Use these links to rapidly review the document
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [X] | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ] |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
[ ] |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
[ ] |
Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
[X] |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
[ ] |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
[ ] |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
FedEx Corporation | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
[X] |
No fee required. |
|||
[ ] |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
[ ] |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
[ ] |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
||
Monday, September 26, 2016 8:00 a.m. local time |
||
FedEx Express World Headquarters Auditorium 3670 Hacks Cross Road, Building G Memphis, Tennessee 38125 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
FedEx's Board of Directors is furnishing you this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies on its behalf for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our stockholders will be voting on the following matters at the annual meeting:
Matter |
Board's Recommendation |
Page |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
Proposal 1: Election of directors |
For | 14 | ||
Proposal 2: Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation |
For | 55 | ||
Proposal 3: Ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm |
For | 60 | ||
Proposals 4 7: Stockholder proposals |
Against | 62 | ||
| | | | |
Stockholders also will consider any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.
How to Cast Your Vote and Annual Meeting Admission
If you are a registered stockholder, you can vote by any of the following methods:
Online | By Phone | Proxy Card | In Person | |||
www.investorvote.com/FEDX through 9/25/2016 |
1-800-652-VOTE (8683) through 9/25/2016 |
Completing, signing and returning your proxy card |
With a ticket or proof of ownership and a valid photo identification |
If your shares are held by a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, you are considered the "beneficial owner" of shares held in "street name." If your shares are held in street name, these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee (the "bank or broker"), along with a voting instruction form. To direct your bank or broker how to vote your shares, complete, sign and return the voting instruction form in the envelope provided or follow the instructions provided to you for voting your shares by telephone or on the Internet. To ensure your shares are voted in the way you would like, you must provide voting instructions by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from your bank or broker. As a beneficial owner, in order to be able to vote your shares at the meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from your bank or broker and bring it with you to hand in with your signed ballot.
If you attend the annual meeting in person, you will need to present your admission ticket, or an account statement showing your ownership of FedEx common stock as of the record date, and a valid government-issued photo identification. The indicated portion of your proxy card or voting instruction form or the ticket accompanying your voting instruction form will serve as your admission ticket. If you are a registered stockholder and receive your proxy materials electronically, you should follow the instructions provided to print a paper admission ticket.
Your vote is very important. Please vote whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.
We are first sending the proxy statement, form of proxy and accompanying materials to stockholders on or about August 15, 2016.
2016 Proxy Statement | i |
Effect of Not Casting Your Vote
If you are a registered stockholder and you do not sign and return your proxy card or vote electronically on the Internet or by telephone, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the meeting.
If you hold your shares in street name and you do not instruct your bank or broker how to vote your shares, your broker may vote your shares in its discretion on the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, but will not be allowed to vote your shares on any of the other proposals.
The principal executive offices of FedEx Corporation are located at 942 South Shady Grove Road, Memphis, Tennessee 38120.
FedEx's Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, which includes FedEx's fiscal 2016 audited consolidated financial statements, accompanies this proxy statement. Although the Annual Report is being distributed with this proxy statement, it does not constitute a part of the proxy solicitation materials and is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
By submitting your proxy (either by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card or by voting electronically on the Internet or by telephone), you authorize Christine P. Richards, FedEx's Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, and Alan B. Graf, Jr., FedEx's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, to represent you and vote your shares at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. They also may vote your shares to adjourn the meeting and will be authorized to vote your shares at any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.
If you vote on the Internet, you may elect to have next year's proxy statement and annual report to stockholders delivered to you electronically. We strongly encourage you to enroll in electronic delivery. It is a cost-effective way for us to provide you with proxy materials and annual reports.
ii | 2016 Proxy Statement |
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. Page references are supplied to help you find further information in this proxy statement.
Corporate Governance Matters (see page 1)
FedEx's strong and independent Board of Directors effectively oversees our management and provides vigorous oversight of FedEx's business and affairs in support of our mission of producing superior financial returns for our shareowners by providing high value-added logistics, transportation and related business services through focused operating companies. The Board is currently comprised of 13 members a combined Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Lead Independent Director and 11 other independent, active and effective directors of equal importance and rights.
The Board believes that this current leadership structure provides the most effective governance of FedEx's business and affairs for the long-term benefit of stockholders and promotes a culture and reputation of the highest ethics, integrity and reliability.
In March 2016, our Board of Directors adopted a proxy access bylaw after we engaged with a number of our largest stockholders to understand their views on proxy access and the appropriate proxy access structure for FedEx. The proxy access bylaw permits up to 20 stockholders owning 3% or more of FedEx's outstanding voting stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in FedEx's proxy materials directors constituting up to two individuals or 20% of the Board, whichever is greater, provided that the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the Bylaws.
You can find detailed information about our corporate governance policies and practices in the Corporate Governance Matters section of this proxy statement. You can also access our corporate governance documents in the Governance & Citizenship section of the Investor Relations page of our website at http://investors.fedex.com.
Corporate Governance Facts
| | |
Proxy Access |
Yes | |
Majority Voting for Directors |
Yes | |
Annual Election of All Directors |
Yes | |
Diverse Board |
Yes | |
Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations |
Yes | |
Separate Chairman & CEO |
No | |
Lead Independent Director |
Yes | |
Independent Directors Meet Regularly Without Management Present |
Yes | |
Annual Independent Director Evaluation of Chairman and CEO |
Yes | |
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Applicable to Directors |
Yes | |
Nominating & Governance Committee Composed of Independent Directors |
Yes | |
Stock Ownership Goal for Directors and Senior Officers |
Yes | |
Size of Board* |
13 | |
Number of Independent Directors* |
12 | |
Average Age of Directors* |
60 | |
Average Director Tenure (in years)* |
12 | |
Median Director Tenure (in years)* |
8 | |
| | |
2016 Proxy Statement | iii |
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
Proposal 1 Election of Directors (see page 14)
You are being asked to elect the 12 nominees named in this proxy statement as directors for a term of one year. Other than Gary W. Loveman, each of our current directors is standing for reelection.
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the election of each of the twelve nominees.
Director Nominees (see page 15)
Director Nominee |
| Age |
| Director Since |
| Independent |
| Position |
| Other public directorships |
| AC |
| CC |
| ITOC |
| NGC |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||
Frederick W. Smith | | 72 | | 1971 | | | |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of FedEx Corporation |
|
| | | | | | | | | ||
James L. Barksdale | | 73 | | 1999 | | ü | | Chairman and President of Barksdale Management Corporation |
| Time Warner Inc. | | | | C | | ü | ||||
John A. Edwardson | | 67 | | 2003 | | ü | |
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CDW Corporation |
|
Chubb Limited (formerly ACE Limited), Rockwell Collins, Inc. |
|
C | | | | | | | ||
Marvin R. Ellison | | 51 | | 2014 | | ü | | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of J. C. Penney Company, Inc. |
| J. C. Penney Company, Inc. | | | ü | | (1) | | ü | |||
John C. ("Chris") Inglis |
|
61 | | 2015 | | ü | |
Professor at the U.S. Naval Academy |
|
Huntington Bancshares Inc., KEYW Corp. |
|
| | (2) | | ü | | ü | ||
Kimberly A. Jabal | | 47 | | 2013 | | ü | | Chief Financial Officer of Weebly, Inc. |
| | ü | | | ü | | |||||
Shirley Ann Jackson | | 70 | | 1999 | | ü | |
President of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
|
International Business Machines Corporation, Medtronic, Inc., Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated |
|
(3) | | ü | | | | ü | ||
R. Brad Martin | | 64 | | 2011 | | ü | | Chairman of RBM Venture Company |
| Chesapeake Energy Corporation (Chairman), First Horizon National Corporation |
| ü | | | ü (4) | | (4) | |||
Joshua Cooper Ramo |
|
47 | | 2011 | | ü | |
Vice Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Kissinger Associates, Inc. |
|
Starbucks Corporation | | ü | | | | ü | | | ||
Susan C. Schwab | | 61 | | 2009 | | ü | | Professor at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy |
| The Boeing Company, Caterpillar Inc., Marriott International, Inc. |
| | ü | | ü | | ||||
David P. Steiner | | 56 | | 2009 | | ü | |
Chief Executive Officer of Waste Management, Inc. |
|
Waste Management, Inc. | | | | | | | | C (5) | ||
Paul S. Walsh | | 61 | | 1996 | | ü | | Chairman of Compass Group PLC |
| Avanti Communications Group plc (Chairman), Compass Group PLC (Chairman), HSBC Holdings plc, Pace Holdings Corp., RM2 International S.A. |
| | C | | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
iv | 2016 Proxy Statement |
Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills (see page 19)
The Board believes that it is desirable that the following experience, qualifications, attributes and skills be possessed by one or more of FedEx's Board members because of their particular relevance to the company's business and structure, and these were all considered by the Board in connection with this year's director nomination process:
Proposal 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation (see page 55)
Our executive compensation program is designed not only to retain and attract highly qualified and effective executives, but also to motivate them to substantially contribute to FedEx's future success for the long-term benefit of shareowners and reward them for doing so. We believe there should be a strong relationship between pay and corporate performance, and our executive compensation program reflects this belief.
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narrative provide detailed information on the compensation of our named executive officers, and can be found on pages 20 through 54. We believe this information demonstrates that our executive compensation program promotes the best interests of FedEx and our shareowners by enabling FedEx to retain and attract talented executive management, while ensuring they are compensated in such a manner as to sustain and enhance long-term shareowner value.
In the 2015 advisory vote, 96.2% of the voted shares supported the compensation of our named executive officers.
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" this proposal.
Proposal 3 Ratify the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as FedEx's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (see page 60)
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm and has specific policies in place to ensure its independence. The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP ("Ernst & Young") to serve as FedEx's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2017. Ernst & Young has been our independent registered public accounting firm since 2002.
Fees paid to Ernst & Young for fiscal 2016 and 2015 are detailed on page 59.
Representatives of Ernst & Young will be present at the meeting, will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" this proposal.
Proposals 4 7: Four Stockholder Proposals, if properly presented (see pages 62 73)
Four stockholder proposals are expected to be presented for a vote at the annual meeting.
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote "AGAINST" each of these proposals.
2016 Proxy Statement | v |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
To Our Stockholders:
We cordially invite you to attend the 2016 annual meeting of FedEx's stockholders. The meeting will take place in the auditorium at the FedEx Express World Headquarters, 3670 Hacks Cross Road, Building G, Memphis, Tennessee 38125, on Monday, September 26, 2016, at 8:00 a.m. local time. We look forward to your attendance either in person or by proxy.
The purposes of the meeting are to:
Members of FedEx's management team will be present at the meeting to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on August 1, 2016, may vote at the meeting or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Christine P. Richards
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
August 15, 2016
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2016: The following materials are available on the Investor Relations page of the FedEx website at http://investors.fedex.com:
Your vote is very important. Please vote whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.
2016 PROXY STATEMENT
Table of Contents
Our Board of Directors and management team are committed to achieving and maintaining high standards of corporate governance, as well as a culture of and reputation for the highest levels of ethics, integrity and reliability. We periodically review our governance policies and practices against evolving standards and make changes as appropriate. We also value the perspectives of our stockholders and other stakeholders, including our employees and the communities in which we operate, and take steps to implement their points of view where warranted.
In considering possible modifications of our corporate governance policies and practices, our Board and management focus on those changes that are appropriate for our company and our industry, rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach. Our focus is on the best long-term interests of our company, our stockholders and our stakeholders.
The following sections summarize our corporate governance policies and practices, including our Board leadership structure, our criteria for director selection and the responsibilities and activities of our Board and its committees. Our corporate governance documents, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board committee charters and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, are available in the Governance & Citizenship section of the Investor Relations page of our website at http://investors.fedex.com.
The leadership structure of our Board of Directors includes (i) a combined Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, (ii) independent, active and effective directors of equal importance and rights, who all have the same opportunities and responsibilities in providing vigorous oversight of the effectiveness of management policies and (iii) a Lead Independent Director. The Chairperson of the Nominating & Governance Committee, who is elected annually by a majority of the independent Board members, serves as the Lead Independent Director. The Board believes that FedEx has been and continues to be well served by having the company's founder, Frederick W. Smith, serve as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The current Board leadership model, when combined with the composition of the Board, the strong leadership of our independent directors, Board committees and Lead Independent Director, and the highly effective corporate governance structures and processes already in place, strikes an appropriate balance between consistent leadership and independent oversight of FedEx's business and affairs.
The Board believes that FedEx's Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines help ensure that strong and independent directors will continue to play the central oversight role necessary to maintain FedEx's commitment to the highest quality corporate governance. Under our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board maintains the following long-standing practices, in addition to those described above:
2016 Proxy Statement | 1 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
The Board of Directors' role in risk oversight at FedEx is consistent with the company's leadership structure, with management having day-to-day responsibility for assessing and managing the company's risk exposure and the Board and its committees providing oversight in connection with those efforts, with particular focus on ensuring that FedEx's risk management practices are adequate and regularly reviewing the most significant risks facing the company. The Board performs its risk oversight role by using several different levels of review. Each Board meeting begins with a strategic overview by the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer that describes the most significant issues, including risks, affecting the company, and also includes business updates from each reporting segment CEO. In addition, at least annually, the Board reviews in detail the business and operations of each of the company's reporting segments, including the primary risks associated with that segment. The Board also reviews the risks associated with the company's financial forecasts and annual business plan.
Additionally, risks are identified and managed in connection with the company's robust enterprise risk management ("ERM") process. Our ERM process provides the enterprise with a common framework and terminology to ensure consistency in identification, reporting and management of key risks. The ERM process is embedded in our strategic financial planning process, which ensures explicit consideration of risks that affect the underlying assumptions of strategic plans and provides a platform to facilitate integration of risk information in business decision-making.
The Board has delegated to each of its committees responsibility for the oversight of specific risks that fall within the committee's areas of responsibility. For example:
In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing with management the guidelines and policies that govern the processes by which the company assesses and manages its exposure to all risk, including our ERM process. The ERM process culminates in an annual presentation to the Audit Committee on the key enterprise risks facing FedEx.
2 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Executive Management Succession Planning
The Board of Directors has in place an effective planning process to select successors to the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and other members of executive management. The Nominating & Governance Committee, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, annually reports to the Board on executive management succession planning. The entire Board works with the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer to evaluate potential successors to the CEO and other members of executive management. Through this process, the Board receives information that includes qualitative evaluations of potential successors to the CEO and other executives. As noted above, each Board member has complete and open access to any member of management. We believe this enhances the Board's oversight of succession planning. The Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer periodically provides to the Board his recommendations and evaluations of potential successors, along with a review of any development plans recommended for such individuals. Additionally, the Board periodically reviews and revises as necessary the company's emergency executive management succession plan, which details the actions to be taken by specific individuals in the event a member of executive management suddenly dies or becomes incapacitated.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Governance Committees and, with the exception of Frederick W. Smith, each of the Board's current members (James L. Barksdale, John A. Edwardson, Marvin R. Ellison, John C. ("Chris") Inglis, Kimberly A. Jabal, Shirley Ann Jackson, Gary W. Loveman, R. Brad Martin, Joshua Cooper Ramo, Susan C. Schwab, David P. Steiner and Paul S. Walsh) is independent and meets the applicable independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (including the additional requirements for Audit Committee and Compensation Committee members) and the Board's more stringent standards for determining director independence. Mr. Smith is FedEx's Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Under the Board's standards of director independence, which are included in FedEx's Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director will be considered independent only if the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no direct or indirect material relationship with FedEx, other than as a director. The standards set forth certain categories or types of transactions, relationships or arrangements with FedEx, as follows, each of which (i) is deemed not to be a material relationship with FedEx, and thus (ii) will not, by itself, prevent a director from being considered independent:
2016 Proxy Statement | 3 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
such organization by FedEx have not within any of such organization's three most recently completed fiscal years exceeded one percent (or $250,000, whichever is greater) of such organization's consolidated gross revenues for such year.
The Board broadly considered all relevant facts and circumstances, including the following immaterial transactions, relationships and arrangements:
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Board of Directors has determined that at least one member of the Audit Committee, John A. Edwardson, is an audit committee financial expert as that term is defined in Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules.
A director must retire immediately before the annual meeting of FedEx's stockholders during the calendar year in which he or she attains age 75.
4 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Stock Ownership Goal for Directors and Senior Officers
In order to encourage significant stock ownership by our directors and senior officers, and to further align their interests with the interests of FedEx's stockholders, the Board of Directors has established a goal that (i) within four years after joining the Board, each non-management director own FedEx shares valued at three times his or her annual retainer fee, and (ii) within four years after being appointed to his or her position, each member of senior management own FedEx shares valued at the following multiple of his or her annual base salary:
For purposes of meeting this goal, unvested restricted stock is counted, but unexercised stock options are not. The Board also recommends that each director and senior officer retain shares acquired upon stock option exercises until his or her goal is met. The stock ownership goal is included in FedEx's Corporate Governance Guidelines. As of August 1, 2016, each director who had been a Board member for over four years and each executive officer owned sufficient shares to comply with this goal.
The Board of Directors has adopted a policy requiring stockholder approval for any future "poison pill" prior to or within twelve months after adoption of the poison pill. (A poison pill is a device used to deter a hostile takeover. Note that FedEx does not currently have, nor have we ever had, a poison pill.) The policy on poison pills is included in FedEx's Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with any member (including the Lead Independent Director) or committee of the Board of Directors by writing to: FedEx Corporation Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, 942 South Shady Grove Road, Memphis, Tennessee 38120. Please specify to whom your letter should be directed. The Corporate Secretary of FedEx will review all such correspondence and regularly forward to the Board a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all correspondence that, in her opinion, deals with the functions of the Board or its committees or that she otherwise determines requires the attention of any member, group or committee of the Board of Directors. Board members may at any time review a log of all correspondence received by FedEx that is addressed to Board members and request copies of any such correspondence.
In March 2016, the Board of Directors amended our bylaws to implement proxy access. Before the Board's adoption of the bylaw, we contacted many of our largest stockholders in order to understand their views and policies regarding proxy access. We spoke with, or otherwise received feedback from, representatives of stockholders owning nearly half of our then-outstanding shares. We also spoke with a representative of the proponent of the proxy access stockholder proposal that was approved at our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders.
Substantially all of these stockholders, including the proponent of last year's proxy access stockholder proposal, indicated their support for a proxy access bylaw with terms consistent with the prevailing market standard, which are as follows:
Based on this feedback from our stockholders, and the Board's assessment of the relative merits of the various proxy access formulations, our Board of Directors approved amendments to our Bylaws to implement proxy access consistent with the terms set forth above, which it determined to be in the best interests of our stockholders. Our Bylaws are available in the Governance & Citizenship section of the Investor Relations page of our website at http://investors.fedex.com.
2016 Proxy Statement | 5 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Nomination of Director Candidates
The Nominating & Governance Committee will consider director nominees proposed by stockholders. To recommend a prospective director candidate for the Nominating & Governance Committee's consideration, stockholders may submit the candidate's name, qualifications, including whether the candidate satisfies the requirements set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and discussed in "Proposal 1 Election of Directors Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills," and other relevant biographical information in writing to: FedEx Corporation Nominating & Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, 942 South Shady Grove Road, Memphis, Tennessee 38120. FedEx's Bylaws require stockholders to give advance notice of stockholder proposals, including nominations of director candidates. For more information, please see "Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2017 Annual Meeting."
The Board is responsible for recommending director candidates for election by the stockholders and for electing directors to fill vacancies or newly created directorships. The Board has delegated the screening and evaluation process for director candidates to the Nominating & Governance Committee, which identifies, evaluates and recruits highly qualified director candidates and recommends them to the Board. The Nominating & Governance Committee considers potential candidates for director that may come to the attention of the Nominating & Governance Committee through current directors, management, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. The Nominating & Governance Committee has engaged a third-party executive search firm to assist in identifying potential director candidates. The Nominating & Governance Committee considers and evaluates a director candidate recommended by a stockholder in the same manner as a nominee recommended by a Board member, management, search firm or other sources.
If the Nominating & Governance Committee determines that an additional or replacement director is necessary or advisable, the Nominating & Governance Committee may take such measures that it considers appropriate in connection with its evaluation of a potential director candidate, including interviewing the candidate, engaging an outside firm to gather additional information and making inquiries of persons with knowledge of the candidate's qualifications and character. In its evaluation of potential director candidates, including the members of the Board of Directors eligible for reelection, the Nominating & Governance Committee considers the current size, composition and needs of the Board of Directors and each of its committees.
Majority-Voting Standard for Director Elections
FedEx's Bylaws require that we use a majority-voting standard in uncontested director elections and contain a resignation requirement for directors who fail to receive the required majority vote. The Bylaws also prohibit the Board from changing back to a plurality-voting standard without the approval of our stockholders. Under the majority-voting standard, a director nominee must receive more votes cast "for" than "against" his or her election in order to be elected to the Board. In accordance with the majority-voting standard and resignation requirement, each director who is standing for reelection at the annual meeting has tendered an irrevocable resignation from the Board of Directors that will take effect if (i) the director does not receive more votes cast "for" than "against" his or her election at the annual meeting, and (ii) the Board accepts the resignation. FedEx's Bylaws require the Board of Directors, within 90 days after certification of the election results, to accept the director's resignation unless there is a compelling reason not to do so and to promptly disclose its decision (including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the resignation) in a filing with the SEC.
6 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Policy on Review and Preapproval of Related Person Transactions
The Board of Directors has adopted a Policy on Review and Preapproval of Related Person Transactions, which is included in FedEx's Corporate Governance Guidelines. The policy requires that all proposed related person transactions (as defined in the policy) and all proposed material changes to existing related person transactions be reviewed and preapproved by the Nominating & Governance Committee. To the extent the related person (as defined in the policy) is a director or immediate family member of a director, the transaction or change must also be reviewed and preapproved by the full Board. The policy provides that a related person transaction or a material change to an existing related person transaction may not be preapproved if it would:
The policy requires the Nominating & Governance Committee to annually (i) review each existing related person transaction that has a remaining term of at least one year or remaining payments of at least $120,000, and (ii) determine, based upon all material facts and circumstances and taking into consideration our contractual obligations, whether it is in the best interests of FedEx and our stockholders to continue, modify or terminate the transaction or relationship.
In accordance with the policy described above, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, preapproved the employment of Mr. Smith's daughter by FedEx Corporation as a global public policy advisor, a position she has held since August 2016 (Mr. Smith recused himself from the discussion and vote on this matter). In addition, the Nominating & Governance Committee has reviewed the following related person transactions and determined that they remain in the best interests of FedEx and our stockholders:
2016 Proxy Statement | 7 |
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the amount of FedEx's common stock beneficially owned by each director, each named executive officer included in the Summary Compensation Table and all directors and executive officers as a group, as of August 1, 2016. Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership is direct and the person shown has sole voting and investment power.
|
| Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
||||||
| | | | | | | ||
Name of Beneficial Owner |
| Number of Shares |
| Number of Option Shares (1) |
| Percent of Class (2) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | ||
Frederick W. Smith |
| 19,510,669 | (3) | 1,486,882 | | 7.86% | ||
James L. Barksdale |
| 65,200 | | 44,775 | | * | ||
John A. Edwardson |
| 24,690 | | 44,775 | | * | ||
Marvin R. Ellison |
| | | 7,898 | | * | ||
John C. ("Chris") Inglis |
| | | | | * | ||
Kimberly A. Jabal |
| | | 8,627 | | * | ||
Shirley Ann Jackson |
| 8,111 | | 6,145 | | * | ||
Gary W. Loveman |
| 16,854 | | 33,935 | | * | ||
R. Brad Martin |
| 56,500 | (4) | 20,535 | | * | ||
Joshua Cooper Ramo |
| 4,360 | | 16,175 | | * | ||
Susan C. Schwab |
| 3,226 | | 35,975 | | * | ||
David P. Steiner |
| 5,000 | | 31,575 | | * | ||
Paul S. Walsh |
| 10,000 | | 40,375 | | * | ||
David J. Bronczek |
| 59,382 | (5) | 239,238 | | * | ||
Robert B. Carter |
| 49,644 | (6) | 185,252 | | * | ||
T. Michael Glenn |
| 214,980 | (7) | 185,252 | | * | ||
Alan B. Graf, Jr. |
| 205,911 | (8) | 185,252 | | * | ||
All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons) |
| 20,408,472 | (9) | 2,862,120 | | 8.67% | ||
| | | | | | |
8 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
STOCK OWNERSHIP
The following table lists certain persons known by FedEx to own beneficially more than five percent of FedEx's outstanding shares of common stock as of March 31, 2016.
|
| Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
| Percent of Class |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
BlackRock, Inc. |
|
16,241,854 | (1) | 6.05% | |
PRIMECAP Management Company |
| 16,116,764 | (2) | 6.01% | |
The Vanguard Group, Inc. |
|
17,022,983 | (3) | 6.34% | |
| | | | |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires directors and certain officers of FedEx and persons who own more than ten percent of FedEx's common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of beneficial ownership (Form 3) and reports of subsequent changes in their beneficial ownership (Form 4 or Form 5) of FedEx's common stock. Such directors, officers and greater-than-ten-percent stockholders are required to furnish FedEx with copies of the Section 16(a) reports they file. The SEC has established specific due dates for these reports, and FedEx is required to disclose in this proxy statement any late filings or failures to file.
Based solely upon a review of the copies of the Section 16(a) reports (and any amendments thereto) furnished to FedEx and written representations from FedEx's directors and reporting officers that no additional reports were required, FedEx believes that its directors and reporting officers complied with all these filing requirements for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016.
2016 Proxy Statement | 9 |
COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Information Technology Oversight Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee. Each committee's written charter, as adopted by the Board of Directors, is available on the Investor Relations page of our website at http://investors.fedex.com in the Governance & Citizenship section under "Committee Charters." Committee memberships are currently as follows:
Audit Committee | | |
| | |
Committee functions: oversees the independent registered public accounting firm's qualifications, independence and performance; assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of (i) the integrity of FedEx's financial statements; (ii) the effectiveness of FedEx's disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) the performance of the internal auditors; preapproves all audit and allowable non-audit services to be provided by FedEx's independent registered public accounting firm; reviews and discusses with management and the Board of Directors (i) the guidelines and policies that govern the processes by which the company assesses and manages its exposure to risk and (ii) the company's major financial and other risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures; and oversees FedEx's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the implementation and effectiveness of FedEx's corporate integrity and compliance
programs. |
|
Committee members John A. Edwardson (Chairman) FY16 meetings held: 10 |
Compensation Committee | | |
| | |
Committee functions: evaluates, together with the independent members of the Board, the performance of FedEx's Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and recommends his compensation for approval by the independent directors; helps discharge the Board's responsibilities relating to the compensation of executive management; reviews and discusses with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and produces a report recommending whether the Compensation Discussion and Analysis should be included in the proxy statement; and oversees the
administration of FedEx's equity compensation plans and reviews the costs and structure of key employee benefit and fringe-benefit plans and programs. |
|
Committee members Paul S. Walsh (Chairman) FY16 meetings held: 6 |
Information Technology Oversight Committee | | |
| | |
Committee functions: reviews major information technology ("IT") related projects and technology architecture decisions; assesses whether FedEx's IT programs effectively support FedEx's business objectives and strategies; assists FedEx's Board of Directors in oversight of cybersecurity risks and FedEx management's efforts to monitor and mitigate those risks; and advises FedEx's senior IT management team and the Board of Directors on IT-related matters. |
|
Committee members James L. Barksdale (Chairman) FY16 meetings held: 6 |
10 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Nominating & Governance Committee | | |
| | |
Committee functions: identifies individuals qualified to become Board members; recommends to the Board director nominees to be proposed for election at the annual meeting of stockholders; recommends to the Board directors for appointment to Board committees; and assists the Board in developing and
implementing effective corporate governance programs. |
|
Committee members David P. Steiner (Chairman) FY16 meetings held: 6 |
In addition, as discussed above under "Corporate Governance Matters Board Risk Oversight," each Board committee has responsibility for the oversight of specific risks that fall within the committee's areas of responsibility. Also, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing with management the guidelines and policies that govern the processes by which the company assesses and manages its exposure to all risk, including our ERM process.
In response to stockholder demand letters, three special committees of the Board have been formed, which are comprised of Messrs. Edwardson and Steiner and Ms. Jabal. In the aggregate, these committees met three times during fiscal 2016.
The Board of Directors has approved reconstituting the committees so that, immediately following the annual meeting, if all of the director nominees are elected, committee memberships will be as follows:
Audit Committee | Information Technology Oversight Committee |
|
| | |
John A. Edwardson (Chairman) | James L. Barksdale (Chairman) | |
Kimberly A. Jabal | Marvin R. Ellison | |
Shirley Ann Jackson | John C. ("Chris") Inglis | |
R. Brad Martin | Kimberly A. Jabal | |
Joshua Cooper Ramo | Joshua Cooper Ramo | |
| | |
Susan C. Schwab | ||
| | |
Compensation Committee |
Nominating & Governance Committee |
|
| | |
Paul S. Walsh (Chairman) | David P. Steiner (Chairman) | |
Marvin R. Ellison | James L. Barksdale | |
John C. ("Chris") Inglis | Marvin R. Ellison | |
Shirley Ann Jackson | John C. ("Chris") Inglis | |
Susan C. Schwab | Shirley Ann Jackson | |
| | |
R. Brad Martin | ||
| | |
Board Meetings and Meeting Attendance
During fiscal 2016, the Board of Directors held six regular meetings and two special meetings. The average attendance of all directors at Board and committee meetings was 99%. Each director attended at least 88% of the aggregate meetings of the Board and any committees on which he or she served.
Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders
FedEx expects all Board members to attend annual meetings of stockholders. Each then-current member of the Board of Directors attended the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders.
2016 Proxy Statement | 11 |
Outside Directors' Compensation
During fiscal 2016, non-management (outside) directors were paid an annual retainer of $120,000. Chairpersons of the Compensation, Nominating & Governance and Information Technology Oversight Committees were paid an additional annual fee of $13,500. The Audit Committee chairperson was paid an additional annual fee of $22,500. In addition, each outside director who was elected at FedEx's 2015 annual meeting received a stock option for 3,610 shares of FedEx common stock.
Any outside director who was elected to the Board after the 2015 annual meeting received the applicable pro rata portion of the annual retainer and stock option grant in connection with his or her election.
In response to stockholder demand letters, three special committees of the Board have been formed, which are comprised of Messrs. Edwardson and Steiner and Ms. Jabal. Members of the special committees are paid $2,000 for each in-person meeting attended and $1,500 for each telephonic meeting attended.
Frederick W. Smith, the only director who is also a FedEx employee, receives no additional compensation for serving as a director.
The Compensation Committee annually reviews director compensation, including, among other things, comparing FedEx's director compensation practices with those of other companies with annual revenues between $25 billion and $100 billion. Before making a recommendation regarding director compensation to the Board, the Compensation Committee considers that the directors' independence may be compromised if compensation exceeds appropriate levels or if FedEx enters into other arrangements beneficial to the directors.
Retirement Plan for Outside Directors
In July 1997, the Board of Directors of FedEx Express (FedEx's predecessor) voted to freeze the Retirement Plan for Outside Directors (that is, no further benefits would be earned under this plan). Concurrent with the freeze, the Board amended the plan to accelerate the vesting of the benefits for each outside director who was not yet vested under the plan. This plan is unfunded and any benefits under the plan are general, unsecured obligations of FedEx. Once all benefits are paid from the plan, it will be terminated.
The plan benefit payable to the one individual who served on the Board during fiscal 2016 who has not yet received any plan benefits will be paid as a single lump sum distribution. The lump sum distribution is payable on or before the fifteenth business day of the month immediately following the later of the date of the director's retirement and the date he attains age 60. In the event of the outside director's death, his surviving spouse shall be entitled to receive the lump sum payment. The following table sets forth for the one director entitled to receive future benefits under the plan who served on the Board during fiscal 2016, the amount payable to him assuming a hypothetical retirement date of June 1, 2016.
Name |
| Lump Sum Payment Amount ($) |
| |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
P.S. Walsh |
| 70,720 | (1) | ||
| | | | |
12 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION
Fiscal 2016 Director Compensation
The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation of FedEx's non-employee (outside) directors for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016:
Name |
| Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (1) |
| Option Awards ($) (2)(3) |
| All Other Compensation ($) |
| Total ($) |
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | ||||
J.L. Barksdale |
| 133,500 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 274,201 | | ||||
J.A. Edwardson |
| 147,000 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 287,701 | | ||||
M.R. Ellison |
| 120,000 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 260,701 | | ||||
J.C. Inglis |
| 108,000 | | 131,121 | | 0 | | 239,121 | | ||||
K.A. Jabal |
| 124,500 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 265,201 | | ||||
S.A. Jackson |
| 120,000 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 260,701 | | ||||
G.W. Loveman |
| 120,000 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 260,701 | | ||||
R.B. Martin |
| 120,000 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 260,701 | | ||||
J.C. Ramo |
| 120,000 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 260,701 | | ||||
S.C. Schwab |
| 120,000 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 260,701 | | ||||
D.P. Steiner |
| 138,000 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 278,701 | | ||||
P.S. Walsh |
| 133,500 | | 140,701 | | 0 | | 274,201 | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | |
Name |
Options Outstanding |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
J.L. Barksdale |
| 44,775 | |||
J.A. Edwardson |
44,775 | ||||
M.R. Ellison |
| 7,898 | |||
J.C. Inglis |
3,015 | ||||
K.A. Jabal |
| 8,627 | |||
S.A. Jackson |
6,145 | ||||
G.W. Loveman |
| 33,935 | |||
R.B. Martin |
20,535 | ||||
J.C. Ramo |
| 16,175 | |||
S.C. Schwab |
35,975 | ||||
D.P. Steiner |
| 31,575 | |||
P.S. Walsh |
40,375 | ||||
| | | | | |
2016 Proxy Statement | 13 |
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
All of FedEx's directors are elected at each annual meeting of stockholders and hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The Board of Directors currently consists of thirteen members. Gary W. Loveman is retiring as a director immediately before this annual meeting and is not standing for reelection. The Board proposes that each of the other current directors be reelected to the Board. Mr. Inglis was initially elected as a director by the Board in November 2015. Frederick W. Smith, FedEx's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and the members of the Nominating & Governance Committee recommended Mr. Inglis as a nominee.
Effective upon the retirement of Mr. Loveman, the size of the Board will be decreased to twelve members. Each of the nominees elected at this annual meeting will hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2017 and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.
Each nominee has consented to being named in this proxy statement and has agreed to serve if elected. If a nominee is unable to stand for election, the Board of Directors may either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, the proxy holders may vote your shares for the substitute nominee.
Under FedEx's majority-voting standard, each of the twelve director nominees must receive more votes cast "for" than "against" his or her election in order to be elected to the Board. For more information, please see "Corporate Governance Matters Majority-Voting Standard for Director Elections."
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE TWELVE NOMINEES.
Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee seeks director nominees with the skills and experience needed to properly oversee the interests of the company. The Committee carefully evaluates each candidate to ensure that he or she possesses the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that the Committee has found are necessary for an effective board member. These crucial qualities include, among others:
In addition to the qualifications that each director nominee must have, the Board believes that one or more of FedEx's Board members should possess the experience and expertise listed below because of their particular relevance to the company's business and structure. These were all considered by the Board in connection with this year's director nomination process.
Diversity: The Board is committed to diversity and inclusion and is always looking for highly qualified candidates, including women (Ms. Jabal, Dr. Jackson and Ambassador Schwab) and minorities (Dr. Jackson and Mr. Ellison), who meet our criteria. The Board seeks, and believes it has found in this group of nominees, a diverse blend of experience and perspectives, institutional knowledge and personal chemistry, and directors who will provide sound and prudent guidance with respect to all of FedEx's operations and interests.
Below you will find each nominee's biography along with other pertinent information, including a selection of each Board nominee's skills and qualifications. Following the biographies, we have included a chart that exhibits the collective experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of our Board nominees.
14 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees for Election to the Board
Frederick W. Smith | ||
| | |
|
Age: 72 Director since: 1971 Committees: None Other public directorships: None |
|
Mr. Smith is the company's founder and has been Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of FedEx since 1998 and Chairman of FedEx Express since 1975. He was Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of FedEx Express from 1983 to 1998, Chief Executive Officer of FedEx Express from 1977 to 1998, and President of FedEx Express from 1971 to 1975. Skills and Qualifications: Transportation Industry: Founder of our company and the pioneer of the express transportation industry. International: Leads our multinational company and has served on the board of the Council on Foreign Relations and as chairman of the U.S.-China Business
Council and the French-American Business Council. Energy: Co-chairman of the Energy Security Leadership Council. |
James L. Barksdale | ||
| | |
|
Age: 73 Director since: 1999 Committees: Information Technology Oversight (Chairman), Nominating & Governance Other public directorships: Time Warner Inc. |
|
Mr. Barksdale is Chairman and President of Barksdale Management Corporation, an investment management company, a position he has held since 1999. He is also the former Managing Partner of The Barksdale
Group, a venture capital firm, a position he held from 1999 to 2013. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Netscape Communications Corporation, a provider of software, services and website resources to Internet users, from 1995 to 1999. He
held various senior management positions at FedEx Express from 1979 to 1992, including Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and was a director of FedEx Express from 1983 to 1991. He was previously a director of Sun Microsystems,
Inc. From January 2012 to June 2012, he served as the interim Executive Director of the Mississippi Development Authority. Skills and Qualifications: Transportation Industry: Held various senior management positions at our company during its early years. Technology: Has held executive positions with multiple technology companies. Government: Served on the U.S. President's Intelligence Advisory Board for seven years. |
John A. Edwardson | ||
| | |
|
Age: 67 Director since: 2003 Committees: Audit (Chairman) Other public directorships: Chubb Limited (formerly ACE Limited) and Rockwell Collins, Inc. |
|
Mr. Edwardson is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CDW Corporation, a provider of technology products and services, serving as Chief Executive Officer from 2001 to September 2011 and as
Chairman from 2001 to December 2012. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Burns International Services Corporation, a provider of security services, from 1999 to 2000. He was President and Chief Operating Officer of UAL Corporation (the
parent company of United Air Lines, Inc.), an airline, from 1995 to 1998. He is a former director of CDW Corporation. Skills and Qualifications: Transportation Industry/International: Former President and COO of a major airline. Financial: Former CFO of two public companies. Technology: Former CEO of a technology products and services provider. |
2016 Proxy Statement | 15 |
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Marvin R. Ellison | ||
| | |
|
Age: 51 Director since: 2014 Committees: Compensation, Nominating & Governance Other public directorships: J. C. Penney Company, Inc. |
|
Mr. Ellison has been Chairman of J. C. Penney Company, Inc., an apparel and home furnishings retailer, since August 1, 2016 and Chief Executive Officer since August 1, 2015.
Mr. Ellison served as President and CEO-Designee of J. C. Penney from November 1, 2014 through July 2015. From August 2008 through October 2014, he served as Executive Vice President U.S. Stores of The Home Depot,
Inc., a home improvement specialty retailer. From June 2002 to August 2008, he served in a variety of operational roles at The Home Depot, including as President Northern Division and as Senior Vice
President Global Logistics. Prior to joining The Home Depot, Mr. Ellison spent 15 years at Target Corporation in a variety of operational roles. He is a former director of H&R Block, Inc. Skills and Qualifications: Transportation Industry: Served in a variety of logistics roles during his career, including as Senior Vice President Global Logistics at The Home Depot. Also has significant e-commerce experience due to his executive positions held at J. C. Penney and The Home Depot. Leadership: Significant
executive leadership experience gained from executive positions held at The Home Depot and J. C. Penney. |
John C. ("Chris") Inglis | ||
| | |
|
Age: 61 Director since: 2015 Committees: Information Technology Oversight, Nominating & Governance Other public directorships: Huntington Bancshares Inc. and KEYW Corp. |
|
Mr. Inglis is currently a Visiting Professor of Cyber Studies at the U.S. Naval Academy. He previously served for 28 years at the National Security Agency as a computer scientist and operational
manager, retiring in 2014 as the Agency's Deputy Director and senior civilian leader. In this role, he acted as the NSA's chief operating officer responsible for guiding and directing strategies, operations and policy. Prior to joining the NSA,
Mr. Inglis had nine years of active duty service as an officer and pilot in the U.S. Air Force, followed by twenty-one years with the Air National Guard, from which he retired as a Brigadier General. Skills and Qualifications: Transportation Industry: Commanded USAF C-130 tactical airlift units at the Squadron and Group level, holds the rating of USAF Command Pilot and has more than 20 years of experience piloting USAF C-141 and C-130 aircraft. International: Has extensive experience conducting intelligence liaison as a senior representative of the U.S. government, including three years as the U.S. Special Liaison to the United Kingdom at U.S. Embassy London. Technology: Serves on technical advisory boards across the private and public sectors and holds graduate degrees in engineering and computer science from Columbia, Johns Hopkins, and George Washington Universities. Government/Leadership: Served for 17 years as a senior executive in the U.S. Department of Defense, including seven and
one half years as the Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer of the NSA. He currently serves as a member of the Strategic Advisory Groups for U.S. Strategic Command and the Director of National Intelligence. |
Kimberly A. Jabal | ||
| | |
|
Age: 47 Director since: 2013 Committees: Audit, Information Technology Oversight Other public directorships: None |
|
Ms. Jabal currently is the Chief Financial Officer and oversees the customer support and human resources functions at Weebly, Inc., a privately-held small business software company. Prior to joining
Weebly in November 2015, she served as Chief Financial Officer of Kong Technologies, Inc. (formerly Path, Inc.) and as Vice President of Finance at Lytro, Inc., both early-stage technology companies. She served in various capacities at
Google from 2003 to 2011, including as director of engineering finance, director of investor relations and director of online sales finance. Prior to Google, Ms. Jabal spent two years at Goldman Sachs in technology investment banking and eight
years with Accenture working in information technology. Skills and Qualifications: Financial: CFO of a privately-held small business software company and former CFO of a privately-held social networking company. Technology: Has extensive information technology experience, having spent eight years serving in various capacities with Google and eight years with Accenture designing
and building technical infrastructure for major IT systems implementations at global companies. |
16 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Shirley Ann Jackson | ||
| | |
|
Age: 70 Director since: 1999 Committees: Compensation, Nominating & Governance Other public directorships: International Business Machines Corporation, Medtronic, Inc. and Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated |
|
Dr. Jackson is President of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), a technological research university, a position she has held since 1999. She was Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) from 1995 to 1999 and Commissioner of the NRC from 1995 to 1999. Dr. Jackson was a member of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) from 2009 until 2014. She has been Co-Chair of the President's Intelligence
Advisory Board since November 2014 and a member of the International Security Advisory Board to the U.S. Secretary of State since July 2011, and she is a life trustee of M.I.T. (member of the M.I.T. Corporation). Dr. Jackson is a National Medal
of Science recipient. She was previously a director of Marathon Oil Corporation, NYSE Euronext and U.S. Steel Corporation. Skills and Qualifications: Financial: Has numerous years of public company audit committee experience, including as a chair.
Dr. Jackson is also a former director of NYSE Euronext and former chair of the Board of NYSE Regulation. Technology: Earned undergraduate and doctorate degrees in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
and is the president of a world-renowned technological research university (RPI). Dr. Jackson is also a member of the Board of IBM and a former member of PCAST. Energy/Government: Former Chairman and Commissioner of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, current Co-Chair of the President's Intelligence Advisory Board and former director of Marathon Oil Corporation. |
R. Brad Martin | ||
| | |
|
Age: 64 Director since: 2011 Committees: Audit, Information Technology Oversight Other public directorships: Chesapeake Energy Corporation (Chairman) and First Horizon National Corporation |
|
Mr. Martin is Chairman of RBM Venture Company, a private investment company, a position he has held since 2007. He also is Chairman of the Board of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, a producer of natural gas
and oil and natural gas liquids, a position he has held since October 2015. Mr. Martin is the former Interim President of the University of Memphis, a position he held from July 2013 until May 2014. Mr. Martin was Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Saks Incorporated from 1989 to 2006 and remained Chairman until 2007, when he retired. He was previously a director of Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Dillards, Inc., Gaylord Entertainment Company, lululemon
athletica inc. and Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Skills and Qualifications: Financial: Earned an MBA from Vanderbilt University and has public company audit committee experience. Marketing: Gained valuable retail marketing experience and successfully applied his marketing expertise as the former CEO of Saks, a leading department store retailer. Energy: Member of the boards of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, where he currently serves as Chairman, and Pilot Travel Centers LLC. Government: Former Tennessee state representative. |
Joshua Cooper Ramo | ||
| | |
|
Age: 47 Director since: 2011 Committees: Audit, Information Technology Oversight Other public directorships: Starbucks Corporation |
|
Mr. Ramo is Vice Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Kissinger Associates, Inc., a strategic advisory firm (he has been Vice Chairman since 2011 and Co-Chief Executive Officer since July 1,
2015). He served as Managing Director of Kissinger Associates from 2006 to 2011. Prior to joining Kissinger Associates, he was Managing Partner of JL Thornton & Co., LLC, a consulting firm. Before that, he worked as a journalist
and served as Senior Editor, Foreign Editor and then Assistant Managing Editor of TIME Magazine from 1995 to 2003. Skills and Qualifications: International: Has been a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Asia 21 Leaders Program,
World Economic Forum's Young Global Leaders and Global Leaders of Tomorrow. He co-founded the U.S.-China Young Leaders Forum in conjunction with the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations. Leadership: Vice Chairman,
Co-Chief Executive Officer, Kissinger Associates. |
2016 Proxy Statement | 17 |
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Susan C. Schwab | ||
| | |
|
Age: 61 Director since: 2009 Committees: Compensation, Information Technology Oversight Other public directorships: The Boeing Company, Caterpillar Inc. and Marriott International, Inc. |
|
Ambassador Schwab is a Professor at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy, a position she has held since January 2009. She has also served as a strategic advisor to Mayer Brown LLP, a law
firm, since March 2010. She served as U.S. Trade Representative from 2006 to January 2009 and as Deputy U.S. Trade Representative from 2005 to 2006. She was Vice Chancellor of the University System of Maryland and President and Chief Executive
Officer of the University System of Maryland Foundation from 2004 to 2005. She was Dean of the University of Maryland School of Public Policy from 1995 to 2003. She was Director of Corporate Business Development of Motorola, Inc., an electronics
manufacturer, from 1993 to 1995. She was Assistant Secretary of Commerce for the U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service from 1989 to 1993. She was previously a director of The Adams Express Company, Calpine Corporation and Petroleum & Resources
Corporation. Skills and Qualifications: International/Government: Former U.S. Trade Representative and former Director-General of the U.S.
and Foreign Commercial Service (Assistant Secretary of Commerce), the export promotion arm of the U.S. government. |
David P. Steiner | ||
| | |
|
Age: 56 Director since: 2009 Committees: Nominating & Governance (Chairman) Other public directorships: Waste Management, Inc. |
|
Mr. Steiner is Chief Executive Officer of Waste Management, Inc., a provider of integrated waste management services, a position he has held since 2004. He was President of Waste Management, Inc.
from 2010 through July 2016, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Waste Management, Inc. from 2003 to 2004, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Waste Management, Inc. from 2001 to 2003, and
Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of Waste Management, Inc. from 2000 to 2001. He was a partner at Phelps Dunbar L.L.P., a law firm, from 1990 to 2000. Mr. Steiner was previously a director of TE Connectivity Ltd. Skills and Qualifications: Transportation: CEO of Waste Management, which transports waste materials. Financial: Has an accounting degree from Louisiana State University and was CFO of Waste Management before becoming its CEO. Energy: CEO of Waste Management, which has taken an industry leadership role in converting
waste to renewable energy. |
Paul S. Walsh | ||
| | |
|
Age: 61 Director since: 1996 Committees: Compensation (Chairman) Other public directorships: Avanti Communications Group plc (Chairman), Compass Group PLC (Chairman), HSBC Holdings plc, Pace Holdings Corp. and RM2 International S.A. |
|
Mr. Walsh is Chairman of the Board of Compass Group PLC, a food service and support services company, a position he has held since February 2014. He also is Chairman of the Board of Avanti
Communications Group plc, a leading satellite operator providing high speed internet and data services, a position he has held since November 2013. Mr. Walsh serves as an advisor for L.E.K. Consulting, a global strategy consulting firm, and
TPG Capital LLP, a private investment firm. Mr. Walsh served as Chief Executive Officer of Diageo plc, a beverage company, from 2000 to June 2013 and then served as an advisor to the company from July 2013 through 2014. Mr. Walsh
also is a director of HSBC Holdings plc, Pace Holdings Corp., RM2 International S.A. and Simpsons Malt Limited, and has been a member of the U.K. Prime Minister's Business Advisory Group since July 2015. He was Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of The Pillsbury Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Diageo plc, from 1996 to 2000, and Chief Executive Officer of The Pillsbury Company from 1992 to 1996. He was appointed as a Business Ambassador on the U.K. government's
Business Ambassador Network in August 2012. He was previously a director of Diageo plc, Centrica plc, Ontex Group NV and Unilever PLC. Skills and Qualifications: International: Former CEO of a U.K.-based, large multinational corporation. Financial: Has held executive finance positions, including CFO of a major division, at a U.K.-based public company. Marketing: Led a company that owes much of its growth and success to highly effective marketing of its brands. Government: Has held executive positions at companies where government interface is crucial. |
18 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Summary of Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Transportation Industry Experience is a positive attribute as it greatly increases a director's understanding of our business operations and its management. |
| · | | · | | · | | · | | · | | | | | · | | | | | · | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
International Experience is beneficial given our continued capitalization on increasing globalization and the resulting expansion of customer access to goods, services and
information. |
| · | | | | · | | | | · | | | | · | | | | · | | · | | | · | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Expertise is important given our use of financial targets as measures of success and the importance of accurate financial reporting and robust internal auditing. |
| | | | · | | | | | · | | · | | · | | | | | · | | · | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Marketing Expertise is valuable because we emphasize promoting and protecting the FedEx brand, one of our most important assets. |
| | | | | | | | | | | · | | | | | | · | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Technological Expertise is beneficial because attracting and retaining customers and competing effectively depend in part upon the sophistication and reliability of our
technology. |
| | · | | · | | | | · | | · | | · | | | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Energy Expertise is important as we are committed to protecting the environment and have initiatives underway to reduce our energy use and minimize our environmental impact. |
| · | | | | | | | | | | · | | · | | | | | · | | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government Experience is useful in our highly-regulated industry as we work constructively with governments around the world. |
| | · | | | | | · | | | | · | | · | | | · | | | · | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leadership Experience is critical because we want directors with the experience and confidence to capably advise our executive management team on a wide range of issues. |
| · | | · | | · | | · | | · | | · | | · | | · | | · | | · | | · | | · |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2016 Proxy Statement | 19 |
Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board approved, that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in FedEx's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016.
Compensation Committee Members
Paul
S. Walsh Chairman
Marvin R. Ellison
Shirley Ann Jackson
Susan C. Schwab
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
In this section we discuss and analyze the compensation of our principal executive and financial officers and our three other most highly compensated executive officers (the "named executive officers") for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016. For additional information regarding compensation of the named executive officers, see " Summary Compensation Table" and other compensation-related tables and disclosure below.
Executive Summary |
During fiscal 2016, we continued to focus on our strategic cost reduction programs, finding ways to improve efficiency and rationalize capacity, improving on our already high levels of service, and continuing to invest in critical, long-term projects as part of our global strategy to position the company for stronger growth. In fiscal 2016, we experienced improved performance by our FedEx Express and FedEx Ground segments. Although our financial performance improved during fiscal 2016, adjusted consolidated operating income was below our aggressive target objective under our fiscal 2016 annual incentive compensation ("AIC") program. Accordingly, and consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, the payouts under our AIC program were below target, except for the AIC payout to David J. Bronczek, the President and Chief Executive Officer of FedEx Express. Because the target objective for FedEx Express segment operating income under the fiscal 2016 AIC plan was exceeded, Mr. Bronczek's AIC payout was only slightly below target (after adjustment, as described below). Maximum payouts were earned in fiscal 2016 by all participants, including the named executive officers, under our long-term incentive compensation ("LTI") program, which is tied to financial performance over a three-year period (fiscal 2014 through fiscal 2016 for the FY2014FY2016 LTI plan).
The following table details key compensation highlights of the last five fiscal years.
20 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Philosophy. FedEx is consistently ranked among the world's most admired and trusted employers and respected brands. Maintaining this reputation and continuing to position FedEx for future success requires high caliber talent to protect and grow the company in support of our mission of producing superior financial returns for our shareowners. We design our executive compensation program to provide a competitive and internally equitable compensation and benefits package that reflects individual and company performance, job complexity, and strategic value of the position while ensuring long-term retention and motivation.
Each of the named executive officers is a longstanding member of our management, and our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Frederick W. Smith, founded the company and pioneered the express transportation industry over 40 years ago. As a result, our named executive officers are especially knowledgeable about our business and our industry and thus particularly valuable to the company and our shareowners.
As with tenure, position and level of responsibility are important factors in the compensation of any FedEx employee, including our named executive officers. There are internal salary ranges for each level, and annual target bonus percentages, long-term bonus amounts, and the number of stock options and restricted shares awarded are all closely tied to management level and responsibilities. For instance, all FedEx Corporation executive vice presidents have the same salary range and annual target bonus percentages and receive the same long-term bonus and the same number of options and restricted shares in the annual grant.
Our philosophy is to (i) closely align the compensation paid to our executives with the performance of the company on both a short-term and long-term basis, and (ii) set performance goals that do not promote excessive risk while supporting the company's core long-term financial goals, which include:
Our executive compensation is, in large measure, highly variable and linked to the above goals and the performance of the FedEx stock price over time.
2015 Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote Outcome |
The Compensation Committee annually considers the results of the most recent advisory vote by shareowners to approve named executive officer compensation. In the 2015 advisory vote, 96.2% of the voted shares supported the compensation of FedEx's named executive officers, and the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors interpret this strong level of support as affirmation of the current design, purposes and direction of FedEx's executive compensation programs. In its ongoing evaluation of FedEx's executive compensation programs and practices, the Compensation Committee will continue to consider the results from future shareowner advisory votes to approve named executive officer compensation.
2016 Proxy Statement | 21 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Objectives and Design-Related Features |
We design our executive compensation program to further FedEx's mission of producing superior financial returns for our shareowners by pursuing the following objectives:
How Pursued |
||||
| | | | |
Objective | Generally | Specifically | ||
| | | | |
Retain and attract highly qualified and effective executive officers. | Pay competitively. | Use comparison survey data as a point of reference in evaluating target levels for total direct compensation, which includes both fixed and variable, at-risk components tied to stock price appreciation and short- and long-term financial performance. | ||
Motivate executive officers to contribute to our future success and to build long-term shareowner value and reward them accordingly. | Link a significant part of compensation to FedEx's financial and stock price performance, especially long-term performance. | Weight executive compensation program in favor of incentive and equity-based compensation elements (rather than base salary), especially long-term incentive cash compensation and equity incentives in the form of stock options and restricted stock. | ||
Further align executive officer and shareowner interests. | Encourage and facilitate long-term shareowner returns and significant ownership of FedEx stock by executives. | Make annual equity-based grants; tie long-term cash compensation to growth in our EPS, which strongly correlates with long-term stock price appreciation; maintain a stock ownership goal for senior officers and encourage each officer to retain shares acquired upon stock option exercises until his or her goal is met. | ||
| | | | |
Commitment to Retain and Attract. FedEx is widely acknowledged as one of the world's most admired and respected companies, and it is our people our greatest asset who have earned FedEx its strong reputation. Because FedEx operates a global enterprise in a highly challenging business environment, we compete for talented management with some of the largest companies in the world in our industry and in others. Our global recognition and reputation for excellence in management and leadership make our people attractive targets for other companies, and our key employees are aggressively recruited. To prevent loss of our managerial talent, we seek to provide an overall compensation program that is competitive with all types of companies and continues to retain and attract outstanding people to conduct our business. Each element of compensation is intended to fulfill this important obligation.
Market Referencing. Because retention is imperative and tenure and management level are determinative factors, we use external survey data solely as a market reference point to assess the competitiveness of our compensation programs. The target compensation levels of our named executive officers are not designed to correspond to a specific percentile of compensation in those surveys. Instead, our analysis considers multiple market reference points for the analyzed positions, rather than referring to a specific percentile.
For the fiscal 2016 executive compensation review, we considered survey data published by two major consulting firms engaged by the company: Willis Towers Watson and Aon Hewitt. Each consulting firm provided target compensation data for general industry companies (excluding financial services companies) in its respective database with annual revenues between $20 billion and $70 billion. A list of these companies is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A.
General industry is the appropriate comparison category because our executives are recruited by and from businesses outside of FedEx's industry peer group. Moreover, our industry peer group does not provide a sufficient number of companies that are of a comparable size to FedEx. Using a robust data sample (112 companies for fiscal 2016) mitigates the impact of outliers, year-over-year volatility of compensation levels and the risk of selection bias, and increases the likelihood of comparing with companies with executive officer positions similar to ours. Because the annual revenues of these companies vary significantly, each consulting firm used regression analysis to allow for the inclusion of data from a large number of both larger and smaller companies. The data results provided by each firm were then averaged to arrive at blended market compensation data for general industry executives.
When we evaluate the elements of compensation of our executive officers in light of the referenced survey data, we
22 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
consider total direct compensation ("TDC"). The TDC composition is illustrated below:
Elements of TDC
| | | | | | | | |
|
Short-Term Compensation |
| Base Salary | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
AIC | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Long-Term Compensation |
| LTI | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
Stock Options | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Restricted Stock (includes related tax payments) | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
TDC includes AIC at target (i.e., assuming achievement of all objectives) and all long-term components at target. Long-term components of target TDC are valued consistent with the valuation methodology used in the referenced surveys. Tax payments on restricted stock awards are included in TDC.
Other elements of compensation of the named executive officers (such as perquisites and retirement benefits) are not included in TDC, consistent with our referenced survey information. Accordingly, these other elements are not referenced against survey data, and decisions as to these other elements do not influence decisions as to the elements of compensation that are included in TDC. These other elements of compensation, however, are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee.
While we may reference our target executive compensation levels against the survey group of companies, we do not compare our AIC and LTI financial performance goals against these companies or any other group of companies. Rather, as discussed below, our AIC and LTI financial performance goals are based upon our internal business objectives which, when set each year, represent aggressive but reasonably achievable goals. Accordingly, the relationship between our financial performance and the financial performance of the survey companies does not affect the relationship between our executive compensation and the executive compensation of that group in a given year.
Pay for Performance. Our executive compensation program is intended not only to retain and attract highly qualified and effective managers, but also to motivate them to substantially contribute to FedEx's future success for the long-term benefit of shareowners and appropriately reward them for doing so. Accordingly, we believe that there should be a strong relationship between pay and corporate performance (both financial results and stock price), and our executive compensation program reflects this belief. In particular, AIC payments, LTI payments and stock options represent a significant portion of our executive compensation program, as shown by the chart below, and this variable compensation is "at risk" and directly dependent upon the achievement of pre-established corporate goals and stock price appreciation:
2016 Proxy Statement | 23 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following chart illustrates for each named executive officer the allocation of fiscal 2016 target TDC between base salary and incentive and equity-oriented compensation elements (the restricted stock value includes the related tax payment):
Fiscal 2016 Target TDC Components
We believe that long-term performance is the most important measure of our success, as we manage FedEx's operations and business for the long-term benefit of our shareowners. Accordingly, not only is our executive compensation program weighted towards variable, at-risk pay components, but we emphasize incentives that are dependent upon long-term corporate performance and stock price appreciation. These long-term incentives include LTI cash compensation and equity awards (stock options and restricted stock), which comprise a significant portion of an executive officer's total compensation. These incentives are designed to motivate and reward our executive officers for achieving long-term corporate financial performance goals and maximizing long-term shareowner value.
The following chart illustrates for each named executive officer the allocation of fiscal 2016 target TDC between long-term incentives LTI, stock options and restricted stock, including the related tax payment and short-term components base salary and AIC:
Fiscal 2016 Long-Term vs. Short-Term Compensation
We include target AIC and LTI payouts (discounted to present value to be consistent with the valuation methodology used in the survey data) in TDC, so the actual compensation paid out in a given year may vary widely from target levels because compensation earned under the AIC and LTI programs is variable and commensurate with
24 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
the level of achievement of pre-established financial performance goals. When we fall short of our business objectives, payments under these variable programs decrease correspondingly. Conversely, when we achieve superior results, we reward our executives accordingly under the terms of these programs. As shown by the following chart, the actual fiscal 2016 TDC of our named executive officers was above target TDC because our financial performance exceeded our pre-established goals for the LTI plan. Conversely, the actual fiscal 2015 TDC of our named executive officers was below target levels because our financial performance fell short of our pre-established goals for the AIC and LTI plans. In fiscal 2014, the actual TDC of our named executive officers was above target levels because we exceeded our pre-established EPS goal for a target payout under the FY2012FY2014 LTI plan.
Actual TDC vs. Target TDC (1)
2016 Proxy Statement | 25 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Align Management and Shareowner Interests. We award stock options and restricted stock to create and maintain a long-term economic stake in the company for the officers, thereby aligning their interests with the interests of our shareowners.
In addition, as discussed above, payout under our LTI program is dependent upon achievement of an aggregate EPS goal for a three-fiscal-year period. EPS was selected as the financial measure for the LTI plan because growth in our EPS strongly correlates to long-term stock price appreciation.
The following graph illustrates the relationship between FedEx's EPS growth and stock price appreciation (based on the fiscal year-end stock price and adjusted for stock splits) from 1978 to 2016:
Stock Ownership Goal for Senior Officers. In order to encourage significant stock ownership by FedEx's senior management, including the named executive officers, and to further align their interests with the interests of our shareowners, the Board of Directors has adopted a stock ownership goal for senior officers, which is included in FedEx's Corporate Governance Guidelines. With respect to our executive officers, the goal is that within four years after being appointed to his or her position, each officer own FedEx shares valued at the following multiple of his or her annual base salary:
For purposes of meeting this goal, unvested restricted stock is counted, but unexercised stock options are not. Until the ownership goal is met, the officer is encouraged to retain "net profit shares" resulting from the exercise of stock options. Net profit shares are the shares remaining after payment of the option exercise price and taxes owed upon the exercise of options. As of August 1, 2016, each executive officer exceeded the stock ownership goal.
Policy Against Hedging and Pledging Transactions. In addition, we have adopted comprehensive and detailed policies (the FedEx Securities Manual) that regulate trading by our insiders, including the named executive officers and Board members. The Securities Manual includes information regarding quiet periods and explains when transactions in FedEx stock are permitted. The Securities Manual and our Corporate Governance Guidelines also set forth certain types
26 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
of transactions that are restricted. Specifically, (1) publicly traded (or exchange-traded) options, such as puts, calls and other derivative securities, (2) short sales, including "sales against the box," and (3) hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, are strictly prohibited. The Securities Manual and our Corporate Governance Guidelines also prohibit margin accounts and pledges; provided, however, that our Lead Independent Director and General Counsel, acting together, may grant an exception to the prohibition against holding FedEx securities in a margin account or pledging FedEx securities on a case-by-case basis to any member of the Board of Directors or the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer if he or she clearly demonstrates the financial capacity to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities.
Based upon this criterion, such an exception has been granted with respect to the shares that are disclosed in this proxy statement as having been pledged as security by Frederick W. Smith, FedEx's Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Enterprise. See "Stock Ownership Directors and Executive Officers." With respect to the shares pledged by Mr. Smith and Enterprise as of August 2, 2016:
We have an active shareowner engagement program in which we meet regularly with our largest shareowners. During these discussions, none of our largest shareowners have raised any concerns regarding Mr. Smith's pledged shares.
No other FedEx executive officer or Board member currently holds FedEx securities that are pledged pursuant to a margin account, loan or otherwise.
Restricted Stock Program. FedEx's restricted stock program has been in place for over 25 years and has encouraged FedEx executives to own and retain company stock. Although none of our largest shareowners have raised any concerns to us regarding our restricted stock program, during fiscal 2016 the Compensation Committee again reviewed our restricted stock program and, for all of the following reasons, determined that it continues to be appropriate for FedEx.
By facilitating the ownership of FedEx shares by our executives, we strengthen the alignment of their interests with those of our investors. When granting restricted stock, FedEx first determines the total target value of the award and then approves the delivery of that value in two components: restricted shares and cash payment of taxes due. Therefore, the total target value of the award is the same as it would be if there were no tax payments. In particular, because the amount of the tax payment is included in the calculation of the target value of the restricted stock award, the officers receive fewer shares in each award than they would in the absence of the tax payment: fewer by an amount equal in value to the tax payment.
This methodology prevents the need for an officer to make a disposition of FedEx stock to cover the tax consequences of a restricted stock award and dilute his or her interest in FedEx. Conversely, absent the tax payment, the number of shares received in each award would be larger by an amount equal in value to the forgone tax payment, thereby having a dilutive effect on our shareowners' equity interest in FedEx. While SEC disclosure rules require that these payments be included with tax reimbursement payments and reported as "other compensation" in the Summary Compensation Table, we do not believe these payments are "tax gross-ups" in the traditional sense, since their value is fully reflected in the number of shares ultimately delivered to recipients. The following chart illustrates this principle, using the target value for the fiscal year 2016 restricted stock awards granted to FedEx Corporation executive vice presidents (as in previous years, Mr. Smith did not receive a restricted stock award in fiscal 2016):
2016 Proxy Statement | 27 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Target Value of Restricted Stock Award
Not only is the value to the officer, as well as the cost to the company, generally the same as it would be otherwise, but this practice uses fewer shares of stock to arrive at the same benefit and has proved extremely successful in retaining executives and enabling them to retain their shares. During fiscal 2014, we broadened our restricted stock program to include certain lower-level officers and high-performing managers and individual contributors. We also make tax payments as part of restricted stock awards to these individuals. In sum, we strongly believe that our restricted stock program is effectively designed and is aligned with the best interests of our shareowners.
Role of the Compensation Committee, its Compensation Consultant and the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Our Board of Directors is responsible for the compensation of our executive management. The purpose of the Board's Compensation Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors, is to help discharge this responsibility by, among other things:
The Compensation Committee may form and delegate authority to any subcommittee as it deems appropriate or advisable in accordance with the terms of its written charter. To date, however, the Committee has not formed or delegated authority to any subcommittee.
In furtherance of the Compensation Committee's responsibility, the Committee has engaged Steven Hall & Partners (the "consultant") to assist the Committee in evaluating FedEx's executive compensation, including
28 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
during fiscal 2016. In connection with this engagement, the consultant reports directly and exclusively to the Committee. The consultant participates in Committee meetings, reviews Committee materials and provides advice to the Committee upon its request. For example, the consultant: updates the Committee on trends and issues in executive compensation and comments on the competitiveness and reasonableness of FedEx's executive compensation program; assists the Committee in the development and review of FedEx's AIC and LTI programs, including commenting on performance measures and the goal-setting process; and reviews and provides advice to the Committee for its consideration in reviewing compensation-related proxy statement disclosure, including this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and on any new equity compensation plans or plan amendments proposed for adoption.
Other than services provided to the Compensation Committee, the consultant does not perform any services for FedEx. Additionally, the consultant has robust policies and procedures in place to prevent conflicts of interest; the fees received by the consultant from FedEx in the consultant's most recently completed fiscal year represented less than 5% of the consultant's revenues; neither the consultant nor any adviser of the consultant had a business or personal relationship with any member of the Compensation Committee or any executive officer of FedEx during fiscal 2016; and no adviser of the consultant directly owns, or directly owned during fiscal 2016, any FedEx stock. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has determined the consultant to be independent from the company and that no conflicts of interest exist related to the consultant's services provided to the Committee. Compensation Committee pre-approval is required for any services to be provided to the company by the Committee's independent compensation consultant. This ensures that the consultant maintains the highest level of independence from the company, in both appearance and fact.
The Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, who attends most meetings of the Compensation Committee by invitation of the Committee's chairman, assists the Committee in determining the compensation of all other executive officers by, among other things:
The other executive officers do not have a role in determining their own compensation, other than discussing their annual individual performance objectives and results achieved with the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Compensation Elements and Fiscal 2016 Amounts |
Base Salary. Our primary objective with respect to the base salary levels of our executive officers is to provide sufficient fixed cash income to retain and attract these highly marketable executives in a competitive market for executive talent. The base salaries of our executive officers are reviewed and adjusted (if appropriate) at least annually to reflect, among other things, economic conditions, base salaries for comparable positions from the executive compensation survey data discussed above, the tenure of the officers, and the base salaries of the officers relative to one another, as well as the internal salary ranges for the officer's level.
Effective October 1, 2015, Frederick W. Smith's annual base salary was increased by 1.5%, and each other named executive officer's annual base salary was increased by 3%. Effective October 1, 2016, each named executive officer's annual base salary will be increased by 3%. As a result, effective October 1, 2016, the new annual base salaries of FedEx's named executive officers will be as follows:
Name |
Current Annual Base Salary ($) |
New Annual Base Salary ($) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | |
F.W. Smith |
| 1,285,968 | | 1,324,548 | |||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
929,868 | 957,768 | |||||
D.J. Bronczek |
| 970,356 | | 999,468 | |||
T.M. Glenn |
858,360 | 884,112 | |||||
R.B. Carter |
| 785,844 | | 809,424 | |||
| | | | | | | |
2016 Proxy Statement | 29 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Cash Payments Under Annual Incentive Compensation Program. The primary objective of our AIC program is to motivate our people to achieve our annual financial goals and other business objectives and reward them accordingly. The program provides an annual cash bonus opportunity to our employees, including the named executive officers, at the conclusion of each fiscal year based upon the achievement of AIC performance objectives.
For fiscal 2016, the AIC plan for the named executive officers included two company financial performance measures FedEx Express segment operating income and consolidated operating income. These measures were chosen as the company financial performance metrics in order to provide a greater tie between individual business segment performance and to continue to motivate and incentivize management to improve the company's core financial performance, execute our profit improvement initiatives and find ways to improve efficiency and rationalize capacity.
Target AIC payouts are established as a percentage of the executive officer's base salary actually paid during the fiscal year. Payouts above target levels are based exclusively upon the company's performance. Accordingly, the executive officer receives above-target payouts only if the company exceeds the AIC target objective for annual financial performance.
AIC objectives for company annual financial performance are typically based upon our business plan for the fiscal year, which is reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors and which reflects, among other things, the risks and opportunities identified in connection with our enterprise risk management process. Consistent with our long-term focus and in order to discourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking, we measure performance against our business plan, rather than a fixed growth rate or an average of growth rates from prior years, to account for short-term economic and competitive conditions and anticipated strategic investments that may have adverse short-term profit implications. We address year-over-year improvement targets through our LTI plans, as discussed below.
The fiscal 2016 AIC target payouts for the named executive officers, as a percentage of base salary, were as follows:
Name |
Target Payout (as a percentage of base salary) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
F.W. Smith |
| 130% | ||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
90% | |||
D.J. Bronczek |
| 100% | ||
T.M. Glenn |
90% | |||
R.B. Carter |
| 90% | ||
| | | | |
The maximum fiscal 2016 AIC payout opportunity for each named executive officer was 200% of his target bonus.
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Smith's AIC payout is tied to the achievement of corporate objectives for company financial performance for the fiscal year. Mr. Smith's minimum AIC payout is zero. His target AIC payout is set as a percentage of his base salary, and his maximum AIC payout is set as a multiple of the target payout. The independent members of the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approve these percentages. The actual AIC payout ranges, on a sliding scale, from the minimum to the maximum based upon the performance of the company against our company financial performance goals.
Mr. Smith's fiscal 2016 AIC payout was based on the following company financial performance measures (subject to adjustment as described below):
In addition, the independent Board members, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, may adjust this amount upward or downward based on their annual evaluation of Mr. Smith's performance, including the
30 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
quality and effectiveness of his leadership, the execution of key strategic initiatives and the following corporate performance measures:
None of these factors is given any particular weight in determining whether to adjust Mr. Smith's bonus amount.
Non-CEO Named Executive Officers. Mr. Bronczek's fiscal 2016 AIC target payout opportunity was based on the achievement of corporate objectives for FedEx Express segment operating income for fiscal 2016. The FedEx Express segment operating income target objective under the fiscal 2016 AIC program was the same as the fiscal 2016 business plan objective for FedEx Express segment operating income. Above-target payouts for Mr. Bronczek were tied to the achievement of corporate objectives for consolidated operating income (excluding the MTM Adjustment), subject to the maximum payout opportunity and any adjustment by Mr. Smith, as described below. Mr. Bronczek's fiscal 2016 AIC payout opportunity was not subject to a floor.
The fiscal 2016 AIC payout opportunity for each of Messrs. Graf, Glenn and Carter was based on the achievement of corporate objectives for consolidated operating income (excluding the MTM Adjustment), subject to a minimum payout of 50% of his target payout (as it may be adjusted by Mr. Smith as described below) and the maximum payout opportunity.
The target AIC payout for each non-CEO named executive officer is set as a percentage of the executive's base salary, and the maximum AIC payout is set as a multiple of the target payout. The actual AIC payout ranges, on a sliding scale, from the minimum to the maximum based upon the performance of the individual and the company against the objectives.
Mr. Smith may adjust each officer's bonus amount based on the achievement of individual performance objectives established at the beginning of the fiscal year. Individual performance objectives for the non-CEO named executive officers vary by management level and by operating segment and include (but are not limited to):
Individual performance objectives are designed to further the company's business objectives. Achievement of individual performance objectives is generally within each officer's control or scope of responsibility, and the objectives are intended to be achieved with an appropriate level of effort and effective leadership by the officer. The achievement level of each non-CEO named executive officer's individual performance objectives is based on Mr. Smith's evaluation at the conclusion of the fiscal year, which is reviewed by the Compensation Committee.
Adjustments to Consolidated Operating Income for Fiscal 2016 AIC Plan Purposes. FedEx's consolidated operating income results for fiscal 2016 were impacted by several charges and other items that did not reflect core business performance. In order to ensure that payouts under the AIC plan accurately reflected the company's core financial performance, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adjusted consolidated operating income to remove the impact of the following items for purposes of the fiscal 2016 AIC plan:
2016 Proxy Statement | 31 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Additionally, in June 2015, the Board approved the exclusion of the MTM Adjustment from the fiscal 2016 AIC program and future AIC programs.
Fiscal 2016 AIC Performance and Payouts. As noted above, both the FedEx Express segment operating income target objective and the consolidated operating income target objective under the fiscal 2016 AIC program were the same as the corresponding fiscal 2016 business plan objectives.
The following table presents the threshold, target and maximum objectives (if applicable) for FedEx Express segment operating income and consolidated operating income under our fiscal 2016 AIC program, and our actual FedEx Express segment operating income and consolidated operating income (as adjusted) for fiscal 2016 (in millions):
Company Performance Measure |
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
Actual |
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FedEx Express Segment Operating Income |
| $2,442 | (1) | | $2,442 | (1) | | n/a | (1) | | $2,519 | |||
Adjusted Consolidated Operating Income |
n/a | (2) | $5,208 | $5,649 | $5,014 | (3) | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Based upon achievement of the FedEx Express operating income target objective and below-target adjusted consolidated operating income performance, Mr. Smith's fiscal 2016 performance, and each non-CEO named executive officer's achievement of individual performance objectives, payouts to the named executive officers under the fiscal 2016 AIC program were as follows (compared to the target payout opportunities):
Name |
| Target AIC Payout ($) |
| Actual AIC Payout ($) |
| ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | ||
F.W. Smith |
| 1,663,522 | | 1,360,950 | | ||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
| 828,756 | | 609,351 | | ||
D.J. Bronczek |
| 960,936 | | 951,327 | | ||
T.M. Glenn |
| 765,025 | | 539,297 | | ||
R.B. Carter |
| 700,394 | | 477,809 | | ||
| | | | | |
The independent members of the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, exercised their discretion (as described above) to increase the amount of Mr. Smith's fiscal 2016 AIC payout to $1,360,950 from $1,260,950 (the formulaic amount based upon below-target adjusted consolidated operating income performance under the fiscal 2016 AIC program). This decision was based upon their assessment of the outstanding quality and effectiveness of Mr. Smith's leadership during fiscal 2016, the achievement of the FedEx Express profit improvement goals and the successful completion of the TNT Express acquisition.
Fiscal 2017 AIC Plan Design. In order to continue to provide a greater tie between individual business segment performance, and to incentivize management to improve the company's core financial performance and find ways to improve efficiency, several changes have been made to the fiscal 2017 AIC program.
As in prior years, Mr. Smith's fiscal 2017 AIC payout opportunity will be tied to the achievement of corporate objectives for company financial performance for the fiscal year, subject to adjustment by the independent members of the Board of Directors as described above. Mr. Smith's fiscal 2017 AIC payout will be based on the achievement of corporate objectives for consolidated operating income (excluding fiscal 2017 TNT Express integration expenses and financial results and the MTM Adjustment (the "2017 Adjustments")), subject to the maximum payout opportunity. The consolidated operating income target objective under the fiscal 2017 AIC program is the same as the fiscal 2017 business plan objective for consolidated operating income (excluding, in each case, the 2017 Adjustments). Subject to
32 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
any adjustment by the independent directors as described above, Mr. Smith's minimum fiscal 2017 AIC payout will be 50% of his target payout.
Mr. Bronczek's fiscal 2017 AIC target payout opportunity will be based on the achievement of corporate objectives for FedEx Express segment operating income for fiscal 2017. The FedEx Express segment operating income target objective under the fiscal 2017 AIC program is the same as the fiscal 2017 business plan objective for FedEx Express segment operating income. Above-target payouts for Mr. Bronczek will be tied to the achievement of corporate objectives for consolidated operating income (excluding the 2017 Adjustments), subject to the maximum payout opportunity. Mr. Bronczek's minimum fiscal 2017 AIC payout will be 50% of his target payout (as it may be adjusted by Mr. Smith as described below).
The fiscal 2017 AIC payout opportunity for each of Messrs. Graf, Glenn and Carter will be based on the achievement of corporate objectives for consolidated operating income (excluding the 2017 Adjustments), subject to a minimum payout of 50% of his target payout (as it may be adjusted by Mr. Smith as described below) and the maximum payout opportunity.
Mr. Smith may adjust each officer's bonus amount based on the achievement of individual performance objectives established at the beginning of the fiscal year. Mr. Smith will determine the achievement level of each officer's individual objectives at the conclusion of fiscal 2017.
The fiscal 2017 AIC target payouts for the named executive officers, as a percentage of their respective base salary actually paid during fiscal 2017, are as follows:
Name |
Target Payout (as a percentage of base salary) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
F.W. Smith |
| 140% | ||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
100% | |||
D.J. Bronczek |
| 110% | ||
T.M. Glenn |
100% | |||
R.B. Carter |
| 100% | ||
| | | | |
The maximum fiscal 2017 AIC payout opportunity for each named executive officer will be 200% of his target bonus.
Cash Payments Under LTI Program. The primary objective of our LTI program is to motivate management to contribute to our future success and to build long-term shareowner value and reward them accordingly. The program provides a long-term cash payment opportunity to members of management, including the named executive officers, based upon achievement of aggregate EPS goals for the preceding three-fiscal-year period. The LTI plan design provides for payouts that correspond to specific EPS goals established by the Board of Directors. The EPS goals represent total growth in EPS (over a base year) for the three-year term of the LTI plan. The following chart illustrates the relationship between EPS growth and payout:
LTI Payout Opportunity
(as a percentage of target)
2016 Proxy Statement | 33 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As illustrated by the above chart, the LTI program provides for:
Stock Repurchase Program-Related Adjustments to EPS for LTI Plan Purposes. During fiscal 2014 and the first quarter of fiscal 2015, the company repurchased 42.2 million shares as part of our then-existing stock repurchase program. During fiscal 2016, the company repurchased 18.2 million shares. Because the positive impact on EPS resulting from these stock repurchases did not reflect core business performance, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved the exclusion of the impact of the stock repurchases (net of interest expense on debt issued to fund a portion of the stock repurchase programs) on fiscal 2014, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 EPS for purposes of the FY2014FY2016, FY2015FY2017 and FY2016FY2018 LTI plans, as applicable.
As a result, (i) adjusted fiscal 2014 EPS of $6.68, rather than fiscal 2014 EPS of $6.75 (as originally reported before the company's adoption of mark-to-market ("MTM") accounting for its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans), (ii) adjusted fiscal 2015 EPS of $8.24, rather than adjusted fiscal 2015 EPS of $8.87 and (iii) adjusted fiscal 2016 EPS of $9.84 (reflecting the share repurchases made during fiscal 2014, the first quarter of fiscal 2015 and all of fiscal 2016) rather than adjusted fiscal 2016 EPS of $10.80 is being used for purposes of the FY2014FY2016 plan. Additionally, adjusted fiscal 2016 EPS of $10.60 (reflecting share repurchases made during fiscal 2016), rather than adjusted fiscal 2016 EPS of $10.80, is being used for purposes of the FY2015FY2017 and FY2016FY2018 LTI plans. See Appendix B for a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Mark-to-Market Accounting and Other Adjustments to EPS for LTI Plan Purposes. The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved the exclusion of certain items from fiscal 2015 EPS for purposes of FedEx's FY2014FY2016 and FY2015FY2017 LTI plans and for establishing the base-year EPS for the FY2016FY2018 LTI plan. Similarly, the Board approved certain exclusions from fiscal 2016 EPS for purposes of the FY2014FY2016, FY2015FY2017 and FY2016FY2018 LTI plans and for purposes of establishing the base-year EPS for the FY2017FY2019 plan.
For purposes of the applicable plans, fiscal 2015 EPS was adjusted to exclude: (i) the net impact of the company's adoption of MTM accounting for its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans, including the impact of lowering the expected return on plan assets assumption from 7.75% to 6.5% in the presentation of segment results for all prior periods; (ii) aircraft impairment and related charges recorded in the fourth quarter; and (iii) a charge in the fourth quarter to increase the legal reserve associated with the settlement of a legal matter at FedEx Ground to the amount of the settlement.
In addition to the MTM Adjustment that was previously approved by the Board, fiscal 2016 EPS was adjusted for purposes of the applicable plans to exclude: (i) expenses in connection with the settlement of and certain expected losses relating to independent contractor litigation matters involving FedEx Ground, net of recognized immaterial insurance recovery; (ii) expenses related to the settlement of a U.S. Customs and Border Protection matter involving FedEx Trade Networks, net of recognized immaterial insurance recovery; (iii) expenses associated with the acquisition, financing and integration of TNT Express, net of any tax impact, and TNT Express's fiscal 2016 financial results; and (iv) the favorable income tax benefit from an internal corporate restructuring to facilitate the integration of FedEx Express and TNT Express.
As a result, adjusted fiscal 2015 EPS of $8.87, rather than reported fiscal 2015 EPS of $3.65, is being used for purposes of the FY2014FY2016 and FY2015FY2017 LTI plans (as described above, for the FY2014FY2016 LTI plan, $8.87 is further adjusted to $8.24 to account for the effect of stock repurchases). In addition, $8.87 is the base-year EPS for the FY2016FY2018 LTI plan. Adjusted fiscal 2016 EPS of $10.80, rather than reported fiscal 2016 EPS of $6.51, is being used for purposes of the FY2014FY2016, FY2015FY2017 and FY2016FY2018 LTI plans (as described above, for the FY2014FY2016 LTI plan, $10.80 is further adjusted to $9.84 to account for the effect of stock repurchases, and for the FY2015FY2017 and FY2016FY2018 plans, $10.80 is further adjusted to $10.60 to account for the effect of stock repurchases). Finally, adjusted fiscal 2016 EPS of $10.80 will be the base-year EPS for the FY2017FY2019 LTI plan. The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, determined that, by excluding these items, payouts, if any, under these plans will more accurately reflect FedEx's core financial performance in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016. See Appendix B for a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Because the MTM Adjustment is not reflective of core business performance, the Board of Directors, upon the
34 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
recommendation of the Compensation Committee, previously determined that the MTM Adjustment will be excluded from fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017 EPS for purposes of the FY2014FY2016 and FY2015FY2017 LTI plans and from EPS calculations under all future LTI plans, beginning with the FY2016FY2018 LTI plan.
Fiscal 2016 LTI Performance and Payouts. For the FY2014FY2016 LTI plan, we used fiscal 2013 EPS as originally reported before the company's adoption of MTM accounting for its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans ($4.91) as the base-year number. The following table presents the aggregate EPS threshold (minimum), target and maximum under our FY2014FY2016 LTI plan, which was established by the Board of Directors in 2013, and our adjusted aggregate EPS under the plan for the three-year period ended May 31, 2016:
Performance Measure |
| Threshold |
| Target |
| Maximum |
| Actual |
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||
FY2014FY2016 Aggregate Adjusted EPS |
| $16.25 | | | $ | 18.72 | | | $19.61 | | $ | 24.76 * | | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
Based upon this above-target performance, we made the following LTI payouts to the named executive officers, under the FY2014FY2016 LTI plan as illustrated by the following table (compared to the threshold, target and maximum payout opportunities):
Name |
| Threshold LTI Payout ($) |
| Target LTI Payout ($) |
| Maximum LTI Payout ($) |
| Actual LTI Payout ($) |
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | ||||
F.W. Smith |
| 1,000,000 | | 4,000,000 | | 6,000,000 | | 6,000,000 | | ||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
| 300,000 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,800,000 | | 1,800,000 | | ||||
D.J. Bronczek |
| 375,000 | | 1,500,000 | | 2,250,000 | | 2,250,000 | | ||||
T.M. Glenn |
| 300,000 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,800,000 | | 1,800,000 | | ||||
R.B. Carter |
| 300,000 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,800,000 | | 1,800,000 | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | |
LTI Payout Opportunities. The Board of Directors has established LTI plans for the three-fiscal-year periods 2015 through 2017, 2016 through 2018 and 2017 through 2019, providing cash payment opportunities upon the conclusion of fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, if certain EPS goals are achieved with respect to those periods.
Typically, the base-year number over which the three-year average annual EPS growth rate goals are measured for an LTI plan is the final full-year EPS of the preceding fiscal year. For the FY2015FY2017 LTI plan, however, the base-year year number is $7.12, not fiscal 2014 EPS of $6.75 as originally reported before the company's adoption of MTM accounting. The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved this increase in the base-year EPS in order to exclude the impact of the company's stock repurchase program on a prospective basis. The base-year EPS over which the three-year average annual EPS growth rate goals will be measured for the FY2016FY2018 LTI plan is $8.87 (as discussed above). The base-year EPS over which the three-year average annual EPS growth rate goals will be measured for the FY2017FY2019 LTI plan is $10.80 (as discussed above).
As described above, adjusted fiscal 2015 EPS of $8.87 is being used for purpose of the FY2015FY2017 LTI Plan and adjusted fiscal 2016 EPS of $10.60 (which excludes the $0.20 impact of fiscal 2016 stock repurchases) is being used for purposes of the FY2015FY2017 and FY2016FY2018 LTI plans. The following table presents the aggregate EPS thresholds, targets and maximums under the FY2015FY2017 and FY2016FY2018 LTI plans and our progress toward these goals as of May 31, 2016:
Performance Period |
| Aggregate EPS Threshold |
| Aggregate EPS Target |
| Aggregate EPS Maximum |
| Actual Aggregate Adjusted EPS as of May 31, 2016 * |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | ||||||
FY2015FY2017 |
| | $ | 23.57 | | | $ | 27.16 | | | $ | 28.44 | | $19.47 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | (with one year remaining) | |||
| | | | | | | | | ||||||
FY2016FY2018 |
| | $ | 29.36 | | | $ | 33.84 | | | $ | 35.42 | | $10.60 |
|
| | | | | | | (with two years remaining) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
2016 Proxy Statement | 35 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the potential threshold, target and maximum payouts for the named executive officers under the FY2015FY2017, FY2016FY2018 and FY2017FY2019 LTI plans.
|
| | Potential Future Payouts |
| |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | ||||
Name |
| Performance Period |
| Threshold ($) |
| Target ($) |
| Maximum ($) |
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | ||||
F.W. Smith |
| FY2015FY2017 | | 1,000,000 | | 4,000,000 | | 6,000,000 | | ||||
|
| FY2016FY2018 | | 1,000,000 | | 4,000,000 | | 6,000,000 | | ||||
|
| FY2017FY2019 | | 1,150,000 | | 4,600,000 | | 6,900,000 | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | ||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
| FY2015FY2017 | | 300,000 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,800,000 | | ||||
|
| FY2016FY2018 | | 300,000 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,800,000 | | ||||
|
| FY2017FY2019 | | 343,750 | | 1,375,000 | | 2,062,500 | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | ||||
D.J. Bronczek |
| FY2015FY2017 | | 375,000 | | 1,500,000 | | 2,250,000 | | ||||
|
| FY2016FY2018 | | 375,000 | | 1,500,000 | | 2,250,000 | | ||||
|
| FY2017FY2019 | | 437,500 | | 1,750,000 | | 2,625,000 | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | ||||
T.M. Glenn |
| FY2015FY2017 | | 300,000 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,800,000 | | ||||
|
| FY2016FY2018 | | 300,000 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,800,000 | | ||||
|
| FY2017FY2019 | | 343,750 | | 1,375,000 | | 2,062,500 | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | ||||
R.B. Carter |
| FY2015FY2017 | | 300,000 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,800,000 | | ||||
|
| FY2016FY2018 | | 300,000 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,800,000 | | ||||
|
| FY2017FY2019 | | 343,750 | | 1,375,000 | | 2,062,500 | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Equity Incentives Stock Options and Restricted Stock. Our primary objective in providing long-term equity incentives to executive officers is to further align their interests with those of our shareowners by facilitating significant ownership of FedEx stock by the officers. This creates a direct link between their compensation and long-term shareowner return.
Amount. Stock options and restricted stock are generally granted to executive officers on an annual basis. As discussed above, an officer's position and level of responsibility are the primary factors that determine the number of options and shares of restricted stock awarded to the officer in the annual grant. For instance, all FedEx Corporation executive vice presidents receive the same number of options and restricted shares in the annual grant.
The number of stock options and restricted shares awarded at each management level can vary from year to year. In determining how many options and shares of restricted stock should be awarded at each level, the Compensation Committee may consider:
Other factors that the Compensation Committee may consider, especially with respect to special grants outside of the annual-grant framework, include the promotion of an officer or the desire to retain a valued executive or recognize a particular officer's contributions. None of these factors is given any particular weight and the specific factors used may vary among individual executives.
Timing. In selecting dates for awarding equity-based compensation, we do not consider, nor have we ever considered, the price of FedEx's common stock or the timing of the release of material, non-public information about the company. Stock option and restricted stock awards are generally made to executive officers on an annual basis according to a pre-established schedule.
When the Compensation Committee approves a special grant outside of the annual-grant framework, such grants are made at a regularly scheduled meeting and the grant date of the awards is the approval date or the next business day, if the meeting does not fall on a business day. If the grant is made in connection with the promotion of an individual or the election of an officer, the grant date may be the effective date of the individual's promotion or the
36 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
officer's election, if such effective date is after the approval date.
Pricing. The exercise price of stock options granted under our equity incentive plans is equal to the fair market value of FedEx's common stock on the date of grant. Under the terms of our equity incentive plans, the fair market value on the grant date is defined as the average of the high and low trading prices of FedEx's stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that day. We believe this methodology is the most equitable method for determining the exercise price of our stock option awards given the intra-day price volatility often shown by our stock.
Vesting. Stock options and restricted stock granted to executive officers generally vest ratably over four years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. This four-year vesting period is intended to further encourage the retention of the executive officers, since unvested stock options are forfeited upon termination of the officer's employment for any reason other than death or permanent disability and unvested restricted stock is forfeited upon termination of the officer's employment for any reason other than death, permanent disability or retirement.
Tax Payments for Restricted Stock Awards. As discussed previously, FedEx pays the taxes resulting from a restricted stock award on behalf of the recipient. This prevents the need for the officer to sell a portion of a stock award to pay the corresponding tax obligation and thus encourages and facilitates FedEx stock ownership by our officers, thereby further aligning their interests with those of our shareowners. The total target value of the award is the same as it would be if there were no tax payments.
Voting and Dividend Rights on Restricted Stock. Holders of restricted shares are entitled to vote and receive any dividends on such shares. The dividend rights are included in the computation of the value of the restricted stock award for purposes of determining the recipient's target TDC.
Fiscal 2016 Awards. On June 8, 2015, the named executive officers were granted stock option and restricted stock awards as follows:
Name |
| Number of Stock Options |
| Number of Shares of Restricted Stock |
| ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | ||
F.W. Smith |
| 132,520 | | 0 | | ||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
| 16,010 | | 3,450 | | ||
D.J. Bronczek |
| 21,230 | | 4,445 | | ||
T.M. Glenn |
| 16,010 | | 3,450 | | ||
R.B. Carter |
| 16,010 | | 3,450 | | ||
| | | | | |
As in previous years, at the request of Mr. Smith and in light of his significant stock ownership, the Compensation Committee did not award him any restricted stock. Instead, his equity awards were in the form of stock options, which will yield value to him only if the stock price increases from the date of grant.
The target value of stock options and restricted stock awarded in fiscal 2016 to each named executive officer remained substantially the same compared to the fiscal 2015 target value (although the valuation methodology of stock options for accounting purposes and reporting in the Summary Compensation Table may yield a higher value).
Perquisites, Tax Payments and Other Annual Compensation. FedEx's named executive officers receive certain other annual compensation, including:
We provide this other compensation to enhance the competitiveness of our executive compensation program and to increase the productivity (corporate aircraft travel, professional assistance with tax return preparation and financial planning), safety (security services and equipment) and health (annual physical examinations) of our executives so they can focus on producing superior financial returns for our shareowners. Our tax payments relating to restricted stock awards are a component of the total target value of the restricted stock grant. As a result, the total target value of the award is the same as it would be if there were no tax payments and there is no dilutive effect on our shareowners' equity interest in FedEx. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves each of these elements of compensation, and all of the independent directors approve each element as it relates to Mr. Smith. The Committee also reviews and approves
2016 Proxy Statement | 37 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
FedEx's policies and procedures regarding perquisites and other personal benefits and tax payments, including:
FedEx's executive security procedures, which prescribe the level of personal security to be provided to the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, are based on bona fide business-related security concerns and are an integral part of FedEx's overall risk management and security program. These procedures have been assessed by an independent security consulting firm, and deemed necessary and appropriate for the protection of the officers and their families given the history of direct security threats against FedEx executives and the likelihood of additional threats against the officers. The security services and equipment provided to FedEx executive officers may be viewed as conveying personal benefits to the executives and, as a result, their values must be reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
With respect to Mr. Smith, consistent with FedEx's executive security procedures, the Board of Directors requires him to use FedEx corporate aircraft for all travel, including personal travel. In addition, FedEx provides certain physical and personal security services for Mr. Smith, including on-site residential security at his primary residence. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Smith's personal safety and security are of the utmost importance to FedEx and its shareowners and, therefore, the costs associated with such security are appropriate and necessary business expenses.
Post-Employment Compensation. While none of FedEx's named executive officers has an employment agreement, they are entitled to receive certain payments and benefits upon termination of employment or a change of control of FedEx, including:
The Compensation Committee approves and recommends Board approval of all plans, agreements and arrangements that provide for these payments and benefits.
Risks Arising from Compensation Policies and Practices |
Management has conducted an in-depth risk assessment of FedEx's compensation policies and practices and concluded they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and concurred with management's conclusion. The risk assessment process included, among other things, a review of (i) all key incentive compensation plans to ensure that they are aligned with our pay-for-performance philosophy and include performance metrics that meet and support corporate goals, and (ii) the overall compensation mix to ensure an appropriate balance between fixed and variable pay components and between short-term and long-term incentives. The objective of the process was to identify any compensation plans and practices that may encourage employees to take unnecessary risks that could threaten the company. No such plans or practices were identified.
38 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Tax Deductibility of Compensation |
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the income tax deduction by FedEx for compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the three other highest-paid executive officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer) to $1,000,000 per year, unless the compensation is "qualified performance-based compensation" or qualifies under certain other exceptions.
We do not require all of our compensation programs to be fully deductible under Section 162(m) because doing so would restrict our discretion and flexibility in designing competitive compensation programs to promote varying corporate goals. We believe that our Board of Directors should be free to make compensation decisions to further and promote the best interests of our shareowners, rather than to qualify for corporate tax deductions. In fiscal 2016, we incurred approximately $7.2 million of additional tax expense as a result of the Section 162(m) deductibility limit for compensation paid to Mr. Smith and the three other highest-paid executive officers (other than Mr. Graf).
2016 Proxy Statement | 39 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In this section we provide certain tabular and narrative information regarding the compensation of our principal executive and financial officers and our three other most highly compensated executive officers for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, and for each of the previous two fiscal years.
Name and Principal Position |
| Year |
| Salary ($) |
| Bonus ($) |
| Stock Awards ($) (1) |
| Option Awards ($) (1) |
| Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (2) |
| Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (3) |
| All Other Compensation ($) (4) |
| Total ($) |
| |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
Frederick W. Smith | | 2016 | | 1,279,632 | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 7,572,908 | | 7,360,950 | | | | 543,543 | | 16,757,033 | | |||||||||
Chairman, President and |
| 2015 | | 1,266,960 | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 8,243,126 | | 981,723 | | 2,942,549 | | 372,817 | | 13,807,175 | | |||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
| 2014 | | 1,266,960 | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 6,710,435 | | 5,754,713 | | | | 419,869 | | 14,151,977 | | |||||||||
(Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
Alan B. Graf, Jr. | | 2016 | | 920,840 | | 0 | | | 623,829 | | | 914,898 | | 2,409,351 | | | | 600,087 | | 5,469,005 | | |||||||||
Executive Vice President |
| 2015 | | 902,784 | | 0 | | | 572,027 | | | 995,987 | | 505,581 | | 2,202,335 | | 613,814 | | 5,792,528 | | |||||||||
and Chief Financial Officer |
| 2014 | | 902,784 | | 0 | | | 554,068 | | | 810,732 | | 1,804,395 | | 265,189 | | 514,486 | | 4,851,654 | | |||||||||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
David J. Bronczek | | 2016 | | 960,936 | | 0 | | | 803,745 | | | 1,213,197 | | 3,201,327 | | | | 722,645 | | 6,901,850 | | |||||||||
President and Chief Executive |
| 2015 | | 942,096 | | 0 | | | 737,104 | | | 1,320,316 | | 598,561 | | 2,992,979 | | 654,050 | | 7,245,106 | | |||||||||
Officer FedEx Express |
| 2014 | | 942,096 | | 0 | | | 713,895 | | | 1,074,829 | | 2,227,188 | | 969,457 | | 581,432 | | 6,508,897 | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
T. Michael Glenn | | 2016 | | 850,028 | | 0 | | | 623,829 | | | 914,898 | | 2,339,297 | | 186,648 | | 640,209 | | 5,554,909 | | |||||||||
Executive Vice President, |
| 2015 | | 833,364 | | 0 | | | 572,027 | | | 995,987 | | 442,141 | | 3,038,492 | | 562,120 | | 6,444,131 | | |||||||||
Market Development and |
| 2014 | | 833,364 | | 0 | | | 554,068 | | | 810,732 | | 1,770,066 | | 738,829 | | 532,819 | | 5,239,878 | | |||||||||
Corporate Communications |
| | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
Robert B. Carter | | 2016 | | 778,216 | | 0 | | | 623,829 | | | 914,898 | | 2,277,809 | | 562,045 | | 588,897 | | 5,745,694 | | |||||||||
Executive Vice President, |
| 2015 | | 762,960 | | 0 | | | 572,027 | | | 995,987 | | 395,793 | | 730,363 | | 522,364 | | 3,979,494 | | |||||||||
FedEx Information Services |
| 2014 | | 762,960 | | 0 | | | 554,068 | | | 810,732 | | 1,770,479 | | 477,874 | | 558,190 | | 4,934,303 | | |||||||||
and Chief Information Officer |
| | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
40 | 2016 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
| Name |
| Year |
| AIC Payout ($) |
| LTI Payout ($) |
| Total Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | ||||
| F.W. Smith |
| 2016 | | 1,360,950 | | 6,000,000 | | 7,360,950 | | ||||
|
|
| 2015 | | 981,723 | | 0 | | 981,723 | | ||||
|
|
| 2014 | | 362,713 | | 5,392,000 | | 5,754,713 | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | ||||
| A.B. Graf, Jr. |
| 2016 | | 609,351 | | 1,800,000 | | 2,409,351 | | ||||
|
|
| 2015 | | 505,581 | | 0 | | 505,581 | | ||||
|
|
| 2014 | | 186,795 | | 1,617,600 | | 1,804,395 | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | ||||
| D.J. Bronczek |
| 2016 | | 951,327 | | 2,250,000 | | 3,201,327 | | ||||
|
|
| 2015 | | 598,561 | | 0 | | 598,561 | | ||||
|
|
| 2014 | | 205,188 | | 2,022,000 | | 2,227,188 | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | ||||
| T.M. Glenn |
| 2016 | | 539,297 | | 1,800,000 | | 2,339,297 | | ||||
|
|
| 2015 | | 442,141 | | 0 | | 442,141 | | ||||
|
|
| 2014 | | 152,466 | | 1,617,600 | | 1,770,066 | | ||||
|