e424b4
PROSPECTUS
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4)
File No. 333-120727
6,000,000 Common Units
Representing Limited Partner Interests
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
$22.00 per common unit
We are
selling 6,000,000 common units. We have granted the
underwriters an option to purchase up to 900,000 additional
common units to cover over-allotments, if any.
We are a
Marshall Islands limited partnership recently formed by Teekay
Shipping Corporation as part of its strategy to expand its
operations in the liquefied natural gas (or LNG) marine
transportation sector. This is the initial public offering of
our common units. Holders of common units are entitled to
receive distributions of available cash of $0.4125 per
quarter, or $1.65 on an annualized basis, before any
distributions are paid on our subordinated units. We will only
make these distributions to the extent we have sufficient cash
from operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment
of fees and expenses. The common units have been approved for
listing on the New York Stock Exchange, subject to official
notice of issuance, under the symbol TGP.
Investing
in our common units involves risk. Please read Risk
Factors beginning on page 20.
These
risks include the following:
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to
pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our common units
following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees
and expenses. |
|
|
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain and
expand the operating capacity of our fleet, which will reduce
our cash available for distribution. |
|
|
Our substantial debt levels may limit our ability to obtain
additional financing, pursue other business opportunities and
pay distributions to you. |
|
|
We derive a substantial majority of our revenues from three
customers, and the loss of any customer, time charter or vessel
could result in a significant loss of revenues and cash flow. |
|
|
We depend on Teekay Shipping Corporation to assist us in
operating our business, competing in our markets, and providing
interim financing for three new LNG carriers. |
|
|
Our growth depends on continued growth in demand for LNG and LNG
shipping. |
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates may engage in
competition with us. |
|
|
Our general partner and its affiliates have conflicts of
interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may permit them to
favor their own interests to your detriment. |
|
|
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot remove our
general partner without its consent. |
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$6.38 per common unit. |
|
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our income
even if you do not receive any cash distributions from us. |
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Unit | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Public Offering Price
|
|
$ |
22.00 |
|
|
$ |
132,000,000 |
|
Underwriting Discount(1)
|
|
$ |
1.4575 |
|
|
$ |
8,745,000 |
|
Proceeds to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (before expenses)
|
|
$ |
20.5425 |
|
|
$ |
123,255,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes structuring fees payable to Citigroup Global Markets
Inc. of $500,000. |
The
underwriters expect to deliver the common units on or about
May 10, 2005.
Citigroup
UBS Investment Bank
|
|
|
|
|
A.G. Edwards
Raymond James |
|
Jefferies & Company, Inc. |
|
Wachovia Securities
Deutsche Bank Securities |
May 4, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
v
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
|
B-1 |
|
|
|
|
C-1 |
|
|
|
|
D-1 |
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized any other person to provide you with different
information. If anyone provides you with different or
inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not,
and the underwriters are not, making an offer to sell these
securities in any jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not
permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in
this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front cover of
this prospectus only. Our business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.
vi
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. Unless we otherwise specify, all references to
information and data in this prospectus about our business and
fleet refer to the business and fleet that will be contributed
to us on the closing of this offering. You should read the
entire prospectus carefully, including the historical and pro
forma financial statements and the notes to those financial
statements. The information presented in this prospectus assumes
that the underwriters over-allotment option is not
exercised. You should read Summary of Risk
Factors and Risk Factors for information about
important factors that you should consider before buying the
common units. We include a glossary of some of the terms used in
this prospectus in Appendix C. Unless otherwise indicated,
all references to dollars and $ in this
prospectus are to, and amounts are presented in,
U.S. Dollars.
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
We are an international provider of liquefied natural gas (or
LNG) and crude oil marine transportation services. We
were formed in November 2004 by Teekay Shipping Corporation, the
worlds largest owner and operator of medium-sized crude
oil tankers, to expand its operations in the LNG shipping
sector. We plan to leverage the expertise, relationships and
reputation of Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates to
pursue growth opportunities in this sector. Upon completion of
this offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation will own a 78.0%
limited partner interest in us and own and control our general
partner.
Our fleet consists of four LNG carriers and five Suezmax class
crude oil tankers. All our vessels are double-hulled, other than
the Granada Spirit, a Suezmax tanker that Teekay Shipping
Corporation has agreed to purchase from us no later than upon
delivery of our new Suezmax tanker scheduled for the third
quarter of 2005.
Our fleet is young, with an average age of approximately
two years for our LNG carriers and approximately
four years for our Suezmax tankers (excluding the
Granada Spirit), compared to world averages of
13.5 years and 9.2 years, respectively, as of
April 1, 2005.
All of our vessels operate under long-term, fixed-rate time
charters with major energy and utility companies, other than the
Granada Spirit. The average remaining term for our
long-term charters is approximately 20 years for our LNG
carriers and approximately 16 years for our Suezmax
tankers, subject, in certain circumstances, to termination and
vessel purchase rights. Until its sale, the Granada
Spirit will operate on a short-term, fixed-rate time charter
to Teekay Shipping Corporation.
In addition to our new Suezmax tanker scheduled for delivery in
the third quarter of 2005, we have also agreed to acquire from
Teekay Shipping Corporation all of its interest in three new LNG
carriers, which interest will be no less than 70%. We expect to
take delivery of the three LNG newbuildings between the fourth
quarter of 2006 and the first half of 2007. Upon their delivery,
the three LNG carriers will provide transportation services to
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II) (or
RasGas II), a joint venture between Qatar Petroleum
and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil
Corporation, established for the purpose of expanding LNG
production in Qatar.
All of our newbuildings will be double-hulled and will operate
under long-term, fixed-rate time charters with major energy and
utility companies. The term of each of our charters for our LNG
and Suezmax newbuildings is 20 years from delivery of the
vessel.
Our fleet was established by Naviera F. Tapias S.A. (or
Tapias), a private Spanish company founded in 1991 to
ship crude oil. Tapias began shipping LNG with the acquisition
of its first LNG carrier in 2002. Teekay Shipping Corporation
acquired Tapias in April 2004 and changed its name to Teekay
Shipping Spain S.L. (or Teekay Spain). As part of the
acquisition, Teekay Spain retained Tapiass senior
management, including its chief executive officer, and other
operating personnel, who will continue to manage the day-to-day
operations of Teekay Spain after the closing of this offering
with input on strategic decisions from our general partner.
Teekay Spain will also obtain strategic consulting, advisory,
ship management, technical and administrative services from
affiliates of Teekay Shipping Corporation.
1
Business Opportunities
We believe the following industry dynamics create a favorable
environment in which to expand our LNG business:
|
|
|
|
|
Strong increase in demand for LNG vessels. Natural gas
represented approximately 23% of world energy consumption in
2001 and is the fastest-growing primary energy source according
to the U.S. Department of Energy. Due to the vast distances
between many areas of natural gas production and consumption and
related impracticalities of building pipelines, seaborne
transportation of LNG provides either the only or the most
cost-effective means of transporting natural gas to many
consuming regions. To meet projected LNG shipping demand, LNG
Shipping Solutions Ltd. estimates that the world LNG carrier
fleet must expand to approximately 364 vessels by 2010 from
its current size of 180 existing vessels and
108 vessels under order or construction as of April 1,
2005. |
|
|
|
Globalization of LNG trade routes. We believe more
opportunities to transport LNG are developing outside
traditional trade routes. We expect the Middle East and Africa
to continue to be increasingly important LNG exporting areas and
Russia, with its vast natural gas reserves, to become an LNG
exporter. We also expect Europe and North America to be among
the major LNG importers. We believe that the increase in the
number and scope of LNG trade routes will result in greater
accessibility to LNG and lead to increased LNG demand. |
|
|
|
Increasing ownership of world LNG carrier fleet by
independent owners. Until recently, major private and
state-owned energy companies owned most of the world LNG carrier
fleet. We believe that the increasing ownership of the world LNG
fleet by independent owners is attributable in part to the
desire of some major energy companies to limit their commitment
to: |
|
|
|
|
|
the marine transportation business, which is non-core to their
operations, and |
|
|
|
the cost of financing new LNG carriers in addition to the high
construction costs of LNG facilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Stringent customer standards favor high-quality
operators. Major energy companies are highly selective in
their choice of LNG transportation partners and impose
increasingly stringent pre-qualification operational and
financial standards that LNG vessel operators must meet prior to
bidding on nearly all significant LNG transportation contracts.
We believe that these rigorous and comprehensive standards will
increase our ability, relative to less qualified or experienced
operators, to compete effectively for new LNG contracts. |
Business Strategies
Our primary business objective is to increase distributable cash
flow per unit by executing the following strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Continue our practice of acquiring LNG carriers after long-term,
fixed-rate time charters have been awarded for an LNG project,
rather than ordering vessels on a speculative basis. |
|
|
|
Expand our LNG operations globally by selectively targeting
long-term, fixed-rate time charters, joint ventures and
acquisitions of vessels or other LNG shipping businesses. |
|
|
|
Leverage our own and Teekay Shipping Corporations
operational expertise to create a sustainable competitive
advantage with consistent delivery of superior customer service
by maintaining high reliability, safety, environmental and
quality standards. |
|
|
|
Manage our fleet of Suezmax tankers to provide stable cash flows
and a source of funding for expansion of our LNG operations. |
2
Competitive Strengths
We believe the following competitive strengths will enable us to
successfully execute our business strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
We have a strategic platform from which to expand our presence
in the rapidly growing LNG shipping sector. |
|
|
|
Our management and the personnel of Teekay Shipping
Corporations subsidiaries who will provide services to us
have extensive experience in fleet expansion. |
|
|
|
We believe our relationship with Teekay Shipping Corporation and
its prominence and extensive customer relationships in the
shipping industry will significantly enhance our growth
opportunities. |
|
|
|
We will supplement our operational experience through continued
access to Teekay Shipping Corporations expertise in
various functions critical to our vessel operations. |
|
|
|
We have financial flexibility to pursue acquisitions and other
expansion opportunities through additional debt borrowings and
the issuance of additional partnership units. |
Summary of Risk Factors
An investment in our common units involves risks associated with
our business, our partnership structure and the tax
characteristics of our common units. Those risks are described
under the caption Risk Factors beginning on
page 20 and include:
Risks Inherent in Our Business
|
|
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to
pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our common units
following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees
and expenses. |
|
|
|
The assumptions underlying the forecast of cash available for
distribution we include in Cash Available for
Distribution Forecasted Available Cash From
Operating Surplus are inherently uncertain and are subject
to significant business, economic, financial, regulatory and
competitive risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those forecasted. |
|
|
|
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the
operating capacity of our fleet, which will reduce our cash
available for distribution. In addition, each quarter our
general partner is required to deduct estimated maintenance
capital expenditures from operating surplus, which may result in
less cash available to unitholders than if actual maintenance
capital expenditures were deducted. |
|
|
|
We will be required to make substantial capital expenditures to
expand the size of our fleet. We generally will be required to
make significant installment payments for acquisitions of
newbuilding vessels prior to their delivery and generation of
revenue. Depending on whether we finance our expenditures
through cash from operations or by issuing debt or equity
securities, our ability to make cash distributions may be
diminished or our financial leverage could increase or our
unitholders could be diluted. |
|
|
|
Our substantial debt levels may limit our flexibility in
obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business
opportunities. |
|
|
|
We derive a substantial majority of our revenues from three
customers, and the loss of any customer, time charter or vessel
could result in a significant loss of revenues and cash flow. |
|
|
|
We depend on Teekay Shipping Corporation to assist us in
operating our business, competing in our markets, and providing
interim financing for three new LNG carriers. |
|
|
|
Our growth depends on continued growth in demand for LNG and LNG
shipping. |
3
|
|
|
|
|
Growth of the LNG market may be limited by infrastructure
constraints and community and environmental group resistance to
new LNG infrastructure over concerns about the environment,
safety and terrorism. |
|
|
|
Our growth depends on our ability to expand relationships with
existing customers and obtain new customers, for which we will
face substantial competition. |
|
|
|
Delays in deliveries of newbuildings could harm our operating
results and lead to the termination of related time charters. |
|
|
|
We may have more difficulty entering into long-term, fixed-rate
time charters if an active short-term or spot LNG shipping
market develops. |
|
|
|
Over time, vessel values may fluctuate substantially and, if
these values are lower at a time when we are attempting to
dispose of a vessel, we may incur a loss. |
|
|
|
We may be unable to make or realize expected benefits from
acquisitions, and implementing our growth strategy through
acquisitions may harm our business, financial condition and
operating results. |
|
|
|
Terrorist attacks, increased hostilities or war could lead to
further economic instability, increased costs and disruption of
our business. |
|
|
|
Our substantial operations outside the United States expose us
to political, governmental and economic instability, which could
harm our operations. |
|
|
|
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur
to our property or result from our operations. |
|
|
|
The marine energy transportation industry is subject to
substantial environmental and other regulations, which may
significantly limit our operations or increase our expenses. |
|
|
|
Exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations will result in
fluctuations in our cash flows and operating results. |
|
|
|
Our limited experience in LNG shipping could affect our ability
to operate profitably and grow. |
|
|
|
We have no history as a separate publicly traded entity and will
incur increased costs as a result of being a publicly traded
limited partnership. |
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
|
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates may engage in
competition with us. |
|
|
|
Our general partner and its other affiliates have conflicts of
interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may permit them to
favor their own interests to your detriment. |
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement limits our general partners
fiduciary duties to our unitholders and restricts the remedies
available to unitholders for actions taken by our general
partner. |
|
|
|
Fees and cost reimbursements, which our general partner will
determine for services provided to us and certain of our
subsidiaries, will be substantial and will reduce our cash
available for distribution to you. |
|
|
|
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot remove our
general partner without its consent. |
|
|
|
The control of our general partner may be transferred to a third
party without unitholder consent. |
|
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $6.38
per common unit. |
|
|
|
|
We may issue additional common units without your approval,
which would dilute your ownership interests. |
4
|
|
|
|
|
In establishing cash reserves, our general partner may reduce
the amount of cash available for distribution to you. |
|
|
|
We have been organized as a limited partnership under the laws
of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a
well-developed body of partnership law. |
|
|
|
Because we are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands,
it may be difficult to serve us with legal process or enforce
judgments against us, our directors or our management. Please
read Service of Process and Enforcement of Civil
Liabilities. |
Tax Risks
|
|
|
|
|
You may be required to pay U.S. taxes on your share of our
income even if you do not receive any cash distributions from us. |
|
|
|
Because distributions may reduce your tax basis in our common
units, you may realize greater gain on the disposition of your
units than you may otherwise expect, and you may have a tax gain
even if the price you receive is less than your original cost. |
|
|
|
The after-tax benefit of an investment in the common units may
be reduced if we are not treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
|
|
|
If the IRS were to treat us as a corporation, we may also be
considered a passive foreign investment company, which may
result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to you. |
|
|
|
You may be subject to income tax in one or more
non-U.S. countries as a result of owning our common units
if, under the laws of any such country, we are considered to be
carrying on business there. Such laws may require you to file a
tax return with and pay taxes to those countries. Any foreign
taxes imposed on us or any of our subsidiaries will reduce our
cash available for distribution to you. |
5
The Transactions
General
We were recently formed as a Marshall Islands limited
partnership to hold interests in entities that own and operate
certain LNG carriers and Suezmax oil tankers operated by Teekay
Spain and its subsidiaries.
Prior to the closing of this offering, Teekay Shipping
Corporation contributed to and loaned us amounts that, together
with existing cash, we used to fully repay debt associated with
two of our LNG carriers and settle interest rate swaps
associated with debt relating to all of our LNG carriers.
At or prior to the closing of this offering, the following
transactions will occur to transfer to us the LNG carriers
(other than the RasGas II vessels, which are under
construction) and Suezmax tankers described in this prospectus
and to effect the public offering of our common units:
|
|
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation will contribute to us: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the capital stock and notes receivable of Teekay Luxembourg
S.a.r.l., which owns Teekay Spain; and |
|
|
|
|
the capital stock of its subsidiary that owns the Granada
Spirit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will issue to Teekay Shipping Corporation
8,734,572 common units and 14,734,572 subordinated units,
representing a 78.0% limited partner interest in us; |
|
|
|
|
|
We will issue to Teekay GP L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, a 2% general partner interest in us
and all of our incentive distribution rights, which will entitle
our general partner to increasing percentages of the cash we
distribute in excess of $0.4625 per unit per quarter; |
|
|
|
|
|
We will issue to Teekay Shipping Corporation promissory notes
with an aggregate principal amount of $129.4 million; and |
|
|
|
|
|
We will issue 6,000,000 common units to the public in this
offering, representing a 20.0% limited partner interest in us,
and will use the net proceeds as described under Use of
Proceeds. |
|
In addition, at or prior to the closing of this offering, we
will enter into the following agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
an omnibus agreement with Teekay Shipping Corporation, our
general partner and others governing, among other things: |
|
|
|
|
|
when we and Teekay Shipping Corporation may compete with each
other; and |
|
|
|
certain rights of first offer on LNG carriers and Suezmax
tankers. |
|
|
|
|
|
services agreements with certain subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping
Corporation pursuant to which those subsidiaries will agree to
provide us administrative services and certain of our operating
subsidiaries strategic consulting, advisory, ship management,
technical and administrative services; |
|
|
|
an agreement with Teekay Shipping Corporation to purchase all of
its interest in the three RasGas II LNG newbuildings and
the related 20-year time charters upon the delivery of the first
vessel, scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2006; |
|
|
|
a short-term, fixed-rate time charter and vessel sales agreement
with a subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation for the
Granada Spirit, our only single-hulled Suezmax
tanker; and |
|
|
|
a $100 million revolving credit facility. |
For further details on our agreements with Teekay Shipping
Corporation, including amounts involved, please read
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.
6
We believe that conducting our operations through a publicly
traded limited partnership will offer us the following
advantages:
|
|
|
|
|
access to the public equity and debt capital markets; |
|
|
|
a lower cost of capital for expansion and acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
an enhanced ability to use equity securities as consideration in
future acquisitions. |
References in this prospectus to Teekay LNG
Partners, we, our, us
or similar terms when used in a historical context refer to the
assets of Teekay Shipping Corporation and its subsidiaries,
including Teekay Spain, that are being contributed to Teekay LNG
Partners L.P. and its subsidiaries in connection with this
offering. When used in the present tense or prospectively, those
terms refer, depending on the context, to Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. or any one or more of its subsidiaries or to
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. and any one or more of its
subsidiaries.
References in this prospectus to Teekay Shipping
Corporation refer, depending upon the context, to Teekay
Shipping Corporation or any one or more of its subsidiaries or
to Teekay Shipping Corporation and any one or more of its
subsidiaries.
Holding Company Structure
We are a holding entity and will conduct our operations and
business through subsidiaries, as is common with publicly traded
limited partnerships, to maximize operational flexibility.
Initially, Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C., a limited liability
company organized in the Marshall Islands, will be our only
directly owned subsidiary and will conduct all of our operations
through itself and its subsidiaries.
7
Organizational Structure After the Transactions
The following diagram depicts our organizational structure after
giving effect to the transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Public Common Units
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Teekay Shipping Corporations Common Units
|
|
|
29 |
|
Teekay Shipping Corporations Subordinated Units
|
|
|
49 |
|
General Partner Interest
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
8
Management of Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
Our general partner, Teekay GP L.L.C., a Marshall Islands
limited liability company, will manage our operations and
activities. The executive officers and three of the directors of
Teekay GP L.L.C. also serve as executive officers or
directors of Teekay Shipping Corporation. For more information
about these individuals, please read
Management Directors, Executive Officers and
Key Employees.
Unlike shareholders in a publicly traded corporation, our
unitholders will not be entitled to elect our general partner or
its directors.
Our general partner will not receive any management fee or other
compensation in connection with its management of our business,
but it will be entitled to be reimbursed for all direct and
indirect expenses incurred on our behalf. Our general partner
will also be entitled to distributions on its general partner
interest and, if specified requirements are met, on its
incentive distribution rights. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions and
Management Reimbursement of Expenses of Our
General Partner.
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries have entered into,
and may enter into additional, services agreements with certain
subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation relating to the
provision to us of administrative services and to such operating
subsidiaries of strategic consulting, advisory, ship management,
technical and administrative services. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Advisory and Administrative Services Agreements.
Principal Executive Offices and Internet Address; SEC Filing
Requirements
Our principal executive offices are located at TK House, Bayside
Executive Park, West Bay Street and Blake Road, Nassau,
Commonwealth of The Bahamas, and our phone number is
(242)502-8820. Our website is located at
http://www.teekaylng.com. We expect to make our periodic reports
and other information filed with or furnished to the SEC
available, free of charge, through our website, as soon as
reasonably practicable after those reports and other information
are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Information on our website or any other website is not
incorporated by reference into this prospectus and does not
constitute a part of this prospectus. Please see Where You
Can Find More Information for an explanation of our
reporting requirements as a foreign private issuer.
Summary of Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties
Teekay GP L.L.C., our general partner, has a legal duty to
manage us in a manner beneficial to our unitholders. This legal
duty is commonly referred to as a fiduciary duty.
However, because Teekay GP L.L.C. is owned by Teekay
Shipping Corporation, the officers and directors of
Teekay GP L.L.C. also have fiduciary duties to manage the
business of Teekay GP L.L.C. in a manner beneficial to
Teekay Shipping Corporation. In addition:
|
|
|
|
|
the executive officers and three of the directors of
Teekay GP L.L.C. also serve as executive officers or
directors of Teekay Shipping Corporation, and another director
of Teekay GP L.L.C. is employed by an affiliate of Teekay
Shipping Corporation; |
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its other affiliates may engage
in competition with us; and |
|
|
|
we and certain of our operating subsidiaries have entered into
arrangements, and may enter into additional arrangements, with
Teekay Shipping Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries
relating to the sale of certain vessels, the purchase of
additional vessels, the provision of certain services and other
matters. |
Please read Management Directors, Executive
Officers and Key Employees and Certain Relationships
and Related Party Transactions.
9
As a result of these relationships, conflicts of interest may
arise in the future between us and our unitholders, on the one
hand, and Teekay Shipping Corporation and its other affiliates,
including our general partner, on the other hand. For a more
detailed description of the conflicts of interest and fiduciary
duties of our general partner, please read Conflicts of
Interest and Fiduciary Duties.
In addition, our partnership agreement contains provisions that
reduce the standards to which our general partner would
otherwise be held under Marshall Islands law. For example, our
partnership agreement limits the liability and reduces the
fiduciary duties of our general partner to our unitholders. Our
partnership agreement also restricts the remedies available to
unitholders. By purchasing a common unit, you are treated as
having agreed to the modified standard of fiduciary duties and
to certain actions that may be taken by our general partner, all
as set forth in the partnership agreement. Please read
Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties for a
description of the fiduciary duties that would otherwise be
imposed on our general partner under Marshall Islands law, the
material modifications of those duties contained in our
partnership agreement and certain legal rights and remedies
available to our unitholders under Marshall Islands law.
For a description of our other relationships with our
affiliates, please read Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions.
10
The Offering
|
|
|
|
Common units offered to the public |
|
6,000,000 common units. |
|
|
|
|
|
6,900,000 common units if the underwriters exercise their
over-allotment option in full. |
|
|
|
Units outstanding after this offering |
|
14,734,572 common units and 14,734,572 subordinated units, each
representing a 49% limited partner interest in us, assuming no
exercise of the over-allotment option. |
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering to: |
|
|
|
|
repay $119.4 million of debt we owe to Teekay
Shipping Corporation; and |
|
|
|
|
|
pay $3.4 million of estimated expenses
associated with this offering and the related transactions,
excluding structuring fees. |
|
|
|
|
|
The net proceeds from any exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option will be used to repay all or a portion of
an interest-bearing note to Teekay Shipping Corporation and, to
the extent of any excess net proceeds, for general working
capital purposes or to repay additional debt. |
|
|
Cash distributions |
|
We intend to make minimum quarterly distributions of
$0.4125 per common unit to the extent we have sufficient
cash from operations after establishment of cash reserves and
payment of fees and expenses, including payments to our general
partner. In general, we will pay any cash distributions we make
each quarter in the following manner: |
|
|
|
first, 98% to the holders of common units and 2% to
our general partner, until each common unit has received a
minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125 plus any arrearages
from prior quarters; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the holders of subordinated units and
2% to our general partner, until each subordinated unit has
received a minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125; and |
|
|
|
third, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
our general partner, until each unit has received an aggregate
distribution of $0.4625. |
|
|
|
If cash distributions exceed $0.4625 per unit in a quarter,
our general partner will receive increasing percentages, up to
50%, of the cash we distribute in excess of that amount. We
refer to these distributions as incentive
distributions. |
|
|
|
We must distribute all of our cash on hand at the end of each
quarter, less reserves established by our general partner to
provide for the proper conduct of our business, to comply with
any applicable debt instruments or to provide funds for future
distributions. We refer to this cash as available
cash, and we define its |
11
|
|
|
|
|
meaning in our partnership agreement and in the glossary of
terms attached as Appendix C. The amount of available cash
may be greater than or less than the aggregate amount of the
minimum quarterly distribution to be distributed on all units. |
|
|
|
|
Our pro forma, as adjusted available cash from operating surplus
generated during 2004, on a pro forma basis assuming this
offering and related transactions occurred on January 1,
2004, would have been $58.0 million. The pro forma, as
adjusted available cash from operating surplus for 2004 would
have been sufficient to allow us to pay the full minimum
quarterly distribution on all of our units. Please read
Cash Available for Distribution
Pro Forma, As Adjusted Available Cash From Operating
Surplus and Appendix D to this prospectus. |
|
|
|
|
We have included a forecast of our cash available for
distribution for the 12 months ending March 31, 2006
in Cash Available for Distribution Forecasted
Available Cash From Operating Surplus. We believe, based
on our financial forecast and related assumptions, that we will
have sufficient cash from operations, including working capital
borrowings, to enable us to pay the full minimum quarterly
distribution of $0.4125 on all units for each quarter through
March 31, 2006. |
|
Subordinated units |
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation will initially own all of our
subordinated units. The principal difference between our common
units and subordinated units is that in any quarter during the
subordination period the subordinated units are entitled to
receive the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125 only after
the common units have received the minimum quarterly
distribution and arrearages in the payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution from prior quarters. Subordinated units
will not accrue arrearages. The subordination period will end
once we meet the financial tests in the partnership agreement,
but it generally cannot end before March 31, 2010. These
financial tests require us to have earned and paid the minimum
quarterly distribution on all of our outstanding units for three
consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods. |
|
|
|
When the subordination period ends, all remaining subordinated
units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis, and
the common units will no longer be entitled to arrearages. |
|
Early conversion of subordinated units |
|
If we meet the financial tests in the partnership agreement for
any three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
ending on or after March 31, 2008, 25% of the subordinated
units will convert into common units. If we meet these tests for
any three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
ending on or after March 31, 2009, an additional 25% of the
subordinated units will convert into common units. The early
conversion of the second 25% of the subordinated units may not
occur until at least one year after the early conversion of the
first 25% of subordinated units. |
12
|
|
|
Issuance of additional units |
|
We can issue an unlimited number of units without the consent of
our unitholders. |
|
Limited voting rights |
|
Our general partner will manage and operate us. Unlike the
holders of common stock in a corporation, you will have only
limited voting rights on matters affecting our business. You
will have no right to elect our general partner or the directors
of our general partner on an annual or other continuing basis.
Our general partner may not be removed except by a vote of the
holders of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding units, including any units owned by our
general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single
class. As a result, you will initially be unable to remove our
general partner without its consent because Teekay Shipping
Corporation will own sufficient units upon completion of this
offering to be able to prevent the general partners
removal. Please read The Partnership Agreement
Voting Rights. |
|
Limited call right |
|
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the outstanding common units, our general partner
has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase all, but not
less than all, of the remaining common units at a price not less
than the then-current market price of the common units. Our
general partner is not obligated to obtain a fairness opinion
regarding the value of the common units to be repurchased by it
upon the exercise of this limited call right. |
|
Estimated ratio of taxable income to distributions |
|
We estimate that if you hold the common units you purchase in
this offering through December 31, 2007, you will be
allocated, on a cumulative basis, an amount of U.S. federal
taxable income for that period that will be 20% or less of the
cash distributed to you with respect to that period. For
example, if you receive an annual distribution of $1.65 per
unit, we estimate that your allocable U.S. federal taxable
income per year will be no more than $0.33 per unit. Please
read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Consequences of Unit
Ownership Ratio of Taxable Income to
Distributions for the basis of this estimate. |
|
Material U.S. federal income tax consequences |
|
For a discussion of other material federal income tax
consequences that may be relevant to prospective unitholders who
are individual citizens or residents of the United States,
please read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences. |
|
Material non-U.S. tax consequences |
|
For a discussion of material non-U.S. tax consequences that may
be relevant to prospective unitholders, please read
Business Taxation of the Partnership and
Non-United States Tax Consequences. |
|
Exchange listing |
|
The common units have been approved for listing on the New York
Stock Exchange, subject to official notice of issuance, under
the symbol TGP. |
13
Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating
Data
The following table presents summary:
|
|
|
|
|
historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain, which
was named Naviera F. Tapias S.A. prior to its
acquisition by Teekay Shipping Corporation through its
subsidiary, Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (or Luxco), on
April 30, 2004; and |
|
|
|
pro forma financial and operating data of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. |
The summary historical financial and operating data has been
prepared on the following basis:
|
|
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain
excludes financial information related to three businesses
previously held in separate subsidiaries and unrelated to the
marine transportation of LNG and crude oil, which were disposed
of prior to Teekay Shipping Corporations acquisition of
Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 and
the four months ended April 30, 2004 are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of Teekay Spain
included elsewhere in this prospectus; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at and for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 are
derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of
Teekay Spain, which are not included in this prospectus; and |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at December 31, 2004 and for the eight months ended
December 31, 2004 reflect the acquisition of Teekay Spain
by Teekay Shipping Corporation and are derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements of Teekay Spain included
elsewhere in this prospectus. |
The unaudited pro forma financial and operating data of Teekay
LNG Partners L.P. give pro forma effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
the contribution by Teekay Shipping Corporation to us of the
capital stock and notes receivable of Luxco; |
|
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporations loans and contributions to
us, which we used, together with existing cash, to repay
indebtedness and settle interest rate swaps as described in
Use of Proceeds; |
|
|
|
|
the completion of this offering; and |
|
|
|
the use of the net proceeds of this offering as described in
Use of Proceeds. |
The pro forma financial data presented as at and for the year
ended December 31, 2004 are derived from our unaudited pro
forma consolidated financial statements. The pro forma income
statement data for the year ended December 31, 2004 assumes
this offering and related transactions occurred on
January 1, 2004. The pro forma balance sheet data assumes
this offering and related transactions occurred at
December 31, 2004. A more complete explanation of the pro
forma data can be found in our unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements included with this prospectus.
14
The following table presents two financial measures, net voyage
revenues and EBITDA, which we use in our business. These
financial measures are not calculated or presented in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (or
GAAP). We explain these measures below and reconcile them
to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated
and presented in accordance with GAAP in
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
Because drydocking expenditures are more extensive in nature
than normal routine maintenance, we capitalize and amortize them
for a given vessel from the completion of a drydocking to the
estimated completion of the next drydocking. For more
information about our accounting treatment of drydocking
expenditures, please read Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Overview Important Financial
and Operational Terms and Concepts Drydocking
and Depreciation and Amortization.
To make the summary historical financial and operating data more
comparable, our historical operating results do not include the
historical results of Luxco for the nine months ended
December 31, 2004. In the nine months ended
December 31, 2004, Luxco had no revenues, expenses or
income, or assets or liabilities, other than:
|
|
|
|
|
$465.7 million of advances (including accrued interest)
from Teekay Shipping Corporation that Luxco used to purchase
Teekay Spain and will be used by Luxco to prepay certain debt of
Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
$9.8 million of net interest expense related to the
advances; |
|
|
|
$44.7 million of unrealized foreign exchange losses related
to the advances, which are Euro-denominated; |
|
|
|
$1.1 million in other expenses; |
|
|
|
$2.2 million in cash and cash equivalents; and |
|
|
|
its ownership interest in Teekay Spain and certain purchase
rights and obligations for Suezmax tankers operated by Teekay
Spain under capital lease arrangements, which it acquired from
Teekay Spain on December 30, 2004. |
We believe the exclusion of the Luxco results make our results
more comparable because Luxcos results and financial
position relate solely to the financing of the acquisition of
Teekay Spain and repayment of Teekay Spain debt by Teekay
Shipping Corporation and do not relate to the historical results
of Teekay Spain. In addition, because the capital stock of Luxco
and the $465.7 million of advances will be contributed to
us upon the closing of this offering, these advances and their
related effects will be eliminated on consolidation, as
reflected in our summary pro forma financial data. For more
information on Luxco, please read the unaudited consolidated
financial statements of Luxco included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Recent
Results
For the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we generated voyage
revenues of $34.8 million, net voyage revenues of
$34.6 million, net income of $41.9 million and net
income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or
EBITDA, of $70.1 million. Our results for the
quarter include foreign exchange gains of $45.0 million
(which are primarily unrealized and relate to our revaluation of
Euro-denominated debt into U.S. Dollars at the end of the
period), interest expense of $25.6 million and interest
income of $6.3 million. The results include operation of
our LNG carrier the Madrid Spirit, which delivered in
December 2004, and exclude operation of the Suezmax tanker the
Granada Spirit, which was transferred to another
subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation in December 2004 and
will be contributed back to us upon the closing of this
offering. Please read Non-GAAP Financial
Measures for explanations of net voyage revenues and
EBITDA and reconciliations of net voyage revenues to voyage
revenues and of EBITDA to net income and net operating cash
flow, and Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Granada Spirit Charter and Purchase
Agreement for information about the
Granada Spirit.
15
The following table should be read together with, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the historical and
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
table should be read together with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except per unit and fleet data) | |
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
52,217 |
|
|
$ |
60,326 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses(1)
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
Vessel operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
10,883 |
|
|
|
12,403 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
|
|
30,617 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,803 |
|
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
|
37,808 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,967 |
|
|
|
5,061 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
7,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
33,957 |
|
|
|
38,650 |
|
|
|
45,628 |
|
|
|
63,540 |
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
53,980 |
|
|
|
80,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
14,238 |
|
|
|
23,169 |
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
29,135 |
|
|
|
42,998 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(15,625 |
) |
|
|
(20,104 |
) |
|
|
(18,109 |
) |
|
|
(34,862 |
) |
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
(40,560 |
) |
|
|
(33,343 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
8,431 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
13,426 |
|
|
|
22,211 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)(3)
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
3,462 |
|
|
|
(44,310 |
) |
|
|
(71,502 |
) |
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
(34,149 |
) |
|
|
(16,139 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,618 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
Other income (loss)(5)
|
|
|
3,615 |
|
|
|
5,327 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
(17,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before change in accounting principle
|
|
|
7,349 |
|
|
|
6,495 |
|
|
|
(113,770 |
) |
|
|
(59,432 |
) |
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
(28,787 |
) |
|
|
(2,334 |
) |
Change in accounting principle(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
7,349 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per unit (basic and diluted)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities
|
|
$ |
24,185 |
|
|
$ |
24,625 |
|
|
$ |
20,141 |
|
|
$ |
22,533 |
|
|
$ |
11,289 |
|
|
$ |
154,203 |
|
|
$ |
21,562 |
|
Restricted cash deposits(8)
|
|
|
29,243 |
|
|
|
70,051 |
|
|
|
106,399 |
|
|
|
398,038 |
|
|
|
385,564 |
|
|
|
435,112 |
|
|
|
435,112 |
|
Vessels and equipment(9)
|
|
|
277,076 |
|
|
|
368,951 |
|
|
|
705,010 |
|
|
|
602,550 |
|
|
|
602,055 |
|
|
|
813,431 |
|
|
|
1,068,916 |
|
Total assets(8)
|
|
|
357,247 |
|
|
|
491,058 |
|
|
|
882,604 |
|
|
|
1,069,081 |
|
|
|
1,021,695 |
|
|
|
1,651,522 |
|
|
|
1,766,764 |
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations(8)(10)
|
|
|
317,710 |
|
|
|
444,865 |
|
|
|
882,027 |
|
|
|
1,129,426 |
|
|
|
1,072,379 |
|
|
|
1,200,499 |
|
|
|
1,059,662 |
|
Total stockholders/partners equity (deficit)
|
|
|
34,673 |
|
|
|
29,849 |
|
|
|
(106,105 |
) |
|
|
(164,809 |
) |
|
|
(144,186 |
) |
|
|
184,650 |
|
|
|
687,451 |
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
19,695 |
|
|
$ |
24,770 |
|
|
$ |
20,418 |
|
|
$ |
18,318 |
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
7,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
31,852 |
|
|
|
176,316 |
|
|
|
(277,616 |
) |
|
|
(25,846 |
) |
|
|
95,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(23,304 |
) |
|
|
(55,695 |
) |
|
|
(199,218 |
) |
|
|
262,766 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
39,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
47,913 |
|
|
$ |
55,234 |
|
|
$ |
54,532 |
|
|
$ |
81,798 |
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
|
$ |
80,025 |
|
|
$ |
118,901 |
|
EBITDA(11)
|
|
|
36,556 |
|
|
|
33,912 |
|
|
|
(81,056 |
) |
|
|
(6,578 |
) |
|
|
36,887 |
|
|
|
24,571 |
|
|
|
47,476 |
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
173,186 |
|
|
|
110,097 |
|
|
|
186,755 |
|
|
|
133,628 |
|
|
|
5,522 |
|
|
|
83,703 |
|
|
|
89,225 |
|
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
4,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
LNG Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Suezmax Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
16
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage,
including any bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and
unloading expenses, canal tolls, agency fees and commissions. |
|
|
(2) |
Vessel operating expenses include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. |
|
|
(3) |
Substantially all of these foreign currency exchange gains and
losses were unrealized and not settled in cash. Under U.S.
accounting guidelines, all foreign currency-denominated monetary
assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, restricted cash, accounts payable,
long-term debt and capital lease obligations, are revalued and
reported based on the prevailing exchange rate at the end of the
period. Our primary source for the foreign currency gains and
losses is our Euro-denominated term loans, which totaled
294.8 million Euros ($372.4 million) at
December 31, 2003 and 325.8 million Euros
($443.7 million) at December 31, 2004. |
|
|
(4) |
We have entered into interest rate swaps to hedge our interest
rate risk from our floating-rate debt used to purchase our LNG
carriers. These interest rate swaps were not designated as
hedges under U.S. accounting guidelines until April 30,
2004. Consequently, the changes in the fair values of these
swaps that occurred during periods prior to April 30, 2004
above have been recorded in earnings as interest rate
swaps gain (loss) for those periods. Had these interest
rate swaps been designated as hedges prior to 2003, any
subsequent changes in fair value would have been recognized in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the
extent the hedge was effective and until the hedged item was
recognized as income. |
|
|
|
(5) |
The $10.9 million other loss in the four months ended
April 30, 2004 primarily resulted from a $11.9 million
loss on the sale of non-shipping assets by Teekay Spain prior to
its April 30, 2004 acquisition by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. The $17.2 million other loss in the
pro forma year ended December 31, 2004 primarily
resulted from the $11.9 million loss on the sale of
non-shipping assets and from a write-down of capitalized loan
costs on a pro forma basis. |
|
|
|
(6) |
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (or
SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, which establishes new
standards for recording derivatives in interim and annual
financial statements. We adopted SFAS 133 on
January 1, 2001. We recognized the fair value of our
derivatives as liabilities of $4.4 million on our
consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2001. This
amount was recorded as a change in accounting principle in our
consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2001. |
|
|
(7) |
Please read Note 5 of our unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus for a
calculation of our pro forma net loss per unit. |
|
|
(8) |
We operate two of our LNG carriers under Spanish tax
lease arrangements. Under these arrangements, we borrow
under term loans and deposit the proceeds into restricted cash
accounts. Concurrently, we enter into capital leases for the
vessels, and the vessels are recorded as assets on our balance
sheet. The restricted cash deposits, plus the interest earned on
the deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the
capital lease arrangements, including our obligations to
purchase the vessels at the end of the lease term. Therefore,
the payments under our capital leases are fully funded through
our restricted cash deposits, and our continuing obligation is
the repayment of the term loans. However, under GAAP we record
both the obligations under the capital leases and the term loans
as liabilities, and both the restricted cash deposits and our
vessels under capital leases as assets. This accounting
treatment has the effect of overstating our assets and
liabilities by the amount of restricted cash deposits relating
to the corresponding capital lease obligations. As at
December 31, 2004, historically and on a pro forma basis,
our total assets and total debt each included
$413.3 million of such amount. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Ship Financing Arrangements. |
|
|
(9) |
Vessels and equipment consist of (a) our vessels, at cost
less accumulated depreciation, (b) vessels under capital
leases, at cost less accumulated depreciation, and
(c) advances on our newbuildings. |
17
|
|
(10) |
Total debt for Teekay Spain as at December 31, 2004
excludes a loan made to it in December 2004 of 82.1 million
Euros ($111.8 million) by Teekay Spains direct parent
company, Teekay Spain, S.L., a subsidiary of Luxco. Teekay Spain
will use these funds to repay debt associated with two of its
LNG carriers. |
|
(11) |
EBITDA is calculated as net income(loss) before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as set forth under
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
EBITDA includes our foreign currency exchange and interest rate
swap gains and losses, substantially all of which were
unrealized, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
Year | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
3,462 |
|
|
$ |
(44,310 |
) |
|
$ |
(71,502 |
) |
|
$ |
18,010 |
|
|
$ |
(34,149 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,139 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,618 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,156 |
) |
|
$ |
(115,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,787 |
) |
|
$ |
21,995 |
|
|
$ |
(34,149 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12) |
Calendar-ship-days are equal to the aggregate number of calendar
days in a period that our vessels operate during that period. |
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Consistent with general practice in the shipping industry, we
use net voyage revenues (defined as voyage revenues less voyage
expenses) as a measure of equating revenues generated from
voyage charters to revenues generated from time charters, which
assists us in making operating decisions about the deployment of
our vessels and their performance. Under time charters the
charterer pays the voyage expenses, whereas under voyage charter
contracts the ship owner pays the voyage expenses. Some voyage
expenses are fixed, and the remainder can be estimated. If we,
as the ship owner, pay the voyage expenses, we typically pass
the approximate amount of these expenses on to our customers by
charging higher rates under the contract or billing the expenses
to them. As a result, although voyage revenues from different
types of contracts may vary, the net revenues after subtracting
voyage expenses, which we call net voyage revenues, are
comparable across the different types of contracts. We
principally use net voyage revenues, a non-GAAP financial
measure, because it provides more meaningful information to us
than voyage revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. Net voyage revenues are also widely used by
investors and analysts in the shipping industry for comparing
financial performance between companies in the shipping industry
to industry averages.
The following table reconciles our net voyage revenues with our
voyage revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
Year | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
52,217 |
|
|
$ |
60,326 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
$ |
34,769 |
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
47,913 |
|
|
$ |
55,234 |
|
|
$ |
54,532 |
|
|
$ |
81,798 |
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
|
$ |
80,025 |
|
|
$ |
34,577 |
|
|
$ |
118,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Provided to reconcile net voyage revenues included under
Recent Results on page 15. |
18
EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by management
and by external users of our financial statements, such as
investors, as discussed below.
|
|
|
|
|
Financial and operating performance. EBITDA allows us to
measure the financial and operating performance of our assets
without regard to financing methods, capital structure or
historical cost basis. For instance, our net income is affected
by whether we finance assets or operations with debt or equity
and by changing interest rates. Likewise, our net income is
affected by how much we pay for an asset and that assets
depreciation or amortization schedule. By reviewing our earnings
before the impact of interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, we, our investors and others can understand the
performance of our assets and operations on a more comparable
basis from period to period and against the performance of other
companies in our industry. |
|
|
|
Liquidity. EBITDA allows us to assess the ability of our
assets to generate cash sufficient to service debt, make
distributions to our unitholders and undertake capital
expenditures. For example, reviewing our earnings before the
impact of non-cash depreciation and amortization charges, and
before the payment of interest on debt we incur, provides us an
understanding of how much cash is available to pay interest. |
EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income,
operating income, cash flow from operating activities or any
other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented in
accordance with GAAP. EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items
that affect net income and operating income, and these measures
may vary among other companies. Therefore, EBITDA as presented
below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of
other companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
Year | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Reconciliation of EBITDA to
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
7,349 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
|
$ |
41,906 |
|
|
$ |
(2,334 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,803 |
|
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
|
10,211 |
|
|
|
37,808 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
14,347 |
|
|
|
16,352 |
|
|
|
12,861 |
|
|
|
26,431 |
|
|
|
12,783 |
|
|
|
27,134 |
|
|
|
19,343 |
|
|
|
11,132 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(1,356 |
) |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
36,556 |
|
|
$ |
33,912 |
|
|
$ |
(81,056 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,578 |
) |
|
$ |
36,887 |
|
|
$ |
24,571 |
|
|
$ |
70,104 |
|
|
$ |
47,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net operating
cash flow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow
|
|
$ |
19,695 |
|
|
$ |
24,470 |
|
|
$ |
20,418 |
|
|
$ |
18,318 |
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
7,381 |
|
|
$ |
15,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
4,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
14,347 |
|
|
|
16,352 |
|
|
|
12,861 |
|
|
|
26,431 |
|
|
|
12,783 |
|
|
|
27,134 |
|
|
|
19,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain(loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
(11,837 |
) |
|
|
3,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in working capital
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
(5,935 |
) |
|
|
(8,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps gain(loss) and change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,984 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) and other, net
|
|
|
(3,196 |
) |
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
(44,156 |
) |
|
|
(72,093 |
) |
|
|
18,059 |
|
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
44,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
36,556 |
|
|
$ |
33,912 |
|
|
$ |
(81,056 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,578 |
) |
|
$ |
36,887 |
|
|
$ |
24,571 |
|
|
$ |
70,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Provided to reconcile EBITDA included under Recent
Results on page 15. |
19
RISK FACTORS
Although many of our business risks are comparable to those a
corporation engaged in a similar business would face, limited
partner interests are inherently different from the capital
stock of a corporation. You should carefully consider the
following risk factors together with all of the other
information included in this prospectus when evaluating an
investment in our common units.
If any of the following risks actually occur, our business,
financial condition or operating results could be materially
adversely affected. In that case, we might not be able to pay
distributions on our common units, the trading price of our
common units could decline, and you could lose all or part of
your investment.
Risks Inherent in Our Business
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable
us to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our common units
following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees
and expenses. |
We may not have sufficient cash available each quarter to pay
the minimum quarterly distribution. The amount of cash we can
distribute on our common units principally depends upon the
amount of cash we generate from our operations, which may
fluctuate based on, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the rates we obtain from our charters; |
|
|
|
the level of our operating costs, such as the cost of crews and
insurance; |
|
|
|
the continued availability of LNG production, liquefaction and
regasification facilities; |
|
|
|
the number of unscheduled off-hire days for our fleet and the
timing of, and number of days required for, scheduled drydocking
of our vessels; |
|
|
|
delays in the delivery of newbuildings and the beginning of
payments under charters relating to those vessels; |
|
|
|
prevailing global and regional economic and political conditions; |
|
|
|
currency exchange rate fluctuations; and |
|
|
|
the effect of governmental regulations and maritime
self-regulatory organization standards on the conduct of our
business. |
The actual amount of cash we will have available for
distribution also will depend on factors such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures we make, including for
maintaining vessels, building new vessels, acquiring existing
vessels and complying with regulations; |
|
|
|
our debt service requirements and restrictions on distributions
contained in our debt instruments; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in our working capital needs; |
|
|
|
our ability to make working capital borrowings, including to pay
distributions to unitholders; and |
|
|
|
the amount of any cash reserves, including reserves for future
capital expenditures and other matters, established by our
general partner in its discretion. |
The amount of cash we generate from our operations may differ
materially from our profit or loss for the period, which will be
affected by non-cash items. As a result of this and the other
factors mentioned above, we may make cash distributions during
periods when we record losses and may not make cash
distributions during periods when we record net income.
20
|
|
|
The assumptions underlying the forecast of cash available
for distribution we include in Cash Available for
Distribution Forecasted Available Cash From
Operating Surplus are inherently uncertain and are subject
to significant business, economic, financial, regulatory and
competitive risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those forecasted. |
The forecast of cash available for distribution set forth in
Cash Available for Distribution Forecasted
Available Cash From Operating Surplus includes our
forecast of operating results and cash flows for the twelve
months ending March 31, 2006. The financial forecast has
been prepared by management and we have not received an opinion
or report on it from our or any other independent auditor. In
addition, our forecast includes a calculation of available cash
from operating surplus. The assumptions underlying the forecast
are inherently uncertain and are subject to significant
business, economic, regulatory and competitive risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those forecasted. If we do not achieve the
forecasted results, we may not be able to pay the full minimum
quarterly distribution or any amount on the common units or
subordinated units, in which event the market price of the
common units may decline materially.
|
|
|
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain
the operating capacity of our fleet, which will reduce our cash
available for distribution. In addition, each quarter our
general partner is required to deduct estimated maintenance
capital expenditures from operating surplus, which may result in
less cash available to unitholders than if actual maintenance
capital expenditures were deducted. |
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain, over
the long term, the operating capacity of our fleet, which we
estimate will average approximately $16.4 million per year
for the useful lives of our existing vessels. These maintenance
capital expenditures include capital expenditures associated
with drydocking a vessel, modifying an existing vessel or
acquiring a new vessel to the extent these expenditures are
incurred to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet. These
expenditures could increase as a result of changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
the cost of labor and materials; |
|
|
|
customer requirements; |
|
|
|
increases in the size of our fleet; |
|
|
|
governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory
organization standards relating to safety, security or the
environment; and |
|
|
|
competitive standards. |
Our significant maintenance capital expenditures will reduce the
amount of cash we have available for distribution to our
unitholders.
In addition, our actual maintenance capital expenditures will
vary significantly from quarter to quarter based on, among other
things, the number of vessels drydocked during that quarter. Our
partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct
estimated, rather than actual, maintenance capital expenditures
from operating surplus each quarter in an effort to reduce
fluctuations in operating surplus. The amount of estimated
maintenance capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus
is subject to review and change by the conflicts committee at
least once a year. In years when estimated maintenance capital
expenditures are higher than actual maintenance capital
expenditures as we expect will be the case in the
years we are not required to make expenditures for mandatory
drydockings the amount of cash available for
distribution to unitholders will be lower than if actual
maintenance capital expenditures were deducted from operating
surplus. If our general partner underestimates the appropriate
level of estimated maintenance capital expenditures, we may have
less cash available for distribution in future periods when
actual capital expenditures begin to exceed our previous
estimates.
21
|
|
|
We will be required to make substantial capital
expenditures to expand the size of our fleet. We generally will
be required to make significant installment payments for
acquisitions of newbuilding vessels prior to their delivery and
generation of revenue. Depending on whether we finance our
expenditures through cash from operations or by issuing debt or
equity securities, our ability to make cash distributions may be
diminished or our financial leverage could increase or our
unitholders could be diluted. |
We intend to make substantial capital expenditures to increase
the size of our fleet, particularly the number of LNG carriers
we own. The total delivered cost of a new LNG carrier is
currently approximately $200 million, although the actual
cost will vary significantly depending on the market price
charged by shipyards, the size of the vessel, governmental
regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards.
We generally will be required to make installment payments on
newbuildings prior to their delivery. We typically must pay 20%
of the purchase price of an LNG carrier upon signing the
purchase contract, even though delivery of the completed vessel
will not occur until much later (approximately three years later
for current orders). If we finance these acquisition costs by
issuing debt or equity securities, we will increase the
aggregate amount of interest or minimum quarterly distributions
we must make prior to generating cash from the operation of the
newbuilding.
We have a commitment to acquire a Suezmax newbuilding tanker
scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2005. We have
borrowed under a temporary financing facility to make total
progress payments of $9.6 million towards the total
$50.0 million purchase price of the Suezmax newbuilding. We
also have agreed to purchase from Teekay Shipping Corporation
all of its interest in three LNG newbuildings and related
long-term, fixed-rate time charters for an estimated
$124.5 million, plus the assumption of approximately
$468.0 million in construction debt financing. This
purchase will take place in connection with the delivery of the
first newbuilding scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2006. We
will finance the $124.5 million either through internally
generated funds, debt or equity financings or, at Teekay
Shipping Corporations election, the issuance to it of our
common units. Please read Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Agreement to Purchase
RasGas II Interest.
In addition, we are obligated to purchase four of our existing
Suezmax tankers upon the termination of the related capital
leases, which will occur at various times from 2007 to 2011,
seven years from the respective commencement dates of the
capital leases. The purchase price will be based on the
unamortized portion of the vessel construction financing costs
for the vessels, which we expect to range from
$39.4 million to $43.5 million per vessel.
We and Teekay Shipping Corporation regularly evaluate and pursue
opportunities to provide the marine transportation requirements
for new or expanding LNG projects. Teekay Shipping Corporation
currently has submitted bids to provide transportation
requirements for several LNG projects and we and Teekay Shipping
Corporation may submit additional bids from time to time. The
award process relating to LNG transportation opportunities
typically involves various stages and takes several months to
complete. The award process for some of the projects upon which
Teekay Shipping Corporation has bid are in advanced stages.
Neither we nor Teekay Shipping Corporation may be awarded
charters relating to any of the projects we are or it is
pursuing. If any LNG project charters are awarded to Teekay
Shipping Corporation, it must offer them to us pursuant to the
terms of the omnibus agreement. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions Omnibus
Agreement. If Teekay Shipping Corporation is awarded
charters for any pending project or for any other project and we
elect to obtain the project pursuant to the omnibus agreement,
or if we bid on and are awarded contracts relating to any LNG
project, we will need to incur significant capital expenditures
to build the LNG carriers needed to fulfill the transportation
requirements.
To fund the remaining portion of these and other capital
expenditures, we will be required to use cash from operations or
incur borrowings or raise capital through the sale of debt or
additional equity securities. Use of cash from operations will
reduce cash available for distributions to unitholders. Our
ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital
markets for future offerings may be limited by our financial
22
condition at the time of any such financing or offering as well
as by adverse market conditions resulting from, among other
things, general economic conditions and contingencies and
uncertainties that are beyond our control. Our failure to obtain
the funds for necessary future capital expenditures could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition and on our ability to make cash
distributions. Even if we are successful in obtaining necessary
funds, the terms of such financings could limit our ability to
pay cash distributions to unitholders. In addition, incurring
additional debt may significantly increase our interest expense
and financial leverage, and issuing additional equity securities
may result in significant unitholder dilution and would increase
the aggregate amount of cash required to meet our minimum
quarterly distribution to unitholders, which could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to make cash
distributions.
|
|
|
Our substantial debt levels may limit our flexibility in
obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business
opportunities. |
Assuming we had completed this offering and the related
transactions on December 31, 2004, our consolidated debt
and capital lease obligations would have been $1.1 billion.
If we are awarded contracts for new LNG projects, our
consolidated debt and capital lease obligations will increase,
perhaps significantly. In addition, we anticipate having the
capacity to borrow $100 million under a revolving credit
facility that we entered into in connection with this offering.
Following this offering, we will continue to have the ability to
incur additional debt, subject to limitations in our credit
facility. Our level of debt could have important consequences to
us, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other
purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available
on favorable terms; |
|
|
|
we will need a substantial portion of our cash flow to make
principal and interest payments on our debt, reducing the funds
that would otherwise be available for operations, future
business opportunities and distributions to unitholders; |
|
|
|
our debt level will make us more vulnerable than our competitors
with less debt to competitive pressures or a downturn in our
business or the economy generally; and |
|
|
|
our debt level may limit our flexibility in responding to
changing business and economic conditions. |
Our ability to service our debt will depend upon, among other
things, our future financial and operating performance, which
will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and
financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which
are beyond our control. If our operating results are not
sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we
will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions,
reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions,
investments or capital expenditures, selling assets,
restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional
equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to
effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all.
|
|
|
We derive a substantial majority of our revenues from
three customers, and the loss of any customer, time charter or
vessel could result in a significant loss of revenues and cash
flow. |
We have derived, and believe that we will continue to derive, a
significant portion of our revenues and cash flow from a limited
number of customers. Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. (or
CEPSA), an international oil company, accounted for
approximately 47% and 36% of our revenues during 2003 and 2004,
respectively. In addition, two other customers, Spanish energy
companies Repsol YPF, S.A. and Gas Natural SDG, S.A.,
accounted for 26% and 11%, respectively, of our revenues in 2003
and 18% and 21%, respectively, of our revenues in 2004.
Together, these three customers accounted for approximately 84%
and 75% of our revenues during 2003 and 2004. No other customer
accounted for 10% or more of our revenues during either of these
years. After the delivery in 2006 and 2007 of the three LNG
newbuildings we have agreed to purchase from Teekay Shipping
Corporation and commencement of payments by
23
RasGas II under the related time charters, we will derive a
significant amount of our revenues from that customer.
We could lose a customer or the benefits of a time charter if:
|
|
|
|
|
the customer fails to make charter payments because of its
financial inability, disagreements with us or otherwise; |
|
|
|
the customer exercises certain rights to terminate the charter,
purchase or cause the sale of the vessel or, under some of our
charters, convert the time charter to a bareboat charter (some
of which rights are exercisable at any time); |
|
|
|
the customer terminates the charter because we fail to deliver
the vessel within a fixed period of time, the vessel is lost or
damaged beyond repair, there are serious deficiencies in the
vessel or prolonged periods of off-hire, or we default under the
charter; or |
|
|
|
under some of our time charters, the customer terminates the
charter because of the termination of the charterers LNG
sales agreement supplying the LNG designated for our services,
or a prolonged force majeure event affecting the customer,
including damage to or destruction of relevant LNG production or
regasification facilities, war or political unrest preventing us
from performing services for that customer. |
Please read Business LNG Time
Charters Purchase Options, Termination Rights and
Bareboat Conversion Options and Business
Crude Oil Time Charters CEPSAs Right to
Terminate.
If we lose a key LNG time charter, we may be unable to re-deploy
the related vessel on terms as favorable to us due to the
long-term nature of most LNG time charters and the lack of an
established LNG spot market. If we are unable to re-deploy an
LNG carrier, we will not receive any revenues from that vessel,
but we may be required to pay expenses necessary to maintain the
vessel in proper operating condition. In addition, if a customer
exercises its right to purchase a vessel, we would not receive
any further revenue from the vessel and may be unable to obtain
a substitute vessel and charter. This may cause us to receive
decreased revenue and cash flows from having fewer vessels
operating in our fleet. Any compensation under our charters for
a purchase of the vessels may not adequately compensate us for
the loss of the vessel and related time charter.
If we lose a key Suezmax tanker customer, we may be unable to
obtain other long-term Suezmax charters and may become subject
to the volatile spot market, which is highly competitive and
subject to significant price fluctuations. If a customer
exercises its right under some charters to purchase or force a
sale of the vessel, we may be unable to acquire an adequate
replacement vessel or may be forced to construct a new vessel.
Any replacement newbuilding would not generate revenues during
its construction and we may be unable to charter any replacement
vessel on terms as favorable to us as those of the terminated
charter.
The loss of any of our customers, time charters or vessels, or a
decline in payments under our charters, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
|
|
|
We depend on Teekay Shipping Corporation to assist us in
operating our business, competing in our markets, and providing
interim financing for three new LNG carriers. |
Pursuant to certain services agreements between us and certain
of our operating subsidiaries, on the one hand, and certain
subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation, on the other hand,
the Teekay Shipping Corporation subsidiaries will provide to us
administrative services and to our operating subsidiaries
significant operational services (including vessel maintenance,
crewing for some of our vessels, purchasing, shipyard
supervision, insurance and financial services) and other
technical, advisory and administrative services. Our operational
success and ability to execute our growth strategy will depend
significantly upon Teekay Shipping Corporations
satisfactory performance of these services. Our business
24
will be harmed if Teekay Shipping Corporation fails to perform
these services satisfactorily or if Teekay Shipping Corporation
stops providing these services to us.
Our ability to compete for the transportation requirements of
LNG projects and to enter into new time charters and expand our
customer relationships will depend largely on our ability to
leverage our relationship with Teekay Shipping Corporation and
its reputation and relationships in the shipping industry. If
Teekay Shipping Corporation suffers material damage to its
reputation or relationships, it may harm our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
renew existing charters upon their expiration; |
|
|
|
obtain new charters; |
|
|
|
successfully interact with shipyards during periods of shipyard
construction constraints; |
|
|
|
obtain financing on commercially acceptable terms; or |
|
|
|
maintain satisfactory relationships with our employees and
suppliers. |
If our ability to do any of the things described above is
impaired, it could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition and our
ability to make cash distributions.
Teekay Shipping Corporation is also incurring all costs for the
construction and delivery of the three RasGas II LNG
newbuildings, which we refer to as warehousing. Upon
their delivery, we will purchase all of the interest of Teekay
Shipping Corporation in the vessels at a price that will
reimburse Teekay Shipping Corporation for these costs and
compensate it for its average weighted cost of capital on the
construction payments. We may enter into similar arrangements
with Teekay Shipping Corporation in the future. If Teekay
Shipping Corporation fails to make construction payments for the
RasGas II newbuildings or other vessels that Teekay
Shipping Corporation warehouses for us, we could lose access to
the vessels as a result of the default or we may need to finance
these vessels before they begin operating and generating voyage
revenues, which could harm our business and reduce our ability
to make cash distributions.
|
|
|
Our growth depends on continued growth in demand for LNG
and LNG shipping. |
Our growth strategy focuses on expansion in the LNG shipping
sector. Accordingly, our growth depends on continued growth in
world and regional demand for LNG and LNG shipping, which could
be negatively affected by a number of factors, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
increases in the cost of natural gas derived from LNG relative
to the cost of natural gas generally; |
|
|
|
increases in the production of natural gas in areas linked by
pipelines to consuming areas, the extension of existing, or the
development of new, pipeline systems in markets we may serve, or
the conversion of existing non-natural gas pipelines to natural
gas pipelines in those markets; |
|
|
|
decreases in the consumption of natural gas due to increases in
its price relative to other energy sources or other factors
making consumption of natural gas less attractive; |
|
|
|
availability of new, alternative energy sources, including
compressed natural gas; and |
|
|
|
negative global or regional economic or political conditions,
particularly in LNG consuming regions, which could reduce energy
consumption or its growth. |
Reduced demand for LNG and LNG shipping would have a material
adverse effect on our future growth and could harm our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
25
|
|
|
Growth of the LNG market may be limited by infrastructure
constraints and community and environmental group resistance to
new LNG infrastructure over concerns about the environment,
safety and terrorism. |
A complete LNG project includes production, liquefaction,
regasification, storage and distribution facilities and LNG
carriers. Existing LNG projects and infrastructure are limited,
and new or expanded LNG projects are highly complex and
capital-intensive, with new projects often costing several
billion dollars. Many factors could negatively affect continued
development of LNG infrastructure or disrupt the supply of LNG,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
increases in interest rates or other events that may affect the
availability of sufficient financing for LNG projects on
commercially reasonable terms; |
|
|
|
decreases in the price of LNG, which might decrease the expected
returns relating to investments in LNG projects; |
|
|
|
the inability of project owners or operators to obtain
governmental approvals to construct or operate LNG facilities; |
|
|
|
local community resistance to proposed or existing LNG
facilities based on safety, environmental or security concerns; |
|
|
|
any significant explosion, spill or similar incident involving
an LNG facility or LNG carrier; |
|
|
|
labor or political unrest affecting existing or proposed areas
of LNG production; and |
|
|
|
capacity constraints at existing shipyards, which are expected
to continue until at least the end of 2007. |
We expect that as a result of the factors discussed above, some
of the proposals to expand existing or develop new LNG
liquefaction and regasification facilities will be abandoned or
significantly delayed. For example, until recently Bolivia had
suspended its LNG export program because of political unrest,
and an LNG project in Peru has been delayed by problems in
arranging financing.
Explosions at an LNG plant in Algeria in January and August 2004
have also increased public concern about the safety of LNG
facilities. In addition, the proposed construction of new LNG
import terminals in some locations in North America has met with
significant community and environmental group resistance over
concerns about the environment, safety and terrorism.
If the LNG supply chain is disrupted or does not continue to
grow, or if a significant LNG explosion, spill or similar
incident occurs, it could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition and our
ability to make cash distributions.
|
|
|
Our growth depends on our ability to expand relationships
with existing customers and obtain new customers, for which we
will face substantial competition. |
One of our principal objectives is to enter into additional
long-term, fixed-rate LNG time charters. The process of
obtaining new long-term LNG time charters is highly competitive
and generally involves an intensive screening process and
competitive bids, and often extends for several months. LNG
shipping contracts are awarded based upon a variety of factors
relating to the vessel operator, including:
|
|
|
|
|
shipping industry relationships and reputation for customer
service and safety; |
|
|
|
LNG shipping experience and quality of ship operations
(including cost effectiveness); |
|
|
|
quality and experience of seafaring crew; |
|
|
|
the ability to finance LNG carriers at competitive rates and
financial stability generally; |
|
|
|
relationships with shipyards and the ability to get suitable
berths; |
26
|
|
|
|
|
construction management experience, including the ability to
obtain on-time delivery of new vessels according to customer
specifications; |
|
|
|
willingness to accept operational risks pursuant to the charter,
such as allowing termination of the charter for force majeure
events; and |
|
|
|
competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price. |
We expect substantial competition for providing marine
transportation services for potential LNG projects from a number
of experienced companies, including state-sponsored entities and
major energy companies affiliated with the LNG project requiring
LNG shipping services. Many of these competitors have
significantly greater financial resources than do we or Teekay
Shipping Corporation. We anticipate that an increasing number of
marine transportation companies including many with
strong reputations and extensive resources and
experience will enter the LNG transportation sector.
This increased competition may cause greater price competition
for time charters. As a result of these factors, we may be
unable to expand our relationships with existing customers or to
obtain new customers on a profitable basis, if at all, which
would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash
distributions.
|
|
|
Delays in deliveries of newbuildings could harm our
operating results and lead to the termination of related time
charters. |
We are scheduled to take delivery of a newbuilding Suezmax
tanker in the third quarter of 2005, and we have agreed to
purchase all the interest of Teekay Shipping Corporation in the
three RasGas II vessels in connection with their deliveries
scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first half of
2007. The delivery of these vessels, or any other newbuildings
we may order, could be delayed, which would delay our receipt of
revenues under the time charters for the vessels. In addition,
under some of our charters if our delivery of a vessel to our
customer is delayed, we may be required to pay liquidated
damages in amounts equal to or, under some charters, almost
double, the hire rate during the delay. For prolonged delays,
the customer may terminate the time charter and, in addition to
the resulting loss of revenues, we may be responsible for
additional, substantial liquidated damages.
Our receipt of newbuildings could be delayed because of:
|
|
|
|
|
quality or engineering problems; |
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory
organization standards; |
|
|
|
work stoppages or other labor disturbances at the shipyard; |
|
|
|
bankruptcy or other financial crisis of the shipbuilder; |
|
|
|
a backlog of orders at the shipyard; |
|
|
|
political or economic disturbances in South Korea or Spain,
where the vessels are being built; |
|
|
|
weather interference or catastrophic event, such as a major
earthquake or fire; |
|
|
|
our requests for changes to the original vessel specifications; |
|
|
|
shortages of or delays in the receipt of necessary construction
materials, such as steel; |
|
|
|
our inability to finance the purchase of the vessels; or |
|
|
|
our inability to obtain requisite permits or approvals. |
If delivery of a vessel is materially delayed, it could
adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
27
|
|
|
We may have more difficulty entering into long-term,
fixed-rate time charters if an active short-term or spot LNG
shipping market develops. |
LNG shipping historically has been transacted with long-term,
fixed-rate time charters, usually with terms ranging from 20 to
25 years. One of our principal strategies is to enter into
additional long-term, fixed-rate LNG time charters. However, the
number of spot and short-term charters has been increasing, with
LNG charters under 12 months in duration growing from less
than 2% of the market in the late 1990s to almost 11% in 2003.
For example, substantially all LNG shipped into the Lake
Charles, Louisiana terminal in 2004 was shipped under short-term
charters. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that spot and
short-term charters could account for 15% to 20% of global LNG
shipping imports by 2013, with short-term charters occurring
primarily in the Atlantic region.
If an active spot or short-term market continues to develop, we
may have increased difficulty entering into long-term,
fixed-rate time charters for our LNG vessels and, as a result,
our cash flow may decrease and be less stable. In addition, an
active short-term or spot LNG market may require us to enter
into charters based on changing market prices, as opposed to
contracts based on a fixed rate, which could result in a
decrease in our cash flow in periods when the market price for
shipping LNG is depressed or insufficient funds are available to
cover our financing costs for related vessels.
|
|
|
Over time, vessel values may fluctuate substantially and,
if these values are lower at a time when we are attempting to
dispose of a vessel, we may incur a loss. |
Vessel values for LNG carriers and Suezmax oil tankers can
fluctuate substantially over time due to a number of different
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
prevailing economic conditions in natural gas, oil and energy
markets; |
|
|
|
a substantial or extended decline in demand for natural gas, LNG
or oil; |
|
|
|
increases in the supply of vessel capacity; and |
|
|
|
the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing vessels, as a
result of technological advances in vessel design or equipment,
changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or
standards, or otherwise. |
If a charter terminates, we may be unable to re-deploy the
vessel at attractive rates and, rather than continue to incur
costs to maintain and finance it, may seek to dispose of it. Our
inability to dispose of the vessel at a reasonable value could
result in a loss on its sale and adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
We may be unable to make or realize expected benefits from
acquisitions, and implementing our growth strategy through
acquisitions may harm our business, financial condition and
operating results. |
Our growth strategy includes selectively acquiring existing LNG
carriers or LNG shipping businesses. Historically, there have
been very few purchases of existing vessels and businesses in
the LNG shipping industry. Factors that may contribute to a
limited number of acquisition opportunities in the LNG industry
in the near term include the relatively small number of
independent LNG fleet owners and the limited number of LNG
carriers not subject to existing long-term charter contracts. In
addition, competition from other companies could reduce our
acquisition opportunities or cause us to pay higher prices.
Any acquisition of a vessel or business may not be profitable to
us at or after the time we acquire it and may not generate cash
flow sufficient to justify our investment. In addition, our
acquisition growth strategy exposes us to risks that may harm
our business, financial condition and operating results,
including risks that we may:
|
|
|
|
|
fail to realize anticipated benefits, such as new customer
relationships, cost-savings or cash flow enhancements; |
28
|
|
|
|
|
be unable to hire, train or retain qualified shore and seafaring
personnel to manage and operate our growing business and fleet; |
|
|
|
decrease our liquidity by using a significant portion of our
available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions; |
|
|
|
significantly increase our interest expense or financial
leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions; |
|
|
|
incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs
associated with the business or vessels acquired; or |
|
|
|
incur other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill
or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring
charges. |
Unlike newbuildings, existing vessels typically do not carry
warranties as to their condition. While we generally inspect
existing vessels prior to purchase, such an inspection would
normally not provide us with as much knowledge of a
vessels condition as we would possess if it had been built
for us and operated by us during its life. Repairs and
maintenance costs for existing vessels are difficult to predict
and may be substantially higher than for vessels we have
operated since they were built. These costs could decrease our
cash flow and reduce our liquidity.
|
|
|
Terrorist attacks, increased hostilities or war could lead
to further economic instability, increased costs and disruption
of our business. |
Terrorist attacks, such as the attacks that occurred in the
United States on September 11, 2001 and the bombings in
Spain on March 11, 2004, and the current conflicts in Iraq
and Afghanistan and other current and future conflicts, may
adversely affect our business, operating results, financial
condition, ability to raise capital and future growth.
Continuing hostilities in the Middle East may lead to additional
armed conflicts or to further acts of terrorism and civil
disturbance in the United States, Spain or elsewhere, which may
contribute further to economic instability and disruption of LNG
and oil production and distribution, which could result in
reduced demand for our services.
In addition, LNG and oil facilities, shipyards, vessels,
pipelines and oil and gas fields could be targets of future
terrorist attacks. Any such attacks could lead to, among other
things, bodily injury or loss of life, vessel or other property
damage, increased vessel operational costs, including insurance
costs, and the inability to transport LNG, natural gas and oil
to or from certain locations. Terrorist attacks, war or other
events beyond our control that adversely affect the
distribution, production or transportation of LNG or oil to be
shipped by us could entitle our customers to terminate our
charter contracts, which would harm our cash flow and our
business.
Terrorist attacks, or the perception that LNG facilities
and LNG carriers are potential terrorist targets, could
materially and adversely affect expansion of
LNG infrastructure and the continued supply of LNG to the
United States and other countries. Concern that
LNG facilities may be targeted for attack by terrorists has
contributed to significant community and environmental
resistance to the construction of a number of
LNG facilities, primarily in North America. If a terrorist
incident involving an LNG facility or LNG carrier did
occur, in addition to the possible effects identified in the
previous paragraph, the incident may adversely affect
construction of additional LNG facilities in the United
States and other countries or the temporary or permanent closing
of various LNG facilities currently in operation.
|
|
|
Our substantial operations outside the United States
expose us to political, governmental and economic instability,
which could harm our operations. |
Because our operations are primarily conducted outside of the
United States, they may be affected by economic, political and
governmental conditions in the countries where we are engaged in
business or where our vessels are registered. Any disruption
caused by these factors could harm our business. In particular,
we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from shipping
LNG and oil from politically
29
unstable regions. Past political conflicts in these regions,
particularly in the Arabian Gulf, have included attacks on
ships, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt shipping
in the area. In addition to acts of terrorism, vessels trading
in this and other regions have also been subject, in limited
instances, to piracy. Future hostilities or other political
instability in the Arabian Gulf or other regions where we
operate or may operate could have a material adverse effect on
the growth of our business, results of operations and financial
condition and our ability to make cash distributions. For
example, in 2001 Indonesian insurgents forced a four-month
shutdown of ExxonMobils ARCO LNG liquefaction plant and in
March 2004 tugboat workers conducted a two-day strike that shut
down operations at Trinidad and Tobagos liquefaction
facilities. In addition, tariffs, trade embargoes and other
economic sanctions by Spain, the United States or other
countries against countries in the Middle East, Southeast Asia
or elsewhere as a result of terrorist attacks, hostilities or
otherwise may limit trading activities with those countries,
which could also harm our business and ability to make cash
distributions.
|
|
|
Marine transportation is inherently risky, and an incident
involving significant loss of or environmental contamination by
any of our vessels could harm our reputation and
business. |
Our vessels and their cargoes are at risk of being damaged or
lost because of events such as:
|
|
|
|
|
marine disasters; |
|
|
|
bad weather; |
|
|
|
mechanical failures; |
|
|
|
grounding, fire, explosions and collisions; |
|
|
|
piracy; |
|
|
|
human error; and |
|
|
|
war and terrorism. |
An accident involving any of our vessels could result in any of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
death or injury to persons, loss of property or environmental
damage; |
|
|
|
delays in the delivery of cargo; |
|
|
|
loss of revenues from or termination of charter contracts; |
|
|
|
governmental fines, penalties or restrictions on conducting
business; |
|
|
|
higher insurance rates; and |
|
|
|
damage to our reputation and customer relationships generally. |
Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and operating results.
|
|
|
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may
occur to our property or result from our operations. |
The operation of LNG carriers and oil tankers is inherently
risky. Although we carry protection and indemnity insurance, all
risks may not be adequately insured against, and any particular
claim may not be paid. In addition, we do not carry insurance on
our Suezmax tankers covering the loss of revenues resulting from
vessel off-hire time based on its cost compared to our off-hire
experience. In the future, we may not continue to maintain
off-hire insurance for our LNG carriers. Any claims covered by
insurance would be subject to deductibles, and since it is
possible that a large number of claims may be brought, the
aggregate amount of these deductibles could be material. Certain
of our insurance coverage is maintained through mutual
protection and indemnity associations, and as a member of such
associations we may be
30
required to make additional payments over and above budgeted
premiums if member claims exceed association reserves.
We may be unable to procure adequate insurance coverage at
commercially reasonable rates in the future. For example, more
stringent environmental regulations have led in the past to
increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of
availability of, insurance against risks of environmental damage
or pollution. A catastrophic oil spill or marine disaster could
exceed our insurance coverage, which could harm our business,
financial condition and operating results. Any uninsured or
underinsured loss could harm our business and financial
condition. In addition, our insurance may be voidable by the
insurers as a result of certain of our actions, such as our
ships failing to maintain certification with applicable maritime
self-regulatory organizations.
Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist
attacks may also make certain types of insurance more difficult
for us to obtain. In addition, the insurance that may be
available to us may be significantly more expensive than our
existing coverage.
|
|
|
The marine energy transportation industry is subject to
substantial environmental and other regulations, which may
significantly limit our operations or increase our
expenses. |
Our operations are affected by extensive and changing
environmental protection laws and other regulations and
international conventions. We have incurred, and expect to
continue to incur, substantial expenses in complying with these
laws and regulations, including expenses for vessel
modifications and changes in operating procedures. Additional
laws and regulations may be adopted that could limit our ability
to do business or further increase our costs, which could harm
our business. In addition, failure to comply with applicable
laws and regulations may result in administrative and civil
penalties, criminal sanctions or the suspension or termination
of our operations.
The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (or
OPA 90), for instance, increased expenses for us and
others in our industry. OPA 90 provides for potentially
unlimited joint, several, and strict liability for owners,
operators and demise or bareboat charterers for oil pollution
and related damages in U.S. waters, which include the
U.S. territorial sea and the 200-nautical mile exclusive
economic zone around the United States. OPA 90 applies to
discharges of any oil from a vessel, including discharges of oil
tanker cargoes and discharges of fuel and lubricants from an oil
tanker or LNG carrier. To comply with OPA 90, vessel owners
generally incur increased costs in meeting additional
maintenance and inspection requirements, in developing
contingency arrangements for potential spills and in obtaining
required insurance coverage. OPA 90 contains financial
responsibility requirements for vessels operating in
U.S. waters and requires vessel owners and operators to
establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of
insurance or of qualification as a self-insurer or other
acceptable evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to
meet certain potential liabilities under OPA 90 and the
U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (or CERCLA), which imposes similar
liabilities upon owners, operators and bareboat charterers of
vessels from which a discharge of hazardous
substances (other than oil) occurs. While LNG should not
be considered a hazardous substance under CERCLA, additives to
fuel oil or lubricants used on LNG carriers might fall within
its scope. Under OPA 90 and CERCLA, owners, operators and
bareboat charterers are jointly and severally strictly liable
for costs of cleanup and damages resulting from a discharge or
threatened discharge within U.S. waters. This means we may be
subject to liability even if we are not negligent or at fault.
Most states in the United States bordering on a navigable
waterway have enacted legislation providing for potentially
unlimited strict liability without regard to fault for the
discharge of pollutants within their waters. An oil spill or
other event could result in significant liability, including
fines, penalties, criminal liability and costs for natural
resource damages. The potential for these releases could
increase to the extent we increase our operations in
U.S. waters.
OPA 90 and CERCLA do not preclude claimants from seeking
damages for the discharge of oil and hazardous substances under
other applicable law, including maritime tort law. Such claims
could include
31
attempts to characterize seaborne transportation of LNG as an
ultra-hazardous activity, which attempts, if successful, would
lead to our being strictly liable for damages resulting from
that activity.
In addition, we believe that the heightened environmental,
quality and security concerns of insurance underwriters,
regulators and charterers will generally lead to additional
regulatory requirements, including enhanced risk assessment and
security requirements and greater inspection and safety
requirements on all vessels in the LNG carrier and oil tanker
markets.
|
|
|
Exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations will
result in fluctuations in our cash flows and operating
results. |
We are paid in Euros under some of our charters, and a
substantial majority of our vessel operating expenses and
general and administrative expenses are denominated in Euros,
which is primarily a function of the nationality of our crew and
administrative staff. We also make payments under two
Euro-denominated term loans. If the amount of our
Euro-denominated obligations exceeds our Euro-denominated
revenues, we must convert other currencies, primarily the
U.S. Dollar, into Euros. An increase in the strength of the
Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar would require us to
convert more U.S. Dollars to Euros to satisfy those
obligations, which would cause us to have less cash available
for distribution. In addition, if we do not have sufficient U.S.
Dollars, we may be required to convert Euros into
U.S. Dollars for distributions to unitholders. An increase
in the strength of the U.S. Dollar relative to the Euro could
cause us to have less cash available for distribution in this
circumstance. We have not entered into currency swaps or forward
contracts or similar derivatives to mitigate this risk.
Because we report our operating results in U.S. Dollars, changes
in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to the Euro also
result in fluctuations in our reported revenues and earnings. In
addition, under U.S. accounting guidelines, all foreign
currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities such as
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, restricted cash,
accounts payable, long-term debt and capital lease obligations
are revalued and reported based on the prevailing exchange rate
at the end of the period. This revaluation causes us to report
significant non-monetary foreign currency exchange gains and
losses each period. The primary source for these gains and
losses is our Euro-denominated term loans. In 2002, 2003 and
2004, we reported foreign currency exchange losses of
$44.3 million, $71.5 million and $16.1 million,
respectively.
|
|
|
Our limited experience in LNG shipping could affect our
ability to operate profitably and grow. |
We have limited experience providing LNG marine transportation
services. Teekay Spain began owning and operating LNG carriers
in 2002 and, prior to its acquisition of Teekay Spain in 2004,
Teekay Shipping Corporation did not own LNG carriers and only
provided limited services related to marine transportation of
LNG. Our and Teekay Shipping Corporations lack of
significant experience in LNG shipping could affect our ability
to operate our business profitably, to expand relationships with
existing customers and to obtain new customers. Our failure to
achieve any of these objectives could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
|
|
|
We have no history operating as a separate publicly traded
entity and will incur increased costs as a result of being a
publicly traded limited partnership. |
We have no history operating as a separate publicly traded
entity. As a publicly traded limited partnership, we will be
required to comply with the SECs reporting requirements
and with corporate governance and related requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the SEC and the securities exchange on which
our common units will be listed. We will incur significant
legal, accounting and other expenses in complying with these and
other applicable regulations. We anticipate that our incremental
general and administrative expenses as a publicly traded limited
partnership will be approximately $1.0 million annually,
and will include costs associated with annual reports to
unitholders, tax return and Schedule K-1
32
preparation and distribution, investor relations, registrar and
transfer agents fees, incremental director and officer
liability insurance costs and director compensation.
|
|
|
Many of our seafaring employees are covered by collective
bargaining agreements and the failure to renew those agreements
or any future labor agreements may disrupt our operations and
adversely affect our cash flows. |
A significant portion of our seafarers, and the seafarers
employed by Teekay Shipping Corporation and its other affiliates
that crew our vessels, are employed under collective bargaining
agreements, which expire at varying times through 2008. The
collective bargaining agreement for our Spanish Suezmax tanker
crew members (covering four Suezmax tankers) expires at the end
of 2005. We may be subject to similar labor agreements in the
future. We may be subject to labor disruptions in the future if
our relationships deteriorate with our seafarers or the unions
that represent them. Our collective bargaining agreements may
not prevent labor disruptions, particularly when the agreements
are being renegotiated. Any labor disruptions could harm our
operations and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition and our
ability to make cash distributions.
|
|
|
Due to our lack of diversification, adverse developments
in our LNG or oil marine transportation business could reduce
our ability to make distributions to our unitholders. |
We rely exclusively on the cash flow generated from our LNG
carriers and Suezmax oil tankers that operate in the LNG and oil
marine transportation business. Due to our lack of
diversification, an adverse development in the LNG or oil
shipping industry would have a significantly greater impact on
our financial condition and results of operations than if we
maintained more diverse assets or lines of business.
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
Teekay Shipping Corporation
and its affiliates may engage in competition with us.
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates may engage in
competition with us. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Teekay
Shipping Corporation and its controlled affiliates (other than
us and our subsidiaries) generally will agree not to own,
operate or charter LNG carriers without the consent of our
general partner. The omnibus agreement, however, allows Teekay
Shipping Corporation or any of such controlled affiliates to:
|
|
|
|
|
acquire LNG carriers and related time charters as part of a
business if a majority of the value of the total assets or
business acquired is not attributable to the LNG carriers and
time charters, as determined in good faith by the board of
directors of Teekay Shipping Corporation; however, if at any
time Teekay Shipping Corporation completes such an acquisition,
it must offer to sell the LNG carriers and related time charters
to us for their fair market value plus any additional tax or
other similar costs to Teekay Shipping Corporation that would be
required to transfer the LNG carriers and time charters to us
separately from the acquired business; or |
|
|
|
own, operate and charter LNG carriers that relate to a bid or
award for a proposed LNG project that Teekay Shipping
Corporation or any of its subsidiaries has submitted or
hereafter submits or receives; however, at least 180 days
prior to the scheduled delivery date of any such LNG carrier,
Teekay Shipping Corporation must offer to sell the LNG carrier
and related time charter to us, with the vessel valued at its
fully-built-up cost, which represents the aggregate
expenditures incurred (or to be incurred prior to delivery to
us) by Teekay Shipping Corporation to acquire or construct and
bring such LNG carrier to the condition and location necessary
for our intended use. |
If we decline the offer to purchase the LNG carriers and time
charters described above, Teekay Shipping Corporation may own
and operate the LNG carriers, but may not expand that portion of
its business.
33
In addition, pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Teekay Shipping
Corporation or any of its controlled affiliates (other than us
and our subsidiaries) may:
|
|
|
|
|
acquire, operate or charter LNG carriers if our general partner
has previously advised Teekay Shipping Corporation that the
board of directors of our general partner has elected, with the
approval of its conflicts committee, not to cause us or our
subsidiaries to acquire or operate the carriers; |
|
|
|
own and operate the three RasGas II LNG newbuilding carriers and
related time charters if we fail to perform our obligation to
purchase such vessels under our agreement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation (please see Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Agreement to Purchase RasGas II
Interest); |
|
|
|
acquire up to a 9.9% equity ownership, voting or profit
participation interest in any publicly traded company that owns
or operates LNG carriers; and |
|
|
|
provide ship management services relating to LNG carriers. |
If there is a change of control of Teekay Shipping Corporation,
the non-competition provisions of the omnibus agreement may
terminate, which termination could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition and our ability to make cash distributions. Please
read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Omnibus Agreement.
|
|
|
Our general partner and its other affiliates have
conflicts of interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may
permit them to favor their own interests to your
detriment. |
Following this offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation will
indirectly own the 2% general partner interest and a 78% limited
partner interest in us and will own and control our general
partner. Conflicts of interest may arise between Teekay Shipping
Corporation and its affiliates, including our general partner,
on the one hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand.
As a result of these conflicts, our general partner may favor
its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over the
interests of our unitholders. These conflicts include, among
others, the following situations:
|
|
|
|
|
neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement
requires our general partner or Teekay Shipping Corporation to
pursue a business strategy that favors us or utilizes our
assets, and Teekay Shipping Corporations officers and
directors have a fiduciary duty to make decisions in the best
interests of the stockholders of Teekay Shipping Corporation,
which may be contrary to our interests; |
|
|
|
the executive officers and three of the directors of our general
partner also serve as executive officers or directors of Teekay
Shipping Corporation and another director of our general partner
is employed by an affiliate of Teekay Shipping Corporation; |
|
|
|
our general partner is allowed to take into account the
interests of parties other than us, such as Teekay Shipping
Corporation, in resolving conflicts of interest, which has the
effect of limiting its fiduciary duty to our unitholders; |
|
|
|
our general partner has limited its liability and reduced its
fiduciary duties under the laws of the Marshall Islands, while
also restricting the remedies available to our unitholders, and
as a result of purchasing common units, unitholders are treated
as having agreed to the modified standard of fiduciary duties
and to certain actions that may be taken by our general partner,
all as set forth in the partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
our general partner determines the amount and timing of asset
purchases and sales, capital expenditures, borrowings, issuances
of additional partnership securities and reserves, each of which
can affect the amount of cash that is available for distribution
to our unitholders; |
|
|
|
in some instances, our general partner may cause us to borrow
funds in order to permit the payment of cash distributions, even
if the purpose or effect of the borrowing is to make a |
34
|
|
|
|
|
distribution on the subordinated units or to make incentive
distributions or to accelerate the expiration of the
subordination period; |
|
|
|
our general partner determines which costs incurred by it and
its affiliates are reimbursable by us; |
|
|
|
our partnership agreement does not restrict our general partner
from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services
rendered to us on terms that are fair and reasonable or entering
into additional contractual arrangements with any of these
entities on our behalf; |
|
|
|
our general partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed
to us by it and its affiliates; and |
|
|
|
our general partner decides whether to retain separate counsel,
accountants or others to perform services for us. |
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Omnibus Agreement,
Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties and
The Partnership Agreement.
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement limits our general
partners fiduciary duties to our unitholders and restricts
the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our
general partner. |
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the
standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held
by Marshall Islands law. For example, our partnership agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its
individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our
general partner. Where our partnership agreement permits, our
general partner may consider only the interests and factors that
it desires, and in such cases it has no duty or obligation to
give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting
us, our affiliates or any limited partner; |
|
|
|
provides that our general partner is entitled to make other
decisions in good faith if it reasonably believes
that the decision is in our best interests; |
|
|
|
generally provides that affiliated transactions and resolutions
of conflicts of interest not approved by the conflicts committee
of the board of directors of our general partner and not
involving a vote of unitholders must be on terms no less
favorable to us than those generally being provided to or
available from unrelated third parties or be fair and
reasonable to us and that, in determining whether a
transaction or resolution is fair and reasonable,
our general partner may consider the totality of the
relationships between the parties involved, including other
transactions that may be particularly advantageous or beneficial
to us; and |
|
|
|
provides that our general partner and its officers and directors
will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our limited
partners or assignees for any acts or omissions unless there has
been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of
competent jurisdiction determining that the general partner or
those other persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud,
willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
In order to become a limited partner of our partnership, a
common unitholder is required to agree to be bound by the
provisions in the partnership agreement, including the
provisions discussed above. Please read Conflicts of
Interest and Fiduciary Duties Fiduciary Duties.
|
|
|
Fees and cost reimbursements, which our general partner
will determine for services provided to us and certain of our
subsidiaries, will be substantial and will reduce our cash
available for distribution to you. |
Prior to making any distribution on the common units, we will
pay fees for services provided to us and certain of our
subsidiaries by certain subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping
Corporation, and we will reimburse our general partner for all
expenses it incurs on our behalf. These fees will be negotiated
on our behalf by our general partner, and our general partner
will also determine the amounts it is reimbursed. These fees and
expenses will include all costs incurred in providing certain
advisory, ship management, technical and administrative services
to us and certain of our subsidiaries, including services
rendered to us pursuant to
35
the agreements described below under Certain Relationships
and Related Party Transactions Advisory and
Administrative Services Agreements. In addition, our
general partner and its affiliates may provide us with other
services for which the general partner or its affiliates may
charge us fees, and we may pay Teekay Shipping Corporation
incentive fees pursuant to the omnibus agreement
with it to reward and motivate Teekay Shipping Corporation for
pursuing LNG projects that we may elect to undertake. Please
read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions and Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary
Duties Conflicts of Interest. The payment of
fees to Teekay Shipping Corporation and its subsidiaries and
reimbursement of expenses to our general partner could adversely
affect our ability to pay cash distributions to you.
|
|
|
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot remove
our general partner without its consent. |
Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders
have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our
business and, therefore, limited ability to influence
managements decisions regarding our business. Unitholders
did not elect our general partner or its board of directors and
will have no right to elect our general partner or its board of
directors on an annual or other continuing basis. The board of
directors of our general partner is chosen by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. Furthermore, if the unitholders are dissatisfied
with the performance of our general partner, they will have
little ability to remove our general partner. As a result of
these limitations, the price at which the common units will
trade could be diminished because of the absence or reduction of
a takeover premium in the trading price.
The unitholders will be unable initially to remove the general
partner without its consent because the general partner and its
affiliates will own sufficient units upon completion of this
offering to be able to prevent its removal. The vote of the
holders of at least
662/3%
of all outstanding units voting together as a single class is
required to remove the general partner. Following the closing of
this offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation will own 79.6% of the
units. Also, if the general partner is removed without cause
during the subordination period and units held by the general
partner and Teekay Shipping Corporation are not voted in favor
of that removal, all remaining subordinated units will
automatically convert into common units and any existing
arrearages on the common units will be extinguished. A removal
of the general partner under these circumstances would adversely
affect the common units by prematurely eliminating their
distribution and liquidation preference over the subordinated
units, which would otherwise have continued until we had met
certain distribution and performance tests. Cause is narrowly
defined to mean that a court of competent jurisdiction has
entered a final, non-appealable judgment finding the general
partner liable for actual fraud or willful or wanton misconduct
in its capacity as our general partner. Cause does not include
most cases of charges of poor management of the business, so the
removal of the general partner because of the unitholders
dissatisfaction with the general partners performance in
managing our partnership will most likely result in the
termination of the subordination period.
Furthermore, unitholders voting rights are further
restricted by the partnership agreement provision providing that
any units held by a person that owns 20% or more of any class of
units then outstanding, other than the general partner, its
affiliates, their transferees, and persons who acquired such
units with the prior approval of the board of directors of the
general partner, cannot vote on any matter. Our partnership
agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of
unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our
operations, as well as other provisions limiting the
unitholders ability to influence the manner or direction
of management.
The control of our general
partner may be transferred to a third party without unitholder
consent.
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to
a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially
all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders. In
addition, our partnership agreement does not restrict the
ability of the members of our general partner from transferring
their respective membership interests in our general partner to
a third party. In the event of any such transfer, the new
members of our general partner would be in a position to replace
the board of directors and officers of our general partner with
their own choices and to control the decisions taken by the
board of directors and officers.
36
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$6.38 per common unit. |
The initial public offering price of $22.00 per common unit
exceeds pro forma net tangible book value of $15.62 per common
unit. Based on the initial public offering price, you will incur
immediate and substantial dilution of $6.38 per common unit.
This dilution results primarily because the assets contributed
by our general partner and its affiliates are recorded at their
historical cost, and not their fair value, in accordance with
GAAP. Please read Dilution.
|
|
|
We may issue additional common units without your
approval, which would dilute your ownership interests. |
Our general partner, without the approval of our unitholders,
may cause us to issue an unlimited number of additional units or
other equity securities.
The issuance by us of additional common units or other equity
securities of equal or senior rank will have the following
effects:
|
|
|
|
|
our unitholders proportionate ownership interest in us
will decrease; |
|
|
|
the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may
decrease; |
|
|
|
because a lower percentage of total outstanding units will be
subordinated units, the risk that a shortfall in the payment of
the minimum quarterly distribution will be borne by our common
unitholders will increase; |
|
|
|
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit
may be diminished; and |
|
|
|
the market price of the common units may decline. |
|
|
|
In establishing cash reserves, our general partner may
reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to
you. |
Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct
from operating surplus cash reserves that it determines are
necessary to fund our future operating expenditures. These
reserves also will affect the amount of cash available for
distribution. Our general partner may establish reserves for
distributions on the subordinated units, but only if those
reserves will not prevent us from distributing the full minimum
quarterly distribution, plus any arrearages, on the common units
for the following four quarters. As described above in
Risks Inherent in Our Business We must make
substantial capital expenditures to maintain the operating
capacity of our fleet, which will reduce our cash available for
distribution. In addition, each quarter our general partner is
required to deduct estimated maintenance capital expenditures
from operating surplus, which may result in less cash available
to unitholders than if actual maintenance capital expenditures
were deducted, the partnership agreement requires our
general partner each quarter to deduct from operating surplus
estimated maintenance capital expenditures, as opposed to actual
expenditures, which could reduce the amount of available cash
for distribution.
|
|
|
Our general partner has a limited call right that may
require you to sell your common units at an undesirable time or
price. |
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the common units, our general partner will have the
right, but not the obligation, which it may assign to any of its
affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of
the common units held by unaffiliated persons at a price not
less than their then-current market price. As a result, you may
be required to sell your common units at an undesirable time or
price and may not receive any return on your investment. You may
also incur a tax liability upon a sale of your units. For
additional information about the limited call right, please read
The Partnership Agreement Limited Call
Right.
At the completion of this offering and assuming no exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option, Teekay Shipping
Corporation, an affiliate of our general partner, will own 59.3%
of the common
37
units. At the end of the subordination period, assuming no
additional issuances of common units, no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option and conversion of our
subordinated units into common units, Teekay Shipping
Corporation will own 79.6% of the common units. Teekay Shipping
Corporation will also be able to acquire additional common units
if, in connection with the sale to us of its interest in three
RasGas II LNG newbuilding carriers, it elects to receive
common units in satisfaction of the $124.5 million cash
purchase price for those vessels. Accordingly, after
subordinated units are converted to common units our general
partner and its affiliates may own a sufficient percentage of
our common units to enable our general partner to exercise its
limited call right. Please read Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Agreement to Purchase
RasGas II Interest for additional information about
the agreement to purchase the RasGas II interest.
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of
unitholders owning 20% or more of our common units. |
Our partnership agreement restricts unitholders voting
rights by providing that any units held by a person that owns
20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, other than
our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees and
persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of the
board of directors of our general partner, cannot vote on any
matter. The partnership agreement also contains provisions
limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to
acquire information about our operations, as well as other
provisions limiting the unitholders ability to influence
the manner or direction of management.
|
|
|
You may not have limited liability if a court finds that
unitholder action constitutes control of our business. |
As a limited partner in a partnership organized under the laws
of the Marshall Islands, you could be held liable for our
obligations to the same extent as a general partner if you
participate in the control of our business. Our
general partner generally has unlimited liability for the
obligations of the partnership, such as its debts and
environmental liabilities, except for those contractual
obligations of the partnership that are expressly made without
recourse to our general partner. In addition, the Marshall
Islands Limited Partnership Act (or Marshall Islands Act)
provides that, under some circumstances, a unitholder may be
liable to us for the amount of a distribution for a period of
three years from the date of the distribution. In addition, the
limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner
interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not
been clearly established in some jurisdictions in which we do
business. Please read The Partnership
Agreement Limited Liability for a discussion
of the implications of the limitations on liability to a
unitholder.
|
|
|
Our financing agreements will contain operating and
financial restrictions which may restrict our business and
financing activities. |
The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our
financing arrangements and any future financing agreements could
adversely affect our ability to finance future operations or
capital needs or to engage, expand or pursue our business
activities. For example, the arrangements may restrict our
ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur or guarantee indebtedness; |
|
|
|
change ownership or structure, including mergers,
consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions; |
|
|
|
make dividends or distributions; |
|
|
|
make capital expenditures in excess of specified levels; |
|
|
|
make certain negative pledges and grant certain liens; |
|
|
|
sell, transfer, assign or convey assets; |
38
|
|
|
|
|
make certain loans and investments; and |
|
|
|
enter into a new line of business. |
In addition, some of our financing arrangements require our
subsidiaries to maintain restricted cash deposits and maintain
minimal levels of tangible net worth. Our ability to comply with
the covenants and restrictions contained in our debt instruments
may be affected by events beyond our control, including
prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If
market or other economic conditions deteriorate, our ability to
comply with these covenants may be impaired. If we are in breach
of any of the restrictions, covenants, ratios or tests in our
financing agreements, a significant portion of our obligations
may become immediately due and payable, and our lenders
commitment to make further loans to us may terminate. We might
not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these
accelerated payments. In addition, our obligations under a
revolving credit facility we entered into in connection with
this offering will be secured by certain of our assets, and if
we are unable to repay our debt under the credit facility, the
lenders could seek to foreclose on those assets. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation Liquidity and
Capital Resources Covenants and Other Restrictions
in Our Financing Agreements and Credit
Facility.
|
|
|
Restrictions in our debt agreements may prevent us from
paying distributions. |
Our payment of principal and interest on the debt and capital
lease obligations will reduce cash available for distribution on
our units. In addition, a number of our financing agreements
prohibit the payment of distributions upon the occurrence of the
following events, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to pay any principal, interest, fees, expenses or other
amounts when due; |
|
|
|
default under any vessel mortgage; |
|
|
|
failure to notify the lenders of any material oil spill or
discharge of hazardous material, or of any action or claim
related thereto; |
|
|
|
breach or lapse of any insurance with respect to the vessels; |
|
|
|
breach of certain financial covenants; |
|
|
|
failure to observe any other agreement, security instrument,
obligation or covenant beyond specified cure periods in certain
cases; |
|
|
|
default under other indebtedness of our operating company, our
general partner or any of our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
bankruptcy or insolvency events involving us, our general
partner or any of our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
failure of any representation or warranty to be materially
correct; |
|
|
|
a change of control, as defined in the applicable agreement; and |
|
|
|
a material adverse effect, as defined in the applicable
agreement, occurs relating to us or our business. |
We anticipate that any subsequent refinancing of our current
debt or any new debt will have similar restrictions. For more
information regarding our financing arrangements, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Covenants and Other Restrictions
in Our Financing Agreements.
39
|
|
|
We can borrow money to pay distributions, which would
reduce the amount of credit available to operate our
business. |
Our partnership agreement will allow us to make working capital
borrowings to pay distributions. Accordingly, we can make
distributions on all our units even though cash generated by our
operations may not be sufficient to pay such distributions. We
will be required to reduce all working capital borrowings for
this purpose under our revolving credit agreement to zero for a
period of at least 15 consecutive days once each 12-month
period. Any working capital borrowings by us to make
distributions will reduce the amount of working capital
borrowings we can make for operating our business. For more
information, please read Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Credit Facility.
|
|
|
Unitholders may have limited liquidity for their common
units. |
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the
common units. After this offering, there will be only 6,000,000
publicly traded common units. We do not know the extent to which
investor interest will lead to the development of a trading
market or how liquid that market might be. You may not be able
to resell your common units at or above the initial public
offering price. Additionally, the lack of liquidity may result
in wide bid-ask spreads, contribute to significant fluctuations
in the market price of the common units and limit the number of
investors who are able to buy the common units.
|
|
|
Unitholders may have liability to repay
distributions. |
Under some circumstances, unitholders may have to repay amounts
wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under the Marshall
Islands Act, we may not make a distribution to you if the
distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair
value of our assets. Marshall Islands law provides that for a
period of three years from the date of the impermissible
distribution, limited partners who received the distribution and
who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated
Marshall Islands law will be liable to the limited partnership
for the distribution amount. Assignees who become substituted
limited partners are liable for the obligations of the assignor
to make contributions to the partnership that are known to the
assignee at the time it became a limited partner and for unknown
obligations if the liabilities could be determined from the
partnership agreement. Liabilities to partners on account of
their partnership interest and liabilities that are non-recourse
to the partnership are not counted for purposes of determining
whether a distribution is permitted.
|
|
|
We have been organized as a limited partnership under the
laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not
have a well-developed body of partnership law. |
Our partnership affairs are governed by our partnership
agreement and by the Marshall Islands Act. The provisions of the
Marshall Islands Act resemble provisions of the limited
partnership laws of a number of states in the United States,
most notably Delaware. The Marshall Islands Act also provides
that it is to be interpreted according to the non-statutory law
of the State of Delaware. There have been, however, few, if any,
court cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the Marshall
Islands Act, in contrast to Delaware, which has a fairly
well-developed body of case law interpreting its limited
partnership statute. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether
Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as the
courts in Delaware. For example, the rights of our unitholders
and the fiduciary responsibilities of our general partner under
Marshall Islands law are not as clearly established as under
judicial precedent in existence in Delaware. As a result,
unitholders may have more difficulty in protecting their
interests in the face of actions by our general partner and its
officers and directors than would unitholders of a limited
partnership formed in the United States.
40
|
|
|
Because we are organized under the laws of the Marshall
Islands, it may be difficult to serve us with legal process or
enforce judgments against us, our directors or our
management. |
We are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, and all
of our assets are located outside of the United States. Our
business is operated primarily from our offices in the Bahamas
and Spain. In addition, our general partner is a Marshall
Islands limited liability company and its directors and officers
generally are or will be non-residents of the United States, and
all or a substantial portion of the assets of these
non-residents are located outside the United States. As a
result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an
action against us or against these individuals in the United
States if you believe that your rights have been infringed under
securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in
bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Marshall
Islands and of other jurisdictions may prevent or restrict you
from enforcing a judgment against our assets or the assets of
our general partner or its directors and officers. For more
information regarding the relevant laws of the Marshall Islands,
please read Enforcement of Civil Liabilities.
Tax Risks
In addition to the following risk factors, you should read
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences for a
more complete discussion of expected material U.S. federal
income tax consequences of owning and disposing of common units.
|
|
|
You may be required to pay U.S. taxes on your share
of our income even if you do not receive any cash distributions
from us. |
Assuming that you are a U.S. citizen, resident or other U.S.
taxpayer, you will be required to pay U.S. federal income taxes
and, in some cases, U.S. state and local income taxes on your
share of our taxable income, whether or not you receive cash
distributions from us. You may not receive cash distributions
from us equal to your share of our taxable income or even equal
to the actual tax liability that results from your share of our
taxable income.
|
|
|
Because distributions may reduce your tax basis in our
common units, you may realize greater gain on the disposition of
your units than you may otherwise expect, and you may have a tax
gain even if the price you receive is less than your original
cost. |
If you sell your common units, you will recognize gain or loss
for U.S. federal income tax purposes that is equal to the
difference between the amount realized and your tax basis in
those common units. Prior distributions to you in excess of the
total net taxable income (or earnings and profits if we are
treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes)
you were allocated for a common unit, which decreased your tax
basis in that common unit, will, in effect, become taxable
income to you if the common unit is sold at a price greater than
your tax basis in that common unit, even if the price you
receive is less than your original cost. Assuming we are not
treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a
substantial portion of the amount realized on a sale of units,
whether or not representing gain, may be ordinary income to you.
|
|
|
The after-tax benefit of an investment in the common units
may be reduced if we are not treated as a partnership for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. |
The anticipated after-tax benefit of an investment in the common
units may be reduced if we are not treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. As described below under
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
Classification as a Partnership, our status as a
partnership for such purposes depends upon our ability to earn
qualifying income. Our legal counsel is of the
opinion that, based upon certain representations made by us and
our general partner, it is more likely than not that we will be
classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. Because of the lack of certainty in this regard,
however, we are seeking a ruling from the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service (or IRS) regarding
41
the treatment of our anticipated income from shipping operations
as qualifying income. There can be no assurance that we will
obtain a favorable ruling from the IRS on this or any other
matter affecting us.
If we were not treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, we would instead be treated as a corporation for
such purposes, and you could suffer material adverse tax or
economic consequences, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We would not be permitted to adjust the tax basis of a secondary
market purchaser in our assets under Section 743(b) of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as described below under
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
Consequences of Unit Ownership Section 754
Election. As a result, a person who purchases common units
from you in the market may realize materially more taxable
income each year with respect to the units if we are treated as
a corporation than if we are treated as a partnership for U.S.
tax purposes. This could reduce the value of your common units. |
|
|
|
You would not be entitled to claim any credit against your U.S.
federal income tax liability for non-U.S. income tax liabilities
incurred by us if we are treated as a corporation for U.S. tax
purposes. Please read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Possible Classification as
a Corporation. |
|
|
|
If we are treated as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes and we
fail to qualify for an exemption from U.S. tax on the U.S.
source portion of our income attributable to transportation that
begins or ends (but not both) in the United States, we will be
subject to U.S. tax on such income on a gross basis (that is,
without any allowance for deductions) at a rate of 4%. The
imposition of this tax would have a negative effect on our
business and would result in decreased cash available for
distribution to you. Please read Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Consequences Possible Classification as a
Corporation Taxation of Operating Income. |
|
|
|
If the IRS were to treat us as a corporation, we may also
be considered a passive foreign investment company, which may
result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to you. |
If we were treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, it would have to be determined whether we should
be considered as a passive foreign investment company (or
PFIC) for such purposes. While we do not believe, based
upon our current assets and operations, that we would be
considered to be a PFIC even if we were treated as a
corporation, there is a meaningful risk that the IRS would
consider us to be a PFIC. Furthermore, there can be no assurance
that the manner and extent of our operations would not change in
the future such that we would be considered to be a PFIC for a
future taxable year in which we were treated as a corporation.
If we were considered to be a PFIC, you would be subject to an
adverse U.S. federal income tax regime. Under this regime,
a portion of the distributions you receive from us could be
(1) treated as if received ratably over each of the prior
years in which you held the common units, but not earlier than
the first year in which we were a PFIC, (2) subject to U.S.
federal income tax at the highest applicable marginal rate for
each such year and (3) subject to an interest charge for
the deemed deferral of this tax from each such year to the year
of the actual distribution. Similar rules would apply to the
gain, if any, you derive from the sale or other disposition of
common units. These rules can be avoided if you are eligible to
make and actually make a timely QEF election or
mark-to-market election with respect to your units, in which
case you will be required to include in income currently your
pro rata share of our income or the unrealized appreciation in
your common units, as applicable. If we determine that we are or
might be a PFIC, we will furnish you with information concerning
the potential availability of such elections. Please read
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Possible Classification as a
Corporation Consequences of Possible PFIC
Classification.
42
|
|
|
U.S. tax-exempt entities, regulated investment
companies and non-U.S. persons face unique U.S. tax
issues from owning common units that may result in adverse
U.S. tax consequences to them. |
Investments in common units by U.S. tax-exempt entities,
such as individual retirement accounts (known as IRAs),
regulated investment companies (known as mutual funds), and
non-U.S. persons raise issues unique to them. For example,
assuming we are classified as a partnership for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, virtually all of our income allocated to
organizations exempt from U.S. federal income tax,
including individual retirement accounts and other retirement
plans, will be unrelated business taxable income and generally
will be subject to U.S. federal income tax. Further, there
are restrictions and limitations on investments in us by
regulated investment companies. Finally, non-U.S. persons
may be subject to a 4% U.S. federal income tax on the
U.S. source portion of our gross income attributable to
transportation that begins or ends in the United States, or
distributions to them may be reduced on account of withholding
of U.S. federal income tax by us in the event we are
treated as having a fixed place of business in the United States
or otherwise earn U.S. effectively connected income, unless
an exemption applies and they file U.S. federal income tax
returns to claim such exemption.
|
|
|
You may be subject to income tax in one or more non-U.S.
countries, including Canada, as a result of owning our common
units if, under the laws of any such country, we are considered
to be carrying on business there. Such laws may require you to
file a tax return with and pay taxes to those countries. Any
foreign taxes imposed on us or any of our subsidiaries will
reduce our cash available for distribution to you. |
We intend that our affairs and the business of each of our
subsidiaries will be conducted and operated in a manner that
minimizes foreign income taxes imposed upon us and our
subsidiaries or which may be imposed upon you as a result of
owning our common units. However, there is a risk that you will
be subject to tax in one or more countries, including Canada, as
a result of owning our common units if, under the laws of any
such country, we are considered to be carrying on business
there. If you are subject to tax in any such country, you may be
required to file a tax return with and to pay tax in that
country based on your allocable share of our income. We may be
required to reduce distributions to you on account of any
withholding obligations imposed upon us by that country in
respect of such allocation to you. The United States may not
allow a tax credit for any foreign income taxes that you
directly or indirectly incur.
We believe we can conduct our activities in a manner so that our
unitholders should not be considered to be carrying on business
in Canada solely as a consequence of the acquisition, holding,
disposition or redemption of our common units. However, the
question of whether either we or any of our subsidiaries will be
treated as carrying on business in any country, including
Canada, will largely be a question of fact determined through an
analysis of our contractual arrangements, including the services
agreements we and certain of our operating subsidiaries will
enter into with subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation, and
the way we conduct our business or operations, all of which may
change over time. Please read Non-United States Tax
Consequences Canadian Federal Income Tax
Consequences. The laws of Canada or any other foreign
country may also change, which could cause the countrys
taxing authorities to determine that we are carrying on business
in such country and are subject to its taxation laws.
Any foreign taxes imposed on us or any of our subsidiaries will
reduce our cash available for you.
43
USE OF PROCEEDS
We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately
$122.8 million from the sale of 6,000,000 common units
offered by this prospectus, after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and structuring fees but before paying
estimated offering expenses.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
repay a $119.4 million non-interest bearing demand note due
to Teekay Shipping Corporation; and |
|
|
|
|
pay $3.4 million of estimated expenses associated with this
offering and the related transactions. |
In connection with its contribution of assets to us and this
offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation loaned $129.4 million
to us in the form of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the $119.4 million non-interest bearing note described
above, and |
|
|
|
|
|
a $10.0 million 7.6% fixed-rate note payable in 2016. |
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation also contributed to us an amount
that we used, together with the loans and our existing cash, to
repay term loans associated with two of our LNG carriers and to
settle interest rate swaps associated with $769.3 million
of our debt. As of December 31, 2004, the amount of debt to
be repaid would have been $338.5 million (which reduced by
its amortization prior to repayment) and the swap settlement
cost would have been $134.8 million. The actual amount of
the term loan debt repaid in 2005 was $337.3 million and
the swap settlement cost was $143.3 million.
The debt associated with two of our LNG carriers that we repaid
had fluctuating interest rates based on the London Interbank
Offered Rate (or LIBOR) or Euro Interbank Offered Rate
(or EURIBOR), plus a margin of 1.20%. The maturity dates
for the term loans were between 2009 and 2022. We had interest
rate swaps for both of these debt facilities, whereby we paid a
fixed interest rate on the debt instead of the fluctuating
rates. These swaps had effective interest rates ranging from
6.40% to 6.97%, excluding the margin we paid on the
floating-rate debt. The additional interest rate swaps we
settled had effective interest rates ranging from 5.62% to
6.26%, excluding the margin we paid on the floating-rate debt.
These interest rate swaps were associated with
$430.8 million of debt that we did not repay, and we
entered into new interest rate swaps at the same time as we
settled the swaps.
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option, we
will use the net proceeds to repay all or a portion of the
interest bearing note to Teekay Shipping Corporation and, to the
extent of any excess net proceeds, for general working capital
purposes or to repay additional debt.
44
CAPITALIZATION
The following table shows:
|
|
|
|
|
our historical capitalization as of December 31, 2004; and |
|
|
|
our pro forma capitalization as of December 31, 2004,
adjusted to reflect the offering of the common units, the
application of the net proceeds we receive in this offering and
the repayment of debt and settlement of interest rate swaps in
connection with this offering in the manner described under
Use of Proceeds on the preceding page and the
related formation and contribution transactions. See
Summary The Transactions. |
This table is derived from and should be read together with the
historical consolidated financial statements of Teekay
Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and our pro forma consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes. You should also read this
table in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
|
|
$ |
156,410 |
|
|
$ |
21,562 |
|
Restricted cash(2)
|
|
|
435,112 |
|
|
|
435,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and restricted cash
|
|
$ |
591,522 |
|
|
$ |
456,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from affiliate (including accrued interest)(1)(3)
|
|
|
465,695 |
|
|
|
10,030 |
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
|
787,126 |
|
|
|
448,584 |
|
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases(2)
|
|
|
601,048 |
|
|
|
601,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,853,869 |
|
|
|
1,059,662 |
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders/Partners deficit
|
|
|
(123,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Held by public:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,355 |
|
|
Held by the general partner and its affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,147 |
|
|
|
Subordinated units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,755 |
|
|
|
General partner interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(123,002 |
) |
|
|
687,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
1,730,867 |
|
|
$ |
1,747,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In 2005, we repaid $337.3 million of Teekay Spain term
loans and paid $143.3 million to settle interest rate swaps
associated with $769.3 million of Teekay Spain debt. We
used a combination of our existing cash and contributions and
loans to us from Teekay Shipping Corporation to fund these
payments. As of December 31, 2004, the amount of the Teekay
Spain term loans was $338.5 million and the swap settlement
costs would have been $134.8 million. The differences
between the December 31, 2004 amounts and the actual
amounts primarily reflect amortization of the debt and the
effect of interest rate changes since year end. If we had paid
these amounts on December 31, 2004, we would have used
$134.8 million of existing cash and contributions and loans
to us from Teekay Shipping Corporation of $209.1 million
and $129.4 million, respectively. |
|
|
(2) |
Under certain capital lease arrangements, we maintain restricted
cash deposits that, together with interest earned on the
deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the
capital leases. The interest we receive from those deposits is
used solely to pay interest associated with the capital |
45
|
|
|
leases, and the amount of interest we receive approximates the
amount of interest we pay on the capital leases. |
|
|
(3) |
Prior to or at the closing of this offering, Teekay Shipping
Corporation will contribute to us a note receivable from Luxco
in the amount of $465.7 million. This note receivable is
eliminated in our pro forma capitalization as an intercompany
amount. |
|
46
DILUTION
Dilution is the amount by which the offering price will exceed
the net tangible book value per common unit after this offering.
Using the initial public offering price of $22.00 per
common unit, on a pro forma basis as of December 31, 2004,
after giving effect to this offering of common units and the
related formation and contribution transactions and the
repayment of debt prior to the offering as described in
Use of Proceeds, our net tangible book value was
$469.7 million, or $15.62 per common unit. Purchasers
of common units in this offering will experience substantial and
immediate dilution in net tangible book value per common unit
for financial accounting purposes, as illustrated in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial public offering price per common unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22.00 |
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per common unit before this
offering(1)
|
|
$ |
14.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per common unit attributable
to purchasers in this offering
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Pro forma net tangible book value per common unit after
this offering(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate dilution in net tangible book value per common unit to
purchasers in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Determined by dividing the total number of units (8,734,572
common units, 14,734,572 subordinated units and the 2% general
partner interest, which has a dilutive effect equivalent to
601,411 units) to be issued to our general partner and its
affiliates for their contribution of assets and liabilities to
us into the net tangible book value of the contributed assets
and liabilities. The dilutive effect of the general
partners interest was determined by multiplying the total
number of units deemed to be outstanding after this offering
(i.e., the total number of common and subordinated units
outstanding divided by 98%) by the general partners 2%
general partner interest. |
|
|
|
(2) |
Determined by dividing the total number of units (14,734,572
common units, 14,734,572 subordinated units and the 2% general
partner interest, which has a dilutive effect equivalent to
601,411 units) to be outstanding after this offering into
our pro forma net tangible book value, after giving effect to
the application of the net proceeds of this offering. |
|
The following table sets forth the number of units that we will
issue and the total consideration contributed to us by our
general partner and its affiliates and by the purchasers of
common units in this offering upon consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units Acquired | |
|
Total Consideration | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
General partner and its affiliates(1)(2)
|
|
|
24,070,555 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
$ |
568,095,845 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
% |
New investors
|
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
132,000,000 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
30,070,555 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
700,095,845 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
prospectus, our general partner and its affiliates will own an
aggregate of 8,734,572 common units and 14,734,572 subordinated
units and the 2% general partner interest, which has a dilutive
effect equivalent to 601,411 units. |
|
|
|
(2) |
The assets contributed by our general partner and its affiliates
were recorded at book value in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. Book value
of the consideration provided by our general partner and its
affiliates, as of December 31, 2004, was
$568.1 million. |
|
47
CASH DISTRIBUTION POLICY
Distributions of Available Cash
Within approximately 45 days after the end of each quarter,
beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2005, we will
distribute all of our available cash to unitholders of record on
the applicable record date. We will adjust the minimum quarterly
distribution for the period from the closing of this offering
through June 30, 2005 based on the actual length of the
period.
|
|
|
Definition of Available Cash |
We define available cash in the glossary, and it generally
means, for each fiscal quarter, all cash on hand at the end of
the quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves established by our general
partner to: |
|
|
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of our business (including
reserves for future capital expenditures and for our anticipated
credit needs); |
|
|
|
comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments, or
other agreements; or |
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our
general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters; |
|
|
|
|
|
plus all cash on hand on the date of determination of available
cash for the quarter resulting from working capital borrowings
made after the end of the quarter. Working capital borrowings
are generally borrowings that are made under our credit
agreement and in all cases are used solely for working capital
purposes or to pay distributions to partners. |
|
|
|
Intent to Distribute the Minimum Quarterly
Distribution |
We intend to distribute to the holders of common units and
subordinated units on a quarterly basis at least the minimum
quarterly distribution of $0.4125 per unit, or $1.65 per year,
to the extent we have sufficient cash on hand to pay the
distribution after we establish cash reserves and pay fees and
expenses. The amount of available cash from operating surplus
needed to pay the minimum quarterly distribution for one quarter
on all units outstanding immediately after this offering and the
related distribution on the 2% general partner interest is
approximately $12.4 million. There is no guarantee that we
will pay the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units
and subordinated units in any quarter, and we will be prohibited
from making any distributions to unitholders if it would cause
an event of default, or an event of default is existing, under
our credit agreement. Please read Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Covenants and Other Restrictions in Our
Financing Agreements for a discussion of the restrictions
to be included in our credit agreement that may restrict our
ability to make distributions.
Operating Surplus and Capital Surplus
All cash distributed to unitholders will be characterized as
either operating surplus or capital
surplus. We treat distributions of available cash from
operating surplus differently than distributions of available
cash from capital surplus.
48
|
|
|
Definition of Operating Surplus |
We define operating surplus in the glossary, and for any period
it generally means:
|
|
|
|
|
our cash balance on the closing date of this offering, other
than cash reserved to terminate interest rate swap
agreements; plus |
|
|
|
$10 million (as described below); plus |
|
|
|
|
all of our cash receipts after the closing of this offering,
excluding cash from (1) borrowings, other than working
capital borrowings, (2) sales of equity and debt
securities, (3) sales or other dispositions of assets
outside the ordinary course of business, (4) termination of
interest rate swap agreements, (5) capital contributions or
(6) corporate reorganizations or restructurings; plus |
|
|
|
|
working capital borrowings made after the end of a quarter but
before the date of determination of operating surplus for the
quarter; plus |
|
|
|
|
interest paid on debt incurred (including periodic net payments
under related interest rate swap agreements) and cash
distributions paid on equity securities issued, in each case, to
finance all or any portion of the construction, replacement or
improvement of a capital asset such as vessels during the period
from such financing until the earlier to occur of the date the
capital asset is put into service or the date that it is
abandoned or disposed of; plus |
|
|
|
|
|
interest paid on debt incurred (including periodic net payments
under related interest rate swap agreements) and cash
distributions paid on equity securities issued, in each case, to
pay the construction period interest on debt incurred, or to pay
construction period distributions on equity issued, to finance
the construction projects described in the immediately preceding
bullet; less |
|
|
|
|
|
all of our cash operating expenditures after the closing of this
offering and the repayment of working capital borrowings, but
not (1) the repayment of other borrowings, (2) actual
maintenance capital expenditures or expansion capital
expenditures, (3) transaction expenses (including taxes)
related to interim capital transactions or
(4) distributions; less |
|
|
|
|
estimated maintenance capital expenditures and the amount of
cash reserves established by our general partner to provide
funds for future operating expenditures. |
As described above, operating surplus does not only reflect
actual cash on hand at closing that is available for
distribution to our unitholders. For example, it also includes a
provision that will enable us, if we choose, to distribute as
operating surplus up to $10 million of cash we receive in
the future from non-operating sources, such as asset sales,
issuances of securities and long-term borrowings, that would
otherwise be distributed as capital surplus. In addition, the
effect of including, as described above, certain cash
distributions on equity securities or interest payments on debt
in operating surplus would be to increase operating surplus by
the amount of any such cash distributions or interest payments.
As a result, we may also distribute as operating surplus up to
the amount of any such cash distributions or interest payments
of cash we receive from non-operating sources.
Capital Expenditures
For purposes of determining operating surplus, maintenance
capital expenditures are those capital expenditures required to
maintain over the long term the operating capacity of or the
revenue generated by our capital assets, and expansion capital
expenditures are those capital expenditures that increase the
operating capacity of or the revenue generated by our capital
assets. To the extent, however, that capital expenditures
associated with acquiring a new vessel increase the revenues or
the operating capacity of our fleet, those capital expenditures
would be classified as expansion capital expenditures.
Examples of maintenance capital expenditures include capital
expenditures associated with drydocking a vessel or acquiring a
new vessel to the extent such expenditures are incurred to
maintain the operating capacity of or the revenue generated by
our fleet. Maintenance capital expenditures will also include
interest (and related fees) on debt incurred and distributions
on equity issued to finance the construction
49
of a replacement vessel and paid during the construction period,
which we define as the period beginning on the date that we
enter into a binding construction contract and ending on the
earlier of the date that the replacement vessel commences
commercial service or the date that the replacement vessel is
abandoned or disposed of. Debt incurred to pay or equity issued
to fund construction period interest payments, and distributions
on such equity, will also be considered maintenance capital
expenditures.
Because our maintenance capital expenditures can be very large
and vary significantly in timing, the amount of our actual
maintenance capital expenditures may differ substantially from
period to period, which could cause similar fluctuations in the
amounts of operating surplus, adjusted operating surplus, and
available cash for distribution to our unitholders if we
subtracted actual maintenance capital expenditures from
operating surplus each quarter. Accordingly, to eliminate the
effect on operating surplus of these fluctuations, our
partnership agreement will require that an amount equal to an
estimate of the average quarterly maintenance capital
expenditures necessary to maintain the operating capacity of or
the revenue generated by our capital assets over the long term
be subtracted from operating surplus each quarter, as opposed to
the actual amounts spent. The amount of estimated maintenance
capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject
to review and change by the board of directors of our general
partner at least once a year, provided that any change must be
approved by our conflicts committee. The estimate will be made
at least annually and whenever an event occurs that is likely to
result in a material adjustment to the amount of our maintenance
capital expenditures, such as a major acquisition or the
introduction of new governmental regulations that will affect
our fleet. For purposes of calculating operating surplus, any
adjustment to this estimate will be prospective only. For a
discussion of the amounts we have allocated toward estimated
maintenance capital expenditures, please read Cash
Available for Distribution.
The use of estimated maintenance capital expenditures in
calculating operating surplus will have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
it will reduce the risk that actual maintenance capital
expenditures in any one quarter will be large enough to make
operating surplus less than the minimum quarterly distribution
to be paid on all the units for that quarter and subsequent
quarters; |
|
|
|
it will reduce the need for us to borrow under our working
capital facility to pay distributions; |
|
|
|
it will be more difficult for us to raise our distribution above
the minimum quarterly distribution and pay incentive
distributions to our general partner; and |
|
|
|
it will reduce the likelihood that a large maintenance capital
expenditure in a period will prevent the general partners
affiliates from being able to convert some or all of their
subordinated units into common units since the effect of an
estimate is to spread the expected expense over several periods,
mitigating the effect of the actual payment of the expenditure
on any single period. |
|
|
|
Definition of Capital Surplus |
We also define capital surplus in the glossary, and it generally
will be generated only by:
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings other than working capital borrowings; |
|
|
|
sales of debt and equity securities; and |
|
|
|
sales or other dispositions of assets for cash, other than
inventory, accounts receivable and other current assets sold in
the ordinary course of business or non-current assets sold as
part of normal retirements or replacements of assets. |
|
|
|
Characterization of Cash Distributions |
We will treat all available cash distributed as coming from
operating surplus until the sum of all available cash
distributed since we began operations equals the operating
surplus as of the most recent date of determination of available
cash. We will treat any amount distributed in excess of
operating surplus,
50
regardless of its source, as capital surplus. We do not
anticipate that we will make any distributions from capital
surplus.
Subordination Period
During the subordination period, which we define below and in
the glossary, the common units will have the right to receive
distributions of available cash from operating surplus in an
amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125
per quarter, plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution on the common units from prior quarters,
before any distributions of available cash from operating
surplus may be made on the subordinated units. The purpose of
the subordinated units is to increase the likelihood that during
the subordination period there will be available cash to be
distributed on the common units.
|
|
|
Definition of Subordination Period |
We define the subordination period in the glossary. The
subordination period will extend until the first day of any
quarter, beginning after March 31, 2010, that each of the
following tests are met:
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each
of the outstanding common units and subordinated units equaled
or exceeded the minimum quarterly distribution for each of the
three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
immediately preceding that date; |
|
|
|
the adjusted operating surplus (as defined below)
generated during each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping
four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date equaled or
exceeded the sum of the minimum quarterly distributions on all
of the outstanding common units and subordinated units during
those periods on a fully diluted basis and the related
distribution on the 2% general partner interest during those
periods; and |
|
|
|
there are no arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units. |
If the unitholders remove our general partner without cause, the
subordination period may end before March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Early Conversion of Subordinated Units |
Before the end of the subordination period, 50% of the
subordinated units, or up to 7,367,286 subordinated units,
may convert into common units on a one-for-one basis immediately
after the distribution of available cash to the partners in
respect of any quarter ending on or after:
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 with respect to 25% of the subordinated
units outstanding immediately after this offering; and |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 with respect to a further 25% of the
subordinated units outstanding immediately after this offering. |
The early conversions will occur if at the end of the applicable
quarter each of the following occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each
of the outstanding common units and subordinated units equaled
or exceeded the minimum quarterly distribution for each of the
three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
immediately preceding that date; |
|
|
|
the adjusted operating surplus generated during each of the
three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
immediately preceding that date equaled or exceeded the sum of
the minimum quarterly distributions on all of the outstanding
common units and subordinated units during those periods on a
fully diluted basis and the related distribution on the 2%
general partner interest during those periods; and |
|
|
|
there are no arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units. |
51
However, the second early conversion of the subordinated units
may not occur until at least one year following the first early
conversion of the subordinated units.
For purposes of determining whether sufficient adjusted
operating surplus has been generated under these conversion
tests, the conflicts committee may adjust adjusted operating
surplus upwards or downwards if it determines in good faith that
the estimated amount of maintenance capital expenditures used in
the determination of operating surplus was materially incorrect,
based on circumstances prevailing at the time of original
determination of the estimate.
|
|
|
Definition of Adjusted Operating Surplus |
We define adjusted operating surplus in the glossary, and for
any period it generally means:
|
|
|
|
|
operating surplus generated with respect to that period; less |
|
|
|
any net increase in working capital borrowings with respect to
that period; less |
|
|
|
any net reduction in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period not relating to an operating
expenditure made with respect to that period; plus |
|
|
|
any net decrease in working capital borrowings with respect to
that period; plus |
|
|
|
any net increase in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period required by any debt instrument for
the repayment of principal, interest or premium. |
Adjusted operating surplus is intended to reflect the cash
generated from operations during a particular period and
therefore excludes net increases in working capital borrowings
and net drawdowns of reserves of cash generated in prior periods.
|
|
|
Effect of Expiration of the Subordination Period |
Upon expiration of the subordination period, each outstanding
subordinated unit will convert into one common unit and will
then participate pro rata with the other common units in
distributions of available cash. In addition, if the unitholders
remove our general partner other than for cause and units held
by our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor
of such removal:
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and each subordinated unit
will immediately convert into one common unit; |
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and |
|
|
|
our general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner interest and, if any, its incentive distribution rights
into common units or to receive cash in exchange for those
interests. |
Distributions of Available Cash From Operating Surplus During
the Subordination Period
We will make distributions of available cash from operating
surplus for any quarter during the subordination period in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our
general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common
unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for
that quarter; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our
general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common
unit an amount equal to any arrearages in payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution on the common units for any prior
quarters during the subordination period; |
|
|
|
third, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
our general partner, until we distribute for each subordinated
unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for
that quarter; and |
52
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter, in the manner described in
Incentive Distribution Rights below. |
Distributions of Available Cash From Operating Surplus After
the Subordination Period
We will make distributions of available cash from operating
surplus for any quarter after the subordination period in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general
partner, until we distribute for each outstanding unit an amount
equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that quarter; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, in the manner described in
Incentive Distribution Rights below. |
Incentive Distribution Rights
Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an
increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available
cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels have been
achieved. Our general partner currently holds the incentive
distribution rights, but may transfer these rights separately
from its general partner interest, subject to restrictions in
the partnership agreement.
If for any quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus to the
common and subordinated unitholders in an amount equal to the
minimum quarterly distribution; and |
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus on
outstanding common units in an amount necessary to eliminate any
cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution; |
then, we will distribute any additional available cash from
operating surplus for that quarter among the unitholders and our
general partner in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general
partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.4625 per unit for that quarter (the first target
distribution); |
|
|
|
second, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to our general
partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.5375 per unit for that quarter (the second target
distribution); |
|
|
|
third, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to our general
partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.6500 per unit for that quarter (the third target
distribution); and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to our
general partner. |
In each case, the amount of the target distribution set forth
above is exclusive of any distributions to common unitholders to
eliminate any cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution. The percentage interests set forth above
for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest
and assume the general partner has not transferred the incentive
distribution rights.
Percentage Allocations of Available Cash From Operating
Surplus
The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of
the additional available cash from operating surplus among the
unitholders and our general partner up to the various target
distribution levels. The amounts set forth under Marginal
Percentage Interest in Distributions are the percentage
interests of the unitholders and our general partner in any
available cash from operating surplus we distribute up to and
including the corresponding amount in the column Total
Quarterly Distribution Target Amount, until available cash
from operating surplus we distribute reaches the next target
distribution level, if any. The percentage interests shown for
the unitholders and our general partner for the minimum
quarterly distribution are also applicable to quarterly
distribution amounts that are less than the minimum quarterly
53
distribution. The percentage interests shown for our general
partner include its 2% general partner interest and assume the
general partner has not transferred the incentive distribution
rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal Percentage Interest | |
|
|
|
|
in Distributions | |
|
|
Total Quarterly |
|
| |
|
|
Distribution Target Amount |
|
Unitholders | |
|
General Partner | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
|
|
$0.4125 |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
First Target Distribution
|
|
up to $0.4625 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Second Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.4625 up to $0.5375 |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Third Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.5375 up to $0.6500 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
above $0.6500 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Distributions From Capital Surplus
|
|
|
How Distributions From Capital Surplus Will Be Made |
We will make distributions of available cash from capital
surplus, if any, in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general
partner, until we distribute for each common unit that was
issued in this offering, an amount of available cash from
capital surplus equal to the initial public offering price; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our
general partner, until we distribute for each common unit, an
amount of available cash from capital surplus equal to any
unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, we will make all distributions of available cash
from capital surplus as if they were from operating surplus. |
|
|
|
Effect of a Distribution From Capital Surplus |
The partnership agreement treats a distribution of capital
surplus as the repayment of the initial unit price from this
offering, which is a return of capital. The initial public
offering price less any distributions of capital surplus per
unit is referred to as the unrecovered initial unit
price. Each time a distribution of capital surplus is
made, the minimum quarterly distribution and the target
distribution levels will be reduced in the same proportion as
the corresponding reduction in the unrecovered initial unit
price. Because distributions of capital surplus will reduce the
minimum quarterly distribution, after any of these distributions
are made, it may be easier for our general partner to receive
incentive distributions and for the subordinated units to
convert into common units. However, any distribution of capital
surplus before the unrecovered initial unit price is reduced to
zero cannot be applied to the payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution or any arrearages.
Once we distribute capital surplus on a unit issued in this
offering in an amount equal to the initial public offering
price, we will reduce the minimum quarterly distribution and the
target distribution levels to zero. We will then make all future
distributions from operating surplus, with 50% being paid to the
holders of units and 50% to our general partner. The percentage
interests shown for our general partner include its 2% general
partner interest and assume the general partner has not
transferred the incentive distribution rights.
Adjustment to the Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target
Distribution Levels
In addition to adjusting the minimum quarterly distribution and
target distribution levels to reflect a distribution of capital
surplus, if we combine our units into fewer units or subdivide
our units into a greater number of units, we will
proportionately adjust:
|
|
|
|
|
the minimum quarterly distribution; |
|
|
|
the target distribution levels; |
54
|
|
|
|
|
the unrecovered initial unit price; and |
|
|
|
the number of common units issuable during the subordination
period without a unitholder vote. |
For example, if a two-for-one split of the common units should
occur, the minimum quarterly distribution, the target
distribution levels and the unrecovered initial unit price would
each be reduced to 50% of its initial level and the number of
common units issuable during the subordination period without a
unitholder vote would double. We will not make any adjustment by
reason of the issuance of additional units for cash or property.
In addition, if legislation is enacted or if existing law is
modified or interpreted by a governmental taxing authority so
that we become taxable as a corporation or otherwise subject to
taxation as an entity for U.S. federal, state, local or
non-U.S. income tax purposes, we will reduce the minimum
quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels for
each quarter by multiplying each distribution level by a
fraction, the numerator of which is available cash for that
quarter and the denominator of which is the sum of available
cash for that quarter plus the general partners estimate
of our aggregate liability for the quarter for such income taxes
payable by reason of such legislation or interpretation. To the
extent that the actual tax liability differs from the estimated
tax liability for any quarter, the difference will be accounted
for in subsequent quarters.
Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation
If we dissolve in accordance with the partnership agreement, we
will sell or otherwise dispose of our assets in a process called
liquidation. We will first apply the proceeds of liquidation to
the payment of our creditors. We will distribute any remaining
proceeds to the unitholders and our general partner, in
accordance with their capital account balances, as adjusted to
reflect any gain or loss upon the sale or other disposition of
our assets in liquidation.
The allocations of gain and loss upon liquidation are intended,
to the extent possible, to entitle the holders of outstanding
common units to a preference over the holders of outstanding
subordinated units upon our liquidation, to the extent required
to permit common unitholders to receive their unrecovered
initial unit price plus the minimum quarterly distribution for
the quarter during which liquidation occurs plus any unpaid
arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on
the common units. However, there may not be sufficient gain upon
our liquidation to enable the holders of common units to fully
recover all of these amounts, even though there may be cash
available for distribution to the holders of subordinated units.
Any further net gain recognized upon liquidation will be
allocated in a manner that takes into account the incentive
distribution rights of our general partner.
|
|
|
Manner of Adjustments for Gain |
The manner of the adjustment for gain is set forth in the
partnership agreement. If our liquidation occurs before the end
of the subordination period, we will allocate any gain to the
partners in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, to our general partner and the holders of units who have
negative balances in their capital accounts to the extent of and
in proportion to those negative balances; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our
general partner, until the capital account for each common unit
is equal to the sum of: |
|
|
|
(1) the unrecovered initial unit price; |
|
|
(2) the amount of the minimum quarterly distribution for
the quarter during which our liquidation occurs; and |
|
|
(3) any unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution; |
55
|
|
|
|
|
third, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
our general partner until the capital account for each
subordinated unit is equal to the sum of: |
|
|
|
(1) the unrecovered initial unit price; and |
|
|
(2) the amount of the minimum quarterly distribution for
the quarter during which our liquidation occurs; |
|
|
|
|
|
fourth, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general
partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an amount per
unit equal to: |
|
|
|
(1) the sum of the excess of the first target distribution
per unit over the minimum quarterly distribution per unit for
each quarter of our existence; less |
|
|
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the minimum
quarterly distribution per unit that we distributed 98% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, for each
quarter of our existence; |
|
|
|
|
|
fifth, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to our general
partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an amount per
unit equal to: |
|
|
|
(1) the sum of the excess of the second target distribution
per unit over the first target distribution per unit for each
quarter of our existence; less |
|
|
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the first
target distribution per unit that we distributed 85% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to our general partner for
each quarter of our existence; |
|
|
|
|
|
sixth, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to our general
partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an amount per
unit equal to: |
|
|
|
(1) the sum of the excess of the third target distribution
per unit over the second target distribution per unit for each
quarter of our existence; less |
|
|
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the second
target distribution per unit that we distributed 75% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to our general partner for each
quarter of our existence; and |
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to our
general partner. |
The percentage interests set forth above for our general partner
include its 2% general partner interest and assume the general
partner has not transferred the incentive distribution rights.
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that clause (3) of the second
bullet point above and all of the third bullet point above will
no longer be applicable.
|
|
|
Manner of Adjustments for Losses |
If our liquidation occurs before the end of the subordination
period, we will generally allocate any loss to our general
partner and the unitholders in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to holders of subordinated units in proportion to the
positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to our
general partner, until the capital accounts of the subordinated
unitholders have been reduced to zero; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the holders of common units in proportion to the
positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to our
general partner, until the capital accounts of the common
unitholders have been reduced to zero; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 100% to our general partner. |
56
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that the first bullet point above will
no longer be applicable.
|
|
|
Adjustments to Capital Accounts |
We will make adjustments to capital accounts upon the issuance
of additional units. In doing so, we will allocate any
unrealized and, for tax purposes, unrecognized gain or loss
resulting from the adjustments to the unitholders and our
general partner in the same manner as we allocate gain or loss
upon liquidation. In the event that we make positive adjustments
to the capital accounts upon the issuance of additional units,
we will allocate any later negative adjustments to the capital
accounts resulting from the issuance of additional units or upon
our liquidation in a manner which results, to the extent
possible, in our general partners capital account balances
equaling the amount which they would have been if no earlier
positive adjustments to the capital accounts had been made.
57
CASH AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION
General
We intend to pay each quarter, to the extent we have sufficient
available cash from operating surplus, the minimum quarterly
distribution of $0.4125 per unit, or $1.65 per unit on an annual
basis, on all the common units and subordinated units. The
amounts of available cash from operating surplus needed to pay
the minimum quarterly distribution for one quarter and for four
quarters on the common units, the subordinated units, and the 2%
general partner interest to be outstanding immediately after
this offering are approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Quarter | |
|
Four Quarters | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Common units
|
|
$ |
6,078 |
|
|
$ |
24,312 |
|
Subordinated units
|
|
|
6,078 |
|
|
|
24,312 |
|
2% general partner interest
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
12,404 |
|
|
$ |
49,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma, As Adjusted Available Cash From Operating
Surplus
|
|
|
Pro forma, as adjusted available cash from operating
surplus generated during 2004 would have been sufficient to pay
the minimum quarterly distribution on all units. |
If we had completed the transactions contemplated in this
prospectus on January 1, 2004, pro forma available cash
from operating surplus would have been approximately
$70.4 million for 2004. Pro forma available cash from
operating surplus represents available cash from operating
surplus generated during the respective periods on a pro forma
basis (excluding any cash from working capital borrowings, cash
on hand on the closing date of this offering and the
$10.0 million that are included in the cumulative
calculation of operating surplus under our partnership
agreement). As described in Cash Distribution
Policy, cash from these sources may also be used to pay
distributions.
Pro forma available cash from operating surplus includes
incremental general and administrative expenses we will incur as
a result of being a publicly traded limited partnership, such as
costs associated with annual and quarterly reports to
unitholders, tax return and Schedule K-1 preparation and
distribution, investor relations, registrar and transfer agent
fees, incremental director and officer liability insurance costs
and director compensation. We expect these incremental general
and administrative expenses to total approximately
$1.0 million per year. Furthermore, pro forma available
cash from operating surplus is determined after deducting actual
maintenance capital expenditures, but under the partnership
agreement we will be required to deduct from operating surplus
our estimated maintenance capital expenditures, instead of our
actual maintenance capital expenditures. Please read Cash
Distribution Policy Operating Surplus and Capital
Surplus. The amount of our estimated maintenance capital
expenditures exceeds our actual maintenance capital expenditures
in 2004. The amount of estimated maintenance capital
expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject to
review and change by the board of directors of our general
partner not less frequently than once per year, with any change
required to be approved by our conflicts committee.
We currently expect that our estimated maintenance capital
expenditures will initially be $16.4 million per year,
which is comprised of $4.4 million for drydocking costs for
all of our vessels and $12.0 million for replacing our LNG
carriers and Suezmax tankers at the end of their useful lives.
The amount of estimated maintenance capital expenditures
attributable to future drydocking expenses is based on the
average annual anticipated costs of drydockings over the
remaining useful lives our vessels. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Ongoing Capital Expenditures.
58
The amount of estimated maintenance capital expenditures
attributable to future vessel replacements is based on the
following assumptions, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
an estimated useful life of 40 years for our LNG carriers
and 25 years for our Suezmax tankers; |
|
|
|
an estimated replacement cost of $185 million per LNG
carrier and $55 million per Suezmax tanker; and |
|
|
|
a market-based rate of return and financing costs. |
The actual cost of replacing the vessels in our fleet will
depend on a number of factors, including prevailing market
conditions, charter hire rates and the availability and cost of
financing at the time of replacement. The board of directors of
our general partner, with the approval of its conflicts
committee, may determine that one or more of our assumptions
should be revised, which could cause the board to increase the
amount of our estimated maintenance capital expenditures. We may
elect to fund some or all of these costs through the issuance of
additional common units, which may be dilutive to existing
unitholders. Please read Risk Factors Risks
Inherent in Our Business We must make substantial
capital expenditures to maintain the operating capacity of our
fleet, which will reduce our cash available for
distribution.
We derive pro forma, as adjusted available cash from operating
surplus by subtracting from pro forma available cash from
operating surplus the additional maintenance capital
expenditures we will be required to deduct from operating
surplus under the terms of our partnership agreement. Our pro
forma, as adjusted available cash from operating surplus
generated during 2004 would have been $58.0 million. This
amount would have been sufficient to allow us to pay the full
minimum quarterly distribution on all of our units.
We derived the amounts of pro forma available cash from
operating surplus from the pro forma financial statements in the
manner described in Appendix D. The pro forma adjustments
are based upon currently available information and specific
estimates and assumptions. The pro forma financial statements do
not purport to present our results of operations had the
transactions contemplated in this prospectus actually been
completed as of the dates indicated. Furthermore, available cash
from operating surplus as defined in the partnership agreement
is primarily a cash accounting concept, while our pro forma
financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis. As
a result, the amount of pro forma, as adjusted available cash
from operating surplus should only be viewed as a general
indication of the amount of available cash from operating
surplus that we might have generated had we been formed in
earlier periods.
Forecasted Available Cash From Operating Surplus
|
|
|
We believe we will have sufficient available cash from
operating surplus to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on
all units for each quarter through March 31, 2006. |
We believe that, following completion of this offering, we will
have sufficient available cash from operating surplus to allow
us to make the full minimum quarterly distribution on all
outstanding common and subordinated units for each quarter
through March 31, 2006. Our belief is based on a financial
forecast of the expected results of operations and cash flows
for Teekay LNG Partners L.P. for the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006. Our financial forecast presents, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, the expected results of
operations and cash flows for Teekay LNG Partners L.P. for the
forecast period.
Our financial forecast reflects our judgment as of the date of
this prospectus of conditions we expect to exist and the course
of action we expect to take during the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006. The assumptions disclosed on pages 64
through 69 are those that we believe are significant to our
financial forecast. We believe our actual results of operations
and cash flows will approximate those reflected in our financial
forecast; however, we can give you no assurance that our
forecast results will be achieved. There will likely be
differences between our forecast and the actual results and
those differences could be material. If the forecast is not
achieved, we may not be able to pay the full minimum quarterly
distribution or any amount on our common units.
59
Our financial forecast is a forward-looking statement and should
be read together with the historical financial statements and
the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus and
together with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The
financial forecast has been prepared by and is the
responsibility of our management. Ernst & Young LLP,
our independent chartered accountants, has neither examined nor
compiled the accompanying financial forecast information and,
accordingly, Ernst & Young LLP does not express an
opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The
Ernst & Young LLP reports included in this prospectus
relate to historical financial information of Teekay Shipping
Spain, S.L. (formerly Naviera F. Tapias, S.A.), Teekay
Luxembourg, S.a.r.l., Teekay LNG Partners L.P. and
Teekay GP L.L.C. Those reports do not extend to the
financial forecast information and should not be read to do so.
When considering our financial forecast, you should keep in mind
the risk factors and other cautionary statements under the
heading Risk Factors elsewhere in this prospectus.
Any of the risks discussed in this prospectus could cause our
actual results of operations to vary significantly from the
financial forecast.
We are providing the financial forecast to supplement our pro
forma and historical financial statements in support of our
belief that we will have sufficient available cash from
operating surplus to allow us to pay the minimum quarterly
distribution on all of our outstanding common and subordinated
units for each quarter through March 31, 2006. Please read
Note 3: Significant Forecast Assumptions for further
information as to the assumptions we have made for the financial
forecast.
Actual payments of distributions on common units, subordinated
units and the 2% general partner interest are expected to be
$31.7 million for the period between the closing date of
this offering (May 10, 2005) and March 31, 2006. This
is the expected aggregate amount of the minimum quarterly
distribution of $0.4125 per unit per quarter for the
period. These expected actual distributions consist of
$6.9 million for the period from the estimated closing date
of this offering through June 30, 2005 and
$12.4 million for each of the quarters ending
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005. Quarterly
distributions are paid within 45 days after the close of
each quarter. The forecasted payment of distributions on common
units, subordinated units and the 2% general partner interest
for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, which is based on
the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution for that
quarter, is approximately $12.4 million and will be paid in
May 2006.
We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly the
results of any future revisions we may make to the financial
forecast or to update this financial forecast to reflect events
or circumstances after the date of this prospectus. Therefore,
you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this
information.
60
Financial Forecast
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
Statement of Forecasted Consolidated Results of
Operations and Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Ending | |
|
|
March 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
142,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
668 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
31,267 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
43,923 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
84,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
58,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(55,284 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
21,591 |
|
Other loss
|
|
|
(1,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
22,718 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net operating cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
43,923 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(5,139 |
) |
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
(5,649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flows
|
|
|
55,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(40,485 |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
69,500 |
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
76,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flows
|
|
|
105,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from temporary financing facility
|
|
|
40,485 |
|
Prepayment of temporary financing
|
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(8,321 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(84,609 |
) |
Payments of distributions on common units, subordinated units,
and on the 2% general partner interest (please read Note 3)
|
|
|
(31,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flows
|
|
|
(134,144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash from forecasted operating, investing and
financing activities
|
|
$ |
27,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
Please read accompanying summary of significant accounting
policies and forecast assumptions.
61
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Forecast
Assumptions
Note 1: Organization and
Description of Business
Organization. We are a Marshall Islands limited
partnership formed on November 3, 2004 to acquire from
Teekay Shipping Corporation the shares of Teekay Luxembourg
S.a.r.l. and its subsidiaries, which includes Teekay Shipping
Spain, S.L., and the other assets and liabilities described
in this prospectus. Our general partner is Teekay GP
L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation.
We will issue to investors common units, representing limited
partner interests, pursuant to this offering and concurrently
issue common units and subordinated units, representing
additional limited partner interests, to Teekay Shipping
Corporation or its affiliates.
Basis of Presentation. This financial forecast is
as of April 1, 2005 and has been prepared in conjunction
with this offering and reflects only the assets, liabilities and
operations to be contributed by Teekay Shipping Corporation to
us prior to or at the closing of this offering. The financial
forecast presents, to the best of managements knowledge
and belief, our expected results of operations and cash flows
for the twelve months ending March 31, 2006. Accordingly,
the forecast represents managements judgment as of the
date of this prospectus of expected business and industry
conditions for the forecast period. The assumptions disclosed
herein are subject to significant business, economic, regulatory
and competitive risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those forecasted. Please read
Risk Factors included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Description of Business. We are an international
provider of liquefied natural gas (or LNG) and crude oil
marine transportation services. We generate revenues by charging
our customers for the transportation of their products utilizing
our LNG carriers and Suezmax class crude oil tankers.
Note 2: Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. This financial
forecast includes our accounts and those of our wholly owned
subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have
been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reporting Currency. The financial forecast is
stated in U.S. Dollars because we operate in international
shipping markets that typically utilize the U.S. Dollar as
the functional currency. Transactions involving other currencies
during the year are converted into U.S. Dollars using the
exchange rates in effect at the time of the transactions. At the
balance sheet dates, monetary assets and liabilities that are
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar are
translated to reflect the period-end exchange rates. Resulting
gains or losses are reflected in our consolidated statements of
income.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue from
time charters daily over the term of the charter as the
applicable vessel operates under the charter. We do not
recognize revenue during days that the vessel is off-hire.
Estimated losses on voyages are provided for in full at the time
such losses become evident.
Voyage Expenses. Voyage expenses are all expenses
unique to a particular voyage, including any bunker fuel
expenses, port fees, cargo loading and unloading expenses, canal
tolls, agency fees and commissions. Voyage expenses are
typically paid by the customer under time charters and by us
under voyage charters. We recognize voyage expenses ratably over
the duration of the voyage.
Vessel Operating Expenses. We are responsible for
vessel operating expenses, which include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. The two largest
62
components of vessel operating expenses are crews and repairs
and maintenance. We recognize vessel operating expenses when
incurred.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. We classify all highly
liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less
when purchased as cash and cash equivalents.
Vessels and Equipment. All pre-delivery costs
incurred during the construction of newbuildings are
capitalized, including interest, supervision and technical
costs. The acquisition cost and all costs incurred to restore
used vessels purchased to the standard required to properly
service our customers are capitalized. Our vessels are
depreciated to their estimated residual value. Depreciation is
calculated on a straight-line basis over a vessels useful
life. Depreciation is calculated using an estimated useful life
of 25 years for Suezmax tankers and 35 years for LNG
carriers, or a shorter period if regulations are expected to
prevent us from operating the vessels for the 25 years or
35 years, respectively. Depreciation and amortization
includes depreciation on all owned vessels and vessels accounted
for as capital leases.
Generally, we drydock each LNG carrier and Suezmax tanker every
five years. In addition, a shipping society classification
intermediate survey is performed on our LNG carriers between the
second and third year of the five-year drydocking period. We
capitalize a substantial portion of the costs we incur during
drydocking and for the survey expenditures and amortize those
costs on a straight-line basis from the completion of a
drydocking or intermediate survey to the estimated completion of
the next drydocking. We expense costs related to routine repairs
and maintenance incurred during drydocking that do not improve
or extend the useful lives of the assets. When significant
drydocking expenditures occur prior to the expiration of this
period, we expense the remaining unamortized balance of the
original drydocking cost and any unamortized intermediate survey
costs in the month of the subsequent drydocking.
We assess vessels and equipment for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. We measure recoverability of an
asset by comparing its carrying amount to future undiscounted
cash flows that the asset is expected to generate over its
expected remaining useful life. If we consider a vessel or
equipment to be impaired, we recognize impairment in an amount
equal to the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its
fair market value.
Loan Costs. Loan costs, including fees,
commissions and legal expenses associated with the loans, are
presented as other assets and capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the relevant loan.
Amortization of loan costs is included in interest expense.
Derivative Instruments. We utilize derivative
financial instruments to reduce interest rate risks. We do not
hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading
purposes. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (or
SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, which was amended in
June 2000 by SFAS No. 138 and in May 2003 by SFAS
No. 149, establishes accounting and reporting standards for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. It requires that
an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or
liabilities in the statement of financial condition and measure
those instruments at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges
or are not designated as hedges are adjusted to fair value
through income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending upon the
nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the
derivatives are either offset against the fair value of assets,
liabilities or firm commitments through income, or recognized in
other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized
in income. The ineffective portion of a derivatives change
in fair value is immediately recognized into income.
Income Taxes. The income we receive with respect
to our Spanish-flagged vessels is subject to tax in Spain at a
rate of 35%. Our Spanish-flagged vessels are registered in the
Canary Islands Special Ship Registry. Consequently, we are
allowed a credit, equal to 90% of the tax payable on income from
the commercial operation of these vessels, against the tax
otherwise payable. This effectively results in an income tax
rate of approximately 3.5% on income from the operation of our
Spanish-flagged vessels. We account for these taxes using the
liability method pursuant to SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. We may also pay a minimal
amount of tax in Luxembourg, resulting from interest earned on
multi-jurisdictional inter-company loans. Other than the Spanish
income tax and Luxembourg tax, we expect
63
that any other tax liabilities on our income and losses will be
included in the income tax returns of our unitholders. Please
read Business Taxation of the
Partnership.
Intangible Assets. All of our intangible assets
were recognized on April 30, 2004 in connection with Teekay
Shipping Corporations acquisition of Teekay Spain based on
the fair value of the Teekay Spain time charters. These
intangible assets are being amortized over the term of the time
charters.
Note 3: Significant
Forecast Assumptions
Vessel Deliveries and Vessel Sales. The forecast
assumes the following changes in our fleet:
|
|
|
|
|
twelve months operation of the LNG carriers delivered in
July 2004 (Galicia Spirit) and December 2004 (Madrid
Spirit) (collectively, the LNG Deliveries); |
|
|
|
twelve months operation of the Suezmax tanker delivered in
November 2004 (Teide Spirit) and eight months
operation of a newbuilding scheduled for delivery in July 2005
(Toledo Spirit) (collectively, the Suezmax
Deliveries); |
|
|
|
the sale of a Suezmax tanker (Granada Spirit) and the
concurrent sale and leaseback of a Suezmax newbuilding
(Toledo Spirit) in July 2005; and |
|
|
|
the sale of two Suezmax tankers (Sevilla Spirit and
Leon Spirit) in the fourth quarter of 2004 (collectively,
the Suezmax Dispositions). |
Foreign Currency. Although we operate in
international shipping markets, which typically utilize the
U.S. Dollar as the functional currency, a portion of our
voyage revenues, loan repayments, vessel operating expenses,
general and administrative expenses, drydocking expenditures and
interest payments are denominated in Euros. For the purpose of
this forecast, we assume an exchange rate of 1 Euro to
1.3 U.S. Dollars that will not fluctuate in the twelve
months ending March 31, 2006. This exchange rate is based
on spot rates during March 2005. Although fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates have significantly affected our
reported operating results, a substantial portion is unrealized
and the effect on our cash flows has been insignificant. Please
read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Important Financial and Operational Terms and
Concepts Foreign Currency Fluctuations for
further information on our foreign currency exposure.
Voyage Revenues. Forecasted voyage revenues for
the twelve months ending March 31, 2006 are approximately
$18.7 million greater than the historical results for 2004.
The forecasted voyage revenues reflect managements
estimates that are based upon a number of specific assumptions,
including that:
|
|
|
|
|
we will realize increases of $39.6 million and
$11.6 million in voyage revenues from 2004 due to the LNG
deliveries and the Suezmax deliveries, respectively; |
|
|
|
we will realize an increase of $1.3 million in voyage
revenues from 2004 due to the effect on our Euro-denominated
revenue of a change in the average exchange rate of 1 Euro
to 1.24 U.S. Dollars in 2004 to 1 Euro to
1.30 U.S. Dollars used by us in the forecast for the twelve
months ending March 31, 2006; |
|
|
|
we will incur a decrease of $19.2 million in voyage
revenues from 2004 due to the Suezmax Dispositions; and |
|
|
|
we will incur a decrease of $14.6 million in voyage
revenues from 2004 due to the Granada Spirit operating
for four months on a fixed-rate time charter in the twelve
months ending March 31, 2006 compared to operating for a
full year on the spot market in 2004. |
The forecast assumptions are based on estimated average daily
hire rates and the total number of calendar-ship-days our
vessels are expected to operate in the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006. Forecasted voyage revenues for the twelve
months ending March 31, 2006 assumes that three Suezmax
vessels and one LNG carrier will be off-hire while in
drydock for a total of 57 days in the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006, resulting in a reduction of voyage revenues
of $1.9 million had these vessels not
64
undergone drydocking during this period. Among other things, the
amount of actual off-hire time depends upon the time a vessel
spends in drydocking for repairs, maintenance or inspection,
equipment breakdowns or delays due to accidents, crewing
strikes, certain vessel detentions or similar problems as well
as our failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with its
specifications and contractual standards or to provide the
required crew.
Average daily hire rates for each vessel are derived from the
time charters for each vessel. The average daily hire rate is
equal to the voyage revenues earned by a vessel during a given
period, divided by the total number of days the vessel is not
off-hire. In 2004, our two LNG carriers earned an average
daily hire rate of $66,000 per vessel and we have assumed that
these rates will remain substantially unchanged in the twelve
months ending March 31, 2006. Due primarily to the LNG
Deliveries, we expect that the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006 average daily hire rate of our four LNG
carriers will be approximately $68,800 per vessel. In 2004, our
Suezmax tankers earned an average daily hire rate of $31,600 per
vessel. We have assumed the twelve months ending March 31,
2006 average daily hire rate for our Suezmax tankers will
decrease to $23,600 per vessel, due primarily to the relatively
high spot market rates earned by the Granada Spirit
during 2004.
Voyage Expenses. Forecasted voyage expenses for
the twelve months ending March 31, 2006 are approximately
$4.3 million less than the historical results for 2004.
This decrease reflects the change in employment of the
Granada Spirit at the closing of this offering to a
fixed-rate time charter from voyage charters in 2004. Under the
fixed-rate time charter, Teekay Shipping Corporation will pay
voyage expenses; under the voyage charters in 2004, we paid
these expenses. Voyage expenses in the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006 reflect brokerage commissions relating to
our securing long-term time charters.
Vessel Operating Expenses. Forecasted vessel
operating expenses for the twelve months ending March 31,
2006 are approximately $0.6 million greater than the
historical results for 2004. The forecasted increase in vessel
operating expenses results from:
|
|
|
|
|
increases of $5.6 million and $4.3 million from the
LNG Deliveries and Suezmax Deliveries, based on detailed budgets
prepared for each vessel; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.1 million due to the effect on our
Euro-denominated vessel operating expenses of a change in the
average exchange rate of 1 Euro to
1.24 U.S. Dollars in 2004 to 1 Euro to
1.30 U.S. Dollars used by us in the forecast for the
twelve months ending March 31, 2006; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $9.8 million from the Suezmax Dispositions
and the sale of the Granada Spirit, based on historical
expenses for the vessels; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.6 million primarily from forecasted
changes in crew composition and lower insurance rates for
vessels in our fleet during both 2004 and the twelve months
ending March 31, 2006. |
Some of the more significant vessel operating expenses include
crewing and other labor and related costs, repairs and
maintenance and insurance costs. Labor and related costs are
forecasted based upon estimated employee headcount and
contractual unionized wage rates. Insurance costs are estimated
based upon anticipated premiums.
Depreciation and Amortization. Forecasted
depreciation and amortization for the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006 is approximately $9.1 million greater
than the historical results for 2004. Forecasted depreciation
and amortization reflects managements estimates, which are
based upon a number of specific assumptions, including that:
|
|
|
|
|
we will realize total increases of $9.2 million and
$2.7 million in depreciation and amortization from 2004 due
to the LNG Deliveries and the Suezmax Deliveries, respectively; |
|
|
|
we will realize a total increase of $5.0 million in
depreciation and amortization from 2004 due to
(a) increased depreciation resulting from recording the
Teekay Spain vessels at their acquisition |
65
|
|
|
|
|
costs on April 30, 2004 compared to their depreciated value
prior to Teekay Shipping Corporations acquisition of
Teekay Spain on that date, and (b) amortization, as an
intangible asset, of the value of the time charters recognized
in connection with Teekay Shipping Corporations
acquisition of Teekay Spain; and |
|
|
|
we will realize total decreases of $5.8 million and
$2.0 million in depreciation and amortization from 2004 due
to the Suezmax Dispositions and the disposition of the
Granada Spirit, respectively. |
The increases in depreciation and amortization for the LNG
Deliveries and Suezmax Deliveries are based upon
$564.0 million of construction costs for the LNG Deliveries
and $130.4 million of actual and projected construction
costs for the Suezmax Deliveries. Projected construction costs
are based on the remaining amounts owing under our construction
contracts with the shipyards. Depreciation is calculated using
an estimated useful life of 35 years for LNG carriers and
25 years for Suezmax tankers.
The value of the time charters recognized in connection with the
acquisition of Teekay Spain was $183.1 million, which is
being amortized over the remaining terms of the time charters.
The weighted-average amortization period of these time charters
was 19.2 years on April 30, 2004.
General and Administrative Expenses. Forecasted
general and administrative expenses for the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006 are approximately $2.2 million more
than the historical results for 2004.
This increase is based on the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
we will incur approximately $1.6 million of additional
costs associated with services agreements we and certain of our
subsidiaries will enter into with subsidiaries of Teekay
Shipping Corporation and with fees and cost reimbursements of
our general partner. Please read Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Advisory and
Administrative Services Agreements; |
|
|
|
we will incur approximately $1.0 million of additional
expenses as a result of being a publicly traded limited
partnership. These expenses will include costs associated with
annual reports to unitholders, tax return and Schedule K-1
preparation and distribution, investor relations, registrar and
transfer agents fees, incremental director and officer
liability insurance costs and director compensation; |
|
|
|
we will realize an increase of $0.2 million of expenses due
primarily to the change in the exchange rate of 1 Euro to
1.24 U.S. Dollars during 2004 to 1 Euro to
1.30 U.S. Dollars used by us in the forecast for the
twelve months ending March 31, 2006; and |
|
|
|
we will realize a decrease of $0.6 million of expenses due
to the sale of a yacht prior to Teekay Shipping
Corporations acquisition of Teekay Spain in 2004. |
Although our general partner anticipates making awards under the
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan sometime during the twelve months
ending March 31, 2006, our general partner has not at this
time established the types or amounts of awards (other than the
amount of awards for non-management directors) and does not have
an estimate of expenses that may be associated with the Plan.
Therefore, we have not included in the forecast possible
expenses associated with the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
In addition, we may pay Teekay Shipping Corporation
incentive fees pursuant to an omnibus agreement with
it to reward and motivate Teekay Shipping Corporation for
pursuing LNG projects that we may elect to undertake. We have
not included the incentive fees in the forecast because their
payment is subject to the sole discretion of the conflicts
committee of our general partners board of directors and
the committee has not made any determination to pay any
incentive fees, and has not determined the timing or amount of
or the criteria for any incentive fees.
Interest Expense. Forecasted interest expense for
the twelve months ending March 31, 2006 is approximately
$6.8 million less than historical results from 2004. This
decrease is based on the following assumptions:
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will realize a decrease of $14.7 million in interest
expense from 2004 due primarily to the absence of interest on
certain debt and interest rate swaps as a result of the
prepayments that will occur in connection with this offering and
repayments of debt from the proceeds of the Suezmax
Dispositions, partially offset by interest on the debt used to
finance the LNG Deliveries and Suezmax Deliveries. The amounts
of debt associated with the LNG Deliveries, Suezmax Deliveries,
Suezmax Dispositions and debt prepayments are
$398.3 million, $100.0 million, $39.8 million and
$338.5 million, respectively. In 2004, our average debt
balance (excluding debt on vessels under construction and the
capital leases for two LNG carriers) was approximately
$805.7 million, with interest rates between 1.6% and 8.2%
on various financing facilities. Interest on debt on vessels
under construction is capitalized and, therefore, excluded.
Interest expense in 2004 included approximately
$0.6 million for the amortization of capitalized financing
fees. Our forecast is based on capitalized loan costs of
approximately $4.9 million, which are being amortized over
a weighted-average amortization period of 20 years. Our
forecast is based on the assumption that we will have an average
debt balance (excluding debt on vessels under construction and
the capital leases for two LNG carriers) of $651.3 million
during the twelve months ending March 31, 2006, with an
estimated weighted average interest rate of 5.3% per annum. This
rate is based upon the weighted-average effective interest rate
of our term loans and the interest rate implicit in our capital
leases (excluding the two LNG carriers mentioned below) after
giving effect to our interest rate hedges. We expect to have an
average debt balance of $4.4 million for vessels under
construction during the twelve months ending March 31, 2006
and expect to capitalize $0.1 million of interest on this
debt based on an interest rate of 2.7%; and |
|
|
|
|
we will realize an increase of $7.9 million in interest
expense from 2004 due to the delivery of one LNG carrier in
December 2004, partially offset by lower interest expense
resulting from scheduled debt repayments on a second LNG carrier
which delivered in August 2003. These vessels have been financed
pursuant to Spanish tax lease arrangements. This increase is
directly offset by a corresponding increase in interest income
from restricted cash (discussed below). Under these lease
arrangements, we borrow under term loans and deposit the
proceeds into restricted cash accounts and enter into capital
leases for the vessels. Our forecast is based on an average
capital lease balance of $380.5 million during the twelve
months ending March 31, 2006 and a weighted-average
interest rate implicit in the capital leases of 5.7%. |
Although we recently entered into a $100 million revolving
credit facility, we do not anticipate that we will draw on the
facility during the twelve months ending March 31, 2006.
Please read our unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for further
information.
Interest Income. Forecasted interest income for
the twelve months ending March 31, 2006 is approximately
$0.5 million less than the interest income for 2004.
Interest income primarily reflects interest earned on restricted
cash deposits that approximate the present value of the
remaining amounts we owe under lease arrangements on two of our
LNG carriers. The decrease from 2004 reflects restricted cash
withdrawals of $76.3 million in December 2004 and
$100.2 million in December 2005 that will be used to make
scheduled repayments of capital lease obligations (including
accrued interest), partially offset by additional deposits of
$54.5 million made during December 2004.
Other Loss. The forecast includes
$1.6 million of other loss from estimated income taxes on
operating activities.
Income Taxes. The forecast includes the payment of
$5.1 million of income taxes from the sale of the
Santiago Spirit, which was completed during March 2005.
Expenditures for Drydocking. Forecasted
expenditures for drydocking of approximately $5.6 million
represent our estimated costs to drydock three Suezmax tankers
and one LNG carrier during the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006. These drydocking costs are based upon our
estimate of the required work
67
that will be performed for a given vessel and have been
amortized on a straight-line basis from completion of drydocking
for that vessel to the estimated completion of its next
drydocking. Generally, we drydock each LNG carrier and Suezmax
tanker every five years. Accordingly, the related annual
amortization expense is expected to be approximately
$1.1 million for our scheduled drydockings in the twelve
months ending March 31, 2006.
Expenditures for Vessels and Equipment. Forecasted
expenditures for vessels and equipment represent remaining
contractual construction payments for building the Toledo
Spirit, capitalized interest and other miscellaneous
construction costs relating to this vessel.
Proceeds from Disposition of Vessels and Equipment.
Forecasted disposition proceeds represent
$19.5 million of expected proceeds from the sale of the
Granada Spirit and $50.0 million of expected
proceeds from the sale and leaseback of the Toledo
Spirit. Teekay Shipping Corporation has agreed to purchase
the Granada Spirit no later than upon delivery to us of
our Suezmax newbuilding, the Toledo Spirit, scheduled for
July 2005.
Decrease in Restricted Cash. Forecasted decrease
in restricted cash primarily represents $78.3 million of
Euro-denominated cash deposits that will be used for capital
lease payments on two LNG carriers. Please read Scheduled
Repayments of Capital Lease Obligations below.
Net Proceeds from Temporary Financing. The
forecast assumes that all remaining construction costs for the
Toledo Spirit are financed with an existing temporary
financing facility.
Prepayments of Temporary Financing. The forecast
assumes that the proceeds from the sale and leaseback of the
Toledo Spirit are used to prepay the existing temporary
financing facility used to finance the construction of that
vessel.
Scheduled Repayments of Long-term Debt. Forecasted
repayments of long-term debt are based on the terms of debt
facilities expected to be in place for the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006. Upon completion of this offering,
forecasted repayments are projected to be $6.4 million less
than repayments scheduled for the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006 for long-term debt outstanding at December
31, 2004. This decrease is due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The repayment of $338.5 million of term loans relating to
two LNG carriers with the proceeds of the contribution and loans
from Teekay Shipping Corporation, which term loans had aggregate
scheduled repayments of $6.5 million during the twelve
months ending March 31, 2006; |
|
|
|
|
|
An estimated $10.0 million interest bearing loan from
Teekay Shipping Corporation made subsequent to December 31,
2004 and prior to the closing of this offering, the proceeds of
which will be used to partially repay term loans relating to two
LNG carriers. This loan is forecasted to have scheduled
repayments of $0.2 million during the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006; and |
|
|
|
|
The change in the exchange rate of 1 Euro to
1.3621 U.S. dollars at December 31, 2004 to
1 Euro to 1.30 U.S. dollars used by us in the
forecast for the twelve months ending March 31, 2006, which
decreased the forecasted scheduled repayments of long-term debt
on Euro-denominated term loans by $0.2 million in the
twelve months ending March 31, 2006. |
Please read our unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for further
information.
Scheduled Repayments of Capital Lease Obligations.
Forecasted repayments of capital lease obligations are
based on the terms of existing capital leases for five Suezmax
tankers ($6.3 million) and two LNG carriers
($78.3 million Euro-denominated) and are
projected to be $0.8 million more and $3.7 million
less, respectively, than repayments scheduled for the twelve
months ending March 31, 2006
68
for capital lease obligations outstanding at December 31,
2004. This increase and this decrease are due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The delivery of the Toledo Spirit, which increased
scheduled repayments by $0.8 million; and |
|
|
|
The change in the exchange rate of 1 Euro to
1.3621 U.S. dollars at December 31, 2004 to
1 Euro to 1.30 U.S. dollars used by us in the
forecast for the twelve months ending March 31, 2006, which
decreased the forecasted scheduled repayments of capital lease
obligations on Euro-denominated LNG carrier capital lease
obligations by $3.7 million for this twelve-month period. |
The lease payments required for the LNG carriers are in Euros
and will be paid from existing Euro-denominated restricted cash
deposits.
Payments of Distributions on Common Units, Subordinated
Units and the 2% General Partner Interest. Forecasted
payments of distributions on common units, subordinated units
and on the 2% general partner interest include an estimated
$6.9 million distribution for the period from the closing
date of the offering (May 10, 2005) through June 30,
2005 plus the payment of $12.4 million for quarters ending
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005, resulting in
an aggregate distribution of $31.7 million. Quarterly
distributions are paid within 45 days after the close of
each quarter. The forecasted payment of distributions on common
units, subordinated units and the 2% general partner interest
for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, which is based on
the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution for that
quarter, are approximately $12.4 million and will be paid
in May 2006.
Net Increase in Cash From Forecasted Operating, Investing
and Financing Activities. The net increase in cash of
approximately $27.6 million from forecasted operating,
investing and financing activities represents cash that would be
available to pay distributions in respect of the twelve months
ending March 31, 2006. The forecasted increase in cash is
attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash provided by operating activities of $55.8 million; plus |
|
|
|
|
cash provided by investing activities of $105.9 million,
which is primarily attributable to the construction and sale and
leaseback of the Toledo Spirit and the sale of the
Granada Spirit; less |
|
|
|
|
cash used in financing activities of $134.1 million, which
results from debt repayments and prepayments and distributions
made to unitholders offset by net proceeds from long-term debt. |
|
Forecast of Available Cash
From Operating Surplus
The following table sets forth our calculation of forecasted
available cash from operating surplus for the twelve months
ending March 31, 2006 based on the statement of forecasted
results of operations and cash flows set forth above. This
calculation represents available cash from operating surplus
generated during the period (excluding any cash from working
capital borrowings, cash on hand on the closing date of this
offering and $10 million that are included in the
cumulative calculation of operating surplus under our
partnership agreement). As described in Cash Distribution
Policy, cash from these sources may also be used to pay
distributions. Available cash from operating surplus is defined
in our partnership agreement and is different from net cash
provided by or used in operating, investing and financing
activities. For instance, in calculating available cash from
operating surplus, our partnership agreement requires us to
subtract an estimate of the average annual maintenance capital
expenditures necessary to maintain the operating capacity of our
capital assets over the long-term as opposed to the actual
amounts spent.
69
Our calculation of available cash from operating surplus is
derived from the terms of our partnership agreement and forms
the basis for the amount that we distribute. The amount of
available cash from operating surplus as so calculated may be
more than the amount of cash actually distributed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted | |
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Ending | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
22,718 |
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
43,923 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
55,284 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(21,591 |
) |
|
Income tax expense(1)
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated maintenance capital expenditures(2)
|
|
|
16,412 |
|
|
Unrestricted cash interest paid(3)
|
|
|
34,081 |
|
|
Unrestricted interest received(3)
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
Income taxes paid(4)
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forecast of available cash from operating surplus(5)
|
|
$ |
50,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Income tax expense is categorized as other loss on
our forecast and historical financial statements. |
|
(2) |
Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct
from operating surplus each quarter estimated maintenance
capital expenditures as opposed to actual maintenance capital
expenditures in order to reduce disparities in operating surplus
caused by fluctuating maintenance capital expenditures, such as
drydocking and vessel replacement. Because of the substantial
capital expenditures we are required to make to maintain our
fleet, our initial annual estimated maintenance capital
expenditures for purposes of calculating operating surplus will
be $16.4 million per year, which is comprised of
$4.4 million for drydocking costs for all of our vessels
and $12.0 million, including financing costs, for replacing
our vessels in our fleet at the end of their useful lives. The
actual cost of replacing our LNG carriers and Suezmax tankers
will depend a number of factors, including prevailing market
conditions, charter rates and the availability and cost of
financing at the time of replacement. The board of directors of
our general partner with the approval of its conflicts committee
may determine to increase the annual amount of our estimated
maintenance capital expenditures. In years when estimated
maintenance capital expenditures are higher than actual
maintenance capital expenditures, the amount of cash available
for distribution to unitholders will be lower than if actual
maintenance capital expenditures were deducted from operating
surplus. |
|
(3) |
Under certain capital lease arrangements, we maintain restricted
cash deposits that, together with interest, will equal the
remaining amounts we owe under the capital leases. The interest
we receive from those deposits is used solely to pay interest
associated with the capital leases, and the amount of interest
we receive approximates the amount of interest we pay on the
capital leases. Since these amounts essentially offset each
other, we exclude both the restricted interest received and the
related interest paid from our calculation of our forecasted
available cash for operating surplus. |
|
(4) |
Excludes the payment by us of taxes associated with asset
dispositions and our restructuring for this offering, both of
which are excluded from the definition of available cash from
operating surplus in our partnership agreement. |
70
|
|
(5) |
The amount of available cash from operating surplus needed to
distribute the minimum quarterly distributions for four quarters
on the common units and subordinated units to be outstanding
immediately after this offering and on the 2% general partner
interest is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four Quarters | |
|
|
Ending | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Common units
|
|
$ |
24,312 |
|
Subordinated units
|
|
|
24,312 |
|
General partner interest
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
49,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
71
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL AND OPERATING
DATA
The following table presents, in each case for the periods and
as of the dates indicated, selected:
|
|
|
|
|
historical financial and operating data of Teekay Shipping Spain
S.L. (or Teekay Spain), which was named Naviera F.
Tapias S.A. (or Tapias) prior to its acquisition by
Teekay Shipping Corporation through its subsidiary, Teekay
Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (or Luxco), on April 30, 2004;
and |
|
|
|
pro forma financial and operating data of Teekay LNG
Partners L.P. |
The selected historical financial and operating data has been
prepared on the following basis:
|
|
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain
excludes financial information related to three businesses
previously held in separate subsidiaries and unrelated to the
marine transportation of LNG and crude oil, which were disposed
of prior to Teekay Shipping Corporations acquisition of
Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 and
the four months ended April 30, 2004 are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of Teekay Spain
included elsewhere in this prospectus; |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at and for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 are
derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of
Teekay Spain, which are not included in this prospectus; and |
|
|
|
the historical financial and operating data of Teekay Spain as
at December 31, 2004 and for the eight months ended
December 31, 2004 reflect the acquisition of Teekay Spain
by Teekay Shipping Corporation and are derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements of Teekay Spain included
elsewhere in this prospectus. |
The unaudited pro forma financial and operating data of Teekay
LNG Partners L.P. give pro forma effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
the contribution by Teekay Shipping Corporation to us of the
capital stock and notes receivable of Luxco; |
|
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporations loans and contributions to
us, which we used, together with existing cash, to repay
indebtedness and settle interest rate swaps as described in
Use of Proceeds; |
|
|
|
|
the completion of this offering; and |
|
|
|
the use of the net proceeds of this offering, as described in
Use of Proceeds. |
The pro forma financial data presented as at and for the year
ended December 31, 2004 are derived from our unaudited pro
forma consolidated financial statements. The pro forma income
statement data for the year ended December 31, 2004 assumes
this offering and related transactions occurred on
January 1, 2004. The pro forma balance sheet data assumes
this offering and related transactions occurred at
December 31, 2004. A more complete explanation of the pro
forma data can be found in our unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements included with this prospectus.
The following table presents two financial measures, net voyage
revenues and EBITDA, which we use in our business. These
financial measures are not calculated or presented in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (or
GAAP). We explain these measures below and reconcile them
to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated
and presented in accordance with GAAP in
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
Because drydocking expenditures are more extensive in nature
than normal routine maintenance, we capitalize and amortize them
for a given vessel from the completion of a drydocking to the
estimated completion of the next drydocking. For more
information about our accounting treatment of drydocking
72
expenditures, please read Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Important Financial and Operational Terms
and Concepts Drydocking and
Depreciation and Amortization.
To make the selected historical financial and operating data
more comparable, our historical operating results and related
discussion below do not include the historical results of Luxco
for the nine months ended December 31, 2004. In the nine
months ended December 31, 2004, Luxco had no revenues,
expenses or income, or assets or liabilities, other than:
|
|
|
|
|
$465.7 million of advances (including accrued interest)
from Teekay Shipping Corporation that were used by Luxco to
purchase Teekay Spain and will be used by Luxco to prepay
certain debt of Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
$9.8 million of net interest expense related to the
advances; |
|
|
|
$44.7 million of unrealized foreign exchange losses related
to the advances, which are Euro-denominated; |
|
|
|
$1.1 million in other expenses; |
|
|
|
$2.2 million in cash and cash equivalents; and |
|
|
|
its ownership interest in Teekay Spain and certain purchase
rights and obligations for Suezmax tankers operated by Teekay
Spain under capital lease arrangements, which it acquired from
Teekay Spain on December 30, 2004. |
We believe the exclusion of the Luxco results make our results
more comparable because Luxcos results and financial
position relate solely to the financing of the acquisition of
Teekay Spain and repayment of Teekay Spain debt by Teekay
Shipping Corporation and do not relate to the historical results
of Teekay Spain. In addition, because the capital stock of Luxco
and the $465.7 million of advances will be contributed to
us upon the closing of this offering, these advances and their
related effects will be eliminated on consolidation, as
reflected in our selected pro forma financial data. For more
information on Luxco, please read the unaudited consolidated
financial statements of Luxco included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
73
The following table should be read together with, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the historical and
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
table should be read together with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
Year | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except per unit and fleet data) | |
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
52,217 |
|
|
$ |
60,326 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses(1)
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
Vessel operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
10,883 |
|
|
|
12,403 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
|
|
30,617 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,803 |
|
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
|
37,808 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,967 |
|
|
|
5,061 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
7,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
33,957 |
|
|
|
38,650 |
|
|
|
45,628 |
|
|
|
63,540 |
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
53,980 |
|
|
|
80,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
14,238 |
|
|
|
23,169 |
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
29,135 |
|
|
|
42,998 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(15,625 |
) |
|
|
(20,104 |
) |
|
|
(18,109 |
) |
|
|
(34,862 |
) |
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
(40,560 |
) |
|
|
(33,343 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
8,431 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
13,426 |
|
|
|
22,211 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)(3)
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
3,462 |
|
|
|
(44,310 |
) |
|
|
(71,502 |
) |
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
(34,149 |
) |
|
|
(16,139 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,618 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
Other income (loss)(5)
|
|
|
3,615 |
|
|
|
5,327 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
(17,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before change in accounting principle
|
|
|
7,349 |
|
|
|
6,495 |
|
|
|
(113,770 |
) |
|
|
(59,432 |
) |
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
(28,787 |
) |
|
|
(2,334 |
) |
Change in accounting principle(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
7,349 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per unit
(basic and diluted)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Balance Sheet Data
(at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities
|
|
$ |
24,185 |
|
|
$ |
24,625 |
|
|
$ |
20,141 |
|
|
$ |
22,533 |
|
|
$ |
11,289 |
|
|
$ |
154,203 |
|
|
$ |
21,562 |
|
Restricted cash deposits(8)
|
|
|
29,243 |
|
|
|
70,051 |
|
|
|
106,399 |
|
|
|
398,038 |
|
|
|
385,564 |
|
|
|
435,112 |
|
|
|
435,112 |
|
Vessels and equipment(9)
|
|
|
277,076 |
|
|
|
368,951 |
|
|
|
705,010 |
|
|
|
602,550 |
|
|
|
602,055 |
|
|
|
813,431 |
|
|
|
1,068,916 |
|
Total assets(8)
|
|
|
357,247 |
|
|
|
491,058 |
|
|
|
882,604 |
|
|
|
1,069,081 |
|
|
|
1,021,695 |
|
|
|
1,651,522 |
|
|
|
1,766,764 |
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations(8)(10)
|
|
|
317,710 |
|
|
|
444,865 |
|
|
|
882,027 |
|
|
|
1,129,426 |
|
|
|
1,072,379 |
|
|
|
1,200,499 |
|
|
|
1,059,662 |
|
Total stockholders/partners equity (deficit)
|
|
|
34,673 |
|
|
|
29,849 |
|
|
|
(106,105 |
) |
|
|
(164,809 |
) |
|
|
(144,186 |
) |
|
|
184,650 |
|
|
|
687,451 |
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
19,695 |
|
|
$ |
24,770 |
|
|
$ |
20,418 |
|
|
$ |
18,318 |
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
7,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
31,852 |
|
|
|
176,316 |
|
|
|
(277,616 |
) |
|
|
(25,846 |
) |
|
|
95,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(23,304 |
) |
|
|
(55,695 |
) |
|
|
(199,218 |
) |
|
|
262,766 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
39,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
47,913 |
|
|
$ |
55,234 |
|
|
$ |
54,532 |
|
|
$ |
81,798 |
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
|
$ |
80,025 |
|
|
$ |
118,901 |
|
EBITDA(11)
|
|
|
36,556 |
|
|
|
33,912 |
|
|
|
(81,056 |
) |
|
|
(6,578 |
) |
|
|
36,887 |
|
|
|
24,571 |
|
|
|
47,476 |
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
173,186 |
|
|
|
110,097 |
|
|
|
186,755 |
|
|
|
133,628 |
|
|
|
5,522 |
|
|
|
83,703 |
|
|
|
89,225 |
|
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
4,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
LNG Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Suezmax Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-ship-days(12)
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
Average age of our fleet (in years at end of period)
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Vessels at end of period
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
74
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage,
including any bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and
unloading expenses, canal tolls, agency fees and commissions. |
|
|
(2) |
Vessel operating expenses include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. |
|
|
(3) |
Substantially all of these foreign currency exchange gains and
losses were unrealized and not settled in cash. Under
U.S. accounting guidelines, all foreign
currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities, such as
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, restricted cash,
accounts payable, long-term debt and capital lease obligations,
are revalued and reported based on the prevailing exchange rate
at the end of the period. Our primary source for the foreign
currency gains and losses is our Euro-denominated term loans,
which totaled 294.8 million Euros ($372.4 million) as
at December 31, 2003 and 325.8 million Euros
($443.7 million) at December 31, 2004. |
|
|
(4) |
We have entered into interest rate swaps to hedge our interest
rate risk from our floating-rate debt used to purchase our LNG
carriers. These interest rate swaps were not designated as
hedges under U.S. accounting guidelines until
April 30, 2004. Consequently, the changes in the fair
values of these swaps that occurred during periods prior to
April 30, 2004 have been recorded in earnings as
interest rate swaps gain (loss) for those periods.
Had these interest rate swaps been designated as hedges prior to
2003, any subsequent changes in fair value would have been
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) to the extent the hedge was effective and until the
hedged item was recognized as income. |
|
|
|
(5) |
The $10.9 million other loss in the four months ended
April 30, 2004 primarily resulted from a $11.9 million
loss on the sale of non-shipping assets by Teekay Spain prior to
its April 30, 2004 acquisition by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. The $17.2 million other loss in the pro forma
year ended December 31, 2004 primarily resulted from the
$11.9 million loss on sale of non-shipping assets and from
a write-down of capitalized loan costs on a pro forma basis. |
|
|
|
(6) |
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (or
SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, which establishes new standards
for recording derivatives in interim and annual financial
statements. We adopted SFAS 133 on January 1, 2001. We
recognized the fair value of our derivatives as liabilities of
$4.4 million on our consolidated balance sheet as of
January 1, 2001. This amount was recorded as a change in
accounting principle in our consolidated statement of income for
the year ended December 31, 2001. |
|
|
(7) |
Please read Note 5 of our unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus for a
calculation of our pro forma net loss per unit. |
|
|
(8) |
We operate two of our LNG carriers under Spanish tax
lease arrangements. Under these arrangements, we borrow
under term loans and deposit the proceeds into restricted cash
accounts. Concurrently, we enter into capital leases for the
vessels, and the vessels are recorded as assets on our balance
sheet. The restricted cash deposits, plus the interest earned on
the deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the
capital lease arrangements, including our obligations to
purchase the vessels at the end of the lease term. Therefore,
the payments under our capital leases are fully funded through
our restricted cash deposits, and our continuing obligation is
the repayment of the term loans. However, under GAAP we record
both the obligations under the capital leases and the term loans
as liabilities, and both the restricted cash deposits and our
vessels under capital leases as assets. This accounting
treatment has the effect of overstating our assets and
liabilities by the amount of restricted cash deposits relating
to the corresponding capital lease obligations. As at
December 31, 2004, historically and on a pro forma basis,
our total assets and total debt each included
$413.3 million of such amount. |
|
|
(9) |
Vessels and equipment consist of (a) our vessels, at cost
less accumulated depreciation, (b) vessels under capital
leases, at cost less accumulated depreciation, and
(c) advances on our newbuildings. |
75
|
|
(10) |
Total debt for Teekay Spain as at December 31, 2004
excludes a loan made to it in December 2004 of 82.1 million
Euros ($111.8 million) by Teekay Spains direct parent
company, Teekay Spain, S.L., a subsidiary of Luxco. Teekay Spain
will use these funds to repay debt associated with two of its
LNG carriers. |
|
(11) |
EBITDA is calculated as net income(loss) before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as set forth under
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
EBITDA includes our foreign currency exchange and interest rate
swap gains and losses, substantially all of which were
unrealized, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
Year | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
3,462 |
|
|
$ |
(44,310 |
) |
|
$ |
(71,502 |
) |
|
$ |
18,010 |
|
|
$ |
(34,149 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,139 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,618 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,156 |
) |
|
$ |
(115,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,787 |
) |
|
$ |
21,995 |
|
|
$ |
(34,149 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12) |
Calendar-ship-days are equal to the aggregate number of calendar
days in a period that our vessels operate during that period. |
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Consistent with general practice in the shipping industry, we
use net voyage revenues (defined as voyage revenues less voyage
expenses) as a measure of equating revenues generated from
voyage charters to revenues generated from time charters, which
assists us in making operating decisions about the deployment of
our vessels and their performance. Under time charters the
charterer pays the voyage expenses, whereas under voyage charter
contracts the ship owner pays the voyage expenses. Some voyage
expenses are fixed, and the remainder can be estimated. If we,
as the ship owner, pay the voyage expenses, we typically pass
the approximate amount of these expenses on to our customers by
charging higher rates under the contract or billing the expenses
to them. As a result, although voyage revenues from different
types of contracts may vary, the net revenues after subtracting
voyage expenses, which we call net voyage revenues, are
comparable across the different types of contracts. We
principally use net voyage revenues, a non-GAAP financial
measure, because it provides more meaningful information to us
than voyage revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. Net voyage revenues are also widely used by
investors and analysts in the shipping industry for comparing
financial performance between companies in the shipping industry
to industry averages.
The following table reconciles our net voyage revenues with our
voyage revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
Year | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
52,217 |
|
|
$ |
60,326 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
47,913 |
|
|
$ |
55,234 |
|
|
$ |
54,532 |
|
|
$ |
81,798 |
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
|
$ |
80,025 |
|
|
$ |
118,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by management
and by external users of our financial statements, such as
investors, as discussed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Financial and operating performance. EBITDA allows us to
measure the financial and operating performance of our assets
without regard to financing methods, capital structure or
historical cost basis. For instance, our net income is affected
by whether we finance assets or operations with debt or equity
and by changing interest rates. Likewise, our net income is
affected by how much we pay for an asset and that assets
depreciation or amortization schedule. By reviewing our earnings
before the impact of interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, we, our investors and others can understand the
performance of our assets and operations on a more comparable
basis from period to period and against the performance of other
companies in our industry. |
|
|
|
Liquidity. EBITDA allows us to assess the ability of our
assets to generate cash sufficient to service debt, make
distributions to our unitholders and undertake capital
expenditures. For example, reviewing our earnings before the
impact of non-cash depreciation and amortization charges, and
before the payment of interest on debt we incur, provides us an
understanding of how much cash is available to pay interest. |
EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income,
operating income, cash flow from operating activities or any
other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented in
accordance with GAAP. EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items
that affect net income and operating income, and these measures
may vary among other companies. Therefore, EBITDA as presented
below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of
other companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Four | |
|
Eight | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
Year | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
7,349 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,334 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,803 |
|
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
|
37,808 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
14,347 |
|
|
|
16,352 |
|
|
|
12,861 |
|
|
|
26,431 |
|
|
|
12,783 |
|
|
|
27,134 |
|
|
|
11,132 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
36,556 |
|
|
$ |
33,912 |
|
|
$ |
(81,056 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,578 |
) |
|
$ |
36,887 |
|
|
$ |
24,571 |
|
|
$ |
47,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net operating
cash flow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow
|
|
$ |
19,695 |
|
|
$ |
24,470 |
|
|
$ |
20,418 |
|
|
$ |
18,318 |
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
7,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
4,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
14,347 |
|
|
|
16,352 |
|
|
|
12,861 |
|
|
|
26,431 |
|
|
|
12,783 |
|
|
|
27,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain(loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
(11,837 |
) |
|
|
3,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in working capital
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
(5,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps gain(loss) and change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,984 |
) |
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) and other, net
|
|
|
(3,196 |
) |
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
(44,156 |
) |
|
|
(72,093 |
) |
|
|
18,059 |
|
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
36,556 |
|
|
$ |
33,912 |
|
|
$ |
(81,056 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,578 |
) |
|
$ |
36,887 |
|
|
$ |
24,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our financial
condition and results of operations in conjunction with the
consolidated audited financial statements and related notes of
Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. and the unaudited pro forma
consolidated financial statements and related notes of Teekay
LNG Partners L.P. included elsewhere in this prospectus. Among
other things, those financial statements include more detailed
information regarding the basis of presentation for the
following information. The financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (or GAAP) and are presented in U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated. Any amounts converted from Euros or
another non-U.S. currency to U.S. Dollars in this prospectus are
at the rate applicable at the relevant date, or the average rate
during the applicable period.
Overview
We are an international provider of liquefied natural gas (or
LNG) and crude oil marine transportation services. We
manage our business and analyze and report our results of
operations on the basis of the following two business segments:
|
|
|
LNG Carrier Segment. We have four LNG carriers,
including one vessel delivered in July 2004 and one vessel
delivered in December 2004. We have contracted to acquire from
Teekay Shipping Corporation all of its interest (which will not
be less than 70%) in three LNG newbuilding carriers upon the
delivery of the first carrier, which is scheduled for the fourth
quarter of 2006. The remaining two carriers are scheduled for
delivery in the first half of 2007. The three LNG carriers to be
acquired from Teekay Shipping Corporation will commence service
under existing charters with Ras Laffan Natural Gas Co.
Limited (II) (or RasGas II), a joint
venture between Qatar Petroleum and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc.,
a subsidiary of ExxonMobil Corporation, established for the
purpose of expanding LNG production in Qatar. In 2003 and 2004,
this segment generated 39.7% and 49.7%, respectively, of our
total net voyage revenues. |
|
|
Suezmax Tanker Segment. We have five Suezmax
tankers. In the third quarter of 2005, we expect to take
delivery of a new Suezmax tanker (the Toledo Spirit) and,
if not sold earlier, concurrently sell to Teekay Shipping
Corporation our only single-hulled Suezmax tanker (the
Granada Spirit). Upon delivery of the Toledo
Spirit, all of our Suezmax tankers will operate under
long-term, fixed-rate time charters. In 2003 and through most of
2004, we had six Suezmax tankers. This segment generated 60.3%
and 50.3%, respectively, of our total net voyage revenues in
2003 and 2004. |
Although our Suezmax tanker segment has accounted for a majority
of our voyage revenues, we expect to earn a substantial majority
of our revenues from our LNG carrier segment following delivery
of all of our LNG newbuildings. In addition, our growth strategy
focuses on expanding our fleet of LNG carriers under long-term,
fixed-rate time charters. We view our Suezmax tanker fleet
primarily as a source of stable cash flow as we expand our LNG
operations.
Our fleet was established by Naviera F. Tapias S.A. (or
Tapias), a Spanish company founded in 1991. Teekay
Shipping Corporation, through its subsidiary Teekay Luxembourg
S.a.r.l., acquired Tapias on April 30, 2004 and changed its
name to Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. (or Teekay Spain).
We generate revenues by charging customers for the
transportation of their LNG and crude oil using our vessels.
Historically, we generally have provided these services under
the following basic types of contractual relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
Time charters, where vessels are chartered to customers for a
fixed period of time at rates that are generally fixed but may
contain a variable component, such as an inflation adjustment or
a current market rate component; and |
78
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage charters, which are charters for shorter intervals,
usually a single round trip, that are priced on a current, or
spot, market rate. |
During 2003 and 2004, we derived 85.0% and 84.3% of our revenues
from time charters and 15.0% and 15.7% of our revenues from
voyage charters, respectively. During these periods, all our
vessels were employed on long-term time charters, except the
Granada Spirit, which operated under voyage charters in
the spot market. The Granada Spirit will operate under a
short-term, fixed-rate time charter to an affiliate of Teekay
Shipping Corporation upon the closing of this offering. We do
not anticipate earning revenues from voyage charters in the
foreseeable future.
The average remaining term of our existing long-term, fixed-rate
time charters is approximately 20 years for our LNG
carriers and 16 years for our Suezmax tankers, subject, in
certain circumstances, to termination or purchase rights. The
initial term of each of our LNG and Suezmax newbuilding charters
is 20 years from delivery of the vessel.
Generally, under our current charters the rate we charge for our
services, which we call the hire rate,
includes two components a capital component and an
operating component.
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Component. The capital component typically
approximates the amounts we are required to pay under vessel
financing obligations, including under bareboat charters
included in capital lease arrangements. The capital component of
our long-term Suezmax time charters fluctuates with the floating
interest rates for the debt used to finance the related vessels.
If interest rates increase, the amount we pay under the capital
leases relating to the chartered vessels increases by the amount
of the additional interest payments, and the capital component
we receive from the related time charters correspondingly
increases. Consequently, the fluctuating portion of the capital
component has no net effect on our cash flows or net income, but
does affect our recorded voyage revenues and interest expense.
The capital component of our LNG time charters is fixed. |
|
|
|
Operating Component. The operating component is
intended to compensate us for voyage and vessel operating
expenses and adjusts for inflation. This component is
established at the beginning of the charter and then typically
fluctuates annually based on changes in a specified
cost-of-living index. |
For our charters, other than the RasGas II charters, we
earn a profit from a margin built into the operating component.
Under the RasGas II charters, this margin is built into the
capital component.
In addition, we may receive additional revenues beyond the fixed
hire rate when current market rates exceed certain amounts under
the terms of one of our Suezmax time charters.
Hire payments may be reduced or, under some charters, we must
pay liquidated damages, if the vessel does not perform to
certain of its specifications, such as if the average vessel
speed falls below a guaranteed speed or the amount of fuel
consumed to power the vessel under normal circumstances exceeds
a guaranteed amount. Historically, we have had few instances of
hire rate reductions and none that have had a material impact on
our operating results.
When the vessel is off-hire or not
available for service the customer generally is not
required to pay the hire rate and we are responsible for all
costs. Prolonged off-hire may lead to vessel substitution or
termination of the time charter. A vessel generally will be
deemed off-hire if there is a loss of time due to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
operational deficiencies; drydocking for repairs, maintenance or
inspection; equipment breakdowns; or delays due to accidents,
crewing strikes, certain vessel detentions or similar problems;
or |
|
|
|
our failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with its
specifications and contractual standards or to provide the
required crew. |
For more information on our charters, please read
Business Time Charter Contracts
General Provisions, LNG Time
Charters and Crude Oil Time
Charters.
79
|
|
|
Important Financial and Operational Terms and
Concepts |
We use a variety of financial and operational terms and concepts
when analyzing our performance. These include the following:
Voyage Revenues. Voyage revenues include revenues
from time charters and voyage charters. Voyage revenues are
affected by hire rates and the number of calendar-ship-days a
vessel operates. Voyage revenues are also affected by the mix of
business between time and voyage charters. Hire rates for voyage
charters are more volatile, as they are typically tied to
prevailing market rates at the time of a voyage. We do not
anticipate earning revenues from voyage charters in the
foreseeable future. However, we may earn additional revenues
from a component in one of our Suezmax time charters, which
provides for additional hire payments above the fixed-rate
component when current market rates exceed certain amounts.
Assuming our newbuildings are delivered as scheduled,
incremental voyage revenues under long-term, fixed-rate time
charters for these vessels will be added at various times
through the first half of 2007, as voyages commence under the
related time charters.
Voyage Expenses. Voyage expenses are all expenses
unique to a particular voyage, including any bunker fuel
expenses, port fees, cargo loading and unloading expenses, canal
tolls, agency fees and commissions. Voyage expenses are
typically paid by the customer under time charters and by us
under voyage charters. When we pay voyage expenses, we typically
add them to our hire rates at an approximate cost.
Net Voyage Revenues. Net voyage revenues represent
voyage revenues less voyage expenses. Because the amount of
voyage expenses we incur for a particular charter depends upon
the form of the charter, we use net voyage revenues to improve
the comparability between periods of reported revenues that are
generated by the different forms of charters.
Vessel Operating Expenses. We are responsible for
vessel operating expenses, which include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. The two largest components of vessel operating
expenses are crews and repairs and maintenance.
|
|
|
|
|
Crews. Crews represented approximately 53% of our
vessel operating expenses for 2003 and 2004. A substantial
majority of our crewing expenses are denominated in Euros, which
is primarily a function of the nationality of our crew.
Fluctuations in the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar have
caused, and will continue to cause, fluctuations in our
operating results. |
|
|
|
Repairs and Maintenance. Repairs and maintenance
represented approximately 30% of vessel operating expenses for
2003 and 2004. Expenses for repairs and maintenance tend to
fluctuate from period to period because most repairs and
maintenance typically occur during periodic drydockings. Please
read Drydocking below. Because vessel
operating expenses such as repairs and maintenance are lower for
newer vessels, and our fleet is relatively new, we expect these
expenses to increase as our fleet matures. |
Income from Vessel Operations. To assist us in
evaluating our operations by segment, we sometimes analyze the
income we receive from each segment after deducting operating
expenses and depreciation and amortization, but prior to the
deduction of interest expenses, taxes, foreign currency and
interest rate swap gains or losses and other income and losses.
Please read Note 2 to the historical consolidated financial
statements of Teekay Spain included elsewhere in this prospectus
for further information on our income from vessel operations.
Drydocking. We must periodically drydock each of
our vessels for inspection, repairs and maintenance and any
modifications to comply with industry certification or
governmental requirements. Generally, we drydock each
LNG carrier and Suezmax tanker every five years. In
addition, a shipping society classification intermediate survey
is performed on our LNG carriers between the second and
third year of the five-year drydocking period. We capitalize a
substantial portion of the costs we incur during drydocking and
for the survey and amortize those costs on a straight-line basis
from the completion of a drydocking or intermediate survey to
the estimated completion of the next drydocking. We expense costs
80
related to routine repairs and maintenance incurred during
drydocking that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the
assets. The number of drydockings undertaken in a given period,
the size of the vessels and the nature of the work performed
determine the level of drydocking expenditures.
Depreciation and Amortization. Our depreciation
and amortization expense typically consists of the following
three components:
|
|
|
|
|
charges related to the depreciation of the historical cost of
our fleet (less an estimated residual value) over the estimated
useful lives of our vessels; |
|
|
|
charges related to the amortization of drydocking expenditures
over the estimated number of years to the next scheduled
drydocking; and |
|
|
|
charges related to the amortization of the fair value of the
time charters acquired in the Teekay Spain acquisition (over the
remaining terms of the charters), which was initially determined
at approximately $183 million in April 2004 when Teekay
Shipping Corporation acquired Teekay Spain. |
Calendar-ship-days. Calendar-ship-days are equal
to the aggregate number of calendar days in a period that our
vessels operate during that period.
Restricted Cash Deposits. Under capital lease
arrangements for two of our LNG carriers, we (a) borrowed
under term loans and deposited the proceeds into restricted cash
accounts and (b) entered into capital leases, also referred
to as bareboat charters, for the vessels. The
restricted cash deposits, together with interest earned on the
deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the
lease arrangements, including our obligation to purchase the
vessels at the end of the lease terms. During vessel
construction, we borrowed under the term loans and made
restricted cash deposits equal to construction installment
payments.
Foreign Currency Fluctuations. Our results of
operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange
rates. The volatility in our financial results due to currency
exchange rate fluctuations can be attributed to the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized end of period revaluations. Under
U.S. accounting guidelines, all foreign
currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities, such as
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, restricted cash,
accounts payable, long-term debt and capital lease obligations,
are revalued and reported based on the prevailing exchange rate
at the end of the period. As long as our foreign
currency-denominated monetary liabilities continue to be in
excess of our foreign currency-denominated monetary assets, we
will record gains if the U.S. Dollar has strengthened
against the applicable foreign currencies during the period, and
we record losses if the U.S. Dollar has weakened against
the applicable foreign currencies during the period. Most of our
foreign currency gains and losses are attributable to this
revaluation in respect of our Euro-denominated term loans, which
totaled 294.8 million Euros ($372.4 million) and
325.8 million Euros ($443.7 million) as at
December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. We recorded
foreign currency exchange rate losses of $71.5 million for
2003 and $16.1 million for 2004, substantially all of which
losses were unrealized. |
|
|
|
Foreign currency revenues and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of our voyage revenues are denominated in Euros. As a
result, fluctuations in the Euro relative to the
U.S. Dollar have caused, and are likely to continue to
cause, fluctuations in our reported voyage revenues. In 2003 and
2004, approximately 11% and 23%, respectively, of our voyage
revenues were Euro-denominated. |
|
|
|
A substantial majority of our vessel operating expenses and
general and administrative expenses are denominated in Euros,
which is primarily a function of the nationality of our crew and
administrative staff. We also have Euro-denominated interest
expense related to our Euro-denominated loans. As a result,
fluctuations in the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar have
caused, and are likely to continue to cause, fluctuations in our
reported expenses. In 2003 and |
81
|
|
|
|
|
2004, approximately 85% of our vessel operating expenses
and substantially all of our general and administrative expenses
were Euro-denominated. |
Our Euro-denominated revenues currently generally approximate
our Euro-denominated expenses and Euro-denominated loan and
interest payments. For this reason, we have not entered into any
forward contracts or similar arrangements to protect against the
risk of foreign currency-denominated revenues, expenses or
monetary assets or liabilities. If our foreign
currency-denominated revenues and expenses become sufficiently
disproportionate in the future, we may engage in hedging
activities. For more information, please read
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk.
|
|
|
Items You Should Consider When Evaluating Our Historical
Financial Performance and Assessing Our Future Prospects |
You should consider the following factors when evaluating our
historical financial performance and assessing our future
prospects:
|
|
|
|
|
We have disposed of certain assets included in our
historical results of operations. Immediately prior to
its acquisition by Teekay Shipping Corporation in April 2004,
Tapias disposed of certain assets unrelated to the marine
transportation operations purchased by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. These unrelated assets included certain investments
in marketable securities and other non-shipping assets,
including real estate and a yacht. Since these unrelated assets
were held in Tapias ship owning subsidiaries acquired by Teekay
Shipping Corporation, the financial impact of the assets is
included in our historical operating results discussed below
through the date of their disposition (as opposed to three
unrelated businesses previously held in separate subsidiaries
not acquired in the Tapias acquisition, which are not included
in our historical operating results). Excluding expenses
associated with the yacht, none of the unrelated assets had a
significant impact on our operating results. |
|
|
|
We have increased, and expect to continue to increase, the
size of our LNG carrier fleet. Our historical results of
operations include only one LNG carrier operating in the last
part of 2002 and only two LNG carriers operating during parts of
2003 and the first six months of 2004. In July and December
2004, we took delivery of our third and fourth LNG carriers. We
expect to operate the three additional RasGas II LNG
newbuildings upon their deliveries in the fourth quarter of 2006
and the first half of 2007. In addition, our growth strategy
focuses on expanding our fleet of LNG carriers under long-term,
fixed-rate time charters. |
|
|
|
We will operate five, not six, Suezmax tankers.
Our historical results of operations reflect the
operation of six Suezmax tankers. In the fourth quarter of 2004,
we disposed of two Suezmax tankers under charter to CEPSA (the
Leon Spirit and Sevilla Spirit) for a total of
$46.4 million, resulting in a gain of $3.4 million
relative to the carrying amounts of the vessels. The Leon
Spirit was replaced in the fourth quarter of 2004 by the
delivery of another Suezmax tanker (the Teide Spirit)
chartered to CEPSA. As a result, the disposition will have an
immaterial effect on our operations and cash flows. The
Sevilla Spirit will be replaced in the third quarter of
2005 with another Suezmax tanker (the Toledo Spirit) that
will be chartered to CEPSA. Pending delivery of the Toledo
Spirit, we will operate the Granada Spirit pursuant
to a fixed-rate time charter. We have an agreement to sell the
Granada Spirit to Teekay Shipping Corporation no later
than the delivery of the Toledo Spirit. Please read
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Granada Spirit Charter and Purchase
Agreement. Upon the closing of this offering, we will
operate five Suezmax tankers as a result of these vessel
dispositions and deliveries. |
|
|
|
Our results from December 2004 until the closing of this
offering will not include results from the Granada Spirit.
In December 2004, we transferred the Granada
Spirit to another Teekay Shipping Corporation subsidiary not
organized in Spain in connection with a significant drydocking
and re-flagging the vessel. We did not recognize a gain or loss
on that transfer. Upon the closing of this offering, Teekay
Shipping Corporation will contribute the Granada Spirit
back to us. Please read Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Granada Spirit Charter and |
82
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Agreement. Our results from the time we
transferred the vessel to the closing of this offering will not
reflect the results of the Granada Spirit. |
|
|
|
We do not anticipate earning revenues from voyage charters
in the foreseeable future. Upon the closing of this
offering, all of our vessels will operate under fixed-rate time
charters, and we do not anticipate earning any revenues from
voyage charters in the foreseeable future. Our recent results
reflect relatively high voyage charter rates earned by the
Granada Spirit, which has operated under voyage charters
based on spot market rates and which was part of our fleet until
December 2004 when we sold it to Teekay Shipping Corporation.
When Teekay Shipping Corporation contributes the Granada
Spirit back to us upon the closing of this offering, we will
concurrently charter it to Teekay Shipping Corporation under a
short-term, fixed-rate time charter. The charter rate will be
less than rates recently earned by the Granada Spirit in
the spot market, but the fixed rate will meet our strategy of
earning stable revenues from fixed-rate time charters. The
average quarterly net voyage revenues we expect to receive under
the fixed-rate time charter to Teekay Shipping Corporation
during 2005 are approximately $1.9 million less than the
average quarterly revenues we earned on the Granada
Spirit in 2004. |
|
|
|
The time charters for two of our Suezmax tankers, the
Sevilla Spirit, prior to being sold in the fourth quarter
of 2004, and the Teide Spirit, which began operating in
the fourth quarter of 2004, contain a component providing for
additional revenues to us beyond the fixed hire rate when
current market rates exceed certain amounts. Accordingly, even
though declining spot market rates will not result in our
receiving less than the fixed hire rate, our results will
continue to be influenced, in part, by the variable component of
the Teide Spirit charter. During 2004, we earned
$4.2 million in additional revenue from this variable
component. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have designated our interest rate swaps as
hedges. We have entered into interest rate swaps to
hedge our interest rate risk from our floating-rate debt used to
purchase our LNG carriers. These interest rate swaps were not
designated as hedges under U.S. accounting guidelines until
April 30, 2004. Consequently, the changes in the fair
values of these swaps that occurred during 2002, 2003 and the
four months ended April 30, 2004 have been recorded in
earnings as interest rate swaps gain (loss) for
those periods. Had these interest rate swaps been designated as
hedges prior to 2003, any subsequent changes in fair value would
have been recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) to the extent the hedge was effective and
until the hedged item was recognized as income. Because the
swaps have been highly effective, the change in fair value after
April 30, 2004 has been reflected in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and, because we expect the swaps, or
replacement swaps, to continue to be highly effective, we expect
that most of the change in value will continue to be reflected
in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). For further
information on our interest rate swaps, please read Note 13
to the consolidated audited financial statements of Teekay Spain
included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition, in April
2005 we settled our existing interest rate swaps in connection
with prepayment of debt associated with two of our LNG carriers,
and we have settled and replaced our existing interest rate
swaps associated with our other two LNG carriers. Please read
Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
|
We will incur additional general and administrative
expenses. Upon the closing of this offering, we and
certain of our subsidiaries will enter into services agreements
with certain subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation
pursuant to which those subsidiaries will provide us and our
subsidiaries certain services, including strategic consulting,
advisory, ship management, technical and administrative
services. Our cost for these services will depend on the amount
and type of services provided during each period. The services
will be valued at a reasonable, arms-length rate that will
include reimbursement of reasonable direct or indirect expenses
incurred to provide the services. We will also reimburse our
general partner for all expenses it incurs on our behalf. For
2005, we estimate these services and general partner
reimbursements will increase our expenses by an additional
$1.6 million, primarily depending on the particular amount
and type of services actually provided during the year. We may
also pay incentive fees to Teekay Shipping
Corporation to reward and motivate it for pursuing LNG projects
that we may elect to undertake, |
83
|
|
|
|
|
and we may grant equity compensation that would result in an
expense to us. Either of these may result in an increase in
expenses, although we currently do not have an estimate of the
possible expenses. Please read Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Omnibus Agreement
and Management 2005 Long-Term Incentive
plan. |
|
|
|
We Have Derived, and We Expect to Continue to Derive, a
Substantial Majority of Our Revenues From a Limited Number of
Customers. |
In 2003 and 2004, we derived 84% and 75%, respectively, of our
revenues from three customers CEPSA (47% and 36%,
respectively), Repsol YPF, S.A. (26% and 18%) and Gas Natural
SDG, S.A. (11% and 21%). For more information about these
customers, please read Business Our
Customers. After delivery of the three RasGas II LNG
newbuildings and commencement of the related charters, we expect
to derive a significant amount of revenues from RasGas II.
We have long-term, fixed-rate time charters with each of our
existing customers and expect to continue to derive a
substantial majority of our revenue and cash flows from them.
The loss of any customer or time charter, or a significant
decline in payments under our time charters, could materially
and adversely affect our revenues, cash flows and operating
results. Please see Risk Factors Risks
Inherent in Our Business We derive a substantial
majority of our revenues from three customers, and the loss of
any customer, time charter or vessel could result in a
significant loss of revenues and cash flows.
We could lose one of these customers or another customer or the
benefits of a time charter if:
|
|
|
|
|
the customer exercises certain rights to terminate the charter,
purchase or cause the sale of the vessel or, under some of our
charters, convert the time charter to a bareboat charter (some
of which rights are exerciseable at any time); |
|
|
|
the customer terminates the charter because we fail to deliver
the vessel within a fixed period of time, the vessel is lost or
damaged beyond repair, there are serious deficiencies in the
vessel or prolonged periods of off-hire, or we default under the
charter; or |
|
|
|
under some of our time charters, the customer terminates the
charter because of the termination of the charters LNG
sales agreement supplying the LNG designated for our services,
or a prolonged force majeure event affecting the customer,
including damage to or destruction of relevant LNG production or
regasification facilities, war or political unrest preventing us
from performing services for that customer. |
Please read Business LNG Time
Charters Purchase Options, Terminations Rights and
Bareboat Conversion Options and Crude
Oil Time Charters CEPSAs Right to
Terminate for more information about the termination and
related provisions under our charters.
Our customers primary obligation under the time charter
contracts is to pay us for our services, and the contracts
provide narrow exceptions to this payment obligation for force
majeure events and, in limited circumstances as described above,
LNG supply disruptions. However, we could lose the benefits of a
time charter if the customer fails to make charter payments
because of its financial inability, disagreements with us or
otherwise. Our customers include major energy companies and
their affiliates. Factors materially and adversely affecting the
supply of or demand for LNG or crude oil or the financial
condition and operating results of our customers could affect
their ability to make charter payments to us.
|
|
|
Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. |
Teekay Shipping Corporation formed Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
(Luxco) in April 2004 to acquire and hold Tapias. Teekay
Shipping Corporation will contribute the capital stock of Luxco
to us upon the closing of this offering, making it one of our
assets and an intermediate holding company of our operating
subsidiaries. To make the period-to-period discussion below more
comparable, our operating results and the discussion below do
not include the results of Luxco for the nine months ended
December 31, 2004.
84
In the nine months ended December 31, 2004, Luxco had no
revenues, expenses or income, or assets or liabilities, other
than:
|
|
|
|
|
$465.7 million of advances (including accrued interest)
from Teekay Shipping Corporation that were used by Luxco to
purchase Teekay Spain and will be used by Luxco to prepay
certain debt of Teekay Spain; |
|
|
|
$9.8 million of net interest expense related to the
advances; |
|
|
|
$44.7 million of unrealized foreign exchange losses related
to the advances, which are Euro-denominated; |
|
|
|
$1.1 million in other expenses; |
|
|
|
$2.2 million in cash and cash equivalents; and |
|
|
|
its interest in Teekay Spain and certain purchase rights and
obligations for Suezmax tankers operated by Teekay Spain under
capital lease arrangements, which it acquired from Teekay Spain
on December 30, 2004. |
We believe the exclusion of the Luxco results make our results
more comparable because Luxcos results and financial
position relate solely to the financing of the acquisition of
Teekay Spain and repayment of Teekay Spain debt by Teekay
Shipping Corporation and do not relate to the historical results
of Teekay Spain. In addition, because the capital stock of Luxco
and the $465.7 million of advances will be contributed to
us upon the closing of this offering, these advances and their
related effects will be eliminated on consolidation, as
reflected in our pro forma financial statements included in this
prospectus. For more information on Luxco, please read the
unaudited consolidated financial statements of Luxco included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Results of Operations
The following table presents our operating results by reportable
segment for 2002, 2003 and 2004, and compares our net voyage
revenues for those years to the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. For ease of comparison in the following table
and the discussion below, we combine our results for the four
months ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
54,418 |
|
|
$ |
5,448 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
54,102 |
|
|
$ |
32,607 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
64,438 |
|
|
$ |
59,395 |
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,788 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
4,678 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
49,099 |
|
|
$ |
5,433 |
|
|
$ |
54,532 |
|
|
$ |
49,314 |
|
|
$ |
32,484 |
|
|
$ |
81,798 |
|
|
$ |
59,760 |
|
|
$ |
59,141 |
|
|
$ |
118,901 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
15,789 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
20,584 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
20,002 |
|
|
|
10,615 |
|
|
|
30, 617 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,579 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
17,760 |
|
|
|
5,630 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
19,469 |
|
|
|
15,391 |
|
|
|
34,860 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
6,237 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
4,466 |
|
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
6,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
10,494 |
|
|
$ |
3,744 |
|
|
$ |
14,238 |
|
|
$ |
3,854 |
|
|
$ |
19,315 |
|
|
$ |
23,169 |
|
|
$ |
15,823 |
|
|
$ |
31,198 |
|
|
$ |
47,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
85
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Versus Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Our four LNG carriers were delivered into our fleet in September
2002, August 2003, July 2004 and December 2004. Accordingly, our
total calendar-ship-days increased by 74.1%, from 518 days
in 2003 to 902 days in 2004.
Net voyage revenues increased 82.1% to $59.1 million for
2004, from $32.5 million for 2003, which was attributable
to the addition of our LNG carriers during 2003 and 2004 and
higher rates earned by more recently delivered LNG carriers.
Vessel operating expenses increased 81.3% to $10.6 million
for 2004, compared to $5.9 million for 2003. Approximately
$4.4 million of the increase was attributable to the
delivery of our LNG carriers during 2003 and 2004, and
approximately $0.3 million of the increase was attributable
to the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar in
2004. A majority of our vessel operating expenses are
denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function of the
nationality of our crew.
Depreciation and amortization increased 173.4% to
$15.4 million for 2004, from $5.6 million for 2003,
primarily due to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the addition of our three LNG carriers in August 2003 and July
and December 2004; |
|
|
|
the amortization, as an intangible asset, of the value of the
Tapias time charters acquired on April 30, 2004; and |
|
|
|
increased depreciation resulting from recording the Tapias
vessels at their acquisition cost as compared to their
depreciated value prior to the acquisition. |
During 2003, we operated six Suezmax tankers. During the fourth
quarter of 2004, we took delivery of one Suezmax newbuilding and
sold three Suezmax tankers. As a result, our total
calendar-ship-days decreased by 5.3% from 2,190 days in 2003 to
2,073 days in 2004.
Net voyage revenues increased 21.2% to $59.8 million for 2004,
from $49.3 million for 2003. The increase was primarily the
result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $5.1 million increase in net voyage revenues for 2004
compared to 2003 due to increases in average spot market rates
earned by the Granada Spirit; |
|
|
|
a $4.2 million increase in net voyage revenues for 2004 compared
to 2003 due to an increase in the voyage revenues earned from a
charter with a variable component based on spot market rates; and |
|
|
|
a $2.9 million increase in net voyage revenues due to fewer
off-hire days from drydocking in 2004 compared to 2003. |
These increases were partially offset by a decrease of
$1.2 million in net voyage revenues due to a net reduction
in fleet size and corresponding reduction in calendar-ship-days
in 2004, and by a $0.5 million decrease in net voyage revenues
in 2004 from three time charters that fluctuate based on changes
in interest rates. However, under the terms of our capital
leases for the three vessels with fluctuating charter rates, we
had a corresponding reduction in our lease payments, which is
reflected as a reduction of interest expense. Therefore, these
interest rate adjustments, which will continue, did not have any
effect on our cash flow and net income.
Vessel operating expenses decreased 2.8% to $20.0 million
for 2004, compared to $20.6 million for 2003, primarily due
to the reduction in calendar-ship-days, partially offset by
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar.
86
Depreciation and amortization increased 9.6% to
$19.5 million for 2004, from $17.8 million for 2003.
The increase was primarily due to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the amortization, as an intangible asset, of the value of the
Tapias time charters acquired on April 30, 2004; and |
|
|
|
increased depreciation resulting from recording the Tapias
vessels at their acquisition cost as compared to their
depreciated value prior to the acquisition. |
Other Operating
Results
General and administrative expenses decreased 27.2% to
$6.4 million for 2004, from $8.8 million for 2003,
primarily due to a $3.0 million decrease in expenses
resulting from four months of expenses associated with a yacht
and certain other non-shipping assets disposed of by Tapias
immediately prior to its acquisition on April 30, 2004 by
Teekay Shipping Corporation, compared to a full year of these
expenses included in our results for 2003. The decrease in
general and administrative expenses in 2004 was partially offset
by an increase of $0.6 million in shore-staff performance-based
bonuses.
Interest expense increased 77.9% to $62.0 million for 2004,
from $34.9 million for 2003. This increase primarily
reflects increases in interest-bearing debt and capital lease
obligations associated with the delivery of one LNG carrier in
each of August 2003 and July 2004. For more
information, please read Liquidity and Capital
Resources Ship Financing Arrangements below.
Interest income increased 162.3% to $22.1 million for 2004,
from $8.4 million for 2003. This increase was primarily due
to interest earned on increased restricted cash deposits.
Foreign currency exchange loss decreased to $16.1 million
for 2004 from $71.5 million for 2003. These foreign
currency exchange losses substantially all of which
were unrealized are due substantially to the
period-end revaluation of Euro-denominated term loans for
financial reporting purposes. The higher loss in 2003 reflects
the greater weakening of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro during
2003 compared to 2004.
We incurred gains of $4.0 million in 2004 and
$14.7 million in 2003 due to the changes in fair values of
our interest rate swaps. These interest rate swaps were not
designated as hedges under U.S. accounting guidelines until
April 30, 2004. Consequently, the changes in fair values of
these swaps that occurred during the four months ended
April 30, 2004 and 2003 have been recorded in earnings as
interest rate swaps gain (losses) for those periods.
Other loss of $7.6 million for 2004 resulted from a
$11.9 million loss on the sale of non-shipping assets by
Tapias prior to its acquisition on April 30, 2004 by Teekay
Shipping Corporation and $0.1 million of minority interest
expense, partially offset by $3.4 million of gains on the
sale of vessels and equipment, $0.7 million of income tax
recoveries, $0.1 million of gains on the sale of marketable
securities and $0.3 million of other miscellaneous income.
Other income of $0.6 million for 2003 resulted from a
$1.6 million gain on the sale of marketable securities and
$2.2 million of other miscellaneous income, partially
offset by $3.0 million of income taxes and
$0.2 million of minority interest expense. The marketable
securities, other miscellaneous income and minority interest
expense all relate to non-shipping assets disposed of by Tapias
prior to its acquisition by Teekay Shipping Corporation.
As a result of the foregoing, net loss decreased to
$12.6 million for 2004 from $59.4 million for 2003.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Versus Year Ended
December 31, 2002
LNG Carrier Segment
We took delivery of our first LNG carrier in September 2002 and
our second LNG carrier in August 2003. Accordingly, our results
reflect the operation of one LNG carrier for approximately three
months in 2002, and one LNG carrier for all of 2003 and an
additional LNG carrier for part of 2003, increasing total
calendar-ship-days from 93 days in 2002 to 518 days in
2003.
87
Net voyage revenues increased to $32.5 million for 2003
from $5.4 million for 2002, due to an increase in total
calendar-ship-days.
Vessel operating expenses increased to $5.9 million for
2003, compared to $0.3 million for 2002, primarily due to
the increase in total calendar-ship-days. Approximately
$5.5 million of the increase was attributable to the
increase in calendar-ship-days and approximately
$0.1 million of the increase was attributable to the
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar.
Depreciation and amortization increased to $5.6 million for
2003, from $1.1 million for 2002, primarily due to the
increase in our fleet size.
Suezmax Tanker
Segment
The number of vessels in our Suezmax tanker fleet remained
unchanged for 2003 compared to 2002. During both periods, we had
six Suezmax tankers and operated 2,190 calendar-ship-days.
Net voyage revenues increased 0.4% to $49.3 million for
2003, from $49.1 million for 2002, primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $4.5 million increase in voyage revenues from the
Granada Spirit from the prior period, due primarily to an
increase in average spot market rates, |
|
|
|
substantially offset by a $3.7 million decrease in voyage
revenues due to a greater number of off-hire days from
drydocking in 2003 compared to 2002 and, to a lesser extent,
from $0.6 million in decreased voyage revenues from three
time charters that fluctuate based on changes in interest rates. |
Vessel operating expenses increased 30.4% to $20.6 million
for 2003, compared to $15.8 million for 2002. Approximately
half of the total increase in vessel operating expenses was due
to Euro-denominated expenses and the strengthening of the Euro
against the U.S. Dollar. A majority of our vessel operating
expenses are denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function
of the nationality of our crew. The remaining increase was due
to an increase in repair and maintenance activity in 2003, as
four of our Suezmax tankers were drydocked during 2003 compared
to one in 2002.
Depreciation and amortization increased 7.1% to
$17.8 million for 2003, from $16.6 million for 2002.
The increase was due to an increase in amortization of
drydocking costs of $2.0 million in 2003 from
$0.8 million for 2002.
Other Operating
Results
General and administrative expenses increased 35.3% to
$8.8 million for 2003, from $6.5 million for 2002,
primarily due to a $1.9 million increase in expenses
resulting from a full years inclusion of expenses in 2003
for a yacht that was purchased during the latter half of 2002.
The yacht was sold to Tapiass then controlling shareholder
immediately prior to the April 2004 sale of Tapias to Teekay
Shipping Corporation.
Interest expense increased 92.8% to $34.9 million for 2003,
from $18.1 million for 2002. This increase primarily
reflects increases in interest-bearing debt and capital lease
obligations associated with the delivery of two LNG carriers in
September 2002 and August 2003. For more information, please
read Liquidity and Capital
Resources Ship Financing Arrangements below.
Interest income increased 60.7% to $8.4 million for 2003,
from $5.2 million for 2002. This increase was primarily due
to interest earned on increased restricted cash deposits.
Foreign currency exchange loss increased to $71.5 million
in 2003, from $44.3 million for 2002. These foreign
currency exchange losses are due primarily to the year-end
revaluation of our two Euro-denominated term loans for financial
reporting purposes. During 2003, the U.S. Dollar weakened
considerably against the Euro.
88
During 2002 and 2003, we incurred a loss of $71.4 million
and a gain of $14.7 million, respectively, due to the
changes in fair values of our interest rate swaps. These changes
in value were primarily due to changes in interest rates in the
corresponding periods. For more information, please read
Overview Items You Should Consider
When Evaluating Our Historical Financial Performance and
Assessing Our Future Prospects We have designated
our interest rate swaps as hedges above.
Other income of $0.6 million for 2002 was comprised of a
$0.5 million gain on the sale of marketable securities,
$0.1 million in dividend income and $2.4 million of
other miscellaneous income, partially offset by
$2.2 million of income taxes and $0.2 million of
minority interest expense. Other income of $0.6 million
during 2003 was comprised of a $1.6 million gain on sale of
marketable securities and $2.2 million of other
miscellaneous income, partially offset by $3.0 million in
income taxes and $0.2 million of minority interest expense.
As a result of the foregoing, net loss decreased to
$59.4 million for 2003, from $113.8 million for 2002.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity and Cash
Needs
As at March 31, 2005, our total cash and cash equivalents
was $193.5 million, compared to $154.2 million and
$21.3 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Our total liquidity, including cash and undrawn
long-term borrowings, was also $193.5 million as at
March 31, 2005. The increase in cash and cash equivalents
since December 31, 2003 was primarily the result of $111.7
million of advances from Luxco, the completion of the sale of a
Suezmax newbuilding in March 2005 and cash from operations. We
used these funds to repay certain term loans and settle interest
rate swaps, as described in Use of Proceeds. In
connection with this offering, we also entered into a
$100 million secured revolving credit facility.
Our primary short-term liquidity needs are to fund general
working capital requirements and drydocking expenditures, while
our long-term liquidity needs primarily relate to expansion and
other maintenance capital expenditures and debt repayment.
Expansion capital expenditures are primarily for the purchase or
construction of vessels to the extent the expenditures increase
the operating capacity or revenue generated by our fleet, while
maintenance capital expenditures primarily consist of drydocking
expenditures and expenditures to replace vessels in order to
maintain the operating capacity or revenue generated by our
fleet. We anticipate that our primary sources of funds for our
short-term liquidity needs will be cash flows from operations,
while our long-term sources of funds will be from cash from
operations, long-term bank borrowings and other debt or equity
financings.
We believe that cash flows from operations will be sufficient to
meet our short-term liquidity needs for at least the next
12 months. We will need to raise additional capital to
finance our ongoing construction and newbuilding acquisition
projects and other long-term commitments. We cannot assure you
that we will be able to raise additional funds on favorable
terms. For more information, please read
Maintenance Capital Expenditures below.
Cash Flows. The following table summarizes our
cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) operating,
financing and investing activities for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Net cash flow from operating activities
|
|
$ |
20,418 |
|
|
$ |
18,318 |
|
|
$ |
22,189 |
|
Net cash flow from financing activities
|
|
|
176,316 |
|
|
|
(277,616 |
) |
|
|
69,799 |
|
Net cash flow from investing activities
|
|
|
(199,218 |
) |
|
|
262,766 |
|
|
|
40,887 |
|
89
Operating Cash Flows. Net cash flow from operating
activities increased to $22.2 million in 2004, from
$18.3 million in 2003, mainly reflecting the increase in
our LNG fleet size and the significant increase in our average
spot market hire rates for the Granada Spirit. Net cash
flow from operating activities decreased to $18.3 million
in 2003, from $20.4 million in 2002, primarily due to an
increase in the number of drydockings, partially offset by the
increase in our LNG fleet size. Net cash flow from operating
activities depends upon the timing of drydocking expenditures,
repairs and maintenance activity, vessel additions and
dispositions, foreign currency rates, changes in interest rates,
fluctuations in working capital balances and spot market hire
rates (to the extent we have vessels operating in the spot
tanker market or our hire rates are partially affected by spot
market rates). The number of vessel drydockings tends to be
uneven between years. For more information on our expected
drydocking expenditures, please read
Maintenance Capital Expenditures
Ongoing Maintenance Capital Expenditures below.
Financing Cash Flows. Our investments in vessels
and equipment have been financed primarily with term loans and
capital lease arrangements. Net proceeds from long-term debt
were $133.7 million, $211.0 million and
$228.5 million, respectively, for 2004, 2003 and 2002.
During 2003, we sold and leased back our two LNG carriers for
proceeds of $399.2 million. We used $248.1 million of
the proceeds to repay debt. At approximately the same time, we
made restricted deposits of $242.1 million that, together
with the $16.9 million and $56.5 million we deposited
in 2002 and 2004, respectively, less the $76.3 million we
used to repay a portion of our capital lease obligation in 2004,
approximates the present value of the remaining amounts owing
under the capital lease agreements, including the amounts
required for us to fulfill our obligation to purchase these two
LNG carriers in 2006 and 2011. The deposits were primarily
funded with term loans and a Spanish government grant in the
form of a one-time payment (in lieu of receiving a subsidized
financing rate) on the delivery of an LNG carrier. We discuss
below our future commitments for capital expenditures related to
newbuildings.
Investing Cash Flows. Net cash used in investing
activities for the periods noted above consisted primarily of
construction costs relating to the three Suezmax tankers and
four LNG carriers we had under construction at various times
during these periods. These costs amounted to
$89.2 million, $133.6 million and $186.8 million,
respectively, during 2004, 2003 and 2002. In 2004, we sold three
Suezmax tankers for proceeds of $74.3 million and also sold
and leased back one Suezmax tanker for proceeds of
$49.4 million. One of these Suezmax tankers, the Granada
Spirit, was sold to another Teekay Shipping Corporation
subsidiary. Upon the closing of this offering, Teekay Shipping
Corporation will contribute the Granada Spirit back to
us. In 2003, as mentioned above, we sold and leased backed our
two LNG carriers. In 2002, we purchased an entity that owned an
LNG carrier on long-term charter to a Spanish oil company from
our then controlling shareholder for $15.8 million (net of
cash assumed of $5.1 million), which was substantially paid
in 2002 and 2003.
Ongoing Capital
Expenditures
Marine transportation of LNG and crude oil is a
capital-intensive business, requiring significant investment to
maintain an efficient fleet and to stay in regulatory compliance.
Over the five years following the date of this offering, we
estimate that we will spend an average of approximately
$1.2 million for each Suezmax vessel and approximately
$2.8 million for each LNG carrier for drydocking and
society classification surveys. As our fleet matures and
expands, our drydocking expenses will likely increase. Ongoing
costs for compliance with environmental regulations are
primarily included as part of our drydocking and society
classification survey costs or are a component of our operating
expenses. We are not aware of any regulatory changes or
environmental liabilities that we anticipate will have a
material impact on our current or future operations.
Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct
from operating surplus each quarter estimated maintenance
capital expenditures, as opposed to actual maintenance capital
expenditures in order to reduce disparities in operating surplus
caused by fluctuating maintenance capital expenditures, such as
drydocking and vessel replacement. Because of the substantial
capital expenditures we are required to make to maintain our
fleet, our initial annual estimated maintenance capital
expenditures for purposes
90
of calculating operating surplus will be $16.4 million per
year, which is comprised of $4.4 million for drydocking
costs for all of our vessels and $12.0 million, including
financing costs, for replacing our LNG carriers and Suezmax
tankers at the end of their useful lives. The actual cost of
replacing our LNG carriers and Suezmax tankers will depend on a
number of factors, including prevailing market conditions,
charter rates and the availability and cost of financing at the
time of replacement. The board of directors of our general
partner with the approval of its conflicts committee may
determine to increase the annual amount of our estimated
maintenance capital expenditures. In years when estimated
maintenance capital expenditures are higher than actual
maintenance capital expenditures, the amount of cash available
for distribution to unitholders will be lower than if actual
maintenance capital expenditures were deducted from operating
surplus.
|
|
|
Historical Capital Expenditures |
The following table summarizes total capital expenditures for
drydocking and for vessels and equipment for the periods
presented. In the past, we categorized our vessel replacement
and fleet expansion expenditures as expenditures for
vessels and equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
$ |
984 |
|
|
$ |
4,711 |
|
|
$ |
4,085 |
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
186,755 |
|
|
|
133,628 |
|
|
|
89,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
187,739 |
|
|
$ |
138,339 |
|
|
$ |
93,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ship Financing Arrangements |
We have employed the following types of financing arrangements
to purchase our vessels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loans. Two of our LNG carriers have been
financed with term loans that are collateralized by first
preferred mortgages. We repaid these term loans in April 2005.
See Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Arrangements. Under the capital
lease arrangements for our Suezmax tankers, we leased the
vessels from third parties pursuant to bareboat charters and
make lease payments based on the lessees repayment
schedule for the vessel construction financing costs. At the end
of the lease terms, we are obligated to purchase the vessels for
a fixed price based on the remaining unamortized portion of the
vessel construction financing costs. |
|
|
|
Spanish Tax Lease Arrangements. Under capital
lease arrangements for two of our LNG carriers, we have borrowed
under term loans and deposited the proceeds into restricted cash
accounts. Concurrently, we entered into capital leases for the
vessels pursuant to bareboat charters and recorded the vessels
as assets when the vessels began operations. The restricted cash
deposits, together with interest earned on the deposits, will
equal the remaining amounts we owe under the lease arrangements,
including our obligations to purchase the vessels at the end of
the lease terms. At the end of the lease terms, the amounts
remaining in the restricted cash deposit accounts will be used
to purchase the vessels, and we will obtain title to the vessels. |
|
|
|
Warehousing. A subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation has contracted to have built the three
RasGas II vessels. Upon delivery of the first vessel, we
will acquire all of Teekay Shipping Corporations interest
in the subsidiary for a price that will reimburse Teekay
Shipping Corporation for (1) its costs related to the
construction of the three vessels and (2) a reasonable cost
of capital on vessel construction payments. Please read
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase RasGas II
Interest. |
91
The following table identifies each vessel and newbuilding in
our fleet, the type of financing arrangement currently
associated with each vessel and our remaining financial
commitments under each type of arrangement as at
December 31, 2004. Each amount associated with a
newbuilding is an estimate. Please read
Contractual Obligations and
Contingencies below for more information on our
newbuilding and other purchase commitments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel |
|
Type of Financing Arrangement |
|
Financial Commitment | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Operating LNG Vessels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispania Spirit
|
|
Term loans |
|
|
$165.7 million |
(1) |
Galicia Spirit
|
|
Term loan |
|
|
172.8 million |
(1) |
Catalunya Spirit
|
|
Spanish tax lease |
|
|
200.2 million |
(2) |
Madrid Spirit
|
|
Spanish tax lease |
|
|
240.8 million |
(2) |
LNG Newbuildings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hull No. 2238
|
|
Warehousing |
|
|
197.5 million |
(3) |
Hull No. 2239
|
|
Warehousing |
|
|
197.5 million |
(3) |
Hull No. 2240
|
|
Warehousing |
|
|
197.5 million |
(3) |
Operating Suezmax Tankers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granada Spirit
|
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
Tenerife Spirit
|
|
Capital lease(4) |
|
|
46.4 million |
(4) |
Algeciras Spirit
|
|
Capital lease(4) |
|
|
46.5 million |
(4) |
Huelva Spirit
|
|
Capital lease(4) |
|
|
44.2 million |
(4) |
Teide Spirit
|
|
Capital lease(4) |
|
|
50.6 million |
(4) |
Suezmax Newbuilding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toledo Spirit
|
|
Capital lease(5) |
|
|
50.0 million |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
$1,609.7 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We repaid the term loans for these vessels in April 2005. We
have also entered into a $100 million revolving credit
facility in connection with this offering, which facility will
be secured by a mortgage on the Hispania Spirit and a
pledge of certain shares of our subsidiary operating the carrier. |
|
|
(2) |
Represents the principal amount on the term loan(s) used to make
the restricted cash deposit that will fully pay the capital
lease obligations and pay capitalized interest and other
miscellaneous construction costs. |
|
(3) |
We estimate that the total cost to purchase the three
RasGas II vessels from Teekay Shipping Corporation will
equal approximately $592.5 million (which may be
proportionately reduced if Qatar Gas Transport Company Ltd.
(or Qatar Gas Transport) exercises its option to purchase
up to a 30% interest in each vessel). However, actual costs will
vary depending on the amount of miscellaneous construction costs
and when the vessels are actually delivered (which affects the
amount of capitalized interest). For purposes of this table, we
have provided our estimate and divided the amounts evenly over
the three vessels. Until we acquire Teekay Shipping
Corporations interest in the subsidiary contracting to
build the vessels, the accumulated construction costs and
corresponding financing will not be reflected on our balance
sheet. |
|
(4) |
Under the terms of the capital leases, the vessel owner enters
into a seven-year capital lease with financial institutions and
then leases the vessel to us for seven years pursuant to a
bareboat charter. At the end of the term, we are obligated to
purchase the vessel at a fixed price based on the unamortized
portion of the vessel construction financing costs. The purchase
obligations will be at various times from 2007 to 2011 and range
from $39.4 million to $43.5 million per vessel. We
expect that we will complete the purchase by assuming the
outstanding financing obligations; however, we may be required
to obtain separate debt or equity financing to complete the
purchases if the requisite lenders do not consent to our
assuming the financing obligations. The amount in the table
represents our remaining capital lease obligations, including
the amount of the vessel purchase price. |
|
(5) |
As at December 31, 2004, we had made $4.8 million of
progress payments on this newbuilding. We expect to make
additional construction installment payments prior to its
delivery, scheduled for July 2005, with temporary debt
financing. We anticipate permanently financing the Suezmax
newbuilding upon its delivery pursuant to financing arrangements
substantially similar to those for our other Suezmax tankers
subject to capital lease arrangements. |
92
Warehousing of RasGas II LNG Newbuildings. Teekay
Shipping Corporation, through it subsidiaries, is constructing
the three RasGas II LNG newbuildings, which are scheduled
for delivery in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first half of
2007. Teekay Shipping Corporation has agreed to assign to us all
of its interest in these vessels and the related 20-year
fixed-rate time charters with RasGas II upon delivery of
the first LNG newbuilding. This arrangement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation regarding the RasGas II vessels allows us to
defer our need to finance these vessels until closer to their
delivery and operation, which will reduce our need to finance
construction installments and related payments. For more
information, please read Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Agreement to Purchase
RasGas II Interest.
The RasGas II LNG carriers have a total construction cost
of approximately $514.5 million, or approximately
$171.5 million for each vessel. We estimate that the total
amount we will pay Teekay Shipping Corporation, including
shipyard payments, capitalized interest and the other costs,
will be approximately $592.5 million (which will be
proportionately reduced to the extent Qatar Gas Transport
exercises its option to purchase up to a 30% interest in each
vessel). Approximately $468 million of long-term vessel
financing is in place for these three vessels. We will assume
those financing obligations when we acquire Teekay Shipping
Corporations interest in the RasGas II vessels, and
Teekay Shipping Corporation has agreed to assist us in assuming
these financing obligations by remaining as a guarantor, if
necessary, in exchange for an appropriate fee. Assuming no
exercise by Qatar Gas Transport of its purchase options, we will
be required to fund the remaining approximately
$124.5 million as part of our purchase price for the
vessels. Payment for all of Teekay Shipping Corporations
interest in the vessels will be made at approximately the time
the first newbuilding is delivered, and will be made in cash or
our common units, at Teekay Shipping Corporations
election, or other consideration as agreed between Teekay
Shipping Corporation and the conflicts committee of our general
partners board of directors.
New
Projects
We and Teekay Shipping Corporation regularly evaluate and pursue
opportunities to provide the marine transportation requirements
for new or expanding LNG projects. Teekay Shipping Corporation
currently has submitted bids to provide transportation
requirements for several LNG projects and we and Teekay Shipping
Corporation may submit additional bids from time to time. The
award process relating to LNG transportation opportunities
typically involves various stages and takes several months to
complete. The award process for some of the projects upon which
Teekay Shipping Corporation has bid are in advanced stages.
Neither we nor Teekay Shipping Corporation may be awarded
charters relating to any of the projects we are or it is
pursuing. If any LNG project charters are awarded to Teekay
Shipping Corporation, it must offer them to us pursuant to the
terms of the omnibus agreement. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions Omnibus
Agreement. If Teekay Shipping Corporation is awarded
charters for any pending project or for any other project and we
elect to obtain the project pursuant to the omnibus agreement,
or if we bid on and are awarded contracts relating to any LNG
project, we will need to incur significant capital expenditures
to build the LNG carriers needed to fulfill the transportation
requirements. We would finance the capital expenditures for any
project we obtain through internally generated funds or debt or
equity financings, or through a warehousing or other type of
arrangement with Teekay Shipping Corporation or a third party.
Credit
Facility
In connection with this offering, one of our LNG carrier-owning
subsidiaries amended its current term loan agreement to provide
for a five-year $100 million senior secured revolving
credit facility. The facility may be used by us for general
partnership purposes and to fund cash distributions. Under the
revolving credit facility, we are required to reduce all
borrowings used to fund cash distributions to zero for a period
of at least fifteen consecutive days during any twelve-month
period.
Our obligations under the credit facility will be secured by a
first priority security interest on one of our LNG carriers, the
Hispania Spirit, and a pledge of certain shares of our
subsidiary operating the carrier. The borrowings under the
credit facility may be prepaid at any time in minimum or multiple
93
amounts of $5.0 million. Indebtedness under the facility
will bear interest at a rate equal to the sum of the LIBOR rate
(as defined in the credit facility) plus a margin of 1.2%.
Covenants and Other
Restrictions in Our Financing Agreements
All of our vessel financing is arranged on a vessel-by-vessel
basis, and each financing is secured by the applicable vessel.
Our capital leases do not contain financial or restrictive
covenants other than those relating to operation and maintenance
of the vessels.
The term loan agreements for our LNG carriers, including the
RasGas II financing agreements we expect to assume, are
with separate shipowning subsidiaries, although Teekay Spain
guarantees the payments under the term loan agreements for all
of our existing LNG carriers (or Teekay Shipping Corporation in
the case of the RasGas II loan agreements). These
agreements and the agreements that govern our revolving credit
facility contain covenants and other restrictions typical of
debt financing secured by vessels, including those that restrict
the shipowning subsidiaries from:
|
|
|
|
|
incurring or guaranteeing indebtedness; |
|
|
|
changing ownership or structure, including mergers,
consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions; |
|
|
|
making dividends or distributions; |
|
|
|
making capital expenditures in excess of specified levels; |
|
|
|
making certain negative pledges and granting certain liens; |
|
|
|
selling, transferring, assigning or conveying assets; |
|
|
|
making certain loans and investments; and |
|
|
|
entering into a new line of business. |
In addition, the term loan for one of our LNG carriers, the
Catalunya Spirit, contains covenants that require the
maintenance of a minimum liquidity of 5.0 million Euros and
make an annual 1.2 million Euro restricted cash deposit.
Our other LNG carrier term loan agreements (other than for
RasGas II) currently contain covenants that require the
maintenance of cash collateral, unencumbered liquidity and
minimum tangible net worth. In addition, the shipowning
subsidiaries may not pay dividends or distributions if we are in
default under the term loan agreements.
The RasGas II term loan agreements we expect to assume require
Teekay Shipping Corporations guaranty and require Teekay
Shipping Corporation to maintain at least $100.0 million of
free liquidity and that the amount of Teekay Shipping
Corporations consolidated free liquidity plus any undrawn
revolving credit facilities not be less than 7.5% of Teekay
Shipping Corporations total consolidated debt.
We are currently in compliance with all of our financing
agreements and expect to remain in compliance. In the future,
some of the covenants and restrictions in our financing
agreements could restrict the use of cash generated by our
shipowning subsidiaries in a manner that could adversely affect
our ability to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our
units. However, we currently do not expect that our covenants
will have such an effect.
Sale of the Granada
Spirit
The Granada Spirit is a single-hulled tanker that was
built in 1990 and acquired by Tapias. The Granada Spirit
has operated in the spot market. In December 2004, this vessel
was transferred to another subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation not organized in Spain in connection with a
significant drydocking and re-flagging of the vessel.
At the closing of this offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation
will contribute to us the Granada Spirit and enter into a
short-term, fixed-rate time charter to increase the
predictability and stability of the
94
vessels cash flow compared to its prior operation in the
spot market. The charter will terminate upon the earlier of the
delivery of our Suezmax newbuilding, the Toledo Spirit,
which is scheduled for July 20, 2005, or December 31,
2005, subject to an early termination right of Teekay Shipping
Corporation, as described below. Upon termination of the
charter, Teekay Shipping Corporation will purchase the vessel.
If the charter terminates on July 20, 2005 with the
scheduled delivery of the Toledo Spirit, Teekay Shipping
Corporation will purchase the Granada Spirit for
$19.5 million. If the Toledo Spirit delivers after
July 20, 2005 and Teekay Shipping Corporation does not
terminate the charter, the $19.5 million purchase price
will be reduced by $250,000 per month, or portion of month.
Teekay Shipping Corporation will also have the right to
terminate the charter early and purchase the Granada
Spirit at any time prior to July 20, 2005 and prior to
delivery of the Toledo Spirit. If Teekay Shipping
Corporation exercises this right, it will pay us
$19.5 million plus $600,000 for each month, or portion of a
month, we do not have the benefit of the time charter prior to
July 20, 2005. The additional payment reflects the
estimated monthly depreciation and the amount of cash flow we
would otherwise earn on the Granada Spirit pending the
scheduled delivery of the Toledo Spirit.
Contractual Obligations and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual
obligations as at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) | |
|
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
140.5 |
|
|
$ |
168.8 |
|
|
$ |
343.4 |
|
|
Commitments under capital leases(2)(3)
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
145.8 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
221.2 |
|
|
Newbuilding installments
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Dollar-denominated obligations
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
152.8 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
144.3 |
|
|
|
211.6 |
|
|
|
607.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-Denominated Obligations:(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt(5)
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
389.9 |
|
|
|
442.7 |
|
|
Commitments under capital leases(2)
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
167.8 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
124.9 |
|
|
|
497.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Euro-denominated obligations
|
|
|
116.1 |
|
|
|
177.2 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
514.8 |
|
|
|
940.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations
|
|
$ |
191.2 |
|
|
$ |
330.0 |
|
|
$ |
53.2 |
|
|
$ |
56.2 |
|
|
$ |
190.7 |
|
|
$ |
726.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,547.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Interest payments are based on LIBOR plus a margin, depending on
our financial leverage. |
|
(2) |
Includes purchase obligations. |
|
(3) |
Excludes payments for a Suezmax newbuilding on capital lease
that is scheduled to deliver in the third quarter of 2005. |
|
(4) |
Euro-denominated amounts are based on the prevailing exchange
rate as of December 31, 2004. |
|
(5) |
Interest payments are based on EURIBOR plus a margin, depending
on our financial leverage. |
95
On a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the repayment of
debt and an advance from Teekay Shipping Corporation described
in Use of Proceeds, our long-term contractual
obligations as at December 31, 2004 would have consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) | |
|
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
RasGas II purchase commitment(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124.5 |
|
|
Other U.S. Dollar-denominated obligations
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
|
|
145.8 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
264.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Dollar-denominated obligations
|
|
|
68.8 |
|
|
|
270.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
403.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-Denominated Obligations:(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Euro-denominated obligations
|
|
|
116.1 |
|
|
|
177.2 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
514.8 |
|
|
|
940.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations
|
|
$ |
184.9 |
|
|
$ |
447.7 |
|
|
$ |
45.8 |
|
|
$ |
48.2 |
|
|
$ |
50.4 |
|
|
$ |
566.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,343.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Interest payments are based on LIBOR plus a margin, depending on
our financial leverage. Please read Use of Proceeds
and the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
(2) |
Represents our estimate of the purchase price for Teekay
Shipping Corporations interest in the three RasGas II
LNG carrier newbuildings, excluding the assumption of
approximately $468.0 million of debt. Assumes Qatar Gas
Transport does not exercise its options to purchase up to 30% of
the interest in the RasGas II vessels. In connection with
this purchase, we will assume the $68.6 million of
construction installment payments due in 2007 for the last two
vessels to be delivered. |
|
(3) |
Euro-denominated amounts are based on the prevailing exchange
rate as of December 31, 2004. |
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with GAAP, which require us to make estimates in the application
of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions,
judgments and opinions. Following is a discussion of the
accounting policies that involve a high degree of judgment and
the methods of their application. For a further description of
our material accounting policies, please read Note 1 to our
historical consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus.
We recognize revenues from time charters daily over the term of
the charter as the applicable vessel operates under the charter.
We do not recognize revenues during days that the vessel is
off-hire.
In the past, we generated a portion of our revenues from voyage
charters. Within the shipping industry, the two methods used to
account for voyage revenues and expenses from voyage charters
are the percentage of completion and the completed voyage
methods. Most shipping companies, including us, use the
percentage of completion method. For each method, voyages may be
calculated on either a load-to-load or discharge-to-discharge
basis. In other words, revenues are recognized ratably either
from the beginning of when product is loaded for one voyage to
when it is loaded for another voyage, or from when product is
discharged (unloaded) at the end of one voyage to when it is
discharged after the next voyage. In applying the percentage of
completion method, we believe that, in most cases, the
discharge-to-discharge basis of calculating voyages more
accurately reflects voyage results than the load-to-load basis.
At the time of cargo discharge, we generally have information
about the next load port and expected discharge port, whereas at
the time of loading we are normally less certain what the next
load port will be. We have used this method of revenue
recognition for all spot voyages. However, we do not begin
recognizing voyage revenue until a charter has been agreed to by
the customer and us, even if the vessel has discharged its cargo
and is sailing to the anticipated load port on its next voyage.
96
|
|
|
Vessel Lives and Impairment |
The carrying value of each of our vessels represents its
original cost at the time of delivery or purchase less
depreciation or impairment charges. We depreciate our vessels on
a straight-line basis over a vessels estimated useful
life, less an estimated residual value. Depreciation is
calculated using an estimated useful life of 25 years for
Suezmax tankers and 35 years for LNG carriers, from the
date the vessel was originally delivered from the shipyard, or a
shorter period if regulations prevent us from operating the
vessels to 25 years or 35 years, respectively. In the
shipping industry, the use of a 25-year vessel life for Suezmax
tankers has become the prevailing standard. In addition, the use
of a 30- to 40-year vessel life for LNG carriers is typical.
However, the actual life of a vessel may be different, with a
shorter life potentially resulting in an impairment loss. We are
not aware of any regulatory changes or environmental liabilities
that we anticipate will have a material impact on the vessel
lives of our current fleet, other than our one single-hull
Suezmax tanker (the Granada Spirit), which we will sell
to Teekay Shipping Corporation prior to its required phase-out
under applicable regulations. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions Granada
Spirit Charter and Purchase Agreement.
The carrying values of our vessels may not represent their fair
market value at any point in time since the market prices of
second-hand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in charter
rates and the cost of newbuildings. Both charter rates and
newbuilding costs tend to be cyclical in nature. We review
vessels and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. We measure the recoverability of an asset by
comparing its carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows
that the asset is expected to generate over its remaining useful
life. If we consider a vessel or equipment to be impaired, we
recognize impairment in an amount equal to the excess of the
carrying value of the asset over its fair market value.
Generally, we drydock each LNG carrier and Suezmax tanker
every five years. In addition, a shipping society classification
intermediate survey is performed on our LNG carriers
between the second and third year of the five-year drydocking
period. We capitalize a substantial portion of the costs we
incur during drydocking and for the survey and amortize those
costs on a straight-line basis from the completion of a
drydocking or intermediate survey to the estimated completion of
the next drydocking. We expense costs related to routine repairs
and maintenance incurred during drydocking that do not improve
or extend the useful lives of the assets. When significant
drydocking expenditures occur prior to the expiration of this
period, we expense the remaining unamortized balance of the
original drydocking cost and any unamortized intermediate survey
costs in the month of the subsequent drydocking.
We utilize derivative financial instruments to reduce interest
rate risks. We do not hold or issue derivative financial
instruments for trading purposes. Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (or SFAS) No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, which was amended in June 2000 by SFAS
No. 138 and in May 2003 by SFAS No. 149, establishes
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments
and hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all
derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of
financial condition and measure those instruments at fair value.
Derivatives that are not hedges or are not designated as hedges
are adjusted to fair value through income. If the derivative is
a hedge, depending upon the nature of the hedge, changes in the
fair value of the derivatives are either offset against the fair
value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments through income,
or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged
item is recognized in income. The ineffective portion of a
derivatives change in fair value is immediately recognized
into income.
Effective January 1, 2002, goodwill and intangible assets
with indefinite lives are not amortized, but reviewed for
impairment annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators
arise. An impairment test
97
requires us to estimate future cash flows. If events or
circumstances change, including reductions in anticipated cash
flows generated by operations, goodwill could become impaired
and require a charge to earnings.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily
through our unhedged floating-rate borrowings. Significant
increases in interest rates could adversely affect our operating
margins, results of operations and our ability to service our
debt. We use interest rate swaps to reduce our exposure to
market risk from changes in interest rates. The principal
objective of these contracts is to minimize the risks and costs
associated with our floating-rate debt. As at December 31,
2004, our unhedged floating-rate borrowings totaled
$17.8 million. A 1% increase in the interest rates on that
amount would result in $0.2 million in additional annual
interest payments.
The table below provides information about our financial
instruments at December 31, 2004 that are sensitive to
changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table
presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average
interest rates by expected maturity dates. For interest rate
swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average
interest rates by expected contractual maturity dates. In
April 2005, we terminated our U.S. Dollar-denominated
interest rate swaps, and we have terminated and replaced our
Euro-denominated swaps. The contract amount and average fixed
pay rate will be adjusted accordingly.
Expected Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) | |
Long-Term Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating-rate debt
please read Contractual Obligations and
Contingencies above |
Interest Rate Swaps:(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract amount (U.S. Dollar- denominated)
|
|
$ |
6. |
5 |
|
$ |
7. |
0 |
|
|
7. |
6 |
|
$ |
8. |
2 |
|
$ |
140. |
5 |
|
$ |
158. |
5 |
|
Average fixed pay rate
|
|
|
6. |
76% |
|
|
6. |
76% |
|
|
6. |
76% |
|
|
6. |
76% |
|
|
6. |
96% |
|
|
6. |
41% |
|
Contract amount (Euro-denominated)
|
|
$ |
8. |
3 |
|
$ |
9. |
3 |
|
|
10. |
0 |
|
$ |
10. |
7 |
|
$ |
11. |
5 |
|
$ |
391. |
0 |
|
Average fixed pay rate
|
|
|
5. |
90% |
|
|
5. |
90% |
|
|
5. |
90% |
|
|
5. |
90% |
|
|
5. |
90% |
|
|
5. |
89% |
|
|
(1) |
The average variable receive rate for our interest rate swaps is
set monthly at one-month LIBOR or EURIBOR or semi-annually at
six-month LIBOR or EURIBOR. |
|
(2) |
The average fixed pay rate excludes the margin we pay on our
floating-rate debt. |
98
The following table sets forth further information about our
interest rate swap agreements, long-term debt and capital lease
obligations as at December 31, 2003 and 2004. In connection
with the repayment and replacement of our interest rate swaps in
April 2005, we no longer have obligations under our U.S.
Dollar-denominated swaps, and our Euro-denominated swaps had a
fair value, or carrying amount, of zero and a current market
rate at the time of replacement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair | |
|
|
|
|
Contract | |
|
Value/Carrying | |
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated
|
|
$ |
328.5 |
|
|
$ |
44.3 |
|
|
|
6.67% |
|
|
Euro-denominated
|
|
$ |
441.0 |
|
|
$ |
90.6 |
|
|
|
5.89% |
|
Long-Term Debt:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated
|
|
$ |
343.4 |
|
|
$ |
343.4 |
|
|
|
3.69% |
|
|
Euro-denominated
|
|
$ |
443.7 |
|
|
$ |
443.7 |
|
|
|
3.37% |
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated
|
|
$ |
295.6 |
|
|
$ |
47.8 |
|
|
|
6.71% |
|
|
Euro-denominated
|
|
$ |
349.0 |
|
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
|
5.94% |
|
Long-Term Debt:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated
|
|
$ |
371.3 |
|
|
$ |
371.3 |
|
|
|
2.21% |
|
|
Euro-denominated
|
|
$ |
372.4 |
|
|
$ |
372.4 |
|
|
|
3.27% |
|
|
|
(1) |
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for
our debt and average fixed pay rate for our swap agreements. The
average fixed pay rate excludes the margin we pay on our
floating-rate debt. |
|
(2) |
Excludes fixed-rate capital lease obligations. |
Counterparties to these financial instruments expose us to
credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance; however,
counterparties to these agreements are major financial
institutions, and we consider the risk of loss due to
nonperformance to be minimal. We do not require collateral from
these institutions. We do not hold or issue interest rate swaps
for trading purposes.
We are exposed to the impact of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. Revenues generated from three of our time
charters are either partially or solely denominated in Euros. In
2004, we earned approximately 23.4 million Euros
($29.1 million) in Euro-denominated revenues. With the
delivery of two LNG carriers during 2004, we expect this to
increase to approximately 47 million Euros
($61 million) per year beginning in 2005. In addition,
approximately 85% of our vessel operating expenses are
denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function of the
nationality of our crew. We expect a similar proportion of our
vessel operating expenses to continue to be Euro-denominated in
2005. Historically, almost all of our general and administrative
expenses have been denominated in Euros. However, we expect this
to decrease somewhat during 2005, as we will be incurring
additional general and administrative expenses that are
denominated in both Canadian Dollars and U.S. Dollars. As
at December 31, 2004, we had approximately
$443.7 million of Euro-denominated debt. We have not
entered into any forward contracts or similar arrangements to
protect against the currency risk of foreign
currency-denominated revenues, expenses, monetary assets or
monetary liabilities. See Overview
Important Financial and Operational Terms and
Concepts Foreign Currency Fluctuations.
99
INDUSTRY
We obtained the information in this prospectus about the
liquefied natural gas and seaborne oil transportation industries
from several independent outside sources, including the Energy
Information Administration (or EIA), an independent
statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of
Energy; Clarkson Research Studies (or CRS), the
research division of H. Clarkson & Co. Ltd.; the
International Energy Agency (or IEA), an autonomous
energy forum for 26 industrial countries; and the U.S.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (or FERC). Much of
the most recent government data available regarding the
liquefied natural gas industry is for 2002 and 2003.
Liquefied Natural Gas
Natural gas is the worlds fastest-growing primary energy
source. In 2001, the consumption of natural gas accounted for
approximately 23% of world energy consumption, and the EIA
expects global consumption to grow from 90 trillion cubic feet
(or Tcf) in 2001 to 118 Tcf in 2015, representing a
compounded annual growth rate of 2.0%. Economic growth, the
abundance of natural gas and its clean-burning nature and the
wide applicability of natural gas as a fuel source have been
driving this growth. Liquefied natural gas (or LNG)
provides a cost-effective means for transporting natural gas
overseas by supercooling it to a liquid form, which reduces its
volume to approximately 1/600th of its gaseous state. Between
1993 and 2003, the annual amount of LNG shipped internationally
increased by a 7.0% compounded annual growth rate, from
3.0 Tcf to 5.9 Tcf, as a result of improvements in
liquefaction and regasification technologies, decreases in LNG
shipping costs and increases in demand from consuming regions
located far from natural gas reserves. The IEA expects the LNG
shipping industry to continue to grow rapidly, with worldwide
LNG trade projected to increase by a 6.6% compounded annual
growth rate from 2002 to 2010, with annual international LNG
shipments reaching 8.8 Tcf in 2010. Historically, LNG trade
primarily centered around the major LNG exporters of Indonesia,
Malaysia and Algeria and the major LNG importers of Japan, South
Korea and Taiwan. However, we expect the Middle East and Africa
to continue to be increasingly important LNG exporting areas and
Russia, with its vast natural gas reserves, to become an LNG
exporter. We also expect Europe and North America to be among
the major LNG importers. To meet projected LNG shipping demand,
LNG Shipping Solutions Ltd. estimates that the world LNG carrier
fleet must expand to approximately 364 carriers by 2010
from its current size of 180 existing vessels and
108 vessels under order or construction as of April 1,
2005.
Overview of Natural Gas
Market
Natural gas is used primarily to generate electricity and as a
heating source. Natural gas is abundant, with worldwide natural
gas reserves estimated at 6,000 Tcf, or 67 times the
volume of natural gas consumed in 2001.
Consumption of natural gas has been increasing steadily and is
projected to continue to rise due to a number of factors, such
as:
|
|
|
|
|
global economic growth and increasing energy demand; |
|
|
|
natural gas being a cleaner burning fuel than coal and oil,
contributing to an increase in the development of power plants
that run on natural gas; |
|
|
|
the wide applicability of natural gas as a fuel source, along
with consumer desires to diversify fuel sources; and |
|
|
|
market deregulation. |
100
The following chart shows historical and projected world natural
gas demand as of 2004.
World Natural Gas Demand
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, April 2004.
As consumption of natural gas continues to rise, there is a
growing disparity between the increase in forecasted consumption
by industrialized nations and their production levels. This
disparity will likely cause major consuming countries to rely on
imports for a greater portion of natural gas. Importers will
need to decide whether to import natural gas through a pipeline,
if possible, or by ship.
Much of the worlds natural gas is considered
stranded because it is located in regions distant
from consuming markets. A pipeline is usually the more
economical means of transporting natural gas from producing
regions if the consuming market can be served by pipeline and is
not too distant from the natural gas reserves. For some areas
that lack adequate pipelines such as Japan, South
Korea and Taiwan LNG may be the most economical or
only feasible form of natural gas that may be imported. For
other areas that have extensive existing pipelines
such as Europe and North America future demand for
natural gas is expected to exceed available reserves and
production capacity within the area served by the pipeline
network, which may result in additional LNG imports.
Overview of LNG
Market
LNG shipping provides a cost-effective means for transporting
natural gas overseas. After natural gas is transported by
pipeline from production fields to a liquefaction facility, it
is supercooled to a temperature of approximately
-260 degrees Fahrenheit. This process reduces its volume to
approximately 1/600th of its volume in a gaseous state. The
reduced volume facilitates economical storage and transportation
by ship over long distances, enabling countries with limited
natural gas reserves or limited access to long-distance
transmission pipelines to meet their demand for natural gas. The
LNG is transported overseas in specially built tanks on
double-hulled ships to a receiving terminal, where it is
offloaded and stored in heavily insulated tanks. In
regasification facilities at the receiving terminal, the LNG is
returned to its gaseous state (or regasified)
and then shipped by pipeline for distribution to natural gas
customers.
101
The following diagram shows the flow of natural gas and LNG from
production to regasification.
LNG has existed since the early 1900s. LNG was first carried by
ship in 1959, and the international LNG trade began in the early
1960s, primarily involving the shipment of LNG from Algeria to
the United Kingdom.
In recent years, the demand for LNG has increased as natural gas
demand has continued to exceed production in mature gas
producing regions, as the cost of liquefying and regasifying has
declined due to improved technology, efficiency gains and more
competition, and as shipping costs have declined due primarily
to lower vessel construction costs. The following chart shows
the volume of LNG shipped internationally between 1993 and 2003.
World LNG Imports
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, 1994-2004.
LNG Supply
LNG Exporters. A limited number of countries
currently export LNG. In 2003, 12 countries exported a total of
5.9 Tcf of natural gas as LNG worldwide. In 1997, there
were nine countries that exported 4.0 Tcf of natural gas as
LNG.
102
Historically, the top three LNG exporters have been Indonesia,
Algeria and Malaysia. The following table shows the amount and
worldwide percentage of LNG exported by country or region in
2003 and the amount and percentage changes in LNG volume shipped
by each country from 2000 to 2003.
Major Exporters of LNG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
2003 Percentage |
|
|
|
Change in Country | |
|
Change in | |
|
|
of Worldwide |
|
|
|
Exports From | |
|
Exports From | |
Country |
|
Market |
|
2003 Exports | |
|
2000 to 2003 | |
|
2000 to 20003 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(billion cubic feet) | |
|
|
|
(billion cubic feet) | |
Indonesia
|
|
21% |
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Algeria
|
|
16 |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Malaysia
|
|
14 |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Qatar
|
|
11 |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
Other Middle East
|
|
10 |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Trinidad & Tobago
|
|
7 |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Nigeria
|
|
7 |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Australia
|
|
6 |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Brunei
|
|
6 |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
United States
|
|
1 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Libya
|
|
Less than 1% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, 2000-2004.
Export Capacity. A countrys ability to
export LNG depends on its access to natural gas reserves in
excess of its internal consumption and any exports via pipelines
and on its capacity to liquefy natural gas.
Natural Gas Reserves. World natural gas reserves
are estimated at 6,000 Tcf, or 67 times the volume of
natural gas consumed in 2001. In addition, through improved
exploratory technologies and drilling of new wells, additional
natural gas is discovered each year. However, much of the
natural gas is considered stranded because it is
located in regions distant from consuming markets.
The following chart shows the percentage of estimated natural
gas reserves by country as of January 2004.
World Natural Gas Reserves
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, April 2004.
103
Liquefaction Facilities. At the end of 2002,
almost 47% of global natural gas liquefaction capacity was
located in the Asia Pacific region, followed by 25% in Africa
and 21% in the Middle East. Global annual liquefaction capacity
is projected to expand 46% from 135 million metric tons in
2003 to 197 million metric tons by 2007, based on
facilities currently under construction. Significant new LNG
projects or expansion of existing projects are underway in
Egypt, Qatar, Nigeria, Australia, Trinidad and Tobago, and
Russia. The following chart highlights regional liquefaction
capacity as of October 2003 and expected capacity by 2007 as a
result of facilities then under construction. In addition, the
following chart shows facilities that the EIA reported as
proposed for development or in planning stages as of October
2003, but which had not then commenced construction. There is no
assurance that any of the proposed facilities will actually be
constructed, as a result of a failure to obtain financing, a
project sponsors decision not to proceed or otherwise.
Global LNG Liquefaction Facilities
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, December 2003.
While LNG exports primarily have been from the Asia Pacific
region, primarily Indonesia and Malaysia, the Middle East and
Russia control a substantial portion (over 65%) of the
worlds natural gas reserves. With gas-rich areas such as
these regions and countries constructing or expanding LNG
liquefaction facilities, we expect the predominant supply of LNG
will shift.
LNG Consumers
LNG Importers. Countries that consume major
quantities of natural gas but lack established transmission
pipelines or are located far from supplying markets may import
LNG as the most economical or only feasible means to obtain
natural gas. For instance, natural gas supplied 12% of
Japans energy needs in 2002 even though Japan has little
of its own supply and no currently feasible means of
establishing a pipeline from producing natural gas fields. In
addition, countries that have established pipelines but have
mature production fields or are not expected to have sufficient
production available to meet continued demand, such as the
United States, may import LNG as an alternative supply of
natural gas.
104
The following table shows the amount and percentage of LNG
imported by country in 2003 and the amount and percentage
changes in LNG volume consumed by each country from 2000 to 2003.
Major Importers of LNG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
2003 Percentage | |
|
|
|
Change in Country | |
|
Change in | |
|
|
of Worldwide | |
|
2003 | |
|
Imports From | |
|
Imports From | |
Country |
|
Market | |
|
Imports | |
|
2000 to 2003 | |
|
2000 to 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(billion cubic feet) | |
|
|
|
(billion cubic feet) | |
Japan
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
2,824 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
167 |
|
South Korea
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Spain
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
United States
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
France
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
Taiwan
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Italy
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Turkey
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Belgium
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Other Western Europe
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Other Americas
|
|
Less than 1% |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, 2000-2004.
Import Capacity. A countrys LNG import
capacity depends largely upon its regasification facilities and
pipeline infrastructure. In October 2003, 76% of the existing
global regasification capacity was located in the Asia Pacific
region, followed by 15% in Europe and 9% in North America. Most
countries with existing LNG import terminals are expanding their
import capacity either through construction of new facilities or
expansion of existing facilities. India has constructed its
first regasification facility, China is constructing its first
facility and the United Kingdom is constructing its first
facility since retiring facilities established in the early
1960s. Mexico has approved a regasification project. As of
October 2003, LNG import terminals were under construction in
eight countries and proposed in another 12 countries that
would, if constructed, expand existing global LNG import
terminal capacity by a total of approximately 50%.
105
The following chart highlights regional import capacity and
expected capacity as of October 2003 as a result of
regasification facilities then under construction. In addition,
the following chart shows facilities that the EIA reported as
proposed for development or in planning stages as of October
2003, but which had not then commenced construction. There is no
assurance that any of the proposed facilities will actually be
constructed, as a result of a failure to obtain financing or
regulatory approvals, a project sponsors decision not to
proceed or otherwise.
Global LNG Regasification Facilities
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, December 2003.
U.S. Import Capacity. The United States imported
10.6 million metric tons of LNG in 2003, compared to
4.8 million metric tons in 2002, the majority of which came
from Trinidad and Tobago in both years. There are currently four
LNG import terminals in the United States, with each of those
facilities either recently expanded or approved for expansion by
2008. In addition, in March 2005, Excelerate Energy, LLC
commenced operation of its Energy Bridge LNG regasification port
in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately 100 miles from the
Louisiana shoreline. Also as of March 2005, five additional
terminals had been approved for construction in Freeport, Texas;
Hackberry, Louisiana; Sabine, Louisiana; and at Gulf Landing and
Port Pelican, each off the coast of Louisiana. Over 25 new
terminals were also in the proposed or planning phases. In
addition, a terminal in the Gulf of Mexico has been approved for
construction. If constructed, these terminals will transport
natural gas by pipeline to the United States following
regasification of LNG received at the terminal.
106
LNG Trade Routes
Principal trade routes for LNG shipping include the South
Pacific Basin (Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia and Brunei) and
the Middle East to the North Pacific Basin (Japan, South Korea
and Taiwan), and North Africa and Nigeria to Europe and the
United States. The following map indicates the major LNG
shipping trade routes between LNG exporters and importers during
2002.
Note: Map indicates annual flows greater than 5 billion
cubic feet for imports into the United States and annual flows
greater than 15 billion cubic feet for imports into all
other countries. Numbers in map above represent annual LNG
imports in billion cubic feet.
Source: U.S. Department of Energy.
We expect a significant increase in the amount of LNG shipped
from major gas producing regions such as the Middle East, Africa
and Russia to regions with insufficient gas production to meet
projected demand, such as Europe and North America.
LNG Shipping Industry
LNG Carriers. LNG carriers transport LNG
internationally between liquefaction facilities and import
terminals. These double-hulled vessels include a sophisticated
containment system that holds and insulates the LNG
so it maintains its liquid form. LNG that evaporates during the
voyage and converts to natural gas (called boil-off) is
used as fuel to help propel the carrier.
Containment Systems. Since 1965, there have been six
different types of containment systems used on LNG carriers. The
two most prevalent systems are:
|
|
|
|
|
The Moss Rosenberg spherical system, which was designed
in the 1970s and is used by nearly half of the current LNG
fleet. In this system, multiple self-supporting, spherical tanks
are built independent of the carrier and arranged inside its
hull. |
|
|
|
The Gaz Transport membrane system, which is built inside
the carrier and consists of insulation between thin primary and
secondary barriers. The membrane is designed to accommodate
thermal expansion and contraction without overstressing the
membrane. |
107
Illustrations of these systems are included below:
|
|
|
Moss Rosenberg System |
|
Gaz Transport System |
|
|
|
Most new vessels, including all of our vessels, are being built
with membrane systems, such as the Gaz Transport system. This
trend is primarily a result of the fact that canal fees and
related costs associated with passage through the Suez Canal
(required for many long-haul trade routes) are lower for
carriers with membrane systems. In addition, membrane system
vessels operate more efficiently since the spheres on the Moss
Rosenberg systems create more wind resistance.
Carrying Capacity. The cargo capacity of an LNG carrier
is measured in cubic meters. Although the average capacity of
most of the carriers in the existing world fleet is
approximately 117,100 cubic meters, the average capacity for
newbuildings on order as of April 1, 2005 was approximately
149,400 cubic meters, and shipyards have contracted to
build vessels with capacities of 200,000 or more cubic meters.
Expected Lifespan. New LNG carriers are generally
expected to have a lifespan of approximately 40 years.
Unlike the oil tanker industry, there currently are no
regulations that require the phase-out from trading of LNG
carriers after they reach a certain age.
LNG Fleet. As of April 1, 2005, the worldwide LNG
fleet included 180 vessels, with an average age of approximately
13.5 years.
Newbuildings. As of April 1, 2005, there were
108 additional LNG carriers under construction or order for
delivery through 2009, as detailed in the following table.
LNG Orderbook and Delivery Schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery Year |
|
Number of Vessels | |
|
Total Vessel Capacity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(cubic meters) | |
2005
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
2,418,100 |
|
2006
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
3,142,100 |
|
2007
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
5,399,300 |
|
2008 and after
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
5,171,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
16,130,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: CRS, April 1, 2005.
To meet projected LNG shipping demand, LNG Shipping Solutions
Ltd. estimates that the world LNG fleet must expand to
approximately 364 vessels by 2010.
LNG Shipyards. Only twelve shipyards in the world
currently build LNG vessels, five of which are located in Japan,
four in South Korea and one each in China, France and Spain.
Industry analysts generally believe that existing newbuilding
orders will keep most major shipyards at full capacity until the
end of 2007, with the average lead time for delivery of a
newbuilding being approximately three years from the time of the
order. The South Korean shipyards, which are building
approximately 70% of the LNG newbuildings on order, are
expanding existing capacity to capture additional projected
demand.
LNG Carrier Prices. Shipbuilding prices have been
cyclical due to factors such as available shipyard capacity,
demand for newbuildings, currency exchange rates, the cost of
steel and other vessel materials and general economic
conditions. Prices for new LNG carriers fell significantly from
approximately $263 million in 1992 for a 125,000 cubic
meter carrier to approximately $172 million in 2004 for a
108
138,000 cubic meter carrier as a result of expansion in
shipbuilding capacity, price competition between shipyards and
economies of scale. However, rising steel and equipment costs,
along with greater demand for newbuildings, has led to an
increase in prices since late 2003. Increasing LNG carrier
demand may contribute to further price increases. The following
chart illustrates changes in the average cost to build a new LNG
carrier since 1992 based on sizes generally considered average
or standard for LNG carriers within the respective years.
LNG Newbuilding Prices
Source: CRS, April 1, 2005.
Competition. The two main types of LNG fleet
operators that provide international LNG transportation services
are private and state-controlled energy and utilities companies
that generally operate captive fleets, and independent ship
owners and operators. Many major energy companies compete
directly with independent owners by transporting LNG for third
parties in addition to their own LNG. Given the complex,
long-term nature of LNG projects, major energy companies
historically have transported LNG through their captive fleets.
However, independent fleet operators recently have been winning
an increasing percentage of charters for new or expanded LNG
projects as major energy companies continue to divest non-core
businesses. As of April 1, 2005, independent owners owned
approximately 45% of the world LNG fleet, including
approximately 25% owned by independent Japanese and South Korean
owners. Approximately 60% of newbuilding orders are from
independent owners. We believe that the increasing ownership of
the world LNG fleet by independent owners is attributable in
part to the desire of some major energy companies to limit their
commitment to the transportation business, which is non-core to
their operations, and to the cost of financing of new LNG
carriers in addition to the high construction costs of
liquefaction and regasification facilities.
109
The following chart lists the top fifteen LNG carrier owners as
of April 1, 2005.
LNG Carrier Owners
Source: CRS, April 1, 2005.
Operators of LNG carriers compete primarily based on:
|
|
|
|
|
shipping industry relationships and reputation for customer
service and safety; |
|
|
|
LNG shipping experience and quality of ship operations
(including cost effectiveness); |
|
|
|
quality and experience of seafaring crew; |
|
|
|
the ability to finance LNG carriers at competitive rates and
financial stability generally; |
|
|
|
relationships with shipyards and the ability to get suitable
berths; |
|
|
|
construction management experience, including the ability to
obtain on-time delivery of new vessels according to customer
specifications; |
|
|
|
willingness to accept operational risk pursuant to the charter
contract, such as allowing termination of the charter for force
majeure events; and |
|
|
|
competitiveness of bids in terms of overall price. |
In addition, some charterers, including state-controlled
entities and Japanese energy and utility companies, have in the
past shown a preference for owners and operators of the same
nationality.
LNG Shipping Contracts. LNG carriers are
usually hired (or chartered) to carry LNG pursuant to
time charter contracts, where a vessel is hired for a fixed
period of time, usually between 20 and 25 years, and the
charter rate is payable to the owner on a monthly basis. LNG
shipping historically has been transacted with these long-term,
fixed-rate time charter contracts because:
|
|
|
|
|
LNG projects are expensive and typically involve an integrated
chain of dedicated facilities and cooperative activities;
accordingly, the overall success of an LNG project depends
heavily on long-range planning and coordination of project
activities, including marine transportation; |
|
|
|
LNG carriers are expensive to build, so the cash-flow from
long-term, fixed-rate charters supports the vessel financing; |
110
|
|
|
|
|
most end users of LNG are utility companies, power stations and
petrochemical producers that depend on reliable and
uninterrupted delivery of LNG; and |
|
|
|
the limited size of the world LNG fleet and number of
independent operators historically has not been conducive to
development of a spot market for LNG transportation services. |
We define LNG charters for a period of less than five years as
short-term, LNG charters for a period of between five and
10 years as medium term, and LNG charters of more than
10 years as long-term.
Although most shipping requirements for new LNG projects
continue to be provided on a long-term basis, spot voyages
(typically consisting of a single voyage) and short-term time
charters of less than 12 months duration grew from less
than 2% of the market in the late 1990s to almost 11% in 2003.
Growth in the short-term LNG market has been driven primarily by:
|
|
|
|
|
increases in new LNG production capacity that is not fully
committed to a particular importer; |
|
|
|
increases in seasonal demand for LNG due to, for example,
reliance on natural gas as a commercial and residential heating
source or for power generation during times of peak electricity
usage; |
|
|
|
the increasing availability of LNG carriers not committed to a
particular project, either as a result of the termination of
existing time charters without a replacement charter or the
building of new carriers on a speculative basis; |
|
|
|
increased emphasis on delivery flexibility by importers and
related increased charter contract flexibility; and |
|
|
|
unforeseen disruptions to production capacity in some exporting
countries. |
Shipping Rates. Although LNG and natural gas
prices are generally benchmarked to competing fuels, LNG
shipping rates are not tied to a particular market, as is the
case with crude oil tanker rates. The cost of LNG depends on the
cost of natural gas and LNG production, the cost of liquefaction
and regasification facilities and the cost to ship the LNG.
Shipping the LNG typically accounts for approximately 10% to 30%
of its cost, primarily due to the cost of building an LNG
carrier. Long-term LNG charter rates typically are determined
based on the price of the carrier and its financing and
operating costs. Average daily rates at the end of 2003 were
generally between $55,000 and $65,000, with a range of $27,000
to $150,000, according to the EIA.
Safety and Security. LNG shipping generally has
been safe relative to other forms of commercial marine
transportation. In the past 40 years, there has been no
significant accident or cargo spillage involving an LNG carrier,
even though over 33,000 LNG voyages have been made during
that time.
LNG is non-toxic and non-explosive in its liquid state. LNG only
becomes explosive, or flammable, when heated and vaporized, and
then only when in a confined space within a narrow range of
concentrations in the air (5% to 15%). Greater concentrations of
natural gas do not contain enough oxygen to sustain a flame,
while lesser concentrations of natural gas contain enough oxygen
to dilute the natural gas too much for it to ignite. The risks
and hazards from an LNG spill will vary depending on the size of
the spill, environmental conditions and the site at which the
spill occurs. Hazards can include freeze burns to the
ships crew and people nearby and potential damage to the
LNG carrier from contact with LNG. Once a spill occurs, LNG
vaporizes and subsequent ignition of the vapor cloud could cause
fires and overpressures that could injure people or cause damage
to the LNG carriers structure, other LNG carriers or
nearby structures.
The risk of accidental LNG spills which could result from such
events as groundings of carriers or collisions, is low and
generally manageable with current safety policies and practices.
However, given the increasing number and frequency of LNG
carrier deliveries to ports across the United States, concerns
about the potential for an accidental spill or release of LNG
have increased. In addition, since the September 11, 2001
terrorist attacks, concerns have increased over the impact an
attack on targets such as LNG carriers could have on public
safety and property.
111
There have been some safety-related incidents involving
LNG liquefaction and regasification facilities, including
explosions in Algeria in 2004 caused by defective steam boilers.
As LNG infrastructure is expanded, some communities in the
United States are protesting the building of new regasification
facilities based on safety and security concerns, including the
possibility that LNG terminals will be targets of terrorism.
Regulations may be adopted to enhance risk assessment and
security requirements for LNG carriers and facilities.
Energy Bridge. Regasification technology under
development could minimize safety and security concerns
associated with the importation of LNG. In March 2005,
Excelerate Energy, LLC commenced operation of its Energy Bridge
LNG regasification port in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately 100
miles from the Louisiana shoreline. The Energy Bridge is the
worlds first offshore LNG regasification terminal. The
relatively untested technology requires special LNG vessels that
facilitate on-board regasification. Excelerate delivers the
resulting natural gas through an underwater pipeline into the
U.S. pipeline network. If the Energy Bridge is commercially
successful, other energy companies may develop similar offshore
regasification terminals.
Regulation. In the United States, regasification
facilities must conform to standards set by the
U.S. Department of Transportation, the U.S. Coast
Guard, the FERC, the National Fire Protection Association, state
utility commissions, port authorities and other state and local
agencies. The U.S. Department of Transportation and the
Coast Guard security measures for land-based and marine LNG
terminals require security patrols, protective enclosures,
lighting, monitoring equipment and alternative power sources.
Coast Guard regulations also prohibit other ships from
approaching LNG carriers while traveling within the Coast
Guards jurisdiction or docked at U.S. terminals.
U.S. regasification terminals require approval by the FERC for
onshore facilities and the U.S. Coast Guard for offshore
facilities, in addition to other federal agency and applicable
state or local regulatory approvals, including environmental
permits, the obtaining of which generally takes at least 12 to
18 months from filing an application. If there is
significant public opposition to a project, the approval process
may take much longer. Even prior to the filing of an
application, the approval process includes, among other things,
environmental assessments and public input and a pre-filing
process to identify potential environmental, permitting and land
use issues. Members of the public who formally intervene in the
approval process may challenge final approval.
Crude Oil Shipping Suezmax Tankers
Overview
Oil has been the worlds primary energy source for a number
of decades. In 2001, the consumption of oil accounted for
approximately 39% of world energy consumption, and the EIA
expects daily global consumption to increase from an average of
77.1 million barrels in 2001 to approximately
100.5 million barrels in 2015. Although the consumption of
natural gas has increased relative to oil, daily oil demand has
grown from an average of approximately 76 million barrels
to approximately 82 million barrels from 1999 to 2004,
primarily as a result of global economic growth. Oil reserves
remain abundant and, like natural gas, tend to be located in
regions far from major consuming countries, which contributes to
oil tanker demand.
Seaborne crude oil transportation is a mature industry. The two
main types of oil tanker operators are major oil companies
(including state-owned companies) that generally operate captive
fleets, and independent operators that charter out their vessels
for voyage or time-charter use. Most conventional oil tankers
controlled by independent fleet operators are hired for one or a
few voyages at a time at fluctuating market rates based on the
existing tanker supply and demand. These charter rates are
extremely sensitive to this balance of supply and demand, and
small changes in tanker utilization have historically led to
relatively large short-term rate changes. Long-term, fixed-rate
charters for crude oil transportation, such as those applicable
to our Suezmax tanker fleet, are less typical in the industry.
As used in this discussion,
112
conventional oil tankers exclude those vessels that
can carry dry bulk and ore, tankers that currently are used for
storage purposes and shuttle tankers that are designed to
transport oil from offshore production platforms to onshore
storage and refinery facilities.
The majority of crude oil tankers range in size from
approximately 80,000 to approximately 320,000 deadweight
tonnes (or dwt). Suezmax tankers are the mid-size of the
various primary oil tanker types, typically sized from 120,000
to 200,000 dwt. According to CRS, as of April 1, 2005,
the world tanker fleet included 268 conventional Suezmax
vessels, representing approximately 12% of worldwide oil tanker
capacity, excluding tankers under 10,000 dwt. Most Suezmax
tankers trade in the Atlantic region, which accounts for
approximately 80% of the Suezmax market.
Oil Tanker Demand
Oil tanker demand is a function of several factors, including
the locations of oil production, refining and consumption and
world oil demand and supply. Tanker demand is based on the
amount of crude oil transported in tankers and the distance over
which the oil is transported.
Transportation Distance. The distance over which
oil is transported is determined by seaborne trading and
distribution patterns, which are principally influenced by the
relative advantages of the various sources of production and
locations of consumption. Seaborne trading patterns are also
periodically influenced by geopolitical events, such as wars,
hostilities and trade embargoes that divert tankers from normal
trading patterns, as well as by inter-regional oil trading
activity created by oil supply and demand imbalances.
Traditionally, the level of exports from the Middle East has had
a strong effect on the tanker market as a whole due to the
relatively long distance between this supply source and typical
discharge points.
Oil Demand. The overall increase in world oil
demand since 1999 has positively affected the market for
seaborne oil transportation. Demand for oil is driven by the
level of economic activity and industrial production. The
following table indicates the geographic breakdown of world oil
demand during the past five years and estimated demand for
2005.
World Oil Demand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999 | |
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005E | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(millions of barrels per day) | |
OECD* North America
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
OECD Europe
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
OECD Pacific
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total OECD
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
Total Non-OECD
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total World Demand
|
|
|
76.0 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
84.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: IEA, March 2005.
|
|
* |
OECD indicates countries that are members of the international
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. |
Oil Supply. The worlds oil supply is
concentrated in the Middle East, followed by North America and
the former Soviet Union. As of January 2004, the Middle East
controlled approximately 57% of the worlds proven oil
reserves. For March 2005, the Middle East accounted for
approximately 30% of global oil production. The size of its
reserves, together with its currently underutilized production
capacity, suggests that the Middle East may supply the largest
percentage of oil or any growth in world oil consumption. In
addition, the IEA estimates growth in non-OPEC oil production
for 2005 from the former Soviet Union, Africa and Latin America,
locations that are generally well-suited for Suezmax tanker
transportation, which could favorably affect demand for Suezmax
tankers.
113
Oil Tanker Supply
The supply of oil tankers is a function of new vessel
deliveries, vessel scrapping and the conversion or loss of
tonnage.
The level of newbuilding orders is a function primarily of
newbuilding prices in relation to current and prospective
charter market conditions. Available shipyard capacity for
newbuildings is another factor that affects tanker supply. Most
major shipyards have sold their newbuilding berths through 2007,
leaving little available capacity. Rising steel and equipment
costs, along with competition for newbuilding berths from
shipping sectors other than oil transportation, led to an
increase in newbuilding contract prices during 2004.
At any point in time, the level of scrapping activity is a
function primarily of scrapping prices in relation to current
and prospective charter market conditions and operating, repair
and survey costs. Industry regulations also affect scrapping
levels. For example, the United Nations International
Maritime Organization (or IMO) amended regulations in
2003 to accelerate the phase-out of certain pre-1982 single-hull
vessels to 2005 from 2007. IMO regulations are expected to cause
over 30% of the existing world tanker fleet to be phased out by
2015. In addition to IMO regulation, the United States Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 requires that all oil tankers entering
U.S. waterways be exclusively double-hulled by 2015.
Aging vessels typically require substantial repairs and
maintenance to conform to industry standards, including repairs
made in connection with special surveys, which involve periodic,
thorough inspections. These surveys are part of a certification
process of classification societies, and a vessel must be
certified as in-class to continue to trade.
Insurance companies and customers rely to some degree on the
survey and classification regime to provide reasonable assurance
of a vessels seaworthiness. Because the cost of
maintaining a vessel in-class rises substantially as the age of
the vessel increases, vessel owners often conclude that it is
more economical to scrap an older vessel than to upgrade it to
maintain its in-class certification. In addition, the economics
of operating older vessels are adversely affected by customer
demand for the safety and reliability associated with more
modern vessels, coupled with the higher charter rates and
operating cost efficiencies that are typically available to
newer vessels.
Types of Crude Oil
Tankers
The world crude oil tanker fleet is generally divided into the
following types of tankers based on deadweight tonnes:
|
|
|
|
|
Ultra Large Crude Carriers (or ULCCs), of
320,000 dwt or more; |
|
|
|
Very Large Crude Carriers (or VLCCs), of 200,000 to
320,000 dwt; |
|
|
|
Suezmax tankers of 120,000 to 200,000 dwt; |
|
|
|
Aframax tankers of 80,000 to 120,000 dwt; and |
|
|
|
Smaller tankers (such as Panamax and Handysize) of less than
80,000 dwt. |
To benefit from economies of scale, tanker charterers
transporting crude oil typically charter the largest tanker
available in the market that is appropriate for the intended
journey. Factors that charterers consider include the
charterers preference to use larger tankers for
longer-haul trades and smaller tankers for medium to short-haul
trades, port and canal size restrictions and cargo sizes.
Suezmax tankers engage in, and realize economies of scale on,
long-haul crude oil routes as well as medium-haul crude oil
routes, such as from West Africa and the North Sea to the east
coast of the United States.
114
Suezmax Tankers
Expected Lifespan. New Suezmax tankers are
generally expected to have a lifespan of approximately 25 to
30 years, based on estimated hull fatigue life. However,
U.S. and international regulations require the earlier phase-out
of existing vessels that are not double-hulled, regardless of
their expected lifespan. Approximately 71% of the current world
conventional Suezmax fleet is double-hulled. All of our Suezmax
tankers under long-term charter are double-hulled. Our
single-hulled vessel (the Granada Spirit) will be sold to
Teekay Shipping Corporation no later than the earlier of
December 31, 2005 and delivery of our double-hulled
newbuilding (the Toledo Spirit), scheduled for delivery
in the third quarter of 2005.
Suezmax Fleet. As of April 1, 2005, the world
Suezmax tanker fleet consisted of 330 vessels, of which
268 vessels were conventional tankers with an average age
of 9.2 years. The following table illustrates the age of
the conventional Suezmax world fleet.
Conventional Suezmax Fleet Age Profile
Source: CRS, April 1, 2005.
Newbuildings. As of April 1, 2005, there were
72 conventional Suezmax newbuildings on order for delivery
until 2008. Delivery of a vessel typically occurs within three
years after ordering. Shipyards worldwide construct Suezmax
tankers, with only a limited number that also construct LNG
carriers and other size oil tankers.
The world Suezmax fleet primarily consists of captive fleets of
major oil companies, including state-owned companies, and
independent tanker fleets. Independent owners control the
majority of the conventional Suezmax fleet, with four major oil
companies owning Suezmax vessels. The following table shows the
largest operators of conventional Suezmax tankers as of
April 1, 2005, ranked by number of ships. These six Suezmax
operators control approximately 38.8% of the existing
conventional Suezmax fleet.
115
Major Suezmax Conventional Tanker
Operators(1)
Source: CRS, April 1, 2005.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Conventional oil tankers exclude those vessels that can carry
dry bulk and ore, tankers that currently are used for storage
purposes and shuttle tankers that are designed to transport oil
from offshore production platforms to onshore storage and
refinery facilities. |
|
|
(2) |
Alliance Chartering operates a pool of tankers owned by OMI
Corporation, Frontline Ltd., Sonangol Group, and Ernst Jacob. |
|
|
(3) |
Data for Teekay Shipping Corporation includes our Suezmax
tankers. |
Competition in the Suezmax tanker market is intense and affected
by the availability and suitability of other size vessels that
compete in the Suezmax tanker market. ULCCs, VLCCs, Aframax-size
vessels and Panamax-size vessels all can compete for many of the
same charters for which Suezmax tankers compete. Competition in
this market is primarily based on:
|
|
|
|
|
price; |
|
|
|
location (for single-voyage or short-term charters); |
|
|
|
the size, age, condition and acceptability of the vessel; |
|
|
|
oil tanker shipping experience and quality of ship operations;
and |
|
|
|
the size of an operating fleet, with larger fleets allowing for
greater vessel substitution, availability and customer service. |
Suezmax tankers are particularly well-suited for medium-haul
crude oil routes, such as from West Africa and the North Sea to
the east coast of the United States.
Because all of the vessels in our Suezmax fleet are subject to
long-term, fixed-rate charters (other than the Granada
Spirit, which Teekay Shipping corporation has agreed to
purchase upon delivery of our Suezmax newbuilding the Toledo
Spirit, scheduled for the third quarter of 2005), we do not
expect to compete for deployment of our Suezmax vessels until
the first charter ends in 2015.
Suezmax voyages are predominantly conducted on short-term
contracts and spot pricing. Spot charters involve the chartering
of a specific vessel for one or a few voyages. We define oil
tanker charters for a period of less than two years as
short-term, charters for a period of between two and five years
as medium-term and oil tanker charters for a period of more than
five years as long-term.
116
BUSINESS
Overview
We are an international provider of liquefied natural gas (or
LNG) and crude oil marine transportation services. We
were formed by Teekay Shipping Corporation, the worlds
largest owner and operator of medium-sized crude oil tankers, to
expand its operations in the LNG shipping sector.
Our fleet consists of four LNG carriers and five Suezmax-class
crude oil tankers. All our vessels are double-hulled, other than
the Granada Spirit, a Suezmax tanker that Teekay Shipping
Corporation has agreed to purchase from us no later than upon
delivery of our new Suezmax tanker, scheduled for the third
quarter of 2005. Our fleet is young, with an average age of
approximately two years for our LNG carriers and
approximately four years for our Suezmax tankers (excluding
the Granada Spirit), compared to world averages of
13.5 years and 9.2 years, respectively, as of
April 1, 2005.
All of our vessels operate under long-term, fixed-rate time
charters with major energy and utility companies, other than the
Granada Spirit, which will operate on a short-term,
fixed-rate time charter until its sale to Teekay Shipping
Corporation. The average remaining term for our long-term
charters is approximately 20 years for our LNG carriers and
approximately 16 years for our Suezmax tankers, subject, in
certain circumstances, to termination or purchase rights.
In addition to our new Suezmax tanker scheduled for delivery in
the third quarter of 2005, we have also agreed to acquire from
Teekay Shipping Corporation all of its interest in three new LNG
carriers, which interest will be no less than 70%. We expect to
take delivery of the three LNG newbuildings between the fourth
quarter of 2006 and the first half of 2007. Upon their delivery,
the three LNG carriers will provide transportation services to
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II) (or
RasGas II), a joint venture between Qatar Petroleum and
ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil Corporation,
established for the purpose of expanding LNG production in
Qatar. Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase RasGas II
Interest.
All of our newbuildings will be double-hulled and will operate
under long-term, fixed-rate time charters with major energy and
utility companies. The term of each of our charters for our LNG
and Suezmax newbuildings is 20 years from delivery of the
vessel.
Our growth strategy focuses on expanding our fleet of LNG
carriers under long-term, fixed-rate charters. We view our
Suezmax tanker fleet primarily as a source of stable cash flow
as we expand our LNG operations. Our existing LNG fleet has
557,000 cubic meters of capacity, which will increase to
approximately 1.0 million cubic meters by the end of 2007
upon delivery of all LNG newbuilding carriers. The capacity of
our Suezmax tanker fleet is 785,500 deadweight tonnes.
We plan to leverage the expertise, relationships and reputation
of Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates to pursue
significant growth opportunities in the LNG sector. We believe
that conducting our operations through a publicly traded limited
partnership will provide us access to the public equity and debt
capital markets, a lower cost of capital for expansion and
acquisitions, and an enhanced ability to use our equity
securities as consideration in future acquisitions.
Our fleet was established by Naviera F. Tapias S.A.
(or Tapias), a private Spanish company founded in 1991 to
ship crude oil. Tapias began shipping LNG with the acquisition
of its first LNG carrier in 2002. Teekay Shipping Corporation
acquired Tapias in April 2004 and changed its name to Teekay
Shipping Spain S.L. (or Teekay Spain). As part of
the acquisition, Teekay Spain retained Tapiass senior
management, including its chief executive officer, and other
personnel, who will continue to manage the day-to-day operations
of Teekay Spain after the closing of this offering with input on
strategic decisions from our general partner. Teekay Spain will
also obtain strategic consulting, advisory, ship management,
technical and administrative services from affiliates of Teekay
Shipping Corporation.
On November 3, 2004, we were formed as a wholly owned
subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation in connection with
this offering. Upon the closing of this offering, we will own
Teekay Spain, among other
117
assets, and operate as a publicly traded limited partnership.
Teekay Shipping Corporation will then own a 78.0% limited
partner interest in us and own and control our general partner.
Business Opportunities
We believe the following industry dynamics create a favorable
environment in which to expand our LNG business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strong increase in demand for LNG vessels. Natural
gas represented approximately 23% of world energy consumption in
2001 and is the fastest growing primary energy source according
to the U.S. Department of Energy. Between 1993 and 2003,
the annual amount of LNG shipped internationally increased from
3.0 trillion cubic feet (or Tcf) to 5.9 Tcf, as a result
of improvements in liquefaction and regasification technologies,
decreases in LNG shipping costs and increases in demand from
consuming regions located far from natural gas reserves. Due to
the vast distances between many areas of natural gas production
and consumption and the related cost, regulatory and geological
challenges of pipeline construction, seaborne transportation of
LNG provides either the only or the most cost-effective means of
transporting natural gas to many consuming regions. As of
April 1, 2005, the world LNG carrier fleet consisted of 180
existing vessels and 108 vessels under order or construction. To
meet projected LNG shipping demand, LNG Shipping Solutions Ltd.
estimates that the worldwide LNG fleet must expand to
approximately 364 vessels by 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Globalization of LNG trade routes. We believe more
opportunities to transport LNG are developing outside
traditional trade routes. Historically, LNG trade primarily
centered around the major LNG exporters of Indonesia, Malaysia
and Algeria and the major LNG importers of Japan, South Korea
and Taiwan. However, we expect the Middle East and Africa to
continue to be increasingly important LNG exporting areas and
Russia, with its vast natural gas reserves, to become an LNG
exporter. We also expect Europe and North America to be among
the major LNG importers. We believe that the increase in the
number and scope of LNG trade routes will result in greater
accessibility to LNG and lead to increased LNG demand. |
|
|
|
Increasing ownership of world LNG carrier fleet by
independent owners. Until recently, major private and
state-owned energy companies owned most of the world LNG carrier
fleet. However, companies such as us that are independent of
major energy companies now own about 45% of the existing LNG
fleet, and independent owners have placed approximately 60% of
existing LNG newbuilding orders. We believe that the increasing
ownership of the world LNG fleet by independent owners is
attributable in part to the desire of some major energy
companies to limit their commitment to: |
|
|
|
|
|
the marine transportation business, which is non-core to their
operations; and |
|
|
|
the cost of financing of new LNG carriers in addition to the
high construction costs of LNG facilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Stringent customer standards favor high-quality operators.
Major energy companies are highly selective in their
choice of LNG transportation partners due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
their need for reliable, uninterrupted access to LNG
transportation; |
|
|
|
the heightened reliance on the LNG transportation partner once
selected, resulting from the lack of commercially viable
transportation alternatives; and |
|
|
|
public perception of LNG projects, which magnifies customer
sensitivity to hiring energy transportation providers with
strong reputations for maintaining high safety, environmental
and quality standards. |
|
|
|
These factors have contributed to increasingly stringent
pre-qualification operational and financial standards that LNG
vessel operators must meet prior to bidding on nearly all
significant LNG transportation contracts. We believe that these
rigorous and comprehensive standards will increase |
118
|
|
|
our ability relative to less qualified or experienced operators
to compete effectively for new LNG contracts. |
Business Strategies
Our primary business objective is to increase distributable cash
flow per unit by executing the following strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquire new LNG carriers built to project specifications
after long-term, fixed-rate time charters have been awarded for
an LNG project. Our LNG carriers (including the three
RasGas II vessels) were built or will be built to customer
specifications included in the related long-term, fixed-rate
time charters for the vessels. We intend to continue our
practice of acquiring LNG carriers as needed for approved
projects only after the long-term, fixed-rate time charters for
the projects have been awarded, rather than ordering vessels on
a speculative basis. We believe this approach is preferable to
speculative newbuilding because it: |
|
|
|
|
|
eliminates the risk of incremental or duplicative expenditures
to alter our LNG carriers to meet customer specifications; |
|
|
|
facilitates the financing of new LNG carriers based on their
anticipated future revenues; and |
|
|
|
ensures that new vessels will be employed upon acquisition,
which should generate more stable cash flow. |
|
|
|
|
|
Expand our LNG operations globally. We seek to
capitalize on opportunities emerging from the global expansion
of the LNG sector by selectively targeting: |
|
|
|
|
|
long-term, fixed-rate time charters wherever significant LNG
liquefaction and regasification facilities are being built or
expanded; |
|
|
|
joint ventures and partnerships with companies that may provide
increased access to opportunities in attractive LNG importing
and exporting geographic regions; and |
|
|
|
strategic vessel and business acquisitions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Provide superior customer service by maintaining high
reliability, safety, environmental and quality standards.
LNG project operators seek LNG transportation partners
that have a reputation for high reliability, safety,
environmental and quality standards. We will seek to leverage
our own and Teekay Shipping Corporations operational
expertise to create a sustainable competitive advantage with
consistent delivery of superior customer service by our: |
|
|
|
|
|
responsiveness, reliability, professionalism and integrity; |
|
|
|
adoption of responsible environmental practices and strict
adherence to environmental regulations; |
|
|
|
dedication to safe operations, commencing with our care in
selecting and training our sea and office personnel; and |
|
|
|
use of customer feedback and industry and internal performance
measures to drive continuous improvements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Manage our Suezmax tanker fleet to provide stable cash
flows. The remaining terms for our existing long-term
Suezmax tanker charters are 15 to 19 years, and the term of
our Suezmax newbuilding tanker will be 20 years from
delivery. We believe the fixed-rate time charters for our oil
tanker fleet will provide us stable cash flows during their
terms and a source of funding for expanding our LNG operations.
Depending on prevailing market conditions during and at the end
of each existing charter, we may seek to extend the charter,
enter into a new charter, operate the vessel on the spot market
or sell the vessel, in order to maximize returns on our Suezmax
fleet while managing residual risk. |
119
Competitive Strengths
We believe that we are well positioned to execute our business
strategies successfully because of the following competitive
strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
We have a strategic platform from which to expand our
presence in the rapidly growing LNG marine transportation
sector. We currently operate four LNG carriers and will
receive deliveries of three LNG newbuildings beginning in the
fourth quarter of 2006 through the first half of 2007. Our LNG
fleet, combined with our existing relationships with leading
energy and utility companies in Spain, a significant importer of
LNG, and our new relationship, through RasGas II, to the
important LNG exporting nation of Qatar, give us a significant
presence in the rapidly growing LNG marine transportation
sector. We believe this platform provides a strategic base from
which we will seek to expand existing relationships and attract
new customers. |
|
|
|
Our management and the personnel of Teekay Shipping
Corporations subsidiaries who will provide services to us
have extensive experience in fleet expansion. The Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general
partner, key employees of our subsidiary Teekay Spain and
personnel of other subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation
who will provide services to us pursuant to advisory and
administrative services agreements have successfully identified
and acquired over $3.7 billion in vessels since 1999,
expanding Teekays fleet from 50 to 145 vessels
through a combination of newbuildings, vessel and business
acquisitions and, in some cases, joint ventures. These
individuals have overseen all aspects of the construction of
over 50 newbuildings (including those currently under
order) during that period, including: |
|
|
|
|
|
identifying and pre-qualifying shipyards with reputations for
quality workmanship and timely vessel completion; |
|
|
|
advising customers about technical vessel specifications and
suggested improvements, and conducting related negotiations with
the shipyard; and |
|
|
|
supervising construction quality and shipyard progress toward
identified budgetary constraints and completion milestones. |
|
|
|
|
|
We believe our relationship with Teekay Shipping
Corporation and its prominence and customer relationships in the
shipping industry will significantly enhance our growth
opportunities. Established in 1973, Teekay Shipping
Corporation has achieved a global brand name in the shipping
industry, developed an extensive network of long-standing
relationships with major energy companies and earned a
reputation for reliability, safety and excellence. We believe
that our relationship with Teekay Shipping Corporation will
significantly enhance our growth opportunities and that we will
be able to leverage this relationship to our advantage in
competing for the transportation requirements of LNG projects
and in attracting and retaining long-term charter contracts
throughout the world. We also believe that Teekay Shipping
Corporations established relationships with leading
shipyards and the high number of newbuilding orders it places
with these shipyards will facilitate our interactions with these
shipyards during periods of shipyard production constraints,
which is anticipated over the next few years. |
|
|
|
We will supplement our operational experience through
continued access to Teekay Shipping Corporations expertise
in various functions critical to our vessel operations.
The key employees of our primary operating subsidiary, Teekay
Spain, bring to us significant technical, financial and
commercial capabilities relating to vessel operations and other
business matters. Through Teekay Shipping Corporations
extensive experience operating its large fleet and its
commitment to exceptional customer service, it has developed
specialized core competencies addressing various functions
critical to its and our operations, has adopted best practices
in the shipping industry and has developed an infrastructure to
efficiently coordinate and implement these skills and practices. |
120
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation have agreed to
provide ship management services to us, including: |
|
|
|
|
|
vessel maintenance; |
|
|
|
crewing; |
|
|
|
purchasing; |
|
|
|
shipyard supervision; |
|
|
|
insurance; and |
|
|
|
financial services. |
|
|
|
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Advisory and Administrative Services
Agreements Advisory, Technical and Administrative
Services Agreements Between Certain of Our Operating
Subsidiaries and Teekay Shipping Limited. We believe these
services will complement our existing operational experience and
provide strict quality and cost controls and effective safety
monitoring. |
|
|
|
|
|
We have financial flexibility to pursue acquisitions and
other expansion opportunities through additional debt borrowings
and the issuance of additional partnership units. In
connection with this offering, we entered into a revolving
credit facility which will provide us access to approximately
$100 million for working capital and acquisition purposes.
We believe that borrowings available under our revolving credit
facility, access to other bank financing facilities and the debt
capital markets, and our ability to issue additional partnership
units will provide us with financial flexibility to pursue
acquisition and expansion opportunities. |
Our Fleet
Our fleet consists of four LNG carriers and five Suezmax-class
crude oil tankers. In addition, we have contracted to build an
additional Suezmax tanker, the Toledo Spirit, which is
scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2005. Upon or
prior to delivery of the Suezmax tanker, Teekay Shipping
Corporation has agreed to purchase one of our Suezmax tankers,
the Granada Spirit, which will be chartered to Teekay
Shipping Corporation under a short-term, fixed-rate charter
until that time. We have also agreed to acquire from Teekay
Shipping Corporation all of its interest in the three
RasGas II LNG newbuildings once the first of the three
vessels is delivered, which interest will be no less than 70%.
The scheduled delivery dates for the three RasGas II LNG
carriers are between the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first
half of 2007. Please read Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Agreement to Purchase
RasGas II Interest and Granada
Spirit Charter and Purchase Agreement.
All of our existing vessels operate (other than the Granada
Spirit), and the newbuildings we have ordered or will
purchase from Teekay Shipping Corporation will operate, under
long-term time charters with major energy and utility companies.
All of these vessels are or will be of Spanish or Bahamian
registry and double-hulled, other than the Granada
Spirit, which is single-hulled.
121
The following table provides additional information about our
LNG vessels as of April 1, 2005. The delivery dates for the
newbuildings are based on current shipyard schedules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
Vessel |
|
Capacity | |
|
Delivery | |
|
Our Ownership |
|
Charterer | |
|
Charter Term* | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(cubic meters) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating LNG carriers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispania Spirit
|
|
|
140,500 |
|
|
|
Sept. 2002 |
|
|
100% |
|
|
Repsol YPF |
|
|
|
17 years(1) |
|
Catalunya Spirit
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
Aug. 2003 |
|
|
Capital lease(2) |
|
|
Gas Natural SDG |
|
|
|
18 years(1) |
|
Galicia Spirit
|
|
|
140,500 |
|
|
|
July 2004 |
|
|
100% |
|
|
Uniòn Fenosa Gas |
|
|
|
24 years(3) |
|
Madrid Spirit
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
Dec. 2004 |
|
|
Capital lease(2) |
|
|
Repsol YPF |
|
|
|
20 years(1) |
|
Newbuildings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hull No. 2238
|
|
|
151,700 |
|
|
|
Oct. 2006 |
|
|
Teekay-owned(4) |
|
|
RasGas II |
|
|
|
20 years(5) |
|
Hull No. 2239
|
|
|
151,700 |
|
|
|
Jan. 2007 |
|
|
Teekay-owned(4) |
|
|
RasGas II |
|
|
|
20 years(5) |
|
Hull No. 2240
|
|
|
151,700 |
|
|
|
Apr. 2007 |
|
|
Teekay-owned(4) |
|
|
RasGas II |
|
|
|
20 years(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capacity:
|
|
|
1,012,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Each of our time charters are subject to certain termination and
purchase obligations. Please read LNG Time
Charters Purchase Options, Termination Rights and
Bareboat Conversion Options. |
|
(1) |
The charterer has two options to extend the term for an
additional five years each. |
|
(2) |
We lease the vessel under a Spanish tax lease arrangement and
will purchase the vessel when the lease terminates in 2006 for
the Catalunya Spirit and 2011 for the Madrid
Spirit. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources Ship Financing
Arrangements. |
|
(3) |
The charterer has one option to extend the term for an
additional five years. |
|
(4) |
These vessels are currently owned by subsidiaries of Teekay
Shipping Corporation. Upon the delivery of the first vessel, we
will purchase Teekay Shipping Corporations entire interest
in the vessels, which will be no less than 70% in each vessel.
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreement to Purchase RasGas II
Interest. |
|
(5) |
The charterer has three options to extend the term for an
additional five years each. |
As of April 1, 2005, our LNG carriers had an average age of
approximately two years, compared to the world LNG carrier
fleet average age of approximately 13.5 years. LNG carriers
are generally expected to have a lifespan of approximately
40 years. All of our LNG vessels have a membrane-type
containment system. Please see Industry
Liquefied Natural Gas LNG Shipping
Industry LNG Carriers for a description
of this system.
Our customers are free to use our LNG carriers worldwide or to
sublet the vessels to third parties. For the first half of 2004,
our LNG carriers primarily transported LNG from Trinidad and
Tobago to the United States.
Each LNG carrier that is owned by us or Teekay Shipping
Corporation is encumbered by a mortgage relating to the
vessels financing. Each of the other LNG carriers is
subject to a capital lease and a mortgage associated with our
financing of the restricted cash deposits associated with the
vessel.
LNG Newbuildings. We have contracted to acquire
from Teekay Shipping Corporation all of its interest in the
three RasGas II LNG newbuildings. Teekay Shipping
Corporation has agreed to finance the construction of the
RasGas II vessels, which allows us to defer our need to
finance them. Please read Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Agreement to Purchase
RasGas II Interest.
122
The following table provides additional information about our
Suezmax oil tankers as of April 1, 2005. The delivery dates
for the newbuilding vessels are based on current shipyard
schedules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
Tanker |
|
Capacity | |
|
Delivery | |
|
Our Ownership |
|
Charterer |
|
Charter Term |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dwt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Suezmax tankers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granada Spirit
|
|
|
147,500 |
|
|
|
Jan. 1990 |
|
|
100%(1) |
|
Teekay |
|
(1) |
Tenerife Spirit
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
July 2000 |
|
|
Capital lease(2) |
|
CEPSA |
|
15 years(3) |
Algeciras Spirit
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
Oct. 2000 |
|
|
Capital lease(2) |
|
CEPSA |
|
15 years(3) |
Huelva Spirit
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
Mar. 2001 |
|
|
Capital lease(2) |
|
CEPSA |
|
16 years(3) |
Teide Spirit
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
Oct. 2004 |
|
|
Capital lease(2) |
|
CEPSA |
|
19 years(3) |
|
Newbuilding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toledo Spirit
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
July 2005 |
|
|
Capital lease(4) |
|
CEPSA |
|
20 years(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capacity:
|
|
|
945,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We sold the Granada Spirit to Teekay Shipping Corporation
in December 2004. Teekay Shipping Corporation will contribute
the Granada Spirit back to us at the closing of this
offering, and we will enter into a short-term fixed rate charter
with Teekay Shipping Corporation. Upon termination of the
charter, Teekay Shipping Corporation will purchase the vessel.
The charter will terminate upon the earliest of delivery to us
of the Toledo Spirit, December 31, 2005 or the
purchase of the Granada Spirit by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. Please read Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Granada Spirit Charter and
Purchase Agreement. |
|
(2) |
We are the lessee under a capital lease arrangement and are
required to purchase the vessel seven years after the
commencement of the capital lease, which we expect to accomplish
by assuming the existing vessel financing. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Ship Financing Arrangements. |
|
(3) |
CEPSA has the right to terminate the time charter 13 years
after the original delivery date, in which case we are generally
expected to sell the vessel, subject to our right of first
refusal to purchase the vessel. Please read
Crude Oil Time Charters
CEPSAs Right to Terminate. |
|
(4) |
We will be the lessee under a capital lease arrangement similar
to those in place for our existing tankers. |
As of April 1, 2005, our Suezmax tankers, other than the
Granada Spirit, had an average age of approximately
four years, compared to the average age of 9.2 years
for the world Suezmax conventional tanker fleet. New Suezmax
tankers generally are expected to have a lifespan of
approximately 25 to 30 years, based on estimated hull
fatigue life. However, United States and international
regulations require the earlier phase-out of single-hulled
vessels, regardless of their expected lifespan. All of our
Suezmax tankers under long-term charter are double-hulled. As
mentioned above, we intend to sell the Granada Spirit,
our only single-hulled vessel, to Teekay Shipping Corporation
prior to its required phase-out under applicable regulations.
The Granada Spirit is not subject to any encumbrance.
Each of our other Suezmax tankers is subject to a capital lease
and a mortgage associated with the lessors financing of
the vessel.
Our Customers
We provide or will provide LNG marine transportation services
under long-term time charters to the following major energy
companies or their affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
Repsol YPF, S.A., Spains largest oil company
and largest seller of liquefied petroleum gas. As of
December 31, 2003, Repsol reported having proven reserves
of 5.4 billion barrels of crude oil equivalent, mostly in
Latin America, the Middle East and North Africa. Repsol owns
Argentinas |
123
|
|
|
|
|
largest oil company and, as of July 1, 2004, had operations
in 29 countries and owned five refineries in Spain. |
|
|
|
Gas Natural SDG, S.A., Spains largest
natural gas distributor. Gas Natural operates a group of
companies that supply, store, transport and distribute natural
gas in Spain and Latin America. As of September 30, 2004, Gas
Natural reported having 4.7 million Spanish customers and
4.4 million Latin American customers. As of October 2004,
Repsol owned approximately 30% of Gas Natural. |
|
|
|
|
Uniòn Fenosa Gas, S.A., a jointly held
subsidiary of Uniòn Fenosa, S.A., a diversified Spanish
energy and telecommunication company, and ENI S.p.a., an Italian
oil and gas company. Uniòn Fenosas primary business
is the generation, distribution and commercialization of
electricity and natural gas in Spain. |
|
|
|
|
RasGas II, a joint venture between Qatar Petroleum
and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil
Corporation, established for the purpose of expanding LNG
production in Qatar. RasGas II will become one of our
customers following our acquisition from Teekay Shipping
Corporation of all of its interest in the three RasGas II
LNG newbuildings and related time charters. We expect to take
delivery of the three vessels between the fourth quarter of 2006
and the first half of 2007. |
We provide crude oil marine transportation services under
long-term time charters to Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A.
(or CEPSA), a Spanish energy conglomerate. CEPSA is
Spains second largest oil company and a diversified
provider of natural gas and petrochemical products. Teekay Spain
or its predecessors have provided services to CEPSA since 1988.
We will also time charter one Suezmax tanker, the Granada
Spirit, to Teekay Shipping Corporation. The charter will
expire on the earliest of the delivery to us of the Toledo
Spirit, December 31, 2005 or the early purchase of the
Granada Spirit by Teekay Shipping Corporation. Teekay
Shipping Corporation has agreed to purchase the Granada
Spirit upon termination of the charter. The Toledo Spirit
is scheduled for delivery in July 2005.
CEPSA, Repsol and Gas Natural accounted for 47%, 26% and 11%,
respectively, of our 2003 revenues and 36%, 18% and 21%,
respectively, of our 2004 revenues. No other customer accounted
for 10% or more of our revenues during either of these periods.
The loss of any significant customer or a substantial decline in
the amount of services requested by a significant customer could
harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Time Charters General Provisions
We provide the services of our vessels to our customers under
time charters, and we operate certain of our vessels pursuant to
capital leases, which include our contractual right to full
operation of the vessel pursuant to bareboat charters. A time
charter is a contract for the use of a vessel for a fixed period
of time at a specified daily rate. Under a time charter, the
vessel owner provides crewing and other services related to the
vessels operation, the cost of which is included in the
daily rate; the customer is responsible for substantially all of
the vessel voyage costs. The following discussion describes the
material terms common to all of our long-term time charters, and
then describes additional material terms common to the contracts
for our LNG vessels and our oil tankers. The time charters for
each type of vessel contain generally similar terms.
The initial term for a time charter commences upon the
vessels delivery. All of our LNG time charters include
options, exercisable by the customer, to extend the
charters term. Under these charters, the customer may also
extend the term for periods in which the vessel is off-hire, as
described below. Our crude oil time charters with CEPSA do not
include term extensions. All of our customers have rights to
124
terminate their charters prior to expiration of the original
term in specified circumstances (or any extension term),
including purchase options and sale rights, as described in more
detail below.
Hire rate refers to the basic payment from the
customer for the use of the vessel. Hire is payable monthly, in
advance, in U.S. Dollars or Euros, as specified in the charter.
The hire rate includes two general components a
capital cost component and an operating expense component. The
capital component relates to the financing obligations for the
vessels purchase and typically is structured to meet the
repayment schedule for the financing. The operating component is
intended to compensate us for vessel operating expenses and
provide us a profit. The amount of the operating component is
established between the parties at the beginning of the charter
and it typically increases annually based on changes in a
specified cost-of-living index.
Hire payments may be reduced, or under some charters we must pay
liquidated damages, if the vessel does not perform to certain of
its specifications, such as if the average vessel speed falls
below a guaranteed speed or the amount of fuel consumed to power
the vessel under normal circumstances exceeds a guaranteed
amount. Historically, we have had four instances of hire rate
reductions, none of which had a material impact on our operating
results.
We are responsible for vessel operating expenses, which include
crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils
and communication expenses. We are also directly responsible for
providing all of these items and services. The customer
generally pays the voyage expenses, which include all expenses
relating to particular voyages, including any bunker fuel
expenses, port fees, cargo loading and unloading expenses, canal
tolls, agency fees and commissions.
When the vessel is off-hire or not
available for service the customer generally is not
required to pay the hire rate, and we are responsible for all
costs. Prolonged off-hire may lead to vessel substitution or
termination of the time charter. A vessel generally will be
deemed off-hire if there is a loss of time due to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
operational deficiencies; drydocking for repairs, maintenance or
inspection; equipment breakdowns; or delays due to accidents,
crewing strikes, certain vessel detentions or similar problems;
or |
|
|
|
our failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with its
specifications and contractual standards or to provide the
required crew. |
|
|
|
Ship Management and Maintenance |
Under all of our time charters, we are responsible for the
technical management of the vessel and for maintaining the
vessel, periodic drydocking, cleaning and painting and
performing work required by regulations. Subsidiaries of Teekay
Shipping Corporation will provide many of these services to us
pursuant to services agreements. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Advisory and Administrative Services Agreements
Advisory, Technical and Administrative Services Agreements
Between Certain of Our Operating Subsidiaries and Teekay
Shipping Limited.
Each time charter terminates automatically upon loss of the
vessel. In addition, we are generally entitled to suspend
performance (but with the continuing accrual to our benefit of
hire payments and default interest) and, under most time
charters, terminate the charter if the customer defaults in its
payment obligations. Under most of our time charters, either
party may also terminate the charter in the
125
event of war in specified countries or in locations that would
significantly disrupt the free trade of the vessel.
LNG Time Charters
In addition to standard reductions in hire rates for failing to
achieve guaranteed speed or fuel consumption, our LNG customers
are entitled to reduce our hire rate if boil-off gas exceeds
guaranteed amounts or the LNG vessels cargo capacity is
reduced for any reason. One customer is entitled to liquidated
damages for performance deficiencies at the time of delivery and
hire reductions for deficiencies thereafter. Our charters with
three customers prevent the customer from reducing hire below
the capital component, even if the carrier is deemed to be
off-hire under the charter. In recognition of the depreciated
value of an older vessel, the LNG time charters provide for
reductions in the fixed component of the hire rate during any
term extensions.
Under our LNG time charters, if the vessel remains off-hire for
extended periods, the customer may, and in some cases may be
required by the ship financing lenders to, exercise some or all
of the following remedies, which vary by time charter:
|
|
|
|
|
request that we provide a substitute vessel, which the customer
must accept on the hire terms of the original time charter; |
|
|
|
require us to pay the difference between the hire rate in the
time charter and the cost of chartering a substitute vessel, up
to 30% of the original hire rate; |
|
|
|
take over management of the vessel and set off management
expenses from the hire payments under the time charter (but not
against the fixed hire rate component); or |
|
|
|
terminate the time charter contract. |
|
|
|
Ship Delivery and Modifications |
If delivery of the vessel to the customer is delayed, we (or in
the case of some charters, Teekay Shipping Corporation) must pay
liquidated damages in amounts equal to or, under some charters,
almost double, the hire rate during the delay. For prolonged
delays, the customer may terminate the charter. We typically
have some recourse against the shipbuilder for payments we are
required to make as a result of these delays. Historically we
have experienced few delays in the delivery of newbuildings from
shipyards, and we maintain personnel at the shipyards who are
dedicated to overseeing the timely and quality construction of
our newbuildings. After delivery, the LNG customers may request
vessel modifications, but they are responsible for the cost of
these modifications and the hire during the related drydock time.
|
|
|
Purchase Options, Termination Rights and Bareboat
Conversion Options |
Our LNG customers may terminate our time charters under three
different types of provisions: purchase options, termination
rights, and the right to convert the time charter to a bareboat
charter, in which case we would no longer be responsible for the
ships operation but would receive only an amount slightly
greater than the fixed component of the hire rate. Customers
also may terminate time charters for off-hire reasons or our
failure to deliver to the vessel, as discussed above. The
charters provide for the more specific termination rights in one
of three general forms:
Under the first form of time charter (generally covering three
charters),
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may purchase the vessel |
|
|
|
(a) at the end of the initial or any extended charter
period, at a price designated in the charter; or |
126
|
|
|
(b) if the customers LNG sales agreement supplying
the LNG designated for our services is terminated, at a price
that covers all of our outstanding indebtedness on the vessel
and any prepayment fees (or, if applicable, an amount that
approximates the amount of debt that would have been outstanding
had we not prepaid the indebtedness in connection with this
offering) plus an additional amount designated in the
charter; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may terminate the charter |
|
|
|
|
(a) if the customers LNG sales agreement supplying
the LNG designated for our services is terminated, in which case
the customer would be obligated to pay all outstanding
indebtedness on the vessel and any prepayment fees (or, if
applicable, an amount that approximates the amount of debt that
would have been outstanding had we not prepaid the indebtedness
in connection with this offering); or |
|
|
|
(b) if the free trade of the vessel is disrupted due to
war, without any payment or penalty. |
Under the second form of time charter (covering one charter),
|
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may purchase the vessel at any time at a price that
equals the amount of indebtedness that would had been
outstanding had we not prepaid the indebtedness on the vessel in
connection with this offering, plus an additional amount
designated in the charter; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may terminate the time charter if the supply of LNG
is generally unavailable, in which case the customer would be
obligated to pay an amount equal to the indebtedness that would
have been outstanding on the vessel had we not prepaid the
indebtedness in connection with this offering. |
|
Under the third form of time charter (covering three charters),
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may purchase the vessel |
|
|
|
(a) when it is otherwise entitled to terminate the charter
or under certain circumstances if we are in default under the
charter, at a price designated in the charter that is designed
to cover all of our remaining financing costs plus certain lost
profits; or |
|
|
(b) at any time at a price designated in the charter that
is designed to cover all of our remaining financing costs,
certain lost profits and an additional amount; |
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may terminate the charter |
|
|
|
(a) at any time, in which case the customer would be
obligated to pay a substantial cancellation fee; or |
|
|
(b) in the event of a prolonged continuation of certain
specified force majeure events that are beyond the
parties control and that would prevent the customers
performance under the charter (including damage to or
destruction of relevant LNG production facilities or LNG
customer regasification facilities), upon our bankruptcy or if
we are in breach of a specified provision of the charter, in
each case without any payment or penalty; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the customer may convert the time charter to a bareboat charter |
|
|
|
(a) if we breach our obligations to deliver a vessel built
to the customers specifications or to remedy warranty
deficiencies and we fail to cure this breach; |
|
|
(b) due to our negligence, the vessel is involved in a
significant marine incident or is off-hire for a prolonged
period; or |
|
|
|
(c) the customer could otherwise then terminate the time
charter. |
|
127
Crude Oil Time Charters
CEPSAs Right to Terminate. In
connection with CEPSAs desire to be able to renew the
tankers it charters and keep the tankers at a relatively young
age, all of our crude oil time charters give CEPSA the right, at
any time after 13 years from delivery of the tanker
(between 2013 and 2018), to cancel the time charter and require
the sale of the tanker. Even in that event, however, we have the
right to retain the vessel.
CEPSA may also terminate our crude oil time charters in the
event of war, as described above.
Classification, Inspection and Maintenance
The seafaring staff operating our vessels regularly inspect them
and perform much of the necessary routine maintenance.
Shore-based operational and technical specialists also inspect
our vessels at least twice a year for conformity with
established criteria. Upon completion of each inspection,
recommendations are made for improving the overall condition of
the vessel and its maintenance, safety and crew welfare. All
recommendations are monitored until they are completed. Our
objectives are to:
|
|
|
|
|
maintain the structural integrity of the vessel; |
|
|
|
ensure reliability; |
|
|
|
optimize performance in terms of speed and fuel consumption; and |
|
|
|
ensure the vessels appearance will support our brand and
meet customer expectations. |
To achieve our vessel structural integrity objective, we use a
comprehensive Structural Integrity Management System
developed by Teekay Shipping Corporation. This system is
designed to monitor the condition of our vessels closely and to
ensure that structural strength and integrity are maintained
throughout a vessels life.
All of our vessels have been certified as being
in-class by their respective classification
societies: Bureau Veritas, Det Norske Veritas or Lloyds
Register of Shipping. Every vessels hull and machinery is
classed by a classification society. The
classification society certifies that the vessel has been built
and is maintained in accordance with the rules of that
classification society and complies with applicable rules and
regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and the
international conventions of which that country is a signatory,
although for some of our vessels we obtain this latter
certification directly from the relevant flag state authorities.
Each vessel is inspected by a classification society surveyor
annually, with either the second or third annual inspection
being a more detailed survey (an Intermediate Survey) and
the fourth or fifth annual inspection being the most
comprehensive survey (a Special Survey). The inspection
cycle resumes after each Special Survey. Vessels also may be
required to be drydocked at each Intermediate and Special Survey
for inspection of the underwater parts of the vessel and
resulting repairs. Intermediate Surveys of steam-propelled LNG
vessels may be done while the vessel is in service, but in all
instances the inspection requires shutting down the
vessels main boiler, which slows travel if in service.
In-water surveys generally take vessels out of service for one
day, but out-of-service surveys of steam-propelled LNG vessels
can take up to seven days. All of our LNG carriers, including
our newbuildings, are steam-propelled. Many of our vessels have
qualified with their respective classification societies for
drydocking every four or five years in connection with the
Special Survey and are no longer subject to the Intermediate
Survey drydocking process. To qualify, we were required to
enhance the resiliency of the underwater coatings of each vessel
and mark the hull to accommodate underwater inspections by
divers. All but one of our LNG vessels meet these requirements,
and we expect the non-qualifying vessel will be qualified at its
next Special Survey.
In addition to the classification inspections, many of our
customers regularly inspect our vessels as a precondition to
chartering, and regular inspections are standard practice under
long-term charters as well.
128
Port and flag state control authorities, such as the U.S. Coast
Guard and Spains flag administration (or classification
societies acting on behalf of the flag state control
authorities), also inspect some of our vessels. We believe that
our relatively new, well-maintained and high-quality vessels
should provide us with a competitive advantage in the current
environment of increasing regulation and customer emphasis on
quality of service.
Safety, Management of Ship Operations and Administration
Safety is our top operational priority. Our vessels are operated
in a manner intended to protect the safety and health of our
employees, the general public and the environment. We actively
manage the risks inherent in our business and are committed to
eliminating incidents that threaten safety, such as groundings,
fires, collisions and petroleum and LNG spills. We are also
committed to reducing emissions and waste generation.
We have established key performance indicators to facilitate
regular monitoring of our operational performance. We set
targets on an annual basis to drive continuous improvement, and
we review performance indicators monthly to determine if
remedial action is necessary to reach our targets.
Teekay Spains shore staff performs a full range of
technical, commercial and business development services for us.
This staff also provides administrative support to our
operations in finance, accounting and human resources.
Teekay Shipping Corporation, through its subsidiaries, assists
us in managing our ship operations. Teekay Shipping Corporation
has obtained through Det Norske Veritas, the Norwegian
classification society, approval of its safety management system
as in compliance with the International Safety Management Code
(or ISM Code), and this system has been implemented for
our Bahamian-flagged vessels. Spains flag administration
has approved this safety management system for our
Spanish-flagged vessels. As part of Teekay Shipping
Corporations ISM Code compliance, all of our vessels
safety management certificates are being maintained through
ongoing internal audits performed by Teekay Shipping
Corporations certified internal auditors and intermediate
audits performed by Det Norske Veritas or Spains flag
administration.
In addition to our operational experience, Teekay Shipping
Corporation provides, through its subsidiaries, expertise in
various functions critical to our operations. This affords a
safe, efficient and cost-effective operation and, pursuant to
administrative services agreements with certain subsidiaries of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, access to human resources,
financial and other administrative functions.
Critical ship management functions that Teekay Shipping
Corporation has agreed to provide to us through its Teekay
Marine Services division located in various offices around the
world include:
|
|
|
|
|
vessel maintenance; |
|
|
|
crewing; |
|
|
|
purchasing; |
|
|
|
shipyard supervision; |
|
|
|
insurance; and |
|
|
|
financial services. |
These functions are supported by onboard and onshore systems for
maintenance, inventory, purchasing and budget management.
In addition, Teekay Shipping Corporations day-to-day focus
on cost control will be applied to our operations. In 2003,
Teekay Shipping Corporation and two other shipping companies
established a purchasing alliance, Teekay Bergesen Worldwide,
which leverages the purchasing power of the combined fleets,
mainly in such commodity areas as lube oils, paints and other
chemicals. Through our arrangements with Teekay Shipping
Corporation, we will benefit from this purchasing alliance.
129
The generally uniform design of some of our existing and
newbuilding vessels and the adoption of common equipment
standards should also result in operational efficiencies,
including with respect to crew training and vessel management,
equipment operation and repair, and spare parts ordering.
Crewing and Staff
As of March 31, 2005, we employed approximately
382 seagoing staff who serve on our vessels and
approximately 33 shore staff. Teekay Shipping Corporation
and its subsidiaries may employ additional seagoing staff to
assist us as we grow. Certain subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping
Corporation will provide advisory, operational and
administrative support to us pursuant to service agreements.
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Advisory and Administrative Services
Agreements.
We regard attracting and retaining motivated seagoing personnel
as a top priority. Like Teekay Shipping Corporation, we offer
our seafarers highly competitive employment packages and
comprehensive benefits and opportunities for personal and career
development, which relates to a philosophy of promoting
internally.
Teekay Shipping Corporation has entered into a Collective
Bargaining Agreement with the Philippine Seafarers Union,
an affiliate of the International Transport Workers
Federation (or ITF), and a Special Agreement with ITF
London, which covers substantially all of the officers and
seamen that operate our Bahamian-flagged vessels. Our officers
and seamen for our Spanish-flagged vessels are covered by a
collective bargaining agreement with Spains Union General
de Trabajadores and Comisiones Obreras. We believe our
relationships with these labor unions are good.
Our commitment to training is fundamental to the development of
the highest caliber of seafarers for our marine operations.
Teekay Shipping Corporation has agreed to allow our personnel to
participate in its training programs. Teekay Shipping
Corporations cadet training approach is designed to
balance academic learning with hands-on training at sea. Teekay
Shipping Corporation has relationships with training
institutions in Australia, Canada, Croatia, India, Latvia,
Norway, Philippines, South Africa and the United Kingdom. After
receiving formal instruction at one of these institutions, our
cadets training continues on board one of our vessels.
Teekay Shipping Corporation also has a career development plan
that we will follow, which was devised to ensure a continuous
flow of qualified officers who are trained on its vessels and
familiarized with its operational standards, systems and
policies. We believe that high-quality crewing and training
policies will play an increasingly important role in
distinguishing larger independent shipping companies that have
in-house or affiliate capabilities from smaller companies that
must rely on outside ship managers and crewing agents on the
basis of customer service and safety.
Risk of Loss, Insurance and Risk Management
The operation of any ocean-going vessel carries an inherent risk
of catastrophic marine disasters, death or injury of persons and
property losses caused by adverse weather conditions, mechanical
failures, human error, war, terrorism, piracy and other
circumstances or events. In addition, the transportation of LNG
and crude oil is subject to the risk of spills and to business
interruptions due to political circumstances in foreign
countries, hostilities, labor strikes and boycotts. The
occurrence of any of these events may result in loss of revenues
or increased costs.
We carry hull and machinery and protection and
indemnity insurance coverage to protect against most of
the accident-related risks involved in the conduct of our
business. Hull and machinery insurance covers loss of or damage
to a vessel due to marine perils such as collisions, grounding
and weather. Protection and indemnity insurance indemnifies us
against other liabilities incurred while operating vessels,
including injury to our crew, third parties, cargo loss and
pollution. The current available amount of our coverage for
pollution is $1 billion per vessel per incident. We also
carry insurance policies covering war risks (including piracy
and terrorism) and, for our LNG carriers, loss of revenues
resulting from vessel off-hire time due to a marine casualty or
an officer or crew strike. However, we may not continue to carry
this loss of hire insurance based on its cost
compared to our off-hire experience. We believe that our current
insurance coverage is adequate to protect against most of the
accident-related risks involved in the conduct
130
of our business and that we maintain appropriate levels of
environmental damage and pollution coverage. However, we cannot
assure that all covered risks are adequately insured against,
that any particular claim will be paid or that we will be able
to procure adequate insurance coverage at commercially
reasonable rates in the future. More stringent environmental
regulations at times in the past have resulted in increased
costs for, and may result in the lack of availability of,
insurance against the risks of environmental damage or
pollution. Please read Risk Factors Risks
Inherent in Our Business Our insurance may be
insufficient to cover losses that may occur to our property or
result from our operations.
We will use in our operations Teekay Shipping Corporations
thorough risk management program that includes, among other
things, computer-aided risk analysis tools, maintenance and
assessment programs, a seafarers competence training program,
seafarers workshops and membership in emergency response
organizations. We expect to benefit from Teekay Shipping
Corporations commitment to safety and environmental
protection as certain of its subsidiaries assist us in managing
our vessel operations.
Teekay Shipping Corporation has achieved certification under the
standards reflected in International Standards
Organizations (or ISO) 9001 for quality assurance,
ISO 14001 for environment management systems, OHSAS 18001 for
Occupational Health and Safety, and the IMOs International
Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and Pollution
Prevention on a fully integrated basis.
Regulation
Our business and the operation of our vessels are significantly
affected by international conventions and national, state and
local laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which our
vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of their
registration. Because these conventions, laws and regulations
change frequently, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of
compliance or their impact on the resale price or useful life of
our vessels. Additional conventions, laws and regulations may be
adopted that could limit our ability to do business or increase
the cost of our doing business and that may materially adversely
affect our operations. We are required by various governmental
and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain permits, licenses and
certificates with respect to our operations. Subject to the
discussion below and to the fact that the kinds of permits,
licenses and certificates required for the operations of the
vessels we own will depend on a number of factors, we believe
that we will be able to continue to obtain all permits, licenses
and certificates material to the conduct of our operations.
We believe that the heightened environmental and quality
concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers
will generally lead to greater inspection and safety
requirements on all vessels in the LNG carrier and oil tanker
markets and will accelerate the scrapping of older vessels
throughout these industries.
|
|
|
Regulation International Maritime Organization
(or IMO) |
IMO regulations include the International Convention for Safety
of Life at Sea (or SOLAS), including amendments to SOLAS
implementing the International Security Code for Ports and Ships
(or ISPS), the ISM Code, the International Convention on
Prevention of Pollution from Ships (the MARPOL Convention), the
International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution
Damage of 1969, the International Convention on Load Lines of
1966, and, specifically with respect to LNG carriers, the
International Code for Construction and Equipment of Ships
Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (or the IGC Code). SOLAS
provides rules for the construction of and equipment required
for commercial vessels and includes regulations for safe
operation. Flag states which have ratified the convention and
the treaty generally employ the classification societies, which
have incorporated SOLAS requirements into their class rules, to
undertake surveys to confirm compliance.
SOLAS and other IMO regulations concerning safety, including
those relating to treaties on training of shipboard personnel,
lifesaving appliances, radio equipment and the global maritime
distress and safety system, are applicable to our operations.
Non-compliance with IMO regulations, including SOLAS, the
131
ISM Code, ISPS and the IGC Code, may subject us to increased
liability or penalties, may lead to decreases in available
insurance coverage for affected vessels and may result in the
denial of access to or detention in some ports. For example, the
Coast Guard and European Union authorities have indicated that
vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code will be prohibited
from trading in U.S. and European Union ports.
The ISM Code requires vessel operators to obtain a safety
management certification for each vessel they manage, evidencing
the shipowners compliance with requirements of the ISM
Code relating to the development and maintenance of an extensive
Safety Management System. Such a system includes,
among other things, the adoption of a safety and environmental
protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for
safe operation and describing procedures for dealing with
emergencies. Each of the existing vessels in our fleet currently
is ISM Code-certified, and we expect to obtain safety management
certificates for each newbuilding vessel upon delivery.
ISPS was adopted in December 2002 in the wake of heightened
concern over worldwide terrorism and became effective on
July 1, 2004. The objective of ISPS is to enhance maritime
security by detecting security threats to ships and ports and by
requiring the development of security plans and other measures
designed to prevent such threats. The United States implemented
ISPS with the adoption of the Maritime Transportation Security
Act of 2002 (or MTSA), which requires vessels entering
U.S. waters to obtain certification of plans to respond to
emergency incidents there, including identification of persons
authorized to implement the plans. Each of the existing vessels
in our fleet currently complies with the requirements of ISPS
and MTSA, and we expect all newbuildings to comply upon delivery.
LNG carriers are also subject to regulation under the IGC Code.
Each LNG carrier must obtain a certificate of compliance
evidencing that it meets the requirements of the IGC Code,
including requirements relating to its design and construction.
Each of our LNG carriers currently is in substantial compliance
with the IGC Code, and each of our newbuilding shipbuilding
contracts requires compliance prior to delivery.
Under IMO regulations an oil tanker must be of double-hull
construction, be of a mid-deck design with double-side
construction or be of another approved design ensuring the same
level of protection against oil pollution in the event that such
tanker:
|
|
|
|
|
is the subject of a contract for a major conversion or original
construction on or after July 6, 1993; |
|
|
|
commences a major conversion or has its keel laid on or after
January 6, 1994; or |
|
|
|
completes a major conversion or is a newbuilding delivered on or
after July 6, 1996. |
In December 2003, the IMO revised its regulations relating to
the prevention of pollution from oil tankers. These regulations,
which became effective April 5, 2005, accelerate the
mandatory phase-out of single-hull tankers and impose a more
rigorous inspection regime for older tankers. All but one of our
oil tankers are double-hulled and were delivered after
July 6, 1996, so those tankers will not be affected
directly by these IMO regulations. Teekay Shipping Corporation
has agreed to purchase our only single-hulled vessel, the
Granada Spirit, no later than December 31, 2005.
This will precede any retrofitting or retirement required by the
IMO regulations.
|
|
|
Environmental Regulations The United States
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (or OPA 90) |
OPA 90 established an extensive regulatory and liability
regime for the protection and cleanup of the environment from
oil spills, including discharges of oil cargoes, fuel (or
bunkers) or lubricants. OPA 90 affects all owners
and operators whose vessels trade to the United States or its
territories or possessions or whose vessels operate in United
States waters, which include the U.S. territorial sea and
200-mile exclusive economic zone around the United States.
Under OPA 90, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers
are responsible parties and are jointly, severally
and strictly liable (unless the spill results solely from the
act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war
and the responsible party reports the incident and reasonably
cooperates
132
with the appropriate authorities.) for all containment and
cleanup costs and other damages arising from discharges or
threatened discharges of oil from their vessels. These other
damages are defined broadly to include:
|
|
|
|
|
natural resources damages and the related assessment costs; |
|
|
|
real and personal property damages; |
|
|
|
net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, fees and other lost
revenues; |
|
|
|
lost profits or impairment of earning capacity due to property
or natural resources damage; |
|
|
|
net cost of public services necessitated by a spill response,
such as protection from fire, safety or health hazards; and |
|
|
|
loss of subsistence use of natural resources. |
OPA 90 limits the liability of responsible parties to the
greater of $1,200 per gross ton or $10 million per
tanker that is over 3,000 gross tons per incident, subject
to possible adjustment for inflation. These limits of liability
would not apply if the incident were proximately caused by
violation of applicable U.S. federal safety, construction
or operating regulations, including IMO conventions to which the
United States is a signatory, or by the responsible partys
gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the responsible
party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate
and assist in connection with the oil removal activities. We
currently plan to continue to maintain for each of our
vessels pollution liability coverage in the amount of
$1 billion per incident. A catastrophic spill could exceed
the coverage available, which could harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Under OPA 90, with limited exceptions, all newly built or
converted tankers delivered after January 1, 1994 and
operating in United States waters must be built with
double-hulls. All but one of our existing tankers are, and all
of our newbuildings will be, double-hulled. Our only
single-hulled tanker will be sold to Teekay Shipping Corporation
prior to any phase-out that would otherwise be mandated by
OPA 90.
In December 1994, the United States Coast Guard (or Coast
Guard) implemented regulations requiring evidence of
financial responsibility in the amount of $1,500 per gross
ton for tankers, coupling the OPA limitation on liability of
$1,200 per gross ton with the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (or CERCLA)
liability limit of $300 per gross ton. Under the regulations,
such evidence of financial responsibility may be demonstrated by
insurance, surety bond, self-insurance, guaranty or an alternate
method subject to agency approval. Under OPA 90, an owner
or operator of a fleet of vessels is required only to
demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in an amount
sufficient to cover the tank in the fleet having the greatest
maximum limited liability under OPA 90 and CERCLA.
The Coast Guards regulations concerning certificates of
financial responsibility (or COFR) provide, in accordance
with OPA 90, that claimants may bring suit directly against
an insurer or guarantor that furnishes COFR. In addition, in the
event that such insurer or guarantor is sued directly, it is
prohibited from asserting any contractual defense that it may
have had against the responsible party and is limited to
asserting those defenses available to the responsible party and
the defense that the incident was caused by the willful
misconduct of the responsible party. Certain organizations,
which had typically provided COFR under pre-OPA 90 laws,
including the major protection and indemnity organizations, have
declined to furnish evidence of insurance for vessel owners and
operators if they are subject to direct actions or required to
waive insurance policy defenses.
The Coast Guards financial responsibility regulations may
also be satisfied by evidence of surety bond, guaranty or by
self-insurance. Under the self-insurance provisions, the
shipowner or operator must have a net worth and working capital,
measured in assets located in the United States against
liabilities located anywhere in the world, that exceeds the
applicable amount of financial responsibility. We have complied
with the Coast Guard regulations by obtaining financial
guaranties from a third party. If other vessels in our fleet
trade into the United States in the future, we expect to obtain
additional guaranties from third-party insurers or to provide
guaranties through self-insurance.
133
OPA 90 and CERCLA permit individual states to impose their
own liability regimes with regard to oil or hazardous substance
pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and some
states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited strict
liability for spills. We intend to comply with all applicable
state regulations in the ports where our vessels call.
Owners or operators of tank vessels operating in United States
waters are required to file vessel response plans with the Coast
Guard, and their tank vessels are required to operate in
compliance with their Coast Guard approved plans. Such response
plans must, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
address a worst case scenario and identify and
ensure, through contract or other approved means, the
availability of necessary private response resources to respond
to a worst case discharge; |
|
|
|
describe crew training and drills; and |
|
|
|
identify a qualified individual with full authority to implement
removal actions. |
We have filed vessel response plans with the Coast Guard for the
tankers we own and have received approval of such plans for all
vessels in our fleet to operate in United States waters. In
addition, we conduct regular oil spill response drills in
accordance with the guidelines set out in OPA 90. The Coast
Guard has announced it intends to propose similar regulations
requiring certain vessels to prepare response plans for the
release of hazardous substances.
OPA 90 allows U.S. state legislatures to pre-empt
associated regulation if the states regulations are equal
or more stringent. Several coastal states such as California,
Washington and Alaska require state-specific COFR and vessel
response plans.
CERCLA contains a similar liability regime to OPA 90, but
applies to the discharge of hazardous substances
rather than oil. Petroleum products and LNG should
not be considered hazardous substances under CERCLA, but
additives to oil or lubricants used on LNG carriers might fall
within its scope. CERCLA imposes strict joint and several
liability upon the owner, operator or bareboat charterer of a
vessel for cleanup costs and damages arising from a discharge of
hazardous substances.
OPA 90 and CERCLA do not preclude claimants from seeking
damages for the discharge of oil and hazardous substances under
other applicable law, including maritime tort law. Such claims
could include attempts to characterize the transportation of LNG
aboard a vessel as an ultra-hazardous activity under a doctrine
that would impose strict liability for damages resulting from
that activity. The application of this doctrine varies by
jurisdiction. There can be no assurance that a court in a
particular jurisdiction will not determine that the carriage of
oil or LNG aboard a vessel is an ultra-hazardous activity, which
would expose us to strict liability for damages we cause to
injured parties even when we have not acted negligently.
Environmental
Regulation Other Environmental Initiatives
Although the United States is not a party, many countries have
ratified and follow the liability scheme adopted by the IMO and
set out in the International Convention on Civil Liability for
Oil Pollution Damage, 1969, as amended (or CLC), and the
Convention for the Establishment of an International Fund for
Oil Pollution of 1971, as amended. Under these conventions,
which are applicable to vessels that carry persistent oil (not
LNG) as cargo, a vessels registered owner is strictly
liable for pollution damage caused in the territorial waters of
a contracting state by discharge of persistent oil, subject to
certain complete defenses. Many of the countries that have
ratified the CLC have increased the liability limits through a
1992 Protocol to the CLC. The liability limits in the countries
that have ratified this Protocol are currently approximately
$6.8 million plus approximately $953 per gross
registered tonne above 5,000 gross tonnes with an
approximate maximum of $136 million per vessel, with the
exact amount tied to a unit of account which varies according to
a basket of currencies. The right to limit liability is
forfeited under the CLC when the spill is caused by the
owners actual fault or privity and, under the 1992
Protocol, when the spill is caused by the owners
intentional or reckless conduct. Vessels trading to contracting
states must provide evidence of insurance covering the limited
liability of the owner. In
134
jurisdictions where the CLC has not been adopted, various
legislative schemes or common law governs, and liability is
imposed either on the basis of fault or in a manner similar to
the CLC.
In addition, the IMO, various countries and states, such as
Australia, the United States and the State of California, and
various regulators, such as port authorities, the
U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, have either adopted legislation or regulations, or are
separately considering the adoption of legislation or
regulations, aimed at regulating the transmission, distribution,
supply and storage of LNG, the discharge of ballast water and
the discharge of bunkers as potential pollutants.
Properties
Other than our vessels, we do not have any material property.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time we have been, and expect to continue to be,
subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course
of our business, principally personal injury and property
casualty claims. These claims, even if lacking merit, could
result in the expenditure of significant financial and
managerial resources. We are not aware of any legal proceedings
or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the
aggregate, a material adverse effect on us.
Taxation of the Partnership
Marshall Islands
Taxation
Based on the advice of Watson, Farley & Williams
(New York) LLP, our counsel as to matters of the law of the
Republic of the Marshall Islands, because we and our
subsidiaries do not, and we do not expect that we and our
subsidiaries will, conduct business or operations in the
Republic of the Marshall Islands, neither we nor our
subsidiaries will be subject to income, capital gains, profits
or other taxation under current Marshall Islands law. As a
result, distributions by our subsidiaries to us will not be
subject to Marshall Islands taxation.
Luxembourg Taxation
The following discussion is based upon the current tax laws of
Luxembourg and regulations, the Luxembourg tax administrative
practice and judicial decisions thereunder, all as in effect as
of the date of this prospectus and subject to possible change on
a retroactive basis. The following discussion is for general
information purposes only and does not purport to be a
comprehensive description of all of the Luxembourg income tax
considerations applicable to us.
Immediately following the closing of this offering, our
operating subsidiary, Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. (a
Marshall Islands company), will, through its direct Luxembourg
subsidiary, Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (or Luxco),
and other intermediary subsidiaries, indirectly hold all of our
operating assets. Luxco will be capitalized with equity and
loans from Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. Luxco will, in turn,
re-lend a substantial portion of the loan proceeds received from
Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. to Teekay Spain S.L. (or
Spainco). Luxco will use the remaining proceeds from the
loans from and equity purchases by Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C.
to purchase shares in Spainco.
Luxco is considered a Luxembourg resident company for Luxembourg
tax purposes subject to taxation in Luxembourg on its income
regardless of where the income is derived. The generally
applicable Luxembourg income tax rate is approximately 30%.
Taxation of Interest Income. Luxcos loans to
Spainco will generate interest income. However, this interest
income will be offset substantially by interest expense on the
loan made by Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. to Luxco, so we believe
that any taxation of that income will be immaterial.
135
Taxation of Interest Payments. Luxembourg does not
levy a withholding tax on interest paid to corporate entities
non-resident of Luxembourg, such as Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C.,
unless the interest represents an unlimited right to participate
in profits of the interest-paying entity, or the interest
payment relates to the portion of debt used to acquire share
capital and the debt exceeds a Luxembourg thin
capitalization threshold or the interest rate is not
regarded as arms length. Based on guidance received by
Teekay Shipping Corporation from the Luxembourg taxing
authority, we believe interest paid by Luxco on the types of
loans to be made to it by Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. will not
represent a right to participate in its profits and will be
consistent with Luxembourg transfer pricing rules. Furthermore,
we plan to capitalize Luxco to meet the thin
capitalization threshold. Accordingly, we believe that
interest payments made by Luxco to Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C.
will not be subject to Luxembourg withholding tax.
Taxation of Spainco Dividends and Capital Gains.
Pursuant to Luxembourg law, dividends received by Luxco
from Spainco and capital gains realized on any disposal of
Spainco shares generally will be exempt from Luxembourg taxation
if certain requirements are met. We believe that Luxco will meet
these requirements and that any dividend received on or any
capital gain resulting from the disposition of the shares of
Spainco will be exempt from taxation in Luxembourg.
Notwithstanding this exemption, Luxembourg law does not permit
the deduction of interest expense on loans specifically used to
purchase shares eligible for the dividend exemption, to the
extent of any dividends received the same year and derived from
the shares financed by the loans. Similarly, capital gains are
tax exempt only for the portion exceeding the interest expense
generated by the loan financing the purchase of shares and
previously deducted. We currently do not intend to dispose of
the shares of Spainco. However, we believe that any taxation on
any gain resulting from any disposition of the shares of Spainco
would not be material.
Taxation of Luxco Dividends. Luxembourg levies a
20% withholding tax on dividends paid by a Luxembourg company to
a non-resident of the European Union (absent a tax treaty),
which would apply to dividends paid by Luxco to Teekay LNG
Operating L.L.C. However, we do not expect to cause Luxco to pay
dividends, but to distribute all of its available cash through
the payment of interest and principal on its loans owing to
Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C., for at least the next ten years. We
may also recapitalize another Luxembourg company in the future
to continue this arrangement, as is permitted under current
Luxembourg tax rules.
The following discussion is based upon the tax laws of Spain and
regulations, rulings and judicial decisions thereunder, all as
in effect as of the date of this prospectus and subject to
possible change on a retroactive basis. The following discussion
is for general information purposes only and does not purport to
be a comprehensive description of all of the Spanish income tax
considerations applicable to us.
Spainco will own, directly and indirectly, a number of other
Spanish subsidiaries, including those operating all of our
Suezmax tankers and all of our LNG carriers as of the closing of
this offering.
Spainco and these subsidiaries will be considered Spanish
resident companies subject to Spanish taxation on their income
regardless of where the income is derived. The generally
applicable Spanish income tax rate is 35%. However,
substantially all of the income generated by these subsidiaries
will be subject to special tax incentives for shipping
activities, which we believe will substantially reduce the
amount of Spanish income tax payable.
Taxation of Spanish Subsidiaries Engaged in Shipping
Activities. Two alternative Spanish tax regimes provide
incentives for Spanish companies engaged in shipping activities.
The ships operated by our operating Spanish subsidiaries
currently are subject to the first regime, but, as discussed
below, we currently expect to transfer any eligible ships of
these subsidiaries to the second regime effective for the 2006
tax year.
To qualify under the first regime, the Spanish companys
vessels must be registered in the Canary Islands Special Ship
Registry. Under this registry, the Master and First Officer for
the vessel must be
136
Spanish nationals and at least 50% of the crew must be European
Union nationals. All of the vessels of our operating Spanish
subsidiaries currently are registered in the Canary Islands
Special Ship Registry and meet these ship personnel
requirements. As a result, we believe that these subsidiaries
qualify for the tax benefits associated with the first regime,
representing a credit equal to 90% against the tax otherwise
payable on income from the commercial operation of the vessels.
This credit effectively reduces the Spanish tax rate on this
income to approximately 3.5%. This deduction does not apply to
gains from vessel dispositions.
The second incentive regime, the Spanish Tonnage Tax Regime (or
the TTR), applies to Spanish companies that own or
operate vessels, but does not depend upon the registry of the
vessels. Consequently, there is no requirement for the vessel to
maintain the Spanish or Canary Island flag or to follow the
crewing requirements that correspond to these flags.
Under this regime, the applicable income tax is based on the
weight (measured as net tonnage) of the vessel and the number of
days during the taxable period that the vessel is at the
companys disposal, excluding time required for repairs.
The following table presents the applicable tax base for a
vessel under the TTR regime, against which the generally
applicable tax rate of 35% will apply:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnage Tax Base | |
Net Tonnage of Vessel |
|
Daily Rate per 100 Tonnes | |
|
|
| |
0 to 1,000
|
|
|
0.90 Euros |
|
1,001 to 10,000
|
|
|
0.70 Euros |
|
10,001 to 25,000
|
|
|
0.40 Euros |
|
Over 25,000
|
|
|
0.20 Euros |
|
To be eligible to apply the TTR regime:
|
|
|
|
|
a Spanish company must be enrolled in any Spanish registry for
shipping companies specified under the regime; |
|
|
|
the company must own or charter out vessels; |
|
|
|
the vessels must be managed strategically and commercially from
Spain or another country belonging to the European Union; and |
|
|
|
the vessels must engage in certain maritime-related activities,
including the transportation of goods or merchandise. |
The Spanish company must make a request of the Spanish tax
authorities that the TTR regime apply to its activities. If the
eligibility criteria indicated above are met, these requests
routinely are granted. If granted, the TTR regime will apply to
the company for an initial period of 10 years, which may be
extended for successive 10-year periods upon application by the
shipping company.
If the shipping company also engages in activities other than
those subject to the TTR regime, income from those other
activities will be subject to tax at the generally applicable
rate of 35%.
If a vessel is acquired and disposed of by a company while it is
subject to the TTR regime, any gain on the disposition of the
vessel generally is not subject to Spanish taxation. If the
company acquired the vessel prior to becoming subject to the TTR
regime, the difference between the fair market value of the
vessel at the time it enters into the TTR and the tax value of
the vessel at that time is added to the taxable income in Spain
when the vessel is disposed of and generally remains subject to
Spanish taxation at the rate of 35%.
We believe that the TTR regime provides several advantages over
the ship registry regime described above, including increased
flexibility on registering and crewing vessels, a lower overall
tax rate and a possible reduction in the Spanish tax on any gain
from the disposition of the vessels. As a result, we currently
expect to apply for all eligible ships to be taxed under the
Spanish TTR regime commencing with the 2006 tax year.
Taxation on Distributions by Spanish Entities.
Income distributed by our Spanish subsidiaries as
dividends may be subject to a 15% Spanish withholding tax,
unless the dividends are paid to an entity
137
resident in a tax treaty jurisdiction. In addition,
interest paid by Spanish entities on debt owed to non-residents
of Spain is generally subject to a 15% withholding tax.
Spainco has obtained shareholder approval for itself and its
subsidiaries to file a consolidated tax return for the 2005 tax
year. As a result, we believe that no withholding taxes should
apply to any interest or dividend payments made between Spainco
and its Spanish subsidiaries.
As described above, Spainco is capitalized with debt and equity
from Luxco, which owns 100% of Spainco. We expect that Spainco
will not pay dividends but will distribute all of its available
cash through the payment of interest and principal on its loans
owing to Luxco for at least the next ten years. Once these loans
are fully repaid, Spainco will distribute all of its available
cash to Luxco through dividends.
Pursuant to Spanish law, interest paid by Spainco to Luxco is
not subject to Spanish withholding tax if our Spanish
subsidiaries respect the debt-equity provisions applicable to
direct and indirect debt borrowed from non-European Union
resident related parties and if Luxco is a resident of
Luxembourg, Luxco does not have a permanent establishment in
Spain, and Luxco is not a company qualifying as a tax-exempt
1929 holding company under Luxembourg legislation. We believe
Luxco meets these requirements. Consequently, we believe that
interest paid by Spainco to Luxco should not be subject to
withholding tax in Spain.
Pursuant to the European Union Parent-Subsidiary Directive,
dividends paid by Spainco to Luxco will not be subject to
Spanish withholding taxes if Luxco meets an ownership
requirement and a Luxembourg presence requirement. We believe
that at the time of distributions Luxco will satisfy both the
ownership and Luxembourg presence requirements and qualify for
the Spanish withholding tax exemption on any dividends that
Spainco may pay to Luxco.
Qatar Taxation
The following discussion is based upon our knowledge of the tax
laws of Qatar and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions
thereunder, all as in effect as of the date of this prospectus
and subject to possible change on a retroactive basis. The Qatar
Public Revenue and Tax Department (or QPRTD) is not bound
by precedent. The following discussion is for general
information purposes only and does not purport to be a
comprehensive description of all of the Qatar income tax
considerations applicable to us.
The QPRTD has confirmed that foreign entities are subject to tax
in Qatar on income earned from international shipping within
Qatari waters. Qatar income tax is usually determined on a
consolidated basis for multiple foreign entities owned by a
common parent. In our case, the three RasGas II LNG carriers we
plan to operate in Qatar beginning in late 2006 will be operated
by separate shipowning subsidiaries owned by Teekay Nakilat
Corporation (or Teekay Nakilat).
Based on the QPRTDs confirmation, we believe that Teekay
Nakilats income earned from activity in Qatar will be
taxable. Because the time charter revenue we will earn from the
Qatari voyages will be earned on a daily or time use basis, we
believe it is more likely than not that this revenue will be
taxable in Qatar only in relation to the time the vessels
operate in Qatari waters.
Expenses specifically and demonstrably related to the revenue
taxable in Qatar should be deductible in calculating income
subject to Qatari tax. Based on past practice, we believe that:
|
|
|
|
|
in relation to expenses that are incurred wholly, necessarily
and exclusively in relation to the periods for which individual
vessels operate in Qatari waters, the QPRTD should accept these
expenses as a deduction in arriving at taxable income; |
|
|
|
in relation to expenses that accrue over the period of the
time-charter contract for each vessel, it is more likely than
not that the QPRTD will accept an apportionment of these
expenses as a deduction in arriving at taxable income based on
the time the vessel operates in Qatari waters as a proportion of
the total period of the charter; and |
|
|
|
in relation to depreciation of each of the vessels in a tax
year, the QPRTD should accept as a deduction in arriving at
taxable income an apportionment of the annual depreciation
allowance permitted under the tax law based on the time the
vessel operates in Qatari waters. |
138
Based on our anticipated operation of the three RasGas II LNG
carriers, we believe that the allocation and deduction of
operating expenses, tax depreciation and interest expense to the
revenue taxable in Qatar should result in no taxation in Qatar
for the first ten years of operation. Furthermore, because our
time charters with RasGas II provide for a gross up payment for
any Qatari tax Teekay Nakilat must pay with respect to its
operation of the LNG carriers in Qatari waters, we believe any
Qatari taxes will not affect our financial results.
139
MANAGEMENT
Management of Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
Teekay GP L.L.C., our general partner, will manage our
operations and activities. Unitholders will not be entitled to
elect the directors of our general partner or directly or
indirectly participate in our management or operation.
Our general partner owes a fiduciary duty to our unitholders.
Our general partner will be liable, as general partner, for all
of our debts (to the extent not paid from our assets), except
for indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly
nonrecourse to it. Whenever possible, our general partner
intends to cause us to incur indebtedness or other obligations
that are nonrecourse to it.
At least three members of the board of directors of our general
partner will serve on a conflicts committee to review specific
matters that the board believes may involve conflicts of
interest. The conflicts committee will determine if the
resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and reasonable to
us. The members of the conflicts committee may not be officers
or employees of our general partner or directors, officers or
employees of its affiliates, and must meet the independence
standards established by the New York Stock Exchange to serve on
an audit committee of a board of directors and certain other
requirements. Any matters approved by the conflicts committee
will be conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to us,
approved by all of our partners, and not a breach by our general
partner of any duties it may owe us or our unitholders. Our
initial conflicts committee will be comprised of the members of
our audit committee and will be appointed prior to the closing
of this offering. For additional information about the conflicts
committee, please read Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary
Duties Conflicts of Interest.
In addition, our general partner will have an audit committee of
at least three independent directors. The audit committee will,
among other things, review our external financial reporting,
engage our external auditors and oversee our internal audit
activities and procedures and the adequacy of our internal
accounting controls. Our general partner will also have a
corporate governance committee, which will oversee corporate
governance matters, director compensation and the compensation
plan described below.
The New York Stock Exchange does not require a listed limited
partnership like us to have a majority of independent directors
on the board of directors of our general partner or to establish
a compensation committee or a nominating/ corporate governance
committee. However, we intend that a majority of the directors
of our general partner will meet the independence standards of
the New York Stock Exchange and, as discussed above, to
establish and maintain a corporate governance committee.
The directors of our general partner oversee our operations. The
day-to-day affairs of our business are managed by the officers
of our general partner and key employees of certain of our
operating subsidiaries. Employees of certain subsidiaries of
Teekay Shipping Corporation will provide assistance to us and
our operating subsidiaries pursuant to services agreements.
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Advisory and Administrative Services
Agreements.
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our
general partner, Peter Evensen, will allocate his time between
managing our business and affairs and the business and affairs
of Teekay Shipping Corporation. Mr. Evensen is the
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Teekay
Shipping Corporation. The amount of time Mr. Evensen will
allocate between our business and the businesses of Teekay
Shipping Corporation will vary from time to time depending on
various circumstances and needs of the businesses, such as the
relative levels of strategic activities of the businesses.
Mr. Evensen will devote sufficient time to our business and
affairs as is necessary for their proper conduct.
Officers of Teekay LNG Projects Ltd., a subsidiary of Teekay
Shipping Corporation, will allocate their time between providing
LNG strategic consulting and advisory services to certain of our
operating subsidiaries and pursuing LNG project opportunities
for Teekay Shipping Corporation, which projects, if awarded to
Teekay Shipping Corporation, will be offered to us pursuant to
the noncompetition provisions
140
of the omnibus agreement. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions Omnibus
Agreement Noncompetition and
Advisory and Administrative Services
Agreements LNG Strategic Consulting and Advisory
Services Agreements Between Certain of Our Operating
Subsidiaries and Teekay Shipping Limited. The omnibus
agreement will also permit us to pay to Teekay Shipping
Corporation any incentive fees approved by the
conflicts committee of our general partners board of
directors, in its sole discretion, and relating to LNG projects
provided to us by Teekay Shipping Corporation. Any such fee
would be intended to reward Teekay Shipping Corporation for
obtaining, and to further motivate it in pursuing additional,
LNG projects. Teekay Shipping Corporation, in turn, may pay
incentive fees to Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. for LNG projects
awarded to it as a result of the efforts of Teekay LNG Projects
Ltd.
Officers of our general partner and those individuals providing
services to us or our subsidiaries may face a conflict regarding
the allocation of their time between our business and the other
business interests of Teekay Shipping Corporation. Our general
partner intends to seek to cause its officers to devote as much
time to the management of our business and affairs as is
necessary for the proper conduct of our business and affairs.
Directors, Executive Officers and Key Employees
The following table provides information about the directors and
executive officers of our general partner and key employees of
our operating subsidiary Teekay Spain. Directors are elected for
one-year terms. The business address of each of our directors
and executive officers listed below is c/o TK House,
Bayside Executive Park, West Bay Street and Blake Road, Nassau,
Commonwealth of The Bahamas. The business address of each of our
key employees of Teekay Spain is Musgo Street 528023,
Madrid, Spain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
C. Sean Day
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Chairman |
Bjorn Moller
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Vice Chairman and Director |
Peter Evensen
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director |
Robert E. Boyd
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director |
Ida Jane Hinkley
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Director |
Ihab J.M. Massoud
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Director |
George Watson
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Director |
Bruce C. Bell
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Secretary |
Andres Luna
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Managing Director, Teekay Spain |
Pedro Solana
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Director, Finance and Accounting, Teekay Spain |
Certain biographical information about each of these individuals
is set forth below.
C. Sean Day has served as Chairman of Teekay
GP L.L.C. since it was formed in November 2004.
Mr. Day has served as Chairman of Teekay Shipping
Corporations board of directors since 1999. From 1989 to
1999, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Navios
Corporation, a large bulk shipping company based in Stamford,
Connecticut. Prior to this, Mr. Day held a number of senior
management positions in the shipping and finance industry. He is
currently serving as a director of Kirby Corporation.
Mr. Day also serves as the Chairman of Resolute
Investments, Inc., the largest stockholder of Teekay Shipping
Corporation.
Bjorn Moller has served as the Vice Chairman and a
Director of Teekay GP L.L.C. since it was formed in
November 2004. Mr. Moller is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Teekay Shipping Corporation and has held
those positions since April 1998. Mr. Moller has over
20 years experience in the shipping industry and has
served in senior management positions with Teekay Shipping
Corporation for more than 15 years. He has headed its
overall operations since January 1997, following his promotion
to the position of Chief Operating Officer. Prior to this,
Mr. Moller headed Teekay Shipping Corporations global
chartering operations and business development activities.
141
Peter Evensen has served as the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of Teekay GP L.L.C. since it
was formed in November 2004 and as a Director of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since January 2005. Mr. Evensen is also the
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Teekay
Shipping Corporation. He joined Teekay Shipping Corporation in
May 2003 as Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer. He was appointed to his current positions with Teekay
Shipping Corporation in February 2004. Mr. Evensen has over
20 years experience in banking and shipping finance.
Prior to joining Teekay Shipping Corporation, Mr. Evensen
was Managing Director and Head of Global Shipping at
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and worked in other senior
positions for its predecessor firms. His international industry
experience includes positions in New York, London and Oslo.
Robert E. Boyd has served as a Director of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since January 2005. From May 1999 until his retirement in
March 2004, Mr. Boyd was employed as the Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Teknion Corporation, a
company engaged in the design, manufacture and marketing of
office systems and office furniture products. From 1991 to 1999,
Mr. Boyd was employed by The Oshawa Group Limited, a
company engaged in the wholesale and retail distribution of food
products and real estate activities, where his positions
included Executive Vice President-Financial and Chief Financial
Officer.
Ida Jane Hinkley has served as a Director of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since January 2005. From 1998 to 2001, she served as
Managing Director of Navion Shipping AS, a shipping company at
that time affiliated with the Norwegian state-owned oil company
Statoil ASA (and subsequently acquired by Teekay Shipping
Corporation in 2003). From 1980 to 1997, Ms. Hinkley was
employed by the Gotaas-Larsen Shipping Corporation, an
international provider of marine transportation services for
crude oil and gas (including LNG), serving as its Chief
Financial Officer from 1988 to 1992 and its Managing Director
from 1993 to 1997.
Ihab J.M. Massoud has served as a Director of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since January 2005. Since 1998, he has been President of
The Compass Group International LLC, a private equity investment
firm based in Westport, Connecticut and an affiliate of Teekay
Shipping Corporation. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Massoud was
employed by Petroleum Heat and Power, Inc. as a Vice President.
From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Massoud was a Vice President of
Colony Capital, Inc., a Los Angeles-based private equity firm
specializing in acquiring distressed real estate and corporate
assets.
George Watson has served as a Director of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since January 2005. Since July 2002, he has served as
Chief Executive Officer of CriticalControl Solutions Inc.
(formerly WNS Emergent), a provider of information control
applications for the energy sector. From February 2000 to July
2002, he served as Executive Chairman at VerticalBuilder.com
Inc. Mr. Watson served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. from 1993 to 1999 and as its Chief
Financial Officer from 1990 to 1993.
Bruce C. Bell has served as the Secretary of Teekay GP
L.L.C. since it was formed in November 2004. Since March 1994,
Mr. Bell has been employed as the Managing Director of
Oceanic Bank and Trust Limited, a Bahamian bank and trust
company. Prior to joining Oceanic Bank and Trust, Mr. Bell
was engaged in the private practice of law in Canada,
specializing in corporate/ commercial, banking and international
business transactions. From May 2000 until May 2003,
Mr. Bell served as the Corporate Secretary of Teekay
Shipping Corporation. Mr. Bell is a director of Teekay
Shipping Corporation and a director and the Vice President of
Resolute Investments, Inc., the largest stockholder of Teekay
Shipping Corporation.
Andres Luna has served as the Managing Director of Teekay
Spain since April 2004. Mr. Luna joined Alta Shipping,
S.A., a former affiliate company of Naviera
F. Tapias S.A., in September 1992 and served as its
General Manager until he was appointed Commercial General
Manager of Naviera F. Tapias S.A. in December 1999. He
also served as Chief Executive Officer of Naviera F.
Tapias S.A. from July 2000 until its acquisition by
Teekay Shipping Corporation in April 2004, when it was
renamed Teekay Spain. Mr. Lunas responsibilities with
Teekay Spain have included business development, newbuilding
contracting, project management, development of its LNG business
and the renewal of its tanker fleet. He
142
has been in the shipping business since his graduation as a
naval architect from Madrid University in 1981.
Pedro Solana has served as the Director, Finance and
Accounting of Teekay Spain since August 2004.
Mr. Solana joined Naviera F. Tapias S.A. in 1991 and
served as Deputy Financial Manager until its acquisition by
Teekay Shipping Corporation. Mr. Solanas
responsibilities with Teekay Spain have included oversight of
its accounting department and arranging for financing of its LNG
carriers and crude oil tankers. He has been in the shipping
business since 1980.
Officers of Teekay LNG Projects Ltd.
The following table provides information about the officers of
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation. As described above, Teekay LNG
Projects Ltd. will provide certain LNG strategic consulting and
advisory services to Teekay Spain and certain of our other
operating subsidiaries pursuant to services agreements and will
pursue LNG projects on behalf of Teekay Shipping Corporation,
which will be offered to us pursuant to the omnibus agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
David Glendinning
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
President |
Kenneth Hvid
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Senior Vice President |
Roy Spires
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Vice President, Finance |
David Glendinning has served as the President of Teekay
LNG Projects Ltd. since it was formed in November 2004.
Mr. Glendinning is also the President of Teekay Shipping
Corporations Teekay Gas and Offshore division, and has
held this position since November 2003. Since joining Teekay
Shipping Corporation, Mr. Glendinning has worked in a
number of other senior positions with Teekay Shipping
Corporation, including Vice President, Marine and Commercial
Operations from January 1995 until his promotion to Senior Vice
President, Customer Relations and Marine Project Development in
February 1999. Prior to joining Teekay Shipping Corporation,
Mr. Glendinning, who is a Master Mariner, had
18 years sea service on oil tankers of various types
and sizes.
Kenneth Hvid has served as Senior Vice President for
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. since it was formed in
November 2004. Mr. Hvid is also Senior Vice President, Gas
Services of Teekay Shipping Corporation, a position he has held
since January 2004. Mr. Hvid joined Teekay Shipping
Corporation in October 2000, and was responsible for its
purchasing activities as Director, Procurement until he was
promoted to his current position. Prior to joining Teekay
Shipping Corporation, Mr. Hvid worked for 12 years for
A.P. Moller in various functions in Copenhagen, San Francisco
and Hong Kong.
Roy Spires has served as Vice President, Finance of
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. since it was formed in
November 2004. Mr. Spires has served as Teekay
Shipping Corporations Vice President, Finance from
February 2004 until the closing of this offering. He also served
as Teekay Shipping Corporations Director of Finance from
November 1999 until February 2004. Prior to joining Teekay
Shipping Corporation, Mr. Spires spent seven years
with a publicly traded Canadian corporation, where his positions
included Treasurer and Corporate Secretary. His experience
includes over 17 years of management positions in
commercial and corporate banking.
Reimbursement of Expenses of Our General Partner
Our general partner will not receive any management fee or other
compensation for managing us. Our general partner and its other
affiliates will be reimbursed for expenses incurred on our
behalf. These expenses include all expenses necessary or
appropriate for the conduct of our business and allocable to us,
as determined by our general partner.
143
Executive Compensation
We and our general partner were formed in November 2004.
Our general partner has neither paid any compensation to its
directors or officers nor accrued any obligations with respect
to management incentive or retirement benefits for the directors
and officers prior to this offering. Because the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner,
Peter Evensen, is an employee of Teekay Shipping Corporation,
his compensation (other than any awards under the long-term
incentive plan described below) will be set and paid by Teekay
Shipping Corporation, and we will reimburse Teekay Shipping
Corporation for time he spends on partnership matters. Our
general partner will compensate Bruce Bell for time he spends on
partnership matters and may grant Mr. Bell awards under the
long-term incentive plan described below. The corporate
governance committee of the board of directors of our general
partner initially will establish the compensation for certain
key employees of our operating subsidiary Teekay Spain. Officers
and employees of our general partner or its affiliates may
participate in employee benefit plans and arrangements sponsored
by Teekay Shipping Corporation, our general partner or their
affiliates, including plans that may be established in the
future.
Compensation of Directors
Officers of our general partner or Teekay Shipping Corporation
who also serve as directors of our general partner will not
receive additional compensation for their service as directors.
Our general partner anticipates that each non-management
director will receive compensation for attending meetings of the
board of directors, as well as committee meetings. We expect
non-management directors will receive a director fee of $30,000
per year and 700 common units subject to vesting over a
three-year period. We intend to grant the common units to the
non-management directors concurrently with this offering.
Members of the audit and conflicts committees each will receive
a committee fee of $5,000 per year, and the chair of the audit
committee is expected to receive an additional fee of $5,000 for
serving in that role. In addition, each director will be
reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with
attending meetings of the board of directors or committees. Each
director will be fully indemnified by us for actions associated
with being a director to the extent permitted under Marshall
Islands law.
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Our general partner has adopted the Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan for employees and directors of and
consultants to our general partner and employees and directors
of and consultants to its affiliates, who perform services for
us. The plan provides for the award of restricted units, phantom
units, unit options, unit appreciation rights and other unit or
cash-based awards.
Administration. The plan will be administered by
the corporate governance committee of the board of directors of
our general partner. To the extent permitted by law, the
corporate governance committee may delegate any or all of its
powers and duties under the plan to the chief executive officer
of our general partner, subject to any limitations imposed by
the corporate governance committee and certain other limitations
imposed by the plan. The corporate governance committee will
have the authority to, among other things, designate
participants under the plan, determine the type or types of
awards to be granted to a participant, determine the number of
common units to be covered by awards, determine the terms and
conditions applicable to awards and interpret and administer the
plan.
Number of Common Units. Subject to adjustment in
the event of any distribution, recapitalization, split, merger,
consolidation and the like, the number of common units available
for delivery pursuant to awards granted under the plan is
1,000,000. There is no limit on the number of awards that may be
granted and paid in cash. If any award is forfeited or otherwise
terminates or is cancelled without delivery of common units,
those units will again by available for grant under the plan.
Common units delivered under the plan will consist of units
acquired by our general partner on the open market, from us or
from any other person or entity.
Restricted Units and Phantom Units. A restricted
unit is a common unit subject to forfeiture prior to the vesting
of the award. A phantom unit is a notional unit that entitles
the grantee to receive a common
144
unit upon the vesting of the phantom unit or, in the discretion
of the corporate governance committee, cash equivalent to the
value of a common unit. The corporate governance committee may
determine to make grants under the plan of restricted units and
phantom units to plan participants containing such terms as the
corporate governance committee may determine. The corporate
governance committee will determine the period over which
restricted units and phantom units granted to plan participants
will vest. The committee may base its determination upon the
achievement of specified performance goals. The corporate
governance committee, in its discretion, may provide tandem
vesting with respect to distributions on restricted units and
may grant tandem distribution equivalent rights with respect to
phantom units.
Unit Options and Unit Appreciation Rights. The
plan will permit the grant of options covering common units and
the grant of unit appreciation rights. A unit appreciation right
is an award that, upon exercise, entitles the participant to
receive the excess of the fair market value of a unit on the
exercise date over the base price established for the unit
appreciation right. Such excess may be paid in common units,
cash, or a combination thereof, as determined by the corporate
governance committee in its discretion. The corporate governance
committee will be able to make grants of unit options and unit
appreciation rights under the plan to employees, consultants and
directors containing such terms as the committee may determine.
Unit options and unit appreciation rights may have an exercise
price or base price that is no less than the fair market value
of the common units on the date of grant. In general, unit
options and unit appreciation rights granted will become
exercisable over a period determined by the corporate governance
committee.
Other Unit or Cash-Based Awards. Subject to the
terms of the plan and such other terms and conditions as the
corporate governance committee deems appropriate, the corporate
governance committee may grant other incentives payable in cash
or in common units under the plan.
Vesting, Exercisability and Payment of Options.
Unless otherwise provided in the instrument evidencing
an option, (a) in the event of a participants
termination of service for any reason other than cause, death,
disability or retirement, the participant may exercise any
vested options for a period of three months from the date of
such termination, (b) in the event of a participants
termination of service due to retirement or disability, the
participant may exercise any vested options for a period of five
years from the date of such termination and (c) in the
event of a participants termination of service due to
death, the participants beneficiary may exercise any
vested options for a period of two years from the date of such
termination. In the event a participant dies after termination
of service but while the option is otherwise exercisable, the
participants beneficiary may exercise vested stock options
for a period of two years from the date of death, unless the
corporate governance committee determines otherwise. If a
participant is terminated for cause, his or her option will
automatically expire, unless the corporate governance committee
determines otherwise. In no event may an option be exercised
after the expiration of the term provided in the instrument
evidencing the option.
Change of Control. Unless otherwise provided in
the instrument evidencing the award, in the event of a change of
control of Teekay LNG Partners L.P., our general partner or
Teekay Shipping Corporation, all outstanding awards will become
fully and immediately exercisable and all applicable deferral
and restriction limitations will lapse, unless the awards are
converted, assumed or replaced by the successor company.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to options and unit
appreciation rights, the corporate governance committee may
instead provide for the cash-out of such awards in connection
with the change of control transaction. Also notwithstanding the
foregoing, if so determined by the corporate governance
committee, during the 60-day period from and after the change of
control transaction, a participant holding an option or unit
appreciation right will have the right to elect to surrender all
or part of the option or unit appreciation right in exchange for
a cash payment. If following a change of control transaction, a
participants service is terminated for cause or good
reason within 24 months of the transaction, any awards held
by that participant that remain unvested will become fully and
immediately exercisable, all applicable deferral and restriction
limitations will lapse and an award that is an option or unit
appreciation right will remain exercisable until the later of
five years after the date of termination and the date the award
would have expired by its terms if the participants
service had not terminated.
145
Term, Termination and Amendment of Plan. Our
general partners board of directors, or its corporate
governance committee, in its discretion may terminate, suspend
or discontinue the plan at any time with respect to any award
that has not yet been granted. Our general partners board
of directors, or its corporate governance committee, also has
the right to alter or amend the plan or any part of the plan
from time to time, including increasing the number of common
units that may be granted subject to unitholder approval as
required by the exchange upon which the common units are listed
at that time. However, other than adjustments to outstanding
awards upon the occurrence of certain unusual or nonrecurring
events, no change in any outstanding grant may be made that
would materially impair the rights of the participant without
the consent of the participant.
146
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of units
of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. that will be issued upon the
consummation of this offering and the related transactions and
held by beneficial owners of 5% or more of the units and by all
directors and officers of our general partner as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
Total Common | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Subordinated | |
|
Subordinated | |
|
and Subordinated | |
|
|
Units to be | |
|
Units to be | |
|
Units to be | |
|
Units to be | |
|
Units to be | |
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Teekay Shipping Corporation(1)(2)
|
|
|
8,734,572 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
% |
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
79.6 |
% |
All executive officers, key employees and directors as a group
(10 persons)(3)
|
|
|
252,836 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes the 2% general partner interest held by our general
partner, a wholly owned subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation. |
|
|
|
(2) |
If the underwriters exercise the over-allotment option in full,
(a) Teekay Shipping Corporations percentage of common
units to be beneficially owned will decrease to 55.9% and its
percentage of total common and subordinated units to be
beneficially owned will decrease to 77.3% and (b) the
percentages of (i) common units and (ii) common units
and subordinated units beneficially owned by the executive
officers, key employees and directors as a group will decrease
to 1.6% and 0.8%, respectively. |
|
|
(3) |
Excludes units owned by Teekay Shipping Corporation, on the
board of which serve the directors of our general partner, C.
Sean Day and Bjorn Moller. In addition, Mr. Moller is
Teekay Shipping Corporations chief executive officer, and
Peter Evensen, our general partners chief executive
officer, chief financial officer and director, is Teekay
Shipping Corporations chief financial officer.
Mr. Day and our Secretary, Bruce C. Bell, also serve as
directors and as the Chairman and Vice President, respectively,
of Teekay Shipping Corporations largest stockholder. |
147
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
After this offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation, the owner of
our general partner, will own 8,734,572 common units and
14,734,572 subordinated units, representing a 78.0% limited
partner interest in us. In addition, our general partner will
own a 2% general partner interest in us.
Distributions and Payments to the General Partner and Its
Affiliates
The following table summarizes the distributions and payments to
be made by us to our general partner and its affiliates in
connection with our formation, ongoing operation and any
liquidation. These distributions and payments were determined by
and among affiliated entities and, consequently, are not the
result of arms-length negotiations.
|
|
|
|
The consideration received by our general partner and its
affiliates for the contribution to us of the assets and
liabilities |
|
8,734,572 common units;
14,734,572 subordinated units;
2% general partner interest in us; and
the incentive distribution rights. |
|
|
|
|
|
The common units and subordinated units owned by Teekay Shipping
Corporation represent a 78.0% limited partner interest in us,
which gives it the ability to control the outcome of unitholder
votes on certain matters. For more information, please read
The Partnership Agreement Voting Rights
and Amendment of the Partnership
Agreement. |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions of available cash to our general partner and its
affiliates |
|
We will generally make cash distributions 98% to unitholders
(including Teekay Shipping Corporation, the owner of our general
partner and the holder of 8,734,572 common units and
14,734,572 subordinated units) and the remaining 2% to our
general partner. |
|
|
|
|
In addition, if distributions exceed the minimum quarterly
distribution and other higher target levels, our general
partner, as the holder of the incentive distribution rights,
will be entitled to increasing percentages of the distributions,
up to 50% of the distributions above the highest target level.
We refer to the rights to the increasing distributions as
incentive distribution rights. Please read
Cash Distribution Policy Incentive
Distribution Rights for more information regarding the
incentive distribution rights. |
|
|
|
Assuming we have sufficient available cash to pay the full
minimum quarterly distribution on all of our outstanding units
for four quarters, our general partner would receive an annual
distribution of approximately $1.0 million on its 2%
general partner interest and Teekay Shipping Corporation would
receive an annual distribution of approximately
$38.7 million on its common units and subordinated units. |
|
Payments to our general partner and its affiliates |
|
Our general partner will not receive a management fee or other
compensation for the management of our partnership. Our general
partner and its other affiliates will be entitled to
reimbursement for all direct and indirect expenses they incur on |
148
|
|
|
|
|
our behalf. In addition, we and certain of our operating
subsidiaries will pay fees to certain subsidiaries of Teekay
Shipping Corporation for strategic consulting, advisory, ship
management, technical and administrative services. We may also
pay Teekay Shipping Corporation incentive fees to
reward and motivate it for pursuing LNG projects that we may
have the right to engage in pursuant to the omnibus agreement
with Teekay Shipping Corporation. Our general partner will
determine the amount of these reimbursable expenses and will
negotiate these fees. |
|
Withdrawal or removal of our general partner |
|
If our general partner withdraws or is removed, its general
partner interest and its incentive distribution rights will
either be sold to the new general partner for cash or converted
into common units, in each case for an amount equal to the fair
market value of those interests. Please read The
Partnership Agreement Withdrawal or Removal of the
General Partner. |
|
|
|
Liquidation |
|
Upon our liquidation, the partners, including our general
partner, will be entitled to receive liquidating distributions
according to their particular capital account balances. |
Agreements Governing the Transactions
We, our general partner, our operating companies and other
parties have entered into or will enter into various documents
and agreements that will effect the transactions relating to our
formation and this offering, including the vesting of assets in,
and the assumption of liabilities by, us and our subsidiaries
and the application of the proceeds of this offering. These
agreements will not be the result of arms-length
negotiations and they, or any of the transactions that they
provide for, may not be effected on terms at least as favorable
to the parties to these agreements as they could have obtained
from unaffiliated third parties. All of the transaction expenses
incurred in connection with these transactions, including the
expenses associated with vesting assets in our subsidiaries,
will be paid from the proceeds of this offering.
Omnibus Agreement
At the closing of this offering, we will enter into an omnibus
agreement with Teekay Shipping Corporation, our general partner,
and our operating company, Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C. The
following discussion describes provisions of the omnibus
agreement.
Under the omnibus agreement, Teekay Shipping Corporation will
agree, and will cause its controlled affiliates (other than us,
our general partner and our subsidiaries) to agree, not to own,
operate or charter LNG carriers. This restriction will not
prevent Teekay Shipping Corporation or any of its controlled
affiliates (other than us and our subsidiaries) from:
|
|
|
|
|
acquiring LNG carriers and related time charters as part of a
business and operating or chartering those vessels if a majority
of the value of the total assets or business acquired is not
attributable to the LNG carriers and related time charters, as
determined in good faith by the board of directors of Teekay
Shipping Corporation; however, if at any time Teekay Shipping
Corporation completes such an acquisition, it must offer to sell
the LNG carriers and related time charters to us for their fair
market value plus any additional tax or other similar costs to
Teekay Shipping Corporation that would be required to transfer
the LNG carriers and time charters to us separately from the
acquired business; |
149
|
|
|
|
|
owning, operating or chartering LNG carriers that relate to a
bid or award for a proposed LNG project that Teekay or any of
its subsidiaries has submitted or hereafter submits or receives;
however, at least 180 days prior to the scheduled delivery date
of any such LNG carrier, Teekay Shipping Corporation must offer
to sell the LNG carrier and related time charter to us, with the
vessel valued at its fully-built-up cost, which
represents the aggregate expenditures incurred (or to be
incurred prior to delivery to us) by Teekay Shipping Corporation
to acquire or construct and bring such LNG carrier to the
condition and location necessary for our intended use; |
|
|
|
owning, operating or chartering LNG carriers subject to the
offers to us described in the preceding two paragraphs pending
our determination whether to accept such offers and pending the
closing of any offers we accept; |
|
|
|
acquiring, operating or chartering LNG carriers if our general
partner has previously advised Teekay Shipping Corporation that
the board of directors of our general partner has elected, with
the approval of its conflicts committee, not to cause us or our
subsidiaries to acquire or operate the carriers; |
|
|
|
owning or operating any of the three RasGas II LNG newbuilding
carriers and related time charters if we fail to perform our
obligation to purchase such vessels under our agreement with
Teekay Shipping Corporation (please read
Agreement to Purchase RasGas II Interest); |
|
|
|
acquiring up to a 9.9% equity ownership, voting or profit
participation interest in any publicly traded company that owns
or operates LNG carriers; or |
|
|
|
providing ship management services relating to LNG carriers. |
If Teekay Shipping Corporation or any of its controlled
affiliates (other than us or our subsidiaries) owns, operates or
charters LNG carriers pursuant to any of the exceptions
described above, it may not subsequently expand that portion of
its business other than pursuant to those exceptions.
The omnibus agreement will also permit us to pay to Teekay
Shipping Corporation any incentive fees approved by
the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general
partner, in its sole discretion and relating to LNG projects
provided to us by Teekay Shipping Corporation. Although the
timing and amount of and criteria for any such discretionary
incentive fees are not set forth in the omnibus agreement, any
such fee would be intended to reward Teekay Shipping Corporation
for obtaining, and to further motivate it in pursuing
additional, LNG projects.
In addition, under the omnibus agreement we will agree, and will
cause our subsidiaries to agree, not to own, operate or charter
crude oil tankers. This restriction will not:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
apply to any oil tankers owned, operated or chartered by us or
any of our subsidiaries as of the closing of this offering, and
the ownership, operation or chartering of any oil tankers that
replace any of those oil tankers (or Replacement Oil
Tankers) in connection with: |
|
|
|
|
|
the destruction or total loss of the original tanker; the tanker
being damaged to an extent that makes repairing it uneconomical
or renders it permanently unfit for normal use, as determined in
good faith by our general partner within 90 days after the
occurrence of the damage; or the tankers condemnation,
confiscation, requisition or a similar taking of title to or use
of it that continues for at least six months; or |
|
|
|
the replacement of a time charter existing on the closing of
this offering, where the tanker that was subject to the charter
has been sold or transferred due to the exercise by the customer
of its right under the charter to cause the sale or transfer; |
|
|
|
(2) prevent us or any of our subsidiaries from: |
|
|
|
|
|
acquiring oil tankers and any related time charters as part of a
business and operating or chartering those vessels, if a
majority of the value of the total assets or business acquired
is not attributable to the oil tankers and any related charters,
as determined by the |
150
|
|
|
|
|
conflicts committee of our general partners board of
directors; however, if at any time we complete such an
acquisition, we are required to promptly offer to sell the oil
tankers and time charters to Teekay Shipping Corporation for
fair market value plus any additional tax or other similar costs
to us that would be required to transfer the oil tankers and
time charters to Teekay Shipping Corporation separately from the
acquired business; |
|
|
|
owning, operating or chartering crude oil tankers subject to the
offer to Teekay Shipping Corporation described in the preceding
paragraph pending its determination whether to accept such offer
and pending the closing of any offer it accepts; |
|
|
|
acquiring up to a 9.9% equity ownership, voting or profit
participation interest in any publicly traded company that owns
or operates crude oil tankers; or |
|
|
|
acquiring, operating or chartering oil tankers if Teekay
Shipping Corporation has previously advised our general partner
that it has elected not to acquire or operate those tankers. |
If we or any of our subsidiaries owns, operates or charters oil
tankers pursuant to any of the exceptions described above,
neither we nor such subsidiary may subsequently expand that
portion of our business other than pursuant to those exceptions.
If Teekay Shipping Corporation or its affiliates no longer
control our general partner or there is a change of control of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, our general partner or Teekay
Shipping Corporation, respectively, may terminate the
noncompetition provisions of the omnibus agreement.
|
|
|
Rights of First Offer on Suezmax Tankers and LNG
Carriers |
Under the omnibus agreement, we and our subsidiaries will grant
to Teekay Shipping Corporation a 30-day right of first offer on
any proposed (a) sale, transfer or other disposition of any
of our Suezmax tankers or (b) re-chartering of any of our
Suezmax tankers pursuant to a time charter with a term of at
least three years if the existing charter expires or is
terminated early. Likewise, Teekay Shipping Corporation will
agree (and will cause its subsidiaries to agree) to grant a
similar right of first offer to us for any LNG carriers it might
own. These rights of first offer will not apply to (a) a
sale, transfer or other disposition of vessels between any
affiliated subsidiaries, or pursuant to the terms of any charter
or other agreement with a charter party or (b) the
re-chartering of any Replacement Oil Tanker to another charter
party that is not an affiliate of the existing charter party.
Prior to engaging in any negotiation regarding any vessel
disposition or re-chartering with a non-affiliated third-party,
the applicable party will deliver a written notice setting forth
the material terms and conditions of the proposed transaction.
During the 30-day period after the delivery of such notice, we
will negotiate in good faith with Teekay Shipping Corporation to
reach an agreement on the transaction. If we do not reach an
agreement within such 30-day period, we or Teekay Shipping
Corporation, as the case may be, will be able within the next
180 days to sell, transfer, dispose or re-charter the
vessel to a third party (or to agree in writing to undertake
such transaction with a third party) on terms generally no less
favorable to us or Teekay Shipping Corporation, as the case may
be, than those offered pursuant to the written notice.
If Teekay Shipping Corporation or its affiliates no longer
control our general partner or there is a change of control of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, our general partner or Teekay
Shipping Corporation, respectively, may terminate these rights
of first offer provisions of the omnibus agreement.
Under the omnibus agreement, Teekay Shipping Corporation will
indemnify us after the closing of this offering for a period of
five years against certain environmental and toxic tort
liabilities to the extent arising prior to the closing date of
this offering. Liabilities resulting from a change in law after
the closing of this offering are excluded from the environmental
indemnity. There is an aggregate cap of $10.0 million
151
on the amount of indemnity coverage provided by Teekay Shipping
Corporation for these environmental and toxic tort liabilities.
Teekay Shipping Corporation will also indemnify us for
liabilities related to:
|
|
|
|
|
certain defects in title to the assets contributed to us and any
failure to obtain, prior to the closing of this offering,
certain consents and permits necessary to conduct our business,
which liabilities arise within three years after the
closing of this offering; and |
|
|
|
certain income tax liabilities attributable to the operation of
the assets contributed to us prior to the time they were
contributed. |
The omnibus agreement may not be amended without the prior
approval of the conflicts committee of the board of directors of
our general partner if the proposed amendment will, in the
reasonable discretion of our general partner, adversely affect
holders of our common units.
Advisory and Administrative Services Agreements
|
|
|
Administrative Services Agreement Between Us and Teekay
Shipping Limited |
At the closing of this offering, we will enter into a services
agreement with Teekay Shipping Limited, a Bahamian corporation
and wholly owned subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation,
pursuant to which Teekay Shipping Limited will provide certain
non-strategic administrative services to us, unless the
provision of those services by Teekay Shipping Limited would
materially interfere with Teekay Shipping Corporations
operations. These services will be provided in a commercially
reasonably manner and upon the reasonable request of our general
partner. Teekay Shipping Limited will provide these services to
us directly but may subcontract for certain of these services
with other entities, including other Teekay Shipping Corporation
subsidiaries. We will pay a reasonable, arms-length fee to
Teekay Shipping Limited for such services that will include
reimbursement of the reasonable cost of any direct and indirect
expenses it incurs in providing these services. We will
indemnify Teekay Shipping Limited for losses it incurs in
connection with providing the services, excluding losses caused
by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Teekay Shipping
Limited or its employees or agents. The services will include:
|
|
|
|
|
legal, investor relations and financial compliance services; |
|
|
|
bookkeeping and accounting services; and |
|
|
|
banking and finance services. |
|
|
|
Advisory, Technical and Administrative Services Agreements
Between Certain of Our Operating Subsidiaries and Teekay
Shipping Limited |
Our operating subsidiary Teekay Spain will enter into an
Advisory, Technical and Administrative Services Agreement with
Teekay Shipping Limited, pursuant to which Teekay Shipping
Limited will provide advisory, technical and administrative
services that supplement the existing capabilities of Teekay
Spains employees. These services will be provided in a
commercially reasonably manner and upon the reasonable request
of Teekay Spain. Teekay Shipping Limited will provide these
services directly but may subcontract for certain of these
services with other entities, including other Teekay Shipping
Corporation subsidiaries. Teekay Spain will pay a reasonable,
arms-length fee to Teekay Shipping Limited that will
include reimbursement of the reasonable cost of any direct and
indirect expenses it incurs in providing these services, which
include services such as:
|
|
|
|
|
vessel maintenance; |
|
|
|
crewing; |
|
|
|
purchasing; |
152
|
|
|
|
|
shipyard supervision; |
|
|
|
insurance; and |
|
|
|
financial services. |
At the closing of this offering, our subsidiary that will own
the Granada Spirit will enter into a similar agreement
with Teekay Shipping Limited, and we anticipate that similar
contracts will be entered into with Teekay Shipping Limited
after the closing as we establish other operating subsidiaries
as part of our business, including the entities that will
operate the RasGas II vessels described below under
Agreement to Purchase RasGas II Interest.
|
|
|
LNG Strategic Consulting and Advisory Services Agreement
Between Certain of Our Operating Subsidiaries and Teekay LNG
Projects Ltd. |
At the closing of this offering, our operating subsidiary Teekay
Spain will enter into a services agreement with Teekay LNG
Projects Ltd., a Canadian corporation and wholly owned
subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation, pursuant to which
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. will provide to Teekay Spain strategic
consulting and advisory services relating to our LNG business,
unless the provision of those services by Teekay LNG Projects
Ltd. would materially interfere with Teekay Shipping
Corporations operations. These services will be provided
in a commercially reasonably manner and upon the reasonable
request of Teekay Spain. Information about the officers of
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. who will provide services to Teekay
Spain is included above under Management
Officers of Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. Teekay Spain will pay
a reasonable, arms-length fee for these services that will
include reimbursement of the reasonable cost to Teekay LNG
Projects Ltd. of any direct and indirect expenses it incurs in
providing the services. Services that Teekay LNG Projects Ltd.
will provide include advice and assistance regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
strategic planning; |
|
|
|
business development opportunities; |
|
|
|
integration of any acquired businesses; |
|
|
|
client relations; and |
|
|
|
any other matters relating to the business of Teekay
Spains LNG business that Teekay Spain may request
assistance with, to the extent Teekay LNG Projects Ltd. has
knowledge or experience related to such matters. |
We anticipate that as we establish certain other LNG operating
subsidiaries as part of our business they will seek to enter
into similar agreements with Teekay LNG Projects Ltd.
Joint Venture with an Entity Controlled by Mr. Fernando
Tapias
Teekay Shipping Corporation and F. Tapias Grupo de Sociedades e
Inversiones, S.L. (or Tapias Grupo), an entity controlled
by Fernando Tapias, the former controlling shareholder of
Tapias, formed a joint venture (the Teekay Joint Venture)
when Teekay Shipping Corporation acquired Tapias in April 2004.
The primary purpose of the joint venture is to provide marine
transportation of oil and gas. As part of the joint venture,
each partner has agreed that it will give the joint venture the
first opportunity to pursue any new oil or gas marine
transportation opportunities that become available to such
partner and relate only to the Spanish market or are led by
Spanish entities or entities controlled by a Spanish company. If
the joint ventures board of directors which is
composed of an equal number of designees of each
partner determines not to pursue such an
opportunity, then the partner proposing the opportunity may
pursue it independently of the joint venture. Prior to
Teekays acquisition of Tapias, Mr. Tapias had been
involved in the energy marine transportation industry through
Spanish companies since 1991, and he has established many
relationships in that market.
Prior to the closing of this offering, Teekay Shipping
Corporation and Tapias Grupo will amend the Teekay Joint Venture
to provide that Teekay Shipping Corporation may offer to us its
interest in any
153
LNG marine transportation opportunity the joint venture elects
to pursue. In that case, we will enter into a joint venture
agreement with Tapias Grupo in respect of the LNG opportunity,
which agreement will be based on the existing Teekay Joint
Venture agreement, with appropriate modifications. Pursuant to
the omnibus agreement referred to above, Teekay Shipping
Corporation will offer these opportunities to us, subject to the
exceptions set forth in the omnibus agreement.
Teekay Spain will operate any LNG carriers acquired by the joint
venture between Tapias Grupo and us. We and Tapias Grupo will
share profits and losses of the joint venture in proportion to
the partners relative capital contributions. Each partner
will have equal voting power. The joint venture agreement will
provide a right of first refusal to the partners if either
partner seeks to transfer its joint venture interest. If one of
the partners materially breaches the joint venture agreement and
fails to cure the breach, the other partner may purchase the
breaching partners joint venture interest at a 20%
discount.
Granada Spirit Charter and Purchase Agreement
The Granada Spirit is a single-hulled tanker that was
built in 1990 and acquired by Tapias. The Granada Spirit
has operated in the spot market. In the fourth quarter of 2004,
the vessel was transferred to another subsidiary of Teekay
Shipping Corporation not organized in Spain in connection with a
significant drydocking and re-flagging the vessel.
At the closing of this offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation
will contribute to us the Granada Spirit to provide
interim cash flows to us until delivery of our Suezmax
newbuilding, the Toledo Spirit, and will enter into a
short-term, fixed-rate time charter to increase the
predictability and stability of that cash flow compared to the
Granada Spirits prior operation in the spot market.
The charter will terminate upon the earlier of the delivery of
the Toledo Spirit, which is scheduled for July 20,
2005, or December 31, 2005, subject to an early termination
right of Teekay Shipping Corporation. Upon termination of the
charter, Teekay Shipping Corporation will purchase the vessel.
If the Toledo Spirit is delivered on time as scheduled,
Teekay Shipping Corporation will purchase the Granada
Spirit for $19.5 million. If the Toledo Spirit
is delivered after July 20, 2005, the $19.5 million
purchase price will be reduced by $250,000 per month, or portion
of a month. Teekay Shipping Corporation will also have the right
to terminate the charter and purchase the Granada Spirit
at any time prior to July 20, 2005 and prior to delivery of
the Toledo Spirit. If Teekay Shipping Corporation
exercises this right, it will pay us $19.5 million plus
$600,000 for each month, or portion of a month, we do not have
the benefit of the time charter prior to July 20, 2005. The
additional payment reflects the estimated monthly depreciation
and the amount of cash flow we would otherwise earn on the
Granada Spirit pending the scheduled delivery of the
Toledo Spirit.
The relationship of the purchase price of the Granada
Spirit to the then-prevailing fair market value of the
vessel will depend largely upon spot market rates at that time.
We have agreed to sell the Granada Spirit to Teekay
Shipping Corporation because it is not a double-hulled vessel
subject to a long-term time charter, as are the other vessels in
our fleet, and because its useful life as a single-hulled tanker
is substantially diminished by IMO requirements that will
require its phase-out.
Agreement to Purchase RasGas II Interest
Upon the closing of this offering, we will enter into a purchase
agreement with Teekay Shipping Corporation pursuant to which it
will agree to sell to us its 100% ownership interest in Teekay
Nakilat Holdings Corporation (or Teekay Nakilat
Holdings). Teekay Nakilat Holdings currently owns 100% of
Teekay Nakilat Corporation (or Teekay Nakilat), which in
turn owns three subsidiaries, each of which has contracted to
have built one of the RasGas II LNG newbuildings. These
three newbuilding vessels are subject to 20-year, fixed-rate
time charters to RasGas II, which will commence upon
commercial operation of the vessels, scheduled for various times
during the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first half of 2007. We
will purchase Teekay Shipping Corporations interest in
Teekay Nakilat Holdings at approximately the time of the
delivery of the first newbuilding, which will include assumption
of the debt financing the vessels and remaining construction
installment payments. This arrangement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation regarding the RasGas II vessels allows us to
defer our need to finance these vessels
154
until closer to the time the vessels are delivered and begin
operating, which will reduce our need to finance construction
installment payments.
As part of its proposal to provide transportation services for
the LNG project related to the RasGas II vessels, Teekay
Shipping Corporation agreed that Qatar Gas Transport Company
Ltd. (or Qatar Gas) will have three options to purchase
up to an aggregate 30% interest in the RasGas II vessels
through ownership in either Teekay Nakilat or Teekay
Nakilats shipowning subsidiaries. These options are
exercisable up to the delivery of each of the three
RasGas II vessels. Accordingly, we will own between a 70%
and 100% indirect interest in each of the RasGas II vessels
and related time charters, depending upon whether and to what
extent Qatar Gas Transport exercises these options. Payments
made by Qatar Gas Transport upon any exercise of its options
will, if made prior to our purchase of Teekay Shipping
Corporations interest in Teekay Nakilat Holdings, reduce
our purchase price.
Our aggregate purchase price for Teekay Shipping
Corporations interest in Teekay Nakilat Holdings will
reimburse Teekay Shipping Corporation for its costs related to
the construction and delivery of the three RasGas II
vessels and compensate it for its cost of capital on
construction payments made to the shipyard.
Teekay Shipping Corporation will provide all capital required to
finance the construction of the three RasGas II vessels
until our purchase of Teekay Nakilat Holdings. The total price
payable to the shipyard for each vessel is approximately
$171.5 million, payable in five equal installments of
approximately $34.3 million each. Teekay Shipping
Corporation paid the first installment on each vessel in July
2004; remaining installments are due at varying times for each
vessel from May 2005 until April 2007. To compensate Teekay
Shipping Corporation for its cost of capital in making these
installment payments, interest will accrue and be capitalized at
the rate of 8.5%, compounded annually from the date of each
installment payment until payment by us to Teekay Shipping
Corporation of the purchase price. Based on an estimated
purchase date on the scheduled delivery date of the first
newbuilding in the fourth quarter of 2006, we estimate that the
aggregate amount of these capitalized financing costs will be
approximately $46.2 million.
Costs for which we will reimburse Teekay Shipping Corporation,
or pay directly after purchasing Teekay Nakilat Holdings,
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Depot Spares. Teekay Nakilat will purchase spare
parts for the LNG carriers during their construction periods.
These depot spares are critical replacement parts
that are purchased in advance of being required due to long
order lead times to procure these parts at a later stage.
Purchasing the spares in advance avoids or minimizes any vessel
downtime if these parts are required with little notice. Depot
spare costs are estimated to be $2.2 million per vessel. |
|
|
|
Provisions for Modifications. These costs relate
to potential vessel modifications that the customer may request
during the vessel construction period, which Teekay Nakilat
initially will fund. The estimated cost is $2.5 million per
vessel. |
|
|
|
Supervision and Management. These costs cover
Teekay Nakilats expense in supervising construction of the
vessels at the shipyard. Estimated costs are approximately $1.3
million per vessel. |
|
|
|
Other Costs. These costs represent other
significant costs incurred by Teekay Nakilat such as vessel
start-up costs, crew training, crew supplies and flag
registration. The total of these other costs is estimated to be
$2.6 million per vessel. |
|
|
|
Financing Costs. Teekay Shipping Corporation
Nakilat has arranged for long-term financing for the three
RasGas II vessels, which are obligations of the ship owning
subsidiaries of Teekay Nakilat, and are guaranteed by Teekay
Shipping Corporation. To the extent Teekay Shipping Corporation
or Teekay Nakilat pays the closing costs relating to this
financing, we will reimburse it. Closing costs for this
financing are estimated to be $2.0 million per vessel. |
155
The total cost for the three vessels, including shipyard
payments, the capitalized financing cost and the other costs
described above, is estimated to be approximately
$592 million. The long-term vessel financing will cover
approximately $468 million of this amount. Disregarding the
effect of any payments made by Qatar Gas Transport to exercise
its options, we will be required to fund the remaining
approximately $124.5 million as part of our purchase price
for Teekay Shipping Corporations interest in Teekay
Nakilat Holdings. An initial installment equal to 90% of the
estimated purchase price will be payable upon delivery of the
first vessel, with the balance due within 90 days of delivery of
the third vessel. Payments will be made in either cash or our
common units, at Teekay Shipping Corporations election
made at least 90 days prior to payment thereof, or such
other consideration as agreed between Teekay Shipping
Corporation and the conflicts committee of our general
partners board of directors. Payments in our common units
will be valued at their average closing price during the
10-trading day period immediately preceding the payment or, if
lower, their price per share to the public in any offering
undertaken by us to partially finance our purchase.
Agreement Relating to Toledo Spirit
Following its delivery scheduled for July 2005, our Suezmax
tanker the Toledo Spirit will operate pursuant to a time
charter that has a component to increase or decrease the fixed
rate established in the charter, depending upon the spot charter
rates that we would have earned had we traded the vessel in the
spot tanker market. To increase the consistency of our revenue
stream from this charter, upon the closing of this offering, we
will enter into an agreement with Teekay Shipping Corporation
that will effectively eliminate the effects of this variable
component of the charter arrangement. Pursuant to the agreement,
(a) Teekay Shipping Corporation will pay, or reimburse us for,
amounts payable to the charter party as a result of spot rates
being below the fixed rate and (b) we will pay, or cause payment
to be made to, Teekay Shipping Corporation for amounts payable
to us as a result of spot rates being in excess of the fixed
rate.
Sale of Suezmax Newbuilding
In March 2005, we completed a sale of a Suezmax newbuilding to
Teekay Shipping Corporation for $70.0 million, what we
believe was the tankers approximate fair market value. We
paid $48.6 million for the construction of the tanker,
which was delivered in March 2004, and agreed to the sale
in October 2004.
Directors and Officers of Our General Partner and Key
Employees
The Chairman of our general partner, C. Sean Day, and our
general partners Secretary, Bruce Bell, are directors and
the Chairman and Vice President, respectively, of Resolute
Investments, Inc., the largest stockholder of Teekay
Shipping Corporation. Mr. Bell is the Managing Director of
Oceanic Bank and Trust Limited, to which Teekay Shipping
Corporation paid approximately $0.5 million in 2004 for
corporate administration fees and shared office costs.
Mr. Day is also the Chairman of Teekay Shipping Corporation
and his consulting company provides services primarily to
affiliates of Teekay Shipping Corporation. Another director of
our general partner, Ihab J.M. Massoud, is President of The
Compass Group International LLC, a private equity
investment firm affiliated with Teekay Shipping Corporation.
Until November 2004, Andres Luna, the Managing Director of
Teekay Spain, was a stockholder of Alta Shipping S.A., a
former affiliate of Teekay Spain and currently an affiliate of
Teekay Shipping Corporation. In each of 2002, 2003 and 2004,
Teekay Spain paid ship brokerage commissions to Alta
Shipping S.A. relating to Suezmax tanker time charters in
amounts totaling no more than 1.0 million Euros
($1.26 million).
156
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND FIDUCIARY DUTIES
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of interest exist and may arise in the future as a
result of the relationships between our general partner and its
affiliates, including Teekay Shipping Corporation, on the one
hand, and us and our unaffiliated limited partners, on the other
hand. The directors and officers of our general partner, Teekay
GP L.L.C., have certain fiduciary duties to manage our
general partner in a manner beneficial to its owners. At the
same time, our general partner has a fiduciary duty to manage us
in a manner beneficial to us and our unitholders.
Our partnership affairs are governed by our partnership
agreement and the Marshall Islands Act. The provisions of the
Marshall Islands Act resemble provisions of the limited
partnership laws of a number of states in the United States,
most notably Delaware. We are not aware of any material
difference in unitholder rights between the Marshall Islands Act
and the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. The
Marshall Islands Act also provides that it is to be interpreted
according to the non-statutory law of the State of Delaware.
There have been, however, few, if any, court cases in the
Marshall Islands interpreting the Marshall Islands Act, in
contrast to Delaware, which has a fairly well-developed body of
case law interpreting its limited partnership statute.
Accordingly, we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts
would reach the same conclusions as courts in Delaware. For
example, the rights of our unitholders and fiduciary
responsibilities of our general partner under Marshall Islands
law are not as clearly established as under judicial precedent
in existence in Delaware. Due to the less developed nature of
Marshall Islands law, our public unitholders may have more
difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions
by our general partner or controlling unitholders than would
unitholders of a limited partnership organized in the United
States.
Whenever a conflict arises between our general partner or its
affiliates, on the one hand, and us or any other partner, on the
other, our general partner will resolve that conflict. Our
partnership agreement contains provisions that modify and limit
our general partners fiduciary duties to the unitholders
under Marshall Islands law. Our partnership agreement also
restricts the remedies available to unitholders for actions
taken by our general partner.
Our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations
under the partnership agreement or its duties to us or the
unitholders if the resolution of the conflict is:
|
|
|
|
|
approved by the conflicts committee, although our general
partner is not obligated to seek such approval; |
|
|
|
approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common
units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner
or any of its affiliates; |
|
|
|
on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being
provided to or available from unrelated third parties, but the
general partner is not required to obtain confirmation to such
effect from an independent third party; or |
|
|
|
fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of
the relationships between the parties involved, including other
transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous
to us. |
Our general partner may, but is not required to, seek the
approval of such resolution from the conflicts committee of the
board of directors of our general partner. If our general
partner does not seek approval from the conflicts committee, and
the board of directors of our general partner determines that
the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the
conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth
in the third and fourth bullet points above, then it will be
presumed that, in making its decision, the board of directors
acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on
behalf of any limited partner or the partnership, the person
bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of
overcoming such presumption. Unless the resolution of a conflict
is specifically provided for in our partnership agreement, our
general partner or the conflicts committee may consider any
factors it
157
determines in good faith to consider when resolving a conflict.
When our partnership agreement requires someone to act in good
faith, it requires that person to reasonably believe that he is
acting in the best interests of the partnership, unless the
context otherwise requires. Please read
Management Management of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. for information about the composition and formation
of the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our
general partner.
Conflicts of interest could arise in the situations described
below, among others.
|
|
|
Actions taken by our general partner may affect the amount
of cash available for distribution to unitholders or accelerate
the right to convert subordinated units. |
The amount of cash that is available for distribution to
unitholders is affected by decisions of our general partner
regarding such matters as:
|
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of asset purchases and sales; |
|
|
|
cash expenditures; |
|
|
|
borrowings; |
|
|
|
the issuance of additional units; and |
|
|
|
the creation, reduction or increase of reserves in any quarter. |
In addition, borrowings by us and our affiliates do not
constitute a breach of any duty owed by our general partner to
our unitholders, including borrowings that have the purpose or
effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
enabling our general partner or its affiliates to receive
distributions on any subordinated units held by them or the
incentive distribution rights; or |
|
|
|
hastening the expiration of the subordination period. |
For example, in the event we have not generated sufficient cash
from our operations to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on
our common units and our subordinated units, our partnership
agreement permits us to borrow funds, which would enable us to
make this distribution on all outstanding units. Please read
Cash Distribution Policy Subordination
Period.
Our partnership agreement provides that we and our subsidiaries
may borrow funds from our general partner and its affiliates.
Our general partner and its affiliates may not borrow funds from
us, our operating company, or its operating subsidiaries.
We do not have any officers
and rely solely on officers of Teekay GP L.L.C.
Affiliates of our general partner, Teekay GP L.L.C.,
conduct businesses and activities of their own in which we have
no economic interest. If these separate activities are
significantly greater than our activities, there could be
material competition for the time and effort of the officers who
provide services to Teekay GP L.L.C. and its affiliates.
The officers of Teekay GP L.L.C. are not required to work
full-time on our affairs. These officers are required to devote
time to the affairs of Teekay GP L.L.C. or its affiliates,
and we reimburse their employers for the services they render to
Teekay GP L.L.C. and its subsidiaries. None of the officers of
our general partner are employees of our general partner. Our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer is also an
executive officer of Teekay Shipping Corporation.
We will reimburse our
general partner and its affiliates for expenses.
We will reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for
costs incurred in managing and operating us, including costs
incurred in rendering corporate staff and support services to
us. Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner
will determine the expenses that are allocable to us in good
faith. Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions and Management
Reimbursement of Expenses of Our General Partner.
158
Our general partner intends
to limit its liability regarding our obligations.
Our general partner intends to limit its liability under
contractual arrangements so that the other party has recourse
only to our assets and not against our general partner or its
assets or any affiliate of our general partner or its assets.
Our partnership agreement provides that any action taken by our
general partner to limit its or our liability is not a breach of
our general partners fiduciary duties, even if we could
have obtained terms that are more favorable without the
limitation on liability.
|
|
|
Common unitholders will have no right to enforce
obligations of our general partner and its affiliates under
agreements with us. |
Any agreements between us, on the one hand, and our general
partner and its affiliates, on the other, will not grant to the
unitholders, separate and apart from us, the right to enforce
the obligations of our general partner and its affiliates in our
favor.
|
|
|
Contracts between us, on the one hand, and our general
partner and its affiliates, on the other, will not be the result
of arms-length negotiations. |
Neither our partnership agreement nor any of the other
agreements, contracts and arrangements between us and our
general partner and its affiliates are or will be the result of
arms-length negotiations. Our partnership agreement
generally provides that any affiliated transaction, such as an
agreement, contract or arrangement between us and our general
partner and its affiliates, must be:
|
|
|
|
|
on terms no less favorable to us then those generally being
provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or |
|
|
|
fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the
totality of the relationships between the parties involved
(including other transactions that may be particularly favorable
or advantageous to us). |
Our general partner may also enter into additional contractual
arrangements with any of its affiliates on our behalf; however,
there is no obligation of our general partner and its affiliates
to enter into any contracts of this kind.
|
|
|
Common units are subject to our general partners
limited call right. |
Our general partner may exercise its right to call and purchase
common units as provided in the partnership agreement or assign
this right to one of its affiliates or to us. Our general
partner may use its own discretion, free of fiduciary duty
restrictions, in determining whether to exercise this right. As
a result, a common unitholder may have common units purchased
from the unitholder at an undesirable time or price. Please read
The Partnership Agreement Limited Call
Right.
|
|
|
We may not choose to retain separate counsel for ourselves
or for the holders of common units. |
The attorneys, independent accountants and others who perform
services for us have been retained by our general partner.
Attorneys, independent accountants and others who perform
services for us are selected by our general partner or the
conflicts committee and may perform services for our general
partner and its affiliates. We may retain separate counsel for
ourselves or the holders of common units in the event of a
conflict of interest between our general partner and its
affiliates, on the one hand, and us or the holders of common
units, on the other, depending on the nature of the conflict. We
do not intend to do so in most cases.
|
|
|
Our general partners affiliates may compete with
us. |
Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner will
be restricted from engaging in any business activities other
than acting as our general partner and those activities
incidental to its ownership of interests in us. In addition, our
partnership agreement provides that our general partner, for so
long as it is general partner of our partnership, will cause its
affiliates not to engage in, by acquisition or otherwise, the
businesses described above under the caption Certain
Relationships and Related Party
159
Transactions Omnibus Agreement
Noncompetition. Similarly, under the omnibus agreement,
Teekay Shipping Corporation will agree and will cause it
affiliates to agree, for so long as Teekay Shipping Corporation
controls our partnership, not to engage in the businesses
described above under the caption Certain Relationships
and Related Party Transactions Omnibus
Agreement Noncompetition. Except as provided
in our partnership agreement and the omnibus agreement,
affiliates of our general partner are not prohibited from
engaging in other businesses or activities, including those that
might be in direct competition with us.
Fiduciary Duties
Our general partner is accountable to us and our unitholders as
a fiduciary. Fiduciary duties owed to unitholders by our general
partner are prescribed by law and the partnership agreement. The
Marshall Islands Act provides that Marshall Islands partnerships
may, in their partnership agreements, restrict or expand the
fiduciary duties owed by the general partner to the limited
partners and the partnership.
Our partnership agreement contains various provisions
restricting the fiduciary duties that might otherwise be owed by
our general partner. We have adopted these provisions to allow
our general partner to take into account the interests of other
parties in addition to our interests when resolving conflicts of
interest. We believe this is appropriate and necessary because
the board of directors of our general partner has fiduciary
duties to manage our general partner in a manner beneficial both
to its owner, Teekay Shipping Corporation, as well as to you.
These modifications disadvantage the common unitholders because
they restrict the rights and remedies that would otherwise be
available to unitholders for actions that, without those
limitations, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty, as
described below. The following is a summary of:
|
|
|
|
|
the fiduciary duties imposed on our general partner by the
Marshall Islands Act; |
|
|
|
material modifications of these duties contained in our
partnership agreement; and |
|
|
|
certain rights and remedies of unitholders contained in the
Marshall Islands Act. |
|
|
|
Marshall Islands law fiduciary duty standards |
|
Fiduciary duties are generally considered to include an
obligation to act in good faith and with due care and loyalty.
The duty of care, in the absence of a provision in a partnership
agreement providing otherwise, would generally require a general
partner to act for the partnership in the same manner as a
prudent person would act on his own behalf. The duty of loyalty,
in the absence of a provision in a partnership agreement
providing otherwise, would generally prohibit a general partner
of a Marshall Islands limited partnership from taking any action
or engaging in any transaction where a conflict of interest is
present. |
|
Partnership agreement modified standards |
|
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that waive or
consent to conduct by our general partner and its affiliates
that might otherwise raise issues as to compliance with
fiduciary duties under the laws of the Marshall Islands. For
example, Section 7.9 of our partnership agreement provides
that when our general partner is acting in its capacity as our
general partner, as opposed to in its individual capacity, it
must act in good faith and will not be subject to
any other standard under the laws of the Marshall Islands. In
addition, when our general partner is acting in its individual
capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our general partner,
it may act without any fiduciary obligation to us or the
unitholders whatsoever. These standards reduce the obligations
to which our general partner would otherwise be held. |
160
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement generally provides that affiliated
transactions and resolutions of conflicts of interest not
involving a vote of unitholders and that are not approved by the
conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general
partner must be: |
|
|
|
on terms no less favorable to us than those
generally being provided to or available from unrelated third
parties; or |
|
|
|
fair and reasonable to us, taking into
account the totality of the relationships between the parties
involved (including other transactions that may be particularly
favorable or advantageous to us). |
|
|
|
If our general partner does not seek approval from the conflicts
committee, and the board of directors of our general partner
determines that the resolution or course of action taken with
respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either of the
standards set forth in the bullet points above, then it will be
presumed that, in making its decision, the board of directors
acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on
behalf of any limited partner or the partnership, the person
bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of
overcoming such presumption. These standards reduce the
obligations to which our general partner would otherwise be held. |
|
|
|
In addition to the other more specific provisions limiting the
obligations of our general partner, our partnership agreement
further provides that our general partner and its officers and
directors will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our
limited partners or assignees for errors of judgment or for any
acts or omissions unless there has been a final and
non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction
determining that the general partner or its officers and
directors acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud, willful
misconduct or gross negligence. |
|
Rights and remedies of unitholders |
|
The provisions of the Marshall Islands Act resemble the
provisions of the limited partnership act of Delaware. For
example, like Delaware, the Marshall Islands Act favors the
principles of freedom of contract and enforceability of
partnership agreements and allows the partnership agreement to
contain terms governing the rights of the unitholders. The
rights of our unitholders, including voting and approval rights
and the ability of the partnership to issue additional units,
are governed by the terms of our partnership agreement. Please
read The Partnership Agreement. |
|
|
|
As to remedies of unitholders, the Marshall Islands Act permits
a limited partner to institute legal action on behalf of the
partnership to recover damages from a third party where a
general partner has refused to institute the action or where an
effort to cause a general partner to do so is not likely to
succeed. These actions include actions against a general partner
for breach of its fiduciary duties or of the partnership
agreement. |
161
In order to become one of our limited partners, a common
unitholder is required to agree to be bound by the provisions in
the partnership agreement, including the provisions discussed
above. This is in accordance with the policy of the Marshall
Islands Act favoring the principle of freedom of contract and
the enforceability of partnership agreements. The failure of a
limited partner or assignee to sign a partnership agreement does
not render the partnership agreement unenforceable against that
person.
Under the partnership agreement, we must indemnify our general
partner and its officers and directors to the fullest extent
permitted by law, against liabilities, costs and expenses
incurred by our general partner or these other persons. We must
provide this indemnification unless there has been a final and
non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction
determining that these persons acted in bad faith or engaged in
fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence. We also must
provide this indemnification for criminal proceedings when our
general partner or these other persons acted with no reasonable
cause to believe that their conduct was unlawful. Thus, our
general partner could be indemnified for its negligent acts if
it met the requirements set forth above. To the extent that
these provisions purport to include indemnification for
liabilities arising under the Securities Act, in the opinion of
the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
contrary to public policy and therefore unenforceable. Please
read The Partnership Agreement
Indemnification.
162
DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMON UNITS
The Units
The common units and the subordinated units represent limited
partner interests in us. The holders of units are entitled to
participate in partnership distributions and exercise the rights
and privileges available to limited partners under our
partnership agreement. For a description of the relative rights
and privileges of holders of common units and subordinated units
in and to partnership distributions, please read this section
and Cash Distribution Policy. For a description of
the rights and privileges of limited partners under our
partnership agreement, including voting rights, please read
The Partnership Agreement.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The Bank of New York will serve as registrar and transfer agent
for the common units. We pay all fees charged by the transfer
agent for transfers of common units, except the following, which
must be paid by unitholders:
|
|
|
|
|
surety bond premiums to replace lost or stolen certificates,
taxes and other governmental charges; |
|
|
|
special charges for services requested by a holder of a common
unit; and |
|
|
|
other similar fees or charges. |
There is no charge to unitholders for disbursements of our cash
distributions. We will indemnify the transfer agent, its agents
and each of their stockholders, directors, officers and
employees against all claims and losses that may arise out of
acts performed or omitted for its activities in that capacity,
except for any liability due to any gross negligence or
intentional misconduct of the indemnified person or entity.
The transfer agent may resign, by notice to us, or be removed by
us. The resignation or removal of the transfer agent will become
effective upon our appointment of a successor transfer agent and
registrar and its acceptance of the appointment. If a successor
has not been appointed or has not accepted its appointment
within 30 days after notice of the resignation or removal,
our general partner may act as the transfer agent and registrar
until a successor is appointed.
Transfer of Common Units
The transfer of the common units to persons that purchase
directly from the underwriters will be accomplished through the
completion, execution and delivery of a transfer application by
the investor. Any later transfers of a common unit will not be
recorded by the transfer agent or recognized by us unless the
transferee executes and delivers a transfer application. By
executing and delivering a transfer application, the transferee
of common units:
|
|
|
|
|
becomes the record holder of the common units and is an assignee
until admitted into our partnership as a substituted limited
partner; |
|
|
|
automatically requests admission as a substituted limited
partner in our partnership; |
|
|
|
agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of, and executes,
our partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
represents that the transferee has the capacity, power and
authority to enter into the partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
grants powers of attorney to officers of our general partner and
any liquidator of us as specified in the partnership agreement;
and |
|
|
|
gives the consents and approvals contained in our partnership
agreement, such as the approval of all transactions and
agreements we are entering into in connection with our formation
and this offering. |
163
An assignee will become a substituted limited partner of our
partnership for the transferred common units automatically upon
the recording of the transfer on our books and records. Our
general partner will cause any unrecorded transfers for which a
completed and duly executed transfer application has been
received to be recorded on our books and records no less
frequently than quarterly.
A transferees broker, agent or nominee may complete,
execute and deliver a transfer application. We are entitled to
treat the nominee holder of a common unit as the absolute owner.
In that case, the beneficial holders rights are limited
solely to those that it has against the nominee holder as a
result of any agreement between the beneficial owner and the
nominee holder.
Common units are securities and are transferable according to
the laws governing transfer of securities. In addition to other
rights acquired upon transfer, the transferor gives the
transferee the right to request admission as a substituted
limited partner in our partnership for the transferred common
units. A purchaser or transferee of common units who does not
execute and deliver a transfer application obtains only:
|
|
|
|
|
the right to assign the common unit to a purchaser or other
transferee; and |
|
|
|
the right to transfer the right to seek admission as a
substituted limited partner in our partnership for the
transferred common units. |
Thus, a purchaser or transferee of common units who does not
execute and deliver a transfer application:
|
|
|
|
|
will not receive cash distributions or federal income tax
allocations, unless the common units are held in a nominee or
street name account and the nominee or broker has
executed and delivered a transfer application; and |
|
|
|
may not receive some U.S. federal income tax information or
reports furnished to record holders of common units. |
The transferor of common units has a duty to provide the
transferee with all information that may be necessary to
transfer the common units. The transferor does not have a duty
to ensure the execution of the transfer application by the
transferee and has no liability or responsibility if the
transferee neglects or chooses not to execute and forward the
transfer application to the transfer agent. Please read
The Partnership Agreement Status as Limited
Partner or Assignee.
Until a common unit has been transferred on our books, we and
the transfer agent may treat the record holder of the unit as
the absolute owner for all purposes, except as otherwise
required by law or stock exchange regulations.
164
THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material provisions of our
partnership agreement. The form of our partnership agreement is
included in this prospectus as Appendix A. The partnership
agreement and limited liability company agreements of our
subsidiaries are included as exhibits to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part. We will provide
prospective investors with a copy of these agreements upon
request at no charge.
We summarize the following provisions of our partnership
agreement elsewhere in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
with regard to distributions of available cash, please read
Cash Distribution Policy; |
|
|
|
with regard to the transfer of common units, please read
Description of the Common Units Transfer of
Common Units; and |
|
|
|
with regard to allocations of U.S. federal taxable income
and loss, please read Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Consequences. |
Organization and Duration
We were organized on November 3, 2004 and have perpetual
existence.
Purpose
Our purpose under the partnership agreement is limited to
serving as the sole member of our operating company, Teekay LNG
Operating L.L.C., and engaging in any business activities that
may be engaged in by our operating company or that are approved
by our general partner. The operating agreement of our operating
company provides that it may, directly or indirectly, engage in
operations as conducted immediately before our initial public
offering or any other activity approved by our general partner.
Although our general partner has the ability to cause us, our
operating company or its subsidiaries to engage in activities
other than the marine transportation of liquefied natural gas
and crude oil, our general partner has no current plans to do so
and may decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or
obligation whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including
any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us or
the limited partners. Our general partner is authorized in
general to perform all acts it determines to be necessary or
appropriate to carry out our purposes and to conduct our
business.
Power of Attorney
Each limited partner, and each person who acquires a unit from
another unitholder and executes and delivers a transfer
application, grants to our general partner and, if appointed, a
liquidator, a power of attorney to, among other things, execute
and file documents required for our qualification, continuance
or dissolution. The power of attorney also grants our general
partner the authority to amend, and to make consents and waivers
under, the partnership agreement.
Capital Contributions
Unitholders are not obligated to make additional capital
contributions, except as described below under
Limited Liability.
165
Voting Rights
The following matters require the unitholder vote specified
below. Matters requiring the approval of a unit
majority require:
|
|
|
|
|
during the subordination period, the approval of a majority of
the common units, excluding those common units held by our
general partner and its affiliates, and a majority of the
subordinated units, voting as separate classes; and |
|
|
|
after the subordination period, the approval of a majority of
the common units. |
In voting their common and subordinated units, the general
partner and its affiliates will have no fiduciary duty or
obligation whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including
any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us and
the limited partners.
|
|
|
Action |
|
Unitholder Approval Required |
|
|
|
Issuance of additional units
|
|
No approval rights. |
|
Amendment of the partnership agreement
|
|
Certain amendments may be made by the general partner without
the approval of the unitholders. Other amendments generally
require the approval of a unit majority. Please read
Amendment of the Partnership Agreement. |
|
Amendment of the operating agreement of the operating company
and other action taken by us as a member of the operating company
|
|
Unit majority if such amendment or other action would adversely
affect our limited partners (or any particular class of limited
partners) in any material respect. Please read
Action Relating to the Operating Company. |
|
Merger of our partnership or the sale of all or substantially
all of our assets
|
|
Unit majority. Please read Merger, Sale or Other
Disposition of Assets. |
|
Dissolution of our partnership
|
|
Unit majority. Please read Termination and
Dissolution. |
|
Reconstitution of our partnership upon dissolution
|
|
Unit majority. Please read Termination and
Dissolution. |
|
Withdrawal of the general partner
|
|
Under most circumstances, the approval of a majority of the
common units, excluding common units held by the general partner
and its affiliates, is required for the withdrawal of the
general partner prior to March 31, 2015 in a manner which
would cause a dissolution of our partnership. Please read
Withdrawal or Removal of the General
Partner. |
|
Removal of the general partner
|
|
Not less than
662/3%
of the outstanding units, voting as a single class, including
units held by our general partner and its affiliates. Please
read Withdrawal or Removal of the General
Partner. |
166
|
|
|
Action |
|
Unitholder Approval Required |
|
|
|
|
Transfer of the general partner interest in us
|
|
Our general partner may transfer all, but not less than all, of
its general partner interest in us without a vote of our
unitholders to an affiliate or another person in connection with
its merger or consolidation with or into, or sale of all or
substantially all of its assets to such person. The approval of
a majority of the common units, excluding common units held by
the general partner and its affiliates, is required in other
circumstances for a transfer of the general partner interest to
a third party prior to March 31, 2015. Please read
Transfer of General Partner Interest. |
|
Transfer of incentive distribution rights
|
|
Except for transfers to an affiliate or another person as part
of the general partners merger or consolidation with or
into, or sale of all or substantially all of its assets to such
person, the approval of a majority of the common units,
excluding common units held by our general partner and its
affiliates, voting separately as a class, is required in most
circumstances for a transfer of the incentive distribution
rights to a third party prior to March 31, 2015. Please
read Transfer of Incentive Distribution
Rights. |
|
Transfer of ownership interests in the general partner
|
|
No approval required at any time. Please read
Transfer of Ownership Interests in General
Partner. |
Limited Liability
Assuming that a limited partner does not participate in the
control of our business within the meaning of the Marshall
Islands Act and that he otherwise acts in conformity with the
provisions of our partnership agreement, his liability under the
Marshall Islands Act will be limited, subject to possible
exceptions, to the amount of capital he is obligated to
contribute to us for his common units plus his share of any
undistributed profits and assets. If it were determined,
however, that the right, or exercise of the right, by the
limited partners as a group:
|
|
|
|
|
to remove or replace our general partner; |
|
|
|
to approve some amendments to our partnership agreement, or |
|
|
|
to take other action under our partnership agreement; |
constituted participation in the control of our
business for the purposes of the Marshall Islands Act, then the
limited partners could be held personally liable for our
obligations under the laws of Marshall Islands, to the same
extent as our general partner. This liability would extend to
persons who transact business with us who reasonably believe
that the limited partner is a general partner. Neither our
partnership agreement nor the Marshall Islands Act specifically
provides for legal recourse against our general partner if a
limited partner were to lose limited liability through any fault
of our general partner. While this does not mean that a limited
partner could not seek legal recourse, we know of no precedent
for this type of a claim in Marshall Islands case law.
167
Under the Marshall Islands Act, a limited partnership may not
make a distribution to a partner if, after the distribution, all
liabilities of the limited partnership, other than liabilities
to partners on account of their partnership interests and
liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to
specific property of the partnership, would exceed the fair
value of the assets of the limited partnership. For the purpose
of determining the fair value of the assets of a limited
partnership, the Marshall Islands Act provides that the fair
value of property subject to liability for which recourse of
creditors is limited shall be included in the assets of the
limited partnership only to the extent that the fair value of
that property exceeds the nonrecourse liability. The Marshall
Islands Act provides that a limited partner who receives a
distribution and knew at the time of the distribution that the
distribution was in violation of the Marshall Islands Act shall
be liable to the limited partnership for the amount of the
distribution for three years. Under the Marshall Islands Act, an
assignee who becomes a substituted limited partner of a limited
partnership is liable for the obligations of his assignor to
make contributions to the partnership, except the assignee is
not obligated for liabilities unknown to him at the time he
became a limited partner and that could not be ascertained from
the partnership agreement.
Maintenance of our limited liability may require compliance with
legal requirements in the jurisdictions in which the operating
company and its subsidiaries conduct business, which may include
qualifying to do business in those jurisdictions.
Limitations on the liability of limited partners for the
obligations of a limited partner have not been clearly
established in many jurisdictions. If, by virtue of our
membership interest in the operating company or otherwise, it
were determined that we were conducting business in any
jurisdiction without compliance with the applicable limited
partnership or limited liability company statute, or that the
right or exercise of the right by the limited partners as a
group to remove or replace the general partner, to approve some
amendments to the partnership agreement, or to take other action
under the partnership agreement constituted participation
in the control of our business for purposes of the
statutes of any relevant jurisdiction, then the limited partners
could be held personally liable for our obligations under the
law of that jurisdiction to the same extent as the general
partner under the circumstances. We will operate in a manner
that the general partner considers reasonable and necessary or
appropriate to preserve the limited liability of the limited
partners.
Issuance of Additional Securities
The partnership agreement authorizes us to issue an unlimited
number of additional partnership securities and rights to buy
partnership securities for the consideration and on the terms
and conditions determined by the general partner without the
approval of the unitholders.
It is possible that we will fund acquisitions through the
issuance of additional common units or other equity securities.
Holders of any additional common units we issue will be entitled
to share equally with the then-existing holders of common units
in our distributions of available cash. In addition, the
issuance of additional common units or other equity securities
interests may dilute the value of the interests of the
then-existing holders of common units in our net assets.
In accordance with Marshall Islands law and the provisions of
our partnership agreement, we may also issue additional
partnership securities interests that, as determined by the
general partner, have special voting rights to which the common
units are not entitled.
Upon issuance of additional partnership securities other than
upon any exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option, our general partner will be required to make additional
capital contributions to the extent necessary to maintain its 2%
general partner interest in us. Moreover, our general partner
and its affiliates will have the right, which it may from time
to time assign in whole or in part to any of its affiliates, to
purchase common units, subordinated units or other equity
securities whenever, and on the same terms that, we issue those
securities to persons other than our general partner and its
affiliates, to the extent necessary to maintain its and its
affiliates percentage interest, including its interest
represented by common units and subordinated units, that existed
immediately prior to each issuance. Other holders of
168
common units will not have similar preemptive rights to acquire
additional common units or other partnership securities.
Amendment of the Partnership Agreement
Amendments to our partnership agreement may be proposed only by
or with the consent of our general partner. However, our general
partner will have no duty or obligation to propose any amendment
and may decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or
obligation whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including
any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us or
the limited partners. In order to adopt a proposed amendment,
other than the amendments discussed below, our general partner
must seek written approval of the holders of the number of units
required to approve the amendment or call a meeting of the
limited partners to consider and vote upon the proposed
amendment. Except as we describe below, an amendment must be
approved by a unit majority.
No amendment may be made that would:
|
|
|
(1) increase the obligations of any limited partner without
its consent, unless approved by at least a majority of the type
or class of limited partner interests so affected; |
|
|
(2) increase the obligations of, restrict in any way any
action by or rights of, or reduce in any way the amounts
distributable, reimbursable or otherwise payable by us to the
general partner or any of its affiliates without the consent of
the general partner, which may be given or withheld at its
option; |
|
|
(3) change the term of our partnership; |
|
|
(4) provide that our partnership is not dissolved upon an
election to dissolve our partnership by our general partner that
is approved by the holders of a unit majority; or |
|
|
(5) give any person the right to dissolve our partnership
other than our general partners right to dissolve our
partnership with the approval of the holders of a unit majority. |
The provision of our partnership agreement preventing the
amendments having the effects described in clauses
(1) through (5) above can be amended upon the approval
of the holders of at least 90% of the outstanding units voting
together as a single class (including units owned by our general
partner and its affiliates). Upon completion of this offering,
the owner of our general partner will own 79.6% of the
outstanding units.
|
|
|
Our general partner may generally make amendments to our
partnership agreement without the approval of any limited
partner or assignee to reflect: |
|
|
(1) a change in our name, the location of our principal
place of business, our registered agent or our registered office; |
|
|
(2) the admission, substitution, withdrawal or removal of
partners in accordance with our partnership agreement; |
|
|
(3) a change that our general partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate for us to qualify or to continue our
qualification as a limited partnership or a partnership in which
the limited partners have limited liability under the laws of
any jurisdiction or to ensure that neither we, the operating
company, nor its subsidiaries will be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation or otherwise taxed as an entity for
federal income tax purposes; |
169
|
|
|
(4) an amendment that is necessary, upon the advice of our
counsel, to prevent us or our general partner or its directors,
officers, agents, or trustees from in any manner being subjected
to the provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the
Investment Advisors Act of 1940, or plan asset regulations
adopted under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, or ERISA, whether or not substantially similar to plan
asset regulations currently applied or proposed; |
|
|
(5) an amendment that the general partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate for the authorization of additional
partnership securities or rights to acquire partnership
securities; |
|
|
(6) any amendment expressly permitted in the partnership
agreement to be made by the general partner acting alone; |
|
|
(7) an amendment effected, necessitated, or contemplated by
a merger agreement that has been approved under the terms of the
partnership agreement; |
|
|
(8) any amendment that the general partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate for the formation by us of, or our
investment in, any corporation, partnership or other entity, as
otherwise permitted by the partnership agreement; |
|
|
(9) a change in our fiscal year or taxable year and related
changes; |
|
|
(10) certain mergers or conveyances as set forth in our
partnership agreement; or |
|
|
(11) any other amendments substantially similar to any of
the matters described in (1) through (10) above. |
In addition, our general partner may make amendments to the
partnership agreement without the approval of any limited
partner or assignee if the general partner determines that those
amendments:
|
|
|
(1) do not adversely affect the limited partners (or any
particular class of limited partners) in any material respect; |
|
|
(2) are necessary or appropriate to satisfy any
requirements, conditions, or guidelines contained in any
opinion, directive, order, ruling or regulation of any federal
or state agency or judicial authority or contained in any
federal or state statute; |
|
|
(3) are necessary or appropriate to facilitate the trading
of limited partner interests or to comply with any rule,
regulation, guideline or requirement of any securities exchange
on which the limited partner interests are or will be listed for
trading; |
|
|
(4) are necessary or appropriate for any action taken by
the general partner relating to splits or combinations of units
under the provisions of the partnership agreement; or |
|
|
(5) are required to effect the intent expressed in this
prospectus or the intent of the provisions of the partnership
agreement or are otherwise contemplated by the partnership
agreement. |
|
|
|
Opinion of Counsel and Unitholder Approval |
Our general partner will not be required to obtain an opinion of
counsel that an amendment will not result in a loss of limited
liability to the limited partners or result in our being treated
as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes if one of
the amendments described above under No
Unitholder Approval should occur. No other amendments to
our partnership agreement will become effective without the
approval of holders of at least 90% of the outstanding units
voting as a single class unless we obtain an opinion of counsel
to the effect that the amendment will not affect the limited
liability under applicable law of any of our limited partners.
In addition to the above restrictions, any amendment that would
have a material adverse effect on the rights or privileges of
any type or class of outstanding units in relation to other
classes of units will require the approval of at least a
majority of the type or class of units so affected. Any
amendment that reduces the voting percentage required to take
any action must be approved by the affirmative vote of limited
170
partners whose aggregate outstanding units constitute not less
than the voting requirement sought to be reduced.
Action Relating to the Operating Company
Without the approval of the holders or units representing a unit
majority, our general partner is prohibited from consenting on
our behalf, as the sole member of the operating company, to any
amendment to the limited liability company agreement of the
operating company or taking any action on our behalf permitted
to be taken by a limited partner of the operating company in
each case that would adversely affect our limited partners (or
any particular class of limited partners) in any material
respect.
Merger, Sale, or Other Disposition of Assets
A merger or consolidation of us requires the consent of our
general partner. However, our general partner will have no duty
or obligation to consent to any merger or consolidation and may
decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or obligation
whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including any duty to
act in good faith or in the best interests of us or the limited
partners. In addition, our partnership agreement generally
prohibits our general partner, without the prior approval of the
holders of units representing a unit majority, from causing us
to, among other things, sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of
all or substantially all of our assets in a single transaction
or a series of related transactions, including by way of merger,
consolidation, or other combination, or approving on our behalf
the sale, exchange, or other disposition of all or substantially
all of the assets of our subsidiaries. Our general partner may,
however, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate, or grant a security
interest in all or substantially all of our assets without that
approval. Our general partner may also sell all or substantially
all of our assets under a foreclosure or other realization upon
those encumbrances without that approval.
If conditions specified in our partnership agreement are
satisfied, our general partner may convert us or any of our
subsidiaries into a new limited liability entity or merge us or
any of our subsidiaries into, or convey some or all of our
assets to, a newly formed entity if the sole purpose of that
merger or conveyance is to effect a mere change in our legal
form into another limited liability entity. The unitholders are
not entitled to dissenters rights of appraisal under our
partnership agreement or applicable law in the event of a
conversion, merger or consolidation, a sale of substantially all
of our assets, or any other transaction or event.
Termination and Dissolution
We will continue as a limited partnership until terminated under
our partnership agreement. We will dissolve upon:
|
|
|
(1) the election of our general partner to dissolve us, if
approved by the holders of units representing a unit majority; |
|
|
(2) the sale, exchange, or other disposition of all or
substantially all of our assets and properties and our
subsidiaries; |
|
|
(3) the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of us; or |
|
|
(4) the withdrawal or removal of our general partner or any
other event that results in its ceasing to be the general
partner other than by reason of a transfer of its general
partner interest in accordance with the partnership agreement or
withdrawal or removal following approval and admission of a
successor. |
Upon a dissolution under clause (4), the holders of a unit
majority may also elect, within specific time limitations, to
continue our business on the same terms and conditions described
in the partnership
171
agreement by appointing as general partner an entity approved by
the holders of units representing a unit majority, subject to
our receipt of an opinion of counsel to the effect that:
|
|
|
(1) the action would not result in the loss of limited
liability of any limited partner; and |
|
|
(2) none of our partnership or the operating company nor
any of our other subsidiaries would be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation or otherwise be taxable as an entity
for federal income tax purposes upon the exercise of that right
to continue. |
Liquidation and Distribution of Proceeds
Upon our dissolution, unless we are continued as a new limited
partnership, the liquidator authorized to wind up our affairs
will, acting with all of the powers of the general partner that
are necessary or appropriate, liquidate our assets and apply the
proceeds of the liquidation as provided in Cash
Distribution Policy Distributions of Cash Upon
Liquidation. The liquidator may defer liquidation or
distribution of our assets for a reasonable period or distribute
assets to partners in kind if it determines that a sale would be
impractical or would cause undue loss to our partners.
Withdrawal or Removal of the General Partner
Except as described below, our general partner has agreed not to
withdraw voluntarily as our general partner prior to
March 31, 2015 without obtaining the approval of the
holders of at least a majority of the outstanding common units,
excluding common units held by the general partner and its
affiliates, and furnishing an opinion of counsel regarding
limited liability and tax matters. On or after March 31,
2015, our general partner may withdraw as general partner
without first obtaining approval of any unitholder by giving
90 days written notice, and that withdrawal will not
constitute a violation of the partnership agreement.
Notwithstanding the information above, our general partner may
withdraw without unitholder approval upon 90 days
notice to the limited partners if at least 50% of the
outstanding common units are held or controlled by one person
and its affiliates other than the general partner and its
affiliates. In addition, the partnership agreement permits our
general partner in some instances to sell or otherwise transfer
all of its general partner interest in us without the approval
of the unitholders. Please read Transfer of
General Partner Interests and Transfer
of Incentive Distribution Rights.
Upon withdrawal of our general partner under any circumstances,
other than as a result of a transfer by the general partner of
all or a part of its general partner interest in us, the holders
of a majority of the outstanding common units and subordinated
units, voting as separate classes, may select a successor to
that withdrawing general partner. If a successor is not elected,
or is elected but an opinion of counsel regarding limited
liability and tax matters cannot be obtained, we will be
dissolved, wound up and liquidated, unless within a specified
period of time after that withdrawal, the holders of a unit
majority agree in writing to continue our business and to
appoint a successor general partner. Please read
Termination and Dissolution.
Our general partner may not be removed unless that removal is
approved by the vote of the holders of not less than
662/3%
of the outstanding units, voting together as a single class,
including units held by the general partner and its affiliates,
and we receive an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability
and tax matters. Any removal of our general partner is also
subject to the approval of a successor general partner by the
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding common
units and subordinated units, voting as separate classes. The
ownership of more than
331/3%
of the outstanding units by our general partner and its
affiliates would give them the practical ability to prevent the
general partners removal. At the closing of this offering,
our general partner and its affiliates will own 79.6% of the
outstanding units.
Our partnership agreement also provides that if our general
partner is removed as our general partner under circumstances
where cause does not exist and units held by the general partner
and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that removal:
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and all outstanding
subordinated units will immediately convert into common units on
a one-for-one basis; |
172
|
|
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and |
|
|
|
the general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner interest and its incentive distribution rights into
common units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests
based on the fair market value of the interests at the time. |
In the event of removal of the general partner under
circumstances where cause exists or withdrawal of the general
partner where that withdrawal violates the partnership
agreement, a successor general partner will have the option to
purchase the general partner interest and incentive distribution
rights of the departing general partner for a cash payment equal
to the fair market value of those interests. Under all other
circumstances where the general partner withdraws or is removed
by the limited partners, the departing general partner will have
the option to require the successor general partner to purchase
the general partner interest of the departing general partner
and its incentive distribution rights for their fair market
value. In each case, this fair market value will be determined
by agreement between the departing general partner and the
successor general partner. If no agreement is reached, an
independent investment banking firm or other independent expert
selected by the departing general partner and the successor
general partner will determine the fair market value. Or, if the
departing general partner and the successor general partner
cannot agree upon an expert, then an expert chosen by agreement
of the experts selected by each of them will determine the fair
market value.
If the option described above is not exercised by either the
departing general partner or the successor general partner, the
departing general partners general partner interest and
its incentive distribution rights will automatically convert
into common units equal to the fair market value of those
interests as determined by an investment banking firm or other
independent expert selected in the manner described in the
preceding paragraph.
In addition, we will be required to reimburse the departing
general partner for all amounts due the departing general
partner, including, without limitation, any employee-related
liabilities, including severance liabilities, incurred for the
termination of any employees employed by the departing general
partner or its affiliates for our benefit.
Transfer of General Partner Interest
Except for the transfer by our general partner of all, but not
less than all, of its general partner interest in us to:
|
|
|
|
|
an affiliate of the general partner (other than an individual),
or |
|
|
|
another entity as part of the merger or consolidation of our
general partner with or into another entity or the transfer by
the general partner of all or substantially all of its assets to
another entity, |
our general partner may not transfer all or any part of its
general partner interest in us to another person prior to
March 31, 2015 without the approval of the holders of at
least a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding
common units held by the general partner and its affiliates. As
a condition of this transfer, the transferee must, among other
things, assume the rights and duties of the general partner,
agree to be bound by the provisions of the partnership agreement
and furnish an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability
and tax matters.
Our general partner and its affiliates may at any time transfer
units to one or more persons, without unitholder approval,
except that they may not transfer subordinated units to us.
Transfer of Ownership Interests in General Partner
At any time, the members of our general partner may sell or
transfer all or part of their respective membership interests in
our general partner to an affiliate or a third party without the
approval of our unitholders.
173
Transfer of Incentive Distribution Rights
Our general partner or its affiliates or a subsequent holder may
transfer its incentive distribution rights to an affiliate of
the holder (other than an individual) or another entity as part
of the merger or consolidation of such holder with or into
another entity, or sale of all or substantially all of its
assets to that entity without the prior approval of the
unitholders. Prior to March 31, 2015, other transfers of
the incentive distribution rights will require the affirmative
vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding common units,
excluding common units held by the general partner and its
affiliates. On or after March 31, 2015, the incentive
distribution rights will be freely transferable.
Change of Management Provisions
The partnership agreement contains specific provisions that are
intended to discourage a person or group from attempting to
remove Teekay GP L.L.C. as our general partner or otherwise
change management. If any person or group other than the general
partner and its affiliates acquires beneficial ownership of 20%
or more of any class of units, that person or group loses voting
rights on all of its units. This loss of voting rights does not
apply to any person or group that acquires the units from our
general partner or its affiliates and any transferees of that
person or group approved by our general partner or to any person
or group who acquires the units with the prior approval of the
board of directors of the general partner.
The partnership agreement also provides that if the general
partner is removed under circumstances where cause does not
exist and units held by the general partner and its affiliates
are not voted in favor of that removal:
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and all outstanding
subordinated units will immediately convert into common units on
a one-for-one basis; |
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and |
|
|
|
the general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner interest and its incentive distribution rights into
common units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests. |
Limited Call Right
If at any time the general partner and its affiliates hold more
than 80% of the then-issued and outstanding partnership
securities of any class, the general partner will have the
right, which it may assign in whole or in part to any of its
affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of
the remaining partnership securities of the class held by
unaffiliated persons as of a record date to be selected by the
general partner, on at least ten but not more than
60 days notice. The purchase price in this event is
the greater of: (1) the highest cash price paid by either
of the general partner or any of its affiliates for any
partnership securities of the class purchased within the
90 days preceding the date on which the general partner
first mails notice of its election to purchase those partnership
securities; and (2) the current market price as of the date
three days before the date the notice is mailed.
As a result of the general partners right to purchase
outstanding partnership securities, a holder of partnership
securities may have the holders partnership securities
purchased at an undesirable time or price. The tax consequences
to a unitholder of the exercise of this call right are the same
as a sale by that unitholder of common units in the market.
Please read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Disposition of Common Units.
At the completion of this offering and assuming no exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option, Teekay Shipping
Corporation, an affiliate of our general partner, will own
approximately 59.3% of the common units. At the end of the
subordination period, assuming no additional issuances of common
units, no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option and conversion of our subordinated units into common
units, Teekay Shipping Corporation will own approximately 79.6%
of the common units. Teekay
174
Shipping Corporation will also be able to acquire additional
common units if, in connection with the sale to us of its
interest in three RasGas II LNG newbuilding carriers, it
elects to receive common units in satisfaction of the
$124.5 million cash purchase price for those vessels.
Accordingly, after subordinated units are converted to common
units, our general partner and its affiliates may own a
sufficient percentage of our common units to enable our general
partner to exercise its limited call right.
Meetings; Voting
Except as described below regarding a person or group owning 20%
or more of any class of units then outstanding, unitholders or
assignees who are record holders of units on the record date
will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, meetings of our
limited partners and to act upon matters for which approvals may
be solicited. Common units that are owned by an assignee who is
a record holder, but who has not yet been admitted as a limited
partner, will be voted by the general partner at the written
direction of the record holder. Absent direction of this kind,
the common units will not be voted, except that, in the case of
common units held by the general partner on behalf of
unpermitted citizen assignees, the general partner will
distribute the votes on those common units in the same ratios as
the votes of limited partners on other units are cast.
The general partner does not anticipate that any meeting of
unitholders will be called in the foreseeable future. Any action
that is required or permitted to be taken by the unitholders may
be taken either at a meeting of the unitholders or without a
meeting if consents in writing describing the action so taken
are signed by holders of the number of units necessary to
authorize or take that action at a meeting. Meetings of the
unitholders may be called by the general partner or by
unitholders owning at least 20% of the outstanding units of the
class for which a meeting is proposed. Unitholders may vote
either in person or by proxy at meetings. The holders of a
majority of the outstanding units of the class or classes for
which a meeting has been called, represented in person or by
proxy, will constitute a quorum unless any action by the
unitholders requires approval by holders of a greater percentage
of the units, in which case the quorum will be the greater
percentage.
Each record holder of a unit may vote according to the
holders percentage interest in us, although additional
limited partner interests having special voting rights could be
issued. Please read Issuance of Additional
Securities. However, if at any time any person or group,
other than the general partner and its affiliates, or a direct
or subsequently approved transferee of the general partner or
its affiliates or a transferee approved by the board of
directors of the general partner, acquires, in the aggregate,
beneficial ownership of 20% or more of any class of units then
outstanding, that person or group will lose voting rights on all
of its units and the units may not be voted on any matter and
will not be considered to be outstanding when sending notices of
a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes,
determining the presence of a quorum, or for other similar
purposes. Common units held in nominee or street name account
will be voted by the broker or other nominee in accordance with
the instruction of the beneficial owner unless the arrangement
between the beneficial owner and his nominee provides otherwise.
Except as the partnership agreement otherwise provides,
subordinated units will vote together with common units as a
single class.
Any notice, demand, request report, or proxy material required
or permitted to be given or made to record holders of common
units under the partnership agreement will be delivered to the
record holder by us or by the transfer agent.
Status as Limited Partner or Assignee
Except as described above under Limited
Liability, the common units will be fully paid, and
unitholders will not be required to make additional
contributions.
An assignee of a common unit, after executing and delivering a
transfer application, but pending its admission as a substituted
limited partner, is entitled to an interest equivalent to that
of a limited partner for the right to share in allocations and
distributions from us, including liquidating distributions. The
general partner will vote and exercise other powers attributable
to common units owned by an assignee
175
that has not become a substitute limited partner at the written
direction of the assignee. Please read
Meetings; Voting. Transferees that do
not execute and deliver a transfer application will not be
treated as assignees or as record holders of common units, and
will not receive cash distributions, federal income tax
allocations or reports furnished to holders of common units.
Please read Description of the Common Units
Transfer of Common Units.
Indemnification
Under the partnership agreement, in most circumstances, we will
indemnify the following persons, to the fullest extent permitted
by law, from and against all losses, claims, damages or similar
events:
|
|
|
(1) our general partner; |
|
|
(2) any departing general partner; |
|
|
(3) any person who is or was an affiliate of our general
partner or any departing general partner; |
|
|
(4) any person who is or was an officer, director, member
or partner of any entity described in (1), (2) or
(3) above; |
|
|
(5) any person who is or was serving as a director,
officer, member, partner, fiduciary or trustee of another person
at the request of our general partner or any departing general
partner; or |
|
|
(6) any person designated by our general partner. |
Any indemnification under these provisions will only be out of
our assets. Unless it otherwise agrees, the general partner will
not be personally liable for, or have any obligation to
contribute or lend funds or assets to us to enable us to
effectuate, indemnification. We may purchase insurance against
liabilities asserted against and expenses incurred by persons
for our activities, regardless of whether we would have the
power to indemnify the person against liabilities under the
partnership agreement.
Books and Reports
The general partner is required to keep appropriate books of our
business at our principal offices. The books will be maintained
for both tax and financial reporting purposes on an accrual
basis. For tax and fiscal reporting purposes, our fiscal year is
the calendar year.
We will furnish or make available to record holders of common
units, within 120 days after the close of each fiscal year,
an annual report containing audited financial statements and a
report on those financial statements by our independent
chartered accountants. Except for our fourth quarter, we will
also furnish or make available summary financial information
within 90 days after the close of each quarter.
We will furnish each record holder of a unit with information
reasonably required for U.S. tax reporting purposes within
90 days after the close of each calendar year. This
information is expected to be furnished in summary form so that
some complex calculations normally required of partners can be
avoided. Our ability to furnish this summary information to
unitholders will depend on the cooperation of unitholders in
supplying us with specific information. Every unitholder will
receive information to assist the unitholder in determining the
unitholders U.S. federal and state tax liability and
filing obligations, regardless of whether he supplies us with
information.
Right to Inspect Our Books and Records
The partnership agreement provides that a limited partner can,
for a purpose reasonably related to his interest as a limited
partner, upon reasonable demand and at the limited
partners own expense, have furnished to the limited
partner:
|
|
|
(1) a current list of the name and last known address of
each partner; |
|
|
(2) a copy of our tax returns; |
176
|
|
|
(3) information as to the amount of cash, and a description
and statement of the agreed value of any other property or
services, contributed or to be contributed by each partner and
the date on which each became a partner; |
|
|
(4) copies of the partnership agreement, the certificate of
limited partnership of the partnership, related amendments and
powers of attorney under which they have been executed; |
|
|
(5) information regarding the status of our business and
financial condition; and |
|
|
(6) any other information regarding our affairs as is just
and reasonable. |
The general partner may, and intends to, keep confidential from
the limited partners trade secrets or other information the
disclosure of which the general partner believes in good faith
is not in our best interests or that we are required by law or
by agreements with third parties to keep confidential.
Registration Rights
Under the partnership agreement, we have agreed to register for
resale under the Securities Act of 1933 and applicable state
securities laws any common units, subordinated units or other
partnership securities proposed to be sold by the general
partner or any of its affiliates or their assignees if an
exemption from the registration requirements is not otherwise
available or advisable. These registration rights continue for
two years following any withdrawal or removal of Teekay GP
L.L.C. as our general partner. We are obligated to pay all
expenses incidental to the registration, excluding underwriting
discounts and commissions. Please read Units Eligible for
Future Sale.
177
UNITS ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
After the sale of the common units offered by this prospectus,
our general partner and its affiliates will hold an aggregate of
8,734,572 common units and 14,734,572 subordinated
units. All of the subordinated units will convert into common
units at the end of the subordination period, and some may
convert earlier. The sale of these common and subordinated units
could have an adverse impact on the price of the common units or
on any trading market that may develop.
The common units sold in this offering will generally be freely
transferable without restriction or further registration under
the Securities Act of 1933. However, any common units held by an
affiliate of ours may not be resold publicly except
in compliance with the registration requirements of the
Securities Act or under an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 144 or
otherwise. Rule 144 permits securities acquired by an
affiliate of ours to be sold into the market in an amount that
does not exceed, during any three-month period, the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the total number of the class of securities outstanding; or |
|
|
|
the average weekly reported trading volume of the common units
for the four calendar weeks prior to the sale. |
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to specific manner of
sale provisions, holding period requirements, notice
requirements and the availability of current public information
about us. A person who is not deemed to have been an affiliate
of ours at any time during the three months preceding a sale,
and who has beneficially owned common units for at least two
years, would be entitled to sell those common units under
Rule 144 without regard to the current public information
requirements, volume limitations, manner of sale provisions, and
notice requirements of Rule 144.
The partnership agreement provides that we may issue an
unlimited number of limited partner interests of any type
without a vote of the unitholders. Any issuance of additional
common units or other equity securities would result in a
corresponding decrease in the proportionate ownership interest
in us represented by, and could adversely affect the cash
distributions to and market price of, common units then
outstanding. Please read The Partnership
Agreement Issuance of Additional Securities.
Under the partnership agreement, our general partner and its
affiliates have the right to cause us to register under the
Securities Act and applicable state securities laws the offer
and sale of any units that they hold. Subject to the terms and
conditions of the partnership agreement, these registration
rights allow our general partner and its affiliates or their
assignees holding any units to require registration of any of
these units and to include any of these units in a registration
by us of other units, including units offered by us or by any
unitholder. Our general partner will continue to have these
registration rights for two years following its withdrawal or
removal as our general partner. In connection with any
registration of this kind, we will indemnify each unitholder
participating in the registration and its officers, directors
and controlling persons from and against any liabilities under
the Securities Act or any applicable state securities laws
arising from the registration statement or prospectus. We will
bear all costs and expenses incidental to any registration,
excluding any underwriting discounts and commissions. Except as
described below, our general partner and its affiliates may sell
their units in private transactions at any time, subject to
compliance with applicable laws.
We, our subsidiaries, our general partner and its affiliates,
including the directors and executive officers of our general
partner, Teekay Shipping Corporation and the participants in our
directed unit program, have agreed not to sell any common units
for a period of 180 days (or 90 days for non-officer
or director participants in our directed unit program) from the
date of this prospectus, subject to certain exceptions. Please
read Underwriting for a description of these lock-up
provisions.
178
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
This section is a discussion of the material U.S. federal
income tax considerations that may be relevant to prospective
unitholders who are individual citizens or residents of the
United States and, unless otherwise noted in the following
discussion, is the opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.,
counsel to the general partner and us, insofar as it relates to
matters of U.S. federal income tax law and legal conclusions
with respect to those matters. This section is based upon
provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (or
the Internal Revenue Code) as in effect on the date of
this prospectus, existing final, temporary and proposed
regulations thereunder (or Treasury Regulations) and
current administrative rulings and court decisions, all of which
are subject to change. Changes in these authorities may cause
the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences
described below. Unless the context otherwise requires,
references in this section to we, our or
us are references to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. and
its direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries that have
properly elected to be disregarded as entities separate from
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. for U.S. federal tax purposes.
The following discussion does not comment on all U.S. federal
income tax matters affecting us or the unitholders. Moreover,
the discussion focuses on unitholders who are individual
citizens or residents of the United States and hold their units
as capital assets and has only limited application to
corporations, estates, trusts, non-U.S. persons or other
unitholders subject to specialized tax treatment, such as
tax-exempt entities (including IRAs), regulated investment
companies (mutual funds) and real estate investment trusts (or
REITs). Accordingly, we urge each prospective unitholder
to consult, and depend on, his own tax advisor in analyzing the
U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax
consequences particular to him of the ownership or disposition
of common units.
All statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions, but
not as to factual matters, contained in this section, unless
otherwise noted, are the opinion of Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. and are based on the accuracy of the representations made
by us to Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. for purposes of their
opinion.
Except as described below under Classification
as a Partnership, no ruling has been or will be requested
from the IRS regarding any matter affecting us or prospective
unitholders. Instead, we will rely on opinions of
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. Unlike a ruling, an opinion of
counsel represents only that counsels best legal judgment
and does not bind the IRS or the courts. Accordingly, the
opinions and statements made here may not be sustained by a
court if contested by the IRS. Any contest of this sort with the
IRS may materially and adversely impact the market for the
common units and the prices at which common units trade. In
addition, the costs of any contest with the IRS, principally
legal, accounting and related fees, will result in a reduction
in cash available for distribution to our unitholders and our
general partner and thus will be borne indirectly by our
unitholders and our general partner. Furthermore, our tax
treatment, or the tax treatment of an investment in us, may be
significantly modified by future legislative or administrative
changes or court decisions. Any modifications may or may not be
retroactively applied.
For the reasons described below, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
has not rendered an opinion with respect to the following
specific U.S. federal income tax issues: (1) the treatment
of a unitholder whose common units are loaned to a short seller
to cover a short sale of common units (please read
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Treatment of Short Sales); (2) whether our method for
depreciating Section 743 adjustments is sustainable in
certain cases (please read Consequences of
Unit Ownership Section 754 Election); and
(3) whether our monthly convention for allocating taxable
income and losses is permitted by existing Treasury Regulations
(please read Disposition of Common
Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees). Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has not
rendered an opinion on any state, local or non-U.S. tax
matters.
Classification as a Partnership
For purposes of U.S. federal income taxes, a partnership is not
a taxable entity, and although it may be subject to withholding
taxes on behalf of its partners under certain circumstances, a
partnership itself incurs no U.S. federal income tax
liability. Instead, each partner of a partnership is required to
take into account his share of items of income, gain, loss,
deduction and credit of the partnership in computing his
179
U.S. federal income tax liability, regardless of whether
cash distributions are made to him by the partnership.
Distributions by a partnership to a partner generally are not
taxable unless the amount of cash distributed is in excess of
the partners adjusted tax basis in his partnership
interest.
Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that
publicly traded partnerships will, as a general rule, be treated
as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
However, an exception, referred to as the Qualifying
Income Exception, exists with respect to publicly traded
partnerships whose qualifying income represents 90%
or more of their gross income for every taxable year. Qualifying
income includes income and gains derived from the transportation
and storage of crude oil, natural gas and products thereof,
including liquefied natural gas. Other types of qualifying
income include interest (other than from a financial business),
dividends, gains from the sale of real property and gains from
the sale or other disposition of capital assets held for the
production of qualifying income, including stock. We estimate
that less than 20% of our current income is not qualifying
income; however, this estimate could change from time to time.
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is of the opinion that, based
upon the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations thereunder,
published revenue rulings and court decisions and the
representations described below, it is more likely than not we
will be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes.
In rendering its opinion, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has
relied on factual representations made by us and the general
partner. The representations made by us and our general partner
upon which Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has relied are:
|
|
|
|
|
We have not elected and will not elect to be treated as a
corporation, and each of our direct or indirect wholly-owned
subsidiaries has properly elected to be disregarded as an entity
separate from us, for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and |
|
|
|
For each taxable year, at least 90% of our gross income is of a
type that Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has opined or will
opine is more likely than not qualifying income
within the meaning of Section 7704(d) of the Internal
Revenue Code. |
Because of the lack of certainty as to our treatment, we are
seeking a ruling from the IRS as to whether our operations
generate qualifying income under Section 7704
of the Internal Revenue Code. There is meaningful risk that we
will not receive a favorable ruling in this regard.
The discussion that follows is based on the assumption that we
will be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. Please read Possible Classification
as a Corporation below for a discussion of the
consequences of our failing to be treated as a partnership for
such purposes.
Status as a Partner
The treatment described herein as applicable to unitholders
applies only to unitholders treated as partners in us for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. Unitholders who have been properly
admitted as limited partners of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. will be
treated as partners in us for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. Also:
|
|
|
|
|
assignees of common units who have executed and delivered
transfer applications, and are awaiting admission as limited
partners and |
|
|
|
unitholders whose common units are held in street name or by a
nominee and who have the right to direct the nominee in the
exercise of all substantive rights attendant to the ownership of
their common units |
will be treated as partners in us for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
Because there is no direct authority addressing assignees of
common units who are entitled to execute and deliver transfer
applications and thereby become entitled to direct the exercise
of attendant rights, but who fail to execute and deliver
transfer applications, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.s
opinion does not extend to these persons. Furthermore, a
purchaser or other transferee of common units who does not
execute and
180
deliver a transfer application may not receive some federal
income tax information or reports furnished to record holders of
common units unless the common units are held in a nominee or
street name account and the nominee or broker has executed and
delivered a transfer application for those common units.
Under certain circumstances, a beneficial owner of common units
whose units have been loaned to another may lose his status as a
partner with respect to those units for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. Please read Consequences of Unit
Ownership Treatment of Short Sales.
In general, a person who is not a partner in a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes is not required or
permitted to report any share of the partnerships income,
gain, deductions or losses for such purposes, and any cash
distributions received by such a person from the partnership
therefore may be fully taxable as ordinary income. Unitholders
not described here are urged to consult their own tax advisors
with respect to their status as partners in us for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Flow-through of Taxable Income. Each unitholder
will be required to include in income his allocable share of our
income, gains, losses and deductions for our taxable year ending
with or within his taxable year, without regard to whether we
make corresponding cash distributions to him. Our taxable year
ends on December 31. Consequently, we may allocate income
to a unitholder as of December 31 of a given year, and the
unitholder will be required to report such income on his tax
return for his tax year that ends on or includes such date, even
if he has not received a cash distribution from us as of such
date.
Treatment of Distributions. Distributions by us to
a unitholder generally will not be taxable to the unitholder for
U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of his tax
basis in his common units immediately before the distribution.
Our cash distributions in excess of a unitholders tax
basis generally will be considered to be gain from the sale or
exchange of the common units, taxable in accordance with the
rules described under Disposition of Common
Units below. Any reduction in a unitholders share of
our liabilities for which no partner, including the general
partner, bears the economic risk of loss, known as
nonrecourse liabilities, will be treated as a
distribution of cash to that unitholder. To the extent our
distributions cause a unitholders at risk
amount to be less than zero at the end of any taxable year, he
must recapture any losses deducted in previous years. Please
read Limitations on Deductibility of
Losses.
A decrease in a unitholders percentage interest in us
because of our issuance of additional common units will decrease
his share of our nonrecourse liabilities, and thus will result
in a corresponding deemed distribution of cash. A
non-pro rata distribution of money or property may result
in ordinary income to a unitholder, regardless of his tax basis
in his common units, if the distribution reduces the
unitholders share of our unrealized
receivables, including depreciation recapture, and/or
substantially appreciated inventory items, both as
defined in the Internal Revenue Code, and collectively,
Section 751 Assets. To that extent, he will be
treated as having been distributed his proportionate share of
the Section 751 Assets and having exchanged those assets
with us in return for the non-pro rata portion of the
actual distribution made to him. This latter deemed exchange
will generally result in the unitholders realization of
ordinary income, which will equal the excess of (1) the
non-pro rata portion of that distribution over (2) the
unitholders tax basis for the share of Section 751
Assets deemed relinquished in the exchange.
Ratio of Taxable Income to Distributions. We
estimate that a purchaser of common units in this offering who
owns those common units from the date of closing of this
offering through December 31, 2007, will be allocated an
amount of federal taxable income for that period that will be
20% or less of the cash distributed with respect to that period.
We anticipate that after the taxable year ending
December 31, 2007, the ratio of allocable taxable income to
cash distributions to the unitholders will increase. These
estimates are based upon the assumption that gross income from
operations will approximate the amount required to make the
minimum quarterly distribution on all units and other
assumptions with respect to capital expenditures, foreign
currency translation income, gains on foreign currency
transactions, cash flow and anticipated cash distributions.
These estimates and assumptions are subject to, among other
things, numerous business, economic, regulatory, competitive and
political uncertainties beyond our control.
181
Further, the estimates are based on current U.S. federal
income tax law and tax reporting positions that we will adopt
and with which the IRS could disagree. Accordingly, we cannot
assure you that these estimates will prove to be correct. The
actual percentage of distributions that will constitute taxable
income could be higher or lower, and any differences could be
material and could materially affect the value of the common
units.
Basis of Common Units. A unitholders initial
U.S. federal income tax basis for his common units will be
the amount he paid for the common units plus his share of our
nonrecourse liabilities. That basis will be increased by his
share of our income and by any increases in his share of our
nonrecourse liabilities. That basis will be decreased, but not
below zero, by distributions from us, by the unitholders
share of our losses, by any decreases in his share of our
nonrecourse liabilities and by his share of our expenditures
that are not deductible in computing taxable income and are not
required to be capitalized. A unitholder will have no share of
our debt that is recourse to the general partner, but will have
a share, generally based on his share of profits, of our
nonrecourse liabilities. Please read
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Limitations on Deductibility of Losses. The
deduction by a unitholder of his share of our losses will be
limited to the tax basis in his units and, in the case of an
individual unitholder or a corporate unitholder, if more than
50% of the value of the corporate unitholders stock is
owned directly or indirectly by five or fewer individuals or
some tax-exempt organizations, to the amount for which the
unitholder is considered to be at risk with
respect to our activities, if that is less than his tax basis. A
unitholder must recapture losses deducted in previous years to
the extent that distributions cause his at risk amount to be
less than zero at the end of any taxable year. Losses disallowed
to a unitholder or recaptured as a result of these limitations
will carry forward and will be allowable to the extent that his
tax basis or at risk amount, whichever is the limiting factor,
is subsequently increased. Upon the taxable disposition of a
unit, any gain recognized by a unitholder can be offset by
losses that were previously suspended by the at risk limitation
but may not be offset by losses suspended by the basis
limitation. Any excess suspended loss above that gain is no
longer utilizable.
In general, a unitholder will be at risk to the extent of the
tax basis of his units, excluding any portion of that basis
attributable to his share of our nonrecourse liabilities,
reduced by any amount of money he borrows to acquire or hold his
units, if the lender of those borrowed funds owns an interest in
us, is related to the unitholder or can look only to the units
for repayment. A unitholders at risk amount will increase
or decrease as the tax basis of the unitholders units
increases or decreases, other than tax basis increases or
decreases attributable to increases or decreases in his share of
our nonrecourse liabilities.
The passive loss limitations generally provide that individuals,
estates, trusts and some closely-held corporations and personal
service corporations can deduct losses from passive activities,
which generally are corporate or partnership activities in which
the taxpayer does not materially participate, only to the extent
of the taxpayers income from those passive activities. The
passive loss limitations are applied separately with respect to
each publicly traded partnership. Consequently, any passive
losses we generate will only be available to offset our passive
income generated in the future and will not be available to
offset income from other passive activities or investments,
including our investments or investments in other publicly
traded partnerships, or salary or active business income.
Passive losses that are not deductible because they exceed a
unitholders share of income we generate may be deducted in
full when he disposes of his entire investment in us in a fully
taxable transaction with an unrelated party. The passive
activity loss rules are applied after other applicable
limitations on deductions, including the at risk rules and the
basis limitation.
Dual consolidated loss restrictions also may apply to limit the
deductibility of losses we incur by a corporate unitholder.
Corporate unitholders are urged to consult their own tax
advisors regarding the applicability and effect to them of dual
consolidated loss restrictions.
182
|
|
|
A unitholders share of our net income may be offset
by any suspended passive losses, but it may not be offset by any
other current or carryover losses from other passive activities,
including those attributable to other publicly traded
partnerships |
Limitations on Interest Deductions. The
deductibility of a non-corporate taxpayers
investment interest expense is generally limited to
the amount of that taxpayers net investment
income. Investment interest expense includes:
|
|
|
|
|
interest on indebtedness properly allocable to property held for
investment; |
|
|
|
our interest expense attributed to portfolio income; and |
|
|
|
the portion of interest expense incurred to purchase or carry an
interest in a passive activity to the extent attributable to
portfolio income. |
The computation of a unitholders investment interest
expense will take into account interest on any margin account
borrowing or other loan incurred to purchase or carry a unit.
Net investment income includes gross income from property held
for investment and amounts treated as portfolio income under the
passive loss rules, less deductible expenses, other than
interest, directly connected with the production of investment
income, but generally does not include gains attributable to the
disposition of property held for investment. The IRS has
indicated that net passive income earned by a publicly traded
partnership will be treated as investment income to its
unitholders. In addition, the unitholders share of our
portfolio income will be treated as investment income.
Entity-Level Collections. If we are required or
elect under applicable law to pay any U.S. federal, state
or local or foreign income or withholding taxes on behalf of any
present or former unitholder or the general partner, we are
authorized to pay those taxes from our funds. That payment, if
made, will be treated as a distribution of cash to the partner
on whose behalf the payment was made. If the payment is made on
behalf of a person whose identity cannot be determined, we are
authorized to treat the payment as a distribution to all current
unitholders. We are authorized to amend the partnership
agreement in the manner necessary to maintain uniformity of
intrinsic tax characteristics of units and to adjust later
distributions, so that after giving effect to these
distributions, the priority and characterization of
distributions otherwise applicable under the partnership
agreement are maintained as nearly as is practicable. Payments
by us as described above could give rise to an overpayment of
tax on behalf of an individual partner, in which event the
partner would be required to file a claim in order to obtain a
credit or refund of tax paid.
Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction. In
general, if we have a net profit, our items of income, gain,
loss, deduction and credit will be allocated among the general
partner and the unitholders in accordance with their percentage
interests in us. At any time that distributions are made to the
common units in excess of distributions to the subordinated
units, or incentive distributions are made to the general
partner, gross income will be allocated to the recipients to the
extent of these distributions. If we have a net loss for the
entire year, that loss will be allocated first to the general
partner and the unitholders in accordance with their percentage
interests in us to the extent of their positive capital accounts
and, second, to the general partner.
Specified items of our income, gain, loss and deduction will be
allocated to account for any difference between the tax basis
and fair market value of property contributed to us by the
general partner and its affiliates, referred to in this
discussion as Contributed Property. The effect of
these allocations to a unitholder purchasing common units in
this offering will be essentially the same as if the tax basis
of our assets were equal to their fair market value at the time
of this offering. In addition, items of recapture income will be
allocated to the extent possible to the partner who was
allocated the deduction giving rise to the treatment of that
gain as recapture income in order to minimize the recognition of
ordinary income by some unitholders. Finally, although we do not
expect that our operations will result in the creation of
negative capital accounts, if negative capital accounts
nevertheless result, items of our income and gain will be
allocated in an amount and manner to eliminate the negative
balance as quickly as possible.
183
An allocation of items of our income, gain, loss, deduction or
credit, other than an allocation required by the Internal
Revenue Code to eliminate the difference between a
partners book capital account, which is
credited with the fair market value of Contributed Property, and
tax capital account, which is credited with the tax
basis of Contributed Property, referred to in this discussion as
the Book-Tax Disparity, will generally be given
effect for federal income tax purposes in determining a
partners share of an item of income, gain, loss, deduction
or credit only if the allocation has substantial economic
effect. In any other case, a partners share of an item
will be determined on the basis of his interest in us, which
will be determined by taking into account all the facts and
circumstances, including:
|
|
|
|
|
his relative contributions to us; |
|
|
|
the interests of all the partners in profits and losses; |
|
|
|
the interest of all the partners in cash flow; and |
|
|
|
the rights of all the partners to distributions of capital upon
liquidation. |
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is of the opinion that, with the
exception of the issues described in
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Section 754 Election and
Disposition of Common Units
Allocations Between Transferors and Transferees,
allocations under our partnership agreement will be given effect
for federal income tax purposes in determining a partners
share of an item of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
Treatment of Short Sales. A unitholder whose units
are loaned to a short seller who sells such units
may be considered as having disposed of those units. If so, he
would no longer be a partner with respect to those units until
the termination of the loan and may recognize gain or loss from
the disposition. As a result:
|
|
|
|
|
any of our income, gain, loss, deduction or credit with respect
to the units may not be reportable by the unitholder who loaned
them; and |
|
|
|
any cash distributions received by such unitholder with respect
to those units may be fully taxable as ordinary income. |
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has not rendered an opinion
regarding the treatment of a unitholder whose common units are
loaned to a short seller; therefore, unitholders desiring to
assure their status as partners and avoid the risk of gain
recognition from a loan to a short seller are urged to ensure
that any applicable brokerage account agreements prohibit their
brokers from borrowing their units. The IRS has announced that
it is actively studying issues relating to the tax treatment of
short sales of partnership interests. Please also read
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Alternative Minimum Tax. Each unitholder will be
required to take into account his distributive share of any
items of our income, gain, loss, deduction or credit for
purposes of the alternative minimum tax. The current minimum tax
rate for noncorporate taxpayers is 26% on the first $175,000 of
alternative minimum taxable income in excess of the exemption
amount and 28% on any additional alternative minimum taxable
income. Prospective unitholders are urged to consult with their
tax advisors as to the impact of an investment in units on their
liability for the alternative minimum tax.
Tax Rates. The highest statutory rate of
U.S. federal income tax for individuals is currently 35%,
and the highest statutory rate of U.S. federal income tax
imposed on net capital gains of an individual is currently 15%
if the asset disposed of was held for more than 12 months
at the time of disposition.
Section 754 Election. Under current law, we
may, and intend to, make an election under Section 754 of
the Internal Revenue Code to adjust a common unit
purchasers U.S. federal income tax basis in our
assets (or inside basis) to reflect the purchasers
purchase price. The Section 743(b) adjustment belongs to
the purchaser and not to other unitholders and does not apply to
unitholders who acquire their common units directly from us. For
purposes of this discussion, a unitholders inside basis in
our assets will be considered to have two components:
(1) his share of our tax basis in our assets (or common
basis) and (2) his Section 743(b) adjustment to
that basis.
184
In general, a purchasers common basis is depreciated or
amortized according to the existing method utilized by us, while
the Section 743(b) adjustment to that basis is depreciated
or amortized in the same manner as property of the same type
that has been newly placed in service by us.
A Section 743(b) adjustment is advantageous if the
purchasers tax basis in his units is higher than the
units share of the aggregate tax basis of our assets
immediately prior to the transfer. In that case, as a result of
the adjustment, the purchaser would have, among other items, a
greater amount of depreciation and amortization deductions and
his share of any gain or loss on a sale of our assets would be
less. Conversely, a Section 743(b) adjustment is
disadvantageous if the purchasers tax basis in his units
is lower than those units share of the aggregate tax basis
of our assets immediately prior to the purchase. Thus, the fair
market value of the units may be affected either favorably or
unfavorably by the Section 743(b) adjustment.
The calculations involved in the Section 743(b) adjustment
are complex and will be made on the basis of assumptions as to
the value of our assets and in accordance with the Internal
Revenue Code and applicable Treasury Regulations. We cannot
assure you that the determinations we make will not be
successfully challenged by the IRS and that the deductions
resulting from them will not be reduced or disallowed
altogether. Should the IRS require a different basis adjustment
to be made, and should, in our opinion, the expense of
compliance exceed the benefit of the election, we may seek
consent from the IRS to revoke our Section 754 election. If
such consent is given, a subsequent purchaser of units may be
allocated more income than he would have been allocated had the
election not been revoked.
Tax Treatment of Operations
Accounting Method and Taxable Year. We use the
year ending December 31 as our taxable year and the accrual
method of accounting for federal income tax purposes. Each
unitholder will be required to include in income his share of
our income, gain, loss, deduction and credit for our taxable
year ending within or with his taxable year. In addition, a
unitholder who disposes of all of his units must include his
share of our income, gain, loss, deduction and credit through
the date of disposition in income for his taxable year that
includes the date of disposition, with the result that a
unitholder who has a taxable year ending on a date other than
December 31 and who disposes of all of his units following
the close of our taxable year but before the close of his
taxable year must include his share of more than one year of our
income, gain, loss, deduction and credit in income for the year
of the disposition. Please read Disposition of
Common Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees.
Initial Tax Basis, Depreciation and Amortization.
The tax basis of our assets will be used for purposes of
computing depreciation and cost recovery deductions and,
ultimately, gain or loss on the disposition of these assets. The
federal income tax burden associated with any difference between
the fair market value of our assets and their tax basis
immediately prior to this offering will be borne by the general
partner. Please read Consequences of Unit
Ownership Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and
Deduction.
To the extent allowable, we may elect to use the depreciation
and cost recovery methods that will result in the largest
deductions being taken in the early years after assets are
placed in service. Property we subsequently acquire or construct
may be depreciated using methods permitted by the Internal
Revenue Code.
If we dispose of depreciable property by sale, foreclosure or
otherwise, all or a portion of any gain, determined by reference
to the amount of depreciation previously deducted and the nature
of the property, may be subject to the recapture rules and taxed
as ordinary income rather than capital gain. Similarly, a
unitholder who has taken cost recovery or depreciation
deductions with respect to property we own will likely be
required to recapture some or all of those deductions as
ordinary income upon a sale of his interest in us. Please read
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction and
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
185
The costs incurred in selling our units (or syndication
expenses) must be capitalized and cannot be deducted
currently, ratably or upon our termination. There are
uncertainties regarding the classification of costs as
organization expenses, which may be amortized by us, and as
syndication expenses, which may not be amortized by us. The
underwriting discounts and commissions we incur will be treated
as syndication expenses.
Valuation and Tax Basis of Our Properties. The
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of units will depend in part on our estimates of the
relative fair market values, and the initial tax bases, of our
assets. Although we may from time to time consult with
professional appraisers regarding valuation matters, we will
make many of the relative fair market value estimates ourselves.
These estimates and determinations of basis are subject to
challenge and will not be binding on the IRS or the courts. If
the estimates of fair market value or basis are later found to
be incorrect, the character and amount of items of income, gain,
loss, deductions or credits previously reported by unitholders
might change, and unitholders might be required to adjust their
tax liability for prior years and incur interest and penalties
with respect to those adjustments.
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss. In general, gain or
loss will be recognized on a sale of units equal to the
difference between the amount realized and the unitholders
tax basis for the units sold. A unitholders amount
realized will be measured by the sum of the cash or the fair
market value of other property received by him plus his share of
our nonrecourse liabilities. Because the amount realized
includes a unitholders share of our nonrecourse
liabilities, the gain recognized on the sale of units could
result in a tax liability in excess of any cash received from
the sale.
Prior distributions from us in excess of cumulative net taxable
income for a common unit that decreased a unitholders tax
basis in that common unit will, in effect, become taxable income
if the common unit is sold at a price greater than the
unitholders tax basis in that common unit, even if the
price received is less than his original cost. Except as noted
below, gain or loss recognized by a unitholder on the sale or
exchange of a unit generally will be taxable as capital gain or
loss. Capital gain recognized by an individual on the sale of
units held more than one year generally will be taxed at a
maximum rate of 15%.
A portion of a unitholders amount realized may be
allocable to unrealized receivables or to
inventory items we own. The term unrealized
receivables includes potential recapture items, including
depreciation recapture. A unitholder will recognize ordinary
income or loss to the extent of the difference between the
portion of the unitholders amount realized allocable to
unrealized receivables or inventory items and the
unitholders share of our basis in such receivables or
inventory items. Ordinary income attributable to unrealized
receivables, inventory items and depreciation recapture may
exceed net taxable gain realized upon the sale of a unit and may
be recognized even if there is a net taxable loss realized on
the sale of a unit. Thus, a unitholder may recognize both
ordinary income and a capital loss upon a sale of units. Net
capital losses generally may only be used to offset capital
gains. An exception permits individuals to offset up to $3,000
of net capital losses against ordinary income in any given year.
The IRS has ruled that a partner who acquires interests in a
partnership in separate transactions must combine those
interests and maintain a single adjusted tax basis for all those
interests. Upon a sale or other disposition of less than all of
those interests, a portion of that tax basis must be allocated
to the interests sold using an equitable
apportionment method. Treasury Regulations under
Section 1223 of the Internal Revenue Code allow a selling
unitholder who can identify common units transferred with an
ascertainable holding period to elect to use the actual holding
period of the common units transferred. Thus, according to the
ruling, a common unitholder will be unable to select high or low
basis common units to sell as would be the case with corporate
stock, but, according to the regulations, may designate specific
common units sold for purposes of determining the holding period
of units transferred. A unitholder electing to use the actual
holding period of common units transferred must consistently use
that identification method for all subsequent sales or exchanges
of common units. A unitholder considering the
186
purchase of additional units or a sale of common units purchased
in separate transactions is urged to consult his tax advisor as
to the possible consequences of this ruling and application of
the regulations.
Specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code affect the
taxation of some financial products and securities, including
partnership interests, by treating a taxpayer as having sold an
appreciated partnership interest, one in which gain
would be recognized if it were sold, assigned or terminated at
its fair market value, if the taxpayer or related persons
enter(s) into:
|
|
|
|
|
a short sale; |
|
|
|
an offsetting notional principal contract; or |
|
|
|
a futures or forward contract with respect to the partnership
interest or substantially identical property. |
Moreover, if a taxpayer has previously entered into a short
sale, an offsetting notional principal contract or a futures or
forward contract with respect to the partnership interest, the
taxpayer will be treated as having sold that position if the
taxpayer or a related person then acquires the partnership
interest or substantially identical property. The Secretary of
the Treasury is also authorized to issue regulations that treat
a taxpayer that enters into transactions or positions that have
substantially the same effect as the preceding transactions as
having constructively sold the financial position.
Allocations Between Transferors and Transferees.
In general, our taxable income or loss will be
determined annually, will be prorated on a monthly basis and
will be subsequently apportioned among the unitholders in
proportion to the number of units owned by each of them as of
the opening of the applicable exchange on the first business day
of the month. However, gain or loss realized on a sale or other
disposition of our assets other than in the ordinary course of
business will be allocated among the unitholders on the first
business day of the month in which that gain or loss is
recognized. As a result of the foregoing, a unitholder
transferring units may be allocated income, gain, loss,
deduction and credit realized after the date of transfer.
The use of this method for allocating income and deductions
among unitholders may not be permitted under existing Treasury
Regulations. Accordingly, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is unable
to opine on its validity. If this method were disallowed or
applied only to transfers of less than all of the
unitholders interest, our taxable income or losses may be
reallocated among the unitholders. We are authorized to revise
our method of allocation to conform to a method permitted under
any future Treasury Regulations or administrative guidance.
A unitholder who owns units at any time during a calendar
quarter and who disposes of them prior to the record date set
for a cash distribution for that quarter will be allocated items
of our income, gain, loss and deductions attributable to that
quarter but will not be entitled to receive that cash
distribution.
Transfer Notification Requirements. A unitholder
who sells any of his units, other than through a broker,
generally is required to notify us in writing of that sale
within 30 days after the sale (or, if earlier,
January 15 of the year following the sale). A unitholder
who acquires units generally is required to notify us in writing
of that acquisition within 30 days after the purchase,
unless a broker or nominee will satisfy such requirement. We are
required to notify the IRS of any such transfers of units and to
furnish specified information to the transferor and transferee.
Failure to notify us of a transfer of units may lead to the
imposition of substantial penalties.
Constructive Termination. We will be considered to
have been terminated for tax purposes if there is a sale or
exchange of 50% or more of the total interests in our capital
and profits within a 12-month period. A constructive termination
results in the closing of our taxable year for all unitholders.
In the case of a unitholder reporting on a taxable year other
than a fiscal year ending December 31, the closing of our
taxable year may result in more than 12 months of our taxable
income or loss being includable in his taxable income for the
year of termination. We would be required to make new tax
elections after a termination, including a new election under
Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code, and a termination
would result in a deferral of our deductions for depreciation. A
termination could also result in penalties if
187
we were unable to determine that the termination had occurred.
Moreover, a termination might either accelerate the application
of, or subject us to, tax legislation applicable to a newly
formed partnership.
Foreign Tax Credit Considerations
Subject to detailed limitations set forth in the Internal
Revenue Code, a unitholder may elect to claim a credit against
his liability for U.S. federal income tax for his share of
foreign income taxes (and certain foreign taxes imposed in lieu
of a tax based upon income) paid by us (see Taxation of
the Partnership). Income allocated to unitholders will
likely constitute foreign source income falling in the residual
foreign tax credit category (or general basket) for purposes of
the U.S. foreign tax credit limitation. The rules relating to
the determination of the foreign tax credit are complex and
prospective unitholders are urged to consult their own tax
advisors to determine whether or to what extent they would be
entitled to such credit. Unitholders who do not elect to claim
foreign tax credits may instead claim a deduction for their
shares of foreign taxes paid by us.
Tax-Exempt Organizations, Regulated Investment Companies and
Non-U.S. Investors
Investments in units by employee benefit plans, other tax-exempt
organizations, regulated investment companies and non-U.S.
persons, including nonresident aliens of the United States,
non-U.S. corporations and non-U.S. trusts and estates
(collectively, non-U.S. unitholders) raise issues unique
to those investors and, as described below, may have
substantially adverse tax consequences to them.
Employee benefit plans and most other organizations exempt from
federal income tax, including individual retirement accounts and
other retirement plans, are subject to federal income tax on
unrelated business taxable income. Virtually all of our income
allocated to a unitholder that is a tax-exempt organization will
be unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to them.
A regulated investment company or mutual fund is
required to derive 90% or more of its gross income from certain
qualifying sources including, under current law, interest,
dividends, gains from the sale of stocks or securities or
foreign currency gains. It is not anticipated that any
significant amount of our gross income will be from these
sources. Recently enacted legislation treats net income derived
from certain publicly traded partnerships, such as us, as
qualifying income to a regulated investment company provided
that the regulated investment company invests no more than 25%
of the value of its total assets in such publicly traded
partnerships and owns no more than 10% of the voting rights
associated with any one publicly traded partnership. However,
this legislation is only effective for taxable years of
regulated investment companies beginning after October 22,
2004.
A non-U.S. unitholder may be subject to a 4%
U.S. federal income tax on his share of the
U.S. source portion of our gross income attributable to
transportation that begins or ends (but not both) in the United
States, unless either (i) an exemption applies and he files
a U.S. federal income tax return to claim that exemption or
(ii) that income is effectively connected with the conduct
of a trade or business in the United States (or U.S.
effectively connected income). For this purpose,
transportation income includes income from the use, hiring or
leasing of a vessel to transport cargo, or the performance of
services directly related to the use of any vessel to transport
cargo. The U.S. source portion of our transportation income
is deemed to be 50% of the income attributable to voyages that
begin or end in the United States. Generally, no amount of the
income from voyages that begin and end outside the United States
is treated as U.S. source, and consequently none of our
transportation income attributable to such voyages is subject to
U.S. federal income tax. Although the entire amount of
transportation income from voyages that begin and end in the
United States would be fully taxable in the United States, we do
not expect to have any transportation income from voyages that
begin and end in the United States.
We may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax,
computed at the highest statutory rate, from cash distributions
to non-U.S. unitholders with respect to their shares of our
income that is U.S. effectively connected income. Our
transportation income generally should not be treated as
U.S. effectively connected income unless we have a fixed
place of business in the United States involved in the earning
of such transportation income and certain other requirements are
satisfied. While we do not
188
expect to have a fixed place of business in the United States,
there can be no guarantee that this will not change. Under a
ruling of the IRS, a portion of any gain recognized on the sale
or other disposition of a unit by a non-U.S. unitholder may
be treated as U.S. effectively connected income to the
extent we have a fixed place of business in the United States
and a sale of our assets would have given rise to
U.S. effectively connected income. A
non-U.S. unitholder would be required to file a
U.S. federal income tax return to report his
U.S. effectively connected income (including his share of
any such income earned by us) and to pay U.S. federal
income tax, or claim a credit or refund for tax withheld on such
income. Further, unless an exemption applies, a
non-U.S. corporation investing in units may be subject to a
branch profits tax, at a 30% rate or lower rate prescribed by a
treaty, with respect to such U.S. effectively connected
income.
A non-U.S. unitholder may be entitled to an exemption from
the 4% U.S. federal income tax or a refund of tax withheld
on U.S. effectively connected income that constitutes
transportation income if any of the following applies:
(1) such non-U.S. unitholder qualifies for an
exemption from such tax under an income tax treaty between the
United States and the country where such
non-U.S. unitholder is resident; (2) in the case of an
individual non-U.S. unitholder, he qualifies for the
exemption from tax under Section 872(b)(1) of the Internal
Revenue Code as a resident of a country that grants an
equivalent exemption from tax to residents of the United States;
or (3) in the case of a corporate non-U.S. unitholder,
it qualifies for the exemption from tax under Section 883
of the Internal Revenue Code (or the Section 883
Exemption) (for the rules relating to qualification for the
Section 883 Exemption, please read below under
Possible Classification as a
Corporation The Section 883 Exemption).
Non-U.S. unitholders must apply for and obtain a
U.S. taxpayer identification number in order to file
U.S. federal income tax returns and must provide that
identification number to us for purposes of any
U.S. federal income tax information returns we may be
required to file. Non-U.S. unitholders are encouraged to
consult with their own tax advisors regarding the
U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences of an
investment in units and any filing requirements related thereto.
Functional Currency
We are required to determine our functional currency for U.S.
federal income tax purposes and report our affairs in this
functional currency to our unitholders. In addition, we are
required to determine whether any of our operations constitutes
a separate qualified business unit (or QBU) for U.S.
federal income tax purposes and, if so, whether the functional
currency of any such QBU differs from our functional currency.
Any transactions conducted by us or such a QBU other than in a
functional currency may give rise to foreign currency exchange
gain or loss. Further, if we are or such a QBU is required to
maintain a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar,
a unitholder may be required to recognize foreign currency
translation income or loss upon the sale of units or upon
distributions of money or property by us or such other QBU.
For purposes of the foreign currency rules described immediately
above, a QBU includes a separate trade or business owned by a
partnership in the event separate books and records are
maintained for such separate trade or business. The functional
currency of a QBU is determined based upon the economic
environment in which the QBU operates. Thus, a QBU whose
revenues and expenses are primarily determined in a currency
other than the U.S. dollar will have a non-U.S. dollar
functional currency.
We believe that our functional currency is the U.S. dollar,
but that certain of our operations constitute separate QBUs
whose functional currencies are other than the U.S. dollar.
In such case, a unitholder generally will be required to
recognize a certain amount of foreign currency translation
income or loss upon the sale of units or upon our receipt of
distributions of money or property from such a separate QBU.
Foreign currency translation income or loss will be treated as
ordinary income or loss and thus will not be eligible for the
reduced rate of taxation that may be applicable to capital
gains. Under proposed regulations (or the Section 987
Proposed Regulations), the amount of translation income or
loss recognized will reflect the appreciation or depreciation in
the functional currency value of capital invested
189
in and profits retained by the QBU between the time the
unitholder purchased his units and the time we receive
distributions from such QBU or the unitholder sells his units.
Based upon our current projections of the capital invested in
and profits of our non-U.S. dollar QBUs, we believe that
unitholders will be required to recognize only a nominal amount
of foreign currency translation income or loss each year and
upon their sale of units. The amount of translation income or
loss recognized, however, generally will depend upon each
unitholders particular circumstances, including the
purchase price paid for units. Nonetheless, the rules for
determining the amount of translation income presently are not
entirely clear as the Section 987 Proposed Regulations are
not currently effective and are proposed to be effective only
after the expiration of 30 days after promulgation by the
Treasury Department as final regulations. Furthermore, the
Treasury Department has recently indicated that it intends to
review and possibly replace the Section 987 Proposed
Regulations, and thus currently there is significant uncertainty
regarding the manner of computation of foreign currency
translation income or loss with respect to a QBU that maintains
a non-U.S. dollar functional currency. Please consult your
own tax advisor for specific advice regarding the application of
the rules for recognizing foreign currency translation income or
loss under your own circumstances.
In addition to a unitholders recognition of foreign
currency translation income or loss, we will engage in certain
transactions denominated in the Euro, and consequently, we
expect to recognize a certain amount of foreign currency
exchange gain or loss each year. Such foreign currency exchange
gain or loss will be treated as ordinary income or loss and thus
will not be eligible for the reduced rate of taxation that may
be applicable to capital gains.
Administrative Matters
Information Returns and Audit Procedures. We
intend to furnish to each unitholder, within 90 days after
the close of each calendar year, specific U.S. federal
income tax information, including a document in the form of IRS
Form 1065, Schedule K-1, which sets forth his share of our
income, gain, loss, deductions and credits as computed for U.S.
federal income tax purposes for our preceding taxable year. In
preparing this information, which will not be reviewed by
counsel, we will take various accounting and reporting
positions, some of which have been mentioned earlier, to
determine his share of such income, gain, loss, deduction and
credit. We cannot assure you that those positions will yield a
result that conforms to the requirements of the Internal Revenue
Code, Treasury Regulations or administrative interpretations of
the IRS. Neither we nor Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. can assure
prospective unitholders that the IRS will not successfully
contend in court that those positions are impermissible. Any
challenge by the IRS could negatively affect the value of the
units.
We will be obligated to file U.S. federal income tax information
returns with the IRS for any year in which we earn any U.S.
source income or U.S. effectively connected income. In the event
we were obligated to file a U.S. federal income tax information
return but failed to do so, unitholders would not be entitled to
claim any deductions, losses or credits for U.S. federal income
tax purposes relating to us. Consequently, we may file U.S.
federal income tax information returns for any given year. The
IRS may audit any such information returns that we file.
Adjustments resulting from an IRS audit of our return may
require each unitholder to adjust a prior years tax
liability, and may result in an audit of his return. Any audit
of a unitholders return could result in adjustments not
related to our returns as well as those related to our returns.
Any IRS audit relating to our items of income, gain, loss,
deduction or credit for years in which we are not required to
file and do not file a U.S. federal income tax information
return would be conducted at the partner-level, and each
unitholder may be subject to separate audit proceedings relating
to such items.
For years in which we file or are required to file U.S. federal
income tax information returns, we will be treated as a separate
entity for purposes of any U.S. federal income tax audits, as
well as for purposes of judicial review of administrative
adjustments by the IRS and tax settlement proceedings. For such
years, the tax treatment of partnership items of income, gain,
loss, deduction and credit will be determined in a partnership
proceeding rather than in separate proceedings with the
partners. The Internal Revenue
190
Code requires that one partner be designated as the Tax
Matters Partner for these purposes. The partnership
agreement names Teekay GP L.L.C. as our Tax Matters Partner.
The Tax Matters Partner will make some U.S. federal tax
elections on our behalf and on behalf of unitholders. In
addition, the Tax Matters Partner can extend the statute of
limitations for assessment of tax deficiencies against
unitholders for items reported in the information returns we
file. The Tax Matters Partner may bind a unitholder with less
than a 1% profits interest in us to a settlement with the IRS
with respect to these items unless that unitholder elects, by
filing a statement with the IRS, not to give that authority to
the Tax Matters Partner. The Tax Matters Partner may seek
judicial review, by which all the unitholders are bound, of a
final partnership administrative adjustment and, if the Tax
Matters Partner fails to seek judicial review, judicial review
may be sought by any unitholder having at least a 1% interest in
profits or by any group of unitholders having in the aggregate
at least a 5% interest in profits. However, only one action for
judicial review will go forward, and each unitholder with an
interest in the outcome may participate.
A unitholder must file a statement with the IRS identifying the
treatment of any item on his federal income tax return that is
not consistent with the treatment of the item on an information
return that we file. Intentional or negligent disregard of this
consistency requirement may subject a unitholder to substantial
penalties.
Special Reporting Requirements for Owners of Non-U.S.
Partnerships. A U.S. person who either contributes more
than $100,000 to us (when added to the value of any other
property contributed to us by such person or a related person
during the previous 12 months), or following a contribution
owns, directly, indirectly or by attribution from certain
related persons, at least a 10% interest in us, is required to
file IRS Form 8865 with his U.S. federal income tax return
for the year of the contribution to report the contribution and
provide certain details about himself and certain related
persons, us and any persons that own a 10% or greater direct
interest in us. We will provide each unitholder with the
necessary information about us and those persons who own a 10%
or greater direct interest in us along with the
Schedule K-1 information described previously.
In addition to the foregoing, a U.S. person who directly owns at
least a 10% interest in us may be required to make additional
disclosures on IRS Form 8865 in the event such person acquires,
disposes or has his interest in us substantially increased or
reduced. Further, a U.S. person who directly, indirectly or by
attribution from certain related persons, owns at least a 10%
interest in us may be required to make additional disclosures on
IRS Form 8865 in the event such person, when considered
together with any other U.S. persons who own at least a 10%
interest in us, owns a greater than 50% interest in us. For
these purposes, an interest in us generally is
defined to include an interest in our capital or profits or an
interest in our deductions or losses.
Significant penalties may apply for failing to satisfy IRS
Form 8865 filing requirements and thus unitholders are
advised to contact their tax advisors to determine the
application of these filing requirements under their own
circumstances.
Accuracy-related Penalties. An additional tax
equal to 20% of the amount of any portion of an underpayment of
U.S. federal income tax that is attributable to one or more
specified causes, including negligence or disregard of rules or
regulations and substantial understatements of income tax, is
imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. No penalty will be
imposed, however, for any portion of an underpayment if it is
shown that there was a reasonable cause for that portion and
that the taxpayer acted in good faith regarding that portion.
A substantial understatement of income tax in any taxable year
exists if the amount of the understatement exceeds the greater
of 10% of the tax required to be shown on the return for the
taxable
191
year or $5,000. The amount of any understatement subject to
penalty generally is reduced if any portion is attributable to a
position adopted on the return:
|
|
|
(1) for which there is, or was, substantial
authority; or |
|
|
(2) as to which there is a reasonable basis and the
pertinent facts of that position are disclosed on the return. |
More stringent rules, including additional penalties and
extended statutes of limitations, may apply as a result of our
participation in listed transactions or
reportable transactions with a significant tax avoidance
purpose. While we do not anticipate participating in such
transactions, if any item of income, gain, loss, deduction or
credit included in the distributive shares of unitholders for a
given year might result in an understatement of
income relating to such a transaction, we will disclose the
pertinent facts on a U.S. federal income tax information return
for such year. In such event, we also will make a reasonable
effort to furnish sufficient information for unitholders to make
adequate disclosure on their returns and to take other actions
as may be appropriate to permit unitholders to avoid liability
for penalties.
Possible Classification as a Corporation
If we fail to meet the Qualifying Income Exception described
previously with respect to our classification as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, other than a failure that
is determined by the IRS to be inadvertent and that is cured
within a reasonable time after discovery, we will be treated as
a non-U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If
previously treated as a partnership, our change in status would
be deemed to have been effectuated by our transfer of all of our
assets, subject to liabilities, to a newly formed non-U.S.
corporation, in return for stock in that corporation, and then
our distribution of that stock to our unitholders and other
owners in liquidation of their interests in us. Unitholders that
are U.S. persons would be required to file IRS Form 926 to
report these deemed transfers and any other transfers they made
to us while we were treated as a corporation and may be required
to recognize income or gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes
to the extent of certain prior deductions or losses and other
items. Substantial penalties may apply for failure to satisfy
these reporting requirements, unless the person otherwise
required to report shows such failure was due to reasonable
cause and not willful neglect.
If we were treated as a corporation in any taxable year, either
as a result of a failure to meet the Qualifying Income Exception
or otherwise, our items of income, gain, loss, deduction and
credit would not pass through to unitholders. Instead, we would
be subject to U.S. federal income tax based on the rules
applicable to foreign corporations, not partnerships, and such
items would be treated as our own. Any distribution made to a
unitholder would be treated as either taxable dividend income,
to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and
profits, or, in the absence of earnings and profits, a
nontaxable return of capital, to the extent of the
unitholders tax basis in his common units, or taxable
capital gain, after the unitholders tax basis in his
common units is reduced to zero. Section 743(b) adjustments
to the basis of our assets would no longer be available to
purchasers in the marketplace. Please read
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Section 754 Election. Also, as a result of our
treatment as a corporation and as discussed in detail below, we
may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on certain U.S. source
income and U.S. effectively connected income, and depending upon
the nature and extent of our activities at the time we are
treated as a corporation, we may be considered to be a passive
foreign investment company (or PFIC), in which case
special rules would apply to unitholders. Furthermore, if we are
treated as a corporation, unitholders will not be entitled to
claim any credit against their U.S. federal income tax
liability for non-U.S. taxes incurred by us. Finally, in the
event we were treated as a corporation at a time when we are
owned predominantly by U.S. persons, each of whom individually
owns a significant proportion of the units, we may be treated as
a controlled foreign corporation, and such U.S. persons may be
subject to special taxation rules described below.
192
|
|
|
Taxation of Operating Income |
In the event we were treated as a corporation, our operating
income may be subject to U.S. federal income taxation under one
of two alternative tax regimes (the 4% gross basis tax or the
net basis tax, as described below).
We may be subject to a 4% U.S. federal income tax on the U.S.
source portion of our gross income (without benefit of
deductions) attributable to transportation that begins or ends
(but not both) in the United States, unless the Section 883
Exemption applies (as more fully described below under
The Section 883 Exemption) and we
file a U.S. federal income tax return to claim that exemption.
For this purpose, gross income attributable to transportation
(or transportation income) includes income from the use,
hiring or leasing of a vessel to transport cargo, or the
performance of services directly related to the use of any
vessel to transport cargo, and thus includes time charter or
bareboat charter income. The U.S. source portion of our
transportation income is deemed to be 50% of the income
attributable to voyages that begin or end (but not both) in the
United States. Generally, no amount of the income from voyages
that begin and end outside the United States is treated as
U.S. source, and consequently none of the transportation
income attributable to such voyages is subject to
U.S. federal income tax. Although the entire amount of
transportation income from voyages that begin and end in the
United States would be fully taxable in the United States, we do
not expect to have any transportation income from voyages that
begin and end in the United States.
|
|
|
Net Basis Tax and Branch Tax Regime |
We currently do not expect to have a fixed place of business in
the United States. Nonetheless, if this were to change or we
otherwise were treated as having such a fixed place of business
involved in earning U.S. source transportation income, such
transportation income may be treated as effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States.
Any income that we earn that is treated as U.S. effectively
connected income would be subject to U.S. federal corporate
income tax (the highest statutory rate is currently 35%), unless
the Section 883 Exemption (as discussed below) applied. The
4% U.S. federal income tax described above is
inapplicable to U.S. effectively connected income, however.
Unless the Section 883 Exemption applied, a 30% branch
profits tax imposed under Section 884 of the Internal
Revenue Code also would apply to our earnings that result from
U.S. effectively connected income, and a branch interest tax
could be imposed on certain interest paid or deemed paid by us.
Furthermore, on the sale of a vessel that has produced
U.S. effectively connected income, we could be subject to
the net basis corporate income tax and to the 30% branch profits
tax with respect to our gain not in excess of certain prior
deductions for depreciation that reduced U.S. effectively
connected income. Otherwise, we would not be subject to
U.S. federal income tax with respect to gain realized on
sale of a vessel because it is expected that any sale of a
vessel will be structured so that it is considered to occur
outside of the United States and so that it is not attributable
to an office or other fixed place of business in the United
States.
|
|
|
The Section 883 Exemption |
In general, if a non-U.S. corporation satisfies the requirements
of Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code and the
Treasury Regulations thereunder (or the Final Section 883
Regulations), it will not be subject to the 4% gross basis tax
or the net basis tax described above on its U.S. source
transportation income attributable to voyages that begin or end
(but not both) in the United States (or U.S. Source
International Shipping Income).
A non-U.S. corporation will qualify for the Section 883
Exemption if, among other things, it is organized in a
jurisdiction outside the United States that grants an equivalent
exemption from tax to corporations organized in the United
States (or an Equivalent Exemption), it meets one of
three ownership tests described below: (1) the more than
50% ownership test (or the Ownership Test); (2) the
193
Publicly Traded Test; or (3) the
controlled foreign corporation test (the CFC
Test) and certain substantiation, reporting and
other requirements are met.
In order to satisfy the Ownership Test, a non-U.S. corporation
must be able to substantiate that more than 50% of the value of
its stock is owned, directly or indirectly applying attribution
rules, by qualified shareholders for at least half
of the number of days in the non-U.S. corporations
taxable year, and the non-U.S. corporation must comply with
certain substantiation and reporting requirements. For this
purpose, qualified shareholders are individuals who are
residents (as defined for U.S. federal income tax purposes)
of countries that grant an Equivalent Exemption,
non-U.S. corporations that meet the Publicly Traded Test of
the Final Section 883 Regulations and are organized in
countries that grant an Equivalent Exemption, or certain foreign
governments, non profit organizations and certain beneficiaries
of foreign pension funds. Unitholders who are citizens or
residents of the United States or are domestic corporations are
not qualified shareholders.
In addition, a corporation claiming the Section 883
Exemption based on the Ownership Test must obtain statements
from the holders relied upon to satisfy the Ownership Test,
signed under penalty of perjury, including the owners
name, permanent address and country where the individual is
fully liable to tax, if any, a description of the owners
ownership interest in the non-U.S. corporation, including
information regarding ownership in any intermediate entities,
and certain other information. In addition, we would be required
to file a U.S. federal income tax return and list on our
U.S. federal income tax return the name and address of each
unitholder holding 5% or more of the value of our units who is
relied upon to meet the Ownership Test.
The Publicly Traded Test requires that one or more classes of
equity representing more than 50% of the voting power and value
in a non-U.S. corporation be primarily and regularly
traded on an established securities market either in
the U.S. or in a foreign country that grants an Equivalent
Exemption. For this purpose, if one or more 5% shareholders
(i.e., a shareholder holding, actually or constructively, at
least 5% of the vote and value of a class of equity) own in the
aggregate 50% or more of the vote and value of a class of
equity, such class of equity will not be treated as primarily
and regularly traded on an established securities market.
The CFC Test requires that the non-U.S. corporation be treated
as a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. federal income
tax purposes and an income inclusion test is met (for the
definition of controlled foreign corporation please
read the discussion below under Consequences
of Possible Controlled Foreign Corporation Classification).
We are organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall
Islands. The U.S. Treasury Department has recognized the
Republic of the Marshall Islands as a jurisdiction that grants
an Equivalent Exemption. Consequently, in the event we were
treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, our U.S. Source International Shipping Income
(including for this purpose, any such income earned by our
subsidiaries that have properly elected to be treated as
partnerships or disregarded as entities separate from us for
U.S. federal income tax purposes), would be exempt from
U.S. federal income taxation provided we meet the Ownership
Test or we satisfy either the CFC Test or the Publicly Traded
Test. We do not believe that we will meet the CFC Test, as we do
not expect to be a CFC (please read below under
Consequences of Possible Controlled Foreign
Corporation Classification), and while not completely
clear, we may not meet the Publicly Traded Test due to Teekay
Shipping Corporations substantial indirect ownership of
us. Nonetheless, as of the date of this prospectus, we believe
that we should satisfy the Ownership Test based upon the
ownership immediately after the offering of more than 50% of the
value of us by Teekay Shipping Corporation.
Based on information provided by Teekay Shipping Corporation,
Teekay Shipping Corporation is organized in the Republic of the
Marshall Islands and meets the Publicly Traded Test under
current law and under the Final Section 883 Regulations. As
long as Teekay Shipping Corporation owns more than 50% of the
value of us and satisfies the Publicly Traded Test, we will
satisfy the Ownership Test and will qualify for the
Section 883 Exemption, provided that Teekay Shipping
Corporation provides properly completed ownership statements to
us as required under the Final Section 883 Regulations and
we satisfy
194
certain substantiation and documentation requirements. As of the
date hereof, Teekay Shipping Corporation would be willing to
provide us with such ownership statements as long as it is a
qualifying shareholder. There is no assurance that Teekay
Shipping Corporation will continue to satisfy the requirements
for being a qualified shareholder of us (i.e. that it will meet
the Publicly Traded Test or that it will by itself own more than
50% of the value of our units). At some time in the future, it
may become necessary for us to look to our other non-U.S.
unitholders to determine whether more than 50% of our units, by
value, are owned by non-U.S. unitholders who are qualifying
shareholders and certain non-U.S. unitholders may be asked to
provide ownership statements, signed under penalty of perjury,
with respect to their investment in our units in order for us to
qualify for the Section 883 Exemption. If we cannot obtain
such statements from unitholders holding, in the aggregate, more
than 50% of the value of our units, under the Final
Section 883 Regulations, we would not be eligible to claim
the Section 883 Exemption, and, therefore, we would be
required to pay a 4% tax on the gross amount of our
U.S. Source International Shipping Income, thereby reducing
the amount of cash available for distribution to unitholders.
The determination of whether we will satisfy the Ownership Test
at any given time depends upon a multitude of factors, including
Teekay Shipping Corporations ownership of us, whether
Teekay Shipping Corporations stock is publicly traded, the
concentration of ownership of Teekay Shipping Corporations
own stock and the satisfaction of various substantiation and
documentation requirements. There can be no assurance that we
will satisfy these requirements at any given time and thus that
our U.S. Source International Shipping Income would be
exempt from U.S. federal income taxation by reason of
Section 883 in any of our taxable years if we were treated
as a corporation.
|
|
|
Consequences of Possible PFIC Classification |
A non-United States entity treated as a corporation for United
States federal income tax purposes will be a PFIC in any taxable
year in which, after taking into account the income and assets
of the corporation and certain subsidiaries pursuant to a
look through rule, either (1) at least 75% of
its gross income is passive income (or the income
test) or (2) at least 50% of the average value of its
assets is attributable to assets that produce passive income or
are held for the production of passive income (or the assets
test).
Based upon our current assets and operations, we do not believe
that we would be considered to be a PFIC even if we were treated
as a corporation. There are, however, legal uncertainties
involved and, in addition, there is no assurance that the nature
of our assets, income and operations will remain the same in the
future. We are not relying on an opinion of counsel on this
issue. Therefore, there is a meaningful risk that the IRS would
consider us to be a PFIC, and no assurance can be given that we
would not become a PFIC in the future, in the event we were
treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
If we were classified as a PFIC, for any year during which a
unitholder owns units, he generally will be subject to special
rules (regardless of whether we continue thereafter to be a
PFIC) with respect to (1) any excess
distribution (generally, any distribution received by a
unitholder in a taxable year that is greater than 125% of the
average annual distributions received by the unitholder in the
three preceding taxable years or, if shorter, the
unitholders holding period for the units) and (2) any
gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of units. Under
these rules:
|
|
|
|
|
the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over
the unitholders holding period; |
|
|
|
the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any year
prior to the first year in which we were a PFIC will be taxed as
ordinary income in the current year; |
|
|
|
the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years in the
unitholders holding period will be subject to U.S. federal
income tax at the highest rate in effect for the applicable
class of taxpayer for that year; and |
|
|
|
an interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit will be
imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each
such other taxable year. |
195
Certain elections, such as a qualified electing fund (or
QEF) election or mark to market election, may be
available to a unitholder if we were classified as a PFIC. If we
determine that we are or will be a PFIC, we will provide
unitholders with information concerning the potential
availability of such elections.
Under current law, dividends received by individual citizens or
residents of the United States from domestic corporations and
qualified foreign corporations generally are treated as net
capital gains and subject to U.S. federal income tax at reduced
rates (generally 15%). However, if we were classified as a PFIC
for our taxable year in which we pay a dividend, we would not be
considered a qualified foreign corporation, and individuals
receiving such dividends would not be eligible for the reduced
rate of U.S. federal income tax.
|
|
|
Consequences of Possible Controlled Foreign Corporation
Classification |
If more than 50% of either the total combined voting power of
our outstanding units entitled to vote or the total value of all
of our outstanding units were owned, actually or constructively,
by citizens or residents of the United States, U.S. partnerships
or corporations, or U.S. estates or trusts (as defined for U.S.
federal income tax purposes), each of which owned, actually or
constructively, 10% or more of the total combined voting power
of our outstanding units entitled to vote (each, a U.S.
Shareholder), we could be treated as a controlled foreign
corporation (or CFC) at any such time as we are properly
classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. U.S. Shareholders of a CFC are treated as receiving
current distributions of their shares of certain income of the
CFC (not including, under current law, certain undistributed
earnings attributable to shipping income) without regard to any
actual distributions and are subject to other burdensome U.S.
federal income tax and administrative requirements but generally
are not also subject to the requirements generally applicable to
owners of a PFIC. Although we do not believe we will be a CFC
following the Offering, U.S. persons purchasing a substantial
interest in us should consider the potential implications of
being treated as a U.S. Shareholder in the event we were a CFC
in the future.
196
NON-UNITED STATES TAX CONSEQUENCES
Marshall Islands Tax Consequences
The following discussion is based upon the opinion of Watson,
Farley & Williams (New York) LLP, our counsel as
to matters of the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands,
and the current laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands
applicable to persons who do not reside in, maintain offices in
or engage in business in the Republic of the Marshall Islands.
Because we and our subsidiaries do not, and we do not expect
that we and our subsidiaries will, conduct business or
operations in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and because
all documentation related to this offering will be executed
outside of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, under current
Marshall Islands law you will not be subject to Marshall Islands
taxation or withholding on distributions, including upon a
return of capital, we make to you as a unitholder. In addition,
you will not be subject to Marshall Islands stamp, capital gains
or other taxes on the purchase, ownership or disposition of
common units, and you will not be required by the Republic of
the Marshall Islands to file a tax return relating to the common
units.
It is the responsibility of each unitholder to investigate the
legal and tax consequences, under the laws of pertinent
jurisdictions, including the Marshall Islands, of his investment
in us. Accordingly, each prospective unitholder is urged to
consult, and depend upon, his tax counsel or other advisor with
regard to those matters. Further, it is the responsibility of
each unitholder to file all state, local and non-U.S., as well
as U.S. federal tax returns, that may be required of him.
Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following discussion is a summary of the material Canadian
federal income tax consequences under the Income Tax Act
(Canada) (the Canada Tax Act), as of the date of this
prospectus, that we believe are relevant to holders of common
units acquired in this offering who are, at all relevant times,
for the purposes of the Canada Tax Act and the Canada-United
States Tax Convention 1980 (the Canada-U.S. Treaty)
resident in the United States and who deal at arms length
with us and Teekay Shipping Corporation (U.S. Resident
Holders).
Under the Canada Tax Act, no taxes on income (including taxable
capital gains) are payable by U.S. Resident Holders in respect
of the acquisition, holding, disposition or redemption of the
common units, provided that we do not carry on business in
Canada and such U.S. Resident Holders do not, for the purposes
of the Canada-U.S. Treaty, otherwise have a permanent
establishment or fixed base in Canada to which such common units
pertain and, in addition, do not use or hold and are not deemed
or considered to use or hold such common units in the course of
carrying on a business in Canada and, in the case of any U.S.
Resident Holders that carry on an insurance business in Canada
and elsewhere, such U.S. Resident Holders establish that the
common units are not effectively connected with their insurance
business carried on in Canada.
In this connection, we believe that our activities and affairs
can be conducted in a manner that we will not be carrying on
business in Canada and that U.S. Resident Holders should not be
considered to be carrying on business in Canada for purposes of
the Canada Tax Act solely by reason of the acquisition, holding,
disposition or redemption of their common units. We intend that
this is and continues to be the case, notwithstanding that
certain services will be provided to Teekay LNG Partners L.P.,
indirectly through arrangements with Teekay Shipping Limited (a
subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation that is resident and
based in the Bahamas), by Canadian service providers, as
discussed below.
Under the Canada Tax Act, a resident of Canada (which may
include a foreign corporation the central management and control
of which is in Canada) is subject to Canadian tax on its
world-wide income, subject to any relief that may be provided by
any relevant tax treaty. A non-resident corporation or
individual that carries on a business in Canada directly or
through a partnership is, subject to any relevant tax treaty,
subject to tax in Canada on income attributable to its business
(or that of the partnerships, as the case may be) carried
on in Canada. The Canada Tax Act contains special rules that
197
provide assurance to qualifying international shipping
corporations that they will not be considered resident in Canada
even if they are, in whole or in part, managed from Canada.
Further, the Canada Tax Act and many of the tax treaties to
which Canada is a party also contain special exemptions for
profits derived from international shipping operations.
We will enter into an agreement with Teekay Shipping Limited for
the provision of administrative services, and certain of our
operating subsidiaries will enter into agreements with:
|
|
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Limited for the provision of advisory,
technical, ship management and administrative services; and |
|
|
|
Teekay LNG Projects Ltd., a Canadian subsidiary of Teekay
Shipping Corporation, for the provision of strategic advisory
and consulting services. |
Please read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Advisory and Administrative Services
Agreements.
Certain of the services that Teekay Shipping Limited will
provide to us and our operating subsidiaries under the services
agreements will be obtained by Teekay Shipping Limited through
subcontracts with a Canadian subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation. The special rules in the Canada Tax Act and various
relevant tax treaties relating to qualifying international
shipping corporations and income from international shipping
operations may provide relief to our operating subsidiaries to
the extent that the services provided to them by Canadian
entities would otherwise result in such operating subsidiaries
being considered to be resident in Canada or to be taxable in
Canada on income from such operations by virtue of carrying on
business in Canada. However, such rules would not apply to us,
as a holding limited partnership, or to our general partner or
unitholders. While we do not believe it to be the case, if the
arrangements we propose to enter into result in our being
considered to carry on business in Canada for purposes of the
Canada Tax Act, our unitholders would be considered to be
carrying on business in Canada and would be required to file
Canadian tax returns and, subject to any relief provided in any
relevant treaty (including, in the case of U.S. Resident
Holders, the Canada-U.S. treaty), would be subject to taxation
in Canada on any income that is considered to be attributable to
the business carried on by us in Canada.
We believe that we can conduct our activities and affairs in a
manner so that our unitholders should not be considered to be
carrying on business in Canada solely as a consequence of the
acquisition, holding, disposition or redemption of our common
units. Consequently, we believe our unitholders should not be
subject to tax filing or other tax obligations in Canada under
the Canada Tax Act. However, although we do not intend to do so,
there can be no assurance that the manner in which we carry on
our activities will not change from time to time as
circumstances dictate or warrant in a manner that may cause our
unitholders to be carrying on business in Canada for purposes of
the Canada Tax Act. Further, the relevant Canadian federal
income tax law may change by legislation or judicial
interpretation and the Canadian taxing authorities may take a
different view than we have of the current law.
It is the responsibility of each unitholder to investigate the
legal and tax consequences, under the laws of pertinent
jurisdictions, including Canada, of his investment in us.
Accordingly, each prospective unitholder is urged to consult,
and depend upon, his tax counsel or other advisor with regard to
those matters. Further, it is the responsibility of each
unitholder to file all state, local and non-U.S., as well as
U.S. federal tax returns, that may be required of him.
198
INVESTMENT IN TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. BY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
PLANS
An investment in us by an employee benefit plan is subject to
additional considerations because the investments of these plans
are subject to the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited
transaction provisions of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (or ERISA), and restrictions imposed
by Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. For these
purposes, the term employee benefit plan includes,
but is not limited to, qualified pension, profit-sharing and
stock bonus plans, Keogh plans, simplified employee pension
plans and tax deferred annuities or IRAs established or
maintained by an employer or employee organization. Among other
things, consideration should be given to:
|
|
|
|
|
whether the investment is prudent under
Section 404(a)(1)(B) of ERISA; |
|
|
|
whether in making the investment, that plan will satisfy the
diversification requirements of Section 404(a)(l)(C) of
ERISA; and |
|
|
|
whether the investment will result in recognition of unrelated
business taxable income by the plan and, if so, the potential
after-tax investment return. |
The person with investment discretion with respect to the assets
of an employee benefit plan is a fiduciary under applicable law
and should determine whether an investment in us is authorized
by the appropriate governing instrument and is a proper
investment for the plan.
Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Internal
Revenue Code prohibit employee benefit plans, and IRAs that are
not considered part of an employee benefit plan, from engaging
in specified transactions involving plan assets with
parties that are parties in interest under ERISA or
disqualified persons under the Internal Revenue Code
with respect to the plan.
In addition to considering whether the purchase of common units
is a prohibited transaction, a fiduciary of an employee benefit
plan should consider whether the plan will, by investing in us,
be deemed to own an undivided interest in our assets, with the
result that our general partner also would be a fiduciary of the
plan and our operations would be subject to the regulatory
restrictions of ERISA, including its prohibited transaction
rules, as well as the prohibited transaction rules of the
Internal Revenue Code.
The Department of Labor regulations provide guidance with
respect to whether the assets of an entity in which employee
benefit plans acquire equity interests would be deemed
plan assets under some circumstances. Under these
regulations, an entitys assets would not be considered to
be plan assets if, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the equity interests acquired by employee benefit plans are
publicly offered securities; i.e., the equity interests are
widely held by 100 or more investors independent of the issuer
and each other, freely transferable and registered under
specified provisions of the federal securities laws; |
|
|
|
the entity is an operating company,
i.e., it is primarily engaged in the production or sale of a
product or service other than the investment of capital either
directly or through a majority owned subsidiary or subsidiaries;
or |
|
|
|
there is no significant investment by benefit plan investors,
which means that less than 25% of the value of each class of
equity interest, disregarding some interests held by our general
partner, its affiliates and any other persons who have the
ability to control our assets or who provide investment advice
with respect to such assets, is held by the employee benefit
plans referred to above, IRAs and other employee benefit plans
not subject to ERISA, including governmental plans. |
Our assets should not be considered plan assets
under these regulations because it is expected that the
investment will satisfy the requirements in the first bullet
point above.
Plan fiduciaries contemplating a purchase of common units should
consult with their own counsel regarding the consequences under
ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code in light of the serious
penalties imposed on persons who engage in prohibited
transactions or other violations.
199
UNDERWRITING
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is acting as sole book-running
manager of this offering and as the representative of the
underwriters named below. Subject to the terms and conditions
stated in the underwriting agreement dated the date of this
prospectus, each underwriter named below has severally agreed to
purchase from us, and we have agreed to sell to that
underwriter, the number of common units set forth opposite the
underwriters name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
Underwriter |
|
Common Units | |
|
|
| |
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
2,250,000 |
|
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
Jefferies & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The business address of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is 388
Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013.
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
underwriters to purchase the common units included in this
offering are subject to approval of legal matters by counsel and
to other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to purchase
all the common units (other than those covered by the
over-allotment option described below) if they purchase any of
the common units.
The underwriters propose to offer some of the common units
directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on
the cover page of this prospectus and some of the common units
to dealers at the public offering price less a concession not to
exceed $0.8745 per common unit. The underwriters may allow,
and dealers may reallow, a concession not to exceed
$0.10 per common unit on sales to other dealers. If all of
the common units are not sold at the initial offering price, the
representative may change the public offering price and the
other selling terms. The representative has advised us that it
does not intend sales to discretionary accounts to exceed 5% of
the total number of our common units offered by them.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for
30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to
900,000 additional common units at the public offering price
less the underwriting discount. The underwriters may exercise
the option solely for the purpose of covering any
over-allotments, if any, in connection with this offering. To
the extent the option is exercised, each underwriter must
purchase a number of additional common units approximately
proportionate to that underwriters initial purchase
commitment.
We, the officers and directors of our general partner, and
Teekay Shipping Corporation have agreed that, for a period of
180 days from the date of this prospectus, we and they will
not, without the prior written consent of the representative,
dispose of or hedge any common units or any securities
convertible into or exchangeable for our common units, except in
limited circumstances. The representative in its sole discretion
may release any of the securities subject to these lock-up
agreements at any time without notice. The representative has no
present intent or arrangement to release any of the securities
subject to these lock-up agreements. The release of any lock-up
is considered on a case by case basis. Factors in deciding
whether to release common units may include the length of time
before the lock-up expires, the number of units involved, the
reason for the requested release, market conditions, the trading
price of our common units, historical trading volumes of our
common units and whether the person seeking the release is an
officer, director or affiliate of us.
200
At our request, the underwriters have reserved 600,000 of the
common units for sale at the initial public offering price to
persons who are directors, officers or employees, or who are
otherwise associated with us, through a directed unit program.
The number of common units available for sale to the general
public will be reduced by the number of directed units purchased
by participants in the program. The common units reserved for
sale under the directed unit program will be subject to
90 day lock-up agreements (or 180 days if they are
sold to officers and directors of our general partner). Any
directed units not purchased will be offered by the underwriters
to the general public on the same basis as all other common
units offered. We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters
against certain liabilities and expenses, including liabilities
under the Securities Act, in connection with the sales of the
directed units.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common units. Consequently, the initial public offering price
for the common units will be determined by negotiations between
our general partner and the representative. Among the factors
considered in determining the initial public offering price will
be our record of operations, our current financial condition,
our future prospects, our markets, the economic conditions in
and future prospects for the industry in which we compete, our
management and currently prevailing general conditions in the
equity securities markets, including current market valuations
of publicly traded companies considered comparable to us. We
cannot assure you, however, that the prices at which the units
will sell in the public market after this offering will not be
lower than the initial public offering price or that an active
trading market in our common units will develop and continue
after this offering.
The common units have been approved for listing on the New York
Stock Exchange, subject to official notice of issuance, under
the symbol TGP. In connection with the listing of
our common units on the New York Stock Exchange, the
underwriters have advised us that they will undertake to sell
round lots of 100 units or more to a minimum of 2,000
beneficial owners.
The following table shows the underwriting discounts and
commissions that we are to pay to the underwriters in connection
with this offering. These amounts are shown assuming both no
exercise and full exercise of the underwriters option to
purchase additional common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid by Teekay LNG | |
|
|
Partners L.P. | |
|
|
| |
|
|
No Exercise | |
|
Full Exercise | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Per common unit
|
|
$ |
1.4575 |
|
|
$ |
1.4575 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
8,745,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,056,750 |
|
We estimate that our portion of the total expenses of the
offering, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions and
structuring fees, will be approximately $3.4 million. The
underwriters have agreed to reimburse us for certain of these
expenses up to $200,000.
We will pay advisory fees equal to an aggregate of $500,000 to
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. for evaluation, analysis and
structuring of our partnership.
In connection with this offering, the representative, on behalf
of the underwriters, may purchase and sell common units in the
open market. These transactions may include short sales,
syndicate covering transactions and stabilizing transactions.
Short sales involve syndicate sales of common units in excess of
the number of units to be purchased by the underwriters in this
offering, which creates a syndicate short position.
Covered short sales are sales of units made in an
amount up to the number of units represented by the
underwriters over-allotment option. In determining the
source of units to close out the covered syndicate short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of units available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase units through
the over-allotment option. Transactions to close out the covered
syndicate short involve either purchases of the common units in
the open market after the distribution has been completed or the
exercise of the over-allotment option. The underwriters may also
make naked short sales of units in excess of the
over-allotment option. The underwriters must close out any naked
short position by purchasing units of common units in the open
market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if
the underwriters are
201
concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of
the units in the open market after pricing that could adversely
affect investors who purchase in this offering. Stabilizing
transactions consist of bids for or purchases of units in the
open market while this offering is in progress.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. Penalty bids
permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a
syndicate member when the representative repurchases units
originally sold by that syndicate member in order to cover
syndicate short positions or make stabilizing purchases.
Any of these activities may have the effect of preventing or
retarding a decline in the market price of the common units.
They may also cause the price of the common units to be higher
than the price that would otherwise exist in the open market in
the absence of these transactions. The underwriters may conduct
these transactions on the New York Stock Exchange or in the
over-the-counter market, or otherwise. If the underwriters
commence any of these transactions they may discontinue them at
any time.
The aggregate maximum compensation that members of the NASD or
independent broker-dealers will receive in connection with the
sale of any securities pursuant to this prospectus and the
registration statement of which it forms a part will not be
greater than 10% plus 0.5% for bona fide due diligence of the
gross proceeds of such sale.
The underwriters have performed investment banking and advisory
services for Teekay Shipping Corporation from time to time for
which they have received customary fees and expenses. The
underwriters may, from time to time, engage in transactions with
and perform services for us and our affiliates in the ordinary
course of their business.
The underwriters have advised us that they do not intend to
place a prospectus on the internet or otherwise engage in an
electronic distribution in connection with this offering, other
than as described below. It is possible that a prospectus in
electronic format may be made available on the websites
maintained by one or more of the underwriters. The
representative may agree to allocate a number of units to
underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders.
The representative will allocate units to underwriters that may
make Internet distributions on the same basis as other
allocations. In addition, units may be sold by the underwriters
to securities dealers who resell units to online brokerage
account holders. Any online distributions will be made in
accordance with procedures for online distributions previously
cleared with the SEC. The representative has also advised us
that it has contracted with Net Roadshow, Inc. to conduct an
internet roadshow in order to provide access to the roadshow to
institutional customers who cannot, or elect not to, attend
roadshow meetings in person.
Because the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
views the common units offered by this prospectus as interests
in a direct participation program, this offering is being made
in compliance with Rule 2810 of the NASDs Conduct
Rules.
We, our general partner and Teekay Shipping Corporation have
agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be
required to make because of any of those liabilities.
202
SERVICE OF PROCESS AND ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITIES
We are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands as a
limited partnership. Our general partner is organized under the
laws of the Marshall Islands as a limited liability company. The
Marshall Islands has a less developed body of securities laws as
compared to the United States and provides protections for
investors to a significantly lesser extent.
Most of the directors and officers of our general partner and
those of our subsidiaries are residents of countries other than
the United States. Substantially all of our and our
subsidiaries assets and a substantial portion of the
assets of the directors and officers of our general partner are
located outside the United States. As a result, it may be
difficult or impossible for United States investors to effect
service of process within the United States upon us, our general
partner, our subsidiaries or the directors and officers of our
general partner or to realize against us or them judgments
obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated
upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of
the United States or any state in the United States. However, we
have expressly submitted to the jurisdiction of the
U.S. federal and New York state courts sitting in the City
of New York for the purpose of any suit, action or proceeding
arising under the securities laws of the United States or any
state in the United States, and we have appointed Watson, Farley
& Williams (New York) LLP to accept service of process
on our behalf in any such action.
Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP, our counsel
as to Marshall Islands law, has advised us that there is
uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Marshall Islands
would (1) recognize or enforce against us, our general
partner or our general partners directors or officers
judgments of courts of the United States based on civil
liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state
securities laws; or (2) impose liabilities against us, our
general partner or our general partners directors and
officers in original actions brought in the Marshall Islands,
based on these laws.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the common units and certain other legal matters
with respect to the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands
will be passed upon for us by our counsel as to Marshall Islands
law, Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP. Certain
other legal matters will be passed upon for us by
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., New York, New York, and by
Perkins Coie LLP, Portland, Oregon. Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. and Perkins Coie LLP may rely on the opinions of Watson,
Farley & Williams (New York) LLP, for all matters
of Marshall Islands law. Certain matters with respect to this
offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Baker Botts
L.L.P., Houston, Texas and Seward & Kissel, LLP,
New York, New York.
EXPERTS
The following financial statements included in this prospectus
have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their reports
thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance
upon such reports given on the authority of such firm as experts
in auditing and accounting:
|
|
|
|
|
The balance sheets of Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. as at
December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the related financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003,
the four months ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months
ended December 31, 2004; |
|
|
|
the financial statements of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. as at and
for the nine months ended December 31, 2004; and |
|
|
|
the balance sheets for Teekay GP L.L.C. and Teekay LNG
Partners L.P. as at November 9, 2004. |
You may contact Ernst & Young LLP at address
700 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia,
V7Y 1C7, Canada.
203
EXPENSES RELATED TO THIS OFFERING
The following table sets forth the main costs and expenses,
other than the underwriting discounts and commissions and
structuring fees, in connection with this offering, which we
will be required to pay.
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee
|
|
$ |
19,234 |
|
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. filing fee
|
|
|
15,680 |
|
New York Stock Exchange listing fee
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
2,550,000 |
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Printing and engraving costs
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Transfer agent fees and other
|
|
|
15,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
All amounts are estimated except the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission registration fee, National Association of
Securities Dealers Inc. filing fee and the New York Stock
Exchange listing fee.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form F-1 regarding the common units. This prospectus does
not contain all of the information found in the registration
statement. For further information regarding us and the common
units offered in this prospectus, you may wish to review the
full registration statement, including its exhibits. The
registration statement, including the exhibits, may be inspected
and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the
SEC at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Room 1024, Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of this
material can also be obtained upon written request from the
Public Reference Section of the SEC at Judiciary Plaza,
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Room 1024,
Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates or from the
SECs web site on the Internet at http://www.sec.gov free
of charge. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further
information on public reference rooms. Our registration
statement can also be inspected and copied at the offices of the
New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York,
New York 10005.
Upon completion of the offering, we will be subject to the
information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and, in accordance therewith, we will be required to file with
the SEC annual reports on Form 20-F within six months of
our fiscal year-end, and provide to the SEC other material
information on Form 6-K. We intend to file our annual
report on Form 20-F earlier than the SEC currently
requires. These reports and other information may be inspected
and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the
SEC or obtained from the SECs website as provided above.
Our website on the Internet is located at
http://www.teekaylng.com, and we expect to make our periodic
reports and other information filed with or furnished to the SEC
available, free of charge, through our website, as soon as
reasonably practicable after those reports and other information
are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Information on our website or any other website is not
incorporated by reference into this prospectus and does not
constitute a part of this prospectus.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt under the Exchange
Act from, among other things, certain rules prescribing the
furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our executive
officers, directors and principal unitholders are exempt from
the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions
contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition,
we will not be required under the Exchange Act to file periodic
reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or
as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are
registered under the Exchange Act, including the filing of
quarterly reports or current reports on Form 8-K. However,
we intend to furnish or make available to our unitholders annual
reports containing our audited consolidated financial statements
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and make available to
our unitholders quarterly reports containing our unaudited
interim financial information for the first three fiscal
quarters of each fiscal year. Our annual report will contain a
detailed statement of
204
any transactions with our general partner or its affiliates, and
of fees, commissions, compensation and other benefits paid or
accrued to our general partner or its affiliates for the fiscal
year completed, showing the amount paid or accrued to each
recipient and the services performed.
INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA
Clarkson Research Studies (or CRS), the research division
of H. Clarkson & Co. Ltd., has provided us
statistical and graphical information contained in this
prospectus and relating to the LNG shipping and the oil tanker
industries. We do not have any knowledge that the information
provided by CRS is inaccurate in any material respect. CRS has
advised us that this information is drawn from its database and
other sources and that: (a) some information in CRSs
database is derived from estimates or subjective judgments;
(b) the information in the databases of other maritime data
collection agencies may differ from the information in
CRSs database; (c) while CRS has taken reasonable
care in the compilation of the statistical and graphical
information and believes it to be accurate and correct, data
compilation is subject to limited audit and validation
procedures, and may accordingly contain errors; (d) CRS,
its agents, officers and employees cannot accept liability for
any loss suffered in consequence of reliance on such information
or in any other manner; and (e) the provision of such
information does not obviate any need to make appropriate
inquiries.
205
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements included in this prospectus which are not historical
facts (including our financial forecast and any other statements
concerning plans and objectives of management for future
operations or economic performance, or assumptions related
thereto) are forward-looking statements. In addition, we and our
representatives may from time to time make other oral or written
statements which are also forward-looking statements. Such
statements include, in particular, statements about our plans,
strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our
business, and the markets in which we operate as described in
this prospectus. In some cases, you can identify the
forward-looking statements by the use of words such as
may, will, could,
should, would, expect,
plan, anticipate, intend,
forecast, believe, estimate,
predict, propose, potential,
continue or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements appear in a number of places and
include statements with respect to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
forecasts of our ability to make cash distributions on the units; |
|
|
|
our future financial condition or results of operations and our
future revenues and expenses; |
|
|
|
|
the repayment of debt; |
|
|
|
|
future LNG and crude oil prices and production; |
|
|
|
planned capital expenditures and availability of capital
resources to fund capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
future supply of, and demand for, LNG and crude oil; |
|
|
|
increases in domestic oil and natural gas consumption; |
|
|
|
forecasts of likely future LNG exporters and importers and of
the accompanying expansion in the LNG global trade routes; |
|
|
|
forecasts of global LNG liquefaction and regasification capacity; |
|
|
|
our ability to maintain long-term relationships with major LNG
importers and exporters, and major crude oil companies; |
|
|
|
our ability to leverage to our advantage Teekay Shipping
Corporations relationships and reputation in the shipping
industry; |
|
|
|
our continued ability to enter into long-term, fixed-rate time
charters with our LNG customers; |
|
|
|
obtaining LNG projects that we or Teekay Shipping Corporation
bid on; |
|
|
|
our ability to maximize the use of our vessels, including the
re-deployment or disposition of vessels no longer under
long-term time charter; |
|
|
|
expected purchases and deliveries of newbuilding vessels; |
|
|
|
expected financial flexibility to pursue acquisitions and other
expansion opportunities; |
|
|
|
our ability to compete successfully for future chartering and
newbuilding opportunities; |
|
|
|
the expected cost of, and our ability to comply with,
governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory
organization standards applicable to our business; |
|
|
|
our anticipated incremental general and administrative expenses
as a public company and our expenses under service agreements
with other affiliates of Teekay Shipping Corporation and for
reimbursements of fees and costs of our general partner; |
|
|
|
the anticipated taxation of our partnership and distributions to
our unitholders; |
|
|
|
estimated future maintenance capital expenditures; |
206
|
|
|
|
|
expected demand in the LNG and crude oil shipping sectors in
general and the demand for our vessels in particular; |
|
|
|
customers increasing emphasis on environmental and safety
concerns; |
|
|
|
continued outsourcing of non-core functions, such as seaborne
transportation, by companies in the oil and energy industry; and |
|
|
|
our business strategy and other plans and objectives for future
operations. |
These and other forward-looking statements are subject to the
risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those risks
discussed in Risk Factors and those risks discussed
in other reports we file with the SEC. The risks, uncertainties
and assumptions involve known and unknown risks and are
inherently subject to significant uncertainties and
contingencies, many of which are beyond our control.
Forward-looking statements are made based upon managements
current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs
concerning future events impacting us and therefore involve a
number of risks and uncertainties, including those risks
discussed in Risk Factors. We caution that
forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual
results could differ materially from those expressed or implied
in the forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after
the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time
to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these
factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such
factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or
combination of factors, may cause actual results to be
materially different from those contained in any forward-looking
statement.
207
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11 |
|
|
|
|
F-12 |
|
|
|
|
F-13 |
|
|
|
|
F-14 |
|
|
|
|
F-15 |
|
|
|
|
F-16 |
|
|
|
|
F-17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30 |
|
|
|
|
F-31 |
|
|
|
|
F-32 |
|
|
|
|
F-33 |
|
|
|
|
F-34 |
|
|
|
|
F-35 |
|
|
|
|
F-36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-47 |
|
|
|
|
F-48 |
|
|
|
|
F-49 |
|
|
|
|
F-50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51 |
|
|
|
|
F-52 |
|
|
|
|
F-53 |
|
|
|
|
F-54 |
|
F-1
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
To facilitate an understanding of the organizational
relationships among the various entities for which financial
statements are included in this prospectus, the following
diagram depicts our organizational structure after giving effect
to the closing of this offering and related transactions.
Financial statements are not included in this prospectus for all
of the following entities.
F-2
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
F-3
INTRODUCTION TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (or the Partnership) is a
Marshall Islands limited partnership recently formed by Teekay
Shipping Corporation as part of its strategy to expand its
operations in the liquified natural gas (or LNG) shipping
sector. The Partnerships fleet was established by Naviera
F. Tapias S.A. (or Tapias), a Spanish company founded in
1991. Teekay Shipping Corporation acquired Tapias on
April 30, 2004 through its subsidiary Teekay Luxembourg
S.a.r.l. (or Luxco), and changed Tapiass name to
Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. (or Teekay Spain). Effective
with the closing of this offering, Teekay Shipping Corporation
will contribute all of the capital stock of Luxco to the
Partnership. The accompanying unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial information gives effect to this contribution, the
offering and related transactions. As a reorganization of
entities under common control, the contribution will be recorded
at Luxcos cost.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of loss for the
year ended December 31, 2004 assumes the offering and
related transactions occurred on January 1, 2004, and the
unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet assumes that the
offering and related transactions occurred on December 31,
2004. Please read Note 1, Basis of Presentation, in the
accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements for further explanation.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles consistent with those
used in, and should be read together with, the following
financial statements and related notes, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
Teekay Spains historical audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes for the four months ended
April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended December 31,
2004; and |
|
|
|
Luxcos historical audited consolidated financial
statements as at and for the nine months ended December 31,
2004. |
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements were
derived as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
for the year ended December 31, 2004, by adjusting
(1) the audited historical consolidated statement of income
of Teekay Spain for the period from January 1, 2004 to
April 30, 2004, and (2) the audited historical
consolidated statement of loss of Luxco for the period from
April 7, 2004 (the date of its incorporation) to
December 31, 2004, which includes the results of Teekay
Spain from May 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004; and |
|
|
|
at December 31, 2004, by adjusting the audited historical
consolidated balance sheet of Luxco as of December 31, 2004. |
The adjustments are based on currently available information and
certain estimates and assumptions; therefore, actual results may
differ from the pro forma adjustments. However, management
believes that the assumptions used provide a reasonable basis
for presenting the significant effects of the offering and the
related transactions, and that the pro forma adjustments give
appropriate effect to the assumptions and are applied in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States in the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements do not
purport to present the Partnerships financial position or
results of operations had the offering and related transactions
to be effected at closing actually been completed at the dates
indicated. Moreover, they do not project the Partnerships
financial position or results of operations for any future date
or period.
F-4
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF LOSS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Teekay | |
|
Teekay | |
|
Offering and | |
|
|
|
|
Luxembourg | |
|
Shipping | |
|
Other | |
|
Teekay LNG | |
|
|
S.a.r.l. | |
|
Spain, S.L. | |
|
Transaction | |
|
Partners L.P. | |
|
|
Historical(1) | |
|
Historical(2) | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for per unit data) | |
VOYAGE REVENUES
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,617 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
$ |
970 |
(3a) |
|
|
37,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,978 |
(3b) |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
(3c) |
|
|
7,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
54,055 |
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
80,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
29,060 |
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
(3,948 |
) |
|
|
42,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(50,485 |
) |
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
24,807 |
(3d) |
|
|
(33,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,065 |
(3e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,143 |
(3f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(764 |
)(3g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366 |
(3h) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
13,519 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,211 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
(78,831 |
) |
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
44,682 |
(3e) |
|
|
(16,139 |
) |
Interest rate swap gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
(4,890 |
)(3f) |
|
|
(905 |
) |
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
(8,016 |
)(3h) |
|
|
(17,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(548 |
)(3i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items
|
|
|
(113,455 |
) |
|
|
(1,722 |
) |
|
|
69,845 |
|
|
|
(45,332 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(84,395 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
65,897 |
|
|
$ |
(2,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners interest in net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
Limited partners interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,287 |
) |
|
Net loss per common unit (basic and diluted) (note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
Net loss per subordinated unit (basic and diluted) (note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
Net loss per unit (basic and diluted) (note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
Weighted average number of common units outstanding (basic and
diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,735 |
|
|
Weighted average number of subordinated units outstanding (basic
and diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,735 |
|
|
Weighted average number of units outstanding (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,469 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects consolidated results of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. from
April 7, 2004 (date of incorporation) to December 31,
2004, which include the results of Teekay Shipping Spain, S.L.
from May 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Reflects results of Teekay Shipping Spain, S.L. from
January 1, 2004 to April 30, 2004. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements.
F-5
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Teekay | |
|
|
|
|
Luxembourg | |
|
Offering and | |
|
Teekay LNG | |
|
|
S.a.r.l. | |
|
Other Transaction | |
|
Partners L.P. | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | |
ASSETS |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
156,410 |
|
|
$ |
209,157 |
(3j) |
|
$ |
21,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,030 |
(3g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,355 |
(3k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,848 |
)(3f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338,542 |
)(3d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,000 |
(3l) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119,355 |
)(3k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,645 |
)(3m) |
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash current
|
|
|
82,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,387 |
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,197 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
249,443 |
|
|
|
(134,848 |
) |
|
|
114,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long term
|
|
|
352,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352,725 |
|
Vessels and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost less accumulated depreciation of $5,829
|
|
|
366,334 |
|
|
|
23,848 |
(3n) |
|
|
390,182 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation of $9,597
|
|
|
629,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
629,569 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts
|
|
|
49,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment
|
|
|
1,045,068 |
|
|
|
23,848 |
|
|
|
1,068,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20,394 |
|
|
|
(7,602 |
)(3h) |
|
|
12,792 |
|
Intangible assets net
|
|
|
178,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,457 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
$ |
(118,602 |
) |
|
$ |
1,766,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS/ PARTNERS EQUITY |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
11,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,411 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
19,222 |
|
|
$ |
(10,982 |
)(3e) |
|
|
8,240 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
|
|
(6,485 |
)(3d) |
|
|
15,883 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases
|
|
|
87,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,687 |
|
Advances from affiliate
|
|
|
454,713 |
|
|
|
(454,713 |
)(3e) |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
(3g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,355 |
(3k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119,355 |
)(3k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
595,401 |
|
|
|
(472,033 |
) |
|
|
123,368 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
764,758 |
|
|
|
(332,057 |
)(3d) |
|
|
432,701 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases
|
|
|
513,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513,361 |
|
Advances from affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,883 |
(3g) |
|
|
9,883 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
|
|
(134,848 |
)(3f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,008,368 |
|
|
|
(929,055 |
) |
|
|
1,079,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders/partners equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(123,002 |
) |
|
|
209,157 |
(3j) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,602 |
)(3h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,000 |
(3l) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,645 |
)(3m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,695 |
(3e) |
|
|
|
|
General partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,848 |
(3n) |
|
|
14,194 |
|
Limited partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders/partners equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(123,002 |
) |
|
|
810,453 |
|
|
|
687,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders/partners
equity (deficit)
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
$ |
(118,602 |
) |
|
$ |
1,766,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements.
F-6
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of loss for the
year ended December 31, 2004 assumes the following
transactions occurred on January 1, 2004, and the unaudited
pro forma consolidated balance sheet as at December 31,
2004 assumes that the following transactions occurred on
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase of Teekay Spain by Teekay Shipping Corporation
through Luxco. On April 30, 2004, Luxco purchased all the
outstanding shares of Tapias from an unrelated party for
$298.2 million in cash plus the assumption of debt and
remaining newbuilding commitments. |
|
|
|
The contribution by Teekay Shipping Corporation to Teekay LNG
Partners L.P. (or the Partnership) of (a) the shares
of, and an aggregate of $465.7 million in notes receivable
(including accrued interest) from, Luxco, and (b) the
shares of the subsidiary that owns the Suezmax tanker the
Granada Spirit, in exchange for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance to Teekay Shipping Corporation of 8,734,572 common
units and 14,734,572 subordinated units of the Partnership; and |
|
|
|
|
the issuance to Teekay GP L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, of the 2% general partner interest
in the Partnership and all of the Partnerships incentive
distribution rights. |
|
|
|
|
An interest bearing loan of $10.0 million and a
non-interest bearing loan of $119.4 million to Teekay Spain
from Teekay Shipping Corporation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The issuance by the Partnership of 6,000,000 common units
to the public at an initial public offering price of $22.00 per
common unit, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds to the
Partnership of $132.0 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporations contribution to us prior to
the closing of this offering of an amount that we used, together
with the loans and existing cash, to repay $338.5 million
of Teekay Spain term loans and to pay $134.8 million to
settle interest rate swaps associated with $769.3 million
of debt of Teekay Spain. As at December 31, 2004, the
amounts of the contribution and loans would have been
$209.1 million and $129.4 million, respectively, and the
amount of existing cash used would have been
$134.8 million. The actual amounts of the Teekay Spain term
loans we repaid and the cost to settle the interest rate swaps
prior to the closing of this offering were $337.3 million
and $143.3 million, respectively. The differences between
the December 31, 2004 amounts and the actual amounts
primarily reflect amortization of the debt and the effect of
interest rate changes since year end. |
|
|
|
|
|
The use of the net proceeds of the initial public offering to
repay the $119.4 million loan from Teekay Shipping
Corporation. |
|
|
|
|
|
The payment by the Partnership of estimated underwriting
commissions, structuring fees and offering expenses of
$12.6 million. |
|
The effect on the unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements of certain of the previously mentioned
transactions is more fully described in Note 3.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are
not necessarily indicative of what the results of operations and
financial position would have been, nor do they purport to
project the Partnerships results of operations for any
future periods as a result of, among other things, the following
items:
|
|
|
(a) The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of loss
includes revenues and expenses relating to marketable
securities, real estate, a yacht and other assets that were sold
by Teekay Spain prior to its acquisition by Teekay Shipping
Corporation on April 30, 2004. The disposition of these
assets resulted in other loss of $11.8 million during the year
ended December 31, 2004. |
F-7
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(b) The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of loss
also includes revenues and expenses associated with one Suezmax
tanker (the Granada Spirit) that was operating in the
spot tanker market prior to its transfer to Teekay Shipping
Corporation in the fourth quarter of 2004. Teekay Shipping
Corporation will contribute this vessel back to the Partnership
at the closing of the offering. The revenue earned by this
vessel will not be representative of the revenue the Partnership
expects to earn from it during 2005, as the vessel will be
absent from our fleet for part of the year and it will be
chartered to Teekay Shipping Corporation from the Partnership at
a fixed, daily time charter rate. If this vessel had been
earning the same fixed charter rate in 2004, as it is expected
to earn during 2005, income from vessel operations would have
been lower by $6.1 million. |
|
|
(c) After the closing of the transactions referred to in
Note 1 above, subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation
will provide certain services to the Partnership and the
Partnerships subsidiaries. These services will include
strategic consulting, advisory, ship management, technical and
administrative services. The services will be valued at a
reasonable, arms-length rate and will include
reimbursement of the reasonable direct or indirect expenses
incurred in providing the services. In addition, the
Partnerships general partner will be reimbursed by the
Partnership for expenses it incurs on behalf of the Partnership.
No adjustment for these incremental costs has been made to the
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements because
(1) the amounts will depend on the level and types of
services provided, (2) the amounts due are not specified or
fixed and (3) the Partnership does not have a reasonable
basis for determining these expenses. |
|
|
(d) The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements do not include the expenses associated with the 2005
Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Partnerships general partner
has not yet determined the types or amounts of awards under the
Plan (other than the amount of awards for non-management
directors) and does not anticipate making any such awards on the
closing of this offering. Consequently, the Partnership does not
have a reasonable basis for determining these expenses. |
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements of Teekay Spain and Luxco referred to above.
2. Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies
The accounting policies followed in preparing the unaudited pro
forma consolidated financial statements are those used by Teekay
Spain and Luxco as set forth in their audited historical
consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this
prospectus.
3. Pro Forma Adjustments and
Assumptions
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements give
pro forma effect to the following:
|
|
|
(a) The purchase of Teekay Spain by Teekay Shipping
Corporation through its subsidiary Luxco as described above in
Note 1. Depreciation expense related to the acquired
vessels has been based upon their estimated fair market values
on the date of acquisition of April 30, 2004
($821.9 million), and a 25-year vessel life for Suezmax
tankers and a 35-year vessel life for LNG carriers. As a result
of the adjusted values of the acquired vessels, depreciation
expense increased by $1.0 million for the four months ended
April 30, 2004. |
|
|
(b) The purchase of Teekay Spain by Teekay Shipping
Corporation through its subsidiary Luxco. Amortization expense
related to the acquired time charter contracts has been based
upon their estimated fair market values on the date of
acquisition of April 30, 2004 ($183.1 million), and a |
F-8
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
weighted-average amortization period of 19.2 years. As a
result, amortization expense increased by $2.0 million for
the four months ended April 30, 2004. |
|
|
(c) The incurrence by the Partnership of estimated
incremental general and administrative expenses of
$1.0 million annually, including costs associated with
annual reports to unitholders, tax return and Schedule K-1
preparation and distribution, investor relations, registrar and
transfer agents fees, incremental director and officer
liability insurance costs and directors compensation. The
Partnership has estimated this amount based on the experience of
its affiliate, Teekay Shipping Corporation, which is a public
company, and discussions with certain advisors. |
|
|
|
(d) The prepayment of $338.5 million of Teekay Spain
term loans with existing cash, proceeds of the contribution by,
and loans from, Teekay Shipping Corporation, which are described
in Notes 3(g), (j) and 3(k). These term loans had a
weighted-average interest rate of 7.9% per annum. Had these term
loans been repaid on January 1, 2004, interest expense
would have decreased by $24.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. Although the Partnership has entered
into a $100 million credit facility in connection with this
offering, it does not anticipate that it will draw on the
facility in connection with the transactions referred to in
Note 1 above. |
|
|
|
(e) The contribution by Teekay Shipping Corporation to the
Partnership of the Luxco shares and the aggregate amount of
$465.7 million of notes receivable (including accrued
interest of $11.0 million) from Luxco as described above in
Note 1. If these Euro-denominated notes receivable from
Luxco had been contributed to the Partnership on January 1,
2004, interest expense would have decreased by
$10.1 million for the period from April 7, 2004 to
December 31, 2004 and foreign exchange loss would have
decreased by $44.7 million. |
|
|
|
(f) The payment of the settlement cost of
$134.8 million under interest rate swaps relating to the
$338.5 million debt repayment described above in
Note 3(d) and $430.8 million of debt not being repaid.
If these interest rate swaps had been repaid on January 1,
2004, the interest rate swap gain would have decreased by
$4.9 million for the year ended 2004, the historical change
in fair value of the interest rate swaps. Had the interest rate
swaps relating to the $430.8 million of debt been repaid on
January 1, 2004, interest expense would have decreased by
$4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. If
these interest rate swaps had been settled on January 1,
2004, we would have funded the settlement with either a
contribution from Teekay Shipping Corporation or a loan from
Teekay Shipping Corporation, which would have subsequently been
contributed to the Partnership. Consequently, the Partnership
would not have recorded interest expense from the funding of
these interest rate swap settlements with debt. |
|
|
|
|
(g) The $10.0 million interest bearing loan from
Teekay Shipping Corporation, which was used prior to the closing
of this offering to partially prepay certain term loans of
Teekay Spain as described in Note 3(d). Assuming this 7.6% fixed
interest rate loan had been made on January 1, 2004,
interest expense would have increased by $0.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
(h) The write-downs of capitalized loan costs upon the
$338.5 million debt repayment described above in
Note 3(d) of $8.0 million and $7.6 million for
the year ended and as at December 31, 2004, respectively.
The amount of the write-downs is the net book value of the
capitalized loan costs on the two term loans repaid. The
corresponding decrease in interest expense from these
write-downs was $0.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. |
|
|
(i) The effect on provision for income taxes from the
incremental general and administrative expenses, prepayment of
debt, settlement of interest rate swaps, the interest bearing
loan and write-off of capitalized loan costs described in
Notes 3(c), (d), (f), (g) and (h). These effects on
provision |
F-9
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
for income taxes are determined by applying a 3.5% effective
income tax rate to the previously mentioned pro forma
adjustments. |
|
|
|
(j) The contribution of $209.1 million by Teekay
Shipping Corporation to Teekay Spain, which would have been used
to prepay certain term loans and settle interest rate swaps of
Teekay Spain as described in Notes 3(d) and (f). The
$209.1 million is determined based on cash existing as at
December 31, 2004. The term loans were repaid and the
interest rate swaps settled in 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(k) The $119.4 million non-interest bearing loan from
Teekay Shipping Corporation, which was used prior to the closing
of this offering to prepay certain term loans of Teekay Spain as
described in Note 3(d). This loan will be repaid with the
net proceeds of this offering. |
|
|
|
|
(l) The receipt by the Partnership of gross proceeds of
$132.0 million from the issuance and sale of
6,000,000 common units to the public (assuming the
underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment option), at an
initial public offering price of $22.00 per common unit. |
|
|
|
|
(m) The payment by the Partnership of underwriting
commissions, structuring fees and other offering expenses of
$12.6 million in connection with the initial
public offering. |
|
|
|
(n) The contribution by Teekay Shipping Corporation to the
Partnership of the shares of the subsidiary that owns the
Suezmax tanker the Granada Spirit, which had a book value
of $23.8 million at December 31, 2004. |
|
|
4. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
(a) Commitments and contingencies of our subsidiary Teekay
Luxembourg S.a.r.l. are set out in the audited historical
consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 contained elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
|
(b) Upon the closing of the transactions referred to in
Note 1 above, the Partnership will enter into an agreement
with Teekay Shipping Corporation to purchase its 100% ownership
interest in Teekay Nakilat Holdings Corporation (or
TNHC), which has contracted to have built three LNG
newbuildings subject to 20-year, fixed-rate time charters. The
Partnership will purchase the interest in TNHC for an estimated
$124.5 million in cash plus the assumption of approximately
$468.0 million in construction-related debt upon delivery
of the first vessel, which is scheduled for the fourth quarter
of 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Subordinated | |
|
All Unit | |
|
|
Unit Holders | |
|
Unit Holders | |
|
Holders | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except number of units and per | |
|
|
unit data) | |
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Net Loss
|
|
$ |
(1,143.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,143.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
29,469,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Net Loss Per Unit
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pro forma weighted average number of units outstanding is
based upon the pro forma issuance of common units and
subordinated units by the Partnership on January 1, 2004.
See Note 1.
F-10
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L.
F-11
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders of
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. (formerly Naviera F. Tapias
S.A.) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2004,
and the related consolidated statements of income (loss),
changes in stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four
months ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four
months ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004 in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
Chartered Accountants |
Vancouver, Canada,
February 28, 2005
F-12
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(See Basis of Presentation Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Four Months | |
|
Eight Months | |
|
|
| |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
April 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) | |
VOYAGE REVENUES
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
45,628 |
|
|
|
63,540 |
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
53,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
14,238 |
|
|
|
23,169 |
|
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
|
29,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(18,109 |
) |
|
|
(34,862 |
) |
|
|
(21,475 |
) |
|
|
(40,560 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
8,431 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
13,426 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) (note 7)
|
|
|
(44,310 |
) |
|
|
(71,502 |
) |
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
(34,149 |
) |
Interest rate swaps gain (loss) (note 13)
|
|
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss) net (note 12)
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
(10,934 |
) |
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items
|
|
|
(128,008 |
) |
|
|
(82,601 |
) |
|
|
(1,722 |
) |
|
|
(57,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-13
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(See Basis of Presentation Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of | |
|
|
U.S. Dollars) | |
ASSETS |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
21,328 |
|
|
$ |
154,203 |
|
Restricted cash current (note 3)
|
|
|
73,894 |
|
|
|
82,387 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
7,197 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
115,049 |
|
|
|
247,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities long term (note 5)
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long term (note 3)
|
|
|
324,144 |
|
|
|
352,725 |
|
Vessels and equipment (note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $5,829
(December 31, 2003 $92,171)
|
|
|
220,643 |
|
|
|
366,334 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation of $4,233 (December 31, 2003
$18,663) (note 3)
|
|
|
256,504 |
|
|
|
397,932 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (note 14)
|
|
|
125,403 |
|
|
|
49,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment
|
|
|
602,550 |
|
|
|
813,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
26,133 |
|
|
|
20,394 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,457 |
|
Goodwill (note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,069,081 |
|
|
$ |
1,651,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
5,881 |
|
|
$ |
11,410 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
8,301 |
|
Advance from affiliate (note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,814 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 7)
|
|
|
53,242 |
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases (note 3)
|
|
|
62,684 |
|
|
|
80,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
123,451 |
|
|
|
234,849 |
|
Long-term debt (note 7)
|
|
|
690,447 |
|
|
|
764,758 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases (note 3)
|
|
|
323,053 |
|
|
|
332,417 |
|
Other long-term liabilities (note 9)
|
|
|
96,415 |
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,233,366 |
|
|
|
1,466,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock (note 10)
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
Additional paid in capital (note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,978 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(165,584 |
) |
|
|
(213,230 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(164,809 |
) |
|
|
184,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
$ |
1,069,081 |
|
|
$ |
1,651,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-14
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(See Basis of Presentation Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Four Months | |
|
Eight Months | |
|
|
| |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
April 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) | |
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,432 |
) |
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
|
$ |
(28,787 |
) |
Non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (recovery)
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
(1,131 |
) |
|
|
(4,398 |
) |
|
Foreign currency exchange loss (gain)
|
|
|
43,314 |
|
|
|
68,897 |
|
|
|
(16,525 |
) |
|
|
31,144 |
|
|
Interest rate swap loss (gain)
|
|
|
71,400 |
|
|
|
(14,715 |
) |
|
|
(3,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
|
|
(15,275 |
) |
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating
activities (note 15)
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
5,935 |
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
(984 |
) |
|
|
(4,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow
|
|
|
20,418 |
|
|
|
18,318 |
|
|
|
14,808 |
|
|
|
7,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
232,829 |
|
|
|
211,089 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
131,368 |
|
Long-term debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(4,289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(28,946 |
) |
|
|
(291,730 |
) |
|
|
(9,899 |
) |
|
|
(60,644 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(6,425 |
) |
|
|
(4,115 |
) |
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
|
|
(64,950 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,575 |
) |
|
|
(41,316 |
) |
Advance from affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,817 |
|
Proceeds from government grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
(16,853 |
) |
|
|
(242,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,370 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow
|
|
|
176,316 |
|
|
|
(277,616 |
) |
|
|
(25,846 |
) |
|
|
95,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(186,755 |
) |
|
|
(133,628 |
) |
|
|
(5,522 |
) |
|
|
(83,703 |
) |
Purchase of Naviera F. Tapias Gas S.A. (net of cash
acquired of $5,140) (note 11b)
|
|
|
(11,039 |
) |
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,689 |
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
3,929 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
|
|
(2,254 |
) |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow
|
|
|
(199,218 |
) |
|
|
262,766 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
39,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
(10,137 |
) |
|
|
143,012 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year
|
|
|
20,344 |
|
|
|
17,860 |
|
|
|
21,328 |
|
|
|
11,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year
|
|
$ |
17,860 |
|
|
$ |
21,328 |
|
|
$ |
11,191 |
|
|
$ |
154,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-15
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(See Basis of Presentation Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Stockholders | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Paid in | |
|
(Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit) | |
|
Loss | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
(Deficit) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) | |
Balance as at December 31, 2001
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,370 |
|
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(113,770 |
) |
|
|
(113,770 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on available-for-sale
securities included in net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Naviera F. Tapias Gas S.A.
(note 11b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,152 |
) |
|
|
(1,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,432 |
) |
|
|
(59,432 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on available-for-sale
securities included in net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(165,584 |
) |
|
$ |
(805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(164,809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gain on available-for-sale
securities included in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of unrelated businesses (note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at April 30, 2004
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145,373 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,787 |
) |
|
|
(28,787 |
) |
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative instruments
included in net income (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on available-for-sale
securities included in net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(72,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revaluation of assets and liabilities (note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,978 |
|
Transfer of Suezmax purchase obligations (note 11d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,961 |
) |
Sale of Granada Spirit (note 11e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
$ |
439,978 |
|
|
$ |
(213,230 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
184,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-16
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
On April 30, 2004, Teekay Shipping Corporation through its
subsidiary, Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l., acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Naviera F. Tapias S.A. and its
subsidiaries (or Tapias) and renamed it Teekay Shipping
Spain S.L. (Teekay Spain or the Company). Teekay
Spain is engaged in the marine transportation of crude oil and
liquefied natural gas (or LNG). Teekay Shipping
Corporation acquired Teekay Spain for $298.2 million in
cash, plus the assumption of debt and remaining newbuilding
commitments. The financial statements for the four months ended
April 30, 2004 reflect the period in 2004 prior to the
acquisition of Teekay Spain. The results for the eight months
ended December 31, 2004 reflect the comprehensive
revaluation of all assets (including intangible assets and
goodwill) and liabilities of the Company at their fair values on
the date of acquisition. The amount of the revaluation was
$440.0 million and is presented as additional paid-in
capital.
Prior to the acquisition, Teekay Spain disposed of three
businesses previously held in subsidiaries and unrelated to the
marine transportation operations purchased by Teekay Shipping
Corporation. The consolidated financial statements do not
include the results of these three unrelated businesses.
Proceeds received by the Company from the sale of these
businesses have been accounted for as an equity contribution. In
addition, immediately preceding the closing of the acquisition,
Teekay Spain sold to its then controlling stockholder marketable
securities, real estate, a yacht and other assets (see Note 12).
The consolidated financial statements include the results of
these assets.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Teekay Spain and its majority-owned subsidiaries but exclude the
results of the three unrelated businesses referred to above. The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. Significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
F-17
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets and
liabilities of the Company at April 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term restricted cash
|
|
$ |
85,092 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
7,415 |
|
Vessels and equipment
|
|
|
821,939 |
|
Restricted cash long term
|
|
|
311,664 |
|
Other assets long-term
|
|
|
15,355 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-charter contracts (weighted average remaining useful life
of 19.2 years)
|
|
|
183,052 |
|
Goodwill non-tax deductible ($3.6 million Suezmax
tanker segment and $35.7 million LNG carrier segment)
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
$ |
1,463,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
98,428 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
668,733 |
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
311,011 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
87,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
1,165,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired (cash consideration)
|
|
$ |
298,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
On November 3, 2004, Teekay LNG Partners, L.P. (the
Partnership) was formed to ultimately own and operate the
LNG and Suezmax crude oil marine transportation businesses
currently conducted by the Company and to undertake an initial
public offering. At the closing of the initial public offering
of the Partnership, which is expected to occur in the first half
of 2005, the shares of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and its
subsidiary, Teekay Spain, and other assets will be contributed
to the Partnership in exchange for a portion of the common units
and all of the subordinated units of the Partnership and the
issuance to Teekay GP L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, of the 2% general partner interest
in the Partnership and all of the Partnerships incentive
distribution rights. This transfer represents a reorganization
of entities under common control and will be recorded at
historical cost.
The consolidated financial statements are stated in
U.S. Dollars because the Company operates in international
shipping markets, the Companys primary economic
environment, which typically utilize the U.S. Dollar as the
functional currency. Transactions involving other currencies
during the year are converted into U.S. Dollars using the
exchange rates in effect at the time of the transactions. At the
balance sheet dates, monetary assets and liabilities that are
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar are
translated to reflect the year-end exchange rates. Resulting
gains or losses are reflected separately in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income (loss).
F-18
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
Operating revenues and expenses |
The Company recognizes revenues from time charters daily over
the term of the charter as the applicable vessel operates under
the charter. The Company does not recognize revenues during days
that the vessel is off-hire. All voyage revenues from voyage
charters are recognized on a percentage of completion method.
The Company uses a discharge-to-discharge basis in determining
percentage of completion for all spot voyages, whereby it
recognizes revenue ratably from when product is discharged
(unloaded) at the end of one voyage to when it is discharged
after the next voyage. The Company does not begin recognizing
voyage revenue until a charter has been agreed to by the
customer and the Company, even if the vessel has discharged its
cargo and is sailing to the anticipated load port on its next
voyage. Estimated losses on voyages are provided for in full at
the time such losses become evident. The consolidated balance
sheets reflect the deferred portion of revenues and expenses,
which will be earned or recognized in subsequent periods.
Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage,
including bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and
unloading expenses, canal tolls, agency fees and commissions.
Vessel operating expenses include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. Voyage expenses are recognized ratably over the
duration of the voyage, and vessel operating expenses are
recognized when incurred.
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
The Company classifies all highly-liquid investments with a
maturity date of three months or less when purchased as cash and
cash equivalents.
Cash interest paid on long-term debt, advances from affiliates
and capital lease obligations during the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months ended
April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended December 31,
2004 totaled $30.2 million, $39.7 million,
$14.7 million and $42.3 million, respectively.
The Companys investments in marketable securities are
classified as available-for-sale securities and are carried at
fair value. Net unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of
other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.
All pre-delivery costs incurred during the construction of
newbuildings, including interest, supervision and technical
costs, are capitalized. The acquisition cost (net of any
government grants received) and all costs incurred to restore
used vessels purchased to the standards required to properly
service the Companys customers are capitalized. The
governmental grants relate to the purchase of certain vessels on
the condition that they are built in Spain.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over a
vessels estimated useful life, less an estimated residual
value. Depreciation is calculated using an estimated useful life
of 25 years for Suezmax tankers and 35 years for LNG
carriers from the date the vessel is delivered from the
shipyard, or a shorter period if regulations prevent the Company
from operating the vessels for 25 years or 35 years,
respectively. Depreciation of vessels and equipment for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months
ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004 totaled $16.9 million,
$21.4 million, $7.8 million and $19.0 million,
respectively. Depreciation and amortization includes
depreciation on all owned vessels and vessels accounted for as
capital leases.
F-19
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
Interest costs capitalized to vessels and equipment for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months
ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004 totaled $14.3 million,
$14.0 million, $2.6 million and $2.6 million,
respectively.
Gains on vessels sold and leased back under capital leases are
deferred and amortized over the remaining estimated useful life
of the vessel. Losses on vessels sold and leased back under
capital lease are recognized immediately when the fair value of
the vessel at the time of sale-leaseback is less than its book
value. In such a case, the Company would recognize a loss in the
amount by which book value exceeds fair value.
Generally, the Company drydocks each LNG carrier and
Suezmax tanker every five years. In addition, a shipping society
classification intermediate survey is performed on the
Companys LNG carriers between the second and third year of
the five-year drydocking period. The Company capitalizes a
substantial portion of the costs incurred during drydocking and
for the survey and amortizes those costs on a straight-line
basis from the completion of a drydocking or intermediate survey
to the estimated completion of the next drydocking. The Company
expenses costs related to routine repairs and maintenance
incurred during drydocking that do not improve or extend the
useful lives of the assets. When significant drydocking
expenditures occur prior to the expiration of the original
amortization period, the remaining unamortized balance of the
original drydocking cost and any unamortized intermediate survey
costs are expensed in the month of the subsequent drydocking.
Amortization of drydocking expenditures for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months ended
April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended December 31,
2004 totaled $0.8 million, $2.0 million,
$0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
The Company reviews vessels and equipment for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of
their carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the
assets are expected to generate over their remaining useful
lives. If vessels and equipment are considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized will equal the amount by which
the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair market value.
Loan costs, including fees, commissions and legal expenses, are
presented as other assets and capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the relevant loan.
Amortization of loan costs is included in interest expense.
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets |
Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are not
amortized, but reviewed for impairment annually or more
frequently as impairment indicators arise. Intangible assets
with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives.
The Companys intangible assets, which consist of
time-charter contracts acquired as part of the purchase of
Teekay Spain, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the time charters.
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce
interest rate risks and does not hold or issue derivative
financial instruments for trading purposes. Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (or SFAS) No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, which was amended in
F-20
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
June 2000 by SFAS No. 138 and in May 2003 by SFAS
No. 149, establishes accounting and reporting standards for
derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Derivative instruments are recorded as other assets or other
long-term liabilities, measured at fair value. Derivatives that
are not hedges or are not designated as hedges are adjusted to
fair value through income. If the derivative is a hedge,
depending upon the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair
value of the derivatives are either offset against the fair
value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments through income,
or recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until the
hedged item is recognized in income. The ineffective portion of
a derivatives change in fair value is immediately
recognized into income (see Note 13).
The income the Company receives with respect to its
Spanish-flagged vessels is subject to tax in Spain at a rate of
35% (see Note 12). The Companys Spanish-flagged
vessels are registered in the Canary Islands Special Ship
Registry. Consequently, the Company is allowed a credit, equal
to 90% of the tax payable on income from the commercial
operation of these vessels, against the tax otherwise payable.
This effectively results in an income tax rate of approximately
3.5% on income from the operation of the Spanish-flagged
vessels. Included in other assets are deferred income tax assets
of $1.7 million and $7.9 million at December 31,
2003 and 2004, respectively. Taxes paid during the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months ended
April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended December 31,
2004 totaled $0.4 million, $1.3 million,
$0.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The
Company accounts for these taxes using the liability method
pursuant to SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes.
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
The Company follows SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for
reporting and displaying comprehensive income (loss) and its
components in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company is engaged in the international marine
transportation of crude oil and LNG through the ownership and
operation of its Suezmax tanker and LNG carrier fleet.
The Company has two reportable segments: its Suezmax tanker
segment and its LNG carrier segment. The Companys Suezmax
tanker segment consists of conventional crude oil tankers
operating either on fixed-rate time-charter contracts or on the
spot market. The Companys LNG carrier segment consists of
LNG carriers subject to fixed-rate time charters. Segment
results are evaluated based on income from vessel operations.
The accounting policies applied to the reportable segments are
the same as those used in the preparation of the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
F-21
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
The following table presents voyage revenues and percentage of
consolidated voyage revenues for customers that accounted for
more than 10% of the Companys consolidated voyage revenues
during the periods presented. Each of the customers is an
international energy company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Four Months | |
|
Eight Months | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
April 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in millions) | |
Customer 1 Suezmax tanker segment
|
|
$ |
42.9 |
|
|
|
(72%) |
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
|
(47%) |
|
|
$ |
15.4 |
|
|
|
(38%) |
|
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
|
(36%) |
|
Customer 2 LNG carrier segment
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
(21) |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
(21) |
|
Customer 3 LNG carrier segment
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
(26) |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(18) |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
(18) |
|
Customer 4 LNG carrier segment
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(13) |
|
|
|
* |
Customer accounted for less than 10% of the Companys
consolidated voyage revenues. |
The following tables present results for these segments for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the four months
ended April 30, 2004 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
54,418 |
|
|
$ |
5,448 |
|
|
$ |
59,866 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
15,789 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,579 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
17,689 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
6,237 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
10,494 |
|
|
$ |
3,744 |
|
|
$ |
14,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
215,139 |
|
|
$ |
596,269 |
|
|
$ |
811,408 |
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
2,385 |
|
|
|
184,370 |
|
|
|
186,755 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003 |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
54,102 |
|
|
$ |
32,607 |
|
|
$ |
86,709 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
4,788 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
20,584 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,760 |
|
|
|
5,630 |
|
|
|
23,390 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
3,854 |
|
|
$ |
19,315 |
|
|
$ |
23,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
209,329 |
|
|
$ |
791,259 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,588 |
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
7,220 |
|
|
|
126,408 |
|
|
|
133,628 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
F-22
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
Four months ended April 30, 2004 |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
24,708 |
|
|
$ |
16,010 |
|
|
$ |
40,718 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
7,196 |
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
|
10,302 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
8,079 |
|
|
$ |
9,807 |
|
|
$ |
17,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
$ |
5,039 |
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
$ |
5,522 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
Eight months ended December 31, 2004 |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
39,730 |
|
|
$ |
43,385 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
12,806 |
|
|
|
7,509 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
12,853 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
2,889 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
7,744 |
|
|
$ |
21,391 |
|
|
$ |
29,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
55,421 |
|
|
$ |
1,423,191 |
|
|
$ |
1,478,612 |
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
48,989 |
|
|
|
34,714 |
|
|
|
83,703 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
A reconciliation of total segment assets to total assets
presented in the consolidated balance sheet is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total assets of all segments
|
|
$ |
1,000,588 |
|
|
$ |
1,478,612 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
|
22,533 |
|
|
|
154,203 |
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
|
|
45,960 |
|
|
|
18,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$ |
1,069,081 |
|
|
$ |
1,651,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Capital Lease Obligations and
Restricted Cash
Capital Leases
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was a party to capital
leases on two LNG carriers, which are structured as
Spanish tax leases. Under the terms of the Spanish
tax leases, the Company will purchase these vessels at the end
of their respective lease terms in 2006 and 2011, both of which
purchase obligations have been fully funded with restricted cash
deposits described below. As at December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004, the weighted-average interest rates implicit in the
Spanish tax leases were 5.6%, 5.4% and 5.7%, respectively. As at
December 31, 2004, the commitments under these capital
leases, including the
F-23
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
purchase obligations, approximated 365.3 million Euros
($497.7 million) (including imputed interest of
61.9 million Euros, or $84.4 million), repayable as
follows:
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
|
|
2005
|
|
77.1 million Euros ($105.0 million) |
2006
|
|
123.2 million Euros ($167.8 million) |
2007
|
|
23.3 million Euros ($31.7 million) |
2008
|
|
24.4 million Euros ($33.3 million) |
2009
|
|
25.6 million Euros ($34.9 million) |
Thereafter
|
|
91.7 million Euros ($124.9 million) |
During 2003, these two LNG carriers were sold for aggregate
proceeds of $399.2 million and leased back on terms described
above. The sale of these vessels resulted in a gain of
$70.5 million, which has been deferred and will be
amortized over the remaining estimated useful life of the
vessels.
Restricted Cash
Under the terms of the Spanish tax leases for our LNG carriers,
the Company is required to have on deposit with financial
institutions an amount of cash that, together with interest
earned on the deposit, will equal the present value of the
remaining amounts owing under the leases (including the
obligations to purchase the LNG carriers at the end of the lease
periods). This amount was 308.6 million Euros
($389.8 million) as at December 31, 2003 and
309.5 million Euros ($421.6 million) as at
December 31, 2004. These cash deposits are restricted to
being used for capital lease payments and have been fully funded
with term loans (see Note 7) and a Spanish government
grant. The interest rates earned on the deposits approximate the
interest rate implicit in the Spanish tax leases. As at
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the weighted-average
interest rates earned on the deposits were 5.6%, 5.4% and 5.3%,
respectively.
The Company also maintains cash on deposit relating to certain
term loans, which cash totaled $8.2 million and
$13.5 million as at December 31, 2003 and 2004,
respectively.
4. Operating Leases
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was a party to
operating leases on four Suezmax tankers. On December 30,
2004, the Company transferred its obligation to purchase these
vessels at the end of their respective lease terms to Teekay
Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (see Note 11(d)). Prior to that time,
the Company accounted for the leases as capital leases. As at
December 31, 2004, the commitments under these operating
leases approximated $54.0 million, payable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
21.0 million |
|
2006
|
|
|
17.9 million |
|
2007
|
|
|
3.9 million |
|
2008
|
|
|
3.9 million |
|
2009
|
|
|
3.8 million |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3.5 million |
|
F-24
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
5. Investments in Marketable
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Approximate | |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Market and | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Losses | |
|
Carrying Values | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities long term
|
|
$ |
1,846 |
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities long term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities long term primarily represents
investments in certain Spanish public companies.
6. Intangible Assets and
Goodwill
As at December 31, 2004, intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
Amortization | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Period | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(years) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-charter contracts
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
182,552 |
|
|
$ |
4,095 |
|
|
$ |
178,457 |
|
All intangible assets were recognized on April 30, 2004
(see Note 1). Aggregate amortization expense of intangible
assets for the eight months ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $6.2 million. Concurrent with the sale of two
Suezmax tankers during 2004, the Company wrote off the remaining
book value of the two related time-charter agreements with an
accumulated amortization of $2.1 million. The
Companys intangible assets are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the time charters.
Amortization of intangible assets for the five years subsequent
to December 31, 2004 is expected to be $9.3 million (2005),
$9.1 million (2006), $9.1 million (2007), $9.1 million
(2008) and $9.1 million (2009).
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 for the Companys
reporting segments, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
LNG | |
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill acquired (note 1)
|
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
|
$ |
35,631 |
|
|
$ |
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
35,631 |
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2022
|
|
$ |
371,334 |
|
|
$ |
343,390 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2025
|
|
|
372,355 |
|
|
|
443,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, including current portion
|
|
|
743,689 |
|
|
|
787,126 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
53,242 |
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
690,447 |
|
|
$ |
764,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
The Company has several term loans outstanding, which, as at
December 31, 2004, totaled $343.4 million of
U.S. Dollar-denominated loans and 325.8 million Euros
($443.7 million) of Euro-denominated loans. A portion of
these loans ($421.6 million) were used to make restricted
cash deposits that fully fund payments under capital leases (see
Note 3).
All Euro-denominated term loans and advances from affiliates
(see Note 8) are revalued at the end of year using the
then-prevailing Euro/U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Due
substantially to this revaluation, the Company recognized
foreign currency exchange losses of $44.3 million,
$71.5 million and $34.1 million in the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003 and the eight months ended
December 31, 2004, and foreign exchange gains of
$18.0 million in the four months ended April 30, 2004.
Interest payments on the U.S. Dollar-denominated term loans
are based on LIBOR (December 31, 2003 1.2%;
December 31, 2004 2.4%) plus a margin. Interest
payments on the Euro-denominated term loans are based on EURIBOR
(December 31, 2003 2.2%; December 31,
2004 2.1%) plus a margin. At December 31, 2003
and 2004, these margins ranged between 0.5% and 1.3%.
The weighted-average effective interest rate for debt
outstanding at December 31, 2004 was 3.7%
(U.S. Dollar-denominated debt) and 3.4% (Euro-denominated
debt). These rates do not reflect the effect of interest rate
swaps that the Company has used to hedge certain of its
floating-rate debt (see Note 13).
The term loans reduce in monthly payments with varying
maturities through 2029. All term loans of the Company are
collateralized by first preferred mortgages on the vessels to
which the loans relate, together with certain other collateral
and guarantees from Teekay Spain.
The aggregate annual long-term debt principal repayments
required to be made for the years subsequent to
December 31, 2004 are $22.4 million (2005),
$16.4 million (2006), $17.6 million (2007),
$19.0 million (2008), $152.0 million (2009) and
$559.7 million (thereafter).
The Companys term loans contain restrictive covenants
including, in some cases, requirements to maintain restricted
cash deposits, unencumbered liquidity and minimum tangible net
worth.
8. Advance from Affiliate
In December 2004, the Companys direct parent company,
Teekay Spain, S.L. (a subsidiary of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l.),
made a loan to it totaling 82.1 million Euros
($111.8 million). These funds will be used to prepay debt
associated with two of the Companys LNG carriers. This
unsecured note bears interest based on EURIBOR plus a margin of
2.09%. As at December 31, 2004, the weighted-average
interest rate outstanding on the loan was 4.4%. For the eight
months ended December 31, 2004, total interest expense
incurred on the loan was 0.1 million Euros
($0.1 million). The loan is repayable on the earlier of
December 31, 2009 and 30 business days from demand.
F-26
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
9. Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
Carrying amounts of all financial instruments approximate fair
market value at the applicable date.
The estimated fair market value of the Companys financial
instruments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
$ |
420,571 |
|
|
$ |
420,571 |
|
|
$ |
589,315 |
|
|
$ |
589,315 |
|
Long-term debt (including capital lease obligations)
|
|
|
1,129,426 |
|
|
|
1,129,426 |
|
|
|
1,200,499 |
|
|
|
1,200,499 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 13)
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
96,415 |
|
|
|
96,415 |
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
10. Capital Stock
The authorized capital stock of Teekay Spain at
December 31, 2003 and 2004 was 18,425 shares of common
stock, with a par value of 60.10 Euros per share. As at
December 31, 2003 and 2004, Teekay Spain had
18,425 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
11. Related Party
Transactions
(a) Payments made by the Company to companies owned by
former members of the Companys board of directors for
consulting services and miscellaneous office expenses for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 totaled
$0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
(b) On December 20, 2002, the Company purchased
Naviera F. Tapias Gas S.A. (or NFT Gas) from
the controlling stockholder of the Company for 20.0 million
Euros ($21.0 million). All assets and liabilities of NFT Gas
have been presented at their historical values. The excess of
the amount paid over the net assets of NFT Gas on the date of
acquisition ($20.7 million) was accounted for as an equity
distribution.
(c) In December 2004, the Companys direct parent
company, Teekay Spain, S.L., made an interest-bearing loan to
the Company totaling 82.1 million Euros
($111.8 million) (see Note 8).
(d) In December 2004, the Company transferred its
obligation to purchase four Suezmax tankers at the end of their
respective lease terms to Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. The
resulting loss of $44.0 million has been accounted for as
an equity distribution.
(e) In December 2004, the Company sold the Granada
Spirit (a single-hulled Suezmax tanker) to a subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation for $26.5 million. The
resulting gain on sale of $4.9 million has been accounted
for as an equity contribution. This sale was done in connection
with a drydocking and re-flagging of the vessel. The
Companys subsidiary operated the vessel on the spot market
until it was sold.
F-27
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
12. Other Income
(Loss) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Four Months | |
|
Eight Months | |
|
|
| |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
April 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,428 |
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of other assets (note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax recovery (expense)
|
|
|
(2,164 |
) |
|
|
(3,033 |
) |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
$ |
617 |
|
|
$ |
(10,934 |
) |
|
$ |
3,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities
The Company uses derivatives only for hedging purposes.
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was committed to the
following interest rate swap agreements related to its LIBOR and
EURIBOR based debt, whereby certain of the Companys
floating-rate debt was swapped with fixed-rate obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Fixed | |
|
|
Interest Rate | |
|
Principal | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
Index | |
|
Amount | |
|
Term | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(years) | |
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps(2)
|
|
|
LIBOR |
|
|
$ |
328,459 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
6.7% |
|
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps(3)
|
|
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
|
442,401 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes the margin the Company pays on its floating-rate debt
(see Note 7). |
|
(2) |
Principal amount reduces monthly to zero by the maturity dates
of the swap agreements. |
|
(3) |
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros
($95.5 million) by the maturity dates of the swap
agreements. |
Although these interest rate swaps are being used to hedge the
interest rate risk on certain debt described in Note 7, the
Company had not designated them as hedges under current
U.S. accounting guidelines prior to April 30, 2004.
Consequently, any change in fair value of these swaps prior to
April 30, 2004 was recorded in earnings of the period in
which the change in value occurred. During the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003, and the four months ended
April 30, 2004, the Company incurred a loss of
$71.4 million and gains of $14.7 million and
$4.0 million, respectively, due to the change in fair value
of its interest rate swaps. Subsequent to April 30, 2004,
changes in the fair value of the designated interest rate swaps
(cash flow hedges) are recognized in other comprehensive income
until the hedged item is recognized in income. The ineffective
portion of a derivatives change in fair value is
immediately recognized into income.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of
non-performance by the counter parties to the interest rate swap
agreements; however, counterparties to these agreements are
major financial institutions and the Company considers the risk
of loss due to nonperformance to be minimal. The Company
requires no collateral from these institutions.
F-28
TEEKAY SHIPPING SPAIN S.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of
U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
14. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was committed to the
construction of two Suezmax tankers scheduled for delivery in
March 2005 and July 2005, at a total cost of approximately
$95.1 million, excluding capitalized interest. As at
December 31, 2004, payments made towards these commitments
totaled $14.3 million, excluding capitalized interest and
miscellaneous construction costs. Long-term financing
arrangements existed for $42.8 million of the unpaid cost
of these vessels. The Company intends to sell upon delivery the
vessel to which the remaining unpaid amount of
$38.0 million relates, but may in the interim finance the
remaining unpaid amount through incremental debt or equity or
surplus cash balances, or a combination thereof (see
Note 16). As at December 31, 2004, the remaining
payments required to be made under the newbuilding contracts
were $80.8 million in 2005.
|
|
15. |
Change in Non-Cash Working Capital Items Related to Operating
Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Four Months | |
|
Eight Months | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
(493 |
) |
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
$ |
2,123 |
|
|
$ |
(4,125 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(646 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(2,156 |
) |
|
|
(727 |
) |
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
5,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
911 |
|
|
$ |
5,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Subsequent Events
In early 2005, the Company completed the sale of the Santiago
Spirit (a newly constructed, double-hulled Suezmax tanker
delivered in March 2005) to a subsidiary of Teekay Shipping
Corporation not organized in Spain for $70.0 million.
F-29
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L.
F-30
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholder of
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statement
of loss, changes in stockholder deficit and cash flows for the
nine months ended December 31, 2004. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2004, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for the nine
months ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
Chartered Accountants |
Vancouver, Canada,
February 28, 2005
F-31
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF LOSS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of | |
|
|
U.S. Dollars) | |
VOYAGE REVENUES
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
54,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
|
29,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (notes 6 and 7)
|
|
|
(50,485 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
13,519 |
|
Foreign currency exchange loss (note 6)
|
|
|
(78,831 |
) |
Other income net (note 11)
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items
|
|
|
(113,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(84,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-32
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of | |
|
|
U.S. dollars) | |
ASSETS (note 7) |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
156,410 |
|
Restricted cash current (note 4)
|
|
|
82,387 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,197 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
249,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long term (note 4)
|
|
|
352,725 |
|
Vessels and equipment (note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $5,829
|
|
|
366,334 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation of $9,597 (note 4)
|
|
|
629,569 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (note 13)
|
|
|
49,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment
|
|
|
1,045,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20,394 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 5)
|
|
|
178,457 |
|
Goodwill (note 5)
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER DEFICIT |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
11,411 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
19,222 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 6)
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases (note 4)
|
|
|
87,687 |
|
Advances from affiliate (note 7)
|
|
|
454,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
595,401 |
|
Long-term debt (note 6)
|
|
|
764,758 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases (note 4)
|
|
|
513,361 |
|
Other long-term liabilities (note 9)
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,008,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder deficit
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock (note 9)
|
|
|
180 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(79,504 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholder deficit
|
|
|
(123,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholder deficit
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-33
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of | |
|
|
U.S. dollars) | |
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for)
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(84,395 |
) |
Non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
|
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(4,398 |
) |
|
Foreign currency exchange loss
|
|
|
77,705 |
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
(5,125 |
) |
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating
activities (note 14)
|
|
|
7,719 |
|
Expenditures for drydocking
|
|
|
(4,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow
|
|
|
10,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
131,368 |
|
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(60,644 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(64,950 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(41,316 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
180 |
|
Advances from affiliate
|
|
|
409,141 |
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
19,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow
|
|
|
393,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(83,703 |
) |
Purchase of Teekay Shipping Spain, S.L. net of cash acquired of
$11,191 (note 2)
|
|
|
(286,993 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
123,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow
|
|
|
(247,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
156,410 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
|
|
$ |
156,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-34
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Stockholder | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Loss | |
|
Loss | |
|
Deficit | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as at April 7, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,395 |
) |
|
|
(84,395 |
) |
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments (note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
|
(57,444 |
) |
|
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative instruments
included in net loss (note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(128,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of Granada Spirit (note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
(79,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(123,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-35
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
On April 30, 2004, Teekay Shipping Corporation through its
subsidiary, Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l., acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Naviera F. Tapias S.A. and its
subsidiaries (or Tapias) and renamed it Teekay Shipping
Spain S.L. (or Teekay Spain). Teekay Spain is engaged in
the marine transportation of crude oil and liquefied natural gas
(or LNG). Teekay Shipping Corporation acquired Teekay
Spain for $298.2 million in cash, plus assumption of debt
and remaining newbuilding commitments.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l., which was incorporated under the
laws of Luxembourg on April 7, 2004, and its wholly owned
or controlled subsidiaries (collectively, the Company).
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. Significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
On November 3, 2004, Teekay LNG Partners, L.P. (the
Partnership) was formed to ultimately own and operate the
LNG and Suezmax crude oil marine transportation businesses
currently conducted by the Company and to undertake an initial
public offering. At the closing of the initial public offering
of the Partnership, which is expected to occur in the first half
of 2005, the shares of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and its
subsidiary, Teekay Spain, and other assets will be contributed
to the Partnership in exchange for a portion of the common units
and all of the subordinated units of the Partnership and the
issuance to Teekay GP L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation, of the 2% general partner interest
in the Partnership and all of the Partnerships incentive
distribution rights. This transfer represents a reorganization
of entities under common control and will be recorded at
historical cost.
The consolidated financial statements are stated in U.S. Dollars
because the Company operates in international shipping markets,
the Companys primarily economic environment, which
typically utilize the U.S. Dollar as the functional currency.
Transactions involving other currencies during the year are
converted into U.S. Dollars using the exchange rates in effect
at the time of the transactions. At the balance sheet date,
monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. Dollar are translated to reflect
the year-end exchange rates. Resulting gains or losses are
reflected separately in the accompanying consolidated statement
of loss.
|
|
|
Operating revenues and expenses |
The Company recognizes revenues from time charters daily over
the term of the charter as the applicable vessel operates under
the charter. The Company does not recognize revenue during days
that the vessel is off-hire. All voyage revenues from voyage
charters are recognized on a percentage of completion method.
The Company uses a discharge-to-discharge basis in determining
percentage of completion for all spot voyages, whereby it
recognizes revenue ratably from when product is discharged
(unloaded) at the end of one voyage to when it is
discharged after the next voyage. The Company does not begin
recognizing voyage revenue until a charter has been agreed to by
the customer and the Company, even if the vessel has discharged
its cargo and is sailing to the anticipated load port on its next
F-36
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
voyage. Estimated losses on voyages are provided for in full at
the time such losses become evident. The consolidated balance
sheet reflects the deferred portion of revenues and expenses,
which will be earned or recognized in subsequent periods.
Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage,
including bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and
unloading expenses, canal tolls, agency fees and commissions.
Vessel operating expenses include crewing, repairs and
maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication
expenses. Voyage expenses are recognized ratably over the
duration of the voyage, and vessel operating expenses are
recognized when incurred.
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
The Company classifies all highly-liquid investments with a
maturity date of three months or less when purchased as cash and
cash equivalents.
Cash interest paid during the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 totaled $42.3 million.
All pre-delivery costs incurred during the construction of
newbuildings, including interest, supervision and technical
costs, are capitalized. The acquisition cost (net of any
government grants received) and all costs incurred to restore
used vessels purchased to the standards required to properly
service the Companys customers are capitalized. The
governmental grants relate to the purchase of certain vessels on
the condition that they are built in Spain.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over a
vessels estimated useful life, less an estimated residual
value. Depreciation is calculated using an estimated useful life
of 25 years for Suezmax tankers and 35 years for LNG
carriers from the date the vessel is delivered from the
shipyard, or a shorter period if regulations prevent the Company
from operating the vessels for 25 years or 35 years,
respectively. Depreciation of vessels and equipment for the nine
months ended December 31, 2004 was $19.0 million.
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation on all owned
vessels and vessels accounted for as capital leases.
Interest costs capitalized to vessels and equipment for the nine
months ended December 31, 2004 were $2.6 million.
Gains on vessels sold and leased back under capital leases are
deferred and amortized over the remaining estimated useful life
of the vessel. Losses on vessels sold and leased back under
capital leases are recognized immediately when the fair value of
the vessel at the time of sale-leaseback is less than its book
value. In such case, the Company would recognize a loss in the
amount by which book value exceeds fair value.
Generally, the Company drydocks each LNG carrier and Suezmax
tanker every five years. In addition, a shipping society
classification intermediate survey is performed on the
Companys LNG carriers between the second and third year of
the five-year drydocking period. The Company capitalizes a
substantial portion of the costs incurred during drydocking and
for the survey and amortizes those costs on a straight-line
basis from the completion of a drydocking or intermediate survey
to the estimated completion of the next drydocking. The Company
expenses costs related to routine repairs and maintenance
incurred during drydocking that do not improve or extend the
useful lives of the assets. When significant drydocking
expenditures occur prior to the expiration of the original
amortization period, the remaining unamortized balance of the
original drydocking cost and any unamortized intermediate survey
F-37
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
costs are expensed in the month of the subsequent drydocking.
Amortization of drydocking expenditures for the nine months
ended December 31, 2004 was $1.1 million.
The Company reviews vessels and equipment for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of
their carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the
assets are expected to generate over their remaining useful
lives. If vessels and equipment are considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized will equal the amount by which
the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair market value.
Loan costs, including fees, commissions and legal expenses are
presented as other assets and capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the relevant loan.
Amortization of loan costs is included in interest expense.
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets |
Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are not
amortized, but reviewed for impairment annually or more
frequently if impairment indicators arise. Intangible assets
with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives.
The Companys intangible assets, which consist of
time-charter contracts acquired as part of the purchase of
Teekay Spain, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the time charters.
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce
interest rate risk and does not hold or issue derivative
financial instruments for trading purposes. Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (or SFAS) No. 133.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
which was amended in June 2000 by SFAS No. 138 and
in May 2003 by SFAS No. 149, establishes accounting
and reporting standards for derivatives instruments and hedging
activities.
Derivative instruments are recorded as other assets or other
long-term liabilities, measured at fair value. Derivatives that
are not hedges or are not designated as hedges are adjusted to
fair value through income. If the derivative is a hedge,
depending upon the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair
value of the derivatives are either offset against the fair
value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments through income,
or recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until
the hedged item is recognized in income. The ineffective portion
of a derivatives change in fair value is immediately
recognized into income (see Note 12).
The income the Company receives with respect to its
Spanish-flagged vessels is subject to tax in Spain at a rate of
35% (see Note 11). The Companys Spanish-flagged
vessels are registered in the Canary Islands Special Ship
Registry. Consequently, the Company is allowed a credit, equal
to 90% of the tax payable on income from the commercial
operation of these vessels, against the tax otherwise payable.
This effectively results in an income tax rate of approximately
3.5% on income from the operation of the Spanish-flagged
vessels. Included in other assets are deferred income tax assets
of $7.9 million at December 31, 2004. Taxes paid
during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2004
totaled $2.0 million. The Company accounts for these taxes
using the liability method pursuant to SFAS No. 109,
F-38
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
Accounting for Income Taxes. The Company may also pay a
minimal amount of tax in Luxembourg, resulting from interest
earned on multi-jurisdictional inter-company loans.
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
The Company follows SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for
reporting and displaying comprehensive income (loss) and
its components in the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
2. |
Acquisition of Teekay Shipping Spain, S.L. |
On April 30, 2004, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Tapias and renamed it Teekay Shipping
Spain S.L. The Company acquired Teekay Spain for
$298.2 million in cash, plus the assumption of debt and
remaining newbuilding commitments. Management believes the
acquisition of the Teekay Spain business has provided the
Company with a strategic platform from which to expand its
presence in the LNG shipping sector and immediate access to
reputable LNG operations. The Company anticipates this will
benefit it when bidding on future LNG projects. These benefits
contributed to the recognition of goodwill. Teekay Spains
results of operations have been consolidated with the
Companys results commencing May 1, 2004.
As at December 31, 2004, the Companys LNG fleet
consisted of four vessels. All four vessels were contracted
under long-term, fixed-rate time charters to international
Spanish energy companies. As at December 31, 2004, the
Companys conventional crude oil tanker fleet consisted of
four Suezmax tankers and two Suezmax newbuildings scheduled for
delivery in 2005. All four Suezmax tankers and one of the
newbuildings were contracted under long-term, fixed-rate time
charters with a major Spanish oil company. One of the
newbuildings will be sold on delivery (see Note 15).
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets and
liabilities of Tapias at April 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term restricted cash
|
|
$ |
85,092 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
7,415 |
|
Vessels and equipment
|
|
|
821,939 |
|
Restricted cash long term
|
|
|
311,664 |
|
Other assets long-term
|
|
|
15,355 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-charter contracts (weighted average remaining useful life
of 19.2 years)
|
|
|
183,052 |
|
Goodwill non-tax deductible ($3.6 million
fixed-rate tanker segment, and $35.7 million fixed-rate LNG
segment)
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
$ |
1,463,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
98,428 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
668,733 |
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
311,011 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
87,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
1,165,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired (cash consideration)
|
|
$ |
298,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
The Company is engaged in the international marine
transportation of crude oil and LNG through the ownership and
operation of its Suezmax tanker and LNG carrier fleet.
The Company has two reportable segments: its Suezmax tanker
segment and its LNG carrier segment. The Companys Suezmax
tanker segment consists of conventional crude oil tankers
operating either on fixed-rate time-charter contracts or on the
spot market. The Companys LNG carrier segment consists of
LNG carriers subject to fixed-rate time-charter contracts.
Segment results are evaluated based on income from vessel
operations. The accounting policies applied to the reportable
segments are the same as those used in the preparation of the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
Four customers, all international energy companies, accounted
for 36% ($29.7 million Suezmax tanker segment),
21% ($17.3 million LNG carrier segment), 18%
($15.2 million LNG carrier segment), and 13%
($10.8 million LNG carrier segment) of the
Companys consolidated voyage revenues during the nine
months ended December 31, 2004. No other customer accounted
for more than 10% of the Companys consolidated voyage
revenues during the nine months ended December 31, 2004.
The following table presents results for these segments for the
nine months ended December 31, 2004. The table
includes the results of Teekay Spain following its acquisition
on April 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
Nine months ended December 31, 2004 |
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Voyage revenues
|
|
$ |
39,730 |
|
|
$ |
43,385 |
|
|
$ |
83,115 |
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
12,806 |
|
|
|
7,509 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
12,853 |
|
|
|
26,275 |
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations
|
|
$ |
7,694 |
|
|
$ |
21,366 |
|
|
$ |
29,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31, 2004.
|
|
$ |
287,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,423,191 |
|
|
$ |
1,710,249 |
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment
|
|
|
48,989 |
|
|
|
34,714 |
|
|
|
83,703 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect
general and administrative expenses (allocated to each segment
based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
A reconciliation of total segment assets to total assets
presented in the consolidated balance sheet is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
Total assets of all segments
|
|
$ |
1,710,249 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
156,410 |
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
|
|
18,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$ |
1,885,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
4. |
Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash |
Suezmax Tankers. As at December 31, 2004, the
Company was a party to capital leases on four Suezmax tankers.
Under the terms of the lease arrangements which
include the Companys contractual right to full operation
of the vessels pursuant to bareboat charters the
Company is required to purchase these vessels at the end of
their respective lease terms for a fixed price. As at
December 31, 2004, the commitments under these capital
leases, including the purchase obligations, approximated
$221.2 million (including imputed interest of
$33.6 million), repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
21.0 million |
|
2006
|
|
|
145.8 million |
|
2007
|
|
|
3.9 million |
|
2008
|
|
|
3.9 million |
|
2009
|
|
|
3.8 million |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
42.8 million |
|
LNG Carriers. As at December 31, 2004, the Company
was a party to capital leases on two LNG carriers, which are
structured as Spanish tax leases. Under the terms of
the Spanish tax leases, the Company will purchase these vessels
at the end of their respective lease terms in 2006 and 2011,
both of which purchase obligations have been fully funded with
restricted cash deposits described below. As at
December 31, 2004, the weighted-average interest rate
implicit in the Spanish tax leases was 5.7%. As at
December 31, 2004, the commitments under these capital
leases, including the purchase obligations, approximated
365.3 million Euros ($497.6 million) (including
imputed interest of 61.9 million Euros, or
$84.4 million), repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
77.1 million Euros ($105.0 million) |
|
2006
|
|
|
123.2 million Euros ($167.8 million) |
|
2007
|
|
|
23.3 million Euros ($31.7 million) |
|
2008
|
|
|
24.4 million Euros ($33.3 million) |
|
2009
|
|
|
25.6 million Euros ($34.9 million) |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
91.7 million Euros ($124.9 million) |
|
During 2003, these two LNG carriers were sold for aggregate
proceeds of $399.2 million and leased back on terms described
above. The sale of these vessels resulted in a gain of
$70.5 million, which has been deferred and will be
amortized over the remaining estimated useful life of the
vessels.
Under the terms of the Spanish tax leases for our LNG carriers,
the Company is required to have on deposit with financial
institutions an amount of cash that, together with interest
earned on the deposit, will equal the remaining amounts owing
under the leases (including the obligations to purchase the LNG
carriers at the end of the lease periods). This amount was
309.5 million Euros ($421.6 million) as at
December 31, 2004. These cash deposits are restricted to
being used for capital lease payments and have been fully funded
with term loans (see Note 6) and a Spanish government
grant. The interest rates earned on the deposits approximates
the interest rate implicit in the Spanish tax leases. As at
December 31, 2004, the weighted-average interest rate
earned on the deposits was 5.3%.
F-41
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
The Company also maintains cash on deposit in respect of certain
term loans, which cash totalled $13.5 million as at
December 31, 2004.
5. Intangible Assets and
Goodwill
As at December 31, 2004, intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
Amortization | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Period | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(years) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-charter contracts
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
182,552 |
|
|
$ |
4,095 |
|
|
$ |
178,457 |
|
All intangible assets were recognized on April 30, 2004
(see Note 2). Aggregate amortization expense of intangible
assets for the nine months ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $6.2 million. Concurrent with the sale of two
Suezmax tankers during 2004, the Company wrote off the remaining
book value of the two related time-charter agreements with an
accumulated amortization of $2.1 million. The
Companys intangible assets are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the time charters.
Amortization of intangible assets for the five years subsequent
to December 31, 2004 is expected to be $9.3 million
(2005), $9.1 million (2006), $9.1 million (2007),
$9.1 million (2008) and $9.1 million (2009).
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine
months ended December 31, 2004 for the Companys
reporting segments, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker | |
|
LNG Carrier | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as of April 7, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill acquired (note 2)
|
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
|
$ |
35,631 |
|
|
$ |
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
|
$ |
35,631 |
|
|
$ |
39,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2022
|
|
$ |
343,390 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2025
|
|
|
443,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total, including current portion
|
|
|
787,126 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
764,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has several term loans outstanding, which, as at
December 31, 2004, totaled $343.4 million of
U.S. Dollar-denominated loans and 325.8 million Euros
($443.7 million) of Euro-denominated loans. A portion
of the loans ($421.6 million) were used to make restricted
cash deposits that fully fund payments under capital leases (see
Note 4).
All Euro-denominated term loans and advances from affiliates
(see Note 7) are revalued at the end of each period using
the then prevailing Euro/ U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Due
substantially to this
F-42
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
revaluation, the Company recognized foreign currency exchange
losses of $78.8 million in the nine months ended
December 31, 2004.
Interest payments on the U.S. Dollar-denominated term loans
are based on LIBOR (December 31, 2004 2.4%)
plus a margin. Interest payments on the Euro-denominated term
loans are based on EURIBOR (December 31, 2004
2.1%) plus a margin. At December 31, 2004, these margins
ranged between 0.5% and 1.3%. The weighted-average effective
interest rate for debt outstanding at December 31, 2004 was
3.7% (U.S. Dollar-denominated debt) and 3.4%
(Euro-denominated debt). These rates do not reflect the effect
of related interest rate swaps that the Company has used to
hedge certain of its floating-rate debt (see Note 12).
The term loans reduce in monthly payments with varying
maturities through 2025. All term loans of the Company are
collateralized by first preferred mortgages on the vessels to
which the loans relate, together with certain other collateral
and guarantees from Teekay Spain.
The aggregate annual long-term debt principal repayments
required to be made for the years subsequent to
December 31, 2004 are $22.4 million (2005),
$16.4 million (2006), $17.6 million (2007),
$19.0 million (2008), $152.0 million (2009) and
$559.7 million (thereafter).
The Companys term loans contain restrictive covenants
including, in some cases, requirements to maintain restricted
cash deposits, unencumbered liquidity and minimum tangible net
worth.
7. Advances from Affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
Euro-denominated Demand Promissory Notes
|
|
$ |
371,073 |
|
Euro-denominated Participating Loan
|
|
|
94,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
465,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys parent company, Teekay Shipping Corporation,
has made several loans to it totaling 256.4 million Euros
($349.2 million) for the purchase of Teekay Spain (see
Note 2). Subsequent to the purchase of Teekay Spain, Teekay
Shipping Corporation made a loan totaling 77.4 million
Euros ($105.5 million) to the Company. These funds will be
used to prepay debt associated with two of the Companys
LNG carriers. The Demand Promissory Notes bear interest based on
EURIBOR plus margins ranging from 1.7% to 2.5%. As at
December 31, 2004, the weighted-average interest rate
outstanding on the Companys Demand Promissory Notes was
4.0%. The Participating Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of
5.4% plus a variable component (not exceeding 6%) based on the
Companys net cash flow. As at December 31, 2004, the
interest rate outstanding on the Companys Participating
Loan was 5.4%. For the nine months ended December 31, 2004,
total interest expense incurred on the Demand Promissory Notes
and the Participating Loan was 8.1 million Euros
($10.1 million). The Demand Promissory Notes, which are
collateralized by the Companys assets, are repayable upon
the earlier of December 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009
for the 77.4 million Euro loan) and 30 business days
from demand. The Participating Loan, which is unsecured, is
repayable on April 28, 2014.
F-43
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
8. Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
Carrying amounts of all financial instruments approximate fair
market value at the applicable date.
The estimated fair value of the Companys financial
instruments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
$ |
591,522 |
|
|
$ |
591,522 |
|
Long-term debt (including capital lease obligations)
|
|
|
1,388,174 |
|
|
|
1,388,174 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
|
|
134,848 |
|
9. Capital Stock
The authorized capital stock of the Company at December 31,
2004 was 1,500 shares of common stock, with a par value of
100.00 Euros per share. As at December 31, 2004, the
Company had 1,500 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
10. Related Party
Transactions
In December 2004, a subsidiary of the Company sold the
Granada Spirit (a single-hulled Suezmax tanker) to a
subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation for
$26.5 million. The resulting gain on sale of
$4.9 million has been accounted for as an equity
contribution. This sale was done in connection with a drydocking
and re-flagging of the vessel. The Companys subsidiary
operated the vessel on the spot market until it was sold.
11. Other Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
$ |
3,428 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(967 |
) |
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
12. Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities
The Company uses derivatives only for hedging purposes.
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was committed to the
following interest rate swap agreements related to its LIBOR and
EURIBOR based debt, whereby certain of the Companys
floating-rate debt was swapped with fixed-rate obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Fixed | |
|
|
Rate |
|
Principal | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
Index |
|
Amount | |
|
Term | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(years) | |
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps(2)
|
|
LIBOR |
|
$ |
328,459 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps(3)
|
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
442,401 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes the margin the Company pays on its floating-rate debt
(see Note 6). |
|
(2) |
Principal amount reduces monthly to zero by the maturity dates
of the swap agreements. |
|
(3) |
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros
($95.5 million) by the maturity dates of the swap
agreements. |
Changes in the fair value of the designated interest rate swaps
(cash flow hedges) are recognized in other comprehensive income
until the hedged item is recognized in income. The ineffective
portion of a derivatives change in fair value is
immediately recognized into income.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of
non-performance by the counter parties to the interest rate swap
agreements; however, counterparties to these agreements are
major financial institutions and the Company considers the risk
of loss due to nonperformance to be minimal. The Company
requires no collateral from these institutions.
13. Commitments and
Contingencies
As at December 31, 2004, the Company was committed to the
construction of two Suezmax tankers scheduled for delivery in
March 2005 and July 2005, at a total cost of approximately
$95.1 million, excluding capitalized interest. As at
December 31, 2004, payments made towards these commitments
totaled $14.3 million, excluding capitalized interest and
miscellaneous construction costs. Long-term financing
arrangements existed for $42.8 million of the unpaid cost
of these vessels. The Company intends to sell upon delivery the
vessel to which a remaining unpaid amount of $38.0 million
relates, but may in the interim finance the remaining unpaid
amount through incremental debt or equity or surplus cash
balances, or a combination thereof (see Note 15). As at
December 31, 2004, the remaining payments required to be
made under these newbuilding contracts were $80.8 million
in 2005.
14. Change in Non-Cash Working
Capital Items Related to Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
(4,125 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(806 |
) |
Accounts payable
|
|
|
5,865 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
TEEKAY LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
15. Subsequent Events
In early 2005, a subsidiary of the Company completed the sale of
the Santiago Spirit (a newly constructed double-hulled
Suezmax tanker delivered in March 2005) to a subsidiary of
Teekay Shipping Corporation not organized in Spain for
$70.0 million.
F-46
AUDITED BALANCE SHEET
OF
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
F-47
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners of
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Teekay LNG
Partners L.P. as of November 9, 2004. This balance sheet is
the responsibility of the Partnerships management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this balance sheet
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
balance sheet. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall balance sheet presentation. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the balance sheet referred to above presents
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. at November 9, 2004 in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
Chartered Accountants |
Vancouver, Canada,
November 9, 2004
(except for Note 2, which is as of May 4, 2005)
F-48
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
|
November 9, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(U.S. dollars) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Partner
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
General Partner
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners equity
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this balance
sheet.
F-49
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO BALANCE SHEET
(U.S. Dollars)
Teekay LNG Partners L.P., a Marshall Islands limited partnership
(or the Partnership), was formed on November 3, 2004
to ultimately own the capital stock of Teekay Luxembourg
S.a.r.l. Teekay GP L.L.C., the Partnerships general
partner (or the General Partner), is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation. The Partnership
intends to obtain the foregoing assets in connection with the
initial public offering of its common units (the
Offering).
The Partnership has adopted a December 31 fiscal year end.
The General Partner contributed $20 and Teekay Shipping
Corporation contributed $980 to the Partnership on
November 9, 2004. There have been no other transactions
involving the Partnership as at November 9, 2004.
At the closing of the Offering, the following are among the
transactions that are expected to occur:
|
|
|
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation will contribute to the Partnership
(a) the capital stock and notes receivable of Teekay
Luxembourg S.a.r.l., which owns Teekay Spain S.L., and
(b) the capital stock of its subsidiary that owns the
Granada Spirit Suezmax tanker; |
|
|
|
|
The Partnership will issue to Teekay Shipping Corporation
8,734,572 common units and 14,734,572 subordinated
units, representing a 78.0% limited partner interest in the
Partnership; |
|
|
|
|
The Partnership will issue to the General Partner a 2% general
partner interest in the Partnership and all of the
Partnerships incentive distribution rights; |
|
|
|
|
The Partnership will issue 6,000,000 common units to the
public in an initial public offering and use the net proceeds to
repay debt the Partnership owes to Teekay Shipping Corporation
and to pay expenses associated with the public offering and
related transactions; |
|
|
|
|
The Partnership will enter into an omnibus agreement with Teekay
Shipping Corporation, the General Partner and others governing,
among other things, when the Partnership and Teekay Shipping
Corporation may compete with each other and certain rights of
first offer on LNG carriers and Suezmax tankers; |
|
|
|
The Partnership and certain of its operating subsidiaries will
enter into services agreements with certain subsidiaries of
Teekay Shipping Corporation pursuant to which the Teekay
Shipping Corporation subsidiaries will agree to provide to the
Partnership administrative services and to such operating
subsidiaries strategic consulting, advisory, ship management,
technical and administrative services. These services will be
valued at a reasonable, arms-length fee and will include
reimbursement of reasonable direct or indirect expenses incurred
to provide these services; |
|
|
|
The Partnership will enter into an agreement with Teekay
Shipping Corporation to purchase all of its interest in three
LNG newbuildings and the related 20-year time charters upon
their scheduled deliveries in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the
first half of 2007 for approximately $124.5 million, plus
the assumption of approximately $468 million of long-term debt
(such purchase to take place upon delivery of the first vessel,
which is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2006); and |
|
|
|
The Partnership will enter into a short-term, fixed-rate time
charter and vessel sales agreement with a subsidiary of Teekay
Shipping Corporation for the Granada Spirit. The charter
will terminate and Teekay Shipping Corporation will purchase the
vessel upon the earliest of delivery to the Partnership of the
Suezmax newbuilding the Toledo Spirit, scheduled for July
2005, December 31, 2004 or the election of Teekay Shipping
Corporation. The purchase price is $19.5 million but will
increase by $600,000 per month for a sale prior to July 2005 and
will decrease by $250,000 per month for a sale after that month. |
F-50
AUDITED BALANCE SHEET
OF
TEEKAY GP L.L.C.
F-51
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Member of
TEEKAY GP L.L.C.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Teekay GP
L.L.C. as of November 9, 2004. This balance sheet is the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this balance sheet
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
balance sheet. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall balance sheet presentation. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the balance sheet referred to above presents
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Teekay GP L.L.C. at November 9, 2004 in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
Chartered Accountants |
Vancouver, Canada,
November 9, 2004
(except for Note 2, which is as of May 4, 2005)
F-52
TEEKAY GP L.L.C.
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
|
November 9, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(U.S. Dollars) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
Investment in Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members equity
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this balance
sheet.
F-53
TEEKAY GP L.L.C.
NOTES TO BALANCE SHEET
(U.S. Dollars)
1. Nature of Operations
Teekay GP L.L.C. (or the Company), a Marshall
Islands limited liability company, was formed on
November 2, 2004 to become the general partner of Teekay
LNG Partners L.P. (or the Partnership). The Company
is a wholly owned subsidiary of Teekay Shipping Corporation. On
November 9, 2004, Teekay Shipping Corporation contributed
$1,000 to the Company in exchange for a 100% ownership interest.
The Company has invested $20 in the Partnership for its 2%
general partner interest. There have been no other transactions
involving the Company as of November 9, 2004.
2. Subsequent Events
The Partnership has filed a registration statement (Registration
No. 333-120727) in connection with an anticipated initial
public offering of its units (the Offering) and the
ownership of the capital stock of Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and
certain other assets.
At the closing of the Offering, the Company and the Partnership
will enter into an omnibus agreement with Teekay Shipping
Corporation and others governing, among other things, when the
Partnership and Teekay Shipping Corporation may compete with
each other and certain rights of first offer on LNG carriers and
Suezmax tankers.
F-54
APPENDIX A
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
A-i
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
A-ii
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
A-iii
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
A-iv
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP OF TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
THIS FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. dated as
of ,
2005, is entered into by and between Teekay GP L.L.C.,
a Marshall Islands limited liability company, as the General
Partner, and Teekay Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands
corporation, as the Organizational Limited Partner, together
with any other Persons who become Partners in the Partnership or
parties hereto as provided herein. In consideration of the
covenants, conditions and agreements contained herein, the
parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
Definitions
Section 1.1 Definitions.
The following definitions shall be for all purposes, unless
otherwise clearly indicated to the contrary, applied to the
terms used in this Agreement.
Acquisition means any transaction in which
any Group Member acquires (through an asset acquisition, merger,
stock acquisition or other form of investment) control over all
or a portion of the assets, properties or business of another
Person for the purpose of increasing the operating capacity or
revenues of the Partnership Group from the operating capacity or
revenues of the Partnership Group existing immediately prior to
such transaction.
Additional Book Basis means the portion of
any remaining Carrying Value of an Adjusted Property that is
attributable to positive adjustments made to such Carrying Value
as a result of Book-Up Events. For purposes of determining the
extent that Carrying Value constitutes Additional Book Basis:
|
|
|
(i) Any negative adjustment made to the Carrying Value of
an Adjusted Property as a result of either a Book-Down Event or
a Book-Up Event shall first be deemed to offset or decrease that
portion of the Carrying Value of such Adjusted Property that is
attributable to any prior positive adjustments made thereto
pursuant to a Book-Up Event or Book-Down Event. |
|
|
(ii) If Carrying Value that constitutes Additional Book
Basis is reduced as a result of a Book-Down Event and the
Carrying Value of other property is increased as a result of
such Book-Down Event, an allocable portion of any such increase
in Carrying Value shall be treated as Additional Book Basis;
provided, that the amount treated as Additional Book
Basis pursuant hereto as a result of such Book-Down Event shall
not exceed the amount by which the Aggregate Remaining Net
Positive Adjustments after such Book-Down Event exceeds the
remaining Additional Book Basis attributable to all of the
Partnerships Adjusted Property after such Book-Down Event
(determined without regard to the application of this
clause (ii) to such Book-Down Event). |
Additional Book Basis Derivative Items means
any Book Basis Derivative Items that are computed with reference
to Additional Book Basis. To the extent that the Additional Book
Basis attributable to all of the Partnerships Adjusted
Property as of the beginning of any taxable period exceeds the
Aggregate Remaining Net Positive Adjustments as of the beginning
of such period (the Excess Additional Book Basis),
the Additional Book Basis Derivative Items for such period shall
be reduced by the amount that bears the same ratio to the amount
of Additional Book Basis Derivative Items determined without
regard to this sentence as the Excess Additional Book Basis
bears to the Additional Book Basis as of the beginning of such
period.
Additional Limited Partner means a Person
admitted to the Partnership as a Limited Partner pursuant to
Section 10.4 and who is shown as such on the books and
records of the Partnership.
Adjusted Capital Account means the Capital
Account maintained for each Partner as of the end of each fiscal
year of the Partnership, (a) increased by any amounts that
such Partner is obligated to restore
A-1
under the standards set by Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(c) (or is deemed
obligated to restore under Treasury
Regulation Sections 1.704-2(g) and 1.704-2(i)(5)) and
(b) decreased by (i) the amount of all losses and
deductions that, as of the end of such fiscal year, are
reasonably expected to be allocated to such Partner in
subsequent years under Sections 704(e)(2) and 706(d) of the
Code and Treasury
Regulation Section 1.751-1(b)(2)(ii), and
(ii) the amount of all distributions that, as of the end of
such fiscal year, are reasonably expected to be made to such
Partner in subsequent years in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement or otherwise to the extent they exceed offsetting
increases to such Partners Capital Account that are
reasonably expected to occur during (or prior to) the year in
which such distributions are reasonably expected to be made
(other than increases as a result of a minimum gain chargeback
pursuant to Section 6.1(d)(i) or 6.1(d)(ii)). The foregoing
definition of Adjusted Capital Account is intended to comply
with the provisions of Treasury Regulation
Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d) and shall be interpreted
consistently therewith. The Adjusted Capital Account
of a Partner in respect of a General Partner Interest, a Common
Unit, a Subordinated Unit or an Incentive Distribution Right or
any other Partnership Interest shall be the amount which such
Adjusted Capital Account would be if such General Partner
Interest, Common Unit, Subordinated Unit, Incentive Distribution
Right or other Partnership Interest were the only interest in
the Partnership held by such Partner from and after the date on
which such General Partner Interest, Common Unit, Subordinated
Unit, Incentive Distribution Right or other
Partnership Interest was first issued.
Adjusted Operating Surplus means, with
respect to any period, Operating Surplus generated with respect
to such period (a) less (i) any net increase in
Working Capital Borrowings with respect to such period and
(ii) any net reduction in cash reserves for Operating
Expenditures with respect to such period to the extent such
reduction does not relate to an Operating Expenditure made with
respect to such period, and (b) plus (i) any net
decrease in Working Capital Borrowings with respect to such
period, and (ii) any net increase in cash reserves for
Operating Expenditures with respect to such period to the extent
such reserve is required by any debt instrument for the
repayment of principal, interest or premium. Adjusted Operating
Surplus does not include that portion of Operating Surplus
included in clauses (a)(i) and (a)(ii) of the definition of
Operating Surplus.
Adjusted Property means any property the
Carrying Value of which has been adjusted pursuant to
Section 5.5(d)(i) or 5.5(d)(ii).
Affiliate means, with respect to any Person,
any other Person that directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries controls, is controlled by or is under common
control with, the Person in question. As used herein, the term
control means the possession, direct or indirect, of
the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and
policies of a Person, whether through ownership of voting
securities, by contract or otherwise.
Aggregate Remaining Net Positive Adjustments
means, as of the end of any taxable period, the sum of the
Remaining Net Positive Adjustments of all the Partners.
Agreed Allocation means any allocation, other
than a Required Allocation, of an item of income, gain, loss or
deduction pursuant to the provisions of Section 6.1,
including, without limitation, a Curative Allocation (if
appropriate to the context in which the term Agreed
Allocation is used).
Agreed Value of any Contributed Property
means the fair market value of such property or other
consideration at the time of contribution as determined by the
General Partner. The General Partner shall use such method as it
determines to be appropriate to allocate the aggregate Agreed
Value of Contributed Properties contributed to the Partnership
in a single or integrated transaction among each separate
property on a basis proportional to the fair market value of
each Contributed Property.
Agreement means this First Amended and
Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Teekay
LNG Partners L.P., as it may be amended, supplemented
or restated from time to time.
Assignee means a Person to whom one or more
Limited Partner Interests have been transferred in a manner
permitted under this Agreement and who has executed and
delivered a Transfer Application as required by this Agreement,
but who has not been admitted as a Substituted Limited Partner.
A-2
Associate means, when used to indicate a
relationship with any Person, (a) any corporation or
organization of which such Person is a director, officer or
partner or is, directly or indirectly, the owner of 20% or more
of any class of voting stock or other voting interest;
(b) any trust or other estate in which such Person has at
least a 20% beneficial interest or as to which such Person
serves as trustee or in a similar fiduciary capacity; and
(c) any relative or spouse of such Person, or any relative
of such spouse, who has the same principal residence as such
Person.
Available Cash means, with respect to any
Quarter ending prior to the Liquidation Date:
|
|
|
(a) the sum of (i) all cash and cash equivalents of
the Partnership Group on hand at the end of such Quarter, and
(ii) all additional cash and cash equivalents of the
Partnership Group on hand on the date of determination of
Available Cash with respect to such Quarter resulting from
Working Capital Borrowings made subsequent to the end of such
Quarter, less |
|
|
(b) the amount of any cash reserves established by the
General Partner to (i) provide for the proper conduct of
the business of the Partnership Group (including reserves for
future capital expenditures and for anticipated future credit
needs of the Partnership Group) subsequent to such Quarter,
(ii) comply with applicable law or any loan agreement,
security agreement, mortgage, debt instrument or other agreement
or obligation to which any Group Member is a party or by which
it is bound or its assets are subject or (iii) provide
funds for distributions under Section 6.4 or 6.5 in respect
of any one or more of the next four Quarters; provided,
however, that the General Partner may not establish cash
reserves pursuant to (iii) above if the effect of such
reserves would be that the Partnership is unable to distribute
the Minimum Quarterly Distribution on all Common Units, plus any
Cumulative Common Unit Arrearage on all Common Units, with
respect to such Quarter; and, provided further, that
disbursements made by a Group Member or cash reserves
established, increased or reduced after the end of such Quarter
but on or before the date of determination of Available Cash
with respect to such Quarter shall be deemed to have been made,
established, increased or reduced, for purposes of determining
Available Cash, within such Quarter if the General Partner so
determines. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Available Cash
with respect to the Quarter in which the Liquidation Date occurs
and any subsequent Quarter shall equal zero.
Board of Directors means the board of
directors or managers of a corporation or limited liability
company, as applicable, or if a limited partnership, the board
of directors or board of managers of the general partner of such
limited partnership.
Book Basis Derivative Items means any item of
income, deduction, gain or loss included in the determination of
Net Income or Net Loss that is computed with reference to the
Carrying Value of an Adjusted Property (e.g., depreciation,
depletion, or gain or loss with respect to an Adjusted Property).
Book-Down Event means an event that triggers
a negative adjustment to the Capital Accounts of the Partners
pursuant to Section 5.5(d).
Book-Tax Disparity means with respect to any
item of Contributed Property or Adjusted Property, as of the
date of any determination, the difference between the Carrying
Value of such Contributed Property or Adjusted Property and the
adjusted basis thereof for United States federal income tax
purposes as of such date. A Partners share of the
Partnerships Book-Tax Disparities in all of its
Contributed Property and Adjusted Property will be reflected by
the difference between such Partners Capital Account
balance as maintained pursuant to Section 5.5 and the
hypothetical balance of such Partners Capital Account
computed as if it had been maintained strictly in accordance
with federal income tax accounting principles.
Book-Up Event means an event that triggers a
positive adjustment to the Capital Accounts of the Partners
pursuant to Section 5.5(d).
Business Day means Monday through Friday of
each week, except that a legal holiday recognized as such by the
government of the United States of America or the State of New
York shall not be regarded as a Business Day.
A-3
Capital Account means the capital account
maintained for a Partner pursuant to Section 5.5. The
Capital Account of a Partner in respect of a
General Partner Interest, a Common Unit, a Subordinated Unit, an
Incentive Distribution Right or any other
Partnership Interest shall be the amount which such Capital
Account would be if such General Partner Interest, Common Unit,
Subordinated Unit, Incentive Distribution Right or other
Partnership Interest were the only interest in the Partnership
held by such Partner from and after the date on which such
General Partner Interest, Common Unit, Subordinated Unit,
Incentive Distribution Right or other Partnership Interest was
first issued.
Capital Contribution means any cash, cash
equivalents or the Net Agreed Value of Contributed Property that
a Partner contributes to the Partnership.
Capital Improvement means any
(a) addition or improvement to the capital assets owned by
any Group Member or (b) acquisition of existing, or the
construction of new, capital assets (including, without
limitation, liquefied natural gas carriers, crude oil tankers
and related assets), in each case if such addition, improvement,
acquisition or construction is made to increase the operating
capacity or revenues of the Partnership Group from the operating
capacity or revenues of the Partnership Group existing
immediately prior to such addition, improvement, acquisition or
construction.
Capital Surplus has the meaning assigned to
such term in Section 6.3(a).
Carrying Value means (a) with respect to
a Contributed Property, the Agreed Value of such property
reduced (but not below zero) by all depreciation, amortization
and cost recovery deductions charged to the Partners and
Assignees Capital Accounts in respect of such Contributed
Property, and (b) with respect to any other Partnership
property, the adjusted basis of such property for United States
federal income tax purposes, all as of the time of
determination. The Carrying Value of any property shall be
adjusted from time to time in accordance with
Sections 5.5(d)(i) and 5.5(d)(ii) and to reflect changes,
additions or other adjustments to the Carrying Value for
dispositions and acquisitions of Partnership properties, as
deemed appropriate by the General Partner.
Cause means a court of competent jurisdiction
has entered a final, non-appealable judgment finding the General
Partner liable for actual fraud, gross negligence or willful or
wanton misconduct in its capacity as a general partner of the
Partnership.
Certificate means a certificate
(i) substantially in the form of Exhibit A to this
Agreement, (ii) issued in global form in accordance with
the rules and regulations of the Depositary or (iii) in
such other form as may be adopted by the General Partner, issued
by the Partnership evidencing ownership of one or more Common
Units or a certificate, in such form as may be adopted by the
General Partner, issued by the Partnership evidencing ownership
of one or more other Partnership Securities.
Certificate of Limited Partnership means the
Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Partnership filed with
the Registrar of Corporations of the Marshall Islands as
referenced in Section 7.2 as such Certificate of Registration
may be amended, supplemented or restated from time to time.
Citizenship Certification means a properly
completed certificate in such form as may be specified by the
General Partner by which an Assignee or a Limited Partner
certifies that he (and if he is a nominee holding for the
account of another Person, that to the best of his knowledge
such other Person) is an Eligible Citizen.
Claim (as used in Section 7.12(c)) has
the meaning assigned to such term in Section 7.12(c).
Closing Date means the first date on which
Common Units are sold by the Partnership to the Underwriters
pursuant to the provisions of the Underwriting Agreement.
Closing Price has the meaning assigned to
such term in Section 15.1(a).
Code means the United States Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended and in effect from time to time. Any
reference herein to a specific section or sections of the Code
shall be deemed to include a reference to any corresponding
provision of any successor law.
A-4
Combined Interest has the meaning assigned to
such term in Section 11.3(a).
Commences Commercial Service and
Commenced Commercial Service shall mean the
date a Capital Improvement is first put into service following
completion of construction and testing.
Commission means the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Common Unit means a Partnership Security
representing a fractional part of the Partnership Interests
of all Limited Partners and Assignees, and having the rights and
obligations specified with respect to Common Units in this
Agreement. The term Common Unit does not refer to a
Subordinated Unit prior to its conversion into a Common Unit
pursuant to the terms hereof.
Common Unit Arrearage means, with respect to
any Common Unit, whenever issued, as to any Quarter within the
Subordination Period, the excess, if any, of (a) the
Minimum Quarterly Distribution with respect to a Common Unit in
respect of such Quarter over (b) the sum of all Available
Cash distributed with respect to a Common Unit in respect of
such Quarter pursuant to Section 6.4(a)(i).
Conflicts Committee means a committee of the
Board of Directors of the General Partner composed entirely of
two or more directors who are not (a) security holders,
officers or employees of the General Partner, (b) officers,
directors or employees of any Affiliate of the General Partner
or (c) holders of any ownership interest in the Partnership
Group other than Common Units and who also meet the independence
standards required of directors who serve on an audit committee
of a board of directors established by the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the
Commission thereunder and by the National Securities Exchange on
which the Common Units are listed.
Contributed Property means each property or
other asset, in such form as may be permitted by the Marshall
Islands Act, but excluding cash, contributed to the Partnership.
Once the Carrying Value of a Contributed Property is adjusted
pursuant to Section 5.5(d), such property shall no longer
constitute a Contributed Property, but shall be deemed an
Adjusted Property.
Contribution Agreement means that certain
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement, dated as of
the Closing Date, among the General Partner, the Partnership,
the Operating Company, Teekay Shipping Corporation and the other
parties named therein, together with the additional conveyance
documents and instruments contemplated or referenced thereunder.
Cumulative Common Unit Arrearage means, with
respect to any Common Unit, whenever issued, and as of the end
of any Quarter, the excess, if any, of (a) the sum
resulting from adding together the Common Unit Arrearage as to
an Initial Common Unit for each of the Quarters within the
Subordination Period ending on or before the last day of such
Quarter over (b) the sum of any distributions theretofore
made pursuant to Section 6.4(a)(ii) and the second sentence
of Section 6.5 with respect to an Initial Common Unit
(including any distributions to be made in respect of the last
of such Quarters).
Curative Allocation means any allocation of
an item of income, gain, deduction, loss or credit pursuant to
the provisions of Section 6.1(d)(xi).
Current Market Price has the meaning assigned
to such term in Section 15.1(a).
Departing Partner means a former General
Partner from and after the effective date of any withdrawal or
removal of such former General Partner pursuant to
Section 11.1 or 11.2.
Depositary means, with respect to any Units
issued in global form, The Depository Trust Company and its
successors and permitted assigns.
Economic Risk of Loss has the meaning set
forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.752-2(a).
Eligible Citizen means a Person qualified to
own interests in real property in jurisdictions in which any
Group Member does business or proposes to do business from time
to time, and whose status as a Limited Partner or Assignee does
not or would not subject such Group Member to a significant risk
of cancellation or forfeiture of any of its properties or any
interest therein.
A-5
Estimated Incremental Quarterly Tax Amount
has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 6.9.
Estimated Maintenance Capital Expenditures
means an estimate made in good faith by the Board of Directors
of the General Partner (with the concurrence of the Conflicts
Committee) of the average quarterly Maintenance Capital
Expenditures that the Partnership will incur over the long term.
The Board of Directors of the General Partner (with the
concurrence of the Conflicts Committee) will be permitted to
make such estimate in any manner it determines reasonable. The
estimate will be made at least annually and whenever an event
occurs that is likely to result in a material adjustment to the
amount of Maintenance Capital Expenditures on a long-term basis.
The Partnership shall disclose to its Partners any change in the
amount of Estimated Maintenance Capital Expenditures in its
reports made in accordance with Section 8.3 to the extent
not previously disclosed. Except as provided in the definition
of Subordination Period, any adjustments to Estimated
Maintenance Capital Expenditures shall be prospective only.
Expansion Capital Expenditures means cash
expenditures for Acquisitions or Capital Improvements. Expansion
Capital Expenditures shall not include Maintenance Capital
Expenditures. Expansion Capital Expenditures shall include
interest (and related fees) on debt incurred and distributions
on equity incurred, in each case, to finance the construction of
a Capital Improvement and paid during the period beginning on
the date that the Partnership enters into a Capital Improvement
and ending on the earlier to occur of the date that such Capital
Improvement Commences Commercial Service or the date that such
Capital Improvement is abandoned or disposed of. Debt incurred
or equity issued to fund such construction period interest
payments, or such construction period distributions on equity
paid during such period shall also be deemed to be debt or
equity, as the case may be, incurred to finance the construction
of a Capital Improvement.
Event of Withdrawal has the meaning assigned
to such term in Section 11.1(a).
Final Subordinated Units has the meaning
assigned to such term in Section 6.1(d)(x).
First Liquidation Target Amount has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 6.1(c)(i)(D).
First Target Distribution means $0.4625 per
Unit per Quarter (or, with respect to the period commencing on
the Closing Date and ending on June 30, 2005, it means the
product of $0.4625 multiplied by a fraction of which the
numerator is the number of days in such period, and of which the
denominator is 91), subject to adjustment in accordance with
Sections 6.6 and 6.9.
Fully Diluted Basis means, when calculating
the number of Outstanding Units for any period, a basis that
includes, in addition to the Outstanding Units, all Partnership
Securities and options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights
relating to an equity interest in the Partnership (a) that
are convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for Units
that are senior to or pari passu with the Subordinated Units,
(b) whose conversion, exercise or exchange price is less
than the Current Market Price on the date of such calculation,
(c) that may be converted into or exercised or exchanged
for such Units prior to or during the Quarter immediately
following the end of the period for which the calculation is
being made without the satisfaction of any contingency beyond
the control of the holder other than the payment of
consideration and the compliance with administrative mechanics
applicable to such conversion, exercise or exchange and
(d) that were not converted into or exercised or exchanged
for such Units during the period for which the calculation is
being made; provided, that for purposes of determining
the number of Outstanding Units on a Fully Diluted Basis when
calculating whether the Subordination Period has ended or
Subordinated Units are entitled to convert into Common Units
pursuant to Section 5.8, such Partnership Securities,
options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights shall be
deemed to have been Outstanding Units only for the four Quarters
that comprise the last four Quarters of the measurement period;
provided, further, that if consideration will be paid to
any Group Member in connection with such conversion, exercise or
exchange, the number of Units to be included in such calculation
shall be that number equal to the difference between
(i) the number of Units issuable upon such conversion,
exercise or exchange and (ii) the number of Units that such
consideration would purchase at the Current Market Price.
A-6
General Partner means Teekay GP L.L.C., a
Marshall Islands limited liability company, and its successors
and permitted assigns as general partner of the Partnership.
General Partner Interest means the ownership
interest of the General Partner in the Partnership (in its
capacity as a general partner without reference to any Limited
Partner Interest held by it) which may be evidenced by
Partnership Securities or a combination thereof or interest
therein, and includes any and all benefits to which the General
Partner is entitled as provided in this Agreement, together with
all obligations of the General Partner to comply with the terms
and provisions of this Agreement.
Group means a Person that with or through any
of its Affiliates or Associates has any agreement, arrangement
or understanding for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting
(except voting pursuant to a revocable proxy or consent given to
such Person in response to a proxy or consent solicitation made
to 10 or more Persons) or disposing of any Partnership
Securities with any other Person that beneficially owns, or
whose Affiliates or Associates beneficially own, directly or
indirectly, Partnership Securities.
Group Member means a member of the
Partnership Group.
Group Member Agreement means the partnership
agreement of any Group Member, other than the Partnership, that
is a limited or general partnership, the limited liability
company agreement of any Group Member that is a limited
liability company, the certificate of incorporation and bylaws
or similar organizational documents of any Group Member that is
a corporation, the joint venture agreement or similar governing
document of any Group Member that is a joint venture and the
governing or organizational or similar documents of any other
Group Member that is a Person other than a limited or general
partnership, limited liability company, corporation or joint
venture, as such may be amended, supplemented or restated from
time to time.
Holder as used in Section 7.12, has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 7.12(a).
Incentive Distribution Right means a
non-voting Limited Partner Interest issued to the General
Partner, which Partnership Interest will confer upon the
holder thereof only the rights and obligations specifically
provided in this Agreement with respect to Incentive
Distribution Rights (and no other rights otherwise available to
or other obligations of a holder of a
Partnership Interest). Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, the holder of an Incentive
Distribution Right shall not be entitled to vote such Incentive
Distribution Right on any Partnership matter except as may
otherwise be required by law.
Incentive Distributions means any amount of
cash distributed to the holders of the Incentive Distribution
Rights pursuant to Sections 6.4(a)(v), (vi) and
(vii) and 6.4(b)(iii), (iv) and (v).
Indemnified Persons has the meaning assigned
to such term in Section 7.12(c).
Indemnitee means (a) the General
Partner, (b) any Departing Partner, (c) any Person who
is or was an Affiliate of the General Partner or any Departing
Partner, (d) any Person who is or was a member, partner,
director, officer, fiduciary or trustee of any Person which any
of the preceding clauses of this definition describes,
(e) any Person who is or was serving at the request of the
General Partner or any Departing Partner or any Affiliate of the
General Partner or any Departing Partner as an officer,
director, member, partner, fiduciary or trustee of another
Person, provided that that Person shall not be an Indemnitee by
reason of providing, on a fee-for-services basis, trustee,
fiduciary or custodial services, and (f) any Person the
General Partner designates as an Indemnitee for
purposes of this Agreement.
Initial Common Units means the Common Units
sold in the Initial Offering.
Initial Limited Partners means Teekay
Shipping Corporation and the General Partner (with respect to
the Incentive Distribution Rights received by it pursuant to
Section 5.2), and the Underwriters, in each case upon being
admitted to the Partnership in accordance with Section 10.1.
Initial Offering means the initial offering
and sale of Common Units to the public, as described in the
Registration Statement.
A-7
Initial Unit Price means (a) with
respect to the Common Units and the Subordinated Units, the
initial public offering price per Common Unit at which the
Underwriters offered the Common Units to the public for sale as
set forth on the cover page of the prospectus included as part
of the Registration Statement and first issued at or after the
time the Registration Statement first became effective or
(b) with respect to any other class or series of Units, the
price per Unit at which such class or series of Units is
initially sold by the Partnership, as determined by the General
Partner, in each case adjusted as the General Partner determines
to be appropriate to give effect to any distribution,
subdivision or combination of Units.
Interim Capital Transactions means the
following transactions if they occur prior to the Liquidation
Date: (a) borrowings, refinancings or refundings of
indebtedness (other than Working Capital Borrowings and other
than for items purchased on open account in the ordinary course
of business) by any Group Member and sales of debt securities of
any Group Member; (b) sales of equity interests of any
Group Member (including the Common Units sold to the
Underwriters pursuant to the exercise of the Over-Allotment
Option); (c) sales or other voluntary or involuntary
dispositions of any assets of any Group Member other than
(i) sales or other dispositions of inventory, accounts
receivable and other assets in the ordinary course of business,
and (ii) sales or other dispositions of assets as part of
normal retirements or replacements; (d) the termination of
interest rate swap agreements; (e) capital contributions;
and (f) corporate reorganizations or restructurings.
Issue Price means the price at which a Unit
is purchased from the Partnership, after reflecting any sales
commission or underwriting discount charged to the Partnership.
Limited Partner means, unless the context
otherwise requires, (a) the Organizational Limited Partner
prior to its withdrawal from the Partnership, each Initial
Limited Partner, each Substituted Limited Partner, each
Additional Limited Partner and any Departing Partner upon the
change of its status from General Partner to Limited Partner
pursuant to Section 11.3 or (b) solely for purposes of
Articles V, VI, VII and IX, each Assignee; provided,
however, that when the term Limited Partner is
used herein in the context of any vote or other approval,
including without limitation Article XIII, such term shall
not, solely for such purpose, include any holder of an Incentive
Distribution Right except as may otherwise be required by law.
Limited Partner Interest means the ownership
interest of a Limited Partner or Assignee in the Partnership,
which may be evidenced by Common Units, Subordinated Units,
Incentive Distribution Rights or other Partnership Securities or
a combination thereof or interest therein, and includes any and
all benefits to which such Limited Partner or Assignee is
entitled as provided in this Agreement, together with all
obligations of such Limited Partner or Assignee to comply with
the terms and provisions of this Agreement; provided,
however, that when the term Limited Partner
Interest is used herein in the context of any vote or
other approval, including without limitation Article XIII,
such term shall not, solely for such purpose, include any holder
of an Incentive Distribution Right except as may otherwise be
required by law.
Liquidation Date means (a) in the case
of an event giving rise to the dissolution of the Partnership of
the type described in clauses (a) and (b) of the first
sentence of Section 12.2, the date on which the applicable
time period during which the holders of Outstanding Units have
the right to elect to continue the business of the Partnership
has expired without such an election being made, and (b) in
the case of any other event giving rise to the dissolution of
the Partnership, the date on which such event occurs.
Liquidator means one or more Persons selected
by the General Partner to perform the functions described in
Section 12.4.
Maintenance Capital Expenditures means cash
expenditures (including expenditures for the addition or
improvement to the capital assets owned by any Group Member or
for the acquisition of existing, or the construction of new,
capital assets) if such expenditure is made to maintain,
including over the long term, the operating capacity of the
capital assets of the Partnership Group, as such assets existed
at the time of the expenditure. Maintenance Capital Expenditures
shall not include Expansion Capital
A-8
Expenditures. Maintenance Capital Expenditures shall include
interest (and related fees) on debt incurred and distributions
on equity incurred, in each case, to finance the construction of
a replacement asset and paid during the period beginning on the
date that the Partnership enters into a binding obligation to
commence constructing a replacement asset and ending on the
earlier to occur of the date that such replacement asset
Commences Commercial Service or the date that such replacement
asset is abandoned or disposed of. Debt incurred to pay or
equity issued to fund the construction period interest payments,
or such construction period distributions on equity shall also
be deemed to be debt or equity, as the case may be, incurred to
finance the construction of a replacement asset.
Marshall Islands Act means the Limited
Partnership Act of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, as
amended, supplemented or restated from time to time, and any
successor to such statute.
Merger Agreement has the meaning assigned to
such term in Section 14.1.
Minimum Quarterly Distribution means
$0.4125 per Unit per Quarter (or with respect to the period
commencing on the Closing Date and ending on June 30, 2005, it
means the product of $0.4125 multiplied by a fraction of which
the numerator is the number of days in such period and of which
the denominator is 91), subject to adjustment in accordance with
Sections 6.6 and 6.9.
National Securities Exchange means an
exchange registered with the Commission under Section 6(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, supplemented
or restated from time to time, and any successor to such
statute, or the Nasdaq Stock Market or any successor thereto.
Net Agreed Value means, (a) in the case
of any Contributed Property, the Agreed Value of such property
reduced by any liabilities either assumed by the Partnership
upon such contribution or to which such property is subject when
contributed, and (b) in the case of any property
distributed to a Partner or Assignee by the Partnership, the
Partnerships Carrying Value of such property (as adjusted
pursuant to Section 5.5(d)(ii)) at the time such property
is distributed, reduced by any indebtedness either assumed by
such Partner or Assignee upon such distribution or to which such
property is subject at the time of distribution, in either case,
as determined under Section 752 of the Code.
Net Income means, for any taxable year, the
excess, if any, of the Partnerships items of income and
gain (other than those items taken into account in the
computation of Net Termination Gain or Net Termination Loss) for
such taxable year over the Partnerships items of loss and
deduction (other than those items taken into account in the
computation of Net Termination Gain or Net Termination Loss) for
such taxable year. The items included in the calculation of Net
Income shall be determined in accordance with
Section 5.5(b) and shall not include any items specially
allocated under Section 6.1(d); provided, that the
determination of the items that have been specially allocated
under Section 6.1(d) shall be made as if
Section 6.1(d)(xii) were not in this Agreement.
Net Loss means, for any taxable year, the
excess, if any, of the Partnerships items of loss and
deduction (other than those items taken into account in the
computation of Net Termination Gain or Net Termination Loss) for
such taxable year over the Partnerships items of income
and gain (other than those items taken into account in the
computation of Net Termination Gain or Net Termination Loss) for
such taxable year. The items included in the calculation of Net
Loss shall be determined in accordance with Section 5.5(b)
and shall not include any items specially allocated under
Section 6.1(d); provided, that the determination of
the items that have been specially allocated under
Section 6.1(d) shall be made as if Section 6.1(d)(xii)
were not in this Agreement.
Net Positive Adjustments means, with respect
to any Partner, the excess, if any, of the total positive
adjustments over the total negative adjustments made to the
Capital Account of such Partner pursuant to Book-Up Events and
Book-Down Events.
Net Termination Gain means, for any taxable
year, the sum, if positive, of all items of income, gain, loss
or deduction recognized by the Partnership after the Liquidation
Date. The items included in the determination of Net Termination
Gain shall be determined in accordance with Section 5.5(b)
and shall not include any items of income, gain or loss
specially allocated under Section 6.1(d).
A-9
Net Termination Loss means, for any taxable
year, the sum, if negative, of all items of income, gain, loss
or deduction recognized by the Partnership after the Liquidation
Date. The items included in the determination of Net Termination
Loss shall be determined in accordance with Section 5.5(b)
and shall not include any items of income, gain or loss
specially allocated under Section 6.1(d).
Nonrecourse Built-in Gain means with respect
to any Contributed Properties or Adjusted Properties that are
subject to a mortgage or pledge securing a Nonrecourse
Liability, the amount of any taxable gain that would be
allocated to the Partners pursuant to
Sections 6.2(b)(i)(A), 6.2(b)(ii)(A) and 6.2(b)(iii) if
such properties were disposed of in a taxable transaction in
full satisfaction of such liabilities and for no other
consideration.
Nonrecourse Deductions means any and all
items of loss, deduction or expenditure (including, without
limitation, any expenditure described in
Section 705(a)(2)(B) of the Code) that, in accordance with
the principles of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-2(b), are attributable to a
Nonrecourse Liability.
Nonrecourse Liability has the meaning set
forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.752-1(a)(2).
Notice of Election to Purchase has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 15.1(b).
Omnibus Agreement means that Omnibus
Agreement, dated as of the Closing Date, among Teekay Shipping
Corporation, the General Partner, the Partnership, and the
Operating Company.
Operating Company means Teekay LNG Operating
L.L.C., a Marshall Islands limited liability company, and any
successors thereto.
Operating Company Agreement means the Limited
Liability Company Agreement of the Operating Company, as it may
be amended, supplemented or restated from time to time.
Operating Expenditures means all Partnership
Group cash expenditures, including, but not limited to, taxes,
reimbursements of the General Partner, repayment of Working
Capital Borrowings, debt service payments and capital
expenditures, subject to the following:
|
|
|
(a) Payments (including prepayments and prepayment
penalties) of principal of and premium on indebtedness other
than Working Capital Borrowings shall not constitute Operating
Expenditures; and |
|
|
|
(b) Operating Expenditures shall not include
(i) Expansion Capital Expenditures or actual Maintenance
Capital Expenditures, but shall include Estimated Maintenance
Capital Expenditures, (ii) payment of transaction expenses
(including taxes) relating to Interim Capital Transactions or
(iii) distributions to Partners. |
|
|
|
Where capital expenditures consist of both Maintenance Capital
Expenditures and Expansion Capital Expenditures, the General
Partner, with the concurrence of the Conflicts Committee, shall
determine the allocation between the portion consisting of
Maintenance Capital Expenditures and the portion consisting of
Expansion Capital Expenditures, and the period over which the
Maintenance Capital Expenditures will be deducted as an
Operating Expenditure in calculating Operating Surplus. |
Operating Surplus means, with respect to any
period ending prior to the Liquidation Date, on a cumulative
basis and without duplication,
|
|
|
(a) the sum of (i) $10 million, (ii) all
cash and cash equivalents of the Partnership Group on hand as of
the close of business on the Closing Date, other than cash
reserved to terminate interest rate swap agreements,
(iii) all cash receipts of the Partnership Group for the
period beginning on the Closing Date and ending on the last day
of such period, other than cash receipts from Interim Capital
Transactions (except to the extent specified in
Section 6.5), (iv) all cash receipts of the
Partnership Group after the end of such period but on or before
the date of determination of Operating Surplus with respect to
such period resulting from Working Capital Borrowings and (v)
the amount of distributions paid on equity issued in connection
with the construction of a Capital Improvement or replacement
asset and paid during the period beginning on the date that the
Partnership enters into a |
A-10
|
|
|
|
binding obligation to commence construction of such Capital
Improvement or replacement asset and ending on the earlier to
occur of the date that such Capital Improvement or replacement
asset Commences Commercial Service or the date that it is
abandoned or disposed of (equity issued to fund the construction
period interest payments on debt incurred (including periodic
net payments under related interest rate swap agreements), or
construction period distributions on equity issued, to finance
the construction of a Capital Improvement or replacement asset
shall also be deemed to be equity issued to finance the
construction of a Capital Improvement or replacement asset for
purposes of this clause (v)), less |
|
|
|
(b) the sum of (i) Operating Expenditures for the
period beginning on the Closing Date and ending on the last day
of such period and (ii) the amount of cash reserves
established by the General Partner to provide funds for future
Operating Expenditures; provided, however, that
disbursements made (including contributions to a Group Member or
disbursements on behalf of a Group Member) or cash reserves
established, increased or reduced after the end of such period
but on or before the date of determination of Available Cash
with respect to such period shall be deemed to have been made,
established, increased or reduced, for purposes of determining
Operating Surplus, within such period if the General Partner so
determines. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Operating
Surplus with respect to the Quarter in which the
Liquidation Date occurs and any subsequent Quarter shall equal
zero.
Opinion of Counsel means a written opinion of
counsel (who may be regular counsel to the Partnership or the
General Partner or any of its Affiliates) acceptable to the
General Partner.
Option Closing Date means the date or dates
on which any Common Units are sold by the Partnership to the
Underwriters upon exercise of the Over-Allotment Option.
Organizational Limited Partner means Teekay
Shipping Corporation in its capacity as the organizational
limited partner of the Partnership pursuant to this Agreement.
Outstanding means, with respect to
Partnership Securities, all Partnership Securities that are
issued by the Partnership and reflected as outstanding on the
Partnerships books and records as of the date of
determination; provided, however, that if at any time any
Person or Group (other than the General Partner or its
Affiliates) beneficially owns 20% or more of any Outstanding
Partnership Securities of any class then Outstanding, all
Partnership Securities owned by such Person or Group shall not
be voted on any matter and shall not be considered to be
Outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of Limited
Partners to vote on any matter (unless otherwise required by
law), calculating required votes, determining the presence of a
quorum or for other similar purposes under this Agreement,
except that Common Units so owned shall be considered to be
Outstanding for purposes of Section 11.1(b)(iv) (such
Common Units shall not, however, be treated as a separate class
of Partnership Securities for purposes of this Agreement);
provided, further, that the foregoing limitation shall
not apply (i) to any Person or Group who acquired 20% or
more of any Outstanding Partnership Securities of any class then
Outstanding directly from the General Partner or its Affiliates,
(ii) to any Person or Group who acquired 20% or more of any
Outstanding Partnership Securities of any class then Outstanding
directly or indirectly from a Person or Group described in
clause (i) provided that the General Partner shall have
notified such Person or Group in writing that such limitation
shall not apply, or (iii) to any Person or Group who
acquired 20% or more of any Partnership Securities issued by the
Partnership with the prior approval of the board of directors of
the General Partner.
Over-Allotment Option means the
over-allotment option granted to the Underwriters by the
Partnership pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement.
Partner Nonrecourse Debt has the meaning set
forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(b)(4).
Partner Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain has the
meaning set forth in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-2(i)(2).
A-11
Partner Nonrecourse Deductions means any and
all items of loss, deduction or expenditure (including, without
limitation, any expenditure described in
Section 705(a)(2)(B) of the Code) that, in accordance with
the principles of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-2(i), are attributable to a
Partner Nonrecourse Debt.
Partners means the General Partner and the
Limited Partners.
Partnership means Teekay LNG Partners L.P., a
Marshall Islands limited partnership, and any successors thereto.
Partnership Group means the Partnership and
its Subsidiaries treated as a single consolidated entity.
Partnership Interest means an interest
in the Partnership, which shall include the General Partner
Interest and Limited Partner Interests.
Partnership Minimum Gain means that amount
determined in accordance with the principles of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-2(d).
Partnership Security means any class or
series of equity interest in the Partnership (but excluding any
options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to an
equity interest in the Partnership), including without
limitation, Common Units, Subordinated Units and Incentive
Distribution Rights.
Percentage Interest means as of any date of
determination (a) as to the General Partner (in its
capacity as General Partner without reference to any Limited
Partner Interests held by it), 2.0%, (b) as to any
Unitholder or Assignee holding Units, the product obtained by
multiplying (i) 98% less the percentage applicable to
paragraph (c) by (ii) the quotient obtained by
dividing (A) the number of Units held by such Unitholder or
Assignee by (B) the total number of all Outstanding Units,
and (c) as to the holders of additional Partnership
Securities issued by the Partnership in accordance with
Section 5.6, the percentage established as a part of such
issuance. The Percentage Interest with respect to an Incentive
Distribution Right shall at all times be zero.
Person means an individual or a corporation,
firm, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture,
trust, unincorporated organization, association, governmental
agency or political subdivision thereof or other entity.
Per Unit Capital Amount means, as of any date
of determination, the Capital Account, stated on a per Unit
basis, underlying any Unit held by a Person other than the
General Partner or any Affiliate of the General Partner who
holds Units.
Pro Rata means (a) when modifying Units
or any class thereof, apportioned equally among all designated
Units in accordance with their relative Percentage Interests,
(b) when modifying Partners and Assignees or Record
Holders, apportioned among all Partners and Assignees or Record
Holders in accordance with their relative Percentage Interests
and (c) when modifying holders of Incentive Distribution
Rights, apportioned equally among all holders of Incentive
Distribution Rights in accordance with the relative number or
percentage of Incentive Distribution Rights held by each such
holder.
Purchase Date means the date determined by
the General Partner as the date for purchase of all Outstanding
Limited Partner Interests of a certain class (other than Limited
Partner Interests owned by the General Partner and its
Affiliates) pursuant to Article XV.
Quarter means, unless the context requires
otherwise, a fiscal quarter, or, with respect to the first
fiscal quarter after the Closing Date, the portion of such
fiscal quarter after the Closing Date, of the Partnership.
Recapture Income means any gain recognized by
the Partnership (computed without regard to any adjustment
required by Section 734 or Section 743 of the Code)
upon the disposition of any property or asset of the
Partnership, which gain is characterized as ordinary income
because it represents the recapture of deductions previously
taken with respect to such property or asset.
A-12
Record Date means the date established by the
General Partner for determining (a) the identity of the
Record Holders entitled to notice of, or to vote at, any meeting
of Limited Partners or entitled to vote by ballot or give
approval of Partnership action in writing without a meeting or
entitled to exercise rights in respect of any lawful action of
Limited Partners or (b) the identity of Record Holders
entitled to receive any report or distribution or to participate
in any offer.
Record Holder means the Person in whose name
a Common Unit is registered on the books of the Transfer Agent
as of the opening of business on a particular Business Day, or
with respect to other Partnership Securities, the Person in
whose name any such other Partnership Security is registered on
the books that the General Partner has caused to be kept as of
the opening of business on such Business Day.
Registrar means the Registrar of Corporations
as defined in Section 4 of the Marshall Islands Business
Corporation Act.
Registration Statement means the Registration
Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-120727) as
it has been or as it may be amended or supplemented from time to
time, filed by the Partnership with the Commission under the
Securities Act to register the offering and sale of the Common
Units in the Initial Offering.
Remaining Net Positive Adjustments means as
of the end of any taxable period, (i) with respect to the
Unitholders holding Common Units or Subordinated Units, the
excess of (a) the Net Positive Adjustments of the
Unitholders holding Common Units or Subordinated Units as of the
end of such period over (b) the sum of those Partners
Share of Additional Book Basis Derivative Items for each prior
taxable period, (ii) with respect to the General Partner
(as holder of the General Partner Interest), the excess of
(a) the Net Positive Adjustments of the General Partner as
of the end of such period over (b) the sum of the General
Partners Share of Additional Book Basis Derivative Items
with respect to the General Partner Interest for each prior
taxable period, and (iii) with respect to the holders of
Incentive Distribution Rights, the excess of (a) the Net
Positive Adjustments of the holders of Incentive Distribution
Rights as of the end of such period over (b) the sum of the
Share of Additional Book Basis Derivative Items of the holders
of the Incentive Distribution Rights for each prior taxable
period.
Required Allocations means (a) any
limitation imposed on any allocation of Net Losses or Net
Termination Losses under Section 6.1(b) or 6.1(c)(ii) and
(b) any allocation of an item of income, gain, loss or
deduction pursuant to Section 6.1(d)(i), 6.1(d)(ii),
6.1(d)(iv), 6.1(d)(vii) or 6.1(d)(ix).
Residual Gain or Residual Loss
means any item of gain or loss, as the case may be, of the
Partnership recognized for United States federal income tax
purposes resulting from a sale, exchange or other disposition of
a Contributed Property or Adjusted Property, to the extent such
item of gain or loss is not allocated pursuant to
Section 6.2(b)(i)(A) or 6.2(b)(ii)(A), respectively, to
eliminate Book-Tax Disparities.
Second Liquidation Target Amount has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 6.1(c)(i)(E).
Second Target Distribution means
$0.5375 per Unit per Quarter (or, with respect to the
period commencing on the Closing Date and ending on
June 30, 2005, it means the product of
$0.5375 multiplied by a fraction of which the numerator is
equal to the number of days in such period and of which the
denominator is 91), subject to adjustment in accordance with
Sections 6.6 and 6.9.
Securities Act means the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, supplemented or restated from time to time and
any successor to such statute.
Share of Additional Book Basis Derivative
Items means in connection with any allocation of
Additional Book Basis Derivative Items for any taxable period,
(i) with respect to the Unitholders holding Common Units or
Subordinated Units, the amount that bears the same ratio to such
Additional Book Basis Derivative Items as the Unitholders
Remaining Net Positive Adjustments as of the end of such period
bears to the Aggregate Remaining Net Positive Adjustments as of
that time, (ii) with respect to the General Partner (as
holder of the General Partner Interest), the amount that bears
the same ratio to
A-13
such additional Book Basis Derivative Items as the General
Partners Remaining Net Positive Adjustments as of the end
of such period bears to the Aggregate Remaining Net Positive
Adjustment as of that time, and (iii) with respect to the
Partners holding Incentive Distribution Rights, the amount that
bears the same ratio to such Additional Book Basis Derivative
Items as the Remaining Net Positive Adjustments of the Partners
holding the Incentive Distribution Rights as of the end of such
period bears to the Aggregate Remaining Net Positive Adjustments
as of that time.
Special Approval means approval by a majority
of the members of the Conflicts Committee.
Subordinated Unit means a Unit representing a
fractional part of the Partnership Interests of all Limited
Partners and Assignees and having the rights and obligations
specified with respect to Subordinated Units in this Agreement.
The term Subordinated Unit as used herein does not
refer to a Common Unit. A Subordinated Unit that is convertible
into a Common Unit shall not constitute a Common Unit until such
conversion occurs.
Subordination Period means the period
commencing on the Closing Date and ending on the first to occur
of the following dates:
|
|
|
(a) the first day of any Quarter beginning after
March 31, 2010 in respect of which (i)
(A) distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus
on each of the Outstanding Common Units and Subordinated Units
and any other Outstanding Units that are senior or equal in
right of distribution to the Subordinated Units with respect to
each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping four-Quarter
periods immediately preceding such date equaled or exceeded the
sum of the Minimum Quarterly Distribution on all Outstanding
Common Units and Subordinated Units and any other Outstanding
Units that are senior or equal in right of distribution to the
Subordinated Units during such periods and (B) the Adjusted
Operating Surplus generated during each of the three
consecutive, non-overlapping four-Quarter periods immediately
preceding such date equaled or exceeded the sum of the Minimum
Quarterly Distribution on all of the Common Units and
Subordinated Units and any other Units that are senior or equal
in right of distribution to the Subordinated Units that were
Outstanding during such periods on a Fully Diluted Basis, plus
the related distribution on the General Partner Interest, during
such periods and (ii) there are no Cumulative Common Unit
Arrearages; and |
|
|
(b) the date on which the General Partner is removed as
general partner of the Partnership upon the requisite vote by
holders of Outstanding Units under circumstances where Cause
does not exist and Units held by the General Partner and its
Affiliates are not voted in favor of such removal. |
For purposes of determining whether the test in
subclause (a)(i)(B) above has been satisfied, Adjusted
Operating Surplus will be adjusted upwards or downwards if the
Conflicts Committee determines in good faith that the amount of
Estimated Maintenance Capital Expenditures used in the
determination of Adjusted Operating Surplus in
subclause (a)(i)(B) was materially incorrect, based on
circumstances prevailing at the time of original determination
of Estimated Maintenance Capital Expenditures, for any one or
more of the preceding three four-Quarter periods.
Subsidiary means, with respect to any Person,
(a) a corporation of which more than 50% of the voting
power of shares entitled (without regard to the occurrence of
any contingency) to vote in the election of directors or other
governing body of such corporation is owned, directly or
indirectly, at the date of determination, by such Person, by one
or more Subsidiaries of such Person or a combination thereof,
(b) a partnership (whether general or limited) in which
such Person or a Subsidiary of such Person is, at the date of
determination, a general or limited partner of such partnership,
but only if more than 50% of the partnership interests of such
partnership (considering all of the partnership interests of the
partnership as a single class) is owned, directly or indirectly,
at the date of determination, by such Person, by one or more
Subsidiaries of such Person, or a combination thereof, or
(c) any other Person (other than a corporation or a
partnership) in which such Person, one or more Subsidiaries of
such Person, or a combination thereof, directly or indirectly,
at the date of determination, has (i) at least a majority
ownership interest or (ii) the power to elect or direct the
election of a majority of the directors or other governing body
of such Person.
A-14
Substituted Limited Partner means a Person
who is admitted as a Limited Partner to the Partnership pursuant
to Section 10.2 in place of and with all the rights of a
Limited Partner and who is shown as a Limited Partner on the
books and records of the Partnership.
Teekay Restricted Businesses has the meaning
assigned to such term in the Omnibus Agreement.
Third Liquidation Target Amount has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 6.1(c)(i)(F).
Third Target Distribution means $0.65 per
unit per Quarter (or, with respect to the period commencing on
the Closing Date and ending on June 30, 2005, it means the
product of $0.65 multiplied by a fraction of which the numerator
is equal to the number of days in such period and of which the
denominator is 91), subject to adjustment in accordance with
Sections 6.6 and 6.9.
Trading Day has the meaning assigned to such
term in Section 15.1(a).
Transfer has the meaning assigned to such
term in Section 4.4(a).
Transfer Agent means such bank, trust company
or other Person (including the General Partner or one of its
Affiliates) as shall be appointed from time to time by the
Partnership to act as registrar and transfer agent for the
Common Units; provided, that if no Transfer Agent is
specifically designated for any other Partnership Securities,
the General Partner shall act in such capacity.
Transfer Application means an application and
agreement for transfer of Units in the form set forth on the
back of a Certificate or in a form substantially to the same
effect in a separate instrument.
Underwriter means each Person named as an
underwriter in Schedule I to the Underwriting Agreement who
purchases Common Units pursuant thereto.
Underwriting Agreement means the Underwriting
Agreement dated May 4, 2005 among the Underwriters, the
Partnership, the General Partner, the Operating Company, and
Teekay Shipping Corporation, providing for the purchase of
Common Units by such Underwriters.
Unit means a Partnership Security that is
designated as a Unit and shall include Common Units
and Subordinated Units but shall not include (i) a General
Partner Interest or (ii) Incentive Distribution Rights.
Unitholders means the holders of Common Units
and Subordinated Units.
Unit Majority means, during the Subordination
Period, at least a majority of the Outstanding Common Units
(excluding Common Units owned by the General Partner and its
Affiliates) voting as a class and at least a majority of the
Outstanding Subordinated Units voting as a class, and after the
end of the Subordination Period, at least a majority of the
Outstanding Common Units.
Unit Register means the register of the
Partnership for the registration and transfer of Limited
Partnership Interests as provided in Section 4.5.
Unpaid MQD has the meaning assigned to such
term in Section 6.1(c)(i)(B).
Unrealized Gain attributable to any item of
Partnership property means, as of any date of determination, the
excess, if any, of (a) the fair market value of such
property as of such date (as determined under
Section 5.5(d)) over (b) the Carrying Value of such
property as of such date (prior to any adjustment to be made
pursuant to Section 5.5(d) as of such date).
Unrealized Loss attributable to any item of
Partnership property means, as of any date of determination, the
excess, if any, of (a) the Carrying Value of such property
as of such date (prior to any adjustment to be made pursuant to
Section 5.5(d) as of such date) over (b) the fair
market value of such property as of such date (as determined
under Section 5.5(d)).
Unrecovered Capital means at any time, with
respect to a Unit, the Initial Unit Price less the sum of all
distributions constituting Capital Surplus theretofore made in
respect of an Initial Common Unit and any distributions of cash
(or the Net Agreed Value of any distributions in kind) in
connection with the
A-15
dissolution and liquidation of the Partnership theretofore made
in respect of an Initial Common Unit, adjusted as the General
Partner determines to be appropriate to give effect to any
distribution, subdivision or combination of such Units.
U.S. GAAP means United States generally
accepted accounting principles consistently applied.
Withdrawal Opinion of Counsel has the meaning
assigned to such term in Section 11.1(b).
Working Capital Borrowings means borrowings
used solely for working capital purposes or to pay distributions
to Partners made pursuant to a credit facility or other
arrangement to the extent such borrowings are required to be
reduced to a relatively small amount each year (or for the year
in which the Initial Offering is consummated, the 12-month
period beginning on the Closing Date) for an economically
meaningful period of time.
Section 1.2 Construction.
Unless the context requires otherwise: (a) any pronoun used
in this Agreement shall include the corresponding masculine,
feminine or neuter forms, and the singular form of nouns,
pronouns and verbs shall include the plural and vice versa;
(b) references to Articles and Sections refer to Articles
and Sections of this Agreement; and (c) the term
include or includes means includes,
without limitation, and including means including,
without limitation.
ARTICLE II
Organization
Section 2.1 Formation.
The General Partner and the Organizational Limited Partner have
previously formed the Partnership as a limited partnership
pursuant to the provisions of the Marshall Islands Act and
hereby amend and restate the original Agreement of Limited
Partnership of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. in its entirety. This
amendment and restatement shall become effective on the date of
this Agreement. Except as expressly provided to the contrary in
this Agreement, the rights, duties (including fiduciary duties),
liabilities and obligations of the Partners and the
administration, dissolution and termination of the Partnership
shall be governed by the Marshall Islands Act. All
Partnership Interests shall constitute personal property of
the owner thereof for all purposes and a Partner has no interest
in specific Partnership property.
Section 2.2 Name.
The name of the Partnership shall be Teekay LNG Partners
L.P. The Partnerships business may be conducted
under any other name or names as determined by the General
Partner, including the name of the General Partner. The words
Limited Partnership or the letters L.P.,
or similar words or letters shall be included in the
Partnerships name where necessary for the purpose of
complying with the laws of any jurisdiction that so requires.
The General Partner may change the name of the Partnership at
any time and from time to time and shall notify the Limited
Partners of such change in the next regular communication to the
Limited Partners.
Section 2.3 Registered
Office; Registered Agent; Principal Office; Other Offices.
Unless and until changed by the General Partner, the registered
office of the Partnership in the Marshall Islands shall be
located at Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Island, Ajeltake
Road, Majuro, Marshall Islands MH 96960, and the registered
agent for service of process on the Partnership in the Marshall
Islands at such registered office shall be The Trust Company of
the Marshall Islands, Inc. The principal office of the
Partnership shall be located at Teekay Shipping Limited, TK
House, Bayside Executive Park, West Bay Street & Blake Road,
P.O. Box AP-59212, Nassau, Commonwealth of the Bahamas or such
other place as the General Partner may from time to time
designate by notice to the Limited Partners. The Partnership may
maintain offices at such other place or places within or outside
the Marshall Islands as the General Partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate. The address of the
A-16
General Partner shall be TK House, Bayside Executive Park, West
Bay Street and Blake Road, P.O. Box AP-59212, Nassau,
Commonwealth of the Bahamas or such other place as the General
Partner may from time to time designate by notice to the Limited
Partners.
Section 2.4 Purpose
and Business.
The purpose and nature of the business to be conducted by the
Partnership shall be to (a)engage directly in, or enter into or
form any corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited
liability company or other arrangement to engage indirectly in,
any business activity that is approved by the General Partner
and that lawfully may be conducted by a limited partnership
organized pursuant to the Marshall Islands Act and, in
connection therewith, to exercise all of the rights and powers
conferred upon the Partnership pursuant to the agreements
relating to such business activity, and (b) do anything
necessary or appropriate to the foregoing, including the making
of capital contributions or loans to a Group Member;
provided, however, that the General Partner shall not
cause the Partnership to engage, directly or indirectly, in any
business activity that the General Partner determines would
cause the Partnership to be treated as an association taxable as
a corporation or otherwise taxable as an entity for United
States federal income tax purposes. The General Partner shall
have no duty or obligation to propose or approve, and may
decline to propose or approve, the conduct by the Partnership of
any business free of any fiduciary duty or obligation whatsoever
to the Partnership, any Limited Partner or Assignee and, in
declining to so propose or approve, shall not be required to act
in good faith or pursuant to any other standard imposed by this
Agreement, any Group Member Agreement, any other agreement
contemplated hereby or under the Marshall Islands Act or any
other law, rule or regulation.
Section 2.5 Powers.
The Partnership shall be empowered to do any and all acts and
things necessary and appropriate for the furtherance and
accomplishment of the purposes and business described in
Section 2.4 and for the protection and benefit of the
Partnership.
Section 2.6 Power
of Attorney.
(a) Each Limited Partner and each Assignee hereby
constitutes and appoints the General Partner and, if a
Liquidator shall have been selected pursuant to
Section 12.3, the Liquidator (and any successor to the
Liquidator by merger, transfer, assignment, election or
otherwise) and each of their authorized officers and
attorneys-in-fact, as the case may be, with full power of
substitution, as his true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact,
with full power and authority in his name, place and stead, to:
|
|
|
(i) execute, swear to, acknowledge, deliver, file and
record in the appropriate public offices (A) all
certificates, documents and other instruments (including this
Agreement and the Certificate of Limited Partnership and all
amendments or restatements hereof or thereof) that the General
Partner or the Liquidator determines to be necessary or
appropriate to form, qualify or continue the existence or
qualification of the Partnership as a limited partnership (or a
partnership in which the limited partners have limited
liability) in the Marshall Islands and in all other
jurisdictions in which the Partnership may conduct business or
own property; (B) all certificates, documents and other
instruments that the General Partner or the Liquidator
determines to be necessary or appropriate to reflect, in
accordance with its terms, any amendment, change, modification
or restatement of this Agreement; (C) all certificates,
documents and other instruments (including conveyances and a
certificate of cancellation) that the General Partner or the
Liquidator determines to be necessary or appropriate to reflect
the dissolution and liquidation of the Partnership pursuant to
the terms of this Agreement; (D) all certificates,
documents and other instruments relating to the admission,
withdrawal, removal or substitution of any Partner pursuant to,
or other events described in, Articles IV, X, XI or XII;
(E) all certificates, documents and other instruments
relating to the determination of the rights, preferences and
privileges of any class or series of Partnership Securities
issued pursuant to Section 5.6; and (F) all
certificates, documents and other instruments (including
agreements and a certificate of merger) relating to a merger,
consolidation or conversion of the Partnership pursuant to
Article XIV; and |
A-17
|
|
|
(ii) execute, swear to, acknowledge, deliver, file and
record all ballots, consents, approvals, waivers, certificates,
documents and other instruments that the General Partner or the
Liquidator determines to be necessary or appropriate to
(A) make, evidence, give, confirm or ratify any vote,
consent, approval, agreement or other action that is made or
given by the Partners hereunder or is consistent with the terms
of this Agreement or (B) effectuate the terms or intent of
this Agreement; provided, that when required by
Section 13.3 or any other provision of this Agreement that
establishes a percentage of the Limited Partners or of the
Limited Partners of any class or series required to take any
action, the General Partner and the Liquidator may exercise the
power of attorney made in this Section 2.6(a)(ii) only
after the necessary vote, consent or approval of the Limited
Partners or of the Limited Partners of such class or series, as
applicable. |
Nothing contained in this Section 2.6(a) shall be construed
as authorizing the General Partner to amend this Agreement
except in accordance with Article XIII or as may be
otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement.
(b) The foregoing power of attorney is hereby declared to
be irrevocable and a power coupled with an interest, and it
shall survive and, to the maximum extent permitted by law, not
be affected by the subsequent death, incompetency, disability,
incapacity, dissolution, bankruptcy or termination of any
Limited Partner or Assignee and the transfer of all or any
portion of such Limited Partners or Assignees
Partnership Interest and shall extend to such Limited
Partners or Assignees heirs, successors, assigns and
personal representatives. Each such Limited Partner or Assignee
hereby agrees to be bound by any representation made by the
General Partner or the Liquidator acting in good faith pursuant
to such power of attorney; and each such Limited Partner or
Assignee, to the maximum extent permitted by law, hereby waives
any and all defenses that may be available to contest, negate or
disaffirm the action of the General Partner or the Liquidator
taken in good faith under such power of attorney. Each Limited
Partner or Assignee shall execute and deliver to the General
Partner or the Liquidator, within 15 days after receipt of
the request therefor, such further designation, powers of
attorney and other instruments as the General Partner or the
Liquidator determines to be necessary or appropriate to
effectuate this Agreement and the purposes of the Partnership.
Section 2.7 Term.
The term of the Partnership commenced upon the filing of the
Certificate of Limited Partnership in accordance with the
Marshall Islands Act and shall continue in existence until the
dissolution of the Partnership in accordance with the provisions
of Article XII. The existence of the Partnership as a
separate legal entity shall continue until the cancellation of
the Certificate of Limited Partnership as provided in the
Marshall Islands Act.
Section 2.8 Title
to Partnership Assets.
Title to Partnership assets, whether real, personal or mixed and
whether tangible or intangible, shall be deemed to be owned by
the Partnership as an entity, and no Partner or Assignee,
individually or collectively, shall have any ownership interest
in such Partnership assets or any portion thereof. Title to any
or all of the Partnership assets may be held in the name of the
Partnership, the General Partner, one or more of its Affiliates
or one or more nominees, as the General Partner may determine.
The General Partner hereby declares and warrants that any
Partnership assets for which record title is held in the name of
the General Partner or one or more of its Affiliates or one or
more nominees shall be held by the General Partner or such
Affiliate or nominee for the use and benefit of the Partnership
in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement;
provided, however, that the General Partner shall use
reasonable efforts to cause record title to such assets (other
than those assets in respect of which the General Partner
determines that the expense and difficulty of conveyancing makes
transfer of record title to the Partnership impracticable) to be
vested in the Partnership as soon as reasonably practicable;
provided, further, that, prior to the withdrawal or
removal of the General Partner or as soon thereafter as
practicable, the General Partner shall use reasonable efforts to
effect the transfer of record title to the Partnership and,
prior to any such transfer, will provide for the use of such
assets in a manner satisfactory to the General Partner. All
A-18
Partnership assets shall be recorded as the property of the
Partnership in its books and records, irrespective of the name
in which record title to such Partnership assets is held.
ARTICLE III
Rights of Limited Partners
Section 3.1 Limitation
of Liability.
The Limited Partners and the Assignees shall have no liability
under this Agreement except as expressly provided in this
Agreement or the Marshall Islands Act.
Section 3.2 Management
of Business.
No Limited Partner or Assignee, in its capacity as such, shall
participate in the operation, management or control (within the
meaning of the Marshall Islands Act) of the Partnerships
business, transact any business in the Partnerships name
or have the power to sign documents for or otherwise bind the
Partnership. Any action taken by any Affiliate of the General
Partner or any officer, director, employee, manager, member,
general partner, agent or trustee of the General Partner or any
of its Affiliates, or any officer, director, employee, member,
general partner, agent or trustee of a Group Member, in its
capacity as such, shall not be deemed to be participation in the
control of the business of the Partnership by a limited partner
of the Partnership (within the meaning of Section 30 of the
Marshall Islands Act) and shall not affect, impair or eliminate
the limitations on the liability of the Limited Partners or
Assignees under this Agreement.
Section 3.3 Outside
Activities of the Limited Partners.
Subject to the provisions of Section 7.5 and the Omnibus
Agreement, which shall continue to be applicable to the Persons
referred to therein, regardless of whether such Persons shall
also be Limited Partners or Assignees, any Limited Partner or
Assignee shall be entitled to and may have business interests
and engage in business activities in addition to those relating
to the Partnership, including business interests and activities
in direct competition with the Partnership Group. Neither the
Partnership nor any of the other Partners or Assignees shall
have any rights by virtue of this Agreement in any business
ventures of any Limited Partner or Assignee.
Section 3.4 Rights
of Limited Partners.
(a) In addition to other rights provided by this Agreement
or by applicable law, and except as limited by
Section 3.4(b), each Limited Partner shall have the right,
for a purpose reasonably related to such Limited Partners
interest as a Limited Partner in the Partnership, upon
reasonable written demand and at such Limited Partners own
expense:
|
|
|
(i) promptly after becoming available, to obtain a copy of
the Partnerships foreign, federal, state and local income
tax returns for each year; |
|
|
(ii) to have furnished to him a current list of the name
and last known business, residence or mailing address of each
Partner; |
|
|
(iii) to obtain true and full information regarding the
amount of cash and a description and statement of the Net Agreed
Value of any other Capital Contribution by each Partner and
which each Partner has agreed to contribute in the future, and
the date on which each became a Partner; |
|
|
(iv) to have furnished to him a copy of this Agreement and
the Certificate of Limited Partnership and all amendments
thereto, together with a copy of the executed copies of all
powers of attorney pursuant to which this Agreement, the
Certificate of Limited Partnership and all amendments thereto
have been executed; |
|
|
(v) to obtain true and full information regarding the
status of the business and financial condition of the
Partnership Group; and |
A-19
|
|
|
(vi) to obtain such other information regarding the affairs
of the Partnership as is just and reasonable. |
(b) The General Partner may keep confidential from the
Limited Partners and Assignees, for such period of time as the
General Partner deems reasonable, (i) any information that
the General Partner reasonably believes to be in the nature of
trade secrets or (ii) other information the disclosure of
which the General Partner in good faith believes (A) is not
in the best interests of the Partnership Group, (B) could
damage the Partnership Group or (C) that any Group Member
is required by law or by agreement with any third party to keep
confidential (other than agreements with Affiliates of the
Partnership the primary purpose of which is to circumvent the
obligations set forth in this Section 3.4).
ARTICLE IV
Certificates; Record
Holders; Transfer of Partnership Interests;
Redemption of Partnership
Interests
Section 4.1 Certificates.
Upon the Partnerships issuance of Common Units or
Subordinated Units to any Person, the Partnership shall issue,
upon the request of such Person, one or more Certificates in the
name of such Person evidencing the number of such Units being so
issued. In addition, (a) upon the General Partners
request, the Partnership shall issue to it one or more
Certificates in the name of the General Partner evidencing its
interests in the Partnership and (b) upon the request of
any Person owning Incentive Distribution Rights or any other
Partnership Securities other than Common Units or Subordinated
Units, the Partnership shall issue to such Person one or more
certificates evidencing such Incentive Distribution Rights or
other Partnership Securities other than Common Units or
Subordinated Units. Certificates shall be executed on behalf of
the Partnership by the Chairman of the Board, President or any
Executive Vice President or Vice President and the Chief
Financial Officer or the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of
the General Partner. No Common Unit Certificate shall be valid
for any purpose until it has been countersigned by the Transfer
Agent; provided, however, that if the General Partner
elects to issue Common Units in global form, the Common Unit
Certificates shall be valid upon receipt of a certificate from
the Transfer Agent certifying that the Common Units have been
duly registered in accordance with the directions of the
Partnership. Subject to the requirements of Section 6.7(b),
the Partners holding Certificates evidencing Subordinated Units
may exchange such Certificates for Certificates evidencing
Common Units on or after the date on which such Subordinated
Units are converted into Common Units pursuant to the terms of
Section 5.8.
Section 4.2 Mutilated,
Destroyed, Lost or Stolen Certificates.
(a) If any mutilated Certificate is surrendered to the
Transfer Agent, the appropriate officers of the General Partner
on behalf of the Partnership shall execute, and the Transfer
Agent shall countersign and deliver in exchange therefor, a new
Certificate evidencing the same number and type of Partnership
Securities as the Certificate so surrendered.
(b) The appropriate officers of the General Partner on
behalf of the Partnership shall execute and deliver, and the
Transfer Agent shall countersign, a new Certificate in place of
any Certificate previously issued if the Record Holder of the
Certificate:
|
|
|
(i) makes proof by affidavit, in form and substance
satisfactory to the General Partner, that a previously issued
Certificate has been lost, destroyed or stolen; |
|
|
(ii) requests the issuance of a new Certificate before the
General Partner has notice that the Certificate has been
acquired by a purchaser for value in good faith and without
notice of an adverse claim; |
|
|
(iii) if requested by the General Partner, delivers to the
General Partner a bond, in form and substance satisfactory to
the General Partner, with surety or sureties and with fixed or
open penalty as |
A-20
|
|
|
the General Partner may direct to indemnify the Partnership, the
Partners, the General Partner and the Transfer Agent against any
claim that may be made on account of the alleged loss,
destruction or theft of the Certificate; and |
|
|
(iv) satisfies any other reasonable requirements imposed by
the General Partner. |
If a Limited Partner or Assignee fails to notify the General
Partner within a reasonable period of time after he has notice
of the loss, destruction or theft of a Certificate, and a
transfer of the Limited Partner Interests represented by the
Certificate is registered before the Partnership, the General
Partner or the Transfer Agent receives such notification, the
Limited Partner or Assignee shall be precluded from making any
claim against the Partnership, the General Partner or the
Transfer Agent for such transfer or for a new Certificate.
(c) As a condition to the issuance of any new Certificate
under this Section 4.2, the General Partner may require the
payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other
governmental charge that may be imposed in relation thereto and
any other expenses (including the fees and expenses of the
Transfer Agent) reasonably connected therewith.
Section 4.3 Record
Holders.
The Partnership shall be entitled to recognize the Record Holder
as the Partner or Assignee with respect to any Partnership
Interest and, accordingly, shall not be bound to recognize any
equitable or other claim to, or interest in, such Partnership
Interest on the part of any other Person, regardless of whether
the Partnership shall have actual or other notice thereof,
except as otherwise provided by law or any applicable rule,
regulation, guideline or requirement of any National Securities
Exchange on which such Partnership Interests are listed. Without
limiting the foregoing, when a Person (such as a broker, dealer,
bank, trust company or clearing corporation or an agent of any
of the foregoing) is acting as nominee, agent or in some other
representative capacity for another Person in acquiring and/or
holding Partnership Interests, as between the Partnership
on the one hand, and such other Persons on the other, such
representative Person (a) shall be the Partner or Assignee
(as the case may be) of record and beneficially, (b) must
execute and deliver a Transfer Application and (c) shall be
bound by this Agreement and shall have the rights and
obligations of a Partner or Assignee (as the case may be)
hereunder and as, and to the extent, provided for herein.
Section 4.4 Transfer
Generally.
(a) The term transfer, when used in this
Agreement with respect to a Partnership Interest, shall be
deemed to refer to a transaction (i) by which the General
Partner assigns its General Partner Interest to another Person
or by which a holder of Incentive Distribution Rights assigns
its Incentive Distribution Rights to another Person, and
includes a sale, assignment, gift, pledge, encumbrance,
hypothecation, mortgage, exchange or any other disposition by
law or otherwise or (ii) by which the holder of a Limited
Partner Interest (other than an Incentive Distribution Right)
assigns such Limited Partner Interest to another Person who is
or becomes a Limited Partner or an Assignee, and includes a
sale, assignment, gift, exchange or any other disposition by law
or otherwise, including any transfer upon foreclosure of any
pledge, encumbrance, hypothecation or mortgage.
(b) No Partnership Interest shall be transferred, in whole
or in part, except in accordance with the terms and conditions
set forth in this Article IV. Any transfer or purported
transfer of a Partnership Interest not made in accordance with
this Article IV shall be null and void.
(c) Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed
to prevent a disposition by any stockholder, member, partner or
other owner of the General Partner of any or all of the shares
of stock, membership interests, partnership interests or other
ownership interests in the General Partner.
Section 4.5 Registration
and Transfer of Limited Partner Interests.
(a) The General Partner shall keep or cause to be kept on
behalf of the Partnership a register in which, subject to such
reasonable regulations as it may prescribe and subject to the
provisions of
A-21
Section 4.5(b), the Partnership will provide for the
registration and transfer of Limited Partner Interests. The
Transfer Agent is hereby appointed registrar and transfer agent
for the purpose of registering Common Units and transfers of
such Common Units as herein provided. The Partnership shall not
recognize transfers of Certificates evidencing Limited Partner
Interests unless such transfers are effected in the manner
described in this Section 4.5. Upon surrender of a
Certificate for registration of transfer of any Limited Partner
Interests evidenced by a Certificate, and subject to the
provisions of Section 4.5(b), the appropriate officers of
the General Partner on behalf of the Partnership shall execute
and deliver, and in the case of Common Units, the Transfer Agent
shall countersign and deliver, in the name of the holder or the
designated transferee or transferees, as required pursuant to
the holders instructions, one or more new Certificates
evidencing the same aggregate number and type of Limited Partner
Interests as was evidenced by the Certificate so surrendered.
(b) The General Partner shall not recognize any transfer of
Limited Partner Interests until the Certificates evidencing such
Limited Partner Interests are surrendered for registration of
transfer and such Certificates are accompanied by a Transfer
Application duly executed by the transferee (or the
transferees attorney-in-fact duly authorized in writing).
No charge shall be imposed by the General Partner for such
transfer; provided, that as a condition to the issuance
of any new Certificate under this Section 4.5, the General
Partner may require the payment of a sum sufficient to cover any
tax or other governmental charge that may be imposed with
respect thereto.
(c) Limited Partner Interests may be transferred only in
the manner described in this Section 4.5. The transfer of
any Limited Partner Interests and the admission of any new
Limited Partner shall not constitute an amendment to this
Agreement.
(d) Until admitted as a Substituted Limited Partner
pursuant to Section 10.2, the Record Holder of a Limited
Partner Interest shall be an Assignee in respect of such Limited
Partner Interest. Limited Partners may include custodians,
nominees or any other individual or entity in its own or any
representative capacity.
(e) A transferee of a Limited Partner Interest who has
completed and delivered a Transfer Application shall be deemed
to have (i) requested admission as a Substituted Limited
Partner, (ii) agreed to comply with and be bound by and to
have executed this Agreement, (iii) represented and
warranted that such transferee has the right, power and
authority and, if an individual, the capacity to enter into this
Agreement, (iv) granted the powers of attorney set forth in
this Agreement and (v) given the consents and approvals and
made the waivers contained in this Agreement.
(f) The General Partner and its Affiliates shall have the
right at any time to transfer their Subordinated Units and
Common Units (whether issued upon conversion of the Subordinated
Units or otherwise) to one or more Persons.
Section 4.6 Transfer
of the General Partners General Partner Interest.
(a) Subject to Section 4.6(c) below, prior to
March 31, 2015, the General Partner shall not transfer all
or any part of its General Partner Interest to a Person unless
such transfer (i) has been approved by the prior written
consent or vote of the holders of at least a majority of the
Outstanding Common Units (excluding Common Units held by the
General Partner and its Affiliates) or (ii) is of all, but
not less than all, of its General Partner Interest to
(A) an Affiliate of the General Partner (other than an
individual) or (B) another Person (other than an
individual) in connection with the transfer by the General
Partner of all or substantially all of its assets to such other
Person.
(b) Subject to Section 4.6(c) below, on or after
March 31, 2015, the General Partner may transfer all or any
of its General Partner Interest without Unitholder approval.
(c) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no
transfer by the General Partner of all or any part of its
General Partner Interest to another Person shall be permitted
unless (i) the transferee agrees to assume the rights and
duties of the General Partner under this Agreement and to be
bound by the provisions of this Agreement, (ii) the
Partnership receives an Opinion of Counsel that such transfer
would
A-22
not result in the loss of limited liability of any Limited
Partner or of any limited partner or member of any other Group
Member or cause the Partnership or any other Group Member to be
treated as an association taxable as a corporation or otherwise
to be taxed as an entity for United States federal income tax
purposes (to the extent not already so treated or taxed) and
(iii) such transferee also agrees to purchase all (or the
appropriate portion thereof, if applicable) of the partnership
or membership interest of the General Partner as the general
partner or managing member, if any, of each other Group Member.
In the case of a transfer pursuant to and in compliance with
this Section 4.6, the transferee or successor (as the case
may be) shall, subject to compliance with the terms of
Section 10.3, be admitted to the Partnership as the General
Partner immediately prior to the transfer of the General Partner
Interest, and the business of the Partnership shall continue
without dissolution.
Section 4.7 Transfer
of Incentive Distribution Rights.
Prior to March 31, 2015, a holder of Incentive Distribution
Rights may transfer any or all of the Incentive Distribution
Rights held by such holder without any consent of the
Unitholders to (a) an Affiliate of such holder (other than
an individual) or (b) another Person (other than an
individual) in connection with (i) the merger or
consolidation of such holder of Incentive Distribution Rights
with or into such other Person or (ii) the transfer by such
holder of all or substantially all of its assets to such other
Person. Any other transfer of the Incentive Distribution Rights
prior to March 31, 2015 shall require the prior approval of
holders of at least a majority of the Outstanding Common Units
(excluding Common Units held by the General Partner and its
Affiliates). On or after March 31, 2015, the General
Partner or any other holder of Incentive Distribution Rights may
transfer any or all of its Incentive Distribution Rights without
Unitholder approval. Notwithstanding anything herein to the
contrary, no transfer of Incentive Distribution Rights to
another Person shall be permitted unless the transferee agrees
to be bound by the provisions of this Agreement.
Section 4.8 Restrictions
on Transfers.
(a) Except as provided in Section 4.8(d) below, but
notwithstanding the other provisions of this Article IV, no
transfer of any Partnership Interests shall be made if such
transfer would (i) violate the then applicable federal or
state securities laws or rules and regulations of the
Commission, any state securities commission or any other
governmental authority with jurisdiction over such transfer,
(ii) terminate the existence or qualification of the
Partnership or any Group Member under the laws of the
jurisdiction of its formation or (iii) cause the
Partnership or any Group Member to be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation or otherwise to be taxed as an entity
for United States federal income tax purposes (to the extent not
already so treated or taxed).
(b) The General Partner may impose restrictions on the
transfer of Partnership Interests if it receives an Opinion
of Counsel that such restrictions are necessary to avoid a
significant risk of any Group Member becoming taxable as a
corporation or otherwise becoming taxable as an entity for
United States federal income tax purposes. The General Partner
may impose such restrictions by amending this Agreement;
provided, however, that any amendment that would result
in the delisting or suspension of trading of any class of
Limited Partner Interests on the principal National Securities
Exchange on which such class of Limited Partner Interests is
then listed must be approved, prior to such amendment being
effected, by the holders of at least a majority of the
Outstanding Limited Partner Interests of such class.
(c) The transfer of a Subordinated Unit that has converted
into a Common Unit shall be subject to the restrictions imposed
by Section 6.7(b).
(d) Nothing contained in this Article IV, or elsewhere
in this Agreement, shall preclude the settlement of any
transactions involving Partnership Interests entered into
through the facilities of any National Securities Exchange on
which such Partnership Interests are listed for trading.
A-23
ARTICLE V
Capital Contributions and
Issuance of Partnership Interests
Section 5.1 Organizational
Contributions.
(a) In connection with the formation of the Partnership under
the Marshall Islands Act, the General Partner made an initial
Capital Contribution to the Partnership in the amount of $20.00,
for a 2% General Partner Interest in the Partnership and has
been admitted as the General Partner of the Partnership, and the
Organizational Limited Partner made an initial Capital
Contribution to the Partnership in the amount of $980 for a 98%
Limited Partner Interest in the Partnership and has been
admitted as a Limited Partner of the Partnership. Ninety-eight
percent of any interest or other profit that may have resulted
from the investment or other use of such initial Capital
Contributions shall be allocated and distributed to the
Organizational Limited Partner, and the balance thereof shall be
allocated and distributed to the General Partner.
(b) Prior to the Closing Date (i) the General Partner
contributed all of its ownership interest in the Operating
Company to the Partnership in exchange for (A) a
continuation of its 2% General Partner Interest and (B) the
Incentive Distribution Rights and (ii) Teekay Shipping
Corporation contributed all of its ownership interest in the
Operating Company, in exchange for a continuation of its 98%
limited partner interest and a promissory note.
Section 5.2 Contributions
by the General Partner and its Affiliates.
(a) On the Closing Date and pursuant to the Contribution
Agreement, Teekay Shipping Corporations 98% initial
limited partner interest shall be converted into
(A) 8,734,572 Common Units and (B) 14,734,572 Subordinated
Units.
(b) Upon the issuance of any additional Limited Partner
Interests by the Partnership (other than the issuance of the
Common Units issued in the Initial Offering and other than the
issuance of the Common Units issued pursuant to the
Over-Allotment Option), the General Partner shall be required to
make additional Capital Contributions equal to (i) 2/98ths
of any amount contributed to the Partnership by the Limited
Partners in exchange for the additional Limited Partner
Interests issued to such Limited Partners less (ii) 2/98ths
of any amount so contributed by such Limited Partners that is
used by the Partnership concurrently with such contribution to
redeem or repurchase from any Person outstanding Limited Partner
Interests of the same class as the Limited Partner Interests
issued to such Limited Partners at a price per Limited Partner
Interest equal to the net proceeds per Limited Partner Interest,
before expenses, that the Partnership receives from such
issuances. Except as set forth in the immediately preceding
sentence and Article XII, the General Partner shall not be
obligated to make any additional Capital Contributions to the
Partnership.
Section 5.3 Contributions
by Initial Limited Partners and Distributions to the General
Partner and its Affiliates.
(a) On the Closing Date and pursuant to the Underwriting
Agreement, each Underwriter shall contribute to the Partnership
cash in an amount equal to the Issue Price per Initial Common
Unit, multiplied by the number of Common Units specified in the
Underwriting Agreement to be purchased by such Underwriter at
the Closing Date. In exchange for such Capital Contributions by
the Underwriters, the Partnership shall issue Common Units to
each Underwriter on whose behalf such Capital Contribution is
made in an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing
(i) the cash contribution to the Partnership by or on
behalf of such Underwriter by (ii) the Issue Price per
Initial Common Unit.
(b) Upon the exercise of the Over-Allotment Option, each
Underwriter shall contribute to the Partnership cash in an
amount equal to the Issue Price per Initial Common Unit,
multiplied by the
A-24
number of Common Units to be purchased by such Underwriter at
the Option Closing Date. In exchange for such Capital
Contributions by the Underwriters, the Partnership shall issue
Common Units to each Underwriter on whose behalf such Capital
Contribution is made in an amount equal to the quotient obtained
by dividing (i) the cash contributions to the Partnership
by or on behalf of such Underwriter by (ii) the Issue Price
per Initial Common Unit.
(c) No Limited Partner Interests will be issued or issuable
as of or at the Closing Date other than (i) the Common
Units issuable pursuant to subparagraph (a) hereof in
aggregate number equal to 6,000,000, (ii) the Option
Units as such term is used in the Underwriting Agreement
in an aggregate number up to 900,000 issuable upon exercise of
the Over-Allotment Option pursuant to
subparagraph (c) hereof, (iii) the 14,734,572
Subordinated Units issuable to pursuant to Section 5.2
hereof, (iv) the 8,734,572 Common Units issuable
pursuant to Section 5.2 hereof, and (v) the Incentive
Distribution Rights.
Section 5.4 Interest
and Withdrawal.
No interest shall be paid by the Partnership on Capital
Contributions. No Partner or Assignee shall be entitled to the
withdrawal or return of its Capital Contribution, except to the
extent, if any, that distributions made pursuant to this
Agreement or upon termination of the Partnership may be
considered and permitted as such by law and then only to the
extent provided for in this Agreement. Except to the extent
expressly provided in this Agreement, no Partner or Assignee
shall have priority over any other Partner or Assignee either as
to the return of Capital Contributions or as to profits, losses
or distributions.
Section 5.5 Capital
Accounts.
(a) The Partnership shall maintain for each Partner (or a
beneficial owner of Partnership Interests held by a nominee
in any case in which the nominee has furnished the identity of
such owner to the Partnership in accordance with
Section 6031(c) of the Code or any other method acceptable
to the General Partner) owning a Partnership Interest a
separate Capital Account with respect to such
Partnership Interest in accordance with the rules of
Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv). Such
Capital Account shall be increased by (i) the amount of all
Capital Contributions made to the Partnership with respect to
such Partnership Interest and (ii) all items of
Partnership income and gain (including, without limitation,
income and gain exempt from tax) computed in accordance with
Section 5.5(b) and allocated with respect to such
Partnership Interest pursuant to Section 6.1, and
decreased by (x) the amount of cash or Net Agreed Value of
all actual and deemed distributions of cash or property made
with respect to such Partnership Interest and (y) all
items of Partnership deduction and loss computed in accordance
with Section 5.5(b) and allocated with respect to such
Partnership Interest pursuant to Section 6.1.
(b) For purposes of computing the amount of any item of
income, gain, loss or deduction which is to be allocated
pursuant to Article VI and is to be reflected in the
Partners Capital Accounts, the determination, recognition
and classification of any such item shall be the same as its
determination, recognition and classification for United States
federal income tax purposes (including, without limitation, any
method of depreciation, cost recovery or amortization used for
that purpose), provided, that:
|
|
|
(i) Solely for purposes of this Section 5.5, the
Partnership shall be treated as owning directly its
proportionate share (as determined by the General Partner based
upon the provisions of the applicable Group Member Agreement) of
all property owned any other Group Member that is classified as
a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes. |
|
|
(ii) All fees and other expenses incurred by the
Partnership to promote the sale of (or to sell) a
Partnership Interest that can neither be deducted nor
amortized under Section 709 of the Code, if any, shall, for
purposes of Capital Account maintenance, be treated as an item
of deduction at the time such fees and other expenses are
incurred and shall be allocated among the Partners pursuant to
Section 6.1. |
A-25
|
|
|
(iii) Except as otherwise provided in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(m), the
computation of all items of income, gain, loss and deduction
shall be made without regard to any election under
Section 754 of the Code which may be made by the
Partnership and, as to those items described in
Section 705(a)(1)(B) or 705(a)(2)(B) of the Code, without
regard to the fact that such items are not includable in gross
income or are neither currently deductible nor capitalized for
United States federal income tax purposes. To the extent an
adjustment to the adjusted tax basis of any Partnership asset
pursuant to Section 734(b) or 743(b) of the Code is
required, pursuant to Treasury Regulation
Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(m), to be taken into account in
determining Capital Accounts, the amount of such adjustment in
the Capital Accounts shall be treated as an item of gain or loss. |
|
|
(iv) Any income, gain or loss attributable to the taxable
disposition of any Partnership property shall be determined as
if the adjusted basis of such property as of such date of
disposition were equal in amount to the Partnerships
Carrying Value with respect to such property as of such date. |
|
|
(v) In accordance with the requirements of
Section 704(b) of the Code, any deductions for
depreciation, cost recovery or amortization attributable to any
Contributed Property shall be determined as if the adjusted
basis of such property on the date it was acquired by the
Partnership were equal to the Agreed Value of such property.
Upon an adjustment pursuant to Section 5.5(d) to the
Carrying Value of any Partnership property subject to
depreciation, cost recovery or amortization, any further
deductions for such depreciation, cost recovery or amortization
attributable to such property shall be determined (A) as if
the adjusted basis of such property were equal to the Carrying
Value of such property immediately following such adjustment and
(B) using a rate of depreciation, cost recovery or
amortization derived from the same method and useful life (or,
if applicable, the remaining useful life) as is applied for
United States federal income tax purposes; provided,
however, that, if the asset has a zero adjusted basis for
United States federal income tax purposes, depreciation, cost
recovery or amortization deductions shall be determined using
any method that the General Partner may adopt. |
(c) (i) A transferee of a Partnership Interest
shall succeed to a pro rata portion of the Capital Account of
the transferor relating to the Partnership Interest so
transferred.
|
|
|
(ii) Immediately prior to the transfer of a Subordinated
Unit or of a Subordinated Unit that has converted into a Common
Unit pursuant to Section 5.8 by a holder thereof (other
than a transfer to an Affiliate unless the General Partner
elects to have this subparagraph 5.5(c)(ii) apply), the
Capital Account maintained for such Person with respect to its
Subordinated Units or converted Subordinated Units will
(A) first, be allocated to the Subordinated Units or
converted Subordinated Units to be transferred in an amount
equal to the product of (x) the number of such Subordinated
Units or converted Subordinated Units to be transferred and
(y) the Per Unit Capital Amount for a Common Unit, and
(B) second, any remaining balance in such Capital Account
will be retained by the transferor, regardless of whether it has
retained any Subordinated Units or converted Subordinated Units.
Following any such allocation, the transferors Capital
Account, if any, maintained with respect to the retained
Subordinated Units or converted Subordinated Units, if any, will
have a balance equal to the amount allocated under
clause (B) hereinabove, and the transferees Capital
Account established with respect to the transferred Subordinated
Units or converted Subordinated Units will have a balance equal
to the amount allocated under clause (A) hereinabove. |
(d) (i) In accordance with Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(f), on an
issuance of additional Partnership Interests for cash or
Contributed Property or the conversion of the General
Partners Combined Interest to Common Units pursuant to
Section 11.3(b), the Capital Account of all Partners and
the Carrying Value of each Partnership property immediately
prior to such issuance shall be adjusted upward or downward to
reflect any Unrealized Gain or Unrealized Loss attributable to
such Partnership property, as if such Unrealized Gain or
Unrealized Loss had been recognized on an actual sale of each
such property immediately prior to such issuance and had been
allocated to the Partners at such time pursuant to
Section 6.1 in the same manner as any item of gain or loss
actually recognized during such
A-26
period would have been allocated. In determining such Unrealized
Gain or Unrealized Loss, the aggregate cash amount and fair
market value of all Partnership assets (including, without
limitation, cash or cash equivalents) immediately prior to the
issuance of additional Partnership Interests shall be
determined by the General Partner using such method of valuation
as it may adopt; provided, however, that the General
Partner, in arriving at such valuation, must take fully into
account the fair market value of the Partnership Interests
of all Partners at such time. The General Partner shall allocate
such aggregate value among the assets of the Partnership (in
such manner as it determines) to arrive at a fair market value
for individual properties.
|
|
|
(ii) In accordance with Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(f), immediately
prior to any actual or deemed distribution to a Partner of any
Partnership property (other than a distribution of cash that is
not in redemption or retirement of a Partnership Interest),
the Capital Accounts of all Partners and the Carrying Value of
all Partnership property shall be adjusted upward or downward to
reflect any Unrealized Gain or Unrealized Loss attributable to
such Partnership property, as if such Unrealized Gain or
Unrealized Loss had been recognized in a sale of such property
immediately prior to such distribution for an amount equal to
its fair market value, and had been allocated to the Partners,
at such time, pursuant to Section 6.1 in the same manner as
any item of gain or loss actually recognized during such period
would have been allocated. In determining such Unrealized Gain
or Unrealized Loss the aggregate cash amount and fair market
value of all Partnership assets (including, without limitation,
cash or cash equivalents) immediately prior to a distribution
shall (A) in the case of an actual distribution that is not
made pursuant to Section 12.4 or in the case of a deemed
distribution, be determined and allocated in the same manner as
that provided in Section 5.5(d)(i) or (B) in the case
of a liquidating distribution pursuant to Section 12.4, be
determined and allocated by the Liquidator using such method of
valuation as it may adopt. |
Section 5.6 Issuances
of Additional Partnership Securities.
(a) The Partnership may issue additional Partnership
Securities and options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights
relating to the Partnership Securities for any Partnership
purpose at any time and from time to time to such Persons for
such consideration and on such terms and conditions as the
General Partner shall determine, all without the approval of any
Limited Partners.
(b) Each additional Partnership Security authorized to be
issued by the Partnership pursuant to Section 5.6(a) may be
issued in one or more classes, or one or more series of any such
classes, with such designations, preferences, rights, powers and
duties (which may be senior to existing classes and series of
Partnership Securities), as shall be fixed by the General
Partner, including (i) the right to share Partnership
profits and losses or items thereof; (ii) the right to
share in Partnership distributions; (iii) the rights upon
dissolution and liquidation of the Partnership;
(iv) whether, and the terms and conditions upon which, the
Partnership may redeem the Partnership Security; (v) whether
such Partnership Security is issued with the privilege of
conversion or exchange and, if so, the terms and conditions of
such conversion or exchange; (vi) the terms and conditions
upon which each Partnership Security will be issued, evidenced
by certificates and assigned or transferred; (vii) the
method for determining the Percentage Interest as to such
Partnership Security; and (viii) the right, if any, of each
such Partnership Security to vote on Partnership matters,
including matters relating to the relative rights, preferences
and privileges of such Partnership Security.
(c) The General Partner shall take all actions that it
determines to be necessary or appropriate in connection with
(i) each issuance of Partnership Securities and options,
rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to Partnership
Securities pursuant to this Section 5.6, (ii) the
conversion of the General Partner Interest or any Incentive
Distribution Rights into Units pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement, (iii) the admission of Additional Limited
Partners and (iv) all additional issuances of Partnership
Securities. The General Partner shall determine the relative
rights, powers and duties of the holders of the Units or other
Partnership Securities being so issued. The General Partner
shall do all things necessary to comply with the Marshall
Islands Act and is authorized and directed to do all things that
it determines to be necessary or appropriate in connection with
any future issuance of Partnership Securities or in
A-27
connection with the conversion of the General Partner Interest
or any Incentive Distribution Rights into Units pursuant to the
terms of this Agreement, including compliance with any statute,
rule, regulation or guideline of any federal, state or other
governmental agency or any National Securities Exchange on which
the Units or other Partnership Securities are listed.
Section 5.7 Limitations
on Issuance of Additional Partnership Securities.
The Partnership may issue an unlimited number of Partnership
Securities (or options, rights, warrants or appreciation rights
related thereto) pursuant to Section 5.6 without the
approval of the Limited Partners; provided, however, that no
fractional units shall be issued by the Partnership.
Section 5.8 Conversion
of Subordinated Units.
(a) A total of 3,683,643 of the Outstanding Subordinated
Units will convert into Common Units on a one-for-one basis on
the second Business Day following the distribution of Available
Cash to Partners pursuant to Section 6.3(a) in respect of
any Quarter ending on or after March 31, 2008, in respect
of which:
|
|
|
(i) distributions under Section 6.4 in respect of all
Outstanding Common Units and Subordinated Units and any other
Outstanding Units that are senior or equal in right of
distribution to the Subordinated Units with respect to each of
the three consecutive, non-overlapping four-Quarter periods
immediately preceding such date equaled or exceeded the sum of
the Minimum Quarterly Distribution on all of the Outstanding
Common Units and Subordinated Units and any other Outstanding
Units that are senior or equal in right of distribution to the
Subordinated Units during such periods; |
|
|
(ii) the Adjusted Operating Surplus generated during each
of the three consecutive, non-overlapping four-Quarter periods
immediately preceding such date equaled or exceeded the sum of
the Minimum Quarterly Distribution on all of the Common Units,
Subordinated Units and any other Units that are senior or equal
in right of distribution to the Subordinated Units that were
Outstanding during such periods on a Fully Diluted Basis, plus
the related distribution on the General Partner Interest in the
Partnership, during such periods; and |
|
|
(iii) the Cumulative Common Unit Arrearage on all of the
Common Units is zero |
(b) An additional 3,683,643 of the Outstanding Subordinated
Units will convert into Common Units on a one-for-one basis on
the second Business Day following the distribution of Available
Cash to Partners pursuant to Section 6.3(a) in respect of
any Quarter ending on or after March 31, 2009, in respect
of which:
|
|
|
(i) distributions under Section 6.4 in respect of all
Outstanding Common Units and Subordinated Units and any other
Outstanding Units that are senior or equal in right of
distribution to the Subordinated Units with respect to each of
the three consecutive, non-overlapping four-Quarter periods
immediately preceding such date equaled or exceeded the sum of
the Minimum Quarterly Distribution on all of the Outstanding
Common Units and Subordinated Units and any other Outstanding
Units that are senior or equal in right of distribution to the
Subordinated Units during such periods; |
|
|
(ii) the Adjusted Operating Surplus generated during each
of the three consecutive, non-overlapping four-Quarter periods
immediately preceding such date equaled or exceeded the sum of
the Minimum Quarterly Distribution on all of the Common Units,
Subordinated Units and any other Units that are senior or equal
in right of distribution to the Subordinated Units that were
Outstanding during such periods on a Fully Diluted Basis, plus
the related distribution on the General Partner Interest during
such periods; and |
|
|
(iii) the Cumulative Common Unit Arrearage on all of the
Common Units is zero; |
provided, however, that the conversion of Subordinated Units
pursuant to this Section 5.8(b) may not occur until at
least one year following the conversion of Subordinated Units
pursuant to Section 5.8(a).
A-28
(c) In the event that less than all of the Outstanding
Subordinated Units shall convert into Common Units pursuant to
Sections 5.8(a) or 5.8(b) at a time when there shall be
more than one holder of Subordinated Units, then, unless all of
the holders of Subordinated Units shall agree to a different
allocation, the Subordinated Units that are to be converted into
Common Units shall be allocated among the holders of
Subordinated Units pro rata based on the number of Subordinated
Units held by each such holder.
(d) Any Subordinated Units that are not converted into
Common Units pursuant to Sections 5.8(a) or 5.8(b) shall
convert into Common Units on a one-for-one basis on the second
Business Day following the distribution of Available Cash to
Partners pursuant to Section 6.3(a) in respect of the final
Quarter of the Subordination Period.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
all the then Outstanding Subordinated Units will automatically
convert into Common Units on a one-for-one basis as set forth
in, and pursuant to the terms of, Section 11.4.
(f) A Subordinated Unit that has converted into a Common
Unit shall be subject to the provisions of Section 6.7(b).
Section 5.9 Limited
Preemptive Right.
Except as provided in this Section 5.9 and in
Section 5.2(b), no Person shall have any preemptive,
preferential or other similar right with respect to the issuance
of any Partnership Security, whether unissued, held in the
treasury or hereafter created. The General Partner shall have
the right, which it may from time to time assign in whole or in
part to any of its Affiliates, to purchase Partnership
Securities from the Partnership whenever, and on the same terms
that, the Partnership issues Partnership Securities to Persons
other than the General Partner and its Affiliates, to the extent
necessary to maintain the Percentage Interests of the General
Partner and its Affiliates equal to that which existed
immediately prior to the issuance of such Partnership Securities.
Section 5.10 Splits
and Combinations.
(a) Subject to Sections 5.10(d), 6.6 and 6.9 (dealing
with adjustments of distribution levels), the Partnership may
make a Pro Rata distribution of Partnership Securities to all
Record Holders or may effect a subdivision or combination of
Partnership Securities so long as, after any such event, each
Partner shall have the same Percentage Interest in the
Partnership as before such event, and any amounts calculated on
a per Unit basis (including any Common Unit Arrearage or
Cumulative Common Unit Arrearage) or stated as a number of Units
(including the number of Subordinated Units that may convert
prior to the end of the Subordination Period) are
proportionately adjusted.
(b) Whenever such a distribution, subdivision or
combination of Partnership Securities is declared, the General
Partner shall select a Record Date as of which the distribution,
subdivision or combination shall be effective and shall send
notice thereof at least 20 days prior to such Record Date
to each Record Holder as of a date not less than 10 days
prior to the date of such notice. The General Partner also may
cause a firm of independent public accountants selected by it to
calculate the number of Partnership Securities to be held by
each Record Holder after giving effect to such distribution,
subdivision or combination. The General Partner shall be
entitled to rely on any certificate provided by such firm as
conclusive evidence of the accuracy of such calculation.
(c) Promptly following any such distribution, subdivision
or combination, the Partnership may issue Certificates to the
Record Holders of Partnership Securities as of the applicable
Record Date representing the new number of Partnership
Securities held by such Record Holders, or the General Partner
may adopt such other procedures that it determines to be
necessary or appropriate to reflect such changes. If any such
combination results in a smaller total number of Partnership
Securities Outstanding, the Partnership shall require, as a
condition to the delivery to a Record Holder of such new
Certificate, the surrender of any Certificate held by such
Record Holder immediately prior to such Record Date.
A-29
(d) The Partnership shall not issue fractional Units upon
any distribution, subdivision or combination of Units. If a
distribution, subdivision or combination of Units would result
in the issuance of fractional Units but for the provisions of
this Section 5.10(d), each fractional Unit shall be rounded
to the nearest whole Unit (and a 0.5 Unit shall be rounded to
the next higher Unit).
Section 5.11 Fully
Paid and Non-Assessable Nature of Limited Partner Interests.
All Limited Partner Interests issued pursuant to, and in
accordance with the requirements of, this Article V shall
be fully paid and non-assessable Limited Partner Interests in
the Partnership, except as such non-assessability may be
affected by Section 51 of the Marshall Islands Act.
ARTICLE VI
Allocations and
Distributions
Section
6.1 Allocations for Capital
Account Purposes.
For purposes of maintaining the Capital Accounts and in
determining the rights of the Partners among themselves, the
Partnerships items of income, gain, loss and deduction
(computed in accordance with Section 5.5(b)) shall be
allocated among the Partners in each taxable year (or portion
thereof) as provided herein below.
|
|
|
(a) Net Income. After giving effect to the special
allocations set forth in Section 6.1(d), Net Income for
each taxable year and all items of income, gain, loss and
deduction taken into account in computing Net Income for such
taxable year shall be allocated as follows: |
|
|
|
(i) First, 100% to the General Partner, in an amount equal
to the aggregate Net Losses allocated to the General Partner
pursuant to Section 6.1(b)(iii) for all previous taxable
years until the aggregate Net Income allocated to the General
Partner pursuant to this Section 6.1(a)(i) for the current
taxable year and all previous taxable years is equal to the
aggregate Net Losses allocated to the General Partner pursuant
to Section 6.1(b)(iii) for all previous taxable years; |
|
|
(ii) Second, 2% to the General Partner and 98% to the
Unitholders, Pro Rata, until the aggregate Net Income
allocated pursuant to this Section 6.1(a)(ii) for the
current taxable year and all previous taxable years is equal to
the aggregate Net Losses allocated pursuant to
Section 6.1(b)(ii) for all previous taxable years; and |
|
|
(iii) Third, 2% to the General Partner, and 98% to the
Unitholders, Pro Rata. |
|
|
|
(b) Net Losses. After giving effect to the special
allocations set forth in Section 6.1(d), Net Losses for
each taxable period and all items of income, gain, loss and
deduction taken into account in computing Net Losses for such
taxable period shall be allocated as follows: |
|
|
|
(i) First, 2% to the General Partner, and 98% to the
Unitholders, Pro Rata, until the aggregate Net Losses allocated
pursuant to this Section 6.1(b)(i) for the current taxable
year and all previous taxable years is equal to the aggregate
Net Income allocated pursuant to Section 6.1(a)(iii) for
all previous taxable years, provided that the Net Losses shall
not be allocated pursuant to this Section 6.1(b)(i) to the
extent that such allocation would cause any Unitholder to have a
deficit balance in its Adjusted Capital Account at the end of
such taxable year (or increase any existing deficit balance in
its Adjusted Capital Account); |
|
|
(ii) Second, 2% to the General Partner, and 98% to the
Unitholders, Pro Rata; provided, that Net Losses shall
not be allocated pursuant to this Section 6.1(b)(ii) to the
extent that such allocation would cause any Unitholder to have a
deficit balance in its Adjusted Capital Account at the end of
such taxable year (or increase any existing deficit balance in
its Adjusted Capital Account); |
|
|
(iii) Third, the balance, if any, 100% to the General
Partner. |
A-30
|
|
|
(c) Net Termination Gains and Losses. After giving
effect to the special allocations set forth in
Section 6.1(d), all items of income, gain, loss and
deduction taken into account in computing Net Termination Gain
or Net Termination Loss for such taxable period shall be
allocated in the same manner as such Net Termination Gain or Net
Termination Loss is allocated hereunder. All allocations under
this Section 6.1(c) shall be made after Capital Account
balances have been adjusted by all other allocations provided
under this Section 6.1 and after all distributions of
Available Cash provided under Sections 6.4 and 6.5 have
been made; provided, however, that solely for purposes of
this Section 6.1(c), Capital Accounts shall not be adjusted
for distributions made pursuant to Section 12.4. |
|
|
|
(i) If a Net Termination Gain is recognized (or deemed
recognized pursuant to Section 5.5(d)), such Net
Termination Gain shall be allocated among the Partners in the
following manner (and the Capital Accounts of the Partners shall
be increased by the amount so allocated in each of the following
subclauses, in the order listed, before an allocation is made
pursuant to the next succeeding subclause): |
|
|
|
(A) First, to each Partner having a deficit balance in its
Capital Account, in the proportion that such deficit balance
bears to the total deficit balances in the Capital Accounts of
all Partners, until each such Partner has been allocated Net
Termination Gain equal to any such deficit balance in its
Capital Account; |
|
|
(B) Second, 98% to all Unitholders holding Common Units,
Pro Rata, and 2% to the General Partner, until the Capital
Account in respect of each Common Unit then Outstanding is equal
to the sum of (1) its Unrecovered Capital plus (2) the
Minimum Quarterly Distribution for the Quarter during which the
Liquidation Date occurs, reduced by any distribution pursuant to
Section 6.4(a)(i) or (b)(i) with respect to such Common
Unit for such Quarter (the amount determined pursuant to this
clause (2) is hereinafter defined as the Unpaid
MQD) plus (3) any then existing Cumulative Common
Unit Arrearage; |
|
|
(C) Third, if such Net Termination Gain is recognized (or
is deemed to be recognized) prior to the conversion of the last
Outstanding Subordinated Unit, 98% to all Unitholders holding
Subordinated Units, Pro Rata, and 2% to the General Partner,
until the Capital Account in respect of each Subordinated Unit
then Outstanding equals the sum of (1) its Unrecovered
Capital, determined for the taxable year (or portion thereof) to
which this allocation of gain relates, plus (2) the Minimum
Quarterly Distribution for the Quarter during which the
Liquidation Date occurs, reduced by any distribution pursuant to
Section 6.4(a)(iii) with respect to such Subordinated Unit
for such Quarter; |
|
|
(D) Fourth, 98% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, and 2% to the
General Partner, until the Capital Account in respect of each
Common Unit then Outstanding is equal to the sum of (1) its
Unrecovered Capital, plus (2) the Unpaid MQD, plus
(3) any then existing Cumulative Common Unit Arrearage,
plus (4) the excess of (aa) the First Target
Distribution less the Minimum Quarterly Distribution for each
Quarter of the Partnerships existence over (bb) the
cumulative per Unit amount of any distributions of Available
Cash that is deemed to be Operating Surplus made pursuant to
Sections 6.4(a)(iv) and 6.4(b)(ii) (the sum of
(1) plus (2) plus (3) plus (4) is
hereinafter defined as the First Liquidation Target
Amount); |
|
|
(E) Fifth, 85% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, 13% to the
holders of the Incentive Distribution Rights, Pro Rata, and 2%
to the General Partner, until the Capital Account in respect of
each Common Unit then Outstanding is equal to the sum of
(1) the First Liquidation Target Amount, plus (2) the
excess of (aa) the Second Target Distribution less the
First Target Distribution for each Quarter of the
Partnerships existence over (bb) the cumulative per
Unit amount of any distributions of Available Cash that is
deemed to be Operating Surplus made pursuant to
Sections 6.4(a)(v) and 6.4(b)(iii) (the sum of
(1) plus (2) is hereinafter defined as the
Second Liquidation Target Amount); |
A-31
|
|
|
(F) Sixth, 75% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, 23% to the
holders of the Incentive Distribution Rights, Pro Rata, and 2%
to the General Partner, until the Capital Account in respect of
each Common Unit then Outstanding is equal to the sum of
(1) the Second Liquidation Target Amount, plus (2) the
excess of (aa) the Third Target Distribution less the
Second Target Distribution for each Quarter of the
Partnerships existence over (bb) the cumulative per
Unit amount of any distributions of Available Cash that is
deemed to be Operating Surplus made pursuant to
Sections 6.4(a)(vi)and 6.4(b)(iv) (the sum of (1) plus
(2) is hereinafter defined as the Third Liquidation
Target Amount); and |
|
|
(G) Finally, any remaining amount 50% to all Unitholders,
Pro Rata, 48% to the holders of the Incentive Distribution
Rights, Pro Rata, and 2% to the General Partner. |
|
|
|
(ii) If a Net Termination Loss is recognized (or deemed
recognized pursuant to Section 5.5(d)), such Net
Termination Loss shall be allocated among the Partners in the
following manner: |
|
|
|
(A) First, if such Net Termination Loss is recognized (or
is deemed to be recognized) prior to the conversion of the last
Outstanding Subordinated Unit, 98% to the Unitholders holding
Subordinated Units, Pro Rata, and 2% to the General Partner,
until the Capital Account in respect of each Subordinated Unit
then Outstanding has been reduced to zero; |
|
|
(B) Second, 98% to all Unitholders holding Common Units,
Pro Rata, and 2% to the General Partner, until the Capital
Account in respect of each Common Unit then Outstanding has been
reduced to zero; and |
|
|
(C) Third, the balance, if any, 100% to the General Partner. |
|
|
|
(d) Special Allocations. Notwithstanding any other
provision of this Section 6.1, the following special
allocations shall be made for such taxable period: |
|
|
|
(i) Partnership Minimum Gain Chargeback.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 6.1, if
there is a net decrease in Partnership Minimum Gain during any
Partnership taxable period, each Partner shall be allocated
items of Partnership income and gain for such period (and, if
necessary, subsequent periods) in the manner and amounts
provided in Treasury
Regulation Sections 1.704-2(f)(6), 1.704-2(g)(2) and
1.704-2(j)(2)(i), or any successor provision. For purposes of
this Section 6.1(d), each Partners Adjusted Capital
Account balance shall be determined, and the allocation of
income or gain required hereunder shall be effected, prior to
the application of any other allocations pursuant to this
Section 6.1(d) with respect to such taxable period (other
than an allocation pursuant to Sections 6.1(d)(vi) and
6.1(d)(vii)). This Section 6.1(d)(i) is intended to comply
with the Partnership Minimum Gain chargeback requirement in
Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(f) and shall be
interpreted consistently therewith. |
|
|
(ii) Chargeback of Partner Nonrecourse Debt Minimum
Gain. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this
Section 6.1 (other than Section 6.1(d)(i)), except as
provided in Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(i)(4),
if there is a net decrease in Partner Nonrecourse Debt Minimum
Gain during any Partnership taxable period, any Partner with a
share of Partner Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain at the beginning
of such taxable period shall be allocated items of Partnership
income and gain for such period (and, if necessary, subsequent
periods) in the manner and amounts provided in Treasury
Regulation Sections 1.704-2(i)(4) and
1.704-2(j)(2)(ii), or any successor provisions. For purposes of
this Section 6.1(d), each Partners Adjusted Capital
Account balance shall be determined, and the allocation of
income or gain required hereunder shall be effected, prior to
the application of any other allocations pursuant to this
Section 6.1(d), other than Section 6.1(d)(i) and other
than an allocation pursuant to Sections 6.1(d)(vi) and
6.1(d)(vii), with respect to such taxable period. This
Section 6.1(d)(ii) is intended to comply with the
chargeback of items of income and gain |
A-32
|
|
|
requirement in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-2(i)(4) and shall be
interpreted consistently therewith. |
|
|
(iii) Priority Allocations. |
|
|
|
(A) If the amount of cash or the Net Agreed Value of any
property distributed (except cash or property distributed
pursuant to Section 12.4) to any Unitholder with respect to
its Units for a taxable year is greater (on a per Unit basis)
than the amount of cash or the Net Agreed Value of property
distributed to the other Unitholders with respect to their Units
(on a per Unit basis), then (1) each Unitholder receiving
such greater cash or property distribution shall be allocated
gross income in an amount equal to the product of (aa) the
amount by which the distribution (on a per Unit basis) to such
Unitholder exceeds the distribution (on a per Unit basis) to the
Unitholders receiving the smallest distribution and
(bb) the number of Units owned by the Unitholder receiving
the greater distribution; and (2) the General Partner shall
be allocated gross income in an aggregate amount equal to
2/98ths of the sum of the amounts allocated in clause (1)
above. |
|
|
(B) After the application of Section 6.1(d)(iii)(A),
all or any portion of the remaining items of Partnership gross
income or gain for the taxable period, if any, shall be
allocated (1) to the holders of Incentive Distribution
Rights, Pro Rata, until the aggregate amount of such items
allocated to the holders of Incentive Distribution Rights
pursuant to this paragraph 6.1(d)(iii)(B) for the current
taxable year and all previous taxable years is equal to the
cumulative amount of all Incentive Distributions made to the
holders of Incentive Distribution Rights from the Closing Date
to a date 45 days after the end of the current taxable year
and (2) to the General Partner in an amount equal to
2/98ths of the sum of the amounts allocated in clause (1)
above. |
|
|
|
(iv) Qualified Income Offset. In the event any
Partner unexpectedly receives any adjustments, allocations or
distributions described in Treasury Regulation
Sections 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d)(4), 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d)(5),
or 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d)(6), items of Partnership income and gain
shall be specially allocated to such Partner in an amount and
manner sufficient to eliminate, to the extent required by the
Treasury Regulations promulgated under Section 704(b) of
the Code, the deficit balance, if any, in its Adjusted Capital
Account created by such adjustments, allocations or
distributions as quickly as possible unless such deficit balance
is otherwise eliminated pursuant to Section 6.1(d)(i) or
(ii). |
|
|
(v) Gross Income Allocations. In the event any
Partner has a deficit balance in its Capital Account at the end
of any Partnership taxable period in excess of the sum of
(A) the amount such Partner is required to restore pursuant
to the provisions of this Agreement and (B) the amount such
Partner is deemed obligated to restore pursuant to Treasury
Regulation Sections 1.704-2(g) and 1.704-2(i)(5), such
Partner shall be specially allocated items of Partnership gross
income and gain in the amount of such excess as quickly as
possible; provided, that an allocation pursuant to this
Section 6.1(d)(v) shall be made only if and to the extent
that such Partner would have a deficit balance in its Capital
Account as adjusted after all other allocations provided for in
this Section 6.1 have been tentatively made as if this
Section 6.1(d)(v) were not in this Agreement. |
|
|
(vi) Nonrecourse Deductions. Nonrecourse Deductions
for any taxable period shall be allocated to the Partners in
accordance with their respective Percentage Interests. If the
General Partner determines that the Partnerships
Nonrecourse Deductions should be allocated in a different ratio
to satisfy the safe harbor requirements of the Treasury
Regulations promulgated under Section 704(b) of the Code,
the General Partner is authorized, upon notice to the other
Partners, to revise the prescribed ratio to the numerically
closest ratio that does satisfy such requirements. |
A-33
|
|
|
(vii) Partner Nonrecourse Deductions. Partner
Nonrecourse Deductions for any taxable period shall be allocated
100% to the Partner that bears the Economic Risk of Loss with
respect to the Partner Nonrecourse Debt to which such Partner
Nonrecourse Deductions are attributable in accordance with
Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(i). If more than one
Partner bears the Economic Risk of Loss with respect to a
Partner Nonrecourse Debt, such Partner Nonrecourse Deductions
attributable thereto shall be allocated between or among such
Partners in accordance with the ratios in which they share such
Economic Risk of Loss. |
|
|
(viii) Nonrecourse Liabilities. For purposes of
Treasury Regulation Section 1.752-3(a)(3), the Partners
agree that Nonrecourse Liabilities of the Partnership in excess
of the sum of (A) the amount of Partnership Minimum Gain
and (B) the total amount of Nonrecourse Built-in Gain shall
be allocated among the Partners in accordance with their
respective Percentage Interests. |
|
|
(ix) Code Section 754 Adjustments. To the
extent an adjustment to the adjusted tax basis of any
Partnership asset pursuant to Section 734(b) or 743(b) of
the Code is required, pursuant to Treasury Regulation
Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(m), to be taken into account in
determining Capital Accounts, the amount of such adjustment to
the Capital Accounts shall be treated as an item of gain (if the
adjustment increases the basis of the asset) or loss (if the
adjustment decreases such basis), and such item of gain or loss
shall be specially allocated to the Partners in a manner
consistent with the manner in which their Capital Accounts are
required to be adjusted pursuant to such Section of the Treasury
Regulations. |
|
|
(x) Economic Uniformity. At the election of the
General Partner with respect to any taxable period ending upon,
or after, the termination of the Subordination Period with
respect to any class of Units, all or a portion of the remaining
items of Partnership gross income or gain for such taxable
period, after taking into account allocations pursuant to
Section 6.1(d)(iii), shall be allocated 100% to each
Partner holding Subordinated Units of that class that are
Outstanding as of the termination of such Subordination Period
(Final Subordinated Units) in the proportion of the
number of Final Subordinated Units held by such Partner to the
total number of Final Subordinated Units then Outstanding, until
each such Partner has been allocated an amount of gross income
or gain that increases the Capital Account maintained with
respect to such Final Subordinated Units to an amount equal to
the product of (A) the number of Final Subordinated Units
held by such Partner and (B) the Per Unit Capital Amount
for a Common Unit. The purpose of this allocation is to
establish uniformity between the Capital Accounts underlying
Final Subordinated Units and the Capital Accounts underlying
Common Units held by Persons other than the General Partner and
its Affiliates immediately prior to the conversion of such Final
Subordinated Units into Common Units. This allocation method for
establishing such economic uniformity will be available to the
General Partner only if the method for allocating the Capital
Account maintained with respect to the Subordinated Units
between the transferred and retained Subordinated Units pursuant
to Section 5.5(c)(ii) does not otherwise provide such
economic uniformity to the Final Subordinated Units. |
|
|
(xi) Curative Allocation. |
|
|
|
(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Section 6.1, other than the Required Allocations, the
Required Allocations shall be taken into account in making the
Agreed Allocations so that, to the extent possible, the net
amount of items of income, gain, loss and deduction allocated to
each Partner pursuant to the Required Allocations and the Agreed
Allocations, together, shall be equal to the net amount of such
items that would have been allocated to each such Partner under
the Agreed Allocations had the Required Allocations and the
related Curative Allocation not otherwise been provided in this
Section 6.1. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence,
Required Allocations relating to (1) Nonrecourse Deductions
shall not be taken into account except to the extent that there
has been a decrease in Partnership Minimum Gain and
(2) Partner Nonrecourse Deductions shall not |
A-34
|
|
|
be taken into account except to the extent that there has been a
decrease in Partner Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain. Allocations
pursuant to this Section 6.1(d)(xi)(A) shall only be made
with respect to Required Allocations to the extent the General
Partner determines that such allocations will otherwise be
inconsistent with the economic agreement among the Partners.
Further, allocations pursuant to this Section 6.1(d)(xi)(A)
shall be deferred with respect to allocations pursuant to
clauses (1) and (2) hereof to the extent the General
Partner determines that such allocations are likely to be offset
by subsequent Required Allocations. |
|
|
(B) The General Partner shall, with respect to each taxable
period, (1) apply the provisions of
Section 6.1(d)(xi)(A) in whatever order is most likely to
minimize the economic distortions that might otherwise result
from the Required Allocations, and (2) divide all
allocations pursuant to Section 6.1(d)(xi)(A) among the
Partners in a manner that is likely to minimize such economic
distortions. |
|
|
|
(xii) Corrective Allocations. In the event of any
allocation of Additional Book Basis Derivative Items or any
Book-Down Event or any recognition of a Net Termination Loss,
the following rules shall apply: |
|
|
|
(A) In the case of any allocation of Additional Book Basis
Derivative Items (other than an allocation of Unrealized Gain or
Unrealized Loss under Section 5.5(d) hereof), the General
Partner shall allocate additional items of gross income and gain
away from the holders of Incentive Distribution Rights to the
Unitholders and the General Partner, or additional items of
deduction and loss away from the Unitholders and the General
Partner to the holders of Incentive Distribution Rights, to the
extent that the Additional Book Basis Derivative Items allocated
to the Unitholders or the General Partner exceed their Share of
Additional Book Basis Derivative Items. For this purpose, the
Unitholders and the General Partner shall be treated as being
allocated Additional Book Basis Derivative Items to the extent
that such Additional Book Basis Derivative Items have reduced
the amount of income that would otherwise have been allocated to
the Unitholders or the General Partner under the Partnership
Agreement (e.g., Additional Book Basis Derivative Items taken
into account in computing cost of goods sold would reduce the
amount of book income otherwise available for allocation among
the Partners). Any allocation made pursuant to this
Section 6.1(d)(xii)(A) shall be made after all of the other
Agreed Allocations have been made as if this
Section 6.1(d)(xii) were not in this Agreement and, to the
extent necessary, shall require the reallocation of items that
have been allocated pursuant to such other Agreed Allocations. |
|
|
(B) In the case of any negative adjustments to the Capital
Accounts of the Partners resulting from a Book-Down Event or
from the recognition of a Net Termination Loss, such negative
adjustment (1) shall first be allocated, to the extent of
the Aggregate Remaining Net Positive Adjustments, in such a
manner, as determined by the General Partner, that to the extent
possible the aggregate Capital Accounts of the Partners will
equal the amount that would have been the Capital Account
balance of the Partners if no prior Book-Up Events had occurred,
and (2) any negative adjustment in excess of the Aggregate
Remaining Net Positive Adjustments shall be allocated pursuant
to Section 6.1(c) hereof. |
|
|
(C) In making the allocations required under this
Section 6.1(d)(xii), the General Partner may apply whatever
conventions or other methodology it determines will satisfy the
purpose of this Section 6.1(d)(xii). |
Section 6.2 Allocations
for Tax Purposes.
(a) Except as otherwise provided herein, for United States
federal income tax purposes, each item of income, gain, loss and
deduction shall be allocated among the Partners in the same
manner as its correlative item of book income, gain,
loss or deduction is allocated pursuant to Section 6.1.
A-35
(b) In an attempt to eliminate Book-Tax Disparities
attributable to a Contributed Property or Adjusted Property,
items of income, gain, loss, depreciation, amortization and cost
recovery deductions shall be allocated for United States federal
income tax purposes among the Partners as follows:
|
|
|
(i) (A) In the case of a Contributed Property, such
items attributable thereto shall be allocated among the Partners
in the manner provided under Section 704(c) of the Code
that takes into account the variation between the Agreed Value
of such property and its adjusted basis at the time of
contribution; and (B) any item of Residual Gain or Residual
Loss attributable to a Contributed Property shall be allocated
among the Partners in the same manner as its correlative item of
book gain or loss is allocated pursuant to
Section 6.1. |
|
|
(ii) (A) In the case of an Adjusted Property, such
items shall (1) first, be allocated among the Partners in a
manner consistent with the principles of Section 704(c) of
the Code to take into account the Unrealized Gain or Unrealized
Loss attributable to such property and the allocations thereof
pursuant to Section 5.5(d)(i) or 5.5(d)(ii), and
(2) second, in the event such property was originally a
Contributed Property, be allocated among the Partners in a
manner consistent with Section 6.2(b)(i)(A); and
(B) any item of Residual Gain or Residual Loss attributable
to an Adjusted Property shall be allocated among the Partners in
the same manner as its correlative item of book gain
or loss is allocated pursuant to Section 6.1. |
|
|
(iii) The General Partner shall apply the principles of
Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-3(d) to eliminate
Book-Tax Disparities. |
(c) For the proper administration of the Partnership and
for the preservation of uniformity of the Limited Partner
Interests (or any class or classes thereof), the General Partner
shall (i) adopt such conventions as it deems appropriate in
determining the amount of depreciation, amortization and cost
recovery deductions; (ii) make special allocations for
United States federal income tax purposes of income (including,
without limitation, gross income) or deductions; and
(iii) amend the provisions of this Agreement as appropriate
(x) to reflect the proposal or promulgation of Treasury
Regulations under Section 704(b) or Section 704(c) of
the Code or (y) otherwise to preserve or achieve uniformity
of the Limited Partner Interests (or any class or classes
thereof). The General Partner may adopt such conventions, make
such allocations and make such amendments to this Agreement as
provided in this Section 6.2(c) only if such conventions,
allocations or amendments would not have a material adverse
effect on the Partners, the holders of any class or classes of
Limited Partner Interests issued and Outstanding or the
Partnership, and if such allocations are consistent with the
principles of Section 704 of the Code.
(d) The General Partner may determine to depreciate or
amortize the portion of an adjustment under Section 743(b)
of the Code attributable to unrealized appreciation in any
Adjusted Property (to the extent of the unamortized Book-Tax
Disparity) using a predetermined rate derived from the
depreciation or amortization method and useful life applied to
the Partnerships common basis of such property, despite
any inconsistency of such approach with Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-l(a)(6) or any successor
regulations thereto. If the General Partner determines that such
reporting position cannot reasonably be taken, the General
Partner may adopt depreciation and amortization conventions
under which all purchasers acquiring Limited Partner Interests
in the same month would receive depreciation and amortization
deductions, based upon the same applicable rate as if they had
purchased a direct interest in the Partnerships property.
If the General Partner chooses not to utilize such aggregate
method, the General Partner may use any other depreciation and
amortization conventions to preserve the uniformity of the
intrinsic tax characteristics of any Limited Partner Interests,
so long as such conventions would not have a material adverse
effect on the Limited Partners or the Record Holders of any
class or classes of Limited Partner Interests.
(e) Any gain allocated to the Partners upon the sale or
other taxable disposition of any Partnership asset shall, to the
extent possible, after taking into account other required
allocations of gain pursuant to this Section 6.2, be
characterized as Recapture Income in the same proportions and to
the same extent as
A-36
such Partners (or their predecessors in interest) have been
allocated any deductions directly or indirectly giving rise to
the treatment of such gains as Recapture Income.
(f) All items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit
recognized by the Partnership for United States federal income
tax purposes and allocated to the Partners in accordance with
the provisions hereof shall be determined without regard to any
election under Section 754 of the Code that may be made by
the Partnership; provided, however, that such
allocations, once made, shall be adjusted (in the manner
determined by the General Partner) to take into account those
adjustments permitted or required by Sections 734 and 743
of the Code.
(g) Each item of Partnership income, gain, loss and
deduction shall for United States federal income tax purposes,
be determined on an annual basis and prorated on a monthly basis
and shall be allocated to the Partners as of the opening of the
New York Stock Exchange on the first Business Day of each month;
provided, however, such items for the period beginning on
the Closing Date and ending on the last day of the month in
which the Option Closing Date or the expiration of the
Over-Allotment Option occurs shall be allocated to the Partners
as of the opening of the New York Stock Exchange on the first
Business Day of the next succeeding month; and provided,
further, that gain or loss on a sale or other disposition of any
assets of the Partnership or any other extraordinary item of
income or loss realized and recognized other than in the
ordinary course of business, as determined by the General
Partner, shall be allocated to the Partners as of the opening of
the New York Stock Exchange on the first Business Day of the
month in which such gain or loss is recognized for United States
federal income tax purposes. The General Partner may revise,
alter or otherwise modify such methods of allocation to the
extent permitted or required by Section 706 of the Code and
the regulations or rulings promulgated thereunder.
(h) Allocations that would otherwise be made to a Limited
Partner under the provisions of this Article VI shall
instead be made to the beneficial owner of Limited Partner
Interests held by a nominee in any case in which the nominee has
furnished the identity of such owner to the Partnership in
accordance with Section 6031(c) of the Code or any other
method determined by the General Partner.
Section 6.3 Requirement
and Characterization of Distributions; Distributions to Record
Holders.
(a) Within 45 days following the end of each Quarter
commencing with the Quarter ending on June 30, 2005, an
amount equal to 100% of Available Cash with respect to such
Quarter shall, subject to Section 51 of the Marshall
Islands Act, be distributed in accordance with this
Article VI by the Partnership to the Partners as of the
Record Date selected by the General Partner. All amounts of
Available Cash distributed by the Partnership on any date from
any source shall be deemed to be Operating Surplus until the sum
of all amounts of Available Cash theretofore distributed by the
Partnership to the Partners pursuant to Section 6.4 equals
the Operating Surplus from the Closing Date through the close of
the immediately preceding Quarter. Any remaining amounts of
Available Cash distributed by the Partnership on such date
shall, except as otherwise provided in Section 6.5, be
deemed to be Capital Surplus. All distributions
required to be made under this Agreement shall be made subject
to Section 51 of the Marshall Islands Act.
(b) Notwithstanding Section 6.3(a), in the event of
the dissolution and liquidation of the Partnership, all receipts
received during or after the Quarter in which the Liquidation
Date occurs, other than from borrowings described in (a)(ii) of
the definition of Available Cash, shall be applied and
distributed solely in accordance with, and subject to the terms
and conditions of, Section 12.4.
(c) The General Partner may treat taxes paid by the
Partnership on behalf of, or amounts withheld with respect to,
all or less than all of the Partners, as a distribution of
Available Cash to such Partners.
(d) Each distribution in respect of a
Partnership Interest shall be paid by the Partnership,
directly or through the Transfer Agent or through any other
Person or agent, only to the Record Holder of such
Partnership Interest as of the Record Date set for such
distribution. Such payment shall constitute full payment and
satisfaction of the Partnerships liability in respect of
such payment, regardless of any claim of any Person who may have
an interest in such payment by reason of an assignment or
otherwise.
A-37
Section 6.4 Distributions
of Available Cash from Operating Surplus.
(a) During Subordination Period. Available Cash with
respect to any Quarter within the Subordination Period that is
deemed to be Operating Surplus pursuant to the provisions of
Sections 6.3 or 6.5 shall, subject to Section 51 of
the Marshall Islands Act, be distributed as follows, except as
otherwise required by Section 5.6(b) in respect of other
Partnership Securities issued pursuant thereto:
|
|
|
(i) First, 98% to the Unitholders holding Common Units, Pro
Rata, and 2% to the General Partner, until there has been
distributed in respect of each Common Unit then Outstanding an
amount equal to the Minimum Quarterly Distribution for such
Quarter; |
|
|
(ii) Second, 98% to the Unitholders holding Common Units,
Pro Rata, and 2% to the General Partner, until there has been
distributed in respect of each Common Unit then Outstanding an
amount equal to the Cumulative Common Unit Arrearage existing
with respect to such Quarter; |
|
|
(iii) Third, 98% to the Unitholders holding Subordinated
Units, Pro Rata, and 2% to the General Partner, until there has
been distributed in respect of each Subordinated Unit then
Outstanding an amount equal to the Minimum Quarterly
Distribution for such Quarter; |
|
|
(iv) Fourth, 98% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, and 2% to
the General Partner, until there has been distributed in respect
of each Unit then Outstanding an amount equal to the excess of
the First Target Distribution over the Minimum Quarterly
Distribution for such Quarter; |
|
|
(v) Fifth, 85% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, 13% to the
holders of the Incentive Distribution Rights and 2% to the
General Partner, until there has been distributed in respect of
each Unit then Outstanding an amount equal to the excess of the
Second Target Distribution over the First Target Distribution
for such Quarter; |
|
|
(vi) Sixth, 75% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, 23% to the
holders of the Incentive Distribution Rights, Pro Rata, and 2%
to the General Partner, until there has been distributed in
respect of each Unit then Outstanding an amount equal to the
excess of the Third Target Distribution over the Second Target
Distribution for such Quarter; and |
|
|
(vii) Thereafter, 50% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, 48% to
the holders of the Incentive Distribution Rights, Pro Rata, and
2% to the General Partner; |
provided, however, if the Minimum Quarterly Distribution,
the First Target Distribution, the Second Target Distribution
and the Third Target Distribution have been reduced to zero
pursuant to the second sentence of Section 6.6(a), the
distribution of Available Cash that is deemed to be Operating
Surplus with respect to any Quarter will be made solely in
accordance with Section 6.4(a)(vii).
(b) After Subordination Period. Available Cash with respect
to any Quarter after the Subordination Period that is deemed to
be Operating Surplus pursuant to the provisions of
Sections 6.3 or 6.5, subject to Section 51 of the
Marshall Islands Act, shall be distributed as follows, except as
otherwise required by Section 5.6(b) in respect of
additional Partnership Securities issued pursuant thereto:
|
|
|
(i) First, 98% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, and 2% to the
General Partner, until there has been distributed in respect of
each Unit then Outstanding an amount equal to the Minimum
Quarterly Distribution for such Quarter; |
|
|
(ii) Second, 98% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, and 2% to
the General Partner, until there has been distributed in respect
of each Unit then Outstanding an amount equal to the excess of
the First Target Distribution over the Minimum Quarterly
Distribution for such Quarter; |
|
|
(iii) Third, 85% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, 13% to the
holders of the Incentive Distribution Rights, Pro Rata, and 2%
to the General Partner, until there has been distributed in
respect of each Unit then Outstanding an amount equal to the
excess of the Second Target Distribution over the First Target
Distribution for such Quarter; |
A-38
|
|
|
(iv) Fourth, 75% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, 23% to the
holders of the Incentive Distribution Rights, Pro Rata, and 2%
to the General Partner, until there has been distributed in
respect of each Unit then Outstanding an amount equal to the
excess of the Third Target Distribution over the Second Target
Distribution for such Quarter; and |
|
|
(v) Thereafter, 50% to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, 48% to
the holders of the Incentive Distribution Rights, Pro Rata, and
2% to the General Partner; |
provided, however, if the Minimum Quarterly Distribution,
the First Target Distribution, the Second Target Distribution
and the Third Target Distribution have been reduced to zero
pursuant to the second sentence of Section 6.6(a), the
distribution of Available Cash that is deemed to be Operating
Surplus with respect to any Quarter will be made solely in
accordance with Section 6.4(b)(v).
Section 6.5 Distributions
of Available Cash from Capital Surplus.
Available Cash that is deemed to be Capital Surplus pursuant to
the provisions of Section 6.3(a) shall, subject to
Section 51 of the Marshall Islands Act, be distributed,
unless the provisions of Section 6.3 require otherwise, 98%
to all Unitholders, Pro Rata, and 2% to the General Partner,
until a hypothetical holder of a Common Unit acquired on the
Closing Date has received with respect to such Common Unit,
during the period since the Closing Date through such date,
distributions of Available Cash that are deemed to be Capital
Surplus in an aggregate amount equal to the Initial Unit Price.
Available Cash that is deemed to be Capital Surplus shall then
be distributed 98% to all Unitholders holding Common Units, Pro
Rata, and 2% to the General Partner, until there has been
distributed in respect of each Common Unit then Outstanding an
amount equal to the Cumulative Common Unit Arrearage.
Thereafter, all Available Cash shall be distributed as if it
were Operating Surplus and shall be distributed in accordance
with Section 6.4.
Section 6.6 Adjustment
of Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target Distribution
Levels.
(a) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target
Distribution, Second Target Distribution, Third Target
Distribution, Common Unit Arrearages and Cumulative Common Unit
Arrearages shall be proportionately adjusted in the event of any
distribution, combination or subdivision (whether effected by a
distribution payable in Units or otherwise) of Units or other
Partnership Securities in accordance with Section 5.10. In
the event of a distribution of Available Cash that is deemed to
be from Capital Surplus, the then applicable Minimum Quarterly
Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target
Distribution and Third Target Distribution, shall be adjusted
proportionately downward to equal the product obtained by
multiplying the otherwise applicable Minimum Quarterly
Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target
Distribution and Third Target Distribution, as the case may be,
by a fraction of which the numerator is the Unrecovered Capital
of the Common Units immediately after giving effect to such
distribution and of which the denominator is the Unrecovered
Capital of the Common Units immediately prior to giving effect
to such distribution.
(b) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target
Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target
Distribution, shall also be subject to adjustment pursuant to
Section 6.9.
Section 6.7 Special
Provisions Relating to the Holders of Subordinated Units.
(a) Except with respect to the right to vote on or approve
matters requiring the vote or approval of a percentage of the
holders of Outstanding Common Units and the right to participate
in allocations of income, gain, loss and deduction and
distributions made with respect to Common Units, the holder of a
Subordinated Unit shall have all of the rights and obligations
of a Unitholder holding Common Units hereunder; provided,
however, that immediately upon the conversion of
Subordinated Units into Common Units pursuant to
Section 5.8, the Unitholder holding a Subordinated Unit
shall possess all of the rights and obligations of a Unitholder
holding Common Units hereunder, including the right to vote as a
Common Unitholder and the right to participate in allocations of
income, gain, loss and deduction and distributions made with
respect to Common Units; provided, however, that such
converted Subordinated Units shall remain subject to the
provisions of Sections 5.5(d)(ii), 6.1(d)(x) and 6.7(b).
A-39
(b) The Unitholder holding a Subordinated Unit that has
converted into a Common Unit pursuant to Section 5.8 shall
not be issued a Common Unit Certificate pursuant to
Section 4.1, and shall not be permitted to transfer its
converted Subordinated Units to a Person that is not an
Affiliate of the holder until such time as the General Partner
determines, based on advice of counsel, that a converted
Subordinated Unit should have, as a substantive matter, like
intrinsic economic and federal income tax characteristics, in
all material respects, to the intrinsic economic and federal
income tax characteristics of an Initial Common Unit. In
connection with the condition imposed by this
Section 6.7(b), the General Partner may take whatever steps
are required to provide economic uniformity to the converted
Subordinated Units in preparation for a transfer of such
converted Subordinated Units, including the application of
Sections 5.5(c)(ii) and 6.1(d)(x); provided,
however, that no such steps may be taken that would have a
material adverse effect on the Unitholders holding Common Units
represented by Common Unit Certificates.
Section 6.8 Special
Provisions Relating to the Holders of Incentive Distribution
Rights.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this
Agreement, the holders of the Incentive Distribution Rights
(a) shall (i) possess the rights and obligations
provided in this Agreement with respect to a Limited Partner
pursuant to Articles III and VII and (ii) have a
Capital Account as a Partner pursuant to Section 5.5 and
all other provisions related thereto and (b) shall not
(i) be entitled to vote on any matters requiring the
approval or vote of the holders of Outstanding Units,
(ii) be entitled to any distributions other than as
provided in Sections 6.4(a)(v), (vi) and (vii),
6.4(b)(iii), (iv) and (v), and 12.4 or (iii) be
allocated items of income, gain, loss or deduction other than as
specified in this Article VI.
Section 6.9 Entity-Level
Taxation.
If legislation is enacted or the interpretation of existing
language is modified by a governmental taxing authority so that
a Group Member is treated as an association taxable as a
corporation or is otherwise subject to an entity-level tax for
federal, state or local income tax purposes, then the General
Partner shall estimate for each Quarter the Partnership
Groups aggregate liability (the Estimated
Incremental Quarterly Tax Amount) for all such income
taxes that are payable by reason of any such new legislation or
interpretation; provided that any difference between such
estimate and the actual tax liability for such Quarter that is
owed by reason of any such new legislation or interpretation
shall be taken into account in determining the Estimated
Incremental Quarterly Tax Amount with respect to each Quarter in
which any such difference can be determined. For each such
Quarter, the Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target
Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target
Distribution, shall be the product obtained by multiplying
(a) the amounts therefor that are set out herein prior to
the application of this Section 6.9 times (b) the
quotient obtained by dividing (i) Available Cash with
respect to such Quarter by (ii) the sum of Available Cash
with respect to such Quarter and the Estimated Incremental
Quarterly Tax Amount for such Quarter, as determined by the
General Partner. For purposes of the foregoing, Available Cash
with respect to a Quarter will be deemed reduced by the
Estimated Incremental Quarterly Tax Amount for that Quarter.
ARTICLE VII
Management and Operation
of Business
Section 7.1 Management.
(a) The General Partner shall conduct, direct and manage
all activities of the Partnership. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in this Agreement, all management powers over the
business and affairs of the Partnership shall be exclusively
vested in the General Partner, and no Limited Partner or
Assignee shall have any management power over the business and
affairs of the Partnership. In addition to the powers now or
hereafter granted a general partner of a limited partnership
under applicable law or that are granted to the General Partner
under any other provision of this Agreement, the General
Partner, subject to Section 7.3, shall have full power and
authority to do all things and on such terms as it determines to
A-40
be necessary or appropriate to conduct the business of the
Partnership, to exercise all powers set forth in
Section 2.5 and to effectuate the purposes set forth in
Section 2.4, including the following:
|
|
|
(i) the making of any expenditures, the lending or
borrowing of money, the assumption or guarantee of, or other
contracting for, indebtedness and other liabilities, the
issuance of evidences of indebtedness, including indebtedness
that is convertible into Partnership Securities, and the
incurring of any other obligations; |
|
|
(ii) the making of tax, regulatory and other filings, or
rendering of periodic or other reports to governmental or other
agencies having jurisdiction over the business or assets of the
Partnership; |
|
|
(iii) the acquisition, disposition, mortgage, pledge,
encumbrance, hypothecation or exchange of any or all of the
assets of the Partnership or the merger or other combination of
the Partnership with or into another Person (the matters
described in this clause (iii) being subject, however, to
any prior approval that may be required by Section 7.3 and
Article XIV); |
|
|
(iv) the use of the assets of the Partnership (including
cash on hand) for any purpose consistent with the terms of this
Agreement, including the financing of the conduct of the
operations of the Partnership Group; subject to
Section 7.6(a), the lending of funds to other Persons
(including other Group Members); the repayment or guarantee of
obligations of the Partnership Group; and the making of capital
contributions to any member of the Partnership Group; |
|
|
(v) the negotiation, execution and performance of any
contracts, conveyances or other instruments (including
instruments that limit the liability of the Partnership under
contractual arrangements to all or particular assets of the
Partnership, with the other party to the contract to have no
recourse against the General Partner or its assets other than
its interest in the Partnership, even if same results in the
terms of the transaction being less favorable to the Partnership
than would otherwise be the case); |
|
|
(vi) the distribution of Partnership cash; |
|
|
(vii) the selection and dismissal of employees (including
employees having titles such as president,
vice president, secretary and
treasurer) and agents, outside attorneys,
accountants, consultants and contractors and the determination
of their compensation and other terms of employment or hiring; |
|
|
(viii) the maintenance of insurance for the benefit of the
Partnership Group, the Partners and Indemnitees; |
|
|
(ix) the formation of, or acquisition of an interest in,
and the contribution of property and the making of loans to, any
further limited or general partnerships, joint ventures,
corporations, limited liability companies or other relationships
(including the acquisition of interests in, and the
contributions of property to, any Group Member from time to
time) subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 2.4; |
|
|
(x) the control of any matters affecting the rights and
obligations of the Partnership, including the bringing and
defending of actions at law or in equity and otherwise engaging
in the conduct of litigation, arbitration or mediation and the
incurring of legal expense and the settlement of claims and
litigation; |
|
|
(xi) the indemnification of any Person against liabilities
and contingencies to the extent permitted by law; |
|
|
(xii) the entering into of listing agreements with any
National Securities Exchange and the delisting of some or all of
the Limited Partner Interests from, or requesting that trading
be suspended on, any such exchange (subject to any prior
approval that may be required under Section 4.8); |
|
|
(xiii) the purchase, sale or other acquisition or
disposition of Partnership Securities, or the issuance of
options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to
Partnership Securities; |
A-41
|
|
|
(xiv) the undertaking of any action in connection with the
Partnerships participation in any Group Member; and |
|
|
(xv) the entering into of agreements with any of its
Affiliates to render services to a Group Member or to itself in
the discharge of its duties as General Partner of the
Partnership. |
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
any Group Member Agreement, the Marshall Islands Act or any
applicable law, rule or regulation, each of the Partners and the
Assignees and each other Person who may acquire an interest in
Partnership Securities hereby (i) approves, ratifies and
confirms the execution, delivery and performance by the parties
thereto of this Agreement, the Underwriting Agreement, the
Omnibus Agreement, the Contribution Agreement, any Group Member
Agreement of any other Group Member and the other agreements
described in or filed as exhibits to the Registration Statement
that are related to the transactions contemplated by the
Registration Statement; (ii) agrees that the General
Partner (on its own or through any officer of the Partnership)
is authorized to execute, deliver and perform the agreements
referred to in clause (i) of this sentence and the other
agreements, acts, transactions and matters described in or
contemplated by the Registration Statement on behalf of the
Partnership without any further act, approval or vote of the
Partners or the Assignees or the other Persons who may acquire
an interest in Partnership Securities; and (iii) agrees
that the execution, delivery or performance by the General
Partner, any Group Member or any Affiliate of any of them of
this Agreement or any agreement authorized or permitted under
this Agreement (including the exercise by the General Partner or
any Affiliate of the General Partner of the rights accorded
pursuant to Article XV) shall not constitute a breach by
the General Partner of any duty that the General Partner may owe
the Partnership or the Limited Partners or any other Persons
under this Agreement (or any other agreements) or of any duty
stated or implied by law or equity.
Section 7.2 Certificate
of Limited Partnership.
The General Partner has caused the Certificate of Limited
Partnership to be filed with the Registrar of Corporations of
the Marshall Islands as required by the Marshall Islands Act.
The General Partner shall use all reasonable efforts to cause to
be filed such other certificates or documents that the General
Partner determines to be necessary or appropriate for the
formation, continuation, qualification and operation of a
limited partnership (or a partnership in which the limited
partners have limited liability) in the Marshall Islands or any
other jurisdiction in which the Partnership may elect to do
business or own property. To the extent the General Partner
determines such action to be necessary or appropriate, the
General Partner shall file amendments to and restatements of the
Certificate of Limited Partnership and do all things to maintain
the Partnership as a limited partnership (or a partnership or
other entity in which the limited partners have limited
liability) under the laws of the Marshall Islands or of any
other jurisdiction in which the Partnership may elect to do
business or own property. Subject to the terms of
Section 3.4(a), the General Partner shall not be required,
before or after filing, to deliver or mail a copy of the
Certificate of Limited Partnership, any qualification document
or any amendment thereto to any Limited Partner.
Section 7.3 Restrictions
on the General Partners Authority.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the
General Partner may not, without written approval of the
specific act by holders of all of the Outstanding Limited
Partner Interests or by other written instrument executed and
delivered by holders of all of the Outstanding Limited Partner
Interests subsequent to the date of this Agreement, take any
action in contravention of this Agreement, including,
(i) committing any act that would make it impossible to
carry on the ordinary business of the Partnership;
(ii) possessing Partnership property, or assigning any
rights in specific Partnership property, for other than a
Partnership purpose; (iii) admitting a Person as a Partner;
(iv) amending this Agreement in any manner; or
(v) transferring its interest as a general partner of the
Partnership.
(b) Except as provided in Articles XII and XIV, the
General Partner may not sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of
all or substantially all of the assets of the Partnership Group,
taken as a whole, in a single transaction or a series of related
transactions (including by way of merger, consolidation, other
A-42
combination or sale of ownership interests in the
Partnerships Subsidiaries) without the approval of holders
of a Unit Majority; provided, however, that this
provision shall not preclude or limit the General Partners
ability to mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or grant a security
interest in all or substantially all of the assets of the
Partnership Group and shall not apply to any forced sale of any
or all of the assets of the Partnership Group pursuant to the
foreclosure of, or other realization upon, any such encumbrance.
Without the approval of holders of a Unit Majority, the General
Partner shall not, on behalf of the Partnership,
(i) consent to any amendment to the Operating Company
Agreement or, except as expressly permitted by
Section 7.9(e), take any action permitted to be taken by a
member of the Operating Company, in either case, that would
adversely affect the Limited Partners (including any particular
class of Partnership Interests as compared to any other
class of Partnership Interests) in any material respect or
(ii) except as permitted under Sections 4.6, 11.1 and
11.2, elect or cause the Partnership to elect a successor
general partner of the Partnership.
Section 7.4 Reimbursement
of the General Partner.
(a) Except as provided in this Section 7.4 and
elsewhere in this Agreement, the General Partner shall not be
compensated for its services as a general partner or managing
member of any Group Member.
(b) The General Partner shall be reimbursed on a monthly
basis, or such other basis as the General Partner may determine,
for (i) all direct and indirect expenses it incurs or
payments it makes on behalf of the Partnership (including
salary, bonus, incentive compensation and other amounts paid to
any Person including Affiliates of the General Partner to
perform services for the Partnership or for the General Partner
in the discharge of its duties to the Partnership), and
(ii) all other expenses allocable to the Partnership or
otherwise incurred by the General Partner in connection with
operating the Partnerships business (including expenses
allocated to the General Partner by its Affiliates). The General
Partner shall determine the expenses that are allocable to the
Partnership. Reimbursements pursuant to this Section 7.4
shall be in addition to any reimbursement to the General Partner
as a result of indemnification pursuant to Section 7.7.
(c) The General Partner, without the approval of the
Limited Partners (who shall have no right to vote in respect
thereof), may propose and adopt on behalf of the Partnership
employee benefit plans, employee programs and employee practices
(including plans, programs and practices involving the issuance
of Partnership Securities or options to purchase or rights,
warrants or appreciation rights relating to Partnership
Securities), or cause the Partnership to issue Partnership
Securities in connection with, or pursuant to, any employee
benefit plan, employee program or employee practice maintained
or sponsored by the General Partner or any of its Affiliates, in
each case for the benefit of employees of the General Partner,
any Group Member or any Affiliate, or any of them, in respect of
services performed, directly or indirectly, for the benefit of
the Partnership Group. The Partnership agrees to issue and sell
to the General Partner or any of its Affiliates any Partnership
Securities that the General Partner or such Affiliates are
obligated to provide to any employees pursuant to any such
employee benefit plans, employee programs or employee practices.
Expenses incurred by the General Partner in connection with any
such plans, programs and practices (including the net cost to
the General Partner or such Affiliates of Partnership Securities
purchased by the General Partner or such Affiliates from the
Partnership to fulfill options or awards under such plans,
programs and practices) shall be reimbursed in accordance with
Section 7.4(b). Any and all obligations of the General
Partner under any employee benefit plans, employee programs or
employee practices adopted by the General Partner as permitted
by this Section 7.4(c) shall constitute obligations of the
General Partner hereunder and shall be assumed by any successor
General Partner approved pursuant to Section 11.1 or 11.2
or the transferee of or successor to all of the General
Partners General Partner Interest pursuant to
Section 4.6.
Section 7.5 Outside
Activities.
(a) After the Closing Date, the General Partner, for so
long as it is the General Partner of the Partnership
(i) agrees that its sole business will be to act as a
general partner or managing member, as the case may be, of the
Partnership and any other partnership or limited liability
company of which the Partnership or the Operating Company is,
directly or indirectly, a partner or member and to undertake
A-43
activities that are ancillary or related thereto (including
being a limited partner in the Partnership), (ii) shall not
engage in any business or activity or incur any debts or
liabilities except in connection with or incidental to
(A) its performance as general partner or managing member,
if any, of one or more Group Members or as described in or
contemplated by the Registration Statement or (B) the
acquiring, owning or disposing of debt or equity securities in
any Group Member and (iii) except to the extent permitted
in the Omnibus Agreement, shall not, and shall cause its
controlled Affiliates not to, engage in any Teekay Restricted
Businesses.
(b) Teekay Shipping Corporation and certain of its
Affiliates have entered into the Omnibus Agreement, which
agreement sets forth certain restrictions on the ability of
Teekay Shipping Corporation and its Affiliates to engage in
Teekay Restricted Businesses.
(c) Except as specifically restricted by
Section 7.5(a) and the Omnibus Agreement, each Indemnitee
(other than the General Partner) shall have the right to engage
in businesses of every type and description and other activities
for profit and to engage in and possess an interest in other
business ventures of any and every type or description, whether
in businesses engaged in or anticipated to be engaged in by any
Group Member, independently or with others, including business
interests and activities in direct competition with the business
and activities of any Group Member, and none of the same shall
constitute a breach of this Agreement or any duty expressed or
implied by law to any Group Member or any Partner or Assignee.
None of any Group Member, any Limited Partner or any other
Person shall have any rights by virtue of this Agreement, any
Group Member Agreement, or the partnership relationship
established hereby in any business ventures of any Indemnitee.
(d) Subject to the terms of Section 7.5(a),
Section 7.5(b), Section 7.5(c) and the Omnibus
Agreement, but otherwise notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this Agreement, (i) the engaging in competitive
activities by any Indemnitees (other than the General Partner)
in accordance with the provisions of this Section 7.5 is
hereby approved by the Partnership and all Partners,
(ii) it shall be deemed not to be a breach of any fiduciary
duty or any other obligation of any type whatsoever of the
General Partner or of any Indemnitee for the Indemnitees (other
than the General Partner) to engage in such business interests
and activities in preference to or to the exclusion of the
Partnership and (iii) except as set forth in the Omnibus
Agreement, the General Partner and the Indemnitees shall have no
obligation hereunder or as a result of any duty expressed or
implied by law to present business opportunities to the
Partnership.
(e) The General Partner and each of its Affiliates may
acquire Units or other Partnership Securities in addition to
those acquired on the Closing Date and, except as otherwise
provided in this Agreement, shall be entitled to exercise, at
their option, all rights relating to all Units or other
Partnership Securities acquired by them.
(f) The term Affiliates when used in
Section 7.5(a) and Section 7.5(e) with respect to the
General Partner shall not include any Group Member.
(g) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, to the extent that any provision of this Agreement
purports or is interpreted to have the effect of restricting the
fiduciary duties that might otherwise, as a result of Marshall
Islands law or other applicable law, be owed by the General
Partner to the Partnership and its Limited Partners, or to
constitute a waiver or consent by the Limited Partners to any
such restriction, such provisions shall be inapplicable and have
no effect in determining whether the General Partner has
complied with its fiduciary duties in connection with
determinations made by it under this Section 7.5.
Section 7.6 Loans
from the General Partner; Loans or Contributions from the
Partnership or Group Members.
(a) The General Partner or any of its Affiliates may lend
to any Group Member, and any Group Member may borrow from the
General Partner or any of its Affiliates, funds needed or
desired by the Group Member for such periods of time and in such
amounts as the General Partner may determine; provided,
however, that in any such case the lending party may not
charge the borrowing party interest at
A-44
a rate greater than the rate that would be charged the borrowing
party or impose terms less favorable to the borrowing party than
would be charged or imposed on the borrowing party by unrelated
lenders on comparable loans made on an arms-length basis
(without reference to the lending partys financial
abilities or guarantees), all as determined by the General
Partner. The borrowing party shall reimburse the lending party
for any costs (other than any additional interest costs)
incurred by the lending party in connection with the borrowing
of such funds. For purposes of this Section 7.6(a) and
Section 7.6(b), the term Group Member shall
include any Affiliate of a Group Member that is controlled by
the Group Member.
(b) The Partnership may lend or contribute to any Group
Member, and any Group Member may borrow from the Partnership,
funds on terms and conditions determined by the General Partner.
No Group Member may lend funds to the General Partner or any of
its Affiliates (other than another Group Member).
(c) No borrowing by any Group Member or the approval
thereof by the General Partner shall be deemed to constitute a
breach of any duty, expressed or implied, of the General Partner
or its Affiliates to the Partnership or the Limited Partners by
reason of the fact that the purpose or effect of such borrowing
is directly or indirectly to (i) enable distributions to
the General Partner or its Affiliates (including in their
capacities as Limited Partners) to exceed the General
Partners Percentage Interest of the total amount
distributed to all partners or (ii) hasten the expiration
of the Subordination Period or the conversion of any
Subordinated Units into Common Units.
Section 7.7 Indemnification.
(a) To the fullest extent permitted by law but subject to
the limitations expressly provided in this Agreement, all
Indemnitees shall be indemnified and held harmless by the
Partnership from and against any and all losses, claims,
damages, liabilities, joint or several, expenses (including
legal fees and expenses), judgments, fines, penalties, interest,
settlements or other amounts arising from any and all claims,
demands, actions, suits or proceedings, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, in which any Indemnitee may be
involved, or is threatened to be involved, as a party or
otherwise, by reason of its status as an Indemnitee;
provided, that the Indemnitee shall not be indemnified
and held harmless if there has been a final and non-appealable
judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction
determining that, in respect of the matter for which the
Indemnitee is seeking indemnification pursuant to this
Section 7.7, the Indemnitee acted in bad faith or engaged
in fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence or, in the case
of a criminal matter, acted with knowledge that the
Indemnitees conduct was unlawful; provided,
further, no indemnification pursuant to this Section 7.7
shall be available to the General Partner or its Affiliates
(other than a Group Member) with respect to its or their
obligations incurred pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the
Omnibus Agreement or the Contribution Agreement (other than
obligations incurred by the General Partner on behalf of the
Partnership). Any indemnification pursuant to this
Section 7.7 shall be made only out of the assets of the
Partnership, it being agreed that the General Partner shall not
be personally liable for such indemnification and shall have no
obligation to contribute or loan any monies or property to the
Partnership to enable it to effectuate such indemnification.
(b) To the fullest extent permitted by law, expenses
(including legal fees and expenses) incurred by an Indemnitee
who is indemnified pursuant to Section 7.7(a) in defending
any claim, demand, action, suit or proceeding shall, from time
to time, be advanced by the Partnership prior to a determination
that the Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified upon
receipt by the Partnership of any undertaking by or on behalf of
the Indemnitee to repay such amount if it shall be determined
that the Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified as
authorized in this Section 7.7.
(c) The indemnification provided by this Section 7.7
shall be in addition to any other rights to which an Indemnitee
may be entitled under any agreement, pursuant to any vote of the
holders of Outstanding Limited Partner Interests, as a matter of
law or otherwise, both as to actions in the Indemnitees
capacity as an Indemnitee and as to actions in any other
capacity (including any capacity under the Underwriting
Agreement), and shall continue as to an Indemnitee who has
ceased to serve in such capacity and shall inure to the benefit
of the heirs, successors, assigns and administrators of the
Indemnitee.
A-45
(d) The Partnership may purchase and maintain (or reimburse
the General Partner or its Affiliates for the cost of)
insurance, on behalf of the General Partner, its Affiliates and
such other Persons as the General Partner shall determine,
against any liability that may be asserted against, or expense
that may be incurred by, such Person in connection with the
Partnerships activities or such Persons activities
on behalf of the Partnership, regardless of whether the
Partnership would have the power to indemnify such Person
against such liability under the provisions of this Agreement.
(e) For purposes of this Section 7.7, the Partnership
shall be deemed to have requested an Indemnitee to serve as
fiduciary of an employee benefit plan whenever the performance
by it of its duties to the Partnership also imposes duties on,
or otherwise involves services by, it to the plan or
participants or beneficiaries of the plan; excise taxes assessed
on an Indemnitee with respect to an employee benefit plan
pursuant to applicable law shall constitute fines
within the meaning of Section 7.7(a); and action taken or
omitted by it with respect to any employee benefit plan in the
performance of its duties for a purpose reasonably believed by
it to be in the best interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan shall be deemed to be for a purpose
that is in the best interests of the Partnership.
(f) In no event may an Indemnitee subject the Limited
Partners to personal liability by reason of the indemnification
provisions set forth in this Agreement.
(g) An Indemnitee shall not be denied indemnification in
whole or in part under this Section 7.7 because the
Indemnitee had an interest in the transaction with respect to
which the indemnification applies if the transaction was
otherwise permitted by the terms of this Agreement.
(h) The provisions of this Section 7.7 are for the
benefit of the Indemnitees, their heirs, successors, assigns and
administrators and shall not be deemed to create any rights for
the benefit of any other Persons.
(i) No amendment, modification or repeal of this
Section 7.7 or any provision hereof shall in any manner
terminate, reduce or impair the right of any past, present or
future Indemnitee to be indemnified by the Partnership, nor the
obligations of the Partnership to indemnify any such Indemnitee
under and in accordance with the provisions of this
Section 7.7 as in effect immediately prior to such
amendment, modification or repeal with respect to claims arising
from or relating to matters occurring, in whole or in part,
prior to such amendment, modification or repeal, regardless of
when such claims may arise or be asserted.
Section 7.8 Liability
of Indemnitees.
(a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in
this Agreement, no Indemnitee shall be liable for monetary
damages to the Partnership, the Limited Partners, the Assignees
or any other Persons who have acquired interests in the
Partnership Securities, for losses sustained or liabilities
incurred as a result of any act or omission of an Indemnitee
unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment
entered by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that,
in respect of the matter in question, the Indemnitee acted in
bad faith or engaged in fraud, willful misconduct or gross
negligence or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with
knowledge that the Indemnitees conduct was criminal.
(b) Subject to its obligations and duties as General
Partner set forth in Section 7.1(a), the General Partner
may exercise any of the powers granted to it by this Agreement
and perform any of the duties imposed upon it hereunder either
directly or by or through its agents, and the General Partner
shall not be responsible for any misconduct or negligence on the
part of any such agent appointed by the General Partner in good
faith.
(c) To the extent that, at law or in equity, an Indemnitee
has duties (including fiduciary duties) and liabilities relating
thereto to the Partnership or to the Partners, the General
Partner and any other Indemnitee acting in connection with the
Partnerships business or affairs shall not be liable to
the Partnership or to any Partner for its good faith reliance on
the provisions of this Agreement.
(d) Any amendment, modification or repeal of this
Section 7.8 or any provision hereof shall be prospective
only and shall not in any way affect the limitations on the
liability of the Indemnitees under
A-46
this Section 7.8 as in effect immediately prior to such
amendment, modification or repeal with respect to claims arising
from or relating to matters occurring, in whole or in part,
prior to such amendment, modification or repeal, regardless of
when such claims may arise or be asserted.
Section 7.9 Resolution
of Conflicts of Interest; Standards of Conduct and Modification
of Duties.
(a) Unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement
or any Group Member Agreement, whenever a potential conflict of
interest exists or arises between the General Partner or any of
its Affiliates, on the one hand, and the Partnership, any Group
Member, any Partner or any Assignee, on the other, any
resolution or course of action by the General Partner or its
Affiliates in respect of such conflict of interest shall be
permitted and deemed approved by all Partners, and shall not
constitute a breach of this Agreement, of any Group Member
Agreement, of any agreement contemplated herein or therein, or
of any duty stated or implied by law or equity, if the
resolution or course of action in respect of such conflict of
interest is (i) approved by Special Approval,
(ii) approved by the vote of a majority of the Common Units
(excluding Common Units owned by the General Partner and its
Affiliates), (iii) on terms no less favorable to the
Partnership than those generally being provided to or available
from unrelated third parties or (iv) fair and reasonable to
the Partnership, taking into account the totality of the
relationships between the parties involved (including other
transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous
to the Partnership). The General Partner shall be authorized but
not required in connection with its resolution of such conflict
of interest to seek Special Approval of such resolution, and the
General Partner may also adopt a resolution or course of action
that has not received Special Approval. If Special Approval is
not sought and the Board of Directors of the General Partner
determines that the resolution or course of action taken with
respect to a conflict of interest satisfies either of the
standards set forth in clauses (iii) or (iv) above,
then it shall be presumed that, in making its decision, the
Board of Directors of the General Partner acted in good faith,
and in any proceeding brought by any Limited Partner or Assignee
or by or on behalf of such Limited Partner or Assignee or any
other Limited Partner or Assignee or the Partnership challenging
such approval, the Person bringing or prosecuting such
proceeding shall have the burden of overcoming such presumption.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the
existence of the conflicts of interest described in the
Registration Statement are hereby approved by all Partners.
(b) Whenever the General Partner makes a determination or
takes or declines to take any other action, or any of its
Affiliates causes it to do so, in its capacity as the general
partner of the Partnership as opposed to in its individual
capacity, whether under this Agreement, any Group Member
Agreement or any other agreement contemplated hereby or
otherwise, then, unless another express standard is provided for
in this Agreement, the General Partner, or such Affiliates
causing it to do so, shall make such determination or take or
decline to take such other action in good faith and shall not be
subject to any other or different standards imposed by this
Agreement, any Group Member Agreement, any other agreement
contemplated hereby or under the Marshall Islands Act or any
other law, rule or regulation. In order for a determination or
other action to be in good faith for purposes of
this Agreement, the Person or Persons making such determination
or taking or declining to take such other action must reasonably
believe that the determination or other action is in the best
interests of the Partnership, unless the context otherwise
requires.
(c) Whenever the General Partner makes a determination or
takes or declines to take any other action, or any of its
Affiliates causes it to do so, in its individual capacity as
opposed to in its capacity as the general partner of the
Partnership, whether under this Agreement, any Group Member
Agreement or any other agreement contemplated hereby or
otherwise, then the General Partner, or such Affiliates causing
it to do so, are entitled to make such determination or to take
or decline to take such other action free of any fiduciary duty
or obligation whatsoever to the Partnership, any Limited Partner
or Assignee, and the General Partner, or such Affiliates causing
it to do so, shall not be required to act in good faith or
pursuant to any other standard imposed by this Agreement, any
Group Member Agreement, any other agreement contemplated hereby
or under the Marshall Islands Act or any other law, rule or
regulation. By way of illustration and not of limitation,
whenever the phrase, at the option of the General
Partner, or some variation of that phrase, is used in this
Agreement, it indicates that the General Partner is acting in
its individual capacity.
A-47
(d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, the General Partner and its Affiliates shall have no
duty or obligation, express or implied, to (i) sell or
otherwise dispose of any asset of the Partnership Group other
than in the ordinary course of business or (ii) permit any
Group Member to use any facilities or assets of the General
Partner and its Affiliates, except as may be provided in
contracts entered into from time to time specifically dealing
with such use. Any determination by the General Partner or any
of its Affiliates to enter into such contracts shall be at its
option.
(e) Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement,
neither the General Partner nor any other Indemnitee shall have
any duties or liabilities, including fiduciary duties, to the
Partnership or any Limited Partner or Assignee and the
provisions of this Agreement, to the extent that they restrict
or otherwise modify the duties and liabilities, including
fiduciary duties, of the General Partner or any other Indemnitee
otherwise existing at law or in equity, are agreed by the
Partners to replace such other duties and liabilities of the
General Partner or such other Indemnitee.
(f) The Unitholders hereby authorize the General Partner,
on behalf of the Partnership as a partner or member of a Group
Member, to approve of actions by the general partner or managing
member of such Group Member similar to those actions permitted
to be taken by the General Partner pursuant to this
Section 7.9.
Section 7.10 Other
Matters Concerning the General Partner.
(a) The General Partner may rely and shall be protected in
acting or refraining from acting upon any resolution,
certificate, statement, instrument, opinion, report, notice,
request, consent, order, bond, debenture or other paper or
document believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed or
presented by the proper party or parties.
(b) The General Partner may consult with legal counsel,
accountants, appraisers, management consultants, investment
bankers and other consultants and advisers selected by it, and
any act taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon the
opinion (including an Opinion of Counsel) of such Persons as to
matters that the General Partner reasonably believes to be
within such Persons professional or expert competence
shall be conclusively presumed to have been done or omitted in
good faith and in accordance with such opinion.
(c) The General Partner shall have the right, in respect of
any of its powers or obligations hereunder, to act through any
of its duly authorized officers, a duly appointed attorney or
attorneys-in-fact or the duly authorized officers of the
Partnership.
Section 7.11 Purchase
or Sale of Partnership Securities.
The General Partner may cause the Partnership to purchase or
otherwise acquire Partnership Securities; provided that
the General Partner may not cause any Group Member to purchase
Subordinated Units during the Subordination Period. As long as
Partnership Securities are held by any Group Member, such
Partnership Securities shall not be considered Outstanding for
any purpose, except as otherwise provided herein. The General
Partner or any Affiliate of the General Partner may also
purchase or otherwise acquire and sell or otherwise dispose of
Partnership Securities for its own account, subject to the
provisions of Articles IV and X.
Section 7.12 Registration
Rights of the General Partner and its Affiliates.
(a) If (i) the General Partner or any Affiliate of the
General Partner (including for purposes of this
Section 7.12, any Person that is an Affiliate of the
General Partner at the date hereof notwithstanding that it may
later cease to be an Affiliate of the General Partner) or any of
their assignees holds Partnership Securities that it desires to
sell and (ii) Rule 144 of the Securities Act (or any
successor rule or regulation to Rule 144) or another
exemption from registration is not available to enable such
holder of Partnership Securities (the Holder) to
dispose of the number of Partnership Securities it desires to
sell at the time it desires to do so without registration under
the Securities Act, then at the option and upon the request of
the Holder, the Partnership shall file with the Commission as
promptly as practicable after receiving such request, and use
all reasonable efforts to cause to become effective and remain
effective for
A-48
a period of not less than six months following its effective
date or such shorter period as shall terminate when all
Partnership Securities covered by such registration statement
have been sold, a registration statement under the Securities
Act registering the offering and sale of the number of
Partnership Securities specified by the Holder; provided,
however, that the Partnership shall not be required to
effect more than three registrations pursuant to this
Section 7.12(a); and provided further, however, that if the
Conflicts Committee determines that a postponement of the
requested registration for up to six months would be in the best
interests of the Partnership and its Partners due to a pending
transaction, investigation or other event, the filing of such
registration statement or the effectiveness thereof may be
deferred for up to six months, but not thereafter. In connection
with any registration pursuant to the immediately preceding
sentence, the Partnership shall (i) promptly prepare and
file (A) such documents as may be necessary to register or
qualify the securities subject to such registration under the
securities laws of such states as the Holder shall reasonably
request; provided, however, that no such qualification
shall be required in any jurisdiction where, as a result
thereof, the Partnership would become subject to general service
of process or to taxation or qualification to do business as a
foreign corporation or partnership doing business in such
jurisdiction solely as a result of such registration, and
(B) such documents as may be necessary to apply for listing
or to list the Partnership Securities subject to such
registration on such National Securities Exchange as the Holder
shall reasonably request, and (ii) do any and all other
acts and things that may be necessary or appropriate to enable
the Holder to consummate a public sale of such Partnership
Securities in such states. Except as set forth in
Section 7.12(c), all costs and expenses of any such
registration and offering (other than the underwriting discounts
and commissions) shall be paid by the Partnership, without
reimbursement by the Holder.
(b) If the Partnership shall at any time propose to file a
registration statement under the Securities Act for an offering
of equity securities of the Partnership for cash (other than an
offering relating solely to an employee benefit plan), the
Partnership shall use all reasonable efforts to include such
number or amount of securities held by the Holder in such
registration statement as the Holder shall request; provided,
that the Partnership is not required to make any effort or take
any action to so include the securities of the Holder once the
registration statement is declared effective by the Commission,
including any registration statement providing for the offering
from time to time of securities pursuant to Rule 415 of the
Securities Act. If the proposed offering pursuant to this
Section 7.12(b) shall be an underwritten offering, then, in
the event that the managing underwriter or managing underwriters
of such offering advise the Partnership and the Holder in
writing that in their opinion the inclusion of all or some of
the Holders Partnership Securities would adversely and
materially affect the success of the offering, the Partnership
shall include in such offering only that number or amount, if
any, of securities held by the Holder that, in the opinion of
the managing underwriter or managing underwriters, will not so
adversely and materially affect the offering. Except as set
forth in Section 7.12(c), all costs and expenses of any
such registration and offering (other than the underwriting
discounts and commissions) shall be paid by the Partnership,
without reimbursement by the Holder.
(c) If underwriters are engaged in connection with any
registration referred to in this Section 7.12, the
Partnership shall provide indemnification, representations,
covenants, opinions and other assurance to the underwriters in
form and substance reasonably satisfactory to such underwriters.
Further, in addition to and not in limitation of the
Partnerships obligation under Section 7.7, the
Partnership shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law,
indemnify and hold harmless the Holder, its officers, directors
and each Person who controls the Holder (within the meaning of
the Securities Act) and any agent thereof (collectively,
Indemnified Persons) against any losses, claims,
demands, actions, causes of action, assessments, damages,
liabilities (joint or several), costs and expenses (including
interest, penalties and reasonable attorneys fees and
disbursements), resulting to, imposed upon, or incurred by the
Indemnified Persons, directly or indirectly, under the
Securities Act or otherwise (hereinafter referred to in this
Section 7.12(c) as a claim and in the plural as
claims) based upon, arising out of or resulting from
any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of any material
fact contained in any registration statement under which any
Partnership Securities were registered under the Securities Act
or any state securities or Blue Sky laws, in any preliminary
prospectus (if used prior to the effective date of such
registration statement), or in any summary or final prospectus
or in any amendment or supplement thereto (if used during the
A-49
period the Partnership is required to keep the registration
statement current), or arising out of, based upon or resulting
from the omission or alleged omission to state therein a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements made therein not misleading; provided,
however, that the Partnership shall not be liable to any
Indemnified Person to the extent that any such claim arises out
of, is based upon or results from an untrue statement or alleged
untrue statement or omission or alleged omission made in such
registration statement, such preliminary, summary or final
prospectus or such amendment or supplement, in reliance upon and
in conformity with written information furnished to the
Partnership by or on behalf of such Indemnified Person
specifically for use in the preparation thereof.
(d) The provisions of Section 7.12(a) and
Section 7.12(b) shall continue to be applicable with
respect to the General Partner (and any of the General
Partners Affiliates and any of the General Partners
or its Affiliates assignees) after it ceases to be a
Partner of the Partnership, during a period of two years
subsequent to the effective date of such cessation and for so
long thereafter as is required for the Holder to sell all of the
Partnership Securities with respect to which it has requested
during such two-year period inclusion in a registration
statement otherwise filed or that a registration statement be
filed; provided, however, that the Partnership shall not
be required to file successive registration statements covering
the same Partnership Securities for which registration was
demanded during such two-year period. The provisions of
Section 7.12(c) shall continue in effect thereafter.
(e) Any request to register Partnership Securities pursuant
to this Section 7.12 shall (i) specify the Partnership
Securities intended to be offered and sold by the Person making
the request, (ii) express such Persons present intent
to offer such Partnership Securities for distribution,
(iii) describe the nature or method of the proposed offer
and sale of Partnership Securities, and (iv) contain the
undertaking of such Person to provide all such information and
materials and take all action as may be required in order to
permit the Partnership to comply with all applicable
requirements in connection with the registration of such
Partnership Securities.
Section 7.13 Reliance
by Third Parties.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, any
Person dealing with the Partnership shall be entitled to assume
that the General Partner and any officer of the General Partner
authorized by the General Partner to act on behalf of and in the
name of the Partnership has full power and authority to
encumber, sell or otherwise use in any manner any and all assets
of the Partnership and to enter into any authorized contracts on
behalf of the Partnership, and such Person shall be entitled to
deal with the General Partner or any such officer as if it were
the Partnerships sole party in interest, both legally and
beneficially. Each Limited Partner hereby waives any and all
defenses or other remedies that may be available against such
Person to contest, negate or disaffirm any action of the General
Partner or any such officer in connection with any such dealing.
In no event shall any Person dealing with the General Partner or
any such officer or its representatives be obligated to
ascertain that the terms of this Agreement have been complied
with or to inquire into the necessity or expedience of any act
or action of the General Partner or any such officer or its
representatives. Each and every certificate, document or other
instrument executed on behalf of the Partnership by the General
Partner or its representatives shall be conclusive evidence in
favor of any and every Person relying thereon or claiming
thereunder that (a) at the time of the execution and
delivery of such certificate, document or instrument, this
Agreement was in full force and effect, (b) the Person
executing and delivering such certificate, document or
instrument was duly authorized and empowered to do so for and on
behalf of the Partnership and (c) such certificate,
document or instrument was duly executed and delivered in
accordance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement and
is binding upon the Partnership.
A-50
ARTICLE VIII
Books, Records, Accounting
and Reports
Section 8.1 Records
and Accounting.
The General Partner shall keep or cause to be kept at the
principal office of the Partnership appropriate books and
records with respect to the Partnerships business,
including all books and records necessary to provide to the
Limited Partners any information required to be provided
pursuant to Section 3.4(a). Any books and records
maintained by or on behalf of the Partnership in the regular
course of its business, including the record of the Record
Holders and Assignees of Units or other Partnership Securities,
books of account and records of Partnership proceedings, may be
kept on, or be in the form of, computer disks, hard drives,
punch cards, magnetic tape, photographs, micrographics or any
other information storage device; provided, that the
books and records so maintained are convertible into clearly
legible written form within a reasonable period of time. The
books of the Partnership shall be maintained, for financial
reporting purposes, on an accrual basis in accordance with
U.S. GAAP.
Section 8.2 Fiscal
Year.
The fiscal year of the Partnership shall be a fiscal year ending
December 31.
Section 8.3 Reports.
(a) As soon as practicable, but in no event later than
120 days after the close of each fiscal year of the
Partnership, the General Partner shall cause to be mailed or
made available to each Record Holder of a Unit as of a date
selected by the General Partner, an annual report containing
financial statements of the Partnership for such fiscal year of
the Partnership, presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP,
including a balance sheet and statements of operations,
Partnership equity and cash flows, such statements to be audited
by a firm of independent public accountants selected by the
General Partner.
(b) As soon as practicable, but in no event later than
90 days after the close of each Quarter except the last
Quarter of each fiscal year, the General Partner shall cause to
be mailed or made available to each Record Holder of a Unit, as
of a date selected by the General Partner, a report containing
unaudited financial statements of the Partnership and such other
information as may be required by applicable law, regulation or
rule of any National Securities Exchange on which the Units are
listed, or as the General Partner determines to be necessary or
appropriate.
ARTICLE IX
Tax Matters
Section 9.1 Tax
Returns and Information.
The Partnership shall timely file all returns of the Partnership
that are required for foreign, federal, state and local income
tax purposes on the basis of the accrual method and a taxable
year ending on December 31. The tax information reasonably
required by Record Holders for federal and state income tax
reporting purposes with respect to a taxable year shall be
furnished to them within 90 days of the close of the
calendar year in which the Partnerships taxable year ends.
The classification, realization and recognition of income, gain,
losses and deductions and other items shall be on the accrual
method of accounting for United States federal income tax
purposes.
Section 9.2 Tax
Elections.
(a) The Partnership shall make the election under
Section 754 of the Code in accordance with applicable
regulations thereunder, subject to the reservation of the right
to seek to revoke any such election upon the General
Partners determination that such revocation is in the best
interests of the Limited Partners. Notwithstanding any other
provision herein contained, for the purposes of computing the
adjustments under Section 743(b) of the Code, the General
Partner shall be authorized (but not required) to adopt a
convention whereby the price paid by a transferee of a Limited
Partner Interest will be deemed
A-51
to be the lowest quoted closing price of the Limited Partner
Interests on any National Securities Exchange on which such
Limited Partner Interests are listed during the calendar month
in which such transfer is deemed to occur pursuant to
Section 6.2(g) without regard to the actual price paid by
such transferee.
(b) Except as otherwise provided herein, the General
Partner shall determine whether the Partnership should make any
other elections permitted by the Code.
Section 9.3 Tax
Controversies.
Subject to the provisions hereof, the General Partner is
designated as the Tax Matters Partner (as defined in the Code)
and is authorized and required to represent the Partnership (at
the Partnerships expense) in connection with all
examinations of the Partnerships affairs by tax
authorities, including resulting administrative and judicial
proceedings, and to expend Partnership funds for professional
services and costs associated therewith. Each Partner agrees to
cooperate with the General Partner and to do or refrain from
doing any or all things reasonably required by the General
Partner to conduct such proceedings.
Section 9.4 Withholding.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the
General Partner is authorized to take any action that may be
required to cause the Partnership and other Group Members to
comply with any withholding requirements established under the
Code or any other federal, state or local law including, without
limitation, pursuant to Sections 1441, 1442, 1445 and 1446
of the Code. To the extent that the Partnership is required or
elects to withhold and pay over to any taxing authority any
amount resulting from the allocation or distribution of income
to any Partner or Assignee (including, without limitation, by
reason of Section 1446 of the Code), the General Partner
may treat the amount withheld as a distribution of cash pursuant
to Section 6.3 in the amount of such withholding from such
Partner.
Section 9.5 Conduct
of Operations.
The General Partner shall use commercially reasonable efforts to
conduct the business of the Partnership and its Affiliates in a
manner that does not require a holder of Common Units to file a
tax return in any jurisdiction with which the holder has no
contact other than through ownership of Common Units.
For greater certainty, the General Partner shall conduct the
affairs and governance of the Partnership so that the General
Partner and the Partnership are not residents of Canada for
purposes of Canadas tax legislation and neither the
General Partner not the Partnership is carrying on business in
Canada for purposes of such legislation.
ARTICLE X
Admission of Partners
Section 10.1 Admission
of Initial Limited Partners.
Upon the issuance by the Partnership of Common Units,
Subordinated Units and Incentive Distribution Rights to the
General Partner, Teekay Shipping Corporation and the
Underwriters as described in Sections 5.2 and 5.3 in
connection with the Initial Offering, the General Partner shall
admit such parties to the Partnership as Initial Limited
Partners in respect of the Common Units, Subordinated Units or
Incentive Distribution Rights issued to them.
Section 10.2 Admission
of Substituted Limited Partners.
By transfer of a Limited Partner Interest in accordance with
Article IV, the transferor shall be deemed to have given
the transferee the right to seek admission as a Substituted
Limited Partner subject to the conditions of, and in the manner
permitted under, this Agreement. A transferor of a Certificate
representing a Limited Partner Interest shall, however, only
have the authority to convey to a purchaser or other transferee
who does not execute and deliver a Transfer Application
(a) the right to negotiate such
A-52
Certificate to a purchaser or other transferee and (b) the
right to transfer the right to request admission as a
Substituted Limited Partner to such purchaser or other
transferee in respect of the transferred Limited Partner
Interests. Each transferee of a Limited Partner Interest
(including any nominee holder or an agent acquiring such Limited
Partner Interest for the account of another Person) who executes
and delivers a Transfer Application shall, by virtue of such
execution and delivery, be an Assignee. Such Assignee shall
automatically be admitted to the Partnership as a Substituted
Limited Partner with respect to the Limited Partner Interests so
transferred to such Person at such time as such transfer is
recorded on the books and records of the Partnership, and until
so recorded, such transferee shall be an Assignee. The General
Partner shall periodically, but no less frequently than on the
first Business Day of each calendar quarter, cause any
unrecorded transfers of Limited Partner Interests with respect
to which a duly executed Transfer Application has been received
to be recorded in the books and records of the Partnership. An
Assignee shall have an interest in the Partnership equivalent to
that of a Limited Partner with respect to allocations and
distributions, including liquidating distributions, of the
Partnership. With respect to voting rights attributable to
Limited Partner Interests that are held by Assignees, the
General Partner shall be deemed to be the Limited Partner with
respect thereto and shall, in exercising the voting rights in
respect of such Limited Partner Interests on any matter, vote
such Limited Partner Interests at the written direction of the
Assignee who is the Record Holder of such Limited Partner
Interests. If no such written direction is received, such
Limited Partner Interests will not be voted. An Assignee shall
have no other rights of a Limited Partner.
Section 10.3 Admission
of Successor General Partner.
A successor General Partner approved pursuant to
Section 11.1 or 11.2 or the transferee of or successor to
all of the General Partner Interest pursuant to Section 4.6
who is proposed to be admitted as a successor General Partner
shall be admitted to the Partnership as the General Partner,
effective immediately prior to the withdrawal or removal of the
predecessor or transferring General Partner, pursuant to
Section 11.1 or 11.2 or the transfer of the General Partner
Interest pursuant to Section 4.6, provided, however,
that no such successor shall be admitted to the Partnership
until compliance with the terms of Section 4.6 has occurred
and such successor has executed and delivered such other
documents or instruments as may be required to effect such
admission. Any such successor shall, subject to the terms
hereof, carry on the business of the members of the Partnership
Group without dissolution.
Section 10.4 Admission
of Additional Limited Partners.
(a) A Person (other than the General Partner, an Initial
Limited Partner or a Substituted Limited Partner) who makes a
Capital Contribution to the Partnership in accordance with this
Agreement shall be admitted to the Partnership as an Additional
Limited Partner only upon furnishing to the General Partner:
|
|
|
(i) evidence of acceptance in form satisfactory to the
General Partner of all of the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, including the power of attorney granted in
Section 2.6, and |
|
|
(ii) such other documents or instruments as may be required
by the General Partner to effect such Persons admission as
an Additional Limited Partner. |
(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Section 10.4, no Person shall be admitted as an Additional
Limited Partner without the consent of the General Partner. The
admission of any Person as an Additional Limited Partner shall
become effective on the date upon which the name of such Person
is recorded as such in the books and records of the Partnership,
following the consent of the General Partner to such admission.
Section 10.5 Amendment
of Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership.
To effect the admission to the Partnership of any Partner, the
General Partner shall take all steps necessary or appropriate
under the Marshall Islands Act to amend the records of the
Partnership to reflect such admission and, if necessary, to
prepare as soon as practicable an amendment to this Agreement
and, if required by law, the General Partner shall prepare and
file an amendment to the Certificate of Limited
A-53
Partnership and the General Partner may for this purpose, among
others, exercise the power of attorney granted pursuant to
Section 2.6.
ARTICLE XI
Withdrawal or Removal of
Partners
Section 11.1 Withdrawal
of the General Partner.
(a) The General Partner shall be deemed to have withdrawn
from the Partnership upon the occurrence of any one of the
following events (each such event herein referred to as an
Event of Withdrawal);
|
|
|
(i) The General Partner voluntarily withdraws from the
Partnership by giving written notice to the other Partners; |
|
|
(ii) The General Partner transfers all of its rights as
General Partner pursuant to Section 4.6; |
|
|
(iii) The General Partner is removed pursuant to
Section 11.2; |
|
|
(iv) The General Partner (A) makes a general
assignment for the benefit of creditors; (B) files a
voluntary petition in bankruptcy; (C) files a petition or
answer seeking for itself a liquidation, dissolution or similar
relief (but not a reorganization) under any law; (D) files
an answer or other pleading admitting or failing to contest the
material allegations of a petition filed against the General
Partner in a proceeding of the type described in
clauses (A)-(B) of this Section 11.1(a)(iv); or
(E) seeks, consents to or acquiesces in the appointment of
a trustee, receiver or liquidator of the General Partner or of
all or any substantial part of its properties; |
|
|
(v) The General Partner is adjudged bankrupt or insolvent,
or has entered against him or her an order for relief in any
bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding; |
|
|
(vi) (A) in the case of a general partner that is a
corporation, the filing of a certificate of dissolution, or its
equivalent, for the corporation or the revocation of its charter
and the expiration of ninety (90) days after the date of
notice to the corporation of revocation without a reinstatement
of its charter; (B) in the event the General Partner is a
partnership or a limited liability company, the dissolution and
commencement of winding up of the General Partner; (C) in
the event the General Partner is acting in such capacity by
virtue of being a trustee of a trust, the termination of the
trust; (D) in the event the General Partner is a natural
person, his death or adjudication of incompetency; and
(E) otherwise in the event of the termination of the
General Partner. |
If an Event of Withdrawal specified in Section 11.1(a)(iv),
or (v)(A), (B), or (D) occurs, the withdrawing General
Partner shall give notice to the Limited Partners within
30 days after such occurrence. The Partners hereby agree
that only the Events of Withdrawal described in this
Section 11.1 shall result in the withdrawal of the General
Partner from the Partnership.
(b) Withdrawal of the General Partner from the Partnership
upon the occurrence of an Event of Withdrawal shall not
constitute a breach of this Agreement under the following
circumstances: (i) at any time during the period beginning
on the Closing Date and ending at 12:00 midnight, Eastern
Standard Time, on March 31, 2015, the General Partner
voluntarily withdraws by giving at least 90 days
advance notice of its intention to withdraw to the Limited
Partners; provided, that prior to the effective date of
such withdrawal, the withdrawal is approved by Unitholders
holding at least a majority of the Outstanding Common Units
(excluding Common Units held by the General Partner and its
Affiliates) and the General Partner delivers to the Partnership
an Opinion of Counsel (Withdrawal Opinion of
Counsel) that such withdrawal (following the selection of
the successor General Partner) would not result in the loss of
the limited liability of any Limited Partner or any Group Member
or cause any Group Member to be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation or otherwise to be taxed as an entity
for United States federal income tax purposes (to the extent not
already so treated or taxed); (ii) at any time after 12:00
midnight, Eastern Standard Time, on March 31, 2015, the
General Partner voluntarily withdraws by giving at least
A-54
90 days advance notice to the Unitholders, such
withdrawal to take effect on the date specified in such notice;
(iii) at any time that the General Partner ceases to be the
General Partner pursuant to Section 11.1(a)(ii) or is
removed pursuant to Section 11.2; or
(iv) notwithstanding clause (i) of this sentence, at
any time that the General Partner voluntarily withdraws by
giving at least 90 days advance notice of its
intention to withdraw to the Limited Partners, such withdrawal
to take effect on the date specified in the notice, if at the
time such notice is given one Person and its Affiliates (other
than the General Partner and its Affiliates) own beneficially or
of record or control at least 50% of the Outstanding Units. The
withdrawal of the General Partner from the Partnership upon the
occurrence of an Event of Withdrawal shall also constitute the
withdrawal of the General Partner as general partner or managing
member, if any, to the extent applicable, of the other Group
Members. If the General Partner gives a notice of withdrawal
pursuant to Section 11.1(a)(i), the holders of a Unit
Majority, may, prior to the effective date of such withdrawal,
elect a successor General Partner. The Person so elected as
successor General Partner shall automatically become the
successor general partner or managing member, to the extent
applicable, of the other Group Members of which the General
Partner is a general partner or a managing member. If, prior to
the effective date of the General Partners withdrawal, a
successor is not selected by the Unitholders as provided herein
or the Partnership does not receive a Withdrawal Opinion of
Counsel, the Partnership shall be dissolved in accordance with
Section 12.1. Any successor General Partner elected in
accordance with the terms of this Section 11.1 shall be
subject to the provisions of Section 10.3.
Section
11.2 Removal of the General
Partner.
The General Partner may be removed if such removal is approved
by the Unitholders holding at least
662/3%
of the Outstanding Units (including Units held by the General
Partner and its Affiliates voting as a single class). Any such
action by such holders for removal of the General Partner must
also provide for the election of a successor General Partner by
the Unitholders holding a majority of the outstanding Common
Units voting as a class and a majority of the outstanding
Subordinated Units voting as a class (including Units held by
the General Partner and its Affiliates). Such removal shall be
effective immediately following the admission of a successor
General Partner pursuant to Section 10.3. The removal of
the General Partner shall also automatically constitute the
removal of the General Partner as general partner or managing
member, to the extent applicable, of the other Group Members of
which the General Partner is a general partner or a managing
member. If a Person is elected as a successor General Partner in
accordance with the terms of this Section 11.2, such Person
shall, upon admission pursuant to Section 10.3,
automatically become a successor general partner or managing
member, to the extent applicable, of the other Group Members of
which the General Partner is a general partner or a managing
member. The right of the holders of Outstanding Units to remove
the General Partner shall not exist or be exercised unless the
Partnership has received an opinion opining as to the matters
covered by a Withdrawal Opinion of Counsel. Any successor
General Partner elected in accordance with the terms of this
Section 11.2 shall be subject to the provisions of
Section 10.3.
Section
11.3 Interest of Departing
Partner and Successor General Partner.
(a) In the event of (i) withdrawal of the General
Partner under circumstances where such withdrawal does not
violate this Agreement or (ii) removal of the General
Partner by the holders of Outstanding Units under circumstances
where Cause does not exist, if the successor General Partner is
elected in accordance with the terms of Section 11.1 or
11.2, the Departing Partner shall have the option, exercisable
prior to the effective date of the departure of such Departing
Partner, to require its successor to purchase its General
Partner Interest and its general partner interest (or equivalent
interest), if any, in the other Group Members and all of its
Incentive Distribution Rights (collectively, the Combined
Interest) in exchange for an amount in cash equal to the
fair market value of such Combined Interest, such amount to be
determined and payable as of the effective date of its
departure. If the General Partner is removed by the Unitholders
under circumstances where Cause exists or if the General Partner
withdraws under circumstances where such withdrawal violates
this Agreement, and if a successor General Partner is elected in
accordance with the terms of Section 11.1 or 11.2 (or if
the business of the Partnership is continued pursuant to
Section 12.2 and the successor General Partner is not the
former General Partner),
A-55
such successor shall have the option, exercisable prior to the
effective date of the departure of such Departing Partner (or,
in the event the business of the Partnership is continued, prior
to the date the business of the Partnership is continued), to
purchase the Combined Interest for such fair market value of
such Combined Interest of the Departing Partner. In either
event, the Departing Partner shall be entitled to receive all
reimbursements due such Departing Partner pursuant to
Section 7.4, including any employee-related liabilities
(including severance liabilities), incurred in connection with
the termination of any employees employed by the Departing
Partner for the benefit of the Partnership or the other Group
Members.
For purposes of this Section 11.3(a), the fair market value
of the Departing Partners Combined Interest shall be
determined by agreement between the Departing Partner and its
successor or, failing agreement within 30 days after the
effective date of such Departing Partners departure, by an
independent investment banking firm or other independent expert
selected by the Departing Partner and its successor, which, in
turn, may rely on other experts, and the determination of which
shall be conclusive as to such matter. If such parties cannot
agree upon one independent investment banking firm or other
independent expert within 45 days after the effective date
of such departure, then the Departing Partner shall designate an
independent investment banking firm or other independent expert,
the Departing Partners successor shall designate an
independent investment banking firm or other independent expert,
and such firms or experts shall mutually select a third
independent investment banking firm or independent expert, which
third independent investment banking firm or other independent
expert shall determine the fair market value of the Combined
Interest of the Departing Partner. In making its determination,
such third independent investment banking firm or other
independent expert may consider the then current trading price
of Units on any National Securities Exchange on which Units are
then listed, the value of the Partnerships assets, the
rights and obligations of the Departing Partner and other
factors it may deem relevant.
(b) If the Combined Interest is not purchased in the manner
set forth in Section 11.3(a), the Departing Partner (or its
transferee) shall become a Limited Partner and its Combined
Interest shall be converted into Common Units pursuant to a
valuation made by an investment banking firm or other
independent expert selected pursuant to Section 11.3(a),
without reduction in such Partnership Interest (but subject
to proportionate dilution by reason of the admission of its
successor). Any successor General Partner shall indemnify the
Departing Partner (or its transferee) as to all debts and
liabilities of the Partnership arising on or after the date on
which the Departing Partner (or its transferee) becomes a
Limited Partner. For purposes of this Agreement, conversion of
the Combined Interest of the Departing Partner to Common Units
will be characterized as if the Departing Partner (or its
transferee) contributed its Combined Interest to the Partnership
in exchange for the newly issued Common Units.
(c) If a successor General Partner is elected in accordance
with the terms of Section 11.1 or 11.2 (or if the business
of the Partnership is continued pursuant to Section 12.2
and the successor General Partner is not the former General
Partner) and the option described in Section 11.3(a) is not
exercised by the party entitled to do so, the successor General
Partner shall, at the effective date of its admission to the
Partnership, contribute to the Partnership cash in the amount
equal to 2/98ths of the Net Agreed Value of the
Partnerships assets on such date. In such event, such
successor General Partner shall, subject to the following
sentence, be entitled to 2% of all Partnership allocations and
distributions to which the Departing Partner was entitled. In
addition, the successor General Partner shall cause this
Agreement to be amended to reflect that, from and after the date
of such successor General Partners admission, the
successor General Partners interest in all Partnership
distributions and allocations shall be 2%.
Section
11.4 Termination of
Subordination Period, Conversion of Subordinated Units and
Extinguishment of Cumulative Common Unit Arrearages.
Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, if the General
Partner is removed as general partner of the Partnership under
circumstances where Cause does not exist and Units held by the
General Partner and its Affiliates are not voted in favor of
such removal, (i) the Subordination Period will end and all
Outstanding Subordinated Units will immediately and
automatically convert into Common Units on a
A-56
one-for-one basis, (ii) all Cumulative Common Unit
Arrearages on the Common Units will be extinguished and
(iii) the General Partner will have the right to convert
its General Partner Interest and its Incentive Distribution
Rights into Common Units or to receive cash in exchange therefor.
Section
11.5 Withdrawal of Limited
Partners.
No Limited Partner shall have any right to withdraw from the
Partnership; provided, however, that when a transferee of
a Limited Partners Limited Partner Interest becomes a
Record Holder of the Limited Partner Interest so transferred,
such transferring Limited Partner shall cease to be a Limited
Partner with respect to the Limited Partner Interest so
transferred.
ARTICLE XII
Dissolution and Liquidation
Section
12.1 Dissolution.
The Partnership shall not be dissolved by the admission of
Substituted Limited Partners or Additional Limited Partners or
by the admission of a successor General Partner in accordance
with the terms of this Agreement. Upon the removal or withdrawal
of the General Partner, if a successor General Partner is
elected pursuant to Sections 11.1 or 11.2, the Partnership
shall not be dissolved and such successor General Partner shall
continue the business of the Partnership. The Partnership shall
dissolve, and (subject to Section 12.2) its affairs shall
be wound up, upon:
|
|
|
(a) an election to dissolve the Partnership by the General
Partner that is approved by the holders of a Unit Majority; |
|
|
(b) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets and
properties of the Partnership Group; |
|
|
(c) the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of the
Partnership pursuant to the provisions of the Marshall Islands
Act; or |
|
|
(d) an Event of Withdrawal of the General Partner as
provided in Section 11.1(a) (other than
Section 11.1(a)(ii)), unless a successor is elected and an
Opinion of Counsel is received as provided in
Sections 11.1(b) or 11.2 and such successor is admitted to
the Partnership pursuant to Section 10.3. |
Section
12.2 Continuation of the
Business of the Partnership After Dissolution.
Upon (a) dissolution of the Partnership following an Event
of Withdrawal caused by the withdrawal or removal of the General
Partner as provided in Sections 11.1(a)(i) or
(iii) and the failure of the Partners to select a successor
to such Departing Partner pursuant to Sections 11.1 or
11.2, then within 90 days thereafter, or
(b) dissolution of the Partnership upon an event
constituting an Event of Withdrawal as defined in
Sections 11.1(a)(iv) or (v), then, to the maximum extent
permitted by law, within 180 days thereafter, the holders
of a Unit Majority may elect to continue the business of the
Partnership on the same terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement by appointing as a successor General Partner a Person
approved by the holders of a Unit Majority. Unless such an
election is made within the applicable time period as set forth
above, the Partnership shall conduct only activities necessary
to wind up its affairs. If such an election is so made, then:
|
|
|
(i) the Partnership shall continue without dissolution
unless earlier dissolved in accordance with this
Article XII; |
|
|
(ii) if the successor General Partner is not the former
General Partner, then the interest of the former General Partner
shall be treated in the manner provided in
Section 11.3; and |
|
|
(iii) the successor General Partner shall be admitted to
the Partnership as General Partner, effective as of the Event of
Withdrawal, by agreeing in writing to be bound by this
Agreement; provided, that the right of the holders of a
Unit Majority to approve a successor General Partner and |
A-57
|
|
|
to reconstitute and to continue the business of the Partnership
shall not exist and may not be exercised unless the Partnership
has received an Opinion of Counsel that (x) the exercise of
the right would not result in the loss of limited liability of
any Limited Partner and (y) neither the Partnership, the
reconstituted limited partnership nor any Group Member would be
treated as an association taxable as a corporation or otherwise
be taxable as an entity for United States federal income tax
purposes upon the exercise of such right to continue (to the
extent not already so treated or taxed). |
Section
12.3 Liquidator.
Upon dissolution of the Partnership, unless the business of the
Partnership is continued pursuant to Section 12.2, the
General Partner shall select one or more Persons to act as
Liquidator. The Liquidator (if other than the General Partner)
shall be entitled to receive such compensation for its services
as may be approved by holders of at least a majority of the
Outstanding Common Units and Subordinated Units voting as a
single class. The Liquidator (if other than the General Partner)
shall agree not to resign at any time without 15 days
prior notice and may be removed at any time, with or without
cause, by notice of removal approved by holders of at least a
majority of the Outstanding Common Units and Subordinated Units
voting as a single class. Upon dissolution, removal or
resignation of the Liquidator, a successor and substitute
Liquidator (who shall have and succeed to all rights, powers and
duties of the original Liquidator) shall within 30 days
thereafter be approved by holders of at least a majority of the
Outstanding Common Units and Subordinated Units voting as a
single class. The right to approve a successor or substitute
Liquidator in the manner provided herein shall be deemed to
refer also to any such successor or substitute Liquidator
approved in the manner herein provided. Except as expressly
provided in this Article XII, the Liquidator approved in
the manner provided herein shall have and may exercise, without
further authorization or consent of any of the parties hereto,
all of the powers conferred upon the General Partner under the
terms of this Agreement (but subject to all of the applicable
limitations, contractual and otherwise, upon the exercise of
such powers, other than the limitation on sale set forth in
Section 7.3(b)) necessary or appropriate to carry out the
duties and functions of the Liquidator hereunder for and during
the period of time required to complete the winding up and
liquidation of the Partnership as provided for herein.
Section
12.4 Liquidation.
The Liquidator shall proceed to dispose of the assets of the
Partnership, discharge its liabilities, and otherwise wind up
its affairs in such manner and over such period as determined by
the Liquidator, subject to Section 60 of the Marshall
Islands Act and the following:
|
|
|
(a) The assets may be disposed of by public or private sale
or by distribution in kind to one or more Partners on such terms
as the Liquidator and such Partner or Partners may agree. If any
property is distributed in kind, the Partner receiving the
property shall be deemed for purposes of Section 12.4(c) to
have received cash equal to its fair market value; and
contemporaneously therewith, appropriate cash distributions must
be made to the other Partners. The Liquidator may defer
liquidation or distribution of the Partnerships assets for
a reasonable time if it determines that an immediate sale or
distribution of all or some of the Partnerships assets
would be impractical or would cause undue loss to the Partners.
The Liquidator may distribute the Partnerships assets, in
whole or in part, in kind if it determines that a sale would be
impractical or would cause undue loss to the Partners. |
|
|
(b) Liabilities of the Partnership include amounts owed to
the Liquidator as compensation for serving in such capacity
(subject to the terms of Section 12.3) and amounts to
Partners otherwise than in respect of their distribution rights
under Article VI. With respect to any liability that is
contingent, conditional or unmatured or is otherwise not yet due
and payable, the Liquidator shall either settle such claim for
such amount as it thinks appropriate or establish a reserve of
cash or other assets to provide for its payment. When paid, any
unused portion of the reserve shall be distributed as additional
liquidation proceeds. |
A-58
|
|
|
(c) All property and all cash in excess of that required to
discharge liabilities as provided in Section 12.4(b) shall
be distributed to the Partners in accordance with, and to the
extent of, the positive balances in their respective Capital
Accounts, as determined after taking into account all Capital
Account adjustments (other than those made by reason of
distributions pursuant to this Section 12.4(c)) for the
taxable year of the Partnership during which the liquidation of
the Partnership occurs (with such date of occurrence being
determined pursuant to Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(g)), and such
distribution shall be made by the end of such taxable year (or,
if later, within 90 days after said date of such
occurrence). |
Section 12.5 Cancellation
of Certificate of Limited Partnership.
Upon the completion of the distribution of Partnership cash and
property as provided in Section 12.4 in connection with the
liquidation of the Partnership, the Certificate of Limited
Partnership and all qualifications of the Partnership as a
foreign limited partnership in jurisdictions other than the
Marshall Islands shall be canceled and such other actions as may
be necessary to terminate the Partnership shall be taken.
Section 12.6 Return
of Contributions.
The General Partner shall not be personally liable for, and
shall have no obligation to contribute or loan any monies or
property to the Partnership to enable it to effectuate, the
return of the Capital Contributions of the Limited Partners or
Unitholders, or any portion thereof, it being expressly
understood that any such return shall be made solely from
Partnership assets.
Section 12.7 Waiver
of Partition.
To the maximum extent permitted by law, each Partner hereby
waives any right to partition of the Partnership property.
Section 12.8 Capital
Account Restoration.
No Limited Partner shall have any obligation to restore any
negative balance in its Capital Account upon liquidation of the
Partnership. The General Partner shall be obligated to restore
any negative balance in its Capital Account upon liquidation of
its interest in the Partnership by the end of the taxable year
of the Partnership during which such liquidation occurs, or, if
later, within 90 days after the date of such liquidation.
ARTICLE XIII
Amendment of Partnership
Agreement; Meetings; Record Date
Section 13.1 Amendments
to be Adopted Solely by the General Partner.
Each Partner agrees that the General Partner, without the
approval of any Partner or Assignee, may amend any provision of
this Agreement and execute, swear to, acknowledge, deliver, file
and record whatever documents may be required in connection
therewith, to reflect:
|
|
|
(a) a change in the name of the Partnership, the location
of the principal place of business of the Partnership, the
registered agent of the Partnership or the registered office of
the Partnership; |
|
|
(b) admission, substitution, withdrawal or removal of
Partners in accordance with this Agreement; |
|
|
(c) a change that the General Partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate to qualify or continue the
qualification of the Partnership as a limited partnership or a
partnership in which the Limited Partners have limited liability
under the laws of the Marshall Islands or to ensure that the
Group Members will not be treated as associations taxable as
corporations or otherwise taxed as entities for Marshall Islands
income tax purposes; |
A-59
|
|
|
(d) a change that the General Partner determines,
(i) does not adversely affect the Limited Partners
(including any particular class of Partnership Interests as
compared to other classes of Partnership Interests) in any
material respect, (ii) to be necessary or appropriate to
(A) satisfy any requirements, conditions or guidelines
contained in any opinion, directive, order, ruling or regulation
of any Marshall Islands authority (including the Marshall
Islands Act) or (B) facilitate the trading of the Units
(including the division of any class or classes of Outstanding
Units into different classes to facilitate uniformity of tax
consequences within such classes of Units) or comply with any
rule, regulation, guideline or requirement of any National
Securities Exchange on which the Units are or will be listed,
(iii) to be necessary or appropriate in connection with
action taken by the General Partner pursuant to
Section 5.10 or (iv) is required to effect the intent
expressed in the Registration Statement or the intent of the
provisions of this Agreement or is otherwise contemplated by
this Agreement; |
|
|
(e) a change in the fiscal year or taxable year of the
Partnership and any other changes that the General Partner
determines to be necessary or appropriate as a result of a
change in the fiscal year or taxable year of the Partnership
including, if the General Partner shall so determine, a change
in the definition of Quarter and the dates on which
distributions are to be made by the Partnership; |
|
|
(f) an amendment that is necessary, in the Opinion of
Counsel, to prevent the Partnership, or the General Partner or
its directors, officers, trustees or agents from in any manner
being subjected to the provisions of the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended, or plan asset regulations adopted under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended,
regardless of whether such are substantially similar to plan
asset regulations currently applied or proposed by the United
States Department of Labor; |
|
|
(g) An amendment that the General Partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate in connection with the authorization of
issuance of any class or series of Partnership Securities
pursuant to Section 5.6; |
|
|
(h) any amendment expressly permitted in this Agreement to
be made by the General Partner acting alone; |
|
|
(i) an amendment that the General Partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate to reflect and account for the
formation by the Partnership of, or investment by the
Partnership in, any corporation, partnership, joint venture,
limited liability company or other entity, in connection with
the conduct by the Partnership of activities permitted by the
terms of Section 2.4; or |
|
|
(j) any other amendments substantially similar to the
foregoing. |
Section 13.2 Amendment
Procedures.
Except as provided in Sections 13.1 and 13.3, all
amendments to this Agreement shall be made in accordance with
the following requirements. Amendments to this Agreement may be
proposed only by the General Partner; provided, however,
that the General Partner shall have no duty or obligation to
propose any amendment to this Agreement and may decline to do so
free of any fiduciary duty or obligation whatsoever to the
Partnership, any Limited Partner or Assignee and, in declining
to propose an amendment, shall not be required to act in good
faith or pursuant to any other standard imposed by this
Agreement, any Group Member Agreement, any other agreement
contemplated hereby or under the Marshall Islands Act or any
other law, rule or regulation. A proposed amendment shall be
effective upon its approval by the holders of a Unit Majority,
unless a greater or different percentage is required under this
Agreement or by the Marshall Islands Act. Each proposed
amendment that requires the approval of the holders of a
specified percentage of Outstanding Units shall be set forth in
a writing that contains the text of the proposed amendment. If
such an amendment is proposed, the General Partner shall seek
the written approval of the requisite percentage of Outstanding
Units or call a meeting of the Unitholders to consider and vote
on such proposed amendment. The General Partner shall notify all
Record Holders upon final adoption of any such proposed
amendments.
A-60
Section 13.3 Amendment
Requirements.
(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 13.1
and 13.2, no provision of this Agreement that establishes a
percentage of Outstanding Units (including Units deemed owned by
the General Partner) required to take any action shall be
amended, altered, changed, repealed or rescinded in any respect
that would have the effect of reducing such voting percentage
unless such amendment is approved by the written consent or the
affirmative vote of holders of Outstanding Units whose aggregate
Outstanding Units constitute not less than the voting
requirement sought to be reduced.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 13.1
and 13.2, no amendment to this Agreement may (i) enlarge
the obligations of any Limited Partner without its consent,
unless such shall be deemed to have occurred as a result of an
amendment approved pursuant to Section 13.3(c),
(ii) enlarge the obligations of, restrict in any way any
action by or rights of, or reduce in any way the amounts
distributable, reimbursable or otherwise payable to, the General
Partner or any of its Affiliates without its consent, which
consent may be given or withheld at its option,
(iii) change Section 12.1(a), or (iv) change the
term of the Partnership or, except as set forth in
Section 12.1(a), give any Person the right to dissolve the
Partnership.
(c) Except as provided in Section 14.3, and without
limitation of the General Partners authority to adopt
amendments to this Agreement without the approval of any
Partners or Assignees as contemplated in Section 13.1 and
except as otherwise provided in Section 14.3(b), any
amendment that would have a material adverse effect on the
rights or preferences of any class of Partnership Interests
in relation to other classes of Partnership Interests must
be approved by the holders of not less than a majority of the
Outstanding Partnership Interests of the class affected.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
except for amendments pursuant to Section 13.1, no
amendments shall become effective without the approval of the
holders of at least 90% of the Outstanding Units voting as a
single class unless the Partnership obtains an Opinion of
Counsel to the effect that such amendment will not affect the
limited liability of any Limited Partner under applicable law.
(e) Except as provided in Section 13.1, this
Section 13.3 shall only be amended with the approval of the
holders of at least 90% of the Outstanding Units.
Section 13.4 Special
Meetings.
All acts of Limited Partners to be taken pursuant to this
Agreement shall be taken in the manner provided in this
Article XIII. Special meetings of the Limited Partners may
be called by the General Partner or by Limited Partners owning
20% or more of the Outstanding Units of the class or classes for
which a meeting is proposed. Limited Partners shall call a
special meeting by delivering to the General Partner one or more
requests in writing stating that the signing Limited Partners
wish to call a special meeting and indicating the general or
specific purposes for which the special meeting is to be called.
Within 60 days after receipt of such a call from Limited
Partners or within such greater time as may be reasonably
necessary for the Partnership to comply with any statutes,
rules, regulations, listing agreements or similar requirements
governing the holding of a meeting or the solicitation of
proxies for use at such a meeting, the General Partner shall
send a notice of the meeting to the Limited Partners either
directly or indirectly through the Transfer Agent. A meeting
shall be held at a time and place determined by the General
Partner on a date not less than 10 days nor more than
60 days after the mailing of notice of the meeting. Limited
Partners shall not vote on matters that would cause the Limited
Partners to be deemed to be taking part in the management and
control of the business and affairs of the Partnership so as to
jeopardize the Limited Partners limited liability under
the Marshall Islands Act or the law of any other state in which
the Partnership is qualified to do business.
Section 13.5 Notice
of a Meeting.
Notice of a meeting called pursuant to Section 13.4 shall
be given to the Record Holders of the class or classes of Units
for which a meeting is proposed in writing by mail or other
means of written
A-61
communication in accordance with Section 16.1. The notice
shall be deemed to have been given at the time when deposited in
the mail or sent by other means of written communication.
Section 13.6 Record
Date.
For purposes of determining the Limited Partners entitled to
notice of or to vote at a meeting of the Limited Partners or to
give approvals without a meeting as provided in
Section 13.11 the General Partner may set a Record Date,
which shall not be less than 10 nor more than 60 days
before (a) the date of the meeting (unless such requirement
conflicts with any rule, regulation, guideline or requirement of
any National Securities Exchange on which the Units are listed
for trading, in which case the rule, regulation, guideline or
requirement of such exchange shall govern) or (b) in the
event that approvals are sought without a meeting, the date by
which Limited Partners are requested in writing by the General
Partner to give such approvals.
Section 13.7 Adjournment.
When a meeting is adjourned to another time or place, notice
need not be given of the adjourned meeting and a new Record Date
need not be fixed, if the time and place thereof are announced
at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken, unless such
adjournment shall be for more than 45 days. At the
adjourned meeting, the Partnership may transact any business
which might have been transacted at the original meeting. If the
adjournment is for more than 45 days or if a new Record
Date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the
adjourned meeting shall be given in accordance with this
Article XIII.
Section 13.8 Waiver
of Notice; Approval of Meeting; Approval of Minutes.
The transactions of any meeting of Limited Partners, however
called and noticed, and whenever held, shall be as valid as if
it had occurred at a meeting duly held after regular call and
notice, if a quorum is present either in person or by proxy, and
if, either before or after the meeting, Limited Partners
representing such quorum who were present in person or by proxy
and entitled to vote, sign a written waiver of notice or an
approval of the holding of the meeting or an approval of the
minutes thereof. All waivers and approvals shall be filed with
the Partnership records or made a part of the minutes of the
meeting. Attendance of a Limited Partner at a meeting shall
constitute a waiver of notice of the meeting, except when the
Limited Partner attends the meeting for the express purpose of
objecting, at the beginning of the meeting, to the transaction
of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or
convened; and except that attendance at a meeting is not a
waiver of any right to disapprove the consideration of matters
required to be included in the notice of the meeting, but not so
included, if the disapproval is expressly made at the meeting.
Section 13.9 Quorum
and Voting.
The holders of a majority of the Outstanding Units of the class
or classes for which a meeting has been called (including
Outstanding Units deemed owned by the General Partner)
represented in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum at a
meeting of Limited Partners of such class or classes unless any
such action by the Limited Partners requires approval by holders
of a greater percentage of such Units, in which case the quorum
shall be such greater percentage. At any meeting of the Limited
Partners duly called and held in accordance with this Agreement
at which a quorum is present, the act of Limited Partners
holding Outstanding Units that in the aggregate represent a
majority of the Outstanding Units entitled to vote and be
present in person or by proxy at such meeting shall be deemed to
constitute the act of all Limited Partners, unless a greater or
different percentage is required with respect to such action
under the provisions of this Agreement, in which case the act of
the Limited Partners holding Outstanding Units that in the
aggregate represent at least such greater or different
percentage shall be required. The Limited Partners present at a
duly called or held meeting at which a quorum is present may
continue to transact business until adjournment, notwithstanding
the withdrawal of enough Limited Partners to leave less than a
quorum, if any action taken (other than adjournment) is approved
by the required percentage of Outstanding Units specified in
this Agreement (including Outstanding Units deemed owned by the
General Partner). In the absence of a quorum any meeting of
Limited Partners may be adjourned from time to time by the
affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the
Outstanding Units entitled to
A-62
vote at such meeting (including Outstanding Units deemed owned
by the General Partner) represented either in person or by
proxy, but no other business may be transacted, except as
provided in Section 13.7.
Section 13.10 Conduct
of a Meeting.
The General Partner shall have full power and authority
concerning the manner of conducting any meeting of the Limited
Partners or solicitation of approvals in writing, including the
determination of Persons entitled to vote, the existence of a
quorum, the satisfaction of the requirements of
Section 13.4, the conduct of voting, the validity and
effect of any proxies and the determination of any
controversies, votes or challenges arising in connection with or
during the meeting or voting. The General Partner shall
designate a Person to serve as chairman of any meeting and shall
further designate a Person to take the minutes of any meeting.
All minutes shall be kept with the records of the Partnership
maintained by the General Partner. The General Partner may make
such other regulations consistent with applicable law and this
Agreement as it may deem advisable concerning the conduct of any
meeting of the Limited Partners or solicitation of approvals in
writing, including regulations in regard to the appointment of
proxies, the appointment and duties of inspectors of votes and
approvals, the submission and examination of proxies and other
evidence of the right to vote, and the revocation of approvals
in writing.
Section 13.11 Action
Without a Meeting.
If authorized by the General Partner, any action that may be
taken at a meeting of the Limited Partners may be taken without
a meeting if an approval in writing setting forth the action so
taken is signed by Limited Partners owning not less than the
minimum percentage of the Outstanding Units (including Units
deemed owned by the General Partner) that would be necessary to
authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all the
Limited Partners were present and voted (unless such provision
conflicts with any rule, regulation, guideline or requirement of
any National Securities Exchange on which the Units are listed,
in which case the rule, regulation, guideline or requirement of
such exchange shall govern). Prompt notice of the taking of
action without a meeting shall be given to the Limited Partners
who have not approved in writing. The General Partner may
specify that any written ballot submitted to Limited Partners
for the purpose of taking any action without a meeting shall be
returned to the Partnership within the time period, which shall
be not less than 20 days, specified by the General Partner.
If a ballot returned to the Partnership does not vote all of the
Units held by the Limited Partners, the Partnership shall be
deemed to have failed to receive a ballot for the Units that
were not voted. If approval of the taking of any action by the
Limited Partners is solicited by any Person other than by or on
behalf of the General Partner, the written approvals shall have
no force and effect unless and until (a) they are deposited
with the Partnership in care of the General Partner,
(b) approvals sufficient to take the action proposed are
dated as of a date not more than 90 days prior to the date
sufficient approvals are deposited with the Partnership and
(c) an Opinion of Counsel is delivered to the General
Partner to the effect that the exercise of such right and the
action proposed to be taken with respect to any particular
matter (i) will not cause the Limited Partners to be deemed
to be taking part in the management and control of the business
and affairs of the Partnership so as to jeopardize the Limited
Partners limited liability, and (ii) is otherwise
permissible under the state statutes then governing the rights,
duties and liabilities of the Partnership and the Partners.
Section 13.12 Right
to Vote and Related Matters.
(a) Only those Record Holders of the Units on the Record
Date set pursuant to Section 13.6 (and also subject to the
limitations contained in the definition of
Outstanding) shall be entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, a meeting of Limited Partners or to act with respect to
matters as to which the holders of the Outstanding Units have
the right to vote or to act. All references in this Agreement to
votes of, or other acts that may be taken by, the Outstanding
Units shall be deemed to be references to the votes or acts of
the Record Holders of such Outstanding Units.
(b) With respect to Units that are held for a Persons
account by another Person (such as a broker, dealer, bank, trust
company or clearing corporation, or an agent of any of the
foregoing), in whose name such Units are registered, such other
Person shall, in exercising the voting rights in respect of such
Units
A-63
on any matter, and unless the arrangement between such Persons
provides otherwise, vote such Units in favor of, and at the
direction of, the Person who is the beneficial owner, and the
Partnership shall be entitled to assume it is so acting without
further inquiry. The provisions of this Section 13.12(b)
(as well as all other provisions of this Agreement) are subject
to the provisions of Section 4.3.
ARTICLE XIV
MERGER
Section 14.1 Authority.
The Partnership may merge or consolidate with or into one or
more corporations, limited liability companies, statutory trusts
or associations, real estate investment trusts, common law
trusts or unincorporated businesses, including a partnership
(whether general or limited (including a limited liability
partnership)), formed under the laws of the Marshall Islands,
pursuant to a written agreement of merger or consolidation
(Merger Agreement) in accordance with this
Article XIV.
Section 14.2 Procedure
for Merger or Consolidation.
Merger or consolidation of the Partnership pursuant to this
Article XIV requires the prior consent of the General
Partner, provided, however, that, to the fullest extent
permitted by law, the General Partner shall have no duty or
obligation to consent to any merger or consolidation of the
Partnership and may decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty
or obligation whatsoever to the Partnership, any Limited Partner
and, in declining to consent to a merger or consolidation, shall
not be required to act in good faith or pursuant to any other
standard imposed by this Agreement, any Group Member Agreement,
any other agreement contemplated hereby or under the Marshall
Islands Act or any other law, rule or regulation or at equity.
If the General Partner shall determine to consent to the merger
or consolidation, the General Partner shall approve the Merger
Agreement, which shall set forth:
(a) the names and jurisdictions of formation or
organization of each of the business entities proposing to merge
or consolidate;
(b) the name and jurisdiction of formation or organization
of the business entity that is to survive the proposed merger or
consolidation (the Surviving Business Entity);
(c) the terms and conditions of the proposed merger or
consolidation;
(d) the manner and basis of exchanging or converting the
equity securities of each constituent business entity for, or
into, cash, property or interests, rights, securities or
obligations of the Surviving Business Entity; and (i) if
any general or limited partner interests, securities or rights
of any constituent business entity are not to be exchanged or
converted solely for, or into, cash, property or interests,
rights, securities or obligations of the Surviving Business
Entity, the cash, property or general or limited partner
interests, rights, securities or obligations of any general or
limited partnership, corporation, trust, limited liability
company, unincorporated business or other entity (other than the
Surviving Business Entity) which the holders of such interests,
securities or rights are to receive in exchange for, or upon
conversion of their interests, securities or rights, and
(ii) in the case of securities represented by certificates,
upon the surrender of such certificates, which cash, property or
interests, rights, securities or obligations of the Surviving
Business Entity or any general or limited partnership,
corporation, trust, limited liability company, unincorporated
business or other entity (other than the Surviving Business
Entity), or evidences thereof, are to be delivered;
(e) a statement of any changes in the constituent documents
or the adoption of new constituent documents (the articles or
certificate of incorporation, articles of trust, declaration of
trust, certificate or agreement of limited partnership or other
similar charter or governing document) of the Surviving Business
Entity to be effected by such merger or consolidation;
(f) the effective time of the merger, which may be the date
of the filing of the certificate of merger pursuant to
Section 14.4 or a later date specified in or determinable
in accordance with the Merger
A-64
Agreement (provided, that if the effective time of the merger is
to be later than the date of the filing of such certificate of
merger, the effective time shall be fixed at a date or time
certain at or prior to the time of the filing of such
certificate of merger and stated therein); and
(g) such other provisions with respect to the proposed
merger or consolidation that the General Partner determines to
be necessary or appropriate.
Section 14.3 Approval
by Limited Partners of Merger or Consolidation.
(a) Except as provided in Sections 14.3(d) and
14.3(e), the General Partner, upon its approval of the Merger
Agreement, shall direct that the Merger Agreement be submitted
to a vote of Limited Partners, whether at a special meeting or
by written consent, in either case in accordance with the
requirements of Article XIII. A copy or a summary of the
Merger Agreement shall be included in or enclosed with the
notice of a special meeting or the written consent.
(b) Except as provided in Sections 14.3(d) and
14.3(e), the Merger Agreement shall be approved upon receiving
the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of a Unit
Majority.
(c) Except as provided in Sections 14.3(d) and
14.3(e), after such approval by vote or consent of the Limited
Partners, and at any time prior to the filing of the certificate
of merger pursuant to Section 14.4, the merger or
consolidation may be abandoned pursuant to provisions therefor,
if any, set forth in the Merger Agreement.
(d) Notwithstanding anything else contained in this
Article XIV or in this Agreement, the General Partner is
permitted, without Limited Partner approval, to convert the
Partnership or any Group Member into a new limited liability
entity, to merge the Partnership or any Group Member into, or
convey all of the Partnerships assets to, another limited
liability entity which shall be newly formed and shall have no
assets, liabilities or operations at the time of such
conversion, merger or conveyance other than those it receives
from the Partnership or other Group Member if (i) the
General Partner has received an Opinion of Counsel that the
conversion, merger or conveyance, as the case may be, would not
result in the loss of the limited liability of any Limited
Partner or cause the Partnership to be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation or otherwise to be taxed as an entity
for federal income tax purposes (to the extent not previously
treated as such), (ii) the sole purpose of such conversion,
merger or conveyance is to effect a mere change in the legal
form of the Partnership into another limited liability entity
and (iii) the governing instruments of the new entity
provide the Limited Partners and the General Partner with the
same rights and obligations as are herein contained.
(e) Additionally, notwithstanding anything else contained
in this Article XIV or in this Agreement, the General
Partner is permitted, without Limited Partner approval, to merge
or consolidate the Partnership with or into another entity if
(i) the General Partner has received an Opinion of Counsel
that the merger or consolidation, as the case may be, would not
result in the loss of the limited liability of any Limited
Partner or cause the Partnership to be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation or otherwise to be taxed as an entity
for federal income tax purposes (to the extent not previously
treated as such), (ii) the merger or consolidation would
not result in an amendment to the Partnership Agreement, other
than any amendments that could be adopted pursuant to
Section 13.1, (iii) the Partnership is the Surviving
Business Entity in such merger or consolidation, (iv) each
Unit outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the
merger or consolidation is to be an identical Unit of the
Partnership after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, and (v) the number of Partnership Securities
to be issued by the Partnership in such merger or consolidation
does not exceed 20% of the Partnership Securities Outstanding
immediately prior to the effective date of such merger or
consolidation.
Section 14.4 Certificate
of Merger.
Upon the required approval by the General Partner and the
Unitholders of a Merger Agreement, a certificate of merger shall
be executed and filed in conformity with the requirements of the
Marshall Islands Act.
A-65
Section 14.5 Amendment
of Partnership Agreement.
Pursuant to Section 20(2) of the Marshall Islands Act, an
agreement of merger or consolidation approved in accordance with
Section 20(2) of the Marshall Islands Act may
(a) effect any amendment to this Agreement or
(b) effect the adoption of a new partnership agreement for
a limited partnership if it is the Surviving Business Entity.
Any such amendment or adoption made pursuant to this
Section 14.5 shall be effective at the effective time or
date of the merger or consolidation.
Section 14.6 Effect
of Merger.
(a) At the effective time of the certificate of merger:
|
|
|
(i) all of the rights, privileges and powers of each of the
business entities that has merged or consolidated, and all
property, real, personal and mixed, and all debts due to any of
those business entities and all other things and causes of
action belonging to each of those business entities, shall be
vested in the Surviving Business Entity and after the merger or
consolidation shall be the property of the Surviving Business
Entity to the extent they were of each constituent business
entity; |
|
|
(ii) the title to any real property vested by deed or
otherwise in any of those constituent business entities shall
not revert and is not in any way impaired because of the merger
or consolidation; |
|
|
(iii) all rights of creditors and all liens on or security
interests in property of any of those constituent business
entities shall be preserved unimpaired; and |
|
|
(iv) all debts, liabilities and duties of those constituent
business entities shall attach to the Surviving Business Entity
and may be enforced against it to the same extent as if the
debts, liabilities and duties had been incurred or contracted
by it. |
(b) A merger or consolidation effected pursuant to this
Article shall not be deemed to result in a transfer or
assignment of assets or liabilities from one entity to another.
ARTICLE XV
Right to Acquire Limited
Partner Interests
Section 15.1 Right
to Acquire Limited Partner Interests.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
if at any time the General Partner and its Affiliates hold more
than 80% of the total Limited Partner Interests of any class
then Outstanding, the General Partner shall then have the right,
which right it may assign and transfer in whole or in part to
the Partnership or any Affiliate of the General Partner,
exercisable at its option, to purchase all, but not less than
all, of such Limited Partner Interests of such class then
Outstanding held by Persons other than the General Partner and
its Affiliates, at the greater of (x) the Current Market
Price as of the date three days prior to the date that the
notice described in Section 15.1(b) is mailed and
(y) the highest price paid by the General Partner or any of
its Affiliates for any such Limited Partner Interest of such
class purchased during the 90-day period preceding the date that
the notice described in Section 15.1(b) is mailed. As used
in this Agreement, (i) Current Market Price as
of any date of any class of Limited Partner Interests means the
average of the daily Closing Prices (as hereinafter defined) per
Limited Partner Interest of such class for the 20 consecutive
Trading Days (as hereinafter defined) immediately prior to such
date; (ii) Closing Price for any day means the
last sale price on such day, regular way, or in case no such
sale takes place on such day, the average of the closing bid and
asked prices on such day, regular way, as reported in the
principal consolidated transaction reporting system with respect
to securities listed on the principal National Securities
Exchange (other than the Nasdaq Stock Market) on which such
Limited Partner Interests are listed or, if such Limited Partner
Interests of such class are not listed on any National
Securities Exchange (other than the Nasdaq Stock Market), the
last quoted price on such day or, if not so quoted, the average
of the high bid and low asked prices on such day in the
over-the-counter market, as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market
or such other system then in use, or, if on any such day such
Limited Partner Interests of such class are not quoted by any
such organization, the average of the
A-66
closing bid and asked prices on such day as furnished by a
professional market maker making a market in such Limited
Partner Interests of such class selected by the General Partner,
or if on any such day no market maker is making a market in such
Limited Partner Interests of such class, the fair value of such
Limited Partner Interests on such day as determined by the
General Partner; and (iii) Trading Day means a
day on which the principal National Securities Exchange on which
such Limited Partner Interests of any class are listed is open
for the transaction of business or, if Limited Partner Interests
of a class are not listed on any National Securities Exchange, a
day on which banking institutions in New York City generally are
open.
(b) If the General Partner, any Affiliate of the General
Partner or the Partnership elects to exercise the right to
purchase Limited Partner Interests granted pursuant to
Section 15.1(a), the General Partner shall deliver to the
Transfer Agent notice of such election to purchase (the
Notice of Election to Purchase) and shall cause the
Transfer Agent to mail a copy of such Notice of Election to
Purchase to the Record Holders of Limited Partner Interests of
such class (as of a Record Date selected by the General Partner)
at least 10, but not more than 60, days prior to the
Purchase Date. Such Notice of Election to Purchase shall also be
published for a period of at least three consecutive days in at
least two daily newspapers of general circulation printed in the
English language and published in the Borough of Manhattan, New
York. The Notice of Election to Purchase shall specify the
Purchase Date and the price (determined in accordance with
Section 15.1(a)) at which Limited Partner Interests will be
purchased and state that the General Partner, its Affiliate or
the Partnership, as the case may be, elects to purchase such
Limited Partner Interests, upon surrender of Certificates
representing such Limited Partner Interests in exchange for
payment, at such office or offices of the Transfer Agent as the
Transfer Agent may specify, or as may be required by any
National Securities Exchange on which such Limited Partner
Interests are listed. Any such Notice of Election to Purchase
mailed to a Record Holder of Limited Partner Interests at his
address as reflected in the records of the Transfer Agent shall
be conclusively presumed to have been given regardless of
whether the owner receives such notice. On or prior to the
Purchase Date, the General Partner, its Affiliate or the
Partnership, as the case may be, shall deposit with the Transfer
Agent cash in an amount sufficient to pay the aggregate purchase
price of all of such Limited Partner Interests to be purchased
in accordance with this Section 15.1. If the Notice of
Election to Purchase shall have been duly given as aforesaid at
least 10 days prior to the Purchase Date, and if on or
prior to the Purchase Date the deposit described in the
preceding sentence has been made for the benefit of the holders
of Limited Partner Interests subject to purchase as provided
herein, then from and after the Purchase Date, notwithstanding
that any Certificate shall not have been surrendered for
purchase, all rights of the holders of such Limited Partner
Interests (including any rights pursuant to Articles IV, V,
VI, and XII) shall thereupon cease, except the right to receive
the purchase price (determined in accordance with
Section 15.1(a)) for Limited Partner Interests therefor,
without interest, upon surrender to the Transfer Agent of the
Certificates representing such Limited Partner Interests, and
such Limited Partner Interests shall thereupon be deemed to be
transferred to the General Partner, its Affiliate or the
Partnership, as the case may be, on the record books of the
Transfer Agent and the Partnership, and the General Partner or
any Affiliate of the General Partner, or the Partnership, as the
case may be, shall be deemed to be the owner of all such Limited
Partner Interests from and after the Purchase Date and shall
have all rights as the owner of such Limited Partner Interests
(including all rights as owner of such Limited Partner Interests
pursuant to Articles IV, V, VI, and XII).
(c) At any time from and after the Purchase Date, a holder
of an Outstanding Limited Partner Interest subject to purchase
as provided in this Section 15.1 may surrender his
Certificate evidencing such Limited Partner Interest to the
Transfer Agent in exchange for payment of the amount described
in Section 15.1(a), therefor, without interest thereon.
A-67
ARTICLE XVI
General Provisions
Section 16.1 Addresses
and Notices.
Any notice, demand, request, report or proxy materials required
or permitted to be given or made to a Partner or Assignee under
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given or
made when delivered in person or when sent by first
class United States mail or by other means of written
communication to the Partner or Assignee at the address
described below. Any notice, payment or report to be given or
made to a Partner or Assignee hereunder shall be deemed
conclusively to have been given or made, and the obligation to
give such notice or report or to make such payment shall be
deemed conclusively to have been fully satisfied, upon sending
of such notice, payment or report to the Record Holder of such
Partnership Securities at his address as shown on the records of
the Transfer Agent or as otherwise shown on the records of the
Partnership, regardless of any claim of any Person who may have
an interest in such Partnership Securities by reason of any
assignment or otherwise. An affidavit or certificate of making
of any notice, payment or report in accordance with the
provisions of this Section 16.1 executed by the General
Partner, the Transfer Agent or the mailing organization shall be
prima facie evidence of the giving or making of such notice,
payment or report. If any notice, payment or report addressed to
a Record Holder at the address of such Record Holder appearing
on the books and records of the Transfer Agent or the
Partnership is returned by the United States Postal Service
marked to indicate that the United States Postal Service is
unable to deliver it, such notice, payment or report and any
subsequent notices, payments and reports shall be deemed to have
been duly given or made without further mailing (until such time
as such Record Holder or another Person notifies the Transfer
Agent or the Partnership of a change in his address) if they are
available for the Partner or Assignee at the principal office of
the Partnership for a period of one year from the date of the
giving or making of such notice, payment or report to the other
Partners and Assignees. Any notice to the Partnership shall be
deemed given if received by the General Partner at the principal
office of the Partnership designated pursuant to
Section 2.3. The General Partner may rely and shall be
protected in relying on any notice or other document from a
Partner, Assignee or other Person if believed by it to be
genuine.
Section 16.2 Further
Action.
The parties shall execute and deliver all documents, provide all
information and take or refrain from taking action as may be
necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of this
Agreement.
Section 16.3 Binding
Effect.
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the parties hereto and their heirs, executors, administrators,
successors, legal representatives and permitted assigns.
Section 16.4 Integration.
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement among the
parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof and
supersedes all prior agreements and understandings pertaining
thereto.
Section 16.5 Creditors.
None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be for the
benefit of, or shall be enforceable by, any creditor of the
Partnership.
Section 16.6 Waiver.
No failure by any party to insist upon the strict performance of
any covenant, duty, agreement or condition of this Agreement or
to exercise any right or remedy consequent upon a breach thereof
shall constitute waiver of any such breach of any other
covenant, duty, agreement or condition.
A-68
Section 16.7 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all of which
together shall constitute an agreement binding on all the
parties hereto, notwithstanding that all such parties are not
signatories to the original or the same counterpart. Each party
shall become bound by this Agreement immediately upon affixing
its signature hereto or, in the case of a Person acquiring a
Unit, upon accepting the certificate evidencing such Unit or
executing and delivering a Transfer Application as herein
described, independently of the signature of any other party.
Section 16.8 Applicable
Law.
This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and
governed by the laws of the Marshall Islands, without regard to
the principles of conflicts of law.
Section 16.9 Invalidity
of Provisions.
If any provision of this Agreement is or becomes invalid,
illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality
and enforceability of the remaining provisions contained herein
shall not be affected thereby.
Section 16.10 Consent
of Partners.
Each Partner hereby expressly consents and agrees that, whenever
in this Agreement it is specified that an action may be taken
upon the affirmative vote or consent of less than all of the
Partners, such action may be so taken upon the concurrence of
less than all of the Partners and each Partner shall be bound by
the results of such action.
[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
A-69
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as a Deed as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
GENERAL PARTNER: |
|
|
Teekay GP L.L.C. |
|
|
|
ORGANIZATIONAL LIMITED PARTNER: |
|
|
Teekay Shipping Corporation |
A-70
|
|
|
All Limited Partners now and hereafter admitted as Limited
Partners of the Partnership, pursuant to powers of attorney now
and hereafter executed in favor of, and granted and delivered to
the General Partner. |
|
|
Teekay GP L.L.C. |
A-71
EXHIBIT A
to the First Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
Certificate Evidencing Common Units
Representing Limited Partner Interests in
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
|
|
No. __________________ |
__________________ Common Units |
In accordance with Section 4.1 of the First Amended and
Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Teekay LNG Partners
L.P., as amended, supplemented or restated from time to time
(the Partnership Agreement), Teekay LNG
Partners L.P., a Marshall Islands limited partnership (the
Partnership), hereby certifies that
____________________________________ (the
Holder) is the registered owner of Common
Units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership
(the Common Units) transferable on the books
of the Partnership, in person or by duly authorized attorney,
upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed and
accompanied by a properly executed application for transfer of
the Common Units represented by this Certificate. The rights,
preferences and limitations of the Common Units are set forth
in, and this Certificate and the Common Units represented hereby
are issued and shall in all respects be subject to the terms and
provisions of, the Partnership Agreement. Copies of the
Partnership Agreement are on file at, and will be furnished
without charge on delivery of written request to the Partnership
at, the principal office of the Partnership located at TK House,
Bayside Executive Park, West Bay Street and Blake Road, P.O.
Box AP-59212, Nassau, Commonwealth of the Bahamas.
Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the
meanings given them in the Partnership Agreement.
The Holder, by accepting this Certificate, is deemed to have
(i) requested admission as, and agreed to become, a Limited
Partner and to have agreed to comply with and be bound by and to
have executed the Partnership Agreement, (ii) represented
and warranted that the Holder has all right, power and authority
and, if an individual, the capacity necessary to enter into the
Partnership Agreement, (iii) granted the powers of attorney
provided for in the Partnership Agreement and (iv) made the
waivers and given the consents and approvals contained in the
Partnership Agreement.
This Certificate shall not be valid for any purpose unless it
has been countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and
Registrar.
|
|
|
Dated: |
|
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. |
|
Countersigned and Registered by: |
|
By: Teekay GP L.L.C.,
its General Partner |
|
as
Transfer Agent and Registrar |
|
By: Name: |
By: Authorized
Signature |
|
By: Secretary |
A-72
[Reverse of Certificate]
ABBREVIATIONS
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the
face of this Certificate, shall be construed as follows
according to applicable laws or regulations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEN COM
|
|
|
|
as tenants in common |
|
UNIF GIFT/TRANSFERS MIN ACT |
TEN ENT
|
|
|
|
as tenants by the entireties |
|
|
|
Custodian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cust) |
|
|
|
(Minor) |
JT TEN
|
|
|
|
as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants
in common |
|
under Uniform Gifts/Transfers to CD Minors Act (State) |
Additional abbreviations, though not in the above list, may also
be used.
ASSIGNMENT OF COMMON UNITS
in
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ____________________________________ hereby
assigns, conveys, sells and transfers unto
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Please print or typewrite name and address of Assignee) |
|
(Please insert Social Security or other identifying number of
Assignee) |
____________ Common Units representing limited partner
interests evidenced by this Certificate, subject to the
Partnership Agreement, and does hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint _________________________ as its attorney-in-fact
with full power of substitution to transfer the same on the
books of Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
NOTE: |
|
The signature to any endorsement hereon must correspond with the
name as written upon the face of this Certificate in every
particular, without alteration, enlargement or change. |
|
THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C.
RULE 17d-15 |
|
|
|
(Signature)
(Signature) |
No transfer of the Common Units evidenced hereby will be
registered on the books of the Partnership, unless the
Certificate evidencing the Common Units to be transferred is
surrendered for registration or transfer and an Application for
Transfer of Common Units has been executed by a transferee
either (a) on the form set forth below or (b) on a
separate application that the Partnership will furnish on
request without charge. A transferor of the Common Units shall
have no duty to the transferee with respect to execution of the
transfer application in order for such transferee to obtain
registration of the transfer of the Common Units.
A-73
APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF COMMON UNITS
The undersigned (Assignee) hereby applies for
transfer registration to the name of the Assignee of the Common
Units evidenced hereby.
The Assignee (a) requests admission as a Substituted
Limited Partner and agrees to comply with and be bound by, and
hereby executes, the First Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (the
Partnership), as amended, supplemented or
restated to the date hereof (the Partnership
Agreement), and from time to time (b) represents
and warrants that the Assignee has all right, power and
authority and, if an individual, the capacity necessary to enter
into the Partnership Agreement, (c) appoints the General
Partner of the Partnership and, if a Liquidator shall be
appointed, the Liquidator of the Partnership as the
Assignees attorney-in-fact to execute, swear to,
acknowledge and file any document, including, without
limitation, the Partnership Agreement and any amendment thereto
and the Certificate of Registration of the Partnership and any
amendment thereto, necessary or appropriate for the
Assignees admission as a Substituted Limited Partner and
as a party to the Partnership Agreement, (d) gives the
powers of attorney provided for in the Partnership Agreement,
and (e) makes the waivers and gives the consents and
approvals contained in the Partnership Agreement. Capitalized
terms not defined herein have the meanings assigned to such
terms in the Partnership Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social Security or other identifying number |
|
Signature of Assignee: |
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price including commissions, if any |
|
Name and Address of Assignee |
Type of Entity (check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o Individual |
|
o Partnership |
|
o Corporation |
|
|
o Trust |
|
o Other (specify) |
|
|
|
Nationality (for taxation purposes) (check one): |
|
|
o U.S. Citizen,
Resident or Domestic Entity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
o Foreign Corporation |
|
o Non-resident Alien |
|
|
If the U.S. Citizen, Resident or Domestic Entity box is
checked, Certification B-1 must be completed.
Under Section 1445(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code), the Partnership must
withhold tax with respect to certain transfers of property if a
holder of an interest in the Partnership is a foreign person. To
inform the Partnership that no withholding is required with
respect to the undersigned interestholders interest in it,
the undersigned hereby certifies as set forth in B-1 (or, if
applicable, certifies the following on behalf of the
interestholder).
The interestholder understands that this certificate may be
disclosed to the Internal Revenue Service by the Partnership and
that any false statement contained herein could be punishable by
fine, imprisonment or both.
A-74
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this
certification and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is
true, correct and complete and, if applicable, I further declare
that I have authority to sign this document on behalf of:
Name of Interestholder
Signature and Date
Title (if applicable)
Note: If the Assignee is a broker, dealer, bank, trust company,
clearing corporation, other nominee holder or an agent of any of
the foregoing, and is holding for the account of any other
person, this application should be completed by an officer
thereof or, in the case of a broker or dealer, by a registered
representative who is a member of a registered national
securities exchange or a member of the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc., or, in the case of any other nominee
holder, a person performing a similar function. If the Assignee
is a broker, dealer, bank, trust company, clearing corporation,
other nominee owner or an agent of any of the foregoing, the
above certification as to any person for whom the Assignee will
hold the Common Units shall be made to the best of the
Assignees knowledge.
A-75
APPENDIX B
APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF COMMON UNITS
The undersigned (Assignee) hereby applies for
transfer to the name of the Assignee of the Common Units
evidenced hereby.
The Assignee (a) requests admission as a Substituted
Limited Partner and agrees to comply with and be bound by, and
hereby executes, the First Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (the
Partnership), as amended, supplemented or restated
to the date hereof (the Partnership Agreement),
(b) represents and warrants that the Assignee has all
right, power and authority and, if an individual, the capacity
necessary to enter into the Partnership Agreement,
(c) appoints the General Partner of the Partnership and, if
a Liquidator shall be appointed, the Liquidator of the
Partnership as the Assignees attorney-in-fact to execute,
swear to, acknowledge and file any document, including, without
limitation, the Partnership Agreement and any amendment thereto
and the Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Partnership
and any amendment thereto, necessary or appropriate for the
Assignees admission as a Substituted Limited Partner and
as a party to the Partnership Agreement, (d) gives the
powers of attorney provided for in the Partnership Agreement,
and (e) makes the waivers and gives the consents and
approvals contained in the Partnership Agreement. Capitalized
terms not defined herein have the meanings assigned to such
terms in the Partnership Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social Security or other identifying
number of Assignee |
|
Signature of Assignee |
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price including commissions, if any |
|
Name and Address of Assignee |
Type of Entity (check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o Individual |
|
o Partnership |
|
o Corporation |
|
|
o Trust |
|
o Other (specify) |
|
|
|
Nationality (check one): |
|
|
o U.S. citizen, Resident
or Domestic Entity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
o Foreign Corporation |
|
o Non-resident Alien |
|
|
If the U.S. Citizen, Resident or Domestic Entity box is checked,
the following certification must be completed.
Under Section 1445(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code), the Partnership must withhold
tax with respect to certain transfers of property if a holder of
an interest in the Partnership is a foreign person. To inform
the Partnership that no withholding is required with respect to
the undersigned interestholders interest in it, the
undersigned hereby certifies the following (or, if applicable,
certifies the following on behalf of the interestholder).
Complete Either A or B:
|
|
|
A. Individual Interestholder |
|
|
|
1. I am not a non-resident alien for purposes of U.S.
income taxation. |
B-1
|
|
|
2. My U.S. taxpayer identification number (Social Security
Number) is
. |
|
|
3. My home address
is . |
|
|
|
B. Partnership, Corporation or Other Interestholder |
|
|
|
1. is not a foreign corporation, foreign partnership,
foreign trust (Name of Interestholder) or foreign estate (as
those terms are defined in the Code and Treasury Regulations). |
|
|
2. The interestholders U.S. employer identification
number
is . |
|
|
3. The interestholders office address and place of
incorporation (if applicable)
is . |
The interestholder agrees to notify the Partnership within sixty
(60) days of the date the interestholder becomes a foreign
person.
The interestholder understands that this certificate may be
disclosed to the Internal Revenue Service by the Partnership and
that any false statement contained herein could be punishable by
fine, imprisonment or both.
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this
certification and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is
true, correct and complete and, if applicable, I further declare
that I have authority to sign this document on behalf of:
Name of Interestholder
Signature and Date
Title (if applicable)
Note: If the Assignee is a broker, dealer, bank, trust company,
clearing corporation, other nominee holder or an agent of any of
the foregoing, and is holding for the account of any other
person, this application should be completed by an officer
thereof or, in the case of a broker or dealer, by a registered
representative who is a member of a registered national
securities exchange or a member of the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc., or, in the case of any other nominee
holder, a person performing a similar function. If the Assignee
is a broker, dealer, bank, trust company, clearing corporation,
other nominee owner or an agent of any of the foregoing, the
above certification as to any person for whom the Assignee will
hold the Common Units shall be made to the best of the
Assignees knowledge.
B-2
APPENDIX C
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
|
|
|
Adjusted operating surplus: |
|
For any period, operating surplus generated during that period
is adjusted to: |
|
|
|
(a) Decrease operating surplus by: |
|
|
|
(1) any
net increase in working capital borrowings with respect to that
period; and |
|
|
|
(2) any
net reduction in cash reserves for operating expenditures with
respect to that period not relating to an operating expenditure
made with respect to that period; and |
|
|
|
(b) increase operating surplus by: |
|
|
|
(1) any
net decrease in working capital borrowings with respect to that
period; and |
|
|
|
(2) any
net increase in cash reserves for operating expenditures with
respect to that period required by any debt instrument for the
repayment of principal, interest or premium. |
|
|
|
Adjusted operating surplus does not include that portion of
operating surplus included in clauses (a)(1) and (a)(2) of the
definition of operating surplus. |
|
Available cash: |
|
For any quarter ending prior to liquidation: |
|
|
|
(a) the sum of: |
|
|
|
(1) all
cash and cash equivalents of Teekay LNG Partners and its
subsidiaries on hand at the end of that quarter; and |
|
|
|
(2) all
additional cash and cash equivalents of Teekay LNG Partners and
its subsidiaries on hand on the date of determination of
available cash for that quarter resulting from working capital
borrowings made after the end of that quarter; |
|
|
|
(b) less the amount of cash reserves established by our
general partner to: |
|
|
|
(1) provide
for the proper conduct of the business of Teekay LNG Partners
and its subsidiaries (including reserves for future capital
expenditures and for future credit needs of Teekay LNG Partners
and its subsidiaries) after that quarter; |
|
|
|
(2) comply
with applicable law or any debt instrument or other agreement or
obligation to which Teekay LNG Partners or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or its assets are subject; and |
|
|
|
(3) provide
funds for minimum quarterly distributions and cumulative common
unit arrearages for any one or more of the next four quarters; |
|
|
|
provided, however, that the general partner may not
establish cash reserves for distributions to the subordinated
units unless our general partner has determined that the
establishment of reserves will not |
C-1
|
|
|
|
|
prevent Teekay LNG Partners from distributing the minimum
quarterly distribution on all common units and any cumulative
common unit arrearages thereon for the next four quarters; and |
|
|
|
provided, further, that disbursements made by Teekay LNG
Partners or any of its subsidiaries or cash reserves
established, increased or reduced after the end of that quarter
but on or before the date of determination of available cash for
that quarter shall be deemed to have been made, established,
increased or reduced, for purposes of determining available
cash, within that quarter if our general partner so determines. |
|
Bareboat charter: |
|
A charter in which the customer (the charterer) pays a fixed
daily rate for a fixed period of time for the full use of the
vessel and becomes responsible for all crewing, management and
navigation of the vessel and the expenses therefor. |
|
Boil-off: |
|
LNG that evaporates during its transport voyage and converts
into natural gas, which is then used to assist in propelling the
LNG carrier. |
|
Bunkers: |
|
Any hydrocarbon mineral oil used or intended to be used for the
operation or propulsion of a ship. |
|
Capital account: |
|
The capital account maintained for a partner under the
partnership agreement. The capital account in respect of a
general partner interest, a common unit, a subordinated unit, an
incentive distribution right or other partnership interest will
be the amount which that capital account would be if that
general partner interest, common unit, subordinated unit,
incentive distribution right or other partnership interest were
the only interest in Teekay LNG Partners held by a partner. |
|
Capital surplus: |
|
All available cash distributed by us from any source will be
treated as distributed from operating surplus until the sum of
all available cash distributed since the closing of the initial
public offering equals the operating surplus as of the end of
the quarter before that distribution. Any excess available cash
will be deemed to be capital surplus. |
|
Charter: |
|
The hiring of a vessel, or use of its carrying capacity, for
either (1) a specified period of time or (2) a
specific voyage or set of voyages. |
|
CLC: |
|
International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution
Damage, 1969, as amended. |
|
Closing price: |
|
The last sale price on a day, regular way, or in case no sale
takes place on that day, the average of the closing bid and
asked prices on that day, regular way, as reported in the
principal consolidated transaction reporting system for
securities listed on the principal national securities exchange
(other than the Nasdaq Stock Market) on which the units of that
class are listed. If the units of that class are not listed on
any national securities exchange (other than the Nasdaq Stock
Market), the last quoted price on that day. If no quoted price
exists, the average of the high bid and low asked prices on that
day in the over-the-counter market, as reported by the Nasdaq
Stock Market or any other system then in use. If on any day the
units of that class are not quoted by any organization of that
type, the average of the closing bid and asked prices on that
day as furnished by a professional |
C-2
|
|
|
|
|
market maker making a market in the units of the class selected
by our general partner. If on that day no market maker is making
a market in the units of that class, the fair value of the units
on that day as determined reasonably and in good faith by our
general partner. |
|
COFR: |
|
Certificates of financial responsibility sufficient to meet
potential liabilities under OPA 90 and CERCLA, which owners and
operators of vessels, including LNG carriers, must establish and
maintain with the United States Coast Guard. |
|
Common unit arrearage: |
|
The amount by which the minimum quarterly distribution for a
quarter during the subordination period exceeds the distribution
of available cash from operating surplus actually made for that
quarter on a common unit, cumulative for that quarter and all
prior quarters during the subordination period. |
|
Current market price: |
|
For any class of units listed on any national securities
exchange as of any date, the average of the daily closing prices
for the 20 consecutive trading days immediately prior to that
date. |
|
Double hull: |
|
Hull construction technique by which a ship has an inner and
outer hull, separated by void space, usually several feet in
width. |
|
Dwt: |
|
Deadweight, a measure of oil tanker carrying capacity, usually
in tons, based upon weight of cargo and other items necessary to
submerge the vessel to its maximum permitted draft. |
|
EBITDA: |
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. |
|
Estimated maintenance capital expenditures: |
|
An estimate made by the board of directors of our general
partner, with the concurrence of the conflicts committee, of the
average quarterly maintenance capital expenditures that Teekay
LNG Partners will incur over the long-term. The estimate will be
made annually and whenever an event occurs that is likely to
result in a material adjustment to the amount of maintenance
capital expenditures on a long-term basis. |
|
Expansion capital expenditures: |
|
Cash capital expenditures for acquisitions or capital
improvements. Expansion capital expenditures include the cash
cost of equity and debt capital during construction of a capital
asset. Expansion capital expenditures do not include maintenance
capital expenditures. |
|
GAAP: |
|
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. |
|
General and administrative expenses: |
|
General and administrative expenses consist of employment costs
of shoreside staff and cost of facilities, as well as legal,
audit and other administrative costs. |
|
Hire Rate: |
|
The agreed sum or rate to be paid by the charterer for the use
of the vessel. |
|
IGC Code: |
|
International Code for Construction and Equipment of Ships
Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk, which specifies certain
requirements for LNG carriers, including regulations regarding
carrier design and construction. |
|
IMO: |
|
International Maritime Organization, a United Nations agency
that issues international trade standards for shipping. |
C-3
|
|
|
Incentive distribution right: |
|
A non-voting limited partner partnership interest issued to the
general partner. The partnership interest will confer upon its
holder only the rights and obligations specifically provided in
the partnership agreement for incentive distribution rights. |
|
Incentive distributions: |
|
The distributions of available cash from operating surplus
initially made to the general partner that are in excess of the
general partners aggregate 2% general partner interest. |
|
Interim capital transactions: |
|
The following transactions if they occur prior to liquidation: |
|
|
|
(a) Borrowings, refinancings or refundings of indebtedness
and sales of debt securities (other than for working capital
borrowings and other than for items purchased on open account in
the ordinary course of business) by Teekay LNG Partners or any
of its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
(b) sales of equity interests by Teekay LNG Partners or any
of its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
(c) sales or other voluntary or involuntary dispositions of
any assets of Teekay LNG Partners or any of its subsidiaries
(other than sales or other dispositions of inventory, accounts
receivable and other assets in the ordinary course of business,
and sales or other dispositions of assets as a part of normal
retirements or replacements); |
|
|
|
(d) the termination of interest rate swap agreements; |
|
|
|
(e) capital contributions; or |
|
|
|
(f) corporate reorganizations or restructurings. |
|
ISM Code: |
|
International Safety Management Code for the Safe Operation of
Ships and for Pollution Prevention, which, among other things,
requires vessel owners to obtain a safety management
certification for each vessel they manage. |
|
ISPS: |
|
International Security Code for Ports and Ships, which enacts
measures to detect and prevent security threats to ships and
ports. |
|
Liquefaction: |
|
The process of liquefying natural gas. |
|
LNG: |
|
Liquefied natural gas. |
|
Long-term charter: |
|
An LNG charter to an entity for a term greater than ten years or
an oil tanker charter for a term greater than five years. |
|
Maintenance capital expenditure: |
|
Cash capital expenditures (including expenditures for the
addition or improvement to our capital assets or for the
acquisition of existing, or the construction of new, capital
assets) if such expenditure is made to maintain over the long
term the operating capacity of or the revenue generated by
Teekay LNG Partners capital assets, as such assets existed
at the time of such expenditure. Maintenance capital
expenditures include the cash cost of equity and debt capital
during construction of a capital asset. Maintenance capital
expenditures do not include expansion capital expenditures. |
|
Newbuilding: |
|
A new vessel under construction. |
|
Off-hire: |
|
The time during which a vessel is not available for service. |
C-4
|
|
|
OPA 90: |
|
The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990, as amended. |
|
Operating expenditures: |
|
All cash expenditures of Teekay LNG Partners and its
subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, taxes,
reimbursements of the general partner, repayment of working
capital borrowings, debt service payments and capital
expenditures, subject to the following: |
|
|
|
(a) Payments (including prepayments and prepayment
penalties) of principal of and premium on indebtedness, other
than working capital borrowings will not constitute operating
expenditures. |
|
|
|
(b) Operating expenditures will not include expansion
capital expenditures or actual maintenance capital expenditures
but will include estimated maintenance capital expenditures. |
|
|
|
(c) Operating expenditures will not include: |
|
|
|
|
(1) Payment
of transaction expenses (including taxes) relating to interim
capital transactions; or |
|
|
|
|
(2) Distributions
to partners. |
|
|
|
Where capital expenditures consist of both maintenance capital
expenditures and expansion capital expenditures, the general
partner, with the concurrence of the conflicts committee, shall
determine the allocation between the portion consisting of
maintenance capital expenditures and the portion consisting of
expansion capital expenditures, and the period over which the
maintenance capital expenditures will be deducted as an
operating expenditure in calculating operating surplus. |
|
Operating surplus: |
|
For any period prior to liquidation, on a cumulative basis and
without duplication: |
|
|
|
(a) the sum of |
|
|
|
(1) $10 million; |
|
|
|
(2) all
the cash of Teekay LNG Partners and its subsidiaries on hand as
of the closing date of its initial public offering, other than
cash reserved to terminate interest rate swap agreements; |
|
|
|
(3) all
cash receipts of Teekay LNG Partners and its subsidiaries for
the period beginning on the closing date of the initial public
offering and ending with the last day of that period, other than
cash receipts from interim capital transactions; |
|
|
|
(4) all
cash receipts of Teekay LNG Partners and its subsidiaries after
the end of that period but on or before the date of
determination of operating surplus for the period resulting from
working capital borrowings; |
|
|
|
|
(5) interest
paid on debt incurred (including periodic net interest payments
under related interest rate swap agreements) and cash
distributions paid on equity securities issued, in each case, to
finance all or any portion of the construction of a capital
improvement or replacement asset and paid during the period
prior to the earlier of the completion of construction or being
abandoned or disposed of; and |
|
C-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) interest
paid on debt incurred (including periodic net interest payments
under related interest rate swap agreements) and cash
distributions on equity securities issued, in each case, to pay
the construction period interest, or to pay construction period
distributions or equity issued to finance all or any portion of
the construction of a capital improvement or replacement asset
as described in (5) above, less |
|
|
|
|
(b) the sum of: |
|
|
|
(1) operating
expenditures for the period beginning on the closing date of the
initial public offering and ending with the last day of that
period, including estimated maintenance capital expenditures and
the repayment of working capital borrowers, but not (x) the
repayment of other borrowings or (y) expenditures incurred
in connection with the expansion or increase in the
transportation capacity of our fleet; and |
|
|
|
(2) the
amount of cash reserves established by our general partner to
provide funds for future operating expenditures; provided
however, that disbursements made (including contributions to a
member of Teekay LNG Partners and its subsidiaries or
disbursements on behalf of a member of Teekay LNG Partners and
its subsidiaries) or cash reserves established, increased or
reduced after the end of that period but on or before the date
of determination of available cash for that period shall be
deemed to have been made, established, increased or reduced for
purposes of determining operating surplus, within that period if
the general partner so determines. |
|
RasGas II: |
|
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II), a joint
venture between Qatar Petroleum (formerly Qatar General
Petroleum Corporation) and Exxon Mobil RasGas Inc. (formerly
Mobil QM Gas Inc.), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
ExxonMobil Corporation, established for the purpose of expanding
LNG production in Qatar. |
|
Regasification: |
|
The process of returning LNG to its gaseous state. |
|
Short-term charter: |
|
An LNG charter for a term less than ten years or an oil
tanker charter for a term less than five years. |
|
SOLAS: |
|
International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, which
provides, among other things, rules for the construction and
equipment of commercial vessels. |
|
Spot market: |
|
The market for chartering a vessel for single voyages. |
|
Subordination period: |
|
The subordination period will generally extend from the closing
of the initial public offering until the first to occur of: |
|
|
|
(a) the first day of any quarter beginning after
March 31, 2010, for which: |
|
|
|
(1) distributions
of available cash from operating surplus on each of the
outstanding common units and subordinated units equaled or
exceeded the sum of the minimum quarterly distributions on all
of the outstanding common units and subordinated units for each
of the three consecutive, |
C-6
|
|
|
|
|
non-overlapping four-quarter periods immediately preceding that
date; |
|
|
|
(2) the
adjusted operating surplus generated during each of the three
consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods immediately
preceding that date equaled or exceeded the sum of the minimum
quarterly distributions on all of the common units and
subordinated units that were outstanding during those periods on
a fully diluted basis, and the related distribution on the
general partner interest in Teekay LNG Partners; and |
|
|
|
(3) there
are no outstanding cumulative common units arrearages. |
|
|
|
(b) the date on which the general partner is removed as
general partner of Teekay LNG Partners upon the requisite vote
by the limited partners under circumstances where cause does not
exist and units held by our general partner and its affiliates
are not voted in favor of the removal; |
|
|
|
provided, however, that subordinated units may convert into
common units as described in Cash Distribution
Policy Subordination Period. |
|
Suezmax tanker: |
|
An oil tanker of a size and capacity that make it capable of
transiting the Suez Canal when fully loaded, and usually filling
within a range of 120,000 to 200,000 dwt. |
|
Tapias: |
|
Naviera F. Tapias S.A., which Teekay Shipping Corporation
renamed as Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. following its acquisition
of Tapias on April 30, 2004, and which Teekay Shipping
Corporation will contribute to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. on the
closing of this offering. |
|
Tcf: |
|
Trillion cubic feet, a measure of natural gas volume. |
|
Teekay Spain: |
|
Teekay Shipping Spain S.L., formerly Naviera F.
Tapias S.A. prior to its acquisition by Teekay Shipping
Corporation on April 30, 2004, and which Teekay Shipping
Corporation will contribute to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. on
the closing of this offering. |
|
Time charter: |
|
A charter in which the charterer pays for the use of a
ships cargo capacity for a specified period of time. The
owner provides the ship with crew, stores and provisions, ready
in all aspects to load cargo and proceed on a voyage as directed
by the charterer. The charterer usually pays for bunkering and
all voyage-related expenses, including canal tolls and port
charges. |
|
Voyage charter: |
|
A charter in which the charterer pays for the use of a
ships cargo capacity for one, or sometimes more than one,
voyage between specified ports. Under this type of charter, the
ship owner pays all the operating costs of the ship (including
bunkers, canal and port charges, pilotage, towage and
ships agency) while payment for cargo handling charges are
subject of agreement between the parties. Freight is generally
paid per unit of cargo, such as a ton, based on an agreed
quantity, or as a lump sum irrespective of the quantity loaded. |
C-7
|
|
|
Working capital borrowings: |
|
Borrowings used exclusively for working capital purposes or to
pay distributions to partners made pursuant to a credit
agreement or other arrangement to the extent such borrowings are
required to be reduced to a relatively small amount each year
for an economically meaningful period of time. |
C-8
APPENDIX D
PRO FORMA, AS ADJUSTED AVAILABLE CASH FROM OPERATING
SURPLUS
The following table shows the calculation of pro forma, as
adjusted available cash from operating surplus and should be
read in conjunction with Cash Available for
Distribution, the Consolidated Audited Financial
Statements of Teekay Shipping Spain S.L. and of Teekay
Luxembourg S.a.r.l., and the Teekay LNG Partners L.P. Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in | |
|
|
thousands) | |
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$ |
(2,334 |
) |
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
37,808 |
|
|
Pro forma interest expense
|
|
|
33,343 |
|
|
Pro forma interest income
|
|
|
(22,211 |
) |
|
Pro forma provision for income taxes
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma EBITDA(a)
|
|
|
47,476 |
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma foreign currency loss
|
|
|
16,139 |
|
|
Pro forma interest rate swap loss
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
Pro forma loss on sale of other assets
|
|
|
11,922 |
|
|
Pro forma gain on sale of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
|
Pro forma write-down of capitalized loan costs
|
|
|
8,016 |
|
|
Pro forma unrestricted interest received(b)
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
Pro forma maintenance capital expenditures
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
Pro forma unrestricted cash interest paid(b)
|
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
Pro forma realized foreign currency gain
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
Pro forma income taxes paid
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma available cash from operating surplus
|
|
|
70,366 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated additional maintenance capital expenditures(c)
|
|
|
12,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma, as adjusted available cash from operating
surplus(d)(e)
|
|
$ |
58,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization. |
|
(b) |
Under certain capital lease arrangements, we maintain restricted
cash deposits that, together with interest, equal the remaining
amounts we owe under the capital leases. The interest we receive
from those deposits is used solely to pay interest associated
with the capital leases, and the amount of interest we receive
approximate the amount of interest we pay on the capital leases.
Since these amounts approximately offset each other but may be
paid in different periods within a fiscal year, we exclude both
the restricted interest received and the related restricted
interest paid from our calculation of pro forma as adjusted
available cash for operating surplus. |
|
(c) |
Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct
from operating surplus each quarter estimated maintenance
capital expenditures as opposed to actual maintenance capital
expenditures in |
D-1
|
|
|
order to reduce disparities in operating surplus caused by
fluctuating maintenance capital expenditures, such as drydocking
and vessel replacement. Because of the substantial capital
expenditures we are required to make to maintain our fleet, our
initial annual estimated maintenance capital expenditures for
purposes of calculating operating surplus will be
$16.4 million per year, which is comprised of
$4.4 million for drydocking costs for all of our vessels
and $12.0 million, including financing costs, for replacing
the vessels in our fleet at the end of their useful lives. The
actual cost of replacing the vessels in our fleet will depend on
a number of factors, including prevailing market conditions,
charter rates and the availability and cost of financing at the
time of replacement. The board of directors of our general
partner with the approval of its conflicts committee may
determine to increase the annual amount of our estimated
maintenance capital expenditures. In years when estimated
maintenance capital expenditures are higher than actual
maintenance capital expenditures, the amount of cash available
for distribution to unitholders will be lower than if actual
maintenance capital expenditures were deducted from operating
surplus. |
|
|
(d) |
The pro forma adjustments in the pro forma financial statements
are based upon currently available information and certain
estimates and assumptions. The pro forma financial statements do
not purport to present the financial position or results of
operations of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. had the transactions to
be effected at the closing of this offering actually been
completed as of the date indicated. Furthermore, the pro forma
financial statements are based on accrual accounting concepts
whereas available cash from operating surplus is defined in the
partnership agreement primarily on a cash accounting basis. As a
consequence, the amount of pro forma, as adjusted available
cash from operating surplus shown above should be viewed as a
general indication of the amounts of available cash from
operating surplus that may in fact have been generated by Teekay
LNG Partners had it been formed in earlier periods. |
|
(e) |
The amounts of available cash from operating surplus needed to
pay the minimum quarterly distribution for one quarter and for
four quarters on the common units, subordinated units, and the
2% general partner interest to be outstanding immediately after
this offering are approximately: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Quarter | |
|
Four Quarters | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Common units
|
|
$ |
6,078 |
|
|
$ |
24,312 |
|
Subordinated units
|
|
|
6,078 |
|
|
|
24,312 |
|
General partner
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
12,404 |
|
|
$ |
49,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of pro forma, as adjusted available cash from
operating surplus generated during the year ended
December 31, 2004 would have been sufficient to allow us to
pay the full minimum quarterly distribution on all the common
units and subordinated units.
D-2
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
6,000,000 Common Units
Representing Limited Partner Interests
PROSPECTUS
May 4, 2005
Book-Running Manager
Citigroup
Co-Lead Manager
UBS Investment Bank
A.G. Edwards
Wachovia Securities
Raymond James
Jefferies & Company, Inc.
Deutsche Bank Securities
Until May 29, 2005 (25 days after the date of this
prospectus), all dealers that buy, sell or trade our common
units, whether or not participating in this offering, may be
required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the
dealers obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as
underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or
subscriptions.