Amendment No.2 to Form F-1
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 15, 2005
Registration No. 333-129413
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
Form F-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Republic of The Marshall Islands |
|
4400 |
|
98-0454169 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
TK House, Bayside Executive Park
West Bay Street and Blake Road
P.O. Box AP-59212
Nassau, Commonwealth of the Bahamas
(242) 502-8820
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP
Attention: Leo Chang
and Daniel C. Rodgers
100 Park Avenue, 31st Floor
New York, New York 10017
(212) 922-2200
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
David Matheson
Chris Hall
Perkins Coie LLP
1120 N.W. Couch Street, 10th Floor
Portland, Oregon 97209
(503) 727-2000 |
|
Joshua Davidson
Laura Tyson
Baker Botts L.L.P.
910 Louisiana Street
Houston, TX 77002-4995
(713) 229-1234 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, please check the following
box. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The information
in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may
not sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is
not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any
jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
NOVEMBER 14, 2005
PROSPECTUS
4,000,000 Common Units
Representing Limited Partner Interests
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
$ per
common unit
We are
selling 4,000,000 common units. We have granted the
underwriters an option to purchase up to 600,000 additional
common units to cover over-allotments, if any.
We are a
Marshall Islands limited partnership formed by Teekay Shipping
Corporation as part of its strategy to expand its operations in
the liquefied natural gas (or LNG) marine transportation
sector. Holders of our common units are entitled to receive
distributions of available cash of $0.4125 per quarter, or
$1.65 on an annualized basis, before any distributions are paid
on our subordinated units. We will only make these distributions
to the extent we have sufficient cash from operations after
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses.
The common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange,
where they trade under the symbol TGP. On
November 11, 2005, the last reported sales price of our
common units on the New York Stock Exchange was $30.11.
Investing
in our common units involves risk. Please read Risk
Factors beginning on page 20.
These
risks include the following:
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to
pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our common units
following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees
and expenses. |
|
|
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain and
expand the operating capacity of our fleet, which reduces our
cash available for distribution. |
|
|
Our substantial debt levels may limit our ability to obtain
additional financing, pursue other business opportunities and
pay distributions to you. |
|
|
We derive a substantial majority of our revenues from a limited
number of customers, and the loss of any customer, time charter
or vessel could result in a significant loss of revenues and
cash flow. |
|
|
We depend on Teekay Shipping Corporation to assist us in
operating our business, competing in our markets and providing
interim financing for three new LNG carriers. |
|
|
Our growth depends on continued growth in demand for LNG and LNG
shipping. |
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates may engage in
competition with us. |
|
|
Our general partner and its affiliates have conflicts of
interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may permit them to
favor their own interests to your detriment. |
|
|
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot remove our
general partner without its consent. |
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our income
even if you do not receive any cash distributions from us. |
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Unit | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Public Offering Price
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting Discount
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (before expenses)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The
underwriters expect to deliver the common units on or
about ,
2005.
Citigroup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.G. Edwards
|
|
UBS Investment Bank |
|
Wachovia Securities |
|
Morgan Stanley |
|
|
Raymond James |
|
Deutsche Bank Securities |
|
|
DnB NOR Markets |
|
HSBC |
,
2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
v
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized any other person to provide you with different
information. If anyone provides you with different or
inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not,
and the underwriters are not, making an offer to sell these
securities in any jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not
permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in
this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front cover of
this prospectus only. Our business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.
vi
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. You should read the entire prospectus
carefully, including the historical and pro forma financial
statements and the notes to those financial statements. The
information presented in this prospectus assumes that the
underwriters over-allotment option is not exercised. You
should read Summary of Risk Factors and
Risk Factors for information about important factors
that you should consider before buying the common units. We
include a glossary of some of the terms used in this prospectus
in Appendix A. Unless otherwise indicated, all references
to dollars and $ in this prospectus are
to, and amounts are presented in, U.S. Dollars.
References in this prospectus to Teekay LNG
Partners, we, our, us
or similar terms when used for periods prior to our initial
public offering on May 10, 2005, refer to the assets of
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its subsidiaries that were
contributed to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. and its subsidiaries in
connection with the initial public offering. For periods after
May 10, 2005, those terms refer, depending on the context,
to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. and/or any one or more of its
subsidiaries. References in this prospectus to Teekay
Shipping Corporation refer to Teekay Shipping Corporation
and/or any one or more of its subsidiaries.
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
We are an international provider of liquefied natural gas (or
LNG) and crude oil marine transportation services. We
were formed in November 2004 by Teekay Shipping Corporation, the
worlds largest owner and operator of medium-sized crude
oil tankers, to expand its operations in the LNG shipping
sector. Our growth strategy focuses on expanding our fleet of
LNG carriers under long-term, fixed-rate charters. We view our
Suezmax tanker fleet primarily as a source of stable cash flow
as we expand our LNG operations. We seek to leverage the
expertise, relationships and reputation of Teekay Shipping
Corporation and its affiliates to pursue growth opportunities in
the LNG shipping sector. Teekay Shipping Corporation, which owns
and controls our general partner, will own a 66.9% limited
partner interest in us upon the closing of this offering.
Our fleet currently consists of four LNG carriers and five
Suezmax class crude oil tankers, all of which are double-hulled.
Our fleet is young, with an average age of approximately two
years for our LNG carriers and approximately three years for our
existing Suezmax tankers, compared to world averages of
13.4 years and 8.6 years, respectively, as of
October 1, 2005.
These vessels operate under long-term, fixed-rate time charters
with major energy and utility companies. The average remaining
term for these charters is approximately 20 years for our
LNG carriers and approximately 17 years for our Suezmax
tankers, subject, in certain circumstances, to termination or
vessel purchase rights.
Recent Developments
For the quarter ended September 30, 2005, we generated
voyage revenues of $34.8 million, net income of
$8.9 million and income before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, of
$26.7 million. Our results for the quarter include interest
expense of $14.4 million, interest income of
$5.6 million and a foreign currency exchange gain of
$1.3 million. During the quarter, we generated
$13.7 million of distributable cash flow. Teekay GP LLC,
our general partner, declared a cash distribution of
$0.4125 per unit ($1.65 per unit on an annualized
basis) for the quarter, representing a total cash distribution
of $12.8 million, which was paid on November 14, 2005
to all unitholders of record on November 9, 2005. Please
read Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Appendix B
for explanations of EBITDA and distributable cash flow and
reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial
measures.
1
|
|
|
Agreement to Purchase Three Suezmax Tankers |
We have agreed to purchase from Teekay Shipping Corporation,
upon the closing of this offering, three double-hulled Suezmax
crude oil tankers (the African Spirit, the Asian
Spirit and the European Spirit) for an aggregate
purchase price of $180 million. These vessels have an
average age of two years and operate pursuant to fixed-rate time
charters to a subsidiary of ConocoPhillips, an integrated,
international energy company. Each charter has a remaining
scheduled term of approximately 10 years, subject to
certain termination and vessel sale and purchase rights. In
addition, ConocoPhillips has the option to extend the time
charters up to an additional six years. If ConocoPhillips
declines to exercise this option, we have granted Teekay
Shipping Corporation the right to charter the vessels for up to
six years under the same pricing terms and conditions as those
in the time charters with ConocoPhillips. While the vessels are
under charter to ConocoPhillips, Teekay Shipping Corporation
will manage their operation pursuant to existing ship management
agreements.
The transaction and purchase price have been approved by the
conflicts committee of our general partners board of
directors, which committee consists of three independent
directors.
We will purchase the three Suezmax tankers with a combination of
the net proceeds from this offering and borrowings under our
existing $100 million credit facility, cash balances or
both. We will use any net proceeds from the exercise of the
over-allotment option to repay amounts borrowed under the credit
facility to purchase the vessels or for general partnership
purposes.
Following the closing of this offering, we anticipate entering
into a $137.5 million revolving credit facility secured by
the three Suezmax tankers we will acquire from Teekay Shipping
Corporation. This facility initially would be undrawn, but would
remain available to finance future projects and general
partnership purposes.
We have agreed to acquire the vessels from Teekay Shipping
Corporation for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
the long-term, fixed-rate charters fit our objective of
generating stable cash flows; |
|
|
|
the acquisition will further diversify our customer base; |
|
|
|
the acquisition is expected to increase our financial strength
and flexibility by increasing our cash flow and allowing us to
obtain other debt financing secured by the vessels, which will
be unencumbered when transferred to us; and |
|
|
|
the acquisition is expected to increase distributable cash flow
per unit. |
We estimate that the three Suezmax tankers will contribute to us
during the 12 months following this offering total EBITDA
of between $19 million and $21 million and net income
of between $10.2 million and $12.2 million. We based
both these estimates on the fixed rates in the charters, current
vessel operating costs and ship management fees associated with
these vessels and, in addition only for estimated net income, on
interest rates and the estimated net proceeds of this offering.
We may not realize this level of EBITDA or net income from the
vessels. Please read Non-GAAP Financial Measures in
Appendix B for a reconciliation of this estimated EBITDA to
the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
As a result of this acquisition, our management intends to
recommend to the board of directors of our general partner an
increase in the amount of our quarterly distribution, which
would become effective by our distribution for the quarter
ending March 31, 2006. Any such increase would be
conditioned upon, among other things, the approval of the board
of directors of our general partner and the absence of any
material adverse developments or potentially attractive
opportunities that would make such an increase inadvisable.
|
|
|
Agreement to Purchase RasGas II Interest |
We have agreed to acquire from Teekay Shipping Corporation its
70% interest in Teekay Nakilat Corporation (or Teekay
Nakilat), which owns three 151,700 cubic meter,
double-hulled LNG newbuilding carriers. We expect to take
delivery of these LNG newbuildings during the fourth quarter of
2006 and the
2
first half of 2007. Upon their deliveries, the vessels will
provide transportation services under 20-year, fixed-rate time
charters to Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II)
(or RasGas II), a joint venture between Qatar
Petroleum and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil
Corporation, established for the purpose of expanding LNG
production in Qatar. In July 2005, Qatar Gas Transport Company
Ltd. (Nakilat) exercised its option to purchase the remaining
30% of Teekay Nakilat.
The estimated purchase price for the 70% interest in Teekay
Nakilat is $92.8 million, plus the assumption of approximately
$327.7 million of long-term debt. We anticipate that Teekay
Shipping Corporation will complete U.K. lease arrangements to
finance these three vessels. We estimate that these lease
arrangements would increase our financial returns from this
project by reducing our equity contribution required for the
vessels by approximately $40 million from the current estimate
of $92.8 million, while only reducing the annual EBITDA
attributable to the project by approximately 3%. Teekay Shipping
Corporation may be unable to complete these lease arrangements.
|
|
|
Potential Additional Projects |
We have the contractual right to acquire from Teekay Shipping
Corporation its interest in LNG projects it is awarded. These
include the following projects that were awarded to Teekay
Shipping Corporation in July and August 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
Tangguh LNG Project. Teekay Shipping Corporation has been
awarded a 70% interest in two LNG carriers and related 20-year,
fixed-rate time charters to service the Tangguh LNG project in
Indonesia. The customer will be The Tangguh Production Sharing
Contractors, a consortium led by BP Berau, a subsidiary of BP
plc. Teekay Shipping Corporation has contracted to construct two
double-hulled LNG carriers of 155,000 cubic meters each at a
total delivered cost of approximately $450 million. The
charters will commence upon vessel deliveries, which are
scheduled for late 2008 and early 2009. Teekay Shipping
Corporation will have operational responsibility for the vessels
in this project. The remaining 30% interest in the project is
held by BLT LNG Tangguh Corporation, a subsidiary of
PT Berlian Laju Tanker Tbk. |
|
|
|
RasGas 3 LNG Project. Teekay Shipping Corporation
has been awarded a 40% interest in four LNG carriers and related
25-year, fixed-rate time charters (with options to extend up to
an additional 10 years) to service expansion of the LNG
project in Qatar. The customer will be Ras Laffan Liquefied
Natural Gas Co. Limited (3), a joint venture company between
Qatar Petroleum and a subsidiary of ExxonMobil Corporation.
Teekay Shipping Corporation has contracted to construct four
double-hulled LNG carriers of 217,000 cubic meters each at a
total delivered cost of approximately $1.1 billion. The
charters will commence upon vessel deliveries, which are
scheduled for the first half of 2008. The remaining 60% interest
in the project will be held by Qatar Gas Transport Company Ltd.
(Nakilat). Teekay Shipping Corporation will have operational
responsibility for the vessels in this project. Under the
charters, Qatar Gas Transport Company Ltd. (Nakilat) may assume
operational responsibility beginning 10 years following
delivery of the vessels. |
Teekay Shipping Corporation is obligated to offer us the
opportunity to pursue these projects no later than 180 days
before the scheduled delivery date of the vessels. The conflicts
committee of our general partners board of directors must
approve any decision to pursue or decline such an opportunity.
Our management may not recommend pursuing either of these
opportunities, our conflicts committee may not approve pursuing
them or we may not have the financial ability to pursue them. If
we decline an LNG project awarded to Teekay Shipping Corporation
and offered to us, Teekay Shipping Corporation may pursue the
project and we will have no further rights in the project.
3
Business Opportunities
We believe the following industry dynamics create a favorable
environment in which to expand our LNG business:
|
|
|
|
|
Strong increase in demand for LNG vessels. Natural gas
represented approximately 23% of world energy consumption in
2002 and is the fastest-growing primary energy source according
to the U.S. Department of Energy. Due to the vast distances
between many areas of natural gas production and consumption and
related impracticalities of building pipelines, seaborne
transportation of LNG provides either the only or the most
cost-effective means of transporting natural gas to many
consuming regions. To meet projected LNG shipping demand, LNG
Shipping Solutions Ltd. estimates that the world LNG carrier
fleet must expand to approximately 386 vessels by 2010 from
its current size of 187 existing vessels and 123 vessels
under order or construction as of October 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
Globalization of LNG trade routes. We believe more
opportunities to transport LNG are developing outside
traditional trade routes. We expect the Middle East and Africa
to continue to be increasingly important LNG exporting areas and
Russia, with its vast natural gas reserves, to become an LNG
exporter. We also expect Europe and North America to be among
the major LNG importers. We believe that the increase in the
number and scope of LNG trade routes will result in greater
accessibility to LNG and lead to increased LNG demand. |
|
|
|
Increasing ownership of world LNG carrier fleet by
independent owners. Until recently, major private and
state-owned energy companies owned most of the world LNG carrier
fleet. We believe that the increasing ownership of the world LNG
fleet by independent owners is attributable in part to the
desire of some major energy companies to limit their commitment
to: |
|
|
|
|
|
the marine transportation business, which is non-core to their
operations, and |
|
|
|
the cost of financing new LNG carriers in addition to the high
construction costs of LNG facilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Stringent customer standards favor high-quality
operators. Major energy companies are highly selective in
their choice of LNG transportation partners and impose
increasingly stringent pre-qualification operational and
financial standards that LNG vessel operators must meet prior to
bidding on nearly all significant LNG transportation contracts.
We believe that these rigorous and comprehensive standards will
increase our ability, relative to less qualified or experienced
operators, to compete effectively for new LNG contracts. |
Business Strategies
Our primary business objective is to increase distributable cash
flow per unit by executing the following strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Continue our practice of acquiring LNG carriers after long-term,
fixed-rate time charters have been awarded for an LNG project,
rather than ordering vessels on a speculative basis. |
|
|
|
Expand our LNG operations globally by selectively targeting
long-term, fixed-rate time charters, joint ventures and
acquisitions of vessels or other LNG shipping businesses. |
|
|
|
Leverage our own and Teekay Shipping Corporations
operational expertise to create a sustainable competitive
advantage with consistent delivery of superior customer service
by maintaining high reliability, safety, environmental and
quality standards. |
|
|
|
Manage our fleet of Suezmax tankers to provide stable cash flows
and a source of funding for expansion of our LNG operations. |
4
Competitive Strengths
We believe the following competitive strengths will enable us to
successfully execute our business strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
We have a strategic platform from which to expand our presence
in the rapidly growing LNG shipping sector. |
|
|
|
Our management and the personnel of Teekay Shipping
Corporations subsidiaries who provide services to us have
extensive experience in fleet expansion. |
|
|
|
We believe our relationship with Teekay Shipping Corporation and
its prominence and extensive customer relationships in the
shipping industry significantly enhance our growth opportunities. |
|
|
|
We supplement our operational experience through continued
access to Teekay Shipping Corporations expertise in
various functions critical to our vessel operations. |
|
|
|
We have financial flexibility to pursue acquisitions and other
expansion opportunities through additional debt borrowings and
the issuance of additional partnership units. |
Summary of Risk Factors
An investment in our common units involves risks associated with
our business, our partnership structure and the tax
characteristics of our common units. Those risks are described
under the caption Risk Factors beginning on
page 20 and include:
|
|
|
Risks Inherent in Our Business |
|
|
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to
pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our common units
following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees
and expenses. |
|
|
|
The assumptions underlying our financial estimates we include in
the Summary section of this prospectus are
inherently uncertain and are subject to significant business,
economic, financial, regulatory and competitive risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those estimated. |
|
|
|
We make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the
operating capacity of our fleet, which reduce our cash available
for distribution. In addition, each quarter our general partner
is required to deduct estimated maintenance capital expenditures
from operating surplus, which may result in less cash available
to unitholders than if actual maintenance capital expenditures
were deducted. |
|
|
|
We will be required to make substantial capital expenditures to
expand the size of our fleet. We generally will be required to
make significant installment payments for acquisitions of
newbuilding vessels prior to their delivery and generation of
revenue. Depending on whether we finance our expenditures
through cash from operations or by issuing debt or equity
securities, our ability to make cash distributions may be
diminished or our financial leverage could increase or our
unitholders could be diluted. |
|
|
|
Our substantial debt levels may limit our flexibility in
obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business
opportunities. |
|
|
|
We derive a substantial majority of our revenues from a limited
number of customers, and the loss of any customer, time charter
or vessel could result in a significant loss of revenues and
cash flow. |
|
|
|
We depend on Teekay Shipping Corporation to assist us in
operating our business, competing in our markets, and providing
interim financing for three new LNG carriers. |
|
|
|
Our growth depends on continued growth in demand for LNG and LNG
shipping. |
5
|
|
|
|
|
Growth of the LNG market may be limited by infrastructure
constraints and community and environmental group resistance to
new LNG infrastructure over concerns about the environment,
safety and terrorism. |
|
|
|
Our growth depends on our ability to expand relationships with
existing customers and obtain new customers, for which we face
substantial competition. |
|
|
|
Delays in deliveries of newbuildings could harm our operating
results and lead to the termination of related time charters. |
|
|
|
We may have more difficulty entering into long-term, fixed-rate
time charters if an active short-term or spot LNG shipping
market develops. |
|
|
|
Over time, vessel values may fluctuate substantially and, if
these values are lower at a time when we are attempting to
dispose of a vessel, we may incur a loss. |
|
|
|
We may be unable to make or realize expected benefits from
acquisitions, and implementing our growth strategy through
acquisitions may harm our business, financial condition and
operating results. |
|
|
|
Terrorist attacks, increased hostilities or war could lead to
further economic instability, increased costs and disruption of
our business. |
|
|
|
Our substantial operations outside the United States expose us
to political, governmental and economic instability, which could
harm our operations. |
|
|
|
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur
to our property or result from our operations. |
|
|
|
The marine energy transportation industry is subject to
substantial environmental and other regulations, which may
significantly limit our operations or increase our expenses. |
|
|
|
Exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations will result in
fluctuations in our cash flows and operating results. |
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
|
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates may engage in
competition with us. |
|
|
|
Our general partner and its other affiliates have conflicts of
interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may permit them to
favor their own interests to your detriment. |
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement limits our general partners
fiduciary duties to our unitholders and restricts the remedies
available to unitholders for actions taken by our general
partner. |
|
|
|
Fees and cost reimbursements, which our general partner
determines for services provided to us and certain of our
subsidiaries, are substantial and reduce our cash available for
distribution to you. |
|
|
|
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot remove our
general partner without its consent. |
|
|
|
The control of our general partner may be transferred to a third
party without unitholder consent. |
|
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$13.37 per common unit. |
|
|
|
|
We may issue additional common units without your approval,
which would dilute your ownership interests. |
|
|
|
In establishing cash reserves, our general partner may reduce
the amount of cash available for distribution to you. |
|
|
|
We have been organized as a limited partnership under the laws
of the Republic of The Marshall Islands, which does not have a
well-developed body of partnership law. |
6
|
|
|
|
|
Because we are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands,
it may be difficult to serve us with legal process or enforce
judgments against us, our directors or our management. Please
read Service of Process and Enforcement of Civil
Liabilities. |
Tax Risks
|
|
|
|
|
You may be required to pay U.S. taxes on your share of our
income even if you do not receive any cash distributions from us. |
|
|
|
Because distributions may reduce your tax basis in our common
units, you may realize greater gain on the disposition of your
units than you may otherwise expect, and you may have a tax gain
even if the price you receive is less than your original cost. |
|
|
|
The after-tax benefit of an investment in the common units may
be reduced if we are not treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
|
|
|
You may be subject to income tax in one or more
non-U.S. countries as a result of owning our common units
if, under the laws of any such country, we are considered to be
carrying on business there. Such laws may require you to file a
tax return with, and pay taxes to, those countries. Any foreign
taxes imposed on us or any of our subsidiaries will reduce our
cash available for distribution to you. |
7
Holding Company and Organizational Structures
We are a holding entity and conduct our operations and business
through subsidiaries, as is common with publicly traded limited
partnerships, to maximize operational flexibility. Teekay LNG
Operating L.L.C., a limited liability company organized in the
Marshall Islands, is our only directly owned subsidiary and
conducts all of our operations through itself and its
subsidiaries.
The following diagram depicts our organizational structure after
giving effect to this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
Public Common Units
|
|
|
31.1 |
% |
Teekay Shipping Corporations Common Units
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
Teekay Shipping Corporations Subordinated Units
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
General Partner Interest
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
These entities, which we will acquire from Teekay Shipping
Corporation upon the closing of this offering, own three Suezmax
tankers. |
8
Management of Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
Our general partner, Teekay GP L.L.C., a Marshall Islands
limited liability company, manages our operations and
activities. The executive officers and three of the seven
directors of Teekay GP L.L.C. also serve as executive officers
or directors of Teekay Shipping Corporation. For more
information about these individuals, please read
Management Directors, Executive Officers and
Key Employees.
Unlike shareholders in a publicly traded corporation, our
unitholders are not entitled to elect our general partner or its
directors.
Our general partner does not receive any management fee or other
compensation in connection with its management of our business,
but it is entitled to be reimbursed for all direct and indirect
expenses incurred on our behalf. Our general partner is also
entitled to distributions on its general partner interest and,
if specified requirements are met, on its incentive distribution
rights. Please read Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions and Management
Reimbursement of Expenses of Our General Partner.
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries have entered into,
and may enter into additional, services agreements with certain
subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation relating to the
provision to us of administrative services and to such operating
subsidiaries of strategic consulting, advisory, ship management,
technical and administrative services. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Advisory and Administrative Services Agreements.
Principal Executive Offices and Internet Address; SEC Filing
Requirements
Our principal executive offices are located at TK House, Bayside
Executive Park, West Bay Street and Blake Road, Nassau,
Commonwealth of The Bahamas, and our phone number is
(242) 502-8820. Our website is located at
http://www.teekaylng.com. We make our periodic reports and other
information filed with or furnished to the SEC available, free
of charge, through our website, as soon as reasonably
practicable after those reports and other information are
electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information
on our website or any other website is not incorporated by
reference into this prospectus and does not constitute a part of
this prospectus. Please read Where You Can Find More
Information for an explanation of our reporting
requirements as a foreign private issuer, which differ from
those applicable to public companies organized in the United
States.
Summary of Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties
Teekay GP L.L.C., our general partner, has a legal duty to
manage us in a manner beneficial to our unitholders. This legal
duty is commonly referred to as a fiduciary duty.
However, because Teekay GP L.L.C. is owned by Teekay Shipping
Corporation, the officers and directors of Teekay GP L.L.C. also
have fiduciary duties to manage the business of Teekay GP L.L.C.
in a manner beneficial to Teekay Shipping Corporation. In
addition:
|
|
|
|
|
the executive officers and three of the seven directors of
Teekay GP L.L.C. also serve as executive officers or directors
of Teekay Shipping Corporation, and another director of Teekay
GP L.L.C. is employed by an affiliate of Teekay Shipping
Corporation; |
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its other affiliates may engage
in competition with us; and |
|
|
|
we and certain of our operating subsidiaries have entered into
arrangements, and may enter into additional arrangements, with
Teekay Shipping Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries
relating to the sale of certain vessels, the purchase of
additional vessels, the provision of certain services and other
matters. |
Please read Management Directors, Executive
Officers and Key Employees and Certain Relationships
and Related Party Transactions.
9
As a result of these relationships, conflicts of interest may
arise between us and our unitholders, on the one hand, and
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its other affiliates, including
our general partner, on the other hand. For a more detailed
description of the conflicts of interest and fiduciary duties of
our general partner, please read Conflicts of Interest and
Fiduciary Duties.
In addition, our partnership agreement contains provisions that
reduce the standards to which our general partner would
otherwise be held under Marshall Islands law. For example, our
partnership agreement limits the liability and reduces the
fiduciary duties of our general partner to our unitholders. Our
partnership agreement also restricts the remedies available to
unitholders. By purchasing a common unit, you are treated as
having agreed to the modified standard of fiduciary duties and
to certain actions that may be taken by our general partner, all
as set forth in the partnership agreement. Please read
Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties for a
description of the fiduciary duties that would otherwise be
imposed on our general partner under Marshall Islands law, the
material modifications of those duties contained in our
partnership agreement and certain legal rights and remedies
available to our unitholders under Marshall Islands law.
For a description of our other relationships with our
affiliates, please read Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions.
10
The Offering
|
|
|
Common units offered to the public |
|
4,000,000 common units. |
|
|
|
4,600,000 common units if the underwriters exercise their
over-allotment option in full. |
|
Units outstanding after this offering |
|
19,638,072 common units and 14,734,572 subordinated units,
representing 56.0% and 42.0% limited partner interests in us,
respectively, assuming no exercise of the over-allotment option. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to apply the net proceeds of this offering, along with
borrowings on our credit facility, cash balances or both,
towards the purchase price for the three Suezmax tankers and
related long-term, fixed-rate time charters we will acquire from
Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of this offering. |
|
|
|
The net proceeds from any exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option will be used to repay borrowings under our
credit facility or for general partnership purposes. |
|
Cash distributions |
|
We make minimum quarterly distributions of $0.4125 per
common unit to the extent we have sufficient cash from
operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment of
fees and expenses, including payments to our general partner. In
general, we pay any cash distributions we make each quarter in
the following manner: |
|
|
|
first, 98% to the holders of common units and 2% to
our general partner, until each common unit has received a
minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125 plus any arrearages
from prior quarters; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the holders of subordinated units and
2% to our general partner, until each subordinated unit has
received a minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125; and |
|
|
|
third, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
our general partner, until each unit has received an aggregate
distribution of $0.4625. |
|
|
|
If cash distributions exceed $0.4625 per unit in a quarter,
our general partner will receive increasing percentages, up to
50%, of the cash we distribute in excess of that amount. We
refer to these distributions as incentive
distributions. |
|
|
|
We must distribute all of our cash on hand at the end of each
quarter, less reserves established by our general partner to
provide for the proper conduct of our business, to comply with
any applicable debt instruments or to provide funds for future
distributions. We refer to this cash as available
cash, and we define its meaning in our partnership
agreement and in the glossary of terms attached as
Appendix A. The amount of available cash may be greater
than or less than the aggregate |
11
|
|
|
|
|
amount of the minimum quarterly distribution to be distributed
on all units. |
|
Subordinated units |
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation owns all of our subordinated units.
The principal difference between our common units and
subordinated units is that in any quarter during the
subordination period the subordinated units are entitled to
receive the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125 only after
the common units have received the minimum quarterly
distribution and arrearages in the payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution from prior quarters. Subordinated units
do not accrue arrearages. The subordination period will end once
we meet the financial tests in the partnership agreement, but it
generally cannot end before March 31, 2010. These financial
tests require us to have earned and paid the minimum quarterly
distribution on all of our outstanding units for three
consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods. |
|
|
|
When the subordination period ends, all remaining subordinated
units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis, and
the common units will no longer be entitled to arrearages. |
|
Early conversion of subordinated units |
|
If we meet the financial tests in the partnership agreement for
any three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
ending on or after March 31, 2008, 25% of the subordinated
units will convert into common units. If we meet these tests for
any three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
ending on or after March 31, 2009, an additional 25% of the
subordinated units will convert into common units. The early
conversion of the second 25% of the subordinated units may not
occur until at least one year after the early conversion of the
first 25% of subordinated units. |
|
Issuance of additional units |
|
We can issue an unlimited number of units without the consent of
our unitholders. |
|
Limited voting rights |
|
Our general partner manages and operates us. Unlike the holders
of common stock in a corporation, you will have only limited
voting rights on matters affecting our business. You will have
no right to elect our general partner or the directors of our
general partner on an annual or other continuing basis. Our
general partner may not be removed except by a vote of the
holders of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding units, including any units owned by our
general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single
class. As a result, you initially may be unable to remove our
general partner without its consent because Teekay Shipping
Corporation and its affiliates will own sufficient units upon
completion of this offering to be able to prevent the general
partners removal. Please read The Partnership
Agreement Voting Rights. |
|
Limited call right |
|
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the outstanding common units, our general partner |
12
|
|
|
|
|
has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase all, but not
less than all, of the remaining common units at a price not less
than the then-current market price of the common units. Our
general partner is not obligated to obtain a fairness opinion
regarding the value of the common units to be repurchased by it
upon the exercise of this limited call right. |
|
|
Estimated ratio of taxable income to distributions |
|
We estimate that if you hold the common units you purchase in
this offering through December 31, 2008, you will be
allocated, on a cumulative basis, an amount of U.S. federal
taxable income for that period that will be 20% or less of the
cash distributed to you with respect to that period. For
example, if you receive an annual distribution of $1.65 per
unit, we estimate that your allocable U.S. federal taxable
income per year will be no more than $0.33 per unit. For a
discussion of the basis for this estimate and of factors that
may affect our ability to achieve this estimate, please read
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Consequences of Unit
Ownership Ratio of Taxable Income to
Distributions. |
|
|
Material U.S. federal income tax consequences |
|
For a discussion of other material federal income tax
consequences that may be relevant to prospective unitholders who
are individual citizens or residents of the United States,
please read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences. |
|
Material non-U.S. tax consequences |
|
For a discussion of material non-U.S. tax consequences that
may be relevant to prospective unitholders, please read
Business Taxation of the Partnership and
Non-United States Tax Consequences. |
|
New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
TGP |
13
Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating
Data
The following tables present, in each case for the periods and
as of the dates indicated, summary:
|
|
|
|
|
historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain, which
was named Naviera F. Tapias S.A. prior to its acquisition by
Teekay Shipping Corporation through its subsidiary, Teekay
Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (or Luxco), on April 30, 2004; |
|
|
|
historical financial and operating data of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. since its initial public offering on May 10, 2005, in
connection with which it acquired Luxco from Teekay Shipping
Corporation; and |
|
|
|
pro forma financial and operating data of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. |
The summary historical financial and operating data has been
prepared on the following basis:
|
|
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain
excludes financial information related to three businesses
previously held in separate subsidiaries and unrelated to the
marine transportation of LNG and crude oil, which were disposed
of prior to Teekay Shipping Corporations acquisition of
Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 and
the four months ended April 30, 2004 are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of Teekay Spain
included elsewhere in this prospectus; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at and for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 are
derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of
Teekay Spain, which are not included in this prospectus; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at December 31, 2004 and for the eight months ended
December 31, 2004 reflect the acquisition of Teekay Spain
by Teekay Shipping Corporation and are derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements of Teekay Spain included
elsewhere in this prospectus; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain, for
the four months ended April 30, 2004, the two months ended
June 30, 2004 and the period from January 1, 2005 to
May 9, 2005 reflect the acquisition of Teekay Spain by
Teekay Shipping Corporation and are derived from the unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. included elsewhere in this prospectus; and |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay LNG
Partners L.P. as at June 30, 2005 and for the period from
May 10, 2005 to June 30, 2005 reflect its initial
public offering and related acquisition of Luxco and are derived
from the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
The unaudited pro forma financial and operating data of Teekay
LNG Partners L.P. give pro forma effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
the contribution by Teekay Shipping Corporation to us of the
capital stock and certain notes receivable of Luxco in
connection with our initial public offering; |
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporations loans and contributions to us
prior to our initial public offering, which we used, together
with existing cash, to repay indebtedness and settle interest
rate swaps; and |
|
|
|
the completion of our initial public offering and use of the net
proceeds of that offering. |
The pro forma financial data presented for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the six months ended June 30,
2005 are derived from our unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements. The pro forma income statement data for
the year ended December 31, 2004 and the six months ended
June 30,
14
2005 assumes our initial public offering and related
transactions occurred on January 1, 2004. A more complete
explanation of the pro forma data can be found in our unaudited
pro forma consolidated financial statements included with this
prospectus.
The following table presents two financial measures, net voyage
revenues and EBITDA, which we use in our business. These
financial measures are not calculated or presented in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (or
GAAP). We explain these measures below and reconcile them
to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated
and presented in accordance with GAAP in Appendix B to this
prospectus.
Because drydocking expenditures are more extensive in nature
than normal routine maintenance, we capitalize and amortize them
for a given vessel from the completion of a drydocking to the
estimated completion of the next drydocking. For more
information about our accounting treatment of drydocking
expenditures, please read Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Overview Important Financial
and Operational Terms and Concepts Drydocking
and Depreciation and Amortization.
To make the summary historical financial and operating data more
comparable, our historical operating results do not include the
historical results of Luxco for the two months ended
June 30, 2004, the nine months ended December 31, 2004
or the period from January 1, 2005 to May 9, 2005 (or
the 2005 Pre-IPO Period). During these periods, Luxco had
no revenues, expenses or income, or assets or liabilities, other
than:
|
|
|
|
|
advances (including accrued interest) of $465.7 million and
$312.3 million as of December 31, 2004 and
June 30, 2004, respectively, from Teekay Shipping
Corporation that Luxco used to purchase Teekay Spain and to
prepay certain debt of Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
net interest expense related to the advances of
$9.8 million, $2.4 million and $7.3 million for
the nine months ended December 31, 2004, the two months
ended June 30, 2004 and for the 2005 Pre-IPO Period,
respectively; |
|
|
|
unrealized foreign exchange losses of $44.7 million and
$3.8 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2004 and the two months ended June 30, 2004, respectively,
related to the advances, which are Euro-denominated, and a
$23.8 million unrealized foreign exchange gain related to
the advances for the 2005 Pre-IPO Period; |
|
|
|
other expenses of $1.1 million, $0.1 million and
$0.1 million for those respective periods; |
|
|
|
cash and cash equivalents of $2.2 million and
$10.0 million as of December 31, 2004 and
June 30, 2004, respectively; and |
|
|
|
its ownership interest in Teekay Spain and certain purchase
rights and obligations for Suezmax tankers operated by Teekay
Spain under capital lease arrangements, which it acquired from
Teekay Spain on December 30, 2004. |
We believe the exclusion of the Luxco results makes our results
more comparable because Luxcos results and financial
position relate solely to the financing of the acquisition of
Teekay Spain and repayment of Teekay Spain debt by Teekay
Shipping Corporation and do not relate to the historical results
of Teekay Spain. In addition, because the capital stock of Luxco
and the advances from Teekay Shipping Corporation were
contributed to us in connection with our initial public
offering, these advances and their related effects were
eliminated on consolidation, as reflected in our summary pro
forma financial data. For more information on Luxco, please read
the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Luxco
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
15
The following tables should be read together with, and are
qualified in their entirety by reference to, the historical and
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
tables also should be read together with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. Footnotes for both of these tables follow the
second table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except per unit and fleet data) | |
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
52,217 |
|
|
$ |
60,326 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses(1)
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
Vessel operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
10,883 |
|
|
|
12,403 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,803 |
|
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,967 |
|
|
|
5,061 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
33,957 |
|
|
|
38,650 |
|
|
|
45,628 |
|
|
|
63,540 |
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
53,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
14,238 |
|
|
|
23,169 |
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
29,135 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(15,625 |
) |
|
|
(20,104 |
) |
|
|
(18,109 |
) |
|
|
(34,862 |
) |
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
(40,560 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
8,431 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
13,426 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)(3)
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
3,462 |
|
|
|
(44,310 |
) |
|
|
(71,502 |
) |
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
(34,149 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,618 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss)(5)
|
|
|
3,615 |
|
|
|
5,327 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before change in accounting principle
|
|
|
7,349 |
|
|
|
6,495 |
|
|
|
(113,770 |
) |
|
|
(59,432 |
) |
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
(28,787 |
) |
Change in accounting principle(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
7,349 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per unit (basic and diluted)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities
|
|
$ |
24,185 |
|
|
$ |
24,625 |
|
|
$ |
20,141 |
|
|
$ |
22,533 |
|
|
$ |
11,289 |
|
|
$ |
154,203 |
|
Restricted cash deposits(8)
|
|
|
29,243 |
|
|
|
70,051 |
|
|
|
106,399 |
|
|
|
398,038 |
|
|
|
385,564 |
|
|
|
435,112 |
|
Vessels and equipment(9)
|
|
|
277,076 |
|
|
|
368,951 |
|
|
|
705,010 |
|
|
|
602,550 |
|
|
|
602,055 |
|
|
|
813,431 |
|
Total assets(8)
|
|
|
357,247 |
|
|
|
491,058 |
|
|
|
882,604 |
|
|
|
1,069,081 |
|
|
|
1,021,695 |
|
|
|
1,651,522 |
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations(8)(10)
|
|
|
317,710 |
|
|
|
444,865 |
|
|
|
882,027 |
|
|
|
1,129,426 |
|
|
|
1,072,379 |
|
|
|
1,200,499 |
|
Total stockholders/partners equity (deficit)
|
|
|
34,673 |
|
|
|
29,849 |
|
|
|
(106,105 |
) |
|
|
(164,809 |
) |
|
|
(144,186 |
) |
|
|
184,650 |
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
19,695 |
|
|
$ |
24,770 |
|
|
$ |
20,418 |
|
|
$ |
18,318 |
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
7,381 |
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
31,852 |
|
|
|
176,316 |
|
|
|
(277,616 |
) |
|
|
(25,846 |
) |
|
|
95,645 |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(23,304 |
) |
|
|
(55,695 |
) |
|
|
(199,218 |
) |
|
|
262,766 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
39,986 |
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
47,913 |
|
|
$ |
55,234 |
|
|
$ |
54,532 |
|
|
$ |
81,798 |
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
|
$ |
80,025 |
|
EBITDA(11)
|
|
|
36,556 |
|
|
|
33,912 |
|
|
|
(81,056 |
) |
|
|
(6,578 |
) |
|
|
36,887 |
|
|
|
24,571 |
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
173,186 |
|
|
|
110,097 |
|
|
|
186,755 |
|
|
|
133,628 |
|
|
|
5,522 |
|
|
|
83,703 |
|
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
4,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
LNG Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Suezmax Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Six | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
May 1, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
May 10, | |
|
Year | |
|
Months | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except per unit and fleet data) | |
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
17,453 |
|
|
$ |
50,129 |
|
|
$ |
20,364 |
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
|
$ |
70,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses(1)
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
Vessel operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
10,771 |
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
30,617 |
|
|
|
14,703 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
6,426 |
|
|
|
14,751 |
|
|
|
5,852 |
|
|
|
37,808 |
|
|
|
20,603 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
8,813 |
|
|
|
5,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
13,280 |
|
|
|
28,689 |
|
|
|
11,131 |
|
|
|
82,170 |
|
|
|
40,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
4,173 |
|
|
|
21,440 |
|
|
|
9,233 |
|
|
|
41,663 |
|
|
|
29,836 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
(8,632 |
) |
|
|
(28,356 |
) |
|
|
(8,196 |
) |
|
|
(31,060 |
) |
|
|
(26,778 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
3,473 |
|
|
|
9,098 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
22,211 |
|
|
|
12,101 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)(3)
|
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
(6,189 |
) |
|
|
23,835 |
|
|
|
22,993 |
|
|
|
(16,139 |
) |
|
|
46,828 |
|
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)(4)
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss)(5)
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
(17,927 |
) |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
(17,269 |
) |
|
|
(1,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before change in accounting principle
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
(6,571 |
) |
|
|
8,090 |
|
|
|
28,703 |
|
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
|
|
60,123 |
|
Change in accounting principle(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(6,571 |
) |
|
$ |
8,090 |
|
|
$ |
28,703 |
|
|
$ |
(1,499 |
) |
|
$ |
60,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) per unit (basic and diluted)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities
|
|
$ |
11,289 |
|
|
$ |
15,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash deposits(8)
|
|
|
385,564 |
|
|
|
393,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment(9)
|
|
|
602,055 |
|
|
|
823,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,152,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets(8)
|
|
|
1,021,695 |
|
|
|
1,476,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,826,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations(8)(10)
|
|
|
1,072,379 |
|
|
|
1,089,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
965,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders/partners equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(144,186 |
) |
|
|
284,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
682,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
3,596 |
|
|
$ |
11,867 |
|
|
$ |
13,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(25,846 |
) |
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
(159,845 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
(4,965 |
) |
|
|
19,066 |
|
|
|
15,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
|
$ |
15,991 |
|
|
$ |
49,879 |
|
|
$ |
20,291 |
|
|
$ |
118,901 |
|
|
$ |
70,169 |
|
EBITDA(11)
|
|
|
36,887 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
|
44,747 |
|
|
|
38,076 |
|
|
|
46,141 |
|
|
|
97,268 |
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
5,522 |
|
|
|
4,965 |
|
|
|
43,962 |
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
|
|
89,225 |
|
|
|
48,921 |
|
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
LNG Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Suezmax Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
(footnotes on following page)
17
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage,
including any bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and
unloading expenses, canal tolls, agency fees and commissions. |
|
|
(2) |
Vessel operating expenses include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. |
|
|
(3) |
Substantially all of these foreign currency exchange gains and
losses were unrealized and not settled in cash. Under
U.S. accounting guidelines, all foreign
currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities, such as
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, restricted cash,
accounts payable, long-term debt and capital lease obligations,
are revalued and reported based on the prevailing exchange rate
at the end of the period. Our primary source for the foreign
currency gains and losses is our Euro-denominated term loans,
which totaled 294.8 million Euros ($372.4 million) at
December 31, 2003, 325.8 million Euros
($443.7 million) at December 31, 2004 and
321.7 million Euros ($389.2 million) at June 30,
2005. |
|
|
(4) |
We have entered into interest rate swaps to hedge our interest
rate risk from our floating-rate debt used to purchase our LNG
carriers. These interest rate swaps were not designated as
hedges under U.S. accounting guidelines until
April 30, 2004. Consequently, the changes in the fair
values of these swaps that occurred during periods prior to
April 30, 2004 have been recorded in earnings as
interest rate swaps gain (loss) for those periods.
Had these interest rate swaps been designated as hedges prior to
2003, any subsequent changes in fair value would have been
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) to the extent the hedge was effective and until the
hedged item was recognized as income. |
|
|
(5) |
The $10.9 million other loss in the four months ended
April 30, 2004 primarily resulted from a $11.9 million
loss on the sale of non-shipping assets by Teekay Spain prior to
its April 30, 2004 acquisition by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. The $17.9 million other loss in the period
from January 1, 2005 to May 9, 2005 primarily resulted
from a write-off of capitalized loan costs and a loss on
cancellation of interest rate swaps. The $17.3 million
other loss in the pro forma year ended December 31, 2004
primarily resulted from the $11.9 million loss on the sale
of non-shipping assets and from a write-down of capitalized loan
costs on a pro forma basis. |
|
|
(6) |
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (or
SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, which establishes new
standards for recording derivatives in interim and annual
financial statements. We adopted SFAS 133 on
January 1, 2001. We recognized the fair value of our
derivatives as liabilities of $4.4 million on our
consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2001. This
amount was recorded as a change in accounting principle in our
consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2001. |
|
|
(7) |
Please read Note 5 of our unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus for a
calculation of our pro forma net income (loss) per unit. |
|
|
(8) |
We operate two of our LNG carriers under Spanish tax
lease arrangements. Under these arrangements, we borrow
under term loans and deposit the proceeds into restricted cash
accounts. Concurrently, we enter into capital leases for the
vessels, which are recorded as assets on our balance sheet. The
restricted cash deposits, plus the interest earned on the
deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the
capital lease arrangements, including our obligations to
purchase the vessels at the end of the lease term. Therefore,
the payments under our capital leases are fully funded through
our restricted cash deposits, and our continuing obligation is
the repayment of the term loans. However, under GAAP we record
both the obligations under the capital leases and the term loans
as liabilities, and both the restricted cash deposits and our
vessels under capital leases as assets. This accounting
treatment has the effect of overstating our assets and
liabilities by the amount of restricted cash deposits relating
to the corresponding capital lease obligations. As at
December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2005, our total assets
and total debt each included $413.3 million and
$377.6 million, respectively, of such amounts. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Ship Financing Arrangements. |
18
|
|
|
|
(9) |
Vessels and equipment consist of (a) our vessels, at cost
less accumulated depreciation, (b) vessels under capital
leases, at cost less accumulated depreciation, and
(c) advances on our newbuildings. |
|
|
(10) |
Total debt for Teekay Spain as at December 31, 2004
excludes a loan made to it in December 2004 of 82.1 million
Euros ($111.8 million) by Teekay Spains direct parent
company, Teekay Spain, S.L., a subsidiary of Luxco. In April
2005, Teekay Spain used these funds to repay debt associated
with two of its LNG carriers. |
|
(11) |
EBITDA is calculated as net income(loss) before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as set forth in Appendix B
to this prospectus, which also includes reconciliations of
EBITDA to our most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
EBITDA includes our foreign currency exchange and interest rate
swap gains and losses, substantially all of which were
unrealized, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
3,462 |
|
|
$ |
(44,310 |
) |
|
$ |
(71,502 |
) |
|
$ |
18,010 |
|
|
$ |
(34,149 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,618 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,156 |
) |
|
$ |
(115,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,787 |
) |
|
$ |
21,995 |
|
|
$ |
(34,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Six | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
May 1, | |
|
|
|
May 10, | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
January 1, | |
|
to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
to May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
|
|
$ |
18,010 |
|
|
$ |
(6,189 |
) |
|
$ |
23,835 |
|
|
$ |
22,993 |
|
|
$ |
(16,139 |
) |
|
$ |
46,828 |
|
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,995 |
|
|
$ |
(6,189 |
) |
|
$ |
23,835 |
|
|
$ |
22,993 |
|
|
$ |
(16,139 |
) |
|
$ |
46,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12) |
Calendar-ship-days are equal to the aggregate number of calendar
days in a period that our vessels were in our possession during
that period. |
19
RISK FACTORS
Although many of our business risks are comparable to those a
corporation engaged in a similar business would face, limited
partner interests are inherently different from the capital
stock of a corporation. You should carefully consider the
following risk factors together with all of the other
information included in this prospectus when evaluating an
investment in our common units.
If any of the following risks actually occur, our business,
financial condition or operating results could be materially
adversely affected. In that case, we might not be able to pay
distributions on our common units, the trading price of our
common units could decline, and you could lose all or part of
your investment.
Risks Inherent in Our Business
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable
us to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our common units
following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees
and expenses. |
We may not have sufficient cash available each quarter to pay
the minimum quarterly distribution. The amount of cash we can
distribute on our common units principally depends upon the
amount of cash we generate from our operations, which may
fluctuate based on, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the rates we obtain from our charters; |
|
|
|
the level of our operating costs, such as the cost of crews and
insurance; |
|
|
|
the continued availability of LNG production, liquefaction and
regasification facilities; |
|
|
|
the number of unscheduled off-hire days for our fleet and the
timing of, and number of days required for, scheduled drydocking
of our vessels; |
|
|
|
delays in the delivery of newbuildings and the beginning of
payments under charters relating to those vessels; |
|
|
|
prevailing global and regional economic and political conditions; |
|
|
|
currency exchange rate fluctuations; and |
|
|
|
the effect of governmental regulations and maritime
self-regulatory organization standards on the conduct of our
business. |
The actual amount of cash we will have available for
distribution also will depend on factors such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures we make, including for
maintaining vessels, building new vessels, acquiring existing
vessels and complying with regulations; |
|
|
|
our debt service requirements and restrictions on distributions
contained in our debt instruments; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in our working capital needs; |
|
|
|
our ability to make working capital borrowings, including to pay
distributions to unitholders; and |
|
|
|
the amount of any cash reserves, including reserves for future
capital expenditures and other matters, established by our
general partner in its discretion. |
The amount of cash we generate from our operations may differ
materially from our profit or loss for the period, which will be
affected by non-cash items. As a result of this and the other
factors mentioned above, we may make cash distributions during
periods when we record losses and may not make cash
distributions during periods when we record net income.
20
|
|
|
The assumptions underlying our financial estimates
relating to the operation of the three Suezmax tankers we will
acquire from Teekay Shipping Corporation that we include in the
Summary section of this prospectus are inherently
uncertain and are subject to significant business, economic,
financial, regulatory and competitive risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
estimated. |
We include in the Summary section of this prospectus
estimated net income and EBITDA, for the 12 months
following their acquisition, for the three Suezmax tankers we
will acquire from Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing
of this offering. These financial estimates have been prepared
by management and we have not received an opinion or report on
these estimates from our or any other independent auditor or
other third party. The assumptions underlying the estimates are
inherently uncertain and are subject to significant business,
economic, regulatory and competitive risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
estimated. If we do not achieve the estimated results, we may
not be able to increase distributable cash flow per unit,
increase our quarterly distribution or pay the full minimum
quarterly distribution or any amount on the common units or
subordinated units, in which event the market price of the
common units may decline materially.
|
|
|
We make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the
operating capacity of our fleet, which reduce our cash available
for distribution. In addition, each quarter our general partner
is required to deduct estimated maintenance capital expenditures
from operating surplus, which may result in less cash available
to unitholders than if actual maintenance capital expenditures
were deducted. |
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain, over
the long term, the operating capacity of our fleet, which we
estimate will average approximately $21.2 million per year
for the useful lives of our existing vessels, including the
three Suezmax tankers we will acquire from Teekay Shipping
Corporation upon the closing of this offering. These maintenance
capital expenditures include capital expenditures associated
with drydocking a vessel, modifying an existing vessel or
acquiring a new vessel to the extent these expenditures are
incurred to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet. These
expenditures could increase as a result of changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
the cost of labor and materials; |
|
|
|
customer requirements; |
|
|
|
increases in the size of our fleet; |
|
|
|
governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory
organization standards relating to safety, security or the
environment; and |
|
|
|
competitive standards. |
Our significant maintenance capital expenditures reduce the
amount of cash we have available for distribution to our
unitholders.
In addition, our actual maintenance capital expenditures vary
significantly from quarter to quarter based on, among other
things, the number of vessels drydocked during that quarter. Our
partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct
estimated, rather than actual, maintenance capital expenditures
from operating surplus each quarter in an effort to reduce
fluctuations in operating surplus. The amount of estimated
maintenance capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus
is subject to review and change by the conflicts committee at
least once a year. In years when estimated maintenance capital
expenditures are higher than actual maintenance capital
expenditures as we expect will be the case in the
years we are not required to make expenditures for mandatory
drydockings the amount of cash available for
distribution to unitholders will be lower than if actual
maintenance capital expenditures were deducted from operating
surplus. If our general partner underestimates the appropriate
level of estimated maintenance capital expenditures, we may have
less cash available for distribution in future periods when
actual capital expenditures begin to exceed our previous
estimates.
21
|
|
|
We will be required to make substantial capital
expenditures to expand the size of our fleet. We generally will
be required to make significant installment payments for
acquisitions of newbuilding vessels prior to their delivery and
generation of revenue. Depending on whether we finance our
expenditures through cash from operations or by issuing debt or
equity securities, our ability to make cash distributions may be
diminished or our financial leverage could increase or our
unitholders could be diluted. |
We intend to make substantial capital expenditures to increase
the size of our fleet, particularly the number of LNG carriers
we own. The contract price of a new LNG carrier is currently
approximately $200 million, although the actual cost will
vary significantly depending on the market price charged by
shipyards, the size of the vessel, governmental regulations and
maritime self-regulatory organization standards. The total
delivered cost of a vessel will be higher and include financing,
construction supervision, vessel start-up and other costs.
We generally will be required to make installment payments on
newbuildings prior to their delivery. We typically must pay 20%
of the purchase price of an LNG carrier upon signing the
purchase contract, even though delivery of the completed vessel
will not occur until much later (approximately three years later
for current orders). If we finance these acquisition costs by
issuing debt or equity securities, we will increase the
aggregate amount of interest or minimum quarterly distributions
we must make prior to generating cash from the operation of the
newbuilding.
The purchase price for the three Suezmax tankers, related time
charters and other assets we will acquire from Teekay Shipping
Corporation upon the closing of this offering is
$180 million. We will finance this purchase with the net
proceeds of this offering and borrowings under our credit
facility, cash balances or both.
We also have agreed to purchase from Teekay Shipping Corporation
its 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat Corporation (or Teekay
Nakilat), which owns three LNG newbuildings and related
long-term, fixed-rate time charters, for an estimated purchase
price of $92.8 million, plus the assumption of
approximately $327.7 million of long-term debt. This
purchase will take place in connection with the delivery of the
first newbuilding scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2006. We
anticipate that Teekay Shipping Corporation will complete
U.K. lease arrangements to finance the equity portion of
the purchase price for these vessels; these lease arrangements
are described in more detail in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Ship Financing Arrangements. If
Teekay Shipping Corporation is unable to complete the
U.K. lease arrangements, we intend to fund the equity
portion of the purchase price through internally generated
funds, debt or equity financings. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Agreement to Purchase RasGas II Interest.
In addition, we are obligated to purchase five of our existing
Suezmax tankers upon the termination of the related capital
leases, which will occur at various times from 2007 to 2011,
seven years from the respective commencement dates of the
capital leases. The purchase price will be based on the
unamortized portion of the vessel construction financing costs
for the vessels, which we expect to range from
$39.4 million to $43.5 million per vessel.
We and Teekay Shipping Corporation regularly evaluate and pursue
opportunities to provide the marine transportation requirements
for new or expanding LNG projects. Teekay Shipping Corporation
currently has submitted bids to provide transportation
requirements for LNG projects and we and Teekay Shipping
Corporation may submit additional bids from time to time. The
award process relating to LNG transportation opportunities
typically involves various stages and takes several months to
complete. The award process for some of the projects upon which
Teekay Shipping Corporation has bid are in advanced stages.
Neither we nor Teekay Shipping Corporation may be awarded
charters relating to any of the projects we or it pursues. If
any LNG project charters are awarded to Teekay Shipping
Corporation, it must offer them to us pursuant to the terms of
the omnibus agreement. Please read Certain Relationships
and Related Party Transactions Omnibus
Agreement. In July and August 2005, Teekay Shipping
Corporation announced the awards to it of a 70% interest in two
LNG carriers and related long-term,
22
fixed-rate time charters to service the Tangguh LNG project in
Indonesia and a 40% interest in four LNG carriers and related
long-term, fixed-rate time charters to service an LNG project in
Qatar. In connection with these awards, Teekay Shipping
Corporation has (a) exercised shipbuilding options to
construct two 155,000 cubic meter LNG carriers at a total cost
of approximately $450 million, which vessels are scheduled
to deliver in late 2008 and early 2009, respectively, and
(b) entered into agreements to construct four 217,000 cubic
meter LNG carriers at a total cost of approximately
$1.1 billion, which vessels are scheduled to deliver in the
first half of 2008. The total delivered cost of these vessels
will exceed the construction costs above.
If we elect pursuant to the omnibus agreement to obtain Teekay
Shipping Corporations interests in either or both of these
LNG projects or any other projects Teekay Shipping Corporation
may be awarded, or if we bid on and are awarded contracts
relating to any LNG project, we will need to incur significant
capital expenditures to build the LNG carriers needed to fulfill
the transportation requirements.
To fund the remaining portion of these and other capital
expenditures, we will be required to use cash from operations or
incur borrowings or raise capital through the sale of debt or
additional equity securities. Use of cash from operations will
reduce cash available for distributions to unitholders. Our
ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital
markets for future offerings may be limited by our financial
condition at the time of any such financing or offering as well
as by adverse market conditions resulting from, among other
things, general economic conditions and contingencies and
uncertainties that are beyond our control. Our failure to obtain
the funds for necessary future capital expenditures could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition and on our ability to make cash
distributions. Even if we are successful in obtaining necessary
funds, the terms of such financings could limit our ability to
pay cash distributions to unitholders. In addition, incurring
additional debt may significantly increase our interest expense
and financial leverage, and issuing additional equity securities
may result in significant unitholder dilution and would increase
the aggregate amount of cash required to meet our minimum
quarterly distribution to unitholders, which could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to make cash
distributions.
|
|
|
Our substantial debt levels may limit our flexibility in
obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business
opportunities. |
As of June 30, 2005, our consolidated debt and capital
lease obligations were $1.0 billion. In addition, we will
have the capacity to borrow $100 million under our existing
revolving credit facility, which we intend to draw on to finance
part of the purchase price for the three Suezmax tankers we will
acquire from Teekay Shipping Corporation. We also anticipate
entering into a $137.5 million credit facility secured by
these Suezmax tankers following the closing of this offering. If
we are awarded contracts for new LNG projects, our consolidated
debt and capital lease obligations will increase, perhaps
significantly. Following this offering, we will continue to have
the ability to incur additional debt, subject to limitations in
our credit facilities. Our level of debt could have important
consequences to us, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other
purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available
on favorable terms; |
|
|
|
we will need a substantial portion of our cash flow to make
principal and interest payments on our debt, reducing the funds
that would otherwise be available for operations, future
business opportunities and distributions to unitholders; |
|
|
|
our debt level will make us more vulnerable than our competitors
with less debt to competitive pressures or a downturn in our
business or the economy generally; and |
|
|
|
our debt level may limit our flexibility in responding to
changing business and economic conditions. |
Our ability to service our debt will depend upon, among other
things, our future financial and operating performance, which
will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and
financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which
are beyond our control. If our operating results are not
23
sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we
will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions,
reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions,
investments or capital expenditures, selling assets,
restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional
equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to
effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all.
|
|
|
We derive a substantial majority of our revenues from a
limited number of customers, and the loss of any customer, time
charter or vessel could result in a significant loss of revenues
and cash flow. |
We have derived, and believe that we will continue to derive, a
significant portion of our revenues and cash flow from a limited
number of customers. Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. (or
CEPSA), an international oil company, accounted for
approximately 47%, 36% and 30% of our revenues during 2003 and
2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively.
In addition, two other customers, Spanish energy companies
Repsol YPF, S.A. and Gas Natural SDG, S.A., accounted for 26%
and 11% of our revenues in 2003, 18% and 21% of our revenues in
2004 and 34% and 19% of our revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2005, respectively. In addition, Unión Fenosa
Gas, S.A. accounted for 17% of our revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2005. Collectively, CEPSA, Repsol YPF, S.A.
and Gas Natural SDG, S.A. accounted for approximately 84% and
75% of our revenues during 2003 and 2004, respectively, and,
together with Unión Fenosa Gas, S.A., 100% of our revenues
during the six months ended June 30, 2005. No other
customer accounted for 10% or more of our revenues during any of
these periods. After our acquisition of the three Suezmax
tankers from Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of
this offering, we will derive a significant portion of our
revenues from a ConocoPhillips subsidiary, the customer under
the related time charter contracts. Likewise, RasGas II
will be a significant customer following the delivery in 2006
and 2007 of the three LNG newbuildings we have agreed to
purchase from Teekay Shipping Corporation and commencement of
payments by RasGas II under the related time charters.
We could lose a customer or the benefits of a time charter if:
|
|
|
|
|
the customer fails to make charter payments because of its
financial inability, disagreements with us or otherwise; |
|
|
|
the customer exercises certain rights to terminate the charter,
purchase or cause the sale of the vessel or, under some of our
charters, convert the time charter to a bareboat charter (some
of which rights are exercisable at any time); |
|
|
|
the customer terminates the charter because we fail to deliver
the vessel within a fixed period of time, the vessel is lost or
damaged beyond repair, there are serious deficiencies in the
vessel or prolonged periods of off-hire, or we default under the
charter; or |
|
|
|
under some of our time charters, the customer terminates the
charter because of the termination of the charterers LNG
sales agreement supplying the LNG designated for our services,
or a prolonged force majeure event affecting the customer,
including damage to or destruction of relevant LNG production or
regasification facilities, war or political unrest preventing us
from performing services for that customer. |
Please read Business LNG Time
Charters Purchase Options, Termination Rights and
Bareboat Conversion Options and Business
Crude Oil Time Charters Rights to Terminate Charter
or Cause Sale of Vessel.
If we lose a key LNG time charter, we may be unable to re-deploy
the related vessel on terms as favorable to us due to the
long-term nature of most LNG time charters and the lack of an
established LNG spot market. If we are unable to re-deploy an
LNG carrier, we will not receive any revenues from that vessel,
but we may be required to pay expenses necessary to maintain the
vessel in proper operating condition. In addition, if a customer
exercises its right to purchase a vessel, we would not receive
any further revenue from the vessel and may be unable to obtain
a substitute vessel and charter. This may cause us to receive
decreased revenue and cash flows from having fewer vessels
operating in our fleet. Any
24
compensation under our charters for a purchase of the vessels
may not adequately compensate us for the loss of the vessel and
related time charter.
If we lose a key Suezmax tanker customer, we may be unable to
obtain other long-term Suezmax charters and may become subject
to the volatile spot market, which is highly competitive and
subject to significant price fluctuations. If a customer
exercises its right under some charters to purchase or force a
sale of the vessel, we may be unable to acquire an adequate
replacement vessel or may be forced to construct a new vessel.
Any replacement newbuilding would not generate revenues during
its construction and we may be unable to charter any replacement
vessel on terms as favorable to us as those of the terminated
charter.
The loss of any of our customers, time charters or vessels, or a
decline in payments under our charters, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
|
|
|
We depend on Teekay Shipping Corporation to assist us in
operating our business, competing in our markets, and providing
interim financing for certain vessel acquisitions. |
Pursuant to certain services agreements between us and certain
of our operating subsidiaries, on the one hand, and certain
subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation, on the other hand,
the Teekay Shipping Corporation subsidiaries provide to us
administrative services and to our operating subsidiaries
significant operational services (including vessel maintenance,
crewing for some of our vessels, purchasing, shipyard
supervision, insurance and financial services) and other
technical, advisory and administrative services. Our operational
success and ability to execute our growth strategy depends
significantly upon Teekay Shipping Corporations
satisfactory performance of these services. Our business will be
harmed if Teekay Shipping Corporation fails to perform these
services satisfactorily or if Teekay Shipping Corporation stops
providing these services to us.
Our ability to compete for the transportation requirements of
LNG projects and to enter into new time charters and expand our
customer relationships depends largely on our ability to
leverage our relationship with Teekay Shipping Corporation and
its reputation and relationships in the shipping industry. If
Teekay Shipping Corporation suffers material damage to its
reputation or relationships, it may harm our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
renew existing charters upon their expiration; |
|
|
|
obtain new charters; |
|
|
|
successfully interact with shipyards during periods of shipyard
construction constraints; |
|
|
|
obtain financing on commercially acceptable terms; or |
|
|
|
maintain satisfactory relationships with our employees and
suppliers. |
If our ability to do any of the things described above is
impaired, it could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition and our
ability to make cash distributions.
Teekay Shipping Corporation is also incurring all costs for the
construction and delivery of the three RasGas II LNG
newbuildings, which we refer to as warehousing. Upon
their delivery, we will purchase all of the interest of Teekay
Shipping Corporation in the vessels at a price that will
reimburse Teekay Shipping Corporation for these costs and
compensate it for its average weighted cost of capital on the
construction payments. We may enter into similar arrangements
with Teekay Shipping Corporation in the future. If Teekay
Shipping Corporation fails to make construction payments for the
RasGas II newbuildings or other vessels that Teekay
Shipping Corporation warehouses for us, we could lose access to
the vessels as a result of the default or we may need to finance
these vessels before they begin operating and generating voyage
revenues, which could harm our business and reduce our ability
to make cash distributions.
25
|
|
|
Our growth depends on continued growth in demand for LNG
and LNG shipping. |
Our growth strategy focuses on expansion in the LNG shipping
sector. Accordingly, our growth depends on continued growth in
world and regional demand for LNG and LNG shipping, which could
be negatively affected by a number of factors, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
increases in the cost of natural gas derived from LNG relative
to the cost of natural gas generally; |
|
|
|
increases in the production of natural gas in areas linked by
pipelines to consuming areas, the extension of existing, or the
development of new, pipeline systems in markets we may serve, or
the conversion of existing non-natural gas pipelines to natural
gas pipelines in those markets; |
|
|
|
decreases in the consumption of natural gas due to increases in
its price relative to other energy sources or other factors
making consumption of natural gas less attractive; |
|
|
|
availability of new, alternative energy sources, including
compressed natural gas; and |
|
|
|
negative global or regional economic or political conditions,
particularly in LNG consuming regions, which could reduce energy
consumption or its growth. |
Reduced demand for LNG and LNG shipping would have a material
adverse effect on our future growth and could harm our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
Growth of the LNG market may be limited by infrastructure
constraints and community and environmental group resistance to
new LNG infrastructure over concerns about the environment,
safety and terrorism. |
A complete LNG project includes production, liquefaction,
regasification, storage and distribution facilities and LNG
carriers. Existing LNG projects and infrastructure are limited,
and new or expanded LNG projects are highly complex and
capital-intensive, with new projects often costing several
billion dollars. Many factors could negatively affect continued
development of LNG infrastructure or disrupt the supply of LNG,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
increases in interest rates or other events that may affect the
availability of sufficient financing for LNG projects on
commercially reasonable terms; |
|
|
|
decreases in the price of LNG, which might decrease the expected
returns relating to investments in LNG projects; |
|
|
|
the inability of project owners or operators to obtain
governmental approvals to construct or operate LNG facilities; |
|
|
|
local community resistance to proposed or existing LNG
facilities based on safety, environmental or security concerns; |
|
|
|
any significant explosion, spill or similar incident involving
an LNG facility or LNG carrier; |
|
|
|
labor or political unrest affecting existing or proposed areas
of LNG production; and |
|
|
|
capacity constraints at existing shipyards, which are expected
to continue until at least the end of 2008. |
We expect that as a result of the factors discussed above, some
of the proposals to expand existing or develop new LNG
liquefaction and regasification facilities will be abandoned or
significantly delayed. For example, until recently Bolivia had
suspended its LNG export program because of political unrest,
and an LNG project in Peru was delayed by problems in arranging
financing.
Explosions at an LNG plant in Algeria in January and August 2004
have also increased public concern about the safety of LNG
facilities. In addition, the proposed construction of new LNG
import terminals in some locations in North America has met with
significant community and environmental group resistance over
concerns about the environment, safety and terrorism.
26
If the LNG supply chain is disrupted or does not continue to
grow, or if a significant LNG explosion, spill or similar
incident occurs, it could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition and our
ability to make cash distributions.
|
|
|
Our growth depends on our ability to expand relationships
with existing customers and obtain new customers, for which we
face substantial competition. |
One of our principal objectives is to enter into additional
long-term, fixed-rate LNG time charters. The process of
obtaining new long-term LNG time charters is highly competitive
and generally involves an intensive screening process and
competitive bids, and often extends for several months. LNG
shipping contracts are awarded based upon a variety of factors
relating to the vessel operator, including:
|
|
|
|
|
shipping industry relationships and reputation for customer
service and safety; |
|
|
|
LNG shipping experience and quality of ship operations
(including cost effectiveness); |
|
|
|
quality and experience of seafaring crew; |
|
|
|
the ability to finance LNG carriers at competitive rates and
financial stability generally; |
|
|
|
relationships with shipyards and the ability to get suitable
berths; |
|
|
|
construction management experience, including the ability to
obtain on-time delivery of new vessels according to customer
specifications; |
|
|
|
willingness to accept operational risks pursuant to the charter,
such as allowing termination of the charter for force majeure
events; and |
|
|
|
competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price. |
We compete for providing marine transportation services for
potential LNG projects with a number of experienced companies,
including state-sponsored entities and major energy companies
affiliated with the LNG project requiring LNG shipping services.
Many of these competitors have significantly greater financial
resources than we do or Teekay Shipping Corporation does. We
anticipate that an increasing number of marine transportation
companies including many with strong reputations and
extensive resources and experience will enter the
LNG transportation sector. This increased competition may cause
greater price competition for time charters. As a result of
these factors, we may be unable to expand our relationships with
existing customers or to obtain new customers on a profitable
basis, if at all, which would have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition and
our ability to make cash distributions.
|
|
|
Delays in deliveries of newbuildings could harm our
operating results and lead to the termination of related time
charters. |
We have agreed to purchase Teekay Shipping Corporations
70% interest in Teekay Nakilat, which owns the three
RasGas II LNG newbuilding carriers, in connection with
their deliveries scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2006 and
the first half of 2007. The delivery of these vessels, or any
other newbuildings we may order, could be delayed, which would
delay our receipt of revenues under the time charters for the
vessels. In addition, under some of our charters if our delivery
of a vessel to our customer is delayed, we may be required to
pay liquidated damages in amounts equal to or, under some
charters, almost double, the hire rate during the delay. For
prolonged delays, the customer may terminate the time charter
and, in addition to the resulting loss of revenues, we may be
responsible for additional, substantial liquidated damages.
Our receipt of newbuildings could be delayed because of:
|
|
|
|
|
quality or engineering problems; |
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory
organization standards; |
27
|
|
|
|
|
work stoppages or other labor disturbances at the shipyard; |
|
|
|
bankruptcy or other financial crisis of the shipbuilder; |
|
|
|
a backlog of orders at the shipyard; |
|
|
|
political or economic disturbances in South Korea or Spain,
where the vessels are being built; |
|
|
|
weather interference or catastrophic event, such as a major
earthquake or fire; |
|
|
|
our requests for changes to the original vessel specifications; |
|
|
|
shortages of or delays in the receipt of necessary construction
materials, such as steel; |
|
|
|
our inability to finance the purchase of the vessels; or |
|
|
|
our inability to obtain requisite permits or approvals. |
If delivery of a vessel is materially delayed, it could
adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
|
|
|
We may have more difficulty entering into long-term,
fixed-rate time charters if an active short-term or spot LNG
shipping market develops. |
LNG shipping historically has been transacted with long-term,
fixed-rate time charters, usually with terms ranging from 20 to
25 years. One of our principal strategies is to enter into
additional long-term, fixed-rate LNG time charters. However, the
number of spot and short-term charters has been increasing, with
LNG charters under 12 months in duration growing from less
than 2% of the market in the late 1990s to almost 11% in 2003.
For example, substantially all LNG shipped into the Lake
Charles, Louisiana terminal in 2004 was shipped under short-term
charters. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that spot
and short-term charters could account for 15% to 20% of global
LNG shipping imports by 2013, with short-term charters occurring
primarily in the Atlantic region.
If an active spot or short-term market continues to develop, we
may have increased difficulty entering into long-term,
fixed-rate time charters for our LNG vessels and, as a result,
our cash flow may decrease and be less stable. In addition, an
active short-term or spot LNG market may require us to enter
into charters based on changing market prices, as opposed to
contracts based on a fixed rate, which could result in a
decrease in our cash flow in periods when the market price for
shipping LNG is depressed or insufficient funds are available to
cover our financing costs for related vessels.
|
|
|
Over time, vessel values may fluctuate substantially and,
if these values are lower at a time when we are attempting to
dispose of a vessel, we may incur a loss. |
Vessel values for LNG carriers and Suezmax oil tankers can
fluctuate substantially over time due to a number of different
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
prevailing economic conditions in natural gas, oil and energy
markets; |
|
|
|
a substantial or extended decline in demand for natural gas, LNG
or oil; |
|
|
|
increases in the supply of vessel capacity; and |
|
|
|
the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing vessels, as a
result of technological advances in vessel design or equipment,
changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or
standards, or otherwise. |
If a charter terminates, we may be unable to re-deploy the
vessel at attractive rates and, rather than continue to incur
costs to maintain and finance it, may seek to dispose of it. Our
inability to dispose of the vessel at a reasonable value could
result in a loss on its sale and adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
28
|
|
|
We may be unable to make or realize expected benefits from
acquisitions, and implementing our growth strategy through
acquisitions may harm our business, financial condition and
operating results. |
Our growth strategy includes selectively acquiring existing LNG
carriers or LNG shipping businesses. Historically, there have
been very few purchases of existing vessels and businesses in
the LNG shipping industry. Factors that may contribute to a
limited number of acquisition opportunities in the LNG industry
in the near term include the relatively small number of
independent LNG fleet owners and the limited number of LNG
carriers not subject to existing long-term charter contracts. In
addition, competition from other companies could reduce our
acquisition opportunities or cause us to pay higher prices.
Any acquisition of a vessel or business may not be profitable to
us at or after the time we acquire it and may not generate cash
flow sufficient to justify our investment. In addition, our
acquisition growth strategy exposes us to risks that may harm
our business, financial condition and operating results,
including risks that we may:
|
|
|
|
|
fail to realize anticipated benefits, such as new customer
relationships, cost-savings or cash flow enhancements; |
|
|
|
be unable to hire, train or retain qualified shore and seafaring
personnel to manage and operate our growing business and fleet; |
|
|
|
decrease our liquidity by using a significant portion of our
available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions; |
|
|
|
significantly increase our interest expense or financial
leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions; |
|
|
|
incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs
associated with the business or vessels acquired; or |
|
|
|
incur other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill
or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring
charges. |
Unlike newbuildings, existing vessels typically do not carry
warranties as to their condition. While we generally inspect
existing vessels prior to purchase, such an inspection would
normally not provide us with as much knowledge of a
vessels condition as we would possess if it had been built
for us and operated by us during its life. Repairs and
maintenance costs for existing vessels are difficult to predict
and may be substantially higher than for vessels we have
operated since they were built. These costs could decrease our
cash flow and reduce our liquidity.
|
|
|
Terrorist attacks, increased hostilities or war could lead
to further economic instability, increased costs and disruption
of our business. |
Terrorist attacks, such as the attacks that occurred in the
United States on September 11, 2001 and the bombings in
Spain on March 11, 2004 and in England on July 7,
2005, and the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and
other current and future conflicts, may adversely affect our
business, operating results, financial condition, ability to
raise capital and future growth. Continuing hostilities in the
Middle East may lead to additional armed conflicts or to further
acts of terrorism and civil disturbance in the United States,
Spain or elsewhere, which may contribute further to economic
instability and disruption of LNG and oil production and
distribution, which could result in reduced demand for our
services.
In addition, LNG and oil facilities, shipyards, vessels,
pipelines and oil and gas fields could be targets of future
terrorist attacks. Any such attacks could lead to, among other
things, bodily injury or loss of life, vessel or other property
damage, increased vessel operational costs, including insurance
costs, and the inability to transport LNG, natural gas and oil
to or from certain locations. Terrorist attacks, war or other
events beyond our control that adversely affect the
distribution, production or transportation of LNG or oil to be
shipped by us could entitle our customers to terminate our
charter contracts, which would harm our cash flow and our
business.
29
Terrorist attacks, or the perception that LNG facilities and LNG
carriers are potential terrorist targets, could materially and
adversely affect expansion of LNG infrastructure and the
continued supply of LNG to the United States and other
countries. Concern that LNG facilities may be targeted for
attack by terrorists has contributed to significant community
and environmental resistance to the construction of a number of
LNG facilities, primarily in North America. If a terrorist
incident involving an LNG facility or LNG carrier did occur, in
addition to the possible effects identified in the previous
paragraph, the incident may adversely affect construction of
additional LNG facilities in the United States and other
countries or the temporary or permanent closing of various LNG
facilities currently in operation.
|
|
|
Our substantial operations outside the United States
expose us to political, governmental and economic instability,
which could harm our operations. |
Because our operations are primarily conducted outside of the
United States, they may be affected by economic, political and
governmental conditions in the countries where we are engaged in
business or where our vessels are registered. Any disruption
caused by these factors could harm our business. In particular,
we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from shipping
LNG and oil from politically unstable regions. Past political
conflicts in these regions, particularly in the Arabian Gulf,
have included attacks on ships, mining of waterways and other
efforts to disrupt shipping in the area. In addition to acts of
terrorism, vessels trading in this and other regions have also
been subject, in limited instances, to piracy. Future
hostilities or other political instability in the Arabian Gulf
or other regions where we operate or may operate could have a
material adverse effect on the growth of our business, results
of operations and financial condition and our ability to make
cash distributions. For example, in 2001 Indonesian insurgents
forced a four-month shutdown of ExxonMobils ARCO LNG
liquefaction plant and in March 2004 tugboat workers conducted a
two-day strike that shut down operations at Trinidad and
Tobagos liquefaction facilities. In addition, tariffs,
trade embargoes and other economic sanctions by Spain, the
United States or other countries against countries in the Middle
East, Southeast Asia or elsewhere as a result of terrorist
attacks, hostilities or otherwise may limit trading activities
with those countries, which could also harm our business and
ability to make cash distributions.
|
|
|
Marine transportation is inherently risky, and an incident
involving significant loss of or environmental contamination by
any of our vessels could harm our reputation and
business. |
Our vessels and their cargoes are at risk of being damaged or
lost because of events such as:
|
|
|
|
|
marine disasters; |
|
|
|
bad weather; |
|
|
|
mechanical failures; |
|
|
|
grounding, fire, explosions and collisions; |
|
|
|
piracy; |
|
|
|
human error; and |
|
|
|
war and terrorism. |
An accident involving any of our vessels could result in any of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
death or injury to persons, loss of property or environmental
damage; |
|
|
|
delays in the delivery of cargo; |
|
|
|
loss of revenues from or termination of charter contracts; |
|
|
|
governmental fines, penalties or restrictions on conducting
business; |
|
|
|
higher insurance rates; and |
|
|
|
damage to our reputation and customer relationships generally. |
30
Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and operating results.
|
|
|
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may
occur to our property or result from our operations. |
The operation of LNG carriers and oil tankers is inherently
risky. Although we carry protection and indemnity insurance, all
risks may not be adequately insured against, and any particular
claim may not be paid. In addition, we do not carry insurance on
our Suezmax tankers covering the loss of revenues resulting from
vessel off-hire time based on its cost compared to our off-hire
experience. In the future, we may not continue to maintain
off-hire insurance for our LNG carriers. Any claims covered by
insurance would be subject to deductibles, and since it is
possible that a large number of claims may be brought, the
aggregate amount of these deductibles could be material. Certain
of our insurance coverage is maintained through mutual
protection and indemnity associations, and as a member of such
associations we may be required to make additional payments over
and above budgeted premiums if member claims exceed association
reserves.
We may be unable to procure adequate insurance coverage at
commercially reasonable rates in the future. For example, more
stringent environmental regulations have led in the past to
increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of
availability of, insurance against risks of environmental damage
or pollution. A catastrophic oil spill or marine disaster could
exceed our insurance coverage, which could harm our business,
financial condition and operating results. Any uninsured or
underinsured loss could harm our business and financial
condition. In addition, our insurance may be voidable by the
insurers as a result of certain of our actions, such as our
ships failing to maintain certification with applicable maritime
self-regulatory organizations.
Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist
attacks may also make certain types of insurance more difficult
for us to obtain. In addition, the insurance that may be
available to us may be significantly more expensive than our
existing coverage.
|
|
|
The marine energy transportation industry is subject to
substantial environmental and other regulations, which may
significantly limit our operations or increase our
expenses. |
Our operations are affected by extensive and changing
environmental protection laws and other regulations and
international conventions. We have incurred, and expect to
continue to incur, substantial expenses in complying with these
laws and regulations, including expenses for vessel
modifications and changes in operating procedures. Additional
laws and regulations may be adopted that could limit our ability
to do business or further increase our costs, which could harm
our business. In addition, failure to comply with applicable
laws and regulations may result in administrative and civil
penalties, criminal sanctions or the suspension or termination
of our operations.
The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (or
OPA 90), for instance, increased expenses for us and
others in our industry. OPA 90 provides for potentially
unlimited joint, several and strict liability for owners,
operators and demise or bareboat charterers for oil pollution
and related damages in U.S. waters, which include the
U.S. territorial sea and the 200-nautical mile exclusive
economic zone around the United States. OPA 90 applies to
discharges of any oil from a vessel, including discharges of oil
tanker cargoes and discharges of fuel and lubricants from an oil
tanker or LNG carrier. To comply with OPA 90, vessel owners
generally incur increased costs in meeting additional
maintenance and inspection requirements, in developing
contingency arrangements for potential spills and in obtaining
required insurance coverage. OPA 90 contains financial
responsibility requirements for vessels operating in
U.S. waters and requires vessel owners and operators to
establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence
of insurance or of qualification as a self-insurer or other
acceptable evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to
meet certain potential liabilities under OPA 90 and the
U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (or CERCLA), which imposes similar
liabilities upon owners, operators and bareboat charterers of
vessels from which a discharge of hazardous
31
substances (other than oil) occurs. While LNG should not
be considered a hazardous substance under CERCLA, additives to
fuel oil or lubricants used on LNG carriers might fall within
its scope. Under OPA 90 and CERCLA, owners, operators and
bareboat charterers are jointly, severally and strictly liable
for costs of cleanup and damages resulting from a discharge or
threatened discharge within U.S. waters. This means we may
be subject to liability even if we are not negligent or at fault.
Most states in the United States bordering on a navigable
waterway have enacted legislation providing for potentially
unlimited strict liability without regard to fault for the
discharge of pollutants within their waters. An oil spill or
other event could result in significant liability, including
fines, penalties, criminal liability and costs for natural
resource damages. The potential for these releases could
increase to the extent we increase our operations in
U.S. waters.
OPA 90 and CERCLA do not preclude claimants from seeking damages
for the discharge of oil and hazardous substances under other
applicable law, including maritime tort law. Such claims could
include attempts to characterize seaborne transportation of LNG
as an ultra-hazardous activity, which attempts, if successful,
would lead to our being strictly liable for damages resulting
from that activity.
In addition, we believe that the heightened environmental,
quality and security concerns of insurance underwriters,
regulators and charterers will generally lead to additional
regulatory requirements, including enhanced risk assessment and
security requirements and greater inspection and safety
requirements on all vessels in the LNG carrier and oil tanker
markets.
|
|
|
Exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations will
result in fluctuations in our cash flows and operating
results. |
We are paid in Euros under some of our charters, and a majority
of our vessel operating expenses and general and administrative
expenses are denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function
of the nationality of our crew and administrative staff. We also
make payments under two Euro-denominated term loans. If the
amount of our Euro-denominated obligations exceeds our
Euro-denominated revenues, we must convert other currencies,
primarily the U.S. Dollar, into Euros. An increase in the
strength of the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar would
require us to convert more U.S. Dollars to Euros to satisfy
those obligations, which would cause us to have less cash
available for distribution. In addition, if we do not have
sufficient U.S. Dollars, we may be required to convert
Euros into U.S. Dollars for distributions to unitholders.
An increase in the strength of the U.S. Dollar relative to
the Euro could cause us to have less cash available for
distribution in this circumstance. We have not entered into
currency swaps or forward contracts or similar derivatives to
mitigate this risk.
Because we report our operating results in U.S. Dollars,
changes in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to the
Euro also result in fluctuations in our reported revenues and
earnings. In addition, under U.S. accounting guidelines,
all foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities
such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
restricted cash, accounts payable, long-term debt and capital
lease obligations are revalued and reported based on the
prevailing exchange rate at the end of the period. This
revaluation causes us to report significant non-monetary foreign
currency exchange gains and losses each period. The primary
source for these gains and losses is our Euro-denominated term
loans. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, we reported foreign currency
exchange losses of $44.3 million, $71.5 million and
$16.1 million, respectively. For the six months ended
June 30, 2005, we reported a foreign currency exchange gain
of $46.8 million.
|
|
|
Many of our seafaring employees are covered by collective
bargaining agreements and the failure to renew those agreements
or any future labor agreements may disrupt our operations and
adversely affect our cash flows. |
A significant portion of our seafarers, and the seafarers
employed by Teekay Shipping Corporation and its other affiliates
that crew our vessels, are employed under collective bargaining
agreements, which expire at varying times through 2008. The
collective bargaining agreement for our Spanish Suezmax tanker
crew members (covering five Suezmax tankers) expires at the end
of 2005. We may be subject to similar
32
labor agreements in the future. We may be subject to labor
disruptions in the future if our relationships deteriorate with
our seafarers or the unions that represent them. Our collective
bargaining agreements may not prevent labor disruptions,
particularly when the agreements are being renegotiated. Any
labor disruptions could harm our operations and could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition and our ability to make cash
distributions.
|
|
|
Due to our lack of diversification, adverse developments
in our LNG or oil marine transportation business could reduce
our ability to make distributions to our unitholders. |
We rely exclusively on the cash flow generated from our LNG
carriers and Suezmax oil tankers that operate in the LNG and oil
marine transportation business. Due to our lack of
diversification, an adverse development in the LNG or oil
shipping industry would have a significantly greater impact on
our financial condition and results of operations than if we
maintained more diverse assets or lines of business.
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates may engage
in competition with us. |
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates may engage in
competition with us. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Teekay
Shipping Corporation and its controlled affiliates (other than
us and our subsidiaries) generally have agreed not to own,
operate or charter LNG carriers without the consent of our
general partner. The omnibus agreement, however, allows Teekay
Shipping Corporation or any of such controlled affiliates to:
|
|
|
|
|
acquire LNG carriers and related time charters as part of a
business if a majority of the value of the total assets or
business acquired is not attributable to the LNG carriers and
time charters, as determined in good faith by the board of
directors of Teekay Shipping Corporation; however, if at any
time Teekay Shipping Corporation completes such an acquisition,
it must offer to sell the LNG carriers and related time charters
to us for their fair market value plus any additional tax or
other similar costs to Teekay Shipping Corporation that would be
required to transfer the LNG carriers and time charters to us
separately from the acquired business; or |
|
|
|
own, operate and charter LNG carriers that relate to a bid or
award for a proposed LNG project that Teekay Shipping
Corporation or any of its subsidiaries has submitted or
hereafter submits or receives; however, at least 180 days
prior to the scheduled delivery date of any such LNG carrier,
Teekay Shipping Corporation must offer to sell the LNG carrier
and related time charter to us, with the vessel valued at its
fully-built-up cost, which represents the aggregate
expenditures incurred (or to be incurred prior to delivery to
us) by Teekay Shipping Corporation to acquire or construct and
bring such LNG carrier to the condition and location necessary
for our intended use. |
If we decline the offer to purchase the LNG carriers and time
charters described above, Teekay Shipping Corporation may own
and operate the LNG carriers, but may not expand that portion of
its business.
In addition, pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Teekay Shipping
Corporation or any of its controlled affiliates (other than us
and our subsidiaries) may:
|
|
|
|
|
acquire, operate or charter LNG carriers if our general partner
has previously advised Teekay Shipping Corporation that the
board of directors of our general partner has elected, with the
approval of its conflicts committee, not to cause us or our
subsidiaries to acquire or operate the carriers; |
|
|
|
own and operate the three RasGas II LNG newbuilding
carriers and related time charters if we fail to perform our
obligation to purchase such vessels under our agreement with
Teekay Shipping Corporation (please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Agreement to Purchase RasGas II Interest); |
33
|
|
|
|
|
acquire up to a 9.9% equity ownership, voting or profit
participation interest in any publicly traded company that owns
or operates LNG carriers; and |
|
|
|
provide ship management services relating to LNG carriers. |
If there is a change of control of Teekay Shipping Corporation,
the non-competition provisions of the omnibus agreement may
terminate, which termination could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition and our ability to make cash distributions. Please
read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Omnibus Agreement.
|
|
|
Our general partner and its other affiliates have
conflicts of interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may
permit them to favor their own interests to your
detriment. |
Following this offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation, which owns
and controls our general partner, will indirectly own the 2%
general partner interest and a 66.9% limited partner interest in
us. Conflicts of interest may arise between Teekay Shipping
Corporation and its affiliates, including our general partner,
on the one hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand.
As a result of these conflicts, our general partner may favor
its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over the
interests of our unitholders. These conflicts include, among
others, the following situations:
|
|
|
|
|
neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement
requires our general partner or Teekay Shipping Corporation to
pursue a business strategy that favors us or utilizes our
assets, and Teekay Shipping Corporations officers and
directors have a fiduciary duty to make decisions in the best
interests of the stockholders of Teekay Shipping Corporation,
which may be contrary to our interests; |
|
|
|
the executive officers and three of the directors of our general
partner also serve as executive officers or directors of Teekay
Shipping Corporation and another director of our general partner
is employed by an affiliate of Teekay Shipping Corporation; |
|
|
|
our general partner is allowed to take into account the
interests of parties other than us, such as Teekay Shipping
Corporation, in resolving conflicts of interest, which has the
effect of limiting its fiduciary duty to our unitholders; |
|
|
|
our general partner has limited its liability and reduced its
fiduciary duties under the laws of the Marshall Islands, while
also restricting the remedies available to our unitholders, and
as a result of purchasing common units, unitholders are treated
as having agreed to the modified standard of fiduciary duties
and to certain actions that may be taken by our general partner,
all as set forth in the partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
our general partner determines the amount and timing of asset
purchases and sales, capital expenditures, borrowings, issuances
of additional partnership securities and reserves, each of which
can affect the amount of cash that is available for distribution
to our unitholders; |
|
|
|
in some instances, our general partner may cause us to borrow
funds in order to permit the payment of cash distributions, even
if the purpose or effect of the borrowing is to make a
distribution on the subordinated units or to make incentive
distributions or to accelerate the expiration of the
subordination period; |
|
|
|
our general partner determines which costs incurred by it and
its affiliates are reimbursable by us; |
|
|
|
our partnership agreement does not restrict our general partner
from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services
rendered to us on terms that are fair and reasonable or entering
into additional contractual arrangements with any of these
entities on our behalf; |
|
|
|
our general partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed
to us by it and its affiliates; and |
|
|
|
our general partner decides whether to retain separate counsel,
accountants or others to perform services for us. |
34
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Omnibus Agreement,
Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties and
The Partnership Agreement.
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement limits our general
partners fiduciary duties to our unitholders and restricts
the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our
general partner. |
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the
standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held
by Marshall Islands law. For example, our partnership agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its
individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our
general partner. Where our partnership agreement permits, our
general partner may consider only the interests and factors that
it desires, and in such cases it has no duty or obligation to
give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting
us, our affiliates or any limited partner; |
|
|
|
provides that our general partner is entitled to make other
decisions in good faith if it reasonably believes
that the decision is in our best interests; |
|
|
|
generally provides that affiliated transactions and resolutions
of conflicts of interest not approved by the conflicts committee
of the board of directors of our general partner and not
involving a vote of unitholders must be on terms no less
favorable to us than those generally being provided to or
available from unrelated third parties or be fair and
reasonable to us and that, in determining whether a
transaction or resolution is fair and reasonable,
our general partner may consider the totality of the
relationships between the parties involved, including other
transactions that may be particularly advantageous or beneficial
to us; and |
|
|
|
provides that our general partner and its officers and directors
will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our limited
partners or assignees for any acts or omissions unless there has
been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of
competent jurisdiction determining that the general partner or
those other persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud,
willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
In order to become a limited partner of our partnership, a
common unitholder is required to agree to be bound by the
provisions in the partnership agreement, including the
provisions discussed above. Please read Conflicts of
Interest and Fiduciary Duties Fiduciary Duties.
|
|
|
Fees and cost reimbursements, which our general partner
determines for services provided to us and certain of our
subsidiaries, are substantial and reduce our cash available for
distribution to you. |
Prior to making any distribution on the common units, we pay
fees for services provided to us and certain of our subsidiaries
by certain subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation, and we
reimburse our general partner for all expenses it incurs on our
behalf. These fees are negotiated on our behalf by our general
partner, and our general partner also determines the amounts it
is reimbursed. These fees and expenses include all costs
incurred in providing certain advisory, ship management,
technical and administrative services to us and certain of our
subsidiaries, including services rendered to us pursuant to the
agreements described below under Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Advisory and
Administrative Services Agreements. In addition, our
general partner and its affiliates may provide us with other
services for which the general partner or its affiliates may
charge us fees, and we may pay Teekay Shipping Corporation
incentive fees pursuant to the omnibus agreement
with it to reward and motivate Teekay Shipping Corporation for
pursuing LNG projects that we may elect to undertake. Please
read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions and Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary
Duties Conflicts of Interest. The payment of
fees to Teekay Shipping Corporation and its subsidiaries and
reimbursement of expenses to our general partner could adversely
affect our ability to pay cash distributions to you.
35
|
|
|
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot remove
our general partner without its consent. |
Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders
have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our
business and, therefore, limited ability to influence
managements decisions regarding our business. Unitholders
did not elect our general partner or its board of directors and
will have no right to elect our general partner or its board of
directors on an annual or other continuing basis. The board of
directors of our general partner is chosen by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. Furthermore, if the unitholders are dissatisfied
with the performance of our general partner, they will have
little ability to remove our general partner. As a result of
these limitations, the price at which the common units will
trade could be diminished because of the absence or reduction of
a takeover premium in the trading price.
The unitholders will be unable initially to remove the general
partner without its consent because the general partner and its
affiliates will own sufficient units upon completion of this
offering to be able to prevent its removal. The vote of the
holders of at least
662/3%
of all outstanding units voting together as a single class is
required to remove the general partner. Following the closing of
this offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation will own 68.3% of the
units. Also, if the general partner is removed without cause
during the subordination period and units held by the general
partner and Teekay Shipping Corporation are not voted in favor
of that removal, all remaining subordinated units will
automatically convert into common units and any existing
arrearages on the common units will be extinguished. A removal
of the general partner under these circumstances would adversely
affect the common units by prematurely eliminating their
distribution and liquidation preference over the subordinated
units, which would otherwise have continued until we had met
certain distribution and performance tests. Cause is narrowly
defined to mean that a court of competent jurisdiction has
entered a final, non-appealable judgment finding the general
partner liable for actual fraud or willful or wanton misconduct
in its capacity as our general partner. Cause does not include
most cases of charges of poor management of the business, so the
removal of the general partner because of the unitholders
dissatisfaction with the general partners performance in
managing our partnership will most likely result in the
termination of the subordination period.
Furthermore, unitholders voting rights are further
restricted by the partnership agreement provision providing that
any units held by a person that owns 20% or more of any class of
units then outstanding, other than the general partner, its
affiliates, their transferees, and persons who acquired such
units with the prior approval of the board of directors of the
general partner, cannot vote on any matter. Our partnership
agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of
unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our
operations, as well as other provisions limiting the
unitholders ability to influence the manner or direction
of management.
|
|
|
The control of our general partner may be transferred to a
third party without unitholder consent. |
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to
a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially
all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders. In
addition, our partnership agreement does not restrict the
ability of the members of our general partner from transferring
their respective membership interests in our general partner to
a third party. In the event of any such transfer, the new
members of our general partner would be in a position to replace
the board of directors and officers of our general partner with
their own choices and to control the decisions taken by the
board of directors and officers.
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$13.37 per common unit. |
The estimated offering price for this offering of
$30.11 per common unit (based on the closing price of our
common units on November 11, 2005) exceeds the pro forma
net tangible book value of $16.74 per common unit. Based on
the estimated offering price, you will incur immediate and
substantial dilution of $13.37 per common unit. This
dilution results primarily because the assets contributed by our
general partner and its affiliates are recorded at their
historical cost, and not their fair value, in accordance with
GAAP. Please read Dilution.
36
|
|
|
We may issue additional common units without your
approval, which would dilute your ownership interests. |
Our general partner, without the approval of our unitholders,
may cause us to issue an unlimited number of additional units or
other equity securities.
The issuance by us of additional common units or other equity
securities of equal or senior rank will have the following
effects:
|
|
|
|
|
our unitholders proportionate ownership interest in us
will decrease; |
|
|
|
the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may
decrease; |
|
|
|
because a lower percentage of total outstanding units will be
subordinated units, the risk that a shortfall in the payment of
the minimum quarterly distribution will be borne by our common
unitholders will increase; |
|
|
|
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit
may be diminished; |
|
|
|
the market price of the common units may decline; and |
|
|
|
the ratio of taxable income to distributions may increase. |
|
|
|
In establishing cash reserves, our general partner may
reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to
you. |
Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct
from operating surplus cash reserves that it determines are
necessary to fund our future operating expenditures. These
reserves affect the amount of cash available for distribution.
Our general partner may establish reserves for distributions on
the subordinated units, but only if those reserves will not
prevent us from distributing the full minimum quarterly
distribution, plus any arrearages, on the common units for the
following four quarters. The partnership agreement requires our
general partner each quarter to deduct from operating surplus
estimated maintenance capital expenditures, as opposed to actual
expenditures, which could reduce the amount of available cash
for distribution as described above in Risks Inherent in
Our Business We make substantial capital
expenditures to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet,
which reduce our cash available for distribution. In addition,
each quarter our general partner is required to deduct estimated
maintenance capital expenditures from operating surplus, which
may result in less cash available to unitholders than if actual
maintenance capital expenditures were deducted.
|
|
|
Our general partner has a limited call right that may
require you to sell your common units at an undesirable time or
price. |
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the common units, our general partner will have the
right, but not the obligation, which it may assign to any of its
affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of
the common units held by unaffiliated persons at a price not
less than their then-current market price. As a result, you may
be required to sell your common units at an undesirable time or
price and may not receive any return on your investment. You may
also incur a tax liability upon a sale of your units. For
additional information about the limited call right, please read
The Partnership Agreement Limited Call
Right.
At the completion of this offering and assuming no exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option, Teekay Shipping
Corporation, an affiliate of our general partner, will own 44.5%
of the common units. At the end of the subordination period,
assuming no additional issuances of common units, no exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option and conversion of
our subordinated units into common
37
units, Teekay Shipping Corporation will own 68.3% of the common
units. Teekay Shipping Corporation will also acquire additional
common units if:
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner determines to pay a portion of the purchase
price for the Suezmax tankers and related assets we will acquire
from Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of this
offering with our common units, as described in Use of
Proceeds; or |
|
|
|
in connection with the sale to us of its 70% interest in Teekay
Nakilat, which owns the three RasGas II LNG newbuilding
carriers, Teekay Shipping Corporation elects to receive common
units in satisfaction of the estimated $92.8 million cash
portion of the purchase price for that ownership interest. |
Accordingly, after subordinated units are converted to common
units our general partner and its affiliates may own a
sufficient percentage of our common units to enable our general
partner to exercise its limited call right. Please read
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase Suezmax Tankers
and Time Charters and Agreement to Purchase
RasGas II Interest.
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of
unitholders owning 20% or more of our common units. |
Our partnership agreement restricts unitholders voting
rights by providing that any units held by a person that owns
20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, other than
our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees and
persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of the
board of directors of our general partner, cannot vote on any
matter. The partnership agreement also contains provisions
limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to
acquire information about our operations, as well as other
provisions limiting the unitholders ability to influence
the manner or direction of management.
|
|
|
You may not have limited liability if a court finds that
unitholder action constitutes control of our business. |
As a limited partner in a partnership organized under the laws
of the Marshall Islands, you could be held liable for our
obligations to the same extent as a general partner if you
participate in the control of our business. Our
general partner generally has unlimited liability for the
obligations of the partnership, such as its debts and
environmental liabilities, except for those contractual
obligations of the partnership that are expressly made without
recourse to our general partner. In addition, the Marshall
Islands Limited Partnership Act (or Marshall Islands Act)
provides that, under some circumstances, a unitholder may be
liable to us for the amount of a distribution for a period of
three years from the date of the distribution. In addition, the
limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner
interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not
been clearly established in some jurisdictions in which we do
business. Please read The Partnership
Agreement Limited Liability for a discussion
of the implications of the limitations on liability to a
unitholder.
|
|
|
Our financing agreements will contain operating and
financial restrictions which may restrict our business and
financing activities. |
The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our
financing arrangements and any future financing agreements could
adversely affect our ability to finance future operations or
capital needs or to engage, expand or pursue our business
activities. For example, the arrangements may restrict our
ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur or guarantee indebtedness; |
|
|
|
change ownership or structure, including mergers,
consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions; |
|
|
|
make dividends or distributions; |
|
|
|
make capital expenditures in excess of specified levels; |
38
|
|
|
|
|
make certain negative pledges and grant certain liens; |
|
|
|
sell, transfer, assign or convey assets; |
|
|
|
make certain loans and investments; and |
|
|
|
enter into a new line of business. |
In addition, some of our financing arrangements require our
subsidiaries to maintain restricted cash deposits and maintain
minimal levels of tangible net worth. Our ability to comply with
the covenants and restrictions contained in our debt instruments
may be affected by events beyond our control, including
prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If
market or other economic conditions deteriorate, our ability to
comply with these covenants may be impaired. If we are in breach
of any of the restrictions, covenants, ratios or tests in our
financing agreements, a significant portion of our obligations
may become immediately due and payable, and our lenders
commitment to make further loans to us may terminate. We might
not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these
accelerated payments. In addition, our obligations under an
existing revolving credit facility are secured by certain of our
assets, and if we are unable to repay our debt under the credit
facility, the lenders could seek to foreclose on those assets.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation Liquidity and
Capital Resources Covenants and Other Restrictions
in Our Financing Agreements and Credit
Facilities.
|
|
|
Restrictions in our debt agreements may prevent us from
paying distributions. |
Our payment of principal and interest on the debt and capital
lease obligations will reduce cash available for distribution on
our units. In addition, a number of our financing agreements
prohibit the payment of distributions upon the occurrence of the
following events, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to pay any principal, interest, fees, expenses or other
amounts when due; |
|
|
|
default under any vessel mortgage; |
|
|
|
failure to notify the lenders of any material oil spill or
discharge of hazardous material, or of any action or claim
related thereto; |
|
|
|
breach or lapse of any insurance with respect to the vessels; |
|
|
|
breach of certain financial covenants; |
|
|
|
failure to observe any other agreement, security instrument,
obligation or covenant beyond specified cure periods in certain
cases; |
|
|
|
default under other indebtedness of our operating company, our
general partner or any of our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
bankruptcy or insolvency events involving us, our general
partner or any of our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
failure of any representation or warranty to be materially
correct; |
|
|
|
a change of control, as defined in the applicable
agreement; and |
|
|
|
a material adverse effect, as defined in the applicable
agreement, occurs relating to us or our business. |
We anticipate that any subsequent refinancing of our current
debt or any new debt will have similar restrictions. For more
information regarding our financing arrangements, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Covenants and Other Restrictions
in Our Financing Agreements.
|
|
|
We can borrow money to pay distributions, which would
reduce the amount of credit available to operate our
business. |
Our partnership agreement allows us to make working capital
borrowings to pay distributions. Accordingly, we can make
distributions on all our units even though cash generated by our
operations may
39
not be sufficient to pay such distributions. We are required to
reduce all working capital borrowings for this purpose under our
revolving credit agreement to zero for a period of at least 15
consecutive days once each 12-month period. Any working capital
borrowings by us to make distributions will reduce the amount of
working capital borrowings we can make for operating our
business. For more information, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Credit Facility.
|
|
|
Unitholders may have liability to repay
distributions. |
Under some circumstances, unitholders may have to repay amounts
wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under the Marshall
Islands Act, we may not make a distribution to you if the
distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair
value of our assets. Marshall Islands law provides that for a
period of three years from the date of the impermissible
distribution limited partners who received the distribution and
who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated
Marshall Islands law will be liable to the limited partnership
for the distribution amount. Assignees of partnership interests
who become limited partners are liable for the obligations of
the assignor to make contributions to the partnership that are
known to the assignee at the time it became a limited partner
and for unknown obligations if the liabilities could be
determined from the partnership agreement. Liabilities to
partners on account of their partnership interest and
liabilities that are non-recourse to the partnership are not
counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is
permitted.
|
|
|
We have been organized as a limited partnership under the
laws of the Republic of The Marshall Islands, which does not
have a well-developed body of partnership law. |
Our partnership affairs are governed by our partnership
agreement and by the Marshall Islands Act. The provisions of the
Marshall Islands Act resemble provisions of the limited
partnership laws of a number of states in the United States,
most notably Delaware. The Marshall Islands Act also provides
that it is to be interpreted according to the non-statutory law
of the State of Delaware. There have been, however, few, if any,
court cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the Marshall
Islands Act, in contrast to Delaware, which has a fairly
well-developed body of case law interpreting its limited
partnership statute. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether
Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as the
courts in Delaware. For example, the rights of our unitholders
and the fiduciary responsibilities of our general partner under
Marshall Islands law are not as clearly established as under
judicial precedent in existence in Delaware. As a result,
unitholders may have more difficulty in protecting their
interests in the face of actions by our general partner and its
officers and directors than would unitholders of a limited
partnership formed in the United States.
|
|
|
Because we are organized under the laws of the Marshall
Islands, it may be difficult to serve us with legal process or
enforce judgments against us, our directors or our
management. |
We are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, and all
of our assets are located outside of the United States. Our
business is operated primarily from our offices in the Bahamas
and Spain. In addition, our general partner is a Marshall
Islands limited liability company and all but four of its
directors and officers are non-residents of the United States,
and all or a substantial portion of the assets of these
non-residents are located outside the United States. As a
result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an
action against us or against these individuals in the United
States if you believe that your rights have been infringed under
securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in
bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Marshall
Islands and of other jurisdictions may prevent or restrict you
from enforcing a judgment against our assets or the assets of
our general partner or its directors and officers. For more
information regarding the relevant laws of the Marshall Islands,
please read Service of Process and Enforcement of Civil
Liabilities.
40
Tax Risks
In addition to the following risk factors, you should read
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
for a more complete discussion of expected material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and
disposing of common units.
|
|
|
You may be required to pay U.S. taxes on your share
of our income even if you do not receive any cash distributions
from us. |
Assuming that you are a U.S. citizen, resident or other
U.S. taxpayer, you will be required to pay
U.S. federal income taxes and, in some cases,
U.S. state and local income taxes on your share of our
taxable income, whether or not you receive cash distributions
from us. You may not receive cash distributions from us equal to
your share of our taxable income or even equal to the actual tax
liability that results from your share of our taxable income.
|
|
|
Because distributions may reduce your tax basis in our
common units, you may realize greater gain on the disposition of
your units than you may otherwise expect, and you may have a tax
gain even if the price you receive is less than your original
cost. |
If you sell your common units, you will recognize gain or loss
for U.S. federal income tax purposes that is equal to the
difference between the amount realized and your tax basis in
those common units. Prior distributions to you in excess of the
total net taxable income you were allocated decrease your tax
basis and will, in effect, become taxable income to you if your
common units are sold at a price greater than your tax basis,
even if the price you receive is less than your original cost.
Assuming we are not treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, a substantial portion of
the amount realized on a sale of units, whether or not
representing gain, may be ordinary income to you.
|
|
|
The after-tax benefit of an investment in the common units
may be reduced if we cease to be treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
The anticipated after-tax benefit of an investment in the common
units may be reduced if we cease to be treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
If we cease to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, we would be treated as becoming a
corporation for such purposes, and you could suffer material
adverse tax or economic consequences, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The ratio of taxable income to distributions with respect to
your units would increase because items would not be allocated
to you to account for any differences between the fair market
value and the basis of our assets at the time of the offering.
Please read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Consequences of Unit
Ownership Allocation of Income Gain, Loss and
Deduction. |
|
|
|
You may recognize income or gain on any change in our status
from a partnership to a corporation that occurs while you hold
units. Please read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Possible Classification as a
Corporation. |
|
|
|
We would not be permitted to adjust the tax basis of a secondary
market purchaser in our assets under Section 743(b) of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as described below
under Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Consequences of Unit
Ownership Section 754 Election. As a
result, a person who purchases common units from you in the
market may realize materially more taxable income each year with
respect to the units if we are treated as a corporation than if
we are treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. This could reduce the value of your common units. |
|
|
|
You would not be entitled to claim any credit against your
U.S. federal income tax liability for non-U.S. income
tax liabilities incurred by us if we are treated as a
corporation for U.S. federal |
41
|
|
|
|
|
income tax purposes. Please read Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences Possible
Classification as a Corporation. |
|
|
|
If we fail to qualify for an exemption from U.S. tax on the
U.S. source portion of our income attributable to
transportation that begins or ends (but not both) in the United
States, we will be subject to U.S. tax on such income on a
gross basis (that is, without any allowance for deductions) at a
rate of 4%. The imposition of this tax would have a negative
effect on our business and would result in decreased cash
available for distribution to you. Please read Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences Possible
Classification as a Corporation Taxation of
Operating Income. |
|
|
|
We also may be considered a passive foreign investment company
(or PFIC) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Please read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Possible Classification as a
Corporation Consequences of Possible PFIC
Classification. |
|
|
|
U.S. tax-exempt entities and non-U.S. persons
face unique U.S. tax issues from owning common units that
may result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to them. |
Investments in common units by U.S. tax-exempt entities,
including individual retirement accounts (known as IRAs), other
retirements plans and non-U.S. persons raise issues unique
to them. Assuming we are classified as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, virtually all of our
income allocated to organizations exempt from U.S. federal
income tax will be unrelated business taxable income and
generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax. In
addition, non-U.S. persons may be subject to a 4% U.S.
federal income tax on the U.S. source portion of our gross
income attributable to transportation that begins or ends in the
United States, or distributions to them may be reduced on
account of withholding of U.S. federal income tax by us in
the event we are treated as having a fixed place of business in
the United States or otherwise earn U.S. effectively
connected income, unless an exemption applies and they file
U.S. federal income tax returns to claim such exemption.
|
|
|
The sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital or
profits interests in any 12-month period will result in the
termination of our partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. |
We will be considered to have been terminated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes if there is a sale or
exchange of 50% or more of the total interests in our capital or
profits within any 12-month period. Our termination would, among
other things, result in the closing of our taxable year for all
unitholders and could result in a deferral of depreciation
deductions allowable in computing our taxable income. Please
read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Disposition of Common Units
Constructive Termination.
|
|
|
You may be subject to income tax in one or more
non-U.S. countries, including Canada, as a result of owning
our common units if, under the laws of any such country, we are
considered to be carrying on business there. Such laws may
require you to file a tax return with, and pay taxes to, those
countries. Any foreign taxes imposed on us or any of our
subsidiaries will reduce our cash available for distribution to
you. |
We intend that our affairs and the business of each of our
subsidiaries is conducted and operated in a manner that
minimizes foreign income taxes imposed upon us and our
subsidiaries or which may be imposed upon you as a result of
owning our common units. However, there is a risk that you will
be subject to tax in one or more countries, including Canada, as
a result of owning our common units if, under the laws of any
such country, we are considered to be carrying on business
there. If you are subject to tax in any such country, you may be
required to file a tax return with, and pay taxes to, that
country based on your allocable share of our income. We may be
required to reduce distributions to you on account of any
withholding obligations imposed upon us by that country in
respect of such allocation to you. The United States may not
allow a tax credit for any foreign income taxes that you
directly or indirectly incur. Any foreign taxes imposed on us or
any of our subsidiaries will reduce our cash available for you.
Please read Non-United States Tax Consequences.
42
USE OF PROCEEDS
Based on an assumed offering price of $30.11 per unit (the
closing price of our common units on November 11, 2005),
our estimated net proceeds from the sale of 4,000,000 common
units offered by this prospectus will be approximately
$115.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions but before paying estimated offering expenses. In
addition, our general partner will make a contribution to us of
$2.5 million, based on the assumed offering price, to
maintain its 2% general partner interest in us.
We intend to apply the net proceeds from this offering and from
our general partners contribution to us towards the
$180 million purchase price for the three Suezmax tankers
and related time charters we have agreed to purchase from Teekay
Shipping Corporation upon the closing of this offering. We will
pay the balance of the purchase price with borrowings from our
existing $100 million credit facility, cash balances or a
combination of both.
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option, we
will use the net proceeds to repay amounts borrowed under our
credit facility to purchase the vessels or for general
partnership purposes.
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase Suezmax Tankers
and Time Charters for more information on our agreement to
purchase the three Suezmax tankers.
43
CAPITALIZATION
The following table shows:
|
|
|
|
|
our historical capitalization as of June 30, 2005; and |
|
|
|
|
our as adjusted capitalization as of June 30, 2005,
adjusted to reflect the offering of the common units at an
assumed offering price of $30.11 per unit (the closing price of
our common units on November 11, 2005), and the application
of the estimated net proceeds we will receive in this offering
in the manner described under Use of Proceeds on the
preceding page. |
|
This table is derived from and should be read together with our
historical consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes. You should also read this table in
conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
55,875 |
|
|
$ |
27,875 |
|
Restricted
cash(1)
|
|
|
387,040 |
|
|
|
387,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and restricted cash
|
|
$ |
442,915 |
|
|
$ |
414,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
403,635 |
|
|
|
438,288 |
|
|
Long-term obligation under capital
leases(1)
|
|
|
561,919 |
|
|
|
561,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
965,554 |
|
|
|
1,000,207 |
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners equity
|
|
|
682,852 |
|
|
|
800,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
1,648,406 |
|
|
$ |
1,800,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Under certain capital lease arrangements, we maintain restricted
cash deposits that, together with interest earned on the
deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the
capital leases. The interest we receive from those deposits is
used solely to pay interest associated with the capital leases,
and the amount of interest we receive approximates the amount of
interest we pay on the capital leases. |
44
DILUTION
Dilution is the amount by which the offering price will exceed
the net tangible book value per common unit after this offering.
Assuming an offering price of $30.11 per common unit (the
closing price of our common units on November 11, 2005), on
a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, after giving effect
to this offering of common units and the application of the net
proceeds we will receive in this offering as described under
Use of Proceeds above, our net tangible book value
would have been $587.1 million, or $16.74 per common
unit. Purchasers of common units in this offering will
experience substantial and immediate dilution in net tangible
book value per common unit for financial accounting purposes, as
illustrated in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed offering price per common unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30.11 |
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per common unit before this
offering(1)
|
|
$ |
15.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per common unit attributable
to purchasers in this offering
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Pro forma net tangible book value per common unit after
this offering(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate dilution in net tangible book value per common unit to
purchasers in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Determined by dividing the total number of our units (15,638,072
common units, 14,734,572 subordinated units and the 2% general
partner interest, which has a dilutive effect equivalent to
619,850 units) outstanding as of June 30, 2005 into
our net tangible book value before this offering. The dilutive
effect of the general partners interest was determined by
multiplying the total number of units outstanding as of
June 30, 2005 (i.e., the total number of common and
subordinated units outstanding divided by 98%) by the general
partners 2% general partner interest. |
|
(2) |
Determined by dividing the total number of our units (19,638,072
common units, 14,734,572 subordinated units and the 2% general
partner interest, which has a dilutive effect equivalent to
701,483 units) to be outstanding after this offering into
our pro forma net tangible book value, after giving effect to
the application of the estimated net proceeds of this offering. |
The following table sets forth the number of units that we have
issued to our general partner and its affiliates and to
investors prior to this offering and that we will issue to
purchasers of common units in this offering, and the total
consideration contributed to us by our general partner and its
affiliates, prior investors in our initial public offering and
by the purchasers of common units in this offering upon
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units Owned | |
|
Total Consideration | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
General partner and its affiliates(1)(2)
|
|
|
24,170,627 |
|
|
|
68.9 |
% |
|
$ |
530,984,959 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
% |
Prior investors
|
|
|
6,903,500 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
151,800,000 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
New investors
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
120,440,000 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
35,074,127 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
803,224,959 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Upon the consummation of this offering, our general partner and
its affiliates will own an aggregate of 8,734,572 common units
and 14,734,572 subordinated units and the 2% general partner
interest, which has a dilutive effect equivalent to
701,483 units. |
|
|
(2) |
The assets contributed by our general partner and its affiliates
in connection with our formation and initial public offering
were recorded at book value in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. Book value
of the consideration provided by our general partner and its
affiliates, as of May 9, 2005, was $528.5 million. Our
general partner will contribute an additional $2.5 million
in connection with this offering. |
|
45
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON UNITS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
As of November 1, 2005, there were 15,638,072 common units
outstanding, held by approximately 17 holders of record.
Our common units were first offered on the New York Stock
Exchange on May 5, 2005 at an initial offering price of
$22.00 per unit. Our common units are traded on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol TGP.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
high and low sales prices for our common units, as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange, and quarterly cash distributions
declared per common unit. The last reported sale price of common
units on the New York Stock Exchange on November 11, 2005
was $30.11 per common unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range | |
|
Cash | |
|
|
| |
|
Distributions | |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
per Unit(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended December 31 (through November 11)
|
|
$ |
32.25 |
|
|
$ |
27.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30
|
|
|
34.70 |
|
|
|
28.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.4125 |
|
Quarter Ended
June 30(2)
|
|
|
28.45 |
|
|
|
24.30 |
|
|
|
0.2357 |
(3) |
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month Ended November 30 (through November 11)
|
|
$ |
30.60 |
|
|
$ |
28.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Month Ended October 31
|
|
|
32.25 |
|
|
|
27.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Month Ended September 30
|
|
|
32.70 |
|
|
|
30.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Month Ended August 31
|
|
|
34.70 |
|
|
|
29.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Month Ended July 31
|
|
|
32.92 |
|
|
|
28.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Month Ended June 30
|
|
|
28.45 |
|
|
|
25.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents cash distributions attributable to the quarter and
paid within 45 days after the quarter. |
|
|
(2) |
Period beginning May 5, 2005. |
|
|
|
(3) |
The distribution reflects the 52-day period from May 10,
2005 to June 30, 2005. |
|
46
CASH DISTRIBUTION POLICY
General
Rationale for Our Cash Distribution Policy. Our
partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our
available cash quarterly. This cash distribution policy reflects
a basic judgment that our unitholders will be better served by
our distributing our cash available after expenses and reserves
rather than retaining it. Because we believe we will generally
finance any capital investments from external financing sources,
we believe that our investors are best served by our
distributing all of our available cash. Because we are not
subject to an entity-level federal income tax, we have more cash
to distribute to you than would be the case were we subject to
tax.
Limitations on Cash Distributions and Our Ability to Change
Our Cash Distribution Policy. There is no guarantee that
unitholders will receive quarterly distributions from us. Our
distribution policy is subject to certain restrictions and may
be changed at any time, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Our distribution policy is subject to restrictions on
distributions under our credit agreement. Specifically, our
credit agreement contains material financial tests and covenants
that we must satisfy. These financial tests and covenants are
described in this prospectus under the caption
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Covenants and Other Restrictions
in Our Financing Agreements. Should we be unable to
satisfy these restrictions under our credit agreement, we would
be prohibited from making cash distributions to you
notwithstanding our stated cash distribution policy. |
|
|
|
The board of directors of our general partner will have the
authority to establish reserves for the prudent conduct of our
business and for future cash distributions to our unitholders,
and the establishment of those reserves could result in a
reduction in cash distributions to you from levels we currently
anticipate pursuant to our stated distribution policy. |
|
|
|
Even if our cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked,
the amount of distributions we pay under our cash distribution
policy and the decision to make any distribution is determined
by our general partner, taking into consideration the terms of
our partnership agreement. |
|
|
|
Under Section 51 of the Marshall Islands Limited
Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to you if the
distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair
value of our assets. |
|
|
|
We may lack sufficient cash to pay distributions to our
unitholders due to increases in our general and administrative
expense, principal and interest payments on our outstanding
debt, tax expenses, working capital requirements and anticipated
cash needs. |
|
|
|
While our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of
our available cash, our partnership agreement, including
provisions requiring us to make cash distributions contained
therein, may be amended. Although during the subordination
period, with certain exceptions, our partnership agreement may
not be amended without the approval of the public common
unitholders, our partnership agreement can be amended with the
approval of a majority of the outstanding common units, voting
as a class (including common units held by affiliates of our
general partner) after the subordination period has ended. |
Our Ability to Grow Depends on Our Ability to Access External
Expansion Capital. We expect that we will distribute all of
our available cash to our unitholders. As a result, our growth
may not be as fast as businesses that reinvest their available
cash to expand ongoing operations and we expect that we will
rely primarily upon external financing sources, including
commercial bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity
securities, to fund our acquisitions and expansion capital
expenditures. To the extent we are unable to finance growth
externally, our cash distribution policy will significantly
impair our ability to grow. In addition, to the extent we issue
additional units in connection with any acquisitions or
expansion capital expenditures, the payment of distributions on
those additional units may increase the risk that we will be
unable to maintain or increase our per unit distribution level,
which in turn may reduce the
47
available cash that we have to distribute on each unit. The
incurrence of additional debt to finance our growth strategy
would result in increased interest expense, which in turn may
reduce the available cash that we have to distribute to our
unitholders.
Distributions of Available Cash
Within approximately 45 days after the end of each quarter,
we distribute all of our available cash to unitholders of record
on the applicable record date.
|
|
|
Definition of Available Cash |
We define available cash in the glossary, and it generally
means, for each fiscal quarter, all cash on hand at the end of
the quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves established by our general
partner to: |
|
|
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of our business (including
reserves for future capital expenditures and for our anticipated
credit needs); |
|
|
|
comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments, or
other agreements; or |
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our
general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters; |
|
|
|
|
|
plus all cash on hand on the date of determination of available
cash for the quarter resulting from working capital borrowings
made after the end of the quarter. Working capital borrowings
are generally borrowings that are made under our credit
agreement and in all cases are used solely for working capital
purposes or to pay distributions to partners. |
|
|
|
Minimum Quarterly Distribution |
Common unitholders are entitled under our partnership agreement
to receive a quarterly distribution of $0.4125 per unit, or
$1.65 per year, prior to any distribution on the
subordinated units to the extent we have sufficient cash from
our operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment
of fees and expenses, including payments to our general partner.
Our general partner has the authority to determine the amount of
our available cash for any quarter. This determination, as well
as all determinations made by the general partner, must be made
in good faith. There is no guarantee that we will pay the
minimum quarterly distribution on the common units in any
quarter, and we will be prohibited from making any distributions
to unitholders if it would cause an event of default, or an
event of default is existing, under our credit agreement. For a
discussion of the restrictions in our credit agreement that may
restrict our ability to make distributions, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Covenants and Other Restrictions
in Our Financing Agreements.
Operating Surplus and Capital Surplus
All cash distributed to unitholders is characterized as either
operating surplus or capital surplus. We
treat distributions of available cash from operating surplus
differently than distributions of available cash from capital
surplus.
48
|
|
|
Definition of Operating Surplus |
We define operating surplus in the glossary, and for any period
it generally means:
|
|
|
|
|
our cash balance on the closing date of our initial public
offering, other than cash reserved to terminate interest rate
swap agreements; plus |
|
|
|
$10 million (as described below); plus |
|
|
|
all of our cash receipts after the closing of our initial public
offering, excluding cash from (1) borrowings, other than
working capital borrowings, (2) sales of equity and debt
securities, (3) sales or other dispositions of assets
outside the ordinary course of business, (4) termination of
interest rate swap agreements, (5) capital contributions or
(6) corporate reorganizations or restructurings; plus |
|
|
|
working capital borrowings made after the end of a quarter but
before the date of determination of operating surplus for the
quarter; plus |
|
|
|
interest paid on debt incurred (including periodic net payments
under related interest rate swap agreements) and cash
distributions paid on equity securities issued, in each case, to
finance all or any portion of the construction, replacement or
improvement of a capital asset such as vessels during the period
from such financing until the earlier to occur of the date the
capital asset is put into service or the date that it is
abandoned or disposed of; plus |
|
|
|
interest paid on debt incurred (including periodic net payments
under related interest rate swap agreements) and cash
distributions paid on equity securities issued, in each case, to
pay the construction period interest on debt incurred, or to pay
construction period distributions on equity issued, to finance
the construction projects described in the immediately preceding
bullet; less |
|
|
|
all of our cash operating expenditures after the closing of our
initial public offering and the repayment of working capital
borrowings, but not (1) the repayment of other borrowings,
(2) actual maintenance capital expenditures or expansion
capital expenditures, (3) transaction expenses (including
taxes) related to interim capital transactions or
(4) distributions; less |
|
|
|
estimated maintenance capital expenditures and the amount of
cash reserves established by our general partner to provide
funds for future operating expenditures. |
As described above, operating surplus does not only reflect
actual cash on hand that is available for distribution to our
unitholders. For example, it also includes a provision that
enables us, if we choose, to distribute as operating surplus up
to $10 million of cash we may receive from non-operating
sources, such as asset sales, issuances of securities and
long-term borrowings, that would otherwise be distributed as
capital surplus. In addition, the effect of including, as
described above, certain cash distributions on equity securities
or interest payments on debt in operating surplus is to increase
operating surplus by the amount of any such cash distributions
or interest payments. As a result, we may also distribute as
operating surplus up to the amount of any such cash
distributions or interest payments of cash we receive from
non-operating sources.
For purposes of determining operating surplus, maintenance
capital expenditures are those capital expenditures required to
maintain over the long term the operating capacity of or the
revenue generated by our capital assets, and expansion capital
expenditures are those capital expenditures that increase the
operating capacity of or the revenue generated by our capital
assets. To the extent, however, that capital expenditures
associated with acquiring a new vessel increase the revenues or
the operating capacity of our fleet, those capital expenditures
are classified as expansion capital expenditures.
Examples of maintenance capital expenditures include capital
expenditures associated with drydocking a vessel or acquiring a
new vessel to the extent such expenditures are incurred to
maintain the operating capacity of or the revenue generated by
our fleet. Maintenance capital expenditures also include interest
49
(and related fees) on debt incurred and distributions on equity
issued to finance the construction of a replacement vessel and
paid during the construction period, which we define as the
period beginning on the date that we enter into a binding
construction contract and ending on the earlier of the date that
the replacement vessel commences commercial service or the date
that the replacement vessel is abandoned or disposed of. Debt
incurred to pay or equity issued to fund construction period
interest payments, and distributions on such equity, also are
considered maintenance capital expenditures.
Because our maintenance capital expenditures can be very large
and vary significantly in timing, the amount of our actual
maintenance capital expenditures may differ substantially from
period to period, which could cause similar fluctuations in the
amounts of operating surplus, adjusted operating surplus, and
available cash for distribution to our unitholders if we
subtracted actual maintenance capital expenditures from
operating surplus each quarter. Accordingly, to eliminate the
effect on operating surplus of these fluctuations, our
partnership agreement requires that an amount equal to an
estimate of the average quarterly maintenance capital
expenditures necessary to maintain the operating capacity of or
the revenue generated by our capital assets over the long term
be subtracted from operating surplus each quarter, as opposed to
the actual amounts spent. The amount of estimated maintenance
capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject
to review and change by the board of directors of our general
partner at least once a year, provided that any change must be
approved by our conflicts committee. The estimate is made at
least annually and whenever an event occurs that is likely to
result in a material adjustment to the amount of our maintenance
capital expenditures, such as a major acquisition or the
introduction of new governmental regulations that affects our
fleet. For purposes of calculating operating surplus, any
adjustment to this estimate is prospective only.
The use of estimated maintenance capital expenditures in
calculating operating surplus has the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
it reduces the risk that actual maintenance capital expenditures
in any one quarter will be large enough to make operating
surplus less than the minimum quarterly distribution to be paid
on all the units for that quarter and subsequent quarters; |
|
|
|
it reduces the need for us to borrow under our working capital
facility to pay distributions; |
|
|
|
it is more difficult for us to raise our distribution above the
minimum quarterly distribution and pay incentive distributions
to our general partner; and |
|
|
|
it reduces the likelihood that a large maintenance capital
expenditure in a period will prevent the general partners
affiliates from being able to convert some or all of their
subordinated units into common units since the effect of an
estimate is to spread the expected expense over several periods,
mitigating the effect of the actual payment of the expenditure
on any single period. |
|
|
|
Definition of Capital Surplus |
We also define capital surplus in the glossary, and it generally
is generated only by:
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings other than working capital borrowings; |
|
|
|
sales of debt and equity securities; and |
|
|
|
sales or other dispositions of assets for cash, other than
inventory, accounts receivable and other current assets sold in
the ordinary course of business or non-current assets sold as
part of normal retirements or replacements of assets. |
|
|
|
Characterization of Cash Distributions |
We treat all available cash distributed as coming from operating
surplus until the sum of all available cash distributed since we
began operations equals the operating surplus as of the most
recent date of determination of available cash. We treat any
amount distributed in excess of operating surplus, regardless of
its source, as capital surplus. We do not anticipate that we
will make any distributions from capital surplus.
50
Subordination Period
During the subordination period, which we define below and in
the glossary, the common units will have the right to receive
distributions of available cash from operating surplus in an
amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution of
$0.4125 per quarter, plus any arrearages in the payment of
the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units from
prior quarters, before any distributions of available cash from
operating surplus may be made on the subordinated units. The
purpose of the subordinated units is to increase the likelihood
that during the subordination period there will be available
cash to be distributed on the common units.
|
|
|
Definition of Subordination Period |
We define the subordination period in the glossary. The
subordination period extends until the first day of any quarter,
beginning after March 31, 2010, that each of the following
tests are met:
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each
of the outstanding common units and subordinated units equaled
or exceeded the minimum quarterly distribution for each of the
three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
immediately preceding that date; |
|
|
|
the adjusted operating surplus (as defined below)
generated during each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping
four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date equaled or
exceeded the sum of the minimum quarterly distributions on all
of the outstanding common units and subordinated units during
those periods on a fully diluted basis and the related
distribution on the 2% general partner interest during those
periods; and |
|
|
|
there are no arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units. |
If the unitholders remove our general partner without cause, the
subordination period may end before March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Early Conversion of Subordinated Units |
Before the end of the subordination period, 50% of the
subordinated units, or up to 7,367,286 subordinated units, may
convert into common units on a one-for-one basis immediately
after the distribution of available cash to the partners in
respect of any quarter ending on or after:
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 with respect to 25% of the subordinated
units outstanding immediately after our initial public
offering; and |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 with respect to a further 25% of the
subordinated units outstanding immediately after our initial
public offering. |
The early conversions will occur if at the end of the applicable
quarter each of the following occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each
of the outstanding common units and subordinated units equaled
or exceeded the minimum quarterly distribution for each of the
three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
immediately preceding that date; |
|
|
|
the adjusted operating surplus generated during each of the
three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
immediately preceding that date equaled or exceeded the sum of
the minimum quarterly distributions on all of the outstanding
common units and subordinated units during those periods on a
fully diluted basis and the related distribution on the 2%
general partner interest during those periods; and |
|
|
|
there are no arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units. |
However, the second early conversion of the subordinated units
may not occur until at least one year following the first early
conversion of the subordinated units.
51
For purposes of determining whether sufficient adjusted
operating surplus has been generated under these conversion
tests, the conflicts committee may adjust adjusted operating
surplus upwards or downwards if it determines in good faith that
the estimated amount of maintenance capital expenditures used in
the determination of operating surplus was materially incorrect,
based on circumstances prevailing at the time of original
determination of the estimate.
|
|
|
Definition of Adjusted Operating Surplus |
We define adjusted operating surplus in the glossary, and for
any period it generally means:
|
|
|
|
|
operating surplus generated with respect to that period; less |
|
|
|
any net increase in working capital borrowings with respect to
that period; less |
|
|
|
any net reduction in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period not relating to an operating
expenditure made with respect to that period; plus |
|
|
|
any net decrease in working capital borrowings with respect to
that period; plus |
|
|
|
any net increase in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period required by any debt instrument for
the repayment of principal, interest or premium. |
Adjusted operating surplus is intended to reflect the cash
generated from operations during a particular period and
therefore excludes net increases in working capital borrowings
and net drawdowns of reserves of cash generated in prior periods.
|
|
|
Effect of Expiration of the Subordination Period |
Upon expiration of the subordination period, each outstanding
subordinated unit will convert into one common unit and will
then participate pro rata with the other common units in
distributions of available cash. In addition, if the unitholders
remove our general partner other than for cause and units held
by our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor
of such removal:
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and each subordinated unit
will immediately convert into one common unit; |
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and |
|
|
|
our general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner interest and, if any, its incentive distribution rights
into common units or to receive cash in exchange for those
interests. |
Distributions of Available Cash From Operating Surplus During
the Subordination Period
We make distributions of available cash from operating surplus
for any quarter during the subordination period in the following
manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our
general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common
unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for
that quarter; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our
general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common
unit an amount equal to any arrearages in payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution on the common units for any prior
quarters during the subordination period; |
|
|
|
third, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
our general partner, until we distribute for each subordinated
unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for
that quarter; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, in the manner described in
Incentive Distribution Rights below. |
52
Distributions of Available Cash From Operating Surplus After
the Subordination Period
We will make distributions of available cash from operating
surplus for any quarter after the subordination period in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general
partner, until we distribute for each outstanding unit an amount
equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that
quarter; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, in the manner described in
Incentive Distribution Rights below. |
Incentive Distribution Rights
Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an
increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available
cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels have been
achieved. Our general partner currently holds the incentive
distribution rights, but may transfer these rights separately
from its general partner interest, subject to restrictions in
the partnership agreement.
If for any quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus to the
common and subordinated unitholders in an amount equal to the
minimum quarterly distribution; and |
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus on
outstanding common units in an amount necessary to eliminate any
cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution; |
then, we will distribute any additional available cash from
operating surplus for that quarter among the unitholders and our
general partner in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general
partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.4625 per unit for that quarter (the first target
distribution); |
|
|
|
second, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to our general
partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.5375 per unit for that quarter (the second target
distribution); |
|
|
|
third, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to our general
partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.6500 per unit for that quarter (the third target
distribution); and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to our
general partner. |
In each case, the amount of the target distribution set forth
above is exclusive of any distributions to common unitholders to
eliminate any cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution. The percentage interests set forth above
for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest
and assume the general partner has not transferred the incentive
distribution rights.
Percentage Allocations of Available Cash From Operating
Surplus
The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of
the additional available cash from operating surplus among the
unitholders and our general partner up to the various target
distribution levels. The amounts set forth under Marginal
Percentage Interest in Distributions are the percentage
interests of the unitholders and our general partner in any
available cash from operating surplus we distribute up to and
including the corresponding amount in the column Total
Quarterly Distribution Target Amount, until available cash
from operating surplus we distribute reaches the next target
distribution level, if any. The percentage interests shown for
the unitholders and our general partner for the minimum
quarterly distribution are also applicable to quarterly
distribution amounts that are less than the minimum quarterly
53
distribution. The percentage interests shown for our general
partner include its 2% general partner interest and assume the
general partner has not transferred the incentive distribution
rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal Percentage Interest | |
|
|
|
|
in Distributions | |
|
|
Total Quarterly |
|
| |
|
|
Distribution Target Amount |
|
Unitholders | |
|
General Partner | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
|
|
$0.4125 |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
First Target Distribution
|
|
up to $0.4625 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Second Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.4625 up to $0.5375 |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Third Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.5375 up to $0.6500 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
above $0.6500 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Distributions From Capital Surplus
|
|
|
How Distributions From Capital Surplus Will Be Made |
We will make distributions of available cash from capital
surplus, if any, in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general
partner, until we distribute for each common unit that was
issued in this offering, an amount of available cash from
capital surplus equal to the initial public offering price; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our
general partner, until we distribute for each common unit, an
amount of available cash from capital surplus equal to any
unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, we will make all distributions of available cash
from capital surplus as if they were from operating surplus. |
|
|
|
Effect of a Distribution From Capital Surplus |
The partnership agreement treats a distribution of capital
surplus as the repayment of the $22.00 initial unit price from
our initial public offering on May 10, 2005, which is a
return of capital. That initial public offering price less any
distributions of capital surplus per unit is referred to as the
unrecovered initial unit price. Each time a
distribution of capital surplus is made, the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels will be reduced
in the same proportion as the corresponding reduction in the
unrecovered initial unit price. Because distributions of capital
surplus will reduce the minimum quarterly distribution, after
any of these distributions are made, it may be easier for our
general partner to receive incentive distributions and for the
subordinated units to convert into common units. However, any
distribution of capital surplus before the unrecovered initial
unit price is reduced to zero cannot be applied to the payment
of the minimum quarterly distribution or any arrearages.
Once we distribute capital surplus on a unit issued in our
initial public offering in an amount equal to the initial public
offering price for our initial public offering, we will reduce
the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution
levels to zero. We will then make all future distributions from
operating surplus, with 50% being paid to the holders of units
and 50% to our general partner. The percentage interests shown
for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest
and assume the general partner has not transferred the incentive
distribution rights.
Adjustment to the Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target
Distribution Levels
In addition to adjusting the minimum quarterly distribution and
target distribution levels to reflect a distribution of capital
surplus, if we combine our units into fewer units or subdivide
our units into a greater number of units, we will
proportionately adjust:
|
|
|
|
|
the minimum quarterly distribution; |
|
|
|
the target distribution levels; |
54
|
|
|
|
|
the unrecovered initial unit price; and |
|
|
|
the number of common units issuable during the subordination
period without a unitholder vote. |
For example, if a two-for-one split of the common units should
occur, the minimum quarterly distribution, the target
distribution levels and the unrecovered initial unit price would
each be reduced to 50% of its initial level and the number of
common units issuable during the subordination period without a
unitholder vote would double. We will not make any adjustment by
reason of the issuance of additional units for cash or property.
In addition, if legislation is enacted or if existing law is
modified or interpreted by a governmental taxing authority so
that we become taxable as a corporation or otherwise subject to
taxation as an entity for U.S. federal, state, local or
non-U.S. income tax purposes, we will reduce the minimum
quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels for
each quarter by multiplying each distribution level by a
fraction, the numerator of which is available cash for that
quarter and the denominator of which is the sum of available
cash for that quarter plus the general partners estimate
of our aggregate liability for the quarter for such income taxes
payable by reason of such legislation or interpretation. To the
extent that the actual tax liability differs from the estimated
tax liability for any quarter, the difference will be accounted
for in subsequent quarters.
Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation
If we dissolve in accordance with the partnership agreement, we
will sell or otherwise dispose of our assets in a process called
liquidation. We will first apply the proceeds of liquidation to
the payment of our creditors. We will distribute any remaining
proceeds to the unitholders and our general partner, in
accordance with their capital account balances, as adjusted to
reflect any gain or loss upon the sale or other disposition of
our assets in liquidation.
The allocations of gain and loss upon liquidation are intended,
to the extent possible, to entitle the holders of outstanding
common units to a preference over the holders of outstanding
subordinated units upon our liquidation, to the extent required
to permit common unitholders to receive their unrecovered
initial unit price plus the minimum quarterly distribution for
the quarter during which liquidation occurs plus any unpaid
arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on
the common units. However, there may not be sufficient gain upon
our liquidation to enable the holders of common units to fully
recover all of these amounts, even though there may be cash
available for distribution to the holders of subordinated units.
Any further net gain recognized upon liquidation will be
allocated in a manner that takes into account the incentive
distribution rights of our general partner.
|
|
|
Manner of Adjustments for Gain |
The manner of the adjustment for gain is set forth in the
partnership agreement. If our liquidation occurs before the end
of the subordination period, we will allocate any gain to the
partners in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, to our general partner and the holders of units who have
negative balances in their capital accounts to the extent of and
in proportion to those negative balances; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our
general partner, until the capital account for each common unit
is equal to the sum of: |
|
|
|
(1) the unrecovered initial unit price; |
|
|
(2) the amount of the minimum quarterly distribution for
the quarter during which our liquidation occurs; and |
|
|
(3) any unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution; |
55
|
|
|
|
|
third, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
our general partner until the capital account for each
subordinated unit is equal to the sum of: |
|
|
|
(1) the unrecovered initial unit price; and |
|
|
(2) the amount of the minimum quarterly distribution for
the quarter during which our liquidation occurs; |
|
|
|
|
|
fourth, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general
partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an amount per
unit equal to: |
|
|
|
(1) the sum of the excess of the first target distribution
per unit over the minimum quarterly distribution per unit for
each quarter of our existence; less |
|
|
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the minimum
quarterly distribution per unit that we distributed 98% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, for each
quarter of our existence; |
|
|
|
|
|
fifth, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to our general
partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an amount per
unit equal to: |
|
|
|
(1) the sum of the excess of the second target distribution
per unit over the first target distribution per unit for each
quarter of our existence; less |
|
|
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the first
target distribution per unit that we distributed 85% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to our general partner for each
quarter of our existence; |
|
|
|
|
|
sixth, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to our general
partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an amount per
unit equal to: |
|
|
|
(1) the sum of the excess of the third target distribution
per unit over the second target distribution per unit for each
quarter of our existence; less |
|
|
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the second
target distribution per unit that we distributed 75% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to our general partner for each
quarter of our existence; and |
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to our
general partner. |
The percentage interests set forth above for our general partner
include its 2% general partner interest and assume the general
partner has not transferred the incentive distribution rights.
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that clause (3) of the second
bullet point above and all of the third bullet point above will
no longer be applicable.
|
|
|
Manner of Adjustments for Losses |
If our liquidation occurs before the end of the subordination
period, we will generally allocate any loss to our general
partner and the unitholders in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to holders of subordinated units in proportion to the
positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to our
general partner, until the capital accounts of the subordinated
unitholders have been reduced to zero; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the holders of common units in proportion to the
positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to our
general partner, until the capital accounts of the common
unitholders have been reduced to zero; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 100% to our general partner. |
56
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that the first bullet point above will
no longer be applicable.
|
|
|
Adjustments to Capital Accounts |
We will make adjustments to capital accounts upon the issuance
of additional units. In doing so, we will allocate any
unrealized and, for tax purposes, unrecognized gain or loss
resulting from the adjustments to the existing unitholders and
our general partner in the same manner as we allocate gain or
loss upon liquidation. In the event that we make positive
adjustments to the capital accounts upon the issuance of
additional units, we will allocate any later negative
adjustments to the capital accounts resulting from the issuance
of additional units or upon our liquidation in a manner which
results, to the extent possible, in our general partners
and unitholders capital account balances equaling the
amount which they would have been if no earlier positive
adjustments to the capital accounts had been made.
57
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL AND OPERATING
DATA
The following table presents, in each case for the periods and
as of the dates indicated, selected:
|
|
|
|
|
historical financial and operating data of Teekay Shipping Spain
S.L. (or Teekay Spain), which was named Naviera F. Tapias
S.A. (or Tapias) prior to its acquisition by Teekay
Shipping Corporation through its subsidiary, Teekay Luxembourg
S.a.r.l. (or Luxco), on April 30, 2004; |
|
|
|
historical financial and operating data of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. since its initial public offering on May 10, 2005, in
connection with which it acquired Luxco from Teekay Shipping
Corporation; and |
|
|
|
pro forma financial and operating data of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. |
The selected historical financial and operating data has been
prepared on the following basis:
|
|
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain
excludes financial information related to three businesses
previously held in separate subsidiaries and unrelated to the
marine transportation of LNG and crude oil, which were disposed
of prior to Teekay Shipping Corporations acquisition of
Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 and
the four months ended April 30, 2004 are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of Teekay Spain
included elsewhere in this prospectus; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at and for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 are
derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of
Teekay Spain, which are not included in this prospectus; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at December 31, 2004 and for the eight months ended
December 31, 2004 reflect the acquisition of Teekay Spain
by Teekay Shipping Corporation and are derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements of Teekay Spain included
elsewhere in this prospectus; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain, for
the four months ended April 30, 2004, the two months ended
June 30, 2004 and the period from January 1, 2005 to
May 9, 2005 reflect the acquisition of Teekay Spain by
Teekay Shipping Corporation and are derived from the unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. included elsewhere in this prospectus; and |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay LNG
Partners L.P. as at June 30, 2005 and for the period from
May 10, 2005 to June 30, 2005 reflect its initial
public offering and related acquisition of Luxco and are derived
from the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
The unaudited pro forma financial and operating data of Teekay
LNG Partners L.P. give pro forma effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
the contribution by Teekay Shipping Corporation to us of the
capital stock and notes receivable of Luxco; |
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporations loans and contributions to
us, prior to our initial public offering, which we used,
together with existing cash, to repay indebtedness and settle
interest rate swaps; and |
|
|
|
the completion of our initial public offering and the use of the
net proceeds of that offering. |
The pro forma financial data presented for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the six months ended June 30,
2005 are derived from our unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements. The pro forma income statement data for
the year ended December 31, 2004 and the six months ended
June 30,
58
2005 assumes our initial public offering and related
transactions occurred on January 1, 2004. A more complete
explanation of the pro forma data can be found in our unaudited
pro forma consolidated financial statements included with this
prospectus.
The following table presents two financial measures, net voyage
revenues and EBITDA, which we use in our business. These
financial measures are not calculated or presented in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (or
GAAP). We explain these measures below and reconcile them
to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated
and presented in accordance with GAAP in Appendix B to this
prospectus.
Because drydocking expenditures are more extensive in nature
than normal routine maintenance, we capitalize and amortize them
for a given vessel from the completion of a drydocking to the
estimated completion of the next drydocking. For more
information about our accounting treatment of drydocking
expenditures, please read Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Overview Important Financial
and Operational Terms and Concepts Drydocking
and Depreciation and Amortization.
To make the selected historical financial and operating data
more comparable, our historical operating results do not include
the historical results of Luxco for the two months ended
June 30, 2004, the nine months ended December 31, 2004
or the period from January 1, 2005 to May 9, 2005 (the
2005 Pre-IPO Period). During these periods, Luxco had no
revenues, expenses or income, or assets or liabilities, other
than:
|
|
|
|
|
advances (including accrued interest) of $465.7 million and
$312.3 million as of December 31, 2004 and
June 30, 2004, respectively, from Teekay Shipping
Corporation that Luxco used to purchase Teekay Spain and to
prepay certain debt of Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
net interest expense related to the advances of
$9.8 million, $2.4 million and $7.3 million for
the nine months ended December 31, 2004, the two months
ended June 30, 2004 and for the 2005 Pre-IPO Period,
respectively; |
|
|
|
unrealized foreign exchange losses of $44.7 million and
$3.8 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2004 and the two months ended June 30, 2004, respectively,
related to the advances, which are Euro- denominated, and a
$23.8 million unrealized foreign exchange gain related to
the advances for the 2005 Pre-IPO Period; |
|
|
|
other expenses of $1.1 million, $0.1 million and
$0.1 million for those respective periods; |
|
|
|
cash and cash equivalents of $2.2 million and
$10.0 million as of December 31, 2004 and
June 30, 2004, respectively; and |
|
|
|
its ownership interest in Teekay Spain and certain purchase
rights and obligations for Suezmax tankers operated by Teekay
Spain under capital lease arrangements, which it acquired from
Teekay Spain on December 30, 2004. |
We believe the exclusion of the Luxco results makes our results
more comparable because Luxcos results and financial
position relate solely to the financing of the acquisition of
Teekay Spain and repayment of Teekay Spain debt by Teekay
Shipping Corporation and do not relate to the historical results
of Teekay Spain. In addition, because the capital stock of Luxco
and the advances from Teekay Shipping Corporation were
contributed to us in connection with our initial public
offering, these advances and their related effects were
eliminated on consolidation, as reflected in our selected pro
forma financial data. For more information on Luxco, please read
the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Luxco
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
59
The following tables should be read together with, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the historical and
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
tables also should be read together with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. Footnotes for both of these tables follow the
second table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except per unit and fleet data) | |
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
52,217 |
|
|
$ |
60,326 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses(1)
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
Vessel operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
10,883 |
|
|
|
12,403 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,803 |
|
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,967 |
|
|
|
5,061 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
33,957 |
|
|
|
38,650 |
|
|
|
45,628 |
|
|
|
63,540 |
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
53,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
14,238 |
|
|
|
23,169 |
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
29,135 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(15,625 |
) |
|
|
(20,104 |
) |
|
|
(18,109 |
) |
|
|
(34,862 |
) |
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
(40,560 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
8,431 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
13,426 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)(3)
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
3,462 |
|
|
|
(44,310 |
) |
|
|
(71,502 |
) |
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
(34,149 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,618 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss)(5)
|
|
|
3,615 |
|
|
|
5,327 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before change in accounting principle
|
|
|
7,349 |
|
|
|
6,495 |
|
|
|
(113,770 |
) |
|
|
(59,432 |
) |
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
(28,787 |
) |
Change in accounting principle(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
7,349 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per unit (basic and diluted)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
(at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities
|
|
$ |
24,185 |
|
|
$ |
24,625 |
|
|
$ |
20,141 |
|
|
$ |
22,533 |
|
|
$ |
11,289 |
|
|
$ |
154,203 |
|
Restricted cash deposits(8)
|
|
|
29,243 |
|
|
|
70,051 |
|
|
|
106,399 |
|
|
|
398,038 |
|
|
|
385,564 |
|
|
|
435,112 |
|
Vessels and equipment(9)
|
|
|
277,076 |
|
|
|
368,951 |
|
|
|
705,010 |
|
|
|
602,550 |
|
|
|
602,055 |
|
|
|
813,431 |
|
Total assets(8)
|
|
|
357,247 |
|
|
|
491,058 |
|
|
|
882,604 |
|
|
|
1,069,081 |
|
|
|
1,021,695 |
|
|
|
1,651,522 |
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations(8)(10)
|
|
|
317,710 |
|
|
|
444,865 |
|
|
|
882,027 |
|
|
|
1,129,426 |
|
|
|
1,072,379 |
|
|
|
1,200,499 |
|
Total stockholders/partners equity (deficit)
|
|
|
34,673 |
|
|
|
29,849 |
|
|
|
(106,105 |
) |
|
|
(164,809 |
) |
|
|
(144,186 |
) |
|
|
184,650 |
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
19,695 |
|
|
$ |
24,770 |
|
|
$ |
20,418 |
|
|
$ |
18,318 |
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
7,381 |
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
31,852 |
|
|
|
176,316 |
|
|
|
(277,616 |
) |
|
|
(25,846 |
) |
|
|
95,645 |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(23,304 |
) |
|
|
(55,695 |
) |
|
|
(199,218 |
) |
|
|
262,766 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
39,986 |
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
47,913 |
|
|
$ |
55,234 |
|
|
$ |
54,532 |
|
|
$ |
81,798 |
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
|
$ |
80,025 |
|
EBITDA(11)
|
|
|
36,556 |
|
|
|
33,912 |
|
|
|
(81,056 |
) |
|
|
(6,578 |
) |
|
|
36,887 |
|
|
|
24,571 |
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
173,186 |
|
|
|
110,097 |
|
|
|
186,755 |
|
|
|
133,628 |
|
|
|
5,522 |
|
|
|
83,703 |
|
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
4,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
LNG Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Suezmax Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Six | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
May 1, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
May 10, | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except per unit and fleet data) | |
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
17,453 |
|
|
$ |
50,129 |
|
|
$ |
20,364 |
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
|
$ |
70,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses(1)
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
Vessel operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
10,771 |
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
30,617 |
|
|
|
14,703 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
6,426 |
|
|
|
14,751 |
|
|
|
5,852 |
|
|
|
37,808 |
|
|
|
20,603 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
8,813 |
|
|
|
5,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
13,280 |
|
|
|
28,689 |
|
|
|
11,131 |
|
|
|
82,170 |
|
|
|
40,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
4,173 |
|
|
|
21,440 |
|
|
|
9,233 |
|
|
|
41,663 |
|
|
|
29,836 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
(8,632 |
) |
|
|
(28,356 |
) |
|
|
(8,196 |
) |
|
|
(31,060 |
) |
|
|
(26,778 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
3,473 |
|
|
|
9,098 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
22,211 |
|
|
|
12,101 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)(3)
|
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
(6,189 |
) |
|
|
23,835 |
|
|
|
22,993 |
|
|
|
(16,139 |
) |
|
|
46,828 |
|
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)(4)
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss)(5)
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
(17,927 |
) |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
(17,269 |
) |
|
|
(1,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before change in accounting principle
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
(6,571 |
) |
|
|
8,090 |
|
|
|
28,703 |
|
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
|
|
60,123 |
|
Change in accounting principle(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(6,571 |
) |
|
$ |
8,090 |
|
|
$ |
28,703 |
|
|
$ |
(1,499 |
) |
|
$ |
60,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) per unit (basic and diluted)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities
|
|
$ |
11,289 |
|
|
$ |
15,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash deposits(8)
|
|
|
385,564 |
|
|
|
393,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment(9)
|
|
|
602,055 |
|
|
|
823,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,152,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets(8)
|
|
|
1,021,695 |
|
|
|
1,476,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,826,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations(8)(10)
|
|
|
1,072,379 |
|
|
|
1,089,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
965,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders/partners equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(144,186 |
) |
|
|
284,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
682,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
3,596 |
|
|
$ |
11,867 |
|
|
$ |
13,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(25,846 |
) |
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
(159,845 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
(4,965 |
) |
|
|
19,066 |
|
|
|
15,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
|
$ |
15,991 |
|
|
$ |
49,879 |
|
|
$ |
20,291 |
|
|
$ |
118,901 |
|
|
$ |
70,169 |
|
EBITDA(11)
|
|
|
36,887 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
|
44,747 |
|
|
|
38,076 |
|
|
|
46,141 |
|
|
|
97,268 |
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
5,522 |
|
|
|
4,965 |
|
|
|
43,962 |
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
|
|
89,225 |
|
|
|
48,921 |
|
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
LNG Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Suezmax Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
(footnotes on following page)
61
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage,
including any bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and
unloading expenses, canal tolls, agency fees and commissions. |
|
|
(2) |
Vessel operating expenses include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. |
|
|
(3) |
Substantially all of these foreign currency exchange gains and
losses were unrealized and not settled in cash. Under
U.S. accounting guidelines, all foreign
currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities, such as
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, restricted cash,
accounts payable, long-term debt and capital lease obligations,
are revalued and reported based on the prevailing exchange rate
at the end of the period. Our primary source for the foreign
currency gains and losses is our Euro-denominated term loans,
which totaled 294.8 million Euros ($372.4 million) as
at December 31, 2003, 325.8 million Euros
($443.7 million) at December 31, 2004 and
321.7 million Euros ($389.2 million) at June 30,
2005. |
|
|
(4) |
We have entered into interest rate swaps to hedge our interest
rate risk from our floating-rate debt used to purchase our LNG
carriers. These interest rate swaps were not designated as
hedges under U.S. accounting guidelines until
April 30, 2004. Consequently, the changes in the fair
values of these swaps that occurred during periods prior to
April 30, 2004 have been recorded in earnings as
interest rate swaps gain (loss) for those periods.
Had these interest rate swaps been designated as hedges prior to
2003, any subsequent changes in fair value would have been
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) to the extent the hedge was effective and until the
hedged item was recognized as income. |
|
|
(5) |
The $10.9 million other loss in the four months ended
April 30, 2004 primarily resulted from a $11.9 million
loss on the sale of non-shipping assets by Teekay Spain prior to
its April 30, 2004 acquisition by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. The $17.9 million other loss in the period
from January 1, 2005 to May 9, 2005 primarily resulted
from the write-off of capitalized loan costs and the loss on
cancellation of interest rate swaps. The $17.3 million
other loss in the pro forma year ended December 31, 2004
primarily resulted from the $11.9 million loss on sale of
non-shipping assets and from a write-down of capitalized loan
costs on a pro forma basis. |
|
|
(6) |
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (or
SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, which establishes new
standards for recording derivatives in interim and annual
financial statements. We adopted SFAS 133 on
January 1, 2001. We recognized the fair value of our
derivatives as liabilities of $4.4 million on our
consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2001. This
amount was recorded as a change in accounting principle in our
consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2001. |
|
|
(7) |
Please read Note 5 of our unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus for a
calculation of our pro forma net income (loss) per unit. |
|
|
(8) |
We operate two of our LNG carriers under Spanish tax
lease arrangements. Under these arrangements, we borrow
under term loans and deposit the proceeds into restricted cash
accounts. Concurrently, we enter into capital leases for the
vessels, which are recorded as assets on our balance sheet. The
restricted cash deposits, plus the interest earned on the
deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the
capital lease arrangements, including our obligations to
purchase the vessels at the end of the lease term. Therefore,
the payments under our capital leases are fully funded through
our restricted cash deposits, and our continuing obligation is
the repayment of the term loans. However, under GAAP we record
both the obligations under the capital leases and the term loans
as liabilities, and both the restricted cash deposits and our
vessels under capital leases as assets. This accounting
treatment has the effect of overstating our assets and
liabilities by the amount of restricted cash deposits relating
to the corresponding capital lease obligations. As at
December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2005, our total assets
and total debt each included $413.3 million and
$377.6 million, respectively, of such amount. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Ship Financing Arrangements. |
62
|
|
|
|
(9) |
Vessels and equipment consist of (a) our vessels, at cost
less accumulated depreciation, (b) vessels under capital
leases, at cost less accumulated depreciation, and
(c) advances on our newbuildings. |
|
|
(10) |
Total debt for Teekay Spain as at December 31, 2004
excludes a loan made to it in December 2004 of 82.1 million
Euros ($111.8 million) by Teekay Spains direct parent
company, Teekay Spain, S.L., a subsidiary of Luxco. In April
2005, Teekay Spain used these funds to repay debt associated
with two of its LNG carriers. |
|
(11) |
EBITDA is calculated as net income (loss) before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, as set forth in
Appendix B to this prospectus, which also includes
reconciliations of EBITDA to our most directly comparable GAAP
Financial measure. EBITDA includes our foreign currency exchange
and interest rate swap gains and losses, substantially all of
which were unrealized, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
3,462 |
|
|
$ |
(44,310 |
) |
|
$ |
(71,502 |
) |
|
$ |
18,010 |
|
|
$ |
(34,149 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,618 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,156 |
) |
|
$ |
(115,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,787 |
) |
|
$ |
21,995 |
|
|
$ |
(34,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Six | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
May 1, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
May 10, | |
|
Year | |
|
Months | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
|
|
$ |
18,010 |
|
|
$ |
(6,189 |
) |
|
$ |
23,835 |
|
|
$ |
22,993 |
|
|
$ |
(16,139 |
) |
|
$ |
46,828 |
|
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,995 |
|
|
$ |
(6,189 |
) |
|
$ |
23,835 |
|
|
$ |
22,993 |
|
|
$ |
(16,139 |
) |
|
$ |
46,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12) |
Calendar-ship-days are equal to the aggregate number of calendar
days in a period that our vessels were in our possession during
that period. |
63
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our financial
condition and results of operations in conjunction with the
consolidated audited financial statements and related notes of
Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. and the unaudited historical and pro
forma consolidated financial statements and related notes of
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Among other things, those financial statements include more
detailed information regarding the basis of presentation for the
following information. The financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (or GAAP) and are presented in
U.S. Dollars unless otherwise indicated. Any amounts
converted from Euros or another non-U.S. currency to
U.S. Dollars in this prospectus are at the rate applicable
at the relevant date, or the average rate during the applicable
period.
Overview
We are an international provider of liquefied natural gas (or
LNG) and crude oil marine transportation services. Our
growth strategy focuses on expanding our fleet of LNG carriers
under long-term, fixed-rate time charters. We intend to continue
our practice of acquiring LNG carriers as needed for approved
projects only after the long-term charters for the projects have
been awarded to us, rather than ordering vessels on a
speculative basis. We view our Suezmax tanker fleet primarily as
a source of stable cash flow as we expand our LNG operations.
We manage our business and analyze and report our results of
operations on the basis of the following two business segments:
LNG Carrier Segment. We have four LNG carriers,
including one vessel delivered in July 2004 and one vessel
delivered in December 2004, all of which operate under
long-term, fixed-rate time charters.
In 2003 and 2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005,
our LNG carrier segment generated 39.7%, 49.7% and 69.8%,
respectively, of our total net voyage revenues.
In addition, we have contracted to acquire from Teekay Shipping
Corporation its 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat Corporation (or
Teekay Nakilat), which owns three LNG newbuilding
carriers. The estimated purchase price for the 70% interest in
Teekay Nakilat is $92.8 million, plus the assumption of
approximately $327.7 million of long-term debt. We
anticipate that Teekay Shipping Corporation will complete U.K.
lease arrangements to finance these three vessels, which would
significantly reduce the estimated $92.8 million payment.
Please read Liquidity and Capital
Resources Ship Financing Arrangements
U.K. Lease Arrangements below. The purchase will
occur upon the delivery of the first carrier, which is scheduled
for the fourth quarter of 2006. The remaining two carriers are
scheduled for delivery in the first half of 2007. Upon their
deliveries, these vessels will commence service under existing
charters with Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II)
(or RasGas II), a joint venture between Qatar
Petroleum and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil
Corporation, established for the purpose of expanding LNG
production in Qatar.
Suezmax Tanker Segment. We have five Suezmax
tankers, including a new tanker, the Toledo Spirit, that
delivered in July 2005. In May 2005, we sold our only
single-hulled Suezmax tanker, the Granada Spirit. In 2003
and through most of 2004 we had six Suezmax tankers, while
during most of the first six months of 2005 we had four Suezmax
tankers. We describe our Suezmax tanker dispositions and
deliveries in more detail under Results of
Operations below. All of our Suezmax tankers operate under
long-term, fixed-rate time charters.
In 2003 and 2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005,
our Suezmax tanker segment generated 60.3%, 50.3% and 30.2%,
respectively, of our total net voyage revenues.
Upon the closing of this offering, we will acquire from Teekay
Shipping Corporation for $180 million three additional
double-hulled Suezmax tankers, all of which are chartered to a
subsidiary of ConocoPhillips, an integrated, international
energy company, under fixed-rate time charters with an
64
average remaining scheduled term of approximately 10 years
and options, exercisable by the customer, to extend up to an
additional six years. These time charters are subject to
termination and vessel sale and purchase rights. Please read
Business Crude Oil Time Charters
Right to Terminate Charters and Cause Sale of Vessel.
Our original fleet was established by Naviera F. Tapias S.A. (or
Tapias), a Spanish company founded in 1991. Teekay
Shipping Corporation, through its subsidiary Teekay Luxembourg
S.a.r.l. (or Luxco), acquired Tapias on April 30,
2004 and changed its name to Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. (or
Teekay Spain). Teekay Shipping Corporation acquired
Tapias for $298.2 million in cash, plus the assumption of
existing debt and newbuilding commitments. For additional
information, please read the consolidated audited financial
statements and related notes of Teekay Spain and Luxco included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
Our Initial Public Offering |
On November 3, 2004, Teekay Shipping Corporation formed us
to own and operate the LNG and Suezmax crude oil marine
transportation businesses conducted by Luxco and its
subsidiaries. On May 6, 2005, Teekay Shipping Corporation
contributed to us all of the outstanding shares of Luxco, all
but $54.9 million of notes receivable from Luxco, and all
of the outstanding equity interests of Granada Spirit L.L.C.,
which owns the Granada Spirit. We subsequently repaid the
$54.9 million note receivable. In exchange for these shares
and assets, we issued to Teekay Shipping Corporation 8,734,572
of our common units and 14,734,572 of our subordinated units.
Our general partner, Teekay GP L.L.C., also received a 2%
general partner interest and all of the incentive distribution
rights in us. Teekay GP L.L.C. is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation. On May 10, 2005, we sold
6,900,000 of our common units in our initial public offering at
a price of $22.00 per unit, for proceeds of
$151.8 million before underwriting costs and offering
expenses.
We generate revenues by charging customers for the
transportation of their LNG and crude oil using our vessels.
Historically, we generally have provided these services under
the following basic types of contractual relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
Time charters, where vessels are chartered to customers for a
fixed period of time at rates that are generally fixed but may
contain a variable component, such as an inflation adjustment or
a current market rate component; and |
|
|
|
Voyage charters, which are charters for shorter intervals,
usually a single round trip, that are priced on a current, or
spot, market rate. |
During 2003 and 2004, we derived 85.0% and 84.3% of our revenues
from time charters and 15.0% and 15.7% of our revenues from
voyage charters, respectively. During these periods, all our
vessels were employed on long-term time charters, except the
Granada Spirit, which operated under voyage charters in
the spot market during 2004. We do not anticipate earning
revenues from voyage charters in the foreseeable future. During
the six months ended June 30, 2005, we derived all of our
revenue from time charters.
The average remaining term of our existing long-term, fixed-rate
time charters is approximately 20 years for our LNG
carriers and 17 years for our Suezmax tankers, subject, in
certain circumstances, to termination or purchase rights. The
initial term of each of our LNG newbuilding charters is
20 years from delivery of the vessel. The average remaining
term of the time charters for the three Suezmax tankers we will
acquire upon the closing of this offering is approximately
10 years, subject to termination rights.
Generally, under our current charters the rate we charge for our
services, which we call the hire rate,
includes a capital component and an operating component.
65
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Component. The capital component typically
approximates the amounts we are required to pay under financing
obligations related to the vessel, including under bareboat
charters included in capital lease arrangements. The capital
component of our Suezmax time charters fluctuates with the
floating interest rates for the debt used to finance the related
vessels. If interest rates increase, the amount we pay under the
capital leases relating to the chartered vessels increases by
the amount of the additional interest payments, and the capital
component we receive from the related time charters
correspondingly increases. Consequently, the fluctuating portion
of the capital component has no net effect on our cash flows or
net income, but does affect our recorded voyage revenues and
interest expense. The capital component of our LNG time charters
is fixed. |
|
|
|
Operating Component. The operating component is
intended to compensate us for voyage and vessel operating
expenses and adjusts for inflation. This component is
established at the beginning of the charter and then typically
fluctuates annually based on changes in a specified
cost-of-living index. |
The time charters for the three Suezmax tankers we will acquire
from Teekay Shipping Corporation in connection with this
offering include a fixed monthly rate for their initial 12-year
term, which increases to another fixed amount for any extensions
of the initial term. These time charters do not include capital
or operating components or adjust for inflation.
For our charters, other than the RasGas II charters and the
three charters for the three Suezmax tankers, we earn a profit
from a margin built into the operating component. Under the
RasGas II charters, this margin is built into the capital
component.
In addition, we may receive additional revenues beyond the fixed
hire rate when current market rates exceed specified amounts
under our time charter for our Suezmax tanker, the Teide
Spirit.
Hire payments may be reduced or, under some charters, we must
pay liquidated damages, if the vessel does not perform to
certain of its specifications, such as if the average vessel
speed falls below a guaranteed speed or the amount of fuel
consumed to power the vessel under normal circumstances exceeds
a guaranteed amount. Historically, we have had few instances of
hire rate reductions and none that has had a material impact on
our operating results.
When the vessel is off-hire or not
available for service the customer generally is not
required to pay the hire rate and we are responsible for all
costs. Prolonged off-hire may lead to vessel substitution or
termination of the time charter. A vessel generally will be
deemed off-hire if there is a loss of time due to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
operational deficiencies; drydocking for repairs, maintenance or
inspection; equipment breakdowns; or delays due to accidents,
crewing strikes, certain vessel detentions or similar
problems; or |
|
|
|
our failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with its
specifications and contractual standards or to provide the
required crew. |
For more information on our charters, please read
Business Time Charter Contracts
General Provisions, LNG Time
Charters and Crude Oil Time
Charters.
|
|
|
Important Financial and Operational Terms and
Concepts |
We use a variety of financial and operational terms and concepts
when analyzing our performance. These include the following:
Voyage Revenues. Voyage revenues currently include
revenues only from time charters. Prior to our transfer of the
Granada Spirit to Teekay Shipping Corporation in December
2004, our voyage revenues also included some revenues from
voyage charters. Voyage revenues are affected by hire rates and
the number of calendar-ship-days a vessel operates. Voyage
revenues are also affected by the mix of business between time
and voyage charters. Hire rates for voyage charters are more
volatile, as they are typically tied to prevailing market rates
at the time of a voyage.
66
Voyage Expenses. Voyage expenses are all expenses
unique to a particular voyage, including any bunker fuel
expenses, port fees, cargo loading and unloading expenses, canal
tolls, agency fees and commissions. Voyage expenses are
typically paid by the customer under time charters and by us
under voyage charters. When we pay voyage expenses, we typically
add them to our hire rates at an approximate cost.
Net Voyage Revenues. Net voyage revenues represent
voyage revenues less voyage expenses. Because the amount of
voyage expenses we incur for a particular charter depends upon
the form of the charter, we use net voyage revenues to improve
the comparability between periods of reported revenues that are
generated by the different forms of charters.
Vessel Operating Expenses. We are responsible for
vessel operating expenses, which include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. The two largest components of vessel operating
expenses are crews and repairs and maintenance.
|
|
|
|
|
Crews. Crews represented approximately 53% of our
vessel operating expenses for 2003 and 2004 and approximately
50% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. A substantial
majority of our crewing expenses are denominated in Euros, which
is primarily a function of the nationality of our crew.
Fluctuations in the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar have
caused, and will continue to cause, fluctuations in our
operating results. |
|
|
|
Repairs and Maintenance. Repairs and maintenance
represented approximately 30% of vessel operating expenses for
2003 and 2004 and approximately 31% for the six months ended
June 30, 2005. Expenses for repairs and maintenance tend to
fluctuate from period to period because most repairs and
maintenance typically occur during periodic drydockings. Please
read Drydocking below. Because vessel
operating expenses such as repairs and maintenance are lower for
newer vessels, and our fleet is relatively new, we expect these
expenses to increase as our fleet matures. |
Income from Vessel Operations. To assist us in
evaluating our operations by segment, we sometimes analyze the
income we receive from each segment after deducting operating
expenses and depreciation and amortization, but prior to the
deduction of interest expenses, taxes, foreign currency and
interest rate swap gains or losses and other income and losses.
Please read Note 2 to the historical consolidated financial
statements of Teekay Spain and Note 4 to our unaudited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus for further information on our income from vessel
operations.
Drydocking. We must periodically drydock each of
our vessels for inspection, repairs and maintenance and any
modifications to comply with industry certification or
governmental requirements. Generally, we drydock each LNG
carrier and Suezmax tanker every five years. In addition, a
shipping society classification intermediate survey is performed
on our LNG carriers between the second and third year of the
five-year drydocking period. We capitalize a substantial portion
of the costs we incur during drydocking and for the survey and
amortize those costs on a straight-line basis from the
completion of a drydocking or intermediate survey to the
estimated completion of the next drydocking. We expense costs
related to routine repairs and maintenance incurred during
drydocking that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the
assets. The number of drydockings undertaken in a given period,
the size of the vessels and the nature of the work performed
determine the level of drydocking expenditures.
Depreciation and Amortization. Our depreciation
and amortization expense typically consists of the following
three components:
|
|
|
|
|
charges related to the depreciation of the historical cost of
our fleet (less an estimated residual value) over the estimated
useful lives of our vessels; |
|
|
|
charges related to the amortization of drydocking expenditures
over the estimated number of years to the next scheduled
drydocking; and |
|
|
|
charges related to the amortization of the fair value of the
time charters acquired in the Teekay Spain acquisition (over the
remaining terms of the charters), which was initially determined
at |
67
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $183 million in April 2004 when Teekay
Shipping Corporation acquired Teekay Spain. |
Calendar-ship-days. Calendar-ship-days are equal
to the total number of calendar days that our vessels were in
our possession during a period.
Restricted Cash Deposits. Under capital lease
arrangements for two of our LNG carriers, we (a) borrowed
under term loans and deposited the proceeds into restricted cash
accounts and (b) entered into capital leases, also referred
to as bareboat charters, for the vessels. The
restricted cash deposits, together with interest earned on the
deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the
lease arrangements, including our obligation to purchase the
vessels at the end of the lease terms. During vessel
construction, we borrowed under the term loans and made
restricted cash deposits equal to construction installment
payments.
Foreign Currency Fluctuations. Our results of
operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange
rates. The volatility in our financial results due to currency
exchange rate fluctuations can be attributed to the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized end of period revaluations. Under United
States accounting guidelines, all foreign currency-denominated
monetary assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash
equivalents, restricted cash, long-term debt and capital lease
obligations, are revalued and reported based on the prevailing
exchange rate at the end of the period. A substantial majority
of our foreign currency gains and losses are attributable to
this revaluation in respect of our Euro-denominated term loans.
Substantially all of these gains and losses are unrealized. |
|
|
|
Foreign currency revenues and expenses. A portion of our
voyage revenues are denominated in Euros. A substantial majority
of our vessel operating expenses and general and administrative
expenses are denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function
of the nationality of our crew and administrative staff. We also
have Euro-denominated interest expense and interest income
related to our Euro-denominated loans and Euro-denominated
restricted cash deposits, respectively. As a result,
fluctuations in the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar have
caused, and are likely to continue to cause, fluctuations in our
reported voyage revenues, vessel operating expenses, general and
administrative expenses, interest expense and interest income. |
Our Euro-denominated revenues currently generally approximate
our Euro-denominated expenses and Euro-denominated loan and
interest payments. For this reason, we have not entered into any
forward contracts or similar arrangements to protect against the
risk of foreign currency-denominated revenues, expenses or
monetary assets or liabilities. If our foreign
currency-denominated revenues and expenses become sufficiently
disproportionate in the future, we may engage in hedging
activities. For more information, please read
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk.
|
|
|
Items You Should Consider When Evaluating Our
Historical Financial Performance and Assessing Our Future
Prospects |
You should consider the following factors when evaluating our
historical financial performance and assessing our future
prospects:
|
|
|
|
|
Our financial results reflect changes in our capital
structure. Prior to the closing of our initial public
offering on May 10, 2005, we repaid $337.3 million of
term loans on two LNG carriers and settled related interest rate
swaps. We also settled other interest rate swaps associated with
322.8 million Euros ($390.5 million) of other term
loans and entered into new swaps of the same amount with a lower
fixed interest rate. These reductions in our debt and effective
interest rates have decreased the amount of our interest expense. |
|
|
|
Our financial results reflect the revaluation of our
assets and liabilities. On April 30, 2004, Teekay
Shipping Corporation acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding
shares of Teekay Spain through Luxco, which Teekay Shipping
Corporation subsequently contributed to us in May 2005. |
68
|
|
|
|
|
Results for periods subsequent to April 30, 2004 reflect
the comprehensive revaluation of all assets, including
intangible assets and goodwill, and liabilities of Teekay Spain
at their fair values on the date of acquisition by Teekay
Shipping Corporation. This revaluation primarily increased
depreciation and amortization expense. |
|
|
|
We have disposed of certain assets included in our
historical results of operations. Immediately prior to
its acquisition by Teekay Shipping Corporation in April 2004,
Tapias disposed of certain assets unrelated to the marine
transportation operations purchased by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. These unrelated assets included certain investments
in marketable securities and other non-shipping assets,
including real estate and a yacht. Since these unrelated assets
were held in Tapias ship-owning subsidiaries acquired by Teekay
Shipping Corporation, the financial impact of the assets is
included in our historical operating results discussed below
through the date of their disposition (as opposed to three
unrelated businesses previously held in separate subsidiaries
not acquired in the Tapias acquisition, which are not included
in our historical operating results). Excluding expenses
associated with the yacht, none of the unrelated assets had a
significant impact on our operating results. |
|
|
|
The size of our LNG carrier and Suezmax tanker fleets has
changed. Our historical results of operations reflect
changes in the size and composition of our fleet due to certain
vessel deliveries and vessel dispositions. In particular, during
most of 2003 and 2004 we had six Suezmax tankers, while during
most of the first six months of 2005 we had four Suezmax
tankers, and we have increased the size of our LNG carrier fleet
from one carrier in the last part of 2002 to four in 2005.
Please read Results of Operations below for further
details about our vessel dispositions and deliveries. |
|
|
|
We do not anticipate earning revenues from voyage charters
in the foreseeable future. Since December 2004, all of
our vessels have operated under fixed-rate time charters, and we
do not anticipate earning any revenues from voyage charters in
the foreseeable future. Our results for 2003 and 2004 reflect
relatively high voyage charter rates earned by the Granada
Spirit, which operated under voyage charters based on spot
market rates and was part of our fleet until December 2004, when
we sold it to Teekay Shipping Corporation. Teekay Shipping
Corporation contributed the Granada Spirit back to us on
May 6, 2005, and we chartered it to Teekay Shipping
Corporation under a short-term, fixed-rate time charter until we
disposed of the vessel on May 26, 2005. |
The time charters for two of our Suezmax tankers, the Sevilla
Spirit, prior to being sold in the fourth quarter of 2004,
and the Teide Spirit, which began operating in the fourth
quarter of 2004, contain a component providing for additional
revenues to us beyond the fixed hire rate when current market
rates exceed certain amounts. Accordingly, even though declining
spot market rates will not result in our receiving less than the
fixed hire rate, our results will continue to be influenced, in
part, by the variable component of the Teide Spirit
charter. During 2004 and the six months ended June 30,
2005, we earned $4.2 million and $3.0 million,
respectively, in additional revenue from this variable component.
|
|
|
|
|
We have designated our interest rate swaps as
hedges. We have entered into interest rate swaps to
hedge our interest rate risk from our floating-rate debt used to
purchase our LNG carriers. These interest rate swaps were not
designated as hedges under U.S. accounting guidelines until
April 30, 2004. Consequently, the changes in the fair
values of these swaps that occurred during 2002, 2003 and the
four months ended April 30, 2004 have been recorded in
earnings as interest rate swaps gain (loss) for
those periods. Had these interest rate swaps been designated as
hedges prior to 2003, any subsequent changes in fair value would
have been recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) to the extent the hedge was effective and
until the hedged item was recognized as income. Because the
swaps have been highly effective, the change in fair value after
April 30, 2004 has been reflected in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and, because we expect the swaps, or
replacement swaps, to continue to be highly effective, we expect
that most of the change in value will continue to be reflected
in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). For further
information on our interest rate swaps, please read Note 13
to the consolidated |
69
|
|
|
|
|
audited financial statements of Teekay Spain included elsewhere
in this prospectus. In addition, in April 2005 we settled
interest rate swaps in connection with prepayment of debt
associated with two of our LNG carriers, and settled and
replaced the interest rate swaps associated with our other two
LNG carriers. |
|
|
|
We are incurring additional general and administrative
expenses following our initial public offering. In
connection with the closing of our initial public offering, we
and certain of our subsidiaries entered into services agreements
with certain subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation
pursuant to which those subsidiaries provide us and our
subsidiaries certain services, including strategic consulting,
advisory, ship management, technical and administrative
services. Our cost for these services depends on the amount and
type of services provided during each period. The services are
valued at a reasonable, arms-length rate that includes
reimbursement of reasonable direct or indirect expenses incurred
to provide the services. We also reimburse our general partner
for all expenses it incurs on our behalf. We may also pay
incentive fees to Teekay Shipping Corporation to
reward and motivate it for pursuing LNG projects that we may
elect to undertake, and we may grant equity compensation that
would result in an expense to us. In addition, since our initial
public offering on May 10, 2005, we have begun to incur
expenses as a result of being a publicly traded limited
partnership, including costs associated with annual reports to
unitholders and SEC filings, investor relations, incremental
director and officer liability insurance costs and director
compensation. Please read Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Advisory and
Administrative Services, Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Omnibus Agreement
and Management 2005 Long-Term Incentive
Plan. |
|
|
|
We Have Derived, and We Expect to Continue to Derive, a
Substantial Majority of Our Revenues From a Limited Number of
Customers. |
In 2003 and 2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005, we
derived 84%, 75% and 83%, respectively, of our revenues from
three customers CEPSA (47%, 36% and 30%,
respectively), Repsol YPF, S.A. (26%, 18% and 34%) and Gas
Natural SDG, S.A. (11%, 21% and 19%). In addition, for the six
months ended June 30, 2005, we derived 17% of our revenues
from Unión Fenosa Gas, S.A. For more information about
these customers, please read Business Our
Customers. After we acquire the three Suezmax tankers and
related time charters from Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the
closing of this offering and after delivery of the three
RasGas II LNG newbuildings and commencement of the related
charters, we expect to derive a significant amount of revenues
from a subsidiary of ConocoPhillips and RasGas II,
respectively.
We have long-term, fixed-rate time charters with each of our
existing customers and expect to continue to derive a
substantial majority of our revenue and cash flows from them.
The loss of any customer or time charter, or a significant
decline in payments under our time charters, could materially
and adversely affect our revenues, cash flows and operating
results. Please read Risk Factors Risks
Inherent in Our Business We derive a substantial
majority of our revenues from a limited number of customers, and
the loss of any customer, time charter or vessel could result in
a significant loss of revenues and cash flow.
We could lose one of these customers or another customer or the
benefits of a time charter if:
|
|
|
|
|
the customer exercises certain rights to terminate the charter,
purchase or cause the sale of the vessel or, under some of our
charters, convert the time charter to a bareboat charter (some
of which rights are exercisable at any time); |
|
|
|
the customer terminates the charter because we fail to deliver
the vessel within a fixed period of time, the vessel is lost or
damaged beyond repair, there are serious deficiencies in the
vessel or prolonged periods of off-hire, or we default under the
charter; or |
|
|
|
under some of our time charters, the customer terminates the
charter because of the termination of the charters LNG
sales agreement supplying the LNG designated for our services,
or a prolonged |
70
|
|
|
|
|
force majeure event affecting the customer, including damage to
or destruction of relevant LNG production or regasification
facilities, war or political unrest preventing us from
performing services for that customer. |
Please read Business LNG Time
Charters Purchase Options, Terminations Rights and
Bareboat Conversion Options and Crude
Oil Time Charters Rights to Terminate Charter or
Cause Sale of Vessel for more information about the
termination and related provisions under our charters.
Our customers primary obligation under the time charter
contracts is to pay us for our services, and the contracts
provide narrow exceptions to this payment obligation for force
majeure events and, in limited circumstances as described above,
LNG supply disruptions. However, we could lose the benefits of a
time charter if the customer fails to make charter payments
because of its financial inability, disagreements with us or
otherwise. Our customers include major energy companies and
their affiliates. Factors materially and adversely affecting the
supply of or demand for LNG or crude oil or the financial
condition and operating results of our customers could affect
their ability to make charter payments to us.
|
|
|
Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. |
Teekay Shipping Corporation formed Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
(or Luxco) in April 2004 to acquire and hold Tapias.
Teekay Shipping Corporation contributed the capital stock of
Luxco to us in connection with our initial public offering on
May 10, 2005, making it one of our assets and an
intermediate holding company of our operating subsidiaries. To
make the period-to-period discussion below more comparable, our
operating results and the discussion below do not include the
results of Luxco for the two months ended June 30, 2004,
the nine months ended December 31, 2004 or the period from
January 1, 2005 to May 9, 2005 (or the 2005 Pre-IPO
Period). During these periods, Luxco had no revenues,
expenses or income, or assets or liabilities, other than:
|
|
|
|
|
advances (including accrued interest) of $465.7 million and
$312.3 million as of December 31, 2004) and
June 30, 2004, respectively, from Teekay Shipping
Corporation that Luxco used to purchase Teekay Spain and to
prepay certain debt of Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
net interest expense related to the advances of
$9.8 million, $2.4 million and $7.3 million for
the nine months ended December 31, 2004, the two months
ended June 30, 2004 and for the 2005 Pre-IPO Period; |
|
|
|
unrealized foreign exchange losses of $44.7 million and
$3.8 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2004 and the two months ended June 30, 2004, respectively,
related to the advances, which are Euro- denominated, and a
$23.8 million unrealized foreign exchange gain related to
the advances for the 2005 Pre-IPO Period; |
|
|
|
other expenses of $1.1 million, $0.1 million and
$0.1 million for those respective periods; |
|
|
|
cash and cash equivalents of $2.2 million and
$10.0 million as of December 31, 2004 and
June 30, 2004, respectively; and |
|
|
|
its ownership interest in Teekay Spain and certain purchase
rights and obligations for Suezmax tankers operated by Teekay
Spain under capital lease arrangements, which it acquired from
Teekay Spain on December 30, 2004. |
We believe the exclusion of the Luxco results make our results
more comparable because Luxcos results and financial
position relate solely to the financing of the acquisition of
Teekay Spain and repayment of Teekay Spain debt by Teekay
Shipping Corporation and do not relate to the historical results
of Teekay Spain. In addition, because the capital stock of Luxco
and the $465.7 million of advances were contributed to us
in connection with our initial public offering, these advances
and their related effects were eliminated on consolidation, as
reflected in our pro forma financial statements included in this
prospectus. For more information on Luxco, please read the
audited consolidated financial statements of Luxco and the
unaudited consolidated financial statements of Teekay LNG
Partners L.P. included elsewhere in this prospectus.
71
Results of Operations
The following tables present our operating results by reportable
segment for 2002, 2003, 2004 and the six months ended
June 30, 2004 and 2005, and compares our net voyage
revenues for those periods to the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. For ease of comparison in the following
tables and the discussion below, we have combined our results of
the various time periods set forth in our consolidated
statements of income (loss).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited, in thousands) | |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
34,162 |
|
|
$ |
24,009 |
|
|
$ |
58,171 |
|
|
$ |
21,450 |
|
|
$ |
49,043 |
|
|
$ |
70,493 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
|
31,006 |
|
|
|
23,861 |
|
|
|
54,867 |
|
|
|
21,176 |
|
|
|
48,993 |
|
|
|
70,169 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
10,143 |
|
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
|
14,886 |
|
|
|
6,563 |
|
|
|
8,140 |
|
|
|
14,703 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,726 |
|
|
|
5,285 |
|
|
|
15,011 |
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
15,045 |
|
|
|
20,603 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
2,911 |
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
4,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
8,956 |
|
|
$ |
13,103 |
|
|
$ |
22,059 |
|
|
$ |
6,930 |
|
|
$ |
23,743 |
|
|
$ |
30,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
54,418 |
|
|
$ |
5,448 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
54,102 |
|
|
$ |
32,607 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
64,438 |
|
|
$ |
59,395 |
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,788 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
4,678 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
49,099 |
|
|
$ |
5,433 |
|
|
$ |
54,532 |
|
|
$ |
49,314 |
|
|
$ |
32,484 |
|
|
$ |
81,798 |
|
|
$ |
59,760 |
|
|
$ |
59,141 |
|
|
$ |
118,901 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
15,789 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
20,584 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
20,002 |
|
|
|
10,615 |
|
|
|
30,617 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,579 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
17,760 |
|
|
|
5,630 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
19,469 |
|
|
|
15,391 |
|
|
|
34,860 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
6,237 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
4,466 |
|
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
6,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
10,494 |
|
|
$ |
3,744 |
|
|
$ |
14,238 |
|
|
$ |
3,854 |
|
|
$ |
19,315 |
|
|
$ |
23,169 |
|
|
$ |
15,823 |
|
|
$ |
31,198 |
|
|
$ |
47,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Versus Six Months Ended
June 30, 2004
We operated four LNG carriers during the six months ended
June 30, 2005 and two LNG carriers during the same period
in 2004. This increased our total calendar-ship-days by 98.9%,
from 364 days in the six months ended June 30, 2004 to
724 days in the six months ended June 30, 2005. These
two additional LNG carriers were delivered in July 2004 and
December 2004 (collectively, the LNG Deliveries).
Net voyage revenues increased 105.0% to $49.0 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $23.9 million
for the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily the
result of:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $25.1 million relating to the LNG
Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.8 million due to the effect on our
Euro-denominated revenue from the strengthening of the Euro
against the U.S. Dollar during the six months ended
June 30, 2005; |
72
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.8 million from 15.2 days of off-hire
for one of our LNG carriers during February 2005. |
Vessel operating expenses increased 72.3% to $8.1 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from
$4.7 million for the same period in 2004. This increase was
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $2.3 million relating to the LNG Deliveries; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.9 million relating to repair and
maintenance work completed on our LNG carriers during February
2005; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.2 million due to the effect on our
Euro-denominated vessel operating expenses from the
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during
the six months ended June 30, 2005 (a majority of our
vessel operating expenses are denominated in Euros, which is
primarily a function of the nationality of our crew). |
Depreciation and amortization increased 183.0% to
$15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005,
from $5.3 million for the same period in 2004. This
increase was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $7.9 million relating to the LNG Deliveries; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.1 million resulting from the
amortization, as an intangible asset, of the value of the Teekay
Spain time charters acquired on April 30, 2004; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.7 million resulting from an increase in
the book values of the Teekay Spain vessels acquired on
April 30, 2004 to their respective fair values. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we operated
either four or five Suezmax tankers, compared to six Suezmax
tankers in the same period in 2004. The results of our Suezmax
tanker segment reflect the following fleet changes during 2004
and the six months ended June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
the delivery of a tanker newbuilding, the Teide Spirit,
in November 2004 (or the Suezmax Delivery); |
|
|
|
the sale of two tankers, the Sevilla Spirit and the
Leon Spirit, in the fourth quarter of 2004 (collectively,
the Suezmax Dispositions); |
|
|
|
the sale of the Granada Spirit to Teekay Shipping
Corporation in December 2004 in connection with a significant
drydocking and re-flagging of the vessel, the contribution of
this vessel to us on May 6, 2005, and its subsequent sale
back to Teekay Shipping Corporation on May 26, 2005
(collectively, the Granada Spirit Transactions); and |
|
|
|
the delivery and concurrent sale of the Suezmax tanker
newbuilding, the Santiago Spirit, to Teekay Shipping
Corporation in March 2005. |
As a result, our total calendar-ship-days decreased by 31.8% to
745 days for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from
1,092 calendar-ship-days for the same period in 2004.
Net voyage revenues decreased 31.6% to $21.2 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $31.0 million
for the same period last year. This decrease was primarily the
result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $9.5 million relating to the Suezmax
Dispositions; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $9.0 million relating to the Granada Spirit
Transactions, which include the change in employment of the
Granada Spirit from operating on the spot market during
2004 to operating under a lower fixed-rate time charter during
the period from May 6, 2005 to May 26, 2005, when we
disposed of the vessel; |
73
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $7.3 million relating to the Suezmax
Delivery; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.4 million due to adjustments to the daily
charter rate based on inflation and increases from rising
interest rates in accordance with the time charter contracts for
all Suezmax tankers other than the Granada Spirit.
However, under the terms of our capital leases for our tankers
subject to these charter rate fluctuations, we had a
corresponding increase in our lease payments, which is reflected
as an increase to interest expense. Therefore, these interest
rate adjustments, which will continue, did not affect our cash
flow or net income. |
Vessel operating expenses decreased 34.7% to $6.6 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from
$10.1 million for the same period in 2004. This decrease
was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $5.2 million relating to the Suezmax
Dispositions and the Granada Spirit Transactions; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $1.1 million relating to the Suezmax
Delivery; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.3 million due to the effect on our
Euro-denominated vessel operating expenses from the
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during
the six months ended June 30, 2005 (a majority of our
vessel operating expenses are denominated in Euros, which is
primarily a function of the nationality of our crew); and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.3 million relating to repair and
maintenance work completed on our Suezmax tankers during January
2005. |
Depreciation and amortization decreased 42.3% to
$5.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005,
from $9.7 million for the same period in 2004. This
decrease was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $5.9 million relating to the Suezmax
Dispositions and the Granada Spirit Transactions; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $1.3 million relating to the Suezmax
Delivery; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million resulting from an increase in
the book values of the Teekay Spain vessels acquired on
April 30, 2004 to their respective fair values. |
General and administrative expenses increased 44.8% to
$4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005,
from $2.9 million for the same period in 2004. This
increase was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $0.6 million relating to the legal costs
associated with repayment of term loans and the settlement of
interest rate swaps made in connection with our initial public
offering; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million relating to a bonus program for
shore staff adopted in December 2004; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.3 million associated with
(a) services agreements we and certain of our subsidiaries
entered into with subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation in
connection with our initial public offering, (b) fees and
cost reimbursements of our general partner and
(c) additional expenses as a result of being a publicly
traded limited partnership; and |
|
|
|
a number of smaller factors that decreased general and
administrative expenses by $0.1 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2005. |
74
Interest expense increased 21.6% to $36.6 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2005, from $30.1 million for
the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily the result
of:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $5.4 million relating to debt incurred to
finance the LNG Deliveries and Suezmax Delivery, partially
offset by the reduction in interest expense from the repayments
of debt with the proceeds of the Suezmax Dispositions; |
|
|
|
an increase of $4.6 million relating to the increase in
capital lease obligations in connection with the delivery of one
LNG carrier in December 2004, partially offset by lower interest
expense resulting from scheduled capital lease repayments on a
second LNG carrier that delivered in August 2003 (these vessels
have been financed pursuant to Spanish tax lease arrangements,
under which we borrow under term loans and deposit the proceeds
into restricted cash accounts and enter into capital leases for
the vessels; as a result, these increases in interest expense
are offset by a corresponding increase in the interest income
from restricted cash); and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.8 million due to the effect on our
Euro-denominated debt of the strengthening of the Euro against
the U.S. Dollar during the six months ended June 30,
2005; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $4.3 million resulting from the repayment in
April 2005 of $337.3 million of term loans and the
settlement of related interest rate swaps. |
Interest income of $12.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 remained relatively unchanged compared to
$12.2 million for the same period in 2004. Interest income
primarily reflects interest earned on our restricted cash
deposits relating to two of our LNG carriers. This change was
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.1 million resulting from
$76.3 million of cash withdrawals during December 2004 used
to make scheduled repayments of capital lease obligations
(including accrued interest); |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.4 million relating to $54.5 million
of additional cash being placed in restricted cash deposits
during December 2004; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.6 million due to the effect on our
Euro-denominated deposits from the strengthening of the Euro
against the U.S. Dollar during the six months ended
June 30, 2005. |
Foreign currency exchange gains were $46.8 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to
$11.8 million for the same period in 2004. These foreign
currency exchange gains, substantially all of which were
unrealized, related primarily to the relevant period-end
revaluations of Euro-denominated term loans for financial
reporting purposes. These gains reflect a stronger
U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date of revaluation.
We incurred gains of $4.0 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2004 due to changes in the fair values of
our interest rate swaps. These interest rate swaps were not
designated as hedges under U.S. accounting guidelines until
April 30, 2004. Consequently, the changes in fair values of
these swaps that occurred prior to April 30, 2004 were
recorded in earnings as interest rate swaps gain
(loss).
Other loss of $16.3 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2005 resulted primarily from:
|
|
|
|
|
a $7.8 million loss from the settlement of interest rate
swaps that were being used to hedge the interest rate risk on
two of our term loans we repaid in April 2005; |
|
|
|
a $7.5 million loss from the write-off of capitalized loan
costs relating to the two term loans we repaid in April 2005; |
|
|
|
income tax expense of $0.1 million; and |
|
|
|
other miscellaneous expenses of $1.1 million; |
75
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
a $0.2 million gain from the sale of the Granada Spirit
to Teekay Shipping Corporation during May 2005. |
Other loss of $10.3 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2004 resulted primarily from:
|
|
|
|
|
a $11.9 million loss on the sale of non-shipping assets by
Teekay Spain immediately preceding its acquisition by Luxco on
April 30, 2004; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
income tax recoveries of $1.2 million; and |
|
|
|
other miscellaneous income and gains on the sale of marketable
securities of $0.4 million. |
As a result of the foregoing factors, net income was
$36.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005,
compared to net income of $9.6 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2004.
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Versus Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Our four LNG carriers were delivered into our fleet in September
2002, August 2003, July 2004 and December 2004. Accordingly, our
total calendar-ship-days increased by 74.1%, from 518 days
in 2003 to 902 days in 2004.
Net voyage revenues increased 82.1% to $59.1 million for
2004, from $32.5 million for 2003, which was attributable
to the addition of our LNG carriers during 2003 and 2004 and
higher rates earned by more recently delivered LNG carriers.
Vessel operating expenses increased 81.3% to $10.6 million
for 2004, compared to $5.9 million for 2003. Approximately
$4.4 million of the increase was attributable to the
delivery of our LNG carriers during 2003 and 2004, and
approximately $0.3 million of the increase was attributable
to the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar in
2004. A majority of our vessel operating expenses are
denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function of the
nationality of our crew.
Depreciation and amortization increased 173.4% to
$15.4 million for 2004, from $5.6 million for 2003,
primarily due to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the addition of our three LNG carriers in August 2003 and July
and December 2004; |
|
|
|
the amortization, as an intangible asset, of the value of the
Tapias time charters acquired on April 30, 2004; and |
|
|
|
increased depreciation resulting from recording the Tapias
vessels at their acquisition cost as compared to their
depreciated value prior to the acquisition. |
During 2003, we operated six Suezmax tankers. During the fourth
quarter of 2004, we took delivery of one Suezmax newbuilding and
sold three Suezmax tankers. As a result, our total
calendar-ship-days decreased by 5.3% from 2,190 days in
2003 to 2,073 days in 2004.
Net voyage revenues increased 21.2% to $59.8 million for
2004, from $49.3 million for 2003. The increase was
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $5.1 million increase in net voyage revenues for 2004
compared to 2003 due to increases in average spot market rates
earned by the Granada Spirit; |
|
|
|
a $4.2 million increase in net voyage revenues for 2004
compared to 2003 due to an increase in the voyage revenues
earned from a charter with a variable component based on spot
market rates; and |
76
|
|
|
|
|
a $2.9 million increase in net voyage revenues due to fewer
off-hire days from drydocking in 2004 compared to 2003. |
These increases were partially offset by a decrease of
$1.2 million in net voyage revenues due to a net reduction
in fleet size and corresponding reduction in calendar-ship-days
in 2004, and by a $0.5 million decrease in net voyage
revenues in 2004 from three time charters that fluctuate based
on changes in interest rates. However, under the terms of our
capital leases for the three vessels with fluctuating charter
rates, we had a corresponding reduction in our lease payments,
which is reflected as a reduction of interest expense.
Vessel operating expenses decreased 2.8% to $20.0 million
for 2004, compared to $20.6 million for 2003, primarily due
to the reduction in calendar-ship-days, partially offset by
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar.
Depreciation and amortization increased 9.6% to
$19.5 million for 2004, from $17.8 million for 2003.
The increase was primarily due to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the amortization, as an intangible asset, of the value of the
Tapias time charters acquired on April 30, 2004; and |
|
|
|
increased depreciation resulting from recording the Tapias
vessels at their acquisition cost as compared to their
depreciated value prior to the acquisition. |
General and administrative expenses decreased 27.2% to
$6.4 million for 2004, from $8.8 million for 2003,
primarily due to a $3.0 million decrease in expenses
resulting from four months of expenses associated with a yacht
and certain other non-shipping assets disposed of by Tapias
immediately prior to its acquisition on April 30, 2004 by
Teekay Shipping Corporation, compared to a full year of these
expenses included in our results for 2003. The decrease in
general and administrative expenses in 2004 was partially offset
by an increase of $0.6 million in shore-staff
performance-based bonuses.
Interest expense increased 77.9% to $62.0 million for 2004,
from $34.9 million for 2003. This increase primarily
reflects increases in interest-bearing debt and capital lease
obligations associated with the delivery of one LNG carrier in
each of August 2003 and July 2004. For more information, please
read Liquidity and Capital
Resources Ship Financing Arrangements below.
Interest income increased 162.3% to $22.1 million for 2004,
from $8.4 million for 2003. This increase was primarily due
to interest earned on increased restricted cash deposits.
Foreign currency exchange loss decreased to $16.1 million
for 2004 from $71.5 million for 2003. These foreign
currency exchange losses, substantially all of which were
unrealized, are due substantially to the period-end revaluation
of Euro-denominated term loans for financial reporting purposes.
The higher loss in 2003 reflects the greater weakening of the
U.S. Dollar against the Euro during 2003 compared to 2004.
We incurred gains of $4.0 million in 2004 and
$14.7 million in 2003 due to the changes in fair values of
our interest rate swaps. These interest rate swaps were not
designated as hedges under U.S. accounting guidelines until
April 30, 2004. Consequently, the changes in fair values of
these swaps that occurred during the four months ended
April 30, 2004 and 2003 have been recorded in earnings as
interest rate swaps gain (loss) for those periods.
Other loss of $7.6 million for 2004 resulted from:
|
|
|
|
|
a $11.9 million loss on the sale of non-shipping assets by
Tapias prior to its acquisition on April 30, 2004 by Teekay
Shipping Corporation; and |
|
|
|
$0.1 million of minority interest expense; |
77
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
$3.4 million of gains on the sale of vessels and equipment; |
|
|
|
$0.7 million of income tax recoveries; |
|
|
|
$0.1 million of gains on the sale of marketable
securities; and |
|
|
|
$0.3 million of other miscellaneous income. |
Other income of $0.6 million for 2003 resulted from:
|
|
|
|
|
a $1.6 million gain on the sale of marketable
securities; and |
|
|
|
$2.2 million of other miscellaneous income; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
$3.0 million of income taxes; and |
|
|
|
$0.2 million of minority interest expense. |
The marketable securities, other miscellaneous income and
minority interest expense all relate to non-shipping assets
disposed of by Tapias prior to its acquisition by Teekay
Shipping Corporation.
As a result of the foregoing, net loss decreased to
$12.6 million for 2004 from $59.4 million for 2003.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Versus Year Ended
December 31, 2002
We took delivery of our first LNG carrier in September 2002 and
our second LNG carrier in August 2003. Accordingly, our results
reflect the operation of one LNG carrier for approximately three
months in 2002, and one LNG carrier for all of 2003 and an
additional LNG carrier for part of 2003, increasing total
calendar-ship-days from 93 days in 2002 to 518 days in
2003.
Net voyage revenues increased to $32.5 million for 2003
from $5.4 million for 2002, due to an increase in total
calendar-ship-days.
Vessel operating expenses increased to $5.9 million for
2003, compared to $0.3 million for 2002, primarily due to
the increase in total calendar-ship-days. Approximately
$5.5 million of the increase was attributable to the
increase in calendar-ship-days and approximately
$0.1 million of the increase was attributable to the
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar.
Depreciation and amortization increased to $5.6 million for
2003, from $1.1 million for 2002, primarily due to the
increase in our fleet size.
The number of vessels in our Suezmax tanker fleet remained
unchanged for 2003 compared to 2002. During both periods, we had
six Suezmax tankers and operated 2,190 calendar-ship-days.
Net voyage revenues increased 0.4% to $49.3 million for
2003, from $49.1 million for 2002, primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $4.5 million increase in voyage revenues from the
Granada Spirit from the prior period, due primarily to an
increase in average spot market rates; |
substantially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
a $3.7 million decrease in voyage revenues due to a greater
number of off-hire days from drydocking in 2003 compared to
2002; and |
|
|
|
to a lesser extent, from $0.6 million in decreased voyage
revenues from three time charters that fluctuate based on
changes in interest rates. |
78
Vessel operating expenses increased 30.4% to $20.6 million
for 2003, compared to $15.8 million for 2002. Approximately
half of the total increase in vessel operating expenses was due
to Euro-denominated expenses and the strengthening of the Euro
against the U.S. Dollar. A majority of our vessel operating
expenses are denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function
of the nationality of our crew. The remaining increase was due
to an increase in repair and maintenance activity in 2003, as
four of our Suezmax tankers were drydocked during 2003 compared
to one in 2002.
Depreciation and amortization increased 7.1% to
$17.8 million for 2003, from $16.6 million for 2002.
The increase was due to an increase in amortization of
drydocking costs of $2.0 million in 2003 from
$0.8 million for 2002.
General and administrative expenses increased 35.3% to
$8.8 million for 2003, from $6.5 million for 2002,
primarily due to a $1.9 million increase in expenses
resulting from a full years inclusion of expenses in 2003
for a yacht that was purchased during the latter half of 2002.
The yacht was sold to Tapiass then controlling shareholder
immediately prior to the April 2004 sale of Tapias to Teekay
Shipping Corporation.
Interest expense increased 92.8% to $34.9 million for 2003,
from $18.1 million for 2002. This increase primarily
reflects increases in interest-bearing debt and capital lease
obligations associated with the delivery of two LNG carriers in
September 2002 and August 2003. For more information, please
read Liquidity and Capital
Resources Ship Financing Arrangements below.
Interest income increased 60.7% to $8.4 million for 2003,
from $5.2 million for 2002. This increase was primarily due
to interest earned on increased restricted cash deposits.
Foreign currency exchange loss increased to $71.5 million
in 2003, from $44.3 million for 2002. These foreign
currency exchange losses are due primarily to the year-end
revaluation of our two Euro-denominated term loans for financial
reporting purposes. During 2003, the U.S. Dollar weakened
considerably against the Euro.
During 2002 and 2003, we incurred a loss of $71.4 million
and a gain of $14.7 million, respectively, due to the
changes in fair values of our interest rate swaps. These changes
in value were primarily due to changes in interest rates in the
corresponding periods. For more information, please read
Overview Items You Should
Consider When Evaluating Our Historical Financial Performance
and Assessing Our Future Prospects We have
designated our interest rate swaps as hedges above.
Other income of $0.6 million for 2002 was comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $0.5 million gain on the sale of marketable securities; |
|
|
|
$0.1 million in dividend income; and |
|
|
|
$2.4 million of other miscellaneous income; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
$2.2 million of income taxes; and |
|
|
|
$0.2 million of minority interest expense. |
Other income of $0.6 million during 2003 was comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $1.6 million gain on sale of marketable
securities; and |
|
|
|
$2.2 million of other miscellaneous income; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
|
|
$3.0 million in income taxes; and |
|
|
|
$0.2 million of minority interest expense. |
As a result of the foregoing, net loss decreased to
$59.4 million for 2003, from $113.8 million for 2002.
79
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As at September 30, 2005, our total cash and cash
equivalents totaled $59.9 million, compared to
$154.2 million and $21.3 million at December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively. Our total liquidity, including cash
and undrawn long-term borrowings, was $159.9 million as at
September 30, 2005, compared to $154.2 million and
$21.3 million as at December 31, 2004 and 2003. Total
liquidity as at September 30, 2005 included our undrawn
$100 million senior secured revolving credit facility we
entered into in connection with our initial public offering. We
may use this credit facility for general partnership purposes
and to fund cash distributions. Under the credit facility, we
are required to reduce all borrowings used to fund cash
distributions to zero for a period of at least 15 consecutive
days during any 12-month period. This credit facility is
available to us until September 2009.
Our primary short-term liquidity needs are to pay quarterly
distributions on our outstanding units and to fund general
working capital requirements and drydocking expenditures, while
our long-term liquidity needs primarily relate to expansion and
maintenance capital expenditures and debt repayment. Expansion
capital expenditures primarily represent the purchase or
construction of vessels to the extent the expenditures increase
the operating capacity or revenue generated by our fleet, while
maintenance capital expenditures primarily consist of drydocking
expenditures and expenditures to replace vessels in order to
maintain the operating capacity of, or revenue generated by, our
fleet. We anticipate that our primary sources of funds for our
short-term liquidity needs will be cash flows from operations,
while our long-term sources of funds will be from cash from
operations, term loans and other debt or equity financings.
We believe that cash flows from operations will be sufficient to
meet our short-term liquidity needs for at least the next
12 months. We may need to raise additional capital to
finance the purchase of Teekay Shipping Corporations
interest in Teekay Nakilat, which purchase is anticipated to
occur in the fourth quarter of 2006, and the purchase of our
five Suezmax tankers that we are required to purchase at the end
of their capital lease terms, which will be at various times
from 2007 to 2011 and range from $39.4 million to
$43.5 million per vessel. We anticipate that we will be
able to purchase these five tankers by assuming the outstanding
financing obligations that relate to them; however, we may be
required to obtain separate debt or equity financing to complete
the purchases if the lenders do not consent to our assuming the
financing obligations. We may be unable to raise additional
funds on favorable terms, if at all. For more information,
please read Ongoing Capital Expenditures
and Ship Financing Arrangements below.
Cash Flows. The following table summarizes our
cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) operating,
financing and investing activities for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Net cash flow from operating activities
|
|
$ |
20,418 |
|
|
$ |
18,318 |
|
|
$ |
22,189 |
|
|
$ |
19,526 |
|
|
$ |
25,025 |
|
Net cash flow from financing activities
|
|
|
176,316 |
|
|
|
(277,616 |
) |
|
|
69,799 |
|
|
|
282,029 |
|
|
|
(160,245 |
) |
Net cash flow from investing activities
|
|
|
(199,218 |
) |
|
|
262,766 |
|
|
|
40,887 |
|
|
|
(301,367 |
) |
|
|
34,685 |
|
Operating Cash Flows. Net cash flow from operating
activities increased to $25.0 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2005, from $19.5 million for the same
period in 2004, primarily reflecting the increase in the size of
our LNG fleet. Net cash flow from operating activities increased
to $22.2 million in 2004, from $18.3 million in 2003,
mainly reflecting the increase in our LNG fleet size and the
significant increase in our average spot market hire rates for
the Granada Spirit. Net cash flow from operating
activities decreased to $18.3 million in 2003, from
$20.4 million in 2002, primarily due to an increase in the
number of drydockings, partially offset by the increase in our
LNG fleet size. Net cash flow from
80
operating activities depends upon the timing of drydocking
expenditures, repairs and maintenance activity, vessel additions
and dispositions, foreign currency rates, changes in interest
rates, fluctuations in working capital balances and spot market
hire rates (to the extent we have vessels operating in the spot
tanker market or our hire rates are partially affected by spot
market rates). The number of vessel drydockings tends to be
uneven between years. For more information on our expected
drydocking expenditures, please read Ongoing
Capital Expenditures below.
Financing Cash Flows. Our investments in vessels
and equipment have been financed primarily with term loans and
capital lease arrangements. Net proceeds from long-term debt
were $10.9 million, $7.1 million, $133.7 million,
$211.0 million and $228.5 million, respectively, for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
During the six months ended June 30, 2004, Teekay Shipping
Corporation advanced to us $306.0 million, primarily for
the purchase of Teekay Spain. During the six months ended
June 30, 2005, Teekay Shipping Corporation advanced to us
an additional $353.1 million, which we used together with
existing cash balances to repay certain term loans and settle
certain interest rate swaps. Teekay Shipping Corporation
contributed to us all but $54.9 million of these loans and
other assets in connection with our initial public offering in
exchange for notes payable of $129.4 million (which we
repaid with proceeds of the offering) and partnership interests
in us.
During 2003, we sold and leased back our two LNG carriers for
proceeds of $399.2 million. We used $248.1 million of
the proceeds to repay debt. At approximately the same time, we
made restricted deposits of $242.1 million that, together
with the $16.9 million and $56.5 million of restricted
cash we deposited in 2002 and 2004, respectively, less the
$76.3 million we used to repay a portion of our capital
lease obligation in 2004, approximates the present value of the
remaining amounts owing under the capital lease agreements for
these two vessels, including the amounts required for us to
fulfill our obligation to purchase these two LNG carriers in
2006 and 2011. The deposits were primarily funded with term
loans and a Spanish government grant in the form of a one-time
payment (in lieu of receiving a subsidized financing rate) on
the delivery of one of the LNG carriers. We discuss below our
future commitments for capital expenditures related to
newbuildings.
Investing Cash Flows. During the six months ended
June 30, 2005, we incurred capital expenditures for vessels
and equipment of $48.9 million. These capital expenditures
primarily represent installment payments for two Suezmax
tankers, the Toledo Spirit, which was delivered in July
2005, and the Santiago Spirit, which was delivered and
sold in March 2005. During the six months ended June 30,
2005, we sold two Suezmax tankers to Teekay Shipping Corporation
for proceeds of $83.6 million, of which $63.0 million
was used to repay debt and the remaining $20.6 million was
part of our June 30, 2005 cash balance. Net cash used in
investing activities for 2002 to 2004 consisted primarily of
construction costs relating to the three Suezmax tankers and
four LNG carriers we had under construction at various times
during that period. These costs totaled $89.2 million,
$133.6 million and $186.8 million, respectively,
during 2004, 2003 and 2002. In 2004, we sold three Suezmax
tankers for proceeds of $74.3 million and also sold and
leased back one Suezmax tanker for proceeds of
$49.4 million. One of these Suezmax tankers, the Granada
Spirit, was sold to another Teekay Shipping Corporation
subsidiary. Upon the closing of our initial public offering,
Teekay Shipping Corporation contributed the Granada
Spirit back to us and chartered it under a short-term,
fixed-rate time charter until we disposed of the vessel on
May 26, 2005. As mentioned above, in 2003 we sold and
leased backed two LNG carriers. In 2002 we purchased an entity
that owned an LNG carrier on long-term charter to a Spanish oil
company from our then controlling shareholder for
$15.8 million (net of cash assumed of $5.1 million),
which was substantially paid in 2002 and 2003.
|
|
|
Ongoing Capital Expenditures |
Marine transportation of LNG and crude oil is a
capital-intensive business, requiring significant investment to
maintain an efficient fleet and to stay in regulatory compliance.
81
Over the next five years, we estimate that we will spend an
average of approximately $1.3 million for each Suezmax
tanker, including the three Suezmax tankers we will acquire from
Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of this offering,
and approximately $2.8 million for each LNG carrier for
drydocking and society classification surveys. As our fleet
matures and expands, our drydocking expenses will likely
increase. Ongoing costs for compliance with environmental
regulations are primarily included as part of our drydocking and
society classification survey costs or are a component of our
operating expenses. We are not aware of any regulatory changes
or environmental liabilities that we anticipate will have a
material impact on our current or future operations.
Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct
from operating surplus each quarter estimated maintenance
capital expenditures, as opposed to actual maintenance capital
expenditures in order to reduce disparities in operating surplus
caused by fluctuating maintenance capital expenditures, such as
drydocking and vessel replacement. These capital expenditures to
maintain our fleet are substantial, and will increase after we
acquire the three Suezmax tankers from Teekay Shipping
Corporation upon the closing of this offering. We estimate that,
based on our current fleet and these three additional tankers,
our annual maintenance capital expenditures for purposes of
calculating operating surplus will be $21.2 million per
year, which is comprised of $5.3 million for drydocking
costs for all of these vessels and $15.9 million, including
financing costs, for replacing our LNG carriers and Suezmax
tankers at the end of their useful lives. The increase in these
estimated annual amounts that we attribute to the three Suezmax
tankers we will acquire upon the closing of this offering are
$4.7 million for maintenance capital expenditures,
$0.8 million for dry docking costs and $3.9 million
for replacement costs. The actual cost of replacing our LNG
carriers and Suezmax tankers will depend on a number of factors,
including prevailing market conditions, charter rates and the
availability and cost of financing at the time of replacement.
The board of directors of our general partner with the approval
of its conflicts committee may determine to increase the annual
amount of our estimated maintenance capital expenditures. In
years when estimated maintenance capital expenditures are higher
than actual maintenance capital expenditures, the amount of cash
available for distribution to unitholders will be lower than if
actual maintenance capital expenditures were deducted from
operating surplus.
|
|
|
Historical Capital Expenditures |
The following table summarizes total capital expenditures for
drydocking and for vessels and equipment for the periods
presented. It does not include expenditures for the three
Suezmax tankers we will acquire from Teekay Shipping Corporation
in connection with the closing of this offering. In the past, we
categorized our vessel replacement and fleet expansion
expenditures as expenditures for vessels and
equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
$ |
984 |
|
|
$ |
4,711 |
|
|
$ |
4,085 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
186,755 |
|
|
|
133,628 |
|
|
|
89,225 |
|
|
|
10,487 |
|
|
|
48,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
187,739 |
|
|
$ |
138,339 |
|
|
$ |
93,310 |
|
|
$ |
10,487 |
|
|
$ |
48,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ship Financing Arrangements |
We have employed or may employ the following types of financing
arrangements to purchase our vessels.
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loans. Two of our LNG carriers have been
financed with term loans that are collateralized by first
preferred mortgages. We repaid these term loans in April 2005. |
82
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Arrangements. Under the capital
lease arrangements for our Suezmax tankers on charter to CEPSA,
we leased the vessels from third parties pursuant to bareboat
charters and make lease payments based on the lessees
repayment schedule for the vessel construction financing costs.
At the end of the lease terms, we are obligated to purchase the
vessels for a fixed price based on the remaining unamortized
portion of the vessel construction financing costs. |
|
|
|
Spanish Tax Lease Arrangements. Under capital
lease arrangements for two of our LNG carriers, we have borrowed
under term loans and deposited the proceeds into restricted cash
accounts. Concurrently, we entered into capital leases for the
vessels pursuant to bareboat charters and recorded the vessels
as assets when the vessels began operations. The restricted cash
deposits, together with interest earned on the deposits, will
equal the remaining amounts we owe under the lease arrangements,
including our obligations to purchase the vessels at the end of
the lease terms. At the end of the lease terms, the amounts
remaining in the restricted cash deposit accounts will be used
to purchase the vessels, and we will obtain title to the vessels. |
|
|
|
Warehousing. Teekay Shipping Corporations
subsidiary, Teekay Nakilat, has contracted to have built the
three RasGas II vessels. Upon delivery of the first vessel,
we will acquire all of Teekay Shipping Corporations
interest in Teekay Nakilat for a price that will reimburse
Teekay Shipping Corporation for (1) its costs related to
the construction of the three vessels and (2) a reasonable
cost of capital on vessel construction payments. Please read
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase RasGas II
Interest. |
The following table identifies each vessel and newbuilding in
our fleet, the type of financing arrangement currently
associated with each vessel and our remaining financial
commitments under each type of arrangement as at June 30,
2005. Each amount associated with a newbuilding is an estimate.
Please read Contractual Obligations and
Contingencies below for more information on our
newbuilding and other purchase commitments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel |
|
Type of Financing Arrangement |
|
Financial Commitment | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(in dollars) | |
Operating LNG Vessels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispania Spirit
|
|
Credit facility(1) |
|
|
None |
(1) |
Galicia Spirit
|
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
Catalunya Spirit
|
|
Spanish tax lease |
|
|
176.0 million |
(2) |
Madrid Spirit
|
|
Spanish tax lease |
|
|
213.2 million |
(2) |
LNG Newbuildings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hull No. 2238
|
|
Warehousing |
|
|
140.1 million |
(3) |
Hull No. 2239
|
|
Warehousing |
|
|
140.1 million |
(3) |
Hull No. 2240
|
|
Warehousing |
|
|
140.1 million |
(3) |
Operating Suezmax Tankers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenerife Spirit
|
|
Capital lease(4) |
|
|
45.5 million |
(4) |
Algeciras Spirit
|
|
Capital lease(4) |
|
|
45.7 million |
(4) |
Huelva Spirit
|
|
Capital lease(4) |
|
|
43.4 million |
(4) |
Teide Spirit
|
|
Capital lease(4) |
|
|
49.7 million |
(4) |
Toledo Spirit
|
|
Capital lease(5) |
|
|
50.5 million |
(5) |
Acquired Suezmax Tankers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
African Spirit
|
|
None (6) |
|
|
None |
|
Asian Spirit
|
|
None (6) |
|
|
None |
|
European Spirit
|
|
None (6) |
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
$1,038.6 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Our $100 million revolving credit facility is secured by a
mortgage on the Hispania Spirit and a pledge of certain
shares of our subsidiary operating this LNG carrier. As at
June 30, 2005, this credit facility was undrawn. |
83
|
|
(2) |
Represents the principal amount on the term loans used to make
the restricted cash deposit that will fully pay the capital
lease obligations and pay capitalized interest and other
miscellaneous construction costs. |
|
(3) |
We estimate that the total cost to purchase Teekay Shipping
Corporations 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat, which owns
the three RasGas II LNG newbuilding carriers, will be
approximately $420.5 million. However, actual costs will
vary depending on the amount of miscellaneous construction costs
and when the vessels are actually delivered, which affects the
amount of capitalized interest. For purposes of this table, we
have provided our estimate and divided the amounts evenly over
the three vessels. If Teekay Shipping Corporation completes
U.K. lease arrangements for the RasGas II vessels, our
equity contribution relating to the vessels will be reduced
significantly. Please read U.K. Lease
Arrangements below. |
|
(4) |
Under the terms of the capital leases, the vessel owner enters
into a seven-year capital lease with financial institutions and
then leases the vessel to us for seven years pursuant to a
bareboat charter. At the end of the term, we are obligated to
purchase the vessel at a fixed price based on the unamortized
portion of the vessel construction financing costs. The purchase
obligations will be at various times from 2007 to 2011 and range
from $39.4 million to $43.5 million per vessel. We
expect that we will complete the purchase by assuming the
outstanding financing obligations; however, we may be required
to obtain separate debt or equity financing to complete the
purchases if the requisite lenders do not consent to our
assuming the financing obligations. The amount in the table
represents our remaining capital lease obligations, including
the amount of the vessel purchase price. |
|
(5) |
As at June 30, 2005, we had made $14.3 million of
progress payments on this vessel. We financed additional
construction installment payments prior to its delivery in July
2005, with temporary debt financing. We permanently financed the
vessel upon its delivery pursuant to financing arrangements
substantially similar to those for our other Suezmax tankers
subject to capital lease arrangements. |
|
|
(6) |
We will acquire these vessels from Teekay Shipping Corporation
upon the closing of this offering. We anticipate entering into a
$137.5 million credit facility secured by the vessels
following the closing of this offering. Please read
Certain Relationship and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase Suezmax Tankers
and Time Charters. |
|
Warehousing of RasGas II LNG Newbuildings. Teekay
Shipping Corporation, through it subsidiaries, is constructing
the three RasGas II LNG newbuildings, which are scheduled
for delivery in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first half of
2007. Teekay Shipping Corporation has agreed to transfer to us
its 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat, which owns these vessels and
the related 20-year fixed-rate time charters with
RasGas II. The transfer will occur upon delivery of the
first LNG newbuilding. This arrangement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation regarding the RasGas II vessels allows us to
defer our need to finance these vessels until closer to their
delivery and operation, which will reduce our need to finance
construction installments and related payments. For more
information, please read Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Agreement to Purchase
RasGas II Interest.
The RasGas II LNG newbuilding carriers require total
shipyard payments of approximately $514.5 million, or
approximately $171.5 million for each vessel. We estimate
that the total amount we will pay Teekay Shipping Corporation
for its 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat will be approximately
$420.5 million. Approximately $327.7 million of
long-term vessel financing is in place for Teekay Shipping
Corporations 70% share of the construction cost of these
three vessels. We will assume those financing obligations when
we acquire Teekay Shipping Corporations interest in Teekay
Nakilat and Teekay Shipping Corporation has agreed to assist us
in assuming these financing obligations by remaining as a
guarantor, if necessary, in exchange for an appropriate fee. We
will be required to fund the remaining approximately
$92.8 million of the purchase price. Payment for Teekay
Shipping Corporations interest in Teekay Nakilat will be
made at approximately the time the first newbuilding is
delivered, and will be made in cash or our common units, at
Teekay Shipping Corporations election, or other
consideration as agreed between Teekay Shipping Corporation and
the conflicts committee of our general partners board
of directors.
U.K. Lease Arrangements. We anticipate that Teekay
Shipping Corporation will complete U.K. lease arrangements
to finance the three RasGas II LNG newbuilding carriers.
Under these arrangements, a United Kingdom subsidiary of Teekay
Nakilat would lease the vessels, as lessee, pursuant to bareboat
charters. Concurrently with entering into the leases, the
current shipowning subsidiaries of Teekay Nakilat
84
would make restricted cash deposits that would secure bank
letters of credit that in turn would secure substantially all of
the lessees obligations under the leases. Teekay Shipping
Corporation would guarantee 70% of the lessees obligations
under the leases, which guarantee we may assume upon our
acquisition of Teekay Shipping Corporations 70% interest
in Teekay Nakilat. Upon termination of the leases, the lessor
would be paid remaining amounts under the leases through
payments under the letters of credit and payments by the lessee,
who would arrange for the sale of the vessels. Proceeds of the
vessel sales would be used to pay any remaining vessel financing
costs, with any balance to be retained by the lessee.
We estimate that these U.K. lease arrangements would increase
our financial returns from the RasGas II project by
reducing our equity contribution required for the vessels by
approximately $40 million from the current estimate of
$92.8 million, while only reducing the annual EBITDA
attributable to the project by approximately 3%. Teekay Shipping
Corporation may be unable to complete these lease arrangements.
We and Teekay Shipping Corporation regularly evaluate and pursue
opportunities to provide the marine transportation requirements
for new or expanding LNG projects. Teekay Shipping Corporation
currently has submitted bids to provide transportation
requirements for LNG projects and we and Teekay Shipping
Corporation may submit additional bids from time to time. The
award process relating to LNG transportation opportunities
typically involves various stages and takes several months to
complete. The award process for some of the projects upon which
Teekay Shipping Corporation has bid are in advanced stages.
Neither we nor Teekay Shipping Corporation may be awarded
charters relating to any of the projects we are or it pursues.
If any LNG project charters are awarded to Teekay Shipping
Corporation, it must offer them to us pursuant to the terms of
the omnibus agreement. Please read Certain Relationships
and Related Party Transactions Omnibus
Agreement. Awards of LNG projects announced by Teekay
Shipping Corporation in July and August 2005 and that we will
have a right to acquire from it include those described above
under Summary Recent Developments
Potential Additional Projects above. If we elect pursuant
to the omnibus agreement to obtain either of these LNG projects
or any additional projects Teekay Shipping Corporation may be
awarded, or if we bid on and are awarded contracts relating to
any other LNG project, we will need to incur significant capital
expenditures to build the LNG carriers needed to fulfill the
transportation requirements. We would finance the capital
expenditures for any project we obtain through internally
generated funds or debt or equity financings, or through a
warehousing or other type of arrangement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation or a third party.
Existing $100 Million Credit Facility. In connection
with our initial public offering, one of our LNG carrier-owning
subsidiaries amended its term loan agreement to provide for a
five-year $100 million senior secured revolving credit
facility. The facility may be used by us for general partnership
purposes and to fund cash distributions. Under the revolving
credit facility, we are required to reduce all borrowings used
to fund cash distributions to zero for a period of at least
fifteen consecutive days during any twelve-month period.
Our obligations under the credit facility are secured by a first
priority security interest on one of our LNG carriers, the
Hispania Spirit, and a pledge of certain shares of our
subsidiary operating the carrier. Borrowings under the credit
facility may be prepaid at any time in minimum or multiple
amounts of $5.0 million. Indebtedness under the facility
will bear interest at a rate equal to the sum of the LIBOR rate
(as defined in the credit facility) plus a margin of 1.2%.
New Credit Facility. Following the closing of this
offering, we anticipate entering into a $137.5 million
credit facility, which will be modified from an existing
facility of Teekay Shipping Corporation relating to the three
Suezmax tankers we will acquire upon the closing of this
offering. While the terms of the new facility have not yet been
finalized, we expect that it will provide for a nine-year
revolving credit facility to be used for general partnership
purposes. Our obligations under the credit
85
facility will be secured by, among other things, mortgages on
the Suezmax tankers the African Spirit, the Asian
Spirit and the European Spirit and the related time
charters. We anticipate that indebtedness under the facility
will bear interest at a rate equal to the LIBOR rate (as defined
in the credit facility), plus a margin of 0.5%, and that we will
reimburse Teekay Shipping Corporation for its unamortized loan
costs under the existing facility.
|
|
|
Covenants and Other Restrictions in Our Financing
Agreements |
All of our vessel financing is arranged on a vessel-by-vessel
basis, and each financing is secured by the applicable vessel.
Our capital leases do not contain financial or restrictive
covenants other than those relating to operation and maintenance
of the vessels.
The term loan agreements for our LNG carriers, including the
RasGas II financing agreements we expect to assume, are
with separate shipowning subsidiaries, although Teekay Spain
guarantees the payments under the term loan agreements for all
of our existing LNG carriers (or Teekay Shipping Corporation in
the case of the RasGas II loan agreements). These
agreements and the agreements that govern our existing
$100 million revolving credit facility contain, and we
expect the agreements governing our anticipated new
$137.5 million credit facility will contain, covenants and
other restrictions typical of debt financing secured by vessels,
including those that restrict the shipowning subsidiaries from:
|
|
|
|
|
incurring or guaranteeing indebtedness; |
|
|
|
changing ownership or structure, including mergers,
consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions; |
|
|
|
making dividends or distributions; |
|
|
|
making capital expenditures in excess of specified levels; |
|
|
|
making certain negative pledges and granting certain liens; |
|
|
|
selling, transferring, assigning or conveying assets; |
|
|
|
making certain loans and investments; and |
|
|
|
entering into a new line of business. |
In addition, the term loan for one of our LNG carriers, the
Catalunya Spirit, contains covenants that require the
maintenance of a minimum liquidity of 5.0 million Euros and
annual restricted cash deposits of 1.2 million Euro.
Our other LNG carrier term loan agreements (other than the
RasGas II loan agreements) currently contain covenants that
require the maintenance of cash collateral, unencumbered
liquidity and minimum tangible net worth. In addition, the
shipowning subsidiaries may not pay dividends or distributions
if we are in default under the term loan agreements.
The RasGas II term loan agreements we expect to assume
require Teekay Shipping Corporations guaranty and that
Teekay Shipping Corporation maintain at least
$100.0 million of free liquidity and that the amount of
Teekay Shipping Corporations consolidated free liquidity
(excluding that relating to us and our subsidiaries) plus any
undrawn revolving credit facilities not be less than 7.5% of
Teekay Shipping Corporations total consolidated debt
(excluding that of us and our subsidiaries).
We are currently in compliance with all of our financing
agreements and expect to remain in compliance. In the future,
some of the covenants and restrictions in our financing
agreements could restrict the use of cash generated by our
shipowning subsidiaries in a manner that could adversely affect
our ability to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our
units. However, we currently do not expect that our covenants
will have such an effect.
86
Contractual Obligations and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual
obligations as at June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
Less than 1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
More than 5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) | |
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt(1)
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Commitments under capital leases
(2)(3)
|
|
|
210.6 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
149.7 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
Newbuilding
installments(4)
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
obligation(5)
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Dollar-denominated obligations
|
|
|
351.2 |
|
|
|
58.2 |
|
|
|
242.5 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-Denominated
Obligations:(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt(7)
|
|
|
389.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
348.4 |
|
|
Commitments under capital leases
(2)(8)
|
|
|
441.9 |
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
177.1 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
111.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Euro-denominated obligations
|
|
|
831.1 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
194.3 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
|
|
|
459.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$ |
1182.3 |
|
|
$ |
155.4 |
|
|
$ |
436.8 |
|
|
$ |
87.9 |
|
|
$ |
502.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes interest payments that are based on LIBOR plus a margin. |
|
(2) |
Includes amounts we are required to pay to purchase the vessels
at the end of the lease terms. |
|
(3) |
Excludes payments for a Suezmax tanker (the Toledo
Spirit) on capital lease that was delivered in July 2005. |
|
(4) |
Represents remaining construction costs, excluding capitalized
interest, supervision and other miscellaneous costs, for the
Toledo Spirit that was delivered in July 2005. |
|
(5) |
Represents our estimate of the purchase price for Teekay
Shipping Corporations 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat,
excluding the assumption of approximately $327.7 million of
debt. Subsequent to June 30, 2005, Qatar Gas Transport
Company Ltd. (Nakilat) exercised its options to purchase a 30%
interest in the RasGas II vessels, which reduced our
estimated purchase commitment to approximately
$92.8 million. |
|
(6) |
Euro-denominated obligations are presented in U.S. Dollars
and have been converted using the prevailing exchange rate as of
June 30, 2005. |
|
(7) |
Excludes interest payments that are based on EURIBOR plus a
margin. |
|
(8) |
Existing restricted cash deposits, together with the interest
earned on the deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe
under the lease arrangements, including our obligation to
purchase the vessels at the end of the lease terms. |
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with GAAP, which require us to make estimates in the application
of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions,
judgments and opinions. Following is a discussion of the
accounting policies that involve a high degree of judgment and
the methods of their application. For a further description of
our material accounting policies, please read Note 1 to our
historical consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus.
We recognize revenues from time charters daily over the term of
the charter as the applicable vessel operates under the charter.
We do not recognize revenues during days that the vessel is
off-hire.
87
Prior to 2005, we generated a portion of our revenues from
voyage charters. Within the shipping industry, the two methods
used to account for voyage revenues and expenses from voyage
charters are the percentage of completion and the completed
voyage methods. Most shipping companies, including us, use the
percentage of completion method. For each method, voyages may be
calculated on either a load-to- load or discharge-to-discharge
basis. In other words, revenues are recognized ratably either
from the beginning of when product is loaded for one voyage to
when it is loaded for another voyage, or from when product is
discharged (unloaded) at the end of one voyage to when it
is discharged after the next voyage.
In applying the percentage of completion method, we believe
that, in most cases, the discharge-to-discharge basis of
calculating voyages more accurately reflects voyage results than
the load-to-load basis. At the time of cargo discharge, we
generally have information about the next load port and expected
discharge port, whereas at the time of loading we are normally
less certain what the next load port will be. We have used this
method of revenue recognition for all spot voyages. However, we
do not begin recognizing voyage revenue until a charter has been
agreed to by the customer and us, even if the vessel has
discharged its cargo and is sailing to the anticipated load port
on its next voyage.
|
|
|
Vessel Lives and Impairment |
The carrying value of each of our vessels represents its
original cost at the time of delivery or purchase less
depreciation or impairment charges. We depreciate our vessels on
a straight-line basis over a vessels estimated useful
life, less an estimated residual value. Depreciation is
calculated using an estimated useful life of 25 years for
Suezmax tankers and 35 years for LNG carriers, from the
date the vessel was originally delivered from the shipyard, or a
shorter period if regulations prevent us from operating the
vessels to 25 years or 35 years, respectively. In the
shipping industry, the use of a 25-year vessel life for Suezmax
tankers has become the prevailing standard. In addition, the use
of a 30- to 40-year vessel life for LNG carriers is typical.
However, the actual life of a vessel may be different, with a
shorter life potentially resulting in an impairment loss. We are
not aware of any regulatory changes or environmental liabilities
that we anticipate will have a material impact on the vessel
lives of our current fleet.
The carrying values of our vessels may not represent their fair
market value at any point in time since the market prices of
second-hand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in charter
rates and the cost of newbuildings. Both charter rates and
newbuilding costs tend to be cyclical in nature. We review
vessels and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. We measure the recoverability of an asset by
comparing its carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows
that the asset is expected to generate over its remaining useful
life. If we consider a vessel or equipment to be impaired, we
recognize impairment in an amount equal to the excess of the
carrying value of the asset over its fair market value.
Generally, we drydock each LNG carrier and Suezmax tanker every
five years. In addition, a shipping society classification
intermediate survey is performed on our LNG carriers between the
second and third year of the five-year drydocking period. We
capitalize a substantial portion of the costs we incur during
drydocking and for the survey and amortize those costs on a
straight-line basis from the completion of a drydocking or
intermediate survey to the estimated completion of the next
drydocking. We expense costs related to routine repairs and
maintenance incurred during drydocking that do not improve or
extend the useful lives of the assets. When significant
drydocking expenditures occur prior to the expiration of this
period, we expense the remaining unamortized balance of the
original drydocking cost and any unamortized intermediate survey
costs in the month of the subsequent drydocking.
We utilize derivative financial instruments to reduce interest
rate risks. We do not hold or issue derivative financial
instruments for trading purposes. Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (or
88
SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, which was amended in
June 2000 by SFAS No. 138 and in May 2003 by
SFAS No. 149, establishes accounting and reporting
standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. It
requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either
assets or liabilities in the statement of financial condition
and measure those instruments at fair value. Derivatives that
are not hedges or are not designated as hedges are adjusted to
fair value through income. If the derivative is a hedge,
depending upon the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair
value of the derivatives are either offset against the fair
value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments through income,
or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged
item is recognized in income. The ineffective portion of a
derivatives change in fair value is immediately recognized
into income.
|
|
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
We allocate the cost of acquired companies to the identifiable
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired, with
the remaining amount being classified as goodwill. Certain
intangible assets, such as time charter contracts, are being
amortized over time. Our future operating performance will be
affected by the amortization of intangible assets and potential
impairment charges related to goodwill. Accordingly, the
allocation of purchase price to intangible assets and goodwill
may significantly affect our future operating results. The
allocation of the purchase price of acquired companies to
intangible assets and goodwill requires management to make
significant estimates and assumptions, including estimates of
future cash flows expected to be generated by the acquired
assets and the appropriate discount rate to value these cash
flows.
Goodwill and indefinite lived assets are not amortized, but
reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if
impairment indicators arise. The process of evaluating the
potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets is highly
subjective and requires significant judgment at many points
during the analysis. The fair value of our reporting units was
estimated based on discounted expected future cash flows using a
weighted-average cost of capital rate. The estimates and
assumptions regarding expected cash flows and the discount rate
require considerable judgment and are based upon existing
contracts, historical experience, financial forecasts and
industry trends and conditions.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily
through our unhedged floating-rate borrowings. Significant
increases in interest rates could adversely affect our operating
margins, results of operations and our ability to service our
debt. We use interest rate swaps to reduce our exposure to
market risk from changes in interest rates. The principal
objective of these contracts is to minimize the risks and costs
associated with our floating-rate debt. As at June 30,
2005, our unhedged floating-rate borrowings totaled
$14.5 million. A 1% increase in the interest rates on that
amount would result in $0.2 million in additional annual
interest payments.
89
The table below provides information about our financial
instruments at June 30, 2005 that are sensitive to changes
in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents
principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates
by expected maturity dates. For interest rate swaps, the table
presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by
expected contractual maturity dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars, except percentages) | |
Long-Term Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated(2)
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
Euro-denominated(3)(4)
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
348.4 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Capital Lease
Obligations(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate
Obligations(6)
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
134.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
Average Interest
Rate(7)
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
Swaps:(3)(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract amount
(Euro-denominated)(4)
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
348.4 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
Average fixed pay
rate(3)
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for
our debt, including the margin we pay on our floating- rate
debt, as at June 30, 2005, and average fixed pay rate for
our swap agreements, as applicable. The average fixed pay rate
for our interest rate swaps excludes the margin we pay on our
floating-rate debt, which as of June 30, 2005, ranged from
1.1% to 1.3%. |
|
(2) |
Interest payments for U.S. Dollar-denominated debt are
based on LIBOR. |
|
(3) |
Interest payments on Euro-denominated debt and interest rate
swaps are based on EURIBOR. |
|
(4) |
Euro-denominated amounts have been converted to
U.S. Dollars using the prevailing exchange rate as of
June 30, 2005. |
|
(5) |
Excludes the capital lease obligations (present value of minimum
lease payments and purchase obligations) of 312.1 million
Euros ($377.6 million) on two of our LNG carriers. Under
the terms of these lease obligations, we are required to have on
deposit with financial institutions an amount of cash that,
together with the interest earned thereon, will fully fund the
amount owing under the capital lease obligations, including
purchase obligations. Consequently, we are not subject to
interest rate risk from these obligations. |
|
(6) |
The amount of capital lease obligations represents the present
value of minimum lease payments together with our applicable
purchase obligation. |
|
(7) |
The average interest rate is the weighted-average interest rate
implicit in the capital lease obligations at the inception of
the leases. |
|
(8) |
The average variable receive rate for our interest rate swaps is
set monthly at one-month EURIBOR or semi-annually at the
six-month EURIBOR. |
90
The following table sets forth further information about our
interest rate swap agreements, long-term debt and capital lease
obligations as at December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair | |
|
|
|
|
Contract | |
|
Value/Carrying | |
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-denominated
|
|
$ |
389.2 |
|
|
$ |
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Long-Term
Debt:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
Euro-denominated
|
|
$ |
389.2 |
|
|
$ |
(389.2 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated
|
|
$ |
328.5 |
|
|
$ |
(44.3 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
Euro-denominated
|
|
$ |
441.0 |
|
|
$ |
(90.6 |
) |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Long-Term
Debt:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated
|
|
$ |
343.4 |
|
|
$ |
(343.4 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
Euro-denominated
|
|
$ |
443.7 |
|
|
$ |
(443.7 |
) |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for
our debt and average fixed pay rate for our swap agreements. The
average fixed pay rate excludes the margin we pay on our
floating-rate debt. |
|
(2) |
Excludes fixed-rate capital lease obligations. |
Counterparties to these financial instruments expose us to
credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance; however,
counterparties to these agreements are major financial
institutions, and we consider the risk of loss due to
nonperformance to be minimal. We do not require collateral from
these institutions. We do not hold or issue interest rate swaps
for trading purposes.
We are exposed to the impact of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. Revenues generated from three of our time
charters are either partially or solely denominated in Euros. In
2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005, we earned
approximately 23.4 million Euros ($29.1 million) and
23.6 million Euros ($29.8 million), respectively, in
Euro-denominated revenues. Due to the delivery of two LNG
carriers during 2004, we expect these Euro-denominated revenues
to be approximately 47 million Euros ($61 million) per
year beginning in 2005. In addition, approximately 85% of our
vessel operating expenses are denominated in Euros, which is
primarily a function of the nationality of our crew. We expect a
similar proportion of our vessel operating expenses to continue
to be Euro-denominated in 2005. Historically, almost all of our
general and administrative expenses have been denominated in
Euros. However, we expect this to decrease somewhat during 2005,
as we will be incurring additional general and administrative
expenses that are denominated in both Canadian Dollars and
U.S. Dollars. As at June 30, 2005, we had
approximately $389.2 million of Euro-denominated debt. We
have not entered into any forward contracts or similar
arrangements to protect against the currency risk of foreign
currency-denominated revenues, expenses, monetary assets or
monetary liabilities. Please read
Overview Important Financial and
Operational Terms and Concepts Foreign Currency
Fluctuations.
91
INDUSTRY
We obtained the information in this prospectus about the
liquefied natural gas and seaborne oil transportation industries
from several independent outside sources, including the Energy
Information Administration (or EIA), an independent
statistical and analytical agency within the
U.S. Department of Energy; Clarkson Research Services
Limited (or CRS); the International Energy Agency
(or IEA), an autonomous energy forum for
26 industrial countries; and the U.S. Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (or FERC). Much of the most recent
government data available regarding the liquefied natural gas
industry is for 2002 and 2003.
Liquefied Natural Gas
Natural gas is the worlds fastest-growing primary energy
source. In 2002, the consumption of natural gas accounted for
approximately 23% of world energy consumption, and the EIA
expects global consumption to grow from 92 trillion cubic
feet (or Tcf) in 2002 to 128 Tcf in 2015,
representing a compounded annual growth rate of 2.6%. Economic
growth, the abundance of natural gas and its clean-burning
nature and the wide applicability of natural gas as a fuel
source have been driving this growth. Liquefied natural gas (or
LNG) provides a cost-effective means for transporting
natural gas overseas by supercooling it to a liquid form, which
reduces its volume to approximately 1/600th of its gaseous
state. Between 1993 and 2003, the annual amount of LNG shipped
internationally increased by a 7.0% compounded annual growth
rate, from 3.0 Tcf to 5.9 Tcf, as a result of
improvements in liquefaction and regasification technologies,
decreases in LNG shipping costs and increases in demand from
consuming regions located far from natural gas reserves. The IEA
expects the LNG shipping industry to continue to grow rapidly,
with worldwide LNG trade projected to increase by a 6.6%
compounded annual growth rate from 2002 to 2010, with annual
international LNG shipments reaching 8.8 Tcf in 2010.
Historically, LNG trade primarily centered around the major LNG
exporters of Indonesia, Malaysia and Algeria and the major LNG
importers of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. However, we expect
the Middle East and Africa to continue to be increasingly
important LNG exporting areas and Russia, with its vast natural
gas reserves, to become an LNG exporter. We also expect Europe
and North America to be among the major LNG importers. To meet
projected LNG shipping demand, LNG Shipping Solutions Ltd.
estimates that the world LNG carrier fleet must expand to
approximately 386 carriers by 2010 from its current size of
187 existing vessels and 123 vessels under order or
construction as of October 1, 2005.
|
|
|
Overview of Natural Gas Market |
Natural gas is used primarily to generate electricity and as a
heating source. Natural gas is abundant, with worldwide natural
gas reserves estimated at 6,040 Tcf, or 66 times the
volume of natural gas consumed in 2002.
Consumption of natural gas has been increasing steadily and is
projected to continue to rise due to a number of factors, such
as:
|
|
|
|
|
global economic growth and increasing energy demand; |
|
|
|
natural gas being a cleaner burning fuel than coal and oil,
contributing to an increase in the development of power plants
that run on natural gas; |
|
|
|
the wide applicability of natural gas as a fuel source, along
with consumer desires to diversify fuel sources; and |
|
|
|
market deregulation. |
92
The following chart shows historical and projected world natural
gas demand as of 2005.
World Natural Gas Demand
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, April 2005.
As consumption of natural gas continues to rise, there is a
growing disparity between the increase in forecasted consumption
by industrialized nations and their production levels. This
disparity will likely cause major consuming countries to rely on
imports for a greater portion of natural gas. Importers will
need to decide whether to import natural gas through a pipeline,
if possible, or by ship.
Much of the worlds natural gas is considered
stranded because it is located in regions distant
from consuming markets. A pipeline is usually the more
economical means of transporting natural gas from producing
regions if the consuming market can be served by pipeline and is
not too distant from the natural gas reserves. For some areas
that lack adequate pipelines such as Japan, South
Korea and Taiwan LNG may be the most economical or
only feasible form of natural gas that may be imported. For
other areas that have extensive existing pipelines
such as Europe and North America future demand for
natural gas is expected to exceed available reserves and
production capacity within the area served by the pipeline
network, which may result in additional LNG imports.
LNG shipping provides a cost-effective means for transporting
natural gas overseas. After natural gas is transported by
pipeline from production fields to a liquefaction facility, it
is supercooled to a temperature of approximately -260 degrees
Fahrenheit. This process reduces its volume to approximately
1/600th of its volume in a gaseous state. The reduced
volume facilitates economical storage and transportation by ship
over long distances, enabling countries with limited natural gas
reserves or limited access to long-distance transmission
pipelines to meet their demand for natural gas. The LNG is
transported overseas in specially built tanks on double-hulled
ships to a receiving terminal, where it is offloaded and stored
in heavily insulated tanks. In regasification facilities at the
receiving terminal, the LNG is returned to its gaseous state (or
regasified) and then shipped by pipeline for
distribution to natural gas customers.
93
The following diagram shows the flow of natural gas and LNG from
production to regasification.
LNG has existed since the early 1900s. LNG was first carried by
ship in 1959, and the international LNG trade began in the early
1960s, primarily involving the shipment of LNG from Algeria to
the United Kingdom.
In recent years, the demand for LNG has increased as natural gas
demand has continued to exceed production in mature gas
producing regions, as the cost of liquefying and regasifying has
declined due to improved technology, efficiency gains and more
competition, and as shipping costs have declined due primarily
to lower vessel construction costs. The following chart shows
the volume of LNG shipped internationally between 1993 and 2003.
World LNG Imports
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, 1994-2004.
LNG Exporters. A limited number of countries
currently export LNG. In 2003, 12 countries exported a
total of 5.9 Tcf of natural gas as LNG worldwide. In 1997,
there were nine countries that exported 4.0 Tcf of natural
gas as LNG.
94
Historically, the top three LNG exporters have been Indonesia,
Algeria and Malaysia. The following table shows the amount and
worldwide percentage of LNG exported by country or region in
2003 and the amount and percentage changes in LNG volume shipped
by each country from 2000 to 2003.
Major Exporters of LNG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
2003 Percentage |
|
|
|
Change in Country | |
|
Change in | |
|
|
of Worldwide |
|
|
|
Exports From | |
|
Exports From | |
Country |
|
Market |
|
2003 Exports | |
|
2000 to 2003 | |
|
2000 to 20003 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(billion cubic feet) | |
|
|
|
(billion cubic feet) | |
Indonesia
|
|
21% |
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Algeria
|
|
16 |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Malaysia
|
|
14 |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Qatar
|
|
11 |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
Other Middle East
|
|
10 |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Trinidad & Tobago
|
|
7 |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Nigeria
|
|
7 |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Australia
|
|
6 |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Brunei
|
|
6 |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
United States
|
|
1 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Libya
|
|
Less than 1% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, 2000-2004.
Export Capacity. A countrys ability to
export LNG depends on its access to natural gas reserves in
excess of its internal consumption and any exports via pipelines
and on its capacity to liquefy natural gas.
Natural Gas Reserves. World natural gas reserves
are estimated at 6,040 Tcf, or 66 times the volume of
natural gas consumed in 2002. In addition, through improved
exploratory technologies and drilling of new wells, additional
natural gas is discovered each year. However, much of the
natural gas is considered stranded because it is
located in regions distant from consuming markets.
The following chart shows the percentage of estimated natural
gas reserves by country as of January 2005.
World Natural Gas Reserves
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, April 2005.
95
Liquefaction Facilities. At the end of 2002,
almost 47% of global natural gas liquefaction capacity was
located in the Asia Pacific region, followed by 25% in Africa
and 21% in the Middle East. Global annual liquefaction capacity
is projected to expand 46% from 135 million metric tons in
2003 to 197 million metric tons by 2007, based on
facilities currently under construction. Significant new LNG
projects or expansion of existing projects are underway in
Egypt, Qatar, Nigeria, Australia, Trinidad and Tobago, and
Russia. The following chart highlights regional liquefaction
capacity as of October 2003 and expected capacity by 2007 as a
result of facilities then under construction. In addition, the
following chart shows facilities that the EIA reported as
proposed for development or in planning stages as of October
2003, but which had not then commenced construction. There is no
assurance that any of the proposed facilities will actually be
constructed, as a result of a failure to obtain financing, a
project sponsors decision not to proceed or otherwise.
Global LNG Liquefaction Facilities
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, December 2003.
While LNG exports primarily have been from the Asia Pacific
region, primarily Indonesia and Malaysia, the Middle East and
Russia control a substantial portion (over 65%) of the
worlds natural gas reserves. With gas-rich areas such as
these regions and countries constructing or expanding LNG
liquefaction facilities, we expect the predominant supply of LNG
will shift.
LNG Consumers
LNG Importers. Countries that consume major
quantities of natural gas but lack established transmission
pipelines or are located far from supplying markets may import
LNG as the most economical or only feasible means to obtain
natural gas. For instance, natural gas supplied 12% of
Japans energy needs in 2002 even though Japan has little
of its own supply and no currently feasible means of
establishing a pipeline from producing natural gas fields. In
addition, countries that have established pipelines but have
mature production fields or are not expected to have sufficient
production available to meet continued demand, such as the
United States, may import LNG as an alternative supply of
natural gas.
96
The following table shows the amount and percentage of LNG
imported by country in 2003 and the amount and percentage
changes in LNG volume consumed by each country from 2000 to 2003.
Major Importers of LNG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
2003 Percentage | |
|
|
|
Change in Country | |
|
Change in | |
|
|
of Worldwide | |
|
2003 | |
|
Imports From | |
|
Imports From | |
Country |
|
Market | |
|
Imports | |
|
2000 to 2003 | |
|
2000 to 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(billion cubic feet) | |
|
|
|
(billion cubic feet) | |
Japan
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
2,824 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
167 |
|
South Korea
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Spain
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
United States
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
France
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
Taiwan
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Italy
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Turkey
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Belgium
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Other Western Europe
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Other Americas
|
|
Less than 1% |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, 2000-2004.
Import Capacity. A countrys LNG import
capacity depends largely upon its regasification facilities and
pipeline infrastructure. In October 2003, 76% of the existing
global regasification capacity was located in the Asia Pacific
region, followed by 15% in Europe and 9% in North America. Most
countries with existing LNG import terminals are expanding their
import capacity either through construction of new facilities or
expansion of existing facilities. India is operating its first
two regasification facilities, China is constructing its first
facility and the United Kingdom is operating its first facility
since retiring facilities established in the early 1960s. Mexico
has approved three regasification projects. As of October 2003,
LNG import terminals were under construction in eight countries
and proposed in another 12 countries that would, if constructed,
expand existing global LNG import terminal capacity by a total
of approximately 50%.
97
The following chart highlights regional import capacity and
expected capacity as of October 2003 as a result of
regasification facilities then under construction. In addition,
the following chart shows facilities that the EIA reported as
proposed for development or in planning stages as of October
2003, but which had not then commenced construction. There is no
assurance that any of the proposed facilities will actually be
constructed, as a result of a failure to obtain financing or
regulatory approvals, a project sponsors decision not to
proceed or otherwise.
Global LNG Regasification Facilities
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, December 2003.
U.S. Import Capacity. The United States imported
10.6 million metric tons of LNG in 2003, compared to
4.8 million metric tons in 2002, the majority of which came
from Trinidad and Tobago in both years. There are currently four
LNG import terminals in the United States, with each of those
facilities either recently expanded or approved for expansion by
2008. In addition, in March 2005, Excelerate Energy, LLC
commenced operation of its Energy Bridge LNG regasification port
in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately 100 miles from the
Louisiana shoreline. Also as of October 2005, nine additional
terminals had been approved for construction in Freeport, Texas;
Corpus Christi, Texas (three terminals); Sabine, Texas;
Hackberry, Louisiana; Sabine, Louisiana; and at Gulf Landing and
Port Pelican, each off the coast of Louisiana. Over 25 new
terminals were also in the proposed or planning phases. In
addition, a terminal in the Gulf of Mexico has been approved for
construction. If constructed, these terminals will transport
natural gas by pipeline to the United States following
regasification of LNG received at the terminal.
98
LNG Trade Routes
Principal trade routes for LNG shipping include the South
Pacific Basin (Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia and Brunei) and
the Middle East to the North Pacific Basin (Japan, South Korea
and Taiwan), and North Africa and Nigeria to Europe and the
United States. The following map indicates the major LNG
shipping trade routes between LNG exporters and importers during
2002.
Note: Map indicates annual flows greater than
5 billion cubic feet for imports into the United States and
annual flows greater than 15 billion cubic feet for imports
into all other countries. Numbers in map above represent annual
LNG imports in billion cubic feet.
Source: U.S. Department of Energy.
We expect a significant increase in the amount of LNG shipped
from major gas producing regions such as the Middle East, Africa
and Russia to regions with insufficient gas production to meet
projected demand, such as Europe and North America.
LNG Carriers. LNG carriers transport LNG
internationally between liquefaction facilities and import
terminals. These double-hulled vessels include a sophisticated
containment system that holds and insulates the LNG
so it maintains its liquid form. LNG that evaporates during the
voyage and converts to natural gas (called boil-off) is
used as fuel to help propel the carrier.
Containment Systems. Since 1965, there have been six
different types of containment systems used on LNG carriers. The
two most prevalent systems are:
|
|
|
|
|
The Moss Rosenberg spherical system, which was designed
in the 1970s and is used by nearly half of the current LNG
fleet. In this system, multiple self-supporting, spherical tanks
are built independent of the carrier and arranged inside its
hull. |
|
|
|
The Gaz Transport membrane system, which is built inside
the carrier and consists of insulation between thin primary and
secondary barriers. The membrane containment system makes up the
remainder of the current fleet and dominates the orderbook. The
predominant types of membrane systems are Gaz Transports
NO96 and the Technigaz Mark III
design. Both systems are built |
99
|
|
|
|
|
inside the carrier and consist of insulation between thin
primary and secondary barriers. The membrane is designed to
accommodate thermal expansion and contraction without
overstressing the membrane. |
Illustrations of these systems are included below:
|
|
|
Moss Rosenberg System |
|
Gaz Transport System |
|
|
|
Most new vessels, including all of our vessels, are being built
with membrane systems, such as the Gaz Transport system. This
trend is primarily a result of the increased shipyard capacity
available for membrane ships and the fact that canal fees and
related costs associated with passage through the Suez Canal
(required for many long-haul trade routes) are lower for
carriers with membrane systems. In addition, the membrane system
provides a large, flat deck with consequent ease of maintenance
and operational efficiency since the spheres on the Moss
Rosenberg systems create more wind resistance.
Carrying Capacity. The cargo capacity of an LNG carrier
is measured in cubic meters. Although the average capacity of
most of the carriers in the existing world fleet is
approximately 118,400 cubic meters, the average capacity for
newbuildings on order as of October 1, 2005 was
approximately 153,700 cubic meters, and shipyards have
contracted to build vessels with capacities of 200,000 or more
cubic meters.
Expected Lifespan. New LNG carriers are generally
expected to have a lifespan of approximately 40 years.
Unlike the oil tanker industry, there currently are no
regulations that require the phase-out from trading of LNG
carriers after they reach a certain age.
LNG Fleet. As of October 1, 2005, the worldwide LNG
fleet included 187 vessels, with an average age of
approximately 13.4 years.
Newbuildings. As of October 1, 2005, there
were 123 additional LNG carriers under construction or order for
delivery through 2010, as detailed in the following table.
LNG Orderbook and Delivery Schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery Year |
|
Number of Vessels | |
|
Total Vessel Capacity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(cubic meters) | |
2005
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,139,500 |
|
2006
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
3,697,968 |
|
2007
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
5,401,200 |
|
2008 and after
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
8,659,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
18,898,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: CRS, October 1, 2005.
To meet projected LNG shipping demand, LNG Shipping Solutions
Ltd. estimates that the world LNG fleet must expand to
approximately 386 vessels by 2010.
LNG Shipyards. Only twelve shipyards in the world
currently build LNG vessels, five of which are located in Japan,
four in South Korea and one each in China, France and Spain.
Industry analysts generally believe that existing newbuilding
orders will keep most major shipyards at full capacity until the
end of 2008, with the average lead time for delivery of a
newbuilding being approximately three years from the time of the
order. The South Korean shipyards, which are building
approximately 85% of the LNG newbuildings on order, are
expanding existing capacity to capture additional projected
demand.
100
LNG Carrier Prices. Shipbuilding prices have been
cyclical due to factors such as available shipyard capacity,
demand for newbuildings, currency exchange rates, the cost of
steel and other vessel materials and general economic
conditions. Prices for new LNG carriers fell significantly from
approximately $263 million in 1992 for a 125,000 cubic
meter carrier to approximately $204 million in 2005 for a
147,000 cubic meter carrier as a result of expansion in
shipbuilding capacity, price competition between shipyards and
economies of scale. However, rising steel and equipment costs,
along with greater demand for newbuildings, has led to an
increase in prices since late 2003. Increasing LNG carrier
demand may contribute to further price increases. The following
chart illustrates changes in the average cost to build a new LNG
carrier since 1992 based on sizes generally considered average
or standard for LNG carriers within the respective years.
LNG Newbuilding Prices
Source: CRS, October 1, 2005.
Competition. The two main types of LNG fleet
operators that provide international LNG transportation services
are private and state-controlled energy and utilities companies
that generally operate captive fleets, and independent ship
owners and operators. Many major energy companies compete
directly with independent owners by transporting LNG for third
parties in addition to their own LNG. Given the complex,
long-term nature of LNG projects, major energy companies
historically have transported LNG through their captive fleets.
However, independent fleet operators recently have been winning
an increasing percentage of charters for new or expanded LNG
projects as major energy companies continue to divest non-core
businesses. As of October 1, 2005, independent owners owned
approximately 48% of the world LNG fleet, including
approximately 27% owned by independent Japanese and South Korean
owners. Approximately 65% of newbuilding orders are from
independent owners. We believe that the increasing ownership of
the world LNG fleet by independent owners is attributable in
part to the desire of some major energy companies to limit their
commitment to the transportation business, which is non-core to
their operations, and to the cost of financing of new LNG
carriers in addition to the high construction costs of
liquefaction and regasification facilities.
101
The following chart lists the top fifteen LNG carrier owners as
of October 1, 2005.
LNG Carrier Owners
Source: CRS, October 1, 2005.
|
|
* |
Includes four existing LNG carriers owned by us, the three
RasGas II newbuilding carriers we have agreed to acquire
from Teekay Shipping Corporation, and six additional newbuilding
carriers that Teekay Shipping Corporation is having constructed
and will offer to us. |
Operators of LNG carriers compete primarily based on:
|
|
|
|
|
shipping industry relationships and reputation for customer
service and safety; |
|
|
|
LNG shipping experience and quality of ship operations
(including cost effectiveness); |
|
|
|
quality and experience of seafaring crew; |
|
|
|
the ability to finance LNG carriers at competitive rates and
financial stability generally; |
|
|
|
relationships with shipyards and the ability to get suitable
berths; |
|
|
|
construction management experience, including the ability to
obtain on-time delivery of new vessels according to customer
specifications; |
|
|
|
willingness to accept operational risk pursuant to the charter
contract, such as allowing termination of the charter for force
majeure events; and |
|
|
|
competitiveness of bids in terms of overall price. |
In addition, some charterers, including state-controlled
entities and Japanese energy and utility companies, have in the
past shown a preference for owners and operators of the same
nationality.
LNG Shipping Contracts. LNG carriers are usually
hired (or chartered) to carry LNG pursuant to time
charter contracts, where a vessel is hired for a fixed period of
time, usually between 20 and 25 years,
102
and the charter rate is payable to the owner on a monthly basis.
LNG shipping historically has been transacted with these
long-term, fixed-rate time charter contracts because:
|
|
|
|
|
LNG projects are expensive and typically involve an integrated
chain of dedicated facilities and cooperative activities;
accordingly, the overall success of an LNG project depends
heavily on long-range planning and coordination of project
activities, including marine transportation; |
|
|
|
LNG carriers are expensive to build, so the cash-flow from
long-term, fixed-rate charters supports the vessel financing; |
|
|
|
most end users of LNG are utility companies, power stations and
petrochemical producers that depend on reliable and
uninterrupted delivery of LNG; and |
|
|
|
the limited size of the world LNG fleet and number of
independent operators historically has not been conducive to
development of a spot market for LNG transportation services. |
We define LNG charters for a period of less than five years as
short-term, LNG charters for a period of between five and
10 years as medium term, and LNG charters of more than
10 years as long-term.
Although most shipping requirements for new LNG projects
continue to be provided on a long-term basis, spot voyages
(typically consisting of a single voyage) and short-term time
charters of less than 12 months duration grew from less
than 2% of the market in the late 1990s to almost 11% in 2003.
Growth in the short-term LNG market has been driven primarily by:
|
|
|
|
|
increases in new LNG production capacity that is not fully
committed to a particular importer; |
|
|
|
increases in seasonal demand for LNG due to, for example,
reliance on natural gas as a commercial and residential heating
source or for power generation during times of peak electricity
usage; |
|
|
|
the increasing availability of LNG carriers not committed to a
particular project, either as a result of the termination of
existing time charters without a replacement charter or the
building of new carriers on a speculative basis; |
|
|
|
increased emphasis on delivery flexibility by importers and
related increased charter contract flexibility; and |
|
|
|
unforeseen disruptions to production capacity in some exporting
countries. |
Shipping Rates. Although LNG and natural gas
prices are generally benchmarked to competing fuels, LNG
shipping rates are not tied to a particular market, as is the
case with crude oil tanker rates. The cost of LNG depends on the
cost of natural gas and LNG production, the cost of liquefaction
and regasification facilities and the cost to ship the LNG.
Shipping the LNG typically accounts for approximately 10% to 30%
of its cost, primarily due to the cost of building an LNG
carrier. Long-term LNG charter rates typically are determined
based on the price of the carrier and its financing and
operating costs. Average daily rates at the end of 2003 were
generally between $55,000 and $65,000, with a range of $27,000
to $150,000, according to the EIA.
Safety and Security. LNG shipping generally has
been safe relative to other forms of commercial marine
transportation. In the past 40 years, there has been no
significant accident or cargo spillage involving an LNG carrier,
even though over 33,000 LNG voyages have been made during that
time.
LNG is non-toxic and non-explosive in its liquid state. LNG only
becomes explosive, or flammable, when heated and vaporized, and
then only when in a confined space within a narrow range of
concentrations in the air (5% to 15%). Greater concentrations of
natural gas do not contain enough oxygen to sustain a flame,
while lesser concentrations of natural gas contain enough oxygen
to dilute the natural gas too much for it to ignite. The risks
and hazards from an LNG spill will vary depending on the size of
the spill, environmental conditions and the site at which the
spill occurs. Hazards can include freeze burns to the
ships crew and people nearby and damage to the LNG carrier
from contact with LNG. Once a spill occurs, LNG vaporizes and
subsequent ignition of the vapor cloud could cause fires and
overpressures
103
that could injure people or cause damage to the LNG
carriers structure, other LNG carriers or nearby
structures.
The risk of accidental LNG spills, which could result from such
events as groundings of carriers or collisions, is low and
generally manageable with current safety policies and practices.
However, given the increasing number and frequency of LNG
carrier deliveries to ports across the United States, concerns
about the potential for an accidental spill or release of LNG
have increased. In addition, since the September 11, 2001
and other terrorist attacks, concerns have increased over the
impact an attack on targets such as LNG carriers could have on
public safety and property.
There have been some safety-related incidents involving LNG
liquefaction and regasification facilities, including explosions
in Algeria in 2004 caused by defective steam boilers. As LNG
infrastructure is expanded, some communities in the United
States are protesting the building of new regasification
facilities based on safety and security concerns, including the
possibility that LNG terminals will be targets of terrorism.
Regulations may be adopted to enhance risk assessment and
security requirements for LNG carriers and facilities.
Energy Bridge. Regasification technology under
development could minimize safety and security concerns
associated with the importation of LNG. In March 2005,
Excelerate Energy, LLC commenced operation of its Energy Bridge
LNG regasification port in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately
100 miles from the Louisiana shoreline. The Energy Bridge
is the worlds first offshore LNG regasification terminal.
The relatively untested technology requires special LNG vessels
that facilitate on-board regasification. Excelerate delivers the
resulting natural gas through an underwater pipeline into the
U.S. pipeline network. If the Energy Bridge is commercially
successful, other energy companies may develop similar offshore
regasification terminals.
Regulation. In the United States, regasification
facilities must conform to standards set by the
U.S. Department of Transportation, the U.S. Coast
Guard, the FERC, the National Fire Protection Association, state
utility commissions, port authorities and other state and local
agencies. The U.S. Department of Transportation and the
Coast Guard security measures for land-based and marine LNG
terminals require security patrols, protective enclosures,
lighting, monitoring equipment and alternative power sources.
Coast Guard regulations also prohibit other ships from
approaching LNG carriers while traveling within the Coast
Guards jurisdiction or docked at U.S. terminals.
Regasification terminals to be located in the United States
require approval by the FERC for onshore facilities and the
U.S. Coast Guard for offshore facilities, in addition to
other federal agency and applicable state or local regulatory
approvals, including environmental permits, the obtaining of
which generally takes at least 12 to 18 months from filing
an application. If there is significant public opposition to a
project, the approval process may take much longer. Even prior
to the filing of an application, the approval process includes,
among other things, environmental assessments and public input
and a pre-filing process to identify potential environmental,
permitting and land use issues. Members of the public who
formally intervene in the approval process may challenge final
approval.
Crude Oil Shipping Suezmax Tankers
Oil has been the worlds primary energy source for a number
of decades. In 2002, the consumption of oil accounted for
approximately 40% of world energy consumption, and the EIA
expects daily global consumption to increase from an average of
78 million barrels in 2002 to approximately
103 million barrels in 2015. Although the consumption of
natural gas has increased relative to oil, daily oil demand has
grown from an average of approximately 76 million barrels
to approximately 82 million barrels from 1999 to 2004,
primarily as a result of global economic growth. Oil reserves
remain abundant and, like natural gas, tend to be located in
regions far from major consuming countries, which contributes to
oil tanker demand.
104
Seaborne crude oil transportation is a mature industry. The two
main types of oil tanker operators are major oil companies
(including state-owned companies) that generally operate captive
fleets, and independent operators that charter out their vessels
for voyage or time-charter use. Most conventional oil tankers
controlled by independent fleet operators are hired for one or a
few voyages at a time at fluctuating market rates based on the
existing tanker supply and demand. These charter rates are
extremely sensitive to this balance of supply and demand, and
small changes in tanker utilization have historically led to
relatively large short-term rate changes. Long-term, fixed-rate
charters for crude oil transportation, such as those applicable
to our Suezmax tanker fleet, are less typical in the industry.
As used in this discussion, conventional oil tankers
exclude those vessels that can carry dry bulk and ore, tankers
that currently are used for storage purposes and shuttle tankers
that are designed to transport oil from offshore production
platforms to onshore storage and refinery facilities.
The majority of crude oil tankers range in size from
approximately 80,000 to approximately 320,000 deadweight tonnes
(or dwt). Suezmax tankers are the mid-size of the various
primary oil tanker types, typically sized from 120,000 to
200,000 dwt. According to CRS, as of October 1, 2005, the
world tanker fleet included 274 conventional Suezmax
vessels, representing approximately 12% of worldwide oil tanker
capacity, excluding tankers under 10,000 dwt. Most Suezmax
tankers trade in the Atlantic region, which accounts for
approximately 80% of the Suezmax market.
Oil tanker demand is a function of several factors, including
the locations of oil production, refining and consumption and
world oil demand and supply. Tanker demand is based on the
amount of crude oil transported in tankers and the distance over
which the oil is transported.
Transportation Distance. The distance over which
oil is transported is determined by seaborne trading and
distribution patterns, which are principally influenced by the
relative advantages of the various sources of production and
locations of consumption. Seaborne trading patterns are also
periodically influenced by geopolitical events, such as wars,
hostilities and trade embargoes that divert tankers from normal
trading patterns, as well as by inter-regional oil trading
activity created by oil supply and demand imbalances.
Traditionally, the level of exports from the Middle East has had
a strong effect on the tanker market as a whole due to the
relatively long distance between this supply source and typical
discharge points.
Oil Demand. The overall increase in world oil
demand since 1999 has positively affected the market for
seaborne oil transportation. Demand for oil is driven by the
level of economic activity and industrial production. The
following table indicates the geographic breakdown of world oil
demand during the past five years and estimated demand for 2005
and 2006.
World Oil Demand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005E | |
|
2006E | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(millions of barrels per day) | |
OECD* North America Demand
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
OECD Europe Demand
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
OECD Pacific Demand
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total OECD Demand
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
Total Non-OECD Demand
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Demand
|
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
77.7 |
|
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
85.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: IEA, November 2005.
|
|
* |
OECD indicates countries that are members of the international
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. |
105
Oil Supply. The worlds oil supply is
concentrated in the Middle East, followed by North America and
the former Soviet Union. As of January 2005, the Middle East
controlled approximately 60% of the worlds proven oil
reserves. For September 2005, the Middle East accounted for
approximately 30% of global oil production. The size of its
reserves, together with its currently underutilized production
capacity, suggests that the Middle East may supply the largest
percentage of any growth in world oil consumption. In addition,
the IEA estimates growth in non-OPEC oil production for 2005
from the former Soviet Union, Africa and Latin America,
locations that are generally well-suited for Suezmax tanker
transportation, which could favorably affect demand for Suezmax
tankers.
The supply of oil tankers is a function of new vessel
deliveries, vessel scrapping and the conversion or loss of
tonnage.
The level of newbuilding orders is a function primarily of
newbuilding prices in relation to current and prospective
charter market conditions. Available shipyard capacity for
newbuildings is another factor that affects tanker supply. Most
major shipyards have sold their newbuilding berths through 2007,
leaving little available capacity for 2008. Rising steel and
equipment costs, along with competition for newbuilding berths
from shipping sectors other than oil transportation, led to an
increase in newbuilding contract prices during 2004.
At any point in time, the level of scrapping activity is a
function primarily of scrapping prices in relation to current
and prospective charter market conditions and operating, repair
and survey costs. Industry regulations also affect scrapping
levels. For example, the United Nations International
Maritime Organization (or IMO) amended regulations in
2003 to accelerate the phase-out of certain pre-1982 single-hull
vessels to 2005 from 2007. IMO regulations are expected to cause
over 30% of the existing world tanker fleet to be phased out by
2015. In addition to IMO regulation, the United States Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 requires that all oil tankers entering
U.S. waterways be exclusively double-hulled by 2015.
Aging vessels typically require substantial repairs and
maintenance to conform to industry standards, including repairs
made in connection with special surveys, which involve periodic,
thorough inspections. These surveys are part of a certification
process of classification societies, and a vessel must be
certified as in-class to continue to trade.
Insurance companies and customers rely to some degree on the
survey and classification regime to provide reasonable assurance
of a vessels seaworthiness. Because the cost of
maintaining a vessel in-class rises substantially as the age of
the vessel increases, vessel owners often conclude that it is
more economical to scrap an older vessel than to upgrade it to
maintain its in-class certification. In addition, the economics
of operating older vessels are adversely affected by customer
demand for the safety and reliability associated with more
modern vessels, coupled with the higher charter rates and
operating cost efficiencies that are typically available to
newer vessels.
|
|
|
Types of Crude Oil Tankers |
The world crude oil tanker fleet is generally divided into the
following types of tankers based on deadweight tonnes:
|
|
|
|
|
Ultra Large Crude Carriers (or ULCCs), of 320,000 dwt or
more; |
|
|
|
Very Large Crude Carriers (or VLCCs), of 200,000 to
320,000 dwt; |
|
|
|
Suezmax tankers of 120,000 to 200,000 dwt; |
|
|
|
Aframax tankers of 80,000 to 120,000 dwt; and |
|
|
|
Smaller tankers (such as Panamax and Handysize) of less than
80,000 dwt. |
To benefit from economies of scale, tanker charterers
transporting crude oil typically charter the largest tanker
available in the market that is appropriate for the intended
journey. Factors that charterers
106
consider include the charterers preference to use larger
tankers for longer-haul trades and smaller tankers for medium to
short-haul trades, port and canal size restrictions and cargo
sizes.
Suezmax tankers engage in, and realize economies of scale on,
long-haul crude oil routes as well as medium-haul crude oil
routes, such as from West Africa and the North Sea to the east
coast of the United States.
Expected Lifespan. New Suezmax tankers are
generally expected to have a lifespan of approximately 25 to
30 years, based on estimated hull fatigue life. However,
U.S. and international regulations require the earlier phase-out
of existing vessels that are not double-hulled, regardless of
their expected lifespan. Approximately 76% of the current world
conventional Suezmax fleet is double-hulled. All of our Suezmax
tankers under long-term charter are double-hulled.
Suezmax Fleet. As of October 1, 2005, the
world Suezmax tanker fleet consisted of 341 vessels, of
which 274 vessels were conventional tankers with an average
age of 8.6 years. The following table illustrates the age
of the conventional Suezmax world fleet.
Conventional Suezmax Fleet Age Profile
Source: CRS, October 1, 2005.
Newbuildings. As of October 1, 2005, there
were 64 conventional Suezmax newbuildings on order for delivery
until 2008. Delivery of a vessel typically occurs within three
years after ordering. Shipyards worldwide construct Suezmax
tankers, with only a limited number that also construct LNG
carriers and other size oil tankers.
The world Suezmax fleet primarily consists of captive fleets of
major oil companies, including state-owned companies, and
independent tanker fleets. Independent owners control the
majority of the conventional Suezmax fleet, with four major oil
companies owning Suezmax vessels. The following table shows the
largest operators of conventional Suezmax tankers as of
October 1, 2005, ranked by number of ships. These six
Suezmax operators control approximately 36% of the existing
conventional Suezmax fleet.
107
Major Suezmax Conventional Tanker
Operators(1)
Source: CRS, October 1, 2005.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Conventional oil tankers exclude those vessels that can carry
dry bulk and ore, tankers that currently are used for storage
purposes and shuttle tankers that are designed to transport oil
from offshore production platforms to onshore storage and
refinery facilities. |
|
|
(2) |
OMI Corporation and Frontline Ltd. have a Suezmax cooperation
agreement through Alliance Chartering. Other owners are also
participating. |
|
|
(3) |
Data for Teekay Shipping Corporation includes our Suezmax
tankers. |
Competition in the Suezmax tanker market is intense and affected
by the availability and suitability of other size vessels that
compete in the Suezmax tanker market. ULCCs, VLCCs, Aframax-size
vessels and Panamax-size vessels all can compete for many of the
same charters for which Suezmax tankers compete. Competition in
this market is primarily based on:
|
|
|
|
|
price; |
|
|
|
location (for single-voyage or short-term charters); |
|
|
|
the size, age, condition and acceptability of the vessel; |
|
|
|
oil tanker shipping experience and quality of ship
operations; and |
|
|
|
the size of an operating fleet, with larger fleets allowing for
greater vessel substitution, availability and customer service. |
Suezmax tankers are particularly well-suited for medium-haul
crude oil routes, such as from West Africa and the North Sea to
the east coast of the United States.
Because all of the vessels in our Suezmax fleet are subject to
long-term, fixed-rate charters, we do not expect to compete for
deployment of our Suezmax vessels until the first charter is
scheduled to end in 2015.
Suezmax voyages are predominantly conducted on short-term
contracts and spot pricing. Spot charters involve the chartering
of a specific vessel for one or a few voyages. We define oil
tanker charters for a period of less than two years as
short-term, charters for a period of between two and five years
as medium-term and oil tanker charters for a period of more than
five years as long-term.
108
BUSINESS
Overview
We are an international provider of liquefied natural gas (or
LNG) and crude oil marine transportation services. We
were formed by Teekay Shipping Corporation, the worlds
largest owner and operator of medium-sized crude oil tankers, to
expand its operations in the LNG shipping sector. Our growth
strategy focuses on expanding our fleet of LNG carriers under
long-term, fixed-rate charters. We view our Suezmax tanker fleet
primarily as a source of stable cash flow as we expand our LNG
operations. We seek to leverage the expertise, relationships and
reputation of Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates in
pursuing significant growth opportunities in the LNG shipping
sector. Teekay Shipping Corporation, which owns and controls our
general partner, will own a 66.9% limited partner interest in us
upon the closing of this offering.
Our fleet currently consists of four LNG carriers and five
Suezmax-class crude oil tankers, all of which are double-hulled.
Our fleet is young, with an average age of approximately two
years for our LNG carriers and approximately three years for our
existing Suezmax tankers, compared to world averages of
13.4 years and 8.6 years, respectively, as of
October 1, 2005.
These vessels operate under long-term, fixed-rate time charters
with major energy and utility companies. The average remaining
term for these charters is approximately 20 years for our
LNG carriers and approximately 17 years for our Suezmax
tankers, subject, in certain circumstances, to termination or
vessel purchase rights.
Our existing LNG fleet has 557,000 cubic meters of capacity,
which will increase to approximately 1.0 million cubic
meters by the end of 2007 upon delivery of three LNG newbuilding
carriers described below. The capacity of our existing Suezmax
tanker fleet is 797,500 deadweight tonnes.
We have agreed to purchase from Teekay Shipping Corporation,
upon the closing of this offering, three double-hulled Suezmax
crude oil tankers (the African Spirit, the Asian
Spirit and the European Spirit) for an aggregate
purchase price of $180 million. These vessels have an
average age of two years and operate pursuant to fixed-rate time
charters to a subsidiary of ConocoPhillips, an integrated,
international energy company. Each charter has a remaining
scheduled term of approximately 10 years, subject to
termination and vessel sale and purchase rights. In addition,
ConocoPhillips has the option to extend the time charters up to
an additional six years. If ConocoPhillips declines to exercise
this option, we have granted Teekay Shipping Corporation the
right to charter the vessels for up to six years under the same
pricing terms and conditions as those in the time charters with
ConocoPhillips. While the vessels are under charter to
ConocoPhillips, Teekay Shipping Corporation will manage their
operation pursuant to existing ship management agreements.
We also have agreed to acquire from Teekay Shipping Corporation
its 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat Corporation (or Teekay
Nakilat), which owns three 151,700 cubic meter double-hulled
LNG newbuilding carriers. We expect to take delivery of these
LNG newbuildings during the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first
half of 2007. Upon their deliveries, the vessels will provide
transportation services under 20-year, fixed-rate time charters
to Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II) (or
RasGas II), a joint venture between Qatar Petroleum
and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil
Corporation, established for the purpose of expanding LNG
production in Qatar. Qatar Gas Transport Company Ltd. (Nakilat)
owns the remaining 30% of Teekay Nakilat. Please read
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase RasGas II
Interest.
Our original fleet was established by Naviera F. Tapias S.A. (or
Tapias), a private Spanish company founded in 1991 to
ship crude oil. Tapias began shipping LNG with the acquisition
of its first LNG carrier in 2002. Teekay Shipping Corporation
acquired Tapias in April 2004 and changed its name to Teekay
Shipping Spain S.L. (or Teekay Spain). As part of the
acquisition, Teekay Spain retained Tapiass senior
management, including its chief executive officer, and other
personnel, who continue to manage the day-to-day operations of
Teekay Spain with input on strategic decisions from our general
partner. Teekay
109
Spain also obtains strategic consulting, advisory, ship
management, technical and administrative services from
affiliates of Teekay Shipping Corporation.
On November 3, 2004, we were formed as a wholly owned
subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation in connection with our
initial public offering. Upon the closing of that offering on
May 10, 2005, we acquired Teekay Spain, among other assets,
and began operating as a publicly traded limited partnership.
Teekay Shipping Corporation, which owns and controls our general
partner, will own a 66.9% limited partner interest in us upon
the closing of this offering.
We believe that conducting our operations through a publicly
traded limited partnership provides us access to the public
equity and debt capital markets, a lower cost of capital for
expansion and acquisitions, and an enhanced ability to use our
equity securities as consideration in future acquisitions.
Business Opportunities
We believe the following industry dynamics create a favorable
environment in which to expand our LNG business:
|
|
|
|
|
Strong increase in demand for LNG vessels. Natural
gas represented approximately 23% of world energy consumption in
2002 and is the fastest growing primary energy source according
to the U.S. Department of Energy. Between 1993 and 2003,
the annual amount of LNG shipped internationally increased from
3.0 trillion cubic feet (or Tcf) to 5.9 Tcf, as a result
of improvements in liquefaction and regasification technologies,
decreases in LNG shipping costs and increases in demand from
consuming regions located far from natural gas reserves. Due to
the vast distances between many areas of natural gas production
and consumption and the related cost, regulatory and geological
challenges of pipeline construction, seaborne transportation of
LNG provides either the only or the most cost-effective means of
transporting natural gas to many consuming regions. As of
October 1, 2005, the world LNG carrier fleet consisted of
187 existing vessels and 123 vessels under order or
construction. To meet projected LNG shipping demand, LNG
Shipping Solutions Ltd. estimates that the worldwide LNG fleet
must expand to approximately 386 vessels by 2010. |
|
|
|
Globalization of LNG trade routes. We believe more
opportunities to transport LNG are developing outside
traditional trade routes. Historically, LNG trade primarily
centered around the major LNG exporters of Indonesia, Malaysia
and Algeria and the major LNG importers of Japan, South Korea
and Taiwan. However, we expect the Middle East and Africa to
continue to be increasingly important LNG exporting areas and
Russia, with its vast natural gas reserves, to become an LNG
exporter. We also expect Europe and North America to be among
the major LNG importers. We believe that the increase in the
number and scope of LNG trade routes will result in greater
accessibility to LNG and lead to increased LNG demand. |
|
|
|
Increasing ownership of world LNG carrier fleet by
independent owners. Until recently, major private and
state-owned energy companies owned most of the world LNG carrier
fleet. However, companies such as us that are independent of
major energy companies now own about 45% of the existing LNG
fleet, and independent owners have placed approximately 65% of
existing LNG newbuilding orders. We believe that the increasing
ownership of the world LNG fleet by independent owners is
attributable in part to the desire of some major energy
companies to limit their commitment to: |
|
|
|
|
|
the marine transportation business, which is non-core to their
operations; and |
|
|
|
the cost of financing of new LNG carriers in addition to the
high construction costs of LNG facilities. |
110
|
|
|
|
|
Stringent customer standards favor high-quality
operators. Major energy companies are highly selective
in their choice of LNG transportation partners due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
their need for reliable, uninterrupted access to LNG
transportation; |
|
|
|
the heightened reliance on the LNG transportation partner once
selected, resulting from the lack of commercially viable
transportation alternatives; and |
|
|
|
public perception of LNG projects, which magnifies customer
sensitivity to hiring energy transportation providers with
strong reputations for maintaining high safety, environmental
and quality standards. |
|
|
|
These factors have contributed to increasingly stringent
pre-qualification operational and financial standards that LNG
vessel operators must meet prior to bidding on nearly all
significant LNG transportation contracts. We believe that these
rigorous and comprehensive standards will increase our ability
relative to less qualified or experienced operators to compete
effectively for new LNG contracts. |
Business Strategies
Our primary business objective is to increase distributable cash
flow per unit by executing the following strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquire new LNG carriers built to project specifications
after long-term, fixed-rate time charters have been awarded for
an LNG project. Our LNG carriers (including the three
RasGas II vessels) were built or will be built to customer
specifications included in the related long-term, fixed-rate
time charters for the vessels. We intend to continue our
practice of acquiring LNG carriers as needed for approved
projects only after the long-term, fixed-rate time charters for
the projects have been awarded, rather than ordering vessels on
a speculative basis. We believe this approach is preferable to
speculative newbuilding because it: |
|
|
|
|
|
eliminates the risk of incremental or duplicative expenditures
to alter our LNG carriers to meet customer specifications; |
|
|
|
facilitates the financing of new LNG carriers based on their
anticipated future revenues; and |
|
|
|
ensures that new vessels will be employed upon acquisition,
which should generate more stable cash flow. |
|
|
|
|
|
Expand our LNG operations globally. We seek to
capitalize on opportunities emerging from the global expansion
of the LNG sector by selectively targeting: |
|
|
|
|
|
long-term, fixed-rate time charters wherever significant LNG
liquefaction and regasification facilities are being built or
expanded; |
|
|
|
joint ventures and partnerships with companies that may provide
increased access to opportunities in attractive LNG importing
and exporting geographic regions; and |
|
|
|
strategic vessel and business acquisitions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Provide superior customer service by maintaining high
reliability, safety, environmental and quality
standards. LNG project operators seek LNG transportation
partners that have a reputation for high reliability, safety,
environmental and quality standards. We seek to leverage our own
and Teekay Shipping Corporations operational expertise to
create a sustainable competitive advantage with consistent
delivery of superior customer service by our: |
|
|
|
|
|
responsiveness, reliability, professionalism and integrity; |
|
|
|
adoption of responsible environmental practices and strict
adherence to environmental regulations; |
111
|
|
|
|
|
dedication to safe operations, commencing with our care in
selecting and training our sea and office personnel; and |
|
|
|
use of customer feedback and industry and internal performance
measures to drive continuous improvements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Manage our Suezmax tanker fleet to provide stable cash
flows. The remaining terms for our existing long-term
Suezmax tanker charters, including those we will acquire from
Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of this offering,
are 10 to 20 years. We believe the fixed-rate time charters
for our oil tanker fleet provide us stable cash flows during
their terms and a source of funding for expanding our LNG
operations. Depending on prevailing market conditions during and
at the end of each existing charter, we may seek to extend the
charter, enter into a new charter, operate the vessel on the
spot market or sell the vessel, in order to maximize returns on
our Suezmax fleet while managing residual risk. |
Competitive Strengths
We believe that we are well positioned to execute our business
strategies successfully because of the following competitive
strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
We have a strategic platform from which to expand our
presence in the rapidly growing LNG marine transportation
sector. We currently operate four LNG carriers and are
scheduled to receive deliveries of three LNG newbuildings
beginning in the fourth quarter of 2006 through the first half
of 2007. Our LNG fleet, combined with our existing relationships
with leading energy and utility companies in Spain, a
significant importer of LNG, and our new relationship, through
RasGas II, to the important LNG exporting nation of Qatar,
give us a significant presence in the rapidly growing LNG marine
transportation sector. We believe this platform provides a
strategic base from which we will seek to expand existing
relationships and attract new customers. |
|
|
|
Our management and the personnel of Teekay Shipping
Corporations subsidiaries who provide services to us have
extensive experience in fleet expansion. The Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general
partner, key employees of our subsidiary Teekay Spain and
personnel of other subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation
who provide services to us pursuant to advisory and
administrative services agreements have successfully identified
and acquired over $3.7 billion in vessels since 1999,
expanding Teekays fleet from 50 to 145 vessels
through a combination of newbuildings, vessel and business
acquisitions and, in some cases, joint ventures. These
individuals have overseen all aspects of the construction of
over 50 newbuildings (including those currently under order)
during that period, including: |
|
|
|
|
|
identifying and pre-qualifying shipyards with reputations for
quality workmanship and timely vessel completion; |
|
|
|
advising customers about technical vessel specifications and
suggested improvements, and conducting related negotiations with
the shipyard; and |
|
|
|
supervising construction quality and shipyard progress toward
identified budgetary constraints and completion milestones. |
|
|
|
|
|
We believe our relationship with Teekay Shipping
Corporation and its prominence and customer relationships in the
shipping industry significantly enhances our growth
opportunities. Established in 1973, Teekay Shipping
Corporation has achieved a global brand name in the shipping
industry, developed an extensive network of long-standing
relationships with major energy companies and earned a
reputation for reliability, safety and excellence. We believe
that our relationship with Teekay Shipping Corporation
significantly enhances our growth opportunities and that we are
able to leverage this relationship to our advantage in competing
for the transportation requirements of LNG projects and in
attracting and retaining long-term charter contracts throughout
the world. We also believe that Teekay Shipping
Corporations established relationships with leading
shipyards and |
112
|
|
|
|
|
the high number of newbuilding orders it places with these
shipyards will facilitate our interactions with these shipyards
during periods of shipyard production constraints, which is
anticipated over the next few years. |
|
|
|
We supplement our operational experience through continued
access to Teekay Shipping Corporations expertise in
various functions critical to our vessel operations. The
key employees of our primary operating subsidiary, Teekay Spain,
bring to us significant technical, financial and commercial
capabilities relating to vessel operations and other business
matters. Through Teekay Shipping Corporations extensive
experience operating its large fleet and its commitment to
exceptional customer service, it has developed specialized core
competencies addressing various functions critical to its and
our operations, has adopted best practices in the shipping
industry and has developed an infrastructure to efficiently
coordinate and implement these skills and practices.
Subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation have agreed to
provide ship management services to us, including: |
|
|
|
|
|
vessel maintenance; |
|
|
|
crewing; |
|
|
|
purchasing; |
|
|
|
shipyard supervision; |
|
|
|
insurance; and |
|
|
|
financial services. |
|
|
|
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Advisory and Administrative Services
Agreements Advisory, Technical and Administrative
Services Agreements Between Certain of Our Operating
Subsidiaries and Teekay Shipping Limited. We believe these
services complement our existing operational experience and
provide strict quality and cost controls and effective safety
monitoring. |
|
|
|
|
|
We have financial flexibility to pursue acquisitions and
other expansion opportunities through additional debt borrowings
and the issuance of additional partnership units. Our
existing revolving credit facility provides us access to
approximately $100 million for working capital and
acquisition purposes. We believe that borrowings available under
our revolving credit facility, access to other bank financing
facilities and the debt capital markets, and our ability to
issue additional partnership units will provide us with
financial flexibility to pursue acquisition and expansion
opportunities. |
Our Fleet
Our current fleet consists of four LNG carriers and five
Suezmax-class crude oil tankers. We will acquire three
additional Suezmax tankers from Teekay Shipping Corporation upon
the closing of this offering. We also have agreed to acquire
from Teekay Shipping Corporation its 70% interest in Teekay
Nakilat, which owns the three RasGas II LNG newbuildings,
once the first of the three vessels is delivered. The scheduled
delivery dates for the three RasGas II LNG carriers are
during the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first half of 2007.
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase RasGas II
Interest.
All of our existing vessels operate and the LNG newbuildings and
the three Suezmax tankers we will purchase from Teekay Shipping
Corporation will operate, under long-term time charters with
major energy and utility companies. All of these vessels are or
will be of Spanish or Bahamian registry and double-hulled.
113
The following table provides additional information about our
LNG vessels as of October 1, 2005. The delivery dates for
the newbuildings are based on current shipyard schedules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
Vessel |
|
Capacity | |
|
Delivery | |
|
Our Ownership |
|
Charterer | |
|
Charter Term* | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(cubic meters) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating LNG carriers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispania Spirit
|
|
|
140,500 |
|
|
|
Sept. 2002 |
|
|
100% |
|
|
Repsol YPF |
|
|
|
17 years(1) |
|
Catalunya Spirit
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
Aug. 2003 |
|
|
Capital lease(2) |
|
|
Gas Natural SDG |
|
|
|
18 years(1) |
|
Galicia Spirit
|
|
|
140,500 |
|
|
|
July 2004 |
|
|
100% |
|
|
Unión Fenosa Gas |
|
|
|
24 years(3) |
|
Madrid Spirit
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
Dec. 2004 |
|
|
Capital lease(2) |
|
|
Repsol YPF |
|
|
|
19 years(1) |
|
Newbuildings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hull No. 2238
|
|
|
151,700 |
|
|
|
Oct. 2006 |
|
|
Teekay-owned(4) |
|
|
RasGas II |
|
|
|
20 years(5) |
|
Hull No. 2239
|
|
|
151,700 |
|
|
|
Jan. 2007 |
|
|
Teekay-owned(4) |
|
|
RasGas II |
|
|
|
20 years(5) |
|
Hull No. 2240
|
|
|
151,700 |
|
|
|
Apr. 2007 |
|
|
Teekay-owned(4) |
|
|
RasGas II |
|
|
|
20 years(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capacity:
|
|
|
1,012,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Each of our time charters are subject to certain termination and
purchase obligations. Please read LNG Time
Charters Purchase Options, Termination Rights and
Bareboat Conversion Options. |
|
(1) |
The charterer has two options to extend the term for an
additional five years each. |
|
(2) |
We lease the vessel under a Spanish tax lease arrangement and
will purchase the vessel when the lease terminates in 2006 for
the Catalunya Spirit and 2011 for the Madrid
Spirit. Please read Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Ship Financing Arrangements. |
|
(3) |
The charterer has one option to extend the term for an
additional five years. |
|
(4) |
These newbuilding vessels are currently owned by subsidiaries of
Teekay Shipping Corporation. Upon the delivery of the first
vessel, we will purchase Teekay Shipping Corporations 70%
interest in Teekay Nakilat, which owns the vessels. We
anticipate that Teekay Shipping Corporation will complete
U.K. lease arrangements for the financing of these vessels.
Please read Managements Discussion and Analysis and
Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Ship Financing Arrangements and
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase RasGas II
Interest. |
|
(5) |
The charterer has three options to extend the term for an
additional five years each. |
As of October 1, 2005, our LNG carriers had an average age
of approximately two years, compared to the world LNG carrier
fleet average age of approximately 13.4 years. LNG carriers
are generally expected to have a lifespan of approximately
40 years. All of our LNG vessels have a membrane-type
containment system. Please see Industry
Liquefied Natural Gas LNG Shipping
Industry LNG Carriers for a description of
this system.
Our customers are free to use our LNG carriers worldwide or to
sublet the vessels to third parties. Our LNG carriers generally
transport LNG from Trinidad and Tobago to the United States and
Spain and from Egypt to Spain.
Each LNG carrier that is owned by us or Teekay Shipping
Corporation, other than the Galicia Spirit, is encumbered
by a mortgage relating to the vessels financing. Each of
the Catalunya Spirit and the Madrid Spirit is
subject to a capital lease and a mortgage associated with our
financing of the restricted cash deposits associated with the
vessel.
LNG Newbuildings. We have contracted to acquire
from Teekay Shipping Corporation all of its interest in the
three RasGas II LNG newbuildings. Teekay Shipping
Corporation has agreed to finance the construction of the
RasGas II vessels, which allows us to defer our need to
finance them. Please read Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Agreement to Purchase
RasGas II Interest.
114
The following table provides additional information about our
Suezmax oil tankers as of October 1, 2005, including the
three tankers we will acquire from Teekay Shipping Corporation
upon the closing of this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
Vessel |
|
Capacity | |
|
Delivery | |
|
Our Ownership |
|
Charterer |
|
Charter Term |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dwt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Tankers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenerife Spirit
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
July 2000 |
|
|
Capital lease(1) |
|
CEPSA |
|
15 years(2) |
Algeciras Spirit
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
Oct. 2000 |
|
|
Capital lease(1) |
|
CEPSA |
|
15 years(2) |
Huelva Spirit
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
Mar. 2001 |
|
|
Capital lease(1) |
|
CEPSA |
|
16 years(2) |
Teide Spirit
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
Oct. 2004 |
|
|
Capital lease(1) |
|
CEPSA |
|
19 years(2) |
Toledo Spirit
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
July 2005 |
|
|
Capital lease(1) |
|
CEPSA |
|
20 years(2) |
Acquired Tankers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Spirit
|
|
|
151,800 |
|
|
|
Sept. 2003 |
|
|
100%(3) |
|
ConocoPhillips |
|
10 years(4) |
African Spirit
|
|
|
151,700 |
|
|
|
Nov. 2003 |
|
|
100%(3) |
|
ConocoPhillips |
|
10 years(4) |
Asian Spirit
|
|
|
151,700 |
|
|
|
Jan. 2004 |
|
|
100%(3) |
|
ConocoPhillips |
|
10 years(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capacity:
|
|
|
1,252,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We are the lessee under a capital lease arrangement and are
required to purchase the vessel seven years after the
commencement of the capital lease, which we expect to accomplish
by assuming the existing vessel financing. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Ship Financing Arrangements. |
|
(2) |
CEPSA has the right to terminate the time charter 13 years
after the original delivery date, in which case we are generally
expected to sell the vessel, subject to our right of first
refusal to purchase the vessel. Please read
Crude Oil Time Charters Rights to
Terminate Charter or Cause Sale of Vessel. |
|
(3) |
Reflects our ownership following acquisition of the vessel from
Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of this offering.
Please read Certain Relationship and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase Suezmax Tankers
and Time Charters. |
|
(4) |
The term of the time charter is 12 years from the original
delivery date, which may be extended at the customers
option for up to an additional six years. In addition, the
customer has the right to terminate the time charter upon notice
and payment of a cancellation fee. Either party also may require
the sale of the vessel at any time, subject to the other
partys right of first refusal to purchase the vessel.
Please read Crude Oil Time
Charters Rights to Terminate Charter or Cause Sale
of Vessel. |
As of October 1, 2005, our Suezmax tankers had an average
age of approximately three years, compared to the average age of
8.6 years for the world Suezmax conventional tanker fleet.
The average age of the Suezmax tankers we will acquire from
Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of this offering is
two years. New Suezmax tankers generally are expected to have a
lifespan of approximately 25 to 30 years, based on
estimated hull fatigue life. However, United States and
international regulations require the earlier phase-out of
single-hulled vessels, regardless of their expected lifespan.
All of our Suezmax tankers are double-hulled.
The Suezmax tankers chartered to CEPSA are subject to a capital
lease and a mortgage associated with the lessors financing
of the vessel.
115
Our Customers
We provide or will provide LNG marine transportation services
under long-term time charters to the following major energy
companies or their affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
Repsol YPF, S.A., Spains largest oil company
and largest seller of liquefied petroleum gas. As of
December 31, 2004, Repsol reported having proved reserves
of 4.9 billion barrels of crude oil equivalent, mostly in
Latin America, the Middle East and North Africa. Repsol owns
Argentinas largest oil company and, as of
December 31, 2004, had operations in 32 countries and owned
five refineries in Spain and four refineries in Latin America. |
|
|
|
Gas Natural SDG, S.A., Spains largest
natural gas distributor. Gas Natural operates a group of
companies that supply, store, transport and distribute natural
gas in Spain and Latin America. As of December 31, 2004,
Gas Natural reported having 4.8 million Spanish customers
and 4.5 million Latin American customers. As of
December 31, 2004, Repsol owned approximately 30.8% of Gas
Natural. |
|
|
|
Unión Fenosa Gas, S.A., a jointly held
subsidiary of Unión Fenosa, S.A., a diversified Spanish
energy and telecommunication company, and ENI S.p.a., an Italian
oil and gas company. Unión Fenosas primary business
is the generation, distribution and commercialization of
electricity and natural gas in Spain. |
|
|
|
RasGas II, a joint venture between Qatar
Petroleum and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil
Corporation, established for the purpose of expanding LNG
production in Qatar. RasGas II will become one of our
customers following our acquisition from Teekay Shipping
Corporation of all of its interest in the three RasGas II
LNG newbuildings and related time charters. We expect to take
delivery of the three vessels during the fourth quarter of 2006
and the first half of 2007. |
We provide or following this offering will provide, crude oil
marine transportation services under long-term time charters to
the following major energy companies or their affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. (or
CEPSA), a Spanish energy conglomerate. CEPSA is
Spains second largest oil company and a diversified
provider of natural gas and petrochemical products. Teekay Spain
or its predecessors have provided services to CEPSA since 1988. |
|
|
|
ConocoPhillips, the third largest energy company
and the second largest oil refiner in the United States. A
subsidiary of ConocoPhillips will become one of our customers
upon the transfer to us of the three Suezmax tankers and related
charters in connection with the closing of this offering. |
CEPSA, Repsol and Gas Natural accounted for 47%, 26% and 11% of
our 2003 revenues, 36%, 18% and 21% of our 2004 revenues and
30%, 34% and 19% of our revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2005, respectively. In addition, Unión Fenosa
Gas, S.A. accounted for 17% of our revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2005. No other customer accounted for 10% or
more of our revenues during any of these periods. The loss of
any significant customer or a substantial decline in the amount
of services requested by a significant customer could harm our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Time Charters General Provisions
We provide the services of our vessels to our customers under
time charters, and we operate certain of our vessels pursuant to
capital leases, which include our contractual right to full
operation of the vessel pursuant to bareboat charters. A time
charter is a contract for the use of a vessel for a fixed period
of time at a specified daily rate. Under a time charter, the
vessel owner provides crewing and other services related to the
vessels operation, the cost of which is included in the
daily rate; the customer is responsible for
116
substantially all of the vessel voyage costs. The following
discussion describes the material terms common to all of our
long-term time charters, and then describes additional material
terms common to the contracts for our LNG vessels and our oil
tankers. The time charters for each type of vessel contain
generally similar terms.
The initial term for a time charter commences upon the
vessels delivery. All of our LNG time charters include
options, exercisable by the customer, to extend the
charters term. Under these charters, the customer may also
extend the term for periods in which the vessel is off-hire, as
described below. Our crude oil time charters with CEPSA do not
include term extensions. All of our customers have rights to
terminate their charters prior to expiration of the original
term in specified circumstances (or any extension term),
including purchase options and sale rights, as described in more
detail below.
Hire rate refers to the basic payment from the
customer for the use of the vessel. Hire is payable monthly, in
advance, in U.S. Dollars or Euros, as specified in the
charter. The hire rate includes two general
components a capital cost component and an operating
expense component. The capital component relates to the
financing obligations for the vessels purchase and
typically is structured to meet the repayment schedule for the
financing. The operating component is intended to compensate us
for vessel operating expenses and provide us a profit. The
amount of the operating component is established between the
parties at the beginning of the charter and it typically
increases annually based on changes in a specified
cost-of-living index.
Hire payments may be reduced, or under some charters we must pay
liquidated damages, if the vessel does not perform to certain of
its specifications, such as if the average vessel speed falls
below a guaranteed speed or the amount of fuel consumed to power
the vessel under normal circumstances exceeds a guaranteed
amount. Historically, we have had four instances of hire rate
reductions, none of which had a material impact on our operating
results.
We are responsible for vessel operating expenses, which include
crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils
and communication expenses. We are also directly responsible for
providing all of these items and services. The customer
generally pays the voyage expenses, which include all expenses
relating to particular voyages, including any bunker fuel
expenses, port fees, cargo loading and unloading expenses, canal
tolls, agency fees and commissions.
When the vessel is off-hire or not
available for service the customer generally is not
required to pay the hire rate, and we are responsible for all
costs. Prolonged off-hire may lead to vessel substitution or
termination of the time charter. A vessel generally will be
deemed off-hire if there is a loss of time due to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
operational deficiencies; drydocking for repairs, maintenance or
inspection; equipment breakdowns; or delays due to accidents,
crewing strikes, certain vessel detentions or similar
problems; or |
|
|
|
our failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with its
specifications and contractual standards or to provide the
required crew. |
|
|
|
Ship Management and Maintenance |
Under all of our time charters, we are responsible for the
technical management of the vessel and for maintaining the
vessel, periodic drydocking, cleaning and painting and
performing work required by regulations. Subsidiaries of Teekay
Shipping Corporation provide many of these services to us
pursuant to
117
services agreements. Please read Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Advisory and
Administrative Services Agreements Advisory,
Technical and Administrative Services Agreements Between Certain
of Our Operating Subsidiaries and Teekay Shipping Limited.
Each time charter terminates automatically upon loss of the
vessel. In addition, we are generally entitled to suspend
performance (but with the continuing accrual to our benefit of
hire payments and default interest) and, under most time
charters, terminate the charter if the customer defaults in its
payment obligations. Under most of our time charters, either
party may also terminate the charter in the event of war in
specified countries or in locations that would significantly
disrupt the free trade of the vessel.
LNG Time Charters
In addition to standard reductions in hire rates for failing to
achieve guaranteed speed or fuel consumption, our LNG customers
are entitled to reduce our hire rate if boil-off gas exceeds
guaranteed amounts or the LNG vessels cargo capacity is
reduced for any reason. One customer is entitled to liquidated
damages for performance deficiencies at the time of delivery and
hire reductions for deficiencies thereafter. Our charters with
three customers prevent the customer from reducing hire below
the capital component, even if the carrier is deemed to be
off-hire under the charter. In recognition of the depreciated
value of an older vessel, the LNG time charters provide for
reductions in the fixed component of the hire rate during any
term extensions.
Under our LNG time charters, if the vessel remains off-hire for
extended periods, the customer may, and in some cases may be
required by the ship financing lenders to, exercise some or all
of the following remedies, which vary by time charter:
|
|
|
|
|
request that we provide a substitute vessel, which the customer
must accept on the hire terms of the original time charter; |
|
|
|
require us to pay the difference between the hire rate in the
time charter and the cost of chartering a substitute vessel, up
to 30% of the original hire rate; |
|
|
|
take over management of the vessel and set off management
expenses from the hire payments under the time charter (but not
against the fixed hire rate component); or |
|
|
|
terminate the time charter contract. |
|
|
|
Ship Delivery and Modifications |
If delivery of the vessel to the customer is delayed, we (or in
the case of some charters, Teekay Shipping Corporation) must pay
liquidated damages in amounts equal to or, under some charters,
almost double, the hire rate during the delay. For prolonged
delays, the customer may terminate the charter. We typically
have some recourse against the shipbuilder for payments we are
required to make as a result of these delays. Historically we
have experienced few delays in the delivery of newbuildings from
shipyards, and we maintain personnel at the shipyards who are
dedicated to overseeing the timely and quality construction of
our newbuildings. After delivery, the LNG customers may request
vessel modifications, but they are responsible for the cost of
these modifications and the hire during the related drydock time.
|
|
|
Purchase Options, Termination Rights and Bareboat
Conversion Options |
Our LNG customers may terminate our time charters under three
different types of provisions: purchase options, termination
rights, and the right to convert the time charter to a bareboat
charter, in
118
which case we would no longer be responsible for the ships
operation but would receive only an amount slightly greater than
the fixed component of the hire rate. Customers also may
terminate time charters for off-hire reasons or our failure to
deliver to the vessel, as discussed above. The charters provide
for the more specific termination rights in one of three general
forms:
Under the first form of time charter (generally covering three
charters),
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may purchase the vessel |
|
|
|
(a) at the end of the initial or any extended charter
period, at a price designated in the charter; or |
|
|
(b) if the customers LNG sales agreement supplying
the LNG designated for our services is terminated, at a price
that covers all of our outstanding indebtedness on the vessel
and any prepayment fees (or, if applicable, an amount that
approximates the amount of debt that would have been outstanding
had we not prepaid the indebtedness in connection with our
initial public offering) plus an additional amount designated in
the charter; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may terminate the charter |
|
|
|
(a) if the customers LNG sales agreement supplying
the LNG designated for our services is terminated, in which case
the customer would be obligated to pay all outstanding
indebtedness on the vessel and any prepayment fees (or, if
applicable, an amount that approximates the amount of debt that
would have been outstanding had we not prepaid the indebtedness
in connection with our initial public offering); or |
|
|
(b) if the free trade of the vessel is disrupted due to
war, without any payment or penalty. |
Under the second form of time charter (covering one charter),
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may purchase the vessel at any time at a price that
equals the amount of indebtedness that would had been
outstanding had we not prepaid the indebtedness on the vessel in
connection with our initial public offering, plus an additional
amount designated in the charter; and |
|
|
|
the customer may terminate the time charter if the supply of LNG
is generally unavailable, in which case the customer would be
obligated to pay an amount equal to the indebtedness that would
have been outstanding on the vessel had we not prepaid the
indebtedness in connection with our initial public offering. |
Under the third form of time charter (covering three charters),
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may purchase the vessel |
|
|
|
(a) when it is otherwise entitled to terminate the charter
or under certain circumstances if we are in default under the
charter, at a price designated in the charter that is designed
to cover all of our remaining financing costs plus certain lost
profits; or |
|
|
(b) at any time at a price designated in the charter that
is designed to cover all of our remaining financing costs,
certain lost profits and an additional amount; |
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may terminate the charter |
|
|
|
(a) at any time, in which case the customer would be
obligated to pay a substantial cancellation fee; or |
|
|
(b) in the event of a prolonged continuation of certain
specified force majeure events that are beyond the
parties control and that would prevent the customers
performance under the charter (including damage to or
destruction of relevant LNG production facilities or LNG
customer regasification facilities), upon our bankruptcy or if
we are in breach of a specified provision of the charter, in
each case without any payment or penalty; and |
119
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may convert the time charter to a bareboat charter |
|
|
|
(a) if we breach our obligations to deliver a vessel built
to the customers specifications or to remedy warranty
deficiencies and we fail to cure this breach; |
|
|
|
(b) if, due to our negligence, the vessel is involved in a
significant marine incident or is off-hire for a prolonged
period; or |
|
|
|
|
(c) if the customer could otherwise then terminate the time
charter. |
|
Crude Oil Time Charters
Rights to Terminate Charter or Cause Sale of
Vessel. In connection with CEPSAs desire to be
able to renew the tankers it charters and keep the tankers at a
relatively young age, all of our crude oil time charters give
CEPSA the right, at any time after 13 years from delivery of the
tanker (between 2013 and 2018), to cancel the time charter and
require the sale of the tanker. Even in that event, however, we
have the right to retain the vessel. CEPSA also may terminate
our crude oil time charters in the event of war, as described
above.
Under each of the time charters relating to the three Suezmax
tankers we will acquire upon the closing of this offering, the
customer may require the sale of the vessel at the
then-prevailing market price, and we can require the sale of the
vessel at any time after 60 months following its original
delivery. If the prevailing market price exceeds specific values
set forth in the time charter that vary over time, the customer
and we will split the profits, provided that the party not
requiring the sale receives at least $1.0 million. If the
prevailing market rate is less than the applicable vessel value
set forth in the time charter, the customer must pay us the
greater of the deficiency or $1.5 million. The party not
requiring the sale of the vessel has a right of first refusal to
purchase the vessel at the prevailing market rate. The time
charter terminates upon a sale of the vessel required by either
party.
Under these time charters, the customer also may require the
sale of the vessel if the charter is rendered commercially
impracticable while the vessel is off-hire. If the vessel is
sold below the applicable specified value in these
circumstances, the customer is not required to pay us the value
of the deficiency. The customer also may terminate the charter
at its option upon notice and payment of a specified
cancellation fee, ranging from $1.2 million to
$2.5 million for each year remaining under the term of the
time charter, depending on the year of cancellation.
Classification, Inspection and Maintenance
The seafaring staff operating our vessels regularly inspect them
and perform much of the necessary routine maintenance.
Shore-based operational and technical specialists also inspect
our vessels at least twice a year for conformity with
established criteria. Upon completion of each inspection,
recommendations are made for improving the overall condition of
the vessel and its maintenance, safety and crew welfare. All
recommendations are monitored until they are completed. Our
objectives are to:
|
|
|
|
|
maintain the structural integrity of the vessel; |
|
|
|
ensure reliability; |
|
|
|
optimize performance in terms of speed and fuel
consumption; and |
|
|
|
ensure the vessels appearance will support our brand and
meet customer expectations. |
To achieve our vessel structural integrity objective, we use a
comprehensive Structural Integrity Management System
developed by Teekay Shipping Corporation. This system is
designed to monitor the condition of our vessels closely and to
ensure that structural strength and integrity are maintained
throughout a vessels life.
All of our vessels have been certified as being
in-class by their respective classification
societies: Bureau Veritas, Det Norske Veritas or Lloyds
Register of Shipping. Every vessels hull and machinery is
120
classed by a classification society. The
classification society certifies that the vessel has been built
and is maintained in accordance with the rules of that
classification society and complies with applicable rules and
regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and the
international conventions of which that country is a signatory,
although for some of our vessels we obtain this latter
certification directly from the relevant flag state authorities.
Each vessel is inspected by a classification society surveyor
annually, with either the second or third annual inspection
being a more detailed survey (or an Intermediate Survey)
and the fourth or fifth annual inspection being the most
comprehensive survey (or a Special Survey). The
inspection cycle resumes after each Special Survey. Vessels also
may be required to be drydocked at each Intermediate and Special
Survey for inspection of the underwater parts of the vessel and
resulting repairs. Intermediate Surveys of steam-propelled LNG
vessels may be done while the vessel is in service, but in all
instances the inspection requires shutting down the
vessels main boiler, which slows travel if in service.
In-water surveys generally take vessels out of service for one
day, but out-of-service surveys of steam-propelled LNG vessels
can take up to seven days. All of our LNG carriers, including
our newbuildings, are steam-propelled. Many of our vessels have
qualified with their respective classification societies for
drydocking every four or five years in connection with the
Special Survey and are no longer subject to the Intermediate
Survey drydocking process. To qualify, we were required to
enhance the resiliency of the underwater coatings of each vessel
and mark the hull to accommodate underwater inspections by
divers. All but one of our LNG vessels meet these requirements,
and we expect the non-qualifying vessel will be qualified at its
next Special Survey.
In addition to the classification inspections, many of our
customers regularly inspect our vessels as a precondition to
chartering, and regular inspections are standard practice under
long-term charters as well. Port and flag state control
authorities, such as the U.S. Coast Guard and Spains
flag administration (or classification societies acting on
behalf of the flag state control authorities), also inspect some
of our vessels. We believe that our relatively new,
well-maintained and high-quality vessels should provide us with
a competitive advantage in the current environment of increasing
regulation and customer emphasis on quality of service.
Safety, Management of Ship Operations and Administration
Safety is our top operational priority. Our vessels are operated
in a manner intended to protect the safety and health of our
employees, the general public and the environment. We actively
manage the risks inherent in our business and are committed to
eliminating incidents that threaten safety, such as groundings,
fires, collisions and petroleum and LNG spills. We are also
committed to reducing emissions and waste generation.
We have established key performance indicators to facilitate
regular monitoring of our operational performance. We set
targets on an annual basis to drive continuous improvement, and
we review performance indicators monthly to determine if
remedial action is necessary to reach our targets.
Teekay Spains shore staff performs a full range of
technical, commercial and business development services for us.
This staff also provides administrative support to our
operations in finance, accounting and human resources.
Teekay Shipping Corporation, through its subsidiaries, assists
us in managing our ship operations. Teekay Shipping Corporation
has obtained through Det Norske Veritas, the Norwegian
classification society, approval of its safety management system
as in compliance with the International Safety Management Code
(or ISM Code), and this system has been implemented for
our Bahamian-flagged vessels. Spains flag administration
has approved this safety management system for our
Spanish-flagged vessels. As part of Teekay Shipping
Corporations ISM Code compliance, all of our vessels
safety management certificates are being maintained through
ongoing internal audits performed by Teekay Shipping
Corporations certified internal auditors and intermediate
audits performed by Det Norske Veritas or Spains flag
administration.
In addition to our operational experience, Teekay Shipping
Corporation provides, through its subsidiaries, expertise in
various functions critical to our operations. This affords a
safe, efficient and cost-
121
effective operation and, pursuant to administrative services
agreements with certain subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping
Corporation, access to human resources, financial and other
administrative functions.
Critical ship management functions that Teekay Shipping
Corporation has agreed to provide to us through its Teekay
Marine Services division located in various offices around the
world include:
|
|
|
|
|
vessel maintenance; |
|
|
|
crewing; |
|
|
|
purchasing; |
|
|
|
shipyard supervision; |
|
|
|
insurance; and |
|
|
|
financial services. |
These functions are supported by onboard and onshore systems for
maintenance, inventory, purchasing and budget management.
In addition, Teekay Shipping Corporations day-to-day focus
on cost control is applied to our operations. In 2003, Teekay
Shipping Corporation and two other shipping companies
established a purchasing alliance, Teekay Bergesen Worldwide,
which leverages the purchasing power of the combined fleets,
mainly in such commodity areas as lube oils, paints and other
chemicals. Through our arrangements with Teekay Shipping
Corporation, we benefit from this purchasing alliance.
The generally uniform design of some of our existing and
newbuilding vessels and the adoption of common equipment
standards should also result in operational efficiencies,
including with respect to crew training and vessel management,
equipment operation and repair, and spare parts ordering.
Crewing and Staff
As of October 1, 2005, we employed approximately 392
seagoing staff who serve on our vessels and approximately 31
shore staff. Teekay Shipping Corporation and its subsidiaries
may employ additional seagoing staff to assist us as we grow,
and will staff the three Suezmax tankers we are purchasing in
connection with this offering. Certain subsidiaries of Teekay
Shipping Corporation will provide advisory, operational and
administrative support to us pursuant to service agreements.
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Advisory and Administrative Services
Agreements.
We regard attracting and retaining motivated seagoing personnel
as a top priority. Like Teekay Shipping Corporation, we offer
our seafarers highly competitive employment packages and
comprehensive benefits and opportunities for personal and career
development, which relates to a philosophy of promoting
internally.
Teekay Shipping Corporation has entered into a Collective
Bargaining Agreement with the Philippine Seafarers Union,
an affiliate of the International Transport Workers
Federation (or ITF), and a Special Agreement with ITF
London, which covers substantially all of the officers and
seamen that operate our Bahamian-flagged vessels. Our officers
and seamen for our Spanish-flagged vessels are covered by a
collective bargaining agreement with Spains Union General
de Trabajadores and Comisiones Obreras. We believe our
relationships with these labor unions are good.
Our commitment to training is fundamental to the development of
the highest caliber of seafarers for our marine operations.
Teekay Shipping Corporation has agreed to allow our personnel to
participate in its training programs. Teekay Shipping
Corporations cadet training approach is designed to
balance academic learning with hands-on training at sea. Teekay
Shipping Corporation has relationships with training
institutions in Australia, Canada, Croatia, India, Latvia,
Norway, Philippines, South Africa and the United Kingdom. After
receiving formal instruction at one of these institutions, our
cadets training continues on board one of our vessels.
Teekay Shipping Corporation also has a career development plan
that we follow, which was devised to ensure a continuous flow of
qualified officers who are trained on its vessels and
122
familiarized with its operational standards, systems and
policies. We believe that high-quality crewing and training
policies will play an increasingly important role in
distinguishing larger independent shipping companies that have
in-house or affiliate capabilities from smaller companies that
must rely on outside ship managers and crewing agents on the
basis of customer service and safety.
Risk of Loss, Insurance and Risk Management
The operation of any ocean-going vessel carries an inherent risk
of catastrophic marine disasters, death or injury of persons and
property losses caused by adverse weather conditions, mechanical
failures, human error, war, terrorism, piracy and other
circumstances or events. In addition, the transportation of LNG
and crude oil is subject to the risk of spills and to business
interruptions due to political circumstances in foreign
countries, hostilities, labor strikes and boycotts. The
occurrence of any of these events may result in loss of revenues
or increased costs.
We carry hull and machinery and protection and
indemnity insurance coverage to protect against most of
the accident-related risks involved in the conduct of our
business. Hull and machinery insurance covers loss of or damage
to a vessel due to marine perils such as collisions, grounding
and weather. Protection and indemnity insurance indemnifies us
against other liabilities incurred while operating vessels,
including injury to our crew, third parties, cargo loss and
pollution. The current available amount of our coverage for
pollution is $1 billion per vessel per incident. We also
carry insurance policies covering war risks (including piracy
and terrorism) and, for our LNG carriers, loss of revenues
resulting from vessel off-hire time due to a marine casualty or
an officer or crew strike. However, we may not continue to carry
this loss of hire insurance based on its cost
compared to our off-hire experience. We believe that our current
insurance coverage is adequate to protect against most of the
accident-related risks involved in the conduct of our business
and that we maintain appropriate levels of environmental damage
and pollution coverage. However, we cannot assure that all
covered risks are adequately insured against, that any
particular claim will be paid or that we will be able to procure
adequate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates in
the future. More stringent environmental regulations at times in
the past have resulted in increased costs for, and may result in
the lack of availability of, insurance against the risks of
environmental damage or pollution. Please read Risk
Factors Risks Inherent in Our Business
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur
to our property or result from our operations.
We use in our operations Teekay Shipping Corporations
thorough risk management program that includes, among other
things, computer-aided risk analysis tools, maintenance and
assessment programs, a seafarers competence training program,
seafarers workshops and membership in emergency response
organizations. We believe we benefit from Teekay Shipping
Corporations commitment to safety and environmental
protection as certain of its subsidiaries assist us in managing
our vessel operations.
Teekay Shipping Corporation has achieved certification under the
standards reflected in International Standards
Organizations (or ISO) 9001 for quality
assurance, ISO 14001 for environment management systems,
OHSAS 18001 for Occupational Health and Safety, and the
IMOs International Management Code for the Safe Operation
of Ships and Pollution Prevention on a fully integrated basis.
Regulation
Our business and the operation of our vessels are significantly
affected by international conventions and national, state and
local laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which our
vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of their
registration. Because these conventions, laws and regulations
change frequently, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of
compliance or their impact on the resale price or useful life of
our vessels. Additional conventions, laws and regulations may be
adopted that could limit our ability to do business or increase
the cost of our doing business and that may materially adversely
affect our operations. We are required by various governmental
and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain permits, licenses and
certificates with respect to our operations. Subject to the
discussion below and to the fact that the kinds of permits,
licenses and certificates required for the operations of the
vessels we own depends on
123
a number of factors, we believe that we will be able to continue
to obtain all permits, licenses and certificates material to the
conduct of our operations.
We believe that the heightened environmental, quality and
security concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators and
charterers will generally lead to greater inspection and safety
requirements on all vessels in the LNG carrier and oil tanker
markets and will accelerate the scrapping of older vessels
throughout these industries.
|
|
|
Regulation International Maritime Organization
(or IMO) |
IMO regulations include the International Convention for Safety
of Life at Sea (or SOLAS), including amendments to SOLAS
implementing the International Security Code for Ports and Ships
(or ISPS), the ISM Code, the International Convention on
Prevention of Pollution from Ships (or the MARPOL
Convention), the International Convention on Civil Liability
for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969, the International Convention
on Load Lines of 1966, and, specifically with respect to LNG
carriers, the International Code for Construction and Equipment
of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (or the IGC
Code). SOLAS provides rules for the construction of and
equipment required for commercial vessels and includes
regulations for safe operation. Flag states which have ratified
the convention and the treaty generally employ the
classification societies, which have incorporated SOLAS
requirements into their class rules, to undertake surveys to
confirm compliance.
SOLAS and other IMO regulations concerning safety, including
those relating to treaties on training of shipboard personnel,
lifesaving appliances, radio equipment and the global maritime
distress and safety system, are applicable to our operations.
Non-compliance with IMO regulations, including SOLAS, the ISM
Code, ISPS and the IGC Code, may subject us to increased
liability or penalties, may lead to decreases in available
insurance coverage for affected vessels and may result in the
denial of access to or detention in some ports. For example, the
Coast Guard and European Union authorities have indicated that
vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code will be prohibited
from trading in U.S. and European Union ports.
The ISM Code requires vessel operators to obtain a safety
management certification for each vessel they manage, evidencing
the shipowners compliance with requirements of the ISM
Code relating to the development and maintenance of an extensive
Safety Management System. Such a system includes,
among other things, the adoption of a safety and environmental
protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for
safe operation and describing procedures for dealing with
emergencies. Each of the existing vessels in our fleet currently
is ISM Code-certified, and we expect to obtain safety management
certificates for each newbuilding vessel upon delivery.
ISPS was adopted in December 2002 in the wake of heightened
concern over worldwide terrorism and became effective on
July 1, 2004. The objective of ISPS is to enhance maritime
security by detecting security threats to ships and ports and by
requiring the development of security plans and other measures
designed to prevent such threats. The United States implemented
ISPS with the adoption of the Maritime Transportation Security
Act of 2002 (or MTSA), which requires vessels entering
U.S. waters to obtain certification of plans to respond to
emergency incidents there, including identification of persons
authorized to implement the plans. Each of the existing vessels
in our fleet currently complies with the requirements of ISPS
and MTSA, and we expect all newbuildings to comply upon delivery.
LNG carriers are also subject to regulation under the IGC Code.
Each LNG carrier must obtain a certificate of compliance
evidencing that it meets the requirements of the IGC Code,
including requirements relating to its design and construction.
Each of our LNG carriers currently is in substantial compliance
with the IGC Code, and each of our newbuilding shipbuilding
contracts requires compliance prior to delivery.
124
Under IMO regulations an oil tanker must be of double-hull
construction, be of a mid-deck design with double-side
construction or be of another approved design ensuring the same
level of protection against oil pollution in the event that such
tanker:
|
|
|
|
|
is the subject of a contract for a major conversion or original
construction on or after July 6, 1993; |
|
|
|
commences a major conversion or has its keel laid on or after
January 6, 1994; or |
|
|
|
completes a major conversion or is a newbuilding delivered on or
after July 6, 1996. |
In December 2003, the IMO revised its regulations relating to
the prevention of pollution from oil tankers. These regulations,
which became effective April 5, 2005, accelerate the
mandatory phase-out of single-hull tankers and impose a more
rigorous inspection regime for older tankers. Because all of our
oil tankers are double-hulled and were delivered after
July 6, 1996, our tankers will not be affected directly by
these IMO regulations.
Annex VI to MARPOL, which became effective internationally
on May 19, 2005, sets limits on sulfur dioxide and nitrogen
oxide emissions from ship exhausts and prohibits deliberate
emissions of ozone depleting substances. Annex VI also
imposes a global cap on the sulfur content of fuel oil and
allows for specialized areas to be established internationally
with more stringent controls on sulfur emissions. For vessels
over 400 gross tons, Annex VI imposes various survey
and certification requirements. The United States has not yet
ratified Annex VI. Vessels operated internationally,
however, are subject to the requirements of Annex VI in
those countries that have implemented its provisions. We believe
that the cost of our complying with Annex VI will not be
material.
|
|
|
Environmental Regulations The United States
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (or OPA 90) |
OPA 90 established an extensive regulatory and liability
regime for the protection and cleanup of the environment from
oil spills, including discharges of oil cargoes, fuel (or
bunkers) or lubricants. OPA 90 affects all owners and
operators whose vessels trade to the United States or its
territories or possessions or whose vessels operate in United
States waters, which include the U.S. territorial sea and
200-mile exclusive economic zone around the United States.
Under OPA 90, vessel owners, operators and bareboat
charterers are responsible parties and are jointly,
severally and strictly liable (unless the spill results solely
from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an
act of war and the responsible party reports the incident and
reasonably cooperates with the appropriate authorities) for all
containment and cleanup costs and other damages arising from
discharges or threatened discharges of oil from their vessels.
These other damages are defined broadly to include:
|
|
|
|
|
natural resources damages and the related assessment costs; |
|
|
|
real and personal property damages; |
|
|
|
net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, fees and other lost
revenues; |
|
|
|
lost profits or impairment of earning capacity due to property
or natural resources damage; |
|
|
|
net cost of public services necessitated by a spill response,
such as protection from fire, safety or health hazards; and |
|
|
|
loss of subsistence use of natural resources. |
OPA 90 limits the liability of responsible parties to the
greater of $1,200 per gross ton or $10 million per
tanker that is over 3,000 gross tons per incident, subject
to possible adjustment for inflation. These limits of liability
would not apply if the incident were proximately caused by
violation of applicable U.S. federal safety, construction
or operating regulations, including IMO conventions to which the
United States is a signatory, or by the responsible partys
gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the responsible
party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate
and assist in connection with the oil removal activities. We
currently plan to continue to maintain for each of our
vessels pollution liability
125
coverage in the amount of $1 billion per incident. A
catastrophic spill could exceed the coverage available, which
could harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Under OPA 90, with limited exceptions, all newly built or
converted tankers delivered after January 1, 1994 and
operating in United States waters must be built with
double-hulls. All of our tankers are double-hulled.
In December 1994, the United States Coast Guard (or Coast
Guard) implemented regulations requiring evidence of
financial responsibility in the amount of $1,500 per gross
ton for tankers, coupling the OPA limitation on liability of
$1,200 per gross ton with the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (or CERCLA)
liability limit of $300 per gross ton. Under the
regulations, such evidence of financial responsibility may be
demonstrated by insurance, surety bond, self-insurance, guaranty
or an alternate method subject to agency approval. Under
OPA 90, an owner or operator of a fleet of vessels is
required only to demonstrate evidence of financial
responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover the tank in the
fleet having the greatest maximum limited liability under OPA 90
and CERCLA.
The Coast Guards regulations concerning certificates of
financial responsibility (or COFR) provide, in accordance
with OPA 90, that claimants may bring suit directly against
an insurer or guarantor that furnishes COFR. In addition, in the
event that such insurer or guarantor is sued directly, it is
prohibited from asserting any contractual defense that it may
have had against the responsible party and is limited to
asserting those defenses available to the responsible party and
the defense that the incident was caused by the willful
misconduct of the responsible party. Certain organizations,
which had typically provided COFR under pre-OPA 90 laws,
including the major protection and indemnity organizations, have
declined to furnish evidence of insurance for vessel owners and
operators if they are subject to direct actions or required to
waive insurance policy defenses.
The Coast Guards financial responsibility regulations may
also be satisfied by evidence of surety bond, guaranty or by
self-insurance. Under the self-insurance provisions, the
shipowner or operator must have a net worth and working capital,
measured in assets located in the United States against
liabilities located anywhere in the world, that exceeds the
applicable amount of financial responsibility. We have complied
with the Coast Guard regulations by obtaining financial
guaranties from a third party. If other vessels in our fleet
trade into the United States in the future, we expect to obtain
additional guaranties from third-party insurers or to provide
guaranties through self-insurance.
OPA 90 and CERCLA permit individual states to impose their
own liability regimes with regard to oil or hazardous substance
pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and many
states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited strict
liability for spills. We intend to comply with all applicable
state regulations in the ports where our vessels call.
Owners or operators of tank vessels operating in United States
waters are required to file vessel response plans with the Coast
Guard, and their tank vessels are required to operate in
compliance with their Coast Guard approved plans. Such response
plans must, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
address a worst case scenario and identify and
ensure, through contract or other approved means, the
availability of necessary private response resources to respond
to a worst case discharge; |
|
|
|
describe crew training and drills; and |
|
|
|
identify a qualified individual with full authority to implement
removal actions. |
We have filed vessel response plans with the Coast Guard for the
tankers we own and have received approval of such plans for all
vessels in our fleet to operate in United States waters. In
addition, we conduct regular oil spill response drills in
accordance with the guidelines set out in OPA 90. The Coast
Guard has announced it intends to propose similar regulations
requiring certain vessels to prepare response plans for the
release of hazardous substances.
126
OPA 90 allows U.S. state legislatures to pre-empt
associated regulation if the states regulations are equal
or more stringent. Several coastal states such as California,
Washington and Alaska require state-specific COFR and vessel
response plans.
CERCLA contains a similar liability regime to OPA 90, but
applies to the discharge of hazardous substances
rather than oil. Petroleum products and LNG should
not be considered hazardous substances under CERCLA, but
additives to oil or lubricants used on LNG carriers might fall
within its scope. CERCLA imposes strict joint and several
liability upon the owner, operator or bareboat charterer of a
vessel for cleanup costs and damages arising from a discharge of
hazardous substances.
OPA 90 and CERCLA do not preclude claimants from seeking
damages for the discharge of oil and hazardous substances under
other applicable law, including maritime tort law. Such claims
could include attempts to characterize the transportation of LNG
aboard a vessel as an ultra-hazardous activity under a doctrine
that would impose strict liability for damages resulting from
that activity. The application of this doctrine varies by
jurisdiction. There can be no assurance that a court in a
particular jurisdiction will not determine that the carriage of
oil or LNG aboard a vessel is an ultra-hazardous activity, which
would expose us to strict liability for damages we cause to
injured parties even when we have not acted negligently.
|
|
|
Environmental Regulation Other Environmental
Initiatives |
Although the United States is not a party, many countries have
ratified and follow the liability scheme adopted by the IMO and
set out in the International Convention on Civil Liability for
Oil Pollution Damage, 1969, as amended (or CLC), and the
Convention for the Establishment of an International Fund for
Oil Pollution of 1971, as amended. Under these conventions,
which are applicable to vessels that carry persistent oil (not
LNG) as cargo, a vessels registered owner is strictly
liable for pollution damage caused in the territorial waters of
a contracting state by discharge of persistent oil, subject to
certain complete defenses. Many of the countries that have
ratified the CLC have increased the liability limits through a
1992 Protocol to the CLC. The liability limits in the countries
that have ratified this Protocol are currently approximately
$6.5 million plus approximately $899 per gross
registered tonne above 5,000 gross tonnes with an
approximate maximum of $128 million per vessel, with the
exact amount tied to a unit of account which varies according to
a basket of currencies. The right to limit liability is
forfeited under the CLC when the spill is caused by the
owners actual fault or privity and, under the 1992
Protocol, when the spill is caused by the owners
intentional or reckless conduct. Vessels trading to contracting
states must provide evidence of insurance covering the limited
liability of the owner. In jurisdictions where the CLC has not
been adopted, various legislative schemes or common law governs,
and liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or in a
manner similar to the CLC.
In addition, the IMO, various countries and states, such as
Australia, the United States and the State of California, and
various regulators, such as port authorities, the
U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, have either adopted legislation or regulations, or are
separately considering the adoption of legislation or
regulations, aimed at regulating the transmission, distribution,
supply and storage of LNG, the discharge of ballast water and
the discharge of bunkers as potential pollutants, and requiring
the installation on ocean-going vessels of pollution prevention
equipment such as oily water separators and bilge alarms.
Properties
Other than our vessels, we do not have any material property.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time we have been, and expect to continue to be,
subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course
of our business, principally personal injury and property
casualty claims. These claims, even if lacking merit, could
result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial
127
resources. We are not aware of any legal proceedings or claims
that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a
material adverse effect on us.
Taxation of the Partnership
|
|
|
Marshall Islands Taxation |
Based on the advice of Watson, Farley & Williams (New
York) LLP, our counsel as to matters of the law of the Republic
of The Marshall Islands, because we and our subsidiaries do not,
and we do not expect that we and our subsidiaries will, conduct
business or operations in the Republic of The Marshall Islands,
neither we nor our subsidiaries will be subject to income,
capital gains, profits or other taxation under current Marshall
Islands law. As a result, distributions by our subsidiaries to
us will not be subject to Marshall Islands taxation.
The following discussion is based upon the current tax laws of
Luxembourg and regulations, the Luxembourg tax administrative
practice and judicial decisions thereunder, all as in effect as
of the date of this prospectus and subject to possible change on
a retroactive basis. The following discussion is for general
information purposes only and does not purport to be a
comprehensive description of all of the Luxembourg income tax
considerations applicable to us.
Our operating subsidiary, Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. (a
Marshall Islands company), through its direct Luxembourg
subsidiary, Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (or Luxco), and
other intermediary subsidiaries, indirectly holds all of our
operating assets. Luxco is capitalized with equity and loans
from Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. Luxco, in turn, has re-lent a
substantial portion of the loan proceeds received from Teekay
LNG Operating L.L.C. to Teekay Spain S.L. (or Spainco).
Luxco used the remaining proceeds from the loans from and equity
purchases by Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. to purchase shares in
Spainco.
Luxco is considered a Luxembourg resident company for Luxembourg
tax purposes subject to taxation in Luxembourg on its income
regardless of where the income is derived. The generally
applicable Luxembourg income tax rate is approximately 30%.
Taxation of Interest Income. Luxcos loans to
Spainco generate interest income. However, because this interest
income is offset substantially by interest expense on the loan
made by Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. to Luxco, we believe that
any taxation of that income will be immaterial.
Taxation of Interest Payments. Luxembourg does not
levy a withholding tax on interest paid to corporate entities
non-resident of Luxembourg, such as Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C.,
unless the interest represents an unlimited right to participate
in profits of the interest-paying entity, or the interest
payment relates to the portion of debt used to acquire share
capital and the debt exceeds a Luxembourg thin
capitalization threshold or the interest rate is not
regarded as arms length. Based on guidance received by
Teekay Shipping Corporation from the Luxembourg taxing
authority, we believe interest paid by Luxco on the types of
loans made to it by Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. do not represent
a right to participate in its profits and are consistent with
Luxembourg transfer pricing rules. In addition, we have
capitalized Luxco in a manner we believe meets the thin
capitalization threshold. Accordingly, we believe that
interest payments made by Luxco to Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C.
are not subject to Luxembourg withholding tax.
Taxation of Spainco Dividends and Capital Gains.
Pursuant to Luxembourg law, dividends received by Luxco from
Spainco and capital gains realized on any disposal of Spainco
shares generally will be exempt from Luxembourg taxation if
certain requirements are met. We believe that Luxco will meet
these requirements and that any dividend received on or any
capital gain resulting from the disposition of the shares of
Spainco will be exempt from taxation in Luxembourg.
Notwithstanding this exemption, Luxembourg law does not permit
the deduction of interest expense on loans specifically used to
purchase shares eligible for the dividend exemption, to the
extent of any dividends received the same year and
128
derived from the shares financed by the loans. Similarly,
capital gains are tax exempt only for the portion exceeding the
interest expense generated by the loan financing the purchase of
shares and previously deducted. We currently do not intend to
dispose of the shares of Spainco. However, we believe that any
taxation on any gain resulting from any disposition of the
shares of Spainco would not be material.
Taxation of Luxco Dividends. Luxembourg levies a
20% withholding tax on dividends paid by a Luxembourg company to
a non-resident of the European Union (absent a tax treaty),
which would apply to dividends paid by Luxco to Teekay LNG
Operating L.L.C. However, we do not expect to cause Luxco to pay
dividends, but to distribute all of its available cash through
the payment of interest and principal on its loans owing to
Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C., for at least the next ten years. We
may also recapitalize another Luxembourg company in the future
to continue this arrangement, as is permitted under current
Luxembourg tax rules.
The following discussion is based upon the tax laws of Spain and
regulations, rulings and judicial decisions thereunder, all as
in effect as of the date of this prospectus and subject to
possible change on a retroactive basis. The following discussion
is for general information purposes only and does not purport to
be a comprehensive description of all of the Spanish income tax
considerations applicable to us.
Spainco owns, directly and indirectly, a number of other Spanish
subsidiaries, including those operating five of our Suezmax
tankers and all of our LNG carriers.
Spainco and these subsidiaries are considered Spanish resident
companies subject to Spanish taxation on their income regardless
of where the income is derived. The generally applicable Spanish
income tax rate is 35%. However, substantially all of the income
generated by these subsidiaries is subject to special tax
incentives for shipping activities, which we believe will
substantially reduce the amount of Spanish income tax payable.
Taxation of Spanish Subsidiaries Engaged in Shipping
Activities. Two alternative Spanish tax regimes provide
incentives for Spanish companies engaged in shipping activities.
The vessels operated by our operating Spanish subsidiaries
currently are subject to the first regime, but, as discussed
below, we currently expect to transfer any eligible vessels of
these subsidiaries to the second regime effective for the 2006
tax year.
To qualify under the first regime, the Spanish companys
vessels must be registered in the Canary Islands Special Ship
Registry. Under this registry, the Master and First Officer for
the vessel must be Spanish nationals and at least 50% of the
crew must be European Union nationals. All of the vessels of our
operating Spanish subsidiaries currently are registered in the
Canary Islands Special Ship Registry and meet these ship
personnel requirements. As a result, we believe that these
subsidiaries qualify for the tax benefits associated with the
first regime, representing a credit equal to 90% against the tax
otherwise payable on income from the commercial operation of the
vessels. This credit effectively reduces the Spanish tax rate on
this income to 3.5%. This deduction does not apply to gains from
vessel dispositions.
The second incentive regime, the Spanish Tonnage Tax Regime (or
the TTR), applies to Spanish companies that own or
operate vessels, but does not depend upon the registry of the
vessels. Consequently, there is no requirement for the vessel to
maintain the Spanish or Canary Island flag or to follow the
crewing requirements that correspond to these flags. However,
under a proposal currently under discussion in the Spanish
Parliament, it is possible that the TTR regime will be modified
to require that a certain percentage (measured in terms of net
tonnage) of the vessels owned or operated under the TTR regime
should be flagged in a European Union member state.
Under this regime, the applicable income tax is based on the
weight (measured as net tonnage) of the vessel and the number of
days during the taxable period that the vessel is at the
companys disposal, excluding time required for repairs.
129
The following table presents the applicable tax base for a
vessel under the TTR regime, against which the generally
applicable tax rate of 35% will apply:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnage Tax Base | |
Net Tonnage of Vessel |
|
Daily Rate per 100 Tonnes | |
|
|
| |
0 to 1,000
|
|
|
0.90 Euros |
|
1,001 to 10,000
|
|
|
0.70 Euros |
|
10,001 to 25,000
|
|
|
0.40 Euros |
|
Over 25,000
|
|
|
0.20 Euros |
|
To be eligible to apply the TTR regime:
|
|
|
|
|
a Spanish company must be enrolled in any Spanish registry for
shipping companies specified under the regime; |
|
|
|
the company must own or charter out vessels; |
|
|
|
the vessels must be managed strategically and commercially from
Spain or another country belonging to the European
Union; and |
|
|
|
the vessels must engage in certain maritime-related activities,
including the transportation of goods or merchandise. |
The Spanish company must make a request of the Spanish tax
authorities that the TTR regime apply to its activities. If the
eligibility criteria indicated above are met, these requests
routinely are granted. If granted, the TTR regime will apply to
the company for an initial period of 10 years, which may be
extended for successive 10-year periods upon application by the
shipping company.
If the shipping company also engages in activities other than
those subject to the TTR regime, income from those other
activities will be subject to tax at the generally applicable
rate of 35%.
If a vessel is acquired and disposed of by a company while it is
subject to the TTR regime or if the company acquired a used
vessel after the company became subject to the TTR regime, any
gain on the disposition of the vessel generally is not subject
to Spanish taxation. If the company acquired the vessel prior to
becoming subject to the TTR regime, the difference between the
fair market value of the vessel at the time it enters into the
TTR and the tax value of the vessel at that time is added to the
taxable income in Spain when the vessel is disposed of and
generally remains subject to Spanish taxation at the rate of 35%.
We believe that the TTR regime provides several advantages over
the first ship registry regime described above, including
increased flexibility on registering and crewing vessels, a
lower overall tax payable and a possible reduction in the
Spanish tax on any gain from the disposition of the vessels. As
a result, we currently expect to apply for all our eligible
vessels to be taxed under the Spanish TTR regime commencing with
the 2006 tax year.
Taxation on Distributions by Spanish Entities.
Income distributed to non-residents of Spain by our Spanish
subsidiaries as dividends may be subject to a 15% Spanish
withholding tax, unless the dividends are paid to an entity
resident in a European Union member state, subject to certain
requirements, or to an entity resident in a tax
treaty jurisdiction. In addition, interest paid by Spanish
entities on debt owed to non-residents of Spain is generally
subject to a 15% withholding tax.
Spainco has obtained shareholder approval for itself and its
subsidiaries to file a consolidated tax return for the 2005 tax
year. As a result, no withholding taxes should apply to any
interest or dividend payments made between Spainco and its
Spanish subsidiaries.
As described above, Spainco is capitalized with debt and equity
from Luxco, which owns 100% of Spainco. We expect that Spainco
will not pay dividends but will distribute all of its available
cash through the payment of interest and principal on its loans
owing to Luxco for at least the next ten years. Once these loans
are fully repaid, Spainco will distribute all of its available
cash to Luxco through dividends.
130
Pursuant to Spanish law, interest paid by Spainco to Luxco is
not subject to Spanish withholding tax if our Spanish
subsidiaries respect the debt-equity provisions applicable to
direct and indirect debt borrowed from non-European Union
resident related parties and if Luxco is a resident of
Luxembourg, Luxco does not have a permanent establishment in
Spain, and Luxco is not a company qualifying as a tax-exempt
1929 holding company under Luxembourg legislation. We believe
Luxco meets the Spanish law requirements. Consequently, we
believe that interest paid by Spainco to Luxco should not be
subject to withholding tax in Spain.
Pursuant to the European Union Parent-Subsidiary Directive,
dividends paid by Spainco to Luxco will not be subject to
Spanish withholding taxes if Luxco meets an ownership
requirement and a Luxembourg presence requirement. We believe
that at the time of distributions Luxco will satisfy both the
ownership and Luxembourg presence requirements and qualify for
the Spanish withholding tax exemption on any dividends that
Spainco may pay to Luxco.
The following discussion is based upon our knowledge of the tax
laws of Qatar and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions
thereunder, all as in effect as of the date of this prospectus
and subject to possible change on a retroactive basis. The Qatar
Public Revenue and Tax Department (or QPRTD) is not bound
by precedent. The following discussion is for general
information purposes only and does not purport to be a
comprehensive description of all of the Qatar income tax
considerations applicable to us.
The QPRTD has confirmed that foreign entities are subject to tax
in Qatar on income earned from international shipping within
Qatari waters. Qatar income tax is usually determined on a
consolidated basis for multiple foreign entities owned by a
common parent. In our case, the three RasGas II LNG
carriers we plan to operate in Qatar beginning in late 2006 will
be operated by separate shipowning subsidiaries owned by Teekay
Nakilat, of which we will own a 70% interest.
Based on the QPRTDs confirmation, we believe that Teekay
Nakilats income earned from activity in Qatar will be
taxable. Because the time charter revenue we will earn from the
Qatari voyages will be earned on a daily or time use basis, we
believe it is more likely than not that this revenue will be
taxable in Qatar only in relation to the time the vessels
operate in Qatari waters.
Expenses specifically and demonstrably related to the revenue
taxable in Qatar should be deductible in calculating income
subject to Qatari tax. Based on past practice, we believe that:
|
|
|
|
|
in relation to expenses that are incurred wholly, necessarily
and exclusively in relation to the periods for which individual
vessels operate in Qatari waters, the QPRTD should accept these
expenses as a deduction in arriving at taxable income; |
|
|
|
in relation to expenses that accrue over the period of the
time-charter contract for each vessel, it is more likely than
not that the QPRTD will accept an apportionment of these
expenses as a deduction in arriving at taxable income based on
the time the vessel operates in Qatari waters as a proportion of
the total period of the charter; and |
|
|
|
in relation to depreciation of each of the vessels in a tax
year, the QPRTD should accept as a deduction in arriving at
taxable income an apportionment of the annual depreciation
allowance permitted under the tax law based on the time the
vessel operates in Qatari waters. |
Based on our anticipated operation of the three RasGas II
LNG carriers, we believe that the allocation and deduction of
operating expenses, tax depreciation and interest expense to the
revenue taxable in Qatar should result in no taxation in Qatar
for the first ten years of operation. Furthermore, because our
time charters with RasGas II provide for a gross up payment
for any Qatari tax Teekay Nakilat must pay with respect to its
operation of the LNG carriers in Qatari waters, we believe any
Qatari taxes will not affect our financial results.
131
MANAGEMENT
Management of Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
Teekay GP L.L.C., our general partner, manages our operations
and activities. Unitholders are not entitled to elect the
directors of our general partner or directly or indirectly
participate in our management or operation.
Our general partner owes a fiduciary duty to our unitholders.
Our general partner is liable, as general partner, for all of
our debts (to the extent not paid from our assets), except for
indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly nonrecourse
to it. Whenever possible, our general partner intends to cause
us to incur indebtedness or other obligations that are
nonrecourse to it.
Three members of the board of directors of our general partner
serve on a conflicts committee to review specific matters that
the board believes may involve conflicts of interest. The
conflicts committee determines if the resolution of the conflict
of interest is fair and reasonable to us. The members of the
conflicts committee may not be officers or employees of our
general partner or directors, officers or employees of its
affiliates, and must meet the independence standards established
by the New York Stock Exchange to serve on an audit committee of
a board of directors and certain other requirements. Any matters
approved by the conflicts committee are deemed conclusively to
be fair and reasonable to us, approved by all of our partners,
and not a breach by our general partner of any duties it may owe
us or our unitholders. The conflicts committee is comprised of
the members of the audit committee of the board of directors of
our general partner. For additional information about the
conflicts committee, please read Conflicts of Interest and
Fiduciary Duties Conflicts of Interest.
The audit committee, which is composed of three independent
directors, reviews our external financial reporting, engages our
external auditors and oversees our internal audit activities and
procedures and the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.
The board of directors of our general partner also has a
corporate governance committee, which oversees corporate
governance matters, director compensation and the compensation
plan described below. The members of our audit committee and
other board committees are indicated in Directors,
Executive Officers and Key Employees below.
The New York Stock Exchange does not require a listed limited
partnership like us to have a majority of independent directors
on the board of directors of our general partner or to establish
a compensation committee or a nominating/corporate governance
committee. However, a majority of the directors of our general
partner meet the independence standards of the New York Stock
Exchange and, as discussed above, we maintain a corporate
governance committee.
The directors of our general partner oversee our operations. The
day-to-day affairs of our business are managed by the officers
of our general partner and key employees of certain of our
operating subsidiaries. Employees of certain subsidiaries of
Teekay Shipping Corporation provide assistance to us and our
operating subsidiaries pursuant to services agreements. Please
read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Advisory and Administrative Services
Agreements.
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our
general partner, Peter Evensen, allocates his time between
managing our business and affairs and the business and affairs
of Teekay Shipping Corporation. Mr. Evensen is the
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Teekay
Shipping Corporation. The amount of time Mr. Evensen
allocates between our business and the businesses of Teekay
Shipping Corporation varies from time to time depending on
various circumstances and needs of the businesses, such as the
relative levels of strategic activities of the businesses.
Mr. Evensen devotes sufficient time to our business and
affairs as is necessary for their proper conduct.
Officers of Teekay LNG Projects Ltd., a subsidiary of Teekay
Shipping Corporation, allocate their time between providing LNG
strategic consulting and advisory services to certain of our
operating subsidiaries and pursuing LNG project opportunities
for Teekay Shipping Corporation, which projects, if awarded to
Teekay Shipping Corporation, are offered to us pursuant to the
noncompetition provisions of the omnibus agreement. Please read
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Omnibus
132
Agreement Noncompetition and
Advisory and Administrative Services
Agreements LNG Strategic Consulting and Advisory
Services Agreements Between Certain of Our Operating
Subsidiaries and Teekay Shipping Limited. The omnibus
agreement also permits us to pay to Teekay Shipping Corporation
any incentive fees approved by the conflicts
committee of our general partners board of directors, in
its sole discretion, and relating to LNG projects provided to us
by Teekay Shipping Corporation. Any such fee would be intended
to reward Teekay Shipping Corporation for obtaining, and to
further motivate it in pursuing additional, LNG projects. Teekay
Shipping Corporation, in turn, may pay incentive fees to Teekay
LNG Projects Ltd. for LNG projects awarded to it as a result of
the efforts of Teekay LNG Projects Ltd.
Officers of our general partner and those individuals providing
services to us or our subsidiaries may face a conflict regarding
the allocation of their time between our business and the other
business interests of Teekay Shipping Corporation. Our general
partner seeks to cause its officers to devote as much time to
the management of our business and affairs as is necessary for
the proper conduct of our business and affairs.
Directors, Executive Officers and Key Employees
The following table provides information about the directors and
executive officers of our general partner and key employees of
our operating subsidiary Teekay Spain. Directors are elected for
one-year terms. The business address of each of our directors
and executive officers listed below is c/o TK House,
Bayside Executive Park, West Bay Street and Blake Road, Nassau,
Commonwealth of The Bahamas. The business address of each of our
key employees of Teekay Spain is Musgo Street 5
28023, Madrid, Spain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
C. Sean Day
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Chairman |
Bjorn Moller
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Vice Chairman and Director |
Peter Evensen
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director |
Robert E. Boyd
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Director* |
Ida Jane Hinkley
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Director* |
Ihab J.M. Massoud
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Director |
George Watson
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director* |
Bruce C. Bell
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Secretary |
Andres Luna
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Managing Director, Teekay Spain |
Pedro Solana
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Director, Finance and Accounting, Teekay Spain |
|
|
* |
Member of Audit Committee and Conflicts Committee. |
|
|
|
Member of Corporate Governance Committee. |
Certain biographical information about each of these individuals
is set forth below.
C. Sean Day has served as Chairman of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since it was formed in November 2004. Mr. Day has
served as Chairman of Teekay Shipping Corporations board
of directors since 1999. From 1989 to 1999, he was President and
Chief Executive Officer of Navios Corporation, a large bulk
shipping company based in Stamford, Connecticut. Prior to this,
Mr. Day held a number of senior management positions in the
shipping and finance industry. He is currently serving as a
director of Kirby Corporation. Mr. Day also serves as the
Chairman of Resolute Investments, Inc., the largest stockholder
of Teekay Shipping Corporation.
Bjorn Moller has served as the Vice Chairman and a
Director of Teekay GP L.L.C. since it was formed in November
2004. Mr. Moller is the President and Chief Executive
Officer and a director of Teekay Shipping Corporation and has
held those positions since April 1998. Mr. Moller has over
25 years experience in the shipping industry and has
served in senior management positions with Teekay Shipping
133
Corporation for more than 20 years. He has headed its
overall operations since January 1997, following his promotion
to the position of Chief Operating Officer. Prior to this,
Mr. Moller headed Teekay Shipping Corporations global
chartering operations and business development activities.
Peter Evensen has served as the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of Teekay GP L.L.C. since it was
formed in November 2004 and as a Director of Teekay GP L.L.C.
since January 2005. Mr. Evensen is also the Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Teekay Shipping
Corporation. He joined Teekay Shipping Corporation in May 2003
as Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer.
He was appointed to his current positions with Teekay Shipping
Corporation in February 2004. Mr. Evensen has over
20 years experience in banking and shipping finance.
Prior to joining Teekay Shipping Corporation, Mr. Evensen
was Managing Director and Head of Global Shipping at
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and worked in other senior
positions for its predecessor firms. His international industry
experience includes positions in New York, London and Oslo.
Robert E. Boyd has served as a Director of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since January 2005. From May 1999 until his retirement in
March 2004, Mr. Boyd was employed as the Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Teknion Corporation, a
company engaged in the design, manufacture and marketing of
office systems and office furniture products. From 1991 to 1999,
Mr. Boyd was employed by The Oshawa Group Limited, a
company engaged in the wholesale and retail distribution of food
products and real estate activities, where his positions
included Executive Vice President-Financial and Chief Financial
Officer.
Ida Jane Hinkley has served as a Director of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since January 2005. From 1998 to 2001, she served as
Managing Director of Navion Shipping AS, a shipping company at
that time affiliated with the Norwegian state-owned oil company
Statoil ASA (and subsequently acquired by Teekay Shipping
Corporation in 2003). From 1980 to 1997, Ms. Hinkley was
employed by the Gotaas-Larsen Shipping Corporation, an
international provider of marine transportation services for
crude oil and gas (including LNG), serving as its Chief
Financial Officer from 1988 to 1992 and its Managing Director
from 1993 to 1997.
Ihab J.M. Massoud has served as a Director of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since January 2005. Since 1998, he has been President of
The Compass Group International LLC, a private equity investment
firm based in Westport, Connecticut and an affiliate of Teekay
Shipping Corporation. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Massoud was
employed by Petroleum Heat and Power, Inc. as a Vice President.
From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Massoud was a Vice President of
Colony Capital, Inc., a Los Angeles-based private equity firm
specializing in acquiring distressed real estate and corporate
assets.
George Watson has served as a Director of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since January 2005. Since July 2002, he has served as
Chief Executive Officer of CriticalControl Solutions Inc.
(formerly WNS Emergent), a provider of information control
applications for the energy sector. From February 2000 to July
2002, he served as Executive Chairman at VerticalBuilder.com
Inc. Mr. Watson served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. from 1993 to 1999 and as
its Chief Financial Officer from 1990 to 1993.
Bruce C. Bell has served as the Secretary of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since it was formed in November 2004. Since March 1994,
Mr. Bell has been employed as the Managing Director of
Oceanic Bank and Trust Limited, a Bahamian bank and trust
company and in August 2005 he was appointed Chairman. Prior to
joining Oceanic Bank and Trust, Mr. Bell was engaged in the
private practice of law in Canada, specializing in
corporate/commercial, banking and international business
transactions. From May 2000 until May 2003, Mr. Bell served
as the Corporate Secretary of Teekay Shipping Corporation.
Mr. Bell is also a director of Teekay Shipping Corporation.
Andres Luna has served as the Managing Director of Teekay
Spain since April 2004. Mr. Luna joined Alta Shipping,
S.A., a former affiliate company of Naviera F. Tapias S.A., in
September 1992 and served as its General Manager until he was
appointed Commercial General Manager of Naviera F. Tapias S.A.
in December 1999. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of
Naviera F. Tapias S.A. from July
134
2000 until its acquisition by Teekay Shipping Corporation in
April 2004, when it was renamed Teekay Spain.
Mr. Lunas responsibilities with Teekay Spain have
included business development, newbuilding contracting, project
management, development of its LNG business and the renewal of
its tanker fleet. He has been in the shipping business since his
graduation as a naval architect from Madrid University in 1981.
Pedro Solana has served as the Director, Finance and
Accounting of Teekay Spain since August 2004. Mr. Solana
joined Naviera F. Tapias S.A. in 1991 and served as Deputy
Financial Manager until its acquisition by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. Mr. Solanas responsibilities with Teekay
Spain have included oversight of its accounting department and
arranging for financing of its LNG carriers and crude oil
tankers. He has been in the shipping business since 1980.
Officers of Teekay LNG Projects Ltd.
The following table provides information about the officers of
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation. As described above, Teekay LNG
Projects Ltd. provides certain LNG strategic consulting and
advisory services to Teekay Spain and certain of our other
operating subsidiaries pursuant to services agreements and
pursues LNG projects on behalf of Teekay Shipping Corporation,
which are offered to us pursuant to the omnibus agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
David Glendinning
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
President |
|
Kenneth Hvid
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President |
|
Roy E. Spires
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
Vice President, Finance |
|
David Glendinning has served as the President of Teekay
LNG Projects Ltd. since it was formed in November 2004.
Mr. Glendinning is also the President of Teekay Shipping
Corporations Teekay Gas and Offshore division, and has
held this position since November 2003. Since joining Teekay
Shipping Corporation, Mr. Glendinning has worked in a
number of other senior positions with Teekay Shipping
Corporation, including Vice President, Marine and Commercial
Operations from January 1995 until his promotion to Senior Vice
President, Customer Relations and Marine Project Development in
February 1999. Prior to joining Teekay Shipping Corporation,
Mr. Glendinning, who is a Master Mariner, had
18 years sea service on oil tankers of various types
and sizes.
Kenneth Hvid has served as Senior Vice President for
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. since it was formed in November 2004.
Mr. Hvid is also Senior Vice President, Gas Services of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, a position he has held since
January 2004. Mr. Hvid joined Teekay Shipping Corporation
in October 2000, and was responsible for its purchasing
activities as Director, Procurement until he was promoted to his
current position. Prior to joining Teekay Shipping Corporation,
Mr. Hvid worked for 12 years for A.P. Moller in
various functions in Copenhagen, San Francisco and Hong
Kong.
Roy E. Spires has served as Vice President, Finance of
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. since it was formed in November 2004.
Mr. Spires has served as Teekay Shipping Corporations
Vice President, Finance from February 2004 until the closing of
this offering. He also served as Teekay Shipping
Corporations Director of Finance from November 1999 until
February 2004. Prior to joining Teekay Shipping Corporation,
Mr. Spires spent seven years with a publicly traded
Canadian corporation, where his positions included Treasurer and
Corporate Secretary. His experience includes over 17 years
of management positions in commercial and corporate banking.
Reimbursement of Expenses of Our General Partner
Our general partner does not receive any management fee or other
compensation for managing us. Our general partner and its other
affiliates are reimbursed for expenses incurred on our behalf.
These expenses include all expenses necessary or appropriate for
the conduct of our business and allocable to us, as determined
by our general partner.
135
Executive Compensation
We and our general partner were formed in November 2004. Our
general partner neither paid any compensation to its directors
or officers nor accrued any obligations with respect to
management incentive or retirement benefits for the directors
and officers prior to our initial public offering. Because the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our
general partner, Peter Evensen, is an employee of Teekay
Shipping Corporation, his compensation (other than any awards
under the long-term incentive plan described below) is set and
paid by Teekay Shipping Corporation, and we reimburse Teekay
Shipping Corporation for time he spends on partnership matters.
Our general partner compensates Bruce Bell for time he spends on
partnership matters and may grant Mr. Bell awards under the
long-term incentive plan described below. The corporate
governance committee of the board of directors of our general
partner establishes the compensation for certain key employees
of our operating subsidiary Teekay Spain. Officers and employees
of our general partner or its affiliates may participate in
employee benefit plans and arrangements sponsored by Teekay
Shipping Corporation, our general partner or their affiliates,
including plans that may be established in the future.
Compensation of Directors
Officers of our general partner or Teekay Shipping Corporation
who also serve as directors of our general partner do not
receive additional compensation for their service as directors.
Each non-management director receives compensation for attending
meetings of the board of directors, as well as committee
meetings. Non-management directors receive a director fee of
$30,000 per year and 700 common units subject to
vesting over a three-year period. Members of the audit and
conflicts committees each receive a committee fee of
$5,000 per year, and the chair of the audit committee
receives an additional fee of $5,000 for serving in that role.
In addition, each director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket
expenses in connection with attending meetings of the board of
directors or committees. Each director is fully indemnified by
us for actions associated with being a director to the extent
permitted under Marshall Islands law.
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Our general partner has adopted the Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan for employees and directors of and
consultants to our general partner and employees and directors
of and consultants to its affiliates, who perform services for
us. The plan provides for the award of restricted units, phantom
units, unit options, unit appreciation rights and other unit or
cash-based awards.
Administration. The plan is administered by the
corporate governance committee of the board of directors of our
general partner. To the extent permitted by law, the corporate
governance committee may delegate any or all of its powers and
duties under the plan to the chief executive officer of our
general partner, subject to any limitations imposed by the
corporate governance committee and certain other limitations
imposed by the plan. The corporate governance committee has the
authority to, among other things, designate participants under
the plan, determine the type or types of awards to be granted to
a participant, determine the number of common units to be
covered by awards, determine the terms and conditions applicable
to awards and interpret and administer the plan.
Number of Common Units. Subject to adjustment in
the event of any distribution, recapitalization, split, merger,
consolidation and the like, the number of common units available
for delivery pursuant to awards granted under the plan is
1,000,000. There is no limit on the number of awards that may be
granted and paid in cash. If any award is forfeited or otherwise
terminates or is cancelled without delivery of common units,
those units will again by available for grant under the plan.
Common units delivered under the plan will consist of units
acquired by our general partner on the open market, from us or
from any other person or entity.
136
Restricted Units and Phantom Units. A restricted
unit is a common unit subject to forfeiture prior to the vesting
of the award. A phantom unit is a notional unit that entitles
the grantee to receive a common unit upon the vesting of the
phantom unit or, in the discretion of the corporate governance
committee, cash equivalent to the value of a common unit. The
corporate governance committee may determine to make grants
under the plan of restricted units and phantom units to plan
participants containing such terms as the corporate governance
committee may determine. The corporate governance committee
determines the period over which restricted units and phantom
units granted to plan participants will vest. The committee may
base its determination upon the achievement of specified
performance goals. The corporate governance committee, in its
discretion, may provide tandem vesting with respect to
distributions on restricted units and may grant tandem
distribution equivalent rights with respect to phantom units.
Unit Options and Unit Appreciation Rights. The
plan permits the grant of options covering common units and the
grant of unit appreciation rights. A unit appreciation right is
an award that, upon exercise, entitles the participant to
receive the excess of the fair market value of a unit on the
exercise date over the base price established for the unit
appreciation right. Such excess may be paid in common units,
cash, or a combination thereof, as determined by the corporate
governance committee in its discretion. The corporate governance
committee is able to make grants of unit options and unit
appreciation rights under the plan to employees, consultants and
directors containing such terms as the committee may determine.
Unit options and unit appreciation rights may have an exercise
price or base price that is no less than the fair market value
of the common units on the date of grant. In general, unit
options and unit appreciation rights granted will become
exercisable over a period determined by the corporate governance
committee.
Other Unit or Cash-Based Awards. Subject to the
terms of the plan and such other terms and conditions as the
corporate governance committee deems appropriate, the corporate
governance committee may grant other incentives payable in cash
or in common units under the plan.
Vesting, Exercisability and Payment of Options.
Unless otherwise provided in the instrument evidencing an
option, (a) in the event of a participants
termination of service for any reason other than cause, death,
disability or retirement, the participant may exercise any
vested options for a period of three months from the date of
such termination, (b) in the event of a participants
termination of service due to retirement or disability, the
participant may exercise any vested options for a period of five
years from the date of such termination and (c) in the
event of a participants termination of service due to
death, the participants beneficiary may exercise any
vested options for a period of two years from the date of such
termination. In the event a participant dies after termination
of service but while the option is otherwise exercisable, the
participants beneficiary may exercise vested stock options
for a period of two years from the date of death, unless the
corporate governance committee determines otherwise. If a
participant is terminated for cause, his or her option will
automatically expire, unless the corporate governance committee
determines otherwise. In no event may an option be exercised
after the expiration of the term provided in the instrument
evidencing the option.
Change of Control. Unless otherwise provided in
the instrument evidencing the award, in the event of a change of
control of Teekay LNG Partners L.P., our general partner or
Teekay Shipping Corporation, all outstanding awards will become
fully and immediately exercisable and all applicable deferral
and restriction limitations will lapse, unless the awards are
converted, assumed or replaced by the successor company.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to options and unit
appreciation rights, the corporate governance committee may
instead provide for the cash-out of such awards in connection
with the change of control transaction. Also notwithstanding the
foregoing, if so determined by the corporate governance
committee, during the 60-day period from and after the change of
control transaction, a participant holding an option or unit
appreciation right will have the right to elect to surrender all
or part of the option or unit appreciation right in exchange for
a cash payment. If following a change of control transaction, a
participants service is terminated for cause or good
reason within 24 months of the transaction, any awards held
by that participant that remain unvested will become fully and
immediately exercisable, all applicable deferral and restriction
limitations will lapse and an award that is an option or unit
appreciation
137
right will remain exercisable until the later of five years
after the date of termination and the date the award would have
expired by its terms if the participants service had not
terminated.
Term, Termination and Amendment of Plan. Our
general partners board of directors, or its corporate
governance committee, in its discretion may terminate, suspend
or discontinue the plan at any time with respect to any award
that has not yet been granted. Our general partners board
of directors, or its corporate governance committee, also has
the right to alter or amend the plan or any part of the plan
from time to time, including increasing the number of common
units that may be granted subject to unitholder approval as
required by the exchange upon which the common units are listed
at that time. However, other than adjustments to outstanding
awards upon the occurrence of certain unusual or nonrecurring
events, no change in any outstanding grant may be made that
would materially impair the rights of the participant without
the consent of the participant.
138
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of units
of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. that, as of November 1, 2005,
is held by beneficial owners of 5% or more of the units and by
all directors and executive officers of our general partner and
by our key employees, as a group. This table is based on
information supplied by directors, executive officers and key
employees and any Schedules 13D or 13G filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and does not give effect to this
offering or related transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
Total Common | |
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Subordinated | |
|
Subordinated | |
|
and Subordinated | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Units | |
|
Units | |
|
Units | |
|
Units | |
|
|
Units Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Teekay Shipping Corporation
(1)
|
|
|
8,734,572 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
% |
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
77.3 |
% |
All executive officers, key employees and directors as a group
(10 persons)(2)(3)
|
|
|
506,372 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Excludes the 2% general partner interest held by our general
partner, a wholly owned subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation. |
|
|
(2) |
Excludes units owned by Teekay Shipping Corporation, on the
board of which serve the directors of our general partner, C.
Sean Day and Bjorn Moller. In addition, Mr. Moller is
Teekay Shipping Corporations President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Peter Evensen, our general partners Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and director, is
Teekay Shipping Corporations Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Day also serves as a director
and as the Chairman of Teekay Shipping Corporations
largest stockholder. |
|
|
|
(3) |
Subject to Note 2 above, each of these individuals
beneficially owns less than one percent of our outstanding
common units. |
|
139
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
After this offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation, the owner of
our general partner, will own 8,734,572 common units and
14,734,572 subordinated units, representing a 66.9% limited
partner interest in us. In addition, our general partner will
own a 2% general partner interest in us.
Distributions and Payments to the General Partner and Its
Affiliates
Our general partner does not receive a management fee or other
compensation for the management of our partnership. Our general
partner and its other affiliates are entitled to reimbursement
for all direct and indirect expenses they incur on our behalf.
In addition, we and certain of our operating subsidiaries pay
fees to certain subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation for
strategic consulting, advisory, ship management, technical and
administrative services. We may also pay Teekay Shipping
Corporation incentive fees to reward and motivate it
for pursuing LNG projects that we may have the right to engage
in pursuant to the omnibus agreement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation. Our general partner determines the amount of these
reimbursable expenses and negotiates these fees.
Omnibus Agreement
We have entered into an omnibus agreement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation, our general partner, and our operating company,
Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. The following discussion describes
provisions of the omnibus agreement.
Under the omnibus agreement, Teekay Shipping Corporation has
agreed, and has caused its controlled affiliates (other than us,
our general partner and our subsidiaries) to agree, not to own,
operate or charter LNG carriers. This restriction does not
prevent Teekay Shipping Corporation or any of its controlled
affiliates (other than us and our subsidiaries) from:
|
|
|
|
|
acquiring LNG carriers and related time charters as part of a
business and operating or chartering those vessels if a majority
of the value of the total assets or business acquired is not
attributable to the LNG carriers and related time charters, as
determined in good faith by the board of directors of Teekay
Shipping Corporation; however, if at any time Teekay Shipping
Corporation completes such an acquisition, it must offer to sell
the LNG carriers and related time charters to us for their fair
market value plus any additional tax or other similar costs to
Teekay Shipping Corporation that would be required to transfer
the LNG carriers and time charters to us separately from the
acquired business; |
|
|
|
owning, operating or chartering LNG carriers that relate to a
bid or award for a proposed LNG project that Teekay or any of
its subsidiaries has submitted or hereafter submits or receives;
however, at least 180 days prior to the scheduled delivery
date of any such LNG carrier, Teekay Shipping Corporation must
offer to sell the LNG carrier and related time charter to us,
with the vessel valued at its fully-built-up cost,
which represents the aggregate expenditures incurred (or to be
incurred prior to delivery to us) by Teekay Shipping Corporation
to acquire or construct and bring such LNG carrier to the
condition and location necessary for our intended use; |
|
|
|
owning, operating or chartering LNG carriers subject to the
offers to us described in the preceding two paragraphs pending
our determination whether to accept such offers and pending the
closing of any offers we accept; |
|
|
|
acquiring, operating or chartering LNG carriers if our general
partner has previously advised Teekay Shipping Corporation that
the board of directors of our general partner has elected, with
the approval of its conflicts committee, not to cause us or our
subsidiaries to acquire or operate the carriers; |
140
|
|
|
|
|
owning or operating any of the three RasGas II LNG
newbuilding carriers and related time charters if we fail to
perform our obligation to purchase such vessels under our
agreement with Teekay Shipping Corporation (please read
Agreement to Purchase RasGas II
Interest); |
|
|
|
acquiring up to a 9.9% equity ownership, voting or profit
participation interest in any publicly traded company that owns
or operates LNG carriers; or |
|
|
|
providing ship management services relating to LNG carriers. |
If Teekay Shipping Corporation or any of its controlled
affiliates (other than us or our subsidiaries) owns, operates or
charters LNG carriers pursuant to any of the exceptions
described above, it may not subsequently expand that portion of
its business other than pursuant to those exceptions.
The omnibus agreement also permits us to pay to Teekay Shipping
Corporation any incentive fees approved by the
conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general
partner, in its sole discretion and relating to LNG projects
provided to us by Teekay Shipping Corporation. Although the
timing and amount of and criteria for any such discretionary
incentive fees are not set forth in the omnibus agreement, any
such fee would be intended to reward Teekay Shipping Corporation
for obtaining, and to further motivate it in pursuing
additional, LNG projects.
In addition, under the omnibus agreement we have agreed, and
have caused our subsidiaries to agree, not to own, operate or
charter crude oil tankers. This restriction does not:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
apply to any oil tankers owned, operated or chartered by us or
any of our subsidiaries as of the closing of this offering
(including the three Suezmax tankers to be acquired by us from
Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of this offering),
and the ownership, operation or chartering of any oil tankers
that replace any of those oil tankers (or Replacement Oil
Tankers) in connection with: |
|
|
|
|
|
the destruction or total loss of the original tanker; the tanker
being damaged to an extent that makes repairing it uneconomical
or renders it permanently unfit for normal use, as determined in
good faith by our general partner within 90 days after the
occurrence of the damage; or the tankers condemnation,
confiscation, requisition or a similar taking of title to or use
of it that continues for at least six months; or |
|
|
|
the replacement of a time charter existing on the closing of
this offering, where the tanker that was subject to the charter
has been sold or transferred due to the exercise by the customer
of its right under the charter to cause the sale or transfer; |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
prevent us or any of our subsidiaries from: |
|
|
|
|
|
acquiring oil tankers and any related time charters as part of a
business and operating or chartering those vessels, if a
majority of the value of the total assets or business acquired
is not attributable to the oil tankers and any related charters,
as determined by the conflicts committee of our general
partners board of directors; however, if at any time we
complete such an acquisition, we are required to promptly offer
to sell the oil tankers and time charters to Teekay Shipping
Corporation for fair market value plus any additional tax or
other similar costs to us that would be required to transfer the
oil tankers and time charters to Teekay Shipping Corporation
separately from the acquired business; |
|
|
|
owning, operating or chartering crude oil tankers subject to the
offer to Teekay Shipping Corporation described in the preceding
paragraph pending its determination whether to accept such offer
and pending the closing of any offer it accepts; |
141
|
|
|
|
|
acquiring up to a 9.9% equity ownership, voting or profit
participation interest in any publicly traded company that owns
or operates crude oil tankers; or |
|
|
|
acquiring, operating or chartering oil tankers if Teekay
Shipping Corporation has previously advised our general partner
that it has elected not to acquire or operate those tankers. |
If we or any of our subsidiaries owns, operates or charters oil
tankers pursuant to any of the exceptions described above,
neither we nor such subsidiary may subsequently expand that
portion of our business other than pursuant to those exceptions.
If Teekay Shipping Corporation or its affiliates no longer
control our general partner or there is a change of control of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, our general partner or Teekay
Shipping Corporation, respectively, may terminate the
noncompetition provisions of the omnibus agreement.
|
|
|
Rights of First Offer on Suezmax Tankers and LNG
Carriers |
Under the omnibus agreement, we and our subsidiaries will grant
to Teekay Shipping Corporation a 30-day right of first offer on
any proposed (a) sale, transfer or other disposition of any
of our Suezmax tankers or (b) re-chartering of any of our
Suezmax tankers pursuant to a time charter with a term of at
least three years if the existing charter expires or is
terminated early. Likewise, Teekay Shipping Corporation has
agreed (and has caused its subsidiaries to agree) to grant a
similar right of first offer to us for any LNG carriers it might
own. These rights of first offer do not apply to (a) a
sale, transfer or other disposition of vessels between any
affiliated subsidiaries, or pursuant to the terms of any charter
or other agreement with a charter party or (b) the
re-chartering of any Replacement Oil Tanker to another charter
party that is not an affiliate of the existing charter party.
Prior to engaging in any negotiation regarding any vessel
disposition or re-chartering with a non-affiliated third-party,
the applicable party will deliver a written notice setting forth
the material terms and conditions of the proposed transaction.
During the 30-day period after the delivery of such notice, we
will negotiate in good faith with Teekay Shipping Corporation to
reach an agreement on the transaction. If we do not reach an
agreement within such 30-day period, we or Teekay Shipping
Corporation, as the case may be, will be able within the next
180 days to sell, transfer, dispose or re-charter the
vessel to a third party (or to agree in writing to undertake
such transaction with a third party) on terms generally no less
favorable to us or Teekay Shipping Corporation, as the case may
be, than those offered pursuant to the written notice.
If Teekay Shipping Corporation or its affiliates no longer
control our general partner or there is a change of control of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, our general partner or Teekay
Shipping Corporation, respectively, may terminate these rights
of first offer provisions of the omnibus agreement.
Under the omnibus agreement, Teekay Shipping Corporation will
indemnify us until May 10, 2010, against certain
environmental and toxic tort liabilities to the extent arising
prior to May 10, 2005, the closing date of our initial
public offering. Liabilities resulting from a change in law
after the closing of this offering are excluded from the
environmental indemnity. There is an aggregate cap of
$10.0 million on the amount of indemnity coverage provided
by Teekay Shipping Corporation for these environmental and toxic
tort liabilities.
Teekay Shipping Corporation will also indemnify us for
liabilities related to:
|
|
|
|
|
certain defects in title to the assets contributed to us and any
failure to obtain, prior to the closing of this offering,
certain consents and permits necessary to conduct our business,
which liabilities arise within two years after the closing of
this offering; and |
|
|
|
certain income tax liabilities attributable to the operation of
the assets contributed to us prior to the time they were
contributed. |
142
The omnibus agreement may not be amended without the prior
approval of the conflicts committee of the board of directors of
our general partner if the proposed amendment will, in the
reasonable discretion of our general partner, adversely affect
holders of our common units.
Advisory and Administrative Services Agreements
|
|
|
Administrative Services Agreement Between Us and Teekay
Shipping Limited |
We have entered into a services agreement with Teekay Shipping
Limited, a Bahamian corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, pursuant to which Teekay Shipping
Limited provides certain non-strategic administrative services
to us, unless the provision of those services by Teekay Shipping
Limited would materially interfere with Teekay Shipping
Corporations operations. These services are to be provided
in a commercially reasonably manner and upon the reasonable
request of our general partner. Teekay Shipping Limited provides
these services to us directly but may subcontract for certain of
these services with other entities, including other Teekay
Shipping Corporation subsidiaries. We pay a reasonable,
arms-length fee to Teekay Shipping Limited for such
services that includes reimbursement of the reasonable cost of
any direct and indirect expenses it incurs in providing these
services. We will indemnify Teekay Shipping Limited for losses
it incurs in connection with providing the services, excluding
losses caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of
Teekay Shipping Limited or its employees or agents. The services
include:
|
|
|
|
|
legal, investor relations and financial compliance services; |
|
|
|
bookkeeping and accounting services; and |
|
|
|
banking and finance services. |
|
|
|
Advisory, Technical and Administrative Services Agreements
Between Certain of Our Operating Subsidiaries and Teekay
Shipping Limited |
Our operating subsidiary Teekay Spain has entered into an
Advisory, Technical and Administrative Services Agreement with
Teekay Shipping Limited, pursuant to which Teekay Shipping
Limited provides advisory, technical and administrative services
that supplement the existing capabilities of Teekay Spains
employees. These services are to be provided in a commercially
reasonably manner and upon the reasonable request of Teekay
Spain. Teekay Shipping Limited provides these services directly
but may subcontract for certain of these services with other
entities, including other Teekay Shipping Corporation
subsidiaries. Teekay Spain pays a reasonable, arms-length
fee to Teekay Shipping Limited that includes reimbursement of
the reasonable cost of any direct and indirect expenses it
incurs in providing these services, which include services such
as:
|
|
|
|
|
vessel maintenance; |
|
|
|
crewing; |
|
|
|
purchasing; |
|
|
|
shipyard supervision; |
|
|
|
insurance; and |
|
|
|
financial services. |
We anticipate that similar contracts will be entered into with
Teekay Shipping Limited as we establish other operating
subsidiaries as part of our business, including the entities
that will operate the RasGas II vessels described below
under Agreement to Purchase RasGas II
Interest.
143
|
|
|
LNG Strategic Consulting and Advisory Services Agreement
Between Certain of Our Operating Subsidiaries and Teekay LNG
Projects Ltd. |
Our operating subsidiary Teekay Spain has entered into a
services agreement with Teekay LNG Projects Ltd., a Canadian
corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation, pursuant to which Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. provides
to Teekay Spain strategic consulting and advisory services
relating to our LNG business, unless the provision of those
services by Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. would materially interfere
with Teekay Shipping Corporations operations. These
services are to be provided in a commercially reasonably manner
and upon the reasonable request of Teekay Spain. Information
about the officers of Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. who provide
services to Teekay Spain is included above under
Management Officers of Teekay LNG Projects
Ltd. Teekay Spain pays a reasonable, arms-length fee
for these services that includes reimbursement of the reasonable
cost to Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. of any direct and indirect
expenses it incurs in providing the services. Services that
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. provide include advice and assistance
regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
strategic planning; |
|
|
|
business development opportunities; |
|
|
|
integration of any acquired businesses; |
|
|
|
client relations; and |
|
|
|
any other matters relating to the business of Teekay
Spains LNG business that Teekay Spain may request
assistance with, to the extent Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. has
knowledge or experience related to such matters. |
We anticipate that as we establish certain other LNG operating
subsidiaries as part of our business they will seek to enter
into similar agreements with Teekay LNG Projects Ltd.
Agreement to Purchase Suezmax Tankers and Time Charters
We have entered into an agreement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation to purchase, upon the closing of this offering and
for an aggregate price of $180 million:
|
|
|
|
|
its 100% ownership interests in three ship-owning
subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
an aggregate of $137.5 million of demand notes receivable
that will be owing from these subsidiaries to Teekay Shipping
Corporation. After the acquisition, the notes receivable will be
intercompany receivables owing from the subsidiaries to us and
will be eliminated in our consolidated results. |
We will pay the purchase price with the net proceeds of this
offering and borrowings from our existing $100 million
credit facility, cash balances or a combination of both.
The ship-owning subsidiaries own three double-hulled Suezmax
tankers (the African Spirit, the Asian Spirit and
the European Spirit) and the related long-term,
fixed-rate time charters with ConocoPhillips Shipping L.L.C., a
wholly owned subsidiary of ConocoPhillips. The vessels have an
average age of two years and the time charters have an average
remaining scheduled term of approximately 10 years, with
options, exercisable by the customer, to extend up to an
additional six years. The time charters are subject to
termination and vessel sale and purchase rights. Please read
Business Crude Oil Time Charters
Rights to Terminate Charters or Cause Sale of Vessel. If
ConocoPhillips declines to exercise this option, we have granted
Teekay Shipping Corporation the right to charter the vessels for
up to six years under the same pricing terms and conditions as
those in the time charters with ConocoPhillips. While the
vessels are under charter to ConocoPhillips, Teekay Shipping
Corporation will manage their operation pursuant to existing
ship management agreements.
The notes receivable we will acquire from Teekay Shipping
Corporation will evidence loans made by it to the ship-owning
subsidiaries prior to this offering to permit them to pay
existing indebtedness secured
144
by mortgages on the three vessels. This will allow the vessels
to be transferred to us unencumbered. The notes receivable will
bear interest at 7.065% annually.
Following the closing of this offering, we anticipate entering
into a $137.5 million credit facility, which will be
modified from an existing facility of Teekay Shipping
Corporation relating to the three Suezmax tankers we will
acquire upon the closing of this offering. Our obligations under
the credit facility will be secured by, among other things,
mortgages on the three Suezmax tankers we will acquire and the
related time charters. Upon our entering into the new facility,
we will reimburse Teekay Shipping Corporation approximately
$627,000 for its unamortized loan costs under the existing
facility. Please read Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Credit Facilities.
Joint Venture with an Entity Controlled by Mr. Fernando
Tapias
Teekay Shipping Corporation and F. Tapias Grupo de Sociedades e
Inversiones, S.L. (or Tapias Grupo), an entity controlled
by Fernando Tapias, the former controlling shareholder of
Tapias, formed a joint venture (or the Teekay Joint
Venture) when Teekay Shipping Corporation acquired Tapias in
April 2004. The primary purpose of the joint venture is to
provide marine transportation of oil and gas. As part of the
joint venture, each partner has agreed that it will give the
joint venture the first opportunity to pursue any new oil or gas
marine transportation opportunities that become available to
such partner and relate only to the Spanish market or are led by
Spanish entities or entities controlled by a Spanish company. If
the joint ventures board of directors which is
composed of an equal number of designees of each
partner determines not to pursue such an
opportunity, then the partner proposing the opportunity may
pursue it independently of the joint venture. Prior to
Teekays acquisition of Tapias, Mr. Tapias had been
involved in the energy marine transportation industry through
Spanish companies since 1991, and he has established many
relationships in that market.
The Teekay Joint Venture provides that Teekay Shipping
Corporation may offer to us its interest in any LNG marine
transportation opportunity the joint venture elects to pursue.
In that case, we will enter into a joint venture agreement with
Tapias Grupo in respect of the LNG opportunity, which agreement
will be based on the existing Teekay Joint Venture agreement,
with appropriate modifications. Pursuant to the omnibus
agreement referred to above, Teekay Shipping Corporation will
offer these opportunities to us, subject to the exceptions set
forth in the omnibus agreement.
Teekay Spain will operate any LNG carriers acquired by the joint
venture between Tapias Grupo and us. We and Tapias Grupo will
share profits and losses of the joint venture in proportion to
the partners relative capital contributions. Each partner
will have equal voting power. The joint venture agreement
provides for a right of first refusal to the partners if either
partner seeks to transfer its joint venture interest. If one of
the partners materially breaches the joint venture agreement and
fails to cure the breach, the other partner may purchase the
breaching partners joint venture interest at a 20%
discount.
Granada Spirit Charter and Purchase Agreement
The Granada Spirit is a single-hulled tanker that was
built in 1990 and acquired by Tapias. The Granada Spirit
operated in the spot market. In the fourth quarter of 2004,
the vessel was transferred to another subsidiary of Teekay
Shipping Corporation not organized in Spain in connection with a
significant drydocking and re-flagging the vessel.
At the closing of our initial public offering, Teekay Shipping
Corporation contributed to us the Granada Spirit to
provide interim cash flows to us until delivery of our Suezmax
newbuilding, the Toledo Spirit, and entered into a
short-term, fixed-rate time charter to increase the
predictability and stability of that cash flow compared to the
Granada Spirits prior operation in the spot market.
On May 26, 2005 and pursuant to the terms of the time
charter contract, Teekay Shipping Corporation terminated the
charter and purchased the Granada Spirit from us for
$20.6 million. We agreed to sell the Granada Spirit
to Teekay Shipping Corporation because it is not a
double-hulled vessel subject to a long-term time charter,
145
as are the other vessels in our fleet, and because its useful
life as a single-hulled tanker is substantially diminished by
IMO requirements that will require its phase-out.
Agreement to Purchase RasGas II Interest
We have entered into a purchase agreement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation pursuant to which it has agreed to sell to us its
100% ownership interest in Teekay Nakilat Holdings Corporation
(or Teekay Nakilat Holdings). Teekay Nakilat Holdings
owns 70% of Teekay Nakilat Corporation (or Teekay
Nakilat), which in turn owns three subsidiaries, each of
which has contracted to have built one of the RasGas II LNG
newbuildings. Qatar Gas Transport Company Ltd. (Nakilat) owns
the remaining 30% of Teekay Nakilat. The three LNG newbuilding
carriers are subject to 20-year, fixed-rate time charters to
RasGas II, which time charters will commence upon
commercial operation of the vessels, scheduled for various times
during the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first half of 2007. We
will purchase Teekay Shipping Corporations interest in
Teekay Nakilat Holdings at approximately the time of the
delivery of the first newbuilding. This warehousing
arrangement with Teekay Shipping Corporation allows us to defer
our need to finance these vessels until closer to the time they
commence operations, which will reduce our need to finance
construction installment payments.
Our aggregate purchase price for Teekay Shipping
Corporations interest in Teekay Nakilat will reimburse
Teekay Shipping Corporation for its costs related to the
construction and delivery of the three RasGas II vessels
and compensate it for its cost of capital on construction
payments made to the shipyard, and will include our assumption
via Teekay Nakilat of 70% of the indebtedness financing the
vessels and the remaining construction installment payments for
the remaining two vessels.
Teekay Shipping Corporation will provide all capital required to
finance the construction of the three RasGas II vessels
until our purchase of Teekay Nakilat Holdings. The total price
payable to the shipyard for each vessel is approximately
$171.5 million, payable in five equal installments of
approximately $34.3 million each. Teekay Shipping
Corporation has paid the first three installments on one vessel
and the first two installments on two vessels. Remaining
installments are due at varying times for each vessel from
December 2005 until April 2007. To compensate Teekay Shipping
Corporation for its cost of capital in making these installment
payments, interest will accrue and be capitalized at the rate of
8.5%, compounded annually from the date of each installment
payment until we pay Teekay Shipping Corporation the purchase
price. Based on an estimated purchase date on the scheduled
delivery date of the first newbuilding in the fourth quarter of
2006 and adjusted for payments by Qatar Gas Transport Company,
we estimate that the aggregate amount of these capitalized
financing costs will be approximately $46 million.
Costs for which we will reimburse Teekay Shipping Corporation,
or pay directly after purchasing Teekay Nakilat Holdings,
include 70% of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Depot Spares. Teekay Nakilat will purchase spare
parts for the LNG carriers during their construction periods.
These depot spares are critical replacement parts
that are purchased in advance of being required due to long
order lead times to procure these parts at a later stage.
Purchasing the spares in advance avoids or minimizes any vessel
downtime if these parts are required with little notice. Depot
spare costs are estimated to be $2.2 million per vessel. |
|
|
|
Provisions for Modifications. These costs relate
to potential vessel modifications that the customer may request
during the vessel construction period, which Teekay Nakilat
initially will fund. The estimated cost is $2.5 million per
vessel. |
|
|
|
Supervision and Management. These costs cover
Teekay Nakilats expense in supervising construction of the
vessels at the shipyard. Estimated costs are approximately
$1.3 million per vessel. |
|
|
|
Other Costs. These costs represent other
significant costs incurred by Teekay Nakilat such as vessel
start-up costs, crew training, crew supplies and flag
registration. The total of these other costs is estimated to be
$2.6 million per vessel. |
146
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Costs. Teekay Shipping Corporation has
arranged for long-term financing for the three RasGas II
vessels, which are obligations of the ship owning subsidiaries
of Teekay Nakilat, and currently are guaranteed by Teekay
Shipping Corporation. To the extent Teekay Shipping Corporation
or Teekay Nakilat pays the closing costs relating to this
financing, we will reimburse 70% of those costs. Closing costs
for this financing are estimated to be $2.0 million per
vessel. |
Our 70% responsibility for the total cost for the three vessels,
including shipyard payments, the capitalized financing cost and
the other costs described above, is estimated to be
approximately $420.5 million. Long-term vessel financing
will cover approximately $327.7 million of this amount. We
will be required to fund the remaining approximately
$92.8 million of the purchase price for Teekay Shipping
Corporations interest in Teekay Nakilat. We anticipate
that Teekay Shipping Corporation will complete U.K. lease
arrangements to finance these vessels. We estimate that these
lease arrangements would increase our financial returns from the
RasGas II project by reducing our equity contribution
required for the vessels by approximately $40 million from
the current estimate of $92.8 million, while only reducing
the annual EBITDA attributable to the project by approximately
3%. Teekay Shipping Corporation may be unable to complete these
lease arrangements. For additional information about these
potential U.K. leases, please read Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Ship Financing Arrangements
U.K. Lease Arrangements.
An initial installment equal to 90% of the estimated purchase
price will be payable upon delivery of the first vessel, with
the balance due within 90 days of delivery of the third
vessel. Payments will be made in either cash or our common
units, at Teekay Shipping Corporations election made at
least 90 days prior to payment thereof, or such other
consideration as agreed between Teekay Shipping Corporation and
the conflicts committee of our general partners board of
directors. Payments in our common units will be valued at their
average closing price during the 10-trading day period
immediately preceding the payment or, if lower, their price per
share to the public in any offering undertaken by us to
partially finance our purchase.
Agreement Relating to Toledo Spirit
Our Suezmax tanker the Toledo Spirit, which was delivered
in July 2005, operates pursuant to a time charter that has a
component to increase or decrease the fixed rate established in
the charter, depending upon the spot charter rates that we would
have earned had we traded the vessel in the spot tanker market.
To increase the consistency of our revenue stream from this
charter, we entered into an agreement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation that effectively eliminates the effects of this
variable component of the charter arrangement. Pursuant to the
agreement, (a) Teekay Shipping Corporation pays, or
reimburses us for, amounts payable to the charter party as a
result of spot rates being below the fixed rate and (b) we
pay, or cause payment to be made to, Teekay Shipping Corporation
for amounts payable to us as a result of spot rates being in
excess of the fixed rate.
Sale of Suezmax Newbuilding
In March 2005, we completed a sale of a Suezmax newbuilding to
Teekay Shipping Corporation for $70.0 million, what we
believe was the tankers approximate fair market value. We
paid $48.6 million for the construction of the tanker,
which was delivered in March 2004, and agreed to the sale in
October 2004.
Directors and Officers of Our General Partner and Key
Employees
Teekay Shipping Corporation owns and controls our general
partner and owns a majority of our outstanding units. The
Chairman of our general partner, C. Sean Day, is a director
and the Chairman of Resolute Investments, Inc., the largest
stockholder of Teekay Shipping Corporation. Mr. Day is also
the Chairman of Teekay Shipping Corporation and his consulting
company provides services primarily to affiliates of Teekay
Shipping Corporation. Our general partners Secretary,
Bruce C. Bell, is the Managing Director of Oceanic
Bank and Trust Limited, to which Teekay Shipping
Corporation paid approximately
147
$0.5 million in 2004 for corporate administration fees and
shared office costs. Mr. Bell is also a director of Teekay
Shipping Corporation, Teekay Nakilat Corporation and Teekay
Shipping Limited. Another director of our general partner,
Ihab J.M. Massoud, is President of The Compass Group
International LLC, a private equity investment firm affiliated
with Teekay Shipping Corporation. Bjorn Moller, the Vice
Chairman and a member of our general partners board of
directors, is the President and Chief Executive Officer and a
director of Teekay Shipping Corporation. Peter Evensen, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and a
director of our general partner, is the Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Teekay Shipping Corporation.
Until November 2004, Andres Luna, the Managing Director of
Teekay Spain, was a stockholder of Alta Shipping S.A., a former
affiliate of Teekay Spain and currently an affiliate of Teekay
Shipping Corporation. In each of 2002, 2003 and 2004, Teekay
Spain paid ship brokerage commissions to Alta Shipping S.A.
relating to Suezmax tanker time charters in amounts totaling no
more than 1.0 million Euros ($1.26 million).
148
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND FIDUCIARY DUTIES
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of interest exist and may arise in the future as a
result of the relationships between our general partner and its
affiliates, including Teekay Shipping Corporation, on the one
hand, and us and our unaffiliated limited partners, on the other
hand. The directors and officers of our general partner, Teekay
GP L.L.C., have certain fiduciary duties to manage our general
partner in a manner beneficial to its owners. At the same time,
our general partner has a fiduciary duty to manage us in a
manner beneficial to us and our unitholders.
Our partnership affairs are governed by our partnership
agreement and the Marshall Islands Act. The provisions of the
Marshall Islands Act resemble provisions of the limited
partnership laws of a number of states in the United States,
most notably Delaware. We are not aware of any material
difference in unitholder rights between the Marshall Islands Act
and the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. The
Marshall Islands Act also provides that it is to be interpreted
according to the non-statutory law of the State of Delaware.
There have been, however, few, if any, court cases in the
Marshall Islands interpreting the Marshall Islands Act, in
contrast to Delaware, which has a fairly well-developed body of
case law interpreting its limited partnership statute.
Accordingly, we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts
would reach the same conclusions as courts in Delaware. For
example, the rights of our unitholders and fiduciary
responsibilities of our general partner under Marshall Islands
law are not as clearly established as under judicial precedent
in existence in Delaware. Due to the less developed nature of
Marshall Islands law, our public unitholders may have more
difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions
by our general partner or controlling unitholders than would
unitholders of a limited partnership organized in the United
States.
Whenever a conflict arises between our general partner or its
affiliates, on the one hand, and us or any other partner, on the
other, our general partner will resolve that conflict. Our
partnership agreement contains provisions that modify and limit
our general partners fiduciary duties to the unitholders
under Marshall Islands law. Our partnership agreement also
restricts the remedies available to unitholders for actions
taken by our general partner.
Our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations
under the partnership agreement or its duties to us or the
unitholders if the resolution of the conflict is:
|
|
|
|
|
approved by the conflicts committee, although our general
partner is not obligated to seek such approval; |
|
|
|
approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common
units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner
or any of its affiliates; |
|
|
|
on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being
provided to or available from unrelated third parties, but the
general partner is not required to obtain confirmation to such
effect from an independent third party; or |
|
|
|
fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of
the relationships between the parties involved, including other
transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous
to us. |
Our general partner may, but is not required to, seek the
approval of such resolution from the conflicts committee of the
board of directors of our general partner. If our general
partner does not seek approval from the conflicts committee, and
the board of directors of our general partner determines that
the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the
conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth
in the third and fourth bullet points above, then it will be
presumed that, in making its decision, the board of directors
acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on
behalf of any limited partner or the partnership, the person
bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of
overcoming such presumption. Unless the resolution of a conflict
is specifically provided for in our partnership agreement, our
general partner or the conflicts committee may consider any
factors it
149
determines in good faith to consider when resolving a conflict.
When our partnership agreement requires someone to act in good
faith, it requires that person to reasonably believe that he is
acting in the best interests of the partnership, unless the
context otherwise requires. Please read
Management Management of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. for information about the composition and formation
of the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our
general partner.
Conflicts of interest could arise in the situations described
below, among others.
|
|
|
Actions taken by our general partner may affect the amount
of cash available for distribution to unitholders or accelerate
the right to convert subordinated units. |
The amount of cash that is available for distribution to
unitholders is affected by decisions of our general partner
regarding such matters as:
|
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of asset purchases and sales; |
|
|
|
cash expenditures; |
|
|
|
borrowings; |
|
|
|
the issuance of additional units; and |
|
|
|
the creation, reduction or increase of reserves in any quarter. |
In addition, borrowings by us and our affiliates do not
constitute a breach of any duty owed by our general partner to
our unitholders, including borrowings that have the purpose or
effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
enabling our general partner or its affiliates to receive
distributions on any subordinated units held by them or the
incentive distribution rights; or |
|
|
|
hastening the expiration of the subordination period. |
For example, in the event we have not generated sufficient cash
from our operations to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on
our common units and our subordinated units, our partnership
agreement permits us to borrow funds, which would enable us to
make this distribution on all outstanding units. Please read
Cash Distribution Policy Subordination
Period.
Our partnership agreement provides that we and our subsidiaries
may borrow funds from our general partner and its affiliates.
Our general partner and its affiliates may not borrow funds from
us, our operating company, or its operating subsidiaries.
|
|
|
We do not have any officers and rely solely on officers of
Teekay GP L.L.C. |
Affiliates of our general partner, Teekay GP L.L.C., conduct
businesses and activities of their own in which we have no
economic interest. If these separate activities are
significantly greater than our activities, there could be
material competition for the time and effort of the officers who
provide services to Teekay GP L.L.C. and its affiliates. The
officers of Teekay GP L.L.C. are not required to work full-time
on our affairs. These officers are required to devote time to
the affairs of Teekay GP L.L.C. or its affiliates, and we
reimburse their employers for the services they render to Teekay
GP L.L.C. and its subsidiaries. None of the officers of our
general partner are employees of our general partner. Our
general partners Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer is also an executive officer of Teekay
Shipping Corporation.
|
|
|
We reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for
expenses. |
We reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for costs
incurred in managing and operating us, including costs incurred
in rendering corporate staff and support services to us. Our
partnership agreement provides that our general partner
determines the expenses that are allocable to us in good faith.
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions and Management
Reimbursement of Expenses of Our General Partner.
150
|
|
|
Our general partner limits its liability regarding our
obligations. |
Our general partner limits its liability under contractual
arrangements so that the other party has recourse only to our
assets and not against our general partner or its assets or any
affiliate of our general partner or its assets. Our partnership
agreement provides that any action taken by our general partner
to limit its or our liability is not a breach of our general
partners fiduciary duties, even if we could have obtained
terms that are more favorable without the limitation on
liability.
|
|
|
Common unitholders have no right to enforce obligations of
our general partner and its affiliates under agreements with
us. |
Any agreements between us, on the one hand, and our general
partner and its affiliates, on the other, will not grant to the
unitholders, separate and apart from us, the right to enforce
the obligations of our general partner and its affiliates in our
favor.
|
|
|
Contracts between us, on the one hand, and our general
partner and its affiliates, on the other, will not be the result
of arms-length negotiations. |
Neither our partnership agreement nor any of the other
agreements, contracts and arrangements between us and our
general partner and its affiliates are or will be the result of
arms-length negotiations. Our partnership agreement
generally provides that any affiliated transaction, such as an
agreement, contract or arrangement between us and our general
partner and its affiliates, must be:
|
|
|
|
|
on terms no less favorable to us then those generally being
provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or |
|
|
|
fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the
totality of the relationships between the parties involved
(including other transactions that may be particularly favorable
or advantageous to us). |
Our general partner may also enter into additional contractual
arrangements with any of its affiliates on our behalf; however,
there is no obligation of our general partner and its affiliates
to enter into any contracts of this kind.
|
|
|
Common units are subject to our general partners
limited call right. |
Our general partner may exercise its right to call and purchase
common units as provided in the partnership agreement or assign
this right to one of its affiliates or to us. Our general
partner may use its own discretion, free of fiduciary duty
restrictions, in determining whether to exercise this right. As
a result, a common unitholder may have common units purchased
from the unitholder at an undesirable time or price. Please read
The Partnership Agreement Limited Call
Right.
|
|
|
We may not choose to retain separate counsel for ourselves
or for the holders of common units. |
The attorneys, independent accountants and others who perform
services for us have been retained by our general partner.
Attorneys, independent accountants and others who perform
services for us are selected by our general partner or the
conflicts committee and may perform services for our general
partner and its affiliates. We may retain separate counsel for
ourselves or the holders of common units in the event of a
conflict of interest between our general partner and its
affiliates, on the one hand, and us or the holders of common
units, on the other, depending on the nature of the conflict. We
do not intend to do so in most cases.
|
|
|
Our general partners affiliates may compete with
us. |
Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner will
be restricted from engaging in any business activities other
than acting as our general partner and those activities
incidental to its ownership of interests in us. In addition, our
partnership agreement provides that our general partner, for so
long as it is general partner of our partnership, will cause its
affiliates not to engage in, by acquisition or otherwise,
151
the businesses described above under the caption Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions Omnibus
Agreement Noncompetition. Similarly, under the
omnibus agreement, Teekay Shipping Corporation will agree and
will cause it affiliates to agree, for so long as Teekay
Shipping Corporation controls our partnership, not to engage in
the businesses described above under the caption Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions Omnibus
Agreement Noncompetition. Except as provided
in our partnership agreement and the omnibus agreement,
affiliates of our general partner are not prohibited from
engaging in other businesses or activities, including those that
might be in direct competition with us.
Fiduciary Duties
Our general partner is accountable to us and our unitholders as
a fiduciary. Fiduciary duties owed to unitholders by our general
partner are prescribed by law and the partnership agreement. The
Marshall Islands Act does not prohibit Marshall Islands
partnerships, in their partnership agreements, from restricting
or expanding the fiduciary duties owed by the general partner to
the limited partners and the partnership.
Our partnership agreement contains various provisions
restricting the fiduciary duties that might otherwise be owed by
our general partner. We have adopted these provisions to allow
our general partner to take into account the interests of other
parties in addition to our interests when resolving conflicts of
interest. We believe this is appropriate and necessary because
the board of directors of our general partner has fiduciary
duties to manage our general partner in a manner beneficial both
to its owner, Teekay Shipping Corporation, as well as to you.
These modifications disadvantage the common unitholders because
they restrict the rights and remedies that would otherwise be
available to unitholders for actions that, without those
limitations, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty, as
described below. The following is a summary of:
|
|
|
|
|
the fiduciary duties imposed on our general partner by the
Marshall Islands Act; |
|
|
|
material modifications of these duties contained in our
partnership agreement; and |
|
|
|
certain rights and remedies of unitholders contained in the
Marshall Islands Act. |
|
|
|
Marshall Islands law fiduciary duty standards |
|
Fiduciary duties are generally considered to include an
obligation to act in good faith and with due care and loyalty.
The duty of care, in the absence of a provision in a partnership
agreement providing otherwise, would generally require a general
partner to act for the partnership in the same manner as a
prudent person would act on his own behalf. The duty of loyalty,
in the absence of a provision in a partnership agreement
providing otherwise, would generally prohibit a general partner
of a Marshall Islands limited partnership from taking any action
or engaging in any transaction where a conflict of interest is
present. |
|
Partnership agreement modified standards |
|
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that waive or
consent to conduct by our general partner and its affiliates
that might otherwise raise issues as to compliance with
fiduciary duties under the laws of the Marshall Islands. For
example, Section 7.9 of our partnership agreement provides
that when our general partner is acting in its capacity as our
general partner, as opposed to in its individual capacity, it
must act in good faith and will not be subject to
any other standard under the laws of the Marshall Islands. In
addition, when our general partner is acting in its individual
capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as |
152
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner, it may act without any fiduciary obligation
to us or the unitholders whatsoever. These standards reduce the
obligations to which our general partner would otherwise be held. |
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement generally provides that affiliated
transactions and resolutions of conflicts of interest not
involving a vote of unitholders and that are not approved by the
conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general
partner must be: |
|
|
|
on terms no less favorable to us than those
generally being provided to or available from unrelated third
parties; or |
|
|
|
fair and reasonable to us, taking into
account the totality of the relationships between the parties
involved (including other transactions that may be particularly
favorable or advantageous to us). |
|
|
|
If our general partner does not seek approval from the conflicts
committee, and the board of directors of our general partner
determines that the resolution or course of action taken with
respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either of the
standards set forth in the bullet points above, then it will be
presumed that, in making its decision, the board of directors
acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on
behalf of any limited partner or the partnership, the person
bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of
overcoming such presumption. These standards reduce the
obligations to which our general partner would otherwise be held. |
|
Rights and remedies of unitholders |
|
In addition to the other more specific provisions limiting the
obligations of our general partner, our partnership agreement
further provides that our general partner and its officers and
directors will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our
limited partners or assignees for errors of judgment or for any
acts or omissions unless there has been a final and
non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction
determining that the general partner or its officers and
directors acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud, willful
misconduct or gross negligence. The provisions of the Marshall
Islands Act resemble the provisions of the limited partnership
act of Delaware. For example, like Delaware, the Marshall
Islands Act favors the principles of freedom of contract and
enforceability of partnership agreements and allows the
partnership agreement to contain terms governing the rights of
the unitholders. The rights of our unitholders, including voting
and approval rights and the ability of the partnership to issue
additional units, are governed by the terms of our partnership
agreement. Please read The Partnership Agreement. |
|
|
|
As to remedies of unitholders, the Marshall Islands Act permits
a limited partner to institute legal action on behalf of the
partnership to recover damages from a third party where a
general partner has refused to institute the action or where an
effort to cause a general partner to do so is not likely to
succeed. These actions include actions against a general partner
for breach of its fiduciary duties or of the partnership
agreement. |
153
In order to become one of our limited partners, a common
unitholder is required to agree to be bound by the provisions in
the partnership agreement, including the provisions discussed
above. This is in accordance with the policy of the Marshall
Islands Act favoring the principle of freedom of contract and
the enforceability of partnership agreements. The failure of a
limited partner or assignee to sign a partnership agreement does
not render the partnership agreement unenforceable against that
person.
Under the partnership agreement, we must indemnify our general
partner and its officers and directors to the fullest extent
permitted by law, against liabilities, costs and expenses
incurred by our general partner or these other persons. We must
provide this indemnification unless there has been a final and
non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction
determining that these persons acted in bad faith or engaged in
fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence. We also must
provide this indemnification for criminal proceedings when our
general partner or these other persons acted with no reasonable
cause to believe that their conduct was unlawful. Thus, our
general partner could be indemnified for its negligent acts if
it met the requirements set forth above. To the extent that
these provisions purport to include indemnification for
liabilities arising under the Securities Act, in the opinion of
the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
contrary to public policy and therefore unenforceable. Please
read The Partnership Agreement
Indemnification.
154
DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMON UNITS
The Units
The common units and the subordinated units represent limited
partner interests in us. The holders of units are entitled to
participate in partnership distributions and exercise the rights
and privileges available to limited partners under our
partnership agreement. For a description of the relative rights
and privileges of holders of common units and subordinated units
in and to partnership distributions, please read this section
and Cash Distribution Policy. For a description of
the rights and privileges of limited partners under our
partnership agreement, including voting rights, please read
The Partnership Agreement.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The Bank of New York serves as registrar and transfer agent for
the common units. We pay all fees charged by the transfer agent
for transfers of common units, except the following, which must
be paid by unitholders:
|
|
|
|
|
surety bond premiums to replace lost or stolen certificates,
taxes and other governmental charges; |
|
|
|
special charges for services requested by a holder of a common
unit; and |
|
|
|
other similar fees or charges. |
There is no charge to unitholders for disbursements of our cash
distributions. We will indemnify the transfer agent, its agents
and each of their stockholders, directors, officers and
employees against all claims and losses that may arise out of
acts performed or omitted for its activities in that capacity,
except for any liability due to any gross negligence or
intentional misconduct of the indemnified person or entity.
The transfer agent may resign, by notice to us, or be removed by
us. The resignation or removal of the transfer agent will become
effective upon our appointment of a successor transfer agent and
registrar and its acceptance of the appointment. If a successor
has not been appointed or has not accepted its appointment
within 30 days after notice of the resignation or removal,
our general partner may act as the transfer agent and registrar
until a successor is appointed.
Transfer of Common Units
The transfer of the common units to persons that purchase
directly from the underwriters will be accomplished through the
completion, execution and delivery of a transfer application by
the investor. Any later transfers of a common unit will not be
recorded by the transfer agent or recognized by us unless the
transferee executes and delivers a transfer application. By
executing and delivering a transfer application, the transferee
of common units:
|
|
|
|
|
becomes the record holder of the common units and is an assignee
until admitted into our partnership as a substituted limited
partner; |
|
|
|
automatically requests admission as a substituted limited
partner in our partnership; |
|
|
|
agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of, and executes,
our partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
represents that the transferee has the capacity, power and
authority to enter into the partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
grants powers of attorney to officers of our general partner and
any liquidator of us as specified in the partnership
agreement; and |
155
|
|
|
|
|
gives the consents and approvals contained in our partnership
agreement, such as the approval of all transactions and
agreements we are entering into in connection with our formation
and this offering. |
An assignee will become a substituted limited partner of our
partnership for the transferred common units automatically upon
the recording of the transfer on our books and records. Our
general partner will cause any unrecorded transfers for which a
completed and duly executed transfer application has been
received to be recorded on our books and records no less
frequently than quarterly.
A transferees broker, agent or nominee may complete,
execute and deliver a transfer application. We are entitled to
treat the nominee holder of a common unit as the absolute owner.
In that case, the beneficial holders rights are limited
solely to those that it has against the nominee holder as a
result of any agreement between the beneficial owner and the
nominee holder.
Common units are securities and are transferable according to
the laws governing transfer of securities. In addition to other
rights acquired upon transfer, the transferor gives the
transferee the right to request admission as a substituted
limited partner in our partnership for the transferred common
units. A purchaser or transferee of common units who does not
execute and deliver a transfer application obtains only:
|
|
|
|
|
the right to assign the common unit to a purchaser or other
transferee; and |
|
|
|
the right to transfer the right to seek admission as a
substituted limited partner in our partnership for the
transferred common units. |
Thus, a purchaser or transferee of common units who does not
execute and deliver a transfer application:
|
|
|
|
|
will not receive cash distributions or federal income tax
allocations, unless the common units are held in a nominee or
street name account and the nominee or broker has
executed and delivered a transfer application; and |
|
|
|
may not receive some U.S. federal income tax information or
reports furnished to record holders of common units. |
The transferor of common units has a duty to provide the
transferee with all information that may be necessary to
transfer the common units. The transferor does not have a duty
to ensure the execution of the transfer application by the
transferee and has no liability or responsibility if the
transferee neglects or chooses not to execute and forward the
transfer application to the transfer agent. Please read
The Partnership Agreement Status as Limited
Partner or Assignee.
Until a common unit has been transferred on our books, we and
the transfer agent may treat the record holder of the unit as
the absolute owner for all purposes, except as otherwise
required by law or stock exchange regulations.
156
THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material provisions of our
partnership agreement. Our partnership agreement and limited
liability company agreements of our subsidiaries are included as
exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus
is a part. We will provide prospective investors with a copy of
these agreements upon request at no charge.
We summarize the following provisions of our partnership
agreement elsewhere in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
with regard to distributions of available cash, please read
Cash Distribution Policy; |
|
|
|
with regard to the fiduciary duties of our general partner,
please read Conflicts of Interests and Fiduciary
Duties; |
|
|
|
with regard to the transfer of common units, please read
Description of the Common Units Transfer of
Common Units; and |
|
|
|
with regard to allocations of U.S. federal taxable income
and loss, please read Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Consequences. |
Organization and Duration
We were organized on November 3, 2004 and have perpetual
existence.
Purpose
Our purpose under the partnership agreement is limited to
serving as the sole member of our operating company, Teekay LNG
Operating L.L.C., and engaging in any business activities that
may be engaged in by our operating company or that are approved
by our general partner. The operating agreement of our operating
company provides that it may, directly or indirectly, engage in
operations as conducted immediately before our initial public
offering or any other activity approved by our general partner.
Although our general partner has the ability to cause us, our
operating company or its subsidiaries to engage in activities
other than the marine transportation of liquefied natural gas
and crude oil, our general partner has no current plans to do so
and may decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or
obligation whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including
any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us or
the limited partners. Our general partner is authorized in
general to perform all acts it determines to be necessary or
appropriate to carry out our purposes and to conduct our
business.
Power of Attorney
Each limited partner, and each person who acquires a unit from
another unitholder and executes and delivers a transfer
application, grants to our general partner and, if appointed, a
liquidator, a power of attorney to, among other things, execute
and file documents required for our qualification, continuance
or dissolution. The power of attorney also grants our general
partner the authority to amend, and to make consents and waivers
under, the partnership agreement.
Capital Contributions
Unitholders are not obligated to make additional capital
contributions, except as described below under
Limited Liability.
157
Voting Rights
The following matters require the unitholder vote specified
below. Matters requiring the approval of a unit
majority require:
|
|
|
|
|
during the subordination period, the approval of a majority of
the common units, excluding those common units held by our
general partner and its affiliates, and a majority of the
subordinated units, voting as separate classes; and |
|
|
|
after the subordination period, the approval of a majority of
the common units. |
In voting their common and subordinated units, the general
partner and its affiliates will have no fiduciary duty or
obligation whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including
any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us and
the limited partners.
|
|
|
Action |
|
Unitholder Approval Required |
|
|
|
Issuance of additional units
|
|
No approval rights. |
|
Amendment of the partnership agreement
|
|
Certain amendments may be made by the general partner without
the approval of the unitholders. Other amendments generally
require the approval of a unit majority. Please read
Amendment of the Partnership Agreement. |
|
Amendment of the operating agreement of the operating company
and other action taken by us as a member of the operating company
|
|
Unit majority if such amendment or other action would adversely
affect our limited partners (or any particular class of limited
partners) in any material respect. Please read
Action Relating to the Operating Company. |
|
Merger of our partnership or the sale of all or substantially
all of our assets
|
|
Unit majority. Please read Merger, Sale or
Other Disposition of Assets. |
|
Dissolution of our partnership
|
|
Unit majority. Please read Termination and
Dissolution. |
|
Reconstitution of our partnership upon dissolution
|
|
Unit majority. Please read Termination and
Dissolution. |
|
Withdrawal of the general partner
|
|
Under most circumstances, the approval of a majority of the
common units, excluding common units held by the general partner
and its affiliates, is required for the withdrawal of the
general partner prior to March 31, 2015 in a manner which
would cause a dissolution of our partnership. Please read
Withdrawal or Removal of the General
Partner. |
|
Removal of the general partner
|
|
Not less than
662/3%
of the outstanding units, voting as a single class, including
units held by our general partner and its affiliates. Please
read Withdrawal or Removal of the General
Partner. |
158
|
|
|
Action |
|
Unitholder Approval Required |
|
|
|
|
Transfer of the general partner interest in us
|
|
Our general partner may transfer all, but not less than all, of
its general partner interest in us without a vote of our
unitholders to an affiliate or another person in connection with
its merger or consolidation with or into, or sale of all or
substantially all of its assets to such person. The approval of
a majority of the common units, excluding common units held by
the general partner and its affiliates, is required in other
circumstances for a transfer of the general partner interest to
a third party prior to March 31, 2015. Please read
Transfer of General Partner Interest. |
|
Transfer of incentive distribution rights
|
|
Except for transfers to an affiliate or another person as part
of the general partners merger or consolidation with or
into, or sale of all or substantially all of its assets to such
person, the approval of a majority of the common units,
excluding common units held by our general partner and its
affiliates, voting separately as a class, is required in most
circumstances for a transfer of the incentive distribution
rights to a third party prior to March 31, 2015. Please
read Transfer of Incentive Distribution
Rights. |
|
Transfer of ownership interests in the general partner
|
|
No approval required at any time. Please read
Transfer of Ownership Interests in
General Partner. |
Limited Liability
Assuming that a limited partner does not participate in the
control of our business within the meaning of the Marshall
Islands Act and that he otherwise acts in conformity with the
provisions of our partnership agreement, his liability under the
Marshall Islands Act will be limited, subject to possible
exceptions, to the amount of capital he is obligated to
contribute to us for his common units plus his share of any
undistributed profits and assets. If it were determined,
however, that the right, or exercise of the right, by the
limited partners as a group:
|
|
|
|
|
to remove or replace our general partner; |
|
|
|
to approve some amendments to our partnership agreement; or |
|
|
|
to take other action under our partnership agreement; |
constituted participation in the control of our
business for the purposes of the Marshall Islands Act, then the
limited partners could be held personally liable for our
obligations under the laws of Marshall Islands, to the same
extent as our general partner. This liability would extend to
persons who transact business with us who reasonably believe
that the limited partner is a general partner. Neither our
partnership agreement nor the Marshall Islands Act specifically
provides for legal recourse against our general partner if a
limited partner were to lose limited liability through any fault
of our general partner. While this does not mean that a limited
partner could not seek legal recourse, we know of no precedent
for this type of a claim in Marshall Islands case law.
Under the Marshall Islands Act, a limited partnership may not
make a distribution to a partner if, after the distribution, all
liabilities of the limited partnership, other than liabilities
to partners on account
159
of their partnership interests and liabilities for which the
recourse of creditors is limited to specific property of the
partnership, would exceed the fair value of the assets of the
limited partnership. For the purpose of determining the fair
value of the assets of a limited partnership, the Marshall
Islands Act provides that the fair value of property subject to
liability for which recourse of creditors is limited shall be
included in the assets of the limited partnership only to the
extent that the fair value of that property exceeds the
nonrecourse liability. The Marshall Islands Act provides that a
limited partner who receives a distribution and knew at the time
of the distribution that the distribution was in violation of
the Marshall Islands Act shall be liable to the limited
partnership for the amount of the distribution for three years.
Under the Marshall Islands Act, an assignee of partnership
interests who becomes a limited partner of a limited partnership
is liable for the obligations of his assignor to make
contributions to the partnership, except the assignee is not
obligated for liabilities unknown to him at the time he became a
limited partner and that could not be ascertained from the
partnership agreement.
Maintenance of our limited liability may require compliance with
legal requirements in the jurisdictions in which the operating
company and its subsidiaries conduct business, which may include
qualifying to do business in those jurisdictions.
Limitations on the liability of limited partners for the
obligations of a limited partner have not been clearly
established in many jurisdictions. If, by virtue of our
membership interest in the operating company or otherwise, it
were determined that we were conducting business in any
jurisdiction without compliance with the applicable limited
partnership or limited liability company statute, or that the
right or exercise of the right by the limited partners as a
group to remove or replace the general partner, to approve some
amendments to the partnership agreement, or to take other action
under the partnership agreement constituted participation
in the control of our business for purposes of the
statutes of any relevant jurisdiction, then the limited partners
could be held personally liable for our obligations under the
law of that jurisdiction to the same extent as the general
partner under the circumstances. We will operate in a manner
that the general partner considers reasonable and necessary or
appropriate to preserve the limited liability of the limited
partners.
Issuance of Additional Securities
The partnership agreement authorizes us to issue an unlimited
number of additional partnership securities and rights to buy
partnership securities for the consideration and on the terms
and conditions determined by the general partner without the
approval of the unitholders.
It is possible that we will fund acquisitions through the
issuance of additional common units or other equity securities.
Holders of any additional common units we issue will be entitled
to share equally with the then-existing holders of common units
in our distributions of available cash. In addition, the
issuance of additional common units or other equity securities
interests may dilute the value of the interests of the
then-existing holders of common units in our net assets.
In accordance with Marshall Islands law and the provisions of
our partnership agreement, we may also issue additional
partnership securities interests that, as determined by the
general partner, have special voting rights to which the common
units are not entitled.
Upon issuance of additional partnership securities other than
upon any exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option, our general partner will be required to make additional
capital contributions to the extent necessary to maintain its 2%
general partner interest in us. Moreover, our general partner
and its affiliates will have the right, which it may from time
to time assign in whole or in part to any of its affiliates, to
purchase common units, subordinated units or other equity
securities whenever, and on the same terms that, we issue those
securities to persons other than our general partner and its
affiliates, to the extent necessary to maintain its and its
affiliates percentage interest, including its interest
represented by common units and subordinated units, that existed
immediately prior to each issuance. Other holders of common
units will not have similar preemptive rights to acquire
additional common units or other partnership securities.
160
Amendment of the Partnership Agreement
Amendments to our partnership agreement may be proposed only by
or with the consent of our general partner. However, our general
partner will have no duty or obligation to propose any amendment
and may decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or
obligation whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including
any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us or
the limited partners. In order to adopt a proposed amendment,
other than the amendments discussed below, our general partner
must seek written approval of the holders of the number of units
required to approve the amendment or call a meeting of the
limited partners to consider and vote upon the proposed
amendment. Except as we describe below, an amendment must be
approved by a unit majority.
No amendment may be made that would:
|
|
|
(1) increase the obligations of any limited partner without
its consent, unless approved by at least a majority of the type
or class of limited partner interests so affected; |
|
|
(2) increase the obligations of, restrict in any way any
action by or rights of, or reduce in any way the amounts
distributable, reimbursable or otherwise payable by us to the
general partner or any of its affiliates without the consent of
the general partner, which may be given or withheld at its
option; |
|
|
(3) change the term of our partnership; |
|
|
(4) provide that our partnership is not dissolved upon an
election to dissolve our partnership by our general partner that
is approved by the holders of a unit majority; or |
|
|
(5) give any person the right to dissolve our partnership
other than our general partners right to dissolve our
partnership with the approval of the holders of a unit majority. |
The provision of our partnership agreement preventing the
amendments having the effects described in clauses (1)
through (5) above can be amended upon the approval of the
holders of at least 90% of the outstanding units voting together
as a single class (including units owned by our general partner
and its affiliates). Upon completion of this offering, the owner
of our general partner will own 68.3% of the outstanding units.
|
|
|
Our general partner may generally make amendments to our
partnership agreement without the approval of any limited
partner or assignee to reflect: |
|
|
(1) a change in our name, the location of our principal
place of business, our registered agent or our registered office; |
|
|
(2) the admission, substitution, withdrawal or removal of
partners in accordance with our partnership agreement; |
|
|
(3) a change that our general partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate for us to qualify or to continue our
qualification as a limited partnership or a partnership in which
the limited partners have limited liability under the laws of
any jurisdiction or to ensure that neither we, the operating
company, nor its subsidiaries will be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation or otherwise taxed as an entity for
federal income tax purposes; |
|
|
(4) an amendment that is necessary, upon the advice of our
counsel, to prevent us or our general partner or its directors,
officers, agents, or trustees from in any manner being subjected
to the provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the
Investment Advisors Act of 1940, or plan |
161
|
|
|
asset regulations adopted under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, or ERISA, whether or not substantially
similar to plan asset regulations currently applied or proposed; |
|
|
(5) an amendment that the general partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate for the authorization of additional
partnership securities or rights to acquire partnership
securities; |
|
|
(6) any amendment expressly permitted in the partnership
agreement to be made by the general partner acting alone; |
|
|
(7) an amendment effected, necessitated, or contemplated by
a merger agreement that has been approved under the terms of the
partnership agreement; |
|
|
(8) any amendment that the general partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate for the formation by us of, or our
investment in, any corporation, partnership or other entity, as
otherwise permitted by the partnership agreement; |
|
|
(9) a change in our fiscal year or taxable year and related
changes; |
|
|
(10) certain mergers or conveyances as set forth in our
partnership agreement; or |
|
|
(11) any other amendments substantially similar to any of
the matters described in (1) through (10) above. |
In addition, our general partner may make amendments to the
partnership agreement without the approval of any limited
partner or assignee if the general partner determines that those
amendments:
|
|
|
(1) do not adversely affect the limited partners (or any
particular class of limited partners) in any material respect; |
|
|
(2) are necessary or appropriate to satisfy any
requirements, conditions, or guidelines contained in any
opinion, directive, order, ruling or regulation of any federal
or state agency or judicial authority or contained in any
federal or state statute; |
|
|
(3) are necessary or appropriate to facilitate the trading
of limited partner interests or to comply with any rule,
regulation, guideline or requirement of any securities exchange
on which the limited partner interests are or will be listed for
trading; |
|
|
(4) are necessary or appropriate for any action taken by
the general partner relating to splits or combinations of units
under the provisions of the partnership agreement; or |
|
|
(5) are required to effect the intent expressed in this
prospectus or the intent of the provisions of the partnership
agreement or are otherwise contemplated by the partnership
agreement. |
|
|
|
Opinion of Counsel and Unitholder Approval |
Our general partner will not be required to obtain an opinion of
counsel that an amendment will not result in a loss of limited
liability to the limited partners or result in our being treated
as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes if
one of the amendments described above under No
Unitholder Approval should occur. No other amendments to
our partnership agreement will become effective without the
approval of holders of at least 90% of the outstanding units
voting as a single class unless we obtain an opinion of counsel
to the effect that the amendment will not affect the limited
liability under applicable law of any of our limited partners.
In addition to the above restrictions, any amendment that would
have a material adverse effect on the rights or privileges of
any type or class of outstanding units in relation to other
classes of units will require the approval of at least a
majority of the type or class of units so affected. Any
amendment that reduces the voting percentage required to take
any action must be approved by the affirmative vote of limited
partners whose aggregate outstanding units constitute not less
than the voting requirement sought to be reduced.
162
Action Relating to the Operating Company
Without the approval of the holders or units representing a unit
majority, our general partner is prohibited from consenting on
our behalf, as the sole member of the operating company, to any
amendment to the limited liability company agreement of the
operating company or taking any action on our behalf permitted
to be taken by a limited partner of the operating company in
each case that would adversely affect our limited partners (or
any particular class of limited partners) in any material
respect.
Merger, Sale, or Other Disposition of Assets
A merger or consolidation of us requires the consent of our
general partner. However, our general partner will have no duty
or obligation to consent to any merger or consolidation and may
decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or obligation
whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including any duty to
act in good faith or in the best interests of us or the limited
partners. In addition, our partnership agreement generally
prohibits our general partner, without the prior approval of the
holders of units representing a unit majority, from causing us
to, among other things, sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of
all or substantially all of our assets in a single transaction
or a series of related transactions, including by way of merger,
consolidation, or other combination, or approving on our behalf
the sale, exchange, or other disposition of all or substantially
all of the assets of our subsidiaries. Our general partner may,
however, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate, or grant a security
interest in all or substantially all of our assets without that
approval. Our general partner may also sell all or substantially
all of our assets under a foreclosure or other realization upon
those encumbrances without that approval.
If conditions specified in our partnership agreement are
satisfied, our general partner may convert us or any of our
subsidiaries into a new limited liability entity or merge us or
any of our subsidiaries into, or convey some or all of our
assets to, a newly formed entity if the sole purpose of that
merger or conveyance is to effect a mere change in our legal
form into another limited liability entity. The unitholders are
not entitled to dissenters rights of appraisal under our
partnership agreement or applicable law in the event of a
conversion, merger or consolidation, a sale of substantially all
of our assets, or any other transaction or event.
Termination and Dissolution
We will continue as a limited partnership until terminated under
our partnership agreement. We will dissolve upon:
|
|
|
(1) the election of our general partner to dissolve us, if
approved by the holders of units representing a unit majority; |
|
|
(2) the sale, exchange, or other disposition of all or
substantially all of our assets and properties and our
subsidiaries; |
|
|
(3) the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of
us; or |
|
|
(4) the withdrawal or removal of our general partner or any
other event that results in its ceasing to be the general
partner other than by reason of a transfer of its general
partner interest in accordance with the partnership agreement or
withdrawal or removal following approval and admission of a
successor. |
Upon a dissolution under clause (4), the holders of a unit
majority may also elect, within specific time limitations, to
continue our business on the same terms and conditions described
in the partnership
163
agreement by appointing as general partner an entity approved by
the holders of units representing a unit majority, subject to
our receipt of an opinion of counsel to the effect that:
|
|
|
(1) the action would not result in the loss of limited
liability of any limited partner; and |
|
|
(2) none of our partnership or the operating company nor
any of our other subsidiaries would be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation or otherwise be taxable as an entity
for federal income tax purposes upon the exercise of that right
to continue. |
Liquidation and Distribution of Proceeds
Upon our dissolution, unless we are continued as a new limited
partnership, the liquidator authorized to wind up our affairs
will, acting with all of the powers of the general partner that
are necessary or appropriate, liquidate our assets and apply the
proceeds of the liquidation as provided in Cash
Distribution Policy Distributions of Cash Upon
Liquidation. The liquidator may defer liquidation or
distribution of our assets for a reasonable period or distribute
assets to partners in kind if it determines that a sale would be
impractical or would cause undue loss to our partners.
Withdrawal or Removal of the General Partner
Except as described below, our general partner has agreed not to
withdraw voluntarily as our general partner prior to
March 31, 2015 without obtaining the approval of the
holders of at least a majority of the outstanding common units,
excluding common units held by the general partner and its
affiliates, and furnishing an opinion of counsel regarding
limited liability and tax matters. On or after March 31,
2015, our general partner may withdraw as general partner
without first obtaining approval of any unitholder by giving
90 days written notice, and that withdrawal will not
constitute a violation of the partnership agreement.
Notwithstanding the information above, our general partner may
withdraw without unitholder approval upon 90 days
notice to the limited partners if at least 50% of the
outstanding common units are held or controlled by one person
and its affiliates other than the general partner and its
affiliates. In addition, the partnership agreement permits our
general partner in some instances to sell or otherwise transfer
all of its general partner interest in us without the approval
of the unitholders. Please read Transfer of
General Partner Interests and Transfer
of Incentive Distribution Rights.
Upon withdrawal of our general partner under any circumstances,
other than as a result of a transfer by the general partner of
all or a part of its general partner interest in us, the holders
of a majority of the outstanding common units and subordinated
units, voting as separate classes, may select a successor to
that withdrawing general partner. If a successor is not elected,
or is elected but an opinion of counsel regarding limited
liability and tax matters cannot be obtained, we will be
dissolved, wound up and liquidated, unless within a specified
period of time after that withdrawal, the holders of a unit
majority agree in writing to continue our business and to
appoint a successor general partner. Please read
Termination and Dissolution.
Our general partner may not be removed unless that removal is
approved by the vote of the holders of not less than
662/3%
of the outstanding units, voting together as a single class,
including units held by the general partner and its affiliates,
and we receive an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability
and tax matters. Any removal of our general partner is also
subject to the approval of a successor general partner by the
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding common
units and subordinated units, voting as separate classes. The
ownership of more than
331/3%
of the outstanding units by our general partner and its
affiliates would give them the practical ability to prevent the
general partners removal. Upon the closing of this
offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation will own 68.3% of the
outstanding units.
Our partnership agreement also provides that if our general
partner is removed as our general partner under circumstances
where cause does not exist and units held by the general partner
and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that removal:
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and all outstanding
subordinated units will immediately convert into common units on
a one-for-one basis; |
164
|
|
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and |
|
|
|
the general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner interest and its incentive distribution rights into
common units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests
based on the fair market value of the interests at the time. |
In the event of removal of the general partner under
circumstances where cause exists or withdrawal of the general
partner where that withdrawal violates the partnership
agreement, a successor general partner will have the option to
purchase the general partner interest and incentive distribution
rights of the departing general partner for a cash payment equal
to the fair market value of those interests. Under all other
circumstances where the general partner withdraws or is removed
by the limited partners, the departing general partner will have
the option to require the successor general partner to purchase
the general partner interest of the departing general partner
and its incentive distribution rights for their fair market
value. In each case, this fair market value will be determined
by agreement between the departing general partner and the
successor general partner. If no agreement is reached, an
independent investment banking firm or other independent expert
selected by the departing general partner and the successor
general partner will determine the fair market value. Or, if the
departing general partner and the successor general partner
cannot agree upon an expert, then an expert chosen by agreement
of the experts selected by each of them will determine the fair
market value.
If the option described above is not exercised by either the
departing general partner or the successor general partner, the
departing general partners general partner interest and
its incentive distribution rights will automatically convert
into common units equal to the fair market value of those
interests as determined by an investment banking firm or other
independent expert selected in the manner described in the
preceding paragraph.
In addition, we will be required to reimburse the departing
general partner for all amounts due the departing general
partner, including, without limitation, any employee-related
liabilities, including severance liabilities, incurred for the
termination of any employees employed by the departing general
partner or its affiliates for our benefit.
Transfer of General Partner Interest
Except for the transfer by our general partner of all, but not
less than all, of its general partner interest in us to:
|
|
|
|
|
an affiliate of the general partner (other than an
individual), or |
|
|
|
another entity as part of the merger or consolidation of our
general partner with or into another entity or the transfer by
the general partner of all or substantially all of its assets to
another entity, |
our general partner may not transfer all or any part of its
general partner interest in us to another person prior to
March 31, 2015 without the approval of the holders of at
least a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding
common units held by the general partner and its affiliates. As
a condition of this transfer, the transferee must, among other
things, assume the rights and duties of the general partner,
agree to be bound by the provisions of the partnership agreement
and furnish an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability
and tax matters.
Our general partner and its affiliates may at any time transfer
units to one or more persons, without unitholder approval,
except that they may not transfer subordinated units to us.
Transfer of Ownership Interests in General Partner
At any time, the members of our general partner may sell or
transfer all or part of their respective membership interests in
our general partner to an affiliate or a third party without the
approval of our unitholders.
165
Transfer of Incentive Distribution Rights
Our general partner or its affiliates or a subsequent holder may
transfer its incentive distribution rights to an affiliate of
the holder (other than an individual) or another entity as part
of the merger or consolidation of such holder with or into
another entity, or sale of all or substantially all of its
assets to that entity without the prior approval of the
unitholders. Prior to March 31, 2015, other transfers of
the incentive distribution rights will require the affirmative
vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding common units,
excluding common units held by the general partner and its
affiliates. On or after March 31, 2015, the incentive
distribution rights will be freely transferable.
Change of Management Provisions
The partnership agreement contains specific provisions that are
intended to discourage a person or group from attempting to
remove Teekay GP L.L.C. as our general partner or otherwise
change management. If any person or group other than the general
partner and its affiliates acquires beneficial ownership of 20%
or more of any class of units, that person or group loses voting
rights on all of its units. This loss of voting rights does not
apply to any person or group that acquires the units from our
general partner or its affiliates and any transferees of that
person or group approved by our general partner or to any person
or group who acquires the units with the prior approval of the
board of directors of the general partner.
The partnership agreement also provides that if the general
partner is removed under circumstances where cause does not
exist and units held by the general partner and its affiliates
are not voted in favor of that removal:
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and all outstanding
subordinated units will immediately convert into common units on
a one-for-one basis; |
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and |
|
|
|
the general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner interest and its incentive distribution rights into
common units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests. |
Limited Call Right
If at any time the general partner and its affiliates hold more
than 80% of the then-issued and outstanding partnership
securities of any class, the general partner will have the
right, which it may assign in whole or in part to any of its
affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of
the remaining partnership securities of the class held by
unaffiliated persons as of a record date to be selected by the
general partner, on at least ten but not more than
60 days notice. The purchase price in this event is
the greater of: (1) the highest cash price paid by either
of the general partner or any of its affiliates for any
partnership securities of the class purchased within the
90 days preceding the date on which the general partner
first mails notice of its election to purchase those partnership
securities; and (2) the current market price as of the date
three days before the date the notice is mailed.
As a result of the general partners right to purchase
outstanding partnership securities, a holder of partnership
securities may have the holders partnership securities
purchased at an undesirable time or price. The tax consequences
to a unitholder of the exercise of this call right are the same
as a sale by that unitholder of common units in the market.
Please read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Disposition of Common Units.
At the completion of this offering and assuming no exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option, Teekay Shipping
Corporation, an affiliate of our general partner, will own
approximately 44.5% of the common units. At the end of the
subordination period, assuming no additional issuances of common
units, no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option and conversion of our subordinated units into
166
common units, Teekay Shipping Corporation will own approximately
68.3% of the common units. Teekay Shipping Corporation will also
acquire additional common units if:
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner determines to pay a portion of the purchase
price for the Suezmax tankers and related assets we will acquire
from Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of this
offering with our common units; or |
|
|
|
in connection with the sale to us of its 70% interest in Teekay
Nakilat, which owns the three RasGas II LNG newbuilding
carriers, Teekay Shipping Corporation elects to receive common
units in satisfaction of the cash portion of the purchase price
for that ownership interest. |
Accordingly, after subordinated units are converted to common
units, our general partner and its affiliates may own a
sufficient percentage of our common units to enable our general
partner to exercise its limited call right. Please read
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase Suezmax Tankers
and Time Charters and Agreement to Purchase
RasGas II Interest.
Meetings; Voting
Except as described below regarding a person or group owning 20%
or more of any class of units then outstanding, unitholders or
assignees who are record holders of units on the record date
will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, meetings of our
limited partners and to act upon matters for which approvals may
be solicited. Common units that are owned by an assignee who is
a record holder, but who has not yet been admitted as a limited
partner, will be voted by the general partner at the written
direction of the record holder. Absent direction of this kind,
the common units will not be voted, except that, in the case of
common units held by the general partner on behalf of
unpermitted citizen assignees, the general partner will
distribute the votes on those common units in the same ratios as
the votes of limited partners on other units are cast.
The general partner does not anticipate that any meeting of
unitholders will be called in the foreseeable future. Any action
that is required or permitted to be taken by the unitholders may
be taken either at a meeting of the unitholders or without a
meeting if consents in writing describing the action so taken
are signed by holders of the number of units necessary to
authorize or take that action at a meeting. Meetings of the
unitholders may be called by the general partner or by
unitholders owning at least 20% of the outstanding units of the
class for which a meeting is proposed. Unitholders may vote
either in person or by proxy at meetings. The holders of a
majority of the outstanding units of the class or classes for
which a meeting has been called, represented in person or by
proxy, will constitute a quorum unless any action by the
unitholders requires approval by holders of a greater percentage
of the units, in which case the quorum will be the greater
percentage.
Each record holder of a unit may vote according to the
holders percentage interest in us, although additional
limited partner interests having special voting rights could be
issued. Please read Issuance of Additional
Securities. However, if at any time any person or group,
other than the general partner and its affiliates, or a direct
or subsequently approved transferee of the general partner or
its affiliates or a transferee approved by the board of
directors of the general partner, acquires, in the aggregate,
beneficial ownership of 20% or more of any class of units then
outstanding, that person or group will lose voting rights on all
of its units and the units may not be voted on any matter and
will not be considered to be outstanding when sending notices of
a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes,
determining the presence of a quorum, or for other similar
purposes. Common units held in nominee or street name account
will be voted by the broker or other nominee in accordance with
the instruction of the beneficial owner unless the arrangement
between the beneficial owner and his nominee provides otherwise.
Except as the partnership agreement otherwise provides,
subordinated units will vote together with common units as a
single class.
Any notice, demand, request report, or proxy material required
or permitted to be given or made to record holders of common
units under the partnership agreement will be delivered to the
record holder by us or by the transfer agent.
167
Status as Limited Partner or Assignee
Except as described above under Limited
Liability, the common units will be fully paid, and
unitholders will not be required to make additional
contributions.
An assignee of a common unit, after executing and delivering a
transfer application, but pending its admission as a substituted
limited partner, is entitled to an interest equivalent to that
of a limited partner for the right to share in allocations and
distributions from us, including liquidating distributions. The
general partner will vote and exercise other powers attributable
to common units owned by an assignee that has not become a
substitute limited partner at the written direction of the
assignee. Please read Meetings; Voting.
Transferees that do not execute and deliver a transfer
application will not be treated as assignees or as record
holders of common units, and will not receive cash
distributions, federal income tax allocations or reports
furnished to holders of common units. Please read
Description of the Common Units Transfer of
Common Units.
Indemnification
Under the partnership agreement, in most circumstances, we will
indemnify the following persons, to the fullest extent permitted
by law, from and against all losses, claims, damages or similar
events:
|
|
|
(1) our general partner; |
|
|
(2) any departing general partner; |
|
|
(3) any person who is or was an affiliate of our general
partner or any departing general partner; |
|
|
(4) any person who is or was an officer, director, member
or partner of any entity described in (1), (2) or
(3) above; |
|
|
(5) any person who is or was serving as a director,
officer, member, partner, fiduciary or trustee of another person
at the request of our general partner or any departing general
partner; or |
|
|
(6) any person designated by our general partner. |
Any indemnification under these provisions will only be out of
our assets. Unless it otherwise agrees, the general partner will
not be personally liable for, or have any obligation to
contribute or lend funds or assets to us to enable us to
effectuate, indemnification. We may purchase insurance against
liabilities asserted against and expenses incurred by persons
for our activities, regardless of whether we would have the
power to indemnify the person against liabilities under the
partnership agreement.
Books and Reports
The general partner is required to keep appropriate books of our
business at our principal offices. The books will be maintained
for both tax and financial reporting purposes on an accrual
basis. For tax and fiscal reporting purposes, our fiscal year is
the calendar year.
We will furnish or make available to record holders of common
units, within 120 days after the close of each fiscal year,
an annual report containing audited financial statements and a
report on those financial statements by our independent
chartered accountants. Except for our fourth quarter, we will
also furnish or make available summary financial information
within 90 days after the close of each quarter.
We will furnish each record holder of a unit with information
reasonably required for U.S. tax reporting purposes within
90 days after the close of each calendar year. This
information is expected to be furnished in summary form so that
some complex calculations normally required of partners can be
avoided. Our ability to furnish this summary information to
unitholders will depend on the cooperation of unitholders in
supplying us with specific information. Every unitholder will
receive information to assist the unitholder in determining the
unitholders U.S. federal and state tax liability and
filing obligations, regardless of whether he supplies us with
information.
168
Right to Inspect Our Books and Records
The partnership agreement provides that a limited partner can,
for a purpose reasonably related to his interest as a limited
partner, upon reasonable demand and at the limited
partners own expense, have furnished to the limited
partner:
|
|
|
(1) a current list of the name and last known address of
each partner; |
|
|
(2) a copy of our tax returns; |
|
|
(3) information as to the amount of cash, and a description
and statement of the agreed value of any other property or
services, contributed or to be contributed by each partner and
the date on which each became a partner; |
|
|
(4) copies of the partnership agreement, the certificate of
limited partnership of the partnership, related amendments and
powers of attorney under which they have been executed; |
|
|
(5) information regarding the status of our business and
financial condition; and |
|
|
(6) any other information regarding our affairs as is just
and reasonable. |
The general partner may, and intends to, keep confidential from
the limited partners trade secrets or other information the
disclosure of which the general partner believes in good faith
is not in our best interests or that we are required by law or
by agreements with third parties to keep confidential.
Registration Rights
Under the partnership agreement, we have agreed to register for
resale under the Securities Act of 1933 and applicable state
securities laws any common units, subordinated units or other
partnership securities proposed to be sold by the general
partner or any of its affiliates or their assignees if an
exemption from the registration requirements is not otherwise
available or advisable. These registration rights continue for
two years following any withdrawal or removal of Teekay GP
L.L.C. as our general partner. We are obligated to pay all
expenses incidental to the registration, excluding underwriting
discounts and commissions. Please read Units Eligible for
Future Sale.
169
UNITS ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
After the sale of the common units offered by this prospectus,
Teekay Shipping Corporation will hold an aggregate of
8,734,572 common units and 14,734,572 subordinated units.
All of the subordinated units will convert into common units at
the end of the subordination period, and some may convert
earlier. The sale of these common and subordinated units could
have an adverse impact on the price of the common units or on
any trading market that may develop.
The common units sold in this offering will generally be freely
transferable without restriction or further registration under
the Securities Act of 1933. However, any common units held by an
affiliate of ours may not be resold publicly except
in compliance with the registration requirements of the
Securities Act or under an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 144 or
otherwise. Rule 144 permits securities acquired by an
affiliate of ours to be sold into the market in an amount that
does not exceed, during any three-month period, the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the total number of the class of securities
outstanding; or |
|
|
|
the average weekly reported trading volume of the common units
for the four calendar weeks prior to the sale. |
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to specific manner of
sale provisions, holding period requirements, notice
requirements and the availability of current public information
about us. A person who is not deemed to have been an affiliate
of ours at any time during the three months preceding a sale,
and who has beneficially owned common units for at least two
years, would be entitled to sell those common units under
Rule 144 without regard to the current public information
requirements, volume limitations, manner of sale provisions, and
notice requirements of Rule 144.
The partnership agreement provides that we may issue an
unlimited number of limited partner interests of any type
without a vote of the unitholders. Any issuance of additional
common units or other equity securities would result in a
corresponding decrease in the proportionate ownership interest
in us represented by, and could adversely affect the cash
distributions to and market price of, common units then
outstanding. Please read The Partnership
Agreement Issuance of Additional Securities.
Under the partnership agreement, our general partner and its
affiliates have the right to cause us to register under the
Securities Act and applicable state securities laws the offer
and sale of any units that they hold. Subject to the terms and
conditions of the partnership agreement, these registration
rights allow our general partner and its affiliates or their
assignees holding any units to require registration of any of
these units and to include any of these units in a registration
by us of other units, including units offered by us or by any
unitholder. Our general partner will continue to have these
registration rights for two years following its withdrawal or
removal as our general partner. In connection with any
registration of this kind, we will indemnify each unitholder
participating in the registration and its officers, directors
and controlling persons from and against any liabilities under
the Securities Act or any applicable state securities laws
arising from the registration statement or prospectus. We will
bear all costs and expenses incidental to any registration,
excluding any underwriting discounts and commissions. Except as
described below, our general partner and its affiliates may sell
their units in private transactions at any time, subject to
compliance with applicable laws.
Teekay Shipping Corporation and the directors and executive
officers of our general partner and those of Teekay Shipping
Corporation have agreed, without the prior written consent of
Citigroup, not to sell any common units for a period of
90 days from the date of this prospectus, subject to
certain exceptions. Please read Underwriting for a
description of these lock-up provisions.
170
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
This section is a discussion of the material U.S. federal
income tax considerations that may be relevant to prospective
unitholders who are individual citizens or residents of the
United States and, unless otherwise noted in the following
discussion, is the opinion of Perkins Coie LLP, counsel to the
general partner and us, insofar as it relates to matters of
U.S. federal income tax law and legal conclusions with
respect to those matters. This section is based upon provisions
of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (or the
Internal Revenue Code) as in effect on the date of this
prospectus, existing final, temporary and proposed regulations
thereunder (or Treasury Regulations) and current
administrative rulings and court decisions, all of which are
subject to change. Changes in these authorities may cause the
tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences
described below. Unless the context otherwise requires,
references in this section to we, our or
us are references to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. and
its direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries that have
properly elected to be disregarded as entities separate from
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. for U.S. federal tax purposes.
The following discussion does not comment on all
U.S. federal income tax matters affecting us or the
unitholders. Moreover, the discussion focuses on unitholders who
are individual citizens or residents of the United States and
hold their units as capital assets and has only limited
application to corporations, estates, trusts,
non-U.S. persons or other unitholders subject to
specialized tax treatment, such as tax-exempt entities
(including IRAs), regulated investment companies (mutual funds)
and real estate investment trusts (or REITs).
Accordingly, we urge each prospective unitholder to consult, and
depend on, his own tax advisor in analyzing the
U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax
consequences particular to him of the ownership or disposition
of common units.
All statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions, but
not as to factual matters, contained in this section, unless
otherwise noted, are the opinion of Perkins Coie LLP and are
based on the accuracy of the representations made by us to
Perkins Coie LLP for purposes of their opinion.
Except as described below under Classification
as a Partnership, no ruling has been or will be requested
from the IRS regarding any matter affecting us or prospective
unitholders. Instead, we will rely on opinions of Perkins Coie
LLP. Unlike a ruling, an opinion of counsel represents only that
counsels best legal judgment and does not bind the IRS or
the courts. Accordingly, the opinions and statements made here
may not be sustained by a court if contested by the IRS. Any
contest of this nature with the IRS may materially and adversely
impact the market for the common units and the prices at which
common units trade. In addition, the costs of any contest with
the IRS, principally legal, accounting and related fees, will
result in a reduction in cash available for distribution to our
unitholders and our general partner and thus will be borne
indirectly by our unitholders and our general partner.
Furthermore, our tax treatment, or the tax treatment of an
investment in us, may be significantly modified by future
legislative or administrative changes or court decisions. Any
modifications may or may not be retroactively applied.
For the reasons described below, Perkins Coie LLP has not
rendered an opinion with respect to the following specific
U.S. federal income tax issues: (1) the treatment of a
unitholder whose common units are loaned to a short seller to
cover a short sale of common units (please read
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Treatment of Short Sales); (2) whether our method for
depreciating Section 743 adjustments is sustainable in
certain cases (please read Consequences of
Unit Ownership Section 754 Election); and
(3) whether our monthly convention for allocating taxable
income and losses is permitted by existing Treasury Regulations
(please read Disposition of Common
Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees). Perkins Coie LLP has not rendered an opinion
on any state, local or non-U.S. tax matters.
Classification as a Partnership
For purposes of U.S. federal income taxes, a partnership is
not a taxable entity, and although it may be subject to
withholding taxes on behalf of its partners under certain
circumstances, a partnership itself incurs no U.S. federal
income tax liability. Instead, each partner of a partnership is
required to take into account his share of items of income,
gain, loss, deduction and credit of the partnership in computing
his
171
U.S. federal income tax liability, regardless of whether
cash distributions are made to him by the partnership.
Distributions by a partnership to a partner generally are not
taxable unless the amount of cash distributed is in excess of
the partners adjusted tax basis in his partnership
interest.
Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that
publicly traded partnerships will, as a general rule, be treated
as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
However, an exception, referred to as the Qualifying
Income Exception, exists with respect to publicly traded
partnerships whose qualifying income represents 90%
or more of their gross income for every taxable year. Qualifying
income includes income and gains derived from the transportation
and storage of crude oil, natural gas and products thereof,
including liquefied natural gas. Other types of qualifying
income include interest (other than from a financial business),
dividends, gains from the sale of real property and gains from
the sale or other disposition of capital assets held for the
production of qualifying income, including stock. We recently
received a ruling from the IRS that we requested in connection
with our initial public offering to the effect that the income
we derive from transporting LNG and crude oil pursuant to time
charters existing at the time of our initial public offering is
qualifying income within the meaning of Section 7704. A
ruling from the IRS, while generally binding on the IRS, may
under certain circumstances be revoked or modified by the IRS
retroactively. As to income that is not covered by the IRS
ruling, we will rely upon the opinion of Perkins Coie LLP
whether the income is qualifying income.
We estimate that less than 5% of our current income is not
qualifying income; however, this estimate could change from time
to time. There are a number of factors that could cause the
percentage of our income that is qualifying income to vary. For
example, we have not received an IRS ruling or an opinion of
counsel that any income or gain we recognize from foreign
currency transactions or from interest rate swaps is qualifying
income. Under some circumstances, such as a significant increase
in interest rates, the percentage of such income or gain in
relation to our total gross income could be substantial.
However, we do not expect income or gains from foreign currency
transactions or interest rate swaps to constitute a significant
percentage of our current or future gross income for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Perkins Coie LLP is of the opinion that, based upon the Internal
Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations thereunder, published revenue
rulings and court decisions, the IRS ruling and representations
described below, we will be classified as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In rendering its opinion, Perkins Coie LLP has relied on factual
representations made by us and the general partner. The
representations made by us and our general partner upon which
Perkins Coie LLP has relied are:
|
|
|
|
|
We have not elected and will not elect to be treated as a
corporation, and each of our direct or indirect wholly-owned
subsidiaries has properly elected to be disregarded as an entity
separate from us, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes; and |
|
|
|
|
For each taxable year, at least 90% of our gross income will be
either (a) income to which the IRS ruling described above
applies or (b) of a type that Perkins Coie LLP has opined
or will opine is qualifying income within the
meaning of Section 7704(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. |
|
The discussion that follows is based on the assumption that we
will be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. Please read Possible
Classification as a Corporation below for a discussion of
the consequences of our failing to be treated as a partnership
for such purposes.
Status as a Partner
The treatment of unitholders described in this section applies
only to unitholders treated as partners in us for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. Unitholders who have been
properly admitted as limited partners of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. will be treated as partners in us for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. Also:
|
|
|
|
|
assignees of common units who have executed and delivered
transfer applications, and are awaiting admission as limited
partners; and |
172
|
|
|
|
|
unitholders whose common units are held in street name or by a
nominee and who have the right to direct the nominee in the
exercise of all substantive rights attendant to the ownership of
their common units |
will be treated as partners in us for U.S. federal income
tax purposes.
Because there is no direct authority addressing the status of
assignees of common units who are entitled to execute and
deliver transfer applications and thereby become entitled to
direct the exercise of attendant rights, but who fail to execute
and deliver transfer applications, Perkins Coie LLPs
opinion does not extend to these persons. Furthermore, a
purchaser or other transferee of common units who does not
execute and deliver a transfer application may not receive some
U.S. federal income tax information or reports furnished to
record holders of common units, unless the common units are held
in a nominee or street name account and the nominee or broker
has executed and delivered a transfer application for those
common units.
Under certain circumstances, a beneficial owner of common units
whose units have been loaned to another may lose his status as a
partner with respect to those units for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. Please read Consequences of Unit
Ownership Treatment of Short Sales.
In general, a person who is not a partner in a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes is not required or
permitted to report any share of the partnerships income,
gain, deductions or losses for such purposes, and any cash
distributions received by such a person from the partnership
therefore may be fully taxable as ordinary income. Unitholders
not described here are urged to consult their own tax advisors
with respect to their status as partners in us for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Flow-through of Taxable Income. Each unitholder is
required to include in income his allocable share of our income,
gains, losses and deductions for our taxable year ending with or
within his taxable year, without regard to whether we make
corresponding cash distributions to him. Our taxable year ends
on December 31. Consequently, we may allocate income to a
unitholder as of December 31 of a given year, and the
unitholder will be required to report this income on his tax
return for his tax year that ends on or includes such date, even
if he has not received a cash distribution from us as of that
date.
Treatment of Distributions. Distributions by us to
a unitholder generally will not be taxable to the unitholder for
U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of his tax
basis in his common units immediately before the distribution.
Our cash distributions in excess of a unitholders tax
basis generally will be considered to be gain from the sale or
exchange of the common units, taxable in accordance with the
rules described under Disposition of Common
Units below. Any reduction in a unitholders share of
our liabilities for which no partner, including the general
partner, bears the economic risk of loss, known as
nonrecourse liabilities, will be treated as a
distribution of cash to that unitholder. To the extent our
distributions cause a unitholders at risk
amount to be less than zero at the end of any taxable year, he
must recapture any losses deducted in previous years. Please
read Limitations on Deductibility of
Losses.
A decrease in a unitholders percentage interest in us
because of our issuance of additional common units will decrease
his share of our nonrecourse liabilities, and thus will result
in a corresponding deemed distribution of cash. A non-pro rata
distribution of money or property may result in ordinary income
to a unitholder, regardless of his tax basis in his common
units, if the distribution reduces the unitholders share
of our unrealized receivables, including
depreciation recapture, and/or substantially appreciated
inventory items, both as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code (or, collectively, Section 751 Assets).
To that extent, he will be treated as having been distributed
his proportionate share of the Section 751 Assets and
having exchanged those assets with us in return for the non-pro
rata portion of the actual distribution made to him. This latter
deemed exchange will generally result in the unitholders
realization of ordinary income, which will equal the excess of
(1) the non-pro rata portion of that distribution over
(2) the unitholders tax basis for the share of
Section 751 Assets deemed relinquished in the exchange.
173
Ratio of Taxable Income to Distributions. We
estimate that a purchaser of common units in this offering who
owns those common units from the date of closing of this
offering through December 31, 2008, will be allocated an
amount of U.S. federal taxable income for that period that
will be 20% or less of the cash distributed with respect to that
period. We anticipate that after the taxable year ending
December 31, 2008, the ratio of allocable taxable income to
cash distributions to the unitholders will increase. These
estimates are based upon the assumption that gross income from
operations will approximate the amount required to make the
minimum quarterly distribution on all units, on the assumption
that subsequent issuances of units, if any, during the period
ending December 31, 2008 will be at a price that is not
materially greater than the price to public in this offering,
and on other assumptions with respect to capital expenditures,
foreign currency translation income, gains on foreign currency
transactions, cash flow and anticipated cash distributions.
These estimates and assumptions are subject to, among other
things, numerous business, economic, regulatory, competitive and
political uncertainties beyond our control. Further, the
estimates are based on current U.S. federal income tax law
and tax reporting positions that we will adopt and with which
the IRS could disagree. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that
the actual percentage of distributions that will constitute
taxable income will not differ materially from our estimate.
Factors that would tend to increase the ratio of allocable
income to cash distributions include using cash flow from
operations or the issuance of additional units to repay debt,
increase cash reserves or working capital or to pay maintenance
capital expenditures and issuing a material number of additional
units after this offering at a price materially greater than the
price to public in this offering. If the ratio of allocable
taxable income to cash distributions were materially greater
than our estimate, the value of the common units could be
materially adversely affected.
Basis of Common Units. A unitholders initial
U.S. federal income tax basis for his common units will be
the amount he paid for the common units plus his share of our
nonrecourse liabilities. That basis will be increased by his
share of our income and by any increases in his share of our
nonrecourse liabilities. That basis will be decreased, but not
below zero, by distributions from us, by the unitholders
share of our losses, by any decreases in his share of our
nonrecourse liabilities and by his share of our expenditures
that are not deductible in computing taxable income and are not
required to be capitalized. A unitholder will have no share of
our debt that is recourse to the general partner, but will have
a share, generally based on his share of profits, of our
nonrecourse liabilities. Please read
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Limitations on Deductibility of Losses. The
deduction by a unitholder of his share of our losses will be
limited to the tax basis in his units and, in the case of an
individual unitholder or a corporate unitholder, if more than
50% of the value of the corporate unitholders stock is
owned directly or indirectly by five or fewer individuals or
some tax-exempt organizations, to the amount for which the
unitholder is considered to be at risk with respect
to our activities, if that is less than his tax basis. A
unitholder must recapture losses deducted in previous years to
the extent that distributions cause his at risk amount to be
less than zero at the end of any taxable year. Losses disallowed
to a unitholder or recaptured as a result of these limitations
will carry forward and will be allowable to the extent that his
tax basis or at risk amount, whichever is the limiting factor,
is subsequently increased. Upon the taxable disposition of a
unit, any gain recognized by a unitholder can be offset by
losses that were previously suspended by the at risk limitation
but may not be offset by losses suspended by the basis
limitation. Any excess suspended loss above that gain is no
longer utilizable. In general, a unitholder will be at risk to
the extent of the tax basis of his units, excluding any portion
of that basis attributable to his share of our nonrecourse
liabilities, reduced by any amount of money he borrows to
acquire or hold his units, if the lender of those borrowed funds
owns an interest in us, is related to the unitholder or can look
only to the units for repayment.
The passive loss limitations generally provide that individuals,
estates, trusts and some closely-held corporations and personal
service corporations can deduct losses from passive activities,
which generally are corporate or partnership activities in which
the taxpayer does not materially participate, only to the extent
of the taxpayers income from those passive activities. The
passive loss limitations are applied separately with respect to
each publicly traded partnership. Consequently, any passive
losses we generate will only be available to offset our passive
income generated in the future and will not be available to
offset income
174
from other passive activities or investments, including our
investments or investments in other publicly traded
partnerships, or salary or active business income. Passive
losses that are not deductible because they exceed a
unitholders share of income we generate may be deducted in
full when he disposes of his entire investment in us in a fully
taxable transaction with an unrelated party. The passive
activity loss rules are applied after other applicable
limitations on deductions, including the at risk rules and the
basis limitation.
Dual consolidated loss restrictions also may apply to limit the
deductibility by a corporate unitholder of losses we incur.
Corporate unitholders are urged to consult their own tax
advisors regarding the applicability and effect to them of dual
consolidated loss restrictions.
Limitations on Interest Deductions. The
deductibility of a non-corporate taxpayers
investment interest expense is generally limited to
the amount of that taxpayers net investment
income. Investment interest expense includes:
|
|
|
|
|
interest on indebtedness properly allocable to property held for
investment; |
|
|
|
our interest expense attributed to portfolio income; and |
|
|
|
the portion of interest expense incurred to purchase or carry an
interest in a passive activity to the extent attributable to
portfolio income. |
The computation of a unitholders investment interest
expense will take into account interest on any margin account
borrowing or other loan incurred to purchase or carry a unit.
Net investment income includes gross income from property held
for investment and amounts treated as portfolio income under the
passive loss rules, less deductible expenses, other than
interest, directly connected with the production of investment
income, but generally does not include gains attributable to the
disposition of property held for investment. The IRS has
indicated that net passive income earned by a publicly traded
partnership will be treated as investment income to its
unitholders. In addition, the unitholders share of our
portfolio income will be treated as investment income.
Entity-Level Collections. If we are required
or elect under applicable law to pay any U.S. federal,
state or local or foreign income or withholding taxes on behalf
of any present or former unitholder or the general partner, we
are authorized to pay those taxes from our funds. That payment,
if made, will be treated as a distribution of cash to the
partner on whose behalf the payment was made. If the payment is
made on behalf of a person whose identity cannot be determined,
we are authorized to treat the payment as a distribution to all
current unitholders. We are authorized to amend the partnership
agreement in the manner necessary to maintain uniformity of
intrinsic tax characteristics of units and to adjust later
distributions, so that after giving effect to these
distributions, the priority and characterization of
distributions otherwise applicable under the partnership
agreement are maintained as nearly as is practicable. Payments
by us as described above could give rise to an overpayment of
tax on behalf of an individual partner, in which event the
partner would be required to file a claim in order to obtain a
credit or refund of tax paid.
Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction. In
general, if we have a net profit, our items of income, gain,
loss, deduction and credit will be allocated among the general
partner and the unitholders in accordance with their percentage
interests in us. At any time that distributions are made to the
common units in excess of distributions to the subordinated
units, or incentive distributions are made to the general
partner, gross income will be allocated to the recipients to the
extent of these distributions. If we have a net loss for the
entire year, that loss generally will be allocated first to the
general partner and the unitholders in accordance with their
percentage interests in us to the extent of their positive
capital accounts and, second, to the general partner.
Specified items of our income, gain, loss and deduction will be
allocated to account for any difference between the tax basis
and fair market value of any property held by the partnership
immediately prior to this offering, referred to in this
discussion as Adjusted Property. The effect of these
allocations to a unitholder purchasing common units in this
offering will be essentially the same as if the tax basis of our
assets were equal to their fair market value at the time of this
offering. In addition, items of recapture
175
income will be allocated to the extent possible to the partner
who was allocated the deduction giving rise to the treatment of
that gain as recapture income in order to minimize the
recognition of ordinary income by some unitholders. Finally,
although we do not expect that our operations will result in the
creation of negative capital accounts, if negative capital
accounts nevertheless result, items of our income and gain will
be allocated in an amount and manner to eliminate the negative
balance as quickly as possible.
An allocation of items of our income, gain, loss, deduction or
credit, other than an allocation required by the Internal
Revenue Code to eliminate the difference between a
partners book capital account, which is
credited with the fair market value of Adjusted Property, and
tax capital account, which is credited with the tax
basis of Adjusted Property, referred to in this discussion as
the Book-Tax Disparity, will generally be given
effect for U.S. federal income tax purposes in determining
a partners share of an item of income, gain, loss,
deduction or credit only if the allocation has substantial
economic effect. In any other case, a partners share of an
item will be determined on the basis of his interest in us,
which will be determined by taking into account all the facts
and circumstances, including:
|
|
|
|
|
his relative contributions to us; |
|
|
|
the interests of all the partners in profits and losses; |
|
|
|
the interest of all the partners in cash flow; and |
|
|
|
the rights of all the partners to distributions of capital upon
liquidation. |
Perkins Coie LLP is of the opinion that, with the exception of
the issues described in Consequences of Unit
Ownership Section 754 Election and
Disposition of Common Units
Allocations Between Transferors and Transferees,
allocations under our partnership agreement will be given effect
for U.S. federal income tax purposes in determining a
partners share of an item of income, gain, loss, deduction
or credit.
Treatment of Short Sales. A unitholder whose units
are loaned to a short seller who sells such units
may be considered to have disposed of those units. If so, he
would no longer be a partner with respect to those units until
the termination of the loan and may recognize gain or loss from
the disposition. As a result:
|
|
|
|
|
any of our income, gain, loss, deduction or credit with respect
to the units may not be reportable by the unitholder who loaned
them; and |
|
|
|
any cash distributions received by such unitholder with respect
to those units may be fully taxable as ordinary income. |
Perkins Coie LLP has not rendered an opinion regarding the
treatment of a unitholder whose common units are loaned to a
short seller. Therefore, unitholders desiring to assure their
status as partners and avoid the risk of gain recognition from a
loan to a short seller are urged to ensure that any applicable
brokerage account agreements prohibit their brokers from
borrowing their units. The IRS has announced that it is actively
studying issues relating to the tax treatment of short sales of
partnership interests. Please also read
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Alternative Minimum Tax. Each unitholder will be
required to take into account his distributive share of any
items of our income, gain, loss, deduction or credit for
purposes of the alternative minimum tax. The current minimum tax
rate for noncorporate taxpayers is 26% on the first $175,000 of
alternative minimum taxable income in excess of the exemption
amount and 28% on any additional alternative minimum taxable
income. Prospective unitholders are urged to consult with their
tax advisors as to the impact of an investment in units on their
liability for the alternative minimum tax.
Tax Rates. The highest statutory rate of
U.S. federal income tax for individuals currently is 35%,
and the highest statutory rate of U.S. federal income tax
imposed on net capital gains of an individual currently is 15%
if the asset disposed of was held for more than one year at the
time of disposition.
176
Section 754 Election. Under current law, we
may, and intend to, make an election under Section 754 of
the Internal Revenue Code to adjust a common unit
purchasers U.S. federal income tax basis in our
assets (or inside basis) to reflect the purchasers
purchase price (or a Section 743(b) adjustment). The
Section 743(b) adjustment belongs to the purchaser and not
to other unitholders and does not apply to unitholders who
acquire their common units directly from us. For purposes of
this discussion, a unitholders inside basis in our assets
will be considered to have two components: (1) his share of
our tax basis in our assets (or common basis) and
(2) his Section 743(b) adjustment to that basis.
In general, a purchasers common basis is depreciated or
amortized according to the existing method utilized by us. A
positive Section 743(b) adjustment to that basis generally
is depreciated or amortized in the same manner as property of
the same type that has been newly placed in service by us. A
negative Section 743(b) adjustment to that basis generally
is recovered over the remaining useful life of the
partnerships recovery property.
A Section 743(b) adjustment is advantageous if the
purchasers tax basis in his units is higher than the
units share of the aggregate tax basis of our assets
immediately prior to the transfer. In that case, as a result of
the adjustment, the purchaser would have, among other items, a
greater amount of depreciation and amortization deductions and
his share of any gain or loss on a sale of our assets would be
less. Conversely, a Section 743(b) adjustment is
disadvantageous if the purchasers tax basis in his units
is lower than those units share of the aggregate tax basis
of our assets immediately prior to the purchase. Thus, the fair
market value of the units may be affected either favorably or
unfavorably by the Section 743(b) adjustment.
The calculations involved in the Section 743(b) adjustment
are complex and will be made on the basis of assumptions as to
the value of our assets and in accordance with the Internal
Revenue Code and applicable Treasury Regulations. We cannot
assure you that the determinations we make will not be
successfully challenged by the IRS and that the deductions
resulting from them will not be reduced or disallowed
altogether. Should the IRS require a different basis adjustment
to be made, and should, in our opinion, the expense of
compliance exceed the benefit of the election, we may seek
consent from the IRS to revoke our Section 754 election. If
such consent is given, a subsequent purchaser of units may be
allocated more income than he would have been allocated had the
election not been revoked.
Tax Treatment of Operations
Accounting Method and Taxable Year. We use the
year ending December 31 as our taxable year and the accrual
method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Each unitholder will be required to include in income his share
of our income, gain, loss, deduction and credit for our taxable
year ending within or with his taxable year. In addition, a
unitholder who disposes of all of his units must include his
share of our income, gain, loss, deduction and credit through
the date of disposition in income for his taxable year that
includes the date of disposition, with the result that a
unitholder who has a taxable year ending on a date other than
December 31 and who disposes of all of his units following
the close of our taxable year but before the close of his
taxable year must include his share of more than one year of our
income, gain, loss, deduction and credit in income for the year
of the disposition. Please read Disposition of
Common Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees.
Asset Tax Basis, Depreciation and Amortization.
The tax basis of our assets will be used for purposes of
computing depreciation and cost recovery deductions and,
ultimately, gain or loss on the disposition of these assets. The
U.S. federal income tax burden associated with any
difference between the fair market value of our assets and their
tax basis immediately prior to this offering will be borne by
the general partner and the existing limited partners. Please
read Consequences of Unit
Ownership Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and
Deduction.
To the extent allowable, we may elect to use the depreciation
and cost recovery methods that will result in the largest
deductions being taken in the early years after assets are
placed in service. Property we
177
subsequently acquire or construct may be depreciated using any
method permitted by the Internal Revenue Code.
If we dispose of depreciable property by sale, foreclosure or
otherwise, all or a portion of any gain, determined by reference
to the amount of depreciation previously deducted and the nature
of the property, may be subject to the recapture rules and taxed
as ordinary income rather than capital gain. Similarly, a
unitholder who has taken cost recovery or depreciation
deductions with respect to property we own will likely be
required to recapture some or all of those deductions as
ordinary income upon a sale of his interest in us. Please read
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction and
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
The costs incurred in selling our units (or syndication
expenses) must be capitalized and cannot be deducted
currently, ratably or upon our termination. There are
uncertainties regarding the classification of costs as
syndication expenses. The underwriting discounts and commissions
we incur will be treated as syndication expenses.
Valuation and Tax Basis of Our Properties. The
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of units will depend in part on our estimates of the
relative fair market values, and the initial tax bases, of our
assets. Although we may from time to time consult with
professional appraisers regarding valuation matters, we will
make many of the relative fair market value estimates ourselves.
These estimates and determinations of basis are subject to
challenge and will not be binding on the IRS or the courts. If
the estimates of fair market value or basis are later found to
be incorrect, the character and amount of items of income, gain,
loss, deductions or credits previously reported by unitholders
might change, and unitholders might be required to adjust their
tax liability for prior years and incur interest and penalties
with respect to those adjustments.
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss. In general, gain or
loss will be recognized on a sale of units equal to the
difference between the amount realized and the unitholders
tax basis in the units sold. A unitholders amount realized
will be measured by the sum of the cash or the fair market value
of other property received by him plus his share of our
nonrecourse liabilities. Because the amount realized includes a
unitholders share of our nonrecourse liabilities, the gain
recognized on the sale of units could result in a tax liability
in excess of any cash received from the sale.
Prior distributions from us in excess of cumulative net taxable
income for a common unit that decreased a unitholders tax
basis in that common unit will, in effect, become taxable income
if the common unit is sold at a price greater than the
unitholders tax basis in that common unit, even if the
price received is less than his original cost. Except as noted
below, gain or loss recognized by a unitholder on the sale or
exchange of a unit generally will be taxable as capital gain or
loss. Capital gain recognized by an individual on the sale of
units held more than one year generally will be taxed at a
maximum rate of 15%.
A portion of a unitholders amount realized may be
allocable to unrealized receivables or to
inventory items we own. The term unrealized
receivables includes potential recapture items, including
depreciation recapture. A unitholder will recognize ordinary
income or loss to the extent of the difference between the
portion of the unitholders amount realized allocable to
unrealized receivables or inventory items and the
unitholders share of our basis in such receivables or
inventory items. Ordinary income attributable to unrealized
receivables, inventory items and depreciation recapture may
exceed net taxable gain realized upon the sale of a unit and may
be recognized even if there is a net taxable loss realized on
the sale of a unit. Thus, a unitholder may recognize both
ordinary income and a capital loss upon a sale of units. Net
capital losses generally may only be used to offset capital
gains. An exception permits individuals to offset up to $3,000
of net capital losses against ordinary income in any given year.
The IRS has ruled that a partner who acquires interests in a
partnership in separate transactions must combine those
interests and maintain a single adjusted tax basis for all those
interests. Upon a sale or
178
other disposition of less than all of those interests, a portion
of that tax basis must be allocated to the interests sold using
an equitable apportionment method. Treasury
Regulations under Section 1223 of the Internal Revenue Code
allow a selling unitholder who can identify common units
transferred with an ascertainable holding period to elect to use
the actual holding period of the common units transferred. Thus,
according to the ruling, a common unitholder will be unable to
select high or low basis common units to sell as would be the
case with corporate stock, but, according to the regulations,
may designate specific common units sold for purposes of
determining the holding period of units transferred. A
unitholder electing to use the actual holding period of common
units transferred must consistently use that identification
method for all subsequent sales or exchanges of common units. A
unitholder considering the purchase of additional units or a
sale of common units purchased in separate transactions is urged
to consult his tax advisor as to the possible consequences of
this ruling and application of the regulations.
Specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code affect the
taxation of some financial products and securities, including
partnership interests, by treating a taxpayer as having sold an
appreciated partnership interest, one in which gain
would be recognized if it were sold, assigned or terminated at
its fair market value, if the taxpayer or related persons
enter(s) into:
|
|
|
|
|
a short sale; |
|
|
|
an offsetting notional principal contract; or |
|
|
|
a futures or forward contract with respect to the partnership
interest or substantially identical property. |
Moreover, if a taxpayer has previously entered into a short
sale, an offsetting notional principal contract or a futures or
forward contract with respect to the partnership interest, the
taxpayer will be treated as having sold that position if the
taxpayer or a related person then acquires the partnership
interest or substantially identical property. The Secretary of
the Treasury is also authorized to issue regulations that treat
a taxpayer that enters into transactions or positions that have
substantially the same effect as the preceding transactions as
having constructively sold the financial position.
Allocations Between Transferors and Transferees.
In general, our taxable income or loss will be determined
annually, will be prorated on a monthly basis and will be
subsequently apportioned among the unitholders in proportion to
the number of units owned by each of them as of the opening of
the applicable exchange on the first business day of the month.
However, gain or loss realized on a sale or other disposition of
our assets other than in the ordinary course of business will be
allocated among the unitholders on the first business day of the
month in which that gain or loss is recognized. As a result of
the foregoing, a unitholder transferring units may be allocated
income, gain, loss, deduction and credit realized after the date
of transfer.
The use of this method for allocating income and deductions
among unitholders may not be permitted under existing Treasury
Regulations. Accordingly, Perkins Coie LLP is unable to opine on
its validity. If this method were disallowed or applied only to
transfers of less than all of the unitholders interest,
our taxable income or losses may be reallocated among the
unitholders. We are authorized to revise our method of
allocation to conform to a method permitted under any future
Treasury Regulations or administrative guidance.
A unitholder who owns units at any time during a calendar
quarter and who disposes of them prior to the record date set
for a cash distribution for that quarter will be allocated items
of our income, gain, loss and deductions attributable to months
within that quarter in which the units were held but will not be
entitled to receive that cash distribution.
Transfer Notification Requirements. A unitholder
who sells any of his units, other than through a broker,
generally is required to notify us in writing of that sale
within 30 days after the sale (or, if earlier, January 15
of the year following the sale). A unitholder who acquires units
generally is required to notify us in writing of that
acquisition within 30 days after the purchase, unless a
broker or nominee will satisfy such requirement. We are required
to notify the IRS of any such transfers of units and to furnish
specified
179
information to the transferor and transferee. Failure to notify
us of a transfer of units may lead to the imposition of
substantial penalties.
Constructive Termination. We will be considered to
have been terminated for tax purposes if there is a sale or
exchange of 50% or more of the total interests in our capital
and profits within a 12-month period. A constructive termination
results in the closing of our taxable year for all unitholders.
In the case of a unitholder reporting on a taxable year other
than a fiscal year ending December 31, the closing of our
taxable year may result in more than 12 months of our
taxable income or loss being includable in his taxable income
for the year of termination. We would be required to make new
tax elections after a termination, including a new election
under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code, and a
termination would result in a deferral of our deductions for
depreciation. A termination could also result in penalties if we
were unable to determine that the termination had occurred.
Moreover, a termination might either accelerate the application
of, or subject us to, tax legislation applicable to a newly
formed partnership.
Foreign Tax Credit Considerations
Subject to detailed limitations set forth in the Internal
Revenue Code, a unitholder may elect to claim a credit against
his liability for U.S. federal income tax for his share of
foreign income taxes (and certain foreign taxes imposed in lieu
of a tax based upon income) paid by us (please read
Business Taxation of the Partnership).
Income allocated to unitholders likely will constitute foreign
source income falling in the residual foreign tax credit
category (or general basket) for purposes of the
U.S. foreign tax credit limitation. The rules relating to
the determination of the foreign tax credit are complex and
prospective unitholders are urged to consult their own tax
advisors to determine whether or to what extent they would be
entitled to such credit. Unitholders who do not elect to claim
foreign tax credits may instead claim a deduction for their
shares of foreign taxes paid by us.
Tax-Exempt Organizations and Non-U.S. Investors
Investments in units by employee benefit plans, other tax-exempt
organizations and non-U.S. persons, including nonresident
aliens of the United States, non-U.S. corporations and
non-U.S. trusts and estates (collectively,
non-U.S. unitholders) raise issues unique to those
investors and, as described below, may result in substantially
adverse tax consequences to them.
Employee benefit plans and most other organizations exempt from
U.S. federal income tax, including individual retirement
accounts and other retirement plans, are subject to
U.S. federal income tax on unrelated business taxable
income. Virtually all of our income allocated to a unitholder
that is a tax-exempt organization will be unrelated business
taxable income to them subject to U.S. federal income tax.
A non-U.S. unitholder may be subject to a 4%
U.S. federal income tax on his share of the
U.S. source portion of our gross income attributable to
transportation that begins or ends (but not both) in the United
States, unless either (a) an exemption applies and he files
a U.S. federal income tax return to claim that exemption or
(b) that income is effectively connected with the conduct
of a trade or business in the United States (or
U.S. effectively connected income). For this
purpose, transportation income includes income from the use,
hiring or leasing of a vessel to transport cargo, or the
performance of services directly related to the use of any
vessel to transport cargo. The U.S. source portion of our
transportation income is deemed to be 50% of the income
attributable to voyages that begin or end in the United States.
Generally, no amount of the income from voyages that begin and
end outside the United States is treated as U.S. source,
and consequently none of our transportation income attributable
to such voyages is subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Although the entire amount of transportation income from voyages
that begin and end in the United States would be fully taxable
in the United States, we currently do not expect to have any
transportation income from voyages that begin and end in the
United States; however, there is no assurance that such voyages
will not occur.
We may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax,
computed at the highest statutory rate, from cash distributions
to non-U.S. unitholders with respect to their shares of our
income that is U.S. effectively connected income. Our
transportation income generally should not be treated as
180
U.S. effectively connected income unless we have a fixed
place of business in the United States involved in the earning
of that transportation income and certain other requirements are
satisfied. While we do not expect to have a fixed place of
business in the United States, there can be no guarantee that
this will not change. Under a ruling of the IRS, a portion of
any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of a unit
by a non-U.S. unitholder may be treated as
U.S. effectively connected income to the extent we have a
fixed place of business in the United States and a sale of our
assets would have given rise to U.S. effectively connected
income. A non-U.S. unitholder would be required to file a
U.S. federal income tax return to report his
U.S. effectively connected income (including his share of
any such income earned by us) and to pay U.S. federal
income tax, or claim a credit or refund for tax withheld on such
income. Further, unless an exemption applies, a
non-U.S. corporation investing in units may be subject to a
branch profits tax, at a 30% rate or lower rate prescribed by a
treaty, with respect to its U.S. effectively connected
income.
A non-U.S. unitholder may be entitled to an exemption from
the 4% U.S. federal income tax or a refund of tax withheld
on U.S. effectively connected income that constitutes
transportation income if any of the following applies:
(1) such non-U.S. unitholder qualifies for an
exemption from this tax under an income tax treaty between the
United States and the country where such
non-U.S. unitholder is resident; (2) in the case of an
individual non-U.S. unitholder, he qualifies for the
exemption from tax under Section 872(b)(1) of the Internal
Revenue Code as a resident of a country that grants an
equivalent exemption from tax to residents of the United States;
or (3) in the case of a corporate non-U.S. unitholder,
it qualifies for the exemption from tax under Section 883
of the Internal Revenue Code (or the Section 883
Exemption) (for the rules relating to qualification for the
Section 883 Exemption, please read below under
Possible Classification as a
Corporation The Section 883 Exemption).
Non-U.S. unitholders must apply for and obtain a
U.S. taxpayer identification number in order to file
U.S. federal income tax returns and must provide that
identification number to us for purposes of any
U.S. federal income tax information returns we may be
required to file. Non-U.S. unitholders are encouraged to
consult with their own tax advisors regarding the
U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences of an
investment in units and any filing requirements related thereto.
Functional Currency
We are required to determine our functional currency for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and report our affairs in
this functional currency to our unitholders. In addition, we are
required to determine whether any of our operations constitutes
a separate qualified business unit (or QBU) for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and, if so, whether the
functional currency of any QBU differs from our functional
currency. Any transactions conducted by us or a QBU other than
in a functional currency may give rise to foreign currency
exchange gain or loss. Further, if we are or a QBU is required
to maintain a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar, a unitholder may be required to recognize
foreign currency translation income or loss upon the sale of
units or upon distributions of money or property by us or a QBU.
For purposes of the foreign currency rules described immediately
above, a QBU includes a separate trade or business owned by a
partnership in the event separate books and records are
maintained for that separate trade or business. In addition, a
partnership is a QBU of a partner. The functional currency of a
QBU is determined based upon the economic environment in which
the QBU operates. Thus, a QBU whose revenues and expenses are
primarily determined in a currency other than the
U.S. dollar will have a non-U.S. dollar functional
currency.
We believe that our functional currency is the U.S. dollar,
but that certain of our operations constitute separate QBUs
whose functional currencies are other than the U.S. dollar.
In such case, a unitholder generally will be required to
recognize a certain amount of foreign currency translation
income or loss upon the sale of units or upon our receipt of
distributions of money or property from a QBU. Foreign currency
translation income or loss will be treated as ordinary income or
loss. Under proposed regulations (or the Section 987
Proposed Regulations), the amount of translation income or
loss recognized will reflect the appreciation or depreciation in
the functional currency value of capital invested
181
in and profits retained by the QBU between the time the
unitholder purchased his units and the time we receive
distributions from such QBU, the unitholder receives
distributions from us or the unitholder sells his units.
Based upon our current projections of the capital invested in
and profits of our non-U.S. dollar QBUs, we believe that
unitholders will be required to recognize only a nominal amount
of foreign currency translation income or loss each year and
upon their sale of units. Nonetheless, the rules for determining
the amount of translation income presently are not entirely
clear as the Section 987 Proposed Regulations are not
currently effective and the Treasury Department has recently
indicated that it intends to review and possibly replace the
Section 987 Proposed Regulations. Please consult your own
tax advisor for specific advice regarding the application of the
rules for recognizing foreign currency translation income or
loss under your own circumstances.
In addition to a unitholders recognition of foreign
currency translation income or loss, we will engage in certain
transactions denominated in the Euro, and consequently, we
expect to recognize a certain amount of foreign currency
exchange gain or loss each year. This foreign currency exchange
gain or loss will be treated as ordinary income or loss.
Administrative Matters
Information Returns and Audit Procedures. We
intend to furnish to each unitholder, within 90 days after
the close of each calendar year, specific U.S. federal
income tax information, including a document in the form of IRS
Form 1065, Schedule K-1, which sets forth his share of
our income, gain, loss, deductions and credits as computed for
U.S. federal income tax purposes for our preceding taxable
year. In preparing this information, which will not be reviewed
by counsel, we will take various accounting and reporting
positions, some of which have been mentioned earlier, to
determine his share of such income, gain, loss, deduction and
credit. We cannot assure you that those positions will yield a
result that conforms to the requirements of the Internal Revenue
Code, regulations or administrative interpretations of the IRS.
Neither we nor Perkins Coie LLP can assure prospective
unitholders that the IRS will not successfully contend in court
that those positions are impermissible. Any challenge by the IRS
could negatively affect the value of the units.
We will be obligated to file U.S. federal income tax
information returns with the IRS for any year in which we earn
any U.S. source income or U.S. effectively connected
income. In the event we were obligated to file a
U.S. federal income tax information return but failed to do
so, unitholders would not be entitled to claim any deductions,
losses or credits for U.S. federal income tax purposes
relating to us. Consequently, we may file U.S. federal
income tax information returns for any given year. The IRS may
audit any such information returns that we file. Adjustments
resulting from an IRS audit of our return may require each
unitholder to adjust a prior years tax liability, and may
result in an audit of his return. Any audit of a
unitholders return could result in adjustments not related
to our returns as well as those related to our returns. Any IRS
audit relating to our items of income, gain, loss, deduction or
credit for years in which we are not required to file and do not
file a U.S. federal income tax information return would be
conducted at the partner-level, and each unitholder may be
subject to separate audit proceedings relating to such items.
For years in which we file or are required to file
U.S. federal income tax information returns, we will be
treated as a separate entity for purposes of any
U.S. federal income tax audits, as well as for purposes of
judicial review of administrative adjustments by the IRS and tax
settlement proceedings. For such years, the tax treatment of
partnership items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit
will be determined in a partnership proceeding rather than in
separate proceedings with the partners. The Internal Revenue
Code requires that one partner be designated as the Tax
Matters Partner for these purposes. The partnership
agreement names Teekay GP L.L.C. as our Tax Matters Partner.
The Tax Matters Partner will make some U.S. federal tax
elections on our behalf and on behalf of unitholders. In
addition, the Tax Matters Partner can extend the statute of
limitations for assessment of tax deficiencies against
unitholders for items reported in the information returns we
file. The Tax Matters
182
Partner may bind a unitholder with less than a 1% profits
interest in us to a settlement with the IRS with respect to
these items unless that unitholder elects, by filing a statement
with the IRS, not to give that authority to the Tax Matters
Partner. The Tax Matters Partner may seek judicial review, by
which all the unitholders are bound, of a final partnership
administrative adjustment and, if the Tax Matters Partner fails
to seek judicial review, judicial review may be sought by any
unitholder having at least a 1% interest in profits or by any
group of unitholders having in the aggregate at least a 5%
interest in profits. However, only one action for judicial
review will go forward, and each unitholder with an interest in
the outcome may participate.
A unitholder must file a statement with the IRS identifying the
treatment of any item on his U.S. federal income tax return
that is not consistent with the treatment of the item on an
information return that we file. Intentional or negligent
disregard of this consistency requirement may subject a
unitholder to substantial penalties.
Special Reporting Requirements for Owners of
Non-U.S. Partnerships. A U.S. person who
either contributes more than $100,000 to us (when added to the
value of any other property contributed to us by such person or
a related person during the previous 12 months), or
following a contribution owns, directly, indirectly or by
attribution from certain related persons, at least a 10%
interest in us, is required to file IRS Form 8865 with his
U.S. federal income tax return for the year of the
contribution to report the contribution and provide certain
details about himself and certain related persons, us and any
persons that own a 10% or greater direct interest in us. We will
provide each unitholder with the necessary information about us
and those persons who own a 10% or greater direct interest in us
along with the Schedule K-1 information described
previously.
In addition to the foregoing, a U.S. person who directly
owns at least a 10% interest in us may be required to make
additional disclosures on IRS Form 8865 in the event such
person acquires, disposes or has his interest in us
substantially increased or reduced. Further, a U.S. person
who directly, indirectly or by attribution from certain related
persons, owns at least a 10% interest in us may be required to
make additional disclosures on IRS Form 8865 in the event
such person, when considered together with any other
U.S. persons who own at least a 10% interest in us, owns a
greater than 50% interest in us. For these purposes, an
interest in us generally is defined to include an
interest in our capital or profits or an interest in our
deductions or losses.
Significant penalties may apply for failing to satisfy IRS
Form 8865 filing requirements and thus unitholders are
advised to contact their tax advisors to determine the
application of these filing requirements under their own
circumstances.
Accuracy-related Penalties. An additional tax
equal to 20% of the amount of any portion of an underpayment of
U.S. federal income tax that is attributable to one or more
specified causes, including negligence or disregard of rules or
regulations and substantial understatements of income tax, is
imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. No penalty will be
imposed, however, for any portion of an underpayment if it is
shown that there was a reasonable cause for that portion and
that the taxpayer acted in good faith regarding that portion.
A substantial understatement of income tax in any taxable year
exists if the amount of the understatement exceeds the greater
of 10% of the tax required to be shown on the return for the
taxable year or $5,000. The amount of any understatement subject
to penalty generally is reduced if any portion is attributable
to a position adopted on the return:
(1) for which there is, or was, substantial
authority; or
(2) as to which there is a reasonable basis and the
pertinent facts of that position are disclosed on the return.
More stringent rules, including additional penalties and
extended statutes of limitations, may apply as a result of our
participation in listed transactions or
reportable transactions with a significant tax avoidance
purpose. While we do not anticipate participating in such
transactions, if any item of income,
183
gain, loss, deduction or credit included in the distributive
shares of unitholders for a given year might result in an
understatement of income relating to such a
transaction, we will disclose the pertinent facts on a
U.S. federal income tax information return for such year.
In such event, we also will make a reasonable effort to furnish
sufficient information for unitholders to make adequate
disclosure on their returns and to take other actions as may be
appropriate to permit unitholders to avoid liability for
penalties.
Possible Classification as a Corporation
If we fail to meet the Qualifying Income Exception described
previously with respect to our classification as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, other than a failure
that is determined by the IRS to be inadvertent and that is
cured within a reasonable time after discovery, we will be
treated as a non-U.S. corporation for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. If previously treated as a partnership, our
change in status would be deemed to have been effected by our
transfer of all of our assets, subject to liabilities, to a
newly formed non-U.S. corporation, in return for stock in
that corporation, and then our distribution of that stock to our
unitholders and other owners in liquidation of their interests
in us. Unitholders that are U.S. persons would be required
to file IRS Form 926 to report these deemed transfers and
any other transfers they made to us while we were treated as a
corporation and may be required to recognize income or gain for
U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of certain
prior deductions or losses and other items. Substantial
penalties may apply for failure to satisfy these reporting
requirements, unless the person otherwise required to report
shows such failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful
neglect.
If we were treated as a corporation in any taxable year, either
as a result of a failure to meet the Qualifying Income Exception
or otherwise, our items of income, gain, loss, deduction and
credit would not pass through to unitholders. Instead, we would
be subject to U.S. federal income tax based on the rules
applicable to foreign corporations, not partnerships, and such
items would be treated as our own. Any distribution made to a
unitholder would be treated as either taxable dividend income,
to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and
profits, or, in the absence of earnings and profits, a
nontaxable return of capital, to the extent of the
unitholders tax basis in his common units, or taxable
capital gain, after the unitholders tax basis in his
common units is reduced to zero. Section 743(b) adjustments
to the basis of our assets would no longer be available to
purchasers in the marketplace. Please read
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Section 754 Election.
|
|
|
Taxation of Operating Income |
In the event we were treated as a corporation, our operating
income may be subject to U.S. federal income taxation under
one of two alternative tax regimes (the 4% gross basis tax or
the net basis tax, as described below).
We may be subject to a 4% U.S. federal income tax on the
U.S. source portion of our gross income (without benefit of
deductions) attributable to transportation that begins or ends
(but not both) in the United States, unless the Section 883
Exemption applies (as more fully described below under
The Section 883 Exemption) and we
file a U.S. federal income tax return to claim that
exemption. For this purpose, gross income attributable to
transportation (or transportation income) includes income
from the use, hiring or leasing of a vessel to transport cargo,
or the performance of services directly related to the use of
any vessel to transport cargo, and thus includes time charter or
bareboat charter income. The U.S. source portion of our
transportation income is deemed to be 50% of the income
attributable to voyages that begin or end (but not both) in the
United States. Generally, no amount of the income from voyages
that begin and end outside the United States is treated as
U.S. source, and consequently none of the transportation
income attributable to such voyages is subject to
U.S. federal income tax. Although the entire amount of
transportation income from voyages that begin and end in the
United States would be fully taxable in the United States, we
currently do not expect to have any transportation income from
184
voyages that begin and end in the United States; however, there
is no assurance that such voyages will not occur.
|
|
|
Net Income Tax and Branch Tax Regime |
We currently do not expect to have a fixed place of business in
the United States. Nonetheless, if this were to change or we
otherwise were treated as having such a fixed place of business
involved in earning U.S. source transportation income, such
transportation income may be treated as effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States.
Any income that we earn that is treated as U.S. effectively
connected income would be subject to U.S. federal corporate
income tax (the highest statutory rate is currently 35%), unless
the Section 883 Exemption (as discussed below) applied. The
4% U.S. federal income tax described above is inapplicable
to U.S. effectively connected income, however.
Unless the Section 883 Exemption applied, a 30% branch
profits tax imposed under Section 884 of the Internal
Revenue Code also would apply to our earnings that result from
U.S. effectively connected income, and a branch interest
tax could be imposed on certain interest paid or deemed paid by
us. Furthermore, on the sale of a vessel that has produced
U.S. effectively connected income, we could be subject to
the net basis corporate income tax and to the 30% branch profits
tax with respect to our gain not in excess of certain prior
deductions for depreciation that reduced U.S. effectively
connected income. Otherwise, we would not be subject to
U.S. federal income tax with respect to gain realized on
sale of a vessel because it is expected that any sale of a
vessel will be structured so that it is considered to occur
outside of the United States and so that it is not attributable
to an office or other fixed place of business in the United
States.
|
|
|
The Section 883 Exemption |
In general, if a non-U.S. corporation satisfies the
requirements of Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code
and the regulations thereunder (or the Final Section 883
Regulations), it will not be subject to the 4% gross basis tax
or the net basis tax described above on its U.S. source
transportation income attributable to voyages that begin or end
(but not both) in the United States (or U.S. Source
International Shipping Income).
A non-U.S. corporation will qualify for the
Section 883 Exemption if, among other things, it is
organized in a jurisdiction outside the United States that
grants an equivalent exemption from tax to corporations
organized in the United States (or an Equivalent
Exemption), it meets one of three ownership tests described
below: (1) the more than 50% ownership test (or the
Ownership Test); (2) the Publicly Traded
Test; or (3) the controlled foreign corporation
test (or the CFC Test) and certain
substantiation, reporting and other requirements are met.
In order to satisfy the Ownership Test, a
non-U.S. corporation must be able to substantiate that more
than 50% of the value of its stock is owned, directly or
indirectly applying attribution rules, by qualified
shareholders for at least half of the number of days in
the non-U.S. corporations taxable year, and the
non-U.S. corporation must comply with certain
substantiation and reporting requirements. For this purpose,
qualified shareholders are individuals who are residents (as
defined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) of countries
that grant an Equivalent Exemption, non-U.S. corporations
that meet the Publicly Traded Test of the Final Section 883
Regulations and are organized in countries that grant an
Equivalent Exemption, or certain foreign governments, non profit
organizations and certain beneficiaries of foreign pension
funds. Unitholders who are citizens or residents of the United
States or are domestic corporations are not qualified
shareholders.
In addition, a corporation claiming the Section 883
Exemption based on the Ownership Test must obtain statements
from the holders relied upon to satisfy the Ownership Test,
signed under penalty of perjury, including the owners
name, permanent address and country where the individual is
fully liable to tax, if any, a description of the owners
ownership interest in the non-U.S. corporation, including
information regarding ownership in any intermediate entities,
and certain other information. In addition, we would be required
to file a U.S. federal income tax return and list on our
U.S. federal income tax return
185
the name and address of each unitholder holding 5% or more of
the value of our units who is relied upon to meet the Ownership
Test.
The Publicly Traded Test requires that one or more classes of
equity representing more than 50% of the voting power and value
in a non-U.S. corporation be primarily and regularly
traded on an established securities market either in the
U.S. or in a foreign country that grants an Equivalent
Exemption. For this purpose, if one or more 5% shareholders
(i.e., a shareholder holding, actually or constructively, at
least 5% of the vote and value of a class of equity) own in the
aggregate 50% or more of the vote and value of a class of
equity, such class of equity will not be treated as primarily
and regularly traded on an established securities market.
The CFC Test requires that the non-U.S. corporation be
treated as a controlled foreign corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and an income inclusion
test is met (for the definition of controlled foreign
corporation please read the discussion below under
Consequences of Possible Controlled Foreign
Corporation Classification).
We are organized under the laws of the Republic of The Marshall
Islands. The U.S. Treasury Department has recognized the
Republic of The Marshall Islands as a jurisdiction that grants
an Equivalent Exemption. Consequently, in the event we were
treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, our U.S. Source International Shipping Income
(including for this purpose, any such income earned by our
subsidiaries that have properly elected to be treated as
partnerships or disregarded as entities separate from us for
U.S. federal income tax purposes), would be exempt from
U.S. federal income taxation provided we meet the Ownership
Test or we satisfy either the CFC Test or the Publicly Traded
Test. We do not believe that we will meet the CFC Test, as we do
not expect to be a CFC (please read below under
Consequences of Possible Controlled Foreign
Corporation Classification), and while not completely
clear, we may not meet the Publicly Traded Test due to Teekay
Shipping Corporations substantial indirect ownership of
us. Nonetheless, as of the date of this prospectus, we believe
that we should satisfy the Ownership Test based upon the
ownership immediately after the offering of more than 50% of the
value of us by Teekay Shipping Corporation.
Based on information provided by Teekay Shipping Corporation,
Teekay Shipping Corporation is organized in the Republic of The
Marshall Islands and meets the Publicly Traded Test under
current law and under the Final Section 883 Regulations. As
long as Teekay Shipping Corporation owns more than 50% of the
value of us and satisfies the Publicly Traded Test, we will
satisfy the Ownership Test and will qualify for the
Section 883 Exemption, provided that Teekay Shipping
Corporation provides properly completed ownership statements to
us as required under the Final Section 883 Regulations and
we satisfy certain substantiation and documentation
requirements. As of the date hereof, Teekay Shipping Corporation
would be willing to provide us with such ownership statements as
long as it is a qualifying shareholder. There is no assurance
that Teekay Shipping Corporation will continue to satisfy the
requirements for being a qualified shareholder of us (i.e., it
will meet the Publicly Traded Test) or that it alone will own
more than 50% of the value of our units. At some time in the
future, it may become necessary for us to look to our other
non-U.S. unitholders to determine whether more than 50% of
our units, by value, are owned by non-U.S. unitholders who
are qualifying shareholders and certain
non-U.S. unitholders may be asked to provide ownership
statements, signed under penalty of perjury, with respect to
their investment in our units in order for us to qualify for the
Section 883 Exemption. If we cannot obtain these statements
from unitholders holding, in the aggregate, more than 50% of the
value of our units, under the Final Section 883
Regulations, we would not be eligible to claim the
Section 883 Exemption, and, therefore, we would be required
to pay a 4% tax on the gross amount of our U.S. Source
International Shipping Income, thereby reducing the amount of
cash available for distribution to unitholders.
The determination of whether we will satisfy the Ownership Test
at any given time depends upon a multitude of factors, including
Teekay Shipping Corporations ownership of us, whether
Teekay Shipping Corporations stock is publicly traded, the
concentration of ownership of Teekay Shipping Corporations
own stock and the satisfaction of various substantiation and
documentation requirements. There can be no assurance that we
will satisfy these requirements at any given time and thus that
our U.S. Source
186
International Shipping Income would be exempt from
U.S. federal income taxation by reason of Section 883
in any of our taxable years if we were treated as a corporation.
|
|
|
Consequences of Possible PFIC Classification |
A non-United States entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes will be a PFIC in any
taxable year in which, after taking into account the income and
assets of the corporation and certain subsidiaries pursuant to a
look through rule, either (1) at least 75% of
its gross income is passive income (or the income
test) or (2) at least 50% of the average value of its
assets is attributable to assets that produce passive income or
are held for the production of passive income (or the assets
test).
Based upon our current assets and operations, we do not believe
that we would be considered to be a PFIC even if we were treated
as a corporation. There are, however, legal uncertainties
involved and, in addition, there is no assurance that the nature
of our assets, income and operations will remain the same in the
future. We are not relying on an opinion of counsel on this
issue. Therefore, there is a meaningful risk that the IRS would
consider us to be a PFIC, and no assurance can be given that we
would not become a PFIC in the future, in the event we were
treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
If we were classified as a PFIC, for any year during which a
unitholder owns units, he generally will be subject to special
rules (regardless of whether we continue thereafter to be a
PFIC) with respect to (1) any excess
distribution (generally, any distribution received by a
unitholder in a taxable year that is greater than 125% of the
average annual distributions received by the unitholder in the
three preceding taxable years or, if shorter, the
unitholders holding period for the units) and (2) any
gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of units. Under
these rules:
|
|
|
|
|
the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over
the unitholders holding period; |
|
|
|
the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any year
prior to the first year in which we were a PFIC will be taxed as
ordinary income in the current year; |
|
|
|
the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years in the
unitholders holding period will be subject to
U.S. federal income tax at the highest rate in effect for
the applicable class of taxpayer for that year; and |
|
|
|
an interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit will be
imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each
of these other taxable years. |
Certain elections, such as a qualified electing fund (or
QEF) election or mark to market election, may be
available to a unitholder if we were classified as a PFIC. If we
determine that we are or will be a PFIC, we will provide
unitholders with information concerning the potential
availability of such elections.
Under current law, dividends received by individual citizens or
residents of the United States from domestic corporations and
qualified foreign corporations generally are treated as net
capital gains and subject to U.S. federal income tax at
reduced rates (generally 15%). However, if we were classified as
a PFIC for our taxable year in which we pay a dividend, we would
not be considered a qualified foreign corporation, and
individuals receiving such dividends would not be eligible for
the reduced rate of U.S. federal income tax.
187
|
|
|
Consequences of Possible Controlled Foreign Corporation
Classification |
If more than 50% of either the total combined voting power of
our outstanding units entitled to vote or the total value of all
of our outstanding units were owned, actually or constructively,
by citizens or residents of the United States,
U.S. partnerships or corporations, or U.S. estates or
trusts (as defined for U.S. federal income tax purposes),
each of which owned, actually or constructively, 10% or more of
the total combined voting power of our outstanding units
entitled to vote (each, a U.S. Shareholder), we
could be treated as a controlled foreign corporation (or
CFC) at any such time as we are properly classified as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
U.S. Shareholders of a CFC are treated as receiving current
distributions of their shares of certain income of the CFC (not
including, under current law, certain undistributed earnings
attributable to shipping income) without regard to any actual
distributions and are subject to other burdensome
U.S. federal income tax and administrative requirements but
generally are not also subject to the requirements generally
applicable to owners of a PFIC. Although we do not believe we
will be a CFC following the Offering, U.S. persons
purchasing a substantial interest in us should consider the
potential implications of being treated as a
U.S. Shareholder in the event we were a CFC in the future.
188
NON-UNITED STATES TAX CONSEQUENCES
Marshall Islands Tax Consequences
The following discussion is based upon the opinion of Watson,
Farley & Williams (New York) LLP, our counsel as to
matters of the laws of the Republic of The Marshall Islands,
regarding the material Marshall Islands tax consequences of our
activities to holders of our common units who do not reside in,
maintain offices in or engage in business in the Marshall
Islands.
Because we and our subsidiaries do not, and we do not expect
that we and our subsidiaries will, conduct business or
operations in the Marshall Islands, and because all
documentation related to this offering will be executed outside
of the Marshall Islands, under current Marshall Islands law you
will not be subject to Marshall Islands taxation or withholding
on distributions, including upon a return of capital, we make to
you as a unitholder. In addition, you will not be subject to
Marshall Islands stamp, capital gains or other taxes on the
purchase, ownership or disposition of common units, and you will
not be required by the Republic of The Marshall Islands to file
a tax return relating to the common units.
It is the responsibility of each unitholder to investigate the
legal and tax consequences, under the laws of pertinent
jurisdictions, including the Marshall Islands, of his investment
in us. Accordingly, each prospective unitholder is urged to
consult, and depend upon, his tax counsel or other advisor with
regard to those matters. Further, it is the responsibility of
each unitholder to file all state, local and non-U.S., as well
as U.S. federal tax returns, that may be required of him.
Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following discussion is a summary of the material Canadian
federal income tax consequences under the Income Tax Act
(Canada) (or the Canada Tax Act), as of the date of this
prospectus, that we believe are relevant to holders of common
units acquired in this offering who are, at all relevant times,
for the purposes of the Canada Tax Act and the Canada-United
States Tax Convention 1980 (or the
Canada-U.S. Treaty) resident in the United States
and who deal at arms length with us and Teekay Shipping
Corporation (or U.S. Resident Holders).
Under the Canada Tax Act, no taxes on income (including taxable
capital gains) are payable by U.S. Resident Holders in
respect of the acquisition, holding, disposition or redemption
of the common units, provided that we do not carry on business
in Canada and such U.S. Resident Holders do not, for the
purposes of the Canada-U.S. Treaty, otherwise have a
permanent establishment or fixed base in Canada to which such
common units pertain and, in addition, do not use or hold and
are not deemed or considered to use or hold such common units in
the course of carrying on a business in Canada and, in the case
of any U.S. Resident Holders that carry on an insurance
business in Canada and elsewhere, such U.S. Resident
Holders establish that the common units are not effectively
connected with their insurance business carried on in Canada.
In this connection, we believe that our activities and affairs
can be conducted in a manner that we will not be carrying on
business in Canada and that U.S. Resident Holders should
not be considered to be carrying on business in Canada for
purposes of the Canada Tax Act solely by reason of the
acquisition, holding, disposition or redemption of their common
units. We intend that this is and continues to be the case,
notwithstanding that certain services will be provided to Teekay
LNG Partners L.P., indirectly through arrangements with Teekay
Shipping Limited (a subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation
that is resident and based in the Bahamas), by Canadian service
providers, as discussed below.
Under the Canada Tax Act, a resident of Canada (which may
include a foreign corporation the central management and control
of which is in Canada) is subject to Canadian tax on its
world-wide income, subject to any relief that may be provided by
any relevant tax treaty. A non-resident corporation or
individual that carries on a business in Canada directly or
through a partnership is, subject to any relevant tax treaty,
subject to tax in Canada on income attributable to its business
(or that of the partnerships, as the case may be) carried
on in Canada. The Canada Tax Act contains special rules that
189
provide assurance to qualifying international shipping
corporations that they will not be considered resident in Canada
even if they are, in whole or in part, managed from Canada.
Further, the Canada Tax Act and many of the tax treaties to
which Canada is a party also contain special exemptions for
profits derived from international shipping operations.
We have entered into an agreement with Teekay Shipping Limited
for the provision of administrative services, and certain of our
operating subsidiaries have entered into agreements with:
|
|
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Limited for the provision of advisory,
technical, ship management and administrative services; and |
|
|
|
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd., a Canadian subsidiary of Teekay
Shipping Corporation, for the provision of strategic advisory
and consulting services. |
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Advisory and Administrative Services
Agreements.
Certain of the services that Teekay Shipping Limited provides to
us and our operating subsidiaries under the services agreements
are and will be obtained by Teekay Shipping Limited through
subcontracts with a Canadian subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation. The special rules in the Canada Tax Act and various
relevant tax treaties relating to qualifying international
shipping corporations and income from international shipping
operations may provide relief to our operating subsidiaries to
the extent that the services provided to them by Canadian
entities would otherwise result in such operating subsidiaries
being considered to be resident in Canada or to be taxable in
Canada on income from such operations by virtue of carrying on
business in Canada. However, such rules would not apply to us,
as a holding limited partnership, or to our general partner or
unitholders. While we do not believe it to be the case, if the
arrangements we propose to enter into result in our being
considered to carry on business in Canada for purposes of the
Canada Tax Act, our unitholders would be considered to be
carrying on business in Canada and would be required to file
Canadian tax returns and, subject to any relief provided in any
relevant treaty (including, in the case of U.S. Resident
Holders, the Canada-U.S. treaty), would be subject to
taxation in Canada on any income that is considered to be
attributable to the business carried on by us in Canada.
We believe that we can conduct our activities and affairs in a
manner so that our unitholders should not be considered to be
carrying on business in Canada solely as a consequence of the
acquisition, holding, disposition or redemption of our common
units. Consequently, we believe our unitholders should not be
subject to tax filing or other tax obligations in Canada under
the Canada Tax Act. However, although we do not intend to do so,
there can be no assurance that the manner in which we carry on
our activities will not change from time to time as
circumstances dictate or warrant in a manner that may cause our
unitholders to be carrying on business in Canada for purposes of
the Canada Tax Act. Further, the relevant Canadian federal
income tax law may change by legislation or judicial
interpretation and the Canadian taxing authorities may take a
different view than we have of the current law.
It is the responsibility of each unitholder to investigate the
legal and tax consequences, under the laws of pertinent
jurisdictions, including Canada, of an investment in us.
Accordingly, each prospective unitholder is urged to consult,
and depend upon, the unitholders tax counsel or other
advisor with regard to those matters. Further, it is the
responsibility of each unitholder to file all state, local and
non-U.S., as well as U.S. federal tax returns, that may be
required of the unitholder.
190
INVESTMENT IN TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. BY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
PLANS
An investment in us by an employee benefit plan is subject to
additional considerations because the investments of these plans
are subject to the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited
transaction provisions of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (or ERISA), and the prohibited
transaction provisions of Section 4975 of the Internal
Revenue Code. For these purposes, the term employee
benefit plan includes, but is not limited to, qualified
pension, profit-sharing and stock bonus plans, Keogh plans,
simplified employee pension plans and tax deferred annuities
established or maintained by an employer or employee
organization and individual retirement annuities and individual
retirement accounts (or IRAs) established by an
individual. Among other things, consideration should be given to:
|
|
|
|
|
whether the investment is prudent under
Section 404(a)(1)(B) of ERISA; |
|
|
|
whether in making the investment, the plan will satisfy the
diversification requirements of Section 404(a)(l)(C) of
ERISA; and |
|
|
|
whether the investment will result in recognition of unrelated
business taxable income by the plan and, if so, the potential
after-tax investment return. |
The person with investment discretion with respect to the assets
of an employee benefit plan is a fiduciary under applicable law
and should determine whether an investment in us is authorized
by the appropriate governing instrument and is a proper
investment for the plan.
Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Internal
Revenue Code prohibit employee benefit plans, and IRAs that are
not considered part of an employee benefit plan, from engaging
in specified transactions involving plan assets with
parties that are parties in interest under ERISA or
disqualified persons under the Internal Revenue Code
with respect to the plan.
In addition to considering whether the purchase of common units
is a prohibited transaction, a fiduciary of an employee benefit
plan should consider whether the plan will, by investing in us,
be deemed to own an undivided interest in our assets, with the
result that our general partner also would be a fiduciary of the
plan and our operations would be subject to the regulatory
restrictions of ERISA, including its prohibited transaction
rules, as well as the prohibited transaction rules of the
Internal Revenue Code.
The Department of Labor regulations provide guidance with
respect to whether the assets of an entity in which employee
benefit plans acquire equity interests would be deemed
plan assets under some circumstances. Under these
regulations, an entitys assets would not be considered to
be plan assets if, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the equity interests acquired by employee benefit plans are
publicly offered securities; i.e., the equity interests are
widely held by 100 or more investors independent of the issuer
and each other, are freely transferable and are registered under
specified provisions of the federal securities laws; |
|
|
|
the entity is an operating company (i.e., it is
primarily engaged in the production or sale of a product or
service other than the investment of capital either directly or
through a majority owned subsidiary or subsidiaries); or |
|
|
|
there is no significant investment by benefit plan investors,
which means that less than 25% of the value of each class of
equity interest (disregarding some interests held by our general
partner, its affiliates and any other persons who have the
ability to control our assets) or who provide investment advice
with respect to such assets, is held by the employee benefit
plans referred to above, IRAs, other employee benefit plans not
subject to ERISA, including governmental plans, and certain
entities whose underlying assets are deemed to be plan assets. |
Our assets should not be considered plan assets
under these regulations because it is expected that the
investment will satisfy the requirements in the first bullet
point above (i.e., we anticipate that the common units will
constitute publicly offered securities).
Plan fiduciaries contemplating a purchase of common units should
consult with their own counsel regarding the consequences under
ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code in light of the serious
penalties imposed on persons who engage in prohibited
transactions or other violations.
191
UNDERWRITING
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is acting as sole bookrunning
manager of this offering. Subject to the terms and conditions
stated in the underwriting agreement dated the date of this
prospectus, each underwriter named below has severally agreed to
purchase from us, and we have agreed to sell to it the number of
common units set forth opposite its name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
Underwriter |
|
Common Units | |
|
|
| |
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
DnB NOR Markets, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The business address of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is
388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013.
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
underwriters to purchase the common units included in this
offering are subject to approval of legal matters by counsel and
to other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to purchase
all the common units (other than those covered by the
over-allotment option described below) if they purchase any of
the common units.
The underwriters propose to offer some of the common units
directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on
the cover page of this prospectus and some of the common units
to dealers at the public offering price less a concession not to
exceed
$ per
common unit. The underwriters may allow, and dealers may
reallow, a concession not to exceed
$ per
common unit on sales to other dealers. If all of the common
units are not sold at the initial offering price, the
underwriters may change the public offering price and the other
selling terms.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for
30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to
600,000 additional common units at the public offering price
less the underwriting discount. The underwriters may exercise
the option solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments,
if any, in connection with this offering.
We, Teekay Shipping Corporation and the officers and directors
of our general partner and those of Teekay Shipping Corporation
have agreed that, for a period of 90 days from the date of
this prospectus, we and they will not, without the prior written
consent of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., dispose of or hedge
any common units or any securities convertible into or
exchangeable for our common units, except in limited
circumstances. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., in its sole
discretion, may release any of the securities subject to these
lock-up agreements at any time without notice. Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. has no present intent or arrangement to release any
of the securities subject to these lock-up agreements. The
release of any lock-up is considered on a case by case basis.
Factors in deciding whether to release common units may include
the length of time before the lock-up expires, the number of
units involved, the reason for the requested release, market
conditions, the trading price of our common units, historical
trading volumes of our common units and whether the person
seeking the release is an officer, director or affiliate of us.
192
The 90-day restricted period described in the preceding
paragraph will be extended if:
|
|
|
|
|
during the last 17 days of the 90-day restricted period we
issue an earnings release or announce material news or a
material event; or |
|
|
|
prior to the expiration of the 90-day restricted period, we
announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the 90-day restricted period; |
in which case the restrictions described in the preceding
paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release
or the announcement of the material news or material event.
Our common units are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol TGP.
The following table shows the underwriting discounts and
commissions that we are to pay to the underwriters in connection
with this offering. These amounts are shown assuming both no
exercise and full exercise of the underwriters option to
purchase additional common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid by Teekay LNG | |
|
|
Partners L.P. | |
|
|
| |
|
|
No Exercise | |
|
Full Exercise | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Per common unit
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
We estimate that our portion of the total expenses of this
offering, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, will
be approximately $0.7 million.
In connection with this offering, Citigroup Global Markets Inc.,
on behalf of the underwriters, may purchase and sell common
units in the open market. These transactions may include short
sales, syndicate covering transactions and stabilizing
transactions. Short sales involve syndicate sales of common
units in excess of the number of units to be purchased by the
underwriters in this offering, which creates a syndicate short
position. Covered short sales are sales of units
made in an amount up to the number of units represented by the
underwriters over-allotment option. In determining the
source of units to close out the covered syndicate short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of units available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase units through
the over-allotment option. Transactions to close out the covered
syndicate short involve either purchases of the common units in
the open market after the distribution has been completed or the
exercise of the over-allotment option. The underwriters also may
make naked short sales of units in excess of the
over-allotment option. The underwriters must close out any naked
short position by purchasing units of common units in the open
market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if
the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward
pressure on the price of the units in the open market after
pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in
this offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of bids for or
purchases of units in the open market while this offering is in
progress.
Any of these activities may have the effect of preventing or
retarding a decline in the market price of the common units.
They may also cause the price of the common units to be higher
than the price that would otherwise exist in the open market in
the absence of these transactions. The underwriters may conduct
these transactions on the New York Stock Exchange or in the
over-the-counter market, or otherwise. If the underwriters
commence any of these transactions, they may discontinue them at
any time.
The aggregate maximum compensation that members of the NASD or
independent broker-dealers will receive in connection with the
sale of any securities pursuant to this prospectus and the
registration statement of which it forms a part will not be
greater than 8% plus 1% for bona fide due diligence of the gross
proceeds of such sale.
The underwriters have performed investment banking and advisory
services for us and for Teekay Shipping Corporation from time to
time for which they have received customary fees and expenses.
193
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. acted as sole book-running manager
and as representative of the various underwriters in our initial
public offering in May 2005, for which it received customary
compensation. The underwriters may, from time to time, engage in
transactions with and perform services for us and our affiliates
in the ordinary course of their business.
The underwriters have advised us that they do not intend to
place a prospectus on the internet or otherwise engage in an
electronic distribution in connection with this offering, other
than as described below. It is possible that a prospectus in
electronic format may be made available on the websites
maintained by one or more of the underwriters. The underwriters
may agree to sell units to their online brokerage account
holders. The underwriters may make Internet distributions on the
same basis as other allocations. In addition, units may be sold
by the underwriters to securities dealers who resell units to
online brokerage account holders. Any online distributions will
be made in accordance with procedures for online distributions
previously cleared with the SEC. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
has also advised us that it may contract with Net Roadshow, Inc.
to conduct an internet roadshow in order to provide access to
the roadshow to institutional customers who cannot, or elect not
to, attend roadshow meetings in person.
Because the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
views the common units offered by this prospectus as interests
in a direct participation program, this offering is being made
in compliance with Rule 2810 of the NASDs Conduct
Rules.
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be
required to make because of any of those liabilities.
194
SERVICE OF PROCESS AND ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITIES
We are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands as a
limited partnership. Our general partner is organized under the
laws of the Marshall Islands as a limited liability company. The
Marshall Islands has a less developed body of securities laws as
compared to the United States and provides protections for
investors to a significantly lesser extent.
Most of the directors and officers of our general partner and
those of our subsidiaries are residents of countries other than
the United States. Substantially all of our and our
subsidiaries assets and a substantial portion of the
assets of the directors and officers of our general partner are
located outside the United States. As a result, it may be
difficult or impossible for United States investors to effect
service of process within the United States upon us, our general
partner, our subsidiaries or the directors and officers of our
general partner or to realize against us or them judgments
obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated
upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of
the United States or any state in the United States. However, we
have expressly submitted to the jurisdiction of the
U.S. federal and New York state courts sitting in the City
of New York for the purpose of any suit, action or proceeding
arising under the securities laws of the United States or any
state in the United States, and we have appointed Watson,
Farley & Williams (New York) LLP to accept service of
process on our behalf in any such action.
Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP, our counsel
as to Marshall Islands law, has advised us that there is
uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Marshall Islands
would (1) recognize or enforce against us, our general
partner or our general partners directors or officers
judgments of courts of the United States based on civil
liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state
securities laws or (2) impose liabilities against us, our
general partner or our general partners directors and
officers in original actions brought in the Marshall Islands,
based on these laws.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the common units and certain other legal matters
with respect to the laws of the Republic of The Marshall Islands
will be passed upon for us by our counsel as to Marshall Islands
law, Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP. Certain
other legal matters will be passed upon for us by Perkins Coie
LLP, Portland, Oregon, which may rely on the opinions of Watson,
Farley & Williams (New York) LLP for all matters of
Marshall Islands law. Certain matters with respect to this
offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Baker Botts
L.L.P., Houston, Texas and Seward & Kissel, LLP, New
York, New York.
EXPERTS
The following financial statements included in this prospectus
have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their reports
thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance
upon such reports given on the authority of such firm as experts
in auditing and accounting:
|
|
|
|
|
the balance sheets of Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. as at
December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the related financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003,
the four months ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months
ended December 31, 2004; |
|
|
|
the financial statements of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. as at and
for the nine months ended December 31, 2004; and |
|
|
|
the balance sheet of Teekay GP L.L.C. as at December 31,
2004. |
You may contact Ernst & Young LLP at address
700 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V7Y
1C7, Canada.
195
EXPENSES RELATED TO THIS OFFERING
The following table sets forth the main costs and expenses,
other than the underwriting discounts and commissions and
structuring fees, in connection with this offering, which we
will be required to pay.
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee
|
|
$ |
15,166 |
|
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. filing fee
|
|
|
13,385 |
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Printing costs
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Transfer agent fees and other
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
733,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
All amounts are estimated except the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission registration fee and the National
Association of Securities Dealers Inc. filing fee.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form F-1 regarding the common units. This prospectus does
not contain all of the information found in the registration
statement. For further information regarding us and the common
units offered in this prospectus, you may wish to review the
full registration statement, including its exhibits. The
registration statement, including the exhibits, may be inspected
and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the
SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Copies of this material can also be obtained upon written
request from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, at
prescribed rates or from the SECs web site on the Internet
at http://www.sec.gov free of charge. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on public reference
rooms. Our registration statement can also be inspected and
copied at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.,
20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
We are subject to the information requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and, in accordance therewith, we are
required to file with the SEC annual reports on Form 20-F
within six months of our fiscal year-end, and provide to the SEC
other material information on Form 6-K. We intend to file
our annual report on Form 20-F earlier than the SEC
currently requires. These reports and other information may be
inspected and copied at the public reference facilities
maintained by the SEC or obtained from the SECs website as
provided above. Our website on the Internet is located at
http://www.teekaylng.com, and we expect to make our periodic
reports and other information filed with or furnished to the SEC
available, free of charge, through our website, as soon as
reasonably practicable after those reports and other information
are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Information on our website or any other website is not
incorporated by reference into this prospectus and does not
constitute a part of this prospectus.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt under the Exchange
Act from, among other things, certain rules prescribing the
furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our executive
officers, directors and principal unitholders are exempt from
the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions
contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition,
we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic
reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or
as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are
registered under the Exchange Act, including the filing of
quarterly reports or current reports on Form 8-K. However,
we intend to furnish or make available to our unitholders annual
reports containing our audited consolidated financial statements
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and make available to
our unitholders quarterly reports containing our unaudited
interim financial information for the first three fiscal
quarters of each fiscal year. Our annual report will contain a
detailed statement of any transactions with our general partner
or its affiliates, and of fees, commissions, compensation and
other
196
benefits paid or accrued to our general partner or its
affiliates for the fiscal year completed, showing the amount
paid or accrued to each recipient and the services performed.
INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA
Clarkson Research Services Limited (or CRS), has provided
us statistical and graphical information contained in this
prospectus and relating to the LNG shipping and the oil tanker
industries. We do not have any knowledge that the information
provided by CRS is inaccurate in any material respect. CRS has
advised us that this information is drawn from its database and
other sources and that: (a) some information in CRSs
database is derived from estimates or subjective judgments;
(b) the information in the databases of other maritime data
collection agencies may differ from the information in
CRSs database; (c) while CRS has taken reasonable
care in the compilation of the statistical and graphical
information and believes it to be accurate and correct, data
compilation is subject to limited audit and validation
procedures, and may accordingly contain errors; (d) CRS,
its agents, officers and employees cannot accept liability for
any loss suffered in consequence of reliance on such information
or in any other manner; and (e) the provision of such
information does not obviate any need to make appropriate
inquiries.
197
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements included in this prospectus which are not historical
facts (including our financial forecast and any other statements
concerning plans and objectives of management for future
operations or economic performance, or assumptions related
thereto) are forward-looking statements. In addition, we and our
representatives may from time to time make other oral or written
statements which are also forward-looking statements. Such
statements include, in particular, statements about our plans,
strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our
business, and the markets in which we operate as described in
this prospectus. In some cases, you can identify the
forward-looking statements by the use of words such as
may, will, could,
should, would, expect,
plan, anticipate, intend,
forecast, believe, estimate,
predict, propose, potential,
continue or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements appear in a number of places and
include statements with respect to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to make cash distributions on the units or any
increases in our quarterly distributions; |
|
|
|
our future financial condition or results of operations and our
future revenues and expenses; |
|
|
|
the EBITDA and other contributions to our operating results of
the three Suezmax tankers and related time charters we will
acquire from Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of
this offering; |
|
|
|
our ability to enter into any new credit facility; |
|
|
|
future LNG and crude oil prices and production; |
|
|
|
planned capital expenditures and availability of capital
resources to fund capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
future supply of, and demand for, LNG and crude oil; |
|
|
|
increases in domestic oil and natural gas consumption; |
|
|
|
forecasts of likely future LNG exporters and importers and of
the accompanying expansion in the LNG global trade routes; |
|
|
|
forecasts of global LNG liquefaction and regasification capacity; |
|
|
|
our ability to maintain long-term relationships with major LNG
importers and exporters, and major crude oil companies; |
|
|
|
our ability to leverage to our advantage Teekay Shipping
Corporations relationships and reputation in the shipping
industry; |
|
|
|
our continued ability to enter into long-term, fixed-rate time
charters with our LNG customers; |
|
|
|
obtaining LNG projects that we or Teekay Shipping Corporation
bid on or that Teekay Shipping Corporation has been or may be
awarded; |
|
|
|
our ability to maximize the use of our vessels, including the
re-deployment or disposition of vessels no longer under
long-term time charter; |
|
|
|
expected purchases and deliveries of newbuilding vessels; |
|
|
|
expected financial flexibility to pursue acquisitions and other
expansion opportunities; |
|
|
|
our ability to compete successfully for future chartering and
newbuilding opportunities; |
|
|
|
the expected cost of, and our ability to comply with,
governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory
organization standards applicable to our business; |
198
|
|
|
|
|
our anticipated incremental general and administrative expenses
as a public company and our expenses under service agreements
with other affiliates of Teekay Shipping Corporation and for
reimbursements of fees and costs of our general partner; |
|
|
|
the anticipated taxation of our partnership and distributions to
our unitholders; |
|
|
|
estimated future maintenance capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
expected demand in the LNG and crude oil shipping sectors in
general and the demand for our vessels in particular; |
|
|
|
customers increasing emphasis on environmental and safety
concerns; |
|
|
|
continued outsourcing of non-core functions, such as seaborne
transportation, by companies in the oil and energy industry; |
|
|
|
entering into credit facilities or vessel financing
arrangements, including any U.K. lease arrangements for the
RasGas II vessels or otherwise, and the effects of any such
arrangements; and |
|
|
|
our business strategy and other plans and objectives for future
operations. |
These and other forward-looking statements are subject to the
risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those risks
discussed in Risk Factors and those risks discussed
in other reports we file with the SEC. The risks, uncertainties
and assumptions involve known and unknown risks and are
inherently subject to significant uncertainties and
contingencies, many of which are beyond our control.
Forward-looking statements are made based upon managements
current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs
concerning future events impacting us and therefore involve a
number of risks and uncertainties, including those risks
discussed in Risk Factors. We caution that
forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual
results could differ materially from those expressed or implied
in the forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after
the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time
to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these
factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such
factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or
combination of factors, may cause actual results to be
materially different from those contained in any forward-looking
statement.
199
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
F-11 |
|
|
|
|
F-12 |
|
|
|
|
F-13 |
|
|
|
|
F-14 |
|
|
|
|
F-15 |
|
|
|
|
F-16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30 |
|
|
|
|
F-31 |
|
|
|
|
F-32 |
|
|
|
|
F-33 |
|
|
|
|
F-34 |
|
|
|
|
F-35 |
|
|
|
|
F-36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48 |
|
|
|
|
F-49 |
|
|
|
|
F-50 |
|
|
|
|
F-51 |
|
|
|
|
F-52 |
|
|
|
|
F-53 |
|
|
|
|
F-54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-64 |
|
|
|
|
F-65 |
|
|
|
|
F-66 |
|
|
|
|
F-67 |
|
F-1
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
To facilitate an understanding of the organizational
relationships among the various entities for which financial
statements are included in this prospectus, the following
diagram depicts our organizational structure. Financial
statements are not included in this prospectus for all of the
following entities.
F-2
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
F-3
INTRODUCTION TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (or the Partnership) is a
Marshall Islands limited partnership recently formed by Teekay
Shipping Corporation as part of its strategy to expand its
operations in the liquefied natural gas (or LNG) shipping
sector. The Partnerships fleet was established by Naviera
F. Tapias S.A. (or Tapias), a Spanish company founded in
1991. Teekay Shipping Corporation acquired Tapias on
April 30, 2004 through its subsidiary Teekay Luxembourg
S.a.r.l. (or Luxco), and changed Tapiass name to
Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. (or Teekay Spain). Effective
with the closing of the Partnerships initial public
offering on May 10, 2005, Teekay Shipping Corporation
contributed all of the capital stock of Luxco to the
Partnership. The accompanying unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial information gives effect to this contribution, the
initial public offering and related transactions. As a
reorganization of entities under common control, the
contribution was recorded at Luxcos cost.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of loss for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and the unaudited pro forma
consolidated statement of income for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 assume the initial public offering and
related transactions occurred on January 1, 2004. Please
read Note 1, Basis of Presentation, in the accompanying
notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements for further explanation.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles consistent
with those used in, and should be read together with, the
following financial statements and related notes, which are
included elsewhere in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.s historical consolidated
financial statements and related notes for the six months ended
June 30, 2005; |
|
|
|
Teekay Spains historical audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes for the four months ended
April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended December 31,
2004; and |
|
|
|
Luxcos historical audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes as at and for the nine months ended
December 31, 2004. |
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements were
derived as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
for the year ended December 31, 2004, by adjusting
(1) the audited historical consolidated statement of income
of Teekay Spain for the period from January 1, 2004 to
April 30, 2004, and (2) the audited historical
consolidated statement of loss of Luxco for the period from
April 7, 2004 (the date of its incorporation) to
December 31, 2004, which includes the results of Teekay
Spain from May 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004; and |
|
|
|
for the six months ended June 30, 2005, by adjusting the
unaudited historical consolidated statement of income of Teekay
LNG Partners L.P for the six months ended June 30, 2005. |
The adjustments are based on currently available information and
certain estimates and assumptions; therefore, actual results may
differ from the pro forma adjustments. However, management
believes that the assumptions used provide a reasonable basis
for presenting the significant effects of the initial public
offering and the related transactions, and that the pro forma
adjustments give appropriate effect to the assumptions and are
applied in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States in the unaudited pro forma
consolidated financial statements.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements do not
purport to present the Partnerships results of operations
had the initial public offering and related transactions to be
effected in connection with that offering actually been
completed at the dates indicated. Moreover, they do not project
the Partnerships results of operations for any future
period.
F-4
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF LOSS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Initial Public | |
|
|
|
|
Teekay | |
|
Teekay | |
|
Offering and | |
|
|
|
|
Luxembourg | |
|
Shipping | |
|
Other | |
|
Teekay LNG | |
|
|
S.a.r.l. | |
|
Spain, S.L. | |
|
Transaction | |
|
Partners L.P. | |
|
|
Historical(1) | |
|
Historical(2) | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for unit data) | |
VOYAGE REVENUES
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,617 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
$ |
970 |
(3a) |
|
|
37,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,978 |
(3b) |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
(3c) |
|
|
8,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,309 |
(3h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
(3i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
54,055 |
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
5,283 |
|
|
|
82,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
29,060 |
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
(5,283 |
) |
|
|
41,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(50,485 |
) |
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
24,807 |
(3d) |
|
|
(31,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,065 |
(3e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,662 |
(3f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366 |
(3g) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
13,519 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,211 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
(78,831 |
) |
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
44,682 |
(3e) |
|
|
(16,139 |
) |
Interest rate swap gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
(4,890 |
)(3f) |
|
|
(905 |
) |
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
(8,016 |
)(3g) |
|
|
(17,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(661 |
)(3j) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items
|
|
|
(113,455 |
) |
|
|
(1,722 |
) |
|
|
72,015 |
|
|
|
(43,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(84,395 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
66,732 |
|
|
$ |
(1,499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners interest in net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
Limited partners interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,469 |
) |
Net loss per:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common unit (basic and diluted) (note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
Subordinated unit (basic and diluted) (note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
Total unit (basic and diluted) (note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
Weighted average number of units outstanding (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units outstanding (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,638 |
|
|
Subordinated units outstanding (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,735 |
|
|
Total units outstanding (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,373 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects consolidated results of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. from
April 7, 2004 (date of incorporation) to December 31,
2004, which include the results of Teekay Shipping Spain, S.L.
from May 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Reflects results of Teekay Shipping Spain, S.L. from
January 1, 2004 to April 30, 2004. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements.
F-5
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Initial Public | |
|
|
|
|
Teekay | |
|
Teekay LNG | |
|
Offering and | |
|
|
|
|
Luxembourg | |
|
Partners | |
|
Other | |
|
Teekay LNG | |
|
|
S.a.r.l. | |
|
L.P. | |
|
Transaction | |
|
Partners L.P. | |
|
|
Historical(1) | |
|
Historical(2) | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for unit data) | |
VOYAGE REVENUES
|
|
$ |
50,129 |
|
|
$ |
20,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
10,771 |
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,703 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,751 |
|
|
|
5,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,603 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
353 |
(3c) |
|
|
5,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463 |
(3h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
(3i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
28,701 |
|
|
|
11,131 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
40,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
21,428 |
|
|
|
9,233 |
|
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
29,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(35,679 |
) |
|
|
(8,196 |
) |
|
|
7,914 |
(3d) |
|
|
(26,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,323 |
(3e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598 |
(3f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
(3g) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
9,098 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,101 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
52,295 |
|
|
|
22,993 |
|
|
|
(28,460 |
)(3e) |
|
|
46,828 |
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
(17,927 |
) |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
7,820 |
(3f) |
|
|
(1,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,462 |
(3g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(889 |
)(3j) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items
|
|
|
7,787 |
|
|
|
19,470 |
|
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
|
30,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
29,215 |
|
|
$ |
28,703 |
|
|
$ |
2,205 |
|
|
$ |
60,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners interest in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,147 |
|
Limited partners interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,976 |
|
Net income per:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common unit (basic and diluted) (note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
Subordinated unit (basic and diluted) (note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
Total unit (basic and diluted) (note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
Weighted-average number of units outstanding (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,638 |
|
|
Subordinated units (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,735 |
|
|
Total units (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,373 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects consolidated results of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
(predecessor to Teekay LNG Partners L.P.) from January 1,
2005 to May 9, 2005. |
|
(2) |
Reflects consolidated results of Teekay LNG Partners L.P., which
include the results of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l., from
May 10, 2005 to June 30, 2005. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements.
F-6
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of loss for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and the unaudited pro forma
statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2005
assumes the following transactions occurred on January 1,
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase of Teekay Spain by Teekay Shipping Corporation
through Luxco. On April 30, 2004, Luxco purchased all the
outstanding shares of Tapias from an unrelated party for
$298.2 million in cash plus the assumption of debt and
remaining newbuilding commitments. |
|
|
|
The contribution by Teekay Shipping Corporation to Teekay LNG
Partners L.P. (or the Partnership) of (a) the shares
of, and an aggregate of $742.8 million in notes receivable
(including accrued interest) from, Luxco, and (b) the
shares of the subsidiary that owned the Suezmax tanker the
Granada Spirit, in exchange for: |
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance to Teekay Shipping Corporation of 8,734,572 common
units and 14,734,572 subordinated units of the Partnership; |
|
|
|
the issuance to Teekay GP L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, of the 2% general partner interest
in the Partnership and all of the Partnerships incentive
distribution rights; and |
|
|
|
an interest bearing loan of $10.0 million and a
non-interest bearing loan of $119.4 million to Teekay Spain
from Teekay Shipping Corporation. |
|
|
|
|
|
The issuance by the Partnership of 6,900,000 common units to the
public at an initial public offering price of $22.00 per
common unit, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds to the
Partnership of $151.8 million. |
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporations contribution to the
Partnership prior to the Partnerships initial public
offering of an amount that the Partnership used, together with
the loans and existing cash, to repay $337.3 million of
Teekay Spain term loans and to pay $143.3 million to settle
interest rate swaps associated with $337.3 million of debt
of Teekay Spain and to settle and re-enter into interest rate
swaps associated with 322.8 million Euros
($390.5 million) of term loans. |
|
|
|
The use of the net proceeds of the initial public offering to
repay the $10.0 million loan and $119.4 million loan
from Teekay Shipping Corporation. |
|
|
|
The payment by the Partnership in connection with its initial
public offering of underwriting commissions, structuring fees
and offering expenses of $15.9 million. |
The effect on the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements of certain of the previously mentioned transactions
is more fully described in Note 3.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are
not necessarily indicative of what the results of operations
would have been, nor do they purport to project the
Partnerships results of operations for any future periods
as a result of, among other things, the following items:
|
|
|
(a) The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of loss
for the year ended December 31, 2004 includes revenues and
expenses relating to marketable securities, real estate, a yacht
and other assets that were sold by Teekay Spain prior to its
acquisition by Teekay Shipping Corporation on April 30,
2004. The disposition of these assets resulted in other loss of
$11.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
|
(b) The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of loss
for the year ended December 31, 2004 also include revenues
and expenses associated with one Suezmax tanker (the Granada
Spirit) that was operating in the spot tanker market prior
to its transfer to Teekay Shipping Corporation in the fourth
quarter of 2004. Teekay Shipping Corporation contributed this
vessel back to us at the |
F-7
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
closing of the initial public offering and we sold it again to
Teekay Shipping Corporation on May 26, 2005. The revenue
earned by this vessel is not representative of the revenue we
earned from it during 2005, as the vessel was absent from our
fleet for part of the year and it was chartered to Teekay
Shipping Corporation from the Partnership at a fixed, daily time
charter rate. If this vessel had been earning the same fixed
charter rate in 2004, as during 2005, income from vessel
operations would have been lower by $6.1 million. |
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements of Teekay LNG Partners L.P., Teekay Spain and Luxco
referred to above.
|
|
2. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The accounting policies followed in preparing the unaudited pro
forma consolidated financial statements are those used by the
Partnership, Teekay Spain and Luxco as set forth in their
audited historical consolidated financial statements contained
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
3. |
Pro Forma Adjustments and Assumptions |
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements give
pro forma effect to the following:
|
|
|
(a) The purchase of Teekay Spain by Teekay Shipping
Corporation through its subsidiary Luxco as described above in
Note 1. Depreciation expense related to the acquired
vessels has been based upon their estimated fair market values
on the date of acquisition of April 30, 2004
($821.9 million), and a 25-year vessel life for Suezmax
tankers and a 35-year vessel life for LNG carriers. As a result
of the adjusted values of the acquired vessels, depreciation
expense increased by $1.0 million for the four months ended
April 30, 2004. |
|
|
(b) The purchase of Teekay Spain by Teekay Shipping
Corporation through its subsidiary Luxco. Amortization expense
related to the acquired time charter contracts has been based
upon their estimated fair market values on the date of
acquisition of April 30, 2004 ($183.1 million), and a
weighted-average amortization period of 19.2 years. As a
result, amortization expense increased by $2.0 million for
the four months ended April 30, 2004. |
|
|
(c) The incurrence by the Partnership of estimated
incremental general and administrative expenses of
$1.0 million annually, including costs associated with
annual reports to unitholders, tax return and Schedule K-1
preparation and distribution, investor relations, registrar and
transfer agents fees, incremental director and officer
liability insurance costs and directors compensation. The
Partnership has estimated this amount based on its experience
since its initial public offering, the experience of its
affiliate, Teekay Shipping Corporation, which is a public
company, and discussions with certain advisors. |
|
|
(d) The prepayment of $337.3 million of Teekay Spain
term loans with existing cash, and loans from, Teekay Shipping
Corporation, which are described in Note 1 above. These
term loans had a weighted-average interest rate of 7.9% per
annum. Had these term loans been repaid on January 1, 2004
rather than April 30, 2005, interest expense would have
decreased by $24.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and by $7.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005. Although the Partnership
entered into a $100 million credit facility in connection
with its initial public offering, it has not drawn on the
facility in connection with the transactions referred to in
Note 1 above. |
|
|
(e) The contribution by Teekay Shipping Corporation to the
Partnership of the Luxco shares and the aggregate amount of
$742.8 million of notes receivable from Luxco as described
above in |
F-8
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Note 1. If these Euro-denominated notes receivable from
Luxco had been contributed to the Partnership on January 1,
2004 rather than May 6, 2005, interest expense would have
decreased by $10.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and by $7.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005. In addition, foreign exchange
loss would have decreased by $44.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004, and foreign exchange gain would
have decreased by $28.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2005. |
|
|
(f) The payment of the settlement cost of
$143.3 million under interest rate swaps relating to the
$337.3 million debt repayment described above in
Note 3(d) and 322.8 million Euros
($390.5 million) of debt not repaid. If these interest rate
swaps had been repaid on January 1, 2004 rather than
April 30, 2005, the interest rate swap gain would have
decreased by $4.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and other loss would have decreased by
$7.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Had the interest rate swaps relating to the $390.5 million
of debt been settled and new swaps of the same amount been
entered into with a lower fixed interest rate both on
January 1, 2004, interest expense would have decreased by
$5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
by $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005. If these interest rate swaps had been settled on
January 1, 2004, we would have funded the settlement with
either a contribution from Teekay Shipping Corporation or a loan
from Teekay Shipping Corporation, which would have subsequently
been contributed to the Partnership. Consequently, the
Partnership would not have recorded interest expense from the
funding of these interest rate swap settlements with debt. |
|
|
(g) The write-downs of capitalized loan costs upon the
$337.3 million debt repayment described above in
Note 3(d) of $8.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the elimination of the actual
write-down of capitalized loan costs in April 2005. The amount
of the write-downs is the net book value of the capitalized loan
costs on the two term loans repaid. The corresponding decrease
in interest expense from these write-downs was $0.4 million
and $0.3 million, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the six months ended June 30,
2005. |
|
|
(h) After the closing of the transactions referred to in
Note 1 above, subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation
have agreed to provide certain services to the Partnership and
the Partnerships subsidiaries. These services include
strategic consulting, advisory, ship management, technical and
administrative services. The services are valued at a
reasonable, arms-length rate that includes reimbursement
of the reasonable direct or indirect expenses incurred in
providing the services. In addition, the Partnership reimburses
its general partner for expenses it incurs on behalf of the
Partnership. These costs are estimated to be approximately
$1.3 million annually. |
|
|
(i) Expenses associated with the 2005 Long-Term Incentive
Plan. Concurrent with the initial public offering, the
Partnership awarded 700 common units as compensation to each of
the Partnerships five non-employee directors. These common
units reverse vest equally over a three-year period. As a
result, compensation expense would have increased by
$0.03 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
by $0.01 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005. |
|
|
(j) The effect on provision for income taxes from the
incremental general and administrative expenses, prepayment of
debt, settlement of interest rate swaps and write-off of
capitalized loan costs described in Notes 3(d), (f), (g),
and (h). These effects on provision for income taxes are
determined by applying a 3.5% effective income tax rate to the
previously mentioned pro forma adjustments. |
F-9
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
4. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
Commitments and contingencies of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. are
set out in the unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004 contained elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
5. |
Net Income (Loss) per Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Subordinated | |
|
All Unit | |
|
|
Unit Holders | |
|
Unit Holders | |
|
Holders | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except number of units and per | |
|
|
unit data) | |
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Net Loss
|
|
$ |
(756 |
) |
|
$ |
(713 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,469 |
) |
|
Pro forma Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding
|
|
|
15,638,072 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
30,372,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Net Loss Per Unit
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Net Income
|
|
$ |
24,702 |
|
|
$ |
23,274 |
|
|
$ |
47,976 |
|
|
Pro forma Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding
|
|
|
15,638,072 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
30,372,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Net Income Per Unit
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pro forma weighted average number of units outstanding is
based upon the pro forma issuance of common units and
subordinated units by the Partnership on January 1, 2004.
Please see Note 1.
F-10
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
F-11
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, | |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
April 1 to | |
|
May 1 to | |
|
April 1 to | |
|
May 10 to | |
|
January 1 to | |
|
May 1 to | |
|
January 1 to | |
|
May 10 to | |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except unit and per unit data) | |
VOYAGE REVENUES
|
|
$ |
10,125 |
|
|
$ |
17,453 |
|
|
$ |
15,365 |
|
|
$ |
20,364 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
17,453 |
|
|
$ |
50,129 |
|
|
$ |
20,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
10,771 |
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
6,426 |
|
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
5,852 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
6,426 |
|
|
|
14,751 |
|
|
|
5,852 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
13,326 |
|
|
|
8,795 |
|
|
|
11,131 |
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
13,326 |
|
|
|
28,701 |
|
|
|
11,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
4,127 |
|
|
|
6,570 |
|
|
|
9,233 |
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
4,127 |
|
|
|
21,428 |
|
|
|
9,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (notes 8 and 9)
|
|
|
(5,369 |
) |
|
|
(11,070 |
) |
|
|
(10,068 |
) |
|
|
(8,196 |
) |
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
(11,070 |
) |
|
|
(35,679 |
) |
|
|
(8,196 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
3,491 |
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
3,491 |
|
|
|
9,098 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) (note 9)
|
|
|
11,007 |
|
|
|
(9,975 |
) |
|
|
7,296 |
|
|
|
22,993 |
|
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
(9,975 |
) |
|
|
52,295 |
|
|
|
22,993 |
|
Interest rate swaps gain
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss) net (note 10)
|
|
|
(11,611 |
) |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
(19,320 |
) |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
(17,927 |
) |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items
|
|
|
(2,804 |
) |
|
|
(16,950 |
) |
|
|
(19,263 |
) |
|
|
19,470 |
|
|
|
(1,722 |
) |
|
|
(16,950 |
) |
|
|
7,787 |
|
|
|
19,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,458 |
|
|
$ |
(12,823 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,693 |
) |
|
$ |
28,703 |
|
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(12,823 |
) |
|
$ |
29,215 |
|
|
$ |
28,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners interest in net income
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,233 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,233 |
|
Limited partners interest: (note 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
(12,823 |
) |
|
|
(12,693 |
) |
|
|
19,470 |
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
(12,823 |
) |
|
|
29,215 |
|
|
|
19,470 |
|
|
Net income (loss) per:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Common unit (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
|
(0.54 |
) |
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
- Subordinated unit (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
|
(0.54 |
) |
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
- Total unit (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
|
(0.54 |
) |
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
Weighted-average number of units outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Common units (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
8,734,572 |
|
|
|
8,734,572 |
|
|
|
8,734,572 |
|
|
|
15,638,072 |
|
|
|
8,734,572 |
|
|
|
8,734,572 |
|
|
|
8,734,572 |
|
|
|
15,638,072 |
|
|
- Subordinated units (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
- Total units (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
23,469,144 |
|
|
|
23,469,144 |
|
|
|
23,469,144 |
|
|
|
30,372,644 |
|
|
|
23,469,144 |
|
|
|
23,469,144 |
|
|
|
23,469,144 |
|
|
|
30,372,644 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements.
F-12
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
As at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | |
ASSETS |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
156,410 |
|
|
$ |
55,875 |
|
Restricted cash current (note 5)
|
|
|
82,387 |
|
|
|
83,240 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,197 |
|
|
|
3,576 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
249,443 |
|
|
|
145,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long-term (note 5)
|
|
|
352,725 |
|
|
|
303,800 |
|
Vessels and equipment (note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $10,947
(December 31, 2004 $5,829)
|
|
|
366,334 |
|
|
|
361,216 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation of $20,237 (December 31, 2004
$9,597) (note 5)
|
|
|
629,569 |
|
|
|
619,083 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (note 14)
|
|
|
49,165 |
|
|
|
172,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment
|
|
|
1,045,068 |
|
|
|
1,152,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20,394 |
|
|
|
11,061 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 6)
|
|
|
178,457 |
|
|
|
173,792 |
|
Goodwill (note 6)
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,826,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY/ STOCKHOLDER DEFICIT |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
11,411 |
|
|
$ |
2,590 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
8,240 |
|
|
|
19,073 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 9)
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
|
|
22,449 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases (note 5)
|
|
|
87,687 |
|
|
|
80,679 |
|
Advances from affiliate (note 8)
|
|
|
465,695 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
595,401 |
|
|
|
125,311 |
|
Long-term debt (note 9)
|
|
|
764,758 |
|
|
|
381,186 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases (note 5)
|
|
|
513,361 |
|
|
|
481,240 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
|
|
14,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,008,368 |
|
|
|
1,002,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (notes 12 and 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest (note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,554 |
|
Partners equity/ Stockholder deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
745,361 |
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(79,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (note 11)
|
|
|
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
(62,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners equity/stockholder deficit
|
|
|
(123,002 |
) |
|
|
682,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners equity/stockholder
deficit
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,826,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements.
F-13
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of | |
|
|
U.S. Dollars) | |
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
3,341 |
|
|
$ |
57,918 |
|
Non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,011 |
|
|
|
20,603 |
|
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of other assets
|
|
|
11,922 |
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(1,745 |
) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
Foreign currency exchange gain
|
|
|
(6,718 |
) |
|
|
(79,014 |
) |
|
Interest rate swaps gain
|
|
|
(3,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from settlement of interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,820 |
|
|
Write-off of capitalized loan costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,462 |
|
|
Accrued interest and other net
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
7,464 |
|
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating
activities
|
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow
|
|
|
19,526 |
|
|
|
25,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
7,144 |
|
|
|
10,900 |
|
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(12,236 |
) |
|
|
(5,600 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(2,578 |
) |
|
|
(3,346 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(20,575 |
) |
|
|
(339,438 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,327 |
|
Interest rate swap settlement costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143,295 |
) |
Advances from affiliate
|
|
|
306,048 |
|
|
|
353,069 |
|
Advances to affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184,302 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,440 |
|
Other
|
|
|
4,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow
|
|
|
282,029 |
|
|
|
(160,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(10,487 |
) |
|
|
(48,921 |
) |
Purchase of Teekay Shipping Spain, S.L.
|
|
|
(297,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,606 |
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of other assets
|
|
|
6,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow
|
|
|
(301,367 |
) |
|
|
34,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(100,535 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
|
|
|
21,328 |
|
|
|
156,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
|
|
$ |
21,516 |
|
|
$ |
55,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements.
F-14
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS
EQUITY/STOCKHOLDER DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERS EQUITY | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Stockholder | |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Partners | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit | |
|
|
|
|
|
General | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor) | |
|
Common Units | |
|
Subordinated Units | |
|
Partner | |
|
Loss | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars and units) | |
Balance as at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
(123,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(123,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (January 1 to May 9, 2005)
|
|
|
29,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,215 |
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments (note 13)
|
|
|
(22,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,874 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative instruments
included in net income (note 13)
|
|
|
14,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,359 |
|
Sale of the Santiago Spirit (note 12)
|
|
|
(3,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at May 9, 2005
|
|
|
(105,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contribution by Teekay Shipping Corporation
(note 1)
|
|
|
105,417 |
|
|
|
8,734 |
|
|
|
211,788 |
|
|
|
14,735 |
|
|
|
357,318 |
|
|
|
11,614 |
|
|
|
(52,194 |
) |
|
|
633,943 |
|
Proceeds from initial public offering of limited partnership
interests, net of offering costs of $15,863 (note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
135,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,937 |
|
Issuance of units to non-employee directors (note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (May 10 to June 30, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,445 |
|
|
|
9,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,703 |
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,916 |
) |
|
|
(11,916 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative instruments
included in net income (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at June 30, 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
15,638 |
|
|
$ |
357,751 |
|
|
|
14,735 |
|
|
$ |
366,763 |
|
|
$ |
20,847 |
|
|
$ |
(62,509 |
) |
|
$ |
682,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements.
F-15
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
On April 30, 2004, Teekay Shipping Corporation through its
subsidiary, Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (or Luxco),
acquired all of the outstanding shares of Naviera F. Tapias S.A.
and its subsidiaries (or Tapias) and renamed it Teekay
Shipping Spain S.L. (or Teekay Spain). Teekay Shipping
Corporation acquired Teekay Spain for $298.2 million in
cash, plus the assumption of debt and remaining newbuilding
commitments.
On November 3, 2004, Teekay Shipping Corporation formed
Teekay LNG Partners L.P., a Marshall Islands limited partnership
(or the Partnership), to own and operate the liquefied
natural gas (or LNG) and Suezmax crude oil marine
transportation businesses conducted by Luxco and its
subsidiaries (collectively, the Predecessor). On
May 6, 2005, Teekay Shipping Corporation contributed to the
Partnership all of the outstanding shares of Luxco, all but
$54.9 million of the notes receivable from Luxco, and all
of the equity interests of Granada Spirit L.L.C. (which owns the
Suezmax tanker, the Granada Spirit), in connection with
the Partnerships initial public offering of common units,
which represent limited partner interests in the Partnership.
The Partnership subsequently repaid the $54.9 million note
receivable.
In exchange for the equity interests and assets, Teekay Shipping
Corporation received 8,734,572 common units and 14,734,572
subordinated units from the Partnership. The Partnerships
general partner, Teekay GP L.L.C. (or the General
Partner) received a 2% general partner interest and all of
the incentive distribution rights in the Partnership. Teekay GP
L.L.C. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements include the accounts of Teekay Spain and its
subsidiaries for periods prior to April 30, 2004. The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Luxco
and its subsidiaries, which includes Teekay Spain, for periods
subsequent to April 30, 2004 and prior to May 10,
2005. The results for the periods subsequent to April 30,
2004 reflect the comprehensive revaluation of all assets
(including intangible assets and goodwill) and liabilities of
Teekay Spain at their fair values on the date of acquisition.
For periods subsequent to May 10, 2005, the accompanying
unaudited consolidated interim financial statements include the
accounts of Teekay LNG Partners L.P., its subsidiaries (which
include, among others, Luxco and Teekay Spain), and Teekay
Nakilat Holdings Corporation, a variable interest entity for
which the Partnership is the primary beneficiary. Please see
Note 14(b). The transfer to the Partnership of the shares
of and notes receivable from Luxco and equity interests of
Granada Spirit L.L.C. represented a reorganization of entities
under common control and, consequently, was recorded at
historical cost. The book value of these assets on their
transfer was $633.9 million.
Prior to the acquisition of Teekay Spain by Teekay Shipping
Corporation on April 30, 2004, Teekay Spain disposed of
three businesses previously held in subsidiaries and unrelated
to the marine transportation operations purchased by Teekay
Shipping Corporation. The accompanying unaudited consolidated
interim financial statements do not include the results of these
three unrelated businesses. Proceeds received by Teekay Spain
from the sale of these businesses have been accounted for as an
equity contribution. In addition, immediately preceding the
closing of the acquisition, Teekay Spain sold to its then
controlling stockholder marketable securities, real estate, a
yacht and other assets. The accompanying unaudited consolidated
interim financial statements include results related to these
assets.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. Certain
information and footnote disclosures required by generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States for complete
F-16
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
annual financial statements have been omitted and, therefore,
these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements of Luxco for the nine
months ended December 31, 2004 and Teekay Spain for the
year ended December 31, 2004 included elsewhere in this
prospectus. In the opinion of the General Partners
management, these interim statements reflect all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary to
present fairly, in all material respects, the Partnerships
consolidated financial position, results of operations, changes
in partners equity/stockholder deficit and cash flows for
the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the
interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of
those for a full fiscal year. Significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated.
|
|
2. |
Initial Public Offering |
On May 10, 2005, the Partnership completed its initial
public offering of 6,900,000 common units at a price of
$22.00 per unit. This included 900,000 common units sold to
the underwriters in connection with the exercise of their
over-allotment option. The proceeds received by the Partnership
from the initial public offering and the use of those proceeds
are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of 6,900,000 common units at $22.00 per unit
|
|
$ |
151,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Use of proceeds from sale of common units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting and structuring fees
|
|
$ |
10,473 |
|
|
Professional fees and other offering expenses to third parties
|
|
|
5,390 |
|
|
Repayment of advances from Teekay Shipping Corporation
|
|
|
129,400 |
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
6,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
151,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Concurrently with the Offering, the Partnership awarded 700
common units as compensation to each of the Partnerships
five non-employee directors. These common units reverse vest
equally over a three-year period.
|
|
3. |
Acquisition of Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. |
On April 30, 2004, the Predecessor acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Tapias and renamed it Teekay Shipping
Spain S.L. The Predecessor acquired Teekay Spain for
$298.2 million in cash, plus the assumption of debt and
remaining newbuilding commitments. Management of the General
Partner believes the acquisition of Teekay Spains business
has provided the Partnership with a strategic platform from
which to expand its presence in the LNG shipping sector and
immediate access to reputable LNG operations. The Partnership
believes this will benefit it in acquiring future LNG projects.
These benefits contributed to the recognition of goodwill.
Teekay Spains results of operations have been consolidated
with the Partnerships results commencing May 1, 2004.
As at June 30, 2005, the Partnerships LNG fleet
consisted of seven vessels, including three vessels then under
construction. Teekay Shipping Corporation has agreed to sell to
the Partnership all of its interest in the entity that owns
these three LNG newbuilding carriers upon delivery of the first
vessel, which is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2006
(please see Note 14(b)). All seven vessels are contracted
under long-term, fixed-rate time charters to international
energy companies. As at June 30, 2005, the
Partnerships conventional crude oil tanker fleet consisted
of five Suezmax tankers, including one
F-17
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
newbuilding that delivered in July 2005. All five Suezmax
tankers are contracted under long-term, fixed-rate time charters
with a major Spanish oil company.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed by the Partnership at
April 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
|
April 30, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
ASSETS |
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term restricted cash
|
|
$ |
85,092 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
7,415 |
|
Vessels and equipment
|
|
|
821,939 |
|
Restricted cash long-term
|
|
|
311,664 |
|
Other assets long-term
|
|
|
15,355 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-charter contracts (weighted-average useful life of
19.2 years)
|
|
|
183,052 |
|
Goodwill ($3.6 million Suezmax tanker segment and
$35.7 million LNG carrier segment)
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
$ |
1,463,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
98,428 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
668,733 |
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
311,011 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
87,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
1,165,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired (cash consideration)
|
|
$ |
298,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership has two reportable segments: its Suezmax tanker
segment and its LNG carrier segment. The Partnerships
Suezmax tanker segment consists of conventional crude oil
tankers operating on fixed-rate time-charter contracts. Prior to
December 2004, it also included one Suezmax tanker (the
Granada Spirit) operating on the spot market. The
Partnerships LNG carrier segment consists of LNG carriers
subject to fixed-rate time charters. Segment results are
evaluated based on income from vessel operations. The accounting
policies applied to the reportable segments are the same as
those used in the preparation of the Partnerships
consolidated financial statements.
F-18
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
The following tables include results for these segments for the
interim periods presented in these financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
April 1 to April 30, 2004 | |
|
May 1 to June 30, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
6,122 |
|
|
$ |
4,003 |
|
|
$ |
10,125 |
|
|
$ |
9,454 |
|
|
$ |
7,999 |
|
|
$ |
17,453 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
3,679 |
|
|
|
2,747 |
|
|
|
6,426 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
1,815 |
|
|
$ |
2,447 |
|
|
$ |
4,262 |
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
|
$ |
3,284 |
|
|
$ |
4,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
4,651 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
4,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
April 1 to May 9, 2005 | |
|
May 10 to June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
4,746 |
|
|
$ |
10,619 |
|
|
$ |
15,365 |
|
|
$ |
6,204 |
|
|
$ |
14,160 |
|
|
$ |
20,364 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
3,224 |
|
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
|
|
5,852 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
1,511 |
|
|
$ |
5,059 |
|
|
$ |
6,570 |
|
|
$ |
2,149 |
|
|
$ |
7,084 |
|
|
$ |
9,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 1 to April 30, 2004 | |
|
May 1 to June 30, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
24,708 |
|
|
$ |
16,010 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
9,454 |
|
|
$ |
7,999 |
|
|
$ |
17,453 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
7,196 |
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
3,679 |
|
|
|
2,747 |
|
|
|
6,426 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
8,079 |
|
|
$ |
9,807 |
|
|
$ |
17,886 |
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
|
$ |
3,284 |
|
|
$ |
4,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
$ |
5,039 |
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
$ |
5,522 |
|
|
$ |
4,651 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
4,965 |
|
F-19
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 1 to May 9, 2005 | |
|
May 10 to June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
15,246 |
|
|
$ |
34,883 |
|
|
$ |
50,129 |
|
|
$ |
6,204 |
|
|
$ |
14,160 |
|
|
$ |
20,364 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
5,971 |
|
|
|
10,771 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
10,746 |
|
|
|
14,751 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
|
|
5,852 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
16,653 |
|
|
$ |
21,428 |
|
|
$ |
2,149 |
|
|
$ |
7,084 |
|
|
$ |
9,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
$ |
43,962 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
43,962 |
|
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
Reconciliations of total segment assets to total assets
presented in the unaudited consolidated interim balance sheets
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
As at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total assets of the Suezmax tanker segment
|
|
$ |
287,058 |
|
|
$ |
264,563 |
|
Total assets of the LNG carrier segment
|
|
|
1,423,191 |
|
|
|
1,492,903 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
|
156,410 |
|
|
|
55,875 |
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
|
|
18,707 |
|
|
|
12,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,826,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash |
Suezmax Tankers. As at June 30, 2005, the
Partnership was a party to capital leases on four Suezmax
tankers. Under the terms of the lease arrangements, which
include the Partnerships contractual right to full
operation of the vessels pursuant to bareboat charters, the
Partnership is required to purchase these vessels at the end of
their respective lease terms for a fixed price. As at
June 30, 2005, the weighted-average interest rate implicit
in these capital leases was 7.7%. As at June 30, 2005, the
remaining commitments under these capital leases, including the
purchase obligations, approximated $210.6 million,
including imputed interest of $26.3 million, payable as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
10.4 million |
|
2006
|
|
|
145.8 million |
|
2007
|
|
|
3.9 million |
|
2008
|
|
|
3.9 million |
|
2009
|
|
|
3.8 million |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
42.8 million |
|
F-20
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
LNG Carriers. As at June 30, 2005, the
Partnership was a party to capital leases on two LNG carriers,
which are structured as Spanish tax leases. Under
the terms of the Spanish tax leases, the Partnership will
purchase these vessels at the end of their respective lease
terms in 2006 and 2011, both of which purchase obligations have
been fully funded with restricted cash deposits described below.
As at June 30, 2005, the weighted-average interest rate
implicit in the Spanish tax leases was 5.7%. As at June 30,
2005, the commitments under these capital leases, including the
purchase obligations, approximated 365.3 million Euros
($441.9 million), including imputed interest of
53.2 million Euros ($64.3 million), payable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
77.1 million Euros ($93.3 million |
) |
2006
|
|
|
123.2 million Euros ($149.0 million |
) |
2007
|
|
|
23.3 million Euros ($28.1 million |
) |
2008
|
|
|
24.4 million Euros ($29.5 million |
) |
2009
|
|
|
25.6 million Euros ($31.0 million |
) |
Thereafter
|
|
|
91.7 million Euros ($111.0 million |
) |
During 2003, these two LNG carriers were sold for aggregate
proceeds of $399.2 million and leased back on terms
described above. The sale of these vessels resulted in a gain of
$70.5 million, which has been deferred and is being
amortized over the remaining estimated useful life of the
vessels.
Under the terms of the Spanish tax leases for the two LNG
carriers, the Partnership is required to have on deposit with
financial institutions an amount of cash that, together with
interest earned on the deposit, will equal the remaining amounts
owing under the leases, including the obligations to purchase
the LNG carriers at the end of the lease periods. This amount
was 309.5 million Euros ($421.6 million) and
317.8 million Euros ($384.4 million) as at
December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2005, respectively.
These cash deposits are restricted to being used for capital
lease payments and have been fully funded with term loans
(please see Note 9) and a Spanish government grant. The
interest rates earned on the deposits approximate the interest
rates implicit in the Spanish tax leases. As at
December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2005, the
weighted-average interest rate earned on the deposits was 5.3%.
The Partnership also maintains restricted cash deposits relating
to certain term loans, which cash totaled $13.5 million and
$2.6 million as at December 31, 2004 and June 30,
2005, respectively.
|
|
6. |
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
As at June 30, 2005, intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
Amortization | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Period | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(years) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-charter contracts
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
182,522 |
|
|
$ |
8,760 |
|
|
$ |
173,792 |
|
F-21
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
All intangible assets were recognized on April 30, 2004
(please see Note 3). Amortization expense of intangible
assets for the interim periods presented is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, | |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
|
| |
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
April 1 |
|
May 1 | |
|
April 1 | |
|
May 10 | |
|
January 1 |
|
May 1 | |
|
January 1 | |
|
May 10 | |
to |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
April 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2004 | |
|
May 9, 2005 | |
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
April 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2004 | |
|
May 9, 2005 | |
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,763 |
|
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,763 |
|
|
$ |
3,369 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
The Partnerships intangible assets are being amortized on
a straight-line basis over the term of the time-charter
contracts.
The carrying amount of goodwill as at December 31, 2004 and
June 30, 2005 for the Partnerships reporting segments
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as at December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2005
(note 3)
|
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
|
$ |
35,631 |
|
|
$ |
39,279 |
|
Cash interest paid by the Partnership during the six months
ended June 30, 2004 and 2005 totaled $21.1 million and
$41.1 million, respectively.
Income taxes paid by the Partnership during the six months ended
June 30, 2004 and 2005 totaled $1.1 million and
$3.2 million, respectively.
|
|
8. |
Advances from Affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Euro-denominated Demand Promissory Notes
|
|
$ |
371,073 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Euro-denominated Participating Loan
|
|
|
94,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (non-interest bearing)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
465,695 |
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the period from January 1, 2004 to May 10,
2005, Teekay Shipping Corporation made loans, net of repayments,
to a subsidiary of the Partnership totaling 574.7 million
Euros ($740.2 million) for the purchase of Teekay Spain
(please see Note 3), for the repayment of terms loans
associated with two of the Partnerships LNG carriers
(please see Note 9) and to settle interest rate swaps
(please see Note 13). These loans, including
2.0 million Euros ($2.6 million) of unpaid accrued
interest, were contributed by Teekay Shipping Corporation to the
Partnership in connection with its initial public offering.
Interest payments on these Euro-denominated loans were based on
the 12-month EURIBOR (December 31, 2004 2.4%
and June 30, 2005 2.1%) plus a margin, with the
exception of one loan of 67.1 million Euros
($86.5 million), which was based on a fixed rate of 5.4%.
At December 31, 2004 and
F-22
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
at June 30, 2005, these margins ranged between 1.7% and
2.5%. The interest expense incurred on these loans for the
interim periods presented is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
April 1 |
|
May 1 | |
|
April 1 | |
|
May 10 |
|
January 1 |
|
May 1 | |
|
January 1 | |
|
May 10 |
to |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to |
|
to |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to |
April 30, |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, |
|
April 30, |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, |
2004 |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
$ |
2,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2005
|
|
$ |
343,390 |
|
|
$ |
14,462 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2023
|
|
|
443,736 |
|
|
|
389,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787,126 |
|
|
|
403,635 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
|
|
22,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
764,758 |
|
|
$ |
381,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership has several term loans outstanding, which, as at
June 30, 2005, totaled $14.5 million of
U.S. Dollar-denominated loans and 321.7 million Euros
($389.2 million) of Euro-denominated loans. The
Euro-denominated loans were used to make restricted cash
deposits that fully fund payments under capital leases (please
see Note 5). Prior to the Partnerships initial public
offering, the Partnership repaid $337.3 million of term
loans associated with two LNG carriers.
In connection with the initial public offering, one of the
Partnerships LNG carrier-owning subsidiaries amended its
term loan agreement to provide for a $100 million senior
secured revolving credit facility (or the Revolver). As
at June 30, 2005, this facility was undrawn. The Revolver
may be used by the Partnership for general partnership purposes
and to fund cash distributions. Under the Revolver, the
Partnership is required to reduce all borrowings used to fund
cash distributions to zero for a period of at least 15
consecutive days during any 12-month period. The Revolver is
available to the Partnership until September 2009.
All Euro-denominated term loans and Euro-denominated advances
from affiliates (please see Note 8) are revalued at the end
of each period using the then prevailing Euro/ U.S. Dollar
exchange rate. Due substantially to this revaluation, the
Partnership recognized foreign exchange gains (losses) during
the interim periods presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, | |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
|
| |
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
April 1 | |
|
May 1 | |
|
April 1 | |
|
May 10 | |
|
January 1 | |
|
May 1 | |
|
January 1 | |
|
May 10 | |
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ |
11,007 |
|
|
$ |
(9,975 |
) |
|
$ |
7,296 |
|
|
$ |
22,993 |
|
|
$ |
18,010 |
|
|
$ |
(9,975 |
) |
|
$ |
52,295 |
|
|
$ |
22,993 |
|
Interest payments on the U.S. Dollar-denominated term loans
and the Revolver are based on LIBOR plus a margin. Interest
payments on the Euro-denominated term loans are based on EURIBOR
plus a margin. At December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2005,
these margins ranged between 0.5% and 1.3%.
F-23
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
The weighted-average effective interest rate for debt
outstanding at June 30, 2005 was 3.6%
(U.S. Dollar-denominated debt) and 3.3% (Euro-denominated
debt). These rates do not reflect the effect of related interest
rate swaps that the Partnership has used to hedge certain of its
floating-rate debt (please see Note 13).
The term loans reduce in monthly payments with varying
maturities through 2023. All term loans of the Partnership are
collateralized by first-preferred mortgages on the vessels to
which the loans relate, together with certain other collateral
and guarantees from Teekay Spain.
The Partnerships obligations under the Revolver are
secured by a first-priority mortgage on one of its LNG carriers,
the Hispania Spirit, and a pledge of certain shares of
the subsidiary operating the carrier.
The aggregate long-term debt principal repayments required for
periods subsequent to June 30, 2005 are $18.4 million
(2005), $8.3 million (2006), $8.9 million (2007),
$9.5 million (2008), $10.2 million (2009) and
$348.4 million (thereafter).
All of the Partnerships vessel financing is arranged on a
vessel-by-vessel basis, and each financing is secured by the
applicable vessel. The Partnerships capital leases do not
contain financial or restrictive covenants other than those
relating to operation and maintenance of the vessels. The
Partnerships term loans relating to its LNG carriers
contain covenants that require the maintenance of restricted
cash deposits, unencumbered liquidity and minimum tangible net
worth. In addition, the Partnerships shipowning
subsidiaries may not, in addition to other things, pay dividends
or distributions if the Partnership is in default under the term
loans.
The Partnerships term loan for one of its LNG carriers,
the Catalunya Spirit, contains covenants that require the
maintenance of a minimum liquidity of 5.0 million Euros and
annual restricted cash deposits of 1.2 million Euros.
|
|
10. |
Other Income (Loss) Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, | |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
April 1 | |
|
May 1 | |
|
April 1 | |
|
May 10 | |
|
January 1 | |
|
May 1 | |
|
January 1 | |
|
May 10 | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Loss on cancellation of interest rate swaps
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,820 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,820 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
(11,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
(11,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
Write-off of capitalized loan costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax recovery (expense)
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
(4,004 |
) |
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
(2,648 |
) |
|
|
1,672 |
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss) net
|
|
$ |
(11,611 |
) |
|
$ |
604 |
|
|
$ |
(19,320 |
) |
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
$ |
(10,934 |
) |
|
$ |
604 |
|
|
$ |
(17,927 |
) |
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
11. |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, | |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
April 1 | |
|
May 1 | |
|
April 1 | |
|
May 10 | |
|
January 1 | |
|
May 1 | |
|
January 1 | |
|
May 10 | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,458 |
|
|
$ |
(12,823 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,693 |
) |
|
$ |
28,703 |
|
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(12,823 |
) |
|
$ |
29,215 |
|
|
$ |
28,703 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,420 |
) |
|
|
(24,882 |
) |
|
|
(11,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,420 |
) |
|
|
(22,874 |
) |
|
|
(11,916 |
) |
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative instruments
included in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,428 |
|
|
|
9,246 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,428 |
|
|
|
14,359 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gain on available-for-sale
securities included in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,458 |
|
|
$ |
(17,815 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,329 |
) |
|
$ |
18,388 |
|
|
$ |
16,576 |
|
|
$ |
(17,815 |
) |
|
$ |
20,700 |
|
|
$ |
18,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
Related Party Transactions |
(a) On May 6, 2005, Teekay Shipping Corporation
contributed all of the outstanding shares of Luxco, all but
$54.9 million of the notes receivable from Luxco, and all
of the outstanding equity interests of Granada Spirit L.L.C.
(which owns the Suezmax tanker, the Granada Spirit) to
the Partnership in connection with the Partnerships
initial public offering on May 10, 2005 of common units,
which represent limited partner interests in the Partnership.
The Partnership subsequently repaid the $54.9 million note
receivable.
(b) The Partnership has entered into an omnibus agreement
with Teekay Shipping Corporation, the General Partner and others
governing, among other things, when the Partnership and Teekay
Shipping Corporation may compete with each other and certain
rights of first offer on LNG carriers and Suezmax tankers.
(c) The Partnership and certain of its operating
subsidiaries have entered into services agreements with certain
subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation pursuant to which
the Teekay Shipping Corporation subsidiaries will provide the
Partnership with administrative, advisory, technical and
strategic consulting services for a reasonable, arms-length fee.
During the period from May 10, 2005 to June 30, 2005,
the Partnership incurred $0.2 million of these costs.
(d) The Partnership reimburses the General Partner for all
expenses necessary or appropriate for the conduct of the
Partnerships business. During the period from May 10,
2005 to June 30, 2005, the Partnership incurred
$0.1 million of these costs.
(e) The Partnership has entered into an agreement with
Teekay Shipping Corporation to purchase all of its interest
(which will not be less than 70%) in Teekay Nakilat Corporation
(or Teekay Nakilat),
F-25
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
which in turn indirectly owns three LNG newbuildings and the
related 20-year, fixed-rate time charters. The purchase will
occur upon the delivery of the first newbuilding, which is
scheduled during the fourth quarter of 2006. The estimated
purchase price of a 100% ownership interest in Teekay Nakilat is
approximately $124.5 million, plus the assumption of
approximately $468.0 million of long-term debt. Should
Teekay Shipping Corporations ownership interest be less
than 100%, our purchase commitment will reduce pro-rata. This
purchase agreement has resulted in the consolidation of Teekay
Nakilat as a variable interest entity (please see
Note 14(b)).
(f) Following Teekay Shipping Corporations
contribution of the Granada Spirit LLC to the Partnership on the
closing of the Partnerships initial public offering, the
Partnership entered into a short-term, fixed-rate time charter
and vessel sales agreement with a subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation for the Granada Spirit. On May 26, 2005,
the Partnership sold the Granada Spirit to a subsidiary
of Teekay Shipping Corporation for $20.6 million, resulting
in a gain on sale of $0.2 million. Net voyage revenues
earned under the time-charter agreement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation were $0.5 million.
(g) In early 2005, the Partnership completed the sale of
the Santiago Spirit (a newly constructed Suezmax tanker
delivered in March 2005) to a subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation for $70.0 million. The resulting
$3.1 million loss on sale, net of income taxes, has been
accounted for as an equity distribution.
|
|
13. |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
The Partnership uses derivatives only for hedging purposes.
As at June 30, 2005, the Partnership was committed to the
following interest rate swap agreements related to its
EURIBOR-based debt, whereby certain of the Partnerships
floating-rate debt was swapped with fixed-rate obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value/ | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Average | |
|
Fixed | |
|
|
Interest Rate | |
|
Principal | |
|
Amount of | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
Index | |
|
Amount | |
|
Liability | |
|
Term | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(years) | |
|
|
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps(2)
|
|
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
$ |
389,173 |
|
|
$ |
14,985 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Excludes the margin the Partnership pays on its floating-rate
debt (please see Note 9). |
|
(2) |
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros
($84.8 million) by the maturity dates of the swap
agreements. |
During April 2005, the Predecessor repaid term loans of
$337.3 million on two LNG carriers and settled related
interest rate swaps. The Predecessor recognized a loss of
$7.8 million as a result of these interest rate swap
settlements. During April 2005, the Predecessor also settled
interest rate swaps associated with 322.8 million Euros
($390.5 million) of term loans and entered into new swaps
of the same amount with a lower fixed interest rate. A loss of
39.2 million Euros ($50.4 million) relating to these
interest rate swap settlements has been deferred in accumulated
other comprehensive income and will be recognized over the
remaining term of the term loans. The cost to settle all of
these interest rate swaps was $143.3 million.
Changes in the fair value of the designated interest rate swaps
(cash flow hedges) are recognized in other comprehensive income
until the hedged item is recognized in income. The ineffective
portion of a derivatives change in fair value is
immediately recognized into income.
F-26
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
The Partnership is exposed to credit loss in the event of
non-performance by the counter parties to the interest rate swap
agreements; however, counterparties to these agreements are
major financial institutions and the Partnership considers the
risk of loss due to non-performance to be minimal. The
Partnership requires no collateral from these institutions.
|
|
14. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
(a) As at June 30, 2005, the Partnership was committed
to the construction of one Suezmax tanker (the Toledo
Spirit) scheduled for delivery in July 2005, at a total cost
of approximately $47.6 million, excluding capitalized
interest. As at June 30, 2005, payments made towards this
commitment totaled $14.3 million, excluding capitalized
interest and miscellaneous construction costs, and long-term
financing arrangements existed for the remaining
$33.3 million contract cost of this vessel. During July
2005, the Partnership sold and leased back this vessel upon its
delivery.
(b) The Partnership has entered into an agreement with
Teekay Shipping Corporation to purchase all of its interest
(which will not be less than a 70%) in Teekay Nakilat, which in
turn indirectly owns three LNG newbuildings and the related
20-year, fixed-rate time charters. The purchase will occur upon
the delivery of the first newbuilding, which is scheduled during
the fourth quarter of 2006. The estimated purchase price of a
100% ownership interest in Teekay Nakilat is approximately
$124.5 million, plus the assumption of approximately
$468.0 million of long-term debt. Should Teekay Shipping
Corporations ownership interest be less than 100%, our
purchase commitment will reduce pro rata.
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation 46, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51
(FIN 46). In general, a variable interest entity
(or VIE) is a corporation, partnership, limited-liability
corporation, trust, or any other legal structure used to conduct
activities or hold assets that either (1) has an
insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal
activities without additional subordinated financial support,
(2) has a group of equity owners that are unable to make
significant decisions about its activities, or (3) has a
group of equity owners that do not have the obligation to absorb
losses or the right to receive returns generated by its
operations. If a party with an ownership, contractual or other
financial interest in the VIE (a variable interest holder) is
obligated to absorb a majority of the risk of loss from the
VIEs activities, is entitled to receive a majority of the
VIEs residual returns (if no party absorbs a majority of
the VIEs losses), or both, then FIN 46 requires that
this party consolidate the VIE.
The Partnership has consolidated Teekay Nakilat in its
June 30, 2005 balance sheet, as Teekay Nakilat has been
determined to be a VIE, with the Partnership being its primary
beneficiary. The Partnerships maximum exposure to loss at
June 30, 2005, as a result of its commitment to purchase
Teekay Shipping Corporations interest in Teekay Nakilat,
is limited to Teekay Shipping Corporations costs related
to the construction and delivery of the three LNG newbuildings
and the cost of capital on construction payments made to the
shipyard.
As at June 30, 2005, the assets of Teekay Nakilat consisted
of the three LNG newbuildings, which had a carrying value of
$140.6 million. These assets have been financed by equity
investments in Teekay Nakilat by Teekay Shipping Corporation.
The assets and liabilities of Teekay Nakilat were recorded at
historical cost as the Partnership and Teekay Nakilat are under
common control. The equity investments in Teekay Nakilat are
accounted for as minority interest in the Partnerships
June 30, 2005 balance sheet.
F-27
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
15. |
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit |
Net income (loss) per unit is determined by dividing net income
(loss), after deducting the amount of net income allocated to
the General Partners interest from the issuance date of
the units of May 10, 2005, as described below, by the
weighted average number of units outstanding during the period.
For periods prior to May 10, 2005, such units are deemed
equal to the common and subordinated units (or the limited
partnership units) received by Teekay Shipping Corporation
in exchange for net assets contributed to the Partnership, or
23,469,144 units.
As required by Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-6,
Participating Securities and Two-Class Method under FASB
Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share, the General
Partners, common unit holders and subordinated
unitholders interests in net income are calculated as if
all net income for the periods subsequent to May 10, 2005
was distributed according to the terms of the Partnership
Agreement, regardless of whether those earnings would or could
be distributed. The Partnership Agreement does not provide for
the distribution of net income; rather, it provides for the
distribution of available cash, which is a contractually defined
term that generally means all cash on hand at the end of each
quarter after establishment of cash reserves. Unlike available
cash, net income is affected by non-cash items. Net income for
the period from May 10 to June 30, 2005 was
$28.7 million, which included a $23.0 million foreign
currency translation gain relating primarily to long-term debt
denominated in Euros. The limited partners interest in net
income for this period was $19.5 million. The actual cash
distributions made to the limited partners for this period
totaled $7.2 million.
Under the Partnership Agreement, the holder of the incentive
distribution rights in the Partnership, which is currently the
General Partner, has the right to receive an increasing
percentage of cash distributions above the minimum quarterly
distribution. Assuming there are no cumulative arrearages on
common unit distributions, the target distribution levels
entitle the General Partner to receive 2% of quarterly cash
distributions up to $0.4625 per unit, 15% of quarterly cash
distributions between $0.4625 and $0.5375 per unit, 25% of
quarterly cash distributions between $0.5375 and $0.65 per
unit, and 50% of quarterly cash distributions in excess of
$0.65 per unit. During the period from May 10, 2005 to
June 30, 2005, net income exceeded $0.4625 per unit
(prorated for this period) and, consequently, the assumed
distribution of net income resulted in the use of the increasing
percentages to calculate the General Partners interest in
net income.
Under the Partnership Agreement, during the subordination period
the common units will have the right to receive distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in an amount equal to the
minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125 per quarter, plus
any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units from prior quarters, before any
distributions of available cash from operating surplus may be
made on the subordinated units. During the period from
May 10, 2005 to June 30, 2005, net income exceeded the
minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125 per unit
(prorated for this period) and, consequently, the assumed
distribution of net income did not result in an unequal
distribution of net income between the subordinated unit holders
and common unit holders.
(a) In July 2005, Teekay Shipping Corporation announced
that it had been awarded long-term, fixed-rate contracts to
charter two LNG carriers to the Tangguh LNG project in
Indonesia. The carriers will be chartered for a period of
20 years to The Tangguh Production Sharing Contractors, a
consortium led by BP Berau, a subsidiary of BP plc. In
connection with this award, Teekay Shipping Corporation has
exercised shipbuilding options with Hyundai Heavy Industries Co.
Ltd. to construct two 155,000 cubic meter LNG carriers at a
total cost of approximately $450 million. The vessels are
scheduled to deliver in
F-28
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Successor to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.)
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
late 2008 and early 2009, respectively. Teekay Shipping
Corporation is entering into these transactions with an
Indonesian partner who has taken a 30% interest in the vessels
and related contracts. In accordance with an existing agreement,
Teekay Shipping Corporation is required to offer to the
Partnership its ownership interest in these vessels and related
charter contracts.
(b) In July 2005, Qatar Gas Transport Company Ltd.
(Nakilat) exercised it options to purchase a 30% interest in
three LNG newbuildings, which, upon their delivery, will provide
transportation services under 20-year, fixed-rate time charters
to Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II). As a
result of this exercise, our purchase commitment for these
vessels, referenced above in note 12(e), has been reduced
from $124.5 million to approximately $92.8 million.
(c) In August 2005, Teekay Shipping Corporation announced
that it had been awarded long-term, fixed-rate contracts to
charter four LNG carriers to Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas
Co. Limited (3) (or RasGas 3), a joint venture
company between a subsidiary of ExxonMobil Corporation and Qatar
Petroleum. The vessels will be chartered to RasGas 3 at
fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, for a period of
25 years (with options exercisable by the customer to
extend up to an additional 10 years), scheduled to commence
in the first half of 2008. In connection with this award, Teekay
Shipping Corporation has entered into agreements with Samsung
Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. to construct four 217,000 cubic meter
LNG carriers at a total contract price of approximately
$1 billion. Teekay Shipping Corporation is entering into
these transactions with Qatar Gas Transport Company, which has
taken a 60% interest in the vessels and related contracts. In
accordance with an existing agreement, Teekay Shipping
Corporation is required to offer to the Partnership its
ownership interest in these vessels and related charter
contracts.
F-29
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L.
F-30
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders of
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. (formerly Naviera F. Tapias S.A.) and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of income (loss), changes in
stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months
ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four
months ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004 in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young
LLP
|
|
Chartered Accountants |
Vancouver, Canada,
February 28, 2005
F-31
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(See Basis of Presentation Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Four Months | |
|
Eight Months | |
|
|
| |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
April 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) | |
VOYAGE REVENUES
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
45,628 |
|
|
|
63,540 |
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
53,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
14,238 |
|
|
|
23,169 |
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
29,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(18,109 |
) |
|
|
(34,862 |
) |
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
(40,560 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
8,431 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
13,426 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) (note 7)
|
|
|
(44,310 |
) |
|
|
(71,502 |
) |
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
(34,149 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss) (note 13)
|
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss) net (note 12)
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items
|
|
|
(128,008 |
) |
|
|
(82,601 |
) |
|
|
(1,722 |
) |
|
|
(57,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-32
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(See Basis of Presentation Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) | |
ASSETS |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
21,328 |
|
|
$ |
154,203 |
|
Restricted cash current (note 3)
|
|
|
73,894 |
|
|
|
82,387 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
7,197 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
115,049 |
|
|
|
247,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities long term (note 5)
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long term (note 3)
|
|
|
324,144 |
|
|
|
352,725 |
|
Vessels and equipment (note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $5,829
(December 31, 2003 $92,171)
|
|
|
220,643 |
|
|
|
366,334 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation of $4,233 (December 31, 2003
$18,663) (note 3)
|
|
|
256,504 |
|
|
|
397,932 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (note 14)
|
|
|
125,403 |
|
|
|
49,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment
|
|
|
602,550 |
|
|
|
813,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
26,133 |
|
|
|
20,394 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,457 |
|
Goodwill (note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,069,081 |
|
|
$ |
1,651,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT) |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
5,881 |
|
|
$ |
11,410 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
8,301 |
|
Advance from affiliate (note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,814 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 7)
|
|
|
53,242 |
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases (note 3)
|
|
|
62,684 |
|
|
|
80,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
123,451 |
|
|
|
234,849 |
|
Long-term debt (note 7)
|
|
|
690,447 |
|
|
|
764,758 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases (note 3)
|
|
|
323,053 |
|
|
|
332,417 |
|
Other long-term liabilities (note 9)
|
|
|
96,415 |
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,233,366 |
|
|
|
1,466,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock (note 10)
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
Additional paid in capital (note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,978 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(165,584 |
) |
|
|
(213,230 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(164,809 |
) |
|
|
184,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
$ |
1,069,081 |
|
|
$ |
1,651,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-33
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(See Basis of Presentation Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Four Months | |
|
Eight Months | |
|
|
| |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
April 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) | |
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
Non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (recovery)
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
(1,131 |
) |
|
|
(4,398 |
) |
|
Foreign currency exchange loss (gain)
|
|
|
43,314 |
|
|
|
68,897 |
|
|
|
(16,525 |
) |
|
|
31,144 |
|
|
Interest rate swap loss (gain)
|
|
|
71,400 |
|
|
|
(14,715 |
) |
|
|
(3,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
|
|
(15,275 |
) |
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating
activities (note 15)
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
5,935 |
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
(984 |
) |
|
|
(4,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow
|
|
|
20,418 |
|
|
|
18,318 |
|
|
|
14,808 |
|
|
|
7,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
232,829 |
|
|
|
211,089 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
131,368 |
|
Long-term debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(4,289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(28,946 |
) |
|
|
(291,730 |
) |
|
|
(9,899 |
) |
|
|
(60,644 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(6,425 |
) |
|
|
(4,115 |
) |
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
|
|
(64,950 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,575 |
) |
|
|
(41,316 |
) |
Advance from affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,817 |
|
Proceeds from government grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
(16,853 |
) |
|
|
(242,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,370 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow
|
|
|
176,316 |
|
|
|
(277,616 |
) |
|
|
(25,846 |
) |
|
|
95,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(186,755 |
) |
|
|
(133,628 |
) |
|
|
(5,522 |
) |
|
|
(83,703 |
) |
Purchase of Naviera F. Tapias Gas S.A. (net of cash acquired of
$5,140) (note 11b)
|
|
|
(11,039 |
) |
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,689 |
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
3,929 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
|
|
(2,254 |
) |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow
|
|
|
(199,218 |
) |
|
|
262,766 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
39,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
(10,137 |
) |
|
|
143,012 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year
|
|
|
20,344 |
|
|
|
17,860 |
|
|
|
21,328 |
|
|
|
11,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year
|
|
$ |
17,860 |
|
|
$ |
21,328 |
|
|
$ |
11,191 |
|
|
$ |
154,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-34
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(See Basis of Presentation Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Stockholders | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Paid in | |
|
(Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit) | |
|
Loss | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
(Deficit) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for share data) | |
Balance as at December 31, 2001
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28,370 |
|
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
|
(113,770 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on available-for-sale
securities included in net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Naviera F. Tapias Gas S.A. (note 11b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,152 |
) |
|
|
(1,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,432 |
) |
|
|
(59,432 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on available-for-sale
securities included in net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165,584 |
) |
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164,809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gain on available-for-sale
securities included in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of unrelated businesses (note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at April 30, 2004
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145,373 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,787 |
) |
|
|
(28,787 |
) |
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative instruments
included in net income (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on available-for-sale
securities included in net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(72,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revaluation of assets and liabilities (note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,978 |
|
Transfer of Suezmax purchase obligations (note 11d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,961 |
) |
Sale of Granada Spirit (note 11e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
$ |
439,978 |
|
|
$ |
(213,230 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
184,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-35
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
On April 30, 2004, Teekay Shipping Corporation through its
subsidiary, Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l., acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Naviera F. Tapias S.A. and its
subsidiaries (or Tapias) and renamed it Teekay Shipping
Spain S.L. (or Teekay Spain or the Company).
Teekay Spain is engaged in the marine transportation of crude
oil and liquefied natural gas (or LNG). Teekay Shipping
Corporation acquired Teekay Spain for $298.2 million in
cash, plus the assumption of debt and remaining newbuilding
commitments. The financial statements for the four months ended
April 30, 2004 reflect the period in 2004 prior to the
acquisition of Teekay Spain. The results for the eight months
ended December 31, 2004 reflect the comprehensive
revaluation of all assets (including intangible assets and
goodwill) and liabilities of the Company at their fair values on
the date of acquisition. The amount of the revaluation was
$440.0 million and is presented as additional paid-in
capital.
Prior to the acquisition, Teekay Spain disposed of three
businesses previously held in subsidiaries and unrelated to the
marine transportation operations purchased by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. The consolidated financial statements do not
include the results of these three unrelated businesses.
Proceeds received by the Company from the sale of these
businesses have been accounted for as an equity contribution. In
addition, immediately preceding the closing of the acquisition,
Teekay Spain sold to its then controlling stockholder marketable
securities, real estate, a yacht and other assets (see
Note 12). The consolidated financial statements include the
results of these assets.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Teekay Spain and its majority-owned subsidiaries but exclude the
results of the three unrelated businesses referred to above. The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. Significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
F-36
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets and
liabilities of the Company at April 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term restricted cash
|
|
$ |
85,092 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
7,415 |
|
Vessels and equipment
|
|
|
821,939 |
|
Restricted cash long term
|
|
|
311,664 |
|
Other assets long-term
|
|
|
15,355 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
Time-charter contracts (weighted average remaining useful life
of 19.2 years)
|
|
|
183,052 |
|
Goodwill non-tax deductible ($3.6 million
Suezmax tanker segment and $35.7 million LNG carrier
segment)
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
$ |
1,463,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
98,428 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
668,733 |
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
311,011 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
87,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
1,165,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired (cash consideration)
|
|
$ |
298,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
On November 3, 2004, Teekay LNG Partners, L.P. (or the
Partnership) was formed to ultimately own and operate the
LNG and Suezmax crude oil marine transportation businesses
currently conducted by the Company and to undertake an initial
public offering. At the closing of the initial public offering
of the Partnership, which is expected to occur in the first half
of 2005, the shares of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and its
subsidiary, Teekay Spain, and other assets will be contributed
to the Partnership in exchange for a portion of the common units
and all of the subordinated units of the Partnership and the
issuance to Teekay GP L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, of the 2% general partner interest
in the Partnership and all of the Partnerships incentive
distribution rights. This transfer represents a reorganization
of entities under common control and will be recorded at
historical cost.
The consolidated financial statements are stated in
U.S. Dollars because the Company operates in international
shipping markets, the Companys primary economic
environment, which typically utilize the U.S. Dollar as the
functional currency. Transactions involving other currencies
during the year are converted into U.S. Dollars using the
exchange rates in effect at the time of the transactions. At the
balance sheet dates, monetary assets and liabilities that are
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar are
translated to reflect the year-end exchange rates. Resulting
gains or losses are reflected separately in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income (loss).
|
|
|
Operating revenues and expenses |
The Company recognizes revenues from time charters daily over
the term of the charter as the applicable vessel operates under
the charter. The Company does not recognize revenues during days
that
F-37
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
the vessel is off-hire. All voyage revenues from voyage charters
are recognized on a percentage of completion method. The Company
uses a discharge-to-discharge basis in determining percentage of
completion for all spot voyages, whereby it recognizes revenue
ratably from when product is discharged (unloaded) at the
end of one voyage to when it is discharged after the next
voyage. The Company does not begin recognizing voyage revenue
until a charter has been agreed to by the customer and the
Company, even if the vessel has discharged its cargo and is
sailing to the anticipated load port on its next voyage.
Estimated losses on voyages are provided for in full at the time
such losses become evident. The consolidated balance sheets
reflect the deferred portion of revenues and expenses, which
will be earned or recognized in subsequent periods.
Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage,
including bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and
unloading expenses, canal tolls, agency fees and commissions.
Vessel operating expenses include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. Voyage expenses are recognized ratably over the
duration of the voyage, and vessel operating expenses are
recognized when incurred.
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
The Company classifies all highly-liquid investments with a
maturity date of three months or less when purchased as cash and
cash equivalents.
Cash interest paid on long-term debt, advances from affiliates
and capital lease obligations during the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months ended
April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended December 31,
2004 totaled $30.2 million, $39.7 million,
$14.7 million and $42.3 million, respectively.
The Companys investments in marketable securities are
classified as available-for-sale securities and are carried at
fair value. Net unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of
other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.
All pre-delivery costs incurred during the construction of
newbuildings, including interest, supervision and technical
costs, are capitalized. The acquisition cost (net of any
government grants received) and all costs incurred to restore
used vessels purchased to the standards required to properly
service the Companys customers are capitalized. The
governmental grants relate to the purchase of certain vessels on
the condition that they are built in Spain.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over a
vessels estimated useful life, less an estimated residual
value. Depreciation is calculated using an estimated useful life
of 25 years for Suezmax tankers and 35 years for LNG
carriers from the date the vessel is delivered from the
shipyard, or a shorter period if regulations prevent the Company
from operating the vessels for 25 years or 35 years,
respectively. Depreciation of vessels and equipment for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months
ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004 totaled $16.9 million,
$21.4 million, $7.8 million and $19.0 million,
respectively. Depreciation and amortization includes
depreciation on all owned vessels and vessels accounted for as
capital leases.
Interest costs capitalized to vessels and equipment for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months
ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004 totaled $14.3 million,
$14.0 million, $2.6 million and $2.6 million,
respectively.
F-38
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
Gains on vessels sold and leased back under capital leases are
deferred and amortized over the remaining estimated useful life
of the vessel. Losses on vessels sold and leased back under
capital lease are recognized immediately when the fair value of
the vessel at the time of sale-leaseback is less than its book
value. In such a case, the Company would recognize a loss in the
amount by which book value exceeds fair value.
Generally, the Company drydocks each LNG carrier and Suezmax
tanker every five years. In addition, a shipping society
classification intermediate survey is performed on the
Companys LNG carriers between the second and third year of
the five-year drydocking period. The Company capitalizes a
substantial portion of the costs incurred during drydocking and
for the survey and amortizes those costs on a straight-line
basis from the completion of a drydocking or intermediate survey
to the estimated completion of the next drydocking. The Company
expenses costs related to routine repairs and maintenance
incurred during drydocking that do not improve or extend the
useful lives of the assets. When significant drydocking
expenditures occur prior to the expiration of the original
amortization period, the remaining unamortized balance of the
original drydocking cost and any unamortized intermediate survey
costs are expensed in the month of the subsequent drydocking.
Amortization of drydocking expenditures for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months ended
April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended December 31,
2004 totaled $0.8 million, $2.0 million,
$0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
The Company reviews vessels and equipment for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of
their carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the
assets are expected to generate over their remaining useful
lives. If vessels and equipment are considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized will equal the amount by which
the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair market value.
Loan costs, including fees, commissions and legal expenses, are
presented as other assets and capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the relevant loan.
Amortization of loan costs is included in interest expense.
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets |
Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are not
amortized, but reviewed for impairment annually or more
frequently as impairment indicators arise. Intangible assets
with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives.
The Companys intangible assets, which consist of
time-charter contracts acquired as part of the purchase of
Teekay Spain, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the time charters.
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce
interest rate risks and does not hold or issue derivative
financial instruments for trading purposes. Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (or SFAS) No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
which was amended in June 2000 by SFAS No. 138 and
in May 2003 by SFAS No. 149, establishes accounting
and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging
activities.
Derivative instruments are recorded as other assets or other
long-term liabilities, measured at fair value. Derivatives that
are not hedges or are not designated as hedges are adjusted to
fair value through
F-39
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending upon the nature
of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivatives are
either offset against the fair value of assets, liabilities or
firm commitments through income, or recognized in other
comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item is recognized
in income. The ineffective portion of a derivatives change
in fair value is immediately recognized into income (see
Note 13).
The income the Company receives with respect to its
Spanish-flagged vessels is subject to tax in Spain at a rate of
35% (see Note 12). The Companys Spanish-flagged
vessels are registered in the Canary Islands Special Ship
Registry. Consequently, the Company is allowed a credit, equal
to 90% of the tax payable on income from the commercial
operation of these vessels, against the tax otherwise payable.
This effectively results in an income tax rate of approximately
3.5% on income from the operation of the Spanish-flagged
vessels. Included in other assets are deferred income tax assets
of $1.7 million and $7.9 million at December 31,
2003 and 2004, respectively. Taxes paid during the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months ended
April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended December 31,
2004 totaled $0.4 million, $1.3 million,
$0.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The
Company accounts for these taxes using the liability method
pursuant to SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes.
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
The Company follows SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for
reporting and displaying comprehensive income (loss) and its
components in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company is engaged in the international marine
transportation of crude oil and LNG through the ownership and
operation of its Suezmax tanker and LNG carrier fleet.
The Company has two reportable segments: its Suezmax tanker
segment and its LNG carrier segment. The Companys Suezmax
tanker segment consists of conventional crude oil tankers
operating either on fixed-rate time-charter contracts or on the
spot market. The Companys LNG carrier segment consists of
LNG carriers subject to fixed-rate time charters. Segment
results are evaluated based on income from vessel operations.
The accounting policies applied to the reportable segments are
the same as those used in the preparation of the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
The following table presents voyage revenues and percentage of
consolidated voyage revenues for customers that accounted for
more than 10% of the Companys consolidated voyage revenues
during the periods presented. Each of the customers is an
international energy company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Four Months | |
|
Eight Months | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
April 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in millions) | |
Customer 1 Suezmax tanker segment
|
|
$ |
42.9 |
|
|
|
(72)% |
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
|
(47)% |
|
|
$ |
15.4 |
|
|
|
(38)% |
|
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
|
(36)% |
|
Customer 2 LNG carrier segment
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
(21) |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
(21) |
|
Customer 3 LNG carrier segment
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
(26) |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(18) |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
(18) |
|
Customer 4 LNG carrier segment
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(13) |
|
|
|
* |
Customer accounted for less than 10% of the Companys
consolidated voyage revenues. |
F-40
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
The following tables present results for these segments for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months
ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
54,418 |
|
|
$ |
5,448 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
15,789 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,579 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
6,237 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
10,494 |
|
|
$ |
3,744 |
|
|
$ |
14,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
215,139 |
|
|
$ |
596,269 |
|
|
$ |
811,408 |
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
2,385 |
|
|
|
184,370 |
|
|
|
186,755 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003 |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
54,102 |
|
|
$ |
32,607 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
4,788 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
20,584 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,760 |
|
|
|
5,630 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
3,854 |
|
|
$ |
19,315 |
|
|
$ |
23,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
209,329 |
|
|
$ |
791,259 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,588 |
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
7,220 |
|
|
|
126,408 |
|
|
|
133,628 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
Four months ended April 30, 2004 |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
24,708 |
|
|
$ |
16,010 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
7,196 |
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
8,079 |
|
|
$ |
9,807 |
|
|
$ |
17,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
$ |
5,039 |
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
$ |
5,522 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
F-41
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
Eight months ended December 31, 2004 |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
39,730 |
|
|
$ |
43,385 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
12,806 |
|
|
|
7,509 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
12,853 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
2,889 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
7,744 |
|
|
$ |
21,391 |
|
|
$ |
29,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
55,421 |
|
|
$ |
1,423,191 |
|
|
$ |
1,478,612 |
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
48,989 |
|
|
|
34,714 |
|
|
|
83,703 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
A reconciliation of total segment assets to total assets
presented in the consolidated balance sheet is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total assets of all segments
|
|
$ |
1,000,588 |
|
|
$ |
1,478,612 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
|
22,533 |
|
|
|
154,203 |
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
|
|
45,960 |
|
|
|
18,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$ |
1,069,081 |
|
|
$ |
1,651,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash |
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was a party to capital
leases on two LNG carriers, which are structured as
Spanish tax leases. Under the terms of the Spanish
tax leases, the Company will purchase these vessels at the end
of their respective lease terms in 2006 and 2011, both of which
purchase obligations have been fully funded with restricted cash
deposits described below. As at December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004, the weighted-average interest rates implicit in the
Spanish tax leases were 5.6%, 5.4% and 5.7%, respectively. As at
December 31, 2004, the commitments under these capital
leases, including the purchase obligations, approximated
365.3 million Euros ($497.7 million) (including
imputed interest of 61.9 million Euros, or
$84.4 million), repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
77.1 million Euros ($105.0 million) |
|
2006
|
|
|
123.2 million Euros ($167.8 million) |
|
2007
|
|
|
23.3 million Euros ($31.7 million) |
|
2008
|
|
|
24.4 million Euros ($33.3 million) |
|
2009
|
|
|
25.6 million Euros ($34.9 million) |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
91.7 million Euros ($124.9 million) |
|
F-42
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
During 2003, these two LNG carriers were sold for aggregate
proceeds of $399.2 million and leased back on terms
described above. The sale of these vessels resulted in a gain of
$70.5 million, which has been deferred and will be
amortized over the remaining estimated useful life of the
vessels.
Under the terms of the Spanish tax leases for our LNG carriers,
the Company is required to have on deposit with financial
institutions an amount of cash that, together with interest
earned on the deposit, will equal the present value of the
remaining amounts owing under the leases (including the
obligations to purchase the LNG carriers at the end of the lease
periods). This amount was 308.6 million Euros
($389.8 million) as at December 31, 2003 and
309.5 million Euros ($421.6 million) as at
December 31, 2004. These cash deposits are restricted to
being used for capital lease payments and have been fully funded
with term loans (see Note 7) and a Spanish government
grant. The interest rates earned on the deposits approximate the
interest rate implicit in the Spanish tax leases. As at
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the weighted-average
interest rates earned on the deposits were 5.6%, 5.4% and 5.3%,
respectively.
The Company also maintains cash on deposit relating to certain
term loans, which cash totaled $8.2 million and
$13.5 million as at December 31, 2003 and 2004,
respectively.
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was a party to
operating leases on four Suezmax tankers. On December 30,
2004, the Company transferred its obligation to purchase these
vessels at the end of their respective lease terms to Teekay
Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (see Note 11(d)). Prior to that time,
the Company accounted for the leases as capital leases. As at
December 31, 2004, the commitments under these operating
leases approximated $54.0 million, payable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
21.0 million |
|
2006
|
|
|
17.9 million |
|
2007
|
|
|
3.9 million |
|
2008
|
|
|
3.9 million |
|
2009
|
|
|
3.8 million |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3.5 million |
|
|
|
5. |
Investments in Marketable Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Approximate | |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Market and | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Losses | |
|
Carrying Values | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities long term
|
|
$ |
1,846 |
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities long term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities long term primarily represents
investments in certain Spanish public companies.
F-43
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
6. |
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
As at December 31, 2004, intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
Amortization | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Period | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(years) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-charter contracts
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
182,552 |
|
|
$ |
4,095 |
|
|
$ |
178,457 |
|
All intangible assets were recognized on April 30, 2004
(see Note 1). Aggregate amortization expense of intangible
assets for the eight months ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $6.2 million. Concurrent with the sale of two
Suezmax tankers during 2004, the Company wrote off the remaining
book value of the two related time-charter agreements with an
accumulated amortization of $2.1 million. The
Companys intangible assets are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the time charters.
Amortization of intangible assets for the five years subsequent
to December 31, 2004 is expected to be $9.3 million
(2005), $9.1 million (2006), $9.1 million (2007),
$9.1 million (2008) and $9.1 million (2009).
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 for the Companys
reporting segments, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill acquired (note 1)
|
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
|
$ |
35,631 |
|
|
$ |
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
35,631 |
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2022
|
|
$ |
371,334 |
|
|
$ |
343,390 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2025
|
|
|
372,355 |
|
|
|
443,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, including current portion
|
|
|
743,689 |
|
|
|
787,126 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
53,242 |
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
690,447 |
|
|
$ |
764,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has several term loans outstanding, which, as at
December 31, 2004, totaled $343.4 million of
U.S. Dollar-denominated loans and 325.8 million Euros
($443.7 million) of Euro-denominated loans. A portion of
these loans ($421.6 million) were used to make restricted
cash deposits that fully fund payments under capital leases (see
Note 3).
All Euro-denominated term loans and advances from affiliates
(see Note 8) are revalued at the end of year using the
then-prevailing Euro/ U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Due
substantially to this revaluation, the Company recognized
foreign currency exchange losses of $44.3 million,
$71.5 million and $34.1 million in the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004, and foreign exchange gains of
$18.0 million in the four months ended April 30, 2004.
F-44
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
Interest payments on the U.S. Dollar-denominated term loans
are based on LIBOR (December 31, 2003 1.2%;
December 31, 2004 2.4%) plus a margin. Interest
payments on the Euro-denominated term loans are based on EURIBOR
(December 31, 2003 2.2%; December 31,
2004 2.1%) plus a margin. At December 31, 2003
and 2004, these margins ranged between 0.5% and 1.3%.
The weighted-average effective interest rate for debt
outstanding at December 31, 2004 was 3.7%
(U.S. Dollar-denominated debt) and 3.4% (Euro-denominated
debt). These rates do not reflect the effect of interest rate
swaps that the Company has used to hedge certain of its
floating-rate debt (see Note 13).
The term loans reduce in monthly payments with varying
maturities through 2029. All term loans of the Company are
collateralized by first preferred mortgages on the vessels to
which the loans relate, together with certain other collateral
and guarantees from Teekay Spain.
The aggregate annual long-term debt principal repayments
required to be made for the years subsequent to
December 31, 2004 are $22.4 million (2005),
$16.4 million (2006), $17.6 million (2007),
$19.0 million (2008), $152.0 million (2009) and
$559.7 million (thereafter).
The Companys term loans contain restrictive covenants
including, in some cases, requirements to maintain restricted
cash deposits, unencumbered liquidity and minimum tangible net
worth.
|
|
8. |
Advance from Affiliate |
In December 2004, the Companys direct parent company,
Teekay Spain, S.L. (a subsidiary of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.),
made a loan to it totaling 82.1 million Euros
($111.8 million). These funds will be used to prepay debt
associated with two of the Companys LNG carriers. This
unsecured note bears interest based on EURIBOR plus a margin of
2.09%. As at December 31, 2004, the weighted-average
interest rate outstanding on the loan was 4.4%. For the eight
months ended December 31, 2004, total interest expense
incurred on the loan was 0.1 million Euros
($0.1 million). The loan is repayable on the earlier of
December 31, 2009 and 30 business days from demand.
|
|
9. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Carrying amounts of all financial instruments approximate fair
market value at the applicable date.
The estimated fair market value of the Companys financial
instruments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
$ |
420,571 |
|
|
$ |
420,571 |
|
|
$ |
589,315 |
|
|
$ |
589,315 |
|
Long-term debt (including capital lease obligations)
|
|
|
1,129,426 |
|
|
|
1,129,426 |
|
|
|
1,200,499 |
|
|
|
1,200,499 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 13)
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
96,415 |
|
|
|
96,415 |
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
The authorized capital stock of Teekay Spain at
December 31, 2003 and 2004 was 18,425 shares of common
stock, with a par value of 60.10 Euros per share. As at
December 31, 2003 and 2004, Teekay Spain had
18,425 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
F-45
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
11. |
Related Party Transactions |
(a) Payments made by the Company to companies owned by
former members of the Companys board of directors for
consulting services and miscellaneous office expenses for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 totaled
$0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
(b) On December 20, 2002, the Company purchased
Naviera F. Tapias Gas S.A. (or NFT Gas) from the
controlling stockholder of the Company for 20.0 million
Euros ($21.0 million). All assets and liabilities of NFT
Gas have been presented at their historical values. The excess
of the amount paid over the net assets of NFT Gas on the date of
acquisition ($20.7 million) was accounted for as an equity
distribution.
(c) In December 2004, the Companys direct parent
company, Teekay Spain, S.L., made an interest-bearing loan to
the Company totaling 82.1 million Euros
($111.8 million) (see Note 8).
(d) In December 2004, the Company transferred its
obligation to purchase four Suezmax tankers at the end of their
respective lease terms to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. The
resulting loss of $44.0 million has been accounted for as
an equity distribution.
(e) In December 2004, the Company sold the Granada
Spirit (a single-hulled Suezmax tanker) to a subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation for $26.5 million. The
resulting gain on sale of $4.9 million has been accounted
for as an equity contribution. This sale was done in connection
with a drydocking and re-flagging of the vessel. The
Companys subsidiary operated the vessel on the spot market
until it was sold.
|
|
12. |
Other Income (Loss) net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Four Months | |
|
Eight Months | |
|
|
| |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
April 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,428 |
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of other assets (note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax recovery (expense)
|
|
|
(2,164 |
) |
|
|
(3,033 |
) |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
$ |
617 |
|
|
$ |
(10,934 |
) |
|
$ |
3,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
The Company uses derivatives only for hedging purposes.
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was committed to the
following interest rate swap agreements related to its LIBOR and
EURIBOR based debt, whereby certain of the Companys
floating-rate debt was swapped with fixed-rate obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Fixed | |
|
|
Interest Rate | |
|
Principal | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
Index | |
|
Amount | |
|
Term | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(years) | |
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps(2)
|
|
|
LIBOR |
|
|
$ |
328,459 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps(3)
|
|
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
|
442,401 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes the margin the Company pays on its floating-rate debt
(see Note 7). |
|
(2) |
Principal amount reduces monthly to zero by the maturity dates
of the swap agreements. |
|
(3) |
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros
($95.5 million) by the maturity dates of the swap
agreements. |
F-46
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
Although these interest rate swaps are being used to hedge the
interest rate risk on certain debt described in Note 7, the
Company had not designated them as hedges under current
U.S. accounting guidelines prior to April 30, 2004.
Consequently, any change in fair value of these swaps prior to
April 30, 2004 was recorded in earnings of the period in
which the change in value occurred. During the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003, and the four months ended
April 30, 2004, the Company incurred a loss of
$71.4 million and gains of $14.7 million and
$4.0 million, respectively, due to the change in fair value
of its interest rate swaps. Subsequent to April 30, 2004,
changes in the fair value of the designated interest rate swaps
(cash flow hedges) are recognized in other comprehensive income
until the hedged item is recognized in income. The ineffective
portion of a derivatives change in fair value is
immediately recognized into income.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of
non-performance by the counter parties to the interest rate swap
agreements; however, counterparties to these agreements are
major financial institutions and the Company considers the risk
of loss due to nonperformance to be minimal. The Company
requires no collateral from these institutions.
|
|
14. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was committed to the
construction of two Suezmax tankers scheduled for delivery in
March 2005 and July 2005, at a total cost of approximately
$95.1 million, excluding capitalized interest. As at
December 31, 2004, payments made towards these commitments
totaled $14.3 million, excluding capitalized interest and
miscellaneous construction costs. Long-term financing
arrangements existed for $42.8 million of the unpaid cost
of these vessels. The Company intends to sell upon delivery the
vessel to which the remaining unpaid amount of
$38.0 million relates, but may in the interim finance the
remaining unpaid amount through incremental debt or equity or
surplus cash balances, or a combination thereof (see
Note 16). As at December 31, 2004, the remaining
payments required to be made under the newbuilding contracts
were $80.8 million in 2005.
|
|
15. |
Change in Non-Cash Working Capital Items Related to
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Four Months | |
|
Eight Months | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
(493 |
) |
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
$ |
2,123 |
|
|
$ |
(4,125 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(646 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(2,156 |
) |
|
|
(727 |
) |
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
5,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
911 |
|
|
$ |
5,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In early 2005, the Company completed the sale of the Santiago
Spirit (a newly constructed, double-hulled Suezmax tanker
delivered in March 2005) to a subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation not organized in Spain for $70.0 million.
F-47
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L.
F-48
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholder of
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statement
of loss, changes in stockholder deficit and cash flows for the
nine months ended December 31, 2004. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2004, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for the nine
months ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young
LLP
|
|
Chartered Accountants |
Vancouver, Canada,
February 28, 2005
F-49
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF LOSS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of | |
|
|
U.S. Dollars) | |
VOYAGE REVENUES
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
54,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
29,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMSInterest expense (notes 6 and 7)
|
|
|
(50,485 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
13,519 |
|
Foreign currency exchange loss (note 6)
|
|
|
(78,831 |
) |
Other income net (note 11)
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items
|
|
|
(113,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(84,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-50
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of | |
|
|
U.S. dollars) | |
ASSETS (note 7) |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
156,410 |
|
Restricted cash current (note 4)
|
|
|
82,387 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,197 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
249,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long term (note 4)
|
|
|
352,725 |
|
Vessels and equipment (note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $5,829
|
|
|
366,334 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation of $9,597 (note 4)
|
|
|
629,569 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (note 13)
|
|
|
49,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment
|
|
|
1,045,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20,394 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 5)
|
|
|
178,457 |
|
Goodwill (note 5)
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER DEFICIT |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
11,411 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
19,222 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 6)
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases (note 4)
|
|
|
87,687 |
|
Advances from affiliate (note 7)
|
|
|
454,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
595,401 |
|
Long-term debt (note 6)
|
|
|
764,758 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases (note 4)
|
|
|
513,361 |
|
Other long-term liabilities (note 9)
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,008,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder deficit
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock (note 9)
|
|
|
180 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(79,504 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholder deficit
|
|
|
(123,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholder deficit
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-51
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of | |
|
|
U.S. dollars) | |
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for)
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(84,395 |
) |
Non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(4,398 |
) |
|
Foreign currency exchange loss
|
|
|
77,705 |
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
(5,125 |
) |
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating
activities (note 14)
|
|
|
7,719 |
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
(4,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow
|
|
|
10,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
131,368 |
|
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(60,644 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(64,950 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(41,316 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
180 |
|
Advances from affiliate
|
|
|
409,141 |
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
19,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow
|
|
|
393,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(83,703 |
) |
Purchase of Teekay Shipping Spain, S.L. net of cash acquired of
$11,191 (note 2)
|
|
|
(286,993 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
123,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow
|
|
|
(247,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
156,410 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
|
|
$ |
156,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-52
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Stockholder | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Loss | |
|
Loss | |
|
Deficit | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except number of common shares) | |
Balance as at April 7, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(84,395 |
) |
|
|
(84,395 |
) |
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments (note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative instruments
included in net loss (note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(128,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of Granada Spirit (note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
(79,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(123,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-53
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
On April 30, 2004, Teekay Shipping Corporation through its
subsidiary, Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l., acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Naviera F. Tapias S.A. and its
subsidiaries (or Tapias) and renamed it Teekay Shipping
Spain S.L. (or Teekay Spain). Teekay Spain is engaged in
the marine transportation of crude oil and liquefied natural gas
(or LNG). Teekay Shipping Corporation acquired Teekay
Spain for $298.2 million in cash, plus assumption of debt
and remaining newbuilding commitments.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l., which was incorporated under the
laws of Luxembourg on April 7, 2004, and its wholly owned
or controlled subsidiaries (collectively, the Company).
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. Significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
On November 3, 2004, Teekay LNG Partners, L.P. (or the
Partnership) was formed to ultimately own and operate the
LNG and Suezmax crude oil marine transportation businesses
currently conducted by the Company and to undertake an initial
public offering. At the closing of the initial public offering
of the Partnership, which is expected to occur in the first half
of 2005, the shares of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and its
subsidiary, Teekay Spain, and other assets will be contributed
to the Partnership in exchange for a portion of the common units
and all of the subordinated units of the Partnership and the
issuance to Teekay GP L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, of the 2% general partner interest
in the Partnership and all of the Partnerships incentive
distribution rights. This transfer represents a reorganization
of entities under common control and will be recorded at
historical cost.
The consolidated financial statements are stated in
U.S. Dollars because the Company operates in international
shipping markets, the Companys primarily economic
environment, which typically utilize the U.S. Dollar as the
functional currency. Transactions involving other currencies
during the year are converted into U.S. Dollars using the
exchange rates in effect at the time of the transactions. At the
balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities that are
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar are
translated to reflect the year-end exchange rates. Resulting
gains or losses are reflected separately in the accompanying
consolidated statement of loss.
|
|
|
Operating revenues and expenses |
The Company recognizes revenues from time charters daily over
the term of the charter as the applicable vessel operates under
the charter. The Company does not recognize revenue during days
that the vessel is off-hire. All voyage revenues from voyage
charters are recognized on a percentage of completion method.
The Company uses a discharge-to-discharge basis in determining
percentage of completion for all spot voyages, whereby it
recognizes revenue ratably from when product is discharged
(unloaded) at the end of one voyage to when it is
discharged after the next voyage. The Company does not begin
recognizing voyage revenue until a charter has been agreed to by
the customer and the Company, even if the vessel has discharged
its cargo and is sailing to the anticipated load port on its next
F-54
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
voyage. Estimated losses on voyages are provided for in full at
the time such losses become evident. The consolidated balance
sheet reflects the deferred portion of revenues and expenses,
which will be earned or recognized in subsequent periods.
Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage,
including bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and
unloading expenses, canal tolls, agency fees and commissions.
Vessel operating expenses include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. Voyage expenses are recognized ratably over the
duration of the voyage, and vessel operating expenses are
recognized when incurred.
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
The Company classifies all highly-liquid investments with a
maturity date of three months or less when purchased as cash and
cash equivalents.
Cash interest paid during the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 totaled $42.3 million.
All pre-delivery costs incurred during the construction of
newbuildings, including interest, supervision and technical
costs, are capitalized. The acquisition cost (net of any
government grants received) and all costs incurred to restore
used vessels purchased to the standards required to properly
service the Companys customers are capitalized. The
governmental grants relate to the purchase of certain vessels on
the condition that they are built in Spain.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over a
vessels estimated useful life, less an estimated residual
value. Depreciation is calculated using an estimated useful life
of 25 years for Suezmax tankers and 35 years for LNG
carriers from the date the vessel is delivered from the
shipyard, or a shorter period if regulations prevent the Company
from operating the vessels for 25 years or 35 years,
respectively. Depreciation of vessels and equipment for the nine
months ended December 31, 2004 was $19.0 million.
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation on all owned
vessels and vessels accounted for as capital leases.
Interest costs capitalized to vessels and equipment for the nine
months ended December 31, 2004 were $2.6 million.
Gains on vessels sold and leased back under capital leases are
deferred and amortized over the remaining estimated useful life
of the vessel. Losses on vessels sold and leased back under
capital leases are recognized immediately when the fair value of
the vessel at the time of sale-leaseback is less than its book
value. In such case, the Company would recognize a loss in the
amount by which book value exceeds fair value.
Generally, the Company drydocks each LNG carrier and Suezmax
tanker every five years. In addition, a shipping society
classification intermediate survey is performed on the
Companys LNG carriers between the second and third year of
the five-year drydocking period. The Company capitalizes a
substantial portion of the costs incurred during drydocking and
for the survey and amortizes those costs on a straight-line
basis from the completion of a drydocking or intermediate survey
to the estimated completion of the next drydocking. The Company
expenses costs related to routine repairs and maintenance
incurred during drydocking that do not improve or extend the
useful lives of the assets. When significant drydocking
expenditures occur prior to the expiration of the original
amortization period, the remaining unamortized balance of the
original drydocking cost and any unamortized intermediate survey
F-55
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
costs are expensed in the month of the subsequent drydocking.
Amortization of drydocking expenditures for the nine months
ended December 31, 2004 was $1.1 million.
The Company reviews vessels and equipment for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of
their carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the
assets are expected to generate over their remaining useful
lives. If vessels and equipment are considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized will equal the amount by which
the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair market value.
Loan costs, including fees, commissions and legal expenses are
presented as other assets and capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the relevant loan.
Amortization of loan costs is included in interest expense.
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets |
Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are not
amortized, but reviewed for impairment annually or more
frequently if impairment indicators arise. Intangible assets
with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives.
The Companys intangible assets, which consist of
time-charter contracts acquired as part of the purchase of
Teekay Spain, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the time charters.
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce
interest rate risk and does not hold or issue derivative
financial instruments for trading purposes. Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (or SFAS) No. 133.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
which was amended in June 2000 by SFAS No. 138 and
in May 2003 by SFAS No. 149, establishes accounting
and reporting standards for derivatives instruments and hedging
activities.
Derivative instruments are recorded as other assets or other
long-term liabilities, measured at fair value. Derivatives that
are not hedges or are not designated as hedges are adjusted to
fair value through income. If the derivative is a hedge,
depending upon the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair
value of the derivatives are either offset against the fair
value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments through income,
or recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until the
hedged item is recognized in income. The ineffective portion of
a derivatives change in fair value is immediately
recognized into income (see Note 12).
The income the Company receives with respect to its
Spanish-flagged vessels is subject to tax in Spain at a rate of
35% (see Note 11). The Companys Spanish-flagged
vessels are registered in the Canary Islands Special Ship
Registry. Consequently, the Company is allowed a credit, equal
to 90% of the tax payable on income from the commercial
operation of these vessels, against the tax otherwise payable.
This credit does not apply to gains from vessel dispositions.
This effectively results in an income tax rate of 3.5% on income
from the operation of the Spanish-flagged vessels. Included in
other assets are deferred income tax assets of $7.9 million
at December 31, 2004. Taxes paid during the nine-month
period ended December 31, 2004 totaled $2.0 million.
The Company accounts for these taxes using the liability method
F-56
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
pursuant to SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. The Company may also pay a minimal amount of tax in
Luxembourg, resulting from interest earned on
multi-jurisdictional inter-company loans.
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
The Company follows SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for
reporting and displaying comprehensive income (loss) and its
components in the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
2. |
Acquisition of Teekay Shipping Spain, S.L. |
On April 30, 2004, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Tapias and renamed it Teekay Shipping
Spain S.L. The Company acquired Teekay Spain for
$298.2 million in cash, plus the assumption of debt and
remaining newbuilding commitments. Management believes the
acquisition of the Teekay Spain business has provided the
Company with a strategic platform from which to expand its
presence in the LNG shipping sector and immediate access to
reputable LNG operations. The Company anticipates this will
benefit it when bidding on future LNG projects. These benefits
contributed to the recognition of goodwill. Teekay Spains
results of operations have been consolidated with the
Companys results commencing May 1, 2004.
As at December 31, 2004, the Companys LNG fleet
consisted of four vessels. All four vessels were contracted
under long-term, fixed-rate time charters to international
Spanish energy companies. As at December 31, 2004, the
Companys conventional crude oil tanker fleet consisted of
four Suezmax tankers and two Suezmax newbuildings scheduled for
delivery in 2005. All four Suezmax tankers and one of the
newbuildings were contracted under long-term, fixed-rate time
charters with a major Spanish oil company. One of the
newbuildings will be sold on delivery (see Note 15).
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets and
liabilities of Tapias at April 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term restricted cash
|
|
$ |
85,092 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
7,415 |
|
Vessels and equipment
|
|
|
821,939 |
|
Restricted cash long term
|
|
|
311,664 |
|
Other assets long-term
|
|
|
15,355 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-charter contracts (weighted average remaining useful life
of 19.2 years)
|
|
|
183,052 |
|
Goodwill non-tax deductible ($3.6 million
fixed-rate tanker segment, and $35.7 million fixed-rate LNG
segment)
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
$ |
1,463,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
98,428 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
668,733 |
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
311,011 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
87,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
1,165,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired (cash consideration)
|
|
$ |
298,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
The Company is engaged in the international marine
transportation of crude oil and LNG through the ownership and
operation of its Suezmax tanker and LNG carrier fleet.
The Company has two reportable segments: its Suezmax tanker
segment and its LNG carrier segment. The Companys Suezmax
tanker segment consists of conventional crude oil tankers
operating either on fixed-rate time-charter contracts or on the
spot market. The Companys LNG carrier segment consists of
LNG carriers subject to fixed-rate time-charter contracts.
Segment results are evaluated based on income from vessel
operations. The accounting policies applied to the reportable
segments are the same as those used in the preparation of the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
Four customers, all international energy companies, accounted
for 36% ($29.7 million Suezmax tanker segment),
21% ($17.3 million LNG carrier segment), 18%
($15.2 million LNG carrier segment), and 13%
($10.8 million LNG carrier segment) of the
Companys consolidated voyage revenues during the nine
months ended December 31, 2004. No other customer accounted
for more than 10% of the Companys consolidated voyage
revenues during the nine months ended December 31, 2004.
The following table presents results for these segments for the
nine months ended December 31, 2004. The table includes the
results of Teekay Spain following its acquisition on
April 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
39,730 |
|
|
$ |
43,385 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
12,806 |
|
|
|
7,509 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
12,853 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
7,694 |
|
|
$ |
21,366 |
|
|
$ |
29,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
287,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,423,191 |
|
|
$ |
1,710,249 |
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
48,989 |
|
|
|
34,714 |
|
|
|
83,703 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
A reconciliation of total segment assets to total assets
presented in the consolidated balance sheet is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
Total assets of all segments
|
|
$ |
1,710,249 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
156,410 |
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
|
|
18,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
4. |
Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash |
Suezmax Tankers. As at December 31, 2004, the
Company was a party to capital leases on four Suezmax tankers.
Under the terms of the lease arrangements which
include the Companys contractual right to full operation
of the vessels pursuant to bareboat charters the
Company is required to purchase these vessels at the end of
their respective lease terms for a fixed price. As at
December 31, 2004, the commitments under these capital
leases, including the purchase obligations, approximated
$221.2 million (including imputed interest of
$33.6 million), repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
21.0 million |
|
2006
|
|
|
145.8 million |
|
2007
|
|
|
3.9 million |
|
2008
|
|
|
3.9 million |
|
2009
|
|
|
3.8 million |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
42.8 million |
|
LNG Carriers. As at December 31, 2004, the
Company was a party to capital leases on two LNG carriers, which
are structured as Spanish tax leases. Under the
terms of the Spanish tax leases, the Company will purchase these
vessels at the end of their respective lease terms in 2006 and
2011, both of which purchase obligations have been fully funded
with restricted cash deposits described below. As at
December 31, 2004, the weighted-average interest rate
implicit in the Spanish tax leases was 5.7%. As at
December 31, 2004, the commitments under these capital
leases, including the purchase obligations, approximated
365.3 million Euros ($497.6 million) (including
imputed interest of 61.9 million Euros, or
$84.4 million), repayable as follows:
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
|
|
2005
|
|
77.1 million Euros ($105.0 million) |
2006
|
|
123.2 million Euros ($167.8 million) |
2007
|
|
23.3 million Euros ($31.7 million) |
2008
|
|
24.4 million Euros ($33.3 million) |
2009
|
|
25.6 million Euros ($34.9 million) |
Thereafter
|
|
91.7 million Euros ($124.9 million) |
During 2003, these two LNG carriers were sold for aggregate
proceeds of $399.2 million and leased back on terms
described above. The sale of these vessels resulted in a gain of
$70.5 million, which has been deferred and will be
amortized over the remaining estimated useful life of the
vessels.
Under the terms of the Spanish tax leases for our LNG carriers,
the Company is required to have on deposit with financial
institutions an amount of cash that, together with interest
earned on the deposit, will equal the remaining amounts owing
under the leases (including the obligations to purchase the LNG
carriers at the end of the lease periods). This amount was
309.5 million Euros ($421.6 million) as at
December 31, 2004. These cash deposits are restricted to
being used for capital lease payments and have been fully funded
with term loans (see Note 6) and a Spanish government
grant. The interest rates earned on the deposits approximates
the interest rate implicit in the Spanish tax leases. As at
December 31, 2004, the weighted-average interest rate
earned on the deposits was 5.3%.
F-59
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
The Company also maintains cash on deposit in respect of certain
term loans, which cash totaled $13.5 million as at
December 31, 2004.
|
|
5. |
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
As at December 31, 2004, intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
Amortization | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Period | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(years) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-charter contracts
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
182,552 |
|
|
$ |
4,095 |
|
|
$ |
178,457 |
|
All intangible assets were recognized on April 30, 2004
(see Note 2). Aggregate amortization expense of intangible
assets for the nine months ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $6.2 million. Concurrent with the sale of two
Suezmax tankers during 2004, the Company wrote off the remaining
book value of the two related time-charter agreements with an
accumulated amortization of $2.1 million. The
Companys intangible assets are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the time charters.
Amortization of intangible assets for the five years subsequent
to December 31, 2004 is expected to be $9.3 million
(2005), $9.1 million (2006), $9.1 million (2007),
$9.1 million (2008) and $9.1 million (2009).
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine
months ended December 31, 2004 for the Companys
reporting segments, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as of April 7, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill acquired (note 2)
|
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
|
$ |
35,631 |
|
|
$ |
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
|
$ |
35,631 |
|
|
$ |
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2022
|
|
$ |
343,390 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2025
|
|
|
443,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total, including current portion
|
|
|
787,126 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
764,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has several term loans outstanding, which, as at
December 31, 2004, totaled $343.4 million of
U.S. Dollar-denominated loans and 325.8 million Euros
($443.7 million) of Euro-denominated loans. A portion of
the loans ($421.6 million) were used to make restricted
cash deposits that fully fund payments under capital leases (see
Note 4).
All Euro-denominated term loans and advances from affiliates
(see Note 7) are revalued at the end of each period using
the then prevailing Euro/ U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Due
substantially to this
F-60
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
revaluation, the Company recognized foreign currency exchange
losses of $78.8 million in the nine months ended
December 31, 2004.
Interest payments on the U.S. Dollar-denominated term loans
are based on LIBOR (December 31, 2004 2.4%)
plus a margin. Interest payments on the Euro-denominated term
loans are based on EURIBOR (December 31, 2004
2.1%) plus a margin. At December 31, 2004, these margins
ranged between 0.5% and 1.3%. The weighted-average effective
interest rate for debt outstanding at December 31, 2004 was
3.7% (U.S. Dollar-denominated debt) and 3.4%
(Euro-denominated debt). These rates do not reflect the effect
of related interest rate swaps that the Company has used to
hedge certain of its floating-rate debt (see Note 12).
The term loans reduce in monthly payments with varying
maturities through 2025. All term loans of the Company are
collateralized by first preferred mortgages on the vessels to
which the loans relate, together with certain other collateral
and guarantees from Teekay Spain.
The aggregate annual long-term debt principal repayments
required to be made for the years subsequent to
December 31, 2004 are $22.4 million (2005),
$16.4 million (2006), $17.6 million (2007),
$19.0 million (2008), $152.0 million (2009) and
$559.7 million (thereafter).
The Companys term loans contain restrictive covenants
including, in some cases, requirements to maintain restricted
cash deposits, unencumbered liquidity and minimum tangible net
worth.
|
|
7. |
Advances from Affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
Euro-denominated Demand Promissory Notes
|
|
$ |
371,073 |
|
Euro-denominated Participating Loan
|
|
|
94,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
465,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys parent company, Teekay Shipping Corporation,
has made several loans to it totaling 256.4 million Euros
($349.2 million) for the purchase of Teekay Spain (see
Note 2). Subsequent to the purchase of Teekay Spain, Teekay
Shipping Corporation made a loan totaling 77.4 million
Euros ($105.5 million) to the Company. These funds will be
used to prepay debt associated with two of the Companys
LNG carriers. The Demand Promissory Notes bear interest based on
EURIBOR plus margins ranging from 1.7% to 2.5%. As at
December 31, 2004, the weighted-average interest rate
outstanding on the Companys Demand Promissory Notes was
4.0%. The Participating Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of
5.4% plus a variable component (not exceeding 6%) based on the
Companys net cash flow. As at December 31, 2004, the
interest rate outstanding on the Companys Participating
Loan was 5.4%. For the nine months ended December 31, 2004,
total interest expense incurred on the Demand Promissory Notes
and the Participating Loan was 8.1 million Euros
($10.1 million). The Demand Promissory Notes, which are
collateralized by the Companys assets, are repayable upon
the earlier of December 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009
for the 77.4 million Euro loan) and 30 business days from
demand. The Participating Loan, which is unsecured, is repayable
on April 28, 2014.
F-61
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
8. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Carrying amounts of all financial instruments approximate fair
market value at the applicable date.
The estimated fair value of the Companys financial
instruments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
$ |
591,522 |
|
|
$ |
591,522 |
|
Long-term debt (including capital lease obligations)
|
|
|
1,388,174 |
|
|
|
1,388,174 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
The authorized capital stock of the Company at December 31,
2004 was 1,500 shares of common stock, with a par value of
100.00 Euros per share. As at December 31, 2004, the
Company had 1,500 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding.
|
|
10. |
Related Party Transactions |
In December 2004, a subsidiary of the Company sold the
Granada Spirit (a single-hulled Suezmax tanker) to a
subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation for
$26.5 million. The resulting gain on sale of
$4.9 million has been accounted for as an equity
contribution. This sale was done in connection with a drydocking
and re-flagging of the vessel. The Companys subsidiary
operated the vessel on the spot market until it was sold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
$ |
3,428 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(967 |
) |
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
The Company uses derivatives only for hedging purposes.
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was committed to the
following interest rate swap agreements related to its LIBOR and
EURIBOR based debt, whereby certain of the Companys
floating-rate debt was swapped with fixed-rate obligations:
F-62
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Fixed | |
|
|
Interest Rate | |
|
Principal | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
Index | |
|
Amount | |
|
Term | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(years) | |
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps(2)
|
|
|
LIBOR |
|
|
$ |
328,459 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps(3)
|
|
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
|
442,401 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes the margin the Company pays on its floating-rate debt
(see Note 6). |
|
(2) |
Principal amount reduces monthly to zero by the maturity dates
of the swap agreements. |
|
(3) |
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros
($95.5 million) by the maturity dates of the swap
agreements. |
Changes in the fair value of the designated interest rate swaps
(cash flow hedges) are recognized in other comprehensive income
until the hedged item is recognized in income. The ineffective
portion of a derivatives change in fair value is
immediately recognized into income.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of
non-performance by the counter parties to the interest rate swap
agreements; however, counterparties to these agreements are
major financial institutions and the Company considers the risk
of loss due to nonperformance to be minimal. The Company
requires no collateral from these institutions.
|
|
13. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was committed to the
construction of two Suezmax tankers scheduled for delivery in
March 2005 and July 2005, at a total cost of approximately
$95.1 million, excluding capitalized interest. As at
December 31, 2004, payments made towards these commitments
totaled $14.3 million, excluding capitalized interest and
miscellaneous construction costs. Long-term financing
arrangements existed for $42.8 million of the unpaid cost
of these vessels. The Company intends to sell upon delivery the
vessel to which a remaining unpaid amount of $38.0 million
relates, but may in the interim finance the remaining unpaid
amount through incremental debt or equity or surplus cash
balances, or a combination thereof (see Note 15). As at
December 31, 2004, the remaining payments required to be
made under these newbuilding contracts were $80.8 million
in 2005.
|
|
14. |
Change in Non-Cash Working Capital Items Related to
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
(4,125 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(806 |
) |
Accounts payable
|
|
|
5,865 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
In early 2005, a subsidiary of the Company completed the sale of
the Santiago Spirit (a newly constructed double-hulled
Suezmax tanker delivered in March 2005) to a subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation not organized in Spain for
$70.0 million.
F-63
AUDITED BALANCE SHEET
OF
TEEKAY GP L.L.C.
F-64
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Member of
TEEKAY GP L.L.C.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Teekay GP
L.L.C. as of December 31, 2004. The balance sheet is the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this balance sheet
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
balance sheet. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall balance sheet presentation. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the balance sheet referred to above presents
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Teekay GP L.L.C. at December 31, 2004 in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young
LLP
|
|
Chartered Accountants |
Vancouver, Canada,
October 28, 2005
F-65
TEEKAY GP L.L.C.
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(U.S. Dollars) | |
ASSETS |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
Investment in Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS EQUITY |
|
Members equity
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this balance
sheet.
F-66
TEEKAY GP L.L.C.
NOTES TO BALANCE SHEET
(U.S. Dollars)
Teekay GP L.L.C. (or the Company), a Marshall Islands
limited liability company, was formed on November 2, 2004
to become the general partner of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (or
the Partnership). The Company is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation. On November 9,
2004, Teekay Shipping Corporation contributed $1,000 to the
Company in exchange for a 100% ownership interest. The Company
has invested $20 in the Partnership for its 2% general partner
interest. There have been no other transactions involving the
Company as at December 31, 2004.
On November 3, 2004, Teekay Shipping Corporation formed the
Partnership to own and operate the liquefied natural gas and
Suezmax crude oil marine transportation businesses conducted by
Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (or Luxco) and its
subsidiaries (collectively, the Predecessor). On
May 6, 2005, Teekay Shipping Corporation contributed to the
Partnership all of the outstanding shares of Luxco, all but
$54.9 million of the notes receivable from Luxco, and all
of the equity interests of Granada Spirit L.L.C. (which owns the
Suezmax tanker, the Granada Spirit), in connection with
the Partnerships initial public offering of common units,
which represent limited partner interests in the Partnership.
The Partnership subsequently repaid the $54.9 million note
receivable. In exchange for the equity interests and assets,
Teekay Shipping Corporation received 8,734,572 common units and
14,734,572 subordinated units from the Partnership. The Company
received a 2% general partner interest and all of the incentive
distribution rights in the Partnership.
F-67
APPENDIX A
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
|
|
|
Adjusted operating surplus: |
|
For any period, operating surplus generated during that period
is adjusted to: |
|
|
|
(a) Decrease operating surplus by: |
|
|
|
(1) any
net increase in working capital borrowings with respect to that
period; and |
|
|
|
(2) any
net reduction in cash reserves for operating expenditures with
respect to that period not relating to an operating expenditure
made with respect to that period; and |
|
|
|
(b) increase operating surplus by: |
|
|
|
(1) any
net decrease in working capital borrowings with respect to that
period; and |
|
|
|
(2) any
net increase in cash reserves for operating expenditures with
respect to that period required by any debt instrument for the
repayment of principal, interest or premium. |
|
|
|
Adjusted operating surplus does not include that portion of
operating surplus included in clauses (a)(1) and (a)(2) of
the definition of operating surplus. |
|
Available cash: |
|
For any quarter ending prior to liquidation: |
|
|
|
(a) the sum of: |
|
|
|
(1) all
cash and cash equivalents of Teekay LNG Partners and its
subsidiaries on hand at the end of that quarter; and |
|
|
|
(2) all
additional cash and cash equivalents of Teekay LNG Partners and
its subsidiaries on hand on the date of determination of
available cash for that quarter resulting from working capital
borrowings made after the end of that quarter; |
|
|
|
(b) less the amount of cash reserves established by our
general partner to: |
|
|
|
(1) provide
for the proper conduct of the business of Teekay LNG Partners
and its subsidiaries (including reserves for future capital
expenditures and for future credit needs of Teekay LNG Partners
and its subsidiaries) after that quarter; |
|
|
|
(2) comply
with applicable law or any debt instrument or other agreement or
obligation to which Teekay LNG Partners or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or its assets are subject; and |
|
|
|
(3) provide
funds for minimum quarterly distributions and cumulative common
unit arrearages for any one or more of the next four quarters; |
|
|
|
provided, however, that the general partner may not
establish cash reserves for distributions to the subordinated
units unless our general partner has determined that the
establishment of reserves will not |
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
prevent Teekay LNG Partners from distributing the minimum
quarterly distribution on all common units and any cumulative
common unit arrearages thereon for the next four
quarters; and |
|
|
|
provided, further, that disbursements made by Teekay LNG
Partners or any of its subsidiaries or cash reserves
established, increased or reduced after the end of that quarter
but on or before the date of determination of available cash for
that quarter shall be deemed to have been made, established,
increased or reduced, for purposes of determining available
cash, within that quarter if our general partner so determines. |
|
Bareboat charter: |
|
A charter in which the customer (the charterer) pays a fixed
daily rate for a fixed period of time for the full use of the
vessel and becomes responsible for all crewing, management and
navigation of the vessel and the expenses therefor. |
|
Boil-off: |
|
LNG that evaporates during its transport voyage and converts
into natural gas, which is then used to assist in propelling the
LNG carrier. |
|
Bunkers: |
|
Any hydrocarbon mineral oil used or intended to be used for the
operation or propulsion of a ship. |
|
Capital account: |
|
The capital account maintained for a partner under the
partnership agreement. The capital account in respect of a
general partner interest, a common unit, a subordinated unit, an
incentive distribution right or other partnership interest will
be the amount which that capital account would be if that
general partner interest, common unit, subordinated unit,
incentive distribution right or other partnership interest were
the only interest in Teekay LNG Partners held by a partner. |
|
Capital surplus: |
|
All available cash distributed by us from any source will be
treated as distributed from operating surplus until the sum of
all available cash distributed since the closing of the initial
public offering equals the operating surplus as of the end of
the quarter before that distribution. Any excess available cash
will be deemed to be capital surplus. |
|
Charter: |
|
The hiring of a vessel, or use of its carrying capacity, for
either (1) a specified period of time or (2) a
specific voyage or set of voyages. |
|
CLC: |
|
International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution
Damage, 1969, as amended. |
|
Closing price: |
|
The last sale price on a day, regular way, or in case no sale
takes place on that day, the average of the closing bid and
asked prices on that day, regular way, as reported in the
principal consolidated transaction reporting system for
securities listed on the principal national securities exchange
(other than the Nasdaq Stock Market) on which the units of that
class are listed. If the units of that class are not listed on
any national securities exchange (other than the Nasdaq Stock
Market), the last quoted price on that day. If no quoted price
exists, the average of the high bid and low asked prices on that
day in the over-the-counter market, as reported by the Nasdaq
Stock Market or any other system then in use. If on any day the
units of that class are not quoted by any organization of that
type, the average of the closing bid and asked prices on that
day as furnished by a professional |
A-2
|
|
|
|
|
market maker making a market in the units of the class selected
by our general partner. If on that day no market maker is making
a market in the units of that class, the fair value of the units
on that day as determined reasonably and in good faith by our
general partner. |
|
COFR: |
|
Certificates of financial responsibility sufficient to meet
potential liabilities under OPA 90 and CERCLA, which owners and
operators of vessels, including LNG carriers, must establish and
maintain with the United States Coast Guard. |
|
Common unit arrearage: |
|
The amount by which the minimum quarterly distribution for a
quarter during the subordination period exceeds the distribution
of available cash from operating surplus actually made for that
quarter on a common unit, cumulative for that quarter and all
prior quarters during the subordination period. |
|
Current market price: |
|
For any class of units listed on any national securities
exchange as of any date, the average of the daily closing prices
for the 20 consecutive trading days immediately prior to that
date. |
|
Double hull: |
|
Hull construction technique by which a ship has an inner and
outer hull, separated by void space, usually several feet in
width. |
|
Dwt: |
|
Deadweight, a measure of oil tanker carrying capacity, usually
in tons, based upon weight of cargo and other items necessary to
submerge the vessel to its maximum permitted draft. |
|
EBITDA: |
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. |
|
Estimated maintenance capital expenditures: |
|
An estimate made by the board of directors of our general
partner, with the concurrence of the conflicts committee, of the
average quarterly maintenance capital expenditures that Teekay
LNG Partners will incur over the long-term. The estimate is made
annually and whenever an event occurs that is likely to result
in a material adjustment to the amount of maintenance capital
expenditures on a long-term basis. |
|
Expansion capital expenditures: |
|
Cash capital expenditures for acquisitions or capital
improvements. Expansion capital expenditures include the cash
cost of equity and debt capital during construction of a capital
asset. Expansion capital expenditures do not include maintenance
capital expenditures. |
|
GAAP: |
|
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. |
|
General and administrative expenses: |
|
General and administrative expenses consist of employment costs
of shoreside staff and cost of facilities, as well as legal,
audit and other administrative costs. |
|
Hire Rate: |
|
The agreed sum or rate to be paid by the charterer for the use
of the vessel. |
|
IGC Code: |
|
International Code for Construction and Equipment of Ships
Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk, which specifies certain
requirements for LNG carriers, including regulations regarding
carrier design and construction. |
|
IMO: |
|
International Maritime Organization, a United Nations agency
that issues international trade standards for shipping. |
A-3
|
|
|
Incentive distribution right: |
|
A non-voting limited partner partnership interest issued to the
general partner. The partnership interest confers upon its
holder only the rights and obligations specifically provided in
the partnership agreement for incentive distribution rights. |
|
Incentive distributions: |
|
The distributions of available cash from operating surplus
initially made to the general partner that are in excess of the
general partners aggregate 2% general partner interest. |
|
Interim capital transactions: |
|
The following transactions if they occur prior to liquidation: |
|
|
|
(a) Borrowings, refinancings or refundings of indebtedness
and sales of debt securities (other than for working capital
borrowings and other than for items purchased on open account in
the ordinary course of business) by Teekay LNG Partners or any
of its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
(b) sales of equity interests by Teekay LNG Partners or any
of its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
(c) sales or other voluntary or involuntary dispositions of
any assets of Teekay LNG Partners or any of its subsidiaries
(other than sales or other dispositions of inventory, accounts
receivable and other assets in the ordinary course of business,
and sales or other dispositions of assets as a part of normal
retirements or replacements); |
|
|
|
(d) the termination of interest rate swap agreements; |
|
|
|
(e) capital contributions; or |
|
|
|
(f) corporate reorganizations or restructurings. |
|
ISM Code: |
|
International Safety Management Code for the Safe Operation of
Ships and for Pollution Prevention, which, among other things,
requires vessel owners to obtain a safety management
certification for each vessel they manage. |
|
ISPS: |
|
International Security Code for Ports and Ships, which enacts
measures to detect and prevent security threats to ships and
ports. |
|
Liquefaction: |
|
The process of liquefying natural gas. |
|
LNG: |
|
Liquefied natural gas. |
|
Long-term charter: |
|
An LNG charter to an entity for a term greater than ten years or
an oil tanker charter for a term greater than five years. |
|
Maintenance capital expenditure: |
|
Cash capital expenditures (including expenditures for the
addition or improvement to our capital assets or for the
acquisition of existing, or the construction of new, capital
assets) if such expenditure is made to maintain over the long
term the operating capacity of or the revenue generated by
Teekay LNG Partners capital assets, as such assets existed
at the time of such expenditure. Maintenance capital
expenditures include the cash cost of equity and debt capital
during construction of a capital asset. Maintenance capital
expenditures do not include expansion capital expenditures. |
|
Newbuilding: |
|
A new vessel under construction. |
|
Off-hire: |
|
The time during which a vessel is not available for service. |
A-4
|
|
|
OPA 90: |
|
The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990, as amended. |
|
Operating expenditures: |
|
All cash expenditures of Teekay LNG Partners and its
subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, taxes,
reimbursements of the general partner, repayment of working
capital borrowings, debt service payments and capital
expenditures, subject to the following: |
|
|
|
(a) Payments (including prepayments and prepayment
penalties) of principal of and premium on indebtedness, other
than working capital borrowings will not constitute operating
expenditures. |
|
|
|
(b) Operating expenditures will not include expansion
capital expenditures or actual maintenance capital expenditures
but will include estimated maintenance capital expenditures. |
|
|
|
(c) Operating expenditures will not include: |
|
|
|
(1) Payment
of transaction expenses (including taxes) relating to interim
capital transactions; or |
|
|
|
(2) Distributions
to partners. |
|
|
|
Where capital expenditures consist of both maintenance capital
expenditures and expansion capital expenditures, the general
partner, with the concurrence of the conflicts committee, shall
determine the allocation between the portion consisting of
maintenance capital expenditures and the portion consisting of
expansion capital expenditures, and the period over which the
maintenance capital expenditures will be deducted as an
operating expenditure in calculating operating surplus. |
|
Operating surplus: |
|
For any period prior to liquidation, on a cumulative basis and
without duplication: |
|
|
|
(a) the sum of |
|
|
|
(1) $10 million; |
|
|
|
(2) all
the cash of Teekay LNG Partners and its subsidiaries on hand as
of the closing date of the initial public offering of Teekay LNG
Partners, other than cash reserved to terminate interest rate
swap agreements; |
|
|
|
(3) all
cash receipts of Teekay LNG Partners and its subsidiaries for
the period beginning on the closing date of the initial public
offering and ending with the last day of that period, other than
cash receipts from interim capital transactions; |
|
|
|
(4) all
cash receipts of Teekay LNG Partners and its subsidiaries after
the end of that period but on or before the date of
determination of operating surplus for the period resulting from
working capital borrowings; |
|
|
|
(5) interest
paid on debt incurred (including periodic net interest payments
under related interest rate swap agreements) and cash
distributions paid on equity securities issued, in each case, to
finance all or any portion of the construction of a capital
improvement or replacement asset and paid during the period
prior to the earlier of the completion of construction or being
abandoned or disposed of; and |
A-5
|
|
|
|
|
(6) interest
paid on debt incurred (including periodic net interest payments
under related interest rate swap agreements) and cash
distributions on equity securities issued, in each case, to pay
the construction period interest, or to pay construction period
distributions or equity issued to finance all or any portion of
the construction of a capital improvement or replacement asset
as described in (5) above, less |
|
|
|
(b) the sum of: |
|
|
|
(1) operating
expenditures for the period beginning on the closing date of the
initial public offering of Teekay LNG Partners and ending with
the last day of that period, including estimated maintenance
capital expenditures and the repayment of working capital
borrowers, but not (x) the repayment of other borrowings or
(y) expenditures incurred in connection with the expansion
or increase in the transportation capacity of our fleet; and |
|
|
|
(2) the
amount of cash reserves established by our general partner to
provide funds for future operating expenditures; provided
however, that disbursements made (including contributions to a
member of Teekay LNG Partners and its subsidiaries or
disbursements on behalf of a member of Teekay LNG Partners and
its subsidiaries) or cash reserves established, increased or
reduced after the end of that period but on or before the date
of determination of available cash for that period shall be
deemed to have been made, established, increased or reduced for
purposes of determining operating surplus, within that period if
the general partner so determines. |
|
RasGas II: |
|
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II), a joint
venture between Qatar Petroleum (formerly Qatar General
Petroleum Corporation) and Exxon Mobil RasGas Inc. (formerly
Mobil QM Gas Inc.), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
ExxonMobil Corporation, established for the purpose of expanding
LNG production in Qatar. |
|
Regasification: |
|
The process of returning LNG to its gaseous state. |
|
Short-term charter: |
|
An LNG charter for a term less than ten years or an oil tanker
charter for a term less than five years. |
|
SOLAS: |
|
International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, which
provides, among other things, rules for the construction and
equipment of commercial vessels. |
|
Spot market: |
|
The market for chartering a vessel for single voyages. |
A-6
|
|
|
Subordination period: |
|
The subordination period will generally extend from the closing
of the initial public offering of Teekay LNG Partners until the
first to occur of: |
|
|
|
(a) the first day of any quarter beginning after
March 31, 2010, for which: |
|
|
|
(1) distributions
of available cash from operating surplus on each of the
outstanding common units and subordinated units equaled or
exceeded the sum of the minimum quarterly distributions on all
of the outstanding common units and subordinated units for each
of the three consecutive, non- overlapping four-quarter periods
immediately preceding that date; |
|
|
|
(2) the
adjusted operating surplus generated during each of the three
consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods immediately
preceding that date equaled or exceeded the sum of the minimum
quarterly distributions on all of the common units and
subordinated units that were outstanding during those periods on
a fully diluted basis, and the related distribution on the
general partner interest in Teekay LNG Partners; and |
|
|
|
(3) there
are no outstanding cumulative common units arrearages. |
|
|
|
(b) the date on which the general partner is removed as
general partner of Teekay LNG Partners upon the requisite vote
by the limited partners under circumstances where cause does not
exist and units held by our general partner and its affiliates
are not voted in favor of the removal; |
|
|
|
provided, however, that subordinated units may convert into
common units as described in Cash Distribution
Policy Subordination Period. |
|
Suezmax tanker: |
|
An oil tanker of a size and capacity that make it capable of
transiting the Suez Canal when fully loaded, and usually filling
within a range of 120,000 to 200,000 dwt. |
|
Tapias: |
|
Naviera F. Tapias S.A., which Teekay Shipping Corporation
renamed as Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. following its acquisition
of Tapias on April 30, 2004, and which Teekay Shipping
Corporation contributed to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. in
connection with the initial public offering of Teekay LNG
Partners. |
|
Tcf: |
|
Trillion cubic feet, a measure of natural gas volume. |
|
Teekay Spain: |
|
Teekay Shipping Spain S.L., formerly Naviera F. Tapias S.A.
prior to its acquisition by Teekay Shipping Corporation on
April 30, 2004, and which Teekay Shipping Corporation
contributed to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. in connection with the
initial public offering of Teekay LNG Partners. |
|
Time charter: |
|
A charter in which the charterer pays for the use of a
ships cargo capacity for a specified period of time. The
owner provides the ship with crew, stores and provisions, ready
in all aspects to load cargo and |
A-7
|
|
|
|
|
proceed on a voyage as directed by the charterer. The charterer
usually pays for bunkering and all voyage-related expenses,
including canal tolls and port charges. |
|
Voyage charter: |
|
A charter in which the charterer pays for the use of a
ships cargo capacity for one, or sometimes more than one,
voyage between specified ports. Under this type of charter, the
ship owner pays all the operating costs of the ship (including
bunkers, canal and port charges, pilotage, towage and
ships agency) while payment for cargo handling charges are
subject of agreement between the parties. Freight is generally
paid per unit of cargo, such as a ton, based on an agreed
quantity, or as a lump sum irrespective of the quantity loaded. |
|
Working capital borrowings: |
|
Borrowings used exclusively for working capital purposes or to
pay distributions to partners made pursuant to a credit
agreement or other arrangement to the extent such borrowings are
required to be reduced to a relatively small amount each year
for an economically meaningful period of time. |
A-8
APPENDIX B
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
This discussion presents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP financial measures included in the
Summary Recent Developments,
Summary Summary Historical and Pro Forma
Financial and Operating Data and Selected Historical
and Pro Forma Financial and Operating Data sections of
this prospectus; |
|
|
|
|
|
Our estimated EBITDA contribution from the three Suezmax tankers
we will acquire upon the closing of this offering during the
12 months following this offering; and |
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures, including
the estimated EBITDA amounts, to our most directly comparable
financial measures under accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (or GAAP). |
|
All tabular amounts included in this Appendix B are stated
in thousands of U.S. dollars.
Net Voyage Revenues. Consistent with general practice in
the shipping industry, we use net voyage revenues (defined as
voyage revenues less voyage expenses) as a measure of equating
revenues generated from voyage charters to revenues generated
from time charters, which assists us in making operating
decisions about the deployment of our vessels and their
performance. Under time charters the charterer pays the voyage
expenses, whereas under voyage charters the ship owner pays the
voyage expenses. Some voyage expenses are fixed, and the
remainder can be estimated. If we, as the ship owner, pay the
voyage expenses, we typically pass on to our customers the
approximate amount of these expenses by charging higher rates
under the contract or billing the expenses to them. As a result,
although voyage revenues from different types of contracts may
vary, the net revenues after subtracting voyage expenses, which
we call net voyage revenues, are comparable across the different
types of contracts. We principally use net voyage revenues, a
non-GAAP financial measure, because it provides more meaningful
information to us than voyage revenues, the most directly
comparable GAAP financial measure. Net voyage revenues is also
widely used by investors and analysts in the shipping industry
for comparing financial performance between companies in the
shipping industry to industry averages.
The following tables reconcile our net voyage revenues with our
voyage revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
52,217 |
|
|
$ |
60,326 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
47,913 |
|
|
$ |
55,234 |
|
|
$ |
54,532 |
|
|
$ |
81,798 |
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
|
$ |
80,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Six | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
May 1, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
May 10, | |
|
Year | |
|
Months | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
17,453 |
|
|
$ |
50,129 |
|
|
$ |
20,364 |
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
|
$ |
70,493 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
|
$ |
15,991 |
|
|
$ |
49,878 |
|
|
$ |
20,291 |
|
|
$ |
118,901 |
|
|
$ |
70,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-1
EBITDA. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (or EBITDA) is used as a supplemental
financial measure by management and by external users of our
financial statements, such as investors, as discussed below.
|
|
|
|
|
Financial and operating performance. EBITDA allows us to
measure the financial and operating performance of our assets
without regard to financing methods, capital structure or
historical cost basis. For instance, our net income is affected
by whether we finance assets or operations with debt or equity
and by changing interest rates. Likewise, our net income is
affected by how much we pay for an asset and that assets
depreciation or amortization schedule. By reviewing our earnings
before the impact of interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, we, our investors and others can understand the
performance of our assets and operations on a more comparable
basis from period to period and against the performance of other
companies in our industry. |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity. EBITDA allows us to assess the ability of our
assets to generate cash sufficient to service debt, make
distributions to our unitholders and undertake capital
expenditures. For example, reviewing our earnings before the
impact of non-cash depreciation and amortization charges, and
before the payment of interest on debt we incur, provides us an
understanding of how much cash is available to pay interest. |
EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income,
operating income, cash flow from operating activities or any
other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented in
accordance with GAAP. EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items
that affect net income and operating income, and these measures
may vary among other companies. Therefore, EBITDA as presented
below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of
other companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
7,349 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,803 |
|
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
14,347 |
|
|
|
16,352 |
|
|
|
12,861 |
|
|
|
26,431 |
|
|
|
12,783 |
|
|
|
27,134 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
36,556 |
|
|
$ |
33,912 |
|
|
$ |
(81,056 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,578 |
) |
|
$ |
36,887 |
|
|
$ |
24,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net operating
cash flow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow
|
|
$ |
19,695 |
|
|
$ |
24,470 |
|
|
$ |
20,418 |
|
|
$ |
18,318 |
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
7,381 |
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
4,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
14,347 |
|
|
|
16,352 |
|
|
|
12,861 |
|
|
|
26,431 |
|
|
|
12,783 |
|
|
|
27,134 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
(11,837 |
) |
|
|
3,428 |
|
Change in working capital
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
(5,935 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss) and change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,984 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) and other, net
|
|
|
(3,196 |
) |
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
(44,156 |
) |
|
|
(72,093 |
) |
|
|
18,059 |
|
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
36,556 |
|
|
$ |
33,912 |
|
|
$ |
(81,056 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,578 |
) |
|
$ |
36,887 |
|
|
$ |
24,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Three | |
|
|
|
Six | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
May 1, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
May 10, | |
|
Months | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(6,571 |
) |
|
$ |
8,090 |
|
|
$ |
28,703 |
|
|
$ |
8,904 |
|
|
$ |
(1,499 |
) |
|
$ |
60,123 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
6,426 |
|
|
|
14,751 |
|
|
|
5,852 |
|
|
|
10,607 |
|
|
|
37,808 |
|
|
|
20,603 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
12,783 |
|
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
19,258 |
|
|
|
5,193 |
|
|
|
8,744 |
|
|
|
8,849 |
|
|
|
14,677 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
2,648 |
|
|
|
(1,672 |
) |
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
36,887 |
|
|
$ |
4,441 |
|
|
$ |
44,747 |
|
|
$ |
38,076 |
|
|
$ |
26,668 |
|
|
$ |
46,141 |
|
|
$ |
97,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net operating
cash flow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
3,596 |
|
|
$ |
11,867 |
|
|
$ |
13,158 |
|
|
$ |
15,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
12,783 |
|
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
19,258 |
|
|
|
5,193 |
|
|
|
8,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
(11,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,282 |
) |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in working capital
|
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps gain and change in accounting principle
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) and other, net
|
|
|
18,059 |
|
|
|
(4,325 |
) |
|
|
28,977 |
|
|
|
20,924 |
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
36,887 |
|
|
$ |
4,441 |
|
|
$ |
44,747 |
|
|
$ |
38,076 |
|
|
$ |
26,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles our estimated range of EBITDA to
our estimated range of net income that the three Suezmax tankers
(the African Spirit, the Asian Spirit and the
European Spirit) we will acquire from Teekay Shipping
Corporation upon the closing of this offering will contribute to
us during the initial 12 months following their
acquisition. We based both these estimates on the fixed rates in
the charters, current vessel operating costs and ship management
fees associated with these vessels and, in addition only for
estimated net income, on interest rates and the estimated net
proceeds of this offering. We may not realize this level of
EBITDA or net income from the vessels. Due to the inherent
uncertainties of accurately estimating our net operating cash
flow for such 12-month period, the following table does not
reconcile EBITDA to such liquidity measure.
|
|
|
Reconciliation of estimated range of EBITDA to
estimated range of Net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower End | |
|
Upper End | |
|
|
of Range | |
|
of Range | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
10,179 |
|
|
$ |
12,179 |
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
6,248 |
|
|
|
6,248 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
19,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-3
Distributable Cash Flow. Distributable cash flow
represents net income adjusted for depreciation and amortization
expense, non-cash interest expense, estimated maintenance
capital expenditures, gains and losses on vessel sales, income
taxes and foreign exchange related items. Maintenance capital
expenditures represent those capital expenditures required to
maintain over the long-term the operating capacity of the
revenue generated by our capital assets. Distributable cash flow
is a quantitative standard used in the publicity-traded
partnership investment community to assist in evaluating a
partnerships ability to make quarterly cash distributions.
Distributable cash flow is not required by GAAP and should not
be considered as an alternative to net income or any other
indicator of our performance required by GAAP. The following
table reconciles our distributable cash flow to our net income
for the three months ended September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
8,904 |
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10,607 |
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated maintenance capital expenditure
|
|
|
4,137 |
|
|
Foreign exchange gain
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
Income tax recovery
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable cash flow
|
|
$ |
13,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
B-4
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
4,000,000 Common Units
Representing Limited Partner Interests
PROSPECTUS
,
2005
Book-Running Manager
Citigroup
A.G. Edwards
UBS Investment Bank
Wachovia Securities
Morgan Stanley
Raymond James
Deutsche Bank Securities
DnB NOR Markets
HSBC
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 6. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
The section of the prospectus entitled The Partnership
Agreement Indemnification discloses that we
will generally indemnify officers, directors and affiliates of
the general partner to the fullest extent permitted by the law
against all losses, claims, damages or similar events and is
incorporated herein by this reference. Reference is also made to
the Underwriting Agreement to be filed as Exhibit 1.1 to
this registration statement in which Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
and its affiliates will agree to indemnify the underwriters
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and to contribute to
payments that may be required to be made in respect of these
liabilities.
|
|
Item 7. |
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities |
On November 3, 2004, in connection with the formation of
the partnership, Teekay LNG Partners L.P. issued to
(a) Teekay GP LLC the 2% general partner interest in the
partnership for $20 and (b) Teekay Shipping Corporation the
98% limited partner interest in the partnership for $980 in an
offering exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act.
On May 6, 2005, in connection with the Teekay LNG Partners
L.P.s initial public offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation
contributed all of the outstanding shares of Teekay Luxembourg
S.a.r.l. and other assets to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. In
exchange for these shares and assets, Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
issued to Teekay Shipping Corporation 8,734,572 common units and
14,734,572 subordinated units. The securities were issued
pursuant to an exemption from registration under
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
There have been no other sales of unregistered securities within
the past three years.
|
|
Item 8. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement* |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the
Registrants Form F-1, declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2005, File
No. 333-120727) |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
|
|
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (incorporated by reference to Appendix
A to the Prospectus contained within the Registrants
Form F-1, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 5, 2005, File No. 333-120727) |
|
3 |
.3 |
|
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Teekay GP L.L.C. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Registrants
Form F-1, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 5, 2005, File No. 333-120727) |
|
3 |
.4 |
|
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
of Teekay GP L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.4 of the Registrants Form F-1,
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 5, 2005, File No. 333-120727) |
|
5 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Opinion of Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP, as
to the legality of the securities being registered* |
|
8 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Opinion of Perkins Coie LLP, relating to tax matters* |
|
8 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Opinion of Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP,
relating to tax matters* |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Form of Credit Facility (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form F-1,
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 5, 2005, File No. 333-120727) |
II-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Form of Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Registrants Form F-1, declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2005, File
No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
|
|
Form of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Registrants Form F-1, declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2005, File
No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
|
|
Form of Omnibus Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrants Form F-1,
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 5, 2005, File No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
|
|
Form of Amendment to Omnibus Agreement* |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
|
|
Form of Administrative Services Agreement with Teekay Shipping
Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the
Registrants Form F-1, declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2005, File
No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
|
|
Form of Advisory, Technical and Administrative Services
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the
Registrants Form F-1, declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2005, File
No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
|
|
Form of LNG Strategic Consulting and Advisory Services Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the
Registrants Form F-1, declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2005, File
No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.9 |
|
|
|
Form of Agreement to Purchase Nakilat Interest (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Registrants
Form F-1, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 5, 2005, File No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
|
|
Syndicated Loan Agreement between Naviera Teekay Gas III,
S.L. (formerly Naviera F. Tapias Gas III, S.A.) and Caixa
de Afforos de Vigo Ourense e Pontevedra, as Agent, dated as of
October 2, 2000, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 of the Registrants Form F-1,
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 5, 2005, File No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
|
|
Bareboat Charter Agreement between Naviera Teekay Gas III,
S.L. (formerly Naviera F. Tapias Gas III, S.A.) and
Poseidon Gas AIE, dated as of October 20, 2000
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the
Registrants Form F-1, declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2005, File
No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
|
|
Credit Facility Agreement between Naviera Teekay Gas IV, S.L.
(formerly Naviera F. Tapias Gas IV, S.A.) and Chase Manhattan
International Limited, as Agent, dated as of December 21,
2001, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 of the Registrants Form F-1,
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 5, 2005, File No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
|
|
Bareboat Charter Agreement between Naviera Teekay Gas IV, S.L.
(formerly Naviera F. Tapias Gas IV, S.A.) and Pagumar AIE, dated
as of December 30, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.14 of the Registrants Form F-1,
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 5, 2005, File No. 333-120727) |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
|
|
Form of Purchase Agreement relating to African Spirit L.L.C.,
Asian Spirit L.L.C. and European Spirit L.L.C.* |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of Teekay LNG Partners L.P.* |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Consent of Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP
(contained in Exhibit 5.1)* |
|
23 |
.3 |
|
|
|
Consent of Perkins Coie LLP (contained in Exhibit 8.1)* |
|
24 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Powers of Attorney* |
* Previously filed.
(b) Financial Statement Schedules.
All supplemental schedules are omitted because of the absence of
conditions under which they are required or because the
information is shown in the financial statements or notes
thereto.
II-2
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers
and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
|
|
|
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective. |
|
|
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds
to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form F-1 and has duly caused this Amendment No. 2 to
the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Nassau,
Commonwealth of The Bahamas, on November 14, 2005.
|
|
|
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. |
|
|
By: Teekay GP LLC, its General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Bruce C. Bell |
|
Title: Secretary |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement
has been signed on November 14, 2005 by or on behalf of the
following persons in the capacities indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
*
Peter
Evensen |
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer), Director and
Authorized Representative in the United States |
|
*
C. Sean
Day |
|
Director |
|
*
Bjorn
Moller |
|
Director |
|
*
Robert
E. Boyd |
|
Director |
|
*
Ida
Jane Hinkley |
|
Director |
|
*
Ihab
J.M. Massoud |
|
Director |
|
*
George
Watson |
|
Director |
|
*By: /s/ Bruce C. Bell
Bruce
C. Bell, Attorney-in-fact |
|
|
II-4