CKH-09.30.2013-10Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 ________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
________________________________________ 
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013              or             
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to             
Commission file number 1-12289
SEACOR Holdings Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
________________________________________ 
Delaware
 
13-3542736
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
2200 Eller Drive, P.O. Box 13038,
 
 
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
 
33316
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)
954-523-2200
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Not Applicable
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
________________________________________ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ý     No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  x
 
Accelerated filer  ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer  ¨
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ¨    No  ý
The total number of shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding as of October 25, 2013 was 20,331,865. The Registrant has no other class of common stock outstanding.


Table of Contents

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
Table of Contents
 
Part I.
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Part II.
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1A.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 6.


i

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data, unaudited)
 
September 30,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current Assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
332,767

 
$
248,204

Restricted cash
20,893

 
28,285

Marketable securities
25,660

 
21,668

Receivables:
 
 
 
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $920 and $1,201 in 2013 and 2012, respectively
211,853

 
224,944

Other
39,774

 
45,334

Inventories
25,442

 
25,787

Deferred income taxes
3,530

 
3,530

Prepaid expenses and other
10,746

 
12,719

Discontinued operations

 
108,153

Total current assets
670,665

 
718,624

Property and Equipment:
 
 
 
Historical cost
2,208,315

 
2,238,383

Accumulated depreciation
(835,604
)
 
(763,803
)
 
1,372,711

 
1,474,580

Construction in progress
129,481

 
110,296

Net property and equipment
1,502,192

 
1,584,876

Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies
365,891

 
272,535

Construction Reserve Funds & Title XI Reserve Funds
229,021

 
195,629

Goodwill
17,978

 
17,978

Intangible Assets, Net
13,583

 
15,305

Other Assets
52,394

 
55,123

Discontinued Operations

 
840,724

 
$
2,851,724

 
$
3,700,794

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
Current Liabilities:
 
 
 
Current portion of long-term debt
$
26,973

 
$
21,920

Current portion of capital lease obligations
11

 
2,900

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
73,063

 
107,892

Other current liabilities
114,663

 
93,093

Discontinued operations

 
39,836

Total current liabilities
214,710

 
265,641

Long-Term Debt
675,206

 
655,309

Capital Lease Obligations
22

 
59

Deferred Income Taxes
437,436

 
426,027

Deferred Gains and Other Liabilities
133,503

 
120,342

Discontinued Operations

 
490,741

Total liabilities
1,460,877

 
1,958,119

Equity:
 
 
 
SEACOR Holdings Inc. stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued nor outstanding

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized; 37,168,978 and 36,740,324 shares issued in 2013 and 2012, respectively
372

 
367

Additional paid-in capital
1,358,273

 
1,330,324

Retained earnings
1,096,988

 
1,473,509

Shares held in treasury of 16,837,113 and 16,852,391 in 2013 and 2012, respectively, at cost
(1,088,219
)
 
(1,088,560
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
(1,809
)
 
(1,986
)
 
1,365,605

 
1,713,654

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
25,242

 
29,021

Total equity
1,390,847

 
1,742,675

 
$
2,851,724

 
$
3,700,794


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
and should be read in conjunction herewith.

1

Table of Contents

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except share data, unaudited)
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Operating Revenues
$
336,784

 
$
338,855

 
$
919,411

 
$
945,929

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
239,540

 
254,005

 
680,566

 
706,969

Administrative and general
31,463

 
39,509

 
101,826

 
110,801

Depreciation and amortization
33,503

 
34,347

 
100,834

 
97,269

 
304,506

 
327,861

 
883,226

 
915,039

Gains on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net
19,230

 
9,064

 
33,550

 
16,183

Operating Income
51,508

 
20,058

 
69,735

 
47,073

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income
4,280

 
3,890

 
10,665

 
13,925

Interest expense
(10,520
)
 
(10,076
)
 
(31,282
)
 
(30,075
)
Debt extinguishment losses, net

 

 

 
(160
)
Marketable security gains (losses), net
(1,149
)
 
(1,730
)
 
9,403

 
13,224

Derivative losses, net
(303
)
 
(2,030
)
 
(3,235
)
 
(2,434
)
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
2,230

 
1,028

 
(2,697
)
 
1,665

Other, net
477

 
7,098

 
675

 
7,457

 
(4,985
)
 
(1,820
)
 
(16,471
)
 
3,602

Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense and Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies
46,523

 
18,238

 
53,264

 
50,675

Income Tax Expense
15,984

 
7,702

 
21,306

 
20,412

Income from Continuing Operations Before Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies
30,539

 
10,536

 
31,958

 
30,263

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
230

 
(1,297
)
 
7,071

 
6,659

Income from Continuing Operations
30,769

 
9,239

 
39,029

 
36,922

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax

 
6,265

 
(211
)
 
26,254

Net Income
30,769

 
15,504

 
38,818

 
63,176

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries
478

 
(598
)
 
130

 
(663
)
Net Income attributable to SEACOR Holdings Inc.
$
30,291

 
$
16,102

 
$
38,688

 
$
63,839

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income (Loss) attributable to SEACOR Holdings Inc.:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
30,291

 
$
9,837

 
$
38,799

 
$
37,585

Discontinued operations

 
6,265

 
(111
)
 
26,254

 
$
30,291

 
$
16,102

 
$
38,688

 
$
63,839

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share of SEACOR Holdings Inc.:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
1.52

 
$
0.48

 
$
1.96

 
$
1.83

Discontinued operations

 
0.31

 
(0.01
)
 
1.28

 
$
1.52

 
$
0.79

 
$
1.95

 
$
3.11

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share of SEACOR Holdings Inc.:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
1.36

 
$
0.47

 
$
1.92

 
$
1.80

Discontinued operations

 
0.31

 

 
1.26

 
$
1.36

 
$
0.78

 
$
1.92

 
$
3.06

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
19,964,695

 
20,432,997

 
19,843,778

 
20,512,118

Diluted
24,601,584

 
20,740,456

 
20,198,449

 
20,838,468

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
and should be read in conjunction herewith.

2

Table of Contents

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Net Income
 
$
30,769

 
$
15,504

 
$
38,818

 
$
63,176

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation gains (losses)
 
4,050

 
2,123

 
(488
)
 
3,908

Reclassification of foreign currency translation losses to foreign currency gains (losses), net
 

 

 

 
758

Derivative gains (losses) on cash flow hedges
 
192

 
(619
)
 
572

 
(1,290
)
Reclassification of derivative losses on cash flow hedges to interest expense
 

 
655

 

 
1,951

Reclassification of derivative (gains) losses on cash flow hedges to equity in earnings (losses) of 50% or less owned companies
 
(65
)
 
167

 
253

 
386

Reclassification of derivative losses on cash flow hedges to derivative losses, net upon dedesignation
 

 
1,330

 

 
1,330

Other
 

 

 

 
42

 
 
4,177

 
3,656

 
337

 
7,085

Income tax expense
 
(1,311
)
 
(1,200
)
 
(125
)
 
(2,345
)
 
 
2,866

 
2,456

 
212

 
4,740

Comprehensive Income
 
33,635

 
17,960

 
39,030

 
67,916

Comprehensive Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries
 
910

 
(369
)
 
110

 
(277
)
Comprehensive Income attributable to SEACOR Holdings Inc.
 
$
32,725

 
$
18,329

 
$
38,920

 
$
68,193















The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
and should be read in conjunction herewith.

3

Table of Contents

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in thousands, unaudited)
 
 
SEACOR Holdings Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
 
Non-
Controlling
Interests In
Subsidiaries
 
Total
Equity
 
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Shares
Held In
Treasury
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
December 31, 2012
 
$
367

 
$
1,330,324

 
$
1,473,509

 
$
(1,088,560
)
 
$
(1,986
)
 
$
29,021

 
$
1,742,675

Issuance of common stock:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
 

 

 

 
1,770

 

 

 
1,770

Exercise of stock options
 
3

 
15,446

 

 

 

 

 
15,449

Director stock awards
 

 
168

 

 

 

 

 
168

Restricted stock and restricted stock units
 
2

 
(24
)
 

 
135

 

 

 
113

Distribution of Era Group stock to shareholders
 

 

 
(415,209
)
 

 
(55
)
 
(107
)
 
(415,371
)
Share award settlements for Era Group employees and directors
 

 
(631
)
 

 

 

 

 
(631
)
Amortization of share awards
 

 
11,426

 

 

 

 

 
11,426

Cancellation of restricted stock
 

 
1,564

 

 
(1,564
)
 

 

 

Issuance of noncontrolling interests
 

 

 

 

 

 
40

 
40

Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 

 

 

 

 

 
(3,822
)
 
(3,822
)
Net income
 

 

 
38,688

 

 

 
130

 
38,818

Other comprehensive income (loss)
 

 

 

 

 
232

 
(20
)
 
212

Nine months ended September 30, 2013
 
$
372

 
$
1,358,273

 
$
1,096,988

 
$
(1,088,219
)
 
$
(1,809
)
 
$
25,242

 
$
1,390,847
































The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
and should be read in conjunction herewith.

4

Table of Contents

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, unaudited)
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities of Continuing Operations
$
134,698

 
$
98,633

Cash Flows from Investing Activities of Continuing Operations:
 
 
 
Purchases of property and equipment
(146,483
)
 
(165,044
)
Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment
205,735

 
14,715

Investments in and advances to 50% or less owned companies
(91,492
)
 
(34,507
)
Return of investments and advances from 50% or less owned companies
10,642

 
77,981

Net advances on revolving credit line to 50% or less owned companies

 
(300
)
(Advances) principal payments on third party notes receivable, net
(63
)
 
17,751

Net (increase) decrease in restricted cash
7,392

 
(170,501
)
Net (increase) decrease in construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds
(33,392
)
 
80,042

Payments received on third party leases, net
2,667

 
2,586

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
(10,540
)
 
(148,088
)
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations
(55,534
)
 
(325,365
)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities of Continuing Operations:
 
 
 
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations
(13,129
)
 
(67,178
)
Net borrowings (repayments) under inventory financing arrangements
4,183

 
(13,368
)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
10

 
115,134

Common stock acquired for treasury

 
(28,726
)
Share award settlements for Era Group employees and directors
(357
)
 

Proceeds and tax benefits from share award plans
17,195

 
8,400

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests, net of issuances
(3,782
)
 
(1,895
)
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations
4,120

 
12,367

Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
(643
)
 
1,944

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents from Continuing Operations
82,641

 
(212,421
)
Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations:
 
 
 
Operating Activities
24,298

 
99,629

Investing Activities
(8,502
)
 
(7,219
)
Financing Activities
(14,017
)
 
(64,090
)
Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
143

 
687

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents from Discontinued Operations
1,922

 
29,007

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
84,563

 
(183,414
)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
248,204

 
381,482

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
$
332,767

 
$
198,068






The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
and should be read in conjunction herewith.

5

Table of Contents

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICY
The condensed consolidated financial information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 has been prepared by the Company and has not been audited by its independent registered public accounting firm. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SEACOR Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made to fairly present the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2013, its results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, its comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, its changes in equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, and its cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. Results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year or any future periods.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Unless the context otherwise indicates, any reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the “Company” refers to SEACOR Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and any reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “SEACOR” refers to SEACOR Holdings Inc.
Discontinued Operations. On January 31, 2013, the Company completed the spin-off ("Spin-off") of Era Group Inc. (“Era Group”), the company that operated SEACOR's Aviation Services business segment, by means of a dividend to SEACOR's stockholders of all the issued and outstanding common stock of Era Group. Era Group filed a Registration Statement on Form 10 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, describing the Spin-off, that was declared effective on January 14, 2013. Era Group is now an independent company whose common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "ERA." Discontinued operations includes the historical financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Era Group as well as the operations previously reported as discontinued in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (see Note 14).
Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. Revenue is realized or realizable and earned when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue that does not meet these criteria is deferred until the criteria are met. Deferred revenues, included in other current liabilities, for the nine months ended September 30 were as follows (in thousands): 
 
2013
 
2012
Balance at beginning of period
$
6,592

 
$
9,845

Revenues deferred during the period

 
2,827

Revenues recognized during the period

 
(7,007
)
Balance at end of period
$
6,592

 
$
5,665

As of September 30, 2013, deferred revenues of $6.6 million were related to the time charter of several offshore support vessels scheduled to be paid through the conveyance of an overriding royalty interest (the "Conveyance") in developmental oil and gas producing properties operated by a customer in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Payments under the Conveyance, and the timing of such payments, are contingent upon production and energy sale prices. On August 17, 2012, the customer filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The Company is vigorously defending its interest in connection with the bankruptcy filing; however, payments received under the Conveyance subsequent to August 17, 2012 are subject to bankruptcy court approval. The Company will continue to recognize revenues as cash is received and approved by the bankruptcy court or earlier should future collection become reasonably assured. All costs and expenses related to these charters were recognized as incurred.

6

Table of Contents

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
 
 
SEACOR Holdings Inc. Stockholders' Equity
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
 
 
 
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
 
Derivative
Losses on
Cash Flow
Hedges, net
 
Other
 
Total
 
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
 
Other
 
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
December 31, 2012
 
$
(1,238
)
 
$
(732
)
 
$
(16
)
 
$
(1,986
)
 
$
321

 
$
(10
)
 
 
Distribution of Era Group stock to shareholders
 
(55
)
 

 

 
(55
)
 

 

 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
(468
)
 
825

 

 
357

 
(20
)
 

 
$
337

Income tax (expense) benefit
 
164

 
(289
)
 

 
(125
)
 

 

 
(125
)
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
 
$
(1,597
)
 
$
(196
)
 
$
(16
)
 
$
(1,809
)
 
$
301

 
$
(10
)
 
$
212

Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications of prior period information have been made to conform to the presentation of the current period information. These reclassifications had no effect on net income as previously reported.
2.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company utilizes a fair value hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value and defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs derived from observable market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The Company’s financial assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2013 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
Marketable securities(1)
$
25,660

 
$

 
$

Derivative instruments (included in other receivables)
177

 
5,238

 

Construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds
229,021

 

 

LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
Short sale of marketable securities (included in other current liabilities)
8,837

 

 

Derivative instruments (included in other current liabilities)
384

 
3,299

 

 ______________________
(1)
Marketable security gains (losses), net include unrealized losses of $1.2 million and unrealized losses of $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to marketable security positions held by the Company as of September 30, 2013. Marketable security gains (losses), net include unrealized gains of $9.4 million and unrealized losses of $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to marketable security positions held by the Company as of September 30, 2013.

7

Table of Contents

The estimated fair values of the Company’s other financial assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2013 were as follows (in thousands): 
 
 
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
$
353,660

 
$
353,660

 
$

 
$

Investments, at cost, in 50% or less owned companies (included in other
  assets)
9,315

 
see below
 
 
 
 
Notes receivable from other business ventures (included in other
assets)
26,462

 
see below
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt, including current portion(1)
702,179

 

 
838,218

 

______________________
(1)
The estimated fair value includes the conversion option on the Company's 2.5% Convertible Notes.
The carrying value of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates fair value. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was estimated based upon quoted market prices or by using discounted cash flow analyses based on estimated current rates for similar types of arrangements. It was not practicable to estimate the fair value of the Company’s investments, at cost, in 50% or less owned companies because of the lack of quoted market prices and the inability to estimate fair value without incurring excessive costs. It was not practicable to estimate the fair value of the Company’s notes receivable from other business ventures as the overall returns are uncertain due to certain provisions for additional payments contingent upon future events. Considerable judgment was required in developing certain of the estimates of fair value and, accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.
The Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-lived assets under construction(1)
 
$
17,494

 
$

 
$

Investment in C-Lift LLC(2)
 

 
13,290

 

Contribution of non-cash consideration to Dorian LPG Ltd. (3)
 

 
14,989

 

______________________
(1)
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recognized impairment charges of $3.0 million related to two of Shipping Services' harbor tugs while under construction, which were sold and leased back upon their completion (see Note 5).
(2)
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company marked its equity investment in C-Lift LLC ("C-Lift") to fair value following its acquisition of a controlling interest (see Note 4). The investment's fair value was determined based on the Company's purchase price of the acquired interest.
(3)
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company marked to fair value the non-cash consideration contributed to Dorian LPG Ltd. ("Dorian") in exchange for an equity investment (see Note 6). The fair value was determined based on the value of the equity investment the Company received.

8

Table of Contents

3.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING STRATEGIES
Derivative instruments are classified as either assets or liabilities based on their individual fair values. Derivative assets and liabilities are included in other receivables and other current liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments as of September 30, 2013 were as follows (in thousands): 
 
Derivative
Asset
 
Derivative
Liability
 
 
 
 
Options on equities and equity indices
$
269

 
$

Forward currency exchange, option and future contracts
197

 
215

Interest rate swap agreements

 
3,071

Commodity swap, option and future contracts:
 
 
 
Exchange traded
71

 
383

Non-exchange traded
4,878

 
14

 
$
5,415

 
$
3,683

Cash Flow Hedges. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had no interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges. As of September 30, 2013, one of the Company’s Offshore Marine Services 50% or less owned companies had an interest rate swap agreement maturing in 2015 that has been designated as a cash flow hedge. This instrument calls for this company to pay a fixed interest rate of 1.48% on the amortized notional value of $17.1 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the amortized notional value. As of September 30, 2013, one of the Company’s Inland River Services 50% or less owned companies had four interest rate swap agreements with maturities ranging from 2013 through 2015 that have been designated as cash flow hedges. These instruments call for this company to pay fixed rates of interest ranging from 1.53% to 4.16% on the aggregate amortized notional value of $35.4 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the aggregate amortized notional value. As of September 30, 2013, one of the Company’s Shipping Services 50% or less owned companies had an interest rate swap agreement maturing in 2017 that has been designated as a cash flow hedge. The instrument calls for this company to pay a fixed interest rate of 2.79% on the amortized notional value of $37.8 million and received a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the amortized notional value. As of September 30, 2013, another of the Company's Shipping Services 50% or less owned companies had five interest rate swap agreements with maturities ranging from 2018 to 2020 that have been designated as cash flow hedges. These instruments call for this company to pay fixed rates of interest ranging from 2.96% to 5.40% on the aggregate amortized notional value of $131.7 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the aggregate amortized notional value. By entering into these interest rate swap agreements, the Company's 50% or less owned companies have converted the variable LIBOR component of certain of their outstanding borrowings to a fixed interest rate.
The Company recognized gains (losses) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges for the nine months ended September 30 as follows (in thousands): 
 
2013
 
2012
Interest rate swap agreements, effective portion in other comprehensive income (loss)
$
572

 
$
(1,290
)
Interest rate swap agreements, ineffective portion in derivative losses, net

 
(56
)
 
$
572

 
$
(1,346
)

9

Table of Contents

Other Derivative Instruments. The Company recognized gains (losses) on derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments in derivative losses, net for the nine months ended September 30 as follows (in thousands):
 
2013
 
2012
Options on equities and equity indices
$
(4,132
)
 
$
(734
)
Forward currency exchange, option and future contracts
(439
)
 
884

Interest rate swap agreements
253

 
(1,641
)
Commodity swap, option and future contracts:
 
 
 
Exchange traded
368

 
(2,847
)
Non-exchange traded
715

 
1,960

 
$
(3,235
)
 
$
(2,378
)
The Company, from time to time, holds positions in publicly traded equity options that convey the right or obligation to engage in a future transaction on the underlying equity security or index. The Company’s investment in equity options primarily includes positions in energy, marine, transportation and other related businesses. These contracts are typically entered into to mitigate the risk of changes in the market value of marketable security positions that the Company is either about to acquire, has acquired or is about to dispose of.
The Company enters and settles forward currency exchange, option and future contracts with respect to various foreign currencies. As of September 30, 2013, the outstanding forward currency exchange contracts translated into a net purchase of foreign currencies with an aggregate U.S. dollar equivalent of $13.0 million. These contracts enable the Company to buy currencies in the future at fixed exchange rates, which could offset possible consequences of changes in currency exchange rates with respect to the Company’s business conducted outside of the United States. The Company generally does not enter into contracts with forward settlement dates beyond twelve to eighteen months.
The Company has entered into various interest rate swap agreements with maturities ranging from 2013 through 2018 that call for the Company to pay fixed interest rates ranging from 2.25% to 3.05% on an aggregate amortized notional value of $221.5 million (including an amortized notional value of €10.9 million or $14.8 million) and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR or Euribor on these notional values. As of September 30, 2013, one of the Company’s Offshore Marine Services 50% or less owned companies has entered into an interest rate swap agreement maturing in 2018 that calls for this company to pay a fixed interest rate of 1.30% on the amortized notional value of $105.6 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the amortized notional value. In addition, one of the Company's Shipping Services 50% or less owned companies has entered into an interest rate swap agreement maturing in 2020 that calls for this company to pay a fixed interest rate of 4.35% on the amortized notional value of $0.3 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the amortized notional value. The general purpose of these interest rate swap agreements is to provide protection against increases in interest rates, which might lead to higher interest costs for the Company or its 50% or less owned companies.
The Company enters and settles positions in various exchange and non-exchange traded commodity swap, option and future contracts. The Company's ethanol and industrial alcohol manufacturing facility enters into exchange traded positions (primarily corn) to protect its raw material and finished goods inventory balance from market changes. In the Company’s agricultural trading business, fixed price future purchase and sale contracts for sugar are included in the Company’s non-exchange traded derivative positions. The Company enters into exchange traded positions to protect these purchase and sale contracts as well as its inventory balances from market changes. As of September 30, 2013, the net market exposure to corn and sugar under these contracts was not material. The Company also enters into exchange traded positions (primarily natural gas, heating oil, crude oil, gasoline, corn and sugar) to provide value to the Company should there be a sustained decline in the price of commodities that could lead to a reduction in the market values and cash flows of the Company’s Offshore Marine Services, Inland River Services and Shipping Services businesses. As of September 30, 2013, these positions were not material.
4.
BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
C-Lift Acquisition. On June 6, 2013, the Company acquired a 100% controlling interest in C-Lift through the acquisition of its partner's 50% interest for $12.7 million in cash subject to certain working capital adjustments (see Note 6). C-Lift owns and operates two liftboats in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. The Company performed a fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in no goodwill being recorded. The preliminary fair value analysis is pending completion of a final valuation for the acquired assets and liabilities.

10

Table of Contents

Pantagro Acquisition. On June 25, 2012, the Company acquired a 95% controlling interest in Pantagro-Pantanal Produtos Agropecuarious Ltda. ("Pantagro") for $0.4 million ($0.2 million in cash and $0.2 million in a note payable). Pantagro is an Argentine agricultural trading company focusing primarily on salt. The Company performed a fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in no goodwill being recorded. The fair value analysis was finalized in March 2013.
Superior Lift Boats Acquisition. On March 30, 2012, the Company acquired 18 lift boats, real property and working capital from Superior Energy Inc. (“Superior”) for $142.5 million. The Company performed a fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in no goodwill being recorded. The fair value analysis was finalized in March 2013.
Purchase Price Allocation. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price for the Company’s business acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (in thousands):
Trade and other receivables
$
3,250

Other current assets
32

Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies
(13,290
)
Property and Equipment
43,521

Intangible Assets
1,599

Accounts payable
(264
)
Other current liabilities
(1,640
)
Long-Term Debt
(22,668
)
Purchase price(1)
$
10,540

______________________
(1)
Purchase price is net of cash acquired of $2.2 million.
5.
EQUIPMENT ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS AND DEPRECIATION AND IMPAIRMENT POLICIES
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, capital expenditures were $146.5 million. Equipment deliveries during the period included two specialty offshore support vessels, two liftboats, three wind farm utility vessels, two inland river liquid tank barges and four U.S.-flag harbor tugs.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company sold four crew boats, one mini-supply vessel, one supply vessel, three specialty offshore support vessels, five liftboats, 16 inland river dry cargo barges, eight inland river liquid tank barges, eight U.S.-flag harbor tugs and other property and equipment for net proceeds of $214.7 million ($205.7 million in cash, $0.2 million in vendor credits and $8.8 million in seller financing) and gains of $49.0 million, of which $34.4 million were recognized currently and $14.6 million were deferred. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $2.1 million. Two of the specialty offshore support vessels and the supply vessel were sold to certain of the Company's Offshore Marine Services' 50% or less owned companies for $83.7 million (see Note 6).
The Company has sold certain equipment to its 50% or less owned companies, entered into vessel sale-leaseback transactions with finance companies, and provided seller financing on sales of its equipment to third parties and its 50% or less owned companies. A portion of the gains realized from these transactions were deferred and recorded in deferred gains and other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Deferred gain activity related to these transactions for the nine months ended September 30 was as follows (in thousands):
 
2013
 
2012
Balance at beginning of period
$
111,514

 
$
117,192

Deferred gains arising from asset sales
14,609

 
7,280

Amortization of deferred gains included in operating expenses as a reduction to rental expense
(7,707
)
 
(13,573
)
Amortization of deferred gains included in gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net
(2,146
)
 
(7,872
)
Balance at end of period
$
116,270

 
$
103,027


11

Table of Contents

Equipment, stated at cost, is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset to an estimated salvage value. With respect to each class of asset, the estimated useful life is based upon a newly built asset being placed into service and represents the point at which it is typically not justifiable for the Company to continue to operate the asset in the same or similar manner. From time to time, the Company may acquire older assets that have already exceeded the Company’s useful life policy, in which case the Company depreciates such assets based on its best estimate of remaining useful life, typically the next survey or certification date.
As of September 30, 2013, the estimated useful life (in years) of each of the Company’s major categories of new equipment was as follows:
Offshore support vessels (excluding wind farm utility)
20
Wind farm utility vessels
10
Inland river dry cargo and deck barges
20
Inland river liquid tank barges
25
Inland river towboats
25
U.S.-flag product tankers
25
RORO(1) vessels
20
Harbor tugs
25
Ocean liquid tank barges
25
Terminal and manufacturing facilities
20
______________________ 
(1)
Roll on/Roll off ("RORO").
The Company performs an impairment analysis of long-lived assets used in operations, including intangible assets, when indicators of impairment are present. If the carrying value of the assets is not recoverable, as determined by the estimated undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value of the assets is reduced to fair value. Generally, fair value is determined using valuation techniques, such as expected discounted cash flows or appraisals, as appropriate. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recognized impairment charges of $3.0 million related to two of Shipping Services' harbor tugs while under construction, which were sold and leased back upon their completion.
6.
INVESTMENTS, AT EQUITY, AND ADVANCES TO 50% OR LESS OWNED COMPANIES
OSV Partners. On August 13, 2013, the Company and Breem Transportation Services LLC formed SEACOR OSV Partners GP LLC and SEACOR OSV Partners I LP (collectively "OSV Partners") to own and operate six offshore support vessels, one of which was acquired during the third quarter. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company contributed $1.8 million in capital and provided financing of $7.6 million. During the fourth quarter, OSV Partners anticipates closing on a private placement equity offering with third party limited partner members and a bank financing arrangement.
Dorian. On July 25, 2013, the Company contributed $57.0 million to Dorian in exchange for a 25% noncontrolling ownership interest. The contribution included $42.1 million in net cash and other consideration valued at $14.9 million that included certain progress payments made toward the construction of the two liquefied petroleum gas tankers (Very Large Gas Carriers, otherwise known as VLGCs), the construction contracts for the two VLGCs and the options to construct additional VLGCs. In addition to the VLGC construction contracts, Dorian currently operates a fleet of three VLGCs in international trade.
C-Lift. C-Lift was a 50% or less owned company established to construct and operate liftboats. On June 6, 2013, the Company acquired a 100% controlling interest in C-Lift through the acquisition of its partner's 50% interest for $12.7 million in cash subject to certain working capital adjustments (see Note 4). Upon the acquisition, the Company adjusted its investment in C-Lift to fair value resulting in the recognition of a gain of $4.2 million, net of tax, which is included in equity in earnings (losses) of 50% or less owned companies in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.
Sea-Cat Crewzer II. On January 23, 2013, the Company and another offshore support vessel operator formed Sea-Cat Crewzer II LLC (“Sea-Cat Crewzer II”) to own and operate two high speed offshore catamaran crew boats. The Company and its partner each contributed capital of $23.0 million in cash. Sea-Cat Crewzer II then purchased two high speed offshore catamaran crew boats from the Company for $47.3 million ($44.5 million in cash and $2.8 million in seller financing).

12

Table of Contents

MexMar. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company made an additional cash investment of $5.9 million in Mantenimiento Express Maritimo, S.A.P.I. de C.V. ("MexMar"), an Offshore Marine Services 50% or less owned company. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, MexMar purchased one offshore support vessel from the Company for $36.4 million ($30.4 million in cash and $6.0 million in seller financing). During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, MexMar repaid the $6.0 million of seller financing and the Company provided an additional $1.7 million advance for the purchase of another offshore support vessel from a third party, which was repaid.
SCFCo Holdings. SCFCo Holdings LLC (“SCFCo”) was established to operate towboats and dry cargo barges on the Parana-Paraguay Rivers and a terminal facility at Port Ibicuy, Argentina. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company contributed additional capital of $4.0 million to fund SCFCo’s operations, provided net temporary working capital advances of $2.3 million and received working capital repayments of $1.8 million. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding loans to SCFCo Holdings of $3.4 million.
Bunge-SCF Grain. Bunge-SCF Grain LLC (“Bunge-SCF Grain”) was established to construct and operate a terminal grain elevator in Fairmont City, Illinois. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company and its partner each made a working capital advance of $2.5 million to Bunge-SCF Grain and received $0.5 million of repayments on working capital advances. As of September 30, 2013, the total outstanding balance of working capital advances was $7.0 million.
Witt O'Brien's. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company received dividends of $1.5 million from Witt O'Brien's LLC.
Other. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company made a $0.5 million capital contribution to one of its industrial aviation businesses in Asia. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company received a $1.0 million repayment on advances made to one of its industrial aviation businesses in Asia and dividends of $6.5 million from certain Offshore Marine Services 50% or less owned companies.
Guarantees. The Company has guaranteed the payment of amounts owed by one of its 50% or less owned companies under a vessel charter and has guaranteed amounts owed under banking facilities by certain of its 50% or less owned companies. As of September 30, 2013, the total amount guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was $15.3 million. In addition, as of September 30, 2013, the Company had uncalled capital commitments to two of its 50% or less owned companies for a total of $2.4 million.
7.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As of September 30, 2013, the Company’s unfunded capital commitments were $366.5 million and included: 15 offshore support vessels for $100.6 million; two inland river liquid tank barges for $1.7 million; five inland river towboats for $6.3 million; two U.S.-flag product tankers for $250.5 million and other equipment and improvements for $7.4 million. Of these commitments, $25.0 million is payable during the remainder of 2013, $300.5 million is payable during 2014-2015 and $41.0 million is payable during 2016-2017. Subsequent to September 30, 2013, the Company committed to purchase two offshore support vessels and one inland river towboat for a total of $39.2 million.
On July 14, 2010, a group of individuals and entities purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Terry G. Robin, et al. v. Seacor Marine, L.L.C., et al., No. 2:10-CV-01986 (E.D. La.) (the “Robin Case”), in which they asserted that support vessels, including vessels owned by the Company, responding to the explosion and resulting fire that occurred aboard the semi-submersible drilling rig, the Deepwater Horizon, were negligent in their efforts to save lives and put out the fire and contributed to the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon and subsequent oil spill. The action was part of the overall multi-district litigation, In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”, MDL No. 2179 (“MDL”). The complaint sought compensatory, punitive, exemplary, and other damages. In response to this lawsuit, the Company filed petitions seeking exoneration from, or limitation of liability in relation to, any actions that may have been taken by vessels owned by the Company to extinguish the fire. On June 8, 2011, the Company moved to dismiss these claims (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee) on various legal grounds. On October 12, 2011, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss in its entirety, dismissing with prejudice all claims that had been filed against the Company in the limitation actions (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee that was not subject to the motion to dismiss). The Court entered final judgments in favor of the Company in the Robin Case and each of the limitation actions on November 21, 2011. On December 12, 2011, the claimants appealed each of those judgments to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ("Fifth Circuit"). The claimants' opening brief was submitted on May 7, 2012, and the claimants filed a reply brief on June 1, 2012. Oral argument was not requested by the Fifth Circuit. On December 13, 2012, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court. The claimants have not petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari and their deadline to do so has expired.

13

Table of Contents

With respect to the one claim filed by a Company employee, that individual also commenced a separate action in the MDL entitled DuWayne Mason v. Seacor Marine, LLC, No. 2:11-CV-00826 (E.D. La.), in which he alleges sustaining personal injuries not only in connection with responding to the explosion and fire, but also in the months thereafter in connection with the clean-up of oil and dispersants while a member of the crew of the M/V Seacor Vanguard. Although the case is subject to the MDL Court's stay of individual proceedings, on July 16, 2012 the employee sought to sever his case from the MDL. On March 5, 2013, the Court denied the motion, and on April 2, 2013, the employee filed a motion asking the Court to reconsider. The Company filed its response opposing the employee's motion on April 30, 2013, and on May 3, 2013, the Court denied the motion.  On May 22, 2013, the employee filed a Notice of Appeal to the Fifth Circuit.  On July 24, 2013, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The Fifth Circuit granted the Company's motion to dismiss on August 16, 2013.
On July 20, 2010, two individuals purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans in the State of Louisiana, John Wunstell, Jr. and Kelly Blanchard v. BP, et al., No. 2010-7437 (Division K) (the “Wunstell Action”), in which they assert, among other theories, that Mr. Wunstell suffered injuries as a result of his exposure to certain noxious fumes and chemicals in connection with the provision of remediation, containment and response services by O'Brien's Response Management Inc. ("ORM"), a subsidiary of the Company prior to the ORM Transaction (as defined in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012). The action now is part of the overall MDL. The complaint also seeks to establish a “class-wide court-supervised medical monitoring program” for all individuals “participating in BP's Deepwater Horizon Vessels of Opportunity Program and/or Horizon Response Program” who allegedly experienced injuries similar to those of Mr. Wunstell. The Company believes this lawsuit has no merit and will continue to vigorously defend the action and pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend ORM in connection with the Wunstell Action and claims asserted in the MDL, discussed further below. Although the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter, the Company does not expect it will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
On December 15, 2010, ORM and National Response Corporation ("NRC"), subsidiaries of the Company prior to the ORM Transaction and SES Business Transaction (as defined in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012), respectively, were named as defendants in one of the several consolidated “master complaints” that have been filed in the overall MDL. The master complaint naming ORM and NRC asserts various claims on behalf of a putative class against multiple defendants concerning the clean-up activities generally, and the use of dispersants specifically. By court order, the Wunstell Action has been stayed as a result of the filing of the referenced master complaint. The Company believes that the claims asserted against ORM and NRC in the master complaint have no merit and on February 28, 2011, ORM and NRC moved to dismiss all claims against them in the master complaint on legal grounds. On September 30, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss that ORM and NRC had filed (an amended decision was issued on October 4, 2011 that corrected several grammatical errors and non-substantive oversights in the original order). Although the Court refused to dismiss the referenced master complaint in its entirety at that time, the Court did recognize the validity of the “derivative immunity” and “implied preemption” arguments that ORM and NRC advanced and directed ORM and NRC to (i) conduct limited discovery to develop evidence to support those arguments and (ii) then re-assert the arguments. The Court did, however, dismiss all state-law claims and certain other claims that had been asserted in the referenced master complaint, and dismissed the claims of all plaintiffs that have failed to allege a legally-sufficient injury. A schedule for limited discovery and motion practice was established by the Court and, in accordance with that schedule, ORM and NRC filed for summary judgment re-asserting their derivative immunity and implied preemption arguments on May 18, 2012. Those motions were argued on July 13, 2012 and are still pending decision. In addition to the indemnity provided to ORM, pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend ORM and NRC in connection with these claims in the MDL. Although the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter, the Company does not expect it will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
Subsequent to the filing of the referenced master complaint, nine additional individual civil actions have been filed in or removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana concerning the clean-up activities generally, which name the Company, ORM and/or NRC as defendants or third-party defendants and are part of the overall MDL. On April 8, 2011, ORM was named as a defendant in Johnson Bros. Corporation of Louisiana v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00781 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual business seeking damages allegedly caused by a delay on a construction project alleged to have resulted from the clean-up operations. On April 15, 2011, ORM and NRC were named as defendants in James and Krista Pearson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. ("BP Exploration"), et al., No. 2:11-CV-00863 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by a husband and wife, who allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and are seeking damages for personal injury, property damage to their boat, and amounts allegedly due under contract. On April 15, 2011, ORM and NRC were named as defendants in Thomas Edward Black v. BP Exploration, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00867 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual who is seeking damages for lost income because he allegedly could not find work in the fishing industry after the oil spill. On April 20, 2011, a complaint was filed in Darnell Alexander, et al. v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00951 (E.D. La.) on behalf of 117 individual plaintiffs that seek to adopt the allegations made in the referenced master complaint against ORM and NRC (and the other defendants). Plaintiffs in this matter

14

Table of Contents

have since been granted leave to amend their complaint to include 410 additional individual plaintiffs. On October 3, 2012, ORM and NRC were served with a Rule 14(c) Third-Party Complaint by Jambon Supplier II, L.L.C. and Jambon Marine Holdings L.L.C. in their Limitation of Liability action, In the Matter of Jambon Supplier II, L.L.C., et al., No. 2:12-CV-00426 (E.D. La.). This Third-Party Complaint alleges that if claimant David Dinwiddie, who served as a clean-up crewmember aboard the M/V JAMBON SUPPLIER II vessel during the clean-up efforts, was injured as a result of his exposure to dispersants and chemicals during the course and scope of his employment, then said injuries were caused by the third-party defendants. On November 25, 2012, ORM was named as a defendant in Victoria Sanchez v. American Pollution Control Corp. et al., No. 2:12-CV-00164 (E.D. La.), a maritime suit filed by an individual who allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and sustained personal injuries during the course of such employment. On December 17, 2012, the Court unsealed a False Claims Act lawsuit naming ORM as a defendant, Dillon v. BP, PLC et al., No. 2:12-CV-00987 (E.D. La.)., which is a suit by an individual seeking damages and penalties arising from alleged false reports and claims made to the federal government with respect to the amount of oil burned and dispersed during the clean-up. The federal government has declined to intervene in this suit. On April 8, 2013, the Company, ORM, and NRC were named as defendants in William and Dianna Fitzgerald v. BP Exploration et al., No. 2:13-CV-00650 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by a husband and wife whose son allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and became ill as a result of his exposure to oil and dispersants. Finally, on April 17, 2013, ORM was named as a defendant in Danos et al. v. BP America Production Co. et al., No. 2:13-CV-03747 (removed to E.D. La.), which is a suit by eight individuals seeking damages for dispersant exposure either as a result of their work during clean-up operations or as a result of their residence in the Gulf. By court order, all nine of these additional individual cases have been stayed until further notice. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these matters but believes they are without merit and does not expect that they will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
On February 18, 2011, Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., and Transocean Deepwater Inc. (collectively “Transocean”) named ORM and NRC as third-party defendants in a Rule 14(c) Third-Party Complaint in Transocean's own Limitation of Liability Act action, which is part of the overall MDL, tendering to ORM and NRC the claims in the referenced master complaint that have already been asserted against ORM and NRC. Transocean, Cameron International Corporation, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., and M-I L.L.C. also filed cross-claims against ORM and NRC for contribution and tort indemnity should they be found liable for any damages in Transocean's Limitation of Liability Act action and ORM and NRC have asserted counterclaims against those same parties for identical relief. Weatherford U.S., L.P. and Weatherford International, Inc. (collectively "Weatherford") had also filed cross-claims against ORM and NRC, but moved to voluntarily dismiss these cross-claims without prejudice on February 8, 2013. The Court granted Weatherford's motion that same day. As indicated above, the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these actions but believes they are without merit and does not expect that these matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
On November 16, 2012, 668 individuals who served as beach clean-up workers in Escambia County, Florida during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response commenced a civil action in the Circuit Court for the First Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Escambia County, Abney et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et al., No. 2012-CA-002947, in which they allege, among other things, that ORM and other defendants engaged in the contamination of Florida waters and beaches in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 376 and injured the plaintiffs by exposing them to dispersants during the course and scope of their employment. The case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida on January 13, 2013, Abney et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et la., No. 3:13-CV-00024 (N.D. Fla.), and on January 16, 2013, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) issued a Conditional Transfer Order (“CTO”) transferring the case to the MDL, subject to any timely-filed notice of objection from the plaintiffs. Upon receipt of a notice of objection from the plaintiffs, a briefing schedule was set by the JPML, and so a stay of proceedings and suspension of deadlines was sought and obtained by the Court in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Following briefing before the JPML, the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and consolidated with the MDL on April 2, 2013. On April 22, 2013, a companion case to this matter was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Abood et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et al., No. 3:13-CV-00284 (N.D. Fla.), which alleges identical allegations against the same parties but names an additional 174 plaintiffs, all of whom served as clean-up workers in various Florida counties during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response.  A CTO was issued by the JPML on May 2, 2013, no objection was filed by the plaintiffs, and the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and consolidated with the MDL on May 10, 2013.  By court order, both of these matters have been stayed until further notice. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these matters but believes they are without merit and does not expect that these matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
Separately, on March 2, 2012, the Court announced that BP Exploration and BP America Production Company ("BP America") (collectively "BP") and the plaintiffs had reached an agreement on the terms of two proposed class action settlements that will resolve, among other things, plaintiffs' economic loss claims and clean-up related claims against BP. The parties filed their proposed settlement agreements on April 18, 2012 along with motions seeking preliminary approval of the settlements. The Court held a hearing on April 25, 2012 to consider those motions and preliminarily approved both settlements on May 2, 2012.

15

Table of Contents

A final fairness hearing took place on November 8, 2012. The Court granted final approval to the Economic and Property Damages Class Action Settlement on December 21, 2012, and granted final approval to the Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement on January 11, 2013. Both class action settlements are currently on appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Although neither the Company, ORM, or NRC are parties to the settlement agreements, the Company, ORM, and NRC are listed as released parties on the releases accompanying both settlement agreements. As the releases for both settlements have been deemed valid and enforceable by the district court, if the Fifth Circuit affirms these decisions, class members who did not file timely requests for exclusion will be barred from pursuing economic loss, property damage, personal injury, medical monitoring, and/or other released claims against the Company, ORM, and NRC. At this time, the Company expects these settlements to reduce ORM's potential exposure, if any, from some of the pending actions described above, and continues to evaluate the settlements' impacts on these cases.
On January 29, 2013, HEPACO, LLC ("HEPACO"), served a demand for arbitration upon ORM, in which HEPACO claims that ORM owes HEPACO an additional fee of $20,291,178.92 under the parties' Management Services Agreement (“MSA”), dated June 1, 2010.  According to HEPACO, the MSA requires ORM to pay HEPACO an additional fee of 30% of total charges paid under the MSA ("Surcharge") to compensate HEPACO for U.S. Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' insurance or Jones Act insurance and related risks attendant to the work when contract requires labor to be performed over, adjoining and/or in water. ORM denies liability for the Surcharge, intends to vigorously defend against the claim, and has sought indemnity for any resulting judgment and related attorneys fees from BP America and BP Exploration. ORM has advised BP that, pursuant to the Bridge Agreement HOU-WL4-3066 between BP and ORM, effective as of June 1, 2010, under which ORM managed and oversaw, for BP, subcontractors, such as HEPACO, in connection with on-shore services related to the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill, BP ultimately is responsible for the payment of the Surcharge should HEPACO be determined to be entitled to recover it under the MSA.
ORM is defending against three collective action lawsuits, each asserting failure to pay overtime with respect to individuals who provided service on the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response (the “DPH FLSA Actions”) under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).  These cases - Dennis Prejean v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01045) (the “Prejean Action”); Baylor Singleton et. al. v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. et. al. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01716) (the “Singleton Action”); and Himmerite et al. v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. et al. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01533) (the “Himmerite Action”) - were each brought on behalf of certain individuals who worked on the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response and who were classified as independent contractors.  The Prejean, Himmerite and Singleton Actions were each filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and then subsequently consolidated with the overall MDL, in which the Himmerite and Singleton Actions were stayed pursuant to procedures of the MDL.  However, all three cases were severed from the MDL on September 19, 2013, and referred to a Magistrate Judge for pretrial case management, including issuing a scheduling order, overseeing discovery, and any other preliminary matters. The Himmerite and Singleton Actions are still pre-answer. In the Prejean Action, ORM has answered the complaint, a scheduling order has been issued, and plaintiffs have, among other things, filed a Motion for Conditional Certification, which is fully briefed and submitted. The pending Motion for Conditional Certification was referred by order dated September 19, 2013 to the Magistrate Judge for his report and recommendation.  The limitations periods for potential plaintiffs to opt-in to the Prejean, Himmerite and Singleton Actions have all been tolled pending further action by the Court.  The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from any of these DWH FLSA Actions, but believes they are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend against them.
In the course of the Company's business, it may agree to indemnify the counterparty to an agreement.  If the indemnified party makes a successful claim for indemnification, the Company would be required to reimburse that party in accordance with the terms of the indemnification agreement.  Indemnification agreements generally are subject to threshold amounts, specified claim periods and other restrictions and limitations.
In connection with the SES Business Transaction and the ORM Transaction, the Company remains contingently liable for certain indemnification obligations, including potential liabilities relating to work performed in connection with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response. In the case of the SES Business Transaction, such potential liabilities may not exceed the purchase consideration received by the Company for the SES Business Transaction and in the case of the ORM Transaction, are subject to a negotiated cap. The Company currently is indemnified under contractual agreements with BP with respect to such potential liabilities.
In the normal course of its business, the Company becomes involved in various other litigation matters including, among other things, claims by third parties for alleged property damages and personal injuries. Management has used estimates in determining the Company's potential exposure to these matters and has recorded reserves in its financial statements related thereto where appropriate. It is possible that a change in the Company's estimates of that exposure could occur, but the Company does not expect such changes in estimated costs would have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

16

Table of Contents

8.
MULTI-EMPLOYER PENSION PLANS
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company received notification from the American Maritime Officers Pension Plan (the "AMOPP”) that based on an actuarial valuation performed as of September 30, 2012, if the Company chooses to withdraw from the AMOPP, its withdrawal liability will be $45.6 million. That liability may change in future years based on various factors, primarily employee census. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has no intention to withdraw from the AMOPP and no deficit amounts have been invoiced. Depending upon the results of the future actuarial valuations and the ten-year rehabilitation plan, it is possible that the AMOPP will experience further funding deficits, requiring the Company to recognize additional payroll related operating expenses in the periods invoices are received or contribution levels are increased.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company also received notification from the United Kingdom Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund ("MNOPF") that the results of a 2012 actuarial valuation indicated that an additional net funding deficit of £120.0 million had developed since the previous actuarial valuation in 2009 and the Company's allocable share of the additional deficit was £1.7 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company received the invoice for the additional funding deficit and recognized additional payroll related operating expenses of $2.7 million. Depending upon the results of the future actuarial valuations, it is possible that the MNOPF will experience further funding deficits, requiring the Company to recognize additional payroll related operating expenses in the periods invoices are received.
9.
LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
On August 9, 2013, the Company voluntarily terminated the SEACOR revolving credit facility.
As of September 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $28.1 million with various expiration dates through 2016.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company made scheduled payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $13.1 million and had net borrowings of $4.2 million under inventory financing arrangements.
SEACOR’s Board of Directors has previously authorized the Company to purchase any or all of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2019, which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company did not repurchase any of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2019.
10.
STOCK REPURCHASES
SEACOR’s Board of Directors previously approved a securities repurchase plan that authorizes the Company to acquire shares of SEACOR common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company did not acquire any shares of Common Stock for treasury. As of September 30, 2013, the remaining authority under the repurchase plan was $100.0 million.
11.
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE OF SEACOR
Basic earnings per common share of SEACOR are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the relevant periods. Diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding plus the effect of potentially dilutive securities through the application of the treasury stock and if-converted methods. Dilutive securities for this purpose assumes restricted stock grants have vested, common shares have been issued pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock options and common shares have been issued pursuant to the conversion of all outstanding convertible notes.

17

Table of Contents

Computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR were as follows (in thousands, except share data):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Net Income Attributable to SEACOR
 
Average O/S Shares
 
Per Share
 
Net Income Attributable to SEACOR
 
Average O/S Shares
 
Per Share
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
$
30,291

 
19,964,695

 
$
1.52

 
$
38,688

 
19,843,778

 
$
1.95

Effect of Dilutive Share Awards:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Options and Restricted Stock(1)

 
436,364

 
 
 

 
354,671

 
 
Convertible Notes(2)
3,086

 
4,200,525

 
 
 

 

 
 
Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
$
33,377

 
24,601,584

 
$
1.36

 
$
38,688

 
20,198,449

 
$
1.92

2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
$
16,102

 
20,432,997

 
$
0.79

 
$
63,839

 
20,512,118

 
$
3.11

Effect of Dilutive Share Awards:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Options and Restricted Stock(1)

 
307,459

 
 
 

 
326,350

 
 
Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
$
16,102

 
20,740,456

 
$
0.78

 
$
63,839

 
20,838,468

 
$
3.06

______________________ 
(1)
For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR excluded 115,832 and 655,168 of certain share awards, respectively, as the effect of their inclusion in the computation would be anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, diluted earnings per share of SEACOR excluded 303,313 and 555,768 of certain share awards, respectively, as the effect of their inclusion in the computation would be anti-dilutive.
(2)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR excluded 4,200,525 common shares issuable pursuant to the Company's 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes as the effect of their inclusion in the computation would be anti-dilutive.
12.
SHARE BASED COMPENSATION
Transactions in connection with the Company’s share based compensation plans during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were as follows:
Director stock awards granted
2,000

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) shares issued
31,586

Restricted stock awards granted
148,300

Restricted stock awards canceled
18,000

Shares released from Deferred Compensation Plan
1,692

Stock Option Activities:
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2012
1,281,821

Granted(1)
480,762

Exercised
(278,354
)
Forfeited
(800
)
Expired
(1,576
)
Outstanding as of September 30, 2013
1,481,853

Shares available for future grants and ESPP purchases as of September 30, 2013
558,145

______________________ 
(1)
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company granted 318,012 stock options to existing option holders under make-whole provisions upon the Spin-off of Era Group.

18

Table of Contents

13.    SEGMENT INFORMATION
Accounting standards require public business enterprises to report information about each of their operating business segments that exceed certain quantitative thresholds or meet certain other reporting requirements. Operating business segments have been defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Certain reclassifications of prior period information have been made to conform to the current period's reportable segment presentation as a result of the Company's presentation of discontinued operations (see Notes 1 and 14). The Company’s basis of measurement of segment profit or loss is as previously described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The following tables summarize the operating results, capital expenditures and assets of the Company's reportable segments.
 
Offshore
Marine
Services
$’000
 
Inland
River
Services
$’000
 
Shipping
Services
$’000
 
Ethanol and
Industrial
Alcohol
$’000
 
Other
$’000
 
Corporate
and
Eliminations
$’000
 
Total
$’000
For the three months ended
September 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External customers
156,173

 
51,950

 
48,200

 
52,580

 
27,881

 

 
336,784

Intersegment
25

 
792

 

 

 

 
(817
)
 

 
156,198

 
52,742

 
48,200

 
52,580

 
27,881

 
(817
)
 
336,784

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
95,113

 
38,473

 
28,215

 
52,390

 
26,141

 
(792
)
 
239,540

Administrative and general
14,132

 
3,431

 
5,133

 
428

 
1,429

 
6,910

 
31,463

Depreciation and amortization
16,470

 
6,869

 
7,841

 
1,489

 
92

 
742

 
33,503

 
125,715

 
48,773

 
41,189

 
54,307

 
27,662

 
6,860

 
304,506

Gains on Asset Dispositions
15,343

 
783

 
3,104

 

 

 

 
19,230

Operating Income (Loss)
45,826

 
4,752

 
10,115

 
(1,727
)
 
219

 
(7,677
)
 
51,508

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative gains (losses), net
32

 

 

 
1,129

 
(380
)
 
(1,084
)
 
(303
)
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net
1,937

 
(89
)
 
6

 

 
15

 
361

 
2,230

Other, net

 

 
540

 

 
(3
)
 
(60
)
 
477

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
1,527

 
80

 
(1,413
)
 

 
36

 

 
230

Segment Profit (Loss)
49,322

 
4,743

 
9,248

 
(598
)
 
(113
)
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit (Loss)
 
(7,389
)
Less Equity Earnings (Losses) included in Segment Profit (Loss)
 
(230
)
Income Before Taxes, Equity Earnings and Discontinued Operations
 
46,523


19

Table of Contents


 
Offshore
Marine
Services
$’000
 
Inland
River
Services
$’000
 
Shipping
Services
$’000
 
Ethanol and
Industrial
Alcohol(1)(2)
$’000
 
Other
$’000
 
Corporate
and
Eliminations
$’000
 
Total
$’000
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External customers
418,815

 
148,153

 
142,779

 
146,807

 
62,857

 

 
919,411

Intersegment
77

 
2,023

 

 

 

 
(2,100
)
 

 
418,892

 
150,176

 
142,779

 
146,807

 
62,857

 
(2,100
)
 
919,411

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
282,725

 
110,055

 
84,383

 
145,837

 
59,589

 
(2,023
)
 
680,566

Administrative and general
43,194

 
11,376

 
16,434

 
1,566

 
4,408

 
24,848

 
101,826

Depreciation and amortization
49,217

 
21,031

 
23,545

 
4,467

 
287

 
2,287

 
100,834

 
375,136

 
142,462

 
124,362

 
151,870

 
64,284

 
25,112

 
883,226

Gains on Asset Dispositions
  and Impairments, Net
25,577

 
5,776

 
149

 

 
1,907

 
141

 
33,550

Operating Income (Loss)
69,333

 
13,490

 
18,566

 
(5,063
)
 
480

 
(27,071
)
 
69,735

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative gains (losses), net
357

 

 

 
1,641

 
12

 
(5,245
)
 
(3,235
)
Foreign currency losses, net
(2,160
)
 
(7
)
 
(9
)
 

 
(321
)
 
(200
)
 
(2,697
)
Other, net
11

 

 
742

 

 
51

 
(129
)
 
675

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
10,534

 
(2,306
)
 
(3,321
)
 

 
2,164

 

 
7,071

Segment Profit (Loss)
78,075

 
11,177

 
15,978

 
(3,422
)
 
2,386

 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit (Loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(11,214
)
Less Equity Earnings (Losses) included in Segment Profit (Loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(7,071
)
Income Before Taxes, Equity Earnings and Discontinued Operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
53,264

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital Expenditures
85,324

 
22,138

 
36,218

 
656

 
384

 
1,763

 
146,483

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of September 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property and Equipment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Historical cost
1,160,334

 
473,349

 
495,877

 
43,812

 
3,992

 
30,951

 
2,208,315

Accumulated depreciation
(457,454
)
 
(140,747
)
 
(216,270
)
 
(10,081
)
 
(600
)
 
(10,452
)
 
(835,604
)
 
702,880

 
332,602

 
279,607

 
33,731

 
3,392

 
20,499

 
1,372,711

Construction in progress
95,552

 
23,814

 
7,323

 
632

 
2,119

 
41

 
129,481

 
798,432

 
356,416

 
286,930

 
34,363

 
5,511

 
20,540

 
1,502,192

Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies
99,191

 
57,445

 
123,354

 

 
85,901

 

 
365,891

Inventories
6,187

 
2,277

 
1,794

 
12,856

 
2,328

 

 
25,442

Goodwill
13,367

 
2,759

 
1,852

 

 

 

 
17,978

Intangible Assets
4,116

 
8,049

 
1,002

 
29

 
387

 

 
13,583

Other current and long-term assets, excluding cash and near cash assets(3)
160,248

 
45,881

 
19,480

 
6,765

 
62,863

 
23,060

 
318,297

Segment Assets
1,081,541

 
472,827

 
434,412

 
54,013

 
156,990

 
 
 
 
Cash and near cash assets(3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
608,341

Total Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,851,724

______________________
(1)
Operating revenues includes $144.2 million of tangible product sales and operating expenses includes $143.3 million of costs of goods sold.
(2)
Inventories includes raw materials of $2.7 million and work in process of $2.1 million.
(3)
Cash and near cash assets includes cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, marketable securities, construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds.

20

Table of Contents

 
Offshore
Marine
Services
$’000
 
Inland
River
Services
$’000
 
Shipping
Services
$’000
 
Ethanol and
Industrial
Alcohol
$’000
 
Other
$’000
 
Corporate
and
Eliminations
$’000
 
Total
$’000
For the three months ended
September 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External customers
134,296

 
53,293

 
45,157

 
47,813

 
58,296

 

 
338,855

Intersegment
26

 

 

 

 
40

 
(66
)
 

 
134,322

 
53,293

 
45,157

 
47,813

 
58,336

 
(66
)
 
338,855

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
88,842

 
38,320

 
28,089

 
45,472

 
53,287

 
(5
)
 
254,005

Administrative and general
14,795

 
3,480

 
6,567

 
545

 
5,635

 
8,487

 
39,509

Depreciation and amortization
16,051

 
7,335

 
7,776

 
1,578

 
753

 
854

 
34,347

 
119,688

 
49,135

 
42,432

 
47,595

 
59,675

 
9,336

 
327,861

Gains (Losses) on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net
6,585

 
3,503

 
145

 

 
(1,169
)
 

 
9,064

Operating Income (Loss)
21,219

 
7,661

 
2,870

 
218

 
(2,508
)
 
(9,402
)
 
20,058

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative losses, net

 

 

 
(1,035
)
 
(838
)
 
(157
)
 
(2,030
)
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
717

 
33

 
8

 

 
(25
)
 
295

 
1,028

Other, net

 

 
7,145

 

 

 
(47
)
 
7,098

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
1,238

 
(2,227
)
 
(551
)
 

 
243

 

 
(1,297
)
Segment Profit (Loss)
23,174

 
5,467

 
9,472

 
(817
)
 
(3,128
)
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit (Loss)
 
(7,916
)
Less Equity Earnings (Losses) included in Segment Profit (Loss)
 
1,297

Income Before Taxes, Equity Earnings and Discontinued Operations
 
18,238


21

Table of Contents

 
Offshore
Marine
Services
$’000
 
Inland
River
Services
$’000
 
Shipping
Services
$’000
 
Ethanol and
Industrial
Alcohol(1)(2)
$’000
 
Other
$’000
 
Corporate
and
Eliminations
$’000
 
Total
$’000
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External customers
378,606

 
160,085

 
133,606

 
146,370

 
127,262

 

 
945,929

Intersegment
78

 

 
108

 

 
75

 
(261
)
 

 
378,684

 
160,085

 
133,714

 
146,370

 
127,337

 
(261
)
 
945,929

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
258,266

 
110,966

 
83,875

 
140,078

 
113,930

 
(146
)
 
706,969

Administrative and general
39,797

 
11,235

 
16,939

 
1,404

 
16,332

 
25,094

 
110,801

Depreciation and amortization
44,792

 
21,586

 
22,755

 
4,208

 
2,153

 
1,775

 
97,269

 
342,855

 
143,787

 
123,569

 
145,690

 
132,415

 
26,723

 
915,039

Gains (Losses) on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net
9,054

 
6,288

 
2,005

 

 
(1,164
)
 

 
16,183

Operating Income (Loss)
44,883

 
22,586

 
12,150

 
680

 
(6,242
)
 
(26,984
)
 
47,073

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative gains (losses), net

 

 

 
(1,756
)
 
261

 
(939
)
 
(2,434
)
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
1,486

 
(60
)
 
17

 

 
(10
)
 
232

 
1,665

Other, net
11

 

 
7,432

 

 

 
14

 
7,457

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
4,068

 
(1,538
)
 
(1,542
)
 
6,154

 
(483
)
 

 
6,659

Segment Profit (Loss)
50,448

 
20,988

 
18,057

 
5,078

 
(6,474
)
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit (Loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,086
)
Less Equity Earnings (Losses) included in Segment Profit (Loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(6,659
)
Income Before Taxes, Equity Earnings and Discontinued Operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
50,675

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital Expenditures
112,527

 
22,296

 
20,207

 

 
6,410

 
3,604

 
165,044

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of September 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property and Equipment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Historical cost
1,119,381

 
488,669

 
517,281

 
43,693

 
21,630

 
29,834

 
2,220,488

Accumulated depreciation
(412,625
)
 
(120,995
)
 
(195,494
)
 
(4,151
)
 
(3,943
)
 
(8,295
)
 
(745,503
)
 
706,756

 
367,674

 
321,787

 
39,542

 
17,687

 
21,539

 
1,474,985

Construction in progress
115,698

 
10,519

 
20,927

 

 
2,937

 
439

 
150,520

 
822,454

 
378,193

 
342,714

 
39,542

 
20,624

 
21,978

 
1,625,505

Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies
68,003

 
54,250

 
70,413

 

 
38,168

 

 
230,834

Inventories
6,249

 
2,435

 
1,533

 
8,810

 
3,329

 

 
22,356

Goodwill
13,367

 
4,345

 
1,852

 

 
37,138

 

 
56,702

Intangible Assets
4,557

 
7,996

 
1,544

 
114

 
5,720

 

 
19,931

Other current and long-term assets, excluding cash and near cash assets(3)
155,387

 
50,049

 
16,390

 
7,382

 
92,019

 
43,618

 
364,845

Segment Assets
1,070,017

 
497,268

 
434,446

 
55,848

 
196,998

 
 
 
 
Cash and near cash assets(3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
591,916

Discontinued operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,005,147

Total Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,917,236

 ______________________
(1)
Operating revenues includes $143.6 million of tangible product sales and operating expenses includes $137.3 million of costs of goods sold.
(2)
Inventories includes raw materials of $3.6 million and work in process of $1.9 million.
(3)
Cash and near cash assets includes cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, marketable securities, construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds.

22

Table of Contents

14.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Summarized selected operating results of the Company's discontinued operations were as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
SES Business
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
22,387

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 

 

 

 
18,234

Administrative and general
 

 

 

 
4,587

Depreciation and amortization
 

 

 

 
1,428

 
 

 

 

 
24,249

Losses on Asset Dispositions
 

 

 

 
(71
)
Operating Loss
 

 

 

 
(1,933
)
Other Income (Expense), Net (including gain on sale of business)
 

 

 
(1,537
)
 
24,971

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit
 

 

 
538

 
(4,305
)
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies
 

 

 

 
302

Net Income (Loss)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(999
)
 
$
19,035

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SEI
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues
 
$

 
$
76,296

 
$

 
$
392,614

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 

 
71,789

 

 
382,589

Administrative and general
 

 
613

 

 
3,749

Depreciation and amortization
 

 
1

 

 
(3
)
 
 

 
72,403

 

 
386,335

Operating Income
 


3,893

 

 
6,279

Other Income (Expense), Net (including gain on sale of business)
 

 
(2,545
)
 
(143
)
 
(2,540
)
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit
 

 
(608
)
 
50

 
(1,711
)
Net Income (Loss)
 
$

 
$
740

 
$
(93
)
 
$
2,028

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Era Group
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues
 
$

 
$
77,989

 
$
22,892

 
$
202,026

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 

 
46,235

 
14,076

 
124,913

Administrative and general
 

 
10,338

 
2,653

 
27,210

Depreciation and amortization
 

 
10,937

 
3,875

 
31,031

 
 

 
67,510

 
20,604

 
183,154

Gains on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net
 

 
613

 
548

 
3,455

Operating Income
 

 
11,092

 
2,836

 
22,327

Other Income (Expense), Net
 

 
(2,819
)
 
(1,316
)
 
(5,955
)
Income Tax (Expense)
 

 
(2,967
)
 
(704
)
 
(5,737
)
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies
 

 
219

 
65

 
(5,444
)
Net Income
 
$

 
$
5,525

 
$
881

 
$
5,191

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Eliminations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues
 
$

 
$
(31,082
)
 
$

 
$
(86,206
)
Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 

 
(31,082
)
 

 
(86,204
)
Administrative and general
 

 

 

 
(2
)
 
 

 
(31,082
)
 

 
(86,206
)
Operating Income
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$


23

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements discussed in this release as well as in other reports, materials and oral statements that the Company releases from time to time to the public constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Generally, words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” “plan,” “target,” “forecast” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements concern management's expectations, strategic objectives, business prospects, anticipated economic performance and financial condition and other similar matters. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual events or results may differ significantly from these statements. Actual events or results are subject to significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors, including decreased demand and loss of revenues as a result of U.S. government implemented moratoriums directing operators to cease certain drilling activities and any extension of such moratoriums (the “Moratoriums”), weakening demand for the Company’s services as a result of unplanned customer suspensions, cancellations, rate reductions or non-renewals of vessel charters or failures to finalize commitments to charter vessels in response to Moratoriums, increased government legislation and regulation of the Company’s businesses could increase cost of operations, increased competition if the Jones Act is repealed, liability, legal fees and costs in connection with the provision of emergency response services, including the Company’s involvement in response to the oil spill as a result of the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon in April 2010, decreased demand for the Company’s services as a result of declines in the global economy, declines in valuations in the global financial markets and a lack of liquidity in the credit sectors, including, interest rate fluctuations, availability of credit, inflation rates, change in laws, trade barriers, commodity prices and currency exchange fluctuations, the cyclical nature of the oil and gas industry, activity in foreign countries and changes in foreign political, military and economic conditions, changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration and production activity, safety record requirements related to Offshore Marine Services and Shipping Services, decreased demand for Shipping Services due to construction of additional refined petroleum product, natural gas or crude oil pipelines or due to decreased demand for refined petroleum products, crude oil or chemical products or a change in existing methods of delivery, compliance with U.S. and foreign government laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations, the dependence of Offshore Marine Services and Shipping Services on several customers, consolidation of the Company's customer base, the ongoing need to replace aging vessels, industry fleet capacity, restrictions imposed by the Shipping Acts on the amount of foreign ownership of the Company's Common Stock, operational risks of Offshore Marine Services, Inland River Services and Shipping Services, effects of adverse weather conditions and seasonality, the level of grain export volume, the effect of fuel prices on barge towing costs, variability in freight rates for inland river barges, the effect of international economic and political factors in Inland River Services' operations, sudden and unexpected changes in commodity prices, futures and options, global weather conditions, political instability, changes in currency exchanges rates, and product availability in agriculture commodity trading and logistics activities, adequacy of insurance coverage, the attraction and retention of qualified personnel by the Company, and various other matters and factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control as well as those discussed in Item 1A (Risk Factors) of the Company's Annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, these statements constitute the Company's cautionary statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. It should be understood that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, the preceding should not be considered to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the document in which they are made. The Company disclaims any obligation or undertaking to provide any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in the Company's expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which the forward-looking statement is based, except as required by law. The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect the Company’s businesses, particularly those mentioned under “Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7 on the Company’s Form 10-K and SEACOR’s periodic reporting on Form 8-K (if any), which are incorporated by reference.

Overview
The Company’s operations are divided into four main business segments – Offshore Marine Services, Inland River Services, Shipping Services, and Ethanol and Industrial Alcohol. The Company also has activities that are referred to and described under Other that primarily includes Emergency and Crisis Services, Agricultural Commodity Trading and Logistics, various other investments in 50% or less owned companies and lending and leasing activities.
Discontinued Operations. On January 31, 2013, the Company completed the spin-off ("Spin-off") of Era Group Inc. (“Era Group”), the company that operated SEACOR's Aviation Services business segment, by means of a dividend to SEACOR's stockholders of all the issued and outstanding common stock of Era Group. Era Group filed a Registration Statement on Form 10 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, describing the Spin-off, that was declared effective on January 14, 2013. Era Group is now an independent company whose common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "ERA." Discontinued operations includes the historical financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Era Group as well as the

24

Table of Contents

operations previously reported as discontinued in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Consolidated Results of Operations
The sections below provide an analysis of the Company’s operations by business segment for the three months (“Current Year Quarter”) and nine months ("Current Nine Months") ended September 30, 2013, compared with the three months (“Prior Year Quarter”) and nine months ("Prior Nine Months") ended September 30, 2012. See “Item 1. Financial Statements—Note 13. Segment Information” included in Part I for consolidating segment tables for each period presented.
Offshore Marine Services
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States, primarily U.S. Gulf of Mexico
75,356

 
48
 
60,408

 
45
 
205,803

 
49

 
161,563

 
43
Africa, primarily West Africa
17,259

 
11
 
16,353

 
12
 
48,636

 
12

 
49,626

 
13
Middle East
13,383

 
9
 
12,489

 
9
 
37,683

 
9

 
37,559

 
10
Brazil, Mexico, Central and South America
14,663

 
9
 
11,236

 
9
 
35,167

 
8

 
41,056

 
11
Europe, primarily North Sea
26,498

 
17
 
26,999

 
20
 
74,694

 
18

 
76,673

 
20
Asia
9,039

 
6
 
6,837

 
5
 
16,909

 
4

 
12,207

 
3
 
156,198

 
100
 
134,322

 
100
 
418,892

 
100

 
378,684

 
100
Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Personnel
50,753

 
33
 
46,798

 
35
 
141,494

 
34

 
130,453

 
35
Repairs and maintenance
11,562

 
7
 
14,069

 
11
 
37,711

 
9

 
39,204

 
10
Drydocking
9,017

 
6
 
4,343

 
3
 
35,045

 
8

 
20,482

 
6
Insurance and loss reserves
4,421

 
3
 
4,505

 
3
 
12,211

 
3

 
12,701

 
3
Fuel, lubes and supplies
7,883

 
5
 
8,386

 
6
 
22,289

 
5

 
22,156

 
6
Leased-in equipment
6,714

 
4
 
5,458

 
4
 
20,225

 
5

 
16,341

 
4
Brokered vessel activity
46

 
 
53

 
 
46

 

 
585

 
Other
4,717

 
3
 
5,230

 
4
 
13,704

 
3

 
16,344

 
4
 
95,113

 
61
 
88,842

 
66
 
282,725

 
67

 
258,266

 
68
Administrative and general
14,132

 
9
 
14,795

 
11
 
43,194

 
10

 
39,797

 
11
Depreciation and amortization
16,470

 
10
 
16,051

 
12
 
49,217

 
12

 
44,792

 
12
 
125,715

 
80
 
119,688

 
89
 
375,136

 
89

 
342,855

 
91
Gains on Asset Dispositions
15,343

 
10
 
6,585

 
5
 
25,577

 
6

 
9,054

 
2
Operating Income
45,826

 
30
 
21,219

 
16
 
69,333

 
17

 
44,883

 
11
Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative income, net
32

 
 

 
 
357

 

 

 
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
1,937

 
1
 
717

 
 
(2,160
)
 
(1
)
 
1,486

 
Other, net

 
 

 
 
11

 

 
11

 
Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
1,527

 
1
 
1,238

 
1
 
10,534

 
3

 
4,068

 
1
Segment Profit
49,322

 
32
 
23,174

 
17
 
78,075

 
19

 
50,448

 
12

25

Table of Contents

Operating Revenues by Type. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of operating revenues earned by type.
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Time charter:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States, primarily U.S. Gulf of Mexico
71,810

 
46
 
56,535

 
42
 
196,175

 
47

 
151,657

 
40
Africa, primarily West Africa
16,957

 
11
 
16,122

 
12
 
46,800

 
11

 
48,291

 
13
Middle East
11,447

 
7
 
10,796

 
8
 
33,010

 
8

 
32,152

 
9
Brazil, Mexico, Central and South America
12,942

 
8
 
9,625

 
7
 
29,166

 
7

 
35,256

 
9
Europe, primarily North Sea
25,750

 
17
 
26,927

 
20
 
73,375

 
18

 
76,208

 
20
Asia
7,741

 
5
 
6,439

 
5
 
14,753

 
3

 
11,731

 
3
Total time charter
146,647

 
94
 
126,444

 
94
 
393,279

 
94

 
355,295

 
94
Bareboat charter
901

 
1
 
867

 
1
 
2,665

 
1

 
2,273

 
1
Brokered vessel activity

 
 
55

 
 
(1
)
 

 
543

 
Other marine services
8,650

 
5
 
6,956

 
5
 
22,949

 
5

 
20,573

 
5
 
156,198

 
100
 
134,322

 
100
 
418,892

 
100

 
378,684

 
100


26

Table of Contents

Time Charter Operating Data. The table below sets forth the average rates per day worked, utilization and available days data for each group of Offshore Marine Services’ vessels operating under time charters for the periods indicated. The rate per day worked is the ratio of total time charter revenues to the aggregate number of days worked. Utilization is the ratio of aggregate number of days worked to total calendar days available for work. Available days represents the total calendar days during which owned and chartered-in vessels are operated by the Company.
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Rates Per Day Worked:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anchor handling towing supply
$
29,008

 
$
22,794

 
$
26,460

 
$
26,526

Crew
8,553

 
7,267

 
7,960

 
7,392

Mini-supply
8,048

 
7,735

 
7,817

 
7,516

Standby safety
9,922

 
9,806

 
9,729

 
9,572

Supply
17,541

 
16,567

 
16,469

 
15,904

Towing supply
10,970

 
8,265

 
9,809

 
9,062

Specialty
37,121

 
26,195

 
27,477

 
18,146

Overall Average Rates Per Day Worked
  (excluding liftboats and wind farm utility)
14,128

 
11,511

 
12,871

 
12,001

Liftboats
25,001

 
19,830

 
22,098

 
18,738

Overall Average Rates Per Day Worked
  (excluding wind farm utility)
15,677

 
12,718

 
14,055

 
12,639

Wind farm utility
2,315

 
2,882

 
2,260

 
2,717

Overall Average Rates Per Day Worked
12,454

 
10,552

 
11,390

 
10,460

Utilization:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anchor handling towing supply
75
%
 
57
%
 
74
%
 
66
%
Crew
88
%
 
94
%
 
90
%
 
86
%
Mini-supply
96
%
 
88
%
 
88
%
 
94
%
Standby safety
88
%
 
89
%
 
87
%
 
88
%
Supply
75
%
 
77
%
 
76
%
 
79
%
Towing supply
83
%
 
54
%
 
87
%
 
50
%
Specialty
58
%
 
59
%
 
45
%
 
55
%
Overall Fleet Utilization
  (excluding liftboats and wind farm utility)
83
%
 
82
%
 
83
%
 
80
%
Liftboats
82
%
 
82
%
 
72
%
 
76
%
Overall Fleet Utilization
(excluding wind farm utility)
83
%
 
82
%
 
81
%
 
80
%
Wind farm utility
95
%
 
96
%
 
90
%
 
92
%
Overall Fleet Utilization
86
%
 
85
%
 
83
%
 
82
%
Available Days:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anchor handling towing supply
1,564

 
1,564

 
4,641

 
4,658

Crew
2,844

 
3,233

 
8,961

 
9,872

Mini-supply
552

 
644

 
1,747

 
1,918

Standby safety
2,208

 
2,208

 
6,552

 
6,678

Supply
1,564

 
1,631

 
4,683

 
4,985

Towing supply
184

 
184

 
546

 
908

Specialty
327

 
276

 
1,051

 
822

Overall Fleet Available Days
  (excluding liftboats and wind farm utility)
9,243

 
9,740

 
28,181

 
29,841

Liftboats
1,543

 
1,656

 
4,777

 
3,312

Overall Fleet Available Days
  (excluding wind farm utility)
10,786

 
11,396

 
32,958

 
33,153

Wind farm utility
2,978

 
2,760

 
8,657

 
8,137

Overall Fleet Available Days
13,764

 
14,156

 
41,615

 
41,290



27

Table of Contents

Current Year Quarter compared with Prior Year Quarter
Operating Revenues. Operating revenues were $21.9 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Time charter revenues were $20.2 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Excluding the contribution of the wind farm utility vessels, overall fleet utilization was 83% compared with 82% in the Prior Year Quarter and average rates were $15,677 per day compared with $12,718 per day in the Prior Year Quarter. The number of days available for charter was 10,786 compared with 11,396 in the Prior Year Quarter, a 610 day or 5% reduction.
In the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, time charter revenues were $15.3 million higher, of which $12.0 million was due to higher average day rates. Net fleet additions and the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions increased time charter revenues by $3.7 million and $1.3 million respectively. Lower utilization decreased time charter revenues by $1.7 million. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had no vessels cold-stacked in this region compared with three as of September 30, 2012.
In Africa, time charter revenues were $0.8 million higher, of which $0.1 million was due to improved utilization and $0.7 million was due to higher average day rates.
In the Middle East, time charter revenues were $0.7 million higher. Time charter revenues were $1.0 million higher due to improved utilization and $0.1 million higher due to higher average day rates. The repositioning of vessels between geographic regions and fleet dispositions decreased time charter revenues by $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
In Brazil, Mexico, Central and South America, time charter revenues were $3.3 million higher. Higher average day rates, fleet additions, and vessels that were repositioned into the region increased time charter revenues by $0.3 million, $2.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively. Lower utilization decreased time charter revenues by $2.5 million.
In Europe, excluding the wind farm utility vessels, time charter revenues were $0.2 million lower. Higher average day rates increased time charter revenues by $0.6 million. Lower utilization and unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates decreased time charter revenues by $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Time charter revenues for the wind farm utility vessels were $1.0 million lower. Lower average day rates, lower utilization and unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates decreased time charter revenues by $1.3 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. These decreases were partially offset by fleet acquisitions, which increased time charter revenues by $0.5 million.
In Asia, time charter revenues were $1.3 million higher. Time charter revenues were $1.7 million higher due to higher average day rates and $0.4 million lower due to a reduction in utilization.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses were $6.3 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Personnel costs were $4.0 million higher primarily due to the recognition in the Current Year Quarter of a $2.7 million charge for the Company’s share of a funding deficit arising from the March 2012 actuarial valuation of the United Kingdom Merchant Navy Officers’ Pension Fund. Routine repairs and maintenance expenditure was $2.5 million lower primarily due to reduced expenditure in Africa, Europe and the Middle East. Drydocking expenses were $4.7 million higher primarily due to an increase in drydocking activity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Europe. Fuel, lube and supply expenses were $0.5 million lower primarily due to a decrease in fuel consumption related to vessel repositioning between geographic regions. Leased-in equipment expense was $1.3 million higher primarily due to the expiration of amortized deferred gains upon the extension of leases for vessels previously sold and leased back.
Gains on Asset Dispositions. During the Current Year Quarter, the Company sold six offshore support vessels and other equipment for net proceeds of $42.2 million and gains of $15.3 million. During the Prior Year Quarter, the Company sold equipment for net proceeds of $1.5 million and gains of $1.5 million, and recognized previously deferred gains of $5.1 million.
Operating Income. Excluding the impact of gains on asset dispositions and the impact of brokered vessel activity, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 20% in the Current Year Quarter compared with 11% in the Prior Year Quarter. The increase was primarily due to the improvement in operating revenues in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Brazil, Mexico and Central and South America, as noted above.
Current Nine Months compared with Prior Nine Months
Operating Revenues. Operating revenues were $40.2 million higher in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months. Time charter revenues were $38.0 million higher in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months. The Current Nine Months results included a full nine months contribution from the Company’s liftboat fleet that was acquired on March 30, 2012. During the first quarter of the Current Year, the liftboats contributed $20.8 million of operating revenues, of which $19.3 million was time charter revenues with an average day rate of $18,573 per day and a utilization rate of 64%.
Excluding the contribution of the wind farm utility vessels, overall fleet utilization was 81% compared with 80% in the Prior Nine Months and average rates were $14,055 per day compared with $12,639 per day in the Prior Nine Months. The number of days available for charter was 32,958 compared with 33,153 in the Prior Nine Months, a 195 day or 1% reduction.

28

Table of Contents

In the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, time charter revenues were $44.5 million higher, of which $19.3 million was due to the contribution of the liftboat fleet during the first quarter of the Current Year. Time charter revenues were $0.2 million higher due to improved utilization, $18.4 million higher due to an increase in average day rates, and $13.0 million higher due to the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions. Time charter revenues were $5.5 million lower due to the net effect of cold-stacking vessels, primarily two anchor handling towing supply vessels, and 0.9 million lower due to net fleet dispositions and other changes in fleet mix. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had no vessels cold-stacked in this region compared with three as of September 30, 2012.
In Africa, time charter revenues were $1.5 million lower, of which $1.3 million was due to reduced utilization and $0.2 million was due to a decrease in average day rates.
In the Middle East, time charter revenues were $0.9 million higher. Time charter revenues were $0.7 million higher due to improved utilization and $0.5 million higher due to higher average day rates. The repositioning of vessels between geographic regions decreased time charter revenues by $0.3 million.
In Brazil, Mexico, Central and South America, time charter revenues were $6.1 million lower. Time charter revenues were $5.7 million lower due to lower utilization and $4.4 million lower due to the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions. Higher average day rates and net fleet additions increased time charter revenues by $0.6 million and $3.4 million respectively.
In Europe, excluding the wind farm utility vessels, time charter revenues were $0.2 million lower. Time charter revenues were $1.9 million higher due to increased average day rates. Fleet dispositions, reduced utilization and unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates reduced time charter revenues by $0.7 million, $0.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Time charter revenues for the wind farm utility vessels were $2.6 million lower. Lower average day rates, lower utilization and unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates decreased time charter revenues by $2.9 million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively. These decreases were partially offset by fleet acquisitions, which increased time charter revenues by $1.0 million.
In Asia, time charter revenues were $3.0 million higher, of which $0.9 million was due to improved utilization and $2.1 million was due to higher average day rates.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses were $24.5 million higher in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months, of which $16.4 million was attributable to the liftboat fleet during the first quarter of the Current Year.
Excluding the impact of the liftboat fleet during the first quarter of the current year, operating expenses were $8.1 million higher during the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months. Personnel expenses were $4.4 million higher primarily due to the recognition in the Current Nine Months of a $2.7 million charge for the Company’s share of a funding deficit arising from the March 2012 actuarial valuation of the United Kingdom Merchant Navy Officers’ Pension Fund, and increased seafarer compensation costs. Repair and maintenance expenses were $3.8 million lower primarily due to reduced expenditure in Europe and the Middle East. Drydocking expenses were $9.7 million higher primarily due to an increase in drydocking activity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, Africa and Europe. Insurance and loss reserves expense was $1.8 million lower, primarily due to net fleet dispositions and lower loss reserves. Fuel, lube and supply expenses were $1.0 million lower primarily due to a decrease in fuel consumption related to vessel repositioning between geographic regions. Leased-in equipment expense was $3.9 million higher primarily due to the expiration of amortized deferred gains upon the extension of leases for vessels previously sold and leased back. Other operating expenses were $2.8 million lower primarily due to the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions.
Administrative and General. Administrative and general expenses were $3.4 million higher in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months, of which $1.1 million was attributable to the liftboat business and $1.1 million was related to higher wage and benefit costs.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $4.4 million higher in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months primarily due to the acquisition of the liftboat fleet on March 30, 2012.
Gains on Asset Dispositions. During the Current Nine Months, the Company sold 14 offshore support vessels and other equipment for net proceeds of $117.4 million and gains of $25.5 million and recognized previously deferred gains of $0.1 million. During the Prior Nine Months, the Company sold four offshore support vessels and other equipment for net proceeds of $52.1 million and gains of $10.6 million, of which $3.3 million were recognized currently and $7.3 million were deferred. In addition, during the Prior Nine Months the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $5.7 million.
Operating Income. Excluding the impact of gains on asset dispositions and the impact of brokered vessel activity, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 11% in the Current Nine Months compared with 9% in the Prior Nine Months. The increase was primarily due to improved results in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.

29

Table of Contents

Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax. Equity in earnings of 50% or less owned companies, net of tax, increased by $6.5 million in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months. During the Current Nine Months, the Company acquired a 100% controlling interest in its C-Lift 50% or less owned company through the acquisition of its partner's 50% interest and recognized a $4.2 million gain, net of tax, included in equity in earnings of 50% or less owned companies upon marking its investment to fair value. In addition, during the Current Nine Months, equity in earnings, net of tax, in the Company’s Mexican 50% or less owned company increased by $2.8 million.
Fleet Count
The composition of Offshore Marine Services’ fleet as of September 30 was as follows: 
 
Owned
 
Joint
Ventured
 
Leased-in
 
Pooled or
Managed
 
Total
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anchor handling towing supply
14

 
1

 
3

 

 
18

Crew
26

 
7

 
7

 
3

 
43

Mini-supply
4

 
2

 
2

 

 
8

Standby safety
24

 
1

 

 

 
25

Supply
9

 
4

 
9

 
4

 
26

Towing supply
2

 
1

 

 

 
3

Liftboats
15

 

 

 

 
15

Specialty
3

 
5

 

 
4

 
12

Wind farm utility
32

 

 
1

 

 
33

 
129

 
21

 
22

 
11

 
183

2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anchor handling towing supply
14

 
2

 
3

 

 
19

Crew
31

 
7

 
7

 
3

 
48

Mini-supply
5

 
2

 
2

 

 
9

Standby safety
24

 
1

 

 

 
25

Supply
10

 
2

 
9

 
4

 
25

Towing supply
2

 
1

 

 

 
3

Liftboats(1)
18

 
2

 

 

 
20

Specialty
3

 
3

 

 
3

 
9

Wind farm utility
29

 

 
1

 

 
30

 
136

 
20

 
22

 
10

 
188

______________________ 
(1)
On March 30, 2012, Offshore Marine Services acquired 18 liftboats, real property and working capital from Superior Energy Inc. for $142.5 million.

30

Table of Contents

Inland River Services
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
52,464

 
99

 
52,879

 
99

 
149,010

 
99

 
159,256

 
99

Foreign
278

 
1

 
414

 
1

 
1,166

 
1

 
829

 
1

 
52,742

 
100

 
53,293

 
100

 
150,176

 
100

 
160,085

 
100

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Barge logistics
20,869

 
40

 
21,514

 
40

 
57,387

 
38

 
64,791

 
40

Personnel
5,949

 
11

 
5,619

 
11

 
17,781

 
12

 
16,554

 
10

Repairs and maintenance
1,678

 
3

 
2,099

 
4

 
5,447

 
4

 
4,763

 
3

Insurance and loss reserves
880

 
2

 
1,122

 
2

 
2,727

 
2

 
2,680

 
2

Fuel, lubes and supplies
1,243

 
2

 
1,525

 
3

 
4,279

 
3

 
4,747

 
3

Leased-in equipment
4,260

 
8

 
3,057

 
6

 
11,455

 
8

 
9,210

 
6

Other
3,594

 
7

 
3,384

 
6

 
10,979

 
7

 
8,221

 
5

 
38,473

 
73

 
38,320

 
72

 
110,055

 
74

 
110,966

 
69

Administrative and general
3,431

 
6

 
3,480

 
6

 
11,376

 
7

 
11,235

 
7

Depreciation and amortization
6,869

 
13

 
7,335

 
14

 
21,031

 
14

 
21,586

 
14

 
48,773

 
92

 
49,135

 
92

 
142,462

 
95

 
143,787

 
90

Gains on Asset Dispositions
783

 
1

 
3,503

 
6

 
5,776

 
4

 
6,288

 
4

Operating Income
4,752

 
9

 
7,661

 
14

 
13,490

 
9

 
22,586

 
14

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
(89
)
 

 
33

 

 
(7
)
 

 
(60
)
 

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less
  Owned Companies, Net of Tax
80

 

 
(2,227
)
 
(4
)
 
(2,306
)
 
(2
)
 
(1,538
)
 
(1
)
Segment Profit
4,743

 
9

 
5,467

 
10

 
11,177

 
7

 
20,988

 
13

Operating Revenues by Service Line. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, operating revenues earned by service line.
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dry cargo barge pools
22,952

 
44

 
25,438

 
48

 
61,884

 
41

 
76,190

 
48

Charter-out of dry cargo barges
1,466

 
3

 
1,817

 
3

 
4,418

 
3

 
5,959

 
4

Liquid unit tow operations
10,612

 
20

 
9,431

 
18

 
31,744

 
21

 
27,914

 
17

10,000 barrel liquid tank barge operations
6,071

 
11

 
4,466

 
8

 
17,756

 
12

 
14,854

 
9

Terminal operations
4,734

 
9

 
5,204

 
10

 
14,022

 
9

 
15,658

 
10

Fleeting operations
4,911

 
9

 
5,064

 
9

 
14,894

 
10

 
14,394

 
9

Inland river towboat operations and other activities
4,692

 
9

 
4,719

 
9

 
14,748

 
10

 
14,042

 
9

Inland river eliminations
(2,696
)
 
(5
)
 
(2,846
)
 
(5
)
 
(9,290
)
 
(6
)
 
(8,926
)
 
(6
)
 
52,742

 
100

 
53,293

 
100

 
150,176

 
100

 
160,085

 
100



31

Table of Contents

 Dry Cargo Barge Pools Operating Data. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, Inland River Services’ interest in tons moved and its available barge days in the dry cargo barge pools. Available barge days represents the total calendar days during which the Company’s owned and chartered-in barges were in the pool.
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
Tons
 
%
 
Tons
 
%
 
Tons
 
%
 
Tons
 
%
Tons Moved (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Grain
1,081

 
70
 
1,078

 
71
 
2,428

 
60
 
2,843

 
66
Non-Grain
456

 
30
 
438

 
29
 
1,622

 
40
 
1,470

 
34
 
1,537

 
100
 
1,516

 
100
 
4,050

 
100
 
4,313

 
100
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Days
 
 
 
Days
 
 
 
Days
 
 
 
Days
 
 
Available barge days
52,015

 
 
 
53,066

 
 
 
156,030

 
 
 
155,360

 
 
Current Year Quarter compared with Prior Year Quarter
Operating Revenues. Operating revenues were $0.6 million lower in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Operating revenues were $2.5 million lower for the dry cargo barge pools primarily due to lower freight rates. Operating revenues were $0.4 million lower for the charter-out of dry cargo barges primarily due to dry cargo barges coming off charter and being placed into the dry cargo barge pools. Operating revenues were $1.2 million higher and $1.6 million higher for the liquid unit tow and 10,000 barrel liquid tank barge operations, respectively, primarily due to higher demand and the placement of additional equipment in service. Operating revenues were $0.5 million lower for terminal operations primarily due to reduced throughput at the Company's high-speed multi-modal liquid terminal following its conversion to accommodate crude oil transfer and storage.
Operating Expenses.  Operating expenses were $0.2 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter primarily due to increased activity in the liquid unit tow operations.  
Gains on Asset Dispositions.  During the Current Year Quarter, the Company sold equipment for net proceeds of $0.1 million and gains of $0.1 million and recognized previously deferred gains of $0.7 million. During the Prior Year Quarter, the Company sold nine inland river dry cargo barges, one towboat and other equipment for net proceeds of $4.3 million and gains of $2.8 million.  In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $0.7 million. 
Operating Income. Excluding the impact of gains on asset dispositions, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 8% in the Current Year Quarter and Prior Year Quarter.
Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax. During the Prior Year Quarter, the Company recognized $2.2 million of equity in losses of 50% or less owned companies, net of tax, primarily from its Argentinian 50% or less owned company as a result of difficult operating conditions and provisions for uncertain insurance recoveries.
Current Nine Months compared with Prior Nine Months
Operating Revenues. Operating revenues were $9.9 million lower in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months. Operating revenues were $14.3 million lower for the dry cargo barge pools primarily due to weaker demand for barge freight in the Current Nine Months as a result of drought conditions throughout 2012 that impacted crop yields. Operating revenues were $1.5 million lower for the charter-out of dry cargo barges primarily due to dry cargo barges coming off charter and being placed into the dry cargo barge pool. Operating revenues were $3.8 million higher and $2.9 million higher for the liquid unit tow and 10,000 barrel liquid tank barge operations, respectively, primarily due to higher demand and the placement of additional equipment in service. Operating revenues were $1.6 million lower for terminal operations primarily due to reduced throughput at the Company's high-speed multi-modal liquid terminal following its conversion to accommodate crude oil transfer and storage.
Operating Expenses.  Operating expenses were $1.0 million lower in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months primarily due to lower barge logistics expenses as a result of the decreased activity in the dry cargo barge pools partially offset by higher repair and maintenance expenses and higher leased-in equipment expenses due to additional equipment for liquid unit tow operations.  Other expenses were higher primarily due to costs associated with regulatory inspections for certain liquid unit tow equipment. 
Gains on Asset Dispositions.  During the Current Nine Months, the Company sold 16 inland river dry cargo barges and eight inland river 30,000 barrel liquid tank barges and other equipment for proceeds of $27.4 million and gains of $6.0 million, of which $3.7 million were recognized currently and $2.4 million were deferred.  In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $2.1 million.

32

Table of Contents

During the Prior Year Nine Months, the Company sold nine dry cargo barges, two towboats and other equipment for net proceeds of $9.5 million and gains of $4.2 million. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $2.1million. 
Operating Income. Excluding the impact of gains on asset dispositions, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 5% in the Current Nine Months compared with 10% in the Prior Nine Months. The decrease in the Current Nine Months was primarily due to the reductions in operating revenues for the dry cargo barge pools and terminal operations partially offset by improved results from liquid unit tow operations.
Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax. During the Current Nine Months, the Company recognized equity in losses of 50% or less owned companies of $2.3 million, net of tax, primarily due to losses from the Company's grain terminal 50% or less owned company as a result of start-up costs in the first part of the year and lower than anticipated volume associated with the drought of 2012. During the Prior Nine Months, the Company recognized $1.5 million of equity in losses of 50% or less owned companies, net of tax, primarily from its Argentinian 50% or less owned company as a result of difficult operating conditions and provisions for uncertain insurance recoveries.
Fleet Count
The composition of Inland River Services’ fleet as of September 30 was as follows: 
 
Owned
 
Joint
Ventured
 
Leased-in
 
Pooled or
Managed
 
Total
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inland river dry cargo barges
667

 
172

 
2

 
568

 
1,409

Inland river liquid tank barges
65

 

 
8

 
2

 
75

Inland river deck barges
20

 

 

 

 
20

Inland river towboats:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4,000 hp - 6,250 hp
3

 
13

 

 

 
16

3,300 hp - 3,900 hp
1

 

 

 

 
1

Less than 3,200 hp
12

 
2

 

 

 
14

Dry cargo vessel(1)

 
1

 

 

 
1

 
768

 
188

 
10

 
570

 
1,536

2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inland river dry cargo barges
683

 
172

 
2

 
587

 
1,444

Inland river liquid tank barges
73

 

 

 
7

 
80

Inland river deck barges
20

 

 

 

 
20

Inland river towboats:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4,000 hp - 6,250 hp
3

 
13

 

 

 
16

3,300 hp - 3,900 hp
1

 

 

 

 
1

Less than 3,200 hp
12

 
2

 

 

 
14

Dry cargo vessel(1)

 
1

 

 

 
1

 
792

 
188

 
2

 
594

 
1,576

 ______________________
(1)
Argentine-flag.

33

Table of Contents

Shipping Services
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
41,259

 
86

 
33,475

 
74

 
120,228

 
84

 
98,820

 
74

Foreign
6,941

 
14

 
11,682

 
26

 
22,551

 
16

 
34,894

 
26

 
48,200

 
100

 
45,157

 
100

 
142,779

 
100

 
133,714

 
100

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Personnel
8,694

 
18

 
8,284

 
18

 
25,729

 
18

 
24,489

 
18

Repairs and maintenance
2,461

 
5

 
2,615

 
6

 
7,476

 
5

 
8,730

 
7

Drydocking
2,846

 
6

 
2,368

 
5

 
8,309

 
6

 
4,868

 
4

Insurance and loss reserves
1,161

 
2

 
809

 
2

 
2,899

 
2

 
3,183

 
2

Fuel, lubes and supplies
3,982

 
8

 
4,192

 
9

 
12,652

 
9

 
13,078

 
10

Leased-in equipment
4,454

 
9

 
4,641

 
10

 
13,706

 
10

 
13,780

 
10

Other
4,617

 
10

 
5,180

 
12

 
13,612

 
9

 
15,747

 
12

 
28,215

 
58

 
28,089

 
62

 
84,383

 
59

 
83,875

 
63

Administrative and general
5,133

 
11

 
6,567

 
15

 
16,434

 
12

 
16,939

 
13

Depreciation and amortization
7,841

 
16

 
7,776

 
17

 
23,545

 
17

 
22,755

 
17

 
41,189

 
85

 
42,432

 
94

 
124,362

 
88

 
123,569

 
93

Gains on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net
3,104

 
6

 
145

 

 
149

 

 
2,005

 
2

Operating Income
10,115

 
21

 
2,870

 
6

 
18,566

 
12

 
12,150

 
9

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
6

 

 
8

 

 
(9
)
 

 
17

 

Other, net
540

 
1

 
7,145

 
16

 
742

 
1

 
7,432

 
6

Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
(1,413
)
 
(3
)
 
(551
)
 
(1
)
 
(3,321
)
 
(2
)
 
(1,542
)
 
(1
)
Segment Profit
9,248

 
19

 
9,472

 
21

 
15,978

 
11

 
18,057

 
14

Operating Revenues by Line of Service. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of operating revenues earned from charter arrangements.
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Petroleum Transportation:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Time charter
13,271

 
28
 
9,883

 
22
 
34,267

 
24
 
27,683

 
21
Bareboat charter
8,744

 
18
 
8,744

 
19
 
25,946

 
18
 
26,041

 
19
Harbor towing and bunkering
17,971

 
37
 
17,891

 
40
 
56,195

 
40
 
54,548

 
41
Short-sea and liner transportation
8,094

 
17
 
8,533

 
19
 
26,016

 
18
 
25,133

 
19
Technical management services
120

 
 
106

 
 
355

 
 
309

 
 
48,200

 
100
 
45,157

 
100
 
142,779

 
100
 
133,714

 
100

34

Table of Contents

Operating Revenues. Operating Revenues were $3.0 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Operating revenues from petroleum transportation were $3.4 million higher primarily due to an increase in time charter rates for three of the Company’s U.S.-flag product tankers partially offset by a $0.4 million reduction in short-sea and liner transportation operating revenues primarily due to lower cargo shipping demand.
Operating Revenues were $9.1 million higher in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months. Operating revenues were $6.5 million higher for petroleum transportation primarily due to an increase in time charter rates for three of the company’s U.S.-flag product tankers. Operating revenues were $1.7 million higher for harbor towing and bunkering primarily due to an increase in harbor traffic and were $0.9 million higher for short-sea and liner transportation primarily due to higher cargo shipping demand.
Operating Expenses. Operating Expenses were $0.1 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter and $0.5 million higher in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months. The increases in both periods were primarily due to scheduled union pay rate changes and higher drydocking costs for the Company’s U.S.-flag product tankers. Fuel, lube and supplies for short-sea and liner transportation were lower in both periods primarily due to operating one less vessel. Other operating expenses for short-sea and liner transportation were lower in both periods primarily due to the reduction in stevedoring expenses.
Administrative and General. Administrative and General expenses were $1.4 million lower in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter and $0.5 million lower in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months primarily due to a legal settlement and associated fees in the Prior Year Quarter, partially offset by higher wage and benefit costs.
Gains on Asset Dispositions. During the Current Year Quarter, the Company sold six U.S.-flag harbor tugs, five of which were leased back, for net proceeds of $40.0 million and gains of $15.4 million, of which $3.1 million were recognized currently and $12.3 million were deferred. In addition, the Company recognized impairment charges of $3.0 million during the Current Nine Months related to two of these U.S.-flag harbor tugs while under construction, which were sold and leased back upon their completion.
During the Prior Nine Months, the Company sold two U.S.-flag harbor tugs, one RORO vessel and other equipment for proceeds of $6.6 million and gains of $2.0 million.
Operating Income. Excluding the impact of gains on asset dispositions, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 15% in the Current Year Quarter compared with 6% in the Prior Year Quarter and was 12% in the Current Nine Months compared with 7% in the Prior Nine Months. The increase in both periods was primarily due to the improvement in operating revenues as discussed above.
Other, net. Other, net in the Prior Year Quarter and Prior Nine Months consists primarily of a $7.0 million termination payment from a customer following the cancellation of a long-term charter.
Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax. Equity in losses in all periods reflects losses incurred by the Company’s Jones Act liner transportation 50% or less owned company, partially offset by earnings from a 50% or less owned company that began operating a U.S.-flag articulated tug-barge on the Great Lakes in April 2012. Equity in losses of 50% or less owned companies in the Current Year Quarter also included losses in the Company’s very large gas carrier 50% or less owned company primarily due to out-of-service time for drydocking and drydocking expenses.


35

Table of Contents

Fleet Count
The composition of Shipping Services’ fleet as of September 30 was as follows: 
 
Owned
 
Joint
Ventured
 
Leased-in
 
Total
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.-flag:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product tankers(1)
5

 

 
2

 
7

RORO/deck barges

 
7

 

 
7

Dry bulk articulated tug-barge

 
1

 

 
1

Harbor tugs
15

 

 
9

 
24

Ocean liquid tank barges
5

 

 

 
5

Foreign-flag:
 
 
 
 
 
 


Harbor tugs
4

 

 

 
4

Very large gas carriers

 
3

 

 
3

Short Sea Container/RORO
7

 

 

 
7

 
36

 
11

 
11

 
58

2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.-flag:
 
 
 
 
 
 

Product tankers(1)
5

 

 
2

 
7

RORO/deck barges

 
7

 

 
7

Dry bulk articulated tug-barge

 
1

 

 
1

Harbor tugs
22

 

 
1

 
23

Ocean liquid tank barges
5

 

 

 
5

Foreign-flag:
 
 
 
 
 
 


Harbor tugs
4

 

 

 
4

Very large gas carriers

 

 

 

Short Sea Container/RORO
7

 

 

 
7

 
43

 
8

 
3

 
54

 ______________________
(1)
As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, four were operating under long-term bareboat charters and three were operating under time charters.

36

Table of Contents

Ethanol and Industrial Alcohol
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
52,580

 
100

 
47,813

 
100

 
146,807

 
100

 
146,370

 
100

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
52,390

 
100

 
45,472

 
95

 
145,837

 
99

 
140,078

 
96

Administrative and general
428

 
1

 
545

 
1

 
1,566

 
1

 
1,404

 
1

Depreciation and amortization
1,489

 
3

 
1,578

 
4

 
4,467

 
3

 
4,208

 
3

 
54,307

 
104

 
47,595

 
100

 
151,870

 
103

 
145,690

 
100

Operating Income (Loss)
(1,727
)
 
(4
)
 
218

 

 
(5,063
)
 
(3
)
 
680

 

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative gains (losses), net(1)
1,129

 
2

 
(1,035
)
 
(2
)
 
1,641

 
1

 
(1,756
)
 
(1
)
Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax

 

 

 

 

 

 
6,154

 
4

Segment Profit (Loss)
(598
)
 
(2
)
 
(817
)
 
(2
)
 
(3,422
)
 
(2
)
 
5,078

 
3

______________________
(1)
Alcohol Manufacturing routinely enters into exchange traded positions (primarily corn futures) to offset its net commodity market exposure on raw material and finished goods inventory balances. As of September 30, 2013, the net market exposure to corn under its contracts and its raw material and inventory balances was not material.
Segment Profit (Loss). Segment profit in the Prior Nine Months included a $6.0 million gain, net of tax, resulting from the Company marking its investment in Illinois Corn Processing LLC ("ICP") to fair value upon acquiring a controlling interest on February 1, 2012.
Other Segment Profit
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
$’000
 
$’000
 
$’000
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Emergency and crisis services
62

 
9,267

 
187

 
27,921

Agricultural commodity trading and logistics
27,819

 
48,995

 
62,670

 
98,522

Other activities

 
74

 

 
894

 
27,881

 
58,336

 
62,857

 
127,337

Segment Profit (Loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Emergency and crisis services
689

 
(1,245
)
 
2,023

 
(3,499
)
Agricultural commodity trading and logistics
92

 
(442
)
 
(840
)
 
(265
)
Other activities(1)
(894
)
 
(1,441
)
 
1,203

 
(2,710
)
 
(113
)
 
(3,128
)
 
2,386

 
(6,474
)
 ______________________
(1)
The components of segment profit do not include interest income, which is a significant component of the Company's lending and leasing activities.

37

Table of Contents

Corporate and Eliminations
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
$’000
 
$’000
 
$’000
Corporate Expenses
(7,677
)
 
(9,402
)
 
(27,071
)
 
(26,984
)
Eliminations

 

 

 

Operating Loss
(7,677
)
 
(9,402
)
 
(27,071
)
 
(26,984
)
Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative losses, net
(1,084
)
 
(157
)
 
(5,245
)
 
(939
)
Foreign currency losses, net
361

 
295

 
(200
)
 
232

Other, net
(60
)
 
(47
)
 
(129
)
 
14

Derivative losses, net. Derivative losses, net in the Current Nine Months were primarily due to losses from equity indices and forward currency exchange, option and future contracts. Derivative losses, net in the Prior Nine Months were primarily due to losses from equity indices and interest rate swap agreements offset by gains from equity options.
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit (Loss)
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
$’000
 
$’000
 
$’000
Interest income
4,280

 
3,890

 
10,665

 
13,925

Interest expense
(10,520
)
 
(10,076
)
 
(31,282
)
 
(30,075
)
Debt extinguishment losses, net

 

 

 
(160
)
Marketable security gains (losses), net
(1,149
)
 
(1,730
)
 
9,403

 
13,224

 
(7,389
)
 
(7,916
)
 
(11,214
)
 
(3,086
)
Interest Income. Interest income in the Current Three Months and Current Nine Months includes an interest prepayment and a prepayment penalty received following the early redemption of a note receivable in the Company's lending and leasing portfolio. Interest income in the Prior Nine Months includes a prepayment penalty received following the early redemption of a note receivable in the Company's lending and leasing portfolio and additional interest earned on notes receivable from the Company's 50% or less owned companies.
Interest Expense.  Interest expense remained relatively flat in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months. The changes in interest expense reflects the issuance of the Company's 2.5% Convertible Notes on December 11, 2012, the maturity of the Company's 5.875% Senior Notes on October 1, 2012, reduced borrowings under the Company's revolving credit facility which was terminated August 9, 2013, lower other debt outstanding and higher capitalized interest.   
Marketable Security Gains (Losses), net. Marketable security gains (losses), net in the Current Nine Months and Prior Nine Months were primarily attributable to gains on the Company's long marketable security positions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
The Company's ongoing liquidity requirements arise primarily from working capital needs, capital commitments and its obligations to repay debt obligations. The Company may use its liquidity to fund acquisitions, repurchase shares of SEACOR common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), for treasury or to make other investments. Sources of liquidity are cash balances, marketable securities, construction reserve funds, Title XI reserve funds and cash flows from operations. From time to time, the Company may secure additional liquidity through asset sales or the issuance of debt, shares of Common Stock or common stock of its subsidiaries, preferred stock or a combination thereof.
As of September 30, 2013, the Company’s unfunded capital commitments were $366.5 million and included: 15 offshore support vessels for $100.6 million; two inland river liquid tank barges for $1.7 million; five inland river towboats for $6.3 million; two U.S.-flag product tankers for $250.5 million and other equipment and improvements for $7.4 million. Of these commitments, $25.0 million is payable during the remainder of 2013, $300.5 million is payable during 2014-2015 and $41.0 million is payable during 2016-2017. Subsequent to September 30, 2013, the Company committed to purchase two offshore support vessels and one inland river towboat for a total of $39.2 million.

38

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2013, construction reserve funds of $219.4 million were classified as non-current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as the Company has the intent and ability to use the funds to acquire equipment.
SEACOR’s Board of Directors previously approved a securities repurchase plan that authorizes the Company to acquire Common Stock, which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. As of September 30, 2013, the remaining authority under the repurchase plan was $100.0 million.
SEACOR’s Board of Directors has previously authorized the Company to purchase any or all of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2019, which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company did not repurchase any of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2019.
On August 9, 2013, the Company voluntarily terminated the SEACOR revolving credit facility.
As of September 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $28.1 million with various expiration dates through 2016.
Summary of Cash Flows
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
$’000
Cash flows provided by or (used in):
 
 
 
Operating Activities - Continuing Operations
134,698

 
98,633

Operating Activities - Discontinued Operations
24,298

 
99,629

Investing Activities - Continuing Operations
(55,534
)
 
(325,365
)
Investing Activities - Discontinued Operations
(8,502
)
 
(7,219
)
Financing Activities - Continuing Operations
4,120

 
12,367

Financing Activities - Discontinued Operations
(14,017
)
 
(64,090
)
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
(500
)
 
2,631

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
84,563

 
(183,414
)
Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by operating activities decreased by $39.3 million in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months. The components of cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities during the Current Nine Months and Prior Nine Months were as follows:
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
$’000
 
$’000
Operating income from continuing operations before depreciation, amortization and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net
137,019

 
128,159

Operating income from discontinued operations before depreciation, amortization and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net
6,163

 
55,745

Changes in operating assets and liabilities before interest and income taxes
11,307

 
64,073

Purchases of marketable securities
(7,016
)
 
(35,811
)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
12,791

 
32,175

Cash settlements on derivative transactions, net
(5,554
)
 
(14,813
)
Dividends received from 50% or less owned companies
7,925

 
2,325

Interest paid, excluding capitalized interest
(17,722
)
 
(40,975
)
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
(1,045
)
 
(20,746
)
Other
15,128

 
28,130

Total cash flows provided by operating activities
158,996

 
198,262


39

Table of Contents

Operating income from continuing operations before depreciation, amortization and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net was $8.9 million higher in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months. See “Consolidated Results of Operations” included above for a discussion of the results of each of the Company's business segments.
Operating income from discontinued operations before depreciation, amortization and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net was $49.6 million lower in the Current Nine Months compared with the Prior Nine Months as a result of the sale of the SES Business on March 16, 2012, the sale of SEI on December 31, 2012 and the Spin-off of Era Group on January 31, 2013.
Changes in operating assets and liabilities before interest and income taxes in the Current Nine Months of $11.3 million was primarily due to the Spin-off of Era Group.
During the Current Nine Months, cash used in operating activities included $7.0 million to purchase marketable security long positions. During the Current Nine Months, cash provided by operating activities included $12.8 million received from the sale of marketable security long positions.
During the Prior Nine Months, cash used in operating activities included $19.0 million to purchase marketable security long positions and $16.8 million to cover marketable security short positions. During the Prior Nine Months, cash provided by operating activities included $29.7 million received from the sale of marketable security long positions and $2.5 million received upon entering into marketable security short positions.
Investing Activities
During the Current Nine Months, net cash used by investing activities of continuing operations was $55.5 million primarily as follows:
Capital expenditures were $146.5 million. Equipment deliveries included two specialty offshore support vessels, two liftboats, three wind farm utility vessels, two inland river liquid tank barges and four U.S.-flag harbor tugs.
The Company sold four crew boats, one mini-supply vessel, one supply vessel, three specialty offshore support vessels, five liftboats, 16 inland river dry cargo barges, eight inland river liquid tank barges, eight U.S.-flag harbor tugs and other property and equipment for net proceeds of $214.7 million ($205.7 million in cash, $0.2 million in vendor credits and $8.8 million in seller financing).
Construction reserve funds account transactions included withdrawals of $55.8 million and deposits of $89.2 million.
The Company released restricted cash of $7.4 million.
The Company made investments in its 50% or less owned companies of $91.5 million, including $23.0 million in Sea-Cat Crewzer II LLC, $7.6 million in Mantenimiento Express Maritimo, S.A.P.I. de C.V. ("MexMar"), $42.1 million to Dorian LPG Ltd. and $9.4 million to SEACOR OSV Partners I LP.
On June 6, 2013, the Company acquired a 100% controlling interest in C-Lift LLC through its acquisition of its partner's interest for $12.7 million in cash subject to certain working capital adjustments.
During the Current Nine Months, net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations of $8.5 million was primarily due to Era Group's capital expenditures of $8.7 million.
During the Prior Nine Months, net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations was $325.4 million primarily as follows:
Capital expenditures were $165.0 million. Equipment deliveries included two offshore support vessels, one wind farm utility vessel, three inland river dry cargo barges, four inland river liquid tank barges and two inland river towboats.
The Company sold four offshore support vessels, nine inland river dry cargo barges, two inland river towboats, one RORO vessel, two harbor tugs and other equipment for net proceeds of $14.5 million and received $0.2 million in deposits related to future expected sales. Total net proceeds of $68.3 million on equipment sold included $5.0 million in cash deposits previously received and $48.5 million in seller financing.
On September 28, 2012, the Company made an irrevocable deposit of $171.0 million to its trustee for the extinguishment of the Company's 5.875% Senior Notes at their scheduled maturity on October 1, 2012. As of September 30, 2012, the irrevocable deposit held by the trustee was included in restricted cash.
The Company received $78.0 million from its 50% or less owned companies, including $42.7 million of repayments on short-term notes from MexMar, $20.8 million from SeaJon LLC as a capital distribution and $15.7 million from Avion Pacific Limited ("Avion") as a repayment of advances.

40

Table of Contents

The Company made investments in its 50% or less owned companies of $34.5 million, including $15.7 million of bridge financing to Trailer Bridge, Inc. and $9.0 million in advances to Avion.
Construction reserve funds account transactions included withdrawals of $86.5 million and deposits of $6.5 million.
The Company received net principal payments on third party notes receivable of $17.8 million.
The Company acquired 18 lift boats, real property and working capital from Superior Energy Inc. for $142.5 million.
The Company obtained a 70% controlling interest in ICP through its acquisition of a portion of its partner's interest for $9.1 million in cash.
During the Prior Nine Months, net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations was $7.2 million primarily as follows:
The Company sold certain companies and assets that were part of its Environmental Services business segment for a net sales price of $99.9 million. Net cash proceeds received were $89.3 million.
Era Group's investing activities included capital expenditures of $91.9 million and $4.8 million in proceeds from the sale of seven helicopters and other equipment.
Financing Activities
During the Current Nine Months, net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations was $4.1 million. The Company:
made scheduled payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $13.1 million;
had net borrowings on inventory financing arrangements of $4.2 million; and
received $17.2 million from share award plans.
During the Current Nine Months, net cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations of $14.0 million was primarily due to Era Group's cash balance distributed in the Spin-off.
During the Prior Nine Months, net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations was $12.4 million. The Company:
had borrowings of $115.0 million under the revolving credit facility;
repaid $50.0 million under the revolving credit facility;
purchased $5.5 million, in principal amount, of its 5.875% Senior Notes due 2012 for an aggregate purchase price of $5.7 million;
made scheduled payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $7.6 million;
repaid $3.2 million of acquired debt;
received proceeds of $0.1 million and repaid $0.7 million under working capital lines;
had net borrowings on inventory financing arrangements of $13.4 million;
received $8.4 million from share award plans; and
acquired 330,134 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $28.7 million.
During the Prior Nine Months, net cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations of $64.1 million was primarily due to borrowings under Era Group's senior secured revolving credit facility.
Short and Long-Term Liquidity Requirements
To date, the Company’s liquidity has not been materially impacted by the current credit environment and management does not expect that it will be materially impacted in the near future. The Company anticipates it will continue to generate positive cash flows from operations and that these cash flows will be adequate to meet the Company’s working capital requirements. In support of the Company’s capital expenditure program or other liquidity requirements, the Company may: use its cash balances; sell securities; utilize construction reserve funds; sell assets; enter into sale and leaseback transactions for equipment; issue debt, shares of Common Stock, common stock of its subsidiaries or preferred stock; or a combination thereof. On August 9, 2013, the Company voluntarily terminated the SEACOR revolving credit facility.

41

Table of Contents

The Company’s long-term liquidity is dependent upon its ability to generate operating profits sufficient to meet its requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and a reasonable return on shareholders’ investment. The Company believes that earning such operating profits will permit it to maintain its access to favorably priced debt, equity or off-balance sheet financing arrangements. Management will continue to closely monitor the Company’s liquidity and the credit and capital markets.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
For a discussion of the Company's off-balance sheet arrangements, refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There has been no material change in the Company's off-balance sheet arrangements during the Current Nine Months.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
For a discussion of the Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments, refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There has been no material change in the Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments (excluding Aviation Services) during the Current Nine Months except for additional leases entered upon the sale and leaseback of eight inland river liquid tank barges and seven U.S.-flag harbor tugs. Operating lease expenses under these new leases will be $1.4 million for the remainder of 2013, $11.0 million during 2014-2015, $16.4 million during 2016-2018 and $20.1 million for years after 2018.
Contingencies
On July 14, 2010, a group of individuals and entities purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Terry G. Robin, et al. v. Seacor Marine, L.L.C., et al., No. 2:10-CV-01986 (E.D. La.) (the “Robin Case”), in which they asserted that support vessels, including vessels owned by the Company, responding to the explosion and resulting fire that occurred aboard the semi-submersible drilling rig, the Deepwater Horizon, were negligent in their efforts to save lives and put out the fire and contributed to the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon and subsequent oil spill. The action was part of the overall multi-district litigation, In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”, MDL No. 2179 (“MDL”). The complaint sought compensatory, punitive, exemplary, and other damages. In response to this lawsuit, the Company filed petitions seeking exoneration from, or limitation of liability in relation to, any actions that may have been taken by vessels owned by the Company to extinguish the fire. On June 8, 2011, the Company moved to dismiss these claims (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee) on various legal grounds. On October 12, 2011, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss in its entirety, dismissing with prejudice all claims that had been filed against the Company in the limitation actions (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee that was not subject to the motion to dismiss). The Court entered final judgments in favor of the Company in the Robin Case and each of the limitation actions on November 21, 2011. On December 12, 2011, the claimants appealed each of those judgments to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ("Fifth Circuit"). The claimants' opening brief was submitted on May 7, 2012, and the claimants filed a reply brief on June 1, 2012. Oral argument was not requested by the Fifth Circuit. On December 13, 2012, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court. The claimants have not petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari and their deadline to do so has expired.
With respect to the one claim filed by a Company employee, that individual also commenced a separate action in the MDL entitled DuWayne Mason v. Seacor Marine, LLC, No. 2:11-CV-00826 (E.D. La.), in which he alleges sustaining personal injuries not only in connection with responding to the explosion and fire, but also in the months thereafter in connection with the clean-up of oil and dispersants while a member of the crew of the M/V Seacor Vanguard. Although the case is subject to the MDL Court's stay of individual proceedings, on July 16, 2012 the employee sought to sever his case from the MDL. On March 5, 2013, the Court denied the motion, and on April 2, 2013, the employee filed a motion asking the Court to reconsider. The Company filed its response opposing the employee's motion on April 30, 2013, and on May 3, 2013, the Court denied the motion.  On May 22, 2013, the employee filed a Notice of Appeal to the Fifth Circuit.  On July 24, 2013, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The Fifth Circuit granted the Company's motion to dismiss on August 16, 2013.
On July 20, 2010, two individuals purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans in the State of Louisiana, John Wunstell, Jr. and Kelly Blanchard v. BP, et al., No. 2010-7437 (Division K) (the “Wunstell Action”), in which they assert, among other theories, that Mr. Wunstell suffered injuries as a result of his exposure to certain noxious fumes and chemicals in connection with the provision of remediation, containment and response services by O'Brien's Response Management Inc. ("ORM"), a subsidiary of the Company prior to the ORM Transaction (as defined in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012). The action now is part of the overall MDL. The complaint also seeks to establish a “class-wide court-supervised medical monitoring program” for all individuals “participating in BP's Deepwater Horizon Vessels of Opportunity Program and/or Horizon Response Program” who allegedly experienced injuries similar to those of Mr. Wunstell. The Company believes this lawsuit has no merit and will continue to vigorously defend the action and pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend ORM in connection with the Wunstell Action and claims asserted in the MDL, discussed further below. Although the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter,

42

Table of Contents

the Company does not expect it will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
On December 15, 2010, ORM and National Response Corporation ("NRC"), subsidiaries of the Company prior to the ORM Transaction and SES Business Transaction (as defined in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012), respectively, were named as defendants in one of the several consolidated “master complaints” that have been filed in the overall MDL. The master complaint naming ORM and NRC asserts various claims on behalf of a putative class against multiple defendants concerning the clean-up activities generally, and the use of dispersants specifically. By court order, the Wunstell Action has been stayed as a result of the filing of the referenced master complaint. The Company believes that the claims asserted against ORM and NRC in the master complaint have no merit and on February 28, 2011, ORM and NRC moved to dismiss all claims against them in the master complaint on legal grounds. On September 30, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss that ORM and NRC had filed (an amended decision was issued on October 4, 2011 that corrected several grammatical errors and non-substantive oversights in the original order). Although the Court refused to dismiss the referenced master complaint in its entirety at that time, the Court did recognize the validity of the “derivative immunity” and “implied preemption” arguments that ORM and NRC advanced and directed ORM and NRC to (i) conduct limited discovery to develop evidence to support those arguments and (ii) then re-assert the arguments. The Court did, however, dismiss all state-law claims and certain other claims that had been asserted in the referenced master complaint, and dismissed the claims of all plaintiffs that have failed to allege a legally-sufficient injury. A schedule for limited discovery and motion practice was established by the Court and, in accordance with that schedule, ORM and NRC filed for summary judgment re-asserting their derivative immunity and implied preemption arguments on May 18, 2012. Those motions were argued on July 13, 2012 and are still pending decision. In addition to the indemnity provided to ORM, pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend ORM and NRC in connection with these claims in the MDL. Although the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter, the Company does not expect it will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
Subsequent to the filing of the referenced master complaint, nine additional individual civil actions have been filed in or removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana concerning the clean-up activities generally, which name the Company, ORM and/or NRC as defendants or third-party defendants and are part of the overall MDL. On April 8, 2011, ORM was named as a defendant in Johnson Bros. Corporation of Louisiana v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00781 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual business seeking damages allegedly caused by a delay on a construction project alleged to have resulted from the clean-up operations. On April 15, 2011, ORM and NRC were named as defendants in James and Krista Pearson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. ("BP Exploration"), et al., No. 2:11-CV-00863 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by a husband and wife, who allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and are seeking damages for personal injury, property damage to their boat, and amounts allegedly due under contract. On April 15, 2011, ORM and NRC were named as defendants in Thomas Edward Black v. BP Exploration, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00867 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual who is seeking damages for lost income because he allegedly could not find work in the fishing industry after the oil spill. On April 20, 2011, a complaint was filed in Darnell Alexander, et al. v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00951 (E.D. La.) on behalf of 117 individual plaintiffs that seek to adopt the allegations made in the referenced master complaint against ORM and NRC (and the other defendants). Plaintiffs in this matter have since been granted leave to amend their complaint to include 410 additional individual plaintiffs. On October 3, 2012, ORM and NRC were served with a Rule 14(c) Third-Party Complaint by Jambon Supplier II, L.L.C. and Jambon Marine Holdings L.L.C. in their Limitation of Liability action, In the Matter of Jambon Supplier II, L.L.C., et al., No. 2:12-CV-00426 (E.D. La.). This Third-Party Complaint alleges that if claimant David Dinwiddie, who served as a clean-up crewmember aboard the M/V JAMBON SUPPLIER II vessel during the clean-up efforts, was injured as a result of his exposure to dispersants and chemicals during the course and scope of his employment, then said injuries were caused by the third-party defendants. On November 25, 2012, ORM was named as a defendant in Victoria Sanchez v. American Pollution Control Corp. et al., No. 2:12-CV-00164 (E.D. La.), a maritime suit filed by an individual who allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and sustained personal injuries during the course of such employment. On December 17, 2012, the Court unsealed a False Claims Act lawsuit naming ORM as a defendant, Dillon v. BP, PLC et al., No. 2:12-CV-00987 (E.D. La.)., which is a suit by an individual seeking damages and penalties arising from alleged false reports and claims made to the federal government with respect to the amount of oil burned and dispersed during the clean-up. The federal government has declined to intervene in this suit. On April 8, 2013, the Company, ORM, and NRC were named as defendants in William and Dianna Fitzgerald v. BP Exploration et al., No. 2:13-CV-00650 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by a husband and wife whose son allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and became ill as a result of his exposure to oil and dispersants. Finally, on April 17, 2013, ORM was named as a defendant in Danos et al. v. BP America Production Co. et al., No. 2:13-CV-03747 (removed to E.D. La.), which is a suit by eight individuals seeking damages for dispersant exposure either as a result of their work during clean-up operations or as a result of their residence in the Gulf. By court order, all nine of these additional individual cases have been stayed until further notice. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these matters but believes they are without merit and does not expect that they will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

43

Table of Contents

On February 18, 2011, Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., and Transocean Deepwater Inc. (collectively “Transocean”) named ORM and NRC as third-party defendants in a Rule 14(c) Third-Party Complaint in Transocean's own Limitation of Liability Act action, which is part of the overall MDL, tendering to ORM and NRC the claims in the referenced master complaint that have already been asserted against ORM and NRC. Transocean, Cameron International Corporation, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., and M-I L.L.C. also filed cross-claims against ORM and NRC for contribution and tort indemnity should they be found liable for any damages in Transocean's Limitation of Liability Act action and ORM and NRC have asserted counterclaims against those same parties for identical relief. Weatherford U.S., L.P. and Weatherford International, Inc. (collectively "Weatherford") had also filed cross-claims against ORM and NRC, but moved to voluntarily dismiss these cross-claims without prejudice on February 8, 2013. The Court granted Weatherford's motion that same day. As indicated above, the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these actions but believes they are without merit and does not expect that these matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
On November 16, 2012, 668 individuals who served as beach clean-up workers in Escambia County, Florida during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response commenced a civil action in the Circuit Court for the First Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Escambia County, Abney et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et al., No. 2012-CA-002947, in which they allege, among other things, that ORM and other defendants engaged in the contamination of Florida waters and beaches in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 376 and injured the plaintiffs by exposing them to dispersants during the course and scope of their employment. The case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida on January 13, 2013, Abney et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et la., No. 3:13-CV-00024 (N.D. Fla.), and on January 16, 2013, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) issued a Conditional Transfer Order (“CTO”) transferring the case to the MDL, subject to any timely-filed notice of objection from the plaintiffs. Upon receipt of a notice of objection from the plaintiffs, a briefing schedule was set by the JPML, and so a stay of proceedings and suspension of deadlines was sought and obtained by the Court in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Following briefing before the JPML, the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and consolidated with the MDL on April 2, 2013. On April 22, 2013, a companion case to this matter was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Abood et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et al., No. 3:13-CV-00284 (N.D. Fla.), which alleges identical allegations against the same parties but names an additional 174 plaintiffs, all of whom served as clean-up workers in various Florida counties during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response.  A CTO was issued by the JPML on May 2, 2013, no objection was filed by the plaintiffs, and the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and consolidated with the MDL on May 10, 2013.  By court order, both of these matters have been stayed until further notice. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these matters but believes they are without merit and does not expect that these matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
Separately, on March 2, 2012, the Court announced that BP Exploration and BP America Production Company ("BP America") (collectively "BP") and the plaintiffs had reached an agreement on the terms of two proposed class action settlements that will resolve, among other things, plaintiffs' economic loss claims and clean-up related claims against BP. The parties filed their proposed settlement agreements on April 18, 2012 along with motions seeking preliminary approval of the settlements. The Court held a hearing on April 25, 2012 to consider those motions and preliminarily approved both settlements on May 2, 2012. A final fairness hearing took place on November 8, 2012. The Court granted final approval to the Economic and Property Damages Class Action Settlement on December 21, 2012, and granted final approval to the Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement on January 11, 2013. Both class action settlements are currently on appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Although neither the Company, ORM, or NRC are parties to the settlement agreements, the Company, ORM, and NRC are listed as released parties on the releases accompanying both settlement agreements. As the releases for both settlements have been deemed valid and enforceable by the district court, if the Fifth Circuit affirms these decisions, class members who did not file timely requests for exclusion will be barred from pursuing economic loss, property damage, personal injury, medical monitoring, and/or other released claims against the Company, ORM, and NRC. At this time, the Company expects these settlements to reduce ORM's potential exposure, if any, from some of the pending actions described above, and continues to evaluate the settlements' impacts on these cases.
On January 29, 2013, HEPACO, LLC ("HEPACO"), served a demand for arbitration upon ORM, in which HEPACO claims that ORM owes HEPACO an additional fee of $20,291,178.92 under the parties' Management Services Agreement (“MSA”), dated June 1, 2010.  According to HEPACO, the MSA requires ORM to pay HEPACO an additional fee of 30% of total charges paid under the MSA ("Surcharge") to compensate HEPACO for U.S. Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' insurance or Jones Act insurance and related risks attendant to the work when contract requires labor to be performed over, adjoining and/or in water. ORM denies liability for the Surcharge, intends to vigorously defend against the claim, and has sought indemnity for any resulting judgment and related attorneys fees from BP America and BP Exploration. ORM has advised BP that, pursuant to the Bridge Agreement HOU-WL4-3066 between BP and ORM, effective as of June 1, 2010, under which ORM managed and oversaw, for BP, subcontractors, such as HEPACO, in connection with on-shore services related to the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill, BP ultimately is responsible for the payment of the Surcharge should HEPACO be determined to be entitled to recover it under the MSA.

44

Table of Contents

ORM is defending against three collective action lawsuits, each asserting failure to pay overtime with respect to individuals who provided service on the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response (the “DPH FLSA Actions”) under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).  These cases - Dennis Prejean v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01045) (the “Prejean Action”); Baylor Singleton et. al. v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. et. al. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01716) (the “Singleton Action”); and Himmerite et al. v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. et al. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01533) (the “Himmerite Action”) - were each brought on behalf of certain individuals who worked on the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response and who were classified as independent contractors.  The Prejean, Himmerite and Singleton Actions were each filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and then subsequently consolidated with the overall MDL, in which the Himmerite and Singleton Actions were stayed pursuant to procedures of the MDL.  However, all three cases were severed from the MDL on September 19, 2013, and referred to a Magistrate Judge for pretrial case management, including issuing a scheduling order, overseeing discovery, and any other preliminary matters. The Himmerite and Singleton Actions are still pre-answer. In the Prejean Action, ORM has answered the complaint, a scheduling order has been issued, and plaintiffs have, among other things, filed a Motion for Conditional Certification, which is fully briefed and submitted. The pending Motion for Conditional Certification was referred by order dated September 19, 2013 to the Magistrate Judge for his report and recommendation.  The limitations periods for potential plaintiffs to opt-in to the Prejean, Himmerite and Singleton Actions have all been tolled pending further action by the Court.  The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from any of these DWH FLSA Actions, but believes they are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend against them.
In the course of the Company's business, it may agree to indemnify the counterparty to an agreement.  If the indemnified party makes a successful claim for indemnification, the Company would be required to reimburse that party in accordance with the terms of the indemnification agreement.  Indemnification agreements generally are subject to threshold amounts, specified claim periods and other restrictions and limitations.
In connection with the SES Business Transaction and the ORM Transaction, the Company remains contingently liable for certain indemnification obligations, including potential liabilities relating to work performed in connection with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response. In the case of the SES Business Transaction, such potential liabilities may not exceed the purchase consideration received by the Company for the SES Business Transaction and in the case of the ORM Transaction, are subject to a negotiated cap. The Company currently is indemnified under contractual agreements with BP with respect to such potential liabilities.
In the normal course of its business, the Company becomes involved in various other litigation matters including, among other things, claims by third parties for alleged property damages and personal injuries. Management has used estimates in determining the Company's potential exposure to these matters and has recorded reserves in its financial statements related thereto where appropriate. It is possible that a change in the Company's estimates of that exposure could occur, but the Company does not expect such changes in estimated costs would have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For a discussion of the Company’s exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There has been no significant change in the Company’s exposure to market risk during the Current Nine Months except for reduced exposure upon the Spin-off of Era Group that included purchase commitments denominated in euros and variable LIBOR-based borrowings under Era Group's Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility.
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
With the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, management evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of September 30, 2013. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2013.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Current Year Quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

45

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For a description of developments with respect to pending legal proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, see Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Contingencies".
ITEM 1A.     RISK FACTORS
The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect the Company’s businesses, particularly those mentioned under “Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7 on the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, "Risk Factors" in Item 1A on the Company's 2012 Annual report of Form 10-K and SEACOR’s periodic reporting on Form 8-K (if any), which are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(c)
This table provides information with respect to purchases by the Company of shares of its Common Stock during the Current Year Quarter:
Period
Total Number  Of
Shares
Purchased
 
Average Price  Paid
Per Share
 
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly  Announced
Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Value of
Shares that may Yet be
Purchased under  the
Plans or Programs(1)
July 1 – 31, 2013

 
$

 

 
$
100,000,000

August 1 – 31, 2013

 
$

 

 
$
100,000,000

September 1 – 30, 2013

 
$

 

 
$
100,000,000

 ______________________
(1)
Since February 1997, SEACOR’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of Common Stock, certain debt or a combination thereof. From time to time thereafter, and most recently on February 26, 2013, SEACOR's Board of Directors increased the authority to repurchase Common Stock.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

46

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
10.1
 
Contract for Construction of Two Vessels for Seabulk Tankers, Inc. by National Steel and Shipbuilding Company dated September 10, 2013 (filed in redacted form pursuant to a request for confidential treatment for certain provisions thereof pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; these provisions have been submitted separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission).
 
 
 
31.1
 
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
 
 
 
31.2
 
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
 
 
 
32.1
 
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
32.2
 
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
101.INS**
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
 
 
101.CAL**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
 
 
 
101.DEF**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
 
 
 
101.LAB**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
 
 
 
101.PRE**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
______________________ 
**
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

47

Table of Contents


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
SEACOR Holdings Inc. (Registrant)
 
 
 
 
 
DATE:
October 28, 2013
By:
 
/S/ CHARLES FABRIKANT
 
 
 
 
Charles Fabrikant, Executive Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
DATE:
October 28, 2013
By:
 
/S/ RICHARD RYAN
 
 
 
 
Richard Ryan, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


48

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

10.1
 
Contract for Construction of Two Vessels for Seabulk Tankers, Inc. by National Steel and Shipbuilding Company dated September 10, 2013 (filed in redacted form pursuant to a request for confidential treatment for certain provisions thereof pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; these provisions have been submitted separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission).
 
 
 
31.1
 
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
 
 
 
31.2
 
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
 
 
 
32.1
 
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
32.2
 
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
101.INS**
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
 
 
101.CAL**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
 
 
 
101.DEF**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
 
 
 
101.LAB**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
 
 
 
101.PRE**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
______________________ 
**
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.


49