UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
T QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2015.
OR
£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File Number: 0-26176
DISH Network Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada |
|
88-0336997 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
9601 South Meridian Boulevard |
|
|
Englewood, Colorado |
|
80112 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
(303) 723-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No x
As of April 30, 2015, the registrants outstanding common stock consisted of 224,363,507 shares of Class A common stock and 238,435,208 shares of Class B common stock.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
i | |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (Unaudited) |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 | |
|
|
|
|
3 | |
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
4 |
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
45 | |
|
|
|
61 | ||
|
|
|
62 | ||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
62 | ||
|
|
|
62 | ||
|
|
|
62 | ||
|
|
|
Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
Mine Safety Disclosures |
None |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
Other Information |
None |
|
|
|
63 | ||
|
|
|
|
64 |
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, in particular, statements about our plans, objectives and strategies, growth opportunities in our industries and businesses, our expectations regarding future results, financial condition, liquidity and capital requirements, our estimates regarding the impact of regulatory developments and legal proceedings, and other trends and projections. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts and may be identified by words such as future, anticipate, intend, plan, goal, seek, believe, estimate, expect, predict, will, would, could, can, may, and similar terms. These forward-looking statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and represent managements current views and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, events or results and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control. Accordingly, actual performance, events or results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:
Competition and Economic Risks Affecting our Business
· We face intense and increasing competition from satellite television providers, cable companies and telecommunications companies, especially as the pay-TV industry has matured, which may require us to further increase subscriber acquisition and retention spending or accept lower subscriber activations and higher subscriber churn.
· Competition from digital media companies that provide or facilitate the delivery of video content via the Internet may reduce our gross new subscriber activations and may cause our subscribers to purchase fewer services from us or to cancel our services altogether, resulting in less revenue to us.
· Economic weakness and uncertainty may adversely affect our ability to grow or maintain our business.
· Our competitors may be able to leverage their relationships with programmers to reduce their programming costs and offer exclusive content that will place them at a competitive advantage to us.
· As a new service offering, our over-the-top or OTT Internet-based services face certain risks, including, among others, significant competition.
· We face increasing competition from other distributors of unique programming services such as foreign language and sports programming that may limit our ability to maintain subscribers that desire these unique programming services.
Operational and Service Delivery Risks Affecting our Business
· If we do not continue improving our operational performance and customer satisfaction, our gross new subscriber activations may decrease and our subscriber churn may increase.
· If our gross new subscriber activations decrease, or if our subscriber churn, subscriber acquisition costs or retention costs increase, our financial performance will be adversely affected.
· Programming expenses are increasing and could adversely affect our future financial condition and results of operations.
· We depend on others to provide the programming that we offer to our subscribers and, if we lose access to this programming, our gross new subscriber activations may decline and our subscriber churn may increase.
· We may not be able to obtain necessary retransmission consent agreements at acceptable rates, or at all, from local network stations.
· We may be required to make substantial additional investments to maintain competitive programming offerings.
· Any failure or inadequacy of our information technology infrastructure and communications systems could disrupt or harm our business.
· We currently depend on EchoStar Corporation and its subsidiaries, or EchoStar, to design, develop and manufacture substantially all of our new set-top boxes and certain related components, to provide the vast majority of our transponder capacity, to provide digital broadcast operations and other services to us, and to provide the IPTV streaming technology for our OTT services. Our business would be adversely affected if EchoStar ceases to provide these products and services to us and we are unable to obtain suitable replacement products and services from third parties.
· We operate in an extremely competitive environment and our success may depend in part on our timely introduction and implementation of, and effective investment in, new competitive products and services, the failure of which could negatively impact our business.
· Technology in our industry changes rapidly and our inability to offer new subscribers and upgrade existing subscribers with more advanced equipment could cause our products and services to become obsolete.
· We rely on a single vendor or a limited number of vendors to provide certain key products or services to us such as information technology support, billing systems, and security access devices, and the inability of these key vendors to meet our needs could have a material adverse effect on our business.
· Our primary supplier of new set-top boxes, EchoStar, relies on a few suppliers and in some cases a single supplier, for many components of our new set-top boxes, and any reduction or interruption in supplies or significant increase in the price of supplies could have a negative impact on our business.
· Our programming signals are subject to theft, and we are vulnerable to other forms of fraud that could require us to make significant expenditures to remedy.
· We depend on third parties to solicit orders for our services that represent a significant percentage of our total gross new subscriber activations.
· We have limited satellite capacity and failures or reduced capacity could adversely affect our business.
· Our owned and leased satellites are subject to construction, launch, operational and environmental risks that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites.
· We generally do not carry commercial insurance for any of the in-orbit satellites that we use, other than certain satellites leased from third parties, and could face significant impairment charges if any of our owned satellites fail.
· We may have potential conflicts of interest with EchoStar due to our common ownership and management.
· We rely on key personnel and the loss of their services may negatively affect our businesses.
Acquisition and Capital Structure Risks Affecting our Business
· We have made substantial investments to acquire certain wireless spectrum licenses and other related assets. In addition, we have made substantial non-controlling investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities related to the AWS-3 Auction.
· To the extent that we commercialize our wireless spectrum licenses, we will face certain risks entering and competing in the wireless services industry and operating a wireless services business.
· We face certain risks related to our non-controlling investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
· We may pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions to complement or expand our businesses that may not be successful and we may lose up to the entire value of our investment in these acquisitions and transactions.
· We may need additional capital, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all, to continue investing in our businesses and to finance acquisitions and other strategic transactions.
· From time to time a portion of our investment portfolio may be invested in securities that have limited liquidity and may not be immediately accessible to support our financing needs, including investments in public companies that are highly speculative and have experienced and continue to experience volatility.
· We have substantial debt outstanding and may incur additional debt.
· It may be difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so may be beneficial to our shareholders, because of our ownership structure.
· We are controlled by one principal stockholder who is also our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Legal and Regulatory Risks Affecting our Business
· Our business depends on certain intellectual property rights and on not infringing the intellectual property rights of others.
· We are party to various lawsuits which, if adversely decided, could have a significant adverse impact on our business, particularly lawsuits regarding intellectual property.
· Our ability to distribute video content via the Internet, including our OTT services, involves regulatory risk.
· Changes in the Cable Act of 1992 (Cable Act), and/or the rules of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that implement the Cable Act, may limit our ability to access programming from cable-affiliated programmers at nondiscriminatory rates.
· The injunction against our retransmission of distant networks, which is currently waived, may be reinstated.
· We are subject to significant regulatory oversight, and changes in applicable regulatory requirements, including any adoption or modification of laws or regulations relating to the Internet, could adversely affect our business.
· Our business depends on FCC licenses that can expire or be revoked or modified and applications for FCC licenses that may not be granted.
· We are subject to digital high-definition (HD) carry-one, carry-all requirements that cause capacity constraints.
· Our business, investor confidence in our financial results and stock price may be adversely affected if our internal controls are not effective.
· We may face other risks described from time to time in periodic and current reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
Other factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed under the caption Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 10-K) filed with the SEC, those discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations herein and in the 10-K and those discussed in other documents we file with the SEC. All cautionary statements made or referred to herein should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. Investors should consider the risks and uncertainties described or referred to herein and should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made, and we expressly disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
Unless otherwise required by the context, in this report, the words DISH Network, the Company, we, our and us refer to DISH Network Corporation and its subsidiaries, EchoStar refers to EchoStar Corporation and its subsidiaries, and DISH DBS refers to DISH DBS Corporation and its subsidiaries, a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of DISH Network.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
As of |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,049,897 |
|
$ |
7,104,496 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
349,146 |
|
2,131,745 |
| ||
Trade accounts receivable - other, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $15,895 and $23,603, respectively |
|
887,670 |
|
920,103 |
| ||
Trade accounts receivable - EchoStar, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of zero |
|
40,841 |
|
31,390 |
| ||
Inventory |
|
484,747 |
|
493,754 |
| ||
Deferred tax assets |
|
25,667 |
|
25,667 |
| ||
Derivative financial instruments (Note 2) |
|
451,071 |
|
383,460 |
| ||
FCC auction deposits |
|
9,995,567 |
|
1,320,000 |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
128,994 |
|
167,119 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
13,413,600 |
|
12,577,734 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Noncurrent Assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
|
86,984 |
|
86,984 |
| ||
Property and equipment, net |
|
3,786,400 |
|
3,773,539 |
| ||
FCC authorizations |
|
4,968,171 |
|
4,968,171 |
| ||
Other investment securities |
|
327,250 |
|
327,250 |
| ||
Other noncurrent assets, net |
|
342,800 |
|
337,530 |
| ||
Total noncurrent assets |
|
9,511,605 |
|
9,493,474 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
22,925,205 |
|
$ |
22,071,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity (Deficit) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Trade accounts payable - other |
|
$ |
198,434 |
|
$ |
165,324 |
|
Trade accounts payable - EchoStar |
|
270,168 |
|
251,669 |
| ||
Deferred revenue and other |
|
917,144 |
|
891,373 |
| ||
Accrued programming |
|
1,500,079 |
|
1,376,130 |
| ||
Accrued interest |
|
217,166 |
|
227,158 |
| ||
Other accrued expenses |
|
639,497 |
|
519,404 |
| ||
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
2,182,175 |
|
681,467 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
5,924,663 |
|
4,112,525 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-Term Obligations, Net of Current Portion: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
12,240,749 |
|
13,746,059 |
| ||
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
1,938,598 |
|
1,882,711 |
| ||
Long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities |
|
283,977 |
|
276,281 |
| ||
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion |
|
14,463,324 |
|
15,905,051 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
20,387,987 |
|
20,017,576 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests (Note 2) |
|
248,837 |
|
41,498 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stockholders Equity (Deficit): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Class A common stock, $.01 par value, 1,600,000,000 shares authorized, 280,004,955 and 279,406,646 shares issued, 223,886,695 and 223,288,386 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
2,800 |
|
2,794 |
| ||
Class B common stock, $.01 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, 238,435,208 shares issued and outstanding |
|
2,384 |
|
2,384 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
2,700,376 |
|
2,678,791 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
79,031 |
|
174,507 |
| ||
Accumulated earnings (deficit) |
|
1,075,477 |
|
723,992 |
| ||
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
(1,569,459 |
) |
(1,569,459 |
) | ||
Total DISH Network stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
2,290,609 |
|
2,013,009 |
| ||
Noncontrolling interests |
|
(2,228 |
) |
(875 |
) | ||
Total stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
2,288,381 |
|
2,012,134 |
| ||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
$ |
22,925,205 |
|
$ |
22,071,208 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Subscriber-related revenue |
|
$ |
3,688,920 |
|
$ |
3,556,187 |
|
Equipment sales and other revenue |
|
22,467 |
|
22,239 |
| ||
Equipment sales, services and other revenue - EchoStar |
|
12,841 |
|
15,772 |
| ||
Total revenue |
|
3,724,228 |
|
3,594,198 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Costs and Expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below - Note 8): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Subscriber-related expenses |
|
2,162,766 |
|
2,069,132 |
| ||
Satellite and transmission expenses |
|
186,840 |
|
149,496 |
| ||
Cost of sales - equipment, services and other |
|
39,448 |
|
27,793 |
| ||
Subscriber acquisition costs: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of sales - subscriber promotion subsidies |
|
52,925 |
|
62,875 |
| ||
Other subscriber acquisition costs |
|
208,573 |
|
252,464 |
| ||
Subscriber acquisition advertising |
|
135,421 |
|
133,807 |
| ||
Total subscriber acquisition costs |
|
396,919 |
|
449,146 |
| ||
General and administrative expenses |
|
208,180 |
|
203,113 |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization (Note 8) |
|
246,212 |
|
249,220 |
| ||
Total costs and expenses |
|
3,240,365 |
|
3,147,900 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating income (loss) |
|
483,863 |
|
446,298 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest income |
|
8,494 |
|
14,164 |
| ||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
(156,313 |
) |
(175,994 |
) | ||
Other, net |
|
120,289 |
|
(5,189 |
) | ||
Total other income (expense) |
|
(27,530 |
) |
(167,019 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
456,333 |
|
279,279 |
| ||
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
|
(103,081 |
) |
(108,462 |
) | ||
Net income (loss) |
|
353,252 |
|
170,817 |
| ||
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
|
1,767 |
|
(5,114 |
) | ||
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network |
|
$ |
351,485 |
|
$ |
175,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
462,090 |
|
458,422 |
| ||
Diluted |
|
464,046 |
|
461,361 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings per share - Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to DISH Network |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to DISH Network |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Comprehensive Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
353,252 |
|
$ |
170,817 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
3,878 |
| ||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
7,422 |
|
9,983 |
| ||
Recognition of previously unrealized (gains) losses on available-for-sale securities included in net income (loss) |
|
(59,487 |
) |
493 |
| ||
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit, net |
|
(43,411 |
) |
(3,829 |
) | ||
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
(95,476 |
) |
10,525 |
| ||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
257,776 |
|
181,342 |
| ||
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
|
1,767 |
|
(5,114 |
) | ||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to DISH Network |
|
$ |
256,009 |
|
$ |
186,456 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
353,252 |
|
$ |
170,817 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
246,212 |
|
249,220 |
| ||
Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on investments |
|
(127,024 |
) |
1,521 |
| ||
Non-cash, stock-based compensation |
|
7,709 |
|
9,863 |
| ||
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |
|
12,477 |
|
25,088 |
| ||
Other, net |
|
20,753 |
|
39,709 |
| ||
Changes in current assets and current liabilities, net |
|
378,218 |
|
187,687 |
| ||
Net cash flows from operating activities from continuing operations |
|
891,597 |
|
683,905 |
| ||
Net cash flows from operating activities from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
(30,007 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchases of marketable investment securities |
|
(13,507 |
) |
(1,290,940 |
) | ||
Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities |
|
1,802,460 |
|
1,575,374 |
| ||
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
(274,260 |
) |
(300,845 |
) | ||
H Block FCC license deposit (Note 10) |
|
|
|
(1,235,866 |
) | ||
AWS-3 FCC license deposits (Note 10) |
|
(9,075,567 |
) |
|
| ||
AWS-3 FCC deposit refund (Note 10) |
|
400,000 |
|
|
| ||
Other, net |
|
3,282 |
|
36,832 |
| ||
Net cash flows from investing activities from continuing operations |
|
(7,157,592 |
) |
(1,215,445 |
) | ||
Net cash flows from investing activities from discontinued operations, net, including $0 and $0 of purchases of property and equipment, respectively |
|
|
|
20,847 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
(7,116 |
) |
(7,724 |
) | ||
Capital contributions from Northstar Manager and SNR Management (Note 10) |
|
204,200 |
|
|
| ||
Net proceeds from Class A common stock options exercised and stock issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
6,345 |
|
6,014 |
| ||
Other, net |
|
7,967 |
|
1,915 |
| ||
Net cash flows from financing activities from continuing operations |
|
211,396 |
|
205 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations |
|
(6,054,599 |
) |
(531,335 |
) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period from continuing operations |
|
7,104,496 |
|
4,700,022 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1,049,897 |
|
$ |
4,168,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(9,160 |
) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
9,160 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Organization and Business Activities
Principal Business
DISH Network Corporation is a holding company. Its subsidiaries (which together with DISH Network Corporation are referred to as DISH Network, the Company, we, us and/or our, unless otherwise required by the context) operate two primary business segments.
· DISH. The DISH® branded pay-TV service (DISH) had 13.844 million subscribers in the United States as of March 31, 2015. The DISH branded pay-TV service consists of, among other things, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses authorizing us to use direct broadcast satellite (DBS) and Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) spectrum, our owned and leased satellites, receiver systems, third-party broadcast operations, customer service facilities, a leased fiber optic network, in-home service and call center operations, and certain other assets utilized in our operations. In addition, we market broadband services under the dishNET brand, which had 0.591 million subscribers in the United States as of March 31, 2015. Our satellite broadband service utilizes advanced technology and high-powered satellites launched by Hughes Communications, Inc. (Hughes) and ViaSat, Inc. (ViaSat) to provide broadband coverage nationwide. This service primarily targets rural residents that are underserved, or unserved, by wireline broadband. In addition to the dishNET branded satellite broadband service, we also offer wireline voice and broadband services under the dishNET brand as a competitive local exchange carrier to consumers living in a 14-state region in the western United States. We primarily bundle our dishNET branded services with our DISH branded pay-TV service.
· Wireless
· DISH Spectrum. We have invested over $5.0 billion since 2008 to acquire certain wireless spectrum licenses and related assets. These wireless spectrum licenses are subject to certain interim and final build-out requirements. As we review our options for the commercialization of our wireless spectrum, we may incur significant additional expenses and may have to make significant investments related to, among other things, research and development, wireless testing and wireless network infrastructure, as well as the acquisition of additional wireless spectrum.
· AWS-3 Auction. On February 13, 2015, Northstar Wireless, LLC (Northstar Wireless) and SNR Wireless LicenseCo, LLC (SNR Wireless) each filed applications with the FCC to acquire certain AWS-3 wireless spectrum licenses (the AWS-3 Licenses) that were made available in the auction designated by the FCC as Auction 97 (the AWS-3 Auction) for which it was named as winning bidder and had made the required down payments. Issuance of any AWS-3 Licenses to Northstar Wireless (the Northstar Licenses) or SNR Wireless (the SNR Licenses) depends, among other things, upon the FCCs review and approval of the applications filed by Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless. We cannot predict the timing or the outcome of the FCCs review of those applications. We own an 85% non-controlling interest in each of Northstar Spectrum, LLC (Northstar Spectrum) and SNR Wireless Holdco, LLC (SNR Holdco), the parent companies of Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless, respectively. After Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless made the final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, respectively, our total non-controlling equity and debt investments in these entities and their parent companies, respectively, were approximately $9.778 billion. Under the applicable accounting guidance in Accounting Standards Codification 810, Consolidation (ASC 810), Northstar Spectrum and SNR Holdco are considered variable interest entities and, based on the characteristics of the structure of these entities and in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, we have consolidated these entities into our financial statements beginning in the fourth quarter 2014. See Note 2 for further discussion.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
In the event that the FCC grants the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, we may need to make significant additional loans to Northstar Spectrum and Northstar Wireless (collectively, the Northstar Entities) and to SNR Holdco and SNR Wireless (collectively, the SNR Entities), or they may need to partner with others, so that the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities may commercialize, build-out and integrate the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, and comply with regulations applicable to the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses. Depending upon the nature and scope of such commercialization, build-out, integration efforts, and regulatory compliance, any such loans or partnerships could vary significantly. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain a profitable return on our non-controlling investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities.
See Note 10 for further discussion.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information. Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements prepared under GAAP. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Our results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Principles of Consolidation
We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries, investments in entities in which we have controlling influence and variable interest entities where we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary. Minority interests are recorded as noncontrolling interests or redeemable noncontrolling interests. See below for further discussion. Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee. When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Northstar Wireless. Northstar Wireless is a wholly owned subsidiary of Northstar Spectrum, which is an entity owned by Northstar Manager, LLC (Northstar Manager) and us. Under the applicable accounting guidance in ASC 810, Northstar Spectrum is considered a variable interest entity and, based on the characteristics of the structure of this entity and in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, we have consolidated Northstar Spectrum into our financial statements beginning in the fourth quarter 2014. After the five-year anniversary of the grant of the Northstar Licenses, Northstar Manager has the ability, but not the obligation, to require Northstar Spectrum to purchase Northstar Managers ownership interests in Northstar Spectrum (the Northstar Put Right) for a purchase price that equals its equity contribution to Northstar Spectrum plus a fixed annual rate of return. In the event that the Northstar Put Right is exercised by Northstar Manager, the consummation of the sale will be subject to FCC approval. Northstar Spectrum does not have a call right with respect to Northstar Managers ownership interests in Northstar Spectrum. Although Northstar Manager is the sole manager of Northstar Spectrum, Northstar Managers ownership interest is considered temporary equity under the applicable accounting guidance and is thus recorded as part of Redeemable noncontrolling interest in the mezzanine section of our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Northstar Managers
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
ownership interest in Northstar Spectrum was initially accounted for at fair value. Subsequently, Northstar Managers ownership interest in Northstar Spectrum is increased by the fixed annual rate of return through Redeemable noncontrolling interest in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the offset recorded in Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The operating results of Northstar Spectrum attributable to Northstar Manager are recorded as Redeemable noncontrolling interest in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the offset recorded in Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). See Note 10 for further discussion on Northstar Wireless and the AWS-3 Auction.
SNR Wireless. SNR Wireless is a wholly owned subsidiary of SNR Holdco, which is an entity owned by SNR Wireless Management, LLC (SNR Management) and us. Under the applicable accounting guidance in ASC 810, SNR Holdco is considered a variable interest entity and, based on the characteristics of the structure of this entity and in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, we have consolidated SNR Holdco into our financial statements beginning in the fourth quarter 2014. After the five-year anniversary of the grant of the SNR Licenses, SNR Management has the ability, but not the obligation, to require SNR Holdco to purchase SNR Managements ownership interests in SNR Holdco (the SNR Put Right) for a purchase price that equals its equity contribution to SNR Holdco plus a fixed annual rate of return. In the event that the SNR Put Right is exercised by SNR Management, the consummation of the sale will be subject to FCC approval. SNR Holdco does not have a call right with respect to SNR Managements ownership interests in SNR Holdco. Although SNR Management is the sole manager of SNR Holdco, SNR Managements ownership interest is considered temporary equity under the applicable accounting guidance and is thus recorded as part of Redeemable noncontrolling interest in the mezzanine section of our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. SNR Managements ownership interest in SNR Holdco was initially accounted for at fair value. Subsequently, SNR Managements ownership interest in SNR Holdco is increased by the fixed annual rate of return through Redeemable noncontrolling interest in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the offset recorded in Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax on our Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The operating results of SNR Holdco attributable to SNR Management are recorded as Redeemable noncontrolling interest in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the offset recorded in Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). See Note 10 for further discussion on SNR Wireless and the AWS-3 Auction.
Discontinued Operations
On April 26, 2011, we completed the acquisition of most of the assets of Blockbuster, Inc. As of December 31, 2013, Blockbuster had ceased material operations. The results of Blockbuster are presented for all periods as discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated financial statements. On January 14, 2014, we completed the sale of our Blockbuster operations in Mexico.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense for each reporting period. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things, allowances for doubtful accounts, self-insurance obligations, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair value of financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, fair value of multi-element arrangements, capital leases, asset impairments, estimates of future cash flows used to evaluate impairments, useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, retailer incentives, programming expenses and subscriber lives. Economic conditions may increase the inherent uncertainty in the estimates and assumptions indicated above. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
differences may be material to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively in the period they occur.
Fair Value Measurements
We determine fair value based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Market or observable inputs are the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. We apply the following hierarchy in determining fair value:
· Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;
· Level 2, defined as observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and derivative financial instruments indexed to marketable investment securities; and
· Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other participants therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available.
As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts) and current liabilities (excluding the Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations) is equal to or approximates fair value due to their short-term nature or proximity to current market rates. See Note 6 for the fair value of our marketable investment securities and derivative financial instruments.
Fair values for our publicly traded debt securities are based on quoted market prices, when available. The fair values of private debt are estimated based on an analysis in which we evaluate market conditions, related securities, various public and private offerings, and other publicly available information. In performing this analysis, we make various assumptions regarding, among other things, credit spreads, and the impact of these factors on the value of the debt securities. See Note 9 for the fair value of our long-term debt.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We may purchase and hold derivative financial instruments for, among other reasons, strategic or speculative purposes. We record all derivative financial instruments on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value as either assets or liabilities. Changes in the fair values of derivative financial instruments are recognized in our results of operations and included in Other, net within Other Income (Expense) on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). We currently have not designated any derivative financial instrument for hedge accounting.
As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we held derivative financial instruments indexed to the trading price of common equity securities with a fair value of $451 million and $383 million, respectively. The fair value of the derivative financial instruments is dependent on the trading price of the indexed common equity securities, which may be volatile and vary depending on, among other things, the issuers financial and operational performance and market conditions.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
New Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue from Contracts with Customers. On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This converged standard on revenue recognition was issued jointly with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). ASU 2014-09 provides a framework for revenue recognition that replaces most existing GAAP revenue recognition guidance when it becomes effective. ASU 2014-09 will become effective for us on January 1, 2017, and allows for either a full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption. However, the FASB has proposed a potential one year deferral on the effective date for implementation of this standard. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected an adoption method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.
3. Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share
We present both basic earnings per share (EPS) and diluted EPS. Basic EPS excludes potential dilution and is computed by dividing Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock awards were exercised. The potential dilution from stock awards was computed using the treasury stock method based on the average market value of our Class A common stock. The following table presents EPS amounts for all periods and the basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding used in the calculation.
|
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| ||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
353,252 |
|
$ |
170,817 |
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
1,767 |
|
(5,114 |
) | ||
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network |
|
$ |
351,485 |
|
$ |
175,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
462,090 |
|
458,422 |
| ||
Dilutive impact of stock awards outstanding |
|
1,956 |
|
2,939 |
| ||
Diluted |
|
464,046 |
|
461,361 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings per share - Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to DISH Network |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to DISH Network |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, there were stock awards to acquire 0.4 million and 0.1 million shares, respectively, of Class A common stock outstanding, not included in the weighted-average common shares outstanding above, as their effect is anti-dilutive.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
Vesting of options and rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock granted pursuant to our performance based stock incentive plans (Restricted Performance Units) is contingent upon meeting certain goals, some of which are not yet probable of being achieved. As a consequence, the following are also not included in the diluted EPS calculation.
|
|
As of March 31, |
| ||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||
Performance based options (1) |
|
4,018 |
|
7,766 |
|
Restricted Performance Units (1) |
|
1,394 |
|
1,866 |
|
Total (1) |
|
5,412 |
|
9,632 |
|
(1) The decrease in performance based options and Restricted Performance Units primarily resulted from the expiration of the 2005 LTIP.
4. Supplemental Data Statements of Cash Flows
The following table presents our supplemental cash flow and other non-cash data.
|
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Cash paid for interest (including capitalized interest) |
|
$ |
230,382 |
|
$ |
230,312 |
|
Cash received for interest |
|
11,488 |
|
33,273 |
| ||
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
944 |
|
9,427 |
| ||
Capitalized interest |
|
65,999 |
|
36,281 |
| ||
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Transfer of property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
432,080 |
| ||
Investment in EchoStar and HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method |
|
|
|
316,204 |
| ||
Transfer of liabilities and other |
|
|
|
44,540 |
| ||
Capital distribution to EchoStar, net of deferred taxes of $31,274 |
|
|
|
51,466 |
| ||
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
5. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table presents the tax effect on each component of Other comprehensive income (loss).
|
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Ended March 31, |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Before |
|
Tax |
|
Net |
|
Before |
|
Tax |
|
Net |
| ||||||
|
|
Tax |
|
(Expense) |
|
of Tax |
|
Tax |
|
(Expense) |
|
of Tax |
| ||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Benefit (1) |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Benefit |
|
Amount |
| ||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,878 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,878 |
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
7,422 |
|
(2,744 |
) |
4,678 |
|
9,983 |
|
(3,649 |
) |
6,334 |
| ||||||
Recognition of previously unrealized (gains) losses on available-for-sale securities included in net income (loss) |
|
(59,487 |
) |
(40,667 |
) |
(100,154 |
) |
493 |
|
(180 |
) |
313 |
| ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(52,065 |
) |
$ |
(43,411 |
) |
$ |
(95,476 |
) |
$ |
14,354 |
|
$ |
(3,829 |
) |
$ |
10,525 |
|
(1) Prior to December 31, 2012, we had established a valuation allowance against all deferred tax assets that were capital in nature. At December 31, 2012, it was determined that these deferred tax assets were realizable and the valuation allowance was released, including the valuation allowance related to a specific portfolio of available-for-sale securities for which changes in fair value had historically been recognized as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Under the intra-period tax allocation rules, a credit of $63 million was recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the release of this valuation allowance.
We elected to use the aggregate portfolio method to determine when the $63 million would be released from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to Income tax (provision) benefit, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Under the aggregate portfolio approach, the intra-period tax allocation remaining in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is not released to Income tax (provision) benefit, net until such time that the specific portfolio of available-for-sale securities that generated the original intra-period allocation is liquidated. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, this specific available-for-sale security portfolio was liquidated and the $63 million credit that was previously recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was released to Income tax (provision) benefit, net. This adjustment has no net effect on Net cash flows from operating activities from continuing operations or Total stockholders equity (deficit).
The Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is detailed in the following table, net of tax.
|
|
Unrealized / |
| |
|
|
Recognized |
| |
|
|
Gains |
| |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
(Losses) |
| |
|
|
(In thousands) |
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2014 |
|
$ |
174,507 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification |
|
4,678 |
| |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
(100,154 |
) | |
Balance as of March 31, 2015 |
|
$ |
79,031 |
|
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
6. Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities
Our marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investment securities consisted of the following:
|
|
As of |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Marketable investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current marketable investment securities - strategic |
|
$ |
321,342 |
|
$ |
711,213 |
|
Current marketable investment securities - other |
|
27,804 |
|
1,420,532 |
| ||
Total current marketable investment securities |
|
349,146 |
|
2,131,745 |
| ||
Restricted marketable investment securities (1) |
|
85,617 |
|
76,970 |
| ||
Total marketable investment securities |
|
434,763 |
|
2,208,715 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (1) |
|
1,367 |
|
10,014 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investment in EchoStar preferred tracking stock - cost method |
|
228,795 |
|
228,795 |
| ||
Investment in HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method |
|
87,409 |
|
87,409 |
| ||
Other investment securities - cost method |
|
11,046 |
|
11,046 |
| ||
Total other investment securities |
|
327,250 |
|
327,250 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investment securities |
|
$ |
763,380 |
|
$ |
2,545,979 |
|
(1) Restricted marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents are included in Restricted cash and marketable investment securities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Marketable Investment Securities
Our marketable investment securities portfolio consists of various debt and equity instruments, all of which are classified as available-for-sale, except as specified below.
Current Marketable Investment Securities Strategic
Our current strategic marketable investment securities include strategic and financial debt and equity investments in public companies that are highly speculative and have experienced and continue to experience volatility. As of March 31, 2015, our strategic investment portfolio consisted of securities of a small number of issuers, and as a result the value of that portfolio depends, among other things, on the performance of those issuers. The fair value of certain of the debt and equity securities in our investment portfolio can be adversely impacted by, among other things, the issuers respective performance and ability to obtain any necessary additional financing on acceptable terms, or at all.
Current Marketable Investment Securities - Other
Our current marketable investment securities portfolio includes investments in various debt instruments including, among others, commercial paper, corporate securities and U.S. treasury and agency securities.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
Commercial paper consists mainly of unsecured short-term, promissory notes issued primarily by corporations with maturities ranging up to 365 days. Corporate securities consist of debt instruments issued by corporations with various maturities normally less than 18 months. U. S. Treasury and agency securities consist of debt instruments issued by the federal government and other government agencies.
Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities
As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our restricted marketable investment securities, together with our restricted cash, included amounts required as collateral for our letters of credit.
Other Investment Securities
We have strategic investments in certain debt and equity securities that are included in noncurrent Other investment securities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and accounted for using the cost, equity and/or available-for-sale methods of accounting.
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in securities that are not publicly traded depends on the success of the issuers businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient capital, on acceptable terms or at all, and to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.
Investment in Tracking Stock
To improve our position in the growing consumer satellite broadband market, among other reasons, on February 20, 2014, we entered into agreements with EchoStar Corporation (EchoStar) to implement a transaction pursuant to which, among other things: (i) on March 1, 2014, we transferred to EchoStar and Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation (HSSC), a subsidiary of EchoStar, five satellites (EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI and EchoStar XIV (collectively the Transferred Satellites)), including related in-orbit incentive obligations and cash interest payments of approximately $59 million), and approximately $11 million in cash in exchange for an aggregate of 6,290,499 shares of a series of preferred tracking stock issued by EchoStar and an aggregate of 81.128 shares of a series of preferred tracking stock issued by HSSC (collectively, the Tracking Stock); and (ii) beginning on March 1, 2014, we lease back certain satellite capacity on the Transferred Satellites (collectively, the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction). The Tracking Stock generally tracks the residential retail satellite broadband business of Hughes Network Systems, LLC (HNS), a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSSC, including without limitation the operations, assets and liabilities attributed to the Hughes residential retail satellite broadband business (collectively, the Hughes Retail Group). The shares of the Tracking Stock issued to us represent an aggregate 80% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group.
Since the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction is among entities under common control, we recorded the Tracking Stock at EchoStars and HSSCs historical cost basis for these instruments of $229 million and $87 million, respectively. The difference between the historical cost basis of the Tracking Stock received and the net carrying value of the Transferred Satellites of $356 million (including debt obligations, net of deferred taxes), plus the $11 million in cash, resulted in a $51 million capital transaction recorded in Additional paid-in capital on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Although our investment in the Tracking Stock represents an aggregate 80% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group, we have no operational control or significant influence over the Hughes Retail Group business, and currently there is no public market for the Tracking Stock. As such, the Tracking Stock is accounted for under the cost method of accounting.
On February 20, 2014, DISH Operating L.L.C. (DOLLC) and DISH Network L.L.C. (DNLLC), each indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of us, entered into an Investor Rights Agreement with EchoStar and HSSC with respect
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
to the Tracking Stock (the Investor Rights Agreement). The Investor Rights Agreement provides, among other things, certain information and consultation rights for us; certain transfer restrictions on the Tracking Stock and certain rights and obligations to offer and sell under certain circumstances (including a prohibition on transfers of the Tracking Stock for one year, with continuing transfer restrictions (including a right of first offer in favor of EchoStar) thereafter, an obligation to sell the Tracking Stock to EchoStar in connection with a change of control of us and a right to require EchoStar to repurchase the Tracking Stock in connection with a change of control of EchoStar, in each case subject to certain terms and conditions); certain registration rights; certain obligations to provide conversion and exchange rights of the Tracking Stock under certain circumstances; and certain protective covenants afforded to holders of the Tracking Stock. The Investor Rights Agreement generally will terminate with respect to our interest should we no longer hold any shares of the HSSC-issued Tracking Stock and any registrable securities under the Investor Rights Agreement.
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities
As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had accumulated net unrealized gains of $125 million and $177 million, respectively. These amounts, net of related tax effect, were $79 million and $175 million, respectively. All of these amounts are included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Total stockholders equity (deficit). The components of our available-for-sale investments are summarized in the table below.
|
|
As of March 31, 2015 |
|
As of December 31, 2014 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Marketable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
Investment |
|
Unrealized |
|
Investment |
|
Unrealized |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
Securities |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Net |
|
Securities |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Net |
| |||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities (including restricted): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
U. S. Treasury and agency securities |
|
$ |
62,777 |
|
$ |
92 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
$ |
58,254 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
$ |
(4 |
) | |
Commercial paper |
|
11,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Corporate securities |
|
113,108 |
|
39,965 |
|
(15 |
) |
39,950 |
|
1,496,044 |
|
72,918 |
|
(153 |
) |
72,765 |
| |||||||||
Other |
|
35,241 |
|
83 |
|
(11 |
) |
72 |
|
192,607 |
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
1,293 |
| |||||||||
Equity securities |
|
212,360 |
|
84,499 |
|
|
|
84,499 |
|
393,254 |
|
106,971 |
|
(4,346 |
) |
102,625 |
| |||||||||
Total |
|
$ |
434,763 |
|
$ |
124,639 |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
$ |
124,613 |
|
$ |
2,208,715 |
|
$ |
181,189 |
|
$ |
(4,510 |
) |
$ |
176,679 |
| |
As of March 31, 2015, restricted and non-restricted marketable investment securities included debt securities of $62 million with contractual maturities within one year, $60 million with contractual maturities extending longer than one year through and including five years and $100 million with contractual maturities longer than ten years. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as a result of our ability to sell these securities prior to maturity.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
Marketable Investment Securities in a Loss Position
The following table reflects the length of time that the individual securities, accounted for as available-for-sale, have been in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category. As of March 31, 2015, the unrealized losses related to our investments in debt securities primarily represented investments in corporate securities. We have the ability to hold and do not intend to sell our investments in these debt securities before they recover or mature, and it is more likely than not that we will hold these investments until that time. In addition, we are not aware of any specific factors indicating that the underlying issuers of these debt securities would not be able to pay interest as it becomes due or repay the principal at maturity. Therefore, we believe that these changes in the estimated fair values of these marketable investment securities are related to temporary market fluctuations.
|
|
As of |
| ||||||||||
|
|
March 31, 2015 |
|
December 31, 2014 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
| ||||
|
|
Value |
|
Loss |
|
Value |
|
Loss |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Debt Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Less than 12 months |
|
$ |
2,719 |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
$ |
280,738 |
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
12 months or more |
|
128 |
|
(11 |
) |
135,853 |
|
(59 |
) | ||||
Equity Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
15,338 |
|
(4,346 |
) | ||||
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
2,847 |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
$ |
431,929 |
|
$ |
(4,510 |
) |
Fair Value Measurements
Our investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
|
|
As of |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
March 31, 2015 |
|
December 31, 2014 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| ||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Equivalents (including restricted) |
|
$ |
944,733 |
|
$ |
152,997 |
|
$ |
791,736 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
7,009,897 |
|
$ |
274,123 |
|
$ |
6,735,774 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Debt securities (including restricted): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
U. S. Treasury and agency securities |
|
$ |
62,777 |
|
$ |
47,250 |
|
$ |
15,527 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
58,254 |
|
$ |
42,710 |
|
$ |
15,544 |
|
$ |
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
11,277 |
|
|
|
11,277 |
|
|
|
68,556 |
|
|
|
68,556 |
|
|
| ||||||||
Corporate securities |
|
113,108 |
|
|
|
104,633 |
|
8,475 |
|
1,496,044 |
|
|
|
1,488,340 |
|
7,704 |
| ||||||||
Other |
|
35,241 |
|
|
|
35,031 |
|
210 |
|
192,607 |
|
|
|
58,171 |
|
134,436 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Equity securities |
|
212,360 |
|
212,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
393,254 |
|
393,254 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Subtotal |
|
434,763 |
|
259,610 |
|
166,468 |
|
8,685 |
|
2,208,715 |
|
435,964 |
|
1,630,611 |
|
142,140 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
|
451,071 |
|
|
|
451,071 |
|
|
|
383,460 |
|
|
|
383,460 |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total |
|
$ |
885,834 |
|
$ |
259,610 |
|
$ |
617,539 |
|
$ |
8,685 |
|
$ |
2,592,175 |
|
$ |
435,964 |
|
$ |
2,014,071 |
|
$ |
142,140 |
|
As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our Level 3 investments consisted predominately of corporate securities. On a quarterly basis we evaluate the reasonableness of significant unobservable inputs used in those measurements. For our Level 3 investments, we evaluate, among other things, the terms of the underlying instruments, the credit ratings of the issuers, current market conditions, and other relevant factors. Based on these factors, we assess the risk of realizing expected cash flows and we apply an observable discount rate that reflects
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
this risk. We may also reduce our valuations to reflect a liquidity discount based on the lack of an active market for these securities.
Changes in Level 3 instruments were as follows:
|
|
Level 3 |
| |
|
|
(In thousands) |
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2014 |
|
$ |
142,140 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings |
|
1,089 |
| |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
(403 |
) | |
Purchases |
|
|
| |
Settlements |
|
(134,141 |
) | |
Issuances |
|
|
| |
Transfers into or out of Level 3 |
|
|
| |
Balance as of March 31, 2015 |
|
$ |
8,685 |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we had no transfers in or out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements.
Gains and Losses on Sales and Changes in Carrying Values of Investments
Other, net within Other Income (Expense) included on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) is as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
Ended March 31, |
| ||||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Marketable investment securities - gains (losses) on sales/exchanges |
|
$ |
64,980 |
|
$ |
5,637 |
|
Marketable investment securities - unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for using the Fair Value Option |
|
|
|
4,276 |
| ||
Derivative financial instruments - net realized and/or unrealized gains (losses) |
|
67,611 |
|
(5,304 |
) | ||
Marketable investment securities - other-than-temporary impairments |
|
(5,567 |
) |
(6,130 |
) | ||
Other |
|
(6,735 |
) |
(3,668 |
) | ||
Total |
|
$ |
120,289 |
|
$ |
(5,189 |
) |
7. Inventory
Inventory consisted of the following:
|
|
As of |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Finished goods |
|
$ |
221,576 |
|
$ |
252,238 |
|
Raw materials |
|
166,532 |
|
159,095 |
| ||
Work-in-process |
|
96,639 |
|
82,421 |
| ||
Total inventory |
|
$ |
484,747 |
|
$ |
493,754 |
|
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
8. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
Depreciable |
|
As of |
| ||||
|
|
Life |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
(In Years) |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Equipment leased to customers |
|
2-5 |
|
$ |
3,593,825 |
|
$ |
3,639,607 |
|
EchoStar XV |
|
15 |
|
277,658 |
|
277,658 |
| ||
D1 |
|
15 |
|
150,000 |
|
150,000 |
| ||
T1 |
|
15 |
|
401,721 |
|
401,721 |
| ||
Satellites acquired under capital lease agreements |
|
10-15 |
|
499,819 |
|
499,819 |
| ||
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other |
|
1-10 |
|
754,984 |
|
747,139 |
| ||
Buildings and improvements |
|
1-40 |
|
86,044 |
|
85,509 |
| ||
Land |
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
5,504 |
| ||
Construction in progress |
|
|
|
871,677 |
|
774,567 |
| ||
Total property and equipment |
|
|
|
6,641,232 |
|
6,581,524 |
| ||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
(2,854,832 |
) |
(2,807,985 |
) | ||
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
$ |
3,786,400 |
|
$ |
3,773,539 |
|
Construction in progress consisted of the following:
|
|
As of |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Wireless ground equipment and build-out, including capitalized interest |
|
$ |
546,815 |
|
$ |
484,668 |
|
EchoStar XVIII, including capitalized interest |
|
306,587 |
|
271,497 |
| ||
Other |
|
18,275 |
|
18,402 |
| ||
Total construction in progress |
|
$ |
871,677 |
|
$ |
774,567 |
|
As we prepare for commercialization of our AWS-4 and H Block wireless spectrum licenses, which are recorded in FCC authorizations on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, interest expense related to their carrying value is being capitalized within Property and equipment, net on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets based on our weighted-average borrowing rate for our debt. We began capitalizing interest on the H Block licenses in April 2014 concurrent with the FCC order granting our application to acquire these licenses. See Note 10 for further discussion.
Depreciation and amortization expense consisted of the following:
|
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Equipment leased to customers |
|
$ |
202,184 |
|
$ |
195,214 |
|
Satellites |
|
21,956 |
|
29,896 |
| ||
Buildings, furniture, fixtures, equipment and other |
|
22,072 |
|
24,110 |
| ||
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
246,212 |
|
$ |
249,220 |
|
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
Cost of sales and operating expense categories included in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) do not include depreciation expense related to satellites or equipment leased to customers.
Pay-TV Satellites. We currently utilize 14 satellites in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the equator, one of which we own and depreciate over its useful life. We currently utilize certain capacity on 11 satellites that we lease from EchoStar, which are accounted for as operating leases. We also lease two satellites from third parties, which are accounted for as capital leases and are depreciated over the shorter of the economic life or the term of the satellite agreement.
As of March 31, 2015, our pay-TV satellite fleet consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years) / |
|
|
|
|
|
Degree |
|
Lease |
|
|
|
Launch |
|
Orbital |
|
Termination |
|
Satellites |
|
Date |
|
Location |
|
Date |
|
Owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar XV (1) |
|
July 2010 |
|
45 |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar XVIII (2) |
|
2015 |
|
110 |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased from EchoStar (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar I (3)(4) |
|
December 1995 |
|
77 |
|
November 2015 |
|
EchoStar VII (3)(4) |
|
February 2002 |
|
119 |
|
June 2016 |
|
EchoStar VIII |
|
August 2002 |
|
77 |
|
Month to month |
|
EchoStar IX |
|
August 2003 |
|
121 |
|
Month to month |
|
EchoStar X (3)(4) |
|
February 2006 |
|
110 |
|
February 2021 |
|
EchoStar XI (3)(4) |
|
July 2008 |
|
110 |
|
September 2021 |
|
EchoStar XII (3) |
|
July 2003 |
|
61.5 |
|
September 2017 |
|
EchoStar XIV (3)(4) |
|
March 2010 |
|
119 |
|
February 2023 |
|
EchoStar XVI (5) |
|
November 2012 |
|
61.5 |
|
January 2017 |
|
Nimiq 5 |
|
September 2009 |
|
72.7 |
|
September 2019 |
|
QuetzSat-1 |
|
September 2011 |
|
77 |
|
November 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased from Other Third Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anik F3 |
|
April 2007 |
|
118.7 |
|
April 2022 |
|
Ciel II |
|
December 2008 |
|
129 |
|
January 2019 |
|
(1) See Note 12 for further discussion of our Related Party Transactions with EchoStar.
(2) EchoStar XVIII is expected to launch during the fourth quarter 2015.
(3) We generally have the option to renew each lease on a year-to-year basis through the end of the respective satellites useful life.
(4) On February 20, 2014, we entered into the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar pursuant to which, among other things, we transferred these satellites to EchoStar and lease back all available capacity on these satellites. See Note 6 and Note 12 for further discussion.
(5) We have the option to renew this lease for an additional six-year period. If we exercise our six-year renewal option, we have the option to renew this lease for an additional five years.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
9. Long-Term Debt
Fair Value of our Long-Term Debt
The following table summarizes the carrying and fair values of our debt facilities as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
|
|
As of |
| ||||||||||
|
|
March 31, 2015 |
|
December 31, 2014 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair Value |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (1) |
|
$ |
650,001 |
|
$ |
656,501 |
|
$ |
650,001 |
|
$ |
664,321 |
|
7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 (2) |
|
1,500,000 |
|
1,558,500 |
|
1,500,000 |
|
1,580,625 |
| ||||
4 5/8% Senior Notes due 2017 |
|
900,000 |
|
927,531 |
|
900,000 |
|
933,750 |
| ||||
4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018 |
|
1,200,000 |
|
1,221,000 |
|
1,200,000 |
|
1,245,600 |
| ||||
7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019 |
|
1,400,000 |
|
1,575,952 |
|
1,400,000 |
|
1,589,700 |
| ||||
5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020 |
|
1,100,000 |
|
1,113,750 |
|
1,100,000 |
|
1,100,000 |
| ||||
6 3/4% Senior Notes due 2021 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,130,000 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,157,500 |
| ||||
5 7/8% Senior Notes due 2022 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,025,000 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,055,000 |
| ||||
5% Senior Notes due 2023 |
|
1,500,000 |
|
1,500,000 |
|
1,500,000 |
|
1,470,000 |
| ||||
5 7/8% Senior Notes due 2024 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,012,500 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,019,800 |
| ||||
Other notes payable |
|
33,568 |
|
33,568 |
|
34,084 |
|
34,084 |
| ||||
Subtotal |
|
14,283,569 |
|
$ |
14,754,302 |
|
14,284,085 |
|
$ |
14,850,380 |
| ||
Unamortized deferred financing costs and debt discounts, net |
|
(48,974 |
) |
|
|
(51,473 |
) |
|
| ||||
Capital lease obligations (3) |
|
188,329 |
|
|
|
194,914 |
|
|
| ||||
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations (including current portion) |
|
$ |
14,422,924 |
|
|
|
$ |
14,427,526 |
|
|
|
(1) Our 7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015 mature on May 31, 2015 and are included in Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2015.
(2) Our 7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 mature on February 1, 2016 and have been reclassified to Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2015.
(3) Disclosure regarding fair value of capital leases is not required.
We estimated the fair value of our publicly traded long-term debt using market prices in less active markets (Level 2).
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
DISH Spectrum
We have invested over $5.0 billion since 2008 to acquire certain wireless spectrum licenses and related assets.
700 MHz Licenses. In 2008, we paid $712 million to acquire certain 700 MHz E Block (700 MHz) wireless spectrum licenses, which were granted to us by the FCC in February 2009. At the time they were granted, these licenses were subject to certain interim and final build-out requirements. On October 29, 2013, the FCC issued an order approving a voluntary industry solution to resolve certain interoperability issues affecting the lower 700 MHz spectrum band (the Interoperability Solution Order), which requires us to reduce power emissions on our 700 MHz licenses. As part of the Interoperability Solution Order, the FCC, among other things, approved our request to modify the original interim and final build-out requirements associated with our 700 MHz licenses so that by March 2017, we must provide signal coverage and offer service to at least 40% of our total E Block population (the Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement). The FCC also approved our request to modify the 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement so that by March 2021, we must provide signal coverage and offer service to at least 70% of the population in each of our E Block license areas (the Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement). While the modifications to our 700 MHz licenses provide us additional time to complete the build-out requirements, the reduction in power emissions could have an adverse impact on our ability to fully utilize our 700 MHz licenses. If we fail to meet the Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement, the Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by one year, from March 2021 to March 2020, and we could face the reduction of license area(s). If we fail to meet the Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement, our authorization may terminate for the geographic portion of each license in which we are not providing service.
AWS-4 Licenses. On March 2, 2012, the FCC approved the transfer of 40 MHz of wireless spectrum licenses held by DBSD North America, Inc. (DBSD North America) and TerreStar Networks, Inc. (TerreStar) to us. On March 9, 2012, we completed the acquisition of 100% of the equity of reorganized DBSD North America (the DBSD Transaction) and substantially all of the assets of TerreStar (the TerreStar Transaction), pursuant to which we acquired, among other things, certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by DBSD North America and TerreStar. The total consideration to acquire the DBSD North America and TerreStar assets was approximately $2.860 billion.
On February 15, 2013, the FCC issued an order, which became effective on March 7, 2013, modifying our licenses to expand our terrestrial operating authority with AWS-4 authority (AWS-4). That order imposed certain limitations on the use of a portion of this spectrum, including interference protections for other spectrum users and power and emission limits that we presently believe could render 5 MHz of our uplink spectrum (2000-2005 MHz) effectively unusable for terrestrial services and limit our ability to fully utilize the remaining 15 MHz of our uplink spectrum (2005-2020 MHz) for terrestrial services. These limitations could, among other things, impact the ongoing development of technical standards associated with our wireless business, and may have a material adverse effect on our ability to commercialize our AWS-4 licenses. That order also mandated certain interim and final build-out requirements for the licenses. By March 2017, we must provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service to at least 40% of the aggregate population represented by all of the areas covered by the licenses (the AWS-4 Interim Build-Out Requirement). By March 2020, we were required to provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service to at least 70% of the population in each area covered by an individual license (the AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement).
On December 20, 2013, the FCC issued a further order that, among other things, extended the AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement by one year to March 2021 (the Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement). If we fail to
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
meet the AWS-4 Interim Build-Out Requirement, the Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by one year, from March 2021 to March 2020. If we fail to meet the Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement, our terrestrial authorization for each license area in which we fail to meet the requirement may terminate. The FCCs December 20, 2013 order also conditionally waived certain FCC rules for our AWS-4 licenses to allow us to repurpose all 20 MHz of our uplink spectrum (2000-2020 MHz) for downlink (the AWS-4 Downlink Waiver). If we fail to notify the FCC that we intend to use our uplink spectrum for downlink by June 20, 2016, the AWS-4 Downlink Waiver will terminate, and the Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement will revert back to the AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement.
H Block Licenses. On April 29, 2014, the FCC issued an order granting our application to acquire all 176 wireless spectrum licenses in the H Block auction. We paid approximately $1.672 billion to acquire these H Block licenses, including clearance costs associated with the lower H Block spectrum. The H Block licenses are subject to certain interim and final build-out requirements. By April 2018, we must provide reliable signal coverage and offer service to at least 40% of the population in each area covered by an individual H Block license (the H Block Interim Build-Out Requirement). By April 2024, we must provide reliable signal coverage and offer service to at least 75% of the population in each area covered by an individual H Block license (the H Block Final Build-Out Requirement). If we fail to meet the H Block Interim Build-Out Requirement, the H Block license term and the H Block Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by two years (from April 2024 to April 2022) for each H Block license area in which we fail to meet the requirement. If we fail to meet the H Block Final Build-Out Requirement, our authorization for each H Block license area in which we fail to meet the requirement may terminate. The FCC has adopted rules for the H Block spectrum band that is adjacent to our AWS-4 licenses. Depending on the outcome of the standard-setting process for the H Block and our ultimate decision regarding the AWS-4 Downlink Waiver, the rules that the FCC adopted for the H Block could further impact 15 MHz of our AWS-4 uplink spectrum (2005-2020 MHz), which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to commercialize the AWS-4 licenses.
Commercialization of Our Wireless Spectrum Licenses and Related Assets. We have made substantial investments to acquire certain wireless spectrum licenses and related assets. We may also determine that additional wireless spectrum licenses may be required to commercialize our wireless business and to compete with other wireless service providers. We will need to make significant additional investments or partner with others to, among other things, commercialize, build-out, and integrate these licenses and related assets, and any additional acquired licenses and related assets; and comply with regulations applicable to such licenses. Depending on the nature and scope of such commercialization, build-out, integration efforts, and regulatory compliance, any such investments or partnerships could vary significantly. We may need to raise significant additional capital in the future to fund these efforts, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop and implement a business model that will realize a return on these wireless spectrum licenses or that we will be able to profitably deploy the assets represented by these wireless spectrum licenses, which may affect the carrying value of these assets and our future financial condition or results of operations.
AWS-3 Auction
The AWS-3 Auction commenced on November 13, 2014 and concluded on January 29, 2015. The FCCs prohibition on certain communications related to the AWS-3 Auction expired on February 13, 2015. Also, on February 13, 2015, Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless each filed applications with the FCC to acquire certain AWS-3 Licenses for which it was named as winning bidder and had made the required down payments. Each of Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless has applied as a Designated Entity that is entitled to receive a bidding credit of 25% in the AWS-3 Auction, as defined by FCC regulations. In February 2015, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries received a refund from the FCC of its $400 million upfront payment related to the AWS-3 Auction.
Northstar Wireless was the winning bidder for the Northstar Licenses with gross winning bids totaling approximately $7.845 billion, which after taking into account a 25% bidding credit, equals net winning bids totaling approximately $5.884 billion. Northstar Wireless is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Northstar Spectrum. Through
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
our wholly-owned subsidiary, American AWS-3 Wireless II L.L.C. (American II), we own an 85% non-controlling interest in Northstar Spectrum. Northstar Manager owns a 15% controlling interest in, and is the sole manager of, Northstar Spectrum. Northstar Spectrum is governed by a limited liability company agreement by and between American II and Northstar Manager (the Northstar Spectrum LLC Agreement). Pursuant to the Northstar Spectrum LLC Agreement, American II and Northstar Manager made pro-rata equity contributions in Northstar Spectrum equal to approximately 15% of the net purchase price of the Northstar Licenses. As of March 2, 2015, the total equity contributions from Northstar Manager to Northstar Spectrum were $133 million. American II also entered into a Credit Agreement by and among American II, as Lender, Northstar Wireless, as Borrower, and Northstar Spectrum, as Guarantor (the Northstar Credit Agreement). Pursuant to the Northstar Credit Agreement, American II made loans to Northstar Wireless for approximately 85% of the net purchase price of the Northstar Licenses. After Northstar Wireless made the final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the Northstar Licenses, the total equity contributions from American II to Northstar Spectrum were approximately $750 million and the total loans from American II to Northstar Wireless were approximately $5.001 billion.
SNR Wireless was the winning bidder for the SNR Licenses with gross winning bids totaling approximately $5.482 billion, which after taking into account a 25% bidding credit, equals net winning bids totaling approximately $4.112 billion. In addition to the net winning bids, SNR Wireless made a bid withdrawal payment of approximately $8 million to the FCC. SNR Wireless is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SNR Holdco. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, American AWS-3 Wireless III L.L.C. (American III), we own an 85% non-controlling interest in SNR Holdco. SNR Management owns a 15% controlling interest in, and is the sole manager of, SNR Holdco. SNR Holdco is governed by a limited liability company agreement by and between American III and SNR Management (the SNR Holdco LLC Agreement). Pursuant to the SNR Holdco LLC Agreement, American III and SNR Management made pro-rata equity contributions in SNR Holdco equal to approximately 15% of the net purchase price of the SNR Licenses. As of March 2, 2015, the total equity contributions from SNR Management to SNR Holdco were $93 million. American III also entered into a Credit Agreement by and among American III, as Lender, SNR Wireless, as Borrower, and SNR Holdco, as Guarantor (the SNR Credit Agreement). Pursuant to the SNR Credit Agreement, American III made loans to SNR Wireless for the amount of the bid withdrawal payment and approximately 85% of the net purchase price of the SNR Licenses. After SNR Wireless made the final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the SNR Licenses, the total equity contributions from American III to SNR Holdco were approximately $524 million and the total loans from American III to SNR Wireless were approximately $3.503 billion.
After Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless made the final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, respectively, our total non-controlling equity and debt investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities were approximately $9.778 billion. Issuance of any AWS-3 Licenses to Northstar Wireless or SNR Wireless depends, among other things, upon the FCCs review and approval of the applications filed by Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless. On April 29, 2015, the FCC issued a public notice that, among other things, found the applications filed by Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing. The FCCs public notice also set the following filing deadlines related to the applications: (i) petitions to deny the applications must be filed no later than May 11, 2015; (ii) oppositions to a petition to deny the applications must be filed no later than May 18, 2015; and (iii) replies to oppositions must be filed no later than May 26, 2015. We cannot predict the timing or the outcome of the FCCs review of the applications filed by Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless. In addition, on April 29, 2015, we received a letter from the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (the Senate Committee), requesting certain information related to our relationship with Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless and our participation in the AWS-3 Auction. We cannot predict the timing or the outcome of the Senate Committees inquiry.
In the event that the FCC grants the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, we may need to make significant additional loans to the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities, or they may need to partner with others, so that the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities may commercialize, build-out and integrate the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, and comply with regulations applicable to the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses. Depending
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
upon the nature and scope of such commercialization, build-out, integration efforts, and regulatory compliance, any such loans or partnerships could vary significantly. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain a profitable return on our non-controlling investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities.
Guarantees
During the third quarter 2009, EchoStar entered into a satellite transponder service agreement for Nimiq 5 through 2024. We sublease this capacity from EchoStar and also guarantee a certain portion of EchoStars obligation under its satellite transponder service agreement through 2019. As of March 31, 2015, the remaining obligation of our guarantee was $296 million. As of March 31, 2015, we have not recorded a liability on the balance sheet for this guarantee.
Contingencies
Separation Agreement
On January 1, 2008, we completed the distribution of our technology and set-top box business and certain infrastructure assets (the Spin-off) into a separate publicly-traded company, EchoStar. In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a separation agreement with EchoStar that provides, among other things, for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities resulting from litigation. Under the terms of the separation agreement, EchoStar has assumed certain liabilities that relate to its business, including certain designated liabilities for acts or omissions that occurred prior to the Spin-off. Certain specific provisions govern intellectual property related claims under which, generally, EchoStar will only be liable for its acts or omissions following the Spin-off and we will indemnify EchoStar for any liabilities or damages resulting from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the Spin-off, as well as our acts or omissions following the Spin-off.
Litigation
We are involved in a number of legal proceedings (including those described below) concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our business activities. Many of these proceedings are at preliminary stages, and many of these proceedings seek an indeterminate amount of damages. We regularly evaluate the status of the legal proceedings in which we are involved to assess whether a loss is probable or there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may have been incurred and to determine if accruals are appropriate. If accruals are not appropriate, we further evaluate each legal proceeding to assess whether an estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss can be made.
For certain cases described on the following pages, management is unable to provide a meaningful estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss because, among other reasons, (i) the proceedings are in various stages; (ii) damages have not been sought; (iii) damages are unsupported and/or exaggerated; (iv) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals or motions; (v) there are significant factual issues to be resolved; and/or (vi) there are novel legal issues or unsettled legal theories to be presented or a large number of parties (as with many patent-related cases). For these cases, however, management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcomes of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.
California Institute of Technology
On October 1, 2013, the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) filed complaints against us and our wholly-owned subsidiaries DISH Network L.L.C. and dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C., as well as Hughes Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Systems, LLC, which are subsidiaries of EchoStar, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleges infringement of United States
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
Patent Nos. 7,116,710; 7,421,032; 7,916,781 and 8,284,833, each of which is entitled Serial Concatenation of Interleaved Convolutional Codes forming Turbo-Like Codes. Caltech alleges that encoding data as specified by the DVB-S2 standard infringes each of the asserted patents. In the operative Amended Complaint, served on March 6, 2014, Caltech claims that our Hopper® set-top box, as well as the Hughes defendants satellite broadband products and services, infringe the asserted patents by implementing the DVB-S2 standard. On May 5, 2015, the Court granted summary judgment in our favor as to the DISH products and services alleged in the complaint. On February 17, 2015, Caltech filed a new complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, asserting the same patents against the same defendants. Caltech alleges that certain broadband equipment, including without limitation the HT1000 and HT1100 modems, gateway hardware, software and/or firmware that the Hughes defendants provide to, among others, us for our use in connection with the dishNET branded broadband service, infringes these patents.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
ClearPlay, Inc.
On March 13, 2014, ClearPlay, Inc. (ClearPlay) filed a complaint against us, our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., EchoStar, and its wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The complaint alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,898,799, entitled Multimedia Content Navigation and Playback; 7,526,784, entitled Delivery of Navigation Data for Playback of Audio and Video Content; 7,543,318, entitled Delivery of Navigation Data for Playback of Audio and Video Content; 7,577,970, entitled Multimedia Content Navigation and Playback; and 8,117,282, entitled Media Player Configured to Receive Playback Filters From Alternative Storage Mediums. ClearPlay alleges that the AutoHop feature of our Hopper set-top box infringes the asserted patents. On February 11, 2015, the case was stayed pending various third-party challenges before the United States Patent and Trademark Office regarding the validity of certain of the patents asserted in the action.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
CRFD Research, Inc. (a subsidiary of Marathon Patent Group, Inc.)
On January 17, 2014, CRFD Research, Inc. (CRFD) filed a complaint against us, our wholly-owned subsidiaries DISH DBS Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C., EchoStar, and its wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,191,233 (the 233 patent). The 233 patent is entitled System for Automated, Mid-Session, User-Directed, Device-to-Device Session Transfer System, and relates to transferring an ongoing software session from one device to another. CRFD alleges that our Hopper and Joey® set-top boxes infringe the 233 patent. On the same day, CRFD filed similar complaints against AT&T Inc.; Comcast Corp.; DirecTV; Time Warner Cable Inc.; Cox Communications, Inc.; Akamai Technologies, Inc.; Cablevision Systems Corp. and Limelight Networks, Inc. CRFD is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. On January 26, 2015, we and EchoStar filed a petition before the United States Patent and Trademark Office challenging the validity of the 233 patent.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Custom Media Technologies LLC
On August 15, 2013, Custom Media Technologies LLC (Custom Media) filed complaints against us; AT&T Inc.; Charter Communications, Inc.; Comcast Corp.; Cox Communications, Inc.; DirecTV; Time Warner Cable Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,269,275 (the 275 patent). The 275 patent, which is entitled Method and System for Customizing and Distributing Presentations for User Sites, relates to the provision of customized presentations to viewers over a network, such as a cable television network, an Internet or other computer network, a broadcast television network, and/or a satellite system. Custom Media alleges that our DVR devices and DVR functionality infringe the 275 patent. Custom Media is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. Pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, on November 6, 2013, the Court entered an order substituting DISH Network L.L.C., our wholly-owned subsidiary, as the defendant in our place. Trial is scheduled to commence on September 19, 2016.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Do Not Call Litigation
On March 25, 2009, our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. was sued in a civil action by the United States Attorney General and several states in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Telephone Sales Rules, as well as analogous state statutes and state consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs allege that we, directly and through certain independent third-party retailers and their affiliates, committed certain telemarketing violations. On December 23, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment, which indicated for the first time that the state plaintiffs were seeking civil penalties and damages of approximately $270 million and that the federal plaintiff was seeking an unspecified amount of civil penalties (which could substantially exceed the civil penalties and damages being sought by the state plaintiffs). The plaintiffs are also seeking injunctive relief that if granted would, among other things, enjoin DISH Network L.L.C., whether acting directly or indirectly through authorized telemarketers or independent third-party retailers, from placing any outbound telemarketing calls to market or promote its goods or services for five years, and enjoin DISH Network L.L.C. from accepting activations or sales from certain existing independent third-party retailers and from certain new independent third-party retailers, except under certain circumstances. We also filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking dismissal of all claims. On December 12, 2014, the Court issued its opinion with respect to the parties summary judgment motions. The Court found that DISH Network L.L.C. is entitled to partial summary judgment with respect to one claim in the action. In addition, the Court found that the plaintiffs are entitled to partial summary judgment with respect to ten claims in the action, which includes, among other things, findings by the Court establishing DISH Network L.L.C.s liability for a substantial amount of the alleged outbound telemarketing calls by DISH Network L.L.C. and certain of its independent third-party retailers that were the subject of the plaintiffs motion. The Court did not issue any injunctive relief and did not make any determination on civil penalties or damages, ruling instead that the scope of any injunctive relief and the amount of any civil penalties or damages are questions for trial. Trial is scheduled to commence on July 21, 2015. In recent pre-trial disclosures, the federal plaintiff has informed us that it intends to seek up to $900 million in alleged civil penalties at trial, and the state plaintiffs have informed us that they now intend to seek $23.5 billion in alleged civil penalties and damages.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
We intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC
On December 20, 2013, Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC (Dragon IP) filed complaints against our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., as well as Apple Inc.; AT&T, Inc.; Charter Communications, Inc.; Comcast Corp.; Cox Communications, Inc.; DirecTV; Sirius XM Radio Inc.; Time Warner Cable Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,930,444 (the 444 patent), which is entitled Simultaneous Recording and Playback Apparatus. Dragon IP alleges that various of our DVR receivers infringe the 444 patent. Dragon IP is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. On December 23, 2014, DISH Network L.L.C. filed a petition before the United States Patent and Trademark Office challenging the validity of the 444 patent. On April 10, 2015, the Court granted DISH Network L.L.C.s motion to stay the action in light of DISH Network L.L.C.s petition and certain other defendants petitions pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office challenging the validity of the 444 patent.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Grecia
On March 27, 2015, William Grecia (Grecia) filed a complaint against our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,533,860 (the 860 patent), which is entitled Personalized Digital Media Access SystemPDMAS Part II. Grecia alleges that we violate the 860 patent in connection with our digital rights management. Grecia is the named inventor on the 860 patent.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
The Hopper Litigation
On May 24, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.; CBS Corporation; Fox Entertainment Group, Inc.; Fox Television Holdings, Inc.; Fox Cable Network Services, L.L.C. and NBCUniversal, LLC. In the lawsuit, we sought a declaratory judgment that we are not infringing any defendants copyright, or breaching any defendants retransmission consent agreement, by virtue of the PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features of our Hopper set-top box. A consumer can use the PrimeTime Anytime feature, at his or her option, to record certain primetime programs airing on ABC, CBS, Fox, and/or NBC up to every night, and to store those recordings for up to eight days. A consumer can use the AutoHop feature, at his or her option, to watch certain recordings that the subscriber made with our PrimeTime Anytime feature, commercial-free, if played back at a certain point after the shows original airing.
Later on May 24, 2012, (i) Fox Broadcasting Company; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Fox Television Holdings, Inc. filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature, the AutoHop feature, as well as Slingbox placeshifting functionality infringe their copyrights and breach their retransmission consent agreements, (ii) NBC Studios LLC; Universal Network Television, LLC; Open 4 Business Productions LLC and NBCUniversal, LLC filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights, and (iii) CBS Broadcasting Inc.; CBS Studios Inc. and Survivor Productions LLC filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights.
As a result of certain parties competing venue-related motions brought in both the New York and California actions, and certain networks filing various counterclaims and amended complaints, the claims have proceeded in the following venues: (1) the copyright and contract claims regarding the ABC and CBS parties in New York; and (2) the copyright and contract claims regarding the Fox and NBC parties in California.
California Actions. The NBC plaintiffs and Fox plaintiffs filed amended complaints in their respective California actions, adding copyright claims against EchoStar and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., a wholly-owned subsidiary of EchoStar. In addition, the Fox plaintiffs amended complaint added claims challenging the Hopper Transfers feature of our second-generation Hopper set-top box.
On November 7, 2012, the California court denied the Fox plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top boxs PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features, and the Fox plaintiffs appealed. On March 27, 2013, at the request of the parties, the Central District of California granted a stay of all proceedings in the action brought by the NBC plaintiffs, pending resolution of the appeal by the Fox plaintiffs. On July 24, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of the Fox plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction as to the PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features. On August 7, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, which was denied on January 24, 2014. The United States Supreme Court granted the Fox plaintiffs an extension until May 23, 2014 to file a petition for writ of certiorari, but they did not file one. As a result, the stay of the NBC plaintiffs action expired. On August 6, 2014, at the request of the parties, the Central District of California granted a further stay of all proceedings in the action brought by the NBC plaintiffs, pending a final judgment on all claims in the Fox plaintiffs action. No trial date is currently set on the NBC claims.
In addition, on February 21, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a second motion for preliminary injunction against: (i) us seeking to enjoin the Hopper Transfers feature in our second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging breach of their retransmission consent agreement; and (ii) us and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. seeking to enjoin the Slingbox placeshifting functionality in our second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging copyright infringement and breach of their retransmission consent agreement. On September 23, 2013, the California court denied the Fox plaintiffs motion. The Fox plaintiffs appealed, and on July 14, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of the Fox plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction as to the Hopper Transfers feature and the Slingbox placeshifting functionality in our second-generation Hopper set-top box.
On January 12, 2015, the Court ruled on the Fox plaintiffs and our respective motions for summary judgment, holding that: (a) the Slingbox placeshifting functionality and the PrimeTime Anytime, AutoHop and Hopper Transfers features do not violate the copyright laws; (b) certain quality assurance copies (which were discontinued in November 2012) do violate the copyright laws; and (c) the Slingbox placeshifting functionality, the Hopper Transfers feature and such quality assurance copies breach our Fox retransmission consent agreement. The only issue remaining for trial is the amount of damages (if any) on the claims upon which the Fox plaintiffs prevailed on summary judgment, but the Court ruled that the Fox plaintiffs could not pursue disgorgement as a remedy. At the parties joint request, the Court has stayed the case until October 1, 2015, and no trial date has been set.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
New York Actions. Both the ABC and CBS parties filed counterclaims in the New York action adding copyright claims against EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., and the CBS parties filed a counterclaim alleging that we fraudulently concealed the AutoHop feature when negotiating the renewal of our CBS retransmission consent agreement. On November 23, 2012, the ABC plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top boxs PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features. On September 18, 2013, the New York court denied that motion. The ABC plaintiffs appealed, and oral argument on the appeal was heard on February 20, 2014 before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Pursuant to a settlement between us and the ABC parties, during March 2014, the ABC parties withdrew their appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; we and the ABC parties dismissed without prejudice all of our respective claims pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; and the ABC parties granted a covenant not to sue. Pursuant to a settlement between us and the CBS parties, on December 10, 2014, we and the CBS parties dismissed with prejudice all of our respective claims pending in the New York Court.
We intend to vigorously prosecute and defend our position in these cases. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted copyrights, or are in breach of any of the retransmission consent agreements, we may be subject to substantial damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. In addition, as a result of this litigation, we may not be able to renew certain of our retransmission consent agreements and other programming agreements on favorable terms or at all. If we are unable to renew these agreements, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain substitute programming, or that such substitute programming would be comparable in quality or cost to our existing programming. Loss of access to existing programming could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including, among other things, our gross new subscriber activations and subscriber churn rate. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
LightSquared/Harbinger Capital Partners LLC (LightSquared Bankruptcy)
As previously disclosed in our public filings, L-Band Acquisition, LLC (LBAC), our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a Plan Support Agreement (the PSA) with certain senior secured lenders to LightSquared LP (the LightSquared LP Lenders) on July 23, 2013, which contemplated the purchase by LBAC of substantially all of the assets of LightSquared LP and certain of its subsidiaries (the LBAC Bid) that are debtors and debtors in possession in the LightSquared bankruptcy cases pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court), which cases are jointly administered under the caption In re LightSquared Inc., et. al., Case No. 12 12080 (SCC).
Pursuant to the PSA, LBAC was entitled to terminate the PSA in certain circumstances, certain of which required three business days written notice, including, without limitation, in the event that certain milestones specified in the PSA were not met. On January 7, 2014, LBAC delivered written notice of termination of the PSA to the LightSquared LP Lenders. As a result, the PSA terminated effective on January 10, 2014, and the LBAC Bid was withdrawn.
On August 6, 2013, Harbinger Capital Partners LLC and other affiliates of Harbinger (collectively, Harbinger), a shareholder of LightSquared Inc., filed an adversary proceeding against us, LBAC, EchoStar, Charles W. Ergen (our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer), SP Special Opportunities, LLC (SPSO) (an entity controlled by Mr. Ergen), and certain other parties, in the Bankruptcy Court. Harbinger alleged, among other things, claims based on fraud, unfair competition, civil conspiracy and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage related to certain purchases of LightSquared secured debt by SPSO. Subsequently, LightSquared intervened to join in certain claims alleged against certain defendants other than us, LBAC and EchoStar.
On October 29, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed all of the claims in Harbingers complaint in their entirety, but granted leave for LightSquared to file its own complaint in intervention. On November 15, 2013, LightSquared
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
filed its complaint, which included various claims against us, EchoStar, Mr. Ergen and SPSO. On December 2, 2013, Harbinger filed an amended complaint, asserting various claims against SPSO. On December 12, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed several of the claims asserted by LightSquared and Harbinger. The surviving claims included, among others, LightSquareds claims against SPSO for declaratory relief, breach of contract and statutory disallowance; LightSquareds tortious interference claim against us, EchoStar and Mr. Ergen; and Harbingers claim against SPSO for statutory disallowance. These claims proceeded to a non-jury trial on January 9, 2014. In its Post-Trial Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered on June 10, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court rejected all claims against us and EchoStar, and it rejected some but not all claims against the other defendants.
We intend to vigorously defend any claims against us in this proceeding and cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of this proceeding or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
LightSquared/Harbinger Capital Partners LLC (LightSquared Colorado Action)
On July 8, 2014, Harbinger filed suit against us, LBAC, Mr. Ergen, SPSO, and certain other parties, in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The complaint asserts claims for tortious interference with contract and abuse of process, as well as claims alleging violations of the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act and the Colorado Organized Crime Control Act. Harbinger seeks to rely on many of the same facts and circumstances that were at issue in the LightSquared adversary proceeding pending in the Bankruptcy Court. Harbinger argues that the defendants alleged conduct, among other things, is responsible for Harbingers losing control of LightSquared and causing breaches of Harbingers stockholder agreement. The complaint seeks damages in excess of $500 million, which under federal and state law may be trebled. On April 28, 2015, the District Court granted our motion to dismiss the complaint.
We intend to vigorously defend any claims against us in this case and cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of this proceeding or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
LightSquared Transaction Shareholder Derivative Actions
On August 9, 2013, a purported shareholder of the Company, Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund (Jacksonville PFPF), filed a putative shareholder derivative action in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty claims against the members of the Companys Board of Directors as of that date: Charles W. Ergen; Joseph P. Clayton; James DeFranco; Cantey M. Ergen; Steven R. Goodbarn; David K. Moskowitz; Tom A. Ortolf; and Carl E. Vogel (collectively, the Director Defendants). In its first amended complaint, Jacksonville PFPF asserted claims that Mr. Ergen breached his fiduciary duty to the Company in connection with certain purchases of LightSquared debt by SPSO, an entity controlled by Mr. Ergen, and that the other Director Defendants aided and abetted that alleged breach of duty. The Jacksonville PFPF claims alleged that (1) the debt purchases created an impermissible conflict of interest and (2) put at risk the LBAC Bid, which as noted above has been withdrawn. Jacksonville PFPF further claimed that most members of the Companys Board of Directors are beholden to Mr. Ergen to an extent that prevents them from discharging their duties in connection with the Companys participation in the LightSquared bankruptcy auction process. Jacksonville PFPF is seeking an unspecified amount of damages. Jacksonville PFPF dismissed its claims against Mr. Goodbarn on October 8, 2013.
Jacksonville PFPF sought a preliminary injunction that would enjoin Mr. Ergen and all of the Director Defendants other than Mr. Goodbarn from influencing the Companys efforts to acquire certain assets of LightSquared in the bankruptcy proceeding. On November 27, 2013, the Court denied that request but granted narrower relief enjoining Mr. Ergen and anyone acting on his behalf from participating in negotiations related to one aspect of the LBAC Bid, which, as noted above, has been withdrawn.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
Five alleged shareholders have filed substantially similar putative derivative complaints in state and federal courts alleging the same or substantially similar claims. On September 18, 2013, DCM Multi-Manager Fund, LLC filed a duplicative putative derivative complaint in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada, which was consolidated with the Jacksonville PFPF action on October 9, 2013. Between September 25, 2013 and October 2, 2013, City of Daytona Beach Police Officers and Firefighters Retirement System, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System and Iron Worker Mid-South Pension Fund filed duplicative putative derivative complaints in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Also on October 2, 2013, Iron Workers District Council (Philadelphia and Vicinity) Retirement and Pension Plan filed its complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
On October 11, 2013, Iron Worker Mid-South Pension Fund dismissed its claims without prejudice. On October 30, 2013, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System dismissed its claims without prejudice and, on January 2, 2014, filed a new complaint in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada, which, on May 2, 2014, was consolidated with the Jacksonville PFPF action. On December 13, 2013, City of Daytona Beach Police Officers and Firefighters Retirement System voluntarily dismissed its claims without prejudice. On March 28, 2014, Iron Workers District Council (Philadelphia and Vicinity) Retirement and Pension Plan voluntarily dismissed its claims without prejudice.
On July 25, 2014, Jacksonville PFPF filed a second amended complaint, which added claims against George R. Brokaw and Charles M. Lillis, as Director Defendants, and Thomas A. Cullen, R. Stanton Dodge and K. Jason Kiser, as officers of the Company. Jacksonville PFPF asserted five claims in its second amended complaint, each of which alleged breaches of the duty of loyalty. Three of the claims were asserted solely against Mr. Ergen; one claim was made against all of the remaining Director Defendants, other than Mr. Ergen and Mr. Clayton; and the final claim was made against Messrs. Cullen, Dodge and Kiser.
Our Board of Directors has established a Special Litigation Committee to review the factual allegations and legal claims in these actions. On October 24, 2014, the Special Litigation Committee filed a report in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada regarding its investigation of the claims and allegations asserted in Jacksonville PFPFs second amended complaint. The Special Litigation Committee filed a motion to dismiss the action based, among other things, on its determination that it is in the best interests of the Company not to pursue the claims asserted by Jacksonville PFPF. The Director Defendants and Messrs. Cullen, Dodge and Kiser have also filed various motions to dismiss the action. The Court will hold a hearing on the Special Litigation Committees and the defendants motions on July 16, 2015. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Personalized Media Communications, Inc.
During 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. (PMC) filed suit against us; EchoStar and Motorola Inc., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,109,414; 4,965,825; 5,233,654; 5,335,277 and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing. PMC is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. Subsequently, Motorola Inc. settled with PMC, leaving us and EchoStar as defendants. On July 18, 2012, pursuant to a Court order, PMC filed a Second Amended Complaint that added Rovi Guides, Inc. (f/k/a/ Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.) and TVG-PMC, Inc. (collectively, Gemstar) as a party, and added a new claim against all defendants seeking a declaratory judgment as to the scope of Gemstars license to the patents in suit, under which we and EchoStar are sublicensees. On August 12, 2014, in response to the parties respective summary judgment motions related to the Gemstar license issues, the Court ruled in favor of PMC and dismissed all claims by or against Gemstar and entered partial final judgment in PMCs favor as to those claims. On September 16, 2014, we and EchoStar filed a notice of appeal of that partial final judgment. PMCs damages expert had contended that we and EchoStar are liable for damages ranging from
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
approximately $500 million to $650 million as of March 31, 2012, and subsequently modified such damages as ranging from approximately $150 million to $450 million, as of September 30, 2014, which did not include pre-judgment interest and could be trebled under Federal law. On May 7, 2015, we, EchoStar and PMC entered into a settlement and release agreement that provides, among other things, for a license by PMC to us and EchoStar for certain patents and patent applications and the dismissal of all of PMCs claims in the action against us and EchoStar with prejudice.
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C./LPL Licensing, L.L.C.
On October 17, 2014, Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. and LPL Licensing, L.L.C. (together referred to as Phoenix) filed a complaint against us and our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,987,434 entitled Apparatus and Method for Transacting Marketing and Sales of Financial Products; 7,890,366 entitled Personalized Communication Documents, System and Method for Preparing Same; 8,352,317 entitled System for Facilitating Production of Variable Offer Communications; 8,234,184 entitled Automated Reply Generation Direct Marketing System; and 6,999,938 entitled Automated Reply Generation Direct Marketing System. Phoenix alleges that we infringe the asserted patents by making and using products and services that generate customized marketing materials. Phoenix is an entity that seeks to license a patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. Trial is set scheduled to commence on March 14, 2016.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Qurio Holdings, Inc.
On September 26, 2014, Qurio Holdings, Inc. (Qurio) filed a complaint against us and our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,102,863 entitled Highspeed WAN To Wireless LAN Gateway and United States Patent No. 7,787,904 entitled Personal Area Network Having Media Player And Mobile Device Controlling The Same. On the same day, Qurio filed similar complaints against Comcast and DirecTV. On November 13, 2014, Qurio filed a first amended complaint, which added a claim alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,879,567 entitled High-Speed WAN To Wireless LAN Gateway. Qurio is an entity that seeks to license a patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. On February 9, 2015, the Court granted DISH Network L.L.C.s motion to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C.
On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C. (TDL) filed suit against us and EchoStar, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. Re. 35,952, which relates to certain favorite channel features. TDL is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. The case has been stayed since July 2009 pending two reexamination petitions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
TQ Beta LLC
On June 30, 2014, TQ Beta LLC (TQ Beta) filed a complaint against us; our wholly-owned subsidiaries DISH DBS Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C; EchoStar; and EchoStars subsidiaries EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation, and Sling Media Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The Complaint alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 7,203,456 (the 456 patent), which is entitled Method and Apparatus for Time and Space Domain Shifting of Broadcast Signals. TQ Beta alleges that our Hopper set-top boxes, ViP 722 and ViP 722k DVR devices, as well as our DISH Anywhere service and DISH Anywhere mobile application, infringe the 456 patent. TQ Beta is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. Trial is scheduled to commence on January 12, 2016.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Tse
On May 30, 2012, Ho Keung Tse filed a complaint against our wholly-owned subsidiary Blockbuster L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,665,797 (the 797 patent), which is entitled Protection of Software Again [sic] Against Unauthorized Use. Mr. Tse is the named inventor on the 797 patent. On the same day that he sued Blockbuster, Mr. Tse filed a separate action in the same court alleging infringement of the same patent against Google Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and HTC America Inc. He also has earlier-filed litigation on the same patent pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Sony Connect, Inc.; Napster, Inc.; Apple Computer, Inc.; Realnetworks, Inc. and MusicMatch, Inc. On March 8, 2013, the Court granted Blockbusters motion to transfer the matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the same venue where the matter against Google Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and HTC America Inc. also was transferred. On December 11, 2013, the Court granted our motion for summary judgment based on invalidity of the 797 patent. Mr. Tse filed a notice of appeal on January 8, 2014, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ordered that the appeal be submitted to a three judge panel of the Federal Circuit on July 10, 2014 without oral argument. On July 16, 2014, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Courts entry of summary judgment in our favor. On August 11, 2014, Mr. Tse filed a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, which the Federal Circuit denied on September 15, 2014. On December 11, 2014, Mr. Tse filed a petition for a writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court, which was denied on February 23, 2015. This matter is now concluded.
Waste Disposal Inquiry
The California Attorney General and the Alameda County (California) District Attorney are investigating whether certain of our waste disposal policies, procedures and practices are in violation of the California Business and Professions Code and the California Health and Safety Code. We expect that these entities will seek injunctive and monetary relief. The investigation appears to be part of a broader effort to investigate waste handling and disposal processes of a number of industries. While we are unable to predict the outcome of this investigation, we do not believe that the outcome will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, including, among other things, disputes with programmers regarding fees. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.
11. Segment Reporting
Operating segments are components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker(s) of an enterprise. Operating income is the primary measure used by our chief operating decision maker to evaluate segment operating performance. We currently operate two primary business segments, DISH and Wireless. See Note 1 for further discussion.
All other and eliminations primarily include intersegment eliminations related to intercompany debt, which is eliminated in consolidation.
The total assets, revenue and operating income by segment were as follows:
|
|
As of |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Total assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
DISH |
|
$ |
22,376,670 |
|
$ |
21,388,131 |
|
Wireless (1) |
|
15,918,506 |
|
7,577,894 |
| ||
All other and eliminations |
|
(15,369,971 |
) |
(6,894,817 |
) | ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
22,925,205 |
|
$ |
22,071,208 |
|