Edgar Filing: CARTERS INC

form10_q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 3, 2010 OR

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _____ TO ______

Commission file number:

001-31829

CARTER’S, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	13-3912933
(state or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

The Proscenium

1170 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 900

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(404) 745-2700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (X) No ( )

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes (X) No ( )

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large Accelerated Filer (X) Accelerated Filer ( ) Non-Accelerated Filer ( ) Smaller Reporting Company ( )

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ( ) No (X)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock		Outstanding Shares at July 30, 2010
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share		59,442,933

CARTER’S, INC.

INDEX

		Page
Part I. Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010		1

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six-month periods ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009		2

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six-month periods ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009		3

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the six-month period ended July 3, 2010		4

	Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		5

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		17

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		29

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		30

Part II. Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		31

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		31

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		37

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		37

Item 4.	Removed and Reserved		37

Item 5.	Other Information		37

Item 6.	Exhibits		37
Signatures			38
Certifications			39

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CARTER’S, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except for share data)

(unaudited)

	July 3, 2010			January 2, 2010

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	245,013		$	335,041
Accounts receivable, net		99,526			82,094
Finished goods inventories, net		260,660			214,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		11,583			11,114
Deferred income taxes		25,726			33,419

Total current assets		642,508			675,668
Property, plant, and equipment, net		90,374			86,077
Tradenames		305,733			305,733
Goodwill		136,570			136,570
Deferred debt issuance costs, net		1,459			2,469
Licensing agreements, net		137			1,777
Other assets		292			305

Total assets	$	1,177,073		$	1,208,599

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	3,503		$	3,503
Accounts payable		121,047			97,546
Other current liabilities		31,848			69,568

Total current liabilities		156,398			170,617
Long-term debt		229,269			331,020
Deferred income taxes		108,162			110,676
Other long-term liabilities		44,105			40,262

Total liabilities		537,934			652,575

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock; par value $.01 per share; 100,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010		--			--
Common stock, voting; par value $.01 per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 59,442,933 and 58,081,822 shares issued and outstanding at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively		594			581
Additional paid-in capital		256,048			235,330
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,603	)		(4,066	)
Retained earnings		386,100			324,179

Total stockholders’ equity		639,139			556,024

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,177,073		$	1,208,599

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CARTER’S, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

	For the three-month periods ended						For the six-month periods ended
	July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009			July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009

Net sales	$	327,009		$	326,329		$	736,058		$	683,491
Cost of goods sold		196,758			201,619			438,997			431,059

Gross profit		130,251			124,710			297,061			252,432
Selling, general, and administrative expenses		104,468			99,843			209,763			198,973
Workforce reduction and facility write-down and closure costs		--			2,980			--			11,400
Royalty income		(7,640	)		(7,472	)		(17,294	)		(16,234	)

Operating income		33,423			29,359			104,592			58,293
Interest expense, net		2,662			2,708			5,106			5,883

Income before income taxes		30,761			26,651			99,486			52,410
Provision for income taxes		11,665			10,017			37,565			19,172

Net income	$	19,096		$	16,634		$	61,921		$	33,238

Basic net income per common share (Note 13)	$	0.32		$	0.29		$	1.05		$	0.59
Diluted net income per common share (Note 13)	$	0.32		$	0.28		$	1.03		$	0.57

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CARTER’S, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

(unaudited)

	For the six-month periods ended
	July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	61,921		$	33,238
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		16,082			16,990
Amortization of debt issuance costs		1,010			567
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense		3,510			3,543
Income tax benefit from exercised stock options		(8,579	)		(1,313	)
Non-cash asset impairment and facility write-down charges		--			3,662
Gain on sale of property, plant, and equipment		(172	)		--
Deferred income taxes		5,152			2,853
Effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(17,432	)		401
Inventories		(46,660	)		(52,665	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(456	)		(767	)
Accounts payable and other liabilities		952			22,687

Net cash provided by operating activities		15,328			29,196

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(20,720	)		(18,030	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment		286			--

Net cash used in investing activities		(20,434	)		(18,030	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on Term Loan (See Note 4)		(101,751	)		(1,751	)
Income tax benefit from exercised stock options		8,579			1,313
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		8,250			735

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(84,922	)		297

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(90,028	)		11,463
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		335,041			162,349

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	245,013		$	173,812

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CARTER’S, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(dollars in thousands, except for share data)

(unaudited)

	Common stock		Additional paid-in capital			Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income			Retained earnings		Total stockholders’ equity

Balance at January 2, 2010	$	581	$	235,330		$	(4,066	)	$	324,179	$	556,024
Exercise of stock options (1,221,003 shares)		12		8,238			--			--		8,250
Income tax benefit from exercised stock options		--		8,579			--			--		8,579
Restricted stock activity		1		(1	)		--			--		--
Stock-based compensation expense		--		3,102			--			--		3,102
Issuance of common stock (24,032 shares)		--		800			--			--		800
Comprehensive income:
Net income		--		--			--			61,921		61,921
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap agreements, net of tax of $272		--		--			463			--		463
Total comprehensive income		--		--			463			61,921		62,384
Balance at July 3, 2010	$	594	$	256,048		$	(3,603	)	$	386,100	$	639,139

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 – THE COMPANY:

Carter’s, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “its,” and “our”) design, source, and market branded childrenswear under the Carter’s, Child of Mine, Just One You (formerly Just One Year), Precious Firsts, OshKosh, and related brands. Our products are sourced through contractual arrangements with manufacturers worldwide for wholesale distribution to major domestic retailers, including the mass channel, and for our 289 Carter’s and 175 OshKosh retail stores that market our brand name merchandise and other licensed products manufactured by other companies.

NOTE 2 – BASIS OF PREPARATION:

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Carter’s, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

In our opinion, the Company’s accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position as of July 3, 2010, the results of our operations for the three and six-month periods ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, cash flows for the six-month periods ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 and changes in stockholders’ equity for the six-month period ended July 3, 2010. Operating results for the three and six-month periods ended July 3, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 1, 2011. Our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 2, 2010 is from our audited consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the instructions to Form 10-Q. The accounting policies we follow are set forth in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010.

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday, in December or January, nearest the last day of December. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 reflect our financial position as of July 3, 2010. The second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009 ended on July 4, 2009.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to facilitate comparability with current year presentation.

Subsequent events were evaluated and all appropriate disclosures are included within these financials.

NOTE 3 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:

Comprehensive income is summarized as follows:

	For the three-month periods ended				For the six-month periods ended
(dollars in thousands)	July 3, 2010		July 4, 2009		July 3, 2010		July 4, 2009

Net income	$	19,096	$	16,634	$	61,921	$	33,238
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap agreements, net of tax of $174, $85, and $272, and tax benefit of $2, respectively		297		144		463		(3	)
Settlement of interest rate collar agreement, net of tax of $216		--		--		--		407
Total comprehensive income	$	19,393	$	16,778	$	62,384	$	33,642

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 4 – LONG-TERM DEBT:

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

(dollars in thousands)	July 3, 2010			January 2, 2010
Term Loan	$	232,772		$	334,523
Current maturities		(3,503	)		(3,503	)
Total long-term debt	$	229,269		$	331,020

The Company’s Senior Credit Facility is comprised of a $500 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) and a $125 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”) (including a sub-limit for letters of credit of $80 million). The Revolver expires on July 14, 2011 and the Term Loan expires July 14, 2012. There were no borrowings outstanding under the Revolver at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively. Principal borrowings under our Term Loan are due and payable in quarterly installments of $0.6 million through June 30, 2012 with the remaining balance of $227.9 million due on July 14, 2012.

Amounts borrowed under the Term Loan have an applicable rate of LIBOR + 1.50%, regardless of the Company’s overall leverage level. Interest is payable at the end of interest rate reset periods, which vary in length but in no case exceed 12 months for LIBOR rate loans and quarterly for prime rate loans. The effective interest rates on Term Loan borrowings as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 were 1.8% and 1.7%, respectively.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company prepaid approximately $100 million in Term Loan borrowings, or approximately 30% of its outstanding debt, in addition to a regularly scheduled amortization payment of approximately $0.9 million. In addition, the Company wrote-off $0.5 million of debt issuance costs related to the prepayment of a portion of our Term Loan debt.

NOTE 5 – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

Goodwill as of July 3, 2010 represents the excess of the cost of the acquisition of Carter’s, Inc. by Berkshire Partners LLC which was consummated on August 15, 2001 over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Our goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. Our Carter’s goodwill and Carter’s and OshKosh tradenames are deemed to have indefinite lives and are not being amortized.

The Company’s intangible assets were as follows:

		July 3, 2010						January 2, 2010
(dollars in thousands)	Weighted-average useful life	Gross amount		Accumulated amortization		Net amount		Gross amount		Accumulated amortization		Net amount

Carter’s goodwill (1)	Indefinite	$	136,570	$	--	$	136,570	$	136,570	$	--	$	136,570
Carter’s tradename	Indefinite	$	220,233	$	--	$	220,233	$	220,233	$	--	$	220,233
OshKosh tradename	Indefinite	$	85,500	$	--	$	85,500	$	85,500	$	--	$	85,500
OshKosh licensing agreements	4.7 years	$	19,100	$	18,963	$	137	$	19,100	$	17,323	$	1,777
Leasehold interests	4.1 years	$	1,833	$	1,833	$	--	$	1,833	$	1,833	$	--

(1) $51.8 million of which relates to Carter’s wholesale segment, $82.0 million of which relates to Carter’s retail segment, and $2.7 million of which relates to Carter’s mass channel segment.

Amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $0.8 million for the three-month period ended July 3, 2010 and $1.0 million for the three-month period ended July 4, 2009. Amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $1.6 million and $2.0 million for the six-month periods ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009. Amortization expense for the OshKosh licensing agreements is expected to be approximately $0.1 million for the remainder of fiscal 2010.

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES:

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the United States and in various states and local jurisdictions. During fiscal 2009, the Internal Revenue Service completed an income tax audit for fiscal 2006 and 2007. In most cases, the Company is no longer subject to state and local tax authority examinations for years prior to fiscal 2006.

During the first half of fiscal 2009, we recognized approximately $1.0 million in tax benefits due to the completion of an Internal Revenue Service audit for fiscal 2006.

As of July 3, 2010, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $8.5 million. Substantially all of the Company’s reserve for unrecognized tax benefits as of July 3, 2010, if ultimately recognized, will impact the Company’s effective tax rate in the period settled. The Company has recorded tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain, but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductions. Because of deferred tax accounting, changes in the timing of these deductions would not impact the annual effective tax rate, but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authorities.

Included in the reserves for unrecognized tax benefits as of July 3, 2010, are approximately $0.6 million of reserves for which the statute of limitations is expected to expire in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. If these tax benefits are ultimately recognized, such recognition may impact our annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 and the effective tax rate in the quarter in which the benefits are recognized.

We recognize interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. During the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, the Company recognized interest expense on uncertain tax positions of approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company recognized interest expense on uncertain tax positions of approximately $0.1 million. During the first half of fiscal 2009, the Company’s recognized interest expense on uncertain tax positions was offset by a reduction in interest expense related to the successful resolution of the Internal Revenue Service audit for fiscal 2006. The Company had approximately $0.7 million and $0.6 million of interest accrued as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively.

NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:

The Company reports its fair value measurements in accordance with accounting guidance, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements is as follows:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable

Level 3 - Inputs that are unobservable (for example, cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)

The following table summarizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	July 3, 2010						January 2, 2010
(dollars in millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Assets
Investments	$	--	$	230.3	$	--	$	--	$	130.0	$	--

Liabilities
Interest rate swaps	$	--	$	0.6	$	--	$	--	$	1.3	$	--

At July 3, 2010, we had approximately $215.3 million invested in money market deposit accounts and $15.0 million invested in a Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management fund, which invests only in U.S. Treasury Bills or U.S. Treasury Notes.

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS: (Continued)

At January 2, 2010, we had approximately $130.0 million of cash invested in two Dreyfus Cash Management Funds. These funds consisted of the Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management fund ($87.9 million) which invests only in U.S. Treasury Bills or U.S. Treasury Notes and the Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management fund ($42.1 million) which invests in short-term, high quality municipal obligations that provide income exempt from federal taxes.

Our senior credit facility requires us to hedge at least 25% of our variable rate debt under this facility. The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge the risk of interest rate fluctuations. These interest rate swap agreements are designated as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments on a portion of our variable rate Term Loan debt. Our interest rate swap agreements are traded in the over-the-counter market. Fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities or determined using inputs that use as their basis readily observable market data that are actively quoted and can be validated through external sources, including third-party pricing services, brokers, and market transactions. Our interest rate swap agreements are classified as current as their terms span less than one year.

As of July 3, 2010, approximately $130.7 million of our $232.8 million of outstanding debt was hedged under interest rate swap agreements. These interest rate swap agreements mature at various times through January 2011. On July 30, 2010, an interest rate swap agreement of $30.7 million matured. As of January 2, 2010, approximately $238.9 million of our $334.5 million of outstanding debt was hedged under interest rate swap agreements. We continue to be in compliance with the 25% hedging requirement under our senior credit facility.

In fiscal 2006, the Company entered into an interest rate collar agreement which covered $100 million of our variable rate Term Loan debt and was designated as a cash flow hedge of the variable interest payments on such debt. The interest rate collar agreement matured on January 31, 2009.

The fair value of our derivative instruments in our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives

(dollars in millions)	Balance sheet location	Fair value		Balance sheet location	Fair value

July 3, 2010	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	--	Other current liabilities	$	0.6
January 2, 2010	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	--	Other current liabilities	$	1.3

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS: (Continued)

The effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements was as follows:

	For the three-month period ended July 3, 2010					For the six-month period ended July 3, 2010
(dollars in thousands)	Amount of gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on effective hedges (1)		Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense			Amount of gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on effective hedges (1)		Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense

Interest rate hedge agreements	$	297	$	(514	)	$	463	$	(1,149	)

(1) Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax of $174,000 and $272,000 for the three and six-month periods ended July 3, 2010, respectively.

	For the three-month period ended July 4, 2009					For the six-month period ended July 4, 2009
(dollars in thousands)	Amount of gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on effective hedges (1)		Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense			Amount of loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on effective hedges (1)			Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense

Interest rate hedge agreements	$	144	$	(541	)	$	(3	)	$	(1,414	)

(1) Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax of $85,000 and tax benefit of $2,000 for the three and six-month periods ended

July 4, 2009, respectively.

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 8 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:

Under a defined benefit plan frozen in 1991, we offer a comprehensive post-retirement medical plan to current and certain future retirees and their spouses until they become eligible for Medicare or a Medicare Supplement Plan. We also offer life insurance to current and certain future retirees. Employee contributions are required as a condition of participation for both medical benefits and life insurance and our liabilities are net of these expected employee contributions. See Note 7 “Employee Benefit Plans” to our audited consolidated financial statements in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

The components of post-retirement benefit expense charged to operations are as follows:

	For the three-month periods ended						For the six-month periods ended
(dollars in thousands)	July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009			July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009

Service cost – benefits attributed to service during the period	$	23		$	23		$	46		$	46
Interest cost on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation		133			113			266			226
Amortization net actuarial gain		(7	)		(7	)		(14	)		(14	)
Total net periodic post-retirement benefit cost	$	149		$	129		$	298		$	258

We have an obligation under a defined benefit plan covering certain former officers and their spouses. The component of pension expense charged to operations is as follows:

	For the three-month periods ended				For the six-month periods ended
(dollars in thousands)	July 3, 2010		July 4, 2009		July 3, 2010		July 4, 2009

Interest cost on accumulated pension benefit obligation	$	12	$	13	$	24	$	26

Under a defined benefit pension plan frozen as of December 31, 2005, certain current and former employees of OshKosh are eligible to receive benefits. The net periodic pension (benefit) expense associated with this pension plan and included in the statement of operations was comprised of:

	For the three-month periods ended						For the six-month periods ended
(dollars in thousands)	July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009			July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009

Interest cost on accumulated pension benefit obligation	$	598		$	568		$	1,196		$	1,135
Expected return on assets		(719	)		(650	)		(1,438	)		(1,300	)
Amortization of actuarial loss		33			102			67			205
Total net periodic pension (benefit) expense	$	(88	)	$	20		$	(175	)	$	40

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 9 – COMMON STOCK:

During the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, the Company issued 24,032 shares of common stock at a fair market value of $33.29 per share to its non-management board members. In connection with this issuance, we recognized approximately $800,000 in stock-based compensation expense. During the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009, the Company issued 33,656 shares of common stock at a fair market value of $20.80 per share to its non-management board members. In connection with this issuance, we recognized approximately $700,000 in stock-based compensation expense. We received no proceeds from the issuance of these shares.

On February 16, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization, pursuant to which the Company is authorized to purchase up to $100 million of its outstanding common shares. The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the three or six-month periods ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 pursuant to the Company’s share repurchase authorization. Since inception of the authorization and through July 3, 2010, the Company repurchased and retired 4,599,580 shares of its common stock at an average price of $19.81 per share, leaving approximately $8.9 million available for repurchase under the authorization. We have reduced common stock by the par value of such shares repurchased and have deducted the remaining excess repurchase price over par value from additional paid-in capital.

On June 15, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization, pursuant to which the Company is authorized to purchase up to $100 million of its outstanding common shares (in addition to the $8.9 million available for repurchases under the Company’s repurchase authorization approved in February 2007). Neither of the current share repurchase authorizations have expiration dates. Purchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, with the level and timing of activity being at the discretion of the Company’s management depending on market conditions, stock price, other investment priorities, and other factors.

NOTE 10 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:

Under our Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, the compensation committee of our Board of Directors may award incentive stock options (ISOs and non-ISOs), stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted stock, unrestricted stock, stock deliverable on a deferred basis, performance-based stock awards, and cash payments intended to help defray the cost of awards. The fair value of time-based or performance-based stock option grants are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing method with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants issued during the six-month period ended July 3, 2010.

	Assumptions

Volatility		34.60	%
Risk-free interest rate		3.08	%
Expected term (years)		7
Dividend yield		--

The fair value of restricted stock is determined based on the quoted closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 10 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION: (Continued)

The following table summarizes our stock option and restricted stock activity during the six-month period ended July 3, 2010:

	Time-based stock options			Restricted stock

Outstanding, January 2, 2010		3,512,385			449,844

Granted		394,500			176,504
Exercised		(1,221,003	)		--
Vested restricted stock		--			(86,731	)
Forfeited		(100,600	)		(36,900	)
Expired		(9,800	)		--

Outstanding, July 3, 2010		2,575,482			502,717

Exercisable, July 3, 2010		1,575,057			--

During the three-month period ended July 3, 2010, we granted 9,000 time-based stock options with a weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value of $13.92 per share and a weighted-average exercise price of $33.44 per share. In connection with this grant, we recognized approximately $4,000 in stock-based compensation expense during the three-month period ended July 3, 2010.

During the six-month period ended July 3, 2010, we granted 394,500 time-based stock options with a weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value of $11.94 per share and a weighted-average exercise price of $28.16 per share. In connection with these grants, we recognized approximately $410,000 in stock-based compensation expense during the six-month period ended July 3, 2010.

During the three-month period ended July 3, 2010, we granted 7,504 shares of restricted stock to employees and a director with a weighted-average fair value on the date of grant of $33.38 per share. In connection with these grants, we recognized approximately $9,000 in stock-based compensation expense during the three-month period ended July 3, 2010.

During the six-month period ended July 3, 2010, we granted 176,504 shares of restricted stock to employees and a director with a weighted-average fair value on the date of grant of $28.27 per share. In connection with these grants, we recognized approximately $430,000 in stock-based compensation expense during the six-month period ended July 3, 2010.

Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to outstanding unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock awards is expected to be recorded as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	Time-based stock options		Restricted Stock		Total

2010 (period from July 4 through January 1, 2011)	$	1,496	$	1,710	$	3,206
2011		2,695		3,066		5,761
2012		2,079		2,347		4,426
2013		1,243		1,330		2,573
Total	$	7,513	$	8,453	$	15,966

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 11 – SEGMENT INFORMATION:

We report segment information in accordance with accounting guidance on segment reporting, which requires segment information to be disclosed based upon a “management approach.” The management approach refers to the internal reporting that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing the performance of our reportable segments. We report our corporate expenses, workforce reduction, and facility write-down and closure costs separately as they are not included in the internal measures of segment operating performance used by the Company in order to measure the underlying performance of our reportable segments.

The table below presents certain segment information for the periods indicated:

	For the three-month periods ended												For the six-month periods ended
(dollars in thousands)	July 3, 2010			% of Total			July 4, 2009			% of Total			July 3, 2010			% of Total			July 4, 2009			% of Total
Net sales:

Carter’s:
Wholesale	$	111,248			34.0	%	$	108,061			33.1	%	$	257,506			35.0	%	$	229,878			33.6	%
Retail (a)		113,593			34.7	%		110,127			33.7	%		231,732			31.5	%		212,057			31.0	%
Mass Channel		38,838			11.9	%		44,283			13.6	%		106,758			14.5	%		103,106			15.1	%
Carter’s total net sales		263,679			80.6	%		262,471			80.4	%		595,996			81.0	%		545,041			79.7	%

OshKosh:
Retail (a)		51,959			15.9	%		52,160			16.0	%		107,104			14.5	%		103,988			15.2	%
Wholesale		11,371			3.5	%		11,698			3.6	%		32,958			4.5	%		34,462			5.1	%
OshKosh total net sales		63,330			19.4	%		63,858			19.6	%		140,062			19.0	%		138,450			20.3	%

Total net sales	$	327,009			100.0	%	$	326,329			100.0	%	$	736,058			100.0	%	$	683,491			100.0	%

Operating income (loss):				% of segment net sales						% of segment net sales						% of segment net sales						% of segment net sales

Carter’s:
Wholesale	$	23,341			21.0	%	$	20,325			18.8	%	$	63,639			24.7	%	$	43,424			18.9	%
Retail (a)		18,683			16.4	%		16,575			15.1	%		44,826			19.3	%		33,163			15.6	%
Mass Channel		6,856			17.7	%		8,706			19.7	%		19,650			18.4	%		16,819			16.3	%

Carter’s operating income		48,880			18.5	%		45,606			17.4	%		128,115			21.5	%		93,406			17.1	%

OshKosh:
Retail (a)		(909	)		(1.7	%)		786			1.5	%		1,054			1.0	%		455			0.4	%
Wholesale		(2,363	)		(20.8	%)		(1,938	)		(16.6	%)		1,230			3.7	%		(517	)		(1.5	%)
Mass Channel (b)		474			--			438			--			1,239			--			1,144			--

OshKosh operating (loss) income		(2,798	)		(4.4	%)		(714	)		(1.1	%)		3,523			2.5	%		1,082			0.8	%

Segment operating income		46,082			14.1	%		44,892			13.8	%		131,638			17.9	%		94,488			13.8	%

Corporate expenses (c)		(12,659	)		(3.9	%)		(11,910	)		(3.6	%)		(27,046	)		(3.7	%)		(23,830	)		(3.5	%)
Workforce reduction and facility write-down and closure costs (d)		--			--			(3,623	)		(1.1	%)		--			--			(12,365	)		(1.8	%)

Net corporate expenses		(12,659	)		(3.9	%)		(15,533	)		(4.8	%)		(27,046	)		(3.7	%)		(36,195	)		(5.3	%)

Total operating income	$	33,423			10.2	%	$	29,359			9.0	%	$	104,592			14.2	%	$	58,293			8.5	%

(a)	Includes eCommerce results.

(b)	OshKosh mass channel consists of a licensing agreement with Target Stores. Operating income consists of royalty income, net of related expenses.

(c)	Corporate expenses generally include expenses related to incentive compensation, stock-based compensation, executive management, severance and relocation, finance, building occupancy, information technology, certain legal fees, consulting, and audit fees.

(d)	Includes closure costs associated with our Barnesville, Georgia distribution facility and our Oshkosh, Wisconsin facility, write-down of the White House, Tennessee facility, and severance and other benefits related to the corporate workforce reduction.

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 12 – WORKFORCE REDUCTION AND FACILITY CLOSURE COSTS:

Corporate Workforce Reduction

On April 21, 2009, the Company announced to affected employees a plan to reduce its corporate workforce (defined as excluding retail district managers, hourly retail store employees, and distribution center employees). Approximately 150 employees were affected under the plan. The plan included consolidating the majority of our operations performed in our Oshkosh, Wisconsin office into other Company locations. This consolidation has resulted in the addition of resources in our other locations.

As a result of this corporate workforce reduction, we recorded severance charges and other one-time benefits to eligible employees of $2.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. During the first half of fiscal 2009, we recorded charges of $7.3 million consisting of $5.5 million in severance charges and other benefits, and approximately $1.8 million in asset impairment charges related to the closure of our Oshkosh, Wisconsin office. The majority of the remaining severance payments will be paid by the end of fiscal 2010.

The following table summarizes restructuring reserves related to the corporate workforce reduction which are included in other current liabilities on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet:

(dollars in thousands)	Severance and other one-time benefits

Balance at April 4, 2009	$	3,300
Provision		2,200
Payments		(900	)
Balance at July 4, 2009		4,600
Provision		--
Payments		(1,300	)
Balance at October 3, 2009		3,300
Provision		--
Payments		(800	)
Balance at January 2, 2010		2,500
Provision		--
Payments		(1,000	)
Balance at April 3, 2010		1,500
Provision		--
Payments		(600	)
Balance at July 3, 2010	$	900

Barnesville Distribution Facility Closure

On April 2, 2009, the Company announced to affected employees a plan to close its Barnesville, Georgia distribution center. Approximately 210 employees were affected by this closure. Operations at the Barnesville facility ceased on June 1, 2009.

In accordance with accounting guidance on accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, under a held and used model, it was determined that the distribution facility assets became impaired during March 2009, when it became “more likely than not” that the expected life of the Barnesville, Georgia distribution facility would be significantly shortened. Accordingly, we wrote down the assets to their estimated recoverable fair value in March 2009. The adjusted asset values were subject to accelerated depreciation over their remaining estimated useful life.

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 12 – WORKFORCE REDUCTION AND FACILITY CLOSURE COSTS: (Continued)

In conjunction with the plan to close the Barnesville, Georgia distribution center, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation charges (included in selling, general, and administrative expenses) of approximately $0.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and charges of $4.3 million during the first half of fiscal 2009, consisting of severance of $1.7 million, asset impairment charges of $1.1 million related to the write-down of the related land, building, and equipment, $1.0 million of accelerated depreciation (included in selling, general, and administrative expenses), and $0.5 million of other closure costs.

The following table summarizes restructuring reserves related to the closure of the Barnesville, Georgia distribution center which are included in other current liabilities on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet:

(dollars in thousands)	Severance			Other closure costs			Total

Balance at April 4, 2009	$	1,700		$	500		$	2,200
Provision		--			--			--
Payments		(700	)		--			(700	)
Balance at July 4, 2009		1,000			500			1,500
Provision		--			--			--
Payments		(500	)		--			(500	)
Adjustments		(400	)		--			(400	)
Balance at October 3, 2009		100			500			600
Provision		--			--			--
Payments		(50	)		--			(50	)
Balance at January 2, 2010		50			500			550
Provision		--			--			--
Payments		--			--			--
Balance at April 3, 2010		50			500			550
Provision		--			--			--
Payments		--			(50	)		(50	)
Balance at July 3, 2010	$	50		$	450		$	500

White House Distribution Facility

During the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009, the Company wrote down the carrying value of its White House, Tennessee distribution facility by approximately $0.7 million to $2.8 million to reflect the decrease in the fair market value of the facility at that time. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company sold the facility for net proceeds of approximately $2.8 million.

NOTE 13 – EARNINGS PER SHARE:

The Company calculates basic and diluted net income per common share in accordance with accounting guidance which requires earnings per share to be calculated pursuant to the two-class method for unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid).

Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income for the period by the weighted-average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share includes the effect of dilutive instruments, such as stock options and restricted stock, and uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of shares that are to be added to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding.

CARTER’S, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 13 – EARNINGS PER SHARE: (Continued)

The following is a reconciliation of basic common shares outstanding to diluted common and common equivalent shares outstanding:

	For the three-month periods ended						For the six-month periods ended
	July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009			July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009

Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
Basic number of common shares outstanding		58,907,191			56,220,522			58,607,261			56,089,674
Dilutive effect of unvested restricted stock		118,416			122,781			119,227			116,583
Dilutive effect of stock options		760,254			1,787,646			864,836			1,727,956
Diluted number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding		59,785,861			58,130,949			59,591,324			57,934,213

Basic net income per common share:
Net income	$	19,096,000		$	16,634,000		$	61,921,000		$	33,238,000
Income allocated to participating securities		(161,587	)		(137,414	)		(526,624	)		(275,215	)
Net income available to common shareholders	$	18,934,413		$	16,496,586		$	61,394,376		$	32,962,785

Basic net income per common share	$	0.32		$	0.29		$	1.05		$	0.59

Diluted net income per common share:
Net income	$	19,096,000		$	16,634,000		$	61,921,000		$	33,238,000
Income allocated to participating securities		(159,546	)		(133,213	)		(519,030	)		(267,056	)
Net income available to common shareholders	$	18,936,454		$	16,500,787		$	61,401,970		$	32,970,944

Diluted net income per common share	$	0.32		$	0.28		$	1.03		$	0.57

For the three and six-month periods ended July 3, 2010, anti-dilutive shares of 585,400 and 588,404, respectively, were excluded from the computations of diluted earnings per share. For the three and six-month periods ended July 4, 2009, anti-dilutive shares of 1,166,050 and 1,290,050, respectively, and performance-based stock options of 200,000, were excluded from the computations of diluted earnings per share.

NOTE 14 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued guidance to amend the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance requires new disclosures on the transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 (quoted prices in active market for identical assets or liabilities) and Level 2 (significant other observable inputs) of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the timing of the transfers. Additionally, the guidance requires a roll forward of activities on purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements of the assets and liabilities measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value measurements). The guidance became effective for the Company with the reporting period beginning January 3, 2010, except for the disclosure on the roll forward activities for Level 3 fair value measurements, which will become effective for the Company with the reporting period beginning January 1, 2011. Other than requiring additional disclosures, adoption of this new guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2010, new accounting guidance was issued related to subsequent events. This guidance amended guidance previously issued in May 2009 regarding subsequent events and states that an entity that is a SEC filer is no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:

The following is a discussion of our results of operations and current financial position. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated (i) selected statement of operations data expressed as a percentage of net sales and (ii) the number of retail stores open at the end of each period:

	Three-month periods ended						Six-month periods ended
	July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009			July 3, 2010			July 4, 2009

Wholesale sales:
Carter’s		34.0	%		33.1	%		35.0	%		33.6	%
OshKosh		3.5			3.6			4.5			5.1
Total wholesale sales		37.5			36.7			39.5			38.7

Retail store sales:
Carter’s		34.7			33.7			31.5			31.0
OshKosh		15.9			16.0			14.5			15.2
Total retail store sales		50.6			49.7			46.0			46.2

Mass channel sales		11.9			13.6			14.5			15.1

Consolidated net sales		100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0
Cost of goods sold		60.2			61.8			59.6			63.1

Gross profit		39.8			38.2			40.4			36.9
Selling, general, and administrative expenses		31.9			30.6			28.5			29.1
Workforce reduction and facility write-down and closure costs		--			0.9			--			1.7
Royalty income		(2.3	)		(2.3	)		(2.3	)		(2.4	)

Operating income		10.2			9.0			14.2			8.5
Interest expense, net		0.8			0.8			0.7			0.8

Income before income taxes		9.4			8.2			13.5			7.7
Provision for income taxes		3.6			3.1			5.1			2.8

Net income		5.8	%		5.1	%		8.4	%		4.9	%

Number of retail stores at end of period:
Carter’s		289			271			289			271
OshKosh		175			168			175			168
Total		464			439			464			439

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

Three and six-month periods ended July 3, 2010 compared to the three and six-month periods ended July 4, 2009

CONSOLIDATED NET SALES

In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, consolidated net sales of $327.0 million were comparable with the prior year and reflects growth in our Carter’s brand retail store and wholesale segments, almost entirely offset by declines in our Carter’s brand mass channel segment and OshKosh brand wholesale and retail store segments. In the first half of fiscal 2010, consolidated net sales increased $52.6 million, or 7.7%, to $736.1 million and reflect growth in all channels except our OshKosh brand wholesale segment.

	For the three-month periods ended										For the six-month periods ended
(dollars in thousands)	July 3, 2010		% of Total			July 4, 2009		% of Total			July 3, 2010		% of Total			July 4, 2009		% of Total

Net sales:
Wholesale-Carter’s	$	111,248		34.0	%	$	108,061		33.1	%	$	257,506		35.0	%	$	229,878		33.6	%
Wholesale-OshKosh		11,371		3.5	%		11,698		3.6	%		32,958		4.5	%		34,462		5.1	%
Retail-Carter’s		113,593		34.7	%		110,127		33.7	%		231,732		31.5	%		212,057		31.0	%
Retail-OshKosh		51,959		15.9	%		52,160		16.0	%		107,104		14.5	%		103,988		15.2	%
Mass Channel-Carter’s		38,838		11.9	%		44,283		13.6	%		106,758		14.5	%		103,106		15.1	%
Total net sales	$	327,009		100.0	%	$	326,329		100.0	%	$	736,058		100.0	%	$	683,491		100.0	%

CARTER’S WHOLESALE SALES

Carter’s brand wholesale sales increased $3.2 million, or 2.9%, in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to $111.2 million. The increase in Carter’s brand wholesale sales was driven primarily by a 3% increase in average price per unit, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Units shipped were comparable with the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

Carter’s brand wholesale sales increased $27.6 million, or 12.0%, in the first half of fiscal 2010 to $257.5 million. The increase in Carter’s brand wholesale sales was driven primarily by a 9% increase in units shipped and a 3% increase in average price per unit, as compared to the first half of fiscal 2009.

The increase in average price per unit during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 and growth in units shipped during the first half of fiscal 2010 was driven by strong over-the-counter performance at our wholesale customers, as compared to the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009.

OSHKOSH WHOLESALE SALES

OshKosh brand wholesale sales decreased $0.3 million, or 2.8%, in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to $11.4 million. The decrease in OshKosh brand wholesale sales reflects an 11% decrease in units shipped, partially offset by a 9% increase in average price per unit as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

OshKosh brand wholesale sales decreased $1.5 million, or 4.4%, in the first half of fiscal 2010 to $33.0 million. The decrease in OshKosh brand wholesale sales reflects a 10% decrease in units shipped, partially offset by a 6% increase in average price per unit as compared to the first half of fiscal 2009.

The decrease in units shipped relates primarily to a reduction in off-price shipments. The increase in average price per unit primarily reflects higher average selling prices on off-price sales as compared to the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

MASS CHANNEL SALES

Mass channel sales decreased $5.4 million, or 12.3%, in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to $38.8 million. The decrease reflects a $10.1 million, or 47.4%, decrease in sales of our Child of Mine brand to Walmart, offset by a $4.6 million, or 20.1%, increase in sales of our Just One You (formerly Just One Year) brand to Target. Mass channel sales increased $3.7 million, or 3.5%, in the first half of fiscal 2010 to $106.8 million. The increase was driven by an $11.2 million, or 22.5%, increase in sales of our Just One You brand to Target, offset by a $7.5 million, or 14.0%, decrease in sales of our Child of Mine brand to Walmart.

The increases in both periods in Just One You brand sales were driven largely by the addition of new programs and improved product performance. The decreases in both periods in Child of Mine brand sales were due to merchandising assortment changes made by Walmart and a related reduction in floor space. In addition, during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, the reduction in floor space at Walmart was partially offset by favorable timing of shipments resulting from earlier than planned demand.

CARTER’S RETAIL STORES

Carter’s retail store sales increased $3.5 million, or 3.1%, in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to $113.6 million. The increase was driven by incremental sales of $8.4 million generated by new store openings and our eCommerce sales, partially offset by a comparable store sales decrease of 4.3%, or $4.6 million, and the impact of store closings of approximately $0.5 million. On a comparable store basis, transactions decreased 4.7%, while units per transaction and average prices were flat, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Contributing to the decrease in transactions were the shift of the Easter holiday into the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and reduced traffic at our stores. In addition, year-over-year average inventory per door was down 4.7%.

Carter’s retail store sales increased $19.7 million, or 9.3%, in the first half of fiscal 2010 to $231.7 million. The increase was driven by incremental sales of $16.8 million generated by new store openings and our eCommerce sales, a comparable store sales increase of 1.7%, or $3.5 million, partially offset by the impact of store closings of approximately $0.6 million. On a comparable store basis, average transaction value increased 2.8%, units per transaction increased 1.4%, average prices increased 1.4%, and transactions decreased 1.1%, as compared to the first half of fiscal 2009. The increases in average transaction value and units per transaction were driven by strong product performance in all product categories, improved in-store product presentation, and increased merchandising and marketing efforts. The increase in average prices was driven primarily by the strong performance of our baby, playwear, and accessories product categories.

The Company’s comparable store sales calculations include sales for all stores that were open during the comparable fiscal period, including remodeled stores and certain relocated stores. If a store relocates within the same center with no business interruption or material change in square footage, the sales of such store will continue to be included in the comparable store calculation. If a store relocates to another center, or there is a material change in square footage, such store is treated as a new store. Stores that are closed during the period are included in the comparable store sales calculation up to the date of closing.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company opened eight Carter’s retail stores. During the first half of fiscal 2010, the Company opened 13 Carter’s retail stores. There were a total of 289 Carter’s retail stores as of July 3, 2010. In total, the Company plans to open 30 and close five Carter’s retail stores during fiscal 2010.

OSHKOSH RETAIL STORES

OshKosh retail store sales decreased $0.2 million, or 0.4%, in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to $52.0 million. The decrease reflects a comparable store sales decrease of 4.9%, or $2.5 million, and the impact of store closings of $0.7 million, partially offset by incremental sales of $3.0 million generated by new store openings and our eCommerce sales. On a comparable store basis, transactions decreased 5.1%, units per transaction increased 1.5%, and average prices decreased 1.2%. The decrease in transactions is attributed to reduced traffic at our stores, which was partially offset by an increase in units per transaction due to strong product performance. In addition, year-over-year average inventory per door was down 12.3%.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

OshKosh retail store sales increased $3.1 million, or 3.0%, in the first half of fiscal 2010 to $107.1 million. The increase reflects incremental sales of $4.8 million generated by new store openings and our eCommerce sales, partially offset by the impact of store closings of $0.9 million and a comparable store sales decrease of 0.7%, or $0.7 million. On a comparable store basis, units per transaction increased 4.0%, transactions decreased 2.7%, and average prices decreased 1.8%. The decrease in transactions is attributed to reduced traffic at our stores, which was partially offset by an increase in units per transaction due to strong product performance, in-store product presentation, and direct-to-consumer marketing efforts.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company opened three OshKosh retail stores. During the first half of fiscal 2010, the Company opened five OshKosh retail stores. There were a total of 175 OshKosh retail stores as of July 3, 2010. In total, the Company plans to open 13 and close three OshKosh retail stores during fiscal 2010.

GROSS PROFIT

Gross profit increased $5.5 million, or 4.4%, to $130.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 39.8% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as compared to 38.2% in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Gross profit increased $44.6 million, or 17.7%, to $297.1 million in the first half of fiscal 2010. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 40.4% in the first half of fiscal 2010 as compared to 36.9% in the first half of fiscal 2009.

The increases in gross profit as a percentage of net sales reflect:

·	$5.4 million and $10.7 million related to higher consolidated retail gross margins as a percentage of consolidated retail sales during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively; and

·	$13.3 million related to growth in Carter’s wholesale and mass channel margins due to increased volume and improved product performance during the first half of fiscal 2010.

The Company includes distribution costs in its selling, general, and administrative expenses. Accordingly, the Company’s gross profit may not be comparable to other companies that include such distribution costs in their cost of goods sold.

SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Selling, general, and administrative expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 increased $4.6 million, or 4.6%, to $104.5 million. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general, and administrative expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 increased to 31.9% as compared to 30.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales reflects:

·	an increase in our consolidated retail expenses from 33.4% of retail store sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 to 35.8% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily due to a decline in comparable store sales;

·	a $2.4 million increase in legal expenses primarily associated with the accommodations issues; and

·	$1.7 million of incremental costs related to eCommerce which was launched in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

Partially offsetting these increases was a $2.5 million decrease in performance-based incentives.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

Selling, general, and administrative expenses in the first half of fiscal 2010 increased $10.8 million, or 5.4%, to $209.8 million. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general, and administrative expenses in the first half of fiscal 2010 decreased to 28.5% as compared to 29.1% in the first half of fiscal 2009.

The decrease in selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales reflects:

·	a decline in distribution costs as a percentage of net sales from 3.7% in the first half of fiscal 2009 to 3.4% in the first half of fiscal 2010 resulting from supply chain efficiencies;

·	a $1.2 million decrease in provisions for performance-based incentives; and

·	reduced discretionary spending and increased overall focus on our cost structure.

Partially offsetting these decreases were:

·	an increase in our consolidated retail expenses from 33.7% of retail store sales in the first half of fiscal 2009 to 34.1% in the first half of fiscal 2010;

·	$2.6 million of incremental expenses associated with eCommerce; and

·	a $2.1 million increase in legal expenses primarily associated with the accommodations issues.

WORKFORCE REDUCTION AND FACILITY CLOSURE COSTS

As a result of the corporate workforce reduction, we recorded severance charges and other one-time benefits to eligible employees of $2.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. During the first half of fiscal 2009, we recorded charges of $7.3 million consisting of $5.5 million in severance charges and other benefits, and approximately $1.8 million in asset impairment charges related to the closure of our Oshkosh, Wisconsin corporate office. The majority of the remaining severance payments will be paid by the end of fiscal 2010.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company wrote down the carrying value of its White House, Tennessee distribution facility by approximately $0.7 million to $2.8 million to reflect the decrease in the fair market value of the facility at that time. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company sold the facility for net proceeds of approximately $2.8 million.

ROYALTY INCOME

We license the use of our Carter’s, Just One You (formerly Just One Year), Child of Mine, OshKosh B’gosh, OshKosh, and Genuine Kids from OshKosh brand names. Royalty income from these brands in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was approximately $7.6 million (including $2.1 million of international royalty income), an increase of $0.2 million, or 2.2%, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Royalty income from these brands in the first half of fiscal 2010 was approximately $17.3 million (including $4.3 million of international royalty income), an increase of 6.5%, or $1.1 million, as compared to the first half of fiscal 2009. These increases for both periods were driven by increased sales by our Carter’s brand domestic and international licensees and OshKosh brand domestic licensees, partially offset by decreased Child of Mine brand sales.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

OPERATING INCOME

Operating income increased $4.1 million, or 13.8%, to $33.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Operating income increased $46.3 million, or 79.4%, to $104.6 million in the first half of fiscal 2010. The increases in operating income were due to the factors described above.

INTEREST EXPENSE, NET

Interest expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 decreased $0.1 million, or 1.7%, to $2.7 million. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower weighted-average borrowings, partially offset by a $0.5 million write-off of debt issuance costs related to the prepayment of a portion of our Term Loan debt. Weighted-average borrowings in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were $330.3 million at an effective interest rate of 3.56% as compared to weighted-average borrowings in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 of $337.1 million at an effective interest rate of 3.31%. In the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009, we recorded $0.5 million in interest expense related to our interest rate swap agreements.

Interest expense in the first half of fiscal 2010 decreased $0.8 million, or 13.2%, to $5.1 million. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower weighted-average borrowings and a lower effective interest rate, partially offset by a $0.5 million write-off of debt issuance costs related to the prepayment of a portion of our Term Loan debt. Weighted-average borrowings in the first half of fiscal 2010 were $332.4 million at an effective interest rate of 3.30% as compared to weighted-average borrowings in the first half of fiscal 2009 of $337.5 million at an effective interest rate of 3.59%. In the first half of fiscal 2010, we recorded $1.1 million in interest expense related to our interest rate swap agreements. In the first half of fiscal 2009, we recorded $0.9 million in interest expense related to our interest rate swap agreements and $0.5 million in interest expense related to our interest rate collar agreement.

INCOME TAXES

Our effective tax rate was 37.9% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and 37.6% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

Our effective tax rate was 37.8% for the first half of fiscal 2010 and 36.6% for the first half of fiscal 2009. This change was a result of the reversal of $1.0 million related to the completion of an Internal Revenue Service examination for fiscal 2006 in the first half of fiscal 2009.

NET INCOME

As a result of the factors described above, our net income for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 increased $2.5 million, or 14.8%, to $19.1 million as compared to $16.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Our net income for the first half of fiscal 2010 increased $28.7 million, or 86.3%, to $61.9 million as compared to $33.2 million in the first half of fiscal 2009.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

FINANCIAL CONDITION, CAPITAL RESOURCES, AND LIQUIDITY

Our primary cash needs are working capital and capital expenditures. Our primary source of liquidity will continue to be cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash flow from operations, and the availability of borrowings under our revolver, and we expect that these sources will fund our ongoing requirements for working capital and capital expenditures. These sources of liquidity may be impacted by events described in our risk factors, as further discussed in Part II, Item 1A of this filing.

Net accounts receivable at July 3, 2010 were $99.5 million compared to $85.1 million at July 4, 2009 and $82.1 million at January 2, 2010. The increase as compared to July 4, 2009 primarily reflects increased wholesale sales in the latter part of the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Due to the seasonal nature of our operations, the net accounts receivable balance at July 3, 2010 is not comparable to the net accounts receivable balance at January 2, 2010.

Net inventories at July 3, 2010 were $260.7 million compared to $256.2 million at July 4, 2009 and $214.0 million at January 2, 2010. The increase of $4.5 million, or 1.8%, as compared to July 4, 2009 is primarily due to a decrease in inventory reserves driven by lower levels of excess inventory. Due to the seasonal nature of our operations, net inventories at July 3, 2010 are not comparable to net inventories at January 2, 2010.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the first half of fiscal 2010 was $15.3 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $29.2 million in the first half of fiscal 2009. The decrease in operating cash flow primarily reflects changes in net working capital partially offset by increased earnings.

We invested $20.7 million in capital expenditures during the first half of fiscal 2010 compared to $18.0 million during the first half of fiscal 2009. We plan to invest approximately $45 million in capital expenditures during fiscal 2010, primarily for retail store openings and remodelings and fixtures for our wholesale customers.

On February 16, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization, pursuant to which the Company is authorized to purchase up to $100 million of its outstanding common shares. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company did not repurchase any of its common stock. Since inception of the authorization and through July 3, 2010, the Company repurchased and retired 4,599,580 shares, or approximately $91.1 million, of its common stock at an average price of $19.81 per share, leaving approximately $8.9 million available for repurchase under the authorization.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company repaid $100 million in Term Loan borrowings, in addition to a regularly scheduled amortization payment of approximately $0.9 million.

At July 3, 2010, we had approximately $232.8 million in Term Loan borrowings and no borrowings outstanding under our revolver, exclusive of approximately $8.6 million of outstanding letters of credit. Principal borrowings under our Term Loan are due and payable in quarterly installments of $0.6 million through June 30, 2012 with the remaining balance of $227.9 million due on July 14, 2012. Weighted-average borrowings in first half of fiscal 2010 were $332.4 million at an effective interest rate of 3.30% as compared to weighted-average borrowings in the first half of fiscal 2009 of $337.5 million at an effective interest rate of 3.59%.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

The senior credit facility contains and defines financial covenants, including a minimum interest coverage ratio of 4.00 to 1.00, maximum leverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00, and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 2.00 to 1.00, as of July 3, 2010. The Company’s actual interest coverage ratio, leverage ratio, and fixed charge coverage ratio as of July 3, 2010 are 29.52 to 1.00, 0.84 to 1.00, and 12.03 to 1.00, respectively. As of July 3, 2010, the Company believes it was in compliance with its debt covenants.

The senior credit facility also sets forth mandatory and optional prepayment conditions, including an annual excess cash flow requirement, as defined, that may result in our use of cash to reduce our debt obligations. There was no excess cash flow payment required for fiscal 2009 or 2008. Our obligations under the senior credit facility are collateralized by a first priority lien on substantially all of our assets, including the assets of our domestic subsidiaries.

Our senior credit facility requires us to hedge at least 25% of our variable rate debt under this facility using interest rate swaps or other similar instruments. As of July 3, 2010, $130.7 million, or 56.2%, of our senior credit facility borrowings were subject to interest rate swap agreements.

Our operating results are subject to risk from interest rate fluctuations on our senior credit facility, which carries variable interest rates. As of July 3, 2010, our outstanding debt aggregated approximately $232.8 million, of which $102.1 million, or 43.8%, was subject to variable interest rates. An increase or decrease of 1% in the applicable rate would increase or decrease our annual interest cost by approximately $1.0 million, exclusive of variable rate debt subject to our swap agreements, and could have an adverse effect on our earnings and cash flow.

Based on our current outlook, we believe that cash generated from operations and available cash, together with amounts available under our revolver, will be adequate to meet our working capital needs and capital expenditure requirements for the foreseeable future, although no assurance can be given in this regard. We may, however, need to refinance all or a portion of the principal amount, if any, outstanding under our revolver on or before July 14, 2011 and amounts outstanding under our Term Loan on or before July 14, 2012.

The continuing volatility in the financial markets and the related economic downturn in markets throughout the world could have a material adverse effect on our business. While we currently generate significant cash flows from our ongoing operations and have access to credit through amounts available under our revolver, credit markets have recently experienced significant disruptions and certain leading financial institutions have either declared bankruptcy or have shown significant deterioration in their financial stability. Further deterioration in the financial markets could make future financing difficult or more expensive. If any of the financial institutions that are parties to our revolver were to declare bankruptcy or become insolvent, they may be unable to perform under their agreements with us. This could leave us with reduced borrowing capacity. In addition, tighter credit markets may lead to business disruptions for certain of our suppliers, contract manufacturers or trade customers and consequently, could disrupt our business.

EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND DEFLATION; OPERATING COSTS

We are affected by inflation and changing prices primarily through purchasing product from our global suppliers, increased operating costs and expenses, and fluctuations in interest rates. The effects of inflation on our net sales and operations have not been material in recent years. In recent years, there has been deflationary pressure on selling prices. If deflationary price trends outpace our ability to reduce our manufacturing and supply chain costs, or otherwise lower our overall cost structure, our profitability may be affected. We anticipate increases in the costs of production for our vendors over the next year, including increases in cotton prices and labor rates, as well as increasing transportation costs. We are also anticipating appreciation in Asian currencies. All of these increases and currency appreciation may impact our costs of goods sold. If we are unable to absorb these price increases by reducing our manufacturing or supply chain costs or lowering our overall cost structure, or if our ability to effectively raise prices is limited, our profitability may be affected.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

SEASONALITY

We experience seasonal fluctuations in our sales and profitability due to the timing of certain holidays and key retail shopping periods, generally resulting in lower sales and gross profit in the first half of our fiscal year. Over the past five fiscal years, excluding the impact of our acquisition of OshKosh B’Gosh, Inc. in fiscal 2005, approximately 57% of our consolidated net sales were generated in the second half of our fiscal year. Accordingly, our results of operations during the first half of the year may not be indicative of the results we expect for the full year.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements contained in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion addresses our critical accounting policies and estimates, which are those policies that require management’s most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Revenue recognition: We recognize wholesale and mass channel revenue after shipment of products to customers, when title passes, when all risks and rewards of ownership have transferred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In certain cases, in which we retain the risk of loss during shipment, revenue recognition does not occur until the goods have reached the specified customer. In the normal course of business, we grant certain accommodations and allowances to our wholesale and mass channel customers in order to assist these customers with inventory clearance or promotions. Such amounts are reflected as a reduction of net sales and are recorded based upon agreements with customers, historical trends, and annual forecasts. Retail store revenues are recognized at the point of sale. We reduce revenue for estimated customer returns and deductions. We also maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make payments and other actual and estimated deductions. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, an additional allowance could be required. Past due balances over 90 days are reviewed individually for collectibility. Our credit and collections department reviews all other balances regularly. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when we believe it is probable the receivable will not be recovered.

We contract with a third-party service to provide us with the fair value of cooperative advertising arrangements entered into with certain of our major wholesale and mass channel customers. Such fair value is determined based upon, among other factors, comparable market analysis for similar advertisements. In accordance with accounting guidance on consideration given by a vendor to a customer/reseller, we have included the fair value of these arrangements of approximately $1.2 million and $1.7 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively, and $0.8 million and $1.6 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009, respectively, as a component of selling, general, and administrative expenses on the accompanying audited consolidated statement of operations rather than as a reduction of revenue. Amounts determined to be in excess of the fair value of these arrangements are recorded as a reduction of net sales.

Inventory: We provide reserves for slow-moving inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those we project, additional write-downs may be required.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

Goodwill and tradename: As of July 3, 2010, we had approximately $136.6 million in Carter’s goodwill and $305.7 million of aggregate value related to the Carter’s and OshKosh tradename assets. The fair value of the Carter’s tradename was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis at the time of the acquisition of Carter’s, Inc. by Berkshire Partners LLC which was consummated on August 15, 2001. The particular discounted cash flow approach utilized the hypothetical cost savings that accrue as a result of our ownership of the tradename. The fair value of the OshKosh tradename was also estimated at its acquisition date using an identical discounted cash flow analysis. The Carter’s and OshKosh tradenames were determined to have indefinite lives.

The carrying values of the goodwill and tradename assets are subject to annual impairment reviews in accordance with accounting guidance on goodwill and other intangible assets, as of the last day of each fiscal year. Impairment reviews may also be triggered by any significant events or changes in circumstances affecting our business. Factors affecting such impairment reviews include the continued market acceptance of our offered products and the development of new products. We use discounted cash flow models to determine the fair value of these assets, using assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participants would use. For indefinite-lived intangible assets, if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount equal to that excess.

We perform impairment tests of our goodwill at our reporting unit level, which is consistent with our operating segments. The goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if necessary. The first step is to compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. We use discounted cash flow models to determine the fair value of a reporting unit. The assumptions used in these models are consistent with those we believe hypothetical marketplace participants would use. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the second step of the impairment test must be performed in order to determine the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.

A deterioration of macroeconomic conditions may not only negatively impact the estimated operating cash flows used in our cash flow models, but may also negatively impact other assumptions used in our analyses, including, but not limited to, the estimated cost of capital and/or discount rates. Additionally, as discussed above, in accordance with accounting guidance, we are required to ensure that assumptions used to determine fair value in our analyses are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use. As a result, the cost of capital and/or discount rates used in our analyses may increase or decrease based on market conditions and trends, regardless of whether our actual cost of capital has changed. Therefore, we may recognize an impairment of an intangible asset or assets even though realized actual cash flows are approximately equal to or greater than our previously forecasted amounts.

Accrued expenses: Accrued expenses for workers’ compensation, incentive compensation, health insurance, and other outstanding obligations are assessed based on actual commitments, statistical trends, and estimates based on projections and current expectations, and these estimates are updated periodically as additional information becomes available.

Loss contingencies: We record accruals for various contingencies including legal exposures as they arise in the normal course of business. In accordance with accounting guidance on contingencies, we determine whether to disclose and accrue for loss contingencies based on an assessment of whether the risk of loss is remote, reasonably possible or probable. Our assessment is developed in consultation with our internal and external counsel and other advisors and is based on an analysis of possible outcomes under various strategies. Loss contingency assumptions involve judgments that are inherently subjective and can involve matters that are in litigation, which, by its nature is unpredictable. We believe that our assessment of the probability of loss contingencies is reasonable, but because of the subjectivity involved and the unpredictable nature of the subject matter at issue, our assessment may prove ultimately to be incorrect, which could materially impact our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

Accounting for income taxes: As part of the process of preparing the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our actual current tax exposure (state, federal, and foreign). We assess our income tax positions and record tax benefits for all years subject to examination based upon management’s evaluation of the facts, circumstances, and information available at the reporting dates. For those uncertain tax positions where it is “more likely than not” that a tax benefit will be sustained, we have recorded the largest amount of tax benefit with a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. For those income tax positions where it is not “more likely than not” that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit has been recognized in the financial statements. Where applicable, associated interest is also recognized. We also assess permanent and temporary differences resulting from differing bases and treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes, such as the carrying value of intangibles, deductibility of expenses, depreciation of property, plant, and equipment, stock-based compensation expense, and valuation of inventories. Temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. Actual results could differ from this assessment if sufficient taxable income is not generated in future periods. To the extent we determine the need to establish a valuation allowance or increase such allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Employee benefit plans: We sponsor a defined contribution plan, a frozen defined benefit pension plan and other unfunded post-retirement plans. The defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans require an actuarial valuation to determine plan obligations and related periodic costs. We use independent actuaries to assist with these calculations. Plan valuations require economic assumptions, including expected rates of return on plan assets, discount rates to value plan obligations, employee demographic assumptions including mortality rates, and changes in health care costs. The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions. Actual results that differ from the actuarial assumptions are reflected as unrecognized gains and losses. Unrecognized gains and losses that exceed 10% of the greater of the plan’s projected benefit obligations or market value of assets are amortized to earnings over the estimated service life of the remaining plan participants.

Significant assumptions used in valuing our net obligation under our Oshkosh B’Gosh pension plan under which retirement benefits were frozen as of December 31, 2005 are expected long-term rates of return on plans assets and the discount rate used to determine the plan’s projected benefit obligation.

The most significant assumption used to determine our projected benefit obligation under our post-retirement life and medical plan under which retirement benefits were frozen in 1991 is the discount rate used to determine the plan’s projected benefit obligation.

See Note 7, “Employee Benefits Plans,” to our audited consolidated financial statements in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details on rates, assumptions, and sensitivity analyses.

Stock-based compensation arrangements: We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of accounting guidance on share-based payments. We adopted this guidance using the modified prospective application method of transition. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the use of subjective assumptions. These assumptions include the following:

Volatility – This is a measure of the amount by which a stock price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. We use actual monthly historical changes in the market value of our stock covering the expected life of stock options being valued. An increase in the expected volatility will increase compensation expense.

Risk-free interest rate – This is the U.S. Treasury rate as of the grant date having a term equal to the expected term of the stock option. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase compensation expense.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued)

Expected term – This is the period of time over which the stock options granted are expected to remain outstanding and is based on historical experience and estimated future exercise behavior. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. An increase in the expected term will increase compensation expense.

Dividend yield – We do not have plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. An increase in the dividend yield will decrease compensation expense.

Forfeitures – We estimate forfeitures of stock-based awards based on historical experience and expected future activity.

Changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and consequently, the related amount recognized in the accompanying audited consolidated statement of operations.

We account for our performance-based awards in accordance with accounting guidance on share-based payments and record stock-based compensation expense over the vesting term of the awards that are expected to vest based on whether it is probable that the performance criteria will be achieved. We reassess the probability of vesting at each reporting period for awards with performance criteria and adjust stock-based compensation expense based on its probability assessment.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements contained herein that relate to our future performance, including, without limitation, statements with respect to our anticipated results of operations or level of business for fiscal 2010 or any other future period, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based on current expectations only and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, or projected. These risks are described herein under Item 1A of Part II. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

CURRENCY AND INTEREST RATE RISKS

In the operation of our business, we have market risk exposures including those related to foreign currency risk and interest rates. These risks and our strategies to manage our exposure to them are discussed below.

We contract for production with third parties primarily in Asia and South and Central America. While these contracts are stated in United States dollars, there can be no assurance that the cost for the future production of our products will not be affected by exchange rate fluctuations between the United States dollar and the local currencies of these contractors. Due to the number of currencies involved, we cannot quantify the potential impact of future currency fluctuations on net income (loss) in future years. In order to manage this risk, we source products from approximately 100 vendors in over 10 countries, providing us with flexibility in our production should significant fluctuations occur between the United States dollar and various local currencies. To date, such exchange fluctuations have not had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We do not hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk.

Our operating results are subject to risk from interest rate fluctuations on our senior credit facility, which carries variable interest rates. As of July 3, 2010, our outstanding debt aggregated approximately $232.8 million, of which $102.1 million, or 43.8%, bore interest at a variable rate. An increase or decrease of 1% in the applicable rate would increase or decrease our annual interest cost by approximately $1.0 million, exclusive of variable rate debt subject to our interest rate swap agreements, and could have an adverse effect on our net income (loss) and cash flow.

OTHER RISKS

We enter into various purchase order commitments with our suppliers. We can cancel these arrangements, although in some instances, we may be subject to a termination charge reflecting a percentage of work performed prior to cancellation. As we rely exclusively on our full-package global sourcing network, we could incur more of these termination charges, which could increase our cost of goods sold and have a material impact on our business.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of July 3, 2010 due to the fact that there were material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as discussed in more detail in our Annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009 under Part II, Item 9A.

Remediation Plan

Management has been actively engaged in implementing remediation plans to address control deficiencies referenced above. The following remediation efforts have been completed:

·	Making personnel changes, including the separation of certain employees from the Company, and a restructuring of the Company’s sales organization;

·	Establishing more comprehensive procedures for authorizing accommodations, including tiered accommodations approval levels that include the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer;

·	Implementing a periodic training program for all sales personnel regarding the appropriate accounting for accommodations and the impact on the Company’s financial statements of recording such customer accommodations; and

·	Implementing procedures to improve the capture, review, approval, and recording of all accommodation arrangements in the appropriate accounting period.

The remediation efforts in process or expected to be implemented include the following:

·	Establishing a new position in the finance organization with responsibilities to include tracking, monitoring, and reviewing all customer accommodations, including certain budgetary responsibilities for accommodations;

·	Improving the method of educating employees on the Company’s Code of Business Ethics and Professional Conduct; and

·	Reemphasizing to all employees the availability of the Company’s Financial Accounting and Reporting Hotline and communicating information to the Company’s vendors and customers about this Hotline, which is available to both Company employees and its business partners.

Management has developed a detailed plan and timetable for the implementation of the foregoing remediation efforts and will continue to monitor the implementation. In addition, under the direction of the Audit Committee, management will continue to review and make necessary changes to the overall design of the Company’s internal control environment, as well as to policies and procedures to improve the overall effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

Management believes the foregoing efforts will effectively remediate these material weaknesses. As the Company continues to evaluate and work to improve its internal control over financial reporting, management may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or determine to modify the remediation plan described above.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The completed remediation efforts noted above represent changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended July 3, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS:

A shareholder class action lawsuit was filed on September 19, 2008 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entitled Plymouth County Retirement System v. Carter's, Inc., No. 1:08-CV-02940-JOF (the "Plymouth Action"). The Amended Complaint filed on May 12, 2009 in the Plymouth Action asserted claims under Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act, and alleged that between February 1, 2006 and July 24, 2007, the Company and certain current and former executives made misrepresentations to investors regarding the successful integration of OshKosh into the Company's business, and that the share price of the Company's stock later fell when the market learned that the integration had not been as successful as represented. Defendants in the Plymouth Action filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under the federal securities laws on July 17, 2009, and briefing of that motion was complete on October 22, 2009.

A separate shareholder class action lawsuit was filed on November 17, 2009 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entitled Mylroie v. Carter's, Inc., No. 1:09-CV-3196-JOF (the "Mylroie Action"). The initial Complaint in the Mylroie Action asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act, and alleged that between April 27, 2004 and November 10, 2009, the Company and certain current and former executives made misstatements to investors regarding the Company's accounting for discounts offered to some wholesale customers. The Court consolidated the Plymouth Action and the Mylroie Action on November 24, 2009 (the "Consolidated Action"). On March 15, 2010, the plaintiffs in the Consolidated Action filed their amended and consolidated complaint. The Company filed a motion to dismiss on April 30, 2010, and briefing of the motion was complete on July 23, 2010. The Company intends to vigorously defend against the claims in the Consolidated Action.

A shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed on May 25, 2010 in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, entitled Alvarado v. Bloom, No. 2010-cv-186118 (the "Alvarado Action"). The Complaint in the Alvarado Action alleges, among other things, that certain current and former directors and executives of the Company breached their fiduciary duties to the Company in connection with the Company's accounting for discounts offered to some wholesale customers. The Company is named solely as a nominal defendant against whom the plaintiff seeks no recovery. Pursuant to a stipulation among the parties, the Court has temporarily deferred the defendants' obligation to respond to the Complaint pending timely resolution of the motions to dismiss filed in the Consolidated Action referenced above.

The Company is subject to various other claims and pending or threatened lawsuits in the normal course of our business. The Company is not currently party to any other legal proceedings that it believes would have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS:

You should carefully consider each of the following risk factors as well as the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other filings with the SEC in evaluating our business. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impact our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our operating results may be affected.

Risks Relating to Our Business

The loss of one or more of our major customers could result in a material loss of revenues.

In the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, we derived approximately 38% and 41% of our consolidated net sales from our top eight customers, including mass channel customers. Kohl’s accounted for approximately 10% of our consolidated net sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. We do not enter into long-term sales contracts with our major customers, relying instead on long-standing relationships and on our position in the marketplace. As a result, we face the risk that one or more of our major customers may significantly decrease their business with us or terminate their relationships with us. Any such decrease or termination of our major customers' business could result in a material decrease in our sales and operating results.

The acceptance of our products in the marketplace is affected by consumers’ tastes and preferences, along with fashion trends.

We believe that continued success depends on our ability to provide a unique and compelling value proposition for our consumers in the Company’s distribution channels. There can be no assurance that the demand for our products will not decline, or that we will be able to successfully and timely evaluate and adapt our products to changes in consumers’ tastes and preferences or fashion trends. If consumers’ tastes and preferences are not aligned with our product offerings, promotional pricing may be required to move seasonal merchandise. Increased use of promotional pricing would have a material adverse effect on our sales, gross margin, and results of operations.

The value of our brand, and our sales, could be diminished if we are associated with negative publicity.

Although our employees, agents, and third-party compliance auditors periodically visit and monitor the operations of our vendors, independent manufacturers, and licensees, we do not control these vendors, independent manufacturers, licensees, or their labor practices. A violation of our vendor policies, licensee agreements, labor laws, or other laws by these vendors, independent manufacturers, or licensees could interrupt or otherwise disrupt our supply chain or damage our brand image. As a result, negative publicity regarding our Company, brands or products, including licensed products, could adversely affect our reputation and sales.

In addition, the Company’s brand image, which is associated with providing a consumer product with outstanding quality and name recognition, makes it valuable as a royalty source. The Company is able to generate royalty income from the sale of licensed products that bear its Carter’s, Just One Year, Just One You, Precious Firsts, Child of Mine, OshKosh, OshKosh Est. 1895, Genuine Kids, and related trademarks. The Company also generates foreign royalty income as our OshKosh B’gosh label carries an international reputation for quality and American style. While the Company takes significant steps to ensure the reputation of its brand is maintained through its license agreements, there can be no guarantee that the Company’s brand image will not be negatively impacted through its association with products outside of the Company’s core apparel products.

We may incur substantial costs as a result of litigation, investigations or other proceedings, including those related to our previously filed restatements.

We are currently involved in litigation matters and investigations and may be subject to additional actions in the future. As disclosed in the Company’s amended and restated Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008, we announced on November 10, 2009, that our Audit Committee, with the assistance of outside counsel, had commenced a review of customer margin support provided by the Company and an investigation into undisclosed margin support commitments and related matters. The Company self-reported information concerning this investigation to the SEC in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and has also been informed that the United States Attorney’s Office is conducting an inquiry into this matter. The Company has incurred, and expects to continue to incur, substantial expenses for legal and accounting services due to the investigation, the SEC and United States Attorney’s Office inquiries and any resulting litigation. These matters have diverted in the past, and may continue to divert in the future, management’s time and attention away from operations and cause the Company to continue to incur substantial costs. The Company also may bear additional costs to the extent it is required, under the terms of organizational documents or under Delaware law, to indemnify former officers of the Company in respect of costs they incur in connection with any proceedings related to these matters. At this point, the Company is unable to predict the duration, costs, scope or result of these inquiries. In addition to the costs and diversion of management’s attention referred to above, any such inquiries may result in the Company being subject to penalties and other remedial measures, which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

As described in more detail in Part II - Item 1 of this filing, the Company is also currently subject to two class action lawsuits and a derivative shareholder action lawsuit, as well as various other claims and pending or threatened lawsuits in the normal course of our business. We have only limited amounts of insurance, which may not provide coverage to offset a negative judgment or a settlement payment, which could be substantial. We may be unable to obtain additional insurance in the future, or we may be unable to do so on favorable terms. Our insurers may also dispute our claims for coverage. Further, these lawsuits may result in diversion of management's time and attention, the expenditure of large amounts of cash on legal fees and other expenses, and injury to our reputation, all of which may adversely affect our operations and financial condition.

The Company’s databases containing personal information of our retail customers could be breached, which could subject us to adverse publicity, litigation, and expenses. In addition, if we are unable to comply with security standards created by the banks and payment card industry, our operations could be adversely affected.

Database privacy, network security, and identity theft are matters of growing public concern. In an attempt to prevent unauthorized access to our network and databases containing confidential, third-party information, we have installed privacy protection systems, devices, and activity monitoring on our network. Nevertheless, if unauthorized parties gain access to our networks or databases, they may be able to steal, publish, delete, or modify our private and sensitive third-party information. In such circumstances, we could be held liable to our customers or other parties or be subject to regulatory or other actions for breaching privacy rules. This could result in costly investigations and litigation, civil or criminal penalties, and adverse publicity that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and reputation. Further, if we are unable to comply with the security standards, established by banks and payment card industry, we may be subject to fines, restrictions, and expulsion from card acceptance programs, which could adversely affect our retail operations.

There are deflationary pressures on the selling price of apparel products. Increased production costs may adversely affect our results.

In part due to the actions of discount retailers, and in part due to the worldwide supply of low cost garment sourcing, the Company continues to experience pressure to decrease selling prices on children’s apparel. If deflationary price trends outpace our ability to reduce our manufacturing and supply chain costs, or otherwise lower our overall cost structure, our profitability may be affected. We anticipate increases in the costs of production for our vendors over the next year, including increases in cotton prices and labor rates, as well as increasing transportation costs. We are also anticipating appreciation in Asian currencies. All of these increases and currency appreciation may impact our costs of goods sold. If we are unable to absorb these price increases by reducing our manufacturing or supply chain costs or lowering our overall cost structure, or if our ability to effectively raise prices is limited, our profitability may be affected.

Our business is sensitive to overall levels of consumer spending, particularly in the young children’s apparel segment.

Consumers’ demand for young children’s apparel, specifically brand name apparel products, is impacted by the overall level of consumer spending. Discretionary consumer spending is impacted by employment levels, gasoline and utility costs, business conditions, availability of consumer credit, tax rates, interest rates, levels of consumer indebtedness, and overall levels of consumer confidence. Recent and further reductions in the level of discretionary spending may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s sales and results of operations.

We face risks associated with the current global credit crisis and related economic downturn.

The continuing volatility in the financial markets and the related economic downturn in markets throughout the world could have a material adverse effect on our business. While we currently generate significant cash flows from our ongoing operations and have access to credit through amounts available under our revolving credit facility, credit markets have recently experienced significant disruptions and certain leading financial institutions have either declared bankruptcy or have shown significant deterioration in their financial stability. Further deterioration in the financial markets could make future financing difficult or more expensive. If any of the financial institutions that are parties to our revolver were to declare bankruptcy or become insolvent, they may be unable to perform under their agreements with us. This could leave us with reduced borrowing capacity. In addition, tighter credit markets may lead to business disruptions for certain of our suppliers, contract manufacturers or trade customers and consequently, could disrupt our business.

We source substantially all of our products through foreign production arrangements. Our dependence on foreign supply sources could result in disruptions to our operations in the event of political instability, unfavorable economic conditions, international events, or new foreign regulations and such disruptions may increase our cost of goods sold and decrease gross profit.

We source substantially all of our products through a network of vendors primarily in Asia, coordinated by our sourcing agents. The following could disrupt our foreign supply chain, increase our cost of goods sold, decrease our gross profit, or impact our ability to get products to our customers:

· financial instability of one or more of our major vendors;

· political instability or other international events resulting in the disruption of trade in foreign countries from which we source our products;

· increases in transportation costs as a result of increased fuel prices or significant changes in the relationship between carrier capacity and shipper demand;

· interruptions in the supply, or increases in the cost, of raw materials, including cotton, fabric, and trim items;

· significant changes in the cost of labor in our sourcing locations;

· the imposition of new regulations relating to imports, duties, taxes, and other charges on imports;

· the occurrence of a natural disaster, unusual weather conditions, or an epidemic, the spread of which may impact our ability to obtain products on a timely basis;

· changes in the United States customs procedures concerning the importation of apparel products;

· unforeseen delays in customs clearance of any goods;

· disruption in the global transportation network such as a port strike, world trade restrictions, or war;

· the application of foreign intellectual property laws;

· the ability of our vendors to secure sufficient credit to finance the manufacturing process including the acquisition of raw materials; and

· exchange rate fluctuations between the United States dollar and the local currencies of foreign contractors.

These and other events beyond our control could interrupt our supply chain and delay receipt of our products into the United States.

We source all of our products through a network of vendors. We have limited control over these vendors and we may experience delays, product recalls or loss of revenues if our products do not meet our quality standards or regulatory requirements.

Our vendors, independent manufacturers, and licensees may not continue to provide products that are consistent with our standards. We have occasionally received, and may in the future continue to receive, shipments of product that fail to conform to our quality control standards. A failure in our quality control program may result in diminished product quality, which may result in increased order cancellations and returns, decreased consumer demand for our products, or product recalls, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, notwithstanding our strict quality control procedures, because we do not control our vendors, products that fail to meet our standards, or other unauthorized products, could end up in the marketplace without our knowledge. This could materially harm our brand and our reputation in the marketplace.

Our products are subject to regulation of and regulatory standards set by various governmental authorities including the Consumer Product Safety Commission, with respect to quality and safety. Regulations and standards in this area are currently in place. These regulations and standards may change from time to time. Our inability, or that of our vendors, to comply on a timely basis with regulatory requirements could result in significant fines or penalties, which could adversely affect our reputation and sales. Issues with the quality and safety of merchandise we sell in our stores, regardless of our culpability, or customer concerns about such issues, could result in damage to our reputation, lost sales, uninsured product liability claims or losses, merchandise recalls, and increased costs.

We operate in a highly competitive market and the size and resources of some of our competitors may allow them to compete more effectively than we can, resulting in a loss of market share and, as a result, a decrease in revenue and gross profit.

The baby and young children's apparel market is highly competitive. Both branded and private label manufacturers compete in the baby and young children's apparel market. Our primary competitors in our wholesale and mass channel businesses include Disney, Gerber, and private label product offerings. Our primary competitors in the retail store channel include Disney, Gymboree, Old Navy, The Children’s Place, and The Gap. Because of the fragmented nature of the industry, we also compete with many other manufacturers and retailers. Some of our competitors have greater financial resources and larger customer bases than we have and are less financially leveraged than we are. As a result, these competitors may be able to:

· adapt to changes in customer requirements more quickly;

· take advantage of acquisition and other opportunities more readily;

· devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of their products; and

· adopt more aggressive pricing strategies than we can.

The Company’s retail success and future growth is dependent upon identifying locations and negotiating appropriate lease terms for retail stores.

The Company’s retail stores are located in leased retail locations across the country. Successful operation of a retail store depends, in part, on the overall ability of the retail location to attract a consumer base sufficient to make store sales volume profitable. If the Company is unable to identify new retail locations with consumer traffic sufficient to support a profitable sales level, retail growth may consequently be limited. Further, if existing outlet and brand stores do not maintain a sufficient customer base that provides a reasonable sales volume or the Company is unable to negotiate appropriate lease terms for the retail stores, there could be a material adverse impact on the Company’s sales, gross margin, and results of operations.

Profitability could be negatively impacted if we do not adequately forecast the demand for our products and, as a result, create significant levels of excess inventory or insufficient levels of inventory.

If the Company does not adequately forecast demand for its products and purchases inventory to support an inaccurate forecast, the Company could experience increased costs due to the need to dispose of excess inventory or lower profitability due to insufficient levels of inventory.

We may not achieve sales growth plans, cost savings, and other assumptions that support the carrying value of our intangible assets.

As of July 3, 2010, the Company had Carter’s goodwill of $136.6 million, a $220.2 million Carter’s brand tradename asset, and an $85.5 million OshKosh brand tradename asset on its consolidated balance sheet. The carrying value of these assets is subject to annual impairment reviews as of the last day of each fiscal year or more frequently, if deemed necessary, due to any significant events or changes in circumstances.

Estimated future cash flows used in these impairment reviews could be negatively impacted if we do not achieve our sales plans, planned cost savings, and other assumptions that support the carrying value of these intangible assets, which could result in potential impairment of the remaining asset value.

Our inability to remediate our material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

In connection with our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the rules promulgated by the Commission under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 308 of Regulation S-K, management has concluded that as of July 3, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective and that we had material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Please refer to Part I, Item 4 of this filing for further discussion of the ineffectiveness of, and material weaknesses in, our internal controls over financial reporting. Should we be unable to remediate such material weaknesses promptly and effectively, an unresolved weakness could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition, as well as impair our ability to meet our quarterly, annual, and other reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in a timely manner. These effects could in turn adversely affect the trading price of our common stock and could result in a material misstatement of our financial position or results of operations and require a further restatement of our financial statements. In addition, even if we are successful in strengthening our controls and procedures, such controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent or identify misstatements.

The Company’s success is dependent upon retaining key individuals within the organization to execute the Company’s strategic plan.

The Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified executive management, marketing, merchandising, design, sourcing, operations, and support function staffing is key to the Company’s success. If the Company were unable to attract and retain qualified individuals in these areas, an adverse impact on the Company’s growth and results of operations may result.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURTIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS:

N/A

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES:

N/A

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED:

N/A

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION:

N/A

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS:

(a) Exhibits:

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibits

31.1	Rule 13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) and 13a-15(f)/15d-15(f) Certification

31.2	Rule 13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) and 13a-15(f)/15d-15(f) Certification

32	Section 1350 Certification

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CARTER’S, INC.


Date: July 30, 2010	/s/ MICHAEL D. CASEY
	Michael D. Casey
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: July 30, 2010	/s/ RICHARD F. WESTENBERGER
	Richard F. Westenberger
	Executive Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)