly known as Primary Natural
Resources, Inc. (PNR)), and Resolute Aneth, LLC (Aneth).
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as with the financial statements
and related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. Due to the nature of the Resolute
Transaction, two sets of financial statements are presented in this report. The first set covers
the reporting company, Resolute, including a pro forma presentation of Resolute giving effect to
the Resolute Transaction as if it had occurred on January 1, 2009. The second set covers the
predecessor company, Predecessor Resolute, for the period ended March 31, 2009. This discussion is
presented in one combined section relating to the business of Resolute for the period ended March
31, 2010 and the comparative data with respect to Predecessor Resolute and HACI for the period
ended March 31, 2009.
Overview
Resolute is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition, exploration,
development and production of oil, gas and hydrocarbon liquids. Resolutes strategy is to grow
through acquisition, exploration, exploitation and industry standard enhanced oil recovery
projects.
Resolute focuses its efforts on increasing reserves and production while controlling costs at
a level that is appropriate for long-term operations. Resolutes future earnings and cash flow from
existing operations are dependent on a variety of factors including commodity prices, exploitation
and recovery activities and its ability to manage its overall cost structure at a level that allows
for profitable production.
Resolutes management uses a variety of financial and operational measurements to analyze its
operating performance. These measurements include: (i) production levels, trends and prices, (ii)
reserve and production volumes and trends, (iii) operating expenses and general and administrative
expenses, (iv) operating cash flow, and (v) EBITDA. These measurements are to be read in
conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations appearing in Resolutes Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
The Resolute Transaction
On September 25, 2009 (the Acquisition Date), Resolute consummated a business combination
under the terms of a Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement dated as of August 2, 2009 (the
Acquisition Agreement) by and among us, HACI, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC (Sub), Resolute
Subsidiary Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resolute (Merger Sub), Resolute Aneth, LLC,
a subsidiary of Sub (Aneth), Resolute Holdings, LLC and HH-HACI, L.P. (the Sponsor), pursuant
to which HACI stockholders acquired a majority of the outstanding shares of capital stock of
Resolute and Resolute acquired all of the operating companies previously owned by Sub (the
Resolute Transaction). Prior to September 25, 2009, HACI was a blank check company formed for the
purpose of acquiring, or acquiring control of, one or more businesses or assets.
As a result of the Resolute Transaction, through a series of transactions, shareholders of
HACI common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, acquired approximately 82% of the outstanding
shares of Resolute common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (Resolute common stock), and Sub
owned approximately 18% of the outstanding Resolute common stock, excluding, in each case,
warrants, options and the Resolute Earnout Shares (as defined below). HACI transferred to Aneth the
$327 million remaining in its trust account, after payment of expenses of $11 million and
redemption of HACI common stock and warrants in the amount of $201 million, in exchange for a
membership interest in Aneth. Sub then contributed its direct and indirect ownership interests in
its operating subsidiaries to HACI. Merger Sub merged with and into HACI, with HACI surviving the
merger and continuing as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resolute. As required by the Acquisition
Agreement, the $327 million was used to repay amounts owed under Aneths credit facilities.
In exchange for Subs contribution of its operating subsidiaries and as a result of the other
transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement, Sub acquired (i) 9,200,000 shares of
Resolute common stock, (ii) 4,600,000 warrants to purchase Resolute common stock at a price of
$13.00 per share, with a five year life and subject to a trigger price of $13.75 per share (the
Resolute Founders Warrants), (iii) 2,333,333 warrants to purchase Resolute common stock at a
price of $13.00 per share, with a five year life (the Resolute Sponsors Warrants), and (iv)
1,385,000 shares of Resolute common stock subject to forfeiture in the event a trigger price of
$15.00 is not exceeded within five years following the closing of the Resolute
- 22 -
Transaction and that
have no economic rights until such trigger is met (the Resolute Earnout Shares). Of the 9,200,000
shares of Resolute common stock issuable to Sub, 200,000 were issued to employees of
Predecessor Resolute who became employees of Resolute upon closing of the Resolute Transaction in
recognition of their services. 100,000 shares vested immediately and the remaining 100,000 shares
will vest on the one year anniversary of the Acquisition Date, provided the recipient remains
employed by the Company through that date. At the effective time of the Resolute Transaction, each
outstanding share of HACI common stock was converted into the right to receive one share of
Resolute common stock.
In connection with the Resolute Transaction, 7,335,000 shares of HACIs common stock and
4,600,000 warrants to purchase HACI common stock held by the Sponsor were cancelled and forfeited
and an additional 1,865,000 shares held by the Sponsor were converted into 1,865,000 Resolute
Earnout Shares. As a result of the consummation of the Resolute Transaction, the Sponsor, together
with its initial pre-public offering stockholders, owned (i) 4,600,000 shares of Resolute common
stock, (ii) 9,200,000 Resolute Founders Warrants, (iii) 4,666,667 Resolute Sponsors Warrants, and
(iv) 1,865,000 Resolute Earnout Shares.
At the effective time of the Resolute Transaction, each of the 55,200,000 outstanding warrants
that were issued in HACIs initial public offering (the Public Warrants) was converted, at the
election of the warrantholder, into either (i) the right to receive $0.55 in cash or (ii) when
properly tendered, the right to receive one warrant to purchase one share of Resolute common stock
(a Resolute Warrant) at a exercise price of $13.00, subject to adjustment. The number of total
Resolute Warrants was limited to 27,600,000. Warrants that were voted against the Warrant Amendment
(as defined below) were, at the effective time of the Resolute Transaction, converted into the
right to receive $0.55 in cash. Because more than 50% of the HACI warrantholders elected to receive
Resolute Warrants, the properly voted and tendered warrants were exchanged pro rata. The Resolute
Warrants have a five year life and are subject to redemption upon 30 days prior notice (as defined)
at $.01 per Resolute Warrant, at the Companys option, when the price of Resolutes common stock
equals or exceed $18.00 per share for a specified period.
Factors That Significantly Affect Resolutes Financial Results
Revenue, cash flow from operations and future growth depend substantially on factors beyond
Resolutes control, such as economic, political and regulatory developments and competition from
other sources of energy. Crude oil prices have historically been volatile and may be expected to
fluctuate widely in the future. Sustained periods of low prices for crude oil could materially and
adversely affect Resolutes financial position, its results of operations, the quantities of oil
and gas that it can economically produce, and its ability to obtain capital.
Like all businesses engaged in the exploration for and production of oil and gas, Resolute
faces the challenge of natural production declines. As initial reservoir pressures are depleted,
oil and gas production from a given well decreases. Thus, an oil and gas exploration and production
company depletes part of its asset base with each unit of oil or gas it produces. Resolute attempts
to overcome this natural decline by implementing secondary and tertiary recovery techniques and by
acquiring or discovering more reserves than it produces. Resolutes future growth will depend on
its ability to enhance production levels from existing reserves and to continue to add reserves in
excess of production. Resolute will maintain its focus on costs necessary to produce its reserves
as well as the costs necessary to add reserves through production enhancement, drilling and
acquisitions. Resolutes ability to make capital expenditures to increase production from existing
reserves and to acquire more reserves is dependent on availability of capital resources, and can be
limited by many factors, including the ability to obtain capital in a cost-effective manner and to
timely obtain permits and regulatory approvals.
- 23 -
Results of Operations
The following table reflects the components of our production and sales prices and sets forth
our operating revenues, costs and expenses on a barrels of oil equivalent (Boe) basis for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 for Resolute and Predecessor Resolute, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute |
|
Predecessor Resolute |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales (Mboe) |
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
692 |
|
Average daily sales (Boe/d) |
|
|
7,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Sales Price ($/Boe): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales price (excluding derivative settlements) |
|
$ |
64.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.48 |
|
Average sales price (including derivative settlements) |
|
|
61.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses ($/Boe): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating |
|
$ |
20.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18.69 |
|
Production and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
9.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.85 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
16.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.86 |
|
Through September 24, 2009, HACIs efforts had been primarily limited to organizational
activities, activities relating to its initial public offering, activities relating to identifying
and evaluating prospective acquisition candidates, and activities relating to general corporate
matters; HACI had not generated any revenue, other than interest income earned on the proceeds of
its initial public offering.
For the purposes of managements discussion and analysis of results of operations of Resolute,
management has analyzed the operational results for the three months ended March 31, 2010, in
comparison to the three months ended March 31, 2009, of Predecessor Resolute, except where
indicated.
Comparison of Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 to Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
Revenue. Revenue from oil and gas activities increased to $41.1 million during 2010, from
$22.5 million during 2009. Total production decreased 8.2% during 2010 as compared to 2009, from
692,000 Boe to 636,000 Boe. In addition to natural production declines, the overall production
decrease was partially attributed to compression failure at the Western Gas Resources Hilight Plant
and the fact that the Company voluntarily shut-down a portion of its coalbed methane production in
Wyoming due to uneconomic product prices for natural gas in that area. Another contributing factor
was that for most of 2009 the Company curtailed its capital programs due to low product prices and
the Companys limited financial liquidity. Had those capital projects not been curtailed, they
arguable could have contributed production to help offset the normal production declines in the
Companys producing fields. Management estimates that production constraints at the Hilight plant
resulted in a reduction in production volumes of approximately 23 MBoe, or 255 Boe per day during
the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as compared to what the field was capable of producing if
unconstrained.
The production decrease was more than offset by an increase in average sales price, excluding
derivatives settlements, from $32.48 per Boe in 2009 to $64.72 per Boe in 2010.
Operating Expenses. Lease operating expenses include labor, field office rent, vehicle
expenses, supervision, transportation, minor maintenance, tools and supplies, workover expenses,
and other customary charges. Resolute and Predecessor Resolute assess lease operating expenses in
part by monitoring the expenses in relation to production volumes and the number of wells operated.
Lease operating expenses increased to $13.3 million during 2010, from $13.0 million during
2009. The $0.3 million, or 2%, increase, was attributable to minor increases in company labor,
equipment and maintenance costs, utilities and fuel, and workover expense, offset by minor
decreases in contract labor and compression, gathering and other costs.
Production and ad valorem taxes increased to $6.3 million during 2010, from $3.4 million
during 2009. The $2.9 million, or 85%, increase was primarily attributable to the 83% increase in
revenue. Production and ad valorem taxes were 15.3% of total revenue in 2010, compared to 14.9% of
total revenue in 2009. The increase in the 2010 rate results from higher estimated ad valorem
taxes in 2010 as compared to 2009.
- 24 -
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses increased to $10.7 million during
2010, as compared to $8.2 million during 2009. The $2.5 million, or 30.5%, increase is principally
due to an increase in the depletion, depreciation and amortization rate from $11.86 per Boe in 2009
to $16.86 per Boe in 2010, which reflects the higher carrying value of proved oil and gas
properties in 2010 as a result of the Resolute Transaction at September 25, 2009.
Pursuant to full cost accounting rules, Resolute and Predecessor Resolute performed a ceiling
test each quarter on its proved oil and gas assets. As a result of this limitation on capitalized
costs, Predecessor Resolute included a provision for impairment of oil and gas property costs in
2009 of $13.3 million. There was no provision for impairment of oil and gas property in 2010 for
Resolute.
General and administrative expenses include the costs of Resolute, HACI and Predecessor
Resolutes employees and executive officers, related benefits, office leases, professional fees and
other costs not directly associated with field operations. Resolute and Predecessor Resolute
monitor general and administrative expenses in relation to the amount of production and the number
of wells operated.
General and administrative expenses for Resolute and Predecessor Resolute increased to $2.7
million during 2010, as compared to $2.1 million during 2009. The $0.6 million, or 29%, increase in
general and administrative expenses principally resulted from a $1.0 million increase in
professional services and consulting fees and an increase of $0.3 million in personnel costs and a
$0.8 million decrease in stock based compensation. General and administrative expenses of $3.8
million related to HACI in 2009 were principally comprised of the write off of deferred acquisition
costs of $3.5 million.
Other Income (Expense). All oil and gas derivative instruments are accounted for under
mark-to-market accounting rules, which provide for the fair value of the contracts to be reflected
as either an asset or a liability on the balance sheet. The change in the fair value during an
accounting period is reflected in the income statement for that period. During 2010, the gain on
oil and gas derivatives was $0.2 million consisting of approximately $2.1 million of realized
losses on commodities derivatives and $2.3 million of unrealized gains on commodities derivatives.
During 2009, the gain on oil and gas derivatives was $9.9 million consisting of approximately $10.3
million of realized gains offset by an unrealized loss of $0.4 million.
Interest expense was $1.1 million during 2010, as compared to $6.2 million during 2009. The
$5.1 million, or 82.3%, decrease is attributable to a 74% reduction in average outstanding
borrowings and lower interest rates.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense). Income tax expense recognized during 2010 was $2.7 million, or
36.3% of income before income taxes, as compared to an income tax benefit of $1.1 million, or 34%
of loss before income taxes, for Resolute in 2009. The change in the effective rate reflects the
differing tax jurisdictions in which Resolute operates in following the Resolute Transaction.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Resolutes primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations and amounts
available under the revolving Credit Facility.
For the purposes of managements discussion and analysis of liquidity and capital resources,
management has analyzed the cash flows and capital resources for the three months ended March 31,
2010 for Resolute in comparison to the three months ended March 31, 2009 for Resolute and
Predecessor Resolute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute |
|
Predecessor Resolute |
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(in thousands) |
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
14,619 |
|
|
$ |
(631 |
) |
|
$ |
5,408 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(14,488 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(4,076 |
) |
Cash provided (used in) by financing activities |
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,032 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities was $14.6 million for the three months of 2010
compared to $5.4 million for the three months of 2009. Cash flows from operating activities in 2010
reflected a change from a net loss in 2009 to net income in 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities was $14.5 million for the
three months in 2010 compared
to $4.1 million in 2009. The primary investing activities for the three months of 2010 and 2009
were capital expenditures of $12.7 million and $4.1 million, respectively. The 2010 capital
expenditures were comprised of $5.9 million in leasehold costs as a result of the
- 25 -
acquisition of
undeveloped leasehold acreage in Williams County, North Dakota, $3.4 million in CO2
acquisition and $3.4 million in other capital expenditures. Capital spending in the first quarter
was consistent with the capital budget.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.8 million for the three months in 2010
compared to net cash used in financing activities of $3.0 million for the three months in 2009. The
primary financing activities in the first three months of 2010 were $5.8 million in net bank
borrowings and $4.0 million in deferred financing costs related to the credit agreement entered
into by the Company on March 30, 2010. Primary financing activities in the three months of 2009
were $3.0 million in net borrowings under the Credit Facility.
Resolute plans to reinvest a sufficient amount of its cash flow in its development operations
in order to maintain its production over the long term, and plans to use external financing sources
as well as cash flow from operations and cash reserves to increase its production.
Additionally, in March 2010, Resolute agreed to acquire a 47.5% working interest in
approximately 61,000 gross (42,000 net leasehold) acres in Williams County, North Dakota. This
undeveloped leasehold is located within the Bakken shale trend of the Williston Basin. Although
the Middle Bakken formation will be the primary objective, secondary objectives include the Three
Forks, Madison and Red River formations. Resolute expects to participate in drilling three
horizontal wells in this area during latter part of 2010.
If cash flow from operating activities does not meet expectations, Resolute may reduce its
expected level of capital expenditures and/or fund a portion of its capital expenditures using
borrowings under its Credit Facility, issuances of debt and equity securities or from other
sources, such as asset sales. There can be no assurance that needed capital will be available on
acceptable terms or at all. Resolutes ability to raise funds through the incurrence of additional
indebtedness could be limited by the covenants in its credit facility. If Resolute is unable to
obtain funds when needed or on acceptable terms, it may not be able to complete acquisitions that
may be favorable to it or finance the capital expenditures necessary to maintain production or
proved reserves.
If Resolute incurs significant indebtedness in the future, its ability to obtain additional
financing may be impaired, its ability to make changes in its business may become impaired due to
covenant restrictions, a significant portion of its cash flow will be used to make payments in
respect of principal and interest on the debt, rather than being available for operating or capital
expenditures, and thus put Resolute at a competitive disadvantage as compared to its competitors
that have less debt, and may limit its ability to pursue other business opportunities.
Resolute plans to continue its practice of hedging a significant portion of its production
through the use of various derivatives transactions. Resolutes existing derivatives transactions
do not quality as cash flow hedges, and the Company anticipates that future transactions will
receive similar accounting treatment. Hedge arrangements are generally settled within five days of
the end of the month. As is typical in the oil and gas industry, however, Resolute does not
generally receive the proceeds from the sale of its crude oil production until the 20th day of the
month following the month of production. As a result, when commodity prices increase above the
fixed price in the derivative contacts, Resolute will be required to pay the derivative
counterparty the difference between the fixed price in the derivative contract and the market price
before receiving the proceeds from the sale of the hedged production. If this occurs, Resolute may
use working capital borrowings to fund its operations.
Revolving Credit Facility
Resolutes credit facility is with a syndicate of banks led by Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (the Credit Facility) with Resolute as the borrower. The Credit Facility specifies a
maximum borrowing base as determined by the lenders. The determination of the borrowing base takes
into consideration the estimated value of Resolutes oil and gas properties in accordance with the
lenders customary practices for oil and gas loans. On March 30, 2010, the Company entered into an
amended and restated credit facility agreement. Under the terms of the restated agreement, the
borrowing base was increased from $240.0 million to $260.0 million and the maturity date was
extended to March 2014. At Resolutes option, the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility
accrues interest at either (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus a margin which varies from
2.25% to 3.0% or (b) the Alternative Base Rate defined as the greater of (i) the Administrative
Agents Prime Rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%, or (iii) an adjusted London
Interbank Offered Rate plus 1%, plus a margin which ranges from 1.25% to 2.0%. Each such margin is
based on the level of utilization under the borrowing base. As of March 31, 2010, the weighted
average interest rate on the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility was 3.17%.
The borrowing base is re-determined semi-annually, and the amount available for borrowing
could be increased or decreased as a result of such re-determinations. Under certain circumstances,
either Resolute or the lenders may request an interim re-determination. As of March 31, 2010,
outstanding borrowings were $115.4 million and unused availability under the borrowing base was
$136.1 million. The borrowing base availability has been reduced by $8.5 million in conjunction
with letters of credit issued to vendors at March 31, 2010. To the extent that the borrowing base,
as adjusted from time to time,
- 26 -
exceeds the outstanding balance, no repayments of principal are
required prior to maturity. The Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the
proved oil and gas assets of Aneth and RWI, and is guaranteed by its subsidiaries.
The Credit Facility includes terms and covenants that place limitations on certain types of
activities, the payment of dividends, and require satisfaction of certain financial tests. Resolute
was in compliance with all terms and covenants of the Credit Facility at March 31, 2010.
As of May 7, 2010, Resolute had borrowings of $130.3 million under the borrowing base,
resulting in an unused availability of $121.2 million.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Resolute does not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements other than operating
leases. Resolute has not guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities or entered into any
options on non-financial assets.
- 27 -
ITEM 3. QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Commodity Price Risk and Hedging Arrangements
Resolutes major market risk exposure is in the pricing applicable to oil and gas production.
Realized pricing on Resolutes unhedged volumes of production is primarily driven by the spot
market prices applicable to oil production and the prevailing price for gas. Pricing for oil
production has been volatile and unpredictable for several years, and Resolute expects this
volatility to continue in the future. The prices Resolute receives for unhedged production depends
on many factors outside of Resolutes control.
Resolute periodically hedges a portion of its oil and gas production through swaps, puts,
calls, collars and other such agreements. The purpose of the hedges is to provide a measure of
stability to Resolutes cash flows in an environment of volatile oil and gas prices and to manage
Resolutes exposure to commodity price risk.
Under the terms of its Credit Agreement the form of derivative instruments to be entered into
is at Resolutes discretion, not to exceed 85% of its anticipated production from proved developed
producing properties utilizing economic parameters specified in its credit agreements.
By removing the price volatility from a significant portion of Resolutes oil production,
Resolute has mitigated, but not eliminated, the potential effects of changing prices on the cash
flow from operations for those periods. While mitigating negative effects of falling commodity
prices, certain of these derivative contracts also limit the benefits Resolute would receive from
increases in commodity prices. It is Resolutes policy to enter into derivative contracts only with
counterparties that are major, creditworthy financial institutions deemed by management as
competent and competitive market makers. At March 31, 2010, all of Resolutes counterparties are
members of the Credit Facility bank syndicate.
As of March 31, 2010, Resolute had entered into certain commodity swap contracts. The
following table represents Resolutes commodity swaps with respect to its oil production through
2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (NYMEX HH) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Year |
|
Bbl per Day |
|
|
Hedge Price per Bbl |
|
|
MMBtu per Day |
|
|
Hedge Price per MMBtu |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
$ |
67.24 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
$ |
9.69 |
|
2011 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
$ |
68.26 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
$ |
9.32 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
$ |
68.26 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
$ |
7.42 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
60.47 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
$ |
7.40 |
|
Resolute also uses basis swaps in connection with gas swaps in order to fix the price
differential between the NYMEX Henry Hub price and the index price at which the gas production is
sold. The table below sets forth Resolutes outstanding basis swaps as of March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Price |
|
Year |
|
Index |
|
MMBtu per Day |
|
|
Differential per MMBtu |
|
2010 2013 |
|
Rocky Mountain NWPL |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
As of March 31, 2010, Resolute had entered into certain commodity collar contracts. The
following table represents Resolutes commodity collars with respect to its oil and production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Year |
|
Bbl per Day |
|
|
Hedge Price per Bbl |
|
2010 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
$ |
105.00-151.00 |
|
Interest Rate Risk
At March 31, 2010, Resolute has $115.4 million of outstanding debt. Interest is calculated
under the terms of the agreement based on a LIBOR spread. A 10% increase in LIBOR would result in
an estimated $0.1 million increase in annual interest expense. Resolute does not currently intend
to enter into any derivative arrangements to protect against fluctuations in interest rates
applicable to its outstanding indebtedness.
Credit Risk and Contingent Features in Derivative Instruments
Resolute is exposed to credit risk to the extent of nonperformance by the counterparties in
the derivative contracts discussed above. All counterparties are also lenders under Resolutes
Credit Facility. For these contracts, Resolute is not required to provide any credit support to
its counterparties other than cross collateralization with the properties securing the Credit
Facility. Resolutes derivative contracts are documented with industry standard contracts known as
a Schedule to the Master Agreement and International Swaps and Derivative Association, Inc. Master
Agreement (ISDA). Typical terms for
- 28 -
the ISDAs include credit support requirements, cross default provisions, termination events,
and set-off provisions. Resolute has set-off provisions with its lenders that, in the event of
counterparty default, allow Resolute to set-off amounts owed under the Credit Facility or other
general obligations against amounts owed for derivative contract liabilities.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of Nicholas J. Sutton, our Chief Executive Officer, and
Theodore Gazulis, our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2010. Based on the evaluation,
those officers have concluded that:
|
|
|
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. |
|
|
|
|
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. |
There has not been any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
- 29 -
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Legal Proceedings
Resolute is not a party to any other material pending legal or governmental proceedings, other
than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business. While the ultimate outcome and impact
of any proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty, Resolutes management believes that the
resolution of any of its pending proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its
financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Information about material risks related to Resolutes business, financial condition and
results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010, does not materially differ from
those set out in Part I, Item 1A of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, except as described below. These risks and those described below are not the only risks
facing the company.
Delaware
law and our amended and restated charter documents may impede or discourage a takeover that our stockholders may consider favorable.
Our amended and restated charter and bylaws have provisions that may deter, delay or prevent a
third party from acquiring us. These provisions include:
|
|
|
limitations on the ability of stockholders to amend our charter documents, including
stockholder supermajority voting requirements |
|
|
|
|
the inability of stockholders to act by written consent or to call special meetings. |
|
|
|
|
a classified board of directors with staggered three-year terms; |
|
|
|
|
the authority of our board of directors to issue, without stockholder approval, up to
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such terms as the board of directors may determine
and to issue additional shares of our common stock; and |
|
|
|
|
advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals and the nomination of
candidates for election as directors. |
These provisions could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in
control, discourage others from making tender offers for our shares, lower the market price of our
stock or impede the ability of our stockholders to change our management, even if such a change
would be beneficial to our stockholders.
Registration rights held by certain of our stockholders may have an adverse effect on the market
price of our common stock.
Under a Registration Rights Agreement entered into in connection with the Resolute
Transaction, holders of registrable securities have the right to demand registration under the
Securities Act of all or a portion of their registrable securities subject to amount and time
limitations. Holders of the registrable securities may demand four registrations. Additionally,
whenever (i) we propose to register any of our securities under the Securities Act and (ii) the
method we select would permit the registration of registrable securities, holder of registrable
securities have the right to request the inclusion of their registrable securities in such
registration. The resale of these shares in the public market upon exercise of the registration
rights described above could adversely affect the market price of our common stock or impact our
ability to raise additional equity capital. Parties to the Registration Rights Agreement have
right to request registration of (i) shares representing 24.6% of our outstanding common stock at
March 31, 2010, and (ii) an additional 20,800,000 shares purchasable on exercise of outstanding
warrants.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
- 30 -
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
10.1
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Right Agreement for Non-employee Directors |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(furnished herewith) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Capacity |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
May 7, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore Gazulis
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
|
May 7, 2010 |
- 31 -
Exhibit 10.1
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT AGREEMENT
(Employees)
This Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (this Agreement) between RESOLUTE ENERGY
CORPORATION (the Corporation) and [ ] (Participant) is dated effective
(the Date of Grant).
RECITALS
A. The Corporation has adopted the Resolute Energy Corporation 2009 Performance Incentive
Plan (the Plan);
B. The Plan provides for the granting of restricted stock awards to eligible persons as
determined by the Administrator; and
C. The Administrator has determined that Participant is a person eligible to receive a
restricted stock award under the Plan and has determined that it would be in the best interests of
the Corporation to grant the restricted stock award provided for herein.
AGREEMENT
1. Grant of Restricted Stock.
(a) Stock. Pursuant to the Plan and in consideration of employment services rendered
and to be rendered by Participant to the Corporation, Participant is
hereby awarded shares of
the Corporations common stock (the Common Stock), subject to the conditions of the Plan
and this Agreement (the Restricted Stock).
(b) Plan Incorporated. Participant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, and
agrees that, except as contemplated by Section 11 below, this award of Restricted Stock shall be
subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan, including future amendments
thereto, if any, pursuant to the terms thereof, which Plan is incorporated herein by reference as a
part of this Agreement. Except as defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the same meanings
ascribed to them under the Plan.
2. Vesting and Forfeiture.
(a) Vesting Schedule. Participant shall vest in his or her rights under the
Restricted Stock pursuant to the following schedule (each date upon which vesting occurs being
referred to herein as a Vesting Date):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Vested by |
|
|
|
|
Vested By the |
|
Performance |
|
|
Date |
|
Passage of Time |
|
Criteria |
|
Total Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Performance Criteria. The shares indicated in the table in Section 2(a) as
Vested By Performance Criteria (the Performance Vested Shares) shall vest on the
applicable Vesting Date if the average of the closing prices of the Corporations Common Stock on
the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or other principal stock exchange on which the Common
Stock is then listed for the twenty trading days ending on the Vesting Date (the Average Price)
has increased by %, compounded annually, over $
, the Average Price on
. If
the Performance Vesting Criteria shall not have been satisfied with respect to any shares of
Restricted Stock on any Vesting Date other than
, such Performance Vested Shares
shall not be forfeited, but shall be added to the Number of Shares Vested by Performance Criteria
and shall be subject to vesting at the next succeeding Vesting Date. If the Performance Criteria has not been satisfied at the final Vesting Date on
, any Performance Vested Shares, including those carried over from prior years,
shall be forfeited.
(c) Continuing
Employment. Except as provided below, vesting pursuant to the foregoing schedule shall occur on
a Vesting Date only if Participant continues to be employed by the Corporation from the Date of
Grant to such Vesting Date. If the Participant ceases to be employed by the Corporation at any
time prior to the final Vesting Date, for any reason or no reason, with or without cause, except as
provided below, all unvested Restricted Stock shall be forfeited immediately and automatically on
the date that Participants employment is terminated, without payment of any consideration to
Participant, and the Participant shall have no further rights with respect to such Restricted
Stock. If the Participant is employed by a subsidiary of the Corporation, any references in this
Agreement to employment with the Corporation shall instead be deemed to refer to employment with
such subsidiary.
(d) Acceleration of Vesting on Death or Disability.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, all unvested Restricted Stock shall vest effective immediately upon
(i) the death of Participant or (ii) the Administrators determination that Participant suffers from
a Disability (as defined). For
purposes of this Agreement, Disability means: (A) if the Participants employment with
the Corporation is subject to the terms of an employment agreement between the Participant and the
Corporation, which employment agreement includes a definition of Disability, the term
Disability as used in this Agreement shall have the meaning set forth in such employment
agreement during the period that such employment agreement remains in effect; and (B) in the
absence of such an agreement, the term Disability shall mean a physical or mental infirmity which
impairs the Participants ability to substantially perform his or her duties for a period of 180
consecutive days.
2
(e) Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock. If, when and to the extent determined by
the Administrator pursuant to Section 7.3 of the Plan, in the event that the Corporation undergoes
a Change in Control Event, any unvested Restricted Stock held by Participant will become fully
vested.
3. Issuance and Limits on Transferability. Shares of Restricted Stock shall not be
transferable until vested except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a
beneficiary designation, or as otherwise permitted by Section 5.7 of the Plan. No right or benefit
hereunder shall in any manner be liable for or subject to any debts, contracts, liabilities, or
torts of Participant. Any purported assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, sale, transfer or
other encumbrance of shares of unvested Restricted Stock that does not satisfy the requirements of
this Agreement and the Plan shall, prior to the lapse of the restrictions on such shares pursuant
to Section 2, be void and unenforceable against the Corporation. The Corporation shall not be
required to treat as owner of such Restricted Stock any transferee to whom such Restricted Stock
has been transferred in violation of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
4. Certificates. A certificate evidencing the Restricted Stock may be issued by the
Corporation in Participants name, or at the option of the Corporation, in the name of a nominee of
the Corporation, pursuant to which Participant shall have voting rights and shall be entitled to
receive all dividends until the Restricted Stock is otherwise forfeited pursuant to the provisions
of this Agreement. The certificate shall bear a legend evidencing the nature of the Restricted
Stock, and the Corporation may cause the certificate to be delivered upon issuance to the Secretary
of the Corporation or to such other depository as may be designated by the Corporation as a
depository for safekeeping until the Vesting Date or a forfeiture occurs pursuant to the terms of
the Plan and this Agreement. Upon the request of the Administrator, Participant shall deliver to
the Corporation a stock power, endorsed in blank, relating to the unvested Restricted Stock.
Additionally, in lieu of issuing a certificate evidencing the Restricted Stock, the Corporation may
issue such stock by establishing a restricted stock file with its transfer agent evidencing such
Restricted Stock prior to the lapsing of the applicable restriction. Upon a Vesting Date, the
Corporation shall cause a certificate or certificates to be issued without legend in the name of
Participant for the vested Restricted Stock. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this
Agreement, the issuance or delivery of any shares of Restricted Stock (whether subject to
restrictions or unrestricted) may be postponed for such period as may be required to comply with
applicable requirements of any national securities exchange or any requirements under any law or
regulation applicable to the issuance or delivery of such shares. The Corporation shall not be
obligated to issue or deliver any shares of Restricted Stock if the issuance or delivery thereof
shall constitute a violation of any provision of any law or of any regulation of any governmental
authority or any national securities exchange.
5. Status of Stock. Participant agrees that the Restricted Stock will not be sold or
otherwise disposed of in any manner that would constitute a violation of any applicable federal or
state securities laws. Participant also agrees (i) to the extent the shares are certificated, that
the certificates representing the Restricted Stock may bear such legend or legends as the
Corporation deems appropriate in order to assure compliance with applicable securities laws, (ii)
that the Corporation may refuse to register the transfer of the Restricted Stock on the stock
transfer records of the Corporation if such proposed transfer would, in the opinion of counsel
satisfactory to the Corporation, constitute a violation of any applicable securities law and (iii)
that the
3
Corporation may give related instructions to its transfer agent, if any, to stop
registration of the transfer of the Restricted Stock.
6. Withholding. In order to comply with all applicable federal or state income tax laws or
regulations, the Corporation may take such action as it deems appropriate to ensure that all
applicable federal or state payroll, withholding, income or other taxes, which are the sole and
absolute responsibility of Participant, are withheld or collected from Participant. Upon any
exercise, vesting, or payment of any award, the Corporation shall have the right at its option to
require the Participant (or the Participants personal representative or beneficiary, as the case
may be) to pay or provide for payment of at least the minimum amount of any taxes which the
Corporation may be required to withhold with respect to such award event or payment. In any case
where a tax is required to be withheld in connection with the delivery of shares of Common Stock
under this Plan, the Administrator may in its sole discretion grant (either at the time of the
award or thereafter) to the Participant the right to elect, pursuant to such rules and subject to
such conditions as the Administrator may establish, to satisfy Participants federal and state tax
withholding obligations arising from the receipt of, or the lapse of restrictions relating to, the
Restricted Stock, by (i) delivering cash, check (bank check, certified check or personal check) or
money order payable to the Corporation, (ii) having the Corporation withhold a portion of the
Restricted Stock otherwise to be delivered having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of such
taxes, (iii) delivering to the Corporation shares of Common Stock already owned by Participant
having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of such tax withholding, or (iv) allowing the
Corporation to deduct from any amount otherwise payable in cash to the Participant the amount of
such tax withholding. The delivery of any shares under the preceding subsection (iii) must have
been owned by Participant for no less than six months prior to the date delivered to the
Corporation if such shares were acquired upon the exercise of an option or upon the vesting of
restricted stock units or other restricted stock. The Corporation will not deliver any fractional
shares of Common Stock but will pay, in lieu thereof, the Fair Market Value of such fractional
shares of Common Stock. Participants election must be made on or before the date that the amount
of tax to be withheld is determined, or else the Corporation shall be entitled to elect the method
in which Participants federal and state withholding obligations shall be satisfied.
7. Tax Election. The Corporation has advised Participant to seek Participants own tax and
financial advice with regard to the federal and state tax considerations resulting from
Participants receipt of Restricted Stock pursuant to this Agreement. Participant is making
Participants own determination as to the advisability of making a Section 83(b) election with
respect to the Restricted Stock. Participant understands that the Corporation will report to
appropriate taxing authorities the payment to Participant of compensation income either (i) upon
the vesting of the Restricted Stock or (ii) if Participant makes a timely Section 83(b) election,
as of the Date of Grant. Participant understands that he or she is solely responsible for the
payment of all federal and state taxes resulting from this grant or vesting of Restricted Stock.
With respect to tax withholding amounts, the Corporation has all of the
rights specified in Section 6 of this Agreement and has no obligations to Participant except as
expressly stated in Section 6 of this Agreement.
8. Authority of Administrator. In making any decisions or taking any actions with respect
to the matters covered by this Agreement, the Administrator shall have all of the authority and
4
discretion, and shall be subject to all of the protections, provided for in the Plan. All
decisions and actions by the Administrator with respect to this Agreement, including the
satisfaction of Performance Criteria, shall be made in the Administrators discretion and shall be
final and binding on the Participant.
9. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall bind Participant and the Corporation and their
beneficiaries, survivors, executors, administrators and transferees.
10. No Right to Continued Employment. The Participant acknowledges and agrees that,
notwithstanding the fact that the vesting of the Restricted Stock is contingent upon his or her
continued employment by the Corporation, this Agreement does not constitute an express or implied
promise of continued employment or confer upon the Participant any rights with respect to continued
employment by the Corporation.
11. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in
accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without regard to conflict of law principles
thereunder.
12. Conflicts and Interpretation. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and
the Plan, this Agreement shall control. In the event of any ambiguity in this Agreement, or any
matters as to which this Agreement is silent, the Plan shall govern including, without limitation,
the provisions thereof pursuant to which the Administrator has the power, among others, to (i)
interpret the Plan, (ii) prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan
and (iii) make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the
Plan.
13. Amendment. The Corporation may modify, amend or waive the terms of the Restricted
Stock award, prospectively or retroactively, but no such modification, amendment or waiver shall
impair the rights of Participant without his or her consent, except as required by applicable law,
NYSE or stock exchange rules, tax rules or accounting rules. Prior to the effectiveness of any
modification, amendment or waiver required by tax or accounting rules, the Corporation will provide
notice to Participant and the opportunity for Participant to consult with the Corporation regarding
such modification, amendment or waiver. The waiver by either party of compliance with any
provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any other provision of
this Agreement, or of any subsequent breach by such party of a provision of this Agreement.
14. Participants Acknowledgments. The Participant acknowledges that he or she has read
this Agreement, has received and read the Plan and the Prospectus captioned Resolute Energy
Corporation 2009 Performance Incentive Plan (Information), and understands the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, the Plan and the Information.
15. Defined Terms. All terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings set forth therefor in the Plan.
[Signature Page Follows.]
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Restricted Stock Grant Agreement
(Employees) as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
PARTICIPANT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
[NAME] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.2
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHT GRANT AGREEMENT
(Non-Employee Directors)
This Stock Appreciation Right Grant Agreement (this Agreement) between RESOLUTE
ENERGY CORPORATION (the Corporation) and [ ] (Participant) is dated
effective [ ] (the Date of Grant).
RECITALS
A. The Corporation has adopted the Resolute Energy Corporation 2009 Performance Incentive Plan
(the Plan);
B. The Plan provides for the granting of stock appreciation rights to eligible persons as
determined by the Administrator;
C. On , the Board determined that directors of the Corporation should receive
compensation for their services from through , subject to a
determination from legal, tax and compensation advisors regarding the form of such compensation;
D. Participant
has been a director of the Corporation from through
, is currently a director of the Corporation and is a person eligible to receive an
award under the Plan; and
E. The Administrator has determined that Participant should receive compensation under the
Plan in respect of Participants service from through in the form of stock
appreciation rights and has determined that it is in the best interests of the Corporation to grant
the stock appreciation right award provided for herein.
AGREEMENT
1. Grant of Stock Appreciation Rights.
(a) Stock Appreciation Rights. Pursuant to the Plan, and in consideration of
non-employee director services rendered by Participant to the Corporation, Participant is hereby
awarded stock appreciation rights covering
shares of the Corporations common stock (the
Common Stock), subject to the conditions of the Plan and this Agreement (the Stock
Appreciation Rights). A Stock Appreciation Right is a right to receive an amount in cash
equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date on
which a Stock Appreciation Right is exercised over its Base Price (such amount, the
Spread). The base price for the Stock Appreciation Rights granted hereby is $[ ] per
share of Common Stock, which is the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the Date of
Grant (the Base Price).
(b) Definition of Fair Market Value. For purposes of this Agreement, Fair Market
Value shall mean the last sale price for a share of Common Stock as quoted on the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) or other principal stock exchange on which the Common Stock is
then listed for the date in question or, if no sales of Common Stock were reported by the NYSE or
other such exchange on that date, the last price for a share of Common Stock as furnished by the
NYSE or other such exchange for the next preceding day on which sales of Common Stock were reported
by the NYSE. If the Common Stock is no longer listed or is no longer actively traded on the NYSE
or listed on a principal stock exchange as of the applicable date, the Fair Market Value of the
Common Stock shall be the value as reasonably determined by the Administrator for purposes of the
award in the circumstances.
(c) Plan Incorporated. Participant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, and
agrees that, except as contemplated by Section 13 below, this award of Stock Appreciation
Rights shall be subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan, including future
amendments thereto, if any, pursuant to the terms thereof, which Plan is incorporated herein by
reference as a part of this Agreement.
2. Vesting and Forfeiture.
(a) Vesting Schedule. The Stock Appreciation Rights shall vest pursuant to the
schedule below (each date below upon which vesting occurs pursuant to this Section 2 being
referred to herein as a Vesting Date). The Stock Appreciation Rights that have vested in
accordance with this Section 2 are referred to herein in as Vested SARs.
|
|
|
Vesting Date
|
|
Number of
Stock Appreciation
Rights Vested |
|
|
|
(b) Continuing Provision of Services. Vesting pursuant to the foregoing schedule
shall occur on a Vesting Date only if Participant continues to provide services to the Corporation
from the Date of Grant to such Vesting Date. If Participant ceases to provide services to the
Corporation at any time prior to the final Vesting Date, except as provided below, all unvested
Stock Appreciation Rights shall be forfeited immediately on the date that Participants service is
terminated, and Participant shall have no further rights with respect to such unvested Stock
Appreciation Rights.
(c) Acceleration of Vesting on Death or Disability. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
all unvested Stock Appreciation Rights shall vest effective immediately upon the death of
Participant or upon the Administrators determination that Participant has suffered from a
Disability (as defined) and has been removed from or terminated service to the Corporation. For
purposes of this Agreement, Disability means a physical or mental infirmity which impairs
Participants ability to substantially perform his or her duties as a non-employee director.
(d) Accelerated Vesting of Stock Appreciation Right. If, when and to the extent
determined by the Administrator pursuant to Section 7.3 of the Plan, in the event that the
2
Corporation undergoes a Change in Control Event, any unvested Stock Appreciation Rights held
by Participant will become fully vested.
3. Exercise.
(a) Deemed Exercise. Upon vesting of each unvested Stock Appreciation Right pursuant
to Section 2 hereof, each Vested SAR shall be deemed exercised as of the Vesting Date.
(b) Payment. On the deemed exercise of each Vested SAR, the Corporation shall deliver
to Participant an amount equivalent to the Spread for each Vested SAR in cash, less any amounts
withheld pursuant to Section 5 hereof.
4. Issuance and Limits on Transferability. The Stock Appreciation Rights shall not be
transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a beneficiary
designation, or as otherwise permitted by Section 5.7 of the Plan. No right or benefit hereunder
shall in any manner be liable for or subject to any debts, contracts, liabilities, or torts of
Participant. Any purported assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, sale, transfer or other
encumbrance of any Stock Appreciation Rights that does not satisfy the requirements of this
Agreement and the Plan shall be void and unenforceable against the Corporation. The Corporation
shall not be required to treat as owner of such Stock Appreciation Right any transferee to whom
such Stock Appreciation Right has been transferred in violation of any of the provisions of this
Agreement.
5. Withholding. In order to comply with all applicable federal or state income tax laws or
regulations, the Corporation may take such action as it deems appropriate to ensure that all
applicable federal or state payroll, withholding, income or other taxes, which are the sole and
absolute responsibility of Participant, are withheld or collected from Participant. In accordance
with the terms of the Plan, and such rules as may be adopted by the Administrator under the Plan,
the Corporation shall have the right to withhold an amount sufficient to satisfy Participants
federal and state tax withholding obligations arising from the exercise of the Stock Appreciation
Rights.
6. Tax Matters. The Corporation has advised Participant to seek Participants own tax and
financial advice with regard to the federal and state tax considerations resulting from
Participants receipt of the Stock Appreciation Rights pursuant to this Agreement. With respect to
applicable tax withholding amounts, if any, the Corporation has all of the rights specified in
Section 5 of this Agreement and has no obligations to Participant except as expressly stated in
Section 5 of this Agreement.
7. Rights as a Stockholder. Neither Participant nor any person claiming under or through
Participant shall be, or have any of the rights or privileges of, a stockholder of the Corporation
with respect to the Stock Appreciation Rights.
8. Termination of Stock Appreciation Rights. Each Stock Appreciation Right and all rights
and privileges thereunder shall terminate and may no longer be exercised upon the earlier to occur
of (i) the forfeiture of the Stock Appreciation Right pursuant to Section 2(b) hereof or
(ii) the deemed exercise of such Stock Appreciation Right pursuant to Section 3 hereof.
3
9. Authority of Administrator. In making any decisions or taking any actions with respect
to the matters covered by this Agreement, the Administrator shall have all of the authority and
discretion, and shall be subject to all of the protections, provided for in the Plan. All
decisions and actions by the Administrator with respect to this Agreement, including the
determination of Fair Market Value, shall be made in the Administrators discretion and shall be
final and binding on the Participant.
10. Notice. Any notice to be given to the Corporation under the terms of this Agreement
shall be addressed to the Corporation, in care of the Secretary, at 1675 Broadway, Suite 1950,
Denver, Colorado 80202, or at such other address as the Corporation may designate in writing to
Participant. Any notice to be given to Participant shall be addressed to Participant at the
address set forth beneath his signature below, or at any other address as Participant may designate
in writing to the Corporation.
11. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall bind Participant and the Corporation and their
beneficiaries, survivors, executors, administrators and transferees.
12. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in
accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without regard to conflict of law principles
thereunder.
13. Conflicts and Interpretation. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and
the Plan, this Agreement shall control. In the event of any ambiguity in this Agreement, or any
matters as to which this Agreement is silent, the Plan shall govern including, without limitation,
the provisions thereof pursuant to which the Administrator has the power, among others, to (i)
interpret the Plan, (ii) prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan
and (iii) make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the
Plan.
14. Amendment. The Corporation may modify, amend or waive the terms of the Stock
Appreciation Right award, prospectively or retroactively, but no such modification, amendment or
waiver shall impair the rights of Participant without his or her consent, except as required by
applicable law, NYSE or stock exchange rules, tax rules or accounting rules. Prior to the
effectiveness of any modification, amendment or waiver required by tax or accounting rules, the
Corporation will provide notice to Participant and the opportunity for Participant to consult with
the Corporation regarding such modification, amendment or waiver. The waiver by either party of
compliance with any provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of
any other provision of this Agreement, or of any subsequent breach by such party of a provision of
this Agreement.
15. Adjustments. If the outstanding Common Stock is increased, decreased, changed into, or
exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or securities through merger, consolidation,
combination, exchange of shares, other reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock
dividend, stock split or reverse stock split and if the Stock Appreciation Rights granted hereunder
do not otherwise vest as a result thereof, an appropriate and proportionate adjustment shall be
made in the number and kind of Stock Appreciation Rights to which Participant shall be entitled
under this Agreement, all in accordance with Section 7 of the Plan.
4
16. Defined Terms. All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meanings set forth therefor in the Plan.
[Signature Page Follows.]
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Stock Appreciation Right Grant Agreement as
of the date first written above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
PARTICIPANT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
[NAME] |
|
|
[ADDRESS] |
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Nicholas J. Sutton, Chief Executive Officer of Resolute Energy Corporation, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Resolute Energy Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; |
|
|
c) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
Date: May 7, 2010
|
|
|
/s/ Nicholas J. Sutton
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Theodore Gazulis, Chief Financial Officer of Resolute Energy Corporation, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Resolute Energy Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; |
|
|
c) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
Date: May 7, 2010
|
|
|
/s/ Theodore Gazulis
Theodore Gazulis
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Resolute Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|
1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
/s/ Nicholas J. Sutton
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
May 7, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Theodore Gazulis
Theodore Gazulis
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
May 7, 2010 |
|
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by
the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:
oPreliminary Proxy Statement
oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a6(e)(2))
xDefinitive Proxy Statement
oDefinitive Additional Materials
oSoliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x No fee required.
o Fee computed on the table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a6(i)(4) and 011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 011 (Set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 011(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1675 Broadway, Suite 1950
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone:
(303) 534-4600
May 10,
2010
Dear Resolute Energy Corporation Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to the Resolute Energy Corporation
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Thursday,
June 10, 2010, at 2:00 p.m., Mountain Time. The
meeting will be held at the offices of
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, 1550 Seventeenth
Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202.
At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to elect three
Class I directors to our Board of Directors and to ratify
the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the 2010 fiscal year.
We have enclosed a copy of our Annual Report for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 with this Notice of Annual Meeting
of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. Please read the enclosed
information carefully before completing and returning the
enclosed proxy card.
Please join us at the meeting. Whether or not you plan to
attend, it is important that you vote your proxy promptly in
accordance with the instructions on the enclosed proxy card. If
you do attend the meeting, you may withdraw your proxy should
you wish to vote in person.
Sincerely,
Nicholas J. Sutton
Chief Executive Officer and Director
1675 Broadway, Suite 1950
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone:
(303) 534-4600
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of Resolute Energy Corporation:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of Resolute Energy Corporation will be held at the offices of
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, 1550 Seventeenth Street,
Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202, at 2:00 p.m.,
Mountain Time, on June 10, 2010, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
to elect William H. Cunningham, James E. Duffy and William J.
Quinn to our Board of Directors as Class I directors;
|
|
|
2.
|
to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2010; and
|
|
|
3.
|
to transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
|
We know of no other matters to come before the Annual Meeting.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on Monday,
April 19, 2010, are entitled to notice of and to vote at
the annual meeting or at any adjournments or postponements
thereof.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be Held on
June 10, 2010:
The proxy statement, proxy card and the annual report to
shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
are available at www.proxydocs.com/ren.
Regardless of the number of shares of common stock you hold,
as a stockholder your role is very important and the Board of
Directors strongly encourages you to exercise your right to
vote.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
James M. Piccone
President, General Counsel and Secretary
May 10, 2010
Denver, Colorado
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
ii
1675
Broadway, Suite 1950
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone:
(303) 534-4600
PROXY
STATEMENT
GENERAL
INFORMATION
These proxy materials are being furnished to you by the Board of
Directors (the Board) of Resolute Energy
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (we,
our, us, Resolute or the
Company), in connection with its solicitation of
proxies for Resolutes Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held on June 10, 2010, at 2:00 p.m., Mountain Time, at
the offices of Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, 1550
Seventeenth Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202, and
at any adjournments or postponements thereof (the Annual
Meeting). In addition to solicitation by mail, certain of
our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies by
telephone, personal contact, or other means of communication.
They will not receive any additional compensation for these
activities. Also, brokers, banks and other persons holding
common stock on behalf of beneficial owners will be requested to
solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners. We
will bear all costs incurred in connection with the preparation,
assembly and mailing of the proxy materials and the solicitation
of proxies and will reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees,
fiduciaries and custodians for reasonable expenses incurred by
them in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of our
common stock.
This proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card are expected to
be first sent to our stockholders on or about May 10, 2010.
The proxy materials are also available at
www.proxydocs.com/ren.
The close of business on Monday, April 19, 2010, has been
fixed as the record date for the determination of stockholders
entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
On that date, our outstanding voting securities consisted of
53,160,375 shares of common stock. Each share of common
stock is entitled to one vote. Votes may not be cumulated.
Most stockholders hold their shares through a broker or other
nominee rather than directly in their own name. If your shares
are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent,
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you
are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of
record, and we are sending these proxy materials directly to
you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant
your voting proxy directly to the named proxy holder or to vote
in person at the meeting. We have enclosed a proxy card for you
to use that contains voting instructions and allows you to vote
via the phone, mail or online.
If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another
nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held
in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to
you by such brokerage account or nominee, together with a voting
instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you have the
1
right to direct your broker, trustee or nominee how to vote and
are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Since a
beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not
vote these shares in person at the meeting unless you obtain a
legal proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that
holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at
the meeting. Your broker, trustee or nominee has enclosed or
provided voting instructions for you to use in directing the
broker, trustee or nominee how to vote your shares.
All stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed
proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. If you are not a
stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker or
nominee (i.e., in street name), you should provide proof of
beneficial ownership on the record date, such as your most
recent account statement prior to April 19, 2010, a copy of
the voting instruction card provided by your broker, trustee or
nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership.
Shares held in your name as the stockholder of record may be
voted in person at the Annual Meeting. Shares held beneficially
in street name may be voted in person only if you obtain a legal
proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares
giving you the right to vote the shares. Even if you plan to
attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit
your proxy or voting instructions prior to the meeting as
described below so that your vote will be counted if you later
decide not to attend the meeting.
Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or
beneficially in street name, you may direct how your shares are
voted without attending the Annual Meeting. If you are a
stockholder of record, you may vote by submitting a proxy. If
you hold shares beneficially in street name, you may vote by
submitting voting instructions to your broker, trustee or
nominee. For directions on how to vote, please refer to the
instructions included on your proxy card or, for shares held
beneficially in street name, the voting instruction card
provided by your broker, trustee or nominee.
Holders of a majority of our outstanding common stock entitled
to vote must be present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual
Meeting for a quorum to exist. If the shares present in person
or by proxy at the Annual Meeting do not constitute a quorum,
the Annual Meeting may be adjourned to a subsequent time. Shares
that are voted FOR, AGAINST,
ABSTAIN, or, with respect to the election of
directors, WITHHOLD, will be treated as being
present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a
quorum. Accordingly, if you have returned a valid proxy or
attend the Annual Meeting in person, your shares will be counted
for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum, even
if you wish to abstain from voting on some or all matters at the
Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes will also be
counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a
quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a bank, broker or other
person holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a
particular proposal because that holder does not have
discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not
received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.
You may vote FOR or WITHHOLD authority
to vote on Proposal One, relating to the election of
William H. Cunningham, James E. Duffy and William J. Quinn as
Class I directors to the Board. Members of the Board are
elected by a plurality of votes cast. This means that the three
nominees who receive the largest number of FOR votes
cast will be elected. Neither broker non-votes nor
WITHHOLD votes cast with respect to any nominee will
affect the election of that nominee.
You may vote FOR, AGAINST or
ABSTAIN on Proposal Two, relating to the
ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm. To be approved, that proposal must receive
2
the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting shares that are
present, in person or by proxy, at the meeting and entitled to
vote on the proposal. An abstention will have the affect of a
vote against the proposal. A broker non-vote will not have any
effect on the outcome of the vote on the proposal.
The Board recommends that you vote as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR Proposal One, relating to the election of
William H. Cunningham, James E. Duffy and William J. Quinn to
our Board as Class I directors; and
|
|
|
|
FOR Proposal Two, relating to the ratification
of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.
|
Any proxy as to which no instructions are given will be voted in
accordance with the foregoing recommendations; however, your
broker, bank or other holder of record does not have
discretionary voting authority to vote on the election of
directors without instructions from you, in which case a broker
non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted for the
election of directors. If you are a beneficial owner whose
shares are held of record by a broker, your broker does have
discretionary voting authority under the new rules to vote your
shares on the routine matter of ratification of KPMG LLP, even
if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you.
Accordingly, in the election of directors, which requires a
plurality of votes, broker non-votes will have no effect, and in
the proposal to ratify the appointment of our independent
registered public accounting firm, broker non-votes will have no
effect.
The proposals set forth in this proxy statement constitute the
only business that the Board intends to present or is informed
that others will present at the meeting. The proxy does,
however, confer discretionary authority upon the persons named
therein (the Proxy Agents), or their substitutes, to
vote on any other business that may properly come before the
meeting. If the Annual Meeting is adjourned, the Proxy Agents
can vote your shares on the new meeting date as well, unless you
have revoked your proxy.
You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to its use by
(i) delivering a written notice of revocation to our
Secretary, (ii) filing a duly executed proxy bearing a
later date with us or (iii) attending the Annual Meeting
and voting in person.
3
PROPOSAL ONEELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Our certificate of incorporation provides that members of the
Board are to be divided into three classes. The Board currently
consists of three Class I directors (William H. Cunningham,
James E. Duffy and William J. Quinn), three Class II
directors (James M. Piccone, Richard L. Covington and Robert M.
Swartz) and three Class III directors (Nicholas J. Sutton,
Kenneth A. Hersh and Thomas O. Hicks, Jr.). Our certificate
of incorporation provides that a director will generally serve
for a term that expires at the annual stockholders meeting
three years after the date of his or her election. The term of
the current Class I directors will expire at the Annual
Meeting. Our certificate of incorporation and applicable rules
of the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE)
contemplate that the number of directors in each class will be
approximately equal.
The Board has nominated Dr. Cunningham, Mr. Duffy and
Mr. Quinn to stand for election at the Annual Meeting and
to serve until the 2013 annual meeting or until their successors
are duly elected and qualified. Directors whose terms of office
will not expire at the Annual Meeting will continue in office
for the remainder of their respective terms. Under our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws, the number of directors
on the Board is determined by a resolution of the Board.
The Board has no reason to believe that Dr. Cunningham,
Mr. Duffy or Mr. Quinn will be unable to serve if
elected and, to the knowledge of the Board, each nominee intends
to serve the entire term for which election is sought. Only the
nominees, or substitute nominees designated by the Board, will
be eligible to stand for election as directors at the Annual
Meeting. If any nominee becomes unable to serve as a director
before the Annual Meeting, the Proxy Agents have the
discretionary authority to vote proxies held by them for
substitute nominees designated by the Board.
The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of William H.
Cunningham, James E. Duffy and William J. Quinn to the
Board.
The following table sets forth certain information as of
April 20, 2010, regarding the composition of the Board,
including the term of each director.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Term to
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Since
|
|
|
Expire
|
|
|
Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Cunningham
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
James E. Duffy
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
William J. Quinn
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard L. Covington
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
James M. Piccone
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
President, General Counsel, Secretary
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Swartz
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth A. Hersh
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Thomas O. Hicks, Jr.
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
4
William H. Cunningham was elected to the
Companys Board of Directors in September 2009.
Dr. Cunningham has been a member of the Audit Committee
since September 25, 2009, and between September 25,
2009 and December 15, 2009 was also a member of the
Compensation and Corporate Governance/Nominating Committees.
Dr. Cunningham was a director of Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc. from October 2007 through September 2009.
Since 1979, Dr. Cunningham has served as a professor of
marketing at the University of Texas at Austin and he has held
the James L. Bayless Chair for Free Enterprise at the University
of Texas at Austin since 1985. From 1983 to 1985 he was Dean of
the College of Business Administration and Graduate School of
Business of the University of Texas at Austin, from 1985 to 1992
he served as the President of the University of Texas at Austin,
and from 1992 to 2000 he served as the Chancellor (Chief
Executive Officer) of the University of Texas System.
Dr. Cunningham currently serves on the Board of Directors
of Lincoln National Corporation, a New York Stock Exchange
listed holding company for insurance, investment management,
broadcasting and sports programming businesses; Southwest
Airlines, an airline listed on the New York Stock Exchange; and
Lin Television, a New York Stock Exchange listed company that
owns a number of television stations. Dr. Cunningham
currently serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of John
Hancock Mutual Funds. Dr. Cunningham received a Bachelor of
Business Administration degree in 1966, a Master of Business
Administration degree in 1967 and a Ph.D. in 1971, each from
Michigan State University. Dr. Cunningham was president and
chief executive officer of IBT Technologies, a privately held
e-learning
company, from December 2000 through December 2001. IBT
Technologies filed for bankruptcy in December 2001 and has been
liquidated. In determining Dr. Cunninghams
qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors, the Board of
Directors has considered, among other things, his academic
experience in corporate governance matters in law schools and
graduate business programs, his service on more than 20
corporate boards, including in many instances as chairman of the
audit committee of public companies, and his experience and
expertise in marketing and management.
James E. Duffy was elected to the Companys
Board of Directors in September 2009. Mr. Duffy has been a
member of the Compensation and Audit Committees since
September 25, 2009, and between September 25, 2009 and
December 15, 2009, was also a member of the Corporate
Governance/Nominating Committee. He is a co-founder and, since
2003, Chairman of StreamWorks Products Group, Inc., a private
consumer products development company that manufactures products
for the sport fishing, industrial safety, specialty tool and
outdoor recreation industries. From 1990 to 2001, he served as
Chief Financial Officer and Director of HS Resources, Inc. until
its sale to Kerr-McGee Corporation. Prior to that time, he
served as Chief Financial Officer and Director of a division of
Tidewater, Inc. He was also a general partner in a boutique
investment banking business specializing in the oil and gas
business, and began his career with Arthur Young & Co
in San Francisco. He is a certified public accountant. In
determining Mr. Duffys qualifications to serve on our
Board of Directors, the Board of Directors has considered, among
other things, his experience and expertise in oil and gas
finance, accounting and banking, as well as his position as
chief financial officer of two public oil and gas companies and
his service as an audit manager for a major accounting firm with
engagement responsibility for public and private entities.
William J. Quinn was elected to the Companys
Board of Directors in September 2009. Mr. Quinn has been a
member of the Compensation Committee since September 25,
2009, and between September 25, 2009 and December 15,
2009, was also a member of the Corporate Governance/Nominating
Committee. He is the Executive Vice President of NGP Energy
Capital Management and is a managing partner of the Natural Gas
Partners private equity funds, having served in those or similar
capacities since 1998. He has been a member of the board of
managers of Resolute Holdings, LLC (Resolute
Holdings) since its founding in 2004. He currently serves
on the investment committee of NGP Capital Resources Company,
and is a director of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P., and of
its general partner, Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC. He also
serves as a member of the board of numerous private energy
companies. In determining Mr. Quinns qualifications
to serve on our Board of Directors, the Board of Directors has
considered, among other things, his extensive experience and
expertise in finance and in the energy industry.
5
Nicholas J. Sutton is the Chief Executive Officer
and has been a director of the Company since the Companys
formation in July 2009. Mr. Sutton has been the Chief
Executive Officer and a member of the board of managers of
Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC and related companies
(Predecessor Resolute) and of Resolute Holdings
since their founding in 2004. Mr. Sutton was a co-founder
and the Chief Executive Officer of HS Resources, Inc., a New
York Stock Exchange listed company, from 1978 until the
companys acquisition by Kerr-McGee Corporation in late
2001. From 2002 until the formation of Resolute Holdings in
2004, Mr. Sutton was a director of Kerr-McGee Corporation.
Currently, Mr. Sutton is a director of Tidewater, Inc., the
owner and operator of the worlds largest fleet of vessels
serving the global offshore oil industry, and a member of the
Board of the St. Francis Memorial Hospital Foundation. He also
is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers and of the
American Association of Petroleum Geologists. In determining
Mr. Suttons qualifications to serve on our Board of
Directors, the Board of Directors has considered, among other
things, his experience and expertise in the oil and gas
industry, his track record in growing public oil and gas
companies, including managing acquisition programs, as well as
his role in the founding of Resolute Holdings and the Resolute
Transaction (as defined herein). In addition, Mr. Sutton
has degrees in engineering and law, and has attended the Harvard
Owner/President Management program, giving him expertise in all
of the areas of importance to the Company.
James M. Piccone is the President, General Counsel
and Secretary and has been a director of the Company since the
Companys formation in July 2009. Mr. Piccone has been
the President, General Counsel, Secretary and a member of the
board of managers of Predecessor Resolute and of Resolute
Holdings since their formation in 2004. From January 2002 until
January 2004, Mr. Piccone was Senior Vice President and
General Counsel for Aspect Energy, LLC, a private oil and gas
company. Mr. Piccone also served as a contract attorney for
Aspect Energy from October 2001 until January 2002.
Mr. Piccone served as Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel
and Secretary of HS Resources, Inc. from May 1995 until the
acquisition of HS Resources by
Kerr-McGee
Corporation in August 2001. Mr. Piccone is admitted to the
practice of law in Colorado and is a member of local and
national bar associations. He is a member of the American
Association of Corporate Counsel. In determining
Mr. Piccones qualifications to serve on our Board of
Directors, the Board of Directors has considered, among other
things, his management and legal expertise, his knowledge of the
oil and gas industry and the role he played in the success of HS
Resources and Resolute Holdings, including his role in the
Resolute Transaction.
Richard L. Covington was elected to the
Companys Board of Directors in September 2009.
Mr. Covington has been a member of the Compensation and
Corporate Governance/Nominating Committees since
September 25, 2009. He is a managing director of the
Natural Gas Partners private equity funds. He has been a member
of the board of managers of Resolute Holdings since its founding
in 2004. Mr. Covington joined Natural Gas Partners
(NGP) in 1997. Prior to joining NGP,
Mr. Covington was a senior shareholder at the law firm of
Thompson & Knight, LLP, in Dallas, Texas.
Mr. Covington serves on the investment committee of NGP
Capital Resources Company and as a director of numerous private
energy companies. In determining Mr. Covingtons
qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors, the Board of
Directors has considered, among other things, his experience and
expertise in the legal and finance aspects of the oil and gas
industry and his role as a key advisor to Predecessor Resolute
from the founding of Resolute Holdings to the present.
Kenneth A. Hersh was elected to the Companys
Board of Directors in September 2009. Mr. Hersh has been a
member of the Compensation and Corporate Governance/Nominating
Committees since September 25, 2009. He is the Chief
Executive Officer of NGP Energy Capital Management, L.L.C. and
is a managing partner of the Natural Gas Partners private equity
funds and has served in those or similar capacities since 1989.
He has been a member of the board of managers of Resolute
Holdings since its founding in 2004. Prior to joining Natural
Gas Partners, L.P. in 1989, he was a member of the energy group
in the investment banking division of Morgan Stanley &
Co. He currently serves on the investment committee and as a
director of NGP Capital Resources Company, serves as a director
of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, the general partner of Eagle
Rock Energy Partners, L.P., and as a director of numerous
private companies. In determining
6
Mr. Hershs qualifications to serve on our Board of
Directors, the Board of Directors has considered, among other
things, his experience and expertise in finance, investment
banking and management in the energy industry and his extensive
record of investing in and helping to develop numerous private
and public oil and gas companies.
Thomas O. Hicks, Jr. was elected to the
Companys Board of Directors in September 2009.
Mr. Hicks has been a member of the Corporate
Governance/Nominating Committee since September 25, 2009,
and between September 25, 2009 and December 15, 2009,
was also a member of the Compensation Committee. He was a vice
president of Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. from
February 2007 through September 2009 and was its secretary from
August 2007 to September 2009. Mr. Hicks has served as a
vice president of Hicks Holdings since 2005. Hicks Holdings is a
Dallas-based family holding company for the Hicks family and a
private investment firm which owns and manages assets in sports
and real estate and makes corporate acquisitions. Mr. Hicks
has served as Alternate Governor for the Dallas Stars Hockey
Club. In 2004 and 2005, Mr. Hicks served as Director,
Corporate and Suite Sales, for the Texas Rangers Baseball
Club. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Hicks was an analyst at
Greenhill & Co. LLC, a New York based merchant banking
firm. As an analyst, Mr. Hicks was involved in numerous
private equity, mergers and acquisition, advisory and financial
restructuring transactions. Mr. Hicks currently serves as
the chairman of the Campaign for Children in Crisis for the Big
Brother Big Sisters Organization of North Texas, and is on the
boards of Big Brothers Big Sisters of North Texas, the Texas
Rangers Foundation, Capital for Kids and is a member of Business
Executives for National Security. In determining
Mr. Hickss qualifications to serve on our Board of
Directors, the Board of Directors has considered, among other
things, his experience and expertise in sales, banking and
management.
Robert M. Swartz was elected to the Companys
Board of Directors in September 2009. Mr. Swartz has been a
member of the Audit Committee since September 25, 2009, and
between September 25, 2009 and December 15, 2009, was
also a member of the Compensation and Corporate
Governance/Nominating Committees. He was a senior vice president
of Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. from September 2007
until September 2009, and currently serves as a managing
director and partner of Hicks Equity Partners LLC.
Mr. Swartz is on the Board of Directors of Anvita Health.
From 1999 until 2007, Mr. Swartz served in various
positions at Centex Corporation, a New York Stock Exchange home
building company, serving as Senior Vice President of Strategic
Planning and Mergers and Acquisitions from 1999 to 2000 and
serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Centex
HomeTeam Services from 2000 to 2007. From 1997 until 1999,
Mr. Swartz served as Executive Vice President of FirstPlus
Financial Group, Inc., a consumer finance company in Dallas,
Texas. In 1996, Mr. Swartz served as president and chief
executive officer of AMRE, Inc. a nationwide home services
provider. From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Swartz served as President
of Recognition International, an NYSE high-technology company,
and previously served from 1990 to 1993 as that companys
chief financial officer. Mr. Swartz received a Bachelors of
Science degree in accounting from the State University of New
York in Albany in 1973 and a Master of Business Administration
degree in finance from New Hampshire College in 1976.
Mr. Swartz is a Certified Public Accountant. In determining
Mr. Swartzs qualifications to serve on our Board of
Directors, the Board of Directors has considered, among other
things, his experience and expertise in mergers and
acquisitions, finance, accounting and management.
The Company was incorporated on July 28, 2009 to consummate
a business combination with HACI, a Delaware corporation
incorporated on February 26, 2007. HACI was formed to
acquire through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset
acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business
combination, one or more businesses or assets. HACIs
initial public offering was consummated on October 3, 2007.
HACI had neither engaged in any operations nor generated any
operating revenue prior to the business combination with us.
On September 25, 2009 (the Acquisition Date),
we consummated a business combination with HACI (the
Resolute Transaction) under the terms of a Purchase
and IPO Reorganization Agreement, dated as of August 2,
2009 (Acquisition Agreement) among the Company,
HACI, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC, Resolute Subsidiary
Corporation, Resolute Aneth, LLC, Resolute Holdings and HH HACI,
L.P., as amended. As a result of the Resolute Transaction, HACI
became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In
7
addition, the Company owned, directly or indirectly, prior to
the Resolute Transaction, and continues to own after the
Resolute Transaction, 100% of the equity interests of Resolute
Natural Resources Company, LLC (Resources), WYNR,
LLC (WYNR), BWNR, LLC (BWNR), RNRC
Holdings, Inc. (RNRC), and Resolute Wyoming, Inc.
(RWI) (formerly known as Primary Natural Resources,
Inc. (PNR)), and a 99.996% equity interest in
Resolute Aneth, LLC (Aneth), (collectively,
Resources, WYNR, BWNR, RNRC, Aneth and RWI are referred to as
Predecessor Resolute). The entities comprising
Predecessor Resolute prior to the Resolute Transaction were
wholly owned by Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC (except for Aneth,
which was 99.996% owned by Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC), which in
turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resolute Holdings. Under
generally accepted accounting principles, HACI was the
accounting acquirer in the Resolute Transaction.
Pursuant to the Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement the
parties agreed that the initial board of directors of the
Company would consist of (i) five members designated by
Resolute Holdings/NGP, which members were Messrs. Sutton,
Piccone, Hersh, Quinn and Covington, (ii) Thomas O. Hicks
or his designee, which was Thomas O. Hicks, Jr., and
(iii) two members to be proposed by Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc., which were Messrs. Swartz and
Cunningham, and one member to be proposed by Resolute Holdings
Sub LLC, which was Mr. Duffy. Such arrangements have been
superseded, with respect to Messrs. Duffy, Cunningham and
Quinn, by the determination made by the Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee to nominate such persons for re-election at
the Annual Meeting.
8
PROPOSAL TWORATIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed KPMG LLP
(KPMG) to act as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2010, and requests ratification of this appointment by our
stockholders. KPMG has served as our independent registered
public accounting firm since December 21, 2009. If our
stockholders do not ratify the appointment of KPMG, the adverse
vote would be considered as a direction to the Audit Committee
to consider other auditors for the subsequent fiscal year.
However, because of the difficulty and expense of making any
substitution of auditors after the beginning of the current
fiscal year, it is contemplated that the appointment for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, will be permitted to
stand unless the Audit Committee finds other reasons for making
a change. Even if the selection of KPMG is ratified, the Audit
Committee may, in its discretion, direct the appointment of new
auditors at any time during the year if it determines that such
a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our
stockholders.
As previously reported, Resolute engaged in a business
combination (the Resolute Transaction) with Hicks
Acquisition Company I, Inc. (HACI), consummated
on September 25, 2009. KPMG served as HACIs
independent registered public accounting firm prior to the
Resolute Transaction. Under generally accepted accounting
principles, HACI was the accounting acquirer.
Deloitte & Touche LLP (Deloitte &
Touche) was the auditor of Predecessor Resolute and of the
Company prior to the Resolute Transaction and was retained in
connection with the filing of the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Subsequent to the filing of the
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2009, the Company
elected to retain KPMG and to terminate the relationship between
the Company and Deloitte & Touche. On
December 16, 2009, the Company began the process of
retaining KPMG to serve as its independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
and dismissed Deloitte & Touche.
KPMG accepted its appointment as the Companys independent
registered public accountants on December 21, 2009. The
decision to retain KPMG and to terminate the relationship with
Deloitte & Touche was made by the Companys Audit
Committee.
The reports of Deloitte & Touche on the balance sheet
of the Company as of August 3, 2009, and on the financial
statements of Predecessor Resolute as of and for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 contained no adverse
opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were the reports qualified
or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting
principles; except that the report on Predecessor Resolute for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 did contain a going
concern uncertainty paragraph.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
and during the subsequent interim period that began on
January 1, 2009 and ended on December 16, 2009, there
were no disagreements with Deloitte & Touche on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreements, if they had occurred and not been resolved to the
satisfaction of Deloitte & Touche, would have caused
Deloitte & Touche to make reference to such
disagreements in their reports on the financial statements for
such years; and there were no reportable events as described in
Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
and during the subsequent interim period that began on
January 1, 2009 and ended on December 16, 2009, we did
not consult with KPMG regarding either (i) the application
of accounting principles to any specific completed or proposed
transaction, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered
on our financial statements, nor did KPMG provide written or
oral advice to us that KPMG concluded was an important factor
considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting,
auditing or financial reporting issue or (ii) any matter
that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in
Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of
Regulation S-K)
or a reportable event (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K).
During such periods, KPMG was the auditor for HACI.
Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the Annual
Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they
desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to
appropriate questions.
9
The Board recommends a vote FOR ratification of the
appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2010.
The following table presents the aggregate fees billed for the
indicated services performed by KPMG for the 2008 and 2009
fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Audit fees(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
366,500
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
366,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit fees include fees for the audit of the financial
statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and
issuance of consents, which were billed and paid in 2010. |
The charter of the Audit Committee includes certain policies and
procedures regarding the pre-approval of audit and non-audit
services performed by an outside accountant. The committee is
required to pre-approve all engagement letters and fees for all
auditing services (including providing comfort letters in
connection with securities underwritings) and permissible
non-audit services, subject to any exception under
Section 10A of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated
thereunder. Pre-approval authority may be delegated to a
committee member or a subcommittee, and any such member or
subcommittee shall report any decisions to the full committee at
its next scheduled meeting. All of the services described in
Fees Paid to Principal Accountants were
approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the pre-approval
policies.
Our management is responsible for the preparation of our
financial statements and our independent registered public
accounting firm, KPMG LLP, is responsible for auditing our
annual financial statements and expressing an opinion as to
whether they are presented fairly, in all material respects, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The Audit Committee is responsible for, among
other things, reviewing and selecting our independent registered
public accounting firm, reviewing our annual and interim
financial statements and pre-approving all engagement letters
and fees for auditing services.
In the performance of its oversight function in connection with
our financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2009, the Audit Committee has:
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with
management;
|
|
|
|
Discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA,
Professional Standards, Vol. 1 AU section 380), as adopted
by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T;
|
|
|
|
Received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG
required by applicable requirements of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMGs communications
with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has
discussed with KPMG its independence; and
|
|
|
|
Reviewed and approved the services provided by KPMG.
|
10
Based upon the reports and discussions described above, and
subject to the limitations on the roles and responsibilities of
the Audit Committee referred to in its charter, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved,
that the Companys audited financial statements be included
in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2010.
AUDIT COMMITTEE:
Robert M. Swartz, Chairman
James E. Duffy
William H. Cunningham
11
OTHER
BUSINESS
The Board knows of no other business to be brought before the
Annual Meeting. If, however, any other business should properly
come before the Annual Meeting, the Proxy Agents will vote
proxies on such matters in the manner they deem appropriate or
within the discretionary power they have been provided.
The following table, based in part upon information supplied by
officers, directors and principal stockholders, sets forth
certain information known to the Company with respect to
beneficial ownership of the Companys common stock par
value $0.0001 per share (Common Stock) as of
April 20, 2010, by (i) each person known to the
Company to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of the
Companys Common Stock, (ii) each Named Executive
Officer (see Executive Compensation Summary
Compensation Table), (iii) each director of the
Company, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of
the Company as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, each
person has sole voting and investment power with respect to all
shares shown as beneficially owned, subject to community
property laws where applicable. Voting power is the power to
vote or direct the voting of securities, and dispositive power
is the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of
securities.
For purposes of this beneficial ownership table,
(x) Earnout Shares are shares of Common Stock
subject to forfeiture, unless at any time prior to
September 25, 2014, either (a) the closing sale price
of Common Stock exceeds $15.00 per share for 20 trading days in
any 30 trading day period or (b) a change in control event
occurs in which Common Stock is valued at greater than $15.00
per share, (y) Founders Warrants are
warrants that entitle the holder to purchase one share of
Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share, subject to
adjustment, commencing any time after the last sale price of
Common Stock exceeds $13.75 for any 20 days within any
30 day trading period prior to September 25, 2014, and
(z) Sponsors Warrants are warrants which
entitle the holder to purchase one share of Common Stock at a
price of $13.00 per share at any time prior to
September 25, 2014. For purposes of calculating beneficial
ownership as of April 20, 2010, Earnout Shares and shares
issuable on exercise of Sponsors Warrants are considered
to be beneficially owned by the holders thereof, but shares
issuable on exercise of Founders Warrants are not
considered to be beneficially owned by such holders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
SPO Advisory Corp.
591 Redwood Highway, Suite 3215
Mill Valley, CA 94941
|
|
|
18,421,059
|
(2)
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pine River Capital Management L.P.
601 Carlson Parkway, Suite 330
Minnetonka, MN 55305
|
|
|
4,542,222
|
(3)
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas O. Hicks
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75201
|
|
|
10,036,923
|
(4)
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory Research Energy Fund, L.P.
180 North Stetson St., Suite 5500
Chicago, IL 60601
|
|
|
3,766,466
|
(5)
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory Research Inc.
180 North Stetson St., Suite 5500
Chicago, IL 60601
|
|
|
8,021,250
|
(6)
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P.
125 E. John Carpenter Fwy., Suite 600
Irving, TX 75062
|
|
|
10,284,318
|
(7)(8)(9)
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
Resolute Holdings LLC
1675 Broadway, Suite 1950
Denver, CO 80202
|
|
|
3,718,433
|
(7)(9)
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth A. Hersh
125 E. John Carpenter Fwy., Suite 600
Irving, TX 75062
|
|
|
10,284,318
|
(7)(8)(11)
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janet W. Pasque
|
|
|
243,233
|
(10)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Quinn
|
|
|
0
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James M. Piccone
|
|
|
266,243
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James E. Duffy
|
|
|
1,373
|
(12)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard L. Covington
|
|
|
0
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore Gazulis
|
|
|
266,242
|
(13)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas O. Hicks, Jr.
|
|
|
33,698
|
(12)(14)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Swartz
|
|
|
141,448
|
(12)(15)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dale E. Cantwell
|
|
|
254,738
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard F. Betz
|
|
|
265,243
|
(16)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
|
608,518
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Cunningham
|
|
|
33,698
|
(12)(17)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)
|
|
|
12,398,752
|
(7)(8)(18)
|
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Security ownership information for beneficial owners is taken
from statements filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to Sections 13(d), 13(g) and 16(a) and
information made known to the Company. Beneficial ownership is
determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment
power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject
to options or warrants that are currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table are
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of the person holding those options or
warrants, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The
percentage of beneficial ownership is based on
53,160,375 shares of common stock outstanding as of
April 20, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
This disclosure is based on the Schedule 13D/A filed with
the SEC on October 29, 2009 by SPO Advisory Corp. on behalf
of SPO Partners II, L.P., SPO Advisory Partners, L.P.,
San Francisco Partners, L.P., SF Advisory Partners, L.P.,
SPO Advisory Corp., John H. Scully, William E. Oberndorf,
William J. Patterson and Edward H. McDermott.
Messrs. Scully, Oberndorf, Patterson and McDermott are the
four controlling persons of SPO Advisory Corp., which is the
sole general partner of the sole general partners of SPO
Partners II, L.P. and San Francisco Partners, L.P., and may
be deemed to beneficially own the shares owned by SPO Partners
II, L.P. and San Francisco Partners, L.P. Of these shares,
SPO Partners II, L.P., through its sole general partner, SPO
Advisory Partners, L.P., holds sole voting and dispositive power
over 17,672,325 shares (9,502,800 shares of Company
Common Stock and warrants covering 8,169,525 shares of
Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise); SPO Advisory
Partners, L.P., through its sole general partner, SPO Advisory
Corp, and in |
13
|
|
|
|
|
its capacity as sole general partner of SPO Partners II, L.P.,
holds sole voting and dispositive power over
17,672,325 shares (9,502,800 shares of Company Common
Stock and warrants covering 8,169,525 shares of Company
Common Stock issuable upon exercise); San Francisco
Partners, L.P., through its sole general partner, SF Advisory
Partners, L.P., holds sole voting and dispositive power over
607,253 shares (327,500 shares of Company Common Stock
and warrants covering 279,753 shares of Company Common
Stock issuable upon exercise); SF Advisory Partners, L.P.,
through its sole general partner SPO Advisory Corp and in its
capacity as sole general partner of San Francisco Partners,
L.P. holds sole voting and dispositive power over
607,253 shares (327,500 shares of Company Common Stock
and warrants covering 279,753 shares of Company Common
Stock issuable upon exercise); SPO Advisory Corp, in its
capacity as (i) sole general partner of SPO Advisory
Partners, L.P., holds sole voting and dispositive power with
respect to 9,502,800 shares of Company Common Stock and
warrants covering 8,169,525 shares of Company Common Stock
issuable upon exercise, and as (ii) the sole general
partner of SF Advisory Partners, L.P. holds sole voting and
dispositive power with respect to 327,500 shares of Company
Common Stock and warrants covering 279,753 shares of
Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise; and power is
exercised through its four controlling persons, John H. Scully,
William E. Oberndorf, William J. Patterson and Edward H.
McDermott. John H. Scully holds sole voting power over
3,913 shares held in the John H. Scully Individual
Retirement Account, which is self-directed, and shared voting
and dispositive power over 18,279,578 shares (there are
9,830,300 shares of Company Common Stock and warrants
covering 8,449,278 shares of Company Common Stock issuable
upon exercise) beneficially owned by Mr. Scully solely in
his capacity as one of four controlling persons of SPO Advisory
Corp. William E. Oberndorf holds sole voting and dispositive
power over 135,788 shares held in the William E. Oberndorf
Individual Retirement Account, which is self-directed, and
shared voting and dispositive power over 18,279,578 shares
(there are 9,830,300 shares of Company Common Stock and
warrants covering 8,449,278 shares of Company Common Stock
issuable upon exercise) beneficially owned by Mr. Oberndorf
solely in his capacity as one of four controlling persons of SPO
Advisory Corp. William J. Patterson holds sole voting and
dispositive power over 358 shares held in the William J.
Patterson Individual Retirement Account, which is self-directed,
and shared voting and dispositive power over
18,279,578 shares (there are 9,830,300 shares of
Company Common Stock and warrants covering 8,449,278 shares
of Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise) beneficially
owned by Mr. Patterson solely in his capacity as one of
four controlling persons of SPO Advisory Corp. Edward H.
McDermott holds sole voting and dispositive power over
1,422 shares held in the Edward H. McDermott Individual
Retirement Account, which is self-directed, and shared voting
and dispositive power over 18,279,578 shares (there are
9,830,300 shares of Company Common Stock and warrants
covering 8,449,278 shares of Company Common Stock issuable
upon exercise) beneficially owned by Mr. McDermott solely
in his capacity as one of four controlling persons of SPO
Advisory Corp. |
|
(3) |
|
This disclosure is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Pine
River Capital Management L.P. on behalf of Brian Taylor and
Nisswa Acquisition Master Fund Ltd. with the SEC on
January 29, 2010. The reporting person shares voting and
dispositive power over 4,542,222 shares with Brian Taylor
and shares voting and dispositive power over
4,333,177 shares with Nisswa Acquisition Master
Fund Ltd. |
|
(4) |
|
This disclosure is based on a (i) Schedule 13D/A filed
by Thomas O. Hicks on behalf of HH-HACI, L.P. (HH
LP), HH-HACI GP, LLC, (HH LLC, the general
partner of HH LP) and Mr. Hicks, the sole member of HH LLC,
and (ii) a Form 4 filed by HH LP, each of which was
filed with the SEC on October 21, 2009. HH LLC has sole
voting and dispositive power over 430 shares (which
includes 124 Earnout Shares) and shared voting and dispositive
power over 301,913 shares (which includes 87,093 Earnout
Shares). HH LLC also owns 613 Founders Warrants. HH LP has
sole voting and dispositive power over 301, 913 shares
(which includes 87,093 Earnout Shares). HH LP also owns 429,636
Founders Warrants. Thomas O. Hicks has sole voting and
dispositive power over 7,200,301 shares and shared voting
and dispositive power over 2,836,622 shares. The |
14
|
|
|
|
|
7,200,301 shares includes 730,894 Earnout Shares and
4,666,667 Sponsors Warrants. Mr. Hicks also owns
3,605,481 Founders Warrants. The 2,836,622 shares
over which Mr. Hicks has shared voting and dispositive
power include 430 shares of Company Common Stock held by HH
LLC, 301,913 shares of Company Common Stock held by HH LP
(each described above) and 2,534,279 shares of Company
Common Stock held by Mr. Hicks charitable foundation
and estate planning entities for his family. The
2,534,279 shares include 731,079 Earnout Shares.
Mr. Hicks charitable foundation and estate planning
entities also own 3,606,400 Founders Warrants. HH LLC disclaims
beneficial ownership of shares of Company Common Stock owned by
HH LP, except to the extent of its pecuniary interest.
Mr. Hicks disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares held
by other entities, except to the extent of his pecuniary
interest. |
|
(5) |
|
This disclosure is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by
Advisory Research Energy Fund, L.P. with the SEC on
February 12, 2010. Advisory Research Energy Fund, L.P.
shares with its general partner, Advisory Research, Inc., voting
and dispositive power over these shares, which include
2,516,466 shares underlying currently exercisable warrants.
Advisory Research Energy Fund, L.P. claims beneficial ownership
over 3,766,466 shares. |
|
(6) |
|
This disclosure is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by
Advisory Research Inc. with the SEC on February 12, 2010.
Advisory Research Inc. shares voting and dispositive power over
these shares, which include 2,516,466 shares underlying
currently exercisable warrants. Advisory Research Inc. manages
accounts that may have the right to receive or the power to
direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the
sale of, 8,021,250 shares. The interest of one such
account, owned by Advisory Research Energy Fund L.P.,
relates to ownership over 3,766,466 shares, and is reported
separately. |
|
(7) |
|
Based on (i) a Form 3 filed by Natural Gas Partners
VII, L.P. (NGP VII) with the SEC on
February 16, 2010, (ii) a Schedule 13D filed with
the SEC on February 22, 2010 on behalf of Kenneth A. Hersh,
NGP VII and Resolute Holdings and (iii) a Form 5 filed
by Kenneth Hersh with the SEC on February 16, 2010. NGP VII
shares voting and dispositive power over 4,008,152 shares
and has sole voting and dispositive power over
6,276,166 shares. Securities beneficially owned are
comprised as follows: (i) direct ownership of
6,276,166 shares of Company Common Stock distributed by
Resolute Holdings to NGP VII on December 21, 2009 in a pro
rata distribution by Resolute Holdings to its members for no
consideration; (ii) indirect ownership of
289,719 shares of Company Common Stock owned directly by
NGP-VII Income Co-Investment Opportunities, L.P.
(Co-Invest) and received in a pro rata distribution
by Resolute Holdings to its members for no consideration. NGP
VII owns 100% of NGP Income Management, L.L.C., which is the
sole general partner of Co-Invest. NGP VII may be deemed to be
the indirect beneficial owner of the 289,719 shares of
Company Common Stock owned by Co-Invest; (iii) indirect
ownership of 1,385,100 shares of Common Stock (including
1,385,000 Earnout Shares) owned by Resolute Holdings. NGP VII
and Co-Invest own approximately 71% of the outstanding
membership interests of Resolute Holdings and therefore may be
deemed to be the indirect beneficial owners of the Common Stock
owned by Resolute Holdings; (iv) indirect ownership of
2,333,333 Sponsors Warrants owned by Resolute Holdings.
Resolute Holdings also owns 4,600,000 Founders Warrants.
NGP VII may be deemed to be the indirect beneficial owner of
Earnout Shares and warrants owned by Resolute Holdings. NGP VII
disclaims beneficial ownership of the reported securities except
to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 10,284,318 shares over which Mr. Hersh has
shared voting and dispositive power. Mr. Hersh is an
Authorized Member of GFW VII, L.L.C., which is the sole general
partner of G.F.W. Energy VII, L.P., which is the sole general
partner of NGP VII. Thus, Mr. Hersh may be deemed to
indirectly beneficially own all the Company Common Stock
directly and/or indirectly deemed beneficially owned by NGP VII.
Mr. Hersh disclaims beneficial ownership of the reported
securities except to the extent of his pecuniary interest
therein. |
15
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Resolute Holdings has sole voting and dispositive power over
3,718,433 shares, consisting of (i) 1,385,000 Earnout
Shares, (ii) 100 shares of Company Common Stock and
(iii) 2,333,333 Sponsors Warrants. Resolute Holdings
also owns 4,600,000 Founders Warrants. NGP VII and
Co-Invest
own approximately 71% of the outstanding membership interests of
Resolute Holdings and therefore may be deemed to be the indirect
beneficial owners of the Common Stock, Earnout Shares and
warrants owned by Resolute Holdings. |
|
(10) |
|
All shares are held in a trust over which the reporting person
is a co-trustee. |
|
(11) |
|
Messrs. Hersh, Quinn and Covington have waived their
director compensation that would have been paid through the
issuance of Company Common Stock on March 16, 2010. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 1,373 shares of restricted stock granted pursuant
to the 2009 performance incentive plan. 343 shares vested
on the date of grant, March 16, 2010, 343 shares vest
on the first and second anniversaries of the date of grant, and
344 shares vest on the third anniversary of the date of
grant. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes 227, 780 shares held by the reporting person in a
revocable trust. |
|
(14) |
|
Includes (i) 23,000 shares of Company Common Stock and
(ii) 9,325 Earnout Shares. Excludes 45,999 Founders
Warrants. |
|
(15) |
|
Includes (i) 99,666 shares of Company Common Stock and
(ii) 40,409 Earnout Shares. Excludes 199,332 Founders
Warrants. |
|
(16) |
|
Includes 46,692 shares held by the reporting person in
custodial accounts. |
|
(17) |
|
Includes (i) 23,000 shares of Company Common Stock and
(ii) 9,325 Earnout Shares. Excludes 46,000 Founders
Warrants. |
|
(18) |
|
Includes 4,120 shares of restricted stock that are subject
to future vesting. |
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who
own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership
and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock. To our
knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such
reports available to us and written representations that no
other reports were required, we believe that all reporting
obligations of our officers, directors and greater than ten
percent stockholders under Section 16(a) were satisfied
during the year ended December 31, 2009, except as follows:
Resolute Holdings, LLC, a beneficial owner of more than 10% of
our common stock, filed one late Form 4; Natural Gas
Partners VII, a beneficial owner of more than 10% of our common
stock, filed one late Form 3; and Kenneth A. Hersh, a
director, filed one late Form 5.
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to
directors, officers and employees that complies with the rules
and regulations of the NYSE and SEC. The Code of Ethics is
posted on the Companys website, at
www.resoluteenergy.com, under the Investor
Relations tab, subheading Corporate
Governance. All amendments to, and waivers granted under,
the Companys code of ethics will be disseminated on the
Companys website in the manner required by SEC and NYSE
rules.
16
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
The Companys business is managed under the direction of
its Board of Directors. In connection with its oversight of the
Companys operations and governance, the Board of Directors
has adopted, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Governance Guidelines to implement certain policies
regarding the governance of the Company;
|
|
|
|
a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to provide guidance to
directors, officers and employees with regard to certain ethical
and compliance issues;
|
|
|
|
Charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and
the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee of the Board of
Directors;
|
|
|
|
an Insider Trading Policy to facilitate compliance with insider
trading regulations;
|
|
|
|
an Audit Committee Whistleblower Policy to allow directors,
officers and employees (i) to make confidential anonymous
submissions regarding concerns with respect to accounting or
auditing matters and (ii) provides for the receipt of
complaints regarding accounting, internal controls or
auditing; and
|
|
|
|
a Stockholder and Interested Parties Communication Policy
pursuant to which holders of our securities and other interested
parties can communicate with the Board of Directors, Board
Committees
and/or
individual directors.
|
Other than the Insider Trading Policy, each of these documents
can be viewed on the Companys website, available at:
www.resoluteenergy.com under the Investor
Relations tab, subheading Corporate Governance.
Copies of the foregoing documents and disclosures are available
without charge to any person who requests them. Requests should
be directed to Resolute Energy Corporation, Attn: Secretary,
1675 Broadway, Suite 1950, Denver, Colorado 80202.
The Board meets regularly to review significant developments
affecting us and to act on matters requiring its approval. The
Board held two meetings in 2009 and acted nine times by written
consent. On and after September 25, 2009, when the current
board took office, the board met one time and acted two times by
written consent. No director, during his period of service in
2009, attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of
the Board and committees on which he served. Directors are
encouraged, but not required, to attend the Annual Meeting.
Because the Company was formed in July 2009, no annual
stockholders meeting was held in 2009.
Under the rules of the NYSE, a majority of the members of the
Board of Directors and all of the members of certain committees
must be composed of independent directors, as
defined in the rules of the NYSE. In general, an
independent director is a person other than an
officer or employee of the Company or any other individual who
has a relationship, which, in the opinion of the Companys
Board of Directors, would interfere with the directors
exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the
responsibilities of a director. Additional independence and
qualification requirements apply to our directors serving on
certain committees. As discussed under
Board Committees, the Company has
standing Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance/Nominating
Committees, each of which is composed entirely of independent
directors, under each of the applicable standards. The
Companys Board of Directors has determined that, other
than Messrs. Sutton and Piccone, each member of the Board
of Directors is independent under the NYSE rules. In making that
determination, the Board of Directors considered the
relationships of Messrs. Swartz and Hicks with HACI and
HH-HACI, L.P., and the relationships of Messrs. Hersh,
Covington and Quinn with various NGP entities.
17
The composition and primary responsibilities of the Audit
Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate
Governance/Nominating Committee are described below.
Audit
Committee
The Company has a separately designated Audit Committee, the
members of which are Messrs. Duffy, Cunningham and Swartz,
with Mr. Swartz serving as Chairman. The primary function
of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in
its oversight of the Companys financial reporting process.
Among other things, the committee is responsible for reviewing
and selecting our independent registered public accounting firm
and reviewing our accounting practices and policies, and to
serve as an independent and objective party to monitor the
financial reporting process. The Board of Directors has
determined that each of Mr. Swartz, Mr. Duffy and
Dr. Cunningham qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of SEC
Regulation S-K
and that each member of the committee is independent for
purposes of SEC
Rule 10A-3,
and financially literate for purposes of applicable
NYSE rules. See Proposal One Election
of Directors Board of Directors for a
summary of the business experience of each member of the
committee. During 2009, the Audit Committee held eight meetings.
Compensation
Committee
The Company has a separately designated Compensation Committee,
which currently consists of Messrs. Duffy, Covington, Hersh
and Quinn, with Mr. Duffy acting as Chairman. The
Compensation Committees primary function is to discharge
the Board of Directors responsibilities relating to the
compensation of our CEO and to make recommendations to the Board
regarding the compensation of our other executive officers.
Among other things, the committee reviews and approves corporate
goals and objectives for setting CEO compensation, evaluates the
performance of the CEO in light of those goals and objectives
and sets the compensation of the CEO. No compensation
consultants were engaged in 2009. In February 2010, the Company
engaged Effective Compensation, Inc. as its compensation
consultant. The Board has determined that each member of the
committee is (i) independent under applicable NYSE rules,
(ii) a non-employee director as defined in
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act and (iii) an outside
director as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code. During 2009, the Compensation Committee held one
meeting and acted once by written consent.
Corporate
Governance/Nominating Committee
The Company has a separately designated Corporate
Governance/Nominating Committee, the members of which are
Messrs. Covington, Hersh and Hicks, with Mr. Covington
serving as Chairman. The primary function of the Corporate
Governance/Nominating Committee is to assist the Board of
Directors with identifying, evaluating and recommending to the
Board qualified candidates for election or appointment to the
Board, (ii) reviewing, evaluating and recommending changes
to the Companys corporate governance guidelines and
(iii) monitoring and overseeing matters of corporate
governance, including the evaluation of Board and management
performance and the independence of directors. The
Board has determined that each member of the committee is
independent under applicable NYSE rules. During 2009, the
Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee held one meeting.
Director
Nominations
The charter of the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee
provides that director candidates recommended by security
holders will be considered on the same basis as candidates
recommended by other persons. A security holder who wishes to
recommend a candidate should send complete information regarding
the candidate to Resolute Energy Corporation, Attn: Secretary,
1675 Broadway, Suite 1950, Denver, Colorado 80202. The
information provided with respect to the nominee should include
five years of professional background, academic qualifications,
whether the nominee has been subject to any legal proceedings in
the past ten years, the relationship between the security holder
and the nominee, and any other specific
18
experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that qualify
the nominee for the Board. The committee will assess each
candidate, including candidates recommended by security holders,
by evaluating all factors it considers appropriate, which may
include career specialization, relevant technical skills or
financial acumen, diversity of viewpoint and industry knowledge.
The charter provides that nominees must meet certain minimum
qualifications. In particular, a nominee must:
|
|
|
|
|
have displayed the highest personal and professional ethics,
integrity and values and sound business judgment;
|
|
|
|
be highly accomplished in his or her field, with superior
credentials and recognition and broad experience at the
administrative or policy-making level in business, government,
education, technology or public interest;
|
|
|
|
have relevant expertise and experience and be able to offer
guidance and advice to the chief executive officer based on that
expertise and experience;
|
|
|
|
with respect to a majority of directors, be independent and able
to represent all stockholders and be committed to enhancing long
term stockholder value; and
|
|
|
|
have sufficient time available to devote to the activities of
the Board of Directors and to enhance his or her knowledge of
the Companys business.
|
The committee does not have a formal policy with respect to the
consideration of diversity when assessing director nominees, but
considers diversity as part of its overall assessment of the
Boards functioning and needs. The committee may retain a
search firm to assist it in identifying potential candidates,
but it has not done so to date.
The Board schedules regular executive sessions involving
exclusively non-management directors, as required by NYSE rules,
at the time of each in-person board meeting. Mr. Covington,
as our lead independent director, presides at all such executive
sessions.
In recognition of the importance of providing all interested
parties, including but not limited to, the holders of Resolute
securities, with the ability to communicate with members of the
Board, including non-management directors, the Board has adopted
a Stockholder and Interested Parties Communication Policy, a
copy of which is available on our website. Pursuant to the
policy, interested parties may direct correspondence to the
Board, or to any individual director and the lead independent
director by mail to the following address: Resolute Energy
Corporation, Attn: Lead Independent Director, 1675 Broadway,
Suite 1950, Denver, CO 80202.
Communications should not exceed 1,000 words in length and
should indicate (i) the type and amount of Resolute
securities held by the person submitting the communication, if
any, and/or
the nature of the persons interest in Resolute,
(ii) any personal interest the person has in the subject
matter of the communication and (iii) the persons
mailing address,
e-mail
address and telephone number. Unless the communication relates
to an improper topic (e.g., it contains offensive content or
advocates that we engage in illegal activities) or it fails to
satisfy the procedural requirements of the policy, we will
deliver it to the person(s) to whom it is addressed.
We are incorporated in the State of Delaware and, accordingly,
are subject to the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under the
Delaware General Corporation Law, our stockholders are not
entitled to appraisal rights with respect to any of the
proposals to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting.
19
Any proposal that a stockholder wishes to include in proxy
materials for our 2011 annual meeting of stockholders must be
received no later than January 10, 2011 and must be
submitted in compliance with SEC
Rule 14a-8.
Proposals should be directed to Resolute Energy Corporation,
Attn: Secretary, 1675 Broadway, Suite 1950, Denver,
Colorado 80202.
Any proposal or nomination for director that a stockholder
wishes to propose for consideration at the 2011 annual meeting
of stockholders, but does not seek to include in our proxy
statement under applicable SEC rules, must be submitted in
accordance with Section 2.7 of our bylaws, and must be
received at our principal executive offices no earlier than
February 10, 2011, and no later than March 12, 2011,
in each case assuming that the 2011 annual meeting is held on
the anniversary of the Annual Meeting. Any such proposal must be
an appropriate subject for stockholder action under applicable
law and must otherwise comply with Section 2.7 of our
bylaws.
Pursuant to SEC
Rule 14a-4(c)(1),
if our Secretary receives any stockholder proposal at the
address listed above after March 12, 2011 that is intended
to be presented at the 2011 annual meeting without inclusion in
the proxy statement for the meeting, the proxies designated by
the Board will have discretionary authority to vote on such
proposal.
Our Board of Directors currently consists of nine directors, all
of whom, other than Messrs. Sutton and Piccone, have been
determined to be independent directors under the
rules of the NYSE. Mr. Sutton has served as CEO since the
Company became a public company in September 2009, was Chief
Executive Officer of Resolute Holdings from its inception in
2004, and was instrumental in the completion of the Resolute
Transaction. He is most familiar with the Companys
properties and, based on his years as chairman and chief
executive officer of HS Resources from 1978 to 2001, has
demonstrated skills in building and leading a public oil and gas
company. Accordingly, the Board of Directors believes that he is
uniquely qualified to be the person who sets the agenda for, and
leads discussion of, strategic issues for the Company. Our Lead
Independent Director, Mr. Covington, presides over
executive sessions of the independent directors, which occur at
the time of each in-person board meeting. The Board appointed
Mr. Covington as the Lead Independent Director in March
2010. In such capacity, Mr. Covington reviews agendas for
Board meetings, reviews with Mr. Sutton annual goals and
objectives for the Company, and consults with the Board
regarding its evaluation of the performance of the CEO. The
Board believes that its supermajority of independent directors
and other aspects of its governance provides appropriate
independent oversight to Board decisions.
The Board of Directors oversees the risks involved in the
Companys operations as part of its general oversight
function, integrating risk management into the Companys
compliance policies and procedures. While the Board has the
ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management
process, the Audit Committee has certain specific
responsibilities relating to risk management. Among other
things, the Audit Committee, pursuant to its charter, addresses
Company policies with respect to risk assessment and risk
management, and reviews major risk exposures (whether financial,
operating or otherwise) and the guidelines and policies that
management has put in place to govern the process of assessing,
controlling, managing and reporting such exposures. While the
charters of the Compensation and Corporate Governance/Nominating
Committees do not assign specific risk-related responsibilities
to those committees, the committees nevertheless consider risk
and risk management issues in the course of performing their
duties with respect to compensation and governance issues,
respectively.
20
The following table sets forth certain information as of
April 20, 2010, regarding the current executive officers of
the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James M. Piccone
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
President, General Counsel, Secretary and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard F. Betz
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Strategy and Planning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dale E. Cantwell
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore Gazulis
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janet W. Pasque
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Land and Business
Development
|
Nicholas J. Sutton See
Proposal One Election of
Directors Board of Directors for
Mr. Suttons biography.
James M. Piccone See
Proposal One Election of
Directors Board of Directors for
Mr. Piccones biography.
Richard F. Betz has been Senior Vice President of
the Company since September 25, 2009, and was Vice
President Business Development of the Company from
July 2009 to September 2009. He has been Vice President,
Business Development of Predecessor Resolute and Resolute
Holdings since their founding in 2004. From September 2001 to
January 2004, Mr. Betz was involved in various financial
consulting activities related to the energy industry. Prior to
that, Mr. Betz spent 17 years with Chase Securities
and successor companies, where he was involved primarily in oil
and gas corporate finance. Mr. Betz was a Managing Director
in the oil and gas investment banking coverage group with
primary responsibility for mid-cap exploration and production
companies as well as leveraged finance and private equity. In
that capacity, Mr. Betz worked with the HS Resources
management team for approximately twelve years.
Dale E. Cantwell has been Senior Vice President,
Operations of the Company since September 25, 2009, and was
Vice President Operations of the Company from July
2009 to September 2009. He has been Vice President, Operations
of Predecessor Resolute and Resolute Holdings since their
founding in 2004. From March 2003 to January 2004,
Mr. Cantwell was a private investor. After the acquisition
of HS Resources by Kerr-McGee Corporation in August 2001 until
February 2003, Mr. Cantwell was Vice President of
Kerr-McGee
Rocky Mountain Corporation. Prior to that, Mr. Cantwell was
Vice President of Operations for HS Resources D-J Basin
District. From 1979 until joining HS Resources in 1993, he
worked for Amoco Production Company in various engineering and
marketing capacities. Mr. Cantwell is a member of the
Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Theodore Gazulis has been Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since
September 25, 2009, and was Vice President of Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company from July
2009 to September 2009. He has been Vice President
Finance, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Predecessor
Resolute and Resolute Holdings since their founding in 2004.
Mr. Gazulis served as a Vice President of HS Resources from
1984 until its merger with Kerr-McGee Corporation in 2001.
Mr. Gazulis had primary responsibility for HS
Resources capital markets activity and for investor
relations and information technology. Subsequent to HS
Resources acquisition by Kerr-McGee Corporation and prior
to the formation of Predecessor Resolute, Mr. Gazulis was a
private investor and also undertook assignments with two
privately-held oil and gas companies, serving on the Board of
Directors of Contour Energy Co. and performing the functions of
the Chief Financial Officer of Venoco, Inc. on a consulting
basis. Prior to joining
21
HS Resources, he worked for Amoco Production Company and Sohio
Petroleum Company. Mr. Gazulis is a member of the American
Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Janet W. Pasque has been Senior Vice President,
Land and Development of the Company since September 25,
2009, and was Vice President Land of the Company
from July 2009 to September 2009. She has been Vice President,
Land of Predecessor Resolute and Resolute Holdings since their
founding in 2004. Ms. Pasque was a Vice President of HS
Resources where she had responsibility for the land department
and joint responsibility for the companys exploration
activities from 1993 until the companys acquisition by
Kerr-McGee
Corporation in late 2001. Subsequent to the HS Resources
acquisition by Kerr-McGee, Ms. Pasque managed the land
functions at Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain Corp. until early 2003.
Ms. Pasque served as a land consultant from 2003 until the
founding of Resolute Holdings in 2004. Prior to joining HS
Resources in 1993, Ms. Pasque worked for Texaco Inc. and
Champlin Petroleum Company. Ms. Pasque is a member of the
American Association of Professional Landmen.
There are no family relationships among any of the
Companys directors and executive officers.
22
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes the total compensation paid or
earned by our principal executive officer, our principal
financial officer and four other most highly compensated
executive officers (the Named Executive Officers)
who served as executive officers from September 25, 2009,
the date the Company became a public reporting entity, through
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Nicholas J.
Sutton(1)(2)(5)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
191,827
|
|
|
$
|
138,111
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,700
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
344,638
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James M.
Piccone(1)(2)(5)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
102,308
|
|
|
$
|
100,611
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,508
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
218,427
|
|
President, General Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore
Gazulis(1)(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
88,846
|
|
|
$
|
88,111
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,700
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
191,657
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard F.
Betz(1)(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
88,846
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
163,846
|
|
Senior Vice President, Strategy and Planning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dale E.
Cantwell(1)(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
88,846
|
|
|
$
|
88,111
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,508
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
192,465
|
|
Senior Vice President, Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janet W.
Pasque(1)(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
88,846
|
|
|
$
|
88,111
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,508
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
192,465
|
|
Senior Vice President, Land and Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each of the executive officers assumed such position with the
Company upon completion of the Resolute Transaction on
September 25, 2009, at which time the Company became a
reporting company pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Prior to that time, each executive officer was employed by
Predecessor Resolute, and, in that capacity, received the
following salary and other compensation for the period from
January 1, 2009 through September 24, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary and Other
Compensation
|
|
Salary
|
|
All Other Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
$
|
71,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James M. Piccone
|
|
$
|
120,481
|
|
|
|
$2,201
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore Gazulis
|
|
$
|
120,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard E. Betz
|
|
$
|
120,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dale E. Cantwell
|
|
$
|
120,481
|
|
|
|
$2,201
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janet W. Pasque
|
|
$
|
120,481
|
|
|
|
$2,201
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Each of the executive officers is
also an officer of Resolute Holdings, and has received equity
and other compensation in such capacity. Such compensation is
not included in the above table.
|
|
(3)
|
|
$13,111 of the bonus relates to
matching 401(k) contributions that would have been made in 2009
in respect of 2008 employee contributions in accordance
with policies of Predecessor Resolute. Because Predecessor
Resolute had
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
suspended its matching
contributions in 2009, the Company determined to pay the amount
of such matching contributions in the form of a cash payment.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of (i) contributions
pursuant to the Companys 401(k) plan to match employee
contributions made in 2009 and (ii) the value of parking
paid for by the Company. The 401(k) matching contribution was
paid in 2010, but accrued on the Companys financial
statements in 2009.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Mr. Sutton and
Mr. Piccone are also directors of the Company but received
no compensation for their services as directors.
|
The Company has one equity incentive plan, the 2009 Performance
Incentive Plan (the Plan), pursuant to which the
Company may grant stock options, restricted stock, restricted
stock units and stock appreciation rights to executive officers
and directors. The Plan provides for the issuance of up to
2,657,744 shares of common stock. No plan-based awards were
made to the Named Executive Officers in 2009.
Named executive officers had no outstanding equity awards under
the Plan at December 31, 2009.
No options to purchase Company Common Stock were exercised by
Named Executive Officers in 2009, and no options held by Named
Executive Officers vested in 2009.
The Company has no defined benefit pension plans.
In the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company had no
nonqualified plan that provides for deferral of compensation to
Named Executive Officers.
There are currently no agreements under which the Named
Executive Officers would be entitled to receive payments upon
termination or upon a change of control of the Company.
Predecessor Resolute is a party to agreements with the Named
Executive Officers giving it the right, in its sole discretion,
to make severance payments to any executive officer for up to
eighteen months following termination other than for Cause (as
defined), or upon voluntary resignation following a reduction in
annual salary. Severance payments, if made, would be equal to
the executives salary immediately prior to termination.
During the period in which severance payments are being made,
the executive is prohibited from engaging in the oil and gas
business in an area within a ten mile radius of the boundaries
of any property interest of Predecessor Resolute. Upon the
consummation of the Resolute Transaction, these agreements
became agreements of Resolute. The following table illustrates
the amounts that would be payable to the executive officers
assuming that (i) the executive officer was terminated as
of December 31, 2009, and (ii) Resolute elected to
make the severance payments for the full eighteen month period.
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Total Severance
Payment
|
|
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
James M. Piccone
|
|
$
|
525,000
|
|
Richard F. Betz
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
Dale E. Cantwell
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
Theodore Gazulis
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
Janet W. Pasque
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
24
On May 7, 2010, the Board granted restricted stock to
certain of the Named Executive Officers. The restricted stock
was granted under the 2009 Performance Incentive Plan, which
provides that upon the occurrence of certain Change of Control
Events, restricted stock will become fully vested. See
Compensation Discussion and AnalysisLong Term
Incentive Compensation for a description of the restricted
stock grants to Named Executive Officers.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis of the Company
The Company began operations on September 25, 2009, and the
Board of Directors and Compensation Committee assumed their
positions at that date. Prior to that date, the Company was not
a public company, and compensation decisions were made by the
managing members of Predecessor Resolute.
Overview of the Companys Compensation
Program. The Companys Board of Directors has
responsibility for establishing, implementing and continually
monitoring adherence with the Companys compensation
philosophy. The Board of Directors has delegated to the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors its
responsibilities with respect to development of a compensation
program and implementation of that program. The Compensation
Committee will be solely responsible for determining the
compensation of the CEO and will make recommendations to the
Board of Directors regarding the compensation of other executive
officers. It will also administer equity incentive plans, and
make recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding awards
under the Incentive Plan. Generally, the types of compensation
and benefits that are provided to the Companys executive
officers are similar to those provided to the Companys
other officers and employees. The Company does not have
compensation plans that are solely for executive officers. Those
officers whose compensation elements and amounts are
specifically listed in the Companys proxy statement are
referred to in this discussion as the Named Executive
Officers.
The CEO plays a key role in determining executive compensation
for the other Named Executive Officers and other officers. The
CEO attends the meetings of the Compensation Committee at which
executive compensation is being discussed and makes
recommendations to the Committee. In arriving at his
recommendations, the CEO evaluates the performance of each
executive and solicits input from the peers of such executives
and others, if necessary. This evaluation is shared with the
Committee and forms the basis for the recommendation. These
recommendations are considered by the Compensation Committee,
along with other relevant data, in determining the base salary,
annual cash incentives, long-term equity incentives, and
benefits and perquisites for such executives.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives. The Company
believes that the most effective compensation program is one
that is designed to reward all employees, not just executives,
for the achievement of the Companys short-term and
long-term strategic goals. As a result, the Companys
compensation philosophy is to provide all employees (except
those covered by union contracts that limit the Companys
flexibility in matters related to compensation), with cash
incentives or a combination of cash and equity-based incentives
that foster the continued growth and overall success of the
Company and encourage employees to maximize stockholder value.
Under this philosophy, all Company employees (with the exception
noted above), have aligned interests. When establishing its
total compensation, the Company has the following objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
To attract, retain and motivate highly qualified and experienced
individuals;
|
|
|
|
To provide financial incentives, through an appropriate mix of
fixed and variable pay components, to achieve the
organizations key financial and operational objectives;
|
|
|
|
To ensure that a portion of total compensation is at
risk in the form of equity compensation; and
|
|
|
|
To offer competitive compensation packages that are consistent
with the Companys core values, including the balance of
fairness to the individual and the organization, and the demand
for commitment and dedication in the performance of the job.
|
25
It is the Committees policy to provide incentives that
promote both our short term and long term financial objectives
that are appropriate to the nature of our assets. Base salary
and short term incentive compensation are designed to reward
achievement of short term objectives, while the long term
incentive compensation is intended to encourage employees,
particularly executives, to focus on our long term goals.
Salary, annual cash bonuses and equity awards are the primary
components of our compensation program and we believe that
attention to all three elements is important to retain our
existing personnel and to attract and hire new employees. As to
any given individual, the factors considered in any compensation
decision include, but are not limited to, the complexity of that
individuals job, the persons dedication and
demonstrated contributions to our value, competitive pressures
in the marketplace and his or her relative performance compared
to peers within the Company.
We consider an inability to attract or retain qualified
motivated employees as a significant risk for the Company as we
operate in a highly competitive industry. In approving elements
of the compensation program, the Compensation Committee and the
Board prefer a balancing of factors, so that no single
performance metric becomes an overriding influence. For that
reason, the incentive compensation program described below
balances a number of metrics. Our Long Term Incentive Program,
also described below, provides for vesting over a four year
period in order to mitigate against a short term focus at the
expense of long-term results by our senior executives, including
the Named Executive Officers.
Role of Compensation Consultant. The Compensation
Committee, which has sole authority to retain and terminate any
compensation consulting firm, independently retains a
compensation consultant to assist in deliberations regarding
executive compensation. In February 2010 the Compensation
Committee engaged Effective Compensation, Inc.
(ECI), an independent compensation consultant, to
advise with respect to development of a comprehensive
compensation philosophy and practices for executives and other
employees. The Committee sought advice from ECI regarding base
salary, annual bonus, the nature and amount of long-term
incentives, performance measures for short-term and long-term
incentives, identification of representative peer groups and
general market data. ECI evaluated our executive compensation
and recommended continued focus on total direct compensation as
a means to achieve the compensation objectives outlined above
while remaining competitive with the external market.
In February 2010, ECI provided the Committee with a selection of
possible peer companies for discussion purposes for use as part
of its compensation evaluation process. These companies were
selected based on their size, as measured by market
capitalization, and an assessment that they are reasonably
comparable to the Company in terms of business scope and
objectives in the upstream oil and gas segment. The following
companies comprise the peer group jointly selected by ECI and
the Committee and utilized by the Committee:
|
|
|
Berry Petroleum Company
|
|
Petroleum Development Corporation
|
Bill Barrett Corporation
|
|
PetroQuest Energy Inc.
|
Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc.
|
|
St. Mary Land & Exploration Company
|
Comstock Resources, Inc.
|
|
Stone Energy Company
|
Mariner Energy, Inc.
|
|
Swift Energy Company
|
Penn Virginia Corporation
|
|
|
The Compensation Committee may make modifications to the peer
group from time to time due to consolidations within, and to
accommodate new companies entering, the oil and gas exploration
and production industry, or for other reasons. The Committee
will continue to monitor the appropriateness of the peer group
and the relative measures drawn from the process with the
primary objective of utilizing a peer group that provides the
most appropriate comparison to the Company to assist in
formulating compensation that maintains the Companys
ability to compete for top executives. The Compensation
Committee does not formally benchmark the
compensation of our executive officers against the compensation
of executives in the peer group.
Setting the Companys Executive
Compensation. Executive compensation is reviewed by the
26
Compensation Committee no less frequently than annually.
Compensation is expected to be based on the foregoing
objectives, and to include as integral components base salary
and annual and long-term incentive-based cash and non-cash
compensation. In performing its compensation reviews and making
its compensation decisions regarding the compensation of the
Companys chief executive officer and other executive
officers, the Compensation Committee will conduct an ongoing
review of compensation data from the peer group.
In establishing executive compensation, base salaries are
expected to be targeted near the midpoint of a range established
by this peer review, although adjustments are made for such
things as experience, market factors or exceptional performance,
among others, and potential total compensation, including annual
incentive compensation, are expected to be at the upper range of
total compensation at comparable companies if performance
targets are met. Annual cash incentive and equity incentive
awards will be designed to reflect progress toward company-wide
financial goals and personal objectives, as well as salary grade
level, and to balance rewards for short-term and long-term
performance.
Long-term incentive compensation will be used to reward and to
encourage long-term performance and an alignment of interests
between the individual and the organization. Long-term incentive
grants will be used not only to reward prior performance, but
also to retain executive officers and other employees and
provide incentives for future exceptional performance. To the
extent that business success makes long-term incentive awards
more valuable, an individuals total compensation may move
from the median to the high end of ranges established with
reference to peer data.
In determining the allocation between cash short-term and
non-cash long-term incentive compensation for executive
officers, the Compensation Committee engages in an individual
analysis for each executive. Factors affecting compensation
include:
(i) The Companys annual performance;
(ii) Impact of the employees performance on the
Companys results;
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
The Companys objective to provide total compensation that
is higher than competitive levels when aggressive goals of the
Company are exceeded; and
|
(iv) Internal equity.
The Committee also takes into consideration the fact that,
although our officers are responsible for specific business
functions, together they share responsibility for the
performance of the Company. As we seek to attract and retain the
best talent available, we also wish to have employees view
employment at the Company as a career decision. It takes a long
period of time and a significant investment to develop the
experienced executive talent necessary to succeed in the oil and
gas business; senior executives must have experience with all
phases of the business cycle to be effective leaders. We have an
experienced executive team that has been in the oil and gas
industry for thirty years or more, and we believe that our
future success will be enhanced by retaining these experienced
employees through our compensation philosophy and practices.
We believe that the proportion of total compensation that is
performance-based, and therefore at risk, should
increase with an individuals level of responsibility.
Therefore, long-term incentive compensation grants will
typically represent a larger proportion of the total
compensation package as the level of responsibility of the
executive increases. For the chief executive officer, long term
incentive grants are typically the largest element of the total
compensation package. Executive officers generally receive the
same benefits as other employees, although not necessarily in
the same mix or amounts.
Executive Compensation Components. The principal
components of compensation for executive officers are:
27
|
|
|
|
|
Cash bonus;
|
|
|
|
Long-term incentive compensation; and,
|
|
|
|
401(k) and other benefits.
|
Relative Size of Major Compensation Elements. The
combination of base salary, annual cash incentives and equity
awards comprises total direct compensation. In setting executive
compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the aggregate
compensation payable to an executive officer and the form of
that compensation. The Compensation Committee seeks to achieve
the appropriate balance between immediate cash rewards and
long-term financial incentives for the achievement of both
annual and long-term financial and non-financial objectives. The
Compensation Committee may decide, as appropriate, to modify the
mix of base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity
incentives to best fit an executive officers specific
circumstances. For example, the Compensation Committee may make
the decision to award more cash and not award an equity grant.
The Compensation Committee may also increase the size of equity
grants to an executive officer if the total number of career
equity grants does not adequately reflect the executives
current position with the Company.
Timing of Compensation Decisions. It is expected
that all elements of the executive officers compensation
will be reviewed each February, including a review of financial,
operating and personal objectives with respect to the prior
years results. At that time, the financial, operating and
personal objectives and performance targets will be determined
for the current year. The Board of Directors or the Compensation
Committee may, however, review salaries or grant equity
incentives at other times in connection with new appointments or
promotions or other extraordinary events that occur during the
year, or under other circumstances that it deems appropriate.
Base Salary. The Company provides executive officers
with a base salary to compensate them for services rendered
during the fiscal year. Base salaries for executive officers are
based upon each individuals responsibilities, experience
and performance, taking into account among other things, the
individuals initiative, contribution to our overall
performance, managerial ability and handling of special
projects. These same factors are applied to establish base
salaries for other key management employees. The Compensation
Committees evaluation of each executive officers
performance is subjective; no specific written criteria or
formulas, and no pre-determined targets, are used in determining
base salary. The factors considered in compensation decisions
are not weighted, but are viewed collectively. Base salaries for
executive officers generally are reviewed annually for possible
adjustment, but are not necessarily changed each year. The
Committee is responsible for determining the base salary for the
Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Executive Officer
recommends the base salary for the other executive officers.
Other executive officers recommend the base salary for all
employees that are in the executive officers area of
responsibility. The Chief Executive Officer, the President and
the Chief Financial Officer review the recommendations for
salaries and bonuses for all other employees and adjust them as
they deem appropriate. The Compensation Committee reviews the
recommendations for all employees from the Chief Executive
Officer and approves them or adjusts them as it deems
appropriate.
Base salaries for each of the Named Executive Officers were
reset in the fall of 2009 following the consummation of the
Resolute Transaction, as follows: base salary levels for
Messrs. Betz, Cantwell and Gazulis and Ms. Pasque were
set at $300,000, for Mr. Piccone at $350,000, and for
Mr. Sutton at $500,000. This decision reflected increased
responsibilities associated with public company status, as well
as other factors. The Compensation Committee reviewed survey
data compiled by a third party of publicly available information
of salary levels for executives at companies in the oil and gas
industry with a market capitalization comparable to that of the
Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee considered the
then current salary levels of executives. Prior to the Resolute
Transaction in 2009, all Named Executive Officers had been
executive officers of Resolute Holdings. Each executive had an
annual salary of $175,000 per year, which reflected private
company salary, and equity arrangements for a
start-up
company that were no longer applicable to a much larger, public
company. Salaries had been unchanged since 2004, and these
levels were not considered competitive with market rates. In
addition, executives had foregone salary increases and
28
had agreed to salary reductions in 2009 from agreed levels in
response to reduced cash flow of Resolute Holdings due to
significantly lower oil and gas product prices during that
period of time.
For 2010, the Committee concluded that the wage adjustments made
effective in September 2009 would remain in place without
further change. Absent unusual circumstances, base salaries will
be reviewed again in early 2011.
Cash Bonus. Annual cash bonuses will be
performance-based and are intended to promote achievement of our
business objectives of increasing stockholder value. All
eligible employees participate in an annual bonus plan with the
same performance objectives as those used for executive
officers. The annual bonus awards for 2011 and thereafter are
also intended to assist executives in meeting income tax
obligations associated with vesting of restricted stock, which
is a significant component of the executives compensation,
so that executives are not forced to sell their stock to meet
tax obligations and are able to maintain their equity positions
in the Company.
Cash bonuses to executive officers will be made at the direction
of the Board of Directors. Cash bonuses totaling $578,055 were
awarded in December 2009 to the Named Executive Officers for
services during 2009. Each bonus was equal to approximately one
quarter of each executives annual salary at year-end 2009,
subject to certain adjustments and special considerations.
Mr. Sutton received a bonus of $138,100, Mr. Piccone a
bonus of $100,600, Messrs. Gazulis and Cantwell and
Ms. Pasque each received bonuses of $88,100, and
Mr. Betz received a bonus of $75,000. Factors considered in
awarding this bonus included the exemplary efforts made by such
executives in completing the Resolute Transaction and in
transitioning to public company status. In addition, the bonuses
took into consideration the salary reductions agreed to by the
executives in 2009: Mr. Sutton had agreed to a 50%
reduction in his salary from February 2009 and other executives
had agreed to a 10% reduction in salary from April 2009. The
Committee also considered, in determining the amount of the
bonuses, that the Companys normal policy of matching
employee 401(k) contributions had been suspended in 2009 (with
respect to 2008 contributions) and that Named Executive Officers
received no bonus in 2009 for services in 2008.
Similar to base salaries, the Committee is responsible for
determining the bonus for the Chief Executive Officer, and the
Chief Executive Officer recommends the annual bonus for each
other executive officer. Other executive officers recommend the
annual bonus for all employees that are in that executive
officers area of responsibility. The Chief Executive
Officer, the President and the Chief Financial Officer review
the recommendations for bonuses for all other employees and
adjust them as they deem appropriate. The Compensation Committee
reviews the recommendations for all executives from the Chief
Executive Officer and approves them or adjusts them as it deems
appropriate.
The Committee expects that future year-end cash bonuses would
range from 0% to 150% of each executives annual base
salary, depending on an executives position of
responsibility. Bonuses will reflect the Committees
assessment of whether performance goals established for the
executives have been achieved. Another important factor to be
considered is the income tax liability that our executive
officers will incur upon the vesting of restricted stock grants
in 2011 and thereafter, as it is expected that required tax
withholdings on vesting will in some cases equal or exceed an
executives annual bonus. The payment of bonuses adequate
to cover tax costs encourages executives to retain their vested
shares.
For 2010, the Committee implemented a program that set bonus
targets, which are a percentage of base salary, for the senior
executives and decided which performance metrics would be used
to determine whether bonus awards will be less than (the
threshold level), equal to or greater than (the
stretch level) the target percentage. The target
awards for our Named Executive Officers, as a percentage of each
executives base salary, are as follows: CEO100%,
President85%, Senior Vice Presidents70%, other
officers50%. Threshold levels are 50% below target and
stretch levels are 50% above target.
The Committee will establish a bonus pool equal to each eligible
employees target bonus percentage multiplied by that
employees base salary (the Bonus Pool). Fifty
percent of the Bonus Pool will be allocated to the
Performance Metrics Pool. The Performance Metrics
Pool may be increased or decreased depending
29
on how the Company has performed as measured against certain
pre-established parameters. In determining which performance
metrics to use to in evaluating this portion of bonus awards,
the Committee concluded that short-term incentive compensation
should be based on achievement of operational objectives rather
than measures such as total shareholder return that can be
greatly influenced by factors outside of any individuals
influence or control. Longer term performance metrics are more
appropriate for the long-term incentive plan. For 2010, the
Committee will utilize three key performance metrics:
Production, Lease Operating Expense, and General and
Administrative Expense.
Although the Committee did not identify specific levels of these
metrics that would trigger the threshold, target and stretch
bonus payments, performance criteria for the target bonus are
generally at the midpoint of the range of our public guidance,
with the threshold and stretch bonuses being payable for
performance that is less than or exceeds those expectations. In
some cases, performance metrics may be adjusted during the year
based on changes in our business, such as increased costs or
commodity prices or as a result of an acquisition or
disposition. Performance that would qualify for bonuses at the
threshold level is expected in normal operating circumstances.
Performance satisfying the criteria for bonuses at the target
level is believed to be achievable with additional effort.
Performance that would qualify for bonuses at the stretch level
is believed to be achievable with extraordinary efforts.
A fourth metric that will be used in the determination of the
size of the Performance Metric Pool is the Companys
success in advancing its capital and strategic projects on time
and on budget. The Committee has identified several key
initiatives that will be evaluated as part of this metric,
including Aneth Phase IV
CO2,
Aneth gas plant construction engineering, Aneth compression
reconfiguration, and execution of plans to drill wells in the
Williston Basin.
Generally the Performance Metric Pool will be divided among
eligible participants on a formulaic prorata basis, although the
Committee reserves the ability to adjust individual
participants awards as the result of extraordinary
individual contribution or lack thereof.
The other fifty percent of the Bonus Pool will be increased or
decreased and allocated according to managements and the
Committees assessment of individual and group performance
measured against defined goals and objectives. This portion of
the bonus determination is more subjective than the performance
metrics described above, which are inherently more formulaic,
but the Committee believes that motivating and rewarding
superior performance is not a matter of one size fits
all. Effective discretion in this regard is a significant
component of good management.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The Company
adopted the 2009 Performance Incentive Plan (the Incentive
Plan) in July 2009, and the Incentive Plan was approved by
the sole stockholder of the Company at that time. The maximum
number of shares of Company Common Stock that may be issued
pursuant to awards under the Incentive Plan is 2,657,744. No
awards were made in 2009.
The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to promote the success of
the Company and the interests of its stockholders by providing
an additional means for the Company to attract, motivate, retain
and reward directors, officers, employees and other eligible
persons (including consultants and advisors) through the grant
of incentive awards. Equity-based awards are also intended to
further align the interests of award recipients and the
Companys stockholders. In particular, long term incentive
compensation is awarded to employees who are important for us to
retain to accomplish our strategic goals over the longer term.
As with base salary and short term incentive compensation, the
long term awards granted to each recipient are determined by
several factors. These factors include our need to retain a
specific employee, the employees performance, the
employees ability to add value to our enterprise and the
compensation data of our peer group.
On May 5, 2010, the Compensation Committee met for the
purpose of determining and approving awards of restricted stock
for certain of the Named Executive Officers and other employees.
In evaluating 2010 LTI awards, the Committee reviewed and
considered peer group data as well as other survey data
presented by ECI. However, the Committee initially considered
that, since no awards had been made under the Incentive Plan,
the goal of motivating employees to contribute to the long-term
growth of the Company and
30
participating fully in that growth through equity participation
was not being met. Because the Company only became a public
reporting company in September 2009, it was required to
completely restructure the equity compensation component of
compensation, starting with a clean-slate. Accordingly, the
Committee considered that it was not appropriate to base its
grants on those of peer companies that have been public for
longer periods and have long-standing practices of annual equity
incentive grants with vesting provisions that have built
significant retention value over time. Of concern to the
Committee was that the entire management team could leave the
Company for higher financial benefits offered by other industry
participants and suffer no economic detriment in terms of
foregone equity compensation. This asymmetry of risk and reward
was not, in the Committees view, in the best long-term
interest of our shareholders. As a result, the Committee
concluded that the initial grants under the long-term incentive
program should be structured to build significant equity
incentives for the executives, comparable to the positions they
would have been in had the long-term incentive plan been
implemented approximately two years ago. This conclusion
impacted both the size of the grants and the vesting periods. In
setting the number of shares subject to the grants, the
Committee established an aggregate pool of approximately
1,600,000 shares, approximately 500,000 of which were
allocated to non-NEOs. This allocation to non-NEOs is
approximately double what the Committee expects would be
allocated in periods following the initial grant and is intended
to accommodate the preload discussed above. The allocations were
further adjusted in individual cases based on the
recommendations of management. The remaining
1,100,000 shares allocated to NEOs is approximately 1.5
times what the Committee expects would be allocated in periods
following the initial grant, again with the intention of
accommodating the preload consideration. The Committee awarded
Mr. Sutton 450,000 shares of restricted stock, and
recommended to the Board awards to Mr. Piccone of
275,000 shares of restricted stock, and to Mr. Gazulis
and Mr. Betz awards of 200,000 shares of restricted
stock each. Mr. Cantwell and Ms. Pasque have notified
the Company that they intend to leave the Company; thus no award
was made to them.
Shares of restricted stock are subject to forfeiture and vest if
executives continue to be employed at specified dates in the
future, and if certain performance metrics are satisfied. For
2010, two-thirds of each grant of restricted stock is
time-based, as the shares will vest based on continued
employment in four equal tranches. The first tranche will vest
on December 31, 2010. The remaining tranches will vest on
each successive December 31st, with the final tranche
vesting on December 31, 2013. The remaining one-third of
each grant is subject to the satisfaction of pre-established
performance targets. The performance-based shares will vest in
equal tranches on the same dates if there has been a 10% annual
appreciation in the trading price of the Companys common
stock, compounded annually, from the twenty trading day average
stock price at December 31, 2009. At the end of each year,
the twenty trading day average share price will be measured, and
if the 10% threshold is met, the stock subject to the
performance criteria will vest. If the 10% threshold is not met,
shares that have not vested will roll to the following year. In
that way, an underperforming year can be offset by an
over-performing year. At December 31, 2013, any unvested
shares will vest if the cumulative test is met or will be
forfeited if the test is not met. The Committee believes that
this plan emphasizes long-term, multi-year performance and value
creation.
Vesting will accelerate on an individuals death or
disability or, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee,
on certain change of control events.
Employment Agreements. The Company expects to enter
into employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers in
2010. It is expected that the employment agreements will provide
for (i) base salary, (ii) bonuses to be earned by
achievement of specified performance targets,
(iii) severance and change of control benefits,
(iv) non-competition and non-solicitation provisions,
(v) obligations to maintain the confidentiality of the
Company information, and (vi) assignment of all
intellectual property rights to the Company.
Retirement and Other Benefit Plans. All of the
Companys employees will be eligible to participate in a
401(k) plan. While the Company will have the option but not the
requirement to match all or a portion of employee contributions
to the 401(k) plan, a matching contribution was made in 2010 for
2009 contributions.
Other Benefits Plans. The Company offers a variety
of health and benefit programs to all employees, including
medical, dental, vision, life insurance and disability
insurance. The Companys executive officers are
31
generally eligible to participate in these employee benefit
plans on the same basis as the rest of the Companys
employees.
Compensation Programs and Potential of Risks. The
Committee and Board have determined that the risks arising from
its compensation policies and practices are not reasonably
likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Tax Deductibility of
Compensation. Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally limits the corporate
income tax deduction for compensation paid to the principal
executive officer and each other executive officer shown in the
summary compensation table in the proxy statement to
$1 million, unless the compensation is
performance-based compensation and qualifies under
certain other exceptions. Our policy is primarily to design and
administer compensation plans which support the achievement of
long-term strategic objectives and enhance shareholder value.
Where it is consistent with our compensation philosophy, the
Compensation Committee will also attempt to structure
compensation programs that are tax-advantageous to us.
Change in Executive Officers. On May 7, 2010,
the Company announced that Janet W. Pasque and Dale E. Cantwell
will each retire from the Company effective as of May 31,
2010. The Company and each of Ms. Pasque and
Mr. Cantwell will enter into a consulting agreement under
which Ms. Pasque will serve as a consultant to the Company
from June 1, 2010 until December 31, 2010 and
Mr. Cantwell will serve as a consultant to the Company from
June 1, 2010 for a period of up to one year.
Mr. Cantwell will consult on capital projects, principally
in Aneth Field.
On May 7, 2010, the Company also announced that the Board
of Directors had appointed other persons to vice president
positions, effective June 1, 2010. Two of these
appointments will be executive officers: James A. Tuell, who has
been Interim Chief Accounting Officer, will become a Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer; and Bobby D.
Brady, Jr. will become Vice President, Operations. In
addition, William R. Alleman will become Vice President, Land;
M. David Clouatre will become Vice President, Reservoir
Engineering; Patrick E. Flynn will become Vice President,
Governmental and Corporate Affairs; Bret R. Siepman will become
Vice President, Geology and Geophysics. Mr. Tuell was a
consultant for the Company and each of the other newly appointed
Vice Presidents was an employee of the Company prior to such
appointment.
Director Summary Compensation Table. The following
table summarizes the compensation we paid to our non-employee
directors between September 25, 2009, the date the Company
became a public reporting company, and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
and Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Paid
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Kenneth A. Hersh
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
Richard L. Covington
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
William J. Quinn
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
William H. Cunningham
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
Robert M. Swartz
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
James E. Duffy
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
Thomas O. Hicks, Jr.
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
Messrs. Sutton and Piccone are not included in this table
because as employees of the Company they receive no additional
compensation for their services as directors. The compensation
received by Messrs. Sutton and Piccone as employees is
shown in Executive Officer Compensation in
2009Summary Compensation Table.
On December 14, 2009, the Compensation Committee
recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, the following
annual compensation for non-employee directors: annual retainer
of $50,000, fees of $2,000 for each Board of Directors meeting
and $1,000 for each Committee meeting, and additional
compensation of $7,500 for each Committee chairman and for Lead
Independent Director. In addition, non-
32
employee directors would receive equity compensation, in a form
to be determined by the Compensation Committee, having a value
of $50,000 annually. The cash fees appearing in the above table
reflects this compensation arrangement with respect to cash
compensation paid for 2009. While the Board of Directors
authorized the directors to receive equity compensation for
services as a director for the period from September 25,
2009, to December 31, 2009, the form and terms of any such
equity compensation were subject to analysis of legal, tax and
other factors and had not been determined by the end of 2009. As
a result, no awards were made in 2009, but awards of
1,373 shares of restricted stock were made to directors
Swartz, Duffy, Hicks and Cunningham on March 16, 2010, with
respect to 2009 services. If such grants had been included in
the Director Compensation Table, the column Stock Awards would
have reflected $16,503 for each such director. The amount that
would have been included in the table does not reflect
compensation actually received by such directors or the actual
value that may be recognized with respect to the awards in the
future. Rather, it reflects the grant date fair value of the
award, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, which
does not take into account future vesting contingencies. Of the
total award, 343 shares vested upon grant, 343 shares
will vest on the first and second anniversaries of the date of
grant, and 344 shares will vest on the third anniversary of
the date of grant. Vesting is subject to the continued service
of the director on the vesting date. See Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
Messrs. Hersh, Covington and Quinn waived their director
compensation made through the issuance of common stock on
March 16, 2010. However, on May 7, 2010, each of such
persons was awarded 1,373 stock appreciation rights in respect
of their services as director for the period from
September 25, 2009, through December 31, 2009. Cash
payments will be based on the difference between the closing
price of the common stock on the vesting date of the stock
appreciation rights and $12.40, the closing price of the common
stock on May 7, 2010. Stock appreciation rights will vest
on March 16, 2011 (with respect to 457 stock appreciation
rights) and March 16, 2012 and 2013 (with respect to 458
stock appreciation rights). Stock appreciation rights will be
deemed exercised upon vesting. If such grants had been included
in the Director Compensation Table, the column Stock Awards
would have reflected $17,025 for each such director. The amount
that would have been included in the table does not reflect
compensation actually received by such directors or the actual
value that may be recognized with respect to the awards in the
future. Rather, it reflects the grant date fair value of the
award, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, which
does not take into account future vesting contingencies.
In addition, each director will be reimbursed for his or her
out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of
the Board of Directors or Committees. Each director is covered
by a liability insurance policy paid for by the Company and is
indemnified, to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law,
by the Company for his or her actions associated with being a
director. The Company entered into indemnification agreements
with each of its directors.
Compensation Committee Report. We, the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors, have reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the management of the
Company, and, based on such review and discussion, have
recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Compensation Committee:
James E. Duffy, Chairman
Richard L. Covington
Kenneth A. Hersh
William J. Quinn
33
The Company adopted the 2009 Performance Incentive Plan (the
Incentive Plan) in July 2009, and the Incentive Plan
was approved by the sole stockholder of the Company at that
time. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text
of the Incentive Plan.
Purpose. The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to
promote the success of the Company and the interests of its
stockholders by providing an additional means for the Company to
attract, motivate, retain and reward directors, officers,
employees and other eligible persons (including consultants and
advisors) through the grant of awards and incentives for high
levels of individual performance and improved financial
performance of the Company. Equity-based awards are also
intended to further align the interests of award recipients and
the Companys stockholders.
Administration. The Companys Board of
Directors or one or more committees consisting of independent
directors appointed by the Companys Board of Directors
will administer the Incentive Plan. Our Board of Directors has
delegated general administrative authority for the Incentive
Plan to the compensation committee, which is comprised of
directors who qualify as independent under rules promulgated by
the SEC and The New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
Except with respect to grants to non-employee directors, a
committee may delegate some or all of its authority with respect
to the Incentive Plan to another committee of directors and
certain limited authority to grant awards to employees may be
delegated to one or more officers of the Company. For purposes
of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code),
Rule 16b-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the rules of
the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and for grants to
non-employee directors, the Incentive Plan must be administered
by a committee consisting solely of independent directors. The
appropriate acting body, be it the Companys Board of
Directors, a committee within its delegated authority, or an
officer within his or her delegated authority, is referred to in
this plan description as the Administrator.
The Administrator has broad authority under the Incentive Plan
with respect to award grants including, without limitation, the
authority:
|
|
|
|
|
to select participants and determine the type(s) of award(s)
that they are to receive;
|
|
|
|
to determine the number of shares that are to be subject to
awards and the terms and conditions of awards, including the
price (if any) to be paid for the shares or the award;
|
|
|
|
to cancel, modify, or waive the Companys rights with
respect to, or modify, discontinue, suspend, or terminate any or
all outstanding awards, subject to any required consents;
|
|
|
|
to accelerate or extend the vesting or exercisability or extend
the term of any or all outstanding awards subject to any
required consent;
|
|
|
|
subject to the other provisions of the Incentive Plan, to make
certain adjustments to an outstanding award and to authorize the
conversion, succession or substitution of an award;
|
|
|
|
|
|
to allow the purchase price of an award or shares of Company
Common Stock to be paid in the form of cash, check, or
electronic funds transfer, by the delivery of already-owned
shares of Company Common Stock or by a reduction of the number
of shares deliverable pursuant to the award, by services
rendered by the recipient of the award, by notice of third party
payment or by cashless exercise, on such terms as the
Administrator may authorize, or any other form permitted by law.
|
Eligibility. Persons eligible to receive awards
under the Incentive Plan include officers and employees of the
Company or any of its subsidiaries, directors of the Company,
and certain consultants and advisors to the Company or any of
its subsidiaries.
Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of
Company Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to awards under
the Incentive Plan is 2,657,744. No awards were made in 2009.
The Incentive Plan generally provides that shares issued in
connection with awards that are granted by or become obligations
of
34
the Company through the assumption of awards (or in substitution
for awards) in connection with an acquisition of another Company
will not count against the shares available for issuance under
the Incentive Plan.
No Repricing. In no case (except due to an
adjustment to reflect a stock split or similar event or any
repricing that may be approved by stockholders) will any
adjustment be made to a stock option or stock appreciation right
award under the Incentive Plan (by amendment, cancellation and
regrant, exchange or other means) that would constitute a
repricing of the per share exercise or base price of the award.
Types of Awards. The Incentive Plan authorizes stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted
stock units, stock bonuses and other forms of awards that may be
granted or denominated in Company Common Stock or units of
Company Common Stock, as well as cash bonus awards. The
Incentive Plan retains flexibility to offer competitive
incentives and to tailor benefits to specific needs and
circumstances. Any award may be paid or settled in cash.
Stock Options. A stock option is the right to
purchase shares of Company Common Stock at a future date at a
specified price per share (the exercise price.) The
per share exercise price of an option generally may not be less
than the fair market value of a share of Company Common Stock on
the date of grant. The maximum term of an option is ten years
from the date of grant. An option may be either an incentive
stock option or a nonqualified stock option. Incentive stock
options are taxed differently than nonqualified stock options
and are subject to more restrictive terms under the Code and the
Incentive Plan. Incentive stock options may be granted only to
employees of the Company or a subsidiary.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock appreciation
right is the right to receive payment of an amount equal to the
excess of the fair market value of shares of Company Common
Stock on the date of exercise of the stock appreciation right
over the base price of the stock appreciation right. The base
price will be established by the Administrator at the time of
grant of the stock appreciation right and generally cannot be
less than the fair market value of a share of Company Common
Stock on the date of grant. Stock appreciation rights may be
granted in connection with other awards or independently. The
maximum term of a stock appreciation right is ten years from the
date of grant.
Restricted Stock. Shares of restricted stock are
shares of Company Common Stock that are subject to certain
restrictions on sale, pledge, or other transfer by the recipient
during a particular period of time (the restricted
period). Subject to the restrictions provided in the
applicable award agreement and the Incentive Plan, a participant
receiving restricted stock may have all of the rights of a
stockholder as to such shares, including the right to vote and
the right to receive dividends.
Restricted Stock Units. A restricted stock unit
(RSU), represents the right to receive one share of
Company Common Stock on a specific future vesting or payment
date. Subject to the restrictions provided in the applicable
award agreement and the Incentive Plan, a participant receiving
RSUs has no stockholder rights until shares of common stock are
issued to the participant. RSUs may be granted with dividend
equivalent rights.
Cash Awards. The Administrator, in its sole
discretion, may grant cash awards, including without limitation,
discretionary awards, awards based on objective or subjective
performance criteria, and awards subject to other vesting
criteria.
Other Awards. The other types of awards that may be
granted under the Incentive Plan include, without limitation,
stock bonuses, performance stock, dividend equivalents, and
similar rights to purchase or acquire shares of Company Common
Stock.
Performance-Based Awards. The Administrator may
grant awards that are intended to be performance-based
compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the
Code (Performance-Based Awards). Performance-Based
Awards are in addition to any of the other types of awards that
may be granted under the Incentive Plan (including options and
stock appreciation rights which may also qualify as
performance-based
35
compensation for Section 162(m) purposes).
Performance-Based Awards may be in the form of restricted stock,
performance stock, stock units, other rights, or cash bonus
opportunities.
The vesting or payment of Performance-Based Awards (other than
options or stock appreciation rights) will depend on the
absolute or relative performance of the Company on a
consolidated, subsidiary, segment, division, or business unit
basis. The Administrator will establish the targets on which
performance will be measured based on criterion or criteria
selected by the Administrator. The Administrator must establish
criteria and targets in advance of applicable deadlines under
the Code and while the attainment of the performance targets
remains substantially uncertain. The Administrator may use any
criteria it deems appropriate for this purpose, and applicable
criteria may include one or more of the following: earnings per
share, cash flow (which means cash and cash equivalents derived
from either net cash flow from operations or net cash flow from
operating, financing and investing activities), total
stockholder return, gross revenue, revenue growth, operating
income (before or after taxes), net earnings (before or after
interest, taxes, depreciation
and/or
amortization), return on equity, capital employed, or on assets
or net investment, cost containment or reduction, operating
margin, debt reduction, finding and development costs,
production growth or production growth per share, reserve
replacement or reserve replacement per share or any combination
thereof. The performance measurement period with respect to an
award may be as short as three months to as long as ten years.
Performance targets will be adjusted to mitigate the unbudgeted
impact of material, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses,
accounting changes or other extraordinary events not foreseen at
the time the targets were set unless the Administrator provides
otherwise at the time of establishing the targets.
Performance-Based Awards may be paid in stock or in cash. Before
any Performance-Based Award (other than an option or stock
appreciation right) is paid, the Administrator must certify that
the performance target or targets have been satisfied. The
Administrator has discretion to determine the performance target
or targets and any other restrictions or other limitations of
Performance-Based Awards and may reserve discretion to reduce
payments below maximum award limits.
Acceleration of Awards; Possible Early Termination of
Awards. Generally, and subject to limited exceptions
set forth in the Incentive Plan, if any person acquires more
than 50% of the outstanding common stock or combined voting
power of the Company, if there are certain changes in a majority
of the Company Board of Directors, if stockholders prior to a
transaction do not continue to own more than 50% of the voting
securities of the Company (or a successor or a parent) following
a reorganization, merger, statutory share exchange or
consolidation or similar corporate transaction involving the
Company or any of its subsidiaries, a sale or other disposition
of all or substantially all of the Companys assets or the
acquisition of assets or stock of another entity by the Company
or any of its subsidiaries, or if the Company is dissolved or
liquidated, then awards then-outstanding under the Incentive
Plan may become fully vested or paid, as applicable, and may
terminate or be terminated upon consummation of such a change in
control event. The Administrator also has the discretion to
establish other change in control provisions with respect to
awards granted under the Incentive Plan. For example, the
Administrator could provide for the acceleration of vesting or
payment of an award in connection with a change in control event
that is not described above or provide that any such
acceleration shall be automatic upon the occurrence of any such
event.
Transfer Restrictions. Awards under the Incentive
Plan generally are not transferable by the recipient other than
by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or pursuant to
domestic relations orders, and are generally exercisable during
the recipients lifetime only by the recipient. Any amounts
payable or shares issuable pursuant to an award generally will
be paid only to the recipient or the recipients
beneficiary or representative. The Administrator has discretion,
however, to establish written conditions and procedures for the
transfer of awards to other persons or entities, as long as such
transfers comply with applicable federal and state securities
laws.
Adjustments. As is customary in incentive plans of
this nature, the share limit and the number and kind of shares
available under the Incentive Plan and any outstanding awards,
as well as the exercise or purchase prices of awards, and
performance targets under certain types of performance-based
awards, are subject to adjustment in the event of certain
reorganizations, mergers, combinations, recapitalizations, stock
36
splits, stock dividends, or other similar events that change the
number or kind of shares outstanding, and extraordinary
dividends or distributions of property to the stockholders.
No Limit on Other Authority. The Incentive Plan does
not limit the authority of the Companys Board of Directors
or any committee to grant awards or authorize any other
compensation, with or without reference to Company Common Stock,
under any other plan or authority.
Termination of, or Changes to, the Incentive
Plan. The Administrator may amend or terminate the
Incentive Plan at any time and in any manner. Stockholder
approval for an amendment will be required only to the extent
then required by applicable law or any applicable listing agency
or required under Sections 162, 409A, 422 or 424 of the
Code to preserve the intended tax consequences of the Incentive
Plan. For example, stockholder approval will be required for any
amendment that proposes to increase the maximum number of shares
that may be delivered with respect to awards granted under the
Incentive Plan. Adjustments as a result of stock splits or
similar events will not, however, be considered an amendment
requiring stockholder approval. Unless terminated earlier by the
Board of Directors, the authority to grant new awards under the
Incentive Plan will terminate ten years from the date of its
adoption, or July 31, 2019. Outstanding awards generally
will continue following the expiration or termination of the
Incentive Plan. Generally speaking, outstanding awards may be
amended by the Administrator (except for a repricing), but the
consent of the award holder is required if the amendment (or any
plan amendment) materially and adversely affects the holder.
Awards Under the Incentive Plan. No awards were made
under the Incentive Plan in 2009. Because future awards under
the Incentive Plan will be granted in the discretion of the
Companys Board of Directors or a committee of the board,
the type, number, recipients and other terms of future awards
cannot be determined at this time.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options
granted under our compensation plans as of December 31,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities to be issued
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
Number of securities remaining
|
|
|
upon exercise of outstanding
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
available for future issuance
|
Plan Category
|
|
options, warrants and rights
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
under equity compensation plans
|
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
2,657,744
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved by
security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
2,657,744
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Awards under the 2009 Performance
Incentive Plan may be made in the form of options, restricted
stock, restricted stock units or stock appreciation rights. At
December 31, 2009, no awards of any form had been granted.
|
No member of the compensation committee has been an officer or
employee of the Company. None of the Companys executive
officers serves as a member of the Board of Directors or the
compensation committee of any entity that has one or more
executive officers serving on the Companys Board of
Directors, or on the compensation committee of the
Companys Board of Directors.
Each of the executive officers entered into a Confidentiality
and Non-Competition Agreement (Confidentiality
Agreement) dated January 23, 2004, at the time of the
formation of Predecessor Resolute. In this agreement, each
officer agreed: (i) that all intellectual property
developed, and business opportunities
37
as to which such executive became aware, during his employment
belong to Predecessor Resolute, (ii) to maintain
confidentiality of proprietary information, and (iii) to
turn over to Predecessor Resolute all business records during,
and upon termination of, employment.
In addition, as discussed above, Predecessor Resolute has the
right, in its sole discretion, to agree to make severance
payments to any executive officer for up to eighteen months
following termination other than for Cause (as defined), or upon
voluntary resignation following a reduction in annual salary.
Severance payments would be equal to the executives salary
immediately prior to termination. During the period in which
severance payments are being made, the executive may not engage
in the oil and gas business in an area within a ten mile radius
of the boundaries of any property interest of Predecessor
Resolute (the Non-Compete). In addition, the
executive is subject to the Non-Compete, even if no severance is
paid, if the executive resigns other than following a salary
reduction, the executive is terminated for Cause, or the
executive has breached any material provision of the
Confidentiality Agreement. In addition, the executive is in all
events prohibited during the eighteen months following
termination from inducing any other employee of Predecessor
Resolute to terminate his employment or cease providing services
to Predecessor Resolute. Upon the consummation of the Resolute
Transaction, these agreements became agreements of Resolute.
38
TRANSACTIONS
WITH RELATED PERSONS
At the time of the closing of the Resolute Transaction,
$1.3 million was held in bank accounts of Predecessor
Resolute that represented payments received by Predecessor
Resolute with respect to a tax distribution payable to Resolute
Holdings. Following the Resolute Transaction, Resolute paid such
amounts to Resolute Holdings.
The Company has entered into agreements to indemnify its
directors and named executive officers. Under these agreements,
the Company is obligated to indemnify its directors and officers
to the fullest extent permitted under the Delaware General
Corporation Law for expenses, including attorneys fees,
judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by them in any
action or proceeding arising out of their services as a director
or officer. The Company believes that these agreements are
necessary in attracting and retaining qualified directors and
officers.
Pursuant to the Companys Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics, the Board of Directors will review and approve all
relationships and transactions in which it and its directors,
director nominees and executive officers and their immediate
family members, as well as holders of more than 5% of any class
of its voting securities and their family members, have a direct
or indirect material interest. In approving or rejecting such
proposed relationships and transactions, the Board of Directors
shall consider the relevant facts and circumstances available
and deemed relevant to this determination. The Company has
designated James M. Piccone as the compliance officer to
generally oversee compliance with the Code of Conduct.
39
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and
intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements
for proxy statements with respect to two or more stockholders
sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement
addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly
referred to as householding, potentially provides
extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for us.
Under this procedure, multiple stockholders who share the same
last name and address will receive only one copy of the annual
proxy materials, unless they notify us that they wish to
continue receiving multiple copies. We have undertaken
householding to reduce our printing costs and postage fees.
If you wish to opt-out of householding and continue to receive
multiple copies of the proxy materials at the same address, you
may do so at any time prior to thirty days before the mailing of
proxy materials, which will typically be mailed in April of each
year, by notifying us in writing at: Resolute Energy
Corporation, Attn: Shareholder Services, 1675 Broadway,
Suite 1950, Denver CO 80202, or by contacting us at
(303) 534-4600.
You also may request additional copies of the proxy materials by
notifying us in writing at the same address or contacting us at
(303) 534-4600,
and we will undertake to deliver such additional copies
promptly. If you share an address with another stockholder and
currently are receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials,
you may request householding by notifying us at the above
referenced address or telephone number.
The Company maintains a link to investor relations information
on its website, www.resoluteenergy.com, where it makes
available, free of charge, the Companys filings with the
SEC, including its annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, or Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after
the Company electronically files such material with, or
furnishes it to, the SEC. The Company also makes available on
its website copies of the charters of the Audit, Compensation
and Corporate Governance/Nominating Committees of the
Companys Board of Directors, its Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics, Audit Committee Whistleblower Policy, Stockholder
and Interested Parties Communication Policy and Corporate
Governance Guidelines. Stockholders may request a printed copy
of these governance materials or any exhibit to this report by
writing to the Secretary, Resolute Energy Corporation, 1675
Broadway, Suite 1950, Denver, Colorado 80202. You may also
read and copy any materials the Company files with the SEC at
the SECs Public Reference Room, which is located at
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the Public
Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that
contains the documents the Company files with the SEC. The
Companys website and the information contained on or
connected to its website is not incorporated by reference herein
and its web address is included as an inactive textual reference
only.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Nicholas J. Sutton
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Dated: May 10, 2010
40
ANNUAL MEETING OF RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
June 10, 2010 |
|
|
2:00 P.M. (Mountain Standard Time) |
|
|
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, 1550 Seventeenth Street,
Suite 500, Denver, CO 80202
See Voting Instructions on Reverse Side.
|
Please make your marks like this:
x Use dark black pencil or pen only
Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR the election of
Directors nominated in
Proposal 1 and FOR Proposal 2. |
Directors Recommend ê
For |
|
1: |
|
The election of three (3) Class I Directors for three-year terms. |
|
|
|
01 William H. Cunningham 03 William J. Quinn 02 James E. Duffy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote For |
|
Withhold Vote |
|
*Vote For |
|
All Nominees |
|
From All Nominees |
|
All Except |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*INSTRUCTIONS:
To withhold authority to vote for any
nominee, mark the Except box and write
the number(s) in the space provided to the right. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors |
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Recommend
ê |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2:
|
Ratification of appointment of KPMG LLP as
Resolute Energy Corporations independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2010. |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
For
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3:
|
The transaction of such other business as
may property come before the meeting or
any adjournment or postponements of the
meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To attend the meeting and vote your shares
in person, please mark this box.
Authorized Signatures - This section must be
completed for your Instructions to be executed. |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please
Sign Here |
|
|
|
Please
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please
Sign Here |
|
|
|
Please
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this proxy card. Executors, administrators,
attorneysinfact or trustees should give their full titles as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign
full corporate name and have a duly authorized officer sign, stating the title. If a partnership, please sign
in partnership name by an authorized person. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.
|
Annual Meeting of Resolute Energy Corporation
to be held on Thursday, June 10, 2010
for Holders as of April 19, 2010
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Resolute Energy Corporation.
VOTE BY:
|
|
|
INTERNET |
|
TELEPHONE |
|
|
|
|
|
Go To
www.proxypush.com/ren |
|
OR |
|
866-390-6226 |
Cast your vote online. |
|
|
Use any touch-tone telephone. |
View Meeting Documents. |
|
|
Have your Proxy Card ready. |
|
|
|
Follow the simple recorded instructions. |
MAIL
|
|
|
OR |
|
Mark, sign and date
your Proxy Card. |
|
|
Detach your Proxy
Card. |
|
|
Return your Proxy Card in the postage-paid envelope provided. |
All votes must be received by 5:00 P.M., Eastern Time, June 9, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROXY TABULATOR FOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 8016
CARY, NC 27512-9903 |
Revocable Proxy Resolute Energy Corporation
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
June 10, 2010 2:00 P.M. (Mountain Standard Time)
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints James M. Piccone and Nicholas J. Sutton, or either of them, with
full power of substitution, as Proxies of the undersigned, to represent and vote as designated
below all of the shares of common stock of Resolute Energy Corporation held of record by the
undersigned on April 19, 2010 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Thursday, June
10, 2010 at 2:00 p.m., MST, at the offices of Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, 1550 Seventeenth Street,
Suite 500, Denver, CO 80202, and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
This proxy authorizes each of the persons named above to vote at his discretion on any other matter
that may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. If this card
contains no specific voting instructions, the shares will be voted in accordance with the
recommendation of the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of Directors nominated in Proposal 1
and FOR Proposal 2.
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Resolute Energy Corporation. Please
sign and return this proxy in the enclosed pre-addressed envelope. The giving of a proxy will not
affect your right to vote in person if you attend the meeting.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted at the meeting in the manner directed herein by the
undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of
the Directors nominated in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposal 2.
This proxy confers discretionary authority in respect of matters not known or determined at the
time of the mailing of the notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to the undersigned.
The undersigned hereby acknowledge receipt of (a) the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, (b)
the Proxy Statement, and (c) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be
Held on June 10, 2010: The proxy statement, proxy card and the annual report to shareholders for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, are available at www.proxydocs.com/ren.
PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL YOUR PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
(CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE)