Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business

REGI U.S., Inc. herein (“the Company”) was incorporated in the State of Oregon, U.S.A. on July 27, 1992.

The Company is a development stage company engaged in the business of developing and commercially exploiting an improved axial vane type rotary engine known as the Rand Cam/Direct Charge Engine (“The RC/DC Engine”). The world-wide marketing and intellectual rights, other than the U.S., are held by Rand Energy Group Inc. (“REGI”), which is a major shareholder of the Company. The Company owns the U.S. marketing and intellectual rights and has a project cost sharing agreement, whereby it will fund 50% of the further development of the RC/DC Engine and REGI will fund 50%.

In a development stage company, management devotes most of its activities to establishing a new business. Planned principal activities have not yet produced any revenues and the Company has suffered recurring operating losses as is normal in development stage companies. The Company also has a working capital deficit of $242,248. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to emerge from the development stage with respect to its planned principal business activity is dependent upon its successful efforts to raise additional equity financing, receive funding from affiliates and controlling shareholders, and develop a market for its products.

The Company plans to raise funds through loans from a shareholder REGI. REGI owns approximately 24% of the shares of the Company, having an approximate current market value of $1,373,000 as at October 3, 2003, and plans to sell shares as needed to meet ongoing funding requirements if traditional equity sources of financing prove to be insufficient.

The Company receives interim support from its ultimate parent company and other affiliated companies and plans to raise additional capital through debt and/or equity financings.

There continues to be insufficient funds to provide enough working capital to fund ongoing operations for the next twelve months. The Company may raise additional funds through the exercise of warrants and stock options, if exercised.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a)

Fiscal year

The Company’s fiscal year end is April 30.

(b)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(c)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

(d)

Long-Lived Assets

Costs to register and protect patents and to acquire rights are capitalized as incurred. These costs are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years. Long-lived assets are evaluated in each reporting period to determine if there were events or circumstances, which would indicate a possible inability to recover the carrying amount. Such evaluation is based on various analyses including assessing the Company’s ability to bring the commercial applications to market, related profitability projections and undiscounted cash flows relating to each application which necessarily involves significant management judgment. Where an impairment loss has been determined the carrying amount is written-down to fair market value. Fair market value is determined as the amount at which the long-lived asset could be sold in a current transaction between willing parties.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

(e)

Foreign Currency Transactions/Balances

Transactions in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the rate in effect on the transaction date. Any balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars using the rate in effect on the balance sheet date.

(f)

Revenue Recognition

Product sales are recognized at the time goods are shipped. System and project revenue are recognized utilizing the percentage of completion method that recognizes project revenue and profit during construction based on expected total profit and estimated progress towards completion during the reporting period. All related costs are recognized in the period in which they occur. Revenue from licensing the right for others to use the technology is recognized as earned over time and collection is certain.

(g)

Comprehensive Income

SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. As at July 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company has no items that represent comprehensive income and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive income in the financial statements.

(h)

Accounting for Stock Based Compensation

The Company uses the intrinsic value based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB Opinion No. 25”) in accounting for its stock based method, compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock at grant date over the amount an employee or director must pay to acquire the stock. See Note 4(b).

(i)

Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share

The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share” (SFAS 128). SFAS 128 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per shares (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including stock options, using the treasury stock method, and convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

(j)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). The requirements of SFAS No. 150 apply to issuers’ classification and measurement of freestanding financial instruments, including those that comprise more than one option or forward contract. SFAS No. 150 does not apply to features that are embedded in a financial instrument that is not a derivative in its entirety. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for mandatory redeemable financial instruments of non-public entities. It is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of SFAS No. 150 and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. Restatement is not permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

(j)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation –Transition and Disclosure," which amends SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require more prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The transition provisions of SFAS No. 148 are effective for fiscal years ended after December 15, 2002. SFAS No. 148 does not have any effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial position as the Company has no stock-based employee compensation. The Company will adopt the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148 if stock-based compensation is awarded to employees.

In June 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. This Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)”. This Statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. The Company adopted SFAS No. 146 on January 1, 2003. The effect of adoption of this standard on the Company’s results of operations and financial position was not material.

FASB has also issued SFAS No. 145, 147 and 149 but they will not have any relationship to the operations of the Company therefore a description of each and their respective impact on the Company’s operations have not been disclosed.

(k)

Interim Financial Statements

These interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year or for any future period.

Long-Lived Assets

(a)

On August 20, 1992 the Company acquired the U.S. rights to the original Rand Cam-Engine from REGI by issuing 5,700,000 shares at a fair value of $0.01 per share. REGI will receive a 5% net profit royalty. The $57,000 was charged to operations as research and development.

Long-Lived Assets (continued)

(b)

Pursuant to an agreement with a former director, the Company acquired the U.S. rights to the improved axial vane rotary engine known as the RC/DC Engine. In consideration for the transferred technology, the former director was issued 100,000 shares of Reg Technologies Inc. (“REG”) (a public company owning 51% of REGI) with a fair value of $200,000. The $200,000 was charged to operations as research and development. A 1% net profit royalty will be due to the former director.

(c)

Pursuant to a letter of understanding dated December 13, 1993 between the Company, REGI and REG (collectively called the grantors) and West Virginia University Research Corporation (“WVURC”), the grantors have agreed that WVURC shall own 5% of all patented technology and will receive 5% of all net profits from sales, licences, royalties or income derived from the patented technology.

Common Stock

(a)
  

Warrants Outstanding

There are warrants outstanding to acquire 145,000 shares exercisable at $0.30 per share with expiry dates ranging from October 17, 2003 to December 11, 2003. There are a further 173,120 warrants outstanding to acquire 173,120 shares exercisable at $0.20 per share expiring on July 7, 2003.

(b)

Stock Option Plan

The Company has a Stock Option Plan to issue up to 2,500,000 shares to certain key directors and employees, approved April 30, 1993 and amended December 5, 2000. Pursuant to the Plan the Company has granted stock options to certain directors and employees.
The options are granted for services provided to the Company. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS 123") requires that an enterprise recognize, or at its option, disclose the impact of the fair value of stock options and other forms of stock based compensation in the determination of income. The Company has elected under SFAS 123 to continue to measure compensation costs on the intrinsic value basis set out in APB Opinion No. 25. As stock options are granted at exercise prices based on the market price of the Company’s shares at the date of grant, no compensation cost is recognized. However, under SFAS 123, the impact on net income and income per share of the fair value of stock options must be measured and disclosed on a fair value based method on a pro forma basis. As performance stock is issued for services rendered the fair value of the shares issued is recorded as compensation expense or capitalized, at the date the conditions are met to issue shares.

The fair value of the employee’s purchase rights, pursuant to stock options, under SFAS 123, was estimated using the Black-Scholes model.

The weighted average number of shares under option and option price for the period ended July 31, 2003 is as follows:

If compensation expense had been determined pursuant to SFAS 123, the Company’s net loss and net loss per share for the quarter ended July 31, 2003 and 2002 would have been as follows:

Performance Stock Plan

The Company has allotted 1,000,000 shares to be issued pursuant to a Performance Stock Plan approved and registered on June 27, 1997. Compensation is recorded when the conditions to issue shares are met at their then fair market value. There are no options currently granted pursuant to this plan.

Private Placement

During fiscal 2003 the Company received proceeds of $25,968 ($21,468 from related companies) through a completed private placement of 173,120 units at $0.15 per unit. These units were issued on July 22, 2003. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at a price of $0.20 per share expiring on July 7, 2004. The common stock offered will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements. The common stock issued has not been registered with or approved by any state securities agency or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and were sold pursuant to exemptions from registration.

Amounts owing to related parties are unsecured, non-interest bearing and are due on demand. These companies are related through significant ownership of the Company, having common officers and directors, and sharing the same office.
During the three months ended July 31, 2003:

The value of consulting services of $30,000 was contributed by the President, CEO and director of the Company and charged to operations and treated as donated capital.

The value of consulting services of $7,500 was contributed by the Vice President and director of the Company and charged to operations and treated as donated capital.

The value of consulting services of $7,500 was contributed by the CFO, COO and director of the Company and charged to operations and treated as donated capital.

The value of technical consulting services of $7,500 was contributed by the Vice President of Research and Development of the Company and charged to operations and treated as donated capital.

Rent of $1,500 was paid to a company having common officers and directors.

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

(a)

The Company is committed to fund 50% of the further development of the RC/DC Engine.

(b)

See Note 1 for substantial doubt about continuing as a going concern.

(c)

On July 31, 2003, the Company entered into two consulting agreements with individuals who will provide investor and public relations services to the Company. Subsequent to the quarter, the Company issued 150,000 free trading shares and issued warrants to each individual as follows: 150,000 warrants exercisable at $0.12 each to be exercised within 30 days, 125,000 warrants exercisable at $0.20 each to be exercised within 60 days, 150,000 warrants exercisable at $0.30 each to be exercised within 90 days subject to a renewed consulting agreement, and 125,000 warrants exercisable at $0.50 each to be exercised within 90 days subject to a renewed consulting agreement.

Subsequent Events

(a)

On August 1, 2003, 200,000 stock options were cancelled due to non-performance. The Company also granted 100,000 stock options at $0.20 per share expiring on August 1, 2008.

(b)

On August 8, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with an individual who will provide financial consulting services to the Company. The Company issued 100,000 shares as a retainer for services to be rendered.

(c)

On September 10, 2003, the Company granted 150,000 stock options at $0.25 per share expiring on September 10, 2008.

In addition to the restatements noted above certain other financial statement note disclosure revisions were made to improve the overall required disclosure of financial information of the Company’s financial statements.

funds through loans from a shareholder (Rand Energy Group Inc.). Rand Energy Group Inc. owns approximately 24% of the shares of the Company, having an approximate current market value of $1,373,000 as at October 3, 2003, and plans to sell shares as needed to meet our ongoing funding requirements if traditional equity sources of financing prove to be insufficient.

Item 3. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and are operating in an effective manner.

Changes in internal controls. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their most recent evaluation.

Other Information

It was discovered by our auditors that the independent accountant who reviewed the previously filed form 10-QSB was not qualified to perform the review and subsequent to the initial filing our auditors performed the review resulting in the amendment. Additionally, the Company has restated its financial statements for the quarter ended July 31, 2003. The nature of the restatements and the effect on net loss and loss per share are set out in the Management Discussion and Analysis above.

Exhibits

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of John G. Robertson, President (Principal Executive Officer), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002