Page 1
background image
U
NITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Report on Form 6-K for February 28, 2011
Commission File Number 1-31615
Sasol Limited
1 Sturdee Avenue
Rosebank 2196
South Africa
(Name and address of registrant’s principal executive office)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or
Form 40-F.
Form 20-F __X__ Form 40-F _____
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-
T Rule 101(b)(1): ____
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted
solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-
T Rule 101(b)(7): ____
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted to
furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must furnish and make public
under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the registrant is incorporated, domiciled or legally organized
(the registrant’s “home country”), or under the rules of the home country exchange on which the
registrant’s securities are traded, as long as the report or other document is not a press release, is not
required to be and has not been distributed to the registrant’s security holders, and, if discussing a material
event, has already been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or other Commission filing on EDGAR.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also
thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes _____ No __X__
If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule
12g3-2(b):
82-_______________.
Enclosures: Competition tribunal confirms settlement of section 4 complaint
background image
Sasol Limited
(Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa)
(Registration number 1979/003231/06)
Sasol Ordinary Share codes:
JSE : SOL
NYSE : SSL
Sasol Ordinary ISIN codes:
ZAE000006896
US8038663006
Sasol BEE Ordinary Share code:
JSE : SOLBE1
Sasol BEE Ordinary ISIN code: ZAE000151817
(“Sasol” or “the Company”)
Competition tribunal confirms settlement of section 4 complaint
The Competition Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) today announced that,
in terms of a consent order granted on 24 February 2011, it has
confirmed the settlement agreement (“the Settlement Agreement”)
reached between the Competition Commission (“the Commission”) and
Sasol Polymers, a division of Sasol Chemical Industries Limited.
The Settlement Agreement related to Sasol Polymers’ existing
propylene supply contract with Safripol (“the Supply Agreement”).
On 12 August 2010, the Commission referred a complaint to the
Tribunal, in which it contended that the pricing provisions of
the Supply Agreement gave raise to indirect price fixing between
Sasol Polymers and Safripol. The pricing provisions were,
however, inserted into the Supply Agreement with the knowledge
of the then Competition Board in relation to the proposed merger,
in 1993, of the monomer, polymer and certain other chemicals
operations of Sasol and AECI Limited.
In Sasol Polymers’ view, any contravention of the Competition Act
(Act 89 of 1998), as amended, (the “Act”) as a result of the
Supply Agreement has its origins in these pricing provisions
rather than any intention to contravene the Act. Given the
uncertainty surrounding the legal position in relation to the
pricing formula and the interpretation of section 4(1)(b) of the
Act, it was considered prudent to settle with the Commission by
accepting that the Supply Agreement gave rise to indirect price-
fixing.

As communicated in our press release on the 14
th
of December
2010, in terms of this Settlement Agreement, Sasol Polymers has
agreed to pay a penalty of R 111 690 000, which was subject to
confirmation by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the
Commission's allegations that the pricing formula gave rise to
indirect price fixing.

Sasol Polymers and Safripol have also reached agreement on the
key terms that are to govern the future monomer supply
relationship between the parties, which we consider to be fully
compliant from a competition law perspective.

background image
Norbert Behrens, the Group General Manager: Strategy and Planning
at Sasol, said, "At Sasol we are committed to comply with all
legislation and hence to resolve any competition law issues where
possible. This matter is one of the outstanding competition law
issues and we are pleased that this matter has now been
resolved."
28 February 2011
Johannesburg
Issued by Sponsor: Deutsche Securities (SA) (Pty) Limited








background image
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant, Sasol Limited, has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date: February 28, 2011
By:
/s/ N L Joubert
Name:
Nereus Louis Joubert
Title:
Company Secretary