UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

LOGMEIN, INC.

(Name of the Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Notice of 2018 Annual

Meeting of Stockholders

and Proxy Statement

Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time

Offices of Latham & Watkins LLP

200 Clarendon Street, 27^th Floor

Boston, MA 02116

April 13, 2018

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

We are pleased to invite you to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will take place on Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Eastern Time, at the offices of Latham & Watkins LLP, 200 Clarendon Street, 27th Floor, Boston, MA 02116. Annual Meetings play an important role in maintaining communications and understanding among our management, Board of Directors and stockholders, and we hope you will join us.

On the pages following this letter you will find:

1) The notice of our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which lists the items of business to be considered at the Annual Meeting; and

2) Our 2018 proxy materials, which describe the items of business listed in the notice and provide other information you will likely find useful in deciding how to cast your vote.

We have elected to provide our proxy materials over the Internet under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “notice and access” rules. Consequently, most stockholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials. We will instead send to these stockholders a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) with instructions for accessing the proxy materials, including our proxy statement and Annual Report to Stockholders, and for voting via the Internet. Providing our proxy materials to stockholders electronically allows us to conserve natural resources and reduce our printing and mailing costs related to the distribution of our proxy materials. If you wish to receive paper copies of our proxy materials you may do so by following the instructions contained in the Notice.

The ability to have your vote counted at the Annual Meeting is an important stockholder right. Regardless of the number of shares you hold or whether you plan to attend the meeting, we hope that you will promptly cast your vote. You may vote over the Internet, or, if you received printed proxy materials, by mailing a proxy or voting instruction card. Please review the instructions on each of your voting options described in our proxy statement, as well as in the Notice.

Thank you for your ongoing support and continued interest in LogMeIn.

Sincerely,

William R. Wagner

President & Chief Executive Officer

LOGMEIN, INC.    1

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Be Held on Thursday, May 31, 2018

Notice is hereby given that the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at the offices of Latham & Watkins LLP, 200 Clarendon Street, 27th Floor, Boston, MA 02116, on Thursday, May 31, 2018, at 9:00 AM, Eastern Time, for the following purposes:

1. To elect the three nominees identified in the attached proxy statement as members of our Board of Directors to serve as class III directors for a term of three years;

2. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018;

3. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers; and

4. To transact other business, if any, that may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

We are taking advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow us to furnish proxy materials to you via the Internet. We believe this will allow us to provide you with the information you need in a manner that is convenient and familiar to you, while also helping us lower our costs to deliver these materials and reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.

On or about April 13, 2018, we will mail to our stockholders a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement for our Annual Meeting and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ending December 31, 2017, which contains our audited consolidated financial statements and other information of interest to our stockholders. The Notice will also provide instructions on how to vote online and includes instructions on how to request a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. Stockholders of record at the close of business on our record date, Monday, April 2, 2018, are entitled to receive this Notice and to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and at any adjournments of such meeting. The stock transfer books of LogMeIn will remain open between the record date and the date of the Annual Meeting for any stockholder to examine for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting. These books will also be available to stockholders for any such purpose at the Annual Meeting.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we urge you to cast your vote and submit your proxy as soon as possible by one of the methods below:

1. Vote over the Internet. You may vote your shares by following the Internet voting instructions provided in the Notice you received. Please see the section of this proxy statement entitled “INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING — “How do I vote?” for additional information.

2. Vote by mail. If you received your proxy materials by mail, you may vote by completing and signing the proxy card delivered with those materials and returning it in the postage pre-paid envelope we provided.

3. Vote in person. If you are attending the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, you may vote by delivering a completed proxy card in person or by completing and submitting a ballot, which will be provided at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

If you are a registered stockholder (that is, you hold your shares in your name), you must present valid identification to vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are a beneficial stockholder (that is, your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other holder of record), you will also need to obtain a “legal proxy” from the holder of record to vote at the Annual Meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Michael J. Donahue

As Secretary

2    LOGMEIN, INC.

Table of Contents

LOGMEIN, INC.    3

Proxy Statement Summary

The below summary is intended to highlight certain key information contained in this Proxy Statement. As it is only a summary, it does not contain all of the information that you should consider. We strongly encourage you to read the complete Proxy Statement as well as our 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders before casting your vote.

2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Voting Matters & Board Recommendations

Our Business

LogMeIn simplifies how people connect with each other and the world around them to drive meaningful interactions, deepen relationships, and create better outcomes for individuals and businesses. A market leader in communication and collaboration, identity and access, and customer engagement and support solutions, LogMeIn has millions of customers spanning virtually every country across the globe. LogMeIn is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts with additional locations around the world.

On January 31, 2017, we completed our acquisition of the GoTo family of service offerings, or the GoTo Business, from a wholly–owned subsidiary of Citrix Systems, Inc., or Citrix, via a Reverse Morris Trust transaction, which we refer to herein as the “Merger.” At the effective time of the Merger, Citrix stockholders received shares of LogMeIn common stock in exchange for their shares in the wholly-owned Citrix subsidiary and employees of the Citrix subsidiary were issued LogMeIn restricted stock units in substitution for the cancellation of their outstanding Citrix restricted stock units. As a result, immediately following the effective time of the Merger, Citrix equityholders owned approximately 50.1% of LogMeIn’s common stock on a fully diluted basis. Based on LogMeIn’s closing stock price of $108.10 on January 31, 2017, as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market, the total value of the shares of LogMeIn common stock issued to Citrix equityholders in the Merger was approximately $3 billion.

Since the completion of the Merger, LogMeIn’s revenue has grown from $336 million in fiscal 2016 to over $1 billion on an annualized basis in fiscal 2017 and we added over 1,600 employees (2,760 as of December 31, 2017, compared to 1,124 as of December 31, 2016).

4    LOGMEIN, INC.

Proxy Statement Summary (continued)

Significant 2017 Business Highlights

2017 was a successful and transformative year for LogMeIn. We consistently delivered strong financial results in the face of major change, exceeding our guidance in each of the four quarters while building the foundation for a large SaaS company capable of leveraging our talented employees, our strong product brands and our history of innovation to establish a strong foothold in much larger markets.

Corporate Governance Highlights

We believe that good corporate governance is important to achieve success and to ensure that we are managed for the long-term benefit of our stockholders. We believe that the following corporate governance policies, guidelines and practices adopted by our Board of Directors (“Board” or “Board of Directors”) reflect many current “best practices,” including:

Please see the section entitled “Our Commitment to Corporate Governance,” beginning on page 19 of this Proxy Statement for additional information about our Corporate Governance practices.

LOGMEIN, INC.    5

GoTo Merger Closed January 31, 2017 Creating a Company with: 2.3M subscribers 24M Free Users 2,760 Employees Two-Year Synergy Plan Completed in 11 Months $121M2 Capital Returned to Stockholders Non-GAAP1 $1.024B 2017 Revenue 6% Pro-Forma Growth $373M Adjusted EBITDA 36% Margin $316M Free Cash Flow 31% Margin GAAP $990M 2017 Revenue $210M EBITDA $250M Free Cash Flow

Proxy Statement Summary (continued)

Results of Last Year’s “Say-on-Pay” Vote

At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we conducted our annual non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote. Approximately 96.7% of the votes cast by stockholders on this proposal were cast in support of the 2016 compensation of our named executive officers. While this vote is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors carefully consider the results. Given the strong level of support evidenced by last year’s say-on-pay vote, the Compensation Committee determined that our stockholders were generally supportive of our current executive compensation philosophy and program and decided that no significant changes to our executive compensation program were necessary for 2017. Nevertheless, the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors continue to monitor the executive compensation program to ensure that it continues to align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders.

Please see the section entitled “Executive Compensation Discussion & Analysis — Executive Summary” on page 33 of this Proxy Statement for additional information about our executive compensation program and policies.

Executive Compensation Highlights

Summary of Our 2017 Executive Compensation Program

Our Compensation Committee designs our executive compensation programs with the goal of attracting, retaining and motivating talented executives, while simultaneously promoting the achievement of key financial and strategic performance measures by linking a portion of executive compensation to the achievement of measurable corporate performance goals, and thereby aligning the incentives of our executives with the creation of value for our stockholders.

6    LOGMEIN, INC.

Proxy Statement Summary (continued)

Below, we summarize those executive compensation practices we have implemented to help drive executive performance, as well as practices we have chosen not to implement because we believe such practices do not support our stockholders’ long-term interests:

What We Do

What We Don’t Do

LOGMEIN, INC.    7

Proxy Statement Summary (continued)

Impact of GoTo Merger on our 2017 Executive Compensation Program

On January 31, 2017, we successfully completed our acquisition of the GoTo family of service offerings, or the GoTo Business, from a wholly–owned subsidiary of Citrix Systems, Inc. via a Reverse Morris Trust transaction, which we refer to herein as the “Merger.” The completion of the Merger marked a historic milestone for LogMeIn and quickly transformed the Company into one of the largest pure SaaS companies in the world with annual revenues in excess of $1 billion and more than two million customers spanning virtually every country around the globe. This dramatic change created a completely new profile for LogMeIn – a company with the scale, employees, products and customer base needed to lead large technology markets, deliver enduring revenue growth and expand margins, while returning meaningful capital to our stockholders.

Shortly following the closing of the Merger, our Compensation Committee worked with its independent compensation consultant, Compensia, Inc., to revise the composition of LogMeIn’s existing compensation peer group to reflect LogMeIn’s post-Merger scale, financial profile and competitive environment (see section below entitled “Use of Competitive Market Data”). Once this new post-Merger peer group was established, the Compensation Committee instructed Compensia to provide them with the competitive market data needed to help the Compensation Committee establish executive compensation ranges consistent with the other companies within the post-Merger peer group.

While the completion of the Merger did not change any of our previous executive compensation philosophies, our Compensation Committee did believe that it was important to realign our 2017 executive compensation levels with those of the other companies in our post-Merger peer group, with whom LogMeIn would now be competing with for executive talent. In some cases, this peer group reset resulted in increases to certain elements of our 2017 executive compensation program which were greater than our historical year-over-year increases. However, rather than automatically bring LogMeIn’s executive compensation levels in-line with the total direct compensation opportunity ranges of the other companies within the post-Merger peer group on Day 1, the Compensation Committee elected to evolve LogMeIn’s pre-Merger executive total direct compensation opportunity levels over time to appropriate post-Merger levels by granting our executives a special one-time Merger-related equity award comprised of 50% time-based RSUs with a two-year cliff vesting condition and 50% PRSUs with a performance-based vesting condition tied to the Company’s achievement of a two-year Adjusted EBITDA Margin performance measure, which represented the financial operating measure that most closely resembled the Company’s post-Merger two-year $100 million run rate cost synergy goal, thereby aligning a substantial portion of our named executive officer’s compensation with the creation of value for our stockholders (see section below entitled “Merger-Related February 2017 Executive Equity Awards”).

When considered as a whole, we believe that the increases to our 2017 executive compensation program remained consistent with our historical compensation philosophies and practices and were designed to bring the compensation ranges of our executive officers closer to the compensation ranges of the comparable executive officers at the other companies within our post-Merger peer group.

Summary of Fiscal 2017 Chief Executive Officer Compensation

Mr. Wagner does not receive any compensation for his service as a member of our Board of Directors. Below is a summary of the compensation that Mr. Wagner received during fiscal 2017 for his service as President and Chief Executive Officer:

8    LOGMEIN, INC.

Proxy Statement Summary (continued)

2017 CEO Total Direct Compensation Pay Mix

The Compensation Committee bases its executive compensation decisions on each named executive officer’s total direct compensation opportunity. The total direct compensation opportunities of our named executive officers are generally comprised of a mix of cash compensation, in the form of base salaries and annual cash incentive bonuses, and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards. This total direct compensation mix has been designed so that the elements of variable pay, such as our annual cash incentive bonus awards and equity awards, represent a substantial portion of the total direct compensation opportunity awarded to our named executive officers.

For fiscal 2017, 52% of Mr. Wagner’s total direct compensation opportunity was designed to be “at risk,” by tying a majority of his compensation opportunity to variable pay elements such as long-term equity incentive awards with performance-based vesting conditions (as further described in the section below entitled “Equity Incentive Awards — Fiscal 2017 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards”) and our cash incentive bonus plan, which provides for a variable cash payment based on the Company’s achievement of certain pre-established financial goals. By dedicating a large percentage of our executives’ total direct compensation opportunity to these variable “at risk” pay elements, rather than fixed pay elements like base salary, the Compensation Committee believes that we are able to better link executive incentives with the Company’s performance. The maximum possible value of Mr. Wagner’s 2017 performance-based RSU awards, or PRSU awards, when calculated based on the grant date fair value (i.e., the market value per share of our common stock as represented by the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant) of the maximum number of shares that may be earned under his 2017 PRSU awards, represented 46% of Mr. Wagner’s 2017 total direct compensation opportunity, while 6% of his 2017 total direct compensation opportunity was subject to our cash incentive bonus plan.

In keeping with the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy, the fiscal 2017 equity awards granted to Mr. Wagner were comprised of 50% time-based RSUs and 50% PRSUs. The Compensation Committee believes that including PRSU awards in the total direct compensation opportunities of those executives whose individual performances and decisions have a direct impact on our Company’s performance helps to strengthen our overall pay-for-performance alignment by ensuring that a substantial portion of their compensation is aligned with the creation of value for our stockholders.

The following chart illustrates the breakdown of Mr. Wagner’s total direct compensation pay mix awarded in fiscal 2017:

Please see the Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 33 of this Proxy Statement for a more detailed description of the compensation paid to our CEO and other named executive officers during fiscal 2017.

CEO Target Compensation Mix Restricted Stock Units 42% Salary 6% Target Bonus 6% Performance Stock Units 46% 52% Performace-Based Pay

LOGMEIN, INC.    9

Information about the Annual Meeting and Voting

10    LOGMEIN, INC.

Information about the Annual Meeting and Voting (continued)

LOGMEIN, INC.    11

Information about the Annual Meeting and Voting (continued)

12    LOGMEIN, INC.

Information about the Annual Meeting and Voting (continued)

LOGMEIN, INC.    13

14    LOGMEIN, INC.

Our Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that LogMeIn is properly managed to meet the Company’s stated goals and objectives and that the long-term interests of our stockholders are served. Our Board of Directors currently consists of ten members who are divided into three classes. The members of each class serve for staggered three-year terms. At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms are set to expire will be elected to serve from the time of their election and qualification until the third Annual Meeting following their election. We believe that having a staggered Board of Directors divided by classes is in the best interest of both the company and its stockholders because it provides for greater stability and continuity on our Board of Directors.

The table below provides summary information about the current composition of our Board of Directors:

Our by-laws provide that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of our Board of Directors and that our directors may be removed only for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the votes that all of our stockholders would be entitled to cast in an annual election of directors. Any vacancy on our Board of Directors, including a vacancy resulting from an enlargement of our Board of Directors, may be filled only by vote of a majority of our directors then in office.

Director Biographies and Qualifications

The paragraphs that follow provide information as of the date of this proxy statement about each of our director nominees and current Board members. The information presented includes their length of service as a director of LogMeIn, as well as information each director has given us about their age as of April 2, 2018, current positions held, principal occupation and business experience for the past five years, as well as the names of any other publicly-held companies for which they currently serve as a director or have served as a director during the past five years. There are no family relationships among any of our directors, nominees for director, or executive officers. We have also included information about each nominee’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that led our Board to conclude that they should serve as a director of LogMeIn.

Mr. Cohn will not stand for re-election and his term will expire at this Annual Meeting of Stockholders. His biography has therefore, been omitted.

LOGMEIN, INC.    15

Our Board of Directors (continued)

Director Nominees

16    LOGMEIN, INC.

Our Board of Directors (continued)

Current Directors

LOGMEIN, INC.    17

Our Board of Directors (continued)

18    LOGMEIN, INC.

Corporate Governance

Our Commitment to Corporate Governance

The principal responsibility of our Board of Directors is to oversee the management of the Company and, in so doing, serve the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. To help fulfill this responsibility, our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. We believe that these corporate governance policies and guidelines adopted by our Board of Directors reflect many current “best practices,” including:

Complete copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the charters for our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are available on the “Investors — Corporate Governance — Documents & Charters” section of our website, www.logmeininc.com. Alternatively, you may request a copy of any of these documents free of charge by writing to:

LogMeIn, Inc.

320 Summer Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02210

Attention: Investor Relations

Any amendments to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be disclosed on our website.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board has implemented a leadership structure comprised of both a Chairman, Mr. Michael Simon, and a Lead Independent Director, Mr. Edwin Gillis:

Director Independence

NASDAQ and Exchange Act Independence Standards

Rule 5605(b)(1) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules (the “NASDAQ Rules”), independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s Board of Directors within one year of listing. The NASDAQ Rules also require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees be independent. Audit Committee members must also

LOGMEIN, INC.    19

Corporate Governance (continued)

satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 (“Rule 10A-3”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Under the NASDAQ Rules, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s Board of Directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an Audit Committee of a listed company may not, other than in his capacity as a member of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors, or any other Board Committee: (1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

Prior to accepting the appointments of Messrs. Calderoni, Cohn, Henshall and Sacripanti to our Board of Directors, our then-current Board of Directors was presented with a summary and analysis of Messrs. Calderoni, Cohn, Henshall and Sacripanti’s independence and qualifications for service under the aforementioned rules and regulations. Our Board of Directors has determined that, with the exception of Mr. Simon and Mr. Wagner, all of our directors, including each of Messrs. Calderoni, Cohn, Henshall and Sacripanti, qualify as “independent” as that term is defined under NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2) and the SEC regulations and that those directors who comprise our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees also satisfy the heightened independence standards for those committees established by applicable SEC regulations and the NASDAQ Rules. In making this determination, our Board of Directors considered the relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our Board of Directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.

Additional Independence Standards

In addition to the independence standards required by the NASDAQ Rules and the Exchange Act, certain organizations that serve institutional investors have additional heightened standards and policies which they use to evaluate director independence when making voting recommendations to shareholders. These standards and policies are often driven by a belief that directors who are too closely tied to management may have inherent conflicts of interest and therefore may be less willing and able to effectively evaluate and scrutinize company performance.

With the exception of Mr. Simon, who previously served as our CEO, and Mr. Wagner, who currently serves as our President and CEO, we believe that our other eight directors are sufficiently independent from our management team to allow them to effectively serve as directors since, in addition to their independence under the NASDAQ and Exchange Act standards, none of them have ever served as an officer or employee of LogMeIn or one of its affiliates, nor have they ever beneficially owned more than 50% of LogMeIn’s voting power.

Specifically with regard to Mr. Calderoni and Mr. Henshall, each of whom currently hold management positions at Citrix, it is important to note that: (i) while each is an officer of Citrix, Citrix itself never owned any shares of LogMeIn, and thus was not an affiliate of LogMeIn; (ii) Citrix was not a parent or predecessor to LogMeIn; and (iii) LogMeIn never had a joint venture or partnership arrangement, before, during or after the Merger with Citrix.

Board Meetings and Attendance

Our Board met eight (8) times during the year ended December 31, 2017. During 2017, each director attended at least 75% of the Board meetings held during the period for which he or she has been a director. During 2017, each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he or she then served. All of our directors were present at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in June 2017.

Board Committees

During fiscal 2017, our Board of Directors had four standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and an Operating Committee. Each committee operates under a charter that has been approved by our Board of Directors in compliance with the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, copies of which are available under the “Investor — Corporate Governance-Documents & Charters” section on our website, located at www.logmeininc.com. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, our Board of Directors appointed at least one Citrix director designee to each of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. In 2017, our Board had established an Operating Committee that was comprised of two Citrix designees and two directors serving on the Board prior to the Merger and which was responsible for designing and overseeing a plan to achieve the synergies expected to result from the Merger. The Operating Committee has since been disbanded by unanimous decision of the Board.

20    LOGMEIN, INC.

Corporate Governance (continued)

The following table indicates the members of each Board Committee from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017:

« = Chairman of the Board   ◆ = Lead Independent Director    = Committee Chair   = Committee member

Audit Committee — At the beginning of fiscal 2017, our Audit Committee was comprised of Mr. Gillis, who serves as chairman, Mr. Benson and Ms. Marilyn Matz, who resigned from the Board and all Committees effective January 31, 2017. Effective January 31, 2017, Ms. Matz and Mr. Benson were replaced on the Audit Committee by Mr. Henshall and Mr. Sacripanti. Our Board of Directors has determined that each Audit Committee member satisfies the requirements for financial literacy under the current requirements of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. Mr. Gillis is an “Audit Committee financial expert,” as defined by SEC rules, and satisfies the financial sophistication requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Our Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors in its oversight of our accounting and financial reporting process and the audits of our financial statements. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include:

All audit and non-audit services, other than de minimis non-audit services, to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm must be approved in advance by our Audit Committee.

Compensation Committee — At the beginning of fiscal 2017, our Compensation Committee was comprised of Mr. Benson, who served as chairman of the Committee and Mr. Gregory Hughes, who resigned from the Board and all Committees effective January 31, 2017. Effective January 31, 2017, our Compensation Committee was comprised of Mr. Henshall, who serves as chairman of the Committee, and Messrs. Benson, Calderoni and Christenson. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include:

LOGMEIN, INC.    21

Corporate Governance (continued)

None of our executive officers serve as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee, or other Committee serving an equivalent function, of any entity that has one or more executive officers who serve as members of our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee. None of the members of our Compensation Committee is an officer or employee of our company, nor have they ever been an officer or employee of our company.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee — At the beginning of fiscal 2017, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was comprised of Mr. Christenson and Mr. Gillis. Effective as of January 31, 2017, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was comprised of Mr. Benson, who serves as chairman of the Committee, and Messrs. Christenson and Sacripanti. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include:

Operating Committee — Our Operating Committee was established on January 31, 2017 effective upon the closing of our Merger. The Operating Committee was comprised of Mr. Calderoni, who served as chairman of the Committee, Mr. Christenson, Mr. Cohn and Mr. Simon. Pursuant to its charter, the Operating Committee was responsible for designing and overseeing a plan to achieve the synergies expected to result from the Company’s Merger, and to undertake any other related activities as may be delegated by the Board of Directors. The Committee was expected to serve for a period of two (2) years following January 31, 2017, at which time the Operating Committee would automatically disband and cease to exist as a Committee unless the Board of Directors acted to extend its existence. Given the Company’s success in achieving the synergies expected to result from the Merger ahead of its anticipated two-year schedule, the Board of Directors voted by unanimous decision to disband the Operating Committee effective September 6, 2017.

Director Nomination Process

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become members of our Board of Directors and for recommending to our Board of Directors the persons to be nominated for election as directors and to each Board Committee.

The process followed by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to identify and evaluate director candidates typically includes:

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers candidates proposed by our stockholders. Stockholders nominating director candidates must follow the procedures set forth under “INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING — “May I recommend a candidate for LogMeIn’s Board of Directors?”” and “How and when may I submit a stockholder proposal for the 2019 Annual Meeting?”

Candidate Criteria and Skills

Before recommending any particular candidate for inclusion in the Board of Directors’ slate of recommended director nominees, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that each candidate must satisfy at least the following minimum criteria:

22    LOGMEIN, INC.

Corporate Governance (continued)

In addition to the above minimum criteria, our Board of Directors also believes that having directors who provide a significant breadth of experience, knowledge and abilities in areas relevant to LogMeIn’s business, while also representing a diversity of gender, race, age, sexual orientation and ethnicity, contributes to a well-balanced and effective Board. Therefore, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is committed to ensuring that at least one candidate representing a diversity of gender, race, ethnicity, age and/or sexual orientation is included in each pool of new candidates from which Board nominees are chosen, and that directors should be selected so that the Board is a diverse body. Any search firm retained by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to find director candidates will be instructed to take into account all of the criteria used by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, including diversity. Director nominees are not discriminated against on the basis of gender, race, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability or any other basis proscribed by law.

In the spirit of this commitment to diversity one of three candidates nominated for election at LogMeIn’s 2018 Annual Meeting are women and going forward the Board remains committed to ensuring that the Board remains a diverse body, reflecting a variety of different perspectives, backgrounds and experiences.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the re-nomination of existing directors should not be viewed as automatic, but should be based on continuing qualification under the criteria set forth above and confirmation that each nominee possesses the appropriate skills and characteristics required of LogMeIn’s directors. The table below summarizes key qualifications, skills and attributes most relevant to the decision to nominate candidates to serve on our Board of Directors. A check mark indicates a specific area of focus or experience on which the Board relies most. The lack of a mark does not necessarily mean that the director does not possess that qualification or skill:

You can find more detailed information on our process for selecting Board members and our criteria for Board nominees in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on the “Investors — Corporate Governance — Documents & Charters” section of our website, www.logmeininc.com.

Director Voting Standard

Our by-laws provide that, in an uncontested election, each director will be elected by a majority of votes cast. A “majority of votes cast” means the number of shares voted “for” a director exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that director. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a director resignation policy that provides that, in uncontested elections, an incumbent director nominee who does not receive the required votes for re-election is expected to tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or another duly authorized Committee of the Board, will determine whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation generally within ninety days after certification of the election results. No director who failed to receive the required votes for re-election may participate in the consideration of the matter. The Company will publicly disclose the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s (or other responsible Committee’s) decision.

LOGMEIN, INC.    23

Corporate Governance (continued)

The majority voting standard does not apply, however, if the Board of Directors determines that the number of nominees for director exceeds the number of directors to be elected. In such circumstances, even if the number of nominees for director later no longer exceeds the number of directors to be elected, directors will instead be elected by a plurality of the votes cast, meaning that the nominees receiving the most votes will be elected.

Compensation Risk Assessment

Consistent with the SEC’s disclosure requirements, we have assessed our compensation programs for all employees. We have concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. Management has evaluated our executive and employee compensation and benefits programs to determine if these programs’ provisions and operations create undesired or unintentional risk of a material nature. The risk assessment process includes a review of program policies and practices; analysis to identify risks and risk controls related to our compensation programs; and determinations as to the sufficiency of risk identification, the balance of potential risk to potential reward, the effectiveness of our risk controls and the impacts of our compensation programs and their risks to LogMeIn strategy. Although we periodically review all compensation programs, we focus on the programs with variability of payout, with the ability of a participant to directly affect payout and the controls on participant action and payout. In relation to this, we believe that our incentive compensation arrangements provide incentives that do not encourage risk taking beyond our ability to effectively identify and manage significant risks and are compatible with effective internal controls and the risk management practices of LogMeIn.

The Compensation Committee monitors our compensation programs on an annual basis and expects to make modifications as necessary to address any changes in the Company’s business or risk profile.

The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain compensation consultants and other outside advisors to assist in the evaluation of executive officer compensation. Additionally, the Compensation Committee may delegate authority to one or more sub-committees as it deems appropriate. The processes and procedures followed by our Compensation Committee in considering and determining executive compensation are described below under the heading “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Transactions with Related Persons

Since January 1, 2017, we have not engaged in any transactions with our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of our voting securities, and affiliates or immediately family members of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our voting securities, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000.

Our Board of Directors has adopted written policies and procedures for the review of any transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we are a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and one of our executive officers, directors, director nominees or 5% stockholders (or their immediate family members), each of whom we refer to as a “related person,” has a direct or indirect material interest.

If a related person proposes to enter into such a transaction, arrangement or relationship, which we refer to as a “related person transaction,” the related person must report the proposed related person transaction to our general counsel. The policy calls for the proposed related person transaction to be reviewed and, if deemed appropriate, approved by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Whenever practicable, the reporting, review and approval will occur prior to entry into the transaction. If advance review and approval is not practicable, the Audit Committee will review, and, in its discretion, may ratify the related person transaction. The policy also permits the chairman of the Audit Committee to review and, if deemed appropriate, approve proposed related person transactions that arise between Audit Committee meetings, subject to ratification by the Audit Committee at its next meeting. Any related person transactions that are ongoing in nature will be reviewed annually.

A related person transaction reviewed under the policy will be considered approved or ratified if it is authorized by the Audit Committee after full disclosure of the related person’s interest in the transaction. As appropriate for the circumstances, the Audit Committee will review and consider:

24    LOGMEIN, INC.

Corporate Governance (continued)

The Audit Committee may approve or ratify the transaction only if it determines that, under all of the circumstances, the transaction is consistent with our best interests. The Audit Committee may impose any conditions on the related-person transaction that it deems appropriate.

In addition to the transactions that are excluded by the instructions to the SEC’s related-person transaction disclosure rule, our Board of Directors has determined that the following transactions do not create a material direct or indirect interest on behalf of related persons and, therefore, are not related-person transactions for purposes of this policy:

The policy provides that transactions involving compensation of executive officers shall be reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee in the manner specified in its charter.

Communicating with our Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors will give appropriate attention to written communications that are submitted by stockholders, and will respond if and as appropriate. The chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, subject to the advice and assistance of our General Counsel, is primarily responsible for monitoring communications from stockholders and for providing copies or summaries to the other directors as he considers appropriate.

Communications are forwarded to all directors if they relate to important substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers to be important for the directors to review. In general, communications relating to corporate governance and corporate strategy are more likely to be forwarded than communications relating to ordinary business affairs, personal grievances and matters as to which we receive repetitive or duplicative communications.

Stockholders who wish to send communications to our Board of Directors on any topic should address such communications to:

LogMeIn, Inc.

320 Summer Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02210

Attention: Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary

LOGMEIN, INC.    25

Director Compensation

Overview of 2017 Director Compensation Program

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing our director compensation program and for making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the appropriateness of our director compensation levels. We use a combination of cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors. Our Compensation Committee has retained an independent compensation consultant, Compensia, Inc., or Compensia, who reports directly to the Compensation Committee and uses competitive market data to provide the Committee with compensation ranges that are consistent with the compensation offered by other companies within our peer group.

In early 2017, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia to help benchmark our non-employee director compensation program against the compensation programs offered by the other companies in our post-Merger peer group, which had been reset to reflect LogMeIn’s scale, profile, revenue and competitive environment following the completion of its merger with the GoTo Business. After carefully considering the competitive market data prepared by Compensia, our Board approved an increase in both the cash and stock-based compensation to be paid to members of our Board of Directors for fiscal 2017.

Mr. Simon, our Chairman and former Special Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Wagner, our President and Chief Executive Officer, did not receive any compensation in connection with their service as directors during fiscal 2017. The compensation that we paid in 2017 to Mr. Wagner as an employee is discussed in the “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 33.

2017 Director Cash Compensation

For fiscal 2017, each of our non-employee directors were entitled to receive the annual cash retainer fees set forth in the tables below, which were paid in quarterly installments. We also reimburse each non-employee director for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their attending meetings of our Board of Directors.

The tables below summarize our 2017 non-employee director cash compensation program:

2017 Director Stock Compensation

In addition to cash compensation, we also grant our non-employee directors RSU awards under our Amended and Restated 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. In determining the amounts of RSU awards to be granted to our non-employee directors, the Compensation Committee generally plans to grant awards that are deemed to be competitive with the equity awards granted by the other companies within our fiscal 2017 compensation peer group and other companies within our industry and region.

Each of our non-employee directors who served during fiscal 2017 were awarded a time-based RSU award with vesting conditions which were subject to their continued service as a director through their applicable vesting date. Pursuant to the individual award agreements, vesting rights typically cease after termination of service except in the case of death or disability. Prior to the vesting of an RSU, the holder has no rights as a stockholder with respect to the shares subject to such RSU, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents.

26    LOGMEIN, INC.

Director Compensation (continued)

In fiscal 2017, the following time-based RSU awards were granted to our non-employee directors:

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our Board of Directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors. Pursuant to these stock ownership guidelines, each current non-employee director and any newly appointed non-employee director is required to, by the date three (3) years from the date the guidelines became applicable to such non-employee director, own shares of the company’s common stock having an aggregate value at least equal to one times the amount of the annual cash retainer that we currently pay our non-employee directors for general service on our Board, excluding any additional retainers paid for serving on committees or as Lead Independent Director. For purposes of this calculation, shares of the company’s common stock held directly or indirectly by the non-employee director are included while any outstanding and unvested RSU awards or any outstanding and unvested or vested but unexercised stock option awards are excluded.

Director Compensation in Fiscal 2017

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by our non-employee directors during 2017:

LOGMEIN, INC.    27

Director Compensation (continued)

28    LOGMEIN, INC.

LOGMEIN, INC.    29

Proposal 2 — Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (continued)

Auditor Fees and Services

The following table presents the aggregate fees of Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, incurred by us for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017:

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors believes that the non-audit services described above did not compromise Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence. The Audit Committee’s charter, a copy of which can be found on the “Investors — Corporate Governance — Documents & Charters” section of our website, www.logmeininc.com, requires that all proposals to engage Deloitte & Touche LLP for services, and all proposed fees for these services, be submitted to the Audit Committee for approval before Deloitte & Touche LLP may provide the services. From time to time, our Audit Committee may pre-approve specified types of services that are expected to be provided to us by our registered public accounting firm during the next twelve months. Any pre-approval is also generally subject to a maximum dollar amount, and the Audit Committee is informed of each service once it has been provided.

30    LOGMEIN, INC.

LOGMEIN, INC.    31

Our Executive Officers

Our executive officers and their respective ages and positions as of our record date, April 2, 2018, are as follows:

Executive Officer Biographies

32    LOGMEIN, INC.

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices, and also details the 2017 compensation paid to those individuals who served as our principal executive officer and principal financial officer during the year ended December 31, 2017, as well as the three executive officers (other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) who were our most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2017. These individuals were as follows:

The above executive officers represent our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. In this Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis, LogMeIn may also be referred to as “our,” “us,” “we,” or the “Company.”

Executive Summary

Use of non-GAAP Financial Measures

Our Compensation Discussion & Analysis contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. To supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a GAAP basis, the Company discloses certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures.

Significant 2017 Business Highlights

2017 was a successful and transformative year for LogMeIn. We consistently delivered strong financial results in the face of major change, exceeding our guidance in each of the four quarters while building the foundation for a large SaaS company capable of leveraging our talented employees, our strong product brands and our history of innovation to establish a strong foothold in much larger markets.

Our Executive Compensation Philosophy

We believe in the importance of aligning the financial interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Therefore, a majority of our named executive officer compensation is designed to be variable and tied to our achievement of key financial and strategic performance objectives, the performance of our stock price, or both, which helps us incentivize our executive officers to create value for our stockholders.

LOGMEIN, INC.    33

GoTo Merger Closed January 31, 2017 Creating a Company with: 2.3M subscribers 24M Free Users 2,760 Employees Two-Year Synergy Plan Completed in 11 Months $121M2 Capital Returned to Stockholders Non-GAAP1 $1.024B 2017 Revenue 6% Pro-Forma Growth $373M Adjusted EBITDA 36% Margin $316M Free Cash Flow 31% Margin GAAP $990M 2017 Revenue $210M EBITDA $250M Free Cash Flow

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Our executive compensation program has been designed to attract, retain and motivate talented executives. Accordingly, when setting individual executive compensation levels, the Compensation Committee generally targets executive compensation at levels that are competitive with other public and private companies in our industry and region with whom we compete for talent. Actual target pay positioning may vary by individual depending on the experience level and performance of the executive and other factors, such as the demand for executives with certain skills and experience and the costs associated with recruiting qualified executives from other established companies.

What We Do vs. What We Don’t Do

We believe in maintaining sound executive compensation policies and practices, including compensation-related corporate governance standards, consistent with our executive compensation philosophy. Below we summarize those executive compensation policies and practices we have implemented to help drive executive performance, as well as practices we have chosen not to implement because we believe such practices do not support our stockholders’ long-term interests:

34    LOGMEIN, INC.

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

How We Set our 2017 Executive Compensation Program

Impact of GoTo Merger on our 2017 Executive Compensation Program

On January 31, 2017, we successfully completed our acquisition of the GoTo family of service offerings, or the GoTo Business, from a wholly–owned subsidiary of Citrix Systems, Inc. via a Reverse Morris Trust transaction, which we refer to herein as the “Merger.” The completion of the Merger marked a historic milestone for LogMeIn and quickly transformed the Company into one of the largest pure SaaS companies in the world with annual revenues in excess of $1 billion and more than two million customers spanning virtually every country around the globe. This dramatic change created a completely new profile for LogMeIn – a company with the scale, employees, products and customer base needed to lead large technology markets, deliver enduring revenue growth and expand margins, while returning meaningful capital to our stockholders.

Shortly following the closing of the Merger, our Compensation Committee worked with its independent compensation consultant, Compensia, Inc., to revise the composition of LogMeIn’s existing compensation peer group to reflect LogMeIn’s post-Merger scale, financial profile and competitive environment (see section below entitled “Use of Competitive Market Data”). Once this new post-Merger peer group was established, the Compensation Committee instructed Compensia to provide them with the competitive market data needed to help the Compensation Committee establish executive compensation ranges consistent with the other companies within the post-Merger peer group.

While the completion of the Merger did not change any of our previous executive compensation philosophies, our Compensation Committee did believe that it was important to realign our 2017 executive compensation levels with those of the other companies in our post-Merger peer group, with whom LogMeIn would now be competing with for executive talent. In some cases, this peer group reset resulted in increases to certain elements of our 2017 executive compensation program which were greater than our historical year-over-year increases. However, rather than automatically bring LogMeIn’s executive compensation levels in-line with the total direct compensation opportunity ranges of the other companies within the post-Merger peer group on Day 1, the Compensation Committee elected to evolve LogMeIn’s pre-Merger executive total direct compensation opportunity levels over time to appropriate post-Merger levels by granting our executives a special one-time Merger-related equity award comprised of 50% time-based RSUs with a two-year cliff vesting condition and 50% PRSUs with a performance-based vesting condition tied to the Company’s achievement of a two-year Adjusted EBITDA Margin performance measure, which represented the financial operating measure that most closely resembled the Company’s post-Merger two-year $100 million run rate cost synergy goal, thereby aligning a substantial portion of our named executive officer’s compensation with the creation of value for our stockholders (see section below entitled “Merger-Related February 2017 Executive Equity Awards”).

When considered as a whole, we believe that the increases to our 2017 executive compensation program remained consistent with our historical compensation philosophies and practices and were designed to bring the compensation ranges of our executive officers closer to the compensation ranges of the comparable executive officers at the other companies within our post-Merger peer group.

Results of Last Year’s “Say-on-Pay” Vote

At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 96.7% of the votes cast by stockholders on the compensation of our named executive officers, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote, were cast in support of the 2016 compensation of our named executive officers. While the “say-on-pay” vote is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors pay close attention to the results and given the strong level of support evidenced by last year’s say-on-pay vote, the Compensation Committee determined that our stockholders were generally supportive of our current executive compensation philosophy and program and decided that no significant changes were necessary for our 2017 executive compensation program.

Nevertheless, the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors continue to regularly monitor the executive compensation program to ensure it continues to align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders.

Role of Stockholder Engagement

We believe in the importance of regularly engaging with our stockholders. In recent years we have proactively reached out to many of our largest stockholders to solicit their feedback on the elements of our executive compensation program, our disclosure practices and our corporate governance in order to gain a better understanding of the practices they most value. Typically, our stockholder engagement team has consisted of one or more members of our investor relations, finance or legal teams. Stockholders also regularly meet with members of our senior management team to discuss our strategy and/or review our operational performance.

In recent years, stockholder feedback has influenced certain changes made to our executive compensation program, including the introduction of performance-based RSU awards for our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the implementation of an executive compensation recovery, or “clawback,” policy, and the establishment of stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers and non-employee directors.

LOGMEIN, INC.    35

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Stockholders who wish to communicate with our stockholder engagement team may do so by contacting our Investor Relations Department at the address below:

LogMeIn, Inc.

320 Summer Street

Boston Massachusetts 02210

Attention: Investor Relations

InvestorRelations@logmein.com

781-897-0694

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors oversees our executive compensation program and approves all executive compensation decisions. Near the beginning of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee meets to review the executive compensation program, set the Company’s compensation peer group, establish the company-wide performance measures used to determine each executive officer’s annual cash bonus opportunities for the fiscal year and review the total compensation for our executive officers to ensure consistency with our overall compensation philosophy.

Role of Our Chief Executive Officer

We believe that our Chief Executive Officer is uniquely positioned to help our Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee in many of its compensation decisions as he possesses detailed knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing us, our business and our industry, which help him to identify the key performance measures and indicators that may be used in setting incentive-based compensation. Our Chief Executive Officer is also close enough to our day-to-day operations to be able to identify key contributors and top performers within the Company and help ensure that their compensation accurately reflects their responsibilities, performance, future expectations and experience levels. For these reasons, the feedback and recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer is often taken into consideration by our Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee when setting compensation levels.

Role of the Compensation Consultant and Other Advisors

The Compensation Committee has retained Compensia, a nationally-recognized compensation consulting firm, to serve as its independent compensation consultant. In this role, Compensia reports directly to the Compensation Committee and, as requested by the Committee, attends certain Compensation Committee meetings, executive sessions and preparatory meetings with the Committee chair. Compensia uses the competitive market data described below to provide the Committee with compensation ranges that are consistent with our compensation peer group for the Compensation Committee to consider and also reviews the Compensation Committee’s proposed compensation decisions. Compensia did not provide any other services for LogMeIn in 2017.

In compliance with the disclosure requirements of the SEC and the listing standards of NASDAQ regarding the independence of compensation consultants, the Compensation Committee has assessed each of the six independence factors established by the SEC and the NASDAQ and has determined that the engagement of Compensia does not raise any conflicts of interest or similar concerns. In addition, the Compensation Committee evaluated the independence of its other outside advisors to the Compensation Committee, including outside legal counsel, considering the same independence factors and concluded their work for the Compensation Committee also does not raise any conflicts of interest.

Use of Competitive Market Data

Our Compensation Committee works with Compensia to regularly review competitive market data and analysis based on a select group of peer companies, including information about current market practices and trends, compensation structures and peer group compensation ranges. The comparative market data Compensia provides is based on a compensation peer group approved by the Compensation Committee with input from Compensia. Typically, this compensation peer group is comprised of software-as-a-services (“SaaS”) companies that are considered comparable to LogMeIn based on financial criteria, such as revenue, market capitalization and growth history and potential.

36    LOGMEIN, INC.

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

For fiscal 2017, LogMeIn reset its compensation peer group to reflect LogMeIn’s anticipated post-Merger scale, financial profile and competitive environment. For example, immediately following the Merger, LogMeIn’s annual revenues were expected to grow from $336 million in fiscal 2016 to over $1 billion in fiscal 2017. As a result, the fiscal 2017 compensation peer group consisted of the following companies (the “2017 Peer Group”):

Our positioning with respect to the 2017 Peer Group expressed in terms of the last four quarters of their disclosed revenue and market capitalization as of August 1, 2016, which represents the first full month following the July 2016 announcement of our Merger, is reflected in the following tables:

LOGMEIN, INC.    37

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

The table below and the Executive Compensation Program Narrative that follows identify and describe the individual elements of our executive compensation program:

38    LOGMEIN, INC.

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Total Direct Compensation and Our Pay-for-Performance Alignment

The Compensation Committee bases its executive compensation decisions on each named executive officer’s total direct compensation opportunity. The total direct compensation opportunities of our named executive officers are generally comprised of a mix of cash compensation, in the form of base salaries and annual cash incentive bonuses, and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards. This total direct compensation mix has been designed so that the elements of variable pay, such as our annual cash incentive bonus awards and equity awards, represent a substantial portion of the total direct compensation opportunity awarded to our named executive officers.

Much like in recent years, at least 50% of Messrs. Wagner and Herdiech’s 2017 total direct compensation opportunity was designed to be “at risk,” by tying at least half of their 2017 compensation opportunity to variable pay elements such as long-term equity incentive awards with performance-based vesting conditions, or PRSU awards, (as further described in the section below entitled “Equity Incentive Awards — Fiscal 2017 Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards”) and our cash incentive bonus plan, which provides for a variable cash payment based on the Company’s achievement of certain pre-established financial goals. However, unlike prior years, all of our named executive officers (in addition to our CEO and CFO) received long-term equity incentive awards with performance-based vesting conditions in 2017.

By dedicating a large percentage of our executives’ total direct compensation opportunity to these variable “at risk” pay elements rather than fixed pay elements like base salary, the Compensation Committee believes that we are able to better link executive incentives with the Company’s performance. The maximum possible value of the 2017 PRSU awards granted to Messrs. Wagner and Herdiech, when calculated based on the grant date fair value (i.e., the market value per share of our common stock as represented by the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant) of the maximum number of shares that may be earned under their 2017 PRSU awards, represented 46% and 45%, respectively, of their total direct compensation opportunity, while 6% and 5%, respectively, of their 2017 total direct compensation opportunity was subject to our cash incentive bonus plan.

In keeping with the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy, the fiscal 2017 equity awards granted to Messrs. Wagner and Herdiech were each comprised of 50% time-based RSUs and 50% PRSUs. The Compensation Committee believes that including PRSU awards in the total direct compensation opportunities of those executives whose individual performances and decisions have a direct impact on our Company’s performance helps to strengthen our overall pay-for-performance alignment by ensuring that a substantial portion of their compensation is aligned with the creation of value for our stockholders.

The following charts illustrate the breakdown of the total direct compensation pay mix awarded to Mr. Wagner and Mr. Herdiech in fiscal 2017:

LOGMEIN, INC.    39

CEO Target Compensation Mix CFO Target Compensation Mix Restricted Stock Units 42% Salary 6% Target Bonus 6% Performance Stock Units 46% Restricted Stock Units 41% Salary 9% Target Bonus 5% Performance Stock Units 45% 52% Performance-Based Pay 50% Performance-Based Pay

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Executive Compensation Program Narrative

Base Salaries

Overview

To ensure that we continue to attract, retain and motivate our executive officers, we believe that we must offer base salaries that are competitive with those base salaries offered by other similarly situated companies in our industry and region. We believe that our base salaries are representative of the overall experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities required of all our employees, including our named executive officers. None of our executives are currently party to any employment agreement that provides for automatic or scheduled increases in their base salary.

Base salaries are reviewed by our Compensation Committee annually and are adjusted from time-to-time where deemed appropriate.

Fiscal 2017 Base Salaries

In establishing the base salaries for our named executive officers for fiscal 2017, our Compensation Committee considered the following factors:

The following table sets forth the fiscal 2017 base salaries and the percentage increase over their fiscal 2016 base salaries for each of our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2017:

In deciding to increase Mr. Wagner’s base salary by approximately 28.9% over his fiscal 2016 base salary, our Compensation Committee considered the base salaries of the comparable Chief Executive Officers at the other companies within our 2017 Peer Group, the dramatically increased scale and scope of Mr. Wagner’s responsibilities following the completion of the Merger as well as the key role that Mr. Wagner was expected to play in the Company achieving its financial, strategic and operational goals for fiscal 2017 and beyond.

After evaluating the competitive market data provided by Compensia and the base salaries of the comparable Chief Financial Officers at the other companies within our 2017 Peer Group, the Compensation Committee decided to increase Mr. Herdiech’s fiscal 2017 base salary by approximately 20.5% over his fiscal 2016 base salary. In addition to considering the expanded scope and scale of Mr. Herdiech’s responsibilities following the completion of the Merger, our Compensation Committee also believed this increase was representative of Mr. Herdiech’s overall performance in fiscal 2016 and represented a base salary that was more competitive with the base salaries of similarly situated Chief Financial Officers at the other companies within our 2017 Peer Group.

In deciding to increase the 2017 base salary of Mr. D’Angelo by approximately 16.1%, our Compensation Committee considered the base salaries of similarly situated executives at the other companies within our 2017 Peer Group and also considered Mr. D’Angelo’s role in helping the Company to achieve its fiscal 2016 sales goals despite the potential for distractions due to the Company’s focus on closing the Merger. The Compensation Committee believed that the 16.1% increase over Mr. D’Angelo’s fiscal 2016 base salary accurately reflected his strong job performance in fiscal 2016, his continued importance to the Company’s sales and overall business goals and also represented a base salary that was more competitive with the base salaries of similarly situated sales executives at the other companies within our 2017 Peer Group.

Messrs. Battles and Lok joined the Company effective January 31, 2017 as a result of the Merger.

40    LOGMEIN, INC.

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Annual Cash Incentive Bonuses

Overview

All of our named executive officers (except for Mr. D’Angelo who is on a sales commission plan as described further below) are eligible to earn an annual cash bonus under our performance-based annual Cash Incentive Bonus Plan. Our annual cash bonuses are intended to reward our executives for the achievement of our financial and operational performance goals and objectives for the applicable fiscal year. The target annual cash bonus opportunity (assuming achievement of 100% of our goals) for each named executive officer is set by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year and expressed as a percentage of the applicable executive officer’s base salary, with potential cash bonus opportunity generally commensurate with each executive’s role and responsibilities. Pursuant to the terms of our Cash Incentive Bonus Plan, the maximum aggregate amount that may be paid to any one bonus plan participant during any fiscal year is $3 million.

2017 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Plan

For 2017, our named executive officers were eligible to earn an annual cash incentive bonus equal to the following percentages of their 2017 base salary:

At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines which key performance measures should be used to set the Company’s annual cash incentive bonus targets for the year. For fiscal 2017, the Company’s annual cash incentive bonus plan was tied to two key performance measures:

For fiscal 2017, both performance measures and the target performance levels set by the Compensation Committee were prepared on a pro-forma basis including the results of the GoTo Business beginning January 1, 2017. Please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures.

Our Compensation Committee believes that basing the annual cash incentive bonus plan on recognized indicators of overall company performance helps to align our executive incentives with the interests of our stockholders as our Company’s achievement of the target performance levels set by the Compensation Committee for these measures should also translate into stockholder value. When setting the target performance levels for each performance measure, the Compensation Committee considers factors such as our historical performance, growth rates and current market conditions and designs each target performance level to require sufficient effort and operational success on the part of our executive officers and the Company as a whole. For fiscal 2017, the target performance levels for the non-GAAP revenue and non-GAAP operating income measures were each weighted equally as being worth 50% of the potential 2017 cash incentive bonus opportunity for each named executive officer. For the purposes of calculating the 2017 annual cash incentive bonuses:

LOGMEIN, INC.    41

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Typically, annual cash incentive bonuses are paid after the completion of the applicable fiscal year, based on the Company’s actual results versus the Compensation Committee’s established target performance levels. In the event that the Company’s actual results exceed or fall short of the target performance levels, cash incentive bonus amounts are increased or decreased accordingly. Our actual 2017 results versus the Compensation Committee’s pre-established target performance levels for non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP revenues were as follows:

The Company achieved 100% of the 2017 non-GAAP operating income target performance level set by the Compensation Committee, which meant that the portion of each named executive officer’s potential 2017 cash incentive bonus opportunity that was tied to the non-GAAP operating income performance measure was earned in full, while the Company also attained 99.5% of its non-GAAP revenue target performance level, which resulted in 94.6% achievement of the non-GAAP revenue performance measure set by the Compensation Committee. When the results of both performance measures were weighed together, the 2017 annual cash incentive bonuses for our named executive officers were awarded at approximately 97.3% of the established target performance levels and paid as follows: