FORM N-Q
Investment Company Act file number 811- 5497
Municipal High Income Fund Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 1-800-451-2010
MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND INC.
ITEM 1. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND INC.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) | July 31, 2005 |
|
||||||
|
RATING | |
VALUE | |||
|
||||||
MUNICIPAL BONDS 96.8%
|
||||||
Alabama 0.7%
|
||||||
$ 615,000
|
NR | Capstone Improvement District of Brookwood, AL, Series A, 7.700% due | ||||
8/15/23 (a) |
$ |
61,500 | ||||
1,000,000
|
AAA | West Jefferson, AL, Amusement & Public Park Authority Revenue, | ||||
Visionland Project, Call 12/1/06 @102, 8.000% due 12/1/26 (b)
|
1,086,940 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Alabama | 1,148,440 | |||||
|
||||||
Alaska 3.0%
|
||||||
1,055,000
|
NR | Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority Revenue, Williams Lynxs | ||||
Alaska Cargoport, 8.125% due 5/1/31 (c) | 1,120,136 | |||||
Alaska State Housing Financial
Corp., General Housing: |
||||||
2,000,000
|
AAA | Series A, FGIC-Insured, 5.000% due 12/1/26 (d)(e) | 2,104,960 | |||
1,650,000
|
AAA | Series B, MBIA-Insured, 5.250% due 12/1/30 | 1,770,351 | |||
|
||||||
Total Alaska | 4,995,447 | |||||
|
||||||
Arizona 3.1%
|
||||||
1,500,000
|
NR | Casa Grande, AZ, IDA, Hospital Revenue, Casa Grande Regional Medical | ||||
Center, Series A, 7.625% due 12/1/29 | 1,612,170 | |||||
935,000
|
NR | Maricopa County, AZ, IDA, MFH Revenue, Gran Victoria Housing LLC | ||||
Project, Series B, 10.000% due 5/1/31 (f) | 944,415 | |||||
1,795,000
|
NR | Phoenix, AZ, IDA, MFH Revenue, Ventana Palms Apartments Project, Series | ||||
B, 8.000% due 10/1/34 | 1,549,265 | |||||
1,000,000
|
AAA | Yuma & La Paz Counties, Arizonal Community College District, Arizona | ||||
Western College, FSA-Insured, 5.000% due 7/1/24 | 1,060,110 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Arizona | 5,165,960 | |||||
|
||||||
Arkansas 1.1%
|
||||||
Arkansas State Development Financing Authority: | ||||||
1,000,000
|
BBB |
Hospital Revenue, Washington Regional Medical Center, Call 2/1/10 @
|
||||
100, 7.375% due 2/1/29 (b) | 1,167,560 | |||||
600,000
|
BB+ |
Industrial Facilities Revenue, Potlatch Corp. Projects, Series A, 7.750%
|
||||
due 8/1/25 (c) | 687,732 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Arkansas | 1,855,292 | |||||
|
||||||
California 10.8%
|
||||||
1,500,000
|
NR | Barona, CA, Band of Mission Indians, GO, 8.250% due 1/1/20 (f) | 1,576,320 | |||
2,000,000
|
A3(g) | California Health Facilities Financing Authority Revenue, Refunding, Cedars- | ||||
Sinai Medical Center, 5.000% due 11/15/27 | 2,068,020 | |||||
California State Department of Water Resources & Power Supply Revenue, | ||||||
Series A: | ||||||
5,000,000
|
AAA | MBIA-IBC-Insured, 5.375% due 5/1/21 (d)(e) | 5,465,650 | |||
1,500,000
|
AAA | XLCA-Insured, 5.375% due 5/1/17 | 1,644,375 | |||
1,500,000
|
NR | California Statewide CDA Revenue, East Valley Tourist Project, Series A, | ||||
9.250% due 10/1/20 | 1,655,400 | |||||
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., California Tobacco Settlement | ||||||
Revenue: | ||||||
2,000,000
|
BBB | Asset Backed, Series A-4, 7.800% due 6/1/42 (d)(e) | 2,460,920 | |||
1,000,000
|
A- |
Enhanced Asset Backed, Series B, Call 6/1/13 @ 100, 5.625% due
|
||||
6/1/38 (b) | 1,121,790 | |||||
1,865,000
|
Ba2(g) | Vallejo, CA, COP, Touro University, 7.375% due 6/1/29 | 1,936,579 | |||
|
||||||
Total California | 17,929,054 | |||||
|
||||||
Colorado 4.1%
|
||||||
500,000
|
NR | Beacon Point Metropolitan District, GO, Series A, 6.250% due 12/1/35 | 505,745 | |||
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Revenue: | ||||||
Charter School: | ||||||
890,000
|
AAA |
Peak to Peak Project, Call 8/15/11 @100, 7.500% due 8/15/21 (b)
|
1,051,660 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
1
MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND INC.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued) | July 31, 2005 |
|
||||||
|
RATING | |
VALUE | |||
|
||||||
Colorado (continued)
|
||||||
$ 1,230,000
|
AAA |
Bromley School Project, Refunding, XLCA-Insured, 5.125% due
|
||||
9/15/25 |
$
|
1,311,438 | ||||
2,000,000
|
NR |
Colorado Lutheran High School Association Project, Series A, 7.625%
|
||||
due 6/1/34 (d)(e) | 2,107,900 | |||||
785,000
|
NR | Elbert County Charter, 7.375% due 3/1/35 | 793,611 | |||
500,000
|
NR | High Plains, CO, Metropolitan District, Series A, 6.250% due 12/1/35 | 505,745 | |||
500,000
|
NR | Southlands, CO, Metropolitan District Number 1, GO, 7.125% due 12/1/34 | 551,020 | |||
|
||||||
Total Colorado | 6,827,119 | |||||
|
||||||
District of Columbia 1.3%
|
||||||
1,895,000
|
AAA | District of Columbia COP, District Public Safety & Emergency, AMBAC- | ||||
Insured, 5.500% due 1/1/20 (d)(e) | 2,093,406 | |||||
|
||||||
Florida 11.7%
|
||||||
1,000,000
|
NR | Beacon Lakes, FL, Community Development District, Special Assessment, | ||||
Series A, 6.900% due 5/1/35 | 1,041,790 | |||||
1,500,000
|
NR | Bonnet Creek Resort Community Development District, Special Assessment, | ||||
7.500% due 5/1/34 | 1,621,905 | |||||
2,000,000
|
NR | Capital Projects Finance Authority of Florida\Student Housing Revenue, | ||||
Capital Projects Loan Program, Florida University, Series A, 7.850% due
|
||||||
8/15/31 (d)(e) | 1,983,040 | |||||
2,000,000
|
NR | Capital Projects Finance Authority, FL, Continuing Care Retirement | ||||
Glenridge on Palmer Ranch, Series A, 8.000% due 6/1/32 (d)(e)
|
2,207,540 | |||||
1,000,000
|
NR | Capital Trust Agency Revenue, Seminole Tribe Convention Center, Series A, | ||||
10.000% due 10/1/33 | 1,102,270 | |||||
980,000
|
NR | Century Parc Community Development District, Special Assessment, 7.000% | ||||
due 11/1/31 | 1,042,191 | |||||
1,000,000
|
A | Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Revenue, Adventist Health | ||||
Systems, Series D, 6.000% due 11/15/25 | 1,096,100 | |||||
875,000
|
NR | Homestead, FL, IDR, Community Rehabilitation Providers Program, Series | ||||
A, 7.950% due 11/1/18 | 880,014 | |||||
2,000,000
|
BB+ | Martin County, FL, IDA Revenue, Indiantown Cogeneration Project, Series | ||||
A, 7.875% due 12/15/25 (c)(d)(e) | 2,060,600 | |||||
1,000,000
|
NR | Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Revenue, First Mortgage, | ||||
GF/Orlando, Inc. Project, 9.000% due 7/1/31 | 1,031,140 | |||||
495,000
|
AAA | Palm Beach County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Revenue, John F. | ||||
Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. Project, 9.500% due 8/1/13 (h)
|
617,730 | |||||
2,000,000
|
NR | Reunion East Community Development District, Special Assessment, Series | ||||
A, 7.375% due 5/1/33 (d)(e) | 2,216,600 | |||||
1,000,000
|
B- | Santa Rosa, FL, Bay Bridge Authority Revenue, 6.250% due 7/1/28 | 1,005,730 | |||
1,515,000
|
NR | Waterlefe, FL, Community Development District, Golf Course Revenue, | ||||
8.125% due 10/1/25 | 1,533,756 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Florida | 19,440,406 | |||||
|
||||||
Georgia 4.8%
|
||||||
Atlanta, GA, Airport Revenue: | ||||||
1,000,000
|
AAA | Series B, FGIC-Insured, 5.625% due 1/1/30 (c) | 1,058,490 | |||
1,000,000
|
AAA | Series G, FSA-Insured, 5.000% due 1/1/26 | 1,057,640 | |||
2,500,000
|
NR | Atlanta, GA, Tax Allocation, Atlantic Station Project, 7.900% due | ||||
12/1/24 (d)(e) | 2,736,325 | |||||
1,000,000
|
NR |
Brunswick & Glynn County,
GA, Development Authority, First Mortgage
|
||||
Revenue, Coastal Community Retirement, Series A, 7.250% due 1/1/35
|
1,049,950 | |||||
1,000,000
|
BBB+(i) |
Gainesville & Hall County,
GA, Development Authority Revenue, Senior
|
||||
Living Facilities, Lanier Village Estates, Series C, 7.250% due 11/15/29
|
1,080,920 | |||||
1,005,000
|
NR | Walton County, GA, IDA Revenue, Walton Manufacturing Co. Project, | ||||
8.500% due 9/1/07 | 1,035,351 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Georgia | 8,018,676 | |||||
|
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
2
MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND INC.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued) | July 31, 2005 |
|
||||||
|
RATING |
|
VALUE | |||
|
||||||
Illinois 1.3%
|
||||||
$ 2,000,000
|
AAA |
Chicago, IL, GO, Neighborhoods Alive 21 Program, FGIC-Insured, Call
|
||||
1/1/11 @ 100, 5.500% due 1/1/31
(b)(d)(e)
|
$
|
2,166,840 | ||||
|
||||||
Indiana 2.1%
|
||||||
2,500,000
|
BBB |
East Chicago Industrial, PCR, IN, Inland Steel Co. Project Number 10,
|
||||
6.800% due 6/1/13 (d)(e)
|
2,514,850 | |||||
1,000,000
|
BBB- |
Indiana State Development Finance Authority, PCR, Inland Steel Co. Project
|
||||
Number 13, 7.250% due 11/1/11 (c)
|
1,042,190 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Indiana
|
3,557,040 | |||||
|
||||||
Louisiana 2.1%
|
||||||
1,000,000
|
NR |
Epps, LA, COP, 8.000% due 6/1/18
|
1,039,100 | |||
1,600,000
|
NR |
Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities, CDA Revenue, St.
|
||||
James Place, Series A, 7.000% due 11/1/25
|
1,508,928 | |||||
1,000,000
|
BB- |
Port of New Orleans, LA, IDR, Continental Grain Co. Project, 7.500%
|
||||
due 7/1/13
|
1,014,460 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Louisiana
|
3,562,488 | |||||
|
||||||
Maryland 1.0%
|
||||||
1,500,000
|
NR |
Maryland State Economic Development Corp. Revenue, Chesapeake Bay,
|
||||
Series A, 7.730% due 12/1/27
|
1,594,230 | |||||
|
||||||
Massachusetts 4.2%
|
||||||
955,000
|
NR |
Boston, MA, IDA Revenue, Roundhouse Hospitality LLC Project, 7.875%
|
||||
due 3/1/25 (c)
|
965,361 | |||||
1,000,000
|
NR |
Massachusetts State DFA Revenue, Briarwood, Series B, Call 12/1/10 @ 101,
|
||||
8.250% due 12/1/30 (b)
|
1,237,840 | |||||
1,000,000
|
BBB |
Massachusetts State HEFA Revenue, Caritas Christi Obligation, Series B,
|
||||
6.750% due 7/1/16
|
1,132,040 | |||||
1,900,000
|
NR |
Massachusetts State IFA Revenue, Assisted Living Facilities, Marina Bay
|
||||
LLC Project, 7.500% due 12/1/27 (c)(d)(e)
|
1,967,773 | |||||
425,000
|
AAA |
Massachusetts State Port Authority Revenue, 13.000% due 7/1/13 (h)
|
604,074 | |||
1,000,000
|
AAA |
Massachusetts State, School Building Authority, Dedicated Sales Tax
|
||||
Revenue, Series A, FSA-Insured, 5.000% due 8/15/20
|
1,076,820 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Massachusetts
|
6,983,908 | |||||
|
||||||
Michigan 6.9%
|
||||||
2,130,000
|
NR |
Allen Academy, COP, 7.500% due 6/1/23 (d)(e)
|
2,090,744 | |||
Cesar Chavez Academy, COP:
|
||||||
1,000,000
|
NR |
8.000% due 2/1/33
|
1,045,250 | |||
1,000,000
|
NR |
7.250% due 2/1/33
|
984,780 | |||
1,900,000
|
Ba1(g) |
Garden City, MI, HFA, Hospital Revenue, Garden City Hospital Obligation
|
||||
Group, Series A, 5.625% due 9/1/10
|
1,896,181 | |||||
1,000,000
|
NR |
Gaudior Academy, COP, 7.250% due 4/1/34
|
1,019,930 | |||
1,750,000
|
NR |
Kalamazoo Advantage Academy, COP, 8.000% due 12/1/33
|
1,780,415 | |||
1,000,000
|
NR |
Merritt Academy, COP, 7.250% due 12/1/24
|
1,010,620 | |||
1,000,000
|
NR |
Star International Academy, COP, 7.000% due 3/1/33
|
1,020,880 | |||
700,000
|
NR |
William C. Abney Academy, COP, 6.750% due 7/1/19
|
696,829 | |||
|
||||||
Total Michigan
|
11,545,629 | |||||
|
||||||
Minnesota 0.5%
|
||||||
1,000,000
|
NR |
Minneapolis & St. Paul,
MN, Metropolitan Airport Commission Special
|
||||
Facilities Revenue, Northwest Airlines Project, Series A, 7.000% due
|
||||||
4/1/25
(c) |
920,070 | |||||
|
||||||
Mississippi 0.9%
|
||||||
1,480,000
|
Aaa(g) |
Jackson, MS, Public School District, FSA-Insured, 5.000% due 10/1/20
|
1,593,871 | |||
|
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
3
MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND INC.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued) | July 31, 2005 |
FACE | ||||||
AMOUNT | RATING | |
VALUE | |||
|
||||||
Missouri 0.2%
|
||||||
$ 250,000
|
NR | St. Joseph, MO, IDA Health Care Revenue, Living Community of St. Joseph | ||||
Project, 7.000% due 8/15/32 |
$ |
265,085 | ||||
|
||||||
Montana 1.5%
|
||||||
2,515,000
|
NR | Montana State Board of Investment, Resource Recovery Revenue, | ||||
Yellowstone Energy LP Project, 7.000% due 12/31/19 (c)(d)(e)
|
2,486,731 | |||||
|
||||||
New Hampshire 1.0% | ||||||
1,600,000
|
A | New Hampshire HEFA Revenue, Covenant Health System, 5.500% due | ||||
7/1/34 | 1,686,288 | |||||
|
||||||
New Jersey 5.7%
|
||||||
1,500,000
|
AAA | Casino Reinvestment Development Authority Revenue, Series A, MBIA- | ||||
Insured, 5.250% due 6/1/20 | 1,628,175 | |||||
New Jersey EDA: | ||||||
1,230,000
|
NR |
First Mortgage, Lions Gate Project, Series A, 5.875% due 1/1/37
|
1,250,812 | |||
1,000,000
|
NR |
Retirement Community Revenue, SeaBrook Village, Inc., Series A,
|
||||
8.250% due 11/15/30 | 1,114,970 | |||||
3,000,000
|
BBB- | New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority Revenue, Trinitas | ||||
Hospital Obligation Group, 7.500% due 7/1/30 | 3,372,840 | |||||
1,750,000
|
BBB | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 6.750% due 6/1/39 (d)(e) | 2,083,550 | |||
|
||||||
Total New Jersey | 9,450,347 | |||||
|
||||||
New Mexico 1.4%
|
||||||
Albuquerque, NM, Hospital Revenue, Southwest Community Health Services, | ||||||
Call 8/1/08 @100: | ||||||
200,000
|
AAA | 10.000% due 8/1/12 (b) | 229,810 | |||
105,000
|
AAA | 10.125% due 8/1/12 (b) | 120,954 | |||
1,000,000
|
NR | Otero County, NM, Jail Project Revenue, 7.500% due 12/1/24 | 985,420 | |||
940,000
|
NR | Sandoval County, NM, Project Revenue, Santa Ana Pueblo Project, 7.750% | ||||
due 7/1/15 | 968,820 | |||||
|
||||||
Total New Mexico | 2,305,004 | |||||
|
||||||
New York 7.3%
|
||||||
700,000
|
NR | Brookhaven, NY, IDA Civic Facilities Revenue, Memorial Hospital Medical | ||||
Center, Inc., Series A, 8.250% due 11/15/30 | 759,248 | |||||
500,000
|
Aaa(g) | Herkimer County, NY, IDA, Folts Adult Home, Series A, FHA-Insured, | ||||
GNMA-Collateralized, 5.500% due 3/20/40 | 546,650 | |||||
2,000,000
|
AAA | Metropolitan Transportation Authority of New York, Series A, AMBAC- | ||||
Insured, 5.000% due 7/1/30 (d)(e) | 2,088,940 | |||||
1,000,000
|
NR | Monroe County, NY, IDA, Civic Facilities Revenue, Woodland Village | ||||
Project, 8.550% due 11/15/32 | 1,085,360 | |||||
New York City, NY, IDA, Civic Facilities Revenue: | ||||||
1,340,000
|
NR |
Community Residence for the Developmentally Disabled Project,
|
||||
7.500% due 8/1/26 | 1,402,618 | |||||
1,000,000
|
NR |
Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program, Series A-1, 8.125% due 7/1/19
|
1,086,310 | |||
1,000,000
|
AAA | New York City, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & Sewer | ||||
System Revenue, Series C, MBIA-Insured, 5.000% due 6/15/27
|
1,063,200 | |||||
New York State Dormitory Authority Revenue: | ||||||
1,500,000
|
AAA |
Mental Health Services Facilities Improvement, Series B, AMBAC-
|
||||
Insured, 5.000% due 2/15/35 | 1,582,590 | |||||
1,450,000
|
AAA |
Montefiore Hospital, FGIC/FHA-Insured, 5.000% due 8/1/29
|
1,531,910 | |||
970,000
|
NR | Suffolk County, NY, IDA, Civic Facilities Revenue, Eastern Long Island | ||||
Hospital Association, Series A, 7.750% due 1/1/22 | 1,009,722 | |||||
|
||||||
Total New York | 12,156,548 | |||||
|
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
4
MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND INC.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued) | July 31, 2005 |
FACE | ||||||
|
RATING | |
VALUE | |||
|
||||||
North Carolina 0.6% | ||||||
$ 965,000 | NR | North Carolina Medical Care Community, Health Care Facilities Revenue, | ||||
First Mortgage, DePaul Community
Facilities Project, 7.625% due 11/1/29
|
$ | 1,009,294 | ||||
|
||||||
Ohio 2.8%
|
||||||
1,500,000 | BBB | Cuyahoga County, OH\Hospital Facilities Revenue, Canton, Inc. Project, | ||||
7.500% due 1/1/30 | 1,687,815 | |||||
Montgomery County, OH, Health Systems Revenue: | ||||||
1,035,000 | AAA | Series B-1, Call 7/1/06 @102, 8.100% due 7/1/18 (b) | 1,103,465 | |||
260,000 | AAA |
Unrefunded Balance, Series B-1, Call 7/1/06 @102, 8.100% due 7/1/18 (b)
|
276,071
|
|||
1,500,000 | BB+ | Ohio State Air Quality Development Authority Revenue, Cleveland Pollution | ||||
Control, Series A, 6.000% due 12/1/13 | 1,586,850 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Ohio | 4,654,201 | |||||
|
||||||
Pennsylvania 3.5%
|
||||||
2,200,000 | NR | Allegheny County, PA, IDA, Airport Special Facitlities Revenue, USAir, Inc. | ||||
Project, Series B, 8.500% due 3/1/21 (a)(c) | 46,750 | |||||
1,000,000 | NR | Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Retirement Community | ||||
Revenue, Wesley Affiliated Services Inc. Project, Series A, 7.250% due 1/1/35
|
1,079,160
|
|||||
2,640,000 | NR | Montgomery County, PA, Higher Education & Health Authority Revenue, | ||||
Temple Continuing Care Center, 6.625% due 7/1/19 (a) | 528,264 | |||||
990,000 | NR | Northumberland County, PA, IDA Facilities Revenue, NHS Youth Services, | ||||
Inc. Project, Series A, 7.500% due 2/15/29 | 1,021,205 | |||||
1,000,000 | NR | Philadelphia, PA, Authority for IDR, Host Marriot LP Project, Remarketed | ||||
10/31/95, 7.750% due 12/1/17 | 1,014,250 | |||||
2,000,000 | NR | Westmoreland County, PA, IDA Revenue, Health Care Facilities, Redstone | ||||
Highlands Health, Series B, 8.125% due 11/15/30 (d)(e) | 2,181,640 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Pennsylvania | 5,871,269 | |||||
|
||||||
South Carolina 0.4% | ||||||
225,000 | NR | Florence County, SC, IDR, Stone Container Corp., 7.375% due 2/1/07 | 226,130 | |||
385,000 | NR | McCormick County, SC, COP, 9.750% due 7/1/09 | 388,838 | |||
|
||||||
Total South Carolina | 614,968 | |||||
|
||||||
Texas 10.2%
|
||||||
1,155,000 | Ba1(g) | Bexar County, TX, Housing Finance Corp., MFH Revenue, Nob Hill | ||||
Apartments, Series B, 8.500% due 6/1/31 | 1,111,711 | |||||
965,000 | NR | Bexar County, TX, Housing Financial Corp., MFH Revenue, Continental | ||||
Lady Ester, Series A, 6.875% due 6/1/29 | 911,298 | |||||
1,000,000 | NR | Grand Prairie, TX, Housing Finance Corp., Independent Senior Living Center | ||||
Revenue, 7.750% due 1/1/34 | 1,017,150 | |||||
2,000,000 | BB | Gulf Coast of Texas, IDA, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue, CITGO Petroleum | ||||
Corp. Project, 7.500% due 10/1/12 (c)(d)(e)(j) | 2,257,820 | |||||
2,750,000 | B- | Houston, TX, Airport Systems Revenue, Special Facilities, Continental | ||||
Airlines, Inc. Project, Series C, 6.125% due 7/15/27 (c)(d)(e) | 2,319,955 | |||||
1,100,000 | NR | Intercontinental Airport, Houston Public Facilities Corp. Project Revenue, | ||||
7.750% due 5/1/26 | 1,096,425 | |||||
1,000,000 | AAA | Laredo, TX, ISD Public Facility Corp. Lease Revenue, Series A, AMBAC- | ||||
Insured, 5.000% due 8/1/29 | 1,031,310 | |||||
1,000,000 | NR | Midlothian, TX, Development Authority, Tax Increment Contract Revenue, | ||||
6.200% due 11/15/29 | 1,014,750 | |||||
1,000,000 | AAA | North Texas Throughway Authority, Dallas North Tollway Systems Revenue, | ||||
Series A, FSA-Insured, 5.000% due 1/1/35 | 1,048,150 | |||||
1,000,000 | BB- | Port Corpus Christi, TX, Industrial Development Corp., CITGO Petroleum | ||||
Corp. Project, 8.250% due 11/1/31 (c) | 1,069,610 | |||||
965,000 | B3(g) | Texas State Affordable Housing Corp., MFH Revenue, HIC | ||||
Arborstone/Baybrook, Series C, 7.250% due 11/1/31 (k)(l) | 66,585 | |||||
|
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
5
MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND INC.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued) | July 31, 2005 |
|
||||||
|
RATING | |
VALUE | |||
|
||||||
Texas (continued)
|
||||||
$ 1,865,000
|
|
West Texas Detention Facility Corp. Revenue, 8.000% due 2/1/25
|
$
|
1,927,104 | ||
|
Willacy County, TX, PFC Project Revenue:
|
|||||
1,000,000
|
|
County Jail, 7.500% due 11/1/25
|
1,021,270 | |||
1,000,000
|
|
Series A-1, 8.250% due 12/1/23
|
1,040,670 | |||
|
||||||
Total Texas
|
16,933,808 | |||||
|
||||||
Virginia 1.6%
|
||||||
505,000
|
|
Alexandria, VA, Redevelopment & Housing
Authority, MFH Revenue,
|
||||
|
Parkwood Court Apartments Project, Series C, 8.125% due 4/1/30
|
510,616 | ||||
1,000,000
|
|
Broad Street CDA Revenue, 7.500% due 6/1/33
|
1,106,400 | |||
1,000,000
|
|
Fairfax County, VA, EDA Revenue, Retirement Community, Greenspring
|
||||
Village, Inc., Series A, 7.500% due 10/1/29
|
1,068,510 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Virginia
|
2,685,526 | |||||
|
||||||
Wisconsin 1.0%
|
||||||
Wisconsin State HEFA Revenue:
|
||||||
1,000,000
|
BBB+ |
Aurora Health Care, 6.400% due 4/15/33
|
1,110,050 | |||
1,745,000
|
|
Benchmark Healthcare of Green Bay, Inc. Project, Series A, 7.750%
|
||||
due 5/1/27 (a)
|
523,779 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Wisconsin
|
1,633,829 | |||||
|
||||||
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS
|
||||||
(Cost $161,179,019)
|
161,150,774 | |||||
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
COMMON STOCK 0.0%
|
||||||
ENERGY 0.0%
|
||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 0.0%
|
||||||
Mobile Energy Services LLC, Restricted*(k)(l)
|
||||||
3,180
|
(Cost $988,235)
|
0 | ||||
|
||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS BEFORE SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
|
||||||
(Cost $162,167,254)
|
161,150,774 | |||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RATING |
|
||||
|
||||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS 3.9%(m)
|
||||||
California 0.3%
|
||||||
$ 500,000
|
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Series B-1, SPA-Dexia,
|
||||
2.230%, 8/4/05
|
500,000 | |||||
|
||||||
Florida 0.3%
|
||||||
500,000
|
VMIG1(g) |
Brevard County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, Refunding Bonds, Health
|
||||
First Inc. Project, LOC-Suntrust Bank, 2.330%, 8/1/05
|
500,000 | |||||
|
||||||
Oregon 0.2%
|
||||||
400,000
|
VMIG1(g) |
Oregon State GO, Series 73G, SPA-JPMorgan Chase Bank, 2.300%, 8/3/05
|
400,000 | |||
|
||||||
Pennsylvania 0.8%
|
||||||
Philadelphia, PA:
|
||||||
300,000
|
|
Hospital & Higher Children's
Hospital PA, Children's Hospital
|
||||
|
Philadelphia A, SPA-Fleet National Bank, 2.330%, 8/1/05
|
300,000 | ||||
1,000,000
|
|
Hospitals & Higher Education
Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue,
|
||||
Children's Hospital Project, Series A, SPA-JPMorgan Chase Bank,
|
||||||
2.330%, 8/1/05
|
1,000,000 | |||||
|
||||||
Total Pennsylvania
|
1,300,000 | |||||
|
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
6
MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND INC.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued) | July 31, 2005 |
FACE | |||||||
|
SECURITY | VALUE | |||||
|
|||||||
Tennessee 0.5%
|
|||||||
$ 800,000 | VMIG1(g) | Sevier County, TN, Public Building Authority, Local Government | |||||
Improvement, Series IV-H-1, AMBAC-Insured, SPA-JPMorgan Chase
|
|||||||
Bank, 2.330%, 8/1/05 |
$
|
800,000 | |||||
|
|||||||
Texas 1.8%
|
|||||||
Harris County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Revenue: | |||||||
1,400,000 |
|
Refunding Bonds, The Methodist Systems, Series B, 2.330%, 8/1/05
|
1,400,000 | ||||
1,600,000 |
|
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Series B, 2.330%, 8/1/05 | 1,600,000 | ||||
|
|||||||
Total Texas | 3,000,000 | ||||||
|
|||||||
TOTAL SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS | |||||||
(Cost $6,500,000) | 6,500,000 | ||||||
|
|||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 100.7% (Cost $168,667,254#) | 167,650,774 | ||||||
Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets (0.7)% | (1,199,885 | ) | |||||
|
|||||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS 100.0% |
$
|
166,450,889 | |||||
|
* | Non-income producing security. | |
| All ratings are by Standard & Poors Ratings Service, unless otherwise footnoted. | |
(a) | Security is currently in default. | |
(b) | Pre-Refunded bonds are escrowed with government securities and are considered by the manager to be triple-A rated even if issuer has not applied for new ratings. | |
(c) | Income from this issue is considered a preference item for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax (AMT). | |
(d) | All or a portion of this security is segregated for open futures contracts. | |
(e) | All or a portion of this security is segregated for extended settlements. | |
(f) | All or a portion of this security is held at the broker as collateral for open futures contracts. | |
(g) | Rating by Moody's Investors Service. | |
(h) | Bonds are escrowed to maturity by government securities and are considered by the manager to be triple-A rated even if issuer has not applied for new ratings. | |
(i) | Rating by Fitch Rating Service. | |
(j) | Maturity date shown represents the mandatory tender date. | |
(k) | Illiquid security. | |
(l) | Security is valued in good faith at fair value by or under the direction of the Board of Directors. | |
(m) | Variable rate demand obligation has a demand feature under which the Fund could tender it back to the issuer on no more than 7 days notice. Date shown is the date of the next interest rate change. | |
# | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is substantially the same. | |
Abbreviations used in this schedule: | ||
AMBAC - CDA - COP - DFA - EDA - FGIC - FHA - FSA - GNMA - GO - HEFA - HFA - IBC - IDA - IDR - IFA - ISD - LOC - MBIA - MFH - PCR - PFC - SPA - VA - XLCA - |
Ambac Assurance Corporation Community Development Authority Certificate of Participation Development Finance Agency Economic Development Authority Financial Guaranty Insurance Company Federal Housing Administration Financial Security Assurance Government National Mortgage Association General Obligation Health & Educational Facilities Authority Housing Finance Authority Insured Bond Certificates Industrial Development Authority Industrial Development Revenue Industrial Finance Agency Independent School District Letter of Credit Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation Multi-Family Housing Pollution Control Revenue Public Facilities Corporation Standby Bond Purchase Agreement Veterans Administration XL Capital Assurance |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
7
Summary of Investments by Industry * | ||
Hospitals | 15.9 | % |
Education | 13.5 | |
Life Care Systems | 11.6 | |
Industrial Development | 6.3 | |
Pre-Refunded | 5.7 | |
Transportation | 5.7 | |
Pollution Control | 4.8 | |
Utilities | 4.3 | |
Public Facilities | 3.6 | |
Multi-Family Housing | 3.1 | |
Cogeneration Facilities | 2.7 | |
Tobacco | 2.7 | |
Single-Family Housing | 2.3 | |
General Obligation | 1.4 | |
Water & Sewer | 0.9 | |
Escrowed to Maturity | 0.7 | |
Tax Allocation | 0.6 | |
Miscellaneous | 14.2 | |
Total | 100.0 | % |
* As a percent of total investments.
8
The definitions of the applicable rating symbols are set forth below:
Standard & Poors Ratings Service (Standard & Poors)Ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus () sign to show relative standings within the major rating categories.
AAA | |
Bonds rated AAA have the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poors.
Capacity to pay interest and
|
repay principal is extremely strong. | ||
AA | |
Bonds rated AA have
a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal and differ
from the
|
highest rated issues only in a small degree. | ||
A | |
Bonds rated A have
a strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal although they
are somewhat
|
more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than debt | ||
in higher rated categories. | ||
BBB | |
Bonds rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal. |
Whereas they normally exhibit adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or | ||
changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay | ||
principal for bonds in this category than in higher rated categories. | ||
BB, B, | ||
CCC, | ||
CC and C | |
Bonds rated BB, B, CCC, CC and C are regarded, on balance, as predominantly speculative |
with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the | ||
obligation. BB represents the lowest degree of speculation and C the highest degree of speculation. | ||
While such bonds will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by | ||
large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions. | ||
D | |
Bonds rated D are in default and payment of interest and/or repayment of principal is in arrears. |
Moodys Investors Service (Moodys)Numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 may be applied to each generic rating from Aa to Ca, where 1 is the highest and 3 the lowest ranking within its generic category.
Aaa | |
Bonds rated Aaa are
judged to be of the best quality. They carry the smallest degree of
investment
|
risk and are generally referred to as gilt edge. Interest payments are protected by a large or by an | ||
exceptionally stable margin and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are likely to | ||
change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position | ||
of such issues. | ||
Aa | |
Bonds rated Aa are judged to be of
high quality by all standards. Together with the Aaa group they
|
comprise what are generally known as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds | ||
because margins of protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuation of protective | ||
elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the long-term | ||
risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa securities. | ||
A | |
Bonds rated A possess
many favorable investment attributes and are to be considered as upper
|
medium grade obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest are considered adequate but | ||
elements may be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment some time in the future. | ||
Baa | |
Bonds rated Baa are
considered as medium grade obligations, i.e., they are neither highly
protected
|
nor poorly secured. Interest payments and principal security appear adequate for the present but certain | ||
protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great length of | ||
time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in fact have speculative characteristics | ||
as well. |
9
Ba | |
Bonds rated Ba are
judged to have speculative elements; their future cannot be considered
as well
|
assured. Often the protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate and therefore | ||
not well safeguarded during both good and bad times over the future. Uncertainty of position | ||
characterizes bonds in this class. | ||
B | |
Bonds rated B are
generally lack characteristics of desirable investments. Assurance
of interest and
|
principal payments or of maintenance of other terms of the contract over any long period of time may | ||
be small. | ||
Caa | |
Bonds rated Caa are
of poor standing. These may be in default, or present elements of danger
may
|
exist with respect to principal or interest. | ||
Ca | |
Bonds rated Ca represent
obligations which are speculative in a high degree. Such issues are
often in
|
default or have other marked short-comings. | ||
C | |
Bonds rated C are
the lowest class of bonds and issues so rated can be regarded as having
extremely
|
poor prospects of ever attaining any real investment standing. |
Fitch Rating Service (Fitch)Ratings from AAA to CC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus () sign to show relative standings within the major rating categories
AAA | |
Bonds rated AAA have the highest rating assigned by Fitch. Capacity to pay interest and repay |
principal is extremely strong. | ||
AA | |
Bonds rated AA have
a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal and differ
from the
|
highest rated issues only in a small degree. | ||
A | |
Bonds rated A have
a strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal although they
are somewhat
|
more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than debt | ||
in higher rated categories. | ||
BBB | |
Bonds rated BBB are
regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal.
|
Whereas they normally exhibit adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or | ||
changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay | ||
principal for bonds in this category than in higher rated categories. | ||
BB, B, | ||
CCC | ||
and CC | |
Bonds rated BB, B, CCC and CC are
regarded, on balance, as predominantly speculative with
|
respect to capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation. | ||
BB represents a lower degree of speculation than B, and CC the highest degree of speculation. | ||
While such bonds will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by | ||
large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions. | ||
NR | |
Indicates that the bond is not rated by Standard & Poors, Moodys, or Fitch. |
SP-1 | | Standard & Poors highest rating indicating very strong or strong capacity to pay principal and interest; |
those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics are denoted with a plus (+) sign.
|
||
A-1 | | Standard & Poors highest commercial paper and variable-rate demand obligation (VRDO) rating |
indicating that the degree of safety regarding timely payment is either overwhelming or very strong;
|
||
those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics are denoted with a plus (+) sign.
|
||
VMIG 1 | | Moodys highest rating for issues having a demand feature VRDO. |
P-1 | | Moodys highest rating for commercial paper and for VRDO prior to the advent of the VMIG 1 rating. |
F-1 | | Fitchs highest rating indicating the strongest capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; |
those issues determined to possess overwhelming strong credit feature are denoted with a plus (+) sign.
|
10
Notes to Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Municipal High Income Fund Inc. ("Fund"), a Maryland corporation, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, closed-end management investment company.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund and are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
(a) Investment Valuation. Securities are valued at the mean between the bid and asked prices provided by an independent pricing service that are based on transactions in municipal obligations, quotations from municipal bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various relationships between securities. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or for which market quotations are determined not to reflect fair value, will be valued in good faith by or under the direction of the Funds Board of Directors. Short-term obligations with maturities of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates value.
(b) Financial Futures Contracts. The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts typically to hedge a portion of the portfolio. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit cash or securities as initial margin. Additional securities are also segregated up to the current market value of the financial futures contracts. Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuation in the value of the underlying financial instruments. The Fund recognizes an unrealized gain or loss equal to the daily variation margin. When the financial futures contracts are closed, a realized gain or loss is recognized equal to the difference between the proceeds from (or cost of) the closing transactions and the Funds basis in the contracts.
The risks associated with entering into financial futures contracts include the possibility that a change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying instruments. In addition, investing in financial futures contracts involves the risk that the Fund could lose more than the original margin deposit and subsequent payments required for a futures transaction. Risks may also arise upon entering into these contracts from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts.
(c) Credit and Market Risk. The Fund invests in high-yield instruments that are subject to certain credit and market risks. The yields of high-yield obligations reflect, among other things, perceived credit risk. The Funds investments in securities rated below investment grade typically involve risks not associated with higher rated securities including, among others, greater risk related to timely and ultimate payment of interest and principal, greater market price volatility and less liquid secondary market trading.
(d) Security Transactions. Security transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis.
2. Investments
At July 31, 2005, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments for federal income tax purposes were substantially as follows:
Gross unrealized appreciation |
$
|
8,007,403 | ||
Gross unrealized depreciation | (9,023,883 | ) | ||
|
||||
Net unrealized depreciation |
$
|
(1,016,480 | ) | |
|
At July 31, 2005, the Fund had the following open futures contracts:
Number of | Expiration | Basis |
|
Unrealized | ||||||
Contracts | Date | Value |
|
Gain | ||||||
|
||||||||||
Contracts to Sell: | ||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds | 400 | 9/05 | $46,525,000 |
|
$400,000 | |||||
|
11
ITEM 2. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. | |
(a) |
The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a- 3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
(b) |
There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the registrants last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting. | |
ITEM 3. |
EXHIBITS. | |
Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are attached hereto. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Municipal High Income Fund Inc.
By | /s/ R. Jay Gerken | |
R. Jay Gerken | ||
Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: | September 29, 2005 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /s/ R. Jay Gerken | |
R. Jay Gerken | ||
Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: | September 29, 2005 |
By | /s/ Kaprel Ozsolak | |
Kaprel Ozsolak | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
Date: | September 29, 2005 |