UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-20584
ABIOMED, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 04-2743260 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
22 CHERRY HILL DRIVE
DANVERS, MASSACHUSETTS 01923
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(978) 646-1400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is, a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of July 30, 2010, there were 37,799,064 shares outstanding of the registrants Common Stock, $.01 par value.
ABIOMED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION: | ||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | 3 | ||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and March 31, 2010 | 3 | |||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) | 6 | |||
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 13 | ||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 20 | ||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 20 | ||
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | ||||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 21 | ||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 21 | ||
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 21 | ||
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 21 | ||
Item 4. | (Removed and Reserved) | 21 | ||
Item 5. | Other Information | 21 | ||
Item 6. | Exhibits | 22 | ||
SIGNATURES | 23 |
ABIOMED and ABIOCOR are trademarks of ABIOMED, Inc., and are registered in the United States and certain foreign countries. BVS is a trademark of ABIOMED, Inc. and is registered in the United States. AB5000 is a trademark of ABIOMED, Inc. IMPELLA and RECOVER are trademarks of Abiomed Europe GmbH, a subsidiary of ABIOMED, Inc., and are registered in the United States and certain foreign countries.
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
ABIOMED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3,941 | $ | 4,788 | ||||
Short-term marketable securities |
50,978 | 53,477 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
12,571 | 13,516 | ||||||
Inventories |
7,388 | 9,211 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,344 | 1,676 | ||||||
Total current assets |
76,222 | 82,668 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
6,115 | 6,753 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
2,389 | 2,979 | ||||||
Goodwill |
33,725 | 37,170 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 118,451 | $ | 129,570 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,274 | $ | 3,764 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
10,232 | 13,011 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
1,339 | 1,289 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
15,845 | 18,064 | ||||||
Long-term deferred tax liability |
3,282 | 3,040 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
561 | 510 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
19,688 | 21,614 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Class B Preferred Stock, $.01 par value |
| | ||||||
Authorized - 1,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding - none |
||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value |
378 | 375 | ||||||
Authorized - 100,000,000 shares; Issued - 37,843,643 shares at June 30, 2010 and 37,484,018 shares at March 31, 2010; |
||||||||
Outstanding - 37,792,689 shares at June 30, 2010 and 37,433,064 shares at March 31, 2010 |
||||||||
Additional paid-in-capital |
373,887 | 372,425 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(268,995 | ) | (263,015 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock at cost - 50,954 at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 |
(827 | ) | (827 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(5,680 | ) | (1,002 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
98,763 | 107,956 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 118,451 | $ | 129,570 | ||||
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
3
ABIOMED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||
Products |
$ | 21,761 | $ | 19,588 | ||||
Funded research and development |
241 | 325 | ||||||
22,002 | 19,913 | |||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of product revenue excluding amortization of intangibles |
5,284 | 5,072 | ||||||
Research and development |
6,653 | 5,983 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
15,753 | 15,967 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
367 | 354 | ||||||
28,057 | 27,376 | |||||||
Loss from operations |
(6,055 | ) | (7,463 | ) | ||||
Other income: |
||||||||
Investment (expense) income, net |
(2 | ) | 44 | |||||
Gain on sale of WorldHeart stock |
239 | | ||||||
Other income (expense), net |
81 | (115 | ) | |||||
318 | (71 | ) | ||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(5,737 | ) | (7,534 | ) | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
243 | 226 | ||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,980 | ) | $ | (7,760 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
$ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.21 | ) | ||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
37,086 | 36,549 |
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
4
ABIOMED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Three months ended June 30, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,980 | ) | $ | (7,760 | ) | ||
Adjustments required to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
959 | 1,445 | ||||||
Bad debt expense (recovery) |
53 | (26 | ) | |||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,371 | 1,700 | ||||||
Write-down of inventory |
623 | 566 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |
5 | | ||||||
Deferred tax provision |
243 | 226 | ||||||
Gain on sale of WorldHeart common stock |
(239 | ) | | |||||
Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities |
| (181 | ) | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities source (use): |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
767 | 1,417 | ||||||
Inventories |
645 | (654 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
292 | (152 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
705 | (322 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses |
(2,169 | ) | (902 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
78 | (19 | ) | |||||
Net cash used for operating activities |
(2,647 | ) | (4,662 | ) | ||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of short-term marketable securities |
(1,501 | ) | (362 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of short-term marketable securities |
4,000 | 7,440 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of WorldHeart common stock |
239 | | ||||||
Contingent milestone payment on acquisition |
| (1,756 | ) | |||||
Expenditures for property and equipment |
(289 | ) | (682 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
2,449 | 4,640 | ||||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
94 | 92 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
94 | 92 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(743 | ) | 116 | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(847 | ) | 186 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
4,788 | 1,785 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 3,941 | $ | 1,971 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures: |
||||||||
Common shares issued for business acquisition |
$ | | $ | 3,827 | ||||
Fixed asset additions included in accounts payable |
31 | 81 |
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
5
ABIOMED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
1. Nature of Business and Basis of Preparation
Abiomed, Inc. (the Company or Abiomed) is a leading provider of medical devices in circulatory support and offers a continuum of care in heart recovery for acute heart failure patients. The Companys products are designed to enable the heart to rest, heal and recover by improving blood flow and/or performing the pumping function of the heart. The Companys products are used in the cardiac catheterization lab (cath lab) by interventional cardiologists and/or in the heart surgery suite by heart surgeons for patients who are in need of hemodynamic support prophelactically during high risk angioplasty procedures or who are in pre- shock, shock or profound cardiogenic shock.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for interim financial reporting and in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 that has been filed with the Securities Exchange Commission, or SEC.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for any interim period may not be indicative of results for the full fiscal year.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Goodwill
The Company assesses the realizability of goodwill annually, at October 31, as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. These events or circumstances generally include operating losses or a significant decline in earnings associated with the acquired business or asset. The Companys ability to realize the value of the goodwill will depend on the future cash flows of the business. If the Company is not able to realize the value of goodwill, the Company may be required to incur material charges relating to the impairment of those assets. The Company completed its annual review of goodwill as of October 31, 2009 and determined that no write-down for impairment was necessary.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when evidence of an arrangement exists, title has passed (generally upon shipment) or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue from product sales to new customers is deferred until training on the use of the products has occurred. All costs related to product shipment are recognized at time of shipment. The Company does not provide for rights of return to customers on product sales.
Maintenance and service support contract revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the service contracts based upon the elapsed term of the service contract. In limited instances, the Company also rents its console medical devices on a month-to-month basis or for a longer specified period of time to customers for which revenue is recognized as earned.
Government-sponsored research and development contracts and grants generally provide for payment on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis. Revenues from these contracts and grants are recognized as work is performed, provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work. Under contracts in which the Company spends significantly more on the development project during the term of the contract than the total contract amount, the Company prospectively recognizes revenue on such contracts ratably over the term of the contract as related research and development costs are incurred.
Stock-Based Compensation
All stock-based expense, including grants of employee stock options and restricted stock awards, are based on the grant-date fair value of the awards, adjusted for expected forfeitures. The fair value of stock option grants is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Use of the valuation model requires management to make certain assumptions with respect to selected model inputs. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for a term consistent with the expected life of the stock options. Volatility assumptions are calculated based on historical volatility of the Companys stock. The calculation of the fair value of the options is net of estimated forfeitures. The expected term of options represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.
6
Management estimates the average expected life based on historical experience of the Companys option exercises. Forfeitures are estimated based on an analysis of actual option forfeitures, adjusted to the extent historical forfeitures may not be indicative of forfeitures in the future. In addition, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the option valuation model because the Company does not pay dividends and does not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
The estimated fair value of all awards is recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period. Accruals of compensation cost for an award with a performance condition is based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions. The cumulative effects of changes in the probability outcomes are recorded in the period in which the changes occur.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU No. 2009-13). ASU No. 2009-13. This amended guidance requires an entity to allocate revenue to each unit of accounting in multiple deliverable arrangements based on the relative selling price of each deliverable. It also changes the level of evidence required to separate deliverables by requiring an entity to make its best estimate of the stand-alone selling price of the deliverables with more objective evidence if the selling price is not available. Previously the Company was required to have objective evidence of the undelivered items in order to have separate units of accounting for multiple element arrangements. This new approach is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, which for the Company means no later than April 1, 2011. Early adoption is permitted; however, adoption of this guidance as of a date other than April 1, 2011, will require the Company to apply this guidance retrospectively effective as of April 1, 2010 and will require disclosure of the effect of this guidance as applied to all previously reported interim periods in the fiscal year of adoption. The potential impact of this amended guidance on the Companys financial statements is being evaluated.
Note 3. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments whose value is based on quoted market prices such as exchange-traded instruments and listed equities.
Level 2 includes financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including time value, yield curve, volatility factors, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
Level 3 is comprised of unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flows or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
At June 30, 2010, the Companys marketable securities are invested in U.S. Treasury securities. The Company records these marketable securities at fair value and has classified all of its investments as Level 1 since quoted market prices in active markets are readily available.
7
Note 4. Marketable Securities
The Company has marketable securities at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 that consist of and are classified on the balance sheet as follows:
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gains |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | |||||||||
(in $000s) | ||||||||||||
At June 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||
US Treasury Securities |
$ | 50,977 | $ | | | $ | 50,977 | |||||
Accrued Interest |
1 | | | 1 | ||||||||
$ | 50,978 | | $ | | $ | 50,978 | ||||||
At March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||
US Treasury securities |
$ | 53,476 | $ | | $ | | $ | 53,476 | ||||
Accrued interest |
1 | | | 1 | ||||||||
$ | 53,477 | | $ | | $ | 53,477 | ||||||
Note 5. Inventories
The components of inventories are as follows:
June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | |||||
(in $000s) | ||||||
Raw materials and supplies |
$ | 1,973 | $ | 2,759 | ||
Work-in-progress |
1,708 | 3,344 | ||||
Finished goods |
3,707 | 3,108 | ||||
$ | 7,388 | $ | 9,211 | |||
All of the Companys inventories relate to circulatory care product lines that include the Impella, AB5000, BVS 5000, iPulse, Portable Driver and AbioCor product platforms. Finished goods and work-in-process inventories consist of direct material, labor and overhead. During each of the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded $0.6 million in write downs of inventory, including excess quantities and obsolescence.
From time to time, the Company loans finished goods inventory on a short-term basis to customers for demonstration purposes and this inventory is generally amortized over a one to five year life. The Company had $0.9 million and $1.1 million in demo inventory at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively. Amortization expense related to demo inventory was $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
8
Note 6. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The carrying amount of goodwill at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 was $33.7 million and $37.2 million, respectively, and has been recorded in connection with the Companys acquisition of Impella Cardiosystems AG, or Impella. The goodwill activity for the three months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
(in $000s) | ||||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | 37,170 | ||
Exchange rate impact |
(3,445 | ) | ||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ | 33,725 | ||
The components of intangible assets are as follows:
June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost | Accumulated Amortization |
Net Book Value |
Cost | Accumulated Amortization |
Net Book Value | |||||||||||||
(in $000s) | (in $000s) | |||||||||||||||||
Patents |
$ | 6,192 | $ | 4,589 | $ | 1,603 | $ | 6,790 | $ | 4,792 | $ | 1,998 | ||||||
Trademarks and tradenames |
316 | 227 | 89 | 345 | 236 | 109 | ||||||||||||
Distribution agreements |
598 | 441 | 157 | 659 | 463 | 196 | ||||||||||||
Acquired technology |
2,064 | 1,524 | 540 | 2,272 | 1,596 | 676 | ||||||||||||
$ | 9,170 | $ | 6,781 | $ | 2,389 | $ | 10,066 | $ | 7,087 | $ | 2,979 | |||||||
Amortization of intangible assets was $0.4 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The Companys expected amortization expense will be $1.0 million for the nine months ending March 31, 2011, $1.3 million for fiscal 2012 and $0.1 million for fiscal 2013.
Note 7. Stock-Based Compensation
Total stock-based compensation recognized in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||
(in $000s) | ||||||
Cost of product revenue |
$ | 62 | $ | 117 | ||
Research and development |
310 | 129 | ||||
Selling, general and administrative |
999 | 1,454 | ||||
$ | 1,371 | $ | 1,700 | |||
The $1.4 million in stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 includes $1.0 million related to stock options and $0.4 million related to restricted stock and the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP. Stock compensation related to restricted stock is primarily related to performance share awards, as described in more detail below.
The $1.7 million in stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 includes $1.3 million related to stock options and $0.4 million related to restricted stock and the Companys ESPP.
The remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for unvested stock option awards at June 30, 2010 was approximately $7.4 million, net of forfeitures, and the weighted-average time over which this cost will be recognized is 1.9 years. Benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost are reported as a financing cash flow rather than as an operating cash flow.
9
Stock Option Activity
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the three months ended June 30, 2010:
Options (in thousands) |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years) |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | ||||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
5,557 | $ | 10.56 | 6.62 | |||||||
Granted |
709 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Exercised |
(16 | ) | 5.83 | ||||||||
Cancelled |
(98 | ) | 11.19 | ||||||||
Expired |
(94 | ) | 15.56 | ||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
6,058 | $ | 10.43 | 6.87 | $ | 6,802 | |||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2010 |
3,907 | $ | 10.95 | 5.71 | $ | 3,602 | |||||
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $0.1 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The total fair value of options vested during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $3.5 million and $3.7 million, respectively.
The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option granted at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.17 | % | 2.45 | % | ||
Expected option life (years) |
5.30 | 5.24 | ||||
Expected volatility |
51.0 | % | 54.1 | % |
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for a term consistent with the expected life of the stock options. Volatility assumptions are calculated based on the historical volatility of the Companys stock. The Company estimates the expected term based on historical experience. The expected dividend yield was zero, since the Company does not pay cash dividends and does not expect to pay cash dividends in the future. The calculation of the fair value of the options is net of estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated based on an analysis of actual option forfeitures, adjusted to the extent historic forfeitures may not be indicative of forfeitures in the future.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value for options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $4.73 and $2.89 per share, respectively.
Restricted Stock
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||
Number of Shares (in 000s) |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
Restricted stock awards at March 31, 2010 |
379 | $ | 15.93 | |||
Granted |
356 | 10.00 | ||||
Vested |
(69 | ) | 12.38 | |||
Forfeited |
(13 | ) | 18.63 | |||
Restricted stock awards at June 30, 2010 |
653 | $ | 13.02 | |||
The remaining unrecognized compensation expense for restricted stock awards at June 30, 2010 was approximately $3.2 million and the weighted-average time over which this cost will be recognized is 2.5 years.
10
Performance Based Awards
Included in the stock option and restricted stock activity discussed above are certain awards granted in fiscal years 2011, 2010, and 2009 that contain performance based vesting.
In August 2008, 406,250 shares of restricted common stock and options to purchase 93,750 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and certain members of senior management of the Company, all of which would vest upon achievement of certain sales and profitability performance targets in fiscal years 2009 through 2011. In August 2009, 50,000 additional shares of restricted stock were issued to certain additional executive officers of the Company, which have the same vesting milestones based on fiscal 2010 and 2011 performance targets. In March 2009, the Company met one of the prescribed performance milestones and a portion of these shares and stock options vested.
In March 2010, the Company determined that it did not meet any of the prescribed performance targets for fiscal 2010. Accordingly, 96,563 shares of restricted stock related to these awards were forfeited and 17,812 shares underlying options related to these awards failed to vest. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, the Company determined that it was not probable that it would meet the prescribed performance milestones for fiscal 2011, and as a result the Company is no longer accruing stock-based compensation on these awards.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, 311,000 shares of restricted stock and a performance award for the potential issuance of 45,000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the Company, all of which could vest upon achievement of prescribed performance milestones. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has determined that it is probable it will meet the prescribed performance milestones for both of these awards.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company has recorded $0.1 million in stock-based compensation cost for shares and options in which the prescribed performance milestones have been achieved or are probable of being achieved. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these shares and options at June 30, 2010 is $2.4 million based on the Companys current assessment of probability of achieving the performance milestones.
Note 8. Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to tax benefit carry forwards and to differences between the financial statement amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates. A valuation reserve is established if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company has accumulated a net deferred tax liability in the amount of $3.3 million which is the result of a difference in accounting for the Companys goodwill which is amortized over 15 years for tax purposes, but not amortized for book purposes. The net deferred tax liability cannot be offset against the Companys deferred tax assets since it relates to an indefinite-lived asset and is not anticipated to reverse in the same period.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax, as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981. All open tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions, including the federal government and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. However, since the Company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income, those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized.
Note 9. Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted shares outstanding is calculated by adding to the weighted shares outstanding any potential (unissued) shares of common stock from outstanding stock options and warrants based on the treasury stock method. In periods when a net loss is reported, all common stock equivalents are excluded from the calculation because they would have an anti-dilutive effect, meaning the loss per share would be reduced. Therefore, in periods when a loss is reported basic and dilutive loss per share is the same value.
Excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding are stock options outstanding in the amount of approximately 6,058,000 and 5,659,000 as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and unvested shares of restricted stock in the amount of approximately 653,000 shares and 430,000 shares as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
11
Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
From time to time, the Company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, management presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened, or all of them combined, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, cash flow and results. At June 30, 2010, the Company did not have any pending litigation.
Note 11. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | |||||
(in $000s) | ||||||
Salaries and benefits |
$ | 4,964 | $ | 7,652 | ||
Research and development |
2,575 | 3,081 | ||||
Professional |
463 | 565 | ||||
Warranty |
456 | 482 | ||||
Lease exit |
791 | | ||||
Other |
983 | 1,231 | ||||
$ | 10,232 | $ | 13,011 | |||
In July 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to lease additional manufacturing space in Athlone, Ireland in anticipation of supporting future demand of Impella 2.5. In fiscal 2010 the Company deferred the start up activities at this facility and, as of the three months ended June 30, 2010, moved the equipment from Athlone to Aachen, Germany and Danvers. The Company is in negotiations with the facilitys landlord to sub-lease the facility or terminate the lease early. In the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company fully vacated the Athlone premises and recorded an expense of $0.8 million as an estimate of the cost to terminate the Athlone lease. As of June 30, 2010, there are no remaining fixed assets located in the Companys Athlone facility.
Note 12. Segment and Enterprise Wide Disclosures
The Company operates in one business segmentthe research, development and sale of medical devices to assist or replace the pumping function of the failing heart. The Companys chief operating decision maker (determined to be the Chief Executive Officer) does not manage any part of the Company separately, and the allocation of resources and assessment of performance are based on the Companys consolidated operating results. Approximately 62% and 60% of the Companys total consolidated assets are located within the U.S. as of June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively. Remaining assets are located in Europe, primarily related to the Companys Impella production facility, and include goodwill and intangibles of $33.7 million and $37.2 million at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively, associated with the Impella acquisition from May 2005. Total assets in Europe excluding goodwill and intangibles amounted to 9% of total consolidated assets at each of June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010. For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, international sales accounted for 7% and 9% of total product revenue, respectively.
12
ITEM 2: | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Abiomeds discussion of financial condition and results of operations may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements based upon a number of factors, including uncertainties associated with development, testing and related regulatory approvals, anticipated future losses, complex manufacturing, high quality requirements, dependence on limited sources of supply, competition, market acceptance of our new products, technological change, government regulation, future capital needs and uncertainty of additional financing and other risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. In particular, we encourage you to review the risks and uncertainties discussed under Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended March 31, 2010. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of medical devices in circulatory support and we offer a continuum of care in heart recovery for acute heart failure patients. Our products are designed to enable the heart to rest, heal and recover by improving blood flow and/or performing the pumping function of the heart. Our products are used in the cardiac catheterization lab, or cath lab, by interventional cardiologists and/or in the heart surgery suite by heart surgeons for patients who are in need of hemodynamic support prophylactically during high risk angioplasty procedures or who are in pre- shock, shock or profound cardiogenic shock. We believe heart recovery is the optimal clinical outcome by restoring the quality of life of patients. In addition, we believe heart recovery is the most cost-effective path for the healthcare system.
Our strategic focus and the driver of the most recent revenue growth in our business is the market penetration of our Impella 2.5 product, which received 510(k) clearance in June 2008. In addition to the 510(k) clearance, we are also conducting clinical trials of our Impella 2.5 for additional indications of use, with the goal of establishing Impella as the standard of care in the cath lab. We have found that the 510(k) clearance of Impella 2.5 has significantly slowed our progress in completing the clinical trials, since our customers are now able to use the Impella 2.5 commercially outside of the clinical trials. We received 510(k) clearance in April 2009 for our Impella 5.0 and Impella LD devices, which are larger and provide more blood flow than the Impella 2.5. We are also currently in clinical trials with our Impella 5.0 and LD devices. Similar to our experience with the Impella 2.5, we expect that the 510(k) clearance of the Impella 5.0 and LD will slow down our efforts to complete clinical trials with these devices.
In order for our manufacturing to meet the expected demand for our Impella 2.5 product, we have been implementing process improvements on the Impella production line at our manufacturing facilities in Aachen, Germany to increase the output that we can produce. In addition to further process improvement programs designed to further increase yield and capacity levels, we plan to incrementally expand manufacturing capacity in Aachen and relocate sub-assembly production to our manufacturing facility in Danvers, Massachusetts. We expect to start production on a second production line for Impella in Aachen during fiscal 2011 and we are developing additional Impella manufacturing capacity in Danvers.
Revenues from our other heart recovery products, largely focused on the heart surgery suite, have been lower recently as we have strategically shifted our sales and marketing efforts towards our Impella products and the cath lab. We have from time to time engaged in console placement programs related to our iPulse consoles, in order to encourage utilization of our BVS and AB5000 disposables. We have also developed a portable driver for our AB5000 product which received FDA approval under a PMA supplement in March 2009. This clearance allows for immediate commercial shipment of the AB5000 portable driver to U.S. hospitals for in hospital and transport use. Our BVS product was launched in 1992 and revenue from this product has been declining as AB5000, our next-generation product for heart recovery, is designed to provide a longer duration of support than the BVS 5000 and, when used with the portable driver, facilitates patient mobility in the hospital. We expect revenue from BVS to continue to decline as our customers transition to AB5000 disposables and our new Impella 5.0 and LD products geared for the surgery suite. We expect revenues from our non-Impella business during fiscal 2011 will continue to decrease as we continue to focus on our Impella products. In addition, we do not expect that revenues from sales of our replacement heart product, the AbioCor, will be a material portion of our total revenues for the foreseeable future as our primary strategic focus is centered on heart recovery for acute heart failure patients. We have not recognized any revenue from the sales of AbioCor since fiscal 2008.
13
We have incurred net losses since our inception, including a net loss of $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. We expect to incur additional net losses in the future as we continue to expand our commercial infrastructure and invest in clinical trials and research and development expenses related to our products.
Impella 2.5
The Impella 2.5 catheter is a percutaneous micro heart pump with an integrated motor and sensors. The device is designed primarily for use by interventional cardiologists to support patients in the cath lab who may require assistance to maintain their circulation. The Impella 2.5 device received 510(k) clearance from the U.S Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, in June 2008 for partial circulatory support for up to six hours, has CE mark approval in Europe for up to five days of use and is approved for use in over 40 countries.
The Impella 2.5 catheter can be quickly inserted via the femoral artery to reach the left ventricle of the heart where it is directly deployed to draw blood out of the ventricle, deliver it to the systemic system and perfuse the heart muscle. This function is intended to reduce ventricular work (resting the heart) and provide flow to vital organs. The Impella 2.5 is introduced with normal interventional cardiology procedures and can pump up to 2.5 liters of blood per minute.
In August 2007, we received approval from the FDA to begin a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, or PCI, pivotal clinical trial, known as the Protect II study, for the Impella 2.5. The pivotal study will determine the safety and effectiveness of the Impella 2.5 as compared to optimal medical management with an intra-aortic balloon, or IAB, during high-risk angioplasty procedures. The study inclusion criteria have been extended to include patients with triple vessel disease with low ejection fraction. The study is approved under category B2 status and the trial sites are eligible for full reimbursement from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS. The randomized pivotal study, in which 654 patients at up to 150 hospitals will undergo a high-risk PCI procedure, is comprised of two arms comparing nearly equal number of Impella 2.5 supported patients and IAB supported patients during the procedure. Patients receiving the Impella 2.5 can be supported for up to five days as a left ventricular assist device, or VAD. As of June 30, 2010, a total of 390 patients were enrolled in the Protect II study, or 60% of the 654 patients required. Based on current trial enrollment rates, we expect to complete the Protect II study in 2012.
In March 2008, we received approval from the FDA to begin a second pivotal study for our Impella 2.5 in the U.S. under an investigational device exemption, or IDE, for hemodynamically unstable patients undergoing a PCI procedure due to acute myocardial infarction, or AMI, commonly referred to as heart attack. The AMI study, known as Recover II, was to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Impella 2.5 as a left ventricular assist device for heart attack patients as compared to optimal medical management with an IAB. In September 2009, we suspended further administrative progress towards new site activation on the Recover II study while exploring changes in the study design. Because Recover II is a pivotal trial conducted under IDE, any changes in the study design need to be approved by the FDA.
14
The clinical trial experience to date with our Impella 2.5 has been favorable, including our completed U.S. safety pilot clinical trial. Factors that affect the length of time to complete the pivotal studies in the U.S. study include the timing of each center receiving IRB approval, the timing of the training we provide each center, and the rate of patient enrollment.
Impella 5.0 and Impella LD
The Impella 5.0 catheter and Impella LD are percutaneous micro heart pumps with integrated motors and sensors for use primarily in the heart surgery suite. These devices are designed to support patients who require higher levels of circulatory support as compared to the Impella 2.5. The Impella 5.0 and Impella LD devices received 510(k) clearance in April 2009, for circulatory support for up to six hours and have CE mark approval in Europe and are approved for use in over 40 countries.
The Impella 5.0 is implanted via a small incision in the femoral artery in the groin and can be quickly inserted via the femoral artery using a guide wire to reach the left ventricle of the heart where it is directly deployed to draw blood out of the ventricle, deliver it to the systemic system and perfuse the heart muscle. This function is intended to reduce ventricular work (resting the heart). The Impella LD is similar to the Impella 5.0 but is implanted directly through an incision in the subclavien or through an aortic graft. The Impella 5.0 and Impella LD can pump up to five liters of blood per minute and have been used to treat patients in need of cardiac support resulting from post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock, myocarditis, low cardiac output after a heart attack, or post-coronary intervention procedures.
AB5000 and BVS 5000
We manufacture and sell the AB5000 Circulatory Support System and the BVS 5000 Biventricular Support System for the temporary support of acute heart failure patients in profound shock, including patients suffering from cardiogenic shock after a heart attack, post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock, or myocarditis. We believe the AB5000 and BVS 5000 systems are the only commercially available cardiac assist devices that are approved by the FDA for all indications where heart recovery is the intended outcome, including patients who have undergone successful cardiac surgery and subsequently develop low cardiac output, or patients who suffer from acute cardiac disorders leading to hemodynamic instability.
We have developed a Portable Circulatory Support Driver for both in-hospital and out-of-hospital patients. The Portable Driver is designed to support our AB5000 VAD. We received CE mark approval for our Portable Driver in March 2008. In May 2008, we received conditional approval for the Portable Driver under an IDE to conduct a U.S. patient discharge study at 20 hospitals for 30 patients. In March 2009, we received FDA approval of our PMA supplement for the AB Portable Driver. This clearance allows for immediate commercial shipment of the device to U.S. hospitals for in hospital and transport use. Out-of-hospital use is being studied in a clinical trial, which, when successfully completed, would allow patients to go home while waiting for recovery.
AbioCor
Our AbioCor Implantable Replacement Heart is the first completely self-contained artificial heart. Designed to sustain the bodys circulation, the AbioCor is intended for end-stage biventricular heart failure patients whose other treatment options have been exhausted. Patients with advanced age, impaired organ function or cancer are generally ineligible for a heart transplant and are potential candidates to receive the AbioCor implantable heart. Once implanted, the AbioCor system does not penetrate the skin, reducing the chance of infection. This technology provides patients with mobility and remote diagnostics. The use of AbioCor is limited to normal to larger sized male patients and has a product life expectancy of 18-24 months.
We received a Humanitarian Device Exemption, or HDE, supplement approval from the FDA for product enhancement of the AbioCor in January 2008. HDE approval signifies that no comparable alternative therapy exists for patients facing imminent death without the technology. HDE approval allows the AbioCor to be made available to a limited patient population, with no more than 4,000 patients receiving the technology in the U.S. each year under HDE approval limits. Because the AbioCor is only available to a limited patient population, we do not expect that demand will meet the 4,000 patient limit under HDE approval. As a result, we have no current plans to seek a broader regulatory approval of the AbioCor. We do not expect that revenues from sales of the AbioCor will be a material portion of our total revenues for the foreseeable future as our primary strategic focus is centered on heart recovery for acute heart failure patients. We have not recognized any revenue from sales of the AbioCor since fiscal 2008.
15
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of operations data for the periods indicated as a percentage of total revenues (which includes revenues from products and funded research and development) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||
Revenues: |
||||||
Products |
98.9 | % | 98.4 | % | ||
Funded research and development |
1.1 | 1.6 | ||||
100.0 | 100.0 | |||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||
Cost of product revenue excluding amortization of intangibles |
24.0 | 25.5 | ||||
Research and development |
30.2 | 30.0 | ||||
Selling, general and administrative |
71.6 | 80.2 | ||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
1.7 | 1.8 | ||||
127.5 | 137.5 | |||||
Loss from operations |
(27.5 | ) | (37.5 | ) | ||
Other income: |
||||||
Investment (expense) income, net |
(0.1 | ) | 0.2 | |||
Gain on sale of WorldHeart stock |
1.1 | | ||||
Other income (expense), net |
0.4 | (0.6 | ) | |||
1.4 | (0.4 | ) | ||||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(26.1 | ) | (37.9 | ) | ||
Provision for income taxes |
1.1 | 1.1 | ||||
Net loss |
(27.2 | )% | (39.0 | )% | ||
Three months ended June 30, 2010 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009
Revenues
Our revenues are comprised of the following:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||
(in $000s) | ||||||
Impella |
$ | 16,631 | $ | 12,027 | ||
Other |
5,130 | 7,561 | ||||
Total product revenues |
$ | 21,761 | $ | 19,588 | ||
Funded research and development |
241 | 325 | ||||
Total revenues |
$ | 22,002 | $ | 19,913 | ||
Impella revenue encompasses our Impella 2.5, Impella 5.0, and Impella LD platforms. Our revenue from other products include AB5000, BVS5000, IAB, iPulse, Portable Driver, AbioCor and cannulae and related service agreements.
Total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $2.1 million, or 11%, to $22.0 million from $19.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in total revenue was primarily due to higher Impella orders due to greater demand in the U.S. Increases of Impella revenues were partially offset by a decline in other revenue, primarily BVS and AB5000.
Impella revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $4.6 million, or 38% to $16.6 million from $12.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Most of our Impella revenue was from disposable product sales of Impella in the U.S., primarily as a result of sales occurring after our 510(k) clearance of Impella 2.5 in June 2008 and Impella 5.0 and LD in April 2009, as we focus on increasing utilization of these products through continued sales force and physician training.
Other product revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased by $2.5 million or 33%, to $5.1 million from $7.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in other revenue was due to a decline in BVS and AB5000 disposable revenue as well as a decrease in console revenue supporting these product lines. We expect that BVS and
16
AB5000 revenue will continue to decline in fiscal 2011 as we focus our sales efforts in the surgical suite on Impella 5.0 and LD.
Cost of Product Revenues
Cost of product revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $0.2 million, or 4%, to $5.3 million from $5.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This was due to shipments of higher volumes of Impella products during the three months ended June 30, 2010. Gross margin was 76% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 75% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to a larger portion of revenues from disposable products and a smaller number of Impella and iPulse console placements.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $0.7 million, or 12%, to $6.7 million from $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 included $2.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively, in clinical trial expenses primarily associated with our Impella 2.5 U.S. trials. The increase in clinical trial expenditures was due to Impella costs in managing our Protect II study.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased slightly by $0.2 million, or 1%, to $15.8 million from $16.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was mainly due to lower expenses in Europe as we focus more of our commercial efforts in the U.S. This decrease was partially offset by an expense of $0.8 million as an estimate of the cost to terminate the Athlone lease in the three months ended June 30, 2010.
We expect to increase our expenditures on sales and marketing activities in fiscal 2011, with particular investments in clinical personnel with cath lab expertise. We also plan to increase our marketing, service, and training investments to support the efforts of the sales and field clinical teams to drive recovery awareness for acute heart failure patients.
Amortization of Intangibles
Amortization of intangible assets was $0.4 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Amortization expense primarily is related specifically to intangible assets acquired in the Impella acquisition.
Investment Expense and Income, net
Investment expense, net, was $2,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, representing a decrease of $46,000 from investment income, net, of $44,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Gain on Sale of WorldHeart Stock
In December 2007, we invested $5.0 million in WorldHeart, a developer of an implantable mechanical circulatory support system for chronic heart failure patients. We recorded an impairment charge of $5.0 million in fiscal 2008, reducing the carrying value of the investment to zero. In July 2008, the note receivable and warrant were converted into common stock of WorldHeart. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we sold 100,000 shares of WorldHeart common stock, which resulted in a gain of $0.2 million.
Other Income (Expense), net
The changes in other income (expense), net are mainly due to the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on our operations.
Provision for Income Taxes
For each of the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded an income tax provision of $0.2 million. The income tax provision is primarily due to deferred tax related to our goodwill, which is amortizable over 15 years for tax purposes but not amortized for book purposes. The net deferred tax liability cannot be offset against our deferred tax assets since it relates to an indefinite-lived asset and is not anticipated to reverse in the same period.
17
Net Loss
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred a net loss of $6.0 million, or $0.16 per share, compared to a net loss of $7.8 million, or $0.21 per share, for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in the net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009 was due to increased Impella sales during the three months ended June 30, 2010 due to greater demand in the U.S.
We expect to continue to incur net losses through at least fiscal 2011 as we plan to invest in expanding our global distribution to support revenue growth, continue our Impella pivotal studies, and invest in research and development in an effort to bring new products to market.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2010, our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term marketable securities totaled $54.9 million, a decrease of $3.4 million compared to $58.3 million at March 31, 2010. We believe that our revenue from product sales together with existing resources will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months.
Marketable securities at June 30, 2010 consists of $51.0 million held in funds that invest solely in U.S. Treasury securities. We are not a party to any interest rate swaps, currency hedges or derivative contracts of any type and have no exposure to commercial paper or auction rate securities markets. We continue to monitor our cash position closely with recent economic events and only invest excess cash in short term U.S. treasury securities.
We will continue to closely monitor our liquidity and the overall health of the credit markets. However, we cannot predict with any certainty the impact on us of any further disruption in the credit environment. Our primary liquidity needs are to fund the expansion of our commercial infrastructure in the U.S., increase our Impella manufacturing capacity, fund new product development, and general working capital needs. Through June 30, 2010, we have funded our operations principally from product revenue and through the sale of equity securities, including our August 2008 stock offering in which we received proceeds of $42.0 million. We also generate funds from product sales and funded research and development revenue.
Our operating activities during the three months ended June 30, 2010 used cash of $2.6 million as compared to $4.7 million during the same period in the prior year. Our net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2010 of $6.0 million was the primary cause of our cash used for operations. Also contributing to our cash used for operations was a $1.5 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses primarily due to the payment of annual employee bonuses in the first quarter. These decreases in cash were partially offset by non-cash adjustments of $1.4 million related to stock-based compensation expense, $1.0 million of depreciation and amortization, a write down of inventory of $0.6 million, and a decrease in accounts receivable of $0.8 million.
Our investing activities during the three months ended June 30, 2010 generated cash of $2.4 million as compared to $4.6 million during the same period in the prior year. Cash provided by investment activities for the three months ended June 30, 2010 consisted primarily of $2.5 million of proceeds from the sale of short-term marketable securities, net of purchases, during the quarter. We also incurred $0.3 million of cash expenditures for property and equipment primarily for the purchase of manufacturing equipment and computer software. We also received $0.2 million in proceeds from the sale of WorldHeart stock during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Our financing activities during each of the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 provided cash of $0.1 million. Cash provided by financing activities during the three months ended June 30, 2010 were attributable to the exercise of stock options.
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 are estimated to be $2.0 to $2.5 million, which relate primarily to our planned manufacturing capacity increases for Impella and software development projects.
In July 2008, we entered into an agreement to lease additional manufacturing space in Athlone, Ireland in anticipation of supporting future demand of Impella 2.5. In fiscal 2010 we deferred the start up activities at this facility and, as of the three months ended June 30, 2010, moved the equipment from Athlone to Aachen, Germany and Danvers. We are in negotiations with our landlord to sub-lease the facility or terminate the lease early. In the three months ended June 30, 2010, we fully vacated the Athlone premises and recorded an expense of $0.8 million as an estimate of the cost to terminate the Athlone lease. As of June 30, 2010, we have no remaining fixed assets located in our Athlone facility.
Our liquidity is influenced by our ability to sell our products in a competitive industry and our customers ability to pay for our products. Factors that may affect liquidity include our ability to penetrate the market for our products, maintain or
18
reduce the length of the selling cycle, and collect cash from clients after our products are sold. Exclusive of activities involving any future acquisitions of products or companies that complement or augment our existing line of products, we believe that current available funds and cash generated from operations will provide sufficient liquidity to meet operating requirements for the foreseeable future. We believe that our existing cash balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our projected capital expenditures, working capital, and other cash requirements at least through the next 12 months. We continue to review our long-term cash needs on a regular basis. We have no debt outstanding.
Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when evidence of an arrangement exists, title has passed (generally upon shipment) or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue from product sales to new customers is deferred until all elements of the sale have been delivered. All costs related to product shipment are recognized at time of shipment. Customers do not have a right of return on our product sales.
Maintenance and service support contract revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the service contracts based upon the elapsed term of the service contract. In limited instances, we rent console medical devices on a month-to-month basis or for a longer specified period of time to customers for which revenue is recognized as earned.
Government-sponsored research and development contracts and grants generally provide for payment on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis. Revenues from these contracts and grants are recognized as work is performed. Under contracts in which we elect to spend significantly more on the development project during the term of the contract than the total contract amount, we prospectively recognize revenue on such contracts ratably over the term of the contract as related research and development costs are incurred.
Stock-Based Compensation
The fair value of each stock option we grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Use of a valuation model requires us to make certain assumptions with respect to selected model inputs. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for a term consistent with the expected life of the stock options. Volatility assumptions are calculated based on historical volatility of our stock. The calculation of the fair value of the options is net of estimated forfeitures. The expected term of options represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. We estimate the average expected life based on historical experience of our option exercises. Forfeitures are estimated based on an analysis of actual option forfeitures, adjusted to the extent historical forfeitures may not be indicative of forfeitures in the future. In addition, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the option valuation model because we do not pay dividends and do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
The estimated fair value of all awards is recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period. Accruals of compensation cost for an award with a performance condition is based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions. The cumulative effects of changes in the probability outcomes are recorded in the period in which the changes occur.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU No. 2009-13). ASU No. 2009-13. This amended guidance requires an entity to allocate revenue to each unit of accounting in multiple deliverable arrangements based on the relative selling price of each deliverable. It also changes the level of evidence required to separate deliverables by requiring an entity to make its best estimate of the stand-alone selling price of the deliverables with more objective evidence if the selling price is not available. Previously the Company was required to have objective evidence of the undelivered items in order to have separate units of accounting for multiple element arrangements. This new approach is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, which for us means no later than April 1, 2011. Early adoption is permitted; however, adoption of this guidance as of a date other than April 1, 2011, will require us to apply this guidance retrospectively effective as of April 1, 2010 and will require disclosure of the effect of this guidance as applied to all previously reported interim periods in the fiscal year of adoption. The potential impact of this amended guidance on our financial statements is being evaluated.
19
ITEM 3: | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Primary Market Risk Exposures
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. Our cash, short-term marketable securities, and long-term marketable securities are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10 percent from levels at June 30, 2010, we believe the decline in fair market value of our investment portfolio would be immaterial. Marketable securities at June 30, 2010 consist of $51.0 million in five funds that invest in U.S. Treasury securities and related interest.
Currency Exchange Rates
Our foreign subsidiaries functional currency is the Euro. Therefore, our investment in our foreign subsidiaries is sensitive to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. The effect of a change in currency exchange rates on our net investment in international subsidiaries is reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of stockholders equity. Had a 10% depreciation in foreign currencies occurred relative to the U.S. dollar as of June 30, 2010, the result would have been a reduction of stockholders equity of approximately $3.8 million.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
At June 30, 2010, our financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term marketable securities, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. The estimated fair values of the financial instruments have been determined by us using available market information and appropriate valuation techniques. Considerable judgment is required, however, to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), as of June 30, 2010. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed by us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Evaluation of Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the first quarter of our fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
20
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
We are from time to time involved in various legal actions, the outcomes of which are not within our complete control and may not be known for prolonged periods of time. In some actions, the claimants seek damages, as well as other relief, which, if granted, would require significant expenditures. We record a liability in our consolidated financial statements for these actions when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We review these estimates each accounting period as additional information is known and adjust the loss provision when appropriate. If the loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated, a liability is not recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. To the best of our knowledge, as of the date of this report there has been no material change in any of the risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
Item 4. | (Removed and Reserved) |
Item 5. | Other Information |
None
21
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Exhibit No. |
Description |
Filed with This Form 10-Q |
Incorporated by Reference | |||||||
Form | Filing Date | Exhibit No. | ||||||||
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation. | S-3 | September 29, 1997 | 3.1 | ||||||
3.2 | Restated By-Laws, as amended. | 10-K | May 27, 2004 | 3.2 | ||||||
3.3 | Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock. | S-3 | September 29, 1997 | 3.3 | ||||||
3.4 | Amendment to the Companys Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of common stock from 25,000,000 to 100,000,000. | 8-K | March 21, 2007 | 3.4 | ||||||
4.1 | Specimen Certificate of common stock. | S-1 | June 5, 1987 | 4.1 | ||||||
11.1 | Statement regarding computation of Per Share Earnings (see Note 11, Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). | X | ||||||||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of principal executive officer. | X | ||||||||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of principal accounting officer. | X | ||||||||
32.1 | Section 1350 certification. | X |
22
ABIOMED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Abiomed, Inc. | ||||||
Date: August 5, 2010 | /S/ ROBERT L. BOWEN | |||||
Robert L. Bowen | ||||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
23