UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) May 8, 2009
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY
(Exact Name of Registrant
as Specified in Its Charter)
New
Jersey
(State or Other
Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
|
001-4802
|
|
22-0760120 |
|
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes,
New Jersey
|
|
07417-1880 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(201)
847-6800
(Registrants
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former
Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under
any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230425) |
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 8.01 Other Events.
As reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2009, the
Company has entered into a settlement agreement, subject to court approval, with
the direct purchaser plaintiffs in the matter of In re Hypodermic Products
Antitrust Litigation. On May 7, 2009, certain indirect purchaser plaintiffs in that
litigation, who are not parties to the settlement, filed a motion with the court seeking to enjoin the consummation of
that settlement agreement on the ground that, among other things, the court had
not yet ruled on the issue of which plaintiffs have direct purchaser standing. The
settlement requires court approval, as we previously noted, and the settlement
agreement expressly provides for the court to rule on the issue of direct purchaser
standing as a precondition to approval.