This summary highlights selected information in the proxy statement. Please review the entire proxy

statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 before voting.

MSG Networks Inc., an industry leader in sports production, and content development and distribution, owns and operates two award-winning regional sports and entertainment networks, MSG Network and MSG+, and a live streaming and video on demand platform, MSG GO. For more than 40 years, we have been a pioneer in regional sports television, setting a standard of excellence, creativity and technological innovation. Today, our exclusive award-winning

programming continues to be a valuable differentiator for our viewers, advertisers and the cable, satellite, telephone and other platforms that distribute our networks. Our networks are widely distributed throughout our territory, which includes all of New York State and significant portions of New Jersey and Connecticut, as well as parts of Pennsylvania. Our networks are also carried nationally by certain distributors on sports tiers or in similar packages.

Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Governance Guidelines”) and practices to promote the functioning

of the Board and its committees to serve the best interests of all our stockholders. Several of our practices are highlighted below.

The Board has nominated 12 director candidates. Of the 12 nominees, three are Class A nominees and nine are Class B nominees. All director candidates have been nominated for a term to expire at the 2018 annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders and once their successors have been elected and qualified.

Our Class A nominees are elected by holders of Class A Common Stock:

Our Class B nominees are elected by holders of Class B Common Stock:

Our Board believes that the Company and its stockholders benefit from the combination of Class A and Class B Directors’ perspectives, institutional knowledge, and their collective deep business and investment experience.

Detailed information about each director’s background, skills and qualifications can be found under “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors.”

The Company is an industry leader in sports production and content development and distribution and competes for talent among a wide array of media and entertainment companies. Our named executive officers (“NEOs”) have substantial and meaningful professional experience in the industry in which the

Company operates. The Company places great importance on its ability to attract, retain, motivate and reward experienced NEOs who can continue to drive our business objectives and achieve strong financial, operational and stock price performance.

The Company compensates its NEOs through salary, annual incentive awards, long-term incentive awards, perquisites and benefit programs. Our annual and long-term incentive programs provide performance-based incentives for our NEOs tied to key financial and strategic measures that drive long-term

stockholder value and reward sustained achievement of the Company’s key financial goals. The Company considers Company revenue and adjusted operating income, or “AOI,” to be the key measures of the Company’s operating performance. As such, our Compensation Committee has incorporated these

performance measures into our incentive plans, along with other specific strategic and operating measures.

The table below summarizes the current elements of our compensation program and how each element

supports the Company’s compensation objectives. For more information on our executive compensation program and policies, please see “Compensation and Discussion and Analysis.”

MSG Networks Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a holding company and conducts substantially all of its operations through its subsidiaries. Our Class A Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “MSGN.” As a result, we are subject to certain of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

The Company was incorporated on July 29, 2009 as an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Cablevision Systems Corporation (“Cablevision”). On February 9, 2010, Cablevision spun off the Company (the “Cablevision Distribution”) and the Company acquired the subsidiaries of Cablevision that owned, directly and indirectly, all of the partnership interests in MSG Holdings, L.P.

MSG Networks was formerly known as “The Madison Square Garden Company.” We changed our name to MSG Networks Inc. on September 30, 2015 (the “MSG Distribution Date”) in connection with the distribution of all of the outstanding common stock of MSG Spinco, Inc. (now known as The Madison Square Garden Company and referred to herein as “MSG”) to our stockholders (the “MSG Distribution”). Pursuant to the MSG Distribution, MSG acquired the entertainment and sports businesses previously owned and operated by the Company through its MSG Entertainment and MSG Sports business segments, including the arenas and other venues previously owned, leased or operated by the Company as well as the Company’s interests in various joint ventures.

These proxy materials are provided in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 7, 2017, at The Paley Center for Media, which is located at 25 West 52^nd Street, New York, NY.

In this Proxy Statement, the words “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “MSG Networks” refer to MSG Networks Inc., a Delaware corporation. This Proxy Statement is being sent to stockholders on or about October 27, 2017. Unless otherwise indicated, references to “2017,” the “2017 fiscal year” and the “year ended June 30, 2017” refer to the Company’s fiscal year ended on June 30, 2017.

Holders of our Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class A Common Stock”) and holders of our Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class B Common Stock,” together with Class A Common Stock, collectively, “Company Stock”) as recorded in our stock register at the close of business on October 13, 2017, may vote at the meeting. On October 13, 2017, there were 61,648,035 shares of Class A Common Stock and 13,588,555 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding. Each share of Class A Common Stock has one vote per share and holders will be voting for

the election of three candidates to the Board. Each share of Class B Common Stock has ten votes per share and holders will be voting for the election of nine candidates to the Board. As a result of their ownership of all of the shares of our Class B Common Stock, members of the Charles F. Dolan family and certain related family entities, have the power to elect all of the directors to be elected by the holders of our Class B Common Stock, and to approve Proposals 2, 3 and 4 regardless of how other shares are voted.

Pursuant to rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company has elected to provide access to its proxy materials by Internet. Accordingly, the Company has sent a Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our stockholders. All stockholders have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials by Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in

the Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. In addition, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically. If you previously chose to receive proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive access to these materials via email unless you otherwise elect. The Company encourages stockholders who have not already done so to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the cost and the environmental impact of the annual meeting.

Stockholder of Record.    If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, you are considered a stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials was sent directly to you by the Company. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will also receive a proxy card.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name.    If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm,

bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, then you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials was forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct that organization how to vote the shares held in your account. If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a voting instruction form from that organization.

In order to carry on the business of the annual meeting, we need a majority of the votes represented by the outstanding shares eligible to vote on October 13, 2017 to be present, in person or by proxy. This is known as a “quorum.” If voting on a particular

action is by class, a majority of the votes represented by the outstanding shares of such class constitutes a quorum for such action. Abstentions and broker non-votes (described below) are considered present for purposes of determining a quorum.

You may vote in advance of the annual meeting by telephone, Internet or mail by following the instructions provided on the Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you choose to vote by mail, please sign, date and return the proxy card in the postage-paid envelope

provided. You may also vote in person or by legal proxy at the meeting. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, the Board strongly recommends that you submit a proxy to vote your shares in advance so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the annual meeting.

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, you must instruct them

how to vote your shares. Please use the voting instruction form provided to you by your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other

similar organization to direct them how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on the election of directors or any other proposal on which the brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” In these cases, the brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization can register your shares as being present at the annual meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under applicable rules.

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or

other similar organization, your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization has discretionary voting authority under applicable rules to vote your shares on the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as the Company’s independent auditors (Proposal 2), even if the brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization does not have discretionary authority to vote on the (i) election of directors (Proposal 1) or (ii) advisory votes with respect to named executive officer compensation (Proposals 3 and 4) without instructions from you, in which case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these matters.

Election of directors by the holders of our Class A Common Stock requires the affirmative vote of the plurality of votes cast by holders of our Class A Common Stock. Election of directors by the holders of our Class B Common Stock requires the affirmative vote of the plurality of votes cast by holders of our Class B Common Stock. Approval of Proposals 2, 3 and 4 require the favorable vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of our Class A Common Stock and the holders of our Class B Common Stock, voting together as a single

class. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the proposals because abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast. As a result of their ownership of all of the shares of our Class B Common Stock, members of the Charles F. Dolan family and certain related family entities have the power to elect all of the directors to be elected by the holders of our Class B Common Stock and to approve Proposals 2, 3 and 4 regardless of how other shares are voted. Proposals 3 and 4 are advisory votes only and are not binding on the Company.

Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the final vote at the annual meeting. You may change your vote prior to the annual meeting by:

If your shares are held in a brokerage account by a broker, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker in order to change your vote.

The proxy materials, including the proxy card, are being solicited on behalf of the Board. The Company representatives appointed by the Board (the persons named on the proxy card, or, if applicable, their substitutes) will vote your shares as you instruct. If you sign your proxy card and return it without indicating how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be voted as the Board recommends, which is:

The Company will bear the expense of preparing, printing and mailing this proxy statement and the accompanying materials. Solicitation of individual stockholders may be made by mail, personal interviews, telephone, facsimile, electronic delivery or other telecommunications by our executive officers and regular employees who will receive no additional compensation for such activities.

We have retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist with the solicitation of proxies for a fee estimated not to exceed $20,000, plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, we will reimburse brokers and other nominees for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to beneficial owners.

An admission ticket will be required if you plan to attend the annual meeting in person. To be admitted to the 2017 annual meeting, you must have been a stockholder at the close of business on the record date of October 13, 2017 or be the legal proxy holder or qualified representative of such stockholder. You must bring with you your admission ticket and a valid government-issued photo identification card (federal, state or local), such as a driver’s license or passport. Persons without an admission ticket and proper identification may be denied admission to the annual meeting. Registration will begin at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on the annual meeting date.

To obtain an admission ticket, go to www.proxyvote.com or call 1-844-318-0137 (toll-free) or 925-331-6070 (international). You will need to enter your 16-digit control number, which can be found on your Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, voting instruction form or proxy card. You may also request an admission ticket by calling the telephone number on your voting instruction form or proxy card. The deadline to obtain an admission ticket is 5:00 p.m. on November 30, 2017. If you have questions about

admission to the annual meeting, please call 1-844-318-0137 (toll-free) or 925-331-6070 (international).

Please note that you will need your admission ticket to be admitted to the meeting whether you vote before or at the meeting, and regardless of whether you are a registered or beneficial stockholder. If you are attending the meeting as a proxy or qualified representative for a stockholder, you will need to bring your legal proxy or authorization letter in addition to your admission ticket and government-issued photo identification card.

Stockholders must provide advance written notice to the Company if they intend to have a legal proxy (other than the persons appointed as proxies on the Company’s proxy card) or a qualified representative attend the annual meeting on their behalf. The notice must include the name and address of the legal proxy or qualified representative and must be received by 5:00 p.m. on November 30, 2017 in order to allow enough time for the issuance of an admission ticket to such person. For further details, see “Other — Advance Notice of Proxy Holders and Qualified Representatives.”

Please note that cameras, video and audio recording equipment and other similar electronic devices, as well as large bags (including backpacks, handbags and briefcases) and packages will need to be checked at the door. Additionally, the Company may impose

additional restrictions on items that must be checked at the door. To ensure the safety of all persons, attendees and bags may also be subject to security inspections.

Stockholders of record who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials may receive only one copy of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 (the “2017 Form 10-K”) unless we are notified that one or more of these stockholders wishes to receive individual copies. This “householding” procedure will reduce our printing costs and postage fees.

Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. If you are eligible for householding, but you and other stockholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents, or if you hold MSG Networks stock in more than one account, and, in either case, you wish to receive only a single copy of each of these documents for your household, please

contact Broadridge Householding Department, by calling their toll free number, 1-866-540-7095, or by writing to: Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

If you participate in householding and wish to receive a separate copy of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents, or if you do not wish to continue to participate in householding and prefer to receive separate copies of these documents in the future, please contact Broadridge Householding Department as indicated above. You will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of your instructions, at which time you will then be sent separate copies of the documents.

If you are a beneficial owner, you can request information about householding from your broker, bank or other holder of record.

This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, the proxy card and the Company’s 2017 Form 10-K, along with instructions on how to obtain an admission ticket to attend the annual meeting in person, are available at www.proxyvote.com.

In accordance with the SEC rules, we are using the Internet as our primary means of furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders. Consequently, most of our stockholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials. Instead we are sending these stockholders a Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials with instructions for accessing the proxy materials, including our proxy statement and 2017 Form 10-K, and voting by Internet. The Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet

Availability of Proxy Materials also provides information on how our stockholders may obtain paper copies of our proxy materials if they so choose. This makes the proxy distribution process more efficient and less costly, and helps conserve natural resources. If you previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, these materials will continue to be sent via email unless you change your election.

If you receive paper copies of our proxy materials and would like to sign up for electronic delivery via email or the Internet, please follow the instructions to vote by Internet at www.proxyvote.com and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in future years.

The following section provides an overview of our Board and corporate governance practices.

Since the spin-off of our entertainment and sports businesses into a separate publicly traded company (The Madison Square Garden Company) in

September 2015, we have taken several actions to be responsive to stockholder feedback, including expanding our stockholder outreach efforts and enhancing our proxy disclosure to provide greater transparency to our stockholders.

Our Board has adopted the Governance Guidelines and other practices to promote the functioning of the Board and its committees to serve the best interests of all our stockholders. The Governance Guidelines provide a framework for our governance practices, including:

Our Governance Guidelines set forth our practices and policies with respect to Board composition and selection, Board meetings, executive sessions of the Board, Board committees, the expectations we have of our directors, selection of the Executive Chairman and the President and Chief Executive Officer, management succession, Board and executive compensation, and Board self-assessment requirements. The full text of our Governance Guidelines may be viewed at our corporate website at www.msgnetworks.com under Investors — Corporate Governance. A copy may be obtained by writing to MSG Networks Inc., 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001; Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Fostering long-term relationships with our stockholders is a priority for the Company. Engagement helps us gain insight into the issues most important to our stockholders, informing Board discussions and allowing us to consider investors’ views on a range of topics including corporate governance and executive compensation matters.

During the 2017 fiscal year, we engaged with holders of approximately 75% of our Class A Common Stock concerning our Board, governance and executive compensation practices, with the specific goal of seeking stockholder feedback. We greatly value the views of our stockholders, and look forward to continuing this dialogue.

Our Board has chosen to separate the roles of Executive Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that this is the optimal leadership structure as it recognizes both Mr. James L. Dolan’s senior executive role with the Company as well as his leadership position on the

Company’s Board while the Company is also able to benefit from the experience of its President and Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Andrea Greenberg, with responsibility for day-to-day management of the Company.

The Board conducts an annual self-assessment to determine whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively. Among other things, the Board’s self-assessment seeks input from the directors on whether they have the tools and access necessary to perform their oversight function as well as

suggestions for improvement of the Board’s functioning. In addition, our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee each conducts its own annual self-assessment, which includes an assessment of the adequacy of their performance as compared to their respective charters.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our directors who are not also executive officers of our Company (the “non-management directors”) or our directors who are independent under the NYSE rules are required to meet regularly in executive sessions with no members of management present. If non-

management directors who are not independent participate in these executive sessions, the independent directors under the NYSE rules are required to meet separately in executive sessions at least once each year.

Our Board believes that risk oversight is an important Board responsibility. The Audit Committee takes the lead on behalf of the Board in this risk oversight role. The Audit Committee discusses guidelines and policies governing the process by which the Company’s management assesses and manages the Company’s exposure to risk, and discusses the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. The Compensation Committee considers the Company’s exposure to risk in establishing and implementing our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent

compensation consultant, reviewed the level of risk incentivized by the Company’s executive compensation program as well as incentive programs below the executive level. Based on this assessment and the executive compensation program’s emphasis on long-term performance, its close connection to Company-wide performance and its equity-based component designed to align the executive officers’ compensation with the Company’s long-term strategy and growth, the Compensation Committee determined that our executive compensation program does not create incentives for excessive risk-taking that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Our Board has adopted policies designed to allow our stockholders and other interested parties to communicate with our directors. Any interested party who wishes to communicate directly with the Board or any director or the non-management directors as a group should send communications in writing to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, MSG Networks Inc., 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001.

Any person, whether or not an employee, who has a concern with respect to our accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing issues or other matters, may, in a confidential or anonymous manner, communicate those concerns to our Audit Committee by contacting the MSG Networks Integrity Hotline, which is operated by a third-party service provider, at 1-844-761-0392.

Our Board has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics for our directors, officers and employees. A portion of this Code of Conduct and Ethics also serves as a code of conduct and ethics for our senior financial officers, including our principal accounting officer and controller. Among other things, our Code of Conduct and Ethics covers conflicts of interest, disclosure responsibilities, legal compliance, reporting and compliance with the Code of Conduct and Ethics,

confidentiality, corporate opportunities, fair dealing, protection and proper use of Company assets and equal employment opportunity and harassment. The full text of the Code of Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at www.msgnetworks.com. In addition, a copy may be obtained by writing to MSG Networks Inc., 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001; Attention: Corporate Secretary.

As a “controlled company” we have the right to elect not to comply with the corporate governance rules of the NYSE requiring: (i) a majority of independent directors on our Board, (ii) an independent corporate governance and nominating committee, and (iii) an independent compensation committee. Because of our status as a “controlled company” we have elected not to maintain a majority of independent directors on our Board or to have a corporate governance and nominating committee. We comply with the requirement for an independent compensation committee.

Our Board elected not to comply with the requirement for a majority of independent directors on our Board because of our voting structure. Under the terms of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (“Certificate of Incorporation”), the holders of the Company’s Class B Common Stock have the right to elect up to 75% of the members of our Board and there is no

requirement that any of those directors be independent or be chosen independently.

However, our Board has determined that each of the Class A director nominees is “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE and the SEC: Joseph J. Lhota, Joel M. Litvin and John L. Sykes. In reaching its determination, the Board considered following:

As permitted under the NYSE rules, we do not have a nominating committee and believe it is appropriate not to have one because of our stockholder voting structure. The Board nonetheless has established a nomination mechanism in our Corporate Governance Guidelines for the selection of nominees for election as directors by the holders of our Class A Common Stock (“Class A Directors”) and by the holders of our Class B Common Stock (“Class B Directors”). Nominees for election as Class A Directors are

recommended to the Board by a majority of the independent Class A Directors then in office. Nominees for election as Class B Directors are recommended to our Board by a majority of the Class B Directors then in office. Our Certificate of Incorporation provides holders of the Company’s Class B Common Stock the right to elect up to 75% of the members of our Board and holders of our Class A Common Stock the right to elect 25% of the members of our Board.

Our Board believes that each director nominee should be evaluated based on the skills needed on the Board and his or her individual merits, taking into account, among other matters, the factors set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines under “Board Composition” and “Selection of Directors.” Those factors include:

The Class A Directors evaluate and recommend Class A Director candidates to the Board for nomination as Class A Directors and suggest

individuals for the Board to explore in more depth. The Board also considers Class A Director nominees recommended by our stockholders. Nominees recommended by our stockholders are given consideration in the same manner as other nominees. Stockholders who wish to submit nominees for consideration by the Board for election at our 2018 annual meeting of our stockholders may do so by submitting in writing such nominees’ names, in compliance with the procedures and along with other information required by the Company’s Amended By-laws. See “Other Matters — Stockholder Proposals for 2018 Annual Meeting.”

The Class B Directors will consult from time to time with one or more of the holders of our Class B Common Stock to ensure that all Class B Director nominees recommended to the Board are individuals who will make a meaningful contribution as Board members and will be individuals likely to receive the approving vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Class B Common Stock. The Class B Directors do not intend to consider unsolicited suggestions of nominees by holders of our Class A Common Stock. We believe that this is appropriate in light of the voting provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation which provides the holders of our Class B Common Stock the exclusive right to elect our Class B Directors.

The Board met four times during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 and all of the directors who were on the Board during such time attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and, as applicable, the committees of the Board on which he or she served.

We encourage our directors to attend annual meetings of our stockholders and believe that attendance at annual meetings is equally as important as attendance at Board and committee meetings. All of the directors, except one, attended the 2016 annual stockholders’ meeting.

The primary purposes and responsibilities of our Audit Committee are to:

Our Board has determined that each member of our Audit Committee is “independent” within the meaning of the rules of both the NYSE and the SEC, and that each has not participated in the preparation of the financial statements of the Company or any current subsidiary of the Company at any time during the past three years and is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including balance sheets, income statements and cash flow statements. Our Board has also determined that Mr. Lhota is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules of the SEC.

Our Board has established a procedure whereby complaints or concerns with respect to accounting, internal controls, auditing and other matters may be submitted to the Audit Committee. This procedure is described under “Board and Governance Practices — Communicating with Our Directors.”

The text of our Audit Committee charter is available on our website at www.msgnetworks.com under Investors — Corporate Governance. A copy may be obtained by writing to MSG Networks Inc., Corporate Secretary, 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001.

The primary purposes and responsibilities of our Compensation Committee are to:

The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of the Senior Employees, evaluates their performance in light of those goals and objectives and, either as a committee or together with any other

independent directors (as directed by the Board) determines and approves the Senior Employees’ compensation level based on this evaluation. In determining the long-term incentive component of our President and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considers, among other factors, the Company’s performance and relative stockholder return, the value of similar incentive awards to Chief Executive Officers at comparable companies and the awards given to the President and Chief Executive Officer in past years. As discussed above, our Board has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is “independent” under the rules of the NYSE.

The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, delegate a portion of its duties and responsibilities to one or more subcommittees of the Compensation Committee. For example, the Compensation Committee may delegate the approval of certain transactions to a subcommittee consisting solely of members of the Compensation Committee who are (i) “non-employee directors” for the purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and (ii) “outside directors” for the purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code (“Section 162(m)”). The Compensation Committee has delegated the approval of certain Section 162(m)-related compensation decisions relating to granting, and determining the level of performance under, performance-based compensation to a subcommittee comprised of Messrs. Litvin and Sykes. The Compensation Committee may also engage outside compensation consultants to assist in the performance of its duties and responsibilities.

The text of our Compensation Committee charter is available on our website at www.msgnetworks.com. A copy may be obtained by writing to MSG Networks Inc., Corporate Secretary, 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001.

Messrs. Lhota, Litvin and Sykes serve as members of the Compensation Committee. Neither Mr. Litvin nor Mr. Sykes is a current or a former executive officer or

employee of the Company. Mr. Lhota was an employee of the Company from June 2, 2010 to November 9, 2011.

In addition to standing committees, the Company has adopted a policy whereby a committee of our Board

consisting entirely of independent directors (an “Independent Committee”) will review and approve

or take such other action as it may deem appropriate with respect to transactions involving the Company and its subsidiaries in which any director, executive officer, greater than 5% stockholder of the Company or any other “related person” (as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K adopted by the SEC) has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. This approval requirement covers any transaction that meets the related party disclosure requirements of the SEC as set forth in Item 404, which currently apply to transactions (or any series of similar transactions) in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000.

Our Board has also adopted a special approval policy for transactions with MSG and AMC Networks Inc. (“AMC Networks”) and their respective subsidiaries whether or not such transactions qualify as “related party” transactions described above. Under this

policy, the Independent Committee oversees approval of all transactions and arrangements between the Company and its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and each of MSG and its subsidiaries and AMC Networks and its subsidiaries, on the other hand, in which the amount exceeds $120,000. To simplify the administration of the approval process under this policy, the Independent Committee may, where appropriate, establish guidelines for certain of these transactions.

Currently, and throughout our fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, our Audit Committee (which consisted solely of Class A Directors) served as the Independent Committee under the above policies. For a further discussion of the scope of these policies, see “Related Party Transaction Approval Policy.”

Our Amended By-Laws permit the Board to form an Executive Committee of the Board which would have the power to exercise all of the powers and authority of the Board in the management of the business and

affairs of the Company, except as limited by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Our Board has not formed an Executive Committee, although it could do so in the future.

The following table describes the components of our non-management directors’ compensation program in

effect during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017:

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by each person who served as a non-management director during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. Directors who are employees of the

Company receive no compensation for service as directors and are therefore not identified in the table below.

The Board has nominated 12 directors for re-election to the Board at this year’s annual meeting.

Of the 12 director nominees, three are to be elected by the holders of our Class A Common Stock and nine are to be elected by the holders of our Class B Common Stock. All 12 nominees have been nominated for a term to expire at the 2018 annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.

The Company representatives appointed by the Board (the persons named on the proxy card, or, if applicable, their substitutes) will vote your shares as you instruct. If you sign your proxy card and return it without indicating how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be voted to elect each of the director nominees below, as applicable, based on whether you are a holder of Class A Common Stock

or Class B Common Stock. Information on each of our nominees is given below.

Each director nominee listed below has consented to being named in this proxy statement and has agreed to serve if elected. However, if a nominee for election as a director by the holders of our Class A Common Stock becomes unavailable before the election or for good cause will not serve, the persons named on the Class A proxy card would be authorized to vote for a replacement director nominee for election as a director by the holders of our Class A Common Stock if the Board names one. If a nominee for election as a director by the holders of our Class B Common Stock becomes unavailable before the election or for good cause will not serve, the persons named in the Class B proxy card would be authorized to vote for a replacement director nominee for election as a director by the holders of our Class B Common Stock if the Board names one.

Class A Director since December 15, 2016

Committee Membership: Audit (Chair), Compensation

Other Public Company Directorships: None

Career Highlights

Mr. Lhota is the Senior Vice President, Vice Dean and Chief of Staff at NYU Langone Medical Center since 2014 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) since June 2017. In 2013, Mr. Lhota was a candidate for Mayor of the City of New York. He previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the MTA from 2011 to 2012. Mr. Lhota was Executive Vice President of the Company from June 2, 2010 to November 9, 2011 and Executive Vice President of Cablevision from 2002 to 2010. Mr. Lhota was also the New York City Deputy Mayor for Operations from 1997 to 2001 and New York City

Budget Director from 1995 to 1997. Mr. Lhota was an investment banker from 1980 to 1994. Prior to that, he was a Senior Accountant with Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Lhota previously served as a director and the chairman of the audit committee of FirstAviation Services, Inc. from 2002 until it became a private company in 2015, and a director of Cablevision from 2014 until its sale in June 2016.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of Mr. Lhota’s experience as a former executive of the Company, his experience as a senior executive and director of other public companies, his knowledge of the industry, his government service (including leading a major governmental organization) and his experience as an investment banker and accountant, our Board has concluded that Mr. Lhota should serve as a director of the Company.

Class A Director since September 30, 2015

Committee Membership: Audit, Compensation

Other Public Company Directorships: None

Career Highlights

Mr. Litvin was the President, League Operations, of the NBA from 2006 until his retirement on September 1, 2015. As the NBA’s President, League Operations, he managed several core areas of the day-to-day operations of the NBA, including the league’s security, player development, social responsibility and legal functions. Mr. Litvin also managed, on behalf of the NBA Board of Governors, franchise matters such as revenue sharing, team sales and financings, relocations and the NBA’s ownership and debt policies. Mr. Litvin initially joined the NBA as a staff attorney in 1988 and also served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel from 1999 to 2000 and Executive Vice President, Legal and Business Affairs, from 2000 to 2006. Mr. Litvin began his professional career at the New York law firm of Willkie Farr &

Gallagher, where he worked on several matters for Major League Baseball. Mr. Litvin currently serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame and the Board of Directors of Hunger Free America. He is also a co-founder and Director of Animal Defense Partnership, a non-profit organization that provides legal and other professional services to organizations devoted to defending animals from cruelty in all forms.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of Mr. Litvin’s more than 27 years of business experience at the NBA (including as the chief NBA league office liaison to the NBA Board of Governors), his extensive knowledge about the sports and sports media businesses, his management and legal experience, and his service on the board of a charitable institution, our Board has concluded that Joel M. Litvin should serve as a director of the Company.

Class A Director since August 5, 2015

Committee Membership: Audit, Compensation (Chair)

Other Public Company Directorships: None

Career Highlights

Mr. Sykes is the President of Entertainment Enterprises for iHeartMedia, Inc. (formerly CC Media Holdings, Inc.), a global media and entertainment company, since January 2012. In his role at iHeartMedia, Mr. Sykes is responsible for developing new business partnerships and platforms across a range of media, including broadcast television, digital video platforms and live events, as well as creating value for iHeartMedia’s advertisers and key partners. Mr. Sykes is the co-executive producer of six annual iHeartRadio live events that are broadcast on network television. He also worked with iHeartMedia in a consulting role during 2011. Prior to joining iHeartMedia, Mr. Sykes was affiliated with the Pilot Group, a private equity and venture firm, from 2008

to 2011. He was a core member of the team at Viacom, Inc. that launched MTV Networks in 1981. During his more than 20-year tenure at Viacom, Mr. Sykes served as President of New Network Development for MTV from 2005 to 2008, Chairman and CEO of Infinity Broadcasting Corporation (now CBS Radio) from 2002 to 2005 and President of the VH1 Cable Television Network from 1994 to 2002. Mr. Sykes also serves on the boards of Shazam Mobile, Critical Content, the Robin Hood Foundation, the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, If Only and Syracuse University’s Newhouse School of Communications.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of Mr. Sykes’s 36 years of business and management experience, his extensive experience in the media, television and entertainment industries and his service on the boards of other companies and charitable institutions, our Board has concluded that John L. Sykes should serve as a director of the Company.

Class B Director since July 29, 2009

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: The Madison Square Garden Company, AMC Networks

Career Highlights

Mr. Dolan is a director and the Executive Chairman of the Company since July 29, 2009. He also assumed the responsibilities of the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from March 15, 2015 to July 15, 2015. Mr. Dolan has also served as a director and the Executive Chairman of MSG since March 4, 2015. Mr. Dolan was Chief Executive Officer of Cablevision from October 1995 until its sale in June 2016. He was President of Cablevision from June 1998 to April 2014; Chief Executive Officer of Rainbow Media Holdings, Inc., a former subsidiary of Cablevision, from September 1992 to October 1995; and Vice President of Cablevision from 1987 to September 1992. In addition to MSG,

Mr. Dolan also serves as a director of AMC Networks and previously served as a director of Cablevision until its sale in June 2016. James L. Dolan is the son of Charles F. Dolan, the father of Quentin F. Dolan, the brother of Thomas C. Dolan, the brother-in-law of Brian G. Sweeney and the cousin of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience in various positions with Cablevision, including as its Chief Executive Officer, his experience in various positions with the Company and its predecessors since 1999 and MSG since the MSG Distribution, including as Executive Chairman of the Company and MSG, as well as the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company, AMC Networks, MSG and Cablevision, our Board has concluded that James L. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

Class B Director since July 29, 2009

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: The Madison Square Garden Company, AMC Networks

Career Highlights

Mr. Dolan is a director and the Executive Chairman of AMC Networks since June 2011. He served as the Chairman of Cablevision from 1985 until its sale in June 2016. He was Chief Executive Officer of Cablevision from 1985 to October 1995. Mr. Dolan founded and acted as the General Partner of Cablevision’s predecessor from 1973 to 1985 and established Manhattan Cable Television in 1961 and Home Box Office in 1971. In addition to AMC Networks, Mr. Dolan serves as a director of MSG, and previously served as a director of Cablevision

until its sale in June 2016. Charles F. Dolan is the father of James L. Dolan and Thomas C. Dolan, father-in-law of Brian G. Sweeney, the grandfather of Quentin F. Dolan and the uncle of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience in the cable television and cable programming industries, as well as his experience as founder of Cablevision, his previous service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cablevision and its predecessors, as well as the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company, AMC Networks, MSG, and Cablevision, our Board has concluded that Charles F. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

Class B Director since September 30, 2015

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: AMC Networks

Career Highlights

Mr. Bell was a consultant to Cablevision from 2005 to 2014. He also held various positions at Cablevision and its predecessor beginning in 1979, including as Cablevision’s Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer until 2004. Mr. Bell is a director of AMC

Networks since June 2011. Mr. Bell also serves as a director of the Lustgarten Foundation.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of Mr. Bell’s broad experience in the cable and programming industries for the past 40 years, as well as his experience in various positions with Cablevision and its predecessor, including as its former Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, our Board has concluded that William J. Bell should serve as a director of the Company.

Class B Director since September 30, 2015

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: J.M. Smucker Company

Career Highlights

Mr. Dolan is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Cleveland Indians Major League Baseball (“MLB”) team since 2010. Mr. Dolan was President of the Cleveland Indians from 2004 to 2010 and Vice President and General Counsel from 2000 to 2004. Mr. Dolan has served on multiple committees of the MLB and is currently on the MLB’s Long Range Planning Committee, Ownership Committee and Diversity and Inclusion Committee. Mr. Dolan has been a director and member of the Executive Compensation Committee of the J.M. Smucker Company since 2006, and as of August 15, 2017, serves as the Chair of the Executive Compensation Committee. Mr. Dolan also currently serves as a director of Dix & Eaton, a privately owned

communications and public relations firm, and previously served as a director of Cablevision until its sale in June 2016. Mr. Dolan was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fast Ball Sports Productions, a sports media company, from 2006 through 2012. Paul J. Dolan is the nephew of Charles F. Dolan, a cousin by marriage of Brian G. Sweeney, and the cousin of James L. Dolan, Thomas C. Dolan and Quentin F. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his extensive business and management experience in the sports and media industries, his experience as a member of Cablevision’s founding family, the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and the contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company and of Cablevision, and his service on the board of another public company, our Board has concluded that Paul J. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

Class B Director since September 30, 2015

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: None

Career Highlights

Mr. Dolan is a student at New York University. Mr. Dolan has held internship positions at Grubman Shire & Meiselas, P.C. and Azoff MSG Entertainment, LLC. Quentin F. Dolan is the son of James L. Dolan, the grandson of Charles F. Dolan, the

nephew of Thomas C. Dolan and Brian G. Sweeney, and the cousin of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and the contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company as well as being a member of the third generation of Cablevision’s founding family, our Board has concluded that Quentin F. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

Class B Director since February 9, 2010

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: The Madison Square Garden Company, AMC Networks

Career Highlights

Mr. Dolan was the Executive Vice President, Strategy and Development, Office of the Chairman of Cablevision from September 2008 until its sale in June 2016. He was Chief Executive Officer of Rainbow Media Corp. from April 2004 to April 2005; Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Cablevision from October 2001 until April 2005; Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Cablevision from February 1996 to October 2001; Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Cablevision from July 1994 to February 1996; General Manager of Cablevision’s East End Long Island cable system from November 1991 to July 1994 and System

Manager of Cablevision’s East End Long Island cable system from August 1987 to October 1991. Mr. Dolan currently serves as a director of AMC Networks and MSG and previously served as a director of Cablevision until its sale in June 2016. Thomas C. Dolan is the son of Charles F. Dolan, the brother of James L. Dolan, the brother-in-law of Brian G. Sweeney, the uncle of Quentin F. Dolan, and the cousin of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience as a member of Cablevision’s founding family and in various positions with Cablevision, as well as the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company, AMC Networks, MSG and Cablevision, our Board has concluded that Thomas C. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

Class B Director since November 30, 2011

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: The Madison Square Garden Company

Career Highlights

Mr. Hildenbrand was a Senior Advisor of Customer Care, Technology and Networks for Cablevision from January 2013 until its sale in June 2016. He also served in various other roles at Cablevision including: Senior Advisor of Engineering and Technology from March 2006 to January 2013; Executive Vice President of Engineering and Technology from January 2000 to March 2006;

Senior Vice President of Technology from January 1998 to January 2000; Vice President of Engineering Support and Customer Relations from October 1986 to January 1998; and previously served as Director of Engineering for Rainbow Media Holdings, Inc., a former subsidiary of Cablevision, from July 1979 to October 1986. Mr. Hildenbrand serves as a director of MSG.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience in various positions at Cablevision and his familiarity with the Company and MSG, our Board has concluded that Wilt Hildenbrand should serve as a director of the Company.

Class B Director since September 30, 2015

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: None

Career Highlights

Mr. Ratner is President and CEO and a member of the board of Independent Sports and Entertainment (“ISE”), an integrated sports, media, entertainment and management company that represents athletes in the NBA, NFL and MLB, since May 2016. Previously, Mr. Ratner was the Vice Chairman of Cablevision from December 2002 until its sale in June 2016. Mr. Ratner previously served as Vice Chairman of the Company from February 2014 until January 2015, and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from July 2009 to February 2014. Mr. Ratner previously served in various roles at Rainbow Media (the name of AMC Networks while it was a subsidiary of Cablevision), including: Vice Chairman from June 2002 to June 2011; director from April 1997 to September 2003; Chief Operating

Officer from October 1999 to June 2002; Chief Operating Officer and Secretary from October 1998 to October 1999; Executive Vice President and Secretary from October 1997 to October 1998; and Executive Vice President, Legal & Business Affairs and Secretary from July 1993 to October 1997. Mr. Ratner also serves as a director of the Garden of Dreams Foundation and Co-Chairman of the board of Winview Games, a Silicon Valley-based startup focused on mobile two-screen synchronized televised sports games for prizes in the United States.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience in various positions with the Company and its predecessors, including as the Company’s Vice Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer, and the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company and Vice Chairman of Cablevision, our Board has concluded that Hank J. Ratner should serve as a director of the Company.

Class B Director since February 9, 2010

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: The Madison Square Garden Company, AMC Networks

Career Highlights

Mr. Sweeney served as the President of Cablevision from April 2014 and President and Chief Financial Officer of Cablevision from March 2015 until its sale in June 2016. Previously, Mr. Sweeney served in various other roles at Cablevision, including: Senior Executive Vice President, Strategy and Chief of Staff from January 2013 to April 2014; Senior Vice President — Strategic Software Solutions from June 2012 to January 2013; and Senior Vice President — eMedia from January 2000 to June 2012.

Mr. Sweeney serves as a director of AMC Networks and MSG and previously served as a director of Cablevision until its sale in June 2016. Brian G. Sweeney is the son-in-law of Charles F. Dolan, the brother-in-law of James L. Dolan and Thomas C. Dolan, the uncle of Quentin F. Dolan, and the cousin by marriage of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience in various positions with Cablevision, as well as the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company, AMC Networks, MSG and Cablevision, our Board has concluded that Brian G. Sweeney should serve as a director of the Company.

The Audit Committee, comprised of independent members of the Board, has appointed KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm (the independent auditors) with respect to our operations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018. KPMG will audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018. Representatives of KPMG will be present at the annual meeting. Those representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will answer appropriate questions. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that

such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

We are asking that you ratify the appointment of KPMG, although your ratification is not required. Approval of this proposal requires the favorable vote of the majority of the votes cast by the holders of our Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, voting together as a single class. In accordance with our Certificate of Incorporation, holders of our Class A Common Stock will have one vote per share and holders of our Class B Common Stock will have ten votes per share.

The following table provides information about fees for services rendered by KPMG, our independent

registered public accounting firm, for our fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively:

The Audit Committee’s policy requires that the Audit Committee pre-approve audit and non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee may delegate its pre-approval authority to its Chairman provided that any such services are subsequently ratified by the entire Audit Committee. In addition, the Chief Financial Officer may pre-approve the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for audit-related, tax and non-audit services not to exceed $50,000 per engagement provided that such engagement does not impair the external auditor’s independence and is ratified by the Audit Committee at the next Audit Committee meeting. All of the services for which fees were disclosed were pre-approved under the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policy.

The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the Company’s financial reporting, internal controls, and audit functions. As set forth in the charter of the Audit Committee, management of the Company is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s accounting and financial reporting principles, and the Company’s internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The Company’s Internal Audit function is provided to the Company by the Internal Audit Department of MSG through an agreement with MSG. The Internal Audit function provides the Audit Committee and management an independent review function, including reviewing and evaluating the adequacy, effectiveness, and quality of the Company’s system of internal controls.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG, is responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and expressing an opinion on the conformity of the consolidated financial statements to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and KPMG the audited financial statements and its evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed pursuant to PCAOB Auditing

Standard No. 16 (Communications with Audit Committees). The Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee regarding independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with KPMG the firm’s independence. All audit and non-audit services performed by KPMG must be specifically approved by the Audit Committee or by its Chairman (and subject to ratification by the full committee).

As part of its responsibilities for oversight of the risk management process, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s risk assessment and risk management framework, including discussions of individual risk areas as well as a summary of the overall process.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s Internal Audit function and KPMG, the overall scope of and plans for their respective audits. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the Audit Committee met with the head of the Internal Audit Department of MSG (who oversees the provision of internal audit services to the Company under an agreement with MSG) and representatives of KPMG, in regular and executive sessions, to discuss the results of their examinations related to the Company, the evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting and compliance programs.

Based upon the reports, reviews and discussions described in this report, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s 2017 Form 10-K that was filed with the SEC.

Dear Fellow Stockholder,

We thank you for your continued support of MSG Networks. We wish to share with you how the Compensation Committee continues to evolve our executive compensation program and practices to support our long-term strategic goals and drive stockholder value creation. The Compensation Committee regularly reviews our compensation structure against the following four over-arching principles that we believe are core to pay and performance alignment and appropriately motivate our executive officers:

The Compensation Committee also seeks to include the input of our stockholders in the regular evaluation of our programs. During the 2017 fiscal year, management of the Company engaged with holders of approximately 75% of our Class A Common Stock to discuss our Board, governance and compensation practices, with the specific goal of seeking stockholder feedback. Management shares the results of such discussions with the Compensation Committee.

In the 2017 fiscal year, as a direct result of stockholder feedback and the Compensation Committee’s regular review of our programs, we have made a number of enhancements that we believe further align our compensation practices with our long-term strategy and the interests of our stockholders, including the adoption of an anti-pledging policy and enhanced disclosure in our Compensation Discussion & Analysis.

Further detail on our compensation program and these changes are included in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis that follows. We are committed to maintaining a compensation structure that aligns pay with performance and effectively motivates our executive officers to continue driving long-term value creation for our stockholders. We welcome continued stockholder feedback on our executive compensation practices and look forward to continued dialogue with you.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides a discussion of our compensation

philosophy and 2017 compensation for the following NEOs:

The Company, an industry leader in sports production, and content development and distribution, owns and operates two award-winning regional sports and entertainment networks, MSG Network and MSG+, and a live streaming and video on demand platform, MSG GO. For more than 40 years, we have been a pioneer in regional sports television, setting a standard of excellence, creativity and technological innovation. Today, our exclusive award-winning programming

continues to be a valuable differentiator for our viewers, advertisers and the cable, satellite, telephone and other platforms that distribute our networks. Our networks are widely distributed throughout our territory, which includes all of New York State and significant portions of New Jersey and Connecticut, as well as parts of Pennsylvania. Our networks are also carried nationally by certain distributors on sports tiers or in similar packages.

During the 2017 fiscal year, we again generated strong financial results for our stockholders. This strong performance reflects the strength of our highly-valued exclusive live content, as well as our dedication to delivering a compelling lineup of original programming to our distributors, advertisers and viewers. Financial highlights for the fiscal year included:

During the 2017 fiscal year, we engaged with holders of approximately 75% of our Class A Common Stock on our Board, governance and compensation practices, with the specific goal of seeking stockholder feedback.

In the 2017 fiscal year, in response to our stockholder feedback and the Compensation Committee’s regular review of our programs, including consultation with the compensation consultant, we have made a number of enhancements to our practices and disclosures that we believe further align our compensation practices

with our long-term strategy and the interests of our stockholders. Specifically, we:

The Company competes for talent among a wide array of media and entertainment companies. Our executive officers have substantial and meaningful professional experience in the industry in which the Company operates.

The Company places great importance on its ability to attract, retain, motivate and reward experienced executive officers who can drive our business objectives and achieve strong financial and

operational performance as well as long-term value creation. The Compensation Committee has designed executive compensation policies and programs that are consistent with, explicitly linked to, and supportive of, the strategic objectives of growing the Company’s businesses and maximizing long-term stockholder value. Our Compensation Committee has designed a program that reflects four key overarching executive compensation principles:

In designing the executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee seeks to fulfill these objectives by maintaining appropriate balances

between (1) short-term and long-term compensation, (2) cash and equity compensation, and (3) performance-based and time-based compensation.

The Company compensates its NEOs through salary, annual incentive awards, long-term incentive awards, perquisites and benefit programs. Our annual and long-term incentive programs provide performance-based incentives for our NEOs tied to key financial and strategic measures that drive long-term stockholder value and reward sustained achievement of the Company’s key financial goals. The Company considers Company revenue and AOI to be the key

measures of the Company’s operating performance. As such, our Compensation Committee has incorporated these performance metrics into our incentive plans, along with other specific strategic and operating metrics.

The table below summarizes the current elements of our compensation program and how each element supports the Company’s compensation objectives:

As described above, the Company’s compensation program is designed with significant long-term performance-based and at-risk components. For the

2017 fiscal year, a majority of NEO compensation was at risk, with a majority of at risk compensation granted in the form of long-term equity-based awards.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, annual incentives for the NEOs were awarded at 123.5% of target, in line with calculated results under our

Management Performance Incentive Plan, as discussed further below.

The Company’s executive compensation program is overseen by the wholly independent Compensation Committee, with the support of an independent

compensation consultant. We maintain a compensation program with strong governance features, including:

The following discussion describes the practices and policies implemented by the Compensation Committee during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. For the 2017 fiscal year, compensation for the NEOs was subject to employment agreements approved by the Company’s Compensation Committee. Information concerning the Company’s current employment agreements with each NEO is set forth below under “Executive Compensation Tables — Employment Agreements.”

The Compensation Committee considered the results of its most recent advisory “say-on-pay” proposal held in 2014, as well as the Company’s ongoing discussions with stockholders, in its assessment and development of the compensation program. These factors, among other considerations, contributed to our decision to adopt an anti-pledging policy and enhance disclosure related to our compensation program.

Our Compensation Committee administers our executive compensation program. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter. Among other responsibilities, the Compensation Committee (1) establishes our general compensation philosophy and, in consultation with management, oversees the development and implementation of compensation programs; (2) reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our executive officers who are required to file reports with

the SEC under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, evaluates their performance in light of those goals and objectives, and determines and approves their respective compensation level based on this evaluation; (3) oversees the activities of the committee or committees administering our retirement and benefit plans; and (4) administers our stockholder-approved compensation plans. For more information about the Compensation Committee, please see “Board and Governance Practices — Committees — Compensation Committee.”

The Compensation Committee has authority under its charter to engage outside consultants to assist in the performance of its duties and responsibilities. Our Compensation Committee utilizes the services of ClearBridge Compensation Group LLC (the “compensation consultant”), an independent compensation consultant, to assist in determining whether the elements of our executive compensation program are reasonable and consistent with our objectives.

The compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee and, at the request of the Compensation Committee, the compensation consultant meets with members of management from time to time for purposes of gathering information on management proposals and recommendations to be presented to the Compensation Committee.

The services provided by the compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 included:

During the 2017 fiscal year, the compensation consultant provided no services to the Company other than those provided to the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee charter requires the Compensation Committee to consider the NYSE independence factors before receiving advice from an advisor, despite the fact that such independence rules are not applicable to controlled companies. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the Compensation Committee concluded that the compensation consultant satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE rules. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that the compensation consultant’s work did not raise any conflicts of interest during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee considered the same rules regarding advisor independence.

The Compensation Committee reviews the performance and compensation of the Executive Chairman and the President and Chief Executive Officer and, following discussions with the compensation consultant, establishes each of their compensation. Senior management of the Company assists the Compensation Committee and the compensation consultant as described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and provides to the Compensation Committee, either directly or through the compensation consultant, management’s

recommendations on the compensation for executive officers other than the Executive Chairman and the President and Chief Executive Officer. Other members of management provide support to the Compensation Committee as needed. Based upon a review of performance and historical compensation, recommendations and information from members of management, and discussions with the compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee determines and approves compensation for the executive officers.

As described below under “— Elements of Our Compensation Program,” performance-based incentive compensation is an important element of the Company’s executive compensation program.

Generally, the performance objectives for the Company’s incentive compensation have been based on Company revenues and AOI. The Company considers these performance objectives to be key measures of the Company’s operating performance.

The Company defines AOI, which is a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, as operating income (loss)

before (i) depreciation, amortization and impairments of property and equipment and intangible assets, (ii) share-based compensation expense or benefit, (iii) restructuring charges or credits and (iv) gains or losses on sales or dispositions of businesses. Because it is based on operating income (loss), AOI also excludes interest expense (including cash interest expense) and other non-operating income and expense items. At the time of grant of an award, the performance measures used may contemplate certain potential future adjustments and exclusions.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed tally sheets prepared by the compensation consultant, setting forth all components of compensation payable, and the benefits accruing, to the NEOs for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, including all cash

compensation, benefits, perquisites and the current value of outstanding equity-based awards. The tally sheets also set forth potential payouts to the NEOs upon various termination scenarios.

As part of the Compensation Committee’s review of the total compensation for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the compensation consultant assisted the Compensation Committee in: (1) determining if a peer group should be used for comparative purposes, (2) assessing executive compensation in light of internal and external considerations and (3) reviewing the Company’s equity and cash-based executive incentive programs, taking into account evolving market trends. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with the compensation consultant considered broad market data (industry-related and general industry data) and multiple broad-based compensation surveys in order to appropriately assess compensation levels.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with the compensation consultant, determined not to utilize a peer group or target positioning in determining compensation given the limited number of comparable publicly-traded companies.

Besides the market data listed above, the Compensation Committee considered internal information (historical compensation, job responsibility, experience, parity among executive officers, contractual commitments and attraction and retention of talent) to determine compensation.

Our executive compensation philosophy is reflected in the principal elements of our executive compensation program, each of which is important to the Company’s desire to attract, retain, motivate and reward highly-qualified executive officers. The compensation program included the following key elements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017: base salary, annual cash incentives, long-term incentives, retirement, health and welfare and other

benefits, which are generally provided to all other eligible employees, and additional executive officer benefits, including post-termination compensation under certain circumstances and certain perquisites, each as described below.

A significant percentage of total direct compensation is allocated to incentive compensation in accordance with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy. The

Compensation Committee reviews historical Company compensation, other information provided by the compensation consultant and other factors, such as experience, performance, length of service and contractual commitments, to determine the appropriate level and mix of compensation for executive officers. The allocation between cash and equity compensation and short-term and long-term compensation is designed to provide a variety of fixed and at-risk compensation that is related to the achievement of the Company’s short-term and long-term objectives.

The compensation program and philosophies discussed in this proxy statement reflect only

compensation that is paid by the Company for services rendered to the Company. Mr. Dolan is also employed by MSG as its Executive Chairman and Mr. Burian is also employed by MSG as its Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Messrs. Dolan and Burian receive separate compensation from MSG with respect to such employment. For more information regarding the respective compensation of Messrs. Dolan and Burian by MSG, see MSG’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed with the SEC on October 27, 2017.

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for setting the base salaries of the executive officers, which are intended to compensate them for the day-to-day services performed for the Company. Base salaries for these executive officers have been set at levels that are intended to reflect the competitive marketplace in attracting and retaining quality executive officers. The employment agreements between the Company and the NEOs contain a minimum base salary level. For information regarding these minimum base salary levels, please see “Executive Compensation Tables — Employment Agreements” below. The Compensation Committee reviews the salaries of the executive officers at least annually. The Compensation Committee may adjust base salaries for executive officers over time, based on their performance and experience and in accordance with the terms of their employment agreements.

The base salaries paid by the Company to each of

Mr. Dolan, Ms. Greenberg, Messrs. Richter and Burian, and Ms. Darino-Gorski in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 were as follows: $1,003,212, $833,462, $649,874, $307,512, and $358,763, respectively. See footnote 1 to “Executive Compensation Tables — Summary Compensation Table” for a more detailed discussion of the base salaries paid during the Company’s fiscal year. Effective September 1, 2017, annual base salaries of Ms. Greenberg, Mr. Richter and Ms. Darino-Gorski were increased to $1,000,000, $700,000 and $370,774, respectively. The base salaries for Messrs. Dolan and Mr. Burian are $1,000,000 and $309,000, respectively, and did not change from the prior year. The Compensation Committee determined salaries for NEOs after evaluation of Company and individual performance, market pay levels, the range of increases generally provided to the Company’s employees and, to the extent appropriate, management’s recommendations.

Annual cash incentives in the 2017 fiscal year were determined by performance against goals: under the Management Performance Incentive Plan (“MPIP”) for the purpose of determining the final annual incentive payouts, and under the Cash Incentive Plan (“CIP”) for the purpose of achieving tax deductibility under Section 162(m).

This annual incentive is designed to link executive compensation directly to the Company’s performance by providing incentives and rewards based upon business performance during the applicable fiscal year, while preserving the tax deductibility of awards under Section 162(m).

Each employee eligible for an annual incentive award is assigned a target award equal to a percentage of that employee’s base salary earned during the applicable fiscal year. The target annual incentive awards are based upon the applicable employee’s position, grade level, responsibilities, and historical and expected future contributions to the Company. In addition, each employment agreement between the Company and

each of the NEOs contains a minimum target annual incentive award level. See “Executive Compensation Tables — Employment Agreements” below. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion and subject to the terms of employment agreements, may revise target annual incentive award levels for the executive officers.

The below table summarizes each NEO’s target annual incentive opportunity and the Compensation Committee’s determination of actual 2017 fiscal year annual incentive payouts. Consistent with prior years’ practice, payouts earned under the CIP were reduced

so that the actual 2017 fiscal year annual incentive payouts were in line with calculated payouts under the MPIP. The annual incentive payouts are described in more detail below.

Effective September 1, 2017, the target annual short-term incentive opportunities of Mr. Richter and Ms. Darino-Gorski, as a percentage of base salary, were increased to 100% and 40%, respectively. These increases reflect Mr. Richter and Ms. Darino-Gorski’s role and performance, as well as their competitive market positioning.

MPIP awards to all eligible employees are conditioned upon the satisfaction of predetermined financial and strategic objectives, weighted at 80%

and 20%, respectively. Final MPIP results are calculated based on performance achievement against these predetermined goals.

Financial Component (80%): For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the MPIP financial performance objectives included rigorous Company revenue and AOI targets, with potential payouts under this component ranging from 0-200% of target. The level

of payout is determined based on the extent to which the Company’s annual financial performance exceeded or missed the predetermined targets, as outlined below:

Strategic Component (20%): For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the MPIP also included a performance component that measures achievement against strategic objectives set at the beginning of the year.

Management establishes four strategic goals with up to nine discrete metrics under each individual goal, which are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. Each strategic goal is assigned a weight at the beginning of the year and achievement of each goal is evaluated on a four-point scale. The strategic component for NEO payouts is

calculated based on the extent to which the objectives are achieved or missed in the fiscal year.

Based on the Company’s performance against the predetermined metrics, the payout result of the strategic component of the MPIP was achieved at 137.5% of target.

MPIP Payout: As a result of the level of achievement of the financial and strategic objectives, as discussed above, the MPIP paid out at 123.5% of the target level.

While the MPIP is used to determine annual incentive amounts, NEOs receive annual incentive awards

under the CIP to preserve tax deductibility.

For the 2017 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee used Company AOI as the financial

measure for CIP funding, with no awards payable under the plan if an AOI threshold for the Company

of $224.0 million was not achieved. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, our Company AOI was $334.1 million, and the CIP bonus pool was funded. The

Compensation Committee used negative discretion to bring CIP payout levels down to the same level as payouts calculated under the MPIP.

Long-term incentives represent a substantial portion of our executive officers’ annual total direct compensation. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, our long-term incentive programs were comprised of performance stock units, restricted stock units, performance stock options, and time-based stock options.

The Committee believes this equity mix:

The following table summarizes our 2017 fiscal year long-term incentive awards for all NEOs:

For the 2017 fiscal year, Mr. Dolan did not receive restricted stock units and performance stock units, and instead received time-based stock options and performance stock options as contemplated by his employment agreement. Half of the stock options are subject to performance-based vesting conditions, with the same performance conditions that are used for performance stock units; half of the stock options are subject to time-based vesting, with the same vesting schedule that is used for restricted stock units. The Compensation Committee views stock options as inherently performance based because our stock price needs to increase for Mr. Dolan to recognize value, and therefore the Compensation Committee believes that this award structure establishes further alignment with our stockholders.

Additional information regarding long-term incentive awards granted to NEOs during the 2017 fiscal year is set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” and the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table under “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

Effective September 1, 2017, the target annual long-term incentive opportunities of Ms. Greenberg, Mr. Richter and Ms. Darino-Gorski were increased to $3,000,000, $850,000 and $410,000, respectively. These increases reflect Ms. Greenberg, Mr. Richter and Ms. Darino-Gorski’s role and performance, as well as their competitive market positioning.

Performance stock units are intended to align our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders, with a focus on long-term financial results. Under our executive compensation program for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, performance stock units were granted to executive officers and

certain other members of management (other than Mr. Dolan) pursuant to the 2010 Employee Stock Plan, as amended (the “Employee Stock Plan”). With respect to NEOs, the performance stock units were designed to achieve tax deductibility under Section 162(m).

In September 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the following awards of performance stock units to the NEOs (with the exception of Mr. Dolan)

for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 (for the 2017-2019 performance period):

Performance stock units are structured to be settled at the end of the three-year performance period, to the extent the applicable pre-determined financial performance goals are met.

For the 2017 fiscal year performance stock units granted in September 2016 for the 2017-2019 performance period, the Compensation Committee selected total Company revenue and AOI as the two financial metrics. Goals were set at the beginning of the fiscal year based on the Company’s five-year

strategic plan, which is subject to review by the Board in connection with approval of the annual budget. The Company’s five-year strategic plan is confidential and disclosure of those targets could provide information that could lead to competitive harm, and for this reason the three-year performance stock unit financial

performance targets are not disclosed; however, the Compensation Committee seeks to make target goals

ambitious, while threshold goals are expected to be achievable.

Performance stock unit payout opportunity ranges from 0 to 110% of target, based on performance and subject to continued employment. At the threshold performance level, 90% of the target performance stock units would pay out, and at or above the maximum performance level, 110% of the target performance stock units would pay out. If the Company exceeds threshold levels but does not achieve the targeted rates, or if the Company achieves or exceeds one target but not both, the award provides for partial payments. No performance stock units pay out if the Company fails to achieve threshold levels of performance.

The Company intends to disclose the Company Revenue and AOI payout results as a percentage of target as well as the resulting payout for the 2017-2019 performance stock units as a percentage of target at the end of the performance period.

All performance stock unit financial performance goals are intended to satisfy tax deductibility requirements under Section 162(m).

In connection with the MSG Distribution, the Compensation Committee exercised its negative discretion with respect to the cash performance awards granted to its NEOs in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. As such, in September 2017, after the end of the performance period, the cash performance

awards granted to the NEOs in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 were paid in cash at their respective target values. See footnote 5 to “Executive Compensation Tables — Summary Compensation Table” for the amount paid to each NEO in respect of these cash performance awards.

Restricted stock units serve to align executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders and promote the retention of employees, including the NEOs.

In September 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the following awards of restricted stock units to the NEOs (with the exception of Mr. Dolan) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 pursuant to the Company’s Employee Stock Plan:

Restricted stock units vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant subject to continued employment, and include a performance

threshold designed to achieve tax deductibility under Section 162(m) for eligible NEOs.

For the 2017 fiscal year restricted stock units, the Section 162(m) performance objectives required the AOI of the Company in any of the fiscal years ending on June 30, 2017, June 30, 2018 or June 30, 2019 to exceed 75% of the 2016 fiscal year AOI of the Company.

On September 1, 2017, the Compensation Committee certified the achievement of the performance objectives for the awards held by NEOs, based on

AOI of the Company for the 2017 fiscal year ($334.1 million) exceeding 75% of the AOI of the Company for the 2016 fiscal year ($224.0 million).

Stock options establish a close alignment with stock price performance and with our stockholders’ interests. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, Mr. Dolan received:

The performance conditions and vesting schedules for the performance stock options are identical to those for the performance stock units. The vesting schedule for the time-based stock options is identical to that of the restricted stock units; however, the time-based

stock options do not have a separate Section 162(m) performance objective given that time-based stock options are not required to have performance objectives in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m). See “— Performance Stock Units” and “— Restricted Stock Units” above for additional information.

In September 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the following stock option awards to Mr. Dolan for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 pursuant to the Company’s Employee Stock Plan:

The Company’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits all directors and employees (including NEOs) from (i) engaging in short sales or other “hedging”

transactions and (ii) placing securities in margin accounts or otherwise pledging Company securities.

Under our executive compensation program for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, annual restricted stock unit awards to NEOs vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant and annual performance stock unit awards to NEOs cliff-vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, in each case, so long as the recipient is continuously employed by the Company until the applicable vesting date (and subject to the performance conditions described above). With respect to our non-management directors, and as discussed above under “— Director Compensation,” compensation includes annual awards of restricted stock units. Pursuant to the

award agreements, directors’ restricted stock units are settled in shares of Company stock (or, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, cash) on the first business day following 90 days after service on the Board ceases (other than in the event of a director’s death, where the restricted stock units are settled immediately). One effect of the cliff- and three-year ratable vesting (with respect to our NEOs and eligible employees) and the holding requirements (with respect to our non-management directors) is to require each of our non-management directors, NEOs and eligible employees to maintain significant holdings of Company securities at all times.

Benefits offered to executive officers generally provide for retirement income and serve as a safety net against hardships that can arise from illness,

disability or death. The executive officers are generally eligible to participate in the same health and welfare benefit plans made available to the other

benefits-eligible employees of the Company, including, for example, medical, dental, vision, life insurance and disability coverage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Messrs. Dolan and Burian do not

participate in certain Company benefit plans, including the Company’s medical, dental and vision plans, as they receive such benefits from MSG.

Prior to the MSG Distribution, the Company sponsored the MSG Holdings, L.P. Cash Balance Pension Plan (the “Cash Balance Pension Plan”), a tax-qualified defined benefit plan, for participating employees, including certain executive officers. At the time of the MSG Distribution, the Cash Balance Pension Plan was transferred to MSG, but eligible employees of the Company received a full year of credit under the Cash Balance Pension Plan for the 2015 calendar year. Effective March 1, 2011, the Company merged the Madison Square Garden, L.P. Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”), a frozen defined benefit pension plan, into the Cash Balance Pension Plan. Under the MSGN Holdings, L.P.

Excess Cash Balance Plan (the “Excess Cash Balance Plan”), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, the Company provided additional benefits to employees, including certain of the executive officers, who were restricted by the applicable IRS annual compensation limitation. Each of the Cash Balance Pension Plan and Excess Cash Balance Plan were frozen to new participants and future benefit accruals effective as of December 31, 2015.

More information regarding the Cash Balance Pension Plan, the Excess Cash Balance Plan, and the Retirement Plan is provided in the Pension Benefits table under “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

Prior to the MSG Distribution, the Company sponsored the MSG Holdings, L.P. 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”), a tax-qualified retirement savings plan, for participating employees, including executive officers. As of the MSG Distribution, the Savings Plan was transferred to MSG, renamed The Madison Square Garden 401(k) Savings Plan, and amended to be a multiple employer plan to which the Company contributes as a participating employer. Under the Savings Plan, participants may contribute into their plan accounts a percentage of their eligible pay on a before-tax basis as well as a percentage of their eligible pay on an after-tax basis. The Savings Plan provides (a) an immediately vested matching contribution equal to 100% of the first 4% of eligible pay contributed by participating employees and (b) a discretionary non-elective contribution by the Company. In February 2017, the Company provided a

discretionary non-elective contribution with regards to the 2016 calendar year equal to 2% of eligible pay.

In addition, the Company offers the MSGN Holdings, L.P. Excess Savings Plan (the “Excess Savings Plan”), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, to

employees, including executive officers, who are restricted by the applicable IRS annual compensation limitation and/or the pre-tax income deferral limitation. More information regarding the Excess Savings Plan is provided in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table under “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

Matching contributions made by the Company under the Savings Plan and the Excess Savings Plan are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

The Company provides certain perquisites to executive officers as described below. Additional information concerning perquisites received by each

of the NEOs is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

Mr. Dolan has regular access to a car and driver which he is permitted to use for personal use in addition to business purposes. Mr. Dolan’s car and driver are provided by MSG and a portion of such costs are reimbursed by the Company. In addition, certain other executive officers and members of management have

had access to cars and drivers on a limited basis for personal use. To the extent employees used a car and driver for personal use without reimbursement to the Company, those employees were imputed compensation for tax purposes.

The Company has access to certain aircraft through time sharing arrangements with a subsidiary of MSG. Additionally, Mr. Dolan has access to helicopter travel pursuant to arrangements made by MSG for personal travel, which has primarily been for purposes of commutation. The Company and MSG have agreed on an allocation of the costs of such personal helicopter use. See “Transactions with Related Parties — Aircraft Arrangements.”

The Company is typically reimbursed for the incremental costs associated with the personal use of aircraft (other than for commutation). To the extent

any executive officer or other employee used any of the aircraft for personal travel without reimbursement to the Company, they were imputed compensation for tax purposes based on the Standard Industry Fare Level rates that are published biannually by the IRS. For compensation reporting purposes, we valued the incremental cost of the personal use of the aircraft based on the variable costs incurred by the Company net of any reimbursements received from executive officers. The incremental cost of the use of the aircraft does not include any costs that would have been incurred by the Company whether or not the personal trip was taken.

Mr. Dolan participates in MSG’s executive security program. The Company and MSG agreed on an allocation of the costs of such participation in their security program. See “Transactions with Related

Parties — Relationship Between Us, MSG and AMC Networks.” Because certain of these costs can be viewed as conveying personal benefits to Mr. Dolan, they are reported as perquisites.

From time to time certain employees, including the NEOs (and their guests), have access to tickets to events at MSG’s venues at no cost, and may also purchase tickets at face value. Attendance at such

events is integrally and directly related to the performance of their duties, and, as such, we do not deem the receipt of such tickets to be perquisites.

We believe that post-termination benefits are integral to the Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified executive officers.

Under certain circumstances, payments or other benefits may be provided to employees upon the termination of their employment with the Company. These may include payments or other benefits upon a termination by the Company without cause, termination by the employee for good reason, other voluntary termination by the employee, retirement,

death, disability or termination following a change in control of the Company or following a going private transaction. With respect to the NEOs, the amounts and terms of such payments and other benefits (including the definition of “cause” and “good reason”) are governed by each NEO’s employment agreement and any applicable award agreements. Post-termination compensation is discussed in greater detail in “Executive Compensation Tables — Employment Agreements” and “— Termination and Severance” below.

Section 162(m) establishes a $1 million limit on the amount that a publicly held corporation may deduct for compensation paid to the chief executive officer and the next three most highly paid NEOs (other than the chief financial officer) in a taxable year. This limitation does not apply to any compensation that is “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m), which is defined as compensation paid in connection with certain stock options or that is paid only if the individual’s performance meets pre-established objective goals based on performance criteria established under a plan approved by our stockholders. Our short-term and long-term incentive compensation plans are generally designed to qualify for this exemption from the deduction limitations of Section 162(m) and to be consistent with providing appropriate compensation to executive officers. The Company’s stockholders approved an amended CIP at the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting on December 11, 2015, and an amended Employee Stock Plan on December 15, 2016.

The Compensation Committee has delegated the approval of certain Section 162(m)-related compensation decisions relating to granting, and determining the level of performance under, performance-based compensation to a subcommittee comprised of Messrs. Litvin and Sykes. From time to time, to the extent it deems appropriate, the Compensation Committee may make awards (or modifications to awards) or pay compensation that would not qualify for an exemption from Section 162(m). Although it is the Company’s intent generally to qualify compensation for the exemption from the deduction limitations, we believe that it is in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders to allow the Compensation Committee the flexibility and discretion to design an appropriate executive compensation program so that the Company can attract, retain, motivate and reward our executive officers, notwithstanding Section 162(m).

In connection with the MSG Distribution, each holder of an employee restricted stock unit that was granted prior to July 1, 2015 received one MSG restricted stock unit in respect of every three employee restricted stock units owned on the record date (each such MSG restricted stock unit, an “MSG Distribution Unit”) and continues to be entitled to a share of our Class A Common Stock (or cash or other property) for each employee restricted stock unit in accordance with the existing award agreement. In connection with the MSG Distribution, each employee restricted stock unit that was granted after July 1, 2015 was adjusted in accordance with its terms, such that (1) each holder who remained employed by the Company following the MSG Distribution continued to hold the employee restricted stock units, with the number of employee restricted stock units adjusted to reflect the MSG Distribution to maintain the value of the employee restricted stock units, and (2) each holder employed by MSG following the MSG Distribution received

MSG restricted stock units of the same value as such employee restricted stock units, and the original employee restricted stock units were cancelled. Any holder of employee restricted stock units granted after July 1, 2015, who was employed by both MSG and us following the MSG Distribution continued to hold our employee restricted stock units, adjusted to reflect the MSG Distribution, and received MSG restricted stock units in connection with the MSG Distribution, so that 30% of the value of the employee’s restricted stock units were our employee restricted stock units and 70% of the value of the employee’s restricted stock units were MSG restricted stock units.

With respect to outstanding long-term cash and equity awards, the Company, MSG and AMC Networks are not regarded as competitive entities of each other for purposes of any non-competition provisions contained in the applicable award agreements.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee

recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for filing with the SEC.

The tables below reflect the compensation of the Company’s NEOs. See “Compensation Discussion

and Analysis” for an explanation of our compensation philosophy and program.

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by each of our NEOs for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Following the MSG Distribution, our Executive Chairman and our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary are shared employees of the Company and MSG, therefore the information set forth below for periods following the MSG Distribution only reflects the portion of

compensation for those shared NEOs paid by the Company for services rendered to the Company, including amounts paid by the Company to MSG in respect of pre-MSG Distribution compensation paid by MSG (for more information regarding the compensation of Messrs. Dolan and Burian by MSG, see MSG’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed with the SEC on October 27, 2017).

The table below presents information regarding awards granted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 to each NEO under the Company’s plans, including estimated possible and future payouts under

non-equity incentive plan awards and equity incentive plan awards of restricted stock units, performance stock units, time-based stock options and performance stock options.

The table below shows (i) each grant of time-based stock options and performance-based restricted stock units that are unexercised and outstanding and (ii) the aggregate number and value of unvested restricted stock units and performance stock units outstanding (assuming target performance) for each NEO, in each

case, as of June 30, 2017. References in the footnotes to awards granted in September 2015 mean the awards granted in September 2015, as equitably adjusted into new awards in October 2015 following the MSG Distribution (to the extent such awards were outstanding as of June 30, 2017).

The table below shows restricted stock unit awards that vested during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.

The table below shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of our NEOs, including the number of years of service credited to

each NEO, under our defined benefit pension plans as of June 30, 2017.

The Company maintains several benefit plans for our executive officers. The material terms and conditions are discussed below.

Prior to the MSG Distribution, the Company sponsored the Cash Balance Pension Plan, a tax-qualified defined benefit plan that generally covered regular full-time and part-time non-union employees of the Company and certain of its affiliates who completed one year of service. Effective on March 1, 2011, the Retirement Plan (as described below) was merged into the Cash Balance Pension Plan. The merged plan remains named the Cash Balance Pension Plan, but provides the same benefits that were previously provided by the two separate plans. As of

the MSG Distribution, the Cash Balance Pension Plan was transferred to MSG, and eligible employees of the Company received a full year of credit under the Cash Balance Pension Plan for calendar year 2015. The Cash Balance Pension Plan was frozen to future benefit accruals effective as of December 31, 2015.

A notional account is maintained for each participant under the Cash Balance Pension Plan, including the NEOs (other than Messrs. Dolan and Richter), which consists of (i) annual allocations made by the

Company as of the end of each year on behalf of each participant who has completed 800 hours of service during the year that range from 3% to 9% of the participant’s compensation, based on the participant’s age and (ii) monthly interest credits based on the average of the annual rate of interest on the 30-year U.S. Treasury Bonds for the months of September, October and November of the prior year. Compensation includes all direct cash compensation received while a participant as part of the participant’s primary compensation structure (excluding bonuses, fringe benefits, and other compensation that is not received on a regular basis), and before deductions for elective deferrals, subject to applicable IRS limits.

A participant’s interest in the Cash Balance Pension Plan is subject to vesting limitations for the first three

years of employment. A participant’s account also vests in full upon his or her termination due to death, disability or retirement after attaining age 65. Upon retirement or other termination of employment with the Company, the participant may elect a distribution of the vested portion of the cash balance account. Any amounts remaining in the Cash Balance Pension Plan will continue to be credited with interest until the account is paid. The normal form of benefit payment for an unmarried participant is a single life annuity and the normal form of benefit payment for a married participant is a 50% joint and survivor annuity. The participant, with spousal consent if applicable, can waive the normal form and elect a single life annuity or a lump sum.

The Excess Cash Balance Plan is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that is intended to provide eligible participants, including each of the NEOs (other than Mr. Richter and Ms. Darino-Gorski), with a portion of their overall benefit that they would accrue under the Cash Balance Pension Plan but for Code limits on the amount of “compensation” (as defined in the Cash Balance Pension Plan) that can be taken into account in determining benefits under tax-qualified plans. The Excess Cash Balance Pension Plan was frozen to future benefit accruals effective as of December 31, 2015.

The Company maintains a notional excess cash balance account for each eligible participant, and for

each calendar year, credits these accounts with the portion of the allocation that could not be made on his or her behalf under the Cash Balance Pension Plan due to the compensation limitation. In addition, the Company credits each notional excess cash balance account monthly with interest at the same rate used under the Cash Balance Pension Plan. A participant vests in the excess cash balance account according to the same schedule in the Cash Balance Pension Plan. The excess cash balance account, to the extent vested, is paid in a lump sum to the participant as soon as practicable following his or her retirement or other termination of employment with the Company.

The Retirement Plan is a tax-qualified defined benefit plan covering substantially all of our non-union full-time and eligible part-time employees, including Ms. Darino-Gorski, who were hired prior to January 1, 2001. Effective as of January 1, 2001, membership in the plan was frozen and benefit accruals under the plan continued only for employees who were already active participants in the plan as of December 31, 2000. As of December 31, 2007, the plan was amended to freeze all benefit accruals effective January 1, 2008 and eliminate the ability of participants to earn benefits for future service under this plan. As discussed above, the Retirement Plan was merged into the Cash Balance Pension Plan,

effective March 1, 2011. This merger did not adversely impact any participant in either of the two plans.

The plan provides a benefit at retirement equal to (i) 2% of a participant’s final average pay (as defined in the plan) multiplied by years of benefit service up to 20 years; plus (ii) 1% of the participant’s final average pay multiplied by years of benefit service (as defined in the plan) in excess of 20 years; minus (iii) 1.25% of the participant’s Social Security benefit multiplied by total benefit service up to 40 years. Final average pay is based on the highest average compensation paid during 60 consecutive months out

of the last 120 months of benefit service. Compensation means the basic cash remuneration paid to the participant, including annual incentive compensation, commissions and overtime pay, and before deductions for elective deferrals (up to applicable Code limits).

As a result of plan participants’ benefits under the plan being frozen on January 1, 2008, any pay earned and service completed after that date will not be taken into account when determining the amount of a participant’s benefit under the plan. Participants will continue to earn eligibility towards early retirement as long as they remain our employees. Normal retirement under the plan is age 65; however,

participants who have attained age 55 and completed at least ten years of vesting service may retire prior to age 65 and receive a reduced benefit.

The normal form of benefit is a single life annuity for an unmarried participant and a 50% joint and survivor annuity for a married participant. The participant, with the spouse’s consent if married, may waive the normal form and elect an optional form of payment, including a single life annuity, a 50%, 75% or 100% joint and survivor annuity, a ten-year certain and life annuity, a level income option that integrates with Social Security benefits, and a lump sum payment if the actuarial present value of the benefit does not exceed $10,000.

Under the Savings Plan, a tax-qualified retirement savings plan, participating employees, including the NEOs (other than Messrs. Dolan and Burian, each of whom participates through MSG), may contribute into their plan accounts a percentage of their eligible pay on a before-tax basis as well as a percentage of their eligible pay on an after-tax basis. Prior to January 1, 2016, the participants had been eligible to receive a matching contribution from the Company of up to 50% of the first 6% of eligible pay contributed by participating employees. Effective January 1, 2016,

the Savings Plan was amended to provide (a) a matching contribution equal to 100% of the first 4% of eligible pay contributed by participating employees and (b) a discretionary non-elective contribution by the Company. In February 2017, the Company made a discretionary non-elective contribution to each eligible employee’s account equal to 2% of eligible pay with respect to the 2016 calendar year. In connection with the MSG Distribution, the Savings Plan became a multiple employer plan sponsored by MSG, to which we contribute.

The Excess Savings Plan is an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan that operates in conjunction with the Company’s tax-qualified Savings Plan. An employee is eligible to participate in the Excess Plan for a calendar year if his or her compensation (as defined in the Savings Plan) in the preceding year exceeded (or would have exceeded, if the employee had been employed for the entire year) the IRS limit on the amount of compensation that can be taken into account in determining contributions under tax-qualified retirement plans ($270,000 in calendar year 2017) and he or she makes an election to participate prior to the beginning of the year. An eligible employee whose contributions to the Savings Plan are limited as a result of this compensation limit or as a result of reaching the maximum 401(k) deferral limit ($18,000, or $24,000 if 50 or over, for calendar year 2017) can continue to make pre-tax

contributions under the Excess Savings Plan of up to

6% of his or her eligible pay. In addition, the Company will make matching contributions of up to 50% of the first 6% of eligible pay contributed by the employee. A participant is always fully vested in his or her own contributions and vests in the Company matching contributions on the third anniversary of the date of hire (subject to full vesting upon his or her death, disability or retirement after attaining age 65). Account balances under the Excess Savings Plan are credited monthly with the rate of return earned by the Stable Value Fund offered as an investment alternative under the Savings Plan. Distributions of vested benefits are made in a lump sum as soon as practicable after the participant’s termination of employment with the Company. Effective January 1, 2016, the Excess Savings Plan was amended to provide (a) a matching contribution equal to 100% of the first 4% of eligible pay contributed by participating employees and (b) a discretionary non-

elective contribution by the Company. In February 2017, the Company made a discretionary non-elective contribution to each eligible employee’s account

equal to 2% of eligible pay with respect to the 2016 calendar year.

The table below shows (i) the contributions made by each NEO and the Company during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, (ii) aggregate earnings on each NEO’s account balance during the fiscal year ended

June 30, 2017 and (iii) the account balance of each of our NEOs under the Excess Savings Plan as of June 30, 2017.

Each of our NEOs had an employment agreement with the Company in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. On September 16, 2016, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Dolan, effective July 1, 2016. Set forth below is a description of the employment agreements between the Company and each of Mr. Dolan, Ms. Greenberg, Messrs. Richter and Burian, and Ms. Darino-Gorski.

As noted above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, each of Messrs. Dolan and Burian also serves as an executive officer and employee of MSG. Such MSG employment arrangements are pursuant to employment arrangements between MSG and each of Messrs. Dolan and Burian, as applicable (which are not described herein). For a description of each of these employment agreements, see MSG’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed with the SEC on October 27, 2017.

On September 16, 2016, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with James L. Dolan, effective as of July 1, 2016, which provides for Mr. Dolan’s continued employment as the Executive Chairman of the Company.

The employment agreement with the Company provides for an annual base salary of not less than $1,000,000. Mr. Dolan is eligible to participate in the Company’s discretionary annual bonus program with an annual target bonus opportunity equal to not less than 200% of his base salary. Mr. Dolan is eligible,

subject to his continued employment by the Company, to participate in such long-term incentive programs that are made available in the future to similarly situated executives at the Company. It is expected that such awards will consist of annual grants of stock option awards with a grant date fair value of not less than $4,800,000. Subject to applicable plan limitations, 50% of the stock option awards will vest in three equal tranches on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date and the remaining 50% will be subject to the performance criteria applicable to the awards to other executives of the Company under the Company’s long-term incentive programs, and the stock options will expire not later than seven years and six months after the date of grant. Mr. Dolan generally is not eligible for our standard benefits program while he is employed by MSG; provided that Mr. Dolan will continue to be eligible to participate in the Excess Savings Plan and his full Company base salary will be used to determine Mr. Dolan’s benefits under that plan.

If, on or prior to December 31, 2019, Mr. Dolan’s employment is either involuntarily terminated by the Company for any reason other than “cause” (as defined in the agreement), or is terminated by Mr. Dolan for “good reason” (as defined in the agreement) and cause does not then exist (a “Qualifying Termination”), then, subject to Mr. Dolan’s execution of a separation agreement, the Company will provide him with the following benefits and rights: (a) a severance payment in an amount determined at the discretion of the Company, but in no event less than two times the sum of Mr. Dolan’s annual base salary and annual target bonus; provided that Mr. Dolan will not be entitled to such cash severance payment if Mr. Dolan remains employed by MSG at the time his employment with the Company is terminated, in which case the Company will pay the amount of such severance payment to MSG, (b) any

unpaid annual bonus for the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which such termination occurred and a prorated annual bonus for the fiscal year in which such termination occurred, (c) each of Mr. Dolan’s outstanding unvested long-term cash awards will immediately vest in full and will be payable to Mr. Dolan to the same extent that other similarly situated active executives receive payment, (d) all of the time-based restrictions on each of Mr. Dolan’s outstanding unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units (including restricted stock units subject to performance criteria) will immediately be eliminated and such restricted stock and restricted stock units will be payable or deliverable to Mr. Dolan subject to satisfaction of any applicable performance criteria, and (e) each of Mr. Dolan’s outstanding unvested stock options and stock appreciation awards will immediately vest.

If Mr. Dolan’s employment is terminated due to his death or disability, or if after December 31, 2019 there is a Qualifying Termination, then, subject to execution of a separation agreement (other than in the case of death), he or his estate or beneficiary will be provided with the benefits and rights set forth in clauses (c), (d) and (e) above.

The employment agreement contains certain covenants by Mr. Dolan, including a noncompetition agreement that restricts Mr. Dolan’s ability to engage in competitive activities until the first anniversary of a termination of his employment with the Company. The agreement also recognizes that Mr. Dolan will be employed by MSG during his employment with the Company and states that certain actions and circumstances arising from or relating to such dual employment will not be deemed to be a breach of his obligations under the employment agreement or to constitute cause.

On September 11, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Andrea Greenberg, which provides for Ms. Greenberg’s employment as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective as of the MSG Distribution Date.

The employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of not less than $750,000. Ms. Greenberg is eligible to participate in the Company’s

discretionary annual cash incentive program with an annual target bonus equal to not less than 100% of her annual base salary. Ms. Greenberg will also continue to participate in future long-term incentive programs that are made available to similarly situated executives of the Company, subject to Ms. Greenberg’s continued employment by the Company. Commencing with the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2015, and each fiscal year

thereafter, it is expected that Ms. Greenberg will receive one or more long-term awards with an aggregate target value of not less than $1,500,000.

In connection with the MSG Distribution, Ms. Greenberg received a one-time grant of restricted stock units with an aggregate grant date value equal to $1,500,000. This grant vests ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the MSG Distribution Date, subject to Ms. Greenberg’s continued employment and the achievement of performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee. Under the agreement, Ms. Greenberg continues to be eligible to participate in the Company’s standard benefits program, subject to meeting the relevant eligibility requirements, payment of required premiums, and the terms of the plans.

If, on or prior to the third anniversary of the MSG Distribution Date, Ms. Greenberg’s employment with the Company is terminated (i) by the Company other than for “cause” (as defined in the agreement), or (ii) by Ms. Greenberg for “good reason” (as defined in the agreement) and cause does not then exist, then, subject to Ms. Greenberg’s execution of a separation agreement with the Company, the Company will provide her with the following benefits and rights: (a) a severance payment in an amount determined at

the discretion of the Company, but in no event less than two times the sum of Ms. Greenberg’s annual base salary and annual target bonus; (b) any unpaid annual bonus for the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which such termination occurred and a prorated annual bonus for the fiscal year in which such termination occurred; (c) each of Ms. Greenberg’s outstanding long-term cash awards will immediately vest in full and will be payable to Ms. Greenberg to the same extent that other similarly situated active executives receive payment; (d) all of the time-based restrictions on each of Ms. Greenberg’s outstanding restricted stock or restricted stock units granted to her under the plans of the Company will immediately be eliminated and will be payable or deliverable to Ms. Greenberg subject to satisfaction of any applicable performance criteria; and (e) each of Ms. Greenberg’s outstanding stock options and stock appreciation awards under the plans of the Company will immediately vest.

The employment agreement contains certain covenants by Ms. Greenberg including a noncompetition agreement that restricts Ms. Greenberg’s ability to engage in competitive activities until the first anniversary of a termination of her employment with the Company.

On September 11, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Bret Richter, which provides for Mr. Richter’s employment as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective as of the MSG Distribution Date.

The employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of not less than $634,000. Mr. Richter will be eligible to participate in the Company’s discretionary annual cash incentive program with an annual target bonus equal to not less than 75% of his annual base salary. Mr. Richter will also participate in future long-term incentive programs that are made available to similarly situated executives of the Company. Commencing with the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2015, and each fiscal year thereafter, it is expected that Mr. Richter will receive one or more long-term awards with an aggregate target value of not less than $750,000.

In connection with the MSG Distribution, Mr. Richter received a one-time grant of restricted stock units with an aggregate grant date value equal to $1,000,000. This grant vests ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the MSG Distribution Date, subject to Mr. Richter’s continued employment and the achievement of performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee. Under the agreement, Mr. Richter will be eligible to participate in the Company’s standard benefits program, subject to meeting the relevant eligibility requirements, payment of required premiums, and the terms of the plans.

If, prior to the third anniversary of the MSG Distribution Date, Mr. Richter’s employment with the Company is terminated (i) by the Company other than for “cause” (as defined in the agreement), or (ii) by Mr. Richter for “good reason” (as defined in the agreement) and cause does not then exist, then, subject to Mr. Richter’s execution of a separation agreement with the Company, the Company will

provide him with the following benefits and rights: (a) a severance payment in an amount determined at the discretion of the Company, but in no event less than two times the sum of Mr. Richter’s annual base salary and annual target bonus and (b) any unpaid annual bonus for the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which such termination occurred and a prorated annual bonus for the fiscal year in which such termination occurred.

The employment agreement contains certain covenants by Mr. Richter including a noncompetition agreement that restricts his ability to engage in competitive activities until the first anniversary of a termination of his employment with the Company; provided that the noncompetition covenant will not apply following a termination of Mr. Richter’s employment by the Company other than for cause or by Mr. Richter for good reason if he waives his entitlement to the severance benefits described above.

On September 11, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Lawrence J. Burian, effective as of the MSG Distribution Date.

The employment agreement with the Company provides for Mr. Burian’s continued employment as the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company. The employment agreement provides for a minimum annual base salary of not less than $300,000 and a discretionary annual bonus with a target value equal to not less than 150% of Mr. Burian’s annual base salary. Mr. Burian will also participate in future long-term incentive programs that are made available to similarly situated executives of the Company, subject to Mr. Burian’s continued employment by the Company. It is expected that Mr. Burian will receive one or more long-term awards with an aggregate target value of not less than $450,000. Mr. Burian will be eligible to participate in the Company’s standard benefits program, subject to meeting the relevant eligibility requirements, payment of required premiums, and the terms of the plans.