UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended November 2, 2018
Commission file number: 000-02396
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| California | 95-1778176 | |
| (State of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
| incorporation) | Identification No.) |
1308 North Patt Street
Anaheim, California 92801
(Address of principal executive offices)
(714) 526-5533
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer [ ] | Accelerated filer [ ] |
| Non-accelerated filer [ ] | Smaller reporting company [X] |
| Emerging growth company [ ] |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on April 20, 2018 was $24,940,000.
As of January 18, 2019, there were 9,076,832 shares of common stock outstanding.
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held March 13, 2019 (the “Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10-14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
INDEX TO FORM 10K
| 2 |
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Bridgford Foods Corporation intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. Readers are cautioned that such statements, which may be identified by words including “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “expects,” and similar expressions, are only predictions or estimations and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following: general economic and business conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing; success of operating initiatives; development and operating costs; advertising and promotional efforts; adverse publicity; acceptance of new product offerings; consumer trial and frequency; changes in business strategy or development plans; availability, terms and deployment of capital; availability of qualified personnel; commodity, labor, and employee benefit costs; changes in, or failure to comply with, government regulations; weather conditions; construction schedules; relationships with customers and suppliers; and other factors referenced in this Report.
The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions regarding our business, which involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic and competitive conditions, and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as representation by us or any other person that the objectives or plans of our company will be achieved. The forward-looking statements contained herein speak as of the date of this Report and we undertake no obligation to update such statements after the date hereof.
Background of Business
Bridgford Foods Corporation (collectively with its subsidiaries, “Bridgford”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”), a California corporation, was organized in 1952. We originally began operations in 1932 as a retail meat market in San Diego, California and evolved into a meat wholesaler for hotels and restaurants, a distributor of frozen food products, a processor and packer of meat, and a manufacturer and distributor of frozen food products for sale on a retail and wholesale basis. Currently, we and our subsidiaries are primarily engaged in the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of an extensive line of frozen and snack food products throughout the United States. We have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership, or similar proceedings since inception nor have we been party to any merger, acquisition, etc. or acquired or disposed of any material amounts of assets during the past five years other than those discussed in Item 7 of this Report. Substantially all of our assets have been acquired in the ordinary course of business.
Description of Business
Bridgford Foods Corporation currently operates in two business segments - the processing and distribution of frozen food products and the processing and distribution of snack food products. For information regarding the separate financial performance of the business segments refer to Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.
The following table shows sales, as a percentage of consolidated sales, for each business segment during the last two fiscal years:
| 2018 | 2017 | |||||||
| Frozen Food Products | 27 | % | 29 | % | ||||
| Snack Food Products | 73 | % | 71 | % | ||||
| 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||
We manufacture nearly all of our food products and distribute an extensive line of biscuits, bread dough items, roll dough items, dry sausage products and beef jerky. Our direct store delivery network consists of non-refrigerated snack food products. Our frozen food products division serves both food service and retail customers.
Although we have recently introduced several new products, most of these products have not contributed significantly to our revenue growth for the fiscal year 2018. Our sales are not subject to material seasonal variations. Historically we have been able to respond quickly to the receipt of orders and, accordingly, do not maintain a significant sales backlog. Neither Bridgford Foods Corporation nor its industry generally has unusual demands or restrictions on working capital items. During the last fiscal year, we did not enter into any new markets or any significant contractual or other material relationships.
| 3 |
Availability of SEC Filings and Code of Conduct on Internet Website
We maintain an Internet website at www.bridgford.com. Available on this website, free of charge, are annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and reports filed under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Code of Conduct is also available on the website.
Product Distribution Methods
Our products are delivered to customers using several distinct distribution channels. The distribution channel utilized is dependent upon the needs of our customers, the most efficient proximity to the delivery point, trade customs, and operating segment as well as product type, life and stability. Among our customers are many of the country’s largest broadline and specialty food service distributors. These and other large end purchasers occasionally go through extensive qualification procedures and our manufacturing capabilities are subjected to thorough review by the end purchasers prior to our approval as a vendor. Large end purchasers typically select suppliers that can consistently meet increased volume requirements on a national basis during peak promotional periods. We believe that our manufacturing flexibility, national presence, and long-standing customer relationships should allow us to compete effectively with other manufacturers seeking to provide similar products to our current large food service end purchasers, although no assurances can be given.
The factors that contribute to higher or lower margins generated from each method of distribution depend upon the accepted selling price, level of involvement by our employees in setting up and maintaining displays, distance traveled, and fuel consumed by our company-owned fleet as well as freight and shipping costs depending on the distance the product travels to the delivery point. Management is continually evaluating the profitability of product delivery methods, analyzing alternate methods and weighing economic inputs to determine the most efficient and cost-effective method of delivery to fulfill the needs of our customers.
Major Product Classes
Frozen Food Products
Our frozen food products division serves both food service and retail customers. We sell approximately 140 unique frozen food products through approximately 1,190 wholesalers, cooperatives and distributors.
Frozen Food Products – Food Service Customers
The food service industry is composed of establishments that serve food outside the home and includes restaurants, the food operations of health care providers, schools, hotels, resorts, corporations, and other traditional and non-traditional food service outlets. Growth in this industry has been driven by the increase in away-from-home meal preparation, which has accompanied the expanding number of both dual income and single-parent households. Another trend within the food service industry is the growth in the number of non-traditional food service outlets such as convenience stores, retail stores and supermarkets. These non-traditional locations often lack extensive cooking, storage, or preparation facilities resulting in a need for pre-cooked and prepared foods similar to those we provide. The expansion in the food service industry has also been accompanied by the continued consolidation and growth of broadline and specialty food service distributors, many of which are long-standing customers.
Frozen Food Products – Retail Customers
The majority of our existing and targeted retail customers are involved in the resale of branded and private label packaged foods. The same trends which have contributed to the increase in away-from-home meal preparation have also fueled the growth in easy to prepare, microwaveable frozen and refrigerated convenience foods. Among the fastest growing segments is the frozen and refrigerated hand-held foods market. This growth has been driven by improved product quality and variety and the increasing need for inexpensive and healthy food items that require minimal preparation. Despite rapid growth, many categories of frozen and refrigerated hand-held foods have achieved minimal household penetration. We believe we have been successful in establishing and maintaining supply relationships with certain selected leading retailers in this market.
Frozen Food Products – Sales and Marketing
Our frozen food business covers the United States. Products produced by the Frozen Food Products segment are generally supplied to food service and retail distributors who take title to the product upon shipment receipt through company leased long-haul vehicles. In addition to regional sales managers, we maintain a network of independent food service and retail brokers covering most of the United States. Brokers are compensated on a commission basis. We believe that our broker relationships, in close cooperation with our regional sales managers, are a valuable asset providing significant new product and customer opportunities. Regional sales managers perform several significant functions for us, including identifying and developing new business opportunities and providing customer service and support to our distributors and end purchasers through the effective use of our broker network.
| 4 |
Our annual advertising expenditures are directed towards retail and institutional customers. These customers participate in various special promotional and marketing programs and direct advertising allowances we sponsor. We also invest in general consumer advertising in various newspapers and periodicals including free standing inserts and coupons to advertise in major markets. We direct advertising toward food service customers with campaigns in major industry publications and through our participation in trade shows throughout the United States. Our advertising strategy includes our presence on social media and online distribution of promotional material.
Snack Food Products
During fiscal year 2018, our snack food products division sold approximately 120 different items through customer-owned distribution centers and a direct-store-delivery network serving approximately 17,000 supermarkets, mass merchandise and convenience retail stores located in 49 states.
Products produced or distributed by the Snack Food Products segment are supplied to customers through either direct delivery to customer warehouses or direct-store-delivery to retail locations. We utilize customer managed warehouse distribution centers to lower distribution cost. Product delivered to the customer’s warehouse is then distributed to the store where it is resold to the end consumer. Our direct-store-delivery system focus emphasizes high quality service of our premium branded product to our customers. We also provide the service of setting up and maintaining the display and restocking our products.
Snack Food Products — Customers
Our customers are comprised of large retail chains and smaller “independent” operators. This part of our business is highly competitive. Proper placement of our product lines is critical to selling success since most items could be considered “impulse” items which are often consumed shortly after purchase. Our ability to sell successfully to this distribution channel depends on aggressive marketing and maintaining relationships with key buyers.
Snack Food Products — Sales and Marketing
Snack food products are distributed across the United States. Regional sales managers perform several significant functions including identifying and developing new business opportunities and providing customer service and support to our customers. We also utilize the services of brokers, where appropriate, to support efficient product distribution and customer satisfaction.
Product Planning and Research and Development
We continually monitor the consumer acceptance of each product within our extensive product line. Individual products are regularly added to and deleted from our product line. Historically, the addition or deletion of any individual product has not had a material effect on our operations in the current fiscal year. We believe that a key factor in the success of our products is our system of carefully targeted research and testing of our products to ensure high quality and that each product matches an identified market opportunity. The emphasis in new product introductions in the past several years has been in single service items. We are constantly searching to develop new products to complement our existing product lines and improve processing techniques and formulas. We utilize an in-house test kitchen and consultants to research and experiment with unique food preparation methods, improve quality control and analyze new ingredient mixtures.
Competition
Our products are sold under highly competitive conditions. All food products can be considered competitive with other food products, but we consider our principal competitors to include national, regional and local producers and distributors of refrigerated, frozen and non-refrigerated snack food products. Several of our competitors include large companies with substantially greater financial and marketing resources than ours. Existing competitors may broaden their product lines and potential competitors may enter or increase their focus on our market, resulting in greater competition for us. We believe that our products compete favorably with those of our competitors. Such competitors’ products compete against ours for retail shelf space, institutional distribution and customer preference.
Effect of Government Regulations
Our operations are subject to extensive inspection and regulation by the United States Department of Agriculture (the “USDA”), the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), and by other federal, state, and local authorities regarding the processing, packaging, storage, transportation, distribution, and labeling of products that we manufacture, produce and process. Our processing facilities and products are subject to continuous inspection by the USDA and/or other federal, state, and local authorities. The USDA has issued strict regulations concerning the control of listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat meat and poultry products and contamination by food borne pathogens such as E. coli and salmonella, and implemented a system of regulation known as the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (“HACCP”) program. The HACCP program requires all meat and poultry processing plants to develop and implement sanitary operating procedures and other program requirements. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) oversees safety compliance and establishes certain employer responsibilities to help “assure safe and healthful working conditions” and keep the workplace free of recognized hazards or practices likely to cause death or serious injury. We believe that we are currently in compliance with governmental laws and regulations and that we maintain the necessary permits and licenses relating to our operations.
| 5 |
To date, federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, have not had a material effect on our business.
Importance of Key Customers
Sales to Wal-Mart® comprised 36.4% of revenues in fiscal year 2018 and 31.3% of total accounts receivable was due from Wal-Mart® as of November 2, 2018. Sales to Wal-Mart® comprised 37.7% of revenues in fiscal year 2017 and 36.9% of total accounts receivable was due from Wal-Mart® as of November 3, 2017. Sales to Dollar General® comprised 9.6% of revenues in fiscal year 2018 and 23.5% of total accounts receivable was due from Dollar General® as of November 2, 2018.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
We purchase large quantities of pork, beef, and flour. These ingredients are generally available from a number of different suppliers although the availability of these ingredients is subject to seasonal variation. We build ingredient inventories to take advantage of downward trends in seasonal prices or anticipated supply limitations.
Most flour purchases are made at market price without contracts. We also purchase bulk flour under short-term fixed price contracts at current market prices. The contracts are usually effective for a month or less and are not material to our operations. These contracts are settled within a month’s time and no significant contracts remain open at the close of the reporting period. We monitor and manage our ingredient costs to help negate volatile daily swings in market prices when possible. We do not participate in the commodity futures market or hedging to limit commodity exposure.
Employees
We had 544 employees as of November 2, 2018, approximately 41% of whose employment relationship is governed by collective bargaining agreements. These agreements currently expire between May 2019 and March 2022. We believe that our relationship with all of our employees is favorable and contracts will be settled favorably.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The names, ages, and positions of all our executive officers as of January 18, 2019 are listed below. William L. Bridgford is the nephew of Allan L. Bridgford. Officers are normally appointed annually by the Board of Directors at their meeting immediately following the annual meeting of shareholders. Three executive officers are full-time employees of our company. Allan L. Bridgford worked 50% of full time during fiscal year 2018.
| Name | Age | Position(s) with our company | ||
| Allan L. Bridgford | 83 | Vice President and member of the Executive Committee | ||
| William L. Bridgford | 64 | Chairman and member of the Executive Committee | ||
| John V. Simmons | 63 | President and member of the Executive Committee | ||
| Raymond F. Lancy | 65 | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and member of the Executive Committee |
In addition to the other matters set forth in this Report, the continuing operations and the price of our common stock are subject to the following risks, each of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The risks described below are only the risks that we currently believe are material to our business. However, additional risks not presently known, or risks that are currently believed to be immaterial, may also impair our business operations.
| 6 |
We are subject to general risks in the food industry, including, among other things, risk relating to changes in consumer preferences and product contamination as well as general economic conditions, any of which risks, if realized, could negatively impact our operating results and financial position.
The food industry, and the markets within the food industry in which we compete, are subject to various risks, including the following: evolving consumer preferences, nutritional and health-related concerns, federal, state and local food inspection and processing controls, consumer product liability claims, risks of product tampering, and the availability and expense of liability insurance. The meat and poultry industries are subject to scrutiny due to the association of meat and poultry products with recent outbreaks of illness, and on rare occasions even death, caused by food borne pathogens. Product recalls are sometimes required in the food industry to withdraw contaminated or mislabeled products from the market. Additionally, the failure to identify and react appropriately to changes in consumer trends, demands and preferences could lead to, among other things, reduced demand and price reduction for our products. Further, we may be adversely affected by changes in domestic or foreign economic conditions, including inflation or deflation, interest rates, availability of capital markets, consumer spending rates, and energy availability and costs (including fuel surcharges). These and other general risks related to the food industry, if realized by us, could have a significant adverse effect on demand for our products, as well as the costs and availability of raw materials, ingredients and packaging materials, thereby negatively affecting our operating results and financial position.
Fluctuations in the prices that we pay for raw materials could negatively impact our financial results.
We purchase large quantities of commodity pork, beef and flour. Historically, market prices for products we process have fluctuated in response to a number of factors, including changes in the United States government farm support programs, changes in international agricultural and trading policies, weather, and other conditions during the growing and harvesting seasons. Our operating results are heavily dependent upon the prices paid for raw materials. The marketing of our value-added products does not lend itself to instantaneous changes in selling prices. Changes in selling prices are relatively infrequent and do not compare with the volatility of commodity markets. While fluctuations in significant cost structure components, such as ingredient commodities and fuel prices, have had a significant impact on profitability over the last three years, the impact of general price inflation on our financial position and results of operations has not been significant. Future volatility of general price inflation or deflation and raw material cost and availability could adversely affect our financial results.
We are subject to extensive government regulations and a failure to comply with such regulations could negatively impact our financial results.
Our operations are subject to extensive inspection and regulation by the USDA, FDA and by other federal, state, and local authorities regarding the processing, packaging, storage, transportation, distribution, and labeling of products that are manufactured, produced and processed by us. Our processing facilities and products are subject to continuous inspection by the USDA and/or other federal, state, and local authorities. The USDA has issued strict regulations concerning the control of listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat meat and poultry products and contamination by food borne pathogens such as E. coli and salmonella and implemented a system of regulation known as the HACCP program. The HACCP program requires all meat and poultry processing plants to develop and implement sanitary operating procedures and other program requirements. OSHA oversees safety compliance and establishes certain employer responsibilities to help “assure safe and healthful working conditions” and keep the workplace free of recognized hazards or practices likely to cause death or serious injury. We believe that we are currently in compliance with governmental laws and regulations and that we maintain necessary permits and licenses relating to our operations.
A failure to obtain or a loss of necessary permits and licenses could delay or prevent us from meeting current product demand and could adversely affect our operating performance. Furthermore, we are routinely subject to new or modified laws, regulations and accounting standards. If found to be out of compliance with applicable laws and regulations in these or other areas, we could be subject to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls, or asset seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, any of which could have a significant adverse effect on our financial results.
We depend on our key management, the loss of which could negatively impact our operations.
Our executive officers and certain other key employees have been primarily responsible for the development and expansion of our business, and the loss of the services of one or more of these individuals could adversely affect us. Our success will be dependent in part upon our continued ability to recruit, motivate, and retain qualified personnel. We cannot assure that we will be successful in this regard. We have no employment or non-competition agreements with key personnel.
We depend on our major customers and any loss of such customers could have a negative impact on our profitability.
We could suffer significant reductions in revenues and operating income if we lost one or more of our largest customers, including Wal-Mart® and Dollar General®, which accounted for 36.5% and 9.6%, respectively, of sales in fiscal year 2018. Many of our customers, such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs, and food distributors have consolidated in recent years. Such consolidation has produced large, sophisticated customers with increased buying power who are more capable of operating with reduced inventories while demanding lower pricing and increased promotional programs. These customers also may use their shelf space for their own private label products. Failure to respond to these trends could reduce our volume and cause us to lower prices or increase promotional spending for our product lines which could adversely affect our profitability.
| 7 |
With more than 80% of our stock beneficially owned by the Bridgford family, there are risks that they can exert significant influence or control over our corporate matters.
Members of the Bridgford family beneficially own, in the aggregate, more than 80% of our outstanding stock. In addition, three members of the Bridgford family currently serve on the Board of Directors. As a result, members of the Bridgford family have the ability to exert substantial influence or actual control over our management and affairs and over substantially all matters requiring action by our shareholders, including amendments to by-laws, election and removal of directors, any proposed merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets and other corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may also delay or prevent a change in control otherwise favored by our other shareholders and could depress our stock price. Additionally, as a result of the Bridgford family’s significant ownership of the outstanding voting stock, we have relied on the “controlled company” exemption from certain corporate governance requirements of the NASDAQ stock market. Therefore, among other things, we have elected not to implement the rule that provides for a nominating committee to identify and recommend nominees to the Board of Directors and have instead elected to have the full Board of Directors perform such function. Additionally, pursuant to this exemption, our compensation committee, which is made up of independent directors, does not have sole authority to determine the compensation of our executive officers, including our Chairman of the Board.
We participate in Multiemployer Pension Plans which could negatively impact our operations and profitability.
We participate in “multiemployer” pension plans administered by labor unions on behalf of their employees. We make monthly contributions for healthcare and pension benefit obligations. The contribution amount may change depending upon the ability of participating companies to fund these pension liabilities as well as the actual and expected returns on pension plan assets. Should we withdraw from the union and cease participation in a union plan, federal law could impose a penalty for additional contributions to the plan. The penalty would be recorded as an expense in the consolidated statement of operations. The ultimate amount of the withdrawal liability is dependent upon several factors including the funded status of the plan and contributions made by other participating companies. We continue to participate in other multiemployer union plans. In the event of a full or partial withdrawal from these plans, the impact to our financial statements could be material.
Eminent domain and land risk regulations could negatively impact our financial results and financial position.
We own real property on which we operate our processing and/or our distribution operations. As is the case with any owner of real property, we may be subject to eminent domain proceedings that can impact the value of investments we have made in real property as well as potentially disrupt our business operations. If subject to eminent domain proceedings or other government takings, we may not be adequately compensated.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
We own the following properties:
| Property Location | Building Square Footage |
Acreage | ||||||
| Anaheim, California * | 100,000 | 5.0 | ||||||
| Dallas, Texas * | 94,000 | 4.0 | ||||||
| Dallas, Texas * | 30,000 | 2.0 | ||||||
| Dallas, Texas * | 16,000 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Dallas, Texas * | 3,200 | 1.5 | ||||||
| Statesville, North Carolina * | 42,000 | 8.0 | ||||||
| Chicago, Illinois ** | 156,000 | 1.5 | ||||||
| Chicago, Illinois ** | 177,000 | 8.0 | ||||||
| * | - property used by Frozen Food Products Segment |
| ** | - property used by Snack Food Products Segment |
| 8 |
We utilize the foregoing properties for processing, warehousing, distributing and administrative purposes. We also lease warehouse and/or office facilities throughout the United States through month-to-month rental agreements. We believe that our properties are generally adequate to satisfy our foreseeable needs. Additional properties may be acquired and/or plants expanded if favorable opportunities and conditions arise.
No material legal proceedings were pending against us as of November 2, 2018 or as of the date of filing of this Report. We are likely to be subject to claims arising from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. In certain of such actions, plaintiffs may request punitive or other damages that may not be covered by insurance and, accordingly, no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of any such possible future claims or litigation or their effect on us. Any adverse litigation trends and outcomes could significantly and negatively affect our financial results.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
| 9 |
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Common Stock and Dividend Data
Our common stock is traded in the national over-the-counter market and is authorized for quotation on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “BRID”.
As of January 17, 2019, there were 810 shareholders of record in our common stock.
The payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon future earnings, financial requirements, and other factors.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
During the period covered by this Report, we did not sell or issue any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Repurchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
During fiscal year 2018, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock pursuant to our stock repurchase program previously authorized by the Board of Directors. The following table provides information regarding our repurchases of common stock in each of the four periods comprising the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2018.
| Period (1) | Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid Per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) |
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
||||||||||||
| July 13, 2018 – August 10, 2018 | - | $ | - | - | 120,113 | |||||||||||
| August 11, 2018 – September 7, 2018 | - | - | - | 120,113 | ||||||||||||
| September 8, 2018 – October 5, 2018 | - | - | - | 120,113 | ||||||||||||
| October 6, 2018 – November 2, 2018 | - | - | - | 120,113 | ||||||||||||
| Total | - | $ | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 10 |
| (1) | The periods shown are our fiscal periods during the sixteen-week quarter ended November 2, 2018. |
| (2) | All repurchases reflected in the foregoing table were made on the open market. Our stock repurchase program was approved by the Board of Directors in November 1999 (1,500,000 shares authorized, disclosed in a Form 10-K filed on January 26, 2000) and was expanded in June 2005 (500,000 additional shares authorized, disclosed in a press release and Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2005). Under the stock repurchase program, we are authorized, at the discretion of management and the Board of Directors, to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock on the open market. Our Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”) is administered by Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”) for purchase of shares of our common stock in compliance with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Commencing on October 15, 2018 and continuing through and including October 14, 2019, CGM shall act as our exclusive agent to purchase shares of our common stock under the Purchase Plan. This Purchase Plan supplements any purchases of common stock by us “outside” of the Purchase Plan, which may occur from time to time, in open market transactions pursuant to Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. The daily purchase quantity is defined as a number of shares up to, but not to exceed, each day’s applicable Rule 10b-18 maximum volume limit (i.e. 25% of the prior four calendar weeks’ average daily trading volume); however, once per week a block of stock may be purchased that exceeds the Rule 10b-18 average daily trading volume condition, provided that no other Purchase Plan purchases are made on any day on which such a block is purchased. As of November 2, 2018, the total maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the Purchase Plan is 120,113 at a purchase price not to exceed $10.00 per share for a total maximum aggregate price (exclusive of commission) of $1,201,130. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Not applicable for a smaller reporting company.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
For a complete understanding, this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report.
Certain statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Bridgford Foods Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: general economic and business conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing; success of operating initiatives; development and operating costs; advertising and promotional efforts; adverse publicity; acceptance of new product offerings; consumer trial and frequency; changes in business strategy or development plans; availability, terms and deployment of capital; availability of qualified personnel; commodity, labor, and employee benefit costs; changes in, or failure to comply with, government regulations; weather conditions; construction schedules; and other factors referenced in this Report.
Results of Operations (in thousands except percentages)
Fiscal Year Ended November 2, 2018 (52 weeks) Compared to Fiscal Year Ended November 3, 2017 (53 weeks)
Net Sales-Consolidated
Net sales in fiscal year 2018 increased $7,034 (4.2%) when compared to the prior fiscal year. The changes in net sales were comprised as follows:
| Impact on Net Sales-Consolidated | % | $ | ||||||
| Selling price per pound | -3.4 | (6,097 | ) | |||||
| Unit sales volume in pounds | 6.9 | 12,405 | ||||||
| Returns activity | 0.3 | 473 | ||||||
| Promotional activity | 0.4 | 253 | ||||||
| Increase in net sales | 4.2 | 7,034 | ||||||
| 11 |
Net Sales-Frozen Food Products Segment
Net sales in the Frozen Food Products segment in fiscal year 2018 decreased $1,815 (3.7%) compared to the prior fiscal year. The changes in net sales were comprised as follows:
| Impact on Net Sales-Frozen Food Products | % | $ | ||||||
| Selling price per pound | -0.9 | (495 | ) | |||||
| Unit sales volume in pounds | -3.6 | (1,949 | ) | |||||
| Returns activity | -0.1 | (23 | ) | |||||
| Promotional activity | 0.9 | 652 | ||||||
| Decrease in net sales | -3.7 | (1,815 | ) | |||||
The decrease in net sales in fiscal year 2018 was attributable to lower unit sales volumes. Weak customer demand in the retail distribution channel for rolls, monkey bread and certain other bread products resulted in a combined decrease of 24% in volume. Selling prices per pound decreased compared to the prior fiscal year.
Net Sales-Snack Food Products Segment
Net sales in the Snack Food Products segment in fiscal year 2018 increased $8,849 (7.5%) compared to the prior fiscal year. The changes in net sales were comprised as follows:
| Impact on Net Sales-Snack Food Products | % | $ | ||||||
| Selling price per pound | -4.5 | (5,602 | ) | |||||
| Unit sales volume in pounds | 11.5 | 14,354 | ||||||
| Returns activity | 0.6 | 496 | ||||||
| Promotional activity | -0.1 | (399 | ) | |||||
| Increase in net sales | 7.5 | 8,849 | ||||||
The increase in net sales in fiscal year 2018 was attributable to a significant increase in unit volume in pounds in the beef products category compared to fiscal year 2017. The volume of pork-based products was also higher compared to fiscal year 2017. Partially offsetting the volume increases, sales prices per pound declined due primarily to lower per pound selling prices for larger package sizes. Returns activity was lower as a percent of sales than the prior fiscal year due to favorable return trends and superior product quality. Promotional activity was slightly higher as a percent of sales due to timing of programs with significant customers compared to the prior fiscal year.
Cost of Products Sold and Gross Margin-Consolidated
Cost of products sold from continuing operations increased by $12,114 (11.5%) compared to the prior fiscal year. Higher unit sales volume in the Snack Food Products segment was the primary contributing factor to the increase in cost of products sold. Overhead spending increased due to significant increases in hourly wages, healthcare expenses and indirect operating supplies. Costs related to an additional production facility currently under construction also increased overhead expenses. Increases in meat commodity costs during fiscal year 2018 also contributed to the increase in cost of products sold as described in the segment analysis below. The gross margin decreased from 36.8% to 32.4% during fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior fiscal year.
| Change in Cost of Products Sold by Segment | $ | % | Commodity
$ Increase |
|||||||||
| Frozen Food Products Segment | 815 | 0.8 | 96 | |||||||||
| Snack Food Products Segment | 11,299 | 10.7 | 1,845 | |||||||||
| Total | 12,114 | 11.5 | 1,941 | |||||||||
Cost of Products Sold and Gross Margin–Frozen Food Products Segment
Cost of products sold in the Frozen Food Products segment increased by $815 (2.7%) to $30,992 in fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior fiscal year. Cost of products sold was higher due to higher commodity costs of approximately $96 and changes in product mix partially offset by lower sales volume. The gross margin percentage decreased from 38.5% to 34.4% during fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior fiscal year.
Cost of Products Sold and Gross Margin–Snack Food Products Segment
Cost of products sold in the Snack Food Products segment increased by $11,299 (15.0%) compared to the prior fiscal year due primarily to higher sales volume and higher meat commodity costs. The cost of meat commodities increased approximately $1,845 during fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior fiscal year. The gross margin earned in this segment decreased from 36.1% to 31.7% during fiscal year 2018 primarily as a result of lower per pound selling prices, higher overhead spending and higher commodity costs.
| 12 |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Consolidated
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) in fiscal year 2018 increased $1,113 (2.3%) when compared to the prior fiscal year. The increase in this category did not directly correspond to the change in sales.
The table below summarizes the primary expense variances in this category:
November 2, 2018 (52 Weeks) | November 3, 2017 (53 Weeks) | Expense
Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||
| Wages and bonus | $ | 21,212 | $ | 22,248 | $ | (1,036 | ) | |||||
| Pension costs | 956 | 1,969 | (1,013 | ) | ||||||||
| Healthcare costs | 2,661 | 1,706 | 955 | |||||||||
| Repairs and maintenance “SQF” expense | 567 | - | 567 | |||||||||
| Outside storage | 135 | 671 | (536 | ) | ||||||||
| Cash surrender value gains | (816 | ) | (1,351 | ) | 535 | |||||||
| Product advertising | 6,136 | 5,688 | 448 | |||||||||
| Insurance | 487 | 871 | (384 | ) | ||||||||
| Travel | 2,113 | 1,857 | 256 | |||||||||
| Workers’ compensation cost | 587 | 351 | 236 | |||||||||
| Vehicles repairs | 739 | 536 | 203 | |||||||||
| Outside consultants | 1,885 | 1,718 | 167 | |||||||||
| Other SG&A | 13,267 | 12,552 | 715 | |||||||||
| Total - SG&A | 49,929 | 48,816 | 1,113 | |||||||||
Lower profits and profit-sharing accruals resulted in lower wages and bonus expense in fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior year. The decrease in pension costs was due to higher pension discount rates being used to compute future liability estimates. Healthcare benefit expense has increased due to recent unfavorable claim activity compared to fiscal year 2017. Repairs and maintenance expense increased as the Company’s Chicago production facility now complies with Food Safety Certification requirements created and managed by the SQF Institute. Outside storage costs declined due to acquisition of a new facility currently being used to warehouse products prior to shipment. The gain on cash surrender value of life insurance policies was lower than fiscal year 2017 due to lower stock market gains. Costs for product advertising increased mainly as a result of higher payments under brand licensing agreements in the Snack Food Products segment during fiscal year 2018. Insurance costs decreased due to very low claim activity and the settlement of older larger claims. Travel expenses increased due to research related to construction of the new plant as well as increased travel by business development managers. Vehicle repairs expenses increased on long haul trucks and direct store delivery vehicles due to an increase in miles traveled and aging vehicles. Outside consultants expenses increased due to more frequent USDA inspection fees due to increased hours of operation at the Chicago location and increased inspection at the Statesville, North Carolina, location. The major components comprising the increase of “Other SG&A” expenses were higher vacation expense and property taxes.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Frozen Food Products Segment
SG&A expenses in the Frozen Food Products segment decreased by $508 (3.4%) to $14,226 during fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior fiscal year. The overall decrease in SG&A expenses was due to lower unit sales volume in pounds partially offset by higher vehicle expenses for long-haul trucks and higher outside consulting fees for USDA inspections at the Statesville location.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Refrigerated and Snack Food Products Segment
SG&A expenses in the Snack Food Products segment increased by $1,621 (4.8%) to $35,703 during fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior fiscal year. Most of the increase was due to higher unit sales volume in pounds.
Gain on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment
On March 7, 2018, the Company sold a parcel of land in Chicago, Illinois for approximately $5,977 and recognized a non-recurring pre-tax gain in fiscal year 2018. The cost basis of the land was insignificant.
Income Taxes
The Company’s effective income tax rate was 49.1% and 31.6% in fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively. In fiscal year 2018, the effective income tax rate differed from the applicable mixed statutory rate of approximately 23.1% primarily due to tax reform adjustment of deferred income taxes, the Domestic Production Activities Deduction and a change in the liability on unrecognized benefits related to research and development tax credits (refer to Note 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information).
| 13 |
Liquidity and Capital Resources (in thousands except share amounts, percentages and ratios)
The principal source of our operating cash flow is cash receipts from the sale of our products, net of costs to manufacture, store, market and deliver to customers. The Company did not borrow on the line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. during fiscal 2018. There were no borrowings outstanding under this line of credit as of November 2, 2018. The Company was in compliance with all loan covenants under its line of credit except the capital expenditure maximum which was subsequently waived in a letter dated January 3, 2019. We typically fund our operations from cash balances and cash flow generated from operations. We normally expect positive operating cash flows in the first quarter of our fiscal year from the liquidation of inventory and accounts receivable balances related to holiday season sales. We typically build inventories in the third quarter for anticipated promotional sales that occur in the fourth and first quarters. Anticipated commodity price trends may also affect cash balances. Certain commodities may be purchased in advance of our immediate needs to lower the ultimate cost of processing or to meet customer demand.
Cash flows from operating activities:
November 2, 2018 (52 Weeks) |
November 3, 2017 (53 Weeks) |
|||||||
| Net income | $ | 6,496 | $ | 8,829 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation | 3,940 | 3,366 | ||||||
| Provision for losses on accounts receivable | 24 | 26 | ||||||
| Provision for (reduction in) promotional allowances | 94 | (266) | ||||||
| Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | (6,236 | ) | (58) | |||||
| Deferred income taxes, net | 4,940 | (490 | ) | |||||
| Changes in operating working capital | (993 | ) | 5,362 | |||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 8,265 | $ | 16,769 | ||||
For the fifty-two weeks ended November 2, 2018, net cash provided by operating activities was $8,266, a decrease of $8,503 compared to the fifty-three weeks ended November 3, 2017. The net decrease in cash provided by operating activities primarily related to lower net income of $6,496 and deferred income taxes of $4,940 partially offset by a decrease in non-current liabilities of $3,669 and payments for estimated taxes of $1,726. During fiscal year 2018, we funded $3,150 towards our defined benefit pension plan. Plan funding strategies may be adjusted depending upon economic conditions, investment options, tax deductibility, or legislative changes in funding requirements.
Our cash conversion cycle (defined as days of inventory and trade receivables less days of trade payables outstanding) was equal to 64 days for the fifty-two weeks ended November 2, 2018 and 73 days for the fifty-three weeks ended November 3, 2017. Significant customers increased the length of payment terms during fiscal year 2017 which increased the prior fiscal year’s cash conversion cycle.
For the fifty-three weeks ended November 3, 2017, net cash provided by operating activities was $16,769. This result was primarily related to net income and a reduction of inventory. During fiscal year 2017, we funded $1,150 towards our defined benefit pension plan.
Cash used in investing activities:
November 2, 2018 (52 Weeks) |
November 3, 2017 (53 Weeks) |
|||||||
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | $ | 6,035 | $ | 58 | ||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | (18,147 | ) | (11, 574 | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (12,112 | ) | $ | (11,516 | ) | ||
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment include the acquisition of equipment, upgrading of facilities to maintain operating efficiency and investments in cost effective technologies to lower costs. In general, we capitalize the cost of additions and improvements and expense the cost for repairs and maintenance. We may also capitalize costs related to improvements that extend the life, increase the capacity, or improve the efficiency of existing machinery and equipment. Specifically, capitalization of upgrades of facilities to maintain operating efficiency include acquisitions of machinery and equipment used on packaging lines and refrigeration equipment used to process food products.
| 14 |
The table below highlights the additions to property, plant and equipment for the fifty-two and fifty-three weeks ended:
November 2, 2018 (52 Weeks) |
November 3, 2017 (53 Weeks) |
|||||||
| Land | $ | 55 | $ | 2,051 | ||||
| Building | 141 | 3,975 | ||||||
| Building improvements | 702 | 1,533 | ||||||
| Leasehold improvements | 9 | 42 | ||||||
| Temperature control | - | 786 | ||||||
| Processing equipment | 7,915 | 1,031 | ||||||
| Packaging lines | 181 | 1,020 | ||||||
| Vehicles for sales and/or delivery | 953 | 1,081 | ||||||
| Quality control and communication systems | 43 | 121 | ||||||
| Computer software and hardware | 18 | 352 | ||||||
| Forklifts | 253 | 47 | ||||||
| Change in projects in process | 7,877 | (465) | ||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | $ | 18,147 | $ | 11,574 | ||||
Expenditures for additions to property, plant and equipment during the fifty-two weeks ended November 2, 2018 include projects in process of $7,615 related to the new facility in Chicago.
| Cash used in financing activities: | ||||||||
November 2, 2018 (52 Weeks) |
November 3, 2017 (53 Weeks) |
|||||||
| Payments of capital lease obligations | $ | (83 | ) | $ | (129 | ) | ||
| Net cash used in financing activities | $ | (83 | ) | $ | (129 | ) | ||
Our stock repurchase program was approved by the Board of Directors in November 1999 and was expanded in June 2005. Under the stock repurchase program, we are authorized, at the discretion of management and the Board of Directors, to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock on the open market. As of the end of fiscal year 2018, 120,113 shares were still authorized for repurchase under the program.
We invested in OTR (over-the-road) tractors during fiscal year 2012 financed by a capital lease obligation in the amount of $1,848. The total capital lease obligation was settled as of November 2, 2018 with no remaining lease liability. We bought several of the tractors and converted to month-to-month arrangements on other tractors as needed. We plan to invest in new capital lease arrangements in fiscal 2019.
We maintain a line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that expires on March 1, 2020. The line of credit was expanded from $5,000 to $7,500 during the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Under the terms of this line of credit, we may borrow up to $7,500 at an interest rate equal to the bank’s prime rate or Libor plus 1.5%. The borrowing agreement contains various covenants, the more significant of which require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth, a minimum quick ratio, a minimum net income after tax and total capital expenditures less than $7,500. The Company was in violation of the capital expenditure covenant which was subsequently waived by letter dated January 3, 2019. The Company was in compliance with all other covenants as of November 2, 2018. There have been no borrowings under this line of credit during fiscal year 2018.
On December 26, 2018, we entered into a master collateral loan and security agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A for up to $15,000 in equipment financing. Pursuant to the loan agreement, we borrowed $7,500 to purchase specific equipment for our new Chicago processing facility at a fixed rate of 4.13% per annum. The loan term is seven years and is secured by the purchased equipment. The funds were received on December 28, 2018. The master collateral loan and security agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. contains various affirmative and negative covenants that limit the use of funds and define other provisions of the loan. The main financial covenants are listed below:
| ● | Total Liabilities divided by Tangible Net Worth not greater than 2.5 to 1.0 at each fiscal quarter, | |
| ● | Quick Ratio not less than 1.0 to 1.0 at each fiscal quarter end, | |
| ● | Net income after taxes not less than one dollar on a quarterly basis, determined as of each fiscal quarter end. |
| 15 |
Impact of Inflation
Our operating results are heavily dependent upon the prices paid for raw materials. The marketing of our value-added products does not lend itself to instantaneous changes in selling prices. Changes in selling prices are relatively infrequent and do not compare with the volatility of commodity markets. While fluctuations in significant cost structure components, such as ingredient commodities and fuel prices, have had a significant impact on profitability over the last two fiscal years, the impact of general price inflation on our financial position and results of operations has not been significant. However, future volatility of general price inflation or deflation and raw material cost and availability could adversely affect our financial results.
Management is of the opinion that our strong financial position and our capital resources are sufficient to provide for our operating needs and capital expenditures for fiscal year 2019.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
Contractual Obligations
We have remained free of interest-bearing debt (excluding capital leases) for twenty-nine of the last thirty years (with fiscal year 2014 being the only exception) and had no other debt or other contractual obligations within the meaning of Item 303(a)(5) of Regulation S-K, as of November 2, 2018.
Our expected future liability related to construction of the new Chicago processing facility for the purchase of smokehouses and chillers is approximately $14,600 as of November 30, 2018.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenues and expenses during the respective reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Amounts estimated related to liabilities for self-insured workers’ compensation, employee healthcare and pension benefits are especially subject to inherent uncertainties and these estimated liabilities may ultimately settle at amounts not originally estimated. We record promotions, returns allowances, bad debt and inventory allowances based on recent and historical trends. Management believes its current estimates are reasonable and based on the best information available at the time.
Disclosure concerning our policies on credit risk, revenue recognition, cash surrender or contract value for life insurance policies, deferred income tax and the recoverability of our long-lived assets are provided in Notes 1 and 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements and Regulations
Various accounting standard-setting bodies have been active in soliciting comments and issuing statements, interpretations and exposure drafts. For information on new accounting pronouncements and the impact, if any, on our financial position or results of operations, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not applicable for a smaller reporting company.
Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The consolidated financial statements required by this Item are set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Report.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
| 16 |
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Our management, with the participation and under the supervision of our Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on this evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Report in their design and operation to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Our management, including our Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.
The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving our stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
We maintain and evaluate a system of internal accounting controls, and a program designed to provide reasonable assurance that our assets are protected and that transactions are performed in accordance with proper authorization and are properly recorded. This system of internal accounting controls is continually reviewed and modified in response to evolving business conditions and operations and to recommendations made by our independent registered public accounting firm. We have established a code of conduct. Our management believes that the accounting and internal control systems provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, and financial information is reliable.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors meets regularly with our financial management and counsel, and with the independent registered public accounting firm engaged by us. Internal accounting controls and the quality of financial reporting are discussed during these meetings. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 16 (Communication with Audit Committees). In addition, the Audit Committee and the independent registered public accounting firm have discussed the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence from our Company and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 “Communicating with Audit Committees Concerning Independence”.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reports
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter covered by this Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In order to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we have undertaken and continue a comprehensive effort, which includes the documentation and review of our internal controls. In order to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we centralized most accounting and many administrative functions at our corporate headquarters in an effort to control the cost of maintaining our control systems.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signed into law by the President on July 21, 2010, permanently exempts small public companies with less than $75 million in public float, such as the Company, from the requirement to obtain an external audit on the effectiveness of internal financial reporting controls provided in Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, an attestation report on internal controls over financial reporting by an independent registered public accounting firm has not been presented. Section 404(a) is still effective for smaller public companies and requires the disclosure of management attestations on internal controls over financial reporting.
| 17 |
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting based on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) and related illustrative documents as an update to Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992). Management determined that the 17 principles were present and functioning during its assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for our fiscal year ended November 2, 2018. Based on management’s assessment and the above-referenced criteria, management believes that the internal control over financial reporting for our fiscal year ended November 2, 2018 was effective.
Not applicable.
| 18 |
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item will be included in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended November 2, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference. Information concerning our executive officers is set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Report under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant”.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item will be included in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended November 2, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item will be included in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended November 2, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Not applicable, as we do not have any compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item will be included in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended November 2, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.
We are considered a “controlled company” within the meaning of Rule 5615(c)(1) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules based on the approximate 80% beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock by Bridgford Industries Incorporated and are therefore exempted from various NASDAQ Listing Rules pertaining to certain “independence” requirements of our directors. Nevertheless, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Andrews, Scott and Zippwald who together comprise the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee, are all “independent directors” within the meaning of Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
Our general legal counsel is the son of the former senior chairman of the Board of Directors. As legal counsel to the Board and the Compensation Committee, he currently is paid a fee of $2,300 for each meeting attended. Total fees paid under this arrangement for fiscal year 2018 were approximately $22,600. Legal services are performed on our behalf and billed by a firm in which he is a partner. Total fees billed under this arrangement for fiscal year 2018 were approximately $172,600.
Director Allan Bridgford Jr., son of the former senior chairman of the Board of Directors, is providing consulting services to the Chicago plant and management. The contract on behalf of the Company with Allan Bridgford Jr. is for consulting services at $1,200 per day. Total fees billed under this arrangement for fiscal year 2018 were approximately $219,000. As a member of the Board of Directors, he was paid a fee of $2,300 for each meeting attended during fiscal year 2018. Total fees paid under this arrangement for fiscal year 2018 were $22,600. Under an arrangement with Allan Bridgford Jr., we accrued approximately $420,700 of profit sharing based on fiscal year 2018 profitability to be paid out in three installments equally over the next three years.
Director Keith Ross currently provides real estate consulting services to the Board and management. He was paid a fee of $2,300 for each Board meeting attended and was paid an aggregate of $20,300 for meetings attended during fiscal year 2018. Total fees paid during fiscal year 2018 for consulting services were $51,300.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item will be included in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended November 2, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.
| 19 |
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements. The following documents are filed as a part of this Report:
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Not applicable for a smaller reporting company.
(3) Exhibits
(a) The exhibits below are filed or incorporated herein by reference.
Not applicable.
| 20 |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION | ||
| By: | /s/ WILLIAM L. BRIDGFORD | |
| William L. Bridgford | ||
| Chairman of the Board | ||
Date: January 18, 2019
We, the undersigned directors and officers of Bridgford Foods Corporation, do hereby constitute and appoint William L. Bridgford and Raymond F. Lancy, or either of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, our true and lawful attorneys and agents, to do any and all acts and things in our name and behalf in our capacities as directors and officers and to execute any and all instruments for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, which said attorneys and agents, or either of them, or their substitutes, may deem necessary or advisable to enable said corporation to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including specifically, but without limitation, power and authority to sign for us or any of us in our names and in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments; and we do hereby ratify and confirm all that the said attorneys and agents, or either of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ WILLIAM L. BRIDGFORD | Chairman of the Board | January 18, 2019 | ||
| William L. Bridgford | (Principal Executive Officer) | |||
| /s/ JOHN V. SIMMONS | President & Director | January 18, 2019 | ||
| John V. Simmons | ||||
| Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, | ||||
| /s/ RAYMOND F. LANCY | Treasurer & Director | January 18, 2019 | ||
| Raymond F. Lancy | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |||
| /s/ BRUCE H. BRIDGFORD | Director | January 18, 2019 | ||
| Bruce H. Bridgford | ||||
| /s/ TODD C. ANDREWS | Director | January 18, 2019 | ||
| Todd C. Andrews | ||||
| /s/ ALLAN BRIDGFORD JR. | Director | January 18, 2019 | ||
| Allan Bridgford Jr. | ||||
| /s/ D. GREGORY SCOTT | Director | January 18, 2019 | ||
| D. Gregory Scott | ||||
| /s/ KEITH A. ROSS | Director | January 18, 2019 | ||
| Keith A. Ross | ||||
| /s/ PAUL R. ZIPPWALD | Director | January 18, 2019 | ||
| Paul R. Zippwald |
| 21 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Bridgford Foods Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bridgford Foods Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Squar Milner LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2009.
Irvine, California
January 18, 2019
| 22 |
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION
November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
| 2018 | 2017 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 8,179 | $ | 12,109 | ||||
| Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $33 and $30, respectively and promotional allowances of $2,122 and $2,537, respectively | 20,293 | 19,148 | ||||||
| Inventories, net | 23,413 | 23,016 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses | 1,331 | 1,550 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 53,216 | 55,823 | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $66,337 and $63,722, respectively | 32,638 | 18,571 | ||||||
| Other non-current assets | 11,630 | 13,111 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 4,010 | 10,040 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 101,494 | $ | 97,545 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 7,655 | $ | 5,365 | ||||
| Accrued payroll, advertising and other expenses | 4,577 | 4,555 | ||||||
| Income taxes payable | 155 | 216 | ||||||
| Current portion of non-current liabilities | 5,980 | 6,108 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 18,367 | 16,244 | ||||||
| Non-current liabilities | 17,447 | 25,263 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 35,814 | 41,507 | ||||||
| Contingencies and commitments (Notes 3, 5 and 6) | ||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, without par value; Authorized, - 1,000 shares; issued and outstanding – none | - | - | ||||||
| Common stock, $1.00 par value; Authorized, - 20,000 shares; issued and outstanding – 9,076 and 9,076 | 9,134 | 9,134 | ||||||
| Capital in excess of par value | 8,298 | 8,298 | ||||||
| Retained earnings | 65,948 | 56,902 | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (17,700 | ) | (18,296 | ) | ||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 65,680 | 56,038 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 101,494 | $ | 97,545 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| 23 |
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the fiscal years ended November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| November 2, 2018 | November 3, 2017 | |||||||
| (52 Weeks) | (53 Weeks) | |||||||
| Net sales | $ | 174,257 | $ | 167,223 | ||||
| Cost of products sold | 117,751 | 105,637 | ||||||
| Gross margin | 56,506 | 61,586 | ||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 49,929 | 48,816 | ||||||
| Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | (6,236 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||
| Income before taxes | 12,813 | 12,828 | ||||||
| Provision for income taxes | 6,296 | 3,999 | ||||||
| Net income | $ | 6,517 | $ | 8,829 | ||||
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.97 | ||||
| Shares used to compute basic earnings per share | 9,076,832 | 9,076,832 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| 24 |
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the fiscal years ended November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017
(in thousands)
| November 2, 2018 | November 3, 2017 | |||||||
| (52 Weeks) | (53 Weeks) | |||||||
| Net income | $ | 6,517 | $ | 8,829 | ||||
| Other comprehensive income from defined benefit plans | 3,610 | 12,832 | ||||||
| Other postretirement benefit plans: | ||||||||
| Actuarial gain | 710 | 641 | ||||||
| Prior service benefit | (174 | ) | (190 | ) | ||||
| Other comprehensive income from other postretirement benefit plans, net | 536 | 451 | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income, before taxes | 4,146 | 13,283 | ||||||
| Tax expense on other comprehensive income | (1,021 | ) | (4,983 | ) | ||||
| Change in other comprehensive income, net of tax | 3,125 | 8,300 | ||||||
| Comprehensive income, net of tax | $ | 9,642 | $ | 17,129 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| 25 |
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the fiscal years ended November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017
(in thousands)
| Shares | Amount | Capital in excess of par value | Retained earnings | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | Total shareholders’ equity | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, October 28, 2016 | 9,076 | $ | 9,134 | $ | 8,298 | $ | 48,073 | $ | (26,596 | ) | $ | 38,909 | ||||||||||||
| Net income | 8,829 | 8,829 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net change in defined benefit plans and other benefit plans | 8,300 | 8,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, November 3, 2017 | 9,076 | $ | 9,134 | $ | 8,298 | $ | 56,902 | $ | (18,296 | ) | $ | 56,038 | ||||||||||||
| Net income | 6,517 | 6,517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ASU 2018-02 (Note 1) | 2,529 | (2,529 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net change in defined benefit plans and other benefit plans | 3,125 | 3,125 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, November 2, 2018 | 9,076 | $ | 9,134 | $ | 8,298 | $ | 65,948 | $ | (17,700 | ) | $ | 65,680 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| 26 |
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the fiscal years ended November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017
(in thousands)
| November 2, 2018 | November 3, 2017 | |||||||
| (52 Weeks) | (53 Weeks) | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net income | $ | 6,517 | $ | 8,829 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation | 3,940 | 3,366 | ||||||
| Provision for losses on accounts receivable | 24 | 26 | ||||||
| Provision for (reduction in) promotional allowances | 94 | (266 | ) | |||||
| Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | (6,236 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||
| Deferred income taxes, net | 4,940 | (490 | ) | |||||
| Tax valuation allowance | - | (77 | ) | |||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts receivable | (1,263 | ) | (2,326 | ) | ||||
| Inventories | (397 | ) | 1,065 | |||||
| Prepaid expenses | 219 | (613 | ) | |||||
| Refundable income taxes | - | (703 | ) | |||||
| Other non-current assets | 1,549 | 1,443 | ||||||
| Accounts payable | 2,291 | 1,280 | ||||||
| Accrued payroll, advertising and other expenses | 22 | 466 | ||||||
| Income taxes payable | (61 | ) | 85 | |||||
| Current portion of non-current liabilities | 295 | 1,916 | ||||||
| Non-current liabilities | (3,669 | ) | 2,826 | |||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 8,265 | 16,769 | ||||||
| Cash used in investing activities: | ||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 6,035 | 58 | ||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | (18,147 | ) | (11,574 | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (12,112 | ) | (11,516 | ) | ||||
| Cash used in financing activities: | ||||||||
| Payment of capital lease obligations | (83 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (83 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (3,930 | ) | 5,124 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 12,109 | 6,985 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 8,179 | $ | 12,109 | ||||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||
| Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 1,726 | $ | 4,365 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| 27 |
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands except share and per share amounts, time periods, ratios and percentages)
NOTE 1 - The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Bridgford Foods Corporation was organized in 1952. We originally began operations in 1932 as a retail meat market in San Diego, California and evolved into a meat wholesaler for hotels and restaurants, a distributor of frozen food products, a processor and packer of meat, and a manufacturer and distributor of frozen food products for sale on a retail and wholesale basis. We and our subsidiaries are primarily engaged in the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of an extensive line of frozen, refrigerated, and snack food products throughout the United States.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. All inter-company transactions have been eliminated.
Use of estimates and assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the respective reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Amounts estimated related to liabilities for pension benefits, self-insured workers’ compensation and employee healthcare benefits are subject to inherent uncertainties and these estimated liabilities may ultimately settle at amounts which may vary from current estimates. Other areas with underlying estimates include realization of deferred tax assets, cash surrender or contract value of life insurance policies, promotional allowances and the allowance for doubtful accounts and inventory reserves. Management believes its current estimates are reasonable and based on the best information available at the time.
We test long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If an impairment is indicated, we measure the fair value of assets to determine if and when adjustments are recorded.
Subsequent events
Management has evaluated events subsequent to November 2, 2018 through the date the accompanying consolidated financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for transactions and other events that may require adjustment of and/or disclosure in such financial statements. On December 26, 2018, we entered into a master collateral loan and security agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A for up to $15,000 in equipment financing. Pursuant to the loan agreement, we borrowed $7,500 to purchase specific equipment for our new Chicago processing facility at a fixed rate of 4.13% per annum. The loan term is seven years and is secured by the purchased equipment. The funds were received on December 28, 2018. The master collateral loan and security agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. contains various affirmative and negative covenants that limit the use of funds and define other provisions of the loan. The main financial covenants are listed below:
| ● | Total Liabilities divided by Tangible Net Worth not greater than 2.5 to 1.0 at each fiscal quarter, | |
| ● | Quick Ratio not less than 1.0 to 1.0 at each fiscal quarter end, | |
| ● | Net income after taxes not less than one dollar on a quarterly basis, determined as of each fiscal quarter end. |
Based on management’s review, no other material events were identified that require adjustment to the financial statements or additional disclosure.
Concentrations of credit risk
Our credit risk is diversified across a broad range of customers and geographic regions. Losses due to credit risk have recently been immaterial. The carrying amount of cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair market value due to the short maturity of these instruments. We maintain cash balances at financial institutions, which may at times exceed the amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Management does not believe there is significant credit risk associated with these financial institutions. The provision for doubtful accounts receivable is based on historical trends and current collectability risk.
We have significant accounts receivable with a few large, well known customers which, although historically secure, could be subject to material risk should these customers’ operations suddenly deteriorate. Sales to Wal-Mart® comprised 36.5% of revenues in fiscal year 2018 and 31.3% of total accounts receivable was due from Wal-Mart® as of November 2, 2018. Sales to Wal-Mart® comprised 37.7% of revenues in fiscal year 2017 and 36.5% of total accounts receivable was due from Wal-Mart as of ® November 3, 2017. Sales to Dollar General® comprised 9.6% of revenues in fiscal year 2018 and 23.5% of total accounts receivable was due from Dollar General® as of November 2, 2018.
| 28 |
Business segments
Our company and subsidiaries operate in two business segments - the processing and distribution of frozen foods products, and the processing and distribution of snack food products. See Note 7 for further information.
Fiscal year
We maintain our accounting records on a 52-53-week fiscal basis ending on the Friday closest to October 31. As part of the regular accounting cycle, fiscal year 2018 included 52 weeks and fiscal year 2017 included 53 weeks.
Revenues
Revenues are recognized upon passage of title to the customer, typically upon product pick-up, shipment or delivery to customers. Products are delivered to customers primarily through our own long-haul fleet or through a Company owned direct store delivery system. These delivery costs, $3,883 and $3,556 for fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
We record promotional and returns allowances based on recent and historical trends. Revenue is recognized as the net amount estimated to be received after deducting estimated amounts for discounts, trade allowances and product returns. Promotional allowances, including customer incentive and trade promotion activities, are recorded as a reduction to sales based on amounts estimated being due to customers, based primarily on historical utilization and redemption rates. Promotional allowances deducted from sales for fiscal years 2018 and 2017 were $8,840 and $9,123, respectively.
Advertising expenses
Advertising and other promotional expenses are recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses. Advertising expenses for fiscal years 2018 and 2017 were $2,713 and $2,403, respectively.
Cash and cash equivalents
We consider all investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include money market funds and treasury bills. Cash equivalents totaled $8,179 as of November 2, 2018 and $12,109 as of November 3, 2017. All material cash and cash equivalents as of November 2, 2018 were held at Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Fair value measurements
We classify levels of inputs to measure the fair value of financial assets as follows:
| ● | Level 1 inputs: Level 1 inputs are quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date. |
| ● | Level 2 inputs: Level 2 inputs are from other than quoted market prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. |
| ● | Level 3 inputs: Level 3 inputs are unobservable and should be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available. |
The hierarchy noted above requires us to minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to use observable market data, if available, when determining fair value.
The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis for the fiscal years ended November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis) or net realizable value. Inventories include the cost of raw materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and write down any excess or obsolete inventories to net realizable value. An inventory reserve is created when potentially slow-moving or obsolete inventories are identified in order to reflect the appropriate inventory value. Changes in economic conditions, production requirements, and lower than expected customer demand could result in additional obsolete or slow-moving inventory that cannot be sold or must be sold at reduced prices and could result in additional reserve provisions.
| 29 |
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Major renewals and improvements are charged to the asset accounts while the cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as incurred. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to income. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over 10 to 20 years for buildings and improvements, 5 to 10 years for machinery and equipment, and 3 to 5 years for transportation equipment. We are building a processing plant from the ground up and as such have attributed longer useful lives to these types of assets employed at the new facility in Chicago.
Capital leases
Leased property and equipment that meet capital lease criteria are capitalized at the lower of the present value of the minimum payments required under the lease or the fair value of the asset at inception of the lease and are included within property, plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet. If any, obligations under capital leases are accounted for as current and noncurrent liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Amortization is calculated on a straight-line method based upon the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term.
Life insurance policies
We record the cash surrender value or contract value for life insurance policies as an adjustment of premiums paid in determining the expense or income to be recognized under the contract for the period. The cash surrender value is included in other non-current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Income taxes
Deferred taxes are provided for items whose financial and tax bases differ. A valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is expected that it is more likely than not that the related asset will not be fully realized. The determination as to whether or not a deferred tax asset can be fully realized is subject to a significant degree of judgment, based at least partially upon a projection of future taxable income, which takes into consideration past and future trends in profitability, customer demand, supply costs, and multiple other factors, none of which are predictable.
We provide tax accruals for federal, state and local exposures relating to audit results, tax planning initiatives and compliance responsibilities. The development of these accruals requires judgments about tax issues, potential outcomes and timing. (See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Although the outcome of these tax audits is uncertain, in management’s opinion adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for potential liabilities emanating from these reviews. If actual outcomes differ materially from these estimates, they could have a material impact on our results of operations.
Stock-based compensation
We measure and recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, in the financial statements based on the fair value at the date of the grant. We have not issued, awarded, granted or entered into any stock-based payment agreements since April 29, 1999.
Comprehensive income or loss
Comprehensive income or loss consists of net income and additional minimum pension liability adjustments.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements and regulations
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” to supersede previous revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP. The guidance presents a single five-step model for comprehensive revenue recognition that requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Two options are available for implementation of the standard which are either the retrospective approach or cumulative effect adjustment approach. The guidance becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, with early adoption permitted. The Company anticipates using the modified retrospective transition method beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The Company is completing its evaluation of the full impact of adoption of this guidance and does not presently expect adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements aside from more detailed and improved disclosure requirements.
| 30 |
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory”. The guidance is part of the “Simplification Initiative” to identify and re-evaluate areas where the generally accepted accounting principles may be complex and cumbersome to apply. The guidance requires that inventory be stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value as opposed to the lower of cost or market. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price for the inventory less completion, disposal and transportation costs. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” that requires most equity investments to be measured at fair value and subsequent changes in fair value to be recognized in net income. The guidance covers presentation and disclosure requirements of financial liabilities and the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating this statement and its impact on its results of operations or financial position.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”, which will require a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities with lease terms of more than 12 months. Both capital and operating leases will need to be recognized on the balance sheet. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating this statement and its impact on its results of operations or financial position.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 “Compensation-Stock Compensation” guidance which simplifies various aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income tax consequences, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification of related amounts within the statement of cash flows. Adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 did not have a material impact on results of Company operations or financial position.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. The guidance involves eight specific cash flow issues and aims to unify accounting for these transactions. The guidance becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and its impact on its results of operations or financial position.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits”. The guidance separates service cost from other pension cost components changing the presentation of net periodic benefit cost related to company sponsored defined benefit or other postretirement benefits. The guidance becomes effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and its impact on its results of operations or financial position.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, “Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”. The guidance allows reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the application of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early adopt this guidance during the quarter ended January 26, 2018. Adoption of this guidance had a material impact on retained earnings and other comprehensive income (see the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity contained in this Report).
| 31 |
NOTE 2 - Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions:
| 2018 | 2017 | |||||||
| Inventories, net: | ||||||||
| Meat, ingredients and supplies | $ | 6,455 | $ | 5,409 | ||||
| Work in process | 1,415 | 1,501 | ||||||
| Finished goods | 15,543 | 16,106 | ||||||
| $ | 23,413 | $ | 23,016 | |||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net: | ||||||||
| Land | $ | 3,908 | $ | 3,853 | ||||
| Buildings and improvements | 21,665 | 19,944 | ||||||
| Machinery and equipment | 57,593 | 50,352 | ||||||
| Capital leased trucks | 404 | 1,060 | ||||||
| Transportation equipment | 6,981 | 6,436 | ||||||
| Construction in process | 8,424 | 648 | ||||||
| 98,975 | 82,293 | |||||||
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (66,337 | ) | (63,722 | ) | ||||
| $ | 32,638 | $ | 18,571 | |||||
| Other non-current assets: | ||||||||
| Cash surrender value benefits | $ | 11,624 | $ | 13,105 | ||||
| Other | 6 | 6 | ||||||
| $ | 11,630 | $ | 13,111 | |||||
| Accrued payroll, advertising and other expenses: | ||||||||
| Payroll, vacation, payroll taxes and employee benefits | $ | 3,326 | $ | 3,252 | ||||
| Accrued advertising and broker commissions | 489 | 576 | ||||||
| Property taxes | 517 | 450 | ||||||
| Other | 245 | 277 | ||||||
| $ | 4,577 | $ | 4,555 | |||||
| Current portion of non-current liabilities (Notes 3 and 6): | ||||||||
| Defined benefit retirement plan | $ | 1,150 | $ | 1,150 | ||||
| Executive retirement plans | 10 | 10 | ||||||
| Incentive compensation | 4,796 | 4,502 | ||||||
| Capital lease obligation | - | 424 | ||||||
| Customer deposits | 10 | 9 | ||||||
| Postretirement healthcare benefits | 14 | 13 | ||||||
| $ | 5,980 | $ | 6,108 | |||||
| Non-current liabilities (Note 3): | ||||||||
| Defined benefit retirement plan | $ | 6,903 | $ | 13,122 | ||||
| Executive retirement plans | 5,553 | 5,598 | ||||||
| Incentive compensation | 4,487 | 6,028 | ||||||
| Postretirement healthcare benefits | 504 | 515 | ||||||
| $ | 17,447 | $ | 25,263 | |||||
NOTE 3 - Retirement and Other Benefit Plans:
Noncontributory-Trusteed Defined Benefit Retirement Plans for Sales, Administrative, Supervisory and Certain Other Employees
We have noncontributory-trusteed defined benefit retirement plans for sales, administrative, supervisory and certain other employees. In the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, we froze future benefit accruals under these plans for employees classified within the administrative, sales or supervisory job classifications or within any non-bargaining class. The benefits under these plans are primarily based on years of service and compensation levels. The funding policy of the plans requires contributions which are at least equal to the minimum required contributions needed to avoid a funding deficiency. The measurement date for the plans is our fiscal year end.
| 32 |
Net pension cost consisted of the following:
| November 2, 2018 | November 3, 2017 | |||||||
| (52 Weeks) | (53 Weeks) | |||||||
| Service cost | $ | 126 | $ | 131 | ||||
| Interest cost | 2,248 | 2,196 | ||||||
| Expected return on plan assets | (3,408 | ) | (2,901 | ) | ||||
| Amortization of unrecognized loss | 1,575 | 2,412 | ||||||
| Net pension cost | $ | 541 | $ | 1,838 | ||||
Net pension costs and benefit obligations are determined using assumptions as of the beginning of each fiscal year.
Weighted average assumptions for each fiscal year are as follows:
| 2018 | 2017 | |||||||
| Discount rate | 4.30 | % | 3.65 | % | ||||
| Rate of increase in salary levels | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| Expected return on plan assets | 7.00 | % | 7.00 | % | ||||
The benefit obligation, plan assets, and funded status of these plans as of the fiscal years ended are as follows:
| November 2, 2018 | November 3, 2017 | |||||||
| (52 Weeks) | (53 Weeks) | |||||||
| Change in plan assets: | ||||||||
| Fair value of plan assets - beginning of year | $ | 48,208 | $ | 41,871 | ||||
| Employer contributions | 3,150 | 1,150 | ||||||
| Actual return on plan assets | (242 | ) | 6,853 | |||||
| Benefits paid | (1,682 | ) | (1,666 | ) | ||||
| Fair value of plan assets - end of year | $ | 49,434 | $ | 48,208 | ||||
| Change in benefit obligations: | ||||||||
| Benefit obligations - beginning of year | $ | 62,480 | $ | 68,287 | ||||
| Service cost | 126 | 131 | ||||||
| Interest cost | 2,248 | 2,196 | ||||||
| Actuarial gain | (5,686 | ) | (6,468 | ) | ||||
| Benefits paid | (1,681 | ) | (1,666 | ) | ||||
| Benefit obligations - end of year | 57,487 | 62,480 | ||||||
| Funded status of the plans | (8,053 | ) | (14,272 | ) | ||||
| Unrecognized prior service costs | - | - | ||||||
| Unrecognized net actuarial loss | 16,821 | 20,431 | ||||||
| Net amount recognized | $ | 8,768 | $ | 6,159 | ||||
We perform an internal rate of return analysis when making the discount rate selection. The discount rates were based on Citigroup Pension Liability Index as of September 30, 2018 and October 31, 2017, respectively.
Plan assets are primarily invested in marketable equity securities, corporate and government debt securities and are administered by an investment management company. The plans’ long-term return on assets is based on the weighted-average of the plans’ investment allocation as of the measurement date and the published historical returns for those types of asset categories, taking into consideration inflation rate forecasts. We contributed $2,000 more than our expected employer contribution to the plans in fiscal 2018 as part of a tax planning strategy. Our expected employer contribution to the plans in fiscal year 2019 is $1,150.
For fiscal year 2018, our actuary updated mortality tables from the RP-2014 Mortality Total Dataset, adjusted to 2006 with Scale MP-2016, Scaling to RP-2014 Mortality Total Dataset, adjusted to 2006, with MP-2017 Scaling. The expected rate of return on plan assets remained the same at 7.00% effective for fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively.
| 33 |
The actual and target allocation for plan assets are as follows:
| Asset Class | 2018 | Target Asset Allocation | 2017 | Target Asset Allocation | ||||||||||||
| Large Cap Equities | 21.4 | % | 22.0 | % | 29.7 | % | 30.0 | % | ||||||||
| Mid Cap Equities | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
| Small Cap Equities | 13.0 | % | 12.0 | % | 13.2 | % | 12.0 | % | ||||||||
| International (equities only) | 24.7 | % | 26.0 | % | 22.9 | % | 23.0 | % | ||||||||
| Fixed Income | 39.0 | % | 39.0 | % | 32.2 | % | 33.0 | % | ||||||||
| Other (Government/Corporate, Bonds) | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
| Cash | 1.9 | % | 1.0 | % | 2.0 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
The fair value of our pension plan assets as of November 2, 2018 and the level under which fair values were determined, using the hierarchy described in Note 1, is as follows:
| 2018 | ||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| Total plan assets | $ | 49,434 | - | - | $ | 49,434 | ||||||||||
Expected payments for the pension benefits are as follows:
| Fiscal Years | Pension Benefits |
|||
| 2019 | $ | 2,304 | ||
| 2020 | $ | 2,234 | ||
| 2021 | $ | 2,602 | ||
| 2022 | $ | 2,772 | ||
| 2023 | $ | 3,203 | ||
| 2024-2028 | $ | 16,576 | ||
Executive Retirement Plans
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Effective January 1, 1991, we adopted a deferred compensation savings plan for certain key employees. Under this arrangement, selected employees contribute a portion of their annual compensation to the plan. We contribute an amount to each participant’s account by computing an investment return equal to Moody’s Average Seasoned Bond Rate plus 2%. Employees receive vested amounts upon death, termination or attainment of retirement age. No benefit expense was recorded under this plan for fiscal years 2018 and 2017.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
In fiscal year 1991, we adopted a non-qualified supplemental retirement plan for certain key employees. Benefits provided under the plan are equal to 60% of the employee’s final average earnings, less amounts provided by our defined benefit pension plan and amounts available through Social Security.
| 34 |
Benefits payable related to these plans and included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements were $5,563 and $5,608 as of November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017, respectively. In connection with these arrangements we are the beneficiary of life insurance policies on the lives of certain key employees and retirees. The aggregate cash surrender value of these policies, included in non-current assets, was $11,624 and $13,105 as of November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017, respectively.
Expected payments for executive postretirement benefits are as follows:
| Fiscal Years | Executive Postretirement Benefits |
|||
| 2019 | $ | 177 | ||
| 2020 | $ | 524 | ||
| 2021 | $ | 524 | ||
| 2022 | $ | 524 | ||
| 2023 | $ | 524 | ||
| 2024-2028 | $ | 2,619 | ||
Incentive Compensation Plan for Certain Key Executives
We provide an incentive compensation plan for certain key executives, which is based upon our pretax income. The payment of these amounts is generally deferred over three or five-year periods. The total amount payable related to this arrangement was $9,283 and $10,530 as of November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017, respectively. Future payments are approximately $4,796, $3,140, $1,183, $113 and $51 for fiscal years 2019 through 2023, respectively.
Postretirement Healthcare Benefits for Selected Executive Employees
We provide postretirement health care benefits for selected executive employees. Net periodic postretirement healthcare (benefit) cost is determined using assumptions as of the beginning of each fiscal year, except for the total actual benefit payments and the discount rate used to develop the net periodic postretirement benefit expense, which is determined at the end of the fiscal year.
Net periodic postretirement healthcare (benefit) consisted of the following:
| November 2. 2018 | November 3. 2017 | |||||||
| (52 Weeks) | (53 Weeks) | |||||||
| Service cost | $ | 13 | $ | 13 | ||||
| Interest cost | 18 | 17 | ||||||
| Amortization of prior service cost | (132 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||
| Amortization of actuarial gain | (41 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||
| Net periodic postretirement healthcare (benefit) | $ | (142 | ) | $ | (160 | ) | ||
Weighted average assumptions for the fiscal years ended November 2, 2018 and November 3, 2017 are as follows:
| 2018 | 2017 | |||||||
| Discount rate | 4.30 | % | 3.51 | % | ||||
| Medical trend rate next year | 8.00 | % | 8.50 | % | ||||
| Ultimate trend rate | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||
| Year ultimate trend rate is achieved | 2022 | 2022 | ||||||
The table below shows the estimated effect of a 1% increase in healthcare cost trend rate on the following:
| 2018 | 2017 | |||||||
| Interest cost plus service cost | $ | 4 | $ | 4 | ||||
| Accumulated postretirement healthcare obligation | $ | 54 | $ | 64 | ||||
The table below shows the estimated effect of a 1% decrease in healthcare cost trend rate on the following:
| 2018 | 2017 | |||||||
| Interest cost plus service cost | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | ||
| Accumulated postretirement healthcare obligation | $ | (45 | ) | $ | (53 | ) | ||
| 35 |
The healthcare obligation and funded status of this plan as of the fiscal years ended are as follows:
| 2018 | 2017 | |||||||
| Change in accumulated postretirement healthcare obligation: | ||||||||
| Healthcare obligation - beginning of year | $ | 528 | $ | 511 | ||||
| Service cost | 13 | 13 | ||||||
| Interest cost | 18 | 17 | ||||||
| Actuarial gain | (40 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
| Benefits paid | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
| Healthcare obligation – end of year | $ | 517 | $ | 528 | ||||
| Funded status of the plans | 517 | 528 | ||||||
| Unrecognized prior service costs | (44 | ) | (176 | ) | ||||
| Unrecognized net actuarial gain | (109 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||
| Unrecognized amounts recorded in other comprehensive income | 153 | 286 | ||||||
| Postretirement healthcare liability | $ | 517 | $ | 528 | ||||
Expected payments for the postretirement benefits are as follows:
| Fiscal Years | Postretirement Healthcare Benefits |
|||
| 2019 | $ | 57 | ||
| 2020 | $ | 84 | ||
| 2021 | $ | 66 | ||
| 2022 | $ | 46 | ||
| 2023-2027 | $ | 111 | ||
401(K) Plan for Sales, Administrative, Supervisory and Certain Other Employees
During the fiscal year ended November 3, 2006, we implemented a qualified 401(K) retirement plan (the “401K Plan”) for our sales, administrative, supervisory and certain other employees. During fiscal years 2018 and 2017, we made total employer contributions to the 401K Plan in the amounts of $660 and $599, respectively.
NOTE 4 - Income Taxes:
The provision for income taxes includes the following:
| November 2, 2018 | November 3, 2017 | |||||||
| (52 Weeks) | (53 Weeks) | |||||||
| Current: | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | 979 | $ | 4,039 | ||||
| State | 377 | 450 | ||||||
| 1,356 | 4,489 | |||||||
| Deferred: | ||||||||
| Federal | 4,715 | (321 | ) | |||||
| State | 225 | (169 | ) | |||||
| 4,940 | (490 | ) | ||||||
| $ | 6,296 | $ | 3,999 | |||||
| 36 |
The total tax provision differs from the expected amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes as follows:
| November 2, 2018 | November 3, 2017 | |||||||
| (52 Weeks) | (53 Weeks) | |||||||
| Provision for federal income taxes at the applicable statutory rate | $ | 2,956 | $ | 4,373 | ||||
| Increase in provision resulting from state income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | 463 | 108 | ||||||
| Change in federal rate – Tax Act | 3,059 | - | ||||||
| Non-taxable life insurance gain | (99 | ) | (459 | ) | ||||
| Domestic Production Activities Deduction | (106 | ) | (375 | ) | ||||
| Change in valuation allowance | - | 77 | ||||||
| Other, net | 23 | 275 | ||||||
| $ | 6,296 | $ | 3,999 | |||||
Deferred income taxes result from differences in the bases of assets and liabilities for tax and accounting purposes.
| 2018 | 2017 | |||||||
| Receivables allowance | $ | 9 | $ | 12 | ||||
| Returns allowance | 112 | 264 | ||||||
| Inventory packaging reserve | 35 | 129 | ||||||
| Inventory overhead capitalization | 305 | 480 | ||||||
| Employee benefits | 385 | 544 | ||||||
| Other | - | 1 | ||||||
| State taxes | (230 | ) | (420 | ) | ||||
| Incentive compensation | 2,174 | 3,399 | ||||||
| Pension and health care benefits | 3,494 | 7,736 | ||||||
| Depreciation | (2,274 | ) | (2,105 | ) | ||||
| Net operating loss carry-forward and credits | 77 | 77 | ||||||
| Valuation allowance established against state NOL | (77 | ) | (77 | ) | ||||
| Non-current tax assets, net | $ | 4,010 | $ | 10,040 | ||||
Management is required to evaluate whether a valuation allowance should be established against its deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon taxable income in prior carryback years, estimates of future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and reversals of existing taxable temporary differences.
Management reevaluated the need for a valuation allowance at the end of 2018 and determined that some of its California net operating loss (“NOL”) may not be utilized. Therefore, a valuation allowance of $77 has been retained for such portion of the California NOL. Management has concluded that it is more likely than not that the other deferred tax assets as of November 2, 2018 will be realized.
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act includes significant changes to the U.S. tax code that affected our fiscal year ended November 2, 2018, and future periods, including, but not limited to, (1) reducing the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, (2) bonus depreciation that will allow for full expensing of qualified property in the year placed in service, and (3) the repeal of the domestic production activity deduction beginning with our fiscal year 2019. Section 15 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) stipulates that our fiscal year ended November 2, 2018 will have a blended corporate tax rate of 23.07%, which is based on the applicable tax rates before and after the Tax Act and the number of days in the year.
Under U.S. GAAP, specifically ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, the tax effects of changes in tax laws must be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted, or December 22, 2017, for the Tax Act. ASC Topic 740 also requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be measured at the enacted tax rate expected to apply when temporary differences are to be realized or settled. Thus, at the date of enactment, the Company’s deferred taxes were re-measured based upon the new tax rates.
The Tax Act reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. This results in a blended corporate tax rate of 23.07% in fiscal year 2018 and 21% thereafter. We analyzed our deferred tax balances to estimate which of those balances are expected to reverse in fiscal 2018 or thereafter, and we re-measured the deferred taxes at 23.07% or 21% accordingly. The change in deferred taxes is recorded as an adjustment to our income tax provision, which resulted in a charge totaling $3,059 in fiscal 2018.
The Company adopted ASU 2018-02, “Income Statement-Reporting Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) (Topic 220)” in year ended November 2, 2018. As a result of the remeasurement of deferred tax assets related to the Tax Act, we reclassified $2,529 from Other Comprehensive Income to Retained Earnings.
As of November 2, 2018, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $874 for state purposes. These loss carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2018 through 2033.
As of November 2, 2018, we have provided a liability of $155 to unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax matters. None of this liability will reduce our effective income tax rate if the asset is recognized in future reporting periods. We have not identified any new unrecognized tax benefits.
As of November 3, 2017, we have provided a liability of $135 to unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax matters. None of this liability will reduce our effective income tax rate if the asset is recognized in future reporting periods. We have not identified any new unrecognized tax benefits.
| 37 |
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
November 2, 2018 | November 3, 2017 | |||||||
| (52 Weeks) | (53 Weeks) | |||||||
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 135 | $ | 130 | ||||
| Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 10 | 14 | ||||||
| Additions for tax positions of prior years | - | - | ||||||
| Reductions for tax positions of prior years | 10 | (9 | ) | |||||
| Settlements | - | - | ||||||
| Balance at end of year | $ | 155 | $ | 135 | ||||
We recognize any future accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of November 2, 2018, we had approximately $22 in accrued interest and penalties which is included as a component of the $155 unrecognized tax benefit noted above.
Our federal income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the fiscal years 2015 through 2017.
We are subject to income tax in California and various other state taxing jurisdictions. Our state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the fiscal years ended 2014 through 2017.
We do not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
NOTE 5 - Line of Credit and Borrowing Agreement:
We maintain a line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that expires on March 1, 2020. The line of credit was expanded from $5,000 to $7,500 during the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Under the terms of this line of credit, we may borrow up to $7,500 at an interest rate equal to the bank’s prime rate or Libor plus 1.5%. The borrowing agreement contains various covenants, the more significant of which require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth, a minimum quick ratio, a minimum net income after tax and total capital expenditures less than $7,500. The Company was in violation of the capital expenditure covenant which was subsequently waived by letter dated January 3, 2019. The Company was in compliance with all other covenants as of November 2, 2018. There have been no borrowings under this line of credit during fiscal year 2018.
On December 26, 2018, we entered into a master collateral loan and security agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A for up to $15,000 in equipment financing. Pursuant to the loan agreement, we borrowed $7,500 to purchase specific equipment for our new Chicago processing facility at a fixed rate of 4.13% per annum. The loan term is seven years and is secured by the equipment purchased. The funds were received on December 28, 2018. Our agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. contains various affirmative and negative covenants that limit the use of funds and define other provisions of the loan. The main financial covenants are listed below:
| ● | Total Liabilities divided by Tangible Net Work not greater than 2.5 to 1.0 at each fiscal quarter, | |
| ● | Quick Ratio not less than 1.0 to 1.0 at each fiscal quarter end, | |
| ● | Net income after taxes not less than one dollar on a quarterly basis, determined as of each fiscal quarter end. |
NOTE 6 - Contingencies and Commitments:
We lease warehouse and/or office facilities throughout the United States under month-to-month rental agreements.
We invested in OTR (over-the-road) tractors during fiscal year 2012 financed by a capital lease obligation in the amount of $1,848. The total capital lease obligation was settled as of November 2, 2018 with no remaining lease liability. We bought several of the tractors and converted to month-to-month arrangements on other tractors as needed. We plan to invest in new capital lease arrangements in fiscal year 2019.
| 38 |
NOTE 7 - Segment Information:
We have two reportable operating segments, Frozen Food Products (the processing and distribution of frozen products) and Snack Food Products (the processing and distribution of meat and other convenience foods).
We evaluate each segment’s performance based on revenues and operating income. Selling, general and administrative expenses include corporate accounting, information systems, human resource and marketing management at the corporate level. These activities are allocated to each operating segment based on revenues and/or actual usage.
The following segment information is for the fiscal years ended November 2, 2018 (52 weeks) and November 3, 2017 (53 weeks):
| Segment Information | ||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | Frozen Food Products |
Snack Food Products |
Other | Totals | ||||||||||||
| Net Sales | $ | 47,266 | $ | 126,991 | $ | - | $ | 174,257 | ||||||||
| Cost of products sold | 30,992 | 86,759 | - | 117,751 | ||||||||||||
| Gross margin | 16,274 | 40,232 | - | 56,506 | ||||||||||||
| SG&A | 14,226 | 35,703 | - | 49,929 | ||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | (242 | ) | (17 | ) | (5,977 | ) | (6,236 | ) | ||||||||
| Income before taxes | $ | 2,290 | $ | 4,546 | $ | 5,977 | $ | 12,813 | ||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 11,902 | $ | 64,429 | $ | 25,163 | $ | 101,494 | ||||||||
| Additions to PP&E | $ | 981 | $ | 17,166 | $ | - | $ | 18,147 | ||||||||
| Segment Information | ||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | Frozen Food Products |
Snack Food Products |
Other | Totals | ||||||||||||
| Net Sales | $ | 49,081 | $ | 118,142 | $ | - | $ | 167,223 | ||||||||
| Cost of products sold | 30,177 | 75,460 | - | 105,637 | ||||||||||||
| Gross margin | 18,904 | 42,682 | - | 61,586 | ||||||||||||
| SG&A | 14,734 | 34,082 | - | 48,816 | ||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | (28 | ) | (30 | ) | - | (58 | ) | |||||||||
| Income before taxes | $ | 4,198 | $ | 8,630 | $ | - | $ | 12,828 | ||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 11,826 | $ | 49,511 | $ | 36,208 | $ | 97,545 | ||||||||
| Additions to PP&E | $ | 356 | $ | 11,218 | $ | - | $ | 11,574 | ||||||||
NOTE 8- Unaudited Interim Financial Information:
Not applicable for a smaller reporting company.
| 39 |